alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 1 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 2 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 3 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 4 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 5 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 6 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 7 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 8 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 9 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 10 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 11 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00130-EAS-MRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 09/27/12 Page: 12 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T12:28:13-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
110 STAT. 3150 PUBLIC LAW 104–249—OCT. 9, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2501:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–507 (Comm. on Commerce).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Apr. 16, considered and passed House.

Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–249

104th Congress

An Act

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction

of a hydroelectric project in Kentucky, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period specified

in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would

otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Project No. 10228, the Commission shall, at the request of the

licensee for the project and after reasonable notice, in accordance

with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements

of that section and the Commission’s procedures under that section,

extend the time period during which the licensee is required to

commence the construction of the project, under the extension

described in subsection (b), for not more than 3 consecutive 2-

year periods.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect on the

date of the expiration of the extension of the period required for

commencement of construction of the project described in subsection

(a) that the Commission issued, prior to the date of enactment

of this Act, under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

806).

Approved October 9, 1996.

Oct. 9, 1996

[H.R. 2501]
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Claudio Pablo Lopez, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Navios South American Logistics Inc.;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 4, 2013



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Claudio Pablo Lopez      
|Claudio Pablo Lopez          
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C AS C AD E HE AL T H S OL UT I ON S F KA M CKENZI E- W I LL I AM ET TE H O S P I T A L , an O r e g o n n o np r o f it c orpor a t i on, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. P E A C E H E A L T H , aW a s h in g to n S tate nonpr of i tc orpor at i on, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee , and PA CI FI CSO U RCE H EA LTH PLA N S, D e f

e n d an t, RE GENCE B LUEC ROSS BL UESHI EL D OF OREGON ; PR OV I DENCE HEALT H PL AN ; M CKENZI E- W I LL I AM ET TE RE GI ON AL M EDI CAL C ENTE R A SSO CI A TES, LLC, D efen d an t -In t erv en o rs. N o. 05- 35627 D. C. No . CV- 0 2 - 0 6 0 3 2 - ALH D is tr ic t o f

O r e g o n , P ort l and OR DE RVA C AT ING P R I OR OR DE RC E R T I F YING Q U E S T I O N T O T H E S U P R E ME C OU R T OF OR E GO N, AN D FOR I SS UA NCE OF M AN DA TE

M CKENZI E- W I LL AM ET TE HO SP I TAL, N o. 05- 35640 

# FI LED SEP 03 2008 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSP l ai nt i ff - A pp el l ee , v. P E A C E H E A L T H , aW a s h in g to n S tate nonpr of i tc orpor at i on, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t, and PA CI FI CSO U RCE H EA LTH PLA N S, D e f

e n d an t, RE GENCE B LUEC ROSS BL UESHI EL D OF OREGON ; PR OV I DENCE HEALT H PL AN ; M CKENZI E- W I LL I AM ET TE RE GI ON AL M EDI CAL C ENTE R A SSO CI A TES, LLC, D efen d an t -In t erv en o rs. D. C . No . C V- 0 2 - 0 6 0 3 2 - HA D is tr ic t o f

O r e g o n , P ort l and

M CKENZI E- W I LL AM ET TE HO SP I TAL, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. P E A C E H E A L T H , aW a s h in g to n S tate nonpr of i tc orpor at i on, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 05- 36153 D. C . No . C V- 0 2 - 0 6 0 3 2 - HA D is tr ic t o f

O r e g o n , P ort l andM CKENZI E- W I LL AM ET TE

H O S P I T A L , an O r e g o n n o np r o f it c orpor a t i on, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. P E AC E HE AL T H, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 05- 36202 D. C . No . C V- 0 2 - 0 6 0 3 2 - HA

B efo re: G O U L D , P A E Z , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. O n A ug ust25 , 20 08 , thi s C ou rtw as advi se d thatthe part i es have res ol ved th e d is p u te th at g av e r is e to th is ap p e a l. I n lig h t o f th is r e s o lu tio n , th e m o tio n to va c a t e c e rt i f

i c at i on and f

orm anda t e i s G R A N T E D . O urpr i orO r de rC e rt i f y i ng Q ue s t i on T o T he S upr e m e C ourtO f O r e gon i s he r e byV A C A T E D . T he que s t i on ce rt i fi ed t o the O re go n S up re m e C ou rtshal lbe w i thd raw n andou r c l erk o f c ou rt shal ltransm i ta c op y of thi s ordert o the O re go n S up re m e C ou rtw i th adv i ce that w e w i th draw o u r cert i fi edqu est i o n w h i ch i s n o w m o o ti n l i g h to f th e p art i es’ r e s ol ut i on of

the appe a l . A l s o, the c l e rk of ourc ourti s i ns truc t e d t o i s s ue the m an d a te in th is c a s e .- 4-
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129448 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129448 COA: 263520 Montcalm CC: 01-000086-FH SETH ALAN RICORD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

K ELLY , J., would remand this case to the Mo ntcalm Circuit Court with instructions to vacate the $300 fine.

d0125 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2006

Clerk
# C_2008089EN.01001001.xml

| 10.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/10

---

New national face of euro coins intended for circulation

(2008/C 89/04)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties involved who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), euro-area Member States and those countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins intended for circulation are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro coins for circulation, on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro coins intended for circulation, but bear a commemorative design on the national face.

1

2

Issuing country: Italian Republic

Subject of commemoration: 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights

Description of the design: The inner part of the coin depicts a man and a woman with an olive branch, an ear of corn, a cogwheel and some barbed wire, symbols representing the right to peace, food, work and freedom respectively, along with the links of a chain broken to form the figure ‘60o’. In the centre of the coin are the initials of the issuing country ‘RI’; to the left the year 2008; to the right the initials ‘MCC’ of the artist Maria Carmela Colaneri and the mint mark ‘R’; at the bottom, a cartouche with the inscription ‘DIRITTI UMANI’.

o

The outer ring of the coin depicts the twelve stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 5 million

Approximate date of issue: April 2008

Edge lettering: 2 ★, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted.

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national sides of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Council (General Affairs) of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also the Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, p. 38).

2

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MICHELLE MATHIS,

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-156

v. Judge George C. Smith

 Magistrate Judge Deavers

DOCTOR’S HOSPITAL (WEST), et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the United States Magistrate Judge’s

March 22, 2012 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 2). The Magistrate Judge conducted

an initial screen of Plaintiff’s Complaint as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and recommended

that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s purported federal causes of action for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over

Plaintiff’s remaining state-law claims, dismissing these claims without prejudice. 

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advises Plaintiff that

the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results

in a “waiver of the right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the right to

appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 10, ECF No. 2). The

time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not

objected to the Report and Recommendation. 

Case: 2:12-cv-00156-GCS-EPD Doc #: 5 Filed: 04/16/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections have

been filed and that the time for filing such objections expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and

Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and the Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s

remaining state-law claims, DISMISSING these claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ George C. Smith 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00156-GCS-EPD Doc #: 5 Filed: 04/16/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 41945.

#### Protest 477556-G of Salem Shawiry (New York).

*352Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of laces embroidered. On the authority of *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551) the claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was sustained.
## Advance Letter (E

- Mail Text)

Dear < principal or superintendent name >,
I am contacting you on behalf of the U.S. Department of Education to discuss an opportunity for

< district or school name > to participate in a study aimed at preventing high school dropout. This study would provide access to the National High School Center’s Early Warning and Intervention Monitoring System (EWIMS) along with high

- quality professional development technical support at no cost. The EWIMS process involves using data to i dentify at

- risk students early in high school and assigning struggling students to interventions that get them back on track for on

- time graduation. Conducted by the REL Midwest Regional Educational Laboratory at American Institutes for Research (AIR), the project will examine the impact of implementing EWIMS on a host of critical student outcomes (validated indicators of dropout, course performance, persistence and progress in school and likelihood of on

- time graduation). In addition, the project will exam ine the impact of EWIMS on how schools make use of data to allocate limited dropout prevention resources.

Attached please find a document that briefly describes the project. Our initial records indicate that your district/school may be eligible to partici pate in this project funded by the U.S. Department of Education’s Institutes for Educational Sciences. I would like to schedule a brief phone call with you to tell you more about the project, ascertain your interest in taking part, and to discuss whether t his might be a great opportunity for < district or school name >.
Would you be able to touch base briefly by phone on <day>, <month> <date>? Please feel free to reach me by email or at 312

- 283

- 2318.

Thank you and I look forward to speaking with you!

<name of project outreach rec ruiter>

<name of project outreach recruiter> Project Outreach On

- Time Graduation Project Midwest Regional Educational Laboratory American Institutes for Research 20 North Wacker Drive, Suite 1231, Chicago, IL 60606
t : 312.283.2318 | www.air.org

Per the policies and procedures required by the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, Title I, Part E, Section 183, responses to this data collection will be used only for statistical purposes. The reports prepared for this study will summarize findings

a cross the sample and will not associate responses with a specific district or individual. Any willful disclosure of such information for nonstatistical purposes, except as required by law, is a class E felony.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 28, 2015

d0720 

# Order

Clerk July 28, 2015

149597(53)

JOHN BIUNDO, as Personal Representative of the

Estate of REITHA M. BIUNDO, Deceased,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 149597

COA: 313569

Wayne CC: 10

- 011810

- NH

SURJIT S. MAHAL, M.D.,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 3

, 2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
# C_2008113EN.01000402.xml

| 8.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5089 — Domo Chemicals/Carmel Olefins/Domo Propylene JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 113/03)

On 25 April 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5089. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5089. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
p. 1


# OAR Box 1190 Prepped byCandice Davis



### Document

Number: 

# 65 ) ll-B- 3 Docket Number: 

# A-90-2 8

Printed 5/5/20089:13:51 AM

Sheet 65of 106P. 2



# j\r^^%

LA WOFFICE S TRAINUM , SNOWDO N& DEAN E

APROFESSIONA L CORPORATIO N

SUIT E 55 0 131 7 F STREET . N.W . WASHINGTON , D.C . 2000 4

(202 ) 783-548 8 FACSIMIL E (202 ) 783-550 2 JOH N RUSSEL L DEAN E II I RICHAR D W . SNOWDO N II I CHARLE S A . TRAINUM , JR . CHRISTOPHE R J . KERSTIN G

COUNSE L THOMA S A . FRAZIER . JR . VIRGINI AOFFIC E (703 ) 371-941 9 MARYLAN D OFFIC E (-4IO ) 263-918 2 Septembe r 28 , 199 5



### EP AAI R DOCKE T Mr . Charle s N . Free d Directo r Manufacturer s Operation s Divisio n[6405 ] U.S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y Watersid e Mal l 40 1 MStreet , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2046 0 Re : Docke t No . A-90-28 : Octobe r 17 , 199 5 Publi c Hearing : Waive r Reques t fo r Californi a OB D I I Regulation s Dea r Mr . Freed : Onbehal f o f the Specialt yEquipmen t Marke t Associatio n (SEMA ) an

d th e Aut o Internationa l Associatio n (AIA) , thi s i s t o notif ythe EPAtha t I wis ht o testif yo n the waive r reques t o f the Californi a Ai r Resourc e Board (CARB ) concerning it s on-board diagnostic s (OB

D II ) regulations . Pleas e infor mm e a s soo na s possibl e whe nth e tentativel yschedule d Octobe r 17 , 199 5 hearing ha s bee nconfirmed . Thank yo u fo r you r assistanc e i n thi s matter , an yquestions , pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t me . incerely , I f yo u hav e

RUSSEL L DEANE II I ra l Counse l ialtyEquipmen t Marke t Associatio n Internationa l Associatio n
No. 54211.

#### Quon Quon Company *v.*United States,

protest 138982-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# C_2008208EN.01000401.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/4

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2008/C 208/03)

OJ C 207 of 14.8.2008

OJ C 207 of 14.8.2008

History of previous publications:

OJ C 202 of 8.8.2008

OJ C 196 of 2.8.2008

OJ C 194 of 31.7.2008

OJ C 188 of 25.7.2008

OJ C 118 of 15.5.2008

OJ C 106 of 26.4.2008

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 194 

Relative to the death of Gaylord A. Nelson, former United States Senator 

for the State of Wisconsin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2005 

Mr. FRIST (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. KOHL, Mr. JEFFORDS, 

Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BAUCUS, 

Mr. BAYH, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOND, Mrs. 

BOXER, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BURNS, Mr. BURR, Mr. 

BYRD, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARPER, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mrs. 

CLINTON, Mr. COBURN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. COLEMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. 

CONRAD, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. DODD, Mrs. DOLE, Mr. DOMENICI, 

Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. 

GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. 

HATCH, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. 

JOHNSON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERRY, Mr. KYL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. 

LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. LINCOLN, 

Mr. LOTT, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, 

Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON of Florida, 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. REED, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SMITH, Ms. 

SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. 

TALENT, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. THUNE, Mr. VITTER, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. 

WARNER, and Mr. WYDEN) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Relative to the death of Gaylord A. Nelson, former United 

States Senator for the State of Wisconsin.
2

•SRES 194 ATS

Whereas Gaylord A. Nelson served in the United States Army 

from 1942–1946; 

Whereas Gaylord A. Nelson served as Governor of the State 

of Wisconsin from 1959–1963; 

Whereas Gaylord A. Nelson served the people of Wisconsin 

with distinction for 18 years in the United States Senate; 

Whereas Gaylord A. Nelson served the Senate as Chairman 

of the Select Committee on Small Business from the 

Ninety-Third through the Ninety-Sixth Congresses and 

as Chairman of the Special Committee on Official Conduct in the Ninety-Fifth Congress; and 

Whereas Gaylord A. Nelson received the Presidential Medal 

of Freedom in 1995: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound 

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death 

3 of the Honorable Gaylord A. Nelson, former member of 

4 the United States Senate. 

5 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu6 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives 

7 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the 

8 deceased. 

9 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it 

10 stand adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem11 ory of the Honorable Gaylord A. Nelson.

Æ