alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

December 17, 1948

No. 52754.

protests 65528-K, etc. (New York).

#### Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the *262holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 62012.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 217328-K, etc. (El Paso).

*582Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 c. C. P. A. 20, G. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of the Secretory of Tronsportonon 

Chief, Documentary Services Div. 

Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR 

SERVICE OF NOTICE, PROCESS, ORDERS 

DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 

ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION, C-55 

Blue Panorama Airlines S,p,A. 

(Name of Company, please print) 

, having its principal 

officem ___________ V~1~·a~le~d~e~ll~e~Art~~i,~1~2~3~,~000~5~4~F~l='u=m~i~Cl~'n~o~,R~o~m~e~,~fi~al~y ________________________ _ 

(Address) 

hereby designates, pursuant to section 46103 of title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly section 1005(b) of the Federal Aviation Act of 

1958, as amended) the person named below as its Agent upon whom service of all notices and process, and all orders, decisions, 

and requirements of the Department of Transportation may be made for and on behalf of said carrier, hereby canceling all previous 

designations of agents made by it to the DOT. 

Name of Agent ___ """"'D:..>a""v'""id ....... M~. ~H""e""'m,...a,.,n..,d'"'e".z'--__________________ _ (please Print) 

Address Vedder Price P,C., 1401 1St. NW, Suite 1100, Washington DC 20005 

Office: (202) 312-3320, Fax: (202) 312-3322, Email: dhemandez@vedderprice.com 

Th, Ago", w d .. lg"'ted h" W'i 0 h" :t ,wl .:;;" iniO>1, 10 th' fol1owl g .",re, 11~ 

Name ~ /1'1' (Initials) --.... u.tilt!L- l-<--+-----

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, _____ .... B~l""u""e .... P-"a..,n""o""'ra".m...",a_'_A.o.:ir""'lin""· ..,e<!<sc..:S"".""p.!.:..A-,",~ ______ has caused these 

(Name of Company) 

presents to be signed in its name by ___________ -"'-F...,ra"'n~c""o'-'P .... e""c""c""i _________ ____', President 

(Please Print) 

of said company, and to be attested under its corporate seal by 

(Secretary, or other Title) 

on this ~ day of 0u tJ2; ,2011. 

.A. 

By: __ ~======~~~~====~~ ______ __ 

OST F ) 010.5 (1-95)
Assignment and Assumption of Agreement of Purchase and Sale



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE 
 THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION (this
“Assignment”) is dated May 22, 2008, by and between FOWLER PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Assignor”) and FPA CONIFER ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability (“Assignee”)
with reference to the following: 
 WHEREAS, Assignor entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement for certain real property located at 3383
Holcomb Bridge Road, Norcross, Georgia (“Subject Property”) on or about April 2, 2008, as further amended from time to time, with Simpson Financing LP (“Seller”) (the “Purchase Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign all of its right, title, interest and obligations in the Purchase Agreement to the Assignee. 
 WHEREAS, Assignee is willing to accept said assignment of the Purchase Agreement. 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of its right, title, interest and obligations under the Purchase Agreement. 
 2.
Effective upon Assignor’s assignment pursuant to Paragraph I, Assignee accepts said assignment and expressly assumes the Assignor’s rights and obligations pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and all amendments thereto, including, but not
limited to, Assignor’s liability with respect to the representations, warranties, indemnities and covenants contained therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Assignor shall not be released from the obligations in the Purchase Agreement and
shall remain liable therefore. 
 3. Assignee shall indemnify, defend and hold Assignor harmless from and against any and all liabilities,
losses, claims, damages, costs or expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, arising out of Assignor’s obligations under the Purchase Agreement 
 4. Assignor represents and warrants to Assignee that, as of the effective date of this Assignment, (i) Assignor has not previously assigned or
encumbered its rights under the Purchase Agreement, (ii) Assignor has not cancelled or terminated the Purchase Agreement, (iii) no notice of default has been received from the seller under the Purchase Agreement, and (iv) to
Assignor’s knowledge, Assignor is not in default under the Purchase Agreement. 
 5. This Assignment consists of two pages and may be
signed in one or more counterparts and all such counterparts shall be treated as one agreement. Facsimile copies of signature pages of this Assignment shall be deemed originals for purposes of the creation of a fully executed, delivered and
enforceable counterpart contract. 








			
	“ASSIGNOR”:
	
	Fowler Property Acquisitions, LLC
	a California limited liability company
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    Michael B. Earl        

		 	Michael B. Earl, Manager-Member
	
	“ASSIGNEE”
	FPA CONIFER ASSOCIATES, LLC
	a Delaware limited liability company
	By it Manager:
	GF CONIFER, LLC
	A Delaware limited liability company
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    Michael B. Earl        

		 	Michael B. Earl, Manager
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-cr-193

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

FAUSTINO RINCON-ALFARO, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On July 9, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Count 1 of the

Indictment, charging him with conspiracy to distribute and to possess with the intent to distribute

5 kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(ii), and 846. 

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00193-GCS-NMK Doc #: 36 Filed: 08/04/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

conspiracy to distribute and to possess with the intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00193-GCS-NMK Doc #: 36 Filed: 08/04/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Misty Clark,

Plaintiff

 v.

Ryan Britton,

Defendant

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00980

Judge Sargus

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

Defendant Ryan Britton’s April 17, 2013 unopposed motion to stay the dispositive motion deadline (doc. 27) is DENIED.

Plaintiff Misty Clark’s March 11, 2013 motion to compel (doc. 16) is GRANTED

in part. Defendant is ORDERED to provide plaintiff’s counsel of the names of the two

inmate witnesses. Defendant’s reliance on ODRC Policy 07-ORD-03 is misplaced. The

policy concerns the recording, maintenance and management of an inmate’s Record

Office File, which contains copies of official court documents and other confidential

information pertaining to an inmate’s institutional adjustment. Clark does not seek

access to the inmates’ Record Office Files. 

Prison investigators had reason to believe these two inmates had information

relevant to plaintiff's allegations against Britton. Although the investigator's notes

about their statements suggest that one inmate had no information relevant to the

investigation and the other only some, I cannot say that talking with them may not lead

Case: 2:11-cv-00980-EAS-EPD Doc #: 28 Filed: 04/19/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
to discoverable, relevant information. To address defendant’s security concerns, the

disclosures of the names will be limited at this time to plaintiff’s counsel’s eyes only. If

these inmates have information plaintiff’s counsel believes supports their client’s claims

or undermines defendant’s defenses, they may file a motion, supported by good cause,

to permit them to disclose the inmate’s names to Ms. Clark.

The motion to compel is DENIED with respect to Britton’s order of deployment.

From defendant’s reply brief it appears that plaintiff now has all the information about

the deployment to which she is entitled.

Under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), Rule 72(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., and

Eastern Division Order No. 91-3, pt. F, 5, either party may, within fourteen (14) days

after this Order is filed, file and serve on the opposing party a motion for

reconsideration by the District Judge. The motion must specifically designate the

Order, or part thereof, in question and the basis for any objection thereto. The District

Judge, upon consideration of the motion, shall set aside any part of this Order found to

be clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00980-EAS-EPD Doc #: 28 Filed: 04/19/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES, AND TRUST CORPUS AS OF JUN-30-1999 AND THE
STATEMENT OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUN-30-1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,358,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,358,985
<PP&E>                                      28,267,655
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,830,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,796,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     437,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,796,128
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,958
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               119,365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,593
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,593
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .012
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .012


</TABLE>
## ** **

## **Exhibit32.1**

**Certification of Chief ExecutiveOfficer**

**of Tipperary Corporation  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

 

 

                In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tipperary Corporation (the “*Company*”) for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “*Report*”), I, David L. Bradshaw, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

                                                1.             theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

                                                2.             the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
|   |   |   |         | /s/ David L. Bradshaw   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   | Name:   | David L. Bradshaw       |
|   |   |   | Title:  | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   | Date:   | May 16, 2005            |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2016

No. 04-14-00389-CR

Paul Anthony GARCIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5397

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On August 24, 2016, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted the State’s petition for 

discretionary review and remanded the matter back to this court “for consideration of the State’s 

argument” regarding the existence of exigent circumstances. State v. Garcia, Nos. PD-118-15 & 

PD-119-15, 2016 WL 4491521, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 24, 2016) (not designated for 

publication). The court’s mandate issued September 19, 2016. 

Accordingly, the parties may file supplemental briefs on the issue of exigency, and such 

briefs are encouraged by this court. Any supplemental briefs must contain argument as directed 

by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, i.e., whether there is evidence of exigency excusing the 

failure to obtain a warrant. We ORDER the State to file its supplemental brief, if any, in this 

court on or before October 27, 2016. Appellant’s supplemental brief will be due in this court 

thirty (30) days after the date the State’s supplemental brief is filed in this court. If either party 

chooses not to file supplemental brief, that party is ORDERED to notify this court of such fact 

in writing on or before October 7, 2016. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of September, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
III 

Calendar No. 386 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 28 

[Report No. 109–227] 

Approving the location of the commemorative work in the District of Columbia 

honoring former President Dwight D. Eisenhower. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2006 

Mr. STEVENS (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. REED, Mr. 

BROWNBACK, Mr. SPECTER, and Mr. BENNETT) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources 

APRIL 3, 2006 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the location of the commemorative work in the 

District of Columbia honoring former President Dwight 

D. Eisenhower. 

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code 

provides that the location of a commemorative work in 

the area described as Area I shall be deemed authorized 

only if approved by law not later than 150 days after notification to Congress and others that the commemorative 

work may be located in Area I; 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SJ 28 RS 

Whereas section 8162 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2000 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note) authorizes the 

Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission to establish 

a memorial on Federal land in the District of Columbia 

to honor Dwight D. Eisenhower; and 

Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress 

of her determination that the memorial should be located 

in Area I: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the location of the commemorative work to honor 

4 Dwight D. Eisenhower, authorized by section 8162 of the 

5 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2000 (40 

6 U.S.C. 8903 note), within Area I as depicted on the map 

7 referred to in section 8908(a) of title 40, United States 

8 Code, is approved. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS

hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Calendar No. 386 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 28 

[Report No. 109

–227] 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the location of the commemorative work 

President Dwight D. Eisenhower. in the District of Columbia honoring former 

APRIL 3, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Exhibit
15.1







April 29, 2016



Sky-mobi Limited

10/F, Building B, United Mansion

No. 2 Zijinghua Road, Hangzhou

Zhejiang 310013

People’s Republic of China



Dear Sir/Madam:



We
hereby consent to the reference of our name and inclusion of the summary and quotation of our opinion under the headings “Item
3.D. Key Information—Risk Factors” and “Item 4.A. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulations”
in Sky-mobi Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Report”),
which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in the month of April 2016. We also
consent to the filing with the SEC of this consent letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report.



In giving such consent, we do not thereby
admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, or under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in each case, as amended, or the regulations promulgated thereunder.



Yours faithfully,



/s/DaHui Lawyers

DaHui Lawyers
# C_2008297EN.01S00301.xml

| 20.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 20 November 2008, in Official Journal of the European Union C 297 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 27th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see: http://publications.europa.eu/others/sales_agents_en.html).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9302 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9302

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require secret ballots and 
       employee participation in the election of representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2024

 Mr. Walberg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require secret ballots and 
       employee participation in the election of representatives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Worker Enfranchisement Act''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYEE ENFRANCHISEMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 
U.S.C. 159) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``That no person shall 
        be an exclusive representative of employees in such unit unless 
        such person has been designated or selected as the exclusive 
        representative of such employees by a majority of the voters in 
        a secret ballot election in which not less than two-thirds of 
        such employees vote; Provided further,'' after ``employment: 
        Provided,''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(3), by inserting ``of the at least 
        two-thirds of employees eligible to vote'' after ``majority''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply in 
relation to elections occurring on or after the date that is 6 months 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```