Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 71 / Friday, April 13, 2007 / Notices 18629 

Background 

On January 31, 2007, the Department 

published in the Federal Register its 

preliminary results of new shipper 

review of forged stainless steel flanges 

from India for the period February 1, 

2005, through January 31, 2006. See 

Preliminary Results. No party 

commented on the preliminary results. 

Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order 

The products covered by this order 

are certain forged stainless steel flanges, 

both finished and not finished, 

generally manufactured to specification 

ASTM A–182, and made in alloys such 

as 304, 304L, 316, and 316L. The scope 

includes five general types of flanges. 

They are weld–neck, used for butt–weld 

line connection; threaded, used for 

threaded line connections; slip–on and 

lap joint, used with stub–ends/butt–

weld line connections; socket weld, 

used to fit pipe into a machined 

recession; and blind, used to seal off a 

line. The sizes of the flanges within the 

scope range generally from one to six 

inches; however, all sizes of the above–

described merchandise are included in 

the scope. Specifically excluded from 

the scope of this order are cast stainless 

steel flanges. Cast stainless steel flanges 

generally are manufactured to 

specification ASTM A–351. The flanges 

subject to this order are currently 

classifiable under subheadings 

7307.21.1000 and 7307.21.5000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

under review is dispositive of whether 

or not the merchandise is covered by the 

scope of the order. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

As noted above, no parties 

commented on the preliminary results. 

The Department is making no changes 

to its preliminary analysis. 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of our review, we 

determine that a weighted–average 

dumping margin of 1.52 percent exists 

for Kunj for the period February 1, 2005, 

through January 31, 2006. 

Assessment Rates 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 

1930 (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

The Department calculated importer–

specific duty assessment rates (or, when 

the importer was unknown by the 

respondent, customer–specific duty 

assessment rates) on the basis of the 

ratio of the total amount of antidumping 

duties calculated for the examined sales 

observations involving each importer (or 

customer, when appropriate) to the total 

entered value of the examined sales 

observations for that importer (or 

customer, when appropriate). We intend 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

15 days after the date of publication of 

these final results of review. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by companies 

included in these final results of review 

for which the reviewed companies did 

not know the merchandise was destined 

for the United States. In such instances, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all–others rate 

if there is no rate for an intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. For a discussion of this 

clarification, see Notice of Policy 

Concerning Assessment of Antidumping 

Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of 

this notice of final results of new 

shipper review for all shipments of 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication, 

as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the 

Tariff Act: (1) the cash deposit rates for 

Kunj (i.e., the subject merchandise both 

manufactured and exported by Kunj) 

will be 1.52 percent; (2) the cash deposit 

rate for exporters who received a rate in 

a prior segment of the proceeding will 

continue to be the rate assigned in that 

segment of the proceeding; (3) the cash 

deposit rate for entries of subject 

merchandise exported by Kunj but not 

manufactured by Kunj will continue to 

be the ‘‘All Others’’ rate (i.e., 162.14 

percent) or the rate applicable to the 

manufacturer, if so established; and (4) 

if neither the exporter nor the 

manufacturer is a firm covered in this 

review, or a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will be 

162.14 percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate 

established in the less–than-fair–value 

investigation. See Amended Final 

Determination and Antidumping Duty 

Order; Certain Forged Stainless Steel 

Flanges from India; 59 FR 5994 

(February 9, 1994). These cash deposit 

requirements shall remain in effect until 

publication of the final results of the 

next administrative review. There are no 

changes to the rates applicable to any 

other companies under this 

antidumping duty order. 

Notification of Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred, and in the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also is the only reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: April 9, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–7082 Filed 4–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–504 

Petroleum Wax Candles from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 28, 2007, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published in the Federal 

Register a notice announcing the 

initiation of a new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on petroleum 

wax candles from the People’s Republic 

of China (‘‘PRC’’) for Hangzhou Fashion 

Living Co., Ltd (‘‘Fashion Living’’). See 

Petroleum Wax Candles from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of 

New Shipper Review, 72 FR 14,521 

(March 28, 2007) (‘‘Fashion Living 

Initiation’’). The period of review 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
18630 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 71 / Friday, April 13, 2007 / Notices 

1 In the preliminarily results, we determined that 

DSM, KISCO and HSI were affiliated and collapsed 

them into a single entity for margin calculation 

purposes because they met the regulatory criteria 

for collapsing affiliated producers/exporters. No 

interested party objected to our preliminary 

determination to collapse these companies. 

Therefore, for the final results margin calculation, 

we have continued to treat these companies as a 

single entity. 

2The petitioners are Nucor Corporation, 

Commercial Metals Company, and Gerdau 

Ameristeel Inc., collectively, Rebar Trade Action 

Coalition. 

(‘‘POR’’) is August 1, 2006, to January 

31, 2007. This review is now being 

rescinded because Fashion Living 

withdrew its request in a timely 

manner. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 13, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nicole Bankhead, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room 

4003, Washington, D.C. 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–9068. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 28, 1986, the Department 

published in the Federal Register an 

antidumping duty order covering 

petroleum wax candles from the PRC. 

See Antidumping Duty Order: 

Petroleum Wax Candles From the 

People’s Republic of China, 51 FR 30686 

(August 28, 1986). On February 16, 

2007, Fashion Living, requested, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214(b), that the 

Department conduct a new shipper 

review of this antidumping duty order 

covering the period August 1, 2006, 

through January 31, 2007. 

On March 19, 2007, the Department 

initiated a new shipper review of 

Fashion Living. See Fashion Living 

Initiation. On March 20, 2007, Fashion 

Living filed a letter withdrawing its 

request for a new shipper review. 

Rescission of Review 

The Department’s regulations state 

that if a party that requested a new 

shipper review withdraws the request 

within 60 days of the publication of the 

notice of initiation of the requested 

review, the Secretary will rescind the 

review. See 19 CFR 351.214(f)(1). 

Fashion Living withdrew its new 

shipper review request within the 60- 

day deadline. Accordingly, we are 

rescinding this new shipper review of 

the antidumping duty order on 

petroleum wax candles from the PRC for 

Fashion Living covering the period 

August 1, 2006, through January 31, 

2007. 

Notification of Interested Parties 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation that 

is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) 

and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(f)(3). 

Dated: April 6, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–7051 Filed 4–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–580–844 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from 

The Republic of Korea: Notice of Final 

Results and Final Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 10, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce published the 

preliminary results of the 2004 - 2005 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on steel 

concrete reinforcing bars from the 

Republic of Korea. The period of review 

(POR) is September 1, 2004, through 

August 31, 2005. 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we have not made 

changes in the margin calculations for 

the companies covered by this review. 

Therefore, the final results do not differ 

from the preliminary results. The final 

weighted–average dumping margins for 

the reviewed firms are listed below in 

the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of 

Review.’’

Furthermore, we are rescinding this 

review with respect to Hanbo Iron & 

Steel Co., Ltd. (Hanbo), INI Steel (INI) 

and Kosteel Co., Ltd. (Kosteel), as 

discussed below in the section entitled 

‘‘Partial Rescission of Review.’’

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 13, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Terre Keaton Stefanova or Katherine 

Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1280 or 

(202) 482–4929, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The review covers the following 

producers/exporters of the subject 

merchandise: Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., 

Korea Iron and Steel Co., Hwanyoung 

Steel Industries Co., Ltd. (collectively 

DSM/KISCO/HSI or ‘‘the respondent’’),1

and Dongil Industries Co., Ltd (Dongil). 

The period of review is September 1, 

2004, through August 31, 2005. 

October 10, 2006, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published 

the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on steel 

concrete reinforcing bars from the 

Republic of Korea. See Steel Concrete 

Reinforcing Bar From The Republic of 

Korea: Notice of Preliminary Results 

and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 71 FR 59440 (October 10, 2006) 

(Preliminary Results). We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. 

The petitioners filed a case brief on 

December 12, 2006.2 The respondent 

filed a rebuttal brief on December 18, 

2006. The respondent requested a 

hearing but subsequently withdrew its 

request. In lieu of a hearing, the 

petitioners and respondent requested 

separate ex parte meetings to discuss 

the yield strength model–matching 

criterion issue raised in their briefs. 

These ex parte meetings were held in 

January and February 2007 (see January 

29, 2007, and February 5, 2007, 

memoranda to the file). We have 

conducted this administrative review in 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES