J-A01045-18

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

IN THE INTEREST OF: D.S. A/K/A 

D.D.G.S., A MINOR

APPEAL OF: R.S., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1836 EDA 2017

Appeal from the Order Entered May 11, 2017

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County 

Family Court at No(s): CP-51-AP-0000440-2017, 

CP-51-DP-0000647-2017

BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., OTT, J., and PLATT, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY OTT, J.: FILED JULY 09, 2018

R.S. (“Father”) appeals from the decree that involuntarily terminated 

his parental rights to his son, D.S. a/k/a D.D.G.S. (“Child”), born in December 

of 2014, and the order that changed Child’s placement goal to adoption.1

On March 8, 2017, the Philadelphia Department of Human Services 

(“DHS”) received a report alleging that Mother jumped out of a second floor 

window with Child in her arms while under the influence of phencyclidine. The 

trial court placed Child in the emergency protective custody of DHS on March 

____________________________________________

 Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

1 F.H. (“Mother”) did not file a notice of appeal from the involuntary 

termination decree or the goal change order, and she is not a party to this 

appeal. 
J-A01045-18

- 2 -

13, 2017. By order dated March 24, 2017, the trial court adjudicated Child 

dependent, and set his placement goal as return to parent. By separate order 

on March 24, 2017, the trial court found aggravated circumstances existed as 

to Father because his parental rights to two older children were involuntarily 

terminated,2 and directed that no efforts be made to reunify Child with Father. 

On April 18, 2017, DHS filed a petition for goal change to adoption and 

a petition for the involuntary termination of Father’s parental rights pursuant 

to 23 Pa.C.S. § 2511(a)(1), (2), (4), (5), (8), and (b). A hearing occurred on 

May 11, 2017, before the Honorable Lyris Younge, during which Child was 

represented by both a Child Advocate and a Guardian Ad Litem (“GAL”). By 

order entered on May 11, 2017, the trial court changed Child’s placement goal 

to adoption. In addition, the court entered a decree the same day involuntarily 

terminating Father’s parental rights. Father timely filed a notice of appeal and 

a concise statement of errors complained of on appeal. 

On May 25, 2018, counsel for DHS, the Child Advocate, and the GAL, 

along with Father’s counsel, filed a joint application of all parties to vacate the 

goal change order and involuntary termination decree and remand for a new 

hearing. The joint application arises after Father, through counsel, timely filed 

____________________________________________

2 Father’s and Mother’s parental rights to those children were involuntarily 

terminated on July 21, 2016. DHS Exhibit 7. Father did not file an appeal 

from the decrees. However, Mother appealed from the decrees, which this 

Court affirmed. See In the Interest of N.K.S. and F.H., 175 A.3d 427 (Pa. 

Super. 2017 (unpublished memorandum). 
J-A01045-18

- 3 -

an advocate brief, following this Court denying counsel’s petition for leave to 

withdraw and remanding for either a compliant Anders brief or an advocate 

brief, inter alia. See In the Interest of D.S. a/k/a D.D.G.S., 1836 EDA 

2017 (Pa. Super. March 8, 2018) (unpublished memorandum). DHS 

requested an extension of time to file its brief, which this Court granted. In 

lieu of filing its appellee brief, DHS, along with the Child Advocate, and the 

GAL, chose to file the joint application. 

Based on the parties’ joint request, and the record evidence 

demonstrating that the trial court entered the subject order and decree 

approximately seven weeks after Child’s dependency adjudication, we vacate 

the order changing Child’s placement goal to adoption and the decree 

involuntarily terminating Father’s parental rights.

Goal change order vacated. Case remanded for entry of a new 

permanency order maintaining Child’s placement goal of reunification and for 

further permanency review hearings in juvenile court. Involuntary 

termination decree vacated. Case remanded for entry of an order denying the 

involuntary termination petition.

Petition for remand granted. Rule to show cause discharged.

Jurisdiction relinquished.
J-A01045-18

- 4 -

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 7/9/18