alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ERNEST G. PETTERSON, Specialist Six, U. S. Army, Appellant

11 USCMA 502, 29 CMR 318

No. 13,827

Decided May 27, 1960

*First Lieutenant Leonard Etz*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief were *Colonel Harley A. Lanning, Major Edward Fenig,*and *First Lieutenant James G. Garner.*

*First Lieutenant Alvin B. Fox*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel James G. Mc-Conaughy*and *First Lieutenant Avram G. Hammer.*

Opinion of the Court

HomeR FERGUSON, Judge:

The accused was found guilty of twenty-one specifications of larceny, in violation of Uniform Code of Military *503Justice, Article 121, 10 USC § 921. He -was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, and confinement at hard labor for ■five years. Reducing the period of confinement involved to two years, the convening authority otherwise approved the •sentence. Following affirmance of the findings and sentence by the board of ■review, we granted accused’s petition on the issue whether the law officer erred prejudicially in overruling defense objections to the admission of certain depositions taken upon written interrogatories.

In view of the precisely stated objections of defense counsel, made both to the convening authority prior to the trial and to the law officer during the •proceedings, no question is presented ■concerning waiver of accused’s constitutional right to be confronted by the witnesses against him. Accordingly, our decision in United States v Jacoby, 11 USCMA 428, 29 CMR 244, is dis-positive.

The decision of the board of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing may be ordered.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

LatimeR, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

The interested reader may find my views on this question set forth in United States v Sutton, 3 USCMA 220, 11 CMR 220; United States v Parrish, 7 USCMA 337, 22 CMR 127; and my dissenting opinion in United States v Jacoby, 11 USCMA 428, 29 CMR 244.
EXHIBIT 32

                           Section 1350 Certifications

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
      TransNet Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify to such officer's
      knowledge that:

1.    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period
      ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ Steven J. Wilk
-------------------------------
Steven J. Wilk
Chief Executive Officer

Date:  February 22, 2011

/s/ John J. Wilk
-------------------------------
John J. Wilk
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  February 22, 2011
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-CR-138

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP

MICHAEL E. TURON, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On July 26, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Count One

of the Information charging him with interstate receipt of obscene matters in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1462 (Doc. 14). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter

before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion,

and had a basis in fact. Further, the Magistrate Judge observed that at the time Defendant entered

his guilty plea, he was in full possession of his faculties, was not suffering from any apparent

physical or mental illness, and was not under the influence of narcotics or alcohol. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00138-GCS-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/27/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty

of interstate receipt of obscene matters. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00138-GCS-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/27/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Speak out & make NOYS: youth changing the world one voice at a time

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Speak out & make NOYS: youth changing the world one voice at a time 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Speak out and make NOYS; Youth changing the world one voice at a time 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  2000-2010 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 48 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  056622037.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 50607.

#### Protests 57564-K (B), etc., of H. W. Baker Linen Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon' were such as to bring the ease within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**
 
SuDoc:
Item Number:
CGP systemNumber:
 
October 23, 2017
# Official Journal C 197/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 197 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5024 August 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 197

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5024 August 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| | 70th plenary session held on 6 and 7 June 2007 |
| 2007/C 197/01 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the demographic future of Europe | 1 |
| 2007/C 197/02 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the 2006 enlargement package — Integration capacity | 7 |
| 2007/C 197/03 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the enlargement package 2006 — Candidate countries | 12 |
| 2007/C 197/04 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions 2006 enlargement package — Pre-candidate countries | 16 |
| 2007/C 197/05 | Outlook opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the contribution of local and regional authorities to the European Union's sustainable development strategy | 21 |
| 2007/C 197/06 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on relaunching the process of reforming the European Union in anticipation of the European council of 21 and 22 June 2007 | 30 |
| 2007/C 197/07 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on Community postal services | 37 |
| 2007/C 197/08 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on an EU strategy to support Member States in reducing alcohol-related harm | 48 |
| 2007/C 197/09 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on governance in the European consensus on development | 52 |
| 2007/C 197/10 | Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on regions for economic change | 57 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

Committee of the Regions

70th plenary session held on 6 and 7 June 2007

2007/C 197/01

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the demographic future of Europe

1

2007/C 197/02

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the 2006 enlargement package — Integration capacity

7

2007/C 197/03

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the enlargement package 2006 — Candidate countries

12

2007/C 197/04

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions 2006 enlargement package — Pre-candidate countries

16

2007/C 197/05

Outlook opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the contribution of local and regional authorities to the European Union's sustainable development strategy

21

2007/C 197/06

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on relaunching the process of reforming the European Union in anticipation of the European council of 21 and 22 June 2007

30

2007/C 197/07

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on Community postal services

37

2007/C 197/08

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on an EU strategy to support Member States in reducing alcohol-related harm

48

2007/C 197/09

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on governance in the European consensus on development

52

2007/C 197/10

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on regions for economic change

57

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 50232.

#### Protests 92051-K, etc., of Irving L. Hartman Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
AGENCY COORDINATION

Appendix

F

F. Agency Coordination










U.S Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration 

Mr. David Valenstein 

Environment Systems and Planning 

Federal Railroad Administration 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Illinois Division 

September 2, 20 1I 

3250 Executive Park Dr. 

Springfield, IL 62703 

(217) 492-4640 

www.fhwa.dot.gov/ildiv 

In Reply Refer To: 

HPER-IL 

Subject: Chicago to St. Louis High-Speed Rail Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement 

Dear Mr. Valenstein: 

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has received your letter of August 9, 20 II, requesting 

FHW A become a cooperating agency for the subject project. The FHW A hereby accepts the request 

to become a cooperating agency because FHW A possesses special expertise with respect to the 

environmental issues that will be analyzed as part ofthe project. Specifically, FHWA will be 

interested in reviewing the potential impacts the project may have on safety and operations of 

roadways that may be impacted by the project as well as any impacts that the project may have on the 

Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency Program. 

FHW A agrees to participate in the development of the project to the degree, time and resources 

permit in the manner you requested, including: 

• Provide meaningful and early input on defining the purpose and need, determining the range 

of alternatives to be carried forward, and the methodologies and level of detail required in the 

alternatives analysis; 

• Participate in coordination meetings and joint field reviews, as appropriate, and 

• Timely review and comment on the pre-draft and pre-final environmental documents to 

reflect the views and concerns of FHW A 

We look forward to working with the Federal Railroad Administration on the project. Please contact 

Matt Fuller at (217) 492-4625 or by email at Matt.Fuller@dot.gov should you have any further 

information or inquiries regarding this project. 

fi;ifJ%/k/( 

Jon-Paul Kohler 

Planning and Program Development Manager 

ecc: Mr. George Weber, Bureau ofRailroads, lOOT 

Mr. Michael Garcia, Bureau of High Speed and Passenger Rail, IDOT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 1 AND 2 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,067
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,987
<PP&E>                                         125,936
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,231
<BONDS>                                         13,994
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           262
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,231
<SALES>                                          4,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,112
<CGS>                                            1,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (29)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                        23
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Opinion filed February 4, 2021

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-20-00210-CV

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.B., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 29th District Court

Palo Pinto County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C48674

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a final order in which the trial court terminated the 

parental rights of K.B.’s mother and father. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 161.001

(West Supp. 2020). The mother filed a notice of appeal. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a 

supporting brief in which he professionally and conscientiously examines the record 

and applicable law and concludes that the appeal presents no issues of arguable merit 

and is therefore frivolous. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and 

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re 
2

Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406–08 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); High v. State, 573 

S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). In light of a holding by the 

Texas Supreme Court, however, an Anders motion to withdraw “may be premature”

if filed in the court of appeals under the circumstances presented in this case. See In 

re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016). The court in P.M. stated that “appointed 

counsel’s obligations can be satisfied by filing a petition for review that satisfies the 

standards for an Anders brief.” Id. at 27–28. 

Appellant’s counsel provided Appellant with a copy of the brief and the 

motion to withdraw. In compliance with Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 318–20 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014), counsel provided Appellant with a copy of the record in this 

cause and informed Appellant of her right to review the record and file a pro se

response to counsel’s brief. We conclude that Appellant’s counsel has satisfied his

duties under Anders, Schulman, and Kelly. 

We note that Appellant has not filed a pro se response to counsel’s Anders

brief and motion to withdraw. Following the procedures outlined in Anders and 

Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record in this cause, and we agree 

that the appeal is frivolous. However, in light of P.M., we must deny the motion to 

withdraw that was filed by Appellant’s court-appointed counsel. See P.M., 520 

S.W.3d at 27. 

Accordingly, we deny counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the trial 

court’s order of termination. 

PER CURIAM

February 4, 2021

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of TransTechnology  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended June 30, 2002, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the  Report  fully
complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934;  and (2) the  information  contained in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.


Date:  August 12, 2002         /s/Michael J. Berthelot
       ------------------      ---------------------------------------------
                               Michael J. Berthelot, Chief Executive Officer


Date:  August 12, 2002         /s/Joseph F. Spanier
       ------------------      ------------------------------------------
                               Joseph F. Spanier, Chief Financial Officer


                                       26
Exhibit 10.14
 PARK STERLING CORPORATION
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD
   A.
    
    Grant Date:
 _____.B.
    
    Restricted Shares:
 _____ 
shares of the Companys voting common
stock (Common Stock), $1.00 par value per share.C.
    
    Plan under which granted: Park Sterling Corporation 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
 Vesting
 Percentage of Restricted SharesPerformance-Based-Vesting Date
    
    which are Vested Shares
  
  .
  Park Sterling CorporationBy:DirectorTitle:




---



##### 



ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD
 Issuance of Restricted Shares




---



##### 



Acknowledgement by Director of Tax Election Opportunity
 Dividends
   Restrictions on Transfer of Restricted Shares
 General Restrictions




---



##### 



Certain Permitted Transfers provided provided further
 Additional Restrictions on Transfer
  transfer is restricted
 The shares evidenced by this certificate have been issued pursuant to an exemption
from registration under the Securities act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) and
applicable state Securities laws and as such may only be sold or otherwise transferred: (1)
pursuant to registration or an exemption from registration under the Securities Act , including
but not limited to Rule 144 thereunder, and the securities laws of any applicable state or
other jurisdiction; or (2) if, in the opinion of counsel, in form and substance satisfactory
to the issuer, such transfer is exempt from registration or is otherwise in compliance with
applicable federal and state securities laws.
 The securities evidenced by this certificate are subject to restrictions on transfer and
forfeiture provisions which also apply to the transferee as set forth in a restricted stock
Award , dated February
 _____, 2011, a copy of which is available from the Company.
 Opinion of Counsel
 Lock-up Agreement




---



##### 



Change in Capitalization
    Governing Laws
 Successors




---



##### 



Notice
 If to the Company:
    
    Park Sterling CorporationAttn: Secretary1043 E. Morehead Street, Suite 201Charlotte, NC 28204If to the Recipient:
  Severability
 Entire Agreement
 Headings and Capitalized Terms
 Specific Performance
 No Right to Continued Service
 Compliance with Section 409A of the Code