alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Moving America new directions, new opportunities, can you meet the challenge?

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Moving America new directions, new opportunities, can you meet the challenge? 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Federal Highway Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Federal Highway Administration 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Federal Highway Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  151 × 38 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  027606150.jpg; 027606150.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
##### 



WAIVER UNDER
CREDIT AGREEMENT
 Waiver Borrower Lenders Administrative Agent Co-Lead Arranger
 WITNESSETH:
 Credit Agreement
 New Board Election
 Section 7.12 Change of Control Default)
  Section 1. Definitions
 Section 2. Waiver
 Section 3. Representations and Warranties
 3.01 No Default Section 4
 3.02 Representations and Warranties True and Correct




---



##### 



3.03 Corporate Power, Etc
 3.04 No Conflict .
 3.05 Binding Effect
 Section 4. Conditions Effective Date Section 4:
 4.01 Execution of the Waiver
 4.02 Delivery of Documents .
 4.03 Representations and Warranties Section 3
 4.04 Compliance with Terms .
 2




---



##### 



Section 5. Miscellaneous.
 5.01 Continuing Effect .
 5.02 No Waiver .
 5.03 Governing Law .
 5.04 Severability
 5.05 Counterparts .
 5.06 Headings .
 5.07 Binding Effect; Assignment .
 5.08 Expenses
  3




---



##### 



BREEZE-EASTERN CORPORATION,
as BorrowerBy:

/s/ Joseph F. SpanierName:
    Joseph F. SpanierTitle:
    Exec. VP, CFO & TreasurerWELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC.
as Administrative Agent and LenderBy:
    /s/ Peter SchueblerName:
    Peter SchueblerTitle:
    Vice PresidentAC FINANCE LLC,
as Co-Lead ArrangerBy:

/s/ Eric GrobergName:
    ERIC GROBERGTitle:
    MANAGING DIRECTORALLIED CAPITAL SENIOR DEBT FUNDING
2007-1,
as LenderBy:
    AC Corporation, Its Collateral ManagerBy:
    /s/ Eric GrobergName:
    ERIC GROBERGTitle:
    MANAGING DIRECTOR
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/16

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
(Reap. Dec. 9329)

#### Machine & Tool Company *v.*United States

Entry No. F-480.

(Decided February 24, 1959)

Plaintifi not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement presents the question of the proper dutiable value of 13 grinding wheels which accompanied the importation of a Jones Lamson Thread Grinder.

It appears from the record in this case that the thread grinder was American goods returned and that the grinding wheels were of Canadian manufacture. As to said grinding wheels, which constitute the only merchandise before the court in this appeal for a reappraisement, it was orally stipulated and agreed by the parties hereto that, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $5 Canadian currency each, packed, and that there was no higher export value.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(c)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis for determining the value of the 13 grinding wheels in controversy and that said value is $5 Canadian currency each, packed.

As to any other merchandise, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2008257EN.01S00301.xml

| 9.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

#### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorcrossSafety Products L.L.C. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, David F.Myers, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| Dated: August 13, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ DAVID F. MYERS, JR.                            |
|------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |   | David F. Myers, Jr.                                |
|                   |   |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                   |   |   | Secretary and Manager                              |
|                   |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)       |

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
#### T. D. Downing Co. *v.*United States

No. 7541.

Entry No. 862.

Invoice dated Yeovil, England, July 5, 1945.

Certified July 5, 1945.

Entered at Boston, Mass., August 29, 1945.

(Decided February 18, 1948)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

-Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40562

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RANDY O’NEIL DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CR-76-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 20, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Randy O’Neil Davis appeals his guilty plea conviction and

sentence for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute.

Davis argues that the Government breached a promise as to the

quantity of drugs or the length of Davis’ sentence. Davis also

challenges the amount of drugs attributable to him and the finding

that he was a leader or organizer.

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and AFFIRM

the district court. Davis has failed to prove the underlying facts

establishing a promise and breach by a preponderance of the
evidence. United States v. Price, 95 F.3d 364, 367 (5th Cir.

1996). Davis is responsible for the amount of drugs sold by

codefendant Michael Issac because those sales were part of the same

course of conduct or part of a common scheme or plan as the count

of conviction. United States v. Bryant, 991 F.2d 171, 177 (5th

Cir. 1993). We note that Davis was not held accountable for any

drugs sold by codefendant Christopher Levias. Even if the district

court erred in including the drugs found in Timothy Davis’

possession, the error is harmless as Davis’ base offense level

would remain unchanged. Finally, the district court did not

clearly err in finding that Davis was an organizer or leader with

respect to Issac and Levias given the evidence in the record that

they both worked for Davis. United States v. Valencia, 44 F.3d

269, 272 (5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.
No. 54827.

#### Biddle Purchasing Co. *v.*United States,

petition 6788-R (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It appeared that the merchandise was entered at its invoice value, subsequently amended to a higher value, and then reamended to the original invoice value in order to make a test case. An appeal for reap-praisement was abandoned because information later received from the shipper failed to support the entered value. One of petitioner’s witnesses testified that upon arrival of the merchandise in the United States he sent the shipping documents and other necessary papers to his customs broker for the purpose of making entry, at the same time instructing him to confer with the examiner prior to entry. He communicated with the shipper and made an investigation as to the values of competitive items but received no information from the exporter other than that the prices stated for this particular transaction were correct. The customhouse broker testified that prior to making entry he had consulted with the examiner and that he also had written to the shipper requesting information as to the value but had received no reply. On the record presented it was held that there was no intent to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to defraud the revenue of the United States or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Case No. 6,864.

#### In re HULST.

[7 Ben. 40.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Nov., 1873.

Privilege op Witness — Receiver Appointed by a State Court a Witness in Bankruptcy Proceedings — Possession op Books and Papers.

A. was appointed receiver by the New York supreme court, in supplemental proceedings against H. Afterwards, in bankruptcy proceedings against H., A. waB summoned as a witness before the register, under section 26 of the bankruptcy act [of 1867 (14 Stat. 529)]. A suit was pending against him, for the possession of the bankrupt’s books, brought by the assignee *870in bankruptcy. He appeared, but declined to be sworn, or to produce the books, except upon the order of the court which appointed him receiver: *Held,*that the receiver was not privileged, but must be sworn as a witness under the bankruptcy act, and answer the questions put to him; that he must also produce the bankrupt’s books, to be used, on the examination, as evidence; but that the books were to remain in his possession, and were not to be surrendered to the assignee.

The register certified the facts, in this case for the decision of the court, as follows: Daniel Adee was appointed receiver by the New York supreme court, upon supplemental proceedings instituted by a judgment creditor of [William W.] Hulst, the bankrupt. During the proceedings in bankruptcy, in this case, before the register, Adee was summoned as a witness, and required to produce the books and accounts of Hulst, under his control as receiver. He came, but declined tp be sworn and examined. It was contended against him, that section 26 of the bankruptcy act (Rev. St. §§ 5086, 5087 [14 Stat. 529]), allows no privilege to a witness as officer of a state court, but covers all persons.

S. 6. Courtney, for assignee.

G. W. Niles, for witness.

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The witness must be sworn, and submit to be examined, under section 26. It must depend upon the course of examination, whether any books must be produced.

In accordance with this decision, the receiver, Adee, appeared, was sworn as a witness, and was examined. He was then required to produce the books and papers in his control. He was willing to produce them, but only for use as evidence at the examination before the register, alleging that an equity suit for the possession of them was then pending, brought against him, as receiver, by said assignee, and that he was entitled to retain possession until the determination of that suit. He further claimed, that section 14 of the bankruptcy act applies to clerks and others having custody of books and accounts, but not to a receiver, who, by authority of court, owns them. The register held that the receiver must produce and surrender the books, &c., to the assignee. This he refused to do; and the register, by request, (certified the question for decision of the court.

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

Mr. Adee is entitled, at present, to refuse to deliver up the books to the assignee, or to give him possession thereof. But he must produce them to be used, on the examination, as evidence.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

LOUIS LOWE,

Petitioner,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2:12-CV-142

JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed February 25, 2014, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: February 25, 2014 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00142-EAS-MRA Doc #: 26 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                           TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  Exhibit 27, Financial Data Schedule to Report
                          on Form 10Q, November 30, 1999
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,226,030
<SECURITIES>                                     4,943,992
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,666,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                       173,264
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,136,130
<PP&E>                                           2,045,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,906,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,569,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,609,631
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            60,783
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,899,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,569,926
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,635,639
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,798,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,901,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,156,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,787,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,369,190
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,369,190
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.45



</TABLE>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Adelante. Hispanic heritage, a legacy of involvement: 1988 Hispanic Heritage Week, 12-17 September 1988

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Adelante. Hispanic heritage, a legacy of involvement: 1988 Hispanic Heritage Week, 12-17 September 1988 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Hispanic heritage, a legacy of involvement 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  189 × 56 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  19406340.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:12-cr-214

Jamil Furquan Sayles 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 19). The court

accepts the defendant’s plea of guilty to the information, and he

is hereby adjudged guilty. The court will defer the decision of

whether to accept the plea agreement until the sentencing hearing.

Date: November 28, 2012 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cr-00214-JLG-EPD Doc #: 21 Filed: 11/28/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>