alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Free tax return assistance: community outreach assistance: check out free IRS group help preparing your individual income tax return

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Free tax return assistance: community outreach assistance: check out free IRS group help preparing your individual income tax return 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Rev. 12-87. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Publication ; 1198A; Publication (United States. Internal Revenue Service) ; 1198 A. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018777965.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 140 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 140

 Expressing support for the historic meeting in Havana of the Assembly 
to Promote the Civil Society in Cuba on May 20, 2005, as well as to all 
   those courageous individuals who continue to advance liberty and 
                    democracy for the Cuban people.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2005

  Mr. Martinez (for himself, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Corzine, Mr. 
Lugar, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Bayh, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Lautenberg, 
 Mr. Santorum, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. McCain, Mr. 
Craig, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Allen, Mr. Brownback, Mr. 
 Enzi, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Levin, Mr. Baucus, and Mr. Bunning) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Foreign Relations

                              May 17, 2005

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for the historic meeting in Havana of the Assembly 
to Promote the Civil Society in Cuba on May 20, 2005, as well as to all 
   those courageous individuals who continue to advance liberty and 
                    democracy for the Cuban people.

Whereas on May 20, 1902, the Republic of Cuba obtained its independence;
Whereas in the spirit of Jose Marti, many of the future leaders of a free Cuba 
        have called for a meeting of the Assembly of the Civil Society in Cuba, 
        an organization that consists of over 360 dissident and civil society 
        groups in Cuba;
Whereas, on May 20, 2005, the Assembly to Promote the Civil Society in Cuba 
        seeks to convene a historic meeting in Havana on the 103rd anniversary 
        of Cuban Independence; and
Whereas the Assembly to Promote the Civil Society in Cuba will focus on bringing 
        democracy and liberty to the island of Cuba: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) extends its support and solidarity to the participants 
        of the historic meeting, in Havana, of the Assembly to Promote 
        the Civil Society in Cuba on May 20, 2005;
            (2) urges the international community to support the 
        Assembly and its mission to bring democracy and human rights to 
        Cuba;
            (3) encourages the international community to oppose any 
        attempts by the Cuban government to repress, punish, or 
        intimidate the organizers and participants of the Assembly; and
            (4) shares the pro-democracy ideals of the Assembly to 
        Promote the Civil Society in Cuba and believes that the 
        Assembly and its mission will advance freedom and democracy for 
        the people of Cuba.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 2, 2016

No. 04-16-00723-CV

FE EXPRESS, LLC and Francisco Javier Bernal,

Appellants

v.

Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS, as next friend and guardian of Samara Isabella Morales 

Serna and Samantha Isabel Morales Serna, minor children, and as Administrator of the Estate of 

Samuel Morales Castillo, Deceased,

Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CVT001295 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Appellants have filed an emergency motion for an immediate, temporary stay of the trial 

court’s October 28, 2016 turnover order. We grant the motion for temporary stay and order the 

trial court’s October 28, 2016 “Order Granting Post-Judgment Relief” is stayed pending further 

order of this court. We order any response to appellants’ emergency motion shall be filed by 

November 7, 2016.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, David L. Bradshaw, Chief Executive Officer of Tipperary Corporation, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tipperary Corporation, Inc. (registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Reserved;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design of operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely effect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:      |  | November 14, 2003                      
|---------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|           | 
|Signature: |  | /s/ David L. Bradshaw David L. Bradshaw
|Title:     |  | Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN MCPHAUL, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-95-22-BO, CA-96-127-BO) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John McPhaul, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Elaine Tompkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:John McPhaul seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McPhaul , Nos. CR-95-22-BO; CA-96-127- BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6839** 

KIM PURNELL , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN, RIDGELAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 3:09

- cv - 02424

- RBH )

Submitted : August 26, 2010 Decided: September 7, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Kim Purnell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding prece dent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kim Purnell seeks to appeal the district court’s order s accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The se order s are not appealable unless a circuit j ustice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) ; see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim o f the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Purnell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We di spense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of WTTJ Corp, on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Klamka, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and December 31, 2012 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of WTTJ Corp.



|            |     |                                                               | 
|----------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|May 3, 2013 | By: | /s/ Peter Klamka                                              | 
|            |     | Peter Klamka                                                  | 
|            |     | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer               | 
|            |     | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of NGL Energy Partners LP (the “***Partnership***”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, Craig S. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of NGL Energy Holdings LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“***Section 906***”), that, to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 
| Dated: June 29, 2011 | /s/ Craig S. Jones                 |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                      | Craig S. Jones                     |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer of         |
|                      | NGL Energy Holdings LLC, the       |
|                      | general partner of the Partnership |

 

This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 64312.

protests 294980-K, etc. (New York).

#### Arnart Imports, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





         To my knowledge, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the thirteen
weeks ended June 28, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Tasty Baking Company. In accordance with
clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to
the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except
to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.


                                      By:          /S/ Charles P. Pizzi
                                          -----------------------------------
                                                Name:  Charles P. Pizzi
                                                Title: President and
                                                       Chief Executive Officer



                                      By:        /S/ David S. Marberger
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:      David S. Marberger
                                      Title:     Senior Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


Date:  August 8, 2003
# C_2007183EN.01000101.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/1

---

(2007/C 183/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 170, 21.7.2007

OJ C 170, 21.7.2007

Past publications

OJ C 155, 7.7.2007

OJ C 140, 23.6.2007

OJ C 129, 9.6.2007

OJ C 117, 26.5.2007

OJ C 96, 28.4.2007

OJ C 95, 28.4.2007

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
(Reap. Dec. 8366)

#### Lansen-Naeve Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 772779.

(Decided December 1, 1954)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> 1) That the instant appeal to reappraisement covers magnifying glasses from Germany.

> 2) That on or about the date of exportation such or similar magnifying glasses were freely offered for sale for export to the United States in the principal market of Germany in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, at Deutschemark 1.80 each.

> 3) That on or about the date of exportation such magnifying glasses were freely offered for sale for home consumption in Germany at no higher price.

> 4) That the instant appeal to reappraisement is hereby submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was deutschemark 1.80 each.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JAMES T. FIDLER, Recruit, U. S. Army, Appellant

12 USCMA 454, 31 CMR 40

No. 14,635

July 28, 1961

*455
      *First Lieutenant Thomas Stapleton*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel W. H. Black-marr*and *First Lieutenant Robert D. Stiles.*

*Captain William A. Zeigler*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel James G. McConaughy,*and *First Lieutenant Jerome Nelson.*

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

This is a companion case to United States v Woolbright, 12 USCMA 450, 30 CMR 36, this day decided. Unlike Woolbright, however, Recruit Fidler was convicted only of willful disobedience of an order of Second Lieutenant Charles R. Hoffman, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 90, 10 USC § 890, and of failure to obey a lawful order of his guard, Private First Class Albert P. Loriot, in violation of Code, supra, Article 92, 10 USC § 892. On the basis of these and other, unrelated findings, he was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement at hard labor for three years. Intermediate appellate agencies affirmed, and we granted review on the issue of the legality of the orders involved in the findings of guilty. As in United States v Woolbright, supra, the accused also filed a petition for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence indicating that the golf course upon which he was ordered to work was the property of a private association.

The record of trial is devoid of any evidence indicating that the golf course here involved was privately owned or operated. From the specification and proof, it appears to be located on a military reservation. On the basis of the record, therefore, it cannot be stated that the orders to the accused were unlawful.

Once again, as in *Woolbright,*supra, the evidence regarding the ownership of the course and the nature of the Fort Leonard Wood Golf Club is found only in the petition for new trial. For the reasons set forth in that case, it is clear that the accused here also did not exercise due diligence at the trial level with respect to this matter. Hence, the petition for new trial must be denied.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed, and the petition for new trial is denied.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.