alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 190/20 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 190 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5720 June 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 190

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5720 June 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 190/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 190/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2014/C 190/02 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General block exemption Regulation) (1) | 7 |
| 2014/C 190/03 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 | 86 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2014/C 190/02

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General block exemption Regulation) (1)

7

2014/C 190/03

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

86

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The legend of the pipe and the white buffalo calf woman

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The legend of the pipe and the white buffalo calf woman 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  Runnels, Vic 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of the Interior 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Contains illustration and the text of the legend. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 46 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  008713497.jpg; 008713497.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WAYNE ANDERSON NEWTON, Seaman, U. S. Navy, Appellant

18 USCMA 562, 40 CMR 274

No. 22,223

September 5, 1969

*Commander E. M. Fulton, Jr.,*JAGC, USN, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Ca-ptain Lester G. Fant, III,*USMCR, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The accused pleaded guilty before a general court-martial, to four specifications of absence without leave and two specifications of breach of restriction, in violation of Articles 86 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886 and 934, respectively. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, confinement at hard labor for thirty-six months, and reduction. Intermediate appellate authorities have approved the findings and sentence without change. We granted review on the single issue of:

> *563Whether the law officer’s failure to instruct. the court-martial on the voting procedures required by paragraph 766(2), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, prejudiced the accused.

Paragraph 766(2), Manual, supra, provides, in pertinent part, that after discussion between the members of the court as to the sentence to be decided upon,

> “. . . any member who desires to propose a sentence writes his proposal on a slip of paper. The junior member collects these proposed sentences and submits them to the president. The court then votes on the proposed sentences, *beginning with the lightest,*until a sentence is adopted by the concurrence of the required number of members.” [Emphasis supplied.]

In his instructions to the court on voting procedures, the law officer failed to tell the court that it should begin by voting on the lightest sentence proposed. This was error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused. United States v Johnson, 18 USCMA 436, 40 CMR 148.

As we said in *Johnson,*supra:

> “A court, uninstructed as to this procedure, may well believe that the voting could properly commence with consideration of the most severe proposed sentence. Since we have no way of ascertaining what took place, the voting having been conducted in secret, and, inasmuch as, in our opinion, the matter concerned a substantial right of the accused, the doctrine of plain error may be properly invoked. United States v Stephen, 15 USCMA 314, 35 CMR 286. Reversal as to sentence is required.”

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A rehearing on sentence may be ordered.
### Wad e Davi s 

# )>d7'0^r'im-^t^ x

From : Sent : To : Subject : Edward E

. Hir t [eehirt@unitedhelpers.org ] Thursday , Augus t 19 , 201 0 9:2 6 A M Wad e Davi s cap e ai r Hell o Wade , I hav e ha

d th e opportunit yt o fl ywit h Cap e Ai r o n severa l occasion s an d hav e found themt o b e a grea t airline . Th e staf f i s friendly , flight s o n time , enjoyabl e fligh t t o Alban yan d verylo w price . Th e fligh t t o Alban ymake s i t convenien t fo r busines s being conducte d i n Alban yan d I hav e no t ha

d a proble mwit h gettin g connectin g flight s t o othe r destinations . I a mverysatisfie d wit h Cap e Air . Ne d Hir t £ 3 t > - G O 

## T)

. — 

### :>-ii:4 J

1 • 1 rfi,^

'r>

. 

### m-3r n '^^^ 

# ao o ^ ' C O
# C_2008268EN.01S00301.xml

| 23.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
No. 65665.

#### W. Y. Moberly, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/20550, etc. (Great Falls).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Panel rehearing granted by order filed 1/19/01; opinion filed 11/1/00 is vacated UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6620

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GUY CARMICHAEL CRENSHAW, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-96-47, CA-99-424-7) Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Guy Carmichael Crenshaw, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Guy Carmichael Crenshaw seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Crenshaw’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Crenshaw , Nos. CR-96-47; CA-99-424-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v FRANK A. LACH, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

7 USCMA 305, 22 CMR 95

No. 8086

Decided August 24, 1956

*Lieutenant Colonel James M. Seott*and *First Lieutenant James L. Gault*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Thomas J.*Newton, *Captain Vernon M. Culpepper,*and *First Lieutenant William K. Davenport*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

Among the issues in this ease is one similar to that presented in United States v Hawthorne, 7 USCMA 293, 22 CMR 83. For the reasons set out in that opinion, the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for transmittal to the officer exercising summary court-martial jurisdiction over the accused for his consideration and action.

Judge FERGUSON concurs.

LatimeR, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result for the reasons set' forth in my concurring opinion in United States v Hawthorne, 7 USCMA 293, 22 CMR 83.
EXHIBIT 32.2  Section 1350 Certification  In connection with the Annual Report of Bnet Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, R. Nickolas Jones, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial and accounting officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.October 20, 2014/s/R. Nickolas Jones
R. Nickolas Jones, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial and accounting officer
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Fast cash earn a $2,000 bonus in the Army National Guard

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Fast cash earn a $2,000 bonus in the Army National Guard 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Army National Guard 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  168 × 94 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  18282442.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2008301EN.01000202.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/2

---

Assignment of Judges to the Chambers of three Judges

(2008/C 301/03)

At its meeting on 30 September 2008, the Court decided to assign the Judges to the Chambers as follows:

Fifth Chamber

Mr Ilešič, President of the Chamber

Mr Tizzano, Mr Borg Barthet, Mr Levits, Mr Kasel, Judges

Sixth Chamber

Mr Bonichot, President of the Chamber

Sir Konrad Schiemann, Mr Makarczyk, Mr Kūris, Mr Bay Larsen, Ms Toader, Judges

Seventh Chamber

Mr Ó Caoimh, President of the Chamber

Mr Cunha Rodrigues, Mr Klučka, Mr Lõhmus, Ms Lindh, Mr Arabadjiev, Judges

Eighth Chamber

Mr von Danwitz, President of the Chamber

Ms Silva de Lapuerta, Mr Juhász, Mr Arestis, Mr Malenovský, Judges

---
# C_2007211EN.01003602.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/36

---

Action brought on 29 June 2007 — Thomson Sales Europe v Commission

(Case T-225/07)

(2007/C 211/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Thomson Sales Europe (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: F.Goguel and F. Foucault, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Before ruling, order disclosure to the parties all of the materials, documents, reports, letters, preparatory works etc which led to the two Regulations No 2376/94 and No 710/95; |
| --- | --- |

—

Before ruling, order disclosure to the parties all of the materials, documents, reports, letters, preparatory works etc which led to the two Regulations No 2376/94 and No 710/95;

| — | Principally, annul the decision of the Commission REM No 03/05 of 7 May 2007. |
| --- | --- |

—

Principally, annul the decision of the Commission REM No 03/05 of 7 May 2007.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision No REM 03/05 of 7 May 2007 holding that the remission of import duties is not justified in the particular case of the applicant. That decision was issued following the application made to the Commission by the French national authorities, who had claimed from the applicant payment of anti-dumping duties on importation of colour television receivers manufactured in Thailand by its subsidiary there, and on which the subsidiary had applied for remission on the basis of Article 239 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code. (1)

1

The applicant considers that it is entitled to the remission on the basis of Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, since, in its opinion, it satisfies the two conditions laid down in that provision.

As regards the first condition (the existence of a special situation), the applicant claims that its situation is certainly special and is the result of, first, the conduct of the Commission which changed its approach to interpretation of the legal provisions on the origin of goods without having properly informed traders, and, second, the conduct of the national authorities who followed the approach adopted by the Commission.

As regards the second condition referred to in Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (no deception or negligence), the applicant claims that it cannot be considered to have been negligent since it trusted in the validity of the initial position of the Commission's services, who, in the opinion of the applicant, decided not to employ in its case a strict application of the rules of origin but to apply to it the special anti-dumping duties on all the receivers manufactured and exported by its Thailand subsidiary.

---

(1)  OJ L 302, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 10.3.1




---



##### 



SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT
 Retirement Benefit
 Death Benefit
 2




---



##### 



TIME AND FORM OF PAYMENT
 3




---



##### 



FORFEITURE UPON TERMINATION FOR CAUSE; PAYMENT UPON CHANGE IN CONTROL
 Forfeiture Upon Termination for Cause
  4




---



##### 



Payment Upon Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason After a Change in
Control.
  ABSENCE OF FUNDING
 5




---



##### 



DEFINITIONS
  Beneficiary
 Board
 Cause
 6




---



##### 



Change in Control.
  7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



Code
 Death Benefit
 Disability
 Good Reason
  9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



Retirement Benefit
 Separation from Service
 Service
 11




---



##### 



Specified Employee
 MISCELLANEOUS
    12




---



##### 



13




---



##### 



ROCKVILLE BANKBy

/s/ Richard
J. TrachimowiczIts Richard
J. TrachimowiczROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC.By

/s/ Richard
J. TrachimowiczIts Richard
J. Trachimowicz/s/ John
T. LundJohn T. Lund 14




---



##### 



Primary BeneficiaryBeneficiary(ies)Address andZip CodeBirth DateSoc. Sec. No.RelationshipPercentage
  Alternate BeneficiaryBeneficiary(ies)Address andZip CodeBirth DateSoc. Sec. No.RelationshipPercentage
 o o
 Signature of Witness
    
    John T. LundWitness Signature Date
    
    Date
 15
110 STAT. 3022 PUBLIC LAW 104–219—OCT. 1, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 533:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–799 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 141 (1995): June 30, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 142 (1996): Sept. 17, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 104–219

104th Congress

An Act

To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to Federal court, and for other

purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL.

The first sentence of section 1447(c) of title 28, United States

Code, is amended by striking ‘‘any defect in removal procedure’’

and inserting ‘‘any defect other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction’’.

Approved October 1, 1996.

Oct. 1, 1996

[S. 533]