alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 242/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.242.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 242 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 529 October 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.242.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 242

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 529 October 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 242/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2009/C 242/02 | Report from the Commission on food irradiation for the year 2007 | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 242/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2009/C 242/02

Report from the Commission on food irradiation for the year 2007

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 242/03 | Call for proposals under the 2010 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities | 19 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 242/04 | Notice published pursuant to Article 27(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in Case COMP/C-3/39.530 — Microsoft (Tying) (1) | 20 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 242/05 | Main specifications of the technical file for Somerset Cider Brandy | 22 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2009/C 242/03

Call for proposals under the 2010 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

19

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2009/C 242/04

Notice published pursuant to Article 27(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in Case COMP/C-3/39.530 — Microsoft (Tying) (1)

20

OTHER ACTS

Commission

2009/C 242/05

Main specifications of the technical file for Somerset Cider Brandy

22

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# United States savings bonds: the great American investment

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  United States savings bonds: the great American investment 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of the Treasury 
                    -           Description        
                    -  SBD 1950. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of the Treasury 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 29 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019571134.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PennantPark
Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (the Company) for the annual period ended September 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur H. Penn, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn              
|Name: Arthur H. Penn            
|Title:   Chief Executive Officer
|Date:   November 12, 2015
APPENDIX A-1 

PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS 

SEGMENT 3
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Emerging Acquisition Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 3, 2011



/s/ Joseph Rozelle

Joseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
(Reap. Dec. 8802)

#### Bradley Time Corporation D. C. Andrews & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 85356.

(Decided May 15, 1957)

Plaintiffs not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiffs when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2020411EN.01000101.xml

| 27.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 411/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 411/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2018-2019 SESSION

Sittings of 14 to 17 January 2019

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 337, 9.10.2020.

The text adopted of 16 January 2019 concerning the discharge for the financial year 2016 has been published in OJ L 160, 18.6.2019.

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sittings of 30 and 31 January 2019

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 356, 23.10.2020.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, CONTAINED IN
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION'S 1999 THIRD QUARTER REPORT ON FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     74,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               715,319
<PP&E>                                       4,296,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                 667,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,558,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          435,216
<BONDS>                                        975,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,175,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,558,924
<SALES>                                        512,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,129,188
<CGS>                                          512,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  810,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                184,333
<INCOME-TAX>                                    70,458
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            113,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   113,875
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 127 (Friday, July 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 38742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16595]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Seventh Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security 
Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224 meeting: Airport Security 
Access Control Systems (Update to DO-230B).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security Access Control 
Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held July 15, 2011, from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street, 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street, 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, telephone (202) 833-9339, fax 
(202) 833-9434, Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., and Appendix 2), 
notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems (Update to DO-230B):

Agenda

July 15, 2011

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
     Review/Approve Summary--Sixth Meeting.
     Discussion--Develop Plans for Next Document Versions.
     Any Other Business.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 23, 2011.
Kathy Hitt,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-16595 Filed 6-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.3


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Angela
D. Toppi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge
that:

    (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Angela D. Toppi
                                       -----------------------------------
Date:  August 16, 2004                 Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       Angela D. Toppi
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ADAM CHASTEEN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ROD JOHNSON, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 

Case No. 2:12-cv-229 

 Judge Marbley 

Magistrate Judge King 

 

ORDER 

On March 27, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended 

that plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the action be granted 

on the condition that, should plaintiff re-file the action, he be 

required to reimburse defendants for the expenses incurred by 

defendants in connection with the dismissal and re-filing of the 

action. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 112. Although the 

parties were advised of their right to object to the recommendation 

and of the consequences of their failure to do so, there has been no 

objection. 

 The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 112, is ADOPTED AND 

AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the action, Doc. 

No. 106, is GRANTED on the condition that, should plaintiff re-file 

the action, he be required to reimburse defendants for the expenses 

incurred by defendants in connection with the dismissal and re-filing 

of the action. 

 The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT in this action. 

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-00229-ALM-NMK Doc #: 114 Filed: 04/16/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v CORNELIUS H. WALKER, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant.

19 USCMA 472, 42 CMR 74

No. 22,601

May 28, 1970

*473
      *Colonel Daniel T. Ghent*and *Captain Karl J. Uebel*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel David T. Bryant, Major Edwin P. Wasinger, Captain William R. Steinmetz,*and *Captain John C. Lenahan*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Tried by general court-martial at Fort Dix, New Jersey, the appellant was convicted of stealing mail from a mail room during the period July 5 through August 2, 1968. He was also found guilty of opening this mail and taking money. Treating these offenses as mul-tiplicious for sentencing purposes, the court sentenced the appellant to confinement at hard labor for twelve months, forfeiture of $75.00 per month for the same period, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The question now is whether the law officer prejudi-cially erred by instructing the court on sentence that a record of Article 15 punishment for one day’s absence without leave and a reference that mail matter had on another occasion been found in Walker’s room were before the court “for all purposes.” Parenthetically we note that in acting on Walker’s petition for grant of review we rejected the defense contention that other acts of misconduct raised at trial also included forgery.

Because the charged offenses occurred before the effective date of the Manual for Courts-Martial,’ United States, 1969, the law officer’s instruction on the use of other acts of misconduct was erroneous. United States v Worley, 19 USCMA 444, 42 CMR 46 (1970); United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970). The instruction should not have been given. Corrective action is therefore required. United States v Mallard, 19 USCMA 457, 42 CMR 59 (1970). Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed as to sentence. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of 'the Army for resubmission to the- Court of Military Review for reassessment of the sentence.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Judge Ferguson concurs in the result.
Case No. 8,026.

#### In re LAMBERT.

[2 N. B. R. 426 (Quarto. 138); 1 Chi. Leg. News, 210.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Feb. 15, 1869.

Bankkuptct — Duty of Assignee as to Heavilt Moktgaged Peusonaltt.

It is not necessary for the assignee to take any proceedings whatever in regard to personal property of the bankrupt, so heavily mortgaged that it will not sell for enough to pay off such encumbrance, and the assignee has nothing to do but to designate the bankrupt exempt property, under section fourteen of the bankrupt act of 1867 [14 Stat. 522].

[Cited in Re Brinkman, Case No. 1,884; Fhelps v. Sellick, Id. 11.079; Re Hufnagel, Id. 6.887; ICimberling v. Hartly, 1 Fed. 575.]

[In the matter of Hugh G. Lambert, a bankrupt.]

1

 [Reprinted from 2 N. B. R. 426 (Quarto, 188), by permission. 1 Chi. Leg. News. 210, contains only a partial report.]

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

I think that in this case the assignee must proceed under section fourteen, and according to form No. 20, designate and set apart such property as is declared by section fourteen to be excepted from the operations of the provisions of that section. Such property does not pass to the assignee. It is excepted by section fourteen, and form No. 18, from the operation of the assignment. As to the residue of the mortgage property, unless it is for the benefit of the estate to discharge the mortgages and retain the property, or to sell the property subject to the mortgages, so as, by one or the other methods, to realize for the estate a net sum of money free from the mortgages, it is not necessary for the assignee to take any proceeding whatever in regal’d to the property or the mortgages. It would be idle to discharge the mortgages, and then realize from the mortgaged property a less sum than had been required to discharge the mortgages, and idle also to go through the form of selling the property subject to the mortgages, if the property be of less value than the amounts of the mortgages. The assignee’s whole duty will, in such event, have been discharged if he makes the designation referred to and then leaves the bankrupt and the mortgagees to contend over the mortgaged property designated and not designated, according to their respective rights. It seems clear from the assignee’s petition that there can be no surplus for the estate in the mortgaged property. The Brower mortgage is good against the bankrupt and the assignee, though not filed. The non-filing is a point that concerns only the subsequent mortgages. The aggregate of the principal due on the three mortgages is two thousand seven hundred and seventy-five dollars. The highest valuation of the mortgaged property, including the exempt property, to which the assignee gets no title, is two thousand two hundred dollars, and the assignee represents that it would not bring over one thousand five hundred dollars. Under these circumstances, the as-signee has nothing to do but to make his designation under section fourteen, and there rest.
No. 58169.

protests 136051-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### F. B. Vandegrift & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content Under T. D. 53159” in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this C&3G.