alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000097432
<NAME> TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0        
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,900
<PP&E>                                       3,324,100 
<DEPRECIATION>                                 833,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,267,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          367,800
<BONDS>                                      1,204,400
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,700,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,267,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,900 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,000 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,000 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not meaningful since Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation is a
wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 18, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1381 Lower Tribunal No. F91-36905A

________________ 

### George Manuel, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge. Robyn M. Blake, P.A., and Robyn Blake, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Beiro v. State, 289 So. 3d 511, 511-12 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (observing: “The mere incantation of the words ‘manifest injustice’ does not make it so. Beiro has failed to allege any facts—nor can he—to justify invoking the extremely limited concept of manifest injustice to excuse a procedural bar and allow us to review the merits of his instant claim . . . . There is little doubt that every defendant believes they will suffer a ‘manifest injustice’ if their postconviction claim is deemed foreclosed by the passage of time. However, a defendant does not have an unlimited right to continue to litigate (and relitigate) the validity of their conviction, and such a limited right must be balanced against the State's competing and substantial interest in the finality of judgments in criminal cases.”)
```

[104th Congress Public Law 249]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ249.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 3150]]

Public Law 104-249
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
   construction of a hydroelectric project in Kentucky, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 9, 1996 -  [H.R. 2501]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise 
apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Project No. 10228, the 
Commission shall, at the request of the licensee for the project and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time period 
during which the licensee is required to commence the construction of 
the project, under the extension described in subsection (b), for not 
more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the date of 
the expiration of the extension of the period required for commencement 
of construction of the project described in subsection (a) that the 
Commission issued, prior to the date of enactment of this Act, under 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806).

    Approved October 9, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2501:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-507 (Comm. on Commerce).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):
            Apr. 16, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 9342)

#### Samuel Shapiro & Company, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1080, etc.

(Decided March 11, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity Capital Corporation, a New Mexico corporation (“Trinity”), for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William C. Enloe, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Trinity, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Trinity. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ William C. Enloe                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| William C. Enloe                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| May 12, 2008                          |
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Theaola Robinson v. The Walt Disney Company; ABC Television Network, Inc.; CC Texas Holding Co., Inc.; and KTRK Television,

Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 880

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 1 1

- 5 4895

Trial court: 234 th District Court of Harris County

On June 10, 2015, the Clerk of this Court received and filed appellant Theaola Robinson’s Appellant’s Brief and “Motion to Extend Time to File Court Brief 01

- 14

- 00880

- CV

. ” By her motion, Robinson states that she needs additional time to “copy the necessary number of briefs and submit other required information to th e court” and requests a ten

- day

extension to file her brief with this Court. In her brief, Robinson states that appendix items A through K “will be submitted within ten days.” We construe Robinson’s motion as a motion requesting additional time within whic h to file an appendix to the brief and a n additional copy of

the brief. On June 19 , 2015, Robinson filed an Amended Appellant’s Brief, which includes the appendix items. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.7. Accordingly, we dismiss as moot Robinson’s motion

.

Appellees’ brief, if any, is due to be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rus s ell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: J u ne 25, 2015
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Todd Shipyards Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: August 8, 2006

 

 

 

 

/s/ Stephen G. Welch

Stephen G. Welch, 

President and Chief Executive Officer
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 236 

Recognizing the need to pursue research into the causes, a treatment, and 

an eventual cure for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, supporting the goals 

and ideals of National Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Week, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2005 

Mr. COLEMAN (for himself, Mr. LUGAR, and Mr. BINGAMAN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, 

Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the need to pursue research into the causes, 

a treatment, and an eventual cure for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, supporting the goals and ideals of National Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Week, 

and for other purposes. 

Whereas idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a serious lung disorder causing progressive, incurable lung scarring; 

Whereas idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is one of about 200 

disorders called interstitial lung diseases; 

Whereas idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is the most common 

form of interstitial lung disease; 
2 

•SRES 236 IS

Whereas idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a debilitating and 

generally fatal disease marked by progressive scarring of 

the lungs, causing an irreversible loss of the lung tissue’s 

ability to transport oxygen; 

Whereas idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis progresses quickly, 

often causing disability or death within a few short years; 

Whereas there is no proven cause of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; 

Whereas approximately 83,000 United States citizens have 

idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and 31,000 new cases are 

diagnosed each year; 

Whereas idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is often misdiagnosed 

or under diagnosed; 

Whereas the median survival rate for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients is 2 to 3 years, and about two thirds of 

idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients die within 5 years; 

and 

Whereas a need has been identified to increase awareness and 

detection of this misdiagnosed and under diagnosed disorder: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Congress— 

2 (1) recognizes the need to pursue research into 

3 the causes, a treatment, and an eventual cure for id4 iopathic pulmonary fibrosis; 

5 (2) supports the work of the Coalition for Pul6 monary Fibrosis and its partner organizations for 

7 their great efforts to educate, support, and provide 

8 hope for individuals who suffer from idiopathic pul-
3 

•SRES 236 IS

1 monary fibrosis, including the work of the Coalition 

2 to organize a national ‘‘Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibro3 sis Awareness Week’’; 

4 (3) supports the designation of an appropriate 

5 week as ‘‘Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness 

6 Week’’; 

7 (4) congratulates the Coalition for Pulmonary 

8 Fibrosis for its efforts to educate the public about 

9 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, while funding research 

10 to help find a cure for this disorder; and 

11 (5) supports the goals and ideals of a national 

12 ‘‘Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Week’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the Annual Report of Bona Film Group Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Dong Yu, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.  Date: June 28, 2011  By:
/s/   Dong YuName:
Dong   YuTitle:
Chief Executive Officer 
 *
A   signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the   Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be   retained by the company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
No. 54188.

#### Roth & Steiner, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 103733-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Colonial Bead Co., Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 78, C. A. D. 401), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58191.

protests 223883-K, etc. (New York).

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliveb, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
(Reap. Dec. 8801)

#### Paul Rose and Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 901596-1/2; 905349.

(Decided May 15, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a reappraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff, and the cases were ordered submitted by the court.

*654Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**USArmy order of battle, 1919-1941
 
v.1 |v.2 |v.3 |v.4 |
 
SuDoc Number:D 110.2:B 32/2/
Item Number:0359-C (online)
System Number:000797150
August 14, 2019
# C_2009007EN.01000402.xml

| 13.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5384 — BNP Paribas/Fortis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 7/05)

On 3 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5384. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5384. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
(Reap. Dec. 8808)

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 854682.

(Decided May 21, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawRence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

*659Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which fends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Case: 2:12-cv-00142-EAS-MRA Doc #: 25 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00142-EAS-MRA Doc #: 25 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00142-EAS-MRA Doc #: 25 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T12:17:37-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 32





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.





The undersigned, who are the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Business Development Corporation of America (the “Company”), each hereby certify as follows:





To the best of their knowledge, the Annual Report of Form 10-K of the Company, which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 22 nd day of March 2018





/s/ Richard J. ByrneRichard J. ByrneChief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman of the Board of Directors(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Corinne D. PankovcinCorinne D. PankovcinChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)