alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Ming Yang Wind Power Group Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chuanwei Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2014



|    |  |                    |  |                        
|--- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Chuanwei Zhang
|    |  | Name:              |  | Chuanwei Zhang         
|    |  | Title:             |  | Chief Executive Officer
RASHARD T. ROUISE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4956

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James O. Shelfer, Judge.

Rashard T. Rouise, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Sharkey, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.


/s/ John G. Sharkey
---------------------------
Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
January 3, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                       922
<INVENTORY>                                     10,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,417
<PP&E>                                          19,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,513
<BONDS>                                          9,428
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,585
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,549
<SALES>                                         61,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,192
<CGS>                                           57,829
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,874
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,018
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,856
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,856
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
# \ Norman Abbott, Plaintiff,


### v. HeatherTrant, Defendant. • I ill
_ II He 44



### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### Civil Action No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# fILED DEC· 92009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts 

# 09 2337

Before the Court is the plaintiffspro se complaint and application to proceed informa pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed because it fails to state a claim upon which reliefmay be granted. Plaintiffhas filed a Bivens action, alleging that a clerk inthe office ofthe Clerk ofCourt ofthe Supreme Court ofthe United States violated his civil rights by denying him access to the Supreme Court when she returned his submission with instructions and forms for filing a writ of certiorari. He further complains that the defendant interfered with his Seventh Amendment right to have his suit tried to ajury. He seeks compensatory andpunitive damages from the clerk. A clerk is generally immune from a suit for damages. See Sind ram v. Sud a, 986 F.2d 339 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (holding that "clerks, likejudges, are immune from damage suits for performance oftasks that are an integral part ofthejudicial process"). Furthermore, the plaintiffhas not stated a claim upon which reliefmay be granted, as he does not have a right to have his case heard in the Supreme Court ofthe United States.

# - 30S:



### A separate appropriate order accompanies th·
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THOMASTON MILLS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                       706
<INVENTORY>                                     34,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,295
<PP&E>                                         171,476
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,494
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,813
<SALES>                                         36,633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,668
<CGS>                                           35,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,024)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,024)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     421
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,603)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.55)


</TABLE>
Exhibit No. 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Roy Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust,
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

|                         | TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST(Registrant)                                             
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  November 14, 2003 | By:/s/ Roy Thomas
     Roy Thomas, General Agent
     and Chief Executive Officer
No. 65669.

#### Daido Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/15848, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152; C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Steam along with stamp collecting -- all aboard!

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Steam along with stamp collecting -- all aboard! 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Poster ; 602Poster (United States Postal Service)602. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  191 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  222023675.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Case No. 13,904.

#### THOMAS v. MAGRUDER.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 446.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1834.

Evidence — Deep op Emancipation — Record Copt.

A record copy ->f a deed of emancipation may be given in evidence by the petitioner, upon trial of a petition for freedom, without producing the original or accounting for its non-production.

[See Bank of U. S. v. Benning, Case No. 908.]

Petition for freedom [by Robert Thomas, a negro, against Elizabeth Magruder].

On the trial, Mr. Key, for petitioner,

offered in evidence the record of the deed of manumission from Reginald Magruder, recorded in the office of the clerk of this court.

Z. C. Dee objected and called for the original, and proof by the subscribing witnesses.

THE COURT

(MORSELL, Circuit Judge,

absent) refused to reauire Mr. Key to produce the original, and permitted him to use the copy on the record; it having been acknowledged and recorded according to Act Md. 1796, c. 67, §§ 28, 29.
Exhibit 15























CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-181076 on Form F-3 of our reports dated March 8, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Box Ships Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, and our report dated March 16, 2012, relating to the combined financial statements of Ardelia Navigation Ltd. and Eridanus Trading Co., appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012.











/s/ Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.


Athens, Greece


March 8, 2013
Case: 2:11-cv-00132-MHW-NMK Doc #: 59 Filed: 02/17/12 Page: 1 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00132-MHW-NMK Doc #: 59 Filed: 02/17/12 Page: 2 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00132-MHW-NMK Doc #: 59 Filed: 02/17/12 Page: 3 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00132-MHW-NMK Doc #: 59 Filed: 02/17/12 Page: 4 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00132-MHW-NMK Doc #: 59 Filed: 02/17/12 Page: 5 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T14:51:08-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
1 of 2 

02 MAY 2013 

Mr. Pat Mullen 

FAA - Small Airplane Directorate 

901 Locust St 

Room 301 

Kansas City, MO 64106 

USA 

Dear Mr. Mullen: 

SUBJECT: FAR 23.1549(b) - Exemption No. 10465 – APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION 

REFERENCE: FAA Docket Number: FAA-2011-1345 

Viking Air Limited (VAL) is currently working with Honeywell International Inc. (HI) to address 

compliance with 23.1549(b) to satisfy the “Conditions and Limitations” stated in the subject 

exemption. 

We have completed flight testing on a developmental load of software that permits VAL to display the 

“green arcs” (see photo 1) for DHC-6 Series 400 deliveries registered in the US. This option is being 

developed during HI’s current revision to their Apex platform. 

As shown above, HI is introducing changes, like their “Smart View” Synthetic Vision display to their 

system that will be available on all aircraft models that incorporate Apex. 

Photo 1 – Developmental Flight Testing 
2 of 2 

In addition to the optional Apex configurations, HI is completing the Apex functions that were not 

available during the initial certification of the DHC-6 Series 400. Two noteworthy items include the 

Autopilot and TCAS II systems. These systems will reduce the pilot’s workload and enhance 

situational awareness. 

To this date, VAL has exported four aircraft to the US, and plan on delivering two more aircraft this 

year, and one in 2014. Of these seven aircraft, six require the Autopilot and TCAS II systems. It is 

expected to take three weeks per aircraft to incorporate the modifications once they are approved. 

All seven aircraft are expected to be delivered before VAL has certification in July 2014 for the HI 

“Phase 2” configuration. Table A below shows the aircraft delivery schedule and the aircraft awaiting 

the upgrades. 

 Honeywell Phase 2 

S/N Customer Planned Delivery Autopilot TCAS II 

852 US Army Delivered Required Required 

862 US Army Delivered Required Required 

863 US Army Delivered Required Required 

869 DFAIR AUG 2013 Required Required 

870 TUDOR Delivered Required Required 

876 LOCH ARD JUN 2013 Not Ordered Not Ordered 

900 TWIN EXPRESS JUN 2014 Required Required 

Due to the small number of aircraft affected by Exemption No. 10465, and the fact that three of the 

seven aircraft are operated by one entity, VAL is requesting a 12 month extension to the exemption. 

This would ensure that aircraft delivered after July 31, 2014 will be fully compliant with 23.1549(b),

and all aircraft will be retrofitted within three months from that date (October 31, 2014). 

This additional time will enable our customers to schedule the incorporation of the exemption’s 

terminating action along with their “Phase 2” upgrades into a single maintenance event and keep their 

downtime to a minimum. 

Please contact the undersigned should the FAA require additional information or additional supporting 

data for this extension. 

Yours truly, 

Adam Dennis, P.Eng. 

Manager, Certification Engineering 

cc. 

Paul Arnell, TCCA - Pacific Region Jim Rutherford, FAA - Small Airplane Directorate

Table A – US Aircraft Deliveries
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9305 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to make grants 

to local governments for the training of local law enforcement officers 

on public health threats arising from violations of building codes, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 6, 2024 

Mr. COSTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

make grants to local governments for the training of 

local law enforcement officers on public health threats 

arising from violations of building codes, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRANTS TO TRAIN LOCAL ENFORCEMENT OF4 FICERS ON PUBLIC HEALTH THREATS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

6 Human Services, in consultation with the Secretary of 

7 Housing and Urban Development and the heads of other 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9305 IH

1 relevant agencies engaged in regulating building codes de2 termined necessary by the Secretary of Health and 

3 Human Services, shall award grants to local governments 

4 for the training of local enforcement officers on public 

5 health threats arising from violations of building codes. 

6 (b) USE OF FUNDS.—A local government receiving 

7 a grant under this section shall use the grant to— 

8 (1) develop and implement a training program 

9 for local enforcement officers on recognizing and re10 sponding to public health threats described in sub11 section (a); 

12 (2) partner with other local governments to col13 laborate on such training; 

14 (3) in carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2), co15 ordinate with relevant offices and agencies of the 

16 Federal, State, and local government, such as a pub17 lic health department; and 

18 (4) carry out any other activities deemed appro19 priate by the Secretary for training described in sub20 section (a). 

21 (c) APPLICATION.—To seek a grant under subsection 

22 (a), a local government shall submit an application to the 

23 Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing 

24 such information as the Secretary may require. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9305 IH

1 (d) PRIORITY.—In awarding grants under this sec2 tion, the Secretary shall give priority to applicants based 

3 on— 

4 (1) their capacity to provide the training de5 scribed in subsection (a); and 

6 (2) prioritizing areas where threats have been 

7 identified. 

8 (e) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘enforce9 ment officers’’ means those carrying out enforcement ac10 tivities and implement the latest published editions of rel11 evant consensus-based codes, specifications, and standards 

12 that incorporate the latest hazard-resistant designs and 

13 establish minimum acceptable criteria for the design, con14 struction, and maintenance of residential structures and 

15 facilities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this first amendment on Form 10-Q/A-1 (the
"Amendment") to the Quarterly Report of TransTechnology Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended December 26, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 12, 2005          /s/ Robert L. G. White
                               ---------------------------------------------
                               Robert L.G. White,
                               President & Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 12, 2005          /s/ Joseph F. Spanier
                               ---------------------------------------------
                               Joseph F. Spanier,
                               Chief Financial Officer