[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19026-19039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7151]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Preparing Ex-Offenders for the Workplace Through Beneficiary-
Choice Contracting; Solicitation for Grant Applications

    Announcement Type: New. Notice of solicitation for grant 
applications.
    Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/DFA PY-06-14.
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 17,261.
    Key Dates: The closing date for receipt of applications under this 
announcement is May 25, 2007. Applications must be received no later 
than 4 p.m. (Eastern Time). Application and submission information is 
explained in detail in Section IV of this SGA.
    There will be an informational webinar held for this grant 
competition. Information on the date/time of this webinar and a 
recording for applicants who cannot attend will be available on 
www.dol.gov/cfbci.
    Summary: The Employment and Training Administration (ETA), U.S. 
Department of Labor (DOL), announces the availability of approximately 
$5 million in Responsible Reintegration of Youthful Offender grant 
funds to address the specific workforce challenges of ex-offenders and 
produce positive outcomes with a particular focus on employment and 
reduced recidivism. Projects funded under this competition will be 
consistent with both DOL's Youth Vision and President Bush's Faith-
Based and Community Initiative.
    Grant funds awarded under this competition will be used to 
implement a program of services for ex-offenders (ages 18 to 29) under 
a beneficiary-choice contracting model. The beneficiary choice 
contracting model, to be explained more fully later, involves providing 
program participants with an independent choice among multiple service 
providers for specific services. Participants will receive case 
management services from the grantee, but will choose among contracted 
specialized service providers for more in-depth services, including 
soft-skills training and long-term follow up on participant outcomes. 
The grantee will compensate the contracted specialized service 
providers on a per capita basis for services provided, as well as per 
capita performance-based incentives.
    The overarching objective of these programs will be to help ex-
offenders receive services and training, enter and retain employment, 
and avoid recidivism. Each application must provide evidence of 
partnerships with a network of faith-based and community organizations 
(FBCOs), the public workforce investment system and the criminal 
justice system. Strategic partnerships between business representatives 
from high-growth/high-demand industries and the education and training 
community are also encouraged. It is anticipated that individual awards 
will average $1,000,000 for the first year of operation to serve 225 
participants per site.
    Supplementary Information: This solicitation provides background 
information on Beneficiary Choice Contracting and critical elements 
required of projects funded under the solicitation. It also describes 
the application submission requirements, the process that eligible 
applicants must use to apply for funds covered by this solicitation, 
and how grantees will be selected. This announcement consists of eight 
parts:
    <bullet> Part I provides background information on Beneficiary 
Choice Contracting, DOL's Youth Vision, and The President's Faith-Based 
and Community Initiative.
    <bullet> Part II describes the size and nature of the anticipated 
awards.
    <bullet> Part III describes the qualifications of an eligible 
applicant.
    <bullet> Part IV provides information on the application and 
submission process.
    <bullet> Part V explains the review process and rating criteria 
that will be used to evaluate applications.
    <bullet> Part VI provides award administration information.
    <bullet> Part VII contains ETA contact information.
    <bullet> Part VIII contains other information for applicants.

Part I. Funding Opportunity Description

1. Background

    Experts estimate that each year more than 650,000 inmates are 
released from Federal and State prisons and return to their communities 
and families. The return of these ex-prisoners threatens the fragile 
cohesion in many of the most troubled neighborhoods in America. Without 
help, a majority of ex-prisoners return to criminal activity. For 
example, according to the U.S. Department of Justice, 68 percent of 
inmates will be charged with new crimes within three years of their 
release from prison, and 47 percent will be reconvicted.
    Released prisoners face a myriad of challenges that contribute to a 
return to criminal activity, re-arrest, and re-incarceration. 
Joblessness among ex-prisoners has been broadly linked to recidivism 
rates. Statistics reveal that even before incarceration, adult 
prisoners demonstrate weak or non-existent ties to the workforce. Data 
from 1997 show that nearly one-third of adult prisoners were unemployed 
in the month before their arrest, compared to seven percent 
unemployment in the general population. Post-incarceration employment 
rates only get worse--unemployment among ex-prisoners has been 
estimated at between 25 and 40 percent. Likewise, prisoners also 
demonstrate low levels of educational attainment. Nineteen percent of 
adult State prisoners are completely illiterate and 40 percent are 
functionally illiterate; over half of State parole entrants were not 
high school graduates and as many as eleven percent had an eighth grade 
education or less.
    Research has also broadly documented the substance abuse and mental 
health issues of ex-prisoners--factors that are likely to contribute to 
poor education levels, lack of employability, and a return to criminal 
activity. A study of parolees from State prisons in 1999 found that 84 
percent had been using an illegal drug or abusing alcohol at the time 
of their offense. One-quarter had been alcohol dependent and one-
quarter had been IV drug users. Fourteen percent had a mental illness 
and twelve percent were homeless at the time of their arrest. In some 
States, nearly one-quarter of parole revocations were related to drug-
related violations.
    In returning to criminal activity, ex-prisoners contribute to the 
presence of violence and crime in already struggling neighborhoods and 
reduce their own chances of living healthy and positive lives or 
contributing to their families. Research indicates that parental loss 
is related to a host of poor outcomes for children that include 
poverty, drug abuse, educational failure, criminal behavior, and 
premature death. Healthy and consistent relationships between parents 
and children strengthen the community by positively impacting both 
generations. Ex-offenders with strong family and community ties have 
greater success in reintegrating into the community and avoiding 
incarceration.
    In order to successfully reintegrate into the community, it is 
essential that

[[Page 19027]]

ex-offenders possess the skills and support necessary to enter and 
compete in the workforce. This solicitation is designed to draw on the 
unique strengths of faith-based and community organizations that may 
not readily partner with the government under more typical funding 
mechanisms. These organizations will serve as a primary partner for 
social service delivery to ex-prisoners, offering highly personalized 
support as well as a direct link into the communities to which the ex-
prisoners are returning. The program also seeks to coordinate the 
provision of these services with judicial system supervision of the 
released prisoners by working with parole and probation officers.
    Community-based partners are well suited for this work because they 
can provide the resources and infrastructure necessary to intervene in 
the lives of returnees and interrupt cycles of crime and incarceration. 
This grant will rely heavily on FBCOs to develop relationships and 
ensure connections to rehabilitation services for the formerly 
incarcerated. Research indicates that faith-based and community 
institutions are among the strongest, most trusted institutions in the 
urban neighborhoods to which the majority of released inmates will 
return. Local faith-based and community organizations possess many 
resources at their command--including buildings, volunteers, the 
respect of the community and a rich tradition of outreach and service. 
Churches, mosques, temples, service organizations, and community 
centers can be especially significant in impoverished urban areas, 
where FBCOs have historically had a strong presence.
    Many FBCOs also possess a proven ability to work collaboratively 
with other service providers and justice agencies for the delivery of 
social services. This is a vital asset since many FBCOs in poor urban 
neighborhoods are small and possess limited financial resources. To 
effectively ensure connections to job training and social services, 
they must build collaborations with other public and private 
organizations. A substantial number of inner-city faith-based and 
community leaders already operate re-entry programs. This initiative 
will help develop and expand these programs that provide job training, 
mentoring and other transitional services that help ex-offenders avoid 
recidivism and become contributing members of their communities.
Objectives
    This program is designed to operate via a beneficiary-choice 
contracting model. Under this model, the individual receiving 
government-funded services (beneficiary) is offered a genuine and 
independent choice among multiple providers. Each provider offers the 
same core services, as well as a unique combination of related 
services. Since service providers are allowed flexibility in the 
combination of and approach to services they offer, this model fosters 
a diversity of service styles in service delivery. This diversity, in 
turn, enables each recipient to choose the provider best suited to his 
or her unique needs and encourages a greater personal engagement as the 
recipient takes ownership in choosing among a variety of services and 
providers. The approach allows flexibility and freedom to both 
participants and providers, and enables organizations that might be 
disinclined to partner with the government in a more constrained 
environment to consider doing so.
    Grant objectives for this program include:
    <bullet> Positive outcomes for participants, including lower 
recidivism, successful employment and increased job retention;
    <bullet> Drawing upon the unique strengths of many faith-based and 
community groups that may not readily partner with the government under 
more typical funding mechanisms; and
    <bullet> Serving as a model for Federal, State and local agencies 
looking to implement beneficiary-choice contracting.
Service Model
    Grants will be awarded to faith-based and community organizations, 
Workforce Investment Boards, One-Stop Career Centers, corrections 
agencies, and other State or local agencies. The grantee will act as 
the central services coordinator (services coordinator). Participants 
can be recruited in many different ways, including by referrals to the 
services coordinator directly by the courts, parole agencies, criminal 
justice agencies, local One-Stop Career Centers, Youth Build programs 
or other service providers. A referral network of service providers 
must also be developed and maintained by each grantee.
Services Coordinator
    Participants will be enrolled by the services coordinator, which 
will provide case management and referral to program services. The 
services coordinator will conduct an initial assessment of the 
participant's needs and interests and then offer him or her a genuine 
and independent choice among a variety of approved specialized service 
providers for in-depth services. The participant will make this choice 
based on summaries of the specialized service providers that include a 
description of the services offered (both core and specialized) by each 
sub-contractor (listed below). This participant choice must be free, 
independent and informed. The service coordinator may discuss the 
participants needs discovered in the initial assessment, but once the 
choice process has begun, each participant must make the choice of 
specialized service providers based on the neutral information given to 
him or her by the service coordinator.
    The services coordinator will provide case management to all 
participants that enroll in the program. The services coordinator will 
also manage relationships and contracts with its network of specialized 
service providers. Expenditures by the services coordinator on its own 
activities and expenses cannot account for more than 40% of grant 
funds. This includes funds reserved for services and program 
administration, including technical assistance and oversight. At least 
60% must be spent on services for participants through specialized 
service providers serving program participants.
    All grantee sites must include access to a wide variety of services 
that ex-offenders need to successfully transition into employment. As 
services coordinators, grantee organizations will:
    <bullet> Identify and recruit participants;
    <bullet> Provide basic intake services, including assessment of 
needs and interests;
    <bullet> Offer each participant a genuine and independent choice 
among service providers--including at least one provider of non-
religious-based services;
    <bullet> Require informed consent forms of individuals choosing 
services that contain religious content;
    <bullet> Provide ongoing case management;
    <bullet> Aid recipients in making full use of all services 
available through local One-Stop Career Center systems, including, when 
possible, Individual Training Accounts;
    <bullet> Develop a referral process for services. Through this 
referral process the service coordinator will ensure that there is a 
provider of non-religious-based (secular) service for every religious-
based service offered;
    <bullet> Recruit employers that are willing to employ program 
participants; and
    <bullet> Develop a data collection strategy.

[[Page 19028]]

    As manager of its contracts with specialized service providers, 
grantee organizations will:
    <bullet> Design guidelines and baseline criteria for service 
provider organizations' participation. These objective criteria would 
require a level of quality in basic services offered. In addition, 
preference in selecting specialized service provider sub-contractors 
should be given to organizations that provide a diverse offering of 
supplementary services;
    <bullet> Recruit a minimum of five specialized service providers--
including FBCOs;
    <bullet> Ensure at least one specialized service provider that 
offers non-religious-based services;
    <bullet> Establish performance-based contracts with service 
provider organizations;
    <bullet> Oversee grant data collection procedures and compilation;
    <bullet> Aid service providers in compliance with necessary 
reporting and other compliance issues;
    <bullet> Deliver contract payment to service providers; and
    <bullet> Perform all other aspects of managing the Federal grant--
including fiscal controls and responsibility.
    After obtaining the consent of the participant, the services 
coordinator must share information including basic contact information, 
assessment information and any other pertinent information with the 
chosen service provider. Case management must also be provided in 
coordination with the specialized service provider so as to minimize 
duplication and confusion for the participant.
    Service coordinators must also develop a referral system to address 
participant needs beyond those addressed by the core services offered. 
The service coordinator must develop a functional referral system to 
provide participants referrals to other specialized services beyond 
core services that might not be met through specialized service 
providers. Through this referral process the service coordinator will 
ensure that that there is at least one provider of non-religious-based 
(secular) service if that same specialized service is offered through 
religious-based service by the sub-contractors. Services that the 
coordinator may provide referrals for include transitional housing, 
substance abuse treatment, health services (including mental health 
services and counseling), continuing education system (including 
alternative schools and community colleges), and the One-Stop Career 
Center. The services coordinator will maintain relationships with 
organizations/entities offering these specialized services and must 
keep updated information on each referral partner to ensure there is 
always a current list of referral partners. This referral list must be 
kept separate from the specialized service provider list. However, 
specialized service providers may also be listed on this referral list.
Specialized Service Provider
    Based upon an established performance-based contract with the grant 
recipient organization (services coordinator), specialized service 
provider organizations will offer specific services to participants. A 
single organization or its affiliates, cannot serve as both coordinator 
and a specialized service provider.
    The services coordinator will offer the participant a genuine and 
independent choice of providers. The services coordinator will then 
refer the participant to the chosen specialized services provider. The 
specialized service provider will receive both the participant and 
their needs assessment from the services coordinator. The specialized 
service provider will then use both the prior assessment and its own 
in-person meetings with the participant to develop an individual 
services plan, which will serve as a guide for both the provider and 
the participant as he/she works through the program. Any case 
management provided by the specialized service provider must also be 
coordinated with the services coordinator so as to minimize duplication 
and confusion for the participant.
    All specialized service providers will be required to provide the 
following core services:
    <bullet> Work readiness training (e.g. soft skills, life skills 
and/or basic skills);
    <bullet> Career counseling (e.g. one-on-one or group mentoring); 
and
    <bullet> Follow-up on participants' post program outcomes for a 
minimum of six months.
    In addition to core services, it is expected that specialized 
service providers offer other useful services for ex-offenders 
transitioning into the workplace. These supplementary services, offered 
either directly or through partnerships with other organizations, could 
include:
    <bullet> Counseling (including anger management, addiction, family, 
social reintegration, etc.)
    <bullet> Transitional housing
    <bullet> Substance abuse and alcohol prevention
    <bullet> Child care services
    <bullet> Mentoring
    <bullet> English proficiency courses
    <bullet> Job placement
    <bullet> Alternative secondary school offerings (GED preparation)
    <bullet> Financial literacy
    <bullet> Job retention services
    <bullet> Supportive services (e.g. bus passes, interview clothing, 
fees for GED testing, etc.)
    <bullet> Tutoring, study skills training, instruction, and degree 
attainment (e.g. GED, Associates Degree or technical certificate)
    Specialized service providers will be compensated on a per-capita 
basis based upon their contract with the services coordinator. Partial 
compensation will be provided on a per-capita basis after the 
participant has enrolled in the program. The remainder payment(s) will 
be based on attainment of specific outcomes: completion of course 
curriculum, job placement, job retention and non-recidivism.
    Specialized service providers will be responsible for tracking 
outcomes on clients served, services provided, completion of services 
rendered, job placement, job retention, earnings and recidivism. 
Specialized service providers must report back to the services 
coordinator on all the services received and outcomes for participants 
served under the grant.
    As part of the grant application process, the applicant must submit 
a detailed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with at least three 
specialized service providers that describe the specialized service 
provider's firm commitment to act as a subcontractor in the program. 
This MOA will describe the role of the services coordinator and 
specialized service provider, the core and supplementary services to be 
provided, and the method of payment for these services. A minimum of 
five specialized service providers must be a part of each grant program 
when services begin. Specialized service providers include faith-based 
and community organizations. Specialized service providers are to be 
selected without regard to religious character affiliation, or lack 
thereof. At least one specialized service provider at each site, 
however, must offer non-religious-based (secular) services. 
Participants may not choose more than one specialized service provider 
from whom to receive core services.
Partnership With Workforce Investment System
    A grantee must develop a functioning referral system with its local 
One-Stop Career Center and Workforce Investment Board. While the nature 
of these referral relationships will vary, grantees may enter into 
agreements with the

[[Page 19029]]

workforce investment system to assist with assessments of participants, 
development of individual employment service strategies, enrollment in 
training programs, and placement into jobs.
    As part of the application process, the applicant must submit an 
MOA with their local Workforce Investment Board/One-Stop Operator that 
describes the One-Stop Operator's firm commitment to entering into, at 
a minimum, a formal referral partnership with the applicant. This 
formal partnership should produce two-way client referrals from the 
One-Stop Career Center to the applicant and from the applicant to the 
One-Stop Career Center on which the applicant will be required to 
report, as well as appropriate access to One-Stop Career Center 
resources. The MOA must describe that the One-Stop Operator has 
acknowledged that the applicant organization is complementing the 
services provided by the One-Stop Career Center. If an agreement with 
the One-Stop Operator is not provided, the applicant should, at a 
minimum, demonstrate that the One-Stop Operator was contacted and 
provided a sufficient opportunity for response.
Partnership With Local Corrections Agency
    The applicant must also submit an MOA from at least one local 
corrections agency with which the applicant will work on this project. 
This document will also describe the corrections agency's firm 
commitment to entering a formal referral partnership with the 
applicant.
    This formal partnership will produce referrals from the local 
detention facility to the grantee. This may include pre-release 
sessions with soon-to-be-released inmates on the nature of the programs 
and developing important pre-release relationships, especially in the 
area of mentoring, where appropriate. The agreement must describe that 
the corrections agency has acknowledged that the applicant organization 
and its subcontractors will provide reentry services that will assist 
former inmates. If an agreement with the local corrections agency is 
not provided, the applicant should, at a minimum, demonstrate that the 
agency was contacted and provided sufficient opportunity for response. 
Similar agreements with parole and probation agencies are also 
encouraged.
Outcomes
    As this is an employment-focused program, the U.S. Department of 
Labor is funding specific employment-based services and outcomes. Four 
outcome measures will be used to measure success in these grants: 
Entered employment rate, employment retention rate, earnings, and 
recidivism rate. In addition, grantees will report on a number of 
leading indicators that will serve as predictors of success. Leading 
indicators will include: Enrollment rate; participation in education/
training; workforce preparation; mentoring; attainment of degrees and 
certificates; reduced substance abuse; proportion of enrollees in 
stable housing (beyond 90 days post-release); and proportion of 
enrollees complying with parole conditions. In applying for these 
grants, grantees and their sub-contractors agree to submit updated 
Management Information System (MIS) data on enrollee characteristics, 
services provided, placements, outcomes, and follow-up status.
Evaluation
    There will be a formal evaluation of this initiative. In applying 
for these grants, applicants and their sub-contractors agree to 
cooperate in this evaluation by providing enrollment and participation 
data and other information during all years of the project.

2. DOL's Youth Vision

    The White House Taskforce on Disadvantaged Youth notes that despite 
the billions of Federal, State, local, and private dollars spent on 
needy youth and their families, many out-of-school, at-risk youth are 
currently being left behind in our economy because of a lack of program 
focus and emphasis on outcomes. Well-designed and coordinated programs 
offer youth who have become disconnected from mainstream institutions 
and systems additional opportunities to successfully transition to 
adult roles and responsibilities. DOL's Youth Vision focuses on four 
major areas: Improving alternative education services to youth, meeting 
the demands of business, especially in high-growth industries and 
occupations, serving the neediest youth, and improving program 
performance. Applicants are encouraged to demonstrate a commitment to 
these objectives in their program design and application.

3. The President's Faith-Based and Community Initiative

    President Bush's Faith-Based and Community Initiative is built on a 
simple conviction: America can do better for our neighbors in need when 
we enlist every partner willing to join in service. Advancing this goal 
first requires ensuring a ``level playing field'' for all organizations 
willing to join with the government in service, including ones that may 
have been excluded in the past. The Center for Faith-Based and 
Community Initiatives at the U.S. Department of Labor (the Center) has 
worked to eliminate any barriers preventing effective organizations 
from partnering with the government. Equally important, the Center 
works with all agencies of the Department of Labor to cultivate public/
nonprofit/private partnerships nationwide to make its services both 
more comprehensive and more effective.
    A critical aspect of removing barriers and forging new partnerships 
involves expanding opportunities for choice-based social services. In 
addition, because participants make an independent choice among 
providers, the organizations providing services enjoy greater 
flexibility to incorporate elements that would not otherwise be 
permitted in more typical government-funded programs, including 
religious aspects. This freedom results in a broader and more diverse 
social safety net since organizations that may have had little interest 
in partnering with government programs under more typical scenarios may 
be willing to become providers of government-funded services. While 
more traditional social services may be ideal for some program 
participants, others may benefit tremendously from the unique and 
innovative programs offered by new providers. The opportunity to make 
real choices can also serve to empower program participants and 
increase their sense of engagement in the services they receive.
    Whatever the social service may be, faith-based and community 
organizations have an indispensable role to play. Their networks of 
dedicated volunteers, local knowledge, and deep roots in their 
communities provide a tremendous complement to more traditional 
government-funded programs. This enables maximum impact for taxpayer 
dollars. Most significantly, the service of faith-based and community 
organizations can have a deep and abiding impact on the individuals 
they serve and the community as a whole.
    Applicants are encouraged to demonstrate a commitment to these 
objectives in their program design and application.

4. Areas of ETA Emphasis for This SGA

    ETA has developed six areas of emphasis for projects funded through 
this SGA: (1) Increasing service provider choice for ex-offenders 
returning to their communities; (2) helping ex-offenders connect to 
local FBCOs to receive support services that increase

[[Page 19030]]

attachment to the labor market; (3) building strategic partnerships; 
(4) leveraging resources; (5) achieving high-performance outcomes; and 
(6) replicability. These areas of emphasis are taken into account in 
the evaluation of proposals.
    <bullet> Increasing Service Provider Choice for Ex-Offenders 
Returning to Their Communities. This SGA places great emphasis on 
ensuring that participants are able to choose the organization and 
services that will best suit their needs. Not only does this give the 
participant a sense of ownership of the program, it also enables him/
her to select the services that address their specific needs. This SGA 
also requires a diverse assortment of providers for the participant to 
choose from. It is anticipated that broader choices and greater 
participant engagement will provide higher employment and lower 
recidivism among participants.
    <bullet> Helping Ex-Offenders Connect to Local FBCOs To Receive 
Support Services That Increase Attachment to the Labor Market. Faith-
based and community organizations are well equipped to provide aid and 
support to people in need. Many such organizations have been serving 
for decades in some of America's most resource-poor neighborhoods, and 
are strengthened by dedicated volunteers, local knowledge, and deep 
roots in their communities. This SGA will help establish formalized 
links with FBCOs that already provide many valuable support services to 
ex-offenders returning to the community, and will draw upon their 
strengths to provide support that will enable ex-offenders to succeed 
in the workplace and avoid repeating past mistakes.
    <bullet> Building Strategic Partnerships. ETA believes that 
strategic partnerships between faith-based and community organizations 
and the public workforce investment system, business and industry 
representatives, the correctional system, and education and training 
providers such as community colleges, are vital to ensuring that 
participants gain the skills and competencies necessary to enter and 
advance in the workplace.
    In order to maximize success, each partner must be engaged in its 
area of strength and have a clearly defined role in the partnership. 
For example, faith-based and community organizations can provide a 
highly personal connection to participants, as well as services that 
can prove decisive in job retention, such as mentoring and soft-skills 
training. Employers provide work-based opportunities for participants. 
Community colleges and other education and training providers assist in 
providing training for new and incumbent workers. The corrections 
system makes referrals to the program and can provide external impetus 
to participants for their own success. The workforce investment system 
may assist with the assessments of participants, develop individual 
service strategies, enroll them in training programs, place trained 
participants into jobs and conduct follow-up. A wide range of other 
partner roles and responsibilities can be included in the design and 
implementation of a beneficiary-choice model.
    <bullet> Leveraging Resources. Applicants should utilize funds and 
resources from other entities. Leveraging resources in the context of 
strategic partnerships accomplishes three goals: (1) using the entirety 
of resources available through a clearly defined strategy; (2) 
increasing stakeholder investment in the project at all levels, 
including design and implementation phases; and (3) broadening the 
impact of the project itself.
    Businesses, faith-based and community organizations, and 
foundations often invest resources to support workforce development. In 
addition, other government programs may provide resources, including 
WIA funds reserved for Statewide activities, local WIA Youth formula 
funds, State juvenile justice funds, Federal No Child Left Behind 
education funds, Chaffee, Runaway and Homeless funds and State 
education funds. ETA encourages applicants and their partners to be 
entrepreneurial as they seek out, utilize, and sustain these resources 
while creating effective, innovative projects for ex-offenders.
    Applicants will be rated in part on their ability to demonstrate 
commitments of leveraged resources. These leveraged resources may be 
either in-kind or cash contributions. Please note, Rating Criteria D 
specifically awards points for the use of leveraged resources. While 
the failure to offer leveraged resources as a part of an application 
will not preclude consideration of the application, it will place the 
applicant at a significant disadvantage since one of the evaluation 
criteria evaluates the quality of leveraged resources. Applicants must 
describe in detail how such leveraged funds will be used and 
demonstrate how these funds will contribute to the goals of the 
project.
    <bullet> High Performance Outcomes. DOL expects that 225 ex-
offenders through the adult criminal justice system will be served 
during the first year of operation at each site awarded a grant under 
this SGA. The measured outcomes for this initiative will include 
education or job training, placement in employment, increased 
retention, and reduced recidivism. The ultimate success of this project 
will hinge upon the strength of these quantifiable results.
    <bullet> Replicability. As mentioned above, this SGA will test the 
beneficiary-choice model in the context of services provided to ex-
offenders. If successful, materials will be created from this program 
that will provide substantive guidance to Federal, State and local 
agencies for implementation of beneficiary-choice contracting--both in 
reentry services and a wide array of other government-funded services.

5. Examples of Projects That Could Be Funded Under This Solicitation

    Types of projects that could be funded under this SGA include, but 
are not limited to, the following examples. Please note that these are 
only examples, and applicants are encouraged to propose alternative 
approaches. All proposals will be judged on their own merits.
Example 1
    Project Hope of Sklar County, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, 
is awarded a $1,000,000 grant under the Beneficiary-Choice Contracting 
Pilot Program. It will serve as the central services coordinator. 
Project Hope formalizes its plans and documents laying out the services 
it and its future partners will provide, and then aggressively 
publicizes an informational meeting for social service providers that 
would be willing to contract with Project Hope to serve ex-offenders.
    Ultimately, Project Hope enters formal contracts with six non-
profit organizations and one for-profit organization: Dreams Unlimited, 
Kronberg Service Center, Shepherd of the Valley Fellowship, The Sklar 
Jewish Union, Anglican Ministries, and Briggs Work Aid, Inc. Project 
Hope will be known as the ``services coordinator,'' and the six 
contractors will be known as specialized service providers. At least 
one of the non-profit organizations, Kronberg Service Center, will 
offer an entirely non-religious program, as does Briggs Work Aid, Inc.
    Project Hope will identify and recruit ex-offenders, working 
closely with the local criminal justice agency. It will provide basic 
intake services and needs assessments to each participant, and offer 
participants information on the differences between each of the six 
specialized service providers. Participants are then free to choose 
from among the six providers for the services

[[Page 19031]]

they will receive. Participants that opt to receive services with 
religious content must sign an informed consent form.
    In addition to its contractual relationships with the specialized 
service providers, Project Hope will provide participants with an in-
depth referral list of service providers that includes both religious-
based and non-religious-based (secular) specialized services. In 
addition, it maintains regular contact with the local One-Stop Career 
Center, ensuring that participants make full use of all services 
available through the local One-Stop Career Center, including 
Individual Training Accounts to address their needs beyond those met by 
the core services provided.
    Once the participant is referred to the specialized service 
provider, Project Hope will continue to provide overall case 
management, ensure that the participant has access to other available 
complementary resources, and compile data collection on all 
participants.
    Under the terms of the contracts, each of the six organizations 
will provide certain core services, including work readiness training 
(e.g. soft skills, life skills and/or basic skills), career counseling 
and follow-up with participants post program activity. In addition, 
each organization will make a unique combination of supplementary 
services available to the participants it serves. For example, Dreams 
Unlimited offers counseling, substance abuse prevention training, 
English proficiency courses, financial literacy education and job 
placement services. Both the Kronberg Service Center and Shepherd of 
the Valley Fellowship offer one-on-one mentoring, GED preparation, and 
child care services. Sklar Jewish Union offers group mentoring, 
individual counseling, and a six-month residential substance abuse 
recovery program. Anglican Ministries provides transitional housing and 
child care services. Briggs Work Aid, Inc provides job placement and 
retention services as well as several different supportive services 
including bus passes and appropriate interview attire.
    The contracts set out clear guidelines for compensation to the 
specialized service providers, which is provided monthly on a per 
capita basis. Project Hope will provide $500 for each participant that 
chooses and is subsequently registered by a specialized service 
provider. It will then provide $400 for each participant that completes 
the specialized service providers' soft skills curriculum. Project Hope 
will provide additional performance-based compensation of $1,800 per 
participant that achieves one of three major milestones: Holding 
unsubsidized employment for more than 90 days, completing an accredited 
vocational training certification or at least one semester at an 
accredited institution of higher learning, or acquiring a GED.
    Project Hope will contribute $75,000 of its own funds so that it 
can serve approximately 300 participants rather than the minimum of 
225. In addition, it has received a $100,000 grant from the Lokkesmoe 
Foundation that Project Hope will use to pay the community college or 
vocational school fees of participants that opt to seek further 
education.
Example 2
    The local One-Stop Career Center serves as the services coordinator 
and enters contracts with specialized service providers to deliver 
services. The One-Stop Career Center will provide all of the services 
of the services coordinator listed above--identify and recruit ex-
offenders, identify and recruit specialized service providers, provide 
basic intake services, including assessment of needs and interests, 
offer each participant a choice among service providers (including at 
least one provider of non-religious-based (secular) services), require 
informed consent forms of individuals choosing services with religious 
content and provide case management. The One-Stop Career Center will 
also be uniquely suited to making full use of all training and 
placement services available through the workforce investment system--
including, when possible, Individual Training Accounts. In addition to 
its contractual relationships with the specialized service providers, 
the One-Stop Career Center will provide participants with an in-depth 
referral list of service providers that includes both religious-based 
and non-religious-based (secular) services.
    As grant manager, the One-Stop Career Center is also responsible 
for designing guidelines for specialized service providers' 
participation, recruiting providers of targeted services, ensuring at 
least one provider of non-religious services, establishing performance-
based contracts with the provider organizations, overseeing grant data 
collection procedures and compilation and fiscal controls, delivering 
contract payment to service providers, and performing all other aspects 
of managing the Federal grant. The One-Stop Career Center also has an 
agreement with the local criminal justice agency for participant 
recruitment purposes.
    The network of specialized service providers is composed of faith-
based and community organizations (FBCOs) as well as other service 
providers.
    Each specialized service provider must enter a contract committing 
to provide soft-skills training (i.e. work readiness, life skills and/
or basic skills), career counseling and long-term follow up, and most 
providers provide supplementary services. Providers receive 
compensation of $300 as a registration fee for each participant that 
chooses to enter their program. In addition, providers will receive 
$900 for each participant that completes the soft-skills training 
offered by the provider. They will receive $900 if the participant 
remains out of prison for 90 days. They will receive $500 if the 
participant remains retained in employment for 90 days, and an 
additional $500 for 180 days of employment. (The One-Stop Career Center 
is aware that if all participants achieved performance goals, the cost 
of $3,100 per participant it would add up to more than the grant 
provides. However, the One-Stop Career Center will make up for this 
short-fall both by additional financial contributions and the fact that 
a certain percentage of program participants will not achieve 
performance goals.)

Part II. Award Information

1. Award Amount

    ETA intends to fund grants for five projects, to serve 225 
individuals (age 18 to 29) through the adult criminal justice system, 
per year, at an average annual grant amount of $1,000,000 per site. 
Applicants may submit proposals within the range of $800,000 to 
$1,200,000. A larger or smaller amount may be requested based on the 
number of participants proposed to serve, but deviations from this 
amount must be clearly justified in the application.

2. Period of Performance

    The period of grant performance will be 22 months from the date of 
execution of the grant document. This performance period shall include 
4 months of organizational preparation, 12 months of service delivery, 
and six months of follow-up data collection. Depending on the 
availability of funds and satisfactory performance, additional years of 
funding may be available for these grants. In addition, ETA may elect 
to exercise its option to award no-cost extensions to these grants for 
an additional period based on the satisfactory progress of the program 
in placing participants in jobs, education, training, mentoring, and 
reducing the recidivism of participants.
    The probability of continuation of grants beyond the initial period 
of grant

[[Page 19032]]

performance will be greatly reduced for those grantees that do not 
begin providing services by the end of the first four months. No more 
than ten percent of the services coordinator budget is to be used in 
the four-month planning period. Grantees are expected to reserve a 
portion of their grant funding to continue to report on recidivism and 
employment outcomes for up to six months after services end.

Part III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants

    Applicants must be either a faith-based or community organization 
that is exempt from taxation pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) at the 
time of application submission, or a government agency (such as a 
Workforce Investment Board, One-Stop Career Center, corrections agency, 
State or local government, housing authority). The applicant will be 
the lead organization that will represent a partnership system that 
consists of the public workforce system, the local corrections agency 
and other social services providers (including faith-based and 
community organizations). At least one of the contracted specialized 
service providers offered to participants must offer a program that 
contains no religious content.
    As stated above, applicants must demonstrate the existence of a 
partnership with both their local Workforce Investment Board/One-Stop 
Career Center system and their local corrections agency. In addition to 
relationships with both these organizations and specialized services 
sub-contractors, collaborations are also encouraged with other 
entities, including child welfare and foster care agencies, substance 
abuse treatment providers, social service agencies, education and 
training providers, business representatives, transitional housing 
providers, health care providers, etc. These providers may fill a role 
as sub-grantees. A single organization, or its affiliates, cannot serve 
as both coordinator and specialized service provider.
    ETA expects to make five awards including a minimum of two to 
faith-based and community organizations.

2. Grantee Resources

    There is no matching requirement for these grants. However, 
applicants will be rated in part on their ability to demonstrate 
commitments of leveraged resources.

3. Other Eligibility Requirements

    Beneficiary Eligibility. Individuals aged 18 to 29 who have been 
convicted of a Federal or State crime through the adult criminal 
justice system, are returning from a State institution, and are not 
currently enrolled in a traditional program may be served by these 
grants. This includes but is not limited to individuals returning from 
correctional facilities or detention centers, half-way houses, and 
those under State supervision that have transitioned from a State 
prison to a local jail prior to release. Participants must enroll in 
the program within 60 days after release from the criminal justice 
system.
    Veterans Priority. This program is subject to the provisions of the 
``Jobs for Veterans Act,'' (Pub. L. 107-288, 38 U.S.C. 4215), which 
provides priority of service to veterans and spouses of certain 
veterans for the receipt of employment, training, and placement 
services in any job training program directly funded, in whole or in 
part, by DOL. To obtain priority of service, a veteran must meet the 
program's eligibility requirements. ETA Training and Employment 
Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 5-03 (Sept. 16, 2003) at http://www.doleta.gov/Seniors/other_docs/TEN5_03_VETS.pdf provides general 
guidance on the scope of the veterans priority statute and its effect 
on current employment and training programs.

Part IV. Application and Submission Information

1. Address To Request Application Package

    This announcement includes all information and links to forms 
needed to apply for this funding opportunity.

2. Content and Form of Application Submission

    The proposal must consist of two (2) separate and distinct parts, 
Parts I and II. Applications that fail to adhere to the instructions in 
this section will be considered non-responsive and will not be 
considered.
    Part I of the proposal is the Cost Proposal and must include the 
following three items:
    <bullet> The Standard Form (SF) 424, ``Application for Federal 
Assistance'' (also available at http://www.grants.gov/agencies/approved_standard_forms.jsp#1). The SF 424 must clearly identify the 
applicant and be signed by an individual with authority to enter into a 
grant agreement. Upon confirmation of an award, the individual signing 
the SF424 on behalf of the applicant shall be considered the authorized 
representative of the applicant.
    <bullet> All applicants for Federal grant and funding opportunities 
are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet (DUNS) number. See Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) Notice of Final Policy Issuance, 68 FR 
38402 (June 27, 2003). Applicants must supply their DUNS number on the 
SF 424. The DUNS number is a nine-digit identification number that 
uniquely identifies business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy 
and there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access this Web site: 
http://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-5711.
    <bullet> The Budget Information Form SF 424A (available at http://www.doleta.gov/sga/forms.cfm). In preparing the SF 424A, the applicant 
must provide a concise narrative explanation to support the request. 
The budget narrative should break down the budget and leveraged 
resources by the project activities specified in the technical proposal 
and should discuss precisely how the administrative costs support the 
project goals. The budget narrative must also provide a detailed back-
up budget that includes the number of staff to be hired by job title.
    Part II of the application is the Technical Proposal, which 
demonstrates the applicant's capabilities to plan and implement the 
grant project in accordance with the provisions of this SGA. The 
guidelines for the content of the Technical Proposal are provided in 
Section V(1) of this SGA; emphasis should be placed on the areas listed 
in Section I(4) of this SGA. The Technical Proposal is limited to 
fifteen (15) double-spaced, single-sided 8.5 inch by 11 inch pages with 
twelve point text font and one-inch margins. Any pages over the 15 page 
limit will not be reviewed.
    In addition, the applicant must provide:
    <bullet> MOAs from the partnering agencies,
    <bullet> MOAs from the specialized service providers,
    <bullet> a time line outlining project activities, and a
    <bullet> two-page Executive Summary summarizing the proposed 
project and applicant profile information including: (1) Applicant 
name; (2) project title; and (3) requested funding level.
    These additional materials do not count against the fifteen (15) 
page limit for the Technical Proposal. The additional materials may not 
exceed (15) fifteen pages in addition to the Technical Proposal.
    Please note that applicants that fail to provide a SF 424, SF 424A 
and/or a budget narrative will be removed from consideration prior to 
the technical

[[Page 19033]]

review process. If the proposal calls for integrating WIA or other 
Federal funds or includes other leveraged resources, these funds should 
not be listed on the SF 424 or SF 424A Budget Information Form, but 
should be described in the budget narrative and in Part II of the 
proposal. The amount of Federal funding requested for the entire period 
of performance should be shown together on the SF 424 and SF 424A 
Budget Information Form. Applicants are also encouraged, but not 
required, to submit OMB Survey No. 1890-0014: Survey on Ensuring Equal 
Opportunity for Applicants, which can be found at http://www.doleta.gov/sga/forms.cfm.
    Except for the discussion of match and leveraged resources in 
response to the evaluation criteria, no cost data or reference to 
prices should be included in the technical proposal. Please note that 
applicants should not send letters of commitment or support separately 
to ETA because letters are tracked through a different system and will 
not be attached to the application for review.
    Applications may be submitted electronically on www.grants.gov or 
in hard-copy via U.S. mail, professional delivery service, or hand 
delivery. These processes are described in further detail in Section 
IV(3). Applicants submitting proposals in hard-copy must submit an 
original signed application (including the SF 424) and one (1) ``copy-
ready'' version free of bindings, staples or protruding tabs to ease in 
the reproduction of the proposal by DOL. Applicants submitting 
proposals in hard-copy are also requested, though not required, to 
provide an electronic copy of the proposal on CD-ROM.

3. Submissions Dates, Times, and Address

    The closing date for receipt of applications under this 
announcement is May 25, 2007. Applications must be received at the 
address below no later than 4 p.m. (Eastern Time), except as identified 
in the ``Late Applications'' paragraph below. Applications sent by e-
mail, telegram, or facsimile (FAX) will not be accepted. Applications 
that do not meet the conditions set forth in this notice will not be 
considered. No exceptions to the mailing and delivery requirements set 
forth in this notice will be granted.
    Mailed applications must be addressed to the U.S. Department of 
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Division of Federal 
Assistance, Attention: Eric Luetkenhaus, Reference SGA/DFA PY-06-14, 
200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N4716, Washington, DC 20210. 
Applicants are advised that mail delivery in the Washington area may be 
delayed due to mail decontamination procedures. Hand delivered 
applications will be received at the above address.
    Applicants may apply online at http://www.grants.gov by the 
deadline specified above. Any application received after the deadline 
will not be accepted. For applicants submitting electronic applications 
via Grants.gov, please note that it may take several days to complete 
the ``Get Started'' steps to register with Grants.gov at http://www.grants.gov/GetStarted. It is strongly recommended that these 
applicants immediately initiate this step in order to avoid unexpected 
delays that could result in the disqualification of their application. 
If submitted electronically through http://www.grants.gov, applicants 
should save application documents as a .doc or .pdf file.
    Late Applications. Any application received after the exact date 
and time specified for receipt at the office designated in this notice 
will not be considered, unless it is received before awards are made, 
was properly addressed, and: (a) Was sent by U.S. Postal Service 
registered or certified mail not later than the fifth calendar day 
before the date specified for receipt of applications (e.g., an 
application required to be received by the 20th of the month must be 
post marked by the 15th of that month) or (b) was sent by professional 
overnight delivery service or submitted on Grants.gov to the address 
not later than one working day prior to the date specified for receipt 
of applications. It is highly recommended that online submissions be 
completed one working day prior to the date specified for receipt of 
applications to ensure that the applicant still has the option to 
submit by overnight delivery service in the event of any electronic 
submission problems. ``Post marked'' means a printed, stamped or 
otherwise placed impression (exclusive of a postage meter machine 
impression) that is readily identifiable, without further action, as 
having been supplied or affixed on the date of mailing by an employee 
of the U.S. Postal Service. Therefore, applicants should request the 
postal clerk to place a legible hand cancellation ``bull's eye'' 
postmark on both the receipt and the package. Failure to adhere to the 
above instructions will be a basis for a determination of non-
responsiveness. Evidence of timely submission by a professional 
overnight delivery service must be demonstrated by equally reliable 
evidence created by the delivery service provider indicating the time 
and place of receipt.
    There will be an informational webinar held for this grant 
competition. Information on the date/time of this webinar and a 
recording for applicants who cannot attend will be available on http://www.dol.gov/cfbci.

4. Intergovernmental Review

    This funding opportunity is not subject to Executive Order (EO) 
12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.''

5. Funding Restrictions

    All proposal costs must be necessary and reasonable in accordance 
with Federal guidelines. Determinations of allowable costs will be made 
in accordance with the applicable Federal cost principles, as 
identified in OMB Circulars A-122, A-87, A-21 or at 48 CFR part 31 (See 
29 CFR 95.27, 97.22). Disallowed costs are those charges to a grant 
that the grantor agency or its representative determines not to be 
allowed in accordance with the applicable Federal cost principles or 
other conditions contained in the grant. Applicants will not be 
entitled to reimbursement of pre-award costs.
    Regulations governing the treatment in government programs of 
religious organizations and religious activities can be found at 29 CFR 
part 2, subpart D. Grantees and subawardees are expected to be aware of 
and observe the regulations in this subpart. Provisions relating to the 
use of indirect Federal support, such as through vouchers or other 
choice mechanisms, are found within 29 CFR part 2, subpart D at 29 CFR 
2.33(c) and at 20 CFR 667.266. Additional information about the proper, 
constitutional use of ``indirect'' Federal financial assistance can be 
found in Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) 1-05. See 
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2088.
    Due to the fact that subawardees are paid through indirect funding 
(the beneficiary-choice contracting model), subawardees may make 
inherently religious activities (e.g. religious instruction, prayer, 
proselytizing, etc.) an integrated part of their federally-supported 
program and may require participants to participate in them. Indirect 
assistance may be used for religious activities, because the customer 
has exercised his/her genuine and independent choice by freely 
selecting the program with religious aspects or content from among a 
variety of options, both secular and religious. As a result, 
participation in the religious activities is considered voluntary. The

[[Page 19034]]

recipient, therefore, may use indirect Federal assistance to train a 
participant in religious activities. However, pursuant to Section 
188(a)(3) of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, 29 U.S.C. 
2938(a)(3), a subawardee may not employ participants to construct, 
operate, or maintain any part of any facility that is used or to be 
used for religious instruction or as a place for religious worship 
(except with respect to the maintenance of a facility that is not 
primarily or inherently devoted to sectarian instruction or religious 
worship, in a case in which the organization operating the facility is 
part of a program or activity providing services to participants). See 
29 CFR 37.6(f).
    Indirect Costs. As specified in OMB Circular Cost Principles, 
indirect costs are those that have been incurred for common or joint 
objectives and cannot be readily identified with a particular cost 
objective. In order to utilize grant funds for indirect costs incurred, 
the applicant must obtain an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement with its 
Federal cognizant agency either before or shortly after the grant 
award.
    Administrative Costs. Under the WIA, Preparing Ex-Offenders for the 
Workplace through Beneficiary-Choice Contracting, an entity that 
receives a grant to carry out a project or program may not use more 
than 10 percent of the amount of the grant to pay administrative costs 
associated with the program or project. Administrative costs could be 
both direct and indirect costs and are defined at 20 CFR 667.220. 
Administrative costs do not need to be identified separately from 
program costs on the SF 424A Budget Information Form. They should be 
discussed in the budget narrative and tracked through the grantee's 
accounting system. Although there will be administrative costs 
associated with the managing of the partnership as it relates to 
specific grant activity, the primary use of funding should be to 
support the actual training activity(ies). To claim any administrative 
costs that are also indirect costs, the applicant must obtain an 
indirect cost rate agreement as described above.
    Expenditures by the services coordinator on its own activities and 
expenses cannot account for more than 40% of total grant funds. This 
includes funds reserved for services and program administration, 
including technical assistance and oversight. At least 60% must be 
spent on services for participants through specialized service 
providers serving program participants.

6. Other Submission Requirements

    Withdrawal of Applications. Applications may be withdrawn by 
written notice or telegram (including mailgram) received at any time 
before an award is made. Applications may be withdrawn in person by the 
applicant or by an authorized representative thereof, if the 
representative signs a receipt for the proposal.

V. Application Review Information

1. Rating Criteria

    This section identifies and describes the criteria that will be 
used to evaluate the proposals submitted in response to this 
solicitation. These criteria and point values are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Criterion                             Points
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Need for the Project.......................................        10
B. Program Management and Organization Capacity...............        25
C. Project Design and Service Strategy........................        40
D. Linkages to Key Partners and Leveraged Resources...........        25
                                                               ---------
    Total Possible Points.....................................       100
------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Need for the Project (10 Points)
    The applicant should demonstrate the need for the project by 
providing information on the number of ex-offenders in the area to be 
served and the justification of the need for the project in the 
community served by the grant. Use local data to identify the number of 
ex-offenders between the ages of 18 and 29 returning to your community 
through the adult criminal justice system and how this compares with 
the State or county as a whole. If there are particular neighborhoods 
within the city in which you plan to focus this grant, describe these 
neighborhoods and provide available data specific to that area. If 
possible, provide such data for the specific neighborhoods that you 
plan to serve rather than county-wide data.
    Discuss the services or lack of services in your area that exist to 
assist this population. Discuss the extent of criminal activity in the 
area that you will be serving and include all other information 
relevant to establishing the need for your project, including 
recidivism rate, crime rate, etc.
    Discuss the proposed service strategy; describe how it will address 
the lack of services available in the area targeted for the grant 
activities and how it will ensure that participants are prepared for 
and placed and retained in jobs.
    Scoring on this factor will be based on evidence of the following:
    <bullet> The need in the area served, including the crime rate and 
annual number of returnees to your city, county, State and proposed 
targeted area; and
    <bullet> The dearth of services provided to this population and how 
and why they need to be served.
    <bullet> Your description of how the proposed service strategy will 
address the identified gaps and ensure that clients are prepared for, 
placed in, and retained in jobs.
B. Program Management and Organization Capacity (25 points)
    The applicant should demonstrate the capability of providing the 
services proposed and of acting as the Services Coordinator.
    The Services Coordinator must (1) provide basic services; (2) 
manage contracts; and (3) establish and maintain strong referral 
networks for services not funded by this grant.
    (1) Provide Basic Services (5 Points). Describe the experience/
capacity of staff (or criteria for staff you will hire) and the 
organization, in serving ex-offenders. In addition, and as stated 
above, these services should include but are not limited to the 
following:
    <bullet> Identify and recruit participants;
    <bullet> Provide basic intake services, including assessment of 
needs and interests;
    <bullet> Offer each participant a free, independent, and informed 
choice among service providers--including at least one provider of 
secular non-religious-based services;
    <bullet> Require informed consent forms from individuals choosing 
services that contain religious content;
    <bullet> Provide ongoing case management (in coordination with the 
specialized services provider); and
    <bullet> Aid recipients in making full use of all services 
available through local One-Stop Career Center, including, when 
possible, Individual Training Accounts.
    <bullet> Recruit employers that are willing to employ program 
participants.
    (2) Manage Contracts (10 Points). Describe the experience/capacity 
of the organization's staff in managing contracts and managing sub-
contractors. Specifically include organizational capabilities and 
previous history of managing choice-based programs and data systems, 
infrastructure to manage and support choice-based programs, and any 
performance-based contracting experience. As stated above, these 
services should include but are not limited to the following:
    <bullet> Design guidelines and baseline criteria for service 
provider organizations' participation. These

[[Page 19035]]

objective criteria would require a level of quality in basic services 
offered. In addition, preference in selecting specialized service 
provider contractors should be given to organizations that provide a 
diverse offering of supplementary services;
    <bullet> Recruit a minimum of five specialized service providers--
including FBCOs;
    <bullet> Ensure at least one at least one provider of secular non-
religious-based services;
    <bullet> Establish performance-based contracts with service 
provider organizations;
    <bullet> Develop a data collection strategy and oversee the 
management information system (MIS) grant data collection procedures 
and compilation for all partners in the program;
    <bullet> Aid service providers in complying with necessary 
reporting and other compliance issues;
    <bullet> Deliver contract payments to service providers; and
    <bullet> Perform all other aspects of managing the Federal grant--
including fiscal controls.
    (3) Establish and Maintain a Strong Referral Network (10 Points). 
Describe the experience/capacity of the applicant and key grantee staff 
in working with other organizations that provide different services. 
Service coordinators must also develop a referral system to address 
participant needs beyond those addressed by the core services. The 
service coordinator must develop a functional referral system to 
provide participants referrals to other specialized services beyond 
core services that might not be met through specialized service 
providers. Through this referral process the service coordinator will 
ensure that that there is at least one provider of non-religious-based 
(secular) service if that same specialized service is offered through 
religious-based service by the sub-contractors. Services that the 
coordinator may provide referrals for include transitional housing, 
substance abuse treatment, health services (including mental health 
services and counseling), continuing education system (including 
alternative schools and community colleges), and the One-Stop Career 
Center. The services coordinator will maintain relationships with 
organizations/entities offering these specialized services and must 
keep updated information on each referral partner to ensure there is 
always a current list of referral partners. This referral list must be 
kept separate from the specialized service provider list.
    The applicant must also include a description of organizational 
capacity and the organization's track record as an intermediary, 
working with this population, and managing a grant of this size. 
Applicants must identify a project manager, discuss the proposed 
staffing pattern and the qualifications and experience of key staff 
members, provide detailed descriptions of the roles of the 
participating partners, and give evidence of the existence and 
utilization of data systems to track outcomes.
    Scoring on this factor will be based on evidence of the following:
    <bullet> The organization's capabilities and previous history of 
providing case management and assessment services to ex-offenders, 
including the basic services previously listed, managing grants and 
sub-contractors, including those compensated through a performance-
based process, and developing and maintaining strong partnerships with 
community service providers to which participants might be referred. 
Applicants must demonstrate the infrastructure to manage and support 
this type of program.
    <bullet> The time commitment of the proposed staff is sufficient to 
assure proper direction, management, and timely completion of the 
project.
    <bullet> The roles and contribution of staff, consultants, and 
collaborative organizations are clearly defined and linked to specific 
objects and tasks.
    <bullet> The background, experience, and other qualifications of 
the staff are sufficient to carry out their designated roles.
    <bullet> The applicant organization has the capacity to accomplish 
the goals and outcomes of the project, including project management, 
has appropriate systems to track outcome data and establishes and 
maintains a strong referral network.
    <bullet> The proposed referral plan including ensuring that that 
there is at least one provider of non-religious-based (secular) service 
if that same specialized service is offered through religious-based 
service by the sub-contractors.
C. Project Design and Service Strategy (40 points)
    Please describe your project design and service strategy. This 
section should be divided into six parts.
    I. Requirements for and Identification of Specialized Service 
Providers.
    II. Recruiting and Referral from the Criminal Justice System.
    III. Assessment and Initial Services for Participants.
    IV. Participant Opportunity to Choose/Referral to Specialized 
Provider.
    V. Case Management, Relationship with the Workforce Investment 
System and Referral for Supplemental Services or Training.
    VI. Expected Outcomes and Follow-Up Management with Specialized 
Providers and Ensuring Appropriate Grants Management and Outcomes.
I. Requirements for and Identification of Specialized Service Providers 
(5 Points)
    Describe the baseline requirements that are needed for 
organizations to become specialized service providers. How will the 
applicant identify and recruit a diversity of specialized service 
providers, including faith-based and community organizations? What 
types of agreements will the applicant enter into with these 
organizations? What steps will the applicant take (or has the applicant 
taken) to ensure that there is at least one provider of secular non-
religious-based services? What procedures with the applicant employ to 
ensure adequate diversity in services provided by the selected 
specialized services providers--including preference in selecting 
specialized service provider contractors should be given to 
organizations that provide a diverse offering of supplementary 
services? The applicant must submit a detailed Memorandum of Agreement 
(MOA) with at least three specialized service providers that describe 
the specialized service provider's firm commitment to act as a 
subcontractor in the program. This will describe the role of the 
services coordinator and specialized service provider, the services 
provided, and the method of payment for these services. A minimum of 
five specialized service providers must be a part of each grant program 
when services begin.
    Scoring on this criterion will be based on the applicant's ability 
to demonstrate:
    <bullet> The existence of an outreach/identification strategy which 
will be aggressive, inclusive and clear for potential providers--
including faith based and community organizations and at least one non-
religious provider.
    <bullet> The existence of guidelines and baseline criteria for 
service provider organizations' participation. These objective criteria 
would require a level of quality in basic services offered. In 
addition, preference in selecting specialized service provider 
contractors should be given to organizations that provide a diverse 
offering of supplementary services.
    <bullet> A plan for recruiting additional specialized service 
providers, including identification of basic requirement for 
participation as a specialized service

[[Page 19036]]

provider, and what additional services the applicant anticipates will 
be provided by additional specialized service providers.
    <bullet> MOAs with at least three specialized service providers. 
MOAs with additional specialized service providers are encouraged. A 
minimum of five specialized service providers must be a part of each 
grant program when services begin.
II. Recruiting and Referral From the Criminal Justice System (5 Points)
    Describe how participants will be recruited into the program. 
Identify and describe how the criminal justice system partners will 
refer participants to the program. Describe how coordination and 
communication will be maintained between probation and parole offices 
and the applicant, in the areas of recruiting, pre-release service 
provision, program participation and follow-up.
    Scoring on this criterion will be based on the applicant's ability 
to demonstrate:
    <bullet> The existence of a sound strategy for coordinating with 
the local criminal justice system for the referral of, and joint 
services for, participants into the program; and
    <bullet> The existence of a sound strategy for coordinating with 
the probation and parole offices throughout program involvement and 
during post-program follow-up.
III. Assessment and Initial Services for Participants (5 Points)
    Describe the services that will be provided to the participants 
when they are recruited into the program. Identify what assessment 
tools and methods will be used to determine the skills, aptitudes and 
needs of participants. Describe the specific strategies and methods 
that will be used to meet the different needs of the participant and 
how these build on services already available in the community.
    Scoring on this criterion will be based on the applicant's ability 
to demonstrate:
    <bullet> A quality assessment that will provide the applicant with 
the proper information needed to meet all of the needs of the 
participant, both through specialized service providers, and referrals 
to other community services.
IV. Participant Opportunity to Choose/ Referral to Specialized Provider 
(5 Points)
    Applicants should explain how participants will be referred once he 
or she has chosen a specialized services provider. Applicants will also 
describe how this choice will be explained to program participants and 
the process that will be used for the referral. Describe examples of 
specialized service providers and the types of services they will 
provide.
    Scoring on this criterion will be based on the applicant's ability 
to demonstrate:
    <bullet> A clear plan for how a free, independent and informed 
choice of service providers will be presented to and made by the 
participant.
V. Case Management, Relationship with the Workforce Investment System 
and Referral for Supplemental Services or Training (5 Points)
    Describe the case management strategy that your organization will 
use throughout the program. What services will be provided through case 
management and how often will you communicate with the participant to 
make sure he/she receives the services that are needed. Describe how 
the applicant will coordinate case management with the specialized 
services providers.
    Describe the approach that will be used in the project, including 
the sequence of services (i.e., assessments, training, etc.), how the 
specific services for participants are determined, and which partner/
specialized service provider will provide which services. In addition, 
identify the supportive services that will be provided to participants 
and describe how such services will facilitate participation. Identify 
which support services will be provided by the grantee pre- and post-
placement, as well as intra- and post-training. Indicate which services 
will be provided by project partners or from sources other than the 
grant.
    Describe the job placement strategies that will be used in the 
program. Describe the rationale for deciding which services are 
necessary for participants to attain, retain or advance in the job. 
Discuss the extent to which the One-Stop Career Center will assist in 
the job training, placement and retention efforts.
    Describe the approach for referring participants to supplemental 
services or training available from existing service providers in the 
community. Scoring on this criterion will be based on the applicant's 
ability to demonstrate:
    <bullet> A continuous and coordinated case management plan that 
will assist the participant through the entire program--including post 
placement;
    <bullet> The link between the basic service provider (the grantee), 
the specialized service provider, the workforce investment system, the 
criminal justice system, and other needed supportive services;
    <bullet> The referral process for linking participants to non-
partner service and job training providers operating in the community.
VI. Expected Outcomes and Follow-Up Management With Specialized 
Providers and Ensuring Appropriate Grants Management and Outcomes (15 
Points)
    DOL expects that each project site will serve 225 ex-offenders 
through the adult criminal justice system, ages 18-29, each year and 
that outcomes will include placement in employment, job retention, and 
reduced recidivism. While it is recognized that some participants will 
not achieve the desired outcomes, to be counted toward the 225 
``served'' a participant must receive at least registration and case 
management and be enrolled by the specialized service provider. At 
least 200 participants must receive soft-skills training and career 
counseling from a specialized service provider.
    As DOL expects this definition to be used for determining the 
number of participants served, applicants should expect to enroll more 
than 225 individuals as some participants may not arrive at the 
specialized service provider to which they are referred.
    As stated before, four outcome measures will be used to measure 
success in these grants: entered employment rate, employment retention 
rate, earnings, and recidivism rate. In addition, grantees will report 
on a number of leading indicators that will serve as predictors of 
success. Leading indicators will include: enrollment rate; 
participation in education/training; workforce preparation; mentoring; 
attainment of degrees and certificates; reduced substance abuse; 
proportion of enrollees in stable housing (beyond 90 days post-
release); and proportion of enrollees complying with parole conditions.
    Discuss the outcomes for the proposed project and how these 
outcomes will be attained, taking into consideration that participants 
entering this program may have low basic skills levels and may require 
extensive remediation and skills training. Also provide realistic 
numerical goals for each of these outcome measures. The discussion of 
outcome goals should include the methods proposed to collect and 
validate outcome data in a timely and accurate manner. Note that these 
will represent the expected levels of performance. DOL will negotiate 
the actual levels of performance on these

[[Page 19037]]

measures with grantees after grant award.
    Discuss the payment system for services provided.
    Discuss the data collected/reporting system for both the 
specialized services provider and the Service Coordinator. It is 
required that all applicants track employment for at least six months 
and recidivism for at least one year.
    Discuss the follow-up services that will be provided by the 
applicant and the specialized service provider after the participant 
has been placed into employment.
    Also, provide a timeline outlining project activities, including 
expected start-up, implementation, participant follow-up for 
performance outcomes, grant close-out and other activities. Provide an 
MOA from at least three potential specialized service providers. 
Describe a plan for sustainability once the grant is over, including a 
timeline. Describe efforts the applicant will make to ensure that the 
program is replicable.
    Scoring on this criterion will be based on the applicant's ability 
to demonstrate:
    <bullet> A service plan/project design that provides solutions to 
the challenges experienced by the ex-offender population to be served 
while addressing the need for training, employment and job retention;
    <bullet> Outcomes projected for the program, including whether the 
program structure is likely to produce the stated outcomes;
    <bullet> A solid data collection system that effectively tracks 
participants and outcomes;
    <bullet> A solid management structure that includes a payment 
schedule for specialized service providers;
    <bullet> The existence of a work plan that is responsive to the 
applicant's statement of need and target population, and that includes 
specific goals, objectives, activities, implementation strategies, and 
a timeline;
    <bullet> The ability of the applicant to achieve the stated 
outcomes within the time frame of the grant;
    <bullet> The appropriateness of the outcomes with respect to the 
requested level of funding;
    <bullet> The appropriateness of the payment system for services 
provided;
    <bullet> An MOA with at least three specialized service providers;
    <bullet> The extent to which the project is sustainable; and
    <bullet> The extent to which the project is replicable.
D. Linkages to Key Partners and Leveraged Resources (25 points)
    Linkages to Key Partners (20 points). Applicants must demonstrate 
the existence of partnerships. DOL encourages, and will be looking for, 
applications that go beyond the minimum level of partnerships and 
demonstrate broader, substantive, and sustainable partnerships. The 
applicant must identify the partners and explain the meaningful role 
each partner plays in the project as well as how resources will be 
leveraged among the partners.
    Describe plans to work as a partner with the local One-Stop Career 
Center to help the target population receive services, enter 
employment, and succeed in the workforce. If the applicant has not 
previously worked with a One-Stop Career Center, describe actions you 
have taken to develop a relationship with a One-Stop Career Center. If 
the applicant has worked with a One-Stop Career Center in the past, 
describe what actions have been taken to further develop the 
relationship. Attach an MOA from the local One-Stop Operator describing 
the formal referral partnership with the local Workforce Investment 
Boards and/or local One-Stop Operator(s) with whom the applicant is 
working or with whom the applicant has developed a relationship as this 
proposal has been developed. The MOA should define the applicant's 
plans to create a formal referral relationship with the One-Stop Career 
Center as a provider of services that complement the services offered 
by the One-Stop Career Center. This formal partnership should produce 
two-way client referrals from the One-Stop Career Center to the 
applicant and from the applicant to the One-Stop Career Center on which 
the applicant will be required to report.
    Describe plans to work as a partner with the local corrections 
agency. Attach an MOA from at least one local corrections agency with 
which the applicant will work on this project. This document should 
also describe the corrections agency's firm commitment to enter a 
formal referral partnership with the applicant. Discuss how this 
partnership will produce referrals from the local detention facility to 
the grantee. If applicable, discuss planned pre-release sessions with 
soon-to-be-released inmates on the specific elements of the proposed 
program--especially in the area of mentoring. The letter must describe 
that the corrections agency has acknowledged that the applicant 
organization provides reentry services that will assist former inmates. 
If possible, the letter should also include the corrections agencies 
agreement to assist in tracking recidivism of participants. If an 
agreement with the local corrections agency is not provided, the 
applicant should, at a minimum, demonstrate that the agency was 
contacted and provided a sufficient opportunity for response. Similar 
agreements with parole and probation agencies are also encouraged.
    Describe the relationships the applicant has with other non-profit 
organizations that provide similar or complementary services. Explain 
how the applicant will leverage pre-existing relationships and 
partnerships to help achieve the proposed goals for the target 
populations and how the applicant will avoid duplication of existing 
services. If no relationships with other non-profit organizations 
exist, explain the reason and how the applicant plans to develop new 
relationships.
    Scoring on this criterion will be based on: (a) the applicants 
ability to fully demonstrate the comprehensiveness of the partnerships 
and the degree to which each partner plays a committed role, either 
financial or non-financial in the proposed project; (b) the breadth and 
depth of each key partner's contribution, their knowledge and 
experience concerning grant activities and their ability to impact the 
success of the project; and (c) evidence, including MOAs, that key 
partners have expressed a clear dedication to the project and 
understand their areas of responsibility.
    Important factors include:
    <bullet> The extent to which the project will work collaboratively 
with the public workforce investment system;
    <bullet> The extent to which the project will work collaboratively 
with the local corrections agency;
    <bullet> The number of partners involved and their knowledge and 
experience concerning the proposed grant activities, and their ability 
to impact the success of the project;
    <bullet> The overall completeness of the partnership, including its 
ability to manage all aspects and stages of the project and to 
coordinate individual activities with the partnership as a whole;
    <bullet> Evidence that key partners have expressed a clear 
commitment to the project and understand their areas of responsibility, 
including an MOA from the key partners;
    <bullet> Evidence of a plan for interaction between partners at 
each stage of the project, from planning to execution; and
    <bullet> Evidence that the partnership has the capacity to achieve 
the outcomes of the proposed project.
    Leveraged Resources (5 points). Applicants should clearly describe 
any funds and resources leveraged in support of grant activities and 
demonstrate how these funds will be used to contribute to the goals of 
the

[[Page 19038]]

project. Applicants must describe in detail how such funds will be 
used, the source of funds, and how these funds will contribute to the 
goals of the project. This applies to funds leveraged from businesses, 
faith-based and community organizations, and Federal, State, local and/
or private organizations. The description of leveraged resources must 
be supported by explicit MOAs and describe the resource amount and type 
(in-kind, cash, etc.). For any leveraged resources, applicants should 
fully describe through the MOA how the value of the resources was 
calculated and how those resources support the grant program.
    Scoring on this factor will be based on the extent to which the 
applicant fully describes the amount, commitment, nature, and quality 
of leveraged resources. Applicants will be scored based on the degree 
to which the source and use of funds is clearly explained and the 
extent to which leveraged resources are fully integrated into the 
project to support grant outcomes. Important elements of the 
explanation include:
    <bullet> Which partners have contributed leveraged resources and 
the extent of each contribution, including an itemized description of 
each contribution;
    <bullet> The quality of leveraged resources, including the purpose 
of the funds and the extent to which each contribution will be used to 
further the goals of the project; and
    <bullet> Evidence, stated in the MOAs, that key partners have 
expressed a clear commitment to provide the contribution.

2. Review and Selection Process

    Applications will be accepted after the publication of this 
announcement until the closing date. A technical review panel will make 
careful evaluation of applications against the criteria set forth in 
Section V.1 of this Solicitation. These criteria are based on the 
policy goals, priorities, and emphases set forth in this SGA. Up to 100 
points may be awarded to an application based on the required 
information described in Section V of this Solicitation. The ranked 
scores will serve as a primary basis for selection of applications for 
funding, in conjunction with other factors such as urban, rural, and 
geographic balance; the availability of funds; the proportion of 
governmental and non-profit grantees; and which proposals are most 
advantageous to the Government. The panel results are advisory in 
nature and not binding on the Grant Officer, who may consider any 
information that comes to his attention. DOL may elect to award the 
grant(s) with or without prior discussions with the applicants. Should 
a grant be awarded without discussions, the award will be based on the 
applicant's signature on the SF 424, which constitutes a binding offer.

Part VI. Award Administration Information

1. Award Notices

    All award notifications will be posted on the ETA Homepage at 
http://www.doleta.gov.

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

    All grantees, including faith-based organizations, will be subject 
to all applicable Federal laws (including provisions of appropriation 
laws), regulations, and the applicable OMB Circulars. The applicants 
selected under this SGA will be subject to the following administrative 
standards and provisions, if applicable:
    <bullet> Workforce Investment Act--20 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR) Part 667 (General Fiscal and Administrative Rules).
    <bullet> The Workforce Investment Act of 1998, U.S.C. 2801 et seq.
    <bullet> Workforce Investment Act Regulations codified at (20 CFR 
pts. 660-671).
    <bullet> OMB Circulars, A-122 Cost Principles, A-21 Cost 
Principles, A-87 Cost Principles, 48 CFR part 31 Cost Principles.
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 2, Subpart D--Equal Treatment in Department of 
Labor Programs for Religious Organizations, Protection of Religious 
Liberty of Department of Labor Social Service Providers and 
Beneficiaries;
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 31--Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted 
Programs of the Department of Labor--Effectuation of Title VI of the 
Civil Rights Act of 1964;
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 32--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap 
in Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal 
Financial Assistance;
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 35--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in 
Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance from the 
Department of Labor;
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 36--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in 
Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial 
Assistance;
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 37--Implementation of the Nondiscrimination 
and Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Workforce Investment Act of 
1998 (WIA).
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 93--Lobbying;
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 95--Grants and Agreements with Non-Profit 
Organizations, Commercial Organizations, International Organizations, 
Foreign Governments, and Others;
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 96--Audit Requirements for Grants, Contracts 
and Other Agreements;
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 97--Uniform Administrative Requirements for 
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments;
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 98--Government-wide Debarment and Suspension 
(Non-Procurement) and Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free 
Workplace; and
    <bullet> 29 CFR part 99--Audits of States, Local Governments, and 
Non-Profit Organizations.

    Note: Except as specifically provided in this notice, ETA's 
acceptance of a proposal and award of Federal funds to sponsor any 
programs(s) does not provide a waiver of any grant requirements and/
or procedures. For example, the OMB Circulars require that an 
entity's procurement procedures must ensure that all procurement 
transactions are conducted, as much as practical, to provide full 
and open competition. If a proposal identifies a specific entity to 
provide services, ETA's award does not provide the justifications or 
basis to sole-source the procurement, i.e., avoid competition, 
unless the activity is regarded as the primary work of an official 
partner to the application.

3. Reporting Requirements

    Successful applicants will be required to submit performance 
information as well as Quarterly Financial Reports and Quarterly 
Progress Reports.
    Quarterly Financial Reports. A Quarterly Financial Status Report 
(SF 269) is required until such time as all funds have been expended or 
the grant period has expired. Quarterly financial reports are due 
thirty days after the end of each calendar year quarter. Grantees must 
use ETA's On-Line Electronic Reporting System.
    Quarterly Progress Reports. The grantee must submit a quarterly 
progress report to the designated Federal Project Officer within thirty 
days after the end of each calendar year quarter. Two copies are to be 
submitted providing a detailed account of activities undertaken during 
that quarter. The Department may require additional data elements to be 
collected and reported on either a regular basis or special request 
basis. Grantees must agree to meet the Department's reporting 
requirements.
    The quarterly progress report should be in narrative form and must 
include:
    1. In-depth information on accomplishments, including number of 
clients served, which services were

[[Page 19039]]

provided, referrals made, recidivism statistics, project success 
stories, upcoming grant activities, promising approaches and processes, 
and progress in achieving performance outcomes;
    2. Challenges, barriers, or concerns regarding project progress;
    3. Lessons learned in the areas of project administration and 
management, successful referral structures, project implementation, 
partnership relationships and other related areas.
    MIS Data. Grantees will be required to submit updated MIS data on 
enrollment, services provided, placements, outcomes, and follow-up 
status. DOL will coordinate with sites after grant award to implement 
an MIS system for this project.

Part VII. Agency Contacts

    Any technical questions regarding this SGA should be faxed to 
Melissa Abdullah, Grants Management Specialist, Division of Federal 
Assistance, at (202) 693-2705. This is not a toll-free number. You must 
specifically address your fax to the attention of Melissa Abdullah and 
should include SGA/DFA PY 06-14, a contact name, fax, and telephone 
number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Melissa Abdullah, 
Grants Management Specialist, Division of Federal Assistance, on (202) 
693-3346. This is not a toll-free number.
    This announcement is also being made available on the ETA Web site 
at http://www.doleta.gov/sga/sga.cfm and http://www.grants.gov.

Part VIII. Other Information

    OMB Information Collection No. 1205-0458.
    Expires September 30, 2009.
    According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are 
required to respond to a collection of information unless such 
collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden 
for this collection of information is estimated to average 20 hours per 
response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing 
data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing 
and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding 
the burden estimated or any other aspect of this collection of 
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the 
U.S. Department of Labor, the OMB Desk Officer for ETA, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT 
RETURN YOUR COMPLETED APPLICATION TO THE OMB. SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS 
PROVIDED IN PART IV OF THIS SOLICITATION.
    This information is being collected for the purpose of awarding a 
grant. The information collected through this ``Solicitation for Grant 
Applications'' will be used by the Department of Labor to ensure that 
grants are awarded to the applicant best suited to perform the 
functions of the grant. Submission of this information is required in 
order for the applicant to be considered for award of this grant. 
Unless otherwise specifically noted in this announcement, information 
submitted in the respondent's application is not considered to be 
confidential.

Resources for the Applicant

    DOL maintains a number of web-based resources that may be of 
assistance to applicants. The webpage for the DOL Center for Faith-
Based and Community Initiatives (http://www.dol.gov/CFBCI) is a 
valuable source of background on the President's Initiative at the 
Department of Labor. It also contains valuable information on prisoner 
reentry. America's Service Locator (http://www.servicelocator.org) 
provides a directory of our nation's One-Stop Career Centers. 
Applicants are encouraged to review ``Understanding the Department of 
Labor Solicitation for Grant Applications and How to Write an Effective 
Proposal'' (http://www/dol.gov/cfbci/sgabrochure.htm).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of April, 2007.
Eric D. Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer, Employment and Training Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-7151 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P