# OAR Box 1669 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews

Document

Number: 

# jtf j€jll-E- 8 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/23/20089:36:49AM Sheet 76 of 110 P. 1£FH3 £

O MEMORANDUM 

### A 9813 ^ P. 2

TO : Projec t

Fil e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n NESHA P ES D Projec t

No . 96/0 5 FROM : Bern d Haneke^A- r

Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . DATE : Augus t

13,199 8 P :\n812\meetings\icrmem . wp d 

### i 

### a-p- 1 ; 

# I . F.PAAir- ! JOOKl-i T *""* l

SUBJECT : Minute s ofth e Informatio n Collectio n Reques t Workshop i n Houston , Texa s I . Purpos e Th e purpos e ofthi s meetin g wa s t o provide industr y representative s wit

h aforu mt o as k th e EP A projec t tea mquestion s regardin g th e prope r way s t o respon dt o th e informatio n collectio n reques t

(ICR ) fo r th e organi c liquid s distributio n (OLD ) industry . I n turn , th e workshop provide d th e EP

A projec t tea mwit h a n opportunit

y to identif

y an daddres s proble m area s withi n th e ICR . II . Locatio n Exxo n Compan

y U.S.A . Bel l Street Conferenc e Cente

r 80 0 Bel l Street-Roo mC-10 1 Houston , Texa s 7700 2 Jun e 3 , 199 8 (9:0 0 a

m-1:4 5 pm) III . Participants Industr y Representative s Se e Attachmen

t 1 U.S . Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc

y Stev e Shed

d - OAQPS/ESD/WCPG , Research Triangl e Park , NC Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services . Inc . Bernd Hanek

e - RTP , NC Gre g LaFla

m- RTP , NCP. 3

IC RWorkshop Mem

o Augus t 13,199 8 Pag e 2 IV . Worksho p Agend a Tim e 9:00-9:1 5 9:15-10:2 0 10:20-10:3 5 10:3 5 -10:4 5 10:45-11:4 0 11:40-12:3 0 12:30-1:4 5 Presente r Chuc k Feerick , Bil l Beck , Stev e Shedd Greg LaFla

m Brea k Greg LaFla

m BerndHanek

e Lunch Stev e Shedd , Gre g LaFlam , BerndHanek e V . Worksho p Summar y ICR Instructions Chuc k Feerick opene d th e workshop b y explaining th e facilitie s andsafet y procedure s a

t th e Bel l Street

Conferenc e Center . Next , Bil l Bec k gave abrie f

introductio n t o th e MACT proces s and th e join t

industr y /EP A developmen

t ofth e ICR . Bil l Beck wa s followed b y Stev e Shedd , wh o briefl y discusse dth e Clea

n Air Act , NESHAP development , an d th e purpos e ofth e IC Rworkshop . Mr . Sheddals o tol dworksho p attendee s that

th e deadlin e fo

r respondin g t o th e IC Rha

dbee n extende dt o Augus t

3,1998 , upo n whic h numerou s person s inquire d whethe r extension s beyondtha

t time perio dwoul db e available . Mr . Shed

d indicate d tha

t thi s wa s not

likel y to b e th e case . Followin g Mr . Shedd' s brie f introduction , Greg LaFla

mbega n presentin g andexplainin g a n outlin e ofth e IC Rinstructions . Overhea dslide s (Attachmen

t 2 ) wer e use dt o maintai n th e logica l flo w and consistenc y ofth e presentation . A questio n andanswe r perio dwa s provide d a

t logica l brea k point s durin g th e presentation , an dissue s brough

t up durin g thes e session s ar e discusse d i n thi s document . Mr . LaFla mpresente d slide s 1 throug h 7 , an dthen stoppe dfo

r abrie f questio n an d answe r period . On

e attende e aske d i f

i t woul db e appropriat

e t o submit

tabl e 2 ofth e IC Ra s a Microsof t Excel file, du e to th e fac

t tha t th e infonnatio n requeste dwa s availabl e in tha t format . Th e EP A Projec t Tea mindicate d tha

t woul db e appropriate , a s lon g a s al l informatio n requeste d i n th e officia

l survey' s tabl e wa s provided . Anothe r attende e commente dtha

t th e electroni c IC R wa s only aWordPerfect

o r Adob e file, andtha

t converting it

to M S Wor

dhadchange dth e forma t substantially . Mr . Hanek

e explaine dtha

t converting files fro

mWordPerfec t

t o M S Wor

d coul d chang e th e formatting , bu t tha t i t shoul dno t

b e difficul t t o rectif y thi s situation . One perso n inquire d a s to th e origi n ofth e ICR' s hazardou s ai r pollutant (HAP ) list , to whic h th e EP A projec t tea mresponde d tha

t it i s officiall y fro m4 0 CF R63.2 . It wa s note dtha

t there ha d 

# VP. 4

IC RWorkshop Mem

o Augus t 13,199 8 Pag e 3 bee n change s mad e t o th e HA P lis t ove r time , t o whic h th e EP

A projec t tea mresponde dtha

t th e lates t officia l versio n ofth e HA

P lis t shoul db e used . The final questio n wa s in regar dto th e inclusio n or

exclusio n of

inorgani c HA

P in liquids . Mr . Shed

dresponde dtha

t thi s surve y onl y take s into account

organi c HAP . Followin g th e questio n an d answe r session , slide s 8 through 1 1 wer e presente db y Mr . LaFlam . Thes e slide s addresse d such issue s a s plant emissions , distributio n operations , and example s o f

organi c liquid s distributio n facilit y types . A worksho

p participant

aske di f emission s estimate s shoul d b e base dupo n actua l emission s o

r potential-to-emi t

(PTE) , upo n whic h th e EPA projec t

tea minforme dth e participant

tha t al l estimate s shoul db e base dupo n actua l emissions . Anothe

r participant

aske di f contro l equipmen

t shoul db e factore dinto th e actua l emission s estimates , t o whic h th e projec t tea mansweredtha

t th e estimate s shoul db e "afte r controls" , an d tha

t all contro l equipmen

t (unles s dedicatedfo

r us e unde r anothe r MACT rule ) shoul d b e describe d in Tabl e 9 ofth e IC Rpackage . On e participant

aske di f reactor vessel s shoul d b e include d unde

r compoundin g operations . The EP A projec t tea mreplie dtha

t reactor vessel s are aproces s and no t par t ofth e distributio n process , an dwoul dtherefor

e no t hav e t o b e covere d i n th e survey . Mr . LaFla mthe n proceede d to presen t slide s 1 2 through 1 4 i n which issue s such a s organi c liquid s t o b e surveyed , wast e andwastewate

r to b e surveyed , andnon-surveye dliquid s wer e discussed . A brie f

discussio n ensue dregardin g th e 0. 5 millio n gallo n per yea r wastewate

r cutoff . One attende e asked i f

tha t cutof f pertaine dt o all wastewate

r a t afacility , o r

only t o tha

t portio n belongin g t o OLD . The EP A project tea mrespons e wa s tha

t al l wastewate

r a t aplant sit e wa s to count

towar d th e 0. 5 millio n gallo n cutoff , but onl y th e wastewate

r fro mth e OL D facilit y woul d hav e t o b e quantifie d i n th e tables . Anothe r participan t inquire da s to whic h measur e o f vapo r pressure wa s t o b e use di n th e applicabilit y determinations , t o whic h th e EP A projec t tea mreplie d tha

t tru e vapor

pressur e (tvp ) i s th e appropriat

e parameter . Slide s 15-1 9 wer

e presente dnex

t b y Mr . LaFlam . Thes e slide s discusse dth e applicabilit

y o f variou s MACT standards , includin g th e Marine Vessel Operation s MACT , th e Hazardou s Organi c NESHAP , and th e Refiner y MACT . Numerou s question s wer e brought up a s aresult o f thes e slides , an

d man y o f thes e ar e discusse din Attachmen

t 3 . Som e ofth e majo

r issue s include d adiscussio n abou t th e ter m"distribution" , an

dwhethe r liquefiedgase s shoul db e include d i n th e survey . It

wa s als o askedi f

unloadin g operation s ar

e pertinent t o thi s ICR , due t

o th e fact that unloadin g doe s no t

generat e emissions . Mr . Shed

dresponde dtha

t a n immediat

e answe r t o thi s wa s no t

available , bu t

adecisio n woul d b e mad

e promptly . Afte r acoffe e break , Mr . LaFla

mproceede dto presen

t slide s 20-21 , i

n which such issue s a s MAC T standard s tha

t had no t bee n promulgated , a s well a s MACT standard s tha t wer e no t discusse d i n slide s 1 5 throug h 1 9 wer e discussed . Mr . LaFla

mals o briefl

y discusse dwha

t informatio n woul d hav e t o b e submitte dfo r operation s an

dequipmen

t covere dunde

r other fina l 

# 3P. 5

IC RWorkshop Mem

o Augus t 13,199 8 Pag e 4 o r non-fina l MACT standards . Numerou s participant s commente dtha t creatin g aplo t

pla n showin g non-OL

D operation s woul dentai l man y hour s o f work , andwoul dprovid e onl y limite d information . A brie f

discussio n ensuedas t

o th e level o f

detai l require dfo

r th e plo t plans , and Mr . Shed d note d tha

t adetaile d sketch woul dsuffice . Th e EP A project tea mnote dtha

t thi s informatio n i s require d t o enabl e th e tea mto understan dth e entire facilit y andt o gai n knowledg e abou t operation s i n th e organi c liquid s distributio n industry . Issue s pertainin g t o gasolin e an dgasolin e operation s a

t surveyedfacilitie s were discusse d b y Mr . LaFla

min slide s 22-24 . I t

was notedtha

t gasolin e transfer s tha

t serv e t o refue

l vehicle s o r equipmen t withi n th e plant

site shouldno t

b e reporte di n th e surve

y response . Som

e participant s commente d tha t they considere dthi s to b e inappropriat e a s gasolin e transfer s coul d b e considere d t o b e organi c liqui d distributio n operations . ICR Tables Followin g Mr . LaFlam' s presentatio n ofth e IC Rinstructions , Mr . Hanek e bega n a discussio n ofth e individua l table s withi n th e ICR . Mr . Hanek e presente doverhea

d transparencie s ofth e tables , discusse dth e require dinformatio n fo r eac h table , an dthe n answere d question s (jointly wit

h Gre g LaFla

man dStev e Shedd) regardin g eac h tabl e fro mth e worksho p participants . Followin g th e brie f

discussio n o

f Tabl e 1 , numerou s participant s raise dissue s regardin g th e surveye d liquids . Som

e participant s questione dth e applicabilit y ofth e require ddata , statin g tha t i t woul d no t b e necessar

y or pertinen t in man y cases . The EP

A projec t tea mresponde d tha

t th e bes t availabl e informatio n shoul db e supplied , an dtha t i n mos t case s th e informatio n woul d b e necessar

y t o calculat

e emissions . Furthermore , th e tea madded , mos t

ofthi s informatio n wa s necessar y a s th e TANKS3. 1 progra monly include s asmal l subset o f organi c liquids , an dth e requeste d informatio n woul d b e neededfo r emission s calculations . On e participant

note d tha t Rei d vapor

pressur e (RVP ) woul d onl

y b e availabl e fo

r certai n petroleumproducts , to whic h th e EP A projec t tea mresponde d tha

t th e surve y ha dbeen designe dwit

h numerou s liqui dtype s i n mind , an d therefor e certai n parameter s ma

y b e inapplicabl e fo

r som e respondents . Table s 2 and 3 di d no t

generat e substantia

l questions , ands o adetaile ddiscussio n i s no t include d in thi s memorandum . Numerou s question s wer e aske dregardin g Table s 4 and5 (Wastewate

r Flo w and Drai n Control , Wastewate r Collectio n andTreatment) . On e participant aske d i f th e principa

l source s of

wastewate

r generatio n woul donly hav e to include thos e fro m th e OL D portio n o f

afacility . Th

e EP A project tea maffirme dthi s conclusion . One participant inquire d a s t o th e definitio n o f adrain , t o which th e projec t tea mrefene dth e perso n to th e languag e ofth e Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON) . A workshop participant

note dtha t th e Resourc e Conservatio n andRecover y Ac t (RCRA ) 

# HP. 6

IC RWorkshop Mem

o Augus t 13,199 8 Pag e 5 wa s goin g t o cove

r mos t ofth e sludge s produce d(refe r to Tabl e 6 ) a

t facilities , andtha

t th e EP A projec t tea mwoul d therefor

e no t nee dthi s information . Th e EP A projec t tea mresponde d b y acknowledgin g thi s fact , and replie dtha t sludge s regulate dby RCR

A shoul dno t

b e reporte d in th e survey . Equipment

lea k informatio n wa s presente danddiscusse da s i t pertain s t o Tabl e 7 . A participant

inquire d whethe

r alea k detectio n andrepair

(LDAR ) progra mha dto b e prescribe d b y aforma l regulatio n in orde

r to b e addresse din thi s table . Mr . Shed dresponde dtha

t aforma l progra mwoul d b e require d t o trigger th e applicabilit

y ofth e table . I n Tabl e 8 , Mr . Hanek

e reiterate dth e fac

t tha t infonnatio n o n th e familie s o f blend s woul d b e acceptable , thereb y reducin g th e volume of information returne din th e survey . Mr . Hanek e als o state d tha

t th e EP A wante dconcise , 2 t

o 3 paragraph response s fo

r Par t I I o f Tabl e 8 . N o comment s or

question s wer

e aske dabou

t Tabl e 9 (Ai

r Pollutio n Contro l Equipmen t Parameters) . Th e projec t

tea mmentione dthat

th e table s shouldb e fille dout wit h th e bes t availabl e information , an d tha t i f apiec e o f essentia l contro l equipmen

t wa s no t include d i n th e survey , th e respondent

shoul d fill out

atabl e simila

r to th e one s presented . Question and

Answer Session The EP A projec t tea mrequeste dtha

t participant s plac e extraquestion s o n index card s s o tha t they coul d b e addresse d durin g thi s par t ofth e workshop . A numbe r ofth e card s (bu t

no t all ) receive d were rea

d and responde dt o durin g thi s session . Question s generate db y answerin g th e card s wer

e als o fielded. Attachmen

t 3 provide s asummar

y ofth e issue s andquestion s brought up durin g th e firs t

par t ofth e workshop , an

ddurin g the final questio n an danswe r session . VI . Conclusio n Followin g th e questio n and answe r session , th e EP

A projec t tea mindicate dtha

t th e EP A woul d b e postin g som

e ofth e principa

l an dmos t frequentl y askedissue s an

dquestions , alon g wit h th e EPA' s answer s and comments , o n th e TT N website . Followin g som e concludin g remarks , th e projec t

tea mthanke d th e workshop attendee s fo r thei r time andparticipation , and th e meetin g wa s adjourned . 

# 5P. 7

ATTACHMEN

T 1



# 6P. 8

Attendanc e Roste r fo r th e Join tEPA & Industry Worksho p o n th e Informatio n CoUectio n Reques tfo r th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) Industry—Jun e 3,199 8 Exxo n Conference Center-80 0 Bel l Street , Houston , T X Nam e o f Attende e Do n Mar k Anthon y Jorda n Jacobse n Alic e Boomhowe r Bo b Hermanso n Ti m Weisenberge r JudyMund t Miria m Lev-O n Denis e Michelso n Ed J . Bergman Paul Hun t Richar d Langfor d Roge r Towe r RobertC . Walke r Dav e Monfor e Georg e H . Got

t Rober tA . Morri s Terr y Soul e Da n Rhin e Jo e Ledvin a Milin d J . Bhatte W.L . Wamement , Sr . E d Guirovic h Be n Strang e Bmc e Alexiu s Lian e Plat

t Tob y Three t Vanc e Dan

* Emil y Montgomery Thoma s Jackso n Sharo n Hampto n Ji m Schlembac h Brian Magrude r Chuc k Feeric k Rowlan d Iv y Norman Morro w Rochell e M . Jozwia k Mik e Innerarit

y Mar k Pik e Mik e McWilliam s G.C . Sha h Compan y

Alyesk a Pipelin e Alyesk a Pipelin e Amoc o Amoc o Corp Amoc o Amoc o ARC O ARC O Pip e Lin e BAS F Corp . Celanes e Engineerin g Resins , Inc . Celanes e Acetat e Celanes e Chevro n Citg o Citg o Petroleum Th e Coastal Corp . Coastal Refinin g Coastal Refinin g CONDE A Vist a Co . Conoc o Crow n Centra

l Pe t Delt a Termina

l Service s Delt a Termina

l Service s Do w Chemical Compan y Do w Chemical Compan y Do w Chemical Compan y Eastma n Chemical Co . Eastma n Chemica l Equilo n Enterpris e LL C ERM-Southwes t Exxo n Exxo n Pipelin e Exxo n Exxo n Exxo n Chem . Amer . Exxo n Chemical Exxo n Exxo n Pipelin e Exxo n Fina Oi l and Chemica l Emai l jacobsenje@alyeska-pipeline.co m aeboomhower@amoco.co m rwhermanson@amoco.co m timouiyJ_weisenberger@amoco.co m jrmundt@amoco.co m mlevon@mail.arco.co m ztcdcm@mail.arco.co m bergmaej@basf-corp.co m whunt@bishopfacility.co m rlangfor@wpo.acc.co m ret@clkhccl.hcc.co m rcwa@chevron.co m dmonfor@citgo.co m geogott@citgo.co m robeit.morris@coastaIcoip.co m teny.soule@coastalcorp.co m dan.rhine@coastalcorp.co m jledvina@cvc.ne tco m milind.j.bhatte@usa.conoco.cor a williamw33@aol.co m balexius@dow.co m lmplatt@dow.co m vrdarr@eastman.com emont@eastman.co m jacksth@texaco.co m jim.schlembach@exxon.sprintco m chuck.p.feerick@exxon.co m rowland.d.ivy.exxon.sprint.co m nonnanl.morrow@exxon.sprin tco m rochelle.m.jozwiak@exxon.sprintco m mikal.s.innerarity@exxon.sprintco m mark.c.pike@exxon.sprintco m mike.s.mcwilliams@exxon.sprint.co m £.c.shah(2)fina.co m 

# 1P. 9

Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-gasoline ) IC RWorksho p Attendanc e Roste r Nam e o f Attende e Pradee p Shett

y Mar y Logu e Kevi n Bloome r Ushr a Mehr

a Stephe n V . Capone Lo n Tullo s Joe l Fazzi o Gin a Christia

n Ji m Sebastian Dal e Rhoade s Barbara Castleberr

y Gar y Wilso n Willia m G . Moore Dav e Elde r Kathlee n Bowde n Laur a An n Dresse r Justi n Stubb e Bil l Bec k Thoma s Lan

d Stephe n S . Tucker Scot tHartma

n Da n Gresha

m Joh n M . Edgingto n D.T . Emer

y Steve n R . Hanse

n Paul Zawil a Le e Nettervill e Jack Coblen z Charle s F . Hamilton Odess a R . Marshal l Rebecc a Demete r Crai g Alliso n Ha l Tabac k John Nesse r Marte n Most s Alla n A . Grigg s Dan a Neel y 1 Do n Wan " Compan y Fin a Oi l & Chemical Fina Oi l and Chemical Company FIN A Oi l & Chemical GAT X G E Plastic s Huntsman Petrochem . lMTT Intercontinental Terminal s Corp . Intercontinental Terminal s Corp . LaGlori a Oi l an d Ga s Loui s Dreyfus s Marathon Oi l Maratho n Ash . Pe t Maratho n Ashlan d Petr . LL C Maratho n Ashlan d Petroleum Mobi l Beaumon tRef

. Mobi l Oi l Corp . Mobi l Corp . Pakhoe d Corp . PetroUnite d Term . Phillip s Pe tCo . Phillip s Petroleu m Phillip s Chemical Co . Phillip s Petroleum Shel l Chemica l Co . Soluti a Inc . Sourc e Environmental Science s Sourc e Environmental Science s Southwes tSolvent s and Chemical s

Star Enterpris e Star Enterpris e Stolthaven-Housto n Tabac k (fo r API ) Texa s Petrochemical s Corp . Ultramar Diamon d Shamroc k Ultramar Diamon d Shamroc k Unio n Carbide Unio n Carbid e Emai l pradeep.shetty@fina.co m mary.logue@fina.co m kevin.bloomer@fma.co m mehrau@gatx.co m stephen.capone@gepex.ge.co m lon_tullos@huntsman.co m joelfezzio@imtt.co m Taas4990swbell.ne t Taas4990swbell.ne t castlbm@ldena.co m grwilson@marathonoil.co m wgmoore@mapllc.co m addelder@mapllc.co m ktbowden@mapllc.co m laura_a_dresser@emailjnobil.co m justin_k_stubbe@emailjnobiI.co m bill_r_beck@email.mobil.co m Paktank@pakhoedcorp.co m stucker@petrounited.co m saha@bvmex.ppco.co m drgresh@bvemx.ppco.co m jmed@ppco.co m dtemery@bvemx.ppco.co m srhansen@shellus.co m paul.w.zawila@solutia.co m source@pdq.ne t source@pdq.ne t hambone2@flash.ne t raarshor@starentcom demetrm@starent.co m callison@stolt.co m taback@ix.netcom.co m jnesser@txpetrochem.co m marten_mosis@udscorp.co m allan_griggs@udscorp.co m neelydm@ucarb.co m wanedlfilucarb.co m _

%P.1 0

ATTACHMEN

T 2



# ° lP.1 1

7 • *r*i 

# Organic Liquids Distribution

(OLD) NESHAP muggguugg i 

### £/.£ . EPA/Industry Workshop on OLD Information Collection Request

(ICR)

Exxo n Conferenc e Cente r 80 0 Bel l Stree t Houston , Texa s Jun e 3,199 8



# * £ \l!k Workshop Agenda mmmammMmmmmm Registration-8:30 - 9:00 am Introduction (Steve Shedd/EPA) - 9:00-9:15 Review Instructions/Questions — 9:15 -10:15 • Break-10:15-10:30 Review Tables/Questions -10:30- 11:30

• Lunch -11:30 - 12:30 pm Question/AnswerSession — 12:30 - 1:15 Workshop Wrap-Up -1:15 - 1:30 

# 0P.1 2



# M ICR Contacts -•m^mTmmtmmMmmtfm<r.rmtimim*nmmmam__i_m Steve Shedd- U.S.EPA • Telephone: (919)541-5397 • E-mail: shedd.steve@epa.gov

• Greg LaFlam/Bernd

Haneke —Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. • Telephone: (919) 941-0333 • E-mail: glaflam@rtp.pes.com QI bhaneke@rtp.pes.com u Updates posted

on the TTN

Website at:

. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t3sp.html

- 0jPV^. • ?#*•* *

. tf • • 0, 1 

# ICR History The ICR was developed

jointly by the project Work Team (U.S. EPA, PES, Inc., and industry representatives). Trade Groups: API, CMA, ILTA, NACD, NTTC. Industry comments and

suggestions were incorporated

into the final version ofthe ICR.



# wP.1 3



# ource Category Description Source Category Includes:

• Storage and

transfer of non-gasoline organic liquids with hazardous air

pollutant (HAP) content.

• Distribution

facilities after

the point of custody transfer (no oil/natural

gas production or

processing operations). a_

•.o r * 

# ICR Instructions -•'•^'''""'pii'''^*'"""^-*^ ^ jtaiMMJiMfiiiiMH- M All responses should

be based

on Calendar

Year 1997data. Responses are due by July 8.1998.

Note: These slides present a summary

for presentation purposes. Respondents must

follow the complete instructions provided in the ICR itself. 

# \1"P.1 4



# i-^ 5 ICR Instructions (2) S B 

## Two OptionsforCompleting the Survey: • Fill out and return the papercopy, using blank tables and

extra sheets as necessary; OR:

• Download

the electronic version ofthe survey on the EPA's TTN

website at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t3sp.html and return paper

copy and diskette.



# i&a H I^R Instructions (3) v&i< __W_m_m__m____m 

### What Size, plants must

complete the Survey? Plant sites that have actual

emissions of

5 tpy orgreaterof

a single HAP, or; Plant sites that have actual

emissions of

12.5 tpy orgreaterof

a combination of

HAP. 

# | 3P.1 5

<-*c* r 

# ICR Instructions (4) tStKidHf mam "'•^''^-•"•'•*- w ***^-" ' 

### If a plant site has actual

emissions <5 tpy of a single HAP; and

<12.5 tpy of

a combination of

HAP:

• The plant

site will not have to respond

to the survey. • However, report

this finding in writing to the EPA.



# > 3{ f 1 ICR Instructions (5) ^^a*^**TM******^*********!*,^^ 

### Distribution Operations Include: • Incoming and

outgoing transfers • Storage • Associated

equipment • Waste and

wastewater

treatment

and disposal practices

• Compounding/blending/packaging activities.

10



# HP.1 6

, * - - - <

N " J f \" 5 " ~ "**-« 3 

# ICR Instructions (6) Examples of

OLD Facility Types: Distribution Terminals (separate) Pipeline Facilities Compounding/Blending/Packaging Facilities Collocated

Distribution Facilities 11

.y -J?- - 

# , ^ ICR Instructions (7) 11 5 ...m Organic Liquids to be Surveyed:

• Organic Liquids with a HAP content of 1,000 ppmw orgreater, AND

• A True VaporPressure of 0.1 psia orgreater.

12

\ & 

### 6P.1 7

. *» , f_i , . ' *->•** " 

# /Ci ? Instructions (8)

' z:w»«*mmM 

### U Organic Liquid Waste and

Wastewater

to (____• • be Surveyed: • Plant sites that generate a total

of 0.5 miUion gallons peryear

ormore of

HAP wastewater (excluding segregated

stormwater).

• All semi-aqueous HAP-containing waste (sludge) from distribution equipment or operations.

13

'-•«'.»• * *'- J 

# ICR Instructions (9) Non-Surveyed

Organic Liquids and Wastes: Must be generally described

and quantified . A volume throughput

for each ofthe nonsurveyed liquids is not

required.

u 

# \VP.1 8



# ICR Instructions (10) Marine Vessel

Operations: Marine vessel

loading operations subject to the Marine Vessel MACT (40 CFR 63, subpart

Y) aiejtQLsubject to the survey Marine tank

vessel terminals that

only load orunload product with HAP

content do not have to complete the survey; bj__t Are subject

to the survey if

they store HAP-containing liquids on site (i.e., in storage vessels). 15 

# ICR Instructions (11) mmtmmmm mmimmmmmmmmm mmmmimummmmmmmmmtsmmimmmm Marine Tank Vessel

operations at

plant sites with otherHAP

emission sources must:

- Show the marine vessel loading operations on a general plot plan: • Provide a written description ofthe marine vessel loading operations; • Fill in the marine vessel

loading operation data in wastewaterand waste Tables 4, 5, and

6. • Provide data on each airpollution control device that

is not dedicated to the marine vessel

loading operations (Table 9).

16 

# n 8P.1 9

i • _, V** ' 

# ICR Instructions (12) Information Required

forChemical Manufacturing Facility Plant Sites: A general

plot plan indicating which storage vessels and loading arms and racks are regulated

under the Hazardous Organic NESHAP

(HON) or

another MACT rule. For storage vessels and

loading raclcsfor

which data are supplied in Tables 2 and

3, fill out Table 1, but

do not fill out Tables 4-8. In Table 2, list

the presence (but

not the requested

data) of all distribution storage vessels Ml regulated

by another

MACT.

17



### s 

# ^ » ICR Instructions (13) Information Required

forChemical 

## FK^ H Manufacturing Facility Plant Sites (2):

• Table 3 (and

Table 9 as applicable) for each loading rack, arm, or

hose that loads surveyed liquids and

is not assigned to a regulated process unit

or is not a tank farm rack

subject to the HON

or another MACT.

18 

# l «P.2 0



# ICR Instructions (14) Information Required

forPetroleum Refineries:

• A plot plan that shows which storage vessels are regulated under the Refinery MACT.

. Table 1 (but

not Tables 4-8) must

be filled out for storage vessels and loading racks

for which data are supplied

in Tables 2 and

3. • Table 2 must

list the presence of

all distribution storage vessels not regulated

by another

MACT. • Table 3 (and

Table 9, as applicable) must be filled out for each loading rack

and arm that loads surveyed

liquids otherthan gasoline into tank

trucks or railcars.

19 

# ICR Instructions (15) tmmtmmtm "-~-*«- * ««ffitfil«M» ^ 

### Other MACT Standards

• Final MACT standards discussed

in the original instructions include: Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON), Gasoline Distribution, Marine Vessel Loading, and

Refinery MACT.

• For this survey, respondents may exclude distribution storage vessels, loading racks, and loading arms clearly regulated

underany

final ornon-final

MACT but must identify the equipment

as follows: 20 

# rt 10P.2 1

-*-?,>.•, , ri7' \ "* * C- " ****** * > ** i

> . > . * ; _• 

# ICR Instructions (16) OtherMACT

Standards (2):

. On the plotplan. show which storage vessels and loading arms and racks are regulated

under a final or non-final MACT, and identify the MACT

standard on each piece of

equipment. Publicly available written information must support determinations of

nonfinal MACT coverage.

• "Regulated"

vessels, loading arms, and racks can include those that are otherwise subject

to the MACT, but

are not in fact controlled

because they do not

meet the control

criteria (small tank, etc.) given in the subject MACT.

21 

# ICR Instructions (17) _t__s___m__mm___m_M 

### Gasoline and

Gasoline Operations/Facilities that do not need to be surveyed:

• Bulk Gasoline Terminals and Pipeline Facilities that: —handle only Gasoline, and/or —handle Organic Liquids that qualify as non-surveyed

liquids.

22 

## ^0 11P.2 2



# ICR Instructions (18) _m Gasoline and

Gasoline Operations at

Surveyed Facilities: • All gasoline products (including aviation gasoline) must be partially surveyed

at all facilities that

are responding.

• Provide a brief

written description of

gasoline operations.

• Provide gasoline information in the storage, transfer, equipment leak, and control equipment sections (Tables 1,2,3,7, and 9) unless the equipment

is: —in dedicated

gasoline service, or -regulated

under the Gasoline Distribution MACT

2 3 

# ICR Instructions (19) •Htt_m_m _____TM_~^r^^^*~_~~.*~~.~.*-.~~u00 . 

### Gasoline and

Gasoline Operations at

Surveyed Facilities (2):

• Equipment

in dedicated

gasoline service or

regulated

by the Gasoline Distribution orRefinery MACT must be shown on the plotplan(s), and

generally described

as requested

• Gasoline information must be included in wastewater

and waste Tables 4,5, and

6.

24 

# l\ 12P.2 3



# ICR Table Instructions Table 1: Organic Liquids Stored or Transferred

• Entera name

foreach HAP

containing organic liquid stored or unloaded at the OLD facility; • Liquid must meet criteria presented

in survey;

. Do not include wastewater; • List HAP constituents;

. For liquids referenced

in Table 8, the

family name ofthe liquid may be used

in lieu of listing each mdividual

blend.

25 

# ICR Table Instructions (2)

- v ^j j g^^ j ^^^^^^^g^^^^^^^^^^^^^^S^Si_^_^S^S_mmmBi^BB_.

_ t" ~ 

### Table 2: Storage Tanks

• Enter a unique identifiercode (e.g, TOJ or TOO!)for

each storage tank with greaterthan 5,000 gallon capacity; • List organic liquids

from Table 1 stored

in each tank

during the base year; • Use the same liquid

names/codes

from Table 1; • For each Add-On Control

Device used

to control vapor emissions from storage tanks,

fill out Table 9; • Fill out a separate table

for each device listed in Table 9.

2. 

# n> 13:^.1 s



## fc_^__| 

# ICR Table Instructions (3) Table 3: TransferOperations Enter each loading rack/arm that transfers organic liquids listed in Table 1 to tank

trucks, railcars, barges, or tanker ships; Fill out Table 9 for each control

device used

to control

vapor emissions from liquid

transfers. P.2 4

27 

# P,rSiiICR Table Instructions (4) mmMmmmmmmmmmmmmmu S^ . TMi\ 

### I able 4: WastewaterFlow and Drain Control List the principal

sources of

wastewatergeneration from distribution activities; Use the supplied

codes or your own code and

description; Estimate the annual

flow rate from each source; Include the HAP

constituents and

their concentrations in ppmw or mg/l.

2 8



# ^ 3 14P.2 5



# ICR Table Instructions (5)

•""•••*''' g ^ ^ 

### Table 5: Wastewater

Collection and

Treatment Control For each wastewater

source as listed

in Table 4, list

the number

of collection or

treatment units applicable to each source; Fill out Table 9 for each control

device used

to control

air emissions from wastewater.

2 9 

# ICR Table Instructions (6) _m__mmmmm 

### Table 6: Semi-Aqueous Waste Identify each individual

type of waste from distribution activities that contains any HAP, and

provide information on how the waste is collected

and treated; Fill out Table 9 for each control

device used

to control

air emissions; Semi-aqueous waste (i.e., sludge) is defined as having between 10- 90percent

solids.

30 

# •l A 15P.2 6

••QuMtek 

# ICR Table Instructions (7) Table 7: Equipment

Leaks Leak detection and

repair(LDAR) programs involve a formal leak survey of

equipment

components on a

fixed schedule (may be instrument

orvisual detection); Fill out Table 9 foreach control

device used

to control

vapor embsions from equipment components.

31 

# :^^ICR Table Instructions (8) •mtmmm 

### Table 8: Compounding/Blending/Packaging Operations

- This table applies to

facilities that

mix liquids together

to form a blend or product;

• List each separate blend

orchemical

product name;

. Families of

blended products may be combined into a single entry in this table.

32



# l£ 16P.2 7

'•___ ! 

# ICR Table Instructions (9) Table 9: AirPollution Control Equipment

• Complete the applicable section of Table 9 for each air pollution control device in use at

the OLD facility; • F/7 / in the requested

parameters, if

known; • If the parameters are not known identify the presence ofthe device by including a table showing the type of device and

the emission source that

it controls; • Be specific when listing the emission sources; e.g., Tanks 1,2,3; or Loading Racks 1-5, etc.

33 

# ICR Contacts p j i >-•mitiriT"t i -'•"'ttn M tmmismmmtmma Steve Shedd

— U.S. EPA • Telephone: (919) 541-5397 • E-mail: shedd.steve@epa.gov Greg LaFlam/Bernd

Haneke — Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.

• Telephone: (919) 941-0333 • E-mail: glaflam@rtp.pes.com QL bhaneke@rtp.pes.com Updates posted

on the TTN

Website at. • http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t3sp.html 34



# nJ* 17P.2 8

ATTACHMEN

T 3



# S\P.2 9 Question s Receive d an d Answere d o n Notecard s a tth e Organi c

Liquid s Distributio n Worksho p 1 . Ho w di d yo u d o suc h agoo djo b o n thi s survey ? Answer : Th e surve y integrate dindustr y comment s an dsuggestions . * 2 . Doe s Tabl e 8 (Compounding/Blending/Packagin g Operations ) hav e t o b e complete d fo r gasolin e terminal s becaus e additive s are blended ? (Additive s with HAPs) . Answer : Thi s issu e wil l b e revisited , answe r wil l mos t likel y b e poste do n EPA' s TT N website . 3 . Doe s th e IC Rcover th e loadin g o f

HAP containin g mixture s that ar e gaseou s a t

ambien t temperature ? Answer : Gase s wil l no t

b e controlle db y th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n NESHAP . 4 . Tabl e 8 (Compounding/Blending/Packagin g Operations ) - I f blendin g occur s i n gasolin e MAC T tanks , i s informatio n require dt o b e reporte do n Tabl e 8? : Answer : I f

th e tank s are covere db y anothe r MACT , the n th e answer

i s no . 5 . A t apetroleu mrefiner

y - tan k water draw s are route dt o th e facility-wid e wastewater collectio n and treatmen t

system . Th e specifi c tank i s no t subjec t t o th e refiner

y MACT , bu t th e wastewater

collectio n an dtreatment

systemi s subjec t

t o th e refiner

y MAC T (an d complie s throug h complianc e wit h th e Benzene Wast

e Operation s NESHAP) . D o yo u wan t tan k water draw informatio n i n th e wastewate r sectio n ofth e ICR ? Answer : Yes , bu t

w e wil l no t

requir e specifi c information . 6 . Ca n yo u pos t adocumen

t wit h answer s t o question s o n th e Internet ? Answer : Th e mos t

pertinent question s an

dissue s wil l b e poste do n th e TT N website . 7 . Are pressurize d liquid s (either loade do r unloaded ) covered ? e.g. , viny l chloride , butadiene , methylen e chloride . Answer : Thi s questio n wil l b e revisite dan danswer s poste do n th e TT N website . 8 . I s ther e an

y cutof f fo r loadin g rac k

throughput

(d e minimis) ? Answer : There i s n o d e minimi s cutof f fo r loadin g rac k

throughput . 1 

# 0 3P.3 0

9 . A loadin g ar

mhandle s aHO N regulate dchemica l wit h control s andnon-HO N chemical s (HAPs ) wit

h n o controls , (a ) Shoul dth e non-HO N portio n b e reporte dhere ? (b ) Wha t i f the y were controlled ? Answer : (a) Repor

t th e non-HO N chemicals , (b ) Repor t liquid s i n th e appropriate table s an d contro l equipment

i n Tabl e 9 . 10 . Pleas e confir

mou r understandin g tha

t packagin g o f

non-blende dor

non-compounde d material s are no t

include d o n th e survey ? Answe r I f the y contai n HAP , the n they mus t b e reporte di n th e survey . 11 . Shoul d ballas t

water receive dfro

mmarin e vessel s b e include di n survey ? Answer. : Yes , bu t

thi s issu e wil l b e revisited . 12 . Pleas e addres s th e issu e o f ocean barge s - ship s Ocea n barge s are configure dlike ship s - hav e container s th e siz e andshap e o f ships , trave l i n th e ocea

n lik e ships . For

th e purpos e ofthi s survey , are ocea n barge s t o b e considere d barge s or

ships ? Answer : Thi s doe s no t

appl y t o th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n NESHAP . 13 . Ca n w e retur n a n electroni c repl y converte dinto Wor dfo r window s insteado f WordPerfect ? Answer : Yes , retur

n hardcop y an ddiskette wit h file . 14 . I f amarin e loadin g operatio n (wit h tanks ) i s smalle

r tha n th e majo r sourc e threshol d (10/2 5 tpy ) o f

subpar t Y an di s therefor

e no t require d to b e controlled , doe s i t hav e t o complete th e ICR ? Answer : I f

i t ha s actua l emission s greate

r than th e 5/12. 5 tp y HA

P cutoff , the n yes . 15 . Sourc e categories : you sa y n o oil/natura

l ga s productio n o r

processin g operation s are included . However , th e definitio n o f custod y transfe r i n th e propose dOi l an dNatural Ga s Productio n MACT say s custod y transfe r i s th e inlet

t o anatura

l ga s plant , a ) D o yo u stil l inten d tha

t w e ar e no t t o include ga s plants ? Also , natura l ga s liquid s are ofte

n a produc t of natura l ga s processing ; b ) ar

e th e facilitie s associate dwit h sale s o f NGL covered ? Answer : (a) . Natura

l ga s plant s ma

y potentiall y b e covere db

y anothe r NESHAP . (b) . I f 2 

# -2/1P.3 1

emission s criteri aare me t

an d i t ha s emissio n sources , the n yes . 16 . A t aPetroleumRefinery , woul dth e following loadin g andunloadin g operatio n b e include d i n th e survey : Aj_j___ :

solvent loading ? (No t

subject t o HO N o r MACT ) Ye s propane/LP G int o truck s andrailcars ? N o diese l N o asphal t truc k loading ? Mayb e (? ) produc t stream s that

are pipeline dout ? Mayb e (? ) returne d material s (suc h a s off-spec) ? Yes(? ) truc k unloadin g fo

r crude oil ? Ye s 17 . Yo u hav e receive d som e excellent

questions . Wil l you , or

can yo u hav e another , longer meeting ? Answer : Th e EP

A i s havin g ateleconferenc e thi s Frida y (Jun e 5,1998 ) wit

h th e National Associatio n o f

Chemica l Distributors . Th e issu e o f anothe r meetin g i s open . 18 . Confir

mtha t a"forma l equipment

LDA Rprogram " mus t

b e on e tha

t i s require db y a Federal/State/loca

l rule . Answer : Thi s i s correc t 19 . Confir

mtha t "average " value s requeste di n Tabl e 1 ar e al l annua l averag e values . Answer : Yes , us e annual averages , bu t thi s reall y depend s upo n th e situatio n at hand . 20 . Doe s EP

A hav e authorit

y under Sectio n 11 4 t o require u s t o prepare marke dup plo t plans ? I thought

w e had t o tur

n over informatio n bu t

didn' t hav e t o generat

e ne w information . Answer : The EP

A believe s that

thi s information i s important t o th e NESHAP , and i t

als o believe s that

i t ha s th e authorit

y t o reques t

thi s information . 21 . Fo r

adiese l loadin g rack , th e vapor s ar e typicall y route dt o th e Vapo r Recover y Uni t for gasolin e truc k

loadin g even thoug h it s no t require db y state o r

federa l rules . I f th e VR U i s shutdown , gasolin e loadin g i s stopped , bu t diese l loadin g continues . I s thi s VR U considere d acontro l devic e fo r diese l loading ? Answer : Diese l i s no t

asurveye dliquid . 22 . Pleas e confir

mour understandin g tha

t th e surve y i s t o includ e only "distributio n tanks...tha t stor e organi c liquid s enterin g or leavin g th e plant

sit e (pg . 5 : I.E.) " no t 

# 3 °P.3 2

interna l transfers , suc h a s temporar y storag e tank s at

th e exi t o f on e chemical manufacturin g proces s uni t andth e entranc e t o anothe r chemica l manufacturin g proces s uni t Answer : Proces s tank s andinternal transfer s are no t covere db y thi s survey . 23 . What

definitio n o f

"non-gasolin e orgam c liquid " or "organi c liquid " i s bein g used ? I s ther e aregulator

y citatio n fo

r thes e definitions ? Answer : A definitio n ma

y b e availabl e i n other

NESHAPs . 24 . Organi c liquid s wit h HA P o f 1,00 0 ppm w are t o b e surveyed . I s th e 1,00 0 ppmw an anrm M averag e concentration ? Answ__ : Fo r

stream s tha

t are produce dsequentially a s differen t product s wit

h intentionall y differen

t characteristics , conside

r each strea mseparately . Fo r

stream s tha t var y unintentionall y over

time , us e annua

l average . 25 . Pleas e confir

mthat "annua l averag e tru e vapor

pressur e o f at leas t 0. 1 psia " i s th e sumo f th e partial pressure s o f

HA P only . Answer : We are lookin g fo r th e vapo r pressure ofth e liquid , no t

onl y ofth e partial pressure s ofth e HAP . 26 . Pleas e verif

y tha t i t i s no t necessar y t o generat

e new datat o answe

r th e IC Rquestions . Answer : You shoul d no t

hav e t o generate an

y ne w dat at o answe

r thes e IGRquestions . 27 . Wa s th e scop e o f

OL D intende dt o includ e asphalt emulsio n plant s o r

asphal t roofin g materia l productio n plants ? Thes e facilitie s are par t o f sourc e categorie s whic h are liste d bu t n o MAC T standar

d ha s bee n proposed . Answer : Thi s wil l b e revisite dan dposte do n th e EPA' s TT N website . 28 . Pag e 7 , itemH list s SIC code s tha t are exempt : wher

e ca n w e find definition s fo

r thes e codes ? They ar

e no t i n SIC book s w e possess . Answer : Thi s issu e ha s bee n clarifie di n th e additiona l instruction s whic h were distribute d at

th e meeting . 29 . Pleas e expan d o n th e definitio n o f custod y transfe r regardin g oil/ga s operation s a s it pertain s t o OLD . I s thi s intende dt o b e an y facilit y afte r th e materia

l i s transporte d fro

m th e providin g operation ? 

# 3 \P.3 3

Answer : T o answe

r thi s question , pleas e refe

r t o th e E& P MACT . 30 . Background : A refiner y receive s crud e oi l b y truck . Thi s crude oi l i s unloade dint o dedicate d tank s a

t th e refinery . Th e tan k

i s covere db y th e Refiner

y MACT . Question : Doe s th e surve y for mnee dt o b e complete dfo

r th e unloadin g rack ? Answe r Yes , but chec k th e EPA' s TTN websit

e fo r adefinitiv e answer .



# °S~P.3 4 Question s Receive d onNotecard s tha twer e No tAnswered atth e Organi c

Liquid s Distributio n Worksho p 1 . A t apetroleu mrefiner

y - storag e tank s ma

y chang e servic e frequently . Ho w shoul d w e respon d fo

r atank tha t ma y b e i n purel y in-proces s servic e fo r aportio n o f

th e yea r an d i n servic e for distribution-relate doperation s fo r another portio n ofth e year ? 2 . Doe s th e IC Rcover th e unloadin g o f

organi c liquid s fro

mdrum s into storag e (i s a 5 5 gallo n dru mcovere d a s acontainer) ? 3 . a . Distributio n terminal s d o no t trac k historical incomin g vessel type s - thes e are contrac t agreemen t wit h custome r referencing b y mod e type s whic h w e ca n lis t bu t may no t b e utilize d (tan

k truck , tank

car , barge , ship)-ca n w e lis t themall ? b . Wastewater

generate d a

t marine transfe

r collecte di n transfe

r transpor t vessel s i s t o b e reported ? Th e HA

P content i s no t measured . Ho w d o yo u wan t thi s reported ? 4 . 1,3 Butadien e i s handle d unde r pressure an dTabl e 2 doe s no t see mt o apply . D o yo u hav e t o complete Tabl e 2 fo r butadiene ? Th e onl y emission s ar e fugitiv e emissions . 5 . Background : A refiner y loadin g atan

k truc k fro matank . The tan

k i s covere db y th e refiner y MACT . Th e materia

l bein g loade di s no tgasolin e (i t i s a n organi c liqui d covere d b y th e Refiner

y MACT) . Question : Doe s th e survey hav e t o b e complete dfo r th e truc k loadin g rack ? 6 . I f mor e tha n on e plan t

o n site , i s i t

oka y t o fill ou t

separat e questionnair

e fo r eac h plant ? 7 . O n plo t

plan , i s i t ok t o identif y area s andthe n attac h alis t o f equipmen t in eac h are a instead o f tryin g t o pu t

al l th e requeste dinfomiatio n o n th e plo t plans ? 8 . Methanol , aHAP , i s unloade dfro mabarg e into astorag e tan k andthe n goe s t o anon HO N uni t a s araw material , i s thi s covered ? 9 . Methylen e chloride , aHAP , i s unloaded , stored , anduse da s asolvent i n anon-HO N proces s uni t

Wha t part , i f any , ofth e unloadin g i s covere dby thi s ol dsurvey . 10 . For m y refinery , I wil l b e spendin g mor e time providin g informatio n showin g what other MAC T standard s apply (Refinery , HON , Ga s Distribution , Marine Loading , MACTs) . Wh y can' t I provide only th e informatio n concernin g th e equipmen t affectedb y thi s MAC T ICR . (Loadin g operations , tankage , etc . fo r th e diesel , jet , fue

l oil , naphtha , etc . tha t i s no l covere d b y th e existin g MACTs) .



# 3 3P.3 5

* rt 9 11 . Wha

t abou t loadin g spent

causti c (wit

h HAP s an dvapo r

pressure ) for

reprocessing ? I s i t i n survey ? 12 . I f material s are loade d o r

unloade ddirectl y to/fro mtan k an dn o loadin g rac k

i s involve d an d tan k i s subjec t t o MACT , i s i t

exemp t fro mth e survey becaus e i t

i s no t arack ? 13 . Asphal t

ma y hav e HAP s an dvapo r

pressure (a

t loadin g temperature ) t o meet criteria , bu t become s soli d at

roo mtemp . I s i t

include di n survey ? 14 . I f unloade d wit

h o r without rac k i n MAC T facilitie s why d o yo u nee di t t o b e i n survey ? (e.g. , crude , feedstacks ) 15 . Hexan e tank

i s use d fo r purpose . Hexan e i s acarrie r o r solvent fo r eac h process . Hexan e doesn' t become par

t ofth e product , i t

i s simply circulated . Doe s i t qualif y a s MACT ? 16 . Gasolin e additive s - organic , containin g HAP s - are brought i n andstore do n site i n th e supplier' s tank . Thes e additive s are use di n gasolin e blends . Are th e additiv e tank s covere d and nee d t o b e reported ? I s th e pipin g t o th e blender covered ? 17 . Typica

l carrie r i s xylen e o r

simila r boilin g rang e solvent . V.P . are typicall y 0.01-0. 2 fro m0-10 0 ° F additiv e emissio n fro m10,000 gallo n (? ) tank s are 5-5 0 lb/yr VOC . Al l terminal s I wil l hav e t o repor t o n wil l b e 99.9 % exemp t

o r MAC T covere dexcep t

fo r additive . Thi s whol e proces s i s bein g drive n b y 20 0 lbs/y r VO C a t 2 5 sites . A waste o f you r tim e an d mine . 18 . Pleas e explai n th e philosophy o f gatherin g informatio n tha

t i s no t part o f thi s standard developmen t

A s fa r a s wha t control s are i n plac e (suc h a s HON) , th e other standard s ca

n b e directl y referenced . 19 . Liqui d ha s tota l HA P abov e 1,00

0 pp mthe n repor

t - an y d e minimi s report ? Fo r example , liqui d ha s 90 0 pp mb y 20 0 pp mxylen e an d1 pp methylbenzen e do w e repor t ethy l benzene ? 20 . Wh

y d o yo u nee d t o kno w spli t betwee n employee s andcontractors ? Thi s i s extraneous , and coul d *ar

y ove r time . 21 . There i s enoug h confusion t o warran t an additiona

l 3 0 day s t o dea l wit h thi s ICR . Wil l yo u consider

aSeptembe

r 3 du e date ? 22 . I' mstil l confused about jus t wha t a"co-locate dol ddistributio n facility " is . Ca n yo u giv e some real worl d example s fo r refinerie s an dchemica

l plants ?

^P.3 6

23 . Th e material s seemto us e th e term s "plant " an d"facility " interchangeably . I s that you r intent ? 24 . I t wa s m y understandin g base do n acal l t o EP A tha t mino r source s (<1 0 o r

2 5 tons/yr ) d o no t hav e t o respon d to thi s survey . I s tha t right? It seem s tha t sinc e th e MAC T standard s affect major sources , tha

t dat afro mmino r source s ar e no t relevant . 25 . Wha

t i s th e definitio n o f

an organi c liquid ? Wha

t about astrea mthat i s 60 % water , 40 % methanol ? I s 51 % wate

r a n aqueou s material rather tha n organi c liquid ? 26 . Gasolin e distributio n termina l tha t als o distribute s diesel . Th e gasolin e distributio n MAC T cover s th e loadin g rac k andth e wastewate

r whic h i s als o impacte db y th e diesel . Th e ai r pollutio n contro l (VR

U o r VCU ) wa s pu t

i n plac e t o meet

th e ga s MACT . Woul d thi s hav e t o b e Uste

d i n thi s survey ? 27 . Exampl e o f

RCR A issu e o n Tabl e 6 : EP A i s expecte dt o soo n lis t crud e oi l tan k

btm s a s a RCR A hazardou s waste . Thi s mean s tha t onc e i t i s "generated " (i.e. , remove dfromtank) , i t i s subjecte d t o th e variou s RCR A handlin g andprocessin g regulations . Amon g thes e are AA , BB , an d C C (subpart s of part s 26 4 an d265 ) whic h regulate ai r emissions . I expec t yo u woul d find n o valu e i n our includin g thes e waste s o n Tabl e 6 response . Similarly , mos t

o r al l ofth e followin g hav e RCR A status : O/

w separato r

sludges , biosludges , contaminate d soil , sewer/sum p sludges , t/e wate

r drain s (Tabl e 5) . I' d sugges t excludin g RCRA-regulate d waste s fro mTabl e 5/

6 responses . 28 . A loadin g rac k

i s th e source , however , aparticula r ar mi s dedicate dt o anon-gasolin e produc t On e produc t

ma y b e OLD , do w e only includ e inf o fo r th e arm s an dno t

th e complet e source ? 29 . Tabl e 1 , I

H HA P Constituent s - wit

h MSDS' s use dto provide th e HAP speciation , i s i t ok t o provid e arang e o f

HA P concentrations ? 30 . Our

onl y sourc e o f

wastewate

r i s adrip collectio n drain locate dunder aloadin g rack . I t i s line d u p t o wastewate

r treatment . Th e flowrat

e andconcentratio n are TOTALLY variable , dependin g o n th e conditio n ofth e tank ca r andth e amoun

t o f rainfall . Ho w d o I repor t awastestrea

mconcentratio n andflowrate ? 31 . Wil l any additiona

l Q A document s b e pu t

o n th e internet ? 32 . Ar e intema l pipeline s o r tank car/truck s transfer s withi n asite covered ? (Plant t o plant o r uni t t o uni t withi n a n integrate dfacility(site)) .

3 $