alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           | Summit Hotel OP, LP                                  |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | By: Summit Hotel GP, LLC, its general partner        |
|                           | By: Summit Hotel Properties, Inc., its sole member   |
|                           |                                                 |
| Date:  April 4, 2011 | By:   /s/  Daniel P. Hansen |
|                           | Daniel P. Hansen                                     |
|                           | President and Chief Executive Officer           |
|                           | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
By E -mail Robert Finamore, Acting Chief Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Room W86

-000 Washington, DC 20590 Your reference 

# 8 Lufthansa

Our reference/Date Telephone ext. November 7, 2014

RE : Application of Tyrolean Airways (Docket DOT-OST-2014-0186) Dear Mr. Finamore: On behalf of Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt GesrnBH, I have polled the representatives of all U . S
. carriers listed on the certificate of service attached to the Application of Tyrolean for a Statement of Authorization filed on November 3, 2014, in the above

-referenced docket. None of the U . S
. carrier representatives had any objection to the application. A separate email to Mr. Pommer of Atlas Air was circulated at your request as he was unintentionally left off the certificate, and he responded with no objection. A copy of this letter is being filed in the above

-referenced docket and served on all persons listed on the attached certificate of service.

cc: Service list

Lufthansa German Airlines 1640 Hempstead Turnpike East Meadow, N.Y. 11554 Telephone 516 296 9200 Telefax 516 296 9584 Respectfully submitted, 

# &;____ Robin McDougall Paralegal The Lufthansa Group

f'vkmlx:ror



### ~>



### V'~~ STAR ALLIANCEService List: msinick@ssd.com howard.kass@ aa.com robert.wirick@ aa. com sascha.vanderbellen @delta.com sametta.c.barnett@ delta. com chris. walker@delta.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com jcanny@ amerijet.com jhill@ cooley.com perkmann@cooley.com nssparks @fedex.com dan.weiss @united. com steve.morrissey@ united. com sllunsford@ fedex.com gbleopard @fedex.com russell.pommer@ atlasair.com jhfoglia@zsrlaw.com jyoung@yklaw.com dkirstein@ yklaw. com anita.mosner@hklaw .com jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com matwood@ cozen.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com john. s.duncan @faa.gov dwight.moore@transcom.mil englets@ state. gov
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**Certification ofChief Financial Officerof Tipperary Corporation  Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350**

 

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/A of Tipperary Corporation (the “*Company*”) forthe period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “*Report*”), I,Joseph B. Feiten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   | /s/ Joseph B. Feiten    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Joseph B. Feiten        |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  | December 10, 2004       |
|        |        |                         |        |  |

 

----
Steven L. Beshear Governor

Ms. Gwen Keyes-Fleming Regional Administrator 

# 0

Leonard K
. Peters Secretary

# i))~.o**~**

# ·,~~~
.!0**"'~-(;:.** Commonwealth ofKentucky 

### 4,.o**·,1'~ ~.t**  Energy and Environment Cabinet 

## -;ptJ

## :.;>~{ft. Capital Plaza Tower :,o**~-** 

### P .'V:**r~~** 500 Mero Street, 12'h Floor

## -1~~~·~..**v~~** Frankfort, Kentucky40601**·~..?>.0- "** **~ ~** 

Phone: (502) 564-7192 

### 1**Q..~~ ~"'** 

Fax: (502) 564-7484 '1**~** '

March 22, 2011

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 Dear Ms. Fleming, On November 19, 2010, the Kentucky Division for Air Quality received a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal package from the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District. The package included SIP requests for eight regulations. Specific requirements are as follows:1. Regulation 1.02, Definitions

- Submit for approval into the SIP. 2. Regulation 1.06, Stationary Source Self-Monitoring, Emissions Inventory Development, andReporting

- Submit for approval into the SIP. 3. Regulation 1.07, Emissions DuringStartups, Shutdowns, Malfunctions, and Emergencies

- Submit for approval into the SIP. 4. Regulation 3.01,AmbientAir Quality Standards, fonnerly, Purpose of Standards and Expression of Non-Degradation Intention

- Submit for approval into the SIP. 5. Regulation 3.02,Applicability of AmbientAir Quality Standards

- Remove the existing version from the SIP. 6. Regulation 3.03, Definitions

- Remove the existing version from the SIP. 7. Regulation 3.04,AmbientAir Quality Standards

- Remove the existing version from the SIP. 8. Regulation 3.05, Methods of Measurement

- Remove the existing version from the SIP. The Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet (Cabinet) hereby requests that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) approve the enclosed regulatory amendments as a revision to the Jefferson County portion ofthe Kentucky SIP.

# 0

Ms. Gwen Keyes-Fleming March 22. 2011 Page 2 

# 0

Included in the administratively complete SIP submittal package are documentation of public comment periods and public hearings that were held in regard to these SIP revisions. Additionally, pursuant to 40 CFR 51.103(a), two hard copies and a disc containing all documents are included. The Cabinet appreciates your prompt response to this request. If you have any further questions or concerns regarding this submittal, please contact Kelley Herbert at (502) 564-3999, ext. 4431 or by e-mail at kelley.herbert@ky.gov.

Cc: Dick Schutt Lynorae Benjamin LKP/kh Enclosures

KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com Sincerely, 

# w;
Leonard K. Peters Secretary

An Equnl Opportunity Employer M/F/0
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of TransTechnology Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 26, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 31, 2005                   Robert L.G. White
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert L.G. White,
                                        President & Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 31 2005                    Joseph F. Spanier
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joseph F. Spanier,
                                        Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

CARSON BRILL,1

 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

BIONCA LANG, 

Petitioner Below, 

 Appellee. 

§ 

§ No. 43, 2021 

§ 

§ Court Below—Family Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ File No. CS08-02892 

§ Petition No. 19-10019 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: June 25, 2021 

 Decided: August 10, 2021 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES,

Justices. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of the opening brief and the record on appeal, it appears 

to the Court that: 

(1) The appellant (“Father”) filed this appeal from the Family Court’s 

order, dated January 11, 2021, that granted sole legal custody and physical 

placement of the parties’ child to the appellee (“Mother”), with visitation between 

the child and Father to occur as agreed by the parties. On appeal, Father contends 

that the Family Court lacks authority to award sole legal custody to one parent 

1

 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d). 
2

without the consent of the other parent and that the Family Court’s order granting 

sole legal custody to Mother violated Father’s due process rights. 

(2) The Delaware General Assembly has vested the Family Court with 

jurisdiction to decide a petition for custody of a child.2 Title 13, Section 721(e) of 

the Delaware Code provides that a custody proceeding between parents shall be 

determined in accordance with the best interests of the child, as set forth in 13 Del. 

C. § 722. The law does not require that one parent consent in order for the Family 

Court to grant sole legal custody to the other parent, and Father’s reliance on Troxel 

v. Granville3 is misplaced.4

(3) Finally, to the extent that Father claims that the Family Court erred in 

connection with the hearing itself, Father has not provided a transcript of the Family 

Court proceedings. The record provided to this Court in an appeal must include a 

transcript of all evidence relevant to the challenged finding or conclusion.5 As the 

appellant, Father had the burden of submitting a transcript of the hearing to support 

his claims.6 He declined to do so, and therefore there is no basis on which to accept 

his conclusory claims of error. 

2

 10 Del. C. § 921(3). 

3

 530 U.S. 57 (2000). 

4 Cf. Smith v. Guest, 16 A.3d 920, 930-31 (Del. 2011) (distinguishing Troxel, which involved a 

petition by a nonparent third party for visitation, from a custody dispute between two people with 

coequal parental interests). 

5 Hunter v. Gamble, 2018 WL 6505988 (Del. Dec. 10, 2018). See also DEL. SUPR. CT. R. 9(e)(ii), 

14(e). 

6 Hunter, 2018 WL 6505988, at *2. 
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
# C_2008270EN.01001602.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5321 — LAHC/Barclays Life)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 270/06)

On 15 October 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5321. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5321. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# C_2008256EN.01001201.xml

| 9.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/12

---

Prolongation of the schemes relating to support to audiovisual productions and to support for film production companies until 1 January 2009

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure

(2008/C 256/07)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 2 July 2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Case number | 64 823 |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Prolongation of the schemes relating to support to audiovisual productions and to support for film production companies until 1 January 2009 |
| Legal basis | Regulation of 28 July 2005 on support to audiovisual productions and Regulation No 1017 of 18 September 2002 on film support to production companies |
| Type of measure | Grants |
| Objective | Promote culture |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | The overall budget of the scheme relating to support to audiovisual productions is of approximately NOK 290 million per year.
  For the scheme on support to film production companies, funds are allocated through the general transfer to the Norwegian Film Fund |
| Duration | Until 1 January 2009 |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

2 July 2008

Case number

Case number

64 823

EFTA State

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Prolongation of the schemes relating to support to audiovisual productions and to support for film production companies until 1 January 2009

Legal basis

Legal basis

Regulation of 28 July 2005 on support to audiovisual productions and Regulation No 1017 of 18 September 2002 on film support to production companies

Type of measure

Type of measure

Grants

Objective

Objective

Promote culture

Form of aid

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

Budget

The overall budget of the scheme relating to support to audiovisual productions is of approximately NOK 290 million per year.

For the scheme on support to film production companies, funds are allocated through the general transfer to the Norwegian Film Fund

Duration

Duration

Until 1 January 2009

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority's website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
Telephonic Public Hearing on 

Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail

Overview and Participant Instructions

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) will hold a telephonic public hearing on April 30, 2020, on 

FRA’s proposed Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service. This hearing will

provide members of the public an opportunity to deliver oral comments on the proposal telephonically, 

instead of in person. 

As a reminder, any person wishing to make a comment at the hearing should notify Katie List at 

katie.list@dot.gov or (202) 493-0530 by Thursday, April 23, 2020. Please see the hearing website for 

more details about information to be provided. Advance notification will allow FRA to anticipate the 

number of commenters and whether to impose time limits for comments. 

If you would like to provide written comments on the proposed rule, you may do so at any time via the 

docket for the proposed rule. The comment period ends on June 1, 2020.

Telephonic Public Hearing Date and Time

April 30, 2020, from 1:00pm to 4:00pm ET

Participant Access Information

You may attend the hearing by calling into a conference line, and entering an access code.

Toll-free: 877-692-8957

Local: 234-720-6980

Access Code: 1552802

Telephonic Public Hearing Process

• Technology: The public hearing will take place using a moderated telephone conference system. 

There will not be an online component; it will be held entirely over the phone. 

• Comments: When participants call into the phone line, they will be automatically muted. 

Following opening remarks from FRA moderators, the operator will give verbal instructions on 

how to give a comment. These instructions will be repeated several times during the call. 

o Participants who wish to make a comment will follow the operator’s instructions to 

enter a command on their telephone keypad. After they enter the command, they will 

be placed in line on a first come, first served basis. 

o When it is their turn to speak, the commenter will receive instructions that their line is 

open and they can provide their comment. 

• Assistance: For assistance during the call, press * then 0. 

• Supplementary materials: Some commenters have indicated they may provide supplementary 

materials (slides or documents) with their comments. FRA will post the materials to the docket 

for the proposed rule by April 29, 2020.

FRA will post the transcript of the public hearing, including written comments submitted, to the docket 

shortly after the hearing.
10

10

10

10

10

10

10

G

U

L

F

O

F

M

E

X

I

C

O

Potrero

Cortado

OE E

Potrero

Cortado

Potrero

Lopeno

NW OE E

Potrero

Lopeno SW

Potrero

Lopeno NW

Potrero

Lopeno SE

FEET

FEET

1 360 000 FEET

97°15'

00'

30"

20'

30"

30"

26°

27°00'

97° 20'

17'

30"

17'

97°

15'

52'

30"

26°

27°

22'

22' 97°

52'

30"

30" 57'30"

55'

57'

55'

16 890 000

1 390 000 FEET

16 850 000

E

29

29

29

29

000m

6 6

29

6 6

29

29

29

6

29

6

29

29

29

6

29

29

6

29

29

29

29

29

29

6

29

29

29

6 6

29

29

000m

29

6 6 6 6 6

6

000m 6 6 6 6 6

000m

6

87

67

84

69

77

78

65 68 71

79

85

87

74

77

81

75

80

N

83

62 72

85

79

78

N

76

80

70

76

84

63

82

66

74

82

86

81

86

64

66 71

73

62 E 63 64 65 67 68 69 70 72

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2697-434

POTRERO LOPENO NW OE E, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

POTRERO LOPENO NW OE E QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2009

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 46 ́

14 MILS

4° 34 ́

81 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

PQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
Case: 2:12-cv-00126-EAS-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 1 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00126-EAS-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 2 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00126-EAS-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 3 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00126-EAS-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 4 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00126-EAS-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 5 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00126-EAS-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 6 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00126-EAS-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 7 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T16:06:19-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 48024.

#### Protests 28785-K, etc., of Half Moon Mfg. & Trading Co., Inc. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of peat moss of the same character as that passed upon in *Half Moon Manufacturing & Trading Co.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 37, C. D. 656). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was therefore sustained as to certain of the merchandise.
# C_2008203EN.01000402.xml

| 9.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5198 — Ramius/Morgan Stanley/PDT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 203/03)

On 29 July 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5198. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5198. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---