alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 9, 2016

d1206

Order 

Clerk

December 9, 2016

153652

MICHAEL S. SHERMAN, D.O., P.C., d/b/a

PHYSICIAN EYE CARE ASSOCIATES OF

GARDEN CITY, and MICHAEL S.

SHERMAN, D.O.,

Plaintiffs/

Counterdefendants-Appellees,

v SC: 153652

COA: 320689

Wayne CC: 08-014212-CK

SHIRLEY T. SHERROD, M.D., P.C. and

SHIRLEY T. SHERROD, M.D.,

Defendants/

Counterplaintiffs/Third- Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

and

GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL,

Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of Power Play International v Reddy (Docket No. 154347) is pending on appeal 

before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the 

present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in 

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
No. 45140.

#### Protests 500459-G, etc., of Jimmie Marcus, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar to that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
Before the Third Division,

May 26, 1945

No. 50219.

#### Protests 54367-K, etc., of John H. Graham & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in *the*New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Marathon Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis Knuettel II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: June 12 , 2014


/s/ Francis Knuettel IIFrancis Knuettel II

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Before the First Division,

November 15, 1949

No. 53710.

protest 549902-G (Los Angeles).

#### Kawahara Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the durikono passed upon in Abstract 52550, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2007315EN.01000502.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-112/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 56 EC - Legislative provisions concerning the public limited company Volkswagen)

(2007/C 315/08)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Benyon and G. Braun, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and A. Dittrich, Agents, assisted by H. Wissel, Lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 43 EC and 56 EC — Conditions for the privatisation of Volkswagenwerk GmbH — Allocation of special rights to certain shareholders — Mandatory State representation on the supervisory board of the company, irrespective of the numbers of shares held

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Declares that, by maintaining in force Paragraph 4(1), as well as Paragraph 2(1) in conjunction with Paragraph 4(3), of the Law of 21 July 1960 on the privatisation of equity in the Volkswagenwerk limited company (Gesetz über die Überführung der Anteilsrechte an der Volkswagenwerk Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung in private Hand), in the version applicable to the present dispute, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56(1) EC; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Declares that, by maintaining in force Paragraph 4(1), as well as Paragraph 2(1) in conjunction with Paragraph 4(3), of the Law of 21 July 1960 on the privatisation of equity in the Volkswagenwerk limited company (Gesetz über die Überführung der Anteilsrechte an der Volkswagenwerk Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung in private Hand), in the version applicable to the present dispute, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56(1) EC;

| 2) | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3) | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

# Summary:

Notice is hereby given of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board (Board). 

# Date and Time:

The meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on April 12, 2007, from 10 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business. 

# For Further Information Contact:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# Addresses:

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102. 

# Supplementary Information:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available) and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Open Session 

### A. Approval of Minutes 

    - January 11, 2007 (Open and Closed).

### B. Business Reports 

    - FCSIC Financial Report.
    - Report on Insured Obligations.
    - Quarterly Report on Annual Performance Plan.       ( print page 18197)      

### C. New Business 

    - Presentation of 2006 Audit Results.

## Closed Session 

    - FCSIC Report on System Performance.
    - Executive Session of the FCSIC Board Audit Committee. with the External Auditor.

Dated: April 5, 2007. 

Roland E. Smith, 

Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board. 

 [FR Doc. E7-6845 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6710-01-P
Before the Second Division,

May 28, 1958

No. 62024.

#### The Ruby Company *v.*United States,

protest 310358-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
PUBLIC LAW 113–63—DEC. 20, 2013 127 STAT. 667 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3458: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

Dec. 12, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 13, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–63 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To treat payments by charitable organizations with respect to certain firefighters 

as exempt payments. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Firefighters Assistance 

Tax Clarification Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. PAYMENTS BY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS WITH RESPECT 

TO CERTAIN FIREFIGHTERS TREATED AS EXEMPT PAYMENTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code 

of 1986, payments made to— 

(1) any firefighter who was injured as a result of the 

ambush of firefighters responding to an emergency on December 

24, 2012, in Webster, New York, 

(2) the spouse of any firefighter who died as a result 

of such ambush, or 

(3) any dependent (as defined in section 152 of such Code) 

of any firefighter who died as a result of such ambush, 

by an organization described in paragraph (1) or (2) of section 

509(a) of such Code shall be treated as related to the purpose 

or function constituting the basis for such organization’s exemption 

under section 501 of such Code if such payments are made in 

good faith using a reasonable and objective formula which is consistently applied. 

(b) APPLICATION.—Subsection (a) shall apply only to payments 

made on or after December 24, 2012, and before the later of— 

(1) January 1, 2014, or 

(2) the date which is 30 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act. 

Approved December 20, 2013. 

Fallen 

Firefighters 

Assistance Tax 

Clarification Act 

of 2013. 

New York. 

Dec. 20, 2013 

[H.R. 3458] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
Case: 2:11-cv-01002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 1 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 2 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 3 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 4 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 5 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 6 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 7 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 8 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01002-EAS-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/28/13 Page: 9 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T18:25:46-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 1 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 2 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 3 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 4 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 5 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 6 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 7 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 8 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 9 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 10 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 11 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 12 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 13 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 14 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 15 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 16 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 17 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00381-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 18 of 18  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T14:50:29-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### Marguerite C. DURKEE *v.*ARKANSAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD

CA 83-233

667 S.W.2d 376

Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I

Opinion Delivered April 11, 1984

*Ernie Witt,*for appellant.

*Treeca J. Dyer,*for appellee.

Donald L. Corbin, Judge.

This is an appeal from a Pulaski County Circuit Court decision affirming an Arkan*152sas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board decision denying an application for an off-premises beer permit.

Appellant filed an application with the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board which was denied by the Board’s Director. On appeal, the Board was unable to reach a majority decision, voting two for reversal of the Director’s decision and two against, with one abstention. The Board then issued an order reinstating the Director’s decision, substituting different findings of fact for those of the Director. Appellant appealed the Board’s order to the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Second Division, which affirmed the Board’s action. We reverse and remand.

The circuit court’s decision is clearly erroneous. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 48-1302. la (Repl. 1977), specifically requires that “all action by the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board shall be by a majority vote of the full membership.” In this instance, a majority of the Board failed to either reverse or affirm the Director’s decision. There is no evidence in the record that a majority of the Board’s full membership took any action regarding appellant’s application. In the absence of a decision by a majority of the Board’s membership, there is nothing for the circuit court to review. Therefore, the Board’s decision which was reviewed by the circuit court was not a valid, appealable order.

We reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to reverse its decision and remand the matter to the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for consideration of the Director’s denial of appellant’s application and his findings of fact, pursuant to the provisions of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 48-1314 et. seq.

Reversed and remanded.

Cooper and Cracraft, JJ., agree.
# C_2008031EN.01000102.xml

| 5.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3821 — Rheinmetall/Diehl/AIM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 31/02)

On 19 August 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3821. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3821. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# C_2007155EN.01004502.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/45

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 May 2007 — Antas v Council

(Case F-92/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 155/84)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 21.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19214-19215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sales

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: List of restricted joint bidders.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the 
Minerals Management Service by the joint bidding provisions of 30 CFR 
256.41, each entity within one of the following groups shall be 
restricted from bidding with any entity in any other of the following 
groups at Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales to be held 
during the bidding period May 1, 2007 through October 31, 2007. The 
List of Restricted Joint Bidders published in the Federal Register 
December 5, 2006 covered the period November 1, 2006 through April 30, 
2007.

Group I

Exxon Mobil Corporation
ExxonMobil Exploration Company

Group II

Shell Oil Company
Shell Offshore Inc.
SWEPI LP
Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.
Shell Consolidated Energy Resources Inc.
Shell Land & Energy Company
Shell Onshore Ventures Inc.
Shell Offshore Properties and Capital II, Inc.
Shell Rocky Mountain Production LLC
Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc.

Group III

BP America Production Company
BP Exploration & Production Inc.
BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.

Group IV

TOTAL E&P USA, Inc.

Group V

Chevron Corporation
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Chevron Midcontinent, L.P.
Unocal Corporation
Union Oil Company of California
Pure Partners, L.P.

Group VI

ConocoPhillips Company
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc
ConocoPhillips Petroleum Company
Phillips Pt. Arguello Production Company
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP
Burlington Resources Offshore Inc.
The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company
Inexeco Oil Company

Group VII

Eni Petroleum Co. Inc.
Eni Petroleum U.S. LLC
Eni Oil U.S. LLC
Eni Marketing Inc.
Eni BB Petroleum Inc.
Eni U.S. Operating Co. Inc.
Eni BB Pipeline LLC

Group VIII

Petrobras America Inc.


[[Page 19215]]


    Dated: March 28, 2007.
R. M. ``Johnnie'' Burton,
Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. E7-7220 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
EXHIBIT 12



                TRANSAMERICA FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS)



                                              Six months ended
                                                  June 30,
                                             2001          2000
                                             ----          ----

Fixed charges:
Interest and debt expense                  $   261.5     $   299.5
One-third of rental expense                     12.8          14.1
                                           ---------     ---------
                                           $   274.3     $   313.6
                                           =========     =========

Earnings:
Net income before income taxes and
  cumulative effect of accounting
  change                                        50.3          44.0
Fixed charges                                  274.3         313.6
                                           ---------     ---------
                                           $   324.6     $   357.6
                                           =========     =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              1.18          1.14


         The ratios were computed by dividing net income before income taxes,
the cumulative effect of accounting change, and fixed charges, by fixed charges.
Fixed charges consist of interest and debt expense and one-third of rent
expense, which approximates the interest factor.


                                       12