RPTv4_6_3.dot 10845 Report_R1
10052009 01460010845 

### REPORT ON ENGINEERING TESTING

Performed for: DRESSER WAUKESHA
CATALYST INLET AND OUTLET WAUKESHA, WI

Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 CleanAir Project No: 10845 Revision 1: October 5, 2009

To the best of our knowledge, the data presented in this report are accurate, complete, error free, legible and representative of the actual emissions during the test program.

Submitted by, Reviewed by,

_________________________________ _________________________________ Scott Lehmann Midwest Engineering Group Leader
slehmann@cleanair.com (800) 627-0033 ext. 4660 Scott Brown Project Manager
sbrown@cleanair.com (800) 627-0033 ext. 4544 Dresser Waukesha
1101 West St. Paul Ave.

Waukesha, WI 53188

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

REVISION HISTORY ii

Revision 1, Final 

### REPORT ON ENGINEERING TESTING

DRAFT REPORT REVISION HISTORY

Revision: Date Pages Comments
D0a 09/14/09 All Draft version of original document.
D0b 09/22/09 Appendices A through E Finalize appendices.

FINAL REPORT REVISION HISTORY

Revision: Date Pages Comments
0 09/24/09 All Final version of original document.

1 10/05/09 Cover, ii

1-3

A-4 Clarification to text.
Correction in sampling time.

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

CONTENTS iii

Revision 0, Final 1 PROJECT OVER VIEW.....................................................................................................1-1 INTRODUCTIO N ..............................................................................................................1-1 Key Project Part icipants ...............................................................................................1-1 Test Program Pa rameters ............................................................................................1-1
TEST PROGRAM SYNOPSIS..........................................................................................1-2

Test Schedul e...............................................................................................................1-2

Table 1-1: Schedule of Activi ties ............................................................................................1- 2
Discussion of Test Program .........................................................................................1-2

2 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................ .2-1
Table 2-1: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 1-3.................................2-1 Table 2-2: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 4-6.................................2-1 Table 2-3: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 7-9.................................2-2 Table 2-4: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 10-12 .............................2-2 Table 2-5: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 13-15 .............................2-3 Table 2-6: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 16-18 .............................2-3 Table 2-7: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 19-21 .............................2-4 Table 2-8: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 22-24 .............................2-4 Table 2-9: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 25-27 .............................2-5 Table 2-10: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 28-30 ...........................2-5 Table 2-11: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 31-33 ...........................2-6 Table 2-12: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 34-36 ...........................2-6 Table 2-13: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 37-39 ...........................2-7 Table 2-14: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 40-42 ...........................2-7 Table 2-15: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 43-45 ...........................2-8 Table 2-16: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditi on 46 ..................................2-8

3 DESCRIPTION OF IN STALLATI ON................................................................................3-1 PROCESS DESCRI PTION...............................................................................................3-1
Figure 3-1: Catalyst In let Sampling Point ...............................................................................3-1 DESCRIPTION OF SAMPL ING LOCATI ON ....................................................................3-2

Table 3-1: Sa mpling Po ints ....................................................................................................3 -2

4 METHODOL OGY .............................................................................................................4-1
Table 4-1: Summary of Sampling Pr ocedures ........................................................................4-1

5 APPENDIX....................................................................................................................... .5-1 TEST METHOD SPEC IFICATIONS ....................................................................................A
SAMPLE CALCUL ATIONS..................................................................................................B
PARAMETERS ....................................................................................................................C

FIELD DATA PR INTOUTS ..................................................................................................D

PLANT DATA..................................................................................................................... ..E

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

PROJECT OVERVIEW 1-1

Revision 0, Final 

### INTRODUCTION Dresser Waukesha (Waukesha) contracted Clean Air Engineering (CleanAir) to perform a test program at its facility, located in Waukesha, Wisconsin, for engineering purposes. The testing was to assist Waukesha in its efforts to provide the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with high quality data, in regards to the emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from an engine at various operating conditions, for consideration in EPA’s development of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for these types of engines.

Key Project Participants
Individuals responsible for coordinating and conducting the test program were:

Dennis Spaulding – Dresser Waukesha
Mac Cochrane – CleanAir

Test Program Parameters
The testing performed at the inlet and outlet of the catalyst on a Waukesha model L7044GSI engine, located in Laboratory Cell #17, on August 5 through 8, 2009, included the following measurements:

• formaldehyde

• acetaldehyde

• acrolein

Additionally, Waukesha recorded the following measurements during the testing:

• engine speed

• horsepower

• temperature

• pressure

• oxygen (O 2 

### )

• nitrogen oxides (NO X 

### )

• carbon dioxide (CO 2 

### )

• carbon monoxide (CO)

• total hydrocarbons (THC) 1 Project Overview

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

PROJECT OVERVIEW 1-2

Revision 0, Final 

### TEST PROGRAM SYNOPSIS

Test Schedule
The on-site schedule followed during the test program is outlined in Table 1-1.

Table 1-1: Schedule of Activities

Condition Date Start

Time End

Time Condition Date Start

Time End

Time

Condition 1 08/05/09 09:36 11:11 C ondition 24 08/06/09 13:26 13:49

Condition 2 08/05/09 12:03 12:25 C ondition 25 08/06/09 13:58 14:20

Condition 3 08/05/09 12:34 12:59 C ondition 26 08/06/09 14:27 14:50

Condition 4 08/05/09 13:18 13:44 C ondition 27 08/06/09 15:20 15:42

Condition 5 08/05/09 13:55 14:17 C ondition 28 08/06/09 15:49 16:13

Condition 6 08/05/09 14:27 14:49 C ondition 29 08/06/09 16:24 16:56

Condition 7 08/05/09 14:58 15:21 C ondition 30 08/06/09 17:02 17:24

Condition 8 08/05/09 16:49 17:11 C ondition 31 08/06/09 17:29 17:51

Condition 9 08/05/09 17:27 17:50 C ondition 32 08/07/09 06:56 07:18

Condition 10 08/05/09 18:13 18:34 C ondition 33 08/07/09 07:27 07:49

Condition 11 08/06/09 06:41 07:03 C ondition 34 08/07/09 08:02 08:24

Condition 12 08/06/09 07:13 07:36 C ondition 35 08/07/09 08:40 09:01

Condition 13 08/07/09 15:56 16:19 C ondition 36 08/07/09 09:08 09:30

Condition 14 08/06/09 08:16 08:39 C ondition 37 08/07/09 17:12 17:35

Condition 15 08/06/09 08:44 09:07 C ondition 38 08/07/09 10:50 11:11

Condition 16 08/06/09 09:10 09:35 C ondition 39 08/07/09 17:42 18:04

Condition 17 08/06/09 09:40 10:02 C ondition 40 08/07/09 11:46 12:07

Condition 18 08/06/09 10:12 10:35 C ondition 41 08/07/09 12:20 12:42

Condition 19 08/06/09 10:43 11:08 C ondition 42 08/07/09 12:48 13:11

Condition 20 08/06/09 11:26 11:48 C ondition 43 08/08/09 07:04 07:28

Condition 21 08/06/09 11:57 12:19 C ondition 44 08/08/09 07:34 07:57

Condition 22 08/06/09 12:27 12:49 C ondition 45 08/08/09 08:05 08:28

Condition 23 08/06/09 12:59 13:20 C ondition 46 08/08/09 06:31 06:52



### Discussion of Test Program
Formaldehyde, acrolein and acetaldehyde concentrations were obtained by Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectrometry, per EPA Method 320. The FTIR measurements were made on a hot-wet basis using an extractive system manufactured by MKS. The FTIR measurements followed the “Protocol for the Use of Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectrometry for the Analysis of Gaseous Emissions from Stationary Sources”, Addendum to Test Method 320, 40 CFR 63 Appendix A. In accordance with the method, exhaust gas was continuously extracted through heated Teflon sample lines and directly interfaced with the FTIR
instrumentation.

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

PROJECT OVERVIEW 1-3

Revision 1, Final 

### TEST PROGRAM SYNOPSIS (CONTINUED) The sampling system utilized a Teflon line surrounded by a heated stainless steel probe for gas withdrawal at the stack location. The exit of the probe was followed by stainless steel tee, which allowed system calibrations and spiking. A heated Teflon sample line and a heated head pump delivered the exhaust gases to the FTIR system.

Sampling line, filter, pump and sampling valve temperatures of greater than 300°F were maintained to reduce the potential of analyte loss in the sampling system. The gas stream remained heated all the way into the FTIR analyzer.

The MKS Model 2030 FTIR analyzer consists of a medium-high resolution interferometer, heated fixed path absorption cell, a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector (liquid nitrogen-cooled), electronics package and computer. The gas transport path inside the FTIR and the absorption cell was maintained at 150°C.

MKS-Online Corporation produced the interferometer/electronics package. It is operated at a nominal spectral resolution of 0.5 wavenumber (0.5 cm -1 

### ). The heated absorption cell has a fixed pathlength of 5.5 meters. The mirrors and cell interior are gold-plated.

Computer software was used to control the sampling system, acquire spectra and post process the spectra to provide quantification of the analyses in the sample. The software used was produced by MKS. The MKS library was utilized for this testing. Since IR analysis is inherently non-linear, it is imperative to use a multi-point calibration like those in the MKS library. While many of the EPA libraries reference spectra agree favorably with the MKS, formaldehyde is not one of them. The MKS formaldehyde calibration is in agreement with several respected laboratories, some of which utilize these libraries for certification of calibration gases. The acrolein data was reprocessed utilizing a different reference method, still within the MKS library, in order to reduce interferences. Utilizing this reference method, an MDL of 1.18ppm was
obtained.

The minimum detection limit for the FTIR data was determined by taking the standard deviation of the compounds of interest during Condition 1 and multiplied it by a factor of 3, which is suggested in ASTM D6348-03, Annex 2, MDC#2.

Several of the plant data points collected for oxygen was slightly negative. These values were treated as zero for calculation purposes.

A detailed presentation of the test conditions and results of analysis are shown in Tables 2-1 through 2-16 on pages 2-1 through 2-8.

End of Section 1 – Project Overview

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

RESULTS 2-1

Revision 0, Final Table 2-1: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 1-3

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 9:36 10:37 12:03 12:15 12:34 12:47 Stop 10:18 11:11 12:14 12:25 12:46 12:59

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,681 1,681 1,173 1,173 976 976

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.34 11.90 11.41 11.96 11.52 11.91 Oxygen (%) 0.34 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.33 0.05 Moisture (%) 14.44 19.62 19.35 19.64 19.30 19.60

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 3.76 <0.23 7.41 <0.23 6.89 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0004 <0.0005 <0.0103 <0.0103 <0.0091 <0.0091 Acetaldehyde <0.0004 <0.0005 <0.0106 <0.0105 <0.0093 <0.0093 Formaldehyde 0.0007 <0.0001 0.0349 <0.0021 0.0285 <0.0018 1 5-Aug 2 5-Aug 3 5-Aug

Table 2-2: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 4-6

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 13:29 13:44 13:55 14:07 14:27 14:39 Stop 0:00 0:00 14:05 14:17 14:38 14:49

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,403 1,402 1,683 1,683 1,683 1,683

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.45 11.95 11.39 11.81 11.46 11.91 Oxygen (%) 0.33 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.38 0.07 Moisture (%) 19.36 19.64 19.43 19.62 19.36 19.56

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 6.14 <0.23 5.05 <0.23 5.90 0.24

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0053 <0.0053 <0.0059 <0.0059 <0.0072 <0.0071 Acetaldehyde <0.0054 <0.0054 <0.006 <0.0061 <0.0073 <0.0073 Formaldehyde 0.0148 <0.0011 0.0136 <0.0012 0.0192 0.0008 4 5-Aug 5 5-Aug 6 5-Aug 

### 2 Results

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

RESULTS 2-2

Revision 0, Final Table 2-3: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 7-9

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 14:58 15:10 16:49 17:02 17:27 17:39 Stop 15:09 15:21 17:00 17:11 17:37 17:50

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,176 1,175 1,403 1,403 1,687 1,687

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.44 11.87 11.43 11.93 11.45 11.98 Oxygen (%) 0.41 0.11 0.29 0.00 0.32 0.00 Moisture (%) 19.30 19.54 19.45 19.58 19.39 19.65

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 7.84 <0.23 6.05 <0.23 5.63 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0102 <0.0101 <0.006 <0.006 <0.0058 <0.0058 Acetaldehyde <0.0104 <0.0104 <0.0061 <0.0061 <0.006 <0.006 Formaldehyde 0.0363 <0.002 0.0165 <0.0012 0.0149 <0.0012 7 5-Aug 8 5-Aug 9 5-Aug

Table 2-4: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 10-12

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 18:13 18:24 6:41 6:53 7:13 7:25 Stop 18:23 18:34 6:52 7:03 7:24 7:36

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,684 1,684 1,680 1,680 1,680 1,680

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.47 11.98 11.45 11.97 11.48 12.00 Oxygen (%) 0.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.32 0.00 Moisture (%) 19.38 19.68 19.37 20.45 19.40 19.85

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 5.57 <0.23 5.60 <0.23 5.36 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0072 <0.0072 <0.0073 <0.0073 <0.0072 <0.0072 Acetaldehyde <0.0074 <0.0074 <0.0074 <0.0075 <0.0074 <0.0074 Formaldehyde 0.0184 <0.0014 0.0185 <0.0015 0.0177 <0.0014 10 5-Aug 11 6-Aug 12 6-Aug

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

RESULTS 2-3

Revision 0, Final Table 2-5: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 13-15

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 16:09 15:56 8:16 8:28 8:44 8:56 Stop 16:19 16:07 8:26 8:39 8:55 9:07

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,683 1,683 1,681 1,680 1,680 1,680

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.48 11.99 11.50 12.02 11.48 11.99 Oxygen (%) 0.32 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.32 0.00 Moisture (%) 20.34 21.08 19.44 19.78 19.37 19.71

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 5.04 0.63 4.97 <0.23 5.44 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0051 <0.0051 <0.0076 <0.0076 <0.0074 <0.0074 Acetaldehyde <0.0052 <0.0052 <0.0078 <0.0078 <0.0076 <0.0076 Formaldehyde 0.0117 0.0015 0.0173 <0.0015 0.0183 <0.0015 14 6-Aug 15 6-Aug 13 7-Aug

Table 2-6: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 16-18

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 9:10 9:24 9:40 9:52 10:12 10:24 Stop 9:22 9:35 9:50 10:02 10:23 10:35

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,680 1,681 1,199 1,194 984 985

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.50 12.02 11.52 11.98 11.58 11.92 Oxygen (%) 0.32 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.37 0.13 Moisture (%) 19.35 19.68 19.34 19.66 19.41 19.56

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 5.45 <0.23 6.49 <0.23 7.21 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0073 <0.0073 <0.01 <0.01 <0.0086 <0.0086 Acetaldehyde <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0103 <0.0103 <0.0088 <0.0088 Formaldehyde 0.0181 <0.0015 0.0297 <0.002 0.0283 <0.0017 16 6-Aug 17 6-Aug 18 6-Aug

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

RESULTS 2-4

Revision 0, Final Table 2-7: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 19-21

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 10:43 10:56 11:26 11:38 11:57 12:09 Stop 10:55 11:08 11:37 11:48 12:08 12:19

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,687 1,688 980 980 1,541 1,542

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.44 11.77 11.55 12.01 11.48 11.88 Oxygen (%) 0.23 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.27 0.00 Moisture (%) 19.31 19.67 19.30 19.64 19.36 19.70

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 3.78 <0.23 6.84 <0.23 4.63 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0046 <0.0046 <0.0127 <0.0126 <0.0048 <0.0049 Acetaldehyde <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.013 <0.0129 <0.005 <0.005 Formaldehyde 0.0078 <0.0009 0.0395 <0.0025 0.0102 <0.001 19 6-Aug 20 6-Aug 21 6-Aug

Table 2-8: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 22-24

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 12:27 12:39 12:59 13:10 13:26 13:38 Stop 12:38 12:49 13:09 13:20 13:37 13:49

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,401 1,402 1,176 1,175 1,682 1,681

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.47 11.89 11.52 11.94 11.53 11.98 Oxygen (%) 0.26 0.00 0.40 0.09 0.34 0.03 Moisture (%) 19.34 19.69 19.42 19.58 19.40 19.71

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 4.78 <0.23 6.76 <0.23 4.94 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.008 <0.008 <0.0085 <0.0084 <0.0056 <0.0056 Acetaldehyde <0.0082 <0.0082 <0.0087 <0.0086 <0.0058 <0.0058 Formaldehyde 0.0175 <0.0016 0.0261 <0.0017 0.0126 <0.0011 22 6-Aug 23 6-Aug 24 6-Aug

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

RESULTS 2-5

Revision 0, Final Table 2-9: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 25-27

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 13:58 14:10 14:27 14:39 15:20 15:31 Stop 14:08 14:20 14:38 14:50 15:29 15:42

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,403 1,403 1,172 1,172 1,196 1,196

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.53 11.96 11.44 11.90 11.48 11.87 Oxygen (%) 0.35 0.03 0.30 0.00 0.38 0.12 Moisture (%) 19.41 19.62 19.26 19.68 19.41 19.45

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 5.92 <0.23 5.93 <0.23 7.03 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.009 <0.009 <0.0086 <0.0086 <0.0072 <0.0071 Acetaldehyde <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0088 <0.0088 <0.0073 <0.0073 Formaldehyde 0.0243 <0.0018 0.0233 <0.0017 0.0229 <0.0014 25 6-Aug 26 6-Aug 27 6-Aug

Table 2-10: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 28-30

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 15:49 16:00 16:24 16:46 17:02 17:14 Stop 15:59 16:13 16:44 16:56 17:12 17:24

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 974 975 974 974 1,397 1,397

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.55 11.87 11.56 11.89 11.48 11.94 Oxygen (%) 0.35 0.11 0.36 0.13 0.36 0.04 Moisture (%) 19.55 19.49 19.50 19.40 19.58 19.46

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 6.52 <0.23 7.86 0.28 5.66 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0087 <0.0087 <0.0076 <0.0075 <0.0053 <0.0053 Acetaldehyde <0.0089 <0.0089 <0.0077 <0.0077 <0.0054 <0.0055 Formaldehyde 0.0259 <0.0017 0.0271 0.0010 0.0137 <0.0011 28 6-Aug 29 6-Aug 30 6-Aug

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

RESULTS 2-6

Revision 0, Final Table 2-11: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 31-33

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 17:29 17:40 6:56 7:08 7:27 7:39 Stop 17:38 17:51 7:07 7:18 7:37 7:49

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,396 1,396 975 975 1,431 1,431

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.49 11.91 11.44 11.88 11.43 11.84 Oxygen (%) 0.27 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.40 0.11 Moisture (%) 19.30 19.59 17.32 19.50 19.30 20.53

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 4.77 <0.23 5.25 <0.23 5.37 0.51

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0072 <0.0072 <0.0075 <0.0076 <0.0053 <0.0054 Acetaldehyde <0.0074 <0.0074 <0.0077 <0.0077 <0.0055 <0.0055 Formaldehyde 0.0157 <0.0014 0.0179 <0.0015 0.0131 0.0013 31 6-Aug 32 7-Aug 33 7-Aug

Table 2-12: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 34-36

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 8:02 8:13 8:40 8:52 9:08 9:19 Stop 8:12 8:24 8:50 9:01 9:18 9:30

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,197 1,198 978 978 1,075 1,076

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.44 11.83 11.48 11.91 11.45 11.90 Oxygen (%) 0.40 0.14 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.00 Moisture (%) 19.37 19.86 19.17 19.16 20.83 20.21

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 7.12 0.67 6.37 0.51 5.42 0.44

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.009 <0.009 <0.0087 <0.0086 <0.0068 <0.0068 Acetaldehyde <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.0089 <0.0088 <0.007 <0.007 Formaldehyde 0.0294 0.0028 0.0252 0.0020 0.0169 0.0014 34 7-Aug 35 7-Aug 36 7-Aug

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

RESULTS 2-7

Revision 0, Final Table 2-13: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 37-39

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 17:12 17:25 10:50 11:02 17:42 17:53 Stop 17:23 17:35 11:00 11:11 17:51 18:04

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,197 1,198 1,079 1,079 1,400 1,400

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.52 11.90 11.52 11.92 11.48 11.98 Oxygen (%) 0.38 0.11 0.40 0.13 0.35 0.00 Moisture (%) 19.93 20.19 18.85 18.02 20.08 20.14

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 6.77 0.26 7.24 0.75 6.55 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0069 <0.0069 <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0059 <0.0059 Acetaldehyde <0.0071 <0.0071 <0.0077 <0.0077 <0.0061 <0.0061 Formaldehyde 0.0213 0.0008 0.0248 0.0026 0.0177 <0.0012 37 7-Aug 38 7-Aug 39 7-Aug

Table 2-14: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 40-42

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 11:46 11:57 12:20 12:32 12:48 13:01 Stop 11:56 12:07 12:30 12:42 12:59 13:11

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 976 976 1,437 1,437 1,538 1,538

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.56 12.01 11.46 11.94 11.54 11.95 Oxygen (%) 0.28 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.40 0.13 Moisture (%) 19.39 19.03 19.29 18.86 18.87 18.62

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 5.28 0.33 5.53 0.25 5.62 0.51

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.01 <0.01 <0.0053 <0.0053 <0.007 <0.0069 Acetaldehyde <0.0103 <0.0102 <0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0071 <0.0071 Formaldehyde 0.0241 0.0015 0.0134 0.0006 0.0179 0.0016 41 7-Aug 42 7-Aug 40 7-Aug

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

RESULTS 2-8

Revision 0, Final Table 2-15: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Conditions 43-45

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 7:04 7:16 7:34 7:46 8:05 8:17 Stop 7:14 7:28 7:44 7:57 8:15 8:28

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,682 1,682 972 972 1,172 1,172

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.34 11.73 11.50 11.86 11.34 11.77 Oxygen (%) 0.27 0.00 0.37 0.13 0.30 0.00 Moisture (%) 20.22 20.47 20.27 20.50 20.27 20.59

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 4.87 <0.23 7.60 <0.23 6.20 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.005 <0.005 <0.0124 <0.0124 <0.0063 <0.0064 Acetaldehyde <0.0051 <0.0052 <0.0128 <0.0127 <0.0065 <0.0065 Formaldehyde 0.0111 <0.001 0.0432 <0.0025 0.0179 <0.0013 45 8-Aug 43 8-Aug 44 8-Aug

Table 2-16: Laboratory Cell – Catalyst Inlet and Outlet – Condition 46

Condition Test Date (2009)
Start 6:42 6:31 Stop 6:52 6:41

Engine Parameters Load (hp) 1,080 1,080

Exhaust Parameters Pre-Cat Post- Cat Carbon Dioxide (%) 11.34 11.83 Oxygen (%) 0.33 0.00 Moisture (%) 20.40 20.42

HAPs Emissions (ppmwv)

Acrolein <1.18 <1.18 Acetaldehyde <1.20 <1.20 Formaldehyde 7.11 <0.23

HAPs Emissions (g/hp-hr)

Acrolein <0.0092 <0.0091 Acetaldehyde <0.0094 <0.0094 Formaldehyde 0.0298 <0.0018 46 8-Aug

End of Section 2 – Results

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

DESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION 3-1

Revision 0, Final 

### PROCESS DESCRIPTION Testing was performed in Laboratory Cell #17 on the exhaust gas stream of a Waukesha model L7044GSI engine. This engine is a spark-ignited, reciprocating, internal combustion engine that was burning utility pipeline, natural gas fuel. It operates on the four-stroke, Otto cycle that is typical of modern engines. The engine is of V-12 design with 9.375” bore x 8.5” stroke, displacement of 7040 cubic inches and 8:1 nominal compression ratio. It is turbocharged and intercooled.

All operation was at rich-burn, near stoichiometric (lambda nominally 0.995), combustion conditions for the proper chemical exhaust stream composition for use with a non-selective reduction catalyst (NSCR) (also known as a three-way catalyst). The catalyst used was a Maxim model 3WC 674-20. Emission measurements were made at both catalyst inlet (engine outlet) and catalyst outlet locations at every test condition.

Figure 3-1: Catalyst Inlet Sampling Point 

### 3 Description of Installation

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

DESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATION 3-2

Revision 0, Final 

### DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLING LOCATION Table 3-1 outlines the sampling point configurations.

Table 3-1: Sampling Points

Source

Constituent

Catalyst Inlet and Outlet Formaldehyde, Acrolein, Acetaldehyde EPA M320 All 1 1 5 varied Minutes per

Point Total

Minutes Method Run

No. Points per

Port Ports

End of Section 3 – Description of Installation

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

METHODOLOGY 4-1

Revision 0, Final 

### CleanAir utilized a modified EPA Method 320. The following table summarizes the method and its respective source.

Table 4-1: Summary of Sampling Procedures

Title 40 CFR Part 63 Appendix A Method 320 “Measurement of Vapor Phase Organic and Inorganic Emissions by Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy”



### This method appears in detail in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and on the World Wide Web at http://www.cleanair.com.

Diagrams of the sampling apparatus and major specifications of the sampling, recovery and analytical procedures are summarized for each method in Appendix A.

CleanAir followed specific quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures as outlined in the individual methods and in EPA “Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III Stationary Source-Specific Methods”, EPA/600/R-94/038C. Additional QA/QC methods, as prescribed in CleanAir’s internal Quality Manual, were also followed.

End of Section 4 – Methodology 

### 4 Methodology

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

APPENDIX 5-1

Revision 0, Final TEST METHOD SPEC IFICATIONS ....................................................................................A
SAMPLE CALCUL ATIONS..................................................................................................B
PARAMETERS ....................................................................................................................C

FIELD DATA PR INTOUTS ..................................................................................................D

PLANT DATA..................................................................................................................... ..E 

### 5 A ppendix

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

Revision 1, Final 

### A TEST METHOD SPECIFICATIONS

# This Page Intentionally Left Blank

# This Page Intentionally Left Blank

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

Revision 0, Final 

### B SAMPLE CALCULATIONS

# This Page Intentionally Left Blank

# This Page Intentionally Left Blank

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

Revision 0, Final 

### C PARAMETERS

# This Page Intentionally Left Blank

# This Page Intentionally Left Blank

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

Revision 0, Final 

### D FIELD DATA PRINTOUTS

# This Page Intentionally Left Blank

# This Page Intentionally Left Blank

### DRESSER WAUKESHA Client Reference No: 21918 Rev. 1 WAUKESHA, WI CleanAir Project No: 10845

Revision 0, Final 

### E PLANT DATA

# This Page Intentionally Left Blank

# This Page Intentionally Left Blank