alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-438-CR

DAVID DWAYNE SOUTHARD	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO.1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant David Dwayne Southard appeals from a judgment adjudicating his guilt for the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon2 and sentencing him to three years’ confinement.  In a single point, Southard argues that his sentence violates the doctrine of proportionality and therefore constitutes cruel and unusual punishment as prohibited by both the United States and Texas constitutions. 

	To preserve a complaint for our review, a party must have presented to the trial court a timely request, objection, or motion that states the specific grounds for the desired ruling if they are not apparent from the context of the request, objection, or motion.  Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a)(1); Mosley v. State, 983 S.W.2d 249, 265 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (op. on reh’g), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1070 (1999).  Further, the trial court must have ruled on the request, objection, or motion, either expressly or implicitly, or the complaining party must have objected to the trial court’s refusal to rule.  Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a)(2); Mendez v. State, 138 S.W.3d 334, 341 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).

	Here, Southard did not object to his sentence in the trial court or in a post-trial motion.  The fact that Southard’s argument rests upon the constitutional ground of cruel and unusual punishment does not excuse him of the necessity to preserve error for appellate review.  Stewart v. LaGrand, 526 U.S. 115, 119, 119 S. Ct. 1018, 1020 (1999) (holding that appellant waived Eighth Amendment complaint); Rhoades v. State, 934 S.W.2d 113, 120 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that complaint of cruel and unusual punishment under Texas constitution was waived); Curry v. State, 910 S.W.2d 490, 496 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (stating that constitutional errors may be waived); Wooley v. State, Nos. 02-06-00442-CR, 02-06-00443-CR, 02-06-00444-CR, 2007 WL 3037932, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 18, 2007, pet. dism’d, untimely filed) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (holding that appellant waived claim of disproportionate sentence by not objecting after sentence was imposed, in a motion for new trial, or in any other post-verdict motion); Crawford v. State, No. 02-04-00299-CR, 2005 WL 1477958, at *4 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 23, 2005, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (same).  Southard, therefore, has forefeited any complaint that his sentence is disproportionate or constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.  See Stewart, 526 U.S. at 119, 119 S. Ct. at 1020; Rhoades, 934 S.W.2d at 120; Curry, 910 S.W.2d at 496 n.2; Wooley, 2007 WL 3037932, at *1; Crawford, 2005 WL 1477958, at *4.  Accordingly, we overrule Southard’s sole point and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: November 25, 2009
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03997

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03997\03997_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03997\03997_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03997\03997_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03997\03997_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03997\03997_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03997\03997_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03997\03997_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03997\03997_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03997\03997_PartF.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03997\03997_PartG.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03997\03997_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03997\Certification Statement Plant ID_03997.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03997\Supporting Documentation\03997_aerial.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03997\Supporting Documentation\PETE.Plant Water Balance.Units 1&2.Drawing No.008-00-6-M-F-26C.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
1

Kaufman Engineering, Inc.

1444 E Lackawanna Ave

Olyphant PA, 18447

cdrzewiecki@kaufmaneng.net

April 4, 2016

FAA

Docket Management Facility

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam,

The purpose of this document is to supplement the petition for exemption of Section 333 by Kaufman 

Engineering Inc. (FAA Docket Number – FAA-2015-6740) in response to the FAA’s request for further 

information (dated March 24. 2016) to meet the requirments of § 11.81.

Reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest (§ 11.81(d))

By granting Kaufman Engineering, Inc.’s current request for exemption from Section 333 (FAA-2015-6740), 

the public as a whole would benefit. Granting the petition would further public interest by allowing 

Kaufman Engineering, Inc. to safely, efficiently, and economically perform commercial aerial data 

acquisition within the National Airspace System in support of government agencies and private industry 

alike. Kaufman Engineering, Inc. has long standing relationships with multiple private companies and 

governmental agencies in the state of Pennsylvania, New York, Maryland, West Virginia and several other 

states whose operations could greatly benefit from the services Kaufman Engineering, Inc. proposes to 

provide (aerial topographic surveys, aerial photography, aerial videography, etc.). The employment of 

these services would be a great asset to the local economies surrounding these operations due to 

increased productivity provided by the proposed work products of Kaufman Engineering, Inc. Kaufman 

Engineering, Inc.‘s use of UAS would directly benefit the National Airspace System by reducing pollution 
2

and congestion. Kaufman Engineering, Inc.’s proposed UAS operations would provide an efficient way to 

gather large amounts of data in an economical fashion, as compared to traditional manned aerial data 

collection techniques and systems. It is noteworthy that Kaufman Engineering, Inc.’s proposed UAS

operations would be realized without implicating any privacy or safety issues.

Additional information, views, or arguments to support Kaufman Engineering, Inc.’s request (§ 11.81(g))

This petition (FAA-2015-6740) is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) 

Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operate safely in 

the National Airspace System. As such, Kaufman Engineering, Inc.’s request for exemption may be granted 

pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth in the original petition (FAA2015-6740) written on behalf of Kaufman Engineering, Inc.

Kaufman Engineering, Inc. feels that, as discussed above and in its original document, it will operate its UAS 

safely in the National Airspace System in such a way as to not create a hazard to the National Airspace 

System, the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The U.S. Army Military District of Washington presents spirit of America Capital Centre, June 14 - 8 PM, June 15 - 8 PM, June 16 - 2 PM & 8 PM, June 17 - 2 PM & 6 PM: featuring the 3d U.S. Infantry (The Old Guard), the U.S. Army band and chorus (Preshing'

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The U.S. Army Military District of Washington presents spirit of America Capital Centre, June 14 - 8 PM, June 15 - 8 PM, June 16 - 2 PM & 8 PM, June 17 - 2 PM & 6 PM: featuring the 3d U.S. Infantry (The Old Guard), the U.S. Army band and chorus (Preshing's Own) 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  The District 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Army 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  District of Columbia 
                    -           Town        
                    -  Washington 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  141 × 31 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  021742188.jpg; 021742188.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7333]



[[Page 19474]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Realistic Bomber Training Initiative

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Record of decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 20, 2007, the United States Air Force signed a Record 
of Decision for the Realistic Bomber Training Initiative Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement. This decision was based on information, 
analysis, and public comments contained in both the Environmental 
Impact Statement for the Realistic Bomber Training Initiative (Federal 
Register Notice of Availability February 4, 2000) and the Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Realistic Bomber Training 
Initiative (Federal Register Notice of Availability published August 
11, 2006), along with other relevant factors. After carefully 
considering the issues addressed in the Supplemental Environmental 
Impact Statement and the comments submitted, the Air Force decided not 
to change the decision described in the initial Record of Decision and 
to continue implementation of Alternative B of the Realistic Bomber 
Training Initiative. This alternative includes the use of appropriate 
training assets associated with Instrument Route IR-178/Lancer Military 
Operations Area. As indicated above, a Notice of Availability of the 
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement was published in the 
Federal Register on August 11, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 155, Page 
46220). The required 30-day waiting period for a Record of Decision has 
been completed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheryl K. Parker, Headquarters Air 
Combat Command, A7ZP/Comprehensive Planning Branch, 129 Andrews St., 
Suite 102, Langley AFB, VA 23655 or call (757) 764-9334.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-7333 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
Exhibit 34.2  LOGO Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Managers of C-III Capital Partners LLC, the Sole Member of C-III Asset Management LLC: We have examined management of C-III Asset Management LLCs (the Company) assertion that the
Company complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the
Platform), excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(i)  1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB Servicing Criteria dated January 31, 2019 as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. The Companys management is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the specified
requirements based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether managements assertion
about compliance with the specified requirements is fairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether managements assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. The
nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of managements assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Companys compliance with the specified requirements. In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB Servicing Criteria dated January 31, 2019 as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2018 is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLPAsheville, North CarolinaJanuary 31, 2019
No. 108 

1960 

RELEASE, BROWSE DAMAGE, AND GROWTH 

OF YOUNG WHITE PINES 

Exactly what happens to young white pine seedlings 

that have been released from hardwood competition and allowed to grow, subject to browse damage, for a 7-year period? 

Some indications of the results of such treatment can be 

seen from recent work on the Massabesic Experimental Forest 

in Maine. 

A study of the effect of hardwood competition on 

white pine was started in 1952 and ended in 1958. Fouryear-old white pine seedlings were released by cutting all 

other trees and shrubs closer to the pine than a distance 

equal to their height. This release was maintained for 

the first 3 years. Briefly, results can be summed up this 

way : 

- Check Released 

trees trees 

t t 

The study provided ... 60 and 60. 

But the identity of ... 11 and 3 ... was lost by 1958. 

So this left .......... 49 and 57 ... for the study. 

Browsing damage to .... 27 and 18 ... was severe. 

In fact, .............. 16 and 7 .. .died as the result. 

BY 1958, only ......... 6 and 13 ... were not damaged. 

Consequently, only .... 22 and 39 .. .were available for 
comparison of growth after release (and two-thirds of these 

a 

had some browse damage). During the study period, most of 

the hardwoods around seven of the check trees were killed by 

scale insects. This released these pines from their former 

competitors. In addition, one released tree was partially 

broken at the ground line by snow. 

When the broken tree is eliminated, and the 22 check 

trees are separated into two groups, the 15 remaining overtopped and the 7 naturally released, the following growth 

comparisons are possible: 

Average annual 

height growth was ...... 

Average annual 

height growth was ...... 

Average tot a1 

height growth was ...... 

Aver age annual 

diameter growth1 was . . . 

Average annual 

diameter growth was . . . . 

Average total 

diameter growth was .... 

- Over - 

topped 

check 

- trees - trees 

Released 

trees 

(1952-54) - * - 

15 7 and 38 trees: 

7.7 10.7 and 8.9 inches, 1952-1954 

5.2 9.3 and 11.7 inches, 1955-1958 

44 69 and 74 inches for 7 years. 

.06 .11 and .12 inches, 1952-1954. 

.06 .16 and .23 inches, 1955-1958. 

.4 1.0 and 1.3 inches for 7 years. 

It has been generally accepted that young white pine 

respond to release. This study shows that, in addition, released trees are better able to recover after severe browsing. Some trees become released naturally, but in this 

study only one-third of the trees were so released in 6 

years. In summary, when pine stocking is light and there is 

hardwood competition, with strong possibilities of browse 

damage, release is desirable to maintain a good proportion 

of the species as well as to increase growth xate. 

Massabesic Experimental Forest 

Northeastern Forest Experiment Station 

Forest Service, U.S. Dept. Agriculture 

'~iarneter growth was measured about an inch from the ground.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9227 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to extend to matter left for collection 

by private or commercial interstate carriers the same protections as 

matter carried throughout the country as interstate or foreign commerce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. PHILLIPS (for himself, Mr. ALLRED, Mr. COSTA, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. 

GARAMENDI, Mr. HORSFORD, Ms. HOULAHAN, Ms. LEE of Nevada, Mr. 

PANETTA, Mr. PETERS, Ms. PORTER, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. 

FLEISCHMANN, Mrs. KIM of California, Mr. LATURNER, Mr. SMUCKER, 

Mrs. STEEL, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. TIMMONS, Ms. VAN DUYNE, and Mr. VAN

DREW) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to extend to matter 

left for collection by private or commercial interstate 

carriers the same protections as matter carried throughout the country as interstate or foreign commerce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Porch Pirates Act of 

5 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9227 IH

1 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

2 It is the sense of Congress that Congress has the au3 thority to extend to matters left for collection by private 

4 or commercial interstate carriers the same protections as 

5 matter carried through the country as interstate or foreign 

6 commerce. 

7 SEC. 3. PRIVATE OR COMMERCIAL INTERSTATE CARRIER 

8 PROTECTIONS. 

9 (a) OBSTRUCTION OF MATTER LEFT FOR COLLEC10 TION.—Section 659 of title 18, United States Code, is 

11 amended— 

12 (1) at the end of the fourth paragraph, by 

13 striking ‘‘—’’ and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

14 (2) by inserting after paragraph four the fol15 lowing new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘Whoever embezzles, steals, or unlawfully takes, car17 ries away, or by fraud or deception obtains, any package, 

18 or other article, which has been delivered by any private 

19 or commercial interstate carrier before the addressee or 

20 his or her agent has taken physical possession—’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# USN-USMC aviation WWII

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  USN-USMC aviation WWII 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Forces Command. Directorate of Public Affairs 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Forces Command. Directorate of Public Affairs 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of Defense 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  FORSCOM poster ; 133 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  index.cpd 

Part of: USN-USMC aviation WWII (2 objects)     Next

USN-USMC aviation WWII

USN-USMC aviation WWII

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -