alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   10-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                            6735
<SECURITIES>                                     51215
<RECEIVABLES>                                    11973
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                       8428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 78871
<PP&E>                                           70955
<DEPRECIATION>                                   53455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  132397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11942
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                       82332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    132397
<SALES>                                          24489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 24489
<CGS>                                            18073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    24972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1773
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (647)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2420
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



              In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thomas  Industries Inc.
         (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as
         filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
         (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief
         Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
         Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
         Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge (1) the Report fully complies
         with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly represents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
         and  results of  operations  of the  Company as of and for the  periods
         covered in the Report.



         /s/ Timothy C. Brown
         ----------------------------------------
         Timothy C. Brown, Chief Executive Officer


         /s/ Phillip J. Stuecker
         ----------------------------------------
         Phillip J. Stuecker, Chief Financial Officer



         May 10, 2004



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Thomas Industries Inc. and will be
retained by Thomas  Industries Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be  considered  filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.


                                       22
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Sharkey, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.


/s/ John G. Sharkey
---------------------------
Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
April 5, 2005
No. 41928.

#### Protest 435774-G of American Express Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of laces similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(d) Certification

 

I, In-Young Chase, certify that:

 

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reportson Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of SATURNS Trust No.2010-04 (IP) (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. 	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the ExchangeAct periodic reports;

 

4. 	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s)required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer,The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of SATURNS Trust No. 2010-04 (IP), has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement,which is the Trust Agreement relating to SATURNS Trust No. 2010-04 (IP); and

 

5. 	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report. Any material instances of noncompliance describedin such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and its officers and agents.

 

 

 

By:	/s/In-YoungChase	

Name:	In-YoungChase
PUBLIC LAW 104–199—SEPT. 21, 1996 110 STAT. 2419

Public Law 104–199

104th Congress

An Act

To define and protect the institution of marriage.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense of Marriage Act’’.

SEC. 2. POWERS RESERVED TO THE STATES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code,

is amended by adding after section 1738B the following:

‘‘§ 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the

effect thereof

‘‘No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or

Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act,

record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the

same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such

other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim

arising from such relationship.’’.

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is amended

by inserting after the item relating to section 1738B the following

new item:

‘‘1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof.’’.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code,

is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘§ 7. Definition of ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’

‘‘In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of

any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’

means only a legal union between one man and one woman as

husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person

of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.’’.

1 USC 1 note.

Defense of

Marriage Act.

Sept. 21, 1996

[H.R. 3396]
110 STAT. 2420 PUBLIC LAW 104–199—SEPT. 21, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3396:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–664 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

July 11, 12, considered and passed House.

Sept. 10, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by

inserting after the item relating to section 6 the following new

item:

‘‘7. Definition of ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’.’’.

Approved September 21, 1996.
# C_2008127EN.01000302.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4927 — Carlyle/INEOS/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 127/06)

On 20 December 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4927. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4927. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
No. 39000.

#### Protest 630913-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of palm fiber or palmyra stalks the same as those passed upon in *American Push Broom & Brush Co.*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 248, T. D. 49391). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1684 was therefore sustained.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**NORTHAM ACQUISITION CORP.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofNortham Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Tay, Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company,certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to William Tay and will be retained by Northam Acquisition Corp. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Dated: February 18, 2014

 

By: /s/ William Tay

William Tay

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 64303.

protests 59/12193, etc. (New York).

#### James M. McCunn & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it ivas held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 2 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 3 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 4 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 5 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 6 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 7 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 8 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 9 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 10 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 11 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 12 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-00498-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 150 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 13 of 13 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 53107.

#### The Columbia Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 848581-G, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity Capital Corporation, a New Mexico corporation (“Trinity”), for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William C. Enloe, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Trinity, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Trinity. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ William C. Enloe                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| William C. Enloe                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| November 9, 2009                      |
**
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form N-2 of SLR Senior Investment Corp.of our report dated March 1, 2022, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of SLR Senior Investment Corp. for the year endedDecember 31, 2021, and to the use of our report dated March 1, 2022 on the senior securities table included herein as an exhibit to the Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to our firmunder the heading “Controls and Procedures” in the Form 10-K.

/s/ KPMG LLP 

New York, New York 

March 1, 2022 
**
----

Action brought on 19 May 2005 by Nalocebar — Consultores e Serviços Lda. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-210/05)

(2005/C 182/79)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 19 May 2005 by Nalocebar — Consultores e Serviços Lda., established in Funchal (Madeira), represented by G. Pasquarella and R. M. Pasquarella, lawyers.

Limiñana y Botella, S. L. established in Monforte del Cid, Alicante (Spain) was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

----

(1)OJ L 011, 14/01/1994, p. 1

----
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00273-CV

Tracy James JEWELL,

Appellant

v.

Melonie Rose JEWELL,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. FL-11-007

Honorable Thomas F. Lee, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 5, 2011

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Tracey James Jewell appealed the trial court’s judgment rendered on April 22, 2011. 

Jewell’s brief was due on August 12, 2011. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time 

was filed. On August 31, 2011, we ordered Appellant to file, not later than September 12, 2011, 

his appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the 

brief. We advised Appellant that if he failed to file a brief and the written response by the date 

ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see 
04-11-00273-CV

- 2 -

also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (court may dismiss appeal because appellant has failed to comply 

with a court order within the time provided). Appellant has not filed a brief or the written 

response ordered by the court.

We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order that 

appellee, Melonie Rose Jewell, recover her costs in this appeal from Tracy James Jewell.

PER CURIAM
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-11070

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WEBSTER TERRELL JOHNSON, also known as Webster Terell Johnson,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CR-126-1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Webster Terrell Johnson has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Johnson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 12, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-11070 Document: 00515413441 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2020
No. 19-11070

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-11070 Document: 00515413441 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2020
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of TransTechnology Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: November 15, 2004                 /s/ Robert L. G. White
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert L.G. White,
                                        President & Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 15, 2004                 /s/ Joseph F. Spanier
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joseph F. Spanier,
                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                       33