alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 136 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 136

  Designating the month of May 2005 as ``National Drug Court Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2005

  Mr. Biden (for himself, Mr. Sessions, and Mr. Coburn) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the month of May 2005 as ``National Drug Court Month''.

Whereas drug courts provide the focus and leadership for community-wide, 
        antidrug systems, bringing together public safety professionals and 
        other community partners in the fight against drug abuse and 
        criminality;
Whereas the results of more than 100 program evaluations and at least 3 
        experimental studies have yielded definitive evidence that drug courts 
        increase treatment retention and reduce substance abuse and crime among 
        drug-involved adult offenders;
Whereas the judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, substance abuse treatment 
        and rehabilitation professionals, law enforcement and community 
        supervision personnel, researchers and educators, national and community 
        leaders, and others dedicated to the movement have had a profound impact 
        within their communities; and
Whereas the drug court movement has grown from the 12 original drug courts in 
        1994 to 1,621 operational drug courts as of December 2004: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the month of May 2005 as ``National Drug 
        Court Month''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States and 
        interested groups to observe the month with appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
No. 43052.

#### Protests 829200-G, etc., of Sprouse-Reitz Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the household utensils in question are not plated nor composed of gold, silver, or platinum. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained on the authority of Abstract 39482.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 11, 2015

s0908

Order 

Clerk

September 11, 2015

148097 & (35)

JENNIFER STANKEVICH, a/k/a

JENNIFER MILLIRON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 148097

COA: 310710

Dickinson CC: 12-016939-DP

LEANNE MILLIRON,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

By order of April 25, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 

2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

DeBoer v Snyder, 772 F3d 388 (CA 6, 2014), and any attendant decision from the United 

States Supreme Court. On order of the Court, the case having been decided on June 26, 

2015, sub nom Obergefell v Hodges, ___ US ___; 135 S Ct 2584; 192 L Ed 2d 609 

(2015), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Obergefell. 

The motion to proceed on the application for leave to appeal is DENIED.
# C_2007315EN.01002001.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-441/06) (1)

1

(State aid - Duty of recovery - Duty of cooperation)

(2007/C 315/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Giolito, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and S. Ramet, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to give effect, within the prescribed period, to Commission Decision 2005/709/EC of 2 August 2004 on the State aid implemented by France for France Télécom (OJ 2005 L 269, p. 30) — Breach of Articles 2 and 3 of the decision and Article 10 EC and the fourth paragraph of Article 249 EC — Obligation to recover aid deemed illegal — Practical difficulties in calculating the precise amount of the aid to be recovered and the existence of an application brought against the decision of the Commission declaring the aid illegal have no impact on that obligation

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to give effect, within the prescribed period, to Commission Decision 2005/709/EC of 2 August 2004 on the State aid implemented by France for France Télécom, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2 and 3 of that decision, the fourth paragraph of Article 249 EC and Article 10 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to give effect, within the prescribed period, to Commission Decision 2005/709/EC of 2 August 2004 on the State aid implemented by France for France Télécom, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2 and 3 of that decision, the fourth paragraph of Article 249 EC and Article 10 EC;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 310, 16.12.2006.

1

---
Case No. 15,195.

#### UNITED STATES v. GEAR.

[3 McLean, 571.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Illinois.

June Term, 1847.

Trespass—Ore Lands—Permit—Rent Receipt.

1. A permit to enter od lands containing lead ore. may be shown in an action of trespass by the United States, not as a justification, but to show the nature and object of the entry.

2. A final receipt by an officer of the government. authorised to act in the premises, for rent, is a full discharge, being subsequent to the trespass alleged, although the officer may never have accounted for the money received.

At law.

Mr. Gregg, U. S. Dist. Atty.

Hardin & Campbell, for defendant.

1

 [Reported by Hon. John McLean, Circuit J ustice. ]

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This action was brought by the United States, for a trespass upon certain lands containing lead ore. The defendant [Hezekiah H. Gear] pleaded the general issue and notice, &c. [See 3 How. (44 U. S.) 120.] It was proved that defendant being in possession of certain mineral lands, had dug of lead ore about one hundred - thousand pounds, which contained from sixty to seventy per cent, of pure lead. The mineral was worth from fifteen to eighteen dollars per thousand pounds. The defendant offered in evidence a permit from an authorised officer of the government to enter upon the land, which was objected to, but the court admitted it as evidence, as it explained the nature and object of his entry, and showed that it was not tortious. He also offered in evidence a receipt of John Flannigan. agent for the lead mines, for four hundred dollars, in full for rent of lead mines, dated in 1841, subsequent to the trespass laid in the declaration. This receipt was objected to on the ground, that the *1272agent had never accounted for the money, hut the court admitted it as evidence, and instructed the jury that unless there was fraud in obtaining the receipt, or a mistake, of which there was no evidence, that it was a full discharge. That the money having been paid by the defendant to the authorised agent of the government, the payment was good, though tne agent may never have accounted for it Verdict, not guilty.
No. 56110.

protest 169800-K (New York).

#### American President Lines *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
# C_2008280EN.01000101.xml

| 4.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

3,75 % on 1 November 2008

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 November 2008

(2008/C 280/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2822 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4443 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79690 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8512 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4832 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 305,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4800 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,280 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 258,36 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,5593 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6870 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,400 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9718 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9102 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5340 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9376 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1836 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8891 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 623,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,5374 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7678 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1566 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 104,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5153 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,210 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5839 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,813 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8096 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3737 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2822

JPY

Japanese yen

126,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4443

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79690

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8512

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4832

ISK

Iceland króna

305,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4800

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,280

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

258,36

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

3,5593

RON

Romanian leu

3,6870

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,400

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9718

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9102

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5340

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9376

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1836

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8891

KRW

South Korean won

1 623,01

ZAR

South African rand

12,5374

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7678

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1566

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 104,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5153

PHP

Philippine peso

62,210

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5839

THB

Thai baht

44,813

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8096

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3737

---

(1)

1

Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

MICHELLE R. MATHIS,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00363

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

SAFETY, IMPOUND UNIT, MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH P. DEAVERS

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed March 28, 2013, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: March 28, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00363-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2008263EN.01000301.xml

| 16.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/3

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/137/08

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2008/C 263/03)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition EPSO/AD/137/08 for the recruitment of Italian-language lawyer-linguists (AD 7).

The competition notice is published in Official Journal C 263 A of 16.10.2008 in Italian only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://europa.eu/epso

---
February 28, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHARLOTTE CARIO BUSSEY, Appellant

NO. 14-10-00685-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0000098559
<NAME>                              TOKHEIM CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                           14,989
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   104,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                      5,366
<INVENTORY>                                      79,165<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                211,889
<PP&E>                                          154,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                   89,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  574,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           413,326
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            16,737<F3>
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        116,562<F4>
<OTHER-SE>                                     (219,951)<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    574,589
<SALES>                                         389,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                389,917
<CGS>                                           306,147<F6>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   306,147<F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                107,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               44,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (69,414)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (1,362)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (68,052)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (69,202)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (5.46)


</TABLE>
May 12, 1955

No. 59066.

Suit 4776.

#### D. N. & E. Walter & Co. *v.*United States.

A. R. D. 18 affirmed February 8, 1955. C. A. D. 582.
# Official Journal C 284/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 284 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4921 November 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 284

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4921 November 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2006/C 284/1 | Special Report No 9/2006 concerning translation expenditure incurred by the Commission, the Parliament and the Council together with the institutions’ replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Court of Auditors

2006/C 284/1

Special Report No 9/2006 concerning translation expenditure incurred by the Commission, the Parliament and the Council together with the institutions’ replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
March 28, 1951

No. 55410.

Suit 4634.

#### United States *v.*Coro, Inc.

C. D. 1189 affirmed February 6, 1951. C. A. D. 444.
Opinion issued April 11, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00269-CV

———————————

IN RE AYLEEN ESPARZA, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In April 2023, Relator Ayleen Esparza served her sworn responses to Real 

Party in Interest Johnson Fence and Masonry, LLC’s Requests for Admissions

denying certain requests. In February 2024, after deposing Relator, Real Party 

moved to sanction Relator for failure to admit “the truth of various matters . . . and 

[for] her abuse of the discovery process in resisting discovery.” Relator did not 

respond to the Motion for Sanctions or appear at the March 18, 2024 hearing on the 
2

motion.1 On March 18, 2024, the trial court signed an order granting the Motion for 

Sanctions, ordering Relator to pay $35,202.45 within fourteen days of the order, and 

noting that failure to pay by the due date would result in a penalty of $500 per day 

and the potential imposition of additional sanctions. The fourteen days expired on 

April 1, 2024. 

On April 8, 2024, Relator filed an Application for Writ of Mandamus 

requesting we direct the trial court to “vacate the award of sanctions” granted on 

March 18, 2024.

2

 Relator also filed an Emergency Motion requesting we stay the 

trial court’s order pending adjudication of her writ. The next day, Real Party filed a 

response opposing the application and request for emergency stay.

1

In its application, Relator states that no record was made of the March 18, 2024 

sanctions hearing. 

2 The underlying case is Johnson Fence and Masonry, LLC v. Stephen Anthony

Walsh, Teresita Tezeno a/k/a Teresita N. Valdez, JBlake Construction LLC, S.O.A. 

Construction Services, LLC, Amados Tractors Inc., Olver Amado Cureno-Nava, 

Fernando Ivan Cureno, Amado Cureno, Ayleen Estefania Esparza, Cause No. 2022-

75023, in the 11th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Kristen 

Hawkins presiding.
3

We deny Relator’s Application for Writ of Mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a); In re Perritt, 992 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tex. 1999) (“A party’s right to 

mandamus relief generally requires a predicate request for some action and a refusal 

of that request.”); In re Jindal Saw Ltd., 264 S.W.3d 755, 767 (Tex. App.—Houston

[1st Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding) (pet. granted) (holding that failure to advance 

arguments at trial level prevented relators from asserting such arguments on

mandamus); In re Bank of America, No. 01–02–00867–CV, 2003 WL 22310800, at 

*2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 9, 2003, orig. proceeding) (“[I]t would be

hard to conclude, without circumstances that were highly unusual or that made a trial

court’s ruling void, that a trial court could abuse its discretion in making a ruling for

a reason that was never presented to the court.”).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Countiss, and Rivas-Molloy.
(Reap. Dec. 9258)

#### Daiichi Bussan Kaisha, Ltd. *v.*United States

Entry No. 940980.

(Decided November 24, 1958)

*Myron Goldman*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Counsel for the respective parties, subject to approval of the Court, that at the time of the exportation of the Cotton Broadcloth Combination Ladies Skirts and Blouses, involved in the above reappraisement, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the Country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at U. S. $12.87 per dozen, net packed.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value for the said merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

> It is further stipulated that this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was United States $12.87 per dozen, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 43041.

#### Protest 711508-G of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

DallingeR, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstracts 30366, 30382, 30408, 32324, and 27043 the articles in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE00963.A01









THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# Official Journal L 343/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 343 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6428 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 343

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6428 September 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1722 of 18 June 2021 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the framework for cooperation and the exchange of information between competent authorities of the home and the host Member States in the context of supervision of payment institutions and electronic money institutions exercising cross-border provision of payment services (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1722 of 18 June 2021 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the framework for cooperation and the exchange of information between competent authorities of the home and the host Member States in the context of supervision of payment institutions and electronic money institutions exercising cross-border provision of payment services (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.