alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007263EN.01000201.xml

| 6.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

4,14 % on 1 November 2007

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

5 November 2007

(2007/C 263/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4488 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 165,39 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4543 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69620 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2580 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6687 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 85,82 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8155 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,975 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,92 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7027 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,6446 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3686 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,290 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7235 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5765 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3527 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2492 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8896 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1013 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 315,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5433 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,8009 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3450 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 271,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8513 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,313 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,7020 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,869 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4488

JPY

Japanese yen

165,39

DKK

Danish krone

7,4543

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69620

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2580

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6687

ISK

Iceland króna

85,82

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8155

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

26,975

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,92

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7027

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,6446

RON

Romanian leu

3,3686

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,290

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7235

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5765

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3527

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2492

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8896

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1013

KRW

South Korean won

1 315,66

ZAR

South African rand

9,5433

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,8009

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3450

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 271,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8513

PHP

Philippine peso

63,313

RUB

Russian rouble

35,7020

THB

Thai baht

45,869

---

(1)

1

Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP
("Texas Eastern") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas C. O'Connor, President of Duke Energy Gas Transmission Services, LLC,
General Partner of Texas Eastern, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Texas Eastern.

/s/ Thomas C. O'Connor
-----------------------------------
Thomas C. O'Connor
President
Duke Energy Gas Transmission Services, LLC
General Partner of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP
November 14, 2002
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9100 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to direct the court to deduct the 

portion of a sentence imposed in violation of law from the upper limit 

of the applicable sentencing guidelines on resentencing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2024 

Mr. GAETZ (for himself and Ms. BOEBERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to direct the court 

to deduct the portion of a sentence imposed in violation 

of law from the upper limit of the applicable sentencing 

guidelines on resentencing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Resentencing Integrity 

5 Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9100 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTIONS FROM SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR 

2 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN VIOLATION OF LAW. 

3 Section 3742(g)(1) of title 18, United States Code, 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘subsection 3553(a)(4), the 

6 court shall apply the guidelines’’ and inserting the 

7 following: ‘‘subsection 3553(a)(4)— 

8 ‘‘(A) except as provided in subparagraph 

9 (B), the court shall apply the guidelines’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end and inserting 

11 ‘‘or’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(B) in the case of a sentence that was im14 posed in violation of law, the court shall apply 

15 the guidelines described in subparagraph (A) 

16 and deduct— 

17 ‘‘(i) the portion of the sentence that 

18 was imposed in violation of law, but not 

19 more than 10 years for each sentence of a 

20 term of imprisonment that was imposed in 

21 violation of law; from 

22 ‘‘(ii) the upper limit of the total sen23 tence that may be imposed pursuant to 

24 such guidelines for all remaining sentences; 

25 and’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4268



# 
H ECTORS ALVADORD ALMASI ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-00-495) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 16, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Leesa Washington, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Hector Salvador Dalmasi appeals his conviction and 108-monthsentence imposed upon his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(A) (West 1999). Dalmasi’s attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising three issues on appeal but stating that, in his view, there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Dalmasi was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has failed to do so. Dalmasi reserved the right to appeal the suppression of evidencefound during a traffic stop. The district court did not err in determining that the stop of Dalmasi’s vehicle was proper based on the undisputed testimony that he had committed several traffic infractions. See, e.g. , Whren v. United States , 517 U.S. 806, 810-19 (1996). Once the vehicle was stopped, there was evidence suggesting that the vehicle contained drugs, so the subsequent search was supported by probable cause. United States v. Jeffus , 22 F.3d 554, 557 (4th Cir. 1994). Our review of Dalmasi’s guilty plea and the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing reveal no error. United States v. DeFusco , 949 F.2d 114, 116- 17 (4th Cir. 1991). This court lacks the authority to review a sentence within a correctly calculated guideline range that results in a sentence within the statutory maximum. United States v. Porter , 909 F.2d 789, 794 (4th Cir. 1990). In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record andhave found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Dalmasi’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform her client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that apetition be filed, but counsel believes that such petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. 2 U NITED S TATES v. D ALMASIWe dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. D ALMASI
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

William & Tammy Sharpe,

Plaintiffs, 

v. Case No. 2:111-cv-926

 JUDGE GRAHAM

PHH Mortgage Corp.,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter came before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for an emergency temporary injunction

of foreclosure eviction, without notice. The eviction, originally scheduled for October 24, 2011, is

scheduled for the week of October 31, 2001. The court conducted an telephone conference with

counsel on October 19, 2011.

Temporary restraining orders are available under Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. They are extraordinary remedies that are governed by the same considerations that a court

must take into account when examining a motion for a preliminary injunction: “(1) whether the movant

has a strong likelihood of success on the merits, (2) whether the movant would suffer irreparable injury

absent a stay, (3) whether granting the stay would cause substantial harm to others, and (4) whether the

public interest would be served by granting the stay.” Ohio Republican Party v. Brunner, 543 F.3d 357,

361 (6th Cir. 2008); see also Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct.

365, 374 (2008).

The crux of plaintiffs’ legal theory for why the eviction should be enjoined is that defendant

made misrepresentations to plaintiffs regarding a loan modification. Plaintiffs believe that they reached

an agreement with defendant lowering their monthly obligation on the mortgage. According to

plaintiffs, defendant brought the foreclosure proceeding in state court and obtained default judgment

despite representing to plaintiffs that they were making the correct monthly payments on their

mortgage.

The court concludes that plaintiffs cannot show a likelihood of success on the merits. Plaintiffs’

Case: 2:11-cv-00926-JLG-NMK Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/19/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
counsel conceded in the telephone conference that he had raised this very issue of defendant’s alleged

misrepresentations in state court as grounds for setting aside the foreclosure judgment. The state court

rejected this argument as sufficient grounds for setting aside the judgment. The doctrine of collateral

estoppel or issue preclusion precludes another court fromrelitigating an issue between parties previously

determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 748-49

(2001); Cobbins v. Tenn. Dep’t of Transp., 566 F.3d 582, 589-90 (6th Cir. 2009); U.S. v. Vasilakos, 508

F.3d 401, 406 (6th Cir. 2007).

Because the state court has already adjudicated the issue that plaintiffs now bring as the basis

for enjoining the eviction, the court DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for an emergency temporary injunction

of foreclosure eviction, without notice (doc. 3).

s/ James L. Graham 

JAMES L. GRAHAM

United States District Judge

DATE: October 19, 2011

2

Case: 2:11-cv-00926-JLG-NMK Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/19/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000097579
<NAME>                        TEXFI INDUSTRIES, INC.
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            OCT-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 JAN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            311
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  33,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                      645
<INVENTORY>                                    18,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               54,639
<PP&E>                                         79,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                 51,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 86,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,551
<BONDS>                                        33,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       34,393
<OTHER-SE>                                    (51,179)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   86,117
<SALES>                                        41,776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               41,776
<CGS>                                          36,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  39,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (897)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (897)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (897)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.4











June 23, 2011




To whom it may concern,




CONSENT




This is to confirm that Intervjubolaget Imri AB conducted consumer surveys commissioned by SodaStream International Ltd. in the following countries as detailed below:




Country

Date of Survey

Number of RespondentsSweden

June 2009

503





The survey questions included the following questions:





1.
Do you have or have you ever had a home carbonation system or a similar appliance in your household? (refer to the past 5 years)


2.
Which make is/was this home carbonation system?





We hereby give our consent to the use of data from the above surveys in the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by SodaStream International Ltd. with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and to the reference in the Annual Report to the name Intervjubolaget Imri AB in connection therewith.





We further consent to the incorporation by reference of this consent, data from the above surveys and references to our name in connection therewith in the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-170299) of SodaStream International Ltd.





[Signature page follows]














Sincerely,





INTERVJUBOLAGET IMRI AB





By:
/s/ Michaela KlenkarName: Michaela KlenkarTitle: Project Manager
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of On the Move Systems Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended  February 28, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Garett Parsons, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: June 13, 2018/s/ Garett ParsonsGarett Parsons, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer)  This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.2

SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Stockslager, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Mark J. StockslagerMark J. StockslagerChief Financial Officer


November 13, 2009
Exhibit 32.1



SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Thornton, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Robert M. Thornton, Jr.Robert M. Thornton, Jr.Chief Executive Officer




February 14, 2006
EX-10.1 EMPLOYMENT LETTER






Exhibit
10.1






Personal & Confidential 


April 28, 2008



Mr. Jean-Marc Germain

Novelis North America

Mayfield Heights, Ohio



Dear Jean-Marc:

I am pleased to offer you the position of President Novelis North America based in Mayfield
Heights, Ohio reporting to me. The initial terms and conditions applicable to your appointment to
this position are as follows:


1. Starting Date

The effective date of this position will be May 15, 2008.


2. Salary

The position of President Novelis North America will have an initial base salary of $325,000
annually. Your compensation will be reviewed again in calendar year 2009.


3. Position Grade

The position of President Novelis North America will be a Grade 48.


4. Annual Incentive Plan

The target opportunity for your position will be 60% of your base salary annually or $195,000. The
performance measures for this plan are based on Novelis business performance objectives.
Depending on the level of the results, the actual bonus for FYE 2009, could be as high as two-times
target or as low as zero.


5. Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

Novelis is in the process of developing a new LTIP for approval by the Novelis Board. You will be
eligible to participate in this new Novelis LTIP and it is anticipated that the target for Grade 48
will be $454,000.



Novelis, Inc.

Lenox Building

3399 Peachtree Road, NE Suite 1500, Atlanta, Georgia 30326




 









 





6. Severance



The severance amount to which you are entitled will be increased to eighteen (18) months of base
pay and target bonus. You will remain at that level until such time that the severance amount for
Region Presidents is reviewed after which you will have the same severance amount as the other
Region Presidents.


7. Tuition Reimbursement

You will be entitled to tuition reimbursement (with tax gross-up) for one-half of the education
expenses for your children for the 2009 — 2010 school year. There will be no reimbursements after
the 2009 — 2010 school year.


8. Benefits

Your Novelis benefits will remain unchanged except that your flex perks amount will be increased to
$11,500.


I trust the above is acceptable to you. If you have any questions about the offer, please feel
free to contact me.


Sincerely,


/s/ Martha Brooks



Martha Brooks

President and Chief Operating Officer




Novelis, Inc.

Lenox Building

3399 Peachtree Road, NE Suite 1500, Atlanta, Georgia 30326
# C_2008140EN.01000602.xml

| 6.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5123 — Autogrill/World Duty Free)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 140/05)

On 16 May 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5123. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5123. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---