alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008299EN.01000801.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 November 2008

(2008/C 299/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2602 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,3 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4537 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,841 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,371 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5369 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 245 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,927 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,7 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,78 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8375 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,8035 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,404 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,118 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 2,0278 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6151 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,768 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3854 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9277 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 890,3 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1848 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6086 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1317 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 626,48 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5651 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,83 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6421 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,403 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0627 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6428 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2602

JPY

Japanese yen

119,3

DKK

Danish krone

7,4537

GBP

Pound sterling

0,841

SEK

Swedish krona

10,371

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5369

ISK

Iceland króna

245

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,927

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,7

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,78

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8375

RON

Romanian leu

3,8035

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,404

TRY

Turkish lira

2,118

AUD

Australian dollar

2,0278

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6151

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,768

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3854

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9277

KRW

South Korean won

1 890,3

ZAR

South African rand

13,1848

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6086

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1317

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 626,48

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5651

PHP

Philippine peso

62,83

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6421

THB

Thai baht

44,403

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0627

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6428

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 142 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States Trade Representative should bring a case before the World Trade Organization regarding 

the violations of intellectual property rights by the People’s Republic 

of China. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2005 

Mr. DORGAN (for himself and Mr. GRAHAM) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Finance 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States 

Trade Representative should bring a case before the 

World Trade Organization regarding the violations of 

intellectual property rights by the People’s Republic of 

China.

Whereas at the Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade 

(JCCT) meeting in April 2004, the People’s Republic of 

China committed to undertake a significant reduction of 

infringements on intellectual property rights; 

Whereas on April 29, 2005, the United States Trade Representative concluded that, ‘‘China has not resolved critical deficiencies in (intellectual property rights) protection 

and enforcement and, as a result, infringements remain 

at epidemic levels’’; 
2

•SRES 142 IS

Whereas the United States Trade Representative found that 

‘‘China’s inadequate intellectual property rights enforcement is resulting in infringement levels at 90 percent or 

above for virtually every form of intellectual property,’’; 

Whereas United States Trade Representative further concluded that ‘‘there has not been a significant reduction 

in (intellectual property rights) infringements throughout 

China,’’ notwithstanding China’s commitment in April 

2004 to achieve such a reduction; 

Whereas, according to the United States Chamber of Commerce, China’s violations of intellectual property rights 

are costing United States industry an estimated 

$200,000,000,000 per year; and 

Whereas the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) (described in section 

101(d)(15) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act) is intended to provide a mechanism for the enforcement of intellectual property rights: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the 

2 United States Trade Representative should immediately 

3 initiate a case against the People’s Republic of China 

4 through the World Trade Organization dispute settlement 

5 process.

Æ
**OFFICE OFTHE**  ATTORNEYGENERAL OFTEXAS **AUSTIN -cbManu**  **--**

Iionocsblc F. E. Utohall 

## county

**Attorney** Callahan County Baird, TexasHon. **F ’** 
**. E.**  HItQhell, **page 3** 

The oourts of Tsxae have held that rohool trustees era public oiflasrr of thir State. **See authoritie4**  **in,** atAnIon #a. b2.056, whloh Is enclossd.

This **depnrtmont** in opinion AJ. O-2066 ha;@ passed upon a very clmiler mcitter to the one cubmlttsd to you. In that opinion we h8ld that son001 trustee@are dlequalI~Ied,under hrtlelo 2940, from serving a6 electl.on Judges. In the enme oplalor, we hold, prInoIpolly basedupon the holdln ease of Cay18 vr Alexander, (Clr.App.1 75 S.W. d :;,“” that the prodsione of Article 2940 ware not aendatory lk+~ar lm &footIng the valldlty of an eleotlon unless the eleotlon oflloi8lo?-nftsmpted to exsroire influsnoson.6lcotore or aoted unfairly or:pr’rpetrated. eame fraud where,the puallfloatlons of a uJ0rity of the 414ot10n 0m0ttrs wers,not ah~n4ngbd. we ballire tk+ holUng Ln the oplnlon refrrred to Is **apdioablo to**  **your** propo8ltIon. A aopy of that OpInlon Is being btt@losed for your &srIrtanor and lnformation,'and~youare referrod to the authorltles thereln oltrd.

IOU am, thererorc,advissd that it ,iathe oplnfon of thlr doputment,. under the Snots rubmlttrdby you, that the ~ohool trueitee rleotlon in a oonsol,idctsd eohool dls~trlot Is not nildend TQld, &IIa matter oft law, **by** ~P4REOXl 0r the sl*otlon~offIsIalr likerise being sohool truoteee or **beoaueo** one of the 0filairl.r. ws a oandldate ier **r441,eotlon** for rob001 trurtsr **in** 

### the l

bsenae of smc proof that said eleotlon affloials ittempted to exeroiro soms,lnflu~nooover the 

### elaotoreor aoted~.unfalrly 

### or frnuQulently In perforalng the duties bp080a won them as rleotIon 0rfi0ia.

Us are unable to say', under thm ?~otr rubmltted by you, wtbrr or not'the elrotlon was ralld in all respbota or whether we do not pass upon althor of these
have fully anevered yoiarLnqulry.

Xaurc very truly ATTORREX

OEW.iUL OF TEXAS the l ame Is roldable and quortlonm.

We trucat that WC)

A8slrtant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 1 AND 2 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             959
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,497
<PP&E>                                         134,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,444
<BONDS>                                         18,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           303
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,616
<SALES>                                          3,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,357
<CGS>                                            2,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (30)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,444)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,444)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,444)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.59)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.F. Hughes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

The foregoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.

/s/ J.F. Hughes
    -----------------------------------
    Chairman of the Board,
    Chief Executive Officer
    and Director

    January 9, 2009
# Official Journal C 57I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 057I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6320 February 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 057I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6320 February 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 57 I/01 | Council Decision of 17 February 2020 appointing one member of the Management Board of the European Institute for Gender Equality for Germany | 1 |

Contents

page

Council

2020/C 57 I/01

Council Decision of 17 February 2020 appointing one member of the Management Board of the European Institute for Gender Equality for Germany

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 1 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 1

  Informing the President of the United States that a quorum of each 
                          House is assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2005

     Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Informing the President of the United States that a quorum of each 
                          House is assembled.

    Resolved, That a committee consisting of two Senators be appointed 
to join such committee as may be appointed by the House of 
Representatives to wait upon the President of the United States and 
inform him that a quorum of each House is assembled and that the 
Congress is ready to receive any communication he may be pleased to 
make.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

March 15,
2017
Via EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Annual Report of VOC Energy Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as
a separate disclosure document.



THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,Trustee for VOC Energy TrustBy

/s/ MICHAEL J. ULRICH Michael J. Ulrich Vice President


---



QuickLinks
APPENDIX A-1 

PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS 

SEGMENT 6 




STA 9620+00 TO STA 9750+00

VICTORVILLE TO LAS VEGAS

PLAN AND PROFILE

C-184A

2450

2400

2300

2250

2200

1950

2350

2450

2400

2300

2250

2200

1950

2350

SEGMENT 6, ALTERNATIVE A

DRAWING NO REV

Korve

Engineering

725 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 2350

LOS ANGELES, CA. 90017

0 0

DATE

+00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00 +00

PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL ALIGNMENT

HORIZ. SCALE VERT. SCALE

205062G0

DESERT PRESS X

PROFILE

PLAN

500’ 500’ 1000’ 50’ 50’ 100’

03-05-08

L = 1200’

L = 1400’
STA 9750+00 TO STA 9880+00

VICTORVILLE TO LAS VEGAS

PLAN AND PROFILE

C-185A

2450

2400

2300

2250

2200

2150

2350

2450

2400

2300

2250

2200

2150

2350

SEGMENT 6, ALTERNATIVE A

L = 1600’

L = 1400’

L = 800’

L = 1000’
VICTORVILLE TO LAS VEGAS

PLAN AND PROFILE

C-186A

STA 9880+00 TO STA 10020+52

2300

2250

2150

2100

2050

2000

2200

2300

2250

2150

2100

2050

2000

2200

GRADE = 0.00%

SEGMENT 6, ALTERNATIVE A

GRADE = 0.00%

L = 1000’ L = 1300’

L = 1300’



STA 9620+00 TO STA 9750+00

VICTORVILLE TO LAS VEGAS

PLAN AND PROFILE

C-184B

2450

2400

2300

2250

2200

1950

2350

2450

2400

2300

2250

2200

1950

2350

SEGMENT 6, ALTERNATIVE B

L = 1200’

L = 1200’
STA 9750+00 TO STA 9880+00

VICTORVILLE TO LAS VEGAS

PLAN AND PROFILE

C-185B

2450

2400

2300

2250

2200

2150

2350

2450

2400

2300

2250

2200

2150

2350

SEGMENT 6, ALTERNATIVE B

L = 1600’

L = 2000’ L = 1200’
VICTORVILLE TO LAS VEGAS

PLAN AND PROFILE

C-186B

STA 9880+00 TO STA 10019+00

2300

2250

2150

2100

2050

2000

2300

2250

2150

2100

2050

2000

2200

GRADE = 0.00%

SEGMENT 6, ALTERNATIVE B

2200 GRADE = 0.00%

L = 600’ L = 1300’

L = 1300’




L = 600’

C

9750+00 9800+00 9850+00

VICTORVILLE TO LAS VEGAS

PLAN AND PROFILE

C-187C

2350

2300

2250

2200

2150

2100

2050

2350

2300

2250

2200

2150

2100

2050

SEGMENT 6, ALTERNATIVE C

STA 10010+00 TO 10087+45

GRADE = 0.00%

L = 800’
ALTERNATIVES 2A AND 2B 

EXHIBITS

Appendix

B

B. Alternatives 2A and 2B Exhibits
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐1 

Exhibit B‐1. Preferred Alternative and Alternative 2B – Key Map
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐2 

Exhibit B‐1A. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐3 

Exhibit B‐1B. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐4 

Exhibit B‐1C. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐5 

Exhibit B‐1D. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐6 

Exhibit B‐1E. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐7 

Exhibit B‐1F. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐8 

Exhibit B‐1G. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐9 

Exhibit B‐1H. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐10 

Exhibit B‐1I. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐11 

Exhibit B‐1J. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐12 

Exhibit B‐1K. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐13 

Exhibit B‐1L. Preferred Alternative
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐14 

Exhibit B‐2A. Alternative 2B
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐15 

Exhibit B‐2B. Alternative 2B
Springfield Rail Improvements Project B‐16 

Exhibit B‐2C. Alternative 2B
(Reap. Dec. 9267)

#### D. J. Ambrosio *v.*United States

Entry No. 721544, etc.

(Decided December 9, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 9766)

#### Kussi & Feigl, Inc. Globe Shipping Co., Inc. v.United States

Entry No. 986209, etc.

*461(Decided August 10, 1960)

*Barnes, Richardson é Colburn*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliveh, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, that the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule “A”, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are limited to the items marked “A” and initialed MG (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner Max M. Greenberg (Examiner’s Name) and are abandoned in all other respects.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that as so limited, the issues are the same in all material respects to the issues involved in *Bert Friedberg & Company*v. *United States,*Reappt. Dec. 8590 and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the prices at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges' and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States were the appraised unit values less 15.35% plus 1.01%.

The cited case is authority for the proposition that a so-called French sole or unique tax is not part of statutory foreign value.

On the agreed facts, and consistent with the incorporated case on the matter of law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise, represented by the invoice items marked “A” and initialed “MG,” is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised unit values, less 15.35 per centum, plus 1.01 per centum.

As to all other merchandise, these appeals for reappraisement are dismissed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

NetJets, Inc., et al.,

Plaintiffs

 v.

IntelliJet Group, LLC,

Defendant

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:12-cv-00059

Judge Frost

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

Defendant IntelliJet Group, LLC’s February 25, 2013 motion to vacate the

mediation set for March 15, 2013 at 3:oo p.m. (doc. 28) is GRANTED. 

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the mediator,

Sandra Lynskey, 30 E. Broad St., 14th floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215.

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:12-cv-00059-GLF-NMK Doc #: 30 Filed: 02/26/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>