alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 187 

Authorizing the taking of video images in the Chamber of the United States 

Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 1, 2005 

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. DODD, and Mr. FRIST) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the taking of video images in the Chamber of 

the United States Senate.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF TAKING OF VIDEO IMAGES 

3 IN SENATE CHAMBER. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Subject to subsection (b), 

5 paragraph 1 of rule IV of the Rules for the Regulation 

6 of the Senate Wing of the United States Capitol and Sen7 ate Office Buildings (prohibiting the taking of pictures in 

8 the Senate Chamber) is temporarily suspended for the 

9 purpose of permitting the C–SPAN television network to 
2

•SRES 187 ATS

1 take, during a period the Senate is in recess, video images 

2 of the Senate Chamber. 

3 (b) LIMITATION ON USE OF IMAGES.—The C–SPAN 

4 television network may use video images taken under sub5 section (a) solely for inclusion in a documentary on the 

6 history of the United States Capitol which the network 

7 is preparing. 

8 (c) ARRANGEMENTS.—The Sergeant at Arms and 

9 Doorkeeper of the Senate shall make the necessary ar10 rangements to carry out this resolution, including such ar11 rangements as are necessary to ensure that the taking of 

12 video images under this resolution does not disrupt any 

13 proceeding of the Senate.

Æ
EPA/DOT Hearing session Testimony: Aug. 6, 20 15 

I am Michael Zurakov, from Skokie, IL. 

I am here as a private citizen; I want to acknowledge the support and assistance of the Union of 

Concerned Scientists (UCS), without which I probably would not be participating. 

I am here today because of my personal engagement with the growing global crisis that is HumanCaused Climate Change. As President Obama has stated, it is the most crucial issue of our generation. 

The impacts of climate change in the coming decades will likely constitute the greatest threat our 

civilization has ever faced. Even more important, the science and mathematics tell us very clearly that 

time is short; that we must act quickly, decisively and globally if we are going to avert the most 

catastrophic effects. To that end, we must dramatically reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 

ALL sources, including the transportation sector. 

My personal commitment to this has taken our household through several changes: 

- In 2005, we changed to a gas-electric hybrid car for everyday use; 

- In 2008, it was modified to "plug in" (that is, to use some grid electric power); 

- In 20 13, we acquired a pure electric car for local travel 

Over a ten-year period, these steps have saved about 2,800 gallons of gasoline (and several tons of 

tailpipe emissions). So I have taken action, as a private c itizen, to reduce oil consumption. But I know 

that much more is needed. (As some have put it, this "carbon consumerism" cannot save the planet). 

Only far-reaching actions by policy makers can achieve the serious cuts that are needed. 

Having addressed fuel-efficiency standards for passenger vehicles, the obvious next step is to address 

the fuel-efficiency issue for aJI classes of trucks. So, I applaud the administration for proposing 

standards that will make our trucks more efficient in years to come. ln addition to the GHG reductions, 

these standards will drive innovation, create jobs. and save truckers billions of dollars in fuel costs, 

compared with today. 

As I understand them, the proposed standards would reduce fuel consumption 36 percent by 2027, 

resulting in 2035 savings of 550,000 barrels of oil per day. However, a recent UCS analysis finds that 

reducing new truck fuel consumption 40 percent by 2025 is both cost-effective and technically 

feasible. Therefore, the current proposal should be strengthened, to save an additional 200,000 barrels 

of oil per day in 2035. The urgency - the rapidly closing window of opportunity for climate action -

makes it imperative that we reduce emissions as fast and as quickly as is feasible. 

Again, I applaud the administration for proposing standards to make our trucks more efficient, and 

I urge you to finalize even stronger standards to the greatest extent feasible. 

Thank you for the opportunity to speak today.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Ride straight because the road isn't

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Ride straight because the road isn't 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Motorcycle safety, there's a lot riding on it. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  031088135.jpg; 031088135.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 59167.

protest 228863-K (Portland, Oreg.).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., a/c Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*414Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass bead Christmas tree ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Walco Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
*

49 CFR Part 234 GRADE CROSSING SAFETY

HGC – 2

Subpart B

Reports and Plans

Learning Objectives
        - Understand that these regulations require certain reports to be filed with the Federal Railroad Administration.
        - Understand under what circumstances reports must be filed.	

*

*

The purpose of an ABS system is to provide limited or full protection to a train from opposing trains and allow for protection from following trains.  To accomplish this purpose the system must be designed and maintained to the standard outlined in Subpart B.

CAUTION

The following presentation was developed to provide general information only. For detailed compliance information please refer to 49 CFR 234 – Grade Crossing Safety, Including Signal Systems, State Action Plans, and Emergency Notification Systems.  It is recommended that each employee refer to appropriate manuals and regulations when dealing with any specific issue.

*

*

When in doubt, go to the book!

Information

The FRA Grade Crossing Safety Standards are considered to be the minimum standard allowed for the installation, inspection, maintenance, and repair of highway/railroad grade crossing warning systems, devices, and appliances.  Each railroad may adopt more stringent standards. Refer to your railroad’s signal standard and instruction manual for further guidance.

*

*

*

§ 234.7  Accidents involving grade crossing signal failure.

This section requires each railroad to report each accident/incident (as defined in § 225.5(b)(1) involving highway-rail grade crossing warning system activation failure, by toll free telephone number 800-424-0201, within 24 hours.  This telephone report is not a substitute for other required written reports as appropriate.

*

Application

An accident/incident, as defined in

§ 225.5(b)(1), is an impact between on-track railroad equipment and an automobile, bus, truck, motorcycle, bicycle, farm vehicle, or pedestrian.  When an accident/incident occurs, involving an activation failure of an active highway-rail grade crossing warning system, the telephone report must be made.

*

Application

It shall not constitute an activation failure if on-track railroad equipment is not designed, equipped, and relied upon to activate such highway-rail grade crossing warning system. 

*

§ 234.9Grade crossing signal system failure reports.

This section requires that each activation failure, including those resulting in an accident/incident (as defined in § 225.5(b)(1), be reported to FRA within 15 days on Form FRA F6180.83 in accordance with the instructions contained on the form.  The completed form shall be submitted to the FRA Regional Administrator of the region in which the railroad is headquartered.

http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety/publicsite/Forms.aspx

*

*

Report Form...

S&TC  FUNDAMENTALS

49 CFR 23

Subpart B

Reports and Plans

The End

*

*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

RAYMOND K. CRUSE,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action 2:12-cv-00117

v. Judge Gregory L. Frost

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

It has come to the Court’s attention that the July 25, 2012 Report and Recommendation

failed to advise Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, of his right to object. Accordingly, and in an

abundance of caution, the Court will now correct this deficiency. Based on the circumstances

outlined in the July 25, 2012 Report and Recommendation, it is RECOMMENDED that the

Court DISMISS this action without prejudice for failure to perfect service pursuant to Rule

4(m).

If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that

party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and

Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part in

question, as well as the basis for objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The parties are specifically advised that the failure to object to the Report and

Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and

Case: 2:12-cv-00117-GLF-EPD Doc #: 6 Filed: 08/13/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. See, e.g., Pfahler v. Nat’l Latex

Prod. Co., 517 F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007) (holding that “failure to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendations constituted a waiver of [the defendant’s] ability to appeal the district

court’s ruling”); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005) (holding that

defendant waived appeal of district court’s denial of pretrial motion by failing to timely object to

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation). Even when timely objections are filed,

appellate review of issues not raised in those objections is waived. Robert v. Tesson, 507 F.3d

981, 994 (6th Cir. 2007) (“[A] general objection to a magistrate judge’s report, which fails to

specify the issues of contention, does not suffice to preserve an issue for appeal . . . .”) (citation

omitted)).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: August 13, 2012 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

 United States Magistrate Judge

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00117-GLF-EPD Doc #: 6 Filed: 08/13/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit (31)-2**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Richard D. Rodekohr, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transcontinental Gas Pipe LineCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 5, 2006     By: /s/ Richard D. Rodekohr Richard D. Rodekohr    Vice President and Treasurer    (Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 00-4418

JOEL JAIMES AVILES, a/k/a Felix

Jaimes,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham.

James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-99-261)

Submitted: February 16, 2001

Decided: March 26, 2001

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

J. Matthew Martin, MARTIN & MARTIN, P.A., Hillsborough, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney,

Sandra J. Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro,

North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Joel Jaimes Aviles appeals his conviction following a jury trial for

(1) conspiracy to distribute cocaine hydrochloride in violation of 21

U.S.C. § 846 (1994); (2) possession with intent to distribute cocaine

hydrochloride in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(West 1994 &

Supp. 2000); and (3) possession of a firearm during and in relation to

a drug trafficking offense, aiding and abetting that crime in violation

of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 924(c) & 2 (West 2000). In the sole issue raised

by Aviles in this appeal, he contends that the district court erred in

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 29 motion for acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to prove that he knowingly participated in the

offenses. 

This court reviews the denial of a motion for acquittal under a sufficiency of the evidence standard. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 29; See

Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942); United States v.

Romer, 148 F.3d 359, 364 (4th Cir. 1998). The sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case is determined by viewing the evidence in a

light most favorable to the government. The conviction must be

affirmed if the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the

government, is sufficient for any rational jury to find the elements of

the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Burgos, 94

F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir. 1996). In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we do not review the credibility of the witnesses, and we

assume that the jury resolved all contradictions in the testimony in

favor of the government. Romer, 148 F.3d at 364. 

We have reviewed the record and briefs and find sufficient evidence to support Aviles’ conviction. Accordingly, we affirm Aviles’

conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. AVILES
PUBLIC LAW 104–202—SEPT. 24, 1996 110 STAT. 2871

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1669:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Sept. 10, considered and passed Senate.

Sept. 11, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 104–202

104th Congress

An Act

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Jackson, Mississippi,

as the ‘‘G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL

CENTER, JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI.

(a) NAME.—The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center

in Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans Affairs Medical

Center’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States

shall be considered to be a reference to the G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take effect at noon

on January 3, 1997.

Approved September 24, 1996.

Sept. 24, 1996

[S. 1669]
#### Gimbel Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7550.

Entry Nos. 721724; 740030.

Invoices dated London, England, September 1945, etc.

Certified September 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 15, 1945, etc..

(Decided February 20, 1948)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-calied British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334

The cited case has been incorporated herein by consent of the parties who further agree on a set of facts, embodied in a written stipulation submitting the present cases, showing export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that' such statutory values are the appraised values of the articles *390in question, less additions made by the importers on entry because of advances in similar cases.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Have you been discriminated against?

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Have you been discriminated against? 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Labor 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019496632.jpg; 019496632.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -