alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 271-8897, the US Postal Service information hotline

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 271-8897, the US Postal Service information hotline 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Postal Service 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  192 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019883116.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 15





Board of Directors


Texas Industries, Inc.





We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment Number 9 to Registration Statement Number 2-48986 on Form
S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-53715 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Number 333-11604 on Form S-8 of Texas Industries, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated December 19, 2002 relating to the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements of Texas Industries, Inc. which are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2002.





Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.





/s/    Ernst & Young LLP





December 30, 2002


Dallas, Texas
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Pamela S. King, :

Plaintiff : Civil Action 2:12-cv-00165

v. : Judge Frost

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner 

of Social Security, : Magistrate Judge Abel

Defendant :

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's September 25, 2012

Report and Recommendation that this case be remanded to the Commissioner. No

objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having

reviewed the record de novo, adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B),

the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. 

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

Gregory L. Frost

United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cv-00165-GLF-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 11/08/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**Exhibit No. 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18            U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In            connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the            “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed            with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the            “Report”), David M. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Trust,            certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted            pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies            with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;            and

(2)       The information contained            in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and            results of operations of the Trust.

 

|                   | TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | (Registrant)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Date: November 8, 2007 | By:      /s/ David M.                            Peterson                                        |
|                   | David M. Peterson, Assistant General Agent

and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 158 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 158

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should designate 
the week beginning September 11, 2005, as ``National Historically Black 
                   Colleges and Universities Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2005

Mr. Graham (for himself, Mr. Allard, Mr. Allen, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Bunning, 
  Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Cochran, Mr. DeMint, Mr. DeWine, Mrs. Dole, Mr. 
Dodd, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Kerry, Ms. Landrieu, 
 Mr. Lott, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Specter, Mr. 
Talent, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Obama, Mr. Burr, 
 Mr. Salazar, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Biden, Mr. Alexander, and Mr. Martinez) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                             July 27, 2005

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should designate 
the week beginning September 11, 2005, as ``National Historically Black 
                   Colleges and Universities Week''.

Whereas there are 105 historically Black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities provide the quality 
        education essential to full participation in a complex, highly 
        technological society;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and 
        have played a prominent role in the history of the United States;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have allowed many 
        underprivileged students to attain their full potential through higher 
        education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically Black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND 
              UNIVERSITIES WEEK.

    (a) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the 
President should designate the week beginning September 11, 2005, as 
``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.
    (b) Proclamation.--The Senate requests the President to issue a 
proclamation--
            (1) designating the week beginning September 11, 2005, as 
        ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''; 
        and
            (2) calling on the people of the United States and 
        interested groups to observe the week with appropriate 
        ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate support for 
        historically Black colleges and universities in the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 11.1

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

The following information sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net increase in net assets per share resulting from operations for
the year ended December 31, 2015:



|                                                                    |  |   |            | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- | 
|Numerator for increase in net assets per share  basic and diluted: |  | $ | 1,047      | 
|Denominator for basic weighted average shares:                      |  |   | 11,533,315 | 
|Earnings per share  basic and diluted:                             |  | $ | 0.09       |
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.F. Hughes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.

/s/ J.F. Hughes
   ---------------------------------------
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
January 6, 2004
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00132-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-006884-1

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

SAMANTHA P. BLAIR, Appellant

V.

VICTORIA HUTCHISON, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Samantha P. Blair attempts to appeal from the trial court’s “Order Granting 

Motion for Reinstatement.” See Tex. R. Civ. P. 165a(3).

We have jurisdiction over appeals from final judgments and from certain

interlocutory orders made appealable by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 

39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When, as here, an order does not dispose of all 

pending parties and claims, the order is interlocutory, and unless a statutory exception 

applies, the order is unappealable until the trial court signs a final judgment. See Bally 

Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at

195; Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. 

proceeding). “No statute permits an appeal of an interlocutory order granting a 

motion to reinstate under Rule 165a(3).” Marvin v. Schneider, No. 14-20-00338-CV, 

2020 WL 5552809, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 17, 2020, no pet.)

(per curiam) (mem. op.); see Hale v. Mothershed, 715 S.W.2d 134, 135 (Tex. App.—

Texarkana 1986, no writ).

We notified Blair of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal 

because the order did not appear to be a final judgment or appealable order. We 

informed her that unless she or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a 

response within ten days showing grounds for continuing the appeal, we would 

dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. We have received 

no response.
3

Because the trial court’s “Order Granting Motion for Reinstatement” is neither 

a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss the appeal.1 See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr

Elizabeth Kerr

Justice

Delivered: June 24, 2021

1

Blair might be able to challenge the reinstatement order through other 

avenues. See, e.g., Estate of Howley v. Haberman, 878 S.W.2d 139, 140 (Tex. 1994) (orig. 

proceeding); Mem’l Hosp. of Galveston Cty. v. Gillis, 741 S.W.2d 364, 365–66 (Tex. 1987);

In re Gen. Motors Corp., 296 S.W.3d 813, 829–30 (Tex. App.—Austin 2009, orig. 

proceeding); S. Main Bank v. Wittig, 909 S.W.2d 243, 244 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th

Dist.] 1995, orig. proceeding); cf. Ingram v. Ingram, No. 02-14-00063-CV, 2014 WL

1510049, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr. 17, 2014, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. 

op.).
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended Sept. 30, 2011 of VB Clothing, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Anthony PasqualeAnthony PasqualeChief Executive Officer/s/ Anthony PasqualeAnthony PasqualeChief Financial OfficerDated: April 23, 2012   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to VB Clothing, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Donna Miller, :

Plaintiff, :

v. : Case No. 2:11-cv-438

New Salem Baptist Church, : JUDGE JAMES L. GRAHAM

et al., Magistrate Judge Kemp

Defendants. :

 

 ORDER

 This case is before the Court to consider a Report and

Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on August 12, 2011. 

No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. 

Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. This

case is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e) for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: September 6, 2011 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cv-00438-JLG-TPK Doc #: 5 Filed: 09/06/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 71 (Friday, April 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7029]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10849]


Washington Disaster <greek-i> WA-00012 Declaration of Economic 
Injury

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Washington, dated 04/09/2007.
    Incident: Windstorm.
    Incident Period: 12/14/2006 through 12/15/2006.

Effective Date: 04/09/2007.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/09/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: King, Lewis, San Juan
Contiguous Counties:
    Washington: Chelan, Cowlitz, Grays Harbor, Kitsap, Kittitas, 
Pacific, Pierce, Skamania, Snohomish, Thurston, Wahkiakum, Yakima

    The Interest Rate is: 4.000.
    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 108490.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> is 
Washington.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    Dated: April 9, 2007.
Steven C. Preston,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-7029 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0398. PHILIP H. WEENER v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST

COMPANY.

In this garnishment action, Plaintiff/Appellee Branch Banking and Trust

Company (“the Bank”) sought to collect a debt owed by Philip H. Weener by

garnishing assets of his company, Philip H. Weener, P. C. (“Weener’s company”).

Weener’s company filed four answersto the garnishment petition, and the Bank filed

traverses of the first, third, and fourth answers. Weener filed a claim pursuant to

OCGA § 18-4-15 seeking a ruling as to the existence of a lien superior to the Bank’s

judgment lien. After a hearing in which the trial court considered only Weener’s

claim regarding the superior lien and not the traverses, the court denied Weener’s

claim. The order also expressly stated that the hearing on the Bank’straverses would

occur at a later date. Weener filed this application for discretionary appeal, seeking

review of the trial court’s order. We lack jurisdiction.

The order that Weener seeks to appeal is not a final order. It is clear from the

trial court’s order that the Bank’straversesremain pending below. In casesinvolving

multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims

or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment. See

Shoenthal v. Shoenthal, 333 Ga. App. 729, 729 (776 SE2d 663) (2015) (punctuation

omitted). “In such circumstances, there must be an express determination under

OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or there must be compliance with the interlocutory appeal

requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Where neither of these code sections [is]

followed, the appeal is premature and must be dismissed.” Id. The order in this case

did not direct the entry of judgment pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-54 (b). Thus, Weener

May 08, 2017
was required to comply with interlocutory application procedures by obtaining a

timely certificate of immediate review before filing an application. Although appeals

in garnishment cases are typically by discretionary application, see OCGA § 5-6-35

(a) (4), “the discretionary-application statute, OCGA § 5-6-35, does not allow a party

to ignore the interlocutory-application subsection, OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), when

attempting to obtain appellate review” of an interlocutory order. See Scruggs v. Ga.

Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 588 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991). Because

Weener did not comply with interlocutory application procedures, this application is

hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/08/2017
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT of TRAVIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 26th day of

February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Greg Abbott, Attorney General of

Texas, Appellant,

v.

City of Liberty, Texas Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-13-00614-CV (Tr.Ct.No. D-1-GV-12-000040)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERED. Costs of the

appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 18th day of May, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK