alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# F-16 Fighting Falcon, Air National Guard

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  F-16 Fighting Falcon, Air National Guard 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  141 × 51 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  022485405.jpg; 022485405.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: OHIO EXECUTION

PROTOCOL LITIGATION Case No. 2:11-cv-1016

JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

This document relates to: All Plaintiffs.

ORDER

On October 30, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a motion to modify (ECF No. 630) the protective

order set forth in this Court’s October 26, 2015 Opinion and Order (ECF No. 629). In that

motion, Plaintiffs ask this Court to modify the stayed protective order to permit drug-source

discovery. Plaintiffs propose that the Court employ a “RESTRICTED” category of discovery

that would theoretically preclude disclosure of the protected information to the public and

thereby avoid the public-pressure concerns addressed by the protective order.

The motion to modify is not well taken. Without questioning the character or

professionalism of any of the counsel who have appeared in this litigation, the Court remains

cognizant of the leaks that have nonetheless occurred in this litigation in the past where

confidential information has appeared in the media, despite this Court establishing protections to

preclude such disclosure. Additionally, in asserting that their qualified-disclosure proposal

addresses all of the concerns underlying the protective order, Plaintiffs either misread or

strategically mischaracterize this Court’s October 26, 2015 Opinion and Order. Part of the

harassment, harm, or similar undesirable consequences implicitly animating the protective order

decision is that disclosure of identities subjects the disclosed persons or entities to suit. A

reasonable inference to be culled from the applications for anonymity noted in the privilege log

Case: 2:11-cv-01016-EAS-MRM Doc #: 632 Filed: 11/02/15 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
is that the entities making application do not want to subject themselves to such litigation. This

is one reason why the Court noted the burden and prejudice on Defendants that disclosure would

present: “a loss of the ability to pursue, much less fulfill, a lawful duty,” which is the ability to

conduct executions by lethal injection. (ECF No. 629, at Page ID # 19406-19407.) It is also

why this Court expressly recognized, in certifying the decision for interlocutory appeal, the issue

that “granting the motion for a protective order means that this Court has essentially and

summarily immunized the unnamed pharmacy defendants and others from the claims asserted

against them in this case.” (Id. at Page ID # 19411.)

Plaintiffs’ requested modification of the protective order does nothing to mitigate, much

less eradicate, the foregoing concerns. To the contrary, the modification would lead to one of

the consequences necessitating the protective order. The Court therefore DENIES the motion to

modify the protective order. (ECF No. 630.) 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case: 2:11-cv-01016-EAS-MRM Doc #: 632 Filed: 11/02/15 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9198 

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to utilize a risk-informed, 

performance-based licensing approach to the maximum extent practicable 

for the purpose of expediting the nuclear licensing process, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. DONALDS (for himself, Mr. NEHLS, and Mr. WILLIAMS of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to utilize 

a risk-informed, performance-based licensing approach to 

the maximum extent practicable for the purpose of expediting the nuclear licensing process, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maximize Risk-In5 formed, Performance-Based Licensing Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9198 IH

1 SEC. 2. RISK-INFORMED, PERFORMANCE-BASED LICENS2 ING. 

3 (a) DEFINITION OF TECHNOLOGY-INCLUSIVE REGU4 LATORY FRAMEWORK.—Section 3(14) of the Nuclear En5 ergy Innovation and Modernization Act (42 U.S.C. 2215 

6 note)— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘where appropriate’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘to the maximum extent practicable’’; and 

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘that are consistent with the 

10 expectations, concepts, and definitions in the Staff 

11 Requirements Memorandum from the Secretary of 

12 the Commission to the Executive Director for Oper13 ations dated March 1, 1999, regarding ‘Staff Re14 quirements - SECY–98–144 - White Paper on Risk15 Informed and Performance-Based Regulation’ (here16 inafter referred to as ‘SRM–SECY–98–144’)’’ after 

17 ‘‘risk-informed and performance-based techniques’’. 

18 (b) ANNUAL TRAINING.—Section 103(a)(2) of the 

19 Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (42 

20 U.S.C. 2133 note) is amended by inserting ‘‘, including 

21 annual training on the expectations, concepts, and defini22 tions in SRM–SECY–98–144,’’ after ‘‘strategies’’. 

23 (c) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con24 gress that it is important that the Nuclear Regulatory 

25 Commission and the regulated community have a common 

26 understanding of how risk-informed and performanceVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:33 Aug 28, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H9198.IH H9198

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9198 IH

1 based techniques are applied to Nuclear Regulatory Com2 mission rulemaking, licensing, inspection, assessment, en3 forcement, and other decision-making processes. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# This fatal accident was caused by teenagers getting stoned and going too fast, so was this one: AIDS, another way drugs can kill

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  This fatal accident was caused by teenagers getting stoned and going too fast, so was this one: AIDS, another way drugs can kill 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  National Institute on Drug Abuse 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Institute on Drug Abuse 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Substance abuse prevention poster. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  025814779.jpg; 025814779.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
S. J. Res. 40

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

Joint Resolution

Authorizing the printing and binding of a supplement to, and revised edition of,

Senate Procedure.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF SUPPLEMENT TO, AND REVISED EDITION

OF, SENATE PROCEDURE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Each of the following documents shall be

prepared under the supervision of Alan Frumin, Parliamentarian

and Parliamentarian Emeritus of the Senate, and shall be printed

and bound as a Senate document:

(1) A supplement to ‘‘Riddick’s Senate Procedure’’, to be

styled ‘‘Frumin’s Supplement to Riddick’s Senate Procedure’’.

(2) A revised edition of ‘‘Riddick’s Senate Procedure’’, to

be styled ‘‘Frumin’s Senate Procedure’’.

(b) COPIES.—One thousand five hundred copies of each document described in subsection (a) shall be printed for distribution

to Senators and for the use of the Senate.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 131 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 131

 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
   the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 28, 2005

 Mr. Specter (for himself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Biden, Mr. DeWine, 
  Mr. Kohl, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Schumer, Mr. 
   Hatch, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Durbin, and Ms. Collins) 
                   submitted the following resolution

               April 29 (legislative day, April 28), 2005

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
   the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and 
        enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance and dedication of law 
        enforcement personnel;
Whereas more than 850,000 men and women, at great risk to their personal safety, 
        presently serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace;
Whereas peace officers are on the front line in preserving the right of the 
        children of the United States to receive an education in a crime-free 
        environment, a right that is all too often threatened by the insidious 
        fear caused by violence in schools;
Whereas 154 peace officers across the United States were killed in the line of 
        duty during 2004, which is below the decade-long average of 169 deaths 
        annually;
Whereas a number of factors contributed to this reduction in deaths, including 
        better equipment and the increased use of bullet-resistant vests, 
        improved training, longer prison terms for violent offenders, and 
        advanced emergency medical care;
Whereas every other day, 1 out of every 9 peace officers is assaulted, 1 out of 
        every 25 peace officers is injured, and 1 out of every 6,000 peace 
        officers is killed in the line of duty somewhere in the United States; 
        and
Whereas on May 15, 2005, more than 20,000 peace officers are expected to gather 
        in Washington, D.C. to join with the families of their recently fallen 
        comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went before them: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes May 15, 2005, as Peace Officers Memorial 
        Day, in honor of Federal, State, and local officers killed or 
        disabled in the line of duty; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        this day with appropriate ceremonies and respect.
                                 <all>
```
#### Lawrence Edward BENSON v. STATE of Arkansas

CA CR 86-126

720 S.W.2d 340

Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division II

Opinion delivered December 17, 1986

[Rehearing denied January 21, 1987.]

*346
      *Pilkinton, Pilkinton & Yocum,*by: *Tony Yocum,*for appellant.

*Steve Clark,*Att’y Gen., by: *J. Brent Standridge,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Tom Glaze, Judge.

Appellant appeals from a jury verdict convicting him of aggravated robbery. He was sentenced to twenty years in the Department of Correction. We affirm, as modified, and issue this memorandum opinion pursuant to section (d) of the per curiam *In re Memorandum Opinions,*16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985).

This case is clearly controlled by the supreme court’s recent decision in a companion case. *See Trotter*v. *State,*290 Ark. 269, 719 S.W.2d 268 (1986). *Trotter*was decided on the same facts and evidence presented in the instant case. The court held that the proof did not support the jury’s finding of aggravated robbery. Further, the court held that first degree battery was a lesser included offense of aggravated robbery. We are bound by that decision.

In *Trotter,*the court, quoting *Dixon*v. *State,*260 Ark. 857, 545 S.W.2d 606 (1977), held:

> [i]n this situation we may, depending upon the facts, “reduce the punishment to the maximum for the lesser offense, reduce it to the minimum for the lesser offense, fix it ourselves at some intermediate point, remand the case to the trial court for the assessment of the penalty, or grant a new trial either absolutely or conditionally.”

290 Ark. at 277.

First degree battery is a class B felony punishable by five to twenty years imprisonment. The jury sentenced appellant to twenty years in prison, and we see no reason, based upon the record and evidence presented, to change the length of the sentence under the lesser offense — the same as imposed by the supreme court in *Trotter.*Therefore, we fix appellant’s sentence *347at twenty years for the lesser included offense of first degree battery.

Affirmed as modified.

Cracraft, C.J., and Corbin, J., agree.
No. 45135.

#### Protests 998361-G, etc., of A. W. Fenton Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallingek, J.

As no evidence was offered in support of the claims made and as an examination of the papers in each instance disclosed no reason for disturbing the collector’s action the protests were overruled.
Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 71 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 1 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 71 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 2 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 71 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 3 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 71 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 4 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 71 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 5 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 71 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 6 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 71 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 7 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T18:18:53-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT 10.8


[LOGO]
AEGON


                          AMENDMENT NO 4. TO GUARANTEE

By:

AEGON N.V. (THE "GUARANTOR")

WHEREAS

(A)      Under the terms of that certain Guarantee dated August 1, 2000 renewed
         by Amendment No. 1 to Guarantee, dated November 23, 2000 (the
         "GUARANTEE") executed by the Guarantor, the Guarantor has previously
         agreed to guarantee unconditionally and irrevocably all payments of
         principal, premium (if any) and interest (if any) due in respect of the
         notes issued during the term of the Guarantee as part of the USD
         3,250,000,000 commercial paper program (the "NOTES") of Transamerica
         Finance Corporation (the "ISSUER").

(B)      The Guarantor desires to amend the Guarantee in certain respects.


         NOW THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO GUARANTEE WITNESSES AND IT IS HEREBY
DECLARED AS FOLLOWS:

         1. The third paragraph of the text of the Guarantee shall be amended
and replaced, to read in its entirety as follows:

         The Guarantee shall extend to all Notes issued by the Issuer for the
period from August 1, 2000 until December 31, 2002 (the "DURATION"). The
Guarantee shall continue in full force and effect until all principal, premium
and interest (including any additional amounts required to be paid in accordance
with the Notes) and all other monies payable in respect of each Note issued by
the Issuer during the Duration of this Guarantee have been paid. The Guarantee
may be renewed, in Guarantor's sole discretion, for a specified duration in
order to continue to serve in full force and effect for Notes issued by the
Issuer after the Duration of this Guarantee. Renewal of the Guarantee will
require an amendment to this Guarantee to be issued by the Guarantor on or
before December 15, 2002. In the event that the Issuer is no longer an
affiliated company of Guarantor, this Guarantee shall automatically terminate
and be of no force or effect with respect to all Notes issued subsequent to such
event. Any such termination of this Guarantee shall not affect the rights of any
holders of Notes issued during the Duration while the Issuer was an affiliated
company of Guarantor.

         2. This Amendment No. 4 to Guarantee shall be governed by and construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to
conflicts of law provisions, except to authorization and execution by or on
behalf of the Guarantor which are required to be governed by the laws of The
Netherlands.


<PAGE>


         3. Except as amended hereby, the Guarantee remains in full force and
effect. Any subsequent references to the Guarantee shall mean the Guarantee as
amended hereby.


                                       The Hague, June 14, 2002

                                       AEGON N.V.


                                       By:    /s/ J.B.M. Streppel
                                           ----------------------------
                                       Name:  J.B.M. Streppel
                                       Title: Member Executive Board
KKN/TA CP