alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.2

 

Report of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

The Trust & Securities Services departmentof Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas:

 

We have examined the accompanying management’sassertion, that the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas (collectively the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Honda Auto Receivables 2009-2 Owner Trust asset-backed securitiestransaction, the Honda Auto Receivables 2010-3 Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction and the Honda Auto Receivables 2012-2Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i),1122(d)(2)(iii)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicableto the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2013. With respect to the Platform,servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances. Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance based onour examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on atest basis, evidence about the Company*’*s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing suchother procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either priorto or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertionthat the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2013, is fairly stated,in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

May 24, 2013
# C_2008186EN.01000602.xml

| 23.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5179 — Eramet/Tinfos)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 186/04)

On 3 July 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5179. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5179. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# C_2008234EN.01000801.xml

| 12.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 September 2008

(2008/C 234/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3934 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 148,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4565 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79410 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5135 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5857 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 127,88 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0970 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,630 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 241,16 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7050 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,4223 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6138 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,280 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7690 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7524 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4950 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8673 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1506 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0142 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 550,16 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5798 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5399 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1161 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 132,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8400 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,820 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,9635 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,449 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5243 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 14,8690 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3934

JPY

Japanese yen

148,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4565

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79410

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5135

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5857

ISK

Iceland króna

127,88

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0970

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,630

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

241,16

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7050

PLN

Polish zloty

3,4223

RON

Romanian leu

3,6138

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,280

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7690

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7524

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4950

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8673

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1506

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0142

KRW

South Korean won

1 550,16

ZAR

South African rand

11,5798

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5399

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1161

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 132,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8400

PHP

Philippine peso

65,820

RUB

Russian rouble

35,9635

THB

Thai baht

48,449

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5243

MXN

Mexican peso

14,8690

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Federal Railroad Administration 

Grant/Cooperative Agreement Final Performance Report

A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of 

information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB 

Control Number for this information collection is 2130-0615. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 8 hours per response, 

including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, completing and reviewing the collection of 

information. All responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of 

information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Clearance Officer (RAD-20), Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, Washington, DC. 20590. 

([SLUHV01/31/2025 20%&RQWURO1R

A. Award Information

1. Agreement Number: 2. Project Title:

3. Project Type: 4. Program Name:

5. Grantee: 6. Point of Contact (POC) Name and Title:

7. POC Email: 8. POC Phone:

9. Report Submission Date: 10. Grant Manager:

B. Final Performance Report

11. Project Objectives:

12. Project Activities:

13. Project Outputs:

14. Project Outcomes and Other Public Benefits:



FRA F 33

If the Final Performance Report requires more space than available on this form, please attach a separate document to this report. 
Federal Railroad Administration

Grant/Cooperative Agreement Final Performance Report

14 (a). Performance Measures (if applicable):

15. Lessons Learned:

16. Maximizing Investments:

17. Budget Narrative & Final Budget:

18. Grantee Feedback:

Certification of Authorized Representative

I have reviewed this report and certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the above report accurately and completely 

reflects the scope and accomplishments of the grant or cooperative agreement to the project end date. 

_______________________________ ___________________________

 

Name, Title

Authorized Representative

Signed this MM/DD/YYYY

2 

FRA F 33
# C_2007247EN.01002302.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/23

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2007 — Consorzio per la tutela del formaggio Grana Padano v OHIM — Biraghi (GRANA BIRAGHI)

(Case T-291/03) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark GRANA BIRAGHI - Protection of the designation of origin ‘grana padano’ - Lack of generic nature - Article 142 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92)

(2007/C 247/34)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Consorzio per la tutela del formaggio Grana Padano (Desenzano del Garda, Italy) (represented by: P. Perani, P. Colombo and A. Schmitt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Buffolo and O. Montalto, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Italian Republic (represented by G. Aiello, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance, being: Biraghi SpA, (Cavallermaggiore Italy) (represented by F. Antenucci, F. Giuggia, P. Mayer and J.-L. Schiltz, lawyers)

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance, being:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 June 2003 (Case R 153/2002-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Consorzio per la tutela del formaggio Grana Padano and Biraghi SpA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 16 June 2003 (Case R 153/2002-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 16 June 2003 (Case R 153/2002-1);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Consorzio per la tutela del formaggio Grana Padano; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Consorzio per la tutela del formaggio Grana Padano;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic and Biraghi SpA to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic and Biraghi SpA to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289, 29.11.2003.

1

---
.STUD YAWA YPROGRAM S COLLliCr E O F SOCIA L SCIENC E MICHIGA N STAT E UNIVEKSM Y 22 1 RERKEYHAl. L EASTLANSIN G • MICIIICiA N •48824-11 1 I I'HONf i 1517 ) 353-177 0 • TAX'
. ( 517)432- 1 I W E-Mail : >han'rvig'mMi.ed u 

### n \ l 

### FE? ! l b 3 i : U b

h'ebruar>'9 , 201 2

Docke t Managemen t Facilit y U S Dep t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yS E Wes t Building , Gran d Floor , Roo m W-1204 0 Washington , DC"20590 ' ~ - - - . - ^
_ RE : Docke t No
. FAA-2012-008 9 T o Who m I t Ma yConcern , Thi s lette ri s i n suppor t o fSu n Countr yAirline s continuin g t o us e Reaga n Airpor t i n Washington , D C a s a landin g space . A s a coordinato ro fMichiga n Stat e Universit yinternshi p programs , w e ar e abl e t o provid e ou rstaf fan d severa l student s th e convenienc e an d lo wcos t o fthi s grea t sen/ice
. Usin g Su n Countr yan d flyin g int o Reagan , significantl yreduce s th e cost s fo rou rWashington , D C progra m students , no t t o mentio n th e tim e i t saves . Pleas e allo wthi s grea t servic e t o continue
. Sincerely ,

Vick i Shave r Progra m Coordinato r Stud yAwa yProgram s

,-•'•', ' ; •=':':. •T
No. 50208.

#### Protest 939219-G of East Asiatic Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the items of merchandise in question were held dutiable as claimed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6737

OLUDARE OGUNDE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-404-AM) Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 19, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oludare Ogunde, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Oludare Ogunde seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to vacate and amend the judgment filed ostensibly under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); see Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 370 (4th Cir. 2004) (holding the certificate of appealability requirement applies to appeals of denials of motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ogunde has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with GM on June 23, 2011

FROM: Don Kopinski

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a phone meeting held on June 23, 2011 between GM and EPA

staff. The following people attended:

GM: Steve Fornetti

EPA: Angela Cullen, Chris Nevers, Chuck Moulis, Byron Bunker, Cle Jackson, Don 

Kopinski

The discussion focused on loose engine and incomplete vehicle requirements for the HD GHG 

program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1304735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3077206
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    1654553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6737862
<PP&E>                                        11868195
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5244176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                15573756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3555061
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        258933
<OTHER-SE>                                     9517497
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  15573756
<SALES>                                        5424243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5424243
<CGS>                                          3534777
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4543877
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 39716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               40011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 800639
<INCOME-TAX>                                    333200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             467439
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    467439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008127EN.01001201.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/12

---

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1564/2005 establishing standard forms for the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of notices in the framework of public procurement procedures — Correction to the address of the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities and of the ‘SIMAP’ public procurement website

Official Journal of the European Union

(2008/C 127/12)

The Annexes to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1564/2005 of 7 September 2005 establishing standard forms for the publication of notices in the framework of public procurement procedures pursuant to Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council need to be updated to take account of the replacement of the EU institutions' domain name ‘eu.int’ by ‘europa.eu’.

As from now, the e-mail address of the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, to which notices for publication must be sent, and the address of the SIMAP site, given in the letterhead of each of the 13 Annexes, must be modified as follows:

| EUROPEAN UNION |
| --- |
| Publication of Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union |
| 2, rue Mercier |
| L-2985 Luxembourg |
| Fax (352) 29 29 42 670 |
| E-mail: ojs@publications.europa.eu |

EUROPEAN UNION

Publication of Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

2, rue Mercier

L-2985 Luxembourg

Fax (352) 29 29 42 670

E-mail: ojs@publications.europa.eu

Info & on-line forms: http://simap.europa.eu

The amendment will be made subsequently by means of a formal act amending Regulation (EC) No 1564/2005.

---
EXHIBIT 10.2


 


2008 ANNUALIZED SALARY RATE OF


THOMAS C. ADAMS, JR.


 


At August 15, 2008, the annualized salary rate for 2008 of Thomas C. Adams, Jr. is $350,000.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 369]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 4068]]

Public Law 111-369
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 28, United States Code, to require the Attorney General 
  to share criminal records with State sentencing commissions, and for 
         other purposes. <<NOTE: Jan. 4, 2011 -  [H.R. 6412]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Access to 
Criminal History Records for State Sentencing Commissions Act of 
2010. 28 USC 1 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Criminal History Records 
for State Sentencing Commissions Act of 2010''.
SEC. 2. ATTORNEY GENERAL TO SHARE CRIMINAL RECORDS WITH STATE 
                    SENTENCING COMMISSIONS.

    Section 534(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after ``, the States'' the following: ``, including State 
sentencing commissions''.

    Approved January 4, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6412:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Dec. 7, 9, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2008301EN.01000401.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/4

---

Appointment of the First Advocate General

(2008/C 301/05)

The Court of Justice appointed Ms Sharpston as First Advocate General for a period of one year from 7 October 2008 to 6 October 2009, pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

---
## Summary of Interagency Working Com ments on Draft Language under

EO12866 Interagency Review.  Subje ct to Further Policy Review.

1 EPA NPRM: Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule Step 3,

GHG Plantwide Applicability Limitations and GHG Synthetic Minor Limitations

p. 49 Include comment bubble JES90 in footnote.

p.50 Comment JES101 seems to contradict the phrase “unless EPA stipulates otherwise”. Please explain

in the text or footnote the degree of discretion implied by EPA’s ability to stipulate otherwise. Can EPA

stipulate whatever it wants, or does it face some constraints?

p.51 comment JES108 contradicts the statement at the top of page 49 that states “can only issue a PAL

to a GHG

‐ only source when the source proposes to undertake such a change”. In your comment you

state that it is only after the change occurs. Which is it? Either correct p 49 or or change p.51 from “(1)

issue PALs to GHG

‐ only sources ;” to “(1) issue PALs to GHG

‐ only sources that are not proposing to

increase emissions by 75,000 tpy CO2e ;”

p.59 typo “inder” to “under”

p.59 please clarify in text what the “enhanced recordkeeping reporting and monitoring” of a PAL are.

This makes it sound like there is more monitoring, etc, whereas the earlier discussion seems to imply

that the rule would reduce monitoring. Do you mean “reduced” instead of “enhanced”?

p.64 comment JES136 suggests that calling a source a “synthetic minor” does not make it a “minor”,

since its emissions will still be larger than the “minor” threshold. So it will be treated as a minor source

for a conventional pollutant would be, while still being above the minor threshold? Please clarify in text.