alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, 

Petitioner,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-CV-112

Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge King

GREIF BROTHERS, INC.,

Respondent.

ORDER

On May 26, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended

that petitioner’s application for enforcement of its subpoena duces

tecum be granted. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 14. Although

the parties were advised of their right to object to the

recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so,

there has been no objection.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.

Petitioner’s application is GRANTED on the terms specified in the

Report and Recommendation.

This case will be terminated on the docket of this Court unless,

within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, a party

demonstrates cause why the case should remain pending.

 s/Algenon L. Marbley Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00112-ALM-NMK Doc #: 15 Filed: 07/06/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 53155.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 490242-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protests were dismissed.
Before the Third Division,

November 7, 1949

No. 53700.

protest 106420-K (Baltimore).

#### Equitable Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reas'ons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation (the“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald R. Peck,Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary ofthe Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 13,  2005 |   |
|----------------------|--------|
|                 |   |    /s/  Donald R. Peck |   |
|                 |   | Donald R. Peck |
|                 |   | Executive Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and willbe retained by The First Marblehead Corporation and furnished to the SEC or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
# C_2008084EN.01000301.xml

| 3.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 April 2008

(2008/C 84/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5632 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 159,4 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4576 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,7885 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3697 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5814 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 116,86 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,065 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,07 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 256,97 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6977 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,4932 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,7136 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 32,453 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0118 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7145 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5896 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,1751 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9759 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1567 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 524,59 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,3094 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,9712 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2731 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 350,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9858 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,638 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,918 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,288 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7122 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4996 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5632

JPY

Japanese yen

159,4

DKK

Danish krone

7,4576

GBP

Pound sterling

0,7885

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3697

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5814

ISK

Iceland króna

116,86

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,065

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,07

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

256,97

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6977

PLN

Polish zloty

3,4932

RON

Romanian leu

3,7136

SKK

Slovak koruna

32,453

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0118

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7145

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5896

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,1751

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9759

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1567

KRW

South Korean won

1 524,59

ZAR

South African rand

12,3094

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,9712

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2731

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 350,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9858

PHP

Philippine peso

64,638

RUB

Russian rouble

36,918

THB

Thai baht

49,288

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7122

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4996

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, CONTAINED IN TRANSCONTINENTAL
GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION'S 2000 FIRST QUARTER REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     68,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               766,874
<PP&E>                                       4,488,339
<DEPRECIATION>                                 824,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,685,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          459,710
<BONDS>                                        975,214
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,257,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,685,049
<SALES>                                        201,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               411,037
<CGS>                                          201,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  310,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,959
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,995
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,995
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
,,\ 

# . 

# Qlante 1Doran

••• c 

### Y t"}**(~** ..

March 19,2010

The Honorable RayLaHood United. States Department ofTransportation_ 1200 New Jersey Avenue,SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: On behalfofPlante & Moran, PLLC, I am writing to express our strong support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are almost 250 Japanese companiesJocated in Indiana and hundreds more whose business activities rely on access to Japan and its market. The growth ofour business ties with Japan has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Indiana corporate representatives look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. Indianapolis does not offer international service to Asia, and many ofour business travelers use Detroit as theirhub when flying to Japan. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia and is an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to**.-~~** 

## ..makeTfthe airlIne'sgafeway.toAsia.Tlie.addrtiOff-()fHanedaasadestination is a natural·fit that·· would clearly benefit our region. Thank you for consideration ofthis request. Sincerely,
.

## ~4// 

# .. 

# 3J

.. ... .... BlakeM.Roe Plante & Moran, PLLC

Illinois Chicago' Elgin Michigan Ann Arbor' Auburn Hills' Detroit. East Lansing Flint· Grand Rapids • Kalamazoo' Macomb' St. Joseph' Southfield' Traverse City Ohio Cleveland' Columbus' Toledo China Shanghai Mexico Monterrey plantemoran.com
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Sharkey, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.

/s/ John G. Sharkey
-----------------------------
Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
April 2, 2007































                                     Page 21
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



Itamar Zer the Principal
Accounting and Financial Officer, and Secretary  of Baby All Corp, certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for
the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|Date: April 12, 2012 | SafeCode Drug Technologies Corp                                                          
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |                                                                                          
|                     | By:                                                                                      
|                     | Name:
        Title:    Principal
        Accounting and Financial Officer, and Secretary



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Avinger, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Jeffrey Soinski, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Matthew Ferguson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies , pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), to his knowledge:

 

1.              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 27 day of March, 2015.

 

 
| /s/ JEFFREY   M. SOINSKI   |   | /s/ MATTHEW   B. FERGUSON                 |
|---------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
| Jeffrey   M. Soinski            |   | Matthew   B. Ferguson                          |
| *Chief Executive Officer*       |   | *Chief Financial Officer*                      |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)* |   | *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,756-01

EX PARTE JIMMY ANTHONY JIMENEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2016CR10783W IN THE 226 CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of burglary of a building and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.

He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the

county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

art. 11.07.

Applicant was released to mandatory supervision on August 15, 2019. While on release, he

was arrested for aggravated assault. Due to the arrest, the Parole Division issued a pre-revocation

(aka “blue”) warrant, and it was executed on January 13, 2020. According to the trial court,

Applicant remains incarcerated in the county jail on the blue warrant—over eight months to date.

Applicant alleges that the Board of Pardons and Paroles and the Parole Division have failed
2

to afford him a final parole revocation hearing before the 41 day after the parole warrant was st

executed, see TEX.GOV’T CODE § 508.282 (setting the 41-daydeadline), and that this denial of a final

parole revocation hearing within a reasonable time violates Due Process, Morrissey v. Brewer, 408

U.S. 471 (1972) (holding that a parolee is entitled to due process in parole revocation). The trial

court ordered the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice, Parole Division to file anaffidavit addressing

the issue raised. The affidavit states that a final revocation hearing has not been scheduled. The

affidavit incorrectly states that Applicant has been convicted on the new aggravated assault charge.

The trial court recommends that relief be granted by ordering the Board of Pardons and Paroles and

the Parole Division to dismiss the revocation proceedings and release Applicant from confinement.

This Court agrees. Section 508.254—titled “Detention Under Warrant”—concerns the

Board’s authority to detain a releasee pursuant to a blue warrant; Section 508.282—titled

“Deadlines”—provides the deadlines the Parole Board must follow. The habeas record shows that

no charge on the new assault offense has been filed. The Board of Pardons and Paroles and the Parole

Division has violated the 41-day deadline required by Section 508.282, and it has violated Due

Process as required by the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrissey v. Brewer, supra. The Board of

Pardons and Paroles and the Parole Division is ordered to immediately dismiss the current parole

revocation proceeding, and Applicant is to be released from confinement based on it. Mandate shall

issue on the same date this opinion is delivered.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: October 7, 2020

Do not publish
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50428 Conference Calendar

BENNY EUGENE TRIMBLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ANTHONY FITZWATER, CO III; ALLEN KEEFE, Sergeant; JACK/JACKIE EDWARDS,
Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-96-CV-337

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Benny Eugene Trimble, Texas prisoner #382326, has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim upon which reliefNo. 97-50428 -2- could be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). By moving for IFP, Trimble is challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Trimble does not contest the district court’s determination that he had not alleged any facts tending to show that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his safety. Rather, he challenges the court’s denial of his post-judgment motion seeking leave to file a second amended complaint. However, Trimble does not show that the district court abused its discretion in denying his post-judgment motion for leave to amend. See Briddle v. Scott , 63 F.3d 364, 379-81 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we uphold the district court’s order certifying that the appeal is not taken in good faith. Trimble’s request for IFP status is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as meritless. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. IFP DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Campbell, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of InfraREIT, Inc.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: March 12, 2018 | /s/ David A. Campbell                 |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                 | David A. Campbell                     |
|                 | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

DARRELL WHITE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-cv-153 

 Judge Sargus 

Magistrate Judge King

KEVIN STOTTS, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Final judgment dismissing this case has been entered. Opinion

and Order, Doc. No. 63; Clerk’s Judgment, Doc. No. 64. Under these

circumstances, plaintiff’s motion to stay, Doc. No. 65, is DENIED.

January 9, 2012 s/Norah McCann King 

 Date Norah McCann King

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:11-cv-00153-EAS-NMK Doc #: 67 Filed: 01/09/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 35.1








Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.


I, James W. P. Hall, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York corporation (the “Trustee”), state:
  (a) A review of the Trustee’s activities for the period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Trustee’s performance under the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated July 15, 2010 between MS Structured Asset Corp. as depositor (the “Depositor”) and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary, in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor and the Trustee (as amended in each such case, the “Trust Agreement”), has been made under my supervision.
  (b)  To the best of my knowledge and based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for Floating Rate Trust Series 2010-04 (IP)
   
  The Bank of New York Mellon, as TrusteeDate: March  8, 2013

/s/  James W. P. HallJames W. P. HallVice President