alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



                           Section 1350 Certifications

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
         TransNet Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify to such officer's
         knowledge that:

     1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period
         ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations
         of the Company.





     /s/ Steven J. Wilk
     -----------------------
     Steven J. Wilk
     Chief Executive Officer

     Date:  May 14, 2009


     /s/ John J. Wilk
     -----------------------
     John J. Wilk
     Chief Financial Officer

     Date:  May 14, 2009
# C_2008256EN.01001301.xml

| 9.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/13

---

Call for proposals under the 2009 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

(2008/C 256/08)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the 2009 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call. Call deadline and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website.

‘People’ Specific Programme:

| Call Title | Call Identifier |
| --- | --- |
| Reintegration grants | FP7-PEOPLE-2009-RG |

Call Title

Call Identifier

Reintegration grants

Reintegration grants

FP7-PEOPLE-2009-RG

This call for proposals relates to the 2009 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2008) 4483 of 22 August 2008.

Information on the modalities of the call, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
# C_2008110EN.01002701.xml

| 1.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/27

---

Call for proposals under the work programme of the Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Joint Programme

(2008/C 110/11)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the work programme of the Ambient Assisted Living Joint Programme.

Proposals are invited for the following call:

AAL-2008-1.

AAL-2008-1.

Call documentation including deadline and budget is given in the call text, which is published on the following website:

http://www.aal-europe.eu

---
# C_2007211EN.01003303.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/33

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 June 2007 — Drax Power and Others v Commission

(Case T-130/06) (1)

1

(Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Proposed amendment to national allocation plan - Refusal by the Commission - Inadmissibility)

(2007/C 211/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Drax Power Ltd (Selby, United Kingdom); Great Yarmouth Power Ltd (Swindon, United Kingdom); International Power plc (London, United Kingdom); Npower Cogen Ltd (Swindon); RWE Npower plc (Swindon); ScottishPower Generation Ltd (Glasgow, United Kingdom); and Scottish and Southern Energy plc (Perth, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Glick, QC, and M. Cook, Barrister)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by U. Wölker and X. Lewis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 426 final of 22 February 2006 concerning the proposed amendment to the national allocation plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by the United Kingdom in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicants are to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants are to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9330 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9330

   To provide for the issuance of a Prince Hall Commemorative Stamp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 9, 2024

Mr. Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the issuance of a Prince Hall Commemorative Stamp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Original Prince Hall Commemorative 
Stamp Act''.

SEC. 2. PRINCE HALL COMMEMORATIVE SEMIPOSTAL STAMP.

    (a) In General.--The United States Postal Service shall issue a 
semipostal stamp (hereinafter in this Act referred to as the ``Prince 
Hall Commemorative Stamp'') in accordance with this section.
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--The issuance and sale of the Prince Hall 
Commemorative Stamp shall be governed by the provisions of section 416 
of title 39, United States Code, and regulations issued under such 
section.
    (c) Disposition of Proceeds.--
            (1) In general.--All amounts becoming available from the 
        sale of the Prince Hall Commemorative Stamp (as determined 
        under section 416(d) of such title 39) shall be transferred to 
        the Department of Education, for purposes of making Federal 
        Pell Grants under section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 
        1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a), through payments which shall be made at 
        least twice a year.
            (2) Proceeds not to be offset.--In accordance with section 
        416(d)(4) of such title 39, amounts becoming available from the 
        sale of the Prince Hall Commemorative Stamp (as so determined) 
        shall not be taken into account in any decision relating to the 
        level of appropriations or other Federal funding to be 
        furnished in any year to the Department of Education.
    (d) Duration.--The Prince Hall Commemorative Stamp shall be made 
available to the public for during the two-year period beginning on 
January 1, 2025.
    (e) Definition.--For purposes of this Act, the term ``semipostal 
stamp'' refers to a stamp described in section 416(a)(1) of title 39, 
United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 7605.

Entry No. 9483.

— Invoice dated Burslem, England, April 5, 1939.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., May 11, 1939.

(Decided June 24, 1948)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

JOHNSON, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for home consumption plus, when not included in such price, the costs of all containers of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed, ready for shipment to the United States, is the appraised unit values less two and one-half *(2j4 %)*per cent discount.

*271IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that there is no higher export value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

■ On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised unit values, less per centum discount.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
---

Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Timmins Gold Corp. (the Company) is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form
40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report).

I, Darren Prins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906
of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Darren
PrinsName: Darren PrinsTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate:
March 25, 2015

---
California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield 

Section 

Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact 

Report/Environmental 

Impact Statement 

Appendix 3.7-C 

Watershed Evaluation Report Parts 1 

through 4 

November 2017 
Appendix 3.7-C 

Watershed Evaluation Report Parts 1 through 4 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank 
Appendix 3.7-C 

Watershed Evaluation Report Parts 1 through 4 

California High-Speed Rail Authority November 2017 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Page | 3.7-C-1 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

APPENDIX 3.7-C: WATERSHED EVALUATION REPORT PARTS 1 

THROUGH 4 

A number of technical appendices included as part of the Fresno to Bakersfield Section Final 

Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) have not been 

recreated for the purposes of this Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS because the information contained 

within the technical appendix would remain applicable to the F-B LGA. Appendix 3.7-C did not 

require an update for the F-B LGA analysis and therefore is not included in Volume II of the 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS. To review the appendix in its entirety, 

please refer to the Authority’s Final EIR/EIS: Fresno to Bakersfield website. 
Appendix 3.7-C 

Watershed Evaluation Report Parts 1 through 4 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

3.7-C-2 | Page Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank
No. 58178.

protests 133325-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Fan Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question consist of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays the same in all material respects as those involved in *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

| Name of entity and place of jurisdiction              |   | Voting SecuritiesOwned Percentage |       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|------------|
| PennantPark Floating Rate Funding I, LLC (Delaware)   |   | 100                               | %     |
| PennantPark CLO I, LLC (Delaware)                     |   | 100                               | %     |
| PennantPark CLO I, Ltd. (Cayman Islands)              |   | 100                               | %          |
| PennantPark CLO I Depositor, LLC (Delaware)           |   | 100                               | %     |
| PFLT Funding II, LLC (Delaware)                       |   | 100                               | %     |
| PFLT Investment Holdings, LLC (Delaware)              |   | 100                               | %          |
| GMC Television Broadcasting Holdings, Inc. (Delaware) |   | 100                               | % (1) |
| GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC (Delaware)           |   | 100                               | % (1) |
| Solutions Capital G.P., LLC (Delaware)                |   | 100                               | %     |
| Solutions Capital I, L.P. (Delaware)                  |   | 100                               | %     |

 

| (1) | The entity is directly owned by PFLT Funding II, LLC, which is wholly-owned by us. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

January 26, 2015

ERRATA 

______________________ 

Appeal No. 2014-1114

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., AND 

DAVID GOLDFARB, M.D., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

AND

C.R. BARD, INC.,

Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

v.

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: January 13, 2015

Precedential Opinion 

______________________ 

Please make the following correction: 

At page 12 line 25 of the dissenting opinion, the volume

number for the Delta-X case was omitted. The full cite is:

984 F.2d 410, 413 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50685 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JORGE LOPEZ-MUNOZ, also known as Netzahualcoyotl Lara, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-594-ALL-KC

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge Lopez-Munoz raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
September 25 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ANDRIUKAITIS

- WOODLANDS MEDICAL OF FICE, I, LLC; BARCUS WOODLANDS MEDICAL OF FICE I, LLC; BEHNKEN WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LLC; BEUTE L WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LLC; BOYER WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LL C; CRANE WOODLANDS MEDICAL OF FICE I, LLC; CHRISTE NSEN WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LL C; COMSTOCK WOODLAND S MEDICAL OFFICE I, LLC; DOWTY WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, L LC; DULING WOODLANDS MEDICAL OF FICE I, LLC; EDBERG WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LL C; HABERER WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LLC; HASHEK WOODLAND S MEDICAL OFFICE I, LLC; HILL WOODLANDS MEDICAL OF FICE I, LLC; HILL G & M WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LL C; KESSLER W OODLANDS MEDICAL OFF ICE I, LLC; KUHLMAN WOODLAN DS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LLC; LEASK WOODLANDS MEDICAL OF FICE I, LLC; LOVELAD Y WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LL C; OLSON WOODLANDS M EDICAL OFFICE I, LLC; ROHRBACHER WOOD LANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LLC; SKINNER WOODLANDS M EDICAL OFFICE I, LLC ; TIC WOODLANDS MEDI CAL,

LLC; TRASKIEWICZ WEB B WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LLC; URMOSSY WOODLANDS ME DICAL OFFICE I, LLC; Y. SUNWOODLANDS MEDICAL OF FICE I, LLC; AND H. CHEN WOODLANDS MEDICAL OFFICE I, LL C

, Appellants

NO. 14

- 13

- 00612

- CV V.

WOODLANDS

- NORTH HOUSTON HEART CENTER, PA , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Woodlands

North H ouston Heart Center, PA, signed June 21, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s, Andriukaitis

- Woodlands Medical Office, I, LLC; Barcus Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Behnken Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Beutel Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Boyer Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Crane Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Christensen Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Comstock Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Do wty Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Duling Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Edberg Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Haberer Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Hashek Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Hill Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Hill G & M Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Kessler Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Kuhlman Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Leask Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Lovelady Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Olson Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Rohrbacher Woodlands Medical O ffice I, LLC; Skinner Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; TIC Woodlands Medical, LLC; Traskiewicz Webb Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Urmossy Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; Y. Sun Woodlands Medical Office I, LLC; and H. Chen Woodlands Medical Office I, LL C , jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2007257EN.01005201.xml

| 30.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/52

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4779 — Akzo Nobel/ICI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 257/15)

| 1. | On 24 October 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Akzo Nobel N.V. (‘Akzo Nobel’, the Netherlands) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC (‘ICI’, United Kingdom) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 24 October 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Akzo Nobel N.V. (‘Akzo Nobel’, the Netherlands) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC (‘ICI’, United Kingdom) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | Akzo Nobel: healthcare products, coatings and chemicals, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

Akzo Nobel: healthcare products, coatings and chemicals,

| — | ICI: coatings, industrial adhesives, specialty starches and polymers and electronic materials. |
| --- | --- |

—

ICI: coatings, industrial adhesives, specialty starches and polymers and electronic materials.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4779 — Akzo Nobel/ICI, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4779 — Akzo Nobel/ICI, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2007246EN.01001001.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/10

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2007/C 246/05)

OJ C 191, 17.8.2007

OJ C 191, 17.8.2007

History of previous publications:

OJ C 181, 3.8.2007

OJ C 138, 22.6.2007

OJ C 126, 7.6.2007

OJ C 78, 11.4.2007

OJ C 332, 30.12.2006

OJ C 317, 23.12.2006

---
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of LED Lighting Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2016, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (a)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 21, 2017/s/ Kevin KearneyKevin Kearney,
Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer
No. 54187.

#### Dodge & Olcott, Inc., and Fritzsche Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 153987-K and 153955-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mandarin oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Fritzsche Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.