alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10239)

#### Standard Brands Paint Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. DE-22173, etc.

(Decided May 7, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Edward, N. Glad*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*William E. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(James F. O’Mara,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

On call of these cases at the term of court in Los Angeles on February 2, .1962, counsel stipulated, in open court, that the merchandise covered by the entries in the appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part to this decision, was entered after February 27, 1958, and was not on the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521, under section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, T.D. 54165. The cases were then submitted on a further written stipulation of counsel for the parties, which was filed of record, as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are limited to the merchandise shipped by Hasegawa Shoten Co. of Japan.

> 2. That the said merchandise was appraised under Section 402(b) of the Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, 2nd Session.

> 3. That at the time of exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, were the unit invoiced values net packed.

Accepting these two stipulations as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, *supra,*is the proper basis for determination of the values of the merchandise shipped by Hasegawa Shoten Co. of Japan, described in the invoices covered by the entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values of the respective items of merchandise are the unit invoice values, net packed, .as shown on the invoices which are included in the official papers filed with the court in the several suits.

*639As to all other merchandise, these appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
NUMBER 13-08-00506-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

THOMAS N. LEECH, Appellant,

v.

AM-MEX PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL., Appellees.

On appeal from the 275th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This case is before the Court on a joint motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment

without reference to the merits, and to remand to the trial court to enter agreed dismissal.

The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the disposition of the matters

currently on appeal. Pursuant to the agreement, the parties request this Court to set aside

the trial court’s judgment without regards to the merits, and remand this case to the trial
2

court for entry of an agreed order of dismissal in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

The joint motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment and remand is GRANTED.

Accordingly, we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and

REMAND this case to the trial court for entry of an agreed order of dismissal in accordance

with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). In accordance with the

agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(d).

The parties also ask that mandate issue immediately. Rule of Appellate Procedure

18.1(c) authorizes the early issuance of mandate on the motion of the parties. Tex. R. App.

P. 18.1(c). We GRANT the joint motion and issue the mandate concurrently with our

opinion and judgment. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

25th day of March, 2010.
Case: 2:12-cv-00231-EAS-EPD Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/13/12 Page: 1 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00231-EAS-EPD Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/13/12 Page: 2 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00231-EAS-EPD Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/13/12 Page: 3 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00231-EAS-EPD Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/13/12 Page: 4 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00231-EAS-EPD Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/13/12 Page: 5 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T10:19:08-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Board of Directors

SodaStream International Ltd:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (No. 333-170299, No. 333-190655, 333-195578 and 333-208811) on Form S-8 of SodaStream International Ltd. of our reportdated March 9, 2017, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of SodaStream International Ltd. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2015 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, which report appears in the annual report on Form 20-F of SodaStreamInternational Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

/s/ Somekh Chaikin

Somekh Chaikin

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

A Member Firm of KPMG International

Tel Aviv, Israel

March 9, 2017
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Tianwen Liu, Chief Executive Officer of iSoftStone Holdings Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date: April 27, 2012



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Tianwen Liu        
|Name:  |  | Tianwen Liu            
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
IIA 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 9 

Providing for the appointment of Robert P. Kogod as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2005 

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself, Mr. FRIST, and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Robert P. Kogod as a 

citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution (in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress) occurring because of the expiration 

7 of the term of Wesley S. Williams, Jr., of Washington, 

8 D.C., on April 13, 2005, is filled by the appointment of 

9 Robert P. Kogod of Washington, D.C., for a term of 6 
2 

•SJ 9 IS

1 years, beginning on the later of April 13, 2005, or the 

2 date on which this resolution becomes law. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
unaudited financial statements contained in the Company's Form 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                               14,224,216
<SECURITIES>                         1,648,792 
<RECEIVABLES>                        67,785
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     15,940,793
<PP&E>                               977,115
<DEPRECIATION>                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       23,609,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                3,205,120
<BONDS>                              0
<COMMON>                             471,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                           17,288,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         23,609,566
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     6,435,482
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        909,905 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      5,515,421
<INCOME-TAX>                         2,230,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  3,285,421
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0 
<CHANGES>                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                         3,285,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .35
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION of CEO PURSUANT TO  Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the "Report") of FS Energy and Power Fund
(the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael C. Forman, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:





Dated: March 7, 2018/s/ MICHAEL C. FORMAN Michael C. Forman
Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9065 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9065

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include room air 
 conditioners as qualified energy property for purposes of the energy 
                   efficient home improvement credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2024

 Mr. Gallego introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include room air 
 conditioners as qualified energy property for purposes of the energy 
                   efficient home improvement credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROOM AIR CONDITIONERS AS QUALIFIED ENERGY PROPERTY FOR 
              PURPOSES OF THE ENERGY EFFICIENT HOME IMPROVEMENT CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 25C(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
                    ``(E) Any room air conditioner that meets the 
                Energy Star Most Efficient criteria.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Cause No. 01–12-00652-CR; Jowel Singleton v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 412th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 66948

The Brazoria County District Clerk, or the court reporter if the exhibit is still in his or her 

possession, is directed to send the original of State’s exhibit number 1, a DVD, to this Court. 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to cooperate with the district clerk and/or the court reporter to 

provide for the safekeeping, transportation, and return of such exhibit. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.6(g)(2).

The exhibit is due in this Court no later than February 20, 2013.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

  Acting individually ☐ Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ______________________________________________________

Date: February 8, 2013

Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for 

motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Note: Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice 

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion 

for rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.4(a).
2010

ACCIDENT PREDICTION AND RESOURCE

ALLOCATION PROCEDURE NORMALIZING CONSTANTS

The U.S. DOT Highway-Rail Crossing Resource Allocation Procedure, as described in the RailHighway Crossing Resource Allocation Procedure User’s Guide, Third Edition, August 1987,

DOT/FRA/OS-87/10, uses three “normalizing constants” in the accident prediction formula, Formula

A, Section 3.2.4, Page 17. These constants need to be periodically adjusted in order to keep the

procedure matched with the current accident trends, the current number of open crossings, and the

changes in the warning devices. 

The process for determining the three (3) new “normalizing constants” for 2010 is performed by 

making the sum of the calculated accident prediction values for all currently open public at-grade

crossings for Calendar Years 2004-2008, as of May 2010, be equal to the sum of the observed number

of 2009 accidents that occurred at the same crossings. This process is performed for each of the

respective three formulae for the three types of warning device categories, (1) passive, (2) flashing

lights, and (3) gates. This process normalizes the calculated prediction for the current trend in accident

data (which is downward) for each of the three types of warning device categories, and adjusts for the

current total number of open crossings (which is downward) and the accidents occurring at them, and

any changes in the number of warning devices at the crossings currently open.

The observed accidents result from those records in the accident data file that exist for only those

crossings that are currently open. This means that the number of observed accidents for these public atgrade crossings will not be equal to the actual number of accidents that are reported for a specific year. 

 While mismatched data records caused by inaccurate accident/inventory reporting are included, those

accidents which occurred prior to the date of a warning device change are excluded, as well as any

closed crossings. 

The new constants were determined for the national model using all open public crossings in the

National Inventory File as of May 2010. Those using the DOT Model should update their models by

replacing the old constants with the new recalculated values. The “normalizing constants” are located

in the computer program ACPD.NEW as shown in the User’s Guide Third Edition at the top of

Page A-4, Appendix A1 and in RESAL.NEW on Page B-3, Appendix B1.

As of August 2010, these new constants will be in the 2010 PCAPS Computer Program and Internet

versions of WBAPS located on the FRA Website at http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/. The table below lists

the new and recent prior year constants.

ACCIDENT PREDICTION AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION

PROCEDURE NORMALIZING CONSTANTS

WARNING

DEVICE

NEW PRIOR YEAR CONSTANTS

GROUPS 2010 2007 2005 2003 1998 1992 1990 1988 1986

(1) Passive .4613 .6768 .6407 .6500 .7159 .8239 .9417 .8778 .8644

(2) Flashing Lights .2918 .4605 .5233 .5001 .5292 .6935 .8345 .8013 .8887

(3) Gates .4614 .6039 .6513 .5725 .4921 .6714 .8901 .8911 .8131
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Petty, Chafin and Senior Judge Annunziata

SUZANNE COFFMAN MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1759-14-3 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 24, 2015 VIRGINIA MENNONITE RETI REMENT COMMUNITY AND WAUSAU BUSINESS INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKER S’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Michael L. Ritchie; Ritchie Law Firm, P.L.C., on brief), for appellant. (Emily O. Sealy; Midkiff, Mu ncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for appellees.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication. Suzanne Coffman (claimant) appeals a September 4, 2014 decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission affirming a de puty commissioner’s opinion. The deputy commission found that claimant failed to pr ove her leg symptoms were a compensable consequence of her July 31, 2008 industrial acci dent. Claimant contends the commission (1) “incorrectly applied the ‘r easonable probability’ evidentiary standard in ruling that” her condition was not a compensable consequence of he r original injury and (2) “erred when it found that [she] did not carry her burde n to prove that her bilateral le g injuries were a compensable consequence of her July 31, 2008 work-related back injury.”

We have reviewed the record and the commi ssion’s opinion and find th at this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for th e reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Coffman v. Virginia Mennon ite Found., JCN 2415958 (Sept. 4, 2014). WeUNPUBLISHED- 2 - dispense with oral argument and summarily affi rm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th e Court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.
July 19, 1971

No. 71-30

#### Larry C. Dusch, Jr., CADET THIRD CLASS, U. S. Air Force Academy, Colorado v BRIG GEN Walter T. Galligan, USAF, Commandant of Cadets, USAF Academy, Colorado and LT GEN A. P. Clark, USAF, Superintendent, USAF Academy, Colorado.

On consideration of the Petition for Temporary Restraining Order filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that no action by the convening authority referred to therein tends to deprive this Court of its jurisdiction ultimately to review petitioner’s case, or upon review, to grant meaningful relief should such relief appear warranted and it further appearing that petitioner may obtain a continuance of his trial of sufficient duration to permit the ap*666propriate authorities to act upon his “Application for Redress of Grievance” by motion addressed to the military judge, it is, by the Court, this 19th day of July 1971,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby dismissed, 28 USC § 1651 (a); United States v Best, 6 USCMA 39, 19 CMR 165 (1955).
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael C. Forman,certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form10-K of FS Energy and Power Fund; and 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: April 29, 2022
/s/ MICHAEL C. FORMAN
**Michael C. Forman****Chief Executive Officer**
 
**
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Air Force systems command talent and teamwork our strength acquisition excellence, our norm

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Air Force systems command talent and teamwork our strength acquisition excellence, our norm 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Acquisition excellence, our norm 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 46 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  021322150.jpg; 021322150.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -