alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fashion Tech International: Exhibit 10.8 - Prepared by TNT Filings Inc.



  



Exhibit 10.8


(English Summary)

Trademark License Agreement

 


Licensor:  Mr. Yu Changjun


ID Number: 23028119720924043X

 


Licensee:  the Company


Registered Address: No.3 Industry Area, High-Tech Zone, Daqing City, Heilongjiang


Telephone: 0459-4609466

 


Whereas,       


Licensor has applied to the Trademark Office for registration of such trademark and has passed the initial examination on 13 March 2008; the trademark will be publicized on the Official Gazette on 14 June 2008.

 


In accordance with Article 40 of PRC Trademark Law and Article 43 of the Implementation Rules of the PRC Trademark Law, the Parties, through amicable negotiation, entered into this Agreement on 16 May, 2008 at Daqing Heilongjiang, PRC with regard to the trademark license issues:

 


I. The Trademark To Be Licensed:  “农珍之冠”  

 


II. Specimen of the Trademark: (provided by the Assignor and certified with his seal)

 


III. Application/Register Number: 4894199
 


Country of Registry: PRC

 


IV. Effective Term of the Trademark: from 14 June 2008 to 13 June 2018;
 

 


V. Class of Goods:  


Licensor shall grant the license to Licensee for using the Trademark on goods in class 29.

 




 


VI. Condition Precedent of the License:
 


The Trademark is registered and a registration certificate is obtained; the Licensor warrants that it is the lawful owner of the Trademark.
 

 


VII. License Term:  


From June 14, 2008 to the date when the Trademark Office approves the assignment of ownership applied by the parties.  


  


VIII. Type of License: Exclusive License

 


IX. License Fees: the Trademark is licensed to the Company for RMB one yuan.
 

 


X. Rights and Obligations of the Parties:
 


1.


Licensee shall be entitled to exclusively use the Trademark under the Agreement;


2.


Licensor has right to supervise the quality of the Licensee’s products bearing the Trademark, and the Licensee shall guarantee the quality of such products;
 


3.


Licensee shall mark its company name and product origin on its products;


4.


Licensee shall not change the wording, image, or the combination thereof, of the Trademark, and nor shall it use the Trademark beyond the registered class for the Trademark;


5.


Without authorization of the Licensor, the Licensee shall not license the Trademark to any third party.

 


XI. Breach of Agreement:  


The breaching party shall be liable to any damages caused to the non-breaching party.
 


 


XII. Dispute Resolution:  


Any dispute arising out of the Agreement shall be amicably negotiated between the Parties. If no settlement is reach by such negotiation, either Party is entitled to bring the dispute to the court with proper jurisdiction.  




 


XIII. Miscellaneous:  


The Agreement will be executed in five counterparts which are equally binding. The Licensee shall file the Agreement with the Trademark Office after the execution date of the Agreement.
 

 


Execution:  


Licensor:  Yu Changjun


Signature:  


Licensee:  the Company  


Authorized Representative: Shi Jinglin
 


Date:  16 May 2008
Exhibt
        4.5

       

    

    REVOLVING
      LOAN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
      TWO

     

    Amendment
      Date: June
      1,
      2007

     

    Credit
      Limit: $15,000.00                

     

    RFG
      Acquisition II Inc., a Delaware corporation, promises to pay RICHARD F. BESTON,
      JR. (“Lender”), an individual, the sum of FIFTEEN THOUSAND and 00/100 DOLLARS
      ($15,000.00) (the “Amended Credit Limit”) or such other principal amount that
      may be outstanding, in no case to exceed the Amended Credit Limit, as evidenced
      by the books and records of Lender. 

     

    This
      Amendment Two hereby amends the interest rate charged on outstanding loan
      borrowings from 4.75% per annum to the Prime Rate of Interest, as listed in
      the
      Wall Street Journal, plus 1% per annum.

    


    This
      Amendment Two hereby amends the default rate of interest from 10.0% per annum
      to
      the Prime Rate of Interest, as listed in the Wall Street Journal, plus 6% per
      annum.

    


    All
      other
      terms and conditions of the original Revolving Loan Agreement, dated November
      20, 2006, as amended, remain unchanged and in full force and
      effect.

    


    This
      Amendment Two is effective as of the date listed above.

    


    

      
        	
                RFG
                  Acquisition II Inc.  

                 

                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                By:
                  

              	
                /s/ David
                  W. Matre

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                 

              	
                David
                  W. Matre

                Chief
                  Financial Officer

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 
	
                 

              	 	
                 

              	
                 

              	 


      

       

      
        	
                “Lender”   

                 

                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
              	
                /s/ 
                  Richard F. Beston, Jr.

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
              
	
                 

              	
                RICHARD
                  F. BESTON, JR., an individual

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 


      

    

     

    DO
      NOT DESTROY THIS ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-178271) of China Zenix Auto International Limited of our report dated April 28, 2015 relating
to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of China Zenix Auto International Limited and its subsidiaries (the Group) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the convenience translation of Renminbi amounts into United States dollar amounts), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Zenix Auto International Limited for the year ended December 31, 2015.

/s/ Crowe Horwath (HK) CPA Limited



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|Crowe Horwath (HK) CPA Limited           
|Hong Kong, the Peoples Republic of China
|April 28, 2016
No. 51119.

#### Protests 53883-K, etc., of I. Haber, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for the cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269; and (2) 1 percent for the cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*The protests were sustained to this extent.
Order entered April 14, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01033
- CV CHRISTOPHER BRUNING, Appellant

V. KYLE LANE HOLLOWELL, GUY JOSEPH YORK, AND YORK & YORK, INC., Appellees On Appeal from the 95th Judicial Dis trict Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 09326
- D



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing. We GRANT the motion. Appellant’s time to file a motion for rehearing is extended

to April 22, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
No. 48037.

#### Protests 987573-G, etc., of Saji Trading Co., Ltd. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstracts 33634, 38718, and 46265 the claim under paragraph 412 was sustained.
Case No. 9,179.

#### MARVIN v. CHAMBERS.

[12 Blatchf. 495: 113 N. B. R. 77; 1 N. Y. Wkly. Dig. 365.]

Circuit Court, E. D. New York.

April 17, 1875.

Bankruptcy — Illegal Preference — Mortgage to Secure Future Credits.

F., a dealer in boots and shoes, was accustomed to buy goods of C. At a time when he was not indebted to C., he applied to C. to buy more goods on credit, and it was agreed that C. should furnish him goods from time to time, on the security of a mortgage on certain lands of F. The mortgage was made by F. to C., being, in terms, to secure any liability, not exceeding $3.000, that might be incurred by F. to C.. and being so drawn as to cover any present ns well as any future liability. C. afterwards sold goods to F. to the value of $800. who continued his business, but was. shortly afterwards, adjudged a bankrupt. The assignee in bankruptcy of F. brought this suit to set aside the mortgage: *Meld,*that the mortgage was valid to the extent of the goods sold by C. to F. on the faith of the mortgage.

In equity.

Richard Marvin, in pro. per.

Charles M. Dickinson, for defendant.

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is an action brought by Richard Marvin, assignee in bankruptcy of Joseph Farrel, to set aside a mortgage made by Farrel to the defendant James Chambers. It appears, from the evidence, that Farrel was a dealer in boots and *928shoes, accustomed to buy goods of the defendant. On the 5th of June, 1874, Farrel, not being at the time indebted to Chambers, applied to Chambers to buy more goods upon credit, whereupon it was agreed that goods should be furnished him from time to time, upon the security of a mortgage upon certain lands. In pursuance of this arrangement, the mortgage in question was made, which, in terms, stated that it was given to secure any liability, not exceeding the sum of $3,000, that might be incurred by the mortgagor to the mortgagee. The clause in the mortgage is drawn to cover any present as well as any future liability; but, as before stated, it is admitted that no present liability existed at the time of its execution. Goods were thereafter sold by Chambers to Farrel, to the amount of some $800, and, no long time after-wards, Farrel became bankrupt. Now, Chambers claims to hold this mortgage as security for the value of the goods actually sold by him to Farrel upon the faith of the mortgage. The evidence contains some contradictory testimony as to whether Chambers knew that Farrel was insolvent at the time of the execution of the mortgage; but, there is no dispute as to the fact, that, after giving the mortgage, Farrel continued his business, and actually received from Chambers some $800 worth of goods, which were purchased upon the faith of the mortgage in question. The case is thus shown to be one of a mortgage executed in good faith, for a present good consideration. Such a mortgage is protected by the bankrupt law, and, to the extent of the advances actually made, is good as against an assignee in bankruptcy.

There must, therefore, be a decree dismissing the bill, with costs.
No. 55417.

#### J. Eisenberg Co. *v.*United States,

protest 135520-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

When the case was called for trial, defendant conceded that the merchandise represented by invoice items 169/C-1/6 and 169/C-100/104, to which the protest is limited, consists of wool rags. The claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.
Make half your plate 

 fruits and veggies.

A Lot Can Happen

When You Eat Your Colors

They’ll help you eat 

 smart to play hard!

Explore a world of possibilities in the garden and on your plate.

U.S. Department of Agriculture • Food and Nutrition Service 

April 2013 • FNS-454-F • USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Help stamp out steel importation fraud; reward up to $250,000

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Help stamp out steel importation fraud; reward up to $250,000 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  U.S. Customs Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Customs Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Customs poster series ; 96 (1/88); Customs poster series ; 96. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  141 × 31 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018793053.jpg; 018793053.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-178271) of China Zenix Auto International Limited of
our report dated April 28, 2017 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of China Zenix Auto International Limited and its subsidiaries (the Group) (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the convenience translation of Renminbi amounts into United States dollar amounts), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Zenix Auto International Limited for the year ended
December 31, 2016.

/s/ Centurion ZD CPA Limited



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|Centurion ZD CPA Limited                 
|Hong Kong, the Peoples Republic of China
|April 28, 2017
U.S. Department

of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Federal Railroad 

Administration

Dustin Helbling

Red River Valley & Western Railroad 

Manager Safety & Compliance

422 Minnesota Avenue

Breckenridge, MN 56520

March 18, 2024

Dear Mr. Helbling:

This letter responds to the Red River Valley & Western Railroad (RRVW) submission dated February 

1, 2024, to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval of its material modifications to the 

RRVW Conductor Certification Program received by FRA on February 1, 2024. RRVW has complied with 

FRA's procedures for submission and approval of programs described in appendix B to 49 CFR part 242. FRA 

reviewed the railroad's program modification and determined that the railroad's program modification 

conforms with the requirements of 49 CFR part 242 for the reasons discussed below. 

Your submission states that on February 1, 2024, the railroad provided a copy of its program modification to 

Mr. Roger Brown, President of SMART Local 1137, the labor organization representing the railroad's 

employees. FRA received no comments on the program or program modification by the labor organizations.

The program modifications are consistent with the model of the previously approved Class III railroad 

programs. FRA understands that the modifications are intended to provide more detail to the conductor 

certification process and update contact information. Additional modifications to the submission also 

addressed deficiencies with the standard requirements of 49 CFR part 242, appendix B. Standards have been 

set regarding re-qualifying over a specific territory. Detailed training standards have been established in 

Section Four of your conductor training program. 

Please continue in your efforts to improve railroad safety on your system. 

Please contact us with any questions regarding this submission at (202) 366-0978 or 

FRAOPCERTPROG@dot.gov or Kevin.Lewis@dot.gov or Kurt.Erickson@dot.gov

Sincerely,

Kurt Erickson

FRA Rail Safety Specialist – Certification 

pp Christian Holt 

Operating Practices Staff Director
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 11053 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Semaj Kinney,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:23

- CR

- 44

- 4

**__________________________ ____**  Before **Jolly, Higginson,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Semaj Kinney pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute fentanyl in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 21 U.S.C. § 841. He

now c hallenges the sufficiency of the factual basis in support of his guilty plea, relying on McFadden v. United States , 576 U.S. 186 (2015).

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publicat ion. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 3, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-11053 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2024No. 23

- 11053

2 We review the unpreserved argument for plain error , “ex amining the entire record for facts supporting the guilty plea and drawing reasonable inferences from those facts to determine whether the conduct to which the defendant admits satisfies the elements of the offense charged.” United States v. Escajeda , 8 F .4th 423, 426 (5th Cir. 2021)

. Based on that review of the record, including the factual basis and other record evidence regarding Kinney’s admitted role in a conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands of fentanyl pills, we are not persuaded that the district court plainly erred in accepting the guilty plea. See id. ; United States v. Alvarado

- Casas , 715 F.3d 945, 951

- 52 (5th Cir. 2013).
**AFFIRMED**

. Case: 23-11053 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2024
EXHIBIT 99.2
                         TO TSR INC. REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                                NOVEMBER 30, 2002
 CERTIFICATION BY JOHN G. SHARKEY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, Vice President of Finance of TSR, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter year ended November 30, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") accompanying this
certification fully complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The
foregoing certification is incorporated solely for purposes of complying with
the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to
be used for any other purpose.

Dated:   January 3, 2003


                                      /s/ John G. Sharkey
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      John G. Sharkey, Vice President of Finance
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 80 

Relating to the enrollment of S. 1932. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2006 

Mr. FRIST submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the enrollment of S. 1932. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the enrollment of the bill S. 1932 as 

3 presented to the President for his signature on February 

4 8, 2006, is deemed the true enrollment of the bill reflect5 ing the intent of the Congress in enacting the bill into 

6 law. 

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6780

DOUGLAS J. DODSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

TERRY A. O’BRIEN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:06-cv-00105-sgw)

Submitted: August 21, 2006 Decided: September 1, 2006

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas J. Dodson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Douglas J. Dodson, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Dodson v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00105-sgw (W.D.

Va. Feb. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED