alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 71 (Friday, April 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6980]



[[Page 18723]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as amended by Public Law 104-13; 
Proposed Collection, Comment Request

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The proposed information collection described below will be 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, 
as amended). The Tennessee Valley Authority is soliciting public 
comments on this proposed collection as provided by 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1). 
Requests for information, including copies of the information 
collection proposed and supporting documentation, should be directed to 
the Agency Clearance Officer: Alice D. Witt, Tennessee Valley 
Authority, 1101 Market Street (EB 5B), Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-
2801; (423) 751-6832. (SC: 0008QG1) Comments should be sent to the 
Agency Clearance Officer no later than June 12, 2007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Type of Request: Regular submission; proposal for a new collection. 
(OMB Control number: 3316-0000).
    Title of Information Collection: Safety Harbors and Safety Landings 
Assessment, Tennessee River.
    Frequency of Use: Approximately every 10 years.
    Type of Affected Public: Business, Federal Government.
    Small Businesses or Organizations Affected: No.
    Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 80.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 40.
    Estimated Average Burden Hours Per Response: 0.5.
    Need for and Use of Information: The Tennessee Valley Authority, in 
conjunction with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, is assessing the 
status of the safety harbors and safety landings located along the 
Tennessee River and its tributaries. This type of assessment was 
performed approximately ten years ago. However, due to the changing 
river conditions and uses over the past several years, along with the 
growing demand for lake access, it is important to identify and 
preserve the most essential and useful safety harbors and safety 
landings that are currently designated. Only those safety harbors and 
safety landings that are considered nonessential and unusable by the 
towing industry would be discontinued. The information provided through 
this assessment will be used to support the justification of preserving 
stretches of shoreline for commercial navigation uses. Respondents are 
not required to answer all of the questions, but are requested to focus 
their review on the portion of the river that their tows transit.

Steve A. Anderson,
Manager, IS Business Services, Information Services.
[FR Doc. E7-6980 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
#### Abraham & Straus, Inc., by W. J. Byrnes & Co., N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6369.

Entry No. 715611, etc.

Invoices dated Hucknall, England, September 1945, etc.

Certified September 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 10, 1945, etc.

(Decided September 20, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

Paul *P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

An agreed set of facts, submitting these cases, establishes that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values less additions made by the importers on entry because of advances in similar cases.
IA 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 40 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing and binding of a supplement to, 

and revised edition of, Senate Procedure. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF SUPPLEMENT TO, AND REVISED EDITION OF, SENATE PROCEDURE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Each of the following documents 

shall be prepared under the supervision of Alan Frumin, Parliamentarian and Parliamentarian Emeritus of the Senate, 

and shall be printed and bound as a Senate document: 

(1) A supplement to ‘‘Riddick’s Senate Procedure’’, 

to be styled ‘‘Frumin’s Supplement to Riddick’s Senate 

Procedure’’. 

(2) A revised edition of ‘‘Riddick’s Senate Procedure’’, to be styled ‘‘Frumin’s Senate Procedure’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

SJ 40 RFH 

(b) COPIES.—One thousand five hundred copies of each 

document described in subsection (a) shall be printed for distribution to Senators and for the use of the Senate. 

Passed the Senate June 29, 2006. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES, Appellant v HENRY L. CHANEY, Jr., Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellee

9 USCMA 289, 26 CMR 69

No. 11,288

Decided May 29, 1958

*Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee, First Lieutenant Wade Ii. Sides, Jr.,*and *First Lieutenant Jay D. Fischer*were on the brief for Appellant, United States.

*Colonel J. M. Pitzer, Captain John F. Christensen*and *First Lieutenant Frank J. Lane, Jr.,*were on the brief for Appellee, Accused.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused, although pleading guilty to wrongful appropriation of a pistol, holster, and ammunition, was found guilty of larceny of the same articles in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. In his pretrial statement, which was admitted in evidence as a prosecution exhibit, the accused in pertinent part had stated:

> “I figured if I was sent back to Fort Lewis, I would be getting out of the Army in about three months and would be passing back by somewhere closed [sic] at which time I could mail the pistol back to the Detachment. I wouldn’t have any use for it after we left there.”

The law officer, after correctly instructing the court on the essential elements of the principal offense and the lesser included offense, charged the court-martial as follows:

> “The court is further advised a person may be guilty of larceny even *290though he intended to return the property ultimately if the execution of that intent depends on a future condition or contingency which is not likely to happen within a reasonably limited and definite period of time.”

The board of review, in a well-considered opinion, held the above instruction erroneous. In the course of its opinion, the board said:

> “. . . Evidence of an intent to return the property, depending on future conditions or contingencies cannot be held to be indicative of an intent permanently to deprive the owner of his property, but on the contrary is some evidence at least of a probable intent to return the property to its owner.”

The Judge Advocate General of the Army has certified two questions for our consideration. The first deals with the correctness of the aforementioned instruction while the second seeks to determine the prejudice of such instruction, assuming the first question is answered in the affirmative. The instruction in question is in language identical to that embodied in paragraph 200a.(6), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951. Under circumstances substantially similar to those presently under consideration, we held that an instruction based upon this Manual provision to be prejudicially erroneous and that it should not be made the basis for instructional guidance in the future. United States v Griffin, 9 USCMA 215, 25 CMR 477. Accordingly, the certified questions are answered in the affirmative and the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(concurring) :

I concur for the reason I expressed in United States v Griffin, 9 USCMA 215, 25 CMR 477.
Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 1 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 2 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 3 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 4 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 5 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 6 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 7 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 8 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 9 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 10 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 11 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 12 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00554-PCE-NMK Doc #: 48 Filed: 07/30/12 Page: 13 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T15:25:42-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 65653.

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc., a/c Montrose Bike Shop et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/2814, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period from March 4, 2011 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arthur H. Penn, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/S/    ARTHUR H. PENNName:Arthur H. PennTitle:Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate:11/17/2011
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Leading today's army: proud and ready

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Leading today's army: proud and ready 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Army 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of the Army 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018119430.jpg; 018119430.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2008294EN.01000901.xml

| 18.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 November 2008

(2008/C 294/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,266 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4474 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84825 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0126 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,515 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 210 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,792 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,395 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,5 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,773 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,797 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,4 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0674 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,943 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5502 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8116 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2725 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9281 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 810,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,7347 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6429 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1307 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 065,4 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5582 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,41 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,7162 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,291 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9148 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5466 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,266

JPY

Japanese yen

121,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4474

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84825

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0126

CHF

Swiss franc

1,515

ISK

Iceland króna

210

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,792

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,395

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,5

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,773

RON

Romanian leu

3,797

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,4

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0674

AUD

Australian dollar

1,943

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5502

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8116

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2725

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9281

KRW

South Korean won

1 810,38

ZAR

South African rand

12,7347

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6429

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1307

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 065,4

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5582

PHP

Philippine peso

62,41

RUB

Russian rouble

34,7162

THB

Thai baht

44,291

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9148

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5466

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North American Free-Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 
Binational Panel Reviews

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of decision of panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 16, 2007, the binational panel issued its decision 
in the review of the final determination made by the International 
Trade Administration, respecting Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico 
Final Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Determination not to 
Revoke, Secretariat File No. USA-MEX-2001-1904-05. The binational panel 
affirmed the Departments determination that Hylsa did not ship in 
commercial quantities and that its determination not to revoke the 
antidumping order is upheld. Copies of the panel decision are available 
from the U.S. Section of the NAFTA Secretariat.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caratina L. Alston, United States 
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade 
Agreement (``Agreement'') establishes a mechanism to replace domestic 
judicial review of the final determinations in antidumping and 
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with 
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel 
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national 
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine 
whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of 
the country that made the determination.
    Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on 
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of 
Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for 
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were 
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). 
The panel review in this matter has been conducted in accordance with 
these Rules.
    Panel Decision: The Panel affirmed the Department's determination 
that Hylsa did not ship in commercial quantities and that its 
determination not to revoke the antidumping order is upheld.

    Dated: January 16, 2007.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
 [FR Doc. E7-727 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
EXHIBIT 12

TRANSAMERICA FINANCE CORPORATIONCOMPUTATION OF RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(Dollar amounts in millions)

|                                   | Three months endedMarch 31, | 
|---------------------------------- | --------------------------- | 
|
|                                   |                             | 
|                                   |                             | 
|Fixed charges:                     |                             | 
|Interest and debt expense          |                             | 
|One-third of rental expense        |                             | 
|                                   |                             | 
|                                   |                             | 
|                                   |                             | 
|Earnings:                          |                             | 
|Income from continuing operations  |                             | 
|before income taxes                |                             | 
|Fixed charges                      |                             | 
|                                   |                             | 
|                                   |                             | 
|                                   |                             | 
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |                             | 

The
ratios were computed by dividing income from continuing operations before income taxes
and fixed charges, by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest and debt expense
and one-third of rent expense, which approximates the interest factor.
# CA2007279EN.01006801.xml

| 22.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 279/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 279/68

---

Corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AD/98/07 to constitute a reserve of Senior Audit Officers (AD9) of Bulgarian, Czech, Estonian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Romanian, Slovenian and Slovakian citizenship

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 171 A of 24 July 2007
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 171 A of 24 July 2007

(2007/C 279 A/05)

On page 12 Section IV. 3:

for:

‘6.   Recruitment

If you are placed on the reserve list, you will be eligible for appointment as a probationary official as and when required by the European institutions, in Brussels, Luxembourg or any other place of activity.’

read:

‘6.   Recruitment

If you are placed on the reserve list, you will be eligible for appointment as a senior audit officer; you will be recruited as a probationary official as and when required by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg.’

---