alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7033

TIMOTHY MICHAEL JACKSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EARL BESHEARS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA95-1991-PJM)

Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Michael Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran,

Jr., Attorney General, Gary Eugene Bair, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Michael Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998)). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Jackson v. Beshears, No. CA-95-1991-PJM (D. Md.

June 20, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568

(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

MARK A. MAYS,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

WILLIAM D. MASON, CASE NO. C2-11-986

JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Defendant. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or

trial.

Pursuant to the Order filed January 27, 2012, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this case.

Date: January 27, 2012 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00986-EAS-MRA Doc #: 8 Filed: 01/27/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 53162.

#### Hutzler Bros. Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 47428-K, etc. (Baltimore and Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, William T. Nanovsky, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Swisher Hygiene Inc.;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and





3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.







Date : April 30, 2015
By:
/s/William T. NanovskyWilliam T. NanovskySenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

5 filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 DAN S. REGALADO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 29,968

10 HAMILTON BIG COUNTRY 

11 FORD,

12 Defendant-Appellant,

13 and 

14 THE CITIZENS BANK OF CLOVIS,

15 Defendant.

16 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

17 Geraldine E. Rivera, District Judge

18 Martin E. Threet & Associates

19 Martin E. Threet

20 Albuquerque, NM

21 for Appellee

22 Civerolo, Gralow, Hill & Curtis, P.A.

23 M. Clea Gutterson

24 Lance D. Richard

25 Albuquerque, NM
2

1 for Appellant
3

1 R. Max Best

2 Clovis, NM

3 Barnett Law Firm 

4 Mickey D. Barnett 

5 Albuquerque, NM

6 for Defendant

7 MEMORANDUM OPINION

8 BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

9 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar

10 notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the

11 time for doing so has expired.

12 Affirmed.

13 IT IS SO ORDERED.

14 

15 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

16 WE CONCUR:

17 

18 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 

19 

20 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
4
California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield 

Section

Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact 

Report/Environmental 

Impact Statement 

Volume II: Technical Appendices

November 2017
November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank
No. 40322.

#### Protests 902403-G, etc., of Thomas & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of grinding stones similar to those the subject of *Pearson, Peppard & Co.*v. *United*
      *522
      *States*(T. D. 47136). It is contended that the dictionary definitions for grindstones are broad enough to include grinding stones and that Congress did not intend to exclude all stones used or suitable for grinding purposes that were not covered by a single definition of a stone of limited use. It was found that the evidence is clear that the stones in question do not come within the classification of “a solid wheel of stone, mounted on a spindle and turned by a winch handle, by a treadle, or by machinery.” *British American Tobacco Co.*v. *United States*(17 C. C. P. A. 374, T. D. 43812), *United States*v. *Baruch*(223 U. S. 191), and *United States*v. *Lilly*(14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 332, T. D. 41970) cited. The grindstones in question were held not to come within the definition as announced by the courts. The protests were therefore overruled.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6731

ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

BUREAU OF PRISONS; MILDRED L. RIVERA,

 Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (8:10-cv-02686-SB)

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lamar Snipe seeks to appeal the magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation that relief be denied on 

Snipe’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Snipe seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

G

U

L

F

O

F

M

E

X

I

C

O

P

a

d r e

I s l a

n

d

PADRE IALAN

D

Potrero

Lopeno

NW OE E

Potrero

Lopeno SW

South of

Potrero

Lopeno NE

Potrero

Lopeno NW

Potrero

Lopeno SE

South of

Potrero

Lopeno NW

FEET

FEET

1 360 000 FEET

97°15'

26°

22'

26°

30"

97°

30"

26°45'

26°

22' 20'

45'

97° 17'30"

30"

20'

97°

52' 30"

30" 15'

17'

52'

30"

50'

47'

50'

47'30"

16 840 000

1 390 000 FEET

16 800 000

E

29

6

29

29

6

29

29

29

6

29

29

29

29

29

6

29

29

29

29

6 6

29

29

29

29

6 6

000m

6

29

6 6

29

29

29

29

6 000m 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

000m

6

000m

6 6

61

70

69

73

67

64

67

66

61

62

N

71

63

73

66

64 73

71

69

67

63

68

66 68

64

63

71

72

62

65

65

62

72

65

70

68

E 65 66

N

62 63 64 67 68 69 70 71 72

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2697-431

POTRERO LOPENO SE, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

POTRERO LOPENO SE QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2009

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 46 ́

14 MILS

4° 34 ́

81 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

PQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Michael William Slager,

Petitioner

 v.

Mr. Jefferys, Warden

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00873

Judge Economus

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

Petitioner Michael William Slager’s December 13, 2011 motion for default

judgment (doc. 15) is DENIED. Respondent timely filed his response to the petition on

December 6, 2011. Furthermore, even if respondent had failed to file a timely response,

default judgment is not available in federal habeas cases:

The failure of State officials to file a timely return does not relieve the

prisoner of his burden of proof. Default judgments in habeas corpus

proceedings are not available as a procedure to empty State prisons

without evidentiary hearings. We conclude that the failure of the Office of

the Attorney General of Ohio to file a timely return does not afford a basis

for instanter relief.

Allen v. Perini, 424 F.2d 134, 138 (6th Cir. 1970).

s/ Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00873-PCE-MRA Doc #: 17 Filed: 02/02/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# A New deal for American art in federal buildings; Work Projects Administration, 1935-1943 golden anniversary

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  A New deal for American art in federal buildings; Work Projects Administration, 1935-1943 golden anniversary 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  Soyer, Moses, 1899-1974 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. General Services Administration 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Artists on WPA by Moses Soyer, 1935 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Work Projects Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  166 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  017988881.jpg; 017988881.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
02/27/2013 13:58 FAX 2024935142 FAA**~** OMS Ill 007/009


### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEUERAL 1\ 

### VTATlON .ADMTNISTRATION OFFICE OF HEAIUNOS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

# HECEIVED

---**----------__,..-------eF~ER~~--'~1** 

## 22013 J.n the Matter ofCentralVirginia Aviation, Inc. 2012EA21003l JudgeNot Assigned


### NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

### HEAR~NG 

## DOCKET

The Clerk is requested to enter the appearance of Agency's Counsel. 

### All communications, notices, pleadings or documents are respectfullY requested to be forwarded as follows: 

### Zachary M. Berman Federal Aviation Administration Office of Regional Counsel 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, 

### NY 11434 Telephone: 718**553~3258** Facsimile: 718 995-5699 Respectfully sub111itted. Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. Regional Counsel 

### By: en nan ''.i'''"\ !\,,)

Dated: 

## 2 - 

# :J "" f 302/27/2013 13:58 FAX 2024935142 

# • 1930**Hu~tuenot** Ro<Jd 

### ro Box 35655 Rlchmond, VA 23235 (804) 320-9100 CowanGates.com

Feder"-1 Aviation Administration ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk 800 Independe11CC 1Avenue, S.W. 

### Room 924A Washington, 

### DC 20591 FAA

February 4, 2013**~** OMS

Di\VIO H. GATES (!104) 3:?.0-9100 (1!04) 330-3140 (804) 512-6985 moi!Ue liCATES@COWAI'ICATE.S,CO:I-1 2463·033

Rc: Federal Aviation Administration v. Central Virginia Aviation, Inc. Docket No. 2012EA210031 Dear Sir or Madam: Please

## con~ider this letter Central Virginia Aviation, lnc.'sreque:;l for ahearing in the above-referenced matter. Our Firm has will be representing Mr. Ham.1.p and Cenlnil Virginia A

viatiQn, Inc. in the pmceedings. !tJ 008/009

There i::; already ahearing scheduled for December 3, 2013 in FAA v. Central Vjrginia Aviation, lnc. DocketNo. 2012EA210024. The allegations inthis new matter arise from the same flight as those in Docket No. 2012EA210024. lwould ask the hearing in the above-referenced matter also be sel fur hearing December 3, 2013. For your convenience, 1have enclosed a copy of the Scheduling Order in Docket No. 2012EA210024. Thank you for your assistance with 

### thb mancr. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

cc: . 

# /

..·· Zachary M. Berman, Esq. Ocnnls F. Hanup, lil David H. Gates


# CowANGATES In any case.02/27/2013 13:58 FAX 2024835142 FAA**~** OMS

### ~ERTIFJCA 

### T.t;: OF SERVlCE

I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice ofAppearance has been placed this date in the United States mail, postage prepaid, 

### by Certitied Mail

- Retunt Receipt Requested addressed as tollows: David H. Gates, Esq. Cowan Gates 1930 Huguenot Road P.0.Box 35655 Richmond, VA 23235 Federal Aviation Administration (Original 

### and one copy) 

### ROO Independence Avenue, 

### S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: 

### Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014

r -,.. -· 

### 201:': r::.: :! 

### Date:·


### ·--- 

# -'/

I"

### ~--· . 

## ,_,......

### /,_ Paralegal 

### Specialist Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 

### 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 141008/008
# C_2008313EN.01000101.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/1

---

(2008/C 313/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 301, 22.11.2008

OJ C 301, 22.11.2008

Past publications

OJ C 285, 8.11.2008

OJ C 272, 25.10.2008

OJ C 260, 11.10.2008

OJ C 247, 27.9.2008

OJ C 236, 13.9.2008

OJ C 223, 30.8.2008

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
No. 54832.

#### Golding Bros. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6781-R (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The record disclosed that the circumstances surrounding entry and final appraisement of the present merchandise are identical with those shown in Abstracts 51047, 51672, 51860, and 52676, the records in which were incorporated by consent. All of the cited cases related to petitions like the one under consideration. In each instance, the court found as facts that prior to entry an officer of the petitioner corporation conferred with a representative of the appraiser concerning dutiable value of the merchandise and that complete cooperation was given by petitioner in supplying customs officials with information upon which appraisal was based. The petitions were therefore granted. The court held the same conclusion applicable here and found that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the customs officials as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 118 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 118

    Recognizing June 2 through June 5, 2005, as the ``Vermont Dairy 
    Festival'', in honor of Harold Howrigan for his service to his 
               community and the Vermont dairy industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 21, 2005

   Mr. Jeffords (for himself and Mr. Leahy) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing June 2 through June 5, 2005, as the ``Vermont Dairy 
    Festival'', in honor of Harold Howrigan for his service to his 
               community and the Vermont dairy industry.

Whereas the town of Enosburg Falls, Vermont, will host the ``Vermont Dairy 
        Festival'' from June 2 through June 5, 2005;
Whereas the men and women of the Enosburg Lions Club will sponsor the Vermont 
        Dairy Festival, which celebrates its 49th year;
Whereas the Vermont Dairy Festival is a beloved expression of the civic pride 
        and agricultural heritage of the people of Enosburg Falls and Franklin 
        County, Vermont;
Whereas the people of Enosburg Falls and Franklin County have long-held 
        traditions of family owned and operated dairy farms;
Whereas the St. Albans Cooperative Creamery, Inc., which was established in 
        1919, is a farmer-owned cooperative;
Whereas Harold Howrigan served on the Board of the St. Albans Cooperative for 24 
        years;
Whereas Mr. Howrigan was the President of the Board of the St. Albans 
        Cooperative for 17 years;
Whereas Mr. Howrigan recently retired from his position as President of the 
        Board of the St. Albans Cooperative; and
Whereas Mr. Howrigan led the St. Albans Cooperative to uphold the region's 
        traditions and to meet future challenges: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes June 2 through June 5, 2005, 
as the ``Vermont Dairy Festival'', in honor of Harold Howrigan for his 
service to his community and the Vermont dairy industry.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008225EN.01000101.xml

| 2.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

1 September 2008

(2008/C 225/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4621 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4569 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81165 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4608 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6064 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,68 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9635 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,815 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 237,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7037 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,3400 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5158 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,335 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7315 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7136 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5585 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4135 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0974 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0808 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 631,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3004 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9797 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1400 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 392,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9777 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,670 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,0700 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,150 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4011 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,0633 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4621

JPY

Japanese yen

157,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4569

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81165

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4608

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6064

ISK

Iceland króna

122,68

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9635

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,815

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

237,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7037

PLN

Polish zloty

3,3400

RON

Romanian leu

3,5158

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,335

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7315

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7136

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5585

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4135

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0974

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0808

KRW

South Korean won

1 631,85

ZAR

South African rand

11,3004

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9797

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1400

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 392,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9777

PHP

Philippine peso

67,670

RUB

Russian rouble

36,0700

THB

Thai baht

50,150

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4011

MXN

Mexican peso

15,0633

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---