Appendix A 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Program 

Scoping Report

in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Scoping Report 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

Program 

November 20, 2013 

Prepared by CH2M HILL 

TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 iii in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Contents 

Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................... vii

Summary ................................................................................................................................ S-1

1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Background ..................................................................................................... 1-2

1.3 Description of Program ................................................................................... 1-4

1.4 Purpose of Public Scoping .............................................................................. 1-7

1.5 Notification of EIS Scoping ............................................................................ 1-8

1.5.1 Print Media ............................................................................................... 1-8 

1.5.2 Electronic Notification .............................................................................. 1-9 

1.5.3 Media Coverage ...................................................................................... 1-11 

1.6 Scoping Process ............................................................................................ 1-13

1.6.1 In-Person Open Houses ........................................................................... 1-13 

1.6.2 Online Scoping Open House ................................................................... 1-14 

2.0 Public and Agency Involvement During Scoping .................................................. 2-1

2.1 Summary of Public Scoping Meetings ........................................................... 2-3

2.1.1 Oklahoma City, OK – March 25, 2013 ..................................................... 2-3 

2.1.2 Waco, TX – March 25, 2013 .................................................................... 2-4 

2.1.3 Ardmore, OK – March 26, 2013 ............................................................... 2-4 

2.1.4 Austin, TX – March 27, 2013 ................................................................... 2-5 

2.1.5 Fort Worth, TX – March 28, 2013 ............................................................ 2-6 

2.1.6 Belton, TX – April 1, 2013 ....................................................................... 2-6 

2.1.7 San Antonio, TX – April 1, 2013 .............................................................. 2-7 

2.1.8 Sherman, TX – April 1, 2013 .................................................................... 2-7 

2.1.9 Corpus Christi, TX – April 2, 2013 .......................................................... 2-7 

2.1.10 Dallas, TX – April 3, 2013 ........................................................................ 2-8 

2.1.11 Laredo, TX – April 3, 2013 ...................................................................... 2-8 

2.1.12 Harlingen, TX – April 4, 2013 .................................................................. 2-9 

2.2 Agency Scoping Meetings .............................................................................. 2-9

2.3 Summary of Other Related Outreach Activities ............................................. 2-9

2.3.1 Stakeholder Workshops ............................................................................ 2-9 

2.3.2 Environmental Interest Group Meeting .................................................. 2-10 

2.3.3 Tribal Coordination ................................................................................. 2-10 

3.0 Scoping Summary of Issues ...................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Scoping Summary of Potential Alignments and Stations ............................... 3-2

3.1.1 Support and Opposition ............................................................................ 3-2 

3.1.2 Cost, Affordability, and Funding .............................................................. 3-3 

3.1.3 Services and Amenities on Trains ............................................................. 3-4 

3.1.4 Services and Amenities at Stations ........................................................... 3-4 

3.1.5 Station Locations ...................................................................................... 3-4 

3.1.6 Alternatives/Routes ................................................................................... 3-5 

3.2 Environmental Concerns ................................................................................. 3-5

3.2.1 Agriculture ................................................................................................ 3-5 
SCOPING REPORT 

 iv in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

3.2.2 Air Quality ................................................................................................ 3-6 

3.2.3 Energy ....................................................................................................... 3-6 

3.2.4 Growth ...................................................................................................... 3-6 

3.2.5 Health ........................................................................................................ 3-6 

3.2.6 Local and Regional Economy ................................................................... 3-7 

3.2.7 Natural Environment ................................................................................. 3-7 

3.2.8 Noise ......................................................................................................... 3-8 

3.2.9 Right-of-Way ............................................................................................ 3-8 

3.3 Technical/Engineering Concerns .................................................................... 3-8

3.3.1 Ridership ................................................................................................... 3-8 

3.3.2 Planning .................................................................................................... 3-8 

3.3.3 Freight ....................................................................................................... 3-9 

3.3.4 Safety ........................................................................................................ 3-9 

3.3.5 Technology ............................................................................................... 3-9 

3.4 Elected Officials, Agencies, and Tribal Responses to NOI .......................... 3-10

3.4.1 Elected Officials...................................................................................... 3-10 

3.4.2 Federal .................................................................................................... 3-11 

3.4.3 Tribal Coordination ................................................................................. 3-12 

3.4.4 State ........................................................................................................ 3-12 

3.4.5 Regional .................................................................................................. 3-14 

3.4.6 Organizations .......................................................................................... 3-16 

3.5 Summary Comment Tables ........................................................................... 3-17

4.0 Next steps ................................................................................................................... 4-1

List of Appendices 

A Notice of Intent

B Public Scoping Meeting Announcements – Print Media 

C Public Scoping Meeting Announcements – Electronic Notification 

D Public Scoping Meeting Materials 

E Public Scoping Comments – Agencies and Elected Officials 

F Public Scoping Comments – Tribes 

G Public Scoping Comments – Organizations, Businesses, and Individuals 

H Summary and Tally of Public Scoping Comments 

List of Tables 

1-1 Notification Methods, Timeframe, and Targeted Audience .......................................... 1-10 

2-1 Public Scoping Meetings and Locations within the Program Corridor ........................... 2-1 

3-1a Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies 

(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) ...................................................................... 3-18 

3-1b Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies 

(International Boundary and Water Commission) ......................................................... 3-37 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 v in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

3-1c Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies 

(State Agencies outside Texas) ...................................................................................... 3-38 

3-1d Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies 

(State Agencies within Texas) ....................................................................................... 3-39 

3-1e Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies 

(Metropolitan Planning Organizations) ......................................................................... 3-48 

3-1f Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies 

(Regional and Local Government Agencies) ................................................................. 3-49 

3-2 Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Tribes .......................................................... 3-62 

3-3a Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Organizations and 

Businesses (Organizations) ............................................................................................ 3-63 

3-3b Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Organizations and Businesses 

(Businesses) ................................................................................................................... 3-65 

3-4 Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Individuals .................................................. 3-74 

List of Figures 

1-1 Program Steps and Schedule ............................................................................................ 1-5

1-2 Proposed Program System ............................................................................................... 1-6

TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 vii in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Acronyms and Abbreviations 

ADA Americans with Disabilities Act 

CEQ Council on Environmental Quality 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

DFW Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport 

EIS environmental impact statement 

FRA Federal Railroad Administration 

FRA Environmental Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts 

Procedures 

IH Interstate Highway 

mph miles per hour 

MPO metropolitan planning organization 

MSA metropolitan statistical area 

MSDC Minority Supplier Development Council 

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act 

NOI Notice of Intent 

ODOT Oklahoma Department of Transportation 

OK Oklahoma 

Program Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Program 

ROD Record of Decision 

Study Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study 

TOPRS Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study 

TPWD Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 

TRE Trinity Railway Express 

TSA Transportation Security Administration 

TxDOT Texas Department of Transportation 

USFWS US Fish and Wildlife Service 

TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 S-1 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Summary 

The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and the Federal Railroad Administration 

(FRA) are preparing a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS) to evaluate intercity 

passenger rail service alternatives for the Texas-Oklahoma passenger rail program (Program). 

The Program would provide new and/or higher speed intercity passenger rail service along an 

850-mile corridor extending from Oklahoma City, Okla., to south Texas (including the cities of 

Corpus Christi and Laredo and the Rio Grande Valley). The Rio Grande Valley includes the 

cities of McAllen, Harlingen, and Brownsville and surrounding communities along the river. 

While all of these south Texas cities are within the alternative corridors and are being evaluated, 

it is possible that not all of them will ultimately be served by passenger rail. Preparation of this 

service-level EIS is one of two primary objectives of the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study 

(TOPRS or Study). In addition to the service-level EIS, the Study also includes preparation of a 

service development plan for the corridor to guide further development and capital investment in 

passenger rail improvements identified in the EIS Record of Decision (ROD). The Oklahoma 

Department of Transportation (ODOT) is a partnering state agency in the development of the 

Study and the EIS. The service-level EIS will evaluate a reasonable range of corridor alternatives 

and passenger rail service options and will make decisions regarding the preferred corridor, 

location of train service termini, location of intermediate stops, level of service, and future 

planning for projects to implement the Program. Alternatives considered will include a No 

Action (No Build) alternative, as well as multiple build alternatives. The build alternatives may 

include infrastructure improvements in existing or prior rail corridors, the development of one or 

more new rail corridors, or a combination of both, as well as varying levels of service. 

Previous studies have identified three geographic passenger rail market areas that comprise the 

program corridor. Each of these market areas has a distinct level of existing passenger rail 

demand and service, and opportunity for development, while remaining connected to and 

interdependent with the passenger rail network across the overall program corridor. In addition to 

the overall Program corridor, the EIS will evaluate each of the three geographic sections: 

 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth 

 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio 

 Southern Section: San Antonio to south Texas (Laredo, Corpus Christi, and the Rio Grande 

Valley) 

The purpose of this report is to summarize the public scoping process and comments received 

during the public scoping period for the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Program service-level 

EIS. The report provides a brief background of the study, a description of the public scoping 

process and meetings, a list of other outreach activities, and a summary of the public and agency 

comments received during scoping. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 S-2 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

A Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare a service-level EIS for the Program was issued on March 7, 

2013, and published in the Federal Register on March 13, 2013. In the NOI, public agencies with 

legal jurisdiction were requested to advise TxDOT and the FRA of (1) the applicable permit and 

environmental review requirements of each agency and (2) the scope and content of the 

environmental information germane to the agency’s statutory responsibilities in connection with 

the proposed study. Public scoping meetings were announced and held as an important 

component of the public scoping process for the environmental review. 

During the public scoping period, 12 public scoping meetings were held between March 25 and 

April 4, 2013, with a total of approximately 340 people attending. In addition, there were three 

agency meetings during the scoping period, three stakeholder meetings held in February 2013, 

and one environmental interest group meeting held on April 18, 2013. FRA also initiated 

government-to-government contact with federally recognized tribes. TxDOT and FRA received 

approximately 1,200 comments from agencies, organizations, and individuals regarding the 

Program. General issue areas frequently identified as a result of public scoping are listed below: 

 Agriculture – impacts on farmland and productivity/viability of agricultural activities 

 Benefits of passenger rail service, including but not limited to air quality, congestion relief, 

and economic development 

 Connections to local transit and the promotion of mass transit 

 Employment opportunities 

 Energy consumption and technology used for the trains 

 Freight and passenger rail compatibility 

 General support for the study 

 Health 

 Impacts on plant and animal species, including associated habitats 

 Impacts on wildlife corridor movement 

 Integration of the system with existing and planned regional and local transportation/transit 

efforts 

 Location of rail corridor 

 Location of stations 

 Noise impacts 

 Open space 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 S-3 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 Parks and recreation 

 Potential devaluation of property 

 Questions about cost and financing of the system 

 Regional and local economic growth 

 Ridership 

 Right-of-way 

 Safety/hazards 

 Water quality and runoff 

Following the public scoping process, information based on the comments received during 

public scoping will be considered during the selection and evaluation of alternatives in the 

service-level EIS process. 

The analysis of existing conditions and potential impacts of program alternatives will then be 

documented to the draft EIS, which FRA and TxDOT will make available for public comment. 

Publication of the draft EIS is anticipated in 2014. A 45-day comment period will begin 

following publication of the Notice of Availability of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. 

TxDOT will distribute notices of availability to recipients on the study mailing list and to 

potentially affected property owners. In addition, the EIS will be posted on TxDOT’s website 

(http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/projects/studies/statewide/texas-oklahoma-rail.html) and on 

the TOPRS website (www.txokrail.org). Public hearings will be held in the study area to provide 

the public the opportunity to review a summary of the contents of the draft EIS and to provide 

comments. 

After the public comment period and the review of agency and public comments on the draft 

EIS, TxDOT, in conjunction with FRA, will identify preferred routes, potential station locations, 

and service-level alternatives, as well as the frequency of passenger rail service for the corridor 

route alignment within each of the three corridor sections. The final service-level EIS is expected 

to be completed in 2014 with issuance of a ROD in late 2014. Following completion of the 

service-level EIS, project-level assessment(s) will address component projects to be 

implemented within the selected alternative and, where appropriate, will incorporate by 

reference, the data and evaluations included in the service-level EIS. Subsequent evaluations will 

concentrate on the issues specific to the component of the alternative selected in the service-level 

EIS and analyze the specific environmental consequences and measures, if necessary, to mitigate 

environmental impacts at a site-specific level of detail. 

TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-1 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

1.0 Introduction 

The 850-mile Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Program (Program) corridor extends from 

Oklahoma City in the north through Dallas, Fort Worth, Austin, and San Antonio to destinations 

in south Texas, which is the region south of San Antonio, including the cities of Corpus Christi 

and Laredo and the Rio Grande Valley. The Rio Grande Valley includes the cities of McAllen, 

Harlingen, and Brownsville and surrounding communities along the river. Existing passenger rail 

service includes intercity service on the Heartland Flyer (Oklahoma City to Fort Worth), Texas 

Eagle (Chicago to San Antonio via Dallas and Fort Worth), and Sunset Limited (Los Angeles to 

New Orleans via San Antonio) operated by Amtrak, and regional/commuter rail service on the 

Trinity Railway Express (Dallas to Fort Worth) and Capital MetroRail (Austin) operated by 

Texas operators. Intercity passenger rail between Oklahoma City and San Antonio provides 

service to cities and communities generally along the Interstate 35 (IH-35) corridor. 

This scoping report summarizes the public scoping process for the Program. This report includes 

a description of the Study; explains the purpose of public scoping; describes the public scoping 

notification process; summarizes the 12 public scoping meetings, the 3 agency meetings, the 3 

stakeholder meetings, and the environmental interest group meeting; summarizes the comments 

received from the public and agencies; and describes the next steps for the Study. 

1.1 Purpose and Need 

The purpose of the Program is to evaluate options to enhance intercity mobility by providing 

passenger rail service as a competitive transportation alternative in a manner that would 

accomplish the following: 

 Provide the infrastructure for a high-quality intercity rail service that will reduce travel times, 

increase reliability, and increase traveler comfort. 

 Encourage more efficient and environmentally sensitive modes of intercity travel. 

 Provide an equitable and affordable intercity travel alternative to automobile, bus, and air 

service. 

 Provide enhanced interconnectivity between intercity rail services, regional transit services, 

and major regional airports. 

 Enhance environmental sustainability by facilitating regional land use and transit-oriented 

development plans within the Program corridor. 

 Enhance interregional access to employment, entertainment, recreation, health, and shopping 

opportunities for existing and future residents in the Program corridor. 

 Coordinate with and not negatively affect freight rail operations or facilities. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-2 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 Be a cost-efficient investment where the projected train service revenue would be expected to 

exceed its operations and maintenance costs. 

These potential improvements are needed because population and business growth in the study 

area have resulted in growing congestion along the IH-35 corridor and intercity passenger rail 

service is an alternative to meet future demand for travel. 

Texas is the second most populous state in the United States and its population is expected to 

grow by 39 percent from 2010 to 2035, with 92 percent of the population growth between 2010 

and 2030 to occur in metropolitan counties. Oklahoma City is expected to experience a 

population increase of 25 percent from 2000 to 2035, with intensified population densities in the 

metropolitan area. In addition, population forecasts anticipate that the percentage of people who 

are 65 years old or older will grow from about 13 percent to nearly 20 percent by 2030 in 

Oklahoma and from 10 percent to more than 17 percent in Texas. This aging population will rely 

more heavily on public transportation such as intercity rail. Long-range transportation plans in 

Texas and Oklahoma have identified the need to improve passenger rail services to meet the 

future demand brought on by these changes in population. Forecasts predict that economic 

growth in Texas will more than double from 2010 to 2035, with the manufacturing and 

information sectors expected to have the highest rates of growth. The Oklahoma economy is 

expected to grow in manufacturing and services as well as agriculture and will continue to 

diversify. Long-range transportation plans in Texas and Oklahoma have identified the need to 

improve passenger rail services to meet the future demand brought on by these changes in 

population. 

With existing congestion along major freeways, passenger rail service will reduce overall fuel 

consumption and create a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions can be expected. There is a 

need to enhance rail as a modal choice to move passengers from air travel and private vehicle 

travel modes, which would improve the efficiency of passenger rail by increasing the number of 

passengers per train. There is also a need to improve air quality in the Program study area. There 

is a need for faster, more reliable passenger rail service to enhance its attractiveness as an 

intercity modal alternative. 

1.2 Background 

The IH‐35 corridor, running from Duluth, Minn., to Laredo, Texas, is one of the fastest growing 

regions in the U.S., extending through 6 of the largest urban areas and 9 of the 50 largest cities in 

the U.S. The population in the area spanning Dallas and Fort Worth, Austin, and San Antonio 

has been growing rapidly over the past several decades, with growth rates in some areas as high 

as 27 percent. Texas has grown in population to become the second most populous state in the 

U.S., with most of the state’s population centered in the eastern half of the state along and east of 

the IH‐35 corridor, the most important travel corridor in Texas. 

IH‐35 is also one of the most strategic trade routes in the U.S., with Oklahoma and Texas at the 

crossroads with links north to south and east to west for shipping goods into and across the U.S. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-3 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

This means that international truck traffic demand, intercity truck traffic demand, and passenger 

travel demand compete for highway capacity, creating massive congestion inside the urban areas 

through which the highway runs. Projections for the Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio 

portion of the corridor show that average speeds along IH‐35 would drop from 55 to 15 miles per 

hour (mph) by 2035 if improvements are not made to the highway system, according to TxDOT 

Research Project 0‐5930 Potential for Development of an Intercity Passenger Transit System in 

Texas. 

The purpose of TOPRS is to evaluate alternatives to provide higher speed passenger rail service 

to meet future intercity travel demand and to improve rail facilities, reduce journey times, and 

improve connections with regional public transit services. This Study will evaluate alternatives 

for passenger rail service development to meet intercity travel demand, which includes improved 

passenger rail service on existing rail routes and new passenger rail service. Passenger rail 

service can operate at different speeds and frequencies. Conventional rail primarily uses existing 

tracks, with an average speed of 45 to 60 mph and maximum speeds of 70 to 90 mph. 

Conventional rail typically operates three to six trains per day in each direction, with stops 15 to 

60 miles apart. Higher speed rail uses some dedicated tracks, with an average speed of 70 to 85 

mph and maximum speeds of 110 to 125 mph. Higher speed rail typically operates four to eight 

trains per day in each direction, with stops 30 to 90 miles apart. High-speed rail uses fully 

dedicated tracks, with an average speed of 100 to 140 mph and maximum speeds of 165 to 

220 mph. High-speed rail typically operates 12 to 24 trains per day in each direction, with stops 

50 to 100+ miles apart. 

TxDOT has received a grant from FRA to prepare a service-level EIS in accordance with the 

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). ODOT is a partnering state agency in the 

development of the EIS. The EIS will comply with FRA’s Procedures for Considering 

Environmental Impacts (64 Federal Register 28545 [May 26, 1999]) (FRA Environmental 

Procedures) and the White House Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQs) NEPA 

implementing regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] §§ 1500-08). A service 

development plan will then be prepared to guide further development of the preferred alternative 

selected through the EIS process. 

An NOI to prepare a service-level EIS for the Program was issued on March 7, 2013, and 

published in the Federal Register on March 13, 2013. In the NOI, public agencies with legal 

jurisdiction were requested to advise TxDOT and the FRA of the applicable permit and 

environmental review requirements of each agency, as well as the scope and content of the 

environmental information germane to the agency’s statutory responsibilities in connection with 

the proposed project. Public scoping meetings were announced and held as an important 

component of the public scoping process for both the state and federal environmental review, as 

well as the general public. After the public scoping process, the analysis of existing conditions 

and potential impacts of project alternatives will then be documented into the draft service-level 

EIS. A service-level EIS evaluates and compares alternatives at a high level, described in terms 

of corridors, general routes, potential station cities, and overall levels of service, in order to make 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-4 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

decisions about which route and/or service should be carried forward for further development 

and subsequent project-level environmental review. Publication of the draft service-level EIS is 

anticipated in 2014 with a 45-day comment period to provide the public the opportunity to 

review the EIS and to provide comments. After the public comment period and the review of 

agency and public comments on the draft EIS, TxDOT, in conjunction with FRA, will identify 

preferred route and service alternatives. The final service-level EIS is expected to be completed 

in 2014 with issuance of a ROD by late 2014. The ROD will determine that the EIS process is 

complete and allow TxDOT and FRA to move forward with the selected Program alternative for 

subsequent further development and project-level environmental review. Figure 1-1 summarizes 

the TOPRS schedule, including the service-level EIS. 

1.3 Description of Program 

The Program service-level EIS will consider a No Action Alternative and a range of alternatives 

that will be determined during the alternatives analysis process. The No Project Alternative (noproject or no-build) represents the conditions in the Program corridor as it existed in 2013 and as 

it would exist based on programmed and funded improvements to the intercity transportation 

system and other reasonably foreseeable projects. The service-level EIS will evaluate a 

reasonable range of corridor alternatives and make decisions regarding the preferred corridor, 

location of train service termini, location of intermediate stops, level of service, and future 

planning for projects to implement the service. During public scoping, input was provided on 

preferred routes, potential station locations, and service-level alternatives, as well as the 

frequency of passenger rail service, for further consideration by TxDOT and FRA. 

The Program corridor is an approximately 850‐mile north/south corridor roughly paralleling IH35, originating in the north at Oklahoma City and terminating in south Texas, including the cities 

of Laredo, Corpus Christi, and the Rio Grande Valley region (Figure 1-2). To ensure that 

planning considers the unique character and interrelationships among the key regional rail 

market areas in the Program corridor, the analysis will consider the overall corridor as well as 

each of the three city pair sections: 

 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth 

 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio 

 Southern Section: San Antonio to south Texas 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-5 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Figure 1-1: Program Steps and Schedule 

 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-6 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Figure 1-2: Proposed Program System 

 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-7 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

These three sections represent existing and anticipated future intercity passenger rail markets 

with differentiated passenger rail service needs. Regional networks beyond the Program corridor 

will be considered to the degree necessary to fully inform service development planning and 

service environmental work for the Program corridor. 

1.4 Purpose of Public Scoping 

Scoping is an important element in the process of determining the focus and content of an EIS. 

Scoping helps to identify the range of actions, alternatives, environmental effects, and mitigation 

measures to be analyzed in depth and helps eliminate from detailed study those issues that are 

not pertinent to the final decision on the proposed study. Scoping is also an effective way to 

bring together and address the concerns of affected agencies, any affected Tribe, and other 

interested parties, including the public. Significant issues may be identified through public and 

agency comments. The CEQ Regulations Section 1501.7 describes scoping as a required early 

and open process to be used in preparing an EIS under NEPA. 

Scoping is not conducted to resolve differences concerning the merits of a project or to anticipate 

the ultimate decision on a proposal. Rather, scoping helps ensure that a comprehensive EIS will 

be prepared that informs the decision-making process. As part of the Program, a public scoping 

process was implemented that included notifications, meetings, online tools, and other 

opportunities for interested parties to become aware of the Program and to provide scoping 

comments. 

The intent of the Program public scoping process is to: 

 Inform public agencies and interested members of the public about the proposed Study, 

including compliance with NEPA requirements, and the FRA’s and TxDOT’s actions in 

relation to the Study. 

 Assist with identifying a range of alignments and potential station locations along the 

Program corridor that may be considered in the EIS. 

 Assist with identifying the range of concerns and study-related issues to be considered in the 

EIS. 

 Assist with identifying mitigation measures, strategies, and approaches to mitigation that 

may be useful and explored further in the EIS. 

 Develop an expanded mailing list of agencies and individuals interested in the future actions 

relative to the EIS. 

The public scoping process and the input gathered during the scoping period are documented 

herein for the Program service-level EIS. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-8 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

1.5 Notification of EIS Scoping 

Public scoping activities for the draft service-level EIS were conducted between March 13 and 

April 26, 2013 (scoping period), with the 12 scoping meetings scheduled between March 25 and 

April 4, 2013. The process was initiated by the issuance of the NOI (Appendix A). The federal 

process began with the publication of the NOI in the Federal Register on March 13, 2013. The 

NOI discussed the background of the Program system, the purpose of the passenger rail system, 

and the role of public involvement during the scoping process. The NOI also provided contact 

names for additional information regarding the Study and listed the dates and locations of public 

scoping meetings. 

Notification for the scoping period consisted of multiple media outlets, existing stakeholder 

mailing lists, and social media notification. For each announcement method used by the 

consultant team, information regarding the scoping purpose and methods for providing 

comments was outlined in English, as well as general project information provided in Spanish. 

The following sections describe the specific notification methods and timeframe of the 

notification, and Table 1-1 summarizes this information. 

1.5.1 Print Media 

Print media included press releases, paid newspaper advertisements, and newsletters. Sections 

1.5.1.1 through 1.5.1.3 summarize the notification efforts through the print media, and copies of 

the print media are included in Appendix B.

1.5.1.1 Press Release 

TxDOT distributed a press release throughout the Program corridor. Targeted press releases were 

distributed to the relevant media outlets 10 days before each scoping open house. 

1.5.1.2 Paid Newspaper Advertisements 

Paid newspaper advertisements describing the overall scoping process and opportunities for 

comment were published in newspapers as listed below; each ad included three dates at meeting 

locations in proximity of the papers’ distribution areas as a way to encourage attendance. Each 

advertisement included the Study website address for information about other scoping meeting 

dates. 

 Dallas Morning News – Monday, March 11, 2013 

 Austin American Statesman – Tuesday, March 12, 2013 

 Caller-Times (Corpus Christi) - Tuesday, March 12, 2013 

 Daily Ardmoreite (Ardmore) – Tuesday, March 12, 2013 

 Daily Oklahoman (Oklahoma City) – Tuesday, March 12, 2013 

 Fort Worth Star-Telegram – Tuesday, March 12, 2013 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-9 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 Herald Democrat (Sherman-Denison) – Tuesday, March 12, 2013 

 Killeen Daily Herald – Tuesday, March 12, 2013 

 Laredo Morning Times – Tuesday, March 12, 2013 

 San Antonio Express News – Tuesday, March 12, 2013 

 Brownsville Herald – Wednesday, March 13, 2013 

 Waco Tribune-Herald – Tuesday, March 14, 2013 

1.5.1.3 Newsletter 

A four-page newsletter was created to provide more detailed information about the scoping 

process, in both English and Spanish. It was distributed electronically to the stakeholder email 

list, with a request that this information also be distributed to the interested parties lists. 

Additionally, it was provided to metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and transit 

agencies for distribution in print. It was also available for open house attendees to use as a 

reference and to distribute to their neighbors or organizations. 

1.5.2 Electronic Notification 

Electronic notification included updates to the study website, email recipients, and social media 

(see Table 1-1). Sections 1.5.2.1 through 1.5.2.3 summarize the electronic notification efforts, 

and copies are included in Appendix C. 

1.5.2.1 Study Website 

The Study website advertised the scoping period information and event details, in both English 

and Spanish. An online open house, also in both languages, was available for those who could 

not attend one of the 12 meetings. 

1.5.2.2 Email 

A poster announcing all 12 scoping meeting dates and other opportunities for submitting scoping 

comments was created and sent to previously engaged stakeholders. This list included over 200 

organizations, local jurisdictional agencies, and transit agencies, among others. Emails were sent 

to these stakeholders asking them to forward the poster electronically to their existing mailing 

lists and to place the printed posters in areas with high public visibility them, such as offices, 

meeting locations, public notice boards, and other locations. 

Geographically targeted email reminders were also sent to the stakeholder list prior to each 

scoping open house. 

1.5.2.3 Social Media 

TxDOT’s Facebook and Twitter accounts announced the scoping process and scoping open 

houses 1 week and then 1 day prior to each meeting. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-10 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 1-1: Notification Methods, Timeframe, and Targeted Audience 

Outreach/Notification Timeframe Audience Spanish Language 

Press release Starting Thursday, 

March 21, 2013 

Newspaper-reading 

public and agency 

members 

No 

Newspaper paid ad:

Dallas Morning News 

Monday, March 11, 

2013 

Newspaper-reading 

public and agency 

members 

Yes 

Newspaper paid ad: 

 Austin American 

Statesman 

 Caller-Times (Corpus 

Christi) 

 Daily Ardmoreite 

(Ardmore) 

 Daily Oklahoman 

(Oklahoma City) 

 Fort Worth StarTelegram Herald 

 Democrat (ShermanDenison) 

 Killeen Daily Herald 

 Laredo Morning Times 

 San Antonio Express 

News 

Tuesday, March 12, 

2013 

Newspaper-reading 

public and agency 

members 

Yes 

Brownsville Herald Wednesday, March 

13, 2013 

Newspaper-reading 

public and agency 

members 

Yes 

Waco Tribune-Herald Tuesday, March 14, 

2013 

Newspaper-reading 

public and agency 

members 

Yes 

Poster and newsletter 

emailed to stakeholders 

Wednesday, March 

13, 2013, and Friday, 

March 29, 2013 

Local agencies, 

community 

organizations, 

transportation agencies, 

other stakeholders 

Email in English 

only, materials in 

Spanish and English 

Poster mounted in public 

places 

Starting Wednesday, 

March 13, 2013 

Stakeholder meeting 

locations, MPO 

meeting locations 

Yes 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-11 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Outreach/Notification Timeframe Audience Spanish Language 

Newsletter available at 

MPO and TxDOT 

locations 

Starting Wednesday, 

March 13, 2013 

Stakeholder meeting 

locations, MPO 

meeting locations 

Yes 

TxDOT Facebook and 

Twitter 

Monday, March 25, 

2013, through April 5, 

2013 

Younger, 

transportation-minded 

public; general public; 

and local agencies 

No 

Study website Monday, March 11, 

2013 

General public, 

transportation-minded 

public, and local 

agencies 

Yes 

Reminder emails about 

open houses 

Monday, March 18; 

Monday, March 25; 

and Friday, March 29 

Local agencies, 

community 

organizations, 

transportation agencies, 

other stakeholders 

Email in English 

only, materials in 

Spanish and English 

1.5.3 Media Coverage 

In addition to print media and electronic notification, many newspaper articles and TV clips 

covered the study and the scoping process and advertised the open houses. Sections 1.5.3.1 and 

1.5.3.2 summarize the media coverage during March and April 2013. 

1.5.3.1 March 2013 

 March 14, 2013 - “TxDOT, feds wants to know how you feel about the ‘Texas-Oklahoma 

Passenger Rail Study’ they’re conducting.” Dallas Morning News [Dallas, Texas]. 

http://transportationblog.dallasnews.com/2013/03/txdot-feds-wants-to-know-how-you-feelabout-the-texas-oklahoma-passenger-rail-study-theyre-conducting.html/

 March 25, 2013 - “State studying passenger rail options to possibly include Waco-area 

stops.” Waco Tribune-Herald [Waco, Texas]. www.wacotrib.com/news/roadstransporation/state-studying-passenger-rail-options-to-possibly-include-wacoarea/article_e07a120e-1c20-5d42-967a-742cdb2ec168.html

 March 25, 2013 - “TxDOT passenger rail meetings start Monday in Waco.” Waco TribuneHerald [Waco, Texas]. www.wacotrib.com/news/mclennan_county/txdot-passenger-railmeetings-start-monday-in-waco/article_97cf4817-815b-5ce1-90fa-4b95e83b011b.html

 March 25, 2013 - “Central Texas: Input Needed For Proposed Texas-Oklahoma Passenger 

Rail” Our Town Texas [Waco, Texas]. www.kwtx.com/ourtown/home/headlines/CentralTexas-Input-Needed-For-Proposed-Texas-Oklahoma-Passenger-Rail-199900111.html
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-12 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 March 26, 2013 - “TxDOT and ODOT ask for public opinion on proposed passenger rail.” 

KXII [Texoma, Texas]. www.kxii.com/news/headlines/T-200158391.html

 March 26, 2013 - “TxDOT to hold meetings about potential rail corridor to Oklahoma.” 

WFFA.com [Fort Worth, Texas]. www.wfaa.com/news/local/TXDoOT--200061371.html

 March 27, 2013 - "Texas-Oklahoma passenger rail reps speak with residents." 

Ardmoreite.com [Ardmore, Okla.]. 

www.ardmoreite.com/article/20130327/NEWS/130329783

 March 29, 2013 - “Public Input Requested for Passenger Rail Expansion Study.” 

KRISTV.com [Corpus Christi, Texas]. www.kristv.com/news/public-input-requested-forpassenger-rail-expansion-study/

 March 29, 2013 - “Public hearing set for passenger rail service.” Valley Morning Star

[Harlingen, Texas]. www.valleymorningstar.com/news/article_5fdd8b10-98e6-11e2-85da001a4bcf6878.html

 March 30, 2013 - “TxDOT considers rail service along IH-35 corridor; meeting Monday.” 

KENS5.com [San Antonio, Texas]. www.kens5.com/news/TxDOT-considers-rail-service--

200736301.html

 March 30, 2013 - “Passenger railroad service topic for hearing.” Brownsville Herald 

[Brownsville, Texas]. www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/valley/article_a3d9dca0-9996-

11e2-8956-001a4bcf6878.html

1.5.3.2 April 2013 

 April 1, 2013 - “High-speed passenger trains a sign of the future throughout Texas?” WOAI 

News Channel 4 [San Antonio, Texas]. http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/High-speedpassenger-trains-a-sign-of-the-future/Tyy5PSjCjE2p1DVcvxcvaw.cspx

 April 1, 2013 - “New ways studied to clear congestion on IH-35.” KENS5.com [San Antonio, 

Texas]. http://www.kens5.com/news/Study-of-passenger-rail-from-Oklahoma-City-to-SouthTexas-underway-200969251.html

 April 1, 2013 - “TxDOT asks for public input on passenger rail.” KSAT [San Antonio, 

Texas]. http://www.ksat.com/news/TxDOT-asks-for-public-input-on-passenger-rail/-

/478452/19555520/-/7cy7j8/-/index.html

 April 1, 2013 - "Texas-Oklahoma passenger rail options studied, discussed." Norman 

Transcript [Norman, Okla.]. http://normantranscript.com/headlines/x1916523020/TexasOklahoma-passenger-rail-options-studied-discussed
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-13 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 April 2, 2013 - “TxDOT will hold town hall for passenger rail line.” LMTonline.com

[Laredo, Texas]. 

www.lmtonline.com/articles/2013/04/02/front/news/doc515b6e6949408826283720.txt

 April 2, 2013 - “TxDOT will hold town hall for passenger rail line.” LMTonline.com

[Laredo, Texas]. www.lmtonline.com/articles/2013/04/02/front/news/ 

doc515b6e6949408826283720.txt

 April 3, 2013 - “Area residents sound off on proposed rail system.” LMTonline.com [Laredo, 

Texas]. 

www.lmtonline.com/articles/2013/04/03/front/news/doc515ce07460f0e571203776.txt

 April 4, 2013 - “Rail hearing notes Texas-Oklahoma costs, benefits.” Brownsville Herald 

[Brownsville, Texas]. www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/local/article_64b1e0b2-9d9d-11e2-

b19f-001a4bcf6878.html

1.6 Scoping Process 

During the 45-day scoping period, TxDOT asked the public, tribes, and other agencies to 

comment on what factors to analyze in the EIS. Specifically, TxDOT asked for input on the 

following topics: 

 Purpose and need for the proposed passenger rail study 

 Reasonable range of alternatives 

 Potentially affected resources and extent of analysis for those resources 

The public provided scoping comments using multiple methods between the publication of the 

NOI on March 13 and the end of the comment period, on April 26, 2013. Comments provided in 

the following formats were collected: 

 In writing at a scoping meeting 

 Verbally at scoping meetings (court reporters were present in Laredo and Harlingen) 

 Through the Study website’s comment form (www.txokrail.org/comment) 

 By mail to Program, 12750 Merit Drive, Suite 1100, Dallas, Texas, 75251 

1.6.1 In-Person Open Houses 

TxDOT hosted 12 public scoping open houses; each included the same information and followed 

the same format. Meeting locations were Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible, 

transit accessible (where possible), and accommodated a minimum of 100 people in a single 

large room. Each lasted from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m., during which time community members were 

invited to: 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 1-14 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 Listen to a brief presentation orienting participants to the meeting, the information available, 

and how to provide comments. (A looped PowerPoint presentation with Spanish narration 

was available.) 

 Review display boards describing the scoping process, the NEPA process, draft purpose and 

need statements, a proposed range of service levels, and a proposed range of conceptual 

alternatives. 

 Talk to TxDOT and consultant staff about the service-level NEPA process and ask questions. 

 Complete a comment card providing scoping comments, in English or Spanish. 

 Provide verbal comments to a court reporter (only in Laredo and Harlingen), in English or 

Spanish. 

Translation services were provided upon request, and signs were provided indicating where 

participants could attend the Spanish-narrated PowerPoint presentation. In south Texas, each 

meeting had at least one Spanish-speaking staff member present. A looped, Spanish-narrated 

PowerPoint presentation was projected from a laptop at each meeting. Copies of the public 

scoping meeting materials, including the comment form in English and Spanish, are included in 

Appendix D. 

1.6.2 Online Scoping Open House 

In addition to in-person scoping meetings, the Study’s website included an online scoping 

meeting that was “open” for the duration of the 45-day scoping period. The online scoping 

meeting included: 

 Embedded graphics describing the scoping process, the NEPA process, draft purpose and 

need statements, a proposed range of service levels, and a proposed range of conceptual 

alternatives (identical to display boards for public scoping open houses). 

 A web-based form (in English and Spanish) for providing scoping comments. 

 A Spanish-narrated PowerPoint presentation that included each display board. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 2-1 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

2.0 Public and Agency Involvement During Scoping 

Throughout the scoping period, TxDOT and FRA encouraged public and agency input through a 

variety of activities. As noted above, the FRA published the NOI in the Federal Register on 

March 13, 2013, initiating the public scoping process. There were a number of meetings 

scheduled for all three sections prior to and during the scoping period, which included 3 agency 

meetings, 12 public scoping meetings, and 1 environmental interest group meeting. Table 2-1 

lists the dates and locations of the meetings. Public scoping meetings are summarized in Section 

2.1, and Section 2.2 and 2.3 summarize agency and other meetings. 

TABLE 2-1: Public Scoping Meetings and Locations within the Program 

Corridor 

Date/Time City Location/Address 

PUBLIC SCOPING MEETINGS 

Northern Section 

March 25, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.

Oklahoma City, OK Metro Tech Center 

1900 Springlake Drive 

Oklahoma City, OK 

March 26, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

Ardmore, OK Ardmore Train Station 

251 E. Main Street 

Ardmore, OK

April 1, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

Belton, TX Central Texas Council of Governments 

Training Room 

2180 N. Main Street 

Belton, TX

April 2, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

Sherman, TX Sherman Senior Center 

1500 N. Broughton Street 

Sherman, TX

Central Section 

March 25, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

Waco, TX Heart of Texas Council of Governments, 

Training Room 

1514 S. New Road 

Waco, TX

March 27, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

Austin, TX Texas Department of Transportation 

Austin District Office, Building 7 

7901 N. IH 35 

Austin, TX
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 2-2 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Date/Time City Location/Address 

March 28, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

Fort Worth, TX Texas Department of Transportation 

Training Offices 

2501 SW Loop 820 

Fort Worth, TX

April 3, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

Dallas, TX Minority Supplier Development Council 

(MSDC) Offices 

8828 N. Stemmons Freeway 

Suite 550 

Dallas, TX

Southern Section 

April 1, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

San Antonio, TX Windcrest Civic Center 

9310 Jim Seal Drive 

Windcrest, TX

April 2, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

Corpus Christi, TX Texas Department of Transportation 

1701 S. Padre Island Drive 

Corpus Christi, TX

April 3, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

Laredo, TX Texas Department of Transportation 

1817 Bob Bullock Avenue 

Laredo, TX

April 4, 2013 

6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 

Harlingen, TX Harlingen Town Hall 

118 E. Tyler Avenue 

Harlingen, TX

AGENCY SCOPING MEETINGS 

March 25, 2013 

2:00 p.m.- 4:00 p.m. 

Oklahoma City, OK Metro Tech Center 

1900 Springlake Drive 

Oklahoma City, OK

March 27, 2013 

2:0 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. 

Austin, TX Texas Department of Transportation 

Austin District Office, Building 7 

7901 N. IH 35 

Austin, TX

April 3, 2013 

2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. 

Dallas, TX MSDC Offices 

8828 N. Stemmons Freeway 

Suite 550 

Dallas, TX

ENVIRONMENAL INTEREST GROUP MEETINGS 

April 18, 2013 Austin, TX Texas Department of Transportation 

Building 200, Room 1A-2 

200 E. Riverside Drive 

Austin, TX 78704
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 2-3 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

2.1 Summary of Public Scoping Meetings 

Public scoping meetings were open to both the general public and agencies. Approximately 340 

people attended the public scoping meetings and approximately 1,200 comments were submitted 

online, by email, and at an open house in writing; also, at two open houses court reporters 

recorded verbal comments. U.S. Census data from 2010 indicated small areas with a low literacy 

level in south Texas. In these cases, a court reporter was sent to record verbal comments, in 

Harlingen and Laredo; the court reporter was provided with a bilingual staffer to translate for 

non-English-speaking populations in the area that might wish to provide verbal comments. Three 

comments were collected this way in Laredo and Harlingen. More than 1,140 online comments 

were collected through the Study website’s comment form, which was available in both English 

and Spanish; however, there were about 70 duplicate emails, resulting in approximately 1,070 

comments. Twenty-six comments were also collected through letters, and about 50 emails were 

sent directly to TxDOT. Approximately 340 people attended the open houses, and 56 written 

comments were collected at these events. Of the 1,300-plus comments, most were from the 

general public, and approximately 25 were from business owners or organizations, while about 

10 comments were collected from state or local agencies. 

The open house format featured display boards in a U-shaped area around the room, providing 

information to attendees about the purpose and need of this study, maps of the areas being 

reviewed, different options that could be reviewed, and how to get involved in the process. 

Newsletters and guides to scoping were handed out to all meeting attendees and comment forms 

were available to either fill out during the meeting or to take home and mail in. A PowerPoint 

presentation showing all of the display boards in Spanish and featuring Spanish narration was 

available to meeting attendees. TxDOT, ODOT, and consultant staff were present and available 

at all meetings to answer questions about the Study. 

The comments provided during the public scoping meetings are summarized and described 

briefly in the following sections. Copies of the materials provided at the public scoping meetings 

are included in Appendix D. 

2.1.1 Oklahoma City, OK – March 25, 2013 

On March 25, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the Metro Tech Center. Thirty-one 

attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, which is on file with TxDOT and ODOT. Comment 

forms were handed out to all meeting attendees, and five of the forms were returned at the end of 

the meeting. A letter addressed to Mark Werner, Project Manager – TxDOT, was also included 

in the comment box. Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Provide alternative to car travel along IH-35 

 Provide accessibility for passengers with special needs, including the blind, disabled, and 

elderly 

 Allow new audiences access to local businesses 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 2-4 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 Increase visitor travel 

 Concern about speed at grade crossings 

 Concern about noise increase within current rail corridor 

 Affordable rail service could provide for an increase in tourism 

 Boost economy with increased ridership 

 Provide alternative to highway travel between cities 

 Reduce travel times between major cities 

 Reduce pollution from car traffic 

 Allow passengers to carry on bicycles, crated pets, and luggage 

2.1.2 Waco, TX – March 25, 2013 

On March 25, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the Heart of Texas Council of 

Governments. Twenty-one attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, which is on record with 

TxDOT. Comment forms were handed out to all meeting attendees and three comment forms 

were returned at the end of the meeting. Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Increase travel to cities along the corridor 

 Business travelers could work while traveling 

 IH-35 needs transit alternatives to reduce traffic 

 Less pollution than cars from the highway 

 Increase frequency of trains running between cities to encourage business travelers to take 

the train 

2.1.3 Ardmore, OK – March 26, 2013 

On March 26, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the Ardmore Train Station. 

Fourteen attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, on record with TxDOT and ODOT. 

Comment forms were handed out to all meeting attendees and three comment forms were 

returned at the end of the meeting. Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Increase mobility between Dallas and Fort Worth, Oklahoma City, and Ardmore 

 Accessibility for passengers with special needs, including the blind, disabled, and elderly 

 More frequent schedules would make larger cities more accessible 

 Noise from trains at rail crossings 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 2-5 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 Boost economy and revitalize towns with existing train stations 

 Increase tourism for weekend and holiday stays 

 Reduce highway traffic if train schedules were timely 

 Decrease highway congestion by providing alternative to highway travel 

 Reduce pollution from car traffic 

 Allow passengers to carry on bicycles, crated pets, and luggage 

 Connections expanding further north than Oklahoma City 

 Prioritize high-speed rail from Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio, then higher speed rail 

from Dallas to Oklahoma City and San Antonio to south Texas, with high-speed rail 

eventually replacing all of the higher speed rail lines. 

 Frequency of trains is the most important aspect to increase ridership 

2.1.4 Austin, TX – March 27, 2013 

On March 27, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the TxDOT Austin office. Fortytwo attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, on record with TxDOT. Comment forms were 

handed out to all meeting attendees and seven comment forms were returned at the end of the 

meeting. Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Increase business travel along corridor 

 Provide alternative to driving along IH-35 

 Need increased frequency of trains running between cities to encourage business travelers to 

take the train 

 Lower impact along existing rail lines, but with increased frequency 

 Electric trains would be quieter 

 Boost regional tourism between stops along the corridor 

 Reduce traffic on IH-35 

 Use an elevated rail to minimize impacts on current right-of-way 

 Consider maglev as environmentally friendly option 

 Improve air quality from less traffic on highways and air traffic 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 2-6 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

2.1.5 Fort Worth, TX – March 28, 2013 

On March 28, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the TxDOT Fort Worth office. 

Twenty-five attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, on record with TxDOT. Comment forms 

were handed out to all meeting attendees and three comment forms were returned at the end of 

the meeting. Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Provide alternative to driving along IH-35 

 Stops located in both Dallas and Fort Worth would be convenient 

 Boost regional tourism between stops along the corridor 

 Could reduce IH-35 traffic 

 Decrease air traffic by providing alternative 

 Improve air quality from less traffic on highways and less air traffic 

 Connection needs to go through DFW Airport to increase travelers 

2.1.6 Belton, TX – April 1, 2013 

On April 1, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the Central Texas Council of 

Governments. Thirty-eight attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, on record with TxDOT. 

Comment forms were handed out to all meeting attendees and five comment forms were returned 

at the end of the meeting. Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Provide alternative to driving along IH-35 

 Create passenger rail south of San Antonio 

 Noise needs to be minimal near neighborhoods and through towns 

 Boost regional tourism between stops along the corridor 

 Stay within highway rights-of-way to avoid farmlands 

 Could reduce highway traffic 

 Improve air quality from less traffic on highways and less airplane traffic 

 Increase frequency of current Amtrak trains and add cars to allow for more passengers 

 Create additional public transportation from train stations to other locations within cities (i.e., 

bus routes) 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 2-7 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

2.1.7 San Antonio, TX – April 1, 2013 

On April 1, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the Windcrest Civic Center. Twentythree attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, on record with TxDOT. Comment forms were 

handed out to all meeting attendees and six comment forms were returned at the end of the 

meeting. Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Connect trains into Kansas to expand rail connection options 

 Allow bicycles as carry-ons on trains 

 Frequency of service is more important than higher speeds 

 Stations need better parking and platforms than current stations 

 Boost economy in areas south of San Antonio 

 High-speed rail would be beneficial between Dallas and San Antonio 

2.1.8 Sherman, TX – April 1, 2013 

On April 1, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the Sherman Senior Center. Twentytwo attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, on record with TxDOT. Comment forms were 

handed out to all meeting attendees and one comment form was returned at the end of the 

meeting. Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Provide safe transportation for riders that coexist with freight traffic 

 Different track options need to be reviewed, both current tracks and new infrastructure 

 Development along the corridor would have to be paid for to support the tracks 

 Limit vehicle and pedestrian traffic within the high-speed rail right-of-way 

 Need to work in conjunction with Lone Star Rail District and Cotton Belt Rail District 

2.1.9 Corpus Christi, TX – April 2, 2013 

On April 2, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the TxDOT office in Corpus Christi, 

TX. Nineteen attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, on record with TxDOT. Comment forms 

were handed out to all meeting attendees and six comment forms were returned at the end of the 

meeting. Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Improve travel between large cities in Texas 

 Lower pollution levels by having fewer cars on the highway 

 Rail should go through a central location, not along the shoreline 

 Boost tourism 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 2-8 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 Have rental car agencies at the depot 

 Need safe railroad crossings at grade-level crossings 

 Reduce traffic congestion 

 Upgrade existing rail lines to use for passenger rail 

 Coordinate with other local public transportation for scheduling purposes 

2.1.10 Dallas, TX – April 3, 2013 

On April 3, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the MSDC offices. Twenty-nine 

attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, on record with TxDOT. Comment forms were handed 

out to all meeting attendees and five comment forms were returned at the end of the meeting. 

Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Alignments could alter traffic to local businesses 

 Benefit economy by having a well-planned schedule to allow for business travelers 

 Reduce pollution levels from less highway traffic 

 Focus on dedicated high-speed rail between Dallas and San Antonio 

 Direct connections to Dallas need to be created, rather than Fort Worth or DFW Airport 

 High-speed rail needs to be faster than what auto travel time would be to encourage people to 

ride the train instead of drive 

2.1.11 Laredo, TX – April 3, 2013 

On April 3, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the TxDOT Laredo office. Thirtyone attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, on record with TxDOT. Comment forms were 

handed out to all meeting attendees and five comment forms were returned at the end of the 

meeting. Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Improvements to pollution and traffic outweigh cons of noise 

 Boost economy with a stop in Laredo 

 Lower highway fatalities by taking cars off the road 

 Reduce oil dependence 

 Extend line into Mexico 

 Higher speed preferred to shorten travel times 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 2-9 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

2.1.12 Harlingen, TX – April 4, 2013 

On April 4, 2013, TxDOT held a public scoping meeting at the Harlingen Town Hall. Forty-two 

attendees were listed on the sign-in sheet, on record with TxDOT. Comment forms were handed 

out to all meeting attendees and seven comment forms were returned at the end of the meeting. 

Multiple comments focused on the following issues: 

 Offer free parking for rail passengers 

 Work with connection to possible commuter rail built in the Valley 

 Provide an alternative for highway traffic 

 Boost tourism and economy 

 Increase in taxes could cause negative effects on agriculture, tourism, and other businesses 

 Elevate tracks to minimize safety issues 

 Provide easy, relaxing travel alternative 

2.2 Agency Scoping Meetings 

TxDOT hosted one pre-scoping agency meeting on February 26, 2013m and three agency 

scoping meetings, which were held the same day as three public open houses in Oklahoma City, 

Austin, and Dallas. These agency meetings were held from 2:00 to 4:00 p.m. on the same day as 

the public scoping meeting in the three respective locations. The interest of the agencies in the 

study during the pre-scoping meeting was documented using a form that asked for contact 

information and a statement of interest. The agencies were encouraged to submit comments 

during the scoping process and invited to attend the public scoping meetings. Agencies were 

asked to provide formal scoping comments in writing prior to the end of the scoping period. 

Transit districts, counties, cities, and MPOs, as well as state and federal regulatory agencies, 

were invited to the agency scoping meetings. 

2.3 Summary of Other Related Outreach Activities 

In addition to the public and agency scoping meetings described above, a few additional outreach 

activities were conducted just prior to the start of the scoping period. These events were 

conducted to increase awareness of the scoping process and the Study as a whole, as well as to 

encourage and request feedback and input. 

2.3.1 Stakeholder Workshops 

A stakeholder workshop was held for elected officials, transit agencies, and other organizations 

that were interested in the study. These stakeholders were encouraged to attend and to help 

advertise the public open houses to their constituents. This meeting was held three times during 

February 2013, with the same content presented at each meeting. A meeting was planned for 

February 25 in Oklahoma City, but a snowstorm prevented the meeting from taking place. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 2-10 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

2.3.2 Environmental Interest Group Meeting 

A meeting was held to inform the environmental groups about the Study and to encourage them 

to invite their constituents and members to attend the public open houses. This meeting was held 

on April 18, 2013, at the TxDOT office in Austin. The groups were identified by the public 

involvement team based upon previous interest and work with TxDOT. These groups were 

invited by phone to attend. The information presented and discussed was the same as at the 

stakeholder meetings. No comments were received during this meeting. 

2.3.3 Tribal Coordination 

FRA mailed invitation letters to 26 federally recognized tribes in Oklahoma and Texas on April 

11, 2013, to initiate government-to-government contact, alert them of the study, and invite them 

to participate in the scoping process. Two responses have been received by FRA. The Delaware 

Nation expressed interest in the study and study area and confirmed they will be a consulting 

party. Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma requested additional information for their review to more 

thoroughly evaluate their interest in relation to this project for National Historic Preservation Act 

Section 106 review. FRA will schedule meetings with the tribes. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-1 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

3.0 Scoping Summary of Issues 

The scoping efforts included opportunities for the public to provide input on the purpose and 

need, on possible future passenger rail routes, potential station locations, and service levels, as 

well as on environmental issues. The Program scoping process identified issues with the 

proposed sections, suggestions for alignment and station locations, and areas of potential concern 

related to the Study. The comments received during the scoping process are summarized below. 

Comments were submitted in the following ways: 

 Via Study website 

 Verbally to court reporters at public scoping meetings 

 Comment forms submitted at public scoping meetings 

 Mailed comment forms 

 Mailed personal comment letters 

 Mailed agency letters 

 Emails 

Approximately 1,200 comments from agencies, organizations, and individuals were received, 

and several individuals submitted two or more comments. Tables 3-1 through Table 3-4 (at the 

end of this section) reproduce the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by 

commenter and then categorized by topic area. The scanned images of the complete original 

comments are reproduced in Appendices E through G. Appendix H provides a summary of the 

comments received with a tally by topic. 

In general, the comments addressed the following topics (order of the topics below has no 

significance): 

 Location of rail corridor 

 Location of stations 

 Benefits of passenger rail service, including but not limited to air quality, congestion relief, 

and economic development 

 Connections to local transit and the promotion of mass transit 

 Right-of-way 

 General support for the Study 

 Noise impacts 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-2 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 Questions about cost and financing of the system 

 Ridership 

 Regional and local economic growth 

 Employment opportunities 

 Potential devaluation of property 

 Parks and recreation 

 Open space 

 Water quality and runoff 

 Energy consumption and technology used for the trains 

 Integration of Study with existing and planned regional and local transportation/transit efforts 

 Impacts on plant and animal species, including associated habitats 

 Impacts on wildlife corridor movement 

 Safety/hazards 

 Health 

 Agriculture – impacts on farmland and productivity/viability of agricultural activities 

 Freight and passenger rail compatibility 

3.1 Scoping Summary of Potential Alignments and Stations 

This section summarizes comments received during the public scoping process for the Program 

pertaining to potential alignments and stations, environmental impacts and constraints, and 

benefits of a passenger rail service. This discussion will guide the development of options to be 

evaluated as part of the alternatives analysis process for the Study. 

3.1.1 Support and Opposition 

A number of people expressed support for or opposition to the Program in their comments. Of 

these, most were in favor of the Program and rail in general, citing the benefits of an improved 

rail system. Sections 3.1.1.1 and 3.1.1.2 summarize these viewpoints. 

3.1.1.1 Support 

Several commenters expressed their support for high-speed rail specifically. Among the most 

frequently cited benefits were: 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-3 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 Trains keep cars off the road. 

 A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. 

 South Texas has no passenger rail service. 

 Railroad stations are more convenient than airports, and rail cars are more comfortable. 

 Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Commenters also mentioned the high price of gasoline as a benefit of switching from driving to 

rail. 

Other benefits of rail cited in the comments included: 

 Rail is a quicker and cheaper way to travel overall. 

 Rail offers improved safety and is a good travel option for those who cannot or prefer not to 

drive (e.g., don’t own a car, seniors, etc). 

 Rail could attract tourists. 

 Rail would improve the state’s economy and provide jobs. 

 Rail is better for the environment overall. 

 Rail would provide a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. 

3.1.1.2 Opposition 

The most frequently cited reasons cited by commenters in opposition were that the cost would be 

too high, that the system would not be a good use of taxpayer money or that tax money should be 

spent on other things, and that it would lead to increased debt. Other comments indicated that 

Texans are not likely to switch from cars to rail, that existing bus and air service is sufficient, and 

that eminent domain is not acceptable. Some commenters were simply opposed to a high-speed 

train option but would support incremental improvement of passenger rail. A number of 

comments cited concerns regarding the impacts on agricultural activities and production with the 

loss of farmland and/or division of farmland due to the development and operation of passenger 

rail. 

3.1.2 Cost, Affordability, and Funding 

Issues of cost, affordability, and funding of new passenger rail service were raised by a number 

of commenters. One concern was that rail travel would have to be made affordable for 

passengers and that if rail travel was not less expensive than flying, it might not be feasible. One 

suggestion to help lower travel costs was to partner with casinos. 

A number of commenters mentioned the cost of passenger rail improvements. Some felt that the 

cost would be excessive and would constitute an undue burden on taxpayers, especially 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-4 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

considering current Texas and Oklahoma budget issues. One commenter mentioned that the cost 

of the California High-Speed Train System is higher than originally projected. On the other hand, 

some commenters felt that rail would be a good investment and would ultimately cost taxpayers 

less than maintenance and construction of freeways. Some other concerns indicated that the “last 

mile” (connecting riders from train stations to their ultimate destinations) would make train 

travel costly and that trains traveling at 220 mph would not be cost-effective. 

Another frequently raised question was related to funding sources for passenger rail 

improvement projects. Several people mentioned potential funding partnerships, such as 

public/private, as a means of sharing costs with mass transit providers. Another suggestion was 

to make rail self-supporting, and that private entities and riders, not taxpayers, cover the cost 

entirely. One commenter wondered whether travelers to and from Mexico could provide a major 

source of revenue, and another suggested that a “fast parcel delivery” car be used to offset cost. 

3.1.3 Services and Amenities on Trains 

A number of people mentioned specific services and amenities that they would like to see 

offered on passenger trains. These comments included general concerns about improving rail 

cars to make travel comfortable, as well as specific suggestions like making Wi-Fi and food 

available to passengers. Some commenters also requested that they be able to bring dogs, 

luggage, and even cars on trains. The most frequent comment of this type was that passengers 

should be allowed to bring bicycles on the train. One commenter requested that travel with 

firearms be allowed. 

3.1.4 Services and Amenities at Stations 

In their comments, several people mentioned that stations should be upgraded and expanded to 

accommodate enhanced rail service. A number of commenters asked that travel connections be 

made available at stations, such as connections with other rail lines and airports, transit 

connections, shuttle buses, rental cars, and bike-share programs. Another frequent comment was 

that adequate and safe long- and short-term parking should be made available at stations. 

Commenters indicated that access should be provided for wheelchairs and disabled people. Other 

comments included suggestions to provide auto kiosks at unattended stations, and that the 

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) not be included. 

3.1.5 Station Locations 

Many people commented on cities they would like to see connected by rail. The most frequently 

mentioned connections were to Houston, Laredo, Brownsville/Harlingen, Waco, and north from 

Oklahoma City to Kansas City and beyond. General comments about potential station locations 

indicated that they should serve downtown areas (although one commenter suggested that they 

be placed on the outskirts of cities where more land is available), that there should be a central 

rail hub, and that rail should serve only large cities and college towns. 

Another theme in the comments was connecting rail to south Texas, with a number of 

commenters noting that passenger rail is not currently available in this area. Frequently 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-5 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

mentioned towns and regions in this area included Laredo, Corpus Christi, Brownsville/South 

Padre Island, the South Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, and Harlingen. Several commenters also 

mentioned the benefit of rail service continuing south to Mexico. 

Other locations mentioned as potential rail connections were Austin, San Marcos, El Paso, 

College Station, Krum/Denton, Temple, and Ardmore. 

3.1.6 Alternatives/Routes 

Another common method commenters used to express their preference for rail connections was 

to indicate pairs of cities or overall routes that they would like to see served by rail. Numerous 

commenters mentioned routes that are subsets of the San Antonio to Dallas and Fort Worth 

corridor and several within the Dallas and Fort Worth to Oklahoma City corridor (and north). 

There were also several comments that requested rail connections between east and west Texas 

and cities beyond, including Los Angeles, Denver, New Orleans, Alabama, Georgia, and 

Washington D.C. Several commenters noted that overall north-south or east-west rail corridors 

should pass through the DFW Airport. 

In addition to mentioning specific routes and station locations, a number of people commented 

on operational improvements, including improving the frequency, speed, and reliability of 

service. Some comments specifically mentioned improving speed between specific city pairs, 

such as Dallas and Fort Worth and San Antonio (some commenters indicated a preference for 

true high-speed rail in this corridor), San Antonio and Austin, or the entire Program corridor 

from south Texas to Oklahoma City. 

3.2 Environmental Concerns 

During the scoping period, a number of comments were received regarding environmental issues 

and concerns. These topics included agriculture, air quality, energy, growth, health, local and 

regional economy, natural environment, noise, and right-of-way. The following summarizes the 

comments received regarding these environmental concerns. 

3.2.1 Agriculture 

Impacts on farmland and agricultural activities were raised as the primary concern. Passenger rail 

service was identified as devastating and destructive to agricultural land and activity with the 

loss of prime farmland and productive and viable farmland. Comments included concern that 

new track would cause agricultural impacts, such concern that rail would divide farmland, 

permanently affect and take farmland out of production, cause challenges and obstacles 

associated with moving large farming equipment and animals around property divided by a rail 

corridor. Comments expressed the need for and importance of preserving existing farmland and 

agriculture. Comments also identified Blackland Prairie soils and eco-region as the most 

productive farmland in Texas, as well as the need to avoid impacts on this land and associated 

farming operations; activities needed to protect this land were also mentioned. Additional 

comments requested the use of existing right-of-way and corridors to minimize or avoid impacts 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-6 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

on agriculture. One comment also identified the problem of keeping feral hogs off the right-ofway.

Although major concerns were raised about impacts on agriculture, there were a few comments 

indicating that agriculture could be promoted with passenger rail. This benefit could result from 

passengers having a view of active farms and agricultural lands and people becoming connected 

to other cities and towns to enjoy local produce and other foods at neighborhood restaurants. 

3.2.2 Air Quality 

Air quality was a major concern identified during the scoping period. A number of people 

expressed support for passenger rail service as a way to improve air quality and to reduce 

emissions, vehicle traffic, and air travel. Many people indicated that air quality would be 

improved if vehicle congestion and driving were reduced and that the Study would help provide 

a solution to the existing congestion. Other comments suggested the use of alternative energy 

sources for passenger rail service to further improve air quality. 

3.2.3 Energy 

Energy efficiency was recognized as a benefit of passenger rail service. Many people believe 

passenger rail service is more efficient, requires less energy than planes or cars, and reduces 

gas/fuel consumption by reducing the number of cars on the road. Additional comments 

requested that the latest technology and efficient power sources be used for the passenger rail 

service. 

3.2.4 Growth 

Several comments stated that passenger rail service would help grow/expand cities and regions 

as well as support anticipated growth and demand for services and transportation systems. 

Laredo and Waco were identified as cities with both growth potential and a current growth trend. 

South Texas and the Rio Grande Valley were identified as important regions that are 

experiencing growth and have potential to expand further. Growth was also recognized for areas 

outside of Texas—specifically, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Mexico were identified in the 

comments—and passenger rail was noted as a method to support this anticipated growth and the 

desire for growth. A few comments indicated that passenger rail service would help improve the 

livability of communities. 

3.2.5 Health 

A number of comments expressed support for passenger rail service as a healthy transportation 

option and indicated that air pollution levels are critical and need to be reduced. Many comments 

indicated that passenger rail service would decrease vehicle congestion and reduce air pollution 

levels to create a healthier environment and provide a positive impact on cardiovascular and 

respiratory health. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-7 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

3.2.6 Local and Regional Economy 

Many comments cited positive impacts from an improved and expanded passenger rail system on 

the local and regional economy and job growth. There is strong support for passenger rail service 

and the direct connection to stimulating the economy with new jobs and increased job 

opportunities. A number of comments mentioned the strengthening and revitalization of the 

economy through the development and operation of passenger rail service. 

Comments also stated that tourism would be promoted and encouraged with the use of passenger 

rail service and that it would ultimately bring money into the local and regional economies. 

Additional comments mentioned the opportunity to bring people to smaller rural towns and the 

ability to visit areas outside of large metropolitan areas. Passenger rail service was also identified 

as an affordable and fast travel option to colleges and universities, particularly to attend sporting 

events. 

Passenger rail service was identified as an economical way to travel, especially for those who 

cannot afford to fly or do not have access to airports or cars, which include primarily five 

categories of individuals: elderly, disabled, fixed income, low income, and veterans. Some 

comments also requested that the passenger rail service be competitive in pricing compared to 

driving, flying, and taking the bus so that it would be more affordable to people in those groups. 

Several comments stated that passenger rail service would encourage cities to build mass transit 

systems. There were also comments recognizing that local economies may be stimulated with the 

development of rail stations. A number of comments noted that rail would provide efficiency and 

productive opportunities for businesses to be connected to different cities and regions through 

rail, as well as the ability to work while riding on the train. Additional comments identified the 

enhancement of trade and commerce along the IH-35 corridor that would be associated with the 

development of rail. 

3.2.7 Natural Environment 

Most of the comments regarding the natural environment identified passenger rail service as the 

most efficient way and cleanest way to move a large number of people, and that is less intrusive 

than vehicle travel and highways. Rail is viewed as a transportation mode with minimal impact 

on open space, vegetation habitat, and waterways, whereas highways and vehicle emissions 

contribute to the loss of trees and habitat. Although many comments referred to the benefits of 

rail on the natural environment, some expressed concern about the loss, disruption, and 

displacement of the natural landscape and wildlife and impacts on water caused by erosion and 

runoff. 

Some comments requested the ability to provide for wildlife movement corridors along the rail 

corridor to prevent fragmenting and isolating wildlife and habitat. Concerns and requests to 

avoid impacts on parks, preserves, open space, eco-regions, and refuges were also received. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-8 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

3.2.8 Noise 

Comments about noise were mixed, with some stating that noise would be generated by trains 

and others stating that rail could reduce overall noise levels. In some comments, train horns and 

rail lines were identified as sources of noise, while in others trains were not anticipated to 

contribute to the existing noise levels in metropolitan areas and instead were believed to produce 

minimal noise. There was concern that noise from trains could disrupt farming activities and 

affect cattle, horses, deer, birds, etc. Comments also included requests to minimize the noise 

generated at night and to include “quiet zones.” 

3.2.9 Right-of-Way 

Many comments requested that the Study use existing right-of-way and rail easements, including 

but not limited to the UPRR corridor and IH-35 corridor, as well as existing utility corridors 

(e.g., pipelines, power lines, transmission lines) and existing stations. Some comments indicated 

that there is plenty of existing right-of-way to accommodate passenger rail, that obtaining and 

acquiring new right-of-way should be the last option, and that the rail corridor should be located 

parallel to existing right-of-way. Additional comments stated that requiring rail right-of-way 

would be no different than needing additional right-of-way for more highway lanes or toll roads. 

It was also requested that the Blackland eco-region east of IH-35 be avoided and that the 

passenger rail corridor be located west of IH-35. 

3.3 Technical/Engineering Concerns 

This section summarizes public comments received pertaining to technical and engineering 

concerns for the Program. These topics include ridership, planning, freight, safety, and 

technology. 

3.3.1 Ridership 

Several people pointed out the importance of correctly projecting ridership to the success of 

implementing improved passenger rail and requested that a thorough demand/ridership analysis 

be completed as part of the Study. A few commenters noted that increased speed and frequency 

would increase ridership. Some commenters expressed concern that ridership would be low on 

new passenger rail service. 

3.3.2 Planning 

Some people expressed an interest in ensuring that existing transportation plans are incorporated 

into the Study. Specifically mentioned were the Association of Central Oklahoma Governments 

commuter rail study, including the Oklahoma City to Norman BNSF corridor and the planned 

Shreveport to Dallas/Fort Worth rail link. Commenters also mentioned the benefit of expediting 

this Study to save money and avoid outdated conclusions. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-9 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

3.3.3 Freight 

Several commenters mentioned concerns or ideas related to potential impacts on freight rail that 

could be caused by introducing additional passenger rail service. Comments included reasonably 

compensating freight lines used by passenger rail and double tracking to avoid conflicts between 

freight and passenger rail. Other comments recommended that money be spent on improving 

freight rail instead of passenger rail and that freight rail should be improved to get trucks off the 

road. One commenter suggested that a terminal be provided to accommodate loading freight 

from trucks onto trains. 

3.3.4 Safety 

Most of the comments regarding safety indicated that rail is an efficient form of transportation 

and would make the roads safer and cleaner and would lead to fewer cars on the road, resulting 

in fewer accidents and fatalities. IH-35 and IH-10 were identified as congested and dangerous 

highway corridors. Many comments expressed how the Project would alleviate much of the 

heavy traffic and congestion. In addition, a number of comments stated that rail provides a safer 

and more comfortable alternative than vehicle travel, especially for the elderly and when 

traveling alone or at night. 

At-grade crossings were considered to be dangerous and were the primary safety concern 

expressed in a number of comments. According to some of these comments, crossings should be 

minimized, if not eliminated, and adequate warning should be secured or the associated signaling 

should be improved. Grade-separated crossings were requested. Comments also included the 

need to evaluate the safety of crossings and to create safe crossings, especially in key locations 

such as IH 37. Additional concerns regarding crossings included required wait times for at-grade 

crossings and the speed of trains at these crossings. 

Some specific safety-related uses of improved passenger rail were mentioned. These included 

aiding in evacuations in the event of a natural disaster and, specifically, expediting the safe 

evacuation of elderly persons and persons with disabilities from south Texas in the event of an 

approaching hurricane. Another commenter suggested that faster trains could be used to connect 

people to medical services and that ambulance facilities could be included on trains. 

Another safety concern related to the potential for illegal immigration and drug trafficking on 

passenger trains. 

3.3.5 Technology 

General comments about the desired approach to providing passenger rail improvements were 

almost evenly divided: roughly the same number of people requesting incremental improvements 

as those urging that true high-speed rail be built instead of incremental improvements. 

Several suggestions were made about the technology that should be used for new passenger rail 

service. These included general comments such as using the best quality materials and planning 

for maintenance, using state-of-the-art equipment for high-speed rail alternatives, and making 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-10 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

trains as fast as possible. Other commenters suggested specific technologies such as maglev and 

solar-powered trains. Some comments made suggestions about alignment locations, like putting 

elevated trains in highway medians, using existing rail lines, and building dedicated tracks for 

high-speed rail. 

A number of commenters made suggestions about using specific existing rail lines for expanded 

passenger rail service. These included incorporating the Trinity Railway Express (TRE), 

connecting the Southwest Chief and Texas Eagle, providing higher speeds and express service 

along Texas Eagle Routes, improving frequency of Heartland Flyer service, and placing highspeed rail in the abandoned Southern Pacific right-of-way. One commenter suggested that 

special attention be given to upgrading existing rail infrastructure in the San Antonio-HoustonDallas and Fort Worth “triangle.” 

3.4 Elected Officials, Agencies, and Tribal Responses to NOI 

Agency representatives attended three agency scoping meetings held on March 25, March 27, 

and April 3, 2013, and prepared letters in response to the NOI. Elected officials also submitted 

letters in response to the NOI. This section summarizes the comments received from agencies, 

elected officials, and federally recognized tribes in response to the NOI and/or provided at one of 

the agency scoping meetings. This section is subdivided into elected officials, federal agencies, 

state agencies, regional agencies, and local agencies. Agency and elected official comments are 

reproduced in Appendix E and comments from tribes are reproduced in Appendix F. 

3.4.1 Elected Officials 

3.4.1.1 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth 

3.4.1.1.1 City of Ardmore 

The vice mayor for the city of Ardmore, Sheryl Ellis, provided comments at the public open 

house in Ardmore on March 26, 2013. Vice Mayor Ellis expressed support for passenger rail 

service. The availability to have connections to other areas was recognized as critical for 

work/business, leisure, and general travel for the city of Ardmore and the region. Passenger rail 

service was identified as a solution to relieve and decrease interstate traffic congestion and 

promote growth and construction of additional infrastructure. Noise from train horns was noted 

as a concern. Vice Mayor Ellis also supported a passenger rail stop in Ardmore. 

3.4.1.2 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio 

No elected official from the Central Section provided comments during the scoping period. 

3.4.1.3 Southern Section: San Antonio to South Texas 

No elected official from the Southern Section provided comments during the scoping period. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-11 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

3.4.1.4 Others 

3.4.1.4.1 Kansas State House of Representatives, Representative Pete DeGraaf, 

District 82 

Representative Pete DeGraaf strongly supports expanding intercity passenger rail along the IH35 corridor in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas. He also supports expanding the Heartland Flyer 

services north from Oklahoma City into Wichita, Kan. An expanded passenger rail service 

through these states would benefit the region by improving mobility for business and leisure 

travelers. Representative DeGraaf also supports expansion of existing rail from Newton, Kan., to 

Houston, Texas to allow the Heartland Flyer to connect with the existing passenger rail service 

provided by the Southwest Chief. This would allow for an east-west connection to the Missouri 

and Colorado region. Mr. DeGraaf encourages the Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas to work 

together to develop an interconnected passenger rail system that includes bringing the Heartland 

Flyer north through Guthrie, Ponca City, Mulvane, Wichita, Newton, and Kansas City. 

3.4.1.4.2 City of Wichita, Kan., Vice Mayor Pete Meitzner 

The vice mayor supports the connection of the Heartland Flyer from Oklahoma City to Wichita 

to the north and then connection with the Southwest Chief in Newton. Mr. Meitzner would also 

support a day route between Fort Worth and Kansas City. The city of Wichita and the Kansas 

Department of Transportation support the extension of the current service and believe this would 

secure IH-35 as a major transportation and trade route for the three states. 

3.4.2 Federal 

3.4.2.1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency provided recommendations for continued 

interagency and community coordination and recommendations, information sources, and 

guidance for various actions and analyses such as: 

 Using of the Regional Ecological Assessment Protocol methodology, a product of the Texas 

Environmental Resource Stewards effort, which uses broad-scale electronic data to identify 

important ecological areas in Texas. 

 Analyzing impacts on water resources, cultural and historic resources, biological resources 

and wildlife (including wildlife movement impacts), noise and vibration (on residents and 

wildlife), energy resources, air quality (including greenhouse gases and climate change), 

environmental justice communities, and invasive species. 

 Addressing Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) properties within or near Program corridors. 

 Requiring Study-specific locations to be identified as direct impacts and to avoid 

environmentally sensitive areas. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-12 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 Consulting with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Texas Parks and Wildlife 

Department (TPWD), and the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation to make sure 

that current and consistent surveying, monitoring, and reporting protocols are applied in 

protection and mitigation efforts. 

 Assessing cumulative impacts 

 Assessing growth inducement 

 Implementing government-to-government consultation between FRA and tribal governments 

 Addressing how the proposed action would support or conflict with land use plans (federal, 

state, tribal, or land use plans, policies, and controls in the study areas) 

3.4.2.2 U.S. Border Patrol 

The U.S. Border Patrol, Laredo Sector, is interested in intercity passenger rail service as an 

alternative mode of transportation for its employees. The U.S. Border Patrol participates in the 

Public Transportation Incentive Program and views rail as a viable option to include in its 

program. There are several employees in the Border Patrol/Laredo Sector assigned throughout 

several areas (Laredo, Cotulla, Hebbronville, Freer, Zapata) who currently reside outside of their 

duty station and commute every day. The director of security, policy, and compliance with the 

Laredo Sector requested additional information on the proposed routes, station locations, hours 

of operation, and fares. 

3.4.3 Tribal Coordination 

The Delaware Nation submitted a response letter to FRA and expressed interest in the study and 

study area and confirmed they will be a consulting party. Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma 

requested additional information to more thoroughly evaluate their area of interest in relation to 

this program for National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 review. 

3.4.4 State 

3.4.4.1 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 

TPWD provided recommendations to maintain the proposed rail alignments within existing 

railroad right-of-way whenever possible. If new alignment corridors are required, TPWD 

recommends constructing the passenger rail along existing roads or major utility corridors to 

reduce habitat fragmentation. TPWD expressed concern about potential impacts on natural 

resources that could occur with the proposed Program and recommended early agency 

consultation at key milestones. They identified potential crossings of the Texas Conservation 

Action Plan’s eco-regions of Texas. These included Cross Timbers, Southern Texas Plains, East 

Central Texas Plains, Texas Blackland Prairies, Edwards Plateau, and Western Gulf Coastal 

Plain. Eco-regions in proximity to IH 35 were identified on a map. Input was provided at a 

coarse scale because the Program study area is still general and broad-based. TPWD requested 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-13 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

ongoing communication with the Program team during the early planning phase of the Study to 

provide guidance in the avoidance and minimization of impacts on natural resources. 

TPWD provided general guidance on avoidance and minimization of impacts on natural 

resources, including native grasslands/rangelands; riparian corridors including major rivers and 

tributaries; aquatic resources (freshwater mussels/designated mussel sanctuaries, fish, etc); 

TPWD-managed and non-managed areas; Species of Greatest Conservation Need habitat; 

species on the USFWS county lists; and fragmentation of wildlife travel corridors. Additional 

habitats of concern include whooping crane stopover habitat, USFWS-designated critical habitat, 

and Colonial Waterbird Rookeries. 

TPWD outlined the required procedures to address direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts that 

could adversely affect natural resources. They included recommendations for station 

landscaping, bridge design to maintain streams, characteristics and aquatic and terrestrial 

movement, use of best management practices during construction to minimize wetland impacts, 

use of wildlife crossings, and compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. 

TPWD informed TxDOT and FRA that the taking of any TPWD lands, such as state parks and 

wildlife management areas would require an easement or transfer of property authorized by the 

TPWD commission. This can be a time-intensive effort and requires compensatory mitigation. 

Coordination with the Grants-in-Aid Branch of TPWD and local park administrators would be 

necessary to prevent conversion of grant-assisted lands to other than public outdoor recreation 

use, as prohibited by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act. 

TPWD listed the applicable state and federal regulations that would pertain to Program, 

including federal regulations (Migratory Bird Treaty Act), Section 6(f) of the Land and Water 

Conservation Act, Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, Endangered Species 

Act, Clean Water Act, and U.S. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. 

Applicable state regulations include Chapter 86 of the Parks and Wildlife Code (state-owned 

streambeds); Chapter 26 of Parks and Wildlife Code (Managed Areas); Section 68.015 of the 

Parks and Wildlife Code (regulates state-listed species); Sections 12.015, 12.019, and 66.015 of 

the Parks and Wildlife Code and Texas Administrative Code 57.251-259 (regulates the 

introduction and stocking of fish, shellfish, and aquatic plants into public waters of the state). 

Finally, TPWD provided general guidance and information sources regarding analysis of impacts 

on species and habitat (by eco-region) and encouraged close coordination with TPWD once the 

study area boundaries have been established. 

3.4.4.2 Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department 

The Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department expressed concerns regarding current 

passenger service not meeting the needs of travelers to Oklahoma and Texas and emphasized 

improving this service as well as the importance of identifying and providing service to major 

and critical destinations for travelers. Connectivity and station amenities and services should be 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-14 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

supportive of all passengers and were identified as priorities. Passenger rail service and 

associated stations were viewed as supporting and promoting livable communities. 

3.4.5 Regional 

3.4.5.1 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth 

3.4.5.1.1 City of Arlington 

The city of Arlington expressed support for the Study and recommended that the alignment be 

placed as close as possible to the central portion of the north Texas region. Arlington 

recommended that the stations be placed in the urban centers of cities and towns instead on the 

outskirts of the region. By placing the stations and the alignment in centrally located regions, 

ridership and rail service would be improved. Potential impacts on the Arlington region should 

be addressed as necessary based on the placement of the alignment and stations. 

3.4.5.2 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio 

No agency comments specific to the Central Section were received during the scoping period. 

3.4.5.3 Southern Section: San Antonio to South Texas 

3.4.5.3.1 City of Brownsville 

The City Commission of the city of Brownsville established a resolution (Resolution No. 2013-

027) to endorse the Study and extending intercity passenger rail service to the city of 

Brownsville. They stated the need to provide intercity rail service between San Antonio and 

Brownsville to provide travelers better modes of transportation, including residents of the Lower 

Rio Grande Valley. The Study would promote the general welfare and economic development of 

the Brownsville urbanized area, as well as provide a safe mode of transportation during 

emergency evacuations of the elderly and handicapped in the event of a hurricane. The resolution 

indicates that the intercity passenger rail would benefit from the economic development 

opportunities that would arise with increased tourism in the area. 

3.4.5.3.2 City of Laredo 

The city manager stated his support of the Program and his preference to include alternative 

routes that include the city of Laredo. He indicated that the city is the home of the largest and 

most efficient inland port of entry on the U.S.-Mexico border. In 2012, Laredo handled 3.5 

million cross-border truck crossings, which averages approximately 9,842 truck crossings per 

day. The port also handled in excess of 8.7 million passenger vehicle crossings per day. The total 

number of vehicles that crossed through the bridge system in 2012 was more than 12 million. 

There are more than 830 trade-handling and transportation-related businesses in Laredo, in Webb 

County, Texas. Trade numbers provided by the city showed that Laredo is ranked sixth among 

all ports in the United States and was the only one to have double-digit growth. International 

trade and commerce were recognized at the state, national, and international level. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-15 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

The city manager also indicated that offering high-speed passenger rail in the Laredo and U.S.-

Mexico border region would further promote and stimulate trade and tourism with Mexico. It 

would also provide a safe, convenient, and comfortable mode of travel. He stated that Laredo 

currently does not have air service to San Antonio or Austin and providing intercity passenger 

rail service to this southern region of the state would meet a transportation need. It would also 

improve mobility between Nuevo Laredo and Monterrey, Mexico, enhancing international trade 

and commerce between the United States, Mexico, and regions to the south. 

3.4.5.3.3 City of South Padre Island 

The city of South Padre Island expressed support for the extension of intercity passenger rail 

through the Lower Rio Grande Valley given the major populations centers in this region and the 

large vehicular border crossings in the Brownsville/U.S.-Mexico border area. The city stated 

that, based on 2010 census data, the population in the Lower Rio Grande Valley is 430,000 for 

the Brownsville-Harlingen Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and 800,000 for the Hidalgo 

County MSA, which is three times greater than the population of Laredo and should be taken 

into consideration when selecting alternative corridors to study. Border crossings for personal 

vehicle passengers were estimated by the city at 21.8 million in comparison to Laredo border 

crossings for vehicles, which is estimated at 8.7 million passenger vehicle crossings per day. 

Given the existing and projected population, the city of South Padre Island expressed strong 

support for including intercity passenger rail service in the Lower Rio Grande Valley. 

The city stated that the Lower Rio Grande Valley has three major airports that could serve as 

hubs/multimodal transfer centers, drawing on a greater population to use high-speed passenger 

rail service going north. This should be considered when determining the southern terminus. The 

Lower Rio Grande Valley, and South Padre Island in particular, have multiple tourist 

destinations that could be served by high-speed passenger rail service and multimodal 

connections. This should be considered when determining the southern terminus of service. 

3.4.5.3.4 Brownsville Metropolitan Planning Organization 

The Brownsville MPO provided the Program team a purpose and need statement as an 

attachment to its scoping letter. The purpose and need objectives were specific to Brownsville, 

Los Fresnos, Rancho Viejo, Port Isabel, and South Padre Island. The attachment indicated the 

following for development of rail service in this region: 

 The existing UPRR corridor should be used to minimize costs associated with establishing a 

new corridor. 

 Cameron County (specifically South Padre Island) is a premier tourist destination for Texans, 

as well as national and international tourists. Providing rail service to and from Port Isabel to 

South Padre Island would decrease roadway congestion. 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-16 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

 The Lower Rio Grande Valley is one of the fastest growing areas in the U.S. This growth in 

population would be well served with the development of intercity rail service to meet future 

travel demands. 

 The Brownsville/South Padre Island International Airport has plans to extend its main 

runway. With continued growth of enplanements from Mexican flights, it makes sense to 

include rail service at this location to provide travelers an alternative mode of transportation 

when traveling to areas north of the Brownsville area. 

 Residents of Cameron County would benefit economically from the creation of intercity 

passenger rail service because of job growth and increased tourism. 

 Intercity passenger rail service to Brownsville would decrease congestion on U.S. 77, which 

is designated as a future connector to IH-69. 

The Brownsville MPO indicated that providing passenger rail service in this region would 

expedite the safe evacuation of elderly persons and persons with disabilities from south Texas in 

the event of an approaching hurricane. Providing passenger rail service as an alternative to 

vehicles during emergency evacuation events would serve the public interest and promote health 

and the general welfare of the public. 

3.4.6 Organizations 

3.4.6.1 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth 

No comments from organizations specific to the Northern Section were received during the 

scoping period. 

3.4.6.2 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio 

3.4.6.2.1 Greater Waco Chamber of Commerce 

The Greater Waco Chamber of Commerce expressed support of passenger rail service and 

emphasized the need to connect and include a stop in the city of Waco. Economic growth was 

acknowledged as important and diverse within the city of Waco. IH-35 was recognized as a 

heavily congested corridor, and the chamber indicted that passenger rail service would help 

alleviate this congestion, improve the efficiency of the movement of people and goods, create a 

safe environment, and improve environmental quality. 

3.4.6.3 Southern Section: San Antonio to South Texas 

3.4.6.3.1 Brownsville Chamber of Commerce 

The Brownsville Chamber of Commerce stated its support for using the existing UPRR corridor 

to provide passenger rail service and to help reduce roadway congestion and connect to other 

regions while promoting South Padre Island and the Lower Rio Grande Valley, which was 

identified as one of the fastest growing areas in the United States. The chamber stated that 
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 3-17 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

population growth in the Lower Rio Grande Valley requires the development of passenger rail 

for accommodating future travel demand needs, which would also promote the general welfare 

and economic development in the area. Passenger rail service was also recognized as an 

affordable travel option and an effective method of transportation for the elderly and disabled. 

3.5 Summary Comment Tables 

Tables 3-1 through Table 3-4 summarize the comments submitted during the scoping process. 

Within each table, the comments are organized by type of commenter (agency, organization, or 

individuals) and are generally listed alphabetically by commenter. Tables 3-1a through 3-1f 

provide comments from elected officials and agencies (respectively U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, International Boundary and Water Commission, state agencies outside 

Texas, state agencies in Texas, MPOs, and regional and local government agencies. Table 3-2 

provides comments from tribes. Table 3-3a and 3-3b provide comments from organizations and 

businesses, respectively. Table 3.4 provides comments from individuals. All tables reproduce the 

verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and then categorized by topic 

area. 

 

in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 3-1a: Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies (United Sta

Environmental Protection Agency)a

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency Griffin Debra The Region 6 office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the 

March 13, 2013 Notice of Intent) (NOI) to Prepare an EIS for the Texas Oklahoma PassenRail Study Corridor, South Texas to Oklahoma City. Our comments are provided pursuanthe National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Council on Environmental Quality (CEQregulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508) and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. To assist in tscoping process for this project, we have identified several issues for your attention in the preparation of the EIS and enclosed detailed scoping comments for your consideration. EPis most concerned about the following issues: alternatives development, impacts to water abiological resources, invasive species management, habitat protection, air quality, indirect and cumulative impacts, climate change, environmental justice, and mitigation. EPA appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comments on the proposed project. Pleasend one hard copy of the draft EIS and four CDs to this office when completed and submitted for public comment. When you are ready to file the draft EIS with EPA, you ma

now electronically file it by using our e-NEPA Electronic Filing website http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/submiteis/index.html. If you have any questions or 

concerns, please contact Rhonda Smith at 214-665-8126 or John MacFarlane of my staff a214-665-7491 or macfarlane.john@epa.govforassistance. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency Griffin Debra Proposed Project In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA), as amended, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) intends to prepare a 

Service Level/Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) with the Texas Department o

Transportation and the Oklahoma Department of Transportation, to analyze the impacts of proposed new and/or improved high-speed intercity passenger rail service along an 850-mcorridor extending from Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to the south Texas cities of Laredo anBrownsville. This EIS will be used by the FRA in its decision making process to determinwhether the project is in the public interest. The FRA will serve as the lead Federal agency under the NEPA process and is responsible for the preparation of the EIS. General EPA suggests utilizing the Regional Ecological Assessment Protocol (REAP) methodology to determine ecologically sensitive areas within the proposed project area that should be avoided or protected. REAP is a product of the Texas Environmental Resource Stewards (TERS) effort which analyzes existing broad-scale electronic data to identify important ecological areas in Texas. For more information on REAP, please call John MacFarlane at 214-665-7491. 

Griffin Debra Tiering: EPA understands the FRA will use a "tiered" approach to this project. The Tier 1

Service Level, EIS will assess the broad corridor-wide impacts of a passenger rail system. The more detailed Tier 2 documentation would be required to examine the potential impacof the site-specific projects that are advanced to implement the Tier 1 alternative selected. Any Tier 2 documents should incorporate by reference the general discussions and concentrate solely on the issues specific to the statement subsequently prepared 1. Statemeof Purpose and Need The EIS should clearly identify the underlying purpose and need to which the FRA is responding in proposing the alternatives. The purpose of the proposed 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

action is typically the specific objectives of the activity, while the need for the proposed action may be to eliminate a broader underlying problem or take advantage of an opportunity. 

Griffin Debra Alternatives Analysis NEP A requires evaluation of reasonable alternatives, including tho

that may not be within the jurisdiction of the lead agency3. A robust range of alternatives will include options for avoiding significant environmental impacts. The EIS should "rigorously explore and objectively evaluate all reasonable alternatives by developing a defined screening process. The screening process should rate each alternative against a set pre-determined criteria. Each alternative should then be analyzed for its level of impact on resource, e.g. no effect, negligible effect, minor effect, major effect, significant effect. Onlthat alternative that effectively meets or best meets all of the screening criteria should be recommended as the preferred alternative. The EIS should provide a clear discussion of threasons for the elimination of alternatives which are not evaluated in detail. Section IS02.l4(d) requires the alternatives analysis to "include the alternative of no action." No Action means the proposed activity would not take place, and the resulting environmental effects from taking no action would be compared with the effects of permitting the proposactivity or an alternative activity to go forward. 

Griffin Debra Affected Environment 

This section should provide information on the existing resources and condition of the natural and built environment. It is a description of baseline conditions. These baseline conditions provide the context for evaluating environmental consequences and should 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

include historical cumulative effects to the extent feasible. Environmental Consequences A majority of EISs contain a well-written section on the affected or existing environment. However, where most EISs fall short is the discussion of the environmental consequences the proposed project. An analysis should follow an equation. First, what is the action? In texample, the action is filling wetlands. Second, what is the intensity or extent of impacts? this example, the extent of proposed impacts is five acres. Third, is that significant? The Emust answer that question and prove that the action of filling five acres of wetlands is not significant by discussing rationale. Lf the action is significant, then the EIS must contain appropriate mitigation measures. 

Griffin Debra Water Resources Water Supply and Water Quality Public drinking water supplies and/or 

their source areas often exist in many watersheds. Source water is water from streams, rivelakes, springs, and aquifers that is used as a supply of drinking water. Source water areas adelineated and mapped by the state for each federally regulated public water system. The 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act require federal agencies to protect sourof drinking water for communities. The EIS should address the potential effects of project discharges, if any, on surface water quality. Specific discharges should be identified and 

potential effects of discharges on designated beneficial uses of affected waters should be analyzed. 

Griffin Debra Stormwater The EIS should describe the original (natural) drainage patterns in the project 

locale, as well as the drainage patterns of the area during project operations. Also, the EIS 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

should identify whether any components of the proposed project are within a 50 or 100-yefloodplain. The EIS should note that, under the Clean Water Act (CWA), any construction project disturbing a land area of one or more acres requires a construction stormwater discharge permit. 

Griffin Debra Waters of the United States, including Wetlands The project applicant should coordinate w

the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine if the proposed project requires Section 404 permit under the CW A. Section 404 regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands and other special aquatic siteThe EPA recommends the FRA include a jurisdictional delineation for all waters of the U

including ephemeral drainages, in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the December 2006 Region Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. A jurisdictional delineation will confirm the presence or absence of waters of the U.S. in the project area and help determine whethor not the proposed project would require a Section 404 permit. If a permit is required, the EPA will review the project for compliance with Federal Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Materials (40 CFR 230), promulgated pursuant to Secti404(b)(1) of the CW A. EPA encourages on-going coordination with the USACE during tplanning, scoping, and construction phases. The EIS should demonstrate planning efforts tavoid, minimize, and compensate for wetland losses associated with the dredging, dredged material disposal, and other construction and operation activities. The EIS should also include an analysis of the potential for contaminated sediments to adversely impact the aquatic environment during construction and operation of the terminal. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency Griffin Debra Impaired Waters The CWA requires States to develop a list of impaired waters that do not 

meet water quality standards, establish priority rankings, and develop action plans, called Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL), to improve water quality. The EIS should provide information on CWA Section 303(d) impaired waters in the project area, if any, and effortdevelop and revise TMDLs. The EIS should describe existing restoration and enhancemenefforts for those waters, and any mitigation measures that will be implemented to avoid further degradation of impaired waters. 

Griffin Debra Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) - Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 196

includes a special provision that protects publicly owned parks, recreational areas, wildlife 

and waterfowl refuges, or public and private historical sites from being acquired for transportation projects. Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (L WC

states that either the land or park appurtenances acquired with L WCF funds cannot be 

eliminated or acquired without coordination with the National Park Service and mitigation that replaces the eliminated items. If any 4(f) or 6(f) properties are within or near project corridors, they should be documented. A more thorough evaluation of potential impacts, alternatives, and mitigation should be included in appropriate Tier 2 documentation. Pleas

be aware that vibration and noise can also adversely impact 4(f) and 6(f) properties. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency Griffin Debra Project Specific Locations (PSL) - PSLs outside the right-of-way that would be establishe

support construction of the roadway such as borrow and disposal sites, staging and storage areas, and concrete and aggregate plants, must be identified as direct impacts. The project team should strive to locate PSLs so they avoid environmentally sensitive areas. Ideally, PSLs should be located in previously disturbed, upland areas. 

Griffin Debra Biological Resources. Habitat. and Wildlife - The EIS should identify all petitioned and 

listed threatened and endangered species and critical habitat that might occur within the 

project area. The EIS should identify and quantify which species or critical habitat might bdirectly, indirectly, or cumulatively affected by each alternative and mitigate impacts to thspecies. EPA recommends that the FRA consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, tTexas Parks and Wildlife Department, and the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation to ensure that current and consistent surveying, monitoring, and reporting protocols are applied in protection and mitigation efforts. 

Griffin Debra Invasive Species - Executive Order 13112, Invasive Species (February 3, 1999), mandates 

that federal agencies take actions to prevent the introduction of invasive species, provide ftheir control, and minimize the economic, ecological, and human health impacts that invasspecies cause. Executive Order 13112 also calls for the restoration of native plants and trespecies. If the proposed project will entail new landscaping, the EIS should describe how tproject will meet the requirements of Executive Order 13112. In addition, we encourage alternative management practices that limit herbicide use (as a last resort), focusing insteaon other methods to limit invasive species vegetation and decrease fire risk. Possible alternatives include mowing and weed control fabric, which may need a layer of soil to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

prevent degradation due to ultraviolet light. 

Griffin Debra Air Quality - The EIS should provide a detailed discussion of ambient air conditions 

(baseline or existing conditions), National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and non-NAAQS pollutants, criteria pollutant nonattainment areas, and potential air quality impacts of the proposed project (including cumulative and indirect impacts). Such an evaluation is necessary to understand the potential impacts from temporary, long-term, or cumulative degradation of air quality. 

Griffin Debra The EIS should describe and estimate air emissions from potential construction and 

maintenance activities, as well as proposed mitigation measures to minimize those emissioEPA recommends an evaluation of the following measures to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants and hazardous air pollutants (air toxics). 

Griffin Debra Existing Conditions -The EIS should provide a detailed discussion of ambient air conditio

National Ambient Air Quality Standards, and criteria pollutant nonattainment areas in the vicinity of the project. 

Griffin Debra Quantify Emissions -The EIS should estimate emissions of criteria and hazardous air 

pollutants (air toxics) from the proposed project and discuss the timeframe for release of these emissions over the lifespan of the project. The EIS should describe and estimate emissions from potential construction activities, as well as proposed mitigation measures t

minimize these emissions. • Provide a comparison of proposed project emissions of nitrogoxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VQCs) with the general conformity de 

minimis levels (40 CFR 93.153) for the Dallas/Fort Worth 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

moderate nonattainment area (100 tons/year NOx, 100 tons/year VQCs) to determine the 

applicability of general conformity to this project. 

Griffin Debra Specify Emission Sources -The EIS should specify all emission sources by pollutant from 

mobile sources (on and off-road), stationary sources (including portable and temporary emission units), fugitive emission sources, area sources, and ground disturbance. This souspecific information should be used to identify appropriate mitigation measures and areas need of the greatest attention. • Clearly identify in the EIS any construction phases/other aspects of project alternatives tmay already be accounted for in existing Transportation Improvement Program MetropoliTransportation Plan for the Dallas Fort Worth 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS moderate nonattainment area. 

Griffin Debra Construction Emissions Mitigation Plan -The EIS should include a draft Construction 

Emissions Mitigation Plan and ultimately adopt this plan in the Record of Decision. In addition to all applicable local, state, or federal requirements, we recommend the followincontrol measures (Fugitive Dust, Mobile and Stationary Source and Administrative) be included in the Construction Emissions Mitigation Plan in order to 

Griffin Debra reduce impacts associated with emissions of particulate matter and other toxics from 

construction-related activities: • Fugitive Dust Source Controls: The EIS should identify the need for a Fugitive Dust Control Plan to reduce Particulate Matter 10 and Fine Particulate Matter 2.5 emissions dur
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

construction and operations. We recommend that the plan include these general commitments: • Stabilize heavily used unpaved construction roads with a non-toxic soil stabilizer or soil weighting agent that will not result in loss of vegetation, or increase other environmental impacts. • During grading, use water, as necessary, on disturbed areas in construction sites to controvisible plumes. • Vehicle speed - Limit speeds to 25 miles per hour on stabilized unpaved roads as long as such speeds do not create visible dust emissions. • Limit speeds to 10 miles per hour or less on unpaved areas within construction sites on ustabilized (and unpaved) roads. • Post visible speed limit signs at construction site entrances. • Inspect and was construction equipment vehicle tires, as necessary, so they are free of dibefore entering paved roadways, if applicable. • Provide gravel ramps of at least 20 feet in length at tire washing/cleaning stations, and ensure construction vehicles exit construction sites through treated entrance roadways, unlan alternative route has been approved by appropriate lead agencies, if applicable. • Use sandbags or equivalent effective measures to prevent run-off to roadways in 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

construction areas adjacent to paved roadways. Ensure consistency with the project's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, if such a plan is required for the project. • Sweep the first 500 feet of paved roads exiting construction sites, other unpaved roads en 

route from the construction site, or construction staging areas whenever dirt or runoff from construction activity is visible on paved roads, or at least twice daily (less during periods oprecipitation). • Stabilize disturbed soils (after active construction activities are completed) with a non-tosoil stabilizer, soil weighting agent, or other approved soil stabilizing method. • Cover or treat soil storage piles with appropriate dust suppressant compounds and disturb

areas that remain inactive for longer than 10 days. Provide vehicles (used to transport solid bulk material on public roadways and that have potential to cause visible emissions) with covers. Alternatively, sufficiently wet and load materials onto the trucks in a manner to provide at least one foot of freeboard. • Use wind erosion control techniques (such as windbreaks, water, chemical dust suppressants, and/or vegetation) where soils are disturbed in construction, access and maintenance routes, and materials stock pile areas. Keep related windbreaks in place until soil is stabilized or permanently covered with vegetation. Mobile and Stationary Source Controls: • If practicable, lease new, clean equipment meeting the most stringent of applicable Fedeor State Standards. In general, commit to the best available emissions control technology. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Tier 4 engines should be used for project construction equipment to the maximum extent feasible. • Where Tier 4 engines are not available, we recommend use of EPA-verified particulate traps, oxidation catalysts and other appropriate controls where suitable to reduce emissiondiesel particulate matter and other pollutants to no more than Tier 2 levels. • Consider using electric vehicles, natural gas, biodiesel, or other alternative fuels during construction and operation phases to reduce the project's criteria and greenhouse gas emissions. • Plan construction scheduling to minimize vehicle trips. • Limit idling of heavy equipment to less than 5 minutes and verify through unscheduled inspections. • Maintain and tune engines per manufacturer's specifications to perform at EPA certificatlevels, prevent tampering, and conduct unscheduled inspections to ensure these measures 

followed. Administrative controls: • Develop construction traffic and parking management plan that maintains traffic flow anplan construction to minimize vehicle trips. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

• Identify any sensitive receptors in the project area, such as children, elderly, and the infirmed, and specify the means by which impacts to these populations will be minimized (e.g. located construction equipment and staging zones away from sensitive receptors and building air intakes). • Include provisions for monitoring fugitive dust in the fugitive dust control plan and initiaincreased mitigation measures to abate any visible dust plumes. 

Griffin Debra Climate Change - Scientific evidence supports the concern that continued increases in 

greenhouse gas emissions resulting from human activities will contribute to climate changGlobal warming is caused by emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases. ODecember 7, 2009, the EPA determined that Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) contribute to air pollution that "endangers public health and welfare" within the meaning of the Clean Air Act. Higher temperatures and increased winter rainfall will be accompanied by a reduction snow pack, earlier snowmelts, and increased runoff. Some of the impacts, such as reduced groundwater discharge, and more frequent and severe drought conditions, may impact the proposed projects. The EIS should consider how climate change could potentially influencthe proposed project, specifically within sensitive areas, and assess how the projected impacts could be exacerbated by climate change and strategies for climate change adaptatiplanning. For example, measures for climate change adaptation should consider potentiallincreased drainage needs. 

Griffin Debra Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Emissions 

On February 18, 2010, the CEQ issued draft language to Federal Agencies on analyzing th
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

effects of GHG emissions and climate change when describing the environmental effects oproposed agency action in accordance with NEPA. CEQ's draft guidance defines GHG emissions in accordance with Section 19(i) of Executive Order 13514 Federal Leadership Environment, Energy, and Economic Performance (October 5, 2009) to include carbon dioxide (C02), methane (C~), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbon (HFCs), 

perfluorocarbon (PFCs), and sulfurhexafluoride (SF 6). Because C02 is the reference gas f

climate change based on their potential to absorb heat in the atmosphere, measures of nonC02 GHGs should be reflected as CO2-equivalent (Core) values. EPA supports evaluation 

and disclosure of GHG emissions and climate change effects resulting from the proposed project during all project phases, including (1) pre-construction (e.g., transportation, mobilization, and staging), (2) construction, (3) operation, (4) maintenance, and (5) decommissioning. We recommend that the GHG emission accounting/inventory include each proposed stationary source (e.g., power plant, liquefaction facility, compressor and metering stations, etc.) and mobile emissions source (e.g., heavy equipment, supply barges, rail transports, etc.). We also recommend that the Eestablish reasonable spatial and temporal boundaries for this analysis, and that the EIS quantify and disclose the expected annual direct and indirect GHG emissions for the proposed action. In the analysis of direct effects, we recommend that the EIS quantify cumulative emissions over the life of the project, discuss measures to reduce GHG emissioincluding consideration of reasonable alternatives. EPA recommends that the EIS consider mitigation measures and reasonable alternatives to reduce action related GHG emissions, 

include a discussion of cumulative effects of GHG emissions related to the proposed actio
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency Griffin Debra Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste/Solid Waste 

The EIS should address potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of hazardous wafrom construction and operation of the proposed project. The document should identify projected hazardous waste types and volumes, and expected storage, disposal, and management plans. It should identify any hazardous materials sites within the project's stuarea and evaluate if those sites would impact the project in any way. 

Griffin Debra Coordination with Tribal Governments 

Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (November 6, 2000), was issued in order to establish regular and meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials in the development of federal policies that have tribaimplications, and to strengthen the United States government-to-government relationships with Indian tribes. If applicable, the EIS should describe the process and outcome of government-to-government consultation between the FAA and with any and each of the 

tribal governments within the project area, issues that were raised (if any), and how those issues were addressed in the selection of the proposed alternative. Because this project wilhave a portion of the proposed rail line in Oklahoma, EPA strongly recommends that the FRA initiate consultation with Tribal governments as early as possible because of the uniq

legal relationship the U.S. Government has with federally recognized tribes based on the 

Constitution, treaties, statutes, Executive Orders, and court decisions. This relationship includes recognition of the right of tribes as sovereign governments to self-determination, and an acknowledgment of the federal government's trust responsibility to tribes. The prec

nature of this relationship will vary depending upon the identity of the tribes and nature of 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

trust resources involved. 

Griffin Debra National Historic Preservation Act 

Consultation for tribal cultural resources is required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Historic properties under the NHP A are properties thaare included in the National Register of Historic Places or that meet the criteria for the National Register. Section 106 of the NHPA requires a federal agency, upon determining activities under its control could affect historic properties, consult with the appropriate StaHistoric Preservation Officer (SHPO)/Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO). Under NEPA, any impacts to tribal, cultural, or other treaty resources must be discussed and mitigated. Section 106 of the NHP A requires that Federal agencies consider the effects of their actions on cultural resources, following regulation in 36 CFR 800. The EIS should address the existence of cultural and historic resources, including Indian sacred sites, in the project areas, and address compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA. Ishould also address Executive Order 13007, distinguish it from Section 106 of the NHPA, and discuss how the FRA will avoid adversely affecting the physical integrity, accessibilitor use of sacred sites, if they exist. The EIS should provide a summary of all coordination with Tribes and with the SHPO/THPO, including identification of NRHP eligible sites, an

development of a Cultural Resource Management Plan. 

Griffin Debra Environmental Justice and Impacted Communities 

Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Populations and Low-Income Populations (February 11, 1994) and the Interagency Memorandum of Understanding on Environmental Justice (August 4,2011) directs federal agencies to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations, allowing those populationmeaningful opportunity to participate in the decision-making process. Guidance 7 by CEQ clarifies the terms low-income and minority population (which includes Native Americansand describes the factors to consider when evaluating disproportionately high and adverse human health effects. The EIS should include an evaluation of environmental justice populations within the geographic scope of the projects. If such populations exist, the EIS should address the potential for disproportionate adverse impacts to minority and low-incopopulations, and the approaches used to foster public participation by these populations. Assessment of the project's impact on minority and low-income populations should reflect coordination with those affected populations. The EIS should also describe outreach and public involvement conducted to all other communities that could be affected by the projesince rural communities may be among the most vulnerable to health risks associated with the project. Please refer to EPA's EJ website8 for additional information. 

Griffin Debra Indirect and Cumulative Impacts 

The indirect impacts analysis should identify how resources, ecosystems, and communitiethe vicinity of the project are affected by the proposed project later in time or father removin distance. We recommend focusing on induced growth and development and other effecrelated to induced changes in the pattern of land use, population density or growth rate, anrelated effects on air, water and other natural systems, including ecosystems. The cumulative impacts analysis should identify how resources, ecosystems, and 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

communities in the vicinity of the project have already been, or will be, affected by past, present, or future activities in the project area. These resources should be characterized in terms of their response to change and capacity to withstand stresses. Trends data should be 

used to establish a baseline for the affected resources, to evaluate the significance of historical degradation, and to predict the environmental effects of the project components. For the cumulative impacts assessment, we recommend focusing on resources of concern resources that are "at risk" and/or are significantly impacted by the proposed project, befomitigation. For this project, the FRA should conduct a thorough assessment of the cumulaimpacts to aquatic and biological resources and air quality, especially in the context of the other developments occurring and proposed in the area. The EIS should also delineate appropriate geographic boundaries, including natural ecological boundaries, whenever possible, and should evaluate the time period of the project's effects. For instance, for a discussion of cumulative wetland impacts, a natural geographic boundary such as a watershed or sub-watershed could be identified. The time period, or temporal boundary, could be defined as from 1972 (when the CWA established Section 404) to the present. Please refer to the Council on Environmental Quality's "Considering Cumulative Effects Under the National Environmental Policy Act: and EPA's "Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA” Documents for assistance with identifying appropriate boundaries and identifying appropriate past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future 

projects to include in the analysis. 

Griffin Debra Mitigation and Monitoring 

Within the process of developing the EIS, if impacts to waters of the U.S. and wetlands 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FEDERAL AGENCIES United States Environmental Protection Agency 

require a USACE permit and are significant, a draft mitigation plan should also be developand made available to EPA prior to the release of the Final EIS. A draft mitigation plan should strive for avoidance and minimization first and should outline appropriate compensation and enhancement measures for unavoidable impacts to wetlands and speciaaquatic sites. A draft plan should include the evaluation of the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative, according to the Section 404(b)(1) guidelines and should outline a monitoring plan. Please note that any compensatory mitigation plan must fully comply with the Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources; Final Rule (Mitigation Rule) effective June 9, 2008. 

Griffin Debra Coordination with Land Use Planning Activities 

The EIS should discuss how the proposed action would support or conflict with the objectives of federal, state, tribal or local land use plans, policies and controls in the projecareas. The term "land use plans" includes all types of formally adopted documents for land use planning, conservation, zoning and related regulatory requirements. Proposed plans noyet developed should also be addressed if they have been formally proposed by the appropriate government body in a written form (CEQ's Forty Questions, #23b). 

a Comments are the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and categorized by topic area. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 3-1b: Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies (InternationBoundary And Water Commission)a

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Topic 

FEDERAL AGENCIES International Boundary And Water Commission (USIBWC) Little Owl Rebecca Please include the United States Section of the International Boundary and 

Water Commission (USIBWC) on the announcement of the availability of the Draft Service Level EIS. The project corridor may cross USIBWC's Lower Rio Grande Flood Control Project in the service areas of McAllen and Harlingen. 

Other 

a Comments are the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and categorized by topic area. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 3-1c: Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies (State Agen

outside Texas)a

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Topi

STATE AGENCIES Kansas House, District 82 DeGraaf Rep. Pete I would like to echo my support of expanding passenger rail along the 1-35 

corridor. I serve as the Chairman of the General Government Budget committee in the Kansas House of Representatives and also serve on the House Appropriations committee. I and other representatives in the Kansas legislature 

are strongly supportive of developing a passenger rail partnership between Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. We see great value in extending the Heartland Flyer north from Oklahoma City into Wichita Kansas. 

Supp

DeGraaf Rep. Pete Expanding north to Newton Kansas would allow for productive business travel 

along the IH-35 corridor all the way down to Houston Texas and also allow the Heartland Flyer to connect with the already existing passenger rail Southwest Chief going east to west into Missouri and Colorado. The use of trains for vacation and business travel is becoming more popular and ability to connect existing rail service seems to make good business sense. More and more businesses understand that rail travel is restful and far more productive than traveling by car or air. It is my hope that Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas will work together in developing an interconnected passenger rail system that includes bring the Heartland Flyer north through Guthrie, Ponca City, Mulvane, Wichita, Newton, and into Kansas City. 

Locaecono

a Comments are the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and categorized by topic area. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 3-1d: Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies (State Agen

within Texas)a

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments To

STATE AGENCIES Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Schmerler Jessica See attachments (map and email) Schmerler Jessica Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) has reviewed preliminary 

information received at the first Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Agency 

Scoping Meeting on March 27, 2013, and offers the following information for consideration when moving forward with this project and preparing a service-level Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 

Pro

Schmerler Jessica Project Description 

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) commenced in winter 2013 and is expected to be completed by fall 2014. It will document the costs, benefits, and impacts of rail service alternatives compared to a no-build alternative in a service-level EIS. The EIS will provide a high-level review of rail needs and potential service options in the corridor (called a service-level EIS). The study could conclude with a decision to advance individual projects for more detailed study or a decision against making further investments in passenger rail in the corridor. Before any identified project could be constructed, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) would need to complete additional environmental review and identify funding. Hi -speed passenger rail has been under consideration in Texas since the late 1980s. In the 1990s, a private consortium was awarded a franchise to design, build, and operate high-speed rail in the state. Although demand appeared to support 

Pro
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments To

STATE AGENCIES Texas Parks & Wildlife Department 

the development of high-speed rail, lack of funding and other obstacles prevented the project from moving forward. Since then, other proposals for high-speed passenger rail in Texas have been submitted to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), with each proposal showing revenues that exceed operating expenses but requiring some amount of funding to build. 

Schmerler Jessica In 2000, FRA designated the South Central corridor, including the area from San 

Antonio to Dallas/Fort Worth, as a future high-speed rail corridor. In 2010, TxDOT received a grant from FRA to study passenger rail in this corridor. The TOPRS will consider a range of passenger rail options for the 850-mile corridor. Today’s passenger rail service can range in speed from 79 miles per hour to more than 220 miles per hour. The different speed options will influence ridership, the number and location of stations, and costs. TxDOT and FRA will make decisions about TOPRS after reviewing input from the public and other public agencies. 

Pro

Schmerler Jessica Recommendation: TPWD recommends using existing railroad right-of-way (ROW) 

whenever possible. Where new construction is the only feasible option, TPWD recommends constructing the passenger rail along existing roads, pipelines, transmission lines, or other utility ROWs and easements to reduce habitat fragmentation. By utilizing previously disturbed existing utility corridors, county roads, highway, and railroad ROWs, adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources would be mitigated by avoiding and/or minimizing the impacts to undisturbed 

Na
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments To

STATE AGENCIES Texas Parks & Wildlife Department 

habitats. 

Schmerler Jessica Purpose and Scale of this Analysis 

The purpose of this letter is to communicate to TxDOT/FRA the general concerns TPWD has regarding potential impacts to natural resources from the construction of the proposed passenger rail. This letter is not intended to replace coordination with TPWD as the proposed project progresses. However, TPWD hopes to make TxDOT/FRA aware of potential concerns early in the planning process to help guide the design and location of the proposed passenger rail and minimize adverse impacts to natural resources to the extent possible. 

Pro

Schmerler Jessica The proposed passenger rail may potentially cross the following Texas Conservation 

Action Plan’s (TCAP) eco-regions of Texas as shown on the attached map. (Including)Cross Timbers, Southern Texas Plains, East Central Texas Plains, Texas Blackland Prairies, Edwards Plateau and Western Gulf Coastal Plain. TPWD reviewed the eco-regions of Texas as designated by the TCAP. The TCAP’s purpose is to provide a statewide "roadmap" for research, restoration, management, 

and recovery projects addressing Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) and important habitats. SGCN include terrestrial, freshwater, and marine birds, 

mammals, reptiles, amphibians, invertebrates, fishes, plants, and plant communities. The goal of the plan is ultimately to conserve and improve the status of these species and, as possible, prevent listings under the Endangered Species Act. More information on the TCAP can be found at 

Na
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments To

STATE AGENCIES Texas Parks & Wildlife Department 

hgp://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/landwater/land/tcap/. Potential impacts to natural resources will generally vary by eco-region. This letter will attempt to address some of these potential impacts on a regional scale. Because a study area has not yet been determined, eco-regions that are traversed by IH 35 are included on the attached TCAP eco-region map. An additional eco-region that is not traversed by IH 35 was added (Western Gulf Coastal Plain eco-region) because there are several potential passenger rail routes in South Texas as displayed on the TOPRS corridor map that was issued at the Agency Scoping Meeting. 

Schmerler Jessica Information regarding natural resources and potential impacts is provided at a 

coarse scale, and general recommendations that apply to all eco-regions have been provided for your planning reference. As this project progresses and a study area is determined, it is recommended that TxDOT/F RA contact TPWD early in the planning process for site-specific information and recommendations. 

Pro

Schmerler Jessica General Recommendations — All Eco-regions 

Below are bulleted lists of potential natural resource concerns that could be a result of the proposed project and recommendations to minimize adverse impacts. The recommendations and potential natural resource concerns listed below are 

applicable to all eco-regions listed above. Natural Resource Concerns: Clearing of woody vegetation, Introduction of nonnative species in native grasslands/rangelands, Clearing/fragmentation of riparian corridors (route would cross most major rivers and many tributaries), Impacts to" aquatic species (freshwater mussels/designated mussel sanctuaries, fish, etc.), Direct 

Imp
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments To

STATE AGENCIES Texas Parks & Wildlife Department 

and indirect (visual/noise) impacts to TPWD managed areas — taking of TPWD property, Direct and indirect (visual/noise) impacts to non-TPWD managed areas (federal, city, county, non-governmental organizations, etc.), Impacts to SGCN from TCAP as well as species shown on TPWD and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) county lists, Fragmentation of wildlife travel corridors, Removal of Whooping Crane stopover habitat in its migration corridor, Taking of USFWS designated critical habitat, Impacts to Colonial Waterbird Rookeries. 

Schmerler Jessica Recommendations: 

Use native vegetation and water conservation in station landscaping, Use bridge spans rather than culverts where feasible to retain stream, characteristics and aquatic and terrestrial movement, Implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) for construction in wetlands/temporary crossings to minimize impacts, Construct wildlife crossings, particularly in wildlife travel corridors, Comply with applicable state and federal regulations (listed below). 

Imp

Schmerler Jessica Threatened and Endangered Species 

The TPWD county lists of rare and protected species may be obtained online at hgtp://wwwfgpwd.state.tx.us/landwater/land/maps/gis/ris/endangered species.phtml. The USFWS should be contacted for guidance, permitting, survey protocols, and mitigation for federally listed species. For USFWS threatened and endangered species lists by county please visit hgtp://www.fws.gov/endangered/. 

Imp

Schmerler Jessica Managed Areas Imp
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments To

STATE AGENCIES Texas Parks & Wildlife Department 

Chapter 26 of Parks and Wildlife Code requires demonstration of no feasible or prudent alternative to taking of TPWD lands such as State Parks and Wildlife Management Areas (WMA). If the proposed passenger rail will cross any TPWD lands it will require an easement or transfer of property authorized by the TPWD Commission. This process can take several months to a year, and compensatory mitigation will be required. If the proposed project has the potential to impact a TPWD State Park, please contact David Riskind at (512) 389-4897 and if the project has the potential to impact a WMA, please contact DCI1IliS Gissell at (512) 389-4407. Please note that Chapter 26 of Parks and Wildlife Code also applies to public areas that are managed by counties and cities. Coordination with the Grants-In-Aid Branch of TPWD and local park administrators is necessary to prevent conversion of grant-assisted lands to other than public outdoor recreation use as prohibited by Section 6(1) of the Land and Water Conservation Act. 

Schmerler Jessica State and Federal Regulations 

State and federal regulations that would pertain to the proposed project include (but are not limited to) the following: Federal Regulations: Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act, Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, U.S. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. 

Imp
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments To

STATE AGENCIES Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Schmerler Jessica State Regulations: 

Chapter 86 of the Parks and Wildlife Code (State-owned Streambeds), Chapter 26 of Parks and Wildlife Code (Managed Areas), Section 68.015 of the Parks and Wildlife Code (Regulates State-listed Species), Sections 12.015, 12.019, and 66.015 of the Parks and Wildlife Code and Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 57.251-.259 (regulates the introduction and stocking of fish, shellfish, and aquatic plants into public waters of the state). 

Imp

Schmerler Jessica Recommendation: TPWD recommends TxDOT/F RA strive to avoid impacts to 

potential natural resource concerns applicable to all eco-regions listed above and 

address avoidance, minimization, and mitigation plans for impacts to these resources in the service-level EIS. TPWD also recommends TxDOT/FRA address compliance with the above-listed state and federal regulations, as well as any others that pertain to the proposed passenger rail project, in the service- level EIS. 

Imp

Schmerler Jessica General Recommendations by Eco-region 

Cross Timbers Potential natural resource concerns associated with the Cross Timbers eco-region are listed below. Clearing of mesquite brush (northern part of the eco-region provides suitable habitat for the Texas kangaroo rat and Texas horned lizard), Clearing of woody vegetation/fragmentation (southern pan of the eco-region, provides suitable habitat for Black-capped Vireo (BCVI) and Goldencheeked Warbler (GCWA), Wintering bald eagles, Interior least tem habitat (along and within the Red River). 

Imp
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments To

STATE AGENCIES Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Schmerler Jessica Texas Blackland Prairies 

Potential natural resource concerns associated with the Texas Blackland Prairies, Eco-region are listed below. Remnant native prairies/habitat for grassland birds and other grassland-dependent species, Clearing/fragmentation of BCVI and GCWA habitat. 

Imp

Schmerler Jessica Edwards Plateau 

Potential natural resource concerns associated with the Edwards Plateau eco-region are listed below. Clearing/fragmentation of BCVI and GCWA habitat, Karst species (salamanders and karst invertebrates), Bats (direct impacts to roosts), Edwards 

aquifer - water quality, Spring-fed streams. 

Imp

Schmerler Jessica Southern Texas Plains 

Potential natural resource concerns associated with the Southern Texas Plains ecoregion are listed below. Rare and protected plants, Clearing/fragmentation of brush (Ocelot and Jaguarundi habitat), Impacts to Ocelot and Jaguarundi, Interior Least Tern (in and near Laredo, e.g., Lake Casa Blanca, Rio Grande), Fragmentation and introduction of invasive plant species in grasslands (e.g., in Coastal Sand Plain), Clearing/fragmentation of unique riparian corridors (i.e., ramaderos), Entrapment of wildlife, including listed species (the Texas tortoise in particular), between tracks, Impacts to state-listed reptiles (Texas horned lizard, Texas tortoise, Reticulate collared lizard, Texas indigo snake), Noise and lights in an otherwise minimally developed landscape. 

Imp
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments To

STATE AGENCIES Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Schmerler Jessica Western Gulf Coastal Plains 

Potential natural resource concerns associated with the Western Gulf Coastal Plains eco-region are listed below. Large unfragmented tracts under single ownership/management, Fragmentation and introduction of invasive plant species in grasslands (e.g., Coastal Sand Plain), Clearing/fragmentation of brush (Ocelot and Jaguarundi habitat), Impacts to Ocelot and Jaguarondi, Entrapment of wildlife, 

including listed species (the Texas tortoise in particular), between tracks, Impacts to 

state-listed reptiles (Texas homed lizard, Texas tortoise, Reticulate collared lizard, Texas indigo snake) 

Imp

Schmerler Jessica East Central Texas Plains 

Potential natural resource concerns associated with the East Central Texas Plains eco-region are listed below. Remnant native prairies/habitat for grassland birds and other grassland dependent species, Houston toad critical habitat. 

Please also refer to the email that was sent to Brian Hausknecht of CH2M Hill on March 11, 2013 regarding recommended Geographic Information System (GIS) 

data to assist in the TOPRS analysis. This email contains several GIS data sources that pertain to the above-listed natural resource concerns. This email is attached for 

your reference. TPWD appreciates the opportunity to provide preliminary input during the first agency scoping period for the Texas — Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study. Please contact me if you have any questions. 

Imp

a Comments are the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and categorized by topic area. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 3-1e: Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies (Metropolit

Planning Organizations)a

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Topic 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIESBrownsville Metropolitan Planning Organization Lund Mark On behalf of the Brownsville Metropolitan Planning Organization, I am 

forwarding a Purpose and Needs Statement (Attachment One) herein, concerning the Passenger Rail Study. In addition to the points outlined in the 

aforementioned attachment, there is another factor worthy of consideration. 

Residenvisitors 

Lund Mark Specifically, provision of passenger rail service can help expedite the safe 

evacuation of elderly persons and persons with disabilities from South Texas, in the event of an approaching hurricane. This objective serves the public interest and promotes the health and general welfare of the community. The current plans or arrangements of evacuating persons via airlifts is inefficient and dependent on the existence of favorable weather conditions. (see attachment) 

Residenvisitors 

a Comments are the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and categorized by topic area. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 3-1f : Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Elected Officials and Agencies (Regional aLocal Government Agencies)a

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIESCity of South Padre Island Newman Marcy TxDOT has indicated the primary intent of High Speed Passenger Rail Service is to 

connect downtown to downtown on the major cities on the route – OKC, DFW, Austin and San Antonio, but the southern terminus in flux. During the Public Scoping meeting in Harlingen, it was suggested that Laredo is the preferred option. 1. The population centers in Lower Rio Grande Valley greater than 430K (2010 census) for BrownsvilleHarlingen MSA and greater than 800K (2010 census) for the Hidalgo County MSA. These are more than triple that in the Laredo /Webb County area (250K (2010 census)) and the border crossings for personal vehicles / personal vehicle passengers (21.8M) are far in excess of Laredo (8.8M) as well. This population and border crossing differential warrants additional study and consideration for High Speed Passenger Rail service and connections to the Lower Rio Grande Valley. 

Newman Marcy 2. The Lower Rio Grande Valley has three major airports that could serve as hubs / 

multi-modal transfer centers drawing on a greater population to utilize HSPR service 

going north – This should be considered when determining the southern terminus. 3. The Lower Rio Grande Valley and South Padre Island in particular, has multiple tourist destinations that could be served by HSPR service and multi-modal connections. This 

should be considered when determining the southern terminus of service. 

City of Arlington Winkelblech Alicia The City of Arlington is supportive of the Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study. We 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

feel it is in the best interest of the region to run this service as close to the middle of the North Texas region as possible. Stations should not be located on the outskirts of the region. This will maximize accessibility to the service and improve ridership. As the third largest city in the DFW region, it is requested that Arlington be specifically included in discussions regarding potential impacts. 

Vice-Mayor of Witchita, KS Meitzner Pete I am the Vice-Mayor of Wichita, KS and I have been the person leading our charge to 

connect the Flyer from Oklahoma City, north, through Wichita, KS and connect with the SW Chief in Newton KS. Also, a day route between Fort Worth to Kansas City as a separate route would be highly desired, we understand the first phase to prove the validity of the expansion of passenger rail service would be the extension of the current 

service. This could be done at a minimal cost, and we in Wichita, are eager and willing to help support this, along with Kansas Department of Transportation. This will prove to further secure the IH-35 corridor as a transportation and trade route for our 3 states, and more. Thank you for your consideration and I urge the study to include this expansion. 

City of Brownsville Martinez Antonio RESOLUTION NUMBER 2013-027, M A Resolution of the City Commission of the 

City of Brownsville Endorsing the Establishment of Passenger Rail Service to Brownsville, Texas. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Brownsville has determined that establishment of passenger rail service between San Antonio, Texas and Brownsville, Texas is needed to afford travel choices for residents of the lower Rio Grande Valley; and WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that proposed passenger rail service between Brownsville and San Antonio, Texas will promote both 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

the general welfare and economic development of the Brownsville urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the City Commission recognizes that having passenger rail service available to evacuate elderly persons and persons with disabilities in the event of an approaching hurricane would serve the public interest and constitute an efficient and safe means of accommodating the special needs of these individuals; and WHEREAS, that the residents of South Texas will benefit from the economic development opportunities that will accrue due to increased tourism to this area by virtue of Passenger Rail services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Commission of the City of Brownsville endorses the establishment of needed passenger rail service to and from Brownsville, Texas. FURTHERMORE, City of Brownsville staff will forward this resolution to TxDOT staff as evidence of the need for such rail improvements, in connection with the on-going Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study. Approved this 16TH day of April 2013. 

Laredo City Manager Villarreal Carlos Thank you for the opportunity to make a few comments regarding the Texas-Oklahoma 

Passenger Rail Study. In discussing high-speed passenger rail that part of the intent of the federal legislation regarding high-speed passenger rail was to include Laredo in a rail corridor. You may ask why Laredo should be included in a high-speed passenger rail project. The City of Laredo is the home of the largest, most-efficient inland port of entry on the U.S./Mexico border. In 2012, Laredo, Webb County, handled 3,592,428 cross border truck crossings. That averages out to about 9,842 truck crosses a day. The port also handled in excess of 8,785,366 passenger vehicle crossings. The total number of vehicles that crossed through the bridge system in 2012 is in excess of 12 million. There are more than 830 trade handling and transportation-related businesses in Laredo, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

Webb County, Texas. Current trade numbers show that Laredo is ranked sixth of all ports in the United States and the only one to have double-digit growth out of all of the district. The significance of the flow of commerce through Laredo is not just a local or state issue. It has been recognized at the highest levels of the federal government as being in the national interest. The need to keep up with the ever-increasing flow of international trade through Laredo, Webb County, clearly outpaces the funding that is available. 

Villarreal Carlos I see high-speed passenger rail as offering many benefits to Laredo, Webb County, the 

state of Texas and the nation. High-speed passenger rail is a way to further promote and stimulate trade and tourism with Mexico. It offers a safe, convenient and comfortable way to travel. 

Villarreal Carlos High-speed passenger rail delivers a new mobility which would relieve congestion on 

the state highway system and reduce state highway maintenance costs. Rail also offers a reduced impact on the environment thereby preserving air quality. 

Villarreal Carlos High-speed passenger rail would be an economic boon to south Texas by creating 

hundreds, if not thousands, of jobs building rail infrastructure and maintaining and possibly manufacturing rail cars. In closing, it is obvious to those of us in Laredo, a city which has no air service to San Antonio or Austin, that high-speed passenger rail would fill this transportation gap. It would also complement the flow of traffic between Nuevo Laredo and Monterrey. Finally, it would enhance and benefit international trade and 

commerce between the United States, Mexico and points south. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIESVillarreal Carlos The City of Laredo supports a high-speed passenger rail project in south Texas and is 

geographically the best suited to handle future passenger rail service. Thank you. 

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department Atkinson Eve Thank you for notifying our agency, the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation 

Department, regarding the study on the service level of rail passenger service. We are concerned that the current passenger rail service is not meeting the needs of travelers to Oklahoma, but also service to areas between Oklahoma City and Texas. The mission of Oklahoma Tourism is to make tourism an even bigger, more vital part of our economy. We concentrate on three areas to energize our state's tourism industry: Enhancing Oklahoma's image to accurately reflect who we are through advertizing and addressing travel perceptions. We must rely on each other to advance tourism in Oklahoma. Our role is to continue building partnerships and assisting tourism leaders. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIESAtkinson Eve Government funding of passenger rail infrastructure: What are the benefits from 

government supported passenger rail service for leisure travel? Can it be justified as an 

efficient way to move vacationers? Is mass transportation for leisure trips a “greater good” for society? There are studies showing highway systems are subsidized. Who benefits the most from highway construction and maintenance? Many highway projects are built using an 80/20 match, with USDOT programs. Is it sustainable to continue increasing the width of highways beyond a certain number of lanes? Is safety culture (benefiting travelers and employees) a benefit from government management of rail transit? According to Progressive Railroading (August 2012), AMTRAK is working to expand a program to improve the railroad's safety culture; improving workforce development initiatives; and investing in more systems and technology that help reduce 

energy consumption and operating expenses. Private corporations and government are interested in safety when worker insurance rates increase. Perhaps auto insurance companies would invest in passenger rail if traffic accidents are reduced. 

Atkinson Eve Effects on the natural environment (such and water quality and habitat) 1) Routes 

avoiding Oklahoma State Parks, Federally funded municipal parks and wildlife refuges should be prioritized 2) Ways to accommodate wildlife / livestock crossing areas should be catalogued for future consideration. 3) Ways to accommodate wetlands should be catalogued, and rated. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIESAtkinson Eve Known needs for funding and an implementation schedule: Improve the reliability of 

the OKC-Fort Worth route. Make it an efficient mode of travel, rather than a traveling amusement ride. (Ad hoc comments) Passenger and freight trains travel at different speeds on the same corridor. Use Positive Train Control. Support the AMTRAK strategic plan: The funding stability that's given managers the opportunity to think bigpicture will help them execute the plan. No longer worried about whether the organization will exist by the next fiscal year, Amtrak managers now can focus on carrying out longer-term strategies. Plus, Boardman (the current director) has been on the job for almost four years and had plenty of time to observe the railroad's operations and gain a firm understanding of what's working and what's not. (Progressive Railroading, August 2012) Modernize the cars: “The train is relatively old. If you expect to use electronic devices, make sure to arrive early so you can snag a seat with an outlet.” (www.redriverhistorian.com /readingtherails.html) 

Atkinson Eve We are addressing the need to revitalize the Oklahoma State Parks System because it is 

an integral part of tourism and one of the most significant recreational components for our citizens. It takes a significant amount of our attention as we continue to protect and preserve their ecosystems. I work with the Recreational Trails Program and Land and 

Water Conservation Fund, both Federal Programs to develop trails and parks across the State of Oklahoma in Oklahoma State Parks and in municipalities in Oklahoma. I participate in the grant application evaluation process and American Disabilities Act 

compliance. I travel to around 20 projects per year. I have a BA in Geography from the 

University of Colorado, 1979. I have 20 years of experience with the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department. I also worked with the City of Boulder Planning Department, and the Denver Regional Council of Governments, in the Transportation 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

Planning Department. 

Atkinson Eve Priorities to address regarding the purpose of the study: Improving the service. The 

service exists between Oklahoma City and Fort Worth, but there needs to be action on 

improving the service. If there have not been studies reporting the level of customer satisfaction, then there should be. Ad hoc comments say it needs to be more reliable. An investigation on the Amtrak site states it meets the time schedule 80% of the time. The site says the delays are due to repairs of the track, rather than the presence of other trains (AMTRAK website), March 2013. More frequency: Viewing Trip Advisor, a travel website, a Texas visitor points out a short trip to Oklahoma City requires a two night stay, as the train arrives late and leaves too early the next day for any meaningful sightseeing. Therefore, a weekend trip from Fort Worth to Oklahoma City would begin Friday afternoon and end Sunday afternoon. In contrast, using a passenger car requires only a one-night stay and the cost for gasoline and parking are distributed among the number of passengers, whereas the cost of train tickets per passenger outweigh the gas and parking costs. 

Atkinson Eve Consider the destinations of the travelers. Sources of factual information may already 

exist regarding the number and frequency of trips through origin-destination studies in 

Geography or Marketing departments of major Oklahoma and Texas Universities. Oklahoma Destinations. Are there more car trips, therefore more demand, for rail services to Oklahoma rather than from Oklahoma? The population of the metro area of Dallas-Fort Worth is larger than the population of the state of Oklahoma population. Furthermore, there are points of origination beyond the Dallas-Fort Worth metro area such as Houston, Austin, and San Antonio. Consider also, Oklahoma has two cities for 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

main destinations, the Oklahoma metro and Tulsa metro. Currently, only Oklahoma City has a rail service. If there is no service further than Oklahoma City, a potential market of passengers will be ignored. There will probably be rail service between Oklahoma City and Tulsa in the next 20 years, so we encourage development of a more reliable, frequent and faster service to Oklahoma City. Demand for Oklahoma destinations are sports events (collegiate football, basketball (professional and collegiate), outdoor sports activities such as bass fishing and OHV recreation, family visits/duties, scholarly activities at the University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma State University and Casino experiences. The participants in outdoor vehicle sports, horse racing or rodeo events probably would not generate rail passengers due to the amount of equipment needed to transport, but the fans would be likely to use the service. The main generators of commerce in downtown Oklahoma City are within 4 to 5 blocks of each other. Among the most notable are the Federal Court, various Federal offices, the Devon building, the Devon Arena Events Center, Sand Ridge, USGS Geologic Library, the Oklahoma City Art Museum, Oklahoma City Memorial, the Skirvin Hilton Hotel, the Oklahoma City Metro Library (holds research reference materials) and the Oklahoma County Court house, and Oklahoma County Jail. These are within walking distance of the train station. The State Capital and many State Departments, the Oklahoma History Museum (for history research) and University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and Children’s Hospital are one mile from the train station, but they are not within walking distance due to a hill and exposure to car traffic. 

Atkinson Eve Origination points south of San Antonio: Which area generates more trips to Oklahoma: 

Corpus Christi, Brownsville/ McAllen or Laredo? Is there a demand for leisure trips 

from south Texas to Oklahoma? Research regarding the number of trips and the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

destination of travelers needs to be shown. Perhaps the data or studies can be found at Texas A&M University from the Texas Transportation Institute. Texas Destinations: Regarding Oklahomans as a source of passengers, Oklahomans travel to Texas for cultural activities (music, sports, shopping, and heritage tourism opportunities, but also 

for corporate regional meetings and governmental offices because it is a regional centerWhat is the most frequent destination of Texas-bound travelers? Is the airport (DFW), Dallas or Fort Worth the most frequent destination from the Oklahoma metro? There is a demand for passenger service to the airport because DFW is the hub for the Oklahoma and Texas area. The closest hubs for non-stop service other than Will Rogers are DFW, Houston and St. Louis. Other airports (Wichita, Tulsa, Dallas-Love, Amarillo, Kansas City) feed into these three (DFW, Houston, St. Louis) for the most part. However, the cost per passenger can again outweigh family use of a passenger car to the airport. For example flights from DFW or Dallas Love airport are generally cheaper than flights from Oklahoma City, but if the train costs more than the plane there is no incentive. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIESAtkinson Eve The trip purpose: How important is it to provide service to quasi leisure trip demand? 

Quasi leisure can be described as a mixed purpose trip, such as medical visits, shopping trips for specialties, “leisure business” such as conventions, music or dance competitions, pageants, Latin dancing, ball room dancing, chapter meetings in clubs and 

organizations such as professional organizations but can serve purposes of tourism. The payoffs for taking the train would be less driving stress (according to the Texas Transportation Institute, The Dallas-Fort Worth area is the 6th worst of the nation, http://www.weather.com/activities/driving/slideshow/traffic.html?page=10&scheme=im

age-horiz-plain.css) Leisure business would require adding stops along the route to a 

major destination, before the metro area is reached. Fostering a mixed purpose trip, (meeting passenger needs) would require more stops to include useful destinations, combining utilitarian destinations with attractions. It is possible to serve the work ethic of “work then play” or “work hard, play hard” by providing opportunities to arrive at a multi- purpose destination. An intermediate hub with light rail links allowing dispersal of trips may work. Altering the schedule to allow all the passengers along the way from Oklahoma City to a point in Texas to transfer to high speed rail throughout the Texas metropolis, could allow passengers to arrive by 10 am in the morning to the airport, to the Dallas Convention Center or to downtown Fort Worth. This would be the ideal scenario. A study or report on frequent destinations from other studies could support this scenario. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIESAtkinson Eve Livability: Neighborhood and regional traffic conditions How can the service be 

improved to make the communities where the passenger train has stations more livable? 

There are two components of availability which support livability, frequency of service and a well designed site. If the train does not arrive during waking hours (6 am to midnight), it is as if the service does not exist. Also contributing to low use rates is poor traffic circulation. If the station site is congested, the parking is complicated, the site is unkempt, complex or requires walking through bus or traffic drop off lanes, it is inaccessible. Furthermore, a train station could be a point of avoidance, similar to a city bus station, if it is designed poorly and not well maintained. If the area appears unsafe people will not want to use the service until gasoline prices or costly parking or lack of parking cause a hardship. Off site design is not a part of this study, but on site design and improved connections needs to be. 

Atkinson Eve Site and Design criteria Stations and stops need to be accessible to people with physical 

disabilities. Also include close temporary parking for seniors and families. Cross walks should be well marked, with crossing signal lights imbedded in the adjacent streets. There should be some outlying parking, a well-lit and open layout to facilitate the change of travel mode. Include accessible service counters, ramps instead of stairs, signs to answer basic questions like arrival and departure times, fares, restroom locations, well marked waiting areas and benches or sitting platforms. Photos of the inside of the rail cars and carry-on stowage should be posted to prepare people to load. Compensate for a lack of an attendant at the OKC AMTRAK station by providing auto kiosks, or a limited choice computer to make information available 24/7. Provide other self service facilities to increase travelers’ knowledge and comfort. Coordinate plans 

with other mass transit modes: Include improvements supporting various modes of 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

travel. Design the site to accommodate buses, shuttle and taxi pick up, drop off lanes separated from passenger car drop off and loading, and temporary parking. Relocating tracks is not as flexible as providing shuttles to improve connectivity. A flexible, demand driven destination shuttle to take people to areas more than 4 blocks away but less than 2 miles away could work. People would wait in “bench rows” according to their destination, and which ever fills up first, leaves first. A transit logistics manager could shift the routes to allow an infrequent destination to “piggy back” on a more frequent one. Studies have been done showing the most efficient way to load an airplane, so a transportation logistics expert could develop a flexible route system. 

Atkinson Eve Measures to share investment costs in the Mass transit system: Investigate ways the 

mass transit industry and corporations could contribute to costs of passenger rail infrastructure and benefit from passenger rail service. Auto and health insurance companies could benefit from reduced traffic congestion on highways which generate accidents. Mass transit can reduce the number of accidents and injuries. Again, research existing studies performed at Universities and Institutions to present the facts. Oil and gas companies can be given incentives to invest in mass transit linking their investment to tradeoffs for carbon emissions. It reduces the carbon footprint of vehicle use, which decreases carbon emissions. 

a Comments are the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and categorized by topic area. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 3-2: Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Tribesa

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

OKLAHOMA Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Fourkiller Tamara 

Francis 

Thank you for consulting with the Delaware Nation. We appreciate your willingness to conduct proper consultation with our nation. We received your letter regarding the above referenced project on April 23, 2013. Upon examination we are interested in these areas. Therefore, we will be a consulting party. Please send further project plans along with cultural resource surveys to our offices and set up a meeting date for the month of June. Should you have any questions regarding this email or future consultation feel free to contact our offices. 

Delaware Nation Jacobs Ms. Johnnie Thank you for the correspondence regarding the above referenced project. The Choctaw 

Nation of Oklahoma has historic interest in various parts of Texas and Oklahoma. In order for us to more thoroughly evaluate our area of interest in relation to this project for NHPA Section 106 review, we would like to request that you send our office a copy of the GIS project line shape file so that we can do further examination. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or concerns. 

a Comments are the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and categorized by topic area. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 3-3a: Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Organizations and Businesses (Organizatio

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

ORGANZIATIONS Brownsville Chamber of Commerce Burton Angela R. When we look at the purpose of the study Brownsville, Los Fresnos, Rancho Viejo, Port 

Isabel and South Padre Island should be the preferred corridor for the following reasons: 

Burton Angela R. 1.Use of the existing Union Pacific Rail corridor can be utilized more quickly, and with 

less expense, than establishing a new corridor. 2. Cameron County (especially South Padre Island) is a premier tourist destination for Texans, as well as national and 

international visitors. Rail service to/from Port Isabel/South Padre Island will lessen 

roadway congestion. 3. The Lower Rio Grande Valley is one of the fastest growing 

areas in the United States. The Valley’s population growth requires development of passenger rail towards accommodating future travel demand needs. 7. The rail service will promote both the general welfare and economic development in the area. 

Burton Angela R. 4. The Brownsville/South Padre Island International Airport has plans to extend its main 

runway. With the continued growth of enplanements from Mexican flights, provision of rail services to points north would reduce demand on roadways in Texas, by allowing these travelers to go north via rail. 5. In the event of an emergency the passenger rail service could effectively evacuate elderly and disabled people. 6. The rail service will provide an affordable means of travel to area residents. 

Greater Waco Chamber Meadors Matthew I am writing on behalf of the Greater Waco Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors 

and the organization’s approximately 1,600 member firms to express the Chamber’s 

strong support for expanded rail service in Texas, and to ask the Texas Department of 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

ORGANZIATIONS 

Transportation to ensure that Waco is connected to future rail systems. 

Meadors Matthew Waco enjoys a diversified and growing economy, excellent natural resources, 

outstanding educational institutions, world-class business and industrial parks, unified and visionary leadership, and much more. The community’s physical location along the dynamic IH-35 corridor, situated halfway between Austin and Dallas, is enviable. However, our great location has also created a number of challenges. The IH-35 corridor is heavily congested, impeding the efficient movement of people and goods, and 

creating safety and environmental quality concerns. Further, we have limited access to 

air service. 

Meadors Matthew Access to a modern, efficient rail system will help address these challenges and position 

Waco and central Texas for continued economic growth into the future. We wish you 

and your team much success with the current study. Please feel free to contact me if I may be of assistance. 

a Comments are the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and categorized by topic area. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 3-3b: Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Organizations and Businesses (Businesses)

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

BUSINESSES Bailey Bill (AW) I am very interested in the study that is to take place, and I want to express my strong 

support for the route to come through Waco. Waco is a major city on the IH-35 corridor and must be included in the route. Thank you for your kind consideration. 

Bailey Wes As a Waco businessman and President of the Waco Business League, I wanted to touch 

base with you and voice my support of the proposed passenger rail service from Oklahoma City to South Texas. This would be great for Texas AND great for Waco. It i

my firm belief that Waco’s connectivity to such a rail system is extremely important to our community’s continued economic growth and vibrancy – not to mention the economic growth of the whole region. 

Bailey Wes When you consider the very limited air service we have in Waco – coupled with a 

terribly congested IH-35 roadway, this new passenger rail system will be similar to manna from heaven. Please know that Wacoans want it! And we need it! Thank you vermuch. 

Brown S. Boyce We support passenger rail service; passenger and freight rail service is critically 

important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position. Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s and region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

BUSINESSES Bucol Mark S. As one who travels to Texas on business trips four to six times per year I would welcom

being able to travel between DFW and San Antonio by train. The traffic congestion on the IH-35 corridor is getting worse by the year and to accommodate growth in commerce, the passenger rail system needs to be expanded. 

Bucol Mark S. The private sector can build, operate and maintain the trains, while the public sector 

finances the infrastructure improvements of tracks, signals, and stations. Most of the 

traveling public will use trains that have top speeds of 90 to 110 mph as long as the trip time is equal or less than travel by automobile and the fare is reasonable. Bullet train systems of 180 to 220 mph are extremely expensive to build and operate. Less extravagant passenger train systems of moderate speeds are more likely to get funded and attract private investment than the very high cost rail systems like those built in Europe and China. 

Bucol Mark S. To meet the needs of Texas for the next 20 years a rail passenger route system that 

connects major cities in Texas with adjoining states is necessary as highways become more crowded and air travel becomes less convenient and much more expensive. 

Chase Goodman 

Felicia The mission of the Cooper Foundation is to make Waco a better place to live. A critical 

part of making Waco a better place is ensuring our community’s long-term economic success. For this reason, the Cooper Foundation strongly supports passenger rail service in Waco.
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

BUSINESSES Chase Goodman 

Felicia Both passenger and freight rail service are crucially important to maintaining the state’s 

enviable national and global competitive position. Locally, Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to our community’s and our region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. Thank you for your consideration. 

Christensen Tate I am writing to you today in regards to an extremely important matter and wish to 

express my support for passenger rail service. We support passenger rail service and want to encourage TxDOT to ensure Waco is connected to any future rail system. Passenger and freight rail service is critically important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position. Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s and region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, 

environmental concerns and safety concerns. 

Esrock Brett Providence Healthcare Network, Waco’ s leading employer, supports passenger rail 

service and passenger and freight rail service which is critically important to maintaininthe state’s enviable national and global competitive position. Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to our community’s and region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. 

Gutierrez Christopher H. I am a very active player in Regional Economic Development. Please note my support 

for passenger rail service. Not only is passenger and freight rail service critically important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position, it 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

BUSINESSES 

is an essential reliever to the overburdened TxDOT highway system. 

Gutierrez Christopher H. Connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the Waco community, as wel

as the region’s continued economic growth. Given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns, it is absolutely essential that the passenger rail service from Oklahoma to South Texas become a reality and most importantly that there specifically be a Waco Junction serving as a hub to our region. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. 

Hicks David The purpose of this letter is to express my strong support of passenger and freight rail 

service which is critically important to maintaining our state’s enviable national and global competitive position. As you consider plans for this service, please keep in mind 

that Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to this region’s economic vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. Waco is the center of Texas as more Texans can be found within a 100 mile radius of Waco than from any other spot in 

Texas. I wish you well in this project and would be happy to participate in any way I can

Hookham Bernadette As an architect in the local community, I support passenger rail service and freight rail 

service as it is critically important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and globacompetitive position as well as supports a more sustainable means of transportation for people and movement of construction materials thru the region. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

BUSINESSES Hookham Bernadette Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s and 

region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. Thank you for your assistance. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions. 

Hulse Monte Please accept this letter as support for rail service, both passenger and freight, for Waco 

and Central Texas. It is vital for our economic growth. We have limited air service and our roads are congested hampered by environmental and safety concerns. Thank you for your support in making sure Waco is connected to any rail lines proposed through our area. 

Klemp Richard The Kansas Star Casino in Mulvane, Kansas supports efforts by Texas to advance 

passenger rail service into Oklahoma in order to extend service into the Wichita area and eventually meeting in Newton, Kansas to connect the Heartland Flyer with the SouthweChief. 

Kultgen Peter I would urge that Waco along with the other major cities in Central Texas be included in 

whatever configuration of passenger rail the TxDOT study is considering. As our community continues to grow and with its central location it is very important that we have access to any such passenger route. The further benefit of helping to relieve congestion on IH-35 should help save the State of Texas money in the long run. Thank you for your consideration. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

BUSINESSES Lee Jeff I am one of the executives for Members Choice Credit Union in Waco, TX. Our 

organization enjoys a membership base of 30,000+ members and I would like to communicate to you that Waco would be able to support passenger rail service. I agree with my peers that passenger and freight rail service is critically important to maintaininthe state’s enviable national and global competitive position. 

Lee Jeff Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s and 

region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. Waco is in a nicposition with easy access to major cities and must be included in the vision. As we examine our future growth for Waco, this must be in the plan. In advance, thank you for your review of my correspondence to you and your team. 

LeRow Stefan As a resident of Waco, TX and frequent traveler on IH-35, I strongly support the 

proposed passenger rail system from Oklahoma City to Laredo, TX. If economically feasible, I would love Waco to be included in the routing of this service. Please let me 

know how I can support your efforts in making this idea a reality. 

Lopez Carlos I support the passenger Rail Service from Oklahoma City to South Texas. Pieri Parker F. It has come to my attention that the state of Texas will be conducting a study on a 

proposed passenger rail line from Oklahoma to South Texas. Passenger (and freight) raiservice is very important to keeping the state of Texas competitive in the regional, national, and international economy. It is vital that Waco be connected to these rail systems so that the greater Waco community can continue its economic growth, especially given the communities limited access to air service, congested roads, and 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

BUSINESSES 

safety and environmental concerns. If you have any questions or would like additional input, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your time and consideration to this matter. 

Pueblitz Paula I believe that the rail system is a great idea. I would personally use it. I have family in 

North east Texas and in Brownsville. I hope that this railway system comes to light 

Recks James I understand that the Great State of Texas recently received a grant to study expanded 

rail service in Texas. As a business person in Waco who travels IH-35, I appreciate the amount of planning and effort TxDOT expends to try to keep pace with the growing 

Texas population and its transportation needs. Let me say THANK YOU for all the greawork you are doing. May I also say that the residents of Waco are 100% in favor of youpossible rail service expansion and we in Waco want and need to be a stop on any proposed line! Keep Waco in mind and keep up the good work! 

Sheldon Rick Please accept this letter as an absolute YES for rail in the future! TxDOT’s rail passenge

and freight service is absolutely vital to the future of Texas and, especially, Waco and thCentral Texas area because of our lack of air service, along with congested roads, environmental concerns and safety concerns. Good luck and let us know if there is anything we can do to help. 

Solano Alfred We support passenger rail service; passenger and freight rail service is critically 

important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

BUSINESSES Solano Alfred Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s and 

region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. Thank you for the work that you do to further the continued economic growth and success of our State. 

Stafford Chad I am writing in support of the proposed study of passenger rail service from Dallas/Fort 

Worth to Oklahoma City and up through Wichita, KS to Newton, KS along the 1-35 corridor. I am president of Wichita based Occidental Management and we are a real estate development firm and actively involved with economic development in the South Central Region of Kansas. This connection would not only open up business travel withpotentially, Amtrak but would also allow for dramatic increases in commerce between Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. These connectors make the IH-35 Corridor a very attractive and affordable business attractor to further the jobs growth of all three States. 

Stanton Tom As Executive Director of the Bernard and Audre Rapoport Foundation in Waco, Texas, 

wanted to express support for passenger rail service, as it is critically important to maintaining the state’s national and global competitive position. 

Stanton Tom Waco’s connectivity to any and all rail state rail systems is vital to our community and 

the region’s continued economic growth and development, particularly given the 

competitiveness of limited air service, interstate congestion, not to mention environmental and safety concerns. 

Stanton Tom We ask and urge that Waco is assured connection to any future rail system. Thank you 

for your insight in development of this much needed method of state transportation. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

BUSINESSES Still Willard What a wonderful opportunity for Texas to have the $5.6 million Federal grant to help 

fund a rail study. With a good route and stops near populated areas, a well-designed rail system would complement our excellent highway system by relieving congestion and adding a great deal of safety as Texans travel. 

Still Willard You would expect me to support Waco being a stop for the rail system and I do so. Wac

is a growing Texas community and is home to Baylor University, TSTC, and McLennan Community College along with many productive and successful industries. It is the 

major community between Dallas and Austin and because of that we have limited accesto ample air service. Passenger rail could make a real difference for this community by reducing travel on IH-35 to reach a more major airport. 

Still Willard Thanks for your work to begin this important study. Whatever we in Waco may do to 

assist you would be our privilege. We are bullish on an effective rail system for Texas 

and we would be grateful for your support of a stop in Waco. 

a Comments are the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and categorized by topic area. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Table 3-4: Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Individualsa

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Austin Mary Trains are an economical way to travel. Therefore, people who can't afford to fly or 

unable to have access to an airport are stranded in small towns. It is scary to drive in city traffic. 

Austin Mary Yes, trains blow their whistles but cars and trucks are noisy too. Railroad crossing 

don't kill people - people not stopping is this cause. 

Austin Mary Small town America has a lot of interesting and education things to see. Trains would 

make it easier to see and enjoy this with trains. 

Austin Mary With more people on trains means less cars and less accidents. Many people are hit by 

cars while walking or biking, so safer. 

Austin Mary With so many highways, we are losing a lot of trees and habitat for animals and then 

there is the emission from so many cars and trucks. 

Austin Mary Faster, more modern trains would be nice, but we need to keep train travel that senior 

citizen and people of medium income can afford. We love to travel but planes are not what is needed for rural areas. If you decide to build new tracks - please don't bypass the small towns – we need safe transportation. Personal: I had to go to San Antonio to help my child. Without the train in Ardmore it would have almost cost prohibitive for me to travel. Driving that far by myself was not an option. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Brown Linda M I was not able to attend the public meetings related to IH 35. I have traveled IH 35 at 

least twice a day Monday through Friday for 20 years, sometimes more trips than that. Austin is a popular destination, and becoming more so every year. In my opinion, more lanes is not a satisfactory option. Looking to the future, ideas need to be "out of 

the box" to keep Austin moving. As other cities like Chicago, New York, London, Austin needs mass transit. If not a subway, then elevated trains. I would definitely use a commuter train that ran down the middle of IH 35 from Georgetown to Kyle, Buda, San Marcos, San Antonio, for example. A train is not slowed by traffic conditions, and being down IH 35 would allow stops to be within walking distance of government offices and the entertainment district 

Brown Roy G The proposed expansion of rail service will greatly help and benefit all residents, 

businesses, and visitors by providing a much needed alternatives to our overcrowded airports and highways. 

Brown Roy G At current speeds there is not much concern about existing crossings, but for high 

speed rail there would need to be designated tracks with no or very few crossings. 

Brown Roy G By promoting tourism (advertising) and providing frequent service between the large 

cities to encourage taking the train, it would greatly benefit the regional and local economies not only by bringing in money, but by encouraging cities to build mass transit systems 

Brown Roy G I see none as long as crossing are either secured by adequate warnings or eliminated 

altogether. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Brown Roy G There would be no more effect than in any other place in the world where trains are 

frequently used. In fact, trains are the greenest way to move large numbers of people - far less intrusive than the interstates. 

Brown Roy G I have lived in Washington, D.C., and ridden the trains in the northeast. I have ridden 

trains in and out of Chicago. I have ridden trains all over the Europe, including high speed trains in France and Britain. I know that wherever good train service is provided, it is heavily patronized and enjoyed, and the same will be true here in Texas and the Heartland. Let's go!!! 

Cervenka Jo The people of Texas love their cars and will not change their habits very easily. Time, 

personal choice and independence of movement is important to Texans. Speed in reaching a destination is not always needed or wanted. The grand idea of building a high speed passenger rail across Texas is not the answer to moving people from point A to points B, C, and D. The taking of personal property from certain people to benefit the schedule of other persons and calling it progress is wrong. 

Cervenka Jo Yes, traffic during certain hours in the morning and afternoon, to and from work, is 

terrible on certain parts of the IH-35 corridor in Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio. Staggering the work hours might help that problem. There have been 

times when I had no problem at all with the traffic while driving through these cities. Transportation problems with trucks on the interstate roads are the problem. The trucks are not using the present toll roads because of the costs, so I am told. Independent truckers need a job too, I understand! How can we better use the freight lines to move some of the necessary goods and services? Working with the freight railroads should be looked at for improvements. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Cervenka Jo Has a feasibility study of an elevated rail line over existing right of ways been looked 

at or thought about? Sure, there are curves that would slow down the train - but, you could still keep the line elevated while straightening out the curves and not impair the present use of the land. 

Cervenka Jo I object to foreign companies buying and operating a high speed rail system. I object 

to the state turning present (paid for) interstate highways into toll roads. 

Cervenka Jo How many studies have been conducted on this same topic? I know, the past studies 

that have been done before are available and do not need to be repeated. 

Cervenka Robert All high speed passenger rail proposals for Texas have been defeated before. Texas is 

not ready for high speed rail. At destination, there is no infrastructure in place to move passengers to the where they want to go. 

Cervenka Robert The last mile being the most costly and difficult to complete. Families traveling could 

not afford to travel compared to the cost of an automobile. 

Cervenka Robert Most of the problems traveling are not cars, but trucks, now many trucks. Freight 

should be moved by rail and stacks trailers and trailer trains. Our freight railroads are a disgrace. 

Cervenka Robert As a rancher a high speed rail through the ranch would be devastating. It would be 

impossible to move large equipment and animals to the other side. Highway frontage adds value to farm land. Rural agriculture would resist high speed passenger rail, but would not oppose freight rail expansion. It would be impossible to keep Texas Ferrell hogs off of the right of way. We don't need to destroy more agricultural land. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Cervenka Robert Enclosed road takes away value. Noise and pollution add to devaluing. Nobody wants 

to live by a noisy rail-line. 

Cervenka Robert Two freight rails, side by side, in present right of way, and being one way, would 

solve our freight problems and get trade off highways. 

Cervenka Robert Cities and government don't need to continue incentives to bring people to Texas. Our 

schools, jails highways and water needs are being overloaded now. High speed rail is right for Europe and Japan, even large cities in congested areas of the USA, but not all over Texas. 

Egly Larry Today I read an article about TxDOT asking for comments about a potential OK to 

Dallas to San Antonio rail line. I think it makes a lot of sense to establish a rail line along those lines. 

Egly Larry When I go from Killeen, TX, to Joliet, IL, I take AMATRAK. It's slower, but much 

less expensive than flying. Also, I can read, play games or just relax while the train 

crew takes care of getting me to Joliet. Joliet, as well as other cities surrounding Chicago, utilizes the Metro rail system to commute in that area. The fares are very reasonable. Again, I don't have to do the driving, so I can read, visit with my family or just relax. 

Egly Larry I think TxDOT should study the feasibility of: 1. A high speed rail train along the 

route under consideration. 2. A normal speed train along the route. 3. What will be the costs of running either 1 or 2 above on their own dedicated rail line. I say this because AMTRAK uses other railroads tracks, so sometimes its passengers have to wait on a siding so the railroad that owns the line can use it. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Egly Larry A rail line will be more environmentally friendly than individuals driving their cars on 

the same route. 

Egly Larry I think that it is great that TX is considering doing this study. I hope that the oil 

industry is not allowed to scuttle the idea because they would probably sell less gas if TX developed such a rail line. 

Lancaster Terry I am a native Texan-senior, retired. I'm sorry but Texas just does not have what it 

takes to develop a large project such as this. The Super Collider and Trans-Texas projects all merely drained millions of tax dollars from other doable causes. Do we need mass transit? Yes, definitely, but we needed it 30 years ago. Only way to do it would be to lease the overhead rights from existing railroads like BNSF and connect DFW to Houston-San Antonio. Do the large metropolitan areas first and plan for later connections to outlying centers like Austin and Waco, etc, later, possibly with a trunk line connection. P.S. I am ex-railroader for l5 years. 

Muhl Rene I am definitely in favor of creating a rail transportation system throughout Texas and 

especially from Fort Worth to Denton and Oklahoma. 

Muhl Rene IH-35 is so congested and a rail system would go a long way to help alleviate the 

problem. The rail should also include transportation from Fort Worth to San Antonio and beyond. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Frank Loraine Congratulations for being farsighted about high speed rail services and conducting a 

serious Texas-Oklahoma Rail Study. Though I live in Oklahoma, my families and friends all love to go to Dallas and points south to the gulf and Houston. Some even have families along that route. with rail service all of us would visit more often! I share your vision and also believe that 1. Building now will never be cheaper 2. Your best route might be following the old "Texas Eagle" (Is that the right name?) 3. Weather would not deter travelers, businesses, or increase accidents on the highways. 4. Our Heartland Flyer train to Fort Worth always has many passengers but the Dallas route would be much more popular. Wish you a successful outcome to your study leading to Texas being the initiator in starting high speed rail in the heartland of the country! 

Heard Tom Passenger rail is a tremendous benefit to tons that have it. TxDOT should not think 

just of having stations in big cities. 

Heard Tom train horns are noisy. TxDOT should look at more grade separated crossings. Heard Tom High speed rail on dedicated tracks is too harmful to agriculture to be done in Texas Heard Tom TxDOT should be mindful that adding at-grad road crossings will someday be a 

problem to expanding passenger trains. 

Heard Tom Why does an EIS study need to be done on existing freight railroad where cross ties 

and coal trains exist? 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Heard Tom It is good to see TxDOT studying conventional rail like all the other states, finally. It 

is clear that high speed rail on dedicated tracks is dead in Texas. TxDOT needs to develop a rail plan based around utilizing existing tracks with the freight railroads. 

That may mean more passing tracks and double tracking sections but both parties benefit from this. Texas is falling more and more behind other states. Texas needs to get started doing this. 

Abeyta Amy High Speed train travel is the future! A line between all the major cities of Texas 

would be so beneficial for human communication and commerce! El Paso should of course be included. Big vision but doable! Great for the state's interrelatedness and for the environment! 

Ables Chuck Texas is sooo far behind. Acosta Eugene I am writing you in support of the high speed rail project for Texas. As a frequent 

business traveler, 30 + flights per year, I would welcome the opportunity to take a train to the Austin, San Antonio, and Houston areas. It would be easier for planning, conserve fuel and all the other conservation benefits. This project makes good 

business sense for frequent regional travelers like myself. 

Adams Mike My wife and I support the extension of Light Rail systems to all of Texas. Give us a 

safe, clean alternative to air travel. 

Adams Ed There are way too many cars and trucks on our roads. Let’s bring on the trains. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Aeschbach Heinz and 

Margaret 

We would like to urge government agencies to work on developing rail systems in all parts of the U. S. The U. S. has been far too slow in developing an efficient passenger 

and freight rail system, both light rail in urban areas, regular passenger rail (everywhere double track) and high speed trains for intercity traffic. Trains are much more ecological, safer, more comfortable, healthier for passengers (the stress of driving and air travel is very problematic. On the long run trains are an excellent investment providing cheaper transportation than cars and airplanes. 

Aiken Debbra High speed rail throughout Texas would help greatly to reduce the pollution in both 

the air and water. It's time we had this here. 

Aiuvalasit Michael I am writing to encourage the expansion of high speed commuter rail lines in Texas. 

Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

high speed rail line that follows IH-35 would be a great addition to transportation options. 

Aiuvalasit Michael Currently, the AMTRAK options between Dallas and Austin are too slow to be 

worthwhile for me to use. If I had an alternative to driving on IH-35 I would certainly take advantage of it, as would many Texans. 

Akers Jerry Rail saves time and money. Driving is more expensive in time and money. In other 

words, it is time for Texas to take a step toward the 21st century. Build it. 

Akkaraju Giri Mass transit has many well studied and published benefits, including, less wear and 

tear on roads, less accidents and more productive use of travelers time. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Alardin Susan I fully agree that we need PASSENGER rail service running through the TexasOklahoma corridor, most specifically from Laredo to Dallas. Alardin Susan IH-35 has become an extreme risk for all drivers. I live in Laredo but work in Temple 

and must commute home on weekends and I have seen numerous accidents and many near accidents. I was very pleased to discover the 130 toll road that bypasses Austin. I prefer to pay to drive safe than take a chance with the HEAVY traffic on IH-35. I only wish the toll road continued on to Laredo, bypassing San Antonio because IH-10 has become just as bad as IH-35. I believe this Passenger Rail would alleviate much of the heavy traffic if the rate is fair (equal to or less than what you pay for gas) and it does not take as long as a greyhound bus to get where you need to go. 

Alardin Susan Currently Amtrak runs from Temple to San Antonio but it takes 5 hours. You can 

drive it in 2 hours (a little less, with no traffic if you take the 130 toll road which has a posted speed limit of 85 mph) so why would you want to take Amtrak or Greyhound? We need a direct express passenger service for commuters and travelers who want to get where they need to go as quick as possible without long layovers, and stops in every town, similar to the train service on the east coast. 

Allen Ned With fuel prices expected to stay high, population growth to continue, and highway 

traffic projected to increase, it is time to move forward with most Texans dream of high speed rail. We own the easements along the freeways already, we need to build the infrastructure and operate a state or Amtrak-owned high speed rail system up and down IH-35 from Oklahoma to Laredo, IH-45 from Galveston to Dallas, and IH-10 from Beaumont to El Paso. It is time to bring Texas into the 21st century with 21st century infrastructure. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Allred Patrick D. This comment is in reference to the Rail passenger Service that is being studied 

between Texas and Oklahoma. I'm in favor for it especially if it runs from Laredo-San 

Antonio-Austin since there is a lot of traffic between those cities on IH-35. 

Allred Patrick D. With the Ford Eagle Shale, there is a need to either expand IH-35 to 3 lanes each way 

from Laredo to San Antonio or install passenger train service between the two cities in order to get out of the way from all the trucks/18-wheelers that use IH-35 to go back and forth from their work site. This is in addition to all the 18-wheelers that used IH-35 to cross into Mexico via the Port of Laredo as part of the NATFA agreement between the United States and Mexico. I feel there is also a need for passenger train service between San Antonio and Austin as well. IH-35 is pretty much built out to the max as there is no other land on it to be able to expand it. While there is that new highway from Seguin to Austin, it’s pretty much out-of-the-way for most people who want to save time and money. If you ever driven between the two cities, you know that the experience is something similar to the Daytona 500 of NASCAR where a lot of cars are kind of bunched up for most of the trip. In conclusion, I'm all for passenger service between Laredo, Texas to Oklahoma City. 

Alpert Emily I would like to express my support for the proposed rail corridor from Oklahoma City 

to Brownsville/South Padre Island. Currently our options here in the Valley are to fly or drive to destinations North. We could choose bus service, but there are Security issues with that mode of transportation. 

Alpert Emily Rail is fast, efficient and reasonably priced. When I am traveling on business in the 

Northeastern part of the country, I frequently use rail to get to a variety of destinations. In fact, I wish you would develop a monorail system from Brownsville to McAllen following the 77/83 corridor. Please contact me if you need more 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments information. Thank you. 

Altmeyer David We need more high speed rail in Texas. It is good for the environment and the people 

of Texas. It is a win, win for Texas and all Texans. 

Alvarez Yolanda C. Please support the Texas/OK passenger rail study on going and passed. Alvarez Humberto Plus less gasoline usage. Use of the rail will increase tourism. Alvarez Humberto I approve for the development of the Texas-Oklahoma rail. It will relieve congestion 

and make travel more accessible to other cities if we not want to drive. Think of senior citizens who no longer are capable of driving, using the rail. 

Anderson Leo I am interested in reducing noise, traffic and having life be more healthful. Bring on 

the train! 

Anderson Vicki I think the option of rail service from South Texas is really exciting. We are elderly 

and live in Zapata but have to travel to San Antonio every 3 months for specialized medical treatment. We are soon to be to the point where a long car trip will not be safe for us. A passenger train would allow us to visit our friends and family in Oklahoma and Missouri. The traffic on 35 is awful and getting worse, any mass transit alternative would be an asset. Hope it gets done in our lifetime. 

Aqeel Alina Rails provide a good alternative to cars. Rails reduce the number of cars on the road 

and reduces air pollution. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Araiza Alex I feel like having this would be very beneficial for those who have to commute to 

other cities, but also would help cut down on pollution coming from cars. 

Arnold Gretchen I am writing to express my strong support of, and confidence that passenger rail 

service between Corpus Christi and San Antonio is very needed and would be heavily utilized. On a daily basis, thousands of people drive from Corpus Christi to San Antonio to catch an airplane, catch a train, shop or do business. I am most certain the same number of people drive from San Antonio to Corpus Christi daily for business or recreational purposes 

Arnold Gretchen The motorized vehicle mode of transportation between Corpus Christi and San 

Antonio is a source of congestion, air pollution, and fuel consumption. The drive itself has little to offer in terms of interest or aesthetics. Quite frankly, it is one of the more 

plain, boring and uninteresting drives in Texas. So much so, that most of my associates hate the boring and time-wasting drive. Because the lone drive is mandatory (no other mode available), drivers are forced to the mindless drudgery of the boring drive and either doze off or race to get it over-with, causing numerous fatal accidents on this stretch of Texas road annually. Motorists would be clamoring to get out of the driver’s seat and into a train seat to read, work, or relax on the Corpus 

Christi/San Antonio leg of their journey. 

Arnold Gretchen The San Antonio connection of an Amtrak hub greatly increases the value of this 

component of the system. Travel anywhere in the U S via train is open to all with this one opening leg of passenger service. Some environmental impact may occur during the project, however that would be minimal as the rail line would take place on existing rail line and build-outs would be minimal. The associated reduction in air emissions by taking thousands of vehicles off of the road daily would more than offset 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments any negative environmental impact of the project. This one leg opening up for passenger service could be instrumental in the continued attainment of air quality standards and therefore no conformity planning requirements that Corpus Christi, TxDOT regional MPOs and San Antonio currently enjoy. I encourage TxDOT to support this study and move ahead with moving South Texas ahead in alternative modes of transportation. 

Arredondo Richard I would like to see high speed rail in Texas. Texans travel frequently to major Texas 

cities and either have to drive or fly. Neither option is very appealing. Driving costs too much because of high gas prices and is also very dangerous driving alongside huge 18 wheeled trucks. Flying is faster but you have to go through long lines for security checks, pay baggage fees, and pay for expensive plane tickets. Please bring high speed rail to Texas so we have a fast, clean, safe, alternative form of transportation. 

Art David Rail transportation option is preferred due to 

•Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. •A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. •Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. •Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Attwell Barbara We would ride the rail every chance we get - and when we go to Europe this is what 

we do. We fully support any and all rail as it reduces pollution, traffic, and is very relaxing. 

Attwell Barbara I would only ask that when you lay the lines through rural areas that you regularly 

provide for tunnels underneath for wildlife. Yes - wildlife, It deserves to exist here as 

much as we do. Thank you for your considerations. 

Awtrey David We would love to see the passenger service completed from Oklahoma city to 

Newton, KS, and on to Kansas City and Chicago. This is important because of the potential energy savings and it eventually become profitable. It would increase 

passenger usage greatly because of the access to other cities. 

Baeza Christine C. My only comment is: It's about time!! GO FOR IT!!! Bailey Wes As a business owner in Waco, Texas and current president of the Waco Business 

League, I just want to voice my support of the passenger rail service that would serve our community. I am delighted that Waco is currently shown to be included on the pathway, and I believe there would be great support of the rail service from the greater Waco area. Thank you. 

Bailey Brooke Please move forward on bringing passenger rail to Texas. I would hope the days of 

Southwest Airlines blocking this are over, and we can move forward. Although I am a 

native Texan (Austinite), I have lived in areas of the country and in Europe where rail was used extensively and was such a nice, relaxing alternative to driving. In Scotland I never owned a car, and in Chicago I put less than 1,000 miles a year on my car-that is a huge impact when amplified by many. Although the implementation costs are high, the long-term benefits to our transportation needs, stress levels, and society 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments outweighs this (although I would hope there would be STRONG oversight). Please do this, we've been waiting for 30 years! 

Baker Candace I would definitely use rail service. I am currently an Amtrak user and have taken the 

train both east and west. Rail service from Laredo to San Antonio would provide a 

great service to connecting airlines providing more alternatives for travel. 

Baker Candace I would also use the train for travel within Texas as an aging citizen who does not 

drive at night. In addition, it would provide for additional safety when traveling alone. 

Ballou Tom I like trains and like to ride trains. I'm on the board of our local Rural Rail District. 

Given equal convenience, time and cost, I would choose the train for travel. However, the convenience, time and cost are all important. Designing the long distance, city to city portion of this system is easy. The difficult part is the terminal system for getting people on/off and mobile. Texas cities are not equipped with adequate mass transit systems like, for instance, Washington, D.C. where one can get off the high speed train from New York, walk down one level, get on the Metro and a few minutes later get off in the basement of the hotel where you are staying or few blocks away at most. People in Texas are tied to their cars. Perhaps a study of using a variation of the "Auto-Trains" used for seasonal people repositioning on the East coast and extensively in Europe would work for us and make the long distance rail attractive. Perhaps a new design car, a bi-level as used by Amtrak, but with the lower or upper level used for cars and the other for the people. The speed at the terminal would be the key. Of course, we'd probably have to limit the cars hauled to compacts/city commuters and leave the Crown Vics and Suburbans at home in order to make it work. Getting this to actually work in Texas is going to take some out-of-the-box thinking. I don't think "If you build it, they will come", is going to work. Let me know 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments if I can help. 

Barbosa Ron The residents of Texas need more mass transit options to help protect the quality of 

life for all. 

Barker Charlotte A. Thank you for this opportunity to respond. A rail system to South Texas is much 

needed and would be beneficial. The European rail system has proven the efficiency of rail for travel and the success of Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth indicates it would be an excellent additional travel choice for South Texas businesses and residents alike. 

Barker Charlotte A. The benefits of having a rail system available in S. TX would be environmentally 

appropriate. Reducing energy consumption and automobile and air traffic; benefiting our air quality; a safer travel option; benefit our economy with added visitors and job opportunities. - I personally travel to Austin and Houston several times per year, on 

both personal and business trips, and would preferably utilize a rail system over driving or air travel. 

Barnes John I want Texas to have high-speed rail service. I suggest Texas uses the existing rights 

of way and builds elevated rails above the highway. Zero land purchase expense is a good thing. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Barozinski Brenda First of all. This form should be in only English. I thought Oklahoma had a law that 

all communication is only English. I recently rode the train from Oklahoma City to San Antonio. I had never been on a train, I was shocked at the depot in Oklahoma City. Only opened during the train arrival and departure times. When arrived absolutely NO one around to answer or direct people. Went night before to check on location and parking, no one to direct me in parking questions, had to get a number off the billboard. I enjoyed the ride but was also surprised by how old the train was and the interior. But, I think the train service is good for Oklahoma but I think the commission should also explore rail service from Tulsa to Oklahoma City to Texas. 

Barrera Roberta I would support this endeavor and vote on any bonds that it would support. I have 

been waiting to hear that someone is thinking about doing this. This is the USA and we are far behind in our quality of life of offering an alternative to the highway. I know so many people who commute from San Antonio to Corpus every day. The weekend highway traffic is filled with people visiting Corpus and Corpus people visiting San Antonio. 

Barrett Claire I support the development of rail in Texas and in the United States. Our air quality 

can be greatly improved if we have save, comfortable options for travel. 

Barros Russell I support a rail transportation system for people between Oklahoma and south Texas. Barry Sean Speed and frequency are critical to making intercity rail successful in Texas. True 

high-speed rail would be nice, but higher-speed rail would be acceptable to get the route open sooner (and get more folks riding sooner...with a long-term plan to upgrade to true HSR, much as the model taken in the Northeast Corridor). Ultimately the train doesn't have to be the fastest way to get from one city to the next, but it 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments needs to at least be somewhat competitive, meaning much faster service with much shorter layovers is needed as compared with the current Texas Eagle service. 

Barry Sean Multiple trains each day in each direction (preferably at least 6 trains/direction/day) 

are needed to make the service workable with schedules. Also, the train needs to serve 

downtowns in all cities (not suburbs, not airports, etc.) and the stations need to have transit connections, be in walkable locations near hotels, have taxis, car-sharing, bikesharing, etc. readily available, as well as car rentals for folks whose final destination 

is not the central city. 

Barry Sean Lastly, Waco desperately needs to be included on the route. It is a joke that the current 

Texas Eagle bypasses such an important city along the corridor. 

Batts Flora I strongly support the development of higher speed passenger rail service between 

Oklahoma City and South Texas. It's a great step towards reducing traffic on the IH35 corridor, reduces pollution, provides more alternatives to travel and is a safer, 

cleaner way to get across this great state. 

Baughman Peter I strongly support higher speed passenger rail from South Texas to Oklahoma City. Bazzrea Farah I can only say, "Thank you." We are in dire need of quality, high-speed rail 

transportation. I have four children living in the Austin-San Antonio corridor--and two granddaughters. To have high-speed rail service in Ardmore for Central Texas, the Rio Grande Valley and points beyond is the stuff dreams are made of. You will enhance the lives of Okies and Texans for generations to come. "Thank you. Thank 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments you. Thank you." 

Bear Randy Leveraging passenger rail could potentially reduce the need for more road 

infrastructure to be developed as well as improve the environment from an emissions perspective. 

Bear Randy I currently leverage Megabus between San Antonio and Austin as much as possible. 

The convenience of traveling by shared services greatly improves my workday, since I can also do work on the bus. 

Beard Cynthia I support the increase in long-distance passenger rail service in Texas for these 

reasons: 1. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars 

per passenger. 2. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports. 3. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. The air quality 

in the Dallas Metroplex is horrible and needs to improve. 4. Existing rail tracks could be used for more passenger services. This would be an efficient, budget-friendly use of existing infrastructure. 

Beard Cynthia 4. Existing rail tracks could be used for more passenger services. This would be an 

efficient, budget-friendly use of existing infrastructure. 

Beck Jennifer Rather take train than drive or fly. Bednar Deaton More rail, please. Trains keep more cars off the road. Air quality improvements. Less 

car crashes. Plus it is more fun to ride a train. Let's do it! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Bell Carmen Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Bennett Carolyn W I am VERY ready for high speed rail! We, Texas, has been mulling over this topic for 

decades now. Though Europe and Asia have successfully incorporated their rail systems into the public norm, the folks here in Texas have stubbornly refused to use what should have been such an easy fix... But NO... Too many people want their very own, individual gas guzzler trucks and SUVs in this state. Individualism that sucks our resources dry and creates the largest boondoggle of an interstate highway traffic monster right through the heart of our state... I have often imagined travelling across this huge state by high speed rail...taking a moment to breathe...read a book while I speed to Dallas, Houston, Austin, or San Antonio, with or without my family members of all ages. All within the quiet walls of 'advanced,' 20th Century progress (not even dreaming of 21st Century technology and benefits.) Go OK/TX Rail!!!!! 

Bennett Jo Our state needs other alternate methods of safe, convenient good for the environment 

transportation..especially in high density areas for instance between Dallas and 

Houston 

Bentley Brian I would support high speed rail between OKC and South Texas. It is a better option 

for the citizens and the environment compared to building more roads, or adding more 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments planes. 

Benton Barry Robert I live in the Rio Grande Valley and would love rail passenger service throughout 

Texas and beyond. I would use it religiously. Flying has become more expensive and more stressful every year. I don't have to tell you all the upsides to rail from reduced traffic congestion, safety, less pollution and economy. Just do it. Better yet, tell me what I can do to help. 

Benton Stan Texas is a very large state (almost half as large as Alaska), and the chief means of 

getting from one part to another is by car. I drive on narrow, 70 mph speed limit highways, and see many zooming by me going 10 to 20 mph over the speed limit. As I near the cities, the congestion becomes frustrating, and dangerous, with drivers speeding to cut in and out, and others going 20 mph below the speed limit, hogging the fast lane with nobody in front of them. I don't see texting, but see many drivers talking into their cell phones, not looking at the road in front of them. (From my own experience, I am talking mostly of Austin and San Antonio.) I would love to be able to use inexpensive public transportation (but not flying, as I can't afford that). 

Benton Stan As far as air quality goes, one also sees many of these speeding vehicles smoking to 

the point where it appears they are on fire. A high speed train, powered by wind and solar, could make a large impact on the air quality, especially in our cities. 

Benton Barry Robert I live in the Rio Grande Valley. Please do this project. I promise to ride often. We all 

know the many, many reasons trains are better than cars or plane. Please, just do it. 

Betterton Elaine My husband and I want to buy an electric car but the range worries us for long 

distance trips. Having a viable rail service for Texas would fill that void for us 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments without having to hassle with airports, which we wouldn't do. We want to do what's right for the world and the combination of electric vehicles and a good rail system in the state/nation would go a long way to improving our air quality and reducing the stress on the roads/infrastructure. Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

 Beverly T. The building of rail-lines disturbs the natural landscape and wildlife the least. All 

disturbances of the environment eventually affect our water system and I really, really, really wish more people realized this. Three things for life...air, WATER, and food and I think water will become a HUGE issue before the other two. For me, I would love to travel by TRAIN to California. 

 Beverly T. The train trip not only uses less resources than flying but it is a less expensive way to 

travel. As it is, I must drive to San Antonio which adds time then pay gas and pay parking. My expenses are as much a concern as the environment. 

Birdwell Amy I am excited to hear that TxDOT is planning on expanding our public rail systems. 

We need more public rail and we really need high speed rail. I am for high speed rail 

line expansions in Texas. Thank you. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Bischof Robin I believe Texas needs more passenger rail. When people have the option to take a 

train, there are few cars on the road. I know I would even travel more if there were more rail passenger options. For example, if there was high speed rail between Dallas and Austin, I would definitely make the trip more often. 

Bischof Robin Having fewer cars on the road means less pollution so that our air quality is better and 

there is less automobile-produced run off going into our water supply. People are also healthier because there are fewer toxins in our air to breathe. Trains can reduce air pollution by half when compared to cars and even airplanes. 

Blasingame Rodney I am in total support of this passenger rail system. I would use it frequently. I am 60 

years old and I have family all along this route. I am 12 miles east of Waco, Texas. It would be so easy for me to catch the train in Waco and go North or South. 

Blaze MJ High speed rail service would reduce the amount of traffic congestion on already 

crowded highways, and provide a cost-effective and time-effective means of transit for many people. I fully support this effort to provide a high-speed rail on the IH-35 corridor. 

Blodgett Elaine One of the many things we need in Texas is a better transportation system. Anything 

you can do to help would be deeply appreciated. 

Blomquist Franklin In the past the railroads passenger service was top notched. I traveled many miles on 

the train. I would like to see this kind of service return. I'm sure it would cost a lot of money to restore the service, but I think the future will find that you will have no 

more room for highways. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Blount James R What with light rail in Dallas and Houston, dependable, efficient, public, intra-city 

transportation is becoming a reality in Texas. What is sorely lacking is state-of-theart, inter-city, rail transportation. There is no good reason why we can't have it. It's becoming a reality California. The same could happen in Texas. 

Boatright Larry We need rail service. Bodeharrison Olukanyin Fast rail linking Oklahoma to Texas. Please start this rail ASAP. Our veterans will 

benefit from it a lot. The rest of us will benefit from it also for several reasons- 1. Save the air we breathe in. 2. Save energy. 3. Save the road. Thank you. 

Boelsche Joyce Please make the Austin to Oklahoma City train line happen! I know of many instances 

that I would have taken a train instead of an airplane or car if I could have. This line will save fuel and at the same time reduce pollution by car or airline fuel. That will make our air cleaner and our lungs cleaner. I look forward to being able to use this train route. 

Bogholtz Erick We should have had high speed rail back in the 1980's but Texas let Southwest 

Airlines lobby it out of the picture because they said it would hurt their business. We need the alternative to get cars off the road. 

Bombay Bart I write in support of high-speed passenger rail for Texas. Whenever I travel on 

business in France, my trips are always facilitated by the high-speed rail travel in that country. I am able to travel between major cities more quickly and efficiently than is possible by air or auto. I don't need to worry about horrendously complicated security screenings or arriving to airports more than an hour before my flight. I just arrive to the train station shortly before my departure. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Bombay Bart Then when I get on the train, I can be productive on my laptop computer during the 

entire journey, which is a huge benefit to my business output. From the perspective of business success and personal convenience, high speed rail is a huge improvement over other options. But the business and convenience factors are not the only benefits. 

Bombay Bart High speed rail also lessens the congestion of autos on highways, which not only 

benefits the people who must drive on those highways, but also gives an excellent benefit to the environment and air/water quality by reducing emissions of C02 and other pollutants. Human health and safety benefit from cleaner air and safer travels, which indirectly benefits businesses across a wide spectrum. Please help bring Texas the many benefits of high-speed rail between our major cities. 

Bondoc Jr. Benito A. I think this would be a great way to travel. In bringing this extra option to Laredo. I 

would use the services if it were to happen. 

Booth George Vote NO! Against the rail... A huge waste of money just like the $12 billion taxpayers 

have already paid. Your children and grandchildren don't want the debt... 

Borst Gayle I very much support the expansion of passenger rail in Texas!!! Life is too short to 

deal with the kind of traffic congestion, energy consumption and environmental 

pollution that we have now. 

Bourland Gordon I strongly support development of increased passenger train service in Texas, 

especially high-speed service between major metropolitan area such as Fort WorthDallas and Austin, Houston, and San Antonio. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Bourland Gordon Such rail service would be beneficial due to reducing automobile traffic and 

automobile-produced air pollution, reduced fuel consumption by trains (compared to automobiles and possibly airplanes), as well as increased comfort and reduced stress (compared to having to drive a car). 

Bourland Patricia I support the rail alternative for Texas: Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce 

the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. 

Bourland Patricia South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer 

between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. Thanks! 

Bowen George I would be very interested in service from Ardmore to Dallas. Bradbury Theresa Most of the rest of the world has found it beneficial, why can't Texas? This has been 

discussed most of the last twenty years, it is time Texas got with the program. 

Bramblett Sharon Please make high speed passenger rail service available to us between OKC, Dallas, 

Austin, San Antonio, Laredo, and Houston. The OKC-DFW route is a model of how to do it. You must seriously consider rail as a more viable option to building more roads - it's the future. Thank you, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Bramblett Sharon It is much more efficient, carrying large numbers of people in a short time. It will 

reduce more expensive car and short plane trips, saving so much energy, not to 

mention improving air quality. 

Bramblett Claud Invest more in high speed rail. The only practical solution to reducing vehicle traffic 

is to have rail alternatives. 

Brannon Emily Having just read that TxDOT is considering passenger rail service through the State 

that will connect North Texas and South Texas excites me. I would love knowing that I have an alternative to flying and/or driving when I visit my friends in Corpus Christi. Rail is so much cleaner than airplane or auto use and is such a pleasant way to travel. Bravo! 

Bransom Melissa More rail travel options are a great idea! Commuters would welcome the alternative; I 

know I would! My concerns are the environmental impact considerations during and after construction, 

Bransom Melissa safety for travelers, and the potential for on-board security at all times. Also, would 

local businesses do the work or would the bidders be open to global businesses? I look forward to the outcomes of the survey. Thank you for asking! 

BrantleyGearhart Kristine Please pursue developing the rail from Oklahoma to South Texas, so more people can utilize this environmentally saving transportation. It will also reduce traffic (TxDOT 

will be relieved), and encourage and increase older adult travel (and others who 

struggle in traveling). 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Braswell Peggy After having used European high-speed rail, it is very exciting to think that we might 

actually have that option here in South Texas. I can envision using this service frequently! Please move forward on this project. 

Bratu Dr. Cristian I cannot tell you how excited I am about the prospect of having a train connection 

between Oklahoma and Texas. It is entirely unacceptable that, at a time when modern countries boast tens of thousands of miles of rail (and even fast trains), Texas is still lagging behind in terms of rail transportation. I drive very often on IH-35 and we all know how congested this highway can get. I am grateful that TxDOT is now adding extra lanes to IH-35 on certain sections but no matter how many lanes we add, the problem of traffic will NOT go away if we don't have an alternative to IH-35. Rail is 

the solution to that problem. I believe that having a train connection between OK and TX is an extremely important project and I hope it will be adopted and implemented 

as soon as possible. 

Braun David Convenient, speedy, and safe travel around the state (and beyond) will improve air 

quality, and reduce the impact of travel on global warming. 

Bray Brent We actually need alternative transportation here in Texas, as the carbon footprint left 

by all of the automobiles sharing the road is huge, and could be lessened if we have high speed rail throughout Texas. This will help reduce air pollution, and traffic in the urban areas. We need a better mass transit system than we have as the system in Travis County is ridiculous. Not much mass transit outside of the City of Austin. The problem here is that nobody wants to pay for better mass transit. Pretty sorry state of affairs here. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Bray Jennifer J. Texas needs high speed rail. The Interstate 35 corridor is one of the most deadly 

highways in North America. My city, Corpus Christi, would greatly benefit from increased tourism if there was high speed rail connecting Corpus Christi to San Antonio. High speed rail connecting San Antonio to Austin to Dallas is a no-brainer. 

Bray Jennifer J. Do what's right to 1) help the environment, 2) reduce traffic fatalities on Texas 

highways, and 3) increase tourism and travel in Texas. 

Brehm Angelica I would like to see you approve a new, higher speed passenger rail service between 

Oklahoma City and South Texas. Below are some reasons why: -Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. 

Brehm Angelica South Texas has no passenger rail service. -The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer 

between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers -Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. 

Brehm Angelica A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per 

passenger. -Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Brenner David I read the department of transportation is considering high speed rail along the 1-35 

corridor. I believe this is essential to bringing Texas (Dallas-Austin-San Antonio) into 

a world class competitive corridor and strongly endorse this consideration. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Brewer Cameron As a citizen of Norman, OK, an employee in Oklahoma City and my hometown being 

San Antonio, this study is important to me. I have been a passenger on the Amtrak lines between San Antonio and Oklahoma City numerous times. Most often, I rode the Heartland Flyer between Gainesville, TX and Norman, OK, however, I have ridden the train all the way from Oklahoma City to San Antonio three different times (each round trip). My main comment is that I would like the study to include total passenger time to get from Oklahoma City and San Antonio, and why people often prefer driving because the time it takes for this entire trip is far too long. Each trip took between 13-14 hours. The first two trips were test runs, and the third out of necessity due to car issues. My question is why would I take a train that is 13-14 hours that is barely cost efficient, if at all, to driving where I could make the trip in 7 hours? Please, please study the layover times in the DFW area and other areas on scheduling to make the time more efficient. If I were able to make the trip in 8-9 hours by train, and breakeven on cost, I would do this in a heartbeat. 

Bridges Diana I am very excited about the possibility of this new rail line. I think it's a huge step in 

the right direction. I look forward to hearing more about this in the near future. 

Bridges Terry S When, oh when, will passenger rail service come back to College Station. Train travel 

is my preference but I have to drive at least an hour to get to a train. I heard reliable rumors about a year ago that we would be linked to Amtrak. Haven't heard anything since. We already have the rails and the name of our city says it all. What is the problem? 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Brittain Cindy I have had the chance to use trains in other parts of the world that were a VERY 

VERY wonderful means of getting around. SO I SAY YES to the Texas/Oklahoma rail proposal! I live very close to IH-35.oh my yes, we need to take some cars off the 

road, and get the lovely people into the trains! 

Brooks Michael I really support this Rail Proposal, and the higher the speed the better. Rail is one of 

the safest most efficient ways to travel. 

Brooks Michael It also has the potential to take thousands of vehicles off the highways, and decrease 

highway congestion and reduce emissions. 

Brooks Michael These rail choices, rather than highway only choices can also reduce the impact on 

wetlands and wildlife by decreasing the potential of vehicle accidents and chemical and fuel spills on the highways. Please fund all Rail transportation proposals to the highest extent possible. Thanks. 

Brooks Scott A. I do NOT support any taxes used for passenger rail service. Passenger rail is an 

inconvenient and inflexible mode of transportation that will not be self-supporting because automotive (including buses) transportation is more flexible and convenient. As long as fuel is inexpensive, cars and buses will always remain the most popular mode of transportation. To spend tax funds on passenger rail would be a complete waste of money! In fact, if tax funds are being spent on this study, I think it's a complete waste. There's a reason why the idea of passenger rail has fizzled out in Texas. Why are we wasting money on this again? 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Brown Tyler My comment relates to the Human Environment as a whole. That means Walking, 

street life, being a part of a community. These are all things that are encouraged by rail transportation and discouraged by wider, bigger roads. Invest in this now and you will see the benefits of denser real estate development, higher property taxes, better land use, and a more profitable society in the long run. Invest in Roads and you will see continued suburban sprawl, continued unsustainable development practices, and a continued deterioration of our society and our economy. The choice is yours TxDOT. Either lead or fail us all. 

Brownell Katherine I am support high speed rail for the State of Texas. Our state is past due for a reliable, 

green way to travel around our state. Cars and airplanes are fine but we need other alternatives. I have traveled in other countries and love using rail and high-speed rail for travel. 

Bruny Interested in having alternatives to traveling with less congestion...hoping to see the 

vision of Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail study become a reality. 

Buentello Elena This proposed is a must a long overdue. This rail system will take stress off of the 

infrastructure and provide the people of Texas and Oklahoma communities with transportation options! 

Bulla D.D. Texans need alternatives to cars. We need more rail options. We should have high 

speed rail between DFW, Houston, San Antonio and Austin. We could have had this years ago except Southwest Airlines killed it. European rail travel is a true delight and has a much lower carbon footprint. Texas doesn't need to lead the nation in pollution any more. Let's give our residents a choice when it comes to transportation. High Speed Trains from city center to city center could be faster, more efficient, less hassle 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments and less damaging to the environment. 

Bulla Dale This is a very confusing survey. Can't really tell what it is measuring. What is EIS? 

What do each of the items in Human environment refer to? What are the specifics of Natural Environment that are mentioned. I have never filled out such a survey which I really didn't know what it was talking about. 

Bunch Julie I think this would be a good thing because it would get more cars off the road which 

would decrease pollution and there would also be fewer accidents. 

Burgin Alyssa If we can bring this type of passenger rail to Texas, we will be able to eliminate many 

road miles of automobiles, each with their individual passengers. The resulting cut in emissions would be substantial. Plus, there would be a cost savings for many Texans. I travel about 40,000 miles a year through Texas, the overwhelming majority of those miles being for business only. I would definitely use a passenger rail line if we had one going through Texas to Corpus Christi. 

Burnham Anne I support the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger rail because I care about our air quality, 

reducing our use of oil, and having more transportation choices. 

Busti Steve Having a passenger rail will help reduce traffic congestion, especially on IH-35 

through Austin. It is also a better choice for the environment as air quality will be improved by keeping more gas-guzzling cars and trucks off the road. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Busti Steve When I was in Europe, their passenger rail system was incredible! I was able to travel 

country to country without the need of a car. If America had that kind of rail system we'd be much better for it. Plus high speed rail will get you there much faster than 

conventional automobiles. I am in full support of expanding passenger rail. 

Butler Sylvia ITS A GOOD IDEA FOR JOBS Cadena Patricia I support adding the passenger rails to the proposed areas. An elderly population is 

one segment that would benefit by its availability which adds to human health and safety. another aspect would be one more avenue of evacuation when hurricanes threaten especially for those without vehicles and/or less tolerant of bus travel. Since the rail lines already exist in Corpus Christi I can see no impact on the environment especially in comparison to industrial ones that already exist. 

Cadena Aida Please seriously consider high speed rail here in Texas. This is a great option for folks 

who can't make the drive for a variety of reasons. This just makes sense! 

Cameron Jean We need high speed rail in Texas that at least runs from Houston to Dallas and stops 

in College Station. Another helpful route would run through Austin from San Antonio to Dallas. 

Campbell Sherrill I am very much in favor of increasing more passenger rail service in Texas. As I grow 

older and foresee not wanting to drive as much because of vision issues, I really welcome other modes of transportation. 

Campbell Sherrill I am also concerned with air pollution and waste of natural resources that keeping 

more cars on the road insures. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Campos Dolores Rail service to South Texas, especially Laredo, is a great idea. Please continue to 

pursue this project. Great job!! 

Cano Christian Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Cano Christian South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer 

between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn 

travel time into work or leisure time. 

Cantu Roel South Texas does not currently have rail service. If indeed rail service was to be 

available for us South Texans we would jump at the opportunity to visit friends and relatives more often. We would have less pollution and wear and tear to our car. A truly win/win situation. 

Cardenas Juanita I agree on the Railway for an alternative way of travel, I foresee IH-35 as a very 

congested interstate in the near future and these would alleviate some of the congestion. Hopefully, all safety precautions will be taken into consideration, given the land where these railways will be operating. 

Cardenas Juanita Time of travel should be carefully studied, because we will be wanting something fast 

and safe to reach our destination. 

Carr Mia Don't feel U have given enough info. Carter Joshua I am currently a college student at UTA that was in Austin for a Day trip a few days 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments ago for recreation. The cost of gas is outrageous and I believe the state would benefit from this rail system. Is there any way this rail system can go to Houston, TX, alongside I 10? I say this since Houston is the biggest city in Texas and IH-35 does not run through Houston, Houston needs a rail system like every other city that will be included in this project. 

Caylor Margaret Rail would bring a clean environment, convenience, less traffic, more jobs, faster 

service and less noise. Please keep me informed of the progress. 

Cazabon Catherine More affordable public transportation in Texas would make travel in this state more 

efficient. Tourist dollars can help many communities become more self-supporting! 

Chadwick Douglas I am very much in favor of efforts to expand high-speed rail service as an alternative 

to additional paved-road construction. 

Chamberlain Clinton I applaud the effort to investigate improving passenger rail travel between and within 

Texas and Oklahoma. Access to fast, efficient rail transport would help alleviate congestion on our highways, which in turn would reduce pollution and improve air quality and the health of humans and the rest of the natural environment. Having lived in other parts of the country as well as in other nations where passenger rail networks are more extensive, as well as faster and more efficient than here, I can attest that a well-developed passenger rail infrastructure makes travel easier and more pleasant, and it definitely helps keeps cars off the road. 

Chamberlain Ida Having our old train station in Laredo is a great opportunity for those who travel 

frequently or not to either San Antonio or Corpus Christi. I do travel quite often to these cities and would like traveling by train rather than using my car. As people get older, they look for a more convenient and affordable ways to get away and enjoy 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments other great destinations. I remember when I was young we would travel to Chicago, IL, to see my dad, a factory worker. So my mom would take us 3 kids on a long journey from Laredo all the way to Chicago's Union Station. Please bring this service back to Laredo. 

Chamberlain Richard It would be great to be able to travel through Texas with ease and the convenience of 

public transportation. This will not only benefit the industry, it will benefit each city in gaining revenue and capital because travel is easier throughout state. 

Chambers Allison With all the new construction of freeways, my husband and I, keep thinking they 

should be building rails too!! There are too many people on the roads as it is. II see more people in huge trucks and SUVs driving alone than with passengers. Texas would benefit tremendously by making rail transportation possible and easily accessible for commuters and travelers. Please consider making Texas more eco friendly by building a new rail system!! 

Chapa David Over the years, I have seen the traffic on IH-35 increase and security being at risk. In 

my experience, part of it is greatly due to the increase in the import/export business. More trailers and 18-wheeler trucks are traveling on the same highway as passengers. 

Chapa David Due to this, and a forecast increase in trailers on the highway, Laredo is a prime 

choice for the train. Passengers would have a better traveling option and the decrease in traffic will make our highways safer for travel. On a side note, an alternative route to Houston will also clear traffic from the already over-crowded highways and it would further help connect the Gulf to the inside of the state. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Chatham Faith I favor more passenger rail service in Texas. We cannot afford to continue expanding 

highways and putting more cars on the road without increasing other ground transportation options. We need affordable rail with schedules both ways each day between major urban areas. Texas Transportation dollars should help construct rail. 

Chavarria Gus Sr Anytime that you remove cars from the road you are helping the environment. You 

are saving lives due to the environment and traffic accidents. Let’s hope that one day we can make our country car free. 

Childress Gary L. We need to dramatically increase our rail services to include many new areas being 

serviced. There is no reason our rail services in this country should not equal or exceed the availability, safety and usefulness of the systems in Asia and Europe. For energy independence...for clean environmental reasons and to reduce the congestion 

on our roadways. INVEST IN OUR NATION’S RAIL SYSTEM (we subsidize air and road transportation now, so that excuse is lame). 

Chowdhury Jolene My family would support this imitative. Clark Mary I rather enjoy traveling by rail when I can and being able to travel all over Texas by 

rail would be wonderful. I suffer from problems in my legs and being able to get up and stretch and walk around is so much easier when done by rail. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Clark Leighton I like to travel by Train. I like to go to Huston and to Corpus Christie - but I hate the 

drive, although I know lots of people who do it regularly. Please consider the following points: 1) Trains will keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. 2) A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. 3) The existing Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers ANYWHERE! People will love 4) Train stations are a lot more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. You can get a lot done (safely) on a train that cannot be done driving a car. Please make this happen! 

Clark Leighton 5) Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 6) 

By accommodating more passengers with trains, we'll reduce the need to continually 

expand roads which encroach on wild lands. 

Clark Roger America needs better north/south transportation alternatives. The extension of 

passenger rail north of Oklahoma City to Kansas City and beyond to Omaha and Minneapolis makes sense as well as extending south to Houston. This could be a long 

distance route for some but more importantly it makes many city pair connections. 

Clarke Rita Except for "THE BIGGEST" - why does Texas have to always be THE LAST! in 

almost every human advancement?!? It's demeaning, discretionary, pig-headed, ignorant, destructive and almost entirely driven by powerful, wealthy white males. I'm really sick of it. I rarely tell anyone that I live in Texas....it saves me a lot of grief!! No more idiotic highway construction!! Build the high-speed rail system and get out 

of the stinking OIL BUSINESS!!! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Claver Rev. Karl A. Texas needs more passenger trains, and more routes, so we can get Texans off the 

highway and on to the rails. Tracks must be repaired, so trains can travel safely at around 90-100 mph. Routes to Laredo, Brownsville, Corpus Christi should be restored, as well as El Paso to Fort Worth (via Midland), Dallas to Houston, and a route to Denver. Texans love to ski in Colorado, but there are no trains to the Rocky Mountain State. Also the Heartland Flier needs to be extended to Kansas City. 

Claver Rev. Karl A. Amtrak is more fuel efficient and causes less pollution than busses, cars or airlines, so 

the carbon footprint is more environmentally friendly when travelling by rail. 

Claver Rev. Karl A. The price of gas is increasing, and to keep Texans mobile, more Amtrak passenger 

service is vital to the Texas economy. Instead of wasting money by constantly digging up LBJ freeway in Dallas, and adding more lanes, improving rail transportation is a much wiser solution. 

Cleere Patricia Rail transportation for both goods and passengers is far superior to air, auto or bus 

forms of travel, not to mention more environmentally sound. As the cost of petrol rises, people are welcoming rail travel as an expedient alternative to highway trips. On the East Coast is the one Auto Train in the United States between Orlando and Washington, D.C., which is a delight as well as highly efficient. If there were one East-West train, say between Orlando and Los Angeles, and one on a northern route from the northeast through Chicago, then on to northern California or Washington State, I am sure they would be highly welcomed by the public. 

Clevenger Gaylynn Texas (especially central Texas) continues to grow at a rapid rate and our highways 

are simply not able to handle the numbers of vehicles. We need rail service now more than ever! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Cloughley Robyn Please, a train!!!! Cobos Miguel This is a great idea, as a student in Austin and originally from Edinburg, Texas I can 

speak for many of my fellow students by saying that this indeed is a necessary investment. The often 5 to 6 hour drive would be better replaced by a train ride by saving gasoline consumption. 

Colbert Mildred More choice in transportation, relaxation, and safety. The bus line is very unreliable, 

schedules are very late and the delays make for lack of connections. The rail will be exciting for those who never had access to the rail-lines. Would like the comfort it would provide, more spacious seating and dining area would be very beneficial. 

James III Alfred Yesterday's Wichita Eagle had a good article (copy enclosed) on your extension plans 

for Amtrak service, stating your several options for extension of the OK-TX route, 

and inviting comment. My wife and I are frequent Amtrak passengers, utilizing the Chicago-Los Angeles train through Newton, KS, as well as many other connecting routes east and west. We have done so four times so far just this year. It is usually on time, very comfortable, and usually full, very popular despite the early morning arrival/departures. We find most passengers, as ourselves, strongly prefer rail to air travel. As you know, BNSF is wanting to retire the present route from Newton to Albuquerque in favor of a southern route through Wichita/Amarillo, which is better trackage and would add two major cities to the route to Albuquerque. Wichita's ViceMayor Pete Meitzner and former KS Lt. Gov. Shelby Smith have spoken strongly in favor of this and we wish to add our endorsement. It makes economic sense as Oklahoma/Texas experience and several recent studies have shown. Transportation Secretary LaHood has strongly endorsed and urged Amtrak plans, and has stated that 

again, the public is way ahead of the legislators. We respectfully urge your serious 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments consideration. 

Collins Kristi We need this badly. Some express lines would also serve enormously. Collins Kristi The money spent on freeways and so on that supports the auto industry has held us 

hostage since WWII. Eliminating passenger rail in the process was always an overreach and never should have happened, the advantages to which ran its course 

within 20 years of its inception. Bring back the long and short distance passenger rail extensively. 

Colon Pedro J. I think that a rail service of that nature to connect Texas with Oklahoma is a great 

idea. Will be faster and cheaper for people in both states to communicate. Environmental friendly also. Talking from myself I will use such services to visit other state. Hope the prices will not be too high. But I will like to see the project become a reality. 

Columbus Whitney We need to reduce pollution and continue to offer public transportation to combat the 

rising cost of gas! 

Conklin Spencer I support high speed rail or bullet trains like they have in Europe that run on 

electricity. We should build that here now. 

Conrad Roxanne I am highly in favor of expanded rail service! As someone who travels a great deal, I 

rely on Amtrak for a lot of my long-distance trips, and although I often see comments that Amtrak "needs to increase ridership," every train I board is full, with every seat and bedroom sold out, especially on long haul routes heading east, west and north. Amtrak needs better routes, faster, newer trains and most of all, the means to offer 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments convenience to travelers to get where they need to go quickly. Thank you. 

Cooper Janet A rail line would fit my needs perfectly, and would be safer than by road or air. Also 

less polluting. 

Corley Pat Strongly support improved passenger rail service to south Texas, and north from 

Oklahoma City, through Wichita, to Kansas City. I would use such a service several times yearly if available. 

Cox RoyAnn Trying to increase the amount of asphalt and cement to accommodate the number of 

cars on the highway will never work. We will only decrease the quality of our lives, air and community. It has been shown that rail is more efficient in moving people and products, therefore we must work to increase the lines between cities, urban and rural. 

COX MASON W I support TxDOT's proposed Oklahoma-Texas Passenger Rail service for the 

following reasons: •Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. •A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. •Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

COX MASON W •South Texas has no passenger rail service. 

•The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers •Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. 

Craft Adrea I support all rail/high speed rail projects. I am a frequent passenger of the Texas Eagle 

from Austin to Chicago and I would LOVE to see improvements in ALL rail services. If I could take the train, I would never fly again. Rail service is the norm in Europe; I feel it can(and should) be here too. 

Craig Mark I am writing in support of the proposed high speed rail line between Oklahoma City 

and San Antonio. This rail line would provide a greatly needed option for travel in this area. Anyone that travels here knows how congested IH 35 is (and getting more 

so), and that air travel is also packed. Rail would move more people for less energy, 

which would save money and the environment. And it would take traffic off the highways and airways. It's all good. Please help rail happen in Texas! 

Crane Virgil High speed rail is a necessary element in the progress of moving larger numbers of 

people. As Texas continues to grow in population high speed rail is a requirement to help in preserving our environment. 

Crawford Dana I support the rail! Crawley John Rail should have never given way to the automobile. The more highways we build the 

more real estate is destroyed and we still have traffic congestion. LONG LIVE 

RAILWAY! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Crettenden Denise We need more passenger rail options in South Texas. Currently our only options are 

to drive to a bigger town to take an interstate train. We travel to San Antonio and Austin and the ability to make that trip by rail would be great. The ability to travel to other cities like Corpus Christi would be great as well -- we would be able to travel more often. Passenger rail is very important to help make fewer car trips, which would greatly improve the air quality here. Passenger rail would also help connect smaller towns with each other and with larger cities without putting more cars on the road or paving over more land with roads. It would also enable people without cars or with cars that are not reliable enough for long trips to visit other cities for errands or to commute for jobs. We need a wider variety of options in South Texas to reduce car use, improve air quality, save energy, and allow travel for those without vehicles. 

Crooks Charles After looking at the map, it would be beneficial in my opinion to adjust the route from 

Denton to places south. To bypass either of the major population areas is a mistake. My suggestion is to from Denton to Fort Worth, east on the Trinity to Dallas, then south to Waxahachie on existing track, and from Waxahachie to Hillsboro on the abandoned right of way. (Waxahachie has just completed restoring the depot located at the north end of the abandoned right of way). 

Crow Crystal Why would we not want more railway transportation? It is exponentially better for the 

environment than cars, more cost efficient than planes, and is certainly a great 

alternative for so many people and would open up the door for travel for so many in our great state that have never had the opportunity, be it because their cars are not dependable enough to go long distances or because of a fear of flying. 

crust Monica In general, the more eco-friendly changes that take place, the better. That includes 

transportation. This being done, while leaving the maximum amount of naturally 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments occurring green space possible, along with the least amount of additional toxins introduced, will be good. 

Cullen Beth Population growth in Texas is growing--rail would help lessen the impact of all of the 

above by decreasing the number of cars on the road. 

Curtis Cynthia A better, safer, energy-saving alternative is needed for passenger rail service to be 

expanded. This would enable families and individuals to travel affordably and 

comfortably in a timely manner. The highways by car and bus are far too overcrowded and unmanageable for the elderly. Gasoline is costly for the traveler in a 

private auto. Congestion is paramount in this day and age, perpetuated by inexperienced drivers, distracted drivers and angry drivers. Distances are long and continuous construction is hazardous. 

Curtis Connie How will building this impact the environment ? will it destroy farmlands? I need 

more info 

Czar Melissa I want more Rail services and Rail service options like the Texas/Oklahoma line 

proposal in Texas. 

Dale Steve I care about our air quality, reducing our use of oil, and having more transportation 

choices. I am writing to express my support for the proposed Oklahoma-Texas Passenger Rail. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Davis Chad As part of the MY35 committee, I proposed the route from Fort Worth to Oklahoma 

City by connecting, Fort Worth, Wichita Falls, Lawton, and Oklahoma City. This would connect 4 major Military posts and would be on a route that would be much more suited for the level terrain needed for rail. The right-of-way costs would be 

much less than the IH35 corridor and would avoid much of the environmental wetlands that are on the IH35 corridor. 

Davis Sara Bringing a passenger train to Corpus Christi would solely provide a positive impact to 

the well-being, and safety of the residents. Vehicle traffic on major and minor roads has greatly increased since the explosion of the Eagle Ford Shale across south Texas increasing the numbers of accidents, and causing more tax dollars to be spent on road maintenance. By adding a passenger train to an already existing track, residence of south Texas would have a safer and less hectic means of transportation, making the experience of traveling more enjoyable. In addition, currently the only means of evacuation in the event of a natural disaster is solely by vehicle. This sole means of evacuation creates limitations on the general population, placing a great strain on buses, and personally owned vehicles; if you are without, how do you leave? Therefore, adding a passenger train would help alleviate any problems to these solutions, providing basic train evacuation for the elderly, sick, handicapped, or those without vehicles. 

Davis Tori Please add more passenger rail for Texas, especially commuter rail in cities. Davis Phillip We desperately need high speed passenger and freight rail service in Texas. The illfated TTC project placed too much emphasis on highway and truck and needed more 

focus on mass transit and freight rail service. Build the rail and get the 18 wheelers off 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments my Interstates, please! 

Davis Dale This is the dumbest idea I've heard of lately. No way will it ever be economically 

feasible. TxDOT already complains about insufficient funds to maintain our roads, and now wants to spend billions on a high-speed rail project? You already waste more than enough of our tax dollars on senseless projects, like small-town airports, etc. Read my lips: No New Taxes!! Concentrate on roads!! 

Day Daniel If this happens, that's great and even better if my bicycle can come along free of 

charge. I'm not expecting anything to happen with this project which is a tragedy to 

the welfare of Texas. 

de la Cruz Adriana I believe a passenger rail system would greatly benefit South Texas. As a frequent 

traveler, I have had the opportunity to travel by train to Fort Worth, Texas via Amtrak. It is a slower means of travel but for a person on a budget it is a great option. The ride is actually comfortable and scenic. 

de la Cruz Adriana The only drawback that I saw as to my experience traveling by train is that there is no 

passenger rail system in Laredo, Texas. A small trip to San Antonio, Texas was necessary to catch the train. It would be convenient for Laredo to obtain a passenger rail system since it does get a vast amount of travelers from Mexico and other parts of Texas. I just wonder how will this affect the community in taxes and the environment? Is there a planned route? 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

De La Rosa David Would really be nice for it to run from Oklahoma to Brownsville Texas. If it went all 

the way down to the border, I feel there would be lots more passengers on it. Right now there is many bus lines going down to the Rio Grande Valley and in the past years many accidents causing many lives have occurred on these bus lines and also in personal cars. I think these trains would get lots of cars of the interstates especially with all the traffic in Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio. I would definitely take it down to the Rio Grande Valley. 

De La Rosa Mary I think the high speed railway system in South Texas would benefit many families 

who wish to travel without having the hassle of all the training commuting along our interstate. It has become so dangerous to travel on the road especially on IH-35. There have been several times I have wanted to travel with my (6) grandchildren but I do not wish to expose to that dangerous interstate. I also want them to experience how wonderful is to travel on the train. I have memories of traveling with my grandparents when I was a little girl. I hope you consider us here in Laredo, Texas where I live. 

Dean Peggy I am in favor of rail service as an alternative to cars on the highway. More efficient, 

safer, more convenient, less air pollution, less noise 

DeHoyos Arminda I really hope that Laredo gets a passenger train. This would bring a lot of people in to 

Laredo and increase revenue. I remember when I lived in California, I would take the Am Track train from San Diego to Los Angeles daily back and forth without having to worry about feeling tired or sleepy on the road. There are times I would like to go to San Antonio and not drive but I would hate to take the bus since they tend to get really crowded. A two story train like the Amtrak train would be perfect for Laredo 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Demarest Stephni M. High speed rail in Texas would be a great benefit to reduce traffic on IH35. The 

resulting reduction in cars on the road would improve air quality. Thank you for your consideration. 

DeMartinis Melanie I would like to see more rail options available in Texas, both inter-city, intra-city, and 

inter-state. I would like to see the plan for rail transportation between Oklahoma City and South Texas come to fruition. Please put me down as in support of this plan. 

Denton Lynn I highly support the addition of passenger/commuter rail from the OKC/South Texas 

corridor. This stretch of IH-35 is well known for the volume of traffic and high rates 

of accidents and injuries. Our current reliance on surface roads is expensive, dangerous and out-dated. Given the predicted population growth in the area, a rail solution will improve mobility, eliminate wasted time/increase productivity for commuters, enhance safety with reduced vehicle usage and thereby improve air and water quality for the region. 

DeRousie Lilia I think the railroad will help to minimize the traffic. Regarding wildlife and wetlands, 

our area is very rich on birding and nature, is that going to be affected? If it does 

please keep it to a minimum. 

DeRousie Lilia Maybe not too much noise at night? also please keep it to the minimum. Out of than 

that I think the railroad is a great means of transportation, please keep it affordable. I am all for it. 

Descant Steven I give full support for the proposed passenger rail line running out of Laredo, Texas. 

We need alternative means of transportation in Texas to cut traffic, accidents, accident fatalities, commute times, and pollution. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Detrich Rosalind I am very much in favor of a faster rail system from OKC to Texas. I have ridden on 

the Heartland Flyer numerous times and always appreciated having that option. Public transportation options are very important and I hope that this faster option will be available in the near future. Thanks! 

Devine Jeanne I support the development of high-speed passenger rail service throughout Texas, 

including South Texas. It is an economical, environment-friendly alternative to air 

and highway travel. Given the insufficient funds available to build and maintain our existing highways, passenger rail provides a cost-effective alternative. I hope you will expand high-speed passenger rail service to include our entire state. Thank you for your consideration. 

DiBenedetto Scott I know that government funds are very limited these days, but I am hoping that as a 

society we are smart enough to know that spending some government funds now to create far greater societal benefits in the near future is the right thing to do. Quality rail has so many long term benefits, some quantifiable, some not. Energy consumption is much lower for rail then cars or planes. Environmental (most notably air quality) benefits are numerous. 

DiBenedetto Scott Being able to take a rail trip from OK or North Texas to the beaches of Corpus Christi 

gives an added incentive to visit there instead of driving to the Florida panhandle. Unlike driving, time on a train can be relaxing and/or productive as opposed to stressful. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

DiFalco Chuck You, namely the State of Texas, TxDOT, and all of its contractors and consultants, are 

approaching passenger rail completely backwards. The issue of cost should be the first consideration. I know what your project process involves – throw all that away. Passenger rail should be self-supporting. That should not be just a goal, or even a requirement, but it should be the first requirement. I don’t mean indirect revenues from economic impacts from rail development. "Economic impacts" are just guesses 

about the future at best, and are self-serving dreams at worst. Texas passenger rail should pay for itself directly or it shouldn’t be done, period. And don't play games by saying that operational revenues will exceed expenses if we the taxpayers get stuck with a huge capital cost bill. I don’t want my tax dollars subsidizing another big government project like Texas passenger rail. 

Dikcis Steven It’s about time scheduled rail passenger service is coming to south Texas!! I recently 

was looking into taking an Amtrak train between San Antonio to Austin and back. The Amtrak passenger service schedule is abysmal! As our south Texas population expands (and ages); we'll need another reliable mode of transportation besides automobiles to get to other cities. Your study should also include scheduled rail service from San Antonio to Houston and San Antonio to Corpus Christi as well. Thank you for making this effort a reality. 

Dishaw Ryan Please consider high speed rail for the Texas / Oklahoma area. We need transportation 

alternatives to help alleviate traffic problems. High speed rail would offer a faster, more environmentally friendly alternative to the thousands of people that drive their cars from city to city in Texas and Oklahoma. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Doll Rebecca I would like to see Texas lead the nation into rail transportation already used all over 

the world. 

Domke Jim American life is built around the car, drive-in restaurants, banks, etc. Once you get to 

a location, you need a car to get to friends homes, museums, businesses. I'd like to see system that enables you to get 200+ miles easily and still have access to your car. I think Amtrak offers this to Florida. Imagine being able to relax and read or sleep while you go from Dallas to Houston. We had the system in place a hundred years ago, but instead of building on it, destroyed it. 

Donald Dana This is something that should have happened a long time ago. Texas is way behind on 

giving people any choices for easy affordable alternatives for transportation. 

DONALDSON 

RICHARD Any increased passenger rail in Texas would be a godsend. IH-35 is an overstuffed 

parking lot-a waste of time and resources. 

Dorsey Susan I strongly support all efforts to increase rail services for the transportation of people. 

Highway construction is too costly and slower. 

Douglass Sandra There are many reasons to put in high speed trains. It puts fewer cars on the road. By 

doing this we would reduce possible accidents, improve air quality and reduce the noise. 

Douglass Sandra Not only that if we use the right of ways the state already has, for example: over 

existing highways or train lines, we would not add to the impact to the environment. It would improve the health of the state population, which would cost less tax dollars. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Douglass Sandra Further, the trains would cost the tax payers less. Less repairs to or expanding 

highways, less work on air pollution and noise pollution. Last, it could increase tourism. People would hop on the train for the weekend to coast or visit family or friends. 

Douville Kathryn D I think it's a great idea. Wish we had high speed rail across the country. As long as the 

environmental impact is slight I'm all for it. 

Dowis James Please do what you can to ensure that Texas gets the passenger rail that is needed. 

Austin to OKC, through Dallas, would greatly cut down on the amount of pollution from cars and planes, not to mention save people lots of time and frustration. The NW and NE have invested in passenger rail that has served them very well. We have to look to what our needs are in the future, make responsible decisions now and do what is best for the environment. Now is not the time to think short term. Not on this issue. 

Dowling Pauline I am a winter Texan, I personally travel from New York State to the Rio Grande 

Valley every year. Often many of us from all over the U.S. and Canada, have discussed how much easier rail trail to the valley would be. As we grow older many do not wish to travel by air or to drive the long distances. At this time we can only go by train to San Antonio, then by bus. No one wishing to do that. Many would choose the rail travel if available, as the warm temperatures are better for our health; we would be able to stay for a longer period of time if efficient rail service were available We think this would be a very attractive service to most traveling to the valley.. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Drury Señor Kevin In my humble opinion, the propagation of government-subsidized public 

transportation is an excellent example of an egregious waste of taxpayers’ money. Let the free market system work to our advantage. If these routes are viable, a private company (AMTRAK is a government entity) will develop the system. This will create jobs. Those jobs will generate more taxes. Think of it like privatizing the passenger rail industry AND getting a tax increase without having to work at it. (En mi humilde opinión, la propagación de las subsidiado por el gobierno el transporte público es un excelente ejemplo de una pérdida atroz de dinero de los contribuyentes. Deje que el sistema de libre mercado funciona a nuestro favor. Si estas rutas son viables, una empresa privada (AMTRAK es una entidad gubernamental) desarrollará el sistema. Esto creará puestos de trabajo. Los puestos de trabajo que generará más impuestos. Piense en ello como la privatización del sector ferroviario de pasajeros y conseguir un aumento de los impuestos, sin tener que trabajar en ello.) 

Dubble Scott Please expand rail transportation options in Texas. Trains keep more cars off the road 

and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail 

service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Dube Charles In total support: * Everything to gain in air quality and traffic safety (less cars and less 

highway congestion) * Improves commerce and local economy by joining these metropolitan areas. The biggest concern is the opposing lobby money and influence to 

kill this effort. More than a decade ago, the same "study" was done to bridge Houston to DFW for great reasons. It went NOWHERE. The best thing we can do is to hire 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments government leaders that actually get things done instead of the same self serving lackeys of lobbyists that couldn't care less about "passenger rail" service. 

Simecek Pat My main concern is losing my home to another transportation project. In the early 

1990's it was the bullet train. A few short years ago it was the Trans-Texas corridor. I live within a mile of the proposed routes of these two projects. My mortgage is almost paid in full. I don't want to start over in mortgage payments or looking for a new place to live. 

Simecek Pat The noise factor should be considered as any new transportation projects are noisy 

like the bullet train would have been. 

Simecek Pat I don't want valuable farm land to be taken and paved over. As subdivision grow, we 

are losing more and more land. We need soil, plants, trees, water supplies. We need rural areas for a break between cities. We need the country for refreshment and relaxation, scenery, a change of pace. 

Simecek Pat Realistically, how many people would give up their vehicles for a high-speed 

railway? 

Duffy Anita I think a rail system that does not use fossil fuels would be a great addition to our 

Texas transportation system. Anyone who drives the IH-35 interstate knows what a hazard this is to drivers and the environment. The fumes from the large trucks and cars makes it difficult to breathe for all living animals. Of course I do not expect our Republican state to do anything to improve life. 

Duhon Patricia I think having a high-speed rail system through Texas is a great idea. The traffic 

congestion is getting pretty serious in Central Texas and this would allow more of us 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments to travel longer distances without the gasoline emissions. Removing cars from the highways should improve safety. I would think there would be plenty of open, undeveloped space to put in the railway without causing undue financial harm to small farmers and businesses. 

Durham David R I am writing to show my support and approval of TxDOT’s proposed high speed 

passenger rail system here in Texas. I frequently use the Amtrak traveling between Austin and Fort Worth and found it to be a very valuable alternative to the IH-35 corridor hassle and is very comparable in time. I would love seeing, and I believe it would be dollars very very well spent, to expand and accelerate the passenger train network in Texas with high and/or higher speed rail service...even more frequencies also. However, I would also suggest a route from the Austin area direct to Houston and Galveston as both Hwy 290 and 71 are heavily traveled year round between these two large cities. Also, I would propose a route from Dallas/Fort Worth along the IH20 corridor on into El Paso where a train could meet up with the Sunset Limited out to California...passing through Midland/Odessa and Abilene. Texas is ready for this!! The Amtrak I frequently ride is often full or close to capacity. The Amtrak traveling out west to El Paso is also well utilized and a vital part of many Texans and visitors to Texas transportation system. PLEASE proceed at all speed with this project. 

Eddins brad We will use rail long after gasoline is unaffordable for private car and private truck 

transport. Let's build it ASAP! 

Eldevik Randi Several times over the years, I have traveled by train back and forth between 

Oklahoma City and various points in Texas; I would like to be able to continue traveling this way. I am very much in favor of passenger rail service between 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Oklahoma City and Texas. I often go to Dallas, Fort Worth, and Austin. 

Elkins Helen I support the plan to expand rail service in Texas. As our highways become more 

congested, fast passenger rail service would do a great deal to remove vehicles from 

our highways. Fewer cars on the highways would reduce emissions and improve air quality, while also improving traffic safety. 

Ellis Jennifer I am writing to register my support for moving forward on Passenger rail from 

Oklahoma City to South Texas. As populations continue to increase exponentially in Texas, we need more and better transportation options. Having rail service that stretched the state would help with traffic congestion, air quality concerns, and offer Texans a great new option for traversing the state-- one that is better for individuals and the state as a whole than continuing to rely so heavily on cars and planes for our transportation options. Please help bring Texas forward into the 21st century concerning transportation options by installing passenger rail from Texas' head to toe. Thanks for your consideration of my comments. 

Enders Sandra Alleviate traffic congestion thus reducing gas consumption English Rick It is time that the Southwest begins to lead in environmental matters that will effect 

generations to come. One way is to push for increased rail options for transportation. Major cities like Dallas and Houston must continue to add more light rail to their transportation mix while the region as a whole must add rail BETWEEN major hubs. While our density is not as significant as the Northeast corridor, the "L" shaped corridor from Tulsa through OKC, Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, and over to Houston 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments and New Orleans can sustain vastly increased rail. 

Estrada-Berg Brenda Any modern, advanced metropolitan areas have high speed rail (electric). I have 

ridden on trains from Venice to Rome, Nagoya to Tokyo, plus the train from San Antonio to Fort Worth. It's laughable. Do we have to stay in our 3rd world condition 

in this area of growth? 

Etheredge Caleb Rail can take Texas farther. Roads alone cannot serve all our travel needs--now or in 

the future. As our population grows, our economy demands more transportation options. And based on the financial success of the nation's highest speed train routes, 

Amtrak's Acela service, passenger rail service is a better public investment than building more highways. Please add more rail options. They have to be well planned and high quality though or else they will be underutilized. LSTAR should be a no brainer. My major concern is land use and the future planning of cities. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. New rail stations can help revive the small towns in Texas that used to have bustling city squares but are now left to decay. This should be the way forward for city planning. Thank you. 

Eubanks Earl I think that this is something that we've needed for years. Hi-speed rail would help tie 

smaller towns together without building more and bigger hi-ways. There would also need to have better local public transportation. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Evans Carrie I wholeheartedly support Texas-Oklahoma rail service!!!!!!!!! 

•Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. •A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. •South Texas has no passenger rail service. •The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers •Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. •Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Everett Tina Railways offer an alternative to travel and vacationing that would be a great addition 

to Corpus Christi. 

Fahrenthold Pat Please increase passenger train service in South Texas. Farnsworth Robert This Preliminary Feasibility Study recommends six regional passenger rail corridors 

for further development and implementation (listed and discussed below). All six corridors are identified with at least one of the state’s four major metropolitan areas of Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston San Antonio, and Austin. Significant large traffic generators exist along each corridor, and highway and airline traffic between and among the points reflects the high level of travel demand present. Furthermore, existing rail infrastructure within the corridors lessens the complexity and cost of project implementation. Earlier studies for feasibility of the three legs that make up the “Texas Triangle” (DFW-Houston-San Antonio) were completed in the 1990s, that is 15 years ago, and those studies then indicated the feasibility of such service. Given the exponential growth rates within the Triangle since those studies were completed, and given the changed state of the nation’s fuel situation, there is every reason to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments believe that those findings remain valid. Regional rail implementation will require close cooperation with the current owners of the rights-of-way in order to reach agreement on the amount of consideration allowed the owners. Since all the freight rail routes already are operating at or near capacity, the introduction of the additional regional rail traffic will likely be the tipping point in traffic to force the needed improvements. Not the least factor is increasing track capacity by the installation of double track, where necessary, new and extended sidings, and updated signal systems. 

Farnsworth Robert Recommended regional rail frequencies on these selected corridors is three to five 

trains in each direction daily. Train speeds should allow for an initial average corridor speed, including stops, of not less than 50 mph, and eventually increasing to an average speed of 60 mph on most routes. In order to attain such average speeds, the 

track must be maintained to an allowable speed of 79 mph. Trains would consist of a single locomotive and at least two passenger cars, one of which would be a control car to enable push-pull operations of the trains, obviating the requirement to turn the trains at each terminus. It seems prudent that all trains into and through Dallas and Fort Worth be given access to DFW International Airport, as the regional service will supplement the regional airline services to the smaller local and regional airports, and it will provide transportation alternatives to travelers who do not live within proximity of any airport. Often overlooked as a factor in earlier studies, however, is that the regional rail service will attract people who are traveling to and between intermediate points on the system in addition to the end point to end point travel often assumed. This omission was a primary flaw of the Texas High Speed rail project’s ridership projections. A. Dallas-Fort Worth – Waco – Temple – Austin – San Antonio This segment truly is a corridor route, considering the number of significant and, therefore, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments necessary station stops. In addition to the end points, stations would be located along the route at the following locations: • Hillsboro • Waco/McGregor • Temple • Taylor • Round Rock • Austin • San Marcos • New Braunfels/Schertz B. Fort Worth-Dallas – Houston This route is envisaged to be non-stop between the two end points; however, stops could be located in Corsicana or Waxahachie and in Montgomery County or Spring. C. San Antonio – Houston The current Amtrak service on this route stops only at the two named end points. The regional rail service would have stops at the following additional localities: • Seguin • Schulenburg • Columbus • Rosenburg D. Houston – Beaumont-Port Arthur This segment could operate as an extension of the San Antonio – Houston route, Its short length, 83 miles, limits the number of available stops. Liberty would be a plausible site for an intermediate station. In addition, if the route were extended into the State of Louisiana, it could run to Lake 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Charles and Lafayette and even as far as New Orleans. The current Amtrak service of the Sunset Limited is not a factor in the transportation equation in any case. That train operates only three days per week in each direction, and it is often several hours late in arriving at its limited number of stops. 

Farnsworth Robert Texas Regional Rail Service. Preliminary Feasibility Analysis 

I. Purpose of this Preliminary Analysis A. Over the past twenty years numerous, rigorous studies have been completed that addressed the growing population of the State of Texas and that growth’s projected impact on future mobility within the state. At first, almost all of them focused on the increasing congestion of the state’s principal highways, including both the Interstate Highway System and the major federal and state highway system, and how the cost to the individual citizen would be forced to increase as a result of increased fuel consumption, increased time required for travel, and increased pollution mitigation costs. More recently, the studies have begun to look at 

alternatives to the standard remedy of building more and bigger highways, a solution that demonstrably leads to even more highway congestion. The primary alternative to highway travel has evolved to the utilization of the skies, encouraged by the development of jet-powered aircraft and the concomitant reduction in the cost per mile of air travel. Again, this form of travel has witnessed a rapid increase in demand that has resulted in flight traffic congestion at all of the nation’s major airports and limitations placed on the use of existing air corridors by the over-taxed air control system. B. This preliminary study will summarize the findings of the studies that have been completed, many of them by recognized transportation experts. This study will 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments then present a case for the development of a new and aggressive effort to revive and revitalize the passenger rail system within the State of Texas. This study will focus on the demand for regional rail between and among the population centers of Eastern Texas. II. Background Modern transportation policy in the United States was set during the Eisenhower Administration in the early 1950s when Congress committed to construct the 41,000 mile Interstate Highway System, the design based on the President’s observations of the German Autobahn System which linked major cities and regions with high speed, limited access highways. This decision came following the historic role which the American railroads played in mobilizing the nation for its participation in World War II. The subsequent and steady decline of America’s railroads during the 1950s and 1960s can be traced directly to the stepped completion of the Interstate Highway System (IHS) across the nation. That the IHS was the major part of the national transportation policy is demonstrated by the huge and indispensable role played by the federal government: • 95% federal funding to the state highway departments • Federally coordinated system of construction and operations standards • Aggressive funding from the national Congressional body Conversely, federal financial and tax reporting regulations stymied new investments in rail infrastructure through the replacement-betterment accounting rules that severely restricted tax expensing of new construction to only replacing in-kind. “Betterment” construction was required to be amortized over the life of the construction, resulting in major tax penalties relative to foregone tax benefits for such investment. Meanwhile, local tax jurisdictions bled the railroads cash-dry through heavy tax appraisals and assessments, a policy which led inexorably to the systematic abandonment of marginal rail lines 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments and to the railroad companies’ aggressive elimination of “redundant” and “excess” capacity (second, third, fourth mail tracks). Meanwhile, rail traffic declined in actual tonnage as well as in percentage of freight carried—to 30%—while freight carried by trucks not only increased in the volume and percentage of freight carried but also in the volume of high-value freight. Concurrently with this radical change in freight mode choice, more and more people were choosing to travel longer distances by automobile on the IHS while eschewing travel by passenger rail. Mail contracts on passenger trains helped to support otherwise losing passenger operations until Congress chose to move postal contracts to the fledgling airline industry in late 1967. The subsequent decline in rail passenger service, which was greatly frustrated by federal Interstate Commerce Commission rules governing fares and route maintenance finally culminated in the federally mandated formation of the National Rail Passenger Corporation, better known as “Railpax.” Activated on May 1, 1971, “Amtrak.” —as the new system was and continues to be known—assumed the ownership and operation of the national rail passenger system, the participating rail carriers to “buy into” the new system with a cash payment. Five carriers chose not to participate for individual reasons: the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad; the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad; Southern Railroad; Georgia Railroad; and Chicago, South Shore and South Bend. They were required to continue existing passenger operations until January 1, 1975. Thus, the Quad Cities Rocket and the Peoria Rocket continued to race and/or crawl into Chicago, and the Rio Grande Zephyr continued to operate west of Denver. How did the birth of Amtrak affect passenger rail service in Texas? The following trains were discontinued on or shortly before May 1,1971: Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad— • #1/2 San Francisco Chief, ran through Wichita, Amarillo and Clovis • #15/16 Texas Chief, ran through Wichita, Gainesville, Fort Worth, Temple, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Houston, and to Galveston • #65/66 Houston to Temple • #75/76 Temple to Clovis • #77/78 Brownwood to San Angelo • #93/94 Amarillo to Lubbock Earlier passenger train discontinuances included: Fort Worth and Denver Railroad (Burlington Route)— • #1/2 Texas Zephyr. Denver, Amarillo, Dallas, Houston • #7/8 Denver, Amarillo, Dallas, Houston Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad (Katy)— • #1/2 Texas Special. Kansas City, Dallas, Waco, San Antonio Texas and Pacific Railroad/Missouri Pacific Railroad (Mopac)— • #21/22 “West” Texas Eagle. Fort Worth to El Paso Texas passenger trains that remained in operation under the aegis of Amtrak were— • Texas Chief-Lone Star. Wichita, Oklahoma City, Gainesville, Fort Worth, Temple, Houston • Texas Eagle. St. Louis, Little Rock, Texarkana, Dallas-Fort Worth, McGregor/Waco, Temple, Austin, San Antonio • Sunset. New Orleans, Houston, San Antonio, Del Rio, El Paso, points west The Texas Chief was later discontinued, leaving just the Texas Eagle and the Sunset trains serving the State of Texas. The Texas Eagle operates one train per day in each direction, while the Sunset operates one train in each direction only three days per week. Ironically, the Federal Republic of Germany, the model for super highway construction in the United States, in 1972 decided to place a new emphasis on rail travel, especially in regional and metropolitan areas. Increasing population growth and its accompanying density had led to such a high level of highway congestion whose remedy through the expansion of the highway network was impractical if not 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments insolvable. Concurrently, German, French, and Japanese private-government consortia initiated feasibility and design studies for future high-speed rail systems. The Japanese were the first to inaugurate their system, the Shinkansen, followed by the French TGV and finally by the German ICE systems. It was also about this time that actual engineering and construction plans began to be drawn up for the highspeed rail tunnel which now links France with Great Britain by passing under the English Channel. Below is a map of the current (April 2, 2007) Amtrak System. MAP 1. AMTRAK SYSTEM MAP APRIL 2007 Source Amtrak System Timetable, April 2, 2007 III. Roles of Transportation Modes A. Regional and Long Distance Modal Choices The transportation consumer selects the mode of travel based on personal needs and desires. The business traveler requires speed, reliability, and accessibility to the destination. The special event attendee requires cost effect 

Farnsworth Robert Texas Regional Rail Service. Preliminary Feasibility Analysis 

I. Purpose of this Preliminary Analysis A. Over the past twenty years numerous, rigorous studies have been completed that addressed the growing population of the State of Texas and that growth’s projected impact on future mobility within the state. At first, almost all of them focused on the increasing congestion of the state’s principal highways, including both the Interstate Highway System and the major federal and state highway system, and how the cost to the individual citizen would be forced to increase as a result of increased fuel consumption, increased time required for travel, and increased pollution mitigation costs. More recently, the studies have begun to look at 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments alternatives to the standard remedy of building more and bigger highways, a solution that demonstrably leads to even more highway congestion. The primary alternative to highway travel has evolved to the utilization of the skies, encouraged by the development of jet-powered aircraft and the concomitant reduction in the cost per mile of air travel. Again, this form of travel has witnessed a rapid increase in demand that has resulted in flight traffic congestion at all of the nation’s major airports and limitations placed on the use of existing air corridors by the over-taxed air control system. B. This preliminary study will summarize the findings of the studies that have been completed, many of them by recognized transportation experts. This study will then present a case for the development of a new and aggressive effort to revive and revitalize the passenger rail system within the State of Texas. This study will focus on the demand for regional rail between and among the population centers of Eastern Texas. II. Background Modern transportation policy in the United States was set during the Eisenhower Administration in the early 1950s when Congress committed to construct the 41,000 mile Interstate Highway System, the design based on the President’s observations of the German Autobahn System which linked major cities and regions with high speed, limited access highways. This decision came following the historic role which the American railroads played in mobilizing the nation for its participation in World War II. The subsequent and steady decline of America’s railroads during the 1950s and 1960s can be traced directly to the stepped completion of the Interstate Highway System (IHS) across the nation. That the IHS was the major part of the national transportation policy is demonstrated by the huge and indispensable role played by the federal government: • 95% federal funding to the state highway departments 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments • Federally coordinated system of construction and operations standards • Aggressive funding from the national Congressional body Conversely, federal financial and tax reporting regulations stymied new investments in rail infrastructure through the replacement-betterment accounting rules that severely restricted tax expensing of new construction to only replacing in-kind. “Betterment” construction was required to be amortized over the life of the construction, resulting in major tax penalties relative to foregone tax benefits for such investment. Meanwhile, local tax jurisdictions bled the railroads cash-dry through heavy tax appraisals and assessments, a policy which led inexorably to the systematic abandonment of marginal rail lines and to the railroad companies’ aggressive elimination of “redundant” and “excess” capacity (second, third, fourth mail tracks). Meanwhile, rail traffic declined in actual tonnage as well as in percentage of freight carried—to 30%—while freight carried by trucks not only increased in the volume and percentage of freight carried but also in the volume of high-value freight. Concurrently with this radical change in freight mode choice, more and more people were choosing to travel longer distances by automobile on the IHS while eschewing travel by passenger rail. Mail contracts on passenger trains helped to support otherwise losing passenger operations until Congress chose to move postal contracts to the fledgling airline industry in late 1967. The subsequent decline in rail passenger service, which was greatly frustrated by federal Interstate Commerce Commission rules governing fares and route maintenance finally culminated in the federally mandated formation of the National Rail Passenger Corporation, better known as “Railpax.” Activated on May 1, 1971, “Amtrak.” —as the new system was and continues to be known—assumed the ownership and operation of the national rail passenger system, the participating rail carriers to “buy into” the new system with a cash payment. Five carriers chose not to participate for individual reasons: the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad; the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad; Southern Railroad; Georgia Railroad; and Chicago, South Shore and South Bend. They were required to continue existing passenger operations until January 1, 1975. Thus, the Quad Cities Rocket and the Peoria Rocket continued to race and/or crawl into Chicago, and the Rio Grande Zephyr continued to operate west of Denver. How did the birth of Amtrak affect passenger rail service in Texas? The following trains were discontinued on or shortly before May 1,1971: Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad— • #1/2 San Francisco Chief, ran through Wichita, Amarillo and Clovis • #15/16 Texas Chief, ran through Wichita, Gainesville, Fort Worth, Temple, Houston, and to Galveston • #65/66 Houston to Temple • #75/76 Temple to Clovis • #77/78 Brownwood to San Angelo • #93/94 Amarillo to Lubbock Earlier passenger train discontinuances included: Fort Worth and Denver Railroad (Burlington Route)— • #1/2 Texas Zephyr. Denver, Amarillo, Dallas, Houston • #7/8 Denver, Amarillo, Dallas, Houston Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad (Katy)— • #1/2 Texas Special. Kansas City, Dallas, Waco, San Antonio Texas and Pacific Railroad/Missouri Pacific Railroad (Mopac)— • #21/22 “West” Texas Eagle. Fort Worth to El Paso Texas passenger trains that remained in operation under the aegis of Amtrak were— • Texas Chief-Lone Star. Wichita, Oklahoma City, Gainesville, Fort Worth, Temple, Houston 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments • Texas Eagle. St. Louis, Little Rock, Texarkana, Dallas-Fort Worth, McGregor/Waco, Temple, Austin, San Antonio • Sunset. New Orleans, Houston, San Antonio, Del Rio, El Paso, points west The Texas Chief was later discontinued, leaving just the Texas Eagle and the Sunset trains serving the State of Texas. The Texas Eagle operates one train per day in each direction, while the Sunset operates one train in each direction only three days per week. Ironically, the Federal Republic of Germany, the model for super highway construction in the United States, in 1972 decided to place a new emphasis on rail travel, especially in regional and metropolitan areas. Increasing population growth and its accompanying density had led to such a high level of highway congestion whose remedy through the expansion of the highway network was impractical if not insolvable. Concurrently, German, French, and Japanese private-government consortia initiated feasibility and design studies for future high-speed rail systems. The Japanese were the first to inaugurate their system, the Shinkansen, followed by the French TGV and finally by the German ICE systems. It was also about this time that actual engineering and construction plans began to be drawn up for the highspeed rail tunnel which now links France with Great Britain by passing under the English Channel. Below is a map of the current (April 2, 2007) Amtrak System. MAP 1. AMTRAK SYSTEM MAP APRIL 2007 Source Amtrak System Timetable, April 2, 2007 III. Roles of Transportation Modes A. Regional and Long Distance Modal Choices The transportation consumer selects the mode of travel based on personal needs and desires. The business traveler requires speed, reliability, and accessibility to the destination. The special event 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments attendee requires cost effect 

Favela Janelle It would be wonderful to have an alternative means of transportation. Can't wait for 

the TRE to extend this far! 

Felter Joyce We NEED as much rail service as they have in Europe or on our east coast. Fengel Jordan There needs to be a rail system implemented. As thousands of families and 

individuals continue to move to Texas, there is not the infrastructure to support the traffic. IH35 continues to be overwhelmed and the lack of true thoroughfare is creating additional air quality issues, increased pollution, increased waste in fossil fuels and also traffic takes time away from individuals. Please consider these comments useful towards the granting of a rail system. 

Ferguson Don Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study what a crock of crap! Ferrell Robert G. I believe that high speed rail will greatly improve not only environmental quality, but 

also attract more business to the area as effective and comfortable mass transit of this type is an excellent employee recruiting tool. 

Ferris Cyndi I am in full support of passenger rail in Texas. Safety is a huge issue: highways are 

congested, speed limits are too high, and drivers are distracted with mobile devices. I pledge to use rail instead of the highways. I would be more inclined to travel if Texas had a rail system. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Fertitta Joe I would love to see a high speed passenger train running between the major cities in 

Texas. This would really help reduce the amount of traffic on our already overcrowded Texas highways, which would save money and lives by reducing traffic 

fatalities. In fact, he benefits are many should this become a reality. 

Fisher Jennifer Texas needs a passenger train rail! Let's shift into modern times and get with the 

program. Our state is huge; we've got a large population; we need safety, ease of transportation and community! In my mind there is no good reason we don't already have one. 

Fitzgerald David This would be a great addition to our transportation system. I for one would try and 

use it as much as possible, especially for trips to SA-Austin. It would also be a great 

economic and environmental benefit. Take a look at the Europe train system -- its 

convenient, economical, fun to ride and on time!!! 

Fleming Ryan we need high speed rail. Flores Juan Jaime (1) Is the noise level less or more than a regular train? (2) What are the probabilities 

of an accident? (3) Is there any impact on any type of wildlife? (4) Does it cut across any state park? and (5) Is there any chance that it might come all the way down to the city of McAllen? 

Fonseca Vince I strongly support expanded and higher speed passenger rail service between 

Oklahoma City and South Texas. As a public health physician and the former Texas State Epidemiologist, allowing expansion and improvement in transportation 

(decreasing congestion) while minimizing the impact on health (poor air quality's 

impact on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases) is critical. A health Texas economy 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments requires healthy Texans. 

Ford Jason I fully support any and all improvements to higher-speed passenger rail on existing or 

new lines (please examine current rights of way, such as IH-35, where most people live along anyway, rather than the Katy line) from San Antonio to Dallas. Can't comment on other portions of the line. The current Amtrak service is SLOW. The 90-mile drive from Austin to San Antonio takes THREE HOURS on Amtrak, and times are inconvenient. The 3-hour drive from Austin to Dallas takes SIX HOURS on Amtrak--if you're lucky. It's fun if you're not in a hurry, but not practical from a regular commuter standpoint. 

Ford Jason Also, most importantly, make sure any train line is accessible to bicycles, as in you 

can put your bike on the train. Amtrak allows this on many of its lines in California, for instance, and it draws a lot of passengers. Then if you switch trains in the middle of nowhere on Amtrak, no bikes are allowed (they have to be boxed, which usually harms the bike). 

Foreman Charles I am very much in favor of the proposed passenger rail service. Some questions: 1. 

How much of the operating cost (in percentage) will be paid by passenger revenue and how much by government entities? 2. Would most of the rail line use existing right-of-way? Add parallel, separate tracks? 3. If existing rail infrastructure is used, how will high speed schedules be met? 4. Are there, or will there be, concurrent, 

specific plans to connect "feeder" bus and light rail lines to the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail line? A personal response to me is not necessary if you have this information posted on a website. If so, let me know the website. If not, a response would be appreciated! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Fox Charles Running a passenger rail service from Laredo to Oklahoma City is an excellent idea. 

Us seniors in all of these areas will clearly need such a service to allow us to visit both ends of such a rail service. Costs of train service will better match what most seniors can afford and give opportunities for them to expand their travels and better able to visit family and friends. Please make this process a reality. 

Frackowiak Lisa The traffic around Austin is already badly congested and forecast to only get worse as 

the population grows. High speed rail would be a great option to help with commuting and cutting down on congestion and pollution. It would help the environment and also save Texans time and money for local travel. Expanding the high speed rail to the areas surrounding Austin would help immensely, as this would encourage and facilitate travel from rural areas to the city. 

Fralin Richard My son and I took an Amtrak rail trip from Austin to Los Angeles, then north to San 

Francisco, then Seattle, and return to Austin via Chicago and St. Louis. It was a delightful experience, a chance to meet people and see the world around us without having to focus on driving. Traveling this way saved on gas and CO2, enhanced air quality and water quality, and brought us in touch with the natural world. I've long wished for a national rail system like those in Europe, but this would be at least a step 

in that direction. 

Fruth Roman I'm all for increased passenger rail service not just in Texas but in the entire country 

and in Canada and Mexico. Right now the biggest snag in the Amtrak system is in Chicago; changing trains in Chicago usually requires an expensive overnight stay 

Fry Greg I am for one very interested in rail travel, would love if it would allow me to commute 

from Gainesville to Denton for work. This would save much wear and tear on our 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments vehicles and be much safer. Wondering why you would not schedule a meeting in Gainesville, but have one in Sherman which is not in the impact area? Thank you. 

Fuller Laurie in support of higher speed passenger rail service between Oklahoma City and South 

Texas. I have just moved from Houston to OKC and would use this alternative to driving often. 

Fulton Carol I am in favor of providing passenger rail service between San Antonio and Oklahoma 

City. I try to avoid traveling on IH-35 because the traffic is so heavy and the driving is so unpleasant and dangerous, especially with the many semi-trailers that must travel that route. Two weeks ago I had to go to Austin and chose to travel on IH-35 and noticed many more trucks that appeared to have fracking equipment on them. These trucks are especially dangerous. Their loads are very heavy and the loads are sometimes so wide that they have to have special escort cars. As I get older, I find driving a car in heavy traffic very nerve-wracking. I believe I am still a good driver but many of the younger, more impatient drivers on the road are not, in my opinion, careful drivers. Sometimes they appear to be very distracted with electronic equipment. I believe trains would be a much safer form of transportation, especially as our Texas population ages. 

Funk Justin I think will this would be great. Futrell Linda I would love to see passenger trains come to Texas. I believe it would get some of the 

cars off the Highways. The freeways would be safer with fewer cars.. I am concerned about the condition of our present tracks. Would they need to be updated. How would the cost compare to air fair? 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Gabel Richard What happened to the Texas Triangle? I'm all in favor of a high speed rail between 

the major cities in Texas: Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, and Austin. Also, all in favor of the high speed rail along IH-35 all the way north to Wichita, Kansas, including a stop at Oklahoma City. This is long overdue. The traffic on IH-35 is so congested that it's becoming more and more dangerous to travel this highway. Don't think it's worth the money to invest in this transportation project unless it's going to be high speed rail. People want to get from one place to another fast. 

Gagon Charlene I strongly favor passenger rail development in Texas. There should be service 

between Dallas/Fort Worth and Austin, as well as direct service from Austin to Houston. It is difficult to see why rail service between the major cities in Texas does not already exist. Rail service will bring transportation in our state into the 21st century, be better for the environment, and improve the traffic situation on the dangerous and overused IH-35. 

Gallagher Pat We would ride the train. Did once about 17 years ago. Was great fun. Galvan Ralph Our rail system is still stuck in the fifties and has not advanced. Europe and Asia have 

the latest advances in rails and we have fallen behind, in comparison we are third world in rail systems. Along with our infrastructure, this country is on the verge of stagnating in the 19th century while the world moves in the 21st century. 

Gamble Laurie I would really like to see rail lines between Dallas, Austin, Houston, and San 

Antonio! 

GARCIA GEORGE Shorter, pass. trains are much less noisy. Diesel/electric are much cleaner. Health 

could be aided. Due to the Eagle Ford Shale over the next 20-40 yrs., lots of pass. cars potentially could be eliminated, besides truckers falling asleep and side-swipes and/or 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments head-ons. On any given calendar day, from 4-8 long cargo trains travel from LRD to SAT. WILDLIFE/veg. de minimus or no impact. Wetlands/streams do not exist from Laredo to SAT. Water quality, except for a fuel spill from a Passenger train over a river, would be non-existent. If time for load/unloading were minimal, and cost considerations were not much more than vehicle fuel costs, I would Love to have my Vehicle TRANSPORTED mostly from LRD to SAT, less often to AUS, and rarely to DFW!!! Area of pot. effect: Town Lake in AUS. Big help from SAT to Georgetown, but esp. thru AUS. EIS should be minimized/expedited. 

Garcia Gil G. I rode on the train as a child and I would look forward to traveling via railways again. Garcia Virginia Although I wholeheartedly support the concept of having faster rail between major 

cities in Texas and Oklahoma, I am concerned about the impact to neighboring communities. What changes will they have to endure? What is the usual increase in noise and will there be some kind of protection or barrier? Along the proposed routes, how much of an environmental impact will there be with natural flora and fauna and will this eliminate existing parks/nature/etc. Of course, I am specifically curious about what might happen in Laredo, Texas but I am sure other communities will have similar concerns. I also hope that as decisions are made that the public remain updated and included in what transpires. For me personally, I already travel to San Antonio to drop off or pick up family who takes the Amtrak train to Chicago every once in a while. Leaving from Laredo on passenger rail would be an ideal situation for my nonflying parents who are not willing to take an uncomfortable and slow bus. A passenger train l I don't know how a state sponsored rail system will work in conjunction with Amtrak or existing passenger rail (are there others??) but I would hope there would be some agreement or collaboration. Unfortunately, the Laredo town hall meeting is scheduled for Wednesday and I will not be able to attend I would 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments l appreciate being notified by email of subsequent public meetings. 

Garcia Jonathan I believe this rail system would be very beneficial in reducing traffic in some cities, as 

well as, allowing faster travel times. As a Laredoen, I have always felt that traveling outside of Laredo always takes hours to reach anywhere. San Antonio is 2 hours away, Austin is 4 hours away, Dallas 8 hours away. I feel that more people, including myself, would travel to these locations more if the time to get there wasn't so long. 

Garcia Julie I think this would be a great idea, because the highway are getting so congested. Garcia Rose All for high speed rail. Gard Veronica I support strongly any increase in public transport, especially trains, to link San 

Antonio with its surrounding cities such as Austin, Oklahoma City, Houston and Dallas. Coming from Europe I am so used to plentiful, regular, reasonable and userfriendly transport systems that I am stunned at the lack of such systems in Texas. Driving such huge distances to get anywhere is so counterproductive, expensive and bad for the environment that it is high time Texas took up the challenge of public transport. 

Gardner Cheryl C Passenger rail is one step toward badly needed mass transportation in Texas. Mass 

transport is resource-efficient and has the potential to help air quality, reduce consumption of natural resources used by single-passenger vehicles, and generally 

improve life. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Garland Colleen I support the expansion of rail systems statewide, and I would love to see higher speed 

passenger rail between Oklahoma and south Texas. At the rate the population of Texas is growing and projected to continue growing, our roads cannot support the use that is demanded of them. Rail would provide a viable alternative to our already congested roads, while reducing air pollution. Texas is way behind the curve on mass transit, let's take a step in the right direction! 

Garza Luis As a former resident of a state that had access to mass transit systems 

(Massachusetts), it is very disconcerting to think that the area of Texas I live in has access to almost none. I believe a mass transit rail system from Oklahoma to South Texas would indeed be beneficial to the residents of both states. There's lots of traffic congestion that could be alleviated by having a mass transit system that people could use, as well as allowing those without any form of personal transportation to use a system that will be less costly and more environmentally friendly than buying a car, etc. 

Garza Margie I would just like to take this time to comment on the Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

study. As a resident of the City of Laredo for more than twenty years and a federal public servant, I believe that this project would greatly benefit our area. Laredo is considered the gateway to the United States mainly in part because of its geographical location and Interstate 35 which runs from Laredo, Texas to Duluth, Minnesota. This, in my opinion, makes Laredo the perfect location for a passenger train. As a federal public servant for more than ten years, I have seen first-hand how hundreds of people make their way south to Laredo, Texas from the northern states and, vice versa from Mexico in personally owned vehicles and in passenger commercial buses. As far as in my personal experiences, I can speak for my family in saying that we often travel to San Antonio, Houston, Austin and Dallas on one/two-day trips and have often spoken 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments about the possibilities and advantages of a having a passenger train along IH-35. I highly support this project and hope that it does become a reality. Thanks to the Texas Department of Public Safety for introducing this study and allowing me to comment on this topic. 

Garza Nancy I think the potential of having train service throughout Texas to Oklahoma is fantastic. 

I remember when I was a young child we went on a field trip with the school to Sinton on a train. I would love to be able to go to surrounding places without having to drive or fly. Please do bring the train service back. 

Gaslin Jacob I like the idea of a rail system across Texas, and with the construction of IH-69 going 

on, I would think it would be a great idea that the rail system not only goes to Brownsville, but that the system also goes the McAllen and then connects to Mexico to help create an international passenger rail system that can connect the McAllen metropolitan area to Mexico City and other locations. This rail system can create jobs for the McAllen area and hopefully attract larger corporations to the area where McAllen can finally get a decent skyline for a city that large. 

Gates Tom I believe that passenger train service among these cities as shown on the map would 

be used most of the time if there would be a provision to load my personal automobile onto the train, as we do on the Port Aransas ferry, along with my personal items that would be in the auto. I then could relax as the train delivered me to within fifty or a hundred miles of the destination that I was going to as it appears that the large cities are within that driving range. I would not have to depend on rental cars or other types of transportation after reaching the area I was traveling to. It would be ideal if the passenger trains path would also include Houston as many people from this area travel to specialized medical facilities in that city and taking one`s own automobile 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments would be ideal as well as keeping from being tired due to the stress of driving that distance in that traffic. If you would study the ferry you will find that the loading and unloading of vehicles is very time efficient. I believe most people would endorse this type of service and use it rather than driving long distances on the highways. I know my family and I would. Thanks. 

Gebhardt Anita Rail transportation is the answer to many of our issues -- congestion, pollution, 

economic growth, jobs, and so on. I loved taking the DART train and buses to work when I lived in the suburbs, and taking Amtrak to Chicago once, a number of years ago. Instead of more privately-operated toll roads, why not a modern, fast, efficient rail system? 

Gent Debra I would like to see and would use passenger rail service from Oklahoma to South 

Texas. Thank you. 

Gerhardt Paul Would love to see this rail project take off! Geserick Jonathan The only way I would take high speed rail is if I could take my car on it as well so 

that I would not have to rent a car at my destination. Without being able to take my 

car, I would probably fly instead. 

Geserick Jonathan If I was to take high speed rail, I would like to take my car with me so that I would 

not have to rent one at the destination. Without being able to take my car, I would probably fly instead of taking the high speed rail. 

Gettelman Barbara Please bring us high-speed rail! It would reduce accidents on IH-35 and give an 

economic boost to cities along the route! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

gibbons Gail I support more rail service in Texas, in all of our cities to cut down on car traffic and 

oil/gas dependence. east west corridors as well as north south. 

Gifford Susan Europe has been using train travel as a major method of transportation for many 

years, but the US was developed more as a car based country. Cities like New York use trains regularly for internal movement and for travelling between Boston to DC. These are considered commutes. Living in San Antonio, I would love to see better mass transit and trains are a part of that, but I would also love to visit Dallas and I would prefer to do that without driving... We need a workable transit system here in Texas... 

Gilbertson JoAnn Commuting thru Texas via rail is not only good for tourism economy as riding the rail 

is a destination, in itself it is an adventure, but also improves air quality by implementing the car pooling effect and reducing the carbon of many tourists traveling in separate cars. There does need to be golf cart rental and/or trolley system to get the visitor from train station to destination points and lodging. This is bringing tourists and business travelers into 2013. The proposed rail could run parallel with the Fulton corridor to North Beach. North Beach used to have a train station at Surfside Park and Surfside Park is waiting to be reunited with its history. Surfside park is on the Corpus Christi Beachwalk and next to two of the top 25 attractions in the state of Texas. I support the rail system. 

Gillespie John This is loooooong overdue. Ginsburg Mitchell I commute each day from my home in San Antonio to my job in Austin on the IH 35 

corridor. Traffic has increasingly gotten worse over time. I, and many other commuters, pollute the air with carbon emissions from our cars. We waste important 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments fossil fuels which are in short supply. In addition, the increased traffic slows trucks 

which causes more emissions as the trucks move slower, use more fuel stopping and starting and in general is bad for the environment. A commuter rail line which would connect the south Texas corridor would effectively eliminate the need for commuters 

to drive to and from work each day. High speed rail is efficient, has low carbon emissions and can transport plenty of people with minimal effort. It works in Europe, where travel does not require a car. I would use this high speed rail every day. I lived in Chicago and both my grandfather and my father took the train to downtown every day. To fail to follow through with this plan would be a huge mistake in the long term. Union Pacific has already offered use of its easement to allow this project to move forward. This project will protect the environment, open up traffic on the IH 35 corridor and will make travel to work convenient and consistent. This project is a great idea, and since the easements for the rail lines already exist, the effect on the environment will be minimal in comparison to the damage done now using our only choice, driving. Trains work in Chicago, New York, Atlanta, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and everywhere in Europe and Asia. We are behind on the technology and we need to use all of our efforts to make this rail line a reality. I vote YES for commuter high speed rail as proposed. 

Glenn Mary I am requesting information on how expensive this will be to the riding public and to 

the environment at large. 

Glover Kayla Rail sounds good to me. Goen Steve In regards to rail passenger service in Texas, I am making the following suggestions. 

1. The Heartland Flyer route should be immediately extended north from OKC to at least Newton, KS and possible as far east as Kansas City. This would enable the HF to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments serve points north, especially Wichita, KS and would finally create a connection with Amtrak Trains 3 and 4 (Southwest Chief) to/from Kansas City. For this train to terminate in OKC has always been a wasted opportunity. 2. The Texas Eagle should be changed from a Chicago-San Antonio route, to a Chicago-El Paso route, or perhaps even allow it to terminate in Phoenix. To do this Trains 21 and 22 would need to use the Union Pacific (ex-Texas and Pacific) route west of Fort Worth. This would allow passenger service to serve the following new stops: Weatherford, Ranger, Abilene, Sweetwater, Colorado City, Big Spring, Odessa, Midland, Pecos and perhaps either Van Horn or Sierra Blanca. The Texas Eagle would then make connections with the Sunset Limited at El Paso instead of at San Antonio. Also, since Phoenix no longer has direct Amtrak service into that city, Phoenix is a large enough metropolitan area to possibly warrant the Texas Eagle to operate beyond El Paso and into that city. 3. Because my plan is to have the Texas Eagle operate across Texas on an east-west axis, I am suggesting that the Heartland Flyer be extended south of Fort Worth in order to continue service to Cleburne, McGregor, Temple, Taylor, Austin, San Marcos and San Antonio. This same train could also be extended even further south if operation to Laredo was justified. In addition I would suggest that station stops be added at Krum (a stop for Denton) and at New Braunfels. Yes, I realize that New Braunfels is not that far from either San Antonio and San Marcos, but this entire region is rapidly growing and I feel that New Braunfels would generate enough revenue to justify making it a stop. 4. I would leave the current Sunset Limited (Trains 1 and 2) alone although I would look into adding an experimental stop somewhere between San Antonio and Houston, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments such as at Seguin, Luling or Rosenburg. 5. Both TxDOT and ODOT need to prepare their self for a possible reroute of the Southwest Chief (Amtrak Trains 3 and 4) off of the current Raton Pass line, and onto the BNSF transcon via Amarillo. If this comes to pass I would suggest stops west of Newton, Kansas to be: Wichita, Wellington, Alva, Woodward, Pampa, Amarillo, Hereford, Clovis, Vaughn, Belen. West of Belen both Amtrak and the state of New Mexico will have to decide if they want to maintain service to Albuquerque or not since Albuquerque is not on the BNSF transcon. However there is a large balloon track there which could easily handle the entire train if Amtrak wanted to run the train into ABQ. If not, New Mexico's largest city would be without transcontinental passenger service for the first time since the arrival of the Santa Fe in the 1880's. As you can see my proposal would have the Texas Eagle operate completely across Texas on an east-west axis which would help alleviate traffic off I30 and I20. The Heartland Flyer would then serve all of Texas and Oklahoma on a north-south routing from at least Newton, KS to San Antonio, and would continue to provide service to Central Texas and San Antonio previously offered by the southern portion of the Texas Eagle. I would also consider renaming the Heartland Flyer to something more representative of its new route if this came to pass. The Sunset Limited would remain unchanged. And in the event that the Southwest Chief is rerouted off its current line thru Colorado and northeast New Mexico, the Texas Panhandle would then receive the train which would be the first passenger service to Amarillo and Pampa since the San Francisco Chief was discontinued on May 1, 1971. As for any possible passenger service to the Rio Grande Valley, this could be provided from either San Antonio to Corpus Christi (Robstown) and on to Brownsville (all via the UP) or from Houston (via Bay City). I'm not sure that there would be enough traffic to sustain service to the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments lower Rio Grande Valley but there could be. The other problem is that Corpus Christi is not on the mainline and any train that would directly serve CC and Brownsville would have to make a side trip in and out of Corpus from Odem. Possible stops on this train would be at either Odem, Corpus or Robstown, and at Kingsville, Raymondville, Harlingen and Brownsville. San Benito could also be added if traffic warranted. I would also strongly suggest that some type of Fort Worth-DallasHouston service was re instituted in the future. Either a train that connected with both the Heartland Flyer and Texas Eagle at Fort Worth, or at a minimum a DallasHouston train. The most direct route would be over the BNSF line via Teague. Stops along this route need to be at Waxahachie, Corsicana, Teague, and possibly at Tomball (another fast-growing area). An experimental stop at North Zulch could also be added for nearby Bryan-College Station. The other route would be via the former Southern Pacific line (now UP). Stops on this route could be Ennis, Corsicana, Hearne and College Station. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or want additional feedback. I am a nationally recognized railroad historian and author of eight books featuring the railroads of Texas and the Great Southwest. As such I think I have a good background and knowledge of where Texas needs to direct and maintain any intercity rail passenger traffic. Steve Allen Goen 

Gomez Jasmine Please include Austin Gomez Mary L. We need high speed passenger railway from San Antonio to Austin. The IH35 

freeway has been congested since NAFTA, and it is just getting worse with 1000 people moving to Texas every day. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Gonzales Arturo I strongly support a rail project in Texas. It would help with cutting cost for travel or 

commuting to work. help get to lessen the old model cars off the road that spew pollution into the air. Make travel safer long distances within Texas, possibly lessen sleepy driver accidents. 

Gonzalez Inelda Z. Wildlife/vegetation is of great concern to various areas within Texas. The regulatory 

process is a major area that needs to be included in the final decision. 

Gonzalez Roberto I just wanted to comment on how beneficial it would be to bring passenger rail service 

to Laredo. In my opinion, Laredo is the top candidate for several reasons. One of them is that you are just going to parallel the IH-35 corridor. If the Rio Grande Valley or Corpus Christi is chosen, it would deviate from the original intent of alleviating travel time on the IH-35 corridor. Another reason is that unfortunately, IH-35 does not feel as safe as it used to be. With 18-wheelers reigning king on this interstate, people need an alternative to feel safe when making much needed travel up the corridor. With the Eagle Ford Shale boom, the number of 18-wheelers and other heavy duty drilling vehicles has multiplied many times over on not only IH-35 but on neighboring 

highways and roads. Just a couple of years ago, I reminisced about when I would see the passenger cars next to the old Tex-Mex building in downtown Laredo and when I 

traveled into the interior of Mexico on a passenger train. These thoughts led me to investigate about passenger services. Of course I would have to travel to San Antonio to obtain some sort of passenger train service. Wanting to get on a train, my wife and I traveled to Cedar Park to ride the steam train. It was a good experience, but it would be better if actual rail services were actually available to service travelers. 

Gordon Jeremie I think a high speed rail from Oklahoma City to San Antonio would be fantastic. It 

about time we start getting serious about high speed mass transit along the IH-35 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments corridor. I live in Cedar Park and would ride the high speed rail every time I travel to/from DFW. In the last 5 years I have often delayed trips or added additional travel time to my agenda in order to account for the uncertainties of wrecks or highway shutdowns when I'm on IH-35. There doesn't seem to be any hope for reducing the amount of traffic on IH-35 from Dallas to San Antonio. 

Gorrell Mickey I am a citizen of Oklahoma City and have been a 'super commuter' of Dallas for 2 

years now. I fully support a passenger rail line from OKC to DFW. I would love to have this option. Flying is actually not very time saving in this short of a distance. Driving can be overly time consuming if caught in traffic. I would love the alternative to catch a passenger train. I travel to Dallas weekly and have been for 2 years. 

Gossage Matthew Please expand and support train and rail transit in Texas and Oklahoma. It is better for 

the passengers in giving and alternative to driving and would consume fewer greenhouse gases. 

Gould George Southwest Airlines has a flight from Hobby A/P to Dallas every two hours. Can we 

have a train connection once a day or every other day ? 

Gouwens Sharon I I want an alternative to travel in autos and air that is quick and safe and allows me to 

relax. We have really enjoyed our train travel and find it a more human scale way to get around. 

Graeber Larry I'm encouraged by this new prospect of passenger rail transportation. I'm convinced it 

would be of great advantage to the quality of life for the millions who live in its vicinity. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Graf Georgio I believe that a magnetic monorail service built above/ next to our existing highway/ 

roadway, would be an efficient and attractive architectural aesthetic, cognitive to environmental factors such as less use of ground space. The elevated monorail would be fairly easy to create structurally and easily incorporated at stopping zones along the way. summary: re: monorail service magnetic / solar powered roof panels. Single rail elevated, one directional. It would be efficient, expedient, aesthetically and environmentally sound. It would be utilized by the masses. The monorail track could be easily manipulated into towns and cities by a host building or space. Its directional path could be routed to malls and public transportation areas. This planning process will be the choice mode of future mass transportation. Thank you. 

Graham Joyce M get more cars off the highways! Gray Melinda I fully support the creation of higher speed passenger rail service between Oklahoma 

City and South Texas. Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Green Janis Let rail transportation construction proceed quickly. Gregor Sandra I would love and use expanded rail choices from Austin to major cities in Texas and 

beyond. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Griffith Matt Is this where I request that high speed rail begin construction across Texas? Oh, 

please, yes! Ease of travel between SAT, AUS, DFW, and HOU would allow us to expand residential access and commerce while reducing gas consumption and pollution. We are so behind the more developed countries like Korea, Germany and Japan. We need this to grow. 

Griffith Virginia WE NEED HIGH SPEED RAIL IN TEXAS. The air pollution in the Austin area has 

become critical. We are almost above the cutoff level set by the EPA before they require businesses and municipalities to implement strict and costly policies and manners of business to try and bring these levels down. WE NEED TO KEEP OUR POLLUTION LEVELS BELOW THE CUTOFF POINT SET BY THE EPA. Our small businesses and citizens cannot afford to pay for the changes and higher costs that will be imposed on us if we surpass these pollution levels. In addition, our health will suffer with the high pollution levels. Please be forward thinking and do the right thing for our citizens and our great state. 

Grish Michael I am writing in support of high speed rail transportation in Texas. As our population 

increases, Texans need more effective and efficient transportation options than simply more highways. The idea of building more highways with more lanes is unsatisfactory. Rail makes more sense. Rail uses half the overall energy that cars and airplanes use per passenger. Amtrak's current rail service between Oklahoma City and Fort Worth is considered one of the best in the nation by its customers. Rail stations are more convenient and easier to use than airports. Finally, rail service can improve air quality in Texas by reducing car and airplane usage. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Grohe Andrew L. IH-35 is over-crowded in my estimation, high speed rail has the ability to impact this 

issue. I would travel to Dallas more often if there was high speed rail, it is more comfortable and safer - it may be more cost effective when wear and tear to the auto is considered. 

Grundy Stephan Improving train availability in Texas would be highly beneficial, making travel more 

convenient for many as the price of petrol rises and thus helping to stimulate the state economy 

Guerra Jesus Justo A fast railway system as an additional corridor for mass transit-transport system 

would provide several advantages, conveniences, and security for people using such a 

mode of transport by: 1. Providing a faster, safer, cost-effective and reduction of traffic on an over-burden old infrastructure system that requires too much of our fossil-fuel resources of this country. 2. Allowing to transport patients on a fast-rail way emergency room that can keep patients stable with continuous treatment while in route and allowing medical personnel to be part of that system. 3. Relieve the holiday and vacation traffic congestion. 4. Would require a smaller infrastructure maintenance labor force. 5. The Railway system could be operated by Solar Energy. 6. Such a system could be finance through the markets in wall-street and get the general public to participate in its funding by buying stock/bonds etc. to support this 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments system. 

Guerrero Valerie What city in the Rio Grande Valley will the passenger train stop in? Hopefully 

McAllen?. 

Guinn Jane Please - a high speed rail is the perfect means of travel in Texas. We need it, and from 

conversations with associates around the state - it would be well used. 

Gunnell Keith I am basing my input on more than a decade of using mass transit and POV 

commuting to/from work from Manassas, VA and downtown Washington DC. Also, surface v. air transportation between northern VA and the NYC area. I believe TxDOT would find the Virginia Rail Express (VRE) to be a valuable reference because of the similarity of purpose. Also, I would recommend that TxDOT also contact various media services in the DC area to review an impromptu experiment they conducted comparing cost and impact of surface v. air transportation between DC and NYC. Based on the foregoing, I recommend considering: 1. Frequency of service between the DFW metro area - San Antonio, and DFW metro area -Houston should encourage surface transportation decisions of the public to focus on heavy rail. Why? It seems logical to believe that if a person can move between these major points in minimal time (requires either high-speed rail or limited number of stops). They will arrive at their destination rested and will have the option of getting some work done en route. It would also increase the concept of "Perfect Substitution" between scheduled air carriers and Amtrak or the Texas equivalent to VRE. 2. Creating a surface transportation facility (centralized services) similar the brilliantly designed facility in Fort Worth is also important. What one should avoid 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments are facilities such as the Amtrak facility located in San Antonio. The Sunset Limited Museum is the quality of building that should be used to support rail service...not the current building. Also, the closest available parking for Amtrak customer in San Antonio is located about 7 blocks from the station. This causes a passenger to walk in a high-crime area from the Mariner Garge, underneath US 87/281, past other rundown store fronts before approaching the current facility. At best, the facility and the noticeable lack of supporting services is UNSAT. We have been fortunate not to have anyone injured or killed walking to/from the station. I'm unsure of the crime statistics for this area other than the generalized comments of SAPD officers and the ExpressNews indicating this is a high crime area therefore not safe to walk during the hours of darkness. Should TxDOT decide to impanel citizens for any future projects concerning rail service, I would be delighted offer my support. 

Gunsalus G Let's get the conversation started. Less traffic, less pollution, more efficiency. How 

much is it going to cost? How will it be paid for? 

Guzman Maria It would be wonderful to have a rail system since I travel a lot to the following cities, 

Austin, San Antonio, and Corpus Christi, and Dallas. 

Gwartney Kurt I support a rail line connecting the Oklahoma City metro area to the Texas Gulf Coast 

(Houston and/or Galveston). There are many businesses, tourism, and other economic activities that would be helped if there was reliable and speedy rail service between OKC and Houston, two energy centers, that would be very beneficial. 

Haas Paula I hope that Texas and Oklahoma will move forward with passenger rail -- and I think 

it is critically important for the rail service to extend up through Kansas, to Kansas City, MO. In particular, I hope it comes up through Newton and Strong City, KS. It 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments would be extremely helpful to have passenger rail that would enable me and others here in the Flint Hills of Kansas to travel to Kansas City and down into Oklahoma and Texas without driving our own cars. I think it also would be used by eco-tourists with an interest in the Flint Hills, which is the last stand of the tall-grass prairie in North America. Thank you! 

Hablinski John I find it absolutely unacceptable that our entire nation doesn’t have the best high 

speed passenger rail system in the world instead we rank somewhere below Somalia. Some years back I wanted to travel from Dallas to Houston by train only to learn I would have to go through San Antonio, several hundred miles out of my way. We simply must build a state of the art high speed passenger rail system. If we don’t link our nation together with high speed rail the era of the US being the world’s super power is over. 

Hall Frances Fast and efficient rail service is badly needed in the United States. Europe is way 

ahead of the US in this transportation issue. 

Hallahan Michele Texas deserves a high speed rail - we are already decades behind some of the most 

advanced countries in the world; France for example has had high speed rail since the early 1990s! There are so many benefits to railways, not least the issue of climate change and air quality, as well as reducing congestion on the already jam packed highways. Please consider also: Trains will keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips in TX. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly HALF that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service - this is appallingly underserved. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers! Railroad stations are far more convenient and FAR less stressful than airports and comfortable 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. I travel frequently for work and would happily choose rail travel over planes ANY DAY. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. Trains use less fossil fuel for transport per person than cars or trucks. Train travel is elegant, efficient, environmentally preferable, and builds community in a way that air or road travel does not. 

Hallen Vikki YES! We need rail service! Rail service between Texas cities and TX and other states 

would be wonderful..helping air quality, natural habitats, traffic accidents, road rage! 

San Antonio definitely needs city type rail service and how wonderful would it be to just get on a train SA to Austin for a night or weekend! 

Hamilton Vanston High speed rail would be wonderful, we need more alternatives to automobiles. This 

would get so many people off our roads and put less CO2 in the atmosphere. 

Hamiton Ron I have often thought about using AMTRAK to go to locations between southern 

Texas and Oklahoma, but the current rail system is both too slow and does not run often enough to make using rail feasible. If high speed rail was introduced I would certainly use it. It needs to be not only faster but more frequent. Thank you for considering adding high speed rail. 

Hammett Rafael Texas badly needs a high speed rail across the state. Infrastructure builds economy. 

Invest in Texas' future. 

Hansen Yvonne Rail transport is very likely to improve air quality due to fewer cars and exhausts on 

the highways, thus reducing harm to human health. In addition, fewer cars is likely to result in fewer traffic accidents and fatalities, thus safer than driving cars. The effort, energy, cost, investment, etc., to build more highways is far costlier than rail 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments transport, which might also have the capacity to haul cars for use at the end of a rail journey. Building highways often takes wildlife, wetlands, habitat and more leaving those areas gone forever. Also water quality is far less likely to be tainted by rail building than by highways of which many of various sizes are often built and overbuilt. The process of conducting an EIS reveals the benefits of rail, and the harm from highways and the cars that travel those roads. An EIS indicates most favorable routes thus saving valuable environments and reducing harm to air and water. Should an EIS be adequate and done based on total systems - natural, human, mechanical, etc. - regulations can then be developed that follow the results of an EIS. 

Harlan Jody I am writing to encourage you in the strongest possible language to expand passenger 

rail services between Tulsa/Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth. As the communications director for the Oklahoma Department for Rehabilitation Services, which provides employment and independent living services to more than 92,000 Oklahomans, I am personally aware of barriers to employment created by limited transportation options. Sometimes it's the disability, sometimes it's economic barriers to purchasing and maintaining reliable vehicles, but whatever the reasons, poor public transportation keeps people we know from becoming taxpayers and ending their dependence on disability benefits and social services. In 2002, we did a state-wide needs assessment that showed the greatest barrier of all was transportation between rural towns and the larger cities where Oklahomans with disabilities need to go for employment, medical services, entertainment and other opportunities. Our research also showed at one point that north Texas cities that chose to expand their transportation options with rail made $12 for every $1 they invested. Public transportation is not just for people with disabilities and seniors. it's for all of us. I have been to San Francisco, Washington, D.C., New York, Paris, London, Rome, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Caribbean cities, Mexico, even Dallas-Fort Worth. We need the opportunities for economic development and quality of life in Oklahoma that exist in those cities. Please don't stop at OKC. Include Tulsa. Thank you working to make this dream a reality. 

Harland Josie Why takes it here that long to build Railroads? People coming old and not more able 

to drive, some don't have anybody and what do the going on the Road and bringing herself and others in Danger. Why other Country are able to build Railroad and much 

quicker as here. It's Time to build them for all of us and that less Cars on the Road. 

Harper Pat I used to live in Los Angeles and I left because of the poor air quality. I m looking to 

move again after 12 years because of the poor air quality in the Dallas metro area. It is time to stop pandering to the oil companies and provide good transportation including high speed rail. 

Harper Adrianne We need this in my opinion Harris Sharon A. Please move forward to provide more passenger rail service in the State of Texas. Harris Mike We need light rail in Austin and more Amtrak. Harris June I have used high speed rail to get around in other parts of the world, (Washington DC, 

and Paris). It is a convenient and efficient way to travel. I would love to be able to get from Austin to San Antonio or the DFW area using rail. 

Hart Nancy Passenger rail is only a matter of time...either that or we pave the two 

states...devastating for all living things. People are not going to stop coming to Texas..thus the sooner the better. Let's get enlightened and moving! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Hartman Eddie Rapid Transit Rail will provide a viable option to air travel between the major 

business/cultural centers in Texas and Oklahoma. However, the system should focus on non-stop service between the population areas. Last Summer I wanted to travel from Dallas to San Antonio with my family on Amtrak and the trip was to take 10 hour! That is not a reasonable alternative to car or air travel. 

Hartman Laurie I strongly support a passenger rail system in Texas and Oklahoma. The efficiency in 

travel would greatly increase, and it would reduce both the fossil fuel consumption and pollution levels in the state. Additionally, it would enhance the flora and fauna in the state due to less need for road traffic. Our nation is decades behind others in modernizing and utilizing passenger rail service. Let us all stand together for this, there are so many positive aspects in moving forward with rail service. Thank you. 

Hayes Ken Rail is the most environmentally sound mass transit we can build. It is also the most 

comfortable, especially for the elderly. Amtrak has some serious issues with being on schedule but it is much more comfortable and enjoyable than flying, driving or the bus. If we get rail comparable to what is running in Europe that would be great. 

Hein Russell Unfortunately, I will be traveling and can't be in Sherman to hear the discussion. I 

have been involved in several rail projects over the course of my career. My first 

question is what is this going to do that Amtrak doesn't? Second question is, are you going to use existing track? Based on the answers I would probably have more questions. 

Herbison Katherine I would love to see these proposed rail lines have the capacity to carry bikes (not 

boxed). There are many trails in south Texas that would be great to explore and using the rail system would give cyclists an opportunity to explore them without being tied 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments to where the car is parked or using more expensive transportation systems. I would be very interested in service up to Tulsa, Missouri, and Kansas and increased service to the Dallas area from OKC. These cities are close enough that flying seems ridiculous but the length of the drive itself can be a deterrent. In stating that the idea is to expand along the interstate corridor I am hoping that it would result in minimal unnecessary disturbances to the surrounding human and natural environments. 

Hermitte Marie Trains keep cars off the road and reduce airline trips, thus providing positive 

environmental benefits. Fewer car and air trips improve air quality and reduce noise impacts in communities. Furthermore, traffic congestion and accidents are reduced, as rail is a safer alternative than automotive travel. Additionally, South Texas is not currently served by rail, and this part of the state should be linked to areas farther north. I fully support expanding rail options in Texas. 

Hernandez Eddy E. I would like to request that the TOPRS Committee strongly consider the 

Brownsville/South Padre Island metro area as a destination for the southern rail line. I believe the Brownsville metro area has many advantages: • Existing US rail corridor • Rail lines from Brownsville, TX to Monterrey MX • Passenger air transportation from Brownsville to US and Mexican destinations • Close proximity to a major vacation destination for US and Mexican travelers, South Padre Island. • Coming soon – an Interstate to speed travel to major cities IH-69 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Hernandez Katrisha Texas takes pride in being innovators and trend setters! We need this rail, we want 

this rail for so many reasons. If I had the option of taking a high speed train everywhere I went I would never use my car or fly. We need convenient and reliable public transportation. Building highways is not the answer. TEXAS WANTS RAIL! 

Hernandez Sergio C The Lower Rio Grande Valley is one of the fastest growing areas in the United States. 

The Valley’s population growth requires development of passenger rail towards accommodating future travel demand needs. 

Hernandez Alex Texas desperately needs upgrading its infrastructure and roadways are at the top of 

the list. It is frustrating to know that with so much wide open space in this great state, road travelers are forced into two and three lane bottlenecks every 40 or 50 miles on IH-35 from San Antonio to Dallas. High speed rail should have happened 20 years ago. Anyone with any foresight can see the economic windfall from shortening the distance between Texas' major cities. Texas' potential is measured by its size and we will never live up to our true potential if we do not bring all Texans closer together to interact on so many different levels that a modern transportation system can provide, i.e., economic, trade, personal, pleasure, academic. More importantly, it is now no longer a choice of whether we need to bring in high speed rail. It is a necessity. The unbelievable movement of truck, people, and workers in distant and underdeveloped towns all across our state as a result of the oil fracking boom, scream for desperately needed upgrades and investment in our infrastructure. We should all hope that this resurgent Texas economy can grow because of our infrastructure, and not in spite of it. 

Hernandez Jesus We need rail now! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

HERNANDEZ GLORIA I love the idea of the passenger rail expansion to include Corpus Christi and the Rio 

Grande Valley. My family is in that area and being limited in traveling due to a handicap, this would be a great advantage. I hope my input helps. 

Hersey Rita All of the above will of course need to be studied for the best outcomes. Air travel has 

become a very unpleasant means of travel. 

Hess S. Let Texas step into the 21st century and help ease traffic congestion, the burden of 

road repairs, and use trains: a more environmentally sustainable method of high speed 

travel than air. Trains are incredibly reliable and not subject to as many of the weather vagaries of air travel. Business travelers and students can work while commuting. Seniors who may not wish to drive because of road fatigue and younger people who cannot afford cars and insurance can still get to their destinations using high speed rail. The cost of high speed train service can be mitigated by attaching a parcel/freight car to transmit urgent packages. Revenues for conveying parcels can offset passenger rail fees. Please note support from North Central Texas for high speed rail! 

Hickle Karen More passenger rail service in Texas would be a great benefit to the state. Efficient 

rail service between the major cities would help reduce traffic problems and help reduce air pollution. With the population explosion in this state the roads are becoming overcrowded and overused, causing maintenance problems. It is time to change the way Texans think and travel. 

Hilliard John More rail service out of Fort Worth. More destinations and high speed rail between 

OKC and FTW would be wonderful! It's such a busy corridor I believe both states would benefit. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Hips N P I think this would be a wonderful idea and would love to ride the train to Austin and 

San Antonio.....but would not. This is going to be another way for the illegals to get into and across Texas. I do not think it will be safe for us "white" folks to ride. Garland has six or seven buses leaving and arriving all the time from Mexico. Who stops and investigates who is on these buses? This town has become a sanctuary city. Schools are 50% Hispanic (per school district). I think it is more like 80%. Trains would make it easier for these people to get here. Thank you. 

Hobbs Elaine Texas and the United States as a whole, are behind in using high speed rail. We have 

SO MUCH flat land, if you go to other countries, the high speed trains are a way of life. The best way to move a large amount of people efficiently is by rail. We need to catch up to the rest of the world! I am a born and raised Texan from the Panhandle of Texas. We need to get over our love affair with cars and trucks, even though they will always be around. I rode the commuter train in Plano to Dallas and thought that it was awesome! It was also packed!! 

Hochstatter Ryan I fully support the move to make trains a major mode of transportation in Texas and 

Oklahoma. The effects are beneficial and long term: Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no 

passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City 

and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Hoffman Marc Texas should absolutely pursue rail transit between Austin and San Antonio. Actually 

between Dallas and San Antonio would be idea. Traffic along IH-35 has become so congested and of course will only get worse due to the growth in this state. I am sure that there would be many passengers of rail transit who would take advantage of this route. We have taken transit from San Antonio to Dallas with Amtrak and it was not a good experience with many delays and too many stops. Please strongly consider rail transit! 

Holland Joshua I think that the train should stop in Austin. It is rapidly growing and the train could 

serve to help move around a lot of the new residents. 

Holland Martha Every car that can be kept off the road the better the air quality will be. I have Asthma 

and it is a real issue for me and the millions of others who are harmed by the pollution. 

Hornsby Chris High Speed Rail along this corridor is long overdue and should have happened 20 

years ago. 

Hufford Amy My family drives to Dallas from Austin on a regular basis to see my in-laws. Almost 

every time we are on IH-35, we see at least one accident that has occurred and is backing up traffic. As we pass the accident scenes, I am always grateful that my family is not involved. Accidents at these speeds typically have injuries or deaths. Driving IH-35 on or around a weekend between Austin and Dallas feels like you are taking your life in your hands. We would strongly prefer to ride a fast, reliable train to Dallas. We would probably also visit San Antonio more often as well if there were a fast train to get there and back on the same day. Corpus Christi is also a possible destination for us. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Hunn Clay We desperately need efficient rail connection between DFW and Austin/San Antonio. 

IH-35 is overcrowded and. is dangerous. There is no room for expansion. Rail is 

efficient, better for the environment and ideal for that travel distance. I would definitely use such a service..the sooner the better, I say. And the faster the better, and the more likely people will be to use it. Rail should be central in Texas future transportation planning.. 

Hunt Amy I think High Speed Rail would be an extremely smart project economically as well as 

for the environment. Economically it would spur more tourism when you make cities in Texas easier and faster to get to and you are opening up the commute corridor. Potential employees may be willing to work further away if they can get there faster by rail then they could by car. Environmentally, it, of course, is more fuel efficient and decreases the amount of traffic on the roads. 

Hunt Erin I am strongly in favor of the proposed rail line between Oklahoma City and South 

Texas. As a resident of Dallas, I have never been to Mexico even for a day trip because the drive is too far and flying is too expensive, but a rail line down there would be perfect for day trips. It would be cheaper and much more convenient for passengers, and get more cars off the road, meaning less traffic and better air quality. 

Plus it would increase foot traffic and tourism in the stops along the way. 

Hunter Margery Please, please, please put in high-speed rail to south Texas. We are decades behind 

the rest of the world on this and it is SO BADLY NEEDED!!! 

Hye Marie-Helene We enjoy and use high speed train transportation in Western Europe. It is a safe, 

efficient, fast, low cost way of public transportation. WHY DON'T we have it ALREADY? 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Ingram Marcia We have traveled in Europe many times via high speed rail. It is convenient, 

reasonable and we are able to walk the aisles on long trips. My husband and I support high speed rail in Texas. 

Inman Rob How about high speed rail between Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio? Jackson K. S. I believe high speed rail will be good for Texas. It would cut down on traffic 

congestions and allow for an alternative way to travel. I would like to add for the planners to be aware of the movement of animals in the area where the rails will be constructed. Allow for a route for animals to cross the rail lines without causing an accident, which may be very destructive. 

Jackson Tracy High speed rail will be great for commuting and to ease traffic on 35. Also the rail 

will provide jobs. The high speed train should have limit stops for express service. New rail should be use for high speed service. Existing rail for trains under 100 mph can be use frequent stop along the 35 corridor. Also, high speed rail will provide competition for the airlines. 

Jain Ajay Texas needs high speed rail. Burleson Mickey I believe that Texas is not yet ready for high-speed rail and feel strongly that it would 

be a mistake to invest in a project like this at this time. We have seen in the eastern 

US that the only so-called bullet train has not been the success it was predicted to be. It has not reached the speeds projected for it for various reasons and therefore does not offer the service promised. Riders’ costs are high for the service provided and there are many complaints about it. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Burleson Mickey In my city, Temple, I have noted that a majority of the riders have ties to the military 

at Fort Hood. When we get out of Afghanistan and troop numbers are cut, ridership out of Temple will also be cut. 

Burleson Mickey In regard to environmental damage caused by construction of rails suitable for bullet 

trains, there are many. The last time a route was suggested, one which was supposed to use current routes as much as possible, it was learned that current routes were suitable only for a very short distance. The then proposed route was to run east of the current north-south interstate through the mid-section of the state. This route cut through the Blackland Prairie eco-region, a region known to be the most productive farmland in the state, a region that has no need for irrigation. It is also already the most impacted productive land in the nation, losing more acreage annually to development than any other. 

Burleson Mickey If we are wanting to build high speed rail because of the projected population growth, 

we must keep in mind that there are competing needs for this productive land with the increased population growth. "More" people will need "more" food. Pretty much all of the productive land in the world is already in production. We cannot make the desert grow crops without piping in water that is already scarce and projected to be in great demand as the population grows. To turn a blind eye to this fact would be totally irresponsible. 

Burleson Mickey Blackland Prairie soils are appropriately called vertisols. These soils are known for 

their shrink- swell capacities. When it rains they swell. In droughts they shrink. And in the process they are constantly turning over. This process causes gilgai, locally known as hog wallows or buffalo wallows. Sometimes they form in the shape of long shallow trenches. This property is devastating to road beds, and for a rail to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments accommodate bullet trains, it has to be smooth and flat. No rub-boards or potholes 

allowed. To achieve the kind of foundation needed for this kind of rail, soil must be removed and replaced with rock, the kind that comes from the hill country, the closest source. Not only will the construction of the rails damage the land through which the rail bed is built, it will also severely impact the sites from which the rock is extracted. This is off-site damage that must be calculated into the damage caused by the project. 

Burleson Mickey Hauling the rock over roadways is extremely damaging to existing roads and requires 

costly repairs, another cost that should be factored into the overall cost. 

Burleson Mickey If my understanding is correct, the bullet train is an electric train that requires 

electrical hookups periodically along the way. This means construction of new power lines and adjacent maintenance rights-of-way which damage more land, and require additional construction, adding costs to the project which the public should be informed about and which should not be overlooked when figuring the negative impact of the project. 

Burleson Mickey Construction will undoubtedly impact or destroy precious wetlands and exceedingly 

rare tall-grass prairie remnants. In recent studies the native Blackland Prairie ecosystem was considered the most endangered in the USA. Existing wildlife corridors will be destroyed or severely impacted by the rail bed and required fencing. Wildlife on the Blackland is already in short supply and new intrusions further reduce the populations. 

Burleson Mickey Because of the cost of constructing new, safe crossings, it is likely that there will be a 

limited number of crossings and more county roads dead-ending at the tracks, which will seriously inconvenience rural residents and negatively alter school bus routes. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Burleson Mickey Although the Department has announced that it will study the project in three 

different sections, it must remember that EIS regulations declare that a project cannot be divided into smaller parts to reduce the appearance of the environmental impact. The environmental impact of the whole project must be considered when the decision is made to go ahead with a project. 

Burleson Mickey Thank you for giving me the opportunity to voice my concerns about the project. I 

think it is clear that l oppose the construction of a Bullet Train route at this time, think it is impractical, wasteful, too environmentally destructive and likely to fail. However, l am not opposed to improving our current rails and passenger service. 

Burleson Mickey In California production costs have been far higher than projected and may yet kill the 

project. 

Burleson Mickey We have known failure and much waste despite TxDOT’s recent extensive efforts and 

related extravagant investment devoted to selling the proposed Trans Texas Corridor. 

Burleson Mickey We see the new toll roads not being used nearly as much as projections would 

indicate. We look at the impressive strip of toll booths at the main entrances to these roads - 6 to 8 booths wide across the width of the highway. Until recently, only one booth per side was needed, and now we find that even that has been closed. Apparently the tolls are not productive enough to keep that one booth for each direction's traffic open. 

Burleson Mickey I have read the early studies from the 80's and 90's regarding a proposed thoroughfare 

similar to the TTC, studies done by the Transportation Institute at the University of Texas which predicted how long it would take to drive from Dallas to San Antonio on 

IH-35 by the first decade of the 2000's. They were way off and didn't come close to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments the true situation. I don't see how we can trust the scare tactics of current predictions any more than we could those earlier ones from a similar source. 

Burleson Mickey Many Texans would like the idea of a Bullet Train. It looks so sleek and modern and 

the thought of moving at the proposed speeds at ground level is thrilling. Most of us would want to ride it for the experience...but only once. We Texans love our cars too 

much and like the convenience of having our own car when we get to our destination. 

We are very different from Europeans or Japanese when it comes to our transportation. (Just as different as we are about gun control.) If we're in a big hurry, we're going to take a plane. But, unlike easterners, we're used to long distances between destinations and don't seem to mind long drives. And if we're going to ride the rails we're going to want them to be a bargain, cheaper than paying for our auto’s gas. 

Burleson Mickey I just don't think the Bullet Train will fly with Texans. We don't want to pay for a 

boondoggle 

Burleson Mickey In the current economy I think we ought to start out with a smaller investment. It 

won't hurt to update, enhance and promote train travel on our current rails. Improve the rails. Where they're rough, make them smooth. Improve the comforts and service provided on our current passenger trains, improve the restrooms and dining facilities, 

and increase the number of passenger trains running. Provide better services for vacation travelers with layovers in quaint cities and towns along the way, investments in these towns to provide appealing attractions, and informational brochures about what's to see along the way. Promote package trips to appeal to various interest 

groups.... If train travel catches on in Texas, then we can think about a bullet train. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Burleson Mickey At our scoping meeting the figure we were given for the current annual ridership in 

Texas on Amtrak was not encouragingly high, but it was almost double the actual ridership because Amtrak counts each boarding of the train and each exiting separately; so in most cases each rider is counted twice – once when he embarks and once when he departs. This is not the case only when a rider boards in one state and departs in another. The quoted figure should not be considered when decisions are made. Projected ridership is too important an issue in a decision of whether to go forward with a bullet train plan. 

Jaudzemis Thomas My wife and I frequently drive from far south Texas to points north, and the northsouth interstate is a MESS. We would love to be able to take a train to San Antonio, 

Austin, or Dallas / Fort Worth. It would be safer, less stressful, and more 

environmentally responsible. It would allow us to improve our quality of life because we would be able to enjoy cultural events, entertainment and sports not available in our area. and on the occasions we did drive it might help reduce some of the awful traffic between San Antonio and Dallas (the worst is around Austin). 

Jay Please ensure that the quality of life of citizens of both states is not unduly affected by 

construction. 

Jean Terry It would be great to use the rail from Waco to Dallas or Waco to Austin as I do these 

trips a lot for business and pleasure, not to have wear on my car and not to be put into traffic and dangers on I 35. Also I feel much environmentally safer! 

Jeansonne Sarah My extended family and I FULLY support high speed rail. We use the Amtrak to Fort 

Worth, and would be happy to avoid IH-35 forever. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Jeske Tim Hello, I am a proponent of passenger rail in Texas. It can be a great alternative to IH35, if it is done properly. The current Amtrak service goes through the Waco area but 

there are several things that make it unattractive to me and my young family of three. The first issue I have with Amtrak is the schedule. Currently, service only runs once per day and that is around 11am. We prefer to go to Dallas or Austin for leisure but cannot use Amtrak as a feasible means of transportation. The second issue I have with Amtrak is reliability. The current service is not known for its timeliness, if we were to ride Amtrak we need to know the service will be there if we ride it. Therefore, I urge 

this study to recommend the following. First, have the service with multiple trains. Flexibility is key for us so having the opportunity to catch multiple trains at different times is crucial. Second, make the tickets competitive with the cost of driving to the destination. Like most Central Texans we will drive if it’s cheaper and we love our trucks. Thanks for your time. 

Jimenez Anna I would like to see passenger train service for Laredo, Texas. It would provide an 

alternate mode of transportation and I believe it would be a great success. 

JOHANSSON DAVID Having been fortunate to travel abroad extensively, it is very clear that a modern, fast, 

safe, and reliable passenger and freight rail system is essential for building commerce and relieving traffic congestion. I am an Austin Metrorail user and fan, and I strongly support high speed rail development as a Texas taxpayer. 

Johnson Mark I believe that high speed rail is essential to transportation in Texas and Oklahoma, 

especially as it relates to business in each states. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Johnston Elise I believe that given adequate rail service that more people from Texas and Oklahoma 

would "ride the rails". The use of automobiles will always be a part of the landscape, but for longer journeys rail travel is a palatable, economical, alternative. 

Johnston Bonnie I'm strongly in favor of seeing high-speed rail connect Houston, Austin, Dallas, and 

San Antonio. Ideally, it would be great if there was a train from College Station to each of these cities. 

Jones Larry It’s about time I would use it instead of planes or vehicles if high speed. I have been 

on then in the. East and are great quite forms of moving people. 

Joseph Maggi Trains reduce car and short plane ride traffic improving air quality and reducing 

congestion on roads. Trains consume less energy. South Texas has no passenger rail service and would greatly benefit from comfortable rail cars that make it possible to work while travelling or just enjoy a relaxing ride. 

Kahler Harvey My first-hand experience with Texas rail passenger service is limited to a trip from 

Chicago to Dallas/Fort Worth on the Eagle a decade ago. I had experience with rail passenger service in Northwest Indiana as a regional planner, dealing with the Cardinal/Hoosier State and the Valparaiso - Chicago commuter service in the 1980s among other responsibilities. Being a rail passenger advocate in my retirement, I've 

gone over the aerial photos to get a sense of the curvature and speed restrictions that would be faced; and I looked up the city and county populations at likely stations on 

these corridors. Oklahoma City to Dallas/Fort Worth A successful start-up with the Heartland Flyer provides a core around which expansion can be implemented. Hopefully, Kansas will join Oklahoma and Texas with a Kansas City - Oklahoma City 

- Dallas/Fort Worth train to complement the Heartland Flyer. Dallas/Fort Worth - 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Waco - Austin - San Antonio This seems to me to be the highest-priority intra-state corridor with an extension of the Heartland Flyer and at least two additional daily round trips. San Antonio to Rio Grande Valley / Corpus Christi / Laredo Service to the populous (Lower) Rio Grande Valley, McAllen/Harlingen area, gets awkward in not serving Corpus Christi directly. Robstown and Sinton are about ten mile west and northwest. The Rio Grande Valley with more population would seem to be a greater priority than Laredo. At least one round trip could be provided by extending one of the Dallas/Fort Worth - San Antonio daily round trips and another could be provided between San Antonio and the Rio Grande Valley. I'm surprised that Dallas/Fort Worth - Houston and San Antonio - Houston, two legs of the Texas Triangle, are not part of the plan. Sufficient intermediate ridership might be generated at Waco and College Station for a daily pair Dallas/Fort Worth - Houston round trips. Similarly, a San Antonio - Houston routing for two daily round trips through College Station and Austin would seem to promise success, even if it isn't as short and fast as the current Sunset route. The problem is that the timings at Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio coincide for the respective originations, and the close schedules are inconvenient for a lot of potential riders. Another opportunity may be daily round trips from Austin to Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio complementing the other trains. I am glad that Texas is looking at these corridors with perhaps a more pragmatic eye toward incremental development. I have observed that intermediate cities are crucial for rail corridors. Even if high speed rail is developed between Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio, it is highly desirable that some trains, aided by a stretch of high speed running to be more competitive overall, continue over conventional rail lines to reach outlying destinations such as Oklahoma City and McAllen/Harlingen. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Kallerman Dick YES, high speed passenger rail all over East Texas ASAP! Kaswan Mark Rail has proven to be one of the most energy-efficient and least environmentally 

damaging modes of long-distance travel, compared to auto and air travel. I strongly support the extension of high-speed rail to south Texas. For those of us in the southern tip, hundreds of miles from the nearest large city, it would be immensely helpful to have high-speed rail links to the rest of the state. The savings come on multiple fronts: Reduced cost of travel, increase fuel efficiency, reduced emissions, health benefits from a cleaner environment, reduced traffic on the roads -- the benefits are clear across the board. The presence of existing commercial rail lines along this corridor, which could be upgraded to handle higher-speed passenger service, would reduce the cost of implementing a new service. This would benefit not only the health and wellbeing of south Texas, but would provide an economic boost, as well. 

Katz Kitty L I strongly support bringing high speed rail to Texas. I've read the Texas Department 

of Transportation high speed rail proposal paper on the website and I believe the connections between Dallas to San Antonio, and Austin to Houston with a connection to Bryan/College Station would strongly benefit the economy. Especially between College Station and Houston the connection would allow the already potentially developing Bio-Medical Corridor to reach its potential. Cutting the travel time and eliminating the travel headaches that are already in place and only getting worse in, around, and between these cities will benefit everybody. The traffic in Austin is horrible, I won't even go there anymore unless a solution is found. High speed rail would be the solution. Also when you have event there like South by Southwest, high speed rail would allow people from all over Texas to attend, and have many more alternatives as to where to stay. One issue in that paper that I thought was interesting was that if the high speed rail only went as far as Hempstead in Houston, the rail 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments wasn't potentially profitable immediately. I agree, and I think we need to spend whatever it costs to get the rail connected all the way to downtown. Either elevate the rail lines, or put them where the HOV lanes are now. The paper I read indicated that if the rail went all the way downtown it would be immediately profitable. In my opinion, Hempstead is out in the middle of nowhere. If you brought it to the connection of 610 and 290, I think that's way too far out too. The rail needs to go downtown to work. It should go to the train station where you catch the train to New Orleans. I would be willing to pay more taxes for high speed rail. 

Kauffman Karl High speed rail has so much going for it and would improve quality of life 

exponentially. 

Kauffman Karma I'd like to express my support for high-speed rail in Texas. High-speed rail would 

reduce the number of cars on the road and therefore improve air quality. Also, highspeed rail uses less energy per passenger than car or plane. Plus, there are some really great places to visit in Texas and it would be great to be able to just jump on a train and go visit these places without having to drive for hours first. 

Kaufmann James I support passenger rail travel investment in general, and this project seems a good 

idea. It will help the environment by reducing emissions. It may also facilitate a net reduction in noise pollution by alleviating the need for aviation. 

Kay Philip We need high speed rail to bring us into the 21st century and beyond! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Kaylo Janet I could tick off all the blocks above, as an indication of how many human and 

environmental areas are affected by introducing a high-speed rail between major cities across any State. Extending rail service from Oklahoma to cities in South Texas 

would impact the environment, traffic, wildlife, and definitely fall under 'alternatives' - that is, alternatives to the car industry providing Big Oil with a continuous, unsustainable demand-stream. Some of the benefits for passengers are: Trains are more comfortable than sitting in a car for hours, as well as safer, much more relaxing 

than having to concentrate on driving, and generally are less expensive on an individual's pocket over time, if not in specific gas prices per car for each trip. Rail services would allow travelers to read, talk, TEXT!! and we know how much people love to text - WHILE traveling, which is limited and/or prohibited while driving. Travelers could work on their computers, catch up on reading, and text away to their heart's content. More people could visit family and friends who live in the TX/OK corridor, and more frequently, too. New businesses would spring up as a result of creating a speedy rail system from the North to the South of Texas, including ones we can't even think of yet, that require transporting people from one place to another for real face-time. All developed countries have fast rail service between major cities in 

their countries. Texas is a great place to start setting an example of how this can be done also in the US, even and especially in a massive geographical State such as ours. I and all the people I know in Texas would support a Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail with great enthusiasm. 

Kellman Steven G. South Texas currently lacks efficient, reliable passenger rail service. High-speed train 

service connecting San Antonio with other parts of the state and the nation would be beneficial by reducing congestion on already crowded highways, and minimizing air pollution from automobiles and trucks. By facilitating transportation, it would spur 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments commerce in the region. I urge you to support the development of high-speed rail service in our state. 

Kelly Brandon I would love the ability to travel across both the metroplex and the country via a rail 

system, yet we don't even have a rail from DFW to either Dallas or Fort Worth. That seems absurd. 

Kelly Jill I have a daughter who lives in Norman, OK. I travel frequently from my home in 

Grapevine to Oklahoma City, to Austin, and to San Antonio. This rail is an excellent 

idea, and I fully support its implementation. I'm certain that I would utilize this service regularly. Thank you. 

Kendrick Carolyn Love it! Kester Cheryl How will this affect imminent domain? Killian Dawn I am strongly interested in getting high speed rail connecting DFW, Houston and 

Austin! 

King Dan Anyone who has lived in any country with a real mass transit system realizes the 

advantages of having mass transit and high speed rail. We need to get beyond the 1950's narcissistic, look at me in my own shinny vehicle, self flattery. 

King Ross Any kind of public transportation which is efficient would be a plus in Texas. We 

have way too many roads and highways, which cause many people to have to afford a vehicle to get to work or to anything else. High speed rail seems a good alternative for many who go from OK to TX. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Kinser Shea I would love to see more rail in Texas! The traffic along IH-35 between DFW and 

Austin is atrocious, and adding better rail service along this route would be extremely beneficial for the state. Not only would this improve traffic, but taking cars off the roads would help improve air quality! 

Kirkpatrick Gabriel •Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. 

•A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. •South Texas has no passenger rail service. •The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth 

is ranked best by Amtrak customers •Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. •Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Klein James I am in favor of this project, though I would want to minimize its environmental 

impact. 

Kleinman Susan I believe our traffic problems can be alleviated by providing good alternatives to the 

car, and that people will use the alternative when it is convenient and fast. I understand trains can provide such an alternative. I am concerned about safety in the crowded highways, as well as drivers who are increasingly showing riskier behavior. Also, the air quality is not going to get any better by using the car as the only means of transportation, even as they get cleaner. More highways decreases open space, as well, and they are eyesores usually. Thanks, Susan Kleinman. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Klores Jill The train is a great idea. I would use it from Dallas to Houston. I would urge this to 

move forward, however all of the environmental issues must be carefully considered 

and studied so as to have minimal impact. 

Klugiewicz Ariana It would be so wonderful to be able to take a train from south Texas to northern Texas 

rather than to drive! 

Kohutek Michael Bus companies already serve this area. Why spend monies to study a situation that 

private bus companies are well able to handle? Airlines also provide passenger service. What is the point of rail passenger service in this study's market area? Mobility? What commerce is impeded by the lack of passenger rail service this study is considering? What is the anticipated minimum carrying capacity of each level of services' trains? What is the cost per passenger seat mile of each level of service? (I 

suggest this cost per seat mile be identified by service segment by service level discretely. For example, the cost per seat mile of 3 conventional trains per day between San Antonio and Laredo will likely less than the cost per seat mile of 12 high speed trains per day running on a dedicated right-of-way between Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston.) What is the amount of rail infrastructure investment required by service level by segment? 

Kraemer Stephanie Rail can take Texas farther. Roads alone cannot serve all our travel needs--now or in 

the future. As our population grows, our economy demands more transportation options. 

Krasner Larry I think a high-speed, quiet, environmentally safe train from Dallas to San Antonio 

would be used and become an economic success. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Krawczynski Philip Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study - This would be great. Certainly a step in the 

right direction in my view. I have had the pleasure of traveling across Europe by rail 

and found it to be a wonderful experience. I am sure Texas could continue to build more pavement, I just do not believe that is the answer. We need to move more people at one time, and rail would certainly accomplish that. There are times I would like to travel from Temple to Austin or Dallas for events, but traffic on IH-35 is an obstacle I am not willing to tackle. While I am sure this en devour would be expensive, I think Texas should begin the process now, as an alternative in addition to building more pavement. The processes could be merged together, for cost effectiveness. I would like to see rail built above in the center highway divides. As in Houston rail and passenger cars do not mix well together. Rail lines could then break off into the Park and Ride areas as they have in Houston to help reduce cost of purchasing and building out complete new areas. Ill-regardless of how this process pans out, this is a huge step in the right direction and I would rather see some of my highway funds be placed in the advancement of Texas Rail than just more pavement. 

Kroll Brannon I am in favor of Higher Speed Rail. Give me the opportunity to get from San Antonio 

to Dallas in relatively the same amount of time as by car with a degree of flexibility on travel time. While I would love to have Highest Speed Rail at 200+mph, I realize that building specialized tracks is unrealistic. That said, being able to travel at ~120mph, I can get where I need to go in the amount of time or less that it would take me to drive. I would also recommend stops in Laredo/Corpus/McAllen (branch line), San Antonio, New Braunfels, San Marcos, Austin, Temple, Waco and Dallas. I would also recommend a line going to Houston from San Antonio with the goal of getting there in 3 hours or less. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Kugler Chris Reduce traffic and hopefully pollution. Kuhl Lee Maidana As the state continues to grow, our need for mass transit is critical. Not only do we 

need to meet those needs, we need to do so in a way that will have the least impact on the environment and the species, with the least amount of harm to both. As long as the railway does not impact the environment in any negative manner, I support the railway system. My concern is for the environment and all of its precious species. 

Kuhn Cecilia I am in favor of high speed rail for moving around in Texas. Thank you. Kurtz Kenny There MUST be thorough assessment of likely demand. This has the potential to 

become a boondoggle on the order of Amtrak. 

La Point Peggy I am in strong support of all passenger rail service in Texas. We must move away 

from the single passenger vehicle. High speed rail service between our major cities 

would be an enormous benefit to our state. 

Labatt Laura Moving more people around the State of Texas with fewer cars on the road is an 

important goal for our State. 

Lachner Deanne The train is a much safer way for families with children to travel. Parents can legally 

hold and comfort their children. 

Lacy David For any new rail development to truly meet the public need....it needs to stop in large 

cities along or close to the route. Cities like Waco, Temple, and other similar cities need to have stops on the proposed route. Stopping only at large metro cities will not meet the public demand. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Lamb Johnny What about Sherman area to Dallas, lots of people work in Dallas from this area. Lamberth Michael more passenger rail is ALWAYS better Lamberty Jean I would like to see the availability of rail transportation in TX increase. It is the 

sensible alternative to car and air travel. 

Landry Genest Bicycles are currently more allowed on the Heartland Flyer. If I were able to take my 

bicycle with me, I would defiantly use the train rather than drive to Dallas for weekend excursions. In fact, I would likely travel to Dallas and other Texas Curries much more frequently if I could throw my bicycle on a train with wi-fi available. Having my bicycle with me allows me the freedom of mobility once I arrive at my travel destination 

Langthorn LIZ Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study - We need public transport, but it does 

necessarily need to be only high speed. Better commuter service would be a great start, like more than one time to catch the Heartland Flyer in either direction. 

Lanman Gary I would like to be on record as strongly supporting the expansion of passenger rail in 

all forms to the area for many reasons. Safety is a big reason as over 30,000 people are killed on the nation’s highways each year while the death rate on public transportation is very low. Passenger rail can greatly help air quality by removing many cars off of the roads. When you are considering passenger rail, please consider adding more than one frequency each day and I feel that is very important to having a successful operation. I also believe that connecting major population centers is very important and this system should be connected to Kansas City. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Larkin Kris I would like to see this same study done for Kansas and Oklahoma. There is a great 

need to complete a railroad line from Oklahoma City through Ponca City - Wichita connecting with Kansas City. It would greatly reduce traffic and be much safer for people traveling. 

Laven Hans I favor electric passenger rail service as the most economical and healthful option for 

transportation throughout South and central Texas. 

Lawrence Ben It's about time; we are at the bottom in rail service. It would be good for Texas and 

Oklahoma, but with the people we have in charge you won’t get it done and I hate to say that because we really do need this. Good luck. 

Leach Yvette I want a high speed rail system in Texas. Lebel Marlene This will be beneficial to reduce road traffic and the resulting air pollution. Lednicky Tom I would like to have options when it comes to commuting from Austin to San Marcos 

and New Braunfels. I think commuter rail is cost effective. 

lee Mark More light rail please! Lehman Carl We have friends and relatives in Oklahoma, both Oklahoma City and Tulsa, and 20 

years ago used to frequently drive on IH-35 to visit them. We also used to drive to Austin, Fort Worth, and Dallas. However, for the past 10 years, we have only driven once because of the traffic congestion around Austin, Fort Worth, and Dallas. We have been taking the Amtrak Texas Eagle instead, and find it a great way to avoid the traffic on IH-35. However, the Texas Eagle takes all day to get us to Fort Worth and 

Oklahoma City. A high speed train would be the ideal way for us to travel, and I'm 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments sure or friends and relatives would use a high speed train to come visit us. I think a high speed train connecting San Antonio, Fort Worth, Dallas, and Houston, Texas, plus Oklahoma City, and even Tulsa, Oklahoma, is needed and would be heavily patronized. Thank you for considering the high speed train option, and I hope to see construction start on it in the near future. We will definitely be among the first riders, and would continue to use it frequently. 

Leiva Wendy So many of us are hoping that this passenger rail project will go through! Rail service 

from South Texas to North Texas would be an excellent option to reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality. You've probably seen these same comments from others, but please remember: - Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. - A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. - South Texas has no passenger rail service. - The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers - Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. - Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Lerch Heather I support high speed rail from Oklahoma to Texas because of the benefits to air 

quality as well as to quality of life and convenience. Expansion of the current Heartland Flyer service would create opportunities for more travelers. Oklahomans often vacation in south Texas - particularly locations such as Galveston or Houston - because these are the nearest places we can reach coastal vacation destinations and mega-city attractions (for example, many bands will play in Houston and skip OKC and Tulsa). There is no doubt Okies would be on that train to get to the beach rather than undertaking a long drive. Oklahoma is also on the verge of ozone nonattainment, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments and every little bit helps. More train service equals more awesome. 

Leshin Len I am greatly in favor of the passenger rail extending to Corpus Christi. I would use it 

about once a month to get to Austin or San Antonio, more often during football 

season. 

Leyendecker Carolyn I would like to see the new rail service come to Laredo. Lindsey Nerissa Is this going to be high speed rail like they are proposing in California and already 

have in Europe and other countries in the world? Would people be able to take their 

bikes on the train like in Europe? If so, I think it will be great. I live in Laredo and if given the choice I would prefer to take the train rather than drive. Driving on IH-35 is stressful and can be dangerous, I would enjoy traveling much more if it were by train. 

Linn Jacquelyn I have thought for many years that we need high speed rail service across the nation. 

It needs to be affordable and within reach. 

Llauger Michelle Less cars, less gas consumption by individuals, less corruption by state officials to sell 

our roads to corporations and foreigners. Less cars on the road, less road accidents and deaths. 

Logan T Of course it makes sense to have alternatives. Loggins Most Rev. DJ Rail would be an excellent idea for Texas, as well as the nation. Many other countries 

who are our National Allies, have thriving rail systems. England/Great Britain, Germany, and India just to name a couple. We could learn much by their example. 

Londos Skip Friends, I write to express several concerns, all centered around lessening our 

collective dependence on autos and fossil fuels for transportation. Texas needs to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments expand alternative modes of transportation for safety, health, social, environmental and moral reasons. Please consider the following suggestions: * More and improved rail transport -- high speed and otherwise * Lower traffic speeds within municipalities to increase safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers * More sidewalks in all municipalities, especially near schools, bus stops, and other pedestrian sensitive areas. Thank you! 

Long Cheri I would like to have high speed trains in Texas...actually a train that went from 

Toronto all the way to Mexico City would have so many customers it would surprise the investors I think. Just getting around the state and to Oklahoma would be nice. 

LOPEZ THOMAS Increased rail transport will decrease environmental and safety issues related to 

excessive automobile traffic. 

Lopez Mario A. I live in the Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV). The LRGV has a large population. 

However, I often feel isolated from the rest of Texas, because the LRGV is hundreds 

of miles away from other large population centers. For those of us who live in the LRGV, travelling to San Antonio, Austin, or Houston usually means driving long distances in our cars. I go to Houston or San Antonio several times every year, and I would like to be able to ride a train to get there. I usually enjoy driving, but it would be nice to be able to ride a train to avoid crowded highways where traffic accidents 

can happen too easily. If Texas does decide to link the LRGV with the rest of the state by passenger rail, I believe that the trains will be very well utilized. Studying the environmental impacts of new railroad construction is important. However, I believe 

that the overall effect of passenger rail on the environment will be positive, mainly by contributing to improved air quality. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Lopez Edna How is Austin going to adjust to the high migration that the city is experiencing? 

Traffic is very slow in southwest (examples: the Y, Brodie Lane) where hundreds of families live and need to commute each day. On this side of town, the offer of housing 

is very limited and points towards development heading to Dripping Springs, and Highway 290 West is quite congested already once it reaches the Y, it only has 2 lanes. 

Loverde Judy Train travel in our state should be enhanced as soon as possible. With a senior-citizen 

booming population, more and more citizens will take to the roads and I am afraid this is not good because of the huge traffic and congestion situations that I have seen and experienced now since right before the Eagle Ford Shale Business. It is only getting worse. A safe and viable railroad for passengers throughout Texas is a great idea and its time has come. Please hasten to get this going and available. Tourism and business will prosper immensely all along the way. 

Lucas Quentin Reduce the number of cars on the street. Reduce air pollution. Read a book while on 

the train. Not have a car and insurance. Save money. Austin is going to continue to grow we need to support that growth with an intelligent transportation system. 

Luce Lila What a welcome piece of news, to think that we might be seeing an expansion of 

passenger railway service in southern Texas! Here, we would welcome another way to get around, besides car, plane and bus. I wish that I could hop on a train, as I could in the northeast, to travel between Austin and Corpus to visit family. We have experimented with the available bus service, not adequate, and the planes are inconvenient and expensive, driving is long and tiring. We would welcome a good 

train service. Personally, I would much rather be on a train, than drive a car, because I would be able to do other things, like read a book, work on the computer, and play 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments games with my children. In more general terms, I would welcome the many ways in which trains would be better for the overall Texas social, human and natural environment. The noise of highways, the killing of wild animals, the use of gas, the pollution of the air, are some of the things that would improve on a general basis. 

Lujan Deidra This would be a great way to get the Texas economy booming even more. A train like 

this would get people to want to spend the day or weekend in their own state. From shopping to sporting events, I know, as a 25 year old, I would be visiting Austin even more so if it made the trip there faster. We need to catch up with all of Europe and start using trains as a way to tour our own beautiful country! Lets ride! 

L'Utt Tyler Paul I am pleased to be able to go anywhere in Dallas and even Denton now by train. The 

more trains, the better. Let's have more please. 

MacAlpine Gordon There are far too many cars on the road, and high-speed rail would go a long way 

toward protecting people, animals, and the environment, as well as conserving fuel and mitigating global warming. 

MacDougal Lorn The mistaken idea that most American transportation should be private is coming 

home to roost in the changes to the climate, the traffic that wastes so much time and energy, the deaths caused by human error and distraction at the wheel, the constant presence of noise, the laziness and aggression of drivers. We are falling behind other societies who have had the foresight to build multipurpose infrastructures. The dependence on the automobile has done damage to the human body which needs to move to function optimally; our disastrous health care situation would be mitigated by comprehensive alternative transportation! Children no longer play in the streets or walk/bike to school in fear of being hit. Most children in America have never been on 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments a train hence its pleasures are unknown to us. I can't express enough how much I hope to see our transportation evolve in the areas of trains, trams, light rail, and bike lanes everywhere as in the Netherlands, along all the major routes and the primary source of movement in the cities. But many people wonder how they'll get around once reaching their destination by train. We need bike sharing programs at every station and throughout towns. That will be true progress, but all is so slow to change except the deleterious effects of our wasteful ways on the environment. 

Mack Linda It would be wonderful to have more fast trains coming through Texas. Maybe one 

could take me straight to my hometown (Indianapolis, IN) without having to traveling the entire country to get there. 

Maduzia David I believe it is in the best interest of the current, as well as future, generations of 

Texans to have a passenger rail system that we can be proud of. Having taken trains in France, Spain, China, as well as on the East Coast of the United States I don't understand why Texas does not have a passenger rail system that is equal or better than any of these places. 

Magill Chad As a local City Councilman, I am very interested in helping Corpus Christi be as 

involved as possible. Please let me know how I and our community can be a part of the discussion - we are very much interested! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Mair Verona We in this area would like to see the Heartland Flyer come from Newton, KS thru 

Ponca City, Ok to connect with the current Oklahoma City route and further. The amount of car and truck traffic on IH-35 is so dangerous and fast the rail would be much safer. Would also cut down on the cost of maintaining the highways. Especially beneficial for older folks needing the hospitals and doctors n the Oklahoma City area. Starting in 1999 I was on a committee to further this route and we even talked with 

the colleges and hospitals and they were willing to supply a shuttle to and from the train station for their patrons. I imagine even the shopping centers would do the same. Please try to get this happening. Thanks, 

Maker Emily I would LOVE to see a rail from TX to Oklahoma! I drive up and down 35 very 

regularly to visit family but would do it more often if there were a rail! Wow! This would be so efficient and very helpful. 

Maldonado Rachel I understand that Texas is a big oil/ gas state. However, it has been proven that in our 

current economy, that people would use public transportation more often if it were more readily available. I am asking this be taken in consideration not only as an environmental issue, but as a social economic issue as well. If people have the means to work and get where they need to be, they will. Thank you. 

Maloff Chalda Trains keep cars off the road, and they are more convenient for travelers than flying or 

driving. 

Manes Thomas I have used passenger rail service between San Marcos and Dallas/Fort Worth several 

times, and it has always been a wonderful experience. It is much more relaxed and less stressful than air travel. The only problems have been occasional long waits due to freight traffic on the same rails, and just the fact that it takes a lot more time in 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments general. The speed of the train is often very slow. The current system would not work for someone on a tight schedule. I've also had problems because of train arrival and departure times, such as when trying to arrange trips from San Marcos to Oklahoma City or Tulsa. This was virtually impossible to schedules, requiring cab rides and hotel stays that would have added considerably to the overall trip expense, plus the fact that there is no service to Tulsa. The only practical solution for a couple of trips from San Marcos to Tulsa was to arrive in Dallas by train, catch a city bus from the train station to Love Field, and fly from there to Tulsa, then catch a bus or cab from the Tulsa airport into the city. Not simple. I've also attempted to arrange a trip from San Marcos to Little Rock, but the late arrival time made it impractical, since I would have had to arrange a rental car due to my final destination being near Fayetteville. 

I'm relieved that TxDOT is considering the expansion of rail and high speed rail service. It's long overdue. I would definitely use this service more if it were available, and to more places, such as the Rio Grande Valley. Thank you. 

Marlett Steve I would not be a regular passenger, but it would be nice if there was were more than 

one departure and one arrival time for Oklahoma City. Especially arrival as the station 

is closed when the train rolls in, so far as I know. 

Marron Patrick We have to manage our resources carefully and at the same time keep in mind our 

quality of life. 

Marsh Jonathan I am in favor of a rail line/system in from Oklahoma through Texas. Marshall Kristine Access to efficient, well-priced rail travel would substantially improve the quality of 

life in Texas. Anyone who has traveled abroad or spent time in the Northeast knows the value of rail travel. Why not make this experience available to millions of Texans, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments too? I heartily support any efforts to create a high-speed rail system that would serve the major metropolitan areas in Texas. Thank you. 

Marshall Ron High speed rail is more energy efficient. Martin Kelly R. Please provide passenger train service from Guthrie, OK to Dallas /Fort Worth and on 

to San Antonio via Waco. This service should be at least twice daily in both directions and operate at 80 -100 mph speeds. The key is service frequency and speeds faster than 70 mph. Take a look at what the IL DOT is doing in the St. Louis to Chicago corridor: in rural areas, train speeds will be 110 mph. 

Martinez Ricardo Great initiative, less people on roads = safer roads, good to our environment, 

opportunity for travel. 

Maschal Tim It's time to bring high speed rail to Texas. Eventually, Texas major highways will run 

out of space for expansion. My family and I would use an efficient rail system to travel around Texas and Oklahoma! 

Maschal Kristi I would support a high speed train for mass transit throughout the state of Texas to 

decrease pollution and improve accessibility. 

Mashek Chris I support passenger rail because the current IH-35 interstate expansion will not 

accommodate the growing needs for transportation. I commute from Belton to Waco every day of work week and this significantly affects my family’s budget. I would use passenger rail if stops could be made between Waco and Belton/Temple area. Room for bicycles onboard the trains would be advantageous. Has there been consideration 

for commercial rail to reduce the high percentage of trucks along IH-35? If so where 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments can I find more information on this? 

Mass Ellen Rail travel is much more relaxing (to me at least) than flying. my biggest concern is 

the cost of the ticket vs. that of flying. Years ago I checked into going from Brownsville to my parents in NW Florida and the cost was prohibitive. it would have cost me almost 4 times as much even with the possibility of taking a bus from Brownsville to the San Antonio station. plus it took 3 times as long. the time wasn't an issue for me but the cost certainly was! Rail travel, if instituted will have to be cost efficient to lower income levels if it is to be utilized. 

Mathis Aaron I support high speed rail as long as the facts demonstrate it a more efficient alternative 

to passenger cars and planes. 

Mattle Amanda I think passenger rail service would be a wonderful alternative to automobile and 

plane travel. Texas' population is growing rapidly and the addition of this service could reduce the number of passenger vehicles on the roadways, leading to reduced air pollution from emissions. It could also reduce the number of short airplane trips while giving commuters and out of town travelers some leisure time on their trip. Trains are also more efficient than cars and planes per passenger, important again due to the growing population. I think that train stations are less of a hassle to navigate than airports, too! I would welcome an Amtrak passenger train service because of its potential to help protect our air quality, reduce our oil usage, and provide more transportation options to Texans. Thank you. 

Maxwell Donna I support the continued development of passenger rail in Texas. We have done a lot in 

the DFW area, but there is much to do across the state and region. Thank you 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Mayfield Teresa J The availability of mass transit over long distances in the state of Texas will help 

reduce traffic and emissions and provide a convenient method of travel that allows passengers time for leisure while in transit. I support the proposed Oklahoma-Texas Passenger Rail Line. 

MaynardMoody Carey Passenger rail offers citizens a transportation alternative that protects the environment, provides for the mobility impaired, enhances work productivity during 

transport time, reduces cost of highway accident response, affords more safety for 

moving people, enhances economic connectivity and work productivity. 

Mayo Judy We have relatives in OK and would certainly use the train for transportation. I am 

concerned at the amount of non-renewable resources used by automobiles - riding together on trains will reduce not only the amount of fuel required, but also the emissions and their effect on human health and environmental climate change. A reduced requirement for new roads will also reduce polluted run-off from impermeable surfaces and will save natural habitat. As you are aware, Texas traffic is often congested and thus dangerous - train use will help to alleviate this problem. I hope that you will pursue building a Texas-Oklahoma passenger rail project. 

McAuley Anita There are so many reasons why Texas should be committed to passenger rail. As the 

major cities in Texas become more and more populated, passenger rail is essential to 

get people in and out of these large major metropolitan areas since the lack of a passenger rail system will rain down so many more environmental issues (i.e. dirty air) and automobile safety issues not to mention the constant need to find more and more precious downtown space for people to park vehicles. Passenger rail is a 21st century solution to ballooning traffic and dirty air that has been held back for way too long. Surely, we have reached a time where it is no longer just needed but absolutely 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments necessary. I know in San Antonio we have had relatively clean air up until just recently. Do we really need to have super dirty air before anything positive is done to deal with it. Please let's get going on these rail projects and we can address these issues, and, as an added benefit, provide jobs for Texans. 

McCaleb Brad I am proposing a possible rail extension from Austin to Houston, through 

Bryan/College Station. As Texas A&M and the school in Austin continue to grow and the Houston, Austin and Bryan/College Station metropolitan areas grow there will be more demand for transportation services directly between these regions. A HSR connection would make travel for business, students, faculty, and other events (SEC and BIG 12 game weekends) much safer and more efficient with a reduced impact on the smaller communities between these regions. When we compare the total project cost for upgrading and maintaining highway facilities, the potential environmental impacts and the ability to move large numbers of people very quickly during natural disaster events, the HSR option becomes very competitive. 

McClain Joseph I am totally in favor of this study and the project. It would have far-reaching positive 

impact on a series of environmental issues, noise, traffic and ease of travel. I wholeheartedly endorse it. 

McClung Larry I would very much like to see high speed passenger rail service in Texas and 

throughout the country, as an alternative to automobile and air travel. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

MacKinnon Kevin We attended the recent Public Open House regarding the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger 

Rail Study held in San Antonio. First, we should note that we are frequent long distance train travelers and have logged more than 25,000 miles on trains across the USA. Our more recent trip, in February, 2013 covered about 3,200 miles from San Antonio and return. 

MacKinnon Kevin Additional train would reduce cars, however, additional waiting time at grave 

crossing. 

MacKinnon Kevin Train travel has less environmental (natural) over cars, additional ROW would be the 

same as adding additional highways or toll roads. See attached letter. 

MacKinnon Kevin Several of our travels have been along a portion of this rail study corridor while 

traveling on Amtrak’s “Texas Eagle”. We have observed an increase in-passengers traveling in both directions over the past 5 years. We believe this increase in ridership is also verified by recent Amtrak data. Our observations of our fellow train passengers would suggest that these folks most likely choose to train travel because they do not have a car or they cannot afford to fly. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

MacKinnon Kevin We believe that the number of passengers will continue to increase as the general 

population ages, and if we take steps to encourage train ridership. Presently, only one train moves north and south each day, which limits options for passengers. While options are available at Fort Worth for other connecting services at the train station, similar options do not exist at other stations along the - corridor. For example, presently, bus service is available from San Antonio to the South, but this service is not available at the train station. Train service east-west at San Antonio is presently restricted to 3 trains per week each-direction. We would suggest adding one daily 

train each direction would help increase train ridership between corridor cities. We would suggest these additional trains should focus-on corridor travel rather than long distance travel. 

MacKinnon Kevin We would also suggest that better coordination between trains and other modes of 

travel at San Antonio and other stations is critically needed to encourage ridership on current corridor trains. We suggest that it is difficult to increase train ridership while we do not have many options at major city stations, such as Austin, where one needs to either have a ride or taxi to leave the station. Clearly, a trip to the State Capital is easier by car than by train, due to the present lack of train options and the connecting transportation. 

MacKinnon Kevin Regarding the type of intercity passenger rail, we would offer these comments for 

consideration. Expanding conventional train service would appear to be the least 

costly, both in term of dollars and environmental impacts. Adding trains by way of “higher speeds” or “high speed” trains would require additional right of way and has the potential of additional negative environmental impact. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

MacKinnon Kevin Thank you for our opportunity to comment on this study. We have also attached your 

“Scoping Comment Form. 

MacKinnon Kevin Additional train options would provide more travel options along the corridor. MacKinnon Kevin Additional trains may provide increased noise and potential for more accidents at 

grade crossing. 

MacKinnon Kevin Could provide for increased tourism in corridor. Agricultural impacts negatively if 

additional trackage is needed. 

McCord Marc W. The need for mass transportation options is critical. The time and cost required to 

build more highways is prohibitive, and the amount of fuel consumed by cars is unsustainable in the near future. Mass rail transit makes sense for a 21st century state. I strongly encourage building the high speed rail line between Oklahoma City and South Texas as a way to reduce air pollution, fossil fuel consumption, traffic congestion and other factors that cost us far too much money and/or threaten our health and safety. 

McCord Lynn I think we need the rail system for our local economy. We cannot afford to delay 

these alternatives any longer. This will increase jobs and would probably attract more 

Corporations to enter our Texas market. I think we should not focus and get clouded by the airline impact because the long term effect far outweighs the short term. 

McCrea Dennis 1) I have lived outside of the United States where rail service is widely available, both 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments on a subway basis and regular inter-city service. 2) The idea of having an economically viable and competitive way of travel here in South Texas is a very attractive and I believe popular means of travel between the metropolitan areas of Texas and beyond. 3) Please pursue this idea to fruition. 

McCullough Chris Please bring a useful rail system to Oklahoma and Texas. As an OKC resident who 

travels to Dallas at least once a month, I know I would use the rail system every time if the times were more accessible. Please consider making this expansion as I know 

from personal experience there is a need for it. I spent 6 months backpacking in Europe and used the rail system the entire time. Incredible stuff. 

McDonald James Please provide additional passenger rail from Oklahoma to South Texas, specifically 

the Austin to DFW corridor. Thank you. 

McFaden Tex Depending on the type of rail, this potential project could reduce the noise and traffic 

in areas, thus improving roadway safety and air quality, especially in the larger cities. 

Any improvement to air quality and reduction in noise and traffic certainly has a positive impact on the natural environment, as well as the longevity and day-to-day conditions of the roadways. As an alternative means of transportation, there is no reason to not look at alternative power sources for the rail engine, to include solar. A 

combination of alternative energy sources could further enhance the positive effects on the environment and save in overall, long-term costs of the railway. 

McFaden Tex The main concern is making the railway affordable so that the average non-traveling 

resident sees it as an opportunity to travel. With the possibility of casinos coming to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Texas, this could rapidly become a booming business venture, especially if it's cheap enough for the local resident to use it for a shopping day in OKC or cities in Texas, or to travel to the casino. Having a partnership of some sort with potential land/casino owners, perhaps a sponsorship (in terms of advertising or building the rail station at the casino or covering the cost of the facility) could truly make this one of the most attractive travel options in America... something that others would envy and emulate. The only people who ever listen to my opinion are the ones who've learned that I'm never wrong, and thus have listened and made a fortune and been blessed with fantastic luck along the way. You don't know me... but I am right about this and hopefully you have people there with the vision to see the same things that I see and to act on those concepts. 

McFaden Tex As a retired, disabled combat veteran, I'm telling what I would do if those options 

existed, and I'm a no-income, reclusive combat veteran. If I'm willing to ride the rail for the right price, then trust me when I say that you would open up the flood gates for millions in DFW alone. Consider this... cheap, fast rail for Mavericks and Thunder fans! The fans alone, for a cheap fare, would pack those local venues every time the two teams faced each other!! Throw in the Spurs... THE COLLEGE GAMES!!!! You have a bonanza staring you in the face... and if you need help with concepts and marketing, feel free to draft me into your organization. I believe this could be one of the most incredible opportunities for these two states, and the local economies. Consider this as well... instead of driving in for the Red River Rivalry, folks take the rail... they use local cabs, shuttles or car rentals for their stay, because the rail was fast and cheap, and they saved the wear and tear on their own vehicle (which may not have made the trip anyway). The positives are endless. Maybe I need to market this idea to other states too! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

McGee Jessica I think the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail is a great idea! I would love to be able to 

have the option of not driving these long distances with the increase of oil tanker trucks invading Hwy 35. My vote is YES!!! 

McGlasson Elizabeth Rail is good. Let’s invest in our future. McIntyre Kellen I am in full support of all proposed additional commuter rail throughout Texas. Rail 

can take Texas farther. Roads alone cannot serve all our travel needs--now or in the future. As our population grows, our economy demands on more transportation options. And based on the financial success of the nation's highest speed train routes, Amtrak's Acela service, passenger rail service is a better public investment than building more highways. Rail makes sound environmental sense. Trains keep cars off the road and reduce the number of short-distance airplane trips. Trains are more efficient, too, since the overall energy consumption per passenger is nearly half that of planes or cars. 

McKaskle Emily I would love to see a high speed rail between Oklahoma and south Texas. I personally 

would use this service for much of my travel around the state in the place of my current travel by plane and automobile. 

McKenzie John I hope the TX-OK rail study moves ahead with the OK City to The Rio Grande Valley 

service. I am from Kingsville. I remember the days when there was passenger service to Laredo/Corpus Christi/ the Rio Grande Valley. The service to Corpus Christi from San Antonio ended in 1962. The service to the Rio Grande Valley ended in April 1966. This was a big loss to the area. People rode the train but the Missouri Pacific wanted out of the passenger business. I do know that the track to the Rio Grande Valley is in good condition. People in this area really want passenger train service. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments The train to the Valley ran from Brownsville- Houston. The train had plenty of riders. It also carried mail. Getting a mail contract should be something to consider when this service comes about since that would be a good source of revenue. I wish this project all the best. We need passenger service. 

McKim Mark Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

McKinney Daphne A TX-OK Passenger Rail is a wonderful idea. People here in Laredo talk about the 

lack of available transportation to other cities. Our airport is so small that direct flights only go to a couple of cities. If a rail was to be built, both residents and visitors would have easier and more affordable access in and out of Laredo. 

McKinney Daphne Working in the entertainment industry, this means that more business could 

potentially come here. Not to mention, travel on IH-35 can be awful. There are so 

many semi-trucks on that highway that not only is safety and issue, but congestion is almost always a result. Also, driving to Corpus Christi is mostly single-lane. People drive onto the shoulder to let people pass. Driving at night is especially unsafe because of all of the passing. 

McManus Sid I support the development of high speed rail in Texas. With a continued growing 

population alternative transportation to cars and planes is vital part of keeping Texas 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments strong economically and environmentally. 

McMurtrey Michael I strongly support the development of high-speed passenger rail in Texas for the 

following reasons: 1. Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. 2. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. 3. South Texas has no passenger rail service. 4. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers 5. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports, and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. 6. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

McPhail Michael I strongly support creating high speed passenger rail between Dallas-Fort Worth and 

San Antonio. As someone who has to travel from Irving to Austin semi-frequently I know first-hand the deplorable condition IH-35 is in. It's guaranteed to get worse as 

time goes on and more and more people move to Texas, as is the air pollution in North Texas. It seems half the children in North Texas have asthma because of the smog caused by car exhaust. The terrible wrecks on our traffic snarled highways just seem to get worse and worse due to traffic. We must get more travelers off the road and onto the rails. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

McPhail Michael Air travel is handy but expensive and not as widely available to all Texans as one 

would hope. Improving existing freight rail lines to maximize the effectiveness and attractiveness of current passenger rail service would create some benefit, true, but it would not be enough to improve travel conditions on that heavily traveled stretch of road enough. 

McPhail Michael The state's research shows there is a market for high speed rail in that area. Therefore 

a high speed rail line between Dallas-Fort Worth and San Antonio makes the most sense. Currently there is not enough travel demand to justify the expense of extending high speed rail service north of Dallas-Fort Worth to Oklahoma City or south of San Antonio to the Mexico border (or even as far away as Monterrey) according to the state's research according to the state's research. The state should work with other governmental entities, though, to re-engineer and update the existing rail lines servicing these communities to maximize the speed of passenger rail service. 

Meador Nancy How will this work if the rail lines are controlled by the freight lines? I know for a 

fact that Amtrak is expected to get off on a side line when there is a freight train coming through, so how will that affect the speed rail? Or are you considering a separate rail lines to be laid exclusive for the speed rail only? If that were the case, then there are environmental issues to consider, human and natural.... 

Medina Gracie I am interested in the potential of the rail system aiding our employees with 

commuting options in support of the Public Transportation Incentive Program. We have employees assigned throughout several areas (Laredo, Cotulla, Hebbronville, Freer, Zapata) that currently reside outside of their duty station, therefore, commute every day. I would like information regarding the proposed route, stopping points, hours of operation, etc. I would also like to know what would be the fare charge per 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments rider to determine if this would be an alternative for our employees to use for their commute. I am the Director of Security, Policy and Compliance with the office of Border Patrol of the Laredo Sector. I am very interested in seeking options for our employees to alleviate their commute and associated costs. I look forward to speaking to someone and interested in attending future meetings. 

Medina Mike There is a need to move many workers to the Eagle Ford areas. from larger cities 

around Cotulla. 

Mein Joen Do we really want to continue building roads all over this state/planet! Everything has 

a limit before systems begin to break down and all life suffers when this happens. High speed rail (as in Europe) is clean, safe, enjoyable, efficient, and a pleasure--I know this from personal use. We should understand by now that we can never build 

enough roads and freeways and why would we want to? Overbuilding of highways, roads, flyovers, etc., divides cities and towns, breaks up neighborhoods, ruins green areas, always being repaired, made larger and larger, and allows drivers to pretty much drive as fast as they please. Too many lives are lost. Period. Let us begin to save land, build fast speed trains, reduce madness on the roads, save lives, and enjoy the scenery and relax with a good book, take a nap, and have a coffee or a good conversation. 

Melcer Scott Light rail is the most effective way to reduce traffic, pollution, and dependence on 

foreign oil. 

Melchor Antonio My idea for this plan would be for my son and his daughter to come to San Antonio 

via rail, this would only require about a two hour drive from Wichita KS to Oklahoma city OK. After that they could do long term parking and travel in Comfort to Texas 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments and arrive safely and not totally exhausted, and save the air from emissions and save cash. 

Meyer Wendy I would love it if we could get to Austin, Houston and San Antonio by high speed rail! 

Planes use up too much fuel and are so uncomfortable any more, and driving on I 35 is way overrated. I used to live in Germany and I miss having a train system that can get you anywhere faster than driving and with a lot less stress. 

Meyers Beth While I admit that I am not updated on all the details of the proposed study, my 

concerns are how it affects the human environment as well as the animal environment. As always, there is a balance and every time we move into new areas, we are flushing out the wildlife that thrives without us. Already we are seeing the results of overdevelopment as the animals scurry for new resources to survive - coming into urban areas. Adding the railway also means that there will be development along the route, particularly around the proposed stops. Also I have concerns on how much more concrete we are adding and how much land we are taking up. I lived in the northeast and rode the subways of New York for many years. It hugely decreased the need for cars, which is something that the DFW area needs to figure out how to do. 

Miciano Jaquelyn The passenger rail is an excellent proposal for the State of Texas. Moving around 

Texas is difficult without private transportation. Most citizens posses their own 

vehicles to get to one point to another. The implementation of a railroad system will as well as result to rerouting bus line routes within a city. With the increasing price of 

gasoline, it is more than likely that the people will choose the option of public transportation thus reducing the fossil fuel consumption from individual vehicles. Having an environment friendly train is also a deep concern within the country. Although the state is rich in crude oil, it is equally important to take into consideration 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments the environmental effects of this proposal. 

Miciano Jaquelyn Aside from everything else, I personally would rather take the train to Dallas for $100 

than an air flight that costs $700 which I find ridiculous. 

Miller Karen Here are the pros to having a passenger railway system: 

•Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. 

•A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. •South Texas has no passenger rail service. •The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers •Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. •Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. I am concerned about the preservation or devastation of the environment and its inhabitants(human and otherwise) along any proposed routes. 

Mills Anita High speed rail in Texas is an opportunity that is late in coming! It has the potential 

not only to reduce auto-based pollution, but also to unclog freeways and thus contribute to improved healthful conditions for all of us. This needs to be pursued! 

Mistry Shilpa Having ridden high speed trains around parts of Europe, I found them to be very 

efficient methods to travel moderate distances without the hassle of driving. This could also be a more affordable method for many people to travel without the inconvenience of airports and expenses of flying. Also, there is the consideration of the effect of removing cars from the road and therefore eliminating the release of 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments some of the greenhouse gas emissions in our state. With the increasing emphasis on climate change, and the continuing push to go green, a high speed train to ease travel through the biggest heavily populated state makes more than enough sense. 

Mock Marilyn Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Moen Robert I represent All Aboard Minnesota, a new grassroots group forming here to promote 

intercity train development. We feel that a conventional speed passenger train route from Minneapolis-Des Moines-Kansas City-Wichita-Oklahoma City-Dallas/Fort Worth-that splits to serve both San Antonia/Austin and Houston is an important missing link in the national train network. There was such a train in the 1960's called the Twin Star Rocket and it was a 12-15 car train that handled substantial business between the Lone Star state and the North Star state, thus the name. We believe that had this train survived into the Amtrak era and been combined with the Amtrak Texas Chief train (operated until 1979) it would still be busy and operating today. The Texas Chief was discontinued for political reasons, not lack of traffic. The traffic on Interstate 35 which parallels this route demonstrates the demand for such service. Such a train would link more city pairs by combining the Minneapolis-Kansas City corridor with the Kansas City-Dallas/Fort Worth corridor along with the Dallas/Fort Worth to San Antonio and Houston corridors. It would get higher ridership and gain economies of scale that would ultimately cost the involved states less than if these 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments corridors were operated separately. Such a train should have companion service that operates on a 12 hour opposite schedule so that Oklahoma would have both daytime and nighttime service. (The nighttime schedule is necessary to connect with the Amtrak east/west transcontinental trains). We urge Oklahoma and Texas to keep such a service in mind as they make plans for passenger rail expansion. 

Monaghan Bernadette Let's join the new century and upgrade the TX transportation system. Mongere Anne I certainly would like high speed rail service to be built in Texas. Mongold Geraldine I totally support the expansion of rail service in Texas. As a life-long Texas resident, I 

have watched the building of more and larger highways which serve only to enable 

more pollution and more vehicular traffic while reducing the livability of our towns and cities. I work as a consultant and many of my colleagues travel extensively between Texas cities for work. Expanded rail service would enable business and leisure travel without a negative impact on our air and the natural beauty of Texas. 

Moon Carolyn I would be delighted to have passenger rail available from Corpus Christi to the 

Valley and North Texas and would be happy to use it. 

MORALES JOEL I believe the rail corridor that would extend into deep south Texas, specifically 

Cameron County would have a positive impact on the region. The reduced auto and bus traffic would improve the air quality as this area continues to grow. With the alternate transportation traffic accidents would likely decrease as well. The economic impact would also be felt along the route as well. 

Morales Marisa The best way to travel around a nation should be by train, like in Europe. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Moran Theresa I support this rail--my son lives in Dallas so it we would both use this rather than 

drive or fly. Great idea! Thank You 

Morgan Samantha I support the proposed Oklahoma-Texas high-speed Passenger Rail that would include 

a route from Corpus Christi to San Antonio. A route to Houston would be good to consider if that were possible as well. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. 

Morgan Samantha Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn 

travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. On my last trip out of town me and my family 

saw an accident scene where the car was literally not even a car or truck frame anymore, just completely mangled, burnt-up pieces of metal being loaded onto a flatbed. Also witnessed numerous people with TVs in the front seat, cell phones in front of face, while going 75 and above on the highway. Ridiculous and scary. Takes the fun out of driving these days. Rail would be an option that I have never experienced and would reduce traffic and risk of accidents like that, and accidents waiting to happen. 

Morris Micky I have checked all of the "all that apply" because encouraging and mandating 

expanded fast rail service would benefit the people of Texas throughout the spectrum of life. It is time to "return to the future" in Texas. Texas regulatory services and the Legislature should think about positive methods and effects in the future and quit kowtowing to special interests that only want to maintain the status quo. The status quo is not working, and will only be exponentially damaging to the state and its 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments citizens in the future. Fast rail is a tremendously positive method of transportation for the future. 

Morris Jody I believe rail travel is much more safe and effective with less pollution. Morrison wesley I would love to see a high speed rail service between South Texas and Oklahoma. I 35 

is so crowded and it would be a great alternative to driving on an overcrowded highway. 

Morrow Karl-Heinz We need to have better public transportation in Texas. Let's move forward with high 

speed rails and other train transportation services. 

Muchler Gloria I believe in doing all we can to have better communication, contact and transportation 

with all of the States. but, am wondering about the Environmental Impact of this interstate rail. I hope and pray we can make it environmentally friendly for man and beasts and flora and fauna. Thanks for your invitation to ask a question. 

Mueller Joseph P Rail will reduce traffic congestion, pollution, and accommodate travelers. Mulholland JoAnn This is needed and has been needed for decades. It will help people of all incomes. Mulholland JoAnn Don't take people's land if they don't want to sell. I hate this "right of domain" 

nonsense. Texas has plenty of land to accomplish this. Attention to the environment is important. Work with the Sierra club and other environmental organizations to achieve this, 

Munoz Tara We would love to see more passenger rail in Central Texas, esp. high speed. Traffic is 

a huge issue here and alleviating traffic by having more people travel rail would be a 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments much appreciated thing! 

Murry Bob Please give us fast trains. This will be great. Muschenheim Steve I am for the passenger rail service connecting San Antonio, South Texas and Dallas. It 

would be a boon for our area especially on South Padre Island. 

Navarro Martha S. I think it is a terrific idea to have a passenger train. It will provide additional needed 

transportation to our community. My childhood home was next to the railroad tracks and although it was noisy at times, I loved it. From the train itself to the conductor and when it would be stopped to be inspected, the sight was spectacular to a 7 year old. Passing by the old train station just blew up my imagination. I hope a passenger train makes its way to Laredo so children can have the opportunity to not only see a timeless beauty but ride in it too. Plus it makes sense to have one since our city is lined with tracks in convenient areas. 

Nazak Jennifer I strongly support a high-speed passenger rail service connecting Oklahoma and 

South Texas. It would help air quality, reduce our use of oil, reduce traffic, and improve people's quality of life. 

NealTomlinson Sylvia High speed rail between South Texas and Oklahoma is a great idea and much needed! Newcombe Mae Austin just needs more public transportation. It has gotten too big to sustain all the 

cars. Literally everyone I know complains about it. Too much traffic is one of the quickest ways to lower the quality of life. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Newman Marcy We are interested in the alternative locations and consideration for South Texas in the 

Lower Rio Grande Valley. 

Newman Kathy B. I'm in favor of rail transportation for Texas. Here are some reasons: 

•Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. •A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. •South Texas has no passenger rail service. •The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers •Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. •Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Nguyen Andrew High-speed rail between Dallas/Austin/San Antonio/Houston will vastly reduce 

carbon emission. 

Nickels Daniel My wife both enjoy riding on AMTRAK. We have taken several trips over the years 

and would probably take more if we had local access to AMTRAK. 

Nickels Judy Just want to add my comment on how WONDERFUL if we could have passenger rail 

come all the way from San Antonio to Corpus Christi, TX. My husband and I are great fans of Amtrak and try to take it whenever we can however, at this time we must drive to San Antonio or Houston and it would be OUTSTANDING if we could have a stop in Corpus Christi and the Valley. We shall keep our fingers crossed. Thank you for considering these routes. 

Nieland Thomas Mass transit especially trains would help a lot in reducing car traffic congestion, air 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments and water pollution, and fuel consumption! 

Noble Ron I think high speed rail between the cities mapped out would be a great help to our 

highway system. Many people could and would take the train if it was truly fast, and competitively priced with air travel. As it is today, a trip from San Antonio to Dallas is not just a one hour flight. You need to be to the airport at least 1.5 hours before the flight and if you check baggage you must wait 15 or 20 minutes for you bag(s). Then, if you rent a car there is time to get the rental car. In all a one hour flight to Dallas could take you 4.5 or 5 hours until you are ready to get to your destination in Dallas. Of course, if you hit rush hour, you could add another hour to your drive. If a train could go 100 MPH or even 150 MPH, then the trip would take 2 or 3 hours. If there were good reliable ground transportation in Dallas, then getting to your destination could take a total of 3 to 4 hours. Some saving in time and a lot less hassle. Think about the possibilities if the train could travel at 200 MPH. 

Nolan Dan More passenger rail will mean less driving and cleaner air. Northrop Emily We need the rail in order to get some cars off the roads. This will make the roads 

safer, reduce our use of fossil fuels, and improve our environment. Thanks. 

Norton Chuck The development of more passenger railways in Texas would be of great benefit to 

the people of the state and would be beneficial to the natural environment. The expansion of passenger rail service across Texas and connecting to neighboring states would give travelers an eco-friendly alternative to travel by highways, 

Norton Chuck reducing the traffic congestion on the roads and reducing the emission of pollutants 

by cars and trucks. For the elderly and disabled, rail travel is a safe and attractive 

option. Passenger rail service promotes economic activity, including tourism, and 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments makes the area more attractive to potential business investors. 

Novoa Dee Ann I totally support a rail system for Texas. I live in Laredo and would really enjoy going 

to SA or Austin on the rail. While there are a lot of road blocks ahead, please pursue. Thanks, Dee Ann 

Null Robert As a traveling Texan, I would like to see high speed rail as a mode of transportation 

around this great state. As population continues to grow, roads will become increasingly more congested and with rising gas prices, more people will begin to seek faster, cheaper modes of transportation from point to point within the state and high speed rail offers that solution. I implore you to do right by Texas drivers and help improve the state's economy by expanding rail services throughout the state. 

Ochoa Victoria HSR will bring billions of dollars into the economy. With a multiplier effect of 2.8 

and the immediate 2 million jobs it would bring (not to mention the thousands of jobs that would be created as the service grew in time), it is a no-brainer for the economy. It would also bring a plethora of cars off of the road, where congestion is a pain for the economy and the environment. For the sake of the economy and environment, HSR is imperative for Texas. 

O'Day Laufman 

Gabrielle I have long believed that there should be a network of high speed rail service linking 

major cities across the country. I live in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. My son lives in Ok and my in-laws live in Houston. What a joy it would be to jump on a train and be there in 2 or 3 hours, rather than spend hours jumping through airline hoops and still arrive an hour outside of the destination city. Airline travel should be reserved for long haul trips; short trips for the car; medium distance should be for rail. What's missing in this "ideal" situation is the rail part. Count me in! It' great for the traveling 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments public, great for the environment, and leaves the airlines for what they do best -- over 750 miles. Most people think of flying as the fastest means of transportation, like 45 minutes to Houston from DFW. That's not the way to look at it. Door-to-door is the way. With any flight you must add at least 3 and a half hours to get to the airport, check-in, security, flight delays. On the other end, you have baggage claim and then actually getting to your destination in the city. So you're actually looking at about 5 hours, all in. And at every step of the way you're needled nearly to insanity by security demands, obnoxious airline personnel, etc. I've lived in Europe where there is rail to everywhere. What a joy that would be for the U.S. 

Odom Julie It's time for rail, preferably high speed rail, in Texas. Our freeways cannot keep up 

with the number of people moving to our state and if the estimates hold true, the population explosion will continue throughout the next several decades. When I moved to Austin in 1982, I could drive to my parent’s house in Oklahoma City in about six hours - weekend, weekday, holiday - it always took the same amount of time. Today, that is just not possible, especially on a Friday or a holiday. IH-35 from Round Rock to Dallas is a parking lot much of the way. What are the alternatives? Only air. With so few flights, that must be planned far in advance or the price is not affordable for the average person. Texas is so far ahead in so many areas, yet we fall far behind when it comes to transportation. It really is embarrassing the lack of progress that has been made here in Austin on the never-ending traffic problems in the last THIRTY years. Houston and Dallas have plenty of freeways... Getting around the state is another problem, and one that could be solved by rail. IH-35 is obsolete. Unless it was 8-10 lanes, it wouldn't be big enough to handle the traffic, and we all know that is not possible. We need alternatives. Alternatives other than more roads, which will only add more cars. It's time for rail. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

O'Lena Mike •Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. 

•A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. •South Texas has no passenger rail service. •The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers •Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. •Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Tennyson E.L. With respect to your Texas - Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study, several years ago l 

studied this issue for the Transportation Research Board back when the MissouriKansas- Texas Railroad was studying electrification. l am aware that Union Pacific has bought it out and that times have changed. Southwest Airlines has grown to become the most successful airline in the United States. They blocked previous rail efforts but now see that for trips under 550 miles, rail is better than air for convenience, time and cost. 

Tennyson E.L. If this letter raises any questions in your mind, feel free to ask me about them, l am 

not seeking a consulting job nor do l represent any one that might benefit from this project other than the general public. We have a nephew in New Braunfels. 

Tennyson E.L. At present, air travel costs $ 65 plus 16 cents per mile, while electric rail costs $ 3 

plus 24 cents per mile. The break-even point is 600 miles. Beyond that 88 % of the trips will prefer by air. Oklahoma City to San Antonio is 489 miles, a rail market. The urban population of this route, including Dallas, is ten million, likely to produce 13,700 daily passengers of various types. Trip makers from San Antonio to Austin and Dallas, Oklahoma City to Dallas, casual local trips from Ardmore to Waco and 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Temple to San Marcos and commuters from New Braunfels to San Antonio, Dallas to Fort Worth and Norman to Oklahoma City. lt is likely that a train every two hours will be both economical and necessary with 'a. peak hour train in commuter districts. Double track will be required to 'accommodate both freight and passenger trains but where the old M-K-T right-of-way is available in the right place, freight and passenger might be separated with single track for each outside commuter districts, lf a relocated freight line made sense in some districts, do it, but a whole new passenger railroad is not viable. 220 miles-an-hour speeds are more costly than air travel here, even if viable in France and Japan. 

Tennyson E.L. For 16 years, l contracted for the Keystone Corridor service in Pennsylvania starting 

from scratch with a current population of 4.2 million along l-76. Without the trains at peak hours, l-76 would be blocked by gridlock. Since I retired, the Keystone Corridor has been upgraded to 110 miles per hour. That may be the most economical speed for your Texas - Oklahoma corridor. A trip from San Antonio to Oklahoma City would take 7.5 hours making all stops. Non-stop service is for the air lines. Trains might leave San Antonio at 6:am, 8, 10, noon, 2:pm, 4, 6 and 8:pm to Austin only, plus a commuter train at 5:pm to Austin. The present Amtrak service takes 14.5 hours with a layover in Fort Worth. Not good, only 34 miles per hour. 

Tennyson E.L. For speed with economy you will need multiple-unit electric trains capable of towing 

a dining car. They. cost about $ 390 per car hour compared to $450 per hour for diesel operation, and are 12% faster with the same track and stations. For lighter travelhours, shorter trains are economical this way. l believe you will have to incorporate Trinity Railway Express into this-operation. lt is physically present. lt can be a separate division. lt would benefit greatly from electrification.. For example, electric railcars will draw 240 kilowatt-hours per car-hour = $ 33.60 so with 50 passengers per 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments car with 83 ‘seats, the cost of power is only 1. cent per passenger-mile at 66 miles per hour average speed including stops. A diesel propelled car needs 0.4 gallons per mile so at 58 miles per hour will cost 3 cents per passenger-mile 180 % more than electric. 

For a time, the Keystone Corridor was downgraded to diesel operation so ridership fell 40 %because of the slower speed and less frequent operation with locomotive hauled trains, The electric trains are also locomotive hauled now, with costly penalties but the riders have come back. 

Tennyson E.L. At 66 miles per hour average, with an average of 50 passengers per 83-seat car, it will 

cost $ 5.91 per car-mile and 12 cents per passenger-mile with fares of perhaps $ 3 per boarding plus 19 cents per mile, with a discount on the $ 3 for commuters who do not buy a ticket every trip. They buy ten-trip or monthly tickets. The profit will go a long way to funding the investment, but not all the way. With perhaps 625 million annual passenger-miles, a profit of $ 43,750,000 per year will fund $ 650 million of bonds to help with construction. Taking 625 million annual passenger-miles off the highway will save about five lives a year plus $ 100 million per year on motor fuel that could support another $ 1.5 billion of bonds. Prudent electrification may require an investment of roughly $ 1.6 million per mile of track. 

Tennyson E.L. Urban property values near stations will likely rise considerably, greatly benefitting 

local communities. Airports will not suffer as population growth will keep them busy. They will save on costly expansion for their least profitable trips. 

Tennyson E.L. Trinity Railway Express needs an hour and 5 minutes to make its Dallas to Fort 

Worth trips. With electric multiple unit cars, they should make it in 45 minutes. That will cut their hourly cost and the number of hours while increasing their patronage and revenue. l made the schedules on the Keystone Corridor, so l know what can be 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments done actually. The Northern Indiana Commuter Transit District also operates this type of service, confirming the results. 

Tennyson E.L. Try for a cost plus fixed fee consultant. Beware of consultants who will try to sell you 

far more than you need. They hope for 12 % of the project cost as their fee, so will 

grossly overload you with bells and whistles. So will Union Pacific but their management is vastly improved now. lf you bargain shrewdly and honestly with them, you should get equity if they also benefit in some way. 

Tennyson E.L. Amtrak's Texas Eagle has been well promoted by local interests and has grown well 

but this project will impact the Texas Eagle. You have two choices. Terminate the Eagle at Dallas, or buy three electric locomotives to use to move The Eagle from Dallas to San Antonio. It will have to skip a couple of your minor stations to stay on time. 

Olivarez Tania Totally needed due to economic and environmental concerns! South Texas is poor and 

many don’t own a car; and for the ones that own a car it will reduce traffic and, more importantly, gas expenses which will therefore reduce pollution!! It will just make a 

better world! 

Oliver RJ High speed rail is the only way to help alleviate the congestive traffic on Texas 

Highways and is a much more economical and environmentally sound way of moving people and goods through Texas. It will also help remove the brown clouds that envelope our major cities like Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and Austin. It 's time the Texas Transportation Department stops supporting Big Oil and starts supporting the people of this state by encouraging clean, efficient high speed rail. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Oliver Lauren I would support any measures to expand rail service from Oklahoma to South Texas 

that would alleviate car travel and road congestion. We need more public transportation options, both within and between cities to support population growth in Texas and to continue to safeguard and improve air quality. Thank you. 

Osborn Gloria We need to get more cars off the roads. Osborne David I HIGHLY support high speed rail. It would benefit all citizens in so many ways. 

Even those that do not ride will benefit greatly. Please, please move forward with this project as quickly as possible. 

Osten John I believe this rail line could be a good alternative for the IH-35 corridor auto/truck 

congestion and important economic development tool/opportunity if (and this is a big 

if) it goes through urban areas and their centers. Also, is it going to complement the Austin-San Antonio Commuter Rail or is it going to be located on a completely different route? Respectfully, John Osten San Antonio Resident 

Ostrower Victor This questionnaire seems poorly conceived. It's unclear what you want. Effective 

mass transport is highly desirable, but it isn't worth much if not used. High speed rail is a great concept, but will it be used. It will require easy, convenient, and economical access at origins and destinations. I'm not sure how likely that will be despite its desirability. Good luck 

Pace Edgar and 

Cinda 

These comments relate to just about all of the topics above. Rail service between the 

major Texas-Oklahoma cities would relieve traffic congestion on highways, reduce pollution from cars meaning less noise and cleaner air. Please start; building more rail service in Texas. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Pancake Amy The U.S. needs more public transportation and rail is one important means of that. We 

must start to address with seriousness the environmental decline of the country and the world. 

Pantoja Felipe Howdy! On the alternatives to transportation, the railway from South Texas to 

Oklahoma sounds like a great choice! However, a few questions arise. How is this 

going to affect our household economy? What funds are going to be used to make this project a reality? Is the foreign (Mexican citizens, primarily) population going to be a major source of revenue for this project-a great amount of Mexican citizens not only use our current highways for pleasure but also for business-? 

Parchman Laura I hope this becomes a reality because I have been hoping for this since 2005 when I 

came back to Texas from Japan, where rail travel between cities is the norm. Please, please, please, make this a reality! 

Paredes Jr Pedro My comment regarding the new Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study: There is an 

area that is south a short distance from the Tourist Rest stop on IH35 where it connects with US83. It is next to the railroad lines where a terminal could be developed close to the trucking centers providing access to tractor trailer traffic and transfer of people going back and forth. I recently read that our country does not have this type of transportation yet. It would be great in many ways to have such a system here, setting the stage for the rest of the country to follow. 

Paris Brian I think it's time Texas adds high speed rail! I travel the state for work and it’s 

impossible to navigate IH-35 between Hillsboro and San Antonio without massive delays and several accidents. Please add me to the mailing list. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Parker Darel The idea that Texas doesn't already have an established passenger rail system between 

South Texas and the rest of the state seems ridiculous if not downright regressive. The most vocal opposition to a passenger rail system seem to be focused on the cost of such a project. I would remind those voices that roads and highways cost money also. We continue to throw tax dollars at new construction, wider highways, and toll roads, none of which solve the actual problem: There are too many automobiles on the road. Now imagine Austin or San Antonio or San Marcos without the additional traffic created by visitors from the Rio Grande Valley or shoppers from Mexico. Give these travelers an option that doesn't involve spending five hours packed tightly into a car or bus, or the expense of air travel, and they will use it. Does it completely solve the problem? No. But it's better than funneling an ever increasing amount of traffic into 

cities and communities that are already burdened beyond the limits of their infrastructure. Modern passenger rail is something Texas should have committed to a decade ago. Let's not waste another decade wondering what to do with all this traffic. The time is now. 

Parker-Boyd Jacqueline This would be a great contribution to alternative travel options. This would help 

consumers save money on travel expenses, with more rail and route options. Air travel could be reduced for individuals who travel between cities for business. Less traffic could equal faster turn-arounds on roadway maintenance and improvements. 

Job creation. Less harmful amount of emissions introduced into the environment than planes and cars. 

Parrish Mary It's rather sad that a state nearly the size of Europe doesn't have a comparable railway 

system. As a person who lived overseas, I believe the time is now for Texas to have a high speed railway system. This will not only make traveling easier, more affordable, safer and more enjoyable, but will greatly advance this mighty state's infrastructure. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Besides, we don't want to be outdone by France, do we? 

Partin Amy Having a train that travels from north Texas to south Texas would be better on our 

pocket books as well as the environment. People would be driving less. I would be more willing to travel if I had the option of taking a train. 

Patel Rajni We need to have few cars on the road as we are adding so much pollution. Also 

Railway is much safer for transportation, more economical too. 

Patterson Patience It is critical that the National Environmental Policy Act and the National Historic 

Preservation Act, along with the Native American Graves Protection Act are all strictly adhered to and that all processes should afford the public a chance to comment through those processes. 

Paul Wendy Rail is great because it puts less automobiles on the road leading to less carbon 

monoxide omissions. Then ALL of us can breathe! 

Peace Annalisa I strongly support passenger rail service between San Antonio and Oklahoma City for 

the following reasons: Trains keep more cars off the road. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no 

passenger rail service. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and 

comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. As one who frequently travels to Austin for business, I would welcome the option to travel by rail rather than drive the nightmare that is IH 35. Thank you, Annalisa Peace 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Peace Jimmy We need alternatives to cars and planes. Pearce Wanda This would be great for us. Pearson Kiesha I fully support the addition of high speed rail service in Texas. It will offer safer travel 

alternatives, provide more jobs and reduce air quality issues. Please drive this issue for continued support. 

Pedroza Noemi Passenger trains great idea. Pena Michael I feel like having a passenger train go through Laredo would be a great idea. It would 

boost up the economy as well and tourism here, which is what Laredo really needs. With Laredo growing at the rate it is, this would at the best interest of the city and our community. Many people do not have the means of transportation and this would be perfect. 

Pena Mark S. As a lifelong Texan and resident of the Rio Grande Valley, I believe it is truly 

unfortunate that high-speed rail service is not an alternative form of transportation in Texas. Apart from being safer, more sustainable and environmentally sensitive, high speed rail would better connect metropolitan centers and promote greater economic vibrancy for our state. My family and I would use and prefer high-speed rail service if it were available, and we hope Texas will continue to lead the nation and make highspeed rail a top priority for our state. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Pena Garza Sophia A passenger rail to south Texas (specifically to the Rio Grande Valley--McAllen area) 

would be wonderful. Due to my health issues I am not able to easily drive myself to the San Antonio and Austin areas. I would also love to be able to travel north to Oklahoma where my mother is originally from. Being able to travel without concentrating on driving would allow me and my family to see more of the state and country and be very fun and exciting. I am also happy that passenger rail travel is better for the environment than car or air travel. A passenger rail to south Texas would be wonderful. Please create it! 

Pennington Ann High speed rail is an attractive alternative to travel by car or plane for relatively short 

distances. For me, it is more comfortable and less tiring than either car or plane travel, considering the travel time involved. 

Perales David P. This rail way would be a good alternative for the present method of travel currently 

available. It could be highly use to get from the southern part of Texas to other cities. Not only for business but for pleasure, as in other events such as Sporting events. I just think that a lot of people would benefit from having that go through our area. 

Percival Kristina 

Leigh 

Grand Prairie is in both Tarrant and Dallas, it really has no public transportation. How will this Texas/Oklahoma rail system benefit us? 

Perlaky Daniel Rail has been proven numerous times as a better alternative to planes and I'd like to 

see more access to rail lines and inter-city connections. 

Peters Nancy I would like to see a fast rail from OKC to Texas for myself and for our disabled 

individuals and elderly who would benefit from this. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Pettit Mary We need better transportation systems in Texas. Trains would be ideal. They would 

save resources and time for many of us. 

Phillips Pamela Texas needs more rail service. I would love to go to Austin, Houston, etc. on the train. 

I could get to the airport faster and safer and it would make a big difference in my life. I would think rail would promote more jobs...think Taxis and addition Van companies and would also lead to better transportation in Texas over all...High speed rail is a Good idea! 

Picha Jonathan I feel that high speed rail is important along with local forms of public transportation 

that is reliable and efficient. High speed rail also needs to stay away from 

environmental sensitive areas and not encroach upon protected areas or disturb natural 

environments by laying track and bisecting natural habitats. 

Piper Victoria Would love to see high speed rail connect the state! Piraro Kaitlin I would absolutely love to have more passenger rail in Texas. My mom lives in Dallas 

and I have more family in Tulsa and it would be great to avoid driving several hours to visit them. Having more rail would decrease emissions caused by extra cars on the road or short plane trips between cities and make holiday travel a much more enjoyable and less environmentally-taxing experience. I take the bus to school every day and walk as much as possible. I'm always looking for more ways to cut my carbon footprint and having more rail would be a great way to continue that. 

Plasencia Cathy I care about air quality, reducing use of oil, and having more transportation choices. I 

would like to see rail services increased for higher speed passenger trains for Texas. I support this initiative for all of the reasons listed below. Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. sincerely, Cathy Plasencia 

Plate Linda Will the new service involve laying new tracks possibly impacting wildlife and 

streams? Will an environmental impact study be performed by and independent 

company? 

Portele Catherine I think high speed rail is very important so as to provide more options for travel, but I 

also consider getting more cars off the roads to be part of my support for high speed rail. 

Porter John I believe a high speed rail service would be invaluable to Texas and its citizens. Pottin Sandra This new way to travel would bring more tourism here to Laredo and surrounding 

areas which would also boost the economy here in south Texas so maybe this economic downturn we are all facing might impact us for a positive output and will also bring in more jobs so I think it’s a great idea to bring in a new way to travel and attract tourism here to south Texas 

Potts Emily I think that high speed rail is the direction that we need to be moving in. While this 

will not solve all of our traffic and environmental problems, I believe it is one of many solutions to alleviate traffic, improve air quality and encourage better stewardship of our natural resources. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Powers J I SUPPORT THE HIGH SPEED RAIL BETWEEN OKLAHOMA CITY AND 

SOUTH TEXAS! THIS WOULD REDUCE TRAFFIC ON OUR ALREADY CONGESTED HIGHWAYS. HOPEFULLY IT WOULD AVOID AWARDING MORE CONTRACTS TO FOREIGN AND OUT-OF- TEXAS CONTRACTORS FOR MORE ROADS. IT WOULD REDUCE AIR POLLUTION BY LOWERING THE NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON OUR ROADS, REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF FUEL PER-PERSON TO TRAVEL THE SAME ROUTE AND INCREASE THE SAFETY OF TRAVELERS. THE NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDER HAS BECOME INCREASINGLY FRUSTRATING IN PAST YEARS WITH HEAVY TRAFFIC RESULTING IN INCREASED TRAVEL TIMES AND HIGHWAY SHUTDOWNS. MANY PEOPLE THAT WOULD NOT HAVE CHOSEN MASS TRANSIT IN THE PAST WOULD NOW BE RECEPTIVE BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC AND INCREASED FUEL COSTS. 

Prather Steve A review of the literature supports the feasibility of passenger rail in the IH-35 

corridor. It has been one of the most studied transportation issues in the U.S. Previous attempts to implement high speed rail in Texas failed primarily due to lobbying by Southwest Airlines. 

Pratt Byron I'm 58. I remember fondly of riding the train. It seemed way cooler than the auto and 

who in the hell could afford the airplane: ) Sure, the railroads were built by megalomaniacal idiots who did not know what the 'f' they were doing (other than making money), but even given that, the railroads more or less worked well Eventually. We need to bring them back. I'll leave you with this: The City of New Orleans by Steve Goodman Riding on the City of New Orleans, Illinois Central Monday morning rail Fifteen cars and fifteen restless riders, Three conductors and twenty-five sacks of mail. All along the southbound odyssey The train pulls out at 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Kankakee Rolls along past houses, farms and fields. Passin' trains that have no names, Freight yards full of old black men And the graveyards of the rusted automobiles. CHORUS: Good morning America how are you? Don't you know me I'm your native son, I'm the train they call The City of New Orleans, I'll be gone five hundred miles when the day is done. Dealin' card games with the old men in the club car. Penny a point ain't no one keepin' score. Pass the paper bag that holds the bottle Feel the wheels rumblin' 'neath the floor. And the sons of pullman porters And the sons of engineers Ride their father's magic carpets made of steel. Mothers with their babes asleep, Are rockin' to the gentle beat And the rhythm of the rails is all they feel. CHORUS Nighttime on The City of New Orleans, Changing cars in Memphis, Tennessee. Half way home, we'll be there by morning Through the Mississippi darkness Rolling down to the sea. And all the towns and people seem To fade into a bad dream And the steel rails still ain't heard the news. The conductor sings his song again, The passengers will please refrain This train's got the disappearing railroad blues. Good night, America, how are you? Don't you know me I'm your native son, I'm the train they call The City of New Orleans, I'll be gone five hundred miles when the day is done. ©1970, 1971 EMI U Catalogue, Inc and Turnpike Tom Music (ASCAP) 

Jara Jose Alfredo Le comento que estaria muy bien que se realizara el transporte de el tren ya que 

tendria buen beneficio tanto ambiental como en lo economico para las familias. Veo que un gran numero de jovenes universitarios acuden a universidades como UTSA, UT, etc. y son de las areas que tienen en proyecto hacer la ruta de el tren, por lo tanto estas familias se estarian tambien beneficiando en lo economico para visitar a sus hijos y viceversa. Que mas beneficios traeria este proyecto de el tren? Estoy a favor. Gracias. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Presley Brenda I am in favor of high speed trains in Texas to help reduce congestion on freeways and 

give people alternatives for travel. 

Preston R. All of the above apply but also, I would like to be able to get to attractions in large 

cities without having to drive in the traffic, getting lost, having to drive in unfamiliar areas and driving after dark. 

Price Karen I am in favor of extending rail service in Texas. Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail has 

been very successful. Extension would benefit Texas economically, environmentally, and quality of life by reducing the cost of building more highways, high energy costs, vehicle exhaust, and crowding and maddening traffic jams. 

Price J. R. I am in favor of more intercity trains (Amtrak or private railroads) and transit rail 

because of a concern about traffic and air quality. Building more highways, or 

spending billions of dollars and years of hassle widening present interstate and state highways, does not assist this country in lessening the demand for fossil fuels. Building highways has a huge negative impact on the quality of air in urban areas. Also, travel by rail is certainly less stressful than travel by air, which impacts our quality of life. This is what I would like to see in Texas: (1) More frequency of Amtrak trains on existing routes, and improved speeds. We do not necessarily need high speed trains initially, if we could have trains that average 60-70 mph to be more competitive with our individual cars. One train a day in each direction is not necessarily convenient. A morning departure to OKC from FTW would help tremendously. Trains running between Marshall and San Antonio several times a day on existing tracks would attract riders doing business at all the cities along the Eagle route. Also, creating routes that include Waco, instead of McGregor would make more sense economically. (2) Additional routes between SAT-HOU-DAL-FTW (the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Texas Triangle) with stations at airports at SAT, IAH, DAL, and DFW. (3) New routes from Fort Worth to El Paso and Fort Worth to Amarillo through Lubbock. (4) Extend the Texas Eagle route to Corpus Christi and the Valley. For the area: (5) Extend passenger rail from OKC to Tulsa and onto Kansas City. (6) Extend a route from FTW to LBB to AMA to Denver so people could go to Denver, Salt Lake City, and San Francisco by way of the California Zephyr. Business travelers would not travel between DFW and DEN most likely, but many leisure travelers would, if they could. Efficiency in air travel would improve if more people could ride trains between the short markets (DFW to AUS or SAT, or DFW to IAH) to catch airplanes to cities that are 750 miles or more away from each other. 

Pritchard Holly We need high speed rail in Texas. The population continues to explode here, and I can 

personally attest to the need to alleviate traffic congestion in Austin, San Antonio, San Marcos and the entire IH35 corridor! Additionally, the air quality in Texas is some of the worst in the nation. I would be proud of my chosen state if it became a leader in progressive energy and transportation solutions. It would also be extremely awesome to be able to get to Houston, Dallas, etc. in half the time it takes or less to drive there by car. 

Prodger Diane Passenger rail travel is a much used transport system in most of Europe and there is 

no reason why it should not work here as well. It is "smart" because it is far safer than 

traveling by car, creates less air pollution by reducing the number of cars and planes needed, lessens road congestion and provides valuable time to passengers during their journey. As someone who has travelled many times by train in the UK, France and Argentina, I have found that there is something very convenient and very relaxing about this form of transport. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Pueblitz Paula I believe that the rail system is a great idea. I would personally use it. I have family in 

Northeast Texas and in Brownsville. I hope that this railway system comes to light. 

Pyle Lacey More high speed rail in Texas would be great for the economy. People would take 

pleasure trips more often, and business trips would be less costly for companies. Also, being stuck in traffic, especially in between Austin and anywhere else, is really bad for your health and peace of mind - with a train, you don't have to worry about anything while drivers are under stress the entire drive. Don't forget the chance of a crash in a car, that's still the biggest killer in the US and train crashes are far less likely. And of course air quality and the environment - Texas has both a lot of people and big open spaces - more rail and less cars would be the best solution for continued coexistence. 

Quereau Tobin For many reasons I support the development of better high speed passenger rail 

service between San Antonio and Oklahoma City. The reduction in traffic on IH 35, the reduction in energy use to transport passengers along this route, the increase in air quality, and the provision of options for travel all contribute to the potential value of this project. 

Quigley Keith Glad to see we are considering extended rail into south Texas. All in favor of more 

rail travel. Thanks 

Quintanilla Estela Just this year a toll road between Lockhart and Austin was built with a speed limit of 

85 miles an hour. There have been several accidents involving wildlife crossing the road, particularly during the night. How safe will this high speed train be if wildlife will also be crossing those tracks? The impact on both human lives and wildlife may be major. Also, if we travel by train to other major cities, will there be rental car 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments agencies and taxi service nearby once travelers get to their destinations? Many of us travel to see doctors, for entertainment or to the airports since we only have two airlines servicing Laredo. Southwest Airlines services Corpus, and McAllen but 

Laredo has been bypassed by the airline with the cheapest fares. 

Quiter Michelle I am in favor of the train from San Antonio to Oklahoma. My suggestion would be to 

have at least four times per day to go either north or south. I would try Amtrak if there was a more convenient schedule. Thank you. 

RAGHAVAN SRINI I think that a high speed rail between Oklahoma and south Texas would be GREAT!I 

If I had an option today to take a high speed train from Dallas to Austin/San Antonio and Houston, I will immediately do it! I see the following advantages for commuters on high speed rail: - Stress Free Travel (No traffic jams, congestion) - Safe (Reduces traffic could mean less accidents) - Less Pollution (Less cars = less pollution) - Cost Effective (more competition to airlines) - Work while you travel (with high speed internet on trains, that would be great!!) Thank you! Srini 

Rambow Rosemary Rail is good for Texas. Less automobile traffic and faster. Cleaner air as a result. Ramo-Gechter Suzanne High-speed Rail in South Texas would be such a boon to our community! Laredo is 

already a large inland port, and we see a lot of tourist traffic from Mexico. I can imagine that high-speed rail would bring even more of that tourist trade farther north, benefiting the economies of all of South and Central Texas. For my own part, a highspeed rail system would have been of huge benefit to me this year as I went back to school in Austin, but needed to keep my two jobs in Laredo. Being able to take the train back and forth would have been a time saver and aided me in my studies (since I could have studied during my commute). Judging from comments I have received 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments from parents whose children attend college in San Antonio, Austin, and Dallas - all along the IH-35 corridor, really - they too would make use of the rail system. Because Laredo is more than 2 hours from the nearest larger city, having high-speed rail would make it much easier for people here to get to medical professionals they currently have to drive long hours to reach, cultural events in San Antonio, Austin, and Dallas, as well as shopping, day trips, and visiting family and friends in this great (but very large!!) state! In short, I am highly in favor of high-speed rail in South Texas, and I urge you to make Laredo the "final stop." It would make a city that is currently far from everything, much more accessible, and it would make the rest of the state much much more accessible to us. Many thanks, Suzanne Ramo-Gechter 

Ramos Miki Texas needs more rail options. We are an expanding economy and population. A rail 

connecting us to Oklahoma is sensible. It will relieve congestion and will reduce harmful greenhouse gas emissions and ground level ozone that is hazardous to public 

health. 

Rand Derrick Adding high speed rail between the cities is an excellent alternative to the congestion 

problem on IH-35. I live in Dallas and every time I travel to Austin to see my family there's always a fatal accident clogging up the freeway. Every holiday there's a traffic jam sometimes all the way from Austin to Waco. Providing rail would give us a safe alternative to expensive and hassle ridden air travel! Air quality improves through reduced burning of jet fuel, safety is improved through less wrecks. How else are you going to address the problem that is IH-35 with the rate of growth expected in Texas over the next 25 years? Building more traffic lanes is not a solution! 

Rand Audrey Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail We've needed this for years, but I think that NOW 

Texans are more receptive to its idea because of the increased vehicle load on our 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments streets and highways. Passenger rail would decrease noise, poor air quality and our stress levels from fighting that bumper to bumper traffic on IH-45 and IH-35, and increase human health due to the safety factor of getting off the highway for that long trip from San Antonio to Dallas. If we don't plan now for the future, how will we manage all of these folks flocking to Texas to enjoy our wonderful state and way of life? I traveled to Japan and rode 3 different speeds of their bullet trains. Those folks have it together! Let's take their lead and give Texas drivers an alternative to being stuck in traffic on our interstate byways! Thanks for listening! Audrey Rand 

Ray Robert I greatly support the proposed rail service from Oklahoma City to San Antonio, for 

both air quality and convenience. 

Ray Jan I think anything that lessens the traffic in Texas is a good thing. Reagan Michael R. My question is will this mode of transportation actually generate enough revenue to 

be viable and make a profit? Personally, I think it is a boondoggle that smacks of Obamanomics. This will be no different than AMTRAK. How many times has that gone bankrupt and been bailed out by the Federal Government? Too many. I cannot see where this is an economically feasible project. I am adamantly against this albatross and waste. 

Reagle Marla I support more rail service in Texas. Reback Storms I am all for bringing a passenger rail line from Texas to Oklahoma. The car culture is 

killing the planet. We need to have other options. Trains makes sense, especially in a state as big as this one. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Reddy Kessie Why only Oklahoma to Texas. Why not expand this to a National model and get all 

states to participate. You would save a bunch, if you combine all studies, since some states like California have already done most of the grunt work. 

Redmond Lissa We need some form of mass transit in this state. it is ridiculous for us to have no other 

forms of transportation except for cars to get to where we need to go. Wouldn't it be nice to be able to travel from Dallas to Austin or Houston w/o having to drive on our crowded, and always under-construction highways! 

Reeck Thomas With fuel costs rising and an ever increasing population, the IH-35 corridor will 

become more crowded and unbearable in terms of traffic congestion. Therefore, I 

fully support development of railways in Texas to ease the strain on our existing transportation systems. 

Reed Raymond We need rail transportation between cities to reduce traffic congestion. Reeser Rose Ann I'm writing to urge TxDOT to work toward a usable network of passenger trains for 

Texas. The current route under consideration, Oklahoma City to South Texas, would be a good step in that direction. More enormous toll roads are not the answer to moving large numbers of people in and between our urban centers. On the East Coast, trains move hundreds of thousands of people per day, reducing energy consumption, pollution and land needed for roads and parking lots. With the numbers of people moving to the Southwest every day, (re)building an efficient passenger train system NOW seems like an obvious choice. We have enjoyed using what Amtrak service does exist now, traveling between Chicago and Austin, Austin and Oklahoma City, and Austin and Fort Worth by train. However, because the passenger trains must yield to the freight traffic, schedules are unreliable, so it's not an efficient way to travel if 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments one is on a tight schedule. Please allocate funding for passenger train development. We would use it, as would thousands of Texans and Oklahomans. Thank you. 

Reeves Susan Jane Less cars on road for longer trips. More mobility for seniors n those who do not drive. 

More jobs. 

Reeves Susan Jane Good rail transportation provides the ease in travel within and outside Texas. It 

promotes a healthy and safe environment for all. The cost of operating a motor vehicle is forcing many to rely on public transportation.....both older people and younger people. This will also bring much needed employment to the state. 

Reim Mike Currently the Heartland Flyer runs through but does not stop at Krum TX. If the 

Heartland Flyer could include a stop at Krum TX, passengers would be close enough 

to connect to the existing Denton TX DCTA Rail system which goes all the way into Dallas via DART Rail and serves many cities in between (e.g., Lewisville, TX, Carrollton, TX, etc). Instead of spending millions of dollars to build new rail lines save money and use existing rail lines. Again, have a Heartland Flyer stop in Krumm TX then provide vans/bus transport to Denton (approx 10 miles) to connect to the Denton TX DCTA Rail system. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Appreciate all your efforts. Mike Reim 

Reinhuber Joachim I commute regularly from San Marcos to Corpus Christi/ Kingsville. My experience 

with German high speed rail has been fantastic. I think opening a rail line from Oklahoma through Dallas, Waco, Austin, San Antonio (with a stop in San Marcos!), to Corpus and then along the new I67 corridor into the Valley would be an incredible boost to this dynamic area. I would use it regularly. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Reiter John That train would be wonderful. Resendiz Susan Any rail system must include Houston. The Houston Medical Center is a hub for 

medical care for people from South Texas and Mexico. A rail system from Brownsville to Houston would make a large difference for that route, especially since the road is not very good. I hope the King Ranch is not an impediment to such rail service. 

Reynolds Jonathan I would like to add my support for additional passenger rail service from Dallas/Fort 

Worth to Oklahoma City and points north. The more north bound passengers that we can accommodate, the better off we'll all be. Any method to reduce car traffic on IH35 is very beneficial to the area environmental quality. I highly support a passenger rail station in Krum, Texas. The city is very supportive of this, and with the Denton passenger potential, this service would be very popular. I also support an additional passenger north bound early morning run from Fort Worth. 

Rice Joan Since air traffic has become so cumbersome and Texas is so big, trains seem like the 

logical and ecological way to travel nowadays. We would visit family in Oklahoma and other contiguous states if we didn't have to spend whole days driving to and from them. 

Richards Gill More rail transport for Texas- Air quality and climate change are our most urgent 

concerns. Every passenger mile in automobiles and commercial jets reduces our air quality. Rail transport is perfect for Texas- plenty of right of way, public networks already in the big cities, state and national need for new investments. Now is the timewhat's being done? Gill Richards 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Riddle Iva L Texas needs more passenger rail service, and Texas needs more high speed rail 

service. We need the option of going by rail instead of flying or driving. 

Riecker John T I STRONGLY FAVOR more rail service in Texas, especially high-speed rail between 

San Antonio and Dallas, connecting on to Oklahoma City. Here are some of my reasons for supporting this: Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. Thanks for considering my comments! John T. Riecker 

Riley Cynthia A I am strongly in favor of high speed passenger rail! Please make it possible for us to 

get to Dallas, San Antonio, etc. without suffering the nightmare that is sitting on IH35. Thanks. 

Rinard Thomas I believe that Texas is behind in mass transit on both a city and state level. I welcome 

an alternative to driving on the interstate in commuting between major cities in Texas. 

Rinker Robert I think a modern high speed rail line from Dallas to Austin (and beyond) would be a 

great alternative to IH-35, or Southwest. 

RIVERA CESAR We rely on fossil fuels far too much. It is time for America and Texas to catch up to 

the rest of the world in public transportation. Other countries provide safe, fast and convenient public transportation at fairly low costs for city to city commuters. Yet, America lags behind and holds on to this love affair with oil. I am a commuter and I 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments utilize a commuter bus. It takes me longer to get to where I’m going but is a better alternative to driving. Texas should have invested in a rail between San Antonio and Austin instead of wasting money on another toll road. Let’s wake up and get greener. We are ravaging our natural resources when there are other alternative, renewable resources, fuels and technologies available to us. Let’s get moving, Texas. 

Rivera Jose J Dear Sirs: We care about our air quality, reducing our use of oil, and having more 

transportation choices. A new, higher speed passenger rail service between Oklahoma City and South Texas, would give millions of Texans the option to take the train rather than drive or fly across the state. Rail can take Texas farther. Roads alone 

cannot serve all our travel needs--now or in the future. As our population grows, our economy demands on more transportation options. And based on the financial success of the nation's highest speed train routes, Amtrak's Acela service, passenger rail service is a better public investment than building more highways. The facts are that: Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. We strongly support the proposed OklahomaTexas Passenger Rail. Thank you, Jose J. Rivera 

Rivera Juan C. I would very much like to see this passenger train come to the Laredo area. I believe 

that it just make sense to bring this form of transportation here. It will alleviate traffic congestion, will help reduce carbon emissions, from having less vehicles on the highway, will improve the economic growth of the area, by providing people the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments opportunity to come to and from Laredo, that wouldn't normally do so, because they do not own a vehicle. Etc., etc, etc. 

Rivera Luis I do believe it would be a magnificent idea to have in the beautiful state of Texas such 

High Speed Rail Train like the one proposed. Hopefully we can get it and hopefully, I 

would be alive when implemented. Is a good plan; it would reduce pollution by hundreds of vehicle that would have the alternative to joint this initiative. Thanks. 

Roane Jerry Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study public comments to CH2M HILL Energy in 

the future will drive decisions and traditional trains simply use too much energy per passenger mile at 2812 BTU per passenger mile. This is not green it is not energy saving. What replaces trains for ground passenger transport has to be more energy efficient to compete against what will replace passenger train travel. The market has clearly rejected Amtrak but because of federal government subsidies Amtrak has been on its last leg for 42 years. Change is hard and the problem with trains medium speed or slow speed as apparently high speed is off the table with plenty of reasons for it to be off the table, is they pollute far too much NOx and they burn tremendous amounts of valuable fossil fuels for each customer served. Not only are trains energy intensive but the tracks they roll on are a biohazard with all those land polluting poisons that kill not only bacteria in the wood timbers but many small creatures around the gravel beds and ties. Trains were an important part of the expansion into the West but that is over and it is time to look at better alternatives that can serve the customers much better at lower energy cost and without putting air pollutants into the air for our children to breathe. The NOx pollution from a diesel train is phenomenal. Even the brand new trains that will be in service for 40 years are heavy polluters compared to the competition. The trains on the rails now will not come out of service for maybe 50 years depending on maintenance plans so they will be polluting essentially at 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments unfettered 1970s levels for many years to come. It is irresponsible for our government to support inefficient high polluting heavy vehicle to move lightweight people. Trains are great for gravel and till coal is shut down hauling coal from Wyoming to Texas but the amount of gravel to be hauled may be less with a paradigm shift in transportation from the present form to the next revolution. According to the Portland Cement Association half of all concrete (gravel and klinker) is used in making the present form of roads. As transportation evolves to high tech systems concrete and asphalt roads will be offset if not replaced with smaller less raw material intensive forms. This will greatly decrease the amount of gravel hauled by trains and with coal being replaced by massive finds in shale natural gas using fracking and cars that can deliver themselves to the buyer via Google’s self driving car electronics the railroad business will be quite different from what it is today. Its strength is hauling mining bull dozers and military heavy artillery or just about any really large and heavy object. Its weakness as evidenced by Amtrak’s economic abject failure is moving individual passengers door to door. There are no rental agencies at train stations as one simple example of how little demand there is for service from trains. At the airport there are at least 30 car rental companies all clamoring for customer business. If trains were anywhere in the same realm there would be at least one car rental company positioned at the train station yet there is not. Evidence has not in the past made any difference in the FRA’s quest to still provide train passenger service in the face of economic failure. This comment is not all negative. This comment is for moving forward providing customer focused superior service with an energy budget that is actually fully sustainable in real time. I suggest building TriTrack along the edge of railroad right of way and use that much more efficient people mover for passenger service. That advantage is now that underutilized right of way edge that is now just something to mow or accidentally burn to a profit center. The customers get high speed service 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments depending on laws and regulations either at 180 mph service or 201 mph service to all the major US regions with a door to door provision so that trip time for the customer is still at 180 mph door to door with 18 second slow down periods for any turns. This is a hybrid of maglev-like acceleration but without the cost of old-school maglev and because the car weight is less than the weight of the occupants you are not falling back into the train problem of moving massive amounts of steel and iron to move a 190 pound person. More importantly from an energy standpoint at any speed that is competitive today the aerodynamic drag is drastically lower allowing for high speed at low energy levels. In fact the energy level is under the energy budget that PV solar panels along the route just under the wheels of the vehicle will provide 24/7. By using on site generation of all the electric power necessary to move the transportation network it is clear to the public that no air pollution is made at all for this passenger service. The PV solar panels will be by the side of the trains running diesel with no version of a particulate filter so the panels will need to be washed down regularly to remove the chemical stew that trains emit of which are 260 suspected and known human carcinogens. Handicapped persons --- If you some day find yourself in a wheelchair for whatever reason your mobility is going to be challenged. What evolving transportation will do for your new position is provide you bedside to bedside travel totally unassisted. If you can blow in a tube to manipulate your wheelchair you will be able to legally drive yourself to anywhere in the US network. The vehicle for a wheelchair will be your property and thus configured for your specific needs and wants and the wheelchair version opens in the middle and also squats down to let you drive your electric wheelchair into the driving position of the ADA compliant space. From your wheelchair driving by wire and no need to get out of your special space foam cushion in your chair you will be able to close the car and drive on city streets without a state driver’s license. This is under the NEV laws in all 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments states that matter. Driving to the nearest guideway grid intersection as your dashboard tells you or letting Google Self Driving electronics drive you there is you are further impaired, you enter the guideway where the computer takes over driving and merges into a line and enters a triangular guideway that is 14.5 inches on a side. This guideway contains the linear motor which is maglev-like but does not depend on high speed power electronics for trajectory control but just creates a thousand or so pound force of launch power to the vehicle for the first 1500 feet of guideway only. Then a motor inside the car running as a BEV moves you at 180 mph or 201 mph to the other end of that guideway. No cross traffic no merges. Once you come back down to the ground to make a turn, you slow to 40 mph, do your street turn, then back up on a guideway. This network of guideways is the key to both mobility and to economy as it is the network effect that made the railroads work and what will make the replacement work. The network effect of a fully implemented system is where the value to the customer comes and where the profit to the operation comes from. In the middle section of each of these trips depending on the distances this person in a wheelchair wants to go a higher speed segment may be implemented that goes 363 mph but is not Siemens maglev but again energy sustainable and cost effective far below the cost of the abandoned Siemens design of the 1970s which was and is a power hog. My condensed comment -- Please allow for an alternatives analysis much like the I70 corridor study for Denver to Vail to legitimately consider the technologies available today to greatly improve customer experience and get the nation off of sweet crude oil and stop polluting the air. One expert states that in Texas that 10% of the NOx pollution is from trains. That is horrific since trains do not move 10% of objects in Texas and watching the last train I observed the black soot blowing out the top of a 65 mph Amtrak train would never pass the opacity requirement for a power plant as it 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments climbed a slight incline. TriTrack 

Roberts Sunny I think the train sounds good. It would lower air and ground traffic and make it easier 

to get across the state and hopefully cheaper than air or car. 

Roberts Mark Please check out California's well-documented costs for passenger rail service 

(exorbitant costs) verses bus service (there are lots of PRIVATELY OWNED bus lines that can transport passengers at a fraction of the cost and change routes per demand that rail can't do)! See recent broadcast on CBS 60 Minutes. 

Robinson Howard Quicker, cheaper, cleaner transport which reduces noise and air pollution in the DFW 

area has to be a win-win for us all. It will also prove to be a revenue booster for the area! 

Rodgers Christine I live in Tulsa OK and support the development of quality passenger rail service in 

Texas and Oklahoma. It has huge ramifications for environmental health and climate quality. It will also allow citizens of this and surrounding areas the ability to travel in the future as fossil fuel resources decrease in quantity and increase in price. I would hate to see this part of the country isolated through an inability to face the future. As of now and knowing my small efforts are not enough to make a very big dent in environmental problems such as Climate Change (Global warming) I still try to live as simply as possible so I can decrease my personal impact on the climate and the life systems of the planet. I have a background in life sciences and fully understand the threat to all the life systems of the planet including our air, weather and water systems from our wasteful over-use of fossil fuels. My husband and I, do not take part in consumer culture, we grow as much food as we can and try to buy and eat locally while recycling everything we must purchase. We avoid unnecessary use of petroleum 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments based travel. My husband and I have chosen not to use air travel for transportation even though we have family all over the country. When we have the time and energy to drive long distances to visit grandchildren we rent a fuel efficient auto so that when home we need only a very used and low mileage car for our limited transportation in town, keeping it to a minimum. I realize that the amount of automobile and air travel in this country cannot continue at current levels without very devastating effects to our environment and the economy. I love traveling to Dallas to visit a friend and go to the art museums especially and other cultural events and places. I have not used the train from OKC yet, though I have heard good things about it. I am still hoping for good rail service between OKC and Tulsa first. That would be amazing! I bet it would be even more likely to happen when there is excellent rail service all the way to South Texas where we also have family. I am sure rail travel will become more and more appreciated and used as the public in this part of the country becomes more familiar with such a new (to us) form of travel. As I age I believe it would make much more sense than either driving or flying. The cost of mining a decreasing petroleum resource will soon make the usual forms of transportation cost prohibitive. Every day I become more aware of just how wasteful and destructive we are, selfishly using such large quantities of fossil fuels that we will leave my grandchildren and possibly my children living in a world much less bountiful and healthy than the one my generation was able to enjoy. Texas and Oklahoma should not be left in the dust as other parts of the country move forward, building better infrastructure and becoming better prepared for a more limited future. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

RODRIGUEZ M. I am all for this idea of rail as an alternative mode of commercial transportation. I 

believe the highways were already too congested with trailer trucks and now with the 

activity that Eagle Ford Shale is producing, the congestion is out-of-control! It is no longer fun to plan a trip outside of Laredo just thinking that one will have to drive in all that traffic which increases stress levels! I am also in favor or passenger rail transportation. This option would allow many to travelers who don't have a vehicle, 

don't fly and don't like bus transportation to have a fourth option. An option which may become a main choice of traveling for many, including tourists! 

Rodriguez Gabriel The railway study is an amazing thing. Thank you for looking into the future with 

such an awesome plan. 

Rogerio Lisa Very interested in making this happen. Rogers Craig An extension of Amtrak from San Antonio to Corpus Christi would be a benefit to 

both cities. San Antonians come to Corpus for our beaches, fishing and boating. Corpus Christians travel to San Antonio for the Riverwalk, shopping and dining. It seems like a natural connection to let folks avoid the two hour drive. 

Rooke Molly Rail makes good sense for many reasons: environmental, safety, quality of life, 

efficiency, energy security and additional and improved transportation options for more Texans. Trains keep cars off the road and reduce the number of short-distance airplane trips, which improves our air quality. The reduced car congestion and traffic would also make our highways safer. Trains are more efficient, too, since the overall energy consumption per passenger is nearly half that of planes or cars, which improves our energy security. South Texas has no passenger rail service, and it would be good to add that. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers, so we need to build on that with increased, good quality passenger rail service to more of Texas. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and rail could serve smaller cities with stops along the way that are left out of airline service. Comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time which allows the travelers' time to be more productive, relaxing and enjoyable. I care about our air quality, reducing our use of oil, and having more and better transportation choices, and I would happily use additional rail 

often. 

Rosales Santos I really like this idea. I know it would create more jobs in Oklahoma and Texas but I 

was worried about the noise level as well as the safety, traffic, and the area the rail 

would get put at. 

Rosales Rooolfo Do the plans for Oklahoma to South Texas include Waco, Austin, San Antonio, and 

then where? I would think that a line to Brownsville through Haringen and another 

line to Corpus Christie would be awesome. Also are we considering connecting to Houston and then eventually to El Paso? 

Rose Donna I am in favor of the Oklahoma-Texas passenger rail service, and I have heard 

countless other express their wishes for passenger rail service in Texas. I know several people who have attempted to use the existing line which runs through Austin through north and east Texas, but due to how slow it was they found it to be an untenable solution. My family members would personally use this service for both business and personal travel on a regular basis instead of using our vehicles. Please do what you can to make this a reality that will help the Southwest become as convenient a place to travel and do business as the northeastern US and many other parts of the world. It will help build our economy and secure our long-term future. Thank you for 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments considering my comments. Donna Rose 

Rose Roger Hello, my name is Roger Rose and I missed the opportunity to be at the meeting here 

in Laredo last week. I am currently a Grad. student at Texas A&M International, here in Laredo, majoring in History. My Undergrad degree was in Urban Planning and Administration and I love working on projects of this scale. I am working on two proposals to submit to the Laredo City Council, one involving a World Birding Center here in Laredo, the second to create a tourist friendly Plaza/Market square here in Laredo. A train station could be a perfect cornerstone for such a project. I am not sure of the market that would use rail here, I would suggest many seasonal migrants. The biggest competitor would be the Auto bus service to places like Houston, Dallas and Chicago. If you were to have perhaps an overnight service from Laredo, that would arrive in Dallas the following morning, or service that would continue farther north. You would have to offer something that the bus services do not offer. No Interstate 35 check points. The station here could be set up similar to a TSA check point at airports. The service could be operated on a 3 or 4 day a week schedule. Please get in touch if there's any assistance I can provide. Roger Rose 

Rose Mary Sue I want to support mass transit in and through the state of Texas. . . specifically high 

speed, reliable rail service. We must get high volumes of traffic off of our highways, both to preserve energy resources (gas and diesel) and to maintain the condition of highways so that they don't have to be repaired and replaced. Not only will high speed and reliable rail service reduce car traffic, it will improve air quality. People will continue to want to get from place to place and in increasing numbers as our population grows. It is smart planning to make these improvements to people moving now. Already the IH-35 corridor is overcrowded as is the I45 corridor in Houston. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Rail service is needed and now, so let's get started! 

Roset Janet Let's move into this century with transportation that makes sense and helps to save 

our precious environment. 

Ruark-Cavett Sosha I would like to see a safe and effective way to reduce congestion and air pollution 

while still being able to travel through large swaths of Texas. 

Ruiz Gabriel I believe the passenger railroad study TxDOT is conducting is a very proactive way to 

minimize the future congestion issues along IH35. I would like to see the railroad in Laredo, Texas. I know of many people who would rather ride the train than drive 2:30 hours to San Antonio. I believe it would also increase commerce and overall be very productive for all cities involved. 

Rushing Debir it would be nice o know we can travel without so much traffic congestion and 

pollution-not to mention enabling commuters to avoid the stress of fellow travelers on 

the roads. 

Rushing R L The more forms of transportation that are available to the public, the better. A rail 

system that has a higher degree of speed, will help commerce. The more people that take the rail system will help to lower highway traffic and highway accidents. I rarely go to Dallas or Fort Worth because of the insane amount of highway traffic. The rail system needs more than one set of tracks going from Oklahoma City to Dallas. It needs at least two. There needs to be more than one passenger train a day between the two states. I hope the rail system grows, but I figure the controlling powers will squash this like a bug because there is a lot of money to be made building highways and selling petroleum products. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Russell Tom The expansion to high speed rail is thinking outside the box. It involves so many 

factors in our lives. Fuel savings, better air quality, less highway traffic, alternative choices for travel, safer way to travel. We must make decisions that don't always fit the profit picture for BIG businesses. 

Russell Nancy I have read the article in the Dallas Morning News on April 1, 2013. My comments: 

This is a great idea. It will only work, however, if you include the following: **You need a means for people to have transportation at the destination. Solutions could include the following: 1. Have a significant increase in Texas Oklahoma public transportation (very expensive) 2. Have the ability to "ferry" your car to the destination on the train. (expensive) **3. Have a fleet of small commuter cars at each destination for passengers to rent at a nominal cost and for a short time period (e.g. $15/per 24 hours with a limit of 5 days....with the purchase of a railroad ticket) (least expensive) **This is the BEST solution for Texas and Oklahoma because of the culture of the states with little experience in public transportation and sense of independence. 

Rusteberg Fred The possibilities of mass transit/passenger rail traffic by utilizing existing rail 

infrastructure between Brownsville, The Rio Grande Valley, Laredo, and Oklahoma 

City need to be strongly considered and pursued as a viable and necessary means of transportation in our future. Especially as the population continues to grow and strains on our operation of motor vehicles and corresponding highway infrastructure construction and maintenance continue, together with negative effects to the environment and compromises of quality of life issues, we need to pursue and provide alternate and cost-efficient options relating to mass transit. Utilization of existing rail to help accomplish this must be pursued. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Sakach Bill I am a big supporter and user of trains. When I visit San Francisco for my work in 

sales I always take CalTrain down the peninsula to visit my customers in the South Bay. When I lived in Chicago I would take the trains to cities outside the metro area. If it’s fast and on schedule business and families will use it. You can work on email on the train or read books rather than the stress of driving. It so reduces traffic congestion on roads and helps with air Quality by moving a greater number of people with less energy too. Please put high speed rail in TX. 

Salinas Orfa L I want to let you how much having rail service means to me. Since moving to Dallas I 

have been using the DART system and have been able to get to my VA medical appointments. With the cost of gas and an old car I really appreciate being able to get to my many doctor and other appointments. I don't have a big income just my job disability and my veteran benefit money so I can't afford to go visit my Mom who is 92 years old and lives in South Texas. If we had affordable rail service in all parts of Texas we could get the benefits that Dallas citizens know and appreciate to all Texans. Rail systems take a lot of drivers off the streets and highways. That means less accidents, less gasoline being used and less parking problems. Looking for parking results in more accidents, more pollution and more money for gasoline that poor folks don't have. 

Salinas Silvia My family, friends, coworkers and I like to travel to San Antonio, Houston, Austin or 

Dallas. We would loovee to be able to travel by train to all of these cities and all over the United States too! My friends and I travel to all these cities very often so if we had train transportation we would take it all the time. We love trains and love to take care 

of our environment! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Salinas Ricardo A. I saw the study for the passenger rail service and I think it would be a great idea, only 

if the people of Laredo would open up and change their routine of doing things. Recently I went to San Antonio with my family to Fiesta Texas and we had a great time. The most difficult thing was coming back extremely exhausted and fighting to stay awake. The issue of having to wake up very early in the morning and then to drive 2hrs, spend the whole day and then drive back; as a father is mind bottling because of your family's safety on the way back. If the rail service can work around providing families with a trip, where they can get off in San Antonio, Austin, Dallas or any other city on the way with rental cars accessibility or transportation to places of interest, at reasonable prices, I think it could work. I rather pay up to $200 for a family of four for a round trip on the train where I know at least we will get back safer and not having to fall asleep. With gasoline prices, a round trip will cost you about $150 for gas, so for an extra $50, I rather pay it and get some rest on the way back on a train and get home safely. Thanks Ricardo Salinas 

Salinas, Jr. Gerry As a small business owner and resident of Laredo, Texas, I believe a passenger rail 

service that ran from up and down IH-35 from Oklahoma City, OK to Laredo would be a tremendous boost to business, commuter safety and overall standard of living. Below are 4 reasons why I would strongly support the construction of a passenger rail service. 1.) The Eagle Ford shale boom is expected to last for decades in South Texas and with it hundreds, if not thousands of additional vehicles will be traveling up and down IH-35 to satellite offices in Laredo or San Antonio (which are the closest major cities to all the development). With the Eagle Ford shale boom expected to last for 30, 40, 50 years it would be wise to eliminate passenger traffic and alleviate the congestion (and wear and tear) on this very important roadway. 2.) Every year thousands of Mexican shoppers travel up and down IH-35 and bring 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments with them millions of dollars to support local businesses and stores. Making it easier for them to travel and providing them with more options would allow for an opportunity to increase business with our Mexican neighbors. 

Salinas, Jr. Gerry 3.) Mass transit is sorely lacking in the United States, and especially in Texas. If you 

visit Europe it is mind-boggling how easy it is to maneuver around the entire continent with so many different rail systems and accessible destinations. A passenger 

rail service would eliminate pollution by reducing our carbon foot print and avoid furthering climate change. It would also serve the purpose of reducing our reliance on foreign oil and allowing the U.S. to better control its energy future. Any step that gets us closer to energy independence and reduces money sent overseas (particularly to people who do not support our American values) is a definite plus. 4.) Lastly, and selfishly, for my own convenience I would love a passenger rail system. I have to travel to San Antonio at least once every 2 weeks and would absolutely love the opportunity to travel by rail. Not only would it be safer than traveling by automobile, it would allow me to enjoy time with my family and friends without having to focus so intently on the road ahead. I could also use the time to catch up on work. In conclusion, a passenger rail system stretching from Oklahoma City or Dallas, and running to Laredo would be a WIN, WIN, WIN, WIN situation! 

Sandel Morris Austin needs to discourage personal transportation (one person driving around town 

alone moving a ton or so of machinery in the process). Buses and trains are the obvious solution. Reference any European city. 

Sanders John C. Having a good passenger rail system in Texas would ease traffic congestion. Help 

reduce air pollution. And improve quality of life! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Saunier C E Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced 

Sautter Bethany We NEED a rail system here! With so many people moving from out of town and out 

of state, our roads can barely handle it right now. Prepare for the future and go rail!!! 

Schas Bill I support high speed passenger rail service, and expanded cargo rail service. IH-35 is 

a parking lot between San Antonio and Austin on many occasions, and is the site of frequent injury accidents. Air quality in Central Texas is getting worse with our growing population. Any development that can reduce vehicular traffic and fuel consumption will help improve these issues. 

Schill Brian Rail service would be an asset to Texans in terms of environmental benefits, keeping 

highway traffic down, and making travel more pleasant. Some rail passengers would rent cars at their destination, too. I go to Austin, Waco and Dallas a few times a year, and I would certainly consider riding the train, since it is very tiring to sit behind the wheel for hours on end. 

Schnack Kate I would like to see more passenger rail service in Texas. I would use a system that 

could take me from Austin to Dallas or South Texas or Oklahoma. I believe that we can reduce the carbon dioxide emissions with more people choosing rail service. We could also reduce the number of automobile related deaths. I would also like to see 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments local service in Austin. I do not want any e-mails. You can call me or send me something through the US mail. 

Schoech D. I rode a train from N. Texas to Oklahoma when I was a kid. We basically have the 

same or worse train service now. Why are we so far behind? The trains of Europe are a good example of what can be accomplished with fast passenger trains. 

Schott Susan A Other than the noise issue from the trains I do believe this is a good option. Schultz Larry W. I am pleased to see Texas and Oklahoma engaged in this study on passenger rail 

service between Oklahoma City and south Texas. This would be very beneficial to 

young people more interested in less pollution, better health, and alternatives to car travel. This would also be good for people who for medical reasons cannot drive. Trains also are energy efficient which is good for the environment. 

Schultz Larry W. I would hope the study could be extended north to include at least Wichita and 

preferably Kansas City as there are a number of people who would travel from Kansas City and Wichita to Oklahoma City and Dallas/Fort Worth, and even beyond. 

Schumacher Ryan I think it's a great idea. I travel between Texas's major cities quite often, and I find the 

high volume of traffic appalling. I think an efficient, reliable train service could go a long toward relieving congestion and providing other benefits like the reduction of greenhouse gases and reduced reliance on fossil fuels. 

Schumacher Ryan A comfortable train ride could be much less stressful than an automobile commute, 

too. I think Texas has both the major cities and long distances to be a significant leader in this category. I would really like to see the state be at the forefront of a 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments positive change for once. 

Schwedes Chris Texas is a huge state composed of Austin, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio metro areas. 

These metropolitan areas are separated by large distances that many Texans cover in passenger cars and worst yet full size pickups on a day to day basis. Putting in place a 

functional, efficient, and speedy passenger or multipurpose rain line just makes sense. 

Scott Susan Please please please do all you can to provide Texans with an alternative to driving or 

flying when we need to travel from one city to another. Expanding passenger rail services would give us another convenient alternative. Also, not having to drive on IH-35 when traveling between Austin and Dallas would be a huge incentive to use high speed rail between the two cities. Please take into account the following points 

when considering expanding high speed rail in Texas. 

Scott Susan Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. Thanks for the consideration. 

Scott Jeremiah This would be an excellent start to a statewide rail network. PLEASE MAKE IT 

HAPPEN! 

Scott Joshua What high speed technologies are being considered for this project? I am concerned 

that this will just be an opportunity for a manufacturer to offload outdated inventory, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments rather than a state-of-the-art rapid transit alternative. 

Searcy Wendy I agree that this would be a great thing. Sebolt Terry I wanted to weigh in and give my support for the expansion of high-speed, light rail in 

Texas. I am a native Texan, and I love our wide open spaces and our open highways. 

However, as our population grows, those spaces slowly disappear. Our highways are no longer avenues for adventure, but instead are becoming an overcrowded, noise and pollution-filled wasteland. They cost more to maintain, and the numerous slowdowns and accidents are costly to each of us on a personal level. When I lived in Europe, I saw how efficient and easy a rail system can be. The German rail system was particularly pleasant and efficient. The general populace used it regularly. It was clean, inexpensive, and had few scheduling or mechanical problems. Natural areas were preserved, money was saved, and the people were well served. I would like to see something similar happen here. I know it is possible. I know it is in our own best 

interests. It is a much better alternative to just building more and more roads. Thank you. 

Sederholm Gwen Let's have more trains and fewer cars. Segura Jade Is the closest to east Texas in Dallas or would go closer this way? I live close to 

Shreveport Louisiana....(By I20) 

Shadowen Robert I support adding high speed rail in Texas. We often drive to San Antonio for various 

family activities, and if we had a reasonable alternative to driving we would certainly 

utilize it. I also have family near Oklahoma City, so could also use the train for family travel to/from there. I am in favor of developing train travel because it is environmentally beneficial (more efficient than driving cars), it is a great way to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments travel since it is less stressful than driving or flying, and especially with high speed rail the travel times are competitive. Probably like many we have traveled by train mostly in Europe and China, and really enjoyed it. 

Shafer Chrysteen I would like to see the development of the light rail system proposed by President 

Obama a few years ago. It would be wonderful to see our country make progress toward a more sustainable and livable future by revamping the long-distance public transportation options. Like the Conservation Corps last century, investment in our infrastructure helps relieve poverty now while improving the quality of life for generations to come. 

Shaffer Tria RE: Train route for S. Texas I am in favor of extending rail service to S. Texas. It will 

get cars off the highways, relieving congestion and reducing tailpipe emissions; it will get noisy, polluting planes out of the air; it is safe; the train is fun and stress-free. 

Shaffer Tria I have reviewed the proposed route and have a suggestion: Why is Houston not 

connected to Austin? It would be so nice to hop down to Houston, go to the museum district and get home in one day. Austin and Houston need to have a direct connection that doesn't go through San Antonio. Thanks for taking my comments. 

Shallenberger Vonnie I live in Fort Worth, which has a very sad example of public transportation for a city 

of its size. The world is changing, and Texas needs to be ahead of the curve in providing fast, clean public transportation to all the places that both residents and 

tourists would like to go. Not to mention the benefit to the working class...better public transportation would pay for itself in clean air and tolls in no time! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Shamel Charles Public transportation is desperately needed by Texas' growing population. High-speed 

trains are very fuel efficient, safe and clean. My wife and I wide and love Amtrak and would like to see expanded service between all major cities in Texas. 

Sharpe Fran Rail service throughout Texas would be very helpful in that it would reduce the need 

for more inter-state highways, etc., and probably provide faster and safer travel and maybe even cheaper in the long run. 

Shelton Christine Texas definitely is in need of a mass transit system. I live in Denton, TX, and traffic 

has become a problem with the growth of Denton. I was raised in Connecticut with a mass transit system that was easy for people not to have cars and you could go to work in New York every day and be on time. Building rails across Texas, Ok., is a great idea for the traffic problem, and to allow people to travel more freely due to the rising cost of gas. 

Shepherd Keith We need additional rail service in our great state to help relieve roadway 

overcrowding. Parts of the local IH-35 corridor have not been upgraded since it was built in the 50's, regardless of it being called the NAFTA freeway. Light rail would ease peoples commute to work and many would use it to save on the costs associated with personal vehicle ownership. Having been to the Netherlands, France, Germany and Belgium recently and seeing how well their rail systems work there is no reason why we couldn't have it here too. 

Shick Taryn I think a passenger rail option across Texas would be excellent. It could eliminate 

much of the traffic congestion that is currently a regular event. It could reduce costs to individuals while increasing revenues to state and city budgets. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Shick Taryn It would reduce emissions from cars, improving air quality and other environmental 

factors. But please be considerate of wildlife areas when building the rail and be sure to take proper precautions to avoid displacing wildlife from their homes. When that is not possible, please relocate the wildlife to another, similar habitat. 

Shrek Kamel Hi, I am writing in support of Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail, because I think it will 

be a very good idea to connect many cities. It will be good for tourism and it will provide many jobs. 

Shrek Kamel Also, it will save fuel and lives by less accident on the highways. It is an important 

economical transportation needed by many people. 

Siano Christiaan Improving and expanding the rail system in Texas, especially along the IH35 corridor 

would provide safe alternative to driving. I use this route between Austin and Dallas on a regular basis. Although there is much work being done to expand the IH35 corridor, and I understand that will take time, it is nevertheless in a state of perennial congestion, somewhere along the line, very often do to traffic accidents. Expanding it alone will not eliminate the safety factor. We still have thousands of people on the road who have to be alert, pay attention, not be distracted on cell phones or texting or kids. A rail system would provide a safe, effective, economical, and efficient alternative. Therefore, I fully support this high speed rail project. 

Sibley William YES, YES,YES! AN IMMEDIATE YES TO THE TEXAS - OKLAHOMA 

PASSENGER RAIL! 

Simmons A. D. I do not understand why any study of potential passenger train service in Texas would 

not include an examination of the DFW to Houston corridor as a natural part of the 

process. I'm all in favor of expanded service OKC to Laredo/Brownsville/Corpus 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Christie, linking through the DFW area, and also connecting DFW to Kansas City and St. Louis through OKC, Wichita and Tulsa, and Springfield. All of these options would be enhanced if connections or through service direct to Houston were also available. DFW makes a very good natural hub, with service to El Paso and Amarillo/Denver heading off in one direction and trains to Houston and the Texas Rio Grande region in the other. Service to New Orleans via Shreveport would also be potentially viable. By varying the starting point of a train between Dallas and Fort Worth, depending on which direction it was headed, a high frequency of intercity trains between those two points could be achieved linking the two nodes of the metropolis together. Texas should also consider promoting an additional long distance daily train route linking DFW to Washington DC via Jackson MS, Birmingham AL, and Atlanta GA. A train on this route could also be extended to Los Angeles via El Paso. Please consider expanding the scope of this study to include DFW/Houston options. 

Simpson Christina I am in favor of high speed rail between Oklahoma and South Texas. Rail travel is a 

beneficial alternative to automobile travel and I would like to see it expanded. 

Simpson Katie I live in Dallas, and the Light Rail system is very popular here both for commutes and 

for pleasure travel. I have friends who spent their anniversary taking a train down to San Antonio and back, and they were delighted at just how low-stress the travel was compared to taking a plane. I really believe there is a market for a high-speed rail that connects Texas and Oklahoma, possibly running in a sort of parallel to IH-35, and I 

hope that you will not make the same mistake DART did with its bus lines, waiting until the demand hits a certain point before making it happen. (The DART buses have been in an awful catch-22 where DART cuts service because fewer people are riding, but then the reason fewer people are riding is that the reduced service makes it hard to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments get anywhere meaningful in a reasonable time.) 

Sitters Jake D I don't have a problem with high speed rail. I say, include high speed rail from San 

Antonio to El Paso. For me, at age 83, that's a l0-hour drive. Re the responses, Yes/Si and No/No, isn't it a bit redundant? EVERYBODY in Texas, including those who speak only one language, knows either one. 

Skaggs Jim This is an extremely ill advised expenditure of tax funds. The potential ridership and 

benefits are too little land the cost are too much. We do not need a $14 million study to show it is not cost-effective and, therefore, cannot be sustained. It seems that every time an entity creates an organization, such as TxDOT's rail organization, it gets out of control and becomes an advocate with no checks and balances to provide balanced alternatives analyses. For the cost of this potential rail, substantial roadway improvements can be implemented which will serve orders of magnitude more travelers without huge taxpayer subsidies for every rider. Roadway improvements would enhance overall quality of life for many times more people. There are no examples of successful passenger trains in similar US area as the one being studied. The North Atlantic corridor has about the only reasonable US train ridership but it's corridor population is far greater than the Oklahoma-Texas corridor, with much shorter riders. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Smetak Roman I’m one of those goddam wanna know it alls, so tell me all about it and don't harm the 

environment, don't screw up anything use rick perry’s land but don't pay him a dime or anything because he's a criminal, and has stolen enough from the Texas taxpayers already. 

Smith Rolando This is the best news that this region has received re: public and intercity transport. 

Why the delay? 

Smith Rolando Undoubtedly, this Passenger Train Proposal is long overdue. I cannot see anything 

other than success resulting from this project. I believe that rail company(s) would be 

surprised at the positive and profitable response from the public as you offer this as an 

alternative form of transportation. 

Smith Luvada I would like to add my name to the Texas/Oklahoma study and to request 

consideration of a similar study of Texas/Shreveport, LA(soon) 

Smith Myra I moved from NY to TX last year. I miss the availability of public transportation. I 

hate that I have to drive everywhere I want to go. Even the DART is not especially convenient. When I see all of the traffic on 30, 20 and 35 at rush hour, I think why not a commuter rail system. I do wonder if Texans would embrace it as well as those in the Northeast. Commuters do give up some freedom of movement and do depend on schedules. But seeing so many single drivers in huge trucks -- it is bad for the environment and bad for the human soul to be stressed in traffic for hours. 

Smith Sue It will be difficult to get Texans out of their personal cars. So it is either make all 

highways 20 lanes wide or use mass transit. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Smith Shelley Please increase availability of rail service in Texas. Smith Ellen B. I support the higher speed passenger rail service between Oklahoma City and South 

Texas. •Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. 

•A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. •South Texas has no passenger rail service. •The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers •Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. •Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. Please adopt this. Thank you! 

Smith Terri Texas residents would benefit from a high speed train that connects Oklahoma to 

Dallas, then, Austin, San Antonio, and Houston. Highways and interstates are overcrowded. The environment needs a break from single family passenger cars. 

Smith Terri Air travel is too costly for many residents. Trains will be a job creator. Older 

population will spend more on local trips if they can travel without driving (which can be dangerous for older drivers.) 

Pugh Dan President Obama has articulated a plan -to make passenger rail service available to 

80% of the United States population. The combined populations of all the cities and their environs listed above total something approaching 80% of Texas total population. It follows that to come close to meeting the national goal, rail service 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments would have to be extended to all of the Texas cities listed above, and a few more. 

Pugh Dan PRIORITY ONE: SUNSET LIMITED DAILY FREQUENCY 

Three times a week in each direction may not be sustainable for the Sunset Limited. The schedule is confusing to the public and financially expensive per passenger seat mile for the operator. Maintenance and overhead costs are relatively fixed when they could be divided by more trains whistling by. The Sunset Limited is part of the Amtrak national passenger rail network and is one of only two trains in the country 

which operate less than daily. The current Sunset Limited functions with moderately 

high occupancies. The obvious solution: daily service. Having daily east-west passenger rail service across Texas would be a major convenience to the public and would improve commercial ties to and between Houston and San Antonio. 

Pugh Dan Concept 

Return of daily service all the way from California to Florida would be the best approach. In the absence of that, on a temporary basis the service improvements could be limited to Texas and Louisiana. By such an interim plan, the present three-times-aweek service could be left in place while passenger service on the other days of the week is instituted across the more heavily traveled central portion of the route. Presumably this would include at least the segment between San Antonio and 

Houston or, preferably, the larger portion between El Paso and New Orleans. 

Pugh Dan One pragmatic way to approach expanding service is to ask how much could be 

achieved with the addition of a single train set. Good question Given the current 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments three-day-a-week schedule, there are four days with no service. The trip between New Orleans and San Antonio is a daylight run of about 15 hours. In a week, a single train set could make this run three times each direction and have a day left for maintenance. This works. The new train set would operate westbound on Tuesday, Thursday, and Sunday. It would operate eastbound Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday. This scheme would instantly double service on the Sunset Limited between New Orleans and San Antonio from days a week to six, providing an easy way to test the incremental market and build a broader base for future expansions. 

Pugh Dan PRIORITY TWO: BIGGEST CITIES IN TEXAS 

How can this be? Dallas and Houston, the two biggest cities in Texas, have no passenger rail service between them. Did we say this correctly? Dallas and Houston, the two biggest cities in Texas, have no passenger rail service between them. No way to stretch out and enjoy a comfortable seat, a good meal, or a cool drink. 

Pugh Dan This is -a market waiting to be tapped. The present volume of people disembarking 

T116 Texas Eagle at Longview and continuing on to Houston or Shreveport by bus demonstrates the demand. Additionally, an intermediate stop in College Station I Bryan would tap the large college travel market. 

Pugh Dan Concept 

On a trial basis, one train set would be enough to make the round trip every day from Houston to either Dallas or Fort Worth. Overnight maintenance activity could be scheduled at either end. However, Houston might be the preferred location so an early morning run could be scheduled to Fort Worth to make connections with the Heartland Flyer and Texas Eagle. One train set dedicated to such a limited 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments experimental route could make the trip each weekday and still have the weekend left for maintenance if necessary. 

Pugh Dan The strong expectation would be that justification for a second frequency in each 

direction would be. demonstrated early on. A decision on this, however, needn’t be considered until there are statistics in hand. Once the route is firmly established, northbound and westbound extensions on to Chicago (called Super Chief) or West Texas (called Canon Ball Express) could be studied. Fort Worth seems to be the logical long-term hub for the Texas Eagle, Heartland Flyer, and proposed future passenger service, although there might also be lesser hubs at DFW Airport and/or Dallas Union Station. 

Pugh Dan PRIORITY THREE: IH-35 CORRIDOR INCLUDING SOUTH TO THE BORDER 

Passenger trains are often hailed as a way to relieve overcrowded freeways. So, where is the most overcrowded freeway in Texas? No question, it's Interstate 35, even with the Texas Eagle already running parallel to this route. Extension of the Heartland Flyer also along this route is urgently recommended. lt would provide a second frequency along this congested corridor and also provide direct train service between 

the state capitals of Austin and Oklahoma City. 

Pugh Dan With both the Heartland Flyer and Texas Eagle traveling parallel south to San 

Antonio, there would be more relief to the IH-35 corridor and opportunity to respond to increasing congestion in Laredo and the Lower Rio Grande Valley. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Pugh Dan Some old timers might remember the day when both the Missouri Pacific and 

Southern Pacific- operated daily passenger train service to the Lower Rio Grande Valley. The need remains. Corpus Christi, McAllen, Harlingen, and Brownsville could each justify having end-point stations for passenger trains. However, since Harlingen is between McAllen and Brownsville, is on the existing main rail line, and 

has a downtown passenger train station still in good structural condition, it is recommended as the initial southern terminus. From there, convenient bus service is available to the 1-est of the Lower Rio Grande Valley and northern Mexico. 

Pugh Dan PRESENT STATE-WIDE SERVICE 

Texas has three inter-city long-distance passenger. These trains are operated by Amtrak on Union Pacific and B.N.S.F. tracks. In addition, a growing number of metropolitan areas supports excellent local commuter trains. However, these local facilities utilize much different train sets than the long-distance overnight trains discussed in this report. (The combination of long-distance passenger trains with sleepers and local commuter trains with frequent stops enhances the viability of both, although present recommendations are focused just on long distance routes.) 

Pugh Dan Corpus Christi is about midway between San Antonio and the Lower Rio Grande 

Valley and, as an intermediate stop, provides even more justification for the route. 

Pugh Dan Likewise, in pro-Amtrak days the Missouri Pacific provided passenger train service to 

Laredo with the Aztec Eagle. It’s time to restore this tradition to the rapidly growing 

border town. 

Pugh Dan Concept 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments It is possible that either the Heartland Flyer or the Texas Eagle could be extended south from San Antonio to either Laredo or Harlingen. For reasons of scheduling daylight stops, maintaining a six- hour headway, meeting the Sunset Limited in San Antonio, and not disrupting the Texas Eagle -present schedule, this looks like possibly the best configuration: (Pg 4-5 of attachment Schedules) Such a configuration would not interfere with a possible ultimate extension of the Heartland Flyer form Oklahoma City to Kansas City. 

Pugh Dan The Sunset Limited operates three times a Week in each direction between Los 

Angeles and New Orleans. The trip takes about 47 hours. The portion from El Paso to Beaumont takes 23 hours. Texas intermediate stops include El Paso, San Antonio, Houston, and Beaumont. The train consist provides bi-level coaches, sleeping cars, dining car, and lounge car. 

Pugh Dan The Texas Eagle operates between Chicago and Los Angeles three times a week in 

each direction. The trip takes about 75 hours. On the portion of the run between Chicago and San Antonio the train operates daily in about 32 hours. In all cases, the Texas intermediate stops include San Marcos, Austin, Temple, Waco, Fort Worth, Dallas, Longview, and Texarkana. This Texas internal portion of the run takes about 15 hours. The train consist provides bi-level coaches, sleeping cars, dining car, and lounge car. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Pugh Dan Texas’ five busiest depots lie along the Texas Eagle route. They are Fort Worth 

(141,696 ONIOFFS in FY12), San Antonio (70,161), Dallas (55,764), Longview (49,126), and Austin (41,638). The Fort Worth inter-modal station serves as an interchange between the Texas Eagle, the Heartland Flyer, and local buses-. The San Antonio depot serves as an interchange between the Texas Eagle and the Sunset Limited. Dallas Union Station is an interchange between the Texas Eagle and local buses. The Longview depot provides access to long-distance buses to Houston. This 

fact helps demonstrate the need for Dallas - Fort Worth area train service to Houston. The Austin depot is downtown in a city drawing large -numbers of visitors. 

Pugh Dan The Heartland Flyer operates daily between Fort Worth and Oklahoma City. It makes 

connection with the Texas Eagle at Fort Worth. The trip takes about 4 hours. The train consist provides bi-level coaches and a cafe car. 

Pugh Dan PASSENGER RAIL GOALS 

Passenger rail service in Texas is an important component of the public transportation network. 

Pugh Dan Reliability, comfort, convenience, cost effectiveness, connectivity, and safety are all 

important parts of the program. To provide these features, three guiding principles are required: l. Intermediate-term, the passenger rail network must provide service Statewide. It is 

easy to think of a network grid with interconnecting nodes in the major cities, including both clockwise and counter- clockwise movements around the Texas triangle. Extensions would continue to be made until 80% of Texas population has rail 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments service. 2. Long-term, the passenger rail network should provide at least twice-daily service each way around the Texas triangle. This is required for both convenience and connectivity. Creating convenient connections throughout the system is not possible with less than twice daily service on at least this core hub. 3. High-performance train sets and track maintenance are required for good service. Train sets must include long-distance and over-night facilities with dining and 

entertainment amenities. Track improvements must support reliable operations and faster trip -times. 

Pugh Dan SHORT-TERM STRAIGHT-FORWARD SOLUTIONS 

Fortunately, this is not rocket science. However, it requires a series of improvements based on. the obvious need to move more and more people with less and less fossilfuel consumption. This is where passenger rail succeeds the best. 

Smith, Jr. Paul J. I support strong improved passenger rail service along the IH-35 corridor. Any 

upgrade to the existing intercity passenger rail service, which consists of the Texas 

Eagle and Heartland Flyer, should use existing facilities where possible. However, even if the existing rights of way are used, they will require extensive upgrade. Initially, at least, the goal should be to upgrade the existing service to 110 to 125 mph service. This would be a significant improvement over the current snail paced trains. 

Smith, Jr. Paul J. Most importantly, however, is to increase the frequency of the trains. One or two 

trains a day will not cut it. Equally important, the stations must be upgraded. As it is, most of them have limited parking and few if any services. Whether so-called high 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments speed rail service is appropriate is debatable. It is much more expensive than upgrading the existing system to 110 - 125 mph service. The users should pay for the service; it should not be underwritten by the taxpayers. Is this doable? Many of Amtrak's short corridor and state supported trains come close to covering their operating costs and, since they are hoisted by other carriers, most of the embedded capital costs. The hoist railroads claim that Amtrak does not pay its fair share of the costs to hoist its trains, which is a reasonable argument, but there is a high probability that the users could cover the host of an upgraded IH-35 corridor, especially if the upgrades are limited to 110 to 125 mph service. Again, it is the really high speed stuff, built on dedicated rights-of-way, that drives up the cost. 

Smith, Jr. Paul J. Another step that would be helpful for passenger rail in an expanded IH-35 corridor is 

to implement policies that would show motorists the true cost of driving. As it is they only see the cost embedded in the federal and state fuel taxes, which cover only the cost of the federal and state highways. If the costs of local streets and county roads were embedded in the price of fuel, instead of property and other taxes, many motorists might be persuaded to take the train instead of the family buggy. I am a serious rail industry supporter and passenger train user. I own stock in several of the 

nation's railroads. In addition, I have ridden over every mile of Amtrak's system with the exception of Chicago to New Orleans and Portland to Boston. I read Amtrak's financials, as well as those of the companies in which I own stock, regularly. I have more than a passing interest in improving passenger rail along the IH-35 corridor. 

Snyder Jo Hill Rail service from Oklahoma City is an emerging need for me personally. I can travel 

to visit my children and for events in Dallas/Fort Worth safely, economically and conveniently. One thing I would appreciate is an easier step-up from the platform to the train. I am considering a rail vacation. Besides personal reasons, I appreciate the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments environmental contribution of rail travel. It improves air quality and reduces the impact on our overcrowded highway system. I believe increase in rail travel will eventually decrease the need to tear up more land for highways which effects wildlife, water and other endangered plants and animals. 

Sokolic Kathy I don't know why we don't have more active passenger trains. The time for America to 

move away from the personal car is now. Let's get more rail!! 

Solano Alexander High-speed passenger rail would be a fantastic way to cut down on both intra- and 

inter-city commute traffic, reducing air pollution and traffic and generally making Texas a nicer place to live thanks to less cars sitting on the freeway. Texas is a big state and I travel south from Fort Worth to Houston or San Antonio frequently; a rail alternative to driving on the interstate would save time, money, frustration, and environmental impact for me and thousands of other people who have to travel across the state. 

Solano Nicole I live in South Fort Worth and there are no options for public transportation. I would 

like to see more options like a light rail system that gets everyone around the DFW area. 

Soto Minerva I will be very pleased if the State will open Railway service as indicated. Thank you Souza Tina Allen My comment is that all efforts be made to see this rail system become a reality. It is 

time for Texas to advance into the future, and what better way to do it than a clean 

way. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Spanne Joan Passenger rail is an efficient, comfortable, and comparatively low impact means of 

transit, when considered alongside flying or driving personal vehicles. I strongly favor expansion of passenger rail services over expanding highway capacity in our most traveled corridors. When making choices among travel options, rail is the first option I consider for distances between 1 and 10 hours distant by automobile. 

Sparks Ron If anything will help increase the services in South Texas then expand the Amtrak line 

from San Antonio to Corpus Christi and further south to the valley. 

Sparks Carole I am very much in favor of expanding high-speed rail, not just from OK to TX,TX but 

throughout the states. It is very much an efficient method of transportation and gives alternate means of travel to those who otherwise might not be able to travel those long distances by car or bus. Please give this proposal your highest priority to implement! It's a project that I feel is well past time to achieve modern/progressive/ options for travel. Thanks for considering the project. I had almost given up that my dream might become reality. 

Sperling Beth I have taken the Heartland Flyer to and from OKC to FTW a number of times and 

absolutely love it! Any improvements and additions would be wonderful! 

Spitzack Kalee I'm in favor of better public transportation. It will reduce GHG emissions by getting 

people off the road. It will also reduce traffic and improve air quality. 

Stangel Jr Frank Please make the train from TXTX to OKC possible, eventually branching out to 

various cities on each end. Thanks. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Stanley Lars Any increase in rail transportation is very desirable to me, particularly along the IH35 corridor. The proposed rail line from South Texas to Oklahoma is a good 

expenditure of tax funds, much better than spending it on more freeways, which have 

become congested beyond usefulness. Thanks. 

Steele Debra My big concern would be how would this fast rail be paid for? As a single older 

woman, I am having a hard time with the rising prices, taxes, and with less pay! Depending on how this rail would be financed, and the expense to taxpayers -- if the costs are NOT being put on us, then I am all for it. Where the rail is... is, of course, another question. Why can't this rail go to New Mexico and Colorado? I would think those would be more popular places to go than Oklahoma? 

Sterling Janice I hope we get high-speed rail and that it continues up to either Wichita or Tulsa. Air 

quality is better when using rail as opposed to vehicles or airplanes. If rate of speed were fast it would be competitive to airplanes. Could use existing rail easements. US is woefully behind Asia and Europe for high-speed rail I support this passenger rail plan 

Sterzing H. Keith 

Mephodie 

High speed rail to all major cities is an essential component of any 21st century 

transportation plan! Please approve and proceed as rapidly as possible! 

Stewart Ruth The adage of "build it and they will come" seems to apply to road increase and 

proliferation of traffic The destruction of vast swaths of land required for roads affects 

the ecology of the area, the business (for better or for worse) and the habitation of wildlife. The polluted air resulting from the innumerable vehicles increases health issues for involved. Seldom is there a positive outcome other than for construction, car manufacturers and oil companies. I would certainly ride trains to Austin and 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Dallas, were this a reasonable option. 

Stippec Rudy and 

Barbara 

It is time that the obstructionists cease their rhetoric on keeping the State of Texas from moving on with PROGRESS. There are so many issues facing Texas but the primary issue is Global Warming otherwise known as Climate Change. The obstructionists need to accept the fact, we repeat, accept the fact that Climate Change is happening NOW; they need to open their eyes to see the devastation being caused by the change in weather patterns, the worsening and the increasing of specific events such as tornadoes, storms, etc.; they need to accept the fact that human beings are causing Climate Change by spewing into the atmosphere toxic pollution, spreading toxic pollution all over our lands and continuing to allow the Big Oil and Gas Companies to pollute; and they need to bring a halt to their greed for more money and power and put all of their efforts to the good of us all instead of for the Big Oil and Gas Companies. We are in desperate need of a massive decrease in the pollution of our home, Earth. Whatever can be done to increase the health and well being of humans along with wildlife and vegetation should and must be done and must be done 

now. Time is running out on turning the tide against Climate Change. It seems that many live in the NOW and find it hard to think ahead. We are completely on board with turning the tide against Climate Change by cleaning up the air we breathe and the water we must drink; cleaning up our lands from the oil spills and toxic pollutants, etc.; and reducing the number of cars and especially trucks on our roadways, etc. One of the ways to attack Climate Change is to establish a Texas State owned and operated Passenger Railway System with Oklahoma. This would definitely be the beginning, 

hopefully of bringing Texas up to par with other states. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Stolfa Anthony To whom it may concern. I have had the good fortune to travel abroad and have 

marveled at the environmental and human efficiency that European high speed rail has to offer. For far too long we have sat in traffic tie ups from Oklahoma City to San Antonio and Houston. The Airport offers solutions for long distance travel. But for shorter distances, we are left with basically one option, the car. Like Europe, we are running out of room to build roads and place cars on them. The most efficient and environmentally friendly way to move people is through rail, as long as that rail is 

fast. 

Stolfa Anthony Too many people are dying on overcrowded roadways. The polar caps cannot absorb 

any more auto emissions. Let's please stop wasting money on overpriced roadways. Taking into account the billions spent on road construction, auto and airline bailouts, and subsidies already supplied to the companies that support those modes of transportation, rail becomes much more attractive. 

Stolfa Anthony If you consider the cost of maintenance, patrolling, traffic accidents and other factors, 

rail is less expensive. That is why Europe and Asia rely so heavily on high speed passenger rail. So much so, that they spent money on connecting England to the rest of Europe through rail under the English Channel. Once a high speed rail is established, it will be much easier and cheaper to maintain than the roads we currently take to travel from city to city. 

Stolfa Anthony Please work towards a high-speed rail service throughout the country. The immediate 

need in Texas is high speed rail from Dallas to San Antonio and Houston as well as 

north to Oklahoma City. An extension to Kansas City and Tulsa would tie the high speed rail to the national network that would link to Chicago. Rail offers options for those who cannot travel by car including the elderly and disabled. It offers a way to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments breathe easier which will improve the lives of our children. The cost of capital (borrowing) is cheap right now with interest rates at all time lows. The price of failing to invest in this infrastructure is too high. 

Stolzenburg Lucy I am thrilled that TxDOT is considering a high speed rail system from South Texas to 

Oklahoma! I am a veteran of rail travel throughout Asia and Europe. My son has moved from Texas to a city with rail and he refuses to own a car! It is inconceivable that we in Texas, a state with citizens that are always on the go, has not implemented a high speed rail! Rail is reasonably priced, uses less fuel than cars, is a cleaner method of transportation than autos and gets those cars off the road, avoiding those nasty traffic jams. 

Stolzenburg Lucy A recent study published in the Wall Street Journal found that children living near 

roadways choked with traffic had a higher incidence of autism. Given the choice of sitting in traffic on IH-35 or high speed rail, I think the student population of the IH35 corridor would absolutely pack the trains on the weekends. Let's do it and do it now! 

Stone Paula We need passenger trains! We have needed them for years; we are so far behind 

Europe in ease of travel. Trains reduce the number of cars and cut the amount of smog and pollution, but more than that, they just make travel easier. I would LOVE to be able to catch a train to the heart of all the great Texas cities. I would visit my family 

more if I didn't have to make those long, boring, dangerous drives. We NEED a GREAT train system like Europe has! 

Stowers Alan Great idea. Please proceed. One suggestion. Please make connections in San Antonio 

as convenient as possible. Some passengers may want to travel east or west. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Streever Paula We need the train/rail from Oklahoma City to Austin for so many reasons! Stubbs Chris I think we need a high speed rail for the entire country. I think we should have a high 

speed rail from Corpus Christi to Victoria TX, to San Antonio and all the way through the heartland, through OK City, to St. Louis, to Omaha Nebraska, then to Chicago probably. Just makes environmental sense. Some people don't like to fly. We don't need an oil pipeline through the heartland, we need a high speed rail through the heartland. DO IT!!!! 

Sullivan Heather I. I write in favor of rail transport in Texas! It reduces car traffic, helps air quality, and 

is a much more human AND natural environmentally friendly means of travel. The trip to Austin from San Antonio, for example, can be a nightmare in traffic--same with the trip to Dallas. But with a train, communication and transport would be so much easier and more pleasant. This is a smart choice for Texas and our future! 

Sullivan Karen M. Hi speed trains would be terrific. - Less air pollution -- Less dependency on oil -- 

Cheaper transportation -- Less car accidents 

Summerlin Jesse High speed rail is an intelligent way t transport people efficiently and cost effectively 

while minimizing pollution. 

Swafford Kathie I would like to see Amtrak instituted between Oklahoma and south Texas. The 

savings in fuel, noise reduction, safety caused by fewer cars/trucks on the roads, and transportation monies saved are important to all of us. Thank you. 

SWIERCZYNSKI 

ADAM This is a great project, please continue. The environment and human health issues 

would be lessened by this project. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Swierczynski Katie I would very interested in using this train, but strong consideration on the impact of 

the fuel used and other environmental and human considerations should be exercised. 

Syler Susan I am in favor of high speed passenger rail particularly along the IH-35 corridor and 

the IH-10 corridor. 

Ta Kiem Would be so happy to see the rail road be active and go the south Texas specially 

because I have families in the Laredo, Corpus Christi, Brownville cities. Can't come to visit them at this point because I can't drive therefore, I have to fly and it is expensive. If I have a week of vacation and the rail is available I could go and visit them in Laredo. I have friends in Wichita, Kansas City, MO therefore, railroad go to those cities would be useful too. I hope I see it happen in my life time. thank you, 

Tabor-Huerta Laura I would love to take a train to work and downtown one day. I live on Boxcar Run and 

as you can guess from that name a train track runs by it. I saw some stats and I like that trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger! Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. We have too many cars kicking out pollution in Texas its plain and simple. Thank you. 

Tabor-Huerta Laura South Texas has no passenger rail service-what a shame. The current Amtrak 

Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers!-yeah! Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and 

comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. I love riding on trains. It brings a peacefulness to my trip. It has the aura of the "old west" every time I ride even if it is a short trip. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

TANNER BRENDA Please DO extend Texas Railways!!!! I believe this would serve many purposes!! Taylor Scott Our state, and country as a whole, Invest more in rail to address our growing 

congested roads. This would create good paying jobs and give a needed alternative to 

driving. 

Taylor Keegan Rail would be awesome in Texas. Austin traffic was poorly dealt with by their city 

council previously and the congestion at some points is dreadful. I know that changing the culture to ride a rail would be difficult but it is a better investment than the Toll roads that no one uses. Dallas, Houston, and Corpus Christy have DISGUSTING air quality and even visiting over a weekend I can tell that my breathing is different. If a rail system was used the cities would have cleaner air and there would be less sickness. I would Love to see this take effect. Texas taking the lead in public transit would be phenomenal. 

Teague Susan and 

John 

All Texans will benefit by passenger train service to major cities in so many ways. Why has this option for the Texas workforce been left so undervalued and underfunded and off the table for so long. Why has there been no real logic, good science and fairness regarding real problem solving for transportation needs that the State of Texas has had knowledge of for so long? Passenger rail is logical and good science and fair and will benefit the State of Texas in so many ways including limiting traffic congestion, car accidents and will also keep drinking drivers coming from sporting events and other venues off the road. Passenger rail to major cities will cut air pollution. It keeps oil and toxic run off from roads out of our drinking water sources and saves ecological and sensitive watersheds and green areas from excessive 

road building in areas of Texas that need to be left in their natural state. It gives citizens an alternative way of transportation and enhances tourism in a less destructive 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments way. Passenger rail is enjoyable and is a long overdue mode of transportation. 

Templet Mel Commonsense to reach out to the future. Terrell Julie I am in support or more passenger rail in Texas. It will not only help with air quality 

but make the roads safer and cleaner with less cars on the Road. 

Terry Thomas Passenger rail service should be expanded throughout Texas as well as the entire 

nation. Fewer automobiles on our highways would help reduce carbon emissions and allow for another mode of connecting transportation for our growing population. I used to ride the train between Oklahoma City and Tulsa, Oklahoma, when I was young and during World War II workers could ride from areas all around Oklahoma City to Tinker Air Force Base and other industries to work. They still could be providing transportation for thousands of workers if they hadn't removed all the tracks. I support public rail service and it's expansion throughout the United States. 

Thomas Heather Joy We need high speed rail in South Texas! Thompson Michael Better and more environmentally sensitive transportation for the future. I know I 

would use it. 

Thompson Forrest R Expanding improving our rail service in Texas will help remove more cars from our 

highways improving our air quality and reducing traffic on our interstate highways. These highways are already over worked. This proposed new high speed rail will bring our state up to standards found in Japan and Europe. 

Thurstin Eric First of all, let me say that I think this study is so important to help Texas and 

Oklahoma move ahead with better rail infrastructure and more transportation 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments alternatives for people living in the metro areas that will see an increase in service. I just had two comments/questions: • Was there any interest in including a rail connection between Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston? It just seems like the two largest population centers in the state are in need of a rail connection since there is so much car and air traffic already between them. • Should the proposed rail link between Shreveport and Dallas-Fort Worth also be considered with this study? I know that's a separate initiative, but it seems like it would also impact rail service in the region should it come to fruition. 

Tiffer-Violett Darling I am so excited that this issue has come up again for consideration. Passenger rail or 

train rail running from S. Texas thru Oklahoma, would be so much more convenient for many people who commute between San Antonio and Austin (and vice versa) because of work. It would remove a lot of the traffic between the IH35 corridor, and not only the convenience 

Tiffer-Violett Darling and hopefully removal of pollutants in the air because of less automobiles in the road, 

but think about the benefits to our wildlife and air quality. I am so, so excited about this and it is my wish that it comes into fruition. 

Tingle Lisa This beautiful city deserves a rail system to protect and preserve the land, the people, 

the animals and the water. 

Tingle Lisa We have grown entirely too fast to have this many cars on our grossly inferior road 

system. It is appalling to me that we STILL do not have a rail system between the big cities of Texas. PLEASE, make this happen, for everyone. 

Todd David I strongly endorse efforts to introduce high-speed passenger rail service into Texas, in 

order to reduce fuel use, traffic congestion, air pollution, and collision risks on our 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments highways. 

Townsend Thomas A. I am for this. Complete disclosure will ensure it coming into fruition. Tracy Sarah I would welcome warmly the opportunity to take a high-speed rail line to D-FW 

Metro/Austin/San Antonio. I believe that it would improve air quality, reduce traffic, 

and have an overall positive effect on the economy of the two states. As a 13-year resident of Oklahoma (having moved here from the east coast), I love this region, but I can say that one of the things I do miss--greatly--is the opportunity to take highspeed train lines to other parts of my state and adjacent states. High-speed rail would be a great step in improving the quality-of-life for Texans and Oklahomans. 

Trecha Matthew I recently took the train from East Lansing, MI down to visit friends in both Fort 

Worth and San Antonio, taking the train between Fort Worth and San Antonio on a round-trip and then back to Michigan from Fort Worth. The snail's pace of the rail was both frustrating and not understandable when my friend and I drove from Fort Worth to Austin and saw the crazy flying overpasses being built by the state of Texas. Nowhere in the Midwest have I ever seen such expense dumped into highways while public transit is left to languish. In fact, Governor Snyder of Michigan accepted federal rail funds after WI and OH turned them down and, as a result, I enjoyed 110 

mph service between Kalamazoo, MI and Porter, IN on my way South. This high speed rail study presents the chance to make Texas more attractive to visit and live. Currently, it is much too car-centric for a recent college graduate as myself who wants to avoid car use as much as possible. The opportunity to make Texas a leader in rail should not be embraced on both sides of the aisle as it will make the state more mobile, increase inter-city business and draw new investment to the Lone Star State. I 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments hope it can come to fruition and quickly! Best of luck. 

Tremaine Lisa I approve whole-heartedly with a high speed rail system in Texas. Oil is going away. 

There are too many cars. Please provide good public transportation! 

Treuter Gina I support High Speed Rail for Texas! Please be conscious and considerate of the 

environmental impact to the natural environmental issues of the state. Thank you! 

Trevino Edward This is one mode of transportation that has been missing is South Texas for years. I 

remember back in 1964 when I returned to Laredo for leave after training in the Air 

Force I took the train from Laredo to San Antonio and then from San Antonio to Tucson AZ. This was fairly priced and a comfortable trip. It's enjoyable to take a nice trip, relax and enjoy the view. Rental cars are now becoming reasonable in pricing so once you reach your destination you have mode of transportation. I've traveled from west coast to east coast and I always prefer ground travel (driving) over air travel, only problem is you see the view but have to concentrate on driving safely. Buses are too crowded where the train provides a comfortable atmosphere. To me this idea of Rail travel being brought back is awesome. 

Trice Mary Lou Driving on I 35 is dangerous. Many wrecks every day. I don't know if it would be 

better to use rails for shipping (which would get most of the 18-wheelers off the road) or for passengers. The problems with using it for passengers is that once you get to your destination then you have to rent a car. Maybe we should use rails for both shipping goods and for passengers. 

Trice Mary Lou There is an enormous amount of toxic gasses spewing forth from exhaust pipes. This 

is impacting the health of folks that live here. Also our lakes and streams are being 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments poisoned by the exhaust fumes. 

Triplett Roy I believe the rail service from Oklahoma to Dallas would be highly used as airlines 

are cutting more service and increasing costs. OKC and Tulsa have limited flights and full planes so it is getting harder to use air travel. I feel every effort should be used to get this approved. I for one would certainly use it as a system over air travel often 

Turman Donna I am interested in seeing the further development of high speed rail not just from OK 

to South Texas but a rail that runs east-west as well. Such a rail would take traffic off the road, enhancing safety, and require less state and federal money than the construction and maintenance of additional and existing highways. I hope the rail study will help bring high speed rail to Texas. 

Turner Matt Air travel has become ridiculously uncomfortable and SLOW lately. And IH-35 

through central Texas has been a headache and death trap forever. I've been wondering why we don't have a fast train (high speed or bullet) between at least the major cities of Texas. Especially, the triangle from Houston to Dallas to San Antonio / Austin. I sure know I'd have taken the Austin - Dallas segment many times already by now. Especially now as our inner cities are getting more populous, trains make more sense, on so many levels. 

Tuttle Suzanne I support the proposal to bring high speed rail service to the Texas-Oklahoma corridor 

and beyond, particularly if it can be constructed within existing corridors. Having this option will take vehicular traffic off our highways 

Tuttle Suzanne and help improve air quality, plus could spare undeveloped wild lands from the 

creation of more roads, thereby saving wildlife habitat and preserving water quality. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Thank you. 

TX The future of America and its citizens require us to move forward with technologies 

that are energy efficient, sustainable and environmentally viable. Mass transit is one of those technologies. 

Ugalde, Jr. Guillermo R. I am very much supportive of this railway system! It is needed in our area and will 

help decongest the automobile traffic on the IH-35 corridor. As we continue to see an increase in population, this project is well overdue. Mass transit is vibrant and effective in every other industrial country, as well as in advanced metropolitan areas around our country. It's about time that we stop playing catch-up, and start leading in the search for proactive solution within our transit system. 

Upadrasta Suneet Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Vanderlaan Ann Expanding rail service in Texas, IF properly publicized, would improve transportation 

options, reduce traffic and the need for continuous road expansion, and encourage a more leisurely, European-style of travel sorely lacking in the US. 

Vaughan Jane I would love to see a rail system in Texas-- also, may cut down on DUI 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Verdel Tom The scope of this study should include extension of the South Central Corridor from 

Oklahoma City to Tulsa and eventually linking with rail service to Kansas City and/or St Louis. Failing to acknowledge the logical long-range goal of a transcontinental north-south route from Brownsville to Chicago is short-sighted and a mistake. TxDOT has led the way in future rail planning for the central and southwest United States. Don't stop now and don't ignore the natural future of rail growth in the US. 

Olivares Norma Me parece una muy buena idea y me encantaria tener este servicio como opcion para 

viajar. 

Vigness Jule The pollution of fossil fuels and traffic from so many citizens in private cars are 

seriously endangering many standards of health and safety. We are too populous to continue making enough road for everyone. We need public transport. I support it. 

Villalon Xavier I am in favor of the railroad concept from Laredo Texas to San Antonio Texas. This 

should have happened years ago, so I’m happy this is being considered now. Please 

make this happen!: ) 

Villarreal Maria E. We are in desperate need of a passenger train services here in Brownsville Texas... 

Please consider our growing town to establish this service: Use of the existing Union Pacific Rail corridor can be utilized more quickly, and with less expense, than establishing a new corridor. Cameron County (especially South Padre Island) is a premier tourist destination for Texans, as well as national and international visitors. Rail service to/from Port Isabel/South Padre Island will lessen roadway congestion. The Lower Rio Grande Valley is one of the fastest growing areas in the United States. The Valley’s population growth requires development of passenger rail towards accommodating future travel demand needs. The Brownsville/South Padre Island 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments International Airport has plans to extend its main runway. With the continued growth of entanglements from Mexican flights, provision of rail services to points north would reduce demand on roadways in Texas, by allowing these travelers to go north via rail. 

Villarreal Ron All for the passenger rail system. You have my yes vote... Vlahodimitropoulos 

Alex More passenger rail is needed to help with constant traffic congestion, reduce GHG 

emissions, and reduce dependence on fossil fuels. 

Vogelson Mary We desperately need more fast rail in the Texas urban corridors. The DFW area 

health, environmental and water are already suffering due to the increasing amounts of pollution generated daily. With the continued expansion of fracking and the enormous amount of traffic delays, accidents and costs due to poor transportation planning and options, our dependency on oil, gas and automobiles decreases our lives daily! Is it not possible to help increase our quality of life by reducing some of the source point pollution as well as reduce some of the unacknowledged massive pollution coming from air traffic sources by adding fast rail to the Texas landscape? Thank you. 

Voltmann Steve I am in favor of safe rapid rail passenger transport. It would reduce traffic, air 

pollution and airport noise. 

von Ohlen Beatriz I feel that train transportation is better for the environment and will reduce the number 

of cars on the highways. 

Waldrop Bob I support the concept of high speed rail linking Texas destinations into Oklahoma. I 

travel between OKC and Texas destinations several times a year, and would certainly 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments use such a service. 

Walker Molly Austin and the surrounding community is growing leaps and bounds. We need to get 

cars off the street and people in public transportation. Start using public transportation, one is amazed how much easier, less expensive, and much more pleasant. Getting to work less stressed, on time, and saving the environment at the same time. Public transportation is needed in East Austin especially. 

Walker Tom The number of stops between OKC and Fort Worth makes rail travel between those 

cities too slow for business travelers. The same is true for Fort Worth to San Antonio. Given the time it takes, rail travel is too expensive for pleasure passengers. I can to San Antonio much faster than I can travel by rail, and only at a fraction of the cost. 

Wallace Susan As a Texan with a 20 mile commute to work every day that takes at least an hour each 

way, I am in favor of any plan that will reduce the congestion, noise and pollution on Texas roads. Our road construction is 20 years behind the rampant growth and yet developers continue to get the green light to throw up more and more residential developments with absolutely no regard for the health and safety of fellow Texans. If high speed rail can reduce the noise and congestion on our over-clogged roads then I am all in favor. 

Ware Dennis Why we are so far behind the rest of the world is unknown. what is known is that the 

rest of the world is not "waiting" on the USA. Why is it so hard for us to do things that make sense.....financially, environmentally, safety, and convenience. 

Warner Jesse Texas could use as much passenger rail service it can get. I am all for rail. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Warren Mobi I strongly support high speed rail for Texas and would be a regular user if it were 

available to travel between Texas cities. High speed rail makes so much sense for our 

state for all the following reasons: Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. Thanks for your consideration 

Waskey Susan I am for high speed rail in Texas from Dallas to San Antonio, and Dallas to Houston. 

It will get cars off this extremely congested corridor, which will improve safety and 

improve air quality in the state and in the cities. The Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth areas are already ozone non-attainment areas, and Austin and San Antonio's air quality are in jeopardy due to the growth in those metropolitan areas. 

Watson Lowell I support extending rail transportation as a method of reducing CO2 emissions. Watson Thomas I support development of high speed rail between Oklahoma and south Texas which 

will help to improve air quality, human health, and traffic safety in Texas by removing automobiles from our already overcrowded IH-35, reducing harmful auto 

emissions to improve air quality and reducing traffic congestion. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Watters Jaclyn I'd love a new rail in Texas. I don't own a car and transportation around the state is 

tough and very expensive, as well as wasteful in terms of gas and the environment. 

Imagine how much pollution and gas we would save if some of my friends who drive 5 hours to see their girlfriends every weekend had another choice! Public transport is the way if the future and in my experience in Texas it is well used once in place. 

Wayland Gregory Improving passenger rail transportation inside Texas and connections to other 

destinations would be a great transportation boon to our state. The continual adding 

and expanding highways degrades our environment and is not the most efficient use of our resources. Having a true mix of transportation options would also help during peek commuter periods in and around large metropolitan areas. 

Wayland Gregory It would also help improve our air and water quality let alone not adding more traffic 

noise. 

Weehler Christian Give us more rail options so I can leave the car at home. Weller K I am writing to express the need for passenger rail and the need to extend it north to 

Kansas City. This will allow more business family and tourist traffic without the need for yet more highway lanes. Please keep moving forward on this. Thank you. 

Wells Matt All reasons noted above. Werner Brooke I would love to see more rail service throughout the state. We like to travel but are 

often limited due to time. If we could rely on rail getting us to and from destinations we would travel more often. 

Werner III Braynard H I'm strongly in favor of a high speed rail project that runs through the busy IH-35 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments corridor from San Antonio to Dallas. I don't have a strong opinion on the other segments in the study, but having spent most of my life living in this corridor and regularly travelling between cities on the proposed route, I believe this high speed rail project would significantly reduce congestion, attain high ridership and help out economically by keeping goods and people moving. Less traffic, less pollution, less lost time—That sounds like a win for everybody. 

West John Lamont I certainly support the proposed high speed rail for southern Texas from Dallas-Fort 

Worth all the way to Laredo as well as the Valley. One important consideration is the convenience of availability of other modes of transportation from the railway terminals. If I have to wait at the destination rail station for more than 15 - 20 minutes for a bus or local rail then in all probability I would opt to drive, 

Wetmore Larry I think this rail service would link S TX to the rest of Amtrak's service area and 

encourage an alternative to driving cars, thereby improving TX air quality. trains are much more efficient than cars or airplanes. 

Wheeler Diana Hello, As a resident of Texas I wanted to voice my strong support for more rail 

options! Cars and trucks are inefficient and far more polluting than mass transit - like rail. And besides, rail is just plain fun: ) Every day I bike to get my kids from school and I go right over Mopac (Loop 1). The road traffic I see is terrible, but the train is immune from that congestion. If there were more rail options, I would definitely be taking the train on more trips instead of flying or driving. For example, we drive to San Antonio at least once a month. I would absolutely pay to take a train instead. And if there were a train from Austin to Dallas or Houston, then going to those cities would not be as unpleasant a trip as it is now, by car. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Wheeler Patricia I support TxDOT plans for expanding rail transportation in TX (and beyond!). There 

are many reasons why this will be beneficial to all Texans as well as visitors: 1) Train transportation will keep more cars off the road thus benefitting the environment. 2) A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. 3) Train travel is more enjoyable and less stressful than driving. 4) Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion is reduced. This benefits 

people and our environment. 

Wheeler Patricia 5) Train travel encourages tourism because people could travel faster and more 

widely. When visiting Ireland, we were able to visit many cities from Dublin to Cork by train. This saved car rental, gas, time, and the scary experience of trying to drive on the wrong side of the road! I know I would visit Austin, Houston, Galveston and Corpus (and points north like even up to Wichita, Ks) a lot more if I didn't have to drive. Again, I will support any effort to improve train travel in Texas. 

Whitacre Craig I travel back and forth from Oklahoma City to both Dallas and Houston. The IH35/I45 drive is quite a mess on most weekends. I'm interested in rail travel. I have 

ridden the Heartland Flyer a few times. Any expansion of rail service would be appreciated and used. 

White Nancy I am in favor of the Texas-Oklahoma Rail line proposed. white Linda I am looking forward to this transportation addition it is a safe and wonderful way to 

travel. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Whitlow Mary I am all for the higher speed passenger rail service between Oklahoma City and South 

Texas. It will be a great thing for Texas! 

Whitney Eric I think I would use the train often in travelling between San Antonio and Dallas. 

Sometimes I go to Houston too, so it should be included as a destination if it isn't already. The map I saw was not clear about Houston. I would like to see light rail extended down to Laredo, too. The train would be convenient for me and many other Texans even as currently proposed, without the leg down to Laredo. I also think the train should hit Corpus, El Paso, and Brownsville. 

Whitney Eric There are far too many cars on the road now. I think rail would reduce car traffic, and 

anything that does that is a good thing. Too much land and money is used up in providing more roads and space for more damn cars. Trains aren't as noisy as cars and airplanes. I like that; there's too much noise as it is. 

Whitney Eric I don't believe trains pollute nearly as much as cars or planes do. Light rail will 

certainly cut down on car use, and also it would probably cut down on airplane use within Texas and that's good because planes are a significant source of air pollution too. Air pollution is bad in Texas--just look at how many kids have asthma--so if a train can lower car and plane usage it will lower air pollution in general and kids can breathe easier. If you get a bunch of drivers off the road and onto trains, I think it will be safer to travel in Texas just because you reduce the number of vehicles in motion at any one time. That surely reduces the chances for accidents. 

Whitney Eric Everyone hates going through the airport security routine, and besides everyone 

knows it's just theater that the politicians want so they can say they're doing something about security. Trains don't have that problem, or at least, they don't have 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments near as much of it. I would prefer a train just so I can avoid using air travel. Trains are nice because you can work or read or maybe just relax, and you don't have to worry about driving or maintaining a vehicle, or about getting a traffic ticket or any of the other related hassles of driving. You just get on the train and ride. A train would help folks who are too old to drive to get around better, and it would help people who can't afford a car but could buy a train ticket. Texas ought to think about folks like that. 

Whitney Eric Oil and gas consumption will be reduced, and that is good for the environment and for 

everyone's pocketbook. TxDOT ought to build a solar power plant specifically to cover the electrical use of the light rail system, and then you'd have nothing but a huge gain, environmentally speaking. Traffic fossil fuel usage contributes to global 

warming, and we better get smart real quick about cutting back on it. Light rail is part of the answer. Finally, light rail gives you more choices, and who is against that? Let's 

have it in Texas right now. 

Wiggins James E I am wildly in favor of getting high speed rail in Texas, wherever it goes. Mass 

transportation is always a good thing, since it has multiple benefits. It gets some cars/trucks off of the road, which improves our environmental (think clean air!) situation. 

Wiggins James E It helps people who don't have cars get from point A to point B in a cost effective 

way. Texas is a huge state, and having higher speed rail would improve its outlook in a business sense. Thanks for listening, and let's get this done! 

Wilbanks Tom I like the idea of the high speed rail line from Texas to Oklahoma which is being 

considered. I have used this in France - and it is great. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Wilcox George I think that a high speed passenger rail line from Oklahoma to South Texas would 

greatly reduce traffic on Texas highways and provide for a more environmentally friendly method of transportation for a lot of Texans. 

Wilhelm Franya We need as many means of transportation that will free up our roads and highways. 

It's the 21st century, after all! 

Wilkerson Sandra Two Questions: 

1. Why is there no consideration for passenger rail from Galveston - Houston - Dallas Corridor? 2. Where is TxDOT getting the funding to "support" the Air Traffic Control Towers? From the $50M Fleet reduction? Really? 

Williams Trudy I would like to utilize a high speed rail system to Dallas, Houston, Austin, San 

Antonio, and El Paso. 

Williams David It is my view that the study should target the use of the fastest, most modern 

passenger transportation modality at the time the rail links are put in place. We should NOT be considering using passenger rail modalities existing today. We SHOULD be looking at the maglev trains in China and European technology. Realistically, at the rate this study and actual implementation of study recommendations proceed, it will be many years before we see a solution to a problem that exists now and is just getting worse (just like congestion in Texas highways.) By the time we are ready to go, technology such as used in China and Europe will have advanced even more. For this study end up scoping anything but using the best possible future technology would be a great disservice to this country, in addition to being a waste of taxpayer funds. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Williams Judy What a great idea! I would certainly travel this way. Willson Matt I am strongly in favor of expanded high speed rail service in Texas. There are several 

reasons: * Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. * A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. * South Texas has no passenger rail service. * The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers. * Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. * Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Wilson Laura W. I am in favor of transit, alternatives to cars. I believe there are health benefits with 

walkable cities. Evidently Houston is not on the planned route, at least I see there is no meeting scheduled in Houston on that list. But I'm still very much in favor of Texas Oklahoma developing passenger rail. High speed is not nearly as important as Alternative to autos, in my book. 

WINSETT ELSA I think that is great... a passenger train would open up soo many opportunities for 

travel in Texas and Oklahoma. I my opinion it is a great impact on the economy, plus the experience of traveling on a train is one that every child looks forward too. 

WINSETT ELSA I would also like to see it routed thru West Texas, especially the Hill Country..... that 

would be a beautiful ride in a train! I hope I live to ride the train!!! 

Wolfe Christina I would like to see more high speed trains operating in Texas. Wood David I support the building of rail systems here in Texas. It makes sense for sustainability 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments development here for so many reasons. 

Wood Shelva Exactly WHERE will it go??? Wood Isabel TX needs passenger and light rail. Wood Robin I think more passenger rail options would be a great thing. If there were more mass 

transit options it would cut down on pollution, traffic accidents, travel time, personal fuel usage/costs, and be helpful to the planet. 

Wood Laurie Please make the rail a viable alternative to the options we now utilize for travel. The 

road conditions from overuse continue to deteriorate and with rapidity. I saw on the evening news yesterday that Austin is contemplating a Gondola to help solve the congestion in the city. That is quite a creative response to an old and tedious issue in a city that is heaving in its population. 

Worsham Benjamin I would like to show my support of a passenger rail system connecting Hidalgo 

County and the Rio Grande Valley to the rest of the state and Oklahoma, specifically the connection that would connect McAllen/Edinburg directly to San Antonio. 

Worsham Benjamin This would go a long way to improve the economy of the both the valley and San 

Antonio area and allow those who cannot afford to travel an affordable and timely option. 

Worsham Benjamin This would also make the proposed Hidalgo County Commuter Rail System more 

viable and give a boost to its development. The direct connection would also allow for a dedicated passenger rail line, instead of a shared freight line, which would also allow for safer and quicker travel. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Wright James A. Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Wright Robert A high-speed train along the IH-35 corridor has long been desired and needed. 

Connecting city centers, with their local transportation hubs, to other city centers will 

take much automobile congestion off the highway, provide a more relaxed and cheaper alternative for travel than either airplane or automobile, and have beneficial environmental effects by reducing the consumption of fossil fuels. This is a much 

better alternative than concreting multi-lane highways. 

Wu Jennifer Please consider including Houston in the rail study. The large number of energy jobs 

and the state-of-the-art medical center make Houston a popular destination for visitors from Dallas, Austin, and OKC. Thank you! 

Wunderlin Beverly I am in support of the construction of rail travel, particularly high speed rail. I care 

about the wildlife and the beauty of the natural environment. 

Wyman Stephen TX is prime territory for high speed rail! Yan Jeffrey S. How is the project financially justified? Yates Dick Passenger transportation is 100 years behind other areas of the USA. It is not only 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments time, but past time to get this mode of transportation available in Texas. 

Yocham Katie If planned and executed with minimal environmental impact and using renewable 

energy, this rail would be a great asset! I went to Baylor as an undergrad and would 

have utilized this a thousand times over. It just isn't convenient to have the closest stop in McGregor. Keep up the good work! 

Young Susan I support a high speed passenger rail system to run from Oklahoma City to south 

Texas. I would LOVE to be able to take a high speed train to San Antonio, Dallas or Oklahoma City. Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Zacha Kimberly I am excited about the potential of the Texas-Oklahoma passenger rail system. I can't 

wait to be able to use it. 

Zahn Bernie This will also open up job opportunities in preparation for the rail, during, and 

completion. I lived in Europe for a couple of years. I always took the rail, bus, or walked most everywhere. It was fun, enjoyable, and a way to visit with others. It also 

is a great way to organize your day. So things that we put off we can finish up. Then of course there is the internet and texting or calling. All in all, I think this would be fantastic. Please keep me posted on this! P.S. I am one of those that would like to work for the Dept. of Transportation! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Zametz James I would just like to say that I am for the proposed speed rail line to run from OKC to 

Austin. I believe that alternative transportation options are vital to America's future and environmental health. Thank you. 

Zarrella Laura I agree with a passenger rail system between Texas and Oklahoma. Having a rail 

service will help remove the number of cars on the road, lessen the amount of accidents which occur due to driving miles and getting tired. Since we already have one in place extending it to South Texas would be a great benefit. We have been asking for a Rail Service between Austin and San Antonio due to the number of people who travel to and fro for work, visiting families, attending college, etc. 

Zarrella Laura Please keep in mind this Rail Service needs to be affordable for passengers. Zeigler John Traffic congestion and pollution are only continuing to increase. Building more roads 

and manufacturing more automobiles is not a sustainable solution. We need more efficient and environmentally friendly mass transit. We are killing ourselves and the environment with our auto related effluent. 

ZIEBARTH KARL We are going to choke to death stuck in traffic if we just keep building more roads, 

even toll roads. Realistic rail alternatives will improve air quality and reduce noise and congestion -- if done right. 

ZIEBARTH KARL The key to successful rail passenger service is frequency and reliability first, speed 

second. High speed (>110 mph) is probably not realistic given RoW acquisition, center-city access, and cost issues. So, concentrate on higher speed rail (HrSR) -- reliable service in 79 -110 mph range, using as much as possible existing RoW, including shared RoW with freight carriers. The latter involves 2 major issues: protection of freight rail from excess liability, especially punitive liability which 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments makes plaintiffs lawyers salivate, by passing some form of sovereign immunity or cap on damages as reasonable levels (TX medical punitive capped at $500,000 per incident, don't know OK law). 

ZIEBARTH KARL the second is compensation on reasonable (not UP) basis for capacity on freight line 

which is used by passenger -- suggest user charge based on time/space occupied or flat rate per rev passenger mile. Frequency of service is critical variable -- for example, the daily Fort Worth - OK City train only works for round trip from OK City end -- desperately need a second train based on Fort Worth. Then, logical expansion of service would be to extend to Austin, meaning that between Austin and Fort Worth there would be 3 pairs of trains (2 being extension of Heartland Flyer service + existing Texas Eagle). 

ZIEBARTH KARL Incremental expansion of this type is far more cost effective. Concentrate new 

funding on track improvements (sidings, tie condition, rail, line and surface) and on eliminating bottlenecks (complete Valley View siding so as to improve Texas Eagle schedule and eliminate interference with UP E-W main line and reduce crossing interference at Tower 55). Second but critical issue is equipment -- breakdowns of AMTRAK stock are all too frequent, consider second hand Talgo, etc. as substitute. 

Finally, connectivity at terminals -- cross platform if possible -- is key to expanding the catchment pool. Now, relatively few potential passengers have easy or inexpensive access to rail stations. This must involve city planners, MPO, and local transit agencies. 

Zirschky Katrina I would love for this to happen. There is so very little in the way of public 

transportation down here and it would make life so much easier! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Zuniga Kevin I spent a month last summer living and working in Germany for the Army and I must 

say that the option of a public transit rail system from Texas to Oklahoma is a great idea. The fear is an initial under-investment that cannot be upgraded easily! If we're going to build a rail, open things up for private competition until the most advanced options available are on the table. If this project is rushed and standard rail lines are used (slow trains) then the likelihood that people will want to utilize them will be small. If high-speed rails come to Texas I'm certain people will commute both ways and I for one will definitely use them for vacations, etc. Good luck! 

 Amy This would be a wonderful development for Texas.  Arlo Please only build new rail with PRIVATE funds. If companies cannot make it 

profitable, then apparently not enough people can use it to justify the cost. Austin has seen too many government funded railways built with no one riding them. Not once have I see anyone waiting at any of the rail stations in our area, other than the Metro employees themselves! Enough with tax dollars going to speculative transportation schemes! 

 Bailey Rails are good for the environment, good for the economy, good for safety, and good 

for quality of life. America needs to get on board. 

 Camden Please allow bikes to be placed on train going both to and from Oklahoma.  Carmen It would be great to travel north TX in train, avoid all traffic at the highway and all 

the long hours spent in the car. Yes, if it would be available at the right ticket price, I would love to travel by train instead than by car, of course that they would have to be in place a better way of transportation once we get to the desire destination, better bus route and connectivity with places of interest.... it would be nice to travel to San 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Antonio, Austin, Corpus for the weekend without the long drive.... 

 Carol Texas lags behind in public transportation options. More people traveling by train 

would give another option in travel and keep more drivers off the roads. Even though we are a state of big oil and cars, there ARE other ways to travel and trains are a good one. There are many reasons to use trains more and private vehicles less from environmental to safety. Thank you. 

 Chris Z Please add or reprovision more rails, a direct rail for Express from Corpus Christi Hub 

to Houston Hub would be Super Fantastic. Also High Speed between hubs Dallas/Fort 

Worth - Houston - San Antonio - Austin - Corpus Christi would be great. Please grow 

a set and make this rail system happen. A functional efficient rail system was needed 40 years ago. 

 Dana Yes we want this!  David I recall just a Railway was in use back in the late 70's. A railway corridor leading to 

STX from Austin as it leads to NTX would be ideal as a traffic solution. The current use of bus as an alternative method over POV results in the same delays. The current bottlenecks in major cities on IH-35 is mind boggling. Railway was once used in the past, why were they removed? 

 David I am very much in favor of more passenger rail service in Texas. If we could connect 

our major cities by high-speed rail we would see benefits in convenience, air quality, and traffic. I recently visited Europe and was very impressed by the comfort and speed of rail transportation. Please bring it to Texas. Thanks for your time. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

 Eden I love the idea of having a passenger rail in Texas! This is something we definitely 

need! I'm hoping for a fast train, also hoping for something a little less expensive than Amtrak. I've taken passenger trains in the northeast and in England, and I've always thought: "Why don't we have these in Texas?" 

 Erin I would like to see passenger rail within large Texas cities as well as between them. 

Rails connecting San Antonio, Austin, Dallas and Houston would also be beneficial. Passenger rails would benefit Texans by improving air quality, and reducing time spent in traffic. 

 Gary I support high speed rails in Texas because it lets people have choices, reduces traffic 

and helps in our dependence from oil and gas. 

 Imelda Federally Funded? They should use the money to fund Border Patrol pay and keep our 

border safe!!! They should also fund education!!! not a train that will take jobs away from bus drivers... No, do not build it!! Bad, bad idea 

 JAIME R. Just want to say that this would be the greatest thing since the building of IH-35. 

Please approve this corridor. 

 Janet Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

 Jason Passenger rail (both high-speed and local trains) must be aggressively developed to 

offset the growing congestion along the IH-35 parking lot...I mean corridor. Give travelers multiple options like toll roads, high-speed rail and local rail or bus service, and integrate them into a system of options so that people can choose the transport method that best suits their individual needs. I've seen how transit, rail, and air transport hubs, linking large cities and small towns, worked when I was stationed in Germany. It worked because the different modes were all inter-connected. 

 Jeffery This project would really benefit the state as a whole. I hope that the investment is 

made in an intelligent manner to provide a high quality service to as many Texans as 

possible. 

 Jesse High Speed Rail for Texas!  Jim First let me say I am in favor a high speed rail system rather than the rail system that 

is being proposed. High speed would be so superior on so many levels. It seems the rest of the industrial countries of the world can do it so could the US. But any rail rather than truck or vehicle would enhance protecting the environment and air quality. It would reduce vehicle and truck traffic which will enhance safety for all. It seems to be a no brainer except for those that want to keep TX in the dark ages. If Texas leadership wants to create livable wage jobs here is their opportunity. 

 Jim Congestion on trip from San Antonio to Dallas during Thanksgiving holiday has 

become unbearable. 

 Joe I think having a passenger train to Brownsville and her Valley of the Rio Grande 

would be great. I've traveled on Amtrak throughout the country and enjoy it very much. I've taken Greyhound bus from Houston to Brownsville and sometimes the bus 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments is late or it has even broken down a couple of times along the way, if we had a train going down to Brownsville I would definitely ride it as well as some other people that I know from Houston. 

 Jose I think that rail service would be a great alternative to driving or flying out of the Rio 

Grande Valley. I think that it would help so many of us who can't afford the escalating gas prices, or the high cost of flying, in order to be able to get to visit family living so 

far away, as well as being able to finally visit museums and other cultural points of interests. 

 Kari Texas needs more rail systems!  Laura I am in support of intrastate high-speed passenger rail that mimics the European 

model of travel. I was so impressed by the capabilities of mass transit when I visited Europe, and I hope the someday the US will progress to options that allow more traveler options and benefit the environment (air, land, water, resources). There was a time when I commuted daily from San Antonio to Austin, and it was exhausting and my time was not productive. 

 Lawrence It is time to bring Texas into the future...or truly into the present when you consider 

the train facilities of other parts of the United States of America. High speed rail service is a necessary service that would benefit a majority of the people of Texas. It is time that high speed rail service is planned and implemented and not let it be thwarted once again by the "airline lobbies" that have kept this service from becoming a reality up until now. 

 Marigay Yes, let's get into the 21st century!! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Lund Mark On behalf of the Brownsville Metropolitan Planning Organization, I am forwarding a 

Purpose and Needs Statement (Attachment One) herein, concerning the Passenger Rail Study. In addition to the points outlined in the aforementioned attachment, there is another factor worthy of consideration. 

Lund Mark Specifically, provision of passenger rail service can help expedite the safe evacuation 

of elderly persons and persons with disabilities from South Texas, in the event of an approaching hurricane. This objective serves the public interest and promotes the health and general welfare of the community. The current plans or arrangements of evacuating persons via airlifts is inefficient and dependent on the existence of favorable weather conditions. (see attachment) 

 Mitzi As a Native Texan trying to get around in Texas all my life - the one highway -North 

and South- has always been obsolete. Rail is cleaner, faster, safer and hopefully comparable in transportation cost compared to auto. I would definitely use it just like I use SH130 even though I pay for its use. Let's move forward!!! but it MUST NOT degrade areas of wildlife and water quality. With all of our knowledge and sources we should be able to minimize our impact of build-out. We MUST also plan for 'no sprawl' by not commercializing along the lines....people should be able to ride while looking at land and the beautiful Texas landscape. Thanks! 

 Nathalie More train transportation is a fantastic idea and will prevent potential highway 

congestion, wrecks, and save money for the consumer. It also reduces personal stress!! 

 Peter I would very much like to see a passenger rail line built between Oklahoma and South 

Texas. I live in the Austin area, which is choked with traffic and would ride a 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments passenger train to go to Dallas and other destinations if one were available (Amtrak is impractical because so few trains run). Trains are a good alternative to auto travel and would help provide more travel options to people who do not have cars, or do not want to fight traffic. We need a real rail system in Texas. 

 Rose I commute to work from Kyle to N. Austin every day, seems I have to keep leaving 

my home earlier and earlier in order to get to work on time. I would love for there to be a commuter rail that would bypass all the traffic on IH 35 into Austin. That would be my mode of transit into work. I feel a commuter rail system would alleviate a lot of congestion, pollution and mental aggravation that rush hour traffic creates. I am concerned though, what this would mean to the environment (i.e.: cutting down trees, wildlife habitats affected, effect on streams.....) when constructing this system. I am also concerned about tax raises, we already pay high property taxes in Hays County. Thank you! 

 Ryan I am opposed to high speed rail. It is incredibly expensive and underutilized in most 

areas of the nation. It may be suitable within the state of Texas to move people from one densely populated urban area (i.e. Houston) to another (i.e. Dallas). However I see little need for rail traffic going into Oklahoma. Also there is the subject of building a rail system which will obviously require property be condemned and seized via eminent domain. This will anger many. Please abandon high speed rail as a solution to our transportation needs. It is a 19th century answer to a 21st century issue. 

 Samia Texas is getting too populated in the urban areas. Rail is a must. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

 Sandra I think a passenger train would be a great idea it would attract more tourism and that 

would boost the economic downturn we are facing here locally and it would also be a great opportunity for more jobs and an experience to travel in a train 

 Sofia With the economy in recession, this will be a great and economic way to get around. 

It is much better environmentally than cars and planes and is faster and more reliable than a bus. This is something us citizens not only need, we deserve to have something we can use like this and put our hard earned money to great use. Totally in favor of this great investment! It is about time south Texas gets something worth bragging about! 

 Teresa I support expanding the passenger rail system in Texas as a clean and efficient 

alternative transportation for public use. 

 Teri Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Mendenhall Terry We need a better rail system in Texas. Highways and air travel should not be the only 

viable options for travel between cities in and outside of Texas. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

 Tiffany I would love to have a high speed train between Oklahoma and South Texas. Here are 

some positive reasons to have one: •Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. •A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. •South Texas has no passenger rail service. •The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers •Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. •Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

 Zach MORE TRAINS!!!! Burton Angela R. When we look at the purpose of the study Brownsville, Los Fresnos, Rancho Viejo, 

Port Isabel and South Padre Island should be the preferred corridor for the following 

reasons: 

Burton Angela R. 1.Use of the existing Union Pacific Rail corridor can be utilized more quickly, and 

with less expense, than establishing a new corridor. 2.Cameron County (especially South Padre Island) is a premier tourist destination for Texans, as well as national and 

international visitors. Rail service to/from Port Isabel/South Padre Island will lessen 

roadway congestion. 3.The Lower Rio Grande Valley is one of the fastest growing 

areas in the United States. The Valley’s population growth requires development of passenger rail towards accommodating future travel demand needs. 7. The rail service 

will promote both the general welfare and economic development in the area. 

Burton Angela R. 4.The Brownsville/South Padre Island International Airport has plans to extend its 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments main runway. With the continued growth of enplanements from Mexican flights, provision of rail services to points north would reduce demand on roadways in Texas, by allowing these travelers to go north via rail. 5. In the event of an emergency the passenger rail service could effectively evacuate elderly and disabled people. 6. The rail service will provide an affordable means of travel to area residents. 

Schultz Stephen Hi, I found some excitement in your article, about extending rail service to the coast. I 

hope it’s to / thru Aransas pass (near Corpus Christi). Ee often go to San Antonio and Fort Worth. This would save our driving. as retired seniors, we have taked bus trips also. Used to enjoy the trips to dallas areas, from fort worth. We hope this does become reality. I know we have rails down here, but commercial stuff. thanks, Stephen 

Shana Horton I am looking for a map that shows all proposed rail routes with county lines and 

highways, if possible. The map on the website does not have any county lines or highways, making it difficult to tell which property might be impacted. Thank you, Shana Horton 

David Meer NBC News mentioned funds to develop a rail line from Ok to south TX, running 

through Dallas with stop in Waco. We have family and grandchildren in Waco, so we would be VERY interested in this route, depending on time, days avail, and time of this segment. 

Simmons Kevin I want to support the expansion of rail service in Texas. While on sabbatical as a 

Fulbright scholar in Europe, I had the chance to experience the convenience of high speed passenger rail. It's unbelievable that we cannot have a similar system. My wife and I plan to be at the Sherman meeting on April 2. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Cates Ann I would like to inquire on the status of a line from Dallas to Houston? I don't see 

Houston included in this study, but are there any additional studies planned that would 

included Houston on the rail line? 

Newman Marcy I would like to request a list of the stakeholders for the TXOK High Speed Rail Study 

- those invited and those that attended the February 2013 stakeholder meeting on the project. Thanks. 

Shrek Kamel Hi, I am writing to support Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail. I think it is a very good 

idea for tourism and to provide alternative economical transportation needed by many people. It will help in reducing accidents on the highways and save lives. Also, it will help the environment by using less cars on the highways. Finally, it will help creating more jobs and business for many areas. 

Humm William Please send me the studies and data that support the statements included in the Service 

Level Environmental Impact Statement for the Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Corridor, South Texas to Oklahoma City, Notice by the Federal Railroad Administration on 03/13/2013 as cited below: Projections for the Dallas/Fort Worth to San Antonio portion of the corridor show average speeds along IH-35 would drop from 55 to 15 miles per hour by 2035. The central section, via existing IH-35, is characterized by substantially higher automobile and truck volumes than any other intercity corridor in the state. These volumes are projected to increase steadily through 2035, by which time traffic volumes are projected to result in freeway speeds as low as 15 miles per hour, contributing to very substantial delays. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Camacho Monica When will they do a study for the I10 corridor? Kelly Lydia I would like to be included on emails that have to do with public involvement 

opportunities on all things transportation in the SA-BC MPO region. I'm retiring and 

won't have access to the info from work; but want to stay involved. Thanks 

Morales Mary Thank you, thank you, thank you for the possibility of getting passenger rail service to 

South Texas. I rode the train all the way to St. Louis, MO when Laredo had AMTRAK service. Since Laredo is the largest inland port in the USA, I feel that there must be a lot of potential passengers who would use the service. I have relatives in Oklahoma City, Fort Worth and Missouri whom I am sure would use the service if available. I know I would. Air travel has gotten so burdensome. I am 68 years old, white haired and have had a knee replacement. It is getting more and more difficult to deal with the TSA pat downs. I know if I had the choice of train travel or plane travel, I would much prefer the train. Again, thank you for this forum. God's best to you and all who are working on this great undertaking for the central-southern United States of America. Sincerely, Mary Morales 

Wheeler Patricia Dear TxDOT, 

I filled out your survey today on extending rail transportation in Texas but had difficulty submitting it through Survey Monkey. Usually you get some sort of "thank you for your submission, “but the form hung up. Therefore, I am sending my comments via your email. I support TxDOT plans for expanding rail transportation in TX (and beyond!). There are many reasons why this will be beneficial to all Texans as well as visitors: 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 1) Train transportation will keep more cars off the road thus benefitting the environment. 2) A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. 3) Train travel is more enjoyable and less stressful than driving. 4) Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion is reduced. This benefits people and our environment. 5) Train travel encourages tourism because people could travel faster and more widely. When visiting Ireland, we were conveniently able to visit many cities from Dublin to Cork by train. Stations were usually within walking distance to the city center. We occupied four seats facing each other with a table between them. Brilliant! This facilitated the use of laptops (which were in abundant use), eating, and game-playing 

for the children. The train was spotless and we were offered a variety of refreshments for purchase from a wheeled cart. The ticket cost was surprisingly inexpensive. We saved car rental, gas, time, frustration, and the scary experience of trying to drive on the wrong side of the road! I know we would visit Austin, Houston, Galveston and Corpus (and points north--like even up to Wichita, KS)-- a lot more if we didn't have to drive. Again, I will support any effort to improve train travel in Texas. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Oliveira Carlos The I 35 corridor is becoming a very busy highway (CARS,TRUCKS,EAGLEDORD 

SHELL PROVIDING SERVICE TRUCKS) AND THE AIR SERVICE PROVIDESUS WITH A VERY LIMITED CHOICE. WE ARE IN NEED OF ANOTHER FORM OF TRANSPORTATION, THE SPEED RAIL IS THE MOST FEASIBLE... THANK YOU 

Pichot Tom We fly to Oklahoma City about five times per year. We need high speed trains should 

we change. We also travel to Hondo Tex forty miles west of San Antonio about eight to ten times a year. Again High Speed is necessary. Tom Pichot 

Allen Marks Please include Natural Gas generating electricity into your train studies. Electric 

Heartland Flyer from Fort Worth to Oklahoma City. The Heartland Flyer extended to Wichita, Kansas. Many people from Wichita have direct flights to Dallas every day. Natural gas is our low priced resource and the industry can partner with passenger train legislation in every state. Electrical infrastructure regionally adds expense but that's the best fuel source in the long term. An environmental fast train in our region. Amtrak will have their many stops cities. High Speed trains on separate tracks going 200 mile distances. 150 mph trains is legal now, the future can add speeds. Class 9 rails are need. KDOT has to soon help Wichita getting on the DOT High Speed Rail map so the city can qualify for Federal NEPA studies. Wichita is the passenger train connector city 

between the southern and northern trains to Kansas City, to St. Louis, to Chicago. We need electric trains rolling in our region that are using natural gas generating the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments electricity. 

Monroe James I am a former Railway Mail Clerk. Moved up here from Texas in 1950. All my 

family, brothers and sisters, live in Texas and I am too old to drive. If they would put 

the train back on like it was in 1950, Newton and Fort Worth, I would be able to visit my brother in San Antonio, brother in Fort Worth, sister in Waco, sister in Houston. I have relatives all over Texas. There are weddings, graduations, funerals, etc. I would like to attend. 

Groff Horace As a former public official I am very much aware of the impact of Texas population 

growth is having on our transportation system. No one wants to increase fuel taxes, motor vehicles are mandated to be more fuel efficient and the cost of building and maintaining the highway system makes it impossible for government to keep pace with the demands for an efficient transportation system. An efficient and convenient rail system will do much to relieve the current and future congestion in many areas of our state. Rail travel will also give the traveling public another option to avoid the congestion and hassle of air travel. I urge the pursuit of this project and look forward to its completion and implementation. Texas needs a modern passenger rail system. 

Garry Susan This is a comment for the TX-Okla rail scoping study. I agree with Mickey Burleson, 

who has pointed out: Texans are not ready for high speed rail and an investment in same will prove a waste of taxpayer money, agency time and effort. Current ridership 

on Amtrak is not high and is lower than publicized figures indicate. Amtrak counts each entry and each exit as a separate rider; so publicized numbers are skewed. If current service included more trains, better facilities on board (and at stations) and 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments rates that beat the cost of gas for auto travel, then Texans might prefer the inconvenience of public transportation. If we can take our cars for the same or less money, we will. If we’re in a big hurry we will prefer plane travel. Accurate projected ridership is critical to making a wise decision about such a project, and national surveys have shown that time and again eventual usage of recently completed toll roads and rails has been much lower than predicted; so we cannot rely on ridership predictions. The most costly environmental damage of a bullet train would be the destruction of prime farmland. A new route would likely be built through the Blackland Prairie ecoregion, home of the most productive soil in Texas and the most severely impacted by development in our nation. The same projected population increase TxDOT claims would necessitate something like a bullet train would also necessitate production of more food and would require use of every inch of arable soil the world has to offer. Since all the world’s arable soil is already in production, there would be serious competition we cannot responsibly ignore for the thousands of acres a bullet train would consume. If this is to be an electric train, there would be still more productive land gobbled up by new transmission lines coming in to the route at points along the way, and this loss and construction should be factored in to overall financial and environmental costs. Because of shrink/swell characteristics of soils of the Blackland Prairie and hazards they cause to road and rail beds, soils will have to be 

removed and rock brought in to guarantee a smooth rail bed. Nearest sources for rock will be the Hill Country where further lands will be environmentally degraded. Hauling hundreds of truckloads of rock required will do costly damage to roads, many of which are county-maintained. These activities cause off-site damage which must be factored into costs and losses resulting from the project. Valuable wetlands and exceptionally rare tall-grass prairie plant communities will be destroyed and cannot be 

replaced. Wildlife on the Blackland is already scarce and impacted severely by 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments development. Corridors that permit wildlife movement to water and food will be blocked and their numbers greatly decreased. Crossings will be limited and many roads blocked because of the expense of construction. This will also negatively impact rural residents and school bus travelers. 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

Except those are good concerns, rail travel would be good for our citizens and community - great travel to OKC/DFW and good to bring others to Ardmore. 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

A more full future schedule would be helpful. 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

Don't bypass Ardmore! Thank you for coming to Ardmore! 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

City and train or just city needs to plan transportation from the train to the final destination, Lake Murray, Harry Murphy, convention center, etc. 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

Citizens do complain about the freedom engineers have to "toot their horn" for long periods of time at rail crossings. 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

If schedules permitted - riders could come to Ardmore for weekend and holiday stays. 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

Train ridership should eliminate interstate traffic congestion 

Ellis Vice Mayor Of course, building a rail but keeping it in downtown Ardmore is paramount as well 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Sheryl as keeping other rail traffic. 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

Grow the Amtrak business and go slow with regard to building infrastructure. 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

I would like to ride the train north and be able to make connections. 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

I would like to take a bike, a dog, large luggage and be able to bring back full 

shopping bags. 

Ellis Vice Mayor 

Sheryl 

Please plan for rail crossing and street repair ahead of time. 

Ardmore - Anonymous 1 

 Those who cannot drive can now travel more independently 

Ardmore - Anonymous 1 

 More activity, more businesses, more tax revenue, better safety. 

Ardmore - Anonymous 1 

 It will be positive if you leverage existing stations, those sections of towns will 

revitalize, especially with more frequent service. 

Ardmore - Anonymous 1 

 Positive - the more frequent the trains, the more positive the impact. 

Ardmore - Anonymous 1 

 Positive - the more frequent the trains, the more positive the impact. Fewer cars, 

positive impact. Look at the numbers. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Ardmore - Anonymous 1 

 At first higher speed from Dallas through Oklahoma City, Tulsa and Kansas City. 

High speed from DFW to San Antonio and Houston. Higher speed from San Antonio southward. Eventually high speed will replace higher speed. Frequency is important. We must have more than one train a day while this study is going on. 

Ardmore - Anonymous 2 

 Better, more frequent schedules would make larger, more populated areas accessible 

Ardmore - Anonymous 2 

 Minimal 

Ardmore - Anonymous 2 

 Bolster tourism 

Ardmore - Anonymous 2 

 Could reduce traffic with timely schedules 

Ardmore - Anonymous 2 

 Mass transportation helps the environment - reduces traffic 

Austin - Anonymous 1 

 Rail will bring our cities closer together and although this is not a commuter service, 

it will enable us to have more options for where we live, work and play. 

Austin - Anonymous 1 

 Rail makes it easier to visit other cities on the network besides you primary 

destination. Someone visiting S.A. can easily visit Austin or DFW. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Austin - Anonymous 1 

 It probably makes sense to serve our city centers and major airports so that we can 

divert short haul air traffic to the higher capacity rail corridor. 

Austin - Anonymous 2 

 I think that the high speed is the most viable option. Conventional trains, such as 

Amtrak, do not run frequently enough. They do not have dedicated tracks and will make it difficult to use regularly. Those individuals that. 

Austin - Anonymous 2 

 Using the electric high speed trains will be better and more quiet for the community. 

Having the dedicated tracks will provide less horn noise as the other trains shouldn't cross. 

Austin - Anonymous 2 

 Tourism will boost as visitors will be able to travel quickly to another city or state 

with minimal issues. In addition, those areas that have a weak economy can allow its residents. 

Austin - Anonymous 2 

 With this train system in place, it will lessen cars on the road which will reduce travel 

time and road repairs. Also, if bikes are allowed on these trains there will be more locations for residents. 

Austin - Anonymous 2 

 I don't really have an opinion on this. I'm sure that some resources could be affected 

by track laying, however, it will be better as it will reduce the carbon footprint emitted by regular highway travelers. 

Austin - Anonymous 3 

 Live and work in other cities like Dallas to Austin, or San Antonio to OKC, will be 

able to work, attend concerts and sporting events, and travel with ease between cities. This will boost visitors, economy and business. 

Austin - On these tracks, in addition, it will be safer as these trains don't stop as often and 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Anonymous 3 move quickly through intersections. Austin - Anonymous 3 

 To work in other locations and bring those funds back to their communities. 

Austin - Anonymous 3 

 And visitors to bike, hike, walk and enjoy other areas of the city or state and be home 

in time for dinner 

Austin - Anonymous 4 

 Air quality - electric trains run more efficiently and cleaner that electric, should be 

preferred. The more desirable the train service is, the more you reduce vehicle VMT, which is better for air quality. 

Austin - Anonymous 4 

 The questions above (on the comment form) are biased because they only ask about 

the negative impacts of improved rail service, not the positive impacts. 

Austin - Anonymous 4 

 You should definitely go with the higher speed option, at least, and preferable the 

high speed option. In order to increase ridership in any meaningful way you need to make the service fast and convenient enough that a significant number of people will 

choose it over cars or air travel. 

Austin - Anonymous 4 

 The focus should be on how to increase ridership on the rail lines, and provide good 

connections with transit in each of the cities. This is important for economic development in the state, air quality, mobility and equity in providing reasonable priced transportation options. 

Austin - Anonymous 5 

 Study should emphasize public private partnerships to improve freight mobility with 

in IH-35 corridor and provide an efficient alternative to air or vehicle travel (highway) 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Austin - Anonymous 5 

 EIS should focus/emphasize improved air quality due to reduced highway travel and 

reduced commercial passenger air travel for short duration trips between city centers. 

Austin - Anonymous 5 

 True high speed rail should be the focus of the study. Incremental speed/service 

improvements of passenger rail on existing freight rail lines is a waste of time and 

money and will not receive widespread support 

Erickson Chris I think that the route should go along IH-35 to Laredo, with the possibility that the 

train could eventually go to Monterrey, to facilitate international travel. 

Erickson Chris You should use Maglev. If is more quiet that other forms of high speed rail. Erickson Chris If the project is to be successful, it will need to induce ridership. Individual ridership 

is absolutely critical. 

Erickson Chris An elevated memorial/maglev should be used to minimize negative effects on other 

travelers. 

Erickson Chris Please do not limit your study to only studying conventional train technology, but you 

must also study maglev. It is more environment friendly. 

Erickson Chris There are 2 things this high speed rail must do to be successful. Go as fast as possible, 

as efficiently as possible in order to induce ridership. This is best accomplished by using 2 magnetic levibility (MAGLEV) system. It is more expensive up front, but cheaper/more efficient in the long run. Maglev is the future of high speed rail, and will go faster than other existing systems. A very fast train will help induce ridership, which is the goal if there is to be a future for rail transportation. The second thing is to, as close as possible, have the route closely parallel IH-35, so that drivers can see 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments the Maglev train pass them like they're standing still. This will be the most successful way to induce ridership. People driving on IH-35 should be jealous of people riding the Maglev train. 

Margolies Paul Positive impact to give alternatives to driving on congested highways. You can't pour 

enough new concrete to keep up. Just more grid lock. 

Margolies Paul Impact is negligible with existing rail in play. Strive to set medium speed commuter 

rail started with adequate frequency. 

Margolies Paul Impact is negligible with existing rail in play. Strive to set medium speed commuter 

rail started with adequate frequency. To continue "as is" is not acceptable. 

Margolies Paul Alleviate traffic, provide safe walkways, etc will be a huge help Margolies Paul More rail options for passengers would reduce pollution and green house gasses. Margolies Paul To take 24 months to complete the project on such an urgent need to move ahead 

faster should not be tolerated and is a waste of funding and time. These studies with no results have been concluded in the past to no avail. 

Margolies Paul Texas with the fastest growth in the economy and population growth, has been the 

slowest in the entire nation to make decisions and secure funding for passenger rail needs. 

Margolies Paul Central Texas from WACO to San Antonio should be the primary priority for focus. 

South section should be a low priority, less population you could expedite this by simply visiting Denver, Southern California, Portland and others and clone their 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments obvious successes and jump start faster. 

Walthall Roy Why are we (Texas) doing this study? Walthall Roy If Amtrak's SW Chief is soon re-routed from Kansas City to Wichita to Oklahoma 

City to Fort Worth to Abilene to Sweet Water to Lubbock to Clovis to Albuquerque, does TxDOT's RPDiv. Have a study in-place to have a PIRRA Texas dedicated passenger train between Fort Worth - Waco - Byron college Station-HoustonGalveston? 

Walthall Roy Should such a re-routing take place and the state of Texas' current subsidy for the 

Heartland Flyer is freed-up would it be the recommendation of the RPDiv. to TxDOT and to the governor, lt. governor, speaker and chairs of the TX. House appropriations 

and senate finance committees to redirect those funds to support the operation of such a conventional rail passenger service that connects Texas' two largest population centers? 

Walthall Roy In conjucture with the re-routing of the SW chief and as a direct result of 

sequestration - there will be a moment a release of Amtrak assest e.g. locomotives, coaches, lounge cars - also Amtrak will do away with their "switcher crew" in San 

Antonio (a great savings in money) - that affects both the Texas Eagle - Daily service CHI-SA, three times a week service SA-CA and the sunset limited no LA, which may be totally eliminated - However, the other discussion we are hearing is expanding the crescent service NYC - PHIL - WDC - Atlanta - Birmingham - New Orleans - to Beaumont, Houston and San Antonio. 

Walthall Roy If the two inner-city services were altered Texans would have both daily service to the 

West Coast (LA) to the East Coast (NYC, PHIL, WDC) and to the Great Lakes 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments (Chicago). Then if we could connect with conventional multi-service train sets DFW to the Houston Metropolitan area and a train service to serve the 3.5 million Texans in the valley (San Antonio - Corpus Christi - Brownsville) then Texas would have a total complete transportational intermodal network. 

Walthall Roy Also in relationship to routes the mid-size cities of Texas, e.g. WACO, Temple, 

Abilene, San Angelo, the valley, etc. may soon see the elimination, or severe cut-back of their American Eagle air service. The recent merger of American airlines and US Airways was chiefly engineered to save money by eliminating those very expensive and money losing feeder routes. If in the next 6-9 months these mid size cities lose their air service does the TxDOT-RPDiv. have any plans in place to have passenger rail service fill that void? 

Walthall Roy All of these events are being driven currently by sequestration and business cutbacks 

and mergers and presents to Texas a cross-croada in transportation, where without additional expenditures (only a transfer of existing funds) we can have a 1st class conventional rail system. 

Walthall Roy It has always been my goal and my political science theory (as that what I've been 

taught for 27 years) that the goal should be to 1) Have a conventional rail system in place that serves Texans; 2) Allow over time passengers to get use to riding it; 3) use highway funding to make over under passes to eliminate as many road-rail crossings 

as possible; 4) eventually as ridership increases the legislature will fund more appropriations for rail and signaling improvements and ticket fares will pay for 

additional train sets and operational cost; 5) finally before we know it along those preexisting corridors (without interfering with property rights we experienced on the trans Texas corridor how that one issue killed it) Texas will have trains running at 135 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments mph and we will have achieved HSR, without a public backlash or huge indebtedness. 

Belton - Anonymous 1 

 Rail is needed to enhance economic development, visitor experience, and residential 

travel. 

Belton - Anonymous 1 

 Rail is needed for enhancement of these aspects of state need. 

Belton - Anonymous 1 

 Rail is needed as a reliever to IH 35. Cannot build enough lane miles to accommodate 

demand, both current and projected. Multiple modes, including transit and H/B. 

Belton - Anonymous 2 

 The concept is something I support. The area not addressed today is local 

transportation at the city's services. In order for any rail system to be financially viable there must be reliable and frequent transportation from the train station to the various businesses and population centers within the municipality where the train stops. Without those services you end up with a "train to nowhere" system that becomes nothing more than a money pit. Also, to the extent possible, I favor the use of existing track and right of way. 

Belton - Anonymous 3 

 We need more passenger rail if at all possible. 

Belton - Anonymous 3 

 "Quiet Zones" in towns would be nice. 

Belton - As long as improvements are existing rail or highway rights-of-way, agriculture 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Anonymous 3 should not be affected. Belton - Anonymous 3 

 More trains mean less cars on the highways. 

Belton - Anonymous 3 

 More trains mean less pollution. 

Belton - Anonymous 3 

 This effort should start with more cars on existing Amtrak trains, then more Amtrak 

train frequencies. Incremental improvements should be done to go to higher speed, up to 110 mph. New right-of-ways should be done as a last resort. If our airlines collapse, 

then we may need to pursue new rights-of-way, but not yet. Farmers are concerned over split properties and taking of land. If it comes to new rights-of-way, use existing highways as much as possible. 

Belton - Anonymous 4 

 We need to use current rail and routes as quickly as possible to get traffic off IH-35. 

Belton - Anonymous 4 

 Need silent zones. 

Belton - Anonymous 4 

 Allow businesses to get back and forth to meeting in a more environmentally friendly 

way. 

Belton - Anonymous 4 

 It would be great to reduce road traffic. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Belton - Anonymous 4 

 Not concerned. 

Belton - Anonymous 4 

 Make current trains longer and more cars. Increase speeds as quickly as possible. 

Have more than one train per day. Go to South Texas as there is no service there. 

Belton - Anonymous 5 

 Net positive effects due to increased commerce. 

Belton - Anonymous 5 

 Rail should increase public safety by removing vehicles from congested areas. 

Belton - Anonymous 5 

 Anticipate a positive effect on local and regional economy by increasing commerce 

opportunities. 

Belton - Anonymous 5 

 Multimodal rail is a much needed addition to the transportation alternatives. All 

options should be explored. 

Belton - Anonymous 5 

 I anticipate a net positive effect on the environment by removing vehicles from the 

roads. 

Canaler Cristina Stay outside city at airport area share long term/short term parking with airport or 

parking garage in major cities 

Canaler Cristina Need extra safe railroad crossings at IH 37. Canaler Cristina Can only be good for CC and South Texas. We have very limited transportation for 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments South TX. I would travel (tourism) more with better transportation and rail service. 

Canaler Cristina I think effect would be minimal outside the city. I've driven IH 35 and hate it. Would 

love to visit my family up North quickly. 

Canaler Cristina What is the effect now with current existing rail? Use some rail or build new rail near 

existing rail? 

Canaler Cristina Cost. Build using best quality materials. Plan for maintenance (not like CC city 

streets). Fuel costs? Fares should be equitable but provide for necessary expenses, maintenance and emergencies. 

Canaler Cristina Medical. My mother has doctors in SA and can't drive alone Canaler Cristina Inter city. Rail from SS of CC to downtown to cut down traffic on SPID. The current 

extension of cross-town expressway is not adequate. 

Canaler Irena Good idea for interstate travel, especially for people that travel alone short distances. 

Have a rail to Houston (under bridge North bound). 

Canaler Irena Pick a central big location accessible big streets or highways not at shoreline. Canaler Irena Tourism within the state would be increased - out of state I don't think so. You can 

advertise the cities you go to. 

Canaler Irena Build a big parking lot, maybe have a shuttle bus, nice depot, have rental car agencies 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments at the depot. 

Canaler Irena Use existing rail, why would it affect water quality habitat for animals. Put in a high 

fence. 

Canaler Irena Have to be able to load suit cases, walkers, wheel chairs for disabled people. Fares 

comparable to bus. Fast buses for long routes from valley to San Antonio to Dallas, others should be slower. Have TVs, playrooms or tables to do paperwork. Use natural gas or green energy. 

Espinosa Edward I could see a day when Valley College kids can go to school in Kinissville be home 

for dinner that evening. 

Espinosa Edward Railroad crossing have been upgraded all along the Brownsville subdivision. Espinosa Edward It would increase on both ends. Espinosa Edward Brownsville/Corpus traffic would decrease so less cars on the road = less envisions 

into atmosphere. 

Espinosa Edward If you run along existing line no problems. Maybe even use the existing live with 

upgrades. 

Espinosa Edward You've got my vote. This is a good alternative form of transportation for our arena. 

The job growth and opportunity will be increased 100%. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Rios Michael There are a lot of conferences/travel to Dallas passenger line good and quicker Rios Michael Economic improvements good but need to protect environment. Rios Michael Like the train be less pollution; better for environment; locals have asthma from 

pollution. 

Rios Michael Against Eagle For Shale project; look at documentary called “Gasland” for problems 

(online in 2009) with gas/pollution, concerns about air quality and water quality. Like if trains had cleaner fuel and hybrid cars on the road. Save money too. Have TxDOT be an advocate for clean fuel; people are slowly dying. A lot of people moving here. 

Volkman Dale How will the daily train schedules compare with local transportation schedules (i.e., 

buses, commuter trains, etc.)? Severe mismatch in schedules will cause a disinterest from the public. 

Volkman Dale Use modern equipment to inspect rails and new technology for train engines. Europe 

uses electric trains which are quieter than diesel. 

Volkman Dale The easier the modes of transportation in and out of an area will increase potential 

businesses and visitors. 

Volkman Dale Passenger trains will not likely reduce traffic conditions unless properly scheduled 

with more localized transportation. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Volkman Dale There would be a minimal increase of negative environmental impacts if the rails run 

parallel to current transportation infrastructures. 

Volkman Dale Passengers should be able to purchase tickets that will take advantage of local 

transportation and provide a schedule from beginning to ending destination. 

Volkman Mary Positive as long as a high level of frequency and accessibility to all parts of the city 

and “the island” are coordinated with all other modes of public transportation. 

Volkman Mary See Germany, France and Spain. Study European train/passenger systems that are 

highly effective and learn from their expensive successes/failures. These are “hot topics” always in Germany. 

Volkman Mary Must be advertised, promoted and presented to the public so that they will become 

more educated and realize the need. 

Volkman Mary Reduces congestion, provides long-term benefit! Safe biking routes to connect to train 

stops, buses/trains ideally. 

Volkman Mary Compliance with all EPA guideline/laws. Hope standards must protect both water 

supply, resources and habitats in every way must blend-green 

Volkman Mary Germany has the best rail system that we have ever used on a daily living and tourist 

basis since the 1960's. Present my lifetime. 

Dallas - Anonymous 1 

 A rail line, with convenient service and a good schedule with interchange to other 

modes of transit, will be a benefit to the economy. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Dallas - Anonymous 1 

 A rail line should take cars off of congested IH-35 corridor. 

Dallas - Anonymous 1 

 To the extent that rail travelers are not auto travelers our air quality should improve. 

Dallas - Anonymous 2 

 How alignment will affect businesses? Increased or decreased traffic for local 

business. 

Dallas - Anonymous 2 

 Relieve congestion on Interstates. Will the rail connect with other public transit in 

cities served? 

Duble Ken The only passenger rail with any hope of success is 220 mph service. Without this as 

the ultimate commitment, this endeavor has no hope of viability. When a passenger takes rail in Texas, he forfeits the use of a personal automobile. The passenger either rents one at the other end which is a cost, or does without. Nobody is going to do this if it doesn't save time. 

Duble Ken True HSR would be comparable in time commitment to air within this corridor for 

urban users due to the time spent getting to and from the airport, the need to get there an hour early, and the lighter restrictions on carry-on baggage that would eliminate the wait at the carousel. If priced competitively with air travel, this would work, particularly for business travelers. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Duble Ken How to make the funding/politics work: Rather than do small incremental changes 

throughout the entire line that will have minimal impact on attracting ridership, the goal should be to open the HSR first between downtown San Antonio and downtown Austin. We could then extend it to Temple, Waco, Dallas, Denton and OKC. All the while, Amtrak should maintain existing service as a feeder. 

Duble Ken Inaugurating true HSR service on these segments will get the public used to the idea 

and make the cities not yet linked jealous, thus building political support incrementally. This is what California is doing. 

Duble Ken Quality first. Think big by thinking small. Ryan Patrick I think that dedicated high-speed rail (speed >150 mph) should be strongly considered 

between D-FW and San Antonio. For DFW to Oklahoma City and San Antonio to McAllen, it is less likely to be cost effective. A concern is lack of public transportation in San Antonio and Austin. Rail service may be more attractive to riders if the proposed rail service were integrated with a car sharing service, e.g. zip car. 

Tamayo Luis None of what I saw showed an existing direct North - South connection through 

Dallas. This should be an alignment for consideration. It should be prioritized higher than alignments through Fort Worth (existing) or the DFW airport. In particular high speed rail should serve Dallas directly. "Higher" speed rail and conventional rail are poor options when compared to driving these distances. High speed rail needs to be seriously considered. 

Fort Worth - Favor more transportation hours 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Anonymous 1 Fort Worth - Anonymous 1 

 Rail may facilitate more frequent tourist trips to San Antonio and Brownsville (South 

Padre island) from Fort Worth (in my case). 

Fort Worth - Anonymous 1 

 Desirable if determined to be more efficient than air or auto travel. 

Fort Worth - Anonymous 1 

 Concerned about auto and air travel impact on air quality. Especially in DFW area. 

Fort Worth - Anonymous 1 

 Would like to see better integration of rail and air transportation. If new high speed 

rail infrastructure is built, this is especially important. Allowing airlines to operate high speed trains would in my opinion eliminate significant financial bias. 

Fort Worth - Anonymous 2 

 Route within Dallas - Fort Worth metroplex needs to have a stop in Tarrant County, 

or specifically, Fort Worth. This is for fair access to this service for residents and businesses that would benefit. 

Fort Worth - Anonymous 2 

 I like the potential of this project concept to reduce depending on automobile and 

reducing VMT and air pollution. I strongly support it. 

Spierer Gema The service should stimulate the area economy. I see no downside. Spierer Gema Will reduce IH-35 corridor passenger traffic somewhat. Spierer Gema No negatives - positives emission reduction 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Spierer Gema DFW route must go to DFW only and let local rail feed high speed and airlines. Spierer Gema Use Dorothy Spur corridor. To liner Arlington TX - DFW - North. Let TRE and 

possible E-W IH-30 pay rail and up provide 2nd E-W feeder. Trail and DART liner O DFW. Challenge: Design one DFW base HSR through terminal. 

Allison Terry Especially the taxpayers! Allison Terry There will be all of the above (safety and neighborhood livability) accompanying this 

project. 

Allison Terry The increased taxes will likely have a detrimental effect on ag tourism and every other 

financial/social endeavor. 

Allison Terry Not much as history reveals, as ridership is always low. Allison Terry We Okies and Texans will require years, if ever, for anyone to convince us to give up 

our trucks and cars. They would only give them up if the government raises vehicular fuel and licensing fees to such a high cost that most cannot afford their trucks anymore (à la Europe and other places with socialist/communist authorities). 

Allison Terry In the meantime, the costs will be huge. So huge that the taxpayer (those with 

businesses, jobs, etc.) will have to pay for ever the increasing costs. This scenario has been repeated time after time wherever these systems have been proposed, partiallybuilt and "completed". They (these systems) are not feasible. Only a few people (politicians, contractors, others?) profit, the rest of us pay and pay and pay. And they 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments (we) pay some more. 

Allison Terry The costs already budgeted are rather excessive. What would the construction cost 

be? Look at the history of existing systems for an answer to that question. It is clear! 

Harlingen - Anonymous 1 

 What speed train will be traveling? What are the delays to traffic? What 

improvements are needed on existing tracks? 

Harlingen - Anonymous 2 

 New merging university in McAllen and Brownsville may have 30 students commute 

between McAllen has international airport to Mexico City. Edinburg has big school. Tourism from North come to South Padre Island or shopping from Mexico. 

Barnes James If existing track is used, should not be any issues on residents that are used to it. Barnes James If crossings are evaluated safety issues will be minimized. Barnes James Should be a boon tourism. One exception - a bus service already goes from airports to 

SPI. A rail to Pt. Isabel is a waste. 

Barnes James Study to minimize a blocking of road crossings is important. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Barnes James Hopefully TSA would not be involved with any to do with this. Which means federal 

money should not be used. There should be no limitations on CHL holders and Gun free zones will invite problems especially this close to the cartels across the border. I would travel to San Antonio to participate in Firearm shooting matches. Easy travel with firearms is required. 

Earley Dorothy Ann I can only imagine positive effects on residents, businesses, and visitors. Earley Dorothy Ann Only minor effects I'm sure? Earley Dorothy Ann All positive Earley Dorothy Ann Only minor effects. Earley Dorothy Ann If passengers are traveling by rail instead of auto (or even bus) I can only see positive 

effects for the environment. 

Earley Dorothy Ann Passenger rail service to Harlingen with free parking. I would benefit personally. I 

would never drive to San Antonio or Dallas again! 

Edge Jim This rail system would be a great advantage for the Valley area in conjunction with 

the plans for commuter rail in the Valley. 

Edge Jim It would provide an alternative for people in our area. The Valley is the fastest 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments growing area in Texas. 

Edge Jim Tourism is important with the influx of Winter Texans from points North. Edge Jim This should be minimal. Trains are more efficient travel. Edge Jim The rail system needs to come to McAllen where it will meet up with Valley 

Commuter Rail. 

Townsend Virginia If there was a lot of money it would be convenient. Townsend Virginia Depends on where it is. Townsend Virginia I'm sure it would be a plus. Townsend Virginia OK I'd be happy with the 70-90 mph Townsend Virginia OK Less gas for cars Townsend Virginia My real concern is money availability. Tedo broke, state broke, us almost broke. We 

must not have another taxing entity. This passenger rail study that has been done here in the Valley has been a complete waste of time and almost $500,000 in money. 

Laredo - Anonymous 1 

 Effects on all the above is on balance, positive. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Laredo - Anonymous 1 

 Safety is enhanced by reduction in highway fatalities. 

Laredo - Anonymous 1 

 Will revolutionize the regions. Massive economic development impact. 

Laredo - Anonymous 1 

 Will ease traffic congestion. 

Laredo - Anonymous 1 

 Reduction in pollution = good for earth, me! 

Laredo - Anonymous 1 

 Reduction in oil dependence and massive positive impact on environment 

Laredo - Anonymous 2 

 If it ain't a bullet train (we still #1 in the world?) don't waste your time and my money. 

In the 70's I took the train from Laredo to Detroit. It took two days to get out of Texas. It stopped like every 25-50 miles at every major ranch. 

Garza Carlos The effects on visitors will be a big improvement on the waiting time and crossing 

times. 

Garza Carlos We believed the effect on noise will be minor comparing the effects and pollution of 

all the visitors. 

Garza Carlos If you develop a big station (train stop) will cause a great effect. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Garza Carlos Will improve the traffic conditions on a good way. Graf Richard I am wholly in favor of a passenger rail line between Mexico, Laredo and San 

Antonio. As a commissioner in T. Rio County it can only help reduce traffic while increasing tourists, providing a stop is placed in Pearsull. I hope that we can get a stop in Pearsull. 

Medina Juan It’s a good idea to have a railroad station in Laredo because persons that like travel by 

train don't have to go to San Antonio and pick the train there. 

Medina Juan I think it is safe to travel by train and more comfortable than travel by bus or auto. Medina Juan I guess the economy will grow because not only people from Laredo use the train but 

people that come from Mexico and other counties. 

Medina Juan I think there is not much effect on the traffic congestion because there's a railroad 

station that is not in use for passengers anymore. 

Medina Juan I think there no hard environmental effects on the natural environment. Medina Juan I hope this project becomes a reality very soon. Oklahoma City - Anonymous 1 

 Businesses would see increase from a new audience which the trains would provide a 

new group of visitor would see what our city has to offer. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 1 

 With the current noise of the city a train service wouldn't add much to that. 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 1 

 A cheap rail service would bring a new audience to new area, while also promoting 

agriculture by providing a view of farm lands. 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 1 

 Inter-city rail would take strain from the business-hour traffic jams and corps. Could 

offer plans to workers to promote the service. 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 1 

 One train running full with 500+ passengers produce a much smaller footprint than 

each of those individual driving their own automobiles. 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 2 

 Train speed over grade crossings 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 2 

 What company will operate trains 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 3 

 Accessibility for all people by ensuring the blind and the low vision population can 

also use the service; project like this truly helps them and making it possible for them to also utilize service at the same time ensure accessibility for all. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 4 

 Optional business class car gives people more options instead of driving. 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 4 

 Service should accommodate bicycles if possible, bicycle racks. 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 4 

 Allow crated pets 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 4 

 More advertising? I always tell people about Amtrak and almost everyone doesn't 

know there is that option or how to book a ticket. 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 4 

 Reduce travel time between OKC - San Antonio to less than 14 hours (it's a 7 hour 

drive). 

Davis Steve To offer clean, efficient travel options. Along the routes the economy will benefit 

from tourism and development. 

Davis Steve Since most rail service would occur in an existing operation rail corridor the effects 

would be minimal. 

Davis Steve Big gains to be made with tourism agriculture would benefit from increased sales at 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments nearby restaurants serving Texas and Oklahoma specialties. 

Davis Steve With increased frequency of passenger service you take more private autos off the 

road. This can already be noticed in the DFW area. 

Davis Steve Again negligible effects on the environment as rail service is efficient and causes 

much less pollution than several hundred cars. 

Davis Steve The need to have valuable transportation options remember during world war II our 

nation’s trains hauled at capacity thousands of troops and private citizens to their destinations. Could this be done by Amtrak today? Doubtful - as too many cities have diminished ability to even service or support passenger rail. When traveling by rail you don't encounter the security issues encountered when flying. Plus, it’s just a better way to meet your fellow passengers, enjoy scenery and get some paperwork done, as well as have some leisure time. 

McKelvey Paul If the problem we are trying to solve is congestion on I‐35, passenger rail is not the 

way to solve it. To be effective, passenger rail has to serve the state's major population centers. A north‐south line from Oklahoma to South Texas misses Houston, the state's largest city. The congestion is most closely related to the number of trucks making a north‐south transit of the state on IH‐ 35. Putting those on the 

railroad is the most cost‐effective way to deal with the problem. While passengers 

and trucks both require timely service, the cost of providing timely service for trucks in lower. The rolling stock already exists and the means of production are in place. Additional cars could readily be built using American labor. 

McKelvey Paul For passenger service, the rolling stock does not exist and would have to be built. 

Typically, this means importing cars from other countries that have production 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments facilities. American labor gets cut out. Texas jobs are involved. 

McKelvey Paul Freight service rolling stock requires far less maintenance than does passenger rolling 

stock, another savings. Timely service is a major consideration. To make the deal attractive, the transit time from South Texas to Oklahoma should be quicker than truck transit time over the same distance. This will require cooperation between rail lines and unions, but nothing they have not already done with the traffic between Los Angeles Long Beach and the Port of New York‐New Jersey. It used to take 2 weeks for a rail car to cross Chicago due to interlining requirements. Today, trains regularly make a 72‐hour coast to coast run. 

McKelvey Paul I like passenger rail, but it has to connect major population centers ‐ Houston, San 

Antonio ‐ first. It has to be faster than driving a car to attract sufficient customers. It 

has to be safe. There should be no crossings at grade anywhere. 

McKelvey Paul Most of the passenger traffic on IH‐35 appears to be intra‐county and intra‐state. 

Campo appears to be developing a solution for that traffic. Freight moved from rail largely because trucks could provide better service. They could because rail lines were not customer‐oriented. 

McKelvey Paul Truckers were. The organization and technologies for rapid rail freight have arrived. 

We should play to those strengths rather than spend money on a passenger rail line for which there is mainly hope, not established traffic. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Lewis Ruth I am so for the high speed passenger rail service. I only wish it was already in service. 

We have needed it for a long time. Just recently I wanted to take a train from Dallas or Fort Worth to Des Moines, Iowa. I would have to go up to Chicago and then back down to Des Moines. This speed passenger service would take a lot of travel off our highways and give elderly people a way to travel when they don't like to drive, including myself. I only hope I live long enough to enjoy a lot of letter so we can get the high speed train rolling. 

Villalon Xavier This should have happened a long time ago! Please make this a reality ASAP. All 

cities involved would prosper. 

Hoelscher Larry Impede use of land. Take ag land out of production. Could impede our access of 

neighboring towns. 

Hoelscher Larry It would present a safety factor at the crossings and also noise level could be an 

unsafe environment. 

Hoelscher Larry It could take land out of production. It would limit access to land. Could change the 

usefulness of prime land as we now know it. 

Hoelscher Larry Getting farm equipment to the other side of the rail could be problematic because of 

the size of equipment and other traffic on the road. 

Hoelscher Larry This could create erosion problems, and change the flow of water in the field. The 

noise could frighten the cattle, horses, deer, etc., as well as birds and other nature. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Hoelscher Larry The rail needs to be placed to the west of IH-35. The unstable blackland to the east of 

IH-35 is not suitable for many safety factors which must be taken into consideration. Many farming and cattle operations will be negatively affected by this rail on the east side of IH-35. 

Thompson Helen This would have a very positive impact on our citizens to access shows and shopping 

in the Dallas, Fort Worth area and businesses shuttle. 

Thompson Helen I see no negative impact. Thompson Helen It would definitely enhance local economy. It would enhance tourism and quality of 

life. 

Thompson Helen I see no negative effect on traffic car-actions except it would enhance accessible to 

Oklahoma City for Dallas Fort Worth. 

Thompson Helen It would have a positive effect in reducing emissions from cars Thompson Helen I see enhanced rail service would have a very positive impact on the local economy. 

Speed rail would be a real plus for those working in Dallas/Fort Worth or Oklahoma City. Tourism would be enhanced making Ardmore a "destination" for shopping and recreation. As a "senior" it would enhance travel for me and my friends to OKC and Fort Worth/Dallas. 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 

 Rail travel should help all these 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 

 Tourism should be helped 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 

 Little or none 

Oklahoma City - Anonymous 

 America, every state should have rail travel! Other countries around the world have it 

today and so should we. Not everyone can afford to fly and many won't like me. I am 81 and have made over 12 trips on the flyer with my wife and many friends, thus we 

in America need more rail travel as it is the safest way to travel. Extend Amtrak, I say.

Wallace Jr HC We don't need high speed rail. All you have to do is upgrade what you now have in 

Amtrak. New equipment and more trains. With 35 improvement why bother spending more money and tearing up the best farm land in Texas. 

Peterson Harold I am writing in response to the high speed rail proposal. I am in favor of the proposal 

as written. I was a resident of Norman, OK from 1998 to 2004. During that time I made several visits to the Dallas/Fort Worth area, both to visit family in Fort Worth and to attend the annual OU/TX game (perhaps referred to as TX/OU in your area). While I only used the Oklahoma Flyer once due to its slow speed and late departures/arrivals relative to the posted schedule, I definitely would have utilized the more efficient option provided by high speed rail had it been available. Should I have the opportunity to move back to the area, I would similarly make use of said option in the future. 

Harlan Jody Public transportation has historically been a prominent issue impacting economic 

opportunities and daily life for one in six Oklahomans who have some type of disability. According to the 2010 U.S. Census, nearly 577,000 or 15.76% of the state's 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments civilian, non-institutionalized population age five and older have disabilities. Thank you for the opportunity to write on behalf of this important constituency in support of expanding rail service between Tulsa/Oklahoma City and Dallas—Fort Worth. As the communications director for the Oklahoma Department for Rehabilitation Services, which annually provides employment and independent living services to more than 92,000 Oklahomans, I am personally aware of barriers to employment created by limited transportation options. 

Harlan Jody The Oklahoma Department of Rehabilitation Services (DRS) conducted a statewide 

survey in 2002 to explore the nature of transportation needs and problems experienced by citizens with disabilities and to learn how transportation issues affect their lives, including their ability to work, live independently at home, access medical and 

disability services and interact with other people. Responses were received from 3,856 individuals representing all 77 Oklahoma counties based. 

Harlan Jody While the data was compiled some time ago, the needs remain because very little has 

happened to significantly change access to public transportation in Oklahoma. Approximately two-thirds (65.5%) of respondents reported there are persons in their households who are dependent on public transportation or rides from relatives and friends because they do not drive or own a car. Almost half (48.1%) of all respondents said they could not drive due to their disabilities. 

McCradic Anthony There was some government money sent to Texas A&M to research and investigate 

High Speed Rail, but I have not seen anything out it. In addition there are a lot of government funds which have been allocated to building or reconstructing roadways, but it didn't include the development of a solid metro system 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

FERGUSON DAVID The presentation and conversation with TXRAIL was very informative. Much 

planning and thought has gone into this study and I was very impressed. The key is arrival and departure times from a location. People who want to be somewhere do not want to waste time waiting for an event to occur. If I have a Medical appointment in SA, I want to leave CC in time to get there and then get back the same day, without a lot of time between events. If I am going from CC to Dallas, I do not want to take the long way around, shortest path, least opportunity for delays. 

FERGUSON DAVID If people are going to the beach for the weekend they want to arrival in CC for dinner 

and not return until after mid-day of their last vacation day. And they would like to have baggage checked no matter which speed train they use. The sooner the better to 

implement the service the better. It will assist us all in giving us the availability to improved shopping, travel options, better health care, education opportunities, career growth. It can allow people to live in distant cities from their work and commute each day, improving their quality of life. Documents and goods could be sent same-day from depot desk to depot desk. This project is a win-win for us all, environmentally, investment, fuel, maintenance cost rail/highways. 

Vornberg Caroline Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Schriever George Please, Get your heads out of the sand and put in Hi Speed Rail. It better for 

everything, with the exception of the air lines and the gas companies. The rest of the world is passing us buy... 

 William It's time Texas takes the lead and develops a viable passenger rail system. Oklahoma 

City, Dallas and other Texas cities will continue to grow at alarming rates. A rapid link between Oklahoma and Texas cities is imperative to meet both growth demands and reduce car traffic on interstate highways. This rail link will also provide consistent travel unfettered by weather or highway traffic. It may also help in the quest to reduce carbon emissions and fuel consumption. 

 Dave Let's have high speed rail. Tam Kinman Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A 

train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Tuch Christopher It's time to think about our environment and future. The passenger rail is a great 

idea!!! 

Aguilar Joseph I would like to see the expansion of the Light Rail System to include stops/connection 

to and from the following: D/FW area to San Antonio, San Antonio to Corpus Christi, Laredo, and the Valley, Houston to Austin, El Paso to Austin, and Houston to Corpus Christi to the Valley. I know that is a big task and probably not feasible but it would 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments curb fuel demand and offer a way for seniors and others who do not drive a safe way to travel. 

Lee James I strongly favor the expansion of rail networks in Texas, and throughout the country. 

If the rails are properly maintained, this form of transportation is the most comfortable and safest there is. It also helps the environment by taking large numbers of cars off the road. 

Prado Homero Jr. As a retired member of the US. Air Force I have visited city overseas and in the US 

with high speed railway systems. They greatly improve travel accommodations for locals and visitors, offer employment, and reduce traffic. I would truly enjoy to see a high speed railway system in South Texas (Laredo). 

Joyas Brenda The Texas-Oklahoma passenger rail service is long overdue. So many people 

commute between these areas, the environmental impact to these areas as far as roads, 

cars, run-off is highly affecting our wildlife and flora. This will reduce the contaminants caused by vehicles, crashes from people driving sleepy, or multitaskingtexting. Please approve this as soon as possible. 

Martin Jennifer Yes, I support the possibility of trains for Texas. We are well overdue to get with the 

environmental program and cut down on carbon emissions. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Meyer Carrie I care about our air quality, reducing our use of oil, and having more transportation 

choices. That's why I support the Texas Department of Transportation considering 

new, higher speed passenger rail service between Oklahoma City and South Texas. I live in Corpus Christi and would love to be able to take a passenger train to San Antonio, Austin, Dallas or even Amarillo! Here are the reasons I support TxDOT creating train service in our state: • Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. • A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. • Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. Thank you. 

Meyer Carrie • South Texas has no passenger rail service. 

• The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers • Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. 

Harrington Galia I am excited about the potential for high speech rail in Texas, particularly due to peak 

oil and the use of unsafe drilling practices for oil that are destroying some communities and our environment. I want to see us moving toward a more sustainable mass transit system than air and roads. 

Long Mary I support high speed rail for Texas. Keener Herbert For the future of Texas it is imperative that we start providing an economical and 

clean way to move large amounts of people around. In the end if we do this we will be 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments putting less strain on our infrastructure while a cleaner environment. 

Kaplan Allison I am in favor of the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail. Matheson Neill I think it is important for Texas to invest in public transportation, especially passenger 

trains. Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. Also, Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Drinan Camille Having local rail transportation is Long Overdue. We are so far behind other countries 

and cities. Having local rail transportation will reduce traffic (that is only going to get worse, since we are the fastest growing city in the nation). It will also reduce pollution, thus improving the air quality for this area. We should be able to provide fast local rail transportation to all vital areas; including; Denton, DFW Airport; Waco; Dallas; Weatherford; Fort Worth. 

Traylor Richard Improved rail can and needs to be done. There is no reason we are not leading other 

nations instead of trailing. 

Sheen Janis It is time that Texas and the United States develop mass rail system. Europe and Asia 

have shown how superior quality rail can transform habits. Mass rail between hubs on the Eastern and Western seaboards of the US prove how promising mass rail can be for the nation. 

Dobbs Tammy Yes I would like to have passenger rail. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Reinhardt Patricia I believe in public transportation and want to see it across the nation and in Texas. We 

need high speed rail. It's about time we got smart and got rail. 

Salazar Jesus F. Transportation by rail is less time on the way to where you’re going and saves 

gasoline, this also helps the envioment. But I believe that transportation by rail will save more lives on our highways, for the 18-wheelers now own the roads. Now we can travel in class and let the driving to others. Who's to know what the future has in store? So for now Lets Rail it. Bring it on!!! 

Nelso Mollie I think a high speed rail through TX would be a great thing. It is high time we join the 

rest of the world and country in utilizing mass transit more efficiently. 

Puente Estevan That is one area we lack in is public transportation. Yes I would like something like 

this to happen. I would like to take a high speed train to San Antonio or Houston for a weekend. I'm sure a lot more people would travel like this. They are proven forms of transportation in the eastern states and also in Europe. We are more than big enough and capable of handling something like this, environmentally friendly people might not like it but in the end it might help reduce the carbon footprint with less cars on the road. It would be great to look into CNG/LCNG locomotives since it truly is in abundance here in Texas, let's use what we have. I really do hope this issue gets pressed more and find a way to do it. Also let's try and make it affordable all around even for low income families. For them it could be a way to catch up and reunite with family in other cities. Just my thoughts and two cents. Thanks!!! 

Soper James We need high speed rail now. It will happen, but act now before we run out of ROW 

building roads. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Brennecke Paula I am concerned this project would revive the "Trans-Texas Corridor". I would not 

want this built by a non-US company. I would want to ensure safe crossings were available to citizens in small communities. 

 Deborah We would be delighted to have alternative transportation around the state. Giving 

people the choice to personal and business travel is essential for improved air quality 

and convenience. 

Fawcett Blair I think that a safe, effective railway system that securely transports our citizens from 

one state or county to another would be a very effective way of traveling. For example, I have family in North Texas and live in South Texas. It would behoove me to have a way of traveling that does not only use car travel. In fact, currently, my options are limited to flight or car vehicle, and I think that a rail that traveled North to South would be great. Particularly if the rail ran through Fort Worth and Houston, two populous areas in Texas. But I affirm that that is my only bias. Otherwise, I think it's a delightful idea if it is executed properly and with elaborate and inclusive safety measures. I put forth the example of Japanese railways systems. One never needs to own a car to travel from Okinawa to Tokyo, for example. Thanks for your consideration, and have a wonderful day. 

Hansen Linda We completely support the proposed Oklahoma/Texas passenger rail project. Rail 

provides the least environmentally damaging method of transportation. It gives travelers the opportunity to support clean air efforts, less cars on the road, and less oil usage while providing a comfortable ride and the ability to arrive at our destination 

relaxed and happy. Rail has gathered increasing support over the last couple of years and we believe the Oklahoma/Texas project will be well received by travelers. Thank 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments you for your time, Linda 

Semrow Carolyn If Texas had passenger train service I and others would visit cities more often for 

shopping and entertainment. I have often wanted to go to a Dallas Maverick's basketball game if there were train service that could get me there in time for the game and return me to Hearne afterward I would love it as well as taking in the culture offered in most large cities ( ballet, opera, art museums, museum of science). When I lived in the Chicago area I was able to enjoy the City because of passenger train service allowed me to have a nice dinner take in a show, shop or a new exhibit at 

the art museum than get on the train and relax not having to worry about traffic, alcohol, or being tired. In cities like Chicago and Cleveland people work in the city and live in the country 20-40 miles away take the train back and forth everyday both these states have plenty of automobiles the train don't reduce car ownership it give people alternative means of travel. Please consider passenger train service in Texas the railroad line are already there and in some places the old depot is a historic building. 

Temple Steve I support and extension of rail service in Texas because the automobile, roads, and 

sprawl are taking over the state especially the IH-35 corridor. I am concerned that our consumer lifestyles that demand even land and resources be supplemented and even replaced by rail services to get around in cities and between cities. This will cut down on sprawl and increase investment opportunities in areas where density will increase around train stations. High speed rail however is not a good option without local train 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments service and better bus transit services to feed its fewer stops. Rail service needs to be combined with more thoughtful controls on development, rather than just letting developers have their way. Our highway corridors are horrible and ugly due to all the adjacent development - driving on the highways makes out state look trashy. Also increased rail services can mitigate road construction because there will be a viable option but only if rail is thorough enough to do so. High speed rail alone will not do this. Please look at successful rail in other countries. 

Norwood Patricia, MD It's time Texas had high speed rail along the I 35 corridor, cutting down travel times 

between these cities, taking cars off the roads and conserving gasoline. 

Torres Alfredo Jr. As a resident of Laredo, TX, I find this railroad study and project to be a great 

opportunity for my area and city. It will help alleviate traffic and be a great asset for tourism. It will also be an effective solution to those who travel and do not have a car. A passenger railway is something I believe Laredo will greatly benefit from, as well as, all residents of Texas. You can count on my support. 

Webb Martha The establishment of expanded passenger rail service in Texas would benefit all 

residents by decreasing air pollution from automobiles. It also increases the opportunity for travel for older citizens like myself who prefer not to drive long distances or in heavy traffic. 

Short Bettye I make the trip from Austin to Dallas at least 5x a year. Think of all my wasted time 

and gasoline. And it’s always under construction, slowing my trip down and making it dangerous. Please increase the frequency of trains between these two cities. 

ERWIN STEVE On a personal level, I would prefer to travel by train. Less problematic that going to 

airports. I can work or relax/read while traveling. Rail is more on-time than planes; 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments weather does not affect the schedule. While rail travel may not make much of an impact, it would reduce the number of cars on the road. That is especially welcome to someone like me who passes through the Austin area and get caught up in heavy commuter traffic. I travel by rail loyally (TRE) in Dallas/Fort Worth. Have traveled from Dallas to College Station via rail; much preferred over driving. 

Owings Terry I am a strong supporter of High Speed Rail in Texas. What follows are some of the 

reasons for this support. There are signs on highways throughout Texas signaling the number of traffic fatalities for the current year. Last year, that number exceeded 4000. Much of those deaths were on the arteries between our major cities. Also, the heavy traffic in the corridors between our cities makes those drives much longer than they would be if people could drive at rated speed. The congestion is a major source of pollution as well. High Speed Rail can have a major positive impact on those issues. 

Owings Terry However, the economic impact would be even greater. That is, high speed rail would 

offer ordinary people to travel quickly between cities and allow for people in Austin and San Antonio, for example, travel to Dallas or Houston for a ball game or, to attend any number of other attractions in those cities. Likewise, residents of Dallas and Houston can have access to the attractions in Austin and San Antonio. This could 

even allow for round trips for events without the need for an overnight stay. Hence, even greater use by people on the go. 

Reid Ruth I support increasing passenger rail service in Texas. This will require fewer cars to 

travel these routes, avoid auto pollution, avoid some road construction, and be good 

for the public. Please approve passenger rail expansion. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Osborne Rusty I would suggest that TxDOT consider San Marcos, TX, as an additional stop for the 

proposed rail project. San Marcos, as a major college town, has a student population 

of +/- 30,000 who would benefit from a planned boarding/disembarkment station. 

Devereaux Victoria I am very much in favor of passenger rail in Texas. I live outside of Austin and would 

love to be able to go into the city via rail. The traffic along IH-35 is getting even worse. It is dangerous and time consuming. It is far better, and cheaper in the long run, to do something now. I am stunned that it was not in the planning 50 years ago. As a child I remember riding the train into Austin from San Marcos. Why not now? The amount of money spent in band-aid fixes to the interstates could be used wisely for mass transit. It is better for every community, the environment, air quality, water quality...I could go on. I hope that passenger rail becomes a reality. 

 GibbonsM.C. We need more mass transit. Fox Marcia Please work on more options for public transportation. I have very fond memories of 

riding the train from Dallas to Waco and Houston to visit relatives. The train was fast and enjoyable. Now it doesn't seem to be as reliable. 

Jimenez Omar There is so much going on on IH-35 with traffic between cities and a way that we can 

get around it if there will be rail that would connect Dallas-S.A. as well as cities south of S.A. Greyhound is just too much and there can be rail between McAllen-Harlingen, it would be benefit everyone in the Valley. I would suggest as well to get started on the rail project from Georgetown to S.A. as well in which would benefit that area as well without the traffic. I think this is a great idea and to have the bullet trains if it will get to Point A to Point B faster. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Tijerina Yolanda We need different types of transit than just the planes with rates increasing. I would 

prefer for consumers have an option for different types of transit available. 

Bletzer Siri I think it is a great idea! It will help our environment by reducing pollution and allow 

car traffic to flow more smoothly and reduce the number of accidents. 

Bordonaro James I support running a rail line (preferably high speed) to the west of the IH-35 interstate 

right of way in those parts of the proposed route that are highly congested to hold down cost. In rural areas the rail line should attempt to run as close as possible to the existing highway to minimize environmental impacts. I would consider using the rail from Wichita to the Corpus Christie area as we've got friends in both Round Rock and Rockport. 

Tickner Robert K. The Cities of Krum and Denton, Denton County have passed resolutions of support 

for the establishment of Rail Passenger Service to Denton County in 2010. This request is to establish a Station Stop on the Amtrak Heartland Flyer service using the BNSF rail line through the City of Krum. This station will provide service to the general area of Denton County and it's cities with a 2010 census population of 662,614 and growing. On August 10, 2010, a Grant Application was filed through TxDOT for a Federal grant to fund a Preliminary Engineering Study and NEPA for this station location. The Application number was HSR2010000400. The North Central Council of Governments, Regional Transportation Council has unanimously approved support for establishment of this new station stop for Denton County, Krum and Denton on January 9, 2008. Amtrak also has issued a letter of support for this proposed station stop in a letter dated August 5, 2010. The BNSF Railway also supports moving forward with the study of the project in a letter dated August 6, 2010. December 1, 2011 a Kansas City-Wichita-Oklahoma City-Fort Worth Corridor 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Passenger Rail Service Development Plan, the Krum/Denton station proposal was considered and referenced for future service expansions. Please keep this station stop in the current study for service to the City of Krum, Denton, and Denton County. Please advise if you need additional information. 

Varnum James I would love to see high speed transit between OKC and Texas. I would make the trip 

down much more frequently if there was a quick and convenient way to travel. I love the heartland flyer, and more an even more efficient train would be extremely beneficial to interstate visits 

Eames Wendy I would love to see fast, efficient rail in a corridor, starting in Houston, swinging 

through San Antonio up to Austin, ending in Dallas. So many people like me have family spread around Texas, esp. in the cities, and like my daughter, a college student, could really use fast, affordable rail to visit family. A rail pass, similar to what is offered in Europe, would encourage foreign visitors to travel economically to visitor sites in these areas. 

Pasztor Gregory Establishment of frequent rail service among the cities of Oklahoma and Texas would 

reduce automobile pollution thereby improving air quality, human health, and 

reducing automobile accident deaths. Any environmental impact the rail right-of-way might pose would be offset many times over by the reduction of use of carbon based fuels resulting from fewer cars on the road. 

Hernandez Jeannette We need a speed rail in this area Schwarz Jann We are excited to hear about the possibility of Rail Service and hope it will be 

available near us. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Cook Elizabeth Texas is in need of high speed rail service. The most-traveled corridors are clogged 

with auto traffic and trucks. Rail would provide an alternative for travelers and improve overall safety. Thank you. 

Almanza Laura Would love to see less cars (especially single passenger) on the road, as well as I 

would like options for travel other than by air or automobile; bus transportation is not an option due to the lack of efficiency. Thank you. 

Dilworth Wolf Texas needs to be on the cutting edge of bringing High speed rail to the US, we could 

have a HS rail corridor from Texas up through the Midwest to Chicago, or... Trains can carry people and automobiles, even some freight, just like in Europe. 

Sizemore Deborah L. I support the proposed Oklahoma-Texas Passenger Rail service. Trains keep more 

cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. I am taking a long-distance Amtrak trip in May 2013. For SURE, I will use passenger rail north to Oklahoma City and down to South Texas, if you build it. 

Please build it! Thank you. 

Creech Carol As a health educator, I can confirm that air pollution and traffic congestion from 

vehicular transport gravely impact the health of north Texas area residents. Additional rail options are desperately needed. Fort Worth and Amtrak have proven how valuable this option is. We need more rail services! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Kendall Paul I travel to Houston and other major cities in Texas regularly. I would definitely prefer 

to take rail as opposed to driving (which I do) or flying (which I refuse to do). High speed rail is definitely a winning proposition for Texas! 

Whitaker Jane As an aging citizen of Texas, I would like to see more passenger rail transportation in 

Texas. I dislike having to drive on crowded highways like IH-35 and would rather travel by train between cities. Good rail transport would keep more cars off the highways. Decent public transportation within cities would also be appreciated. 

Wilson Melissa Rail for passenger transportation is needed from Dallas-Austin-San Antonio to Corpus 

Christi and the Rio Grande Valley. This will improve air quality, human health, and travel safety by decreasing congestion on Interstate 37. It will also increase back and forth travel for business and pleasure, improving the economies of all cities. I fully support the Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail as long as it extends to Corpus Christi and the Valley. 

French Christa I'm thrilled that this is being considered. I would love to have the option to reach San 

Antonio and Corpus Christi by rail. I have family in both cities and travel there frequently. Greyhound is currently not a comfortable or time-friendly option. I would love to be able to read a book to my kids instead of watching the road! 

Craig Elizabeth G. Texas needs rail. Baldwin Carol We really need to invest in rail alternatives to automobile traffic. The number of cars 

on the road today, the amount of gas they use and the pollution they produce in huge and growing. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Thomas Brenda I support the rail strongly. Thank you. Craig Charlie Let's get more rail service in Central and South Texas. Rail can take Texas farther. 

Roads alone cannot serve all our travel needs--now or in the future. As our population grows, our economy demands on more transportation options. And based on the financial success of the nation's highest speed train routes, Amtrak's Acela service, passenger rail service is a better public investment than building more highways. 

Craig Charlie Rail makes sound environmental sense. Trains keep cars off the road and reduce the 

number of short-distance airplane trips. Trains are more efficient, too, since the overall energy consumption per passenger is nearly half that of planes or cars. Trains keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane trips. A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. South Texas has no passenger rail service. The current Amtrak Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Dallas-Fort Worth is ranked best by Amtrak customers. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports and comfortable rail cars turn travel time into work or leisure time. Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. 

Hughes Crystal My comment is in favor of a high speed passenger train between Oklahoma and South 

Texas. I am in favor of rail service because it takes cars off of Texas' highways. I live in Dallas where there are cars everywhere which adds to more pollution. The air quality in Dallas is terrible and it is largely due to all the exhaust fumes from cars and trucks. Roads alone cannot serve all of our travel needs. Trains can help and the energy it takes to operate a train is nearly half that of planes or cars. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Hughes Crystal The current Amtrak service between Fort Worth and Oklahoma City is a favorite of 

Amtrak customers. This needs to be extended to South Texas. Railroad stations are far more convenient than airports. Just visit the DFW airport and you know that it is not a convenient place to get to and it is very congested. All in all it just makes sense to expand rail service in Texas. I hope that you will. 

Rackley Giselle Please seriously consider a new passenger line in Texas. Extension can help 

commuters who use airplane travel almost on a daily basis from Dallas down to San Antonio and the surrounding Hill County. 

LeCody Peter In any future development of passenger rail service, our elected and appointed 

officials must understand that the current rail station facilities and infrastructure now in place at all stations in Texas will be totally inadequate to handle additional train 

frequencies and passenger loads. Local and regional planning organizations must realize that by adding additional intercity passenger rail service, the demands for connectivity at rail stations will increase exponentially. Thought must be given and 

plans drawn for adequate and additional future station platforms, waiting and ticketing areas, infrastructure and connections for bus / local and regional passenger rail / vehicle parking / taxi / car rental / bike and other modes of transportation. Railway stations can also serve as an important means to rejuvenate inner city zones with the development of retail space such as restaurants and shops that offer a variety of services. The more conveniences that are offered to the traveling public, the more the 

public will embrace and use the rail services. 

LeCody Peter Intercity passenger rail service that is planned for Texas must consider the following 

five tenants: 1) Reliability - when a train is scheduled to leave at 10:00am and arrive 

at its destination at 12:30pm, it should achieve an on time performance factor of 85% 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments to be considered a reliable travel option. 2) Frequency and convenience - running fewer than three trains a day between city pairs will not be sufficient to attract a wide segment of the traveling public, especially business travelers. A morning, mid-day and afternoon schedule at minimum is required for any rail line. 3) Trip times - must be at least equal to or better than travel time by automobile. 4) Parking - virtually all rail stations in Texas offer inadequate parking facilities and must be improved to not only offer many who will travel on Intercity passenger rail service the ability to park and ride, but allow for expansion of facilities for car rental agencies and other future rental modes. 5) Comfort and amenities - intercity service in Texas must offer a high degree of service including some level of food service, Wi-Fi internet connections, coach and business class service, clean and comfortable coaches and other options as may be available. 

Maschal William I am 100% in favor of rail transportation and would use it anywhere I could. Please do 

whatever you can to push this potential project to a successful conclusion. It was a tragedy that the high speed rail constitutional amendment failed a number of years ago when everything seemed to be lining up to proceed with that project. How far along Texas would be today if only the amendment had passed. 

Latham Garl Boyd (See attachments for appendices A-E) Latham Garl Boyd ROUTES AND SERVICES 

As specific plans are developed, there will be a need to review all the ways they might 

complement existing/proposed regional and local transit services (such as the DART 

system in Dallas and the future streetcar lines in San Antonio). When final route alignments are selected for the Texas-Oklahoma service, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments consideration must also be given to the "South Central Corridor“ project, as defined by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Two of the corridor's three legs are covered by the TOPRS. lf nothing else, this designation may provide an additional source of capital funding for infrastructure improvements. Whatever service is established through these proposals must offer the frequencies sufficient to make trains a reasonable and convenient transportation option. At the initial stages of implementation, this is more important than any other single aspect of the operation, save safety. The heart of this project, both literally and figuratively, is the Central Section. Detailed comments regarding Dallas/Austin/San Antonio operations follow some general remarks concerning the study‘s two other sections. 

Latham Garl Boyd THE NORTHERN SECTION 

Any substantive improvements along this section depend upon the cooperation of Oklahoma (and, ideally, Kansas). Both states currently seem uninterested in the future (or, even worse, are content to act as if they believe the future will never come). Apparently, Kansas has already given up on the so-called "Northern Flyer Extension" – and Oklahoma has even gone so far as to place their former Frisco right-of-way between Oklahoma City and Sapulpa up for sale, effectively ending any serious discussion of restored passenger service between Oklahoma City and Tulsa. Presuming Oklahoma has a change of heart, the most logical next-step would be to establish a second daily frequency along today's Heartland Flyer route. Ultimately, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments both trains should then be extended north: the morning train out of Fort Worth all the way to Kansas City, Missouri and the evening departure as far as Newton, Kansas (establishing a connection there with east/west Amtrak service operating along the former Santa Fe Railway main line). National network access on both the southern and northern ends of this route segment is an operational imperative. The fact it may not happen any time soon serves as an example of the intrinsic danger when piecing together multi-state compacts. Fundamentally, this is indicative of the federal government's failure to properly support a comprehensive system of intercity passenger train services. 

Latham Garl Boyd THE SOUTHERN SECTION 

Although the line segments between San Antonio, the Gulf coast and the Valley are shown on the Initial Demand Assessment map as possessing a "lower demand," l am absolutely convinced that it is the combination of a San Antonio I Corpus Christi route and a Corpus Christi I Brownsville route which offers the most advantages to Texas and Texans. While a Laredo service might be attractive for international travel (although no Mexican railway passenger connections are currently available) and would give the rapidly growing towns along the corridor an alternative to Interstate 35, trains to Corpus Christi, Harlingen and Brownsville (with connections to McAllen) would not only effectively serve residents of those areas, but business and leisure travelers as well. Laredo may have a population of almost a quarter-million people (making it the tenth largest city in Texas), but its economy is based almost solely upon international trade. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Conversely, Corpus Christi alone is over 20% larger than Laredo and enjoys a well diversified economic base, including a healthy tourism market. ln addition, there are over one million people living within the greater Harlingen/McAllen/Brownsville metropolitan areas. l would encourage serious consideration of the identified line segments‘ viability, while paying special attention to the way these routes would compliment other services operating to and through the San Antonio gateway. 

Latham Garl Boyd THE CENTRAL SECTION 

Operational frequency — From the outset, there should be at least three daily trains, each way, between San Antonio and Dallas (with one being the existing Texas Eagle). 

The possibility of a fourth train, operating on an overnight schedule, should be seriously considered. This is especially important if the overnight train’s arrival can 

be dovetailed with its terminal city's morning commutation service, and if one type of car within the new Starliner fleet is designed with economy sleeping accommodations. Scheduling - With certain route improvements in place, the current Dallas I San Antonio running time of 10:05 for AMTK train 21 and 8:20 for AMTK train 22 can be reduced to Ii thin Q hours in both directions. While not ideal, that change alone will transform public perception of the service and, when combined with additional frequencies and other enhancements, will revitalize intrastate travel by train. On-board service - Ali trains must be equipped with both coach and supplemental fare (reserved seat) accommodations of some sort. Hot food and cold beverages should be sold during the train’s entire journey, with tables and lounge seating available in nonin coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments revenue areas of the stations. The handling of checked baggage, including bicycles, needs to be available on at least one train, each way, daily. East Texas connections - Direct connections (preferably through service) to the east Texas cities of Mineola, Longview, Marshall and Texarkana, as well as Shreveport, Louisiana, need to be planned. The East Texas Corridor Council (with 35 member communities) is in a position to help coordinate this effort. Dallas - it is imperative that both downtown Dallas and downtown Fort Worth are served by every run. Dallas-bound travelers must never be required to change trains in Fort Worth/DART connections, as well as service to the major airfields, should be mentioned in intercity timetables. [N.B. Sadly, there is no single-seat service option currently available on DART's system between Dallas‘ Union Terminal (a.k.a. "Union Station") and either Love Field or DIFW International. See Appendix B] It is worthy of note that, of all the major station sites along the Central Section, Dallas Union Terminal is in the greatest need of attention, despite possessing one of the most architecturally significant and well maintained station buildings en route. [See Appendix C] Routing between Dallas and Fort Worth - The current Trinity Railway Express (T.R.E.) alignment has often been mentioned as a possible pathway for Amtrak trains. This would be logical to meet the needs of Dallas I San Antonio service (no reverse move in or out of Fort Worth's I.T.C., reducing engagement with Tower 55's plant from three times per trip to one, the addition of a possible CentrePort [DIFW international Airport] stop, etc.); however, it is vital that negotiations with the UP allow for other intercity passenger services (such as future trains operating directly from Dallas to Oklahoma via Fort Worth) to use the former Texas and Pacific 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Railway via Arlington. The rerouting of Dallas l San Antonio traffic must not give the UP cause to consider their T&P main a "freight only" corridor! D/FW Airport service - The possibility of a new stop at T.R.E.'s CentrePort Station should be reviewed (see above). Unfortunately, such a stop will still necessitate a motor vehicle (bus, van, etc.) connection of some type for airline passengers - and as it now stands, travelers arriving on T.R.E. trains en route to D/FW Airport terminals are even required to make an additional bus-to-bus transfer during their connecting trip! Successful negotiations with the Airport's Board, the ultimate goal being a simplification of the transfer process, must take place prior to advertising the CentrePort stop as a true intermodal connection. Fort Worth maintenance activities - At present, Amtrak's Mechanical Department and Commissary in Fort Worth services trains 21 and 22 (The Texas Eagle) while its consist dwells at the l.T.C. Included is the fueling of locomotives, replenishing of potable water in cars and the removal of accumulated trash. These routines can easily require 20 minutes (or more) and, in the interest of time, should not take place in conjunction with more time sensitive intrastate movements. Regrettably, this decision may be costly (lf an additional facility is required) and problematic (if that action is deemed responsible for reducing positions within the Fort Worth Mechanical Department). Possible locations for restored/rebuilt coach yards include Dallas (Union) and Texarkana (Union). Servicing on the route‘s south end can continue, as before, at the San Antonio (AMTKISP) maintenance base. Routing between Fort Worth and Temple — To some, this segment presents an obvious choice for rerouting, with trains moving from the current BNSF (nee Santa Fe) main line over to the Union Pacific (nee M-K-T/Katy) main. [This possibility was 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments briefly mentioned under "Stations."] One of the primary benefits of this action would 

be restoration of passenger service to Waco (now sewed by way of McGregor, approximately 19 miles west/southwest). One may also be justified in believing that operation over a single railroad line (UP, either all the way from Dallas to San Antonio, or at least from Dallas to the Lone Star Rail connection point) could aid in our quest for efficient train handling. Theoretical militating factors include additional route miles on UP property (subject to negotiation), abandonment of service to McGregor (a city which has been one of the most avid and vocal passenger train supporters in Texas) and Cleburne (with strong historical ties to the railroad industry and a depot building just over one decade old). As previously stated, rerouting would also require a new station site in Temple (although the former Katy depot building still exists and could be refurbished for 21st century passenger use). Hillsboro and the abandoned M-K-T main to Dallas - The probable stop in Hillsboro (along the UP between Fort Worth and Temple) would presumably be located downtown, just south of the former site of Dana Jct. (nee Dallas Jct.), the point where Katy's Fort Worth and Dallas main lines diverged. The Dallas side (between Hillsboro and Waxahachie) hasn‘t been intact as a through route for over 25 years; however, it was the primary passenger main prior to the mid-1960s. Abandoned in segments, the majority of that right-of-way was held in easement and lost when the infrastructure was removed. lt seems reasonable to project an eventual return of our San Antonio I Dallas trains to this more direct alignment (possibly by constructing new trackage along the median of a rebuilt Interstate 35E), but that remains many years away. The railroad right-of-way still exists for the first few miles south from Waxahachie. I make mention of this issue primarily because the Hillsboro /Waxahachie segment was misidentified on several scoping maps as currently being available for use. [See 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Appendix D] Routing between Granger and Round Rock - South of Temple (Opal), Amtrak trains currently use the former Katy main though Granger to Taylor, then turn onto UP's exMP (nee l-GN) main line, proceeding by way of Hutto, Round Rock and McNeil to Austin. [Amtrak‘s Taylor stop is located at the Missouri Pacific depot.] Once the proposed Lone Star Rail District regional commuter trains are operating, it will be theoretically possible to diverge from Amtrak's present alignment at Granger and join the LSTAR route near Georgetown. Potential benefits include direct service to Georgetown (three times the size of Taylor) and an increased number of miles on trackage predominately dedicated to passenger trains. Unfortunately, in this scenario, Taylor would at least temporarily lose its Amtrak service (although it is mentioned as a future commuter train terminus in Austin’s “Project Connect" plans). Joint operations with LSTAR - A proposal which holds the greatest potential for time savings and operational efficiencies along the study area's Central Section is the concept of sharing UPRR's MP/I-GN corridor with Lone Star Rail between 

Latham Garl Boyd IT CAN BE DONE! 

Domestic passenger train service originally imploded because of political realities and a generally held belief that our "drive-or-fly" approach to passenger transport was both adequate and sustainable, not due to any inherent flaws in railroad technology. 

As soon as we begin making serious investments in our railway system, the results will quickly become self-evident. Will Texas be left with an antiquated roadway system, expensive gasoline, monstrous traffic congestion and no transportation alternatives whatsoever, or will we be intelligent enough to add rail-based solutions to our mix of travel options before the pain becomes unbearable? Five years from now, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments we could still be talking and studying and still have nothing, or we could already be 

enjoying expanded service along established routes and new service on others, while successfully laying the foundation for future improvements — including true H.S.R. Ultimately, no matter how many wonderful, sensible plans are created, nothing substantive will occur until these things become important to the general public. When that happens, no political force will be able to stop it! 

Latham Garl Boyd "Everybody complains about the weather, but nobody does anything about it." 

That famous quip, from the pen of author Charles Dudley Warner, basically sums up the current status of intercity passenger train service throughout Texas. l continue to be fully supportive of any effort leading to increased rail-based 

passenger operations, including all modes - from local transit to long-haul services. I 

regularly use the intercity, regional and commuter trains, as well as light rail and streetcar lines, which now exist. Furthermore, I find my need to drive along Texas roadways proportionally reduced as railway investment increases. It is my sincere hope that railroad technology - for both freight and passengers — is eventually viewed as an integral part of any comprehensive transportation network plan. Regarding the elements of this project, I'm not concerned about any human or natural environmental issues. Overall, the myriad environmental factors within the study area can only be improved through an expanded railroad presence! 

Latham Garl Boyd OUR STARTING POINT 

I'm very pleased to see your commitment to review all possible combinations of 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments service and technology. As passenger train operations are reestablished throughout Texas, it really isn't necessary to begin with true high-speed trains, dedicated infrastructure or multibillion dollar price tags. In fact, for pennies on the dollar when compared to H.S.R., we could improve and expand conventional intercity passenger train service —indicating to a new generation of riders what trains are like and proving to the skeptical that a market truly exists. 

Latham Garl Boyd CALIFORNIA'S EXAMPLE 

That approach definitely worked for Gene Skoropowski. For several years, he was the Director of California‘s Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority, the state agency responsible for intercity passenger train service linking the capital city of Sacramento with the San Francisco Bay Area.  A decade of dramatic increases in patronage followed his commitment to take whatever funds might be made available and spend them upon service improvements. His justification was simple: potential passengers, "when offered reliable, comfortable train service, will ride in droves. We're not talking about "bullet trains" gliding along the Capital Corridor, either. They were — and are — standard locomotive-hauled consists, operating on existing trackage alongside freight trains and running at a top speed of 79 miles-per-hour. Today, California's Capital, San Joaquin and Pacific Surfliner corridors account for over one- sixth of Amtrak‘s total annual ridership. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Latham Garl Boyd “DUAL SERVICE” IS NOT AN OXYMORON 

Based upon California's example (and there are many others), railroading should never be perceived as an "either/or" proposition. The railroad industry will be our 

partners in this endeavor. The operation of modern, efficient freight service over main line routes in no way precludes the addition/expansion of fast, frequent, marketable and successful passenger train service. This approach to growth surely makes a lot of sense here in Texas, where we currently see only one daily round trip between Dallas, Austin and San Antonio (and no direct passenger train service between Dallas and Houston, whatsoever). Many Texans are actively searching for travel alternatives, TODAY! We need to concentrate on the sort of projects which can bear fruit in a relatively short period of time, without the need for additional right-of-way, experimental technologies or break-the-bank budgets. 

Latham Garl Boyd WE HAVEN'T EVEN CRAWLED, YET! 

We must accept reality: the best way to allocate limited capital resources for an expanded passenger train network is through targeted investments in extant properties and the comprehensive redevelopment of conventional services. “Incrementalism" is the key: a methodical approach to cost-effective improvements over a reasonable span of time. There has never been an instance where a region, state, province or nation has established high-speed rail operations before expanding its existing system to capacity! After all, a child will learn to walk before he attempts to run. The political will necessary to actually design, construct, operate and maintain a true high-speed railway network in Texas is not yet evident. Still, for the past 40 years, many wellmeaning people have maintained a "high-speed or nothing" mindset - which, in 40 years time, has essentially left us with just that: practically NOTHING![See Appendix 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments A1] 

Latham Garl Boyd S0, WHAT DO WE DO NOW? 

The rebuilding of the railway passenger industry, one which has been almost totally 

lost to our modern age, involves five major aspects (apart from the obvious need for public support including, but not limited to, funding). People are the single most important part - the professionals who'll be working together as Texas begins to reach its transportation goals. Next comes the railroadowned infrastructure itself, and the relationship developed over time between the various railway companies and the other major players (as previously mentioned). The three remaining things - our routes and services, stations and support facilities, and various pieces of equipment needed to make it properly function - are briefly outlined, below. 

Latham Garl Boyd EQUIPMENT 

Texas cannot depend upon Amtrak to supply the passenger cars and locomotives necessary to cover service expansion, nor can we presume the current styles operating are totally adequate for the job. I propose the establishment of a Texas-owned fleet of cars (“Starliners"), initially using classic designs (such as former Santa Fe Hi-Level equipment) and soon supplemented with new rolling stock patterned after the "California Car" concept (now in service). Simultaneously, research and development can begin on a completely unique type of bi-level coach, especially designed and constructed with Texas’ needs in mind. Modern day equivalents to the dining, lounge and parlor cars of old will play a crucial role in creating the appropriate on-board 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments atmosphere. Amenities unique to rail-based environments add immensely to passenger comfort and help establish a truly marketable product. Diesel—electric locomotives can first be based upon off-the-shelf designs, aesthetically sleek and technologically "green." Future motive power styles include those which could take advantage of eventual main line electrification. 

Latham Garl Boyd STATIONS 

It is oft presumed that existing passenger stations (including support facilities) are adequate to handle future needs. Unfortunately, this is an erroneous assumption. For example, within the study‘s Central Section, every big city station - Dallas’ Union Terminal, Fort Worth‘s lntermodal Transportation Center, Austin's former Missouri Pacific Depot and San Antonio's Southern Pacific Station - will need to have several serious deficiencies addressed, including a lack of track and platform space, inadequate waiting areas and pedestrian controls, insufficient equipment servicing, baggage and express handling and ancillary systems, etc. Furthermore, several other secondary and tertiary stations will either require extensive platform work (e.g. Cleburne and McGregor, along the former Santa Fe [BNSF] main line) or completely new facilities, including depot buildings and platforms (e.g. Hillsboro and Waco, on Union Pacific's ex-“Katy” main), depending upon the way trains are routed between Temple and Fort Worth. Additionally, a UP/Katy routing will also necessitate the relocation of Temple‘s station. Both Fort Worth and San Antonio are blessed with two large-scale downtown station facilities - and both cities will present unique challenges: Fort Worth primarily due to the interlocking plant at Tower 55 and San Antonio because of the major investment 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments VIA (the city's local transit agency) is making at the MP depot site. [See “lssues involving the San Antonio station facility”] 

Brown-Raines Cheryl We have to be friendly to our environment. Our children should not inherit a world 

that is dirty and limited because we disrespected air and water quality issues. Mass transportation is superior and critical to our progress. 

McKenzie John The TX DOT study for Oklahoma City to South TX passenger rail is a great move. I 

believe that this will be a wise investment for TX. Passenger service could provide 

real relief to the painfully congested IH-35. People will use passenger trains if they are available. South TX used to have passenger service up until April 1965. We need passenger service again. 

McKenzie John I also think Brownsville to Houston service should be considered. It is strange how 

the biggest city in TX has only one tri-weekly passenger train. The talk of high speed rail from Houston to Dallas is good but we should also look at conventional passenger train service for starters. I support the study and I hope we see passenger train service in South TX very soon. We need it. 

Campos Alicea In a state as vast as TX, I believe passenger rail would be a great thing. It could only 

help to alleviate pollution by taking cars off the road. It would also have economic impact resulting in jobs as well as access to transportation for those who can't afford cars. I believe this would be a major step forward. 

Claver Karl A. Rail is cleaner, safer, and more efficient than most other forms of transportation. The 

passenger train is also more environmentally friendly. Texas, and the entire nation needs more passenger trains. Instead of constantly rebuilding the highways, and adding more lanes, existing rail lines need to be expanded, and improved so modern 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments passenger trains may wish the public to their destination. 

Claver Karl A. The line between Laredo/Brownsville all the way past Oklahoma into Kansas and 

Missouri is a perfect place to begin. And it must begin right now. 

Serafy Nick I support this project. When considering routes that will be used to attract Mexican 

tourists to Texas, be aware that there are existing rail bridges to Mexico that connect to rail lines to Monterrey in Laredo and Brownsville. There is also a new rail bridge that will open in Brownsville by the end of 2013. 

Timmer Rose I strongly support this project and know that our community of Brownsville will 

benefit greatly from it. 

 Linhda I care about our environmental standards here in Austin and would like for us to 

support new or additional infrastructures for public transportation by offering more alternatives such as passenger rail. 

Thomas Mark L. I would like to enthusiastically encourage the expansion of passenger rail service in 

the Oklahoma City to South Texas corridor. Expansion of rail service would have a number of long-term economic and environmental benefits. Passenger trains are more energy efficient than automobiles or trains. In the long run, trains would be a much more cost efficient option than continued highway expansion. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Thomas Mark L. Development of higher quality, higher speed train service would ultimately alleviate 

highway and airport congestion, thus relieving pressure and improving those modes of transportation as well. Expanded higher speed train service would have less of a 

negative impact on wildlife, and produce less pollution, than continued expansion of highways with increased automobile miles driven. My family and I have used Amtrak service a number of times, on the Heartland Flyer between Norman, OK and Fort Worth, and on the Sunset Limited, between Houston and points beyond to the west (Alpine, TX and Los Angeles). These train journeys have been very good. Amtrak ridership continues to set records. The demand would only increase with improved service frequency and speed. 

 Kevin Why is Houston, the fourth largest city in the nation, being bypassed? Doesn't make 

since to me. 

Gardner Manuela It would be great to have a higher speed passenger rail service in Texas. It would 

mean reduction in emissions which would benefit the environment and wildlife. It would also give people a hopefully more price effective way to travel longer distances. 

Newman Marcy TxDOT has indicated the primary intent of High Speed Passenger Rail Service is to 

connect downtown to downtown on the major cities on the route – OKC, DFW, Austin and San Antonio, but the southern terminus in flux. During the Public Scoping 

meeting in Harlingen, it was suggested that Laredo is the preferred option. 1. The population centers in Lower Rio Grande Valley greater than 430K (2010 census) for Brownsville-Harlingen MSA and greater than 800K (2010 census) for the Hidalgo County MSA. These are more than triple that in the Laredo /Webb County area (250K (2010 census)) and the border crossings for personal vehicles / personal vehicle 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments passengers (21.8M) are far in excess of Laredo (8.8M) as well. This population and border crossing differential warrants additional study and consideration for High Speed Passenger Rail service and connections to the Lower Rio Grande Valley. 

Newman Marcy 2. The Lower Rio Grande Valley has three major airports that could serve as 

hubs / multi-modal transfer centers drawing on a greater population to utilize HSPR service going north – This should be considered when determining the southern terminus. 3. The Lower Rio Grande Valley and South Padre Island in particular, has multiple tourist destinations that could be served by HSPR service and multimodal connections. This should be considered when determining the southern 

terminus of service. 

Bucol Mark S. As one who travels to Texas on business trips four to six times per year I would 

welcome being able to travel between DFW and San Antonio by train. The traffic congestion on the IH-35 corridor is getting worse by the year and to accommodate growth in commerce, the passenger rail system needs to be expanded. 

Bucol Mark S. The private sector can build, operate and maintain the trains, while the public sector 

finances the infrastructure improvements of tracks, signals, and stations. Most of the traveling public will use trains that have top speeds of 90 to 110 mph as long as the trip time is equal or less than travel by automobile and the fare is reasonable. Bullet train systems of 180 to 220 mph are extremely expensive to build and operate. Less extravagant passenger train systems of moderate speeds are more likely to get funded and attract private investment than the very high cost rail systems like those built in Europe and China. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Bucol Mark S. To meet the needs of Texas for the next 20 years a rail passenger route system that 

connects major cities in Texas with adjoining states is necessary as highways become more crowded and air travel becomes less convenient and much more expensive. 

McInturff Alfred High Speed rail between Oklahoma and Texas would be an excellent answer to 

crowed roads and air pollution as well being economically sound. 

Sotelo Jorge I think that it is a good idea that we pursue this type of transportation in Texas. Rogers Keith It is ESSENTIAL that we develop mass transit in Texas and throughout the US. We 

as Texans and Americans cannot continue to consume oil at our current pace. It is folly that we will greatly regret. This is an economic and national security must. We have put off mass transit for far too long at the behest of those that stand to benefit financially from our, potentially catastrophic, dependence on oil. 

MacAlpine Barbara I strongly support higher speed passenger rail service between Oklahoma City and 

South Texas. As a resident of San Antonio, I see the need for a better option than planes or driving to get to Dallas/Fort Worth or Oklahoma City. We in South Texas have no passenger rail service, and we are a large population. 

MacAlpine Barbara Trains would keep more cars off the road and reduce the number of short airplane 

trips. In terms of environmental benefit, this would be huge because a train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger. Thus Texas air 

quality would be improved if vehicle congestion and driving were reduced. 

Graveline Angela We need more high-speed rail. It is a cheaper, faster, energy-efficient, and sustainable 

option for ground transportation. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Addison Aaron Please study the expansion north from Oklahoma City to Wichita and Newton, KS 

which would allow connection to Amtrak points further North. If Texans had an 

opportunity to more quickly and directly take a train to Kansas City or Chicago then I 

think they are far more likely to ride the train from DFW to OKC. 

Addison Aaron Increased passenger traffic on rail improves Air Quality, Traffic Safety, and has a 

positive effect on Human Health. Also, increased passenger rail traffic helps protect 

the environment and reduces carbon emissions by diverting auto traffic. 

Heine Danielle Would absolutely love to have an alternative commute to Oklahoma and Texas from 

Wichita, Kansas. I hope that our city is a part of the discussion of change! 

Wall Matthew An extensive railway system in Texas would reduce energy consumption and traffic, 

as well as provide a safer and cleaner alternative to vehicular travel on highways. Moreover, this option would allow patrons to work on their studies, projects, etc. or even enjoy a time of reflection and relaxation while commuting--a stark contrast to being behind the wheel on congested interstates. Railways are green, convenient, and right for Texas. 

Mitchell Diana I live in Wichita, KS and have used the Heartland Flyer service currently available 

from Oklahoma City to Fort Worth - about 3 times a year. I know that a study is being done to possibly extend service into Wichita, KS. That would be great and I would take advantage of that service, probably doing twice as many, if not more, trips. AND if service were available even further south, like to San Antonio or Austin, I would use it monthly. I hope you will make Wichita, KS part of the Heartland Flyer service and that you are also extend this to include San Antonio or Austin as well. Keep up 

the good work! 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Leisy Aimee I am very much in favor of a high speed passenger train from South Texas through 

Oklahoma and into Wichita, Kansas. I have driven IH-35 many times from Wichita to San Antonio, Texas. I am from Wichita, but lived in San Antonio, Texas from 1999 -2001. I have driven IH-35 many times and continue to do so to visit friends and family in Dallas and in San Antonio. Over the years the traffic, especially in Texas, has increased dramatically. In addition, the constant road construction poses many hazards to drivers. Just last month, I was involved in an accident in Waco Texas because of a piece of wood in the road. The accident, which was not my fault, cost me a great deal of time and money. It would greatly benefit me and many other Kansans, Oklahomans, and Texans if there was an easier, safer, less congested way to travel through the IH-35 corridor. I think that a Kansas-Oklahoma-Texas passenger train is 

the answer to these transportation problems. 

Stewart Susan I would like to be able to use the Austin/OK City to bring my grandchildren from OK 

to visit. The long layover in FT Worth is uncomfortable. While the Fort Worth station is nice, it isn't an easy place for children to wait for four hours. More time options during the day would be nice as well. 

Johnston Liz I would absolutely love to see more passenger rail options available. IH-35 is too 

congested and harrowing to drive on. I would be more likely to take my family on day trips to Dallas from Austin if I did not have to drive on IH-35. Rail is the more environmentally sustainable option. There will never be enough lanes on IH-35 for all 

the congestion. But what I would really love to see is passenger rail to at least Wichita, if not all the way to Minneapolis. My family, like many others, have numerous friends and family all along the IH-35 corridor. Rail would be a wonderful way to stay in touch. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

ANDERSON STEVE Eliminate all of the small town stops if you want this project to succeed. Major cities 

and college towns only. Everyone else needs to travel to one of those stops to board a train. Trains can move faster, make fewer stops, and get out of the way of freight 

trains if they keep moving. What's the possibility of building new passenger-only rail 

in the expressway right-of-ways? Maybe that should be planned going forward when an expressway project is undergoing widening or lane adjustment. 

Carter Bill My comment is that I am strongly in favor of establishing a high-speed rail option 

connecting the major cities of Texas with each other. I would use rail if available for 

my occasional travel from Austin to Dallas, Fort Worth, San Antonio, Houston, Corpus Christi, and the cities of the Rio Grande Valley. Train travel allows work (or rest) in transit, unlike driving, and is only about half as polluting mile for mile as driving or air travel. I have enjoyed using Amtrak for vacation travel to visit family in New Orleans and Washington DC, but would be a more frequent user of rail if it 

provided rapid connections to frequent destinations. 

Carter Bill My question is whether there are any proposals or studies regarding high speed rail 

connecting major Texas cities, and how I could register my support more directly. 

Vinson Paul Everett Houston is left out of the high speed rail proposal. The largest city in Texas and fourth 

largest in the nation should have HSR. 

Miller Kaye It would be very practical, and fill a need to have a train run from Dallas-Fort Worth 

to Oklahoma City, OK to Wichita, KS; then go on to Kansas City and Chicago. AND if we were to use a train like the TGV that goes 300 mph with limited stops, that would be phenomenal!!! Those trains are not only fast, but they are very quiet. A fast train is a must for this idea to capture the attention of the masses, and be practical for 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments weekend vacationers, vacationers in general, as well as, the business needs of these communities. 

Philbin Andrew Why is this project being considered rather than the Dallas Houston project? It 

appears in the best interest of Texas to get its own cities connect first. I love HSR I just think this route should not happen till we get out major cities connected first. 

 Brendon I support bringing passenger rail up the IH-35 corridor from south Texas to Oklahoma 

City, with further extension of the Heartland Flyer line possible through Wichita. I would use this service on trips down to Oklahoma and Texas instead of having to fly. Thank you for the consideration. 

Birlin Michael The line should be IMHO a connector line between the Southwest Chief and Texas 

Eagle. 

Farrier Harold Our Wichita, KS community is very excited about the passenger train rail service to 

Texas and also to Kansas City. It would be such a blessing for travel and traffic. The benefits to the environment and fuel consumption would be wonderful. PLEASE include Wichita in your planning. And EXPEDITE the process, so we can start traveling to Texas cities very soon. 

Merrick Ron Any rail passenger improvements will improve the environment, reduce traffic deaths 

and injuries, and improve mobility. The sooner a passenger rail system connecting major points in Texas can be implemented, the better our quality of life will be. We already have significant rail passenger stations in most of these cities, now we just 

need to add the high-speed track and the trains. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Moore Vardeman The IH-35 highway corridor is beyond capacity, has been for some time, and will 

continue to be when planned improvements and construction is completed. A viable rail alternative is required for both passengers and freight. Upgrading the rail between Dallas/Fort Worth and San Antonio is a cost effective alternative to further highway work during normal times. During times of disruptions to international oil supplies, rail is an essential alternative to highway traffic both freight and passenger. We heavily subsidize highway and air traffic even those subsidies are often hidden from view. Texas needs to look at a program to upgrade rail in this corridor. I recommend taking a look at what Illinois is doing for the corridor between St. Louis and Chicago as a way to run a rail corridor improvement program. Additionally, the passenger rail segment between Dallas and Fort Worth is a disaster and urgently needs revision. 

Bradley Ronn I would love to see the Heartland Flyer come to Wichita, KS. I would travel south on 

it on a regular basis. 

Banyon Evelina 

Villareal 

I am excited for the prospect of developing the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Train system. I am an avid fan of train touring although I had my first trip aboard Amtrak only last December 26 for a holiday with my relatives in Southern California. I have 

always wanted to take the train, something I did not enjoy in my home country, Philippines, growing up. With the prospect of having a train transportation that will bring me to Oklahoma, Dallas/Fort Worth, Austin, San Antonio and down south of Texas easy is something to look forward to. I fervently hope the study that is being done to make this project come true as planned. More power. Salamat nang marami (thank you very much). 

Duncan Sylvia We need more high speed rail all over the country, so let's do this in Texas. It's more 

convenient and comfortable than air or bus travel. It could take cars off the roads and 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments only improve air quality and vehicle congestion. 

Neufeldt Roger This would be a reasonable alternative that would gain traffic between these 

destinations. 

Hodapp Dennis I want to add my support to your interest in improving the rail service. Of course I 

would like the Heartland Express extended to Newton Ks with a stop in Wichita. It seems the equipment is available and the time would allow connections to the Southwest Chief. I'm older and of modest support and lower cost for dependable transportation are important to me. I hope this happens. 

Clark Steve I am completely in favor of passenger rail service between Brownsville, Texas, and 

Oklahoma City, Okla., and the sooner the better I would use it frequently, as would other members of my family, as opposed to driving. 

Krause Joe and Jean Rail service for commuters in Texas would be very beneficial. Abrego Santiago I believe that we need the railroad for more than just freight! I travel from 

Brownsville to San Antonio about twice a month, my friends also do the same. So what can I do to make this a reality? 

 Sumner I am all FOR passenger rail to Brownsville. In a previous TxDOT study, passenger 

rail to Brownsville was in the plan. The PROBLEM is that the Union Pacific Railroad is going to abandon 8 miles of right-of-way [from its Olmito rail yard south to the B&M Bridge crossing] and the Cameron County Regional Mobility Authority wants to replace it with a TOLL Road to the international bridge crossing. They are totally out of sync with what is being talked about on a state and national level relating to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments passenger rail. I have written to them about this concern, and have not received an answer, except to say: "We will have our consultants look into it." This group needs to be contacted and brought into the conversation soon. 

Tirsun Justin As a resident of Brownsville, TX I am excited to see such a grand undertaking being 

started. I wanted to state support for passenger rail to Brownsville both because of the 

economic benefits that the entire line will gain, and because of the existing need for such transportation. I look forward to the EIS for the project and hope that Brownsville is included in the Study. It provides the capacity to access an area of over a million Americans, and potentially the multi-million Matamoros region next door. 

Cook John A. PhD We need to pay attention to environmental studies but most of all we NEED mass 

transit--especially to connect the Rio Grande Valley. With the new multi-campus University of Texas, connecting Edinburg to Brownsville is particularly useful to the economy, but even more importantly to connect the cosmopolitan areas of the heart of TX to Oklahoma will strengthen the economies in every location! 

 Craig I am in favor of developing a passenger rail system for South Texas. We already have 

the basic rail infrastructure. I think a Brownsville to Oklahoma link would be very good for all points along that route for expanded economy. Many folks would take advantage of train travel for the comfort, convenience, and of course nostalgia. 

Cornyn Olivia Please do add rail service to the other options for travel, in the Great State of Texas. Gonzalez Sister Irma I would love to see passenger rail return to the Rio Grande Valley. Hernandez Freddy I think that a passenger railway is a great idea. Not only would it provide a safe and 

efficient mode of transportation, but it would boost the economy of an entire region, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments by creating jobs and make travel for business or pleasure more accessible. 

Meschi J R I think rail service from the Rio Grande Valley would be well received and a popular 

option for traveling north. Additionally, it would reduce traffic on the well traveled arteries, reducing automobile accidents. During high season times on South Padre Island, additional methods of travel, such as rail, would open an entirely new market for tourism to our area. I hope TxDOT will strongly consider approving the railroad travel proposal. 

Brashear Carol My concerns are about the lack of 21st century attention to track infrastructure and the 

politics involved in nation-wide rail service. It will be too expensive until it becomes nationwide. Thank you. 

Winkelblech Alicia The City of Arlington is supportive of the Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study. We 

feel it is in the best interest of the region to run this service as close to the middle of the North Texas region as possible. Stations should not be located on the outskirts of the region. This will maximize accessibility to the service and improve ridership. As the third largest city in the DFW region, it is requested that Arlington be specifically included in discussions regarding potential impacts. 

Monroe Alta If you've traveled lately across Texas it is obvious that there is a huge need NOW for 

additional modes of transportation across the state. The airlines have cut back on flights and not everyone is wanting to fly these days due to all the scrutiny everyone boarding must go through. This is a great idea.... 

Winslow Bonnie For some years, travelers riding the Heartland Flyer between Oklahoma City and Fort 

Worth were able to roll their bicycles directly into a rail car for a ride between OKC 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments and Fort Worth. This opened up many opportunities for commuting between the smaller towns, and for supporting bicycle tourism between and within Texas and Oklahoma. Due to an upgrade in railroad cars, this practice has been discontinued. Bicycle tourism has increased significantly over the past ten years among all ages and backgrounds. Commuting to work by bicycle has increased 64% in the past twenty years. Providing convenient ridership opportunities for the bike commuter and tourist should be given serious consideration as TDOT considers expanding its passenger rail service in Texas. This study and future infrastructure planning must consider not only roll-on access to railroad cars, but also boarding platforms, convenient connectivity to 

other modes of transportation, and safe access routes to and from the railroad station. 

Winslow Bonnie The study should consider increased economic/health/environmental benefits by 

allowing bicycle travel via passenger rails. Although the focus of this study is not bicycling, cycling does provide an additional alternative in transportation to alleviate congestion between Texas communities. Bicycle tourism is a multi-million dollar industry. The Texas passenger rail system with foresight could position itself to benefit from the emerging bike tourism industry. Key to a successful rail/bike relationship is to 1)re-establish roll-on access between Oklahoma City and Fort Worth, and 2)to assure other cross country passenger rail services such as Amtrak’s Sunset Limited will accept bike roll-ons as well. 

Logan Tom Just a comment, I very much believe that this is a great project with positive impact to 

the entire area in many terms. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Meitzner Pete I am the Vice-Mayor of Wichita, KS and I have been the person leading our charge to 

connect the Flyer from Oklahoma City, north, through Wichita, KS and connect with the SW Chief in Newton KS. Also, a day route between Fort Worth to Kansas City as a separate route would be highly desired, we understand the first phase to prove the validity of the expansion of passenger rail service would be the extension of the current service. This could be done at a minimal cost, and we in Wichita, are eager 

and willing to help support this, along with Kansas Department of Transportation. 

This will prove to further secure the IH-35 corridor as a transportation and trade route for our 3 states, and more. Thank you for your consideration and I urge the study to include this expansion. 

Sheets Morrie Please bring the Flyer through Wichita--I travel thru Dallas each week and have been 

stuck there by cancelled flights 3 of the last four times this month alone---I would much rather use your service and sit in a chair other than sleeping on the airport floor for the evening---please give this deep consideration as a option for your continued success 

Fischer Stout Deborah I would like to see an extension of this train through Wichita to KC. Babich David Expanding rail service to Wichita from the established route from San Antonio to 

Oklahoma City is a rational project. That route is important on a national scale that will complete a north/south route to Chicago which then connects to the west coast and the east. Increased passenger rail will also reduce pollution and extend the life of our existing highways. Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas need to collaborate to make this 

happen. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Maynard James D. I would like to see passenger rail extended from the DFW area through OKC to the 

Wichita/Newton area. 

Harzman Brad I strongly support the expansion of the rail line north to Wichita and Kansas City. I'd 

enthusiastically support the line stopping in Emporia, Kansas, where I live. 

Gallegos Therese I strongly support the decision to establish a passenger train route between 

Brownsville and San Antonio. I love traveling by train and use it out East (between DC, NY, and Boston) instead of driving. My mother has taken the train from DC to San Antonio twice. Then I had to drive up to meet her train. It was very inconvenient. If service was established down to the Valley, my family and I would certainly use it. Anyone whose children have left the Valley would welcome a safer, less stressful way for us to visit them and for them to visit us. If people could take the train to and from San Antonio, the highways would be safer and the air would be cleaner. Lives, literally, would be saved. Please, make it happen. 

Burk David I have ridden the Amtrak from Newton, KS to Ft. Madison, IA many times in the past 

and will continue to do so. I believe that we need to support TX to take further steps to advance the current Heartland Flyer from Fort Worth - OK City to Wichita, KS and connect in Newton to the SW Chief. Most developed countries around the world have great train service because it reduces trucks, cars and other vehicles on the roads. This in turn reduces air pollution and accidents, both of which help human health. Making the final connection between Ok. City and Newton will, I believe, considerable increase the customer base for the railroad. 

Hauck Steve Please strongly consider the opportunity to take further steps to advance the route of 

the Heartland Flyer further north, through Wichita to connect with the Southwest 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Chief in Newton, KS. Quality passenger rail is essential for continued economic growth in our region. It is affordable, convenient and generates new jobs. Thank you. 

Burk David I have taken the SW Chief from Newton, KS to Ft. Madison, IA many times over the 

past 40 years. Originally, I was able to catch it from Wichita, KS. I will continue to ride it in the future, due to many factors. Riding the train reduces the number of vehicles on the road, thus increasing the air quality and reducing the number of accidents on the road. Both of these contribute to each of our health. Another plus is that additional passenger train service reduces the wear and tear on our highways, saving the tax payers maintenance cost. I request that Texas takes further steps to advance the current heartland Flyer from OK City north through Wichita to Newton, KS. Thank-you for your consideration. 

Stafford Chad I am writing in support of the proposed study of passenger rail service from 

Dallas/Fort Worth to Oklahoma City and up through Wichita, KS to Newton, KS along the 1-35 corridor. I am president of Wichita based Occidental Management and we are a real estate development firm and actively involved with economic development in the South Central Region of Kansas. This connection would not only open up business travel with, potentially, Amtrak but would also allow for dramatic increases in commerce between Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. These connectors make the IH-35 Corridor a very attractive and affordable business attractor to further the jobs growth of all three States. 

Santo Susie I would like to encourage Texas to take further steps to advance the current Heartland 

Flyer from Fort Worth to OKC north through Wichita and connect in Newton to SW Chief. This would be very important to the region and provide numerous 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments opportunities. Thank you. 

Nichols Lynn I believe the passenger railroad initiative is one of the most important economic 

development projects for all States involved. It will enhance trade, transportation and 

commerce through the IH-35 corridor. Energy costs are increasing, and it provides a way to move large volumes of people safely and timely. Not including, other trade. I would support moving forward on the Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study! 

Page Karyn Supporting infrastructure improvements, especially connecting port or border states 

with inland destinations is imperative for national economic sustainability. More 

emphasis on infrastructure improvement is needed to counter the erosion of the US's capability to remain globally competitive. The success of TX-OK project would aid KS as it pursues an interest in high speed rail development with neighboring states. 

Osten Bub I would like to know what updates would have to be made to the rails and ties in order 

to bring them up to the standard of the train speed of an Oklahoma-Texas passenger train. And what that speed might be. 

Guerrero Luis Hello, I live close to our railroad in the Rio Grande Valley. Our area has had 

tremendous growth throughout this decade, and us down here in the valley, feel unappreciated by the decisions people in our capital do. I believe that it is time to bring Railroad passenger rails to the Valley. We are a region with a population of over 1 million people. We are far from rural now. Let’s put a stop to this discrimination and lets help the Valley and our region prosper economically and social. BRING 

RAILROAD SERVICE here with a boarding station in McAllen, TX, the biggest city in our county. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Rodriguez Constanza Hello, I believe that our region is ready for a passenger rail service. As Mexico's 

economy grows and we are affected since we are in the border it is obvious why a rail service is needed for this area. McAllen is a city on the growth that will soon play a 

key play in the economy. Our city is growing and we need you guys to help us give back. Many people travel from McAllen to San Antonio, or McAllen to Brownsville daily. We need a service that is fast and efficient. The rail service is the future for 

transportation. Please bring it here. 

Lopez Oscar The railway transportation from the Valley to San Antonio and Houston would be 

beneficial to many Valley residents as the roadways are always filled with travelers coming and going to both cities. It is safer and most fuel efficient to have public transportation that is reliable and economic. 

Lopez Oscar If it is affordable would save the country vast quantities of oil. Many of the travelers 

generally drive large trucks and SUV's to those destinations. It would also make railway travel accessible to other parts of the country. 

Durham Roger Many people in the Dallas/Fort Worth area would like to travel by train to Austin, San 

Antonio, or Oklahoma City, but cannot do so because the present train times are not convenient. More frequent service would take many automobiles off the overcrowded and dangerous IH-35, 

Durham Roger Improving traffic flow and air quality, and reducing gasoline consumption. Durham Roger If at all possible, the service should be extended north to Wichita, KS. Diaz Fred E This is a great idea and the most sensible yet. I believe it should be a commuter rail 

with a refreshment car. The highways to Laredo and Brownsville are packed with 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments truck traffic. Laredo processes over 20,000 trucks a day. The need is very much there as we senior citizens cannot drive to those cities because the trucks are very intimidating. There are many accidents on the highway caused by driver exhaustion. This can be collaborated with DPS records. During Hurricanes it makes sense to provide passenger train for evacuations. Schools could use the rails to carry large student populations to San Antonio. Young people could do field trips to valuable displays and enhance their education. 

Diaz Fred E Trains are much more economical than cars. The rail will provide many jobs. The old 

adage that if you build a bridge...they will come is very true. Train service should be restored immediately. We don't need sleeper cars. We need reliable, dependable and timely service at an affordable rate, 

Salinas Orlando It is of utmost importance that any rail plans for a north-south Texas rail corridor 

include the Rio Grande Valley and the Texas-Mexico border. 

Lopez Maureen This is long overdue! The stream of traffic to and from the RGV of Texas and San 

Antonio is constant and heavy. Why should all of these tens of thousands of cars pollute the state when people could use mass transit which would be less expensive both for the environment and, hopefully, the pocketbooks of travelers? 

Lopez Maureen It would be especially help if it could be a high-speed train like those they have in 

Europe and Japan and if the train(s) could stop in the upper RGV (Edinburg/McAllen/Pharr) before heading north. I would suggest only those two stops then an express journey to (hopefully) downtown S.A. and parts north. I can imagine with a new university being formed between UTPA and UT-Brownsville that (if local travel is allowed) you would also have a number of students traveling between the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments two stops (i.e. upper and lower valley) as well as students traveling to S.A. for a wide variety of reasons including family, shopping, and wider educational opportunities. There would be SO many benefits that would ensue that it is impossible to list them all with the limited space provided. The RGV is growing so fast and the current choices of travel north so limited that it is almost inconceivable that the number of people who would use a passenger train wouldn't be in the thousands, daily (especially weekends), if the service is provided and space available. The key would be keeping costs reasonable/low. 

Moore Mary Ann I am in favor of passenger rail service to the Rio Grande Valley. The sooner the 

better. 

 Rogelio I believe that bringing rail service to the valley would be economically beneficial to 

the area and to the cities in McAllen, Brownsville and Harlingen, TX. It would also create jobs in the area. 

Zavala Dagoberto Just a comment of support and long overdue rail service to south Texas. Very 

supportive with fuel cost, traffic congestion, and baby boomers reaching retirement age. Travel on rail systems in the eastern US and loved it..... 

Stearns James Rail service into the RGV would be not only be prudent but would also move freight 

plus people. It's a long needed service and I believe it help immensely. 

Rubenstein Shirley I would like to see high speed rail in Texas to link all of the major cities. Kennedy Suzanne I support the new, high speed passenger rail service between Oklahoma and South 

Texas. IH-35 has been a boondoggle for a long time now and I would welcome an 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments alternative mode of transportation that is economically friendly. 

Young Hilary I travel several times a year between Austin and Oklahoma City. I support efficient, 

effective high speed rail between Austin and Oklahoma City if it could run on schedule and be an efficient alternative to driving (6 hours) or flying (around 4 hours). 

It is attractive to have an alternate travel method that would not add to traffic or 

pollution, would lessen the congestion on IH-35 and on airplanes, and would consume 

less energy per passenger than do cars and airplanes. 

Williams Twila I hope that Texas will put in a rail system linking the valley to OKC. I moved to the 

Valley from OKC and have family and friends there. Please move forward with this rail system. I look forward to riding from the Valley to OKC via rail. 

Ware Marie-Pierre We need this train, please:). Weinberg Eric The trains should come from Texas all the way through Kansas including stopping in 

Wichita Kansas. The trains should go from Texas all the way north. One of the stops should be in Wichita Kansas so that people can load or unload the train from here. Also all train companies should maintain their lines as well. The passenger train would be a great way to get people places across America. 

DeGraaf Rep. Pete I would like to echo my support of expanding passenger rail along the 1-35 corridor. I 

serve as the Chairman of the General Government Budget committee in the Kansas House of Representatives and also serve on the House Appropriations committee. I and other representatives in the Kansas legislature are strongly supportive of developing a passenger rail partnership between Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. We see great value in extending the Heartland Flyer north from Oklahoma City into 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Wichita Kansas. 

DeGraaf Rep. Pete Expanding north to Newton Kansas would allow for productive business travel along 

the IH-35 corridor all the way down to Houston Texas and also allow the Heartland 

Flyer to connect with the already existing passenger rail Southwest Chief going east to west into Missouri and Colorado. The use of trains for vacation and business travel is becoming more popular and ability to connect existing rail service seems to make good business sense. More and more businesses understand that rail travel is restful and far more productive than traveling by car or air. It is my hope that Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas will work together in developing an interconnected passenger rail system that includes bring the Heartland Flyer north through Guthrie, Ponca City, Mulvane, Wichita, Newton, and into Kansas City. 

Riggs Christopher I strongly urge all government agencies involved with this project to move ahead as 

quickly as possible on connecting a southern rail route with Kansas. It is long overdue. The economies of all the states involved will benefit, I believe. Thank you! 

Racunas Tom I am writing to support and encourage Texas to take further steps to expand the 

current Heartland Flyer from Fort Worth to Oklahoma City into and through Wichita, Kansas and connect to the Southwest Chief in Newton, Kansas. I see this as a good economic and social/cultural benefit to Kansas citizens. Thank you for your consideration. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Miller Janet I favor the rail link passing through Wichita. Improvements in the infrastructure will 

be a further incentive to companies considering setting up offices here. Jobs will be created, economic development will follow, and a vibrant city will evolve. Establishing the rail link will itself create employment. Wichita has much to offer tourists especially in the arts. They will flourish with visitors from other cities given easy access to come for the symphony, opera, ballet, music theatre, Botanica, a world 

class zoo and more..............they all need people to come and see, stay in hotels, eat in our restaurants. Wichita could become a destination city with a good rail link. 

Schmidt Linda I feel it is important for passenger rail service to have a connection in Wichita, KS. 

This would be an important travel alternative to connect Wichita to areas along the IH-35 corridor. 

Simons Luke I support increased rail transportation between OKC and south TX. I have to travel to 

Austin area often and would love opportunity to take rail from OKC - even better if rail service eventually includes Tulsa. Thanks! 

Fields Rebecca I am in support for TX to take further steps to advance the current Heartland Flyer 

from Fort Worth - Ok City north through Wichita and connect in Newton to the SW Chief. 

Cubbage Diana I hope you will support and create ample support to extend the railway system up 

from Texas to Wichita and then into Kansas City. The need of many and the advantage for both business and pleasure makes this a good project to energize. 

Kelly Jonna Please continue the railway through Wichita and to Newton, Kansas. I firmly believe 

this will benefit both Texas and Kansas in many ways. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Stair Evan Studies such as what is being proposed here are long drawn out affairs that can take a 

decade, if not more to complete. The studies are typically outdated when released. This is a needless waste of tax-dollars. This study should be expedited in order to address increasing need for regional mass transportation. Federal funding availability is typically well below Regional and Express High Speed Rail needs. The project should consider, and assume, less than $10 billion a year will be available nationally for passenger rail development. Specifically, incremental and specific project design should be considered over a universal high level overview. A series of small projects should be proposed that can be taken from Service Development Plan (SDP) to Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to Preliminary Design (PD) to Final Design (FD) within months, not years. 

Stair Evan The state of Missouri has been successful in garnering a great deal of federal funding 

using this method through a Public-Private Partnership with the Union Pacific Railroad. Individual projects include adding a bridge over the Osage River, adding a passing siding at California Missouri, and grade crossing upgrades. Special attention should be given to upgrading existing rail infrastructure in the San Antonio - Houston - Dallas-Fort Worth triangle. This includes a new segment between Dallas/Fort Worth through Bryan/College Station Texas to Houston being considered by a private entity for High-Speed Rail development. It is a mistake to omit this leg from project scope. Some TxDOT involvement will likely be required for this new private project. The leg between Fort Worth and Oklahoma City should be targeted as a multi-frequency 90-mph Conventional speed operation per FRA definition. It should be primed for later Regional High-Speed Rail development. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Dickerson David I strongly support improving passenger rail service in the Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas 

corridor. This is a welcome initiative and I thank TxDOT for leading. I hope the Oklahoma Department of Transportation will actively support the effort rather than undermining it as they have done every non-highway transportation development proposal in the past. 

Dickerson David To make this effort truly effective and to have the greatest impact, frequency of 

service must be a primary focus. Frequency must be high enough to offer meaningful alternative to driving and offer flexibility in departure and arrival times along the route. I think a minimum of 4 round trips per day between Oklahoma City and the DFW Metroplex will be required to establish service. Hopefully this will begin to reduce the number of automobiles on the Interstate 35 corridor but is certainly not a "silver bullet" solution. Viable passenger rail service will reduce traffic congestion, improve safety by reducing the traffic volume, and improve air quality in densely populated areas by reducing automobile emissions. 

Dickerson David I hope to see "enhanced" conventional passenger rail improvements as the initial 

focus rather than focusing on high speed rail exclusively. If the KS/OK/TX corridor can be upgraded to 110 mph service like the Chicago-St Louis line, that will have greater immediate impact than studying HSR for decades. This higher speed conventional service could be fully operational in less than five years if sufficient emphasis and investment by the states involved can be garnered. HSR should be the eventual goal, but in order to change the auto-centric culture we should provide rail alternatives as soon as possible. Has this approach been considered? Thank you and I look forward to future developments. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Harvey Hank Expand passenger trains in Texas and through the Midwest. It makes sense any way 

you look at it. 

Wagner Scott As a City Councilman from Kansas City I would like TxDOT to consider moving 

further north along this route to include Kansas and the City of Wichita in this study. Filling the gap that exists creates an opportunity to connect the IH-35 from corridor from the Dallas/Fort Worth area all the way to Kansas City, Missouri. We encourage TxDOT, OkDOT and KDOT to work on filling that gap and will ask MoDOT how it can assist you. 

Lynn Krystine My experience is solely with the southern section and parts of the southern end of the 

central section. I am a private citizen who has a strong interest in rail. Should European style high speed rail on a dedicated right of way be selected, the optimal path would seem to be the abandoned Southern Pacific right of way (San AntonioAlice-Falfurrias-Edinburg-McAllen) as this could be a dedicated right of way directly to McAllen unencumbered by sharing with freight railroads. The right of way does have a lot of visual evidence remaining and could be rebuilt, but large segments are missing or difficult to spot from Highway 281, which parallels the right of way. This right of way passes through dry brush and scrub which is subject to frequent red flag fire weather warnings. Systems must be planned to ensure hot box caused fires will be detected quickly and also that the grade be well groomed. Fire hazard control will be a constant challenge with this section. If the above route were to be built conventionally, it would not be competitive with other modes in time, but it would win on quality and comfort. 

Lynn Krystine Plus, it would provide access to the Eagle Ford shale, which might help carry the 

costs of the project. However, oil is a very dirty business with a poor environmental 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments record. Furthermore, construction north of the Edinburg, TX area has all but obliterated the right of way for many miles (a problem that will be made worse in the future as the construction never stops in the Valley and never slows down). Action must be taken as soon as possible to secure any right of way that serves McAllen. McAllen is indeed linked to Harlingen by the Rio Valley Switch Co. However, rail service to McAllen might be best served by rebuilding abandoned Missouri Pacific trackage from Raymondville to Edinburg via Hargill and Faysville due to the poor state of the RSVC track at the present time. I can ride my bicycle and keep up with their train. Most of that right of way still exists. 

Lynn Krystine I am not too inclined to believe a model without checked baggage could work, but I 

am willing to give it a chance if it's cost and time competitive with air travel (which I absolutely avoid) as the European high speed rail network is presently. If Amtrak long 

distance style service were implemented, I would choose it over competing modes of transportation. Austin, Houston and Corpus Christi would be my primary destinations with trips at least once a month. However, with TX-OK rail access to Amtrak in San Antonio, I would be inclined to choose rail over any other mode for long distance travel. Presently, my preferred mode of long distance travel is by bus. If such service were selected, I would recommend routing over UP trackage to Harlingen with stations in Harlingen and Brownsville. 

Lynn Krystine It would not be difficult to rebuild Southern Pacific trackage from Harlingen to 

Edinburg via Santa Rosa, Edcouch; Elsa as the right of way is in good shape having only recently been abandoned. I make this recommendation on the basis of the current poor condition of the Rio Valley Switching Company's mainline and the extremely high number of at grade crossings with high traffic along said mainline. I feel a strong railroad safety campaign will be necessary to reduce the increased fatalities that may 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments occur due to careless drivers. I also recommend not routing along Commerce St. in Harlingen due to the high number of at grade crossings and the prolonged delays the average freight train causes. 

Lynn Krystine Would the people down here pay for it? I believe so. Travel by train has an air of 

efficiency and luxury that is so very much lacking. Even the lowest proposed level of service exceeds the level of service offered by current options. Also, I'd rather meet a CBP or TSA on a train than at Falfurrias or in a screener line. My experience with train travel is that it turns people from pigs to gentry. Therefore, in consideration of all the difficulties this project faces, I fully support it. 

van Asselt Mr Jan I register my comment in favor of Rail Service up the corridor IH-35. We need more 

rail service in general, our highways are too crowded with large truck traffic and too many vehicles in general. My wish would be that McPherson would be more connected by railroad; when I came to McPherson in 1955 from The Netherlands, we arrived at a local train station. Our train came from New York via Chicago. All connections for passenger train service have disappeared. We do have long, long freight trains passing through but none stop here. Any freight that comes into McPherson, which is considerable, comes from a regional service; there is no passenger service connected with it. 

 Daniel I believe this would be a great idea to have down here in the valley! It would make it 

easier to travel from here to cities in the northern part of the state, as well as it would be very cost affective for the people using the train system. They wouldn't have to worry about having to fuel up their cars, which would more than likely cost them more money, then having to take a train to i.e. San Antonio, Austin, or Dallas. With more money in their wallets and bank accounts the probability of them spending more 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments goes up, hence it would help many local businesses increase their revenue, as we as help the Texas economy grow even more. This is why I believe that a passenger rail system will help the valley tremendously, and in effect the rest of the state would benefit as well. 

Fry Scott I support this project with a southern terminus in Brownsville, Texas. Klemp Richard The Kansas Star Casino in Mulvane, Kansas supports efforts by Texas to advance 

passenger rail service into Oklahoma in order to extend service into the Wichita area and eventually meeting in Newton, Kansas to connect the Heartland Flyer with the Southwest Chief. 

Mitchell Jimmie I take the train a couple times a year up to OK, and I would like to see that this rail 

system be continued and expanded. I would also like to see the passenger rail service 

extended on a daily basis between Austin and Houston, I have family in New Orleans and cannot take the train there because of the schedule set forth by Amtrak. Not only is this a personal issue for me, I also realize that using the train, rather than a private vehicle is much better for the environment. The amount of money that goes into paying for the upkeep of the roads would be lessened if less cars are on it, and mass transportation will improve air quality for all living creatures. Due to the fact that we have experienced 270 months of higher than normal temperatures something needs to be done to lessen our unhealthy impact on our environment, and if better service were offered to the public more people would utilize mass transportation. It will have to be done eventually, so why not now? 

Ybarra Lupe I would like to voice my comment of my wholehearted approval of the Amtrak 

passenger service being extended to accommodate the Rio Grande Valley traffic. For 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments years we have had to travel to San Antonio in order to access the Amtrak service for my elderly parents. For years we have had to go the day before, rent a hotel, and see them off in the early morning hours when the train would leave. My father, who will be 88 this year, has a middle ear condition that prevents him from flying anymore. This condition causes excruciating pain whenever there is a change in air pressure in the airplane, such as ascending or, especially, descending. We have a lot of family in California still, and this would greatly benefit them and other elderly people who can no longer fly. Given the booming growth of the Valley, I feel it is high time that more services become available to our area, in order to meet the growing needs of this population. Yes, I reiterate my approval that the Amtrak service be extended to Brownsville, TX, in order to facilitate the connection of the Rio Grande Valley to San Antonio and beyond. Thank you for considering Amtrak expansion to our area. 

Atkinson Eve Thank you for notifying our agency, the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation 

Department, regarding the study on the service level of rail passenger service. We are concerned that the current passenger rail service is not meeting the needs of travelers to Oklahoma, but also service to areas between Oklahoma City and Texas The mission of Oklahoma Tourism is to make tourism an even bigger, more vital part of our economy. We concentrate on three areas to energize our state's tourism industry: Enhancing Oklahoma's image to accurately reflect who we are through advertizing and addressing travel perceptions. We must rely on each other to advance tourism in Oklahoma. Our role is to continue building partnerships and assisting tourism leaders. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Atkinson Eve Government funding of passenger rail infrastructure: What are the benefits from 

government supported passenger rail service for leisure travel? Can it be justified as an efficient way to move vacationers? Is mass transportation for leisure trips a “greater good” for society? There are studies showing highway systems are subsidized. Who benefits the most from highway construction and maintenance? Many highway projects are built using an 80/20 match, with USDOT programs. Is it sustainable to continue increasing the width of highways beyond a certain number of lanes? Is safety culture (benefiting travelers and employees) a benefit from government management of rail transit? According to Progressive Railroading (August 2012), AMTRAK is working to expand a program to improve the railroad's safety culture; improving workforce development initiatives; and investing in more systems and technology that help reduce energy consumption and operating expenses. Private corporations and government are interested in safety when worker insurance rates increase. Perhaps auto insurance companies would invest in passenger rail if traffic accidents are reduced. 

Atkinson Eve Effects on the natural environment (such and water quality and habitat) 

1) Routes avoiding Oklahoma State Parks, Federally funded municipal parks and wildlife refuges should be prioritized 2) Ways to accommodate wildlife / livestock crossing areas should be catalogued for future consideration. 3) Ways to accommodate wetlands should be catalogued, and rated. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Atkinson Eve Known needs for funding and an implementation schedule: Improve the reliability of 

the OKC-Fort Worth route. Make it an efficient mode of travel, rather than a traveling amusement ride. (Ad hoc comments) Passenger and freight trains travel at different speeds on the same corridor. Use Positive Train Control. Support the AMTRAK strategic plan: The funding stability that's given managers the opportunity to think big-picture will help them execute the plan. No longer worried about whether the organization will exist by the next fiscal year, Amtrak managers now can focus on carrying out longer-term strategies. Plus, Boardman (the current director) has been on the job for almost four years and had plenty of time to observe the railroad's operations and gain a firm understanding of what's working and what's not. (Progressive Railroading, August 2012) Modernize the cars: “The train is relatively old. If you expect to use electronic devices, make sure to arrive early so you can snag 

a seat with an outlet.” (www.redriverhistorian.com /readingtherails.html) 

Atkinson Eve We are addressing the need to revitalize the Oklahoma State Parks System because it 

is an integral part of tourism and one of the most significant recreational components for our citizens. It takes a significant amount of our attention as we continue to protect and preserve their ecosystems. I work with the Recreational Trails Program and Land and Water Conservation Fund, both Federal Programs to develop trails and parks across the State of Oklahoma in Oklahoma’s State Parks and in municipalities in Oklahoma. I participate in the grant application evaluation process and American Disabilities Act compliance. I travel to around 20 projects per year. I have a BA in Geography from the University of Colorado, 1979. I have 20 years of experience with the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department. I also worked with the City of Boulder Planning Department, and the Denver Regional Council of Governments, in the Transportation Planning Department. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Atkinson Eve Priorities to address regarding the purpose of the study: Improving the service. The 

service exists between Oklahoma City and Fort Worth, but there needs to be action on 

improving the service. If there have not been studies reporting the level of customer satisfaction, then there should be. Ad hoc comments say it needs to be more reliable. An investigation on the Amtrak site states it meets the time schedule 80% of the time. The site says the delays are due to repairs of the track, rather than the presence of other trains (AMTRAK website), March 2013. More frequency: Viewing Trip Advisor, a travel website, a Texas visitor points out a short trip to Oklahoma City requires a two night stay, as the train arrives late and leaves too early the next day for any meaningful sightseeing. Therefore, a weekend trip from Fort Worth to Oklahoma City would begin Friday afternoon and end Sunday afternoon. In contrast, using a passenger car requires only a one-night stay and the cost for gasoline and parking are distributed among the number of passengers, whereas the cost of train tickets per passenger outweigh the gas and parking costs. 

Atkinson Eve Consider the destinations of the travelers. Sources of factual information may already 

exist regarding the number and frequency of trips through origin-destination studies in Geography or Marketing departments of major Oklahoma and Texas Universities. Oklahoma Destinations: Are there more car trips, therefore more demand, for rail services to Oklahoma rather than from Oklahoma? The population of the metro area of Dallas-Fort Worth is larger than the population of the state of Oklahoma population. Furthermore, there are points of origination beyond the Dallas-Fort Worth metro area such as Houston, Austin, and San Antonio. Consider also, Oklahoma has two cities for main destinations, the Oklahoma metro and Tulsa metro. Currently, only Oklahoma City has a rail service. If there is no service further than Oklahoma City, a potential market of passengers will be ignored. There will probably be rail 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments service between Oklahoma City and Tulsa in the next 20 years, so we encourage development of a more reliable, frequent and faster service to Oklahoma City. Demand for Oklahoma destinations are sports events (collegiate football, basketball (professional and collegiate), outdoor sports activities such as bass fishing and OHV recreation, family visits/duties, scholarly activities at the University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma State University and Casino experiences. The participants in outdoor vehicle sports, horse racing or rodeo events probably would not generate rail passengers due to the amount of equipment needed to transport, but the fans would be likely to use the service. The main generators of commerce in downtown Oklahoma City are within 4 to 5 blocks of each other. Among the most notable are the Federal Court, various Federal offices , the Devon building, the Devon Arena Events Center, Sand Ridge, USGS Geologic Library, the Oklahoma City Art Museum, Oklahoma City Memorial, the Skirvin Hilton Hotel, the Oklahoma City Metro Library (holds research reference materials) and the Oklahoma County Court house, and Oklahoma County Jail. These are within walking distance of the train station. The State Capital and many State Departments, the Oklahoma History Museum (for history research) and University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and Children’s Hospital are one mile from the train station, but they are not within walking distance due to a hill and exposure to car traffic. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Atkinson Eve Origination points south of San Antonio: Which area generates more trips to 

Oklahoma: Corpus Christi, Brownsville/ McAllen or Laredo? Is there a demand for leisure trips from south Texas to Oklahoma? Research regarding the number of trips and the destination of travelers needs to be shown. Perhaps the data or studies can be found at Texas A&M University from the Texas Transportation Institute. Texas Destinations: Regarding Oklahomans as a source of passengers, Oklahomans travel to Texas for cultural activities (music, sports, shopping, and heritage tourism opportunities, but also for corporate regional meetings and governmental offices because it is a regional center. What is the most frequent destination of Texas-bound travelers? Is the airport (DFW), Dallas or Fort Worth the most frequent destination from the Oklahoma metro? There is a demand for passenger service to the airport because DFW is the hub for the Oklahoma and Texas area. The closest hubs for nonstop service other than Will Rogers are DFW, Houston and St. Louis. Other airports (Wichita, Tulsa, Dallas-Love, Amarillo, Kansas City) feed into these three (DFW, Houston, St. Louis) for the most part. However, the cost per passenger can again outweigh family use of a passenger car to the airport. For example flights from DFW or Dallas Love airport are generally cheaper than flights from Oklahoma City, but if the train costs more than the plane there is no incentive. 

Atkinson Eve The trip purpose: How important is it to provide service to quasi leisure trip demand? 

Quasi leisure can be described as a mixed purpose trip, such as medical visits, shopping trips for specialties, “leisure business” such as conventions, music or dance competitions, pageants, Latin dancing, ball room dancing, chapter meetings in clubs and organizations such as professional organizations but can serve purposes of tourism. The payoffs for taking the train would be less driving stress (according to the Texas Transportation Institute, The Dallas Fort Worth area is the 6th worst of the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments nation: http://www.weather.com/activities/driving/slideshow/traffic.html?page=10&scheme=image-horiz-plain.css) Leisure business would require adding stops along the route to 

a major destination, before the metro area is reached. Fostering a mixed purpose trip, (meeting passenger needs) would require more stops to include useful destinations, combining utilitarian destinations with attractions. It is possible to serve the work ethic of “work then play” or “work hard, play hard” by providing opportunities to arrive at a multi- purpose destination. An intermediate hub with light rail links allowing dispersal of trips may work. Altering the schedule to allow all the passengers along the way from Oklahoma City to a point in Texas to transfer to high speed rail throughout the Texas metropolis, could allow passengers to arrive by 10 am in the morning to the airport, to the Dallas Convention Center or to downtown Fort Worth. This would be the ideal scenario. A study or report on frequent destinations from other studies could support this scenario. 

Atkinson Eve Livability: Neighborhood and regional traffic conditions How can the service be 

improved to make the communities where the passenger train has stations more livable? There are two components of availability which support livability, frequency of service and a well designed site. If the train does not arrive during waking hours (6 am to midnight), it is as if the service does not exist. Also contributing to low use rates is poor traffic circulation. If the station site is congested, the parking is complicated, the site is unkempt, complex or requires walking through bus or traffic drop off lanes, it is inaccessible. Furthermore, a train station could be a point of avoidance, similar to a city bus station, if it is designed poorly and not well maintained. If the area appears unsafe people will not want to use the service until gasoline prices or costly parking or lack of parking cause a hardship. Off site design is 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments not a part of this study, but on site design and improved connections needs to be. 

Atkinson Eve Site and Design criteria: Stations and stops need to be accessible to people with 

physical disabilities. Also include close temporary parking for seniors and families. Cross walks should be well marked, with crossing signal lights imbedded in the adjacent streets. There should be some outlying parking, a well-lit and open layout to facilitate the change of travel mode. Include accessible service counters, ramps instead of stairs, signs to answer basic questions like arrival and departure times, 

fares, restroom locations, well marked waiting areas and benches or sitting platforms. Photos of the inside of the rail cars and carry-on stowage should be posted to prepare people to load. Compensate for a lack of an attendant at the OKC AMTRAK station by providing auto kiosks, or a limited choice computer to make information available 24/7. Provide other self service facilities to increase travelers’ knowledge and 

comfort. Coordinate plans with other mass transit modes: Include improvements supporting various modes of travel. Design the site to accommodate buses, shuttle and taxi pick up, drop off lanes separated from passenger car drop off and loading, and temporary parking. Relocating tracks is not as flexible as providing shuttles to improve connectivity. A flexible, demand driven destination shuttle to take people to 

areas more than 4 blocks away but less than 2 miles away could work. People would wait in “bench rows” according to their destination, and which ever fills up first, leaves first. A transit logistics manager could shift the routes to allow an infrequent destination to “piggy back” on a more frequent one. Studies have been done showing the most efficient way to load an airplane, so a transportation logistics expert could develop a flexible route system. 

Atkinson Eve Measures to share investment costs in the Mass transit system: Investigate ways the 

mass transit industry and corporations could contribute to costs of passenger rail 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments infrastructure and benefit from passenger rail service. Auto and health insurance companies could benefit from reduced traffic congestion on highways which generate accidents. Mass transit can reduce the number of accidents and injuries. Again, research existing studies performed at Universities and Institutions to present the facts. Oil and gas companies can be given incentives to invest in mass transit linking their investment to tradeoffs for carbon emissions. It reduces the carbon footprint of vehicle use, which decreases carbon emissions. 

Hemberger Rev. Robert I write in support of pursuing with serious study the possibility of passenger rail 

service from TX to Kansas City. This is an idea whose time may be here. Especially interesting would be some train service that would connect us in Wichita with the KC and St. Louis markets. Air travel to those places is terribly inconvenient. 

Gibbs Mark Please give strong consideration to rail corridor improvements that would overlap 

with existing or future commuter rail projects. For instance, the Association of Central Oklahoma Governments (ACOG) has just started an eighteen-month commuter rail study that includes the Oklahoma City to Norman BNSF corridor. Capacity improvements, including double tracking, will likely be needed along this route and these may become more viable if they will also enhance the potential and capacity for intercity rail between Oklahoma and Texas. The ACOG study is on a very similar timeline to this study and I hope there will be effective coordination between these two important passenger rail studies. Please also give consideration to utilizing existing commuter and light rail links. For instance, if Oklahoma City to Fort Worth trains were routed via Denton, interchange with the DCTA A Train and then the DART Green Line would represent a useful short to medium term rail link to Dallas. This would help address the problem of how to effectively serve both Dallas and Fort 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Worth from Oklahoma City. 

Babich Paul I'd like to see the route extended through Wichita and on to Newton to connect with 

east-west routes there in Newton. Wichita is a major city in the area, but it lacks rail service. It is logical to extend the route up to Wichita and on to Newton. 

Soto Josh Make it happen. More jobs, safe alternative, better for environment. What's not to 

love? 

Watson Murray It has been brought to my attention that the State of Texas received a grant of Federal 

Funds for study of the need of a passenger rail service from Oklahoma City to Laredo, which would hopefully include space for freight. It’s critical to those of us here in the Central Texas area that Waco is included as one of the stops for the passenger service and to send off freight. This area will grow and take advantage of the opportunity and economic developments that lie ahead. In addition to the main rail, I think it is equally important that you make connects at both ends for those who have a need to go beyond Oklahoma City or Laredo. 

Meadors Matthew I am writing on behalf of the Greater Waco Chamber of Commerce Board of 

Directors and the organization’s approximately 1,600 member firms to express the Chamber’s strong support for expanded rail service in Texas, and to ask the Texas Department of Transportation to ensure that Waco is connected to future rail systems. 

Meadors Matthew Waco enjoys a diversified and growing economy, excellent natural resources, 

outstanding educational institutions, world-class business and industrial parks, unified and visionary leadership, and much more. The community’s physical location along the dynamic IH-35 corridor, situated halfway between Austin and Dallas, is enviable. 

However, our great location has also created a number of challenges. The IH-35 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments corridor is heavily congested, impeding the efficient movement of people and goods, and creating safety and environmental quality concerns. Further, we have limited access to air service. 

Meadors Matthew Access to a modern, efficient rail system will help address these challenges and 

position Waco and central Texas for continued economic growth into the future. We wish you and your team much success with the current study. Please feel free to contact me if I may be of assistance. 

Chase Goodman 

Felicia The mission of the Cooper Foundation is to make Waco a better place to live. A 

critical part of making Waco a better place is ensuring our community’s long-term economic success. For this reason, the Cooper Foundation strongly supports passenger rail service in Waco.

Chase Goodman 

Felicia Both passenger and freight rail service are crucially important to maintaining the 

state’s enviable national and global competitive position. Locally, Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to our community’s and our region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. Thank you for your consideration. 

Stanton Tom As Executive Director of the Bernard and Audre Rapoport Foundation in Waco, 

Texas, I wanted to express support for passenger rail service, as it is critically important to maintaining the state’s national and global competitive position. 

Stanton Tom Waco’s connectivity to any and all rail state rail systems is vital to our community 

and the region’s continued economic growth and development, particularly given the competitiveness of limited air service, interstate congestion, not to mention 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments environmental and safety concerns. 

Stanton Tom We ask and urge that Waco is assured connection to any future rail system. Thank you 

for your insight in development of this much needed method of state transportation. 

Christensen Tate I am writing to you today in regards to an extremely important matter and wish to 

express my support for passenger rail service. We support passenger rail service and want to encourage TxDOT to ensure Waco is connected to any future rail system. Passenger and freight rail service is critically important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position. Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s and region’s continued economic 

growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, 

environmental concerns and safety concerns. 

Still Willard What a wonderful opportunity for Texas to have the $5.6 million Federal grant to help 

fund a rail study. With a good route and stops near populated areas, a well-designed rail system would complement our excellent highway system by relieving congestion and adding a great deal of safety as Texans travel. 

Still Willard You would expect me to support Waco being a stop for the rail system and I do so. 

Waco is a growing Texas community and is home to Baylor University, TSTC, and McLennan Community College along with many productive and successful industries. It is the major community between Dallas and Austin and because of that we have limited access to ample air service. Passenger rail could make a real difference for this community by reducing travel on IH-35 to reach a more major 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments airport. 

Still Willard Thanks for your work to begin this important study. Whatever we in Waco may do to 

assist you would be our privilege. We are bullish on an effective rail system for Texas and we would be grateful for your support of a stop in Waco. 

Bailey Bill (AW) I am very interested in the study that is to take place, and I want to express my strong 

support for the route to come through Waco. Waco is a major city on the IH-35 corridor and must be included in the route. Thank you for your kind consideration. 

Lopez Carlos I support the passenger Rail Service from Oklahoma City to South Texas. Pieri Parker F. It has come to my attention that the state of Texas will be conducting a study on a 

proposed passenger rail line from Oklahoma to South Texas. Passenger (and freight) rail service is very important to keeping the state of Texas competitive in the regional, national, and international economy. It is vital that Waco be connected to these rail systems so that the greater Waco community can continue its economic growth, especially given the communities limited access to air service, congested roads, and 

safety and environmental concerns. If you have any questions or would like additional input, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your time and consideration to this matter. 

Recks James I understand that the Great State of Texas recently received a grant to study expanded 

rail service in Texas. As a business person in Waco who travels IH-35, I appreciate the amount of planning and effort TxDOT expends to try to keep pace with the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments growing Texas population and its transportation needs. Let me say THANK YOU for all the great work you are doing. May I also say that the residents of Waco are 100% in favor of your possible rail service expansion and we in Waco want and need to be a stop on any proposed line! Keep Waco in mind and keep up the good work! 

Lucchese Kathryn I understand that there will be some discussion this week of a passenger rail line 

between Oklahoma and Houston, and I just wanted to beg for a stop (again) in College Station and a connection with the Bush Intercontinental Airport. We spend endless hours driving back and forth between these two locations, and when returning from abroad from conferences and research it is exhausting to have to drive another two hours to get home. 

Lucchese Kathryn The air pollution in Houston and frequent traffic snarls argue for a train line, as well. I 

also believe we would visit Dallas/Fort Worth more often if we did not have drive so long to do so. Reading, doing work or grading papers are all things that can be done when not driving -- not to mention napping safely! Thank you for your consideration of the public interest and increased productivity! 

Bailey Wes As a Waco businessman and President of the Waco Business League, I wanted to 

touch base with you and voice my support of the proposed passenger rail service from Oklahoma City to South Texas. This would be great for Texas AND great for Waco. It is my firm belief that Waco’s connectivity to such a rail system is extremely important to our community’s continued economic growth and vibrancy – not to mention the economic growth of the whole region. 

Bailey Wes When you consider the very limited air service we have in Waco – coupled with a 

terribly congested IH-35 roadway, this new passenger rail system will be similar to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments manna from heaven. Please know that Wacoans want it! And we need it! Thank you very much. 

Sheldon Rick Please accept this letter as an absolute YES for rail in the future! TxDOT’s rail 

passenger and freight service is absolutely vital to the future of Texas and, especially, 

Waco and the Central Texas area because of our lack of air service, along with congested roads, environmental concerns and safety concerns. Good luck and let us know if there is anything we can do to help. 

Gutierrez Christopher 

H. 

I am a very active player in Regional Economic Development. Please note my support for passenger rail service. Not only is passenger and freight rail service critically important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position, it is an essential reliever to the overburdened TxDOT highway system. 

Gutierrez Christopher 

H. 

Connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the Waco community, as well as the region’s continued economic growth. Given our limited air service, 

congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns, it is absolutely essential that the passenger rail service from Oklahoma to South Texas become a reality and most importantly that there specifically be a Waco Junction serving as a hub to our region. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. 

Kultgen Peter I would urge that Waco along with the other major cities in Central Texas be included 

in whatever configuration of passenger rail the TxDOT study is considering. As our 

community continues to grow and with its central location it is very important that we have access to any such passenger route. The further benefit of helping to relieve congestion on IH-35 should help save the State of Texas money in the long run. Thank you for your consideration. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Hookham Bernadette As an architect in the local community, I support passenger rail service and freight 

rail service as it is critically important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position as well as supports a more sustainable means of transportation for people and movement of construction materials thru the region. 

Hookham Bernadette Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s 

and region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. Thank you for your assistance. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions. 

Solano Alfred We support passenger rail service; passenger and freight rail service is critically 

important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position. 

Solano Alfred Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s 

and region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. Thank you for the work that you do to further the continued economic growth and success of our State. 

LeRow Stefan As a resident of Waco, TX and frequent traveler on IH-35, I strongly support the 

proposed passenger rail system from Oklahoma City to Laredo, TX. If economically feasible, I would love Waco to be included in the routing of this service. Please let me know how I can support your efforts in making this idea a reality. 

Lee Jeff I am one of the executives for Members Choice Credit Union in Waco, TX. Our 

organization enjoys a membership base of 30,000+ members and I would like to communicate to you that Waco would be able to support passenger rail service. I agree with my peers that passenger and freight rail service is critically important to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position. 

Lee Jeff Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s 

and region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. Waco is in a nice position with easy access to major cities and must be included in the vision. As we examine our future growth for Waco, this must be in the plan. In advance, thank you for your review of my correspondence to you and your team. 

Hulse Monte Please accept this letter as support for rail service, both passenger and freight, for 

Waco and Central Texas. It is vital for our economic growth. We have limited air service and our roads are congested hampered by environmental and safety concerns. Thank you for your support in making sure Waco is connected to any rail lines proposed through our area. 

Hicks David The purpose of this letter is to express my strong support of passenger and freight rail 

service which is critically important to maintaining our state’s enviable national and global competitive position. As you consider plans for this service, please keep in mind that Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to this region’s economic vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. Waco is the center of Texas as more Texans can be found within a 100 mile radius of Waco than from any other spot in Texas. I wish you well in this project and would be happy to participate in any way I can. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Brown S. Boyce We support passenger rail service; passenger and freight rail service is critically 

important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position. Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s and region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns 

Martinez Antonio RESOLUTION NUMBER 2013-027, M A Resolution of the City Commission of the 

City of Brownsville Endorsing the Establishment of Passenger Rail Service to Brownsville, Texas. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Brownsville has determined that establishment of passenger rail service between San Antonio, Texas and Brownsville, Texas is needed to afford travel choices for residents of the lower Rio Grande Valley; and WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that proposed passenger rail service between Brownsville and San Antonio, Texas will promote both the general welfare and economic development of the Brownsville urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the City Commission recognizes that having passenger rail service 

available to evacuate elderly persons and persons with disabilities in the event of an approaching hurricane would serve the public interest and constitute an efficient and 

safe means of accommodating the special needs of these individuals; and WHEREAS, that the residents of South Texas will benefit from the economic development opportunities that will accrue due to increased tourism to this area by virtue of Passenger Rail services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City 

Commission of the City of Brownsville endorses the establishment of needed passenger rail service to and from Brownsville, Texas. FURTHERMORE, City of Brownsville staff will forward this resolution to TxDOT staff as evidence of the need for such rail improvements, in connection with the on-going Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study. Approved this 16TH day of April 2013. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Esrock Brett Providence Healthcare Network, Waco’ s leading employer, supports passenger rail 

service and passenger and freight rail service which is critically important to 

maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position. Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to our community’s and region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. 

Brown Herb I read in the recent issue of NARP News that TxDOT "is beginning a process to 

evaluate improvements necessary for enhanced passenger train service between Oklahoma City and South Texas." I'm wondering why a connection between 

Oklahoma City and Kansas City doesn't come first? I'm sure the rails are already in 

place between the two cities and would be a seeming easy change to make. In essence, the trip between Austin or San Antonio to Kansa City would help relieve the congested IH-35 corridor. Let me know what obstacles exist to prohibit the extension of rail service between Oklahoma City and Kansa City. I, for one, would definitely use the service from Austin to Kansas City many times each year. 

Burk David I plan on continuing to take the train for several reasons. People riding trains are not 

driving, this reduces traffic accidents and increases the quality of our air. Both of these increase the longevity of people’s lives. A further consideration is that train travel reduces wear and tear on our highways which reduces the taxpayers’ money to help maintain highways. 

Burk David I have taken the Chief to Ft. Madison, IA over the past 40 years, originally I was able 

to take it from Wichita, KS, but now I catch it from Newton, KS. I would like to support Texas in taking further steps to advance the current Heartland Flyer form OK 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments city north through Wichita to Newton, KS. Thank-you for your consideration. 

Villarreal Carlos Thank you for the opportunity to make a few comments regarding the TexasOklahoma Passenger Rail Study. In discussing high-speed passenger rail that part of 

the intent of the federal legislation regarding high-speed passenger rail was to include Laredo in a rail corridor. You may ask why Laredo should be included in a high-speed passenger rail project. The City of Laredo is the home of the largest, most-efficient inland port of entry on the U.S./Mexico border. In 2012, Laredo, Webb County, 

handled 3,592,428 cross border truck crossings. That averages out to about 9,842 truck crosses a day. The port also handled in excess of 8,785,366 passenger vehicle crossings. The total number of vehicles that crossed through the bridge system in 2012 is in excess of 12 million. There are more than 830 trade handling and transportation-related businesses in Laredo, Webb County, Texas. Current trade numbers show that Laredo is ranked sixth of all ports in the United States and the only one to have double-digit growth out of all of the district. The significance of the flow of commerce through Laredo is not just a local or state issue. It has been recognized at the highest levels of the federal government as being in the national interest. The need to keep up with the ever-increasing flow of international trade through Laredo, Webb County, clearly outpaces the funding that is available. 

Villarreal Carlos I see high-speed passenger rail as offering many benefits to Laredo, Webb County, 

the state of Texas and the nation. High-speed passenger rail is a way to further promote and stimulate trade and tourism with Mexico. It offers a safe, convenient and comfortable way to travel. 

Villarreal Carlos High-speed passenger rail delivers a new mobility which would relieve congestion on 

the state highway system and reduce state highway maintenance costs. Rail also offers 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments a reduced impact on the environment thereby preserving air quality. 

Villarreal Carlos High-speed passenger rail would be an economic boon to south Texas by creating 

hundreds, if not thousands, of jobs building rail infrastructure and maintaining and possibly manufacturing rail cars. In closing, it is obvious to those of us in Laredo, a city which has no air service to San Antonio or Austin, that high-speed passenger rail would fill this transportation gap. It would also complement the flow of traffic between Nuevo Laredo and Monterrey. Finally, it would enhance and benefit international trade and commerce between the United States, Mexico and points south. 

Villarreal Carlos The City of Laredo supports a high-speed passenger rail project in south Texas and is 

geographically the best suited to handle future passenger rail service. Thank you. 

Delagarza MR. E. The idea of making a -- a railroad -- passenger railroad to San Antonio and up north, 

it's just been I've been thinking of that for many years. I'm surprised that it hasn't been done any earlier simply because I think it is one of the best things to happen to Laredo. As we know and if we study history in the 1880s, railroad came to Laredo, and, if it hadn't been for the railroad train, Zapata would have been Laredo. Or the way Zapata was growing -- it was Miere or Guerrero, actually, here in Laredo across the street -- that was the community that was larger than Laredo in the 1800s. But when the railroad came to Laredo, Laredo grew -- outgrew everybody along the border; and since Laredo was on the north side of the river, it became a prominent railroad city. And, of course, the history shows that the railroad had a lot to do with the growth of Laredo, the growth of the area; and when we study the history, we know that Laredo was very influential and very much into the agriculture during World War I and World War II. A lot of agriculture -- and mostly vegetables, onions, cantaloupes, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments and watermelons, and all of that -- were taken out of Laredo by the train routes and taken to the war. The Laredo area, all of this area, was very good in providing services and produce for the community -- or for the state and for the nation. So the railroad was a very important aspect of it. Now -- and that was commercial loads, freight, whatever. 

DELAGARZA MR. E. Now, the passenger train can do wonders for this city considering what we have out 

there on the roads. The traffic, the -- the -- the huge amount of traffic (trucks and the 18-wheelers) and what have you of which Texas -- it used to take two-and-a-half hours, now it takes us longer to get to San Antonio. For example, a train will help with -- I think with passengers will help to do a lot of things. My concern was -- and I asked a while ago was, if -- if the railroad (or the government) was going was, if -- if the railroad (or the government) was going to take land away from the land owners around the track, which was, I think, the reason that the -- the Highway, which was the 69 or 59 project from -- that Perry had -- was talking about a lot failed because he was taking too much land and not being paid the proper amount. According to this -- to this gentleman (Mark) I think he said that that might not happen because there's a different -- a different thing happening here with the train; and I hope it doesn't happen. I mean, I don't have land out there, but I would really dislike you coming and taking my land for peanuts when I've paid so much for it. So -- so I think that -- that this is good if it happens. 

DELAGARZA MR. E. We do really need that highway, having the rail -- the rail -- the train. We do really 

need a passenger train. I think the Laredo-San Antonio route is the most straightest route that there is in any place in -- in -- in the south and USA and Texas that has to the northern states from Mexico. Put it here and it just go -- just carrying people to -- across all the way over there would make it beautiful. The other thing that I have is 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments the area to be concerned for placing -- of course, I'm getting ahead of myself. Where are you going to -- where the station is going to be. And I'm getting ahead of myself. But I think I -- I've gone through a bunch of cities, numerous cities in Mexico, for example, where they have railroad trains and they have the city here and the station is outside the city. (Indicating.) So you have to travel a lot, but there's plenty of space out there anyways, and I think it would probably be the most appropriate way to do it, just outside the city limits where you have lots of space to do parking and whatever you need to do, and that can build itself up to a better -- better place to work from. So, you know, there's a whole bunch of the -- but those are things that were coming to my mind as I came here, as they was -- as I was listening to -- to Mark and the young lady here today talking about it and just to let -- let you know, let Phil -- he -- know about it. Or, you know, there might be other things that I will write down anyway. Well, I have more stuff but I -- I'm just going to stop right there. 

GARCIA MR. J. Yeah. About four years ago I started an interest in -- in getting a train to south Texas. 

I wrote quite a few letters to Senator Henry Cuellar and, also, to Amtrak querying why we didn't have any trains in south Texas when all of the rest of the state had trains that left from San Antonio to El Paso to Dallas to Houston, but nothing was coming out to south Texas. So I think this is an important part of our transportation system that is critically needed, especially with the growth in population of Laredo and some of the other southern border -- cities along the border. 

GARCIA MR. J. One of my suggestions at that time was to run a train, believe it or not, from San 

Antonio to Laredo to Corpus, back up to San Antonio, but on my -- my thinking on this was to have a monorail system. And my reasoning for that was because of the huge amount of traffic that is now in Cotulla, and most of the south Texas area, with this oil boom that's just recently happened here, this would avoid any kind of delays, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments any kind of possible, I want to say -- what was it? -- like a -- any -- any kind of hazard or any kind of trash or anything that may occur on these -- during the transit between here and San Antonio. 

GARCIA MR. J. So by providing a monorail system it would lift the train up and over all of this that's 

happening already in this area. It'll relieve the area hunters that are hunting, that have huge ranch and investments in hunting here, also, 

GARCIA MR. J. The problem that we have with the immigration problem that's -- we have 

encountered on a daily basis with immigrants jumping on trains trying to find a way to use the trains as a vehicle to go north without proper clearance of immigration. I think all of this was important things that I used as bullet points when I was addressing this issue two or three years ago. Nothing has changed in these issues except that it's been compounded and that also with this are drug concerns, the 

movement of drugs between Laredo and north Texas or, I should say, deep south Texas to north Texas. 

GARCIA MR. J. So while I embrace the fact that the train is coming to south Texas again, those are 

some of my concerns and issues that I'd like to address at this time. 

Schmerler Jessica See attachments (map and email) Schmerler Jessica Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) has reviewed preliminary information 

received at the first Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Agency Scoping Meeting on March 27, 2013 and offers the following information for consideration when moving forward with this project and preparing a service-level Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Schmerler Jessica Project Description 

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) commenced in winter 2013 and is expected to be completed by fall 2014. It will document the costs, benefits, and impacts of rail service alternatives compared to a no-build alternative in a servicelevel EIS. The EIS will provide a high-level review of rail needs and potential service options in the corridor (called a service-level EIS). The study could conclude with a decision to advance individual projects for more detailed study or a decision against making further investments in passenger rail in the corridor. Before any identified project could be constructed, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) 

would need to complete additional environmental review and identify funding. Hi -

speed passenger rail has been under consideration in Texas since the late 1980s. In the 1990s, a private consortium was awarded a franchise to design, build, and operate high-speed rail in the state. Although demand appeared to support the development of high-speed rail, lack of funding and other obstacles prevented the project from moving forward. Since then, other proposals for high-speed passenger rail in Texas have been submitted to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), with each proposal showing revenues that exceed operating expenses but requiring some amount of funding to build. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Schmerler Jessica In 2000, FRA designated the South Central corridor, including the area from San 

Antonio to Dallas/Fort Worth, as a future high-speed rail corridor. In 2010, TxDOT received a grant from FRA to study passenger rail in this corridor. The TOPRS will consider a range of passenger rail options for the 850-mile corridor. Today’s passenger rail service can range in speed from 79 miles per hour to more than 220 miles per hour. The different speed options will influence ridership, the number and 

location of stations, and costs. TxDOT and FRA will make decisions about TOPRS after reviewing input from the public and other public agencies. 

Schmerler Jessica Recommendation: TPWD recommends using existing railroad right-of-way (ROW) 

whenever possible. Where new construction is the only feasible option, TPWD recommends constructing the passenger rail along existing roads, pipelines, transmission lines, or other utility ROWs and easements to reduce habitat fragmentation. By utilizing previously disturbed existing utility corridors, county roads, highway, and railroad ROWs, adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources would be mitigated by avoiding and/or minimizing the impacts to undisturbed habitats. 

Schmerler Jessica Purpose and Scale of this Analysis 

The purpose of this letter is to communicate to TxDOT/FRA the general concerns TPWD has regarding potential impacts to natural resources from the construction of the proposed passenger rail. This letter is not intended to replace coordination with TPWD as the proposed project progresses. However, TPWD hopes to make TxDOT/FRA aware of potential concerns early in the planning process to help guide the design and location of the proposed passenger rail and minimize adverse impacts 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments to natural resources to the extent possible. 

Schmerler Jessica The proposed passenger rail may potentially cross the following Texas Conservation 

Action Plan’s (TCAP) eco-regions of Texas as shown on the attached map. (Including)Cross Timbers, Southern Texas Plains, East Central Texas Plains, Texas 

Blackland Prairies, Edwards Plateau and Western Gulf Coastal Plain. TPWD reviewed the eco-regions of Texas as designated by the TCAP. The TCAP’s purpose is to provide a statewide "roadmap" for research, restoration, management, and recovery projects addressing Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) and important habitats. SGCN include terrestrial, freshwater, and marine birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, invertebrates, fishes, plants, and plant communities. The goal of the plan is ultimately to conserve and improve the status of these species and, as possible, prevent listings under the Endangered Species Act. More information on the TCAP can be found at hgp://www.tpwd.state.TX.us/landwater/land/tcap/. Potential impacts to natural resources will generally vary by eco-region. This letter will attempt to address some of these potential impacts on a regional scale. Because a study area has not yet been determined, eco-regions that are traversed by IH 35 are included on the attached TCAP eco-region map. An additional eco-region that is not traversed by IH 35 was added (Western Gulf Coastal Plain eco-region) because there are several potential passenger rail routes in South Texas as displayed on the TOPRS corridor map that was issued at the Agency Scoping Meeting. 

Schmerler Jessica Information regarding natural resources and potential impacts is provided at a coarse 

scale, and general recommendations that apply to all eco-regions have been provided for your planning reference. As this project progresses and a study area is determined, it is recommended that TxDOT/F RA contact TPWD early in the planning process for 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments site-specific information and recommendations. 

Schmerler Jessica General Recommendations — All Eco-regions 

Below are bulleted lists of potential natural resource concerns that could be a result of the proposed project and recommendations to minimize adverse impacts. The recommendations and potential natural resource concerns listed below are applicable to all eco-regions listed above. Natural Resource Concerns: Clearing of woody vegetation, Introduction of non-native species in native grasslands/rangelands, Clearing/fragmentation of riparian corridors (route would cross most major rivers and many tributaries), Impacts to" aquatic species (freshwater mussels/designated mussel sanctuaries, fish, etc.), Direct and indirect (visual/noise) impacts to TPWD managed areas — taking of TPWD property, Direct and indirect (visual/noise) impacts to non-TPWD managed areas (federal, city, county, non-governmental organizations, etc.), Impacts to SGCN from TCAP as well as species shown on TPWD and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) county lists, Fragmentation of wildlife travel corridors, Removal of Whooping Crane stopover habitat in its migration corridor, Taking of USFWS designated critical habitat, Impacts to Colonial Waterbird Rookeries. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Schmerler Jessica Recommendations: 

Use native vegetation and water conservation in station landscaping, Use bridge spans rather than culverts where feasible to retain stream, characteristics and aquatic and terrestrial movement, Implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) for construction in wetlands/temporary crossings to minimize impacts, Construct wildlife crossings, particularly in wildlife travel corridors, Comply with applicable state and federal regulations (listed below). 

Schmerler Jessica Threatened and Endangered Species 

The TPWD county lists of rare and protected species may be obtained online at hgtp://wwwfgpwd.state.TX.us/landwater/land/maps/gis/ris/endangered species.phtml. The USFWS should be contacted for guidance, permitting, survey protocols, and mitigation for federally listed species. For USFWS threatened and endangered species lists by county please visit hgtp://www.fws.gov/endangered/. 

Schmerler Jessica Managed Areas 

Chapter 26 of Parks and Wildlife Code requires demonstration of no feasible or prudent alternative to taking of TPWD lands such as State Parks and Wildlife Management Areas (WMA). If the proposed passenger rail will cross any TPWD lands it will require an easement or transfer of property authorized by the TPWD Commission. This process can take several months to a year, and compensatory mitigation will be required. If the proposed project has the potential to impact a TPWD State Park, please contact David Riskind at (512) 389-4897 and if the project has the potential to impact a WMA, please contact DCI1IliS Gissell at (512) 389-4407. Please note that Chapter 26 of Parks and Wildlife Code also applies to public 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments areas that are managed by counties and cities. Coordination with the Grants-In-Aid Branch of TPWD and local park administrators is necessary to prevent conversion of grant-assisted lands to other than public outdoor recreation use as prohibited by Section 6(1) of the Land and Water Conservation Act. 

Schmerler Jessica State and Federal Regulations 

State and federal regulations that would pertain to the proposed project include (but are not limited to) the following: Federal Regulations: Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act, Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, U.S. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. 

Schmerler Jessica State Regulations: 

Chapter 86 of the Parks and Wildlife Code (State-owned Streambeds), Chapter 26 of Parks and Wildlife Code (Managed Areas), Section 68.015 of the Parks and Wildlife Code (Regulates State-listed Species), Sections 12.015, 12.019, and 66.015 of the Parks and Wildlife Code and Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 57.251-.259 

(regulates the introduction and stocking of fish, shellfish, and aquatic plants into public waters of the state). 

Schmerler Jessica Recommendation: TPWD recommends TxDOT/F RA strive to avoid impacts to 

potential natural resource concerns applicable to all eco-regions listed above and address avoidance, minimization, and mitigation plans for impacts to these resources in the service-level EIS. TPWD also recommends TxDOT/FRA address compliance with the above-listed state and federal regulations, as well as any others that pertain to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments the proposed passenger rail project, in the service- level EIS. 

Schmerler Jessica General Recommendations by Eco-region 

Cross Timbers Potential natural resource concerns associated with the Cross Timbers eco-region are listed below. Clearing of mesquite brush (northern part of the eco-region provides suitable habitat for the Texas kangaroo rat and Texas horned lizard), Clearing of woody vegetation/fragmentation (southern pan of the eco-region, provides suitable habitat for Black-capped Vireo (BCVI) and Golden-cheeked Warbler (GCWA), 

Wintering bald eagles, Interior least tem habitat (along and within the Red River). 

Schmerler Jessica Texas Blackland Prairies 

Potential natural resource concerns associated with the Texas Blackland Prairies, Ecoregion are listed below. Remnant native prairies/habitat for grassland birds and other grassland-dependent species, Clearing/fragmentation of BCVI and GCWA habitat. 

Schmerler Jessica Edwards Plateau 

Potential natural resource concerns associated with the Edwards Plateau eco-region are listed below. Clearing/fragmentation of BCVI and GCWA habitat, Karst species (salamanders and karst invertebrates), Bats (direct impacts to roosts), Edwards aquifer 

- water quality, Spring-fed streams. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Schmerler Jessica Southern Texas Plains 

Potential natural resource concerns associated with the Southern Texas Plains ecoregion are listed below. Rare and protected plants, Clearing/fragmentation of brush (Ocelot and Jaguarundi habitat), Impacts to Ocelot and Jaguarundi, Interior Least Tern (in and near Laredo, e.g., Lake Casa Blanca, Rio Grande), Fragmentation and introduction of invasive plant species in grasslands (e.g., in Coastal Sand Plain), Clearing/fragmentation of unique riparian corridors (i.e., ramaderos), Entrapment of wildlife, including listed species (the Texas tortoise in particular), between tracks, Impacts to state-listed reptiles (Texas horned lizard, Texas tortoise, Reticulate collared lizard, Texas indigo snake), Noise and lights in an otherwise minimally developed landscape. 

Schmerler Jessica Western Gulf Coastal Plains 

Potential natural resource concerns associated with the Western Gulf Coastal Plains eco-region are listed below. Large unfragmented tracts under single ownership/management, Fragmentation and introduction of invasive plant species in grasslands (e.g., Coastal Sand Plain), Clearing/fragmentation of brush (Ocelot and Jaguarundi habitat), Impacts to Ocelot and Jaguarondi, Entrapment of wildlife, including listed species (the Texas tortoise in particular), between tracks, Impacts to state-listed reptiles (Texas homed lizard, Texas tortoise, Reticulate collared lizard, Texas indigo snake) 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Schmerler Jessica East Central Texas Plains 

Potential natural resource concerns associated with the East Central Texas Plains ecoregion are listed below. Remnant native prairies/habitat for grassland birds and other grassland dependent species, Houston toad critical habitat. Please also refer to the email that was sent to Brian Hausknecht of CH2M Hill on 

March ll, 2013 regarding recommended Geographic Information System (GIS) data to 

assist in the TOPRS analysis. This email contains several GIS data sources that pertain to the above-listed natural resource concerns. This email is attached for your reference. TPWD appreciates the opportunity to provide preliminary input during the first agency scoping period for the Texas — Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study. Please contact me if you have any questions. 

Pullman Robert As you know, we are interested in working with TxDOT as the department develops 

plans for the IH-35 Corridor. We would seek the evaluation of Tubular Rail’s Drive on Drive off Truck Ferry (DDF) patented concept for the Oklahoma City to Rio Grande Valley alignment. Our hypothesis is simple; that development of the DDF will yield benefits to public safety, lower congestion levels and highway maintenance costs; create economic benefits for shippers and carriers through lower shipping and operating costs and is environmentally beneficial. Our claim, which we seek to have evaluated by or in conjunction with the TxDOT, is that the system will produce sufficient revenue to cover capital and operating costs, thus at least solving part of the highway funding issue and producing usable rail for passenger applications. At the end of March I made a fact finding trip through Kansas and Missouri evaluating acceptance and need. The transportation challenges faced in that part of the country 

differ from those in Texas only by geography and the below summation is based on 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments comments and concerns we heard expressed from, elected officials, railroads, private industry associations and the Missouri Department of Transportation. While the Kansas conversations centered on passenger rail and the need for funding to maintain Amtrak’s Southwest Chief ($100 million requested by BNSF), the Missouri discussions were very much about highway issues, particularly funding. In Kansas, which has the third most miles of railroads after Texas and Illinois, we found a growing resignation amongst elected officials that the State will most likely lose the Southwest Chief, Amtrak’s long distance train from Chicago to Los Angeles with several stops in Kansas. Currently running on a BNSF line roughly paralleling the BNSF’s TransCon through Kansas, the Southwest Chief needs a cash infusion to maintain this line at a track class that can accommodate 79mph speeds for passenger travel. BNSF’s freight on the line is not sufficient in volume nor is it time sensitive enough for the railroad to make the necessary investment. Politically, it is unlikely that the three states will collectively come up with the 100 million dollars plus 10 million annually to keep the once daily train running on this route. It is likely to be diverted through Oklahoma and Texas on a less direct route and merged with another train. 

Pullman Robert The situation is of interest to Tubular Rail as this is the very type of situation that the 

DDF could assist Amtrak’s operations as the line has current capacity but would need upgrading for DDF operations yet allowing passenger type use to continue. In conjunction with trackage in Missouri and Colorado, a continuous 700 mile segment could be assembled. In the last two weeks the Missouri Senate has passed a one 

percent increase in the State’s sales tax, at writing the measure is before the Missouri House of Representatives. If passed there, the measure would then go to the voters in 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 2014 and an uncertain outcome. 

Pullman Robert As written, the revenues from this measure are to be dedicated to transportation. 

Adding a lane in each direction to IH-70 is estimated to cost 3 billion dollars. What is not clear is if the sales tax measure will produce enough funds during its ten year life to meet IH-70’s needs as well as other areas of the state. What is certain is that the Dedicated Trucks Lanes project will not proceed as a toll road. Missouri’s rail picture is much more complicated than that found in Kansas but current active rail lines total 2500 miles less than the state had at its peak. We have identified some trackage that could be part of a tri-state system. In meeting with the Missouri DOT we learned that their biggest problem is that of funding. While there had been high hopes for the four state Dedicated Truck Lanes project, political reality has set in and hopes are now pinned on the sales tax measure. Two of the MoDOT personnel in the meeting dealt with trucking issues on a regular 

basis and were thus well versed on some of the Hours of Service issues as well as the overall commercial driver shortage. The other personnel were more from the planning side of transportation and had many question and comments on how a DDF project would impact existing traffic and if there was enough volume of longer haul trucks to be cost effective. We hope the MoDOT will be part of that evaluation. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Pullman Robert The brief outline below is taken from the DDF Proposal/concept paper.  

Implementation Issues: o Legal, particularly eminent domain and restoration of abandoned rail ROW’s; o Political; o Financing-revenues from truck, rail, and business related to ROW (fiber optics, pipeline etc.) o Partners: State DOT’s, FRA, US DOT, STB; o Competition; o Regulatory; o Coalition Building; o Business Model emphasizing a more limited Governmental role; o Developmental and Organizational issues, including ownership, operations and governmental issues; o Inertia  External Benefits: o Restoration of standard freight service; o Risk Factors; o Environmental pros and cons; o Loss of fuel tax revenue vs. lower maintenance; o HAZMAT; o Towns with restored rail service; o Development ideas, explaining how to develop the system from concept through construction and operation; o Supportive of short range, alternative- fuel trucks. (fuel cell, battery, etc.)  Technical Issues: o 45 to 50 mph average speed; o Requires class 3 track standard; o Engineering and selection of Design Build contractors; o Operator, operations, and potential customer inputs for types of service; o Engineering survey of existing conditions and obstructions; o Identify tasks, assign priorities, and determine responsibilities; o Width in cities and loop bypasses, economic development for impacted areas; o Location – determining what areas have both demand and available rail assets; o Prototyping of two full scale 

cars and testing 

Pullman Robert These issues are a place to start a feasibility assessment. We are sure there are more 

that will be raised but the unconventionality of the DDF approach must be viewed in light of the current situation and what forecasts are predicting for the future, both freight and climate. Much attention has been paid in recent years to the Public Private Partnership PPP approach to infrastructure needs. We don’t disagree that there are huge reserves of funds available for investment but if Governmental agencies want to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments tap these funds they must present options to investors that make sense to both the investment community and the public as well. In proposing the development of the DDF we seek a Partnership at the low cost “front end” and in so doing establish an approach that will lower risk levels prior to implementation. We also develop efficiencies over current transport methods to produce a revenue stream that actually lowers user’s costs rather than raising them. 

Heithaus Autumn I am in total support for Texas to take further steps to advance the current Heartland 

Flyer from Fort Worth - Ok City north through Wichita and connect in Newton to the SW Chief. Since 2006, I, with Mr. Evan Stair from Norman, OK, started the organization, the Northern Flyer Alliance. We have been working together to build support for bringing passenger rail service up through the IH-35 Corridor for the past seven years. The City of Wichita has taken over our efforts to support this initiative and our Kansas Legislators really want passenger rail service to expand from Newton, KS through Oklahoma and the State of Texas. The support exists in Kansas by our citizens and many of us in Kansas want this! I have collected many Resolutions over the years from Kansas organizations and cities that support passenger rail service along the IH-35 Corridor. I will help you in any way that I can to build this goal and bring passenger rail 

Little Owl Rebecca Please include the United States Section of the International Boundary and Water 

Commission (USIBWC) on the announcement of the availability of the Draft Service 

Level EIS. The project corridor may cross USIBWC's Lower Rio Grande Flood Control Project in the service areas of McAllen and Harlingen. 

McKenzie John I hope the passenger train service to south TX does happen. I remember when south 

TX had a passenger train which ran from Houston to Brownsville up until April 1966. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments Ridership was high but the Missouri Pacific wanted out of the passenger business. People will ride the train. Major cities along the way will benefit. It will be a great and safe alternative to the congested highways. There are a number of colleges as well as military installations along the route. I believe passenger train service will be a wise investment for Texas' future. We need it. 

Jacobs Ms. Johnnie Thank you for the correspondence regarding the above referenced project. The 

Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma has historic interest in various parts of Texas and Oklahoma. In order for us to more thoroughly evaluate our area of interest in relation to this project for NHPA Section 106 review, we would like to request that you send our office a copy of the GIS project line shape file so that we can do further examination. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or concerns. 

Fourkiller Tamara 

Francis 

Thank you for consulting with the Delaware Nation. We appreciate your willingness 

to conduct proper consultation with our nation. We received your letter regarding the above referenced project on April 23, 2013. Upon examination we are interested in these areas. Therefore, we will be a consulting party. Please send further project plans 

along with cultural resource surveys to our offices and set up a meeting date for the month of June. Should you have any questions regarding this email or future consultation feel free to contact our offices 

Griffin Debra The Region 6 office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has 

reviewed the March 13, 2013 Notice of Intel).t (N0l) to Prepare an EIS for the Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Corridor, South Texas to Oklahoma City. Our comments are provided pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508) and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. To assist in the scoping process for this project, we 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments have identified several issues for your attention in the preparation of the EIS and enclosed detailed scoping comments for your consideration. EPA is most concerned about the following issues: alternatives development, impacts to water and biological resources, invasive species management, habitat protection, air quality, indirect and cumulative impacts, climate change, environmental justice, and mitigation. EPA appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comments on the proposed project. Please send one hard copy of the draft EIS and four CDs to this office when completed and submitted for public comment. When you are ready to file the draft EIS with EPA, you may now electronically file it by using our e-NEPA Electronic Filing website http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/submiteis/index.html. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Rhonda Smith at 214-665-8126 or John MacFarlane of my staff at 214-665-7491 or macfarlane.john@epa.govforassistance. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Griffin Debra Proposed Project: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA), as amended, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) intends to prepare a 

Service Level/Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Oklahoma Department of Transportation, to 

analyze the impacts of a proposed new and/or improved high-speed intercity passenger rail service along an 850-mile corridor extending from Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to the south Texas cities of Laredo and Brownsville. This EIS will be used by the FRA in its decision making process to determine whether the project is in the public interest. The FRA will serve as the lead Federal agency under the NEPA process and is responsible for the preparation of the EIS. General EPA suggests utilizing the Regional Ecological Assessment Protocol (REAP) methodology to determine ecologically sensitive areas within the proposed project area that should be avoided or protected. REAP is a product of the Texas Environmental Resource Stewards (TERS) effort which analyzes existing broad-scale electronic data to identify important ecological areas in Texas. For more information on REAP, please call John MacFarlane at 214-665-7491. 

Griffin Debra Tiering: EPA understands the FRA will use a "tiered" approach to this project. The 

Tier 1, or Service Level, EIS will assess the broad corridor-wide impacts of a passenger rail system. The more detailed Tier 2 documentation would be required to examine the potential impacts of the site-specific projects that are advanced to implement the Tier 1 alternative selected. Any Tier 2 documents should incorporate by reference the general discussions and concentrate solely on the issues specific to the statement subsequently prepared 1. Statement of Purpose and Need: The EIS should clearly identify the underlying purpose and need to which the FRA is responding in proposing the alternatives. 2. The purpose of the proposed action is 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments typically the specific objectives of the activity, while the need for the proposed action may be to eliminate a broader underlying problem or take advantage of an opportunity. 

Griffin Debra Alternatives Analysis: NEPA requires evaluation of reasonable alternatives, including 

those that may not be within the jurisdiction of the lead agency. 3. A robust range of alternatives will include options for avoiding significant environmental impacts. The 

EIS should "rigorously explore and objectively evaluate all reasonable alternatives, 4. by developing a defined screening process. The screening process should rate each alternative against a set of pre-determined criteria. Each alternative should then be analyzed for its level of impact on a resource, e.g. no effect, negligible effect, minor effect, major effect, significant effect. Only that alternative that effectively meets or best meets all of the screening criteria should be recommended as the preferred alternative. The EIS should provide a clear discussion of the reasons for the elimination of alternatives which are not evaluated in detail. Section IS02.l4(d) requires the alternatives analysis to "include the alternative of no action." No Action means the proposed activity would not take place, and the resulting environmental effects from taking no action would be compared with the effects of permitting the proposed activity or an alternative activity to go forward. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Griffin Debra Affected Environment: This section should provide information on the existing 

resources and condition of the natural and built environment. It is a description of 

baseline conditions. These baseline conditions provide the context for evaluating environmental consequences and should include historical cumulative effects to the extent feasible. Environmental Consequences A majority of EISs contain a wellwritten section on the affected or existing environment. However, where most EISs fall short is the discussion of the environmental consequences of the proposed project. An analysis should follow an equation. First, what is the action? In this example, the action is filling wetlands. Second, what is the intensity or extent of impacts? In this example, the extent of proposed impacts is five acres. Third, is that significant? The EIS must answer that question and prove that the action of filling five acres ofwetlands is not significant by discussing rationale. If the action is significant, then the EIS must contain appropriate mitigation measures. 

Griffin Debra Water Resources: Water Supply and Water Quality Public drinking water supplies 

and/or their source areas often exist in many watersheds. Source water is water from streams, rivers, lakes, springs, and aquifers that is used as a supply of drinking water. 

Source water areas are delineated and mapped by the state for each federally regulated public water system. The 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act require federal agencies to protect sources of drinking water for communities. The EIS should address the potential effects of project discharges, if any, on surface water quality. Specific discharges should be identified and potential effects of discharges on designated beneficial uses of affected waters should be analyzed. 

Griffin Debra Stormwater The EIS should describe the original (natural) drainage patterns in the 

project locale, as well as the drainage patterns of the area during project operations. Also, the EIS should identify whether any components of the proposed project are 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments within a 50 or 100-year floodplain. The EIS should note that, under the Clean Water Act (CWA), any construction project disturbing a land area of one or more acres requires a construction stormwater discharge permit. 

Griffin Debra Waters of the United States, including Wetlands The project applicant should 

coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine if the proposed project requires a Section 404 permit under the CW A. Section 404 regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands and other special aquatic sites. The EPA recommends the FRA include a jurisdictional delineation for all waters of the U.S., including ephemeral drainages, in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the December 2006 Region Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of 

Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. A jurisdictional delineation will confirm the presence or absence of waters of the U.S. in the project area and help determine whether or not the proposed project would require a Section 404 permit. If a permit is required, the EPA will review the project for compliance with Federal Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Materials (40 CFR 230), promulgated pursuant to Section 404(b)(1) of the CW A. EPA encourages on-going coordination with the USACE during the planning, scoping, and construction phases. The EIS should demonstrate planning efforts to avoid, minimize, and compensate for wetland losses associated with the dredging, dredged material disposal, and other construction and operation activities. The EIS should also include an analysis of the potential for contaminated sediments to adversely impact the aquatic environment during construction and operation of the terminal. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Griffin Debra Impaired Waters The CWA requires States to develop a list of impaired waters that do 

not meet water quality standards, establish priority rankings, and develop action plans, called Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL), to improve water quality. The EIS should provide information on CWA Section 303(d) impaired waters in the project area, if any, and efforts to develop and revise TMDLs. The EIS should describe existing restoration and enhancement efforts for those waters, and any mitigation measures that will be implemented to avoid further degradation of impaired waters. 

Griffin Debra Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) - Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 

1966 includes a special provision that protects publicly owned parks, recreational areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, or public and private historical sites from being acquired for transportation projects. Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (L WCF) states that either the land or park appurtenances acquired with L WCF funds cannot be eliminated or acquired without coordination with the National Park Service and mitigation that replaces the eliminated items. If any 4(f) or 6(f) properties are within or near project corridors, they should be documented. A more thorough evaluation of potential impacts, alternatives, and mitigation should be included in appropriate Tier 2 documentation. Please be aware that vibration and noise can also adversely impact 4(f) and 6(f) properties. 

Griffin Debra Project Specific Locations (PSL) - PSLs outside the right-of-way that would be 

established to support construction of the roadway such as borrow and disposal sites, staging and storage areas, and concrete and aggregate plants, must be identified as direct impacts. The project team should strive to locate PSLs so they avoid environmentally sensitive areas. Ideally, PSLs should be located in previously disturbed, upland areas. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 

Griffin Debra Biological Resources. Habitat and Wildlife - The EIS should identify all petitioned 

and listed threatened and endangered species and critical habitat that might occur within the project area. The EIS should identify and quantify which species or critical habitat might be directly, indirectly, or cumulatively affected by each alternative and mitigate impacts to these species. EPA recommends that the FRA consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation to ensure that current and consistent surveying, monitoring, and reporting protocols are applied in protection and mitigation efforts. 

Griffin Debra Invasive Species - Executive Order 13112, Invasive Species (February 3, 1999), 

mandates that federal agencies take actions to prevent the introduction of invasive species, provide for their control, and minimize the economic, ecological, and human health impacts that invasive species cause. Executive Order 13112 also calls for the restoration of native plants and tree species. If the proposed project will entail new landscaping, the EIS should describe how the project will meet the requirements of Executive Order 13112. In addition, we encourage alternative management practices that limit herbicide use (as a last resort), focusing instead on other methods to limit invasive species vegetation and decrease fire risk. Possible alternatives include mowing and weed control fabric, which may need a layer of soil to prevent degradation due to ultraviolet light. 

Griffin Debra Air Quality - The EIS should provide a detailed discussion of ambient air conditions 

(baseline or existing conditions), National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and non-NAAQS pollutants, criteria pollutant nonattainment areas, and potential air 

quality impacts of the proposed project (including cumulative and indirect impacts). Such an evaluation is necessary to understand the potential impacts from temporary, 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments long-term, or cumulative degradation of air quality. 

Griffin Debra The EIS should describe and estimate air emissions from potential construction and 

maintenance activities, as well as proposed mitigation measures to minimize those emissions. EPA recommends an evaluation of the following measures to reduce emissions of criteria air pollutants and hazardous air pollutants (air toxics). 

Griffin Debra Existing Conditions -The EIS should provide a detailed discussion of ambient air 

conditions, National Ambient Air Quality Standards, and criteria pollutant nonattainment areas in the vicinity of the project. 

Griffin Debra Quantify Emissions -The EIS should estimate emissions of criteria and hazardous air 

pollutants (air toxics) from the proposed project and discuss the timeframe for release of these emissions over the lifespan of the project. The EIS should describe and estimate emissions from potential construction activities, as well as proposed 

mitigation measures to minimize these emissions. • Provide a comparison of proposed project emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with the general conformity de minimis levels (40 CFR 93.153) for the Dallas/Fort Worth 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS moderate nonattainment area (100 tons/year NOx, 100 tons/year VOCs) to determine the applicability of general conformity to this project. 

Griffin Debra Specify Emission Sources -The EIS should specify all emission sources by pollutant 

from mobile sources (on and off-road), stationary sources (including portable and temporary emission units), fugitive emission sources, area sources, and ground disturbance. This source specific information should be used to identify appropriate mitigation measures and areas in need of the greatest attention. • Clearly identify in 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments the EIS any construction phases/other aspects of project alternatives that may already be accounted for in existing Transportation Improvement Program/Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Dallas/Fort Worth 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS moderate nonattainment area. 

Griffin Debra Construction Emissions Mitigation Plan -The EIS should include a draft Construction 

Emissions Mitigation Plan and ultimately adopt this plan in the Record of Decision. In 

addition to all applicable local, state, or federal requirements, we recommend the following control measures (Fugitive Dust, Mobile and Stationary Source and 

Administrative) be included in the Construction Emissions Mitigation Plan in order to 

Griffin Debra reduce impacts associated with emissions of particulate matter and other toxics from 

construction-related activities: • Fugitive Dust Source Controls: The EIS should identify the need for a Fugitive Dust Control Plan to reduce Particulate Matter 10 and Fine Particulate Matter 2.5 emissions during construction and operations. We recommend that the plan include these general commitments: • Stabilize heavily used unpaved construction roads with a non-toxic soil stabilizer or soil weighting agent that will not result in loss of vegetation, or increase other environmental impacts. • During grading, use water, as necessary, on disturbed areas in construction sites to control visible plumes. • Vehicle speed 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments • Limit speeds to 25 miles per hour on stabilized unpaved roads as long as such speeds do not create visible dust emissions. • Limit speeds to 10 miles per hour or less on unpaved areas within construction sites on un-stabilized (and unpaved) roads. • Post visible speed limit signs at construction site entrances. • Inspect and was construction equipment vehicle tires, as necessary, so they are free of dirt before entering paved roadways, if applicable. • Provide gravel ramps of at least 20 feet in length at tire washing/cleaning stations, and ensure construction vehicles exit construction sites through treated entrance roadways, unless an alternative route has been approved by appropriate lead agencies, if applicable. • Use sandbags or equivalent effective measures to prevent run-off to roadways in construction areas adjacent to paved roadways. Ensure consistency with the project's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, if such a plan is required for the project.. • Sweep the first 500 feet of paved roads exiting construction sites, other unpaved 

roads en route from the construction site, or construction staging areas whenever dirt or runoff from construction activity is visible on paved roads, or at least twice daily (less during periods of precipitation). • Stabilize disturbed soils (after active construction activities are completed) with a non-toxic soil stabilizer, soil weighting agent, or other approved soil stabilizing method. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments • Cover or treat soil storage piles with appropriate dust suppressant compounds and 

disturbed areas that remain inactive for longer than 10 days. Provide vehicles (used to transport solid bulk material on public roadways and that have potential to cause visible emissions) with covers. Alternatively, sufficiently wet and load materials onto the trucks in a manner to provide at least one foot of freeboard. • Use wind erosion control techniques (such as windbreaks, water, chemical dust suppressants, and/or vegetation) where soils are disturbed in construction, access and maintenance routes, and materials stock pile areas. Keep related windbreaks in place until the soil is stabilized or permanently covered with vegetation. • Mobile and Stationary Source Controls: • If practicable, lease new, clean equipment meeting the most stringent of applicable Federals or State Standards. In general, commit to the best available emissions control technology. Tier 4 engines should be used for project construction equipment to the maximum extent feasible. • Where Tier 4 engines are not available, we recommend use of EPA-verified particulate traps, oxidation catalysts and other appropriate controls where suitable to reduce emissions of diesel particulate matter and other pollutants to no more than Tier 2 levels. • Consider using electric vehicles, natural gas, biodiesel, or other alternative fuels during construction and operation phases to reduce the project's criteria and greenhouse gas emissions. • Plan construction scheduling to minimize vehicle trips. 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments • Limit idling of heavy equipment to less than 5 minutes and verify through unscheduled inspections. • Maintain and tune engines per manufacturer's specifications to perform at EPA certification levels, prevent tampering, and conduct unscheduled inspections to ensure these measures are followed. • Administrative controls: • Develop construction traffic and parking management plan that maintains traffic flow and plan construction to minimize vehicle trips. • Identify any sensitive receptors in the project area, such as children, elderly, and the infirmed, and specify the means by which impacts to these populations will be minimized (e.g. located construction equipment and staging zones away from sensitive receptors and building air intakes). • Include provisions for monitoring fugitive dust in the fugitive dust control plan and initiate increased mitigation measures to abate any visible dust plumes. 

Griffin Debra Climate Change - Scientific evidence supports the concern that continued increases in 

greenhouse gas emissions resulting from human activities will contribute to climate change. Global warming is caused by emissions of carbon dioxide and other heattrapping gases. On December 7, 2009, the EPA determined that Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) contribute to air pollution that "endangers public health and welfare" within the meaning of the Clean Air Act. Higher temperatures and increased winter rainfall will be accompanied by a reduction in snow pack, earlier snowmelts, and increased runoff. Some of the impacts, such as reduced groundwater discharge, and more 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments frequent and severe drought conditions, may impact the proposed projects. The EIS should consider how climate change could potentially influence the proposed project, specifically within sensitive areas, and assess how the projected impacts could be exacerbated by climate change and strategies for climate change adaptation planning. For example, measures for climate change adaptation should consider potentially increased drainage needs. 

Griffin Debra Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Emissions 

On February 18, 2010, the CEQ issued draft language to Federal Agencies on analyzing the effects of GHG emissions and climate change when describing the environmental effects of a proposed agency action in accordance with NEPA. CEQ's draft guidance defines GHG emissions in accordance with Section 19(i) of Executive Order 13514 Federal Leadership in Environment, Energy, and Economic Performance (October 5, 2009) to include carbon dioxide (C02), methane (C~), nitrous oxide (N20), 

hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbon (PFCs), and sulfurhexafluoride (SF 6). Because C02 is the reference gas for climate change based on their potential to absorb 

heat in the atmosphere, measures of non-C02 GHGs should be reflected as CO2-

equivalent (Core) values. EPA supports evaluation and disclosure of GHG emissions and climate change effects resulting from the proposed project during all project phases, including (1) pre-construction (e.g., transportation, mobilization, and staging), (2) construction, (3) operation, (4) maintenance, and (5) decommissioning. We recommend that the GHG emission accounting/inventory include each proposed stationary source (e.g., power plant, liquefaction facility, compressor and metering stations, etc.) and mobile emissions source (e.g., heavy equipment, supply barges, rail transports, etc.). We also 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments recommend that the EIS establish reasonable spatial and temporal boundaries for this analysis, and that the EIS quantify and disclose the expected annual direct and indirect GHG emissions for the proposed action. In the analysis of direct effects, we recommend that the EIS quantify cumulative emissions over the life of the project, discuss measures to reduce GHG emissions, including consideration of reasonable alternatives. EPA recommends that the EIS consider mitigation measures and reasonable alternatives to reduce action related GHG emissions, and include a discussion of cumulative effects of GHG emissions related to the proposed action. 

Griffin Debra Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste/Solid Waste 

The EIS should address potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of hazardous waste from construction and operation of the proposed project. The document should identify projected hazardous waste types and volumes, and expected 

storage, disposal, and management plans. It should identify any hazardous materials sites within the project's study area and evaluate if those sites would impact the project in any way. 

Griffin Debra Coordination with Tribal Governments 

Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (November 6, 2000), was issued in order to establish regular and meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials in the development of federal policies that have tribal implications, and to strengthen the United States government-to-government relationships with Indian tribes. If applicable, the EIS should describe the process and outcome of government-to-government consultation between the FAA and with any and each of the tribal governments within the project 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments area, issues that were raised (if any), and how those issues were addressed in the selection of the proposed alternative. Because this project will have a portion of the proposed rail line in Oklahoma, EPA strongly recommends that the FRA initiate consultation with Tribal governments as early as possible because of the unique legal relationship the U.S. Government has with federally recognized tribes based on the Constitution, treaties, statutes, Executive Orders, and court decisions. This relationship includes recognition of the right of tribes as sovereign governments to self-determination, and an acknowledgment of the federal government's trust responsibility to tribes. The precise nature of this relationship will vary depending 

upon the identity of the tribes and nature of trust resources involved. 

Griffin Debra National Historic Preservation Act 

Consultation for tribal cultural resources is required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Historic properties under the NHP A are properties that are included in the National Register of Historic Places or that meet the 

criteria for the National Register. Section 106 of the NHPA requires a federal agency, upon determining that activities under its control could affect historic properties, 

consult with the appropriate State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO)/Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO). Under NEPA, any impacts to tribal, cultural, or other treaty resources must be discussed and mitigated. Section 106 of the NHP A requires that Federal agencies consider the effects of their actions on cultural resources, following regulation in 36 CFR 800. The EIS should address the existence of cultural and historic resources, including Indian sacred sites, in the project areas, and address compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA. It should also address Executive Order 13007, distinguish it from Section 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments 106 of the NHPA, and discuss how the FRA will avoid adversely affecting the physical integrity, accessibility, or use of sacred sites, if they exist. The EIS should provide a summary of all coordination with Tribes and with the SHPO/THPO, including identification of NRHP eligible sites, and development of a Cultural Resource Management Plan. 

Griffin Debra Environmental Justice and Impacted Communities 

Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (February 11, 1994) and the Interagency Memorandum of Understanding on Environmental Justice (August 4,2011) directs federal agencies to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations, allowing those populations a meaningful opportunity to participate in the decision-making process. Guidance 7 by CEQ clarifies the terms low-income and minority population (which includes Native Americans) and describes the factors to consider when evaluating disproportionately high and adverse human health effects. The EIS should include an evaluation of environmental justice populations within the geographic scope of the projects. If such populations exist, the EIS should address the potential for disproportionate adverse impacts to minority and low-income populations, and the approaches used to foster public participation by these populations. Assessment of the project's impact on minority and low-income populations should reflect coordination with those affected populations. The EIS should also describe outreach and public involvement conducted to all other communities that could be affected by the project, since rural communities may be among the most vulnerable to health risks associated with the project. Please refer to 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments EPA's EJ website8 for additional information. 

Griffin Debra Indirect and Cumulative Impacts 

The indirect impacts analysis should identify how resources, ecosystems, and communities in the vicinity of the project are affected by the proposed project later in time or father removed in distance. We recommend focusing on induced growth and development and other effects related to induced changes in the pattern of land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air, water and other natural systems, including ecosystems. The cumulative impacts analysis should identify how resources, ecosystems, and communities in the vicinity of the project have already been, or will be, affected by past, present, or future activities in the project area. These resources should be characterized in terms of their response to change and capacity to withstand stresses. Trends data should be used to establish a baseline for the affected resources, to evaluate the significance of historical degradation, and to predict the environmental effects of the project components. For the cumulative impacts assessment, we recommend focusing on resources of concern or resources that are "at risk" and/or are significantly impacted by the proposed project, before mitigation. For this project, the FRA should conduct a 

thorough assessment of the cumulative impacts to aquatic and biological resources and air quality, especially in the context of the other developments occurring and proposed in the area. The EIS should also delineate appropriate geographic boundaries, including natural 

ecological boundaries, whenever possible, and should evaluate the time period of the 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments project's effects. For instance, for a discussion of cumulative wetland impacts, a natural geographic boundary such as a watershed or sub-watershed could be 

identified. The time period, or temporal boundary, could be defined as from 1972 (when the CWA established Section 404) to the present. Please refer to the Council on Environmental Quality's "Considering Cumulative Effects Under the National Environmental Policy Act, and EPA's "Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents” for assistance with identifying appropriate boundaries and identifying appropriate past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects to include in the analysis. 

Griffin Debra Mitigation and Monitoring 

Within the process of developing the EIS, if impacts to waters of the U.S. and wetlands require a USACE permit and are significant, a draft mitigation plan should also be developed and made available to EPA prior to the release of the Final EIS. A draft mitigation plan should strive for avoidance and minimization first and should outline appropriate compensation and enhancement measures for unavoidable impacts to wetlands and special aquatic sites. A draft plan should include the evaluation of the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative, according to the Section 404(b)(1) guidelines and should outline a monitoring plan. Please note that any compensatory mitigation plan must fully comply with the Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources; Final Rule (Mitigation Rule) effective June 9, 2008. 

Griffin Debra Coordination with Land Use Planning Activities 

The EIS should discuss how the proposed action would support or conflict with the objectives of federal, state, tribal or local land use plans, policies and controls in the project areas. The term "land use plans" includes all types of formally adopted 
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

Commenter (last name, first name) 

Comments documents for land use planning, conservation, zoning and related regulatory requirements. Proposed plans not yet developed should also be addressed if they have been formally proposed by the appropriate government body in a written form (CEQ's Forty Questions, #23b). 

a Comments are the verbatim, unedited content of each comment, listed by commenter and categorized by topic area. 

TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

SCOPING REPORT 

 4-1 in coordination with Oklahoma DOT 

4.0 Next steps 

Following the service-level EIS scoping process, the study team will conduct an alternatives 

analysis to identify an initial set of proposed route and service level alternatives based on the 

purpose and need of the Program and will consider the comments received during the scoping 

process. These initial alternatives will then be evaluated to determine which alternatives TxDOT 

and FRA will fully evaluate through the service-level EIS process and which alternatives would 

be considered infeasible or would not meet the Program purpose and need and which would 

therefore be removed from further consideration. Throughout the alternatives analysis process, 

the study team will coordinate with federal, state, and local agencies. 

Once TxDOT and FRA have determined that alternatives that will be evaluated in the draft 

service-level EIS, the study team will begin analysis of existing conditions in the study area and 

potential service-level impacts of the study alternatives. Throughout the evaluation process, the 

study team will coordinate with federal, state, and local agencies. TxDOT will also continue to 

conduct public outreach to apprise the public the Study’s progress and provide the opportunity 

for input. 

The analysis of existing conditions and potential impacts of the alternatives will then be 

documented in the draft service-level EIS, which FRA and TxDOT will publish for public 

comment. A 45-day comment period will begin after publication of the Notice of Availability of 

the draft service-level EIS in the Federal Register. TxDOT will distribute Notices of Availability 

to recipients on the Study mailing list and to potentially affected property owners. In addition, 

the draft EIS will be posted on the Study website. Public hearings will be conducted in the study 

area to provide the public the opportunity to review a summary of the contents of the draft 

service-level EIS and to provide comments. These public hearings will be advertised in local 

newspapers, included in the Notice of Availability, and posted on the Study website. 

After close of the public comment period and review of agency and public comments on the draft 

EIS, TxDOT, in conjunction with FRA, will identify preferred route and service-level 

alternatives. The final service-level EIS is expected to be completed in late 2014, with issuance 

of a ROD by the end of 2014. Following completion of the service-level EIS, the selected 

alternative may be further developed and would undergo project-level environmental review that 

may incorporate by reference the data and evaluations included in the service-level EIS. 

Subsequent project-level evaluations would concentrate on issues specific to each project.

SCOPING REPORT 

Appendix A 

Notice of Intent 

16036 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2013 / Notices 

name of the individual submitting the 

comment (or of the person signing the 

comment, if submitted on behalf of an 

association, business, labor union, etc.). 

You may review DOT’s Privacy Act 

Statement for the Federal Docket 

Management System (FDMS) published 

in the Federal Register on December 29, 

2010 (75 FR 82132), or you may visit 

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010- 

12-29/pdf/2010-32876.pdf. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elaine M. Papp, Chief, Medical 

Programs Division, 202–366–4001, 

fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, 

Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64– 

224, Washington, DC 20590–0001. 

Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, 

FMCSA may renew an exemption from 

the vision requirements in 49 CFR 

391.41(b)(10), which applies to drivers 

of CMVs in interstate commerce, for a 

two-year period if it finds ‘‘such 

exemption would likely achieve a level 

of safety that is equivalent to or greater 

than the level that would be achieved 

absent such exemption.’’ The 

procedures for requesting an exemption 

(including renewals) are set out in 49 

CFR part 381. 

Exemption Decision 

This notice addresses 5 individuals 

who have requested renewal of their 

exemptions in accordance with FMCSA 

procedures. FMCSA has evaluated these 

5 applications for renewal on their 

merits and decided to extend each 

exemption for a renewable two-year 

period. They are: 

Richard D. Carlson (MN) 

Robert P. Conrad, Sr. (MD) 

Donald P. Dodson, Jr. (WV) 

James A. Stoudt (PA) 

Ralph A. Thompson (KY) 

The exemptions are extended subject 

to the following conditions: (1) That 

each individual has a physical 

examination every year (a) by an 

ophthalmologist or optometrist who 

attests that the vision in the better eye 

continues to meet the requirements in 

49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), and (b) by a 

medical examiner who attests that the 

individual is otherwise physically 

qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that 

each individual provides a copy of the 

ophthalmologist’s or optometrist’s 

report to the medical examiner at the 

time of the annual medical examination; 

and (3) that each individual provide a 

copy of the annual medical certification 

to the employer for retention in the 

driver’s qualification file and retains a 

copy of the certification on his/her 

person while driving for presentation to 

a duly authorized Federal, State, or local 

enforcement official. Each exemption 

will be valid for two years unless 

rescinded earlier by FMCSA. The 

exemption will be rescinded if: (1) The 

person fails to comply with the terms 

and conditions of the exemption; (2) the 

exemption has resulted in a lower level 

of safety than was maintained before it 

was granted; or (3) continuation of the 

exemption would not be consistent with 

the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 

31136(e) and 31315. 

Basis for Renewing Exemptions 

Under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1), an 

exemption may be granted for no longer 

than two years from its approval date 

and may be renewed upon application 

for additional two year periods. In 

accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 

31315, each of the 5 applicants has 

satisfied the entry conditions for 

obtaining an exemption from the vision 

requirements (63 FR 66226; 64 FR 

16517; 65 FR 20245; 65 FR 57230; 65 FR 

78256; 66 FR 16311; 66 FR 17994; 67 FR 

57266; 67 FR 76439; 68 FR 10298; 68 FR 

13360; 68 FR 15037; 69 FR 52741; 70 FR 

12265; 70 FR 14747; 70 FR 16887; 70 FR 

2701; 70 FR 7545; 72 FR 12665; 74 FR 

9329; 76 FR 15360). Each of these 5 

applicants has requested renewal of the 

exemption and has submitted evidence 

showing that the vision in the better eye 

continues to meet the requirement 

specified at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and 

that the vision impairment is stable. In 

addition, a review of each record of 

safety while driving with the respective 

vision deficiencies over the past two 

years indicates each applicant continues 

to meet the vision exemption 

requirements. 

These factors provide an adequate 

basis for predicting each driver’s ability 

to continue to drive safely in interstate 

commerce. Therefore, FMCSA 

concludes that extending the exemption 

for each renewal applicant for a period 

of two years is likely to achieve a level 

of safety equal to that existing without 

the exemption. 

Request for Comments 

FMCSA will review comments 

received at any time concerning a 

particular driver’s safety record and 

determine if the continuation of the 

exemption is consistent with the 

requirements at 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 

31315. However, FMCSA requests that 

interested parties with specific data 

concerning the safety records of these 

drivers submit comments by April 12, 

2013. 

FMCSA believes that the 

requirements for a renewal of an 

exemption under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 

31315 can be satisfied by initially 

granting the renewal and then 

requesting and evaluating, if needed, 

subsequent comments submitted by 

interested parties. As indicated above, 

the Agency previously published 

notices of final disposition announcing 

its decision to exempt these 5 

individuals from the vision requirement 

in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). The final 

decision to grant an exemption to each 

of these individuals was made on the 

merits of each case and made only after 

careful consideration of the comments 

received to its notices of applications. 

The notices of applications stated in 

detail the qualifications, experience, 

and medical condition of each applicant 

for an exemption from the vision 

requirements. That information is 

available by consulting the above cited 

Federal Register publications. 

Interested parties or organizations 

possessing information that would 

otherwise show that any, or all, of these 

drivers are not currently achieving the 

statutory level of safety should 

immediately notify FMCSA. The 

Agency will evaluate any adverse 

evidence submitted and, if safety is 

being compromised or if continuation of 

the exemption would not be consistent 

with the goals and objectives of 49 

U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will 

take immediate steps to revoke the 

exemption of a driver. 

Issued on: March 4, 2013. 

Larry W. Minor, 

Associate Administrator for Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2013–05746 Filed 3–12–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Railroad Administration 

Service Level Environmental Impact 

Statement for the Texas Oklahoma 

Passenger Rail Study Corridor, South 

Texas to Oklahoma City 

AGENCY: Federal Railroad 

Administration (FRA). 

ACTION: Notice of Intent To Prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 

SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to 

advise the public that it will prepare a 

Service Level/Tier 1 EIS with the Texas 

Department of Transportation (TxDOT) 

to study potential new and/or improved 

high-speed intercity passenger rail 

service along an 850-mile corridor 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2013 / Notices 16037 

extending from Oklahoma City, 

Oklahoma, to the south Texas cities of 

Laredo and Brownsville (proposed 

action). In addition to the Service Level 

EIS, the Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

Study (Study) also includes preparation 

of a service development plan for the 

corridor for each of three sections of the 

corridor: Oklahoma City to Dallas/Fort 

Worth, Dallas/Fort Worth to San 

Antonio, and San Antonio to south 

Texas. The Oklahoma Department of 

Transportation (ODOT) is a partnering 

state agency in the development of the 

EIS. The Service Level EIS will evaluate 

a reasonable range of corridor 

alternatives and make decisions 

regarding the preferred corridor, 

location of train service termini, 

location of intermediate stops, the level 

of service, and future planning for 

projects to implement the service. 

Alternatives under consideration will 

include a No Action (No Build) 

alternative, as well as multiple build 

alternatives. The build alternatives may 

include infrastructure improvements in 

existing or prior rail corridors, the 

development of one or more new rail 

corridors, or a combination of both, as 

well as varying levels of service. FRA is 

issuing this Notice to solicit public and 

agency input in the development of the 

scope of the EIS and to advise the public 

that FRA and TxDOT will conduct 

outreach activities regarding the scope 

of the EIS. To ensure all significant 

issues are identified and considered, the 

public is invited to comment on the 

scope of the EIS, including the purpose 

and need, alternatives to be considered, 

impacts to be evaluated, and 

methodologies to be used in the 

evaluation. 

DATES: Written comments on the scope 

of the Service Level EIS for the Texas 

Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study should 

be provided to TxDOT by April 26, 

2013. Comments will also be accepted at 

public scoping meetings to be held from 

March 25, 2013, through April 4, 2013, 

at the times and locations identified 

below: 

• Oklahoma City: Metro Tech Center, 

1900 Springlake Drive, Oklahoma City, 

OK on March 25, 2013 from 2 p.m. 

through 4 p.m. and from 6 p.m. through 

8 p.m. 

• Ardmore: Ardmore Train Station, 

251 E. Main Street, Ardmore, OK on 

March 26, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 

p.m. 

• Sherman: Sherman Senior Center, 

1500 N. Broughton Street, Sherman, TX 

on April 2, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 

p.m. 

• Fort Worth: TxDOT Training 

Offices, 2501 SW Loop 820, Fort Worth, 

TX on March 28, 2013 from 6 p.m. 

through 8 p.m. 

• Dallas: MSDC Offices, 8828 N. 

Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, TX on April 

3, 2013 from 2 p.m. through 4 p.m. and 

from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m. 

• Belton: Central Texas Council of 

Governments, 2180 N, Main Street, 

Belton, TX on April 1, 2013 from 6 p.m. 

through 8 p.m. 

• Waco: Heart of Texas Council of 

Governments, 1514 S. New Road, Waco, 

TX on March 25, 2013 from 6 p.m. 

through 8 p.m. 

• Austin: TxDOT Austin Office, 

Building 7, 7901 N. IH 35, Austin, TX 

on March 27, 2013 from 2 p.m. through 

4 p.m. and from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m. 

• Windcrest: Windcrest Civic Center, 

9310 Jim Seal Drive, Windcrest, TX on 

April 1, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 

p.m. 

• Harlingen: Harlingen City Hall, 502 

E. Tyler Avenue, Harlingen, TX on April 

4, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m. 

• Corpus Christi: TxDOT Offices, 

1701 S. Padre Island Drive, Corpus 

Christi, TX on April 2, 2013 from 6 p.m. 

through 8 p.m. 

• Laredo: TxDOT Offices, 1817 Bob 

Bullock Avenue, Laredo, TX on April 3, 

2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the 

scope of this study should be mailed or 

emailed to Mr. Mark Werner, Rail 

Division, Texas Department of 

Transportation, 125 E. 11th Street, 

Austin, TX 78701–2483. The email 

address is provided on the project Web 

site: www.txokrail.org. 

The buildings used for the scoping 

meetings are accessible to persons with 

disabilities. Any individual who 

requires special assistance, such as a 

sign language interpreter, to participate 

in the meetings should contact Mr. Mark 

Werner, Project Manager, Texas 

Department of Transportation, (512) 

486–5137, seven calendar days prior to 

the meeting. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Mark Werner, Project Manager, TxDOT, 

125 E. 11th Street, Austin, TX 78701– 

2483, (512) 486–5137; or Ms. Catherine 

Dobbs, Office of Railroad Policy and 

Development, Federal Railroad 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 

(202) 493–6347 . Information and 

documents regarding the Service Level 

EIS and environmental process will be 

made available for the duration of the 

environmental process at: 

www.txokrail.org. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Environmental Review Process 

The Service Level (Tier 1) EIS will be 

prepared in accordance with the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA), the Council on Environmental 

Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing 

NEPA and the FRA’s Procedures for 

Considering Environmental Impacts as 

set forth in 64 FR 28545 dated May 26, 

1999 (Environmental Procedures). The 

Service Level EIS will also address 

Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act, Section 4(f) of the U.S. 

Department of Transportation Act of 

1966 (49 U.S.C. 303) and other 

applicable Federal and state laws and 

regulations. The Service Level EIS and 

any subsequent project (Tier 2) 

environmental documents will be 

developed in accordance with CEQ 

regulations, FRA’s Environmental 

Procedures, and FRA’s Update to NEPA 

Implementing Procedures (78 FR 2713; 

January 14, 2013). 

FRA and TxDOT will use a tiered 

process, as provided for in 40 CFR 

1508.28, in the completion of the 

environmental review of the Study. 

‘‘Tiering’’ is a staged environmental 

review process applied to 

environmental reviews for complex 

projects. The Service Level EIS will 

address first tier of broad corridor issues 

and alternatives. Subsequent projectlevel second tier NEPA evaluations will 

analyze site-specific projects based on 

the decisions made at the Service Level. 

The Service Level NEPA assessment 

will result in an EIS with the 

appropriate level of detail for corridor 

decisions and will address broad overall 

issues of concern, including but not 

limited to: 

• Confirm the purpose and need for 

the proposed action. 

• Confirm the study area appropriate 

to assess reasonable alternatives. 

• Identify a comprehensive set of 

goals and objectives for the corridor in 

conjunction with stakeholders. These 

goals and objectives will be crafted to 

allow comprehensive evaluation of all 

aspects of study alternatives necessary 

to achieve the goals, including train 

operations, vehicles, and infrastructure. 

• Develop alternative evaluation 

criteria based on purpose and need, 

goals and objectives. 

• Identify the range of reasonable 

alternatives to be considered, consistent 

with the current and planned use of the 

corridor and the existing services within 

and adjacent to the study area, as well 

as considering a no action/no build 

alternative. 

• Identify the general corridor 

alignment(s) and right-of-way 

requirements of the reasonable build 

alternatives. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

16038 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2013 / Notices 

• Identify, at a corridor planning 

level, the infrastructure and equipment 

investment requirements for the 

reasonable build alternatives. 

• Include the consideration of the NoBuild Alternative which will be studied 

as the baseline for comparison with the 

build alternatives. The No-Build 

Alternative represents other 

transportation modes such as auto, air 

travel, intercity bus, and existing rail 

and the physical characteristics and 

capacities as they exist at the time of the 

Service Level EIS, with planned and 

funded improvements that will be in 

place at the time rail improvements 

would become operational. 

• Evaluate and describe, at a corridor 

planning level, the potential 

environmental consequences (benefits 

and adverse effects to the human and 

natural environment) associated with 

the reasonable alternatives. 

• Establish the timing and sequencing 

and future NEPA processes for 

component actions to implement the 

proposed action. 

• Identify preferred alternatives for 

corridor route alignment within each of 

the three corridor sections. 

Subsequent to this Service Level EIS, 

project level assessment(s) will address 

component projects to be implemented 

within the selected general corridor and 

where appropriate will incorporate by 

reference the data and evaluations 

included in the Service Level EIS. 

Subsequent evaluations will concentrate 

on the issues specific to the component 

of the alternative selected with the 

Service Level EIS, identify the Project 

alternatives that meet the purpose and 

need for each component project, and 

analyze the specific environmental 

consequences and measures necessary 

to mitigate environmental impacts at a 

site-specific level of detail. This Service 

Level EIS process will be coordinated 

with the ongoing preliminary 

engineering and environmental 

planning efforts for the Dallas/Fort 

Worth—Houston passenger rail corridor. 

II. Project Background 

The 850-mile Texas Oklahoma 

Passenger Rail Study Corridor extends 

from Oklahoma City in the north 

through Dallas, Fort Worth, Austin, and 

San Antonio to destinations in south 

Texas including Laredo, Corpus Christi, 

and Brownsville. Existing passenger rail 

service includes intercity service on the 

Heartland Flyer (Oklahoma City to Fort 

Worth), Texas Eagle (Fort Worth to San 

Antonio), and Sunset Limited (Los 

Angeles to New Orleans via San 

Antonio) operated by Amtrak, and 

regional/commuter rail service on the 

Trinity Railway Express (Dallas to Fort 

Worth) and Capital MetroRail (Austin) 

operated by Texas operators. Intercity 

passenger rail between Oklahoma City 

and San Antonio provides service to 

cities and communities generally along 

the Interstate 35 (I–35) corridor. The 

purpose of Study is to evaluate 

alternatives to provide higher speed 

passenger rail service to meet future 

intercity travel demand and to improve 

rail facilities, reduce journey times, and 

improve connections with regional 

public transit services. These 

improvements are needed because of the 

current and forecast population and 

business growth within the study area 

that has resulted in growing congestion 

on highways and rail services along the 

Interstate 35 (I–35) corridor. 

The I–35 corridor, running from 

Duluth, Minnesota, to Laredo, Texas, is 

a congressionally identified corridor of 

national significance and is one of the 

fastest growing regions in the U.S., 

running through six of the largest urban 

areas and nine of the 50 largest cities in 

the U.S. International truck traffic 

demand, intercity truck traffic demand, 

and passenger travel demand compete 

for highway capacity, creating 

substantial congestion inside the urban 

areas through which the highway runs. 

Projections for the Dallas/Fort Worth to 

San Antonio portion of the corridor 

show average speeds along I–35 would 

drop from 55 to 15 miles per hour by 

2035. 

Transportation plans for Texas and 

Oklahoma have identified substantial 

population growth and population aging 

within the Study corridor. Texas 

population is expected to grow by 39% 

from 2010 to 2035. The population of 

the Texas Triangle (a region of Texas 

bounded by Dallas, Houston, and San 

Antonio) has been growing rapidly over 

the last several decades, with growth 

rates in some areas as high as 27%. 

Texas’ population has grown making it 

the second most populous state in the 

U.S. with most of the state’s population 

centered in the eastern half of the state, 

along and east of the I–35 corridor. 

Oklahoma City is expected to see a 

population increase of 25% from 2000 

to 2035, with intensified population 

densities in the metropolitan area. 

Populations within the Study area are 

also aging, with the percentage of 

people who are 65 years old or older 

expected to grow from about 13% to 

nearly 20% by 2030 in Oklahoma and 

from 10% to over 17% in Texas, with 

the aging population expected to rely 

more heavily on public transportation 

such as intercity rail. Long range 

transportation plans in Texas and 

Oklahoma have identified the need to 

improve passenger rail services to meet 

the future demand brought on by these 

changes in population. 

While a common need exists for 

increased passenger rail service across 

the 850-mile Study corridor, the 

corridor has been divided into three 

sections where the passenger rail needs 

and opportunities within each section, 

while interdependent, are distinct. Each 

section will both be evaluated 

separately by section and as parts of the 

overall rail corridor in the Service Level 

EIS. 

The north section between Oklahoma 

City and Dallas/Fort Worth has existing 

intercity passenger rail service 

(Heartland Flyer) with one train in each 

direction per day, where annual 

ridership has increased by as much as 

10% within the last three years. In this 

section, over 60% of train passengers 

would otherwise have taken private 

vehicles and up to 29% of passengers 

would otherwise have not made the 

journey. This passenger rail service is 

constrained by operation on a busy 

freight railroad line resulting in delays 

and schedules with inconvenient 

layovers for connecting with other rail 

or transit services in Fort Worth. Rail 

improvement planning in this section 

has identified the need for enhanced 

railroad facilities and better 

coordination with other connecting 

passenger rail services to increase the 

attractiveness of rail as a travel mode 

choice. Additional needs in this section 

include direct connection to the City of 

Dallas and the Dallas/Fort Worth airport 

(DFW), improved train control systems 

to increase train speed and allow safe 

operation of increased numbers of 

freight and passenger trains within the 

existing rail corridor, and additional 

roadway/railroad grade separations to 

enhance safety where rail and roadways 

cross. 

The central section between Dallas/ 

Fort Worth and San Antonio via Austin 

has existing intercity passenger rail 

service in the form of the Texas Eagle, 

the southernmost portion of daily 

Amtrak service between Chicago and 

San Antonio. From Fort Worth, there are 

daily connections with the Heartland 

Flyer providing intercity rail service 

north to Oklahoma City. From San 

Antonio, there are connections with the 

Sunset Limited running three times 

weekly east to New Orleans and west to 

Los Angeles. Approximately 23% of 

Amtrak train trips ending in Texas 

originate within the state. 

The central section is characterized by 

the highest level of intercity travel 

demand within the state. This is, in 

part, a result of its linking three of the 

four largest metropolitan areas within 

the state, all of which are projected to 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2013 / Notices 16039 

continue to grow in the future. The 

central section, via existing I–35, is 

characterized by substantially higher 

automobile and truck volumes than any 

other intercity corridor in the state. 

These volumes are projected to increase 

steadily through 2035, by which time 

traffic volumes are projected to result in 

freeway speeds as low as 15 miles per 

hour, contributing to very substantial 

delays. Air travel between the central 

section termini (i.e., Dallas/Fort Worth 

and San Antonio) is characterized by 

higher passenger volumes than any 

other intrastate connection. With the 

exception of the Dallas/Fort Worth-toHouston connection, air travel demand 

between Dallas/Fort Worth and San 

Antonio is more than twice the demand 

of any other intrastate intercity 

connection. Enhanced passenger rail 

service in the central section would 

serve a clear need for additional 

transportation capacity and options. It 

would assist in meeting the strong 

demand for intercity travel in this 

highly populated corridor, thereby 

diverting some of the heavy automobile 

and truck volumes occurring at present 

and projected for the future. 

The southern section between San 

Antonio and the cities of Laredo, Corpus 

Christi, and Brownsville does not have 

passenger rail services. Instead, Amtrak 

provides passenger service south of San 

Antonio by motor coach. The border 

areas of Brownsville and Laredo have 

heavy commercial truck traffic on the 

highways and freight traffic along 

existing freight railroad lines. The 

growing congestion in the border cities 

is affecting the economic viability of the 

region. Other intercity public 

transportation, including transportation 

to other destinations in the U.S. and 

Mexico, is provided by motor coaches 

operated by an assortment of Mexican 

and U.S. operators. A need exists to 

provide travel mode options to address 

future passenger travel demand in this 

area and reduce roadway congestion 

resulting from the passenger buses 

combined with commercial truck traffic. 

Rail service in this section would 

provide an efficient, safe, equitable, and 

affordable alternative to highway, bus, 

or air travel. In this section, cross-border 

travel demand to Mexican destinations 

such as Monterrey, a major business 

hub, results in strong potential 

passenger rail demand. 

III. Scoping and Public Involvement 

FRA encourages broad participation 

in the Service Level EIS process during 

scoping and subsequent review of the 

resulting environmental documents. 

Comments and suggestions are invited 

from all interested agencies and the 

public at large to ensure the full range 

of issues related to the proposed action 

and all reasonable alternatives are 

addressed and all significant issues are 

identified. In particular, FRA is 

interested in determining whether areas 

of environmental concern exist where 

the potential may exist for significant 

impacts identifiable at a corridor level. 

Appropriate Federal, State, and local 

agencies and appropriate railroads are 

being notified of the proposed Project 

and comments are being solicited. 

Public agencies with jurisdiction are 

requested to advise the FRA and TxDOT 

of the applicable permit and 

environmental review requirements of 

each agency and the scope and content 

of the environmental information that is 

germane to the agency’s statutory 

responsibilities in connection with the 

proposed improvements. 

An iterative public involvement/ 

information program will support the 

process. The program will involve 

stakeholder workshops, newsletters, a 

Web site, public open houses, small 

group and community meetings, and 

other methods to solicit and incorporate 

public input throughout the Service 

Level EIS process. To ensure that the 

full range of issues relating to the 

proposed action is addressed, comments 

and suggestions are invited from all 

interested parties. Comments and 

questions concerning the proposed 

action should be directed to TxDOT or 

to the FRA at the addresses provided 

above. Additional information can be 

obtained by visiting the web site at 

www.txokrail.org, or sending an email 

using the link on the Web site. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 7, 

2013. 

Corey Hill, 

Director, Passenger and Freight Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2013–05732 Filed 3–12–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA–2011– 

0169] 

Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping 

Requirements 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), 

Department of Transportation. 

ACTION: Notice and request for comment 

on obtaining vehicle information for the 

general public; Correction. 

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can 

collect certain information from the 

public, it must receive approval from 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice 

announces that the Information 

Collection Request (ICR) abstracted 

below is being forwarded to OMB for 

review and comments. A Federal 

Register notice (77 FR 11621) with a 60- 

day comment period soliciting 

comments on the proposed information 

collection for the agency’s new 

consumer Vehicle-child restraint system 

(CRS) Fit program and consolidation of 

existing collection of vehicle safety 

information (OMB Control Number 

2127–0629) was published on February 

27, 2012. The February 2012 ‘‘Request 

for comments’’ notice described a new 

collection of information for which 

NHTSA intend to seek OMB approval 

concerning recommendations from 

vehicle manufacturers regarding child 

restraint systems (CRSs) that fit in their 

individual vehicles. Furthermore, 

NHTSA planned to combine the new 

information collection with an existing 

collection for obtaining vehicle 

information for consumer information 

purposes. The agency received 

comments from the public on the new 

and existing collection of information. 

However, since the agency has not 

published its final decision on the new 

consumer information program, it is not 

able at this time to address comments 

received from the public regarding the 

new provisions for the collection of 

information on vehicle-CRS matchups 

from vehicle manufacturers. Thus, this 

‘‘Correction’’ notice now focuses on 

renewing the existing collection of 

vehicle safety information and only 

addresses comments received from that 

information collection. Comments 

pertaining to the new Vehicle-CRS Fit 

Program will be addressed at a later 

time in a new submission, when the 

agency publishes its final decision on 

the new program. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 12, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Complete copies of each request for 

collection of information may be 

obtained at no charge from Johanna 

Lowrie, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, NHTSA, Room W43– 

410, 1200 New Jersey Ave SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Lowrie’s 

telephone number is (202) 366–5269. 

Please identify the relevant collection of 

information by referring to its OMB 

Control Number. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SCOPING REPORT 

Appendix B 

Public Scoping Meeting 

Announcements – 

Print Media 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

cover 1Appendix B 

Media Advisory 

News 

125 E. 11th Street 

Austin, Texas 78701-2483 

(512) 463-8700 FAX (512) 463-9896 

TxDOT’s four goals: Maintain a safe system, address congestion, connect Texas communities, and be a Best-in-Class state agency 

--- MEDIA ADVISORY ---

For Immediate Release March 19, 2013 

 

TXDOT SEEKS INPUT FROM RESIDENTS IN WACO, AUSTIN AND BELTON 

ABOUT POSSIBILITY OF TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL 

TxDOT kicks off study with public meetings to research viability of passenger rail line 

WHEN/WHERE: All meetings run from 6 to 8 p.m. 

• March 25 – Waco – Heart of Texas COG, 1514 S. New Road 

• March 27 – Austin – TxDOT Austin District Office, 7901 N. I-35, Bldg. 7 

• April 1 – Belton – Central Texas COG, 2180 N. Main St. 

Background — The federally-funded Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) will 

evaluate existing passenger rail services in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City to south 

Texas as a potential future transportation option that can help reduce demands on the state’s 

roadways, particularly along the highly-congested I-35. These open houses are the first step in a 

very inclusive process aimed at gathering public input for the study. The above open houses are 

three of 12 such meetings taking place in March and April along the corridor. The public may 

view all of the open house locations/dates and provide comments online at www.TXOKrail.org. 

For media inquiries, contact TxDOT Media Relations at MediaRelations@txdot.gov or 

(512) 463-8700. 

### 
News 

125 E. 11th Street 

Austin, Texas 78701-2483 

(512) 463-8700 FAX (512) 463-9896 

TxDOT’s four goals: Maintain a safe system, address congestion, connect Texas communities, and be a Best-in-Class state agency 

--- MEDIA ADVISORY ---

For Immediate Release April 2, 2013 

 

HARLINGEN MEETING LOCATION CHANGED TO ACCOMMODATE MORE 

PUBLIC INPUT ABOUT POSSIBILITY OF TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL 

TxDOT kicks off study with public meetings to research viability of passenger rail line 

WHEN/WHERE: The meeting will run from 6 to 8 p.m. 

• April 4 – Harlingen – Harlingen Town Hall, 118 E. Tyler Ave. 

(previously scheduled at City Hall, 502 E. Tyler Ave.) 

Background — The federally-funded Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) will 

evaluate existing passenger rail services in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City to south 

Texas as a potential future transportation option that can help reduce demands on the state’s 

roadways, particularly along the highly-congested I-35. These open houses are the first step in a 

very inclusive process aimed at gathering public input for the study. The above open houses are 

four of 12 such meetings taking place in March and April along the corridor. The public may view 

all of the open house locations/dates and provide comments online at www.TXOKrail.org. 

For media inquiries, contact TxDOT Media Relations at MediaRelations@txdot.gov or 

(512) 463-8700. 

### 
News 

125 E. 11th Street 

Austin, Texas 78701-2483 

(512) 463-8700 FAX (512) 463-9896 

TxDOT’s four goals: Maintain a safe system, address congestion, connect Texas communities, and be a Best-in-Class state agency 

--- MEDIA ADVISORY ---

For Immediate Release March 19, 2013 

 

TXDOT SEEKS PUBLIC INPUT FROM CORPUS CHRISTI, HARLINGEN, LAREDO, 

SAN ANTONIO ABOUT POSSIBILITY OF TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL 

TxDOT kicks off study with public meetings to research viability of passenger rail line 

WHEN/WHERE: All meetings run from 6 to 8 p.m. 

• April 1 – San Antonio – Windcrest Civic Center, 9310 Jim Seal Dr. 

• April 2 – Corpus Christi – TxDOT Offices, 1701 S. Padre Island Dr. 

• April 3 – Laredo – TxDOT Offices, 1817 Bob Bullock Ave. 

• April 4 – Harlingen – Harlingen City Hall, 502 E. Tyler Ave. 

Background — The federally-funded Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) will 

evaluate existing passenger rail services in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City to south 

Texas as a potential future transportation option that can help reduce demands on the state’s 

roadways, particularly along the highly-congested I-35. These open houses are the first step in a 

very inclusive process aimed at gathering public input for the study. The above open houses are 

four of 12 such meetings taking place in March and April along the corridor. The public may view 

all of the open house locations/dates and provide comments online at www.TXOKrail.org. 

For media inquiries, contact TxDOT Media Relations at MediaRelations@txdot.gov or 

(512) 463-8700. 

### 
News 

125 E. 11th Street 

Austin, Texas 78701-2483 

(512) 463-8700 FAX (512) 463-9896 

TxDOT’s four goals: Maintain a safe system, address congestion, connect Texas communities, and be a Best-in-Class state agency 

--- MEDIA ADVISORY ---

For Immediate Release March 19, 2013 

 

TXDOT SEEKS INPUT FROM RESIDENTS IN ARDMORE AND OKLAHOMA CITY 

ABOUT POSSIBILITY OF TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL 

TxDOT kicks off study with public meetings to research viability of passenger rail line 

WHEN/WHERE: All meetings run from 6 to 8 p.m. 

• March 25 – Oklahoma City – Metro Tech Center, 1900 Springlake Dr. 

• March 26 – Ardmore – Ardmore Train Station, 251 E. Main St. 

Background — The federally-funded Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) will 

evaluate existing passenger rail services in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City to south 

Texas as a potential future transportation option that can help reduce demands on the state’s 

roadways, particularly along the highly-congested I-35. These open houses are the first step in a 

very inclusive process aimed at gathering public input for the study. The above open houses are 

two of 12 such meetings taking place in March and April along the corridor. The public may view 

all of the open house locations/dates and provide comments online at www.TXOKrail.org. 

For media inquiries, contact TxDOT Media Relations at MediaRelations@txdot.gov or 

(512) 463-8700. 

### 
News 

125 E. 11th Street 

Austin, Texas 78701-2483 

(512) 463-8700 FAX (512) 463-9896 

TxDOT’s four goals: Maintain a safe system, address congestion, connect Texas communities, and be a Best-in-Class state agency 

--- MEDIA ADVISORY ---

For Immediate Release March 19, 2013 

 

TXDOT SEEKS INPUT FROM RESIDENTS IN DALLAS, FORT WORTH AND 

SHERMAN ABOUT POSSIBILITY OF TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL 

TxDOT kicks off study with public meetings to research viability of passenger rail line 

WHEN/WHERE: All meetings run from 6 to 8 p.m. 

• March 28 – Fort Worth – TxDOT Training Offices, 2501 S.W. Loop 820 

• April 2 – Sherman – Sherman Senior Center, 1500 N. Broughton St. 

• April 3 – Dallas – DFW Minority Supplier Development Council (MSDC) 

Offices, 8828 N. Stemmons Fwy., Ste. 550 

Background — The federally-funded Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) will 

evaluate existing passenger rail services in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City to south 

Texas as a potential future transportation option that can help reduce demands on the state’s 

roadways, particularly along the highly-congested I-35. These north Texas open houses are the 

first step in a very inclusive process aimed at gathering public input for the study. The north Texas 

open houses are three of 12 such meetings taking place in March and April along the corridor. 

The public may view all of the open house locations/dates and provide comments online at 

www.TXOKrail.org. 

For media inquiries, contact TxDOT Media Relations at MediaRelations@txdot.gov or 

(512) 463-8700. 

### 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

cover 1Appendix B 

Scoping Ad 

WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail service 

opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will conclude 

with a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied 

in the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are 

reƋuested to contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate 

arrangements can ďe made. ͻ >ĂƐƉĞƌƐŽŶĂƐĐŽŶĚŝƐĐĂƉĂĐŝĚĂĚĞƐƋƵĞĞƐƚĠŶƉĞŶƐĂŶĚŽĞŶĂƐŝƐƟƌĂĞƐƚĂƌĞƵŶŝsŶ

y que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-

51ϯϳ͕ por lo ŵenos tres dşas antes de la reunisn͕ para poder Śacer los arreglos necesarios͘

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

^ŚĞƌŵĂŶ͕dy

Tues.͕ pr. Ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

Sherman Senior enter

ϭρϬϬ E roughton St.

KŬůĂŚŽŵĂŝƚLJ͕K<

Don.͕ Dar. Ϯρ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

Detro Tech enter

ϭεϬϬ Springlake r.

ƌĚŵŽƌĞ͕K<

Tues.͕ Dar. Ϯς͕ ς - Θ p.m.

rdmore Train StaƟ on

Ϯρϭ E. Dain St.

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail 

service opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will 

conclude with a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe 

studied in the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are 

reƋuested to contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate 

arrangements can ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunisn y 

que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-51ϯϳ͕

por lo ŵenos tres dşas antes de la reunisn͕ para poder Śacer los arreglos necesarios͘

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

ĞůƚŽŶ͕dy

Don.͕ pr. ϭ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

entral Texas O'

ϮϭΘϬ E. Dain St.

ƵƐƟŶ͕dy

ted.͕ Dar. Ϯϳ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT usƟ n Oĸ ce

ϳεϬϭ E. I,-ϯρ͕ ldg. ϳ

^ĂŶŶƚŽŶŝŽ͕dy

Don.͕ pr. ϭ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

tindcrest ivic enter

εϯϭϬ :im Seal r.͕ tindcrest͕ Ty

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail service 

opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will conclude 

with a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied 

in the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are 

reƋuested to contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate 

arrangements can ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunisn y 

que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-51ϯϳ͕

por lo ŵenos tres dşas antes de la reunisn͕ para poder Śacer los arreglos necesarios͘

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

ŽƌƉƵƐŚƌŝƐƟ͕dy

Tues.͕ pr. Ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT Oĸ ces

ϭϳϬϭ S. Padre Island r.

>ĂƌĞĚŽ͕dy

ted.͕ pr. ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT Oĸ ces

ϭΘϭϳ oď ullock ve.

^ĂŶŶƚŽŶŝŽ͕dy

Don.͕ pr. ϭ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

tindcrest ivic enter

εϯϭϬ :im Seal r.͕

tindcrest͕ Ty

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail service 

opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will conclude with a 

service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad dministraƟ on 

(&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied in the service-level 

EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are reƋuested to 

contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate arrangements can 

ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunisn y que necesiten servicios o 

ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-51ϯϳ͕ por lo ŵenos tres dşas antes de 

la reunisn͕ para poder Śacer los arreglos necesarios͘

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

&ŽƌƚtŽƌƚŚ͕dy

Thurs.͕ Dar. ϮΘ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT Training Oĸ ces

ϮρϬϭ S.t. >oop ΘϮϬ

ĂůůĂƐ͕dy

ted.͕ pr. ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

&t DS Oĸ ces

ΘΘϮΘ E. Stemmons &wy͕ Suite ρρϬ

tĂĐŽ͕dy

Don.͕ Dar. Ϯρ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

,eart of Texas O'

ϭρϭκ S. Eew Rd.

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail 

service opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will 

conclude with a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied 

in the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services 

are reƋuested to contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that 

appropriate arrangements can ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a 

esta reunión y que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner 

al (512) 486-5137, por lo menos tres días antes de la reunión, para poder hacer los arreglos necesarios.

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

&ŽƌƚtŽƌƚŚ͕dy

Thurs.͕ Dar. ϮΘ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT Training Oĸ ces

ϮρϬϭ S.t. >oop ΘϮϬ

ĂůůĂƐ͕dy

ted.͕ pr. ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

&t DS Oĸ ces

ΘΘϮΘ E. Stemmons &wy.͕ Suite ρρϬ

tĂĐŽ͕dy

Don.͕ Dar. Ϯρ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

,eart of Texas O'

ϭρϭκ S. Eew Rd.

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail 

service opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will 

conclude with a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied 

in the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are 

reƋuested to contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate 

arrangements can ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunión y 

que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-5137, 

por lo menos tres días antes de la reunión, para poder hacer los arreglos necesarios.

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

ŽƌƉƵƐŚƌŝƐƟ͕dy

Tues.͕ pr. Ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT Oĸ ces

ϭϳϬϭ S. Padre Island r.

>ĂƌĞĚŽ͕dy

ted.͕ pr. ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT Oĸ ces

ϭΘϭϳ oď ullock ve.

,ĂƌůŝŶŐĞŶ͕dy

Thurs.͕ pr. κ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

,arlingen ity ,all

ρϬϮ E. Tyler ve.

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail service 

opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will conclude with a 

service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied in 

the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are reƋuested to 

contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate arrangements can 

ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunión y que necesiten servicios o 

ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-5137, por lo menos tres días antes de 

la reunión, para poder hacer los arreglos necesarios.

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

ĞůƚŽŶ͕dy

Don.͕ pr. ϭ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

entral Texas O'

ϮϭΘϬ E. Dain St.

ƵƐƟŶ͕dy

ted.͕ Dar. Ϯϳ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT usƟ n Oĸ ce

ϳεϬϭ E. I,-ϯρ͕ ldg. ϳ

tĂĐŽ͕dy

Don.͕ Dar. Ϯρ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

,eart of Texas O'

ϭρϭκ S. Eew Rd.

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail service 

opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will conclude with a 

service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied in 

the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are reƋuested to 

contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate arrangements can 

ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunión y que necesiten servicios o 

ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-5137, por lo menos tres días antes de 

la reunión, para poder hacer los arreglos necesarios.

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

ŽƌƉƵƐŚƌŝƐƟ͕dy

Tues.͕ pr. Ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT Oĸ ces

ϭϳϬϭ S. Padre Island r.

>ĂƌĞĚŽ͕dy

ted.͕ pr. ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT Oĸ ces

ϭΘϭϳ oď ullock ve.

,ĂƌůŝŶŐĞŶ͕dy

Thurs.͕ pr. κ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

,arlingen ity ,all

ρϬϮ E. Tyler ve.

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail service 

opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will conclude 

with a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied 

in the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are 

reƋuested to contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate 

arrangements can ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunión 

y que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-

5137, por lo menos tres días antes de la reunión, para poder hacer los arreglos necesarios.

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

^ŚĞƌŵĂŶ͕dy

Tues.͕ pr. Ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

Sherman Senior enter

ϭρϬϬ E roughton St.

KŬůĂŚŽŵĂŝƚLJ͕K<

Don.͕ Dar. Ϯρ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

Detro Tech enter

ϭεϬϬ Springlake r.

ƌĚŵŽƌĞ͕K<

Tues.͕ Dar. Ϯς͕ ς - Θ p.m.

rdmore Train StaƟ on

Ϯρϭ E. Dain St.

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail 

service opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will 

conclude with a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied 

in the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are 

reƋuested to contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate 

arrangements can ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunión y 

que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-5137, 

por lo menos tres días antes de la reunión, para poder hacer los arreglos necesarios.

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

ŽƌƉƵƐŚƌŝƐƟ͕dy

Tues.͕ pr. Ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT Oĸ ces

ϭϳϬϭ S. Padre Island r.

ƵƐƟŶ͕dy

ted.͕ Dar. Ϯϳ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

TxOT usƟ n Oĸ ce

ϳεϬϭ E. I,-ϯρ͕ ldg. ϳ

^ĂŶŶƚŽŶŝŽ͕dy

Don.͕ pr. ϭ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

tindcrest ivic enter

εϯϭϬ :im Seal r.͕ tindcrest͕ Ty

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail service 

opƟ ons in an ΘρϬ-mile corridor from Oklahoma ity to south Texas and will conclude with 

a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied 

in the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ ϮϬϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are 

reƋuested to contact Dark terner at (ρϭϮ) κΘς-ρϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate 

arrangements can ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunión y que 

necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-5137, por lo 

menos tres días antes de la reunión, para poder hacer los arreglos necesarios.

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

^ŚĞƌŵĂŶ͕dy

Tues.͕ pr. Ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

Sherman Senior enter

ϭρϬϬ E roughton St.

ĂůůĂƐ͕dy

ted.͕ pr. ϯ͕ ς - Θ p.m.

&t DS Oĸ ces

ΘΘϮΘ E. Stemmons &wy͕ Suite ρρϬ

ƌĚŵŽƌĞ͕K<

Tues.͕ Dar. Ϯς͕ ς - Θ p.m.

rdmore Train StaƟ on

Ϯρϭ E. Dain St.

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮρ E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳΘϳϬϭ-ϮκΘϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail service opƟ ons 

in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City to south Texas and will conclude with a servicelevel environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad dministraƟ on 

(&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied in the service-level 

EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ Ϯ0ϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are reƋuested to contact 

Dark terner at (5ϭϮ) κ8ς-5ϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate arrangements can ďe made. ͻ 

>as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunión y que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le 

pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-5137, por lo menos tres días antes de la reunión, para poder 

hacer los arreglos necesarios.

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

ĞůƚŽŶ͕dy

Don.͕ pr. ϭ͕ ς - 8 p.m.

Central Texas COG

Ϯϭ80 E. Dain St.

ƵƐƟŶ͕dy

ted.͕ Dar. Ϯϳ͕ ς - 8 p.m.

TxOT usƟ n Oĸ ce

ϳε0ϭ E. I,-ϯ5͕ ldg. ϳ

tĂĐŽ͕dy

Don.͕ Dar. Ϯ5͕ ς - 8 p.m.

,eart of Texas COG

ϭ5ϭκ S. Eew Rd.

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮ5 E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳ8ϳ0ϭ-Ϯκ8ϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƐĐŽƉŝŶŐƚŚĞdĞdžĂƐͲKŬůĂŚŽŵĂWĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌZĂŝů^ƚƵĚLJ

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail service 

opƟ ons in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City to south Texas and will conclude 

with a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

The Į rst step in the EIS process is scoping͖ when TxOT and the &ederal Railroad 

dministraƟ on (&R) will invite the puďlic to provide input aďout what should ďe studied in 

the service-level EIS. The puďlic scoping comment period ends on pril Ϯς͕ Ϯ0ϭϯ.

Persons with disaďiliƟ es who plan to aƩ end this meeƟ ng and who may need auxiliary aides or services are 

reƋuested to contact Dark terner at (5ϭϮ) κ8ς-5ϭϯϳ at least three days prior to the meeƟ ng so that appropriate 

arrangements can ďe made. ͻ >as personas con discapacidades que estĠn pensando en asisƟ r a esta reunión y 

que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-5137, 

por lo menos tres días antes de la reunión, para poder hacer los arreglos necesarios.

in coordinaƟ on with Oklahoma OT

ĞůƚŽŶ͕dy

Don.͕ pr. ϭ͕ ς - 8 p.m.

Central Texas COG

Ϯϭ80 E .Dain St.

ĂůůĂƐ͕dy

ted.͕ pr. ϯ͕ ς - 8 p.m.

&t DSC Oĸ ces

88Ϯ8 E. Stemmons &wy͕ Suite 550

tĂĐŽ͕dy

Don.͕ Dar. Ϯ5͕ ς - 8 p.m.

,eart of Texas COG

ϭ5ϭκ S. Eew Rd.

dŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽƉŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗

hƉĐŽŵŝŶŐƐĐŽƉŝŶŐŵĞĞƟŶŐƐŝŶLJŽƵƌĂƌĞĂ͗

sŝƐŝƚwww.TXOKrail.orgƚŽůĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞ͘

ͻ Dail to͗ Dark terner͕ Rail ivision͕ TxOT͕

 ϭϮ5 E. ϭϭth Street͕ usƟ n͕ Ty ϳ8ϳ0ϭ-Ϯκ8ϯ

ͻ Suďmit comments online at www.TyO<rail.org

ͻ Ʃ end a scoping meeƟ ng (see weďsite for all ϭϮ locaƟ ons)

SCOPING REPORT 

Appendix C 

Public Scoping Meeting 

Announcements – 

Electronic Notification 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

cover 1Appendix B 

emails 

1

Staley, Jennifer/PDX

From: TXOKRAIL [TXOKRAIL@txdot.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:12 AM

Subject: 12 upcoming Tx-Ok Passenger Rail Study Open Houses – spread the word!

Attachments: TOPRS Newsletter 3.12.13-DIGITAL.pdf; TOPRS Poster - 3.7.13.pdf

Importance: High

We are excited to invite you to a series of 12 scoping open houses that will be held the last week of March and 

first week of April for the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS). As you may know, the study will 

evaluate a range of passenger rail service options in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma city to south Texas, 

concluding in a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS).

We would like to get your help in advertising the study and the 12 public scoping meetings, as well as the 

public scoping period which ends on April 26, 2013.

We would appreciate it if you could do one or more of the following:

• Email the newsletter (attached) to your existing list of stakeholders/interested parties

• Print and hang up the poster (attached) in your office or other public locations

• Share the newsletter and/or poster with any other local organizations/groups that you think would be 

interested in the project (schools, social service providers, etc.

If you have any questions or would like to submit a comment either visit the project website at TXOKrail.org 

or contact Mark Werner by phone (512) 486-5137 or by post (Mark Werner, Rail Division, TxDOT/125 E. 11th

Street/Austin, TX 78701-2483).

Be Safe. Drive Smart 
1

Staley, Jennifer/PDX

From: TXOKRAIL [TXOKRAIL@txdot.gov]

Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 2:52 PM

Subject: Tx-Ok Passenger Rail Study open houses start tonight

Attachments: TOPRS Poster - 3.7.13.pdf

Importance: High

We know your time is too valuable to sit in traffic. That's why we need to hear from you about potential passenger 

rail in the IH-35 corridor. Come to an open house to tell us what you think. 

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will be hosting 12 open houses from Oklahoma City to south Texas, starting 

with meetings tonight in Waco and Oklahoma City (3/25 from 6:00 to 8:00 pm). Check out the attached poster for all of 

the dates and locations. 

Help spread the word - tell your friends, neighbors, and co-workers! Can't make one of the 12 open houses over the next 

two weeks? Send us your comments online or read more about the study at www.TxOkRail.org 

You are receiving this email because you or your organization has expressed interest in the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study. If you would like to be 

removed from the mailing list, please reply to this email. 

Be Safe. Drive Smart 
1

Staley, Jennifer/PDX

From: TXOKRAIL [TXOKRAIL@txdot.gov]

Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 4:55 PM

Subject: Tx-OK Passenger Rail Study Open Houses start Monday 3/25

Attachments: TOPRS Poster - 3.7.13.pdf

Importance: High

Don't forget - Open houses start next Monday!

These public “Scoping Open Houses” are the first step in a very inclusive, open process seeking public input 

about what should be evaluated in the service-level environmental impact study (EIS). There are 12 open 

houses taking place in March and April along the corridor. 

Waco - March 25 – Heart of Texas COG – 1514 S. New Rd., 6:00 – 8:00 pm

Austin - March 27 – TxDOT Austin Office – 7901 N. IH-35, Bldg. 7, 6:00 - 8:00 pm

Fort Worth – March 28 – TxDOT Training Offices – 2501 S.W. Loop 820, 6:00 – 8:00 pm

Belton - April 1 – Central Texas COG, 2180 N. Main St., 6:00 – 8:00 pm

Sherman – April 2 – Sherman Senior Center, 1500 N. Broughton St., 6:00 – 8:00 pm

Dallas – April 3 – DFW MSDC Offices – 8828 N. Stemmons Fwy., Ste. 550, 6:00 - 8:00 pm 

View all of the open house locations/dates and provide comments online at www.TXOKrail.org. 

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) is a federally funded, TxDOT managed (in coordination with the 

Oklahoma DOT) study evaluating existing passenger rail services in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City to south 

Texas as a potential future transportation option to reduce demands on the state’s roadways, particularly the already 

congested IH-35 corridor. 

Be Safe. Drive Smart 
1

Staley, Jennifer/PDX

From: TXOKRAIL [TXOKRAIL@txdot.gov]

Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:05 PM

Subject: Tx-Ok Passenger Rail Study Open Houses in south Texas 4/1-4/4

Attachments: TOPRS Poster - 3.7.13.pdf

Importance: High

Don't forget - Open houses start next Monday and come to south Texas April 1-4!

These public “Scoping Open Houses” are the first step in a very inclusive, open process seeking public input 

about what should be evaluated in the service-level environmental impact study (EIS). There are 12 open 

houses taking place in March and April along the corridor. 

San Antonio - April 1 – Windcrest Civic Center – 9310 Jim Seal Dr., 6:00 – 8:00 pm

Corpus Christi - April 2 – TxDOT Offices - 1701 S. Padre Island Dr., 6:00 – 8:00 pm

Laredo - April 3 – TxDOT Offices – 1817 Bob Bullock Ave., 6:00 - 8:00 pm 

Harlingen - April 4 – Harlingen City Hall – 502 E. Tyler Ave., 6:00 – 8:00 pm 

View all of the open house locations/dates and provide comments online at www.TXOKrail.org. 

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) is a federally funded, TxDOT managed (in coordination with the 

Oklahoma DOT) study evaluating existing passenger rail services in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City to south 

Texas as a potential future transportation option to reduce demands on the state’s roadways, particularly the already 

congested IH-35 corridor. 

Be Safe. Drive Smart 
1

Staley, Jennifer/PDX

From: TXOKRAIL [TXOKRAIL@txdot.gov]

Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:10 AM

Subject: Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study – Invitation to Agency Scoping Meetings

Agency Scoping Meeting Participants:

The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Rail Division is conducting a study to evaluate a 

range of passenger rail service development options in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City to 

south Texas, generally along Interstate 35. The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) will 

consider the corridor as a whole, as well as within three sections:

• Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth 

• Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio 

• San Antonio to south Texas (Corpus Christi, Brownsville, and Laredo) 

As part of the study, a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS) will be prepared in 

accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), with the Federal Railroad 

Administration (FRA) as the lead agency. At the completion of the study, a service development plan 

will be prepared to guide further investment and development of passenger rail within the corridor. 

Agency and public scoping for the service-level EIS will run through April 26, 2013 (see 

the attached Notice of Intent for more information).

TxDOT will convene Agency Scoping Meetings at the following locations, followed the same day by 

public scoping open houses (6:00 to 8:00 pm):

Monday, March 25, 2013

2:00 to 4:00 pm

Metro Tech Center

1900 Springlake Drive

Oklahoma City, OK

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

2:00 to 4:00 pm

TxDOT Austin District Office

7901 N IH-35, Building 7
2

Austin, TX

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

2:00 to 4:00 pm

Dallas/Fort Worth Minority Supplier Development Council offices

8828 N. Stemmons Fwy., Suite 550

Dallas, TX

We look forward to seeing you at the meeting. Please RSVP to Mark 

Werner at mark.werner@txdot.gov and include any questions you might have. Formal comments 

should be mailed to the location below, via the website (www.TXOKrail.org), or submitted at one of 

the Scoping Meetings.

Mailed comments can be sent to: 

Attn: TOPRS Scoping Comments

TxDOT - RRD 

125 E. 11th St.

Austin, TX 78701

Be Safe. Drive Smart 
 The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) will evaluate a range

 of passenger rail service opti ons in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City

 to south Texas and will conclude with a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

 The fi rst step in the EIS process is scoping; when the Texas Department of Transportati on 

(TxDOT) and the Federal Railroad Administrati on (FRA) will invite the public to provide 

input about what should be studied in the service-level EIS. The public scoping comment 

period ends on April 26, 2013.

• Mail to: Mark Werner, Rail Division, TxDOT, 125 E. 11th Street, Austi n, TX 78701-2483

• Submit comments at www.TXOKrail.org

• Att end one of the scoping meeti ngs listed below

in coordinati on with Oklahoma DOT

To provide scoping comments:

Visit www.TXOKrail.org to learn more.

Public Open House Schedule

Want more informati on on the project? Feel free to join us at any of the 

following 12 public open houses. 

Participate in scoping the

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study

Ardmore, OK

Tuesday, March 26

6 - 8 p.m.

Ardmore Train Station

251 E. Main Street

Belton, TX 

Monday, April 1

6 - 8 p.m.

Central Texas COG

2180 N. Main St.

Austin, TX

Wednesday, March 27

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Austin Offi ce

7901 N. IH-35, Bldg. 7

Sherman, TX

Tuesday, April 2

6 - 8 p.m.

Sherman Senior Center

1500 N. Broughton St.

Waco, TX

Monday, March 25

6 - 8 p.m.

Heart of Texas COG

1514 S. New Rd.

San Antonio, TX

Monday, April 1 

6 - 8 p.m.

Windcrest Civic Center

9310 Jim Seal Dr., 

Windcrest, TX

Dallas, TX

Wednesday, April 3

6 - 8 p.m.

DFW MSDC Offi ces

8828 N. Stemmons Fwy, 

Suite 550

Harlingen, TX

Thursday, April 4

6 - 8 p.m.

Harlingen City Hall

502 E. Tyler Ave.

Corpus Christi, TX

Tuesday, April 2

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Offi ces

1701 S. Padre Island Dr.

Oklahoma City, OK

Monday, March 25

6 - 8 p.m.

Metro Tech Center

1900 Springlake Drive

Fort Worth, TX

Thursday, March 28

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Training Offi ces

2501 S.W. Loop 820

Laredo, TX

Wednesday, April 3

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Offi ces

1817 Bob Bullock Ave.

Las personas con discapacidades que estén pensando en asisti r a esta reunión y que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le 

pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-5137, por lo menos tres días antes de la reunión, para poder 

hacer los arreglos necesarios.

Persons with disabiliti es who plan to att end this meeti ng and who may 

need auxiliary aides or services are requested to contact Mark Werner at 

(512) 486-5137 at least three days prior to the meeti ng so that appropriate 

arrangements can be made.
Newsletter

in coordinati on with Oklahoma DOT

TxDOT launches study of passenger 

rail from Oklahoma City to South Texas

 Texas’ populati on and economy are booming, 

with much of its growth occurring in the alreadycongested IH-35 corridor. While the Texas 

Department of Transportati on (TxDOT) conti nues 

to look at roadway improvements to keep all of us 

and our economy moving, other opti ons, such as 

passenger rail service, fi t the needs of many travelers 

and would reduce demand on the state’s roadways. 

Through the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study 

(TOPRS), TxDOT will consider how passenger rail 

service could fi t into this corridor. 

 TOPRS will evaluate a range of passenger rail 

service opti ons in an 850-mile corridor from 

Oklahoma City to south Texas and will conclude with 

a service-level environmental impact statement 

(EIS). The study will consider the corridor as a whole, 

as well as within three segments: 

 • Oklahoma City to Dallas/Fort Worth

 • Dallas/Fort Worth to San Antonio

 • San Antonio to Rio Grande Valley / Corpus 

 Christi / Laredo

 Because the corridor extends north of the Red 

River to Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Department of 

Transportati on (ODOT) is an important partner in the 

study. In additi on, transit service providers, railroads, 

metropolitan planning organizati ons (MPOs), and 

citi es and counti es, as well as community members, 

will be engaged throughout the study. 

Map of the TOPRS corridor.

Volume 1, Issue 1 March 2013

Para leer este boletí n informati vo en 

español, consulte la página 3.

1
What is scoping?

 During scoping, the first step in the EIS process, 

TxDOT and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 

will invite the public to provide input about what should 

be studied in the service-level EIS. 

 During the scoping period, TxDOT will accept public 

comments in writing, through the TOPRS website, 

and at public meetings held throughout the 

corridor. After the public scoping period ends 

on April 26, 2013, TxDOT will compile all 

comments received and determine 

the scope of the EIS.

The interior of a passenger rail line off ers amenities for 

commuters.

Get involved

 We want to hear from you during the Texas-Oklahoma 

Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS). There will be many ways to get 

involved with the study, ranging from att ending open houses 

or meeti ngs, reviewing writt en informati on, or reviewing 

informati on and providing input through the project website. 

 A series of 12 open houses will take place in March and April 

2013 throughout the corridor. Each meeti ng will contain a brief 

presentati on of the project and its objecti ves, displays to show 

the areas impacted and staff to answer questi ons.

 If you are unable to att end a meeti ng, feel free to join in on 

an online meeti ng at www.TXOKrail.org.

Ready to submit your 

comments?

Please submit your comments through April 26, 2013. 

Comments received by this date will be included in the 

scoping summary report.

ATTEND A MEETING:

Comments can be submitt ed verbally or in writi ng at any 

of the 12 public meeti ngs listed on Page 5.

ONLINE:

Submit your comment online by going to

 www.TXOKrail.org.

MAIL:

Comments can be mailed directly to

Mark Werner, Rail Division

Texas Department of Transportati on

125 E. 11th St.

 Austi n, TX 78701-2483

More about TOPRS

 The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) is 

expected to be completed in 24 months. It will document 

the costs, benefi ts, and impacts of rail service alternati ves 

compared to a no-build alternati ve in a service-level 

environmental impact statement (EIS). 

 The EIS, a federally required document that complies with 

the Nati onal Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), will provide a 

high-level review of rail needs and potenti al service opti ons 

in the corridor. The study could conclude with a decision to 

advance individual projects for more detailed study or a 

decision against making further investments in passenger rail 

in the corridor. 

 Before any identi fi ed project could be constructed, the 

Texas Department of Transportati on (TxDOT) would need to 

complete additi onal environmental review and identi fy funding.

2

Contact Us

Feel free to contact us with any comments or questi ons.

(512) 486-5137 

www.TXOKrail.org
Boletín

TxDOT lanza un estudio sobre trenes de 

pasajeros desde Oklahoma City al Sur de Texas

 Tanto la población como la economía de Texas se 

encuentran en pleno auge, con una gran parte de este 

crecimiento ocurriendo en el ya congesti onado corredor 

IH-35. Mientras que el Departamento de Transporte 

del estado de Texas (TxDOT; por sus siglas en inglés), 

conti nua realizando mejorías en las vías de transporte 

para mantenernos a nosotros y a nuestra economía en 

movimiento, existen otras opciones, como el servicio 

de tren de pasajeros, que cumplen muy bien con las 

necesidades de muchos viajeros y reducirían la demanda 

sobre las carreteras y autopistas del estado. A través del 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) (Estudio 

de trenes de pasajeros entre Texas y Oklahoma), TxDOT 

evaluará la forma en la que el servicio de tren de 

pasajeros podría incluirse en este corredor. 

 TOPRS evaluará un rango de servicios de tren de 

pasajeros dentro de un corredor de 850 millas desde 

Oklahoma City hasta el Sur de Texas y concluirá con 

una declaración sobre el impacto ambiental al nivel 

del servicio (EIS; por sus siglas en inglés). El estudio 

considerará el corredor como una unidad entera y 

también separada en tres segmentos:

 • De Oklahoma City a Dallas/Fort Worth

 • De Dallas/Fort Worth a San Antonio

 • De San Antonio a Rio Grande Valley / Corpus

 Christi / Laredo 

 Debido a que el corredor se exti ende más al norte 

de Red River hasta Oklahoma, el Departamento de 

Transporte del Estado de Oklahoma (ODOT; por sus siglas 

en inglés) es un socio importante en este estudio. Además, 

Mapa del corredor TOPRS.

proveedores de servicios de tránsito, ferrocarriles y 

organizaciones de planeación metropolitana (MPOs; por 

sus siglas en ingles) y ciudades y condados, así como 

miembros de la comunidad, parti ciparán a lo largo del 

estudio. en el estudio. 

3

Volumen 1, Número 1 Marzo 2013

en coordinación con los Oklahoma DOT
¿Qué es el estudio de 

evaluación?

Durante el estudio de evaluación, el primer paso el en el 

proceso EIS, TxDOT y la Administración Federal de Ferrocarriles 

(FRA; por sus siglas en inglés) invitarán al público a dar su 

opinión acerca de lo que se debe estudiar en el EIS a nivel de 

servicio. 

 Durante el periodo de evaluación, TxDOT aceptará 

comentarios por escrito del público a través del siti o web de 

TOPRS, y en reuniones abiertas al público que se llevarán 

a cabo a lo largo del corredor. Después del periodo 

de evaluación inicial que termina el 26 de Abril del 

2013, TxDOT juntará todos los comentarios 

recibidos y determinará el alcance 

del EIS.

El interior de un tren de pasajeros que ofrece 

comodidades para los viajeros.

Participe

 Queremos saber su opinión durante el Estudio de Trenes de 

Pasajeros Texas-Oklahoma. Habrá muchas formas de parti cipar 

en el estudio, desde jornadas de puertas abiertas o reuniones, 

revisar información por escrito, o revisar información y brindar 

contribuciones a través de la página web del proyecto. 

 Una serie de 12 jornadas de puertas abiertas se llevará a 

cabo en Marzo y Abril del 2013 a lo largo del corredor. Cada 

reunión incluirá una breve presentación del proyecto y de 

sus objeti vos, exhibiciones para mostrar las áreas afectadas y 

personal para responder preguntas. 

 Si no le es posible asisti r a una reunión, le invitamos a 

que parti cipe en una de nuestras reuniones en línea en 

www.TXOKrail.org.

Más acerca de TOPRS

 Se esti ma que el Estudio de Trenes de Pasajeros TexasOklahoma (TOPRS) se completará en 24 meses. El estudio 

documentará los costos, benefi cios e impactos de las 

alternati vas de trenes de pasajeros en comparación con una 

alternati va que no requiere construcción por medio de una 

declaración de impacto ambiental al nivel de servicio (EIS). 

 El EIS, un documento requerido por el gobierno federal que 

cumple con la Ley Nacional de Políti ca Ambiental (NEPA; por 

sus siglas en inglés), proporcionará una revisión de alto nivel 

de las necesidades de ferrocarriles y de las posibles opciones 

de servicio en el corredor. El estudio podría concluir con una 

conclusión de avanzar proyectos individuales para un estudio 

más detallado o con una decisión en contra de realizar más 

inversiones en trenes de pasajeros en el corredor. 

 Antes de poder construir cualquier proyecto identi fi cado, 

el Departamento de Transporte de Texas (TxDOT) necesitará 

llevar a cabo más revisiones ambientales y determinar la 

fuente de fi nanciamiento. 

¿Listo para presentar 

sus comentarios?

Por favor presente sus comentarios antes del 26 de abril 

del 2013. Todos los comentarios que se reciban antes de 

esta fecha serán incluidos en el resumen del informe de 

evaluación inicial.

ASISTIR A UNA REUNIÓN:

Los comentarios pueden presentarse o bien verbalmente 

o por escrito en cualquiera de la 12 reuniones públicas 

detalladas en la página 5. 

EN LÍNEA:

Presente su comentario en línea en www.TXOKrail.org.

POR CORREO:

Los comentarios se pueden enviar directamente por 

correo a la siguiente dirección: 

Mark Werner, Rail Division

Texas Department of Transportati on

125 E. 11th St.

 Austi n, TX 78701-2483

4

Contáctenos

Le invitamos a que se ponga en contacto con nosotros 

para cualquier comentario o pregunta que tenga.

(512) 486-5137

www.TXOKrail.org
5

Public Meeting Schedule

Programa de Reuniones Públicas

Oklahoma City, OK

Monday, March 25

6 - 8 p.m.

Metro Tech Center

1900 Springlake Dr.

Ardmore, OK

Tuesday, March 26

6 - 8 p.m.

Ardmore Train Station

251 E. Main St.

Sherman, TX

Tuesday, April 2

6 - 8 p.m.

Sherman Senior Center

1500 N. Broughton St.

Fort Worth, TX

Thursday, March 28

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Training Offi ces

2501 S.W. Loop 820

Dallas, TX

Wednesday, April 3

6 - 8 p.m.

DFW MSDC Offi ces

8828 N. Stemmons Fwy., 

Suite 550

Belton, TX 

Monday, April 1

6 - 8 p.m.

Central Texas COG

2180 N. Main St.

Waco, TX

Monday, March 25

6 - 8 p.m.

Heart of Texas COG

1514 S. New Rd.

Austin, TX

Wednesday, March 27

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Austin Offi ce

7901 N. IH-35, Bldg. 7

San Antonio, TX

Monday, April 1 

6 - 8 p.m.

Windcrest Civic Center

9310 Jim Seal Dr., 

Windcrest, TX

Harlingen, TX

Thursday, April 4

6 - 8 p.m.

Harlingen City Hall

502 E. Tyler Ave.

Corpus Christi, TX

Tuesday, April 2

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Offi ces

1701 S. Padre Island Dr.

Laredo, TX

Wednesday, April 3

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Offi ces

1817 Bob Bullock Ave.

Want more informati on on the project? Feel free to join us at any of the following 12 public meeti ngs 

throughout Oklahoma and Texas. All meeti ng locati ons are ADA accessible. Any special requests must be 

made 3 days in advance.

¿Desea obtener más información acerca del proyecto? Le invitamos a que nos acompañe en cualquiera de las 

12 reuniones públicas en Oklahoma y Texas que se indican a conti nuación. Todas las instalaciones donde se 

llevarán a cabo las reuniones son accesibles para personas con discapacidades. Solicitudes especiales deben 

realizarse con al menos 3 días de anti cipación. 

Existing rail lines in Austin, McGregor and Waco, Texas. (left to right)

Líneas actuales de ferrocarril en Austin, McGregor y Waco, Texas (de izquierda a derecha)
Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

cover 1Appendix B 

website 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study 

Home > Inside TxDOT > Projects > Studies > Statewide

Texas’ population and economy are booming, with much of its 

growth occurring in the already-congested I-35 corridor. While 

TxDOT continues to explore roadway improvements to keep all of 

us and our economy moving, other options, such as passenger rail service, fit the needs of many travelers and 

would reduce demand on the state’s roadways. Through the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study, TxDOT 

will consider how passenger rail service could fit into this corridor. 

Oklahoma City to South Texas

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will evaluate a range of passenger rail service options in an 850-

mile corridor from Oklahoma City to south Texas and will conclude with a service-level environmental impact 

statement. The study will consider the corridor as a whole, as well as three discrete portions of the corridor: 

• Oklahoma City to Dallas/Fort Worth 

• Dallas/Fort Worth to San Antonio 

• San Antonio to Rio Grande Valley / Corpus Christi / Laredo 

Scoping Comments 

Send your scoping comments through April 26, 2013. 

Comments may also be mailed to: 

Mark Werner 

TxDOT – RRD 

125 E. 11th St. 

Austin, TX 78701 

Scoping is designed to gather input on three topics: 

• The purpose and need for the study. 

• The range of intercity passenger rail alternatives to be studied in the EIS. 

• Environmental resources that could be affected by the proposed rail alternatives. 

Please note that this is a public process. As part of the agency record for this action, comments you submit 

may be released in their entirety to a third-party requester, including identifiable personal information such 

as name, physical address, phone number, or email, if provided. 

Partners

Because the corridor extends into Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Department of Transportation is an important 

partner in the study. In addition, transit service providers, railroads, metropolitan planning organizations, 

cities and counties, and community members will be engaged throughout the study. 

More Information
• Overview

• Compliance

• Get Involved

• Meeting Materials

• Study Area Map

• Scoping Comments

• Contact Us

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study - Overview 

Home > Inside TxDOT > Projects > Studies > Statewide > Texas-Oklahoma 

Passenger Rail

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) commenced in winter 2013 and is expected to be 

completed by fall 2014. It will document the costs, benefits, and impacts of rail service alternatives compared 

to a no-build alternative in a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

Environmental Impact Statement

The EIS, a federally required document that complies with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), will 

provide a high-level review of rail needs and potential service options in the corridor (called a service-level 

EIS). The study could conclude with a decision to advance individual projects for more detailed study or a 

decision against making further investments in passenger rail in the corridor. Before any identified project 

could be constructed, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) would need to complete additional

environmental review and identify funding. 

History

High-speed passenger rail has been under consideration in Texas since the late 1980s. In the 1990s, a private 

consortium was awarded a franchise to design, build, and operate high-speed rail in the state. Although 

demand appeared to support the development of high-speed rail, lack of funding and other obstacles 

prevented the project from moving forward. Since then, other proposals for high-speed passenger rail in 

Texas have been submitted to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), with each proposal showing 

revenues that exceed operating expenses but requiring some amount of funding to build. 

In 2000, FRA designated the South Central corridor, including the area from San Antonio to Dallas/Fort

Worth, as a future high-speed rail corridor. In 2010, TxDOT received a grant from FRA to study passenger rail 

in this corridor. 

Different Types of Passenger Rail

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study will consider a range of passenger rail options for the 850-mile 

corridor. Today’s passenger rail service can range in speed from 79 miles per hour to more than 220 miles per 

hour. The different speed options will influence ridership, the number and location of stations, and costs. 

Decision Making
TxDOT and FRA will make decisions about TOPRS after reviewing input from the public and other public 

agencies. 

More Information

• Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study - Home

• Contact Us

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study - Compliance 

Home > Inside TxDOT > Projects > Studies > Statewide > Texas-Oklahoma 

Passenger Rail

Because the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study is federally funded, the TxDOT must prepare a servicelevel environmental impact statement (EIS) to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). 

Through the NEPA process, TxDOT will document the impacts, benefits, and costs of proposed passenger rail 

alternatives compared to a no-build alternative (a no-build alternative provides a baseline for comparison in 

a future condition where the project being studied is not built, but other planned and funded projects are 

included). 

The service-level EIS will rely on conceptual passenger rail alternatives and will use existing information to 

document the benefits, impacts, and costs of those alternatives with the intent of learning enough to identify 

a preferred alternative or more likely, a package of preferred alternatives for different sections of the 

corridor. Depending on the identified preferred alternatives, more detailed studies may be required under 

NEPA. 

Scoping

The first step in the EIS process is scoping. During scoping, TxDOT and the Federal Railroad Administration 

(FRA) will invite the public to provide input about what should be studied in the service-level EIS. Specifically, 

TxDOT will seek input about the following: 

• The purpose and need for the study. 

• The range of passenger rail alternatives to be studied in the EIS. 

• Environmental resources that could be affected by the proposed rail alternatives. 

During scoping period, TxDOT will accept public comments in writing (at open houses or through the mail), 

through this website, and at public meetings held throughout the corridor. After the public scoping period 

ends, TxDOT will compile all comments received and determine the scope of the EIS. 

Service-Level Draft EIS

The service-level draft EIS will document the impacts, benefits, and costs of each passenger rail alternative 

compared to the no-build alternative. The draft EIS will consider a broad range of topics, including natural 

resources such as fish and wildlife habitat, wetlands, and water quality, as well as community resources such 

as economic development, land use, and historic properties. 
Once the draft EIS is complete, TxDOT and FRA will publish it for public review. The review period will include 

many ways for the public to provide comments, including at least one public hearing. After the public review 

period is complete, TxDOT and FRA will agree on a preferred alternative, or a package of preferred 

alternatives for different sections of the corridor, for passenger rail service in the corridor. 

Service-Level Final EIS and Record of Decision (ROD)

Once a preferred alternative is identified, TxDOT will prepare a final EIS that responds to comments received 

on the draft EIS. It will also include additional detail, such as mitigation measures for unavoidable impacts 

that might result from the preferred alternative. Once the final EIS is complete, FRA will issue a record of 

decision (ROD), which codifies the FRA’s concurrence with the service-level NEPA process and paves the way 

for TxDOT to move forward with project-level activities. 

To complete the service-level EIS, a service development plan will also be prepared. This plan will outline the 

benefits and financial plan for the corridor based on the preferred alternatives. It will prioritize the projects 

to be developed within the corridor, identify costs, and potential funding sources. 

More Information

• Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study - Home

• Contact Us

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study - Get Involved 

Home > Inside TxDOT > Projects > Studies > Statewide > Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail

We want to hear from you during the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger 

Rail Study (TOPRS). There will be many ways to get involved with the study, ranging from attending open 

houses or meetings, reviewing written information, or reviewing information and providing input online. 

Online Open House

If you can’t make one of the scoping open houses listed below, join our online open house now. Review all of 

the display boards in either English or Spanish and then tell us what you think using theonline comment form. 

We appreciate your input! 

Scoping Open Houses

All scoping public open houses will be held from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. Children are welcome to attend. There are 

12 opportunities to attend. Locations are listed below. 

• Meeting Notice

Ardmore, OK

Tuesday, March 26 

Ardmore Train Station 

251 E Main St. 
Austin, TX

Wednesday, March 27 

TxDOT Austin District 

7901 N I-35, Bldg. 7 

Belton, TX

Monday, April 1 

Central Texas COG 

2180 N Main St. 

Corpus Christi, TX

Tuesday, April 2 

TxDOT Corpus Christi District 

1701 S Padre Island Drive 

Fort Worth, TX

Thursday, March 28 

TxDOT Ft. Worth District 

2501 SW Loop 820 

Dallas, TX

Wednesday, April 3 

MSDC Offices 

8828 N Stemmons Fwy, Suite 550 

Harlingen, TX - Location Update

Thursday, April 4 

Harlingen Town Hall 

118 E Tyler Ave. 

(Please note, the meeting will not be held at City Hall, 502 E Tyler Ave.) 

Laredo, TX

Wednesday, April 3 

TxDOT Laredo District 

1817 Bob Bullock Loop 

Oklahoma City, OK

Monday, March 25 

Metro Tech Center 

1900 Springlake Drive 

San Antonio, TX

Monday, April 1 

Windcrest Civic Center 

9310 Jim Seal Drive, Windcrest 

Sherman, TX

Tuesday, April 2 
Sherman Senior Center 

1500 N Broughton St. 

Waco, TX

Monday, March 25 

Heart of Texas COG 

1514 S New Road 

Scoping Comments 

Send your scoping comments through April 26, 2013. 

Comments may also be mailed to: 

Mark Werner 

TxDOT – RRD 

125 E. 11th St. 

Austin, TX 78701 

Scoping is designed to gather input on three topics: 

• The purpose and need for the study. 

• The range of intercity passenger rail alternatives to be studied in the EIS. 

• Environmental resources that could be affected by the proposed rail alternatives. 

Please note that this is a public process. As part of the agency record for this action, comments you submit 

may be released in their entirety to a third-party requester, including identifiable personal information such 

as name, physical address, phone number, or email, if provided. 

More Information

• Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study - Home

• Contact Us

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study - Meeting Materials 

Home > Inside TxDOT > Projects > Studies > Statewide > Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail

This page includes materials produced as part of the service-level 

environmental impact statement (EIS). Items posted here will include finalized material used at meetings, 

such as public scoping meetings, technical working groups, and other public events. 

Date Title Format

03/13 Notice of Intent, published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, March 

13, 2013 
03/13 Stakeholder Workshop Meeting Presentation 

03/22 Online Open House 

03/22 Línea de Puertas Abiertas 

03/25 Poster 

More Information

• Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study - Home

• Contact Us

SCOPING REPORT 

Appendix D 

Public Scoping Meeting Materials 

 The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) will evaluate a range

 of passenger rail service opti ons in an 850-mile corridor from Oklahoma City

 to south Texas and will conclude with a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS). 

 The fi rst step in the EIS process is scoping; when the Texas Department of Transportati on 

(TxDOT) and the Federal Railroad Administrati on (FRA) will invite the public to provide 

input about what should be studied in the service-level EIS. The public scoping comment 

period ends on April 26, 2013.

• Mail to: Mark Werner, Rail Division, TxDOT, 125 E. 11th Street, Austi n, TX 78701-2483

• Submit comments at www.TXOKrail.org

• Att end one of the scoping meeti ngs listed below

in coordinati on with Oklahoma DOT

To provide scoping comments:

Visit www.TXOKrail.org to learn more.

Public Open House Schedule

Want more informati on on the project? Feel free to join us at any of the 

following 12 public open houses. 

Participate in scoping the

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study

Ardmore, OK

Tuesday, March 26

6 - 8 p.m.

Ardmore Train Station

251 E. Main Street

Belton, TX 

Monday, April 1

6 - 8 p.m.

Central Texas COG

2180 N. Main St.

Austin, TX

Wednesday, March 27

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Austin Offi ce

7901 N. IH-35, Bldg. 7

Sherman, TX

Tuesday, April 2

6 - 8 p.m.

Sherman Senior Center

1500 N. Broughton St.

Waco, TX

Monday, March 25

6 - 8 p.m.

Heart of Texas COG

1514 S. New Rd.

San Antonio, TX

Monday, April 1 

6 - 8 p.m.

Windcrest Civic Center

9310 Jim Seal Dr., 

Windcrest, TX

Dallas, TX

Wednesday, April 3

6 - 8 p.m.

DFW MSDC Offi ces

8828 N. Stemmons Fwy, 

Suite 550

Harlingen, TX

Thursday, April 4

6 - 8 p.m.

Harlingen City Hall

502 E. Tyler Ave.

Corpus Christi, TX

Tuesday, April 2

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Offi ces

1701 S. Padre Island Dr.

Oklahoma City, OK

Monday, March 25

6 - 8 p.m.

Metro Tech Center

1900 Springlake Drive

Fort Worth, TX

Thursday, March 28

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Training Offi ces

2501 S.W. Loop 820

Laredo, TX

Wednesday, April 3

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Offi ces

1817 Bob Bullock Ave.

Las personas con discapacidades que estén pensando en asisti r a esta reunión y que necesiten servicios o ayuda auxiliar se le 

pide que se pongan en contacto con Mark Werner al (512) 486-5137, por lo menos tres días antes de la reunión, para poder 

hacer los arreglos necesarios.

Persons with disabiliti es who plan to att end this meeti ng and who may 

need auxiliary aides or services are requested to contact Mark Werner at 

(512) 486-5137 at least three days prior to the meeti ng so that appropriate 

arrangements can be made.

Newsletter

in coordinati on with Oklahoma DOT

TxDOT launches study of passenger 

rail from Oklahoma City to South Texas

 Texas’ populati on and economy are booming, 

with much of its growth occurring in the alreadycongested IH-35 corridor. While the Texas 

Department of Transportati on (TxDOT) conti nues 

to look at roadway improvements to keep all of us 

and our economy moving, other opti ons, such as 

passenger rail service, fi t the needs of many travelers 

and would reduce demand on the state’s roadways. 

Through the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study 

(TOPRS), TxDOT will consider how passenger rail 

service could fi t into this corridor. 

 TOPRS will evaluate a range of passenger rail 

service opti ons in an 850-mile corridor from 

Oklahoma City to south Texas and will conclude with 

a service-level environmental impact statement 

(EIS). The study will consider the corridor as a whole, 

as well as within three segments: 

 • Oklahoma City to Dallas/Fort Worth

 • Dallas/Fort Worth to San Antonio

 • San Antonio to Rio Grande Valley / Corpus 

 Christi / Laredo

 Because the corridor extends north of the Red 

River to Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Department of 

Transportati on (ODOT) is an important partner in the 

study. In additi on, transit service providers, railroads, 

metropolitan planning organizati ons (MPOs), and 

citi es and counti es, as well as community members, 

will be engaged throughout the study. 

Map of the TOPRS corridor.

Volume 1, Issue 1 March 2013

Para leer este boletí n informati vo en 

español, consulte la página 3.

1
What is scoping?

 During scoping, the first step in the EIS process, 

TxDOT and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 

will invite the public to provide input about what should 

be studied in the service-level EIS. 

 During the scoping period, TxDOT will accept public 

comments in writing, through the TOPRS website, 

and at public meetings held throughout the 

corridor. After the public scoping period ends 

on April 26, 2013, TxDOT will compile all 

comments received and determine 

the scope of the EIS.

The interior of a passenger rail line off ers amenities for 

commuters.

Get involved

 We want to hear from you during the Texas-Oklahoma 

Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS). There will be many ways to get 

involved with the study, ranging from att ending open houses 

or meeti ngs, reviewing writt en informati on, or reviewing 

informati on and providing input through the project website. 

 A series of 12 open houses will take place in March and April 

2013 throughout the corridor. Each meeti ng will contain a brief 

presentati on of the project and its objecti ves, displays to show 

the areas impacted and staff to answer questi ons.

 If you are unable to att end a meeti ng, feel free to join in on 

an online meeti ng at www.TXOKrail.org.

Ready to submit your 

comments?

Please submit your comments through April 26, 2013. 

Comments received by this date will be included in the 

scoping summary report.

ATTEND A MEETING:

Comments can be submitt ed verbally or in writi ng at any 

of the 12 public meeti ngs listed on Page 5.

ONLINE:

Submit your comment online by going to

 www.TXOKrail.org.

MAIL:

Comments can be mailed directly to

Mark Werner, Rail Division

Texas Department of Transportati on

125 E. 11th St.

 Austi n, TX 78701-2483

More about TOPRS

 The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) is 

expected to be completed in 24 months. It will document 

the costs, benefi ts, and impacts of rail service alternati ves 

compared to a no-build alternati ve in a service-level 

environmental impact statement (EIS). 

 The EIS, a federally required document that complies with 

the Nati onal Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), will provide a 

high-level review of rail needs and potenti al service opti ons 

in the corridor. The study could conclude with a decision to 

advance individual projects for more detailed study or a 

decision against making further investments in passenger rail 

in the corridor. 

 Before any identi fi ed project could be constructed, the 

Texas Department of Transportati on (TxDOT) would need to 

complete additi onal environmental review and identi fy funding.

2

Contact Us

Feel free to contact us with any comments or questi ons.

(512) 486-5137 

www.TXOKrail.org
Boletín

TxDOT lanza un estudio sobre trenes de 

pasajeros desde Oklahoma City al Sur de Texas

 Tanto la población como la economía de Texas se 

encuentran en pleno auge, con una gran parte de este 

crecimiento ocurriendo en el ya congesti onado corredor 

IH-35. Mientras que el Departamento de Transporte 

del estado de Texas (TxDOT; por sus siglas en inglés), 

conti nua realizando mejorías en las vías de transporte 

para mantenernos a nosotros y a nuestra economía en 

movimiento, existen otras opciones, como el servicio 

de tren de pasajeros, que cumplen muy bien con las 

necesidades de muchos viajeros y reducirían la demanda 

sobre las carreteras y autopistas del estado. A través del 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) (Estudio 

de trenes de pasajeros entre Texas y Oklahoma), TxDOT 

evaluará la forma en la que el servicio de tren de 

pasajeros podría incluirse en este corredor. 

 TOPRS evaluará un rango de servicios de tren de 

pasajeros dentro de un corredor de 850 millas desde 

Oklahoma City hasta el Sur de Texas y concluirá con 

una declaración sobre el impacto ambiental al nivel 

del servicio (EIS; por sus siglas en inglés). El estudio 

considerará el corredor como una unidad entera y 

también separada en tres segmentos:

 • De Oklahoma City a Dallas/Fort Worth

 • De Dallas/Fort Worth a San Antonio

 • De San Antonio a Rio Grande Valley / Corpus

 Christi / Laredo 

 Debido a que el corredor se exti ende más al norte 

de Red River hasta Oklahoma, el Departamento de 

Transporte del Estado de Oklahoma (ODOT; por sus siglas 

en inglés) es un socio importante en este estudio. Además, 

Mapa del corredor TOPRS.

proveedores de servicios de tránsito, ferrocarriles y 

organizaciones de planeación metropolitana (MPOs; por 

sus siglas en ingles) y ciudades y condados, así como 

miembros de la comunidad, parti ciparán a lo largo del 

estudio. en el estudio. 

3

Volumen 1, Número 1 Marzo 2013

en coordinación con los Oklahoma DOT
¿Qué es el estudio de 

evaluación?

Durante el estudio de evaluación, el primer paso el en el 

proceso EIS, TxDOT y la Administración Federal de Ferrocarriles 

(FRA; por sus siglas en inglés) invitarán al público a dar su 

opinión acerca de lo que se debe estudiar en el EIS a nivel de 

servicio. 

 Durante el periodo de evaluación, TxDOT aceptará 

comentarios por escrito del público a través del siti o web de 

TOPRS, y en reuniones abiertas al público que se llevarán 

a cabo a lo largo del corredor. Después del periodo 

de evaluación inicial que termina el 26 de Abril del 

2013, TxDOT juntará todos los comentarios 

recibidos y determinará el alcance 

del EIS.

El interior de un tren de pasajeros que ofrece 

comodidades para los viajeros.

Participe

 Queremos saber su opinión durante el Estudio de Trenes de 

Pasajeros Texas-Oklahoma. Habrá muchas formas de parti cipar 

en el estudio, desde jornadas de puertas abiertas o reuniones, 

revisar información por escrito, o revisar información y brindar 

contribuciones a través de la página web del proyecto. 

 Una serie de 12 jornadas de puertas abiertas se llevará a 

cabo en Marzo y Abril del 2013 a lo largo del corredor. Cada 

reunión incluirá una breve presentación del proyecto y de 

sus objeti vos, exhibiciones para mostrar las áreas afectadas y 

personal para responder preguntas. 

 Si no le es posible asisti r a una reunión, le invitamos a 

que parti cipe en una de nuestras reuniones en línea en 

www.TXOKrail.org.

Más acerca de TOPRS

 Se esti ma que el Estudio de Trenes de Pasajeros TexasOklahoma (TOPRS) se completará en 24 meses. El estudio 

documentará los costos, benefi cios e impactos de las 

alternati vas de trenes de pasajeros en comparación con una 

alternati va que no requiere construcción por medio de una 

declaración de impacto ambiental al nivel de servicio (EIS). 

 El EIS, un documento requerido por el gobierno federal que 

cumple con la Ley Nacional de Políti ca Ambiental (NEPA; por 

sus siglas en inglés), proporcionará una revisión de alto nivel 

de las necesidades de ferrocarriles y de las posibles opciones 

de servicio en el corredor. El estudio podría concluir con una 

conclusión de avanzar proyectos individuales para un estudio 

más detallado o con una decisión en contra de realizar más 

inversiones en trenes de pasajeros en el corredor. 

 Antes de poder construir cualquier proyecto identi fi cado, 

el Departamento de Transporte de Texas (TxDOT) necesitará 

llevar a cabo más revisiones ambientales y determinar la 

fuente de fi nanciamiento. 

¿Listo para presentar 

sus comentarios?

Por favor presente sus comentarios antes del 26 de abril 

del 2013. Todos los comentarios que se reciban antes de 

esta fecha serán incluidos en el resumen del informe de 

evaluación inicial.

ASISTIR A UNA REUNIÓN:

Los comentarios pueden presentarse o bien verbalmente 

o por escrito en cualquiera de la 12 reuniones públicas 

detalladas en la página 5. 

EN LÍNEA:

Presente su comentario en línea en www.TXOKrail.org.

POR CORREO:

Los comentarios se pueden enviar directamente por 

correo a la siguiente dirección: 

Mark Werner, Rail Division

Texas Department of Transportati on

125 E. 11th St.

 Austi n, TX 78701-2483

4

Contáctenos

Le invitamos a que se ponga en contacto con nosotros 

para cualquier comentario o pregunta que tenga.

(512) 486-5137

www.TXOKrail.org
5

Public Meeting Schedule

Programa de Reuniones Públicas

Oklahoma City, OK

Monday, March 25

6 - 8 p.m.

Metro Tech Center

1900 Springlake Dr.

Ardmore, OK

Tuesday, March 26

6 - 8 p.m.

Ardmore Train Station

251 E. Main St.

Sherman, TX

Tuesday, April 2

6 - 8 p.m.

Sherman Senior Center

1500 N. Broughton St.

Fort Worth, TX

Thursday, March 28

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Training Offi ces

2501 S.W. Loop 820

Dallas, TX

Wednesday, April 3

6 - 8 p.m.

DFW MSDC Offi ces

8828 N. Stemmons Fwy., 

Suite 550

Belton, TX 

Monday, April 1

6 - 8 p.m.

Central Texas COG

2180 N. Main St.

Waco, TX

Monday, March 25

6 - 8 p.m.

Heart of Texas COG

1514 S. New Rd.

Austin, TX

Wednesday, March 27

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Austin Offi ce

7901 N. IH-35, Bldg. 7

San Antonio, TX

Monday, April 1 

6 - 8 p.m.

Windcrest Civic Center

9310 Jim Seal Dr., 

Windcrest, TX

Harlingen, TX

Thursday, April 4

6 - 8 p.m.

Harlingen City Hall

502 E. Tyler Ave.

Corpus Christi, TX

Tuesday, April 2

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Offi ces

1701 S. Padre Island Dr.

Laredo, TX

Wednesday, April 3

6 - 8 p.m.

TxDOT Offi ces

1817 Bob Bullock Ave.

Want more informati on on the project? Feel free to join us at any of the following 12 public meeti ngs 

throughout Oklahoma and Texas. All meeti ng locati ons are ADA accessible. Any special requests must be 

made 3 days in advance.

¿Desea obtener más información acerca del proyecto? Le invitamos a que nos acompañe en cualquiera de las 

12 reuniones públicas en Oklahoma y Texas que se indican a conti nuación. Todas las instalaciones donde se 

llevarán a cabo las reuniones son accesibles para personas con discapacidades. Solicitudes especiales deben 

realizarse con al menos 3 días de anti cipación. 

Existing rail lines in Austin, McGregor and Waco, Texas. (left to right)

Líneas actuales de ferrocarril en Austin, McGregor y Waco, Texas (de izquierda a derecha)
Texas-Oklahoma 

Passenger Rail Study

Welcome to the 

scoping open house!
INTRODUCTION
Welcome!

At this scoping open house you can 

provide input to help shape the TexasOklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS). 

Tonight, you can review information and 

provide input on:

• The study’s purpose and need

• Possible future passenger rail routes, 

stations, and service levels

• Issues to study

Please fill out a comment form before 

you leave. We want to hear from you!
Esta noche usted puede:

Más información acerca de una "reunión 

informativa", proporcionando a su entrada, lo 

que contribuirá a configurar el entre TexasOklahoma Rail Pasajeros Estudio (TORPE).

Obtenga información y dar su opinión sobre:

• El estudio del propósito y la necesidad

• Los valores y los temas a estudiar

• Rutas de pasajeros por ferrocarril y estaciones

Llenar un formulario de comentarios y se 

basan en los mapas que nos diga lo que 

piensa. Queremos saber de ti!
What is the TOPRS?

• The study will look at a range of passenger 

rail service options in an 850-mile corridor 

from Oklahoma City to south Texas 

– North section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and 

Fort Worth

– Central section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San 

Antonio

– South section: San Antonio to Corpus Christi, 

Brownsville, and Laredo

• The study is funded by the Federal Railroad 

Administration (FRA) through Texas 

Department of Transportation (TxDOT), in 

coordination with the Oklahoma 

Department of Transportation (ODOT)
Where is the study area?
How are decisions made?

Texas Department 

of Transportation

Federal Railroad Administration

Oklahoma 

DOT

Stakeholder Workshops

Public Agencies

General 

Public

Study Team 
What is the process?

24-month Schedule

Scoping – (learn more) – collect public comments through 

April 26, 2013

Service-level draft EIS – (compare) – study and compare 

Tonight – tell us about the area and needs for the study 

Summer 2013– tell us what you think about draft alternatives

Service-level draft EIS – (compare) – study and compare 

the alternatives against each other and “no-build”

Service-level final EIS – (refine) – include public and agency 

comments into a final document, with a preferred 

alternative

Public review of the study results and suggest an 

alternative to move forward for further study

Record of Decision (ROD) – (decide) – determine that the 

EIS process is complete and allow TxDOT to move forward 

with projects
Schedule

Gather data, develop, 

screen alternatives, 

and set goals

Analyze and select 

alternatives

Refine analysis and 

secure agency 

approvals

Alternatives 

analysis

Scoping Draft service-level 

EIS

Final service-level 

NEPA EIS/Record of 

Winter

2013

Spring

2013

Summer 

2013

Fall 

2013

Winter 

2014

Spring 

2014

Summer 

2014

Fall 

2014

Scoping 

meetings

Open 

houses

Public hearings/ 

Open Houses

Website

Stakeholder workshops

Small group and community meetings

Key public 

involvement 

activities

Winter

2013

Spring

2013

Summer 

2013

Fall 

2013

Winter 

2014

Spring 

2014

Summer 

2014

Fall 

2014

Scoping

EIS

EIS/Record of 

Decision

NEPA
PURPOSE AND NEED 

FOR THE STUDY
What’s the purpose of the study?

• The purpose of TOPRS is to evaluate 

alternatives to provide intercity 

passenger rail service to meet future 

needs and to improve rail facilities, 

reduce journey times, and improve 

connections with public transit. 

Do you agree? Are there any other 

reasons to do this study?
Why is the study needed?

• These possible improvements are 

needed because population and 

business growth in the study area has 

resulted in growing congestion in the 

IH-35 corridor.

– IH-35 is a nationally significant highway 

where average speeds may drop to 15 mph 

by 2035

– Intercity passenger rail service is an 

alternative to meet future demand for travel

What do you think? Are there any 

other needs that should be looked at 

during the study?
Purpose and need: North section

Current Heartland Flyer rail service:

• One train each direction per day

• Annual ridership has increased by 10% 

in the last three years

• Most passengers would have driven or 

not made these trips at all 

• Operates on a busy freight rail line, 

which causes delays and inconvenient 

schedules

Some needs in this section:

• Enhanced railroad facilities (such as automated train 

controls) to increase speeds and maintain safety

• Better coordination with other passenger rail services to 

increase the attractiveness of rail

• Direct connection to the City of Dallas and the Dallas/Fort 

Worth airport (DFW)

• More roadway/railroad grade separations to enhance safety 

where rail and roadways cross
Purpose and need: Central section

Current Texas Eagle Amtrak service:

• From Fort Worth, daily connections with 

the Heartland Flyer (intercity rail service 

to Oklahoma City)

• From San Antonio, connections with the 

Sunset Limited to New Orleans and Los 

Angeles

• About 23% of Amtrak train trips start and end in Texas (travel

only within the state)

• The section with the highest demand for intercity travel (has 

high auto and truck volumes)

• There is a high volume of intrastate air travel in this section

Some needs in this section:

• Offer alternatives to driving and flying

• Improve connectivity and trip coordination between rail 

providers

• Rail access to airports including DFW, Austin, and San 

Antonio
Purpose and need: South section

Currently no passenger rail services: 

• Amtrak provides passenger service south of San Antonio by 

motor coach

• Motor coaches provide much of the intercity public

transportation within the region and destinations in the US 

and Mexico

• Population and business growth along the border area is 

increasing congestion, particularly for commercial trucks

Some needs in this section:

• New intercity travel options, such as passenger rail, that do 

not add to highway congestion

• Efficient, safe, equitable, and affordable alternative to 

highway, bus, or air travel

• Consider the cross-border travel demand to Mexican

destinations such as Monterrey, a major business hub and 

potential source of passenger rail demand
SERVICE-LEVEL EIS
What is a service-level EIS?

• The service-level EIS is a high level study that 

leads to big-picture decisions (federally 

required through NEPA)

• TxDOT will document the impacts, benefits, 

and costs of proposed passenger rail 

alternatives

Scoping: 

identify

what should 

be studied 

in the EIS

Draft EIS: 

compare 

proposed 

alternatives 

including a 

no-build 

alternative

Final EIS: 

respond to 

comments 

and refine 

the analysis 

in the draft 

EIS

Record of 

Decision: 

Decide the 

level of 

passenger 

rail service 

for further 

development
What’s being studied?

• An EIS looks at a broad range of topics, 

including: 

Community resources 

• Cultural resources

• Economic

development

Natural resources 

• Air quality

• Energy

• Fish & wildlife 

What other resources/topics should be 

studied?

development

• Historic properties

• Land use

• Noise & vibration

• Safety & security

• Transportation

• Fish & wildlife 

habitat

• Wetlands

• Water quality
Existing rail in the study area
INTERCITY PASSENGER 

RAIL
Passenger rail service options

Maximum/

average miles 

per hour

Stops/

frequency Typical characteristics

Conventional 

(mostly uses existing 

tracks) 

Max: 

70-90 mph

Average: 

45-60 mph

Stops 15 to 60 

miles apart

3-6 trains/day

each direction 

(no more than 

12)

Un/reserved seats; limited 

business class seating, café food 

service, and checked baggage; 

diesel locomotive hauled

Passenger rail serves multiple cities along a railway, with limited stops. It 

can operate at different speeds and frequencies.

21

Higher speed 

(some dedicated tracks)

Max: 

110-125 mph

Average: 

70-85 mph

Stops 30 to 90 

miles apart

4-8 trains/day 

each direction 

(as many as 12)

Reserved seats; business class 

seating; café food service; no 

checked baggage; diesel and 

electric locomotive hauled

High speed

(fully dedicated tracks)

Max:

165-220 mph

Average:

100-140 mph

Stops 50 to 

100+ miles

apart

12-24 

trains/day 

each direction

Reserved seats; business class 

seating; café and at-seat food 

service; no checked baggage; 

electric multiple unit locomotive

Common Attributes: Single or double deck trains, stations with parking, operation on existing or 

dedicated tracks 
What isn’t being studied?

Other modes Why not?

Commuter rail Being studied separately in some areas

Generally confined to the influence area 

of a city rather than providing intercity 

travel

The study is examining connections between cities in Oklahoma and 

south Texas, along the IH-35 corridor. 

Light rail Provides connections within cities and 

suburbs

Streetcar Provides connections within cities 

Highways, airports, 

and other non-rail 

modes

Passenger rail is an alternative to these 

other intercity travel modes

Existing and future highway and air travel 

congestion reduces options (including 

bus service) 
• Improved passenger rail service on existing 

rail routes

– Station improvements

– Improved connections to other transit service

– Improved speeds and frequencies

• New passenger rail service

– Service to new cities

What types of improvements could 

be studied?

What other improvements could be 

considered?

– Service to new cities

– Station improvements or new stations

– Various speeds and frequencies

– New or existing routes

– locations
EXISTING CONDITIONS

24






CONNECTION OPTIONS

31
What services should be evaluated?

The service-level 

EIS will compare 

passenger rail 

alternatives in the 

area shown on the 

map.

Which cities should be connected by 

passenger rail? 
North Section Options
Central Section Options
South Section Options
Section Options

• Incremental improvements (i.e. grade 

Which cities should be served by passenger 

rail? 

What types of improvements should be 

considered? 

• Incremental improvements (i.e. grade 

separations)

• Additional rail within existing rail corridors

• High speed rail in a new corridor

• Passenger rail schedules

What else should be looked at?
Next steps

• The study team will review public 

comments and develop 

alternatives

• The study team will use the 

purpose and need to screen 

alternatives

• The study team will host another 

open house where you can review 

the alternatives that will be studied 

in the service-level EIS
Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study

in cooperation with Oklahoma DOT 

Guide to participating: Scoping for Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study

The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), in coordination with the Oklahoma Department of 

Transportation (ODOT) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), is holding a “scoping process” to 

hear from you about the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS).

 TxDOT wants to hear from you as we start to study passenger rail service as a viable option for

improving congestion in the IH-35 corridor.

Read on to learn more about how you can participate in this important step in the service-level 

environmental impact statement (EIS) process.

Submit comments through April 26, 2013 

“Scoping” is the first step in the federal environmental documentation process. During this time, 

TxDOT and FRA invite you to provide input about what should be studied in the service-level EIS. 

During the “scoping process” you can learn about the service-level EIS process, potential options for

intercity passenger rail between Oklahoma City and south Texas, and provide comments on what 

should be studied and potential impacts. 

What are “scoping” comments?

“Scoping” is designed to gather input on three topics: 

 The purpose and need for the study.

 The range of intercity passenger rail alternatives to be studied in the service-level EIS.

 Environmental resources that could be affected by the proposed rail alternatives. 

You can also tell us any other thoughts or concerns you have about the study. 

TxDOT and FRA will compile all of the comments into a “scoping report.” Similar comments will be 

grouped and considered together. Decisions about what to include in the EIS will be documented in a 

“scoping report.”

Send your comments by April 26: 

Mail: 

Mark Werner, Rail Division, TxDOT

125 E. 11th Street

Austin, TX 78701-2483

In-person: 

At one of the in-person 

open houses 

(see details below)

Website: 

www.TXOKrail.org
in cooperation with Oklahoma DOT 

Open houses

In addition to the online open house, there will be 12 in-person open houses (locations, dates & times 

below). 

All open houses will be held from 6:00 to 8:00 pm and are drop-in events where you can come at any 

time and stay as long as you like. Children are welcome. 

Each open house will include:

 A welcome area where you can learn about the meeting format.

 A short presentation from TxDOT staff (every 30 minutes).

 Areas where you can review information, talk to staff, and write scoping comments.

 Una presentación en Español.

Equal access

To ensure equal access, auxiliary aids/services to persons with disabilities will be provided. 

Persons with disabilities who plan to attend a scoping open house and who may need auxiliary aides or 

services are requested to contact Mark Werner at (512) 486-5137 at least three days prior to the 

meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. 

Si usted require ests documento en un formato alternativo, favor de communicarse a la siguienta linea 

directa (512) 486-5137. 

Ardmore, OK

Tuesday, March 26

Ardmore Train Station

251 E. Main St.

Austin, TX

Wednesday, March 27

TxDOT Austin Office

7901 N. IH-35, Bldg. 7

Belton, TX

Monday, April 1

Central Texas COG

2180 N. Main St.

Harlingen, TX

Thursday, April 4

Harlingen City Hall

502 E Tyler Ave.

Oklahoma City, OK

Monday, March 25

Metro Tech Center

1900 Springlake Dr.

San Antonio, TX

Monday, April 1

Windcrest Civic Center

9310 Jim Seal Dr., 

Windcrest

Sherman, TX

Tuesday, April 2

Sherman Senior 

Center

1500 N. Broughton St.

Waco, TX

Monday, March 25

Heart of Texas COG

1514 S. New Rd.

Corpus Christi, TX

Tuesday, April 2

TxDOT Offices

1701 S. Padre Island 

Dr.

Dallas, TX

Thursday, April 3

MSDC Offices

8828 N. Stemmons 

Fwy, Suite 550

Fort Worth, TX

Thursday, March 28

TxDOT Training 

Center

2501 S.W. Loop 820

Laredo, TX

Wednesday, April 3

TxDOT Offices

1817 Bob Bullock 

Loop.
Maximum/

average speed

Stops/

frequency Typical characteristics

Conventional 

(mostly 

uses 

existing 

tracks) 

Max: 

70-90 mph

Average: 

45-60 mph

Stops every 15 to 

60 miles

3-6 trains/day

each direction

Unreserved and Reserved 

seats, limited business class 

seating, limited café food 

service, limited checked 

baggage, diesel loco hauled

Higher speed 

(some 

dedicated 

tracks) 

Max: 

110-125 mph

Average: 

70-85 mph

Stops 30 to 90 

miles apart

6-12 trains/day 

each direction 

Reserved seats, business 

class seating, café food 

service, no checked baggage, 

diesel and electric loco 

hauled

High speed

(fully 

dedicated 

tracks)

Max:

165-220 mph

Average:

100-150 mph

Stops 50 to 100+ 

miles apart

12-24 trains/day 

each direction

Reserved seats, business 

class seating, café and atseat food service, no 

checked baggage, electric 

multiple unit

Types of intercity passenger rail

Common Attributes: Single or double deck trains, stations with parking and transit access, operation on existing or dedicated tracks 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study

in cooperation with Oklahoma DOT 

Scoping Comment Form

Provide thoughts, ideas, and concerns that you have on the service-level environmental impact statement 

(EIS). Comments will become part of the scoping report, which will help TxDOT decide what to study. Submit 

comments by April 26, 2013, by mail, online at www.TXOKrail.org, or at a scoping open house.

I have specific concerns about the following: Attach more pages if necessary. 

□ Effects on residents, businesses, and visitors:

□ Effects on safety and neighborhood livability (such as noise and railroad crossings):

□ Effects on the local and regional economy (such as agriculture and tourism):

□ Effects on traffic conditions (for cars, walking, biking, etc):

□ Effects on the natural environment (such as water quality and habitat):

□ Other (use back or attach pages)
The Texas Department of Transportation ensures compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 49 CFR, part 21; related 

statutes and regulations to the end that no person shall be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of, or be

subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of 

Transportation on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin. 

TxDOT requests demographic information at public events to evaluate the effectiveness of public outreach activities. The identity 

of individuals is kept confidential. The results are reported as totals only, and used solely to help improve future community 

engagement. Providing this information is voluntary. Check all that apply.

Race/Ethnicity Language Spoken at Home Gender Identity ZIP Code

 African-American 

 Caucasian (not of Hispanic origin) 

 Hispanic/Latino 

 American Indian or Alaskan Native 

 Asian or Pacific Islander 

 Unknown/Do not wish to disclose

 English

 Español

 Other: _________

_________________

 Do not wish to disclose

 Male

 Female

 _______________

 Do not wish to disclose

________

(Texas Transportation Code, §201.811(a)(5)): check each of the following boxes that apply to you: 

□ I am employed by TxDOT □ I do business with TxDOT □ I could benefit monetarily from the project/item I’m commenting on

Please mail comments by April 26, 2013

Mark Werner, Rail Division

Texas Department of Transportation

125 E. 11th Street

Austin, TX 78701-2483

Place 

stamp 

here

Fold Fold

Tape

Tape

Tape
Texas-Oklahoma 

Passenger Rail Study

¡Bienvenido a la reunión

de consulta pública!
Esta noche usted puede:

Obtener más información y proporcionar sus 

aportes, lo cual contribuirá a determinar los 

objetivos y el alcance del Estudio de Tren de 

Pasajeros entre Texas-Oklahoma (TORPE).

Obtenga información y opine sobre:

• El propósito y la necesidad del estudio

• El contenido y los temas a estudiar

• Rutas de trenes de pasajeros y estaciones

Llene un formulario de comentarios y 

basado en los mapas díganos lo que piensa. 

¡Queremos saber su opinión!
INTRODUCCIÓN
¿Qué es el TOPRS?

• El estudio examinará opciones de ferrocarril de 

pasajeros en un corredor de 850 millas entre la 

ciudad de Oklahoma y el sur de Texas

– Sección Norte: De Oklahoma City a Dallas y 

Fort Worth

– Sección Central: De Dallas y Fort Worth a San 

Antonio

– Sección Sur: De San Antonio a Corpus Christi, 

Brownsville, y Laredo

• El estudio es financiado por la Administración 

Federal de Ferrocarriles (FRA) a través del 

Departamento de Transporte de Texas Texas 

(TxDOT), en coordinación con el Departamento de 

Transporte de Oklahoma (ODOT)
¿Qué área abarca el Estudio?
¿Cómo se toman las decisiones?

Departamento de

Transporte

de Texas

Administración Federal de Ferrocarriles

Oklahoma 

DOT

Talleres para Partes

Interesadas

Agencias Públicas Público

General

Equipo del Estudio
Programa

Recaba datos, 

desarrolla,detecta

alternativas, 

establece metas

Analiza y selecciona

alternativas

Afina análisis y

asegura aprobación

de agencia

Análisis de 

alternativas

Consulta Pública EIS preliminar sobre

niveles de servicio

EIS final sobre

NEPA niveles de 

Invierno

2013

Primavera

2013

Verano

2013

Otoño

2013

Invierno

2014

Primavera 

2014

Verano

2014

Otoño 

2014

Consulta

Pública

Puertas

abierta

Audiencias

abiertas

públicas/puertas

Sitio en Web

Talleres para Partes Interesadas 

Reuniones comunitarias y de grupos pequeños

Actividades

clave de 

participación

pública

Invierno

2013

Primavera

2013

Verano

2013

Otoño

2013

Invierno

2014

Primavera 

2014

Verano

2014

Otoño

2014

Consulta Pública niveles de servicio niveles de 

servicio/Registro de 

Decisión

NEPA
OBJETIVO Y NECESIDAD 

DEL ESTUDIO
¿Cuál es el objetivo del estudio?

• El objetivo del TOPRS es evaluar 

alternativas de servicio interurbano 

de tren de pasajeros para satisfacer 

necesidades futuras y mejorar 

instalaciones ferroviarias, reducir 

tiempos de viaje y optimizar las 

conexiones con el tránsito público. 

¿Está de acuerdo? ¿Existen otras 

razones para realizar este estudio?
¿Por qué es necesario el estudio?

• Estas posibles mejoras son necesarias 

debido a que el crecimiento de la 

población y los negocios en el área de 

estudio ha producido congestión en 

el corredor IH-35.

– La ruta IH-35 es una autopista importante a 

nivel nacional en la cual las velocidades 

promedio podrían llegar a bajar hasta a 15 

mph para el 2035

– El servicio de tren de pasajeros interurbano 

es una alternativa para satisfacer futuras 

demandas de transporte

¿Qué piensa? ¿Existen otras necesidades 

que deberían considerarse durante el 

estudio?
EIS A NIVEL DE 

SERVICIO
¿Qué es la EIS a nivel de servicios?

• La EIS a nivel de servicios es un estudio de alto 

nivel que lleva a decisiones de gran dimensión 

(requerida federalmente por la ley NEPA)

• El TxDOT documentará los impactos, 

beneficios y costos de las alternativas de tren 

de pasajeros

Consulta 

Pública: 

identifica lo 

que debe 

estudiar la 

EIS

EIS 

Preliminar: 

compara 

alternativas 

propuestas 

incluyendo 

alternativa 

“no-build”

EIS Final: 

responde a 

comentarios 

y afina el 

análisis de 

la EIS

Registro de 

Decisión: 

Decide el 

nivel de 

servicio de 

tren de 

pasajeros a 

desarrollar
¿Qué está siendo estudiado?

• Una EIS examina una amplia gama de 

temas, incluyendo: 

Recursos comunitarios

• Recursos culturales

• Desarrollo económico

• Propiedades históricas

Recursos 

naturales

• Calidad del aire

• Energía

¿Qué otros recursos/temas deben ser 

estudiados?

• Propiedades históricas

• Uso de tierras

• Ruido y vibración

• Seguridad

• Transporte

• Energía

• Hábitat de 

peces y vida 

silvestre

• Humedales

• Calidad del 

agua
Trenes existentes en el área de estudio
¿QUÉ SE ESTUDIA?
Opciones de servicio de tren de pasajeros

Millas

máximas/

promedio 

por hora 

Paradas/

frecuencia Características típicas

Convencional 

( uso de vías existentes) 

Max: 

70-90 mph

Promedio: 

45-60 mph

Paradas a 15 -

60 millas de 

distancia

3-6 trenes/día

en cada 

dirección (no 

más de 12)

Asientos no reservados; asientos 

clase ejecutiva limitados, servicio 

cafetería y revisión equipaje ; 

locomotora diesel

El tren de pasajeros da servicio a múltiples ciudades a lo largo de la vía, 

con paradas limitadas. Puede operar a distintas velocidades y frecuencia.

16

Velocidad más alta 

(aglunas vías asignadas)

Max: 

110-125 mph

Promedio: 

70-85 mph

Paradas a 30 -

90 millas de 

distancia

4-8 trenes/día 

en cada 

dirección 

(hasta 12)

Asientos reservados; asientos 

clase ejecutiva; servicio cafetería; 

sin revisión de equipaje; 

locomotora diesel y eléctrica

Alta velocidad

(sólo vías asignadas )

Max:

165-220 mph

Promedio:

100-140 mph

Paradas a 50

hasta 100+ 

millas de dist.

12-24 

trenes/día en 

cada dirección

Asientos reservados; asientos 

clase ejecutiva; servicio cafetería 

y en cabina; sin revisión 

equipaje; locomotora eléctrica 

múltiple

Atributos comunes: Trenes de uno o dos pisos, estaciones con estacionamiento, 

operan en vías existentes o en vías especialmente asignadas 
¿Qué está siendo estudiado?

Otras modalidades ¿Por qué no?

Trenes suburbanos Están siendo estudiados por separado en 

algunas áreas

Generalmente confinados al área de 

influencia de una ciudad en lugar de 

proveer transporte interurbano

El estudio está examinando conexiones entre ciudades en 

Oklahoma y el sur de Texas, a lo largo del corredor IH-35. 

Trenes ligeros Proveen conexiones entre la ciudad y 

suburbios

Tranvías Proveen conexiones entre la ciudad

Autopistas,

aeropuertos y otras 

modalidades no 

ferroviarias

El tren de pasajeros es una alternativa a 

estas otras modalidades de transporte 

interurbano

La congestión existente y futura en las 

carreteras y vuelos aéreos reduce las 

opciones (incluyendo el servicio de bus) 
• Mejora el servicio de pasajeros en las rutas a 

ciudades existentes

– Mejoras de la estación de tren

– Conexiones entre trenes mejoradas

– Velocidades y periodicidad mejoradas

• Nuevo servicio de tren de pasajeros

– servicio a nuevas ciudades

¿Cuáles son algunas de las mejoras?

¿Qué otras mejoras podrían tomarse en 

cuenta?

– servicio a nuevas ciudades

– Nuevas ubicaciones de estación de tren y ciudades

– Hay varias velocidades y frecuencias

– Nuevos itinerarios de servicio de tren

– lugares
¿Qué servicios deberían ser evaluados?

La EIS a nivel de 

servicios 

comparará las 

alternativas de 

tren de pasajeros 

en el área que se 

muestra en el 

mapa.

¿Qué ciudades debería conectar el tren 

de pasajeros? 
Pasos siguientes

• El equipo de estudio revisará los 

comentarios públicos y desarrollará 

alternativas

• El equipo de estudio utilizará el 

objetivo y necesidades para 

detectar alternativas 

• El equipo de estudio organizará 

otra reunión abierta al público en 

donde podrá revisar las alternativas 

a ser estudiadas en la EIS a nivel de 

servicio
Obje%vo	y	necesidad:	Sección	norte	

Servicio	ferroviario	Heartland Flyer	actual:	

• Un	tren	en	cada	dirección	diario.	

• La	can0dad	de	pasajeros	al	año	ha	aumentado	en	

un	10%	en	los	úl0mos	tres	años.	

• La	mayoría	de	los	pasajeros	habrían	conducido	un	

automóvil	o	no	habrían	hecho	estos	viajes.	

• Opera	en	una	línea	de	ferrocarril	de	carga	de	

tráfico	intenso	lo	que	causa	retrasos	e	

inconvenientes.	

Algunas	necesidades	en	esta	sección:	

• Instalaciones	ferroviarias	mejoradas	(como	controles	de	trenes	

automa0zados)	para	mejorar	las	velocidades	y	mantener	la	

seguridad.	

• Mejor	coordinación	con	otros	servicios	de	trenes	de	pasajeros	

para	aumentar	el	atrac0vo	del	ferrocarril.	

• Conexión	directa	con	la	Ciudad	de	Dallas	y	el	aeropuerto	Dallas/

Fort	Worth	(DFW).	

• Más	pasos	a	desnivel	viales/ferroviarios	para	mejorar	la	

seguridad	en	los	puntos	de	cruce	del	ferrocarril	y	carreteras.	
Propósito	y	necesidad:	Sección	central	

Servicio	Eagle	Amtrak	Texas	actual:	

• Desde	Fort	Worth,	conexiones	diarias	con		el	

Heartland Flyer	(Servicio	de	trenes	

interurbano	con	la	ciudad	de	Oklahoma).	

• Desde	San	Antonio,	conexiones	con	Sunset

Limited	con	Nueva	Orleans	y	Los	Ángeles	

• Alrededor	del	23%	de	los	viajes	de	los	trenes	Amtrak	inician	y	

finalizan	en	Texas	(para	viajes	dentro	del	estado	únicamente).	

• La	sección	con	la	demanda	más	grande	de	viajes	interurbanos	

(0ene	altos	volúmenes	de	automóviles	y	camiones).	

• Existe	un	alto	volumen	de	viajes	aéreos	interestatales	en	esta	

sección.	

Algunas	necesidades	en	esta	sección:	

• Otra	alterna0va	a	conducir	y	volar.	

• Mejora	la	conec0vidad	y	coordinación	de	viajes	entre	los	

proveedores	de	servicio	de	trenes.	

• Acceso	ferroviario	a	los	aeropuertos	incluyendo	DFW,	Aus0n	y	

San	Antonio.	
Obje%vo	y	necesidad:	Sección	sur	

No	existen	servicios	de	tren	de	pasajeros	en	la	

actualidad:				

• Amtrak	provee	un	servicio	de	pasajeros	al	sur	de	San	Antonio	

mediante	autobuses.	

• Los	autobuses	proveen	la	mayor	parte	del	transporte	público	

interurbano	dentro	de	la	región	y	con	des0nos	en	los	EE.UU.	y	

México.	

• El	crecimiento	de	la	población	y	negocios	a	lo	largo	de	la	

frontera	está	aumentando		la	conges0ón,	par0cularmente	por	

los	camiones	comerciales.	

Algunas	necesidades	en	esta	sección:	

• Nuevas	opciones	para	viajes	interurbanos,	tal	como	trenes	de	

pasajeros,	que	no	aumenten	la	conges0ón	a	las	carreteras.

• Una	alterna0va	eficiente,	segura,	equita0va	y		asequible	a	las	

carreteras,	buses	o	viajes	en	avión.	

• Considerar	la	demanda	de	viajes	transfronterizos	hacia	

des0nos	mexicanos	tales	como	Monterrey,	un	centro	

importante	de	negocios	y	fuente	potencial	de	demanda	para	

trenes	de	pasajeros.	
Opciones	de	servicio	del	tren	de	pasajeros	

4 

Millas	

máximas/	

promedio	por	

hora	

Paradas/	

frecuencia	 Caracterís%cas	Jpicas	

Convencional		

(uso	las	vías	existentes)		

Máx.:		

70-90	mph	

Promedio:		

45-60	mph	

Paradas	a	15	a	60	

millas	de	distancia	

3-6	trenes/día	en	

cada	dirección	(no	

más	de	12)	

Asientos	no/reservados;	asientos	de	

clase	ejecu0va	limitados,	servicio	de	

cafetería	y	revisión	de	equipaje;	

locomotora	diésel.

Más	alta	velocidad		

(Algunas	vías	dedicadas)	

Máx.:		

110-125	mph	

Promedio:		

70-85	mph	

Se	de0ene	cada	30	

a	90	millas	de	

distancia	

4-8	trenes/día	en	

cada	dirección	

(tantos	como	12)	

Asientos	reservados;	asientos	de	clase	

ejecu0va	limitados,	servicio	de	café	y	

comidas,	equipaje	no	facturable,	por	

locomotora	diésel	y	eléctrica

Alta	velocidad

(sólo vías dedicadas)	

Máx.:		

165-220	mph	

Promedio:	

100-140	mph	

Paradas	a50	a	100+	

millas	de	distancia	

12-24	trenes/día	en	

cada	dirección	

Asientos	reservados;	asientos	clase	

ejecu0va;	servicio	de	cafetería	y	en	

cabina;	sin	revisión	de	equipaje,	

unidades	múl0ples	eléctricas	de	

locomoción.	

El	tren	de	pasajeros	da	servicio	a	múl>ples	ciudades	a	lo	largo	de	la	línea	ferroviaria,	

con	paradas	limitadas.	Puede	operar	a	dis>ntas	velocidades	y	frecuencias.	

Atributos	comunes:		Trenes	de	una	y	dos	plantas,	estaciones	con	estacionamiento,	operación	en	vías	existentes	o	dedicadas.	
Colorea los coches! Dibuje un tren para usted y sus 

Obtenga más infor
Color the cars! Draw a train for you and yo

Le
SCOPING REPORT 

Appendix E 

Public Scoping Comments – 

Agencies 

and Elected Officials 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

cover 1Appendix B 

Federal Agencies 

5/6/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&a=Open&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAA... 1/1

To: TXOKRAIL

Reply Reply All Forward

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

rebecca.littleowl@ibwc.gov

Tuesday, April 30, 2013 6:14 PM

Name: Mrs. Rebecca Little Owl<rebecca.littleowl@ibwc.gov>

Address:

4171 N. Mesa St.

C-100

El Paso, TX 79902

Phone:

(915) 832-4734

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: Please include the United States Section of the

International

Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) on the announcement of the

availability of the Draft Service Level EIS. The project corridor

may

cross USIBWC's Lower Rio Grande Flood Control Project in the

service areas

of McAllen and Harlingen.













Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

cover 1Appendix B 

State Agencies 

03/24/2013 R L Rushing Madill OK 73446

X

The more forms of transportation that are availabdegree of speed, will help commerce. The more and highway accidents. I rarely go to Dallas or Forail system needs more than one set of tracks goneeds to be more than one passenger train a day figure the controlling powers will squash this like highways and selling petroleum products.

04/10/2013 R. Preston Tom Bean TX 75489 X X X X X X All of the above apply but also, I would like to be 

the traffic, getting lost, having to drive in unfamili

04/10/2013 Rachel Maldonado Round Rock TX 78664-

6659 X X X X X

I understand that Texas is a big oil/ gas state. Hopeople would use public transportation more ofteconsideration not only as an environmental issuemeans to work and get where they need to be, th

04/10/2013 Rafael Hammett Dallas TX 75218 X X X X X X Texas badly needs a high speed rail across the s04/10/2013 Rajni Patel Irivng TX 75062 X X X X X X X We need to have few cars on the road as we are 

trasportation, more economical too.

04/11/2013 Ralph Galvan San Antonio TX 78201

X X X X X X X X

Our rail system is still stuck in the fifties and has and we have fallen behind, in comparison we are country is on the verge of stagnating in the 19th c

03/20/2013 Randi Eldevik Stillwater OK 74074 Several times over the years, I have traveled by t

Texas; I would like to be able to continue travelinTexas; I would like to be able to continue travelin

between Oklahoma City and Texas. I often go to 

03/31/2013 Randy Bear San Antonio TX 78207

X X

Leveraging passenger rail could potentially reducas improve the environment from an emissions pand Austin as much as possible. The conveniencsince I can also do work on the bus.

04/10/2013 Raymond Reed College Station TX 77840 X X X X X X X X We need rail transportation between cities to red04/10/2013 Rebecca Doll Wimberley TX 78676 X X X X I would like to see Texas lead the nation into rail 04/26/2013 Rebecca Fields Wichita KS 67208 X I am in support for TX to take further steps to adv

through Wichita and connect in Newton to the SW 

04/26/2013 Rep. Pete DeGraaf Kansas 

Representative

Mulvane KS 67110

X X

I would like to echo my support of expanding pasthe General Government Budget committee in thAppropriations committee. I and other representdeveloping a passenger rail partnership between extending the Heartland Flyer north from Oklahowould allow for productive business travel along allow the Heartland Flyer to connect with the alreinto Missouri and Colorado. The use of trains fability to connect existing rail service seems to munderstand that rail travel is restful and far more Oklahoma, and Kansas will work together in devebring the Hearland Flyer north through Guthrie, P

03/15/2013 Rev. Karl A. Claver Plano TX 75075

X X X X

Texas needs more passenger trains, and more roAmtrak is more fuel efficient and causes less polmore enrironment friendly when travelling by rail100 mph. Routes to Laredo, Brownsville,Corpus Midland), Dallas to Houston, and a route to DenvRocky Mountain State. Also the Heartland Flier nby constantly digging up LBJ freeway in Dallas, awiser solution. The price of gas is increasing, and to the Texas economy. Thank you..

04/26/2013 Rev. Robert 

Hemberger

Wichita KS 67202

X

Dear Committee: I write in support of pursuing TX to Kansas City. This is an idea whose time mthat would connect us in Wichita with the KC and inconvenient. 

04/03/2013 Ricardo A. Salinas Laredo TX 78043 I saw the study for the passenger rail service and 

would open up and change their routine of doing Texas and we had a great time. The most difficustay awake. The issue of having to wake up very and then drive back; as a father is mind bottling bcan work around providing families with a trip, wh

city on the way with rental cars accessibility or tra

it th ith t l ibilit t 

could work. I rather pay up to $200 for a family oget back safer and not having to fall asleep. With for an extra $50, I rather pay it and get some rest 

04/10/2013 Ricardo Martinez Edinburg TX 78541 X Great initiative, less people on roads = safer road











Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

cover 1Appendix B 

Local Agencies 

04/26/2013 Eve Atkinson - 

Comment part 1

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department

Oklahoma City, OK 73034

XX X X X

04/26/2013 Eve Atkinson - 

Comment part 2

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department

Oklahoma City, OK 73034 

XX X X X
04/26/2013 Eve Atkinson - 

Comment part 3

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department

Oklahoma City, OK 73034

XX X X X

04/26/2013 Eve Atkinson - 

Comment part 4

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department

Oklahoma City, OK 73034 

XX X X X
04/26/2013 Eve Atkinson - 

Comment part 5

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department

Oklahoma City, OK 73034

XX X X X

04/21/2013 Evelina Villareal 

Banyon

Rowlett, TX 75089

X

04/10/2013 Faith Chatham Arlington TX 76011

XX X

03/28/2013 Farah Bazzrea Wilson OK 73463

XX X X X X

04/10/2013 Felipe Pantoja Laredo TX 78046

X X X

04/10/2013 Flora batts Austin TX 78727

XX X

04/10/2013 Forrest R Thompson Lewisville TX 75067

X X

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Fran Sharpe Fran Sharpe Kingsville Kingsville TX 78363- 

4241

04/10/2013 Frances Hall Austin TX 78745 XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 frank stangel jr irving TX 75063 X 

04/10/2013 Franklin Blomquist Taylor TX 76574 04/11/2013 Franya Wilhelm Arlington TX 76012 XX X X X X 

04/25/2013 Fred E Diaz San Antonio TX 78212-

3548

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 F dR t b Fred Rusteberg B ill rownsville TX 78522 

X XX

04/10/2013 Fred Viehweg Austin TX 78725 X 



RESOLUTION NUMBER 2013-027 

A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of 

Brownsville Endorsing the Establishment of Passenger 

Rail Service to Brownsville, Texas 

WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Brownsville has determined that establishment 

of passenger rail service between San Antonio, Texas and Brownsville, Texas is needed to 

afford travel choices for residents of the lower Rio Grande Valley; and 

WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that proposed passenger rail service between 

Brownsville and San Antonio, Texas will promote both the general welfare and economic 

development of the Brownsville urbanized area; and 

WHEREAS, the City Commission recognizes that having passenger rail service available to 

evacuate elderly persons and persons with disabilities in the event of an approaching hurricane 

would serve the public interest and constitute an efficient and safe means of accommodating the 

special needs of these individuals; and 

WHEREAS, that the residents of South Texas will benefit from the economic development 

opportunities that will accrue due to increased tourism to this area by virtue of Passenger Rail 

services. 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Commission of the City of Brownsville 

endorses the establishment of needed passenger rail service to and from Brownsville, Texas. 

FURTHERMORE, City of Brownsville staff will forward this resolution to TxDOT staff as 

evidence of the need for such rail improvements, in connection with the on-going TexasOklahoma Passenger Rail Study. 

Approved this 16TH day of April 2013 

ATTEST: 

Est,la 

r!.tJiiv&vt 

Von Hatten ~ 

City Secretary 

Antonio Martinez 

Mayor 

04/01/2013 Pedro Paredes Jr Laredo TX 78041

X X

04/05/2013 Peggy Braswell Corpus Christi TX 78412 04/10/2013 Peggy Dean Dallas TX 75248 XX X X X 

04/10/2013 Peggy La Point Denton TX 76205

X

04/24/2013 Pete Meitzner Vice-Mayor Wichita 

City Council

Wichita KS 67202

X X X

04/10/2013 Peter Manchaca TX 78652

X X

04/11/2013 Peter Baughman San Antonio TX 78256 X X X X 04/16/2013 Peter LeCody Dallas TX 75226 

04/10/2013 Philip Kay Austin TX 78765 04/02/2013 Philip Krawczynski Belton TX 76513

X

04/02/2013 Phillip Davis Corpus Christi TX 78411 

X 

04/11/2013 Quentin Lucas Austin TX 78731

XX X X

4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVeb8AAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

mnewman@myspi.org

Sent:Monday, April 01, 2013 1:58 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Ms. Marcy Newman<mnewman@myspi.org>

Address:

City of South Padre Island

Public Works

4601 Padre Boulevard

South Padre Island, TX 78597

Phone:

(956) 761-3221

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: I would like to request a list of the stakeholders for the TXOK

High Speed Rail Study - those invited and those that attended the February

2013 stakeholder meeting on the project. Thanks.

04/01/2013 Lynn McCord San Antonio TX 78247

X

04/24/2013 Lynn Nichols Andover KS 67002 04/10/2013 M. RODRIGUEZ LAREDO TX 78040

X

04/10/2013 Mae newcombe Austin TX 78741 XX X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Maggi Joseph San Antonio TX 78228

XX X

04/18/2013 Manuela Gardner Corpus Christi TX 78418

X X X X X XX X X X X X 

04/11/2013 Marc Hoffman San Antonio TX 78258

XX X X X

04/10/2013 Marc W. McCord Celina TX 75009

XX X X X X X X

04/14/2013 Marcia Austin TX 78731 04/10/2013 Marcia Ingram McAllen TX 78503 X X X XX X 

04/01/2013 Marcy Newman South Padre Island TX 78597 X X 04/18/2013 Marcy Newman, 

Public Works Director, City of South Padre Island

South Padre Island TX 78597 

X X

04/10/2013 Margaret Caylor Marble Falls TX 78654 XX X X X X X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Margery Hunter Dallas TX 75223 XX X X X X X 

04/04/2013 Margie Garza Laredo TX 78041 

TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)

 1 MR. C. VILLARREAL: Good evening. Welcome

 2 to Laredo. I am Carlos Villarreal, Laredo City Manager.

 3 Thank you for the opportunity to make a few comments

 4 regarding the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study.

 5 In discussing high-speed passenger rail

 6 with Congressman Henry Cuellar today, he reminded me

 7 that part of the intent of the federal legislation

 8 regarding high-speed passenger rail was to include

 9 Laredo in a rail corridor.

 10 You may ask why Laredo should be included

 11 in a high-speed passenger rail project. The City of

 12 Laredo is the home of the largest, most-efficient inland

 13 port of entry on the U.S./Mexico border.

 14 In 2012, Laredo, Webb County, handled

 15 3,592,428 cross border truck crossings. That averages

 16 out to about 9,842 truck crosses a day. The port also

 17 handled in excess of 8,785,366 passenger vehicle

 18 crossings. The total number of vehicles that crossed

 19 through the bridge system in 2012 is in excess of

 20 12 million.

 21 There are more than 830 trade handling and

 22 transportation-related businesses in Laredo, Webb

 23 County, Texas. Current trade numbers show that Laredo

 24 is ranked sixth of all ports in the United States and

 25 the only one to have double-digit growth out of all of



 3

 1 the district.

 2 The significance of the flow of commerce

Page 1
TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)

 3 through Laredo is not just a local or state issue. It

 4 has been recognized at the highest levels of the federal

 5 government as being in the national interest. The need

 6 to keep up with the ever-increasing flow of

 7 international trade through Laredo, Webb County, clearly

 8 outpaces the funding that is available.

 9 I see high-speed passenger rail as

 10 offering many benefits to Laredo, Webb County, the state

 11 of Texas and the nation. High-speed passenger rail is a

 12 way to further promote and stimulate trade and tourism

 13 with Mexico. It offers a safe, convenient and

 14 comfortable way to travel.

 15 High-speed passenger rail delivers a new

 16 mobility which would relieve congestion on the state

 17 highway system and reduce state highway maintenance

 18 costs. Rail also offers a reduced impact on the

 19 environment thereby preserving air quality.

 20 High-speed passenger rail would be an

 21 economic boon to south Texas by creating hundreds, if

 22 not thousands, of jobs building rail infrastructure and

 23 maintaining and possibly manufacturing rail cars.

 24 In closing, it is obvious to those of us

 25 in Laredo, a city which has no air service to San



 4

 1 Antonio or Austin, that high-speed passenger rail would

 2 fill this transportation gap. It would also complement

 3 the flow of traffic between Nuevo Laredo and Monterrey.

 4 Finally, it would enhance and benefit international

 5 trade and commerce between the United States, Mexico and

Page 2
TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)

 6 points south.

 7 The City of Laredo supports a high-speed

 8 passenger rail project in south Texas and is

 9 geographically the best suited to handle future

 10 passenger rail service. Thank you.

 1 COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATION

 2 

 3 COUNTY OF BEXAR)

 4 STATE OF TEXAS )

 5 

 6 I, Dicie Lee Eytcheson, a Certified

 7 Shorthand Reporter in and for the State of Texas, do

 8 hereby certify that this transcript is as true and

 9 accurate a record as possible, transcribed by me through

 10 computer-aided transcription.

 11 And further certify that I am not a

 12 relative or employee of any of the parties hereto, nor

 13 interested directly or indirectly in the outcome of this

 14 session.

 15 WITNESS MY HAND, this the ______________

 16 day of ________________, A.D. 2013.

 17 

 18 

 19 _______________________________

 20 Dicie Lee Eytcheson, Texas CSR 5392

 Expiration Date: 12/31/14

 21 Firm Registration No. 631

 Kim Tindall & Associates, LLC

 22 645 Lockhill Selma, Suite 200

 San Antonio, Texas 78216

 23 Phone: (210) 697-3400

 Fax: (210) 697-3408

 24 

 25 

Page 3
TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)



Page 4
04/10/2013 Alexander Solano Fort Worth TX 76140

XX X X

04/18/2013 Alfred McInturff Midlothian TX 76065/4

723 XX X 

04/14/2013 Alfredo Torres Jr. Laredo TX 78045 04/17/2013 Alicea Campos San Antonio TX 78240

X X

04/23/2013 Alicia Winkelblech Arlington TX 76010

X X X

04/10/2013 Alina Aqeel Allen TX 75002 X X 

04/10/2013 Allison Chambers Watauga TX 76148

XX X X X X

04/12/2013 Allison Kaplan Austin TX 78752 X 

04/23/2013 Alta Monroe South Padre Island 78597

X

04/10/2013 Alyssa Burgin San Antonio TX 78258

XX X

04/10/2013 Amanda Mattle Dallas TX 75214

X X

04/10/2013 Amy Austin TX 78723 XX X X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Amy Abeyta San Antonio TX 78209 04/10/2013 Amy Birdwell Garland TX 75043 X 04/10/2013 Amy Hufford Austin TX 78757

X

04/10/2013 Amy Hunt Austin TX 78749

X

04/10/2013 Amy Pancake Austin TX 78745 XX X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Amy Partin San Marcos TX 78666

X XX

04/10/2013 Andrew L. Grohe San Antonio TX 78212

XX X

04/10/2013 Andrew Nguyen Austin TX 78750 X X X X X X 

SCOPING REPORT 

Appendix F 

Public Scoping Comments – 

Tribes 

The Delaware Nation 

Cultural Preservation Office 

P.O. Box 825 - 31064 State Highway 281- Anadarko, OK 73005 

Phone: 405/247-2448 – Fax: 405/247-8905 

NAGPRA ext. 1180

Section 106 ext. 1181

Museum ext. 1181

Library ext. 1196

Clerk ext. 1182

April 23, 2013

RE: Invitation to Participate in Section 106 Consultation for 

Tier 1 EIS for the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Corridor,

South Texas to Oklahoma City

Dear Mr. David Valenstein,

Thank you for consulting with the Delaware Nation. We appreciate your willingness to conduct proper 

consultation with our nation. We received your letter regarding the above referenced project on April 

23, 2013. Upon examination we are interested in these areas. Therefore, we will be a consulting party. 

Please send further project plans along with cultural resource surveys to our offices and set up a 

meeting date for the month of June.

Should you have any questions regarding this email or future consultation feel free to contact our offices 

at 405-247-2448 or by email tfrancis@delawarenation.com.

Sincerely, 

Mrs. Tamara Francis Fourkiller

Cultural Preservation Director

CC: Nikki Ahtone (Assistant Director) 

nahtone@delawarenation.com
From: Mark Werner

To: Walbrun, Mark/DFW; Hausknecht, Brian/SDO; Green, John/HCH

Cc: Hull, Kristin/PDX

Subject: FW: Federal Railroad Adminstration, EIS for Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Corridor, South TX to OKC

Date: Friday, April 19, 2013 7:06:04 AM

First response from the Tribal letters. Similar request to what the resource agencies were asking

for.

From: Johnnie L. Jacobs [mailto:jjacobs@choctawnation.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 8:59 AM

To: catherine.dobbs@dot.gov; Mark Werner

Subject: Federal Railroad Adminstration, EIS for Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Corridor, South

TX to OKC

Dear Ms. Dobbs and Mr. Werner,

Thank you for the correspondence regarding the above referenced project. The Choctaw Nation of

Oklahoma has historic interest in various parts of Texas and Oklahoma. In order for us to more

thoroughly evaluate our area of interest in relation to this project for NHPA Section 106 review, we

would like to request that you send our office a copy of the GIS project line shapefile so that we can

do further examination. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Thank you,

Ms. Johnnie Jacobs

NHPA Section 106 Coordinator

Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma

Historic Preservation Department

P.O. Box 1210

Durant, OK 74701

jjacobs@choctawnation.com

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is

privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified that we do not

consent to any reading, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message. If you have received this communication in error,

please notify the sender immediately and destroy the transmitted information. Please note that any view or opinions presented in this

email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Choctaw Nation.

Talk. Text. Crash.
SCOPING REPORT 

Appendix G 

Public Scoping Comments – 

Organizations, Businesses, and 

Individuals 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

cover 1Appendix B 

Open House Comments 

































































































































Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

cover 1Appendix B 

On-line Comments 

Date contact information 

Name Organization: City State ZIP Noise Air 

quality 

Human health

Traffic or safety

Other human environment topic

Wildlife or vegetation 

Wetlands or streams

Water quality

Other natural environment topic

Alternatives Area of 

potential effect

EIS/ regulatory process

Other Eprocess topic

04/07/2013 A. D. Simmons Marianna FL 32447

X X

04/19/2013 Aaron Addison Fort Worth TX 76177 

Human environment Natural environment EIS process

04/19/2013 Aaron Addison Fort Worth TX 76177

XX X X X X X

04/10/2013 Aaron Mathis SAN ANTONIO TX 78216 X X X 

04/10/2013 ADAM 

SWIERCZYNSKI

DENTON TX 76209 XX X X X X 

04/11/2013 Adrea Craft Austin TX 78745 04/10/2013 Adriana de la Cruz Laredo TX 78046

X X X

04/05/2013 Adrianne Harper Spiro OK 74959 04/10/2013 aida cadena SAN ANTONIO TX 78228 X 04/10/2013 aida cadena SAN ANTONIO TX 78228 

X 

04/19/2013 Aimee Leisy Wichita KS 67211

X

04/10/2013 Ajay Jain Garland TX 75044 X 04/03/2013 alan stowers corpus christi TX 78418 X 04/10/2013 Alex Araiza San Antonio TX 78230 X X 

04/02/2013 Alex Hernandez San Antonio TX 78245 

X

04/10/2013 Alex 

Vlahodimitropoulos

Austin TX 78701 XX X X X X X 
04/10/2013 Alexander Solano Fort Worth TX 76140

XX X X

04/18/2013 Alfred McInturff Midlothian TX 76065/4

723 XX X 

04/14/2013 Alfredo Torres Jr. Laredo TX 78045 04/17/2013 Alicea Campos San Antonio TX 78240

X X

04/23/2013 Alicia Winkelblech Arlington TX 76010

X X X

04/10/2013 Alina Aqeel Allen TX 75002 X X 

04/10/2013 Allison Chambers Watauga TX 76148

XX X X X X

04/12/2013 Allison Kaplan Austin TX 78752 X 

04/23/2013 Alta Monroe South Padre Island 78597

X

04/10/2013 Alyssa Burgin San Antonio TX 78258

XX X

04/10/2013 Amanda Mattle Dallas TX 75214

X X

04/10/2013 Amy Austin TX 78723 XX X X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Amy Abeyta San Antonio TX 78209 04/10/2013 Amy Birdwell Garland TX 75043 X 04/10/2013 Amy Hufford Austin TX 78757

X

04/10/2013 Amy Hunt Austin TX 78749

X

04/10/2013 Amy Pancake Austin TX 78745 XX X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Amy Partin San Marcos TX 78666

X XX

04/10/2013 Andrew L. Grohe San Antonio TX 78212

XX X

04/10/2013 Andrew Nguyen Austin TX 78750 X X X X X X 
04/20/2013 Andrew Philbin college station TX 77845

X

04/10/2013 Andrew Preisler Grapevine TX 76051 XX X X X X X X 

04/19/2013 Angela Graveline Austin TX 78751 04/10/2013 Angelica Brehm Austin TX 78704

X X X

04/10/2013 Anita Duffy Hillsboro TX 76645

XX X

04/10/2013 Anita Gebhardt Dallas TX 75228

X X

04/10/2013 Anita McAuley San Antonio TX 78233

XX X

04/10/2013 Anita Mills Dallas TX 75208

XX X

04/10/2013 Ann Pennington Arlington TX 76001 XX X 

04/10/2013 ann vanderlaan round rock TX 78664

X X

04/03/2013 Anna Jimenez Laredo TX 78045 04/11/2013 Annalisa Peace San Antonio TX 78215 

X X

04/12/2013 Anne Burnham Austin TX 78701 X X X 

04/10/2013 anne mongere lewisville TX 75077 X 04/12/2013 Anthony McCradic Grand Prairie TX 75050

X

03/14/2013 Anthony Stolfa McKinney TX 75070 

XX X X X X X X X
04/11/2013 antonio melchor kirby TX 78219 

04/10/2013 Ariana Klugiewicz Corpus Christi TX 78412 XX X X X X X X X X 

04/11/2013 Arlo Austin TX 78758 04/02/2013 Arminda DeHoyos Laredo TX 78043 04/10/2013 Arturo Gonzales San Antonio TX 78218-

2036 X X X X

03/18/2013 Audrey Rand Hutto TX 78634 

04/10/2013 bailey austin TX 78751 XX X X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Barbara Attwell Austin TX 78733

XX X X

04/11/2013 Barbara Gettelman Austin TX 78704 X 

04/19/2013 Barbara MacAlpine San Antonio TX 78212

X X

04/04/2013 Barry Robert Benton Brownsville TX 78520-

8014

04/02/2013 Barry Robert Benton Brownsville TX 78520-

8014

X X X

04/10/2013 Bart Bombay Austin TX 78746

XX X X X X

04/10/2013 Bart Bombay Austin TX 78746 

XX X X X X
04/10/2013 Beatriz von Ohlen Brownsville TX 78521 XX X X X X X X 

04/04/2013 Ben Lawrence Bonham TX 75418 04/10/2013 Benito A. Bondoc Jr. Laredo TX 78041 X 04/05/2013 Benjamin Worsham Edinburg TX 78542

X

04/10/2013 Bernadette Monaghan Bedford TX 76021 X 

04/10/2013 Bernie Zahn Richardson TX 75080

XX X X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Beth Cullen San Antonio TX 78240 XX X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Beth Meyers Carrollton TX 75010 03/31/2013 Beth Sperling Edmond OK 73012 X 04/10/2013 Bethany Sautter Austin TX 78704 X X 

04/14/2013 Bettye Short Austin TX 78745

X

04/10/2013 Beverly T. Corpus Christi TX 78411

X XX X X X

04/11/2013 Beverly Wunderlin Coppell TX 75019 XX X X X X 

04/20/2013 Bill Carter Austin TX 78741

XX X

04/10/2013 Bill Sakach Austin TX 78733

X X

04/10/2013 Bill Schas Helotes TX 78023

X X XX

04/13/2013 Blair Fawcett Houston TX 77006

XX X X
04/10/2013 Bob Waldrop Oklahoma City OK 73106 XX X 

04/10/2013 BobMurry Corpus TX 78418 X X 04/10/2013 Bonnie Johnston Bryan TX 77802-

3603

04/23/2013 Bonnie Winslow Guthrie OK 73044

X

04/10/2013 brad eddins austin TX 78749 X 

04/24/2013 Brad Harzman Emporia KS 66801 X X 

03/28/2013 Brad McCaleb

XX X

04/10/2013 Brandon Kelly Garland TX 75044 X X X X 

04/02/2013 Brannon Kroll San Antonio 78205

X

03/19/2013 03/19/2013 Braynard H Werner III Braynard H Werner III Houston Houston TX 77006 

X

03/19/2013 Braynard H Werner III Houston TX 77006

X

04/01/2013 Brenda barozinski Sand Springs OK 74063

X

04/10/2013 Brenda Estrada-Berg San Antonio TX 78230

XX X X

04/12/2013 Brenda Joyas Brownsville TX 78526

XX X X X X

04/10/2013 Brenda Presley Austin TX 78759 X 

04/10/2013 BRENDA TANNER FAIRVIEW TX 75069 X X X X X 04/16/2013 brenda thomas corpus christi TX 78411 
04/20/2013 Brendon Wichita KS 67217

X

04/10/2013 Brent Bray Pflugerville TX 78660-

2318

X X

04/10/2013 Brian Bentley Denton TX 76209 XX X X X X X X X 

04/01/2013 Brian Paris Malakoff TX 75148

X

04/10/2013 Brian Schill Spring Branch TX 78070-

3327

XX X X X

04/10/2013 Brooke Bailey Austin TX 78703

X X X XX X X X 

04/10/2013 brooke werner anna TX 75409 04/10/2013 Brownsville Chamber 

of Commerce

Brownsville TX 78520

X X

04/10/2013 Bruny Harlingen TX 78552 X X 

04/24/2013 Bub Osten Eufaula OK 74432

X

04/10/2013 Byron Pratt Austin TX 78701

X

04/10/2013 C E Saunier Pflugerville TX 78660 g 

XX X X X X X X X

04/11/2013 Caleb Etheredge San Antonio TX 78204 XX X X X X 

04/05/2013 camden Oklahoma City OK 731369 XX X X X X 
03/25/2013 Cameron Brewer Norman OK 73069 

04/13/2013 Camille Drinan Fort Worth TX 76135

X X

04/10/2013 Candace Baker Laredo TX 78045

XX X X X

03/27/2013 Carey Maynard- Lawrence KS 66044 y y 

Moody X X

04/01/2013 Carl Lehman San Antonio TX 78222

X

04/04/2013 carmen LAREDO TX 78045

X X

04/10/2013 Carmen Bell Austin TX 78723 X 04/10/2013 Carol Austin TX 78768

XX X

04/16/2013 Carol Baldwin Corpus Christi TX 78402 X XX 

04/23/2013 Carol Brashear Round Rock TX 78664

X 

04/15/2013 Carol Creech Fort Worth TX 76112

XX X X

04/10/2013 Carol Fulton San Antonio TX 78249

X

04/11/2013 Carole Sparks Cameron TX 76520

X X X XX X

04/12/2013 Caroline Vornberg Garland TX 75043 X X 04/10/2013 Carolyn Kendrick Fort Worth TX 76244 04/03/2013 Carolyn Leyendecker Laredo TX 78041 04/03/2013 Carolyn Moon Corpus Christi TX 78411 
04/13/2013 Carolyn Semrow Hearne TX 77859

X

04/02/2013 Carolyn W Bennett Belton TX 76513

X X

04/10/2013 Carrie Evans Austin TX 78722 

04/12/2013 04/12/2013 Carrie Meyer Corpus Christi T C iM C Ch i ti TX 78402 

04/10/2013 Catherine Cazabon Dallas TX 75228

XX X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 catherine portele Garland TX 75042 XX X X X X X 

04/11/2013 Cathy Plasencia San Antonio TX 78210

X

04/10/2013 Cecilia Kuhn Dallas TX 75214 X 04/11/2013 CESAR RIVERA SAN ANTONIO TX 78212

XX X X X X X X

03/18/2013 Chad Davis Decatur TX 76234

XX X X X

04/03/2013 Chad Magill Corpus Christi TX 78411 04/24/2013 Chad Stafford Wichita KS 67226

X

04/10/2013 Chalda Maloff Austin TX 78759 X X 

04/10/2013 Charlene Gagon austin TX 78704 

03/27/2013 Charles Crooks Allen TX 75002 X 04/01/2013 Charles Dube Dallas TX 75209

X XX X
04/11/2013 Charles Foreman Arlington TX 76011 

03/26/2013 Charles Fox Denton TX 76209

X

04/05/2013 Charles S. Smith Villisca IA 50864 04/11/2013 Charles Shamel Rockport TX 78382 04/16/2013 Charlie Craig Driftwood TX 78619

XX X X X

04/11/2013 Charlotte A. Barker Lagua Vista TX 78578-

2671

X X X

04/10/2013 Cheri Long Pflugerville TX 78660 04/17/2013 Cheryl Brown-Raines Garland TX 75043

XX X X

04/10/2013 Cheryl C Gardner Bedford TX 76021

XX X

04/10/2013 cheryl kester Denton TX 76206 X X X X X X X X X 03/26/2013 Chris Hornsby Austin TX 78757 X 04/10/2013 Chris Kugler Sanger TX 76266-

7191 XX X X X 

04/04/2013 Chris Mashek Belton TX 76513

X

04/05/2013 Chris McCullough Oklahoma City OK 73102

X

04/10/2013 chris schwedes college station TX 77840

X

04/11/2013 Chris Stubbs San Antonio TX 78210

X XX X

03/31/2013 Chris Z Corpus Christi TX 78418 04/16/2013 Christa French Austin TX 78757 
04/10/2013 Christiaan Siano Austin TX 78723

X X

04/11/2013 CHRISTIAN CANO PLANO TX 75023

XX X X

04/10/2013 Christian Weehler San Antonio TX 78217 X X X X X 04/10/2013 Christina Simpson Austin TX 78733 XX X X 

04/10/2013 Christina Wolfe Austin TX 78703 X X 04/10/2013 Christine C. Baeza Laredo TX 78046 04/10/2013 Christine Rodgers Tulsa OK 74120 

XX X X X

04/10/2013 Christine Shelton Denton TX 76209 04/26/2013 Christopher Riggs Wichita KS 67203 04/12/2013 christopher tuch new braunfels TX 78130 X 

04/10/2013 Chrysteen Shafer Austin TX 78749

X X

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Chuck Ables Chuck Ables BELTON TX 76513 

XX X X X X X X X X 

04/06/2013 Chuck DiFalco League City TX 04/10/2013 Chuck Norton Denton TX 76201

XX X

04/10/2013 Cindy Brittain Salado TX 76571

XX X X

04/10/2013 Claire Barrett Austin TX 78722 X X 

04/11/2013 Claud Bramblett Austin TX 78751 XX X X X X X 

03/28/2013 clay hunn Austin TX 78723

X XX
04/11/2013 Clinton Chamberlain Dallas TX 75224

XX X X

04/11/2013 Colleen Garland Austin TX 78749

XX X

04/10/2013 Connie Curtis Austin TX 78758 X 

04/25/2013 Constanza Rodriguez Mcallen TX 78501

X

04/23/2013 Craig Brownsville TX 78526 

04/07/2013 Craig Rogers Corpus Christi TX 78418 04/04/2013 Craig Whitacre Oklahoma City OK 73116

X

04/10/2013 Crystal Crow Sherman TX 75092 04/16/2013 Crystal Hughes Dallas TX 75243

X

04/10/2013 Cyndi Ferris Austin TX 78754

X X

04/10/2013 Cynthia A Riley Austin TX 78745 X X 

04/10/2013 Cynthia Beard Denton TX 76210

XX X

04/10/2013 Cynthia Curtis Garland TX 75044

XX X

04/10/2013 D. Schoech Arlington TX 76012

X X

04/11/2013 D.D. Bulla Austin TX 78750 

X

04/25/2013 Dagoberto Zavala Weslaco TX 78596 04/10/2013 Dale Bulla Austin 78750-

7932 X X X X X X X X X
04/04/2013 Dale Davis Bonham TX 75418 

04/10/2013 Dan King Cedar Park TX 78613-

2941 X X X X

04/10/2013 Dan Nolan Fort worth TX 76112 X X X X X X 04/10/2013 Dana Buda TX 78610 04/11/2013 Dana Crawford Austin TX 78727 XX X 

04/11/2013 dana donald pflugrrville TX 78660 XX X X X X X X X 

04/26/2013 Daniel Edinburg TX 78541

X

03/16/2013 03/16/2013 Daniel Da D i lD y S At ian nono TX 78202 

03/29/2013 Daniel Nickels Corpus Christi TX 78412 X X 

04/10/2013 Daniel Perlaky Austin TX 78745 XX X 

04/19/2013 Danielle Heine Wichita KS 67217 X 

04/04/2013 Daphne McKinney Laredo TX 78045

X X

04/10/2013 Darel Parker McAllen TX 78504 

04/10/2013 Darling Tiffer-Violett San Antonio TX 78230

XX X X X X X

04/12/2013 Dave 04/10/2013 David Austin TX 78746

X

04/10/2013 David austin TX 78724

X XX

04/10/2013 David Altmeyer Sachse TX 75048 X X 

04/10/2013 David Art Austin TX 78703 

X X X XX X

04/07/2013 David Awtrey Ponca city OK 74604

X
04/24/2013 David Babich Wichita KS 67226

X

04/10/2013 David Braun San Antonio TX 78247 X X XX 

04/10/2013 David Brenner Austin TX 78731

X

04/24/2013 David Burk Wichita KS 67202

XX X

04/24/2013 David Burk Wichita KS 67202

XX X

04/10/2013 David Chapa Laredo TX 78045

X X

04/04/2013 David De La Rosa Dallas TX 75229

X X

04/26/2013 David Dickerson Edmond OK 73012 

X XX X

04/12/2013 DAVID FERGUSON CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78418

XX X

04/10/2013 David Fitzgerald San Antonio TX 78240 04/10/2013 DAVID JOHANSSON Austin TX 78717

XX X X

03/30/2013 David Lacy Waco TX 76703

X
04/10/2013 David Maduzia Austin TX 78703

XX X X X X

04/10/2013 David Osborne Hurst TX 76054 04/11/2013 David P. Perales Laredo TX 78045

X

04/12/2013 David R Durham Austin TX 78727 

04/10/2013 David Todd Austin TX 78704 XX X X 

04/02/2013 David Williams San Antonio TX 78209

X

04/10/2013 David Wood San Antonio TX 78245 XX X X X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Dawn Killian College Station TX 77840 X X 04/10/2013 Deanne Lachner McKinney TX 75070 X 04/10/2013 Deaton Bednar Austin TX 78751 X 

04/10/2013 Debbra Aiken Coppell TX 75019 XX X X 

04/07/2013 debir rushing sherman TX 75090 XX X 

04/13/2013 04/13/2013 Deborah Deborah Austin TX 78745 

X X 

04/24/2013 Deborah Fischer Stout Overland Park KS 66213 XX X X X 

04/15/2013 Deborah L. Sizemore Crowley TX 76036

X X

04/10/2013 Debra Gent Heartland TX 75126 X 

04/11/2013 Debra Steele Austin TX 78753 04/10/2013 Dee Ann Novoa Laredo TX 78045 04/01/2013 Deidra Lujan frisco TX 75035 

X X 
04/10/2013 Denise Crettenden Seguin TX 78155

X

04/22/2013 Dennis Hodapp Wichita KS 67205 04/04/2013 Dennis McCrea Laredo TX 78041

X X

04/10/2013 Dennis Ware Plano TX 75075

X X

03/14/2013 Derrick Rand Dallas TX 75227 

XX X

04/10/2013 Diana Bridges San Antonio TX 78255 X X 

04/26/2013 Diana Cubbage Wichita KS 67212

X

04/19/2013 Diana Mitchell Wichita KS 67211 04/10/2013 Diana Wheeler Austin TX 78731

X X

04/10/2013 Diane Prodger San Antonio TX 78216

X X

04/11/2013 Dick Kallerman Austin TX 78704 04/11/2013 Dick Yates The Colony TX 75056 XX X X X X 

04/11/2013 Dolores Campos Laredo TX 78043 X 

04/02/2013 Don Ferguson san antonio TX 78260 X 

04/10/2013 Donna Maxwell Denton TX 76201 X 

04/10/2013 Donna Rose Austin TX 78757

XX X

04/10/2013 Donna Turman Dallas TX 75214

X

04/10/2013 Douglas Chadwick Aubrey TX 76227 X X 
03/26/2013 Dr. Cristian Bratu Waco TX 76712 

04/11/2013 Earl Eubanks San Antonio TX 78217

X XX

04/10/2013 Ed Adams Dallas TX 75209 X X X X X X X 04/10/2013 Eddie Hartman Murphy TX 75094

X

04/10/2013 Eddy E. Hernandez Brownsville TX 78523

X X

04/02/2013 04/02/2013 Eden Boerne TX 78006 

04/11/2013 Edgar and Cinda Pace San Antonio TX 78247

X X

04/10/2013 edna lopez austin TX 78736

X X

04/01/2013 Edward Trevino Laredo TX 78041 04/10/2013 Elaine Betterton Austin TX 78728 

X

04/11/2013 Elaine Blodgett McDade TX 78650 X 

04/10/2013 Elaine Hobbs Round Rock TX 78665

X X X

04/03/2013 Elena Buentello Corpus Christi TX 78401 04/10/2013 Elise Johnston Dallas TX 75287

XX X X X

04/15/2013 Elizabeth Cook Carrollton TX 75010 X 

04/16/2013 Elizabeth G. Craig Driftwood TX X X X X X 04/11/2013 Elizabeth McGlasson Austin TX 78748 
04/10/2013 Ellen B. Smith Austin TX 78757

X

04/10/2013 Ellen Mass Corpus Christi TX 78410

X X

04/10/2013 ELSA WINSETT LAREDO TX 78046 04/10/2013 Emily Alpert Brownsville TX 78520 

04/10/2013 Emily Brannon Ferris TX 75125

X X

04/10/2013 Emily Maker Austin TX 78745 X 

04/10/2013 Emily McKaskle Austin TX 78733 XX X X X 

04/10/2013 Emily Northrop Georgetown TX 78626 XX X X X X 

04/11/2013 Emily Potts Austin TX 78741

X X X XX

03/14/2013 Eric Thurstin Dallas TX 75223 

04/26/2013 eric weinberg wichita KS 67217 04/11/2013 Eric Whitney Austin TX 78736-

1822

XX X X X X X X
04/10/2013 Erick Bogholtz Austin TX 78729 X 

04/10/2013 Erin Austin TX 78752

X X

04/10/2013 Erin Hunt Carrollton TX 75006

X X

04/11/2013 Erin McClure Fort Worth TX 76114 04/10/2013 Estela Quintanilla Laredo TX 78041

X

04/13/2013 Estevan Puente Fort Worth TX 76112 

X XX

04/10/2013 Eugene Acosta Fort Worth TX 76110

XX X X

04/26/2013 Evan Stair Norman OK 73069

X X
04/26/2013 Eve Atkinson - 

Comment part 1

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department

Oklahoma City, OK 73034

XX X X X

04/26/2013 Eve Atkinson - 

Comment part 2

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department

Oklahoma City, OK 73034 

XX X X X
04/26/2013 Eve Atkinson - 

Comment part 3

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department

Oklahoma City, OK 73034

XX X X X

04/26/2013 Eve Atkinson - 

Comment part 4

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department

Oklahoma City, OK 73034 

XX X X X
04/26/2013 Eve Atkinson - 

Comment part 5

Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department

Oklahoma City, OK 73034

XX X X X

04/21/2013 Evelina Villareal 

Banyon

Rowlett, TX 75089

X

04/10/2013 Faith Chatham Arlington TX 76011

XX X

03/28/2013 Farah Bazzrea Wilson OK 73463

XX X X X X

04/10/2013 Felipe Pantoja Laredo TX 78046

X X X

04/10/2013 Flora batts Austin TX 78727

XX X

04/10/2013 Forrest R Thompson Lewisville TX 75067

X X

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Fran Sharpe Fran Sharpe Kingsville Kingsville TX 78363- 

4241

04/10/2013 Frances Hall Austin TX 78745 XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 frank stangel jr irving TX 75063 X 

04/10/2013 Franklin Blomquist Taylor TX 76574 04/11/2013 Franya Wilhelm Arlington TX 76012 XX X X X X 

04/25/2013 Fred E Diaz San Antonio TX 78212-

3548

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 F dR t b Fred Rusteberg B ill rownsville TX 78522 

X XX

04/10/2013 Fred Viehweg Austin TX 78725 X 
04/23/2013 Freddy Hernandez Brownsville TX 78521

X X

04/10/2013 g gunsalus lakeway TX 78734 XX X X 

04/11/2013 Gabriel Kirkpatrick Denton TX 76207

X XX

04/10/2013 Gabriel Rodriguez Laredo TX 78041 X 04/11/2013 Gabriel Ruiz Laredo TX 78043

X

04/10/2013 Gabrielle O'Day 

Laufman

Flower Mound TX 75022

X X X X XX X X X X 

04/11/2013 gail gibbons austin TX 78704 X X 

04/12/2013 galia pflugerville TX 78660

XX X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Gary Schertz TX 78154 X X 

04/10/2013 Gary L. Childress Corpus Christi TX 78418

XX X X X X X

03/26/2013 Gary Lanman Ponca City OK 74604 

X X

04/10/2013 Gayle Borst Austin TX 78703 XX X 

04/10/2013 Gaylynn Clevenger Driftwood TX 78619 X 

04/06/2013 Genest Landry Oklahoma city OK 73107

X

04/01/2013 George Booth San Antonio TX 78213 03/27/2013 George Bowen Ardmore OK 73401 X 04/01/2013 GEORGE GARCIA LAREDO TX 78040

XX X X X X X X X X X

04/02/2013 George Gould Lamarque TX 77568 X 

04/12/2013 george schriever san antonio TX 78218 XX X X X X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 George Wilcox Austin TX 78757

XX X
04/02/2013 georgio graf belton TX 76513

X X

04/10/2013 Geraldine Mongold Austin TX 78745

X X

04/10/2013 Gerry Salinas, Jr. Laredo TX 78041 

XX X X

04/14/2013 GibbonsM.C. Dallas TX 75229 04/10/2013 Gil G. Garcia Corpus Christi TX 78414 X 04/10/2013 gill richards dallas TX 75202

X X

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Gina Treuter Gina Treuter Austin TX 78739 

XX X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Giri Akkaraju Fort Worth TX 76116 04/16/2013 Giselle Rackley Universal City TX 78148 X X 04/03/2013 GLORIA 

HERNANDEZ

OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73109 

04/11/2013 Gloria Muchler New Braunfels TX 78131

X XX X

04/10/2013 Gloria Osborn Seguin TX 78155 X X X X X X X X X X 04/10/2013 Gordon Bourland Arlington TX 76016

XX X

04/10/2013 Gordon MacAlpine San Antonio TX 78232 XX X X X X X X X X X X X 

04/04/2013 Gracie Medina Laredo TX 78045 

X
03/14/2013 Greg Fry Gainesville TX 76240

X

04/15/2013 Gregory Pasztor san antonio TX 78209-

3317 XX X X

04/10/2013 Gregory Wayland New Braunfels TX 78130

XX X X X X X X X

04/05/2013 Gretchen Arnold Corpus Christi TX 78404 

XX X X X

04/10/2013 Guillermo R. Ugalde, 

Jr.

Laredo TX 78046

X

04/10/2013 Gus Sr Chavarria Mansfield TX 76063 XX X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 gwen sederholm gwen sederholm austin TX 78759 

XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 h. keith mephodie 

sterzing

Cedar Park TX 78613-

3465 XX X X X X X 

04/26/2013 hank harvey Parkville MO 64192 X X X X X X X X X 04/10/2013 Hans Laven SAN ANTONIO TX 78212-

2977 XX X X X X X X X X X X X 

04/20/2013 Harold Farrier Wichita KS 67203 
03/16/2013 Harvey Kahler Chicago IL 60645

X

04/10/2013 Heather I. Sullivan San Antonio TX 78216-

1927 XX X X X X X

04/10/2013 Heather Joy Thomas Austin TX 78704 XX X 

04/10/2013 Heather Lerch OK 73107

X

04/11/2013 Heinz and Margaret 

Aeschbach

TX 78704 

X

04/10/2013 Helen Elkins Georgetown TX 78628

X X

04/12/2013 herbert keener dallas TX 75243

X

04/25/2013 Hilary Young Austin TX 78746

X X

04/10/2013 Holly Pritchard Luling TX 78648

XX X X X X X X

04/12/2013 Homero Prado Jr. Laredo TX 78040

X

04/10/2013 howard robinson grapevine TX 76051 XX X X X X X X 

04/02/2013 Humberto Alvarez Weslaco TX 78596

X X
04/03/2013 Ida Chamberlain Laredo TX 78045 

04/01/2013 Imelda Zapata TX 78076 04/11/2013 Inelda Z. Gonzalez Harlingen TX 78552 X X 04/10/2013 Isabel DelatorreHansen Brownsville TX 78521- 5633 X XX 04/10/2013 Isabel Wood San Antonio TX 78232 X 04/10/2013 Iva L Riddle Arlington TX 76010 X 

04/10/2013 j powers fort worth TX 76107

XX X

04/23/2013 J R Meschi South Padre Island TX 78597

X

04/04/2013 J. R. Price Fort Worth TX 76109-

3535

X X

04/10/2013 Jaclyn watters Austin, TX TX 78705

XX X X X X

03/26/2013 Jacob Gaslin McAllen TX 78504

XX X X

04/11/2013 Jacquelyn Linn Whitney TX 76692 04/10/2013 Jacquline Parker-Boyd Austin TX 78753 X X X 

04/10/2013 Jade Segura Longview TX 75605 X X 

04/01/2013 JAIME R. OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73112 04/11/2013 Jake D Sitters Castroville TX 78009 
04/10/2013 James A. Wright Hurst TX 76054

XX X X X X X

04/15/2013 James Bordonaro Emporia KS 66801

X X

04/24/2013 James D. Maynard Bristow OK 74010 04/10/2013 James Dowis Austin TX 78746

XX X

04/10/2013 James E Wiggins Dallas TX 75218

X X

04/10/2013 James Kaufmann El Paso TX 79902

X X

04/04/2013 James Klein Corpus Christi TX 78411 X X 04/12/2013 James Lee Arlington TX 76017

X

04/10/2013 James McDonald Austin TX 78703 XX X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 James R Blount San Antonio TX 78229-

5049 XX X X X X X

04/13/2013 James Soper Austin TX 78764 X X X X X X 

04/25/2013 James Stearns Mission TX 78572 04/15/2013 James Varnum Oklahoma City OK 73103 04/10/2013 James Zametz Fort Worth TX 76110 X 

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Jan Ray Jan Ray Georgetown Georgetown TX 78626 X X 

04/10/2013 Jane Guinn Rockport TX 78382 04/11/2013 jane vaughan arlington TX 76014 X X X X 04/15/2013 Jane Whitaker Wimberley TX 78676

X

04/10/2013 Janelle Favela Arlington TX 76002 X X X 

04/10/2013 Janet Austin TX 78749

XX X X X X X

04/10/2013 Janet Cooper Corpus Christi TX 78401 X X X 
04/10/2013 Janet Kaylo Leander TX 78641

X X

04/26/2013 Janet Miller Wichita KS 67226 

04/10/2013 Janet Roset Austin TX 78727 XX X X X X X X X X X X 

04/03/2013 Janice Sterling San Antonio TX 78244

X X

04/10/2013 Janis Green Lewisville TX 75057 X X 04/13/2013 Janis Sheen Grapevine TX 76051 04/15/2013 Jann Schwarz La Grange TX 78945 X 04/10/2013 Jaquelyn Miciano Laredo TX 78041

X

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Jasmine Gomez Jasmine Gomez Austin TX 78704 X X 

03/14/2013 Jason Killeen TX 76543

X X X

03/22/2013 Jason Ford Pflugerville TX 78660

X

04/10/2013 Jay Schertz TX 78154 X X X X X X X 04/11/2013 Jean Cameron Colllege Station TX 77845 04/10/2013 Jean Lamberty Dallas TX 75246 X 

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Jeanne Devine Jeanne Devine Austin TX 78748 

X XX

04/15/2013 Jeannette Hernandez San Antonio TX 78207 XX X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Jeffery Killeen TX 76542 X 

04/10/2013 Jeffrey S. Yan Fort Worth TX 76120 X X X X X 
04/11/2013 Jennifer Beck Ingleside TX 78362 X X 

04/10/2013 Jennifer Ellis Austin TX 78704

XX X

04/10/2013 Jennifer Fisher Austin TX 78744 04/10/2013 Jennifer J. Bray Corpus Christi TX 78404

X

04/12/2013 Jennifer Martin Cedar Park TX 78613 X X 

04/10/2013 Jennifer Nazak Ormond Beach FL 32176 X X 

04/01/2013 04/01/2013 Jennifer Wu Jennifer Wu Houston Houston TX 77005 

X

04/10/2013 Jeremiah Scott Richardson TX 75080 04/10/2013 Jeremie Gordon Cedar Park TX 78613

X X

04/10/2013 Jerry Akers Austin TX 78731-

3751

04/01/2013 Jerry Roane - 

comment part 1

Georgetown TX 78628 

XX X X X X X X
04/01/2013 Jerry Roane - 

comment part 2

Georgetown TX 78628

XX X X X X X X

04/01/2013 Jerry Roane - 

comment part 3

Georgetown TX 78628

XX X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Jesse McAllen TX 78503 X 04/10/2013 Jesse summerlin Plano TX 75023 XX X 

04/10/2013 Jesse Warner Grapevine TX 76051 X X 04/03/2013 Jessica McGee Laredo TX 78045 X 

04/13/2013 Jesus F. Salazar Laredo TX 78046-

6527 X X

04/10/2013 Jesus Hernandez Austin TX 78747 X X 04/11/2013 Jesus Justo Guerra Laredo TX 78046-

7322

X X X

03/26/2013 Jill Kelly Grapevine TX 76051 
04/10/2013 jill klores dallas TX 75214 X XX X 

04/02/2013 jim zapata TX 78076

XX X X X X X

04/10/2013 Jim san antonio TX 78240 X 04/10/2013 Jim Domke Arlington TX 76017

XX X

03/17/2013 Jim Skaggs Austin TX 78746

X X

04/26/2013 Jimmie Mitchell Temple TX 76504

X

04/10/2013 Jimmy Peake Flower Mound TX 75028 X X X X 04/10/2013 Jo Bennett Hurst TX 76053-

7147

03/28/2013 Jo Hill Snyder Oklahoma 73113

XX X X X X X

04/11/2013 Joachim Reinhuber San Marcos TX 78666

XX X X

04/10/2013 Joan Rice La Grange TX 78945

XX X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Joan Spanne Duncanville TX 75116

X X

04/10/2013 JoAnn Mulholland Dallas TX 75218

X X

04/10/2013 JoAnn Gilbertson Corpus Christi TX 78402

X X
03/25/2013 Jody Harlan Yukon OK 73099

X

04/11/2013 Jody Morris Fort Worth TX 76123 XX X X X X 

03/30/2013 Joe Houston TX 77006 

04/23/2013 Joe and Jeanm 

Krause

Brownsville TX 78521-

4127 X X 

04/10/2013 Joe Fertitta Dallas TX 75231

XX X

04/10/2013 JOEL MORALES BROWNSVILLE TX 78520

X X X

04/10/2013 Joen Mein Dallas TX 75218

XX X X X X X X X X X X

04/23/2013 John A. Cook, PhD Brownsville TX 78520

X

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 John Barnes John Barnes Fort Worth Fort Worth TX 76185 

XX X X X X X 

04/10/2013 John C. Sanders Austin TX 78741 XX X X X 

04/10/2013 John crawley Austin TX 78745 XX X X X 

04/10/2013 John Gillespie Pantego TX 76013 X X X 04/11/2013 John Hablinski Copus Christi TX 78405

XX X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 John Hilliard Fort Worth TX 76137 X X 

04/10/2013 John Lamont West Selma TX 78154

X

04/17/2013 john mckenzie Kingsville TX 78363

XX 
03/18/2013 john mckenzie Kingsville TX 78363

X

03/15/2013 John Osten San Antonio TX 78213

XX X X

04/10/2013 John Porter Austin TX 78728 X 04/10/2013 John Reiter Dallas TX 75231 X X X 04/10/2013 John T Riecker Salado TX 76571

X

04/10/2013 John Zeigler Denton TX 76209

XX X X X X X

04/08/2013 Johnny Lamb sHERMAN TX 75090 X X X 

04/12/2013 Jolene Chowdhury Leander TX 78641 X X X 04/11/2013 Jonathan Garcia Laredo TX 78045

X

04/02/2013 Jonathan Geserick San Antonio TX 78248 X 04/02/2013 Jonathan Geserick San Antonio TX 78248

X

04/10/2013 Jonathan Marsh Dallas TX 75229 X X 04/10/2013 Jonathan Picha Dallas TX 75241

X X X XX X X

04/01/2013 Jonathan Reynolds Denton TX 76207 

X X X

04/26/2013 Jonna Kelly Mulvane KS 67110 X 

04/10/2013 Jordan Fengel Temple TX 76502

X XX X

04/18/2013 Jorge Sotelo Weslaco TX 78596 03/30/2013 Jose San Benito TX 78586

X X

04/10/2013 Jose Alfredo Jara Laredo TX 78045

XX X X X X
04/10/2013 Jose J Rivera SAN ANTONIO TX 78259

X XX

04/12/2013 Joseph Aguilar Corpus Christi TX 78412

X

04/11/2013 Joseph McClain Laredo TX 78043 XX X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Joseph P Mueller Corpus Christi TX 78411 XX X X X X X X X X X X 

0 8 034/2/21 Josh Soto Laredo T Jos Soto a edo X 78040 X 03/28/2013 Joshua Carter Grand Prairie TX 75052 03/27/2013 Joshua Holland Austin TX 78759 X 

03/26/2013 Joshua Scott Austin TX 78752 04/10/2013 Josie Harland San Antonio TX 78242

XX X

04/10/2013 Joyce Boelsche Buda TX 78610

X X

04/10/2013 Joyce Felter San Antonio TX 78209 X X X 04/11/2013 Joyce M Graham Harlingen TX 78550 X X X X X 04/03/2013 Juan C. Rivera Laredo TX 78041

X

04/11/2013 Juan Jaime Flores Mission TX 78572-

5872 X X X

04/11/2013 Juanita Cardenas Laredo TX 78045

X X

04/03/2013 Judy Loverde Corpus Christi TX 78411

X X

04/10/2013 Judy Mayo Georgetown TX 78633

XX X X X

03/29/2013 Judy Nickels Corpus Christi TX 78412 04/11/2013 Judy Williams Fort Worth TX 76126 X X X 04/10/2013 jule Vigness austin TX 78703

XX X X X X X X
04/10/2013 Julie Bunch Alice TX 78332 X 

04/10/2013 julie garcia San Antonio TX 78215 X 04/11/2013 Julie Odom Round Rock TX 78681

X

04/10/2013 Julie Terrell Austin TX 78716 X X 

04/10/2013 June Harris Austin WA 78758 

03/31/2013 03/31/2013 Justin Funk Duncan OK 73533 Justin Funk Duncan OK 73533 04/23/2013 Justin Tirsun Brownsville TX 78520 04/07/2013 K Weller Lafayette IN 47904

X

04/10/2013 K. S. Jackson San Antonio TX 78218

X X

04/10/2013 Kaitlin Piraro Austin TX 78752

X

04/10/2013 Kalee Spitzack Dallas TX 75252 XX X X 

04/01/2013 Kamel Shrek Laredo TX 78045 

04/01/2013 Kamel Shrek Laredo TX 78045 04/10/2013 karen hickle san marcos TX 78666

X X

04/10/2013 Karen M. Sullivan Weslaco TX 78596 XX X X 

04/11/2013 Karen Miller Corpus Christi TX 78418

XX X X X X X X

04/11/2013 Karen Price Ingleside TX 78362

X XX

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Kari Austin TX 78748 X X X X 04/17/2013 Karl A. Claver Plano TX 75075

XX X X X X X

04/11/2013 Karl Kauffman Waxahachie TX 75167 X X X X X X X X X X 
04/09/2013 KARL ZIEBARTH DALLAS TX 75219

X X X

04/10/2013 Karl-Heinz Morrow McKinney TX 75071 X X 

04/11/2013 Karma Kauffman Waxahachie TX 75167

X

04/24/2013 Karyn Page Wichita KS 67206 04/10/2013 Kate Schnack Austin TX 78745

X X XX

04/11/2013 Katherine Brownell Dallas TX 75218

XX X X X X X

04/04/2013 Katherine Herbison Oklahoma CIty OK 73103 

X X

04/10/2013 Kathie Swafford Corinth TX 76208

XX X X X

04/11/2013 Kathryn D Douville San Antonio TX 78201 XX X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Kathy B. Newman San Antonio TX 78250-

4163

X

04/11/2013 Kathy Sokolic Austin TX 78723 X X 

04/10/2013 Katie Simpson Richardson TX 75080 

X X

04/10/2013 Katie Swierczynski Denton TX 76209 03/26/2013 katie yocham waco TX 76710

X XX X
03/29/2013 Katrina Zirschky Kingsville TX 78363 X 

04/10/2013 katrisha Hernandez Austin TX 78727

XX X X

04/20/2013 Kaye Miller Derby KS 67037

X

04/11/2013 Kayla Glover Bryan TX 77802 04/10/2013 Keegan Taylor Georgetown TX 78626 04/02/2013 Keith Gunnell San Antonio TX 78259 

X X X X

04/10/2013 Keith Quigley Bedford TX 76021 X X X X 04/18/2013 Keith Rogers College Station TX 77845

X X

04/10/2013 Keith Shepherd Blue Mound TX 7.6E+08 

X

04/10/2013 Kellen McIntyre San Antonio TX 78201

XX X X X X X X X X X X

04/04/2013 Kelly R. Martin Ponca City OK 74601 04/10/2013 Ken Hayes Austin TX 78704-

1343 XX X X

03/14/2013 Kenny Kurtz Dallas TX 75238 04/10/2013 Kessie Reddy Helotes TX 78023

X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X 

04/18/2013 Kevin Houston TX 77082 X X 04/03/2013 Kevin Zuniga Laredo TX

X
04/07/2013 Kiem Ta Stillwater OK 74075 

04/10/2013 Kiesha Pearson Desoto TX 75115 X X X 

04/10/2013 Kimberly Zacha Flower Mound TX 75028 04/12/2013 Kinman Tam Allen TX 75013

XX X X

04/10/2013 Kitty L Katz College Station TX 77840 

XX X X X X

04/05/2013 Kris Larkin Cottonwood Falls KS 66845

X

03/24/2013 Kristi Collins Arlington TX 76012 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 04/10/2013 Kristi Collins Arlington TX 76012

XX X X X X X X

04/11/2013 Kristi Maschal Arlington TX 76001 X 

04/10/2013 Kristina Leigh Percival Grand Prairie TX 75051 X X 

04/10/2013 Kristine BrantleyGearhart Austin TX 78734 XX X 04/10/2013 Kristine Marshall Austin TX 78749

X X

04/26/2013 Krystine Lynn - 

comment part 1

La Feria TX 78559

XX X X X
04/26/2013 Krystine Lynn - 

comment part 2

La Feria TX 78559

XX X X X

03/25/2013 Kurt Gwartney Oklahoma City OK 73104

X X X

04/10/2013 Lacey Pyle Houston TX 77004

XX X

04/10/2013 Larry Boatright Carrollton TX 75006 X 

04/11/2013 Larry Graeber San Antonio TX 78212 03/27/2013 Larry Jones burnet TX 78611 04/11/2013 Larry Krasner Dallas TX 75248 XX X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Larry McClung Irving TX 75062 X X 

04/05/2013 Larry W. Schultz Topeka KS 66614-

2812

XX X X X X

04/12/2013 Larry Wetmore grapevine TX 76051 X X 04/11/2013 Lars Stanley Austin TX 78723

X X X

04/10/2013 Laura Austin TX 78741

XX X X

04/15/2013 Laura Almanza Corpus Christi TX 78418

XX X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Laura labatt san antonio TX 78212-

0506

04/10/2013 Laura Parchman Austin TX 78723 X 

04/10/2013 Laura Tabor-Huerta Austin TX 78745 

XX X X X

03/20/2013 Laura W. Wilson Houston TX 77098

XX X
04/10/2013 Laura Zarrella Volente TX 78641

XX X X

04/10/2013 Lauren Oliver Austin TX 78751

XX X

04/10/2013 laurie fuller oklahoma city OK 73034 X X 

04/10/2013 Laurie Gamble Austin TX 78731 XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 Laurie Hartman Orange Grove TX 78372

XX X X X

04/10/2013 Laurie Wood Corpus Christi TX 78411

X X

04/10/2013 Lawrence Dallas TX 75219

XX X

04/10/2013 Lee Maidana Kuhl Bryan TX 77802

XX X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Leighton Clark Fort Worth TX 76110

XX X X

04/02/2013 Len Leshin Corpus Christi TX 78413 

04/02/2013 04/02/2013 Len Leshin Len Leshin Corpus Christi Corpus Christi TX 78413 

04/11/2013 Leo Anderson Austin TX 78759 X X X X X 04/10/2013 Lila Luce Austin TX 78751

XX X X X X

04/10/2013 Lilia DeRousie Laguna Vista TX 78578

X X XX

04/11/2013 Linda Futrell Garland TX 75043

X X X

04/13/2013 Linda Hansen Liberty Hill TX 78642

X X X X XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 Linda Mack Dallas TX 75227 04/10/2013 Linda Plate Dallas TX 75223 X X 

04/26/2013 Linda Schmidt Wichita KS 67217 X 04/11/2013 Linda white Corpus Christi TX 78412 X 
04/17/2013 Linhda austin TX 78704 X X 

04/10/2013 Lisa Frackowiak Smithville TX 78957

X XX X X

04/03/2013 Lisa Rogerio Laredo TX 78045 X 

04/10/2013 Lisa Tingle Austin TX 78737

XX X X

04/10/2013 lisa tremaine dallas TX 75220 XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 lissa redmond pflugerville TX 78660 04/19/2013 Liz Johnston Austin TX 78723 

04/01/2013 LIZ Langthorn okc OK 73103

X

04/10/2013 Lorn MacDougal Austin 78704

XX X X X

04/11/2013 Lowell Watson Austin TX 78739 X X X 04/10/2013 Lucy Stolzenburg Austin TX 78737 

XX X X X X

04/10/2013 Luis Garza McAllen TX 78504 X X X X X X X 04/25/2013 Luis Guerrero Pharr TX 78577 X 

04/10/2013 Luis Rivera Laredo TX 78045 04/26/2013 Luke SImons Fayetteville AR 72703 X 

04/26/2013 Lupe Ybarra Weslaco TX 78596

X

04/10/2013 Luvada Smith Dallas TX 75241 X 04/10/2013 Lynn Denton Austin TX 78737

X X
04/01/2013 Lynn McCord San Antonio TX 78247

X

04/24/2013 Lynn Nichols Andover KS 67002 04/10/2013 M. RODRIGUEZ LAREDO TX 78040

X

04/10/2013 Mae newcombe Austin TX 78741 XX X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Maggi Joseph San Antonio TX 78228

XX X

04/18/2013 Manuela Gardner Corpus Christi TX 78418

X X X X X XX X X X X X 

04/11/2013 Marc Hoffman San Antonio TX 78258

XX X X X

04/10/2013 Marc W. McCord Celina TX 75009

XX X X X X X X

04/14/2013 Marcia Austin TX 78731 04/10/2013 Marcia Ingram McAllen TX 78503 X X X XX X 

04/01/2013 Marcy Newman South Padre Island TX 78597 X X 04/18/2013 Marcy Newman, 

Public Works Director, City of South Padre Island

South Padre Island TX 78597 

X X

04/10/2013 Margaret Caylor Marble Falls TX 78654 XX X X X X X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Margery Hunter Dallas TX 75223 XX X X X X X 

04/04/2013 Margie Garza Laredo TX 78041 
04/11/2013 Maria E. Villarreal Brownsville TX 78526

X

04/10/2013 Maria Guzman Dallas TX 75231 04/10/2013 Marie Hermitte Austin TX 78722

X XX X

04/10/2013 Marie-Helene Hye Southlake TX 76092 X X X 

04/10/2013 Marigay Carrollton TX 75006 X X X 04/10/2013 marilyn mock Austin TX 78746 

X XX

04/02/2013 Mario A. Lopez Rio Grande City TX 78582

XX X

04/10/2013 Marisa Morales Leander TX 78641 04/10/2013 Mark Craig Austin TX 78758

X XX X

04/27/2013 04/27/2013 Mark Gibbs Mark Gibbs Oklahoma City Oklahoma City OK 73102 

X

04/10/2013 Mark Johnson Austin TX 78723 X 

04/10/2013 Mark Kaswan Brownsville TX 78520

XX X X X
04/17/2013 Mark L. Thomas Bryan TX 77803

XX X X

04/10/2013 Mark lee Euless TX 76039 X 04/10/2013 Mark McKim Austin TX 78721

XX X

04/10/2013 Mark Roberts Brownsville TX 78521 

04/18/2013 Mark S. Bucol St. Louis MO 63141

XX X

04/10/2013 Mark S. Pena Edinburg TX 78539

XX X X X X X X X

04/11/2013 Marla Reagle Flower Mound TX 75028 X X X X X X 04/10/2013 Marlene Lebel Smithville TX 78957 X 04/10/2013 Martha Holland OKC OK 73107 X 

04/03/2013 Martha S. Navarro Laredo TX 78044 04/14/2013 Martha Webb Denton TX 76207

X X

04/25/2013 Mary Ann Moore Pharr TX 78577 X X 

04/10/2013 Mary Clark Joshua TX 76058

X X

04/10/2013 Mary De La Rosa Laredo TX 78041

X

04/10/2013 mary glenn rockdale TX 76567 XX X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Mary L Gomez Mary L. Gomez San Antonio San Antonio TX 78239 

X 

04/12/2013 Mary Long Austin TX 78704 X 

04/10/2013 Mary Lou Trice Hewitt TX 76643

XX X
04/10/2013 Mary Parrish Waco TX 76710

X XX

04/10/2013 Mary Pettit Bulverde TX 78163 X 

04/10/2013 Mary Sue Rose Austin TX 78703

X

04/10/2013 Mary Vogelson Dallas TX 75220

XX X X X

04/10/2013 Mary Whitlow Dallas TX 75225 XX X X 

04/10/2013 MASON W COX AUSTIN TX 78752

X X

04/10/2013 Matt Austin TX 78734 04/10/2013 Matt Griffith Austin TX 78745

X X X X

04/10/2013 Matt Turner Austin TX 78704

X

04/11/2013 Matt Wells Fort Worth TX 76116 X X X X X X X 04/10/2013 Matt Willson Austin TX 78703 

XX X

04/10/2013 Matthew Gossage Austin TX 78702 XX X 

03/30/2013 Matthew Trecha Detroit MI 48202

X

04/19/2013 Matthew Wall Denton TX 76201

XX X X X X X
04/25/2013 Maureen Lopez Edinburg TX 78539

X X X X

04/10/2013 Mel Templet Potssboro TX 75076 XX X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Melanie DeMartinis Austin TX 78748

XX X

04/10/2013 Melinda Gray Fort Worth TX 76109 

XX X X

04/11/2013 melissa bransom denison TX 75020

XX X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Melissa Czar SAn Antonio TX 78232 X X X 04/16/2013 Melissa Wilson Corpus Christi TX 78411

XX X X

04/10/2013 mia carr dallas TX 75254 X X X X X X X X 04/10/2013 Michael Aiuvalasit Dallas TX 75214

X X

04/20/2013 Michael Birlin Dallas TX 75228 X 04/10/2013 Michael Brooks New Braunfels TX 78130

XX X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Michael Dubrick Highland Village TX 75077 XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 Michael Grish Austin TX 78752-

1412

XX X

03/20/2013 Michael Kohutek Arlington TX 76017

X X

04/11/2013 Michael Lamberth San Marcos TX 78666 
04/10/2013 Michael McMurtrey Carrollton TX 75007 

04/01/2013 Michael McPhail Irving TX 75061

XX X X X

04/01/2013 Michael Pena Laredo TX 78041

X

03/25/2013 Michael R. Reagan Jacksonville TX 75766 04/10/2013 Michael Thompson Austin TX 78704 XX X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Michele Hallahan Austin TX 78704

X XX

04/10/2013 Michelle Llauger Bastrop TX 78602 X 

04/02/2013 michelle quiter san antonio TX 78229

X X

03/31/2013 Mickey Gorrell Yukon OK 73099 04/10/2013 Micky Morris Dallas TX 75233

XX X X X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Miguel Cobos Edinburg TX 78541

X X

04/10/2013 Mike Adams Hutto TX 78634 X X X X 0 0 03 e da s utto 863 

X X X X 

04/10/2013 mike harris austin TX 78766 XX X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Mike Medina Laredo TX 78045 X 04/10/2013 Mike O'Lena Dallas TX 75206

X
03/25/2013 mike reim purcell OK 73080

X

04/10/2013 miki ramos san antonio TX 78259

X X

03/27/2013 Mildred Colbert Muskogee OK 74401

X X X

04/10/2013 Minerva Soto Laredo TX 78040 X 04/07/2013 Mitchell Ginsburg San Antonio TX 78231 

X X

04/10/2013 Mitzi Cedar Park TX 78613

XX X X X X X

04/10/2013 MJ Blaze Dallas TX 75380

X X X

04/10/2013 Mobi Warren San Antonio TX 78232-

2418

2418 

X XX

04/13/2013 Mollie nelso Austin TX 78702 XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 Molly Rooke Dallas TX 75206

XX X X X

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Molly Walker Molly Walker Austin TX 78721 

XX X X X X X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 monica crust mansfield TX 76063

XX X X X X X X X X

04/24/2013 morrie sheets wichita KS 67218 
04/10/2013 Morris Sandel Austin TX 78702

XX X X

04/10/2013 Most Rev. DJ Loggins, 

EMG, OSB, Celt. Orth.

Hutto TX 78634-

5031

04/26/2013 Mr Jan van Asselt McPherson KS 67460

X

04/10/2013 Myra Smith Burleson TX 76028

XX X X

03/14/2013 N P Hips Garland TX 75041 

X XX X

04/03/2013 Nancy Garza Corpus Christi TX 78415 04/11/2013 Nancy Hart buda TX 78610

XX X X X X X X X

04/11/2013 Nancy Meador Harwood TX 78632 03/28/2013 Nancy Peters Eufaula OK 74432 04/01/2013 Nancy Russell Sherman TX 75092

X X

04/10/2013 Nancy White Georgetown TX 78628 X X X X X X X X X 04/11/2013 nathalie NRh TX 76182 X 

04/10/2013 Ned Allen Floresville TX 78114 04/12/2013 Neill Matheson Dallas TX 75208

XX X

04/02/2013 Nerissa Lindsey Laredo TX 78040 04/17/2013 Nick Serafy Brownsville TX 78520 

04/10/2013 Nicole Solano Fort Worth TX 76140 X 

04/04/2013 noemi pedroza Laredo TX 78044 04/10/2013 NORMA OLIVARES MISSION TX 78572 X 

04/23/2013 Olivia Cornyn San Antonio TX 78230 X X X X X X 03/26/2013 OLUKANYIN 

BODEHARRISON

MUSKOGEE OK 74401

X
04/15/2013 Omar Jimenez Dallas TX 75253

X

04/10/2013 Orfa L Salinas Dallas TX 75231

X X

04/25/2013 Orlando Salinas Elsa TX 78543 X X 04/25/2013 Oscar Lopez Edinburg TX 78539

X

04/17/2013 P Hayes RICHARDSON TX 75085 04/10/2013 Pamela Phillips San Antonio TX 78216

X X

04/05/2013 Pat Corley Oklahoma City OK 73112 X 

04/11/2013 Pat Fahrenthold San Antonio TX 78249 X X X 

04/10/2013 Pat Gallagher Dallas TX 75209 04/10/2013 Pat Harper McKinney TX 75070

X X

04/10/2013 Patience Patterson Fort Worth TX 76133

X X X XX X X X

04/11/2013 Patricia Bourland Dallas TX 75229

X

04/04/2013 Patricia Cadena Corpus Christi TX 78412

X X

04/10/2013 Patricia Cleere College Station TX 77841

X

04/10/2013 Patricia Duhon San Marcos TX 78666

X X X XX

04/14/2013 Patricia Norwood, MD San Antonio TX 78209 XX X 

04/13/2013 Patricia Reinhardt CC TX 78404 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 

X X X X X X X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Patricia Wheeler Plano TX 75074

X X
04/02/2013 Patrick D. Allred Laredo TX 78045

X X

04/10/2013 Patrick Marron Fischer TX 78623 X X X X X X X 04/27/2013 Paul Babich Wichita KS 67208-

3426

04/20/2013 Paul Everett Vinson San Antonio TX 78258-

3299

04/06/2013 Paul Gerhardt Woodway TX 76712 X 03/14/2013 Paul J. Smith, Jr. Georgetown TX 78633-

5256

X

04/15/2013 Paul Kendall Fort Worth TX 76112

X

04/10/2013 Paula Stone San Antonio TX 78209

X XX

04/13/2013 Paula Brennecke Bonham TX 75418 X X 

04/07/2013 Paula Haas Matfield Green KS 66862 04/10/2013 Paula Pueblitz Laredo 78041 04/10/2013 Paula Streever Austin TX 78746 X X X X 04/01/2013 Pauline Dowling Donna TX 78537 

X X

04/11/2013 Pedro J. Colon Fort Worth TX 76114

X
04/01/2013 Pedro Paredes Jr Laredo TX 78041

X X

04/05/2013 Peggy Braswell Corpus Christi TX 78412 04/10/2013 Peggy Dean Dallas TX 75248 XX X X X 

04/10/2013 Peggy La Point Denton TX 76205

X

04/24/2013 Pete Meitzner Vice-Mayor Wichita 

City Council

Wichita KS 67202

X X X

04/10/2013 Peter Manchaca TX 78652

X X

04/11/2013 Peter Baughman San Antonio TX 78256 X X X X 04/16/2013 Peter LeCody Dallas TX 75226 

04/10/2013 Philip Kay Austin TX 78765 04/02/2013 Philip Krawczynski Belton TX 76513

X

04/02/2013 Phillip Davis Corpus Christi TX 78411 

X 

04/11/2013 Quentin Lucas Austin TX 78731

XX X X
03/24/2013 R L Rushing Madill OK 73446

X

04/10/2013 R. Preston Tom Bean TX 75489 XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 Rachel Maldonado Round Rock TX 78664-

6659 XX X X X

04/10/2013 Rafael Hammett Dallas TX 75218 XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 Rajni Patel Irivng TX 75062 XX X X X X X 

04/11/2013 Ralph Galvan San Antonio TX 78201

XX X X X X X X

03/20/2013 Randi Eldevik Stillwater OK 74074 

03/31/2013 Randy Bear San Antonio TX 78207

X X

04/10/2013 Raymond Reed College Station TX 77840 X X X X X X X X 04/10/2013 Rebecca Doll Wimberley TX 78676 X X X X 04/26/2013 Rebecca Fields Wichita KS 67208 X 04/26/2013 Rep. Pete DeGraaf Kansas 

Representative

Mulvane KS 67110

X X

03/15/2013 Rev. Karl A. Claver Plano TX 75075

XX X X

04/26/2013 Rev. Robert 

Hemberger

Wichita KS 67202

X

04/03/2013 Ricardo A. Salinas Laredo TX 78043 

04/10/2013 Ricardo Martinez Edinburg TX 78541 X 
04/10/2013 Richard Arredondo San Antonio TX 78258

X

04/03/2013 Richard Chamberlain laredo TX 78045 04/10/2013 RICHARD 

DONALDSON

AUSTIN TX 78735 X 

04/10/2013 Richard Fralin Austin TX 78703-

4320

XX X X

03/14/2013 Richard Gabel Dalals TX 75219

X X X

04/26/2013 Richard Klemp Mulvane KS 67110 

04/13/2013 richard traylor cedar hill TX 75104 X 

04/10/2013 Rick English Dallas TX 75219

X X

04/10/2013 Rita Clarke Dallas TX 75234

XX X X X X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Rita hersey Austin TX 78703 XX X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 RJ Oliver Austin TX 78745

X X XX

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Rob Inman Rob Inman Irving TX 75038 X X X X X X X X X X 03/27/2013 Robert Farnsworth - 

comment part 1

Austin TX 78758

X X
03/27/2013 Robert Farnsworthcomment part 2 Austin TX 78758

X X

03/27/2013 Robert Farnsworthcomment part 3 Austin TX 78758 

X X
03/27/2013 Robert Farnsworth - 

comment part 4

Austin TX 78758

X X

03/27/2013 Robert Farnsworth - 

comment part 5

Austin TX 78758 

X X
03/27/2013 Robert Farnsworth - 

comment part 6

Austin TX 78758

X X

04/10/2013 Robert G. Ferrell La Vernia TX 78121 04/15/2013 Robert K. Tickner Denton TX 76208 

X

03/30/2013 Robert Moen Bloomington MN 55420

X

04/10/2013 Robert Null Austin TX 78745

X X

04/10/2013 Robert Null Austin TX 78745

X X

04/11/2013 Robert Ray Waco TX 76708 X X 

04/10/2013 Robert Rinker Grand Prairie TX 75052 X X 

04/10/2013 Robert Shadowen Austin TX 78750 

XX X X

04/10/2013 Robert Wright San Antonio TX 78216

XX X
03/29/2013 Roberta Barrera Corpus Christi TX 78418

X

04/11/2013 Roberto Gonzalez Laredo TX 78046

X

04/10/2013 Robin Bischof Dallas TX 75231

XX X

04/10/2013 Robin Wood Wimberley TX 78676 XX X 

04/11/2013 Robyn Cloughley Austin TX 78723 XX X X X X 

03/14/2013 Rodney Blasingame Riesel TX 76682 04/10/2013 Roel Cantu Mission TX 78572

X

04/25/2013 Rogelio Mission TX 78572 04/05/2013 Roger clark Grand Island NE 68802 04/05/2013 Roger clark Grand Island NE 68802 

04/25/2013 Roger Durham Dallas TX 75238

X X X

04/22/2013 Roger Neufeldt Norman OK 73069 X 04/10/2013 Roger Rose Laredo TX 78041

X

04/08/2013 Rolando Smith Laredo TX 78040

XX X

04/08/2013 04/08/2013 Rolando Smith Laredo T R l d S ih L d TX 78040 

XX X

04/10/2013 Rolando Smith Laredo TX 78040 X X X X X X X 04/10/2013 Roman Fruth San Antonio TX 78228

X

04/10/2013 roman smetak dallas TX 75228

XX X X X X X X X X
04/10/2013 Ron Barbosa Grapevine TN 76051-

3127 XX X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Ron Hamiton Southlake TX 76092 04/10/2013 Ron Marshall Sunnyvale TX 75182 X X X X X X X X 04/20/2013 Ron Merrick Houston TX 77071

XX X

04/10/2013 Ron Noble San antonio TX 78259-

2620

X

04/03/2013 Ron Sparks Miami FL 33166 X X X X 04/03/2013 Ron Sparks Miami FL 33166 

X X X X 

03/30/2013 Ron Villarreal Aransas Pass TX 78336 04/21/2013 RonnBradley Augusta KS 67010 X 04/10/2013 Rooolfo Rosales San Antonio TX 78201

X

04/10/2013 rosalind detrich Cushing OK 74023

X X

04/11/2013 Rose Kyle TX 78640

XX X X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Rose Ann Reeser West Lake Hills TX 78746

X X X X X X XX X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Rose Garcia San Antonio TX 78214 04/17/2013 Rose Timmer Brownsville TX 78526 04/10/2013 Rosemary Rambow San Antonio TX 78209-

2447 X X X X XX X 

04/10/2013 Ross King Ft Worth TX 76110 03/15/2013 Roxanne Conrad Fort Worth TX 76120 

04/01/2013 Roy Triplett Tulsa OK 74133 

04/10/2013 RoyAnn Cox Denton TX 76209

XX X X X
04/10/2013 Rudy and Barbara 

Stippec

Denton TX 76209-

3404

XX X X X X X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Russell Barros San Antonio TX 78210 X 

03/31/2013 russell hein denison TX 75020 

X 

04/14/2013 Rusty Osborne Austin TX 78733

X X

04/14/2013 Ruth Reid Corpus Christi TX 78414

XX X X X

04/10/2013 Ruth Stewart San Antonio TX 78249

XX X X X

03/18/2013 Ryan Van Alstyne TX 75495

X X

04/10/2013 Ryan Dishaw Austin TX 78756

X X X

04/10/2013 Ryan Fleming Austin TX 78751 04/12/2013 Ryan Hochstatter Corinth TX 76210

XX X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Ryan Schumacher Denton TX 76201

XX X X X

03/31/2013 S. Lewis Coleman San Antonio TX 78201 04/11/2013 S. Hess Mesquite TX 75181 

XX X
04/10/2013 Samantha Morgan Corpus Christi TX 78411

X

04/11/2013 samia austin TX 78746 X X 04/03/2013 Sandra Laredo TX 78043 04/10/2013 Sandra Douglass Duncanville TX 75116

XX X X

04/10/2013 Sandra Enders San Antonio TX 78258 X X 04/10/2013 SANDRA GREGOR AUSTIN TX 78701 X 

04/10/2013 Sandra Pottin Laredo TX 78043 04/10/2013 Sandra Pottin Laredo TX 78043 04/01/2013 Sandra Wilkerson Houston TX 77095

X

04/23/2013 santiago abrego brownsville TX 78526 X 

04/10/2013 Santos Rosales Duncanville TX 75137 X X X 03/29/2013 Sara Davis Corpus Christi TX 78413 

X X

04/10/2013 sarah jeansonne austin TX 78745-

2741 X 

04/01/2013 Sarah Tracy Oklahoma City OK 73103

X X X

04/01/2013 Scott A. Brooks Florence TX 76527 04/10/2013 Scott DiBenedetto McKinney TX 75071

XX X
04/11/2013 Scott Dubble Austin TX 78723

XX X X X XX

04/26/2013 Scott Fry Brownsville TX 78526 04/11/2013 Scott Melcer Austin TX 78722 X X 04/12/2013 Scott Taylor Mckinney TX 75071 04/26/2013 Scott Wagner City Councilman Kansas City MO 64106

X

04/08/2013 Sean Barry Austin TX 78752

X

03/21/2013 Señor Kevin Drury Moore OK 73170

X

04/11/2013 Sergio C Hernandez Brownsville TX 78521

X

04/10/2013 Sharon A. Harris Carrollton TX 75007 X X X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Sharon Bramblett Sharon Bramblett Austin TX 78751- 

3206

X X X X

04/10/2013 Sharon I Gouwens Fort Worth TX 76132 XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 Shea Kinser Fort Worth TX 76126 04/10/2013 shelley smith austin TX 78704 X X 04/10/2013 shelva wood plano TX 75023 X X 

04/10/2013 Sherrill Campbell Denton TX 76209

X

04/10/2013 Shilpa Mistry DALLAS TX 75233 X X 

04/25/2013 shirley rubenstein dallas TX 75254 04/11/2013 Sid McManus Fort Worth TX 76132 X X 

04/10/2013 Silvia Salinas Mission TX 78572 

X X 

04/15/2013 Siri Bletzer San Antonio TX 78256 04/23/2013 Sister Irma Gonzalez Brownsville TX 78520-

7436 X 
04/10/2013 Skip Londos Waco TX 76710

X

04/10/2013 Sofia McAllen TX 78504 04/10/2013 Sophia Pena Garza McAllen TX 78504

X X

04/10/2013 Sosha Ruark-Cavett Austin TX 78753 X X XX X X 

04/10/2013 spencer conklin austin TX 78727 XX X X X X X X 

04/02/2013 04/02/2013 SRINI RAGHAVAN SRINI RAGHAVAN PLANO TX 75023 

XX X

04/10/2013 Stan Benton Von Ormy TX 78073

X X

04/10/2013 Stephan Grundy Dallas TX 75205 04/10/2013 Stephanie Kraemer Coppell TX 75019 X X 

04/11/2013 Stephen Wyman Georgetown TX 78633-

4362 XX X X X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Stephni M. Demarest S h iM D Austn TX 78736 

X X 

04/20/2013 STEVE ANDERSON SAN ANTONIO TX 78254 04/10/2013 Steve Busti Austin TX 78701

XX X

04/22/2013 Steve Clark Brownsville TX 78520 04/10/2013 Steve Dale Austin TX 78717 XX X X X 

04/14/2013 STEVE ERWIN HURST TX 76053

X X
03/28/2013 Steve Goen - 

Comment part 1

Wichita Falls TX 76302-

2911

03/28/2013 Steve Goen - 

Comment part 2

Wichita Falls TX 76302-

2911

04/24/2013 Steve Hauck Wichita KS 67212 03/31/2013 Steve Marlett Yukon OK 73099 04/10/2013 Steve Muschenheim Laguna Vista TX 78578 X 

03/20/2013 Steve Prather Austin TX 78704 04/13/2013 Steve Temple San Antonio TX 78209 

X X X XX X X

04/11/2013 Steve Voltmann Dallas TX 75214 X X X 
04/10/2013 Steven Descant Laredo TX 78045 X XX 

04/02/2013 Steven Dikcis SAN ANTONIO TX 78209 04/10/2013 Steven G. Kellman San Antonio TX 78231-

1519

XX X X X

04/11/2013 Storms Reback Austin TX 78751 X 

04/11/2013 Sue Smith Denton TX 76201 X X 

04/23/2013 Sumner Brownsville TX 78566

X

04/10/2013 Suneet Upadrasta Austin TX 78731

XX X X

04/10/2013 Sunny Roberts Austin TX 78723-

2314

04/10/2013 Susan A Schott Dallas TX 75208 X X 

04/10/2013 Susan Alardin Laredo TX 78045

X

04/10/2013 Susan and John 

Teague

Austin TX 78734

XX X X X X X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Susan Dorsey Mesquite TX 75181 X 

04/10/2013 Susan Gifford San Antonio TX 78249

XX X X X X

04/10/2013 Susan Jane Reeves Ft Worth TX 76110 X X X X X X X 

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 susan jane reeves Ft Worth T j Ft W th TX 76110 

XX X X X X

04/10/2013 Susan kleinman Austin TX 78759

X X
04/10/2013 Susan Resendiz Laredo TX 78043

X

04/11/2013 Susan Scott Austin TX 78735

X X

04/19/2013 Susan Stewart Luling TX 78648 04/10/2013 Susan Syler Austin TX 78731 X X 

04/10/2013 susan wallace prosper TX 75078

X X

04/10/2013 Susan Waskey Argyle TX 76226

X X

04/10/2013 Susan Young Austin TX 78751

X X

04/24/2013 susie santo wichita KS 67230 04/25/2013 Suzanne Kennedy Austin TX 78704

X

04/11/2013 Suzanne RamoGechter Laredo TX 78045 

X X 

04/10/2013 Suzanne Tuttle Fort Worth TX 76135

XX X X

04/11/2013 SYLVIA BUTLER DALLAS TX 75220 04/21/2013 Sylvia Duncan Plano TX 75075

X X X

04/10/2013 Sylvia Neal-Tomlinson Austin TX 78749 X 

04/10/2013 t logan Austin TX 78704 X X X 04/13/2013 Tammy Dobbs Denton TX 76205 04/10/2013 Tania Olivarez Edinburg TX 78541

X X

04/10/2013 Tara Munoz Austin TX 78728 
04/10/2013 Taryn Shick Austin TX 78747

XX X X

04/10/2013 Teresa Austin TX 78758 X X X 

04/10/2013 Teresa J Mayfield IRVING TX 7.5E+08

X X

04/10/2013 Teri San Marcos TX 78666

X

04/11/2013 Terri Smith Mesquite TX 75149 04/10/2013 Terry San Antonio TX 78230 X X 

04/10/2013 Terry jean Waco TX 76701 04/14/2013 Terry Owings Leander TX 78641

X X X

04/10/2013 Terry S Bridges College Station TX 77845 04/10/2013 Terry Sebolt San Antonio TX 78239 
04/11/2013 Tex McFaden Dallas TX 75230

XX X X X X X X X X

04/10/2013 Theresa Bradbury fort worth TX 76108 XX X X X X X X X X X X X 

04/11/2013 Theresa Moran Austin TX 78736 X 

04/24/2013 Therese Gallegos Brownsville TX 78526

XX X

04/10/2013 Thomas A. Townsend Garland TX 75043-

5629 X XXX 

04/10/2013 Thomas jaudzemis Laguna Vista TX 78578

X XX X

04/11/2013 THOMAS LOPEZ WACO TX 76707 XX X X X X 

04/10/2013 Thomas Manes Wimberley TX 78676

X XX

04/10/2013 Thomas Nieland Alamo TX 78516 XX X X X 

04/10/2013 04/10/2013 Thomas Reeck Thomas Reeck Austin TX 80026 

X

04/10/2013 Thomas Rinard Waco TX 76706 
04/10/2013 Thomas Terry Fort Worth TX 76131-

4259

XX X X X X X

04/10/2013 Thomas Watson Austin TX 78737-

9029 X X X

04/11/2013 Tiffany Plano TX 75074

X

03/25/2013 Tim Jeske Waco TX 76710

XX 

04/11/2013 Tim Maschal Arlington TX 76001 XX X X X X X 

04/10/2013 Tina Allen Souza Leander TX 78641 XX X X X 

04/03/2013 Tina Everett Corpus Christi TX 78418 X 04/11/2013 Tobin Quereau Austin TX 78759

X XX

04/01/2013 Tom Ballou New Braunfels TX 78132

X

03/13/2013 Tom Gates Corpus Christi TX 78411 04/11/2013 Tom Lednicky Austin 78745 XX X X X 

04/23/2013 Tom Logan Brownsville TX 78521 X 

04/26/2013 Tom Racunas Wichita KS 67212 

04/10/2013 Tom Russell Okla. City OK 73127

XX X X

03/14/2013 Tom Verdel Sand Springs OK 74063

X X
03/27/2013 Tom Walker Ardmre OK 73401-

1156 X

04/10/2013 Tom Wilbanks Mesquite TX 75149 04/10/2013 Tori Davis Austin TX 78723 X 04/02/2013 Tracy Jackson Fort Worth TX 76120 04/10/2013 Tria Shaffer Leander TX 78641

XX X

04/10/2013 trudy williams college station TX 77840 X X X X X X X X 04/25/2013 TWILA WILLIAMS MCALLEN TX 78501

X

04/11/2013 TX Dallas TX 75206 X X X X X X 

X X X X X X 

03/14/2013 Tyler Brown DALLAS TX 75204

X

04/11/2013 Tyler Paul L'Utt Dallas TX 75214-

1738 X 

04/10/2013 Valerie Guerrero McAllen TX 78503 X 04/10/2013 Vanston Hamilton Dallas TX 75238 X X X 04/20/2013 Vardeman Moore Dallas TX 75240 04/05/2013 Verona Mair Ponca City OK 74602 

X X

04/10/2013 Veronica Gard San Antonio TX 78247

X X

04/04/2013 Vicki Anderson Zapata TX 78076

X X

04/10/2013 Victor Ostrower San Antonio TX 78209

X X

04/14/2013 victoria devereaux kyle TX 78640 

XX X

04/10/2013 Victoria Ochoa Euless TX 76039

XX X

04/10/2013 Victoria piper Richardson TX 75083 X X 
04/10/2013 Vikki Hallen Canyon Lake TX 78133

XX X X

04/10/2013 Vince Fonseca San Antonio TX 78212

XX X

04/10/2013 Virgil Crane San Antonio TX 78230 XX X X X X 

04/03/2013 Virginia Garcia Laredo TX 78040

X XX X

04/11/2013 Virginia Griffith Austin TX 78746 

X

04/11/2013 Vonnie Shallenberger Fort Worth TX 76132

XX X X X X X

04/01/2013 Wanda pearce Midwest City OK 73130 04/26/2013 Ware, Marie-Pierre Little Elm TX 75068 04/15/2013 wendy Eames Round Rock TX 78664

X

04/10/2013 Wendy Leiva Round Rock TX 78681

X X

04/10/2013 Wendy Meyer Dallas TX 75206-

5842 X X

04/10/2013 Wendy Paul Dallas TX 75229 X X 

04/11/2013 wendy searcy bedford TX 76021 XX X X X X X 

04/09/2013 Wes Bailey Waco TX 76701

X

04/10/2013 wesley morrison new braunfels TX 78130 X X X 

04/10/2013 Whitney Columbus Benbrook TX 76126 X X X X X 04/12/2013 William Dallas TX 75209

XX X X X X X X

04/16/2013 William Maschal Round Rock TX 78664 04/11/2013 William Sibley christine TX 78012 04/15/2013 Wolf Dilworth Austin TX 78747

XX X X

04/10/2013 x austin TX 78701 X 04/10/2013 x austin TX 78701 X 
04/04/2013 xavier villalon laredo TX 78045 X 

04/10/2013 Yolanda C. Alvarez Fort Worth TX 76106 X X X X X X X X X X X 04/15/2013 Yolanda Tijerina San Antonio TX 78242 XX X 

04/11/2013 Yvette Leach San Antonio TX 78251 X X 04/10/2013 Yvonne Hansen Austin TX 78745

XX X X X X X X X X X

04/11/2013 Zach Austin TX 78702 X X X 

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail 

cover 1Appendix B 

Comments Recorded via Other Methods 

4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVptZAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/2

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

marksrage.allen@gmail.com

Sent:Thursday, April 18, 2013 8:50 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Mr. Marks Allen<marksrage.allen@gmail.com>

Address:

9321 W. Central #3

Wichita, KS 67212

Phone:

(316) 285-9066

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: Please include Natural Gas generating electricity into your train

studies. Electric Heartland Flyer from Ft. Worth to Oklahoma City. The

Heartland Flyer extended to Wichita, Kansas. Many people from Wichita

have direct flights to Dallas everyday.

Natural gas is our low priced resource and the industry can partner with

passenger train legislation in every state. Electrical infrastructure

regionally adds expense but that's the best fuel source in the long term.

An environmental fast train in our region.

Amtrak will have their many stops cities. High Speed trains on separate

tracks going 200 mile distances. 150 mph trains is legal now, the future

can add speeds. Class 9 rails are need.

KDOT has to soon help Wichita getting on the DOT High Speed Rail map so

the city can qualify for Federal NEPA studies. Wichita is the passenger

train connector city between the southern and northern trains to Kansas

City, to St. Louis, to Chicago.

We need electric trains rolling in our region that are using natural gas

generating the electricity.
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVptZAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 2/2



1

From: Bill Bailey [mailto:bill@baileyinsurance.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 11:41 AM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Oklahoma to South Tx. Rail Study

  

I am very interested in the study that is to take place, and I

want to express my strong support for the route to come

through Waco.  Waco is a major city on the I‐35 corridor and

must be included in the route.  Thank you for your kind

consideration.

A.W. (Bill) Bailey, Jr.

 
1

From: Wes Bailey 

Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 6:12:33 PM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Subject: Passenger Rail Service

Dear Director Glavin – As a Waco businessman and President of the Waco Business League, I wanted to

touch base with you and voice my support of the proposed passenger rail service from Oklahoma City to

South Texas. This would be great for Texas AND great for Waco. It is my firm belief that Waco’s

connectivity to such a rail system is extremely important to our community’s continued economic

growth and vibrancy – not to mention the economic growth of the whole region.

  

When you consider the very limited air service we have in Waco – coupled with a terribly congested I‐35

roadway, this new passenger rail system will be similar to manna from heaven. Please know that

Wacoans want it! And we need it! Thank you very much.  

  

Wes Bailey, CIC

President, Bailey Insurance & Risk Management, Inc.

P.O. Box 298

Waco, Texas 76703

Telephone # 254-753-5317

wes@baileyinsurance.com
2

Confidentiality notice: The information included in this e-mail, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended 

recipient and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or similar 

action is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the original message 

immediately.

  

  

  

 


1

Staley, Jennifer/PDX

From: Mark Werner [Mark.Werner@txdot.gov]

Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 7:07 AM

To: Hull, Kristin/PDX; Hausknecht, Brian/SDO; Walbrun, Mark/DFW; Steffen, Brandy/PDX

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Completed

Another comment 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Orlando Jamandre 

Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 9:05 AM 

To: Mark Werner 

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E-Mail 

TOPRS comment via AskTxDOT 

-----Original Message----- 

From: lmb2.at.home@netzero.com [mailto:lmb2.at.home@netzero.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 9:41 AM 

To: AskTxDOT 

Subject: TxDOT Internet E-Mail 

Name: Ms. Linda M Brown<lmb2.at.home@netzero.com> Requested Contact Method: E-Mail 

Reason for Contact: Customer Service 

Complaint: No 

Comment: I was not able to attend the public meetings related to IH 35. I have traveled IH 

35 at least twice a day Monday through Friday for 20 years, sometimes more trips than that. 

Austin is a popular destination, and becoming more so every year. In my opinion, more lanes 

is not a satisfactory option. Looking to the future, ideas need to be "out of the box" to 

keep Austin moving. As other cities like Chicago, New York, London - Austin needs mass 

transit. If not a subway, then elevated trains. I would definitely use a commuter train that 

ran down the middle of IH 35 from Georgetown to Kyle, Buda, San Marcos, San Antonio for 

example. A train is not slowed by traffic conditions, and being down IH 

35 would allow stops to be within walking distance of government offices and the 

entertainment district 

Be Safe. Drive Smart. 








4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVeb%2fAAAJ&a=Print&pspid... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

Mersac2000@hotmail.com

Sent:Monday, April 01, 2013 11:27 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Ms. Monica Camacho<Mersac2000@hotmail.com>

Address:

4818 Rockford

San Antonio, TX 78249

Phone:

(210) 347-8829

Requested Contact Method:

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: When will they do a study for the I10 corridor?
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVeb7AAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

ann.cates@north-houston.com

Sent:Monday, April 01, 2013 10:59 AM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Ms. Ann Cates<ann.cates@north-houston.com>

Address:

16825 Northchase Drive #160

Houston, TX 77060

Phone:

(281) 875-0660 Ext. 11

Requested Contact Method:

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: I would like to inquire on the status of a line from Dallas to

Houston? I don't see Houston included in this study, but are there any

additional studies planned that would included Houston on the rail line?




1

From: Felicia Goodman [mailto:felicia@cooperfdn.org] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 10:31 AM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Support for Passenger Rail Service in Waco

  

Dear Mr. Glavin:

The mission of the Cooper Foundation is to make Waco a better place to live. A critical part of making Waco a 

better place is ensuring our community’s long‐term economic success.  For this reason, the Cooper Foundation

strongly supports passenger rail service in Waco.

Both passenger and freight rail service are crucially important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and 

global competitive position. Locally, Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to our 

community’s and our region’s continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, 

congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely,

Felicia Chase Goodman

Executive Director

Cooper Foundation

1801 Austin Avenue

Waco, TX  76701

(254) 754‐0315

fax (254) 754‐7004

  

  

 
1

From: Debbie White [mailto:deb@barshconstruction.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 4:25 PM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Passenger Rail Service

  

Mr. Glavin,

  

I am writing to you today in regards to an extremely important matter and wish to express my support for passenger rail

service.  We support passenger rail service and want to encourage TXDOT to ensure Waco is connected to any future rail

system.  Passenger and freight rail service is critically important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global

competitive position.  Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s and region’s

continued economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental

concerns and safety concerns.

  

Respectfully,

  

Tate Christensen, President

Barsh Construction Company

304 Douglas Avenue

Waco, Texas 76712

254‐772‐7130

tatec@barshconstruction.com

 

 
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVRH5AAAJ&a=Print&pspid=... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

willclift@yahoo.com

Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 4:50 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Categories:Blue Category

Name: Mr. Will Clift<willclift@yahoo.com>

Address:

PO Box 1332

1332

Mount Ida, AR 71957

Phone:

(907) 242-1039

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: I will be sending you a letter for info in regards to the

up-coming meetings.

Thanks

Will Clift ME
TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)

 11 MR. E. DELAGARZA: The idea of making a --

 12 a railroad -- passenger railroad to San Antonio and up

 13 north, it's just been I've been thinking of that for

 14 many years. I'm surprised that it hasn't been done any

 15 earlier simply because I think it is one of the best

 16 things to happen to Laredo.

 17 As we know and if we study history in the

 18 1880s, railroad came to Laredo, and, if it hadn't been

 19 for the railroad train, Zapata would have been Laredo.

 20 Or the way Zapata was growing -- it was Miere or

 21 Guerrero, actually, here in Laredo across the street --

 22 that was the community that was larger than Laredo in

 23 the 1800s. But when the railroad came to Laredo, Laredo

 24 grew -- outgrew everybody along the border; and since

 25 Laredo was on the north side of the river, it became a



 5

 1 prominent railroad city.

 2 And, of course, the history shows that the

 3 railroad had a lot to do with the growth of Laredo, the

 4 growth of the area; and when we study the history, we

 5 know that Laredo was very influential and very much into

 6 the agriculture during World War I and World War II. A

 7 lot of agriculture -- and mostly vegetables, onions,

 8 cantaloupes, and watermelons, and all of that -- were

 9 taken out of Laredo by the train routes and taken to the

 10 war. The Laredo area, all of this area, was very good

 11 in providing services and produce for the community --

 12 or for the state and for the nation. So the railroad

Page 1
TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)

 13 was a very important aspect of it. Now -- and that was

 14 commercial loads, freight, whatever.

 15 Now, the passenger train can do wonders

 16 for this city considering what we have out there on the

 17 roads. The traffic, the -- the -- the huge amount of

 18 traffic (trucks and the 18-wheelers) and what have you

 19 of which Texas -- it used to take two-and-a-half hours,

 20 now it takes us longer to get to San Antonio. For

 21 example, a train will help with -- I think with

 22 passengers will help to do a lot of things.

 23 My concern was -- and I asked a while ago

 24 was, if -- if the railroad (or the government) was going

 25 to take land away from the land owners around the track,



 6

 1 which was, I think, the reason that the -- the Highway,

 2 which was the 69 or 59 project from -- that Perry had --

 3 was talking about a lot failed because he was taking too

 4 much land and not being paid the proper amount.

 5 According to this -- to this gentleman

 6 (Mark) I think he said that that might not happen

 7 because there's a different -- a different thing

 8 happening here with the train; and I hope it doesn't

 9 happen. I mean, I don't have land out there, but I

 10 would really dislike you coming and taking my land for

 11 peanuts when I've paid so much for it. So -- so I think

 12 that -- that this is good if it happens.

 13 We do really need that highway, having the

 14 rail -- the rail -- the train. We do really need a

 15 passenger train. I think the Laredo-San Antonio route

Page 2
TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)

 16 is the most straightest route that there is in any place

 17 in -- in -- in the south and USA and Texas that has

 18 prominent cities to go to and would make only a big plus

 19 to the northern states from Mexico. Put it here and it

 20 just go -- just carrying people to -- across all the way

 21 over there would make it beautiful.

 22 The other thing that I have is the area to

 23 be concerned for placing -- of course, I'm getting ahead

 24 of myself. Where are you going to -- where the station

 25 is going to be. And I'm getting ahead of myself. But I



 7

 1 think I -- I've gone through a bunch of cities, numerous

 2 cities in Mexico, for example, where they have railroad

 3 trains and they have the city here and the station is

 4 outside the city. (Indicating.) So you have to travel

 5 a lot, but there's plenty of space out there anyways,

 6 and I think it would probably be the most appropriate

 7 way to do it, just outside the city limits where you

 8 have lots of space to do parking and whatever you need

 9 to do, and that can build itself up to a better --

 10 better place to work from.

 11 So, you know, there's a whole bunch of

 12 the -- but those are things that were coming to my mind

 13 as I came here, as they was -- as I was listening to --

 14 to Mark and the young lady here today talking about it

 15 and just to let -- let you know, let Phil -- he -- know

 16 about it. Or, you know, there might be other things

 17 that I will write down anyway.

 18 Well, I have more stuff but I -- I'm just

Page 3
TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)

 19 going to stop right there.

 1 COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATION

 2 

 3 COUNTY OF BEXAR)

 4 STATE OF TEXAS )

 5 

 6 I, Dicie Lee Eytcheson, a Certified

 7 Shorthand Reporter in and for the State of Texas, do

 8 hereby certify that this transcript is as true and

 9 accurate a record as possible, transcribed by me through

 10 computer-aided transcription.

 11 And further certify that I am not a

 12 relative or employee of any of the parties hereto, nor

 13 interested directly or indirectly in the outcome of this

 14 session.

 15 WITNESS MY HAND, this the ______________

 16 day of ________________, A.D. 2013.

 17 

 18 

 19 _______________________________

 20 Dicie Lee Eytcheson, Texas CSR 5392

 Expiration Date: 12/31/14

 21 Firm Registration No. 631

 Kim Tindall & Associates, LLC

 22 645 Lockhill Selma, Suite 200

 San Antonio, Texas 78216

 23 Phone: (210) 697-3400

 Fax: (210) 697-3408

 24 

 25 



Page 4
1

Staley, Jennifer/PDX

From: Hull, Kristin/PDX

Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:08 PM

To: Steffen, Brandy/PDX

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

Kristin Hull 

Project Manager 

CH2M HILL 

2020 SW Fourth Avenue 

Portland, OR 97202 

Direct 503.736.4160 

Cell 503.360.2252 

Fax 503.223.1494 

www.ch2mhill.com

-----Original Message----- 

From: Mark Werner [mailto:Mark.Werner@txdot.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:07 PM 

To: Hull, Kristin/PDX 

Subject: Fw: TxDOT Internet E-Mail 

Kristin, here is one that didn't come in on the TOPRS site. 

________________________________________ 

From: Orlando Jamandre 

Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 2:49:06 PM 

To: Mark Werner 

Cc: mark.walbrun@ch2m.com

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E-Mail 

TOPRS comment received via AskTxDOT 

Orlando 

-----Original Message----- 

From: eglylarry@gmail.com [mailto:eglylarry@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:50 PM 

To: AskTxDOT 

Subject: TxDOT Internet E-Mail 

Name: Mr. Larry Egly<eglylarry@gmail.com> 

Address: 

 1206 Cedar Dr. 

 Killeen, TX 76543 

Phone: 

 (254) 630-9141 

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail 

Reason for Contact: Customer Service 

Complaint: No 
2

Comment: Today I read an article about TXDOT asking for comments about a potential OK to 

Dallas to San Antonio railline. 

I think it makes a lot of sense to establish a railline along those lines. 

When I go from Killeen, Tx to Joliet, IL, I take AMATRAK. It's slower, but much less 

expensive than flying. Also, I can read, play games or just relax while the train crew takes 

care of geting me to Joliet. 

Joliet, as well as other cities surrounding Chicago, utilizes the Metra rail system to 

commute in that area. The fares are very reasonable. Again, I don't have to do the driving, 

so I can read, visit with my family or just relax. 

I thinK TXDOT should study the feasibility of: 1. A high speed rail train along the route 

under consideration. 2. A normal speed train along the route. 3. What will be the costs of 

running either 1 or 2 above on their own dedicated rail line. I say this because AMTRAK uses 

other railroads tracks, so sometimes its passengers have to wait on a siding so the railroad 

that owns the line can use it. 

A rail line will be more environmenatally friendly than individuals driving their cars on the 

same route. 

I think that it is great that TX is considering doing this study. I hope that the oil 

industry is not allowed to scuttle the idea because they would probably sell less gas if TX 

developed such a rail line. 

Be Safe. Drive Smart. 


TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)

 16 is the most straightest route that there is in any place

 20 MR. J. GARCIA: Yeah. About four years

 21 ago I started an interest in -- in getting a train to

 22 south Texas. I wrote quite a few letters to Senator

 23 Henry Cuellar and, also, to Amtrak querying why we

 24 didn't have any trains in south Texas when all of the

 25 rest of the state had trains that left from San Antonio



 8

 1 to El Paso to Dallas to Houston, but nothing was coming

 2 out to south Texas. So I think this is an important

 3 part of our transportation system that is critically

 4 needed, especially with the growth in population of

 5 Laredo and some of the other southern border -- cities

 6 along the border.

 7 One of my suggestions at that time was to

 8 run a train, believe it or not, from San Antonio to

 9 Laredo to Corpus, back up to San Antonio, but on my --

 10 my thinking on this was to have a monorail system. And

 11 my reasoning for that was because of the huge amount of

 12 traffic that is now in Cotulla, and most of the south

 13 Texas area, with this oil boom that's just recently

 14 happened here, this would avoid any kind of delays, any

 15 kind of possible, I want to say -- what was it? -- like

 16 a -- any -- any kind of hazard or any kind of trash or

 17 anything that may occur on these -- during the transit

 18 between here and San Antonio.

 19 So by providing a monorail system it would

 20 lift the train up and over all of this that's happening

 21 already in this area. It'll relieve the area hunters

Page 3
TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)

 22 that are hunting, that have huge ranch and investments

 23 in hunting here, also, the problem that we have with the

 24 immigration problem that's -- we have encountered on a

 25 daily basis with immigrants jumping on trains trying to



 9

 1 find a way to use the trains as a vehicle to go north

 2 without proper clearance of immigration. I think all of

 3 this was important things that I used as bullet points

 4 when I was addressing this issue two or three years ago.

 5 Nothing has changed in these issues except that it's

 6 been compounded and that also with this are drug

 7 concerns, the movement of drugs between Laredo and north

 8 Texas or, I should say, deep south Texas to north Texas.

 9 So while I embrace the fact that the train

 10 is coming to south Texas again, those are some of my

 11 concerns and issues that I'd like to address at this

 12 time.

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

Page 4
TXDOT Open House - Texas to Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (4_3_2013)

 25 



 10

 1 COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATION

 2 

 3 COUNTY OF BEXAR)

 4 STATE OF TEXAS )

 5 

 6 I, Dicie Lee Eytcheson, a Certified

 7 Shorthand Reporter in and for the State of Texas, do

 8 hereby certify that this transcript is as true and

 9 accurate a record as possible, transcribed by me through

 10 computer-aided transcription.

 11 And further certify that I am not a

 12 relative or employee of any of the parties hereto, nor

 13 interested directly or indirectly in the outcome of this

 14 session.

 15 WITNESS MY HAND, this the ______________

 16 day of ________________, A.D. 2013.

 17 

 18 

 19 _______________________________

 20 Dicie Lee Eytcheson, Texas CSR 5392

 Expiration Date: 12/31/14

 21 Firm Registration No. 631

 Kim Tindall & Associates, LLC

 22 645 Lockhill Selma, Suite 200

 San Antonio, Texas 78216

 23 Phone: (210) 697-3400

 Fax: (210) 697-3408

 24 

 25 



Page 5
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVymgAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=... 1/2

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

susan_garry@hotmail.com

Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 6:34 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Categories:Blue Category

Name: Ms. Susan Garry<susan_garry@hotmail.com>

Address:

2200 County Rd. 458

Coupland, TX 78615

Phone:

(512) -

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: This is a comment for the TxOkla.rail scoping study. I agree

with Mickey Burleson, who has pointed out: Texans are not ready for high

speed rail and an investment in same will prove a waste of taxpayer money,

agency time and effort. Current ridership on Amtrak is not high and is

lower than publicized figures indicate. Amtrak counts each entry and each

exit as a separate rider; so publicized numbers are skewed. If current

service included more trains, better facilities on board (and at stations)

and rates that beat the cost of gas for auto travel, then Texans might

prefer the inconvenience of public transportation. If we can take our

cars for the same or less money, we will. If we’re in a big hurry we

will prefer plane travel. Accurate projected ridership is critical to

making a wise decision about such a project , and national surveys have

shown that time and again eventual usage of recently completed toll roads

and rails has been much lower than predicted; so we cannot rely on

ridership predictions. The most costly environmental damage of a bullet

train would be the destruction of prime farmland. A new route would

likely be built through the Blackland Prairie ecoregion, home of the most

productive soil in Texas and the most severely impacted by development in

our nation. The same projected population increase TxDOT claims would

necessitate something like a bullet train would also necessitate

production of more food and would require use of every inch of arable soil

the world has to offer. Since all the world’s arable soil is already in
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVymgAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=... 2/2

production, there would be serious competition we cannot responsibly

ignore for the thousands of acres a bullet train would consume. If this

is to be an electric train, there would be still more productive land

gobbled up by new transmission lines coming in to the route at points

along the way, and this loss and construction should be factored in to

overall financial and environmental costs. Because of shrink/swell

characteristics of soils of the Blackland Prairie and hazards they cause

to road and rail beds, soils will have to be removed and rock brought in

to guarantee a smooth railbed. Nearest sources for rock will be the Hill

Country where further lands will be environmentally degraded. Hauling

hundreds of truckloads of rock required will do costly damage to roads,

many of which are county-maintained. These activities cause off-site

damage which must be factored into costs and losses resulting from the

project. Valuable wetlands and exceptionally rare tallgrass prairie

plant communities will be destroyed and cannot be replaced. Wildlife on

the Blackland is already scarce and impacted severely by development.

Corridors that permit wildlife movement to water and food will be blocked

and their numbers greatly decreased. Crossings will be limited and many

roads blocked because of the expense of construction. This will also

negatively impact rural residents and school bus travelers.
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVpteAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/2

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

groffjh@cableone.net

Sent:Sunday, April 21, 2013 6:19 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Mr. Horace Groff<groffjh@cableone.net>

Address:

203 Rolling Acres Rd.

Denison, TX 75021

Phone:

(903) 465-0954

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: As a former public official I an very much aware of the impact of

Texas population growth is having on our transportation system. No one

wants to increase fuel taxes, motor vehicles are mandated to be more fuel

efficient and the cost of building and maintaining the highway system

makes it impossible for government to keep pace with the demands for an

efficient transportation system.

An efficient and convient rail system will do much to relieve the current

and future congestion in many areas of our state. Rail travel will also

give the traveling public another option to avoid the congestion and

hassel of air travel.

I urge the pursuit of this project and look forward to it's completion and

implementation. Texas needs a modern passenger rail system.
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVpteAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 2/2
1

From: Christopher Gutierrez, CCIM [mailto:txlandinfo@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 5:46 PM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Support for Texas Passenger Rail and a Waco Hub

 

Mr. Gavin,

I am a very active player in Regional Economic Development. Please note my support for passenger rail service. Not 

only is passenger and freight rail service critically important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global 

competitive position, it is an essential reliever to the overburdened TXDOT highway system.

Connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the Waco community, as well as the region’s continued 

economic growth. Given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental concerns, and safety concerns, it is 

absolutely essential that the passenger rail service from Oklahoma to South Texas become a reality and most importantly 

that there specifically be a Waco Junction serving as a hub to our region.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Christopher H. Gutierrez, CCIM

Texas Commercial & Industrial

Real Estate Services, Inc.

1620-F W. Loop 340 Suite 10

Waco, Texas 76712-6838

PHONE: 254-744-8016

FAX: 214-481-0330 

txlandinfo@sbcglobal.net

www.texcomrealestate.com

Information provided herein is from sources deemed reliable. 

However, TCIRES and its affiliates are not liable for its precise

accuracy or effectiveness. All information is subject to change.

 


5/6/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&a=Open&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAA... 1/1

To: TXOKRAIL

Reply Reply All Forward

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

amheithaus@sbcglobal.net

Friday, April 26, 2013 10:40 AM

Name: Ms. Autumn Heithaus<amheithaus@sbcglobal.net>

Address:

11807 Birch

Wichita, KS 67212

Phone:

(316) 721-3387

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: I am in total support for Texas to take further steps to

advance

the current Heartland Flyer from Ft Worth - Ok City north through

Wichita

and connect in Newton to the SW Chief. Since 2006, I, with Mr.

Evan Stair

from Norman, OK, started the organization, the Northern Flyer

Alliance. We

have been working together to build support for bringing passenger

rail

service up through the I-35 Corridor for the past seven years. The

City of

Wichita has taken over our efforts to support this initiative and

our

Kansas Legislators really want passenger rail service to expand

from

Newton, KS through Oklahoma and the State of Texas. The support

exist in

Kansas by our citizens & many of us in Kansas want this! I have

collected

many Resolutions over the years from Kansas organizations and

cities that

support passenger rail service along the I-35 Corridor. I will

help you in

anyway that I can to build this goal and bring passenger rail

service to



For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in

Acrobat 9 or Adobe Reader 9, or later.

Get Adobe Reader Now!
4/25/13 RE: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVebsAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/2

RE: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

Kristin.Hull@CH2M.com

Sent:Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:55 AM

To: TXOKRAIL; Brandy.Steffen@CH2M.com

I called Shana back on 3/27. Left a message.

Kristin Hull

Project Manager

CH2M HILL

2020 SW Fourth Avenue

Portland, OR 97202

Direct 503.736.4160

Cell 503.360.2252

Fax 503.223.1494

www.ch2mhill.com

-----Original Message-----

From: TXOKRAIL [mailto:TXOKRAIL@txdot.gov]

Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 2:18 PM

To: Steffen, Brandy/PDX

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

________________________________________

From: shana.horton@gmail.com [shana.horton@gmail.com]

Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 4:26 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Subject: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

Name: Ms. Shana Horton<shana.horton@gmail.com>

Address:

505 W. 7th #318

Austin, TX 78701

Phone:

(512) 573-3670

Requested Contact Method: Phone

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No
4/25/13 RE: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVebsAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 2/2

Comment: Dear Sir or Madam:

I would like to receive a phone call from someone who can give me details regarding the specific routes under

consideration for the Texas-Oklahoma Rail line(s).

Thank you,

Shana Horton

Be Safe. Drive Smart
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVUdcAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

shana.horton@gmail.com

Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 4:13 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Categories:Blue Category

Name: Ms. Shana Horton<shana.horton@gmail.com>

Address:

505 W. 7th #318

Austin, TX 78701

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: Dear Sir or Madam:

I am looking for a map that shows all proposed rail routes with county

lines and highways, if possible. The map on the website does not have any

county lines or highways, making it difficult to tell which property might

be impacted.

Thank you,

Shana Horton
1







From: Monte Hulse [mailto:mhulse@fnbct.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 8:49 AM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Rail Service

  

Director Galvin,

  

Please accept this letter as support for rail service, both passenger and freight, for Waco and Central Texas.

It is vital for our economic growth. We have limited air service and our roads are congested hampered by environmental

and safety concerns.

Thank you for your support in making sure Waco is connected to any rail lines proposed through our area.

  

Monte Hulse CEO

First National Bank of Central Texas

Waco, TX 76710

 
4/25/13 RE: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlyAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVrtsAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_1... 1/2

RE: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

TXOKRAIL

Sent:Sunday, April 21, 2013 7:49 PM

To: whumm@att.net

Mr. HummThank you for your comment. The data in the purpose and need statement that you refer to can be found in

"Potential Development of an Intercity Passenger Transit System in Texas - Final Report" by the Texas

Transportation Institute, May 2010.

The report is available online at http://tti.tamu.edu/publications/catalog/record/?id=32702.

Sincerely,

The Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Team

________________________________________

From: whumm@att.net [whumm@att.net]

Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 4:57 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Subject: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

Name: Mr. William Humm<whumm@att.net>

Address:

172 Rieti Drive

Crowley, TX 76036

Requested Contact Method: Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: Please send me the studies and data that support the statements

included in the Service Level Environmental Impact Statement for the Texas

Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Corridor, South Texas to Oklahoma City,

Notice by the Federal Railroad Administration on 03/13/2013 as cited

below:

Projections for the Dallas/Fort Worth to San Antonio portion of the

corridor show average speeds along I-35 would drop from 55 to 15 miles per

hour by 2035.

The central section, via existing I-35, is characterized by substantially

higher automobile and truck volumes than any other intercity corridor in

the state. These volumes are projected to increase steadily through 2035,
4/25/13 RE: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlyAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVrtsAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_1... 2/2

by which time traffic volumes are projected to result in freeway speeds as

low as 15 miles per hour, contributing to very substantial delays.

Thank you for your assistance.


4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVecEAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

lkelly13@yahoo.com

Sent:Wednesday, April 03, 2013 7:56 AM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Ms. Lydia Kelly<lkelly13@yahoo.com>

Address:

2617 Roosevelt Ave

San Antonio, TX 78214

Phone:

(210) 857-7461

Requested Contact Method:

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: I would like to be included on emails that have to do with public

involvement opportunities on all things transportation in the SA-BC MPO

region. I'm retiring and won't have access to the info from work; but

want to stay involved. Thanks
1

From: Peter Kultgen [mailto:pkatbk@bkford.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 3:03 PM 

To: 'bill.glavin@txdot.gov' 

Cc: 'mark.werner@texdot.gov' 

Subject: Passenger Rail Service

  

Gentlemen – I would urge that Waco along with the other major cities in Central Texas be included in whatever

configuration of passenger rail the TexDot study is considering.  As our community continues to grow and with its central

location it is very important that we have access to any such passenger route.  The further benefit of helping to relieve

congestion on I‐35 should help save the State of Texas money in the long run.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely

Peter Kultgen, President, Bird‐Kultgen Ford, Waco

 
2
1

Staley, Jennifer/PDX

From: Hull, Kristin/PDX

Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:06 AM

To: Steffen, Brandy/PDX

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

For the scoping record 

Kristin Hull 

Project Manager 

CH2M HILL 

2020 SW Fourth Avenue 

Portland, OR 97202 

Direct 503.736.4160 

Cell 503.360.2252 

Fax 503.223.1494 

www.ch2mhill.com

-----Original Message----- 

From: Mark Werner [mailto:Mark.Werner@txdot.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:29 AM 

To: Hull, Kristin/PDX; Hausknecht, Brian/SDO 

Cc: Walbrun, Mark/DFW; Jennifer Moczygemba 

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E-Mail 

FYI 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Orlando Jamandre 

Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 11:11 AM 

To: Mark Werner 

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E-Mail 

TOPRS comment 

Orlando 

-----Original Message----- 

From: terilanc@gmail.com [mailto:terilanc@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:05 AM 

To: AskTxDOT 

Subject: TxDOT Internet E-Mail 

Name: Mr. Terry Lancaster<terilanc@gmail.com> 

Address: 1200 E. Main 

Teague, TX 75860 

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail 

Reason for Contact: Customer Service 

Complaint: No 

Comment: I am a native Texan-senior, retired. I'm sorry but Texas just does not have what it 

takes to develop a large project such as this. The Super Collider and Trans-Texas projects 

all merely drained millions of tax dollars from other doable causes. Do we need mass 
2

transit? Yes, definitely, but we needed it 30 years ago. Only way to do it would be to 

lease the overhead rights from existing railroads like BNSF and connect DFW to Houston-San 

Antonio. Do the large metropolitan areas first and plan for later connections to outlying 

centers like Austin & Waco, etc, later, possibly with a trunk line connection. P.S. I am exrailroader for 

l5 years. 

Be Safe. Drive Smart 




































1

From: Jeff Lee [mailto:Jeff.Lee@memberschoicectfcu.org] 

Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 9:45 AM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Passenger Rail Service 

Importance: High

  

Dear Mr. Glavin, 

I am one of the executives for Members Choice Credit Union in Waco, TX. Our organization enjoys a 

membership base of 30,000+ members and I would like to communicate to you that Waco would be able to 

support passenger rail service. I agree with my peers that passenger and freight rail service is critically 

important to maintaining the state’s enviable national and global competitive position. 

Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s and region’s continued 

economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental 

concerns, and safety concerns. 

Waco is in a nice position with easy access to major cities and must be included in the vision. As we examine 

our future growth for Waco, this must be in the plan. 

In advance, thank you for your review of my correspondence to you and your team. 

 

Kindest regards, 

Jeff Lee 

Executive Vice President 

Members Choice Credit Union 

DISCLAIMER NOTICE

This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual 
2

or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential 

and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 

distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise 

the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

Protect yourself from online fraud: Fraud is a serious issue, and we want to make sure your account 

information stays secure. Never email your personal or account information, we will never ask you to. Do 

not download email attachments, we will never send you any. Keep your password secure, and never 

share your passwords with anyone. Act quickly if you feel you have been a victim of fraud, please call the 

credit union immediately.

 
1

From: Stefan LeRow [mailto:slerow@capstonemechanical.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 10:57 AM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Waco support for passenger rail service

  

Mr. Glavin –

  

As a resident of Waco, TX and frequent traveler on IH‐35, I strongly support the proposed passenger rail system from

Oklahoma City to Laredo, TX. If economically feasible, I would love Waco to be included in the routing of this service.  

  

Please let me know how I can support your efforts in making this idea a reality.

  

Stefan LeRow | Sr. VP Project Operations| Capstone Mechanical

Office 254.537.9026 | Fax 254.399.8085

7100 Imperial Drive, Waco, TX 76712

www.capstonemechanical.com

 

This e-mail may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any distribution or other use is strictly 

prohibited. 

If you have received this e-mail message in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this email from all 

computers.

  

 

1

‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 

From: Carlos Lopez ‐ CALOPEZ [mailto:calopez@wal‐mart.com]

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:44 AM

To: bill.gavin@txdot.gov

Cc: Mark Werner

Subject: Support for passenger rail service

I support the passenger Rail Service from Oklahoma City to South Texas.

Carlos Lopez

Market Manager‐ Wa‐Mart

C/O Wal‐mart #1254

1521 I‐35 East

Bellmead, Tx. 76705

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the

individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error

destroy it immediately. *** Walmart Confidential ***

Talk. Text. Crash.

[Talk. Text. Crash.]<http://www.txdot.gov/inside‐txdot/division/traffic/safety/share‐

road/distracted.html>
1

‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 

From: kathrynlucchese@mac.com [mailto:kathrynlucchese@mac.com]

Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 10:18 PM

To: AskTxDOT

Subject: TxDOT Internet E‐Mail

Name: Ms. Kathryn Lucchese<kathrynlucchese@mac.com>

Address:

1008 Puryear Drive

College Station, TX 77840

Phone:

(979) 764‐7505

Requested Contact Method: E‐Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: I understand that there will be some discussion this week of a passenger rail line

between Oklahoma and Houston, and I just wanted to beg for a stop (again) in College Station

and a connection with the Bush Intercontinental Airport.

We spend endless hours driving back and forth between these two locations, and when returning

from abroad from conferences and research it is exhausting to have to drive another two hours

to get home.

The air pollution in Houston and frequent traffic snarls argue for a train line, as well.  I

also believe we would visit Dallas/Ft Worth more often if we did not have drive so long to do

so.  Reading, doing work or grading papers are all things that can be done when not driving ‐

‐ not to mention napping safely!

Thank you for your consideration of the public interest and increased productivity!

Kate Lucchese

Educator & Author




5/6/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&a=Open&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAA... 1/1

To: TXOKRAIL

Reply Reply All Forward

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

jomcke49@yahoo.com

Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:46 PM

Name: Mr. john mckenzie<jomcke49@yahoo.com>

Address:

223 E. Fordyce

kingsville, TX 78363

Phone:

(361) 455-4035

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: I hope the passenger train service to south tx does

happen. I

remember when south tx had a passenger train which ran from Houston

to

Brownsville up until April 1966. Ridership was high but the

Missouri

Pacific wanted out of the passenger business. People will ride the

train.

Major cities along the way will benefit. It will be a great and

safe

alternative to the congested highways. There are a number of

colleges as

well as military installations along the route. I believe

passenger train

service will be a wise investment for Texas' future. We need it.
1

From: Matt Meadors [mailto:mmeadors@wacochamber.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:21 PM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Texas - Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study

  

Dear Director Glavin;

  

I am writing on behalf of the Greater Waco Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors and the organization’s

approximately 1,600 member firms to express the Chamber’s strong support for expanded rail service in Texas, and to

ask the Texas Department of Transportation to ensure that Waco is connected to future rail systems.

  

Waco enjoys a diversified and growing economy, excellent natural resources, outstanding educational institutions,

world‐class business and industrial parks, unified and visionary leadership, and much more.  The community’s physical

location along the dynamic I‐35 corridor, situated halfway between Austin and Dallas, is enviable.  However, our great

location has also created a number of challenges.  The I‐35 corridor is heavily congested, impeding the efficient

movement of people and goods, and creating safety and environmental quality concerns.  Further, we have limited

access to air service.   

  

Access to a modern, efficient rail system will help address these challenges and position Waco and central Texas for

continued economic growth into the future.

  

We wish you and your team much success with the current study.  Please feel free to contact me if I may be of

assistance.

  

Sincerely,

  

Matt

  

    

  

Matthew T. Meadors | President/CEO 

Greater Waco Chamber | 101 S. Third St. Waco, TX 76701 

Phone: (254) 757‐5623 | Fax: (254) 757‐5639 

WacoChamber.com

  

 
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVebrAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

dgm@tx.rr.com

Sent:Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:23 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Mr. David Meer<dgm@tx.rr.com>

Address:

6305 Stonehill

Dallas, TX 75254

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: NBC News mentioned funds to develop a rail line from Ok to south

Tx, running through Dallas with stop in Waco.

We have family and grandchildren in Waco, so we would be VERY interested

in this route, depending on time, days avail, and time of this segment.

Thank you,

David Meer
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVptaAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

jhmonroe73@cox.net

Sent:Friday, April 19, 2013 4:42 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Mr. James Monroe<jhmonroe73@cox.net>

Address:

210 S Vine St

Wichita, KS 67213

Phone:

(316) 263-3855

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: I am a former Railway Mail Clerk. Moved up here from Texas in

1950. All my family, brothers and sisters, live in Texas and I am too old

to drive. If they would put the train back on like it was in 1950, Newton

& Ft Worth, I would be able to visit My Brother in San Antonio, Bro. in Ft

Worth, sister in Waco, sister in Houston. I have relatives all over

Texas. There are weddings, graduations, funerals, etc. I would like to

attend.
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVj5vAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_1... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

maryp142011@hotmail.com

Sent:Wednesday, April 03, 2013 2:25 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Ms. Mary Morales<maryp142011@hotmail.com>

Address:

5218 Salvador Ln.

Zapata, TX 78076

Phone:

(956) 765-6668

Requested Contact Method:

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: Thank you,thank thank you, thank you for the possibility of

getting passenger rail service to South Texas. I rode the train all the

way to St. Louis, MO when Laredo had AMTRAK service. Since Laredo is the

largest inland port in the USA, I feel that there must be a lot of

potential passengers who would use the service. I have relatives in

Oklahoma City, Ft. Worth and Missouri whom I am sure would use the service

if available. I know I would. Air travel has gotten so burdensome. I am

68 years old, white haired and have had a knee replacement. It is getting

more and more difficult to deal with the TSA pat downs. I know if I had

the choice of train travel or plane travel, I would much prefer the train.

Again, thank you for this forum. God's best to you and all who are

working on this great undertaking for the central-southern United States

of America. Sincerely, Mary Morales
1

Staley, Jennifer/PDX

From: Mark Werner [Mark.Werner@txdot.gov]

Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 8:24 AM

To: Hull, Kristin/PDX; Hausknecht, Brian/SDO; Walbrun, Mark/DFW; Steffen, Brandy/PDX

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

And another. 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Jefferson Grimes 

Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 10:21 AM 

To: Mark Werner 

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E-Mail 

I just received this and am forwarding it to you for inclusion in the public comments. Thnx 

Jefferson Grimes 

Director 

Office of Public Involvement 

Texas Department of Transportation 

Phone: (512) 475-3097 

Cell: (512) 415-2672 

-----Original Message----- 

From: cr8joy@charter.net [mailto:cr8joy@charter.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 6:54 AM 

To: Jefferson Grimes 

Subject: TxDOT Internet E-Mail 

Name: Ms. Rene Muhl<cr8joy@charter.net> 

Address: 

 3832 Heywood Ave 

 Fort Worth, TX 76109 

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail 

Reason for Contact: Customer Service 

Complaint: No 

Comment: I am definitely in favor of creating a rail transportation system throughout Texas 

and especially from Ft Worth to Denton and Oklahoma. 

I-35 is so congested and a rail system would go a long way to help alleviate the problem. 

The rail should also include transportation from Ft Worth to San Antonio and beyond. 

Be Safe. Drive Smart. 
4/25/13 RE: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlyAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVa%2bvAAAJ&a=Print&pspid... 1/2

RE: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

TXOKRAIL

Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 4:16 PM

To: tien.nguyen@senerusa.com

Categories: Blue Category

Attachments:TOPRS Poster - 3.7.13.pdf (2 MB)

Hello Tien,

Thank you for your comment! You are correct, the Dallas meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 3, 2013 (not

Thursday). We will correct the date on the website and send out a reminder email to our mailing list ASAP! I've

attached a poster with all of the open house dates.

Thanks again for alerting us of the mistake and we hope to see you at the Dallas open house.

Sincerely,

Brandy

________________________________________

From: tien.nguyen@senerusa.com [tien.nguyen@senerusa.com]

Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 12:35 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Subject: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

Name: Mr. tien nguyen<tien.nguyen@senerusa.com>

Address:

100 montgomery street

Suite 2190

San Francisco, CA 94104

Phone:

(415) 391-3158

Requested Contact Method: Phone

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: The date for the Dallas Public Scoping Meeting is Wednesday April

3, 2013 , not Thursday April 3, 2013 ?

Thursday should be April 4, 2013.

Please, verify
4/25/13 RE: TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlyAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVa%2bvAAAJ&a=Print&pspid... 2/2

Thank you
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVmlfAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

cartolive@aol.com

Sent:Wednesday, April 10, 2013 2:37 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Mr. carlos oliveira<cartolive@aol.com>

Address:

7917 mcpherson ste 207

laredo, TX 78045

Phone:

(956) 727-3801

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: the I 35 corridor is becoming a very busy high way

(CARS,TRUCKS,EAGLEDORD SHELL PROVIDING SERVICE TRUCKS) AND THE AIR SERVICE

PROVIDESUS WITH A VERY LIMITED CHOICE. WE ARE IN NEED OF ANOTHER FORM OF

TRANSPORTATION, THE SPEED RAIL IS THE MOST FEASIBLE... THANK YOU
2

‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 

From: AskTxDOT  

Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:07 AM

To: Bill Glavin; Orlando Jamandre

Subject: FW: TxDOT Internet E‐Mail

We received the attached message through TxDOT's website.  It is forwarded for your handling.   

Thank you for your help.

TxDOT Communications

‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 

From: pingpaul@austin.rr.com [mailto:pingpaul@austin.rr.com]  

Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:52 AM

To: AskTxDOT

Subject: TxDOT Internet E‐Mail

Name: Mr. Paul McKelvey<pingpaul@austin.rr.com>

Address:

1207 Red Ranch Circle

Cedar Park, TX 78613

Phone:

(512) 250‐3452

Requested Contact Method: E‐Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: Re: Oklahoma‐South Texas Passenger Rail If the problem we are trying to solve is congestion on I‐

35, passenger rail is not the way to solve it. To be effective, passenger rail has to serve the state's major

population centers. A north‐south line from Oklahoma to South Texas misses Houston, the state's largest city.

The congestion is most closely related to the number of trucks making a north‐south transit of the state on IH‐

35. Putting those on the railroad is the most cost‐effective way to deal with the problem. While passengers

and trucks both require timely service, the cost of providing timely service for trucks in lower. The rolling stock

already exists and the means of production are in place. Additional cars could readily be built using American

labor.

For passenger service, the rolling stock does not exist and would have to be built. Typically, this means

importing cars from other countries that have production facilities. American labor gets cut out. Texas jobs are

involved.

Freight service rolling stock requires far less maintenance than does passenger rolling stock, another savings.

Timely service is a major consideration. To make the deal attractive, the transit time from South Texas to

Oklahoma should be quicker than truck transit time over the same distance. This will require cooperation

between rail lines and unions, but nothing they have not already done with the traffic between Los Angeles‐
3

Long Beach and the Port of New York‐New Jersey. It used to take 2 weeks for a rail car to cross Chicago due to

interlining requirements. Today, trains regularly make a 72‐hour coast to coast run.

I like passenger rail, but it has to connect major population centers ‐ Houston, San Antonio ‐ first. It has to be

faster than driving a car to attract sufficient customers. It has to be safe. There should be no crossings at grade

anywhere.

Most of the passenger traffic on IH‐35 appears to be intra‐county and intra‐state. Campo appears to be

developing a solution for that traffic.

Freight moved from rail largely because trucks could provide better service. They could because rail lines were

not customer‐oriented.  

Truckers were. The organization and technologies for rapid rail freight have arrived. We should play to those

strengths rather than spend money on a passenger rail line for which there is mainly hope, not established

traffic.

4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVmlgAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

pichot@netscorp.net

Sent:Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:59 AM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Ms. Tom Pichot<pichot@netscorp.net>

Address:

2202 Lyon St

Laredo

Texas 78043

Laredo, TX 78043

Phone:

(956) 220-3053

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: We fly to Okla City about five times per year. We need high speed

trains shoud we change. We also travel to Hondo Tex forty miles west of

San Antonio about eight to ten times a year. Again High Speed is

necessary.

Tom Pichot
1

From: Parker Pieri [mailto:Parker.Pieri@dwyergroup.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:24 AM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Passenger Rail Service

  

Mr. Glavin, 

It has come to my attention that the state of Texas will be conducting a study on a proposed passenger rail line 

from Oklahoma to South Texas. Passenger (& freight) rail service is very important to keeping the state of 

Texas competitive in the regional, national, & international economy. It is vital that Waco be connected to 

these rail systems so that the greater Waco community can continue its economic growth, especially given the 

communities limited access to air service, congested roads, and safety & environmental concerns. 

If you have any questions or would like additional input, please do not hesitate to contact me.

  

Thank you for your time and consideration to this matter.

  

Best Regards,

  

Parker F. Pieri, CFE

Director of Finance

The Dwyer Group
2

Phone: (254) 745-2409

Fax: (254) 745-2495

  

Featured Code of Value:

We believe in counting our blessings every day in every way!

  

  

* CFE (Certified Franchise Executive) is a certification bestowed upon qualifying individuals by the International Franchise Association.

NOTICE: The information contained in this email (including any attachments) may be confidential and/or legally 

privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an 

intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, 

distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received 

this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original 

message (including any attachments). Thank you.

  

The information contained in this email message and any attachments may contain legally privileged, private and/or confidential information which may be 

protected by state and federal law. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are 

hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly 

prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately by return email and destroy all copies of the original message and 

information. Thank you.

 

5/6/13 TxOkpassenger rail public comments atten. MarkWerner.

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&a=Open&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAA... 1/1

To:

Attachments:

TXOKRAIL

TXOK pass rail.pdf (219 KB) [O pen in Browser]

Reply Reply All Forward

TxOk passenger rail public comments atten. Mark Werner.

Robert Pulliam [tubularrail@aol.com]

Thursday, April 25, 2013 5:33 PM

Mark, for the comment section per Federal Register

Robert Pulliam

Tubular Rail Inc.

Houston TX

713 834 7905c

713 681 9501

www.tubularrail.com
Tubular Rail, Inc.

5000 Milwee, Suite 43

Houston, TX 77092

713-681-9501

www.tubularrail.com

info@tubularrail.com

Mr. Mark Werner, 

Project Manager, TxDOT

125 E. 11th Street, 

Austin, TX 78701–2483

Mr. Werner.

As you know, we are interested in working with TxDOT as the department develops plans for the 

I-35 Corridor. We would seek the evaluation of Tubular Rail’s Drive on Drive off Truck Ferry 

(DDF) patented concept for the Oklahoma City to Rio Grande Valley alignment. Our hypothesis 

is simple; that development of the DDF will yield benefits to public safety, lower congestion 

levels and highway maintenance costs; create economic benefits for shippers and carriers through 

lower shipping and operating costs and is environmentally beneficial. Our claim, which we seek 

to have evaluated by or in conjunction with the TxDOT, is that the system will produce sufficient 

revenue to cover capital and operating costs, thus at least solving part of the highway funding 

issue and producing usable rail for passenger applications.
At the end of March I made a fact finding trip through Kansas and Missouri evaluating 

acceptance and need. The transportation challenges faced in that part of the country differ from 

those in Texas only by geography and the below summation is based on comments and concerns 

we heard expressed from, elected officials, railroads, private industry associations and the 

Missouri Department of Transportation. While the Kansas conversations centered on passenger 

rail and the need for funding to maintain Amtrak’s Southwest Chief ($100 million requested by 

BNSF), the Missouri discussions were very much about highway issues, particularly funding. 

In Kansas, which has the third most miles of railroads after Texas and Illinois, we found a 

growing resignation amongst elected officials that the State will most likely lose the Southwest 

Chief, Amtrak’s long distance train from Chicago to Los Angeles with several stops in Kansas. 

Currently running on a BNSF line roughly paralleling the BNSF’s TransCon through Kansas, the 

Southwest Chief needs a cash infusion to maintain this line at a track class that can accommodate 

79mph speeds for passenger travel. BNSF’s freight on the line is not sufficient in volume nor is it 

time sensitive enough for the railroad to make the necessary investment. Politically, it is unlikely 

that the three states will collectively come up with the 100 million dollars plus 10 million 

annually to keep the once daily train running on this route. It is likely to be diverted through 

Oklahoma and Texas on a less direct route and merged with another train.

The situation is of interest to Tubular Rail as this is the very type of situation that the DDF could 

assist Amtrak’s operations as the line has current capacity but would need upgrading for DDF 

operations yet allowing passenger type use to continue. In conjunction with trackage in Missouri 

and Colorado, a continuous 700 mile segment could be assembled. 

In the last two weeks the Missouri Senate has passed a one percent increase in the State’s sales 

tax, at writing the measure is before the Missouri House of Representatives. If passed there, the 

measure would then go to the voters in 2014 and an uncertain outcome.

As written, the revenues from this measure are to be dedicated to transportation. Adding a lane in 

each direction to I-70 is estimated to cost 3 billion dollars. What is not clear is if the sales tax 

measure will produce enough funds during its ten year life to meet I-70’s needs as well as other 

areas of the state. What is certain is that the Dedicated Trucks Lanes project will not proceed as a 

toll road.
Missouri’s rail picture is much more complicated than that found in Kansas but current active rail 

lines total 2500 miles less than the state had at its peak. We have identified some trackage that 

could be part of a tri-state system.

In meeting with the Missouri DOT we learned that their biggest problem is that of funding. 

While there had been high hopes for the four state Dedicated Truck Lanes project, political reality 

has set in and hopes are now pinned on the sales tax measure. 

Two of the MoDOT personnel in the meeting dealt with trucking issues on a regular basis and 

were thus well versed on some of the Hours of Service issues as well as the overall commercial 

driver shortage. The other personnel were more from the planning side of transportation and had 

many question and comments on how a DDF project would impact existing traffic and if there 

was enough volume of longer haul trucks to be cost effective. We hope the MoDOT will be part 

of that evaluation. 

The brief outline below is taken from the DDF Proposal/concept paper. 

 Implementation Issues:

o Legal, particularly eminent domain and restoration of abandoned rail ROW’s;

o Political;

o Financing-revenues from truck, rail, and business related to ROW (fiber optics, 

pipeline etc.)

o Partners: State DOT’s, FRA, US DOT, STB;

o Competition;

o Regulatory;

o Coalition Building;

o Business Model emphasizing a more limited Governmental role;

o Developmental and Organizational issues, including ownership, operations and 

governmental issues;

o Inertia

 External Benefits:

o Restoration of standard freight service;

o Risk Factors;

o Environmental pros and cons;

o Loss of fuel tax revenue vs. lower maintenance;

o HAZMAT;
o Towns with restored rail service;

o Development ideas, explaining how to develop the system from concept 

through construction and operation;

o Supportive of short range, alternative- fuel trucks. (fuel cell, battery, etc.)



 Technical Issues:

o 45 to 50 mph average speed;

o Requires class 3 track standard;

o Engineering and selection of Design Build contractors;

o Operator, operations, and potential customer inputs for types of service;

o Engineering survey of existing conditions and obstructions;

o Identify tasks, assign priorities, and determine responsibilities;

o Width in cities and loop bypasses, economic development for impacted areas;

o Location – determining what areas have both demand and available 

rail assets;

o Prototyping of two full scale cars and testing

These issues are a place to start a feasibility assessment. We are sure there are more that will be 

raised but the unconventionality of the DDF approach must be viewed in light of the current 

situation and what forecasts are predicting for the future, both freight and climate.

Much attention has been paid in recent years to the Public Private Partnership PPP approach to 

infrastructure needs. We don’t disagree that there are huge reserves of funds available for 

investment but if Governmental agencies want to tap these funds they must present options to 

investors that make sense to both the investment community and the public as well. In 

proposing the development of the DDF we seek a Partnership at the low cost “front end” and in 

so doing establish an approach that will lower risk levels prior to implementation. We also 

develop efficiencies over current transport methods to produce a revenue stream that actually 

lowers user’s costs rather than raising them. 

Sincerely,
Robert Pulliam

Tubular Rail Inc.

Houston TX 
1

From: James Recks [mailto:jrecks@j-hawk.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:39 AM 

To: Bill Glavin; Mark Werner 

Subject: TxDot Rail Service in Texas

  

Bill and Mark,

  

I understand that the Great State of Texas recently received a grant to study expanded rail service in Texas.  As a

business person in Waco who travels I‐35, I appreciate the amount of planning and effort TxDot expends to try to keep

pace with the growing Texas population and its transportation needs.  Let me say THANK YOU for all the great work you

are doing.

  

May I also say that the residents of Waco are 100% in favor of your possible rail service expansion and we in Waco want

and need to be a stop  on any proposed line!

Keep Waco in mind and keep up the good work!

  

Best regards,

  

James Recks, CFO

AMC Financial Holdings, Inc.

4547 Lake Shore Drive

Waco, Texas 76710

  

 
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVMDsAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

bigpoppy72@yahoo.com

Sent:Tuesday, March 12, 2013 1:54 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Mr. stephen schultz<bigpoppy72@yahoo.com>

Address:

106 misty lane

aransas pass, TX 78336

Phone:

(512) 234-5790

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: hi, i found some excitement in your articla, about extending rail

service to the coast. i hope its to / thru Aransas pass (near corpus

christi). we often go to san antonie and fort worth. this would save our

driving. as retired seniors, we have taked bus trips also. used to enjoy

the trips to dallas areas, from fort worth.

we hope this does become reality. i know we have rails down here, but

commercial stuff. thanks, Stephen
1

From: Bert Bryan [mailto:bert@ricksheldonrealestate.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 2:47 PM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Support Letter for Rail Passenger Service

  

Sent on behalf of Rick Sheldon:

April 17, 2013

Support Letter for Rail Passenger Service

Dear Director Glavin,

Please accept this letter as an absolute YES for rail in the future! 

TxDOT’s rail passenger and freight service is absolutely vital to the future of Texas and, 

especially, Waco and the Central Texas area because of our lack of air service, along with 

congested roads, environmental concerns and safety concerns. 

Good luck and let us know if there is anything we can do to help.

Respectfully, 

Rick Sheldon

Ms. Bert Bryan

Rick Sheldon Real Estate, LLC

601 Sonterra Blvd.

San Antonio, TX 78205

210.490.2500

210.490.4465 F

bert@ricksheldonrealestate.com

DropBox Link:  https://dropbox.yousendit.com/BertBryan

  

 

Talk. Text. Crash. 
2
4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVeb9AAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

kamelshrek@yahoo.com

Sent:Monday, April 01, 2013 4:30 PM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Mr. Kamel Shrek<kamelshrek@yahoo.com>

Address:

P.O. Box 450173

Laredo, TX 78045

Phone:

(956) 723-6359

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: Hi, I am writning to support Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail. I

think it is a very good idea for turism and to provide alternative

economical transportation needed by many people. It will help in reducing

accidents on the highways and save lives . Also, it will help the

environment by using less cars on the highways .Finally , it will help

creating more jobs and business for many areas .



4/25/13 TxDOT Internet E-Mail

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVeb5AAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/1

TxDOT Internet E-Mail

ksimmons@austincollege.edu

Sent:Sunday, March 31, 2013 10:45 AM

To: TXOKRAIL

Name: Mr. Kevin Simmons<ksimmons@austincollege.edu>

Address:

1620 Andy Drive

Sherman, TX 75092

Phone:

(903) 818-2779

Requested Contact Method: E-Mail

Reason for Contact: Customer Service

Complaint: No

Comment: I want to support the expansion of rail service in Texas. While

on sabbatical as a Fulbright scholar in Europe, I had the chance to

experience the convenience of high speed passenger rail. It's

unbelievable that we cannot have a similar system. My wife and I plan to

be at the Sherman meeting on April 2.
1

From: Alfred Solano [mailto:alfred.solano@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:00 PM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Rail Service Supporter

 

Mr. Glavin, 

We support passenger rail service; passenger and freight rail service is critically important to maintaining the 

state’s enviable national and global competitive position. 

Waco’s connectivity to these rail systems is critically important to the community’s and region’s continued 

economic growth and vibrancy, particularly given our limited air service, congested roads, environmental 

concerns, and safety concerns. 

Thank you for the work that you do to further the continued economic growth and success of our State. 

Alfred Solano 

Texas Document Solutions, Inc. 

6700 Woodway Drive 

Waco, Texas 76712 

(254) 881-7500 Office 

(254) 495-2150 Cell 

 Visit our Website: Texas Document Solutions,Inc. 
1

From: Tom Stanton 

Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:41:37 PM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Casey Sadler 

Subject: Passenger rail service

Dear Bill,

  

As Executive Director of the Bernard and Audre Rapoport Foundation in Waco, Texas, I wanted to express support for

passenger rail service, as it is critically important to maintaining the state’s national and global competitive position.

  

Waco’s connectivity to any and all rail state rail systems is vital to our community and the region’s continued economic

growth and development, particularly given the competitiveness of limited air service, interstate congestion, not to

mention environmental and safety concerns.

  

We ask and urge that Waco is assured connection to any future rail system. Thank you for your insight in development

of this much needed method of state transportation.

  

Sincerely,

  

Tom Stanton

Executive Director

Rapoport Foundation

  

  

 
1

From: Willard J. Still [mailto:wstill@ambankwaco.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 2:37 PM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Rail study 

  

Good afternoon Director Glavin. 

What a wonderful opportunity for Texas to have the $5.6 million Federal grant to help fund a rail 

study. With a good route and stops near populated areas, a well-designed rail system would 

complement our excellent highway system by relieving congestion and adding a great deal of safety 

as Texans travel.

You would expect me to support Waco being a stop for the rail system and I do so. Waco is a 

growing Texas community and is home to Baylor University, TSTC, and McLennan Community 

College along with many productive and successful industries. It is the major community between 

Dallas and Austin and because of that we have limited access to ample air service. Passenger rail 

could make a real difference for this community by reducing travel on I-35 to reach a more major 

airport.

Thanks for your work to begin this important study. Whatever we in Waco may do to assist you would 

be our privilege. We are bullish on an effective rail system for Texas and we would be grateful for 

your support of a stop in Waco.








1

From: Kim Woodfin [mailto:kim.woodfin@brazos.us.com] On Behalf Of Murray Watson 

Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:47 PM 

To: Bill Glavin 

Cc: Mark Werner 

Subject: Passenger Rail Service

  

Dear Director Glavin, 

It has been brought to my attention that the State of Texas received a grant of Federal Funds for 

study of the need of a passenger rail service from Oklahoma City to Laredo, which would hopefully 

include space for freight. It’s critical to those of us here in the Central Texas area that Waco is 

included as one of the stops for the passenger service and to send off freight. This area will grow and 

take advantage of the opportunity and economic developments that lie ahead. In addition to the main 

rail, I think it is equally important that you make connects at both ends for those who have a need to 

go beyond Oklahoma City or Laredo. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Murray Watson, Jr. 

*****************************************************************************************

******************************* 

This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt 

from disclosure under applicable law. 

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 

copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance 

thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please 

immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in 

electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. 

*****************************************************************************************

******************************* 

 
4/25/13 Rail transportation

https://bluprd0612.outlook.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADPxYzbqTAKQq5sGibHgCSzBwDuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVJlwAADuHqdN6VukR6jgbsxu2BdQAAAAVmleAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_... 1/1

Rail transportation

teacher.artist@yahoo.com

Sent:Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:27 AM

To: TXOKRAIL

Dear TxDOT,

I filled out your survey today on extending rail transportation in Texas but had difficulty submitting it

through Survey Monkey. Usually you get some sort of "thank you for your submission,"

but the form hung up. Therefore, I am sending my comments via your email.

I support TXDOT plans for expanding rail transportation in TX (and beyond!). There are many reasons why this

will be beneficial to all Texans as well as visitors:

1) Train transportation will keep more cars off the road thus benefitting the environment.

2) A train's overall energy consumption is nearly half that of planes or cars per passenger.

3) Train travel is more enjoyable and less stressful than driving.

4) Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion is reduced. This benefits people and our

environment.

5) Train travel encourages tourism because people could travel faster and more widely.

When visiting Ireland, we were conveniently able to visit many cities from Dublin to Cork by train. Stations

were usually within walking distance to the city center. We occupied four seats facing each other with a table

between them. Brilliant! This facilitated the use of laptops (which were in abundant use), eating, and gameplaying for the children. The train was spotless and we were offered a variety of refreshments for purchase from

a wheeled cart. The ticket cost was surprisingly inexpensive. We saved car rental, gas, time, frustration, and

the scary experience of trying to drive on the wrong side of the road! I know We would visit Austin, Houston,

Galveston and Corpus (and points north--like even up to Wichita, Ks)-- a lot more if we didn't have to drive.

Again, I will support any effort to improve train travel in Texas.

Sincerely,

Patricia Wheeler

Sent from my iPhone

Sent from my iPhone
SCOPING REPORT 

Appendix H 

Summary and Tally of Public 

Scoping Comments 

in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Summary and Tally of Public Scoping Comments 

Comment Geogra

Section

POTENTIAL ALIGNMENTS AND STATIONS Support and Opposition (166 comments) General support for rail. Northe

Centra

Southe

General support for high-speed rail. Northe

Centra

Southe

All previous Texas high-speed rail proposals have been rejected. Texas is not ready. Improve existing rail systems. 

Centra

Southe

The people of Texas love their cars and will not change their habitats easily. Speed is not always the most important factor. 

Centr

Additional service is not needed. Bus and air travel already serve the travel demand. Northe

Southe

Texans do not want foreign companies buying and/or operating a high-speed rail system. CentrRail is not as flexible and convenient as automobile travel. CentrOpposed to using eminent domain to condemn properties. CentrCost, Affordability, and Funding (50 comments) Rail projects are a waste of funds and will lead to increased debt. Southe

Centr

Rail travel is fast, efficient, and reasonably priced. Northe

Centra

Southe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

Rail projects should not be government-subsidized. Rail projects should be funded by private companies. 

Northe

Centra

Southe

Rail is less expensive than air travel. Northe

Centr

Trains use fewer resources and are a less expensive way to travel than driving. Passenger expenses are as important as the environment. 

Southe

Need affordable rail with schedules between major urban areas (i.e., not just Oklahoma City to Fort Worth). 

Northe

Rail should be affordable to passengers. Northe

Centr

Trains would cost the taxpayers less than other infrastructure improvements. Northe

Southe

Money should be spent on road improvements, rather than rail. Northe

Centr

Texas transportation dollars should help construct rail. NortheHigh-speed rail is an economical and environmentally friendly alternative to air and highway travel. High-speed rail is cost-effective because of high cost of building/maintaining highways. 

Centr

Rail travel would have to be less expensive than flying to be feasible. SouthePartner with casinos to reduce costs to travelers. NortheConcern regarding funding of this project based on current Texas/Oklahoma budget issues. SouthePassenger rail would result in jobs. SouthePassenger rail would allow access to transportation for those who can’t afford vehicles. SoutheRail is less expensive than automobile travel. CentrLast Mile would make rail travel costly and difficult to complete. Centr
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

Trains running at 220 mph will not be cost-effective in Texas. OtheFund border security and education rather than rail improvements. SoutheMexican riders should provide a source of revenue. SoutheExpedite studies to save money and avoid outdated conclusions. NortheToo expensive until rail system becomes nationwide. CentrServices and Amenities on Trains (60 comments) Rail travel is more comfortable and relaxing than other forms of travel. Northe

Centra

Southe

Allow riders to bring bicycles on trains. Northe

Southe

Allow riders to bring luggage on trains. Northe

Southe

Include amenities to make riding rail more comfortable (e.g., food, wi-fi). NortheAllow dogs on trains. NortheAllow riders to bring cars on trains. SoutheMake travel with firearms available. SoutheInclude medical services on trains. SoutheServices and Amenities at Stations (39 comments) Rail stations need to be more convenient than airports. Northe

Centra

Southe

Include travel connections at stations, including parking, shuttle buses, rental car agency 

kiosks, and light rail links. 

Northe

Centra

Southe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

Need reliable and timely service. SoutheProvide access for wheelchairs, including special features in parking lots of stations. Northe

Southe

Do not include Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) checkpoints at stations. SoutheAdd bicycle-share programs at stations. CentrStation Locations (168 comments) Connect to Houston. Centra

Southe

Othe

Include a station at Waco. CentrInclude rail service to Laredo. Centra

Southe

Include a station at Corpus Christi. SoutheConnect to Corpus Christi/South Padre Island. Northe

Southe

Station at Brownsville/South Padre Island. Centra

Southe

Connect to Rio Grande Valley. Centra

Southe

Connect to Mexico (Nuevo Laredo, Monterrey, and Mexico City). Northe

Centra

Southe

Connect to Houston and/or Galveston. Northe

Centra

Southe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

Include a station at Austin. CentrInclude a station at El Paso. Northe

Centra

Southe

Include a station at Ardmore. NortheConnect to San Marcos. CentrInclude a station at McAllen. SoutheInclude a station at Temple. CentrInclude a station at Harlingen. SoutheConnect OKC to Fort Worth. SoutheConnect McAllen and Harlingen. SoutheInclude a station at College Station. CentrAlternatives/Routes (136 comments) Connect Wichita, Kansas City, and points north. Northe

Southern, 

Connect south Texas, as there is currently no rail service in the area. Northe

Centra

Southe

Provide high-speed service from Austin to San Antonio and Dallas. Northe

Centra

Southe

Provide high speed service from south Texas to San Antonio, Dallas, and Oklahoma City. Northe

Centr

Connect to Kansas. OtheProvide frequent service between DFW and San Antonio. Southe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

Connect to other existing systems and networks, existing rail services, and/or encourage the expansion of existing mass transit systems. 

Northe

Southe

Start by improving existing passenger rail service incrementally. Northe

Centra

Southe

Improve overall east-west service throughout Texas. Northe

Centra

Southe

Provide service from Corpus Christi to San Antonio. Northe

Southe

Build true high-speed rail rather than incremental improvements to existing rail service. Northe

Southe

Consider Shreveport to DFW link in the Study. NortheConnect DFW to Denver and points west (i.e., Los Angeles). CentrStudy feasibility of high-speed rail and conventional rail service on dedicated rail line. CentrIncorporate Trinity Railway Expressway (TRE). OtheSpecial attention should be paid to upgrading rail infrastructure in San Antonio, Houston, and 

Fort Worth. 

Northe

Trains must be as fast as possible. NortheConnect Denton to Fort Worth, then south to Waxahachie and Hillsboro. NortheConnect Fort Worth, Wichita Falls, Lawton, and Oklahoma City. NortheConnect Sherman and Dallas. NortheProvide service from Guthrie, Okla., to DFW, Waco, and San Antonio. NortheConnect Houston and Austin. CentrDirect north-south route through Dallas and DFW. Northe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

Connect Southwest Chief and Texas Eagle rail service. NortheConnect College Station and Bush International Airport. SoutheAnalyze long-distance daily routes connecting DFW to Washington, D.C., via Jackson, 

Mississippi, Birmingham, Alabama, and Atlanta. 

Centr

Higher speeds and express serviced along Texas Eagle routes. CentrDevelop a statewide network. CentrENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS Agriculture (13 comments) Blackland Prairie soils and eco-region is the most productive farmland in the state – need to 

protect this land and avoid impacts on the land and associated farming operations and activities. 

Centr

high-speed rail is devastating and destructive to agriculture with the loss of prime farmland and productive/viable farmland; impossible to move large equipment and animals to the other side of the rail alignment; highway frontage adds value to farmland; rural agriculture would resist high-speed rail but not oppose freight rail expansion; impossible to keep feral hogs off the right-of-way; need to preserve existing farmland/agricultural lands. 

Centr

Rail would potentially divide farmland and permanently affect and take farmland. CentrRail could promote agriculture by providing riders with views of farmlands and bringing people to dine at restaurants that use local produce and meats. 

Northe

Agriculture impacts if new track is needed. SoutheUsing existing right-of-way and corridors would minimize or avoid impacts on agriculture. CentrAir Quality (158 comments) Rail system would reduce traffic. Northe

Centra

Southe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

High-speed rail will benefit air quality and reduce energy consumption, emissions, automobile traffic, and air travel. 

Northe

Centra

Southe

Othe

Texas air quality will be improved if vehicle congestion and driving are reduced. Northe

Centra

Southe

High-speed rail powered by wind and solar and/or other alternative energy source and natural gas could make a big air quality impact, especially in the cities. 

Centra

Southe

Energy (60 comments) Train’s overall energy consumption is less than planes or cars per passenger – trains are more 

efficient. 

Northe

Centr

Southe

Reduce gas consumption. Northe

Centra

Southe

Consider alternative power sources and cutting edge technology for passenger rail service. Northe

Centra

Southe

Growth (25 comments) Rail will help grow the region with connections to Mexico, Oklahoma, and Kansas, as well as support the anticipated growth and demand. 

Southe

Othe

Rail will help grow/expand cities, such as Laredo or Waco, and regions, such as south Texas/the Valley or Kansas and Oklahoma, as well as support the anticipated growth and demand. 

Centra

Southe

Othe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

Improved livability of communities. Northe

Southe

Health (36 comments) Rail travel is a healthy transportation option. Northe

Centra

Southe

Air pollution levels are critical and need to be reduced – high-speed rail will help. Northe

Centr

Expansion and improvement in transportation with the decrease in congestion while minimizing the impact on health (air quality impact on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases) is critical. 

Centra

Southe

Local and Regional Economy (101 comments) Rail will provide jobs, stimulate job growth, and get the economy stronger/revitalize and support in-state economy. 

Northe

Centra

Southe

Promoting tourism and encourage using rail service will benefit regional and local economies by bringing in money (add visitors and job opportunities) and encourage cities to build mass transit systems. 

Northe

Southe

Trains are an economical way to travel, especially for those who cannot afford to fly or do not have access to airports or cars (elderly, disabled, fixed income, veterans). 

Northe

Centra

Southe

Rail service will help provide affordable travel options to colleges/universities and sporting events throughout the state (both professional and college sports). 

Northe

Centr

Rail provides opportunities for individuals to be productive while riding on the train for work. Northe

Centra

Southe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

Trains will help bring people to smaller and rural towns and see areas outside of larger cities. Northe

Centra

Southe

Make train service affordable to elderly, disabled, veterans, and poor/fixed income. NortheDevelopment of stations will help stimulate the surrounding area. Northe

Southe

Enhance trade, transportation, and commerce through the IH-35 corridor. OtheNatural Environment (108 comments) Rail is better for the overall environment. Northe

Centra

Southe

Trains are the greenest way to move large number of people – far less intrusive than the 

interstates. 

Northe

Centra

Southe

Rail alignment should minimize the amount of impact on open space, vegetation, habitat, and waterways. 

Northe

Centra

Southe

Rail will disturb and/or displace natural landscape and wildlife and the water system (erosion/runoff). 

Centra

Southe

Rail will benefit wildlife and nature. Centra

Southe

Provide ability for wildlife corridor movements, potential opportunities with tunnels underneath 

the rail lines. 

Centra

Southe

Avoid impacts to parks and preserves/open space and refuges, including Texas Conservation Action Plan eco-regions. 

Northe

Loss of trees and habitat with highways and emissions with trucks and cars. Northe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

Noise (18 comments) Rail could reduce noise levels. Northe

Centr

Southe

Noise and pollution contribute to land devaluation; rail lines are noisy. Centra

Southe

Train horns are noisy. Northe

Centr

Need to minimize noise at night and also have “quiet zones.” Centra

Southe

Trains are not anticipated to contribute to the existing city noise, minimal noise. Northe

Southe

Noise comes from trains, cars, and trucks. NortheNoise could disrupt farming – impact cattle, horses, deer, birds, etc. CentrRight-of-Way (20 comments) Use existing right-of-way and rail easements, including but not limited to UPRR corridor and IH35 corridor, as well as existing utility corridors (i.e., pipelines, power lines, transmission lines). Northe

Centr

Southe

Two freight rails side by side in present right-of-way and being one way will solve freight 

problems and get trade off the highways. 

Centr

Plenty of right-of-way for rail. NortheUtilize existing stations. NortheRun rails parallel to existing right-of-way/corridors. SoutheRequired rail right-of-way would be no different than needing additional right-of-way for more 

highway lanes or toll roads. 

Southe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

New right-of-way should be the last option. CentrRail corridor should be west of IH-35 (to avoid Blackland to the east of IH-35). CentrTECHNICAL/ENGINEERING CONCERNS Ridership (26 comments) Increased speed and frequency of service will increase ridership. Northe

Centra

Southe

Need a thorough demand/ridership analysis. Northe

Centr

Important to correctly project ridership. CentrPlanning (2 comments) Elevated trains in highways medians. CentrReview the Association of Central Oklahoma Governments commuter rail study that includes 

the Oklahoma City to Norman BNSF corridor when analyzing impacts. 

Northe

Freight (6 comments) Improvements to freight rail is needed to remove truck off overcrowded highways. CentrIncreased freight rail into the Rio Grande Valley. SoutheDouble track to avoid freight delays. OtheNeed to reasonably compensate freight line used by passenger rails. NortheShould spend money on rapid freight instead of passenger rail. CentrSafety (63 comments) Rail is efficient and will make the roads safer and cleaner with fewer cars on the roads and less accidents. IH-35 and IH-10 are dangerous and risky with all the traffic; the project will alleviate much of the heavy traffic and congestion. 

Northe

Centra

Southe
in coordination with Oklahoma DOT

Comment Geogra

Section

Rail provides a safer alternative to vehicle travel, especially for traveling alone, the elderly, and at night. 

Centra

Southe

Need to evaluate the safety of crossings and create safe crossings, especially in key locations (such as IH-35). 

Northe

Southe

Additional wait times required at grade crossings and concerned about train speeds at crossings. 

Northe

Southe

Need to designate tracks with no or very few crossings associated with high-speed rail. Northe

Centr

Crossings can be dangerous and should be secured by adequate warnings or eliminated. Centra

Northe

Crossings are not dangerous; people need to stop at crossings. NortheTxDOT should look at more grade-separated crossings. CentrEliminate as many road-rail crossings as possible and improve signaling. CentrConcern over illegal immigration and drug trafficking. SoutheRail could expedite the safe evacuation of elderly persons and person with disabilities from south Texas in the event of an approaching hurricane. 

Southe

Rail could expedite evacuations during natural disasters. SoutheTechnology (6 comments)Use elevated solar powered magnetic monorail. CentrSystem should be solar powered. Southe
TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY 

This report was written on behalf of the Texas Department of Transportation by