alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008137EN.01000701.xml

| 4.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/7

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

4,19 % on 1 June 2008

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 June 2008

(2008/C 137/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5593 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4583 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79105 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3408 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,611 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 118,79 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9615 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,84 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 241,48 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7031 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,365 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,62 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,36 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9132 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6272 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,562 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,1702 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9822 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1202 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 587,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,0315 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7982 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,252 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 517,08 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0256 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,212 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,902 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,841 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5267 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0686 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5593

JPY

Japanese yen

163

DKK

Danish krone

7,4583

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79105

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3408

CHF

Swiss franc

1,611

ISK

Iceland króna

118,79

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9615

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,84

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

241,48

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7031

PLN

Polish zloty

3,365

RON

Romanian leu

3,62

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,36

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9132

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6272

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,562

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,1702

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9822

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1202

KRW

South Korean won

1 587,29

ZAR

South African rand

12,0315

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7982

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,252

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 517,08

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0256

PHP

Philippine peso

68,212

RUB

Russian rouble

36,902

THB

Thai baht

50,841

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5267

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0686

---

(1)

1

Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1435

TAWANDA BLAIR, on behalf of JDS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. 

(8:11-cv-01476-RMG)

Submitted: June 18, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tawanda Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tawanda Blair seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order upholding the Commissioner’s decision denying Blair’s 

application for supplemental security income filed on behalf of 

her minor child. The district court referred this case to a 

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 

2006 & Supp. 2011). The magistrate judge recommended that the 

Commissioner’s decision be upheld and advised Blair that failure 

to file timely objections to the recommendation could waive 

appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a 

magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve 

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when 

the parties have been warned of the consequences of 

noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th 

Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Blair

has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after 

receiving proper warning. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. The motion to transfer to Atlanta, Georgia, is denied. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  August 8, 2005

 

 

 

 

/s/ Scott H. Wiscomb

Scott H. Wiscomb,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R06-0AR-2007-0210; FRL - _ 

### Approval and Promulgation ofAir Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions to Emissions Inventory Reporting Requirements and Conformity ofGeneral Federal Actions, Including Revisions Allowing Electronic Reporting Consistentwith the Cross Media Electronic Reporting Rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).


### ACTION: Proposed rule.


### SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Governor ofTexas and by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) respectively on December 17, 1999 and February 26,2007. The revisions pertain to regulations on reporting air pollution emissions (emission inventories), and conformity ofgeneral federal actions to SIPs. EPA is proposingto approve the revision pursuant to section 110 ofthe CAA.


### DATES: Written comments should be received on or before 

### [Insert date 30 

### days from date of publication in the Federal Register].ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand deliver/courierby following the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section ofthe direct final rule located in the rules section ofthis Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emad Shahin, Air Planning Section (6PDL), Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone 214-665-6717; fax number 214-665-7263; e-mail address shahin. emad@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final section ofthis Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct rule withoutpriorproposal because the Agency views this as non-controversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. Ifno adverse comments are received in response to this action no further activity is contemplated. IfEPAreceives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

2

### Foradditional information see the directfinal rule,locatedin the rules sectionof thisFederal Register.



## -1

# J)~I J

## e I --- Dated: Regional Administrator, Region6

3
EXHIBIT 15.1



Board of Directors

Texas Industries, Inc.



We are aware of the incorporation by reference
in the Post-Effective Amendment Number 9 to Registration Statement Number 2-48986 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-53715 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-11604 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-106610 on Form
S-4, and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated March 24, 2004 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Texas Industries, Inc. which are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 29,
2004.



Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not
part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.



/s/    Ernst & Young LLP




April 8, 2004

Dallas, Texas



-36-
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# U.S. Corporations support the arts

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  U.S. Corporations support the arts 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States Information Agency 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States Information Agency 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  151 × 41 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  026190934.jpg; 026190934.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Before the Third Division,

March 20, *1951*

No. 55380.

#### Morris Friedman *v.*United States,

protests 38973-K and 38976-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Tebor, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6707.

Entry No. 762948, etc.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, April 15, 1946, etc.

Certified April 17, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 24, 1946, etc.

(Decided January 6, 1947)

*•Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Boo,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto •■attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by rfche appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the Annual Report of Bona Film Group Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Liang Xu, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.  Date: June 28, 2011  By:
/s/   Liang XuName:
Liang   XuTitle:
Chief Financial Officer 
 *
A   signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the   Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be   retained by the company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
Before the Second Division,

February 17, 1943

No. 48026.

#### Protest 48260-K of Accurate Millinery Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Abstract 47291 the protest was sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of SMTP, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Semyon Dukach, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.

To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered   by the Report.



|                      |                            
|--------------------- | ---------------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2011 | /s/ Semyon Dukach          
|                      |                            
|                      | Semyon Dukach              
|                      |                            
|                      | Principal Executive Officer
(Reap. Dec. 8792)

#### A. Fantis *v.*United States

Entry No. 832770.

(Decided April 24, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

This appeal to appraisement has been submitted for decision, without argument.

There is nothing in the record to overcome the presumption of correctness that attaches to the appraiser's action with respect to the value found for appraisement.

I, therefore, find and hold that the value of the merchandise herein is the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
- FPL_1503ocr-1
- FPL_1503ocr-2
- FPL_1503ocr-3
- FPL_1503ocr-4
- FPL_1503ocr-5
- FPL_1503ocr-6
- FPL_1503ocr-7
- FPL_1503ocr-8
- FPL_1503ocr-9
- FPL_1503ocr-10
- FPL_1503ocr-11
- FPL_1503ocr-12
- FPL_1503ocr-13
- FPL_1503ocr-14
- FPL_1503ocr-15
- FPL_1503ocr-16
- FPL_1503ocr-17
- FPL_1503ocr-18
- FPL_1503ocr-19
- FPL_1503ocr-20
- FPL_1503ocr-21
- FPL_1503ocr-22
- FPL_1503ocr-23
- FPL_1503ocr-24
- FPL_1503ocr-25
- FPL_1503ocr-26
- FPL_1503ocr-27
- FPL_1503ocr-28
- FPL_1503ocr-29
- FPL_1503ocr-30
- FPL_1503ocr-31
- FPL_1503ocr-32
- FPL_1503ocr-33
- FPL_1503ocr-34
- FPL_1503ocr-35
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00286-CV

TAP REALTY, LLC, 62 MAIN STREET,

LLC, CENTER FOR AESTHETIC 

SURGERY, LLC, G & B COLLEYVILLE,

LLC AND VILLAGE OWNERS 

ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellants

V.

NEIGHBORHOOD MANAGEMENT,

INC., Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 352nd District Court

of Tarrant County (352-342154-23)

September 7, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Justice Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
(Reap. Dec. 10249)

#### United States *v.*Frederick Richards, Inc.

Entry Nos. 3945; 54; 282.

(Decided May 15, 1962)

*William S. Orriolc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed above have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> It is stipulated by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of 174 bales of merchandise, in each case, which are invoiced as soft filled sheeting (greige) 40%”, such or similar merchandise was *652freely offered for sale in accordance with the provisions of export value as defined in Section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 at U.S. $0.1515 per lineal yard, less ocean freight, packed.

> That such or similar merchandise is not on the final list published in T.D. 54521, 93 Treas. Dec. 14.

> That this stipulation is limited to the merchandise stated above and the above collector’s appeals for reappraisement are submitted for decision upon the foregoing stipulation of facts.

Upon tbe agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1980, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered by these appeals for reappraisement, invoiced as soft-filled sheeting (greige) 40% inches, and that such value was United States $0.1515 per lineal yard, less ocean freight, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 62 

Directing the Joint Committee on the Library to procure a statue of Rosa 

Parks for placement in the Capitol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2005 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. DODD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Joint Committee on the Library to procure 

a statue of Rosa Parks for placement in the Capitol. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. PROCUREMENT OF A STATUE OF ROSA PARKS. 

4 The Joint Committee on the Library shall procure 

5 a statue of Rosa Parks and cause such statue to be placed 

6 in a suitable location in the Capitol, as determined by the 

7 Joint Committee on the Library. 

8 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES. 

9 The expenses incurred by the Joint Committee on the 

10 Library in carrying out this concurrent resolution shall be 
2 

•SCON 62 IS

1 paid out of the miscellaneous items account within the 

2 contingency fund of the Senate on vouchers approved by 

3 the Joint Committee on the Library and signed by the 

4 chairman and vice-chairman of the Joint Committee. 

Æ
Docket No: FAA-2015-2963 Dir ID: 2015-NM-016-AD

FAA MCAI AD WORKSHEET (CONTINUED)

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 2/2/15

Regional Airline Association 2/2/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 2/2/15

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 2/2/15
# C_2008292EN.01000701.xml

| 14.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 November 2008

(2008/C 292/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2525 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4479 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,8442 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,118 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4917 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 205 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,867 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,293 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7094 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7426 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,8023 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,41 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0486 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9596 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5465 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7071 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2515 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8941 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 740,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,9985 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5546 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1255 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 842,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5071 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,75 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5185 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,828 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9083 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,2136 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2525

JPY

Japanese yen

120,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4479

GBP

Pound sterling

0,8442

SEK

Swedish krona

10,118

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4917

ISK

Iceland króna

205

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,867

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,293

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7094

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7426

RON

Romanian leu

3,8023

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,41

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0486

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9596

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5465

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7071

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2515

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8941

KRW

South Korean won

1 740,35

ZAR

South African rand

12,9985

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5546

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1255

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 842,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5071

PHP

Philippine peso

61,75

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5185

THB

Thai baht

43,828

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9083

MXN

Mexican peso

16,2136

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---