alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Each of the
undersigned officers of Tampa Electric Company (the Company) certifies, under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2005 |  | /s/ S. W. HUDSON       
|                   |  | S. W. HUDSON           
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|Dated: May 9, 2005 |  | /s/ G. L. GILLETTE     
|                   |  | G. L. GILLETTE         
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the
Form 10-Q.
No. 58162.

protest 203650-K (New York).

#### Trans-Delta Corporation *v.*United States,

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case relates to certain black suede kid leather imported from Mexico and entered for consumption on June 15, 1949. At the time of entry, estimated duty was deposited under paragraph 1530 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem, for leather imported to be used in the manufacture of footwear. In the liquidation of the entry, however, duty was assessed on the merchandise at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem by reason of the failure of the importer to produce an affidavit of use of the leather in the manufacture of footwear within 3 years from the date of entry, the period prescribed for the filing of such affidavit under section 10.84 of the Customs Regulations of 1943. Protest is now made against the action of the collector in assessing duty at the higher rate.

There is record evidence showing that the leather in question was exclusively used in the manufacture of footwear, but the date of such usage of the present merchandise was beyond the period prescribed by the said customs regulations. Hence, the sole issue before us is whether the customs regulations, fixing a time limit within which the imported leather shall be used in the manufacture of footwear in order to obtain the benefit of a lower rate of duty, are valid.

Precisely the same issue now presented was before us in the case of *Max Rosenberg*v. *United States,*32 Cust. Ct. 295, C. D. 1616, wherein we sustained plaintiff’s *523contention in bolding that section 10.84 of the Customs Regulations of 1943, so far as it attempts to fix a time limit on the use of imported leather in the manufacture of footwear, is of no legal effect and is void.

Since the merchandise in question is substantially the same as that which was before the court in the *Max Rosenberg*case, *supra,*and the legal proposition now before us is identical with that presented in the said case, we, therefore, follow the reasoning employed and the conclusion reached therein and hold that the customs regulations involved in this controversy, as hereinabove identified, are invalid, and that the leather in question is dutiable at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1530 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as claimed by plaintiff.

The protest is sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2008140EN.01000502.xml

| 6.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5083 — Groupama/OTP Garancia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 140/03)

On 15 April 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5083. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5083. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The Bicentennial of the Judiciary Act of 1789, and justice for all!

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The Bicentennial of the Judiciary Act of 1789, and justice for all! 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Archives and Records Administration in cooperation with the Committee on the Bicentennial of the Constitution of the Judicial Conference of the United States 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  192 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  020842018.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 54825.

#### Henry L. Goetz et al. *v.*United States,

protests 160631-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**CYNTHIA MACQUEEN TURNER**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 184 DB 2015 (No. 3 RST 2016)**  **Attorney Registration No. 63077**  **(Philadelphia)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 19 th**  **day of January, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated January 7, 2016, is appr oved and it is ORDERED that**  **Cynthia MacQueen Turner, who has been on Inactive Sta tus, has never been**  **suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications,**  **competency and learning in law required for admission t o practice in the**  **Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act ive status as a member of the**  **Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation**  **and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit ioner.**
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.F. Hughes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.


/s/ J.F. Hughes
-------------------------
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
October 2, 2006
(Reap. Dec. 9762)

#### J. T. Steeb & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1178.

(Decided August 4, 1960)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the instant appeal consists of binoculars and leather carrying cases which, in *John P. Uerher & Co. Inc.*v. *United States,*C.D. 1519, this court held to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of the binoculars and cases.

> 2. At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities, in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States were the following unit prices plus the proportionate share of packing and cases, freight to shipping port, storage, insurance premium, light-erage and handling, and petties as shown on the invoice, the foreign value of such or similar merchandise being no higher.

> Item Binocular Case

> 7 x 50 $15. 50 $2. 90

> 6 x 25 7.20 .85

> 3. The instant appeal for reappraisement is limited to the items hereinbefore enumerated and abandoned in all other respects and the said appeal submitted for decision.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values for the items covered by the appeal herein were the following unit prices, plus the proportionate share of packing and cases, freight to shipping port, storage, insurance premium, lighterage and handling, and petties, as shown on the invoice:

> Item Binocular Case

> 7 x 50 $15. 50 $2.90

> 6 x 25 7.20 . 85

This appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           14267
<SECURITIES>                                     32942
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7037
<ALLOWANCES>                                       511
<INVENTORY>                                       9146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 63382
<PP&E>                                           26792
<DEPRECIATION>                                   38496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  109599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            13298
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         38301
<OTHER-SE>                                       27828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    109599
<SALES>                                          61572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 61572
<CGS>                                            61133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    61133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2807
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2807
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2807
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: May

8, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Ray

Saracino , EPA Region 9 SUBJECT: May

7, 2015 , M eeting with the Concentrating Solar Power All i ance (CSPA) Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on May 7, 2015 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014 and published in the Federal Register on June 18, 2014. **ATTENDEES** See attachment sign in sheet **Attachment s**  Concentrating Solar Power Alliance Meeting - presentation 050715 Concentrating Solar Power Alliance Meeting - sign in sheet 050715
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                  2,371
<SECURITIES>                                            2,237
<RECEIVABLES>                                           8,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                             6,996
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       21,667
<PP&E>                                                130,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                         44,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        114,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   9,975
<BONDS>                                                31,454
<COMMON>                                                2,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                             22,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          114,023
<SALES>                                                19,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       31,264
<CGS>                                                  14,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          20,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      2,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (1,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (545)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (665)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (665)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.53)


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 9, 2022

No. 04-22-00583-CV

IN RE Sondra GROHMAN

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15705

Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On September 9, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency

motion for stay pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. After considering 

the petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

Relator’s motion for emergency relief is DENIED as moot.2

It is so ORDERED on September 9, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

1This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15705, styled In the Matter of The Marriage of Sondra Grohman and 

Larry Wegner, pending in the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas, the Honorable Albert D. 

Pattillo, III presiding.

2 Opinion to follow.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 192 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 192

 Affirming that the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United 
   States guarantees the freedom of the press and asserting that no 
 purpose is served by sentencing journalists Judith Miller and Matthew 
     Cooper, nor any similarly situated journalists, to prison for 
           maintaining the anonymity of confidential sources.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2005

  Mr. Lautenberg (for himself, Mr. Lugar, and Mr. Dodd) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Affirming that the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United 
   States guarantees the freedom of the press and asserting that no 
 purpose is served by sentencing journalists Judith Miller and Matthew 
     Cooper, nor any similarly situated journalists, to prison for 
           maintaining the anonymity of confidential sources.

Whereas the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States guarantees 
        the freedom of the press;
Whereas it is essential to the democracy of the United States that journalists 
        may report important information to the public without fear of 
        intimidation or imprisonment;
Whereas a majority of the States and the District of Columbia have enacted media 
        shield laws to protect the right of journalists to maintain the 
        anonymity of confidential sources;
Whereas Robert Novak, the columnist first to publish the identity of a covert 
        Central Intelligence Agency officer by name, stated that the Government 
        should not imprison journalists for maintaining the anonymity of 
        confidential sources;
Whereas a United States district court judge may soon sentence Matthew Cooper, 
        the White House correspondent for Time Magazine, and Judith Miller, a 
        journalist for the New York Times, to prison for contempt for refusing 
        to disclose confidential sources;
Whereas that United States district court judge will hold a hearing to consider 
        arguments against imprisonment of those journalists; and
Whereas it is the responsibility of the United States Senate to make its views 
        known in areas of national and legal importance: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) affirms that the First Amendment of the Constitution of 
        the United States guarantees the freedom of the press; and
            (2) proclaims that no purpose is served by imprisoning 
        journalists Judith Miller and Matthew Cooper.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9294 

To encourage the Secretary of the Army to support the implementation 

of hybrid-electric engine technology within the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle fleet, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2024 

Ms. SLOTKIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To encourage the Secretary of the Army to support the 

implementation of hybrid-electric engine technology within the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle fleet, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON USE OF HYBRID-ELEC4 TRIC ENGINE TECHNOLOGY IN MILITARY 

5 WHEELED VEHICLES. 

6 It is the sense of Congress that— 

7 (1) the use of hybrid-electric propulsion tech8 nology in military wheeled vehicles has been shown 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9294 IH

1 to provide enhanced lethality to warfighters com2 pared to the use of conventional engine technology 

3 in such vehicles; and 

4 (2) the Secretary of the Army should support 

5 efforts to implement hybrid-electric engine tech6 nology within the High Mobility Multipurpose 

7 Wheeled Vehicle fleet of the Army. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB