alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 2:11-cv-00850-EAS-TPK Doc #: 26 Filed: 05/16/12 Page: 1 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00850-EAS-TPK Doc #: 26 Filed: 05/16/12 Page: 2 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00850-EAS-TPK Doc #: 26 Filed: 05/16/12 Page: 3 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00850-EAS-TPK Doc #: 26 Filed: 05/16/12 Page: 4 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00850-EAS-TPK Doc #: 26 Filed: 05/16/12 Page: 5 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00850-EAS-TPK Doc #: 26 Filed: 05/16/12 Page: 6 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T10:25:44-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 62014.

#### Groeneveld Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 225514-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
exv10w4






Exhibit 10.4









HEADQUARTERS

17000 Rotunda Drive

Dearborn, MI 48120-1100

USA




	 	 	 
	 

	 	CONFIDENTIAL
	 

	 	           August 14, 2008
	 

	 	      VIA FACSIMILE AND E-MAIL






Visteon Corporation

One Village Center Drive

Van Buren Township, MI 48111-5711

Attention: John Donofrio, General Counsel

Facsimile No.: 734-710-7132

E-mail: jdonofri@visteon.com





			
	Re:	 	Visteon Salaried Employee Lease Agreement dated October 1, 2005 (the “Agreement”) between
Visteon Corporation (“Visteon”) and Automotive Components Holdings, LLC (“ACH”)





Ladies and Gentlemen:



     This letter serves to confirm our agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the
Agreement, that the term of the Agreement is hereby extended to December 31, 2014 and that all
references in the Agreement to December 31, 2010 are hereby changed to December 31, 2014. This
letter also serves as notice of ACH’s extension of the term of the Agreement through December 31,
2014 pursuant to Section 1.01 as amended hereby. Finally, Section 4.06 is amended to read as
follows:




     Section 4.06. Extended Term Rate. During the Extended Term, ACH shall reimburse
Visteon on the same basis as set forth in Section 4.01 through Section 4.04; provided,
however, that during any portion of the Extended Term where the Master Services Agreement
has expired or the personnel and benefits administration services with respect to the Leased
Employees (“HR Services”) under the Master Services Agreement have been terminated, (a)
Visteon shall, in addition to the types of reimbursable expenses set forth in Section 4.01,
be reimbursed monthly for continued provision of HR Services at five percent (5%) of the
reimbursable expenses set forth in Section 4.01, excluding subsection (vii), of the Leased
Employees who are leased at that time; and (b) except as provided in the preceding clause
(a), Visteon shall provide the HR Services to ACH under substantially the same terms and
conditions as such HR Services were provided under the Master Services Agreement.



 









 





Page 2 of 2

Visteon Salaried Employee Lease Agreement




     Please confirm your agreement to the above by signing and dating this letter below and
returning an original to the undersigned. Thank you.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Yours truly,	 	 
	 	 	AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS	 	 
	 	 	HOLDINGS, LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ W. C. Connelley	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed:	 	 
	VISTEON CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Heidi A. Sepanik	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Title: Secretary
EXHIBIT 13.8







April 24th, 2012



To whom it may concern,



CONSENT



This is to confirm that ICD research, conducted consumer surveys
commissioned by SodaStream International Ltd. in the following countries as detailed below:



|Country |  | Date of Survey |  | Number of Respondents
|------- |  | -------------- |  | ---------------------
|UK      |  | August 2011    |  | 1006                 



The survey questions included the following questions:



| | 1. | Do you have or have you ever had a home carbonation system or a similar appliance in your household? (refer to the past 5 years)
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Which make is/was this home carbonation system?
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------



We hereby give our consent to the use of data from the above
surveys in the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by SodaStream International Ltd. with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission and to the reference in the Annual Report to the name ICD Research in connection therewith.



We further consent to the incorporation by reference of this
consent, data from the above surveys and references to our name in connection therewith in the registration statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-170299) of SodaStream International Ltd.



[Signature page follows]











Sincerely,



ICD RESEARCH LTD.



|By: | /s/ Neil Hendry |                  
|--- | --------------- | -----------------
|    | Name:           | Neil Hendry      
|    | Title:          | Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Tokheim
Corporation's February 29, 1996, quarterly financial statements and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000098559
<NAME> TOKHEIM CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-1996
<CASH>                                            4501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    33761
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1142
<INVENTORY>                                      37602<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 77633
<PP&E>                                           84284<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                   56871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  111708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            31913
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             6786<F3>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         18903<F4>
<OTHER-SE>                                         505<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    111708
<SALES>                                          49548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 49548
<CGS>                                            37860<F6>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    37860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (823)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (155)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (668)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
<FN>
<F1>Represents gross inventory net of LIFO and loss reserves.
<F2>Represents gross PP&E.
<F3>Represents redeemable preferred stock of $24,000 less Guaranteed ESOP of
$13,280 and treasury stock of $3,934.
<F4>Represents common stock of $19,409 less Guaranteed ESOP of $303 and treasury
stock of $203.
<F5>Represents retained earnings of $8,645 less minimum pension liability of 
$3,868 and foreign currency translation adjustments of $4,272.
<F6>Includes product development expenses and excludes depreciation and
amortization.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

Federal Railroad Administration - Compliance Checklist for -< 49 CFR Part 229.121 Locomotive Cab Noise

 Pag

Date:

49 CFR Part - Criteria examined Yes No § 229.121(a)(1) Has the railroad properly verified or tested the level of static noise in locomotive

cabs? Request copies of certification letters and procedures used to do

measurements and verify compliance.

Defect Failurafter Olevel.

§ 229.121(a)(2) Has the railroad modified or altered any locomotives built after October 29, 2007?

Has the railroad tested the level of static noise in locomotive cabs to verify themodifications have not resulted in excessive levels? Request copies of locomotive maintenance records to determine if the railroad

modified or altered any covered locomotives.

 Request copies of procedures used to do measurements and verify

compliance.

 Interview employees and representatives about any modifications and

perceived changes in noise levels.

Defect Improlocomlevels 

§ 229.121(a)(3) Has the railroad tested the level of static noise in locomotive cabs in compliance

with appendix H? Request copies of procedures used to do measurements and verify

compliance.

Defect Failurprotoc

§ 229.121(b)(1) Has the railroad made appropriate repairs to items identified within the time

frames specified? Request copies of excessive noise reports, railroad’s maintenance procedures

and identify the intervals used to do the specific repairs identified in theexcessive noise reports. 

 Rely on expertise of MP&E Inspectors providing assistance.

 Refer to 229.121(b)(2) below for a list of the most common items. 

Defect Failurreport item idnoise a

§ 229.121(b)(2) O The intent of this section is to identify the most common repair items that, if

not maintained properly, can lead to excessive noise reports. Most can berepaired relatively quickly. 
Federal Railroad Administration - Compliance Checklist for -

< 49 CFR Part 229.121 Locomotive Cab Noise

 Pag

Date:

49 CFR Part - Criteria examined Yes No 

2

§ 229.121(b)(3) Has the railroad made appropriate repairs to items identified within the time

frames specified? Request copies of excessive noise reports, railroad’s maintenance procedures

and identify the intervals used to do the specific repairs identified in theexcessive noise reports. 

 Rely on expertise of MP&E Inspectors providing assistance.

 Refer to 229.121(b)(2) above for a list of the most common items. 

Defect Failurreport in goo

§ 229.121(b)(4) Does the railroad have an appropriate record keeping system that tracks

complaints and the repairs done to address them?< Does the system track times as well as what was done? Request copies of excessive noise reports, railroad’s maintenance procedures

and the records that are used for tracking and resolving the excessive noisereports. 

 Rely on expertise of MP&E Inspectors providing assistance.

 If the system is electronic, determine if any changes to records are tracked in a

traceable manner.

Defect Failurrecord
Exhibit 31.4





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Daniel R. Chevallard, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Regulus Therapeutics Inc.; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 29, 2019/s/ Daniel R. ChevallardDaniel R. ChevallardChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Before the Third Division,

December 2, 1944

No. 49830.

#### Protest 101916-K of J. L. Hammett Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In view of stipulation of counsel entered into at the trial and section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the court found that the collector in reliquidating the entry in accordance with the order of the court was without authority to revise other assessments in respect to which the statutory time within which such revision may be made had expired. The court therefore directed the collector to reliquidate the entry assessing said internal revenue tax upon said merchandise at the rate of .006 dollars per pound, as claimed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. SALVAD OR GU I LL ER M O J I M ENEZ P IZ A N A , a. k. a. R ob ert o Ji m enez -P i na, a. k. a. S al vado r J i m enez -P i zana, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 10121 D. C . No . 4 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 9 4 6 - J AT ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J a m e s A . T e i l bor g, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S al vado r G ui l l erm o Ji m enez -P i zana appeal s f rom the di stri ctcourt ’ s order r e voki ng hi s s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e a nd the 12- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d upon r e voc a t i on. P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), 

# FI LED JU L 01 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 10121 2 Ji m enez -P i zana’ s c ou nselhas f i l ed a bri ef

st at i ng there ar e no g roun ds for r el i ef , a l ong w i th am ot i on t o w i thdr aw a s c ouns e l of r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d the ap p el l an tth e o p p o rtu n i ty t o fi l e a p ro se sup p l em en t al b ri ef. N o p ro se s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f

ora ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0

– 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. A cco rd i n g l y, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en ti s A FFI R M ED .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WILLIAM TILTON MERCER, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:12-CV-0607 

 : 

 v. : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 : 

 : 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL : 

 SECURITY, : Magistrate Judge Kemp 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 On June 27, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation in this case (Doc. 15), recommending that this Court remand the decision of 

the Commissioner for further consideration of the opinions articulated by plaintiff’s treating 

physicians, in accordance with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(c)(2). Specifically, the Administrative Law 

Judge (“ALJ”) must set forth reasons for giving less than controlling weight to the opinion of a 

treating source. If the opinion of a treating source is not deemed controlling, the ALJ must 

weigh that opinion in light of other factors set forth in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527 in order to 

determine the proper weight to give that opinion. The parties were advised of their right to 

object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. (Id. 

at 13-14). No objection has been filed. 

 

Case: 2:12-cv-00607-ALM-TPK Doc #: 16 Filed: 01/15/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Since neither party has objected, and deadline for such objections elapsed on July 11, 

2013, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and 

REMANDS to the Commissioner for reconsideration in accordance with this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley s 

ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DATED: January 15, 2014 

Case: 2:12-cv-00607-ALM-TPK Doc #: 16 Filed: 01/15/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6389.

Entry No. 706357, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, August 1944, etc.

Certified August 1944, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 19, 1944, etc.

(Decided September 27, 1946)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the‘additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
APPENDIX S-A-3

RELOCATED SLOAN MSF SITE

S-A-3-1
S-A-3-2
Before the Second Division,

April 16, 1952

No. 56556.

protests 170445-K, etc. (New York).

#### Albert Bonnier Publishing House, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
(Reap. Dec. 8937)

Entry Nos. 701742; 719387.

#### Acec Electric Corp. *v.*United States

(Decided July 25, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge;

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeals for a reappraisement were called for hearing, and the cases were ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that — •

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Click! your safety, our concern

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Click! your safety, our concern 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  US Army Corps of Engineers 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018265142.jpg; 018265142.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
July 8, 1938

No. 38989.

Suit *4112.*

#### *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States.*

T. D. 48960 affirmed.
EX-4.67




 Exhibit 4.67 

English Translation 

Power of Attorney 
 I, a
shareholder of Tianjin Jinhu Culture Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Tianjin Jinhu”), aggregately hold 50% of the equity of the Company and hereby agree to authorize Fox Information Technology (Tianjin) Limited
(hereinafter referred to as “Video Tianjin” or the “Authorized Person”) to exercise the shareholder’s rights associated with the said 50% of shareholding, and hereby irrevocably authorize the Authorized Person to
exercise the following rights within the term of validity of this Power of Attorney: 
 I authorize the Authorized Person to act as my
full-fledged representative and as the holder of 50% of stock equity of Tianjin Jinhu to exercise all rights that I enjoy as shareholder according to laws and the Company’s articles of association, including the right to propose the
holding of shareholders’ meetings, receive any notices regarding the holding of shareholders’ meetings and rules of proceedings, attend shareholders’ meetings of Tianjin Jinhu and exercise all voting powers as the holder of 50%
of shares of the Company (including acting as my authorized representative at shareholders’ meetings of Tianjin Jinhu to nominate and appoint directors, General Manager, Financial Director and other senior executives of Tianjin Jinhu, decide
dividend distributions, etc.), sell or assign the 50% shareholding that I hold in Tianjin Jinhu, etc. 
 The Authorized Person has
the right to designate the individual appointed by its board of directors (or Executive Director) to exercise the rights granted by the authorizing party hereunder. 

This Power of Attorney shall remain valid for ten years from the date of execution unless the Business Operation Agreement signed by and among
Tianjin Jinhu, Video Tianjin, other shareholders of Tianjin Jinhu and me on October 20, 2016 is terminated early due to whatsoever reason. Upon expiration of the term of this Power of Attorney, if requested by Video Tianjin, I shall extend the
term of this Power of Attorney as requested. 
  

	
	Authorizing Party: Xiufeng Deng
	(Signature)
	
	 /s/ Xiufeng Deng


 Date: October 10, 2016