alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (31)-2
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard D. Rodekohr, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranscontinentalGas Pipe Line Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 5, 2004     By: /s/ Richard D. Rodekohr      Richard D. Rodekohr   Vice President and Treasurer   (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2007315EN.01001202.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 November 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Ludwigs-Apotheke München Internationale Apotheke v Juers Pharma Import-Export GmbH

(Case C-143/06) (1)

1

(Free movement of goods - Articles 28 EC and 30 EC - Articles 11 and 13 of the EEA Agreement - Imported medicinal products not authorised in the importing State - Prohibition of advertising - Directive 2001/83/EC)

(2007/C 315/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ludwigs-Apotheke München Internationale Apotheke

Applicant:

Defendant: Juers Pharma Import-Export GmbH

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Landgericht Hamburg — Interpretation of the third indent of Article 86(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67), as amended by Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 34) — Scope of application — National rules prohibiting an importer from sending pharmacies price lists of medicinal products which, although not authorised on the national market, may even so be imported

Operative part of the judgment

A prohibition on advertising such as that laid down by Paragraph 8 of the Law on the advertising of medicines (Heilmittelwerbegesetz) must be assessed in the light not of the provisions on advertising of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, as amended by Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004, but of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC and Articles 11 and 13 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992. Article 28 EC and Article 11 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area preclude such a prohibition, in so far as it applies to the distribution to pharmacists of lists of non-approved medicinal products, the importation of which from another Member State or a non-Member State which is a party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area is authorised only on an exceptional basis, which contain no information other than that concerning the trade name, packaging size, dose and price of those medicinal products.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

1

---
No. 58188.

protests 619615-G and 591354-G (New York).

#### Melchers, Inc., and Alfred Richter *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of moufflons similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 57768, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Exhibit 34.1



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that
Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (Midland or the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for
all transactions serviced on the Enterprise!Loan Management System (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D),
1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our
examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected
servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the
selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests
that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Midland complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

February 25, 2016



LOGO
# C_2008173EN.01000201.xml

| 8.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 July 2008

(2008/C 173/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5651 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 168,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4572 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79630 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4065 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6149 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 120,46 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9855 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,550 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 232,92 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7039 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,3110 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6026 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,245 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9224 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6363 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5988 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,2087 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0781 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1351 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 629,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,1202 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7507 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2420 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 415,35 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1108 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 71,369 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,8463 |
| THB | Thai baht | 52,658 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5168 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1565 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5651

JPY

Japanese yen

168,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4572

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79630

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4065

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6149

ISK

Iceland króna

120,46

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9855

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,550

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

232,92

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7039

PLN

Polish zloty

3,3110

RON

Romanian leu

3,6026

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,245

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9224

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6363

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5988

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,2087

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0781

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1351

KRW

South Korean won

1 629,66

ZAR

South African rand

12,1202

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7507

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2420

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 415,35

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1108

PHP

Philippine peso

71,369

RUB

Russian rouble

36,8463

THB

Thai baht

52,658

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5168

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1565

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
No. 58193.

protests 168843-K, etc. (New York).

#### Indian Sales Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of speedometers and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Industrial Operations, Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 82, C. D. 1500), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**GAO-03-259**                      Published: Dec 19, 2002. Publicly Released: Dec 26, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

Surveys suggest that as many as two-thirds of American households have donated money to charitable organizations to aid in the response to the September 11 disasters. To provide the public with information on the role of charitable aid in assisting those affected by the attacks, GAO was asked to report on the amount of donations charities raised and distributed, the accountability measures in place to prevent fraud by organizations and individuals, and lessons learned about how to best distribute charitable aid in similar situations.

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

## Full Report

Highlights

Full Report (43 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Economic Development

Best practicesCharitable organizationsDisaster relief aidFraudFunds managementHomeland securityTerrorismDisaster preparednessCharitiesPolice
No. 54222.

#### Amer-Mex Import & Export Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 146641-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 15.1



LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-211702) of Prima BioMed Ltd of our report dated October 19, 2017 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 20-F.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

Sydney, Australia

October 19, 2017

PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABN 52 780 433 757

One International Towers Sydney, Watermans Quay, Barangaroo NSW 2000,

GPO BOX 2650 Sydney NSW 2001

T: +61 2 8266 0000, F:
+61 2 8266 9999, www.pwc.com.au
July 6 , 2015

Mr. Brian E. Kiser

132 Saratoga Drive

Frankfort, KY 40601

Dear Mr. Kiser:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your April 3 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0898 ), but

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, h ow it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional i nformation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any ques tions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<Page>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this
Quarterly Report of Todhunter International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30,
2002 and September 30, 2001 and its results of operations for the three-month
and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2002.

                                       /s/ A. Kenneth Pincourt, Jr.
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       A. Kenneth Pincourt, Jr.
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 9, 2002

                                       21
110 STAT. 2872 PUBLIC LAW 104–203—SEPT. 25, 1996

Public Law 104–203

104th Congress

An Act

To extend nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to the

products of Cambodia, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

The Congress finds that—

(1) despite recent increases in acts of repression by the

Cambodian Government and growing government corruption

that has contributed to substantial environmental degradation,

Cambodia has made some progress towards democratic rule

after 20 years of undemocratic regimes and civil war, and

is striving to rebuild its market economy;

(2) extension of unconditional most-favored-nation treatment would assist Cambodia in developing its economy based

on free market principles and becoming competitive in the

global marketplace;

(3) establishing normal commercial relations on a reciprocal

basis with Cambodia will promote United States exports to

the rapidly growing Southeast Asian region and expand

opportunities for United States business and investment in

the Cambodian economy; and

(4) expanding bilateral trade relations that includes a

commercial agreement may promote further progress by Cambodia on human rights and democratic rule and assist

Cambodia in adopting regional and world trading rules and

principles.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT TO THE

PRODUCTS OF CAMBODIA.

(a) HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE AMENDMENT.—General note

3(b) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

amended by striking ‘‘Kampuchea’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a)

applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse

for consumption, on or after the effective date of a notice published

in the Federal Register by the United States Trade Representative

that a trade agreement obligating reciprocal most-favored-nation

treatment between Cambodia and the United States has entered

into force.

Federal Register,

publication.

Sept. 25, 1996

[H.R. 1642]
PUBLIC LAW 104–203—SEPT. 25, 1996 110 STAT. 2873

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1642:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–160 (Comm. on Ways and Means).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 104–264 (Comm. on Finance).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 141 (1995): July 10, 11, considered and passed House.

Vol. 142 (1996): July 25, considered and passed Senate, amended.

Sept. 12, House concurred in Senate amendment.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 32 (1996):

Sept. 25, Presidential statement.

Æ

SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

The President shall submit to the Congress, not later than

18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, a report

on the trade relations between the United States and Cambodia

pursuant to the trade agreement described in section 2(b).

Approved September 25, 1996.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000381

26-OCT-2017

09:56 AM
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA
- 2011
- 0471 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010
-NM
- 219
- AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.
Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**