PUBLIC LAW 104–250—OCT. 9, 1996 110 STAT. 3151

Public Law 104–250

104th Congress

An Act

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for improvements

in the process of approving and using animal drugs, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; REFERENCE.

(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Animal Drug

Availability Act of 1996’’.

(b) REFERENCE.—Whenever in this Act an amendment or repeal

is expressed in terms of an amendment to, or repeal of, a section

or other provision, the reference shall be considered to be made

to a section or other provision of the Federal Food, Drug, and

Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321 et seq.).

SEC. 2. EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS.

(a) ORIGINAL APPLICATIONS.—Paragraph (3) of section 512(d)

(21 U.S.C. 360b(d)) is amended to read as follows:

‘‘(3) As used in this section, the term ‘substantial evidence’

means evidence consisting of one or more adequate and well

controlled investigations, such as—

‘‘(A) a study in a target species;

‘‘(B) a study in laboratory animals;

‘‘(C) any field investigation that may be required under

this section and that meets the requirements of subsection

(b)(3) if a presubmission conference is requested by the

applicant;

‘‘(D) a bioequivalence study; or

‘‘(E) an in vitro study;

by experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate

the effectiveness of the drug involved, on the basis of which it

could fairly and reasonably be concluded by such experts that

the drug will have the effect it purports or is represented to have

under the conditions of use prescribed, recommended, or suggested

in the labeling or proposed labeling thereof.’’.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

(1) Clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 512(c)(2)(F) (21 U.S.C.

360b(c)(2)(F)) are each amended—

(A) by striking ‘‘reports of new clinical or field investigations (other than bioequivalence or residue studies)

and,’’ and inserting ‘‘substantial evidence of the effectiveness of the drug involved, any studies of animal safety,

or,’’; and

(B) by striking ‘‘essential to’’ and inserting ‘‘required

for’’.

Animal Drug

Availability Act

of 1996.

21 USC 301 note.

Oct. 9, 1996

[H.R. 2508]
110 STAT. 3152 PUBLIC LAW 104–250—OCT. 9, 1996

(2) Section 512(c)(2)(F)(v) (21 U.S.C. 360b(c)(2)(F)(v)) is

amended—

(A) by striking ‘‘subparagraph (B)(iv)’’ each place it

appears and inserting ‘‘clause (iv)’’;

(B) by striking ‘‘reports of clinical or field investigations’’ and inserting ‘‘substantial evidence of the

effectiveness of the drug involved, any studies of animal

safety,’’; and

(C) by striking ‘‘essential to’’ and inserting ‘‘required

for’’.

(c) COMBINATION DRUGS.—Section 512(d) (21 U.S.C. 360b(d)),

as amended by subsection (a) is amended by adding at the end

the following:

‘‘(4) In a case in which an animal drug contains more than

one active ingredient, or the labeling of the drug prescribes, recommends, or suggests use of the drug in combination with one

or more other animal drugs, and the active ingredients or drugs

intended for use in the combination have previously been separately

approved for particular uses and conditions of use for which they

are intended for use in the combination—

‘‘(A) the Secretary shall not issue an order under paragraph

(1)(A), (1)(B), or (1)(D) refusing to approve the application for

such combination on human food safety grounds unless the

Secretary finds that the application fails to establish that—

‘‘(i) none of the active ingredients or drugs intended

for use in the combination, respectively, at the longest

withdrawal time of any of the active ingredients or drugs

in the combination, respectively, exceeds its established

tolerance; or

‘‘(ii) none of the active ingredients or drugs in the

combination interferes with the methods of analysis for

another of the active ingredients or drugs in the combination, respectively;

‘‘(B) the Secretary shall not issue an order under paragraph

(1)(A), (1)(B), or (1)(D) refusing to approve the application for

such combination on target animal safety grounds unless the

Secretary finds that—

‘‘(i)(I) there is a substantiated scientific issue, specific

to one or more of the active ingredients or animal drugs

in the combination, that cannot adequately be evaluated

based on information contained in the application for the

combination (including any investigations, studies, or tests

for which the applicant has a right of reference or use

from the person by or for whom the investigations, studies,

or tests were conducted); or

‘‘(II) there is a scientific issue raised by target animal

observations contained in studies submitted to the

Secretary as part of the application; and

‘‘(ii) based on the Secretary’s evaluation of the information contained in the application with respect to the issues

identified in clauses (i) (I) and (II), paragraph (1) (A),

(B), or (D) apply;

‘‘(C) except in the case of a combination that contains

a nontopical antibacterial ingredient or animal drug, the

Secretary shall not issue an order under paragraph (1)(E) refusing to approve an application for a combination animal drug

intended for use other than in animal feed or drinking water
PUBLIC LAW 104–250—OCT. 9, 1996 110 STAT. 3153

unless the Secretary finds that the application fails to demonstrate that—

‘‘(i) there is substantial evidence that any active

ingredient or animal drug intended only for the same use

as another active ingredient or animal drug in the combination makes a contribution to labeled effectiveness;

‘‘(ii) each active ingredient or animal drug intended

for at least one use that is different from all other active

ingredients or animal drugs used in the combination

provides appropriate concurrent use for the intended target

population; or

‘‘(iii) where based on scientific information the

Secretary has reason to believe the active ingredients or

animal drugs may be physically incompatible or have

disparate dosing regimens, such active ingredients or

animal drugs are physically compatible or do not have

disparate dosing regimens; and

‘‘(D) the Secretary shall not issue an order under paragraph

(1)(E) refusing to approve an application for a combination

animal drug intended for use in animal feed or drinking water

unless the Secretary finds that the application fails to demonstrate that—

‘‘(i) there is substantial evidence that any active

ingredient or animal drug intended only for the same use

as another active ingredient or animal drug in the combination makes a contribution to the labeled effectiveness;

‘‘(ii) each of the active ingredients or animal drugs

intended for at least one use that is different from all

other active ingredients or animal drugs used in the combination provides appropriate concurrent use for the

intended target population;

‘‘(iii) where a combination contains more than one nontopical antibacterial ingredient or animal drug, there is

substantial evidence that each of the nontopical antibacterial ingredients or animal drugs makes a contribution

to the labeled effectiveness; or

‘‘(iv) where based on scientific information the

Secretary has reason to believe the active ingredients or

animal drugs intended for use in drinking water may be

physically incompatible, such active ingredients or animal

drugs intended for use in drinking water are physically

compatible.’’.

(d) PRESUBMISSION CONFERENCE.—Section 512(b) (21 U.S.C.

360b(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(3) Any person intending to file an application under paragraph

(1) or a request for an investigational exemption under subsection

(j) shall be entitled to one or more conferences prior to such submission to reach an agreement acceptable to the Secretary establishing

a submission or an investigational requirement, which may include

a requirement for a field investigation. A decision establishing

a submission or an investigational requirement shall bind the Secretary and the applicant or requestor unless (A) the Secretary

and the applicant or requestor mutually agree to modify the requirement, or (B) the Secretary by written order determines that a

substantiated scientific requirement essential to the determination

of safety or effectiveness of the animal drug involved has appeared

after the conference. No later than 25 calendar days after each
110 STAT. 3154 PUBLIC LAW 104–250—OCT. 9, 1996

such conference, the Secretary shall provide a written order setting

forth a scientific justification specific to the animal drug and

intended uses under consideration if the agreement referred to

in the first sentence requires more than one field investigation

as being essential to provide substantial evidence of effectiveness

for the intended uses of the drug. Nothing in this paragraph shall

be construed as compelling the Secretary to require a field investigation.’’.

(e) IMPLEMENTATION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the date

of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human

Services shall issue proposed regulations implementing the

amendments made by this Act as described in paragraph (2)(A)

of this subsection, and not later than 18 months after the

date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue final

regulations implementing such amendments. Not later than

12 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

shall issue proposed regulations implementing the other amendments made by this Act as described in paragraphs (2)(B)

and (2)(C) of this subsection, and not later than 24 months

after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall

issue final regulations implementing such amendments.

(2) CONTENTS.—In issuing regulations implementing the

amendments made by this Act, and in taking an action to

review an application for approval of a new animal drug under

section 512 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21

U.S.C. 360b), or a request for an investigational exemption

for a new animal drug under subsection (j) of such section,

that is pending or has been submitted prior to the effective

date of the regulations, the Secretary shall—

(A) further define the term ‘‘adequate and well

controlled’’, as used in subsection (d)(3) of section 512 of

such Act, to require that field investigations be designed

and conducted in a scientifically sound manner, taking

into account practical conditions in the field and differences

between field conditions and laboratory conditions;

(B) further define the term ‘‘substantial evidence’’, as

defined in subsection (d)(3) of such section, in a manner

that encourages the submission of applications and supplemental applications; and

(C) take into account the proposals contained in the

citizen petition (FDA Docket No. 91P–0434/CP) jointly

submitted by the American Veterinary Medical Association

and the Animal Health Institute, dated October 21, 1991.

Until the regulations required by subparagraph (A) are issued,

nothing in the regulations published at 21 C.F.R. 514.111(a)(5)

(April 1, 1996) shall be construed to compel the Secretary

of Health and Human Services to require a field investigation

under section 512(d)(1)(E) of the Federal Food, Drug, and

Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(d)(1)(E)) or to apply any of its

provisions in a manner inconsistent with the considerations

for scientifically sound field investigations set forth in subparagraph (A).

(f) MINOR SPECIES AND USES.—The Secretary of Health and

Human Services shall consider legislative and regulatory options

for facilitating the approval under section 512 of the Federal Food,

Drug, and Cosmetic Act of animal drugs intended for minor species

21 USC 360b

note.

Regulations.

Effective date.

21 USC 360b

note.
PUBLIC LAW 104–250—OCT. 9, 1996 110 STAT. 3155

and for minor uses and, within 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, announce proposals for legislative or regulatory

change to the approval process under such section for animal drugs

intended for use in minor species or for minor uses.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON RESIDUES.

Section 512(d)(1)(F) (21 U.S.C. 360b(d)(1)(F)) is amended to

read as follows:

‘‘(F) upon the basis of information submitted to the Secretary as part of the application or any other information

before the Secretary with respect to such drug, any use prescribed, recommended, or suggested in labeling proposed for

such drug will result in a residue of such drug in excess

of a tolerance found by the Secretary to be safe for such drug;’’.

SEC. 4. IMPORT TOLERANCES.

Section 512(a) (21 U.S.C. 360b(a)) is amended by adding the

following new paragraph at the end:

‘‘(6) For purposes of section 402(a)(2)(D), a use or intended

use of a new animal drug shall not be deemed unsafe under this

section if the Secretary establishes a tolerance for such drug and

any edible portion of any animal imported into the United States

does not contain residues exceeding such tolerance. In establishing

such tolerance, the Secretary shall rely on data sufficient to

demonstrate that a proposed tolerance is safe based on similar

food safety criteria used by the Secretary to establish tolerances

for applications for new animal drugs filed under subsection (b)(1).

The Secretary may consider and rely on data submitted by the

drug manufacturer, including data submitted to appropriate regulatory authorities in any country where the new animal drug is

lawfully used or data available from a relevant international

organization, to the extent such data are not inconsistent with

the criteria used by the Secretary to establish a tolerance for

applications for new animal drugs filed under subsection (b)(1).

For purposes of this paragraph, ‘relevant international organization’

means the Codex Alimenterius Commission or other international

organization deemed appropriate by the Secretary. The Secretary

may, under procedures specified by regulation, revoke a tolerance

established under this paragraph if information demonstrates that

the use of the new animal drug under actual use conditions results

in food being imported into the United States with residues exceeding the tolerance or if scientific evidence shows the tolerance to

be unsafe.’’.

SEC. 5. VETERINARY FEED DIRECTIVES.

(a) SECTION 503.—Section 503(f)(1)(A) (21 U.S.C. 353(f)(1)(A))

is amended by inserting after ‘‘other than man’’ the following:

‘‘, other than a veterinary feed directive drug intended for use

in animal feed or an animal feed bearing or containing a veterinary

feed directive drug,’’.

(b) SECTION 504.—The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

is amended by inserting after section 503 the following:

‘‘VETERINARY FEED DIRECTIVE DRUGS

‘‘SEC. 504. (a)(1) A drug intended for use in or on animal

feed which is limited by an approved application filed pursuant

to section 512(b) to use under the professional supervision of a

21 USC 354.
110 STAT. 3156 PUBLIC LAW 104–250—OCT. 9, 1996

licensed veterinarian is a veterinary feed directive drug. Any animal

feed bearing or containing a veterinary feed directive drug shall

be fed to animals only by or upon a lawful veterinary feed directive

issued by a licensed veterinarian in the course of the veterinarian’s

professional practice. When labeled, distributed, held, and used

in accordance with this section, a veterinary feed directive drug

and any animal feed bearing or containing a veterinary feed directive drug shall be exempt from section 502(f).

‘‘(2) A veterinary feed directive is lawful if it—

‘‘(A) contains such information as the Secretary may by

general regulation or by order require; and

‘‘(B) is in compliance with the conditions and indications

for use of the drug set forth in the notice published pursuant

to section 512(i).

‘‘(3)(A) Any persons involved in the distribution or use of animal

feed bearing or containing a veterinary feed directive drug and

the licensed veterinarian issuing the veterinary feed directive shall

maintain a copy of the veterinary feed directive applicable to each

such feed, except in the case of a person distributing such feed

to another person for further distribution. Such person distributing

the feed shall maintain a written acknowledgment from the person

to whom the feed is shipped stating that that person shall not

ship or move such feed to an animal production facility without

a veterinary feed directive or ship such feed to another person

for further distribution unless that person has provided the same

written acknowledgment to its immediate supplier.

‘‘(B) Every person required under subparagraph (A) to maintain

records, and every person in charge or custody thereof, shall, upon

request of an officer or employee designated by the Secretary,

permit such officer or employee at all reasonable times to have

access to and copy and verify such records.

‘‘(C) Any person who distributes animal feed bearing or containing a veterinary feed directive drug shall upon first engaging in

such distribution notify the Secretary of that person’s name and

place of business. The failure to provide such notification shall

be deemed to be an act which results in the drug being misbranded.

‘‘(b) A veterinary feed directive drug and any feed bearing

or containing a veterinary feed directive drug shall be deemed

to be misbranded if their labeling fails to bear such cautionary

statement and such other information as the Secretary may by

general regulation or by order prescribe, or their advertising fails

to conform to the conditions and indications for use published

pursuant to section 512(i) or fails to contain the general cautionary

statement prescribed by the Secretary.

‘‘(c) Neither a drug subject to this section, nor animal feed

bearing or containing such a drug, shall be deemed to be a prescription article under any Federal or State law.’’.

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 512 (21 U.S.C. 360b)

is amended in subsection (i) by inserting after ‘‘(including special

labeling requirements’’ the following: ‘‘and any requirement that

an animal feed bearing or containing the new animal drug be

limited to use under the professional supervision of a licensed

veterinarian’’.

(d) SECTION 301(e).—Section 301(e) (21 U.S.C. 331(e)) is

amended by inserting after ‘‘by section 412’’ the following: ‘‘, 504,’’;

and by inserting after ‘‘under section 412,’’ the following: ‘‘504,’’.
PUBLIC LAW 104–250—OCT. 9, 1996 110 STAT. 3157

SEC. 6. FEED MILL LICENSES.

(a) SECTION 512(a).—Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 512(a)

(21 U.S.C. 360b(a)) are amended to read as follows:

‘‘(a)(1) A new animal drug shall, with respect to any particular

use or intended use of such drug, be deemed unsafe for the purposes

of section 501(a)(5) and section 402(a)(2)(D) unless —

‘‘(A) there is in effect an approval of an application filed

pursuant to subsection (b) with respect to such use or intended

use of such drug, and

‘‘(B) such drug, its labeling, and such use conform to such

approved application.

A new animal drug shall also be deemed unsafe for such purposes

in the event of removal from the establishment of a manufacturer,

packer, or distributor of such drug for use in the manufacture

of animal feed in any State unless at the time of such removal

such manufacturer, packer, or distributor has an unrevoked written

statement from the consignee of such drug, or notice from the

Secretary, to the effect that, with respect to the use of such drug

in animal feed, such consignee (i) holds a license issued under

subsection (m) and has in its possession current approved labeling

for such drug in animal feed; or (ii) will, if the consignee is not

a user of the drug, ship such drug only to a holder of a license

issued under subsection (m).

‘‘(2) An animal feed bearing or containing a new animal drug

shall, with respect to any particular use or intended use of such

animal feed be deemed unsafe for the purposes of section 501(a)(6)

unless—

‘‘(A) there is in effect an approval of an application filed

pursuant to subsection (b) with respect to such drug, as used

in such animal feed,

‘‘(B) such animal feed is manufactured at a site for which

there is in effect a license issued pursuant to subsection (m)(1)

to manufacture such animal feed, and

‘‘(C) such animal feed and its labeling, distribution, holding,

and use conform to the conditions and indications of use

published pursuant to subsection (i) .’’.

(b) SECTION 512(m).—Section 512(m) (21 U.S.C. 360b(m)) is

amended to read as follows:

‘‘(m)(1) Any person may file with the Secretary an application

for a license to manufacture animal feeds bearing or containing

new animal drugs. Such person shall submit to the Secretary as

part of the application (A) a full statement of the business name

and address of the specific facility at which the manufacturing

is to take place and the facility’s registration number, (B) the

name and signature of the responsible individual or individuals

for that facility, (C) a certification that the animal feeds bearing

or containing new animal drugs are manufactured and labeled

in accordance with the applicable regulations published pursuant

to subsection (i), and (D) a certification that the methods used

in, and the facilities and controls used for, manufacturing, processing, packaging, and holding such animal feeds are in conformity

with current good manufacturing practice as described in section

501(a)(2)(B).

‘‘(2) Within 90 days after the filing of an application pursuant

to paragraph (1), or such additional period as may be agreed upon

by the Secretary and the applicant, the Secretary shall (A) issue

an order approving the application if the Secretary then finds
110 STAT. 3158 PUBLIC LAW 104–250—OCT. 9, 1996

that none of the grounds for denying approval specified in paragraph

(3) applies, or (B) give the applicant notice of an opportunity for

a hearing before the Secretary under paragraph (3) on the question

whether such application is approvable. The procedure governing

such a hearing shall be the procedure set forth in the last two

sentences of subsection (c)(1).

‘‘(3) If the Secretary, after due notice to the applicant in accordance with paragraph (2) and giving the applicant an opportunity

for a hearing in accordance with such paragraph, finds, on the

basis of information submitted to the Secretary as part of the

application, on the basis of a preapproval inspection, or on the

basis of any other information before the Secretary—

‘‘(A) that the application is incomplete, false, or misleading

in any particular;

‘‘(B) that the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, processing, and packing of

such animal feed are inadequate to preserve the identity,

strength, quality, and purity of the new animal drug therein;

or

‘‘(C) that the facility manufactures animal feeds bearing

or containing new animal drugs in a manner that does not

accord with the specifications for manufacture or labels animal

feeds bearing or containing new animal drugs in a manner

that does not accord with the conditions or indications of use

that are published pursuant to subsection (i),

the Secretary shall issue an order refusing to approve the application. If, after such notice and opportunity for hearing, the Secretary

finds that subparagraphs (A) through (C) do not apply, the Secretary

shall issue an order approving the application. An order under

this subsection approving an application for a license to manufacture animal feeds bearing or containing new animal drugs shall

permit a facility to manufacture only those animal feeds bearing

or containing new animal drugs for which there are in effect regulations pursuant to subsection (i) relating to the use of such drugs

in or on such animal feed.

‘‘(4)(A) The Secretary shall, after due notice and opportunity

for hearing to the applicant, revoke a license to manufacture animal

feeds bearing or containing new animal drugs under this subsection

if the Secretary finds—

‘‘(i) that the application for such license contains any untrue

statement of a material fact; or

‘‘(ii) that the applicant has made changes that would cause

the application to contain any untrue statements of material

fact or that would affect the safety or effectiveness of the

animal feeds manufactured at the facility unless the applicant

has supplemented the application by filing with the Secretary

adequate information respecting all such changes and unless

there is in effect an approval of the supplemental application.

If the Secretary (or in the Secretary’s absence the officer acting

as the Secretary) finds that there is an imminent hazard to the

health of humans or of the animals for which such animal feed

is intended, the Secretary may suspend the license immediately,

and give the applicant prompt notice of the action and afford

the applicant the opportunity for an expedited hearing under this

subsection; but the authority conferred by this sentence shall not

be delegated.
PUBLIC LAW 104–250—OCT. 9, 1996 110 STAT. 3159

‘‘(B) The Secretary may also, after due notice and opportunity

for hearing to the applicant, revoke a license to manufacture animal

feed under this subsection if the Secretary finds—

‘‘(i) that the applicant has failed to establish a system

for maintaining required records, or has repeatedly or deliberately failed to maintain such records or to make required

reports in accordance with a regulation or order under paragraph (5)(A) of this subsection or section 504(a)(3)(A), or the

applicant has refused to permit access to, or copying or verification of, such records as required by subparagraph (B) of such

paragraph or section 504(a)(3)(B);

‘‘(ii) that on the basis of new information before the

Secretary, evaluated together with the evidence before the Secretary when such license was issued, the methods used in,

or the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, processing, packing, and holding of such animal feed are inadequate

to assure and preserve the identity, strength, quality, and

purity of the new animal drug therein, and were not made

adequate within a reasonable time after receipt of written

notice from the Secretary, specifying the matter complained

of;

‘‘(iii) that on the basis of new information before the

Secretary, evaluated together with the evidence before the Secretary when such license was issued, the labeling of any animal

feeds, based on a fair evaluation of all material facts, is false

or misleading in any particular and was not corrected within

a reasonable time after receipt of written notice from the Secretary specifying the matter complained of; or

‘‘(iv) that on the basis of new information before the

Secretary, evaluated together with the evidence before the Secretary when such license was issued, the facility has manufactured, processed, packed, or held animal feed bearing or

containing a new animal drug adulterated under section

501(a)(6) and the facility did not discontinue the manufacture,

processing, packing, or holding of such animal feed within

a reasonable time after receipt of written notice from the

Secretary specifying the matter complained of.

‘‘(C) The Secretary may also revoke a license to manufacture

animal feeds under this subsection if an applicant gives notice

to the Secretary of intention to discontinue the manufacture of

all animal feed covered under this subsection and waives an opportunity for a hearing on the matter.

‘‘(D) Any order under this paragraph shall state the findings

upon which it is based.

‘‘(5) When a license to manufacture animal feeds bearing or

containing new animal drugs has been issued—

‘‘(A) the applicant shall establish and maintain such

records, and make such reports to the Secretary, or (at the

option of the Secretary) to the appropriate person or persons

holding an approved application filed under subsection (b), as

the Secretary may by general regulation, or by order with

respect to such application, prescribe on the basis of a finding

that such records and reports are necessary in order to enable

the Secretary to determine, or facilitate a determination,

whether there is or may be ground for invoking subsection

(e) or paragraph (4); and
110 STAT. 3160 PUBLIC LAW 104–250—OCT. 9, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2508 (S. 773):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–823 (Comm. on Commerce).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Sept. 24, considered and passed House. S. 773 considered and passed Senate.

Sept. 25, H.R. 2508 considered and passed Senate.

Æ

‘‘(B) every person required under this subsection to maintain records, and every person in charge or custody thereof,

shall, upon request of an officer or employee designated by

the Secretary, permit such officer or employee at all reasonable

times to have access to and copy and verify such records.

‘‘(6) To the extent consistent with the public health, the

Secretary may promulgate regulations for exempting from the operation of this subsection facilities that manufacture, process, pack,

or hold animal feeds bearing or containing new animal drugs.’’.

(c) TRANSITIONAL PROVISION.—A person engaged in the manufacture of animal feeds bearing or containing new animal drugs

who holds at least one approved medicated feed application for

an animal feed bearing or containing new animal drugs, the manufacture of which was not otherwise exempt from the requirement

for an approved medicated feed application on the date of the

enactment of this Act, shall be deemed to hold a license for the

manufacturing site identified in the approved medicated feed

application. The revocation of license provisions of section 512(m)(4)

of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by this

Act, shall apply to such licenses. Such license shall expire within

18 months from the date of enactment of this Act unless the

person submits to the Secretary a completed license application

for the manufacturing site accompanied by a copy of an approved

medicated feed application for such site, which license application

shall be deemed to be approved upon receipt by the Secretary.

Approved October 9, 1996.

21 USC 360b

note.