alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008207EN.01000901.xml

| 14.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/9

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2008/C 207/07)

OJ C 202 of 8.8.2008

OJ C 202 of 8.8.2008

History of previous publications:

OJ C 196 of 2.8.2008

OJ C 194 of 31.7.2008

OJ C 188 of 25.7.2008

OJ C 118 of 15.5.2008

OJ C 106 of 26.4.2008

OJ C 55 of 28.2.2008

---
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 84/2005

of 10 June 2005         

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) of the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 18o (Commission Regulation (EC) No 28/2004) of Annex XXI to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 13/2005 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 June 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 239, 15.9.2005, p. 59.

(2)OJ L 5, 7.1.2005, p. 5.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
### Section I: General Information
Format (xxx xxx xxxx) New primary contact for WaterSense Email and/or telephone update Please update your interests and preferences to receive more specific communications from WaterSense. 

### Section II: New Homes Information Please enter a number without commas. Please enter a number without commas.

*includes the use of turf or sod 

### Section III: Promotional Activities

Section IV: WaterSense Program Feedback Or g anization Name *  Please select... Contact Name * Email Telephone Contact Update?          

Total number of homes built in 2012: * Number of homes built in 2012 that earned the WaterSense label: * Markets (count y , state) where y ou build homes: *  

  What are y our t y pical landscapin g * practices on standard (non-WaterSense labeled) new homes (e. g . native plants, water-efficient features, turf limits, permeable pavers, etc.): *  

  For WaterSense labeled new homes, what do y ou t y picall y landscape*?  Please select...

Describe how y our compan y promoted WaterSense in 2012 (e. g ., We're for Water, communit y outreach, signage in homes promoting Wat erSense, advertising, etc.) *  

  Did y ou work with other WaterSense partn ers in 2012? If so, please describe y our activities.  

  To help WaterSense plan for the future, please describe how y ou plan to promote WaterSense in 2013. *  

  Pa g e 1 of 2In the interest of serving you better , EPA would like to learn more about your opinions and information needs regarding the WaterSense program. Pl ease complete the following section to provide feedback to EPA.

Yes No
Please go to the awards page for application materials and instructions. Award app lication materials will be available on the WaterSense pa rtner website by February 1.

On the following page, you will be asked to review your responses. You must select "confirm" at the bottom of the following page to submit your Annual Reporting Form to WaterSense. P lease note, you may need to try different printer settings or print as a PD F to print the full report for your records. We apologize for any inconvenience. N eed assistance with this form? On a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = most valuable), how valuable do y ou find the WaterSense pro g ram? *  Please select... How has WaterSense added value? *  

  On a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = most valuable), how valuable do y ou find the WaterSense partner website? *  Please select... In the past y ear, how often have y ou visited the partner website? *  Please select... B y completin g y our annual reportin g form, y ou will be eli g ible to appl y for a 2013 WaterSense Partner of the Year award. WaterSense en courages all partners to apply regardless of company size. Are you interested in applying for an award this year? *

          Help us improve the awards pro g ram b y tellin g us wh y y ou're not interested in appl y in g for an award. *  

  Please provide su gg estions for improvin g the WaterSense pro g ram (e. g ., tools/materials, webinar topics, communications, Helpline, websites, etc.) *  

  Pa g e 2 of 2
# C_2008178EN.01001001.xml

| 15.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 July 2008

(2008/C 178/13)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5847 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 169,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4607 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79750 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4674 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6232 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 121,55 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0525 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,310 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 230,21 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7028 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,2533 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5754 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,295 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9230 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6369 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5995 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,3657 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0830 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1485 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 592,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,0730 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,8473 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2325 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 502,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1194 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 71,652 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,8440 |
| THB | Thai baht | 53,325 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5316 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3002 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5847

JPY

Japanese yen

169,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4607

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79750

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4674

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6232

ISK

Iceland króna

121,55

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0525

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,310

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

230,21

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7028

PLN

Polish zloty

3,2533

RON

Romanian leu

3,5754

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,295

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9230

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6369

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5995

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,3657

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0830

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1485

KRW

South Korean won

1 592,62

ZAR

South African rand

12,0730

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,8473

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2325

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 502,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1194

PHP

Philippine peso

71,652

RUB

Russian rouble

36,8440

THB

Thai baht

53,325

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5316

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3002

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
No. 46875.

#### Protests 981917-G, etc., of G. Gennert, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

No witnesses were called by either side in this case but plaintiff cites Abstract 29189 in support of its claim. In compliance with one provision of the stipulation entered into by counsel at the hearing, the official sample was submitted to the Government chemist, who reported as follows: “The paper has been treated with a solution of synthetic resin (polymerized vinyl acetate).” In the stipulation the court's attention is called to a definition of gummed paper contained in the “Dictionary of Paper.” From that definition, together with the definitions of “syntheticresin” and “true resin,” as defined in“Synthetic Resins and Their Plastics,” it appeared that synthetic resin is neither a fish nor animal glue; nor does it appear to be a dextrin, as defined in Webster’s New International Dictionary, 1936 edition. On the record presented the court was of the opinion that the merchandise involved herein is neither gummed paper within the meaning of paragraph 1405 nor surface-coated paper under the same paragraph, for the same reason as given in the court’s decision in Abstract 29189. In accordance therewith the protests were overruled without affirming the collector’s classification.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 1 AND 2 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,400
<PP&E>                                         137,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,828
<BONDS>                                         13,844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           263
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,018
<SALES>                                          2,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,564
<CGS>                                            1,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (16)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (294)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9236)

#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 975258; 975259.

(Decided October 10, 1958)

*Eugene B. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement" enumerated in Schedule *“A,”*attached hereto and made a part thereof, consists of 4-Amino Azo Benzene 3.4 Disulphonic Acid which was appraised on an American selling price, as defined under the provisions of Section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, at $3.15 per pound, 100% basis, plus metal drums at $5.41 each.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the said merchandise is competitive with a product sold by the National Aniline Division, Allied Chemical & Dye Corporation, selling at $2.75 per pound, 100% basis, and that the correct American selling price for said 4-Amino Azo Benzene 3.4 Disulphonic Acid, as defined under the provisions of Section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is $2.75 per pound, 100% basis, plus metal drums at $5.41 each.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal for reap-praisement is abandoned as to any other merchandise listed on the invoices, and that these appeals may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved 4-Amino Azo Benzene 3.4 Disulphonic Acid, and that such value was $2.75 per pound, 100 per centum basis, plus metal drums at $5.41 each.

The appeals are dismissed as to all other merchandise. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2008085EN.01000801.xml

| 4.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/8

---

Call for proposals — ‘Preparatory Action MEDIA International’

(2008/C 85/06)

1.   Objectives and description

The ‘Preparatory Action MEDIA International’ is intended to examine and test cooperation activities between European film professionals and professionals of third countries. It covers:

| — | support for training, |
| --- | --- |

—

support for training,

| — | support for promotion, |
| --- | --- |

—

support for promotion,

| — | support for the development of cinema networks. |
| --- | --- |

—

support for the development of cinema networks.

Under the Work Programme for the ‘Preparatory Action MEDIA International’ for 2008, the Commission hereby invites consortia to submit proposals.

2.   Eligible candidates

The call is open to proposals from legal entities in the 27 EU Member States and any third country.

3.   Budget for projects

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals is EUR 1,98 million.

The financial support from the Commission cannot exceed 50 %, 75 % or 80 % of the total eligible costs, depending on the nature of the activity.

The financial contribution will be awarded in the form of a grant.

The maximum duration of projects is 12 months.

4.   Evaluation and selection

Proposals received will be evaluated by the Commission with the assistance of independent experts. The criteria used in the evaluation are defined in the MEDIA International Work Programme. Proposals that are successful in the evaluation process will be ranked in terms of quality. The process for the evaluation of applications for grants awarded by the Commission is set out in the Financial Regulation applicable to the General Budget of the European Communities (1).

1

5.   Deadline for submission of applications

Applications must be sent at the latest by 13 June 2008 to:

13 June 2008

| Ms Aviva Silver |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General Information Society and Media |
| Directorate A — Audiovisual, Media and Internet |
| Unit A2 — MEDIA programme and media literacy |
| Office BU33 02/005 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

Ms Aviva Silver

European Commission

Directorate-General Information Society and Media

Directorate A — Audiovisual, Media and Internet

Unit A2 — MEDIA programme and media literacy

Office BU33 02/005

B-1049 Brussels

6.   Full details

The full text of the call for proposals, together with the Work Programme, guidelines and application forms, can be found at the following Internet address:

http://ec.europa.eu/media

Applications must comply with all the terms of the call for proposals and be submitted on the form provided.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1). Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NETJETS INC., et al., 

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:12-cv-00059 

 Judge Gregory L. Frost 

v. Magistrate Judge Abel 

INTELLIJET GROUP, LLC, 

 Defendant.

ORDER

 Before the Court is a “Consent Motion to Hold Remaining Claims in Case Moot in Light 

of Recent Order” (“Consent Motion”) signed by both parties. (ECF No. 87.) The Consent 

Motion asks the Court to dismiss as moot the three remaining claims in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, 

and to strike the only remaining claim in Defendant’s Amended Counterclaim. 

For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the Consent Motion (ECF No. 87.) The 

remaining claims in Plaintiffs’ Complaint are DISMISSED AS MOOT pursuant to the Consent 

Motion. The remaining claim in Defendants’ Amended Counterclaim is STRICKEN. As a 

result of the foregoing, Plaintiffs’ pending Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony or Evidence 

Regarding Cancellation of Registration as Void Ab Initio is moot. The Clerk is DIRECTED to 

enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case on the docket records of the United States 

District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

 GREGORY L. FROST 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 2:12-cv-00059-GLF-NMK Doc #: 88 Filed: 01/21/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Apollo Acquisition Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jianguo Xu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of December 1, 2016.  /s/ Jianguo XuJianguo XuChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)  A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to Apollo Acquisition Corporation, and will be retained by Apollo Acquisition Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case No. 9,899.

#### Ex parte MUDD.

District Court, S. D. Florida.

Sept., 1868.

Homicide — Murder *of*the President of the United States in Time of War — Military Tribunal — Amnesty Proclamation 1868.

1. The crime of murdering the president of the United States, in time of civil war is triable by a military commission.

2. The crime of being accessory to the murder of the president was not embraced in the amnesty proclamation of 1868.

[Decided by

BOYNTON, District Judge.

Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible. The above statement of the points determined was taken from 2 Brightly, Dig. 101, 140.]
# C_2015245EN.01001902.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/19

---

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Schaeffler Technologies v Commission

(Case T-287/14) (1)

1

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 245/23)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Schaeffler Technologies GmbH & Co. KG (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, M. Ringel, C. Oehme and T. Wielsch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

| 3. | Schaeffler Technologies GmbH & Co. KG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Schaeffler Technologies GmbH & Co. KG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

| 4. | The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Marathon Patent Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doug Croxall, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: September 12, 2014


/s/ Doug CroxallDoug Croxall Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)