alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Consent(Director)


EXHIBIT
  10.01

SHOTGUN ENERGY CORPORATION

(the “Company”)



CONSENT TO ACT AS DIRECTOR

I
  hereby consent to act as a director of the Company and acknowledge that I am
  not disqualified to become or to act as a director under Chapter 78 of the
  Nevada Revised Statutes.

I hereby confirm that:

1

I am not under the age of 18 years;

2

I have not been found by a court, in the United States of America or elsewhere, to be incapable of managing my own affairs;

3

I am not an undischarged bankrupt; and

4

I have not been convicted in or out of Nevada of an offence in connection with the promotion, formation or management of a corporation or unincorporated business, or of an offence involving fraud.

 

In addition, the undersigned hereby consents to the holding of any meeting of the directors or of a committee of the directors of the Company by means of such telephonic, electronic or other communication facility, as permit all persons participating in the subject meetings to communicate adequately with each other.




This consent shall continue in effect from year to year so long as the undersigned is re-elected to the board of directors, provided that in the event that the undersigned revokes this consent or resigns from the board of directors, this consent shall cease to have effect from the date of receipt in writing by the Company of such revocation or resignation, as the case may be, or, if the latter, the effective date of such resignation.

DIRECTORS HAVE SUBSTANTIAL DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT LIABILITIES. THE PERSON SIGNING THIS CONSENT SHOULD OBTAIN INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE.

		
	Dated

	August
    7 ,
    2008


	Print name

	David
    Zhang 


	Address

	#6
    - 502 No. 14 Lixue Hutong Xidan 

  Xicheng District,
    Beijing, China 

  100031


	Signature

	/s/: David Zhang
**EXHIBIT 99.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Thomas & BettsCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended September 29, 2002 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
Dated this 11th day of November 2002.
     /s/ JOHN P. MURPHY      John P. Murphy *Senior Vice President and* *Chief Financial Officer*
Exhibit 32.1
------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.F. Hughes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.

/s/ J.F. Hughes
------------------------------
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
January 7, 2008
- FPL_1559ocr-1
- FPL_1559ocr-2
- FPL_1559ocr-3
- FPL_1559ocr-4
- FPL_1559ocr-5
- FPL_1559ocr-6
- FPL_1559ocr-7
- FPL_1559ocr-8
- FPL_1559ocr-9
- FPL_1559ocr-10
- FPL_1559ocr-11
- FPL_1559ocr-12
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM’S CONSENT

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Shell CompanyReport on Form 20-F of Lone Oak Acquisition Corporation of our report dated October 18, 2013, except for notes 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and8 as to which the date is December 12, 2013, with respect to our audit of the combined financial statements of Arabella Exploration,Limited Liability Company as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December31, 2011 appearing in the Shell Company Report on Form 20- F of Lone Oak Acquisition Corporation. We also consent to the referenceto our firm under the heading “Auditors” in such Report.

 

/s/ Ham, Langston & Brezina, LLP

 

Ham, Langston & Brezina, LLP

Houston, Texas

December 31, 2013
exv10w20






Exhibit 10.20




     This amendment to the Mineral lease agreement is made and entered into as of the 30th
day of April, 2008, by and between the Lewis Family Trust (the “Lessor”), and Ready Mix,
Inc., a Nevada Corporation (the “Lessee”).



     Except as noted below the original Mineral Lease Agreement entered into on the 1st
day of January 1999, shall remain unchanged.


ARTICLE 1.2 Term of Lease. The term of this lease shall be for ten years, commencing
on January 1, 2009 (the “Effective Date”), and terminating on January 1, 2019, subject to the
option to extend set forth in Section 11.1, and also subject to earlier termination, as set
forth in Section 1.3 and Section 12.2.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have executed this Lease Agreement as of the day and year
first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 
	LESSOR: 	THE LEWIS FAMILY TRUST

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Patricia Lewis, Trustee
 	 
	 	 	Patricia Lewis, Trustee   	 
	 	 	 
	 
	LESSEE: 	READY MIX, INC.,

A Nevada Corporation

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Robert Morris
 	 
	 	 	Robert Morris, President 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 




1
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>



                                                                     EXHIBIT 27.

                            FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
        

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                   10,658
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            23,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                709
<INVENTORY>                                                              19,473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         59,906
<PP&E>                                                                  151,383
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           73,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          281,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    37,360
<BONDS>                                                                  40,555
<COMMON>                                                                 17,514
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              176,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            281,640
<SALES>                                                                  46,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         46,301
<CGS>                                                                    29,493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            29,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          5,738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             28
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        1,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           9,857
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              3,983
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       5,874
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              5,874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                               .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               .36

        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 176 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 176

Congratulating Cam Neely on his induction into the Hockey Hall of Fame.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2005

 Mr. Kennedy submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating Cam Neely on his induction into the Hockey Hall of Fame.

Whereas on June 8, 2005, Cam Neely was elected to the Hockey Hall of Fame in 
        Toronto, Canada, and will be formally inducted into the Hall of Fame on 
        November 7, 2005;
Whereas as a member of the Boston Bruins, Cam Neely became one of ice hockey's 
        greatest players, defining the position of ``power forward'';
Whereas although his career was cut short when he retired at the age of 31 due 
        to injury, Cam Neely scored 395 goals and had 299 assists in 726 games 
        in his brilliant career;
Whereas Cam Neely led the Boston Bruins in goals for 7 seasons, led the team in 
        scoring for 2 seasons, and was the team's all-time leader in goals 
        during playoffs;
Whereas Cam Neely had three 50-goal seasons for the Boston Bruins, including 
        back-to-back 50-goal seasons in 1989-1990 and 1991-1992;
Whereas Cam Neely, returning to the Boston Bruins after an injury in 1993-1994, 
        scored 50 goals and was awarded the National Hockey League's Bill 
        Masterton Trophy as the ``player who best exemplifies the qualities of 
        perseverance, sportsmanship, and dedication to hockey'';
Whereas Cam Neely, number 8, became the tenth Boston Bruin to be honored by 
        having his uniform number retired; and
Whereas Cam Neely continues to provide invaluable assistance to charitable 
        causes in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, including the establishment 
        of the Neely House and the Neely Foundation, which comfort, support, and 
        offer hope to cancer patients and their families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the extraordinary achievements of Cam Neely 
        during his brilliant career in ice hockey with the Boston 
        Bruins;
            (2) commends Cam Neely for his recent and eminently well-
        deserved induction into the Hockey Hall of Fame; and
            (3) directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit an 
        enrolled copy of this resolution to:
                    (A) Cam Neely;
                    (B) Jeremy Jacobs, owner of the Boston Bruins;
                    (C) Harry Sinden, president of the Boston Bruins; 
                and
                    (D) Mike Sullivan, head coach of the Boston Bruins.
                                 <all>
```
A90A0221.

#### SPARKS v. THE STATE.

(394 SE2d 407)

Carley, Chief Judge.

Appellant was tried by a jury and found guilty of possession of *590cocaine and driving under the influence of drugs in violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2). He appeals from the judgments of conviction and sentences entered by the trial court on the jury’s guilty verdicts. The sole enumeration of error raises the general grounds.

Decided May 11, 1990.

*Willis A. Duvall,*for appellant.

*J. Brown Moseley, District Attorney,*for appellee.

1. Appellant consented to give a urine sample. At the Georgia State Crime Lab, the sample tested positive for cocaine. “ ‘The presence of cocaine in a defendant’s bodily fluids is considered to be direct positive evidence of possession of cocaine. (Cit.)’ [Cits.] Accordingly, there was sufficient evidence produced at trial to authorize any rational trior of fact to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of possession of cocaine. [Cits.]” *Buffington v. State,*190 Ga. App. 365 (378 SE2d 884) (1989). See also *Stevens v. State,*165 Ga. App. 814, 815 (1) (302 SE2d 724) (1983).

2. The evidence that appellant had ingested cocaine was the only evidence adduced to show his violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2). However, that statute does not prohibit driving after ingesting any quantity of drugs. Compare OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (4). It prohibits driving “[u]nder the influence of any drug to the extent that it is less safe for [one] to drive. . . .” OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2). There was nothing from which the jury could have inferred that appellant was under the influence of cocaine *to the extent that he was a less safe driver,*such as additional evidence of his physical condition or conduct at the time of arrest. Under these circumstances, the evidence is not sufficient to convict appellant of driving under the influence in violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2). See *Turner v. State,*95 Ga. App. 157 (97 SE2d 348) (1957); *Clay v. State,*193 Ga. App. 377, 379 (2) (387 SE2d 644) (1989). Therefore, the conviction and sentence for violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2) must be set aside.

*Judgments affirmed in part and reversed in part.*

*McMurray, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                           1,406
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,385
<INVENTORY>                                     64,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,056
<PP&E>                                         150,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 469,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,979
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,389)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   469,789
<SALES>                                        163,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               164,239
<CGS>                                          120,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,070
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,784
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,043)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,536)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,507)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,507)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.41)


</TABLE>
# C_2008127EN.01000102.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5129 — Delta Lloyd/Swiss Life Belgium)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 127/02)

On 29 April 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5129. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5129. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-cr-046

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP

JAMES M. O’KEEFE, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On March 9, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant O’Keefe’s guilty plea to

Count One of the Information charging him with knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully distributing

oxycodon, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C).

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00046-GCS Doc #: 21 Filed: 04/02/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully distributing oxycodon, a Schedule II controlled substance,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00046-GCS Doc #: 21 Filed: 04/02/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007283EN.01004001.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/40

---

Action brought on 5 October 2007 — France v Council

(Case T-382/07)

(2007/C 283/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: E. Belliart, G. de Bergues and A.-L. During, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council Regulation (EC) No 809/2007 of 28 June 2007 amending Regulations (EC) No 894/97, (EC) No 812/2004 and (EC) No 2187/2005 as concerns drift nets (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Regulation (EC) No 809/2007 of 28 June 2007 amending Regulations (EC) No 894/97, (EC) No 812/2004 and (EC) No 2187/2005 as concerns drift nets (1);

1

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Regulation contested in the context of the present action is intended to give a uniform definition of drift nets. The applicant disputes the definition as laid down by the Regulation in that it includes nets such as ‘thonailles’ in the category of drift nets and thus includes them within the scope of the prohibition on their use laid down in Article 11a of Regulation No 894/97 (2).

2

In support of its action, firstly, the applicant submits that the contested regulation must be annulled because of lack of reasoning since it does not state the reasons for which it widens the scope of the restrictions on use applicable to drift nets to include stabilised nets such as thonailles.

Secondly, it submits that the contested regulation also breaches the principle of proportionality in that the prohibition of drift nets, as they are defined, is manifestly inappropriate having regard, on the one hand, to the objectives pursued by that prohibition and, on the other, to the particular characteristics of the thonaille in comparison with other types of drift net.

Finally, the applicant claims that the prohibition on drift nets as defined in Regulation No 809/2007 is discriminatory in that treating the thonaille type of net in the same manner as other drift nets is not justified, having regard to their characteristics.

---

(1)  OJ 2007 L 182, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 894/97 of 29 April 1997 laying down certain technical measures for the conservation of fishery resources (OJ 1997 L 132, p. 1).

2

---
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

MONTROSE P. FORD,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

CASE NO. C2-11-1139

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

COMMISSIONER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE NORAH MCCANN KING

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the OPINION AND ORDER filed February 28, 2013, JUDGMENT is

hereby entered pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). This case is REMANDED to

the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. 

Date: February 28, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-01139-EAS-NMK Doc #: 17 Filed: 02/28/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 45123.

#### Protests 949797-G, etc., of Alpha Importing Co. et al.

Abstract 44704. Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
No. 46292.

#### Protests 44444-K, etc., of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of iron drums not having removable heads, imported as containers of liquid rubber latex, and that it is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstracts 38363 and 39366. In accordance therewith the drums were held entitled to free entry as claimed.