alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Philadelphia 1997 8

- Hour Ozone SIP Revision s - Major Sources of NOx and/or VOC Not

S ubject to Source

- Specific RACT Determinations

Major Source Plant ID Number Major

Source Pollutant SIP

Revision Applicable RACT

Requirements

CTG Presump

- tive Source

Specific Aker Philadelphia Shipyard, Inc.

- Philadelphia Naval Business Center 01569 VOC 2015 x x

Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. 03363 VOC 2016 x x

Cardone Industries Inc.

- Rising Sun Avenue and Whitaker Avenue a 3887/ 2287 VOC 2016 x x

Exelon Generating Company

- Southwark Station 04905 NOx 2015 x

Inolex Chemical Company 02059 NOx 2015 x

MIPC, LLC 05004 VOC 2016 x x

Naval Foundry and Propeller Center 09702 NOx 201 6 x

Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P.

- Belmont Terminal 01507 VOC 2015 x x

University of Pennsylvania 08912 NOx 2016 x

Notes: * All the RACT documentation that was submitted within the 2016 RACT SIP revision was initially submitted with the 2015 RACT SIP revision. The initial documentation submitted for each source has been superseded by documentation submitted within the 2016 RACT SIP revision ; with exception of certain documentation for Veolia

Energy Efficiency, LLC

. For a list of documentation superseded by the 2016 SIP revision, refer to “EPA’s Clarification of Superseded Documentation in the 2015 SIP Revision” dated May 9, 20 16.

* * This list was compiled by EPA.
# C_2007235EN.01002302.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/23

---

Action brought on 10 August 2007 — Calzaturificio Frau v OHIM — Camper

(Case T-304/07)

(2007/C 235/43)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Calzaturificio Frau SpA (San Giovanni Ilarione VR, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other part to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Camper S.L.

Other part to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that the present application and the annexes thereto are admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the present application and the annexes thereto are admissible;

| — | annul the decision of the Board of Appeal (points 1, 2 and 3 of the operative part) in so far as it annuls the contested decision, rejects the application for registration in respect of all the goods in question and orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the opposing party in the opposition proceedings and the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Board of Appeal (points 1, 2 and 3 of the operative part) in so far as it annuls the contested decision, rejects the application for registration in respect of all the goods in question and orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the opposing party in the opposition proceedings and the appeal;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Calzaturificio Frau

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark consisting of a black arch sloping to the right (application for registration No 3.388.097) for goods in Classes 18 and 25.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Camper S.L.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish national three-dimensional trade mark in the form of a shoe for goods in Class 25, a number of English national figurative trade marks representing, in various forms, sloping arches for goods in Class 25 and two figurative Community trade marks also in the shape of an arch for goods in Class 18.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: partial rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: annulment of the contested decision and refusal of the application for registration.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark and of Article 73 of that regulation.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the annual report of On the Move Systems Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 for the year ended February 28, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert Wilson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: June 19, 2014BY: /s/ Robert WilsonRobert WilsonPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Director  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

p0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

137382

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137382 COA: 285340 Jackson CC: 02-001022-FC TODD MATTHEW SONDEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 3, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000710182
<NAME> TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   15,788,811
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    513,781
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         904,723
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,917,898
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,125,213
<COMMON>                                     4,732,305
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,367,737
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               6,100,042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,073,176
<PREFERRED>                                    464,427
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         6,313,352
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  327,439
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               4,846,777
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               19,125,213
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,365,459
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            77,692
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,015,900
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,093,592
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        271,867
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              16,181
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 288,048
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       145,037
<NET-INCOME>                                   143,011
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     12,460
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  130,551
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       136,416
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      114,689
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         333,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

May 19, 1949

No. 53157.

#### Fung Chong Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 23629-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
# C_2008071EN.01001201.xml

| 18.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/12

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS EPSO/AD/127-128/08

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

(2008/C 71/04)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competitions:

| — | EPSO/AD/127/08 — Nuclear inspection and nuclear engineering, and |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/127/08 — Nuclear inspection and nuclear engineering, and

| — | EPSO/AD/128/08 — Nuclear research specialising in nuclear installations, radiation protection and nuclear engineering |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/128/08 — Nuclear research specialising in nuclear installations, radiation protection and nuclear engineering

for the recruitment of administrators (AD5) with Bulgarian, Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Romanian, Slovak or Slovenian citizenship.

The competition notices are published in Official Journal C 71 A of 18 March 2008 in English, French and German only.

Full details are available on the EPSO website: http://europa.eu/epso

---
# C_2007296EN.01000502.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4680 — CASCO/BAG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 296/04)

On 26 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4680. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4680. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

 EASTERN DIVISION

Robert L. Hillman, :

 Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:11-cv-607

 v. : JUDGE MICHAEL H. WATSON

 Magistrate Judge Kemp

State of Ohio, et al., :

 Defendants. :

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 In an order filed on December 15, 2011, the Court noted that

the pending motion to dismiss had not been properly served. In

that order, defendant O’Brien was directed to serve a copy of his

motion to dismiss upon Plaintiff Robert L. Hillman by regular

mail, and to file an amended certificate of service indicating

the date of mailing. To date, no amended certificate of service

has been filed. Thus, the record shows that defendants filed a

motion to dismiss on September 26, 2011, and have never served a

copy of that motion on the plaintiff.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(a) makes service of a document like a motion

to dismiss mandatory. When service has not been made, the usual

remedy is to strike the filing. See, e.g,, Petersen v. Chicago,

Great Western Ry. Co., 3 F.R.D. 346 (D. Neb. 1943). In this

case, the Court gave defendants a prior opportunity to correct

the error by re-serving the motion and filing an amended

certificate of service. For whatever reason, they have

apparently chosen not to do so. Therefore, it is recommended

that the Court strike the motion to dismiss (#8) for lack of

service.

 PROCEDURE ON OBJECTIONS

Case: 2:11-cv-00607-MHW-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 01/17/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
-2-

 If any party objects to this Report and Recommendation, that

party may, within fourteen days of the date of this Report, file

and serve on all parties written objections to those specific

proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made,

together with supporting authority for the objection(s). A judge

of this Court shall make a de novo determination of those

portions of the report or specified proposed findings or

recommendations to which objection is made. Upon proper

objections, a judge of this Court may accept, reject, or modify,

in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made herein,

may receive further evidence or may recommit this matter to the

magistrate judge with instructions. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1).

 The parties are specifically advised that failure to object

to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the

right to have the district judge review the Report and

Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the

right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the

Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140

(1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981).

 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:11-cv-00607-MHW-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 01/17/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
ex10_1offerletter.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

               

    August
19, 2008

    Mr.
Michael Henighan

    


    Re:           Amended
Offer of Employment

    


    Dear
Michael,

    


    On behalf
of Alpha Innotech Corp (“the Company”) I am pleased to offer you a promotion to
the exempt position of Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer,
reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer, effective August 21,
2008.

    


    Your
compensation package will consist of the following salary, commission, equity,
and other components:

    


    1.           Your
base salary will be $160,000.00 per year, payable according to our standard
payroll schedule.

    


    2.           You
will be eligible to receive a $40,000.00 annual bonus that will be determined
based upon: a) the attainment of certain financial measures including revenue
and gross margin, and b) achievement of other milestones.

    


    3.           As
approved by our Board, you will also receive an additional incentive stock
option to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

    


    4.           You
will accrue vacation at the rate of 1.667 days per month (equivalent to 20 days
of vacation annually).

    


    5.           You
will receive the Company’s standard offering of employee benefits, including
health, life insurance, and 401(k) participation.

    


    If you
accept this offer, your employment with the Company will be
“at-will.”  This means that your employment with the Company will not
last for any specific period of time and either you or the Company can terminate
your employment without notice and for any reason (good or bad) or for no reason
at all.  Neither you nor the Company can change the “at-will” nature
of your employment, unless the Chief Executive Officer of the Company signs a
written contract which explicitly changes your status as an “at-will”
employee.  This letter cancels, supersedes, and takes precedence over
all other statements and representations regarding the terms of your employment
with the Company.  This letter reflects the final, total and complete
agreement between you and the Company regarding terms of your
employment.

    


    Congratulations,
Michael, on your promotion!

    


    


    Sincerely,

    


    /s/ Ron Bissinger

    


    Ron
Bissinger

    Chief
Executive Officer

    Alpha
Innotech Corp

    


    


    I,  Michael
Henighan, have read this letter and understand its terms.  By signing
below, I accept the terms of this letter.

    


    


    Date:  __________                                           Signature:  ____________________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9306 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9306

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to modify the Safe 
                   Streets and Roads for All program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 2024

 Mr. Evans (for himself and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to modify the Safe 
                   Streets and Roads for All program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Streets for All Program 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL PROGRAM MODIFICATION.

    Section 24112(c)(2) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 
(23 U.S.C. 402 note; Public Law 117-58) is amended by striking 
subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
                    ``(B) Planning grants.--Of the total amounts made 
                available to carry out the program for fiscal year 2024 
                and each fiscal year thereafter, not less than 20 
                percent shall be awarded to eligible projects described 
                in subsection (a)(3)(A).''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officerof Tipperary Corporation  Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Tipperary Corporation (the “*Company*”) for the period ended June 30,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “*Report*”),I, Joseph B. Feiten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   | /s/ Joseph B. Feiten    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Joseph B. Feiten        |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  | August 16, 2004         |
|        |        |                         |        |  |

 

----
Exhibit
      10.20

     

    Summary
      of Loan Agreement 

     

    Loans
      from Nansun Rural Credit

     

    
      PRC
        Yuhe
        entered into four loan agreements with Nansun Rural Credit on November 28
        2005,
        March 14, 2007, May 17, 2007 and December 10, 2007. Interest rates for the
        loan agreements range from 7.68% to 8.76% per annum. Nansun Rural Credit
        also
        provided four loans to Taihong from November 28, 2005 to December 5, 2007
        at
        interest rates ranging from 9.22% to 10.51% per annum. Loans form Nansun
        Rural
        Credit had a total outstanding principal balance of $8,731,337 as of June
        30,
        2008. PRC Yuhe and Taihong are obligated under these loan agreements to pay
        interest monthly and repay the loans on their maturity dates from November
        28,
        2008 to May 17, 2010. The loans are used for financing of working capital.
        All
        loans are secured by the land use right and building of PRC Yuhe and Taihong
        with a net book value of $12,337,750 as of June 30, 2008. There are no material
        covenants, conditions or restrictions in PRC Yuhe’s loan agreements with Nansun
        Rural Credit.