alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CA2007295EN.01000101.xml

| 7.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 295/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 295/1

---

RESERVE LIST
   (1)

RESERVE LIST

1

OPEN COMPETITIONS EPSO/AD/70/06

OPEN COMPETITIONS

ENGLISH-LANGUAGE LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS (AD7)

ENGLISH-LANGUAGE LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS (AD7)

(CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS)

(CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS)

(2007/C 295 A/01)

Option 1

| COZORT | Christl Gaye |
| --- | --- |
| FILIPEK | Lydia |
| FLETCHER | Richard James |
| HAYES | Rachel Catherine |
| HOWSE | Simone Karin |
| PASHLEY | Daniel |
| PETERSONS | Catherine |
| SPETSIOU | Ioulia |
| VERMEULEN | Madeline |

COZORT

Christl Gaye

FILIPEK

Lydia

FLETCHER

Richard James

HAYES

Rachel Catherine

HOWSE

Simone Karin

PASHLEY

Daniel

PETERSONS

Catherine

SPETSIOU

Ioulia

VERMEULEN

Madeline

Option 2

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2008 and may be extended.

31 December 2008

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00461-CV

Douglas Gengenbach, Viola Bazan, Individually and/or d/b/a Exotic Berry, LLC and/or 

Exotic Berry, LLC

v.

Ivonne Ochoa Angulo and Salvador Palacios, Individually and/or d/b/a Exotic Berry 

Frozen Yogurt

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CL-18-3329-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are taxed against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 20, 2018
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50510

__________________

JOSEPH BELL,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

O.A. "BOB" BROOKSHIRE; 

ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-93-CV-149

- - - - - - - - - -

September 21, 1995

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joseph Bell moves this court for leave to proceed on appeal

in forma pauperis (IFP). See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). "To proceed

on appeal [IFP], a litigant must be economically eligible, and

his appeal must not be frivolous." Jackson v. Dallas Police

Dep't, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986).

Bell argues that error occurred by the denial of his motions

for appointment of counsel. We review for an abuse of
No. 95-50510

-2-

discretion. Id. In the context of a civil rights suit,

appointment of counsel is not required without the presence of

"exceptional circumstances." Id. (citation and internal

quotations omitted). Because an examination of the record

confirms that no such circumstances existed in this case, we find

no abuse of discretion. See id. at 262; Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691

F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th Cir. 1982).

Bell does not challenge the findings of fact or conclusions

of law underlying the final judgment in favor of the defendants. 

Therefore, any such challenge is deemed abandoned. Eason v.

Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th Cir. 1994).

Bell has not presented a nonfrivolous issue. See Jackson,

811 F.2d at 261. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that his motion for

leave to proceed on appeal IFP is DENIED. Because his appeal is

frivolous, the appeal is

DISMISSED.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Joseph F. Spanier, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this first amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A-1 ofTransTechnology Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: June 21, 2004 /s/ Joseph F. Spanier   Joseph F. Spanier   Chief Financial Officer
Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

From: Michael Graham [mgraham1961@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 9:23 PM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: Continued EAS support for Venango Regional Airport 

Re: DOT Order 2010-5-22 (Continued EAS service to Franklin) ^3 

To : Mr. Dennis Devany, US Dept. of Transportation ' ;;j 

From: Michael Graham, Franklin, Pa. ^~J 

Dear Sir: 

I am writing to you today as a concerned citizen, to enthusiastically convey my support for continued commercial air 

service at Venango Regional Airport (FKL). As a former employee of each of the previous airlines at FKL (from 1979 

through 1994), I believe I have a unique perspective of the importance of commercial air service to our community, 

along with the vital role of the DOT concerning the Essential Air Service program. 

Prior to the arrival of Gulfstream International Airlines at FKL, previous air carriers fell miserably short in their efforts (or 

lack thereof) to provide the airport with reliable and professional service. While accepting thousands of dollars from the 

Essential Air Service program, they contributed little in return. Cancellations and delayed flights became the norm. 

Despite the very best efforts of the current and previous Airport Manager, along with a great deal of support from our 

local, state, and federal legislators- often it seemed as if the air carriers were purposely working against us. 

Over the past two years, Gulfstream International has provided the Oil Region with a very reliable and professional air 

service. Not since the days of "Crown Airways" has an airline made such a strong effort to turn ridership around, and 

bring the airport back to profitability. Now that we finally have an airline who truly "cares", it would be a terrible shame 

to see their efforts come to an end because of non inclusion in the EAS program. If you read closely the content of 

Gulfstream's proposal for service option one, it is very apparent they not only believe in the oil region, but wish to be an 

active partner in reviving it! 

I am writing to wholeheartedly support Gulfstream's Service Option 1 that includes the continued air service to Venango 

Regional Airport. 

Best Regards, Michael Graham
(Reap. Dec. 9206)

#### D. J. Ambrosio *v.*United states

Entry No. 891217.

(Decided August 13, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

*510I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
FRA 10-23

October 12, 2023

Contact: FRA Public Affairs

Tel.: (202) 493-6024 

FRAPA@DOT.gov

FRA Publishes Final Rule Requiring the Installation of Locomotive Image 

Recording Devices on Passenger Trains 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) announced a final rule 

requiring the installation of inward- and outward-facing image recording devices on all 

passenger train lead locomotives providing scheduled intercity rail passenger or commuter 

service. The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) required this regulation,

and the regulation also responds to a National Transportation Safety Board recommendation with 

the aim to enhance safety across the passenger rail industry.

The final rule mandates that locomotive video recording devices must remain operational while 

the controlling locomotive of a passenger train is in motion. To ensure the integrity and 

accessibility of this footage, the rule stipulates that data captured must retain at least the last 12 

hours of recorded footage and be stored in a crashworthy memory module. Since locomotivemounted recording devices on passenger trains are categorized as "safety devices" tampering 

with or disabling of these vital recording systems is prohibited.

“While video recorders cannot directly prevent accidents, they help maintain a higher standard of 

safety,” said FRA Administrator Amit Bose. “In addition, these devices play a vital role in 

post-accident investigations, providing valuable evidence that helps us understand the 

circumstances leading to the accident and take appropriate action to prevent similar accidents in 

the future.”

The final rule also establishes guidelines for the utilization of passenger locomotive recordings 

for operational tests, allowing the evaluation of operating employees' compliance with applicable 

railroad operating rules and Federal regulations. By leveraging the video recordings, passenger 

railroads can effectively identify areas of improvement and enhance overall safety. The 

implementation of these locomotive image and audio recording devices is a significant step 

forward in bolstering passenger rail safety and maintaining regulatory compliance. 
While FRA is not requiring the installation and use of inward- and outward-facing recording 

devices in freight locomotives, it should be noted that they have been voluntarily installed by 

freight railroads on a widespread basis. 

Further information on the final rule for Railroad Carriers to install Locomotive Image and 

Audio Recording Devices for Passenger Trains is published in the Federal Register here. 

###
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002









To my knowledge, this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tasty Baking
Company.  In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this
certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B)
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the company
specifically incorporates it by reference.






By:
              
              /s/ Charles P. PizziCharles
      P. PizziPresident
      andChief
      Executive OfficerBy:
              
              /s/ Paul D. RidderPaul
      D. RidderSenior
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer












Date:  November
2, 2009
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity Capital Corporation, a New Mexico corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Daniel R. Bartholomew as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trinity Capital Corporation and will be retained by Trinity Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| /s/ DANIEL R. BARTHOLOMEW |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Daniel R. Bartholomew     |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| August 14, 2003           |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

1
EXHIBIT 32.2









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual  Report of DNA Precious Metals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K A-2 for the period ended December 31, 2013  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




3.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









Date:  December  24, 2014
By: /s/ James ChandikJames Chandik, CFO
# C_2007155EN.01000401.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 May 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-394/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2000/53/EC - End-of-life vehicles - Articles 3(5), 5(1), 7(2) and 8(3) and (4) - Defective transposition)

(2007/C 155/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Recchia and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia and P. Gentili, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 12 of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles (OJ 2000 L 269, p. 34)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting Legislative Decree No 209 of 24 June 2003 transposing into national law the provisions of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles in a manner contrary to that directive, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(5), Article 5(1), the second subparagraph of Article 7(2)(a) and Article 8(3) and (4) of that Directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting Legislative Decree No 209 of 24 June 2003 transposing into national law the provisions of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles in a manner contrary to that directive, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(5), Article 5(1), the second subparagraph of Article 7(2)(a) and Article 8(3) and (4) of that Directive;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 28.1.2006.

1

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 13 

Authorizing expenditures by the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2005 

Mr. DOMENICI, from the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, reported the following original resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing expenditures by the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources. 

1 Resolved, That, in carrying out its powers, duties, and 

2 functions under the Standing Rules of the Senate, in ac3 cordance with its jurisdiction under rule XXV of such 

4 rules, including holding hearings, reporting such hearings, 

5 and making investigations as authorized by paragraphs 1 

6 and 8 of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, 

7 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources is au8 thorized from March 1, 2005, through September 30, 

9 2005; October 1, 2005, through September 30, 2006; and 

10 October 1, 2006, through February 28, 2007, in its discre-
2 

SRES 13 RS

1 tion (1) to make expenditures from the contingent fund 

2 of the Senate, (2) to employ personnel, and (3) with the 

3 prior consent of the Government department or agency 

4 concerned and the Committee on Rules and Administra5 tion, to use on a reimbursable or non-reimbursable basis 

6 the services of personnel of any such department or agen7 cy. 

8 SEC. 2. (a) The expenses of the committee for the 

9 period March 1, 2005, through September 30, 2005, 

10 under this resolution shall not exceed $2,923,302. 

11 (b) For the period October 1, 2005, through Sep12 tember 30, 2006, expenses of the committee under this 

13 resolution shall not exceed $5,133,032. 

14 (c) For the period October 1, 2006, through Feb15 ruary 28, 2007, expenses of the committee under this res16 olution shall not exceed $2,185,132. 

17 SEC. 3. The committee shall report its findings, to18 gether with such recommendations for legislation as it 

19 deems advisable, to the Senate at the earliest practicable 

20 date, but not later than February 28, 2005, respectively. 

21 SEC. 4. Expenses of the committee under this resolu22 tion shall be paid from the contingent fund of the Senate 

23 upon vouchers approved by the chairman of the com24 mittee, except that vouchers shall not be required (1) for 

25 the disbursement of salaries of employees paid at an an-
3 

SRES 13 RS

1 nual rate, or (2) for the payment of telecommunications 

2 provided by the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Door3 keeper, United States Senate, or (3) for the payment of 

4 stationery supplies purchased through the Keeper of the 

5 Stationery, United States Senate, or (4) for payments to 

6 the Postmaster, United States Senate, or (5) for the pay7 ment of metered charges on copying equipment provided 

8 by the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper, 

9 United States Senate, or (6) for the payment of Senate 

10 Recording and Photographic Services, or (7) for payment 

11 of franked and mass mail costs by the Sergeant at Arms 

12 and Doorkeeper, United States Senate. 

Æ
---

Exhibit 99.11

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the Form
40-F) of Timmins Gold Corp., I, Richard M. Gowans, President of Micon
International Limited. (Micon), hereby consent to the use of my name and
Micons name in connection with the references to the mineral reserve and
resource estimates for the San Francisco Project (the Estimates) and to the
incorporation by reference of references to, and summaries of, the Estimates in
the Form 40-F.

MICON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED.

By:        /s/ Richard M
GowansName:   Richard M Gowans Title:     President

March 29, 2012

---
No. 48649.

#### Protest 87225-K of Ozalid Corporation (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the sensitizing preparations and developer for photoprint paper passed upon in *Ozalid Corporation*v. *United States*(T. D. 48969), and further that the merchandise is a mixture as provided for in subsection (a) (4) of paragraph 27, consisting in whole or in part of products enumerated under said paragraph 27, it was held dutiable at 40 percent ad valorem and 7 cents per pound under paragraph 27 as claimed.