alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008154EN.01002301.xml

| 19.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/23

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5126 — Ineos/BASF Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 154/06)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 7 May 2008, the Commission of the European Communities received notification of a proposed concentration between Ineos and BASF Assets. On 3 June 2008, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GU AN GF U L I U, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 71088 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 339- 712 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y17, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G uangf u L i u, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e m and and d is m is s in g h is ap p e a l f

r o m an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to re op en re m ov alproceedi ng s c on du ct ed i n absent i a. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 

# FI LED JU L 24 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 71088 2 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e m and o rr e o p e n , Mo vs is ia n v . A s h c r o ft , 39 5 F . 3d 10 95 , 10 98 (9th C i r. 20 05 ), and revi ew d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s , se e Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 400 F . 3d 785, 791- 92 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng L i u’ s m ot i on t o r e m and b a s e do n in e f

f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. B e c au s e L iud idn o t d e m o n s tr a te i ns uf f i c i e ntnot i c e of

hi s he ar i ng, he di d note s t abl i s h tha tf orm e rc ouns e l ’ s a c t i ons “m ayh av e a f

f e c te dth e o u tc o m e ” o f

h is p r o c e e d in g s . See 8 C. F. R. § 1 00 3. 23 (b)( 4)(i i ); Moh am m ed , 400 F . 3d a t793- 94 ( t o pr e va i l on an i ne f f e c t i ve as si st ance cl ai m , a pet i t i on erm ustdem on strat e that“ the performance of coun se l w a s s o in a d e qu a te th a t it m ayhave aff ec t ed the ou t com e of the proceedi ng s” ) ( in te rn a l c ita tio n o m itte d ) ) . I n a ddi t i on, the a ge nc ydi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng L i u’ s s e c ond m o tio n to r e o p e n a s n u m b e r - b arr e d . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . In l i g h to f o u r d i sp o si t i o n , w e n eedn o treach L i u ’ s rem ai n i n g du e p ro cess c o n te n tio n s . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .
SERVED NOVEMBER 23, 2010 

-•-:PARTMENTOF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT|ON^p|STOT^^^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS -' -'rtHATIONS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

A'O !-^v 2 3 P ZU 2 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FLIGHTSTAR AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL00!3 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNO. FAA-2010-1077 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

Tiiis proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2008-GL-05-0022) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, 

and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Lonnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10GL0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville,MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Glenn L. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Feder^ Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines, XL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7063 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C, Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room El 2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EPA States Consultation and Coordination Webinar on Potential Reinterpretation of

Clean Water Act TAS

September 3, 2015 2:00 – 4:00 p.m. EDT

Webinar Summary

Presenters: Tom Gardner, EPA Office of Science and Technology

Tod Siegal, EPA Office of General Counsel

Moderator: Luke Cole, EPA Office of Science and Technology

Participants: See last page – about 20 participants attended

PRESENTATION SUMMARY 

The webinar began with introductions and instructions for participants, followed by a

presentation by Mr. Gardner and Mr. Siegal based on briefing slides available in the docket for 

the rulemaking at www.regulations.gov. Search for Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0461. 

The webinar continued with an opportunity for questions and comments from state participants. 

Questions were submitted by participants either in writing through the chat window to the EPA 

moderator, Mr. Cole, or over the phone after the phone lines were opened.

The following is a list of questions received from state participants during the webinar. For each

of the questions, the EPA presenters provided responses that were consistent with the

presentation materials and other information available at http://www.epa.gov/wqs-tech/revisedinterpretation-clean-water-act-tribal-provision. Views and comments provided were

acknowledged.

QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

 Would you explain the bullet for TAS for new clean water act programs? 

 What counts as "reservation lands"?

 What is the difference between this proposal versus the 2014 proposal?

 Will the SAFETEA-LU requirements for Oklahoma tribes trigger a case-by-case analysis 

as mentioned on one of the slides (maybe slide 12?), rather than the blanket assumption 

provided by this proposed interpretive rule?

 Will this action be affected by the ongoing litigation between Wyoming and EPA on TAS 

boundary irregularities related to the Wind River Indian Reservation? The current 

litigation is related to CAA.

 EPA had suggested that it met with both states and tribes in several meetings, can you give 

a breakdown?
WEBINAR ATTENDEES

First Name Last Name Affiliation

Julia Anastasio ACWA

Iona Black Yale

Michelle Bushman Western States Water Council

Nephi Cole Wyoming Government

Trevor Flynn Kansas Dept. of Health and Environment

Jason Garber

Melissa Gildersleeve Washington State

Andrew Hanson US EPA

Sylvia Heaton MDEQ

Susan Kirsch ACWA

Les Lemm Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources

Jeromy Pankratz Office of the Attorney General, State of South Dakota

Michael Rivera CA Assembly - District 31

Kimberly Roth NEIWPCC

Gina Shirey State of Alaska/Department of Environmental Conservation

Derek Smthee Oklahoma Water Resources Board

Debra Sturdevant Oregon DEQ

Maja Tritt EPA

Adriene Weaver NCDENR/DWR

Kent Woodmansey
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-50981 Summary Calender

DEBORAH KASTRIN, WILLIAM J. KASTRIN, SCORRO KASTRIN, WILLIAM FRED KASTRIN, VERONICA KASTRIN CALLAGHAN, & KASCO VENTURES, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

CBS INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(EP-96-CV-433-DB) July 17, 1998

Before KING, DUHE’, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM: * Following a jury verdict in favor of the defendant-appellee,
the district co urt entered a final judgment dismissing the plaintiffs-a ppellants’ case. The plaintiffs do not appeal from this judgment. Upon entry of final judgment, the district courtalso ordered, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d), that costs would

be taxed against the plaintiffs and in fa vor of the defendant as the prevailing party. Subsequently, a Bill of Costs was filed by
the defendan t and, in turn, objected to by the plaintiffs. The district court rejected the plaintiffs’ objections and approved the Bill of Cost as filed. It is from this determination that the plaintiffs appeal.

In taxing costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) the district
court is accorded great latitude and its determination may be reversed only upon a showing of abuse of discretion. Breeland v. Hide-A-Way Lake, Inc., 585 F.2d 716, 722 (5t h Cir. 1978); s ee 10
Charles A. Wright, et al., F EDERAL P RACTICE AND P ROCEDURE 3d §2668, at 227-30 (1998). After a review of the record on appeal, the briefs
and the law, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   8-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                           11665
<SECURITIES>                                     27698
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7561
<ALLOWANCES>                                       662
<INVENTORY>                                       1907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 61609
<PP&E>                                           67196
<DEPRECIATION>                                   47027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  111014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            17056
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                       56517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    111014
<SALES>                                          19485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 19485
<CGS>                                            16811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    19541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    429
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                429
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2550-2551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Advisory Board for Exceptional Children

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Education, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
Bureau of Indian Education is announcing that the Advisory Board for 
Exceptional Children will hold its next meeting in Washington, DC. The 
purpose of the meeting is to meet the mandates of the Individuals with 
Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEIA) on Indian 
children with disabilities.

[[Page 2551]]


DATES: The Board will meet on Saturday, February 3, 2007, from 6 p.m. 
to 9 p.m.; Sunday, February 4, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.; and Monday, 
February 5, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Local Time.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Wardman Park Marriott 
Hotel, 2660 Woodley Road, NW., Washington, DC 20008, on Saturday, 
February 3, 2007, and Sunday, February 4, 2007, and at the Department 
of the Interior, Main Building, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20240, Room <greek-i> 3622, on Monday, February 5, 2007.
    Written statements may be submitted to Mr. Thomas M. Dowd, 
Director, Bureau of Indian Education, 1849 C Street, NW., MS-3609 MIB, 
Washington, DC 20240; Telephone (202) 208-6123; Fax (202) 208-3312.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley R. Holder, Designated Federal 
Official, Bureau of Indian Education, Division of Compliance, 
Monitoring and Accountability, P.O. Box 1088, Suite 332, Albuquerque, 
New Mexico 87103; Telephone (505) 563-5270.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Advisory Board was established to advise 
the Secretary of the Interior, through the Assistant Secretary--Indian 
Affairs, on the needs of Indian children with disabilities, as mandated 
by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 
(Pub. L. 108-446).
    The following items will be on the agenda:
    <bullet> Special Education Director's Report
    <bullet> Status of Annual Performance Report
    <bullet> IDEIA Regulations Training
    <bullet> 2006-2007 Monitoring Activities
    <bullet> Dispute Resolution Activities
    <bullet> Review of the 2005-2006 Annual Report
    <bullet> Eligibility Determination for Special Education Services: 
Reading First Procedures and/or Response to Intervention
    <bullet> Mental Health Needs
    The meetings are open to the public.

    Dated: January 12, 2007.
Michael D. Olsen,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. E7-744 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-6W-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with this quarterly report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Dale H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                           |   |
|                           |   |
| Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.     |   |
| Chief Executive Officer        |   |
| March 17, 2011            |   |

 

1

----
# C_2007315EN.01000802.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 October 2007 — European Parliament v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-403/05) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Commission decision approving a project relating to border security in the Philippines - Decision adopted on the basis of Regulation (EEC) No 443/92 - Commission's implementing powers - Limits)

(2007/C 315/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: R. Passos, E. Waldherr, K. Lindahl and G. Mazzini, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Tufvesson and A. Bordes, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by J.M. Rodríguez Cárcamo, acting as Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Annulment of the Commission decision approving a project relating to border security in the Philippines (ASIA/2004/016-924; budgetary line 19 10 02) adopted in implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 443/92 of 25 February 1992 on financial and technical assistance to, and economic cooperation with, the developing countries in Asia and Latin America (OJ 1992 L 52, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court :

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities approving a project relating to border security in the Republic of the Philippines to be financed by budget line 19 10 02 in the general budget of the European Communities (Philippines Border Management Project, No ASIA/2004/016-924); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities approving a project relating to border security in the Republic of the Philippines to be financed by budget line 19 10 02 in the general budget of the European Communities (Philippines Border Management Project, No ASIA/2004/016-924);

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 14.1.2006.

1

---
#### National Silver Co. *v.*United States

No. 7529.

Entry No. 771245.

Invoice dated Sheffield, England, April 17, 1946.

Certified April 29, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 25, 1946.

(Decided February 3, 1948)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 48046.

#### Protests 643688-G, etc., of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise in question consists of cotton rags the same as those involved in *United States*v. *Schapiro*(24 C. C. P. A. 343, T. D. 48771). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1750 was sustained in accordance with the percentages as stipulated.
Case: 2:12-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 1 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 2 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 3 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 4 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 5 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 6 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 7 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 8 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 9 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 10 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T16:20:00-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                       986
<INVENTORY>                                     10,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,551
<PP&E>                                          18,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,081
<BONDS>                                         12,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,576
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,809
<SALES>                                         81,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,536
<CGS>                                           79,532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,004
<INCOME-TAX>                                       613
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,391
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>