alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Raid on Ploesti historical map

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Raid on Ploesti historical map 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  2000-20101940-1950 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Country        
                    -  Europe 
                    -           State        
                    -  Romania 
                    -           Town        
                    -  Ploiești 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  163 × 40 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  PostersMaps 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  d5.312.p72.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIAM RUSSELL WALKER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1725

[December 3, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 31-2007-CF-000936 A.

William Russell Walker, Chipley, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 46298.

#### Protests 29777-K, etc., of Davies Turner & Co. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists - of graphite and plumbago which is practically identical in condition with the graphite passed upon in *Starkey*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 118, C. D. 444). In accordance therewith the graphite in question was held dutiable as amorphous graphite at 5 percent under paragraph 213 and T. D. 49753. The protests were therefore sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 92 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 92

   To authorize State enforcement of immigration laws, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize State enforcement of immigration laws, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Immigration Enforcement Act''.

SEC. 2. STATE ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS.

    States, or political subdivisions of States, may enact, implement 
and enforce criminal penalties that penalize the same conduct that is 
prohibited in the criminal provisions of immigration laws (as defined 
in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1101(a)(17))), as long as the criminal penalties do not exceed the 
relevant Federal criminal penalties (without regard to ancillary issues 
such as the availability of probation or pardon). States, or political 
subdivisions of States, may enact, implement and enforce civil 
penalties that penalize the same conduct that is prohibited in the 
civil provisions of immigration laws (as defined in such section 
101(a)(17)), as long as the civil penalties do not exceed the relevant 
Federal civil penalties.

SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

    Section 274A(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1324a(h)) is amended by striking paragraph (2).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit (31)-2**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Richard D. Rodekohr, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transcontinental Gas Pipe LineCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 4, 2007     By: /s/ Richard D. Rodekohr Richard D. Rodekohr    Vice President and Treasurer    (Principal Financial Officer)
Amendment to the Outstanding Option Grant Agreements--John L. Armstrong,Jr


 Exhibit 10.8 
 CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEDGED 
 August 11, 2008 
 John L. Armstrong, Jr. 
 c/o Genaera Corporation 
 5110 Campus Drive 
 Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 
  

	Re:	Amendment to Outstanding Option Grant Agreements  

 Dear Jack:

 Genaera is amending the outstanding Option Grant Agreements awarded to you, as listed on Schedule A, to hereby add the following language as new
Item 12 to the Option Grant Agreements pertaining to the Amended 2004 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan and the Amended 1998 Equity Compensation Plan: 
 Employment Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and Grantee’s existing or future employment agreement with the Company, if any, the terms of such employment agreement
shall control. 
 Except as amended above, all other terms and conditions of your Option Grant Agreements shall remain in full force and effect. 

Please indicate your acceptance of this amendment by your signature below and return to Human Resources by August 15, 2008. 
  

	
	 /s/ R. Frank Ecock

	R. Frank Ecock
	Chair, Compensation Committee

  

			
	Accepted:	 	 /s/ John L. Armstrong, Jr.

		
	Date:	 	August 13, 2008







 Schedule A 
  


								
	 Grant Date
	  	 Option Plan
	  	Grant Price	  	Granted
	 10/27/2003
	  	1998 Plan	  	$	26.70	  	16,667
	 7/23/2004
	  	1998 Plan	  	$	19.14	  	16,667
	 12/8/2004
	  	1998 Plan	  	$	21.60	  	16,667
	 7/27/2005
	  	2004 Plan	  	$	10.14	  	33,334
	 12/8/2005
	  	2004 Plan	  	$	8.13	  	33,334
	 8/1/2006
	  	2004 Plan	  	$	2.64	  	25,000
	 12/12/2006
	  	2004 Plan	  	$	2.22	  	25,000
	 5/18/2007
	  	2004 Plan	  	$	2.75	  	200,000
	 9/26/2007
	  	2004 Plan	  	$	2.98	  	275,000
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v CHARLES J. MITCHELL, Recruit, and JAMES E. BOWERS, Recruit, U. S. Army, Appellants

11 USCMA 497, 29 CMR 313

No. 13,852 and No. 13,878

Decided May 20, 1960

*Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Herrod*and *First Lieutenant Jerome D. Meeker*were on the brief for Appellants, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel James G. MeConaughy*and *First Lieutenant Allen 1. Saeks*were on the brief for Appellee, United States. *First Lieutenant Richard E. Wiley*was also on the brief for Appellee, United States, in No. 13,878.

Opinion of the Court

Geoege W. LatimeR, Judge:

These accused were tried together before a general court-martial on charges of robbery, larceny, and unlawful detention, violations of Articles 122, 121, and 97, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 922, 921, and 897, respectively. Both pleaded guilty, and each was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for five years. Intermediate appellate authorities affirmed, and thereafter we granted accused’s respective petitions for review limited to the single issue of whether their convictions under Article 97 of the Code, supra, may stand.

It appears from the record that neither of these accused was authorized to apprehend or arrest. In United States v Hardy, 11 USCMA 487, 29 CMR 303, this day decided, we rejected the argument that the Article was limited in its application to persons possessing that authority, and held that the statute proscribed such conduct by any person subject to the Code. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the above-cited case, we must resolve the granted issue adversely to these accused.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

FERGUSON, Judge

(dissenting) :

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Hardy, 11 USCMA 487, 29 CMR 303, this day decided.
# Selec t Securit y 'd m

Jul y19 , 201 0 Mr . Denni s J . DeVane y Chief , Essentia l Servic e Dis t X-5 3 Offic e o f Aviatio n Analytic s US Dept . o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D

C 2059 0 Dea rMr . DeVaney , W e ar e a snnal l busines s locate d i n Franklin , P Aan d ar e writin g t o infor m yo u o fou rsuppor t t o Optio n 1 o f Guifstrea m international' s proposa l t o continu e offerin g essentia l ai rservic e t o ou rcommunity . W e ma yno t trave l as frequentl ya s som e large rbusinesses , bu t fee l tha t th e loca l ai rtrave l optio n i s importan t an d w e wil l commi t t o usin g ou rloca l servic e provide d b yGuifstrea m Internationa l wheneve r possible . Thi s servic e i s a grea t asse t t o ou rcommunity . Than k yo u fo ryou rtime . Sincerely ,

Gar yMoys e
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 179 

To provide for oversight over the Capitol Visitors Center by the Architect 

of the Capitol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2005 

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. DODD, Mr. FRIST, Mr. REID, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. ALLARD) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

JUNE 23, 2005 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To provide for oversight over the Capitol Visitors Center 

by the Architect of the Capitol. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Architect of the Capitol shall 

4 have the responsibility for the facilities management and 

5 operations of the Capitol Visitor Center. 

6 (b) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.—The Architect of the 

7 Capitol may appoint an Executive Director of the Capitol 

8 Visitor Center whose annual rate of pay shall be deter-
2 

SRES 179 ATS 

1 mined by the Architect of the Capitol and shall not exceed 

2 $1,500 less than the annual rate of pay for the Architect 

3 of the Capitol. 

4 (c) CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT.—The responsibil5 ities of the Architect of the Capitol under this section shall 

6 be subject to congressional oversight by the Committee on 

7 Rules and Administration of the Senate and as determined 

8 separately by the House of Representatives. 

9 (d) CAPITOL PRESERVATION COMMISSION JURISDIC10 TION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to re11 move the jurisdiction of the Capitol Preservation Commis12 sion. 

Æ
110 STAT. 3010 PUBLIC LAW 104–209—OCT. 1, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1772:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–528 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Apr. 23, considered and passed House.

Sept. 18, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–209

104th Congress

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain interests in Waihee

Marsh for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge Complex.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE INTERESTS FOR INCLUSION IN

THE OAHU NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX.

(a) AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE.—The Secretary of the Interior

may acquire, for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge

Complex, the area known as the Waihee Marsh, located on the

northeast coast of the Island of Oahu, Hawaii, consisting of approximately 36 acres (as determined by the Secretary) along both sides

of Kamehameha Highway.

(b) MANAGEMENT OF ACQUIRED INTERESTS.—Lands and

interests acquired by the United States under this section shall

be managed by the Secretary of the Interior as part of the Oahu

National Wildlife Refuge Complex.

Approved October 1, 1996.

16 USC 668dd

note.

Hawaii.

Oct. 1, 1996

[H.R. 1772]
# Noise Model
# C_2007269EN.01001901.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Landessozialgericht (Germany), lodged on 30 July 2007 — Kattner Stahlbau GmbH v Maschinenbau- und Metall-Berufsgenossenschaft

(Case C-350/07)

(2007/C 269/37)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Sächsisches Landessozialgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kattner Stahlbau GmbH

Applicant:

Defendants: Maschinenbau- und Metall-Berufsgenossenschaft

Defendants:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the respondent Maschinenbau- und Metall-Berufsgenossenschaft an undertaking within the meaning of Articles 81 EC and 82 EC? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the respondent Maschinenbau- und Metall-Berufsgenossenschaft an undertaking within the meaning of Articles 81 EC and 82 EC?

| 2. | Does the compulsory affiliation of the appellant to the respondent infringe Community law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the compulsory affiliation of the appellant to the respondent infringe Community law?

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 239 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 239

  Supporting the goals and ideals of Infant Mortality Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2005

Mr. Martinez submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
        the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting the goals and ideals of Infant Mortality Awareness Month.

Whereas infant mortality refers to the death of a baby before it reaches its 
        first birthday;
Whereas the United States ranks 28th among industrialized nations in the rate of 
        infant mortality;
Whereas in the United States, infant mortality increased in 2002, for the first 
        time in more than 4 decades;
Whereas in 2002 the rate reached 7 deaths per 1,000 live births, which was the 
        first increase since 1958;
Whereas the recent increase is a significant and troubling public health issue, 
        especially for African American families, Native American families, and 
        Hispanic families;
Whereas the infant mortality rate among African American women is more than 
        double that of Caucasian women, according to a report produced by the 
        National Healthy Start Association and by a related group supported by 
        the health department of Allegheny County, in the State of Pennsylvania;
Whereas the Secretary of Health and Human Services has designated 2010, as the 
        year by which certain objectives should be met with respect to the 
        health status of the people of the United States;
Whereas such objectives, known as Healthy People 2010, include an objective 
        regarding a decrease in the rate of infant mortality;
Whereas September 1, 2005, is the beginning of a period of several months during 
        which there will be several national observances that relate to the 
        issue of infant mortality, including the observance of October as Sudden 
        Infant Death Awareness Month and November as Prematurity Awareness 
        Month; and
Whereas it would be appropriate to observe September 2005, as Infant Mortality 
        Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and ideals of Infant 
Mortality Awareness Month in order to--
            (1) increase national awareness of infant mortality and its 
        contributing factors; and
            (2) facilitate activities that will assist local 
        communities in their efforts to meet the objective, as 
        established by the Secretary of Health and Human Service in 
        Healthy People 2010, that the rate of infant mortality in the 
        United States be reduced to a rate of not more than 4.5 infant 
        deaths per 1,000 births.
                                 <all>
```
No. 99-40843

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40843

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JULIO CESAR HERNANDEZ-PINEDA,

also known as Gustavo Angel Garcia,

also known as Joaquin Gutierrez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-98-CR-621-1

--------------------

March 14, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Julio Cesar Hernandez-Pineda appeals on the sole ground

that the district court did not afford him the right to allocution

before imposing sentence. The Government agrees that the sentence

should be vacated and the case remanded so that Hernandez-Pineda

may be afforded the right to allocution.

The district court shall, before imposing sentence,

address the defendant personally and ask whether he wishes to make

a statement in his behalf and to present information in mitigation

of sentence. See Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 32(a)(1)(C) (West 1999). The
No. 99-40843

-2-

sentencing court must “leave no room for doubt that the defendant

has been issued a personal invitation to speak prior to

sentencing.” United States v. Echegollen-Barrueta, 195 F.3d 786,

789 (5th Cir. 1999) (internal quotations and citation omitted). We

review the record de novo to determine whether the district court

afforded the defendant the right to allocution; the issue is not

subject to harmless or plain error analysis. See EchegollenBarrueta, 195 F.3d at 789. 

The record demonstrates that the district court did not

comply with Rule 32(a)(1)(C). Accordingly, Hernandez-Pineda’s

sentence is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for resentencing.

VACATED and REMANDED.
FORM 10-Q

                                                                 Exhibit 12

                            TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY

                            RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



      The following table sets forth the company's ratio of earnings to 
      fixed charges for the periods indicated.



  Nine Months       Twelve Months
     Ended              Ended                    Year Ended December 31,
Sept. 30, 1996      Sept. 30, 1996         1995  1994(1)  1993(2) 1992  1991

    4.79x               4.45x              4.50x 4.11x    3.98x   4.16x 3.66x
  

      For the purposes of calculating this ratio, earnings consist of income 
      
      before income taxes and  fixed  charges.   Fixed  charges  consist  of 
      
      interest on indebtedness, amortization  of debt  premium, the interest 
      
      component of rentals and preferred stock dividend requirements.    

                                                                           

(1)   Includes  the  effect  of a $21.3-million pretax restructuring charge.  
      The effect of this charge was to reduce the ratio of earnings to fixed 
      charges.   Had  this  non-recurring  charge  been  excluded  from  the 
      calculation,  the  ratio  of earnings to fixed charges would have been 
      4.52x for the period ended Dec. 31, 1994.  

(2)   Includes the effect of the  non-recurring  $10-million  pretax  charge 
      associated with a coal pricing settlement.  The effect of this  charge 
      was  to  reduce  the  ratio  of  earnings  to fixed charges.  Had this 
      non-recurring charge been excluded from the calculation, the ratio  of 
      earnings to  fixed  charges  would  have been 4.17x for the year ended 
      Dec. 31, 1993.













                                          - 17 -<PAGE>