alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 9,903.

#### MUIR v. JENKINS.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 18.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1810.

Notes — Negotiability—Actios by Holder.

The indorsee of a promissory note, not payable to order, but expressed to be “negotiable at the Bank of Discount and Deposit,” may maintain an action upon it in his own name, against -the maker.

[Cited in Bank of Sherman v. Apperson, 4 Fed. 29.]

Jenkins made a note for $250, payable to Stebbins, without the words “or order,” but made “negotiable at the Bank of Discount and Deposit.” Stebbins indorsed it to the plaintiff. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and a motion in arrest of judgment, by Caldwell & Porter, the defendant’s counsel.

Mr. Jones, for plaintiff,

contended that a promissory note, without the words “or order,” is a note within the statute of Anne, so as to enable the payee to maintain an action thereon under the statute. That if it is a note within the statute for one purpose, it is so for all other purposes; and that therefore an indorsee of a note, not payable to order, may maintain an action in his own name under the statute. Nicholson v. Sedgwick, 1 Ld. Raym. 180; Burchell v. Sloeock, 2 Ld. Raym. 1545; Smith v. Kendall, 6 Term R. 123; Chit Bills, 48, 108; Gibson v. Minet, 1 H. Bl. 569, 3 Term. R. 481; Tatlock v. Harris, 3 Term R. 174.

Caldwell & Porter, for defendant,

cited Carlos v. Fancourt, 5 Term R. 482; Hodges v. Steward, 1 Salk. 125; Hill v. Lewis, Id. 133: Nicholson v. Sedgwick, 1 Ld. Raym. 180; Chit. Bills, 48; Imp. Mod. Pleader, 390; and contended that the words “negotiable at the Bank of Discount and Deposit at Washington,” only confine the negotiability of the *957note to that place, or make it payable out of a particular fund; that promissory notes are put upon the same footing as inland bills; and that an inland bill, not payable to order, is not negotiable. They cited also, Smith y. Kendall, 6 Term R. 123; Banbury y. Lisset, 2 Strange, 1211; Chamberlyn v. Delarive, 2 Wils. 353; Dawkes y. De Lorane, 3 Wils. 207; Chit. Bills, 174; Evans, Bills, 139; Kyd, 34, 35, G3, 9G, 97; Esp. 2G.

Mr. Morsell, for plaintiff, in reply,

cited Roberts v. Peake, 1 Burrows, 323, where the note was not payable to order, and was only payable upon an uncertain contingency; and the court decided that it was not a negotiable note, because the contingency was uncertain, without noticing the objection that it was not payable to order.

The COURT

(CRANCH, Chief Judge, contra)

overruled the motion in arrest, and rendered judgment for the plaintiff, on the ground that it was the intention of the defendant to make a negotiable instrument.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Understanding taxes

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Understanding taxes 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Publication ; 1042; Publication (United States. Internal Revenue Service) ; 1042. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  175 × 36 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  029563107.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-CR-070

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

OLGA GONZALEZ GONZALEZ, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On April 10, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to an

Information charging her with unlawful reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1326(a). 

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived her right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of her right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00070-GCS Doc #: 22 Filed: 05/01/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of unlawful

reentry of a deported alien. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00070-GCS Doc #: 22 Filed: 05/01/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# Official Journal L 267/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 267 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5930 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 267

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5930 September 2016

---

| Contents | | Corrigenda | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ( OJ L 341, 24.12.2015 ) | 1 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code ( OJ L 269, 10.10.2013 ) | 2 |

Contents

Corrigenda

page

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ( OJ L 341, 24.12.2015 )

( OJ L 341, 24.12.2015 )

1

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code ( OJ L 269, 10.10.2013 )

( OJ L 269, 10.10.2013 )

2

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
110 STAT. 3168 PUBLIC LAW 104–254—OCT. 9, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2695:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–509 (Comm. on Commerce).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Apr. 16, considered and passed House.

Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–254

104th Congress

An Act

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction

of certain hydroelectric projects in the State of Pennsylvania.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), upon the request

of the licensee for the project concerned, and after reasonable notice,

the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall, in accordance

with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements

of such section 13 and the Commission’s procedures under such

section, extend the time required for commencement of construction

of each the following projects until September 26, 1999:

(1) FERC Project No. 4474.

(2) FERC Project No. 7041.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect for the

project upon the expiration of the extension (issued by the Commission under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806))

of the period required for commencement of construction of the

project concerned.

Approved October 9, 1996.

Oct. 9, 1996

[H.R. 2695]
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2010-3
Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and



5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: DealerTrack Collateral Management Services
and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.





Date: June 26, 2012







/s/ Paul C. Honda






Paul C. Honda
Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Compliance Officer
of American Honda Finance Corporation
(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
(Reap. Dec. 9309)

#### American Express Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 20492.

(Decided February 3, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*480Lawrence, Judge:

When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 18 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 18

 Commemorating the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz 
                     extermination camp in Poland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2005

 Mr. Talent (for himself, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Frist, Mrs. Dole, 
 Mr. Dodd, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Levin, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Alexander, Mr. 
    Voinovich, Mr. Coleman, and Mr. Hagel) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commemorating the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz 
                     extermination camp in Poland.

Whereas on January 27, 1945, the Auschwitz extermination camp in Poland was 
        liberated by Allied Forces during World War II after almost 5 years of 
        murder, rape, and torture;
Whereas more than 1,000,000 innocent civilians were murdered at the Auschwitz 
        extermination camp;
Whereas the Auschwitz extermination camp symbolizes the brutality of the 
        Holocaust;
Whereas Americans must never forget the terrible crimes against humanity 
        committed at the Auschwitz extermination camp and must educate future 
        generations to promote understanding of the dangers of intolerance in 
        order to prevent similar injustices from happening again; and
Whereas commemoration of the liberation of the Auschwitz extermination camp will 
        instill in all Americans a greater awareness of the Holocaust: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commemorates January 27, 2005, as the 60th anniversary 
        of the liberation of the Auschwitz extermination camp by Allied 
        Forces during World War II; and
            (2) calls on all Americans to remember the more than 
        1,000,000 innocent victims murdered at the Auschwitz 
        extermination camp as part of the Holocaust.
                                 <all>
```
No. 62022.

#### Lissco Trading Corp. and Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 321892-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil, packed in tins, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnold Sorensin Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ANASTACIO C. BILLONES, Chief Boatswain’s Mate, U. S. Navy, Appellant

15 USCMA 493, 35 CMR 465

No. 18,713

July 23, 1965

*Fred W. Shields, Esquire,*and *Lieutenant John P. Meade,*USNR, were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Major Daniel F. McConnell,*USMC, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Tried by general court-martial and convicted, among other things, of an Additional Charge and specification of larceny, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 10 USC *494§ 921, the accused was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for ten years, and reduction. Intermediate appellate authorities, reducing the adjudged term of imprisonment to four years, have otherwise affirmed.

Examination of the record reveals that the law officer failed to instruct the court-martial on the elements of the offense alleged in the Additional Charge and specification. Such was prejudicial error. United States v Keith, 1 USCMA 442, 4 CMR 34; United States v Shepard, 1 USCMA 487, 4 CMR 79; United States v Walters, 10 USCMA 598, 28 CMR 164.

The petition for review is granted. The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The board may reassess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty or order a rehearing on the Additional Charge and specification and the penalty.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as required by

Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Marc Voigt, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Prima BioMed Ltd (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended June 30, 2014, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 13.1 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                   
|----------------------- |  | ------------------
|Date:                   |  | September 24, 2014
|                       
|/s/ Marc Voigt         
|Marc Voigt             
|Chief Executive Officer
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Prima BioMed Ltd under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 75 (Thursday, April 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-894]


Certain Tissue Paper Products from the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of First 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 19, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristina Horgan or Bobby Wong, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
8173 or (202) 482-0409, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 9, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of this 
antidumping duty administrative review. See Certain Tissue Paper 
Products from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 17477 (April 09, 2007).

Extension of Time Limits for Final Results

    Pursuant to Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), and section 351.213(h)(1) of the Department's 
regulations, the Department shall issue the final results of review 
within 120 days after the date on which the notice of the preliminary 
results was published in the Federal Register. However, if the 
Department determines that it is not practicable to complete the review 
within this time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section 
351.213(h)(2) of the Department's regulations allow the Department to 
extend this time period to 180 days.
    In the instant review, the Department finds that the current 
deadline for the final results is impracticable. Specifically, the 
Department requires additional time to conduct verifications of the 
exporters and their producers and to review and analyze interested 
party comments, including issues involving alleged third-country 
shipments of subject merchandise. As a result, the Department has 
determined to extend the current time limits of this administrative 
review. For these reasons, the Department is fully extending the time 
limit for the completion of these final results until no later than 
Tuesday, October 9, 2007, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: April 12, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-7452 Filed 4-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S