alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CA2008067EN.01000401.xml

| 12.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 67/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 67/4

---

Corrigendum to admission tests and notice of open competition OHIM/AST/02/07 — Assistants (AST3) in the field of industrial property

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 300 A of 12 December 2007
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 300 A of 12 December 2007

(2008/C 67 A/04)

On page 53, Section II ‘Test procedures’, the last paragraph should read as follows:

for:

for:

‘The candidates with the 22 highest aggregate marks3 in the admission tests and a pass mark in each will be invited to submit a full application for admission to the open competition.’;

read:

read:

‘The candidates with the 88 highest aggregate marks3 in the admission tests and a pass mark in each will be invited to submit a full application for admission to the open competition.’.

On page 59, Section II ‘Test procedures’ should read as follows:

for:

for:

‘The appointing authority will draw up a list of the candidates who satisfy the general conditions set out in Section I(a) of ADMISSION TESTS and send it to the chair of the selection board together with their application files.

The selection board will admit you to the written tests if you are among the candidates with the highest aggregate marks1 in admission tests (a) and (b) and a pass mark in each (see Section II of ADMISSION TESTS), and provided you meet the special conditions set out in Section I(b) of ADMISSION TESTS.’;

read:

read:

‘Once the applications have been received, the appointing authority will draw up a list of the candidates who meet the general conditions set out in Section I(a) and send it to the chair of the selection board together with their application files.

After having looked through this list, the selection board will admit you to the written test if you are among the candidates with the 22 highest aggregate marks1 in the admission tests and meet the specific conditions set out in Section I(b) of Admission tests.’.

---
# C_2009004EN.01000201.xml

| 9.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 January 2009

(2009/C 4/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3617 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4529 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89330 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7120 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4941 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4825 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,198 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,77 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7069 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0315 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1618 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1232 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9357 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6344 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5586 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3103 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0181 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 817,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1336 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3068 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3096 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 019,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8211 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,730 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,4700 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,564 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0902 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4054 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,9270 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3617

JPY

Japanese yen

124,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4529

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89330

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7120

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4941

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4825

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,198

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,77

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7069

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0315

RON

Romanian leu

4,1618

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1232

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9357

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6344

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5586

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3103

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0181

KRW

South Korean won

1 817,19

ZAR

South African rand

13,1336

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3068

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3096

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 019,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8211

PHP

Philippine peso

63,730

RUB

Russian rouble

41,4700

THB

Thai baht

47,564

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0902

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4054

INR

Indian rupee

65,9270

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection

[CBP Dec. 07-20]


Re-Accreditation and Re-Approval of Columbia Inspection, Inc., as 
a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of re-approval of Columbia Inspection, Inc., of 
Portland, Oregon, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 
151.13, Columbia Inspection, Inc., 7133 North Lombard Street, Portland, 
Oregon 97203, has been re-approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum 
products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils, and to test petroleum 
and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the 
provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this 
entity to conduct laboratory analysis or gauger services should request 
and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or 
approved by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries 
regarding the specific tests or gauger services this entity is 
accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry 
may also be sent to http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_ svcs/org--and--operations.xml.

DATES: The re-approval of Columbia Inspection, Inc., as a commercial 
gauger and laboratory became effective on July 14, 2005. The next 
triennial inspection date will be scheduled for July 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene J. Bondoc, Ph.D, or Randall 
Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, Bureau of Customs and 
Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, 
Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: April 6, 2007.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E7-6896 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6553

WALTER ELLIS PAIGE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS; W. P. ROGERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-96-291-AM)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Ellis Paige, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Paige v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-96-291-AM (E.D.

Va. Mar. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              10,493
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       24,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                           821
<INVENTORY>                                         20,460
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    60,069
<PP&E>                                              85,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                      47,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     301,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               33,687
<BONDS>                                             40,743
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            17,661
<OTHER-SE>                                         196,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       301,254
<SALES>                                            143,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   143,018
<CGS>                                               90,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       90,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11,903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     37,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                        13,990
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 23,141
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        23,141
<EPS-BASIC>                                           1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.46



</TABLE>
# C_2008230EN.01000202.xml

| 9.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5227 — Robert Bosch/Samsung/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 230/04)

On 18 August 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5227. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5227. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Case No. 15,144.

#### UNITED STATES v. FOUR CASES CUTLERY.

[1 Hunt, Mer. Mag. 166.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

August, 1839.

Customs Duties—False Invoice — Forfeitures.

Suit by the United States against four cases of cutlery, Edward Leon and Theodore Myers, claimants and defendants, trading as Edward Leon & Co. The amount of the invoice was £127. 13s. 9d.; the valuation of the custom-house appraisers, £191. 17s. 7d.,—differ-ence, or supposed undervaluation, £64. 3s. lOd.

Various witnesses were examined, and a variety of opinions expressed, as to the value of the goods. The weight of testimony, however, converged to one point, namely, that on manufactured articles, of which labor constituted the principal value, and this fluctuating in price from ten to fifteen, and sometimes twenty per cent., and the articles, when manufactured, being frequently sold by small dealers at reduced prices to raise money, it was possible that the goods in question might have been bought at invoice prices, and more than probable that they were so.

BETTS. District Judge

(charging jury), it is not enough for the government to show that goods are invoiced at a low rate, but they are bound to prove that the invoice is made out with the intent to defraud. It remains merely for the jury to decide: (1) Has this invoice been so made out? (2) Have the government shown this, either by proof direct or inferential? Or, (3) have the defendants shown that they were invoiced at their fair market value? It is a simple question of fact which they are to decide.

The jury retired, and made up a sealed verdict mstanter for the defendants.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Can you meet the President's challenge? Fitness is feeling great!

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Can you meet the President's challenge? Fitness is feeling great! 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, Department of Health and Human Services 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018305346.jpg; 018305346.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS 

# TEMPORARY REVISION 2B−2186 

# C

Aug 08/11 TR# 2B−2186 Airworthiness Requirements Part 2 of Maintenance Requirements Manual Appendix B − Airworthiness Limitations Page 1 of 1 The contents of this Temporary Revision have been approved by the Chief, Engineering (or designate), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada Civil Aviation Date July 25, 2011 Signed Remy Knoerr


### FILING INSTRUCTIONS: Insert this Temporary Revision (TR) 2B−2186 facing page 2B−9, in Part 2 of the Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM). Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of the MRM Part 2. Keep this Temporary Revison until normal revision service incorporates this information into the Maintenance Requirements Manual. DESCRIPTION: This Temporary Revision is issued to revise the NDT MANUAL REF. (from NOTE 5 to 27−40−102 Part 7), and to revise the task DESCRIPTION (to specify upper and lower installation pins).
STRUCTURAL AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS
NDT INSPECTION INTERVAL AWL NUMBER MRB TASK REFERENCE NDT MANUAL DESCRIPTION INSPECT TYPE 51000 lb MTOW 53000 lb MTOW NUMBER REFERENCE REF. SC O TYPE THRESHOLD (LANDINGS) REPEAT (LANDINGS) THRESHOLD (LANDINGS) REPEAT (LANDINGS) Pitch Trim Actuator 27−40−102 MSI 274001 27−40−102 Part 7 Horizontal stabilizer pitch trim actuator upper and lower installation pins Special Detailed 40000 40000 40000 40000
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10025 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RICHARD SALAS, JR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-72-ALL Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Richard Salas, Jr., presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2006), which held that a district court may order a term ofimprisonment torun consecutively with an unimposed state United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D July 9, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-10025

2 sentence. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9116 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9116

  To make ineligible for asylum any alien who commits certain actions 
          against the National Guard, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2024

Mr. Arrington introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To make ineligible for asylum any alien who commits certain actions 
          against the National Guard, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALIENS WHO COMMIT CERTAIN ACTIONS AGAINST NATIONAL GUARD.

    Section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Prohibited on Asylum.--Any alien who causes the destruction 
of any defensive barrier on the United States border or uses force 
against a member of the National Guard--
            ``(1) shall be ineligible to apply for asylum or any other 
        status; and
            ``(2) shall be subject to expedited removal not later than 
        72 hours after the alien is apprehended.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 71 (Friday, April 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5772]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Treasures From the Hermitage and Guggenheim 
Collections''

    Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Treasures from the Hermitage and 
Guggenheim Collections'', imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Guggenheim-Hermitage Museum, Las Vegas, Nevada, 
from on or about May 25, 2007, until on or about February 29, 2008, and 
at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.
    For Further Information Contact: For further information, including 
a list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr Sulzynsky, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, 
SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: April 5, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7-7040 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 19, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 19, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0241. ALSF CAPITAL, LLC v. DAVENPORT CAPITAL, LLC.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.