alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1


RULE 13a-14(d) Certification





I, In-Young Chase, certify that:
 
 1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of SATURNS Trust No. 2010-03 (Alcoa) (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4.           Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer, The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of SATURNS Trust No. 2010-03 (Alcoa), has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement, which is the Trust Agreement relating to SATURNS Trust No. 2010-03 (Alcoa); and
 
 5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K.
 
 In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and its officers and agents.





By: /s/In-Young ChaseName:        In-Young ChaseTitle:          Vice PresidentDate:          March 23, 2011
AAM-11-389-E July 28, 2011

Exemption No. 9965A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0990

Mr. Craig Devenport Director of Operations West Bend Air, Inc.

P.O. Box 409 West Bend, WI 53095

Dear Mr. Devenport:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9965. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated July 11, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of West Bend Air, Inc. (WB Air), for an extension of Exemption No. 9965. That exemption from part 120 Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows WB Air, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to WB Air.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9965 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the2

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of WB Air are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the WB Air part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 9965 to November 30, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9965 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9965.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
No. 53707.

protests 146121-K (A), etc. (New York).

#### Abels Wasserberg & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 49341.

#### Protests 946699-G, etc., of Browne, Vintners Co., Inc., et al. (Detroit, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
June 7, 2024
SC-2023-0911 Ex parte Costillo Arteen Johnson (In re: Costillo Arteen Johnson v. Alabama Department of Corrections) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23- 195). ORDER This Court has elected to treat the appeal filed by Costillo Arteen Johnson as a petition for the writ of mandamus. The petition for writ of mandamus in this cause is denied. MITCHELL, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Bryan, and Mendheim, JJ., concur. Witness my hand on June 7, 2024.
Clerk of Court, Supreme Court of Alabama
# C_2016027EN.01006901.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/69

---

Action brought on 10 November 2015 — Tillotts Pharma v OHIM — Ferring (OCTASA)

(Case T-632/15)

(2016/C 027/87)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tillotts Pharma AG (Rheinfelden, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ferring BV (Hoofddorp, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘OCTASA’ — Application for registration No 8 169 881

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 September 2015 in Case R 2386/2014-4

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 239 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Infant Mortality Awareness Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2005 

Mr. MARTINEZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Infant Mortality 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas infant mortality refers to the death of a baby before 

it reaches its first birthday; 

Whereas the United States ranks 28th among industrialized 

nations in the rate of infant mortality; 

Whereas in the United States, infant mortality increased in 

2002, for the first time in more than 4 decades; 

Whereas in 2002 the rate reached 7 deaths per 1,000 live 

births, which was the first increase since 1958; 

Whereas the recent increase is a significant and troubling 

public health issue, especially for African American families, Native American families, and Hispanic families; 
2 

SRES 239 ATS

Whereas the infant mortality rate among African American 

women is more than double that of Caucasian women, according to a report produced by the National Healthy 

Start Association and by a related group supported by 

the health department of Allegheny County, in the State 

of Pennsylvania; 

Whereas the Secretary of Health and Human Services has 

designated 2010, as the year by which certain objectives 

should be met with respect to the health status of the 

people of the United States; 

Whereas such objectives, known as Healthy People 2010, include an objective regarding a decrease in the rate of infant mortality; 

Whereas September 1, 2005, is the beginning of a period of 

several months during which there will be several national observances that relate to the issue of infant mortality, including the observance of October as Sudden Infant Death Awareness Month and November as Prematurity Awareness Month; and 

Whereas it would be appropriate to observe September 2005, 

as Infant Mortality Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and 

2 ideals of Infant Mortality Awareness Month in order to— 

3 (1) increase national awareness of infant mor4 tality and its contributing factors; and 

5 (2) facilitate activities that will assist local com6 munities in their efforts to meet the objective, as es7 tablished by the Secretary of Health and Human 
3 

SRES 239 ATS

1 Service in Healthy People 2010, that the rate of in2 fant mortality in the United States be reduced to a 

3 rate of not more than 4.5 infant deaths per 1,000 

4 births. 

Æ
Exhibit 13.1

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the annual report of China Zenix Auto International Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Jianhui Lai, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|Date:  |  | April 24, 2012         
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Jianhui Lai        
|Name:  |  | Jianhui Lai            
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19025-19026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,134]


National Textiles (Sara Lee), Winston-Salem, NC; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 19, 2007, in response to a 
petition filed by on behalf of workers of National Textiles, Sara Lee, 
Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an amended 
certification for workers of Hanes Brands Inc., formerly National 
Textiles, formerly Sara Lee Branded Apparel, Division Office, Winston-
Salem, North Carolina (TA-W-57,802), which expires on September 28, 
2007. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.


[[Page 19026]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of April, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-7100 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 3.2  State SealBARBARA K. CEGAVSKE
Secretary of State
202 North Carson Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4201
(775) 684-5708
Website: www.nvsos.gov  Certificate of Correction
(PURSUANT TO NRS CHAPTERS 78,
78A, 80, 8l, 82, 84, 86, 87, 87A, 88,
88A, 89 AND 92A)Filed in the office of
/s/ Barbara K. Cegavske
Barbara K. Cegavske
Secretary of State
State of NevadaDocument Number20180071268-05Filing Date and Time02/14/2018  3:03 PMEntity NumberE0613412014-0  USE BLACK INK ONLY – DO NOT HIGHLIGHTABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Certificate of Correction (Pursuant to NRS Chapters 78, 78A, 80, 81, 82, 84, 86, 87, 87A, 88, 88A, 89 and 92A)  1.  The name of the entity for which correction is being made: AngioSoma, Inc.  2.  Description of the original document for which correction is being made: Amendment to Certificate of Designation After Issuance of Class or Series  3.  Filing date of the original document for which correction is being made:05/16/2017  4.  Description of the inaccuracy or defect: On
Section 9(b), it references Series B as well Series E stock.  Series E is the only one that should have been
written.  5.  Correction of the inaccuracy or defect: Section
9(b). No Shared Voting. The voting right of the record and beneficial owner and holder of the Series E Preferred Stock shall
have the exclusive right to exercise the voting rights of the Series E Preferred Stock. A holder of Series E Preferred Stock
shall not share, limit, assign, or grant any preference or veto to all or any part of the voting rights of the Series E
Preferred Stock and any attempt to do so shall be null, void and of no further force or effect.  6.  Signature:  X/s/ Alex K. Blankenship
    President
    02/14/2018Authorized Signature
    Title *
    Date  * If entity is a corporation, it
must be signed by an officer if stock has been issued, OR an incorporator or director if stock has not been issued,
a limited-liability company, by a manager or managing members; a limited partnership or limited-liability limited
partnership, by a general partner; a limited-liability partnership, by a managing partner; a business trust, by a trustee.  IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit with the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.  This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees.Nevada Secretary of State Stock DesignationRevised 1-5-15
# C_2008216EN.01001402.xml

| 23.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/14

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5268 — Goldman Sachs/PAI/Xella International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 216/04)

On 14 August 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5268. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5268. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 179 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 179

   To provide for oversight over the Capitol Visitors Center by the 
                       Architect of the Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2005

Mr. Lott (for himself, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frist, Mr. Reid, Mr. Stevens, Mr. 
     Durbin, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Allard) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

                             June 23, 2005

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To provide for oversight over the Capitol Visitors Center by the 
                       Architect of the Capitol.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER.

    (a) In General.--The Architect of the Capitol shall have the 
responsibility for the facilities management and operations of the 
Capitol Visitor Center.
    (b) Executive Director.--The Architect of the Capitol may appoint 
an Executive Director of the Capitol Visitor Center whose annual rate 
of pay shall be determined by the Architect of the Capitol and shall 
not exceed $1,500 less than the annual rate of pay for the Architect of 
the Capitol.
    (c) Congressional Oversight.--The responsibilities of the Architect 
of the Capitol under this section shall be subject to congressional 
oversight by the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate 
and as determined separately by the House of Representatives.
    (d) Capitol Preservation Commission Jurisdiction.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to remove the jurisdiction of the Capitol 
Preservation Commission.
                                 <all>
```
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

JOHN L. SKAGGS,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

CASE NO. C2-12-47

COMMISSIONER OF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

SOCIAL SECURITY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH P. DEAVERS

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the ORDER filed March 1, 2013, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

remanding this case to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42

U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings.

Date: March 1, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00047-EAS-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/01/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
May 2019 

Prepared by

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Railroad Administration

and

Virginia Department of Rail and 

Public Transportation

TIER II FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC T STATEMENT

AND FINAL SEC TION 4(f ) EVALUATION
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 00-4340



# 
E LIAS C ONTRERAS ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-99-209) Submitted: March 30, 2001 Decided: June 18, 2001 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSELMichael Hursey, MICHAEL HURSEY, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, A. Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Elias Contreras pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent todistribute cocaine and cocaine base. His sentencing range was properly calculated as 97 to 121 months and he was sentenced to 120 months imprisonment. Contreras raises two issues on appeal. First, he alleges that the district court misunderstood its ability to sentence him below the statutory minimum sentence of ten years. We find insufficient factual support for this contention and note that this court will not review a sentencing court’s decision as to where to impose a sentence within a properly calculated guideline range. United States v. Porter , 909 F.2d 789, 794 (4th Cir. 1990).Second, because Contreras was sentenced below the statutory maximum, his conviction and sentence are unaffected by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). See id. at 2362-63; see also United States v. Kinter , 235 F.3d 192, 199-202 (4th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 2001 WL 185105 (U.S. Mar. 19, 2001) (No. 00-8591); United States v. Lewis , 235 F.3d 215, 218-19 (4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm the sentence and conviction. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. C ONTRERAS
```

[111th Congress Public Law 341]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 3606]]

Public Law 111-341
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To extend the Child Safety Pilot Program. <<NOTE: Dec. 22, 2010 -  [S. 
                                3998]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Criminal History 
Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2010. 42 USC 5101 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminal History Background Checks 
Pilot Extension Act of 2010''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION.

    Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a note) is 
amended by striking ``92-month'' and inserting ``104-month''.

    Approved December 22, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3998:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Dec. 1, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 7, 8, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```