alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 19, 2017.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-17-00574-CV

PAMELA JOHNSON, Appellant 

V.

TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF 

INSURANCE, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION; W. RYAN 

BRANNAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE 

DEPARTMENT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION; AND TIFFANY 

DUARTE, ET AL.CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF DIV, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 200th District Court 

Travis County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-16-004703 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an attempted appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to 

request that the judicial review be done under the substantial evidence rule or 

undefined scope of review. 
2

On September 22, 2016, appellant filed suit for de novo review of the Texas 

Department of Insurance—Division of Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel. 

Appellees filed a plea to the jurisdiction alleging the trial court did not have 

jurisdiction over appellant’s suit. On February 2, 2017, appellant’s suit was 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On May 8, 2017, appellant filed a “Motion to 

Request that the Judicial Review be Done under Review under Substantial Evidence 

Rule or Undefined Scope of Review.” On June 8, 2017, appellant’s motion was 

denied. On June 29, 2017, appellant filed a notice of appeal seeking review of the 

June 8, 2017 order denying her motion. 

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. 

Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all 

pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until 

final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness 

Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 

842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The denial of appellant’s 

motion to request that judicial review be done under the substantial evidence rule is 

not a final, appealable order, nor is there a statutory exception that permits an appeal 

of the denial of appellant’s motion. Moreover, appellant’s notice of appeal filed June 

29, 2017, is untimely as to the final judgment of dismissal signed February 2, 2017. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (requiring notice of appeal to be filed within 90 days after 

the date the judgment is signed if a motion for reconsideration is filed). The last 

possible date to file a motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal from the 

February 2, 2017 order was May 18, 2017. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 

617–18 (1997). 

On August 11, 2017, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a 
3

response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before August 22, 

2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response. 

The appeal is ordered dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jewell.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brendan Flood, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/T of Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

| Date: April 13, 2017 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Brendan Flood             |
|----------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                 |   |   |   | Brendan Flood                 |
|                 |   |   |   | Executive Chairman            |
|                 |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
# L_2008276EN.01S00301.xml

| 17.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 276/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 276/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
GPNC 

March 30, 2016 

Ms. Susan Kurland 

Assistant Secretary of Aviation and International Trade 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

PNC Financial Services Group 

. 120 North Washington Square 

Lansing, MI 48933 

(517) 334-5454 Fax: (517) 334-1783 

email: timothy.~alisbury@pnc.com 

Timothy A. Salisbury 

Regional President 

Mid Michigan Region 

Re: Reestablishment of LAN - DCA Air Service: Docket FAA-2015-3491 

Dear Assistant Secretary Kurland: 

Thank you for your ongoing consideration of the application to continue the LAN - DCA 

route that was vacated by Sun Country Airlines in October 2015. 

We certainly understand that DOT I FAA deliberations on this matter are complicated. 

But the financial situation for the Capital Region Airport Authority, with the loss of airport 

revenue from the· Sun Country service to DCA, is creating a significant financial 

challenge. The loss of this service, along with other related factors, generated a 

budget deficit of $1.2 million for FY2016. Frankly, the Airport Authority is beginning the 

development process for the FY2017 budget and we have not identified a source of 

funds to replace this loss, except for the renewal of the DDCA service, preferably under 

the American Airlines application. The American Airlines application offers the greatest 

opportunity for full replacement of these lost revenues. 

Anything that can be done to expedite the reestablishment of the LAN- DCA service, 

so that the Airport Authority will have some reliable source of financial stability will 

greatly relieve our concerns for the upcoming fiscal year budget process. 

Your immediate consideration of this concem will be greatly appreciated. 

Warmest regards, 

Timothy A. Salisbury 

Regional President 

Mid Michigan Region
Exhibit 4.4





ADDENDUM No. 2


to


the Management Agreement dated 19/05/2011 and any addenda thereto


(the "Management Agreement")





Between


TACITA OCEANWAY CARRIER CO.


of Liberia


(as Owner)





And





ALLSEAS MARINE S.A.


of Liberia


(as Manager)





In respect of the management of the Vessel CMA CGM KINGFISH (the "Vessel")





Notwithstanding the relevant provisions of the Management Agreement, it is this, 18th day of September 2012, mutually agreed between the Owner and the Manager that a clause 8.05 shall be added to read as follows:





"Unless the agreement is terminated by the Owner in accordance with Clauses 12.03 (iii) and (iv) of this Agreement or by reason of default by gross negligence or misconduct of Manager, its Directors, officers and/or employees in the performance under this Agreement, upon termination of this Agreement in relation to the Vessel, the Management Fee will be continued at the above rate then in effect for 90 days from the date of termination. This is to cover operating and accounting cost of finalizing the Vessels' disbursements, demurrage, etc. In addition, the Owner shall continue to pay the following:





i)
Crew support costs for a further period of three calendar months


ii)
An equitable proportion of any management staff redundancy costs which may materialize.





Notwithstanding the above, in the event that the Management Agreement is terminated in accordance with Clause 12.05, then the provisions of the Compensation Agreement between the Manager and Box Ships Inc. dated 12/09/2012, copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, forming an integral part of this Agreement, or any renewal thereof shall be applied."





All other fees, terms, conditions and provisions of the Management Agreement remain unaltered and in full force and effect.





IN WITNESS WHEREOFthe parties have signed this Addendum this 18th day of September, 2012.








FOR THE OWNER
FOR THE MANAGER/s/ Maria Stefanou
/s/  George SkrimizeasMARIA STEFANOU
GEORGE SKRIMIZEASAttorney-in-fact
Attorney-in-fact
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Your line to the future: the Washington Interagency Telecommunications System (WITS), brings to you on June 29, 1992, new phone numbers, new ways to dial, new features

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Your line to the future: the Washington Interagency Telecommunications System (WITS), brings to you on June 29, 1992, new phone numbers, new ways to dial, new features 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. General Services Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. General Services Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  164 × 26 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  027242089.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of InterXion Holding N.V. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies to the undersigneds knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ David C. Ruberg

David C. Ruberg

Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 31, 2016
#### Bourjois, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7391.

Invoices dated Sutton, England, March 31, 1942, etc.

Certified April 1, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 14, 1942, etc.

Entry No. 750927, etc.

(Decided September 29, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 id) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
.*AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

James E. Lundeen, Sr. , M.D. , JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs. Case No. 2:11-cv-484

 Plainitff 

 

 Magistrate Judge King

Lance A. Talmadge, et al. , 

Defendant

 

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Opinion and 

Order filed on November 21, 2011, this action is dismissed. 

Date: November 21, 2011 James Bonini, Clerk

By: _s/Rashan Spraggins__________

 Rashan Spraggins , Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00484-NMK Doc #: 43 Filed: 11/21/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Office of Policy

Office of Rail Policy and Development

Federal Railroad Administration

March 2013

U.S. Rail-Carried Trade with Canada and Mexico

U.S. trade with Mexico via rail more than tripled from $20.4 billion in 1999 to $64.5

billion in 2012 recovering from 2009 recession level of $34.6 billion. U.S. trade with 

Canada by rail increased 78 percent from $58.0 billion in 1999 to $103.0 billion in 2012

up from 2009 recession level of $61.0 billion. Source is USDOT/Bureau of 

Transportation Statistics, Transborder Surface Freight Data; 

http://transborder.bts.gov/programs/international/transborder/TBDR_QA.html
In 2012, rail accounted for 23 percent of the trade with Canada by rail or truck ($103.0

billion out of $444.5 billion). With respect to trade with Mexico, rail accounted for 17

percent by rail or truck ($64.5 billion out of $387.7 billion).

On the Mexican border, Laredo, TX, continues to be the dominant port, accounting for 50

percent of all rail traffic, by value.
On the Canadian border, Port Huron, MI, continues to lead other ports, with over $26

billion in trade by rail, while Detroit is a close second with over $24 billion. They are 

followed by Buffalo/Niagara Falls which has declined from a peak in 1999 of over $15 

million to nearly $13 billion in 2012. 
Top Commodities—U.S. Trade with Canada

By value, transportation equipment is the largest commodity group for both U.S. exports 

and imports by rail to/from Canada.

 
Top Commodities—U.S. Trade with Mexico:

By value, transportation equipment dominates U.S. exports and imports by rail to/from 

Mexico.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 71 (Friday, April 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 4 Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel (Including the States of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, 
Ohio, Tennessee, and Wisconsin)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 4 Committee of the Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 15, 2007, at 10 a.m., 
Central Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(414) 231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 4 Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel 
will be held Tuesday, May 15, 2007, at 10 a.m., Central Time via a 
telephone conference call. You can submit written comments to the Panel 
by faxing the comments to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, P.O. Box 3205, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3205, 
or you can contact us at www.improveirs.org. This meeting is not 
required to be open to the public, but because we are always interested 
in community input we will accept public comments. Please contact Mary 
Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360 for dial-in information.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 6, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E7-6967 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2010-0955
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9093 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9093

  To prioritize healthcare facilities and mental or behavioral health 
 facilities in the Community Facilities program for fiscal years 2025 
 through 2031, and allow loans and grants under the program to be used 
 for medical supplies, increasing telehealth capabilities, supporting 
    staffing needs, or renovating and remodeling closed facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2024

Ms. Underwood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prioritize healthcare facilities and mental or behavioral health 
 facilities in the Community Facilities program for fiscal years 2025 
 through 2031, and allow loans and grants under the program to be used 
 for medical supplies, increasing telehealth capabilities, supporting 
    staffing needs, or renovating and remodeling closed facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prioritizing Rural Hospitals Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZATION UNDER THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES LOAN AND GRANT 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--In selecting recipients of direct loans or grants 
for the development of essential community facilities under section 
306(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 
1926(a)) for fiscal years 2025 through 2031, the Secretary of 
Agriculture shall give priority to entities eligible for those direct 
loans or grants to develop facilities to provide healthcare or mental 
or behavioral healthcare.
    (b) Use of Funds.--An eligible entity described in subsection (a) 
that receives a direct loan or grant described in subsection (a) may 
use the direct loan or grant funds for medical supplies, increasing 
telehealth capabilities, supporting staffing needs, or renovating and 
remodeling closed facilities.
    (c) Reservation of Funds.--Of the amounts made available for 
guaranteed loans under section 310B(g) of the Consolidated Farm and 
Rural Development Act for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2031, 10 
percent shall be reserved to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1**
**- 6232** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

P laintiff

– Appell ee ,

v.

JEFFREY DENNARD MCNEAIR ,
Defen d a nt

– Appell ant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Midd le District of North Carolina , at Salisbury

. James A. Beaty , Jr., Chief District Judge. ( 4 : 9 6

- c r
- 0 0070

- JAB

- 1 )

Submitted : April 28 , 2011 Decided: May 4 , 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by unpublished per curiam opi nion

.

Jeffrey Dennard McNeair, Appellant Pro Se

. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina; Paul Alexander Weinman , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Winston

- Salem, North Carolina , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Dennard McNeair appeals the district court ’ s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record an d find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. McNeair , No. 4:96

- cr
00070

- JAB

- 1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2011) . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequ ately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|   | 1. | The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period from September 3, 2010 (Inception) through March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| June 29, 2011 | /s/  Wei Li                                                                |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | Wei LiChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial Officer) |

----