alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report) of Solar Senior
Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael S. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/S/    MICHAEL S. GROSSName:

Michael S. GrossDate:

February 24, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 61 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 61

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 28, 2005

            Referred to the Committe on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the remains of Rosa Parks to lie in honor in the rotunda of 
                              the Capitol.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in recognition of the historic contributions of Rosa Parks, her 
remains be permitted to lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol from 
October 30 to October 31, 2005, so that the citizens of the United 
States may pay their last respects to this great American. The 
Architect of the Capitol, under the direction and supervision of the 
President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, shall take all necessary steps for the accomplishment 
of that purpose.

            Passed the Senate October 27, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
# C_2014439EN.01000201.xml

| 8.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Alexandra Schulz v Technische Werke Schussental GmbH und Co. KG and Josef Egbringhoff v Stadtwerke Ahaus GmbH

(Joined Cases C-359/11 and C-400/11) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directives 2003/54/EC and 2003/55/EC - Consumer protection - Internal market in electricity and natural gas - National legislation determining the content of consumer contracts covered by a universal supply obligation - Unilateral adjustment of the price of the service by the seller or supplier - Information, with adequate notice before the adjustment comes into effect, as to the reasons and preconditions for that adjustment and its scope))

(2014/C 439/02)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Alexandra Schulz and Josef Egbringhoff

Applicants:

Defendants: Technische Werke Schussental GmbH und Co. KG and Stadtwerke Ahaus GmbH

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

On the one hand, Article 3(5) of Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC, read in conjunction with Annex A thereto, and, on the other, Article 3(3) of Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC, read in conjunction with Annex A thereto, are to be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which determines the content of consumer contracts for the supply of electricity and gas covered by a universal supply obligation and allows the price of that supply to be adjusted, but which does not ensure that customers are to be given adequate notice, before that adjustment comes into effect, of the reasons and preconditions for the adjustment, and its scope.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.

1

---
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 2 June 2005

in Case T-177/03 Andreas Strohm v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Officials - Refusal of promotion to Grade A4 - Consideration of comparative merits - Duty to state grounds - Additional statement of grounds - Action for annulment and compensation - Admissibility)

(2005/C 193/39)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-177/03: Andreas Strohm, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by C. Illig, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Berardis-Kayser, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the Commission's decision dated 14 August 2002, not to promote the applicant to Grade A4 in the 2002 procedure, and for compensation — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; C. Kristensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 2 June 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 200 of 20.8.2003.

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1586
THUYA MAUNG, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A98-478-440) Submitted: April 11, 2008 Decided: April 25, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sandy Khine, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Thuya Maung, a native and citizen of Burma, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for relief from removal. Maung first challenges the determination that he failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Maung fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Maung cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of Todhunter International,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in thisReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe Company and its results of operations as of and for the periods coveredtherein.

 

 
|   | /s/   Jay S. Maltby                        |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Jay S. Maltby                                   |
|   | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

 

Date:  August 13, 2004

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Tokheim
Corporation's August 31, 1996, quarterly financial statements and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000098559
<NAME> TOKHEIM CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          103375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    39083
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (935)
<INVENTORY>                                      38056<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                181990
<PP&E>                                           84227<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                   57852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  217728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            36586
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             7639<F3>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         18904<F4>
<OTHER-SE>                                        (370)<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    217728
<SALES>                                         166212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                166212
<CGS>                                           116488<F6>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   116488<F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (484)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (240)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)
<FN>
<F1>Represents gross inventory net of LIFO and loss reserves.
<F2>Represents gross PP&E.
<F3>Represents redeemable preferred stock of $24,000 less Guaranteed ESOP of
$12,232 and treasury stock of $4,129.
<F4>Represents common stock of $19,409 less Guaranteed ESOP of $303 and treasury
stock of $203.
<F5>Represents retained earnings of $8,298 less minimum pension liability of
$3,868 and foreign currency translation adjustments of $4,800.
<F6>Includes product development expenses and excludes depreciation.
Chicago‐Milwaukee

Amtrak Hiawatha Service

Draft Environmental Assessment

Appendix D

Correspondence from Miami Tribe of Oklahoma
     

	 	 	

	 	

Melanie K. Johnson 

From: andrea.martin@dot.gov 

Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 9:03 AM 

To: Melanie K. Johnson 

Subject: FW: Chicago to Milwaukee Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan 

For our records:

From: Diane Hunter [mailto:dhunter@miamination.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 9:00 AM 

To: Martin, Andrea (FRA) 

Subject: Chicago to Milwaukee Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan
 

Dear	Ms.	Martin:

Aya,	kikwehsitoole.		My	name	is	Diane	Hunter,	and	I	am	the	Acting	Tribal	Historic	Preservation Officer	for the

Federally	Recognized	Miami	Tribe	of Oklahoma.		In	this	capacity,	I	am	the Miami	Tribe’s	point	of	contact	for	all	

Section	106	issues.

The	Miami	Tribe	offers	no	objection	to	the	above‐mentioned	project	at	this	time,	as	we	are	not	currently	aware	of	

existing	documentation	directly	linking	a	specific	Miami	cultural	or	historic site	to the	project	site.		However,	as	

this	site	is	within	the	aboriginal	homelands	of	the	Miami Tribe, if	any	human	remains	or	Native	American	cultural

items	falling	under	the	Native	American	Graves	Protection	and	Repatriation Act	(NAGPRA)	or	archaeological	

evidence is	discovered	during	any	phase	of	this	project,	the	Miami	Tribe	requests	immediate	consultation	with	the	

entity	of	jurisdiction	for	the	location	of	discovery.	In	such	a	case,	please	contact	me at	918‐541‐8966,	by	email	at

dhunter@miamination.com,	or	by	mail	at	the	address	listed	below	to	initiate	consultation.

The Miami	Tribe	requests	to	serve	as	an	interested	party	to the	proposed	project	and	requests	a	copy	of	the

cultural	resources	survey.	In	my	capacity	as	Acting	Tribal	Historic	Preservation	Officer	I	am	the point	of	contact	for	

consultation.

Respectfully,

Diane	Hunter

Acting	Tribal	Historic Preservation	Officer

Miami	Tribe of Oklahoma

P.O.	Box	1326

Miami,	OK	74355

1
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 17 Q

Research and Development Permits •

FEDERAL

REOUIREMENT

FEDERAL

RCRA

CITATION

ANALOGOUS

STATE

CITATION

STATE ANALOG IS:

MORE BROADEQUIV- STRIN- ER IN

ALENT GENT SCOPE

PART 270 - EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAM: THE

HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT PROGRAM

SUBPART B - PERMIT APPLICATION

GENERAL APPLICATION REOUIREMENTS WAC 173-303

t permit application 270,10{a) -801(7) & 800 x

SUBPART F - SPECIAL FORMS OF PERMITS

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION PERMITS

•

•

t R&D permits 270,65 -809(3) x
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6480]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 70-27]


Notice of Issuance of Renewed License, BWX Technologies, Inc., 
Lynchburg, VA

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Billy Gleaves, Project Manager, Fuel 
Manufacturing Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, 
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission (NRC), Mail Stop T-8F42, Washington, DC 20555, 
telephone: (301) 415-5848; fax number (301) 415-5955; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aecccdc9eec0dccd80c9c1d8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2a0a1a582acb0a1eca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction

    Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.106, the NRC is providing notice of issuance 
of Materials License SNM-42 to BWX Technologies, Inc., (the licensee), 
to authorize continuing operation of the licensee's Mt. Athos facility 
in Lynchburg, Virginia. The licensee's request for the renewal of its 
license was previously noticed in the Federal Register on March 6, 2006 
(71 FR 11231), with a notice of opportunity to request a hearing that 
was open for 60 days. No requests for a hearing were received during 
the 60-day period. The associated Environmental Assessment and Finding 
of No Significant Impact was published in the Federal Register on March 
31, 2006.
    This renewed license complies with standards and requirements of 
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and NRC's regulations as set 
forth in 10 CFR Chapter I. Accordingly, the renewed license was issued 
on March 29, 2007 and was effective immediately.

II. Further Information

    The NRC prepared a Safety and Safeguards Evaluation Report that 
documented the information reviewed, including NRC's conclusion. The 
Safety and Safeguards Evaluation Report and other related documents 
contain sensitive, unclassified security information, and is therefore 
deemed Official Use Only and will not be placed in the Public Document 
Room or the Publicly Available Records component of the NRC's 
Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) document 
system.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of March 2007.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Gary S. Janosko,
Deputy Director, Fuel Facility Licensing Directorate, Division of Fuel 
Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E7-6480 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer UnderSection 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, David L. Bradshaw, Chief Executive Officerof Tipperary Corporation, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q/A of Tipperary Corporation, Inc. (“registrant”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Reserved;

 

(c) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design of operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely effect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:      | December 10, 2004  |
|------------|-------------------------|
|       |                    |
| Signature: | /s/ David L. Bradshaw   |   |
|       | David L. Bradshaw       |
| Title:     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         235,595
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    822,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               344,440
<PP&E>                                         134,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,291,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,148,850
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,060
<OTHER-SE>                                   (900,698)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,291,408
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,942
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               392,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (439,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (439,386)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2007297EN.01003306.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/33

---

Order of the President of the Court of 12 September 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-37/07) (1)

1

(2007/C 297/60)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.

1

---