alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 47518.

#### Protests 935121-G, etc., of Geo. Abeling & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the testimony showed that due to a shipping strike at the port of entry (San Francisco), there were no facilities for handling the merchandise upon the wharves because of the congestion. A conference was held between the importer and the customs officials to determine the course of procedure to adopt under the circumstances and it was agreed, inasmuch as a dock examination was impossible, that the cases be taken under customs seal to the importer’s warehouse for examination; that the seals be broken there, the cases opened, and the glass examined; that when all of the breakage was determined the customs officials would make their final report; that the entries were to be withheld until the final report of breakage was filed; and that no credit would be given the customers of the importer for breakage until the amounts had been approved by the customs officials. Several of the witnesses testifying at the trial were those present at the conference. When this final report of breakage was' received, the importer testified he turned it over to one of the examiners.

Attached to the appraiser’s letter requesting an investigation appeared copies of two reports of breakage, which were received in evidence as exhibits 4 and 5. The customs agent made an investigation and several exhibits were received in evidence in connection therewith. It appeared that an error in computation was discovered in one of the exhibits. A stipulation was entered into between counsel correcting the error in exhibit 5. It appeared that upon examination by the interested parties considerable broken glass was found and that because of congestion in the importer’s warehouse, it was agreed between the parties that an estimate of the quantity of damage could be made. Therefore, the broken glass was not weighed. The report furnished by the importer was considered correct and that, in comparison with other shipments, the damage reported here was found to be commensurate with the Government’s estimate, and therefore the customs officials agreed with the importer to allow the damage reported on these *406shipments the same as on other shipments. But, however, through an oversight, the invoices were returned prior to receipt of the report from the importer showing the amount of damage.

From all of the evidence produced the court was of the opinion it was -clearly established that it was not possible to comply with any regulations respecting the examination of merchandise upon the wharf.

On the record presented the court directed the collector to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the weights returned, due allowance being made for breakage found by the examiners and reported in certain memoranda from the importer, as amended by agreement of counsel.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 22 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 22

  Proclaiming Casimir Pulaski to be an honorary citizen of the United 
                          States posthumously.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2005

 Mr. Durbin (for himself, Ms. Mikulski, and Ms. Murkowski) introduced 
 the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proclaiming Casimir Pulaski to be an honorary citizen of the United 
                          States posthumously.

Whereas Casimir Pulaski was a Polish military officer who fought on the side of 
        America against the British in the American Revolutionary War;
Whereas Benjamin Franklin recommended that General George Washington accept 
        Casimir Pulaski as a volunteer in the American Cavalry and said that 
        Pulaski was ``renowned throughout Europe for the courage and bravery he 
        displayed in defense of his country's freedom'';
Whereas after arriving in America, Casimir Pulaski wrote these words to General 
        Washington, ``I came here, where freedom is being defended, to serve it, 
        and to live or die for it'';
Whereas the first military engagement of Casimir Pulaski with the British was on 
        September 11, 1777, at the Battle of Brandywine, and his courageous 
        charge in this engagement averted a disastrous defeat of the American 
        Cavalry and saved the life of George Washington;
Whereas on September 15, 1777, George Washington elevated Casimir Pulaski to the 
        rank of Brigadier General of the American Cavalry;
Whereas Casimir Pulaski formed the Pulaski Cavalry Legion, and in February 1779, 
        this legion ejected the British occupiers from Charleston, South 
        Carolina;
Whereas in October 1779, Casimir Pulaski mounted an assault against British 
        forces in Savannah, Georgia;
Whereas on the morning of October 9, 1779, Casimir Pulaski was mortally wounded 
        and was taken aboard the American ship USS Wasp, where he died at sea on 
        October 11, 1779;
Whereas before the end of 1779, the Continental Congress resolved that a 
        monument should be erected in honor of Casimir Pulaski;
Whereas in 1825, General Lafayette laid the cornerstone for the Casimir Pulaski 
        monument in Savannah, Georgia; and
Whereas in 1929, Congress passed a resolution recognizing October 11 of each 
        year as Pulaski Day in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Casimir Pulaski is 
proclaimed to be an honorary citizen of the United States posthumously.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.8**

 
|                                                                                    | FAX (303)   623-4258 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| 621 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 1550   DENVER, COLORADO 80293 TELEPHONE (303)623-9147 |

 

CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

 

We have issued our report dated February 27, 2017 on estimates of proved reserves, future production and income attributable to certain royalty interests of Rivercrest Royalties, LLC, as of December 31, 2016. As independent oil and gas consultants, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our report and the information contained therein and information from our prior reserve reports referenced in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP and to all references to our firm in this Annual Report.

 
|   | \s\ Ryder Scott   Company, L.P.          |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   | **RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.**            |
|   | TBPE Firm Registration   No. F-1580 |

 

Denver, Colorado

 

March 30, 2017

 

----
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 54 

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding a commemorative postage stamp 

honoring Jasper Francis Cropsey, the famous Staten Island-born 19th 

Century Hudson River Painter. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding a commemorative 

postage stamp honoring Jasper Francis Cropsey, the famous Staten Island-born 19th Century Hudson River 

Painter. 

Whereas Jasper Francis Cropsey was born on February 18, 

1823, in Rossville, Staten Island, New York to Jacob 

Cropsey and Elizabeth Hilyer Cortelyou; 

Whereas Jasper Francis Cropsey was a famous second generation 19th Century Hudson River Valley Painter, and 

became known as America’s ‘‘Painter of Autumn’’ after 

his vibrant depiction of Autumn on the Hudson River 

was unveiled in London in 1860; 

Whereas Jasper Francis Cropsey contributed greatly to the 

Hudson River Valley, Staten Island, and the United 
2 

•SCON 54 IS

States through his artistic and architectural talent by 

producing, throughout his lifetime, more than 1,300 oil 

paintings, 400 water colors, and numerous architectural 

drawings; and 

Whereas Jasper Francis Cropsey admired the work of Thomas Cole and other American landscape painters and he 

believed in the natural unspoiled beauty of the United 

States, depicting serene landscapes of man’s peaceful coexistence with nature and harmonious American naturalism: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be 

4 issued by the United States Postal Service honoring 

5 Jasper Francis Cropsey, the famous Staten Island6 born 19th Century Hudson River Painter; and 

7 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

8 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

9 such a stamp be issued. 

Æ
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. KIL JUN LEE,

De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt. No. 13-50422

D.C . No. 2:12-c r-00278-DDP-1 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia De a n D. Pre ge rson, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Argue d a nd Subm itte d July

5, 2016 Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : M UR G UIA, a

nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s, a nd B OLTON, ** Distric t Judge . Kil Jun Le e a

ppe a ls his c onvic tions a

nd se nte nc e s for thre e c ounts of tra ffic king in c ounte rfe it goods in viola tion of 18 U.S.C . § 2320(a), c onte nding tha t the c onvic tions a

nd se nte n c e s we re m

u ltiplic itous with his c onvic t ions a nd 

# FIL ED JUL 22 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3. ** The Honora

ble Susa n R . B olton, Unite d State s Distric t Judge for the Distric t of Ariz ona , sitting by de signa tion.se nte nc e s for thre e c ounts of sm uggling the

sa m e goods unde r 18 U.S.C . § 545. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm

a s m odifie d. The two se ts of c ha

rge s ste m m e d from the sa m e c onduc t : bringing c ounte rfe it se xua l dy s func tion pills into the Unite d Stat e s. W

h ile se c tions 2320(a

) and 545 a re not by the ir te rm s m

ultiplic itous, he re the jury wa s instruc te d tha

t a n e le m e nt of guilt unde

r § 545 wa s the viola

tion of § 2320(a

). As a re sult, thejury instruc tions tre ate d tra ffic king in c ounte rfe it goods under § 2320(a ) a s a le sse r inc l ude d offe nse of sm

uggling under § 545. Thejury found Le e guilty

of both se ts of c ha rge s, a nd the distric t c ourt e nte re d judgm e nt on both sets. While the gove rnm e nt c an indic t a de fe nda nt for both a

gre ate r and a

le sse r inc l ude d offe nse , “ e nte ring judgm e nt a ga inst him is m ultiplic itous a

nd a double je opa rdy viola t ion whe n it is ba se d on thesa m e c onduc t.” Unite d State s v . Sc hale s , 546 F.3d 965, 978 (9th C ir. 2008). This c o nstitute d pla in e rror. Se e id. at 980. W e the re fore strike from the judgm e nt the tra ffic king c onvic tions a nd se nte nc e s on c ounts 1, 3, a nd 5, inc luding the$300 in spe c ia l a sse ssm e nts for those c ounts, a nd a ffirm the j udgm e nt a s m odifie d . Se e Unite d State s v . Long , 301 F.3d 1095, 1108 (9th C ir. 2002). AFFIRM E D as M O DIFIE D

2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Christopher E. Ash, Sr., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. Case No. 2:11-cv-135

Michael J. Astrue, JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

Commissioner of Magistrate Judge Kemp

Social Security, 

 

Defendant. 

ORDER

 This case is before the Court to consider a Report and Recommendation issued by the

Magistrate Judge on April 17, 2012. The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections

have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report

and Recommendation. The plaintiff’s statement of errors is SUSTAINED. This case is

remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g), sentence

four.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

Algenon L. Marbley

United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cv-00135-ALM-TPK Doc #: 23 Filed: 06/15/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2009016EN.01002201.xml

| 22.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/22

---

Call for proposals under the work programme ‘People’ of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

(2009/C 16/07)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the work programme ‘People’ of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call concerning trans-national operation of the EURAXESS Services Network. The call deadline and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website.

EURAXESS Services

People Specific Programme:

| Call Identifier | : | FP7-PEOPLE-2009-EURAXESS |
| --- | --- | --- |

Call Identifier

:

FP7-PEOPLE-2009-EURAXESS

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2008) 4483 of 22 August 2008.

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2008) 4483 of 22 August 2008.

Information on the modalities of the call, the work programme, and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Zayo Group, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ken desGarennes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 15, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Ken desGarennes    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Ken desGarennes        
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
No. 56606.

protest 164604-K (A) (Los Angeles).

#### Morris P. Kirk & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6641
ROBERT LEE GAMBLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PARKER EVATT; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-94-2193-6-19AK) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Gamble, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant a certificate of probable cause to appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gamble v. Evatt , No. CA-94-2193-6-19AK (D.S.C. Apr. 13, 1995). We, however, modify the district court's order to reflect that its dismissal should have been with pr ejudice. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 28 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 28

  Approving the location of the commemorative work in the District of 
        Columbia honoring former President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2006

 Mr. Stevens (for himself, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Reed, and Mr. 
 Brownback) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Approving the location of the commemorative work in the District of 
        Columbia honoring former President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code provides that the 
        location of a commemorative work in the area described as Area I shall 
        be deemed authorized only if approved by law not later than 150 days 
        after notification to Congress and others that the commemorative work 
        may be located in Area I;
Whereas section 8162 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2000 (40 
        U.S.C. 8903 note) authorizes the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial 
        Commission to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of 
        Columbia to honor Dwight D. Eisenhower; and
Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress of her determination 
        that the memorial should be located in Area I: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the location of the 
commemorative work to honor Dwight D. Eisenhower, authorized by section 
8162 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2000 (40 U.S.C. 
8903 note), within Area I as depicted on the map referred to in section 
8908(a) of title 40, United States Code, is approved.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 07, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 07, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0082. GLORIA MANCIA v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 161515
Exhibit 35.1







Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon,
as Trustee.

I, James W. P. Hall, Vice President of The Bank of New
York Mellon, a New York corporation (the “Trustee”), states:

(a) A review of the Trustee’s activities for the period
from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Trustee’s performance under
the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated July 15, 2010 between MS Structured Asset Corp. as depositor (the “Depositor”)
and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary, in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor and
the Trustee (as amended in each such case, the “Trust Agreement”), has been made under my supervision.

(b) To the best of my knowledge and based on such review,
the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period
for Floating Rate Trust Series 2010-04 (IP), except for the non-material noncompliance noted below:

|• |  | With respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), non-compliance was identified
in connection with the SATURNS Floating Rate Trust Series 2010-04 (IP) transactions related to the filing of one 10-D report.
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee



|Date: February 28, 2020 |  | By: /s/ James W. P. Hall
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                        |  | Name: James W. P. Hall  
|                        |  | Title:   Vice President
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended December 26, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter
ended December 26, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Transcat, Inc.
 Date:  February 8, 2010
    /s/ Charles P. HadeedCharles P. HadeedChief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating OfficerDate:  February 8, 2010
    /s/ John J. ZimmerJohn J. ZimmerVice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
No. 47514.

#### Protest 965775-G of W. J. Byrnes *&*Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When this protest was called for trial 'there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiffs. The papers disclosed nothing to .overcome the presumption of ¡correctness .attaching to the collector^ action. The protest was therefore overruled.
```

[104th Congress Public Law 209]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ209.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 3010]]

Public Law 104-209
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain interests 
   in Waihee Marsh for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge 
             Complex. <<NOTE: Oct. 1, 1996 -  [H.R. 1772]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Hawaii.>> 

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 16 USC 668dd note.>> AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE INTERESTS 
            FOR INCLUSION IN THE OAHU NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX.

    (a) Authority to Acquire.--The Secretary of the Interior
may acquire, for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 
the area known as the Waihee Marsh, located on the northeast coast of 
the Island of Oahu, Hawaii, consisting of approximately 36 acres (as 
determined by the Secretary) along both sides of Kamehameha Highway.
    (b) Management of Acquired Interests.--Lands and interests acquired 
by the United States under this section shall be managed by the 
Secretary of the Interior as part of the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge 
Complex.

    Approved October 1, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1772:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-528 (Comm. on Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):
            Apr. 23, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 18, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```