alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.2



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Managers of C-III Capital Partners LLC, the

Sole Member of C-III Asset Management LLC:

We have examined management of C-III Asset Management LLCs (the Company) assertion that the Company
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the
Platform), excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(i)  1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB Servicing Criteria dated February 20, 2018 as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Companys management is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the specified
requirements based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether managements assertion
about compliance with the specified requirements is fairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether managements assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. The
nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of managements assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys
compliance with the specified requirements.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable
servicing criteria included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB Servicing Criteria dated February 20, 2018 as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2017 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP
|                            
|Asheville, North Carolina   
|February 20, 2018
# C_2009013EN.01000501.xml

| 20.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 January 2009

(2009/C 13/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3182 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4509 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90470 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7870 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4812 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1200 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,708 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7035 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3435 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3050 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1768 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9628 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6492 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2273 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4223 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9693 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 800,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,2716 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0111 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3997 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 618,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7198 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,130 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,5998 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,038 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0813 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4192 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,0910 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3182

JPY

Japanese yen

119,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4509

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90470

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7870

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4812

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1200

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,708

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7035

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3435

RON

Romanian leu

4,3050

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1768

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9628

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6492

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2273

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4223

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9693

KRW

South Korean won

1 800,62

ZAR

South African rand

13,2716

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0111

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3997

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 618,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7198

PHP

Philippine peso

62,130

RUB

Russian rouble

43,5998

THB

Thai baht

46,038

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0813

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4192

INR

Indian rupee

64,0910

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Civil law, antitrust, United States v American Telephone and Telegraph Co

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Civil law, antitrust, United States v American Telephone and Telegraph Co 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Archives and Records Administration in cooperation with the Committee on the Bicentennial of the Constitution of the Judicial Conference of the United States 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyAT & T (Firm) 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  192 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  020845577.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CURTIS KINGWOOD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 261 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
Case: 2:11-cv-00125-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 08/05/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cv-00125-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 08/05/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Stop, this weed is a menace; Aviso! esta hierba es una amenaza

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Stop, this weed is a menace; Aviso! esta hierba es una amenaza 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019837603.jpg; 019837603.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 56596.

protest 158656-K (Rochester).

#### Horrocks-Ibbotson Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Urban Well Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Francisca Garcia, Plaintiff-Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Hereford Ins. Co., Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.), entered February 11, 2015, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.), entered February 11, 2015, affirmed, with $10 costs.</p><br>The defendant-insurer made a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the action for first-party no-fault benefits by establishing that it timely denied certain no-fault claims on the ground that the fees plaintiff charged for the acupuncture services it rendered to the assignor exceeded the amount permitted by the worker's compensation fee schedule (<a href="../2013/2013_51860.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Akita Med. Acupuncture, P.C. v Clarendon Ins. Co.</i>, 41 Misc 3d 134</a>[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51860[U][App Term, 1st Dept 2013]; <a href="../2009/2009_29467.htm" target="_blank"><i>Great Wall Acupuncture, P.C. v Geico Ins. Co.</i>, 26 Misc 3d 23</a> [App Term, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2009]), and that the remaining claims were paid by defendant pursuant to a settlement agreement.<p>In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue as to the efficacy of defendant's mailing of the denials (<i>see Kihl v Pfeffer</i>, 94 NY2d 118, 122 [1999]), or the calculation of the fee. Accordingly, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims - which sought the difference between the amount charged for the acupuncture services and payments made to plaintiff pursuant to the fee schedule or settlement agreement, was properly granted.</p><p>Plaintiff's remaining contentions are either without merit or, where plaintiff failed to articulate any specific arguments in its appellate brief, abandoned on appeal (<a href="../2015/2015_04193.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Mendoza v Akerman Senterfitt LLP</i>, 128 AD3d 480</a>, 483 [2015]).</p><br>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.<br>I concur I concurI concur<br>Decision Date: April 18, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
110 STAT. 3140 PUBLIC LAW 104–240—OCT. 8, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3056:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–751 (Comm. on Commerce).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Sept. 10, considered and passed House.

Sept. 25, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–240

104th Congress

An Act

To permit a county-operated health insuring organization to qualify as an organization exempt from certain requirements otherwise applicable to health insuring

organizations under the Medicaid program notwithstanding that the organization

enrolls Medicaid beneficiaries residing in another county.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING COUNTY-OPERATED HEALTH INSURING

ORGANIZATIONS TO ENROLL MEDICAID BENEFICIARIES

RESIDING IN ANOTHER COUNTY UNDER MEDICAID

WAIVER FOR CERTAIN COUNTY-OPERATED HEALTH

INSURING ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9517(c)(3)(B)(ii) of the Consolidated

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (42 U.S.C. 1396b note),

as added by section 4734 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation

Act of 1990, is amended by inserting ‘‘or counties’’ after ‘‘county’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a)

shall apply to quarters beginning on or after October 1, 1996.

Approved October 8, 1996.

42 USC 1396b

note.

Oct. 8, 1996

[H.R. 3056]
Before the Third Division,

January 19, 1940

No. 43055.

#### Protest 749474-G of F. & R. Lazarus & Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

The record establishing the nonimportation of the merchandise in question, the protest was sustained.
---

Exhibit 99.14

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year
ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 40-F) of Timmins Gold Corp. (Timmins), I,
Jim F. Cuttle, B.Sc., P.Geo., hereby consent to the use of my name in connection
with the references to the technical report entitled Preliminary Economic
Assessment Caballo Blanco Gold Heap Leach, Veracruz, Mexico readdressed to
Timmins on January 28, 2015, with an effective date as of May 7, 2012 (the
Technical Report) and to the incorporation by reference of references to, and
summaries of, the Technical Report in the Form 40-F.

/s/ Jim F. CuttleName: Jim F. Cuttle, B.Sc., P.Geo.

March 25, 2015

---
Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Navios South
American Logistics Inc. (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 18, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Claudio Pablo Lopez
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Claudio Pablo Lopez    
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  |  | 
|Date: September 18, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Ioannis Karyotis   
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Ioannis Karyotis       
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALFRED SPINNEY KELIIHULUHULU, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

and 

LORNA PIKAKE SPINNEY, 

Intervenor-Plaintiff, 

 v. 

NORMAN A. KEANAAINA; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-17342 

D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00417-LEK-WRP 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Alfred Spinney Keliihuluhulu appeals pro se from the district court’s 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 19-17342

judgment dismissing for failure to comply with a court order his action challenging 

the use and sale of a property easement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply 

with a court order. Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002). We 

affirm. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Keliihuluhulu’s 

action after Keliihuluhulu failed to comply with the district court’s order, despite 

being warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal. See id. at 642-43 

(discussing the five factors for determining whether to dismiss for failure to 

comply with a court order and noting that dismissal should not be disturbed absent 

“a definite and firm conviction” that the district court “committed a clear error of 

judgment” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). 

AFFIRMED.
APPENDIX D: AGENCY LETTERS 

Transbay Terminal / Caltrain Downtown Extension / Redevelopment Project EIS/EIR D-1 

APPENDIX D: AGENCY LETTERS
EXHIBIT
4.1


 


*Subject
to the terms, conditions and restrictions printed on the back of this
certificate and made a part hereof.*


 


ORGANIZED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA


 


	
  CERTIFICATE NO.

  	
  

  	
   

  	
  00,000

  	
  UNITS

  



 


HERON LAKE BIOENERGY,
LLC


 


Class A Units


 


	
  THIS CERTIFIES THAT

  	
   

  	
  is
  the owner of

  
	
   

  	
  (  00,000  )  Class A Units of Heron
  Lake BioEnergy, LLC, transferable on the 

  
	
  books
  of the Company in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of
  this Certificate properly endorsed.

  
	
   

  
	
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has
  caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and
  sealed with the seal of the Company, as of the 5th day of October, 2005.

  
				



 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Secretary

  	
   

  	
  NO SEAL

  	
   

  	
  President
No. 49827.

#### Petition 6354-R of E. G. James *&*Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial several witnesses for the petitioner testified, as well as the United States examiner who testified in behalf of the Government. It appeared that a trial lot of five casks of neatsfoot oil sent on consignment was imported to be sold on commission. From the evidence presented the court was satisfied that in entering the merchandise the petitioner as well as the broker was without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.