alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


                                                        As of March 28, 2007

Moving Images, LLC
c/o David Brandt
113 Buckingham Road
Upper Montclair, New Jersey  07043

Gentlemen:

     Reference is made to your Consulting Agreement with Trans-Lux Corporation
("TLX") effective as of December 1, 2004 as heretofore amended (the
"Agreement").

     1.  Notwithstanding anything contained in the Agreement to the contrary,
you ("Consultant") acknowledge and agree that Consultant is voluntarily reducing
the consulting fee payments for each month in calendar 2007 to $25,000 per month
at an annual rate of $300,000.  Consultant hereby exercises its right to extend
the Agreement for three years through December 31, 2014 pursuant to Paragraph 2
of the amendment dated as of May 1, 2006.  In consideration of the foregoing
reduction and exercise of option to extend effective in 2007 instead of 2008,
the fees for such three year period ending December 31, 2014 shall be increased
$15,000 per year to the fixed rate of $195,000 per year payable in equal monthly
payments of $16,250.  Accordingly, after giving effect to the foregoing, the
annual fees paid by TLX to Consultant shall be as follows:  $300,000 per annum
for each calendar year 2007 through 2011 and $195,000 per annum for each
calendar year 2012 through 2014.

     2.  In further consideration of the voluntary action by Consultant in
paragraph 1 above, paragraph 3 of the amendment dated as of May 1, 2006 is
amended in its entirety to read as follows:

            Consultant shall be entitled to recoup all prior
       reductions and waivers of annual fees and CPI increases
       subsequent to December 1, 2004 in the event (i) the EBIDTA for
       any calendar year commencing with 2007 and continuing through
       2011 equals or exceeds $14 million, and (ii) the underfunding
       of the TLX Pension Plan has been eliminated at any time between
       January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011 (the "Elimination
       Period").  In the event such underfunding has been reduced to
       $1,500,000 or less during the Elimination Period, but not
       entirely, then such recoupment shall be 50% and the other 50%
       shall be recouped in the event the underfunding is completely
       eliminated during such Elimination Period.

<PAGE>

     3.  All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
and effect.

     Please acknowledge below your acceptance of this letter.


                                                Trans-Lux Corporation

                                                By: /s/ Angela D. Toppi
                                                    __________________________
                                                     Angela D. Toppi,
                                                     Executive Vice President

Accepted and Agreed:

MOVING IMAGES, LLC

By: /s/ David Brandt
   ________________________
     David Brandt, Manager


Approved:

/s/ Richard Brandt
__________________________
     Richard Brandt
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

GEORGE C. CLARK,

PLAINTIFF,

 CIVIL ACTION 2:11-CV-108

V.

JUDGE PETER C. ECONOMUS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER

OF SOCIAL SECURITY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE ABEL

DEFENDANT.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's December 6, 2011 Report and 

Recommendation (doc. 17). No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. 

The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, determines that there is substantial evidence of 

record supporting the administrative law judge's determination that plaintiff Clark is not disabled 

within the meaning of the Act. 

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), the 

Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is 

DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The decision of the 

Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter 

JUDGMENT for defendant.

This action is hereby DISMISSED.

Peter C. Economus

/s/ Peter C. Economus 

United States District Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00108-PCE-MRA Doc #: 18 Filed: 01/03/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cv-01123-EAS-NMK Doc #: 24 Filed: 04/24/13 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01123-EAS-NMK Doc #: 24 Filed: 04/24/13 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01123-EAS-NMK Doc #: 24 Filed: 04/24/13 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T14:28:26-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Your social security check has a brand new look

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Your social security check has a brand new look 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of the Treasury. Financial Management Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 43 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018188975.jpg; 018188975.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### Amanda Lewis and others, *Respondents, v.*Person D. Ogden and others, *Appellants.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs.
IIA 

Calendar No. 167 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 20 

Disapproving a rule promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental 

Protection Agency to delist coal and oil-direct utility units from the 

source category list under the Clean Air Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. 

KERRY, Mr. BIDEN, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARPER, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, 

Mr. CORZINE, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. REID, Mr. DODD, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. KENNEDY, 

Mr. KOHL, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, 

Ms. MIKULSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. REED, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SCHUMER, 

Mr. WYDEN, Mr. AKAKA, and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

JULY 18, 2005 

Committee discharged pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c) and placed on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving a rule promulgated by the Administrator of 

the Environmental Protection Agency to delist coal and 

oil-direct utility units from the source category list under 

the Clean Air Act. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

SJ 20 PCS

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Ad2 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency on 

3 March 15, 2005, relating to the removal of coal- and oil4 fired electric generating units as a category from the list 

5 of major sources of hazardous air pollutants to be con6 trolled under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 7401 et seq.) (70 Fed. Reg. 15994 (March 29, 2005)), 

8 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Calendar No. 167 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 20 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving a rule promulgated by the Adminissource category list under the Clean Air Act. delist coal and oil-direct utility units from the trator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 

JULY 18, 2005 

Committee discharged pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c) and 

placed on the calendar
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v DANIEL G. SPELLMAN, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

11 USCMA 505, 29 CMR 321

No. 14,007

Decided May 27, 1960

*Lieutenant Colonel R. G. Coyne,*USMC, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Captain Warren C. Kiracofe,*USN, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The sentence is set aside and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General for submission to the board of review for reconsideration. United States v Green, 11 USCMA 478, 29 CMR 294.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Judge Latimer dissents.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Free tax help, tax counseling for the elderly

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Free tax help, tax counseling for the elderly 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Publication ; no. 1113-A; Publication (United States. Internal Revenue Service) ; 1113-A. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  154 × 40 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  024528908.jpg; 024528908.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

RE: Docket Number 2022 -KI -0188

State Of Louisiana in the Interest of D. W. 

City Court of East St. Tammany

Case #: 212152

St. Tammany Parish

On Application for Rehearing filed on 10/ 03/ 2022 by State of Louisiana

Rehearing j P- n e, A

z: 

Mitchell R. Theriot

C14

Wayne Ray Chutz

i

Chris Hester

Date XT 12 2022

Rodd Naqui
# C_2008178EN.01000602.xml

| 15.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5208 — Bilfinger Berger/M+W Zander FM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 178/07)

On 27 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5208. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5208. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
(Reap. Dec. 8230)

#### Fujimoto Trading Company *v.*United States

Entry No. A 241.

(Decided May 28, 1953)

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (George B. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> 1) That as to merchandise herein involved, marked “A” on the invoice and initialed LEB by Customs Examiner Leslie E. Brewer the market value or price, at the time of exportation, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for all sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which-exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoiced unit prices, packed.

> *569■ 2) That at the time of exportation there was no higher foreign value for this merchandise and that the appraisement made under authority of the Presidential proclamation published in TD 46158 was not applicable to said merchandise, based upon the decisions in RDs 4444 and 4570.

> 3) That the' appeal herein be submitted on this stipulation, being limited to items marked “A” as aforesaid.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as tbat value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise represented on tbe invoice by tbe items marked *“A”*and initialed LFB by Customs Examiner Leslie E. Brewer, and tbat sucb values were the invoiced unit prices, packed.

Insofar as tbe appeal relates to all other merchandise it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000710182
<NAME> TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   15,906,200
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    475,428
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         790,081
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,838,044
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,009,753
<COMMON>                                     4,732,305
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,419,929
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               6,152,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          632,103
<PREFERRED>                                    464,427
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         6,355,266
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 225,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  374,061
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               4,806,662
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               19,009,753
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    4,694,520
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           383,125
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,093,049
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,476,174
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      1,218,346
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              17,817
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               1,236,163
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       451,322
<NET-INCOME>                                   784,841
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     65,594
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  719,247
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       366,912
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      369,762
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       1,395,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### NUMBER 13 - 22 - 00459 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
JUAN YENELL VAZQUEZ , Appellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.
On appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County , Texas.



## O R D E R
Bef ore Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curia m
Appellant, Juan Yenell Vazquez , has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his conviction in trial court cause number S- 19

- 3037CR

. The trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defe ndant does not have the right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); see id. R. 37.1, 44.3,2 44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases from non

- appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move through the system unhindered while eliminating, at an early sta ge, the time and expense associated with

non - appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist. , 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State , 182 S.W.3d 906, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Within thirty days of date of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Diamond De Leon , is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appella nt has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of t his notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 614

– 15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State , 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable cas e law, and any factual allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. See Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 614

– 15; c f. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting3 appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1, 10 .2. PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b). Delivered and filed on the 7th day of November, 2022

.
- fplr2243-1
- fplr2243-2
- fplr2243-3
- fplr2243-4
- fplr2243-5
- fplr2243-6
- fplr2243-7
- fplr2243-8
- fplr2243-9
- fplr2243-10
- fplr2243-11
- fplr2243-12
- fplr2243-13
- fplr2243-14
- fplr2243-15