alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION 

SHERON PHIPPS, 

 CASE NO. 2:14-CV-227 

Petitioner, CRIM. NO. 2:11-CR-00080 

 JUDGE PETER C. ECONOMUS

 v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER

On March 11, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant 

to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section § 2255 Proceedings recommending that the instant 

motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence be dismissed. Petitioner has filed an Objection to 

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court 

has conducted a de novo review. For the reasons that follow, Petitioner’s Objection is 

OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This 

action is hereby DISMISSED. 

Petitioner objects to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation of dismissal of his habeas 

corpus petition. Petition again raises all of the same arguments he previously presented. 

Specifically, Petitioner asserts that, because the drug quantity involved, which is determined at 

sentencing, increases the potential sentence, drug quantity constitutes an element of the offense 

that must be found by a jury, and the failure to submit the drug quantity involved to the jury 

makes his conviction constitutionally invalid. 

Case: 2:11-cr-00080-PCE-TPK Doc #: 57 Filed: 04/02/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
 Petitioner asserts that he could not earlier raise this claim on direct appeal, because his 

claim relies on Alleyne v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 2151 (2013), decided on June 17, 2013, and 

after the Court of Appeals had already dismissed his appeal. 

The Magistrate Judge dismissed Petitioner’s claim on the merits, in spite of his failure to 

raise the claim on direct appeal, so this Court need not address the issue of procedural default. 

That said, for the reasons already detailed in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation, Petitioner’s claim plainly fails. This Court need not again address the same 

issues already discussed by the Magistrate Judge, or repeat that reasoning here. 

Petitioner’s Objection, Doc. No. 56, is OVERRULED. The Report and 

Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case: 2:11-cr-00080-PCE-TPK Doc #: 57 Filed: 04/02/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007181EN.01002301.xml

| 3.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/23

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2007/C 181/06)

OJ C 138, 22.6.2007

OJ C 138, 22.6.2007

History of previous publications:

OJ C 126, 7.6.2007

OJ C 78, 11.4.2007

OJ C 332, 30.12.2006

OJ C 317, 23.12.2006

OJ C 303, 13.12.2006

OJ C 225, 19.9.2006

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MICHELLE MATHIS,

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-173

v. Judge George C. Smith

 Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

BARACK OBAMA, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the United States Magistrate Judge’s

April 25, 2012 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 3.) The Magistrate Judge recommended

dismissal of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) based upon Plaintiff’s failure to attach

a complaint to her in forma pauperis application and her failure to comply with this Court’s Order

requiring her to file a complaint within twenty-one days. (ECF Nos. 2 and 3.) 

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advises Plaintiff that

the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results

in a “waiver of the right to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation de

novo.” (Report and Recommendation 3, ECF No. 3.) The time period for filing objections to the

Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has neither objected to the Report and

Recommendation nor filed a complaint. 

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections have

been filed and that the time for filing such objections expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and

Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

Case: 2:12-cv-00173-GCS-EPD Doc #: 6 Filed: 06/19/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
1915(e)(2). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00173-GCS-EPD Doc #: 6 Filed: 06/19/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2008128EN.01000101.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/1

---

(2008/C 128/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 116, 9.5.2008

OJ C 116, 9.5.2008

Past publications

OJ C 107, 26.4.2008

OJ C 92, 12.4.2008

OJ C 79, 29.3.2008

OJ C 64, 8.3.2008

OJ C 51, 23.2.2008

OJ C 37, 9.2.2008

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Caring for the land

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Caring for the land 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Forest Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 88-739-P. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 43 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the Annual Report of First Titan Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Federowicz, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)   the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”); and  (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  FIRST TITAN CORP.  /s/ Robert Federowicz Robert Federowicz President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Director  Date:   October 22, 2012
# C_2008267EN.01S00301.xml

| 22.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
No. 51143.

Abstract 50981.

#### Protest 985847-G of Chong Sing & Co.

Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from SEC Form 10-Q for 
the periods ended June 29, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-29-1996             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-30-1997             JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                    96,999                 143,715
<SECURITIES>                              31,868                  31,689
<RECEIVABLES>                            422,419                 464,576
<ALLOWANCES>                             (30,497)                (34,528)
<INVENTORY>                              398,472                 397,914
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         986,909               1,074,278
<PP&E>                                 1,026,672               1,057,103
<DEPRECIATION>                           475,316                 493,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,197,920               2,279,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    486,736                 515,482
<BONDS>                                  679,508                 702,361
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    0                       0
<COMMON>                                       0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               912,567                 943,287
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,197,920               2,279,314
<SALES>                                  549,287               1,130,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         549,287               1,130,440
<CGS>                                    387,355                 791,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            106,664                 215,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (4,250)                 (8,122)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        12,804                  26,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           46,714                 105,832
<INCOME-TAX>                              15,018                  33,937
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       31,696                  71,895
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                       0
<CHANGES>                                      0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              31,696                  71,895
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.57                    1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.57                    1.28
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

I, L.F. Guindi, certify that:

(a) A review of the servicers activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing
agreement has been made under my supervision.

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.



By:

/s/ L.F. GuindiL.F. GuindiVice President and Treasurer ofTD Auto Finance LLC,as servicer of Chrysler Financial Auto Securitization Trust 2010-A


Dated: March 23, 2012
The Princeton Review, Inc. Summary of Cash and Equity Compensation



 Exhibit 10.5 
 The Princeton Review, Inc. 
 Summary of Cash and Equity Compensation Practices 
 for Non-Employee Directors 
 Cash Compensation 

  

				
	 Annual retainer for Board membership
	  	$	15,000
	 Additional annual retainer for Board chair
	  	$	10,000
		
	 Audit Committee
	  		
	 Additional annual retainer for committee membership
	  	$	2,500
	 Additional annual retainer for committee chair
	  	$	10,000
		
	 Compensation Committee
	  		
	 Additional annual retainer for committee chair
	  	$	4,000

 All of the foregoing amounts are paid in quarterly installments. 
 Equity Compensation 
 Subject to the provision under
“Exceptions” below, all non-employee Board members are eligible to receive an annual grant of 5,000 shares of restricted stock granted on June 30 of each year and vesting on the next following January 30. 
 Expenses 
 In addition to the cash and equity compensation described
above, all members of the Board will be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board of Directors. 
 Exceptions 
 The compensation under “Cash Compensation” and “Equity Compensation” above shall not pertain
to any member of the Board, or any committee of the Board, that serves as a member of the Board pursuant to any agreement or contract between the Company and any third party or as the result of any right provided by the terms of any class of the
Company’s securities. 
 Approved by the Board on May 7, 2007, as amended by the Board on November 6, 2007.
April 4, 1972

No. 72-9

#### Richard D. Stewart, AB, U. S. Air Force v United States.

On consideration of the “Petition for Extraordinary Relief and Motion to File Attachments”1 filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that the issue of the legality of the action transferring petitioner from 3320th Retraining Group, Lowry Air Force Base, Colorado, to the United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, for confinement therein, was considered by the United States Air Force Court of Military Review, which tribunal affirmed the findings and sentence on March 10, 1972, it is, by the Court, this 4th day of April 1972,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is hereby, denied without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to assign said issue in a petition for review filed pursuant to Article 67 (b) (3) and (c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 867(b) (3) and (c).

1

 Since the attachments referred to are submitted in support of, and contemporaneously with, the Petition, a motion for leave to file same is unnecessary.
- 2012-06-19 - Transmit FONSI to IDOT - Kellogg-Seminary
- 2012-06-11 Kellogg-Seminary FONSI pages 1-5 only
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

COMPANY WRENCH LTD.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:12-CV-109

Judge Smith

Magistrate Judge King

RHINO CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER

The parties’ joint request to reschedule the Settlement Week

mediation, Doc. No. 16, is GRANTED IN PART.

The June 15, 2012 mediation is VACATED. The Clerk shall notify the

assigned mediator.

This case will be referred to the September 2012 Settlement Week.

 s/Norah McCann King Norah McCann King

 United States Magistrate Judge

June 12, 2012

(Date)

Case: 2:12-cv-00109-GCS-NMK Doc #: 17 Filed: 06/12/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9249 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9249

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to require the publication of 
scientific data, incident data, or other pertinent data relied on by an 
                       agency to justify a rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2024

  Mr. Edwards (for himself and Mr. Pfluger) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to require the publication of 
scientific data, incident data, or other pertinent data relied on by an 
                       agency to justify a rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Show Me the Science Act''.

SEC. 2. RULEMAKING REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 553 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(f)(1) The publication of a rule under subsection (d) shall 
include the scientific data, incident data, or other pertinent data 
relied on by the agency to justify the rule, except in the case that 
the head of the agency--
                    ``(A) determines, on a nondelegable basis, that 
                publication of such data would impede public safety or 
                security;
                    ``(B) submits to the Administrator of the Office of 
                Information and Regulatory Affairs (referred to in this 
                subsection as the `Administrator') a notification 
                disclosing the reasons for the determination under 
                subparagraph (A); and
                    ``(C) publishes such notification, consistent with 
                public safety, security, and privacy interests, in the 
                Federal Register.
    ``(2) The Administrator shall issue guidance for agencies on 
compliance with this section and shall monitor such compliance.
    ``(3) In this subsection, the term `scientific data' means recorded 
factual material that is commonly accepted in the scientific community 
and is of sufficient quality to validate and replicate research 
findings.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Aaron Schiffres *v.*United States

No. 7383.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 15, 1946.

Appraisement entry No. 1780.

(Decided September 22, 1947)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

*John D. Rode, amicus curiae.*

Mollison, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement of two ' coats which arrived in the United States from Czechoslovakia via parcel post. It appears that the brother-in-law of the plaintiff, resident in Czechoslovakia, sent the coats to the plaintiff and his wife, apparently without solicitation. They consisted of a lady’s Persian lamb coat and a man’s opossum fur-lined coat, both in used condition. They were originally appraised at $180 for the former and $60 for the latter, but when called to the stand, the examiner in the appraiser’s office who passed the merchandise and made the return of value thereon admitted that in his original examination he had not had an opportunity to open the coats in such a way as to examine the inner pelts.

*253Such an opportunity was afforded at the time the case came on for trial, and the examiner stated that he found the pelts to be very dry and that the value of the coats would be materially reduced because of the condition of the skins. Based upon his experience in the examination of similar articles at about the time of importation, he stated he would place a value on the Persian lamb coat of $60, and on the fur-lined coat of $20. These values were acceptable to the plaintiff.

I therefore find these values to be the proper values of the coats involved, and judgment will issue accordingly.
**Exhibit 15.4**

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (No. 333-175709) of Sky-mobi Limited of our report dated June 30, 2016, relating to the consolidated financialstatements of Shanghai Mihoyo Network Technology Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries (which report expresses an unmodified opinion asof and for the eight-month period ended August 31, 2015), appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 20-F of Sky-mobiLimited for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP

Shanghai, China

June 30, 2016
# L_2013217EN.01S00302.xml

| 13.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 217/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 217/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. John House, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of USMD Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2015; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2016 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John House                                              
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | John House, M.D.                                            
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President