SUSANA MARTINEZ 

Gov€mor 

JOHN A. SANCHEZ 

Lieutenant Governor 

NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT 

Surface Water Quality Bureau 

Harold Runnels Building, N2050 

ll90 South St. Francis Drive (87505) 

P.O. Box 5469, Santa Fe, NM 87502-5469 

Phorie (505) 827-0187 Fax (505) 827-0160 

www.nmenv.state.nm.us 

Original via UPS -- Copy via Electronic Mail 

December 10, 2013 

Mr. William K. Honker, Director 

Water Quality Protection Division ( 6WQ) 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

Re: State Certification 

Dear Mr. Honker: 

DAVE MARTIN 

Secretary 

BUTCHTONGATE 

Deputy Secretary 

ERIKA SCHWENDER 

Director 

Resource Protection Division 

Enclosed, please find the state certification for the following proposed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination 

System (NPDES) permit: 

NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities - NMROSOOOO 

If any, comments and conditions are enclosed on separate sheets. 

U.S. Enviromnental Protection Agency (USEPA) proposes to regulate discharges under the above-referenced 

NPDES Individual Permit. A state Water Quality Certification is required by the federal Clean Water Act 

(CWA) §401 to ensure that the action is consistent with state law (New Mexico Water Quality Act, sections 74-

6-1 through 74-6-17, New Mexico Statutes Annotated (NMSA) 1978) and complies with state Water Quality 

Standards [State of New Mexico, Standards for Interstate & Intrastate Surface Waters, New Mexico Water 

Quality Control Commission, 20.6.4 New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC)], the Water Quality 

Management Plan/Continuing Planning Process, including Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), and the 

Antidegradation Policy. 

Pursuant to State regulations for permit certification (Section 20.6.2.2001 NMAC), USEPAjointly with NMED 

issued a public notice of the draft permit and announced a public comment period posted on the NMED web site 

www.nmenv.state.nm.us/swqb/WQA/Notice on September 27, 2013. The public comment period ended on 

November 26, 2013. NMED received no comments by the end of the comment period. 

Sincere! , 

e gan, Bureau Chief 

rface Water Quality Bureau 
Page 2 of2 

December 10, 2013 

NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities- NMROSOOOO 

cc: (w/enclosures) 

Ms. Diane Smith, USEPA (6WQ-NP) via e-mail 

Mr. Brent Larsen, USEPA (6WQ-PP) via e-mail 
Mr. Ron Curry, Regional Administrator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1445 Ross Avenue 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 Date: December 10, 2013 

STATE CERTIFICATION 

Re: NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit NPDES Permit No. NMR050000 

Dear Mr. Curry, 

The New Mexico Environment Department has examined the proposed NPDES permit above. The 

following conditions are necessary to assure compliance with the applicable provisions of the Clean Water 

Act Sections 208(e), 301,302,303,306, and 307 and with appropriate requirements of State law. 

Compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit and this certification will provide reasonable 

assurance that the permitted activities will be conducted in a manner which will not violate applicable 

water quality standards and the water quality management plan and will be in compliance with the 

antidegradation policy. 

The State of New Mexico 

( ) certifies that the discharge will comply with the applicable provisions of Sections 208( e), 

301,302,303,306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act and with appropriate requirements of 

State law. 

( x) certifies that the discharge will comply with the applicable provisions of Sections 208(e), 

301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act and with appropriate requirements of 

State law upon inclusion of the following conditions in the permit. 

( ) denies certification for the reasons stated in the attachment. 

( ) waives its right to certify. 

In order to meet the requirements of State law, including water quality standards and appropriate basin 

plans as may be amended by the water quality management plan, each of the conditions cited in the draft 

permit and the State certification shall not be made less stringent. 

The Department reserves the right to amend or revoke this certification if such action is necessary to ensure 

compliance with the State's water quality standards and water quality management plan. 

Please contact me at (505) 476-3671, if you have any questions concerning this certification. Comments 

and conditions pertaining to this draft permit are attached. 

a es , Chief 

Surface Water Quality Bureau 
NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities 

Permit Number NMR050000 

State Certification of the Proposed Permit 

December 10,2013 

Conditions of Certification 

The following revisions are necessary to ensure that discharges eligible for coverage under the NPDES Multi 

Sector General Permit (MSGP) for storm water discharges from industrial facilities [as defined in 40 CFR Part 

122.26(a)(4)] protect State water quality standards adopted in accordance with §303 of the Clean Water Act 

(CWA) and the New Mexico Water Quality Act [Chapter 74, Article 6 NMSA 1978]. State water quality 

standards are published in the document entitled Standards for Interstate and Intrastate Surface Waters, New 

Mexico Water Quality Control Commission, 20.6.4 NMAC (As amended through June 5, 2013) (WQS). 

And the regulations also state at 40 CFR § 124.53(e)(2): 

State certification shall be in writing and shall include: 

(2) When the State certifies a draft permit instead of a permit application, any conditions more stringent 

than those in the draft permit which the State finds necessary to meet the requirements listed in 

paragraph (e)(J) of this section. For each more stringent condition, the certifying State agency shall 

cite the CWA or State law references upon which that condition is based. Failure to provide such a 

citation waives the right to certify with respect to that condition. 

NMED is conditioning this certification based on State law and the federal Clean Water Act as identified below 

to ensure that compliance with this permit protects designated uses across the State of New Mexico. 

Condition # 1: 

40 CFR Part 122.44( d)( 1 )(i) states: 

Limitations must control all pollutants or pollutant parameters (either conventional, nonconventional, 

or toxic pollutants) which the Director determines are or may be discharged at a level which will cause, have 

the reasonable potential to cause, or contribute to an excursion above any State water quality standard, 

including State narrative criteria for water quality. 

NMED's Water Quality Management Plan states in Part V.A: 

NMED will assure through appropriate review and communication with the permitting authority that 

permit requirements and effluent limitations are compatible with appropriate state law, protect water quality 

. standards and implement the water quality management plan. 

Although stormwater benchmark concentrations are not rigid permit limits (and therefore an exceedance of a 

benchmark value is only an indicator of the need to assess and fix or implement improved Best Management 

Practices, as indicated in EPA's Industrial Stormwater Monitoring and Sampling Guide, March 2009), it is 

critically important that these values are protective of in-stream water quality standards. In addition, a protective 

benchmark value ensures that accumulative effects of many discharges will not present the potential to exceed 

an in-stream water quality standard. 

Table 1 below lists the proposed benchmark values in the 2013 MSGP. NMED has added an additional column 

with the state water quality standard value below these benchmark values from the Standards for Interstate and 

Intrastate Surface Waters (as approved on June. 5, 2013), 20.6.4.900 NMAC. 
1: 

Pollutant 

NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities 

Permit Number NMR050000 

State Certification of the Proposed Permit 

December 10,2013 

MSGP Benchmark (as Lowest New Mexico Hardness 

Water Standard value 

standard 

No standard 

*EPA's are ona water mg!L. totest 

these hardness values and use EPA's Table 1 in Appendix J of the permit to determine their applicable limit. 1 NMED's criteria are listed at a hardness value of 100 mg/L as CaC03 for comparison to EPA's benchmark standard. 2 S04 dependent 

Due to the nature of storm water discharges in the arid west, pollutants can accumulate on the ground surface for 

long periods of time between rain events. Once the rain does occur during New Mexico's monsoon period (May 

to October), it washes the accumulated pollutants down to the receiving water. Based on this specific hydrology, 

it is important to ensure that New Mexico'.s Water Quality Standards are reflected in the benchmarks for these 

industries in the permit. 

The indicated pollutants (highlighted) in the table above must be changed to reflect New Mexico water quality 

standards for the facilities in New Mexico. 
NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities 

Permit Number NMROSOOOO 

State Certification of the Proposed Permit 

December 10,2013 

EPA defines saline/salt waters as having concentrations greater than or equal to 50 parts per thousand Total 

Dissolved Solids (as discussed on Page 52 of the pennit's proposed fact sheet). Saltwater values may apply to 

certain areas of New Mexico, such as the Pecos Basin below Santa Rosa and the Rio Grande below Elephant 

Butte. These values may also apply to waters that are part of the Colorado River Basin. 

Additionally, the tables below compare EPA's table of hardness-based values to New Mexico water quality 

hardness-based values. The New Mexico values in this table must be included as the applicable benchmark 

values for New Mexico in the Final Pennit. 

EPA VAL UES'd'A Ltste m ~ppen LX J o t e fh Propose dP enntt 

All Units Benchmark Values (mg/L, total) 

.mg!L Cadmium Copper Nickel Silver Zinc 

0-24.99 0.0005 0.0038 0.15 0.0007 0.04 

25-49.99 0.0008 0.0056 0.20 0.0007 0.05 

50-74.99 0.0013 0.0090 0.32 0.0017 0.08 

75-99.99 0.0018 0.0123 0.42 0.0030 0.11 

100-124.99 0.0023 0.0156 0.52 0.0046 0.13 

125-149.99 0.0029 0.0189 0.61 0.0065 0.16 .. 

150-174.99 0.0034 0.0221 0.71 0.0087 0.18 

175-199.99 0.0039 0.0253 0.80 0.0112 0.20 

200-224.99 0.0045 0.0285 0.89 0.0138 0.23 

225-249.99 0.0050 0.0316 0.98 0.0168 0.25 

250+ 0.0053 0.0332 1.02 0.0183 0.26 

NMED VALUES from 20 ... 6 4 900 NMAC 

All I (mg/L, dissolved) 

Units Aluminum Cadmium Copper Lead Nickel Silver Zinc 

mg!L 

25 Acute 0.512 0.00051 0.004 0.014 0.140 0.0003 0.045 

Chronic 0.205 0.00017 0.003 0.001 0.016 0.034 

30 Acute 0.658 0.00059 0.004 0.017 0.170 0.0004 0.054 

Chronic 0.263 0.00019 0.003 0.001 0.019 0.041 

40 Acute 0.975 0.00076 0.006 0.024 0.220 0.0007 0.070 

Chronic 0.391 0.00023 0.004 0.001 0.024 0.053 

50 Acute 1.324 0.00091 0.007 0.030 0.260 0.0010 0.085 

Chronic 0.530 0.00028 0.005 0.001 0.029 0.065 

60 Acute 1.699 0.00107 0.008 0.037 0.300 0.0013 0.101 

Chronic 0.681 0.00031 0.006 0.001 0.034 0.076 

70 Acute 2.099 0.00122 0.010 0.044 0.350 0.0017 0.116 

Chronic 0.84i 0.00035 0.007 0.002 0.038 0.088 

80 Acute 2.520 0.00137 0.011 0.051 0.390 0.0022 0.131 

Chronic 1.010 0.00039 0.007 0.002 0.043 0.099 

90 Acute 2.961 0.00151 0.012 0.058 0.430 0.0027 0.145 

Chronic 1.186 0.00042 0.008 0.002 0.048 0.110 

100 Acute 3.421 0.00165 0.013 0.065 0.470 0.0032 0.160 

Chronic 1.370 0.00045 0.009 0.003 0.052 0.121 

200 Acute 8.838 0.00298 0.026 0.140 0.840 0.011 0.301 

Chronic 3.541 0.00075 0.016 0.005 0.090 0.228 

220 Acute 10.071 
NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities 

Permit Number NMR050000 

Chronic 4.035 

300 Acute 10.071 

Chronic 4.035 

400+ Acute 10.071 

Chronic 4.035 

State Certification of the Proposed Permit 

December 10,2013 

0.00421 O.o38 0.210 1.190 

0.00100 0.023 0.008 0.130 

0.00538 0.050 0.280 1.510 

122 0.029 O.otl 0.170 

0.021 0.435 

0.329 

O.Q35 0.564 

428 

1 Acute vs Chronic applicability: Acute numeric standards shall be attained at the "point of discharge" 

(end-of-pipe) for any discharge to surface water with a designated aquatic life use. 

TSS values will be important for any criteria differences between total and dissolved measurements. 

Condition #2: 

In Part 8 of the proposed MSGP, in sectors G (Metal Mining), H (Coal Mines and Coal Mining-Related 

Facilities), I (Oil and Gas Extraction), and J (Non-Metallic Mineral Mining and Dressing), EPA added language 

at the ''Technology Based Effluent Limits for Clearing, Grading and Excavation Activities" section in each 

sector to mimic the requirements of the 2012 Construction General Permit. 

In NMED's certification of the 2012 CGP, requirements were made which were more stringent as to inspection 

frequencies and timing of inspections and corrective actions required as a result of a rain event. These same 

certification requirements will apply to these sectors mentioned in this condition, as follows: 

Part 8.G.4.4, Part 8.H.4.4., and Part 8.J.4.4 of the permit states: 

For arid or semi-arid regions- You must select, design, and install erosion control measures (e.g., 

degradable rolled erosion control products) with an appropriate seed base to provide erosion control 

for at least three years to achieve 70 percent vegetative cover within 3 years. 

Permittees can only use the option to "select, design, and install erosion control measures (e.g., degradable 

rolled erosion control products) with an appropriate seed base to provide erosion control for at least three 

years to achieve 70 percent vegetative cover within 3 years" in New Mexico as a method for final 

vegetative stabilization for purposes of filing a Notice of Termination (NOT) under the following 

conditions: 

If this option is selected, you must notify NMED at the address listed in Part 9 at the time the NOT is 

submitted to EPA. The information to be submitted includes: 

• A copy of the NOT; 

• Contact information, including individual name or title, address, and phone number for the party 

responsible for implementing the final stabilization measures; and 

• The date that the permanent vegetative stabilization practice was implemented and the projected 

timeframe that the 70% native vegetative cover requirements are expected to be met. (Note that if more 

than three years is required to establish 70 percent of the natural vegetative cover, this technique cannot be 

used or cited for fulfillment of the final stabilization requirement- you remain responsible for 

establishment of final stabilization.) 

NMED also requires that operators periodically (minimum once/year) inspect and properly maintain the 

area until the criteria for final stabilization, as specified in Part 2.2 of the COP, have been met. Operators 

must prepare an inspection report documenting the findings of these inspections and signed in accordance 

with Appendix B.ll. This inspection record must be retained along with the SWPPP for three years after 

the NOT is submitted for the site and additionally submitted to NMED at the address listed in Part 9. 
NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities 

Permit Number NMROSOOOO 

State Certification of the Proposed Permit 

December 10,2013 

The inspections must at a minimum include the following: 

• Observations of all areas of the site disturbed by construction activity; 

• Best Management Practices (BMPs)/post-construction storm water controls must be observed to ensure 

they are effective; 

• An assessment of the status of vegetative re-establishment; and 

• Corrective actions required to ensure vegetative success within three years, and control of pollutants in 

storm water runoff from the site, including implementation dates. 
NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities 

Permit Number NMR050000 

State Certification of tbe Proposed Permit 

December 10,2013 

Comments that are not Conditions of Certification 

Comment#!: 

In Part 8.0.4.1.6, Part 8.H.4.1.6, and Part 8.J.4.1.6, the permit states; 

Exceptions: 

• Arid, semi-arid (if construction occurs during seasonally dry period), or drought-stricken 

areas: 

• Within 14 days of stopping construction work in an area, install any necessary nonvegetative stabilization measures. 

NMED requests that the following language (underlined) be added to clarify timing requirements: 

Within .14 days of stopping construction work in an area but prior to the next rain event, install any 

necessary non-vegetative stabilization measures. 

Comment#2: 

In Part 8.0.4.2.1, Part 8.H.4.2.1, and Part 8.J.4.2.1, NMED requests the following language changes: 

Prohibited Non-Stormwater Discharges: 

Wastewater from washout of concrete, unless ma11aged hy an apprepiate eentrel; 

Wastewater from washout and cleanout of stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds, and other 

construction materials, unletHi managed hy an apprepriate eentl'el~ 

Comment#3: 

NMED is encouraged to note that the MSGP continues to prevent discharges to Tier 3 waters. These waters are 

resources that allow New Mexicans to exercise their full rights under the Clean Water Act for swimmable, 

fishable waters. Protection of these resources must remain a high priority. 

Comment#4: 

During review of the proposed permit, it was noted that the only CERCLA sites listed in Appendix L were for 

sites in Region 10. The definition ofCERCLA sites as given in the proposed permit's fact sheet is referenced 

here: 

" ... afacility as defined in Section 101(9) ofCERCLA, 42 US. C. § 9601 (9), that is undergoing a 

remedial investigation and feasibility study, or for which a Record of Decision for remedial action has been 

issued in accordance with the National Contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R Part 300. This definition includes sites 

that have been listed on the National Priorities List in accordance with Section 105 ofCERCLA, 42 US. C. 

. §9605, or that are being addressed using CERCLA authority, including use of an agreement consistent with the 

SuperfUnd Alternative Approach Guidance. " 

NMED has included a list of the federal CERCLA sites in New Mexico as an attachment to this certification 

(Attachment A). This list must be included in the final permit. 

NMED agrees that stormwater discharges from MSGP sites should not be allowed to interfere with cleanup 

activities at legacy contamination sites. 
Comment#5: 

NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities 

Permit Number NMR050000 

State Certification of the Proposed Permit 

December 10,2013 

In the proposed permit's fact sheet, EPA discusses how certain Green Infrastructure practices may be considered 

Class V UIC wells. If a control measure that qualifies as a Class V well is used in New Mexico, the operator 

must submit a Notice of Intent to NMED's Ground Water Quality Bureau for consideration as to whether .the 

facility must obtain a Discharge Permit for that measure. The NO! can be found at: 

http://www.nmenv.state.nm.us/gwb/FORMS/NewMexicoEnvironmentDepartment-GroundWaterQualityBureauForms.htm. In addition, the language in the permit itself, at Part 2.1.2.6 should note that these additional 

requirements apply. Many operators may not refer to the permit's fact sheet. 

Comment#6: 

In the proposed permit's fact sheet, and at Part 5.1 of the proposed permit, EPA states that if EPA determines 

that a facility's SWPPP is not in compliance with the SWPPP requirements in Part 5.2, then EPA may require 

the SWPPP to be reviewed by a Professional Engineer or a Professional Geologist. NMED would also like to 

suggest that EPA consider the SWPPP review to be conducted by a person with a stormwater-specific 

certification. Although NMED does not endorse any particular certification program, examples of storm water 

certifications include Certified Professional in Storm Water Quality (CPSWQ), Certified Professional in Erosion 

and Sediment Control (CPESC), and Certified Inspector of Sediment and Erosion Control (CISEC), among 

others. 

Comment#7: 

The proposed permit's fact sheet and the proposed permit at Part 5.4 state that the SWPPP must be available at 

the facility in any accessible format. NMED understands that accessible means the SWPPP is available to 

review on site at the time of the inspection. 

Comment#8: 

According to the National Research Council's (NRC) report in 2008, the NRC recommended a tiered approach 

to benchmark monitoring and other requirements for industries covered under this permit. This approach as 

·stated in the proposed permit's fact sheet is as follows (summarized): 

Level No Exposure Visual Monitoring Modeling Stringent 

Certification · Inspections Control 

Measures 

Low Yes, or facilities Yes No No No 

that only have 

galvanized steel ' roof runoff, or . 

other minimal 

loading 

Medium No Yes Yes Yes No 

High No Yes Yes Yes Yes 

Benchmark monitoring requirements have come under scrutiny from many different parties since their inception 

in the 1995 MSGP. According to the benchmark monitoring study included in the docket for this proposed 

permit, out of the 20 facilities that sent their SWPPPs and monitoring data for review (whose material was 

deemed to be reviewable), most had benchmark monitoring exceedances before and after implementing 
NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities 

Permit Number NMR050000 

State Certification of the Proposed Permit 

December 10,2013 

corrective actions in accordance with permit requirements. However, this monitoring is an important, but basic, 

way to determine what pollutants are leaving these industrial sites. 

NMED agrees that tiering should be tied to site conditions. An adequately trained person who is tasked with 

developing the SWPPP for the facility should have an understanding of the types of activities and exposures that 

will contribute to stormwater pollution and should be able to assess the appropriate tiering levels during 

development of the plan. Factors that EPA should consider while developing criteria for determining appropriate 

Tier requirements are as follows: 

• BMPs manufactured/engineered for a specific design storm. i.e., BMPs designed for a 100-year storm 

event may require no benchmark monitoring, but BMPs designed for a 25 year, 24 hour storm event 

should require both visual and benchmark monitoring when discharges occur. 

• Criteria for a facility to qualify for No Exposure Certification should be more discreetly defined. One 

problem that has been identified in the last permit term (with the current NEC guidance) is that if a 

facility erects a roof over a process or storage area outdoors, is that enough to qualify for no exposure? 

• If the facility has the potential to discharge pollutants that are listed as concerns on the most current 

303(d) list, the facility should sample for them regardless of tier level (unless the facility has qualified 

foraNEC). 

• If there is a potential to discharge to a high quality river, the facility should be monitoring their 

discharge with visual and benchmark monitoring. 

• If the facility is implementing Green Infrastructure practices, this should factor into the tier level 

qualification. This could be based on percentage of stormwater runoff that is directed to a GI structure. 

Comment#9: 

In' the proposed permit's fact sheet, EPA discusses the intention to integrate a tool into the eNOl system that will 

automatically determine receiving waters information and impairment status. NMED cannot access the tool and 

therefore cannot verify that the information contained in the tool is correct. NMED notes that frequently, the 

information contained on EPA websites for New Mexico water quality information is incorrect. NMED would 

encourage EPA to discuss with NMED the most efficient way to ensure that the most up-to-date information is 

being used in these determinations. 

Comment#10: 

EPA mentions that a list of all Tier 2 waters in New Mexico will be included as a part of Appendix L to the 

permit. NMED does not have such a list at this current time, but offers the following explanation of Tier 

determinations in New Mexico. From the State of New Mexico Procedures for Assessing Standards Attainment 

for the Integrated §303(d)-§305(b) Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report: Assessment Protocol: 

Tier 1: Tier I waters are determined pollutant-by-pollutant. Tier 1 applies to waters that do not meet but are not 

better than the water quality standards for existing or designated uses. Waters identified as "impaired" for any 

existing or designated use according to the current State of New Mexico Clean Water Act §303(d)-§305(b) 

Integrated List and Report automatically will be Tier I for the pollutant of concern. 

Tier 2: Tier 2 waters are determined pollutant-by-pollutant. Tier 2 applies to waters whose quality is better than 

necessary to protect the CWA Section IOI(a)(2) goals. Tier 2 applies to all classified waters (e.g., identified in 

the New Mexico Water Quality Standards, Sections 101 through 899) that are not designated as Tier 1 on a 

parameter-by-parameter basis or as Tier 3. Tier 2 may apply to unclassified waters on a parameter-by-parameter 

basis depending on the available water quality information. 
NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities 

Permit Number NMR050000 

State Certification of the Proposed Permit 

December 10,2013 

Tier 3: Tier 3 applies to waters that are designated by the Commission as "outstanding national 'resource waters" 

(ONRWs). The Commission designates Tier 3 waters after public notice and comment pursuant to procedures 

established in the New Mexico Water Quality Standards. See 20.6.4.9 NMAC. 

Comment# 13: 

In the proposed permit at Part 1.2.1.2, EPA states that it is possible to receive a waiver to submit a paper NO!. If 

such a waiver is obtained, the permit language should indicate that a paper NO! should also be sent to NMED, 

however, NMED would prefer that the information is simply entered into the NO! tracking system to ensure that 

the information is publicly available. 

Comment#l4: 

NMED would like to see the footnote in Part 5.2.4 of the proposed permit moved to Part 2.1.2 of the final permit 

to facilitate understanding of the requirements as written. Currently there is no explanation for the asterisks in 

that portion of the proposed permit. 
. 

NPDES Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities 

Permit Number NMROSOOOO 

Attachment A: 

Nl •v ,v158591 

"IVIUU" I "OUL I L 

NMD981155930 

State Certification of the Proposed Permit 

December 10,2013 

AT & SF 1r.1 m/1~\ CLOVIS cu~ \Y 

CAL TALS LEMITAR <:>U C. U l"l.t"< U 

(LI"""'"' 

CLEVELAND MILL SILVER CITY GRANT 

NM 

NM 

NM 

NPL 

NPL 

NPL 

Nl 1749980 PI ~A' \/AGE LOS LUNAS \/AI FNr.IA NM n~eiPIPrl 

NPL 

·v~ AT&SF ALBUQUERQUE BERNALILLO NM 

(ALBUOUFRI"\111=\ ~~~~ QUESTA QUESTA TAOS NM ~~~~ f\.111'J.E II'+"~ I 0 Cll 17() I INC Jl N NM 

r.ORP ~~~~ NMD001R?O<;M EAGLE PICHER SOCORRO SOCORRO NM Final 

CAREFREE NPL 

BA" 

l11 FRUIT IIF AI RIIC. JERQUE ILLO NM 

PLUM IE ~~tl NM0007271768 GRANTS GRANTS CIBOLA NM Final 

CHLORINATED NPL 

SOL\ 

"1286 GRIGGS & WA' NUT LAS CRUCES nONA ANA NM Final 

GROUND NPL 

PLUME 

NMD007860935 • fAK_E MILAN CIR()L)I NM ~~~~ ~:::~ 1750020 "'1 u" SAN JUAN INM Final 

I A , I. (I JSoOil NPL 

Mr.r YAND /ELL ( :s NM Final 

~· NPL 

(.;ROI 

PLUME 

~I 'V>vV NORTH RAILROAD ESPANOLA RIO ARRIBA NM Final 

AVENUE PLUME NPL 

Oil~ r-I"U:VVI I I . .,.. , F:Y NM Final 

""'· JED NPL 

REFINERY 

NMD980745558 SOUTH VALLEY ALBUQUERQUE ~~· 10 NM Final 

NPL 

13303 UNITED Nllr.l FAR CHURr.H ROCK IVIC.r\INLEY NM Final 

CORP. NPL