alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 43050.

#### Protests 836221-G, etc., of Wm. X. Huber Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the household utensils in question are not plated nor composed of gold, silver, or platinum. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained on the authority of Abstract 39482.
No. 47506.

#### Protests 838438-G, etc., of Allied Stores Corp. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Followin'g the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the •court dismissed the protests.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6237

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ANTHONY BELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge.

(1:91-cr-00189-CMC-2; 1:05-cv-03383-CMC)

Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 23, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Bell seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion to dismiss the indictment, which the

district court construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and

granting in part and denying in part his motion for

reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bell has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Transport Airplane Directorate

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W.

Renton, Washington 98057-3356

August 22, 2013

Mr. Doug Lane, Director, 

Deputy Lead Administrator 

Regulatory Administration

The Boeing Company 

PO Box 3707 

Seattle, Washington, 98124 

Dear Mr. Lane;

We received your petition which was posted on the FAA regulations.gov website on August 

15, 2013 and has your stamped date of August 14, 2013, for exemption from requirements 

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.841(a)(2) and (a)(3) at Amendment 

25-87 for the Boeing 737-7, 737-8, and 737-9 airplanes. The exemption, if granted, would 

provide relief from cabin decompression requirements following an uncontained engine 

failure so Boeing Model 737-7, 737-8, and 737-9 airplanes would be able to operate where 

they are most efficient, thereby reducing fuel burn and producing lower emissions. 

This request, which you submitted to the Department of Transportation’s Federal Docket 

Management System (FDMS), has been given Docket No. FAA-2013-0745. We are 

reviewing your request, and will contact you if we need additional information.

We need clarification on your statement on page 2 of your letter, RA-13-03728: “to support 

the 737-8 program schedule, The Boeing Company respectfully requests that the enclosed 

information be processed by January 22, 2013.” We interpret this to mean January 22, 

2014.

Boeing also requested a waiver from the publication of the summary in the Federal Register 

and the public comment period. The FAA received opposition to Boeing’s exemption 

application for §§ 25.841(a)(2) and 25.841(a)(3) at Amendment 25-87 for the Model 787-9 

in docket FAA-2012-0972, which is still under consideration. It also received opposition to 

similar amendment applications in dockets FAA-2005-20139, FAA-2010-0766, and FAA2008-0826. Therefore, the FAA feels publication of the summary in the Federal Register 

and a public comment period is necessary for this exemption application.

A summary of your petition will be published in the Federal Register for public comment, in 

accordance with the requirements of § 11.85. You will be advised of the agency’s decision 

on your petition as soon as possible. 
2

2

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Stephen Happenny, ANM-112, at 425-227-2147, or e-mail, 

Stephen.Happenny@faa.gov.

Sincerely, 

Michael Menkin

Transport Airplane Directorate

Aircraft Certification Service
#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6367.

Entry No. 117, etc.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, March 26, 1941, etc.

Certified April 9, 1941, etc.

Entered at Seattle, Wash., July 11, 1941, etc.

(Decided September 20, 1946)

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (Frank L. Lawrence*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof,'have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the -importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TODHUNTER
INTERNATIONAL, INC'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ITS THIRD QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,243,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,354,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 24,582,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,791,105
<PP&E>                                      75,574,836
<DEPRECIATION>                              32,345,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,659,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,468,597
<BONDS>                                     45,643,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,497
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,671,488
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,659,023
<SALES>                                     55,212,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            55,212,563
<CGS>                                       38,606,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,606,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,440,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,006,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,159,361
<INCOME-TAX>                                   728,749
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,430,612
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,430,612
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
        

</TABLE>
ex10_1-5.htm


    


     

    Exhibit
10.1.5

     

    


     

    May 29, 2008

     

    


    
      	
              Steven
      Helmers, Esq.

            	
              Christopher
      Reitz, Esq.

            
	
              Black
      Hills Corporation

            	
              Aquila,
      Inc.

            
	
              625
      Ninth Street

            	
              20
      West Ninth Street

            
	
              Rapid
      City, SD 57709

            	
              Kansas
      City, MO 64105

            
	 
      	
               

              Re:

            	
               

              Partnership
      Interests Purchase Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreement (collectively,
      the "Agreements") by and among Aquila, Inc. ("Aquila"), Black Hills
      Corporation ("Black Hills"), Great Plains Energy Incorporated ("Great
      Plains") and Gregory Acquisition Corp.
  ("Gregory")

            


    

     

    Dear
Steve and Chris:

     

    Under the
terms of the Agreements, as modified by those certain letters dated as of June
29, 2007, August 31, 2007, September 28, 2007, November 30, 2007, January 30,
2008, February 28, 2008, March 28, 2008, and April 28, 2008, Black Hills, Aquila
and Great Plains are to attach schedules setting forth Retained Agreements and
Shared Agreements prior to May 30, 2008.  We recognize that this
deadline may be implausible and therefore propose extending the date set forth
under section 2.2(1) and 8.5(d) of the Agreements to June 20, 2008.

    


    If you
are in agreement, please sign below on the attached signature page where
indicated and return a copy of this letter to me by fax or e-mail.

    


    


    
      	 
      	
              Very
      truly yours,

              Great
      Plains Energy Incorporated

            
	 
      	
               

              By:
      /s/ Mark G. English

              Name:
      Mark G. English

              Title:
      General Counsel

            


    

    
 

    
      
        

      



    


    ACKNOWLEDGED,
CONSENTED TO, AND ACCEPTED BY:

    


    BLACK
HILLS CORPORATION

    


    


    By:  /s/
Steven J. Helmers

    


    Name:  Steven
J. Helmers

    Title:    Sr.
Vice President and General Counsel

    


    


    AQUILA,
INC.

    


    


    By:  /s/
Chris Reitz

    


    Name:  Chris
Reitz

    Title:    General
Counsel

    


    


    GREGORY
ACQUISITION CORP.

    


    


    By:  /s/
Mark G. English

    


    Name:  Mark
G. English

    Title:    Secretary
and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                           1,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,195
<INVENTORY>                                     68,245
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,111
<PP&E>                                         150,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 479,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,002
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,620)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   479,963
<SALES>                                        204,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,068
<CGS>                                          143,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,545
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,852
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (541)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,132
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5777] 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me as Deputy Secretary of State, including by Section 517(a) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act (2006) (Pub. L. 109-102), as Carried Forward Under the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-5), Executive Order 13118 of March 31, 1999, and State Department Delegation of Authority No. 245 of April 23, 2001, I hereby determine that it is in the national security interest of the United States to make available funds appropriated under the heading “Assistance for the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union” in Title II of the FOAA, as carried forward under the CR, without regard to the restriction in that section. 

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress promptly and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: April 4, 2007. 

John D. Negroponte, 

Deputy Secretary of State,  Department of State.

[FR Doc. E7-7273 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-23-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation ("we", "us", "our") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) 	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of our operations.

 

Date: November 5, 2009

 

/s/ Stephen G. Welch

Stephen G. Welch, 

President and Chief Executive Officer
Before the Second Division,

January 6, 1939

No. 40327.

#### Protests 648280-G, etc., of Artmart Linen Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of scarfs and doilies made of burnt-out laces in chief value of cotton. On the authority of *United States*v. *Field*(22 C. C. P. A. 502, T. D. 47495) the merchandise was held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 923 and 10 cents per pound under paragraph 924.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2016-C29, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C29

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian(“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled allof its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,138,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,403,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,864,222
<PP&E>                                       4,620,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,199,150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          345,930
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,199,150
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,313,565
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,506,846
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,806,719
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,516,577
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,290,142
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,290,142
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 4, 2019

No. 04-19-00569-CV

IN RE April Marie SINGER, 

Individually and as Trustee of the Singer Financial Management Trust

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On August 23, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for interim 

relief seeking a stay of the complained-of trial court order. After considering the petition and the 

record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition 

for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The motion for interim relief is 

DENIED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on September 4, 2019.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of September, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI03145, styled Robert C. Singer, III v. April Marie Singer, Individually 

and as Trustee of the Singer Financial Management Trust, pending in the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, 

Texas, the Honorable Larry Noll presiding.
Exhibit 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF BOX SHIPS INC.



|                            |  |                                     
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary          |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation       
|Ardal International Co.     |  | The Republic of the Marshall Islands
|Alaqua Marine Limited       |  | Republic of Liberia                 
|Tacita Oceanway Carrier Co. |  | Republic of Liberia                 
|Aral Sea Shipping S.A.      |  | Republic of Liberia                 
|Amorita Development Inc.    |  | Republic of Liberia                 
|Efploias Shipping Co.       |  | Republic of Liberia                 
|Polyaristi Navigation Co.   |  | Republic of Liberia                 
|Lawry Shipping Ltd.         |  | The Republic of the Marshall Islands