alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 148 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 148

 To authorize the display of the Senate Leadership Portrait Collection 
                          in the Senate Lobby.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2005

Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Dodd) submitted the following resolution; 
                   which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the display of the Senate Leadership Portrait Collection 
                          in the Senate Lobby.

Whereas the objective of the Senate Leadership Portrait Collection is to 
        commemorate the distinguished service to the Senate and the Nation of 
        those Senators who have served as Majority Leader, Minority Leader, or 
        President pro tempore: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That (a) portraits in the Senate Leadership Portrait 
Collection may be displayed in the Senate Lobby at the direction of the 
Senate Commission on Art in accordance with guidelines prescribed 
pursuant to subsection (d).
    (b) The Senate Leadership Portrait Collection shall consist of 
portraits selected by the Senate Commission on Art of Majority or 
Minority Leaders and Presidents pro tempore of the Senate.
    (c) Any portrait for the Senate Leadership Portrait Collection that 
is acquired on or after the date of adoption of this resolution shall 
be of an appropriate size for display in the Senate Lobby, as 
determined by the Senate Commission on Art.
    (d) The Senate Commission on Art shall prescribe such guidelines as 
it deems necessary, subject to the approval of the Committee on Rules 
and Administration, to carry out this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008316EN.01001801.xml

| 11.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/18

---

NOTIFICATION

NOTIFICATION

(2008/C 316/07)

The Commission notifies to stakeholders, in conformity with Article 3(1), 6th subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 972/2006, the translation into other languages of the ‘Authenticity Certificate’, which has to be established in English in conformity with Article 3(1) of the same Regulation for the purposes of importing Basmati rice into the European Union.

The Commission notifies to stakeholders, in conformity with Article 3(1), 6th subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 972/2006, the translation into other languages of the ‘Authenticity Certificate’, which has to be established in English in conformity with Article 3(1) of the same Regulation for the purposes of importing Basmati rice into the European Union.

MODEL B

Image

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 28 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 28

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Approving the location of the commemorative work in the District of 
        Columbia honoring former President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code provides that the 
        location of a commemorative work in the area described as Area I shall 
        be deemed authorized only if approved by law not later than 150 days 
        after notification to Congress and others that the commemorative work 
        may be located in Area I;
Whereas section 8162 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2000 (40 
        U.S.C. 8903 note) authorizes the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial 
        Commission to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of 
        Columbia to honor Dwight D. Eisenhower; and
Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress of her determination 
        that the memorial should be located in Area I: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of 
America in Congress assembled, That the location of the commemorative work to 
honor Dwight D. Eisenhower, authorized by section 8162 of the Department of 
Defense Appropriations Act, 2000 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note), within Area I as 
depicted on the map referred to in section 8908(a) of title 40, United States 
Code, is approved.
            Passed the Senate April 4, 2006.
            Attest:

                                                                      Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 28

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Approving the location of the commemorative work in the District of 
        Columbia honoring former President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
```
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as required by

Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Marc Voigt, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Prima BioMed Ltd (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended June 30, 2016, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 13.1 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: October 3, 2016  
|                       
|/s/ Marc Voigt         
|Marc Voigt             
|Chief Executive Officer
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Prima BioMed Ltd under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 50218.

#### Protests 667211-G, etc., of F. Frisch, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of H.M.O.L. , a Child In the Interest of K.X.J.L., a Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 7 75

- CV

01

- 17

- 00776

- CV

Trial court case number: 201 4

- 0 1564J

2013

- 06554J

Trial court: 3 13 th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, G.R.R.

, has filed a motion for an extension of time to file h er brief in each appeal . The motion is granted

. Appellant’s brief in each appeal is due to be filed

wit h this Court no later than Monday
, January 8 , 201 8

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4( a), 38.6(d).

Th ese appeal s involve the termination of the parent

- child relationship

. A ccordingly , this Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of October 9 , 2017, the date the notice s of appeal w ere filed

, so far as reasonably possible. See T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2, reprinted in T EX

. G OV ’ T

. C ODE A NN

. , tit. 2,

su btit. F app. ( Vernon 201 3 ). Accordingly, no further extensions will be granted.

It is s o ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 12 , 2017
Purpose of 

Grant Program

Eligible Applicants and 

Application Process

Eligible 

Projects

To provide Amtrak with supplemental authorized amounts for FY22-FY26 for 

specific program and project types on the Northeast Corridor and National Network 

(BIL Division J, Title VIII).

• Applicant: Secretary of Transportation

• Application Process: Within 180 days of the passage of the BIL, the Secretary of 

Transportation will submit to Congress detailed spend plans for these authorized funds 

on both the Northeast Corridor and the National Network; the Secretary will submit 

these plans once per fiscal year through 2026. 

• Northeast Corridor (NEC):

o New passenger rolling stock to replace single-level passenger cars used in Amtrak’s 

NEC services, and associated rehabilitation, upgrade, and expansion of related 

maintenance and storage facilities 

o ADA station compliance

o Eliminating deferred capital work backlog on Amtrak-owned NEC assets 

o NEC capital renewal backlog projects

• National Network:

o New passenger rolling stock to replace obsolete passenger equipment used in 

Amtrak’s long-distance and state supported services, and associated rehabilitation, 

upgrade, or expansion of related maintenance and storage facilities 

o ADA station compliance

o Eliminating deferred capital work backlog on Amtrak-owned railroad assets not 

located on the NEC

o Projects to eliminate the backlog of obsolete assets associated with Amtrak’s 

national rail passenger transportation system, such as systems for reservations, 

security, training centers, and technology

o Restoration and Enhancement Grants: Each fiscal year, at least $50M shall be used 

for competitive operating assistance grants to applicants for the purpose of 

initiating, restoring, or enhancing intercity rail passenger transportation. 

Amtrak BIL Supplemental Authorizations

The Federal Railroad Administration supports the nation’s rail network through a variety of competitive 

and directed grant programs designed to improve safety and improve the mobility of people and 

goods. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) (Section 22101) significantly increased Amtrak Annual 

Grant authorized appropriations. The key elements of the Amtrak Annual Grant program are 

addressed in the Amtrak Annual Grant Program Fact Sheet. 

This fact sheet addresses supplemental authorized amounts for Amtrak in the BIL for FY22-FY26, 

for specific project and program types on the Northeast Corridor and National Network 

(BIL Division J, Title VIII) (see Table 2). This is the first time Amtrak has received an advance 

appropriation that allows them to build a multi-year project schedule.

Amtrak BIL Supplemental Authorizations Fact Sheet

FY22-FY26 Funding: $22 Billion

ADVANCED APPROPRATIONS

FOR THE MOST UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION, VISIT FRA’S WEBSITE: https://railroads.dot.gov/BIL
No. 43048.

#### Protests 979921-G, etc., of Hutzler Bros. Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

JOANNE BAKER,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action 2:12-cv-00143

v. Judge George C. Smith 

Magistrate Judge Deavers

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the September 12, 2012 Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 15). The Magistrate Judge recommended

that the Court grant the parties’ Joint Stipulation and Motion for Remand (ECF No. 14) and

remand this case to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 

The Report and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that their failure to

object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report would result in a

“waiver of the right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal

the judgment of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 2, ECF No. 15). The time

period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Neither party has

objected to the Report and Recommendation. 

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections

have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the

Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 15.) Accordingly, this action is REMANDED to the

Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. The Clerk is DIRECTED to

Case: 2:12-cv-00143-GCS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 10/11/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
terminate this case from the Court’s active case list. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00143-GCS-EPD Doc #: 16 Filed: 10/11/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 13
- 00130
- CR ROBERT EARL JONES , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 11
- 03851
- CRF
- 85

ABATEMENT ORDER
On April 17, 2013, Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal of the trial court’s judgment signed and entered on April 8, 2013. In the notice of appeal, Appellant states that he is indigent.
T he appointment of counsel for an indigent defendant in a criminal case is under the sole authority of the trial court. See Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907

- 08 (Tex. App.

— Waco 1999, order) ; T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 26.04(a) (West Supp. 2011); cf. Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684 , 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The Court abate s this causeJones v. State Page 2

to the trial court with instructions to determine whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel and a free record.
W ithin t wen ty

- one (21) days after the date of this order , the trial court shall conduct a hearing, if necessary, and make the above determination. The trial court clerk and court reporter shall file any supplemental records within thirt y - five (35) days after
the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis , and Justice Scoggins Cause abated Order issued and filed May 16, 2013 Do n ot p ublish
**Exhibit
      31.2**




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Mark
      S. Robinow, certify that:




1. I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kona Grill, Inc.;




2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;




4. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;




b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
      report based on such evaluation; and




c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
      registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and
      report financial information; and




b) Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.






/s/MARK
                S. ROBINOWMark
                S. Robinow*Chief
                Financial Officer*




Date:
      August 4, 2006
LOUISVILL E

REGIONA L AIRPOR T AUTHORITY ' Marc h 12,201 0

Th e Honorabl e Raymon dH . LaHoo d Secretary U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-20104B I
P.O . 80X912 9 Dear

Mr . Secretary : LOUISVILLE , K Y
40209-012 9
TE L 502/368-652 4 O n behal f o f th e Louisvill e Regiona l Airport Authorit y I woul dlik e t o expres s ou r support for th e applicatio n for

antitrus t immunit y an dpropose djoin t busines s agreemen t

file db y America n Airline s an dJapa n Airlines . Th e propose dallianc e woul denabl e thes e tw o airline s to cooperat e mor e closel y t o improv e trave l choices , offe

r mor e convenien t

schedules , an dprovid e customer s with mor e opportunitie s t o earn an dredee mfrequen t flyer miles . In addition , thi s allianc e woul dstimulat e competitio n amon g th e thre e majo r globa l airlin e alliance s whic h wil l further

enhanc e trave l choice s an dschedule s for th e consumer . FA X ADMINISTRATIV E 502/367-019 9
FA X ENGINEERIN G 502/368-589 5 Eas y acces s t o th e US-Asi amarketplac e i s importan t t o Louisvill e an dou r

man y corporat e partners . W e welcom e th e enhance dacces s t o th e globa l marketplace , ne w schedulin g option s an dcompetitio n tha t th e AA/JA L allianc e offer s an dw e encourag e th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n for antitrus t immunity .
FA X MAINTENANCE / PURCHASIN G AN D PROCUREMEN T 502/380-827 0
LOUISVILL E INTERNATIONA L AIRPOR T Sincerel y

Charles "Skip " Miller , A.A.E . Executiv e Directo r

BOWMA N FIEL D

e-mai L lraa@flylouisville.co m vnv/il/lows.nlle.com
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation ("we", "us", "our") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of our operations.

Date: August 12, 2010

 

/s/ Berger A. Dodge

Berger A. Dodge,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
No. 64304.

protest 59/15006 (New York).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that one case, containing “20 dozen pairs Slipper Sox, Item #610/2,” reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the one case of merchandise, which was reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Carl E. Sassano, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Transcat, Inc., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transcat, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: February 6, 2006 /s/ Carl E. Sassano     Carl E. Sassano  Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer