alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Don't send fresh fruits and vegetables to the mainland, it's the law! send only if certified by USDA or preserved, cooked, dried, or frozen

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Don't send fresh fruits and vegetables to the mainland, it's the law! send only if certified by USDA or preserved, cooked, dried, or frozen 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  128 × 72 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  024290915.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
2024936009

FRA W31-221 02:47:36 p.m 03-29-2010

U.S. Department Deputy Administrator 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

of Transportation Washington, DC 20590

Federal Railroad
Administration

MAR 2 9 2010

Ms. Maria Ayerdi-Kaplan
Executive Director

Transbay Joint Powers Authority
201 Mission Street #2100

San Francisco, California 94105

Dear Ms. Ayerdi-Kaplan:

I write to confirm that Secretary LaHood has reserved funds within the overall California
allocation of the Department’s High Speed Rail grants to provide funding for design and
construction of the Transbay Terminal project. The California allocation will be
sufficient to provide up to $400 million to the Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA)
for eligible elements of the Transbay Terminal project, subject to completion of the
applicable regulatory clearances.

I greatly appreciate the cooperation you are providing us by making your staff and
contractors available to assist in our environmental work. I believe that will help to
minimize administrative delays and allow construction of the Transbay Terminal project
to begin as soon as possible.

Best Regards,

aren Rae
Deputy Administrator

213
Exhibit 11.1

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

The
following information sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net increase in net assets per share resulting from operations for the year ended December 31, 2013



|                                                                    |  |   |            | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- | 
|Numerator for increase in net assets per share  basic and diluted: |  | $ | 12,618     | 
|Denominator for basic weighted average shares:                      |  |   | 11,423,958 | 
|Earnings per share  basic and diluted:                             |  | $ | 1.10       |
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SPENCER E. MILES

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 2

- 1427

[ September 22, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 00 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seven teenth J udicial Circuit, Broward County ; Andrew L. Siegel

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 92

- 15650 CF 10 B

.

Spencer E. Miles, Lake City

, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., W ARNER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
(Reap. Dec. 9249)

#### North American Plywood Corp. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 823347-1/2, etc.

(Decided November 10, 1958)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

MollisoN, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule were submitted for decision by counsel for the parties upon a stipulation reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto that the merchandise involved in the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof consists of plywood exported from Finland in the years 1955 and 1956 and that the merchandise is properly dutiable on the basis of the foreign market value as defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for home consumption including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised unit values less 4% packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher export value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof and that the stipulation is limited to invoices where the merchandise was advanced in value and appraised on the basis of the home market value and that with respect to invoices embraced in said appeals where appraisement was made on the basis of the entered unit values said appeals are herewith abandoned with respect to said invoices.

On the agreed facts, as to the merchandise which was advanced in value by the appraiser, I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis of value for the merchandise and that said value in each instance was the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum packed. As to the merchandise which was appraised on the basis of the entered unit values, the appeals having been abandoned, are, to that extent, dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-02-1996
<CASH>                                             350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,248
<INVENTORY>                                     29,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,072
<PP&E>                                         108,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,833
<BONDS>                                         40,724
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,720
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,067)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,655
<SALES>                                         58,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,063
<CGS>                                           50,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    424
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                424
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        


</TABLE>
Copyright © 1997 Global Compliance, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Basics

Case No: 12-008-U - Flint Creek Retrofit Date Entered: 03/27/2012 09:30:33 AM

Party/Requestor: Sierra Club, Jeff Speir Date Received: 03/26/2012

Date Requested: 03/26/2012 Internal Due Date: 04/03/2012

Service Due Date: 04/11/2012

Answer Status: New Service Date:

Question No: 1-040

The 2011 SCR unit cost of $181/kW is at the lower end of the range of unit costs 

reported for other similar installations. (See, e.g., J.E. Chichanowicz, Overview of 

Information on Projected Control Technology Costs and Performance as Developed for 

EPA’s Integrated Planning Model (IPM), October 15, 2010.) Please explain why the 

reported cost is lower than reported for other similar retrofits. Please document your 

answer.

Answer:

The Company is not familiar with the "J.E. Chichanowicz, Overview of Information on 

Projected Control Technology Costs and Performance as Developed for EPA’s Integrated 

Planning Model (IPM), October 15, 2010", and cannot reconcile the Company's estimate 

to numbers provided in the report. However, the estimated as-built cost for the Flint 

Creek SCR is $230/kW. The $181/kW represents the $230/kW discounted to 2011 

dollars. Please refer to APSC Staff DR 1-3, file "Table 6 (SCW Dir) WP (Cost of 

Alternative).xls" in this proceeding for the associated calculations.

Advanced

Date Verified: Date Accepted:

Confidential: No

Yes

Attachments:

Voluminous: No

Yes

Highly Sensitive: No

Yes

Comments:

Preparer(s): Kevin J Munson; Michael L Wilkinson; Twana 

Banks-Smith; William E Mast

Witness: Christian T Beam

Modification History

Created by Twana Banks-Smith Created on 04/19/2012 12:10:37 PM Modified on 04/19/2012 01:35:24 PM
Copyright © 1997 Global Compliance, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Edit History

1. Twana Banks-Smith 04/19/2012 01:35:16 PM

0. Twana Banks-Smith 04/19/2012 12:37:04 PM
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

PP-2

HEARINGCERTIFICATION This certifies in accordance with the provisions ofTitle 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 51 .102 that the actions listed below were taken regarding the Connecticut Regional Haze State Implementation Plan

. 1) The public hearing was held on August 27, 2009 as announced in the notice of hearing (copy attached) ; 2) In accordance with the notice, materials were available for reviewin each Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) in Connecticut; 3) Copies ofthe notice were mailed to the directors ofthe air pollution control agencies in New

York, New

Jersey, Rhode Island and Massachusetts along with a copy to the Director ofthe Air Management Division of Region I ofthe U.S

. Environmental Protection Agency; and 4) The notice of hearing was published in newspapers as follows: Newspaper AQCR Date Connecticut Post (Bridgeport) 43 July 27, 2009 Hartford Courant 42 July 27, 2009 New London Day 41 July 27, 2009 The Register Citizen (Torrington) 44 July 27, 2009

October 26, 2009 Date Wendy J

. Jaco Bureau ofAir Management

( Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street " Hartford, CT 06106 - 5127

http://www

.ct.gov/dep Au Equal Opportuuitv Ernplover
# C_2008002EN.01000101.xml

| 5.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

4,20 % on 1 January 2008

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

4 January 2008

(2008/C 2/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4727 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 160,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4509 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,74495 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3755 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6406 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,45 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8650 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,129 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,64 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6985 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,6016 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5775 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,339 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7107 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6710 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4553 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4874 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9043 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1102 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 382,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0643 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7109 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3444 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 894,92 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8349 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,337 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,9780 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,874 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5709 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0171 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4727

JPY

Japanese yen

160,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4509

GBP

Pound sterling

0,74495

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3755

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6406

ISK

Iceland króna

90,45

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8650

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,129

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,64

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6985

PLN

Polish zloty

3,6016

RON

Romanian leu

3,5775

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,339

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7107

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6710

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4553

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4874

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9043

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1102

KRW

South Korean won

1 382,42

ZAR

South African rand

10,0643

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7109

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3444

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 894,92

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8349

PHP

Philippine peso

60,337

RUB

Russian rouble

35,9780

THB

Thai baht

43,874

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5709

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0171

---

(1)

1

Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6950]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10843 and <greek-i>10844]


Colorado Disaster <greek-i>CO-00015

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Colorado dated 04/05/2007.
    Incident: Tornado.
    Incident Period: 03/28/2007.
    Effective Date: 04/05/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/04/2007.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/07/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Prowers.
Contiguous Counties:
    Colorado: Baca, Bent, Kiowa.
    Kansas: Greeley, Hamilton, Stanton.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      5.750
Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.875
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      8.000
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10843 C 
and for economic injury is 10844 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are 
Colorado, Kansas.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: April 5, 2007.
Steven C. Preston,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-6950 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2007297EN.01001302.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 October 2007 — Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-332/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - EAGGF - Exclusion of expenditure from financing owing to failure to comply with Community rules)

(2007/C 297/20)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Appellant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: V. Kontolaimos and I. Khalkias, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2006 in Case T-251/04 Greece v Commission by which the Court dismissed an action seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2004/457/EC of 29 April 2004 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (notified under document number C(2004) 1706) (OJ 2004 L 156, p. 47)

Greece

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 224, 16.9.2006.

1

---
#### JULIAN LEE, Private, Petitioner v WILLIARD PEARSON, Major General, Commanding General, United States Army Training Center, Fort Lewis, Washington, Respondent

18 USCMA 545, 40 CMR 257

*546Miscellaneous Docket No. 69-40

August 29, 1969

*Kenneth A. MacDonald, Esquire, Francis Hoague, Esquire, Alec Bayless, Esquire, Stephen R. Feldman, Esquire,*and *Jeffrey Steinborn, Esquire,*counsel for Petitioner.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court

In his Petition for Writ of Prohibition or Writ of Mandamus, petitioner alleges that on April 23, 1969, the Secretary of the Army denied his “Request for Discharge as a Conscientious Objector.” Thereafter, he filed a second “Request” which was returned to him without action. While preparing an application to the Board for Correction of Military Records, his Company Commander ordered him to “train —to go out and join the company.” Petitioner acknowledges he refused to obey this order, stating compliance would “violate the dictates of his conscience.” A charge alleging a violation of Article 90(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 890, was preferred and has been referred to trial by a general court-martial appointed by the respondent.

Petitioner seeks to stay the proceedings of the general court-martial pending a decision of the Board for Correction of Military Records.

In United States v Noyd, 18 USCMA 483, 40 CMR 195, we held:

> “Fundamental to an effective armed force is the obligation of obedience to lawful orders. The obligation to obey a lawful order cannot be, and is not, as a matter of law, terminated on the mere occurrence of a condition or circumstance that might justify separation from the service. On the contrary, the obligation to obey continues until the individual is actually discharged in accordance with the provisions of law. . . . Consequently, the fact that a person in a military status determines that he has undergone a change of conscience does not, at that instant and from that time, endow him with the right to decide what orders are compatible with his conscience.”

That holding is dispositive here.

The extent of the limitations upon duty assignments of individuals applying for discharge effected by Army Regulation 635-10, May 21, 1968, terminate with the action of the Secretary denying the application. They are not revived by the mere fact of an appeal to the Board for Correction of Military Records. Upon the announcement of the Secretary’s action, the petitioner had no right “to decide what orders are compatible with his conscience.” United States v Noyd, supra.

Our conclusion is not to be construed as dispositive of the issue of the guilt or innocence of the petitioner with reference to the charge now pending trial. That determination may be made only by the court-martial upon the basis of all of the evidence presented.

Since no basis for relief is presented in the petition, it is denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

NATHANIEL KIMBROUGH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3638

[February 14, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 00-8714 CF10A.

Nathaniel Kimbrough, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 43039.

#### Protest 720648-G of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstracts 30366 and 30364 the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.