alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.11



|     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045
 Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380
|     |  | 
|     |  | 
|     |  | 
|     |  | 

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GS1
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2016



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|              
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 145 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 145

          Designating June 2005 as ``National Safety Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2005

  Mr. DeWine (for himself and Mrs. Feinstein) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          Designating June 2005 as ``National Safety Month''.

Whereas the mission of the National Safety Council is to educate and influence 
        society to adopt safety, health, and environmental policies, practices, 
        and procedures that prevent and mitigate human suffering and economic 
        losses arising from preventable causes;
Whereas the National Safety Council works to protect lives and promote health 
        with innovative programs;
Whereas the National Safety Council, founded in 1913, is celebrating its 92nd 
        anniversary in 2005 as the premier source of safety and health 
        information, education, and training in the United States;
Whereas the National Safety Council was congressionally chartered in 1953, and 
        is celebrating its 52nd anniversary in 2005 as a congressionally 
        chartered organization;
Whereas even with advancements in safety that create a safer environment for the 
        people of the United States, such as new legislation and improvements in 
        technology, the unintentional-injury death toll is still unacceptable;
Whereas the National Safety Council has demonstrated leadership in educating the 
        Nation in the prevention of injuries and deaths to senior citizens as a 
        result of falls;
Whereas citizens deserve a solution to nationwide safety and health threats;
Whereas such a solution requires the cooperation of all levels of government, as 
        well as the general public;
Whereas the summer season, traditionally a time of increased unintentional-
        injury fatalities, is an appropriate time to focus attention on both the 
        problem and the solution to such safety and health threats; and
Whereas the theme of ``National Safety Month'' for 2005 is ``Safety: Where We 
        Live, Work, and Play'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates June 2005 as ``National Safety Month''; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling upon the people of the United States to observe the 
        month with appropriate ceremonies and activities that promote 
        acknowledgment, gratitude, and respect for the advances of the 
        National Safety Council and its mission.
                                 <all>
```
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Spacelab

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Spacelab 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Brief description and cutaway view of the Spacelab component of the space shuttle. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Spacelab Program 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  1111 × 110 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  022631057.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH 

NO. 2-10-009-CV

FORT WORTH BEAUTY SCHOOL, INC. APPELLANT

V.

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY APPELLEE

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice.” It

is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 25, 2010

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
No. 44178.

#### Protests 808140-G, etc., of Armand Schwab & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314) the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 33 cents per pound and 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1115 (a) as claimed.
Before The Third Division,

January 8, 1941

No. 45137.

#### Petitions 6006-R, etc., of H. Yamanaka & Co., Ltd., et al. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In this case evidence was introduced which showed that the importers filed entry at the invoice values at the time of importation of the goods and later filed an amended entry, which was timely. Both the assistant collector and the collector accepted the amendment but the comptroller refused to verify the amended entry because the estimated increased duties resulting from said amendment had not been paid at the time of filing the amendment. It was apparent that the collector’s office followed its usual practice at the time, and that also at that time there had been very few amendments to entries at the port of Honolulu, so there was no established practice as to the requirements of a deposit of additional duties under such circumstances. On the record presented it was found that the importers were without intent to deceive the Government officials or defraud the revenue and that they acted in good faith. The petitions were therefore granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TODHUNTER
INTERNATIONAL, INC'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,487,028
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,532,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 24,332,245
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,419,033
<PP&E>                                      75,535,298
<DEPRECIATION>                              35,348,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,828,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,761,950
<BONDS>                                     37,613,799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,497
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,588,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,637,548
<SALES>                                     57,428,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,428,039
<CGS>                                       39,621,622
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,621,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,491,122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,773,531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,541,764
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,170,505
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,371,259
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,371,259
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 8795)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 14805; 8360; 9659.

(Decided May 10, 1957)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These three appeals for reappraisement relate to certain bicycles exported from Germany and entered at the port of Los Angeles, Calif.

The cases have been submitted for decision on an agreed set of facts that show cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question and that establish such statutory value to be the invoice unit values, less inland freight, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of June 1, 2016 by andamong Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc. as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association asTrustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administratorand Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and AssetRepresentations Reviewer relating to the Bank of America Merrill LynchCommercial Mortgage Trust 2016-UBS10, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2016-UBS10 **(BACM 2016- UBS10)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018 to December31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and ServicingAgreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, ManagingDirector 

 

Date: March 1, 2019
U.S. Department of 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Transportation GENERAL COUNSEL Washington, DC 20590

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

49 CFR 37.42(a) 5/24/12

QUESTION:

WHERE THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 37.42 APPLY, WHICH CARS OF A TRAIN 

DOES A RAILROAD OPERATOR HAVE TO MAKE AVAILABLE TO PASSENGERS WITH 

DISABILITIES?

ANSWER:

• The performance standard of section 37.42(a) requires that passengers with disabilities “must have 

access to all accessible cars available to passengers without disabilities in each train using the 

station.

• The standard applies only to “accessible” cars meeting the requirements of 49 CFR Part 38. Some 

railroads continue to operate a number of inaccessible cars (e.g., 1950s-era double-decker commuter 

cars) that people with mobility impairments cannot enter and use. The requirement does not apply to 

cars of this kind.

• Moreover, the standard applies only to “cars available to passengers without disabilities” at a given 

station. There can be a number of situations in which not all cars in a train are made available to 

anyone at a station. 

• For example, at a station with a relatively short platform, only cars 1-4 of an 8-car train may be 

available to any passenger. In some commuter rail systems, only two cars are open to be boarded by 

any passenger at a station. 

• In situations like these, only those cars that are made available to other passengers at the station have 

to be made available to passengers with disabilities. The railroad operator generally would not be 

required to make cars available to passengers with disabilities that are not made available to other 

passengers.

• However, if all wheelchair locations are occupied by other wheelchair users in cars where the doors 

normally open at a station, the Department expects the railroad operator to double-stop or move a 

lift, where necessary, in order to provide transportation to a wheelchair user in an unoccupied 

wheelchair location. (Of course, railroad operators are always responsible for moving passengers’ 

luggage and other items out of wheelchair locations to permit their use by a wheelchair user.) 

Likewise, if the only way a passenger with a disability can access a food service car is through an 

adjacent car, then the railroad should provide access to the adjacent car. 

The General Counsel of the Department of Transportation has reviewed this document and 

approved it as consistent with the language and intent of 49 CFR Part 37.
# C_2023078EN.01000101.xml

| 2.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11018 – COMPAGNIA SIDERURGICA ITALIANA / STEELAG DEUTSCHLAND)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 78/01)

On 20 February 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11018. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11018. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 13.2

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the annual report of
China Zenix Auto International Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Martin Cheung, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the
dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2015
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Martin Cheung      
|Name:                |  | Martin Cheung          
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
1.
    
    In recognition that effective October 12, 2006 the Company effected the change of
its name from TransTechnology Corporation to Breeze-Eastern Corporation, the defined
term Company in the Agreement and this Amendment shall refer to Breeze-Eastern
Corporation.2.
    
    Paragraph 2(c) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.3.
    
    The first sentence of Paragraph 3(b) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety and the following substituted therefore:With respect to the period beginning on April 1, 2008 and ending on the last
day of the Term of the Agreement (as defined in Section 5) the Company shall
pay to Executive base salary at a rate of not less than $273,620 per annum.4.
    
    Except as specifically amended by the provisions of this Amendment, the
provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
  /s/  Joseph F. SpanierJoseph F. SpanierBREEZE-EASTERN CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/  Robert L.G. WhiteName:
    Robert L.G. WhiteTitle:
    President & Chief Executive Officer 27
Before the Third Division,

September 2, 1942

No. 47526.

#### Protest 822791-G of W. F. Daly & Son (Galveston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial plaintiffs’ witness testified that the merchandise in question is bought and sold by them upon the basis of 800 pounds to the bale whether it weighed more or less than such amount, and that that was the practice in the cotton industry. It was admitted, however, that the plaintiffs did not weigh any of the bales imported herein. From an examination of the invoice and entry papers nothing was found to show that the customs officials performed their duties otherwise than in accordance with law nor was anything found to indicate that an excessive moisture existed or that a claim for allowance upon such ground was filed with the collector. The evidence presented failed to disclose anything sufficient to overcome the piesumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled. *United States*v. *Ingram*(17 C. C. P. A. 228, T. D. 43668), *Perkins, Goodwin & Co.*v. *United States*(160 Fed. 272), and *Frame*v. *United States*(G. A. 8888, T. D. 40476) cited.
# C_2007211EN.01005101.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/51

---

Action brought on 17 July 2007 — Campo de Alcalá del Río v Council and Commission

(Case T-258/07)

(2007/C 211/96)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: S. Coop. And. de Productores Campo de Alcalá del Río (Sevilla, Spain) (represented by: L. Ortiz Blanco, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities

Defendants:

Form of order sought

| — | declare under Article 288 EC that the applicant is entitled to have damage totalling one million thirty five thousand four hundred and sixty six euros (EUR 1 035 466) made good by the Council and the Commission jointly and severally; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare under Article 288 EC that the applicant is entitled to have damage totalling one million thirty five thousand four hundred and sixty six euros (EUR 1 035 466) made good by the Council and the Commission jointly and severally;

| — | order the defendants to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendants to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-217/07 Las Palmeras v Council and Commission.

Las Palmeras

Council and Commission

---