RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN 

### DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY LANSING



### February 14, 2014 Dr. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 77 West Jackson Boulevard (R-19J) Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507 Dear Dr. Hedman: DAN WYANT OJRECTOR



### SUBJECT: Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal of Revisions to Part 4 Rules Pursuant to Section 110 ofthe federal Clean Air Act and the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) is submitting the promulgated revisions to "Part 4. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions - Sulfur-Bearing Compounds" rules for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) review and approval for inclusion in the Michigan SIP. The MDEQ is also requesting that certain portions ofthe Wayne County Ordinance, as amended, be removed from the SIP as they are being replaced by the amended Part 4 rules. Michigan Air Pollution Control Rules modified and/or added are: R 336.1401, Emission ofsulfur dioxide from power plants; R 336.1401a, Definitions; R 336.1402, Emission ofsulfur dioxide from fuel-burning equipment at a stationary source other than power plants; R 336.1404, Emission ofsulfur dioxide and sulfuric acid mist from sulfuric acid plants; R 336.1405, Emissions from sulfur recovery plants located within Wayne county; R 336.1406, Hydrogen sulfide emissions from facilities located within Wayne county; R 336.1407, Sulfur compound emissions from sources located within Wayne county and not previously specified; and R 336.1420, Applicability determinations, definitions, and permitting requirements under CAIR [Clean Air Interstate Rule] sulfur dioxide trading program. The revisions to the Michigan Air Pollution Control Rules were adopted to incorporate the Wayne County Department of Public Health, Air Quality Management Division (WCAQMD) Ordinance for sulfur dioxide (S02) regulations. The 1969 Ordinance was amended in 1981; both the Ordinance and the amendment are part of Michigan's approved SIP. In 2001 Wayne County closed the WCAQMD and ended its air pollution control program. The MDEQ modified the Part 4 rules in 2008 and 2013 to provide equivalent protections in state rules to the amended Wayne County S02 regulations. As such, the MDEQ requests the removal ofthe Wayne County Air Pollution Control Regulations (1969), Section 6.3 A-H, as amended in 1981, from the Michigan SIP. CONSTITUTION HALL • 525 WESTALLEGAN STREET • P.O. BOX 30473 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909·7973 WNW.mlchlgan.gov/deq • (800) 662-9278

### Dr. Susan Hedman Page 2 February 14, 2014 Additionally, R 336.1420, which provides for opting into the federal CAIR program, is included in the set of rules for submittal to the SIP. An opportunity for public comment and hearing was provided both for the promulgation of these rule revisions and for their submittal for approval to the Michigan SIP. In addition, an opportunity for public comment and hearing on the removal ofthe amended Wayne County regulation from the SIP was also provided. This submittal consists ofone hard copy ofthe required documentation. An electronic version ofthe submittal in PDF format, identical to the hard copy, has been sent to Mr. Charles Hatten at the USEPA, Region 5. To assist with your review of the SIP submission, a list of the supporting documents is enclosed. We ask that the USEPA approve these revisions to the Michigan SIP. Questions on this submittal may be directed to Ms. Mary Maupin, SIP Unit Supervisor, Air Quality Division, at 517-284-6755; maupinm@michigan.gov; or MDEQ, P.O. Box 30260, Lansing, Michigan 48909-7760; or you may contact me.

Enclosure incer'?

# j t:>**~** v " 

# f

# lfrn,uJ Dan Wyant 

# C Director 517-284-6700 cc/enc: Mr. Charles Hatten, USEPA, Region 5 Mr. Jim Sygo, Deputy Director, MDEQ Mr. G. Vinson Hellwig, MDEQ Ms. Mary Maupin, MDEQ Mr. Tracey McDonald, MDEQ

### Dan Wyant Director 

# REVISION TO STATE OFMICHIGAN STATE IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN for Part 4. EMISSIONLIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS- SULFUR-BEARING COMPOUNDS R 336.1401 toR336.1402, R 336.1404- R 336.1407, R 336.1420, and removal ofWayne CountyAirPollution Control Regulations, Section 

# 6.3 A-H, as amended in 1981 February 14, 2014 Prepared

### by: Michigan DepartmentofEnvironmental Quality AirQualityDivision



### P.

### 0. Box 30260 Lansing, Ml 48909-7760 INTERNET: http://www.michigan.gov/deqair

### TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPLETENESS REVIEW 

### COMPLETENESS REVIEW CHECKLIST........................................................ 1 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A 

### A.1. 2011-029 EQ, Final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective March 11, 2013. A.2. 2005-036 EQ, Previous final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective January 31, 2008. ATTACHMENT 8 

### 8.1. 2011-029 EQ, Secretary ofState's notice offiling Administrative Rules, dated March 11, 2013. 8.2. 2005-036 EQ, Secretary of State's notice offiling Administrative Rules, dated January 31, 2008. ATTACHMENT 

### C C.1. 2011-029 EQ, Agency Report to JCAR, dated November 5, 2012. C.2. 2005-036 EQ, Agency Report to JCAR, dated October 15, 2007. ATTACHMENT D 

### 0.1. 2011-029 EQ, Opening Statement, dated November 1, 2012. 0.2. 2011-029 EQ, Staff Report, dated October 30,2012. 0.3. 2005-036 EQ, Opening Statement, dated July 19, 2007. 0.4. 2005-036 EQ, Staff Statement, dated July 19, 2007. ATTACHMENT E 

### E.1. 2011-029 EQ, Notice of Public Hearing, dated November 1, 2012. E.2. 2011-029 EQ, Newspaper Publication Affidavits, dated October 1 and 2, 2012, and October 9, 2012, and Newspaper Publication Tear Sheets, dated September 30, 2012, and October 1, 2012.

### E.3. 2005-036 EQ, Notice of Public Hearing, dated July 19, 2007. E.4. 2005-036 EQ, Comments, dated July 18 and 19, 2007. E.5. 2005-036 EQ, Newspaper Affidavits, dated June 11, 2007, and July 6, 2007. E.6. Notices of Public Comment and Hearing appearing in the December 2, 2013, issue ofthe DEQ Environmental Calendar, regarding removal ofWayne County Ordinance and Variance from SIP. ATTACHMENT F 

### F.1. 2011-029 EQ, Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approval. F.2. 2005-036 EQ, Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approval. F.3. Combined Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approval. ATTACHMENT 

### G G.1. Wayne County Air Pollution Control Regulation, Article VI excerpt. G.2. Wayne County Variance- Minutes from 7/29/81 Board of Health meeting. G.3. Wayne County Air Pollution Control Ordinance 1985, Chapter 8 excerpt.

### COMPLETENESS REVIEW Administrative Materials 1. A formal letter of submittal from the governor or designee requesting USEPA approval of the revision. Cover letter dated February 14, 2014, from Dan Wyant, Director of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), to Dr. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Region 5, requesting approval of State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. A letter dated March 24, 2011, from Governor Rick Snyder to USEPA, Region 5, delegating authority to the MDEQ Director to make any submittal, request, or application under the federal Clean Air Act. The letter is available upon request. 2. Evidence that the state has adopted the revision In the state code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent agreement (hereafter document) In final form. That evidence should include the date ofadoption orfinal Issuance as well as the effective date ofthe revision Ifdifferentfrom the adoption/issuance date. The Secretary of State's Notices of Filing Administrative Rules for Part 4, dated March 11, 2013, and January 31, 2008, are included in Attachment B. 3. Evidence that the state has the necessary legal authority under state law to adopt and implementthe revision. Section 5512 of Part 55, Air Pollution Control, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended, gives the agency the authority to promulgate the revised rules. A copy is available upon request or at the Web site listed below. http://leqislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-324-5512 4. A copy of the actual regulation or document submitted for approval and Incorporation by reference Into the SIP, Including Indication ofthe changes made to the existing approved SIP, where applicable. The submittal should be a copy of the official state regulation/document signed, stamped, and dated by the appropriate state official Indicating that It Is fully enforceable by the state. The effective date of the regulation/document should, whenever possible, be indicated in the document Itself. The Secretary of State's Notice of Filing Administrative Rules for Part 4, dated March 11, 2013, and January 31, 2008, are included in Attachment B. The final form of the adopted rules, Part 4, with the effective date of March 11, 2013, as well as the revisions to the Part 4 rules effective January 31, 2008, are included in Attachment

### A Three strikethrough bold versions are included in Attachment F. Two are the rule changes as submitted for approval; the third was created for this submittal to show all changes from the previously approved Part 4 SIP in one document. Regarding the provisions we are requesting be deleted from the SIP, a copy of the 1969 Wayne County Air Pollution Control Regulation -Article VI, Section 6.3 A-H, and the 1981 variance amending this regulation are included in Attachment G.

### 5. Evidence that the state followed all of the requirements of its administrative procedures act (or equivalent) in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the revision. The Secretary of State's Notice of Filing Administrative Rules for Part 4, dated March 11, 2013, and January 31,2008, are included in Attachment B. In addition, multiple steps in our rule making process are documented. The following are available upon request:

• A Certification of Adoption and letter from MDEQ Director Dan Wyant to the Office of Regulatory Reinvention (ORR) dated February 26, 2013, regarding the most recent rule change. • The Legislative Service Bureau's (LSB) Certificate ofApproval dated January 22, 2013, as well as a letter and certification of legality from ORR to the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR) dated February 4, 2013. • A Certification of Adoption and letter from former MDEQ Director Steven Chester to the State Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules (SOAHR) dated December 10, 2007, regarding the first revision of the rules. • The LSB Certificate of Approval dated November 26, 2007, Certification of Legality dated November 30, 2007, and a letter from SOAHR to JCAR dated December 3, 2007, all pertaining to the earlier revision ofthe rules. 6. Evidence that public notice was given ofthe proposed change consistent with procedures approved by USEPA, Including date of publication of such notice. Publication from 3 different newspapers that published the notice of public hearing on September 30, 2012, and October 1, 2012, (affidavits dated October 1, October 2, and October 9, 2012) for the final revisions to the rule and on June 11, 2007 (affidavits dated on June 12 and July 6, 2007) for the previous revisions to the rules are included in Attachment E. A public notice and a tentative public hearing were posted in the December 2, 2013, MDEQ Environmental Calendar, on the matter of removal of the pertinent Wayne County regulations from the SIP. An excerpt from the calendar is available in Attachment E or the complete calendar is at the link below: htlp://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/deq-oea-envcatendar-120213 441289 7.pdf?20140110103719 

### 7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the Information provided In the public notice and the state's administrative procedures act (or equivalent), If applicable. The Opening Statements for the November 1, 2012, and July 19, 2007, public hearings include information on the notice of public hearing and instructions on how the hearing was to be conducted. The staff

### reports are also included with the opening statements in Attachment D. As indicated above, a tentative public hearing regarding removal of the pertinent Wayne County regulations from Michigan's SIP was scheduled, but was not requested.

### 8. Compilation of public comments and state's response thereto. No comments were received regarding the 2013 rule revisions or regarding the removal of the Wayne County regulations from the SIP. Copies of the comments received concerning the 2008 revisions to the rules are in Attachment E with the responses contained in the Agency Report to JCAR in Attachment C. 

### Technical Support 1. Justification of rules revisions. The "Purpose for the Proposed Rules and Background," Section 2, and "Summary of Proposed Rules," Section 3, ofthe November 5, 2012, and October 15, 2007, Agency Reports in Attachment C provide the purpose and justification ofthe proposed rules revisions. Section 110 ofthe Clean AirAct requires that SIP revisions cannot be a relaxation of rules that have already been approved to Michigan's SIP. The modifications must be equally protective or more stringent than rules previously reviewed and approved by USEPA. Many conversations and much correspondence were had between AQD and USEPA over several months concerning this issue. Following are three examples and brief discussions ofthese interactions that illustrate how these changes are equally or more stringent. The USEPA expressed a concern that used oil was added to Tables 42 and 43 where itwas not previously allowed. Used oil limitations expressed as weight percent ofsulfur are set equal to those ofthe other oils in the table, and the sulfur concentration limits are more stringent in the MDEQ rules than in the approved SIP. This combined with testing standards and requirements included in footnotes to the tables would make the current MDEQ limits for sulfur in used oil more stringent than sulfur limits for crude and heavy oils in the current SIP. Another concern regarding the comparative stringency of rules was that the sulfur content values for some ofthe fuels were given limits greater than Wayne County's SlP-approved regulations appear to have allowed. The original Wayne County Ordinance (1969) (Attachment G) required sulfur content for mostfuels to decrease over a four-year period. The current MDEQ rules allow values higher than what Wayne County would have allowed had that regulation stayed in effect. However, in 1981 Wayne County adopted a variance/addendum (meeting minutes from 7/29/1981) which adjusted some ofthose limits upward (Attachment G). The USEPA approved this variance (refer to 40 CFR Subpart X, 52.1170(c), Local Regulations). The MDEQ rules reflect those SIP-approved adjustments. A third concern was the apparent relaxation of SIP-approved Wayne County regulations for residential and commercial space and water heating. The limits in the MDEQ rules take into account that Wayne County has prohibited the burning ofcoal in residential, commercial, and school buildings for space or water heating. This ordinance, Wayne CountyAir Pollution Control 1985 Ordinance, Section 805 (Attachment G), is also included in the SIP. For this reason, limits for residential and commercial coal burning were not included in the Part 4 changes. These Part 4 revisions incorporate the Wayne County regulations, as amended by variance, which are currently approved in the SIP. The Part 4 rules are no less stringent than Wayne County sulfur dioxide-related regulations and, in fact, include definitions, sampling, sampling methods, and recordkeeping requirements not previously in the SIP.

## I 

# I I 

# I I 

# I

I 

# I I 

# I I 

# I

I 

# I I 

# I I 

# I I 

# I

### A.1. 2011-029 EQ, Final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective March 11, 2013. A.2. 2005-036 EQ, Previous final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective January 31,2008.

### A.1. 2011-029 EQ, Final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective March 11, 2013.

MICHIGANDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITYDIVISION PART4. EMISSION LllvflTATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS-SULFuRBEARING CO)vfPOUNDS (By authority confened on the director ofenvironmental quality by sections 5503 and 5512 of 1994 PA 451,

**~vfCL** 324.5503 and 324.5512, and Executi\·e Reorganization OrderNurubm 1995-16, MCL 324.99903, 2009-31, )vlCL 324.99919 and 2011-1,

**~ICL** 324.99921)

PART 4. HHSSIONLIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS- SULFUR-BEARING C01-!POUNDS R 336.1401 Euii%ionofsulfurdioxide fioru j>o\\·erplants. Rule 401. (I) lu a power plant, it is unlawful for a person to bum fuel that does not comply with_the sulfur content limitation oftable 41 or which, when burned, results in sulfur dio:-tide (S02) emissions exceeding an equivalent emission rate as shown in table 41. [n apowerplant located inWayne county, it is unlawful for-a person to bumfuel that does not comply with the sulfur content limitation of !able 42 and ulllawfnl to cause or pern.tit a

**di~charge** into the atmosphere from fuel-burning eg,uipruent 

### so2 in excess ofthe 

### so2 concentrationlimit shownintable 42.

(2) Tables 41 nnd 42 read as follows: TABLE41 Fueland S01 Emis•ionLimitations forPowerPlants , 1via.x.imum Equivalent EU'Iission Rates Plnnt Capacit;.·(1) A\•erage Parts per1\·fi.llionbyVolume Pounds ofSOJper Sulfur (ppmv) Corrected to

**50~~** 1\.fillionBtu ofHeal Inpnt Content in Excess A_Ufe) (•) Fuel(o, t) SolidFu.eltcJ liquidFuel''' Solid Liquid (Percent (12,000 (18.000 Fuel(c) Fuel(:l) by Bn•·1b) Btu•lb) (12,000 (18.000 Weight) Bn••lb) Btu,1b) 0-500,000 lb; Steom 1.5 890 630 1.5 1.67 perHourPlant Capacity Greater than 500,000 

### l.O 590 420 1.67 l.ll lbs SteamperHour Plant Capacity (a) The total steamproductioncapacityofall coal- andoil-burning equipment in a powerplant as ofAui(Ust 17, 1971.

### A.1. 2011-029 EQ, Final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective March 11, 2013.

(b) "Maximum average sulfurcontent in fu-el" means the aYerage .sulfurcontentin all fuels bmned at nny 1time in apowerplant. The sulfurcontent5ha.ll be calculated on the**bas-i~** of 12,000 Bruperponndfor solid fuels and 18,000 Btu oeroound for lionid fbek I(c) Solid fuels include bothpulverized coaland aU othercoal (d) Liquid fuels include distillate oil (No. 1and No.2), heavy oil (No.4, No.5, andNo.6), and cn1de oiL (e)A personshall sample,analyze, calculate, andrecord for ench dayofopemtion foreachunit at the powerplant, the sulfurcontent ofthe fuel combmted orthe fuel's eq_uiva1ent S01emission rate inaccordance withas-fired fuel**~ampling** and analysis procedures found in appendi.x A of 40 CFR. pillt 60; inparticular the "StandardTest }..fethods fo.r Sulfur inPetroleum Products:" ASTI-.·1 DJ29-01, 01266-98, orD1552-01 andthe "Standard Test }..fethods forTotal Sulfur in the Analy!.k. ofCoal and Coke:"ASTM03177-89 or04239-02; a.s referenc-ed in 40 C.F.R. part 60.17, adoptedbyreferenc-e inR 336.1SOla. Records**~hall** be l:ept, including the identification ofthepowerplant, days ofoperation, and maximum sulftu content offuel combmted for eac-h dayofoperation. Records shallbelll.3.intained on site for 5years and submitted to the depilltruent uponwritten**reque~f.** 'CABLE 42

Fuel and S01 ConcentrationLimitation" for PowerPlants Located in Wayne County h·faxir:uum Weighf Percent Sulfu.r Contentin**Fuel(~!.:**b) SOlppuw EmissionRates Corrected to 50%**Exce~s**Air(o) Fuel Type. Limitations forFuel-Bumiug Equipment Pulverized Coal 1.00 550 OtherCoal 0.75 420
. Distillate OilNos. 1& 2 0.30 120 Used Oil 1.00 300 Cmde andHeavy Oil 1.00 400 Nc5. 4, 5, & 6 (a) "Maxinmm weight percent sulfurcontent in fuel" rueans the ma.x.imum weightpercent sulfurc-ontent in all fuels burned at any 1time in apowerplant. (b)A person shall sample, analyze, calculate, and record foreach dayofoperation for each unit at thepo\verplant, the sullhrcontentofthe fuel combusted and the fuel's equivalent S02 emissionrate in accordauc-:e with as-fued fuel sampling nnd analysisprocedures found in appendixA of40 CFRpart 60; inpa11icularthe "StandardTest Method!'> for Sulfurin Petroleum Products:"ASTl-.-i 0129-01,01266-98, orDl552-01 and the "Standard Test Methods for Total Sulfurin the Analysis ofCoal and Coke:"ASTM D3177-89**o:rD4239~02; a~**  referenced in 40 C.F.R. part 60.17, adopted byreference inR 336.1802a. Records**~hall** be l::ept, including the identification ofthe powerplant, days ofoperation, and ma.ximum sulfur content offuel combustedforeach day ofoperation. Records shallbe maiptajped on site for 5 years and submittedtothe depi111ment upon writtenrequest.

(3) The following provisions applyto personsinWayne county: (a) The maximum weight percent s-ulfur content in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisions oftable 42 -of this rule shall not apply to any person who mes a combination offuels in suchratios**a~** to meet the S01 concentration liruitntions s-pecified

### A.1. 2011-029 EQ, Final form of adopted _rules, Part 4, effective March 11, 2013.

in table 42 and**ha~** obtained written approval from the department for this exemption. The allowable concentration limit will be based on the value in the table for the fuel haYing the h.igher allowable concezl!mtionlimil.

(b) The maximum weight percent sulft1r content iu fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisiom. of table 42 of this rule shall not apply to anj• person who bas received au i..ustallation pemllt from the department on a control de•·ice to desulfurize the stack gases and the control device is installed and operatingproperly.

(4) Instead ofconducting daily as-fired fuel s:uupling and analysis pursuant to mb1ule (2) of this 111le, a person at any power plant equipped with a S02 continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) 1ll11)' compute and record the daily equi,·atent enlission rates as detennined by the S01 CEMS. The S01 CE)..fS shall be calibrated, maint11iued, nnd operated in accordance with the proc-edure.s in 40 CFR 60.13(d), (e), (f), and (h) and in perfomiance specification 2, appendi.x B of40 CFR parl 60 or 40 CFR pru1 75 excl11ding the data sub!>titution outlined in !.Ubp:ut D, adopted by reference in R 336.1802a. Record.s shall be maintained on !.ite for 5 year..s and 5Ubmitted to the department upon writtenrequest. History: 1980 A.i\CS; 2002 AAf;S; 2008 AAGS; 2013**~!R** 6, Eff \fa.-ch 11,2013. R 336.140la Definitions.

Rule 401a. As used in thisprut: (a) 11Power plant" means a single ::rtmcture devoted to steillll or electric generation, or both, and may containmultiple boiler:..

(b) "SulfurrecontJplant" means anyplant that reco\·ers elemental sulfur from any gas .stream. (c) "U!ied oil" mean'> any fitel that is produced from used oil, as defined in R 299.9109(p). Histof}" 2008 AACS; 2013 h!R 6, Eff 1!ru-ch 11, 2013. R 336.1402 Emission of S02 from fuet.buming equipment at a stationary source other thanpowerplants. Rule 402. (1)Forfuel burning e<}llipment at a rtationa.ry source otherth3.11 a powerplant it is unlawful for a person to cause or allow the emission ofS01 from the combu.stion of any coal or oil fuel in exce . .ss of I.7 pounds permillion Btu ofheat input for oil fuel orin exces.s of2.4 pounds permillion Btuofheat input for coaJ fuel.

(2) Theprovi.sions ofsubrole(1) ofthis mle donotapply to fuel.burning equipment at a**~tationary** source that is unable to comply with the !.pecified emission limits beca\1Se. of S02 emissions causedby the pre!ience of:rulfurin otherraw materials charged to the fuelburning equipment. This exception shall applyifatanytiu1e the actual S01 emissionr3te exceeds the expected theoretical S01 emission rate from**ft~-el** 1.mrning. The expected theoretical 

### sol eJJ.lission rate shall be based ou the quantity of fiJel burned and the a\·erage sulfurcontent ofthe fuel.

### A 1.**2q~** 

### 1-029 EQ, Final form of adopted rules, Part 4, effective March 11, 2013.

(3) For fuel burning equipment at a stationaty source located in Wayne county other than a power plant, it is unlawful for a person to bum fuel that does not complywith the sulfur content limitation oftable 43 and unlawf\ll to cause or allow a**di~charge** into the atmosphere. from fuel burning equipment SO.:! in excess ofthe S02 concentration limit shownin table 43.

(4)Table 43 reads as follows: Table 43 Fuel and S01 ConcentrationLimitations for FuelBurning Equipment(<) at a Stationary S L d. \V C 0 h ha P Pl

O\lrce ocate ill arne ountr I ert ua ower ant Fuel Type MaximumWeie:ht Percent**SO~** ppm\· Emission Rates SulfurContent

## in Fnet<Lb) Corrected to 50% Excess Limitations forFuel. Airb BurningEquipment Coal 0.75 420 Distillate OilNos. 1&2 0.30 120 Used Oil 1.0 300 Cmde and Hea\")' Oil 1.00 400 Nos. 4, 5, & 6 (a) The detennin,ation ofsulfur**cp~t~J.).f** (percentbyweight) of:fuel shallbe carried out inaccordance with-the '"'Standard Test 1-,:fethods for Sulfur inPetroleum Products:"ASTM**D129~01,** DI266.980orDI552-01 and the "Standard Te:.t Methods for TotalSulfurintheAnalysisofCoal andCol:e:"ASTM03177-89 of D4239-02; as referencedin40C.F.R pad 60.17 adopted byreference iuR 336.IS02a. (b) Records shall be hpt,induding the identificationofthefuel burningequipment, days of**op~tion,** andmarim\IW5Ulfur- contentoffue1combusted for each day of operation. Records shall be maintained on site for 5y.::ars and submitted to the department upon \'>'"riften request. (c) Fortable 43, fuel burning eqllipmenf include;; residential and co1111llerc.ia1space andwaterheating. The ma.'>.imum weightpercent .mlfurcontentin fuel and S02 ppmv emissionrate limitations for distillate, cn1de, and hea\')' oils listed above also apply to these uuit... (5) The following pro\'isionsapplyto penominWayne county: (a) The maximum weight percent .sul.fur content in fuel limitations for fue-l-b11ruing equipment provisions of table 43 of this mle !.ball not apply to a person who uses a combination offuels in suchrotios. as to meet the S02 concentration l.imitatious .specified in table 43 and bas obtained written approval from the department for this exemption. The altowable concentration limit will be based on tillo value in the table for the fuel ha\·ing the higherallowable concentration limit.

(b) The maximum weight percent sulfur content in fuel limitations for**fuel~buming** equipmentprovisions oftable43 ofthis rule shaH not apply to a person who has receh•ed an installation permit from the**depa.~inlent** for a control device to desulfurize the stack gases aud the control device is installed and operating properly.

### A.1. 2011-029 EQ, Final form of adopted rules, Part 4, effective March 11, 2013.

Hiotory: 19SO A1tCS; 200S AACS; 2013 MR6, Eft: Morch 11, 2013.
R 336.1403 Oil- and natuml gas-producing or transpot1ing facilities and nahJral gon**proce~sing** facilities; emissions; operation.

Rule 403. (1) Except as proYided in submle (3) of

**thi~** nde, it is unlawful for a person to cause or allow the emission of!'.Ourgas from an oil- or natural gas-prodndng or transpo11ing facility or a natural

**ga~-** processing facility without burning or equivalent control of hydrogen

**~ulfide** and mercaptaus.

(2) Except as provided in submle- (3) of this mle, sour gas that is bumedat an oil- or nahJral ga'>-produc-ing ortrru.uporting facility or at a natural gas-processing facility .shall be burned ill a propecly engineered flare, incinerator, O'f other combustion S)'5fem with elevated discharge to the atmosphere. If the. ilare, incioemtor, or other combustion system bums sour gas in such volume and with such hydrogen sulfide- concentration that the daily quantity ofhydrog_en sulfide. in the gas is less_ than 28 pounds, then it shall be equipped with either a pilot flame which will bum confiuuomly when gas flow.s to the flare, incinerator, or other combustion iystem.-or. with an nutofUiitic ignition sy!.tem, mlle!>s othen>:i-se :mthoi--ized by the department. If the flru:-e, incinerator, or other combustion system buffi!l !.our ga:. in such \"olurue and with such hydrogen s.ulfide concentration that the. daily quantity ofhydrogen sulfide in the gasis 28 pounds or more, then it shall be equipped with a continuously burning pilot flame and a mechanism which will operate, uponfailure of·the pilot flame, to shut offthe .flow of gas, unless otbetwise authorized by the department.

(3) The provisions ofsubn.1les (1) an4 (2) ofthis nde do not apply to either ofthe following:

(a) CnJde oil.produdng facilities that sen•e a well or group of welts which attained an ave.rage production level of 10 or less barrels per day pee well before January 1, 1978, unless the department has received 1complaint ofodors regarding the facility, and the owner or operator is unable to or fails to demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the department,. that the uncontrolledhydrogen sulfide and mercaptan emissions do not cause an odornuisance orhealth hazard.

(b) A vessel or a battery ofvessels that releases a total daily volume ofvapors

**ofle~s** than 5,000 standard cubic feet, jf the owner oroperator demonstrates both ofthe following:

(i)

**Co~bmtion** ofthe nponisnoteconomically

**rea~onable.** (ii) Theuncontrolledrelease ofthe \'aporswill not cause a violalionofthe provisions ofR 336.1901.

(4) A person shall not cause or allow the emission of sulfur dioxide from a new s:weetenin_g facility, unless such

**emi~siom** are controlled using the-

**be~t** available controllechnology: ····

(5) The operatorofa sour gas-, cntde., or condens..'\te.sweetening facili·ty shall do all ofthe following:

(a) Monitor the mass flow rate of hydrogen sulfide either entering the plant or going to the waste gM flMe or flares on a periodic schedule specified by the depa11ruent. The monitoring program shall include a det<"r·miuation of the

### A.1. 2011-029 EQ, Final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective March 11, 2013.

hydrogen sulfide concentration using colorimetric detector h1be-s or their eCJ.uivalenl and a detennina.tion of the volumetric gas flow mte. The monitoring data

**~ball** be submitted to the department in an acceptable f01m;1t within 30daysfollowing the end of the monthin which lhe data werecollected.

(b) Pmvide fencing, waming

**!.ign~.** orothermeasure-s as necessary to warn or deter unauthorized individuals from entering the plant property orbuildings. Sigm shall read: "Danger--Poison Gas," ·with at least 1 sign on each side of the plant property.

(c) Provide control ofmalodorous eruhsions from any valves, storage tanks, and dehydr.Hor vent or vents control. pressure relief valve or by bumiug or equivalent (d) Conduct a program of continuous monitoring of concentmtious ofhydrogen sulfide in anybuilding eudosiug a

**~weete:uing** process. The senr>or shall be placed as dose to process equipment as practicable. The system shall be

**de~igued,** installed, and wainlaiued to provide a visual alarm when the hydrogen sulfide concentration is wore than 50ppnL

(e) Automatically begin a safe and orderly, shutdown of all proceas inflow

**~treams** to the facility ifthe concentration of hydrogen sulfide is more than 100 ppm in any building enclosing a sweetening process. Full operation may be re51lme.1 only after successful correctivemeasureshave be:en applied.

(f) Automatically colllnleuce

**(;hut~in** of the facility within second after extinguishment of the flare flame, unless otherwise

**;~uthorized** by the dep:u1wenl. Operation ofthe facility shaltnot continue unless correc!h•e measures tal:eo to reignite the flame are .succe5sful.

(6) A new sweetening f..1.ci1ity shall not be iusmlled at or· distance ofless than 1;300 feet fi·oru an existing resiQence, unle-ss othem•ise authorized by the departmeut. Such authorization shall depend upon a satll.factory showing by a permit applicant that au odornuisance

**~hall** not re51llt from a

**les~er** setbackdistance. Hislo')c 1980AACS; 1989 .'\.ACS; 2002 AACS. R 336.1404 Emission ofS01 and sulfuric acid m.ist from sulfuric acidplants. Rtlle 404. (1) It is unlawful for a per:;on to came or allow the emission ofsulfuric acid mist from any sulfuric acid plant in excess of0.50 po1mds per ton ofacid produc-ed, the productionbeing expressedas 100%sulfuric add.

(2) Itis unlawful for a person inWayne county to cause or allow S01enli!,.sions into the atmosphere from anysulfuric acidplant to exceed 6.5poundsper- ton ofacidproduced.

(3) Compliancewith thismle shall be demonstrated using 40 C.F.Rpa11 60,

**ap~ndix** A, reference test method no. 8, adopted byreference in R 336.2004(1)(1).

His!01)": 1980 AACS; 2008 AACS; 2013 MR6, Eff. March 11,2013. R 336.1405 Emissions :from sulfurreco\'el}'plants located within Wayue county.

### A.1. 2011-029 EQ, Final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, efl'.ective March 11, 2013.

Rule 405. At sulfurrecoveryplants located in \Vayne connt)•, aperson shall not c:mse or allo\v the eotission into the atmo5phere of sulfur dioxide, !.-ulfur trioxide, or sulfuric acid from any such sulfur recoveryplant to exceed 0.01 pounds perpound of sulfurproduced. Hiotory. 2008 AACS. R 336.1406 Hydrogen sulfide e.ruissiom from facilities located withiu Wayne county.

Rule 406. (1) Aperson inWayne county shall not cause or allow the combustion ofanyrefineryprocess gas stream that contains hydrogen sulfide ill a concentration of greaterthan 100 grains per 100 cubic- feet of g11s without rernovill of the hydrogen sulfide in excess of this concentration..

(2) \\1hen the odorof hydrogen sulfide is found to exist beyond the property line of a source, a person in Wayne county shall not came or allow the concentration of hydrogen sulfide to exceed 0.005 p:uis per million by volume for a maximum period of2 minutes. Histoly: 2008 AACS:
R 336.1407. Sulfur compound erui.'.i:;-ions from sources located within Wayne county and not previously !>pecified.

Rule -107. Both ·of the following apply to process and fuel burning equipment at a

**~tationnry** source located within Wayne county to which the provi.Gions ofR 336.1401 to R 336.1406 donot apply.

(a) A person shall not came or allow the emission into the atmosphere gases with a concentration of S02 greater than 300 parts pe.r million b:y' volume, which shaiJ be corrected to 50% excess air.

(b) A person shall not cause or allow the em.i..ssion into the atmosphere gases with a concentration ofsulfuric acid or !.-ulfur trioxide or a combination thereofgreater than 15 milligcams percubic rueter, which .sbaU be conected to 50% excess air.

Hi,tory. lOOS AACS; 2013 MR6,Eff.11arch 11, 2013. R 336.1420. Applicability determinntions, definitions, and permitting requirement!> underCAIR S02tradingprogram.

Rule 420. (1)As used in this n1le, ''CAIR'' means dean airintentate mle. (2) The pro\·isioll'> of40 C.F.R. §97.202, §97.220 to §97.224 and the opt-in

**pro\i~ioru** of 40 C.F.R. §97.2SO·to

**·g~I7-.2SS** '(:20'll)" are· adopled- by- rt:fereuce· iu this. nlle and·are• · applic-able to these rules. Copie!.' of 40 C.F.R. §97.202, §97.220 to §97.224, aud §97.280 to §97.288 are available for inspection and purchase at the Department ofEuviroll.lllental Quality, Air Quality Division, 525 West AUegau Street, P.O. Box 30260, Lansing, Michigan 48909-7760, at a cost ns ofthe time ofadoption of

**thi~** mle of$76.00. Copies ruay be aho obtained from the Superintendent ofDocuments, U.S. Go\•errunent Printing

### A.1. 2011-029 EQ, Final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective March 11, 2013.

Office, 732 N011h Capitol Street, N\V, \\'ashington, DC 20401, by calling 1-866-512- 1800orby accessing theironline bool:s1ore at http://booksto.re.gpo.gov at a co!<I as ofthe time- ofadoption oftllirule of $66.00. Tbe standards can be viewed and/or printed free ofcharge at

**http://ec-fr.gpoacce-~s.gov.**

(3) Each CAIR S01 source, as defmed in 40 C.F.R. §97.202 is required to apply for a CAIR permit in accordance with 40 C.F.R. §97.220 to §97224. This permit shall be adrn..in..istered in accordance with the procedural requirements ofR336.1214 and shall be incorporated into the facility's renewable operating permit as a.n attachment

History: 2008 AACS; 2013 MR 6, Ef£ March II, 2013.

### A.2. 2005-036 EQ, Previous final form.of adopted rules, Part 4, effective January 31,2008.

SOAHR**20D~J6EQ Eff~dve**  J:anl!ary3f, 21)1)8 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION AIR POLLUTION CONTROL Flied**v~tll** the Secretary ofstate on January 31, 2008 This rule becomes effective Immediately upon filing Witll the Secretary ofstate unless adopted undersections 33, 44, 45a(6), or48 of 1969 PA 306. Rules adopted undert11ese sections become effective 7 days afterfiling with the Secretary of State. (By authority conferred on tile directorofthe department of environmental quality by sections 5503 and 5512 or 1994 PA 451, 111CL 324.5503 and 324.5512, and Exectrtive Reorganization Order No. 1995-·18, MCL 324.99903)

R336.·1401, R335.1402, and R336.1404 ofthe Michigan Administrative Code are amended, end R336.140.1a, R036.1405, R336.1406, R336.1407, and R336:1420 ore added to t11e COde as follows: PART 4. EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONSSULFUR-BEARING COMPOUNDS R 336.1401 Emission ofsulfUr dioxide from power plants.

Rule 401. ('I) In a power plant. itis unlaWfUl for a person to bum fuel that does not comply with the sulfur content limitation oftable 4'lorwhich, when bumed, results In sulfur dioxide emissions exceeding an equivalent emission rate as shown in table 41. In apower plant located in Wayne county, it is unlawful for a person to bum fuel U1at does not comply Wlth

## me sulfUrcontent tihlitaticih

## oitaDre 42 ana · unla111u1 to cause or penni! adischarge Into the atmosphere from fuel-burning equipment sulfur dioxide in excess ofthe sulfurdioxide concentration limit shown in table 42.

(2) Tables 4 t and 42 read as follows: TABLE 41 Fuel and sulfur dioxide emission limitations for fuel buminQ equipment Maximum Equivalent emission rates average Parts per million by volume Pounds of sulfurdioxide Plant Capacityfa) sulfur (ppmv) corrected to 50% per million Btu of heat content In excess air input**ruer:~J** Solid fuer1· 1 liquid fuel 1 Solid fuel' 1 liquid Percent by (12,000 (18,000 (12,000 fuel\d)

weight Btullb) Btullb) Btullb) (18,000 Blullbl 0·500,000 lbs steam 1.5 890 630 2.5 1.67 per hour plant capaci1Y iOiU;2007·

### A2. 2005-036 EQ, Previous final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective January 31, 2008.

SOAHR lW$-C136EQ -2- Greater than 500,000 1.0 590 420 1.67 1.11 lbs steam per hour plant capacity (a) The total steam production capacity ofall coal- and oH-bumlng equipment in a

.power Plant as ofAtioust 17, 1971. (b) "Maximum average sulfur content in fuel" meansthe average sulfur content in all fuels bumed at any 1time in a powerplant The sulfur content shall be calculated on the basis of 12,000 Btu per pound for solid fuels and ·18,000 Btu per pound for liquid fuels. TI1e determination ofsulfurcontent {percent byweight) offuel shall be carried out in accordance wit11 aprocedure acceptable to tile department. I(c) Solid fuels Include both pulverized coal and all other coal. (d) Liquid fuels Include distillate oil (No. 1and No.2), heavy oil (No.4, No.5, and No. 6), and crude oil. TABLE42

Fuel and sulfurdioxide concentm!ion limitations for fuel burning equipment located ·in Vo/ayne rounty 1·..1aximum weight percent S0 2 ppnw emission rates Fuel type sulfur content in

**tueJ(~J** corrected to 50% excess air{bJ limi!at!ons for fuel-burning eou!pment PulVerized coal 1.00 550 Other coal 0.75 420 Distillate oil Nos. 1&2 0.30 i20' Waste and used oil 1.0 300·"! Crude ·and heavy oil 1.00 400 Nos. 4, 5, &6 {a) The detemllnation ofsulfur content (percent by weight) of fuel shall-be.c;mied.oul in.-. accordance with a procedure acceptable to the department (b) Recordkeeplng necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this rule and compliance testing must be Conducted with afrequency and In a manner acceptable to the department. (c) Acertain degree of control would be required to meet this Jimltif 1.0% sulfur fuel is used in lieu of0.75% sulfurfuel which must be documented and demonstrated in a

**m~mner** acceptable to the department.

(3) The use offuels having sulfur contents as set forth In l<>ble 4·1 and table 42 shall not allow degrad<>tion in the mass rate of particulate emissions. unless otherwise authorized by the department The department may require source emission tests wf1ich may ..!)e perfom1ed by,.or underU1e supeNisionof,.the. department at the expense ofthe owners and may require the submission ofreports to the department both before and after changes are made in the sulfUr content In fuel. ·

(4) The following provisions apply to persons in Wayne county: (a} The maximum weight percent sulfur content in fUel Hrnftations for fuel-bumlng equipment pmvlslons oftable 42 ofthis mle shall not apply to any person wi1o uses

### A.2. 2005-036 EQ, Previous final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective January 31, 2008.

SOAHR 200U36EQ -3- Effootive JanuaryJt. 2008 acombination offUels In such ratios as to meettile sulfUrdioxide concentration limitations specified in table 42 and has obtained written approval from the department for this exemption. The allowable concentration limit will be based on the value In the table for tile fUel having the higher allowable concentration limit.

(b) The maximum weigllt percent sulfUr content In fUel limitations for fUel-burning equipment provisions oftable 42 oftllis rule shall not apply to any person who has received an installation penni! from tile department on acontrol device to desulfllrize tile stack gases and the control device is Installed and operating properly. R336.1401a Definitions.

Rule 401a. As used In tills part: (a) "Power plant" means asingle structure devoted to steam or electric generation, orbotll, and may contain multiple boilers.

(b) "Sulfur recovery planr means any plant that recovers elemental sulfUr from any gas stream. R336.1402 Emission of sulltlr.dioxide from !Uel-buming sources other Ulan power

plants. Rule 402. (I) At afuel buming source ot11er Ulan apower plant It Is unlawfUl for a person to cause or allowthe emission of sulfUrdioxide from tile combustion of any coal or011 !Uel In excessof 1.7pounds per million Btu of heat Input for oil fUel or in excess of2.4 pounds per million Btu of heat Input for coat fuel. ·

(2) The provisions ofsubrule (1) ofthis rule do notapplyto a !Uel-bumlng source that is unable to complywith the specflied emission limits because ofsulfurdioxide emissions caused t>ythe presence ofsulfUr In other raw materials charged to the fuel-bumlng source. Tills exception shall apply ffat any time the actual sulfUr dioxide emission rate exceeds the expected theoretical sulfUrdioxide emission rate from fUel bumlng. The expected U1eoretlcat sulfurdioxide emission rate shall be based on the quantity

**ofl~el·bumed** and the·average sulfUr content·of·the·ruel. ·

(3) At afUel buming source located In Wayne county ot11erthan a power plant, It is unlawfUl for a person to bum fUel tllat does not complywith the sulfur content limitation oftable 43 and unlawful to cause or allowadischarge into the atmosphere from afUel burning source ofsulfurdioxide In excess ofthe sulfurdioxide concentration limit shown In table 43.

(4) Table 43 reads as follows: Table43 Fuel and sulfUrdioxide

**con~~tratlon** limitations for fuel buming sources located In Wavne coun at asource other U1an r werolants Fuel type Maximumweight percent .. so,.ppnw emission rates sulfUr content in fuer(•J corrected to 50% excess limitationsfor !Uel-buming aJr"l 

## Ieouloment Coal 0.75 420 Distillate oil Nos. 1& 2 0.30 120 Waste and used oil 1.0 300'''

### A.2. 2005-036 EQ, Previous final form ofadopted rules, Part 4, effective January 31, 2008.

SOAHR2005-43SEQ Crude and heavy oil Nos. 

# I 4,5, &6 

### -4- 1.00 **Eff~tiveJan~ryJt,** 2008 

# I 400 {a) The detemlination ofsulfurcontent (percent by welghl) offUel shall be carried out In accordance With a procedure acceptable to the department (b) Recordkeeping necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this rule and compliance testing must be conducted with afrequency and In a·manner acceptatJie to the department. (c) Acertain degree of control would be required to meet this limit if1.0% sulfur fuel is used in lieu of0.75% sulfur fuel which must be documented and demonstrated in a manner acceptable to the department.

{5) Tile use offUels having sulfur contents as set fortll in table 43 shall notallow degradation in tl1e mass rate ofparticulate emissions, unless ot11erwise autl10rized by tl1e department. The department may require source emission tests which may be performed by, or underthe supervision of, the department atthe expense ofthe owners and may require the submission of reports to t11e department both before and after changes are made in tl1e sulfur content in fuel.

(6) The following provision> cpply io persons in Wayne county: {a) Tile maximumweight percent sulfur content in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisions oftable 43 orthis rule shall not apply toa person

**1'~10** uses a combination offUels in such ratios as to meet the sulfurdioxide concentration limitations specified In table 43 and has obtained writlen approval from the department for tills exemption. The allowable concentration timit will be based on t11e value In the table forthe fuel having the higherallowable concentration Jimil

(b) The max/mum we/gilt percent sulfur.contenUn.fuel !imitations for IUeJ,buming equipment provisions oftable 43 orthis rule shall not apply to a person who has received an installation penni! from the department for acontrol device to desulfurize the stack gases and the control device is Installed and operating properly. R336.1404 Emission ofsulfurdioXide and sulfuric acid mist from sulfurtc acid

plants. Rule 404. {1) II Is unlaWfulfor aperson to cause or allow the emission orsulfuric acid mist from anysulfuric acid plant In excess of0.50 pounds perton of acid produced, the production being expressed as 100% su/furtc acid.

(2) II is unlawful for

### aperson In Wayne county to cause orallowsulfurdioxide emissions into the atmosphere from anysulfuric acid plant to exceed 6.5 pounds per ton ofacid produced.

{3) Compliance With this rule shall be demonstrated using aprocedure acceptable to the department ' R326.1405 Emissions from sulfur recovel)' plants located '.'litllin.Wayne county.

Rule 405. At sulfur recovery plants located In Wayne county, a person shall not cause orallowthe emission Into the atmosphere of sulfurdioxide, sulfurtrioxide, or sulfuric acid from anysuch sulfur recovery plant to exceed O.ot pounds perpound of sulfur produced.

### A.2. 2005-036 EQ, Previous 

## final form ofadopted rules, Part 

## 4, effective January 31, 2008.

SOAHR 2005-{)JOEQ -5- Effe-,dve Janua!yJf, 2008 R 336.1406 Hydrogen sulfide emissions from facilities located within Wayne county.

Rule 406. ('I) A person In Wayne county shall not cause orallow the combustion ofany refine!)' process gas stream that contains hydrogen sulfide in a concentration ofgreaterthan 100 grains per 100 cubic feet of gas without removal ofthe hydrogen sulfide In excess ofthis concentration.

(2) When the odororhydrogen sulfide Is found to exist beyond the property line of asource, a person In Wayne county shall not cause orallow the concentration of hydrogen sulfide to exceed 0.005 parts per million by volume for a maximum period of2 minutes. R 336.1407. SulfUrcompound emissions from sources located witllin Wayne county

and not previouslyspecified. Rule 407. Both of the follo\\1ng apply to process and fuel buming sources located wit11ln Wayne county to which the provisions of R336.1401 toR335:1406 do not apply.

(a) A person shall not cause orallowthe emission into tile atmosphere gases with a concentration ofsulfurdioxide greaterthan 300 parts per million byvolume, v.111c11 snail be corrected to 50% excess air.

(b) A person slmll not cause or allowtile emission into the atmospt1ere gases \'.1th a concentration ofsulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide ora combination thereofgreater than 15 milligrams per cubic meter, which shall be corrected to 50% excess air. R 336.1420. Applicability detemlinations, definitions, and permitling requirements

under CAJR sulfUrdioxide trading program. Rule 420. (1) As used in tills rule, "CAIR' means clean air interstate rule. (2) The provisions of40 C.F.R. §97.202, §97.220 to §97.224 and ti1e appropriate opt-in provisions of40 C.F.R. §97.280 to §97.288 (2006) are adopted by reference in tills rule and are applicable to these rules. Copies of 40 C.F.R. §97.202, §97.220 to §97.224, and §97.280 to §97.288 are available for inspection and purchase at the Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division, 525'West Alfegan Street, P.O. Box30260, Lansing, Michigan 48909-7760, at a cost as ofthe time of adoption of thls rule of$70.00. Copies may also be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, Govemmenl Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250-7954, at a cost as ofthe time ofadoption oftills rule of $60.00; oron the United statesgovemment printing office intemetweb site at wl'.w.access.gpo.gov.

(3) Each CAIR sulfUrdioxide source. as defined in 40 C.F.R. §97.2021s required to apply for a CAJR pem1tt In accordance witll 40 C.F.R. §97.220 to §97.224. Tills pennit shall be administered in accordance with the procedural requirements of R 336.1214 and shall be Incorporated Into the facility's renewable operating pennit as an attachment.

### B.1. 2011-029 EQ, Secretary ofState's notice offiling Administrative Rules, dated March 11, 2013. B.2. 2005-036 EQ, Secretary ofState's notice offiling Administrative Rules, dated January 31, 2008.

### 8.1 ...2011-029 EQ, Secretary of State's notice offiling Administrative Rules, dated March 11, 2013. 

# ... .

STATE orMICIHGA.'l Runt JoHNSON,

**S1~RETARY** oF STATE

DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANSING March 11,2013 

### NOTICE OFFlUNG

**AD~1Th1STRATIYE HULl'.~**  To: Secretaryofthe SMatc Clerk of1hc House ofRepresentath'I..'S Joim Committee on Administrative

**Rul~s** State Office ofRegulatory

**Rdnv~ntiun** (Adminislrativc Rule- #2011·029-EQ) Legislative Service Bureau (Secreurry ofState Filing .1!!3-0J.-05) De-pnrtment ofEnvironmentn.l Quality In accordnnce withthe provisions ofSL'ction 46(I) ofAct 306, Public Acts of1 '>69, a.•;; amended, and Executive Order 1995-6, tbis 

### is to advise you that the Michigan Department ofLicensing and Rcgulmory Affairs and tho

**Stat~.Onice.ofRe~ulntory** Reinvenlion filed Administrative Rule #2011.029-EQ (Secretory ofState Filing#13-03·05) pn this date at4:41 P.M. for the Department ofEnvironment.al 1 entitled ..Pari 4. Emissions Limitarions and

**Pruhlbitions-Su/fi~r-lkm·in~** Compounds• 1, · These rules become cft"ecliYe immt.'<.liatcly upon

**filing.~vith** the Secretary ofSw.tc unlcs.s adopted under scc1ions 33, 44 or4Sa(6) of 1969 PA 306. Rules adopted under'these sections become effecti-ve 7days after filing with the Secretory ofState. 

### Sincerely, RuthJohnson



# ~;~~~.**Y\~\JS-lts\·l~**

Robin L Honstotl, Dep:\ttrtil!rt!al Supervisor Oilice ofthe Great Seal·· Enclosure

OFf'ICE Of THE GREAT $EAl :

**C~** SOU'I'H WASHINGTON

**SOUARC~·GUn'[• !"•r;,•AH~lk-~.-MI\}Htll?.tN$:."te•**  ·· 1-8tii·SOS·IJICII

**{l•llll·H1-l;~2"<1j** V.WW .lli<!hlg.i

**ri.IIQ't/5Q~**

## 8.2. 2005-036 Eg, Secretary of State's notice offiling


## Administrat,iv~ Rules, dated January 

## 31, 2008.

To: Secretoryofll1e Senate STATP. QFlvhonr:JAN TEIUtt1NNN L',ND, SEC:RETARY Of STATI:; DEPARTMENT OF STATE LAJ.'SINO January31, 2008 NOTICE OFFllJNG ADI\!INISTRATIVERULES
Clerk oflhcHouseufRcprcscntath•es Joint Comruiltee on Admlnistrotive Rules StateOfficeofAdministrativeHearings andRules (Rule# 2005-036 EQ) ,LegislativeServiceBureau (08'01-01) VDepnrtmen1 ofEnvironmentltl Quality In accordance with lheprovisionsofSection 46(1) ofAct306, Public



### Acl~ of1969, os amended, and ExecutiveOrder 1995-6this is to advise you that theMichigan Ocpar1me.nt <";IfLabor & Economic Grov.1h, State OfficeofAdministrntiveHeildllgs nnd Rules filed at4:35P.M. this date, ndministrativerule (08-01-01) for the Department'ofEnvirontncntnl QunHty, "Part4. Emi.sslonsLimittltiOnsandProMbitions-Sulfur-Bean'ng Compounds". Theseruk.s become effectiveimmediatelyupon filing witb the SecretaryofStateuu1css tldop[cd nnder sections 33, 44, 

### or 4.Sa(6) of1969 PA 306. Rules adopted tmdcrthesesections



### becom~ effe-Ctive7days after filingv.<itb the SecretaryofStale. Sincerely, Terri Lynn Land SccrelnryofState



# t r)
. I ' / .

**"f;·Lt-vk~** 

### •tJtt(.s-fz-).,__ 

## C 1-.J!1 Robin

**Hotlston~** Office SupelYisor Office ofthe Greot Seol Enclosure 

## I<EC~HIIED FEIJ 1Z2DDB 

### AIR QUALITYD/V.

OffiCE OF HIE OAfAT S1:At lO.IJ

**~;>Ql,lTII** WASIHNOfON SOU.\flE' LMISING. MJCJIIOAII <\SS\6 www.**.!,U~t>lgan.oovhol** • (1'117} 373·1&31

### C.1. 2011-029 EQ, Agency Report to JCAR, dated November 5, 2012. C.2. 2005-036 EQ, Agency Report to JCAR, dated October 15, 2007.

### C.1. 2011-029 EO, Agency Report to JCAR, dated November 5, 2012. Agency Report to the JOINT COMMITTEE ONADMINISTRATIVE RULES This form must be completed by the department/agency that has the statutory authority for promulgating the rules. Please send an electronic copy ofthis fonn to the 

## Officeof Regulatory Reinvention (ORR) at orr@michigan.gov. The ORR will review the document, the newspaper adve1tisements, and the corresponding mles prior to completing the legal certification ofthe mles. Pleasebe sureto sendto the ORRproofs ofpublication for the three newspaper adve1tisements required by MCL 24.242(1). You may mail them or send them as a scanned attachment. Department [Depa1tment ofEnvironmental Quality (DEQ)

Air Quality Division (AQD) ned by ORR).

**~--.** 

### Title ofrules: Part4. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions
- Sulfur Bearing Compounds 

## 1. Name, address, FAX and phonenumbers ofagency contactperson: Robert Rusch, 517-373-7041 or mschr@michigan.gov; Mary Maupin, 517-373-7039 or maupinm@michigan.gov; Deprutment ofEnvironmental Quality, Air Quality Division, Constitution Hall, 3'd FloorNorth, 525 West Allegan Street, Lansing, MI 48933; FAX: 517-241-7499. 2. Purposefor the proposed rules and background: Therevisions toR 336.1401 (Rule401), R 336.1402 (Rule 402), R 336.1404 (Rule404), R 336.1407 (Rule 407) and R 336.1420 (Rule 420) address commentsreceived from the United States Environmental ProtectionAgency (U.S. EPA). TheAQD submitted to the U.S. EPA a proposedrevision to Michigan's State Implementation Plan (SIP) consisting ofthepromulgated revisions and additions to the Prut 4 Rules that becameeffective January 31, 2008. Thesemle amendments conectminor deficiencies identified bythe U.S. EPA. Rule 420 will berevised to address changes the U.S. EPA requested for the implementation ofthe CleanAirInterstate Rules (CAIR). 3. Summai'Y ofproposed rules: Rules 401,402,404,407, and 420, (Emissions ofSulfurDioxide (S02) fi'Oln powerplants; other fuel burning sources; sulfuric acid plants; sulfur compound emissions from sources located within Wayne County and notpreviously specified; and CAIRprogram requirements) contain minorrevisions includingreferences to specific federal and stateregulations, procedures, and

### C.1. 2011-029 EQ, Agency Report to JCAR, dated November 5, 2012.


### methods; format changes, (e.g. capitalization and S02 abbreviations); and more updates to the address and internet information. Rule 420, Applicability determinations, definitions, and permitting requirements under CAIR sulfur dioxide trading program, will be revised by removing the word "appropriate" in reference to some opt-inprovisions, in order to include all o t-in rovisions. 4. Name ofnewspapers and date ofpublication in newspapers (minimum 3 newspapers ofgeneral circulation, representing differentparts ofthe state, one ofwhich mustbe located in the UpperPeninsula): The Mining Journal, October 1, 2012; The Oakland Press, September 30, 2012; The Lansing State Journal, October I, 2012. 5. Time, date, location and duration of ublic hearin November I, 2012; 10:00 a.m.- 11 :0.::.0-=ac:.:.m:.::._.___ _ 6. 

### Date of ublication ofrules and ublic hearin 

## ister: October 15, 2012 7. Agency rep1·esentative(s) attending hearing (include agency name and title of representative[s]): G. Vinson Hellwig, Division Chief, AQD; Mike Jackson, Administration Section Manager, AQD; Carrie Barr, Rule Liaison, AQD; Asad Khan, AQD; Mary Maupin,· AQD; Tracey McDonald, AQD; and David Fiedler, Regulatory Affairs Officer, DEQ. 8. Persons submittin letters, comments and testimony ofsu ort: None 9. Persons submittingletters, comments and testimony ofopposition: 

# INone

None Name ofperson completing this report: 

# IRobert Rusch 

# I

Date report completed: 

# INovember 5, 2012

(ORR-JCARMay2011)

### C.2. 2005-036 EQ, Agency Report to JCAR, dated October 15, 2007


### Agency Repmi to the JOINT COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES This form must be completed by the depmiment/agency that has the statutmy authority for promulgating the mles. Please send an electronic copy ofthis form to the State Office of Administrative Hem·ings and Rules (SOAHR) at soahr_rules@michigan.gov. The SOAHR will review the document, the newspaper advertisements, and the corresponding mles prior to completing the legal certification ofthe rules. Please be sure to send to the SOAHR proofs ofpublication for the three newspaper advertisements required by MCL 24.242(1). You may mail them or send them as a scmmed attaclunent. Department 

# IEnvironmental Quality (DEQ)

Division/a ency/bureau: Air Quality Division (AQD)

·· ·Rulesetnumber 2005-036EQ Title ofrules: ncdbySOAHR 

# IPati4. EmissionLimitations and Prohibitions- Sulfur-Bearing Compounds

11. Name, address, FAX and phone numbers ofagencycontactperson: [Mary

## Ann Halbeisen, Constitution Hall; Phone 517-373-7045; Fax 517-241-7499 

# .=:J

12. Purposefo1· the proposed rules and background: The Wayne County Depmtment ofPublic Health, Air Quality ManagementDivision (WCAMD), adopted rules to control emissions ofsulfur bearing compounds on March 23, 1972, thatwere more stringent than the states rules for certain sources. These rules were subsequently madepmt ofthe Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP). In September 2001 Wayne County ended its air pollution controlprogram and the WCAMD. The modifications to R 336.140I, R 336.1402, and R 336.1404 (Rules 401, 402, and 404) and the addition ofR336.1405 toR 336.1407 (Rules 405 to 407) are intended to incorporate the Wayne County sulfur limitation into the state'srules to make them consistent with the federally approved SIP. In Rule 401, existingTables 41 and 42 have been combined and a new Table 42 was added that contains limits applicable to Wayne County sources. Also in Rule 401, certain portions ofthe mlehave been deleted that were originally included to allow companies additional time to come into compliance with the rule limits. Theseprovisions are nowobsoletebecause all the companieshave since come into compliance.

### C.2. 2005-036 EQ, Agency Report to JCAR, dated October 15, 2007. Rule (CAIR) whichreduces transported emissions ofsulfur dioxide (S02) 

### from electric generating units. Rule 420 adopts the opt-in provisions of40 C.F.R., Part 97, to allow unaffected facilities to participate in the regional S02 

### trading program associated with the CAIR. Tlus was requested by the stakeholder workgroup.

. 

### 13. Summary ofproposed rules: Rules 401 and 402 containpercent sulfur-in-fuel and S02 

### concentration limits for power plants and sources other than powerplants, respectively. Rule 40I a contains certain definitions used in the Part 4 rules. Rule 404 specifies 

## SOz and sulfuric acid mist limitations for sulfuric acid plants. Rule 405 specifies various sulfur compound limits applicable to sulfhrrecovery plants in Wayne County. Rule 406 contains hydrogen sulfide emissionrestrictions for sources located within Wayne County. Rule 407 contains sulfur compoundlimitsthat would apply to sources not specified in the previous Pmi 4 mles. Rule 420 is adopting the opt-inprovisions of40 C.F.R., Part 97, to allowunaffected facilities to pmiicipate inthe CAIRregional 

## SOz trading program.
14. Name ofnewspapers and date ofpublication in newspapers (minimum 3 newspapers ofgeneral circulation, representing differentparts ofthe state, one of which must belocated in theUpperPeninsula): The notice was published inthe following newspapers onJune II, 2007: Lansing StateJournal Oakland Press MarquetteMiningJoumal 15. Time, date, location and duration ofpublic hearing: July 19,2007, 10:00-10:50 a.m., Constitution Hall, 525 West Allegan Street, Lansing,



## Michlga~n~------~~----~~--~------------~--------------~ June 15, 2007l ·-- - 

### C.2. 2005-036 EQ, Agency Report to JCAR, dated October 15, 2007.

17. Agency representative(s) attendinghearing (include agency name and title of reJresentative s : Mary Ann Dolehanty, Supervisor, Thermal Process Unit, AQD Mary

## Ann Halbeisen, Administrative Rules Coordinator, AQD Asadullah Khan, Enviromnental Engineer, AQD Steve Kish, Enviromnental Engineer Specialist, AQD S M l DEQ R l t R 

### fi Offi

usan au, egu a ory e orru 1cer MaryMaupin, Environmental Quality Specialist, AQD Jeffi·ey Rathbun, Environmental Engineer, AQD Barbara Rosenbaum,Supervisor, Air QualityEvaluation Section, AQD Teresa Walker, Environmental QualityAnalyst, AQD

18. Names, organizations and (complete) addresses ofpersons attending the -- 

### hearing: 

# r

•. Jolm Becsey, Executive Director, Asphalt PavementAssociation ofMichigan, 6639 ,!!JCanturin Drive, Suite 120, Lansing, MJ 48917 

# .- ·David Yanochko, Senior Eil\•iromnentatEngineer, AsphaltPaveriiefl1 Ass6ciatiori of .,. lv1ichigan, 39255 Country Club Drive, B-25, FarmingtonHills, MI 48331 19. Persons submitting letters, comments and testimony ofSU.£Il<l.l't: Douglas Aburano, Engilieer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Region 5, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 77 West JacksonBoulevard, Chicago, IL 60604-3590 20. Persons submitting letters, comments and testimony ofopposition: John Becsey, ExecutiveDirector,Asphalt PavementAssociation ofMichigan, 6639 Canturin Drive, Suite 120, Lansing, MI48917 21. Summaryofsuggestions to modify proposed rules: a. John Becsey, ExecutiveDirector, AsphaltPavementAssociation ofMichigan _(APAI\1).

Comment: "APA1v1 has several concernsregarding the languageintherule andhowit would affect APAM's members operati11g in Wayne County. Itis ourbeliefthat, unless these issues are resolved, itwillneedlesslyputmembers at a competitive disadvantage to members operating outside Wayne County." Response: TheAQD is willing to makechanges to the mleto the greatestextent possibleto remove any competitivedisadvantages but is limited by therequirement that the changes need to be approved bytheEPAto becomepmi ofthe SIP. Comment: "In general it appears thatthemlewas written to address boilers ratherthan a '

### C.2. 2005-036 EQ, Agency Report to JCAR, dated October 15, 2007. variety offuel firing processes, including but not limited to aggregate dryers. Tllis is most readily evidentin proposed Rule 402, Table 43, and Rule 407 in which the 

## S02 emission concentrations are specified "as corrected to 50% excess air." While 50% excess air is an appropriate conection for a boiler, it is not appropriate for an aggregate dryer. "The amount ofair requ.ired to operate an aggregate dryer is not dependent on the airrequired for proper combustion, but onthe airrequired to properly dry and heat the product." Response: The 50% excess air specification is not an operational requirement and is included to normalize the 

## S02 

### concentration limits to the same basis when applied to various source types that operate under different sets ofconditions. Comment: "Forair permittingpurposes, 

## S02 control efficiencies of43% when tunning mixes contaitling recycled asphaltproduct and 72% whenrunning virgin aggregate mixes have been established. However, during recentpermit negotiations, the MDEQ-AQD staffwere unwillingto consider the proven, inherent 

## S02control provided by HMA [hot mix asphalt) plants when considering the proposed exemptionprovided by Rule 402(6)(b), because "acontrol device was not installed. Revise the wording in Rule 402(6)(b) to allow for processes that inherently control 

# so2 to take advantage oftllis exemption ifthey so choose. Forthe.foresPeable future, APAMmemberswill likely he abie to operate economically with fuels at'a maximum sulfur content 

## Of 1.0% and the exemption provided by subtule (6)(b) will be unnecessary for most members. However, as fuel costs increase, APAlvi members may wish to increase the flexibility inthe fuels they are authorized to bum by applyingforpennits to move from Table 43 tci a sitespecific fuel limit, based on HMAplants' inherent 

## S02 concentration." Response: The original intent ofRule 402(6)(b) was to offer an exemption for sources that installed wet scmbbingordry injection flue gas desulfurization (FGD) unit that typically acllieves upwards of95% control. The AQD is currently and will continue to have discussions with the EPA regarding somepossiblefuture mlechanges which would allow a source to take advantage ofany inherent control they mightbeachieving, but indications are thatthey are unwilling to approve sucha change at this time. Comment: "APAM has several suggestions our members believe would serve to clarify the proposed mles." "Includerecycled used oil it1 Table 43, Rule 402, as part ofthe row for 'Crudeand heavy oil Nos. 4, 5, & 

### 6.' This would help clarify that the maximum sulfur content for RUO [rec)'cled used oil] is consistent tor thatot"'i:JilNos. 4,·

# s; & 

### "'6 at · 1.0%." Response: A categoqfor "wasteand used oil" was added to both Table43 in Rule 402 and Table 42 in Rule 401, and the percent sulfur in fuel limit was setto 1.0% with a concentration limit of300parts permillion by volume (ppmv). A footnote clarifies that meeting both limits assumes somelevel ofcontrol. Comment: "APAM believes the concentration listed in Rule 407(a) should be raised to 400 ppmv consistent with the concentrationlisted for 'Ctude and heavy oil Nos. 4, 5, & 

### 6' listed inTable43. Thecurrent concentration of300 ppmv appears to be a remnant for

### C.2. 2005-036 EQ, Agency Report to JCAR, dated October 15, 2007. 

### the old Wayne County Ordinance in which the maximum sulfur contents in 'crude and heavy oil' was listed as 0.7%. As the fuel sulfi1r limit in Table 43 has been raised to 1.0%, the concentration limit in subrule (a) should also be increased. The concentrations for sulfuric acid and sulfi1r trioxide should also be adjusted consistently with the new S02 concentration." Response: Since RUO was not specifically listed as a fuel type in the Wayne County Ordinance, sources using it have been subject to the 300 ppmv concentration limit that was in Section 6.3G ofthe ordinance. With the addition ofa "waste and used oil" category to Rules 40I and 402, sources using it would be subject to these rules instead and the 300 ppmv was transferred to these rules as to not allow for arelaxation ofan existing standard. Comment: "APAM recommends provisions be added to Rule 407(a) to set a sitespecific fi1el sulfur limit as part ofapermitreview, rather than a stack gas concentration corrected to 50% excess air. This site-specific sulfi1r limit would be based on the S02 control inl1erent in the process and would result in a simpler compliance determination forj:JOth the MDEQ-AQD and APAM members." if;
.. 

### Rest)ohse: ·Withthe addition ofthe waste a11d used oil categotyandrevisingthe term "fuel burning equipment" to "fuel burning sources," hot mix asphaltplants using this type offuel would be subject to Rule 402 and not Rule 407. Rules typically serve as a baseline starting point for establishing permitlimits. b. Douglas Abm·ano, EnvironmentalEngineet·, EPA Region 5 Comment: Rule 420(l)(b) defines "CAIR sulfur dioxide permit." We believe this should be "CAIRpermit" which is already defined in 40 CFR 97.202. Since you are adopting theprovisions of40 CFR97.202, it is unnecessary for you to include this defmition. We recommend you delete Rule 420(l)(b). Response: DEQ agrees and has deleted the subrule. Comment: Rule 420(l)(c) defines "Michigan EGUs." We believe this definition is also not necessary and should be deleted. Response: DEQ removed the definition in the NOxpmiionofthe CAIRrules (see 2005-36EQ) but the removal from this parallel rule was overlooked. DEQ agrees with the cmmnent and the definition will be removed. Comment: Rule 420(2) currently adopts the S02opt-inprovisions of40 CFR97.281- 288. This should be expanded to include 40 CFR 97.280-288. Response: DEQ agrees and has corrected the typographical error.

### C.2. 2005-036 EO, Agency Report to JCAR, dated October 15, 2007.



### Comment: Rule 420(2) should also be expanded to include the permitting CAIR 

### S02 

### permitting requirements found by adopting 40 CFR 97.220-224. This will be used in Rule 420(3). Response: DEQ agrees and has added the suggested adoptionto ourrules. Comment: Rule420(3) reads, "Michigan EGUs are required to apply for and receive a CAIR sulfur dioxicitj permit.'· This ohould be changed to "Each CAIR 

### S02 

### source, as defined in40 CFR 97.202, is required to apply for a CAIRpenni!inaccordance with 40 CFR 97.220-224." This change will be consistent with comments I, 2, 3, and 4. Response: DEQ agrees and corrected the language to clarify the original intent.



## Date report completed: 

# IOctober 15, 2007 

# :=J

(SOAHR-JCAR June 2005)·

### 0.1. 2011-029 EQ, Opening Statement, dated November 1, 2012. 0.2. 2011-029 EQ, Staff Report, dated October 30, 2012. 0.3. 2005-036 EQ, Opening Statement, dated July 19, 2007. 0.4. 2005-036 EQ, Staff Statement, dated July 19, 2007.

### D.1. 2011-029 EQ, Opening Statement, dated November 1, 2012.
Department of Environmental Quality Opening Statement By-: Mike-Jackson, Hearing Officer November 1, 2012 Introduction fvly name is Mike Jackson, and I am Supervisor ofthe· Administration Division at the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. I will be serving as the Hearing Officer for this public hearing on the proposed administrative rule revisions to: Part 4 - 

### Emission Limitations and Prohibitions - Sulfur Bearing Compounds, (ORR 2011-029 

### EQ). Parf9-, 

### Emission Limitations and Prohibitio,ls- Miscellaneous, (ORR 2012-017 EO). 

### With me are Carrie Barr, Administrative Rules Coordinator for the Air Quality Division, and Vince Hellwig, Chief ofthe Air Quality Division, who is representing the Director ofthe Department, Dan Wyant, as the decision-maker on administrative rules. Iwould. also like to introduce Asad Khan from the Air Quality Division, who has been instrumental in developing the proposed revisions to these administrative rules. Hearing Agenda First, we will briefly describe the proposed rule revisions. Following that, we will take your comments, then describe what will happen aftertoday's hearing. Background Information Asad Khan will now briefly summarize the proposed revisions. Purpose of Public Hearing Thank you Asad. Now, Carrie Barr will describe the purpose oftoday's hearing and how your comments will be used. The purpose oftoday's hearing is to give anyone interested in the proposed rules an opportunity to provide information that the Department can use in making its decision.

### D.1. 2011-029 EO, Opening Statement, dated November 1, 2012. As you came in, you were given an opportunity to fill out a public comment card. We request that everybody fill out a card and indicate ifyou wish to make comments. We will use these cards to maintain a record of people who are interested in the proposed rules and to call upon those who want to make a statement today. When all ofthe cards have been completed, we will ask if anyone else would like to make a statement. When your name is called, please approach the table and give your statement. If you have written comments or materials that you would like to present, please hand them to Mr. Jackson as you come to the table. Before you begin your comments, please state your name and any group or association you may represent. This hearing is being recorded and your comments will become a part ofthe information that the Department will consider when making its decision on the proposed rules. The public comment period for the proposed rules ends today at 5:00p.m. Any and all comments received by 5:00 p.m. today will be considered when the Department makes its decision. rollowing the public hearing, we will review all ofthe comment.s and prepare an Agency Report, which includes the response to comments. The Agency Report will be available on the Department's website or by contacting the Air Quality Division office. The proposed rules and the Agency Report will be submitted to the State Office of Regulatory Reinvention and the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. Once approved, the rules will be filed with the Secretary of State and become effective immediately. It is estimated that this process will take approximately two months to complete. Thank you Carrie. I will now begin calling the names ofthose who have indicated that they would like to make a statement. Closing Statement Thank you for your comments and cooperation. We appreciate that you have shown an interest in these proposed rule revisions by taking the time to be here today. As previously mentioned, the public comment period ends today at 5:00 p.m. Ifyou have any questions regarding the proposed rule, Air Quality Division staff will be available immediately following this hearing to answer them. The hearing is now closed. Thank you again. (NOTE: If no one present hearing may be closed at 1 hour mark.)

### D.2. 2011-029 EQ, Staff Report, dated October 30, 2012. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL RULES ORR 2011-029 EQ, ORR 2011-017 EQ SUBJECT 

### The Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division (AQD), is proposing to revise the following administrative rules under the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended (MCL 324.101 to 324.90106): Part 4 - Emission Limitations and Prohibitions- Sulfur Bearing Compounds, R 336.1401, R 336.1402, R 336.1404, R 336.1407, and R 336.1420; Part 9- Emission Limitations and Prohibitions- Miscellaneous, R 336.1902, R 336.1933, R 336.1948, R 336.1949, R 336.1950. PURPOSE AND SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED RULES 

### Pa"tt 4 revisions · . The revisions to R 336. 1401, R 336.1402, R 336.1404, R 336.1407, and R 336.1420 address comments 

## received from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). The AQD submitted to the U.S. EPA a proposed revision to Michigan's State· Implementation Plan (SIP) consisting of the promulgated revisions and additions to the Part 4 Rules that became effective January 31, 2008. The U.S. EPA identified deficiencies in the submittal. These rule amendments·addre·ss the· comments 

## received from the U.S. EPA. Rule 401, Emission of Sulfur Dioxide (S02) from Power Plants; Rule 402, Emission of S02from fuel-burning sources otherthan power plants; Rule 404, Emission ofS02 and sulfuric acid mist from sulfuric acid plants; and Rule 407, Sulfur compound emissions from sources located within Wayne county and not previously specified, contain revisions to correct deficiencies identified by the U.S. EPA. Rule 420, Applicability determinations, definitions; and permitting) · · requirements under CAIR sulfur dioxide trading program, will be revised by removing the word "appropriate" which EPA believes inappropriately allows Director discretion. Part 9 revisions Current Rule 902 contains adoption of standards by reference. The adoption of standards by reference for the proposed Rules 948, 949 and 950 will be added to Rule 902 and adoption dates and costs listed for all the standards will be updated.

### 0.2. 2011-029 EQ, Staff Report, dated October 30, 2012. R 336.1933 (Rule 933) Standards for hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators are adopted by reference. Rule 933 is being rescinded because there are no units in the state that are affected by this rule. Rule 948 will adopt by reference U.S. EPA's rule, 40 CFR Part 63, subpart YYYYY, promulgated December 28, 2007, which requires a pollution prevention plan to restrict the amount ofchlorinated plastics, lead, and free organic liquids charged to an electric arc furnace and restricts charging the furnace with certain metallic scrap, such as engine blocks and transformers. It also requires the removal of mercury switches from motor vehicle scrap before it is used. Rule 948 would prevent the introduction ofcontaminants such as oil, mercury, and chlorinated plastics to electric arc furnaces which would the level of hazardous toxic air contaminants emitted. Rule 949 will adopt by reference the U.S. EPA's rule, 40 CFR Part 63, subpart ZZZZZ, promulgated January 2, 2008, which contains management practices for iron and steel foundries and specifies requirements for scrap not to contain certain items and materials, such as oil filters and chlorinated plastics. It also requires the removal of mercury switches from motor.vehicle scrap before it is . ·used. Rule 949 prevents the same type of contaminants as listed for Rule 948 from being introduced to the steel making process, thereby reducing the level of toxic air contaminants emitted into the air. Rule 950 will adopt by reference the U.S. EPA's rule, 40 CFR Part 63, subpart ZZZZZZ, promulgated September 25, 2009, which contains management practices for aluminum, copper, and other nonferrous foundries and specifies requirements for scrap to be depleted to the extent practicable of hazardous metals. It also requires a management practices plan to reduce toxic air emissions and establishes particulate emission limits for large copper and other non-ferrous foundries. Rule 950 would prevent the introduction ofcontaminants such as lead, manganese, nickel, chromium, cadmium and beryllium into aluminum, copper and other non-ferrous melting furnaces and thereby reduce the level of hazardous toxic air contaminants emitted into the air. ACTIONS FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING 

### Following the public hearing, the AQD staffwill review the comments received and make appropriate changes to the proposed rules. The proposed rule package will then be submitted to the Office of Regulatory Reinvention, the Legislative Service Bureau, and the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules as prescribed by the Administrative Procedures Act, 1969 PA 306, as amended. Next, the rules will go into effect immediately after filing with the Secretary of State's office. The final Part 4 rules will be submitted to the U.S. EPA as a revision to the State Implementation Plan.i1 

### D.2. 2011-029 EQ, Staff

### Report, dated October 30, 2012.

Prepared by: Robert Rusch Strategy Development Unit Air Quality Evaluation Section Air Quality Division, DEQ October 30, 2012

### D.3. 2005-036 EQ, Opening Statement, dated July 19, 2007. Department of Environmental Quality Opening Statement By: Barbara Rosenbaum, Hearings Officer July 19, 2007 Introduction 

### Good morning ladies and gentlemen. My name is Barbara Rosenbaum, and I am the Supervisor ofthe Air Quality Evaulation Section in the Air Quality Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. I will be serving as the Hearing Officer for this public hearing on the revision of Parts 4 and 6, the rescission of Part 12, and the addition of Part 19 ofthe Air Pollution Control Rules. With me today are other DEQ staffwho will be assisting with this hearing. Seated

. with.me a.re T17.resaWalker, Steve Ki<'h, Asap Khan, anq JeffreyRathbun, who

prepared the 'rule revisions, andVir1ce Hellwig, Chief ofthe Air Quality Division, who is representing the Director ofthe Department of Environmental Quality, the decision-maker on administrative rules. Hearing Agenda 

### To describe howthis is going to work today, Iwill begin with some background information about whywe are here today. I will then describe the purpose ofthe hearing and how your comments will be used. Following that, I will outline the procedures under which we will take your comments and then describe what will happen after today's hearing. It will then be your time to provide comments, and we will spend the majority oftime today listening to those comments. At the end ofthe hearing, I will provide a short summary and closing. Background Information 

### By way ofbackground information, the Air Quality Division is responsible·for protecting_Michigan's air resources. The law governing those responsibilities is Sections 5503 and 5512 of Part 55, Air Pollution Control, ofthe Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended.. We are here today for a public hearing four rule packages on amendments to the administrative rules for Air Pollution Control: • 2005-036EQ, Part 4, Emission Limitations and Prohibitions-Sulfurbearing Compounds. • 2007-005EQ, Part 12, Emission Averaging and Emission Reduction Credit Trading. • 2007-006EQ, Part 6, Consumer Product Rules.

### 0.3.2005-036 EQ, Opening Statement, dated July 19, 2007.

• 2004-054EQ, Part 19, New Source Review for Major Sources Impacting Nonattaiment Areas. Teresa Walker will summarize the proposed revisions to Part 4 (2005-036EQ) and Part 12' (200?c005EQ). Asad Khan will summarize the proposed revisions to Part 6 (2007-006EQ). 

## JeffRathbun will summarize the proposed new rules for Part 19 (2004-054EQ). Purpose ofPublic Hearing In order for rule promulgation to occur, the DEQ must follow the procedures set forth in the Administration Procedures Act of 1969 and the State Office of Administrative Hearings and Rule's procedures. ThE:1 purpose oftoday's hearing is to give anyone interested in the proposed rules

**a~pportunity** 

### to provide information that the QEQ can use in making the deCision. Please recogtlize that thn DEQ can only use tho information you provide if it relates to the criteria that the DEQ must use in making a decision. Some ofyou may want to simply express your support or opposition to the proposed action. We will be happy to make note ofyour position, but please
. understand that the DEQ is, by law, not allowed to base our decision on whether or not there is widespread support oropposition to theproposed action. Procedures In just a minute, I will outline the procedures we will use in taking your comments today. Before I do so, however, I need to mention that the notice ofthis hearing was published in the Oakland Press, Lansing State Journal, and Marquette Mining Journal on June 11, 2007. The notice and proposed rules were also published in the Michigan Register on June 15, 2007. Copies ofthe hearing notice, Regulatory Impact Statement, proposed rules, and summary ofthe proposed rules were made available to those interested and are available here today. As you came today, you were given an opportunity to fill out a public comment card. We request that everybody fill out a card and indicate ifyou wish to make comments. We will use these cards to maintain a record ofpeople interested in the proposed rules and to call upon those who want to make a statement today. To ensure that the hearing is conducted·il'l·a-fair manner; we-willfollow these- ... steps: 1. I will call on those who have indicated on the cards that they would like to speak in the general order in which the cards were turned in. When all the

### 0.3. 2005-036 EQ, Opening Statement, dated July 19, 2007. cards have been completed, I will ask ifanyone else would like to make a statement. 2. When your name is called, please come to the microphone, face me, and make your statement. Ifyou have written comments or materials you would like to present, please hand them to me as you come to the microphone. As you begin your comments, please state your name and any group or association you may represent. 3. Each person will be given five minutes to make their comments. I will indicate to youwhen you have one minute lefLP!ease begin wrapping up your comments and end within the allotted time. If need be, I will indicate when your time has ended. I ask that we all be courteous and respectful to one another today. Only one person should be speaking at a time. Please do not interrupt a speaker and please also recognize that the DEQ staff are here today to provide a fair opportunity for you to express your comments on the proposed rules and to listen to those comments. How the Information Will be Used This hearing is being recorded and your comments will 15e a part ofthe information the DEQ will consider in making its decision on the proposed rules. The public comment period for the proposed rules ends today at 5:00 p.m. Following the public hearing, the DEQ staffwill review all comments and prepare an Agency Report, which includes the response to comments. The Agency Report will be available on the DEQ website or by contacting the Air Quality Division office. The proposed rules and the Agency Report will be submitted to the State Office ofAdministrative Hearings and Rules and the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. Following JCAR, the rules will be filed with the Secretary of State and become effective immediately. It is estimated this process will take approximately four to five months. Thank you for your attention. Iwill now begirtcalling the names ofthosewho have indicated they would like to make a statement. Closing Statement Thank you for your comments and cooperation today. We appreciate your interest in_these proposed rules and that you took the time to be here today. As indicated at the beginning ofthe hearing, the closing date of the public comment period is today at 5:00 p.m. and an Agency Report will be prepared. The hearing is now closed. Thank you again.

### D.4. 2005-036 EQ, Staff Statement, dated July 19, 2007.

STAFF STATEMENT AIR QUALITY DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL· QUALITY

By: Teresa Walker, Strategy Development Unit July 19, 2007 SUBJECT: Proposed administrative rules R 336.14018, R 336.1401, R 336.1402, R 336.1404 toR 336.1407, and R 336.1420 PRINCIPAL REASONS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES This Rules package (2005-036EQ) contains revisions and additions to the Air Quality Divisions' Part 4 Rules which address emissions ofSulfur Dioxide and sulfur bearing compounds. The main purpose ofthese changes is to incorporate

.



## sulf~Jr limitations that were previously approved into the Michigan State ·.· · · Implementation Plan (SIP) by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) as part ofthe Wayne County Department of Public Health, Air Quality Management Division (WCAMD) ordinance. The.WCAMD was abolished in the fall of2001, and the ordinance provisions for sulfur ended as well. These sulfur limitations were applicable to sulfur-emitting sources located in Wayne County. The adoption ofthis rules package will create states rules consistent with the federally approved SIP for the sources in Wayne county. Other changes to the rules include removing·antiquated provisions that aUhe.fime tney were originally adopted, allowed Companies more time to come into compliance with the limitations. Since these dates have since past and the Companies have now come into compliance, the provisions have become obsolete. New Rule 420 is part ofthe Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Program. The federal CAIR program requires the state to develop regulations to reduce NOx and S02 emissions. The proposed rule will result in reduced S02 emissions from EGUs, which will help. reduce the formation ofparticulate
..matter less-than2.5. microns in diameter in Michigan and downwind areas. The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) worked with a number ofstakeholders to develop and adopt this rule. The workgroup included representatives from various industrial, commercial, small business, consumer and environmental groups and associations. The workgroup met several times during 2005 and 2006. SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF THE PROPOSED RULES Rules 401a, 401, 402,404 through 407, and 420

### 0.4. 2005-036 EQ, Staff Statement, dated July 19, 2007.

• Rule 401a contains language adopting definitions previously not addressed in the rules. • Rule 401 revisions address changes in the language regarding the emission ofsulfur dioxide from electric power plants. • Rule 402 revisions address changes in the language regarding the emission ofsulfur dioxide from sources other than electric power plants. • Rule 404 revisions address changes in the language regarding the mission of sulfur dioxide and sulfuric acid mist from sulfuric acid plants. • Rule 405 revisions address changes in the language regarding the emissions from sulfur recovery plants located within Wayne county. • Rule 406 revisions address changes in the language regarding hydrogen sulfide emissions from facilities

**loc,~terl** 

### within W8yne county. • Rule 407 revisions address changes in the language regarding sulfur compound emissions from sources located within Wayne county and not previously specified. • Rule 420 establishes the ability to opt-in to the CAIR S02 program to electric generating sources (EGUs) which are not currently subjecttothe requirements. The remaining requirements for the CAIR S02 shall be met using the Federal Implementation Plan under Part 97, Subparts AAA through HHH. The final rules will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a revision to the SIP. That concludes my statements on the proposed rule revisions. Prepared by: Teresa Walker and Steve Kish July 2, 2007 '

### E.1. 2011-029 EQ, Notice of Public Hearing, dated November 1, 2012. E.2. 2011-029 EQ, Newspaper Publication Affidavits, dated October 1 and 2, 2012, and October 9, 2012, and Newspaper Publication Tear Sheets, dated September 30, 2012, and October 1, 2012. E.3. 2005-036 EQ, Notice of Public Hearing, dated July 19, 2007. E.4. 2005-036 EQ, Comments, dated July 18 and 19, 2007. E.5. 2005-036 EQ, NewspaperAffidavits, dated June 11, 2007, and July 6, 2007. E.6. Notices of Public Comment and Hearing appearing in the December 2, 2013, issue ofthe DEQ Environmental Calendar, regarding removal ofWayne County Ordinance and Variance from SIP.

### E.1. 2011-029 EQ, Notice of Public Hearing, dated November 1, 2012.

I MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING The Michigan Deparlment of Environmental Quality (MPEQ), Air Qualify Division, will conduct a publio comment period and hearing on proposod admlnlslratlvo rules promulgated pursuant to Parl65,

### Air Pollullon Conlrol, of tho Natural Resources and Environmental Proleollon Aol, 1094 PA 451, as amondod (NREPA) for the following rule revisions: (ORR 2011-029 EQ) Parl4. Emission llmitallons and Prohibitions· Sulfur Bearing Compounds. Modify exlsllng language in R 330.1401 (Rule 401), R336.1402 (Rule 402), R336.1404 (Rule 404), R336.1407 (Rule 407), and R336.1420 (Rule 420). There are miner revisions to Rules 401, 402, 404, and 4071o correct deficiencies ldenlilled bythe Unlled States Environmental Protection Agoncy (U.S. EPA). Effective January31, 2008, the Air Quality Divlolon (AQD) promulgated revisions and additions to the Part 4 Rules and submitted them to U.S. EPA as a rovlslon to Michigan's State lmplemenlotion Plan (SIP) under tho foderot Clean Air Acl. Rule 420 will be revised lo address changes that U.S. EPA requested In lha SIP lor tho Clean Air lnterslate Rules. (ORR 2012·017 EQ) Part 9. Emission llmllatlons and Prohlblllons- Mlscollanoous. Modify existing language In R336.1902 (Rule 902); rescind R336.1933 (Rule 933); and propose new rules R 336.1946 (Rulo 946), R336.1949 (Rule 949), and R336.1950 (Rule 950). Rules 902, 946, 949 and 950 aro adopting by rotoronco National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) lor oloctrio aro furnaces, Iron and steel foundries and other non.rerrous foundries. Rula 0331s being rescinded because !hero ore no alfeoted units In tho state.**~** The public hearing will be held on Thursday, Novembor 1, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. In the Lillian Hatcher conference room, Constltullon Hall, 

### 3''floor north, 626 Allegan Street, Lansing, Michigan. Copies of lhe proposed rules (ORR 2011·029 EQ and 2012·017 EQ) con bo downloaded from the Internet through the Office of Rogulatory Relnvonllon at: htlp:h'wiM.mlchlgan.gov/orr. Copies ofthe rules mayalso bo obtained by conlactlng tile Lansing office al: Air Quality Division Michigan Department of Environmental Qualify P.O. Box 30260 Lansing, Michigan 46909·7760 Phono: 617·373-7069

Fax: 617·335-4729 E-Mail: barro1@mlchl9an.gov All Interested persons are Invited to attond and prosont theirvlows. It Is roquested thai allstelemenls be submttled In wrillng for tho hearing record. Anyono unable to attend 

### may submit comments In writing to tho addross above. Written comments must be received by 5:00p.m.. Thursday, Novembor 

### 1. 2012. Persons needing accommodations for orrootlvo participation In tho mooting should contact the Air Quality Division at 517·373·7069 one woek In advanco to roquosl mobility, visual, hearing, or othor asslslanco. This nolle& or public hearing Is given In accordance with Sections 41 and 42 of Michigan's Admlnlslralive Procedures Act, 1969 PA 306, Michigan Compllod Laws (MCL) 24.241 and 24.242. Admlnlslrotlon of the rules Is byauthority conferred on the Directorof the MOEQ bySection 6512 of NREPA, MCL 324.5512. Those rules will becomo efloctlvo Immediatelyalter Ollng with tho Secretary of State.

### E.2. 2011-029 EQ, Newspaper Publication Affidavits, dated October 1 and 2, 2012, and October 9, 2012, and Newspaper Publication Tear Sheets, dated September 30, 2012, and October 1, 2012.

AFFIDAVIT 01' PUBliCATION LSJMEDIA 120 Eastlenawee,lan.sing48919 Stale of Michigan, County of Ingham IN THE MATTER OF; NOTICE DEPTOF ENVIRONMENTAL QUAlllY NOTICE OFPliBUC flf.AA.INO D£PAII:JMtNJ OrfNVIROimnm.t · OlfAliTY AIRQUAl!TYI'lJVISION The Mtclllp.u Crt)'artme-111 ol £ny;r«11MI'lbl QJalft;' (M:(l}, All

**QU~I)'** DMsloo, will t(lll• clv:l 1. p!M",o commMt pet!Qd

**~lid** 1turloo Oflj:!(opMt:d admitll$lllth'f

**~~ p~!t·** 

**~d** Pi!IS!lUll l!tPut$$,All

**J\XM~II** Cotlir«, of !ha

**H~lural** ReUI'Jml bnd

**En'rirOIVIWif~l** Oolng dvfysworn, says lhal h&'sho Is authorized bytho pub:llshetof lallslng State Jourm:ll, lo swear that acertain not/co, acopy of which Is annexed hero to, was pubflshed In tho following pubrteaOOn: rtOIWion Mt, 1m PA ut, 6l AMtMU CAtt.C51) fu

**tll~** (dlo>.'ltr..grvll miJ!Ms: Air Pllllutlrul CQOtf¢1 R<Jit (ORR lOll.OU tQ} PUl4, Etrlur-.11 Llmltati«!S AndPtohrb!t!Ms •S:\llfu1

**Bev!~~g l:~wnds),**  **v.iilbcl~** te· v!Jtoot to R.m.mt

**(~ .COJ~**  nm;.uo2 {R<J!e

**~t)n** R.)JU*'I (Ru!t .WO. RJJ6.1401 (Rule 401), and R»s.WO (Atlle 420), 'JMre ace mklor 1t11JJoM to rli-is 401, (01, (o-J, sM m to c«rntdtfkknclis kfrollfled by the lhllted S!li!U l'nvlrtlltnt;'ll41 holttllon MMty (U.s, U'AJ. (fftttfYl! lanuill)' ll, 20U,

**I~** Air (lllai'(y Dlvlll«'! (o\Qtl) llrOirnll•

**~ted** rtvls.!oru

**~** addi!IMS Ia the Part 4 RtlftS Md SUMiltted

**l~trn** IO U.S. fPA t$ lJ

**rtlisl~** to Mltf'llgiD'! Sla.le

**lmJili>m~IIIUo)rt**

**Pl~l'i** {S.IP) I.IMtr tlre ltdtnl Cltan Air At.t.

**Jtul~** 00Will

**~ r~'l'fwd**  to adt!{uJ

**dur.~~¢$** that US, lPA

**req~~ltd** In tht SIP fN

**I~** ClflrlAlf

**l~ttU!llltRvf~s.** 1. Published In lhe English faJ}gJJage forthe dissemination otgenoral and/or legaJ news, and 2. Has abonfido nst ofpaying customorsor has bo.on publlshed alloast once aweek In tho samo community wlthoutln!euuptlon f01 al roast2years, and 3. Has been established, published and c!rcufated allaast onco aweekwithout lntorrupllon forat/eaStone (1) year fn tho communitywhoro tho flUblfcal/on Is to occur.



## Lan!'ZS~i

# ::"'f{; 10/112012 KELLY PAGE 

### f



# ~·"· **Cf-;lf=',"--------~~-~**



# g~~~crn~t}~;N TO



# ~.~~3'~E**~HIS.....9:\h**



# dlw;,_ m

**~fA** LISA M. SHOOLTZ, NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE! Of· MICHIGAN, COUNlY OFSHIAWASSEE, MY . COMMISSION EXPIRES DECEMBER 12, 2017, ACTING IN THE Counly of Ingham 0001035234·01, 019605 Aft J)OIMIM C«<lroi!MI (OM 2"012·011 [Q)

**Put~.** Vn!Uioo Llmitatkm a,1dPIOhY:IitfOM ·

**Mlst~hnMlU, w~I_IMI~t**  rtv!Jior.s to R ll6.1901,

**(IM~** i02) i!OO R ll&-19ll

**(~Je** 9U); and 01mtllfn ft

**~Js.a~.**
**~** m.l949, Mld; R JU.ISI* (Rules

**~S,** 9U 3J1d 95*}. Rules 901,

**~~S.** 949 Md 9;50 are

**a~tir.g** by ftfUCIKt Nalklflal [flliUIW!

**Sl~llikrch** fo( tlautd®JAll

**P~lallts** (liBWIP.slleteltt.• trJc am

**fum~ces,** !rOll and st«l klund'du and

**ot~1** MMtrrCOS f,Uf\d/lu. JN:e Sill 1$

**btl~lt**ruWlded

**Wu~ H~tt**  .xe t10afttd·

**~~~~lt~lt\tfltstltt,** Ihi

**p~bll; ~~In;**  v.tll bt

**~~Jlf**on

**It.£lf~y.** N9'Yembtt I, 2"0l2 at

**10:~1;1** o,m. In

**~** tQtan llal(/ltt ("(lnfucnto rOM\ Ccmtllvtfcl'l H"'!!, Jrd 8®roNtlt, HS

**Alit~** Stlu.t, lwl<1j),

**Mid~**an. C,.,p!u C<f the prOj)Osed rules WI bt

**41-~wn•** lo&dedff«ntht!nltfllclat:htlp.://

**I'MW.mltN~;lr;ov/&w/~!la~rtM<Irv!eW**

**llrp~lolli~Wl-<;Oi'.** 'fflelO

**ru~** C¥1 a!JO

**~** lkwr:loarkd from

**th~** lrl!trr.U tlvo!IQb tl!4 Olllet ot

**Rtg~kltwy** lltlnvenllon at

**http;//wwN.mlchl~n.gw/orr.** C®lnollht

**ru!umay~IJohttOt~d** by«ttlhetfno lfle lamlnaolf!<eat: AltQuslityPMOO\

**Mkhr~Olp.a.tmefi!Of**

**£n-vi.o0Mitnl~l** Q\la.lit)'

**P.O.~JOl6Q** lanslil9-

**!.!lth~M .CS5CN1~0** 

**l'~nt:5JN7N0~9** rax.:SIH.js-4129' All ln!uesltd pmoM

**~4 lmlt~d**  to

**att~nd** and

**PI'~Hnt** tht"\1tws. Ills

**ttq~sttd** that 111

**ilatem~lb** be $ubm11ttd In Wilting f« the

**hwf~** mud.

**NIYMIInaltl~** toa.ttend may submfl

**c~nts** h Wilting to the .!d• dren al»'lt. Vlritten cemtnti\U m\.151 Jxo tt· cefvN by $:00 PJII., nuuday,

**Jl.welfl~tr** 1. JCU, Ptuom

**n«<in~ a.«~mo~tlo-ns**  for tlftc· ll;'t

**wl~atlon** L1 the

**m~etfnp** shOV!d coo·

**l~tt** L'le Alt QttaJitt D;&;!«l at

**m-37N~** 

## ..........

# ·-

**-~----··**

# ..

**······-~**

## _ 

# ..........

**~.**

### E.2. 2011-029 EQ, Newspaper Publication Affidavits, dated October 1 and 2, 2012, and October 9, 2012, and Newspaper Publication Tear Sheets, dated September 30, 2012, and October 1, 2012.

**uat,he&t~,«Clhi:t**

### e ..

**ur!i::~r.** """'''To:' this n(){ke o( publ!c

**ht~r!ng** b

**fll'v~n** L1 at•

**~.Into** With Sect1oos U

**~nd** 42: ofM!ehl· Oi!ll'S Adrnltll$trbi1VI J'r«:tdvru Ad.,

**l~~** PA 30$, u uneOOed. berng S«tlons 2tW aod .zun(;If lht Mlthlg:.n Comp(fed lam, Admh'llstraUon ol lhe rvf(!.l. Is by alt..hQtlty C(Jafetted WI

**t~o** Oltet!(!r olthe Off/by

**s~c·**

**t~sm~r** Ad m and E>:ecl!llvt Ord« No. 2011•1.

**Thl~t** rufttwillbt(omee:lftcllvc

**lmn-~la·** lyllf!u

**n~tr~~**wtlh th•swot.uyolState. tsJtolfm Jctt,nou

### E.2. 2011-029 EQ, Newspaper Publication Affidavits, dated October 1 and 2, 2012, and October 9, 2012, and Newspaper Publication Tear Sheets, dated September 30, 2012, and October 1, 2012.

### E.2. 2011-029 EQ, Newspaper Publication Affidavits, dated October 1 and 2, 2012, and October 9, 2012, and Newspaper Publication Tear Sheets, dated September 30, 2012, and October 1, 2012.


# The Mining Journal

UpperMichigan's Largos! DallyNewspaper 249 W. Washington Sl., P.O. Oox 430, Morquollo, Mlch/gan49966. Phone (906)228·2500. Fax (906)226·3273 AfFIDAVIT OfPUBLICAT/ON STATe OF MICHIGAN
Forlhe Counlyof MARQU/lTTE In /ho mailerof: Nollceof Public Herulng Mrctdgan Oopar1monl ofEnvlronmonlal Quality NrQuaUly Division Cos/; $130.50
Slate of MICHIGAN, C<>unlyorMarquello ss. GERALD NfWHOUSE being dulyS\Vom, says that he Is CIRCULATION MANAGER or THE MINING JOURNAL nnowspai>orpublished andcirculated In sakicounty and other.vise quafified aC<:<>r<l/ng /o Supreme Court Rule; /hal annoxed llnrolofs aprintedoopyora nollcowhich was pubJfshnd In said newspaperon tha following da!o, or dates, to-wit Oc/ober 1, 2012



# o1r£.~-g1v,~~ Subscribed amf &.vom lo before me lhls 1s1 dayofOctober, 2012.


# ,_u,mrr >{Aw;( AMYl.BON ' · Nolaty Pubflo ror MarqueUe Counfy, Mlchtgan Acllogln lho CountyolMarquelfo My commission expires: July 3. 2013 AFFIDAVIT OfPUBLICATION 

## !UCI:fVW



# ocr 4 lOll Alfl QUAUryDIV.

### E.2. 2011-029 EQ, Newspaper Publication Affidavits, dated October 1 and 2, 2012, and October 9, 2012, and Newspaper Publication Tear Sheets, dated September 30, 2012, and October 1, 2012.

### E.3. 2005-036 EQ, Notice of Public Hearing, dated July 19, 2007.

JENN!FEO M.GMNHOLM <;.{:-'IGfii:OA I'VOUC IIEA!UNG RECORD SrhTF.or MICJliOAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVJiiONMEN1AL QUALfTY LnlSih'<l
NO

**TIC~** OF PUBLIC HEARING DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION 

# DE~ STF.VEN E, CHI!$TF-_A

**o-~<:C1Cil**

The Michigan Deparlmcnf ofenvlronmenlel Quamy (DEQ), AirQualil>• 0/vlslon,wJII conduct a publkIHmring on proposed admlnfslreUve ruins promulga!od pursuant to

**P~r155,** AirPollulion ConlroJ, of!ho Natural Resources and Environmenlal Proleotlon Act, 1094 PA451, as amended (Acl451): R336.1401, R336.1401u, R336.1402, R336.1404/o R 336.1407, and R336.1420 (Rules 401, 401a, 402, 404·407, and 420). This ru!emaklog 

### wm amendR.ules 401 to 407 addressing sulfurdioxldo (S02) cmf!ted In Wayne Counry. lnad'dJI/on, !he DEQ Is proposing loadd Rule 420 fo roduco lwnspotted omissions of S02 from elechlc gonora:tinQ units Hs part ofthe Clean Air ln!Qrstale Rule federal reqtJ/remonts. The public hoalino wilf lJe held on July 19,2007, el 10:00

### a.m., In lha Brake Conference Room, Consll!ullon Hnll, Alrlum Soulh, 525 WestAllegan Sireel, Lansing, Michigan. Copies ofth_e propo;;ud w!_es (SOAHH2005-036IEQ) can Qo

**down~oaded** fr<.lftl tho lnlemot.at:
**hllp:/Awm.mlchlgan.gov/deqnfl~** These ru!os can also be dawn!oadad from fua

**lnt~;~rnollhrough** the Slate Office ofAdmlnlsfmlive Hearings and Rules at **htlp;/1\W.'w.mlch~gan.gov/orr.** Cop!es Qf tho rules may

**ol~o** be oblalnod byconlacUng /he Lansing of!lco al: Air Quanly Division Michigan Depatlmenl ofEnvlronmenlal Quolily P.O. Box 30260 Lansing, Mlch!gan48909·7760" Phone: 617·373-7045 Fax: 517·241-7499 E·Mall: halbelsm@Michlgan.gov All Jnleresled parsons are lnvllod loa/lendand prosonl their views. Ills roquasled thai all sla/emenls ba submltled in \vrlling for the hearing rocord. Anyone unab!Q loallend maysubmll commenls Inwrillng to lhQ address above. Written commenfs musl be received by5:00p.m. on July 19, 2007. Persons needing aocommodaUons for effoclive partlclpatfon In the mocting should contact

**U1~** Air Quamy Division al517-373·7045 one week In advance to request mobR!ty, visual, hearing, or olher asslsltmce. This notice ofpublic hearing Is given In accordanCe wllh Seol!ons 41 and 42 of Michigan's Admlnls!ratlve Procedures Acl, 1969 PA 306, as amended, being Sec/Ions 24.241 and 24.242 of/he Michigan COmpllorl Lows. Admlnlslrallon oflho rules Is byaulhorlty conferred on lho Dlreclorof lho DEQ bySec/Ions 5503 and 5512 ofAc/451, baing Seollons 324.5503 and 324.5512 of/he M/ciJigap COmplied Lawc, ami Execu/ive Order1095-10. These rules will become offecllve lmmedlalolyaflerfiling wllh /he Seoreler1of Slale.



# A:'~~ **~:;;2** G. Vinson flellwig, Chlof

Air Qualify DMslon UOS-036-EQ
**tC~·iSTllVfrOUH.I,lt**•626Yif$TAttt(V.Il&JOEET•P.O.

**COX~)((,~**•lAit'llii\'O,MICHIGAN0!lQ).17{¢

**lll'l'h¥ffirll~"-~·~~v•** (.SIIJ:l7Hm PAGE-1

### E.4. 2005-036 EO, Comments, dated July 18 and 19,2007.

ASPHALT

PAVEMENT 

### Assoc!A1'fON O> 

### IY!JCfl/GAN

Mr. G, VInson Hcrtwlg, Chief MDEQ-AQD Consutotion Hall, 3rdFloor North 526WeslAllegan P.o. aox: 30260 lansing, Ml 48909 PUDLIO HL'AR.f!{G f\I:C:ORD

A,JOHN DECSRY 1JJ.E. BXECUT'I'o'J.i DmP.crQR

Ru; ..**C',mm(;':-Jt~** on**Propo~cd Ri.Jles.200S:O~jEQ** **D~ar** Mr.**H~lf1vlg:** ANDMW C. Scmnor SeCRET MY/TRJMsumiR ClWU.ES E.MILLS1P.B, DfRECl'Oll. Op HNOJNilDR.INO

/hank }'Oil forthe Opportunity lo l:Omrnenl on ihe proposed rules for sulfurdloxldo (SO)) that Will effect hot mixasphalt**p~anls** (HMA)ofi9te:tlng In Woyoo County,**M!chi~an,** wh!ch aro rop:osenltd by Uls Asphalt Pavemonl Association of Mlchlj}a.n (APAM). APAM has sovllral ocmcerns regarding tho language tn lhe rule and how It would effecl AF!NII's members opc:ra\ln,g In Way/"10 County. JIIS; our beJ;ef**lho~** UJiless thosa Issues are rcisclved, It-VIlli noedlessfy put**mem~ers ~~**  a C>:m;petmva d/sadvanlaga lo members oporaUng ou\sl::ie \o\'ayne County. In gcmm:ll, II appears tha ru!o was wrnten to address boilera ratllor than avariety ol rval firing processos fnc!uOmg, butnot l!mlio:l.lo, aggreg?ltt dryers. Th!sls most reac;IUy evident In PfOJXlsed Rula**~02,** rabte .43 and Rvl& 407 lo whrc.h lha SOt omission concenlrellons aro spP.cified *vs. cMe.cledlo 50% twc:ess sfr:Wh!le 60% excess alr Is an.appropJia!e.r.oTreoUon fM
.. a Mllor; Ills not pppropfln!O (¢r an aggregate dryor. Tho {U'flount of alt tequtred to operate an cggregale dryer Is not (:lapertdr:nl on !he uir**roqulr~d** ror proper combusUon, but on the air te:quYed to pfop-oriy dl)' and heat lho pTOducl. It has bcon proven lhat HMA plnn!s lnhE!f&nlty control**so~** th:ough adsorpll0!1 ofewrega(a dust and**CO!fi)~Uon** Of that SO,rladen duat In lhe plant's fabric nlt(lr e:ol!oclor. Th!s pf<>Ce!s is sfmifar to, but has alowerefficlancy than, a lime fn}e.::llon syslem usod ror

### sol con!fo! o;l a power**p~::mt** ror air permi!Ung purfX!sos, S02. con!f(l/ efflc/enc.fos of<13% when runnlnl) mtxes confaln!ng n:n:)'c!ed asphatt pro:iuota and 72% when ruhn!ng vlrgln**aggregal~** mixes haw!**b~('n** astabllshed. However, durlr{J recent permll negoUaUons, tho MDEO-AQD slaffwore**unwll~ng** lo cons!der !he proven, lnhcront S0-2 control provldod by HMA plants when considet!ng U1o proposed exemp!lon provided by Rule 402(6Xb), bocauso "D conlto/device was no!**ln$/8/lod.~** APAM members have bgcn &:Omawhal perploxed by this posi!!on, as bnlh tho power plan! a.nd lhl) HIM plant inslnU a fabtk: filter col!!:clor to**c.apt~.n<J** the adsotbed SO,. At tho time of!he permit ne.gollations, APAM members**and'fvfDCQ~AQO'sta·wwere** nogolt3!1ng will\ regard tO lh€state**lhlp!omont~tcon** Plah fangvage fn the exlsling Wayne Counl)i Ordinance: howevet, the**languug~** pJopos;tild f¢1 Rule <102 {6)(b)**lsldentlc~l** to lhe**langoa~** In**t~i'll** ordinenc.e. APAM**he~>** several suggesUons our marnbers believe wo!l.d ser\'o (o clarlf)• the**prop::~sed** JUles.
Asi'J-[AL't PAYUMENTAsSOCIATION OFMICHIGAN 2931Atrium

### nm ..**~** I Suite: 202 1**Oket~lO$,** htichlt2-n**~886.4 517-32l~7MO**  • 1-800-292-5939 •517-3?.3--65-05 Pu: wwv:.:tpa·ln1.org

# . 't'(l". 

### E.4. 2005-036 EQ, Comments, dated July 18 and 19, 2007.

f.1r. G. Vinson

**H~l!w1g** Page 2 July 18, 2007 f>UDLIC ll"t:AiiiNG RECOnO

1.

**~~~ud()** rccyctcd

**u~cd** oil In Table 43. Rufe 402 a!I p.art of lho. row for •·crada /Jnd liea1y oil AW.. 

### 4. 6, & 6." 'rhls would help to Clarift Um! the rnax!tnurn su!fUI content {Qf RUO Is con-sfslanlfor thaiol oils No. 4-6 a\1.0%. 2. Revise thO w-ord!ng fn Rule 402 (Q)(b) lo allow for prcco:;sos !hal lnhtuently oonlto! S01 to takfl advanfege of lhlS oxe:nplion if thoy so Ch:-J-ose. For thQ

**fore~eeab!a** future, APAM mt'lmb(lfSv/.11J.l!<oly ba 2.b!O lo opera!ft econom!callyviilh fue,ls at amnx!mum 5ulf(Jfetmlent of 1.0% Mid lha exemplion provided bysubrulo (6)(b) will b6 urmecessary tor mo!lt members. H:m-ever, t!S fuel wsls Incre-ase, APAM mombars m:;;yvt.sh to lncteaso the flcx1bll1ty In the fuels !he:y are authorized to burn by apjl!yiwd for p.crmlls to move from 'fab!o 43 to a s!lo·spe.:::Jficfimlt fuel !lml!, based on HMAplata's Inherent $0}control.

**~.** APAM

**belJ.(J\'~s:** tho concontrnUon l!stcd 

### rn Ru!e 40'l(a) shvuld 00 ra1snd to 400 parts per rn'll'on (ppm) cvMii>lt:!nLwilh tho conconL•atlon Jfslod for ''Cruda tmd fJewy o!lNos. 4, 5, & (J'

**i~** TaJ!e _ .. 

### q. The current.

**CO[l~ef!l!alto~** <>f

**J~O** pp-m

**app~~r~**_to bs a rcmn.Uil! from !he;

**cl~** Wayne CounlJ' Ordinance In which the maxlmtW\ sulfur content In 'critde ami

**Jwrwyo/r-\·:~13** rsted os- 0.7%. As lhe fuel sulfur Hm!t ln.Ta'Jie43 hM been ralsod {o 1.0%, the concentmlton tlmU In sulmllo (n) shou:d also bo !ncrcaslld. The ooncenl(atlofl& for sulrurlo acld (lfld

**~ulrtJr** ttl:>xkie sOOukJ also be adjusted conslslonUywith lho ne·.v$01OQ:tcenlr.!llbn. 4. APAM recommends p;ovlslons be adde-d to R;ula <tO?(a) to Go! a

**s!le·.::opectfi~** fval sulfur limit as a part of apermit rovlow, rather !Mn a

**st~ck** gas conccntratton

**corre~ted** to 50% excess air. Thls s!!c·tpecinc sutlur llm!l woul:t be based on the SOt control inherent lnlhe

**pro~e-ss,** end woukt tG-sutt In a shnplor comp!kmca dete1minaUoo for both the MUEQ·AQD and APAM members. Thank you again fot the opp.ottunUy to conmlenl onlhi;!SO proposed re{lulat!ona.

**Plefis~** contar.-t me ot our environment consu!lailt, Mr. Da\1d Ycnochko or Fishb-eck. Thompson, Carr & Huber, lno. (rTG&H) al24B·324·2121 lfYoll,havetmy questions tegatdir.glhose Co')mmenl&. Rcspec:tU!Jy, 

# A.(f;{!:!:?__- Execull\•a Dlrector

**Aspha!tPavt~ment**Assoclalbn of M.!clllgan 517·323-7800 cc: Mr. Oav!d M. Ytm(t:::hko, P.E.- FTC&.H

### E.4. 2005-036 EQ, Comments, dated July 

### 18 and 19, 2007.

PUOUO.!ISAR-!NO liECORD UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5



### TeresaWAlker AirQuaJilyDivision 17 WESTJACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604·3590 

### JUL· L,9 2007 ·
Michigon Department ofEnvironmental Quality P.O. Box 30260 L•nslng, Michigan 48909-7760 DearMs. Walker: (AR-18J)

**Th:~nk**you for the opporf1mj(y

**fo.conune;~\-Oll 11~**  **propor.~:ltegulillions** to address the C!onn Air. Jnlcrstn!e Rule (CAlR) StateImplementationPlan (SIP) requirements, We appreciate this oppoliunit)' attd the 1ili1cyou have taken to discuss theseproposedrcguln!ions withus. We have found these diseu::siOJJS use-ful to provide ouropinions as well as gain nbeUerundCistanding of theprovisions found in the proposed rcgulalions, RegioJl 5mayhavendUiUonol comments alterrovfowing therevised langungc nnd lhe supplementaltetiU1ieal support nullcrinls which havenotyet been submitled forreview. We look forwa{d to conlilming ·working wHh theMkhig_an Department ofEnvirotuucntal Qualily towards afully opprovt1bleCAmSIP for U1e Stale ofMichigan, Ifyou hflVC A.h)'questions concellling lhe Region's comments,ple.DSefeel free to contact me. Siucetcly,



# o-~~~~ Douglas Aburru10 Bnvitorunonlal Engineer CritcrinPollutant Section

### E.4. 2005-036 EQ, Comments, dated July 18 and 19, 2007.

PVfll.tC ftEAll.IIIO ttECORO
Comme.nts on Miclllgan CAIRS02

**Rc.gul;ltion.~** 1. Rule 4?.0(l)(b) defines "CAIRsulfurdioxide permit". Webelieve U1'ii!tl1is shouldbe ''CAmpcm1it" which is alreadydefined in40 CFR 97.202•. Since you nre adopting 1l1e provisions of40 Cfi'R97.202 it is unnecessary for }'OU lo include ti.Jis de.finilion. We recommend you deJ.IcRulc420(1)(b). 2. Rule 420(1)(c) defines "Michigllll EGUs11
, Webelievethis definition is aJs:o not

**nt..'CC~$i!I)'**and should be llclelcd, 3. Rule 420(2)(b) cunenllyadopts tht:S02opt·fllprovisions40 CFR 9"/,281



### ~288, this should beexpandedto include40CFR 97.280-288. 4. Rule420(2)(b) should nlso beexpanded to includethepcnnittingCA1RS02pcrmitling requircnleufs found by udopling40 CER..97,Z20·Z2·t



### Th\~ will bG.used in Rule 420{3).
. . . . . . . . . 

# . 5. Rule 42.0(3-)readS", "MichiganEOUs arerequired lo apply for and receive aCAIR sulfur dioxidepcnnil.nThls should be



### ~hanged to,



### '~flach CATR S02sourceJ flS defined In 40 CFR97.202, is required !Oapply for aCAIRpenni! in accordancowi!h40 CFR97.220· 224. 11 This change will beconsistent wilh conuncnls 1 12, 3 and4.

PAOE tol

### E.5. 2005-036 EQ, NewspaperAffidavits, dated June 11, 2007, and July 6, 2007.

MARQllliTTF.MINING JOURNAL

·'' ' i ••••

### E.5. 2005-036 EQ, NewspaperAffidavits, dated June 11, 2007, and July 6, 2007.

AFFIDAVIT OFPUBLICATION COMMUNITYNEWSPAPERS, INC. 120 B. Lenawee. loosing,

### Ml48919 SlateofMichigan1 CountyQflngham PUliLIO HEAR/NO. RECORD


# I' INTHEMA'J1'ER OF: NOTICE



# ~., MIC!iJOANDEPTOl1ENVIR. QUALITY ANNLYON Bchl"gduly

**sworn~** says-thathe/sheis authorized bylhapublishor-ofL:msing cerinin

**n~tice**



### 1 ncopyofwhich Js amloxcd hereto; waspub1lshe-d in lhe 1. Published 1n theEnglishJongungcfor rhcdi'ssomiuQtiOn of 2. HRs abontldclist(){payingcustomers orhitsbeen pulblishe<l samecommunltywllhout fnterru_plion fornlleas! 2reors, end 3. 

### Hnsbeencstablished1published and circuhl!ed ?.( Ieos! once ll forat leastone (1} yenrin thecomnmJJity

**wh~re**thepublication
. LANSINGSTATEJOURNAL

SUBSCRU3EDAND SWORNTO BBFORB MilTfllS 6TH DAY OFJULY, 2007 CARRI!lA. SAVAGI! NOT

### MYPUBUC, Sl'A'fl!OFMICHIGAN, COUNTYOFEATON MY COMMISSIONEXPIRES: SEPTEMBER4, 2007 ACl1NO lN'fBl!COUNTYOF EATON LSI· 6.8 200S.03tjl.lQ **~**

## ....PUBUC 1-!EA.?JNG RECORD

Co- ofOald.nd STATE

OF MIO!!GAN, l ss. -·--··**E{J:t.Mi~[~jg_L._** ..... -bcin;, <My w;orn,

Cepose :and say:s that I am l.be

__ ..Le,l

**:Rep.·-·~·**____ of

THE

OAKLA,'ID PRESS ,anewspoperpriated>nd cim:lalal

dol1y

in Ool:land Co<m!y, Miohigan .,d 62l: l held snob **~<>~~the**

publica.ti® of:tllenotice he::etci 2.0.0¢Xed;

that a c.otr.oeof

**----····-····~··----** ... - ... ·--·-·-- -·----····------Public

**Notic~-·······----.:..--** .. ..:..-:of

which the :annexed notice is .2tlnle

**copy~** V.?.S published in the

saidmhND J>RESS

..... _. ____ ........... --. _ .

···--·---···- jmmydbte1yp:cccding.the

/J;of

.... _ .. **tlmthe~o:e4prmtedcopyofs::bd.ti.O'tice**

was

ta.l:en from til< said

**newspa~. "That~'~,;,**  of

..

r·. "o7

pubhc:UHJD

**o~** said aot:ce v.-er I.U/.l.e.... **.f.~--** ... - .....

·---- ..

·-·--. ----- ...........

**~--** .............. _[""

_____ _

ami further dc:pOtlcnt

**~yetb.** no · **~if** f)/)} **s!)~t;;i-~d;.~~-;·~b"-;;:e is·:~:Ia:~;f**  **:::::=:==:::::::=:::::~~20::.::::::·** NOTARY ?UBUC, OA.K:.AND".COUNIY. MICHIGAN **200~Zt;EQ. "'"llWI.~**  **~r.Vl.::'. ~~"'::lJ~~g:.~W**  **vrc::t.17.11SS'l0~ tx""r.ES}.b:c~.**  3}Ge o4. ,;,... **~C;t;**
0

d'

**~AGE.!!** m (}1 N 0 0 (}1 ' 0 w Ol m 0 z **~** '0 Jj) '0 (!) **~ ~**  a: Jj) < ;::;: (/) 0. Jj) ro 0. c.... c: "' (!) **~ ~**  N 0 0 -.J Jj) "' 0. c.... c: -< Ol N 0 0 -.J

### E.6. Notices of Public Comment and Hearing appearing in the December 2, 2013, issue ofthe DEQ Environmental Calendar, regarding removal ofWayne County Ordinance and Variance from SIP.

**-----~.-·** 

# ENVIRONMENTAL. CALENDAR

**~**

## g_ecember2, 2_013

JANUARY2, 20H

JANUARY 2, 2014

JANUARY G, 2014 1:00p.m.

JANUARY 10, 2014 MiJ!ikin, Plant Manaaer, and Gary Brewar, Plant

**/.,.!~ag~r.**432 He>asbacl; Road, Mason, Michigan 49&54. Writen

**comm~rli.s** on the draftROP, ora re-questte> hold a p<Jblic h;:aring, ar.;

**to~** submitl;:d lo Brian Culham, Michigan DepartmentofEnvlronrnenl31 OL.•a!ity, Air Quality Di-.1sion, lansing DistrictOffic;:,

**Co:~stitution** Hall, P.O. Sox 30242, 525

**W~l Ni~gan,**  lansing, J..·lichigan 4990:1, or lfia

**&-rna~** to

**e-u~amO@mkhban.oov**byJanuary2, 2014. The Decision-makerfor the

**p~nni:** is J..lichael F. Mc-Clellan, L3nsing 01:-lrictSupervisor. If

**requ;o.st~d**in writing byJanu3ry 2, 2014, apublic hearing rr.ay !>£>sche-duled.

**ln~orm.>tion** Con!J.ct: Bri3n Culham, ,Aj;

**Ou.a.J~y** Dl\ision, wlhamb@michig:m.qovor 517-2il4-e633. DEADLINE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING SUBMmALTO EPA OF WITHDRAWAl OF WAYNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIVISION SULFUR DIOXIDE RUlES FROM THE STATE IMPlEMENTAnON PlAN. The Air Ouali:y Division

### v.mhold apublic rommentperiod

**s~,;ldng** input on re••ising the

**S~t;: lmp!emen~tion**  P!:m to refl;oct the \\1thdr,;,wal ofrules

**of.~tn.;.!t;** submi:ted by the

**Wayn~** County D.::prtr.ento:

**H;a~th.** Air Quality thnagementDivi:sicn in

**th~ir 1~59**  focal ordin.lnces, Article VI,

**S~cjon** 6.3 .:.s

**amend~d** by the TQ:91 v.;riance, The AirQuality Division h.?.s previouslypron1u!gated rule3 thatrep!a:;;,; the Wayne County Oep3rtmentofHealth, Air Quality !..la.nagement Oi-Jision rules and h,;!dpublic comn;ent on those rul,;s and !heir in::fusion inthe S:ate

**fmp~~men:atbn** P/Jn. This publb commen: addresses only the materofr.;:m-ov.>J ofth;Wayne Countt

**Oepartrt~nt** ofHealth, NrOuali:y

**!..!Jnagem~nt** Division

**rul~** from tfH! Sl.3:e tmp!ementation Pla.n. This public comment peri:xl me-::s the pub!io participajon require.ments for a

**SIJ~e 1m~** em-entation Pla.n submit-.aL r; re.qu-.st-=d by

**J~uary** 2. 2lll4, ahearing w:H beheld on JanuarJ6, 2014 (se-i! Janu.lf'/6, 2:l14, listing in this

**c;;.!~n~hr}.** V.'rf:!en ccmtr.-='nt;; an-d a re.ques!_ta ho!d .1 pubEc hearing aro? to t-i! subrnill€dlo CJri DeBruler, MichJasn 0-!!partme-ntofEnvironmenb(Ouality, Air QualitY Ohisfon, P.O. Be>: 30260, lansing, 1;.\ichigan 49Gtld-77{10 or

**de-brulerc:':imichigan.o~v.** lnformatio."l Conllc!: Tr,acey McDonald, AirOuali:y

**Di•'is~:m,** mcdonald':<5'mich:gan.qo\'Or 517-284-6756. DEADUNE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING CENTRAL SANITARY lANDFill, PIERSON, MONTCALM COUNTY, (SRN: N2804), foTthe draft tEnE-l\'.11 ofa Renewab!e Op.era:ing Permit (RO?J forthe operation ofa municfpJI sclid waste landfilL The draftpermit ls int;:nded to s.1mplity andchrify the facii1fs app!iCJ.b!e requireme."l:S and will notresult in any airemission changes at

**th~** sta•jonary source. The RO? public oo!iO? docuinenls can be\'i;:wed al m.w.d€o.s.tale.mi.u=/aps..The

**r~sponsib!e** official ofthe statiomry

**so>.~r-c:e** isTodd H.>rfand, Republic

**Ser.~ces.** 21545West CannonsyiJ!e Road, Pk-rsoo. Michigzm 4£>33fi.

**~'fritlen**romments on th;: draftROP, orar-=quest to hold apubiJ.:: hearinJ, are to be subrnited to Dave Mcxgan, Mi-c:higJ.n Department ofEnvironmental Oualitj.Air QualitjOMsicn, Grand Rapids District 0:'5·:-e. 3-50 Ot-.awa Avenue NW. Urlt 10, Grand Rapids, Michigan 4B503, orvi.;

**~-mJil** to mormnrl"J.'[-mi·'higan Q?YbyJ..;.nu.lrf2, 2J14. The

**Oe<:isicr,.m3k~r** fur thepemill i.;. Hef:li Ho!!enb,;.ch, Grand Rapids DiHric<. SuperY.sor. If

**r~quest<!d**in writir,J by January 2, 2014 a puOEchearing mJy be scheduled.lnfom'I-J!ion Contact DavE'Morgan, AirOuJrity Dl<.ision moroa.nd2@michioan.go\'or

**616-356-0:JO~.** TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED PUBUC HEARJNG REGARDING SUBMmALTO EPA OF WITHDRAWAl OF WAYNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, AIR QUAUTY MANAGEMENT DMSION SULFUR DIOXJDE RULES FROM THE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PlAN.TheJJr Qu.;.!ity Divi=:bn v.ill. if

**Je-ques~ed,** hofd a publichearir.a seeking inputonrevisind the Sta:e lmplemMiation Pl:on to re!lec<. the

**\\~lhdrawal** ofrules origina!!y submf:te-d by the:

**W~yne** Coun!y Department ofHealth, AirOuarrtyMJn.3gemen: Di\1sioo intheir

**IQC~** loc.JI ordinJ.nces. Article VI,

**S~c!ion** 6.3 .3S

**Jm~ded** by the lf/81

**varian~.** This hearing is. .. m oppon:unitjfor !he publicto !!):press supPJrtfor orconO?ms .;boutthe remo'.'al ofthese rules from

**th~** Stale

**lmp!eme~lion** Pla.n. This public Maring perio:l meets lhepublic par"Jdpation requirements fvr a State lmp!eme:ntation P!Jn submi:t.ll. Ifro:queste:l byJanull)'2,2014, a public hearing willbe held in the Claud Erickson

**Confer~nce** Room, Cons!i:ution Hall, ?°FloorSotr.h Tower, 525

**VV~st** A11egan StrEet, lansing, Mlchig.lll on Janua_ry 6, 2014, from 1:0[} p.m. t-o 2:30p.m.

**Thos~** intero;ste-:1 may contact the Air Quality DNlslon a.t517-284-6740 afterJ..;.nuary 2. 20t4,to

**dr:tamlin~** ifa he.>ling was requested andwi!! be hekl. lnfo1Tl13tion Contact TraceyMcDonald, Air Quality DiVision,

**mcdonaldl~m!ch:oJn.oov** or5[7·284-6756. DRAFT 2014 CLEAN WATER ACT SECTIONS 303(d), 305(b}, AND 3141NTEGRATED REPORT. The Michig..tn

**~pa.rtment** ofEmir.:mmental Oualitt {MDEO}, Water

**R~sources** o;vislon eNRD), is

**ao~eptili;i** v.ritten romments

**~:"l'i£:<!n** De:::.=mber2, 2013, and

**anuJ_ry** 10, 2014, on the dr.>ft W.>tE:f 12

### F.1. 2011-029 EO, Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approval. F.2. 2005-036 EO, Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approval. F.3. Combined Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approval.

### F.1. 2011-029 EQ, Strikethrougb bold version as submitted for approval.

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITYDIVISION AIRPOLLUTION CONTRDL PART 4. EMISSIONLIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS-SULFURBEARING COMPOUNDS Filed with the SecretaryofState on Theise rules becomes effective immediately upon filing with the Secretary ofState unless adopted under sections 33, 44, or45a(6) of 1969 PA 306. Rules adopted underthese sections become effective 7 days after filing with the Secretary ofState. (Byauthorityconferred on the directorofenvironmental quality bysections 5503 and 5512 of 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.5503 and 324.5512, and Executive Reorganization Order Neoumbers 1995-1-816, MCL 324.99903, 2009-31, MCL324.99919 and 2011-1, MCL 324. 99921)

R 336.1401, R 336.1401a, R 336.1402, R 336.1407 and R 336.1420 oftheMichigan Administrath•e Code are amended, to read as follows: R 336.1401 Emission ofsulfur dioxide fi·om power plants.

Rule 40 I. (I) In 

### apowerplant, it is unlawflll fol'

### aperson to burn fuel that does not complywiththe sulf\Jr- . content limitation oftable 41 or which, when burned, results in sulfur dioxide (S02) emissions exceeding an equivalent emission rate as shown in table41. Ina powerplant located in Wayne county, it is unlawful for a person to b1m1 fuel that does not complywith the sulfur content limitation oftable 42 and unlawful to cause orpermit a discharge into the atmosphere from fuel-burning equipment sulfur dieKifle 

### S02 in excess ofthe Sll!fuH!i6*We-S02 concentration limit shown in table 42.

(2) Tables 41 and 42 readas follows: TABLE41 Fue and lfi

**S~l** .,<hmade 

### S02 eEm•sswn lL. . f, fuel-& mutatwns or 

### p m:eflt- ower Plants Maximum 

### EquivalenteEmission rRates aAverage Parts permMillion by vVolume Pounds ofsalfur dial<ide 

### S02 Plant Capacity<•) sSulfur (ppmv)eComctedto 50% permMillion Btu ofhlleat eContent in eExcessaAifL'l ilnputl<l fFuel(b.<) Solid fFueJl'i Liquid fFueJl'l SolidfFueJl'i Liquid (Percent by (12,000 Btllflb) (18,000 Btu/lb) (12,000 fFueJ<'l wWeight) Btu/lb) (18,000 Btu/!b) 0-500,000 lbs sSteam per 1.5 890 630 2.5 1.67 hHour

**~Plant** eCapacity Greater than 500,000 lbs 1.0 590 420 1.67 

### I.II sSteamperhllourpPlant eCapacit:y (a) Thetotal steam production capacityofall coal- and oil-buming equipment in a powerplant as ofAugust 17, 1971. (b) "Maximum average sulfur content in fuel" means the average sulfur content in all fuels burned at any I tiroe in a powerplant. The sulfur content shall be calculated on the basis of'l2;000·'Btu·per-pound for solid fuels and"l8,000 Btu perpound for liquid fuels. Th&<leterminatie&<>fsalfur eentent (pereent by weight) effuel shall be eatTiea eHt 

### iH aeeeraan<*Wi'c e te the 8 

# ""'*' (c) Solid fuels include both pulverized coal and all othercoal. (d) Liquid fuels include distillate oil (No. I and No.2),heavy oil (No.4, No.5, and No.6), and cmde oil.

### F.1. 2011-029,EQ,.Strike\hrough bold version..as. submitted for approval. (e) A person shall sample, analyze, calculate, and record for each day ofoperation for each unit at the power plant, the sulfurcontentofthe fuel combusted orthe fuel's equivalent SO,emission rate in accordance with as-fired fuel sampling and analysis procedures found in appendix A of40 CFRpart 60; in particular the "Standat·d Test Methods for Sulfur in Petroleum Products:" ASTMDl29-0l, D1266-98, orD1552-0l and the "Standard Test Methods forTotal Sulfur in the Analysis ofCoal and Coke:" ASTMD3177-89 orD4239-02; as referenced in 40 C.F;R. part·60;17, adopted by reffl'ence in R 336.1802a. Records shall be kept, including the identification ofthepower plant, days ofoperation, and maximum sulfurcontent offuel combusted for each day ofoperation. Records shall be maintained on site for 5years and submitted to the department upon written request. TABLE 42 Fuel and sulfur 8imd8e-S02 

### eConcentration !Limitations for fuel-burning-e<JHipmenf-Power Plants !Located in Wayne eCounty Maximum wWeightpPercent 

### S02

### ppmv 

### eEmission FRates e-Corrected Fuel !Type sSulfur eContent in 1Fuel1' & bl 

### to 50% eExcess aAir (b) 

### !Limitations for fFuel-aBuming eEquipment

------ 

### Pulverized eCoal 1.00 550 Other eCoal 0.75 420

- 

### DistillateeOilNos. I & 2 0.30 120 Used eOil 1.00 3001" 

### .Cmde and hHeavyeOil Nos, 1.00 400 4, 5, &6 " ' '· 

### (a) The-<letermina!ien-ef.sllifur-ooHtent (pereeA! byweight) effuekhallhe earriee aut in aeeerdanee v1ith a pmeedure-aeeeptal>le te the depaFlmellh"Maximum weight percent sulfur content in fuel" means the maximum weight percent sulfurcontent in all fuels burned at anti time in a power plant. (b) Reoonlkeeping neeessaryte aemenstrate eempliaAee witfHhe-requirements afthisrule and eamplianee tesling-inusf-be eaneueted with a freqHeney aRe ina maruler-aeeeptahle te the depaFlment. A person shall sample, analyze, calculate, and record for each day ofoperation for each unit at thepower plant, the sulfurcontent ofthe fuel combusted and the fuel's equivalent S02 

### emission rate in accordance with asfired fuel sampling and analysis procedures found in appendix A of40 CFRpart 60; in particular the "Standard TestMethods for Sulfurin Petroleum Products:" ASTM DJ29-0l,D1266-98, orDl552-0l and the "Standard Test Methods for Total Sulfur in the Analysis ofCoal and Coke:" ASTMD3177-89 or D4239-02; as referenced in 40 C.F.R. pa1·t 60.17, adopted by reference in R 336.1802a. Records shall be kept, including the identification ofthepowerplant, days ofoperation, and maximum sulfur content of fuel combusted for each day ofoperation. Records shallbe maintained on site for 5 years and submitted to the department upon written request. (e) A eertain degree ofeontrelweula he required te meet thi£-limit if 1.0% sultilr fuel is usee in lieu of0.75% snlfuf-fuel-wltieh-musf-be-<leeumeatea aRe aemoAstratea in a mafl!ler-a '" .

(3) The use offuels having sulfur eontents-as-sef-ferth in table 41 aRe table 42 shall-net-allew-degradalien in the mass rate ofpartieulate emissions, unless otherwise autilerizee hyth<HiepaF!menbT!le-8epartment· may require souree emission tests wllieh may be perfeiTAee by, erunder-the-supervision of, the depaFlment at the expense ofthe owaers aad mayreljllire-the-suemissiea efrepertsto tlle-<lepaFlmenf-heth-hefere-and after ehanges are made in the sulfur eentent-ill-fueh

(3)(4) The following provisions applyto persons in Wa)Ole county: (a) The maximum weightpercent sulfur content in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisions oftable42 ofthis mle shall not applyto anypersonwho uses a combination offuels in such ratios as to meet the sulfur eieKiee S02 

### concentration limitations specified in table42 and·has obtained 1witten .. approval from the department for this exemption. The allowable concentration limit will be based on the value in the table for the fuel having the higher allowable concentration limit.

(b) The maximum weight percent sulfur content in fuel limitations for fuel-buming equipment provisions oftable42 ofthisrule shall not apply to anyperson who has received an installation permit from the department on a control device to desulfurize the stack gases and the control device is installed and operatingproperly. .

### F.1. 2011-029 EQ, Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approvak (4) Instead ofconductingdaily as-fired fuel sampling and analysis pursuant to subrule (2) ofthis rule1a person at any power plant equipped with a 802 continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) may compute and record the daily equivalent emission rates as determined by the S02 CEMS. The

### SO, CEMS shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated in accordance with the procedures in 40 CFR 60.13(d), (e), 

### (f), and {h) and in performance specification 2, appendix B of40 CFRpart 60 or40 CFRpart 75 excluding the data substitution outlined in subpart·D, adopted 

### by"· reference in R 336.1802a. Records shall be maintained on site for 5 years and submitted to the departmentupon written request. R 336.140Ia Defmitions.

Rule 40Ia. As used in this

### part: (a) 

### "Power plane' 

### means asingle shucture devoted to steam or electric generation, orboth, and may contain multiple boilers.

(b) "Sulfurrecoveryplant" means anyplant that recovers elemental sulfhr fi·om any gas stream. (c) "Used oil" means any fuel that is produced from used oil, as defined in R 299.9109(p). R 336.1402 Emission ofsulfur di<>*iee-S02 from f\Jel-buming equipment at a stationary source other than 

### powerplants.

Rule 402. {l)For

### At-a fuel burning equipment at a stationary source other than apower plant it is unlawful for a person to cause or allow the emission ofsulfur eie>dee S02 from the combustion ofany coal or oil fuel in excess of 1.7 pounds per millionBtu ofheat input for oil fuel or in excess of2.4 pounds per million Btu ofheat input for coal fuel.

(2)The provisions of"ubrule{l-) ofthismle do-not apply to a -fuel-burning<Oquipment at a stationary source that is unable to comply with the specified emission limits because ofsulfur diexide S02 emissions caused by the presence ofsulfur in otherraw materials charged to the ft!Cl-buming equipment-seurc-e. This exception shall apply ifat any time the actual sulfuf-<lie>d<le--S02 emission rate exceeds the expected theoretical sulfur diexide S02 emission rate from fuel burning. The expected theoretical sulfur dieJdde S02 emission rate shall be based on the quantityoffuel burned and the average sulfur content ofthe fuel.

(3) For

### At-a fuel burning equipment at a stationary source located 

### in Wayoe countyother than apower plant, it is unlawful for a person to burn fuel that does not comply with the sulfiu· content limitation oftable 43 and unlawful to cause or allow a discharge into the atmosphere from a- fuel burning equipment seuroe sfsulfur dieJdee-S02 in excess ofthe sulfur diexide SO, concentration limit shown in table 43.

(4) Table43 reads as follows: Table43 Fuel and sulfuH!iMi<le-S02 eConcentration!Limitations for fFuell>Btuning Equipment(<) at a Stationary sSources !Locatedin Wayne eCountyat a seuree eOther than a pPowerpPiants Fuei!Type Maximum wWeight pPercent S02 ppmveEmission rRates sSulfur eContent in fFuel(' b) eCorrected to 50%eExcess !Limitations for fFuel-l>Buming aAir• eEquipment Coal 0.75 420 

# .. Distillate eOil Nos. I & 2 0.30 120 Used eOil 1.0 300 Cmde and hHeavyaOil Nos. 1.00 400 4, 5, & 6 (a) The determination ofsulfurcontent (percent by weight) offuel shall be caniedout in accordance with apreeedure aeeeplaele le lhe-<lep- the "Standard TestMethods for Sulfurin Petroleum Products:" ASTMDl29-0l,D1266-98, orD1552-01 and the "Standard Test Methods forTotal .. Sulfur in the Analysis ofCoal and Coke:" ASTM D3177-89 orD4239-02; as referenced in 40 C.F.R. part 60.17 adopted by referencein R 336.1802a. (b)Reoof<lkeeping neeessaryte demenstmte eemplianee with the

**re~uirements-<>fthis** rule and eempliane<>-testing must ae eendueted with a lfequeney and-in a malliler aeeeptaale-te-!he-<lepaflment, Records shall be kept, including the identification ofthefuel bumingequipment, days of operation, and maximum sulfurcontent offuel combusted for each day ofoperation. Records

## F.1. 2011-029 EO, Strikethrough bold version as submi!Ject.for. appro.vaL,
shall be maintained on site for 5 years and submitted to the department upon written request. (c) A eertain degree efeentrel weuld be required te meet this limit if 1.9% sulfur fuel is ased in lieu ef9.7§% sulfur fuel whieh m:ISt lle deeumented and demef!Strated in a mall!ler aeeeptaale te the deJla-ffit.-For table 43, fuel burning equipment includes residential and commercial space and water heating. The maximum weight percent sulfur content in fuel and SO, ppmv emission rate limitations for distillate, crude, and heavy oils listed above also a ly to these units. (§) The use ef.fuels having sulfur eentenP.l-as-set ferth in ta!Jie 4.>-5hall-Bet allew degradatien in the mass rate efpartieulate-emissiens, unless otherwise authorized by the depa-ent. The depa-enH!layrequire seuree emissie!HesP.l-wltieh may be perfe>med !Jy, er-umler the supervision ef, the depa-ent at-the eKpense efthe e•n11ers and mayrequire the su!Jmissien-efreperts te the depa-entbeth aefere and after ehanges are made in-the sulfur eentent-in-fueh

(5)(61 The following provisions applyto persons inWa)O>e county: (a) The maximum weightpercent sulfur content in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipmentprovisions oftable 43 ofthis rule shall not apply to a person who uses a combination offuels in such ratios as to meet the sulfur aimiide-SO, concentration limitations specified in table 43 and has obtained written approval from the department for this exemption. The allowable concentration limit will be based on the value in the table for the fuel having the higher allowable concentration limit.

(b) Themaximum weight percent sulfurcontent in fuel limitations for fuel-buming equipment provisions oftable 43 ofthis rule sl.Jallnot applyto a person who has received an installation permit from the department for a control device to desulfurize the stack gases and the control device is installed and operating properly. R 336.1404 Emission ofsulfur dieKide S02 and sulfuric acid mist from sulfuric acid

**pl~nts.**

Rule 404. 

### (1) Itis tmlawful for a person to cause orallowthe emission ofsulfuric acid mist from any sulfuric acid plant in excess of0.50 pounds perton ofacid produced, the production being expressed as 100% sulfuric acid. (2) 

### It is unlawful for a person in Wa)O>e connty to cause or allow sulfur aiexiae S02 emissions into the atmosphere from any sulfuric acid plant to exceed 6.5 pounds per tonofacid produced.

(3) Compliance withthis mle shall be demonstrated using a preeeaure aeeepta!Jie !etheaepartmeHt 40 C.F.Rpart 60, appendix A, reference test method no. 8, adopted by reference in R 336.2004(1){1). R 336.1407. Sulfurcompound emissions from somces located within Wa)O>e countyandnot previously specified.

Rule 407. Both ofthe following applyto process and fuel bunting equipment at a stationary sources located within Wa)O>e county to which theprovisions ofR 336.1401 toR336.1406 do not apply.

(a) A person shall not cause or allow theemission into the atmosphere gases with a concentration ofsulfur dieKide S02greaterthan 300parts per millionby volume, which shall be corrected to 50% excess air.

(b) A person shall not cause or allow the emission into the atmosphere gases with a concentration of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or a combination thereofgreaterthan 15 milligrams percubic meter, which shall be corrected to 50%excess air. R 336.1420. Applicabilitydetenninations, defmitions, and permitting requirements under CAIRsulfur

**diexi~S0**

**2** trading program.

Rule 420. (1) As used in this rule, "CAIR"means clean air interstaterule. (2) The provisions of40 C.F.R. §97.202, §97.220 to §97.224 and the -apprepfiate opt-in provisions of40 C.F.R. §97.280 to §97.288 (:wll&-2011) are adoptedbyreference in this rule and are applicableto these rules. Copies of 40 C.F.R. §97.202, §97.220 to §97.224, and §97.280 to §97.288 are available for inspection and purchase at the Department ofEnvironmental Quality, Air QualityDivision, 525 West Allegan Street, P.O. Box 30260, Lansing, Michigan 48909-7760, at a cost as ofthe time ofadoption ofthis rule of$+G.OO $76.00. Copies may be also obtained from the Superintendent ofDocuments, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 3719§4, PittsiJurgh, Pennsylvania 1§259 79§4, 732 North Capitol Street,NW, Washington, DC20401, by calling 1-866-512-1800 or by accessing their online bookstore

### F.1. 2011-029 EQ, Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approval."

1;·.. at.http;//boo)<.<tore.gpo.goy at acost as pfthetime ohdoptio.np.fthis n!lQ of&@,!t{lj($66.00)Sf-<li.Hile Unitea States gevennnent printing effiee intemet-well site at v,ww.aeeess.gpe.gev. The standards can be viewed and/or printed free ofcharge at http;//ecfr.gpoaccess.gov.

(3) Each CAIR sulfur aiffifiee-S02 

### source, as defined in 40 C.F.R. §97.202 is required to apply for a CAIR permit in accordance with 40 C.F.R. §97.220 to §97.224. This pennit shall be administered in · 

### accordance with the procedural requirements ofR336.1214 and shall be incorporated into the facility's renewable operatingpermii as an attachment.

### i-.2. 2005-036 EO, Strikethrough bold..vers-ion as -submitted for approval. , ....
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION AIR POLLUTION CONTROL Filed with the Secretary ofState on This rule becomes effective immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State unless adopted under sections 33, 44, 45a(6), or 48 of 1969 PA 306. Rules adopted under these sections become effective 7 days afterfiling with the Secretary ofState. (By authority conferred on the director ofthe department ofenvironmental quality by sections 5503 and 5512 of 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.5503 and 324.5512, and Executive Reorganization Order No. 1995-18, MCL 324.99903) - R 336.1401, R 336. '1402, and R-336.1404 ofthe Michigan Administrative Code are amended, and R 336.1401a, R 336.1405, R 336.1406, R 336.1407, and R 336.1420 are added to the Code as follows: PART 4. EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONSSULFUR-BEARING COMPOUNDS R 336.1401 Emission ofsulfur dioxide from power plants. Rule 401. (1) In a power plant, it is unlawful for a person to burn fuel that does not comply with the sulfur content limitation oftable 41 orwhich, when burned, results in sulfur dioxide emissions exceeding an equivalent emission rate as shown in table 41. 42, unless all of the following conditions are met In a power

. plant located in Wayne county, it is unlawful for a person to burn fuel that

does not comply with the sulfur content limitation oftable 42 and unlawful to cause or permit a discharge into the atmosphere from fuel-burning equipment sulfur dioxide in excess ofthe·sulfur dioxide concentration limit shown in table 42. (a) The source offuei-Surning is not subject to federal emission standards fer new stationary sources. (b) An installation permit, if required by part 2, was approved by the department before /\ugust 17, 1971. (e) The userfurnishes evidence that the fuel burning does not create, or contribute to, an ambient level of sulfur dioxide in excess ofthe ar:>plioable ambient air quality standards. The evideFtoe shall consist of air quality data or stack dispersion calculations, or both, satisfactory to the department. (d) The user is operating in compliance with a voluntary agreement, order, stipulation, or variaflee-frem-!J:le departmeffi.

## ,, F.2. 2005.-036 .EQ,, 

## Strikethrough bold versionas submitted.for-.appr.ovaL
. (2) Notwithstanding the-flrovision&-Bf..s1olbrule-{1) ofthis rule, an exoeption...from the limitations oftable 41 shall not be permitted after January 1, 1980, unless speoifio authorization is**gran~e!th** 

### (3) A person responsible for operation ofa souroe that, on the-effeottve date of !He 1973 amendment to this rule or for any ..antioipated time in the future, is or will. be using fuel with a sulfur oontent in exoess of that allowed to be burned on July 1, 1978, as liste€1--iR-lable 41, or whioh, on suoh effeotive date or any arltisif*itod time in the future, is orwill be-emitting sulfur dioxide in exoess ofthe equivalent emission foF-lflat-fuel, as shown in table 42, shall submit to the-GOfiaflmonkl written program for oomfl"liaRoe with this rule-within 60 days after suoh effeotive date. This requirement does not apply to a souroe for whish the department has approved an exception to table 41 .under the provisions of subrule (1) ofthis-ful&.- (4) The program required by subrule (3) ofthis rule shall inelude the method by whioh oomplianee-sRall-be aohieved, a oomplete-GesoriptioA-Of-Aew equipmeffi to-be installed or modifioations to existing equipment to be made, and a timetable wRioh speoifies, at a mif!imum, all-Bf-the following dates: (a) The-date equipment shall-be-ordered. (b) The date oonstruotion or modifioation of equipment shall begi&. -{ej-+J:le date in**itial-s!affilft-Bt-et~Hipment=..JJa.ll...b~i&.**



### .- (d) The date emissions shall be reduoedto levels shovm in tables 41 and 42. (5) The department may allow-af!Y-Souroe that is required to submit a oomplianoe program under subrule (3) of this rule an extension to the programmod-somplianoe date, ifall ofthe follmving oonditioR&-afO-FfleF. -{a) The souroe offuel burnin§-is-Rot subjeot to federal emission standards for new stationary souroes. (b) /\n installation permit, if required by part 2, was approved by-#le department before-l\lJgust 17, 1971. (e) The userfurnishes satisfaetory-evidenoe to the department that the fuel blJming does not oreate or oontriblJte to an ambient level ofsulfur dioxWe-in exoess ofthe-applicable ambient air quality standards. (6) A person shall not oausD-OfiJermit the burning offuel in any fuel burning etjllipment that results in an-a-verage-omissioA-Of sulfur dioxide for any oalendar month at a rate greaterthan was emitted by that fuel burning equipment for the corresponding oalendar month ofthe year 1970, unless otherwise authorized by tl=le departmonh --f?r-The--use-offuels having sulfur oontents as set forth in this rule shall not allow degradation in the mass rate of partiwlate emission, unless otherwise authorized by-#!e department. The department may require souroe emission tests whioh may be performed by, or under thD-SlJpervision of, the department at the expense ofthe owners and may require the submission of reports to the department both before and after ohanges are made in tlie sulfur content in fuel.**~(2)** 

### Tables 

## 41 and 

## 42 read as follows:

### F.2. 2005-036 EO. Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approval.
. TABLE 41 Sulfur in fuel limitations fur fuel burning equipment Plant eaj3a6ityW4QGQ..lb&. Sffiam per hoUf Mal«mum sulfur content in fuel(!>) Percent by 

### weighl July 1,1975 

### 0-BGG Over 

### 5GG

F

### ue an 

## M 

## 4k July1,1978 

## 4k -'hG d 

## If d' 'd TABLE 

## 41 

# r ·t 

# r f 

## f I b su ur IOXI e emiSSIOn 1m1 a 1ons or ue urnmg eqwpmen Maximum Equivalent emission rates 

### t average Parts per million by Pounds ofsulfur Plant Capacity(•) sulfur volume (ppmv) corrected dioxide per million Btu content in to 50% 

### excess air of heat input fuel(b) Solid fuel 1

### c 1 

### Liquid fuel 1" 1 

### Solid Liquid Percent (12,000 (18,000 

### fuel(c) fuel(d)

.•

- 

### _f>y weight. Btullb) 

## . . 

### B.tu/lb)
. . .(12,000 - . (18,000 .. 

### Stullb) Stullb) 0-500,000 

### lbs steam 1.5 890 630 2.5 1.67 

### per hour plant capacity Greater than 500,000 1.0 590 420 1.67 1.11 

### lbs steam per hour plant capacity

. 

### (a) The total steam production capacity ofalfcoal: and oil-burning equipment in a power plant as ofAugust 

## 17, 1971. (b) "Maximum average sulfur content in fuel" means the average sulfur content in all fuels burned at any 

## 1 time in a power plant. The sulfur contentshall be calculated on the basis of 

## 12,000 Btu per pound for solid fuels and 

## 18,000 Btu per pound for liquid fuels. The determination ofsulfur content (percent byweight) of fuel shall be carried out in accordancewith a procedure acceptable to the department. (c) Solid fuels include both pulverized coal and'alf'other coal.· (d) Liquid fuels include distillate oil (No. 

## 1 and No. 

## 2), heavy oil (No. 4, No. 5, and No. 6), and crude oil. TABLE 42 IO'n•

**,;.,~'en!** 

### emission rates %Sulfur in Parts per million I:Jy VBltlffle Poo!ias of sulfur aimdEl6-f3ef fuels© cerrecteEl to 50% e)(eess air ;u; rHo ,f

**~** ,, · ,, 

### &elia fuel 1 <3j 

### Liquia fuel(ej Selia fuel(ej Liquia fuel(ej I 1 "> ()()() D'"/lh\ 11

# o""" o'"""' '1 "> ()()() D,,/Jhl 1_1 Q ('1(\(\_Qf,llh\ 

## ' ' ' '

### F.2. 2005-036 EQ, Strikethrough bold version as submitted for.approval.
. .,

(a) For the purpose ofthis rule, "plant eapaeity" is defined as the-letaI steam· .. production eapaeity of all eoal and oil burning equipment in a power plant as of AHgust 17, 1971. A "power plant" is defined as a single structure devoted to steam or eleetrie generation, or both, and 

## may eontain multiple boilers.

(b) "Maximum sulfur eontent in fuel" is defiAed as the average sulfur eontent in all fuels burned at any-ene time in a pmver plant. The-sulfuf-eontent shall be ealeulated on the basis of 12,000 Btu per pound for solia-fuels and 18,000 Btu per pound-fef-liquid fuels.

(e) The determination of sulfur eontent (pereent by weight) offuel shall be eaffied out in aeeordanee with a procedure aeeeptable to the-Eiepartmeflh**~-Solid** 

### fuels--iJ:leluae-both--jwlverized-wal and all other eoal.

(e) Liquid fuels inelude distillate oil (No. 1 and No. 2), heavy oil (No. 4, No. 5, and No. 6), and erude oihTABLE 42 

# .•.**~'..** 

### . . Fuel and sulfur**dioxid<~** 

### concentration limitations for fuel burning equipment located in Wayne county Fuel type Maximum weight percent sulfur content in fuel!•l 

## so2 ppmv emission rates corrected to 50% excess air!bl limitations for fuel-burning equipment Pulverized coal 1.00 550 Other coal 0.75 420 Distillate oil Nos. 1 & 

### 2 0.30 120 Waste and used oil 1.0 300 1c1 

### Crude and heavy oil 1.00 400 Nos. 4, 5, & 

### 6 (a) The determination ofsulfurcontent (percent by weight) offuel shall be carried out in accordance with a procedure acceptable to the department. (b) Recordkeeping necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements ofthis rule and compliance testing must be conducted with a frequency and in a manner acceptable to the department. (c) A certain degree ofcontrol would be required to meet this limit if 1.0% sulfurfuel is used in lieu of0.75% sulfurfuel which must be documented and demonstrated in a manner acceptable to the department. (3) The use offuels having sulfur contents as set forth in table 41 and table 42 shall not allow degradation in the mass rate ofR;l.rticulate emissions, unless otherwise authorized by the department. The department may require source emission tests which may be performed by, or under the supervision of, the departmentat the expense ofthe owners and may require the submission of reports to the department both before and after changes are made in the sulfur content in fuel.

## F.2. 2005,036 EO, Strikethrouqh bold version

**;;~s** 

## submitted for approval. (4) The following provisions apply to persons in Wayne county: (a) The maximum weight percentsulfur content in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisions oftable 42 ofthis rule shall notapply to any person who uses a combination offuels in such ratios as to meet the sulfur dioxide concentration limitations specified in table 42 and has obtained written approval from the departmentfor this exemption. The allowable concentration limitwill be based on the value in the table for the fuel having the higherallowable concentration limit. (b) The maximum weight percentsulfur content in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisions oftable 42 ofthis rule shall notapply to any person who has received an installation permitfrom the department on a control device to desulfurize the stack gases and the control device is installed and operating properly. R 336.1401a Definitions. Rule 401a. As used in this part: (a) "Power plant" means a single structure devoted to steam or electric generation, or both, and may contain multiple boilers. (b) "Sulfur recovery plant" mNlllS any plantthat recovers elemental sulfu.drom any gas stream·; " ··· · · · · ·· · · · R336.1402 Emission ofsulfur dioxide from fuel-burning sources other than power plants. Rule 402. (1) Except as provided in rule 401 and subrule (2), At a fuel burning source otherthan a power plant after January 1, 1981, it is unlawful for a person to cause or allow the emission ofsulfur dioxide from the combustion of any coal or oil fuel in excess of 1.7 pounds per million BWs Btu of heat input for oil fuel or in excess of 2.4 pounds per million BWs Btu ofheat input for coal fuel. (2) The provisions of !Ais-rule-subrule (1) ofthis rule do not apply to a fuelburning source that is unable to comply with the specified emission limits because of sulfur dioxide emissions caused by the presence ofsulfur in other raw materials charged to the fuel-burning source. This exception shall apply ifat any time the actual sulfur dioxide emission rate exceeds the expected theoretical sulfur dioxide emission rate from fuel burning. The expected theoretical sulfur dioxide emission rate shail be based on the qliamity of fuel burned and the · average sulfur content ofthe fuel. (3) At a fuel burning source located in Wayne county other than a power plant, it is unlawful for a person to burn fuel that does not complywith the sulfur content limitation oftable 43 and unlawful to cause or allow a discharge into the atmosphere from a fuel burning source ofsulfurdioxide in excess ofthe sulfur dioxide concentration limitshown in table 43. (4) Table 43 reads as follows: Table 43 Fuel and sulfur dioxide concentration limitations for fuel burning sources

## F.2. 2005-036 EQ, Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approval.
. located in Wayne county at a source otherthan power plants Fuel type Maximum weight S02 ppmv

### emission percent sulfur content rates corrected to 

## 50% in fuel(a) limitations for excess airCbl fuel-burning equipment Coal 

## 0.75 420 Distillate oil Nos. 

## 1 & 

## 2 0.30 120 Waste and used oil 

## 1.0 3QQICJ Crude and heavy oil 

## 1.00 400 Nos. 

## 4, 5, & 6 (a) The determination ofsulfur content (percent byweight) offuel shall be carried out in accordance with a procedure acceptable to the department. (b) Recordkeeping necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements ofthis rule and compliance testing must be conducted with afrequency and in a manner acceptable to the department. (c) A certain degree ofcontrol would be required to meet this limit if 1.0% 

### sulfur fuel is used in lieu of0.75% 

### sulfurfuel which must be documented and demonstrated in a manner acceptable to the department. -'!11' 

## ·(5) The use offuels having sulfur contents as set forth in table 

## 43 shall notallow degradation in the mass rate of particulate emissions, unless otherwise authorized by the department. The department may require source emission tests which may be performed by, or underthe supervision of, the department atthe expense ofthe owners and may· require the submission of reports to the department both before and after changes are made in the sulfur content in fuel. (6) The following provisions apply to persons in Wayne county: (a) The maximum weight percent sulfur content in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisions oftable 

## 43 ofthis rule shall notapply to a person who uses a combination offuels in such ratios as to meet the sulfur dioxide concentration limitations specified in table

## 43 and has obtained written approval from the departmentfor this exemption. The allowable concentration limitwill be based on the value in the table for the fuel having the higher allowable concentration limit. (b) The maximum weight percent sulfur content in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisions oftable 

## 43 ofthis rule shall notapply fo a person who has received an installation permit from the departmentfor a control device to desulfurize the stack gases and the control device is installed and operating properly. R 

## 336.1404 Emission ofsulfur dioxide and sulfuric acid mist from sulfuric acid plants. Rule 

## 404. (1) AfterJuly 1, 1 98G,It is unlawful for a person to cause or allow the emission ofsulfuric acid mist from any sulfuric acid plant in excess of

# o:so pounds per ton ofacid produced, the production being expressed as 

## 100% FI2SG4 sulfuric acid.'I 

### " 

## F.2. 2005-036 EQ, Strikethr.o.ugh bald.version as submittedJor approval. (2) It is unlawful for a person in Wayne county to cause or allow sulfur dioxide emissions into the atmosphere from any sulfuric acid plant to exceed 6.5 pounds per ton ofacid produced. (3) Compliance with this 

## limit rule shall be demonstrated using reference test method 8 a procedure acceptable to the department. R 336.1405 Emissions from sulfur recovery plants located within Wayne county. Rule 405. At sulfur recovery plants located in Wayne county, a person shall notcause or allow the emission into the atmosphere ofsulfur dioxide, sulfurtrioxide, or sulfuric acid from any such sulfur recovery plantto exceed 0.01 pounds per pound ofsulfur produced. R 336.1406 Hydrogen sulfide emissions from facilities located within Wayne county. Rule 406. (1) A person in Wayne county shall not cause or allowthe combustion of any refinery process gas stream that contains hydrogen sulfide in a concentration ofgreaterthan 100 grains per 100 cubic feet of gas without removal of

**th~f1ydrogen** 

## sulfide in excess ofthis con'centration'. . · ·· ·. ' · •· • · · ·. · ·· · .· · · · · ....·· (2) When the odor of hydrogen sulfide is found to exist beyond the property line ofa source, a person in Wayne county shall notcause or allowthe concentration of hydrogen sulfide to exceed 0.005 parts per million by volume for a maximum period of2 minutes. R 336.1407. Sulfur compound emissions from sources located within Wayne county and not previously specified. Rule 407. Both ofthe following apply to process and fuel burning sources located within Wayne county to which the provisions of R 336.1401 toR 336.1406 do notapply. (a) A person shall not cause or allowthe emission into the atmosphere gases with a concentration ofsulfur dioxide greaterthan 300 parts per million byvolume, which shall be corrected to 50% excess air. (b) A person shall notcause or allowthe emission into the atmosphere gases with a concentration ofsulfuric acid or sulfurtrioxide or a combination thereofgreaterthan 15 milligrams per cubic.meter1

## which shall be corrected to 50% excess air. R 336.1420. Applicability determinations, definitions, and permitting requirements under CAIR sulfur dioxide trading program. Rule 420. (1) As used in this rule, "CAIR" means clean air interstate rule. (2) The provisions of40 C.F.R. §97.202, §97.220 to §97.224 and the · appropriate opt-in provisions of40 C.F.R. §97.280 to §97.288 (2006) are adopted by reference in this rule and are applicable to these rules. Copies of 40 C.F.R. §§97.202, §97.220 to §97.224 and 97.280 to §97.288 are available for inspection and purchase atthe Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division, 525 WestAllegan Street, P

## .0. Box 30260," 

# ' 1="2. 

## 2005-036 EQ, Strikethrough bold version as"submitted for approval. .., , "

Lansing, Michigan 

## 48909-7760, at a cost as ofthe time ofadoption ofthis rule of

## $70.00. Copies may also be obtained from the Superintendent of Do.9uments, Government 

## Printing Office, P.O. Box 

## 371954, Pittsburgh, " Pe6nsylvania 

## 1!i25Q-7954,_qt<\

**Go~ta1'l** 

## oftlw.time ofadoption ofthisrule of " "



## $60.00; or on the United States government 

## printing office internetweb site atwww.access.gpo.gov. 

## (3) Each CAIR sulfur dioxide source, as defined in 

## 40 C.F.R. 

## §97.202 is required to apply for a CAIR permit in accordance with 

## 40 C.F.R. 

## §97.220 to 

## §97.224. This permitshall be administered inaccordance with the procedural requirements of R 

## 336.1214 and shall be incorporated into the facility's renewable operating permitas an attachment.

### F.3. C.ornbined Strikethrough bold version·a.s.submitted,for approval,... •

MICHIGANDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION AIRPOLLUTION CONTROL PART 4. EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS-SULFURBEARING COMPOUNDS Filed with the Secretary ofState on Thisrule becomes effective immediately upon filing with the Secretary ofState unless adopted under sections 33, 44, or45a(6) of 1969 PA 306. Rules adopted under these sections become effective 7 days after filing with the Secretary ofState. (By authority confetred on the directorofenviromnental quality by sections 5503 and 5512 of 1994 PA 451, MCL324.5503 and 324.5512, and Executive Reorganization OrderNe,umbers 1995·+S16, MCL 324.99903,2009-31,MCL324.99919 and 2011-1, MCL 324. 99921)



### R 336.1401,

### R 336.1401a,

### R 336.1402, 

### R 336.1407 and 

### R 336.1420 ofthe Michigan Administratil•e Code are amended, to read as follows: R 336.140

### I Emissionofsulfur dioxide limnpower plants.

Rule 401. (I)

### In a power plant, it is unlawful for a person to bumfuel that does not comply with the sulfur content limitation oftable 41 or which, when bumed, results in sulfur dioxide (S02) emissions exceeding an equivalent emission rate as shown 

### in table 41.42;-lmless all efthe fellewing eendiliens are met! Irl a. power plant located in Wayne county, it is unlawful for a person to burn fuel that does hot comply with the sulfurcontent limitation oftable 42 and unlawful to cause or permit a discharge into the atmosphere from fuel-buming equipment SO, in excess ofthe SO, concentration limit shown in table 42.(a) The seuree af

**l'u~eH<Jbject** te federal emission-standards fer new statianarysenrees. (e) An installationpermit, ifrequired ey

### part 2, was apprevecl-lw<he-t!epartment-befere August 17, · +97+, (c) The user fumishes eviaenee that the fuel euming aees net ereate, eF-OOn!rieute ta, an amhient level ekulfur aie1dde in exeess of4e-applieable-ameient air

**~uality** standards. The eviaenee shall eonsist efaiF

**~uali!y-<laHH>r-staelH!isjlefSion-c-aleulaliens,er-beth,** satisfaetel)'te the department, 

### (cl) The-!lser-is-Bperating in eemplianee with a Yeluntary-agreement,eraer, stip:rlalien,er varianee lfem the aepartmentc (2) Notwithstandingtheprevisions ofsuerule (I) efthisrule, an exc-eptien fl·em the-limitations oftable 41 shall netaejlmmittea after Jawaary l, l98G, unless specil1e autherii<alien is granted eythe-department, (3) A persen-respensiele fer eperatien efa souree that, en the effeetive elate efthe 1973 ameuclment-te this rule er feHIH)'-flnlieipatea time in the future, is er will be asiag fHel·witka sulfur eontenrilrexeess ·ef that-allewea te be a:rrued en-July I, 1978, as listed in table 41, erwhieh, on sueh effeetive date er-any anticipated time in the--future, is erwill be emittil1g sulfur dioxide in e1wess efthe

**e~uil'alent** emissiea fer that fuel, as shevm in table 42, shall submit te the department a

**v.~ilttlfl-J'regram** fur eemplianee with this mle within 6G days afteHHeh effeetive elate. This

**re~uirement** <lees-net applyte a seuree fer whieh the department has approved an e"eeptien te table 41 under the pravisiens efsuerule (I) efthisrule. (4) Theprogram

**re~uirea** by suerule (3) ofthis rule shall in<>hl<le-#le-methea by whieh cemplianee shall 00-aehieve<l, a complete <leseriptien efnewequipment-te-be instaltecl er'moail1ealiens te e"isting

**e~uipment** ta lle-ma<le, ana a timetable whieh speeifies, at a minimum, all efthe fellewing elates: (a) The date

**e~uipment** shall be enlerea. ---€h)-Theelate eenstruetieJH>r-mediflealieJH>f.equipment shall begin. (e) The elate initial startup efequipment shallllegin. (d) The <late emissions shall be reaueea te leYels shewn in tallies 41

**an~**

### F.3. Combined Strikethrough. b0ld version as submitted for approval. (5) The aepatiment may allew any seuree-tltat is**re~nirea** te submit a eemplian'*i'regra!lHHla€f suamle (3) efthismle an eKtensien te the pregraHll!lea eemplianee Elate, ifall ef.th&-fellewing-oonffitiens 

### are met: (a) The seHree effuel burning is net subjeet te-fetleral emission stanaaras feHlew-sl<!tienary-seurees. (a) An installation permit,**ifre~uirea** aypari 2, was apprevea ay the-<lepaflmelli-l>efere AHgust 17, +97+. (e) The-HSef-furnishes satisfuetery eviaenee te the aepa-en!-lhatthe fuel atHlling aees net ereate er eell!Fioote-t<Hl!Hlmbient-level-ef..mlftlHii""-i<!e-in-<"'"ess efthe applieaale ambient air**~uality** stanclarcls. 

### (6) A person shall net eaHse erpenni! the bHming effuel in any fuel**llllflli~uipment** that resnlts in an average emission efsHifur aimda&-ffiHny-<>alenaar mentlr at arate greaterthan-was emittea by that fuelbuming**e~uipment** fer the eerrespenaing ealenaarmenth efthe year 1970,-unless-etherwise a:.therizea ay the aepaflment. (7) The use effuels having sulfHF eentents as set fef!h in this rule shall net allew aegraaatien in the mass rate ef.paflieulate emission, llllless otherwise autherire<!-&y-the aepaflment. The aepartmentmay**re~nire** seuree-emissien tests whieh may ae perfenneaby, eH!naerthe supervision ef, the department at the elipense eftheowners ana may**re~nire** the submission efrepefls-t&{he-<lepa-ent-l>eth-aefere ana after ehanges are maae in the sulfur eentent in fuel.



### (2) Tables 41 and 42 read as follows:

Plant eapaeityl•) 1 000 Ills. Stearn perheur 

### TABLE41
Ma>dmum sulfur eentent in fueJll>i Pereent ay 'Neight 

### JH!y+,-1-9'/-5 2,{) 

### .J-.-5 

### Fuel and 802 

### Emission Limitations for PowerPlants 

### Maximum EquivalentEmission Rates Average Parts perMillion by Volume Plant Capacity(•) Sulfur (ppmv) Corrected to 50% Excess Content in 

### Airt•i Fuel(b,<) Solid Fuel1

### 'i Liquid Fuel''1 (Percent by (12,000 Btu/lb) (18,000 Btu/lb) Weight) 0-500,000 lbs Steam per 1.5 890 630 HourPlant Capacity Greaterthan 500,000 lbs 1.0 590 .420 Steam perHourPlant Capacity Pounds ofS02 

### per Million Btu ofHeat Input(•) Solid Fuel''1 Liquid (12,000 Fuel(dJ Btullb) (18,000 Btullb) 2.5 1.67 1.6? 1.11 (a) The total steam production capacity ofall coal- and oil-burning equipment in a power plant as ofAugust 17, 1971. (b) "Maximum average sulfurcontent in fuel" means the average sulfurcontent in all fuels burned at any 1 time in a power plant. The sulfur content shall be calculated on the basis of 12,000 Btu per pound for solid fuels and 18,000 Btu per pound for liquid fuels. """ ' 

### (c) Solid fuels include both pulverized coal and all othercoal. (d) Liquid fuels include distillate oil (No. 1 and No.2), heavy oil (No. 4 No.5 and No.6), and crude oil. (e) A person shall sample, analyze, calculate and record for each day ofoperation for each unit at the power plant, the sulfurcontent ofthe fuel combusted or the fuel's equivalent S02

### emission rate in accordance with as-fired fuel sampling and analysis procedures found in appendix A of40 CFR part 60; in particular the "Standard Test Methods for Sulfurin Petroleum Products:" ASTM D129-01, D1266-98, orD1552-01 and the

### F"3. Combined Strikethrough boldversion.as submittedfor approvaL "Standard Test Methods for Total Sulfur in the Analysis ofCoal and Coke:" ASTM 03177-89 or· D4239-02; as referenced in 40 C.F.R. part60.17, adopted by reference in R 336.1802a. Records shall be kept, including the identification ofthe power plant, days ofoperation, and maximum sulfur content offuel combusted for each day ofoperation. Records shall be maintained on site for 5 years and submitted to the department upon written request. TABLE42 n" .L %--Slllfuf--ifr.fuels" Parts permillion byvolume eerreetea to Pemuls efsulfur aiexiae**~er** mi!li<>&Bm §9% eJ<eess air

. .n , Selia fuel bi<jllid-4\!el"' Seli4-fuel'"' biqHiG-fuel,.,**E1~,999** Btu'l!l) fj-8,{)99 BtulJb)**E1~,999** Btu%) 

## E! 8,999 Btu'lb) +.\) 

# m 4W +.6+ 

### +.++ g 89() 

### 6W b§{l 

### +.6+ ;h{) 

### +;+80 841)**~ ~**  fa) Fof-llle-purpese ofthis rule, "plant wpaeity" is aefiHe&as-tbe total steam**~roauetion** eapaeity ef.all**~nd-eil-bumillg** equipment in a pmverplant as ofAugust 17, 1971. A "powerplan!''-i!Hlelinea as a single-ffiruerure-devetea to steam or eleetrie generation, orbeth, ana may contain multiple beilers,

Ee) "MaKimunHulfureentoot 

### ill fuel" is aelinea as the average sulfur content in all fuels-ffirmea at any ooe-time 

### illapewer-plant.-+he-sulfur eentent shall be ealeulatea en the basis of**1~,99()-Btu-per-peunMer selid-fuels-im~1a**  fer li'!ui4-fuel&**~~T~"'**detff·minatkm-efsulfur eontent**B>e-lit-hy·v.'<>igh~}·af**ltlekhafl..be-oorrJOO-ellt·

### in-ac-ooffiane<>-wi!ll a proeea<!fe-a€€€j>!able--te--the aepartmen!-c fa) Solie fuels ineluae-hethiJulverizea eoal ana all ether eoal.**~** Liquia fuels ineluae aistillate-ei!-ENo. I and**No.~),** hea•,T oil (No. 4, No. §,anaNo. 6), ana emde oil. 

### Fuel and S02 

### Concentration Limitations for PlantsLocated in Wayne County Maximum Weight Percent Sulfur S02

### ppmv Emission Rates Corrected Fuel Type 

### Content in Fuel(a & b)Limitations 

### to 50% Excess Air (b) 

### for Fuei-Burnin2 Equipment Pulverized Coal 1.00 550



## - Other Coal 0.75 420 Distillate Oil Nos. 1 & 

### 2 0.30 120 Used Oil 1.00 300 Crudeand Heavy Oil Nos. 1.00 400 4, 5, & 

### 6 (a) "1\faximum weight percent sulfur content in fuel" means the maximum weight percent sulfur content 

### in all fuels burned at any 1 time in a powerplant. (b) A person shall sample, analyze, calculate, and record for each day ofoperation for each unit at the power plant, the sulfurcontent ofthe fuel combusted and the fuel's equivalent S02 

### emission rate in accordance with as-fired fuel sampling and analysis proceduresfound inappendix·A·of40 CFRpart 60; in particularthe "Standard TestMethods for Sulfurin Petroleum Products:" ASTM Dl29-01, 01266-98, orD1552-01 and the "Standard TestMethods for Total Sulfur in the Analysis ofCoal and Coke:" ASTM D3177-89 orD4239-02; as referenced in 40 C.F.R. part 60.17, adopted by reference in R 336.1802a. Records shall be kept, including theidentification ofthe power plant, days ofoperation, and maximum sulfur content offuel combusted for each day ofoperation. Records shall be maintained on site for 5 years and submitted to the department upon written request.

(3) The following provisions apply to persons in Wayne county: (a) The maximum weight percent sulfurcontent in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisions oftable 42 ofthis rule shall not apply to any person who uses a combination offuels in such ratios as to meet the S02 

### concentration limitations specified in table42 and has obtained written approval from the department for this exemption. The allowable concentration limit will be based on thevalue in the table for the fuel having thehigher allowable concentration limit.

### F.3. Combined Strikethrough bold.version as submitted.for approval.. (b) The maximum weight percent sulfur content in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisions oftable 42 ofthis rule shall not apply to any person who has received an installation permit from the department on a control device to desulfurize the stackgases and the control device is installed and operating properly.

(4) Instead ofconducting daily as-fired fuel sampling and analysis pursuant to subrule (2) ofthis rule, a person at any power plant equipped with a S02 continuous emissions monitoringsystem 

### (CEMS) may compute and·record·the daily equivalent emission rates as·ctetermined bytheS02' · CEMS. The

### S02 

### CEMS shall becalibrated, maintained and operated in accordance with the procedures set forth in 40 CFR60.13(d), (e), (1), 

### and (h) and in performance specification 2, appendix Bof40 CFR part60 or 40 CFR part75 excluding the data substitution outlined in subpart D, 

### adopted by reference in R 336.1802a. Records shall be maintained on site for 5 years and submitted to the department upon written request. R 336.1401a Definitions,

Rule 401a. As used in this part: (a) 11Powcr plant11 means a single structure devoted to steam or electric generation, or both, and 

### may contain multiple boilers.

(b) "Sulfur recovery plant" means anyplant that recovers elemental sulfurfrom any gas stream, (c) "Used oil" means any fuel that is produced from used oil, as defined iu R 299.9109(p). R 336.1402 Emission ofSlllfuf-<liffiade-S02

### from fuel-burning equipment at a stationary source other than powerplants. ,; Rule 402. (I)E"eept as previaea

**iH-mle-40+-uHd-s!tbrule-(~** 

### For fuel burning equipment at a "· . . stationary sourceotherthan a powerplant aller...Jatlill!fJ'""J,-l9M 

### it is unlawful for a person to eause or. allow the emission ofSlllfuHlit>J<lde-S02 

### from the combustion ofany coal or oil 1\Iel in excess ofI.7 pounds per million BhHl-Btu ofheat input for oil fuel or in excess of2.4 pounds per million Bht's-Btu of heat input for coal fuel.

(2) The provisions oftltis-rule subrule (1) ofthis rule do not apply to a fuel-bi1roing equipment at a stationary source that is unable to comply with the specified emission limits because ofsulfur.dl<>xiae 

### S02 

### emissions caused bythe presence ofsulfurin otherraw materials charged to the filel-buroing· equipment-wllf£e. This exception shall apply ifat any time the actual s"lfur aiexiae-S02 

### emission rate exceeds the expected theoretical sulfur eiexiae

## so, emission rate from fuel burning. The expected theoretical sulfur ait>J<lde-S02 

### emission rate shall be based on the quantity offuelburned and the average sulfur content ofthe fuel.

(3) For fuel burning equipment at a stationarysource located in Waynecounty other than a power plant, it is unlawful for a person to burn fuel that does not comply with the sulfur content limitation oftable 43 and unlawful to cause or allow a discharge into the atmosphere from fuel burning equipment 

### S02 

### in excess ofthe 

### S02 

### concentration limit shown in table 43,

(4) Table43 reads as follows: Table 43

Fuel and SO, Concentration Limitations for Fuel BurningEquipment<'> at a Stationary Sources Located in Wavne Count\' Other than a PowerPlant Fuel Type Maximum Weight Percent 

### S02 

### ppmv Emission Rates Sulfur Content in Fud'• b) 

### Corrected to 50% Excess Limitations for Fuel-Burning Air' Equipment Coal 0.75 420 Distillate Oil Nos. 1 & 2 0.30 120 Used Oil 1.0 300- ·. 

### Crude and Heavy Oil Nos. 4, 1.00 400 5,& 6 (a) The determination ofsulfurcontent (percent by weight) offuel shall be carried out in accordance with the "Standard Test Methods for Sulfut· in Petroleum Products:"ASTMD129- 01, D1266-98, or01552-01 and the "Standard Test Methods for Total Sulfur in the Analysis of Coal and Coke:" ASTM D3177-89 orD4239-02; as referenced in 40 C.F.R. pat·t 60.17 adopted 

### ' .I.

### F.3. Combined Strikethrouqh.l:>old version as submittedJor approvaL by reference in R 336.1802a. (b) Records shall be kept, including the identification ofthe fuel buming equipment, days of operation, and maximum sulfurcontent offuel combusted for each day ofOReration, Records shall be maintained on site for 5 years and submitted to the department upon written request. (c) For table43, fuel burning equipment includes residential and commercial space and water heating. The maximum weight pe1·cent sulfurcontentin fuel and S02 

### ppmvemission rate limitations for distillate, crude, and heavy oils listed above also apply to these units. (5) The following provisions apply to persons in Wayne county: (a) The maximum weight percent sulfurcontent in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment provisions oftable 43 ofthis rule shall not applyto a person who uses a combination offuels in such ratios as to meet the S02 

### concentration limitations specified in table 43 and has obtained written approval from the departmentfor this exemption. The allowable concentration limit will be based on the value in the table for the fuel having the higher allowable concentration limit.

(b) The maximum weight percentsulfurcontent in fuel limitations for fuel-burning equipment pi'Ovisions oftable 43 ofthis rule shall not

**~pply** 

### to a person who has received an installation permit from the departmentfor a control device to desulfurize the stackgases and the control device is installed and operatingproperly. R 336:1404 Emission of

## so;and ·sulfuric

## acid niis1 from sul.fi>ric·acid plants. "



### Rule 404. (1) Aller July l, l98G,;!-It is unlawful for aperson to cause orallow the emission ofsulf\lric acid mist from any sulfmic acid plant in excess of0.50.poundsper ton ofacid produced, theproduction being expressed as 100% H;,SG4 

### sulfuric acid.

(2) It is unlawful for a person in Wayne county to cause or allow SO, emissions into the atmosphere from any sulfuric acid plant to exceed 6.5 pounds per ton ofacid produced,

(3) Compliance with this limt! rule shall be demonstrated using 40 C.F.Rpart 60, appendix A, reference test method no. 8, adopted by reference in R 336.2004(1)(1). R 336.1405 Emissions from sulfur recovery plantslocated within·Wayne·county. Rule 405. Atsulfur recovery plants located in Wayne county, a person shall not cause or allow the emission into the atmosphere ofsulfur dioxide, sulfur trioxide, or sulfuric acid from anysuch 

### sulfurrecovery plant to exceed 0.01 pounds perpound ofsulfurproduced. R 336.1406 Hydrogen sulfide emissions from facilities located within Wayne county. Rule406, (l) 

### Aperson in Wayne county shall not cause or allow the combustion ofany refinery process gas stream that contains hydrogen sulfide in a concentration ofgreater than 100 grains per 100 cubicfeet ofgas without removal ofthehydrogen sulfide in excess ofthis concentration. (2) When the odorofhydrogen sulfid·e is found to exist beyond theproperty line ofa source, a person in Wayne county shall not causeo.· allow·tl'e concentrationofhydrogen sulfide 

### toexceed 0.005 parts per million by volumefor a maximum period of2 minutes. R 336.1407. Sulfurcompound emissions from sources located within Wayne county and not previously specified.

Rule407. Both ofthe following apply to process and fuel burningequipment at a stationary sources located within Wayne county to which the pi'Ovisions ofR 336.1401 toR 336.1406 do not apply.

(a) A person shall not cause or allow theemission into tire atmos!flrere gaseswith" a ·concentration of'· · SO, greater than 300 parts per million by \'olume, which shall be corrected to 50% excess air.

(b) A person shall not cause or allow the emission into the atmospheregases with a concentration of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or a combination thereofgreater than 15 milligrams per cubic meter, 

### which shall be corrected to 50% excess air.

# j 

# J I· 

### F.3. Combined Strikethrough bold version as submitted for approval.

R 336.1420. Applicability determinations, definitions, and permitting requirements underCAIRS02 

### trading program.

Rule 420. (I)As used in this rule, "CAIR" means clean airinterstate rule. (2) The provisions of40 C.F.R. §97.202, §97.220 to §97.224 and the opt-iu provisions of40 C.F.R. §97.280-to §97.288 (2011) are adopted by 

### reference in this rule aud arc applicable to11iese rules. Copies of 40 C.F.R. §97.202, §97.220 to §97.224, and §97.280 to §97.288 are available for inspection and purchase at the Department ofEnvironmental Quality, Air QualityDivision, 525 West Allegan Street, P.O. Box 30260, Lansing, Michigan 48909-7760, at a cost as ofthe time ofadoption ofthis rule of$76.00. Copies may be also obtained from the Superintendent ofDocuments, U.S. Government P•·inting Office, 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC20401, by calling 1-866-512-1800 or by accessing their online bookstore at http://bookstore.gpo.gov at a cost as ofthe time ofadoptionof this rule ($66.00). The standards cau be viewed and/or printed free ofcharge at http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov.

(3) Each CAIRSO, source, as defined in 40 C.F.R. §97.202 is required to apply for a CAIRpermit in accordance with 40 C.F.R. §97.220 to §97.224. This permit shall be administered in accordance with the procedural requirements ofR336.1214 and shall be incorporated into the facility's renewable opemting permit as an attachment.

### G.1. Wayne County Air Pollution Control Regulation, Article VI excerpt. G.2. Wayne County Variance- Minutes from Board of Health meeting July 29, 1981. G.3. Wayne County Air Pollution Control Ordinance 1985, Chapter 8 excerpt.

## I 

## I I 

## I I 

## I

### G.1. Wayne CountyAir Pollution Control Regulation, Article VI excer,pL ...



# WAYNE 

# COUNTY AIR 

# POlLUTION CONTROl REGUlATION

WAYNE COUNTY DEI'AflTMllNT 01' HEALTI/ .\li:'rl'iman noad Woist\ Mli::l1icPn

**~IUJZ** WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF HEAI.'fll F'rRnk T. Uttlllga, ,O.,f,O. KlllhryJlt.McCullough

f-'a11l If,Muslct!, M.D. George M. O'llr/en,M.O.

**Gr.r:~ltllne O'Lo~n.** 

### G.1. Wayne
..Caunty Air Pollution Contro!.Reg.ulation, Ar.tic!e. 

### \<1 excerpt

.UITICI.I> \'1 K\JIS,_IO:\ 1.1.\IIT.WIO:'iS .\:'iO PHOIIIBITJONS



# "

## G.1. Wayne County Air- P01lution Control Regulation,. ArticleVI excerpt."'

Section 6.3

**~<:mission** of Sulrur Conlpounds. Sr-clfc:m I$,3A Fuels and.Emlssfon.s.JteJarJng to flower Gt:httallon,"Sienm'· Generation. Space Heating, nnd Sen•lce Water llt:Etlng. 1. No person shaH cause or perniH lo l>e,butned ILWI \t'hose sulfur

conlent exceeds lho suJrur fn (ueJ

**llmll.tltlo~** schedule. 1 il, No person shnll import, sell,

**pur~hasc,** c:<chungo, deliver, s!orc,

tranf:port, or

**c~f~r** for sale or exchange, ruel!or burning In tfle CoUJ"!Iy whose sulfur content exceeds tho suUur In fuel Jimltallon .schedule. :1. Auy person who supplies fuels Mntalnlng more than O.S percent

sulfurbywelgh( dir<.•clly to a U!ier Corburning In the County shflll keeprecords ofthepercentsulfurbywelgbl contained In such fuel by dntcdclivcrcd, quanuty, and lo whom sold. Such records shall bo

**~wnilnble** for revlow 

## br lhe Division,

**~.** Sulfur in fuel Hmfla.tlon schedule: 

# "

### G.1. Wayne County Air Pollution Control Regulation, Article'II excerpt.

BMISSIONOFSlJLF'VR COMPOUNDS SULFUR lN FUEL, PERCENT DY \\'EIGH"J'

**~lCfCII~e- J?ll.t~_**  . Ft!ef

**tJ~e** lly Fud 'fypt t\IJg, I, Aug. 1, Aug. I, .\ug. 1, Aug. I, !fin! 

### una 1!171 um; mr.

**~~I«:!**ric PUlverized Coni 2,.50 2.00 1.50

**1.2~** 1.00 Power plant Olher Coal LOO 0.75 0.50 

# '·"' ·-{l,.&Q.7_. & central f)/sflllale OJI 0.30 IJ.JO 0.30 0.30 0.30 steam gcncra· No. I and No. 2 lion, Jnelcd· Crud!! & H(!avy 1.25 LOO 0.70 1!.10 O:"JIJ/.fi tng G\lvcmml'nl oil, No, -1, S, 6 planl5.

**~.** Rcsld.cnllal Coal 0.75 

### o."1 (1.50 0.3() 0.30 & commercial DlsUJI&tc Oil 0.30 0.30 o.:10

**0.~0** (.l.:JO

**~p:~ce** and No, 1 1md No. 2 Wilier healing Crude & tle:wy 1.25 1.(.11,1 0.70 0.70

**Or70/.~** oil No• .J. S. G All other Cool LOO 0.15 0.50 0.&0 MO. 7S uses not r:>islillale OJI 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 specified No. I and No. 2: ab<we Crude & heavy 1.2.5 1.00 (),70 O.i'O MIJ,H oil No.4, 5. 6

### G
..1. Wayne CountyAir Pollution Control Regulation, Article.VI. excerpt.

5• N" JX'fl'ion

**~h~JI cuu~¢**  or permit a discharge Into tho il!ll\I)Sphr:rc frl)m any

**~!ngJe** rue·/

burning sot•rre ol emission whalsoc"\·cr sulfur dioxide In

**(:Xces~** of the sulfur dim.,..lde ronCI.'illraliou in t>xhauSI

**~as** schedule. li. Su!(ur dioxide concen!nltion in exhaust gas sehcdul[!:

**_1-:~IISSIU:\'** 01' .:l'l.fl'lt

**('O,\If'Ot:~'[>!j** Sl'LFL'R DIOXIhE

**l~'l:XIIAL'ST** G,\S. PAI1'i'S PER

**~** ;\llLL/0:\ Jl\'

**\'OLIJ~TB** CORHESTEm 'rO !iO rEHt:ENT

**E'~t;-~SS** .\JH
· Eflr:cli\'f' Dati

**f'u~l** l'sr by fud '1',\pt ,\ug. I. ,\ug, I, ,\ug, I, 

### ·'"g:'·

**l~ii** l!rl Ifill !J'i:'> Eledrk Pnln•rhed Cllal IW3 1100 li2S 100 powrr plant Oih"'r coal. 

### sso l20 

# '" '"' & Ct'nlro1l

**Pl~llll:th.·** Oil f;.t() 120 

### uo 120 slellm gcnNa· :-ioJandZ lion, llll'lud· Crude &

**Ju:·.w~·** 

# ""

**~{10** "0 

# ""

**in~** Gon·rnmcnl oil. :-.'o.

**~.** b. l'i plants

**RF~idcnfl<ll** Cool 

# "' 280 

### no 120 & commerdal Di5llllale Off 120 

# I 120 120 120· sp<'!ce anrJ Xo. I and 1 water hl"aling Crurfe I<

**/,ea~·y** 

## .! 

# '" 230 .u

**-~-~ ~~·o** . .J,S.G Ml olhC'r ust>S Cv;ol 550 420 

# '"' '" no! l'pcdficd Dislilllli<" oil 120 l:lll JZ() 120 iib(l\'1,' :O.'o. l and 1 ()-udto & heal'_\' ,)C() 

### I <W 

# "'

**2-~0**

oil :-."o. ( 5, I>

**~.** ··-··- \ug. I.

1!110 

# '" "' 120 

# "'

·- 

# '" 120 " 

# ". '" 120 :!ill'l

### G.1. Wayne County Air Pollution Control Regulatiol'l 1

### Article.VI excerpt.

1.

**:~,** No person shilll causeor permit the

**bur,lln~** offuel in any fuel burning' equipment tuwlr1g n higher .wcragc sulfur

**COIJI~t** thrm the luel burnedduring the prc.vio ;s twelve !12) calendar months based on acornparable BTUcmien!. For the purpose ofdetemllnlng complla.11CC, the .av-.riige suHur contenl of l'lll fuel nmlluc!tu.sedduring each ofI hec.lir'lldar monthspriorlfl Augusl J, /071, shflll be determfrtd ty

**nycra~lng** the sulfur content ol all fuel used durJng each •:olcntfar monU1 on the b.'l.sisofpoundsof.sulfwpermilliCinDTU'she:tllng\'alucofthc- (ucl or fuels, whieh shall no( be 

### u, .' · .' ' · month (rom and nfter August J, 1971, whencompared with the some colendDr month of the previQUs ycl'lr, find dctcrmln!.!d upon !he same averflglng IJssis. h. Theusc o(ruc·J!; havingsulfurcontl'nlsflssci forth in lht> s.uJrur

-i1i "ftfC111mltallon s-cnc-dUIC'S1fnll'nolllllow dt·"grad:tlion in !he "-mass mte-(lfpi\rllculafo omission. 'lhc Division m.O)' tCCJU/re

Sf.IUrccemission tes-ts whichmaybe p-erformed by the Dh'lslon or under its supervision allhe expense of the owners ol such cqulpmC>nl ,·md JJ\3)' require the submits/on ofreporls lo thl' Division both hcforc and alterchanges flrc mntlc In lhc !>Ultur contcn( In ruel. x. Nopersonwhoinstalls new fuel burning equipment afterAnt:us! 1,

1972 shall c:\usc or pcrmfl the emls!ilon inlo the

**atmo~phere** of wlfurdioxldeexce-eding

**lhc~ulfurdlo~·tdr:**hl

**~Xht~U$1** r.us

**scheduJ~** slip\IIH!cd for August I, Wl6, !1, Ifthe measured sulfur dioxide Rir QUtiJIIy In the Countytneets

**lh~**

**n<'ee~snry** F'cdcrill ambient air qualily

**~;IAndnrd** he/ore im· p!emcnlation ofany e-ffectivedate in Sedion &.3A C-11 and G.3A tGJ. the Board ffill)' suspl'nd lmplemcnlal!on o( 1my potllon o( said schedule in whole or in p:ul tlpon t('asonullle cvldcmce that failure to implement such supplem•:nlary pro\·islon$ will not compromise achic\•cment and'or malntemmct of !he S"f;'(-ondnr>' F'•!derlll nmblenl nlr qualll)' stnnd11rd. Sf.'t:lion 6.Jfl

**E!<~cptloM.:** t. 'fhi>provisions ofSection 6.3r\ II) Rnd ti.3A !7) (M shoJI not apply

f(l any person who hilS rcceh•cd an Installation rw:rmll or ccr· li!ic!ltc of opc.>wtlon from the Division on a control dl!\'lce to desulturlzc slack gases. ;!, Theprovisionso!Scclivn6.M_Cll shallnot apply fo any pi>rMn who

US('S n comblnaffllJI Q( rucls In MlCh ratios 1'1$ to met! the suUur dioxide hi cxhi'IU5I ga. .. Sclwftdc ttntl StiCh pelsor. shall proeurc

### G.1. Wayne·CeuNty Air Pollution.centroi·Regulation, Article VI excerpt.

wrilten appro\·al from lht: Division for !hls cxccplloh. Tile aHownhlt' cmi:;sion will be based on the value In Ihe schedule lor the fuel h<nriug lhe hlghrr nl/owAOJe Jim!(. :1. TJu:•pro\'islom; ofSectionG.3:\ l21 shallJlol apply to<tnypcrwn who

lm,xrrls.Sflls.purchases,

**deliw~rs,** .!./ores, lnwsporl:i,or (l{fcrs for sale- or
**exchr~t~ge** fuel for burnillg In lhe Counly whoso sulfur con!cnl

**CXt'ccd.~** !hi' sulfur in fucllfmllation schl'dulc lo another (K'.rson who meers the re:qtlircmtulsofSectionG.3B CJ J, r;.3B 121. or whCl IHls received a \'tarlancc (rom lhe Dh•isiou. Stl!llor!-S.JC SuHurfc Add Plan!s:

1. No personshall cnuw or penni! sulfur

**dioxl~!!** mil gos cmf::;slons

hrto !he {ll.uo!'J)herc from su!!uric r.dd .twnufaclurlng_plnnfs lo

**exec!!d-6.~·** pnuwJs-(icr lolfof·ncid p!'OilUcC:d.

-

**~** · · - '!. r{tJ )*rson shall cause or pur-mit sulfuric ftdrl, inrludlng .:;-ulfur

lrfnxidc, emiss/om• lnlo I he- atmM>pln•re lo exceed0.70

**pound.~** per fi)Jl of Held produced, SC'CtiOn 6.3D S\llfllr flc{'O\'ti'Y Pl:..nfs: No person shall C/11\Se (.If"perm!I !he

**crnls~ion** lulfl lht> atmosphere Clf wl(ur d/oxlde, sulfu.. trioxide. or sulfuric ndd from exlsHng sullur rec-ovcny plant to exc.eed0.1·2 pounds JlCt pound ofsuHurprodUl'l'd.orn.tH poundspt!rpound t•1r,.u... ·· ·orlu\'crlfrom a phllll com;h'uded n(!('r July 22. 1971. Si.>cllon 6.3E l"clro/cmn

**Rdlnin~** r\cih·lues: No person shall CII:USC ()f JX'trnU the comtmsl/on of an)' refinery

**pr<"~c<•!>.<;** gas slrearn lbar.contains.-.

**h~·dr-oge.n** sulfideInf:onc:-enlmllm• gr-entcr lllllll Hk't

**~rains** pel'hundred<'ublc ftN

## or

**f:<~S** wilhoul remo\•al ofthi' hydrogen s'-llfide ill excess of Ibis con· crnlrallon, S"ci/C>II 6.JF llydrngcn Sultldt: When lhe odor o( hydto[!en wWd(l: is found loexlsl

**~yond** UwproperlYline o(the source, measurements shall be tak<·n lly !he mcUJod

**~et** forlh In Sccljon G.3U (41 and II IMM;UI·cd levels o! hydrogr.n sulfid(l arc found lo be In cxccs..'t of o.oos paris per million by

**\'trlum~** for a maximum period of lwo 121 consecuth•c minutes, lhe person {'auslng or **~rmllflnl!** such emissions lnlo I he

**atmosphcr~** shall he deemed In dolfllion of !his sectlull. Seclfon6.JG SomtNXot Spedflcally Ni'ltltd: No person shall ctmscor pr.rmrl lhc emission inlo the atmosphere from any single source gases ("Onfnfnlf1g more lhau :wo pilrls per million sulfur dloXfM nor· nlort I han IS milllgroms rwr cubic rueter of ,ml(uric ncld or sl1llur trioxide or ., com· 

# "'

### G:1. Wayne·County Air Pollution·ControfRegulation, Article.VI·excerpt.

bin.don th;n:cf. Provid.:d bwtvcr

**th~l th~**  **fur~_o'JlS'** li:rr ..**r.2.~e>n> ~h;lJ**  not 31'J'IY to <;"!J.JHio:u; in S«rio·a 6.3.-\ 11-.:::<"-'e..h 6_·w.

**.S~cli'l'll** '· lH

**.'!lelh~** ol Mruurem&r>l: Me:hods for

**sar.~pliog:** cn:.is.sions covm:.:l in this arJ:;!e sh3.1! k as tcltd khw. lhese rr;&ods

**~boll** k

**~.:.S~d** as a

**g~:r.~**...al!;.tidc, bu: m:1y k modifkd c. 1djcl1ed by 1l1e D:ire.;lor tll

**~uil $p~dfi~**  $ml?:inz

**co~ditirm.$** or r.e: di l>-'..s!d upon &wd prad!cr. judgn:ent. ;u,d

**e.'<~fience.** Sulfur In

**F~l** Atul)1is: n. Ct-al: Sampling and analysh ·-f

**c~'cl** MTMD:m. h. Oil: Stl.lldard m¢thod of te>t for solfur in r-etro!eun1 oil& c\STM ·

.-. 1551. ;!... SuJfyr Dloxid<: in suck gas onalyiil! Publie

**He~llh** Service

**hlbliC;~tion** m·Af>IHI%51 App:ao!ix B, p.p. 8S·7. S:.:lfur

**Trio~~** in 1'lltk p.s amlysi;: Sulicrlc md in t:Jcl: J;a$ ar..:llpis: Publie-

**H~lili S~r'!oitc**  Publin:ioil !}9$> AP·I3' I J\}65 1 App-:r..di" B, p.p_ 85-7. 

### + Jlydrogttl Sullid: Au.l;.s!.J.:

**M~thybe- lll~e**  \!t'!hoi.l, S:-:m • .I,. C.. EJ. "Air Pollu1ion." Vo:: n,

**~econd** ed. .969, p.p. 'll;-{l.o. As

**11:~eJt.;:heJ** by:

**~.:\!.$.Budd** :c:.d It A. Dcwick.A;...**!~~~~ tr~mie<l**  :!4.1536

**u~:;.21.**

**h.:'>!.li,Jncc-b~.~l.)!Bra\"U!l'an** v-.J S. llothhriser,

**A~;aly~is**

**Chemic~! 2f!.JJ.I'P!~i~.** 

### ·· G.2. Wayne County Variance.--Minutes from Board.of Health meeting July.29,. 1981.

Board

**~~ers** ptesent WCTe: HINUiES

Carmhsioner 'I'1'I..oo.u PreSMU Ch.d-nr.a..n Dr. Ou:..rlu S, Mon:<m, V!c:e tha.trman Mu L, au.!n<r1 H.D, Mrs, :>Ltrie lJoyus SEP \ 8

## m\

..U.So proscr.t: .,.;ere: Dennis J, Dil'oo'I'Jrtil 1

**Publi~** HdJ.th Dinc:tor John 

## s. Stock,

**Depu~** Dir•ctor


# ·- Y!cl>y !!artinih, Public HeUth Nhlnistnt:or GlJM Brown, DirKtor 1

**EnVi~t.a.l** Hn.lth DiVis!C!U Alw Gro..O.rr, Hotocroloi<Ut, Ai:r Polluncn Conrrol Div. HrA Morton .Sterllnt, Det:roi-c

**Edison~** Skiles Boyd, Detroit EdisUl Cotapany 13tuu R, Ht.«n 1 Detroit Edison CC1tt&!WY Jeny

**~HJ'i.Ch,** MRrath.oll Oil Caopmy Lany Oha.h.ia.n, }tanthDn 011 CQ'Irpany Richard S:tle, Wayn..e County

**Pl~lVd**..

**~** Cormbdon. I , Al'P!\llWJ, OP /<n,UTilS IJfON niE )otlON OP DR,

**~.** SUPPC!mn BY DR,

**~ORTeN,** llill HlMJt1!S OF 'rnli liU'!IXG OF 1\E:>.'<ESMY, JULY 29, 1911 1,-£.'\1! APPROVED, U, :::<mSICN OF TiiE

**sutFUR£1.\i~Ft.fE.L** BfSU!;;-..ete..'.TS Hz. l>il..,-orU introduc.ed

**~fr.** A.U.n Groonbtn·r of tha Air Pollution. CoutTol Division,

**~lr.** Gru.flbtt'J raviwe-d th-e JN.tl!lritl th&t .,,u vruent:&d to th6 J;oa.rd. nb:tive to the Rll.!ur•in..fucl :ProVilion..!J of W Air Pollution Con1:rol P.erJ.Iatim. Hr, Gr1umb•rJ stated that: a rtqut.s( had. boen re<....ivtd fran the Utn'thon Oil CctJpany co cJlmp the rost:rlctlo:nJ. in tht. sul..fur

**~nunt:** o! No. 6 full oil from l.()t to 1,25 pt'('Cel'\'t and We a. Ye<tU.Ut n..d bee.n ucdved from t>.ttOit Edi.Jon

**~•ttuestini'** thu the 3oa:rd onca •f:U.n suspend the r-e.duction 

### ot th• 5\ll.fu:r
..:in..f\;el !J..;:nita.tions and t.M

**corre.sp~mdi.ng** .s'..tlf'ur cU.o:dde o.Wun ru

**~antT.&dOhl** ra- "uircd by the

**~'Xi.st:i!li'** re,W.ation, . !>Jr, Gnmber: :;u.t.cd th4t.t. tho Ai'l' Pollv.tJ.on Control 1H.vision dol'l$ not

**ore~nd** thf increase

**re-qW~nfd.** by W )tanthon Oil Ccrapa.n.y. He then revi.I'W-d, in deu.il,

**t~** n3..'Jotl.S for such. He u.id

**t~t** t'-1'0 aiT" poUutiOJ'\ epUodet oe.t;Ul"Nd 

# durihf

**~he** Sprinr o! 1981

**~hat ~e.sulted**  in

**~6~~** Violation of

**~he 2~**  hour

**5ulfu~** diox

**~** sta.nd2:rd ar.d th.a't t."'e r.;cddling ::..an"itd ¢u't by t.."l.e Dtt.roit EcU.sQI\ Canpany 1 ula-t.i.ve

**~.3** its Tl!:!l\.!.en to Ult )!ieh{&a.n. ,Ul" Polluticn Control Co.om.iuion to bl.:r.1 ::! •.3 perctnt s.J.lftlr

**~oa!** at

**1t:~ ~lof\l"OI**  PoM=r Plant indie.a.ted ?OttntiU Viola.c!c;:ns c:! t:he so.. !t.tnda:'d i,r, ilOLyne Co;ll..T.:.;.·. ,

**~lr.** Greenbarg clarified th.. ,c.££ 'r8J>Or':.

**~.·h..ich** eou!d. rive the Lidiution that the !>lonrot: Pcn.·er ?lant U th.e :sole con- tributor t.o ti'l• 11\edd predict.ec!. 

## so., violations. 

## rn-e ellission ilWtm:oT)" used in !:het l'l)::)dd l.-a.., no't. rest.rlc:t•d to >!oilro• Pv.;er Pllll\t Out incll!dtd .sour<:os of 502 !."\ h'.!.:·'ll"' neiihboring !>licldi&n Countie-s. Ohio and

**Sout1lt.-es~** Cntat"io. The Monroe

Wayna CountyVarlance • Mltlu!es f1om 7/29181 Board ofHea\lf)

**MeeUO~** Page 1of 12

## G.2. Wayne Co.unty, Variance
..- Minutes from Board of. Hea.lth meeting..July 29,..1981 .



## .

# '.

,,, 

# '"

**'!~** • Po..,er Pbnt

**~** not tho solo ecntr!but:or to 

### the pt«Uott<l 

## so, '"iolltlo!U, In

**~ct~** c..'lere l.'Ore other soutce.s

**t.~t** 

### contribuud I\On the:: 

### t.M Monroe Prt..·c.r Pla.nt·

**~--** 

### sraud thot 

### the Division ,,.;,11 <01\t!Jiut 

### to nollitor 

### tho looot!oM 

### ox FOtOl\till-1 viulatio!U Uld, in tht futuro, •-oUld Tepcrt biok to the llott<l of t!oJ.ttn ._. to

**~oil**other 

### they •-ould 

### nc.<>:I\W\d 

# w thong• in tl-..t Uitihtlotu. )IJ', Ohan!M sct.tod t:,.,t tJ,o ro.uor.s for 

### tlu )lanth011 request involvtd otonom.!C< 

### sin« the 

### company 

### •·t.s haW.r to !Uo ""'•• No, 

## zoil to 

### oJx with tht 

### (1'\lde

**~~** the cn.ule av;.iu.blt. GOn'tin.UtiS to ha.ve hJ..Iher

**C:cmc:M~ndons** ¢f S\ll£\J.r dioxid.s

**~** Iha Boa.Td tll$CUS'Ud the

**H<~t'ilthcn** 

### rto.uts:t a.nd, ' I l.IPI:lN 'Dl!! )Ol'!CN OF DR. GAAn\D., .5UPI'O!r.EI! iiY DR, fPRm/1 •DlfOO.ll) 

## ,v;ncr:; Eoll. A

**~ourn** ct1 '!lll! )liJliJH:;tl 

### I'BPtST niAT 

### RESilUcrirns Ill 

### rue SUU1IR mm:l!T roR

**~.** 

### 6 f1ifL OIL 

### BE AAISE!) FIJU.ll.O Ptli.C<II1' 'TO 1.25 

### Pl:Rdm',

**~tr.** Sc:erlinf thttl 

### spokt on 

### boh.a.lt of

**~troit** f.dis-on a.nd L31:ph.a.siud th£1 c.ctl:f)lmt..s l\34 b)' Hr. Orunh•ti rtl&t!vo to tho H>nroe P01.-.r Plant, trrON 'Dl!!

**~PTIW** OF DR,

**~.** MPOJmD SY DR. )0RTC:t; 1 THE J!O,W> C()l.;aJRREl) :•Trrl mz;

**~!Jl!Sf** OF THil r£rnllrT E.DlSO.'I o:.M'AWi · U'irell nil! PRDvlSlaiS OF !iECUOII 6.::.>.9 OF W



### ~ CWJm' AIR ror.I.llr!OO C(X..'rOOJ. wm..\TIOII, THE i<A'(l;]!

**CC~";1Y** &OAAD OF HEALTH Allr!P!UZE.D THll SUU'Vi\-lli-!11E.t. SPE,!FIC.\TICNS Ill SEC!1o.-: o.l\(J) .-1.\1) EWIV.-\LEi1 SULFVR

**OlO.~IllS** ({));c;l:l."fR.\T!O.'IS 

### ;:1 t:®J.IST

**~** SC!!EJ:(JUS L\ Si;CTIOII 6.1.A(6) ·.IS !'OI..t.CI>S: Ml USE 8\"

**Elt~c ~·r**  

### plant & c:entral st:lm--- · sonor.tion, including

**gcv~~nt** plants 

### ML1YPES 0.15 

### 1.no Rhidl:nthl 4 '"'"'""dol Ctudo. hUV)' 

## on Nos. J, 

## s, 4 6 1,00 All other use-s not Co.a.l 0, iS 

### '1'«i!ied aoov• Crud• &

### h ..



### ,y oil

**~os.** 

### l, 

## s, &

### 6

**~!=-, G~~ti'\Qetl**  

### -=hem di,·uued.

**br!e~l:.• t.~e**  **'""L":~;~.t!on** 

### n!.J.t:tv" :o

**rafi~t!.al** coJ.l

**r~,** 

### . UPO: t.-l<

**~OTICN** OF DR. G.-\IUl.'iER, SUPPOR!'E.D 8Y DR.

**HlRTC>.~,** TH!:

**~:>.YliE** CC(Jl.1Y IDA.'U> OF

WiJyr.o

**Coon~;Vat1;'ll){-ll ·lliinL>:e~**  **frcm71~0/61** O.O;tidof

**1/c~Oh !.Ice~)(~** 

**P&:~<>2ofl2**

### G.2. Wayne County Variance - Minutes from Board of Health meeting July 29,.1.981.

**~rri** .l.lm-l:lRI:ES Tel:



### 1~\>l! etxf.<Ti AIR POLI.UT!Cii CCUtM!:! DM$!CN TO 

### Pn'<IT COAL

**ill;~** TO

**FUR!:!',~$.!** /..\Jl OFFER fOR SALS fOR USo L'< 1\-\\"" CM'TY, C¢..1!.S crur.w.n.i:; v? TO 1.01 SY liS!GllT SUI.fUR C<>\Tf:Yt I:i RES!Dl':IIL>J. .J..\1) CCHmRCt>J. SPACE AND 

## wAIT!\

**~T!:<G APP~!CX!IO/iS,**  11!. Rl:z"ORT Oli PUBLIC HE.\IU1iG C>.Y C!n' SAND ;..

VD L1. Vi)flLL CJ:J,rP /..

W >.PPLICATJCN 10 TH!! DEl'.!Jt11'\E'<7 OF NAl1iiW. RESWRCES FOR A SOLID lOS!l!

**L\.~1lFlLL**

**~lr.** ou,·orth sutod thot h> and 1/r, Bt01on 

### had visited the siu of 

### tho City s.ru1 Md Landfill CCJ:pny. Mr, Sto;k thll'l TepOn:ed on tho heniot tho;...._, 

### c:on• due

### co<! by tho Dop&n:liW!t 

### ol N&turtl 

### Resoureu relu.!VII to tho

**~llUt** 

### ot City Sand and l.u\dfill !or an exp•ndon. He suud thet ujor c.on<ern.t of tho J>OOl>le 

### included the 

## =< mfflc, tho nouo, 8Jld

**cC>~~Um** rtl&civo to d.i!oue. 

### TM
- J:l.z:terial th&t l<'a.5 subrutted at the hear.ing on discue

**prev11~** jn the h<me.s a..">"Ound tJut site loo"U riVtn. to Dr. Polh:1.J.tki tor

**funh~J~r i.nVesti~t:ion.** 

**~!x'.** aro'Wil .then sut.eC.

**tl'-~t** .1-..dacisi.on 1\'0U!d

**.beL~** by t:h.e -,!)ep&t'\Al\tnt ()£ , Xat:Ural R..s:sourcu a.lur " :s-o d.s.y period

**~&H** the matter loo'8l'll re.fsrnd to the )i!thitUJ

**Env!ro"""M~** Review !lOud,

**~lr,** Oil\o'Ort..i asked \.'hethtr thJ Board .,..auld. ldsh -to add. to the

**llrlt~** eaDMnu tl:at •"Ould ba Ndo b)" the Department in 

### r.he ><rituh rocor<U of tho N>ll.c !lear• i."'r. The cwmen.ts 'kill lie distributed a.t the

**llt~** Bo&rd. meotinr !or fu:rther cor.m.en:t. Hr. S:elg o£ the Pla."Vling Comdnion. M'ho M.d. been pre.sent &t the hearing, f:.u-t.i.er corrrr.cnted on it.

**~** stat-ed that

**th~rt** '-'U a;.t.Ch conc:ttm Rll\OJ\Z thJ resiant:s a.bout the lQJ\di!.ll, He briefly duedPed othc:;r lm.d.fill.s in cltt Ceu.itY

**'"'hie.~** sew.ed tO be

**op.era.~in"** \.lith little C:Oflml.m..i:ty oppositio.n. IV, lS$0·81 Cc.\1R.\Cf \,;r,j M!

**~UQliG.>.V** Dti'.-\RT?<!!;T OF PlJRLIC HEAL11! FOR 

### mC • piU!.SC;Ill "1

**~tr.** Dill(Orth revil!wt:d tM

**m.erubr~nt** to 

### the

**~ntra.ct** b&wcen the Health Depart.. r.l!nt: 11\d the

**~lic.hi.iZ.J'J** PcD.u'O'I'Ant of Public Kea.lth !or

**~aC•P9.fSC\.D** !o-r the 19$0·$1

**~·ear.** He s;:ec.t!iul1y ca.llt><i ottont!on to the clunies !rom 

### tho pro·' vious yur'

### s agre:I!.'Mnt, iifCN TEE )XJT!C.' OF DR. G.<.'Ul'<CR, SliPfQRTED BY DR. }OJIT(t(, Il1E BO.-IRD >.PI'!lDVED ll-:0

**.~'IE:<J;HE,\"C** TO frill .l.GRID!E.7 Bf11\'WI TilE H!CHIG.>.V

**W~'l** OF PIIBLIC HIW. ."!'ri /..\ll TI!E WAY:>"!>

**~Ti** HEJJ.lli DEl'AAD!f:\1 FOR l1lE ll>IIC·PRESCID PToj&c' FOR 1980·81 :>i:"rl. T<{E

**~~E;\ST,l.\1JI~G** TKU SU!TA!!U

**.J..<Jll\G£\~-\15,**II'IU. 92

**)~** TO. Pl!.0\10E. 

## s:r.m:

**.=i~.:;.',CI.l.:-** s-.,.?FORT fCC\ rr:E ClOSC:CV'l" CF

**i.~** )I!C..PRE..SC-\0 PROOAA'I TI-:RetiaH ,SEVI"f)QH:.ct 30 1 1131.

**Wa~·M CounlyVsri~noo**  • Minv!as f10m 7121!181 Doard of

**He~!!h Meelin~**  Psge 3oll2

### G.2. Wayne County Variance - MinutesArom.Board of Health meeting..J.uly. 29,.1981.



### +

**~**

**~** 

# ., t· ':! \', OlD BUSC.'!'SS 

### :\one. Y1 , li!;W BUS

### MSS 

### None. \'lI '

**)J)J'CUR.~lE2',"''** 11PCt1 Til!: IIJI"!CN OF llR. Hltm:JI1 

### &/l'l'OitlilD 1fi NP$, &o\U.S, 11l!!

**~** liAS

**m=~** J3 11:so A.H.

VH/rc

DATI:D: ,...

**~** ;.:. •• 

### "' 

## ... ,

# .

Wayr.e Coun!yVariance. Mlnu!es from 71291B1 Board of HealthMeellng Page4oll2

### . --

**'~** '' 

### G.3. Wayne CountyAir Pollution Control Or,dinance.1985, Chapter 8.excerpt

WAYNE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 0/lDINANCE

AN ORDINANCE to abate air pollution in the County of Wayne and to provide for Hs admlnlstraHon and enforcement: to prescribe the powers and duties of the Wayne County

**Depart~.** ment of Health·Air Pollution Control Division and its Director: and to provide for penalties and remedies. IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY·TllE PEOPl-E OF THE CHARTER COUNTY OF WAYNE I ..

### G.3•.

**Wayr.~e.County** 

### Air Pollution Control.Ordinance 1985, Chapter 8. .excerpt

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAOE Chapter I DEFINITIONS , . , ... , ............................ . Chapter 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS ENFORCEMENT .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

**Ch~pter** 3 .. ............. 8 Chapter 4 AIR USE APPROVAL AND PERMITS .. , ......... , ........... I0 Chapter 5 EMISSION LIMITATIONS ANDPROHIBITIONSPARTICULATEMATTER . , ........... . Chapter 6 EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONSChapter 1 SULFUR·BEARING COMPOUNDS ........ . EM!SSJO'N LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONSEXISTING AND NEW SOURCES OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS , .............. . Chapter 8 EMISSION Lir-.UTATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS- . ' .... 16 . ' .... ' ......I7

. 20 MISCELLANEOUS , ... , ...................... , ...... 2I Chapter 9 SEALING OF m.HSSION SOURCES . , . , . , .... , , ...... , ..... 24 Chapter 10 VARIANCES •.. , .••...... , , ..••.........•........ 25 Chapter II TESTING AND SAMPLING .............. , , , .... , , . , , ... 26 Chapter 12 CONT!NUOUSEMISSIONMONITORINGAND'RECORDJNG , .. , , , , .. , . 2'1 Chapter 13 AIR POLLUTION EPISODES Chnpter 14 APPEALS APPENDICES A. DIVISION REQUIREMENTS FOR EMISSION SOURCETESTING B. INSTALLATION PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS C. DIVISI0N·:i10DELING RE<:2UJREf!'IENTS D. DIVISION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTINUOUS EMISSION MON1TORJNG AND RECORDING E. DIVISION FEE SCHEDULE . ' •• ' .. ' ' . ' 28 ' ' .•••.... ' ' ' 31

### G.3. Wayne CountyAir Pollution Control Ordinance 1985, Chapter 8 excerpt Chapl(w 

## 8 EMISSION Lll\JITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONSl\IISCELLANEOUS Sectlou 801. lNCORl'ORATEll STATERULES The 

### following Michigan Rule• as promulgated on **F~brual')•** 22, 1985, 

### are incorporated by reference and made. a part hereof. Forpurposes of lhis Ordin.ancel the term "Division" shall replace lhe term **h{_~ommk,.ion"** where\'Ct H appears ill S\tCh 

### incorporate.d rules. A. 

### Rulo 901. 

### "Air contaminant or water vapor, wlJCn prohibited;"AACS R 336.190

### l. D, Rule906. "Diluting and concealinsemissions;" AACS R 336.1906, C. Rule910. 

## ---· D. Rule911. "Malfutlction abatement plans;" AACS R 336.1911. 

### E. Rule91Z. "Abnonnnl <'<Jnditions nnd breakdown of equipment;" AACS R 336.1912. F. Rule 930. ('Emission of carbon monoxide from ferrous cupola operations;" AACS R 336.1930, Section 

### 802. ODOR 

### INTENSITY SCALE 

### When applying Incorporated State 1\ule 901 

### :to exi.stl.i){;: t)dorous 

### emissions, Division persoHnel



### .. shall clnsslfy the intensity 

### of the 

### odors according

_to 

### the foJJowing scale: 0- A concentration of an odorant which 

### produces 

### no sensation.

**I~** 

### Concentration Wltich isjust barely detect· able. 2- A distinct and deflnltc odor whose 

### chari1cteristic is cle.rly

### <ktectablc. 

### 3- Au odor strong enough to cause a per:-on 

### to atlem\JL!O :woid it

### completely. 4- An t){ior 

### so strong

**;~s** 

### to be overpowering and intolerablefor any length oflime. 21 An odor intensity of 2 or more shall constitute a violation of incorporated Statu Rule 901. Section 803. Fl>DERAL

### EMISSION 

### STAND· ARDS

### AND PREVENTION OF S!GNJFJCANT DETERIORATION 

### A. New SoUttc Performance 

### Stnnd<lrds_ (NSPS).. A 

### person shall not c:ausc or permit ;m emission source subject to lhe pl'ovisions of tho Federal Clean Air 

### Act, and 

### tlte rules entitled '(St;mdards qf Performance for New Stationury Sourc-es," 40 Cf.R Part 60, 

### lo oXGoCIU nny nppllt-nble standard contaiM<i in 40CFR l'nrt 60, 

### unless a VNlh•er 

### Crom

**~uch** 

### rt>quirement has been tlccured pursuant to the provisions of Section lll(j) of the Ooan Ail· 

### AcL Tho rc<JUiroments of 

### 40 CFR Part 60, as promulgated on February 22, 1985, ore hereby lncorpolaled D)' rofc.ronco and 

### iitade 1\ 

### porr"heie.of. · · · D. National EmLo;sion Sfandn.rtls for Hazardous Air 

### Pollut<mls (NESHAP.<) A pt.rson shall not. o:msr. or permit an emis· sion sourCe 

### subject to the
**pro'\•lsion~** of 

### tlte Federal Clean Ai1' Act. :md the rules entitled "National 

### Emission Stondards for Hazardous 

### Air Pollutants,h 40 CFR Purt 61} 

### to exceed any app!ic;,blo 

### stnndard conlnined in 40CFR 

### Part 61. 'fhe requirerrwnts of 40 CftR Part 6J, as promul· gated 

### on F<,btunry 22, 1985, arc hereby incorpo: mted by

**n~fcrcncc ~nd**  made a part heteof. C. Prel'cntlon 

### ofSignific-Jnt Dotcrioration (PSI>). A 

### person sha!l not cnuse or 

### pe.nnlt a1}

**emis~** sion source subject to 

### the provisions of the Federal 

### Clean Air Act, and the rules entitled

**~~.Prevention** of Signit1cant Deterioration of Air 

### Qunlity," 40 CFR Port 52.21, to exce.ed any iippHcable sl4lndnrd **or··re·quir~lllcnt·** c:onlained in 40 CFR Part 52.21. Therequirementsof40 CFR Pari 52.21, as promulgated Oil Febmnry 22, 1985, He hereby incorporated by roference and made a parthereof. 

### D. Full Compliance. 

### A. 9erson. who owus..i}r .. **op~tiltcs,** an 

### emissio1l·

**~'Ourc-e** 

### complying 'Nith the emission JiJnitationl) und prohibitions of' subsections 803.A, B and C shall 

### not bo exempt from comJilying 

### wi!l1 the

**emi~.sion** limitations :mU prohibltionscontained

### irt this Ordinance.

### G.3
..'fl/ayne Countv Air Pollution Control Ordinance 1985,. Chapter 8 excerpt S<>otion 804. II'ASTE·IlURNING EMISSION SOURCE OH

**EQUIP~l.fu'\T** 

### A. Pt<>hiblllon.

**~~** 

### A pCrnon shall not C.a\i$D 

### or p-'2:-rmit, one )'ear 

### afte.r UJe. effce-th·c dare: 

### ofthis Ordlnnnce,

**th~ u.~-.**  

### tn"StaU.atk•Jt:" or ·op;:ratjon of·any VKiSI\i·buming

**cmls.sl<··l~** 

### S\1Ur(:fil or ?quipmunt cxco?Jlt; 

### I.

**Apjutnn~nt~** 

### c.ornmen:iu( 

### .and indus1r1uJ

**WJS.tc~b~trning** SOUJ'C(!S; 

### 2. 

### Crcni<1tory nnrl 

### pathol•){dt.uJ

**bmflitiJ~** 

### :>:}uipmcnt tksigncd 

### and m-Dd fot 

### the

### hurnine, of h1_111l:1n 

### and :ln[nHJl remains conS:l:itinA. of 

### cart.as.<=A.:S_,

**(ltJ~ans. ~nd**  

### solid nrp,.auk:



### \\'astc,~ frnm hofipitals,



### l~bont·

**toi·k~, ~h.,!!t-loirs..**  

### auimal 

### po1.llH1;c;, nnd simihll' cmissil'lli

**$(H.\rl!-(~s-;·** 

### tnincd in tl 

### m:mnc-rto as:sun:: CftmpliunoJ 

### with thL"; e.tnlfSJ(IH

**ltmlt~1tlr.Jns** 

### a.nd pr<Jhfbilions of this 

### Or<linan<'e. Stttion 805. DURNING OFCOALJJOR SPACE AND 

### WA'l'EH IT£1\.l'II\G 

## A' person :shaH not l1:IU9."?· Of 

### permit (Ill(!

**y~~r** 

### aflet the

**efJ~d.i\'c** dall' 

### of 

# u,;, Ordin.1ncc, 

### !he

**burnim;~** 

### ofcoal in ony

**rcs!dt;,~n[bJJ** 

### ...

**~omim~.r('.i<JJ,** 

### or soho<.1] huHdlng 

### li.1r tho

**pUriXf&~** 

### ofprl')Villins, sp;.wc or

**\V~lcr f,~ating.**  

### Section 80r.. DHY BLASTING A 

### pc-:rsotl

**$h~)]} ~~ot**  

### t.::rrm ...

**~** <)t 

### pc:nnit lhe. dry

**bJa::;t1nt~** 

### or dt!BniJlf: 

### of

**t-h·~** 

### exterior of tmy SUlJCLUf(:, 

### TJw own(:J or

**01~-rator** 

### of wd 

### llhhiti:·Jn nr

**.::J~;·m~ng** 

### cquitHncr;l 

### .shall at 

### the e-nd (I[ 

### e<.'!(!}) 

### shift dean up tlw sjtc 

### where blw;t_i_r;g is

**don~** 

### so as to

**prc~·c::nt** 

### the spent

**:::bra~ivc** 

### from L'1'-('.-oming !lirbomc Or Rc--!lltcrcd by the \virtd. 3. LiquhJ and

**f~iJ$00liS** WA>5tc-bunlin.ft equip· 

### me.nl

**OWiJ\.~d**

### ·;_tnrl 

### ope.raLcd 

### by tl1e. po:lOH t:;cnr-t'ati.ng 

### tt.c

**wask~** and

**d~~:jgnt:!-d** and 

### t!St.d 

### se>J,,Jy for !he burning of gmon>, Hquid, or sc!lli·Uquid

**w~slcs** 

### such a:; 

### !"m, Section 807. OPERATION OF CONTROL palnU:, Wh1eJ1lS and



### f"un'll~s. **gcmt~t'ated** at EQUJPI\lENT -lhl'; simte.

**J!?.{t£-..f~plt~cal sH-t'~----**  ·- - -·A -person shaH i101

**caust~** or

**pt~rmlt** the u.'ic or 

### 4.

**llntttin.t~** 

### v.•Jltipmtml 

### des[gne.d 1 

### md usect fm·

**op~mtion** 

### of any et.1isslon

**:;.ollH~t'l** 

### tor

**v.~hkh** 

### the dostiuotion of U:1itcd Stntcs

**C\lnt~n~.::y** (: ... 

### :;mlrol equipment is

**n:~tquirt-d** 

### lHl(k:r

**a;n~· Chupt(~r1** 

**not~;s** 

### or po.sl:i.J!C stamps; 

### -Sec-Bon or

**.sullre.;.~tion** 

### of this Ordln.tmc-e 

### unless such

**<:o~arol** 

### e.qujpm<fnt

**~~** 

### uliiL-::tJ-d tmd 

### Hlrdnt:lincd iu

**~ r:l~nn~r**  lo 

### assure

**~;ompll<Ul\.~C** with 

### tJw

**emi~sion** 

### ..

**!imitntir,:m~--** 

### a:1d prollibHiotU\ 

### of 

### lhis

**Ordln~lrH:e.** 

### 5. IJurning •;<llllJl!I'Od 

### tbsig.ncd i!ud

**US'~-<.1** 

### for lht' rcmo1•"l 

### tlf 

### irmilatlon J'wm el,c!rk molors,

**d~ctri(:td** 

### wire-s, or for dr:nning of

**stet~l dnw1s~**  {1, 

### Burning equipJ?Wn_t

**d~sL~ncd** 

### and used for Ito d[.;po"'l of sewage sludge, 

### sottrn or erit; 7. Mtmiclpal bum.in(: 

### equif>mcnl design<.t! :mel

**lto/~rl** 

### for tho dtlstnu;.tion of 

### rd'usc 

### which hus 

### .a

**rat~d** 

### pf:mt capndfy 

### in .exres1-: of

### SO !onsper

**O~Yi** or 8. 0 thor sp<:;¢a1 purpos-o waste-burning

**cq\lipmcnt~** wHh

**writt~n** 

### pvrmission ofthe 

### Dfrcotor. D, Sc:iling ofSource. 

### A pt!rSC,rl 

### ownlng or opcntin,g 

### aw.astc:..-lJurnlng 

### emission

**sourc~** 

### wl1ich is not 

## w be used or

**opcr~tcd** one ycn.r 

### after the effective dolo of this OrdiJ1anr.o shall soal

**lh~** 

### sanw no

**l~tc·r** 

### iha., 

### ono yetlr :lftcr the cflC.otive d:are ofthis Otdlllance. 

### C. Usc of Aulhoril.el.1

**W~otc·burnlns** 

### _Emission Sowcc. A 

### person shall ool

**c.au•~** 

### or permit

**ill~** 

### u'c or up<m1tion of any

**w.nst~>bumlnc** e-mkdon

**sotm:~** unle-ss: such cmis_.siOtt

**wur~c** js

**utiUz~{]** and

**m<1tn~** 

### .S<.•ct.\on 808. CHANGE 

### 011 CONDITIONS A 

### J'(•Json shall nol 

### call>-' or permit tho opcra-Uon of any cmissfon source: ln $U<.:h ::1 

### mdtnlt:r OE' ut such

**~** 

### rate in

**t~x.:::e~:.t** 

### of Hwt for whic.h f!n instuJ]ZJL:ion ptlrrnit ot ceriificat,-:. of 

### <•per..lion has b<en issued or conditioned. Scclimt 809. OPEN FIRES 

### A. l'wtLibiHon; E:xemptionB. 

### A pDrson 

### sbaJJ 

### not ignite,

**:;-alJ:;t~** 

### or .pe.rmit 

### lo he lgnHedf uth>w or maintuitJ an open fire. 11Ic f()Jlmv!ng trpes of

**op~r.** 

### frrcs are exempt

**t~rom** 

### the prohibition ofthh

**Sl~cHon** pro,·lded such

**ftn::~i ~1rc**  

### <:On\iucted in 

### ac.cor-diU)Ce wHJi

**HH~** 

### contlitions spedllcd b}' the Dil•ision and m;;o not injurlou; 

### to

**huma~** 

### hc:aHh, s:Jfcly or

**\Y{'.Han~**

### .. $Dfmut 

### Hfa; or

**property~** or unreasonably

**inb~-rfere** with the

**~omf'(>rtahl;}'** !Jn)\>ymcnl· of·

### Jifc. or

**propcrti·~** or 

### viofatt::. an)* -other lH.:cHr.:m of

### this

**Ordinanc~~.** 

### J. For the control of

**l~rop** 

### djst;!aso when tho Cotlnly

**·~rict!llllral** ag,,nt 

### dcdurl·s t11al 

### this is lho On[y 

### m::::ms m•aihJbfe, provlped Hw· County Qgrlct!l1ur.fll

**.agc.~1t** 

### ha." issm.;d a,.

### G.3. Wayne County Air Pollutior) Control Ordinance 1985..Chapter.8 excerpt

**p~!rmlt** 

### fot S.U.;.!h butriirJt;; 

### 2, Por tmiffing lircman Ol' 

### for

**H!s~Jarch** 

### in (ire pre\'cntion. provided t.he Dh•isfon 

### has ·',l:.h<e11 

### prlot writt<.·.rt .upprm•.'lJ; 

### 3. 

### !'0r the 

## lwruth;

**~afety** 

### i1nd wdfare 

### of the community when such

**t1Jo~** Me 

### lp.nJted by

**or~er** 

### ofamunidp.U fire 

### dcpartnwnt: 4. for 

### the nontJ.:.tmmcrcial 

### cooking of food for human 

### c:onsumptilm; S. Por

**-cercmoni~l** 

### or

**r~·c-rcatlon~J** 

### puq.;ore.s if prov«J

### I}' con

### trotle<) [ly a responsible 

### person and the fuel used is

**limit~.d** 

### to dry 

### woodl dry

**liill~et** 

### or

**~mukclc~s f~1cl;**  

### or 6. 

### i<or w:mnlng of worters who 1 NO.rk 

### prc

### dominan!l)' i.n lllc outdoorsif 

### tho ambient

**tcmperatur~.** 

### h lower 

### tltah 32 dt·grxs 

### Fahrt.nhcil nn<l 

### tho fuel is limited 

### to dt)' 

### woCH!, dry 

### p•pcr, or

**smok0le~s**

# ruur. &!ction 

### l.ll 0. USE OF HIPROl'ER

**!'UEI.~** 

### JN MOTOR VEHICLES A person orrctuilcr1 or his

**-t!:lllploy~t;!** c)r age-nl 1 'l.it

**whole.~ule purclWsl.'!r•t:on~umc.r,.or**  

### his r:mploycG 

### or agcn

### t.; shall n(}t

**~-c-llJ**

### ·
**d.IS1)\~JJSlj~** 

### or offer 

### rot ·sale:

**g:t.~oJiJl(! R:pre:s~IJted**  M be

**UJi](~~.dNJ~** 

### unless frUCh 

### gusoHn{: meef.s

**lh~** 

### deflncd

**r~~qufr.zHklilS** 

### fo: unleaded gi!.solinc; noJ· shntl r:: 

### pcr8a-n 

### lnlroduc:..\ 

### or C!iWic or

**~nnit the~**  

### hthoduction of 

### lcade:.t.l g.:uo

### lli1e into any motor 'lchk:Je- which (::; r.(lbeJe,d 

### "tfnf.cadcd Ua.soUnc

**Only/~** 

### or \ii.'hkh is eqtdppfld with 

### a gasoJJne tank filler iulet whkh 

### is

**do~lgnoil** for

**~h-~** jntroducHon of Jmk;1dn(l f,Us0Hne. A 

### per.mn or

**rct~HE:r~** 

### or his

**employe~** 

### or

**~&(!J1t,** 

### or wholt..S.111c purchasrr

**CDJlHiJJWt~** 

### or his

**~ll1}JIOyt>=t-** 

### or 3£.\!Jl

**r~** tihaH not

**~.quip** 11 

### de•;lt::.; for

**(Esptn.slfif~** 

### lc.;Jdr.d fuel tO muk1r\'chid-e-s 

### '.Vilh a JiOZtle

**\'ihi·~h** 

### would aUnw 

### illS(!ttion intrJ n

**g:-~soHJ:~** 

### tank 

### fi1Jcr inlet whi;;h 

### is de:;iJwr.U fur

**lh~** jntrodtK'-rion 

### of 

### unk"iidctl gasoline. ·