alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2031

WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , Defendant

- Appellee

.

No. 18
- 2122

WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , Defendant

- Appellee.

No. 18
- 2331

WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , Defendant

- Appellee.

No. 18
- 2339

WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , Defendant

- Appellee.

No. 18
- 2428

WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , Defendant

- Appellee.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O’Grady , District Judge ; Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge . ( 1:18

- cv
- 00939

- LO

- TCB; 1:18

- cv
- 01149

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : April 30, 2019 Decided: May 17, 2019

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.3 Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
William Lee Grant, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.4 PER CURIAM:
William Lee Grant, II, appeals the district court’s order s dismissing his complaint s as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his motions to amend his complaints . We have reviewed the record s and find that th ese appeal s are frivolous.
Accordin gly, we dismiss the appeal s for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. U.S. Dep’t of Defense , No. 1 :18

- cv
- 00939

- LO

- TCB (E.D. Va. Aug. 20, 2018, Oct. 24, 2018, & Nov. 15, 2018); Grant v. U.S. Dep’t of Defense , No. 1:18

- cv
- 01149

- LMB

- IDD (E.D. Va . Sept. 12, 2018 & Oct. 24, 2018). W e grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in Appeal Nos. 18

- 2031, 18

- 2339, and 18

- 2428. * In addition, we ordered Grant to show cause as to why he should not be sanctioned for filing frivolous appeals and enjoined from filing any further actions in this court unless he pays the sanctions and a district court finds that the a ction is not frivolous. We
find Grant’s response fails to show cause why sanctions and an injunction should not be imposed. Therefore, Grant is sanctioned $500 for filing frivolous appeals and enjoined from filing any further actions in this court unless he pays the sanctions and a district
court finds that the action is not frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* Leave to proceed in forma pauperis has previously been granted in Nos. 18

- 2122 and 18

- 2331.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Air show, U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Air show, U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  159 × 41 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019642791.jpg; 019642791.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7557

AQUIL KHREE WIGGINS, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-1524-1-TSE) Submitted: May 19, 2006 Decided: July 18, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aquil Khree Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* In his motion to amend pleadings, Wiggins argues that Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-654(B)(2) was recently amended, and now provides that “[t]he provisions of this section shall not apply to a petitioner's first petition for a writ of habeas corpus when the sole allegation of such petition is that the petitioner was deprived of the right to pursue an appeal from a final judgment of conviction.” See Va. Legis. Serv. 836 (West 2005). Wiggins argues that under the amended statute, his claims are not procedurally barred because his first petition only alleged that he was deprived - 2 - PER CURIAM: Aquil Khree Wiggins seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of his constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wiggins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Wiggins’ motions for appointment of counsel, to amend pleadings, * and for a certificate ofof his right to appeal. The amendment was approved on March 26, 2005, and went into effect on July 1, 2005. The state refused Wiggins’ second petition on June 10, 2003. The amended statute does not provide that it applies retroactively, nor has the state supreme court ruled that it applies retroactively. Moreover, we must defer to the state court’s application of its procedural bar rules. See Ashe v. Sykes , 39 F.3d 80, 86 (4th Cir. 1994). This claim is accordingly meritless. - 3 - appealability, and we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,030

EX PARTE FRANCISCO NORIEGA-GARCIA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W366-80007-06(HC) IN THE 366TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of three counts of

aggravated sexual assault of a child and one count of indecency with a child and sentenced to life

imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Noriega-Garcia v. State, No.

05-06-00262-CR (Tex. App. – Dallas, March 7, 2007, no pet.) (not designated for publication.)

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of
2

his right to petition for discretionary review pro se.

The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that Applicant was

deprived of his right to file a petition for discretionary review pro se. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d

900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file

an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fifth Court of Appeals in

Cause No. 05-06-00262-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 366-80007-06 from the 366th

Judicial District Court of Collin County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review

with the Fifth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: November 5, 2008

Do not publish
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Steven Vestergaard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Destiny Media Technologies, Inc. for the
year ended August 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Destiny Media Technologies, Inc. (the Company)

| | By:    | /s/ Steve Vestergaard      
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | STEVEN VESTERGAARD         
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
| |        | and Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | November 30, 2006          



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-KSB. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 10934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

(Title)

---
Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 11 Filed: 05/04/12 Page: 1 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 11 Filed: 05/04/12 Page: 2 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 11 Filed: 05/04/12 Page: 3 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 11 Filed: 05/04/12 Page: 4 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00070-EAS-MRA Doc #: 11 Filed: 05/04/12 Page: 5 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T17:58:39-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# C_2008308EN.01000801.xml

| 3.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/8

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

3,25 % on 1 December 2008

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

2 December 2008

(2008/C 308/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2697 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4486 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84695 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5340 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5311 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 290,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9650 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,688 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 261,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8325 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,8195 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,265 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0189 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9602 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5756 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8416 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3804 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9425 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 864,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1230 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7444 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1796 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 871,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6211 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,750 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,4538 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,157 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9546 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2171 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2697

JPY

Japanese yen

118,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4486

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84695

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5340

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5311

ISK

Iceland króna

290,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9650

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,688

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

261,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8325

RON

Romanian leu

3,8195

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,265

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0189

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9602

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5756

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8416

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3804

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9425

KRW

South Korean won

1 864,00

ZAR

South African rand

13,1230

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7444

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1796

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 871,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6211

PHP

Philippine peso

62,750

RUB

Russian rouble

35,4538

THB

Thai baht

45,157

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9546

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2171

---

(1)

1

Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Biella, Jan, DCA <jan.biella@state.nm.us>

Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 1:50 PM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: dmallory@ResoluteEnergy.com; pflynn@ResoluteEnergy.com; dinetahdoo@yahoo.com

Subject: RE: NHPA Consultation - New Mexico Historic Preservation Office

In reviewing the attached documents for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility, I realize that this undertaking is

in Utah and not New Mexico.  It apparently was sent to our office by mistake.   

Jan V. Biella, RPA

Deputy SHPO, NM State Archaeologist

Historic Preservation Division

407 Galisteo Street, Suite 236

Santa Fe, NM 87501

Ph:  505‐827‐4045

Fax: 505‐827‐6338

Cell: 505‐235‐3968

http://nmhistoricpreservation.org

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 4:03 PM 

To: Biella, Jan, DCA 

Cc: dmallory@ResoluteEnergy.com; pflynn@ResoluteEnergy.com; dinetahdoo@yahoo.com; Kelly, Shaheerah 

Subject: NHPA Consultation - New Mexico Historic Preservation Office 

Good afternoon,

Please review the attached documents. Feel free to contact me for questions.

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                             696
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                     51,710
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,553
<PP&E>                                         251,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                 162,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,055
<BONDS>                                         35,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,494
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,543
<SALES>                                         73,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,315
<CGS>                                           71,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,154
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,699)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,772)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,772)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.42)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-K of Dakota
Creek Minerals, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended August 31, 2012, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kathy
Sloan Chief Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Date: January 14, 2013


/s/ Kathy Sloan
---------------------------------------------------------
Kathy Sloan
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains first nine months summary information extracted from the
Thomas Industries Inc. 1995 Third Quarter Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           3,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,218
<INVENTORY>                                     69,917
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,086
<PP&E>                                         150,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,717
<BONDS>                                         71,161
<COMMON>                                        11,456
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     131,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,355
<SALES>                                        373,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,726
<CGS>                                          269,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  269,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                80,968
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   593
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,695
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,166
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,166
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2






CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores S.A. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”). I, Diego Fernando Solano Saravia, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  April 27, 2015




/s/ Diego Fernando Solano Saravia


Diego Fernando Solano Saravia


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)