alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Virolab, Inc. (the Company ) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report) and pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), James A.D. Smith, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Matthew M. Loar, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Company’s Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual Report and the results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Annual Report.








June 29, 2011








/ S / James A.D. SmithJames A.D. Smith

Chief Executive Officer











/ S / Matthew M. LoarMatthew M. Loar

Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF TODHUNTER INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

 
| **Subsidiary**                                                               |   | **Jurisdiction  of  Incorporation** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |   |                                |
| American  Negociants, Inc.                                                   |   | Texas                               |
| Todhunter  Imports, Ltd. (formerly Blair Importers, Ltd.)                    |   | New York                            |
| Bodegas  Morera                                                              |   | Florida                             |
| Todhunter  Bahamas Limited (formerly Todhunter-Mitchell and Company Limited) |   | Bahamas                             |
| Virgin  Islands Rum Industries, Ltd.                                         |   | U.S. Virgin  Islands                |
| Todhunter  (Barbados) SRL                                                    |   | Barbados                            |
| Todhunter  Finance Company                                                   |   | Delaware                            |

 

----
Exhibit 35.1




Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.




I, Pierre Boutros, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York corporation (the “Trustee”), state:




(a) A review of the Trustee’s activities for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Trustee’s performance under the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated July 15, 2010 between MS Structured Asset Corp. as depositor (the “Depositor”) and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary, in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor and the Trustee (as amended in each such case, the “Trust Agreement”), has been made under my supervision.




(b)  To the best of my knowledge and based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for Step Up Callable Trust Units Series 2010-03 (Alcoa).


The Bank of New York Mellon, as TrusteeDate: March 2, 2012

/s/Pierre BoutrosPierre BoutrosVice President
# C_2007211EN.01002901.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/29

---

Action brought on 13 July 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-329/07)

(2007/C 211/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: W. Wils, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (1), or in any event by not communicating them to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (1), or in any event by not communicating them to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of Directive 2004/48/EC into domestic law expired on 29 April 2006.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45, and corrigendum OJ 2004 L 195, p. 16.

1

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10248 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSIMAR BADILLO

- ORTIZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 236

- 3

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Josimar Badillo

- Ortiz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Badillo

- Ortiz has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Badillo

- Ortiz ’s claims of ine ffective assistance of counsel; we therefor e decline to consider the claims without

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10248 Document: 00513805086 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016No. 16

- 10248

2 prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Badillo

- Ortiz’s response. In his response, Badillo

Ortiz disputes the drug quantity for which he was held accountable. Badillo

Ortiz’s trial counsel di d not object to the drug quantity at sentencing. Because drug quantity is a factual finding, and Badillo

- Ortiz failed to properly object in the district court, Badillo

- Ortiz’s drug quantity challenge cannot succeed on plain error review. See United State s v. Conn , 657 F.3d 280, 284

- 86 (5th Cir. 2011). We therefore agree with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further r esponsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Case: 16-10248 Document: 00513805086 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Patricia G. Skarpa, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of Innocap, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Exclusive Building Services, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I, as the certifying officer have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   Date: October 10, 2011  /s/ Patricia G. Skarpa Patricia G. Skarpa Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009019EN.01000101.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/1

---

(2009/C 19/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 6, 10.1.2009

OJ C 6, 10.1.2009

Past publications

OJ C 327, 20.12.2008

OJ C 313, 6.12.2008

OJ C 301, 22.11.2008

OJ C 285, 8.11.2008

OJ C 272, 25.10.2008

OJ C 260, 11.10.2008

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2008284EN.01000201.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 November 2008

(2008/C 284/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2756 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4455 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80845 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0545 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4983 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 200,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7210 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,092 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,6615 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,7330 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,394 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9799 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9096 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5224 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8861 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1712 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9088 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 691,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,8549 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7066 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1421 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 159,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5309 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,060 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5055 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,589 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7851 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5573 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2756

JPY

Japanese yen

124,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4455

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80845

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0545

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4983

ISK

Iceland króna

200,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7210

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,092

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

3,6615

RON

Romanian leu

3,7330

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,394

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9799

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9096

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5224

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8861

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1712

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9088

KRW

South Korean won

1 691,51

ZAR

South African rand

12,8549

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7066

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1421

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 159,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5309

PHP

Philippine peso

62,060

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5055

THB

Thai baht

44,589

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7851

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5573

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Case: 2:11-cv-00284-EAS-TPK Doc #: 4 Filed: 08/23/11 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00284-EAS-TPK Doc #: 4 Filed: 08/23/11 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T21:19:37-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under

EO12866 Interagency Review.  Subject to Further Policy Review.

1

EPA NPRM: Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule Step 3,

GHG Plantwide Applicability Limitations and GHG Synthetic Minor Limitations

p. 49 Include comment bubble JES90 in footnote.

p.50 Comment JES101 seems to contradict the phrase “unless EPA stipulates otherwise”. Please explain

in the text or footnote the degree of discretion implied by EPA’s ability to stipulate otherwise. Can EPA

stipulate whatever it wants, or does it face some constraints?

p.51 comment JES108 contradicts the statement at the top of page 49 that states “can  only issue a PAL

to a GHG‐only source when the source proposes to undertake such a change”. In your comment you

state that it is only after the change occurs. Which is it? Either correct p 49 or or change p.51 from “(1)

issue PALs to GHG‐only sources  ;” to “(1) issue PALs to GHG‐only sources that are not proposing to

increase emissions by 75,000 tpy CO2e ;”

p.59 typo “inder” to “under”

p.59 please clarify in text what the “enhanced recordkeeping reporting and monitoring” of a PAL are.

This makes it sound like there is more monitoring, etc, whereas the earlier discussion seems to imply

that the rule would reduce monitoring. Do you mean “reduced” instead of “enhanced”?

p.64 comment JES136 suggests that calling a source a “synthetic minor” does not make it a “minor”,

since its emissions will still be larger than the “minor” threshold. So it will be treated as a minor source

for a conventional pollutant would be, while still being above the minor threshold? Please clarify in text.
Case No. 9,90S.

#### MUIR v. GEIGER.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 323.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1806.

Payment — Receipt of Bond of Thibd Person'.

A receipt of a bond of a third person “in part pay” of a precedent debt is conclusive evidence of payment to that extent, although the obligor was insolvent at the time of the receipt given.

Indebitatus assumpsit, for a desk and bookcase sold and delivered. The defendant produced a receipt from the plaintiff, for a bond of one Allison, for £16. 14s. *lOYiá.,*“in part pay on a desk and bookcase.”

The COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent,)

said it was conclusive evidence that the bond was received in part payment, although the bond might have been unproductive, and Allison insolvent at the time.
EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, the following certification shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, notwithstanding any
general incorporation by reference of this Report of Lone Oak Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 6-K as
filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), into any other document filed with the Commission by the
Company.



In connection with the Report, each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated: May 15, 2013

| | By: | /s/ Baris Merzeci       | 
| | --- | ----------------------- | 
| |     | Baris Merzeci          
| |     | Chief Executive Officer



Dated: May 15, 2013

| | By: | /s/ Can Aydinoglu       | 
| | --- | ----------------------- | 
| |     | Can Aydinoglu          
| |     | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-26-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                            6163
<SECURITIES>                                     25732
<RECEIVABLES>                                    35594
<ALLOWANCES>                                       184
<INVENTORY>                                      10955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 78769
<PP&E>                                           67899
<DEPRECIATION>                                   49346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  127550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            19608
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                       72997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    127550
<SALES>                                          29747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 29747
<CGS>                                            21979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    28488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1837
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1797
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18


</TABLE>
# C_2008029EN.01001101.xml

| 1.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/11

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — DG ENTR — ENT/CIP/08/C/N02S00/1

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Global Sectoral Approaches: Sectoral approaches as part of a post-2012 framework

(2008/C 29/08)

1.   Objectives and description

Sectoral approaches offer a promising way forward to address energy and climate change challenges without compromising economic growth.

The objective of the call is to gain experience with and knowledge of developing sectoral approaches from carrying out projects in key emerging countries as well as trans-national projects. This will provide proof of concept of how sectoral approaches could work; how sectoral approaches would fit into a post-2012 international framework on climate change; what actions would be necessary for sectoral approaches to become a tool in the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and necessary links to the global carbon market.

2.   Eligible applicants

Applicants must be established in one of the following countries:

| — | the 27 countries of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

the 27 countries of the European Union,

| — | the EFTA and EEA countries: Switzerland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, |
| --- | --- |

—

the EFTA and EEA countries: Switzerland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway,

| — | other third countries when agreements so allow. |
| --- | --- |

—

other third countries when agreements so allow.

3.   Budget and project duration

The maximum budget allocated for the operation is: EUR 1 900 000.

maximum budget

The maximum amount by project is: EUR 1 900 000.

maximum amount by project

Community co-financing rate of eligible costs: 90 %.

Community co-financing rate

Community co-financing ceiling: EUR 1 900 000.

Community co-financing ceiling

The maximum duration of projects is 24 months.

24 months

4.   Deadline

Applications must be sent to the Commission no later than 7 March 2008.

7 March 2008

5.   Further information

The full text of the call for proposals and the application forms are available on the following website:

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/funding/index.htm

Applications must comply with the requirements set out in the full text and be submitted using the form provided.

---