Sawtooth Bridges Replacement Project 

Appendix 3 – A – 5 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
.

d.",-

~ ."

02·8810-75-51

REV. NO.1

Q. -

~

~

Q

"

~

q

II

IJ

I

II

I]

I

III

I

I

I

QFINAL DRAFT

SITE INSPECTION REPORT

KEEGAN LANDFILL

KEARNY, NEW JERSEY'

PREPAREDUNDER

TeCHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-8810-75

CONTRACT NO. 68-01·7346

FORTHE

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESDIVISION

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

SEPTEMBER 15,1989

(REVISED SEPTEMBER29, 1989)

NUS CORPORATION

SUPERFUND DIVISION

SUBMITIED BY:

DONALD P. HESSEMER

fu~

PROJECT MANAGER

REVIEWED/APPROVED BY:

TAMARA MARQUART

SITE MANAGER

. ~ /--B.~ r ~N

RONALD M. NAMAN

FIT OFFICE MANAGER

CCA00004·5
,,~ .... '\10. i •

\~ . SITE NAME:

, ADDRESS:'

Keegan Landfill

Bergen Avenue

Kearny, New Jersey07032

EPA IDNO.:

LATITUDE:

LONGITUDE:

NJD981490428

40°45' 27" N

74° 08' 07- W

1.0 SITE SU M MARY

The Keegan Landfill Site is an approximately 23Q-acretract of land in an industrial section of Kearny,

Hudson County, 'New Jersey. The site is bordered on the south and northwest by Conrail railroad

tracks, on the southwest by businessesalong Bergen Avenue, and on the northeast by a large

wetlands lake. There are rlMidential neighborhoods .nearby, as approximately 20,000 people live

within 1 mile and 223,000 people live within 3 miles of the site.

The site is the property of the Town of Kearny, but the operator of the landfill was John P.

Keegan/Municipal Sanitary landfill Authority (MSLA). KeeganlMSLA leased the land from the Town

of Kearny and operated it as a municipal landfill from the mid 1960s to 1974. Some construction

debris, such asconcrete and stone, aswell as tree branches and limbs, are still being disposed of at the

site. There is also unauthorized dumping occurring, as the site is littered with abandc:>nedfurniture,

appliances, and automobiles. The site is not fenced except for a locked gate at the main Bergen

Avenue entrance. Therefore, the potential for direct contact with exposed wastes exists. The Kearny

\ c

Health Department reported that a member of the Kearny Police Department had worked as a truck ,

driver for Dupont Chemical in Newark in the 1960s. He reported that every morning at least one

truck with approximately forty 3Q-gallon drums went to the Keegan ~~' These wastes included

chromate and bichromate slurry, pigment wastes, and organic wastes. Disposal of these wastes took

place in various areas of the landfill. Approximately 10 drums were observed on site during an offsite reconnaissance conducted by Malcom Pirnie, Inc., on April 28, 1986; however, during the NUS

Corporation Region 2 FIT site inspection conducted on April 25, 1989, no evidence of the drums was

present.

There is no information available on the quantity of wastes deposited on site or the location of the

hazardous waste dumping areas. There have been several underground fires on site, most recently in ! .•

June and July of 1987. The site is crossedby an unnamed creek and Frank Creek, which originates on

site. Thesetwo creeks converge south of the site, and flow into the PassaicRiver.

In a letter dated July 2, 1987, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP)

recommended that a closure plan be submitted. On July 28, 1987, the NJDEPmet with Neglia

Engineering Associates to discussthe closure of sections of Keegan landfill. Neglia Engineering

Associates recommended that the accessroad be improved to provide a turnaround area, that the

area of the recently extinguished firlM be covered with 2 feet of cover, and that the accessroad from

Bergen Avenue be secured The current statu..of the closure plan is unknown.

.\

11

I

I

!
tl

I{

--

[]"

•

•

II

•

.,4•

Il

•

•

•

•

•

•

,.

.

02·8810-75-SI

Rev.No. 1 ~

On April 25, 1989, NUSCorporation Region 2 FITpersonnel collected seven surface water samples and

six sediment samples at the Keegan Landfill Site. These samples were collected to determine the

presence or absenceof Target Compound List (TCl) substances, and the potential for these substances

to migrate off site. Results of this sampling indicate the presence of mercury, lead, chromium,

polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),and several semivolatile compounds in various sediment samples.

Seve@1inorganic compounds, including mercury, lead, and chromium, were detected in surface

water samples collected in Frank Creek.

Ref. Nos. " 2, 3, 4, 14-22

TIERRA-A-017332
~

r

I

02-8810· 75·51

Rev. No. T

2.0 SITE INSPECTION NARRATIVE

2.1 EXISTING ANALYTICAL DATA

It is unknown whether any sampling has been performed at the Keegan Landfill Site prior to the NUS

Corporation Region 2 FIT site inspection on April 2S, 1989.

r

Ref. Nos. " 2

,

2.2 WASTE SOURCE DESCRIPTION

I

The Keegan Landfill is approximately 230 acres in size. This site was used as a municipal landfill from

the mid 1960s to 1974. Construction debris, such as concrete and stone, as well as tree branches and

limbs are still being disposed of at the site. Also scattered throughout the site are abandoned

automobiles, appliances, and furniture. The landfill is unlined and there have ,been reports of

chromate and bichromate slurry, organic wastes, and pigment wastes being dumped on site .. The

quantities and location where these substances were disposed of are unknown: During a 1986 offsite reconnaissance by Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., approximately 10 drums were reported along the eastern

access road. The contents and condition of these drums are unknown.

I

There have been a number of fires beneath t~e surface of the landfill which recurred periodically,

venting smoke from the landfill surlace. In July 1987, the NJDEP recommended that a closure plan be

submitted for the Keegan Landfill Site. Neglia Engineering Associates met with the NJDEP and

recommended that the areas of recently extinguished fires be covered with 2 feet of cover. At the

time of the NUS Corporation Region 2 FIT site inspection, there was no evidence of any burning waste

or drums on site.

Ref. Nos. 1,2,4,21

2.3 GROUNDWATER ROUTE

The Keegan Landfill Site lies within the Hackensack Meadowlands, a large wetlands area formed by

the action of glaciers and fluctuations in ocean water levels. The bedrOCK in the Hackensack River

Basin is a part of the Newark Group of late Triassic Age. Underlying the Keegan landfill Site is the

Brunswick Formation, which forms the bedrock throughout most of the Hackensack River Basin. The

Brunswick Formation is composed of mudstone. siltstone, sandstone, and conglomerate. In the

southern part of the basin, mudstone is the dominant lithology, and the deposits gradually become

coarser grained northward. The Brunswick Formation is the most important bedrock aquifer in the

TIERRA-A-017333
.~~. - ...y. I

'basin. The water table in this area is assumed to be at or near the ground surface. Groundwater in

the Brunswick Formation occurs in a network of interconnected openings formed along joints and

fractures. Groundwater flow in the area is likely to be southeast toward the Hackensack River.

Unconsolidated deposits overlying the Brunswick Formation consist of till, varved silt and clay,

alluvium, sand, and gravel. Small quantities of groundwater are stored in the till which overlies the

bedrock.

Deposits of varved silt and clay, such as the lake beds that overlie bedrock and till in most of the

meadows, have a poor permeability of approximately 10.5

to 10.7 em/seeand impede the movement,

discharge, and recharge of water. Stratified drift deposits of varved silt and day, as much as 300 feet

thick in the meadows, occur in two troughs which parallel the sides of the basin. The Keegan Landfill

Site lies within the western trough.

Groundwater from the Brunswick Formation in the lower part of the basin is hard to very hard and

highly mineralized. In this area the water quality in both the Brunswick and unconsolidated de~its

is influenced by the water quality of the Hackensack River and Newark Bay. Both the"surface water

and groundwater quality in the lower area is influenced by the disposal of large quantities of sewage

and industrial wastes in the Hackensack Meadows. High concentrations of chloride make the water

in the I~wer Hackensack River unsuitable for municipal and industrial processes,although it is usable

for cooling purposes.

(

,j

I' :

I' ; I; ;

.; !

Iii

t

I.

I ~

There is no potable water collected from groundwater in the area. All municipalities within 3 miles of

the site dr.aw their drinking water from the Wanaque Reservoir, located in northern PassaicCounty.

There are 10 industrial wells and one recreational well within 3 miles of the site, the nearest being

approximately 0.7 mile southwest of the site. This well and nine others withdraw water from the

Brunswick Formation. One well located 1.5 miles southeast of the site withdraws water from the

stratified glacial drift. The recreational well is operated by the EssexCounty ParksDepartment, which

is used to replenish water in a pond in Branch Brook Park located approl(imately 2.7 miles northwest

of the site. This well information is summarized in Table 1. There is a potential for groundwater

contaminatIon since the landfill is unlined and reports have suggested that chromate and bichromate

slurry have been deposited at the site. However, groundwater in the area is not used for potable

water, but only for industrial and recreational purposes.

i 1:1

I'

I

.

The net annual precipitation in the area is approximately 12 inches.

Ref. Nos.2, 7,8,9, 10,11,12,13,24, 2S

.! .

I • .,

I:" '

, I

I I

; :

I: i

I' I

I, .. '

-TIERRA-A-017334"
TABLE 1

I

GROUNDWATER USAGE

WITHIN 3 MilES OF KEEGAN LANDFILL

KEARNY, NEW JERSEY

Distance

From Site Direction Well

~

(Miles) From Site Depth (ft) Aquifer Use

American Ref. Company 1.5 SE 3S Stratified drift Industrial

V. H. Swenson Co., Inc. 0.75 N . 400 Brunswick Formation Industrial

•

Ronson Metals Corp. 1.75 5 300 Brunswick Formation Industrial

! I

Ronson Metals Corp. 2.0 165 Brunswick Formation Industrial

' .

5

•!

Public Service Electric 2.0 SW 216 Brunswick Formation Industrial

, .

New Jersey Bell Telephone 2.25 SW 215 Brunswick Formation .., Industrial

Grand Union Company 2.7 N 300 Brunswick Forma~ion Industrial

International Minerals and 2.0 NNW 400 Brunswick Formation Industrial

Chemicals I' :, ,

, ,

,

Honeycomb Plastics Corp. 0.7 SW 500 Brunswick Formation Industrial I i I

Honeycomb Plastics Corp. 0.7 SW 700 Brunswick Formation Industrial I! ;

1\:

EssexCounty Parks 2.7 NW 450 Brunswick Formation Recreation , ,

:,

I

I'

~.

------------------------TIERRA-A-017335~
.

I

q.

02·8810-75-51

Rev.NO.1

2.4 SURFACE WATER ROUTE

The Keegan landfill Site is located in the surface waters of the Hackensack Meadowlands. The site is

relatively flat with a few small mounds of lessthan 10 feet in height which were probably caused by

the deposition of wastes on site. It is bounded on the northeast by a wetlands lake approximately 15

acres in size. There is an unnamed creek crossing the site, and Frank Creek which originates on site.

Thesetwo creeks converge south of the site, and flow into the PassaicRiver approximately 1 stream

mile south of the site. The PassaicRiver drai':ls into the Hackensack River which floWl into Newark

Bay, and eventually connects with the Atlantic· Ocean. Both the PassaicRiver and Newark Bay are

used for navigational purposes. The Hackensack River lies approximately 2.0 miles east of the site

and is used for navigational purposes by commerical and recreational vessels. These two rivers are

tidal in nature. The 1-year 24·hour rainfall in the area is approximately 2.75 inches. There are no

surface water intakes on the Passaic River, the Hackensack River, or Newark Bay within 3 miles

downstream of the site. There are no habitats of federally endangered specieswithin 1 mile of the

site.

I]

I

There is a potential for surface water to be contaminated by any hazardous substances present on the

site, since the site is located in a wetlands area. The site is also crossed by an unnamed creek and

Frank Creek. which drain into the PassaicRiver and eventually into the Hackensack River and Newark

0\, ._ • ._ •.•

Bay.. Therefore. hazardous substances present on site could easily migrate from the site.

I]

I On April 25, 1989, NUSCorporation Region 2 FITpersonnel collected seven surface water samples and

six sediment samples to determine the presence or absence of TCl substances on site, and the

possbility for migration of any present Tel substances. Sample locations are shown in Figure 3 of

Section 3.0 and analytical data is discussed in Section 4.0 of this report. Results of this sampling

\

indicate the presence of several semivolatile compounds, chromium, lead, mercury. and PCBsin onsite sediments. Several inorganic compounds including chromium, lead, and mercury were detected

in on-~te surface water samples. These inorganics were detected in higher concentrations in the

downstream surface water sample NJG3-SWSthan in the upstream samples NJG3.SW6 and NJG3-

5W7. Since chromate and bichromate slurry were reported to have been disposed of on site.

chromium contamination of surface waters in Frank Creek may be attributed to the sit•. During the

site inspection, a dead fish was observed in the unnamed creek. Also noted on site was an oily sheen

in Frank Creek near sample locations NJG3-SW5and NJG3-5EDS.

q

o

u

I

q

•

Ref. Nos. 1,2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 22, 24, 27

d

TIERRA-A-017336
02·8810·15-51

Rev. No.1

2.5 AIR ROUTE

During the April 25, 1989 site inspection of the Keegan Landfill Site, no air readings above

background conditions were detected on the Organic Vapor Analyzer or the HNu photoionization

detector. There are no National Historic Sites within view of the Keegan landfill Site. 1llere have

been several underground fires reported at the site; however, there is no indication of a potential for

release of hazardous substances to the air.

Ref. Nos. 1, 2

2.6 ACTUAL HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS

A dead fish was observed in the unnamed creek during the NUS Region 2 FIT site inspection on April

25, 1989. Also noted on site was an oily sheen in Frank Creek near sample locations NJG3-5W5 and

NJG3-SEDS. Chromium contamination of surface water was found in Frank Creek. PCBs, lead, and

mercury were also detected in sediments in Frank Creek, the unnamed cre~k. and the wetlands lake.

There is a potential for direct contact with hazardous substances on site since the site is not fenced.

No other actual hazardous conditions pertaining to environmental contamination have been

documented. Specifically:

• Contamination has not been documented either in organisms in a food chain leading to

humans or inorganisms directly consumed by humans.

=I

•

•I

I

•

--

•

•

• There have been no documented observed incidents of direct physical contact with

hazardous substances at the landfill involving a human being or a domestic animal.

• There have been no documented instances of damage to flora (e.g., stressed vegetation)

that can be attributed to hazardous materials on site.

., There is no documented contamination of a sewer or storm drain.

• There is no direct evidence of a release of a substance of concern from the facility to

groundwater.

• There is no threat of explosion on site. although there is a fire hazard. There have been

numerous underground fires reported on site, most recently in June and July of 1987.

Ref. Nos_ 1, 2

-

TIERRA-A-017337
I

t

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

II

•

02-8810-75·51

Rev. No.1

,

""

,

TABLE 2· SUMMARY OF ANALYSES FOR SEDIMENT SAMPLES

Sediment Sample

parameteriunit c: ...... 1 Sed 4 5ed 5 Sed 6 J'llii:W·

Phenanthrene uglkg 5300 4800 p5 ~(~

Fluoranthene uglkg 15,000 4700 JOI~oOIIOO

Pyrene ug/'kg 9600 3500 '"I000 I I"

Benzo (a) anthracene uglkg ¥6900 2000 Jolt bOo

Chrysene uglkg 7300 2400 H~{5~

Benzo(b)fluoranthene uglkg 5800 2300 tJ'

Benzo(k)fluoranthene uglkg 3700 1100 ~p~

Indeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene ugikg 3200 1600 Lf I ~OO

Benzo(a)pyrene uglkg "*"4400 2000 ·~IIOO

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene uglkg 2700 2000 ~r,

Aroclor - 1254 uglkg 12600 E 'i-14QO E ~4ioOE ~/P

Aroclor - 1260 uglkg ¥2400 E ~1600 E

Mercury mgJkg 0.7 2.6 8.7 2.3 ?-11)

\

'020"'" '1S0..f: lea~ mglkg 305 479 ~6J

Chromium mglkg 13.3 93.6 114 116

E - estimated value

TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF ANALYSES FOR SURFACEWATER SAMPLES

Surface Water Sample

Parameter/unit SW-5 SW·6. SW·7

Aluminum ugiL 2170 E 444 E, 467 E

Barium ugiL 445 211,212

Chromium ugJL 21.6E 4.6*.4.2*

Copper ugiL 95.2 E

Iron ugiL 11,900 2550,2630

Lead ugiL 159 43.9,42.8

Manganese ugJL 484 224,220

Mercury ugJL 1.2

Zinc uglL 339 45.4,47.7

* _estimated value. compound present below CRDL, but above IDL.

e - estimated value

blank space - compound analyzed for but not detected

TIERRA-A-017338
LEGEND

• SURFACE WATER SAMPLE

• SEDIMENT SAMPLE

ALL SAMPLE NUMBERS

PRECEDED BY NJG3

I

\

\

\

\\

\~

~

~

Cl

,.

~

-<

• SW1

• SEDt

\

~SW2

\

\

,

)

SAMPLE LOCATION MAP

KEEGAN LANDFILL. KEAR NY, N.J.

(NOT TO SCALE)

f\t:: \I. 110. 1

WETLANDS LAKE

EXIT 15W NJTP

FIGURE 3

212 au -

TIERRA-A-017339
\JZ·~ 11,)- i 5-)1

Rev.NO.1

4.0 SITE INSPECTION SAMPLING RESULTS

NUS Corporation conducted a site inspection of Keegan Landfill on April 25, 1989. at which time

seven surface water samples and six sediment samples were collected. These samples were collected

to determine the presence or absenceof Tel substanceson site. Sample locations are shown in Figure

3, Section 3.0. The results of the analysesfor the sediment and surface water samples are summarized

in Tables 2 and 3. A complete list of sample parameters and analytical results is presented in

Reference No. 22.

I

I

I

I

Several additional semivolatile compounds were detected in sediment samples NJG3·SED1.NJG3-

SE03, NJG3·SEDS,and NJG3-SED6,but were below contract required Quantitation LimiU (CRQL). The

downstream sample NJG3-SEDSwas found to contain greater concentrations of several semivolatile

compounds, lead, and mercury than the upstream sample NJG3-SED6. Sediment samples NJ63-SED1,

SEDS,and SED6also contained PCBs. Sediment samples NJG3-SED4and NJG3-SEO"Salso contained

estimated concentrations of tetrachloroethane of 68 uglkg and 17 uglkg. respectively. Sediment

sample NJG3-SED4contained an estimated concentration of 100 uglkg of xylenes. These volatiles

we~e not detected in any of the other sediment samples.

\

Surface water samples NJG3-SWSand NJG3-SW6,7, collected from Frank Creek. contained inorganic

concentrations from 2 to 35 times the concentrations found in the other surface water samples

collected. The downstream surface water sample NJG3-5W5 contained concentrations of inorganic

compounds asmuch asfive times the concentrations found in upstream samples NJG3-SW6,7. I

I Ref. Nos. 2, 22

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

TIERRA-A-017340
I

I

I

J

•

•

[J

•

•

II

,-

~

~

•

III

02·8810-75-51

Rev.No.1

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Thissite poses a potential threat of contamination of surface waters. Hazardous su~tances reported

as being disposed of on site are chromate and bichromate slurry, organic waste, and pigment waste.

Analyses of surf~~,,-wat'L samples collected at the K~,~D Landfill Site indicate concentrations.of

chromium significantly greater in a downstream surface water sample than in an upstream sample.

Se",tvotatile contaminants were detected in higher concetdtations in the downstrearnHdhniitt~

;;~pl~of frank pee~th~rin ,the upstream 'Sfdiment SampliS'~ However, the downstream samples,

. --.-'.. ;; - ,-",' .;-'-{"'''i~' (_~.t....-_--..:~.ti..."':.).~

NJG3-SW5and NJG3-SEDS,were collected next to a railroad trestle; therefore, these contaminanu

may possibly be attributed to another source.

Groundwater in the area is not used for potable water, but solely for industrial use. The site is located

,in surface water, but there are no surface water intakes within 3 miles downstream of the site. The

Hackensack River, located approximately 2.0 miles east of the site, is used for navigation by

commercial and recreational vessels.

.

\,There is a potential for direct contact with hazardous su~nces present on site. sin(t thi·ii.~· .

'fenced. Based on the recreational targets from the Hackensack River and the potential for direct

contact, this site is recommended for a MEDIUM PRlOIU'rl::rotfurthef.ai_9it ..iA.!~".~;~J

installed around the site to limit access to the la~~~~~_:~i.~~~~~~:m:j1~~I~~~

should be collected from Frank Creek to determine if the contaminanu present are attributable to

the site or another source.

Ref. Nos. 1,2,4,8, 10, 11,22,25,26

TIERRA-A-017341
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

!I

I

I

02·8810-75-51

Rev.NO.1

6.0 REFERENCES

,. Preliminary Assessment,Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. May 5, 1986.

2. Field Notebook No. 0381, Keegan landfill, TOO No. 02-8810-75, Site Inspection, NUS

Corporation Region2 FIT,Edison, New Jersey. December 19, 1988.

3. General Sciences Corporation, Graphical Exposure Modeling System (GEMS), Landover,

Maryland, 1986.

4. Three-Mile Vicinity Map for Keegan landfill, based on U.S.G.S. Topographic Maps 7.5

Minute Series, ·Orange, N.J. Quadrangle," 1955 photorevised 1981, "Weehawken, N.J.

Quadrangle,· 1967 photorevised 1981, "Elizabeth, N.J. Quadrangle,· 1967 photorevised

1981, and" JerseyCity, N.J.Quadrangle, If 1967photorevised 1981.

5. U.S. Department of the Interior, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, Report on

the Quality of the Interstate Waters of the lower PassaicRiver and Upper and lower Baysof

New York Harbor, November 1969.

6. New Jersey Department of Conservation and Economic Development, HackenSackMeadows

Comprehensive PlanTechnical Report No. 2A, Definition of the Meadows, March 15, 1965.

7.,

i

\

8. \

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

1 S.

16.

17.

County of Bergen, New Jersey, Office of the County Engineer Feasibility Study and Report of

a Hackensack RiverDam. October 1966.

Uncontrolled hazardous waste site ranking system, A user's manual, 40 CFR Part 300,

Appendix A, 1986.

Suszkowski, Dennis 1. Sedimentology of Newark Bay, New Jersey: An Urban Estuarine Bay,

June 1978.

Telecon Note: Conversation between Ms. Carole Schmidt, Kearny Water Department, and

David Heim, NUSCorp., July 6,1989.

Telecon Note: Conversation between Mr. Vince Bucci, EssexCounty Parks Department, and

David Heim, NU5Corp., July 7, 1989.

. New Jersey Geological Survey, Department of Environmental Protection, Bedrock Map of

the HackensackMeadows, 1959, revised 1962.

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP),Bureau of Water Allocation,

Water Withdrawal Points and NJGSCaseIndex Site within 5.0 miles of latitude 40° 44' 53-,

longitude 74° 06' 48-, O~ober 19, 1988.

Letter from Edward J. Londres. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, to

Henry J. Hill, Mayor of Kearny, July 2, 1987.

letter from JamesA. Rogers, James C. Anderson Associates, Inc., to Henry Hill, Mayor of

Kearny, July7, 1987.

Letter from JosephE. Neglia, Town Engineer, Town of Kearny, to Mayor and Council, Town

of Kearny, August 28, 1987.

letter from Robert Ferraiuolo, Hudson Regional Health Commission, to Henry Hill, Mayor of

Kearny, July 14, 1987.

TIERRA-A-017342
-

]

I

I

J

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

II

II

I

•

•

•

•

•

18.

19.

20.

21.

. 22.

23.

24.

\

\

25.

\

26. :

27.

02-8810-75-SI

Rev. NO.1

6.0 REFERENCES (Cont'd)

Letter from Edward Grosvenor, Health Officer, Town of Kearny, to Henry Hill, Mayor of

Kearny, July 21, 1987.

Letter from John P. Sarnas, Assistant Health Officer, Town of Kearny, to Henry Hill, Mayor of

Kearny, July 23, 1987.

Letter from John A. Castner, NJDEP to John P. Sarnas, Assistant Health Officer, Kearny

Department of Health and Environmental Protection, August 25,1987.

Kearny Department of Public Health and Environmental Protection Memos regarding

landfill fire dated June 25, 26,29,30 and July 1,2,6,7,8,9,10,1987.

U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, PEl Associates, Inc., and York Laboratories, Case No .

11834, Laboratory Analysis from NUS Corporation Region 2 FIT Site Inspection conducted on

April 25, 1989.

New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places, June 1, 1980.

Carswell, L.D. Appraisal of Water Resources in the Hackensack River Basin, New Jersey.' U.S.

Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations 76-74. June 1976.

Telecon Note: Conversation between Mr. Michael Beard, Kearny Health Department, and

Gerald Gilliland, NUS Corp., April 20, 1989. ..

Telecon Note: Conversation between Lt. Ronald Johnstone, Kearny Police Department, and

Gerald Gilliland, NUS Corp., April 25, 1989.

U.S. Department of the Interior. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlantic Coast Ecological

Inventory, New York (N.Y.-Conn.-N.J.), 1980.

TIERRA-A-017343
5:1 ~/2;

FINAL

SITE INSPECTION PRIORITIZATION REPORT

KEEGAN LANDFILL

KEARNY, HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

CERCLIS ID No.: NJD981490428

VOLUME 1 OFJ

Prepared for:

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION II

DCN: START-02-F-OI09J

TDD No.: 02-96-11-0044

EPA Contract No.: 68-W5-0019

JULY 1998

Prepared by:

Region II Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team

Roy F. Weston, Inc.

Federal Programs Division

Edison. :\Iew Jersey 08837

CCAOOOOS1

TIERRA-A-017344
DeN: START-02-F-OI093

FINAL

SITE INSPECTION PRIORITIZATION REPORT

KEEGAN LANDFILL

KEARNY, HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

CERCLIS ID No.: NJD981490428

Prepared by:

Region II Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team

Roy F. Weston. Inc.·

Federal Programs Division

Edison. New Jersey

prepared for:

UNITED STATES ENVIRON1\tIENT AL PROTECTION AGENCY

EPA Contract No.: 68-W5-0019

TDD No.: 02-96-11-0044

Document Control No.: START-02-F-01093

JUNE 1998

SUBMITTED BY:

Date ,,~R"

Date 7;/7/~

I 1

KEEGAN.SIP

TIERRA-A-017345
SITE SUMMARY

The Keegan Landfill (Keegan) site (a.k.a. MSLA Site B) is located at the foot of Bergen Avenue in a

predominantly industrial section of Kearny, Hudson County, New Jersey (Ref. Nos. 1; 3, p. 3). Figures

1 and 2 provide a Site Location Map and Site Map, respectively. The Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCUS) list notes that the site is located

in Congressional District No. 11; however, the actual district is No. 09 (Ref. Nos. I, p. 1; 2, p. 3). The

unfenced property encompasses aPF\"'ximately 230 acres. The site is bordered on the north and west by

Conrail railroad tracks; on the southwest by businesses along Bergen Avenue, including a scrap metal

facility; on the south by Harrison Avenue; and on the southeast and east by wetland areas and a tidal

open-water wetland (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 3, 64; 4; 7). Primary site access was formerly gained through two

entrances from Bergen Avenue. An additional access road originates at Harrison Avenue, located south

of the site (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 3, 12; 7). The three entrances are currently barricaded with concrete

roadway dividers (Ref. No. 7). One makeshift shelter exists on site; it is unknown if the shelter is

occupied (Ref. No. 24, p. 3). Another east-west Conrail rail line crosses the southern portion of the site

(Ref. No.4). One creek, Frank Creek, originates on site. The creek flows south and eventually

discharges to the Passaic River, which is located 'A-mile south of the former Harrison Avenue site

entrance. The unnamed creek identified in the September 1989 Site Inspection (51) Report is actually an

open-water wetland area that is contiguous with other site wetlands (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 3, 8, 12, 64; 4; 24,

p.3).

"'~"".

.... ~\~

The Town of Kearny (the "Town") owns the property, which was leased to John P. Keegan/Municipal

Sanitary Landfill Authority (KeeganlMSLA). From the mid-1960s to 1974, KeeganlMSLA operated an

unlined municipal landfill at the site; operations ceased at the request of the Hackensack Meadowlands

Development Commission (HMDC) (Ref. No.3, p. 41). Keegan/MSLA no longer leases the property

(Ref. No. 7). A 1986 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Preliminary Assessment (PA) Report noted the on-site

presence of approximately 10 drums; the drums' location and contents, if any, are unknown (Ref. No.3,

pp. 3, 36). During the 1989 U.S. Envirorunental Protection Agency (EPA) Region II Field Investigation

Team (FI1j SI, personnel noted the occurrence of ongoing disposal of cardboard waste, construction

waste, household refuse, and landscaping debris (e.g., leaves, tree branches). During the inspection,

AT personnel also noted the presence of abandoned tires, appliances, and automobiles (Ref. No.3, pp.

65, 67, 68). The drums observed during the April 1986 PA off-site reconnaissance were not observed

during the SI on-site activities (Ref. No.3, pp. 65 through 70).

In addition to landfill activities, illegal dumping of various materials and wire burning have occurred on

site (Ref. No.3, pp. 38, 45, 199). A Kearny Police Department officer, who worked as a truck driver

for DuPont Chemical of Newark during the 1960s, stated that for approximately 7 years, a daily delivery

of approximately forty 30-ga11on drums of waste was disposed of on the Keegan property. Drums of

waste were reportedly both deposited intact or emptied onto the ground surface. Drum contents included

plating wastes, such as chromate and bichromate slurry; pigment wastes; and organic wastes (Ref. No.

3, p. 383).

In December 1981, December 1984, June/July 1987, and most recently in 1992, underground fires

occurred at the site (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 44, 46, 204 through 213; 7). On July 2, 1987, the New Jersey

Department of Envirorunental Protection (NJDEP) cited fires as a recurring problem and recommended

that the Town submit a closure plan for the landfill (Ref. No.3, p. 182). In July 1987, the Town of

Kearny contracted Neglia Engineering Associates (Neglia) to provide closure guidance for the

extinguished portions of the landfill. In August 1987, Neglia provided the following recommendations:

1) improvement of the access road by eliminating depressions and providing a turnaround area, 2)

deposition of two feet of compacted cover and seed layer on the extinguished areas, and 3) securing of

the access road from Bergen Avenue, securing of a roadway easement for the access road situated on lots

. .'

TIERRA-A-017346
TRUCKING

BUSINESS

(.iPP30JIKAn lICALZ)

700 0 7CO

p-~ [

1 inch - 700 ft.

nGum: 2 - SITE !UP

IXEG.lN LA."'lDnu.

I:E.UINT. NO lERSSY

JULy 1007

os ENVIBONlaNTAL PROTECTION .lGINCY __ ..-rJHJ __ lLW

--,_. Roy F. Weston, Inc.

FEDERAL PROGRAWS DIVISION DRAli'N BY : J. HAiII'TON .R.

...--A. III1lI PRe IIl-..EHTAL ~ IIlC..

c:.c. .......:N II MAUtO'1RA. P.c:. II!3I:lI.R::E N'PlJI:o\ 'IICNS. IMe..

IlL SMlllIRA _'lIS, NO _ ~ llElNCES. IHe.
DeN: START-O::!-F-DI093

" '," • ,i· t

FIGURE 1

SITE LOCATION

MAP

. t

- - -

£) NEW

JERSEY

~U.a.oR"'NGL£ LOCATION

QUAD] ORANGE. N.J

EPAPM

MOYIK \\/~~ Roy F. Weston, Inc.

l~~~~r~ FEDERALPROGRAMSDIVISION

1

II

I §

I

L_, _

I

I

START PM

CAMPBELL

KEEGAN LANDFILL

KEARNY. NJ

IN ASSOClAllON WITH RESOURCEAPPUCAllON.lnc.

C.C. JOHNSON & MAlHOTRA. P.C •• R.E. SARRJERA ASSOClATES.

PRC ENVIRONMENTAl. MANA~ENT. AND GRB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.

KEEGAN. SIP 2 TIERRA-A-017348
DeN: START-02-F-Ol093

owned by Hudson Meadows Urban Renewal Corporation, and cessation of illegal dwnping on these lots

(Ref. No.3, pp. 188, 189). As of June 1997, the Town has improved the access road and secured the

three site entrances from vehicular traffic. The site property is currently involved in litigation between

the Town and the HMDC; the HMDC is attempting to procure the property. Dependent upon the

outcome of court proceedings, HMDC plans to utilize the property initially as a construction/demolition

debris landfill; after proper closure, HMDC plans to develop the property into a recreational park (Ref.

No. 7).

On April 25, 1989, as part of 51 activities, Region nFIT collected a total of seven surface water samples

and six sediment samples from on-site surface water bodies. Samples were obtained from the openwater wetland, the "ulUlamed creek," and Frank Creek (Ref. No.3, pp. 4, 13). Analytical results of the

sediment samples indicate the presence of elevated concentrations of semivolatile organic compounds,

polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and metals (mercury, lead, and chromium). Elevated concentrations

of mercury, lead, and chromium were also detected in the Frank Creek surface water samples (Ref. No.

3, pp. 4, 216 through 220). Additional analytical data collected on site by IT Corporation in 1994

indicate the presence of elevated concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and metals in

groundwater (Ref. Nos. 9, p. 37; 10, p. 3). In addition, analytical data of surface soil samples indicate

the presence of VOCs; semivolatile organic compounds, such as phthalates and polynUclear aromatic

hydrocarbons (PAHs); pesticides; PCBs; dioxin; petroleum hydrocarbons; and inorganic analytes, such

as alwninwn, barium, chromiwn, iron, lead, mercury, and cyanide (Ref. Nos. 9, p. 34; 10, p. 2).

On July 30-31, 1997, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Region II Superfund

Technical Assessment and Response Team (START) conducted sampling at the site as part of Site

Inspection Prioritization (SIP) activities. START collected a total of 13 sediment samples, 3 surface

water samples, and 4 soil samples (Ref. No. 24, p. 16). Analytical data of soil and sediment samples

indicate the on-site presence of phthalates, pesticides, and metals at concentrations significantly above

background (Ref. No. 25, pp. 14 through 16, 18 through 23, 26 through 28, and 337 through 339).

During the sampling event, START personnel observed the following conditions/events on and adjacent

to the site: leachate at the headwaters of Frank Creek, an ash pile located at the end of the westernmost

access road, a variety of debris along all access roads, and recreational use of property/adjacent surface

waters (e.g., a motorcyclist, person in a kayak, apparent boat launch area) (Ref. No. 24, pp. I, 3

through 5. 10).

Although there is a potential for a release of contaminants to groundwater, drinking water supplies

within the site vicinity are obtained from sources greater than 4 miles from the site (Ref. Nos. 4; 8, p.

23; 11, 12). The July 1997 START analytical data documents a release of site contaminants to adjacent

surface water sediments (Ref. No. 25, pp. 14 through 16, 18 through 23, 26 through 28, and 337

through 339). The eastern adjacent wetland areas are intercormected with the Kearny Marsh, a NJDEP

Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Priority Site and state-listed endangered species habitat (Ref. Nos. 14,

22). The remainder of the surface water migration route is composed of highly industrialized coastal tidal

water bodies (Ref. No.3, pp. 146, 147). Although these surface waters sustain fish populations, stateissued prohibitions and health advisories exist regarding the sale and consumption of specific fishes taken

from these waters (Ref. Nos. 20; 24, p. 18). There are no residences, schools, or day care facilities

within 200 feet of the site boundary (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 3, 12, 49, 51: 4). As no remedial actions

involving removal or containment of on-site wastes have occurred, contaminants associated with the site

may continue to migrate to groundwater and adjacent surface water bodies (Ref. Nos. I, p. 2; 3, p. 29).

KEEGAN. SIP 4

TIERRA-A-017349
DeN: START-02-F-O 1093

SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT: SITE INSPECTION PRIORITIZATION

.. ;..,

l PART I: SITE INFORMATION

1. Site Name! Alias Keegan Landfill (a.k.a. MSLA Sire B)

Street Foot of Bergen Avenue

City Keamy State --=..N..:.=.J__ Zip Code 07032

2. County ..=H:.:.;u=..::ds=.::::on=-- _ County Code 017 Cong.Dist. ....QL

3. CERCLIS ID No. NJD981490428

4. Block Nos. 205; 286 ......::.=.J-=-=~ ~ Lot Nos. 18. 19.24 through 33·; 4

5. Latitude 40° 45' 19" N Longitude 74° 08' 15" W

USGS Quad(s). ---=O;.;:.ran=gi.::.le,~N...:..:J~ _

6. Approximate size of site 230 acres

7. Owner Town of Kearny Telephone No. (201) 955-7979

,:~,~<.

'J Street 402 Keamy Avenue

City Keamy State New Jersey Zip 07032

8. Operator John P. Keegan/Municipal Sanitary Telephone No. (201) 741-1377

Landfill Authority (MSLA) •

Street 18 Somerset Drive

City Rumson State New Jersev Zip 07760

9. Type of Ownership

Private

_County

Federal

.x Municipal

State

Unknown Other ~--

• An access road crosses Lot Nos. 18, 31, 32 of Block 205; the owner of these propenies is Hudson Meadow Urban

Renewal Corporation (Mimi Development) (Ref. No, 3. p. 188).

* The second pany identified as former lessee of Keegan Landfill is William A. Keegan. Jr,. of 411 Bergen Avenue,

Kearny, NJ. (Ref. No.3, p. 43).

.'.

KEEGAN. SIP 5

TIERRA-A-017350
DeN: START -02·F-OI093

PART I: SITE INFORMATION (Continued)

10. Owner/Operator Notification on File

RCRA 3001 Date CERCLA 103c Date

---

X None Unknown

11. Pennit Information

Permit Pennit No. Date Issued Expiration Date Comments

None known.

12. Site Status

Active X Inactive Unknown

13. Years of Operation: mid-1960s to 1974 (as Municipal Landfill)

14. Identify the types of waste sources (e.g., landfill, surface impoundment, piles, stained

soil, above- or underground tanks or containers, land treatment, etc.) on site. Initiate as

many waste unit numbers as needed to identify all waste sources on site.

(a) Waste Sources

Waste Unit No. Waste Source Type Facility Name for Unit

1 Landfill Landfill

Ref. Nos. 1 through 7.

KEEGAN.SIP 6

TIERRA-A-017351
DeN: START-02-F-OI093

PART I: SITE INFORMATION (Continued)

(b) Other Areas of Concern

Identify any miscellaneous spills, dumping, etc. on site; describe the materials and

identify their locations on site.

On August 5. 1980, the Kearny Police Deparonent received information regarding illegal

dumping of hazardous materials; the event allegedly occurred 1 year prior to the police

report. Materials were reportedly dumped in an area southeast of the western Conrail

line and northeast of Bergen Avenue. The Kearny Department of Public Works

excavated four locations to depths from 18 inches to 4 feet. No evidence of deposited

materials was observed. No samples were collected during the investigation of the

incident.

In December 1984, while monitoring an underground landfill fire, a member of the

Kearny Department of Public Health and Environmental Protection (DPHEP) noted that

"a large pile of debris had been ·set on fire over the weekend by someone burning wire."

The location and size of the burn pile are unknown.

Ref. No.3. pp. 45, 47.

15. Describe the regulatory history of the site, including the scope and objectives of any

previous response actions, investigations and litigation by State. Local and Federal

agencies (indicate type. affiliation, and date of investigations).

Local - Underground landfill fires are known to have occurred on site in December

1981, December 1984, June/July 1987, and most recently in 1992. Local agencies,

including the Kearny DPHEP, and Keegan/MSLA personnel have been on site at

these times to conduct and monitor fire-extinguishing efforts (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 44, 46,

204 through 213; 7). During the 1987 fire, NJDEP personnel also visited the site to

monitor fire-extinguishing progress (Ref. No.3, pp. 206, 207, 209, 213).

State - In May 1986 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., a contractor to the NJDEP, conducted a

Preliminary Assessment (PA) of the site. PA activities included the collection of

background information and performance of an off-site reconnaissance. The PA

evaluation indicated that the site, although "non-hazardous" overall, was a medium

priority candidate for further action due to the observance of drums and exposed waste

on the unsecured site (Ref. Nos. 1, p. 2; 3. pp. 34, 35, 40).

As mentioned in the above subsection ("Local"), NJDEP personnel participated in the

monitoring of the June/July 1987 fire. On July 2, 1987, the NJDEP recommended

that the Town submit a landfill closure plan (Ref. No.3, p. 182). In August 1987,

Neglia, under contract to the Town, provided closure recommendations for the

extinguished burn areas (Ref. No.3, pp. 188, 189) .

. "

.\ .J

KEEGAN. SIP 7

TIERRA-A-017352
Des START-02-FJJ!lI93

PART I: SITE INFORMATION (Continued)

Federal _ In April 1989, Region II FIT conducted surface \vaterlsediment sampling

on site as part of a Site Inspection (Sn project. A total of seven surface water samples

and six sediment samples were collected from on-site surface water bodies. Analytical

data indicate the presence of elevated concentrations of semivolatile organic

compounds. PCBs. and metals in sediment samples. Analytical data indicate the

presence of elevated concentrations of the same metals in the Frank Creek· surface

water samples (Ref. No.3, pp. 4, 13, 28). In July 1997, Region II START conducted

environmental sampling at the site. Analytical results of this event are discussed in

the Site Inspection Prioritization subsection of Part III of this report.

a) Is the site or any waste source subject to Petroleum Exclusion? Identify

petroleum products and by-products that justify this decision.

Petroleum products and by-products are not known to have been disposed of at

the site. Therefore, neither the site nor any waste source is subject to petroleum

exclusion provisions under CERCLA.

Ref. No, 3, p. 3.

b) Has normal farming application of pesticides registered under the Federal

Insecticide, Fungicide. and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) occurred at the site? Have

pesticides been produced or stored on site? Have there been any leaks or spills

of pesticides on site?

The site has not been used for agricultural purposes. nor are pesticides known to

have been produced. stored, or spilled on site, However, analytical data of onsite soil and sediment samples collected in July 1997 by Region II START

indicate the presence of pesticides. including 4,4'-DDD. 4,4·-DDE. 4,4'-DDT.

endrin, endrin aldehyde, and chlordane. Similarly, analytical data of sample

collected by IT Corporation indicate the presence of pesticides, including aldrin,

beta-BHC, 4,4'-DDD, 4,4'-DDE. 4.4'-DDT, dieldrin, endrin, endosulfan I,

endosulfan sulfate. heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide. and methoxychlor.

Ref. Nos. 3, p. 3; 9, pp. 34, 35; 10. Attachment C. p. 13, Att:lchment D, pp. 41

through 48, Attachment E, pp. 22 through 25; 25. pp. 26 through 28.

c) Is the site or any waste source subject to RCRA. Subtitle C (briefly explain)?

Neither the site nor any waste source is subject to RCRA Subtitle C. The site

has been inactive as a municipal saID!.1r)'landfill since 1974.

Ref. No.3. p, 3.

KEEGAN.SIP 8

TIERRA-A-017353
DC:-; START-02-F-OI093

PART I: SITE INFORMATION (Continued)

d) Is the site or any waste source maintained under the authority of the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission (NRC)?

Neither the site nor any waste source is maintained under the authority of the

NRC.

Ref. No.3, p. 3.

16. Do any conditions exist on site that would warrant immediate or emergency action?

There are no conditions on site that would warrant immediate or emergency action. The

landfill has been inactive since] 974 and, although there have been underground fires at

the site, the most recent event occurred in 1992.

Ref. Nos. 3, p. 41; 7.

17. Information available from:

Contact Cathv Movik

Preparer Kathv Campbell

Agency U.S. EPA Telephone No.: (212) 637-4339

Agency Re!!ion II START Date: December 1997

KEEGA:.....SIP 9

TIERRA-A-017354
DeN: START·02·F-01093

PART ll: WASTE SOURCE INFOAAIATION

For each of the waste units identified in Part I, complete the following items.

Waste Unit 1 Landfill

Source Type

x Landfill Contaminated Soil

Surface Impoundment Pile

Drums Land Treaunent

Tanks/Containers Other

Description:

1. Describe the types of containers, impoundments or other storage systems (Le., concretelined surface impoundment) and any labels that may be present .

...

_,.;i

The Keegan site is an unlined landfill located in a primarily industrial ponion of Kearny,

New Jersey; the Town of Kearny owns the property. From the mid-1960s to 1974

KeeganlMSLA, the property lessee, operated a municipal sanitary landfill at the site.

Historical information indicates that unauthorized dumping has occurred. Wastes deposited

on site include construction and landscaping debris; cardboard waste; household refuse;

used tires, appliances, and automobiles; and drummed wastes. From 1981 to the present,

four underground landfill fires have occurred on site. While monitoring the December 1984

fire, a Kearny DPHEP member observed the remains of a wire bum pile; its location and

size are unknown.

A Kearny Police Deparnnem member reponed that, while working as a truck driver for

DuPont of Newark in the 1960s, drummed wastes were transported to the site for disposal.

For approximately 7 years, at least one daily delivery of an estimated forty 30-gallon drums

were reportedly deposited both intact and emptied on the site. Drum contents included

plating wastes, such as chromate and bichromate slurry; pigment wastes, and organic

wastes. A 1986 PA Report noted the presence of 10 drums; however, their location and

contents, if any, are unknown. Drums and crushed drums were observed at various

locations during 1997 Region II START SIP on-site sampling activities.

KEEGAN.SIP 10

TIERRA-A-017355
DeN: START-02-F-Ol093

PART II: WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION (Continued)

2. Describe the physical condition of the containers or storage systems (i.e., rusted and/or

bulging metal drums).

N/A

3. Describe any secondary containment that may be present (e.g., drums on concrete pad in

building or above ground tank surrounded by berm).

The Keegan Landfill site is unlined; no secondary containment is present.

Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 3, 35, 38, 41, 44 through 47, 65 through 70, 199, 204 through 213, 383; 7;

8, pp. 28, 61; 24, p. 1,5,12.

Hazardous Waste Quantity

The actual quantity of hazardous waste disposed of at the site is unknown. For the

purposes of this report, the total site acreage (Le., 230 acres) will be utilized as an

estimated hazardous waste quantity value.

Hazardous Substances/Physical State

In July 1997 Region II START collected 13 sediment samples, 4 soil samples, and 3

surface water samples from the site and its vicinity. Analytical data indicate the presence

of phthalates, pesticides, and metals at concentrations significantly above background. As

pan of 1989 51 activities, seven surface water samples and six sediment samples were

collected from on-site surface water bodies. Analytical data of the sediment samples

collected in 1989 indicate the presence of elevated concentrations of semivolatile organic

compounds, such as phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo(a)anthracene. chrysene,

benzo(a)pyrene; PCBs; and metals, such as mercury, lead, and chromium. Analytical data

indicate the presence of elevated concentrations of the same metals in the Frank Creek

surface water samples.

Plating wastes and organic wastes from DuPont were reponedly disposed on site during

the 1960s in slurry and liquid forms. Wastes generated from wire burning are in the

solid/ash state. The physical state of other possible deposited wastes is unknown.

Additional analytical data collected on site by IT Corporation in 1994 indicate the presence

of VOCs and elevated concentrations of metals in groundwater. In addition. analytical

data of surface soil samples indicate the presence of VOCs; semivolatile organic

compounds, such as phthalates and PARs; pesticides; PCBs; dioxin; and inorganic

analytes. such as aluminum, barium, chromium. iron, lead. mercury, and cyanide.

Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 4, 27, 28, 45, 216 through 220, 383; 9, pp. 34, 37; 10, pp. 2, 3; 25, pp.

14 through 16, 18 through 23, 26 through 28, 337 through 339.

KEEGAN. SIP 11

TIERRA-A-017356
DeN: START·02·F·OI093

PART Ill. SAMPLING RESULTS

EXISTING ANALYTICAL DATA

Site Inspection - On April 25, 1989, Region II FIT conducted an 51 at the Keegan site.

Seven surface water samples and six sedimen~ samples were collected from on-site

surface water bodies; the total numbers include one environmental duplicate sample per

sampling medium (Ref. No.3, pp. 13, 27). A Sample Location Map is presented in

Reference No.3, page 13. An analytical data summary is presented in Reference No.

3, page 28. All media samples were analyzed for Target Compound List (TCL) and

Target AnaIyte List (TAL) parameters. For Quality Assurance/Quality Control

(QAlQC) purposes, two eq:uipment rinsate blank samples and one trip blank sample

(VOC analysis only) were also collected. The Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) data

package is included inReference No.3, pp. 215 through 350.

Analytical data of sediment samples indicate the presence of elevated concentrations of

semivolatile organic compounds, such as phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene,

benzo(a)anthi'acene, chrysene, benzo(a)pyrene; PCBs, such as Aroclor 1254 and

Aroclor 1260; and metals, such as mercury, lead, and chromium. Analytical data

indicate the presence of elevated concentrations of the same metals in the Frank Creek

surface water samples.

Passaic River Flood Protection Project - In May 1994, the Baltimore District of the

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) contracted IT Corporation to perform a

Hazardous, Toxic, or Radioactive Waste (HTRW) investigation and hydrogeologic

investigation along the proposed alignment of the Passaic River Basin floodwater

diversion tunnel (Ref. Nos. 8, p. 2; 9, p. 1). As part of the HTRW investigation, IT

Corporation collected soil and groundwater samples for chemical analyses. The

sampling methodology is outlined in Reference No.9, pages 17 through 28. Works haft

2B-K of the project is located near the foot of Bergen Avenue on the Keegan Landfill

site. During the project, a pilot borehole into bedrock and overburden boring were

drilled at this location. Wells were constructed in both boreholes (Ref. No.8, pp. 11,

24, 88, 89). At the close of sampling activities, IT Corporation abandoned the wells by

drilling out obstructions in the pilot borehole and grouting both boreholes (Ref. No.8,

p.60).

From May through August 1994, IT Corporation collected numerous surface soil,

subsurface soil, and groundwater samples. All media samples were analyzed for the

following parameters: VOCs, semivolatile organic compounds, pesticides, PCBs, total

petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) , and metals (including cyanide). Most of the media

samples were also analyzed for the presence of herbicides and the dioxin compound·

2,3,7,8-TCDD (Ref. No.9, pp. 33, 34). Table 1 of this repon provides a summary of

selected soil sampling analytical results. Table 2 of this report presents a summary of

selected groundwater sampling analytical results.

KEEGAN.SIP 12

TIERRA-A-017357
EXISTING ANALYIICAL DATA (Continued)

Table 2: PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT DATA

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATE: JULY 26.1994

E

::>

~

U

Sample No.

GW~Dl 0.11 0.00023 c -

:"',"- - .

1t)'; 8.6 0.42 0.027 33.9

,,,.,-

GW-PDI 0.028 46.2 0.024 31 34 5,1

l1i-0726 (YOM ONLY) NA

All sample IIlID1bers are prec:eded by "28K-."

- • Not derecled.

NA - Not analyzed for paniculllr conl3IllinanL

Ref. No. 10. Attachment F.

"r'~~.

~/:~

'-'100 j-;'

NA NA NA NA NA

A complete list of groundwater sampling analytical results is located in Reference No.9, pp. 44

through 59. Groundwater and Soil Sample Location Maps are presented in Reference Number 8,

pp. 56 and 57.

Suiface Soil Sampling - Analytical data of surface soil samples indicate the presence of elevated

concentrations of inorganic analytes, such as aluminum [16,800 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg»).

barium (23,200 mg/kg), chromium (l,270 mg/kg), iron (202,000 mg/kg), lead (13,000 mg/kg),

and mercury (3.8 mg/kg) (Ref. No. 10, pp. 1, 2, Att. D, pp. 57 through 64, AtL E. pp. 30

through 33). PCBs were also detected in on-site soils at total Arodor concentrations ranging from

non-detected to 120,000 micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg) (Ref. No. 10, Art. D, pp. 41 through

48, An. E, pp. 22 through 25).

KEEGAN. SIP 14

TIERRA-A-017358
DeN STAR, __-F-Ol093

Table 1: PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT DATA

SOIL SAMPLING DATES: 05119/94 THROUGH 08/12/94

S-HA4' I S-MA" $-HAii5,180 I"'~43;

6,800

0""" ~,~

S_HA8° S-HA9° S-HA10" S-HAll" ' S-HAI2"

5.2110 9.220 13,900

179

1,890. 1,740 2,700

406

2,740 23,200

295 101 450

8,000 , 53,800 43,300 77,100 60,200 35,100 48,600

3,300

262

57,1100

1,370 I 242

1,090 1.1150 13,000 7,700 7,240 9,400 4,260 564

7,600

- " I 0.31

1,500

3.e 3.2

15,000

I 4,700

3.5

1110

i.4

I

2,000

100

2,100

5.000 I 1.500 500

4,200

13,000 430

4,000

3,700

8,100

4,200

3,600 i

5,400 I

I

860

4,100

8,200

640

I

I~:;~:~::::: ,,'=2= 1=21= b=' = 1=21: I::~~I 1,;00 8=1 : IT,;:" +1-~-t-----+---t----t-=-'::":;"="-+---il---1f--l--1

Pyrene - - - - 7,1100 1,700 - 8,600

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I,richioroelhene ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - Ir--- -tl----!-I---,t-,I---i--.,.......~_=+_~~t_-__T--+--_if_--+..-___l.---:.~

I~~·~~~ i - 1 - ~ - ~ - 1~~2,~~~0~il-~4~~~~1~3~~~00~-1~4~S~~=~~==+---b--+---~--~~--~---~--~~~~~

AId,,!,! i - I ~ I - I - I 4~ I - 1 - I - k:'::-~~~l .. ~ - ,I - t - 1~...:;;20~.1_-_!-1_-_t-1.....,..._- -t---t-~-+--t---f-~-+---+--==---i---l--I E:: ~ :: ~+-----t---"-""-'-'-t~-t--="''"'---f-=-~~I--'~i-~~---'-''-':'-''!!

I~ 1 - 1 .. 1 - t - 13~1 - ~~~~~_~~~~~~~

I -

2.500

4,400

2,000 :1

4,800 I

3,700

120,000

77

1.400

-I

190 -

1,400 73,000

3,700 9,400 2,000

All sample numbers are preceded by -28K-:

J - Estimated value.

B - Detected in blank sample.

- - Not detecled.

Ref Nos B, p. 28; 10, Ails. A through E.

480 6,300 27,000

50,000

20

210

t40 230

Sample Designations:

o. Sample Nos. S·HA1lhrough S·HA13 are surficial soil samples Ie g., collecled from II deplh less Ihan 2 feel.

"P8"· Sample collected from the overburden portion 01 a pilot borehole In bedrock: the linal number Indlcales sample depth.

"OB- - Sample collected Irom overburden borehole; Ihe final number indicates sample depth.

13

KEEGAN.SIP TIERRA-A-017359
DeN: START·02·F-Ol093

EXISTL'lG ANALYTICAL DATA (Continued)

Other organic compound groups detected in on-site surface soils include VOCs; semivolatile

organic compounds, including phthalates and PAHs; and pesticides, such as 4,4'-DDD, 4,4'-

DDE, and 4,4'-DDT (see Table 2). Analytical data of four surface soil samples indicated the

presence of the dioxin compound 2,3,7,8-TCDD; contaminant concentration ranged from 0.34

to 5.5 ug/kg (Ref. No.9, p. 34). TPH surface soil sample concentrations ranged from 42

mg/kg to 24,000 mg/kg (Ref. No. 10, An. D, pp. 49 through 56, An. E, pp. 26 through 29).

Total cyanide concentrations in surface soil samples ranged from non-detected to 7.8 mg/kg

(Ref. No. 10, An. D, pp. 65 through 74, An. E, pp. 34 through 37).

Subsurface Soil Sampling - Analytical data of subsurface soil samples indicated the presence of

elevated concentrations of inorganic analytes such as aluminum (12,000 mg/kg), barium (711

mg/kg), chromium (211 mg/kg), iron (23,000 mg/kg), and mercury (0.65 mg/kg) (Ref. No.

10, An. B, p. 2, An. C, p. 8). Analytical data of Sample No. 2BK-OBI-04, collected at a

depth of 4 feet, indicated the presence of organic compounds similar to those detected in

surface soil samples (i.e., PAHs, PCBs, and pesticides) (Ref. No. 10, An. C, pp. 9 through

13).

Groundwater Sampling - Analytical data of a groundwater sample collected from the 51O-foot

pilot boring indicated the presence of elevated concentrations of VOCs (l,2-dichloroethene,

trichloroethene, and tetrachloroethene) and metals (iron and zinc). Analytical data of the

overburden groundwater sample indicated the presence of elevated concentrations of lead (Ref.

No.9, p. 37).

SITE INSPECTION PRIORITIZATION SAMPLING RESULTS

On July 30-31, 1997, Region II START conducted a sampling event at the site as pan of SIP

activities. During the SIP, 13 sediment samples, three surface water samples, and four soil

samples were collected. In addition, 2 rinsate blanks and 1 trip blank were collected for

Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) purposes (Ref. No. 25, pp. 1 through 5). Figure

3 provides a Sample Location Map. All samples, except for the trip blank sample, were

analyzed under the U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) for full Target Compound

List (TCL) and Target Analyte List (TAL) parameters, excluding cyanide; the trip blank

sample was analyzed through the CLPfor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) only.

Environmental duplicate and matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) samples were

collected for QA/QC purposes. One environmental duplicate was collected per sampling

medium (Sample Nos. SWOllSW05 and SDOl/SD05). Additional sample volumes were

collected at the Sample No. SW02/SD02 location and submined to the laboratories for

MS/MSD analyses (Ref. No. 25, p. 4).

Tables 3 and 4 present analytical data summaries for the sampling event. Reference No. 25

includes the Sampling Trip Repon, as well as the eLP TCL/TAL analytical data packages.

Analytical data of soil and sediment samples indicate the presence of elevated concentrations of

phthalates, pesticides, and metals.

KEEGAN. SIP 15

TIERRA-A-017360
.-........

.- -

.,,--::.~:i

UX;~

• JfMTE OR SOIL S..uD'LE LOCJ.TION

• SUlU'-'CE ."JTER/SEDlJiENT

SAJIPU LOCJ.TION

~ SZDIJaNT SJ.JlPU LOC.U'ION

~ Roy F'. Weston. Inc.

~ FEDERAL PROGRA.,.S DIVISION

II AS:IClC:Ut.lIl1N_ PIle P_"IHT~ W"'ClD«HT. IIIC.,.

c.c:. .QMICN II IoIAUlD'lRA. p.c.. lIDCIU'lC£ AI'l'UCA-' 1IlC.

ItL SofIlIIIIIIltA ASlDlJA1Q. NO _ ~A. :lEIMCES, 'lie.

TRUCKI~

BLJS:INE3S

(A?P!O:mu.::c ~

700 0 7CO ~-~ I I I

- 1 inch - 700-

tt..

FIGURE 3 - 8.UO'lB 1.0C.!110N !W'

IDG.lN LlNDl'IU.

DABNT, Nn' lERSXY

JULy al~

us ENVIBOHlaNTAL PJtOTEt.110N 4GXNCY

~ _ ......-aT IIHJ II!PllIaE lUW

----, _.
Table 3: Data Summary for TCl Compounds

Keegan landfill SIP

July 30~31,1997

Sample No.

Diethyl n-Nitrosodi Butylbenzylr-----l . 1 I .1 Endrin I alpha- II gamma- Aroclor~

phthalate phenylamine phthalate 14,4'-DDE Endrin 4,4'-ODO 4,4'-nnT aldehyde Chlordane Chlordane 1260

Ref. No. 25

All concentrations are reported in micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg).

Bold italics indicates that concentration exceeds three times background.

• Samples S012, S013, and BK01 are background samples.

NO = Not detected.

R = Rejected data.

( ) = Method detection limit.

S001

S002

S003

5004

S005

5006

S007

5008

5009

5010

5011

5012*

5013*

LF01

LF02

LF03

BK01*

NO (330) NO (330) NO (330) 16 48 73 93: NO (3.3) NO (1.7) NO (1.7) 530

NO (330) .. NO (330) 700 NO (3.3) NO (3.3) 240 130' NO (3.3) . ·73 72 450

NO (330) NO (330) 580 29 NO (3.3) 26 73' 31 28 24 520

NO (330) NO (330) 2,600 54 NO (3.3) 78 100' R 29 16 600

NO (330) NO (330) NO (330) NO (3.3) NO (3.3) 130 R NO (3.3) NO (1.7) NO (1.7) NO (33)

NO (330) NO (330) NO (330) NO (3.3) NO (3.3) NO (3.3) 9.5 NO (3.3):·22 i 20 110

1,400 NO (330) 7,800 730 R 1,300 780 810 900 870 8,100

NO (330) NO (330) NO (330) NO (3.3) NO (3.3) NO (3.3) NO (3.3) NO (3.3) Np (1.7) . NO (1.7) NO (33)

NO (330) NO (330) 180 NO (3.3) NO (3.3) 81 NO (3.3) ,NO (3.3) NO (1.7) NO (1.7) NO (33)

NO (330) '. NO (330) 2,800 23 Nq (3.3) ... 39 78 R· ... '::··25 ••·26 350

NO (330) NO (330) 1,900 140 R 1,900 530 260 180 170 690

NO (330) NO (330) 230 NO (3.3) NO (3.3) NO (3.3) 48 72 NPo.n···: NO (1.7) .. ·.. 320

NO (330) NO (330) 120 20 NO (3.3) NO (3.3) R NO (3.3) R NO (1.7) 350

NO (330); NO (330) 190 56 120< 42 Np (3.3) NO (3.3) '··:::<:":8.1 ~.1 650

NO (330) NO (330) NO (330) ND (3.3) NO (3.3) NO (3.3) R NO (3.3) NO (1.7) NO (1.7) NO (33)

1.600 ······1,200 ..... 5,300 180 ...·300 R::> . ......: 600····93 ::?';;::::-190 R1,800

NO (330) NO (330) NO (330)· NO (3.3) NOl3.3) NO (3.3) 61i NO (3.3) No·d >1) . NO (1.7) 810

17

TIERRA-A-017362
I

",

#" ::..

i~ '.. "..*"

Table 4: Data Summary for TAL Analytes

Keegan Landfill SIP

July 30-31, 1997

Sam Ie No. Antimon Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Co er Lead Nickel Vanadium

S001 3.8 27.9 5.3 103 447 1,130 10.8 50.2 74.2

S()q~.) ....,.;: ···:? ..i:::.,i::~...~· :?)':..::::,:::11.·l~.•::.:,..•.:-,:::?:. ~;~ :';(::::) ... :':1~$·.::::·::::::::::l::::::::::}:~tf) ·:::::·::::::::\d:i:+:~I~:::.::::[:::;::::::::::::n::::::: #~ ?':F::,):.h).$~.;~

S003 NO (12) 2.6 1.3 19.8 R 164 1.1 16 20.6

Spo4:::i::·=:. ...·.:::(::(:::.=::::::tt~~. ·::'::::,[:-'::':::::it1~~.·,):_r.::.'.:n:[j~;~.:;:::::[.':::;:F::::·:~~~. :·?i::f:::~::i·:i::::.~~~[:::::::::;::[:::::::~I~tpO::::::f:::);:::':::::,:::::1.~" ':,::::n:::,i:::::a~;~

S005 2.8 18.9 4.3 61.7 302 844 7.5 35.3 51.3

S[)()~?n.:::::): NQ[(12):. j:=-:':.::·:;[[:;:.:::-.:::::r:. 4.:~ :;:::;:=:::.,:::::::::',1.9.8 R::':::'::i:j·:;::{:)·.,(:::: :.::::[·::::::ii):::[:[ij2.? .:-.::::::.:,.::t.'::.:::q;~:::::::i:i:::;::::n:1·?; 91:.':: n.: ....:::::1~I

S007 23.2 93 441 1,560 2,250 7.1 468

S008'::::': ..•N[)(12)'·'>::: ..·.,<:::: 49.2 R:·.,:·:(:i L (;::',L·j:y:t215 ..... L·g.62 ··::::':.}:';::.'.21 ••7

S009 15.9 143 R 518 0.69 43.9

S010 6.6 54.9 319 10256;2

S011 4.7 281 1,330 5 71.1

S012'\ Np (12) 35.1 R),:::i,:::282 0.75 24.6

5013* NO (12) 44.2 390 754 4 299

lF01 57 ':::. :177 )::'.:.::L:463 2.1 27.3

lF02 26.9 4,870 91.4 0.15 13.6

lF03 118 443 :.;1;200 3.7 82.3

BK01* 34.2 154 522 1.1 24

Ref. No. 25.

All concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).

Bold italics indicates that concentration exceeds three times background.

* Samples 5D12, S013, and BK01 are background samples.

NO = Not detected.

R = Rejected data,

( ) = Contract Required Detection limit.

18

145

<·5'1':7

112

.·49:.3

72.4

..«35,7

59.6

23.1

24.3

106

, 30.4

TIERRA-A-017363
UCN: START-02-F-OI093

Soil Sampling - Three samples (Sample Nos. LF01, LF02, and LF03) were collected from

areas of the landfill in order to assist in characterizing the site waste source. One

background sample (Sample No. BK01) was collected from an area located southeast of the

site in order to assist in determining regional background hazardous substance

concentrations. Analytical results of landfill samples indicated the presence of the following

substances at concentrations significantly above background: diethyl phthalate, butylbenzyl

phthalate, D+nitrosodiphenylamine, 4,4'+DDE, 4,4'-000, 4,4'-DOT, endrin, endrin

aUfehyde, chlordane, antimony, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury, nickel, and

vanadium. Aroclor-1260 was detected in soil samples LF01 and LF03 at concentrations of

650 ug/kg and 1,800 ug/kg, respectively. However, Aroclor-1260 was also detected in the

background soil sample, Sample BK01, at a concentration of 810 ug/kg (Ref. No. 25, pp.

14 through 16, 18 through 23, 26 through 28, and 337 through 339).

Sediment Sampling - START collected a total of 13 sediment samples, including two

background samples (Sample Nos. SD12 and SOB), from the site and its vicinity. Two

samples were collected from areas located north and southeast of the site in order to assist in

determining regional background hazardous substance concentrations. Analytical data of

Samples SOO1 through SO11 represent TCL/T AL parameter concentrations within site

wetlands and adjacent wetlands. Samples SDOl/S005 and SD02 were collected from Frank

Creek, a south-flowing water body that originates on site. Samples SOlO and SDl1 were

collected from associated wetland areas. Analytical data of the Frank Creek sediment

samples indicate the presence of the following substances at concentrations significantly

above background: butylbenzyl phthalate, 4,4'-DDE, 4,4'-00D, 4,4'-00T, endrin, endrin

aldehyde, chlordane, arsenic, and chromium. Samples SD03, SD04, and SD06 through

S009 were collected from wetland areas along the eastern portion of the site. Analytical

data of these samples indicate the presence of the following substances at concentrations

significantly above background: diethyl phthalate, butylbenzyl phthalate, 4,4'-DDE, 4,4'-

DDD, 4,4'-ODT, endrin aldehyde, chlordane, antimony, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and

copper. Aroclor-1260 was detected in Samples SD03, SD04, SD06, and S007; the

concentrations ranged from 110 to 8,100 ug/kg. However, Aroclor-1260 was also detected

in background sediment samples S012 and SOB at concentrations of 320ug/kg and 350

ug/kg, respectively (Ref. No. 25, pp. 14 through 16, 18 through 23, 26 through 28, and

337 through 339).

Surface Water Sampling - START collected three surface water samples, including one

environmental duplicate sample (Sample No. SW05), from Frank Creek. Organic analytical

data of these samples did not indicate the presence of elevated levels of TCL compounds.

Inorganic analytical data indicate lead concentrations ranging from 1,020 to 1,590 ug/L

(Ref. No. 25, pp. 17, 24, 25, 29, and 336).

KEEGAN.SIP 19

TIERRA-A-017364
DeN: START-01-F·OI093

PART IV. HAZARD ASSESSMENT

GROUNDWATER ROUTE

1. Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the groundwater as follows:

observed release, suspected release, or none. Identify contaminants detected or

suspected and provide a rationale for attributing them to the site. For observed

release, defme the supporting analytical evidence and relationship to background .

."

A release of contaminants is suspected due to the presence of on-site soil contamination

and the existence of a shallow water table. From the mid-1960s to 1974, the property

was utilized as a municipal sanitary landfill. Keegan/MSLA leased the propeny from the

Town of Kearny. Unauthorized dumping is also reported to have occurred at the site.

Wastes deposited on site included cardboard, construction, and household waste;

landscaping debris; abandoned tires, appliances, automobiles; and drummedJuncontained

plating wastes (chromate and bichromate slurry), pigment wastes, and organic wastes.

As part of.the Passaic River Flood Protection Project, IT Corporation drilled two on-site

wells, including one 51O-foot pilot boring well (Well No. 2BK-PBOl) and one 22-foot

overburden monitoring well (Well No. 2BK-OBOl). The wells are located at Workshaft

2BK. at the foot of Bergen Avenue. Groundwater was encountered at 14 feet below

,,~ ground surface. In July 1994, one groundwater sample was collected from each well.

Results of on-site groundwater sampling suggest that a release to groundwater has

occurred; however, the data do not meet the observed release criteria because

background samples were not collected. Analytical data of overburden groundwater

samples indicate the presence of inorganic analytes, including aluminum, barium,

chromium, iron, lead, and mercury. The pilot borehole groundwater sample contained

the following chlorinated solvents: 1.2-dichloroethene (31 ug/L) , trichloroethene (34

uglL), and tetrachloroethene (5.1 ug/L). The sample also contained aluminum. barium,

iron, lead, and zinc. In addition, analytical data of surface soil and subsurface soil

samples indicate the presence of similar analytes. Numerous contaminants, such as

PCBs, phthalates, PAHs, pesticides, petroleum hydrocarbons, and dioxin, have been

detected in surface soil samples. Surface soil sample 2BK-S-HA13 contained

trichloroethene (7.7 ug/kg); VOCs were not detected in all other soil samples. Similarly,

analytical data of soil and sediment samples collected in July 1997 by Region II START

indicate the presence of phthalates, pesticides, and inorganic analytes at concentrations

significantly above background.

Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 3, 12, 53, 56, 57; 9, pp. 34, 37, 44 through 58; 10, pp. 2, 3; 25, pp.

14 through 16, 18 through 23. 26 through 28, 337 through 339.

KEEGAN. SIP 20

TIERRA-A-017365
DeN: srART-02.-F-oI093

2. Describe the aquifer of concern; include information such as depth, thickness,

geologic composition, areas of karst terrain, permeability, overlying strata,

confIDing layers, interconnections, discontinuities, depth to water table,

groundwater flow direction.

The Keegan site is located within the Hackensack Meadowlands in the Piedmont

physiographic province of New Jersey. The meadowlands area was once glacial Lake

Hackensack. Groundwater is not known to be used for drinking water purposes in the

vicinity of the site. Therefore, there is no true aquifer of concern. For the purposes of

this report, the aquifer of concern is considered to be the underlying Passaic Formation

of the Brunswick Group (Newark Supergroup). The formation consists of soft, reddish

shale; red sandstone and siltstone; mudstone; and conglomerate. The strata are generally

tilted northwestward, with the ridges tending northeastward. In the site area, the total

thickness of these late Triassic Age rocks is estimated to be 6,000 to 7,000 feet. The

primary water-bearing zone occurs from less than 200 feet to 600 feet below ground

surface. Groundwater movement and storage occurs primarily due to extensive fracturing

of its component rocks. Though cracks intersect so as to allow omni-directional

movement, water may be inhibited in traveling along certain paths by fracture size and

capacity. Approximately 150 feet of unconsolidated sediment overlie bedrock at the site.

The sediments mainly consist of glacial lake sediments and glacial till, which do not

yield a significant amount of water; these sediments usually act as a semi-confIning

aquiclude.

In 1994, IT Corporation conducted a hydrogeologic investigation at the Keegan site as

part of USACE Passaic River Flood Protection Project activities. One 51O-foot pilot

borehole (No. 2BK-PB01) and one 22-foot overburden borehole were drilled. The

stratigraphy of the 2BK-PBOl borehole was reported as follows: 0' to 6' - refuse and soil

fill material; 6' to 9' - organic soil with fill; 9' to 20.5' - gray, sandy silt and silty sand;

20.5' to 25' - medium to coarse sand and fme gravel; 25' to 50' - brownish-gray silty

sand, sandy silt, and clay; 50' to 100' - gray to reddish-brown varved clay, and silt with

sand seams; 100' to 140' - silty sand; and 140' to 155' - glacial till. Bedrock was

encountered at 155 feet below ground surface. Groundwater flow in the overburden is

believed to be south-southwestward toward the Passaic River. Groundwater occurs at

water table conditions at 14 feet below grade.

Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 39, 106, 132 through 135, 356 through 358, 361; 8, pp. 19, 28, 53, 58,

61 through 87.

KEEGAN.SIP 21

TIERRA-A-017366
DeN: START·02·F-DI093

3. What is the depth from the lowest point of waste disposal/storage to the highest

seasonal level of the saturated zone of the aquifer of concern?

The actual lowest point of waste disposal is unknown. Analytical data of surface soil and

- sediment samples collected by Region II START indicate the presence of phthalates,

pesticides, and inorganic analytes at concentrations significantly above background. The

highest possible seasonal level of the saturated zone of the aquifer of concern is the bedrock

surface, which is encountered 155 feet below ground surface at the site. Therefore, the

depth from the lowest point of waste disposal to the highest seasonal level of the saturated

zone of the aquifer of concern is estimated to be 155 feet.

Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 28, 53; 10, An. C, pp. 8 through 13; 25, pp. 14 through 16, 18 through

23, 26 through 28, 337 through 339.

4. What is the permeability value of the least permeable continuous intervening stratum

between the ground surface and the top of the aquifer of concern?

The varved clay and silt with sand seams encountered between 50 and 100 feet below grade

at the site is the least permeable continuous intervening stratum. The permeabiliry

associated with this material (silty clay) is 1O~ centimeters per second (em/s).

Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 27, 28, 57, 61 through 67; 13, p. 4.

M''''~"

"

.Ji

··...2;;

5. What is the net precipitation at the site (inches)?

The net precipitation in the vicinity of the site is between 15 and 30 inches.

Ref. No. 13, pp. 2, 3.

6. What is the distance to and depth of the nearest well that is currently used for drinking

purposes?

Groundwater is not used for drinking purposes within 4 miles of the site.

Ref. Nos. 4; 8, p. 23; 11; 12.

KEEGAN. SIP 22

TIERRA-A-017367
DeN: START -Q2-F-Ql093

7. If a release to groundwater is observed or suspected, detennine the number of people

that obtain drinking water from wells 'that are documented or suspected to be actually

contaminated by hazardous substance(s) attributed to an observed release from the site.

Groundwater is not utilized for drinking water purposes within 4 miles of the site.- Due to

the absence of drinking water wells in the site vicinity, no wells are suspected to be within a

contamination boundary of a potential release.

Ref. Nos. 4; 8, pp. 23, 52; 11; 12.

8. Identify the population served by wells located within 4 miles of the site that draw from

the aquifer of concern.

Distance

0- IA mile

> ~ - lh mile

> lh - 1 mile

> 1 - 2 miles

>2 - 3 miles

> 3 - 4 miles

Population

o

o

o

a

o

a

Ref. Nos. 4; 8, pp. 23, 52; 11; 12.

State whether groundwater is blended with surface water I groundwater, or both before

distribution.

Not applicable.

Ref. Nos. 4; 8, pp. 23, 52; 11; 12.

Is a designated wellhead protection area within 4 miles of the site?

The site is not located within a designated wellhead protection area, as groundwater is not

utilized for drinking water purposes within 4 miles of the site.

Ref. Nos. 4; 8, pp. 23, 52; 11; 12.

Does a waste source overlie a designated or proposed wellhead protection area? If a

release to groundwater is observed or suspected, does a designated or proposed

wellhead protection area lie within the contaminant boundary of the release?

Not applicable.

Ref. Nos. 4; 8. pp. 23, 52; 11; 12.

KEEG~".SIP 23

TIERRA-A-017368
OCr-.': ST ART·02·F·OI093

9. Identify one of the following resource uses of groundwater 'within 4 miles of the

site (i.e., commercial livestock watering, ingredient in commercial food preparation~

supply for commercial aquaculture, supply for major, or designated water recreation

area, excluding drinking water use, irrigation (5-acre minimum) of commercial food or

commercial forage crops, unusable).

Groundwater is not known to be utilized for the above-mentioned resources. No drinking

water wells are located within 4 miles of the site; however, the potential exists for

underlying groundwater to be used for drinking water purposes. Regionally, the chemical

quality of bedrock groundwater is considered to be undesirable for potable supply without

proper treatment. Groundwater within 4 miles of the site is utilized for industrial,

commercial, and small-scale irrigation (lawn-watering) purposes.

Ref. Nos. 4; 8, pp. 22, 23, 46 through 52; 11; 12.

SURFACE WATER ROUTE

10. Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to surface water as follows:

observed release, suspected release, or none. Identify contaminants detected or

suspected and provide a rationale for attributing them to the site. For observed

release, derme the supporting analytical evidence and relationship to background.

"

There' are observed releases of contaminants associated with the site to both watersheds of

the surface water pathway. From the mid-1960s to 1974, the property was utilized as a

municipal sanitary landfill. Keegan/MSLA leased the property from the Town of Kearny.

Unauthorized dumping is also reponed to have occurred at the site. Wastes deposited on

site include cardboard, construction, and household waste; landscaping debris; abandoned

tires, appliances, automobiles; and drummed/uncomained plating wastes (chromate and

bichromate slurry), pigment wastes, and organic wastes. Two probable points of entry to

surface water exist on site: a creek that originates on site (Frank Creek), and a tidal openwater wetland. Frank Creek flows south and eventually discharges to the Passaic River,

located Jh mile south of the site's Harrison Avenue entrance. The tidal wetland area,

located along the eastern border of the site, is pan of the Hackensack River drainage basin.

Although there are observed releases to both watersheds, the Hackensack River watershed is

evaluated fully in this report due to analytical data supponing actual contamination of a

sensitive environment.

On July 30-31, 1997, Region II START collected 13 sediment samples, four soil samples,

and three surface water samples. The samples were analyzed through the U.S. EPA CLP

for TCUT AL parameters. All of the surface water samples were collected from Frank

Creek. The sediment samples were collected from locations along Frank Creek and

contiguous wetlands, the eastern open-water wetland area, and two background locations.

Analytical data of sediment samples collected from Frank Creek and its associated wetlands

KEEGAN.SIP 24

TIERRA-A-017369
DeN: START-02·F.(lI093

indicate the presence of phthalates, pesticides, arsenic, and chromium at concentrations

significantly above background. Analytical data of sediment samples collected from the

eastern open-water wetland area indicate the presence of phthalates, pesticides, antimony,

arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and copper at concentrations significantly above background.

Concentrations of PCBs were detected at various locations throughout the site; however,

PCBs were also detected at similar levels in background samples.

On April 25, 1989, Region II FIT conducted a SI at the Keegan site and collected seven

surface water samples and six sediment samples from on-site surface water bodies. All

media samples were analyzed for TCL/TAL parameters through the U.S. EPA CLP.

Analytical data of sediment samples indicate the presence of elevated concentrations of

semivolatile PAH compounds, such as phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene,

benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene, benzo(a)pyrene; PCBs, such as Arodor 1254 and ArocIor

1260; and metals, such as mercury, lead, and chromium. Analytical data indicate the

presence of elevated concentrations of the same metals in the Frank Creek surface water

samples. Analytical data of Sample No. Sed-I, a sediment sample collected from the openwater wetland perimeter, indicated the presence of PCBs, mercury, and lead. An "oily

sheen" was observed at surface water/sediment Sample Location No. SW-5. In 1994,

similar contaminants were detected during on-site surface soil sampling conducted by IT

Corporation.

Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 12, 13, 27, 28, 38, 41, 45, 78, 199, 383; 7; 10, p. 2; 14; 24; 25, pp. 14

through 16, 18 through 23, 26 through 28, 337 through 339.

11. Identify the nearest downslope surface water. If possible, include a description of

possible surface drainage patterns from the site.

Two downslope surface water bodies are located on site. Frank Creek originates on site and

flows south off site before discharging to the Passaic River; the river is located 112 -mile

south of the fonner Harrison Avenue entrance. The estuarine open-water wetland is

situated along the eastern border of the site. The open-water wetland area drains

southeastward to the Hackensack River. The Passaic and Hackensack Rivers both discharge

to Newark Bay.

Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 3, 12; 14; 24, p. 3.

12. What is the distance in feet to the nearest downslope surface water? Measure the

distance along a course that runoff can be expected to follow.

Frank Creek originates on site. The open-water wetland is immediately adjacent to the

eastern border of the site.

Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 3, 12; 14.

KEEGA.'i.SIP 25

TIERRA-A-017370
DeN: START.Q2·F-DI093

13. Identify all surface water body types within 15 downstream miles.

Name

• Open-water

Wetland

Hackensack River

Watershed

Frank Creek

Passaic River

Hackensack River·

NewarkBai

Arthur Kill •

Kill Van KuIt

Upper NY Bay·

Hudson River·

The Narrows·

Lower NY Bay·

Water Body Type Flow (efs) Saline/Fresh/Brackish

Tidal River N/A Brackish

Tidal River

Tidal River

Tidal River

Coastal Tidal

Coastal Tidal

Coastal Tidal

Coastal Tidal

Tidal River

Coastal Tidal

Coastal Tidal

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Brackish

Brackish

Brackish

Saline

Saline

Saline

Saline

Brackish·

Saline

Saline

• Surface water body evaluated in Hazard Ranking System (HRS) PREscore for the site.

Ref. Nos. 3, p. 90; 13, p. 6; 14 through 17.

14. Determine the 2-yr., 24-hr. rainfall (inches) for the site.

The 2-year, 24-hour rainfall in the area of the site is approximately 3.3 inches.

Ref. No. 18.

15. Determine size of the drainage area (acres) for sources at the site.

Two drainage areas exist on the 230-acre property. It is estimated that the Frank Creek

area, belonging to the Passaic River basin, drains approximately 60 percent, or 138 acres,

of the site. Consequently it is estimated that the open-water wetland area, belonging to the

Hackensack River basin, drains approximately 40 percent, or 92 acres, of the site.

Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 3, 12, 112; 14.

KEEGAN.SIP 26

TIERRA-A-017371
DeN: START-02-F-Ql093

16. Describe the predominant soil group in the drainage area.

Overburden soils in the drainage area are composed primarily of glacial lake sediment

deposits, refuse, and fill. Glacial lake sediments typically include sand, gravel, silt, clay,

peat, and root mat. Due to the presence of clays, sandy clays, silty clays, and organic soils,

it is estimated that frne-textured soils with very low infiltration rates are the predominant

soil group in the area of the site.

Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 356, 357; 8, p. 28; 13, p. 5.

17. Determine the type of floodplain within which the site is located.

The Keegan site is located within a IDO-year flood area.

Ref. No. 19.

18. Identify drinking water intakes in surface waters within 15 miles downstream of the

point of surface water entry. For each intake identify: the name of the surface water

body in which the intake is located, the distance in miles from the point of surface

water entry, population served, and stream flow at the intake location.

Intake

None

Distance Population Served Flow (cfs)

N/A N/A N/A

Ref. Nos. 4; 8, p. 52; 11; 12.

19. Identify fisheries that exist within 15 miles downstream of the point of surface water

entry. For each fishery specify the following information:

Fishery Name

Open-water

Wetland

Hackensack River

Newark Bay

Arthur Kill

Kill Van Kull

Upper NY Bay

Hudson River

The Narrows

Lower NY Bay

KEEGA.'.'.SIP

Water BodY Type Flow (cfs) Saline/Fresh/Brackish

Tidal River N/A Brackish

Tidal River

Coastal Tidal

Coastal Tidal

Coastal Tidal

Coastal Tidal

Tidal River

Coastal Tidal

Coastal Tidal

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Brackish

Saline

Saline

Saline

Saline

Brackish

Saline

Saline

27

TIERRA-A-017372
DeN: START-02·F-DI093

During July 1997 Region II START sampling activities, no one was observed fishing.

However, START personnel noted the presence of a boat launch area, as well as discarded

fishing supplies, along the eastern wetland shore.

There is a statewide ban on the sale of all striped bass taken from New Jersey waters. A

ban also exists on the sale and consumption of all fish and shellfish taken from the lower

portion of the Passaic River.

Certain restrictions due to known contamination exist on the above-mentioned fisheries. In

the Newark Bay Complex, which includes Newark Bay, the lower Hackensack River,

Arthur Kill, Kill Van Kull, and tidal portions of its tributaries, there is a ban on the

consumption of striped bass and blue crab, as well as a health advisory regarding the

consumption of American eel, bluefish, white perch, and white catfish. In the Hudson

River and Upper New York Bay, there is a health advisory regarding the consumption of

American eel, striped bass, bluefish, white perch, white catfish, and blue crabs. In the

Raritan Bay Complex, which includes The Narrows and Lower New York Bay, there is a

health advisory regarding the consumption of striped bass, bluefish, white perch, white

catfish, and blue crabs.

Ref. Nos. 13, p. 6; 14 through 17; 20; 24, p. 10.

20. Identify surface water sensitive environments that exist within 15 miles of the point of

surface water entry.

Environment Water Body Tvpe Flow (efs) Wetland Frontage (miles)

Wetlands - Tidal River

Open-water Wetland

(Hackensack River

watershed)

N/A 4

Wetlands - Coastal Tidal

Hackensack River

N/A 10

Wetlands -Newark Coastal Tidal

Bay

N/A 0.1

Wetlands -Arthur Coastal Tidal

Kill

N/A 2

Wetlands - Upper Coastal Tidal

NY Bay

N/A 1

Wetlands - Lower· Coastal Tidal

NY Bay

N/A 0.1

.j KEEGAN.SIP 28

TIERRA-A-017373
DeN: START-02·F·OI093

Environment Water Bodv Tvpe Flow (cfs) Wetland Frontage (miles)

State-listed Coastal Tidal

endangered species

(Podilymbus podiceps)

N/A N/A

Unique Biotic Coastal Tidal

Community -

Coastal Heron Rookery

at Kearny Marsh

N/A N/A

Federally-listed Coastal Tidal

endangered species

(Falco peregrinus)

N/A N/A

State-listed

endangered species

(Sterna antillarum)

Coastal Tidal N/A N/A

State-listed

endangered species

(Lemna perpusilla)

Coastal Tidal N/A N/A

Unique Biotic Coastal Tidal

Community - Coastal

Heron Rookery at Global Terminal

N/A N/A

Ref. Nos. 13, p. 6; 14 through 17; 21; 22.

21. If a release to surface water is observed or suspected, identify any intakes, fisheries,

and sensitive environments from question Nos. 18-20 that are or may be actually

contaminated by hazardous substance(s) attributed to an observed release from the site.

Intake: N/A

Fishery: Open-water wetland

Sensitive Environment: Wetland; state-listed endangered speCIes habitat; unique biotic

community.

The 1997 Region II START analytical data support actual contamination of 0.2 mile of

wetland frontage based on an observed release of contaminants to the adjacent open-water

KEEGA..'1. SIP 29

TIERRA-A-017374
DeN: START·02-f.Ol093

,.

1

wetland, which is interconnected with .the Kearny Marsh. The NJDEP Natural Heritage

Program (NHP) has indicated that a state-listed endangered species habitat (Pied-billed

grebe) and a unique biotic community (coastal heron rookery at Kearny Marsh) may be

located within the site boundaries.

Ref. Nos. 4; 9, p. 23; 11; 12; 14 through 17; 21; 22; 25, pp. 14 through 16, 18 through 23,

26 through 28, 337 though 339.

22. Identify whether the surface water is used for any of the following purposes, such as:

irrigation (5 acre minimum) of commercial food or commercial forage crops, watering

of commercial livestock, commercial food preparation, recreation, potential drinking

water supply.

The surface waters along the migration route are highly industrialized waterways. However,

surface waters provide navigational channels for both commercial and recreational boating

vessels. In July 1997, Region II START personnel observed a person in a kayak on the

adjacent open-water wetland area.

Ref No. 3,pp. 146, 147; 24, p.4.

SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY

'''~,.. \i

".s:J1 23. Determine the number of people that occupy residences or attend school or day care on

or within 200 feet of observed contamination.

The site is located in a primarily industrial area of the Town of Kearny. No residences are

located on or within 200 feet of observed contamination. There are no schools or day care

centers within 200 feet of the site.

RetNos. 3,pp. 3,12,49,51;4.

24. Determine the number of people that regularly work on or within 200 feet of observed

contamination.

The site is currently inactive; no workers are employed at the site.

Ref. No.7.

KEEGAN.SIP 30

TIERRA-A-017375
DeN: START-02-F-Cl093

25. Identify terrestrial sensitive environments on or within 200 feet of observed

contamination.

Numerous contaminants, such as PCBs, phthalates, PAHs. pesticides, petroleum

hydrocarbons, and dioxin, have been detected in surface soil samples. The NJDEP Natural

Heritage Program (NHP) has indicated that a state-listed endangered species habitat (Piedbilled grebe) and a unique biotic conununity (coastal heron rookery at Kearny Marsh) may

be located within the site boundaries. However. these locations are not considered

terrestrial sensitive environments.

Ref. Nos. 10, p. 2; 22; 25, pp. 14 through 16. 18 tbrough 23, 26 through 28, 337 through

339.

26. Identify whether there are any of the following resource uses, such as commercial

agriculture, silviculture, livestock production or grazing within an observed or

suspected soil contamination.

The site is located in a primarily industrial ponion of the Town of Kearny. None of the

above-mentioned resource uses occur within an area of observed or suspected soil

contamination.

Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 3, 49, 51; 4 .

... ',"

AIR PATffiVAY

27. Describe the likelihood of release of hazardous substances to air as follows: observed

release, suspected release, or none. Identify contaminants detected or suspected and

provide a rationale for attributing them the site. For an observed release, define the

supporting analytical evidence and relationship to backgroWld.

A potential for a release of contaminants associated with the site to air is not currently

suspected. From the mid-1960s to 1974. the property was utilized as a municipal sanitary

landfill. Unauthorized dumping is also reported to have occurred at the site. Wastes

deposited on site include cardboard. construction, and household waste; landscaping debris;

abandoned tires. appliances, and automobiles; and drummedJuncontained plating wastes

(chromate and biclrromate slurry), pigment wastes. and organic wastes. The site is

currently inactive.

Underground landfill fires are known to have occurred on site in December 1981,

December 1984, June/July 1987, and most recently in 1992. On June 29, 1987, air

monitoring results during the underground landfill fire indicated "3 ppm organics at ground

level." In December 1994, while monitoring an underground landfill fire, a Kearny

DPHEP employee noted the presence of a debris pile from wire-burning activities.

KEEGA1'UIP 31

TIERRA-A-017376
DeN: START-Q2-F-QI093

In 1994, IT Corporation conducted on-site field activities as part of the Passaic River Flood

Protection Project. Air monitoring was conducted using a photo ionization detector (PID)

during advancement of a split-spoon sampler at Pilot Borehole 2BK-PBOI. Well boring

logs indicate that a PID reading of "5 ppm above background" was detected from the 32-

foot-depth sample. No readings above background were detected in ambient air during nonintrusive activities. During July 1997 Region II sampling activities, no air monitoring

instrument readings were detected in ambient air. During collection of Sample No. SW-02,

a PID reading of 0.5 units above background was detected from the sample.

Ref. Nos. 3, p. 3, 38, 44, 45, 46, 47, 65, 67, 68, 199, 204 through 213, 383; 7; 8, p. 62;

24.

28. Determine populations that reside within 4 miles of'the site.

Distance Population

On site 0

> 0 - ~ mi. 230

> ~ - lh mi. 1,820

.c:" '} ,.. ~

"

.,~4 > lh - 1 mi. 17,490

> 1 - 2 mi. 63,220

> 2 - 3 mi. 128,230

> 3 - 4 mi. 187,460

Ref. Nos. 7; 23.

,...

KEEGAN. SIP 32

TIERRA-A-017377
ATTACHMENT 1

,'-'-)."

'~-( .

--

TIERRA-A-017378
DeN: START-02-F-oI093

29. Identify sensitive environments, including wetlands and associated wetland acreage,

within 4 miles of the site.

Distance Wetlands Acreage Sensitive Environment

0- 1;4 mi. 225 State-listed endangered speCies

(Podilymbus podiceps); unique

biotic community (coastal heron

rookery).

> 1;4 - Ih mi. 185 None Identified.

> Ih - 1 mi. 320 None Identified.

> 1 - 2 mi. 335 State-listed tIrreatened species

(Passerculus sandwichensis); statelisted endangered species (Lemna

perpusilla).

> 2 - 3 mi. 625 Two state-listed endangered species

(Circus cyaneus and Cisrorhorus

plarensis).

> 3 - 4 mi. 880 Federal-listed endangered species

(Falco peregrinus); three state~listed

endangered species (Phlox pilosa,

Prenanrhes racemosa, and Scirpus

maririmus).

Ref. Nos. 14; 21; 22.

30. If a release to air is observed or suspected, determine the number of people that reside

or are suspected to reside within the area of air contamination from the release.

A release to. air is not observed or suspected; refer to Question No. 27 for a description of

likelihood of a release. .

31. If a release to air is observed or suspected, identify any sensitive environments, listed in

question No. 29, that are or may be located within the area of air contamination from

the release.

A release to air is not observed or suspected; refer to Question No. 27 for a description of

likelihood of a release.

KEEGAN. SIP 33

TIERRA-A-017379
" ,-

J

.'

CCAOOOOS2

,-'

..... - - .... ~ "~I ;..' •• ' -

,._ :...... I - -

. ' '

.;,J- I r - wlJ~(

TIERRA-A-017380
DeN: START-O.:>F-OI093

FINAL

SITE INSPECTION PRIORITIZATION REPORT

KEEGAN LANDFILL

KEARNY, HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

CERCUS ID No.: NJD981490428

Prepared by:

Region II Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team

Roy F. Weston, Inc.

Federal Programs Division

Edison, New Jersey

prepared for:

UNITED STATES E1'."\l ROm-lENT AL PROTECTION AGENCY

EPA Contract No.: 68-W5-0019

TDD No.: 02-96-11-0044

Document Control No.: START-02-F-01093

JUNE 1998

SUBMITTED BY:

Date o~

Date 7;17/~

7 7

KEEGAN. SIP

TIERRA-A-017381
.,.'

, .~

-'

;",,'

...

. .

.. .,.;'~. .' "-c, • ",.

'--";

......".

_,.,.... .1

~ .

.. ..... "

.,

p ......

~ ~

i' •• ' ~"'

~~.: ..~~:

',~'t._ ~

,,·c.·,,;.

.- .~..',: ,',

__i " ~._

• 0 •

REFERENCE NO.6

TIERRA-A-017382
ISUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT NOTES

TO:

y..,....!.".If111 {J, DATE:

o1/z<l!'7

FROM: COPIES;

j.( C-~I.r/'

SUBJECT:

.~J f~.,;fud\ CI..r.h",,,'s

--- -

L~u"Jt

REFERENCE: /'

{A,;.,. I~t tN6~ ... J.m_lt ..(, p, 0,....(_tJ() "

-It 3iJ! 1;>~iLJl .....d la.... ;~"At c~l~ul~\-;''''..$ ",-,"1,,"<:

/

+:/ID 0.> S ~

/ /

0 ./ C~".~ .,

.J

2:5 ~( ,,) !'?/,}"d r -

., ~

"

.H'O"JJ /'1-3 c.... ,150 : 19 .....~H! £.Qu'(j

~

15m L>~.-",.h - 40' '-IS ' 0 0 .• /oJ

-+ 19"

£'.-t: L .i,IvJ.( l.fO°I./S'!'l"N i

t",itd! 4.4 <:"" (I~O') =

I

- 7"1.i.-: c""" '-is''

,/

]5.>\ Lao .'-/-",Jt

-' ':14"'071'30" W

.... '-/5"

Lh L...,,;t~dt lLjo o~' is'' '/II

.I

-'I b I -, -u".r,L... ~ht 12~J..,~r /IO,,";~u~f

J--I < .... J , ".~c< +L.+ +~l >It «: f "'CO~r..bt'U ) 1.1 2Jc -!'( rll I .."d

I c"~,.J,,,....Lr~ "",v VH',,", ~!.'.l.~lv

I

'I I

.-J

i" ".n" ..~ r"!.!.rrU't' doc ,......,.,+~, -

I

""- I

I ..J I

I

i ~

I

I ~

I ~

I ~

I

~ !

~

l

I

i ~

~

~

"""

~?;?4P' ".1t8"j,~

"'7->, \. -

["t. IV"'· ~

TIERRA-A-017383
TELEC01\' NOTE .. ! I SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM !

CO'\TROL so DATE TI1\!£

I

02-96-11-0044 06!l9/97 1500

D1STRIBCTION.

Keegan Landfill file

BETWEEl" Of Hackensack Meadows PHOSE

Chris Duor Development CommISSIon(HJyIDC) (201 ) 460-170n --

.-\!\D

K. Campbell @

DISCllSSJOl"

Mr. Duor. of the HIvIDC Solid Waste Division. prO\lded the following updated site information He

confirmed that the site IS currently involved in litigation The HIvIDC is attemptmg to acquire the following

Lots of Block 205 in the Town of Kearny. Lot Nos 18. 19.24.25.26 (a and b). 27. 28. 29. 30.31. 32. and 33

Lot No 19 contains a large freshwater wetland (referred to as a "wetland lake" in the 1989 51 Report), Lot

~os 25 and 26 (a and b) have buildings on the property. The HIvIDC plans to utilize the property as a

lined constructionldemolruon (C 8:. D) dcbns landfilL They h(lve contmcted CDM to e\'aluate the development

potential of the site~ he antIcipates the findings report by the end of this year After closure of the planned

C 8:. D landfill. the propem may be developed Into a passl\'e park area.

The site locanon is outlIned on an attached copy of the applicable Kearny Tax Maps.

~

.~

"" ..

I ACTION ITEMS

~

"-.

~

"~

"'"

TIERRA-A-017384
SITE LOCATION

;.

o

I.

...';, .

. ....

\

\.....

~

1::..

•

\

\

\

\

\

\

---

.. 1.)1- U:RU 101A1..

.~

TAX MAP

TOWN 'OF KEARNY-

"

"..........TIERRA-A-017385
REFERENCE NO.7

TIERRA-A-017386
SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM TELECO:\ :\OTE

DATE:

06/10/97

TIME

CONTROL NO: I02·95·11-0044

1510

DISTRIBUTION:

V ...... "n T Anclfill file

•

................0-· -- ..---- ----

BETWEEN: OF PHO~t: i

--

Michael Beard Kearny Dept. of Health (201) 997-0600 I

AND e

K. Ca!'!1pbe!!

DISCUSSION I

Mr. Beard and Idiscussed the more recent site history. with regard to local agencies. He confirmed that the I

property stilI belongs to the Town of Keamy: KeeganIMSLA no longer leases the property. The TO\\TIand the

Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission (HlVIDC) are currently in litigation over property control

HlVIDCplans to initially utilize the property as a construction/demolition debris landfill. provided the court

I

..

grants in favor ofHMDC. The landfill would later undergo proper closure. then be developed into a park.. 1\1r.

Beard suggested calling Chris Duar ofHMDC [Tel. No.: (201) 460-1700] for the correct site block and lot I

numbers; he did not feel that the assessors office would have the information as readily available as the HMDC

Mr. Beard is not aware of any permits associated with the site. Three site entrances exist: two from Bergen

Avenue and one from Harrison Avenue. The site remains unfenced: however. all three site entrances currently

are barricaded with concrete roadway dividers. At one point. the on-site access roads were Improved: although

it is uncertain whether improvements were completed. No areas of the landfill were covered (recommended 2

feet of fill) and seeded. Mr. Beard does not believe that the suggested easement across the properties belonging

.-

to Mimi Development was obtained.

Mr. Beard reported that an underground fire occurred approximately five years ago (e.g .. in 1992). Regarding

..

the possibility of current unauthorized dumping. Mr. Beard stated that the blocked access roads prevent vehicles

from entering the site, and therefore help prevent illegal dumping.

ACTION ITEMS:

. Telephone Chris Duor (HMDC) re: block/lot nos. ~

TIERRA-A-017387
TIERRA-A-017388
,.'-,-:-:-, -- ..::..--. ."

.~ .r ,

~' ..-

."

-. ~..>. t' .• ",1, . :~:~~'

.....

" ~','

~~..'.

. ,

'l ,~

0.-:.<' :- t .~~ .•

';'..... .;../~...-..:.

' .,:'f-' ~

'.. ~ ,~, . ~""-.-'o~'.; . .-.~.:

.,",,':..~'~- '.

';"f / .. ,".~"":

·T,..",,,".- .'.,.:.

~- .,.-". '.4.~:

.

J

REFERENCE NO.8

TIERRA-A-017389
m...INTERNF ..TIONAL

~. '. TECHNOLOGY

". .:' CORPORATION

Contract DACW31-94-C-OOn

FebruEry 199::

GrourH:hJu'C}ter~nvestiga~.o.n Final Report

Passaic Pjve~~Fiood Proteqtion Project

P

.....,. ~. lI.R J CiSS~UCl"-'llrv®r :;,;s;sln,."ewersey

Prepared for:

Department o~the Army

u.s. Arm}' Corps of Engineers

Baltimore D!strict

Baltimore, PfaClii,and

Prepared by:

IT Corpo.atl:::m

Edison, New Jersey

-.)' ~ r. I TIERRA-A-017390
Iptroduction

The USACB Baltimore District hired IT Corporation in May__

1994 to perform a hydrogeologic investigation along the alignment

of the proposed floodwater diversion tunnel in the Passaic River

Basin. The diversion tunnel consists of two inlet shafts Pompton

and·Spur Inlets), four construction work shafts (2, 2B, 2C and

3), a 40 foot diameter main tunnel alignment 20.1 miles long, and

a 20 foot diameter spur tunnel 1.2 miles long. The tunnel will

discharge into Newark Bay. The project location is shown on

Figure ES-01. The model areas and tunnel alignment are sho"-"11on

Figure ES-02.

The purpose of the investigation was to estimate the

potential effects of groundwater on tunnel design and

construction and the potential effects of tunnel design and

construction on the regional groundwater regime. IT conducted a

field investigation at several proposed workshaft locations and

completed a groundwater modeling study of five areas along the

alignment to achieve these objectives. Specifically the goals

were to:

.... Determine the geologic and hydrogeologic

characteristics at four work shaft locations 2, 2B, 2C

and 3, and utilize this data to evaluate groundwater

conditions along the length of the tunnel.

• Evaluate potential seepage rates into the tunnel during

and after construction through the use of groundwater

modeling techniques.

•

• Estimate the magnitude of drawdown in local aquifers

and potential impacts to nearby water wells.

• Assess the potential for contaminants to be mobilized

as a result of tunnel installation.

Site Inyestigatipns

IT conducted an intrusive subsurface investigation at the

proposed locations of Workshafts 2B and 2C in Kearny, Workshaft 2

in Little Palls, and Workshaft 3 in Wayne, New Jersey. These

locations were selected by the USACB as representative of major

formations along the tunnel and for the dual purpose of

collecting data at these shaft locations. The activities

included soil and rock core collection and characterization,

borehole geophysics, short-duration permeability tests, and

short- and long-duration pumping tests. The data from the field

investigation and trom previous studies by the USACE and USGS

were used to develop a regional hydrogeologic framework.

Hydraulic testing data from the pumping tests were used to

estimate aquifer parameters for groundwater flow modeling. The

J:DIS/L12li3-ZI_ZJmcuU". .SUIIIIIIlrY E5-1

p.2.

TIERRA-A-017391
modeling study evaluated quantitatively the interconnection of

overburden materials with bedrock aquifers. The groundwater

models were also used to estimate the quantity of groundwater

that may (depending on the final design and construction

technique selected) flow into the tunnel during construction and

during operations. The models evaluate the potential for ----

interference with existing water-supply wells, and mobilization

of existing known groundwater contaminants.

At Workshaft 2 a pilot boring was installed-by the USACB to

a depth of 525 feet, and a pumping well was installed to a depth

of 530 feet by IT. The bedrock encountered at this location was

the Passaic Formation, at a depth of 20 feet below ground level

(bgl). Downhole geophysical logging was performed on both wells.

Straddle packer tests were performed in the pumping well. A

multiport system was installed in the pilot boring after

reviewing the geophysical logs, geological logs, straddle packer

test results, and USACB pressure test results.

Water producing zones were encountered at depths of 30-130

feet bgl, 220-270 feet bgl, and 300-530 feet bgl. Transmissivity

values repr~senting the potential flow rates at these depths were

3,820 gpd/ft, 335 gpd/ft, and 80 gpd/ft, respectively. Hydraulic

conductivity values ranged from 38.2 gpd/ft2 to 0.35 gpd/ft2

•

~ At Workshaft 2B two potential shaft locations were

. A 10 foot dee ilot borin and a 22 foot deep

overburden monitoring well were installed by IT at or s a B-

~ A 510 foot deep pumping well, a 510 foot deep pilot~boring

and a 114 foot deep overburden monitoring well were installed by

IT at Workshaft 2B-F. Additionally, IT deepened a pilot boring

initially installed by USACE (C-23), drilling from 501.5 feet to

a total depth of 653.5 feet. This location was used to obtain

hydrogeologic data during pumping tests. The bedrock encountered

at this location was also the Passaic Formation, at depths of 280

feet and 155 feet bgl at 2B-F and 2B-K, respectively.

Geophysical logs were run in the 2B-F pumping well and pilot

boring, C-23 pilot boring, and 2B-K pilot boring. Multipart

systems were installed in the 2-BF and 2B-K pilot borings after

eight 1-hour straddle packer tests were performed on the pilot

boring at Workshaft 2B-K, and six were performed at Workshaft

2B-F. Six l-hour straddle packer tests were performed on the

pumping test well at Workshaft 2B-F. In addition, one 8-hour and

one 72-hour pumping tests were performed at the pumping well at

Workshaft 2B-F after multiport installations.

A high yielding water producing zone was encountered at a

depth of 338 feet to 388 feet bgl. This 50 foot interval had a

transmissivity of 30,000 gpd/ft and a hydraulic conductivity

value of 600 gpd/ft2

• The remainder of the zones in the bedrock

aquifer were relatively impermeable.

ClIS/L1263-ES_E.x.euUVlIl Suzzmary ES-2

p.3

TIERRA~A~017392
•

to evaluate the seepage rates to the tunnel during construction,

estimate the long-term steady-state seepage rates to the tunnel

after a liner is installed, and predict the amount of groundwater

drawdown that Ddght occur in the geological units as a result of

tunnel seepage during both conditions.

The Packanack Lake model is located near the north end of

the tunnel and was used to simulate groundwater conditions in the

Boonton Shale and Hook Mountain Basalt. The permeabilities of

these rocks are expected to be less than 0.5 foot/day. As a

result, the estimated seepage after 100 days of construction is

only 158 gpm/mi1e. Once a liner was added to the tunnel

simulation, the seepage rate into the tunnel decreased

immediately to 53 gpm/mile. The maximum steady state drawdown in

groundwater levels at the end of construction was about 100 feet

directly adjacent to the tunnel. The drawdown at 1,000 feet

horizontal distance from the tunnel was about 13 feet and about 1

foot at 2000 feet distance.

The Preakness Valley model was located just south of the

Packanack Lake model area and includes shales and siltstones of

the Boonton and Towaco Formations, as well as the Hook Mountain

Basalt. Hydraulic conductivities of fracture zones in this model

ranged up to 3.4 feet/day. As a result, maximum seepage rates

into the tunnel during construction (1056 gpm/mdle) and after

liner installation (121 gpm/mile) are greater than estimated for

the Packanack Lake area. Maximum drawdown at the tunnel could be

as great as 50 feet, but will decrease to less than 20 feet at

about 3000 feet at horizontal distances from the tunnel

alignment.

The Little Falls model is located near the central portion

of the tunnel alignment and was used to simulate groundwater .

conditions in the Peltville Pormation, Orange Mountain Basalt,

and a small portion of the Passaic Formation. This area also

includes the Work Shaft 2 site. There are a number of fracture

zones located in the basalt and the Feltville siltstones, which

may have hydraulic conductivity values as high as 10 feet/day.

Also, there is a bedrock valley filled with sand and gravel

deposits that overlies the tunnel alignment. For these reasons,

seepage into this section of the tunnel could be greater than

anywhere else &1ong the tunnel alignment. A maximum inflow of

1,430 gpm/mile was predicted during construction and ~27 gpm/mile

was predicted to occur after the liner is installed. The maximum

amount of drawdown in the Little Falls model area was predicted

to be 155 feet in unfractured rock directly adjacent to the

tunnel after constructioD. At a distance of 1,000 feet, the

predicted drawdoWD in unfractured rock was substantially lower,

about 10 feet. Predicted drawdowns in the fractured rock

aquifers were about 3 feet, and zero in the overlying sand and

gravel aquifer.

~ The Kearny model area is located toward the south end of the

alignment and contains only rocks of the Passaic Formation. A

EDIS/Ll2&3-J:S_ExaCUUYe s~ ES-4

p."!

TIERRA-A-017393
deep bedrock valley also cuts across this section of the

alignment and is partially filled with san~ and gravel .. M~imurn

predicted seepage rate into the tunnel dur~DS construct1on 1S 754

gpm/mile. After installation of the liner, steady state seepage

into a dry tunnel should be about 96 gpm/mile. If the tunnel is

allowed to flood and operate in a ·wet" condition, seepage into

the tunnel will be negligible (15 gpm/mile). For a lined tunnel

during steady-state "wet" conditions, drawdown in surrounding

rocks will be small or negligible.

The Newark Bay model is located at the far south end of the

tunnel near the tunnel outlet. It includes only rocks of the

Passaic Formation. Maximum seepage into the tunnel during

construction was predicted to be 413 gpm/mile. If the tunnel is

operated as a "wet" tunnel, steady state seepage into the tunnel

and drawdown in the surrounding rocks will be almost zero.

If the southern portion of the tunnel that lies below sea

level is operated as a wet tunnel, then it will need to be pumped

dry occasionally for cleaning and maintenance. In this scenario,

seepage rates into the lined tunnel will be approximately 130 to

180 gpm/mile during the dewatering operation.

Groundwater modeling results for all five model areas have

shown that drawdown of groundwater in shallow overburden aquifers

is not expected along the tunnel alignment as a result of tunnel

construction or operation. Many bedrock wells are located within

5,000 feet of the tunnel alignment along the southern end of the

proposed tunnel. These wells could experience drawdown impacts

ranging from 10 to 50 feet during construction activities. Once

construction is completed, the tunnel will be lined and inflow

will be significantly diminished. Additionally, if the tunnel is

operated in a wet condition (i.e., the tunnel will remain filled

with water to an elevation of 0.0 feet msl), significant long

term drawdown impacts from the tunnel do not exist. The wells

along the alignment would only be impacted for short periods of

time during dewatering and maintenance activities. Therefore,

drawdown would be less than during construction activities.

If a well were to be significantly affected by drawdown, the

cost to hook-up to municipal water supplies is estimated to be

roughly $700 (Passaic Valley Water Commission, personal

communication, 1995). The $700 estimate is considered an average

installation cost for a 2-inch line from curb to building.

Therefore, the $700 estimate ordinarily applies to single family

residences and other small volume water users. Hence, small

capacity water wells that are impacted temporarily by tunnel

construction or maintenance operations could be mitigated

inexpensively by connecting the user to a public water supply.

Distribution lines for public water supplies are common

throughout the southern portion of the tunnel alignment and

virtually the entire nearby population is serviced by purveyor

supplied surface water. In the northern portion of the

EDIS/L1.263-Z:S_J:.xecuti~ SUIIDll%Y ES-5

p.5

TIERRA-A-017394
alignment, there is less urbanization, and consequently, the

density of distribution lines are less. However, most of the

population in the north has convenient access to nearby

distribution lines.

In general, groundwater impacts associated with this pr6Je~t

will be small relative to the groundwater resources of the

region. As a result, long-term water allocation permits are not

required and water diversion permi~ requirem7nts will be ~i~~ed

to short term construction dewater1ng and ma1ntenance act1v1t1es.

Interactigns of Tunnel Cgnstruction and Qperation with HTRW Sitos

In conjunction with the groundwater investigation., IT also

conducted an investigation of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive

waste (HTRW) sites along the tunnel alignment and near other

project features, such as levees and floodwalls. -This

information is contained in a separate report entitled Hazardous,

Toxic and Radioactive Waste Investigation Final Report Passaic

River Flood Protection project; P!?-ssaicRiver Basin, New Jersey

dated January 1995. The investigation included collection and

analysis of soil and groundwater samples at proposed Workshaft

and Tunnel Inlet locations, and evaluation of known HTRW sites in

the vicinity. Various levels of groundwater contamination were

identified at one workshaft location and several known HTRW sites

along the alignment.

Deep groundwater collected from the highly permeable zone at

the Workshaft 2B location was shown to be contaminated' with up to

900 ppb of chlorinated solvents. It is projected that bath the

tunnel and the workshaft will intersect this zone. All other

shaft and inlet locations at which IT collected groundwater

samples showed minor or no contamination.

Shallow groundwater contamination, including separate-phase

product in some cases, has been reported in the glacial

overburden at several known HTRW sites along the tunnel

alignment. The groundwater models indicate that there will be

negligible or no induced drawdown effects in overburden sand and

gravel deposits during tunnel construction and operations.

Therefore, the project is not expected to affect the existing

contamination at these sites, unless the contamination has

already migrated vertically downward into bedrock.

Deep groundwater contamination has been reported at two

known HTRW sites along the alignment. The Contract Packaging

Corporation is located approximately 1,000 feet from the tunnel

alignment near Workshaft 4. The deep contamination at this site

is described as -low ppbft of tetrachloroethylene. This minor

contamination is not expected to impact or be impacted by the

tunnel. However, higher levels of contamination at Printers

Service in Newark could pose a greater problem. This site lies

within 100 feet of the proposed alignment between Workshafts 2B

and 2C. Deep groundwater at the site reportedly contains 2,000

EDIS!L1263-ZS_Ezecutive Summary ES-6

p.l>

TIERRA-A-017395
ppm of methylene chloride. However, this reported contamination

has not been confirmed and may not in fact be present. Because

the most severe induced drawdown effects are expected to occur in

bedrock immediately adjacent to the tunnel alignment, there is a

relatively high potential for seepage of these contaminants into

the tunnel during construction and later during the operations--

phase.

EDIS/L1263-ES_Ezacut1ve Summary ES.7

p-i

TIERRA-A-017396
mDITDJr&TIDII'.A

TlCllKOLOOT

.. COKPOU'lIOIf ~1---------===--------1

..

"-

!i

~

~

r...

"-

Eo

!I-----....,.-- ..... -------"'T'"- ...... ~-~--r__-_t ~I--:=.;,~-+-.:.::.=...~----+--===-_+=...:::_t

~L-__ :...........:.::=.... __ .....:. .....;........I ___..I

i

I!

co

..~-- o

.::::. ..o

...s. >WlS _ ...D...... _ '0/1:1/104

------_.-

i

..

~ f«:Jmo1ogi_ me.

FIGURE E5-01

PROJECT LOCATION MAP

--

529740

-- - -- --

TIERRA-A-017397
" ',-

780.000

7&0.000 •

140.000 •

120,000 .

1oo.0OC .

1110,000 •

1. '00.000

POMPTON PLAINS

......---1.- INL~

~IIIIIIIIII~~::::::~PACKANACK LAKE

~ "OOEl AREA

PREAKNESS VALLEY

~

~~~~~[ MODEL AREA WORK

SHAFT H3

WORK

SHAFT #4

2. , 10.00c

~~

~5

~ ~

"' o'

~ ~

"'-~~L----------- ·-

..L ;..._....;.;,;..;. ......... _..1

·'"·

7000 o 7000 uooo

I

II,

i

KEARNY ~~II~~; .MODEl AREA

.,

NEWARK BAY

MODEL AREA

~~~- KEARNY PorNT

WORK SHAFT #2C

NEWARK BAY

OUTL[T

2. '40.000 2. '&O.ClIO 2.l80.COO

F"IGURE E5-02

MODEL AREAS AND

TUNNEL ALIGNMENT

-'or

[~~ u.s. ARLtY CORPS or ENGINEERS I... .: 8'.l.TltoIORE DlsmlCT

I"EBR\JAAy , 995

--

529740 IA 1881l--,~::--------:~ 5297 40A 188/

TIERRA-A-017398
I . INTRODUCTION

,.'

The Passaic River Flood Protection project, designed to

alleviate flooding of the Passaic and pompton Rivers, consists of

two major elements. These include construction of underground

floodwater diversion tunnels and a system of stream floodw~ls

and levees. The proposed tunnel system consists of a main 20.1-

mile long, 40-foot diameter diversion tunnel CMain Tunnel) along

with a 1.2-mile long, 20-foot diameter spur (Spur Tunnel). The

Main Tunnel will convey flo~d waters from the uPP7r reach.o~ ~he

Pompton River to an outlet ~n Newark Bay located ~n the v1c1n1ty

of Kearny Point. The Spur Tunnel will convey flood waters from

the Passaic River through an inlet located just south of the

confluence of the Passaic and Pompton Rivers to an underground

junction with the Main Tunnel. A series of floodwalls and levees

completes the Passaic River Flood Protection Project design. The

project location is shown on Figure 1-01.

The selected tunnel alignment is approximately 400 feet

below ground level at the workshaft locations and traverses

heavily industrialized portions of northern New Jersey where

numerous instances of soil and groundwater contamination have

been documented. Portions of the project area are heavily

industrialized, presenting the potential for encountering

significant groundwater, surface water, and soil contamination

during project construction. Industrial sites located along the

selected tunnel alignment include sites associated with petroleum

storage and refining, chemical processing, metal plating and

finishing, and landfilling. Groundwater in the vicinity of the

tunnel alignment has been classified by the State of New.Jersey

as Class 2B throughout the project area. Groundwater designated

as Class 2B is characterized as having widespread contamination

and is considered to be unsuitable for public water supply. .

Class 2B groundwater may be used for purposes other than drinking

water supply if these uses do not contribute to present levels of

contamination. Remedia;ion activities have been completed or are

currently underway at several locations along the proposed

project corridor.

The specific environmental concerns in the proposed tunnel

area include (1) reduction of hydraulic head in local aquifer

systems and interference with local water users; (2) seepage of

potentially contaminated groundwater into the tunnel during

construction activities and potential worker exposure; (3)

seepage of potentially contaminated groundwater into the tunnel

during operation, and (4) mobilization of contaminants at

Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste (HTRW) sites near the

tunnel or shatts which may possibly affect the local groundwater

use. A separate report titled Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive

June 8, 1995 Haste Investigation Final Report; Passaic River

Flood Protection Project; Passaic River Basin, New Jersey, dated

Janu~ 1995 addresses the HTRW issues in more detail.

Groundwater inflow into the tunnel and shafts during construction

I-I

f·/D

TIERRA-A-017399
is also an engineering concern. High flow rates would make

working conditions more difficult, and can possibly undermine

rock stability, potentially endangering the construction crew.

The objectives of the groundwater investigation were to

characterize the hydrogeologic environment and to obtain ---

estimated aquifer parameters for groundwater flow modeling. Data

were also used to develop a regional hydrogeologic framework.

Data collected during the groundwater investigation were used

during the modeling study to evaluate the interconnection of the

shallow subsurface with the deep bedrock aquifers, and the

potential for tunnel construction and operation activities to

mobilize contaminants. Other objectives include estimation of

inflow quantities of groundwater into the tunnel and shaft

excavations during and following construction, localized

interference with water supply wells, and dewatering-induced

settlements. .

The groundwater investigation included intrusive

investigations ranging from straddle packer testing in pilot

boreholes to multi-well, multi-zone pumping tests at several

shaft locations. The groundwater investigation was conducted in

conjunction with the HTRW field investigation to minimize the

number of boreholes, samples, and field tests required. The

groundwater investigation included installation of deep 4-inch

diameter 2ilpt borings at Workshafts 2B-Fiore, za-Keegan, and 2C.

Eight-inch diameter pumping test wells were installed at

Workshafts 2B-Fiore, 2C, 3, and 2. Overburden wells were

installed at Workshafts 2B-Piore, 2B-Kees~, 2C, and'3 as well

as at the Pompton Inlet and Spur Inlet.

The current investigation included development of five

groundwater models for areas along the tunnel alignment between

shafts 2C, 2B, 2A, 2, 3, 4, and the outlet shaft at Newark Bay.

The specific groundwater modeling and particle tracking studies

were designed to evaluate the short- and l.ong-term environmental

impacts due to the tunnel construction, operation, and

maintenance.

Pursuant to the project objectives discussed above, the

remainder of this chapter provides a description of several

aspects of the project area. Chapter II discusses the approach

and methods used during the investigation, Chapter III provides

the results of the field investigation, Chapter IV discusses the

groundwater modeling performed for the project and Chapter V

discusses the potential impacts of construction on water users

and known HTRW sites, as well as impacts of these sites on tunnel

construction and operation.

A. Project Location

The Passaic River Flood Protection Program encompasses a

large area in northeastern New Jersey, spanning from Wayne

I-2

f"'1

TIERRA-A-017400
Township at the northern end of the project area to Kearny at the

southern end. Groundwater investigative activities were

conducted at Workshafts 2B-Piore (2B-F), 2B-Keegan .(2B-K), 2C, 3,

and 2 as well as at the Pompton and Spur Tunnel Inlets.

Workshaft 2B-K is located on the s_;_te_9~_th~fo~r Keegan

Landfill at the foot of Bergen Avenue in Kearny, NJ. Workshaft

2B-P is located approximately 1,100 feet from 2A-K, at the A.J.

Piore Disposal Company facility, in Kearny, NJ. Workshaft 2C is

located near Central Avenue in Kearny at a site formerly occupied

by Western Blectric (also known as AT&T Technologies) and now

known as the River Terminal Development Corporation. Workshaft 3

is located on a vacant parcel within the southern portion of

Wayne Township, approximately 1,600 feet from the Wayne-Totowa

border. Workshaft 2 is located on an undeveloped portion of

Montclair State University in Upper Montclair, NJ. The site is

adjacent to a former quarrying operation. The Pompton River

Inlet site is located at the Top Soil Depot facility, adjacent to

the Pompton River on Pompton Plains Cross Road in Wayne Township,

NJ. The Spur Tunnel Inlet is located in a wooded lot

approximately 150 feet east of Pairfield Road in the southwestern

portion of Wayne Township. Figure 1-02 shows locations of sites

where groundwater i~vestigation activities took place.

B. Purpose of the Hydrogeological Investigation

The reciprocal purposes of the hydrogeological investigation

are: 1) to determine whether and to what extent groundwater will

affect tunnel design and construction; and 2) to determine

whether and to wbat extent tunnel design and construction will

affect groundwater.

The objectives stated above were attained through the

characterization of the hydrogeologic environment and the

estimation of aquifer parameters for modeling of groundwater flow

regimes. Data were gathered to define site-specific conditions

at proposed workshaft locations. The site-specific conditions

were used to develop a regional hydrogeologic framework. The

data were used during the modeling study to evaluate the

interconnection of the shallow subsurface with deep bedrock

aquifer(s). Potential inflow quantities of groundwater into the

tunnel and shaft excavations during and after construction were

estimated. The possibilities of interfering with water supply

wells and inducing ground settlements were also evaluated.

C. Regional Environmental Setting

1. Physiography

New Jersey has been divided into four general physiograohic

provinces, which have distinctive rock types, landforms, and~

drainage patterns (New Jersey Geological Survey [NJGS], 1994).

From northwest to southeast, these regions are: Valley and

1-3

p. '"

TIERRA-A-017401
Ridge, Highlands, Piedmont, and Coastal Plain (Figure I-03). The

Passaic River Basin is a watershed of 935 square miles, located

primarily in north central New Jersey, with a ~ll portion ~n

southern New York (Figure I-04). The upper port10n of the r1ver

basin lies in the Highlands, while the majority of the river

basin lies in the Piedmont Province. ----

The Highlands are underlain by granite, gneiss, and small

amounts of marble of Precambrian age. The Precambrian igneous

and metamorphic rocks are interrupted by several elongate

northeast-southwest trending bands of folded Paleozoic

sedimentary rocks. The granites and gneisses are resistant to

erosion and as a result now form a hilly upland dissected by

deep, steep-sided valleys of major streams.

Most of the major tributaries of the Pompton and'Passaic

Rivers originate in the Highlands Province. The Pequannock,

Wanaque, and Ramapo Rivers are the three major streams that form

the Pompton River and their watersheds lie mostly in the

Highlands. The watersheds of the Rockaway and Whippany Rivers

(major tributaries of the Passaic River) also lie in the

Highlands.

The Passaic River Tunnel project is located in the lower

portion of the watershed to the southeast of the Highlands; it

lies entirely in the Piedmont Province. The rocks of the

Piedmont include Triassic and Jurassic interbedded sandstone,

siltstone, shale, conglomerate, basalt, and diabase. The

Piedmont is generally a broad lowland area interrupted by long

northeast-southwest trending ridges which are formed by the

erosion-resistant diabase and basalt formations. In the tunnel

project area, three ridges are prominent and of greatest

interest: First Watchung Mountain, Second Watchung Mountain (or

Preakness Mountain), and Packanack Mountain.

Altitudes in the Highlands range from 1,491 feet above mean

sea level (MSL) on Bearfort Mountain to 200 feet on the Wanaque

River at Pompton Lakes. The maximum local relief is 850 feet

between the crest of Bearfort Mountain and the valley immediately

to the east (Carswell and Rooney, 1976). The Piedmont is more of

a lowland area with elevations typically ranging from 100 to 400

feet. The highest elevation is 885 feet, which is found along

the crest of the Second Watchung Mountain. The lowest altitude

is sea level along the southeastern edge of the Piedmont.

The Pompton and Passaic Rivers and their tributaries flow in

an irregular pattern, sometimes changing direction drastically.

However, overall drainage direction is to the southeast, where

the Passaic River enters Newark Bay (Figure I-04). The Pompton

River has to pass through a gap in Packanack Mountain before

joining the Passaic River. The Passaic River cuts through gaps

in the First and Second Watchung Mountains near Paterson and

1-4

r·l~

TIERRA-A-017402
Little Palls, respectively (Figure I-04). Smaller streams, in

general, parallel the ridges of the Watchung Mountains.

2. Regional Geology

Beginning in early Mesozoic time, the Newark Basin deve2~ped

as one in a series of rift basins along the eastern seaboard of

North America, from Florida to Nova Scotia. Large, elongate

crUstal blocks were dropped downward during the initial stages of

the opening of the Atlantic Ocean. These down-dropped blocks

fonned valleys known as rift basins. Sediment eroded from

adjacent uplands was deposited along rivers and in lakes within

the basins. These sediments became compacted and cemented to

form conglomerate, sandstone, siltstone, and shale. They

commonly have a distinctive reddish-brown color, because

extensive iron oxidation occurred in the subaerial depositional

environment.

Triassic and Jurassic rocks of the Newark Basin (; e •

Piedmont, Figure 1-03) are separated from the rocks of the

Highlands by a series of high-angle normal faults, including the

Ramapo Fault. During the course of crustal extension and

rifting, the rock layers of the Newark Basin have become tilted

northwestward, gently folded, and cut by several major faults.

Volcanic activity was also associated with the rifting, which

resulted in diabase sills being intruded into the sediments and

basaltic lava flows being deposited over the sediments

intermittently during the filling of the basin. The diabase

sills and basalt layers form ridges in the otherwise lowland area

of the Piedmont (Newark Basin) .

Generally, the rocks of Newark Basin strike northeastsouthwest and dip from 5 to 25 degrees to the northwest (Pigure

I-OS). In the southeastern part of the tunnel alignment, the

rocks strike north 30 degrees east and dip from 5 to 15 degrees

to the northwest (Parker, et a1., undated). In the northwestern

part of the tunnel alignment, bedrock units have been folded

along the Hook Mountain syncline. The axis of the syncline

strikes northwest-southeast and plunges to the northwest. The

tunnel corridor lies on the northeast limb of the syncline.

According to Martin (1994), sedimentary rocks near the Pompton

Inlet strike about 28 degrees west of north and dip to the

southwest at angles ranging from 8 to 22 degrees. Along the

majority of the tunnel route (central and southern portion), the

tunnel alignment is parallel to the dip direction. As a result

of the Hook Mountain syncline, the northern portion of the tunnel

will travel parallel to strike of the bedrock units.

The rock formations of the Newark Basin are shown in

Figure 1-06. The tunnel traverses most of the Basin, so it will

intersect nearly all of the formations and rock types found in

the Basin (Pigure 1-07). Specifically, the tunnel will pass

through the Brunswick Group, from the youngest Boonton Forrr~~ion

TIERRA-A-017403
in the northwest to the oldest Passaic Formation in the southeast

(Figures I-OS through I-07) .

Passaic Formation: Nearly two-thirds of the tunneling

activities will be through the Passaic Formation. The Passaic

Formation crops out within the Lower Valley area of the Passai~

River, along the southeastern section of the tunnel (Figure

I-04). It consists of a thick sequence of clastic sediments

nearly 9,000 feet thick (Hoffman, 1989a; Hoffman and Quinlan,

~994). The Passaic Formation has been subdivided by Parker, et

al., (undated) into informal mappable lithofacies units (Figure

I-07) on the basis of stratigraphic position, areal distribution,

color, and grain size. These lithofacies consist of mudstones,

siltstones, sandstones, and conglomerates in varying percentages.

Generally, the units are finer-grained towards the base of the

Passaic Formation and coarser towards the top. Figure 1-08 shows

stratigraphic and lithologic relationships of the Passaic

Formation in the vicinity of the tunnel alignment. The geology

in Figure 1-08 was taken from Parker (1993).

Unit 1 in Figure 1-07 includes siltstone, mudstone, and

sandst~ne facies. It consists primarily of thick, fining-upwards

sequen=es·of intercalated massive siltstone and mudstone. The

massive mudstone beds contain some relatively thin beds of crossbedded sandstone. As a whole, the unit fines upwards and becomes

sandier in the middle and towards the base.

Unit 2 in Figure 1-07 is a sandstone and mudstone facies,

with a major increase in the frequency of coarser-grained

sediments relative to Unit 1. In Unit 2, massive mudstones

become less common and the rocks are dominated by fine- to

medium-grained, planar to trough cross-bedded sandstones.

Unit 3 in Figure 1-07 is a pebbly sandstone facies. It

consists of thick-bedded, coarse-grained pebbly sandstones in

flat laminated to trough cross-bedded units. The pebbly beds

frequently exhibit scoured bases which may be indicative of

erosion by migrating alluvial channels. The frequency of these

channel-fill deposits increases towards the top of the unit.

Unit 4, the conglomerate sandstone facies, is not present

along the tunnel alignment and is not shown on Figure 1-07.

Orange Mountain Basalt: A series of extrusive basalt flows

are interbedded with the clastic sedimentary rocks of the

Brunswick Group. The Orange Mountain Basalt is the oldest of

these. It is composed of columnar basalt and is interbedded with

a minimum of two volcanoclastic units. The cumulative thiCkness

of the formation varies between 300 and 650 feet.

Feltville Formation: The Feltville Formation contains red

siltstone and sandstone, with some buff gray and white .

feldspathic sandstone, and a thick, laterally continuous, non-red

1-6

r·Jb

~

TIERRA-A-017404
valleys carved into the underlying bedrock that were filled with

glacial sediments during the Pleistocene Epoch. Buried glacial

valley deposits traversed by the tunnel are classified by

Stanford, et al., (1990) as lake-bottom, deltaic and lacustrinefan and fluvial. Lake-bottom sediments consist of silt, clay,

and'fine sand deposited on the bottoms of glacial lakes. Th~

deposits may be as much as 250 feet thick. Deltaic and

lacustrine-fan deposits consist of sand and gravel which were

deposited as deltas and fans in glacial lakes. These lacustrine

deposits may locally overlie lake-bottom sediment, and they may

be as much as 200 feet thick. Fluvial sediments represent sand

and gravel deposited in valleys not occupied by glacial lakes.

These outwash deposits are generally less than 50 feet thick

(Figure 1-10).

Joints are pervasive features of the rocks of the region. A

prominent set of vertical joints roughly paralle~s the strike of

the rocks (Vecchioli, 1967; Vecchioli, et al., 1969). A second

well-developed joint set trends perpendicular to the strike.

Also, joints and fractures are often well-developed along bedding

planes. Locally, steeply dipping joints occur which are oblique

to the primary joint sets. The distribution of joints and

fractures in the rock is very irregular ..

Major and minor faults also occur in these rocks.

Generally, the faults trend towards the northeast (Vecchioli,

1967). Along the tunnel alignment, five inactive faults have

been observed or inferred near the basalt flows of the Orange

Mountain and Preakness Basalts (Figure I-OS). The faults are

relatively narrow, ranging from about 6 inches to 4 feet. across.

Vertical zones of enhanced fracturing and brecciation up to 100

feet wide are associated with these faults (USACE, 1992).

3. Regional Hydrogeology

Three types of stratigraphic units can generally be defined

in the project area. These include sedimentary rocks of the

Brunswick Group, basalt flows of the Brunswick Group, and

unconsolidated sediments (Hoffman, 1989a; Gill and Vecchioli,

1965; Nichols, 1968; and Hoffman and Quinlan, 1994). These

groupings are exceptionally broad as the hydrogeologic properties

and hydraulic interconnection of these units are very

heterogeneous.

The sedimentary rocks of the Brunswick Group contain both

confined and unconfined aquifers. Unconfined conditions

generally occur in upland areas where overlying unconsolidated

deposits are thin or absent. Confined and semi-confined

conditions exist in lowland areas, especially where clay beds in

th7 unconsol~dated Qu~t~rnary deposits mantle the underlying rock

un~ts. Conf1ned cond~t~ons may also occur directly beneath the

basalt flows of the Brunswick Group, as well as beneath zones of ,>

1-8

r'O

TIERRA-A-017405
low hydraulic conductivity within the sedimentary rocks

themselves (Nichols, 1968).

The sedimentary rocks of the Brunswick Group generally have

low intergranular hydraulic conductivities. However, fractures

in the rocks are capable of transmitting significant amounts---of

water. Fracture zones in the rock are the most important

aquifers in the region. The best producing wells in Essex County

are~or the most part completed in sedimentary rocks and are

between 300 and 400 feet deep. Wells generally draw water from

several zones of relatively high hydraulic conductivity (Nichols,

1968) .

The anisotropy of hydraulic conductivity is widely described

in interpretations of drawdown induced by pumping wells

(Vecchioli, 1967; Nichols, 1968). Drawdowns are generally

greatest parallel to strike; intermediate drawdowns are observed

in the dip direction, and the minimum drawdowns are observed

perpendicular to the other two directions. Vecchioli et al.

(1969) demonstrate that-wells in the Brunswick sedimentary

aquifer produce water from isolated, very thin discrete zones.

Additionally, the importance of localized zones of high hydraulic

conductivity in designing effective monitoring wells has been

noted by Hewett (1990), Michalski (1990), and Vecchioli, et al.

(1969).

At least two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the

anisotropic hydraulic properties of these rocks, and the

localized zones which transmit water through them. One

hypothesis, suggested by earlier observers (e.g., Herpers and

Barksdale, 1951) emphasizes the role of a near vertical set of

fractures which trend parallel to the strike of the rocks.

Another hypothesis, argued by Michalski (1990) and Hewett (1990),

postulates that the rocks are composed of a series of thick

tabular aquicludes alternating with aquifers several tens of feet

thick. The aquifers extend downdip for a few hundred feet and

extend along strike for thousands of feet. A detailed

explanation for the geologic nature of these aquicludes and

aquifers is lacking.

The basalt flows of the Brunswick Group generally have low

hydraulic conductivities. However, these rocks often contain

abundant fractures. Wells drilled into the basalts produce small

quantities of water, generally from depths of less than 300 feet

(Gill and Vecchioli, 1965). The basalt flows locally serve as

confining units between higher hydraulic conductivity zones of

the sedimentary rocks of the Brunswick Group (Nichols, 1968).

The unconsolidated sediments of the region include glacial

and nonglacial deposits of great variety and complexity (Figure

1-09). For the purposes of this general overview, these deposits

will be classified (following Stanford etal., 1990) as till,

lake-bottom sediment, deltaic and lacustrine fan sediment,

TIERRA-A-017406
fluvial over lacustrine sediment, and fluvial sediment. This

classification and the following discussion are limited to

deposits of Pleistocene age, as these deposits are by far much

more extensive than Holocene fluvial and marsh deposits of the

region.

Unconsolidated Pleistocene deposits have extremely varied

hydrogeologic characteristics. Till consists of nonstratified

and nonsorted material deposited by a glacier. It is generally

composed of silt, sand, gravel, and boulders. Units composed of

till may serve as unconfined aquifers where they are thick and

sandy. In many areas, deposits of till are discontinuous and of

limited significance. Lake.bottom sediments are generally made

up of stratified clay, silt, and fine-grained sand deposited on

tlie~bo~~Qins-__o~_.glacia1-:Cakes.- Lake bottom depos; ts do ]Jot yi eld

a si ificant antit of water, and usuall act as a"

·seiii£:confiningaqu1clu e. In .s~h.a~e~fiJ.,__~~e_.bqt.t:omusedi,ments

are underlain or overlain by stratified glacial deposits which

are-nfghly~pr6duct1ve aquifers. Fluvial sediments were deposited

by -meltwater--streams-and £ive-rs on alluvial plains or in stream

beds. Generally, they consist of stratified sand. Fluvial

deposits which overlie lacustrine sediments are typically

unconfined and are hydraulically connected to nearby bodies of

surface water. "Deltaic and lacustrine fan sediments are composed

of stratified sands and gravel that were deposited in glacial

lakes, usually near ice-water contacts.

The unconsolidated deposits in the project area reach their

greatest thickness and significance in buried bedrock"valleys.

At least six buried valleys are traversed by the proposed tunnel

alignment. Prom the southeast to northwest (Figure r-07), they

include:

(1) a lacustrine deposit over 250 feet thick in the Newark

area,

(2) a fluvial deposit over 50 feet thick in the valley of

the Passaic River just north of Newark,

(3) a deltaic and lacustrine fan deposit over 50 feet thick

a few miles west of Belleville,

(4) another deltaic and lacustrine fan deposit between SO

and 100 feet thick that fills a valley carved into the

Fe1tville Pormation along the Peckman River,

(S) a lacustrine valley fill deposit over 100 feet thick

which overlies the Towaco Formation, and

(6) an extensive lacustrine deposit over 250 feet thick

which overlies the Boonton Formation near the northern

end of the proposed tunnel.

IIDII/.-"'_/:L12Uzp~ __ 1-10

p"l~

TIERRA-A-017407
•

Although it is difficult to generalize on the basis of

limited data, it has been widely assumed that significant

hydraulic interaction occurs at least locally between the buried

valley deposits and the bedrock aquifers (Hoffman, 1989a, 1989b;

Hoffman and Quinlan, 1994; Gill and Vecchioli, 1965).

Hoffman and Quinlan (1994) have presented a conceptual model

of groundwater flow in the Central Passaic River Basin which may

be provisionally extended to the region along the tunnel

alignment. They suggest that groundwater in the area is

topographically driven, with recharge at higher elevations and

discharge at lower elevations. In the surficial unconsolidated

deposits, most groundwater recharge occurs where sands and

gravels are exposed at the ground surface. Where bedroCk

aquifers crop out near the surface, recharge can occur through

fractures and other zones of high hydraulic conductivity. ALter

entering the subsurface in recharge areas, groundwater flows

downward, then laterally, to discharge at lower elevations (i.e.,

stream channels) .

Groundwater discharge in the area can occur through several

mechanisms. Buried valley aquifers are often considered to be

discharge areas. Groundwater in buried valley aquifers may be

discharged directly to surface waters or through

evapotranspiration. Groundwater may also be locally discharged

from the bedrock aquifers directly to surficial aquifers which do

not lie in buried valleys. once groundwater enters these

surficial aquifers, discharge may occur directly to surface

waters or through evapotranspiration. Groundwater withdrawals by

production wells also constitute a major regional source.of

groundwater discharge (Hoffman and Quinlan, 1994; Nichols, 1968).

The conceptual model presented above is necessarily

simplistic: many exceptions are not only likely but certain as

groundwater flow patterns respond to local geology and

topography. Thus, the conceptual model presented above does not

provide a detailed basis for site specific prediction, but rather

as a generalized conceptual framework.

D. Groundwater Resources Along Tunnel Alignment

1. Sources and Capacities

Groundwater is used for municipal, commercial, industrial

and individual domestic water supplies along the tunnel

alignment. The degree of usage varies depending on the

availability of surface water and the hydrogeologic and economic

factors that would favor groundwater usage. Figures 1-11 A-B

show areas of the degree of groundwater and surface water usages.

Groundwater is derived from both the unconsolidated glacial

and alluvial materials as well as the fractured bedrock. Where

the unconsolidated materials consist of thick stratified sand and

I-l1

r- 2.0

TIERRA-A-017408
gravel deposits in buried glacial valleys, high capacity wells,

capable of pumping more than ~,000 gallons per minute (gpm), are

not uncommon, especially in the southern part of the Central

Passaic River Basin (Hoffman and Quinlan, ~994). However, except

for the extreme northern sectioD, high capacity wells in the

unconsolidated deposits are not known to have been drilled in-the

immediate vicinity of the tunnel alignment.

The fractured bedrock produces small to moderate and

sometimes large water supplies. However, as pointed out by

Hoffman and Quinlan (~994) the most productive surficial wells

yield mere groundwater than the most productive bedrock wells.

Nonetheless, bedrock wells, producing several hundred gpm in

places throughout the Newark Basin, are not unCOnmoD. For

example, during this present program it was seen that the a-inch

pumping well at the 2B site was capable of producing as much as

500 gpm. If the diameter of the well had been ~2inches or

greater, the sustained yield could easily have exceeded 1,000 gpm

because a high capacity pump could have been installed. There

was mere than 300 feet of available drawdown above the top of the

thin high yielding fracture that produced virtually all the

pumped water.

However, in two of the other three a-inch pumping wells

(Sites 2 and 2C), sustained pumping of as much as 30 gpm could

not have been continued largely because of hydrogeologic

constraints (major thin, shallow, water producing, bedding plane

fractures and/or nearby fault controlled negative boundaries)

discussed later in this report. The transmissivity of the rock

section at the 2B site was about seven times greater than at Site

2, about 13 times greater than at Site 3, and about 42 times

greater than at Site 2C. The above numbers demonstrate the

extreme variability of the amount of groundwater available for

utilization from the bedrock aquifers in the Newark Basin. They

also illustrate how the geology effects the quantity of

groundwater that could be pumped from the bedrock aquifers in

various places.

In the Hackensack River Basin, lying immediately east of the

Passaic River Basin, Carswell (1976) reported that the zone of

most abundant and largest water-bearing joints and fractures in

the rocks of the Brunswick Group occurs generally within 200 feet

of land surface in lowland areas of major streams and within 400

to 500 feet of land surface in upland areas.

Carswell (1976) also stated that reported yields of

industrial and public-supply wells tapping the Brunswick Group in

the Hackensack River Basin are as 1lDJchas 600 gpm. The median

yield is ~oo gpm.

In Union County, immediately south of the southern part of

the tunnel alignment, Nemickas (1976) pointed out that the

average reported yield of 230 public supply, industrial and

1-12

p.ll

TIERRA-A-017409
commercial wells tapping the Passaic Formation, was 200 gpm. The

greatest yields were obtained from 109 large-diameter wells (10

inches or greater). The average yield from these large diameter

wells was reported as 310 gpm. The greatest frequency of

successful well completions was in the 150- to 350-foot depth

interval. About half of the 109 large diameter wells were ---

completed in this depth interval. Wells drilled between 200 and

600 feet deep had higher specific capacities than wells of

shallower or greater depths. Larger diameter wells had higher

specific capacities than 6-inch or 8-inch wells.

The Brunswick Group is the most important aquifer in the

southeastern one third of Passaic County which encompasses the

north-central alignment of the tunnel. Carswell and Rooney

(1976) state that reported yields of public supply and industrial

wells range from 50 to 510 gpm and the median yield is 130 .gpm.

Most of these wells are 200 to 400 feet deep. The median yield

of all public supply and industrial wells over 300 feet deep and

8 inches or larger in diameter is 230 gpm.

2. Groundwater Quality

In the unimpactedstate, chemical quality of groundwater

from both the unconsolidated and bedrock aquifers is usually good

for potable supplies. However, groundwater from the

unconsolidated deposits overlying the bedrock, commonly contains

excessive iron, i.e., greater than 0.3 parts per million (ppm) or

manganese, i.e., greater than 0.05 ppm that can be treated by

water distributors to comply with secondary drinking water

standards. High hardness is also common, causing exces~ive soap

consuming problems. However, there is no secondary drinking

water limit for hardness.

Groundwater from the bedrock of the Brunswick Group, through

which the tunnel will traverse, may contain some constituents

that may exceed drinking water standards rendering the water

undesirable for potable use without treatment. However, in the

city of Rahway in nearby Union County, south of the tunnel

alignment seven shallow rock wells yielded water of such poor

quality that it could not be used for public supply because

treatment could not be economically accomplished. Total

dissolved solids content ranged from 1,255 to 2,660 ppm, sulfate

content ranged from 503 to 1,710 ppm and the groundwater was very

hard (Anderson, 1968).

Deeper rock wells (more than 250 feet deep) would be

expected to generally yield poorer quality water than shallower

rock wells (Carswell and Rooney, 1976). Deep rock wells may be

expected to yield water having unacceptable sulfate and very high

hardness (Nemickas, 1976).

In Passaic County, Carswell and Rooney (1976) stated that

water from the Brunswick Group is moderately hard to very hard

1-13

f·22

TIERRA-A-017410
(89 to 540 ppm). The hardness is due mainly to solution of

calcium and magnesium sulfate minerals (such as gypsum) in the

rocks. The dissolved solids content ranged from 129 to 563 ppm.

In recharge areas groundwater is less mineralized than in

discharge areas.

Groundwater from the Passaic Formation in the lower area of

the Hackensack River Basin, is hard to very hard and highly

mineralized (Carswell, 1976). Here the water quality in both the

Passaic Formation and unconsolidated deposits is influenced by

water quality of the tidally influenced Hackensack River and

Newark Bay. Heavy pumpage has induced recharge of poor quality

water, high in chloride, from these sources. Carswell (1976)

also states that both surface and groundwater qualityirt the

lower Hackensack River Basin is influenced by the disposal of

large quantities of sewage and industrial wastes in the

Hackensack Meadows.

Serfes (1994) has recently completed a study of the natural

groundwater quality in the bedroc~ aquifers of the Newark Basin.

The following is the abstract of his report; which summarizes his

findings;

Chemical analyses of 169 water samples from 150 wells in the

bedrock of the Newark Basin show water to be generally fresh,

somewhat oxidizing, slightly alkaline, non-corrosive, and hard.

They are predominantly calcium-magnesiuM-sodium bicarbonate type

waters of good natural quality, but locally they may require

treatment for undesirable characteristics and constituents. The

most common problems are with the state-recommended secondary

drinking water standards. For the sedimentary lormations, the

standards exceeded are manganese (26.9 percent of samples

exceeded the standard), maximum hardness (20.8 percent exceeded

the standard), corrosivity (31.2 percent are corrosive), total

dissolved solids (13.6 percent exceeded the standard), iron (14.5

percent exceeded the standard), sodium (8.5 percent exceeded the

standard), and sulfate (8.2 percent exceeded the standard). A

few samples exceeded the state primary drinking water standards

for gross alpha particle activity (6.S percent exceeded the

standard), radium (only 2U Ra measured, 3 percent exceeded the

standard), and lead (only one sample, or 0.7 percent, exceeded

the standard).

3 . Groundwater Usage

In the southern portion of the area, most residents are

supplied with surface water, but many industries rely on

groundwater for their processes. At the northern end of the

alignment, most high capacity wells are used for public supply.

Several communities rely entirely for groundwater to supply their

residential population. Other communities have residents with

their own private wells. A breakdown of residential water usage

and locations of high capacity wells are shown in Figures I-IIA

TIERRA-A-017411
II. INVESTIGATIVE APPROACH

IT conducted a hydrogeologic field investigation to obtain

data at several proposed workshaft and inlet locations along the

planned Passaic ~el ali~ent. The.data fr~m the field

investigation and 1nformat10n from ava11able l1terature were-used

to develop groundwater models for five areas along the alignment.

IT used the USGS programs MODFLOW and MODPATH to develop the

mode!.s.

Pursuant to the project objectives discussed in the

Executive Summary and in Chapter I, Section A of this chapter

briefly discusses the field investigation approach and Section B

discusses the approach to groundwater modeling. A detailed

description of the approach and methods used for the field

activities is included in Appendix A.

A. Field Investigation Activities

Several field techniques were used during the groundwater

investigation. These included soil characterization and rock

coring, subsurface geophysical logging, short-duration

permeability tests (straddle-packer tests), installation of

multipart systems, and long-duration pumping tests. A summary of

the field activities conducted during the groundwater

investigation is provided in Table 11-01.

1. Soil Borings and Well Installation

To minimize the number of boreholes, samples, and field

tests required, the data needs of the groundwater and HTRW field

investigations were coordinated and field activities were

performed in conjunction with one another. IT completed a total

of 13 boreholes that were used to obtain data for the groundwater

investigation.

Pilot Boreholes: Three 4-inch pilot boreholes were drilled

into bedrock under the supervision of IT Corporation. Pilot

boreholes were completed at Workshafts 2B-K, 2B-F, and 2C. Pilot

boreholes at Workshafts 2 and 3 had been previously completed by

the USACE.

~mping-Test ~oreholes: Four a-inch pumping-test boreholes

were drilled into bedrock during the groundwater field

investigation. Pumping-test boreholes were completed at

Workshafts 3, 2, 2B-F, and 2C.

Overburden Borings: Six overburden borings were drilled

under the supervision of IT during the groundwater field

investigation. Overburden borings were completed at Workshafts

3, 2~-K, 2B-F, and 2C, and at the Pompton and Spur Inlet sites.

The orings were drilled to provide a monitoring well for

overburden groundwater at each of these sites. The stratigraphic

11-1

f. Z"i

TIERRA-A-017412
information obtained during completion of the pilot and pumpingtest boreholes helped to determine the intervals at which the

overburden wells were set.

Soil samples and rock cores were collected from the

boreholes for classification and for archiving in the USACB

warehouse facility in Bayonne, New Jersey. Samples and cores

were collected according to the standards of the ASTM. Grab

samples of cuttings from air-rotary drilling were also used to

classify rock in the pumping-test boreholes. The grab samples

were spoiled on site after the cuttings were classified.

Recovered soil samples were visually identified using the USCS

procedures. All rock cores were logged using the General

Guidelines for Core Logging provided by USACE.

Wells were const'ructed in each of the boreholes compl~ted by

IT. The pilot wells were completed as 4-incb-diameter open holes

in bedrock. The installations at Workshafts 2B-F and 2B-K were

constructed with two stages of casing through the overburden, and

the installation at Workshaft location 2C was a single-stage

construction. The pumping-test wells were completed as a-inch

open holes.in bedrock, with a single string of casing set into

the top of rock. The overburden wells were constructed with 2-

inch diameter schedule~40 PVC casing and well screen, and were

completed according to the guidelines for monitoring wells in the

NJDEP Field Sampling Procedures Manual.

2. Borehole Geophysical Investigations

Overburden and bedrock portions of pilot and pumping-test

boreholes drilled under IT supervision were subject to

geopbysical logging. Borehole geophysical logging was also

completed in the uncased bedrock portions of well C-23 (drilled

at 2B-F by USACB) and the pilot wells at Workshafts 2 and 3.

Natural gamma, spontaneous potential, multi-point

resistivity, caliper, and temperature and delta temperature

geophysical logs were performed through overburden and bedrock.

Bedrock portions of boreholes were also subject to high

resolution neutron density and neutron porosity logging. The

results of geophysical logging were used to help determine zones

for multiport installation and hydraulic testing.

3. Straddle-Packer Testing

Straddle-packer tests were completed at Workshafts 2C, 2B-P,

2B-K, 2 and 3 in uncased portions of pilot and pumping-test

wells. Intervals of testing were determined by a review of the

geologic and geophysical logs of each borehole. The results of

the straddle-packer tests were used to determine the zones to be

monitored by the ~tiport systems.

~l'I'.'./Dl/t.l2'3Ept __ II-2

,..,25

TIERRA-A-017413
4 . Mul tiport Monitoring systems

A Waterloo multiport monitoring system manufactured by

Solinst Ltd of Canada was installed in uncased portions of the

4-inch pilot wells at Workshafts 3, 2, 2B-K, 2B-F, and 2C. In

general, each multiport monitoring system consisted of a seri~-

of discrete zones isolated by a packer system. Zones to be

isolated by the multiport system were chosen by review of the

straddle-packer testing results, the geophysical log, and the

geological log. These zones were largely equivalent with the

hydrostratigraphic zones that were evaluated during the 8-hour or

72-hour pumping tests.

Three monitoring zones were tested with multipart systems in

the pilot boreholes at Workshafts 2B-F, 2B-K, 2C, and 2; two

monitoring zones were tested in the pilot borehole at .

Workshaft 3.

5. Pumping Tests

Step-drawdown pumping tests (step tests) were conducted at

the pumping wells at Workshafts 2B-F, 2C, 2, and 3. The zones

selected for testing were those found to be the most permeable at

the bottom, middle, and upper portions of the well during review

of straddle-packer test results, the geophysical logs, and the

geological log. The purpose of the step tests was to determine

the optimal pumping rate for each zone for the 6-, 8-, and

72-hour pumping tests.

Six- or a-hour pumping tests were completed on the zones of

relatively high permeability that were not designated for a

72-hour pumping test. Two B-hour tests were completed at each of

Workshafts 2 and 3, and one 6-hour test and one a-hour test were

completed at Workshaft 2C. Pumping rates for the 6- and 8-hour

tests were selected after evaluation of step-test results.

Pumping rates were selected so that the aquifer would be

sufficiently stressed to provide adequate drawdown but would not

dewater.

Pumping tests of 72-hour duration were performed on the

zones of highest permeability at Workshafts 2, 2B, and 2C. The

pumping rates for the 72-hour tests were determined by an

evaluation of step-test results. Pumping rates were selected so

that the aquifer would be sufficiently stressed to result in

adequate drawdown for analysis without dewatering.

6. Well Abandonment

At the conclusion of the groundwater investigation, the

overburden wells at Workshaft 2B, the five multipart wells and

the four pumping-test wells were sealed and abandoned acco~ding

to NJDEP regulations.

II-3

TIERRA-A-017414
recovery have been averaged for derivation of transmissivity and

coefficient of storage estimates using the Theis curve. After

about 200 minutes both trends depart from the Theis curve trace

showing effect of boundaries. Two negat~ve boundarie~ have been

estimated based on evaluation of trends 1n both the p110t and

pumping wells. Using the derived value of transmis~3ivity o~--

3,820 gpd/ft and coefficient of storage of 3.2 x 10 shown 1n

Figure 111-33, the distance to both boundaries from both wells

was estimated at about ~1S feet. The directions of the boundary

trends may be parallel to the line between the two wells but it

is not known whether they lie to the north or south of that line

or whether the two boundaries straddle the two wells.

The coefficient of storage suggests that semi-unconfined

conditions occur in the upper zone.

(b) Summary of Workshaft· 2 Results

Figure 111-34 gives estimates of aquifer parameters in

individual depth zones from all available information gathered at

Workshaft 2 during this program. Because the thickness of the

upper saturated zone is greater at the pilot borehole/multiport

well, the estimate for this parameter is taken as 100 feet.

3 . Workshaft 2B

Field investigation results for Workshaft 2B were obtained

using a variety of investigative techniques including

geotechnical, geophysical, and hydraulic analyses. The intrusive

field investigations at Workshaft 2B included soil sampling and

rock coring within five soil borings; soil and rock

characterization; and the.installation of two overburden wells,

one 8-inch diameter pumping-test well, and two 4-inch multipart

wells. In addition, geophysical and hydraulic testing were also

completed at Workshaft 2B. The results from these field

investigations provided the information needed to characterize

the hydrogeologic environment, estimate aquifer parameters for

groundwater modeling, and incorporate with data from other

locations to develop a regional hydrogeologic framework of the

Passaic River Flood Protection Project area. The Workshaft 2B

groundwater investigation area is shown in Figure II1-3.

a) Workshaft 2B Soil and Rock Characterization

Results

IT Corporation supervised the completion of five boreholes

at Workshaft 2B. A pilot hole and an overburden well borehole

were completed at the Keegan property (2BK). A pilot hole, a

pumping-test well boring, and an overburden well boring were

completed at the Fiore property (2BF). The pilot boreholes,

1T-2BK-PB01 and IT~2BF-PB01, and the pumping-test well borehole,

IT-2BF~PW01, were each advanced to a total depth of 510 feet.

The 2BK overburden well boring, IT-2BK-OB01, was advanced to a

111-15

roz?-

TIERRA-A-017415
depth of 22 feet and the 2BF overburden well boring, IT-2BF-OBOl,

was advanced to a depth of 114 feet. In addition to the

aforementioned boreholes, IT also supervised the extension of

USACB pilot hole number C-23 from its previous depth of 500 feet

to a total depth of 650 feet below ground surface. The boring

logs for Workshaft 2B are included in Appendix B.

Soil characterization samples were collected from the upper

50 feet of overburden in the pilot boreholes and from the 2BK

overburden well boring at 4-foot intervals using carbon-steel

split-spoon samplers. The remaining overburden in the pilot

holes, as well as the entire column in the 2BP pumping-test and

overburden well borings, was sampled at 5-foot intervals or at

changes in lithology to the top of bedrock. Additionally, soil

samples for chemical analysis were collected from the 2BK pilot

and overburden-well boreholes using stainless-steel split spoons.

Four so~l sa les from IT-2BK-PBOl ana two soil samples from IT2BK-OBOl were sub~tte or c e~ca analysis. The resu ts 0

l:he chemical analyses are discussed in the HTRW Report (January

1995) for this project.· Totals of 36 and 7 disturbed (split

spoon) samples were collected from the 2BK pilot and overburdenwell boreholes, respectively. Por the 2BF pilot, pumping-test,

and overburden-well boreholes, the totals were 47, 51, and 16,

respectively. In addition, IT collected two undisturbed samples

from fine-grained sediments in the 2BF pumping-test hole using

thin-walled samplers (4-inch diameter Shelby tubes) .

The stratigraphy in IT-2BK-PB01, from ground surface to the

top of competent bedrock at 155 feet, consists of refuse and soil

fill material to a depth of 6 feet; organic soil with fill

settled in to 9 feet; gray, sandy silt and silty sand to 20.5

feet; medium to coarse sand and fine gravel to 25 feet; brownishgray, silty sand and sandy silt with clay to 50 feet; gray to·

reddish-brown, varved clay and silt with thin sand seams to 100

feet; silty sand, varying in grain size from very fine to mediumcoarse, to 140 feet; and glacial till to 155 feet. A large

boulder was discovered from 141 to 148 feet within the till. The

stratigraphy in the 2BK overburden borehole is similar, with fine

to coarse sand from ~2 to 22 feet in depth, where the borehole

was terminated.

The overburden stratigraphy at Workshaft 2BF, from ground

surface to the top of competent bedrock at 285 feet, consists of

fill material (fine to coarse sand with gravel and silt) to 14

feet; grayish-brown, silty, fine to coarse sand to 45 feet; gray

to reddish-brown, varved clay and silt with thin sand seams to

132 feet; and glacial till to 285 feet. The till consists of

gravelly sand with silt, clay, cobbles, and boulders.

The bedrock at the Workshaft 2B location is indicative of

the lowermost unit of the Passaic Formation. The facies

represented is that of a shallow, oxidizing lacustrine

environment that was subjected to alternating wet and dry

III-16

r- 2'"

TIERRA-A-017416
periods. It consists of interbedded, moderate-reddish-brown

shale and siltstone. Below 330 feet in IT-2BK-PB01 and 390 feet

in IT-2BP-PB01, 0.1- to 2-incb-thick beds of gypsum exist, on

average, at I-foot intervals within the siltstone. Gypsum beds

were also encountered in the portion of C-23 cored by IT. The

gypsum represents dry periods at the edge of a lake, when the--

evaporite deposits formed on the mud flats. The medium-soft

bedrock is fissile to medium-bedded, and contains calcite-filled

bedding joints. The bedding planes are horizontal to gentlysloping. The degree of weathering decreases with increasing

depth, except for a few isolated zones.

The rock quality designations (ROD) for core runs from IT2BK-PB-01 ranged from 15 to 100 percent and averaged 77 percent.

Most of tbe low RODs occurred above 300 feet; the average ROD

below 390 feet was 100 percent. The ROD for core runs from IT2BP-PBOl ranged from 55 to 100 percent and averaged 91 percent.

The ROD for C-23 below 500 feet averaged 100 percent. The core

recovery for all three boreholes was very nearly 100 percent.

Fractures occurred throughout the rock column at intervals of

approximately 0.25 to 10 feet.

During drilling of IT-2BK-PB01, about 2 gpm of water was

lost at the depths of 169 to 183 feet and 230 to 243 feet. Water

losses of 15 to 20 gpm occurred below 255 feet in IT-2BK-PB01,

below 365 feet in IT-2BF-PB01, and below 500 feet in C-23.

Bstimated water yields during air-rotary drilling of IT-2BP-PW01

consisted of 15 to 20 gpm at 365 feet and 300 gpm at 370 feet.

The well yield increased to 400 gpm at 410 feet and increased a

little more at 460 feet.

b) Workshaft 2B Well Installation and

Development

IT supervised the installation of a well in each of the five

boreholes at the Workshaft 2B locations. The pilot and pumpingtest boreholes were cased through the overburden and 5 feet into

competent bedrock. The pumping-test well, IT-2BF-PW01, is an

open hole in bedrock to a depth of 510 feet, which is the same

depth as the pilot boreholes. The overburden wells, IT-2BK-OB01

and IT-2BP-OB01, were constructed with 2-inch PVC pipe in

conformance with the May 1992 NJDBP standards, and are screened

from 12 to 22 feet and 104 to 114 feet below ground surface,

respectively.

After the initial well construction and based on the results

of straddle-packer testing, multipart systems were installed in

the pilot boreholes. The zones that were packed-off for

hydrogeological analysis in IT-2BK-PB01 were at depths of 149 to

187 feet, 195 to 234 feet, and 244 to 510 feet. Transducers and

sampling ports w~re installed within these zones at depths of 172

feet, 223 feet, and 257 feet, respectively.

III-17

r,2'1

TIERRA-A-017417
The wells at the 2BK location were completed with a

protective steel casing to a height of approximately ~.5 feet

above the ground surface. The wells at the 2BF 10cat1on,

including USACB well C-23, were completed with flush-mounted

protective covers. The well construction records for Workshaft

2B are included in Appendix C.

Each well at Workshaft 2B, including well C-23, was

deve~oped until the water was sediment-free or ~~il the pH, .

conductivity, and temperature of the water stab1l1zed. The p1lot

wells were developed after the casing was set but before the

installation of the multiport systems. The two pilot wells, the

pumping-test well, the 2BF overburden well, and C-23 were all

developed using the air-lift technique. IT-2BK-PBOl was

developed for 7 hours at a discharge rate of approximately 40

gpm; IT-2BF-PBOl was developed for 9 hours at 20 gpm; IT-2BF-PWOl

was developed for 6 hours at 400 gpm; IT-2BF-OBOlwas developed

for 2.5 hours at 1 gpm; and C-23 was developed for 7.5 hours at

5 gpm. IT-2BK-OBOl was developed by overpumping at 2 gpm for 2

hours. The well-development logs for the Workshaft 2B wells are

included in Appendix D.

c) Workshaft 2B Borehole 'Geophysics

Geophysical logs were run in the 2BF pumping well and pilot

boring, C-23 pilot boring, and 2BK pilot boring. The geophysical

logs are included in Appendix B.

The density logs show beds of more dense material'to beds of

less dense material with relatively thin bedding. These,are

probably due to the sandstone/shale interbeds. Most notable are

the large fractures at the 2BF pumping well at a depth of 365

feet below top of casing (BTOC). Fractures occur in the 2BF

pilot boring at 345-385' BTOC and at C-23 at a depth of 345 feet

bgs. Fractures also occur at 2BK pilot boring 325-335 feet BTOC.

C-23 density log indicates several fractures at a depth of

210-250 feet bgl. The rest of the boring is relatively tight.

2BK pilot boring displays fracturing to a depth of 390 feet BTOC,

then becomes tight. The pumping well shows possible fractures at

460 and 485 feet.

Gamma logs indicate the presence of shale and siltstone or

sandstone interbeds. The pilot borings show a greater percentage

of clay rich material, probably due to the coring of the wells.

Overburden clay material tends to increase to the top of bedrock.

The neutron log at the pumping well shows a uniform amount

of water bearing material throughout the rock column. At the

depth of the fracture zone no deviations are noted. Neutron logs

at 2BF pilot boring shows a trend of decreasing water from 200

feet BTOC to the bottom of the well. Uniform distribution

patterns also exist for C-23 and the pilot boring at 2BK.

III-IS

TIERRA-A-017418
Multi-point resistivity logs show alternating beds of shale

and siltstone/sandstone in uniform patterns throughout the rock

column in each well. Resistivity tends to decrease as the bottom

of the boring is approached.

caliper logs show uniform boreholes for the S-inch pumping

well and the 4-inch pilot borings. Temperature logs show an

average groundwater temperature of 53 degrees F. Temperature

tends to increase to as the bottom of the borehole is approached.

d) Workshaft 2B Hydraulic Testing

Hydraulic testing by IT at the 2B site included straddlepacker tests in the pilot borehole and pumping well at 2B-F and

the pilot borehole at 2B-K. After the multiport systems were

installed in the pilot boreholes at 2B-P and 2B-K, one successful

step test and one 72-hour pumping test were run at relatively

high capacity in the only zone of high permeability in the

pumping well at 2B-P. For this pumping test there were 3 rock

observation wells: the two multiport wells (2B-F and 2B-K) and

the CENAN borehole C-23. The 2B-P multipart well is located 80

feet from the pumping well. The 2B-K multiport well is 1,327

feet southwest of the pumping well, approximately along the

geologic dip direction. Therefore 2B-K is updip from the 2B-F

site. C-23 is 709 feet approximately downdip from the pumping

well.

Because the water pumped from the pumping well had

contaminants as seen by the analysis from water collected during

straddle-packer tests in the pilot hole at 2B-P, a carbon system

unit was installed by IT to remove contaminants before discharge

to a nearby storm drain ~n the Fiore parking lot. The overburden

wells were not affected by the pumping. The raw data files for

the hydraulic testing at Workshaft 2B are included in Appendix F.

(1) Straddle-Packer Testing

Figure III-35 shows results of the one successful packer

test run in the pumping well. The table below shows results of

this packer test as well as the depths of two other attempted

tests.

i Depth of packed off zone 1 hr. Specific Capacity

in feet below top of (gpm/drawdown in ft) and remarks

casing

290-340

(only one packer at 340t

) Not determined - very tight zone

340-390 18.6

390-440 Not determined - very tight zone

III-19

p,2'

TIERRA-A-017419
Figure 111-36 shoWS results of the straddle-packer testing

at the pilot borehole at 2B-F. Based on drilling activities of

the pumping well, 80 feet away, it was shown that a very high

yielding zone should have been in the 365- to 390-foot Cbgl)

depth interval. Specific capacity measured at the end of one

hour or less of pumping was used to evaluate relative

permeability with depth for installation of the multiport system.

The table below summarizes specific capacity data from packed off

zones in the pilot borehole at 2B-P.

Depth of packed off zone Specific Capacity Cgpm/drawdown in

in feet below top of ft) and remarks

casing

343-353 0.007 - tight zone

364-374 0.08

380-390 0.57

I

438-448 I

i 0.0003 very ticrht - zone

485-495 0.00022 - very tight zone

Figure 111-37 shows the results of the straddle-packer

testing at the 2B-K pilot hole. Specific capacity was again

judged to be the most appropriate method for comparisons of

relative permeabilities of rock zones with depth and to determine

where the multipart packers and transducers should be·set. The

table below shows results of the straddle-packer testing in the

pilot borehole at 2B-K. .

Depth of packed off zone Specific Capacity (gpm/drawdown in

in feet below top of ft) and remarks

casing

170-200 0.04

I 225-255 I 0.16

~ 275-305 I 0.53 I

315-345 0.61

355-385 II 0.16

400-430 0.0004 - very tight zone

450-480 , 0.0005 - very tight zone I

III-20

TIERRA-A-017420
(2) Pumping Tests

. (a) Highly Permeable Zone

(338-388 ft bgl)

After an unsuccessful attempt to run a step test on AUgus~-

9 1994 in the zone from 390 ft to the bottom of the hole, a high

c~pacity step test was performed on August 11, 1994 in the packed

off zone between 340 and 390 feet below top of casing in the 2E-F

pumping well. The first attempt was stopped because of the very

low permeability below 390 feet. Por the 340- to 390-foot zone,

three rates were run, at 145 gpm, 174 gpm, and 182 gpm.

Pumping was for one hour at each rate. The pumping· episodes

were separated by 1 hour recovery periods. One hour ~pecific

capacities were very high: 45.3, 48, and 43.6 respect~vely.from

lowest to highest rate. Figure 111-38 shows total step tests

results with subsequent water level data. Three other diagrams

are included, showing the same data except that each zone

monitored is plotted differently, for closer inspection. It is

seen that during and following step testing, there were

interference effects from localized and more distant pumpages.

This is discussed further below. The water levels during step

testing show that there is hydraulic connection above and below

the packed off zone being pumped .

.'. Based on the step test results and the capacity limitation

\ of the water treatment facility, the pumping rate of 176 gpm was

selected for the 72-hour constant rate pumping test ..

Pigure 111-39 is an arithmetic graph of the pumping well

showing water levels before, during and after pumping at 2B-F in

the 340-390 foot zone. Of special importance is the water level

record for four days following shutdown. This effect was also

seen the previous week during step tests (Fig. 111-38). The

erratic water levels following and even during the step and 72

hour pumping periods showed conclusively that there are strong

well interference effects from regional groundwater pumpages

throughout the entire rock section. Inspection of the hydrograph

after shutdown of 2B-F-PW suggests at least three high capacity

pumping wells are pumping from the same horizon as the zone at

2B-P that was packed off for the pumping test. Analysis of the

drawdown data from the pumping well at 2B-F and the three

observation wells (2B-P pilot/multipart, 2B-K pilot/multipart and

C-23) suggests that interfering high capacity wells may be

located to the northeast and/or the southwest of the overall 2B-F

site in strikewise directions. The three interfering wells are

believed to be pumping almost constantly during the week but only

intermittently on the weekend, at individual rates probably

ranging from 125 to 225 gpm. There may also be other wells that

are pumping at lesser rates. Based on aquifer parameters derived

from the 2B-F 72 hour pumping test it is believed that the

interfering wells may be located as close as ~ to 1~ miles from

111-21

F' 1;

TIERRA-A-017421
any of the four wells used for the 2B-F pumping test. The

combined step test graphing (Figure 111-38) also shows that a

local, moderate to high capacity well affected the immediate

recovery in the pumped zone, but had no effect in the zones above

and below the packed off zone at 2B-F.

Figures 111-40, 111-41, and 111-42 are arithmetic records of

water levels recorded in the 2B-P pilot/multiport well, 2BK

pilot/multipart well, and the C-23 well, respectively, during and

immediately following the 72 hours of pumping. The greatest

drawdowns in the three latter graphs are due to connection with

the high producing horizon at the pumping well which is believed

to follow the bedding plane orientation. Geologic, drilling and

geophysical logs and test data show that the most highly'

permeable fractured and vuggy zone in the pumping well is only 2

feet thick from 372 to 374 feet bgl. This two foot zone may

connect with noted open zones at 2B-K and in C-23~ Because

ground elevation 'is about equal at the 2B-F, 2B-K and C-23 sites,

projection suggests a 6-degree dip to the NW of the highly

permeable horizon. The·arithmetic graph of the 2B-K well (Figure

111-41) indicates leakage from above during most of the testing

period. This is also consonant with step test results (Figure

111-38), where it is seen that there is some leakage from above

as well as below the pumped horizon.

Figures 111-43, 111-44, III-4S and 111-46 show analyses of

the drawdowns in 2B-F-PW, 2B-P pilot/multiport, 2B-K and C-23,

respectively. Recoveries were not used for analysis because of

the strong interference effects from extraneous sources. The

four semi-logarithmic graphs of drawdowns in the pumping .and

observation wells show the major well interferences as departures

from the initial straight line. Three distant wells, each

pumping 176 gpm have been synthesized. The first interfering'

well is located the closest to observation points. The second

and third interfering wells ~ppear to be located equally further.

Each of the 3 interfering wells are about equal distances from

all of the 4 wells evaluated for this pumping test (2B-F-PW, 28-F

pilot multipart, 2B-K and C-23). The major interfering wells

seem to have started pumping at about the same time that the

pumping test started and to have continued pumping at constant

rates for the entire 72 hours of the 2B-F pumping test.

The four values of transmissivity from the semi-log graphs

were averaged and that figure was rounded off to 30,000 gpd/ft.

The three observation wells gave values of coefficient of storage

ranging from 9.6 x 10-6 to S. 3 X 10-5

• The three values were

averaged and that figure was rounded off to 5.0 x 10·S•

(b) Summary of Workshaft 28 Results

Figure 111-47 gives estimates of aquifer parameters in

individual depth zones from all available information gathered at

111-22

r·1 "1

TIERRA-A-017422
c. Hydraulic Properties of Geological Materials

Two general types of geologic materials are considered to be

aquifers in the Newark Basin--sand and gravels deposits and the

Mesozoic sedimentary rocks. Fractured basalt c~ also be .

considered an aquifer in some cases. The geolog~cal mater~a~n

the Newark Basin that typically have the lowest values of

hydraulic conductivity are lacustrine (i.e., lakebed) silt and

clay deposits, unfractured basalt, and unfractured sedimentary

rock. Table IV-Ol summarizes values of hydraulic properties of

different geological materials that are cited in the literature.

OVer 650 pressure tests have been performed by the USACE in

boreholes drilled along the tunnel alignment. Nearly all tests

were performed on rock intervals at or near the depths planned

for the tunnel horizon. The results of these packer tests are

summarized in Figu~e rv-03. The data were transformed to log

values of the data 1n em/s, because the values spanned such a

large range. Por hydraulic conductivity values reported as "0",

the value was assumed to be less than 1.Ox10-7 em/so Several

tests yielded hydraulic conductivities values that were as high

as 1XlO-2 em/s, but most tests were less than 10-3 em/s. A

statistical evaluation of the data showed"the Feltville, Towaco,

and the Orange "Mountain Basalt Formations had the highest median

values of hydraulic conductivity (approximately 2.5XlO-4.em/s).

The PassaicPormation and the Preakness Basalt had the next

highest median values--about 5.0xlO-3 em/so The Boonton

Formation and the Hook Mountain Basalt had the lowest median

values 1.5x10-s em/s.

D. Summary of Previous Groundwater Modeling Studies

Groundwater models have been used to evaluate groundwater

flow systems in the Newark Basin in at least three previous

studies. Meisler (1976) used a two-dimensional finite-difference

code developed by the USGS which was an early precursor of the

MODFLOW code. The model was constructed in order to evaluate the

flow system in a buried valley sand and gravel aquifer in

southwestern Essex and southeastern Morris counties, which is

part of the Central Basin of the Passaic River watershed. The

sand and gravel had a range of hydraulic conductivity values that

were quite high (256 to 345 feet/day). The aquifer was overlain

by semi-confining glacial till and lacustrine deposits, that were

assumed to have a hydraUlic conductivity values ranging from

0.006 to 0.043 feet/day. The bedrock valleys are underlain

primarily by the Boonton Pormation, the Hook Mountain Basalt, and

the Towaco Formation. Meisler (1976) used a hydraulic

conductivity of 1.27 feet/day to represent the sedimentary rocks.

The Preakness Basalt bounds the southeast side of the valleys. A

value of 0.94 feet/day was used to represent the hydraulic

conductivity of the basalts. The model was used to simulate

historic drawdowns in the sand and gravel aquifer and to predict

future drawdowns under various well extraction scenarios.

alIlIt-t4/maJ/:r.u Uzpt:__ IV-IO

r- 51)

TIERRA-A-017423
I. Kearny Model

1. Introduction

The Kearny model area is located at Kearny, Hudson County,

starting from approximately 14,000 feet north of Kearny poinr-and

extending north to include Worksbaft 2B (Figure IV-OS). The

Passaic River intersects the model area at the northwest corner

(Figure IV-36). The model domain is rectangular, with the

longitudinal axis oriented parallel to the tunnel alignment. The

tunnel runs along the eastern boundary of the model area. The

model domain is approximately 10;000 feet long and 7,500 feet

wide.

Kearny model area was selected for modeling primarily

because:

• The area contains the Passaic Formation. Approximately

27,860 feet (26 percent) of the proposed tunnel will

pass horizontally through the Passaic Formation.

• The area contains a buried valley aquifer which is an

important source of water for communities and

industries in the immediate vicinity of the study area.

The proposed tunnel runs approximately 1S0 feet below

the buried valley aquifer.

• The area may contain locations with contaminated

groundwater which could result in possible exposure to

construction crews.

2. Surface Features

The model area is located primarily in Hudson County, but

extends approximately 1,000 feet across the county line into

adjacent Bergen County. The model area lies wholly within the

Piedmont physiographic province. The only surface water body in

the vicinity of the model area is the Passaic River (Figure

IV-36). The Passaic River meanders around the model area but

does not run into the model domain. The surface topography

within the study area is steep to gently sloping with surface

elevations ranging between B and 120 feet above mean sea level.

3. Geology

Post-glacial surficial materials located within the Kearny

model area include fill and estuarine deposits (Figure IV-37).

Glacial deposits include till and lacustrine deposits of glacial

Lake Bayonne, which consist of deltaic sands and gravels that

locally overlie lake-bottom silt and clay. The lacustrine

deposits are over 250 feet thick. The lake-bottom sediments

underlie the estuarine deposits, and in some cases, fill.

IV-49

f'~"

TIERRA-A-017424
.... .L'

The Passaic Pormation underlies all of the Kearny model area

(Figure rv-38). The contact between Unit 1 and Unit 2 of the

Passaic Formation bisects the model area, with unit 1 underlying

the southern part of the model area, and Unit 2 underlying the

northern part. The upper surface of the Passaic Formation is

highly irreguJ.ar within the model domain. In the northweste~

part, the top ot the Passaic Formation is at an elevation of over

100 teet. Toward the south, a buried bedrock valley with a

minimum elevation of 250 feet below mean sea level cuts across

the model domain. The Passaic Formation dips at six degrees

toward the northwest within the model domain and the strike is

approximately north 30 degrees east.

IT supervised the completion of five boreholes including a

pilot hole and an overburden well at the Keegan property (2BK);

and a pilot hole, a ,pumping-test well, and an overburden well at

the Fiore property (2BF). The pilot boreholes, IT-2BK-PBOl and

IT-2BF-PB01, and the pumping-test well, IT-2BF-PW01, were each

advanced to a total depth of 510 feet. The 2BK overburden well,

IT-2BK-OB01, was advanced to a depth of 22 feet, and the 2BF

overburden well, IT-2BF-OB01, was advanced to a depth of 114

feet.

The stratigraphy in the pilot hole, IT-2BK-PB01, from ground

surface to the top of competent bedrock at 155 feet, consisted of

refuse and fill material to a depth of 6 feet; organic soil to 9

feet; gray, sandy silt and silty sand to 20.5 feet; medium to

coarse sand and fine gravel to 25 feet; brownish-gray, silty sand

and sandy silt with clay to 50 feet; gray to reddish-brown,

varved clay and silt with thin sand seams to 100 feet; silty

sand, varying in grain size from very fine to medium-coarse, to

140 feet; and glacial till to 155 feet. The stratigraphy in the

2BK overburden borehole, IT-2BK-OB01, consists of fine to coarse

sand from 12 to 22 feet depth, where the borehole was terminated.

The overburden stratigraphy at Workshaft 2BF, from ground

surface to the top of competent bedrock at 285 feet, consists of

fill material (tine to coarse sand with gravel and silt) to 14

feet; grayish-brown, silty, fine to coarse sand to 45 feet; gray

to reddish-brown, varved clay and silt with thin sand seams to

132 feet; and glacial till to 285 feet. The till consists of

gravelly sand with silt, clay, cobbles, and boulders.

The bedrock at the Workshaft 2B location belongs to the

lowermost unit of the Passaic Formation. It consists of

interbedded, moderate-reddish-brown shale and siltstone. Below

330 feet in the pilot hole, IT-2BK-PB01, and 390 feet in IT-2BFPB01, 0.1- to 2-inch-thick beds of gypsum exist at l-foot

intervals within the siltstone. The medium-soft bedrock is

fissile to medium-bedded, and contains calcite-filled bedding

joints. The bedding planes are horizontal to gently sloping.

The degree of weathering decreases with increasing depth, except

for a few isolated zones. Fractures occurred throughout the rock

IV-SO

r··f~

TIERRA-A-017425
column at intervals of approximately 0.25 to 10 feet. Based on

elevation data from the pilot boreholes IT-2BK-PB01 and IT-2BFPB01 at the Keegan and Fiore properties, the Passaic formation

appears to dip northwest at 6 .

4. Hydrogeology

Two major aquifers are present at the Kearny model area.

They include the unconsolidated overburden aquifer and the

bedrock aquifer. The unconsolidated overburden consists of a

surficial sand layer ranging between 10 to 40 feet over most of

the area. The sand layer is underlain by 10 to 70 feet of clay.

Beneath the clay lies another layer of sand and gravel at the

base of the buried valley. '

The bedrock aquifer underlying the Kearny area includes

alternating beds of shale and siltstone/sandstone'. The bedrock

formation yields water primarily and almost exclusively from

joints and fractures in the rocks. The primary pore space in the

rocks are generally low; and water moves through them very

slowly. The formation has extensive fracture zones and has thus

acquired secondary porosity and permeability. Groundwater flows

in the aquifer through the joints and interconnecting fractures.

During the recent field investigation conducted by IT at

Workshaft 2BF, packer tests were performed at different intervals

of the Passaic Formation in IT-2BP-PW01 and IT-2BF-PB01.

Specific capacity at the end of the pumping periods for the

intervals ranged from a high of 18.6 gpm/foot of drawdown in the

fractured rocks to less than 0.00022 gpm/foot of drawdown in the

unfractured rocks. Specific capacity for the interval between

340 and 390 feet below top of casing in the pumping well was

determined to be 18.60 gpm/foot of drawdown and at the end of the

three 1-hour pumping periods during step testing (Figure 111-38),

it ranged from 43.6 to 48 gpm/foot. Specific capacity data were

not determined for the intervals between 290 and 340 feet; and

390 and 400 feet below top of casing in the pumping well because

the zones did not transmit any appreciable quantity of water.

Packer tests were also performed at seven intervals in the pilot

borehole at 2BK. The estimated values ranged between 0.0004 and

0.61 gpm/foot of drawdown. Specific capacity data were

determined to be 0.04, 0.16, 0.53, 0.61 and 0.16 gpm/foot of

drawdown at the intervals ranging from 170 to 200 feet, 225 to

255 feet, 275 to 305 feet, 315 to 345 feet, and 355 to 385 feet,

respectively. The zones between 400 to 430 feet and 450 to 480

feet were found to be very tight.

Pumping tests were performed at Workshaft 2B to determine

the hydraulic parameters in the most permeable rock zone, as

determined from the packer tests. HydraUlic parameters were

determined for the 50 foot interval between 338 to 388 feet

(bgl). The pumping test results indicate that the underlying

rock at the Kearny model area consist of alternating zones of

TIERRA-A-017426
- .-:- ..,

unfractured, low permeability rocks and fractured, high

permeability rocks. The upper rocks rans,ing betwe7n. 288 and 338

! feet bgl were determined to have hydraul1c conduct1v1ty of less

than 2. 8E-03 ft/day. The middle zone was the high permeability

fracture zone between 338 and 388 feet bg1. The hydraulic

conductivity of the interval was estimated to be approximatery-79

ft/day. The third zone, varying between 388 and 510 feet bg1,

was determined to be a very low permeability rock zone. The

hydraUlic conductivity of the rock within this interval was

estimated to be less than 1.lE-03 ft/day.

s. Model Design

Based on the hydrogeological reports and data obtained from

the USGS, the New Jersey Geological Survey, and the USACB boring

logs, a conceptual model including two main groundwater flow

systems was developed for the model domain. The conceptual model

includes the shallow groundwater flow system in the glacial

overburden deposits in the buried valley and the deeper

groundwater flow system· in the bedrock.

The shallow groundwater flow system includes a water table

which mimics the topo~aphy within the overburden

hydrostratigraphic un1t, and the Passaic River acting as the

dominant discharge boundary. Consequently, groundwater recharge

occurs in the upland areas and flows mostly south-southwest,

similar to the surface topography to discharge to the Passaic

River located approximately one mile south of the model domain. ,i

. -:..,~

The buried valley aquifer, which has a high hydraUlic

conductivity, is overlain by the semi-confining clay unit, and

the thin surficial sand layer. The sand and gravel in the buried

valleys are in hydraUlic connection with the underlying bedrock

aquifer. Based on the water level data collected by IT during

the exploratory investigation, the potentiometric head in the

overburden aquifer was higher than in the bedrock toward the

southern portion of the model. A downward vertical gradient and

leakage between the shallow and deep groundwater flow system

occurs in this area. In the upland areas, the overburden unit is

thin or completely absent. The bedrock is therefore exposed and

receives direct recharge from precipitation. Groundwater flows

down gradient from the recharge areas to the overburden and the

bedrock. Groundwater recharge into the surficial aquifer occurs

in areas where the bedrock dips below the overburden unit.

A numerical model of the Kearny area was constructed to

cover an area of 1,722 acres (approximately 2.7 square miles).

The model domain extends 10,000 feet parallel to the tunnel

alignment, and 7,500 feet in the direction perpendicular to the

tunnel. The model size was limited to 100 rows and SO columns. A

constant grid spacing of 100 and 150 feet was utilized in the

direction parallel and perpendicular to the tunnel alignment.

IV-52

p.1'l

TIERRA-A-017427
Ten layers were used to simulate the surficial and bedrock

hydrostratigraphic units within the model (Figure IV-39). Three

layers were used for the overburden, while seven layers were used

to simulate the bedrock. Layer one represents the topmost

permeable sand and gravel deposit within the overburden. Layer

two represents the semi-confining, low permeability lacustri~

deposit consisting of silty clay and varved clay. Layer three

represents the sand and gravel bed at the base of the bedrock

valleys. The three layers representing the glacial overburden

are discontinuous in the upland areas where the bedrock occurs at

shallow depth.

The distribution of permeable rocks within the bedrock is

unknown because very few boreholes have been drilled in this

area. Because such geologic information is unavailable, data

gaps were filled by repeating the geologic data obtained at

Workshafts 2BK and 2BF. Three repetitions of the· fractured

formation were included in the model design. These layers were

designed as alternating zones of low and high permeability rocks.

Three of the seven layers in the bedrock were used to simulate

fractured rock zones. The remaining four layers represented

thicker layers of unfractured rock. All the bedrock layers dip

at approximately 6 degrees in the northwesterly direction.

6. Hydraulic Parameters

Hydraulic conductivities for each of the bedrock

hydrostratigraphic layers in the Kearny numerical model were

obtained from the straddle-packer testing and pump testing

performed by IT Corporation at Workshaft 2B. Because hydraulic

conductivity is largely responsible for the distribution of heads

and the associated groundwater flow, the site-specific data were

considered to be preferable as model input parameters. One of

the considerations in the selection of the Kearny model area was

that field investigations could provide accurate site-specific

data. Site-specific hydraulic properties were not determined for

the overburden layers during the recent field investigation.

Hence, hydraulic parameters published in the literature were used

for these layers. Table IV-Ol provides a summary of published

data on hydraUlic properties of the rocks in the Newark Group and

unconsolidated glacial deposits.

Table IV-13 provides a summary of the hydraUlic properties

used in the calibrated numerical model of the Kearny area. The

bedrock aquifer was simulated to be anisotropic to account for

the relative difference in hydraulic conductivity between the

direction parallel and perpendicular to the formation strike. The

hydraulic conductivity in the direction parallel to strike (Xx)

was assigned to be two times the hydraUlic conductivity in the

direction perpendicular to strike (i.e., Xx/Ky-2.0). The

hydraulic conductivity in the direction perpendicular to the

bedding plane (~) was assigned to be one-tenth of the hydraulic

IV-53

p."'o

TIERRA-A-017428
conductivity in the direction parallel to strike (!tx). The

surficial aquifer was simulated to be isotropic.

7. Boundary Conditions

The boundary conditions for the Kearny model area include--

the following:

• Recharge due to precipitation into the surface layer

• Lateral constant head boundaries around the model

domain

• --No-flow impenneable boundary at the base of the model

The overburden aquifer has a surface boundary open to the

atmosphere, and receives recharge directly from precipitation.

Published data-in the literature reports that groundwater

recharge rate in the "glaciated Piedmont" is approximately 15

inches annually. (Canace et al., 1992). Therefore, groundwater

recharge due to precipitation into the model area was assigned

to be 15 inches annually. In the upland areas where the

surficial deposit is thin, the bedrock aquifer is simulated to be

unconfined. A-direct 'recharge of 12 inches per year was applied

in these areas. Constant head boundary conditions were assigned

around the model layers representing the overburden aquifer. The

-~ boundary conditions for the glacial overburden layers were

,,,--.,j} generated from topographic contour maps, but adjusted based on

water measurements from the field.

The lateral bOundaries of the bedrock were assigned constant

heads, which were also generated from the topographic contour map

and adjusted based on the water level data obtained from the .

field.

The bedrock upper boundaries are in contact with the

unconsolidated glacial overburden (Layer three). The model was

constructed to enable groundwater leakage between the surficial

and bedrock flow systems. The final boundary condition was a noflow boundary beneath the bedrock hydrostratigraphic unit.

8. Model Calibration

.Model calibration of the Kearny model consisted of coq>aring

simulated hydraulic heads to approximate water levels in the

study area, and comparing model computed baseflow with published

data in the Mesozoic basin. Model calibration of potentiometric

heads were performed where groundwater level data existed (i.e.,

the pilot borehole, IT-2BF-PB01, and the pumping well, IT-2BFPW01) at Workshaft 2BF. Calibration of the numerical model was

performed by adjusting model input parameters and boundary

conditions so that the model computed heads are within +/-1.0 ft.

of measured elevation. The numerical accuracy of water budget

IV-54

f' lil

TIERRA-A-017429
accounting for total inflow and outflow into the model was within

1t error tolerance.

The simulated groundwater flow in the overburden aquifer is

primarily in the south-southwest direction. The model-simulated

groundwater potentiometric heads in the overburden unit (Layer-1)

ranged from 5 feet to 20 feet above mean sea level. The modelsimulated heads in the buried valley aquifer (Layer 3) ranged

bet11een -10 and 12 feet mean sea level. Groundwater leakage

between the bedrock and the overburden aquifer was effectively

simulated in accordance with the conceptual flow system.

Table IV-14 summarizes the flow rate in and out of the model

boundaries in units of cubic feet per day (cu. ft/day) to

facilitate a comparison of the flow rates within the surficial

and bedrock aquifer. Examination of the results obtained from

the calibrated model (Table IV-14) reveals a significant

groundwater interchange between the deep and shallow flow

systems. The total flow through the surficial aquifer was

estimated to be 1.0 mgd/sq. mile.~ompared with approximately 0.3

mgd/sq. mile in the bedrock aquifer. Approximately 7t of

precipitation into the surficial flow system leaks into the

bedrock aquifer. However, a net flow of approximately 39,238

cu.ft/day (2.3-inches) from the bedrock aquifer to the surficial

aquifer was simulated. The net recharge into the surficial

aquifer due to direct precipitation and from the bedrock is

approximately 12.78 inches. Published data in the literature

have reported recharge rate in the Piedmont province between 10

and 15 inches annually.

A total of eleven sensitivity simulations were performed to

investigate model sensitivity to hydraulic input parameters, such

as horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivities. Table IV~14

summarizes the model results and identifies the model input

properties that were varied. Simulations 1 and 2 investigated the

sensitivity of the model to changes in the horizontal and

vertical hydraulic conductivities in the surficial sand unit

(Layer 1). Simulation 3 investigated the model sensitivity to

changes in the horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivities

of the confining clay layer (Layer 2). Simulations 4 and 5

investigated model sensitivity to horizontal and vertical

hydraulic conductivities of the buried valley aquifer (Layer 3) •

Simulations 6 to 11 investigated model sensitivity to horizontal

and vertical hydraulic conductivities of the unfractured bedrock

aquitards I and the fractured bedrock aquifers. Bach parameter

perturbation was decreased or increased by one order of

magnitude. The results of the sensitiVity analysis indicate

that:

• Increasing/decreasing the horizontal and vertical

hydraulic conductivity values of Layer 1 causes 5-10t

change in net leakage from the bedrock into the

overburden aquifer.

m1lJ/t-N/DlI/L12Uzpt: __ IV-55

p''i~

TIERRA-A-017430
;. ,

Basalt. Theresu1ts of this model can be used to evaluate

potential impacts to well users from the Second Watchung Mountain

southeast to the First Watchung Mountain and Workshaft 2 location

(Figures I-l1C and IV-OS).

The maximum drawdowns predicted for unfractured bedrocr-were

155 feet immediately adjacent to the tunnel alignment. However,

maximum drawdoWDs calculated for the fractured permeable rock

layers were significantly less (about 3 feet of drawdown was

predicted). At 1,000 feet distance from the tunnel alignment,

drawdowns predicted for unfractured and fractured layers were

less than 10 feet and less than 1 foot, respectively (Figures IV33 and IV~3s). Zero drawdown is expected in the shallow sand and

gravel aquifer. .

In the vicinity of the Little Falls model, there is an.area

on the southwest side of the tunnel alignment that has been

identified as obtaining all water supplies from groundwater

(Figure I-11A). This area lies between the Passaic River and the

First Watchung Mountain; and south of u.s. Route 46. No high

capacity wells have been identified in this area, however.

Because .the area lies over thick sand and gravel deposits along

the Peckman River, it is likely that a majority of water supply

wells are drawing water from the surficial aquifer. These wells

should not be impacted by tunneling activities, since drawdown

impacts to the sand and gravel aquifer were predicted to be zero .

. ,j One high-capacity bedrock well (No. 98) was identified

within 5,000 feet of the tunnel alignment along the southeast

flank of the First Watchung Mountain (Figure I-11C). It.is

approximately 2,000 feet from the alignment; therefore, tunneling

activities should have a minimal effect on the water level in

that well, if at all.

4. Kearny Model Area and Areas North to First

Watchung Mountain

The Kearny model was used to simulate groundwater conditions

in the Passaic Formation. Approximately 27,860 feet of the

tunnel length (approximately 38 percent of the total length) will

pass horizontally through the Passaic Formation. @xploratory

investi ations and the results of acker tests and umping tests

indicate that the bedrock underl~1n7 t e Kearn~ area conS1sts 0

a series of thick. low-permeability unfractu~ rock layers that

alternate with thin zones of fractured rock. Hydraulic

conductivities in these discrete fracture zones were determined

to be as high as 80 feet/day, while the hydraulic conductivity in

the unfractured rock was less than 2.8B-03 feet/day. The bedrock

formation is overlain by a buried valley aquifer which is also an

important source of water for several communities and industries

in the Kearny area.

,

".1

TIERRA-A-017431
The areas around the Kearny model, including Harrison,

Kearny, and Bast Newark, obtain their ~ater supply fr~m sU7f~ce

water sources. However, 19 high-capac~ty we~ls were ~dent~f~ed

within 5,000 feet of the tunnel alignment (P~gure I-llB). The

wells include Well Nos. 101, 107, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 165,

166 167, 168, 178, 179, 181, 182, 210, 211, 218, and 219 tF1~re

I-liB). A11 of the wells listed above are completed in the

bedrock and are within 3,000 feet of the tunnel. However,

because the tunnel will be operated in the Wwet- condition,

drawdown effects in these 19 wells would be of very sbort

duration during construction and maintenance periods. Drawdown

predictions range from zero to 50 feet depending on the distance

from the proposed tunnel, bedrock characteristics, well deptb,

and duration of construction and maintenance activities.

" ..

5. Newark Bay Model Area

The Newark-Bay model located at Kearny Point is located

north of the tunnel outlet at Newark Bay. The model area is also

underlain by the Passaic Formation. Similar to the Kearny model

area, the results of the exploratory investigations and hydraulic

testing indicated that the bedrock formation includes thick

unfractured rock zones that alternate with thin fracture zones.

Typical hydraulic conductivity values for the thin fractured

aquifers were determined to be up to 1.87 feet/day, while the

hydraulic conductivity in the unfractured rock averaged 5.0£-03

feet/day.

Results of the transient tunnel simulations indicated that

short-term drawdown in the fractured aquifer will be less than 20

feet directly adjacent to the tunnel alignment, and less than 3

ft at 1,000 feet distance from the tunnel. The highest drawdowns

were predicted for the unfractured bedrock at the tunnel. .

However, rapid dissipation of drawdown in the low permeability

zones results in less than 12 feet of predicted drawdown at 3,000

feet distance from the tunnel alignment. No impact from the

tunnel was predicted for the glacial overburden aquifer.

The areas around Newark Bay, inclUding the cities of Newark

and Jersey City, obtain water supply from surface water sources.

However, three high capacity wells serving some industries were

identified in this region. The wells include Nos. 108, 33, and

34 (Pigure I-11B) located at approximately 2,500 feet, 5,000

feet, and 7,500 feet, respectively, from the tunnel alignment.

The high capacity well located closest to the tunnel alignment is

Well No. 108; it -i8 completed in the Passaic Formation at 300

feet 091. No significant impact due to the tunnel is expected at

the well location. The other two wells (Nos. 33 and 34) are

completed in the overburden at 165 feet and 300 feet bgl, and are

located at distances greater than 5,000 feet from the tunnel

alignment. No significant impact from the tunnel is expected in

these overburden wells.

V-6

p.I.{"f

TIERRA-A-017432
No other groundwater contamination problems were identified in or

near the Little Falls model area during the HTRW investigation.

4. Kearny Model Area

Three HTRW sites with known groundwater contamination are,\

located in or near the Kearny model area. Wallace and Tiernan, ~

Inc. is located approximately 1,000 feet from the tunnel

alignment between Workshafts 2A and 2B. Elevated levels of

arsenic and total petroleum hydrocarbons were reported for the

shallow groundwater at this site. Diamond Head Oil Refinery is

located approximately 300 feet from the tunnel alignment and

1,500 feet from Workshaft 2B-Keegan. Elevated levels of VOCs,

SVOCs, arsenic, lead, and cyanide were reported for shallow

groundwater at this site. Model results indicate little or no

induced drawdown of overburden groundwater is expected in this

model area. Therefore, mobilization of the shallow groundwater

contaminants at these two sites due to tunnel construction and

operations is not expected.

The third HTRW site identified in the Kearny Model Area is

Workshaft 2B. Deep groundwater collected from the highly

permeable zone was shown to be contaminated with up to 900 ppb of

chlorinated solvents. Shallow and deep groundwater at 2B also

contained elevated levels of lead and manganese. It is

projected that the tunnel will intersect the high-permeability

zone. A workshaft constructed at this location would intersect

the shallow and deep groundwater contamination.

5. Newark Bay Model Area

Two HTRW sites with known groundwater contamination are

located in or near the Newark Bay model area. Roadway Express,

Inc. is located approximately 4,000 feet east of the proposed

alignment and 4,000 feet from Workshaft 2C. Petroleum-related

contamination, including up to 10.6 feet of separate-phase fuel

oil, has been reported for shallow groundwater at this site.

Model results indicate that little or no induced drawdown of

overburden groundwater is expected to occur in this model area.

Therefore, mobilization of the shallow groundwater contaminants

at this site due to tunnel construction and operations is not

expected.

Groundwater contamination was reported for the Printers

Service site, which is located along the proposed alignment

between Workshafts 2B and 2C. Methylene chloride was reportedly

present at 2,000 ppm in groundwater at the site. The extent of

groundwater contamination and the depth to which contamination

has migrated are not known. As a conservative approach, it has

been assumed that contamination has spread to the bedrock

aquifer. Model results predict that induced drawdowns of

bedrock groundwater could reach 140 feet in the immediate tunnel

vicinity during construction and operations. Therefore, there is

V-IO

p,YS'

TIERRA-A-017433
Yablll 1~1

Hlgh-Capadty Overllurden w.n. InVklnlty of TunMI

P.... 1c IUnr Flood Pro_lion Pro)«t

~ ...""..

(~or~)

p

·742244

·74.3097

otOJl7lt7-=74.3058~

.to.iS -=

1

z

1

1 ..u.9936

1 40.lS98fJ • Wwn

41.0306 -. It Fnlnldln l k"

40.99 -74.2117 franldlnl k.

40.8122· -14.J()lS; FIIifI.

F~klnuk"

9

200

737

'0'0

l'

2

fA

tOOndian2

Bllndllnt

"/lndian3

•

9

5

WeI'

5 High Mtn

Source: NJDEP. Wlter Suppty Element. Bureau ofWlter MOCIlIlon. '994

Notu:

Permit numbers Jol\ow'ld by"w" Of 'p. must submlt annual of quarterly rapoc1:s.r~pec1Ively.

Permit numbers belwe<tn 4000 Ind 5999 Ira public supply permits.

Agrkultunll C.rtil\cIIlIon permits Ire prefixed 'PA' In Passaic: County.

Oeologlc fOfrMdon l.nd:

GQSO-Plels1ocene. Sbatifled drift cM~lt

GOGU-PMhtoc_. Gladal de~ll. pndl1Jlrantllltld

GTBH· Tertiary. Beecon Hill FomIllkifl

TIERRA-A-017434
hIM 1-02

Hlgh.eapaclty ~rock Wella In VIcln"r of Tunnel

P .... 1c RlY" Flood Prot.-ctlon Project

F"ig\iii '., r -PMnR 0Wiiif Of Will .lOCi! lilROde longifOOe ~ DiiiilCIpi lity Oipt/'l uMllogIc C8peclly

Identltk:allon Number (C«npafly ~ MUnicipality) Identlftallon

(ft.bgl) FClI'tMtIon (gpm) 37 S015 R!dp!wood ViII. Ames 5 "1.0058 ·7".1828 B.raen WyCkoff 350 GTRB 175

38 SOlS R Vill.ae Am.. 6 ~1.0058 ~:1828 Bergen Wyckolf ot5S GTRB 17S

39 SOt5 RIdo-ood Vibge Ames 7 "1.0058 . ·7".1625 Bergen Wyckolf 352 GTRB 175 "0 S015 R~V1nage ""- 3 .. 1.0058 r--:r.rlS26 Beraen WYCkoff 350 GTRB JOe

,,,

5067 RIv...daJe Borough 3 40.9689 ·74.2917 Moms RIYenbJe 195 ~!RB 10

42 --5067 RlvwdaJe Borough 2 "0.9689 ·7".2917 Moms RlverdeJe 108 GTRB 200

4J 5067 RIv...da" Borouati 1 "0.9992 ·74.2989 Moms Riverdale 1M GTRB _f 3O

.... SO77 ORANGE CITY ~1---~.n03 '7".2288 ES"ll Orange 506 GIRB 500

45 S077 ORANGE CITY e 40.76 ·7".225 ES"ll Oran~- 500 GTRB 600

----~-:46 5102 FAIRFIElO TOWNSHIP 2 -40.8n8 ----=? ",?903 . ESsell Falrlleld 279 GTRO 206

-~---~41

5102 FAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP 6 -40.8861 ·74294" _Esse. Fa~1d 202 GlRe 270

.--~-- :48---5102 ~-----~

B . -408972 ~;--

Fa~1d GTRB

Fairfield Township

~:~~~~ ~~sell 230 290

-----.9 --5102 '---- FAiRfielD TOWNSHIP e --408972 ·7".2833 ES"ll Falrlield 230 GTRB _?90

- '--Si02 f-~iRFIElD TOWNSHIP 7 ..OOT ·74.2792 Esse. Felr1leld 303 GTRB

50

390

----51 ---5114 f-ESSEX FEllS BOROUGH H 4O.aJ ·7".3088 ESsell Roseland 4SO GTRB SOO

--- ----52 --5it5 ESSEX FelLS BOROUGH 4C 40.84&3 -74.2878 ESsell WestCa~n 360 GTRB 120

------

5115 _~SSEX FelLS BOROUGH -"(r- --40.M69 '74.2888 Ea"ll WestCe~. 270 GTRB

53

200

s.4 5115 _~SSEX F~~LS BOROUGH 13 40.8517 ~_2867 ~~sell WestCa~n 254 GTRB 200

--~55 ---5i15 ESSEX FEllS BOROUGH 6 "0.8272 -7".2928 ESSell Easell Fen. 56S GTRB 300

----56 --5115 f-eSSEX FELLS BOROUGH 4A 40.&467 ·7".2692 Ess .. WestCa~. 195 GTRB 300

----51 --5fi5 -essEX FEllS BOROUGH II "0.8322 ·7".3008 Essell EasellFeIl. ..20 GTRB -==350 -----~58 --SiB ESSEX FellS BOROUGH 5 "0.8167 -7-4.2833 Esse. EIMllF.II. 295 GTRB __ 400

-------sg 5115 ESSEX FelLS BOROUGH 9 "0.8325 ·7-4.2978 Essell E&Hli Fell. 3&4 GTRB 400

60 5198 WALLINGTON BOROUGH 8 -40.8569 ·7".1306 Bergen WelHngton 503 GIRB 80

_.

61 5198 WALLINGTON BOROUGH 5 "0.8569 '74.1306 Bergen Wa'Hngton S06 GIRB ISO

62 5245 MONTCLAIR TOWN .~DW.l 40.e061 ·7".2103 Essell Montclair 300 GTRB 400

63 5245 MONTCLAIR TOWN RANDW.l 40.8061 ·7...2103 Essell Monlclllir 300 GTRB 400

64 5245 MONTCLAIR TOWN GLENFlD2 --40.8142 ·7".2117 Essell Montclllir 300 GTRB 600

65 52-45 MONTCLAIR TOWN GLENFlD2 40.81"2 '7".2117 Essell Montclair 300 GTRB 600 66 5260 GLEN RlooE WATER DEPT. 2 --40.8131 ·74.2028 Essell Glen RId~ 400 GTRB 300

67 5260 GLEN RlooE WATER DEPT. 2 "0.8131 ·7".2028 Easell Glen Ridge 400 GTRB 300 6lI 5282 GARFielD WATER DEPARTMENT

69 52112 GARFIELD WATER DEPARTMENT

18

..

40.9083 -7".1292 Bergen EImIovoodPert! 400 GTRB ---60 40.0063 -74.1292 Bergen Elmwood Pert! 353 GTRB 90

70 52112 GARFielD WATER DEPARTMENT 1 40.9083 ·7-4.1292 ~!!!- Elmwood Pert! 404 GTRB 100

it f--.5282 GARFIELD WA TER DEPARTMENT 17 40.9083 ·74.1292 Bergen -Elmwood Perk 72 5282 GARFIELD WATER DEPARTMENT 353 GTRB-- ~'--Ho 2 409083 '7".1292 ~~ Elmwood Pert 358 ~!!!B

73 5282 GARFielD WA.TER DEPARTMENT ---125 12 "0.0063 ·7-4.1292 Bergen Elmwood Parle 3SO GTRB 145

7.. 5282 GARFIelD WA TER DEPARTMENT 14 40.9083 ·74.1292 Beraen Elmwood Perk -4lI5 GTim- 140

75 52112 GARFIELD WATER DEPARTMENT 10 40.9063 ·7".1292 84trgen Elmwood Park 350 GTRB --ISO

I

-

TIERRA-A-017435
Table 1-42

Hlgh.capaelty Bedrock w.n. InVIcinity 01 Tunnel

' ••• aIc RJver Flood Protection Project f

18 5282 GARFIELD WATER IE "ARTMENT 040.9083 • '4.1292 Bergen Part JOO

=

OTRB 1511

II

1t

79 52112 GARFIELD WATER E 'AR1MENT 040.1lO83 - 4.1292 BeraIn 3153 0 rll 275

eo 5282 GARFIELD WATER EPARTMENT 040.9lI83 • r4.12113 IIerIIen Gertlel 4O:l 0 rfl «10

11 ~I Wrmel_1h1D «J.t1651 • 4.2511 Paasalc Wayn 252 0 rfl 75

5

8

30r Knoll

2811lumR

11---- 87 5317 FAIR LAWN BOROUGH <40.9281 ·7<4.1<411 Beraen Fair l.-n <413 GTRB 250

90 '006QW CARLSTADT - E. RUTHERFORD BOE 040.8253 -74.0978 a.rgen E.RutheffOfd 274 GTRB 125

11-----=91 '0' 26W FEDERAL BUSINESS CENTERS .co.7144 -1<4.1944 Eua N.-rk 475 GTRB 100

86 5J09 Wayne Town'" 40.9872 -74.2622 P."ale Wayno 203 GTRB 125

89 l0011W Medlcal·Prof.PlI./Condo Assoc:. <40.9.c58 -7<4.26" P.sSlIc WIYM 240 GTRB 200

92 10159W DSD,INC. 40.824<4 -74.299oe EU4lll ROMIIncl 398 GTRB 275

5A11wood

1 PlneIlk

18

19

GIBRALTAR

MAll WEll

1

WEll 1

Wa.'

WEll 1

WEll 1

WEll 1

5

2

3

WEll7

WEll 3

TIERRA-A-017436
hble 1-02

Hlgh-e8p.8clty ~ro<:k Well. In VIcinity or Tunnel

P .... 1c Riyer Flood Protection ProJect

C I'lgu"iir:n Permit ~orWiJ Local tili1iiai longltoo. CMIY- Munlc;lp8!ity o.pth G~lC- C8pe<:1Iy Idenl iftaItlon Numbef (Comp8ny Of Munlclpllllty) ldentll'atlon (It. bgl) Fornwtlon (gpm)

-Iii- 115 10672W ROCHE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM 1 ~.7683 -7-4.1i11 Eu.x Bel\evllie 602 GTRB 00 -

i;;" 116 10672W ROCHE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM 2 40.7683 C -7-4.1117 Essex Bel\evllie 610 GTRB 200 -

~

He 117 -i0672W ROCHE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM 2 40.7683 -7-4.1711 Eu.x Bellevtlle 610 GTRB 200 10696W Bec100 DlckenlOfl & Comp8nv 4 41.01-4-4 119 10696W ~;ct69? Bficien Frtnklln uk .. 420 GTRB :lO Bec100 DIckenson & Comr-ny 1 --410153

120

·7421 Beraen Frenklln uk .. 290 GTRB 40 t0696W Bec100 [)ic;kenson & Compeny 2 "4101iii ~~21i'ij Bergen FrtnkJln uk .. 348 GTRB 40 121 t07M

122 10114W MOTHER FOOD PRODUCTS INC.

INSULFAB PLASTICS INC. 1 40.8269 - -7-4099-4I-~rllen E.Rutherford JOO GTRB 225 t 40.7163 ~4.14iil Eu.x N8Wllfte 40.5 GTRB 100 123 10741W ALfRED HEllER HEAT TREATiNG co_ 2 -408839 ~~.t47~ ~;Ic; 124 10742W Clifton GTRB 150

-----125 ALfRED HEllER HEAT TREATING CO, 1 ~6a)9 ~~.w~ ~sUlIc Clifton JOO GTRB 200 10182W RoaiNHOOD CAR WASH 1 ~j9i1 ~~98J I---~u.x Bloomr .. 1d 205 GTRB 200 -

10782W RoeiNHooD CAR WASH 1 40.7917 Bloomftekl 1213

127 -10T8m ·74.1983 Essex 205 GTRB 200

.- 128

fAIRMONT CEME TERY ASSOCIATION 1 ~28 -74.2078 Essex Newerlc 6JS GTRS 150

-----129 lol9iw

10791W ~l.A3 MODEL RAILROAD CO .• INC. WElL 1 ~.7019 ·14.23-47 Union Hillside 138 GTRB 200 ATlAS MOOEL RAILROAD CO., INC. WELL 2 ~11

t30 loai5W ~~13-41 _Union HlIlslde JOO GTRB 200 GREENBROOK COUNTRY CLUB PUMPHOUSE --4[8689 ·74.2606 Essex Felrfleld 301 GTRB 60 131 10815W

132 2016P

GREENBROOK COUNTRY CLUB WelL 2 ~.8119-4~178 Essex Felrfleld 283 GTRB 150 ITT AVIONICS DIVISION 1 -----.o.e8 ·74.1389 ------133 2-!~sex Nutley 500 GTRB 150 -

2016P In AVIONICS DIVISION 2 40.825 ·7-41389 E,sex Nut..., 450

~~

---'50 13-4 2016P III AVIONICS DIVISION 3 40.825 ~389 Essex Nut~y 500 ~~B 150 - ~ 135 -204.4P GRANO UNION CO. ---.-0:7975 ~ --=~}J6 ~~~ ~!len N. Arlington JOO GTRB 60

-

2044P GRAND UNION CO. 40.7918 -74.1272 Beraen N. Arlington JOO ---- GTRB 60 131 -~2048P NATIONAL STARCH & CHEMICAL 1 -40.7994 ·14.189-4 Essex BIoomf.. 1d 410 ~!!~- --------rn 200 2048P ~fIONAL STARCH & CHEMICAL 1 40.799-4 -14.1894 Essex Bloomfield 410 139 2049P SIM CORPORATION ~!!- ==200 i 40.8069 ~-4.1106 I-~rgen Lyndhum 302 GTRB 200 140 2063P Hioh Mounteln Gold Club 3 40,9819 -14.1956 Berllen Frtnklln uk" 230 ~~B --so 141 2063P High Mounlaln Gold Club -4 ~.99 ·74.1956 Bergen Frtnklln uk" 160 GTRB eo 142

143 2063P

2063P Hloh Mounl.ln Golf Club 1 40.9861 ·14.199-4 Berllen Frtnldln Lek" 105 GTRB SO High Mount.ln Gor Club 2 40.9861 -14.1918 Bergen Frtnklln Lek.. 200 GTRB eo

-•

14-4 2073P ISP VAN DYK INC. 1 ~.1833 -74.15 Easex BenevUIe 352 GTRB 100 -

~

~ 145 2073P ISP VAN DYK INC. 1 40.1833 -14,15 E,S4x BeneYUle 352 GfRO 100 146 2013P ISP VAN DYK INC. 2 ~.7833 -14.15 ' Essex BeUevUIe 400 GTRB 150 - ~ 147 2013P ISP VAN DYK INC. 3 ~.7833 -74.15 Essex BelteYille 400 GTRB 150 ~~~_!~ 2073P ISP VAN DYK INC. 2 40.1833 ~~1~ Essex Bellev;l~ _.400 f--~ f ~ !!-.: --,SO

149 ~~~P ISP VANK DYK INC. J ----.0:7833 -14.15 Essell Belleville 400 GTRB --ISO 150 2081P CERTifiED PROCESSING CORP. , ~694-4 1-: 7i2239 Union Hillslde 202 ~!RB- ---'00 151 2061P CERTIFIED PROCESSING CORP. 2 -40.6912 ·14.2239 Union HIII$lde 6JO GTRB 250 152 ~~1P CERTIFieD PROCESSING CORP. 3 40.694-4 ·14.2239 Union Hillside

153 2Q92P GIVAUDAH·ROURE CORPORATION 1 40.82&4 -74.1297 Pesulc Clifton

I---~~

250 ~!~l- GTR ---,iO

--

TIERRA-A-017437
,~

T,bIel-42

Hlgh-C.paelty Bedrock We" InVIcinity of TurN

P.. uIa RIver Flood ProI.aIon ProJ-ct

Flgurll-" t'''''''' 0Wner~ Loa'- IAIlIUde COUIll1 o.pCh = (gpm)' ldentlllcatlon Number ~ny Of MunIc:/peMy) IdenIilIeatIon (Ilbgl)

1551

154

2092

2092P

GIV UIlAN·ROURE RATION

GIV UDAN-RO~RATION 7 40.8264 -74.1217 Paule CIfton 250 a iRB T10

156 2092 G EN RIDGE COON :VCLUB

t 40.8278 -7<4.13 Pnule ClIfton 281 arRB 235 3 40.82 ....

151 2092 G .EN RIDGE COON veLUB

- 4.1947 E.... Gllnlfldge 400 a RB 10 2 40.8236 - 4,1958 E.... 158 2100 MARCAl PAPER MI ,S,INC, 300 a RD 200

159 2100P ,PAPERMI ,S,INC.

4 40.8033 - 4.1311 BtnMn EImwaacI Pn 282 a RS 80

leo 2100P <ReAL PAPER MI S,INC.

5 40.8033 - 4.1311 s.o.n EImwaacI Park a RS 125

161 2100P RCAL PAPER MILLS, INC.

1 40.8033 -74.1311 BtnMn EImwaod Park 30e G RS 150

162 2100P MARCAl PAPER MI(lS, INC.

3 40.9033 :74.13fl Bergen EImwaod Park 325 G RS 250

163 ~!OOP MARCAL PAPER MILLS, INC.

2 40.9033 -14.1311 B«atn Em-ctPlrk 330 GTRS 2110

i64 2106P JERSEY PlASTIC MOLDERS, INC.

6 40.9033 ·74.1311 EMra.,. Elmwood Park GTRS 300 2 40.7169 -7<4.222" E,,..

-•

165 --J!'UP PFAFF TOOL & MANUFACTURING CO. lMngton 330 GTRB 320

... 166 2141P PFAFF TOOL & MANUFACTURING CO. 3

2 40.7618 -74.1347 Hudson KIlIImv 740 GTRB UO

-

.:a- 167 2141P PFAFF TOOL & MANUFACTURING CO.

40.7678 ·74.135 Hudson Kumy 550 GTRB 155

-+ 168 214ip PFAFF TOOL & MANUFACTURING CO.

1 40.7678 -14.1344 Hudson Kumv 590 GTRB 175

169 2161P

4 40.7878 -74.135 Hudson Kumy 333 GTRB

170 2187P BLOOMFIELD, TOWN OF

BLOOMFIELD, TOWN OF 2 40.7&42 ·74.1992 ElM)( BIoomIItId 400 GYRB 130

111 2167P BLOOMFIELD, TOWN OF

2 40.7&042 -74.1992 E... IC 400 GlRO 130

172 2167P BLOOMFIELD, TOWN OF

1 40.7&4-4 -74.1992 E'HIC 478 GYRO 160

113 21&4P MOUNTAINSIDE HOSPITAL

1 40.7&4-4 ·74.1992 Et_ BIoomfttId 748 GlRB 1110

17i -21Sip MOUNTAINSIDE HOSPITAL I

1 40."111 -74.2031 E'HJil Montclair 400 GYRS 2SO

175 2233P HOFFMANN-LAROCHE INC.

40,"125 ·74.205 E'HIC Montcl.1r 400 GlRB 350 20 40,8333 ·14.1553 E'HlI Nulliv 402 GTRS 100 ----Wi

'in -E~3P

-2233P

HOFFMANN·LAROCHE INC.

HOFFMANN-LAROCHE INC. 32 40.8375 ·74.1515 P.... 1e Clifton 650 GTRB 260

-..:> t78 2247P SETON COMPANY - LEATHER DIV.

37 40."328 ·74,1519 P.... 1e Clifton 120 GTRS 300

- ~ 119 ~~47P SETON COMPANY· LEATHER DIV.

3 40.7764 -74,1569 E'HIC HlWllrk 250 GlRB 75 8 40.7783 -74,1561 E'MX NlWllrk 400 GTRB 100 - 180

- ~- 'i8j

f-2247P

2247P SETON COMPANY -lEATHER DIV.

SElON COMPANY - lEATHER DIV. 2 40.7769 ·74.1569 e.HJC NlWllrk 300 GlRB 200

-

4 40.7758 ·74.1512 E.MlI NlWllrk 200 GTRB 200 ~ --182

183

~~47P

2259P

SETON COMPANY • LEATHER D1V.

MONTCLAIR GOLF CLUB

5 40.7753 ·74.1575 E.seIC NlWllrk -400 GTRS !500 2 40.8181 ·74,2486 E'HIC ,WntOranall 360 GlRB 25 -1&4 ~259P MONTCLAiR GOLF CLUB 3 40.8161 ·74.2488 E'HlI wast Orion<ie- 185 2259P MONTCLAIR GOLF CLUB 300 GTRB 125

t86 2259P MONTCLAIR GOLF CLUB

4 40.11236 ·14.2389 E,seIC Verona 500 GTRB ISO

167 ~lP BASF CORPORA JlON

1 40.8187 -74.2486 E.HlI WlstOra~ 300 GTRB 225 2 40,"7 -74.1458 Plasalc Clifton 600 GTRB-- 188 2262P -~18

169 2262P UPPER MONTCLAIR COUNTRY CLUB

UPPER MONTCLAIR COUNTRY CLUB 3 4O.848i ·14.1725 P"ule Clifton 300 GTR~~ 60

190

I 40.8-486 ·74.1736 P.,ulc Clifton 490 GTRB ---90

19i --J~~~

2262P I-UPPER MONTCLAIR COUNTRY CLUB

UPPER MONTClAIR COUNTRY CLUB 2 40.&426 ·74.17~2 E... lI Bloomfield 335 GTRB 132

192 2263P MOUNTAIN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB

4 40,""7 -74.1189 E'HlI Bloomfield 300 GIRB 200 2 40.8611 -74,3056 E'HlI Fllrfi.ld 275 GlRiiT 200

I

TIERRA-A-017438
Tablel~2

High-eapacity Bedrock WlIb In Vk:lnlty 01Tunnet

P.... 1c RIv., Flood Protection Project

FlgUr.r:n P.rmil UwMfafW.lI Local L8\llUOll lOngILUifi ~ Munleipailly oepCh ;:;:r~ Capacity Id.ntltlc,tlon Number (Company Of MunlclJMillty) Identlbtlon (ft. bgl) (gpm)

193

1~

~~6JP MOUNTAIN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 1 ~.8597 -7<4.2889 Ene. Wfttc.~ 2<40 GTRB 300 ~~7P GLEN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 3 ~.62~ . -7<4.19<41 E,sex Glen RIda' 400 GTRB 10 195 2267P GLEN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 2 ~./l236 -7<4.1958 E.sex Bloomfield 300 GTRB 200 196 ~~67P GLEN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 1 ~.6228 -7<4.1922 E ... x Bloomfield 353 GTRB 400

196

197 2267P GLEN RiDGE COUNTRY CLUB 1 <40.8228 -7<4.1922 E,sex Bloomfield 353 GTRB <400 2268P FOREST HILL FIELD CLUB 1 <40.7969 -7<4.1781 Essex Bloomfield 238 GTR8 60 199 2268P FOREST HILL FiELD CLUB 1 <40.7969

200 ~~.1781 E,sex Bloomfield 238 GTRB 60 ~~76P SCHERiNG PLOUGH lABS 2 <40.68<42 -7<4.2325 Union Union 578 GTRB 260 20i ~F6P SCHERINO PLOUGH LABS 3~~~ ·7<4.2325 Unlor1 Union ~ GTRB 500 202

---203 ~?97P Pr •• 1mess HI. Country Club <4 409<431 ·7<4.2<403 P .... 1e W.yne 135 GTRB 10

-~--204 2297P

2297P Pre.knnt HiD Country Club 2 409<458 ·7<42353 Pusalc W.yne 581 GTRB 100 Preaknets HID Country Club

-

1 409<483 -7<4.2344 Pusale Wayne 350 GTRB 105 ----

Pl .. knn. Hil Country Club 3 ~.9<4s8 ·7<4.2292 Pusale Wayne 3<42 GTRB

205 2297P

200 --~

2~~~~_ -PENCO OF LYNOHURSr INC. ----207 1 <40.8125 -7<4.1206 Befiian Lvndhurst 267 GTRB 110

---208 ~!~~ PENCO OF LYNOHURST INC. <4 408125 ·7<4.1208 Befaen Lyndhurst <410 GTRB ISO 23t3P =~~NCO OF LYNDHURST INC. 2~1I125 -7<4.12011 8«gen lyndhurst 313 GTRB 165 209 ~~np PENCO OF LYNOHURST INC. 5 40.8111 ·7<4.11111 Befaen Lyndhurst 352 GTRB 165 ------

- KofOW' TRADING CORPORATION 1 40.7517 ·7<4.1.... 2 Hudson K.. my 500 GTRB

~ 210 --.E~~ 210

-

:...-----2ii 2320P KofOW' TRADING CORPORATION 2 4O.7Si7 -7<4.1<439 Hudson Kaamy 700 GTRB 500 212 2J5.CP ESSEX COUNTY DEPT. OF PARKS 2 4O.n92 ·7<4.1861 E.... N_r1r <450 GTRB 180 -

;;----"213

~~5-4P ESSEX COUNTY DEPT. Of PARKS 1 o4O.n69 -74.176<4 E ... ·• N_rtl 200 GTRB 240 2i"4

~--~215 236~~ ESSEX COUNTY HOSPITAL CENTER 7 40.8556 -74.2<422 E'''l( Cedar Grow <435 GrRB 100 2363P ESSEX COUNTY HOSPITAL CENTER 10 40.11<492 -74.2<467 Es ... CedarGrOYl 524 GTRB 200 216 2363P ESSEX COUNTY HOSPITAL CENTER 9 <40.85-47 -74.2<436 E,sex CedarGrOYl 52<4 GTRB 200 2i7 2363P ESSEX COUNTY HOSPITAL CENTER 8 40.8508 -74.2<46<4 Essex CedarGrOYl 550 GTRB 3SO - ~ 2i8 2382P KARLSHAMNS USA. INC. NORTH WELL 40. 7<46t -7<4.1<439 Hudson K.. my 5&4 GTRB 500

- ... 2i9 2382P KARLSHAMNS USA. INC. SOUTHWELL <40.7<4904 -7<4.1<431 Hudson K.. my 600 GTRB 1000 220 2397P SANDY ALEXANDER IHC <4 40.8356 -7<4.1303 P.... lc Cllfton 400 GTRB 50 221 2397P SANDY ALEXANDER INC 1 ~.83<47 -7<4.1303 Passaic CllIton «lO GTRB 150 222 2397P SANDY ALEXANDER INe 2 <40.83<42 -7<4.1289 P .... 1c Clifton GTRB 223 2397P SANDY ALEXANDER INC 3 40.8344 ·7<4.12904 P .... 1c Clifton GrRB 22<4 2616P InAVIONICS DIVISION 1 <401125 -7<4.1389 E'Hx Nutley 500 GrRB 150 225 2616P III AVIONICS DIVISION 2 <40.825 ·7<4.1389 E.se. Nutley <450 GTRB 150 226 25isp III AVIONICS DIVISION 3 <40.825 ·7,U389 Ene. Nutl.y 500 GTRB 150 227 5081 Hackensack Wat., Company 3 Hilltop ~.9956 -7<4.2<4<4<4 Bergen Franldln ~kM 3JO GTRBS 250 228 5245 MONTCLAIR TOWN LORRAINE 3 040.11<431 ·7<4.2103 ES"K Montclair 300 GTROS <400 229 11850 WEST ORGANGE TOWNSHIP VITRO SITE 4O./l175 ·7<4.25042 ESHx Wftt OraOlfe 50 GTRBS 883

23i

230 10696W Becton DIckinson & Company 3 <41.0169 -7<4.2133 Beraen Franldln LakM 298 GTRES ~ 5151 FliViiili Lake Wat., <4 <40.9736 -7<4.3611 Morris KInnelon 90 GPe I 125

r

TIERRA-A-017439
Table 1-03

,

,

~

I I

population J

PrimaJy Water Secondary Water Percent of Population Served ]

Company Company Popolation by Residential

Hooked~up Wells"

I Morris County I

-I l

-I I

"

PequaDDOCk I 14.000 1Mtmicipa] (wells) l City of Newark 1 100 1 nODe 1

!

"

Lincoln Put I 10.720 l

~C ·-1 nODe 95 1 536

Riverdale 1,200 Mnnic:ipal (wells) none 100 nODe

Essez COllDlY

North Caldwell 12.000 Jersey City PVWC. Essex Fells 99 120

Cedar Grove 12.600 NJDWC PVWC 100 none

II Montclair I 38.000 1 NJDWC 1 Municipal (wells) 1 95 1.900

II

Glen Ridge I

7.600 GNJDWC 1

Mucicipal 1

100 nODe

(via Mootelair) (via Montclair)

"

II I

Nutley I

8.000 ]

PVWC7SS nODe 100 nODe

Newad: 25%

Bloomfield 45.061 City ofNewm nODe 100 nODe

BeDeviIle 34,213 City of Newar:t 100 ! none none

Newm 275.000 City of Newar:t DaDe 100 noDe

Passaic Count. ,

II I

52.000 I

98 1.040 I

Wayne NJDWC Municipal (wells)

II TotOWa I

11.000 PVWC nODe 100 nODe II

II West PalelSon I

10.982 PVWC Done I 100 r DODe II

I

Little Falls 12.000 Essex FeDs (wells) NJAWC 99.8 24 II

I

Oiftoa 70.000 PVWC nODe [ 100 r DODe II

I

Pompton Lakes 10.539 I Municipal (wells) I. nODe [ 100 r nODe

"

J

BeJ"ftD CoalltT l

[ r II

I

Lyndhurst 18.300 Jersey City l

nODe [ 100 r none II

Populatio~ Water Suppliers, and Residential Wells

Along Tunnel Alignment and Buffer

Passaic River Flood Protection Project

100 DODe

I

Kearny I

34.700 NJDWC none 100 nODe

East Newm 2.000 NJDWC DODe 100 Done

(via Kearny)

Harrisoo 13.425 PVWC none 100 nODe

Jersey City 228.537 Jersey City none 100 nODe

Note:

1bere are 935,667 people in the study area.

publioo data are &om 1990 census.

PVWC - Passaic Valley Water Commission

NJDWC - New Jersey Disaiet Water Commission

NJA WC - New Jersey American Water Company

a - Popolalion served by residential wells is estimated &om the percem populatioo not hooked up to the municipal water supply for

each community.

p- 52

EDIS/2-95/ENG/Pass:1ic. TB

TIERRA-A-017440
",

.,

TABLE 11·1

SUMMARY OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

PASSAIC RIVER FlOOI;) PROTECTION PROJECT

w:lRKSHAff

LOCATION

28K

2B-F

2C

6

2

3

-; 5

SPUR INLET

• 10 lEVEE

NCUE: BOlD INOlCATES WORK TO BE COW'lETED BY PARTIES OTHER T~ IT CORPORATION

1

PASI'LDllLS TIERRA-A-017441
LEGEND:

Jb

Jhm

Jt

Jp

Jf

JamT1

fl

t

/

-SOONTON F'ORMATlON

-HOOK WOUNTAIN BASAlT

-TOWACO f'l)RIIAnON

-PR£AKNESS BASALT

-FUMUE f'ORMATlON

-ORAHCE MOUNTAIN MSALT

-PASSNC f'ORMAnoH

-DELTAIC ~D ~NE FAN

-FUMAL OVER lJ\CUSTAIN£

- LACUSTltlN£

_ ...

~ ~=:.u. ~DL"l2'8cboiogu. bJc. t.!.J COU'CmA'1'I01I ~

FIGURE 1-07

GEOLOGIC MAP

OF THE TUNNEL ALIGNMENT

I-----,.~--::,..,......,.-t) 29 7 40- A 12

t..on

,;;

...

i

s

.,0

~:z .... c ...

..w ~ fi .... ...&.. ..... __ -.-'.;:::;.: ..... ~ ...

--

7000 7000 UOOO ~

u.s. ARIIY CORPS Of' ENGINEERS

IW.TIIolORE DISTRICT

I'DIRlJARY "95 o

H

-- -- -- 529740

TIERRA-A-017442
\I~mSURFACE WATER

LEGEND:

•

1------1,< 2K RESIDENTIAL WELLB t===== REMAINDER StJB1l'ACll: SUPPLY

fT1TITTlTTl ,< 5" RESmBNTIAL WELLS Ll.l..1.Jllll.l REMAINDER SUllFACB SUPPLY

mINTERNATIONAL

TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION

EDISON, NEW JERSEY

FIGURE 11 0

GROUNDWATER USAGE AND HIGH CAPACITY WELLS

IN THE VICINITY OF THE TUNNEL

Prepared For:

g.u.s.AmIl' COJIPS 07 aollflDS

....I3IIm.. Dl.!ftIC7

ruavl.U 1I0Il

REV DESCRJPTIDN DATE 8Y

ill!

TIERRA-A-017443
KEEGAN

LANDFILL

LEGEND:

• SHALLOW SOIL SAMPLE

~ SOIL GAS POINT

l& WELL

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

D HEAD

INERY

150 o 150 300

e i

SCALE OF FEET

RE' D€SCRIPTlllH DATE BY

FIGURE I II • 03

GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION SITE MAP

WORKSHAFT 28 (SHEET 1 OF 2: KEEGAN)

P""f~For; [=IJ USARMYCORP9or~~NEERS &, IAl.TI WORE DlSTIllCT

F..... "._

IIJINTERNATIONAL

TECHNOLOGY

CORPORA TION

EDISON. NEW JERSEY

,

i

_..,.I

".J~

TIERRA-A-017444
-- - Z-'P·fr

~ 11llT! Il'" !¥j] u.s. ARUV CORPS OF" E'NGINE[RS :. ~ I BAlTlI.lO~E DISTRICT

. F'EBRU.tRI' 1995

_co e.

529740-A 72

TIERRA-A-017445
LEGENp;

~Ot nu.

~ Oe E:STUAR1NE

~of nLL

; lIIIlIIIIIlIIII Opt PASSAIC TERRAe(

o

--

_... t'"

529740-A 17 f

TIERRA-A-017446

~Jlri.""" lie

Cl:5CRI'OON I Dl1£ Isr

FX;(Jf{f "'-J7

K£JIiNY IKXJ£l AREA

STJRfJCW. CfOUXif

_ ... Q..&A. .... Itll''''''

-p~~/. -~

I I

~\;"~~ u.s. ARUY CORPS or ENCINE:rR$

.. ~ BAlmAORE Olsn:tlcr

F'EBRUARI' , 995

O.S!'"
NORTtI

IT-2Bf -POOl IT-29K-PDOI

""''1<-23 In-,y-'wo,

I

SOUTH

250 -

-150 -

TUNNE

r-:--_-=-

LAYER-1

.4(iJ)

-550 -,..............."""""'--'-.....-.................. "'--f"""'"""""""~"'--~-"'-,.;..:,..~~':'O";';~~-..:..w..;,~;';'O;';'~..:...:.:.:..:~~~;.;.;..:.;,~:..+;...;..:.;,;:.;..;.::..;,;.:;,~:......:...::.:..:.~~

o 2000 4000 6000 8000

VERTICAL EXAGGERATION 16.67: 1

F7CURf N-J9

CE(XCX;Y ,wo M'Xfl CROSS SfCTTON,

KfN?Nf

[M! U.S. AAr.ff CORPS OF [IIIGlf~HRS

~ Q,l,LTlJ,fORE DIS1RICT

F£BRUAA'l' '995

10000

llGEt:W;

[-:-:-.:..,,;;,·,....·::.,..,:·.. -:<..,.,:~I PASSAIC FORMATION

(r) rRACTURED ROCKS

(U) UNFRACTURED ROCKS

....,......... ... 111'1"'"

.~~~:mn~ ~-=-- ~l~'1jj

1t.oI. f"""l'l" AS SHOWN 529740 ·-.-ciift·---- --~---.----- r;;:;-

529TIERRA-A-017447
NJDEP regulations. Well abandonment tasks are summarized in the

following table: I site Loc~tio. I Well ID I Well Type DJ.sposJ.tJ.on

./Pumping Well 1 B n Open rock I

Grouted borehole Workshaft 3

hole "-.-

Workshaft 3 P1~ot Borehole 4" Open rock Drilled out

(DC-I02) hole with obstructions and

multiport system grouted borehole

Workshaft 2 Pump1ng well 8" open rock Grouted borehole

hole

'"ork.haft 2 P1lot Borehole 4" Open rock Dr~lled out

(DC-8SA) hole with obstructions and

multiport system grouted borehole

Workshaft 2B P1lot Borehole 4" Open rock Drilled out

(Keegan) hole with obstructions and

multiport system grouted borehole

Workshaft 2B Overburden 2" PVC Grouted borehole

(Keegan) Monitoring Well .

Workshaft ZB Pump1ng Well 8" Open rock I

Grouted borehole

(Fiore) hole

Workshaft 2B P11.otBorehole 4" Open rock Dr1lled out

(Fiore) (DC-22) hole with obstructions and

multiport system grouted borehole

Workshaft 2B Overburden 2" PVC Grouted borehole

(Fiore) Monitoring Well

Workshaft 2C Pump1ng well 8" Open rock Grouted borehole

hole

Work~haft 2C P1.lotBorehole 4" Open rock Drilled out

hole with obstructions and

multiport system grouted borehole

1. Overburden Monitoring Wells

The overburden monitoring wells consisted of a 2-inch PVC

casing and screen assembly installed in a 6-inch diameter drilled

hole. The annulus of the borehole was filled with filter sand and

grout. The well at 2B-K was completed with an above-grade

protective casing and bollards. The well at 2B-F had a flushmounted protective cover. The wells were sealed by grouting the

PVC screen and riser using a tremie pipe.

The well abandonment and sealing of the overburden wells

proceeded as follows:

•

A grout tremie tube was lowered to the bottom of the

well. An NJDEP-approved grout was pumped from the bottom

of the well to the top. The tremie tube was withdrawn as

the well was filled with grout.

The stickup casing and bollards or flush-mounted cover

were removed. The wellhead was capped below grade using

concrete.

Site restoration consisted of spreading and smoothing the

gravel pad level with the existing grade. At Workshaft

•

•

GWFPROCS. DOC

TIERRA-A-017448
BORING NO. 1JOB NO. [)ll.TE 5/1./9"1 1 5/I 7/&',,( '1,.._ l1.K- ~, I 5~q7LfO REPORT ON -

GROUND ELEVATION

~

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION SHEET

, I Of ~i

<of" ,,_ ~;;l BASE

LOCATION PROJECT UNIT

S.T' ~~a::: ;U.l'~, ... 4'1'( '<rAil,..'! wr P.. «A,e.. R,,,,,,,,, r..-J) P'l ..,·p.,.,.....PL~,""" C IIEIt 8iAR.DfN

GROUNO'NATER OBSERVATIONS:

DURING DRIWNG SUBSEQUENT TO ORIWNG

...

DATE 511,,/9'1 I ..

DEPTH - L./ I bOc

CASING AT fA 1ft a:

w

TIME -

CD

~

ELAPSED TIME =' z

o uaUID INTRODUCED DURING DRIWNG AT FEET o NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED C NO READINGS )(

g

REMARKS, D...~IIe.r ':' b3 G,.",~~~,. S--..... ,+ !::>r-•• 1I.~ Q....;~e .....-4-i' .. ~J

w

f¥le~o~ :. 1'l1....c9. -r 01-1. r'r a:

) I , 8

GI'.olOc·, ..+ : Gt!'r"~ (.,il \~l.... ~ ) ::c T Corp., ~~ ,'... ", ,NT R.i;.. : Mo bile., g-go iLl

(;)

-<

EXPlORATION LOG

a:

0

rIII

III 0 SOIL AND ROCK SOIL SAMPUNG AND w

~

III Z ...J

a:~

z CLASSIFICATION· DESCRIPTION ROCK CORING DATA c..

z

0

=' ~

-' <

Q al 0-' e::: wal DEPTHS OF CHANGE CHARACTERISTICS III

r- Cl w 0

:i :I: Z cr~ ~

Z

I- UNUSUAL CONDITIONS

c.. B ~~

~ UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION w

w (;)

-' w <

w 0 1IlCl.. III

w

.J REMARKS

0

...L-, 3"

"

~: yc....:o ..... so;,l~ ( .~a".:'<. .o~l) ~~ ll~ 5~; .. hlo.. - ...,('1 s,~, 1o....

I..!.L 10 s...J.~ t\ ..~. ~.....P) ",;"d ...;U-,

rt t.o ..~rO ..... "0 IotT ~ lo.J h._PIC ,

II. ,Jo r(..J.,~ "0< 0", HN.....:~

... I~ c.....1,. trD.-e1 I ~\...~... f pr'c.\:.\ . .. v "'--""

B" '3"-

s....... c... o.\"o~c. s.-re (J 0 w

~

C"H",'H~) •

<J

l- .. .

II 9"

s.....(. ..\ ,,"bo,,~ 'c. ""p I! (vt'r~

..D..- :;",It r-tt.o~r~ ').

, ,0

.. ~

I

, "

O£(,lI,toJ1l. SOIL ..... / s,.....< ~'ll ~oo~ • !DW rtt ...,of'e .

- .~ se~\'~ :" 01

CJ

~

~

I~" 9' ~ .. 3- ..-<"" , ... ~O"'\ +.~~rt'rJ. ~

1..2- d!.I<-S·P(S\-Ill'l ~

, n

G ra..a

.~ ' :.0.h. ....+e D SA,..,~y .>'L 1"' II-

...

' ... r~ -'d ......~~.:.::-~ !.:2.:.s' - - -

SM ~ ... 3·;"c.~ !o~ t-l-7~..J ~

I~"

Sf"»"\

r~ , r 51 L..~.., $ArJ~ J.;\(- <;-PBI·I:l

• .J ~

~~C .s. .... ;,.. ..... ~j.

J

,-

.. -

I'()

:~

l'b"

.n

I~

,~

It

J. " >p_ .... S

1,,1

,-

,:)0 -

.......·J'OR...·~

IlfPLioCES EDITION Oiol£O JUNE 73 WHlOt IS OISOLETE

p.b'

TIERRA-A-017449
IJOBNO. J

.". -

i

r BORING NO.

DATE S /11/ Q"f

"1"-..J!~_pB'1 5':J.17"f 0 REPORT ON

GROUND ELEVAl10N MSL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION SHEET

MLW .J. OF :27 II

BASE

LOCATION PROJECT r UNIT

S,d ~'!!, &11.(..... '" Alr'£j f<~R,...y/JJ'J P"SUlt £..tIU h...o P,<mc.""cuJ Al.'J"f~ ~

I GROUNDWATER OBSERVAT1ONS'

-

1

=~.

_._- - -

DURING DRIWNG SUBSEQUENT TO DRIWNG

I! DATE " I

DEPTH

CASING AT cr

w

TIME

lD

~

ELAPSED TIME

::>

z

o UQUID INTRODUCED DURING DRILUNG AT FEET o NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED =:J NO READINGS x

g

I R.MAR""

w

",

a::

8

w

t:l I EXPLORATION LOG

<c::

0

~

III

en

I SOIL AND ROCK SOIL SAMPUNG AND w

~

0 ~

.....

a:§ CLASSIFICATION· DESCRIPTION ROCK CORING DATA 0-

~. ~

~ 0.... w' <

1&JG::l ~I DEPT~S OF CHANGE CHARACTERISTICS III

~

0 0

1 0

~

~ ~:H VI

z

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS

~

~~ -': UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION I&J

~

0

~

at' I&J

w 0A. I ..... REMARKS

•0 .L,o ,. C ....- 's1L.T'f .V.tJh ~o !;' s.-"\ ;Z" "

,po ..... .fZ0

~"" l:l- 15 G,..""(J ., .. ~.........""t.9 ) c.le..~ f"'\-c.. $P.rJ~ £ ~k=!

~

f". c;,r..AV'~L sf' I I

. ,

~T ~ -

i-71 .' 25' GL9 :J.II

~ ..... _ ~ u.

ll<r 11

- ~~. ~_,,;)h·~,..""t $11...."'-; v .. SA""'~ .... ... ")

~ $..... -r--

AI.

~

_.

...0

I 1\ I~"

do" 'PO ..... £3 lolL-

-

'jq

;)1.1

~.

..... Ei .".... _..

J~'"

G ....l ..l,.:..,.. ..... SftN,::>'-f Sl~- INI i}." )000" ~N"'" 5 Pf- ";(,0_

11L.

11

.

-

+-,.... t.t c;.\&.~ =,

J

F

.,.

,..

I~

~

Ii .. Cil I' Soro.", .

~

!5IJ I~

.-

) 0

~n ~ I

...... v ... OR .. ·~

o

'o .. aIlIO II!"LACES EOOllONDATEDJUNE 73 W"IO< IS 08SOlETE

TIERRA-A-017450
PROJECT UNIT

PA~';f,IL R,,,(1l.. h..1ID6 P~l"fc"""", rllllnCT'"

REPORT ON

GROUNDE~AnON MSL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

MLW

BASE

LOCATION _

$,..., ~ K ,6{It"f.l Avr- k UI/JO" /I)..J

I GROUNO'NATER OBSERVATIONS:

IJATE

CURING CRILUNG

~)HEET 3 OF

SUBSEQUENT TO CRILUNG

DATE

OEF'TH

CASING AT

TIME

ELAPSED TIME

o UQUID INTRODUCED DURING DRILUNG AT FEET 0 NO GROUNOV1IATER ENCOUNTERED 0 NO READINGS

c:

w

CD

~

::l

Z

)(

1--__-------------------------------1 g

REMARKS:

..0

g-.....,,~~~-~..... a- ~ArJj)~{ 51'-..":"" ,.)1 ~c.. ")"

S...., ~_ ~

....

.

c\..;:. \~ ..... ~ ( "tJ...."t;) .

'.

,g,."...-",~~~ ..b""~ .... "",-; -'u .~s. d" Sf>- . l

\~fI"~) ;

Sl"-"'" Vr: '>A /'It;;;, t ,SILo"¥ :"LA. \{ ~,.{l ---- (H:..I.'j (H.:_)

Gr-e-~ ) v&-"'ve~ Cu..If ~ C L.A 'f £ "f

SIL..."'" ..../ 1c."$1~ DC clk·,..("J.· 10""'0.......

off so.n~

10'UR ac IlfPL;f,CES EOOTl()ojDA1£0 JUNE 13 WHI01'S OlISOl.f1£

! C. I

I

TIERRA-A-017451
REPORT ON

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION SliEET

LOCATION ' PROJECT UNIT

<,..! ~B~ , 6';..&""" AvC. I<CAtl"'''J"'-~ P~SU.I~ ~II"''''F..coo PaoTF'1"ulf') funt.

GRQlJNMATER OBSERVATIONS:

DURING DRIWNG SUBSEQUENT TO DRIWNG

I

Ia:

I::::

I~

I~ ~--------------------=~

U)

w

-'

Q.

~

~

FEET 0 NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED S NO READINGS

SOIL AND ROCK

CLASSIFICATION. DESCRIPTION

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFiCATiON

z

o

~

w

DEPTHS OF CHANGE

1V"Oa,.-h_A ~ --.J..... r'J.:,,,-~ ,Jc. .. .,t!l.

I ,

CL.A. "f ~ Sl~-r ... / _ .... v~ _J se.. ....>

( ...~ ..I... .;...."lS"" ~I ~., Ip_A)

Va,,,,.. tArt O.S"· I , . .j,'..... ~ .. / .H.'A

.,~ r..... Jl lC ..... ~.

N.ANY'~tOR"·2~

1t(~lAc:rS EllITlON DAT'(O JVHE 73 WHICH IS OIlSOlfTE

o

z

w

Cl

W

..J

SOIL SAMPUNG AND

ROCK CORING DATA

CHARACTERISTICS

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS

REMARKS

c.! .1" :or"'''' .

1------1

TIERRA-A-017452
-

..

BORING NO. I JOB NO. DATE I

S IIC, ICl oJ I

1"'· n~wPCl"'! t:;d,q,"I0 REPORT ON ~ If/q~ -

GROUND ELEVATION MSL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION SHEET ~L J

MLW S' OF

BASE

I;OCA~~~ I PROJECT UNIT

~~...c.;'''''''04..."'[ fL~N>""" NJ

:>'T( DC!) "-~r;.~,-.,.. P"ttAll ... ~.v'C/1 ,:'-"'O{\ f', ..... 4 ('II"'" fQ..aJ'"

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS:

DURING DRILLING SUBSEQUENT TO DRILLING

DATE

DEPTH

CASING AT

lr ,

IU

TIME

ID

~

ELAPSED TIME

:;)

z

o UQUID INTRODUCED DURING DRILUNG AT FEET o NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED o NO READINGS )(

as

REMARKS:

uJ ,

lr' _ § i

Cl

<

EXPLORATION Lex:;

c::

0

~

0

III

III SOIL ANO ROCK SOIL SAMPUNG ANO W

~

III Z

-'

a:~

z CLASSIFICATION - DESCRIPTION ROCK CORING DATA Q..

z

:;)

~

Q

.... 0....lB CD '" WID DEPTHS OF CHANGE CHARACTERISTICS III

~ C> 0

'" ~ z zt~ ~

z

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS > ~ w

w c. B

:20

~

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION

w

....

0

w

lIlQ..

<a:

tIl ....

W"

REMA~

i'; -

.!!-

'i ('\oJ ..b........... I "l:.r ...e~ .t&J '" -..Sw~M-I. ............ f

:l" Sp" .....

.L- ;;;tJ"

~ Il...~ , ll.4 '1 C ) .. :C~) 1"\1

-

i

"

-- I.. I ~I

'1 .. c..~...< ...... ..... :.. c~' ~,.9 dr..cr •

-- le~s.< I a.rC, ~..:...) !

.. -

-

,,-

~ ~,.

..'!

~l" ~r-"'.(V ~

-- t.

--

--

-- I

...

,-

~.

I

d. I. 'o" 0<01- fZ)

I I t>~ I I~ :J*f"

r,1F

I I

rlr-F rCr-F

CCCtt J" !>p_ .... V ILLLhfu ~~,.

s

l-~U= r" -

sf

I I I III

! kl 1--

~Io.l., . .s~ ..._

R£'PlACfS fDiTlOf; DATEOJUNf 73 WHIOIIS OllSOl.fTE

TIERRA-A-017453
-

:

"

BORING NO. I JOB NO. DA.TE Gllq/4~

1''l'"-~6''- r~'" S.,,7#(0 REPORT ON

GROUND ELEVATlON

MLW

MSL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION SHEET , OF ~1

BASE

LOCATION PROJECT UNIT

.5 I'rc. ~BK, 6Ell,fllllt,"l, Kit"".,.,.,. Nj' PMrA'l. Z'V(,1 ~~ PnrrrfU"o..ft:l:J$h~

I GROUNDlNATER OBSERVATIONS:

DURING DRIWNG SUBSEQUEtlT TO DRIWNG

DA.TE

DEPTH

CASING AT a:

w

TIME

CD

~

ELAPSEDTlME

! ;:)

Z

o UQUID INTRODUCED DURING DRIWNG AT FEET o NO GROUND'/JATER ENCOUtlTERED :J NO READINGS )(

I B

I

REMARKS: II<

IX:

EXPLORATION LOG 0

~

en

tn ci SOIL AND ROCK SOIL SAMPUNG AND w

~

If' Z

..J

a: ~:

z CLASSIFICATlON ·OESCRIPTlON ROCK CORING DATA Q.

:l:

z :::I

~ Q

0 ...1

~

DEPTHS OF CHANGE CHARACTERISTICS

~ ~

Wall C

~

~lIj: z

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS

UNIFIED SOiL CLASSIFICATION w

~ B i1l1' i

0

l!l w

w tnQ, tn ~ REMARKS

rFI~l (\I1o/. -r-d· ~1>........... SII--r"'i VI=" SA,NI) 3·.",1.. f~~ ... Io.( •• ~~t I.~_!O,.

I RI"" :JII'I )

.. TR..... ~c.-pIL ,e.-~~:+O'

""/ +-'t.~ c...l .. ~ ·S....... ~Sk.~.5~ p~ 1- /4'$ €Y

---r,:;;,-- (1_- -10";') I~, '&

rcr~·Iq" s-.~ u ~,....

o. J;.,. e...--r-': ~

~f4.J ~......... (,'u) c.!>" ... ,.

__ 1. -I I- .. .

CCBi ,-I{"

:J" ~f"MY' e

~

,riF· CCiF

~

:l. ,. s,,_~

, " .. 'f~

i_o.t. ""'~c.. ~....J ·w

:rn==r -riF ~CiF

_.1 .1 ~ I

.1" Spa..... I~B

CI~· I~" +,...... t ~ s.r~"el

" I

...

--

--

I~n --

""" ......,..1:' - OR ....1S&

10 ...... 11 SO It£"~...cn EDITION DATED JUNE 73 WHICH IS OISOI.UE

TIERRA-A-017454
"

I BORING NO. I JOB NO. I

I)ATE ~/ it; /., .. ] <.('_ .. 12J1_PR~1 5:J"I14f(7 REPORT ON I ~~~~~~'ELEVAllON MSL. I

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION ~;HEET

ML.W 7 OF ~L.

BASE

L.OCATION tJ ~IPROJECT

UNIT

S,rt. ;;J,f!,Il.., &'!(,foJ An.. KUfl N,. J" f4\\A'o.- R...IfU r~..~fA-' ~'~.-J~"-J.

I GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS:

DURING DRILLING SUBSEQUENT TO DRILLING

...

DATE

DEPTH

CASING AT a::

w

11ME ..

Il)

~

ELAPSED 11ME

::l

z

o uaUID INTRODUCED DURING DRIWNG AT FEET o NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED ~ NO READINGS )(

l6

I

REMARKS:

w

a:: , § I

l:)

<

EXPLORATION L.OG

a::

0~ ,

(/)

(/) 0 SOIL AND ROCK SOIL SAMPUNG AND w

~

(/) Z

...J

a::~

z ClASSIFICATlON - DESCRIPTION ROCK CORING DATA 0..

z :J

:::l!

...J <

0 Il) O...J

wll) ~ DEPTHS OF CHANGE CHARACTERISTICS en

~

0

0

:x:: z ~~ ~. z

~ III UNUSUAL CONDITIONS

~

Q.. B

~o ~ UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION 0

III <a:: « III

w 0 II)Q.. II) .... REMARKS

~I~ fVI.,,8- - ....t~-b ..........'"

;2"

f"I-L.. :sA'" ~ ....J}

~poD'" . ® ICl lk~: 10

} 5"",

~O""" ~;Ij.. ""~ ~~tt. 1=' 'e'" vI! I

FBI I I

.

~ .

. ~,.. ,

rrl I~~J. (1110$. - roO· - ll.............. f S. "AF!; :....~ .. b(P"b j J" 5f'oi''' . 08 i

I I .1 IlnDI ... 10

. _ I"'-=t"'- "'"I I.+l-JI!. c..1"Jl t a:.. f,I""

~

'" ,J

I I

rrl 1-

IrCl 1-

CL] I~ ~ MoJ.-r-tt.L. - to r-g.....-. c..~A.'1('1 SILT" ~

~l

:J I, ~pC>'" G9 i I~J I~'/~ ~~"'~ > S-I.·...C .. :e-r +. r......'e.!

~-

,

~ (,,~P,Vt.L

i

,

f t=1 -~ I

I-H I~

Mo.l - ~ J - .b <-0.-0 ... 5/1- ,'{ F S4,..,!:. .....1 !.:." ~poo"" ·e I +N.I. ... t..lo.e- jc"~"~ .

I-in=

1_11~~I 1--

NA~"'.JLA""·2~

'0 ....I:! &c IlfPLACES EO/TlON OA TED JUNf 73 WHICH IS oeSO\.fT!

TIERRA-A-017455
-

:t

..

BORING NO. IJOB NO. DATE 5/ ,q /'1" - If,13/t1-f '['T"- "aK·P&~, S.2q 7..,0 REPORT ON

GROUND ELEVATION MSL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION SHEET

BASE

MLW ~ OF ~L

LOCATION PROJECT UNIT

P"~.sAI'"

~

S.r< ~gK Qr~i" M ~£.AA"". I"S ?~S.UII. ;Z. r~h Pb1"£c.n,N P4r(C.~ ....""".

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS:

DURING DRIWNG SUBSEQUENT TO DRILLING

DATE

DEPTH

CASING AT a:

w

TIM! ID

~

ElAPSED TlME ~

z

o UOUID INTRODUCED DURING DRIWNG AT FEET o NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED o NO READINGS )(

ii5

REMARKS:

w

DoVi I\ota.... c,..[...: .... I G~'.s. 0r-\ll.~ . L..,,~."'t,.rJ J ~i: 1'1' • ",,;J..l, £-(.1

a:

.-It# ~ 8

-10 be.~ :.... ,...c..l too,. •;..~ ..>u. f\.w. ~l.,..) ,..;~l"f-. Ul0

I EXPLORATION LOG

<

a:

0

...

ci III

CfJ SOIL AND ROCK SOIL SAMPUNG AND w

III Z oJ

~

CI:~

z CLASSIFICATION· DESCRIPTION ROCK CORING DATA 0-

~

:;) ~

ffi <

Om DEPTHS OF CHAHGE CHARACTERISTICS III

~

~ ~I 0

~ ~

~

z

UNUSUAL CONDInONS Ji J UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION w

~

~

0

~

w REMARKS

I

w 1IlQ. III oJ

CECI2,. f'\c,9. rd-br-o ..... j:: SCII.....D ~ CL.A;'1 ~'. ~

1"

~ ....

LJ ..J- ~ I

'-u~p. ';0_- pte" .."" ~ .. ",,"I(~l

-

..../ ...ec.,l. ...t f"t:R !""1lt.k.. .r..~e-...

0

l'''~ S%c.l & fo.S" ~.~,; I'lil 14/ ! '

~

(GL..AC./~L. "L.'- ) ..

1$4.......];:>'-r"t / LrT!)<, ,- ieiF L..o_ .

5

~

-

-08 ~

0" I'V 1-1' ' +0 1~8' J" ~--- -

0" ~

-[-C-'- "---- ~. ~_ .. He_pw~, ..o I...d:..

.. .... r----J A ~ 5' ~t- "el"~ h....D S.....~l !

~~

Ioov' ~'U .. -9 ;+ ....~j ".c.Jc. _/

,t .... ~ (!. 1'11'. .. ..~ ~+ ~':""Ir -

~

'if'" . St,g Dr;{tt'\~ Took. l I-I i

Over ,.,.~ (,Ore; !r-o-. 1'1.'-

I Ll hi )

6

1$0' ,"po" ..... L.,;c.,£. ... e

r- rR G. L"t.,. •• l. -rILL J...[c..~'f'~ ;~ ...", T:U. w.. I§ "'u ""('~ +" 1,,5' ('0' .~~

c._pt~,.,~ ""t-I),...I ...,.""01 to.

r .. ,,-- .!>~+ , a-..wP "''''/L ~,., I

t==1=8 6:>-pe.~ ..~ 51L .,-o;.'T"o,..J{ b(.J9,..Oo. k. l.c.8

.... t-a .....l:5 ~ /S9' .

(f,u.,·.... c..-....~,,)

I I: 1---1

l 'L~l J==J D:I=E3 R......... (.01"<.. 1 (.,.,- 15~··1, J

0-

qs., ... etA ....' .... d.O"l., ~a[)

.... "1'.1' 0A ....2So'o "

f"

sf;.

>[

'0 "'A~ 80 IIE~l .. c:ES EDoT1O"l OATED JUNE 73 WMlO4IS OBSOlETE

TIERRA-A-017456
~

I I

DO

..... -

1..n~AT1_ l-lI:t: T

'I

DIILLDIG LOG M.'''","

IL h10.l1ET I 'A I.... U_O~_ .. T lJOll Hr.- I)!'!l N""",M I

C.~•• :. {2:""" 1=', ..... J Do..+-.~.__ ()n~,...,,_ "'_'- --.. Lr~");Il..n.. r~'''~'''''·.......-vb" 1r>-,""U",,""'<'t'I'"' ~. C,e=UI

I rH I

·l.9'"w~~i\iit-fr,- K~AA~ 1J.J. .~ M~'Al;TIIfI&'Pt'~ro-",'f'-M _,~" ~-'~b"'G"'1l~T / ITL"on..L ob~L - I

l.) € 12. I)Jl ~ I,,, • 'L 'PO'YAL -0. 0'" OV..... , .......... ~ ...... i1"i'..- •• i:t

::":':~---"".!-r-r_., P,~-PR1'7l1 _-- ...... LU,. ... &.! J""I 0

r ..... ~VI'" 'v ..........,W&.TOT~._llW c_ •• aa

L ... to, _1~1.1IJII

OU~ M ~Fad",41 'WI. &LltVAT1___ 0 .AT ••

.A. ::J. ' • ""~ I

6. Dt".CT'OII 0", -oL1l '''';;t~1q

__ ..,Tll_& !C';"7,",.;:,"u i S Ii. l/ £):I .... TIC .... D··c...... ..................

n. &&'&VAT_ T_ 0' MOLt '.;l~1

.

T. TM'CJnIEU M _E •• V.OO 1St; ,

~'l •. TOTAL _& .&COVllWY PO" _.a ,

L """M llIII'~LD 1111'0ROCK '0;«:' te. _""IIIII~,=,T.!t.. T

•• TDT"'~ """01 M MOI.& 5 If) ,

''-------.t-:---+--+----------

to p\- % Sl Ltstol\t,

",~4u.,r.. - Bf:ddeci .

Tof 0 f;.DcJ'..

Dt::.J.U.d bhroLl~;"to /91 I

~,...,---_ ...""" .. ...,

_1M ....... ., ...........

•

TIERRA-A-017457
- - .. -

oan~"'TUNI I..U:

t

,~

DIILIJNG LOG 11''''_ .,.,.' , .. ~~Tl

".II:_a~"'''T 1>" l1u [;:;.~,.. ....... ~-=;;~fIJ! ~ frM-ed·"TN'. PfldlllL.4- ... - --.I

~ ...~;' ~ 1R'K-'K!u(rlv Al,t ,..~ I

'N'd,jl, u_ ..... X.u:T_IIIt". D~a."'TIOOO... a-IU

~ It'rrr' hU.IMe. / I.T.CoM oJb" L F- -io ,

II.. 't'OTAL MO.O. OV". IDI'."" •• D

!.. 01.......... a

t-- ::-:.:::.::,,--- ..... ~

I _D&..... ~U., ... II. ! J, c

.... TOTAL Mu-.DI COllI. ~.n ~•....lIOh~:..~M4~P.d, 'L IIL.IIY...,._ • __ .0.".,11. I' 000 ~ .-.s. ~ I.,.} -.. ins":,r..qq IC ...... ~. .... cc:T- O~_L.II • ........ .,11- ..11 ~_ .._ O_.... : -w.i qt; ao ...................

n.• u:"' ...,,_ .,_ o~ L ;:l~. .01.11:

II."_.US 0fII 0'11...... 00 /C;t:;' .. "O'T"" eo-tll: ..IICOV"" ~CIlIt_,.a "'1 ,

L _IOTIt _U.ID ..,.0.._ '7~S' •• _TutIllI O~,.Pll:eTOII ...\ \"'\'

L "OT.....OIl". 0fII ..,1.11 ~,nl ""'?S,c... "\

eL.... '~'e ...T'_ D~....Ta".u "eOllI: _IICIlIt .........

...... 1' It.eo... U._1.1I ...... .,1_ 0.....,• tDasau .. liIiiiiJ IIRT wo· ......... '---_ ---;........-..- 4 •

,

• • •

1?J.5.. tOp. fb Srlisiz.r.C, s~e ~ cd; IS~\!IOIl =-

-= /(,3', Ca.CD3 6. ...~vlLSM VV'S

1J1r, Run

~

-

Zo", of 4ltcf%2 Off X-N Il/'l\S~rk If .wd \fUllS ~~rtoI(.D.IO"

-

P-GD (~ tMto r",f( ...~Lct,J-C -IOer~~) -= Ftu·t.·1"' FA«s ~ ~ 0.-

ttlro --

U1 LAJ: of ~OoRf'6) -

~

·S - "-'U"O I iurc t--e.t:> Al:So .hsflMf WAre£. Lcr:.s-:. 75ffllu.-s - WtAt1ItA.1--V~ ou ~ .."- [rID"" /:uS. -f1,(~ 1I,)('l1" I...vN

- I0 ~ r2 CL.1Kt - ~

15~r""'~ 114-~r-ou T ~

- ~

-

- ~

.- ~

- ~

.... ,;: -- t

'1-

-

'"" - '"" f

----=- /l!L.

~ [/'B ..

=

-I E

1

~

13Ft-Act_vILe:; /s Ft. =-- IS.S:- -- 10R 'Yt- ':!L:t~fOl'\(., cc..IcM~ov~ 1/.u.J

~

~ /(X)fl' "- -- ~~r ~1b3'

- 5 ..,~rJrIl-O.6 ~&Jd~d",aD.L "- - V~ ~..d ::ll.W; a""y~ ...Lts RaD WftQ... t.rT:; f.ou .. d '&J CD~ \ ~

- "T' •. s:o. EO r. f"" Fl.·~T" UoUl5 ~S57D Z3~,J

"'l\fU. 'Ea.mL·~D ... t 0"'''''3''''' D+ i - fV_ - to--- Fa#lCtuu ~es C~c.oAtcJ SOI'Ie " C.o.tf ;' -

=- • ,. \A~ O..HtflU~ ~ Cl 0t;*-~ .lr.r)~ -1l6~h Q"f1"LA~dX;r

~

'~ ~t. HUld""l.t.~t-e.cs a.p "a. to

- .. - ~a.uc. ~UD"-.I\~I/VI ru+.

()aJ ~ Nl eCtAL

I/~~ U»I! .-

UA! /J!J ..lJJ~T!.~ k,~.s) - =- =

_.- IDR y/, CAI'~"U~ov;::r UOIoK :r.-~~.. 'cor., RVrJ 2J, ~~,-t ...(u';5Ft. -

- -

\I"'32~ .s~( ~d..Vd "tb-c,...CD3 RQD~ t

-

(",0 1o./-T?11. k.~) =- -y ~C"(,I\bo,.. w:.l::htAt \'V8~ f:D ~ 31fr.

- D'!{UJ ID~ % cL"a ~

- ~

-

- ~

-- - HtACtvLC fAte5 IOP.% ~

-

- C£I~rd, rou,~'" ~(lI'o\t w,clj., N2. -

- -

- f((ro~nt~'1 defc-~t.s -

-:: ._- ~

-

-=

.-

See Md. f~ =

:

=- ---

rq3 - - :

~

ENe FORM . n. '].I) ~ItOJ.e~

- -

1~'" f'W- "..".. • __ TIERRA A 017458
I

Dt",IAIC111

DIILLDIG LaG

~:;~ RIlU RoodP,.-J- ..,..,.,.- bu-.

a.U)C\~}:'", .../""r+"2"K 1<t'4UJf1 lJ.!,

a. .... IL.-B..l'ku

'j)'f!3.l.L.UlG /'.T. ('fl~ .

.... "D~I: NO. fA ...... _ .......... !

_ ... - i

L _"II 1ll'I1L.L.m lIlT •• _

• TOTAL. _"II M 1101,,1

ICC;'

.. DATa _1.& i'"Af_&i14 II !~/·~iJ

n.• L.liVA~ T_ .~ MOLl L. ;I) •

IL ... IVAT1 •• AT.. ... ~ . • ""'1\ I

o

• • •

_I--

=

=~.

-

-

:::::::

- .

- - .....

-t.

-~_.- ---- - -

-

-

~

-

t...

-

~

~

=.

-

-

-

~

-

~

~.~

~

f

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

=-

:

~

~

-~

~

~

~

~

E-

=- -

-

=-

:

~

TIERRA-A-017459

--

g fro.!ivus/IOFr-. --

Au.. ( "cLC. hAl (".:.CllCl.lxd wttJ./

IOr.~Hu:.l,:

Vl"S (,,'<J ;""ij.., IO;~~

Ada!<i CLAtr~ "",' 1Jz.

~r'f"&"",n(SI4 t1~ pc'",.ft

Nc wAfa:. Less,

r., r cI;A~ld A tiel:. RuN 7

b,rt ""~: rU1/U"~ Lu:lli.ll

I'D cl I.Q. '" or-d:: fCft1lU NcJ

~:t c~~oR:'J i.o l..c.r<a~P" r

_l~("; 1l>"'f(~~l\tJ~

rl1-l.o""~".

-

/

ENG FORM fA 1$. ...... _ .•••••• _ •• . _ _ .,.r
.t ....,..

1-"- ,... AU./i.nOOl 1~llnIJ.

DItILLlNGUIG ~j-, .. ""

I't,~' C:s~r- H~ f-r-cf.--b -r, fL'X'!£I-- .

•. "Ill _D T'f'N .. MT I.f" ~r. i}~"'."""'''' J

..... .....,

.... <I

I... ~L: d." I"T~K. !\tlof.JJ('" N.! Il. --M~UtlIl'" ~~C•.TICIOl- au~

a. DII~L." ..... Ci)1 I •.T, ' 'JL.-

I

~'fri fJ[Lr.«· I . ,Lcf_C IS. TOTaL. _0. 0" ov..... IIII"T~ ••

a ! -.. ...... -.. ••

0

411OL.!.• O.t ... ___ .... :

____ UT_ ..! J"7

0

----;

.... 'nIOTA&.• __ coal .., •••

a.1I IL...... ~ fe IL ... IlV/i..,,_ .. _ •• /i.T•• nOve ht -J' ..""'JI (l...~l.N L _IlCT_ DI' IIOL.Il • ..._T ...... IE !.uu il qII -+".Y~?)q i 5- - . -I....

~_TI._ O_L. ...D

.......... .,."T..

n ..... "A'- T_ .1' _IE 1:..:17- .T_ ...... OVIl• .., •• " ,t;5 •. T~""_Il •• covary • __ II. Q~ 'I ___ L."" IlfYO_ ~S~I ,. ....... T.... Il.I' .. ~ \ \\

It. YOTA&._II .. _IE l. I,.,'

CL.... 'I'IC/i..,,001 .. "'T"'/i.U 'ICORIl-- ........

L..II.IID • IECO¥- .......... a.IlVA.,,_ •

_II~

•

m .... ~

"T•

-.,

......---_.~ --"_'--'II •

u: . 10KY" CAU.~Lit)V5 S~A~ s"'""'!

-

IOcrt' ~N

I ~ut~I~H."'OsrL.r Hr:

=

~

A:. ~I"{P.5 Ot'lfo.t r. RQD: E.~"'"

-

-=Y!: . .' c . M4. LC

"I fnACtuQ' CDAW wrlJ"

oR% cALc.A~OlJS SI:l.l::sfa.Jc.~ :L'~ pl'Ulol lOP--. 0/,- c.~

~

~! I4S@ 1b.3'vlI~~ Ca~1I

-~

......c~~ blOt::e1l -~" ~J b~ . ~.-

'

- VII

S

~l'~T' (OJP.X :tl.n<, --,~'d

-- sHAJ. A""t"L.A(.l""~.A:- i.- ...

-

(.. V '1M' ~e ~ctLAi b.,b2t.

-

-= II U

l•

- 110 Eizr La:T -:= _. , -

-= - H.T: he4..rd JCU-AIt

~

~

,

-

- .., ..

--

-

:

-

.,,

:.Die E.+Uri. ~1rt2~

..'

,

~

-

~~

~~ 10

l '7w: CI4LOQfOJ; <;'1 Usto.1e lOOi., Ru.J /2CliACt.e.t2l'!{lf,lt-t. .\=

-=1--- ...,. RQD· 10 rf2ACt...e! hsu~ Cotl-trJ ~ tI·~p-I-.:

v'~~~E 22/'-213' BIrD qb/rJll~ loR%~

t

~

[

~"r_W,\::....; ~. £1-0/,111 2olol~ -- e. - ~""IItL4.II~"L.Atl.. cUsr· ~

--= fJO E4~C Le<:r . - t:: t"·. I12-'2'" ~ ~ - ~ ---

10~LCAU'OVS slC:tsb"" JOOYp ~ 2D Frodv(e~(to rf .---- Vf~~)(

- s,:w." ~ e I'd' RQD= v,,' ) ~

~'2-3'-'227.5 '~Du..-.. l.OlI'fQ~1l 75%

- ''-. ~ ,2.30 •- 233 I~ .2.DO ~..t - JT5~~ecd (~-0.1" eL,.(A~ (!(.Ju'ft

YU~~ l!n Ill.s -sl.IBrOW\d ro~.

.... ~F ho Losr c-- tit~·-.... i-

'2.Uf '- 22' '-vU ..b.c..ALcu~

-

..

~

- CCL.Lcs-tc:. r.:.LL&d ~,

~

-

-

~- .....: ~

-= -- v· ~ -

1--"'---

§

-I'-- -

-1

..:

~

---

:v.-

- -= .-d1-

1VIID0 4 lAIt

-

~r~

~

J ,J J ,

1.,2' I5R ~ C4.1c.A(eOJSS"-kfc,..~ -.... - =-

--......;....----

.-- ----- ..._-

- ~Ltl" 0.3 "J~£

::

=

~~ lIe.l't

f4

"

~i:t: e,,~s-sllb re-cJ .

-

EMG'0 ... Ie ..< _ _ '"3.'_ ",O,U:T TIERRA A 017460 - -

-
DIILL.IMG LOG

,_UT I~ I

lor;;" ~lt~n I

l~ .... ...,ATlOOO .. _0 _aTaa '" ')' _ ...... !

iL _al;T_ .~ _ ..I<

96.... ,.·CAL. C1'IIIC"ONIED ---- .... -- .... ,.. I------....... -::;,....I.:~ .......--"':O'....I..- ........_ _f

It. TIllICOUIDlCW ovt •• UIIDltOt It;c:'f

•. Ten'A'" clIAa .aCDVTttT ~CIOI_,It.. (;~ ~ ..... OIllA,.u•• D~ llll'~CTCIOI

~"'\.O... \ \-r

,ce-•• 0._ •• co,,", UN""!!

DI'I' ao.

• I

C.. .uaI~ICATOaoo o~ ~-IllATDI'AU

"

.R . ~I., --....... at

• --."._- I

I•

lf:

le-

~

-

-

lt--

"-

--"

=- ---

---

-

-t--

f=

.""""I-

~

lII-

~

'-

=-

f~

-

e-

-

=

=- -

-

--

-

tttt

.-

I-

-----

=-

;:-=lII-

~

I-

.-

-

-

:

-

-

TIERRA-A-017461

, frc.dv,....s {'CQttJ UJ~

loR% W1-6 N2.

fer('OMd-f'CHM .k~.l"t.s

l&~r f-t"1.0 ~ 25~t..lo--J~

K-- "",ud tub ~

234 '- 2.1f3 I

-,+---~

-

l..aOJECT
.. D.MI:CT.(lOO O' MOL.~

~" •• TtC&L. D'Mc", ... ao D ••. --'QIIio va.T.

o .,..,CIC_EU 0'" OV"t_.UftD ••

. DE"M.......m "",0._

CL."'~IC"'TI_~-Ol" ."TVI."U

4

. gl'il.1l t L UNse rJor t:e

s: c...:.lC .

f\l~ 2.' fmd:vn.cs /10 ft.,

~oI)

toR r; ~/'Il. '!L

LeN;: ;;:', r tr>wr:L

C'UJ" :

- '

- .

: i

2£'];. ,~;:::-;u-------:--;-;--;----+:---:---/-;;---1------,...~~~~

'11.. Tc:n-.L CO'III: .ECOvtJily It.. .-t_O:

......... T_1l o~'•• ~CT_

~ .... '\

I DR 1"CAWQ.e.ouS sdk~!

J.h c' L.cs i Lv.) 1..1 ~ t t.d

to "'vA Gt: I

TIERRA-A-017462
...... ~

JDI"''''. D.. LUMGLDC

I~;; D.uH. ~ .""A Prota:b,.J 'P(OQf'QJo'\

fL III ...., ~ J. -1:.1: K .K.t ItIl,J/Ci ,IIIt. • .....

"" I

'r .... _~

, ... ~OT"" MO.0" ev.... ' 0

.... OC... ~ .. UT .. •• .. I - . ,

..... "OL.",._O. ,.... .1 '----

:

.... ~' - .... 1

jeus":r,.ql( ~.:tr~rf

(,. • ~ .::l '

~"'.CT_O._. I

0 ............. 0 ........ 0 0••• - ...... T. 1-------I.--=-....:.;;......:...:.- ...... Y:::......!.:!~J....lo-4

ja. _"'M ... 1.1. 0 "_

t-. TOTAL. _ _Lot:

55'

• ~J 0 '

• •

CL... 'PIe ..~-,..DOI" ....,..I"'U

273-

'''; .,/'

=,......... -

-

-

-

--i--~

h:~rcL'f Ucrt N

loN~

:

-

iJ~ {:{UN f-:. Mvd

lUB

,

If tt?A::..LulU';,/3 p':',

Nc (rh.,{JJ

Frww~ 10 ~~" c~

tol'id "".rlJ" ea..lu-tl

CJ'4:'T"'1...}

TIERRA-A-017463
llIva&l_ MUT~ ...n_ I...ltn " DIILUMG LOG M~;.:nft

'tA~iT Rst£A. FLaJ fl , , rQ.ooi;4w1

•.• 11t _D T"n'W Of' "'I' it " I~....T'!frW ('VJ'1 IL .... _ ,_ 1"IIII.0II:'::l:J"

LOCATIOtl rC-;:;i+ _ ......1tk 16 . &IT ....., I

Wnll£..~' L· Jk.~" '1. -.uitfo"i:1' 0T-t..Tt 0# a......

So O"'LLf)..~ r,RNCfl L luLL.I~~ I L-r: Cot./) u. TOTA", .0. or OY...... .... T..-.1E1l : .... DI.T~ •• O

.. MOLl. .D. , ... ___ ._ ...... Ifh,.' _DCN ....... LU '1' ....... ! ,,1 ; _ ..- C

.... TO"'AL ._pe... _ ....

L ._It 1\CMIILLAri te r ta. .LIIYAnON __ D .AT." -)' ...~, I ()~ ~ rl1 rJ'\1 fl).

a. 1I1.I:=T._ M MO..E IJ I,"··T&Q. 't ~~~~rl/ t&. DATI: MIILI: i ~./,,-'f

Cl"_T'CAL Cl' ..C..'..... 0••. "'" ........

n •• ~" ...T_ TOO'OP OIOL. '.J.~'

.,. TOIle... as OP _ .... U .. D•• I'5 " •. TOTAL COIl••• COYli1t'l'fl. _11'0 qS

. 111:""01DIlILLItD ..".D ..oco: ~c:-e-I ....... ATUIIlI:DP I.... I:C.,.. "

•• TIIT"'L D.""N .P _LI: SIr, r ~,,\

CL.... 'P.CAT.DN OF OIA"'... ALS " CDII• • D. DII III'IIIA •• ,

.... VATt_ DII..,." L.aROID m-.o- .. RCD'" ... _L •

- _____ 1Ie1

IEII'I' 110. • ..--;.."....,........ . ~ . 4 •

f

li3 : ,'~. .

,',\:'.. , IO~% tALLUcovS ~C (ocr.... RUN 10 ftudvllt'S /&f( -

~Gb: ,q

= - lf2.re =-

, Vuat~ l~N) =

:

~LASh" ,J,-" -

~

-

~csH IoAif= -

-

w{f,c(.r /

-~

J:Lok ~f4+;~- ~tvll.! {AU fb()~'" =-

=

.

loR % cLA'~ (='~~(~

::

,,~~~: -

~

::-~ ,

-' t

-fJC ~CtuIl.N to ~B ~

- ~

-= .

29Q.. -

-~.~ :.o(..sJ

~rrc bl<rftl f Wffrd tif;; L f

T __ jJJ

- 10R % CJ. ilAtuJll; $1Us I:vNe 10V% ~vN I- No R!.b..«. N bo tvg =

=

2J:) .- .... -- - RQ1):: - & ~u--;t:

--

_tU' qq% HJ.. tnr'0'f~clVr CoRe --

e1{t'fT rat vve~/ ~ - : -

/

- -

- =-

I ""g~

~

~~~~-

-=-- - - -

: E

- - - IfJ

jD:' _ tOK~ U~('...!ou: $1Ltstowe.. {{)J~D RLIJJ II ~~~f.un~;7e~s ~i--- -

~

-

- ~b= 1.1 -,._-

- HJ (,S% v~i

-:: loR % cUtl oN.ft'Altuu: ~

CIl/ • .r -- "'":.. ff'{~s --

-= .... _- ~

::- vvetE .

-

-

- ~y., ).

- ~

- -

-= -

.1.-. fl\C

=- -

- -

- -

-

[

.- r>ewL

- I-

- \' \' lI- - ~ r--,\ - t.. ~~t \. ~

-i:.' Cnre bMI'!L ~~qr6g~

~

I- 311 t'- ,

-

'-- -

=

(lCJ. t- p-,< . -

:,'r -

- :

He F

TIERRA-A-017464
_ .....

: ~

37 : 0

----- ....-- ....~.1--------...... .:::..UJIl'.J-;"O"--:---I .....~..:..I. _ __t

"

•

••e- ...._. ~ "e_. __ ... _•• ...

UtT -. __ ,, __

• I

-+---"""" ItJl?* c:;,1e.4~Dtd

..silf S",I4cI~

r'~rliCJf/ C;f k,,f

{;/f,,' ~J4&Ii./rt

EMG '0111 1136 .... 7'

TIERRA-A-017465
...... 110" c.ILL"

D"..... fI1 ofcl"d ,:"'"

.......

-_.-.." ..... , 37

......J' ......, I

'.,. ...... a• ......,.-.1 i slll.lq-t

n.ILa""_ Y-. ." _I 6 . .2 ~ ,

1~S'

Sin'

OC~. 1III1.... 1ED IIITO .oc.

• "0" .... ""II 0," 1101.1:

,

-

--:

.-.--- ...-..

•• CO¥- _... ,.".. • ."

-:" -:'" --;---

1002 It/ _~/:.lfc.,Lvr4.r//tJ ~

RaP .2~ .h-Aclt/r.t"J" C.-fk;yf.

IOO~ ~""') (eJh,"k) /';&/

~ .f'elv.rAl"

t

~

~

~'.

r-

§

ENe; FOR .. 1836

..... '71 • ~t11lvIOUI ~OfTlo. •••• O-aLIET" 1~Q.l·C'I PRFPP

TIERRA-A-017466
DlV_

DRILLINGLS P............, c.. ~ • ..,u. ~ II.

.. ,,_~_.o.,....--- _., ,A

--- ;:t.r. ~1J(~PI1'P1

•.. TO........ 110.• " OVC" ____ UT..... I••~ ••• 37 ~ "-".~ •• D

.... ~.",..n__ 0 ."T." ......J' • M' I

L_~O"""O~I:

szr'-,.'C&L. C)" ..cL a .

iL DC",- .. ~L.D IIITO._

iI. TIn',"- _. M _L..

J ->S· .;;'n I

CL.... 'I'ICATI_ .,. "'T",.U

tD_t .,

........ ,...,----_ ...,

• •• 4 --; ...-

-~

-

-=

=

_ ••• _.'.-J/.1

=

-

lootlk Rv#

f(f)J; .2b

IOC'~ /.,.-)

I().I'~ c;,1c.-f/EDlVS

:S/#S~/Y'C

- ,1/./

- h"./

• 1/./

-O~I:r;T PR. F PP

TIERRA-A-017467
- -

,-

I..v....... - I"u

DIILLIMG LOG ,,,. p~,~ t2",~ ~ v. C.fI\JI\N 0'''''7~

'_~Q.I&CT

Q.,,~.( C. ~...o Pa-c..._....~~r€r-'"

•.• :r. _o~ _"T ~" I-IQ ~; ...... ~J P":U!io""" I"......T_ ,_ ,- ...... --..1

fL~AT-

-- Ks,

~s.1

WDP ..... "C .. ~s.K. -0 ....• , A"'f M .. " 1Y;r

II. .... v~............ B~,"TI...01 _,~ ~ 0fI:i~If<4A~~eT l3. I ,f,.:..,,- to,. 1:..,- Corp.r ..+.~ l'1ob~la -"~

t.l. TOT..., .e. 0" 0"1." f •• ",. ••• ; ............... 0

.. _OLoE MO. tA41 .... _ .............. ~ ,j) _DC. _at ._.. 3-,

0 -_.- ;LT- .J.&r<-P8 I

L .AIIl 0' .....~LItJIl ... TOTAL. ~ .. C ... -.a.a

n~..... fl1..C"'t.1.:"" '" _l.aVATI __ 0 •• '1''' ""'":J'., _,f

.. DI.IlCUOOIO~_~1l '.T"''''··/l _C---J~JT ••

~ •• 't'IC~ C)'.C"".&D

.. DAT._I i 5111.. 4" : l '"

DeL ......... ".

n.•",,,,A,,,,,, Te- •• DIM-I t...:l:J' ror. T.,CJI.as O~_1l ..... Db ,!OS' ... "tl't4 __ ._~" .OII _ .. t:t'1 .. II. DC"" IIRIU.a ""'0 __ J~S' ......... " ... 1 01' _~OII

•. TDT.~ DIl"" 01' _~Il Sin' ~~\''"T

IUVATIOII oerr C~""I'IC.TI_ 01' IUTa'AU "C_ll .._. ....... " ~IOI.O II' . Dllc.oo;.

a,.

...

-._- ~----_ __ 11-... .. • • ~ •

f

•

371.,.,- /Oj7t}i Uk,.,.r£DV.5' /~ ,(v,4/ - 7';:; -'fclC/r~.f/fo ,. ....

~

..$,' /,tf,t,...v£ to) e) 4/1CDAk/t:J"'~ =

~

~ 11~.k.,."",,::t1.{r,+ "~ ~

-

/c/!k C.4y ~

-= 'a'~p, .. -. be;) t- . = -

~

-

-= ::.- ,= p.f.-= =--

lOR¥!sM. -

::

- ~

-

-- : - - -

t: -

-=

: ~

~tf ~ ~k~r.!a<Jf I-. -= _.

- -

5,./IJ~H6 -

~

--

=- - -

=-

-=-

:

-

I~I.('- .= -

- fu,.( -If{;. '(},0/.N ,.:,/1wJ ~

:

dl'1 7dJ

~ -=-

~

-

-=

--::-

= l=

~ :

- ~

- ~ --:

- ~~

I ...::l I I I c

-

[

-

:

-= f

-

~

-

- --

-= -

: ~

f- -= ~ : ~

1,../<"': f:

~

E G FO."1836 N

..... 't r-a..IlCT PR. F PP

TIERRA-A-017468
.....- ••• -...onCMI C I"Cal~1 DIiLLIIIG LGC P,a.e...., ~ ';2, "V( ~,\I. f N I'tI\J Of'7,,~n

L",!,"~

Q,"f.c: C ".~6 Pa"""c, .....,; ~"f"£I:. ..

.... I._D~ ....... ~.,,., Q l-,;.....,...) P4n,~,\. ... ,.-..-...

_6-' Ks. tI'ls. r W."....M .. e.. ~&K -0... '.4". .-......./tIr ,&. ..... u·ac:T""' .... B~-_&TI- Of'""Uo ~DJI~7~CT +- 1:1" Cor~.,...,+..... !'l...I\;I. - " ~ ill.:..... II .. 't'DT&&.-0.•• O¥.... f .In- ••• !...... ~ ••• .. -~_.( .. _"' __ .I I>. _DU1 --.. .,._.. !

37 0

---- 1z'T- J.l~-P€ 1 ,.. TOTAL_a C... _ ... L ._. fW .'U,,1111

.... 11.... &Tt___ a •• 1'111 D ........... .... "'" j' .. .-, I

~_Ie:- ••_u ;"~i~:14 .. ~,~;i; ...... 1'._1.. Z--....~ CI"C~-.D .... ...-. .... '1". ~ '0(

l!ie'

n.• 1.&.... 1'_ 1'_ •• I0OI._ t...~~'

.1'______

&f'f J~S'

•. TCW~ _ •• &COVlr'I'T,.... __

"

"~_'LL"""'D_

TOTOL111"11 .. __ ........ T_IO···Trr

t:;,.... ~~\ ,

KLaV ....... ~ .. ,,.lC.Tt_ .. _Till ..... "COIIIII ... 011 ........ .- 1.••• 110 MI.""'" •• eo... ...~.-----_....

...,

• • •

1lO • -_.._- • . ,

•

/otf~ e;,/&-4/C"vr /!tiP

~/'#.s,f",N£ 3D t~

.;;"J+er...,jHt-tt-I- J../,.,;",

I ~

a-~r".-'\ I.~~J -

-

==-

~.-

7aR'J ;/041 ,-"

]

~

~

.... .

....- --

=

-

~

~

i

-~

~

-= ~

'-

-= r ---

~

:r

=

/(),f~ >~AL(. [J5"Z fUN -Iff".5r,'///A" ~ ~

~

- W@ f,~~1 ~ oMII£ 100% If= -= ~

=- ~

~

-= r--- ::--

5-4--f

- . =

=- -::

- t

r I - -Ji: r--m$ I I I c

1 ~

---J'lr1i ~

~

---..J InB ~

~

1-

-

",& r

~

~

-= ::-

=

s-AA ~

- " G tJ ~ 1 ':JP$.. -

~

",.t"":

~

fNG flO."1836 -""'OU, .11<"..... aO_~RTR "'D.a~ .... PRFPP 11OO~& -'Jf¥-. fla ." l61

TIERRA-A-017469
DIiLLnG UIC:

1 ..... i&tGIII

P-..u'L 1£,"'LA ~II. - C.~N~I\J I:::r , .....'"

.... 0.0 ..... .....-.......-.." "/" ~Q "t>; .... ,,"')

P4~s,ot,,1. Q....~( c: ._6 D/l"""c..,. ..... ~"r~'" I'" _.- ~- -----.- ...._-

~ l..~"'0" -- 1!J, 1'rI~1

WDP" .... ~.. O!&K 'O~, ,.).~ Ail ... " /'IJ" 11....... U."'lOTUIt.Ilt"Bu:-, ..TICIOl.. _IU,

.. DIII"""O ~~CT to,. !r ~p.r ...+..... f'lob:l. - " e.l g ,II''-G u.- 'to., .....-0.... CtV." I.·~... ! ...._.~ •• o

.. "0" •• 0, "... - .. - _. PIS~ __ .. _UT ...... !

31 0

--- !;L.T- ~l~- I ... ~ ..... __ COllI_.u ........ 01' """"'" IL ILKV""' __ ••• y.. D"...... IU' A ,I: ... -- =" ....... , I

.. D••• C'l.lOOl O'

~_""C&L.

'AO'"

OHltCL. •• D _... ..-.......

.... '1'.-.. i

.."--,;: Ii S 't-l ~-""'-I, IC .... J;:i~''f

n......V.~ '1'_0,. IIkI ~.~.2' IT. T.ICOI .... __ •• _"_D I~S' .. ~ ... _I II.COVW1t..."011_ .. ~" .. !L "...,,, OIII" ..m lIlT •• _ J~S'

Ie. TOT ... """ fill' _ .. I

.......,.'o-"~a'-f) h.."7"4,rY> t;;,,.,. .r:.. V.b':

.c...--

•__u

"....• c"_'''IC''T' ___ TIDUAI.I

..-...~. ELI:V.T._ DI:'O'T. tD .. _" - ------« ____tl"'-

•

4 •

f

• . •

rrl

/

f

: /?/odf h//;r~_ CI"N:<I.¥ I()LJ~ fu,J

- ~o - /r-"'lC£ -- '/. ok C.n Or-, -

(. 10 ~*)A-~i:'_ob~~) .s,z f:/k/ C-'ftp',t,Ef -= f~ ~...,.*)

=

5"/,L.f~£ /~ ~ Mod ~/

-

- s~/

:

--./A.r'/ /;" /J-,,/DOVE) /11§€JGtI/l.f"v,," ~~

~

~ f,/M1 krr~Z

--

- IIfee 6),/'5 v.,., S'~.Af

~ ~

-Jl.-/ f?J#'e 6"N"'/I? f.!~

i.t>Y/l,fUA? P4AJ-f -- -

-

,.-

- /

-

~

/17$§ '>1"..r1/- p..u,

:

-

---

- ;?/~@7£N ""./,( ~

~

::--- ~

-= -"'A~ Or/'-"iM!' fE-4n1' t

- ~

~-: He JrF-41

- :

- -

:

--/?74'l) 71:....S'UAf ,(, l; :

N,/f- • oU,J I' ;1 ,f"f/WI '/,_ k"" -

- " 1~/1r$;-#.r/r:JNe, I",~ tf.,..v

~

-

-n;.AO~· 6

r

/S"",,.,Sl"_r(~ R~J> .3..7 ..

-= :~~.. ~ ~...,,~ -

- iy,.J"" .;::,6/AIJ/vtp.J' IdO'" -

-

" .. " -

/"" ,4 ';' ~

~

-

,...,

...- -- g

- ;:::; cJ;V&~/..,J 'y't/,JUAr Sb+#rf C

-r-- ~

-

:

-

,.....--< - -

=

:

I I I t: 1~

/f1.1' P7,t";,., s.u-

~..

-= =

:

-= =-

- -

~

:

-::

: ~

/7l~ e71:.... SF-4;#/'

~ -

: J:

11'J4@ M~.-/i,/ ""c.I StY''''/!' kat'.;, ,If";

~

EH.~!~~.. 1a 36 .... v'_. _oon_ .... 0_....... MOLe -0.

O·~Z

,_OI.CT PRFPP I ~"'·f

TIERRA-A-017470
I&.«l.evaTl.. -_. _aTn ...... J' .. .....,I

.,. 11__ 011_ ',S'

~."...... .. ~C~'i~:~~

IL "''1'11_1.11 1 S 1/1. ,4-1 ~---"'-H' ,9«

n. IIUva~ ,.. O~ __ II &..:1. ~ I

•• TOTAl. _II _IICOVWRY ~- _.. ~ 'f , _"M _ ED ..,.. - J '5"s '

It-"",AL_ -u 51",'

.C_II __

_It~ ... _. .Y - • •

... _a -....,----- -_•

..-

,.

Cl._'~lCaTl_" ....,.•• AU m...... '

• •

-tIJ/.S' -

-

-

~

~=

:

=-::

-

-

---

:

- ~

~""""'"/aR% .s://..rr;,A£

~"&1/'Jl.Pf SEA..-,

=

k't>7jZffl~~

-/¥"~",.r_,fE-u,

-

-

: -_.

- ~- /

-= ---- dJ.I€' ?-f'

£h;A7!.

-=4.---1,# ~~.AnJri27.".t; r.1/'pPo ~/

_I-- - ,If/l -'/4' '

: /1l8~ ~-'.1T~ ('f'.~1

~-"""'1 ""iJi} ~~ 5eA,., {f?'l

IV"'''-: /hl.ok .. J'" n£.,./j", AJ,../

NAlIII;T PR. F F'P

~

~

-

=

=- -

-

=- ~

~

~

E""

~

=- -

::

f

:-

-

-

-

::-

=-

~

:: '_l.Il 110,.;181'- f'jz~ I

TIERRA-A-017471
,-

DO ........

DIILUMG LOG f'~ I '- t2., II~ t:..".

..

.....--_.,.

--

o

...... ZO~ 0-.......

D......." IY I;..,

.. D'.ZC:'UOOOO~_"&

1Zt'..... C .... 0......... ......,....."_'f.. ... DAft IIIIU I·';j;:ICI«~';:i;.,.

" ..... v..~ ,.__ o•• CIl.Z t..;2 ~ ,

•. "ft....OllIla .acetVWIl ... ~- _.. ~ "f , .. _"' .........mIItYO .oa

•• TOT A.. _"" lIP NO ...

-

.c•• _••

•• c:cno. _a

..... . -,

.-.. C....... ICAT'_ m.. ' cw "" ... AU

,..--;"-- ..._----

~'-

:

---,.,_-.,..1;- ..

-

--

-

-

-

I~O~.C'T PI'{ FPP

p.~

TIERRA-A-017472
-(fN J\I\J

,....,

.... ~.-.,.."... ..... , "'I'

... .-

""So'

4 __ ._TUtl .••

: 0

.T ""-_D ..

-- -~~ IilTD __

.. _AI. 1IP'r_ MOU

•

-=

:

-

I- -

-

-

-= ~

~

-.

... ,,110

"D" .6c)

.......... o·... ~

. )~·i

~

."

-=-

-=I. :.

-

:

6'" Q..

- R

.

-

- -

-

-

-

:

--

14'~"'-

.-1

IGS'

J~S'

Sin'

ENG '0Il111 1136 ...."

.......u

1IlocI _

_ --;u __

·"lfY1OUIIlDlTl_I ""If O_Llf'C

p.85"

TIERRA-A-017473
..",- DIILLING LOG P~I '- ;2,,,~ ~ \I.

L .... If .,. lMIL.L.U

T\a..... a. I;...,

M. TCWAL._ .. C_1f __ U

'L 1fL.IEY...n.. _au.D .... Tlfll "" ~. + "'" i

o

L DI"IfC'I_ ."_L.1f

~ __ 'I'.C~ O...e..... D

:.

:.

6 ,."'poT""""" ,J'M..,.,

~ .."'I' .r"- ff~

_. -"'1

-'-:1.._-"

9..1~l'u,.J

W4J> 11/1

IOD~

..

~

....

I-

---

--

-

-

~

~

~

....

....

--

---

-

-

-

-

.....-

....

---

-

-

-

-

----

----

-~-

-

-

-

-

--

10-

.-..

..

-- _-:-

--

----

I----

:=

1-.

1--

1-.

1-.

1-.

1-.

_.-

-,

-,

--

~

~

.... ....-

::

---

-

:

TIERRA-A-017474~"
00"_

DIILLING La ",","-1& .. K.~ t\.'II.

l&. __ "' .. _lMI __ ., •"'-. . "'··""' •• 0

---- iZr- J.tK~Pl)pl

: 0

.. DAft -.a In;;::I,., -- 17._'--v.~..... __ &.. ~.> I

1Z1'-..& C-~-.. ....- ."T.

Ie- .. ..,... _II,.LD .,,0 IIOCIt

It. 'rO'I'~ _Ii _-~.

e~_lrlC.Tl_ or _T ... _ m.. ,

• •• 4

-

,

11_

------., • ---;"... m¢

TIERRA-A-017475
r WELL CONSTRUCTION ~~==VESTEELCAPwmfLOCK

EXPANDABLE WATERTIGHT CAP

TOP OF CASING (T.O.C.) ElEVATION: __ -'l..:.....:..1:1_.:.......:.:..:...it...:... _

PROTECTIVE STEEL CASING DIAMETER: ...JB"--" _

6' GRAVEL PAD

TO 4'RADIUS GRADE ELEVATION: __ ;:;..;.........;;.,.__ ....;;... _

TYPE OF SURFACE SEAL:

OUTER CASING IOITYPE OF CASING: __ --=:;_-=---"'-;:;..:... _

UPPER BOREHOLE DIAMETER: --.:."..;:::1.:..,'_. _

DEPTH OF OUTER CASING: 50 . be 5:

TYPE OF BACKFILl.: Ce""e.~ 4- - be" +9"1 ..~? (l5: I) 3r" ....±

INTERMEDIATE DIAMETER OF BOREHOLE: .1'.- _

DEPTH TO TOP OF ROCK: ....:.-...... '-----:,:::-.:. _

4 II S fe~ I

INNER CASING INTO BEDROCK: tQ.f.....r cge.p.f{... = lL(b' ba

1

~~=- DIAMETER OF HOLE IN BEDROCK: ---,. ....:."_._.~ _

1---- DEPTH OF TRANSDUCEAlSAMPUNG PORT: __ ---'-"+-""'-- _

F::-t---- DEPTH OF P~CKER TOP: I ~ t{ I

1---- DEPTH OF 'TRANSDUCEAlSAMPUNG PORT: __ .....:....~ ~

t---- DEPTH OF PACKER TOP: I ! 7 •

1---- DEPTH OF PACKER TOP: '" /4:1.

1---- DEPTH OF TRANSDUCEAlSAMPLING PORT: __ --=:;;..=.""'__ _

t--- DEPTH OF PACKER TOP: m J40/ '

f~'f .~J.O'.•,..;.\~;...;-- DEPTH OF PACKER TOP: 1"\ / ... '\#..\'4< \\ DEPTH OF TRANSDUCEAlSAMPUNG PORT: __ -=-;;;.......< _

..f(.'\ >- /, DEPTH OF HOLE: S10 ' ";#'4.- '// \? \

-{/\'\ ~'\ ~/\

.,,/tJi

i

BOTTOM: /4('1'

17.2 I

BOTTOM: " S'

BOTTOM; ,../ ...

;J:J3'

BOTTOM: ~6f'(

I

BOTTOM: "'/""

.)!:7'

NOTE: NOT TO SCALE

PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT WELL PERMIT CATE: ----'--l:....:.....: _

~b?('171f

~/-Iq"

5/1",1"",

WELL NUMBER NJDEPE WELL PERMIT NUMBER: ----::.-=....;.....:....,;""",L. __

PROJECT NAME

PROJECT NUMBER 529740

------------

STAAT:

TIERRA-A-017476
... .-

.

....

!

..

WELL CONSTRUCTION FORM

_-- PROTECTIVE STEEL CAP WITH LOCK

_-- EXPANDABLE WATERTIGHT CAP

7 C'- .9 I

.....s I ._-- TOP OF CASING (T.O.C.) ELEVATION: __ --=...;:.......L....L- __ -:..:::....:...... _

~~ ..~

{, "

£.'i ;)I .. """5 I

PROTECTIVE STEEL CASING DIAMETER ---""'-- _

6· GRAVEL PAD

TO.' RADIUS GRADE ELEVATION:

TYPE OF SURFACE SEAL:

RISEA PIPE DIAMETER

TYPE OF RISEA PIPE:

.~ " BOREHOLE DIAMETER:

__ -- TYPE OF BACKFILl.; t..... I!..:(::.::4b~""--_-=::......:..:=-'-....!:-~~I:Z!l!....O::.-..!:~~~:...J

DEPTH TO TOP OF SEAl.: ,..;..I'J......:...)A...;..... _

TYPE OF SEAL: SQe '" bove

:

~._-- DEPTH TO TOP OF SANDPACK: --...l-!-~--'4~--------

TYPE OF SANDPACK _----:,....~o.:...• ....:.-_...!L!~~#-!-~!:..!... _

I

.,'

--- DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN: ---:..;,.{=---~b!.ia~s:----------

---TYPE OF SCREEN sJ..e~ ....!(" 4 0 ? 'Ie,

SLOT SIZ= X LENGTH 0 - 0;) 0·' .. 10 '

;) ,.

DEPTH OF WEll.

PVC BOiiOM CAP:

NOTE: NOT TO SCALE

WEU PERMIT DATE. ----!:~~....!.:l.---

;;J " 3 7 3 vb

C::.I ~ ,/0,'1'

I

WEll NUMBER: NJDEPE WEll PERMIT NUMBER --"'=~:::....1.......-!.....L.\::z.....-_

PROJECT NAME: PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT

PROJECT NUMBER: 529740 -----------

r-!:nI 4 o./ START

oS 1ft ~iK I '3,,.e'"

Ger('<3 Gj It jl .." P

A~ j

GEOLOGIST NAME: .liIL:.~~:u.L.l..U~...L------

NOTE. _
MONITOR WEU DEVELOPMENT

Sheel~ or I

SIte: PQ..EB? w"rk..s\Y,B- ~~'.(

~,...,."'" .,..;-:;

Wel ConslrUClion Details From Bon'ltJ Log:

Tolal depth (top 01casing): 51;" ~ I Screened interval: ,po'-> 10' ope'" h.ie.

Walerlosses dlJ'ing OODing: 230' -J,~tI) 2£5'J., FlJid Purging _--!I!IN:l!..!:.ll\""'+e..!::..!.' _

"'V ~ -, Height 0' _Ii casing (ground surface): .2~....""~:...._ _

Will DllsignatiDn 1:~ - U '"-P& ~ I Installation Date: fl1"'~l.:rWV'tS IC:Crl

..," Borehole diameter.

Well diameter. If " .L- _

Standing warer: Wen c:asin9'saeen:

(From Chart) Amulus (volumll x 30%): r1U-j/~A..;)...._ _

Dale and time 01development 0,00-1130

, 1 " ,. L

o..lC _ +T Metnod of development Pumpirlg rate: (punp;baler):

Deplt1(s) DI pumPing and elapsed lime at each depth: 50?'

Waler level: Belorll development: - __ .l.---Io<~'-- _

~AII.~.ls

Well depth (sou: :1le4f Before:

During: 30' ~s

51c' Aller: 5'0'

PhYSIcal appearance of water Iclarity. color. particulales. odor)

IniUal: - iY·"lw ....c,,+' sj('1i t...... ,.J.iti~: £'- ~ f-ITV\ , ce,O,~~% ,(\0' 0&. ...

During development ~ ; I+0 cf B :m c Ih. I" 10 - ~vQ N ,..... i "0 c.!2",,.. ~

Final: c.I"H', (?lor-Itl.\. 1.4(', Nj"'''\ an "R..o.-

Field analysIs' Initial F"na1 DlXlng (2)

Tme -'"...,"'"'.....tl-:lqt.::l!/'-----I~~_

Conductivity ~Sk....) 0.J~

pH 1.31

~/'~lr,~ 'Y30

0-(,(.

,.=lIS 'f'7/i., at Jo

o_\.,

" PC

1.55 1.,3

IOQ_Ca 'Qt..~

Quan~ty of water removedl.me lor removal (both inaemental and lotal)

'10 ~p"" :fv- 1 he-ro5

Coleet a l·pnt sample DllaSl water remO'Ved: _~~It"(....C..<..- _

Comments

MONITOR WELL DEVELOPMENT

Ge.r-,.~ Grlt.,,,,~~

1.e c.. Afk'!"C.+.'.o....

p. <'It)

TIERRA-A-017478
MONITOR WEll DEVELOPMENT ,

-'-

Wel OesgnaIOrl: Il'$tallaDa'l Dafe

• i

Wel ConsIruCCion Details From Boring Log:

2£1' Tolal depth (liClP of cuing): ~:1..

W.... IoaN~cNing: ,..IAL....--_ FiIid Purging ..,..JQ ~t.(. ""p~ kt~

"" .1'

Slanling .. -= W" casilgsc:reen:

(From a-u AmUu. (volme x 3O'K.):

Screened Jrllerval:

Height 01well casing (ground IUrlaca):

...

Dafe and lime of deYeloprMllt oR30

MeItlod 01dBwlopment (ptnlpbaier): ;-'''''tt =!Y&e'U'IOL~' P",,~P ~Lnlpr.g 1'318:

Dep~(s) 01PLnlping and eIapsad lime at each cIltpltl: _:::;~ ..../L..-./--'-f"'\)r.=.to.. ----:;~""--.I:lHw4""",,,:::::.L=-- --,-

"'" 4.sI ~ <. L.g..oJ .. -LA I)~

We/I dep\tllsounded) Belen: - __ ..lI!t..;IIIL- J, ;) , _ 51

Physical appearance of wafer (datiry. color. particUafes. odor):

lnilia/: v..S" ..rv" 'LICe'" H,lSo!Cc.;

Dvnng development GIt.t.i"""">t1 i 1\.,,< l' Ny r ~a I~ (0 'ij0 t1P'1ft.> i I -.'l 1'\=6f.f ~M If-r)

Final: G'r.t''''''\.f A....,. c.c.hK

Fek:l analysis: l.wliill DLnng (2)

Tme Qg~D c5'i 10 01-1>

Conductivity J I).. D 3bJo SS3°

pH '1.1 ~ 5_iJ ".)';

,..~~.)IT"'f .,..).00 IftC1)P9'I. ffIe'"" b1.7 f:;. i..

FnaI

'-II bO

fl.1.

QuanDty o' Woller remOWldltme tor removal (bolh naemental.and lolal)

~otO~"" I oJ Hp¢1

I

Colecl.a l·ponl sample 01laSI wafer rllmOll8d: _ ..../ _

Comments:

MONITOR WEll DEVELOPMENT

TIERRA-A-017479
::

BORING NO. I JOB NO. DATE " I ~i !r;'i "f-r_ ;'l81:.p O~a>' saC, ,'10 REPORT ON

GROUND ELfVATION

~

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION SHEET r

;).

I

OF

.+5.~~ BASE

LOCATION PROJECT UNIT

5 ,~( p.. e.~ g~~ A"'- I<f~ "':! PAt~~It. Q. .. ,M r_ Pu ...E c..... P) R ~ c.itf\rr ov£RG,loAt\.[)E: N

GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS:

DURING DRIWNG SUBSEQUENT TO DRIUING

DATE t,!i7 {q", - ,/~qJq"i - 7{.f. ('i{

DEPTH

I I

bes - 4 "11' bSs - ~.j" bt'

CASING AT ,Jj,t. - 1;1' ~. - l~' b8 f cr

...,

TIME - - - a)

::t

ELAPSEDTlME - - - - ~

z

o UQUID INTRODUCED DURING DRIWNG AT eJIA FEET o NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED o NO READINGS )(

2

REMARKS: ~3 0 L.." VOC\ + ,$ ....:........1" Or:II."b ' ~·,~:/_4U', foJ:J

w

'Or .lle- R,&. '= M .. l.i/e, B.-51 c:

§

6to1o""·0... ., (..~,....~ G;J/;I_ ...P I I-;- (..r,. J C;;i ...... , rJ~ I\1.t. fh.{I ,. ~ILo ....~$ ~(_ A "'Ct, (,.)

Cl

01(

EXPLORATION LOO

cr

0

t-

(,I)

(,I) (IlII SOIL AND ROCK SOIL SAMPUNG AND 1£1

~

...

a:'~

CLASSIFICATlON • DESCRIPTlON ROCK CORING DATA ll.

0

:E

z ..J «

0 ID 0'" wID DEPTHS OF CHANGE CHARACTERISTICS

~ Cl 0 '"

« z ... 1£1 Z

> ~ Z ll.ID W UNUSUAL CONDITIONS

w ll. in :EO UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFiCATiON Cl

..J W

l5 «cr ww 0 (,I)ll. -' REMARKS

.- £.!..:J,.. : C ;~ .. (!£ ...~ha.I. .....,.~~:;. .../ ~ ....~v VI)~l • !nr." ..~_ @ 5 ... ~U; •

-

':'11.. T"

~

-

~

.E..tk.l::- : t>ra ' \)1'\1 ....... roM c.e..,.St-I!L1> ~A"'E,- ;l .. 3-,~ s1:-- ... JtU -SH~I -¥'-~

~

I"" 4 SAAlpy S 'I.."T'" j for. OI..H ; c. ......s ..".9- ~'"" ~ .. HT/hJ 5__~ .J1 JIolC·.J.-O!'·.'"

L1 1-/. ..~.:.. I • b~ It- f./AIIJ ( r;;;ilA) ')

...L- C4>_vc·k Gi b.. ..c ~- 'l,i • -

10

I~"

~ .. j ....... c.l.. r~ rp.. ....l +... ~.;.

:D..- s......,;. - ~S-012I-ffbI(.

.;11 'C1 ~~,:,,,. ~r; 11:0'\6 ,.

... I~ '" U Q

;Jl{ " OI;"e.-bl0 sa1l.Al'" ...-I-'P Orz.6~1\J1c... ;J.;"r.~ spl: 4- • , (0<00- @0

1--1- J J

"

4 $0/1... -' Sit ..T'f CL.A"! -I ..It". r-(...-..c.; "t 01

1-

>-

V

-LI

IZ" S .......t, ....../ h. ~ ........ )

d -,'"e-l-. ~.".

(~

.. ~ loJ I

1'<:

-

,-

g'"O ...."':~L.... t,....O ~ .....c 9,~",.J.r-r k ·C.....a- I

..,

S ...~"'t-e...9 ) ,:-~c.. SAND Sp

~

-../ ~

c.f ",s

.10"

~ - ;"c.'- :>1'0°"" ~

~

-0-

-

-

-

"

~ ~-;"'(L. S('OO ..... (~)

.!..L- Ib"

To

""'''IYJORU.~

"

!lEl'V.CES EOlTlON DATED JI)H~ 7J WH01IS OISOlETE

p_'1z.

TIERRA-A-017480
'\

BORING NO. IJOB NO.

"1"1"- as.tc..-Dlolh 5:J.o,.,~o

DATE

REPORT ON

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION SHEET

OF

-

•c

DURING DRILLING SUBSEQUENT TO DRILUNG 1

MTE I

DEF'TH

CASING AT

I~

TIME

l:g

ElAPSED TIME

I~

o,UQUID INTRODUCED DU.RING DRILLING AT FEET o NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED 0 NO READINGS I~ I RE~R~

-- -

EXPLORATION LOG _. II

'"

I SOiL AND ROCK SOIL SAMPUNG AND LIJ

~

ell

oJ

a::~

CLASSIFICATION. DESCRIPTION ROCK CORING DATA ~

~'

:f

~ O~ c'

<:

~I DEPTHS OF CHANGE CHARACTERISTICS en

~

"

~~l

c

~

%: Z .' z

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS

t: B ~~!.. , UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION

w

~ ", Cl

!l ft' wW 1/)1:1. I

...J REMARKS

0

S,.-,n.& _r.M Yl,.,J~ - J ..... C(h Sp . -e9 .. ~[ ,~" ~

;;)•• ''''t-~ 'fl':>" "

'"I _:- Fr# G~l oft:, ~.r~$#.f>..- VF $AfJl;) ~ oJ/.7 ,

&0";"0 +u""',,,,,,~~ e ;2;).'

..

~

.

1111== rll1=: nrl-r-- ':1 1---

1111=:

rll1=:

rll1=:

rlll==

rll~: rll1=-

~

,

--.-

----

--.-

.....NY.I'()It ... ~

lO ..... 1l1O

TIERRA-A-017481
REFERENCE NO.9

TIERRA-A-017482
HTRW REPORT EXECOTrvE SUMMARY .

The USACE Baltimore District contracted IT Corporation to

perform intrusive field investigations and environm7nta~ records

searches in the proposed feature areas of the Passa~c R~ver .F~od

Protection Project. Proposed project features include main and

spur tunnels and associated inlets; temporary or permanent

workshafts for tunnel access; river-channel modifications; weirs;

levees; and floodwalls. Table ES-l contains a list of field

investigation locations and other identified HTRW sites, and

indicates the proposed feature or features with which each is

associated.

The purpose of the investigations was to estimate the

potential effects of existing hazardous, toxic, or radioactive

waste (HTRW) contamination on construction and operation of

project features and the potential effects of the project on

existing HTRW contamination. IT conducted field investigations

at the proposed tunnel inlet locations, at several proposed

workshaft locations, and at one proposed levee location. IT also

conducted an environmental records search to find existing HTRW

sites in the vicinity of each proposed project feature, including

the entire length of the main and spur tunnels.

Based on the data from the field investigation and the

environmental records search, IT performed qualitative analyses

of the risks that might be posed due to occupational exposure to

contaminated soil, groundwater, or surface water. The results of

these risk screening analyses were used to evaluate potential

occupational health risks during construction and operation of

each feature. The collected data were also compared to NJDEP and

USEPA criteria for contaminant levels in environmental media .. IT

compared the soils data to NJDEP criteria governing soil reuse

and disposal, and compared the groundwater data to NJDEP and

USEPA regulations for water-quality and effluent discharges to

surface water.

The comparisons to NJDEP and USEPA criteria allowed for an

evaluation of response alternatives. The alternatives addressed

whether soils to be excavated or groundwater to be pumped during

construction or operation would require special handling due to

the presence of contaminants. Special handling for soils

includes disposal or restrictions on reuse; special handling for

pumped groundwater includes removal of contaminants prior to its

discharge to surface water. Conservative cost estimates for

special handling, and for future investigations where current

data are incomplete, were developed for each feature.

The results of the risk screening analyses indicate that

only a few sites along the project alignment might pose health

risks to workers due to contaminant exposure. Occupational

XDl./-.a/.yt'20' .... ES-l

r' N1M. ,,1CrrnIIa::n on ltI$ ..... .-:Illy

USACE BlnIlO'll Dr=n::t ~ II....

oeMty at lie fNll'tIIDt Dy IT ~,

TIERRA-A-017483
exposure cancer risks and n~n-ca~c7r he~lth h~zard ~ndex val~es.

were estimated for several ~dent~f~ed s~tes, ~nclud~ng the :~elQinvestigation locations, in the project area. The calculated

values suggest that dermal-contact exposure to contaminants at

most worksites would pose low to negligible cancer and non-cancer

health risks in an occupational exposure scenario.

The only site where cancer risk estimates indicate

potentially serious occupational health concerns is the

Maxxus/Henkel/Diamond Alkali property, a known dioxin site on

Lister Avenue in Newark. At all other sites evaluated by IT, the

dermal exposure calculations for excess cancer risk from

contaminants were low to negligible.

Elevated concentrations of trichloroethene (TeE) were

detected in a deep groundwater zone at Workshaft 2B .. TeE would

volatilize from the groundwater into the air in ~he confined

space of the workshaft and tunnel segment excavation site.

Airborne concentrations of TCE in these confined space areas were

calculated using conservative groundwater inflow and low air

changes per hour assumptions. The calculated concentrations of

TeE in these confined spaces were estimated to be less than

2 ppm. As the OSHA PEL for TCE is 50 ppm, inhalation exposure to

TeE would not be a health concern at these excavation worksites.

Once the contaminant types, concentrations, and locations

were ascertained and compared with NJDEP and USEPA criteria, an

incremental cost estimate for special handling and further

investigation was formulated for each feature. The estimates

included costs for sampling and analysis, treatment, .

transportation, and disposal, as required. The incremental costs

for each feature were summarized to yield a total incremental

cost for the project. All the costs were based on conservative

assumptions, such as homogeneity of contamination throughout a

given site, so that the cost estimates were also conservative.

There are limitations to the completeness of the collected data

that .may have affected the selection of HTRW sites and t~e

subsequent cost estimates for avoidance or mitigation.

The evaluation of the data indicates that several features

may require additional field investigations to characterize

potential HTRW contamination. Several features are given high

priority because they require further investigation: Workshafts

2A, 2B, 2C, and 3; Pinch Brook Levee; Doremus Avenue, Kearny

Point, Lister Avenue, and Newark Bay Levee Systems; and Great

Piece Weir and Pequannock River Channel Modifications. The

recommended site-specific investigations must be performed to

fully assess the impact of contamination. These focused

investigations would provide the basis for more accurate

estimation of the costs that would be specifically attributable

to the presence of contamination at each feature location.

ZDIS/IXa/.yO'20J~.KS ES-2

Nelle· ~G'I Inpepe- r.-l by

USAC£8IImI:n DiIrc:t ",--IIlIN

0eMry fA hi!nil ~ by IT QlrI:rnII:n

TIERRA-A-017484
In conjunction with the HTRW investigation, ~T conducted ~

hydrogeologic inv7stigation along ~he pr~pos7d a~~gnrnen~ for :ne

floodwater divers10n tunnel. The ~nvest~gat10n 1ncludea f1ela

studies at proposed workshaft locations 2B, 2C, 2, and 3;

evaluation of local and regional hydrogeology; and groundwaterflow modeling. The modeling study evaluated the interconnectiQn

of overburden materials with bedrock aquifers and the potential

for interference with existing groundwater contamination, among

othEM:'things.

Shallow groundwater contamination, including separate-phase

contaminants in some cases, has been reported at several ~~own

HTRW sites along the tunnel alignment. The separate-phase

contaminants were not reported for any proposed work locations.

The USACE will provide engineering controls during construction

so that inflow of shallow groundwater into work locations will be

negligible. Also, the groundwater models indicate that there

will be negligible or no induced drawdown effects in overburden

groundwater during tunnel construction and operation. Therefore,

existing shallow groundwater contamination is not expected to

affect the project and the project is not expected to affect the

existing contamination, unless the contamination has already

migrated downward into bedrock.

Known groundwater contamination discovered near Workshaft 2B

exists in a highly permeable zone along a bedding plane fracture

in the soft bedrock. The tunnel and workshaft are expected to

intersect this zone. Groundwater that enters the workshaft or

tunnel from the zone will have to be treated prior to discharge

to a surface-water body. The full impact of the project on this

zone cannot be estimated because the source of contamination is

unknown. All other shaft and inlet locations at which IT

collected groundwater samples showed minor or no contamination.

In summary, there are proposed project features that may

impact or be impacted by the presence of HTRW. The potential for

occupational exposure to contaminants at Lister Avenue Levee

System, Workshaft 2B, and Tunnel Segment 2B-2C will necessitate

additional safety measures. Additional project costs for

disposal of contaminated soil may be incurred at Workshafts 2B

and 4; Newark Bay Tunnel Outlet; Rockaway, Lister Avenue, Doremus

Avenue, and Kearny Point Levee Systems; and New Jersey Turnoike

Levee. Additional costs for treatment of groundwater at and near

Workshaft 2B are expected. There are also several sites where

further investigation is required. Table ES-l presents a summary

of the investigations conducted to identify HTRW at each feature

location, using environmental records search (ERS) or intrusive

field investigations (FI) data. Table ES-2 presents a summary of

estimates of HTRW impacts on feature construction and future

investigation costs.

KDxsf..afayOt20t .... ES-3

Nelle Wc:t1Mla1 cnltvs pe;l8 - ~ r1f

USl.Cf 8eIbmcn DICa a.-.JlWlI" Ire

deMIry d IhIl fNIl'1lErt l7I' IT ~

TIERRA-A-017485
Table ES - 1.

INVESTIGATION SUMMARY

Passaic River Local Flood Protection Project

I FEATURE NAME I~ ....;:;.;..:,..=~~ SITE NAME I ERS 1._£1

Pompton Inlet

Pompton Inlet Field Investigation

Mobil GaslWayne Towing

R&S strauss

SGL Printed Circuits

Wayne Interim Storage Site

Spur Tunnel Inlet "

Spur Tunnel Inlet Field Investigation

Finns Mobile Homes

Workshaft No.2 Site

Workshaft NO.2 Site Field Investigation

Montclair College

Shell Oil Co. (Shell service Station 449)

Workshaft No.2A Site

Wor1<shaft No.2ASite Field Investigation

Work Site 2B

Work Site 28 - Fiore Field Investigation

--:;> Work Site 28 • Keeaan Field Investigation

Campbell Foundry Co.

Diamond Head Oil Refinery

Drew Chemical Corp.

Frank's Auto Electric

Guignon & Greene Co.

G&S Motor Equipment Company Inc.

Interstate Metals

Kearny Smelting & Refining Co.

Keegan Landfill

Kenney Steel Treating Corp.

Kleer Kast Inc.

Theobold Industries I 8&L Oil Corp. I National Freight

T.J. McDennott Trans. Co.

Warner Manufacturing Company

West Hudson Lumber Company

Wilkata Packaging Corp.

Workshaft No.2C Site

Workshaft NO.2C Site Field Investigation

Western Electric Co., Inc.lAT&T Technologies

Page 1 of6

p-4

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ves

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

No

NaIl: ~ en" JIIIPII--.-:lby

. USACE IlIiImu'e o.sn:t .-.. II"

~d'" WI ~ byIT Capnacn

TIERRA-A-017486
Table ES·1

INVESTIGA nON SUMMARY

Passaic River Local Flood Protection Project

FEATURE NAME SITE NAME , EP.s-L FI I

Workshaft No.3 Slit

Workshaft No.3 Site FJeld Investigation Ves Ves

FenulmatlclUniversal Manufacturing Inc. Ves No

Norton Chemplast Ves No

Wayne OPW Garage Ves No

Workshqft No.4 Silt ,p.

Workshaft NO.4 Site Field Investigation. Ves Ves

Amoco Service Station Ves No

Contract Packaging Corp. Ves No

Noeller Industries Ves No

Wayne Bus Maint. Facility Ves No

TunneISe"ntntPI-4

CBA IndustriesJlakeland Coldtype Ves No

TunntlSt~ent~2

A-Bet-A Industries Ves No

Cligo Ves No

Glandors Knitting Mills! Capital Knitting Realty Co. Ves No

Hilltop Apartments Ves No

Joseph Baleln Yes No

Mobil Service Station Yes No

Plaza Carwash Ves No

Uddeholm CorpJPitrnan Co. Ves No

Tunnel Section 2-2A

ABB Lummus Crest Ves No

Brookdale Northbound Service Area Ves No

Brookdale Southbound Service Area Ves No

Getty I Exxon Ves No

Merrick Corp. Ves No

Mobil Ves No

Mobil Oil Corp. No. 15 Ves No

Nutley Municipal Garage Ves No

Shell Oil Co. Ves No ShuRon Toiletries Ves No

FISUMARV.WK401106195 Page 2 of 6

r

5

TIERRA-A-017487
Table ES - ]

INVESTIGATION SUMMARY

Passaic River Local Flood Protection Project

FEATURE NAME SITE NAME

Tunnel Section 2A-2B

FISUMARY.WK401/06/95

Alliance Color & Chemical Co.

Amtrack Access Rd.

Amtruck 1Hildermann Ind.

Balel Service Station & Repair

Belleville Pike

Breyers Warehouse

Browning-Ferris Ind.

Chester Jackson Tank Lines

Conrail Stulman Property

Diamond Shamrock Corp.

Enon No. 30190

Ferry Wholesalers

Frederick Gumm Chemical Company

Frey Industries 1 Jobar Industries

Hackensack RVR Access Road

H&G Industries Inc.

Kearny Drum Dumps

Mass & Waldstein Co.

Occidental Chemical Corp.

Roanoke Avenue

Seton Co.

Shell Oil Co.

Tress Chem Co.

Wallace and Tiernan, Inc.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Page 3 of 6

f·b

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

TIERRA-A-017488
Table ES - I

INVESTIGATION SUMMARY

Passaic River Local Flood Protection Project

FEATURE NAME SITE NAME ERS-- FI

Tunnel Section 2B·2C

ABF Trucking

Arkansas Chemical Co.lSun Chemical Co.lGignard Chemical Co.

Ashland Chem Company

Bayonne Barrel & Drum Corp.

Brady Iron & Metal Company

Caisson #1 & Electrical Duct Building

Capital City Products Company

Cellofilm Corp.

Chapel Avenue

Continental Oil I Pitt-Canso I Chemical Co.

Degan Oil

Droyer's Point

Duralac

Fairmont Chemical Co. Inc.

Hayes Park East I Municipal Swimming Pool

Kearny Power' & Light.

Uberty Harbor North

Linden East

Lockwood St.

Marion Junction - NJDOT

MSLA 1 -A LF

Multiplex Cinema

NE Interceptor 3

Newark Box Board Company

NJ Transit

NJ Turnpike - Greenville

NJTPK Kearny

Old Dominion

Posnak & Turkish, Inc.

Printers Service

paM Sanitation

SCA Chemical Services Inc.lChem Waste Management

V. Ottilio and Sons Landfill

Newark Bay Tunnel Outlet

Tunnel Outlet

Great Piece Weir Channel Modification

Finns Mobile Homes

Wanaque, Ramapo and Pequannock River Channel Modification

Alvino's Service Station

Cooper Oil

K&M Machine Works

FISUMARY.WK401/06/95 Page 4 of 6

p.1

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Ves No

Ves No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Ves No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Ves No

TIERRA-A-017489
T. INTRODUCTION

The Passaic River Flood Protection Project is a proposed

major construction project designed to alleviate flooding

conditions along the Pompton and Passaic Rivers in northeaster~_

New Jersey. The location of the project features is shown in

Figure 1-1.

The major element of flood protection project is a tunnel

system that would conduct floodwaters from two tunnel inlets in

Wayne Township, Passaic County, to a tunnel outlet terminating in

Newark Bay. The main floodwater diversion tunnel is a 40-foot

diameter, 20.1-mile long structure. The inlet basin to the main

tunnel, Pompton Inlet, is located at the upper reach of the

Pompton River at the confluence of the Ramapo and Pequannock

Rivers. A second tunnel inlet, the Spur Tunnel Inlet, located at

the confluence of the Pompton and Passaic Rivers, joins the main

tunnel by a 1.2-mile long, 20-foot diameter spur tunnel.

In addition to the tunnels, the flood protection project

includes river channel modifications, weirs, and an extensive

system of levees and floodwalls. Channel modifications for

diversion of floodwaters to the two tunnel inlet basins are

proposed on the Ramapo, Pequannock, Wanaque, and Passaic Rivers.

Levees and floodwalls would be constructed along the Pequannock,

Pompton, Ramapo, and Wanaque Rivers above the Pompton Inlet. A

series of levees extending into Morris County would provide flood

protection along sections of the Rockaway River, Deepavaal Brook,

Pinch Brook, and Passaic River. Lastly, a series of six levee

and floodwall features would be constructed along the lower

Passaic River and in the Kearny Point area to provide SOD-year

protection against hurricane and tidal surge flooding of

industrial areas in the greater Newark area.

A portion of the selected tunnel alignment and many of the

associated features of the project are located in heavily

industrialized sections of northeastern New Jersey. Construction

activities present the potential for encountering significant

hazardous, toxic, and radioactive waste (HTRW) contamination in

soil, surface water, and groundwater. IT Corporation (IT) was

contracted to conduct a multi-task HTRW investigation to address

the presence of HTRW materials as outlined below. Integration of

the findings of the various tasks was required to meet the

objectives of the study.

Encountering HTRW materials in environmental media during

construction activities poses a number of concerns that should be

examined in the design and feasibility phases of this project.

The presence of HTRW materials may present environmental and

occupational health and safety concerns at worksites. If HTRW

materials are present, engineering approaches would be required

to mitigate or rernediate worksites prior to or during

1-1

TIERRA-A-017490
construction of project features. Depending on the type and

magnitude of HTRW materials present, various enginee=~ng

approaches and their associated costs are examined to choose

between the alternatives of avoidance, disposal, or treatment 0:

contaminated soil and groundwater encountered during cons~ruc~i~~

activities. In addition, construction activities and/or

operation of the flood control tunnel may impact HTRW

conta~inants via flux changes in groundwater in the vicinity of

the tunnel.

The HTRW investigation had five basic tasks:

• Intrusive field investigations at selected features to

collect soil and groundwater samples for analytical

testing;

• Collection of data to support groundwater models

predicting the effect of the constructed tunnel on

local and regional groundwater flows;

• Environmental records search and priority ranking

methodology to identify HTRW sites that may impact

construction .activities and sites where contaminants

may be influenced by construction activities;

• Qualitative risk screening methods to estimate

occupational health risks at the various project

features; and

• HTRW mitigation/remediation engineering alternatives

and cost estimates for each of these alternatives by

project feature.

The objectives of the field investigation were to determine

the presence or absence of HTRW materials in soil and groundwater

at se~ected features and to collect groundwater data (e.g.,

pumping and straddle-packer tests) to support the groundwater

modeling task. The intrusive field investigation involved

collection of soil samples at Passaic Levee No. 10, at Workshafts

2B, 3, 4, and at the Pompton and Spur Tunnel Inlet locations.

Groundwater quality samples were collected at Workshafts 2, 2B,

2C, 3, and at both tunnel inlets. All collected samples

underwent a full suite of analytical tests to determine the

presence or absence of HTRW materials.

The environmental records search (ERS) employed ASTM

standard practice database searches and Freedom-of-InformationAct requests to regulatory agencies to supplement and build upon

the ERS previously conducted by Dames & Moore and Weston for the

study area. Based on available information, a HTRW site ranking

methodology was developed to focus the qualitative human health

risk screening protocol and remediation engineering cost

1-2

p.Ci

TIERRA-A-017491
estimates on known HTRW sites that would most impact the projest

or where HTRW materials may be influenced by the constructio~ 0:

project features.

Federal and New Jersey regulations governing contaminated

soil disposal and effluent discharge to surface water were

compared to the findings of the field investigation and the ERS.

Where avoidance was not a feasible alternative, engineering cost

estimates were prepared for features where site-related HTRW

materials would impact on construction activities. Estimated

costs of limited investigations to delineate HTRW at selected

features are also presented.

Following this Introduction (Section I), the HTRW

Investigation report is divided into three additional sections.

Section II, Investigative Approach and Methodology, details the

approaches and protocols followed to address the multi-task

objectives of the HTRW investigation. Section III, Information

Limitations, presents the limitations of results and findings for

the various tasks performed within the HTRW investigation.

Section IV, Results by Feature, is organized by project feature.

All tables,. figures and maps presenting data and findings for a

feature are inserted immediately after the discussion of that

feature. The results and findings of the field investigation and

ERS for each feature are presented. These data are incorporated

into a qualitative occupational health risk estimate, HTRW

remedial cost estimates, and where warranted, proposed further

field investigations of the feature are recommended and

justi:ied.

1-3

TIERRA-A-017492
II. INVESTIGATIVE APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

The objective of the HTRW investigation was to ascertain the

presence or absence of environmental__90ntamina~ion ~~ the soils

andlor groundwater for each proposed feature of the Passaic River

Flood Protection Project:---Field investigations and environmental

records searches were used to determine the nature of

contamination and if it may impact or be impacted by construction

activities. Chemical characterization of the soils and

groundwater allowed for the evaluation of soil disposal options

and dewatering operations in developing a risk-screening analysis

during actual construction of project features. In addition, the

information concerning any areas of environmental contamination

will augment the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

(SEIS) and General Design Memorandum (GDM) for this project as

required by the National Environmental Policy Act.

A. Environmental Records Search

The intent of the environmental records search (ERS) task of

this project was to identify known, high potential or low

potential HTRW sites that may affect construction or operation of

project features or where HTRW may he influenced by project

activities. The ERS focused on known HTRW sites along tunnel

alignment or those sites in close proximity to features

associated with the flood protection project. IT contacted

regulatory agencies to access and review archived files to

provide current HTRW-related information about each site.

A compiled master list of known HTRW sites was constructed

and a decision tree was utilized to reduce the number of "selected

sites for further consideration. A site priority ranking

methodology was developed.to establish the relative importance of

each site. To establish a qualitative health risk screening of

identified HTRW sites, occupational risk was calculated for siterelated HTRW contaminants associated with a particular tunnel

segment or feature.

Five primary documents were used to direct the environmental

records search in the development of Master List of Known HTRW

Sites:

• Pbase 3 Environmental Records Searcb, Passaic River

Local Flood Protection Pinal Report, Dames & Moore,

January 1.994.

• Environmental Records Search Report, Passaic River

Local Flood Protection Project, Passaic River Basin,

Roy F. Weston, April 1993.

• Known Contaminated Sites in New Jersey, NJDEP Site

Remediation Program, July 1994.

11-1 Nale. ~ Q'l tIS IJII\llI' .-1.-:1 tlV

USl.CE il*no1I Dcnc:l ~., lie

~d hi~ rw;xrt tlV rT ~

p-"

TIERRA-A-017493
• Vista Environmp.ntal Information, Inc. Report No.

7/045501-001, Corridor search (0.5 mile boundary) of

the tunnel alignment and 0.5 mile radius of Passaic

Levee No. 10 [ASTM Standard Practice Database Search) .

• Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Report No. 50838,--

300 yard boundary searches of each of the Pinchbrook,

Rockaway, and Passaic 2A and 2C Levee System features

[ASTM Standard Practice Database Search] .

The environmental records search reports compiled by Weston

and Dames & Moore identified several hundred known or potentially

contaminated sites that may impact the flood damage reduction

project. The HTRW sites identified in these two reports were the

initial foundation for development of a database of HTRW sites of

interest. IT conducted two additional ASTM standard practice

regulatory agency database searches to ensure that HTRW site

status in the study areas is current (i.e., information to 1994)

USACE-provided maps, maps in the Dames & Moore and Weston

reports, and maps obtained from vendors (ADR, PSE&G), were used

to locate and plot HTRW sites of interest. Incomplete addresses

and multiple owners of a property over time made plotting some

sites an uncertain task. Because more than half of the newly

identified HTRW sites in the two 1994 ASTM database searches were

not mappable because of incomplete addresses, windshield surveys

were initiated to locate the precise address of these HTRW sites

and to establish the current owner/occupant of a site if there

were conflicts between the most recent database searches and the

historic environmental records data. These surveys helped to

locate the site or clarify the present owner/occupant of· the site

in most cases. Not all sites could be located, particularly for

properties along Belleville Pike in the Kearny area. However;

using detailed maps and information provided by the FOI requests,

and the 1994 NJDEP report Known Contaminated Sites in New Jersey,

all unmappable sites were eventually located. All of the HTRW

sites newly identified by IT were out of the study boundary, were

located on the east bank of the Hackensack River, or had been

declared no further action (NFA) by NJDEP or USEPA.

As the master list of known HTRW sites was being compiled

from historic information and the ASTM database searches, formal

written requests were made to regulatory agencies to gain access

to archived files for each site of interest. Freedom-ofInformation Act (FOI) requests for each site were made to the

USEPA, NJDEP, and local agencies.

USEPA Region II, four NJDEP Site Remediation programs, and

ten local regulatory agencies were contacted and 206 FOI requests

were made for HTRW sites. Multiple requests to different

agencies were made for high priority HTRW sites. Table II-l

11-2

p.l:?

NoM: ~lJ'IlhsPllll"-.-llll'

USoI.CE 8eIImcn DIsln:1 ~ \:) the

....., 01 ....... .-.t by IT (;afawm

TIERRA-A-017494
summarizes agency contacts made for all FOI reques~s in the

expanded ERS.

Agencies responded to the FOI requests and made their files

available to IT staff for inspection. The FOr requests resulted

in obtaining further information for 59 sites. This informtionwas often in the form of copies of Preliminary Site Assessments

and updated analytical data attached to correspondence with

NJDEP. FOI requests also provided or confirmed NJDEP/USEPA

"Recommended no further action" for 26 sites.

The IT Corporation Environmental Records Search (ERS) relied

on the two previous records searches conducted by Dames & Moore

and Weston in 1992-1993. These combined previous searches

identified 117 known and 497 suspect (low or high potential) HTRW

sites within the study boundaries. Thus, these three ERS

identified 668 known or suspect HTRW sites within the study

boundary. The Scope of Work requested that IT identify a minimum

of 50 HTRW sites using risk screening procedures that would most

impact on construction or operation of all of the features of the

flood control project. IT achieved this objective by

categorizing known HTRW sites into four priority levels. The

priority ranking scheme used to select the sites with the most

potential impact is outlined below.

A decision tree displayed in Figure 11-1 was applied to the

Master List of HTRW sites to determine which sites would most

impact or be influenced by construction of the workshafts and

features. The decision tree and the nine criteria in Table 11-2

were used to eliminate HTRW sites from consideration in the risk

screening analyses.

HTRW sites selected for the risk screening process were

grouped by priority for risk characterization. Figure 11-2 shows

the HTRW site priority ranking scheme. Five priority rankings, A

through E, were established. Priority A HTRW sites were those

workshafts, inlets, and levees where IT conducted field

investigations and where intrusive construction activities are

anticipated. Priority B HTRW sites are located within 500 feet

of a workshaft/inlet or are within the footprint of a levee or

other feature. Priority C HTRW sites are located within 1,500

feet of a workshaft/inlet or are within a 300-foot boundary

around a levee feature. Priority D HTRW sites are located within

the tunnel alignment study area. Priority E HTRW sites are those

facilities that were deleted from consideration for risk

screening.

A priority E HTRW site ranking decision for the 109 sites

identified allowed the records search to focus on those HTRW

sites that may impact on construction of inlets, workshafts, and

project features. As discussed below, specific criteria were

used to place an HTRW site in the Priority E rank. Generally, a

11-3

TIERRA-A-017495
p~iority E site was either physically distant from project

features, had low levels of on-site contaminants, had remedial

design features that contain on-site contamination, or had known

levels of specific HTRW contaminants that would not pose a risk.

While risk screening calculations were not applied to these ._

sites, the historic HTRW information for these sites was

incorporated into the feature engineering alternatives and cost

estimates for HTRW disposal costs, if appropriate.

Three basic categories of criteria were used to delete a

site from further consideration:

• location of the site,

• regulatory status of the site, and

• nature and extent of site-related HTRW contaminants.

A site was deleted from consideration if it was located on

the east bank of the Hackensack River, or outside the tunnel

study area and the boundary areas of levees and other features.

A site was not considered for further risk-screening if the

available regulatory status information demonstrated that the

site had been recommended "no further actionll by either the USEPA

or NJDEP.

In reviewing the nature and extent of documented siterelated HTRW contaminants, the following criteria provided a

rationale for assigning a Priority E ranking to the HTRW site:

The only documented petroleum-based spill or leak at

the site was less than 100 gallons and there was no

impact to groundwater,

• Current HTRW surficial soil contaminant concentrations

are less than New Jersey direct contact soil cleanup

criteria levels,

Documented HTRW contaminants are limited to inorganic

metals, there is no impact to groundwater, and the site

is not within 500 feet of a workshaft or within a levee

footprint,

• A CERCLA!NPL site that is a secured radioactive

mate~ials storage facility with no documented impact to

soil or groundwater, and

A CERC~!SPL site that is a New Jersey Hudson County

chromate site where the known HTRW is limited to

chromate ore slag filIon the property.

11-4

TIERRA-A-017496
A site-specific HTRW database was constructed f~om ~wc ~ypes

of HTRW contaminant information: current analytical da~a :o~ se::

and water samples collected during IT field investigations, and

data compiled during the Environmental Records Search (ERS). The

database was used to prepare HTRW site summaries for all P~ior~~~

A,B,C and 0 HTRW sites. Table II-3 provides a brief explanation

of the information provided in each HTRW Site Summary. The HTRW

Site Summaries are included with the associated feature in

...

Section IV.

To provide consistent data entry for both types of available

analytical data into the database supporting risk screening and

remediation cost estimate analyses, a rigid format was utilized

to enable use of the" different types of site-related data.

HTRW analytical data for each site were sorted by the

environmental matrix and approximate depth of sample collection:

• surficial soil (0-2 feet),

• deep soil (3-100 feet or top of rock),

•

shallow grounQwater (unconsolidated till or 0-30 feet

below ground level), and

• deep groundwater (bedrock or greater than 30 feet below

ground level)

For each matrix, the principal HTRW contaminants that would

drive the site-related health risk/hazard analyses or remediation

of the site were identified. The following assumptions were used

for data reviewed to make up this data set:

• If the analytical results did not specify the depth of

the soil sample(s), the results were assumed to be

representative of surficial soil; unspecified

groundwater samples were assumed to be representative

of shallow groundwater contamination.

• The maximum concentration of each identified siterelated HTRW contaminant was used as a conservative

estimate of the maximal contamination that may be

encountered at a site.

• To provide conservative assumptions for the toxicity of

HTRW contaminants in the qualitative risk screenings,

concentrations of specific chemicals and classes of

chemicals were added together and reported as

equivalent values of a representative chemical. Table

II-4 identifies constituents grouped by chemical class

and reported as toxic equivalent factors (TEF) of a

reference or surrogate chemical.

11-5

TIERRA-A-017497
• Semi-quantitative analyses for petroleum and gasoline

contamination, such as to~al petroleum hydrocarbon

(TPH) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX)

were recorded to assist in remediation cost estimates.

Sites identified as contaminated with free product---

(e.g.,fuel, gasoline) are recorded and the approximate

thickness of the free product layer was noted.

Generic, non-specific soil and groundwater analyses

such as total volatile organic analytes (VOA) and total

base-neutral (B-N) compounds were considered low

quality data and were not included in the HTRW

analytical database. Other low quality analyses such

as the extraction procedure toxicity (EP Toxicity) and

toxic characteristic leaching procedures (TCLP) were

not included as indicators of soil contamination as

these analyses generally reported results of the

excavated materials that were removed from a site.

The available groundwater and soil analytical data for each

site were evaluated and scored by a ranking system to provide an

objective determination of the quality of the analytical data

reviewed. Data quality was based in part on the most recent year

that data was reported and the type of analyses conducted. For

soil data, the extent of soil remediation conducted at the site

was factored into the soil data quality score. The groundwater

data quality score was in~luenced by the certainty of knowledge

that site-related HTRW was impacting groundwate~.

Section IV of this report discusses the findings and results

of the potential interaction of these HTRW sites and the

associated feature.

B. Field Investigation Activities

This portion of the HTRW Report details the implementation

of the field investigation activities conducted to determine the

presence or absence and, if the former, nature of environmental

contamination at the selected workshafts, inlets, and Passaic

Levee No. 10 locations fo~ the Passaic River Flood Protection

Project.

1. Site Access/Work Locations

All permits required for the completion of test borings and

monitoring wells were obtained prior to the commencement of field

activities. The locations of the test borings and monitoring

we::~ were approved by the USACE Baltimore District and the

Passaic River Division. Access to the work locations was granted

to IT Corporation by the various property owners through Rightsof-Entry secured by the Passaic River Division of the USACE. Two

1I-6

TIERRA-A-017498
proposed drilling locations at the Works haft 3 location were

determined to be in a wetland and were subsequently relocated.

At a third location (i.e., the overburden monitoring well at the

Spur Inlet) it was not feasible to relocate the boring. The

required wetland disturbance permit had been secured prior to the

start of field activities. Prior to the commencement of -

intrusive subsurface investigations, such as test borings or well

installations, the presence and locations of underground

utilities were verified with the appropriate agencies.

Information concerning underground utilities was also obtained

from the individual property owners or their representatives and

from town officials when the field investigation activities

occurred on private property.

2. Sampling Methodology

The following subsections detail the methods employed to

obtain the environmental samples necessary to determine the

presence or absence and, if applicable, the nature of

environmental contamination at the individual workshaft

locations, including soil and groundwater sample collection

techniques, soil gas survey methods, and equipment

decontamination procedu~es.

All HTRW samples were collected in compliance with NJDEP

procedures, which are presented in the Field Sampling Procedures

Manual dated May 1992. The following procedures were followed

" for all HTRW sampling activities:

• Precleaned laboratory containers were used for all HTRW

samples collected during the project. Custody of the

bottles was initiated when IT field personnel received

them. Field personnel maintained custody of the

bottles in a locked and secured area until the bottles

were removed to collect samples.

All sample handling was kept to a minimum;

samples for VOC analysis were not aerated or

agitated.

•

• Gravel and pebbles were removed from soils during

collection.

• All required preservatives were added to sample bottles

prior to sample collection. Soil samples did not

require preservation. Aqueous samples were preserved

as noted in the final Chemical Data Acquisition Plan.

• Aqueous-sample containers for VOC analysis were filled

to capacity and did not contain air bubbles. Soil

sample jars for VOC analysis were filled to capaci~y

insuring that headspace present in the container was

11-7

TIERRA-A-017499
minimized. All other sample containers were filled ~o

near-capacity.

• All sample containers were sealed airtight.

e Samples were kept in a cooler with ice or blue ice

prior to and during shipment to the laboratory. The

ice or blue ice was sealed in airtight, plastic bags.

• Samples remained in custody of field personnel until

they were shipped to the lab.

• Sample holding times began at the time of sample

collection.

a) HTRW Soil Gas Surveys

As part of the field work for the Workshaft 2B and Spur

Inlet field investigations, soil gas surveys were conducted to

identify the extent of contamination and to locate potential hot

spots for shallow soil sampling. The soil gas surveys initially

consisted of gridding the work area with a SO foot by 50 foot

grid. All vertices within the grid were screened during the

initial site survey. Upon location of areas of suspected

contamination, the grid spacing was decreased to provide enhanced

resolution of the areas of interest.

The detection instruments that were used in the soil gas

survey were photoionization detectors (PIDs) with ultraviolet

lamps having ionization energies of 10.2 or 10.6 electron volts

(eV) .

The soil gas survey began with the insertion of a 1/2-inchdiameter stainless steel probe into the ground. The probe was

eq~ipped with G DODremovable tip for good ground penetration,

vent holes for gas entry, and a removable liner rod that helped

prevent soil intrusion into the probe. The expected penetration

depth was 4 feet, but in several locations was shallower due to

the presence of shallow gro~ndwater. A=ter the probe was driven

to the proper depth, the liner rod was removed and soil was

packed tightly around the probe at the ground surface to prevent

a~bient a~r flow ~nto the hole. Tubing was then connected to the

soil gas probe protruding from the ground at one end and to the

probe of the PID at the other end. The vacuum pump in the PID

drew soil gas through the instrument, and the peak reading (in

ppm) was recorded. The soil gas readings were used to determine

some of the shallow soil sampling locations at the Workshaft 2B-K

and Spur Inlet locations.

b) HTRW Borehole Soil Sampling

IU>UJIJIC/eyOUOU. <pt_n'JlJI 11-8

TIERRA-A-017500
HTRW borehole soil samples were obtained at the Worksha=~s

2B and 3, Spur Inlet, Pompton Inlet, and Passaic Levee No. lC

locations according to the following schedule. Two samples were

collected from the first 10 feet of drilling; one HTRW soil

sample was collected from each subsequent 10 feet of drilling

above the water table, and one HTRW sample was collected every-SC

feet of drilling below the water table. Deviations from this

sampling schedule due to field conditions or scope conditions are

discussed in Section IV of this report. These samples were

collected using 3-inch, stainless-steel split spoons. Splitspoon samples were collected by driving the split spoon into the

soil using a 140-pound hammer with an average free fall of 30

inches, per ASTM DlS86. Upon retrieval each split spoon was

opened, its contents were screened with a PID equipped with a

10.2eV lamp, and the sample ~as transferred into the appropriate

containers using a stainless-steel trowel. The sample for

volatile organic compounds (vaG) was collected first from the top

6-inch interval. The VaG samples were placed in a jar and sealed

within 15 seconds of removal of soil from the split spoon to

limit escape of volatiles. The jars were filled completely to

minimize any headspace. After the VaG sample was collected, the

remaining s,ample was mixed in a stainless-steel mixing bowl

before filling the remaining sample containers. All samples were

handled in the field using clean surgical gloves.

c) HTRW Shallow Soil Sampling

HTRW shallow soil samples were collected at the Workshafts

2B, 3, and 4; Spur Inlet; and Passaic Levee No. 10 locations.

Samples were collected with hand augers and soil-coring devices

from a depth of 0 to 24 inches, except where refusal occurred at

a shallower depth. Actual ,sample frequencies and depths for each

location are discussed in Section IV of this report.

The field sampling team began the collection of each shallow

sampl~ by clearing the desired location of all inconsequential

surface debris such as vegetation and rocks. The soil-coring

device was then driven to 24 inches or refusal, and the vaG

sample was collected immediately from the 6- to l2-inch interval.

After collection of the VOC sample, soil from each location was

collected with a hand auger and homogenized in a stainless-steel

bowl. The sample was then transferred into the appropriate

containers with a stainless steel trowel or spoon. The field

sampling team wore clean latex or PVG surgical gloves during the

collection and handling of all samples, changing gloves between

each sampling location.

d) HTRW Groundwater Sampling

Groundwater samples were collected from the overburden well

and pilot boring at the Workshaft 2B location, and from the

overburden wells at the Workshaft 3, Pompton Inlet, and Spur

IJlUlDe/qO'ZDN .~ __ II-9

TIERRA-A-017501
Inlet locations. Groundwater sampling began with the measuremen~

of water level and total well depth so that well volumes could be

calculated. Between three and five well volumes were then

evacuated from the overburden wells using a centrifugal pump and

from the pilot boring using a stainless steel submersible pump.

The water was discharged to the ground surface at least 20 feet---

from each well. IT field personnel measured water temperature,

pH, and conductivity before and after the well was purged. The

time lapse between purging and sample collecting did not exceed 2

hours for any sample. Groundwater samples were collected from

the wells with dedicated, stainless steel bailers.

Groundwater samples were also collected from pumping-test

and pilot wells at the conclusion of straddle-packer and pumping

tests at several locations including Workshafts 2 and 2C. The

samples were collected directly from sampling ports within the

pumping systems, located at the wellhead. These samples were

analyzed for additional water-quality parameters to determine the

acceptability of discharge of the pumped groundwater and to

determine if pumping operation had mobilized contaminants

present.

Groundwater samples were transmitted directly from bailers

or sampling ports into the required pre-preserved containers in

the following order, as applicable:

1. VOCs

2. TaX

3. TOC

4. SVOCs

5. Oil and grease/TPH

6. PCBs/pesticides/herbicides

7. Dioxin

8. Metals

9. Cyanide

10. Sulfate and chloride

11. Color and total dissolved solids

12. Nitrate-nitrite and ammonia

13. Radionuclides

14. Fluoride

15. Asbestos

16. Foaming agents

The locations, frequencies, and parameters for groundwater

samples at each work location are discussed in Section IV of this

report.

e) Equipment Decontamination Methods

The following summarizes the decontamination procedures that

were followed during the Passaic River Flood Protection Project

H~RW investigation field activities.

11-10

TIERRA-A-017502
(1) Contamination Control Zones

Contamination control zones were maintained to prevent the

spread of contamination and to prevent unauthorized persons from

entering potentially hazardous areas. The exclusion zone (EZ)

consisted of the entire area of suspected contamination. All

employees entering the EZ used proper personal protective

equipment as specified in the Site Safety and Health Plan and had

received the appropriate training for hazardous waste site work.

The EZ was a defined area where there was a possible respiratory

and/or dermal contact health hazard. The location of exclusion

zones at each workshaft location was identified by cones and/or

warning tape. Exclusion zones were established at Workshafts 2B

and 3, and at the Spur and Pompton Inlets.

The contamination reduction zone (CRZ), or transition area,

was established to perform decontamination of personnel and

equipment. All personnel entering or leaving the exclusion zone

passed through this area in order to prevent any crosscontamination and for the purpose of accountability. Tools and

any equipment or machinery were decontaminated in the CRZ. The

decontamination of all personnel and the removal of personal

protective outer garments and respiratory protection were also

performed in the CRZ.

The support zone (5Z) was a clean area outside the CRZ

located so as to prevent employee exposure to hazardous

substances. Eating, drinking, or smoking were permitted in the

support zone only after washing face and hands.

(2) Vehicle and Drilling Equipment

Decontamination

Any vehicles that entered the EZ were decontaminated prior

to leaving the CRZ. Decontamination of vehicles consisted of

high pressure hot water washing. All drilling equipment,

including rods, bits, and augers, were steam cleaned both inside

and outside prior to use and between each borehole. Well casings

and screens were also steam cleaned prior to installation. When

no samples for chemical analyses were to be collected,

decontamination of equipment used to recover soil samples (e.g.,

split spoons, Shelby tubes) consisted of an Alconox detergent

wash and tap water rinse. Waste fluids from decontamination were

collected and spoiled to the site in such a way as to minimize

erosion or spread of contaminants.

(3) Sampling Equipment Decontamination

Several types of sampling equipment were used to collect the

various environmental samples required during the Passaic River

Flood Protection Project. Stainless steel split spoon sample=s,

trowels, and bowls were used to collect soil samples designated

11-11

TIERRA-A-017503
for chemical analyses. Stainless steel bailers were used tD

collect groundwater samples. Procedures for on-site and o~:-s~~e

decontamination of sampling equipment are presented below. Acids

and solvents were not used for on-site decontamination.

Each piece of soil sampling equipment was decontaminated on

site prior to and between each use. Water level indicators used

during groundwater sampling were also decontaminated at the site

prior to and between each use. Decontamination of split spoon

samplers, spoons, bowls, and water level indicators consisted of

the following steps:

1. Alconox detergent and tap water scrub to remove visual

contamination;

2. Generous rinse with tap water;

3, Generous rinse with distilled and deionized water,

Any sampling equipment that showed, visual contamination

following this 3-step procedure was sent off site for the full 8-

step decontamination process, as described below for the bailers

used to collect groundwater samples for chemical analyses,

Bailers were cleaned and packaged off-site prior to the

commencement of sampling activities. Each decontaminated bailer

was dedicated for exclusive use at one sample location. Extra

bailers were available in the event that problems might have

occurred in obtaining a sample, Decontamination consisted of the

following steps:

1. Scrub with mixture of Alconox detergent and tap water;

2, Rinse generously with tap water;

3. Rinse with distilled and deionized water;

4. Rinse with 10 percent nitric acid·;

5, Rinse with distilled and deionized water;

6, Rinse with pesticide-grade isopropanol··;

7, Air dry;

8, Rinse generously with distilled and deionized water.

*

**

Only if sample was to be analyzed for metals

Only if sample was to be analyzed for organics

After each use, decontaminated equipment was left unwrapped

and was kept away from clean, unused sampling equipment. The

field deconned equipment and was sent back to the IT Corporation

office in Edison, NJ at the end of the day for the complete

eight-step decontamination procedure.

It was necessary to use a submersible pump to evacuate

standing water from the bedrock well at Workshaft 2B-K prior to

the collection of the groundwater sample, The cleaning process

employed prior to and between each use of that pump consisted of

lUlU/DIe/ ayO~20114. rpt. _&TIll' II-12

TIERRA-A-017504
a 20-gallon flush of distilled and deionized water through the

pump and discharge lines.

3. Field and Analytical QA/QC

The following subsections describe the QA/QC procedures--

applicable to the documentation of environmental sample

collection activities conducted during the HTRW investigation for

the Passaic River Flood Protection Project.

a) Field Documentation

All activities associated with the collection of

environmental samples for chemical (HTRW) analyses were

documented in the bound field notebook for each work location.

The information from the notebooks was used to complete a daily

QC report, detailing the day's sampling activities, weather

conditions, field instrument readings, and departures from the

approved sampling plans.

In addition to the daily QC report, a Sample Collection Log

was completed for each sample. The completed form contains the

date and time of collection, sample number, sample location

description, sample type, and, if applicable, sample depth. The

form also includes a list of all bottles used for that sample and

their respective lot numbers. All forms are included with the

other field documentation for each day's activities in the

project file maintained in the Edison, NJ office of IT

Corporation. Sample chain-of-custody (Cae) forms were completed

in the field.

(1) Logpooks/Field Activity Daily Logs

A record of each day's activities was maintained by the IT

site geologist and/or sampling personnel in a bound field

noteb90k at each work location. In some instances, such as when

multiple field investigation activities were taking place at a

given work location, the day's activities were also recorded on a

Field Activity Daily Log (FADL) for that work location. Each

day's entries include:

• An appropriate header, including project

name, project number, site location (e.g.,

Works haft 2, 2B-Fiore, or 2C), and date.

• Time and weather conditions as the first

entry for each day. Significant

climatological changes were noted throughout

the day.

• The names and affiliations of field personnel

and visitors to the site.

rr-13

TIERRA-A-017505
• Field equipment identification including

type, manufacturer, model number, and serial

number; and field equipment calibration data,

if applicable.

• A general description of the day's field

activities showing a chronological sequence

of events.

• Field measurements, including units.

• References to appropriate field forms for

details of each activity performed.

• The location and time of all samples

collected during the day.

Any changes from the workplan and a rationale

for the change.

Maintained as described above, the field notebook contains

the "master" record of the field work performed for each given

day. Each page of the field notebook is numbered, signed, and

dated, and is accompanied by the various forms described herein,

as applicable, to document specific data. An example FADL is

shown in Figure 11-3.

(2) Chain of Custody

Each sample that was delivered to a laboratory for analysis

was accompanied by a Chain-of-Custody (CoC) form. The IT CoC

forms are preprinted with ~ unique 6-digit control number in the

upper right corner. The form is a two-part form. The white copy

of each form accompanied the samples to the laboratories and the

yellow copy was maintained in the field project file. The

conte~ts of this file were transferred to the project central

file at the completion of the field program.

The CoC form was signed by each individual who had the

samples in her or his possession before the samples were

delivered to the lab. Sample custody is discussed in greater

detail below. Copies of ~he CoC forms for this project are

provided with the analytical reports. An example CoC form is

shown in Figure II-4.

b) Equipment Decontamination

All equipment used during the sampling activities as

required by the grour.dwater and HTRW investigations for the

Passaic River Flood Protection Project was decontaminated before

use on site and between each sampling event. Specific

decontamination procedures for vehicle/drilling equipment and for

K1lU/"Q/.yono ... rpt._~ 11-14

TIERRA-A-017506
environmental sample collection equipment were discussed

previously.

c) Field QC/QA Samples

This section describes the field quality control and qual~~y

assurance samples that were collected for the project.

(1) Collection of Quality Control Samples

Three types of field quality control samples were collected

during the project: trip blanks, rinsate blanks, and replicate

samples. Additionally, the field sampling team collected double

volume for matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD)

analyses at a frequency of one MS/MSD sample per soil strata at

each workshaft location. During soil drilling and sampling, if a

different soil strata was encountered, then an extra volume was

collected from that strata for an additional MS/MSD. The

analytical data for the MS/MSD samples was used to determine

whether matrix interferences are affecting the lab data. The

applications and frequency of the field QC samples were as

follows:

• Trip Blanks: the sampling team bottled and preserved a

sample of deionized and distilled water, carried it

with them to all sampling locations, and delivered it

to the laboratory with the environmental samples. The

purpose of collecting trip blanks is to determine

whether samples are being contaminated during transit

or sample collection. One trip blank was sent with

each cooler that contained groundwater samples for VOC

analyses, and th~ trip blanks were analyzed for VOCs.

Trip blanks are not required for soil sampling.

• Rinsate Blanks (Field Blanks): the sampling crew

collected the deionized and distilled water from the

final rinse of fully-decontaminated sampling equipment

and delivered it to the lab(s) for analysis. The

purpose of collecting rinsate blanks is to determine

whether the sampling equipment is causing crosscontamination of samples. The sampling team collected

one rinsate blank per matrix per day per site location.

• Replicate (Field Duplicate) Samples: randomly-chosen

environmental samples were split into, and labeled as,

two separate samples for chemical analysis. The

laboratories did not know the identity of replicates.

The purpose of collecting replicates is to determine

the representativeness of chemical data for

environmental samples. The sampling team collected at

least one replicate per 10 field samples of each

11-15

TIERRA-A-017507
matrix. Replicates were analyzed for all the same

parameters as ~heir co-located sample.

The total number of QC samples collected was greater than 10

percent of the total number of samples collected.

(2) Collection of Split Samples (QA Samples)

Some of the field samples were collected and homogenized,

and then split into two equal parts and placed into separate sets

of containers. These samples served as "QA Samples" for

comparison of data obtained from the project's laboratories and

the QA Lab listed below. Samples for vac analysis were not

homogenized, but instead were collected directly into the two

sets of containers. ITAS-Edison/Quanterra provided bottles with

teflon-lined seals designated'as "QA samples" to be used for the

collection of split samples. Split samples were analyzed for the

following parameters: Pests/PCBs, TPH, VOAs, Semi-VOAs, Cyanide,

TAL Metals, Herbs and Gross Alpha/Beta. The first set of

containers was sent to the IT-contracted laboratories. The

second set of containers for each QA sample, with the exception

of sample containers to be analyzed for Gross Alpha/Beta, was

sent to the quality assurance laboratory for this contract:

New England Division Water Quality Laboratory

Barre Falls Dams, RFDII

476 Coldbrook Road

Hubbardston, MA 01452-9743

Attn: Brian Condike

Phone: (508) 928-4238

Gross Alpha/Beta QA ~amples were sent to:

Pace, Inc.

5930 McIntyre Street

Golden, CO 80403

Telephone: (303) 278-3400

An advance copy of chain-of-custody forms for gross

alpha/beta samples was sent to the above QA lab (Fax I: 508-928-

5494). Chain-of-custody forms accompanying QA sample shipments

to the QA lab had the project number E0236 written on it.

The total number of QA samples collected and sent to the QA

laboratory was greater than 10 percent of the total number of

field samples collected. QA samples were collected, handled, and

transported in exactly the same manner as all other samples.

Five sets of samples were sent to the QA laboratories for

duplicate analyses. Data comparisons for these samples were as

follows:

1I-16

TIERRA-A-017508
Analyte Group Qualitative Aareernent

Volatiles

Semi-volatiles

Pesticides/PCBs

Trace metals

Radioactivity

Cyanide

Herbicides

TPH

100%

100%

100%

96%

100%

100%

100%

50%

The ~ow value for TPH was due to one major discrepancy on a

particular sample which fell outside of the upper limit of

acceptability established by the QA laboratory. Additionally,

the magnitude of the discrepancy was enhanced by the relatively

smal~ number of TPH samples sent to the QA laboratory. The QA

laboratory concluded that the contract laboratory's performance

was satisfactory for all analyses with the exception of the TPH

sample discussed above.

d) Sample Preservation Packaging and Shipping

This section describes the preservation, labeling, custody,

and transportation of HTRW samples.

(1) Sample Preservation

Preservatives were used to stabilize certain portions of

water samples collected for this project. Preservatives were not

used for soil samples.' When preservatives were required, they

were added to the bottles at the laboratory prior to sample

collection. The preservativ~s for water samples included

hydrochloric acid for VOCs analyses, nitric acid for metals

(except hexavalent chromium) and gross tt/~ analyses, sulfuric

acid for Toe and nitrate/nitrite analyses, and sodium hydroxide

for cyanide analyses. Samples were also maintained at cold

temperatures to stabilize all parameters.

(2) Sample Labeling/Identification

Sample labels were completed for each sample using indelible

ink. All samples were adequately marked for identification from

the time of collection and packaging through shipping and

storage. Sampling identification included, as appropriate:

• Project name and number

• Sample number

• Sample location (e.g., boring, depth or sampling

interval, and field coordinates)

IIDU/UlCI.yO'20M.~_1lt'JII' 11-17

r·Z1

TIERRA-A-017509
Sampling date and time

The name of the individual performing the sampling

• Sample preservative, if any.

(3) Sample Custody

An overriding consideration for data resulting from

environmental samples is the ability to demonstrate that the

samples were obtained from the locations stated and that they

reached the laboratory without alteration. Evidence of

collection, shipment, laboratory receipt, and laboratory custody

until disposal was documented to accomplish this. Documentation

was accomplished through a Chain of Custody (CoC) form that

records each sample and the individuals responsible for sample

collection, shipment, and receipt. A sample was considered to be

in custody if it was:

• In a person's actual possession

• In view, after being in physical possession

• Locked so that no one can tamper with it, after having

been in physical custody

• In a secured area, restricted to authorized personnel.

(4) Sample Packaging and Shipment

Samples were packaged in waterproof insulated plastic

coolers. About 1 inch of inert cushioning material (e.g.,

bubble-wrap) was placed in the bottom of each cooler. Labeled

sample containers were enclosed in clear plastic bags and placed

upright in the cooler without touching. The coolant (crushed ice

or blue ice) was then added, followed by more packing material to

completely fill the cooler. The paper work (chain-of-custody

form) was placed in a plastic bag and taped to the inside of the

coole.r lid.

For samples transported directly to the laboratory, the

white copy of the chain-of-custody form was kept in the

possession of the person delivering the samples.

For samples shipped to the laboratory by commercial carrier,

the white copy of the chain-af-custody form was placed in the

shipping container, and the shipping container sealed prior to

giving it to the carrier. Custody seals were attached to the

front right and back left of each cooler and were covered with

clear plastic tape. The cooler was strapped shut with tape in at

least two locations. Samples were shipped within 24 hours of

collection.

For the samples shipped by commercial carrier, the waybill

serves as an extension of the chain-of-custody record between the

11-18

TIERRA-A-017510
final field custodian and receipt in the laboratory. (The

carrier and waybill number were written on the chain-of-custody

form). Commercial carriers are not required to sign off on the

custody forms as long as the custody forms are sealed inside the

sample cooler and the custody seals remain intact.

C. Occupational Qualitative Risk Screening Analyses

The objective of this task was to review and organize the

available site-related HTRW data in a manner to interpret the

potential impact of identified HTRW contaminants to workers

occupationally exposed to soil and groundwater during

construction activities of the tunnel and associated features.

Limited risk screening calculations were used to assess potential

health hazards at HTRW sites by providing basic numerical

estimates of cancer and non-cancer risks. These calculated risk

estimates should not be construed as representing a complete

multiple exposure pathway risk assessment. Rather, the sitespecific risk estimates are intended to provide a qualitative

assessment of occupational health hazards that may be associated

with construction activities for the various project features.

Limitations of the risk screening procedures used for this

qualitative assessment are detailed in Section III.

The HTRW constituents of concern listed in each HTRW site

summary (see Section IV, Results by Feature) may differ from the

data in screening criteria comparison tables. These comparison

tables presents analytical data from the field investigation for

samples where HTRW concentrations are compared to screening

criteria specific to USEPA or New Jersey regulations listed

below:

Documented HTRW contaminants at each known site were

identified in the environmental records search or from

environmental samples collected during IT field investigations of

inlets, workshafts, and at Passaic Levee 10. The maximum value

of each identified BTRW contaminant was used in these analyses to

provide a conservative estimate of the extent of soil/groundwater

contamination. These upperbound estimates of HTRW contaminant

concentrations or toxic equivalent factors (TEF) were used in

screening criteria comparisons and in the risk screening analyses

for occupational exposure to contaminated environmental media.

Haz Waste

Classification

NJDEPE Guidance Document for Remediation

of Contaminated Soils, June 1994

Non Res Soil NJDEPE Soil Cleanup Criteria, February 3,

1994

Res Soil NJDEP Soil Cleanup Criteria, February 3, 1994

Soil Impact to GW NJDEP Soil Cleanup Criteria, February 3, 1994

11-19

TIERRA-A-017511
Freshwater (al

Freshwater (c)

FW2-NT (a)

FW2-NT (c)

FW2-NT (h)

SE (a)

SE (c)

SE (h)

SE (he)

USEPA Surface Water Criteria, Novembe~ 199:

(Acute)

USEPA Surface Water Criteria, November 1991

(Chronic)

NJDEPE Surface Water Quality Standards, Apri~

1994 (Acute)

NJDEPE Surface Water Quality Standards, April

1994 (Chronic)

NJDEPE Surface Water Quality Standards, April

1994 (Human Carcinogenic)

NJDEPE Surface Water Quality Standards, April

1994 (Acute)

NJDEPE Surface Water Quality Standards, April

1994 (Chronic)

NJDEPE Surface Water Quality Standards, April

1994 (Human Health)

NJDEPE Surface Water Quality Standards, April

1994 (Human Carcinogenic)

The maximum soil values for priority rank B sites were also

compared to the screening criteria.

These screening criteria are useful for estimating soil

disposal and groundwater discharge cost estimates for features

that may require remeciation or treatment during construction

activities. The data in the table are limited to those sites

sampled during the field investigation and for Priority B HTRW

sites identified in the ERS. The screening criteria presented

are not applicable to assessing health hazards from dermal

contact exposure to soil or water.

The HTRW site summaries include analytical data from the

HTRW field investigation or historic analytical data compiled

during the ERS. Health risks at HTRW sites are generally driven

by a few principal constituents and the HTRW constituents of

concern listing for each site is limited to HTRW constituents

that maximize calculated health risks. Table II-4 lists the

chemical or class of chemicals that were weighed for their

inherent toxicity using Toxic Equivalent Factors (TEF) in the

risk screening process for this study. Furthermore, the use of

surrogate chemicals and TEF in the conservative risk screening

protocol skews the analytical data in the health hazard risk

estimates. For example, the analytical data for 10 polycyclic

aromatic hydrocarbons (PAR) were summed and presented as a single

concentration of benzo(a)pyrene equivalents in the HTRW site

summary.

The qualitative risk screening protOCOl for assessment of

site-related HTRW was based on a single exposure pathway, dermal

contact with an environmental media. The risk screening

protocol, discussed below, estimated human health cancer risks

and non-cancer health hazards that may be associated with

11-20

TIERRA-A-017512
Health and Safety

Since HTRW impact costs do not include activities like ear~h

excavation and groundwater pumping costs, therefore the presen~ed

health and safety costs are associated only with handling of HTRW

materials.

Potential upgrading of Health and Safety required measures

includes Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), ai~ monitoring and

equipment decontamination.

For hazardous soils contaminated with metals and organics

upgraded level D PPE was assumed. Additionally dust control, and

equipment decontamination costs were included. An estimated cost

of 15 percent of the total construction cost, including

contingencies was added to the total estimated direct

construction cost to provide for health and safety.

For hazardous soils contaminated with dioxins, PCBs and

pesticides level C PPE was assumed. A factor of 25 percent was

chosen for the Health and Safety.

Future Investigations

Further investigations will be necessary at some feature or

sub feature locations. At floodwall and levee site locations with

unknown but potential soil contamination, surface soil samples

would be collected every 100 feet for analysis. Parameters for

analysis will include VOCs; SVOCs; TPH; pesticides and PCBs,

herbicides; dioxin; metals; hexavalent Chromium, cyanide: and

TCLP as necessary.

Workshaft areas of intrusive disturbance, which have not

been previously investigated, should be sampled. It was

estimated that 10 to 15 surface and 8 to 10 subsurface soil

samples would be collected for analysis at a workshaft area of

approximately 1.5 to 2 acres. The samples will be analyzed for

the same parameters as samples collected from levees and

floodwall areas.

Additional groundwater investigations will be required at

selected future locations. Those investigations will involve

installation of shallow monitoring wells and deep bedrock wells

where specified. Groundwater samples will be collected from

pumping tests and pilot wells at the conclusion of straddlepacker and pumping tests. The number of groundwater samples

collected for analysis will be defined separately at each well

location, and will be at least two samples per zone. Samples

collected during future groundwater investigations shall be

analyzed for the same parameters as the samples collected during

the current IT investigations.

II-3D

TIERRA-A-017513
IV. RESULTS BY FEATURE

The results of the HTRW investigation for each project

feature are presented in this chapter. The environmental records

search findings are discussed for each feature, and the field

investigation results are presented for the applicable featureS:--

The analytical data are compared with applicable screening

criteria on a site-specific basis. For example, the Pompton

Inlet data are compared with soil cleanup criteria and with

freshwater quality and effluent standards, but not with saltwater

standards. The screening criteria used for comparison to project

data are listed in Section II.C of this report.

The presentation of results for each feature is followed by

a discussion of potential impacts including risk-screening

analysis, recommendati0ns for additional investigations and

response alternatives, and estimated costs for the recommended

investigations and responses. The project features are discussed

according to type, in the following order: tunnel inlets, tunnel

segments, the tunnel outlet, weirs, channel modifications,

Pompton levee systems, central basin levees, and hurricane levee

systems.

IV-l

TIERRA-A-017514
5. Workshaft 2B

a) Investigation Results

(1) Field Investigation

IT conducted an HTRW field investigation at the proposed

location of Workshaft 2B, the old Keegan landfill, and a

groundwater and HTRW investigation at a nearby location, the

Fiore Disposal Company site. The locations of the Keegan and

Fiore sites are shown in Figure IV-1I. IT supervised the

com letion of two boreholes (IT-25K-PBOl and IT-2BK-OB01) at the

Keegan s~te an tree ore 0 es - BF-PB 1, IT- BF-PW , and

IT-2BF-OB01) at the Fiore site. Wells were constructed in each

of the boreholes. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of

approximately 4 to 6 feet below ground surface at both sites.

The details of drilling and well installat~on are d1scussed in

the Groundwater Investigation Report for this project. The

locations of all five wells are shown in Figure IV-II, rV-I1A and

IV-11B. A summary of detected compounds and applicable screening

criteria is included in Table IV-A-S-l.

........

The stratigraphy ~t the Workshaft 2B Keegan location, from

ground surface to the top of bedrock, consisted of refuse and

soil fill material to 6 feet: organic soil with fill settled in

to 9 feet; silty sand to 20.5 feet; medium- to coarse-grained

sand to 25 feet; sandy silt with clay to 50 feet; varved clay and

silt with thin sand seams to 100 feet; silty sand to 140 feet:

and glacial till to 155 feet. The stratigraphy at the Fiore

location is similar, except that the refuse is absent and the

glacial till extends to a depth of 285 feet before bedrock is

encountered. The interbed~ed shale and siltstone bedrock at

Workshaft 2B is indicative of the lowermost unit of the Passaic

Formation.

~T collected soil samples for chemical analysis from the 8-

to 10-foot, 12- to 14-foot, 50- to 52-foot, and 100- to 104-foot

intervals in IT-2BK-PB01. The presence of refuse and cut gravel

precluded sampling in the first 8 feet of the borehole. The

driller overdrove the split-spoon samplers to minimize the

effects of drilling mud on the analysis. Soil samples were also

collected from the 2- to 4-foot and 4- to 6-foot intervals in IT2BK-OBOI. The samples were analyzed for VOCs; SVOCs; TPH;

pesticides and PCBs: herbicides; 2,3,7,8-TCDD; metals: chromium

VI; cyanide: and gross a and~. The 100- t~~-foot sample was

not analyzed for herbicides or 2,3,7,8-TCDD. All four samples

from IT-2BK-PBOl were also analyzed for asbestos. IT did not

collect soil samples for chemical analysis at the Fiore site

because the workshaft construction is proposed for the Keegan

site.

mU~/.JO'20" .Ep6_m'D

IV-20

TIERRA-A-017515
Several SVOCs, pesticides, PCBs, and metals were detected in

the overburden-well soil samples. The SVOCs benzo(a) anthracene,

benzo (b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene,

dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene; the PCB

aroclor 1248; and lead were detected above the NJDEP Residential

Soil Cleanup Criteria in both samples. The pesticide aldrin w~

detected above the NJDEP criterion in the 4- to 6-foot sample,

while the metals berium and cadmium were detected above the

criteria in the 2- to 4-foot sample. Several SVOCs and metals

were detected in the pilot-boring soil samples, but at

concentrations below the NJDEP criteria. Pesticides and PCBs

were not detected in the pilot-boring soil samples.

A few VOCs were detected at low concentrations below the

NJDEP residential criteria in the IT-2BK-OBOl soils. VOCs were

not detected in the pilot-boring samples. TPH was detected in

the IT-2BK-OBOI samples at concentrations below the Hazardous

Waste Classification criterion, and was not detected in the IT2BK-PBOl samples. Gross a and ~ were not detected at levels

significantly above background in the 2BK soil samples.

Herbicides, 2,3,7,8-TCDD, cyanide, and chromium VI were not

detected in the 2BK soil-boring samples.

The soil between the depths of 2 and 8 feet at the Workshaft

2B location are evaluated as contaminated and possibly hazardous

with respect to SVOCs, pesticides, and metals. It is also

evaluated as nonhazardous contaminated with respect to PCBs. The

soil below 8 feet is evaluated as noncontaminated.

In addition to the soil-boring samples. IT collected

t~irteen surface soil samples at the Workshaft 2B Keegan

location. The samples were. analyzed for VOCs; SVOCs; TPH;

pesticides and PCBs; herbicides; 2,3,7,S-TCDD; metals; chromium

VI; cyan1de; and gross a and ~.

The dioxin com ound 2,3,7,8-TCDD was detected in four

surface samples at concentrations ranging from . 4 to .5 ug/kg.

Although the NJDEP does not have published guidance values for

dioxin in soils, the 2BK surface soil is evaluated as

contaminated with respect to dioxin.

Several SVOCs, pesticides, PCBs, and metals were detected in

all the surface soil samples. Concentrations for at least three

analytes in each sample exceed the NJDEP Residential Soil Cleanup

Criteria. The maximum detected concentrations were:

Compound Cone. (ug(kg)

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

4,400

13,000

4,200

IV-21

TIERRA-A-017516
Benzo(a)pyrene

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

Hexach1orobenzene

Indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene

Aldrin

4,4'-DDE

4,4'-DDT

PCBs (Aroclor 1260)

8,100

1,300

140,000

3,600

45

73,000

50,000

120,000

Analyte

Antimony

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Copper

Lead

Nickel

Silver

Vanadium

Zinc

Cone. (mg/kg)

1,680

23,200

9.1

112

55,400

13,000

1,330

187

943

10,100

Several other SVOCs, pesticides, and metals were detected in

the surface soil samples, but at concentrations below the NJDEP

standards.

TCE was detected in surface sample 2BK-S-HA13 at 7.7 ug/kg,

substantially lower than the NJDEP standard of 1,000 ug/kg. VOCs

were not detected in any other 2BK surface soils. TPH was

detected in all the surface samples, at concentrations ranging

from 42 to 24,000 mg/kg. Herbicides were detected in most of the

surface samples, between 0.75 and 35 ug/kg. Cyanide was detected

in twelve of the thirteen surface samples collected at the

Workshaft 2BK location, but at concentrations below the NJDEP

residential criterion. Gross a and P were not detected at levels

signi_ficantly above background in the 2BK surface soil samples.

Chromium VI was not detected in the 2BK surface soil samples.

The surface soil at the Workshaft 2B location is evaluated

as hazardous with respect to dioxin and PCBs. It is also

evaluated as contaminated and possibly hazardous with respect to

SVOCs, pesticides, and metals.

Straddle-packer tests were performed on pilot hole IT-2BFPBOI as part of the groundwater investigation. During the packer

tests, IT collected groundwater samples from depths of 343 to 353

feet and 364 to 374 feet. The samples were analyzed for VOCs;

SVOCs; pesticides and PCBs; 2,3,7,8-TCDD; metals; chromium VI;

cyanide; and gross a and p. The shallower sample was also

analyzed for herbicides.

IV-22

TIERRA-A-017517
Analysis showed that concentrations of the VOC

trichloroethene (TCE) in both samples were substantially higher

than the freshwater and saltwater effluent standards. Phenols

were also detected at concentrations above the freshwater and

saltwater effluent criteria in both samples. Several other VOCs

were detected in the sample at concentrations below the effluent

standards. Lead, mercury, silver, and zinc were detected in one

or both of the straddle-packer samples, at concentrations below

the water quality criteria and effluent standards.

In response to the high TCE concentrations, IT used a carbon

filtration unit prior to the performance of a packer test at 340

feet and a 72-hour pumping test at 378 feet in IT-2BF-PWOl.

Samples for VOC analysis were then collected at the influent and

effluent ports of the treatment unit according to the following

schedule:

I I

Influent ]

Effluent

Samples Samples )

I during straddle I

1 1

packer testing

at 0 hour of 72- 1

hour pumping test

I:: I

_. - -_.-

hour 12 1

hour 24 1 1

I

at hour 36 I 1

I

at hour 48 I 1

at hour 60 1

at hour 72 1 i 1

TOTAL 8 3 -- -

In addition to VOC analysis, the effluent sample at 24 hours

of the pumping test was also analyzed for total organic carbon

(TOC). The influent sample at 72 hours was analyzed for SVOCs;

pesticides and PCBs; metals; chromium VI; cyanide; and gross a

and ~.

The analyses showed that the influent groundwater was

contaminated with TCE, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and trans-l,2-

dichloroethene at concentrations above the effluent standards

throughout the packer and pumping tests. TeE concentrations

ranged from 511 ~g/L, at 48 hours into the pumping test, to 850

~g/L at 0 hours. PCE concentrations ranged from an estimated

TIERRA-A-017518
\

}

18.2 ~g/L at 48 hours to 52.8 ~g/L at 0 hours. Trans-l,2-

dichloroethene concentrations ranged from 50.6 ~g/L at 48 hours

to 106 ~g/L at 0 hours. VOCs were not detected in the effluent

samples, indicating the effectiveness of the filtration unit.

Over the 72 hour pumping test, the VOC concentration appeared to

reach steady-state. ----

Several metals were detected in the influent sample

collected at the end of the 72-hour pumping test. Zinc was

detected above the freshwater and saltwater effluent standards in

that sample. Manganese was detected above the NJDEP saltwater

quality criterion, however, there is no effluent standard for

manganese. Gross a and ~ were not detected at levels

significantly above background in the sample. All other listed

analytes were not detected in the 2BF groundwater sample

collected at the end of the pumping test.

In addition to the groundwater samples collected at the

Fiore site, IT collected groundwater samples from the pilot hole

and overburden well at the Keegan site. Sample collection

occurred prior to the installation of the multiport system in the

pilot hole, therefore, the sample was a composite of the water

column from 4 to 510 feet. The samples were analyzed for VOCs;

SVOCs; pesticides and PCBs; metals; chromium VI; cyanide; and

gross a and ~. The overburden well sample was also analyzed for

nerb~c~des and 2,3,7,S-TCDD.

TCE and 1,2-dichloroethene were detected above the

freshwater and sa~t~~~e~_~%f!~~n~ standards in the pilot-hole

sample. PCE was detected above the water-quality criteria but

below the effluent standards in the same sample. VOCs were not

detected in the Workshaft 2B overburden sample. Acetone was

detected in the overburden-'and pilot-well samples at respective

concentrations of 12 and 17 ~g/L, substantially lower than the

NJDEP standard of 700 ~g/L. The herbicide dinoseb was detected

in th~ IT-2BK-OBOI sample at an estimated concentration of 0.027

P.g/L.

~everal metals were detected in the Workshaft 2B groundwater

samples. Iron and zinc were detected at concentrations above the

freshwater and saltwater effluent standards in both samples.

L~~5Lwas detected above the effluent standards ~n the overburden

~a~ple. Lead in the pilot-hole sample, as well as arsenic and

mercury in both samples, were detected at concentrations above

freshwater and saltwater quality criteria but below effluent

standards. Copper was detected above EPA freshwater quality

criteria but below effluent standards in the overburden sample.

Manganese was detected above the saltwater quality criteria in

both samples, however, there are no effluent standards for

manganese. Gross ~ was detected at 65 picocuries per gram, a

level above background, in the sample from the overburden well.

IV-24

TIERRA-A-017519
Gross tt was not detected at a level significantly above

background in either sample. All other listed analytes were not

detected in the Workshaft 2B groundwater samples.

Based on the results presented above, groundwater at

Workshaft 2B will have to be treated for removal of VOCs and---

metals, and possibly phenols, prior to its discharge to surface

water. In addition, further sampling is recommended to determine

whether specific radionuclides are present at detrimental levels

in the groundwater.

(2) Environmental Records Search

Six HTRW sites were located within 1,500 feet of the

worksite 2B-Fiore (Tables IV-A-S-2, IV-A-S-3, and IV-A-S-4A, and

Figure IV-II).

Warner Manufacturing, a Priority C HTRW site, is identified

as an ISRA property with low quality analytical data scores for

both soil and groundwater. Recent on-site surficial soil data

(1993) indicated total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)

concentrations of approximately 1,600 mg/kg, a level below New

Jersey non-residential soil cleanup criteria.

Kleer Kast Inc, a SPL chromium site, has additional HTRW

contaminants, petroleum-contaminated soil and groundwater,

related to LUST remediation of three USTs in April, 1993. In

September 1993, NJDEP has directed Kleer Kast to delineate the

horizonal and vertical extent of the petroleum contamination in

soils and install groundwater monitoring wells as free product

was observed at one excavation site. The FOI review of the files

for this site did not prov~de analytical data for the LUST

remediation. Because of the petroleum-related HTRW, Kleer Kast

was considered a Priority D HTRW site.

Four HTRW sites near Worksite 2B-Fiore, Frank's Auto

Electric, Kenney Steel Treating Corp., T.J. McDermott

Transportation Co., and West Hudson Lumber Co., are Hudson County

SPL chromium sites. HTRW contaminants at these sites are limited

to chromate slag fill and these properties were considered

Priority E HTRW sites.

Ten HTRW sites were identified that are located within 1,600

feet of worksite 2B-Keegan (Table IV-A~5-4B and Figure IV-II).

The worksite was located on the edge of Keegan Landfill and

surrounded by active and abandoned industrial properties.

Industrial contamination associated with many of these sites are

metals (e.. , chrom~um, ea, co per na ave a ow 1

for horizonal and vertical migration. Guignon & Greene and

Diamond Head Oil-~RefII1eryproperty are except~ons. Diamond Head

Oil, approximately 1,600 feet south-southeast of the worksite,

IV-25

TIERRA-A-017520
has on-site groundwater that is severely impacted bv chlo=ina~ed

solvents and petroleum products.

Keegan Landfill, a Priority B HTRW site, is a closed 230

acre unlined landfill in a wetlands area that accepted indust~ial

waste including metal slurries, pigments, and waste solvents.

Several underground fires have occurred at the site as recent as

1987. The analytical data for both soil and groundwater are low

quality and based on a few samples collected in 1989. Lead,

PCBs, and PAHs levels exceed New Jersey soil cleanup criteria.

Groundwater analyses were limited to metals determination and

indicated lead and mercury impact the groundwater.

Property known as the Diamond Head Oil Refinery, a Priority

C HTRW site, is now an inactive IS-acre site. Low quality data

for soil describe elevated levels of HTRW contaminants including

aluminum (22,300 mg/kg), lead (8,100 mg/kg), and zinc (1,040

mg/kg). The groundwater table at the site varies from 4 to 14

feet bgl. Medium quality (1994) analytical data for shallow

groundwater indicates extensive contamination with metals,

chlorinated solvents, vinyl chloride, BTEX, and other organic

compounds. Free product was reported in on-site wells.

Guigon & Greene Co. blends and processes petroleum and nonpetroleum oils, fuels, and solvents. No analytical data is

available for this Priority C site but a history of spills and

fires at the site suggest probable HTRW contamination.

Groundwater is 1-2 feet bgl.

Kearny Smelting and Refining Company, a Priority C HTRW

site, smelts scrap metal to produce bronze and brass ingots.

Historically, wastewater f~om the operation was discharged to an

unlined lagoon. The facility has received numerous citations for

mismanagement of hazardous wastes and spills. The available

analytical data for this site is considered low quality and is

base~ on soil samples taken in 1986. Surficial soil levels of

PABs and several metals greatly exceed soil cleanup criteria and

include antimony (427 mg/kg), cadmium (600 mg/kg), lead (15,300

rng/kg), silver (1,130 mg/kg), and zinc (81,200 rng/kg). No data

was available to assess potential HTRW impact on groundwater.

G&S Motor Equipment Co., a Priority C HTRW site, has

surficial soil contamination of PCBs (532 mg/kg), lead (1,010

mg/kg), and chromium (S78 mg/kg) based on low quality analytical

data collected in 1988. No data was available for site-related

HTRW impact to groundwater.

Drew Chemical Corp is a Priority D HTRW site. High quality

(1992) soil HTRW data indicates PARs and TPH exceed soil cleanup

criteria. No groundwater data was available for review. Depth

to groundwater is approximately 20 feet bgl.

IV-26

TIERRA-A-017521
to be performed on the workshaft. For as long as dewatering of

the excavation is required, contaminants may be mobilized by the

flowing groundwater, which would bring them into the excavation.

The geotechnical design of the workshaft includes installation of

structures that will minimize the inflow of groundwater into the

excavation.

Either a slurry wall will be installed around the shaft

excavation or ground freezing will be implemented to minimize

infiltration of groundwater. The slurry wall would be installed

in the overburden soils around the shaft location. This

structure will reduce groundwater infiltration into the

overburden excavation to nearly zero. Ground freezing

implemented around the shaft will reduce this infiltration to

zero. The bedrock will be grouted prior to workshaft excavation

to minimize groundwater seepage. In addition, shotcrete and rock

bolts will be used for primary support. These measures will

minimize the influx of water. Uncontrolled seepage was assumed

to be 60 gpm.

c} Recommendations for Additional HTRW

Investigation

HTRW data from the field investigation at Workshaft No. 2B

included results for surficial soil, deep soil, shallow and deep

groundwater. Both soil and groundwater were extensively

contaminated by HTRW. Soil was impacted by concentrations of

TCDD, .pesticides, PCBs, PARs, TPH, and metals (see HTRW Site

Summary). Groundwater was also contaminated by chlorinated

solvents and metals. Once the exact location of the workshaft is

set, an extensive surface and shallow soil (up to 15 feet)

sampling investigation should be performed. This should include

approximately 10 subsurface, 15 surface, and 2 shallow soil t

boring samples. Samples should be analyzed for VOCa, SVOCs, /

Pesticides/PCBs, dioxin, metals, and TCLP for organics and

inorganics.

d) HTRW Response Alternatives

Construction of Workshaft 2B will generate quantities of

potentially contaminated groundwater. The known contaminants of

concern are primarily the chlorinated hydrocarbons PeE, TCE, DCE

and the metals iron, manganese, and zinc. Other compounds may

also be present and may become mobilized into the groundwater

recovered in the excavation. Analysis and, potentially,

appropriate treatment of the groundwater would probably be

required prior to its discharge.

A possible groundwater treatment system would comprise a

metals removal unit followed by a granular activated carbon (GAe)

adsorber. The metals removal unit would probably be of the type

HeM: ~0'l"1IIIPI- -.d by

USACE 8111~ DICIrct ~ i)III

• ....., d ....... nIIXI1 by IT CDrptnbO'l IV-29

TIERRA-A-017522
Table IV-A-6-1

Comparison of Field Investigation Analytical Results to Screening Criteria

Workshaft 29

Analyte R.sult Fresh Fresh FW-2 FW-2 FW2-NT FW2-NT

wat. Ca) wat. Cc) Emuent Emuent (h) (he)

Deily Monthly

Mu Avg

Haz Non Res Re. W.... Sol Sol

C .... I..

cation

BE (h) SE (he) BE BE Sol

EfIIuenI Emuent Impact

Deily Monthly 10 OW

Mu Avg

Sol

Mise

Water

Mise

2B-f-lT .pOO1 (S43~'3)

1,1,1·Tric:hIoroel8ll 8.« ~ 21 121 ~ 21

1,1.{)ich1oroehne '62 fill Zl 51 Z

1,l-Dich1oroelhene 4Q.4 E 4.81 2f 1E

Chloroform 183 lU 5.61 47e 4E 21

QossBeIa 5.1 50

Phenols 628 26 15 2000: 46Iri:ijj 26 15

Silver 099 41 5C 25 . 164

--

5( 2!:

039 429 56 Zl Telrachloroelhylene 136 16

- '--

109 ~

Trichloloelheoe 618· 54 _. - 81 21 ----,10 200 100 200 100 Zinc 252 120

---

2B.f-lT -PB01 C364-374)

1,I, 1·Trichloroelhane 763

----

5l 21 127 ~ 21

50! 5S Z! 1,I·Dichloroelhane 164 12

I, I·Dichloroelhene 357 6 048' 2': IE

Chloroform 202 IIA 56/ 470 46 --

-- -- 2'

Gross Bela 9'

-~

._----

82 -~12-- 50 -50 ----- Lead 176

---

10:: 5 100 --- -- Mercury 018 24 0.01 ---_. --- 1 014 0.15 I

----

24! 1&Xl 4() Melhylene chloride 0788 ._-- ~~------ 9.4 _.- B9

mx: 26

---~- ----_.

------

Phenols 548

----~-

26 15 46CXXXXl 15

039

----

-

L ____ • __ -"_._-- Tetrachloroelhylene '28. 16

-- - f-----.- ---_•.- 429 56 12 -lliS1--- --- -_. '------- - -_._---- Trichloroelhene f-----··· 642· 54

_ ..._----- -." . .-._- 81 54 21

2Q(

- ._--- ---_._. --~~- --_.

2lX IOC

---_.', -- .- -- ----- .- llnc 256 120 110 100 .. ~-,--_.~---~- ~_. ~'- _.. ~--~-

------ __L._~.L.-- "_ ..~ ---'-- ...._--- -

Alluntls in ppb

TIERRA-A-017523
Analyte Result Fresh Fresh FW·2 FW-2 FW2-NT FW2-NT

waler (a' water te' Emuent Ernuent (h) the'

Dally Monthly

Max . Avg

Hal Non Res

Wasle Soil

Classlft

cation

Res

Soil

SE (h' SE (he' SE SE

Emuent Emuent

Dally Monthly

Max Avg

5011

Impact

toGW

SoU

MI&C

Waler

Mise

,--- ~-~

Gloss Bela 55

-_. --- .--.-------- - 50

200JI 100::

~------~ ---- --- --- Iron 100

----- ------ 200C 100: f---

lead 91 8, 32 100 5C 5 1IX 5(

~60 -- Manganese 1IX -~ OJC _.._------

- -

Telrachloroelhylene 224 16 429 56 22

TI1ms-1,2-dchloroelhe

- ~-_._--- ------ -----_ ... --- -- --- --_.- 53 54 21 54 21 -- ~- ---- ---_. --~f----- -- --la;- -,_. _.- -- ------- ._._--- --- ------~.- Trichloroelhene 655 54 _._~~--~---- 81 54 21 --

121:

----- --~- ---100 _.~--- ------ ----.",. ----- ---- ._------- Zinc 390 110 200 -,'_.~---- ---~~. 200 IIX -- ._--_.- --- ---

2BF-4N-PW1.4J12

----------,,......----

Telrachloroethylene

-----

TrallS-1.2.dchloroel

Trichloroethene

• 2BF .. N-PW1.4J38

--

1,1·Dichloroelhane 599 J 59 22

Chlorcber1zene 452 J 28 i'

Telrachloroelhy\erll! 239 16

Trans·1.2.dchloroelhE 57 54 21

Trichloroelhene 743 54

-------- ._~-- -_ .. ---

-

5~ 22

22 2100: 2S 15

-

03S 42S 56 Z;

----~ ---

--

-~----- 54 21 -- I-----'i OC

-_' ____0.-

--- --- ----- ---

_____ ··L.

81 54 21 ----

________L ___.

- --- ----- -_. -- ---- ----- -

2BF..N.pWI-4f48 1~;~~~;~~=if_-_i~~61---~~_I_~~_]~ __-'i~ -~~-~~~J~-~!r J ---jAil uni1s in ppb

1 I.

I

I

.1

2

TIERRA-A-017524
Analyte Resun Fresh Frelh FW-2 FW-2 FWZ-NT FW2~T

watert.) w.lertc) Emuent Emuent th~ (hc~

Dally Monthly

Mall . Avg

Haz Non Re. Rea

Waste Sol SoIl

cla.sln

cation

SEth~ SECIte) SE SE Sol

Emuena Emuena In'1*:t

Dally Monthly to OW

Mal AYI

Soil

Mise

IT richIoroelhene

ZBF~-PW1-G'O

211

Chlorobenzene ".96. 2E 1~ Z1 21lXX 2E 1~

Tetrachloroe"""'" 23.\ 1E 0.31: ".2!l !if Zl

Trans·1,2«h1croeh 57.3 .~ 21 ~ 21

TricHoroelhene 730 5) 1.a: 81 ~ 2t

2BF -IN-PW1-34G

1, 1,1·Trittlb'oethane 782 S4 21 127 54 21

1,1-DichIoIoelhane 14 5S 22 59 Zl

1,1·Dichlofoelhene J 18 J E 481 25 1E

Chlortbenlene J 5JJ 2ll 15 .'12 211XXl 28 1~

--

Telrachlofoelhylene 235 1E OJ!; ".29 56 Zi

Trans· 1,2 -dchlofoelhe

--

635 5~ 21 5~ 21

Trichloroelhene 774 5 to!: 81 S4 21 ~

-S 2BK-FD-HA1

4,4prime-DD T 35 !lIXX 2CXXl !"roJlJ

Aroclor 1200 670 5lXXX 2OC( 40C !mXJ . ---

_.

Arsenic noo 200X 2CXXX:

47lXXXXX 70c0:x!

_.

Barium 55100)

-

..,-_. ~-

400: 500X

...~

Benzo(b )nuoranlhene 810 9:Xl

--

IlXX 1CXX --- Berynium 5JO

-- -- -- --- --- --

1--._-

---- ~s(2-elhylhexyl) phlh 420 _._-~ 210lXXl .. OCO:: 1(XXXX:

----- Cactnium 4500 100:xxJ ICXX

ooxxx: 6lXXXX

---- Ccwer 68XXXJ

----

2100XXlC IIlXXXX -- ----_._-.-

~ani<le .. __ .~_ 3500

-- --~- Fluoranlhene ~40 100::xxxx: 23lXXXX IlXXXX --- ------- -- -- r---- -_. .. - -- Gross Bela 19

-~----- -_--.!'!- -_._-- --

.__ .- .._- --' ---- ---- -_. -- soo:xx: -_.~ -- c----- -- ---- Lead 7rnm 100c00

---_._-- --. .. . -- ---~~~- ---------- ----

._--_ ...__ .., ...._._-- _ ... -- 27000: -~---. _._- -~---- -_._- ----

...__...-

Mercu'Y 1100 14000 _._,-_.-~ ._ ..-- .._-- .__._-

--- --- f--------- --- ._- ''''''--'---- - 25OOi) -~--~- -- ----- ------

._ .._~._--

--------- Nickel 277CXXJ 24OOO:Xl

- "--'---'-

.- ..._-"- --- -- --- -_... --- --_. _...- .__ .._----

·'70C00l -~-~ - ._- ..._- -_._-- ... _ .._-- -

ilXXXXl

-_~~.w_

F)Jene 490 llXXXXXXJ ~_.~--~---- -------- - -~---- - -_. _._-

------ ---- -._---- ------ ~-,_._ ..

All units in ppb.

3

TIERRA-A-017525
". / - _

Analyte Water

Mise

':.

2BK-FD.pBG1~O

E~f-----r=td R1SJ5; ,; I I I I I FA

Acelone

Arsenic

~------

Barium

Resun Fresh Fresh FW·2 FW-2 FW2~T FW2~T

water (a) water (el emuent Emuent (hi (hel

Dally Monthly

Malt . Avg

Haz Non Res

Wade Soli

Classln

cation

Res

Soil

SE (h) SE(he) se SE

Emuent Emuent

Dally Monthly

Mu Avg

SoIl

Impact

toGW

Soil

Mile

42 -IOCOOX l00x00 l00:xxJ ------- --~- --~ __ ~~n. _ _._--_ ...- ..__ ..__ .- -~-2OOXi -2Ci.XXj ~-_. 4200

- --- -_.- ---- --- --- -----.- _.. _.- ._----~~-

47<XXlOCK1

--- ._- -- 620ClJ 70C00J f------- --- --- _.. ---~--~- ,-.~- _u ___

lID 21<XXxJ 40000 l00:xxJ

-- --~--- -rom: -roxxij -

220Xl

--- _._-- -----_._. -

_.. _._- ._-------- ------- l00Xi:XX -- --- ._-

--- ---- --- ----

-_.

3JO _._- ._~,--- 5700XXJ Icon ---- --- ~--- ---- ~----- "-6iXXXi -- --- 12(XX) 10C00J

--- ._---------- - -- ---

___ ~T __ C

-

2HXX> 24OO:XXJ 2SOOlX ---- ---- ._-

7100:xxJ 37lXXX 2!ro)

52OOJL---_ 15CXXXX lSOOXX ~-_.~--

---- ..

&(2 -elhylhexyll phlh

C<wer

-----._,_._--

Din-butyl phlhalale

------~.- ---

Lead

---_.- -----

Nickel

Vanadium

Zinc

----7 2BK-GW-OB1

------- -- --- --- ------ .-_.-- -----_.._- ---_ .... --- ----- . _.,. ._. ~.

Acelone 12

---- - ---

~

--lro -- ioc 5C

-._._._-- --00;; ---

_ ..

0.14 100 ~

--- .- . .~--- ArseniC 16

--._--- ----~ --_. --- - --- _._- --_. .-- -- Barium 420 200J

---~- ------~-

I-------- 27 ...

10: 5(J

-- Jljj 100 5(J

---- Chromium (Iolal) 160

----,----_.- f----- --_.

10:: 5(J

-- --_.

100 5(J

---- Copper 29 18 12

--_.- •.._- -

-----~

pinos~_. 0.027 J

-

Gloss Beta 65 5(

m lOX 20l lOX

._---- Iron J3OO)

Lead 110 82 32 llX 5C 5 llX 51:

-

Iii ~--- ----

~nganese 1500

- ._1-.

--- -- Mercury 023 24 001 1 014 015 1

12l: 11( 2(X llX

---- ---

20C IIX

._-- ._-- Zinc I~

--_.

------~--- -~-_. . --

-?I~:~:~~F-~'ILl==I?J-21E~_=t=J~- -~'~I_=__J~_ -~E~~~L:.J _.--~j~~r--=~~-II=~-·-r

M~~~p~ I

4

TIERRA-A-017526
Analyt. R•• ult Freah Freah FW..z FW-2 FW2-HT FW2-HT Hu NonR •• Re. SE(h) SE (he) SE SE SolI Sol w... wat. Ca)water (el Emue'" Emuent Ch) (he' Wa"e Sol Sol EIftuenC Emuent In1*t MI-e Mlac Dally Monthl, Cia."" o.tIy Monthly toGW Malll . Avt cation Max Avt

IBariIm ~I I I I I 2(Xij

~

I I I I ,I I

1:-'" Q] ] 5~,{

~

I

~

8<~ 3.•~~ ~I I I I

ILead I 24J

I I I I 1CXij I~d' I 1~~~ ~ I I I j A J F=::6a:- I ~~1 ~ t I O·3!l1 I I I I 4.291 561~1_ r-

. .I

11~ ~

I I 1·lJ!l1 I I I I 811 S41-~1 I

ILIOC I IIU I lL\J1 1001 I I I I I I .~ 2OO1~1 r-

-+ 2BK-S-HAG1

I~' RFFFI I ~ -= I I I "::F

!Aroenic I~I -l-_-~__ I_t--I I j .1 ,.7;- ~ ~-----f--t Ih----~_____I

la:=~8:1 -~-! ! R-=i==='1': t~ I ;3==1---------.1

IBenzo(b)lIuoranlhene ~4OJ1 L ~ 11m OOJ! I I I mnl I

I~ryllium._ "-' _I -"'1-- 1 1-'--1 f---~ 100J ~ I I I i

I~~~~~~~-"'----T -'~FI '::: I I; I--\-- I~~~J_~~~I- ~~_-.-·~~_·_.+-~~n-_~~_--I=fii-:-!f::-l*1 :1---1- •

• ~ros_sA~ha LL_5_,

.L __... ~l_-~-~ ---··---r ! ~----I I I ~--~-

I

~S8ela 141--- ~1-----------r~-- -- ----l~' 60 ~.:, --~=- :::~--I-== ,- - -=::::::::::r -:: ~== --1 l' --f---=-. ~=--==-~--

tiid;;l·------ -,36OOJ ---- -------. .. --- ---- -~-- ---- 24OCOOJ 25OXO - - -- -- ----- ---- .------ .....

~r:.~_.~:_=~_~l~~-~_=~_.--- _ . ==:- - ~_~-~-=- -- =_= !~-5~roro -- _--~=~_=-=~'1~-~....-

Talai Pelroleum HyO'( 44lXXXJ ! .----- --- -.----. -~- --- . ---. -._-- -- - _ .. - -.---.-.--.------ ----,c-:-::-:: -.--. - ---- ---- .- ~- . . _,

Vana(jum 298O'J 710C00l 370c00

Zlr~ ----.--- -~!~-_-=___=__=_~-_~---~~===-=-~~=--__.-~--- .__---~~=_!~ ~-;mm~~- ~==-=- .~.----~-----

28K-S-HA02

All units In ppb

5

TIERRA-A-017527
Analyte Ruuh Fresh Fresh FW-2 FW-2 FW2-NT FW2-NT

water lal waler (cl Emuent Emuent Ih. (he.

Dally Monthly

Max . Avg

Haz NonRes

Wade SolI

Classln

cation

Res

Soli

SE Ih. SE (he) SE SE Soil

Emuent Emuent ImpKt

Dally Monthly to OW

Mu Avg

Soli

Mlac

Water

Mlac

4, o\prime-DD T 120 m 2lXX 5(XKXX

Anlimooy 37200 3-'OOX 1m

Aroclor 1200 JOCOD 5O:XJ( 2lXX « 500X

~enic 10500 2OOX: 200X

Barium ZlOXOO 47lXXXXX 7fXXXX '~-- -- --- -- ---

00: '-'-~ Benzo(lI)pyrene 1!ro IlXXXX -- -- _,.c _

~

_._.

Benzo{blnuoranlhene -4100 400: go:

--- ~-_._-_.- _. _.- ----- ----

100:

_._.~

Beryllium 870 100:

--_.--~ -_._-- -- --- ------ ._--- ------ llXXXX

_ ...._- -- --- -_.

Cadnium 1120CXl 1(0:

1------ ..----. --~' .. ------_. -----._" ._-- --6OOfi -roxri ~---_._- -- .. -~~---

C~r 15500))

------~-_. ---

_ .. .'-- ._- -- -_.'-- .- 3i~ _'iiiXID: --- --- --- -- --- --- ---~----- 9'~~ __ 2200

---

~. -

_. .- ._-------- _.- -_. ._- ._.-

GrossA~ 92 5(

f-.------ .._-- - - --

.. -- ----

._.__.

--- --~~-- ---

&J

-- Gross Bela 12

-- .---- _.

Lead 14&XXX) _._-~ a:m:x: IlXXXXJ

MereuI)' 5700 27lXXX: 14lXXl

Nickel 10&00) 24OO:KX 2500X - -

~_._-

3100:0: G::ro:

----_.- Selenium 1COO>

--

_._- .',-'._--" .- ---_.

-4100:0: 11lXXX:

._~~_._-

Silver 1800

-- .------- ------" Tolal Pelroleum Hy<t~ 99:XXXl

--

71oo:xxJ1 37lXXx: ---- Vanadum 49:lOO

linc 402CXXXl 15OOXX11 15OlXXX:

-..;> 2BK-5-flAOJ

Anlhracene 2200 1lXXXMX:q lo:xxxxxJ 1lXXXX:4

Antimony 39700 3-4IXXX 1m

Aroclol 1260 45COO 5O:XJ( 2lXX -49J ~

Arsenic 9!m 21m:: 200X

Barium 78lXXl -47l1lXXXX 700:0:

m 9X 5OCOO:

r-- Benzo(a}anlhlacene 4400

00: 66(

.- l00xx

._~ ._----- Benzo(alPyrene 4OCO

-4I.XX 00: ---- --5iXij ..,,- - --- Benzo{b)nuoranlhene noo

l00i -_.. ~-- --- --- -. Beryllium 440 10c(

-- -- ._--_.

10lXXX: 100J

_.._- ~~.- . ~-

Cadmium 12900 '-------_. ~~~--- .. ------. t ~--"_._-

All units In ppb. 6

TIERRA-A-017528
ANIlyte Result Fresh Fresh FW·2 FW-2 FW2-NT FW24l1T

w.ter (.) W8ter (el Emuent Emuent (h) (he)

08l1y Monthly

Mu . Avg

He Non Res Rei

W.ste Soli Soli

c .... 'n

e.tlon

SE (h) SE(he) SE SE

Emuent Emuent

0811y Monthly

M.ll Avg r

SolI

ImpIIet

to OW

SolI

Mise

W8ter

Mise

C1lrf'ene 4100 «XXXI !KXXlI 5OOXX:

Cqlper 71l6OO) mxx: Em:OJI

FkJoranthene B200 IlXXXOX 2mXXlI 10JXX

Gross~ 6.3 I 5(

Gross Bela 21 I a:

Lead 95!00) lmXX IlXXXXlj

Merwy lXO 27lXXX 1«XXlI

Nickel 4mxl 2«XXXX 25lmlI

Pyrene fro) 1lXXXOX 170lXXX)j 1~

Selenium 1500 311XXKX 6:mlI

SiI'ief 1300 41lXXXX1 11lXXXl\

Total Pelro/eum Hyrtc 38CX.ro) I

Vanadum 76(0) 710lXXX 370CXX)j

Zinc 1700:xxJ l500XX '5lXXOO1

..--?' 28K-S-MAIJ.4

Anlimony 21400 3400X 1400Jl

Aroclot 12ro 12OOX) 50»: 2IXX 40C 5CKXX

Arsenic 9300 2lXXX 200X

Barium 18oco:x> 41(XXXXX 70lXXX

Benzol aIan lhracene 2100 40CX 00( ~ 5CXX)()(

66C 66( IOJXX Benzo(ajpyrene 2200

BenzO(b)nuoranlhene 500J 400: !XX) _._-_. _. --~~

5()(XX

- -~~ ---

HXX 1001 BeryHium 710

---~- --- -~-- -

---

2100x l00J0C

_._- Bis(2~lhylhexyll phlh 7600 40CXXl

--- ---- -- ---- --~- -100xx ---~ ~-

-- ----. Cadnium 11200 HXX -------- -I--.~~ f--- -~- f--.---- ---

_.

ro:xxx ._ ..~ Cower

__ T_~ __ ._._, __

l:xroxl OCOXKJ f--.--- --- -- '-- --- ~.- -"- ._- .- .- -

'-'-- .

Cyanide 2300

'- _.- 2100:xxx ll00xx

---

",0c00::

-._- -- Fluomnlhene 3700 l00:xxxxJ 2lXO)) ~-_.,~-~ ------ --_. ---- ----- _._-

---- --_. _._-~~~ ----- __u_~_

Gloss Bela 11 ._-&

---_. -- .. ---- ----- ----. ----- ._~ ~--- - --- --~ -- -----_ .. ---6iXro: -~-_._---- --_. ------- ----- .. -- -'--~-- .. Lead lDOC«'O IlXro) _ •. L_

- ----- ---- .. ----_. -- -_ .._-- -~._,---~--- -~ .. _-- ----- ~-- ~---.- .~ ~_.- -- ._~-- - - .._---._._. .. Mercury 3800 2700Xl 1400)

- --. ---_.- --- -~---- ---- .._- --'--

-~--- _. - ~--- - - -~-. -- --- _._---- .- ._--,-_._-- -- -. ._ .. .. tldel 9J3())J 24OCOCO 2500Xl

.._-- ---- - _ .._----~ --- - .. - ..- -- .-

.__ ..

..- -'-._-_.- .. - --~ .. -~.~~-

All un~sIn ppb

TIERRA-A-017529
Analyte Result Fresh Fresh FW-l FW·2 FW2-NT FW2-NT

waler (a) wOller (e) Ernuenl Effluent (h) (he)

Dally Monthly

Max . Avg

Haz Non Res

Waste 5011

Classln

utlon

Res

5011

SE (h) SE (he) SE SE

Emuerrl Emuent

Dally Monlhly

Max Avg

Soli

mp.d

toGW

Soli

Mile

Water

Mile

-

Pyrene _ .. ____ 100:0: 4400 l00:xxxxJ 170C00J

~_.-

SeIeoium 1700 310C00J 6'.ID:J

~----- .. -

Silver 1500 4100X(J . 11lXXXJ

Tolaf Pelroleum Hycic 2100XXl

Vanactum 14700:> 7100::xxJ 370c00

-_. J~ --- ZInc 26XCOO 15OOXlO -----~-- ~ -- --

2BK-S·HA05

.. - -------- ~--------~,,,- -_ .. _-~ --_ .... - .- - -- ------ ~ --_._----. - ---- ----_. --- -.-

2,3.7,8-TCDO 5,5

- ---------- - ~ ~------ -~ --- -- ---- ._(

---- 4.4pIimeDDD 470 1200:) m .'

- -----_.- ----~ ------ - ---,- ---_._---- -~-- -_..- -.. .._----- ----~-

500X -~--

2C(X 5OO:x:

--- 4.4pIime·DDE 1100 OCOO - -------- --- .._..- ----- - -- -- -- -~------ ----- ---_._- - -- ~~ T'~ ._-- ._.

-

4. 4pIime·ODT 280 OCOO 200J 5lXXXX: -~------'- .._- ------- -

_._. ------- --. --- ~--- ---_. -- _._- .._.

14t.XXJ

-_._-

Anhmony _._--

263COJ 34<XXXl

--- - -_._- ---- - -- ._--- ------ --_._--

--~

-~~

--400 ---_.

Aroc\ol 1200 OX} 5lXXXJ "._-- -_.. ...- -

_. --~~- -. --~._--_ ..,- _.~.-- ---- --~-

ArsenIC 5200 2CXXXJ 2CXXXJ

-----_ .. --_._- _._-_ .

.. .._._-_.- --- --- -~ ~ ~--- 1-----

Barium 2440000 4700J000 7lXXXXJ

--~---- I--- . ..

8enzo{b)flUOlanlhene 3m 4lXXlI 000 500X ------~~ -- --

Berylfium 1500 lOOl\ 100:

-~-_._-- -~--- -- ----

Cadmium 14m tcrox 100:

---- ---_.- - - --- ---- -- - --~- -~- _._- - ._- _.

1-----

Ccwer 91400:>

--~

60000C ---_. __ ._-- .. - -- ---- ~---~ -_. -- _. ----~- --- - -- --- --- li~ ~------ ._--

- -'_..- - .._-- ~-.

Cyanide t200 ~lcococ(

----- -------- --_._- 1-- ------ -- -- ._---- - - -------~ _~n_~~. ------ -- _. "- ._.

-

Gross Alpha 7 1

---- -~ - ----- ~--- -~-_. ----- _.._-- -~"- --- ---~~ ---- ---_. --- "-- -~.

Gros~ Bela 14 6(

---_._--------- --

_.

--

...~. ._- -_ . .-

&XXXXl 100::xxJ

---- lead 47~

-~_.--._--_. -"-~ --- ._- .._---

Mercury 3800 27lXXXJ 14t.XXJ

------_.-

24OOXX1 2f.(OOJ

_.

Nickel 416lXXJ

-~--- --

JCXX:OOX - ._-----

Tolal Petroleum Hyetc 1nKXXJ

--

_.

71crox

-- ------ ---- --- Vanactum 943CXXl 370c00

1500XX 1500XX

_._- ----_.- --._-_.

Zinc 1940000

---_._- ._--

-- --,--._~-

i~

- -~~'-'-"---r--I~.. --~ - ----- - -~--I--~·--- -... --- -- ----

~ 200:)

-- --~- - - ---- - --- -- -- - ~~

--- -- - - - ~---- -

I

8

TIERRA-A-017530
AnalyCe Resun W~er

Mise

Fresh Fresh FW-t FW-t FW2~ FW2-NT

water (.) w"er (e)Emuent Emuent (h) (bc)

D.lly Monthly

Mu . Avg

Hu NonRes W.... SoH

CI .. &It1

cation

Rea

SoIl

SECh) SE (he) SE SE

Emuenl EI'IIuent

o.lIy Monthly

M.. Avg

Sol

........

IoGW

Sol

MI.:

Antimony 74700 3«XXX 1m

Arsenic 1l8Xl 2aXX 200X

BarUn 1740000 41tXXXXX 70000:

gefyIlml 400 lax too:

Bis(2-41hy1lexy1) phth 15/XXl 21CXXX GXX 1CXXXX

Cachilm 291m 100D 100:

Ccpper 148lXOl eaxxx: exxxx

Cyanide 3100 21lXXXXXJ 110000:

Gross Bela 15 s:

lead 1850000 e:xxxx: 1(XXXX

Mefcury J200 270c00 1400:

Nickel 216(0) 24lXXXXJ 2f£OO(

Selenium :mJS 31lXXXXJ 6X(J(

-

Silvt!! 16100 ,mIDXl 11<XXXJ

- -

Tolal Pelroleum Hyclc 2400:00

----

Vanadium 1nxxl 71lXXXX 3100x

Zinc «a:m 15OOXX: 15lXXlOO\

-

----7' 2BK-$-HA07

4,4prime-DDE 7nxJ

--f----- --

4, 4plime-DDT 9400

--- --

Antimony 41300

Arsenic 8500

---

Barium 27(00))

--~----- 1---- ---- ~-

Benzo(b)nuoranlhene 1500

f-------~

Beryllium 520

------- ---

Cadmium 66100

-------

CCflPer 25O:XXXXJ _._-_._----- ---

Cyanide 7800

--~------,----

-4700E

---- -~--

Din-butyl phlhalale

~---------,----

Dielhyl phlhalale 1200

----~~~--I----~- --- ~-

GlOSS Alpha 84

---- -" ---_._- 1-------

Gloss Bela 14

-~----------'-----

All unils In ppb_

!XXX 2COOI 5IXXXJ

--- --

!XXX 2OCO\ 5lmXI

---

3400X I~

----

2oo:x: 200X

470000)] 70000: --

-- 1------------

WJ 90C

-

500X

-- --

-

100: HXX - --- ----

- ~-

1~ -100: 1------- --- ~--

-- - --- I----------

ro:xxx -&iXii: --_.. -----

-- --

210c00x l100XXJ ---_ ..- ~---

- ----_.~ -_.._-- -_._----

10xr0x

----- ---- -1OOii ----_. --- _._---

-- -- -- ----,-- ----

_...

570000c

-~- ----- --~------ ---

~-~

.-=--~ -----

-- I---~~- -~~----~ ~~~--,-- --- --- --,-,._-- ~----- --

- --- ~~-- -~~ -----~ ----- _ ...._--- --~ ~---- -- ----- ----_.

50

fiJ - - --- --~- ._----- ---~ -~-- ---- ---.- - -..'- -------

9

TIERRA-A-017531
Analytl! Rnull Fresh Fresh FW-2 FW-2 FW2-NT FW2..NT

water (al watl!r (cl Emul!nt emuenl (hI (he)

Dally Monlhly

Max . Avg

Haz NonRes

Waste Soli

Classln

calion

Rei

Soil

SE (hI SE (he. se SE

Emuent Emuent

Dally Monthly

Max Avg

Soli

Impact

to OW

Soil

Mise

Water

Mise

-- -

--~~

Lead 1:n:xxxKl

---

6OOXX) 10cID --

~ercu~t ___ J600 27lXXXl 1400:

---I---

Nickel 285CXXJ 24OCOX 25OCO:

Selenium 4OCOS 3 HXXOO ImJ(

Silver 6600) 41()(XXX) 11lXXX ---~-~~ - ---- -----

rolal Pelroleum Hylto 5!mXl

--------- --

- --- -~- 710c00c 37lXXX Vanadium 11500)

--_ ... -- --, ..__ ..

---- ---------- ---- --~--

ZInc 81100)) 15OCO.Xl 1500.«

._----

____~L- ____

--7> 2BK-S-HAOI

------_. -_.- -- --------- -------~--

4,~imeDDE 400

~~

------~---- -- -_.- 5OCO -- ..... _. -- --._.~-- ----2Oj ---

..

-

4. 4prime-DD T ~

---- ------

5lXXXX ---- ---- - --- ----

__ OC(() . _____

--- --- -- Anhmony 57100 J4OC(lJ. 1m ----_._-- ----- --- --- ---

Al1enic 5600 2lXXx: 20CKX ---~-~----- --- --

Barium 27400Xl 47lXroX 70lXXX

Benzo(blnuoranlherll! ~-~-500 «XX !lXJI 5OOJ(

--- -- --- -

2100)( 400lJ tlXXXX Bis(2 -elhylhexyt) phlh 810

-------- --_._~- -- ---- - - - -- --- Caanium 85200 1()(XXX) llXXl ------~- ~.- -- -._-

.__.

--~ ._------- ---

600XXJ

---- ---- Cower 55400XKl 6OOXX)

--~._--~-,--,._----- ---- -_.__ ._-- --~ ----- -'--_ .. - - ....

11iXijj) Cyanide ----- -- ------~ 6100 210lXXXXJ -~~---_._- ._--- --_.- -_._,. ---

lCOO:XXX: lOOlXXlOO 5OO:xJ Diethyt phlhalale HXXJ ---

f-------- -- ---

6C Gloss Bela 12

-. - --~ ..- --

._----~

Hexachlorooenll!rll! 860 200C 600 10c0x -~

a:ro:x l00xx lead 707lXXXl

2700)( lmJ --- !'1e1cury HXXJ

.-

IJickei 30\(00) -- 2400XXJ ~ -

Selenium 2200'S 31lXXXX1 ImJ(

41()(xxx) 11lXXX Silver 35400 --

- -_._- --- Tolal Pelroleum I-Iyltc 47lXXXl

t----sWJ 37OO:X:

-- --. "---- ---~. Vanadium 71()(XXX)

-- 1---- ~-- -- - --~

15O:XXX

~-

I

---- ---_.'- --_. --- Zinc I 743OCO) 15OCO.Xl

.- - - ------'---- '------- '----- ---_.

-- ._~L ____ .._.

[--[--l----~--I-i~:

--- ----.-__ __ _ ____."""""l/_

fa

TIERRA-A-017532
Analy1e Relult Frelh Frelh FW-Z FW-Z FWZm FWZm

water la) water leI Emuent Emuent (h) (he)

0.11)' Monthly

Mu 'Avg

Hal Non Re. Re.

W.st. Sol Soil

Clualn

cation

Seth) SE (he) SE SE

Emue'" EIIIuent

0.11y Monthly

Mu Avg

Sol

.-npact

toQW

Sol

Mite

Water

Mlec:

2,3,7.8-TCOO 4.3 I

(

4,~e-OOE 6JOO m ~ ~

4,~T Em) m 2m 5CXXXXt

Acen8phlhene 2000 1~ J«mX 1~

Antimony 42200 ~ 1m

Arsenic lfBX)S ~ 20lXX

Berium 23200000 4~ 700lXX

Benzo(a)aolhlacene 4200 ~ !KX soon:

Benzo(aPirene 8100 600 ~ l00xKJ

Benzo(b)nuoranlhene lJOOJ 4000 001 500XJ

Benzo(g, h ,i)pefylene J600 5OOlOC

Bis(2-elhylhexytl phth 1500 21~ 4!KXXJ l000x

Ca<tnium 93700 1~ 1001 ~ ..~ --_. ------ -

Clvysene 42CQ ~ 900: SOOXX -.

Copper OCOXOO ~ scoco::

---~.~ ~---

Cyanide 28CX1 210001XXl1 110c00:

DlJenz(a,h)anlhracen l30J ~ 6& UXXXx:

~.

Dielhyl phlhalate 4400 IlXXXJOC( l00:xxJ0( 5000C ----~--- f..-.----- -~~-- ---~ - - --- -_.

IlXXXJOC( Zl(OO)( FkJoranlhene J600 locm: 1---- .·w·_ ..•... ,.,f-~-- ---- -~~ -_. ---- ---

.._. -

~

--- Gross Alpha 11

1---_ ..----. ~.~~ --- c--- -_ ..

..-

GlOSS Bela 18 9:

-------- 1---- .- ~-- -_.~---

200( 66l 1<XXXX:

~_.-

Hexach~obenzene 5400

-- ------~---- ~- ~-----.._--- -_.~~ -- ----- 1------- -------- ---- Indeno( 1,2,kdJpyren 3600 4OC( !XX: 5O:XXX:

lead' ---- --- -- -- ~----- -- -_._------

lilXOX lc.xxxx: -- --_.._- 724(((()

~._------ _.- ----- -- --- --_ . ._-_. --- ~-- .~.. -

27000( 1m ---- -~~--

MelCUfY 3700

I---~-- _.1--- ._-- .__.

f-------- ._- -~._._.._- ----- -,------- .. 24I.XXXX ---- --~ .. -- --- .-

Nickel 233IXXl 25IJOC( _._.

-- ..- -- --,-~~_. ._--, -----_. ----,_._- ------ - _._~ .

-- .._-- -- ~-lOO:XX -- _.

Pyrene 4800 IlXXXXXlO 170000:J

-- .. ---- f---._- 1----- ._----- -----_. 1----. ~-~- ~-~ -----

3100xx -6JOOJ -~- ._-- .. ---_. _._--- ...

Selenium 4500

--_._---- -- - --- -~ --- --- f--.-- ------ -- - --- ---~ --

~._. --- -- .._.._- ~_._--

Silver 187COO 411XXXXl IllXXXl __ 4 _______

- -._- --- ---- _._-~ f---~-- --- ---- -----~ -- ----~ ~~~_. ._,._--- -- ---~ --_._- -. .. ---_._--

T olal Petroleum HycJ-( 45COOJ

•• _____ T_. __ _._._-_. ---

_.__ ._~--

----- -- -----_ .. _- --

_____ T ___ ~

..

_n" __ •

7100:0: ---- ---. .~.,,-, - .. ~ ---------- _. _.- .. - ---~ Vanadium l55OCO 37COOJ

---- - - --- ._-_._.- --- -- ------ --~~-_. -~-. .. --- .. -- ._-- ... -.. , .- -~ --- --------- --- --. -_. .._~ .

ZlflC IOI0000:J Isro:xxJ If.OO:XX)

_. ---'------- -- - _. - '--~-~. '----- c ... _. - n~_.,·' .• __ • .. --- ._- --~._---- ..- - -- --- --- .._---- -_ ..

--

.. .. ----~

All lIllits in ppb

11

TIERRA-A-017533
"n;tlylro Result

Wall!r

MIse

rrellh rrl'sh FW-2

w.-ler 1'-' w.-ler (el Ernllrnl

Daily

Max

FW·2

E,"UI~nt

Monthly

. Avg

FW2-NT FW2-NT

(hI (he)

";tZ Non Res

Wasle Soli

Clusln

calion

Re~

Soil

SE (hI SE (hel SE

Ernuent

Oaily

Max

SE

Emuent

Monlhly

Avg

5011

1mpl!Ct

toOW

Soli

Mla.c

2BK-S ..HA 10

---- _.,----

V.7.B-ICDD • 0

Vof'fimeDDE

-------

4.·~rllme·DDI

-_._--

Alllimmy

i\1~rnoc

--

Ihll\J111

- ----

£'.t"ylllul11

C'.fldl11Urn

CCH'('1

Cy.lm<!r

('"l'r"';~ Pol-I;,

I \('~Jchlol<t,~"zene

lr.ld

MrlwlY

N'ckrl

Selenium

S,tvrl

. -

I "I~t rl'lr('l('um llyd!c

V,,"~dllJlll

Zinc

-~- ------ ---- ,----.- ..--Ii

--~-- -~~

7OOC'O

410l'O'X.

10C'0

10CQ1J

TlXW..'

7 HXXXXO

55

270C1J

--- --- --- ----t-----I

:oxo

---- ._-- .~-- - ---- --- -_..- •.-

34·1('()

7CeO

:DOl\~Xl

~

~nco

nH)J'()

],.iXJ

11

l-1roXl D

94COOXJ

1-100

tOIC('()

lBOOS

7~IOO

1~

'09:00

32GCOOJ

I

(

I 2CCO 5OC« I

, 2COJ

1-- 5OCOO:---- 1-----

I

140C() ;

-- .- ----" --- ---- - -------

I 700"])

-- -- .--- --- ----- -~------ --- -~---- - --.- 700'X'0

---- ----- --'- -- -- ----- --- --- --- ------- 1COJ

.. - .- - -- - --_0_- - --~ _._---- -_.- -- -

1000

- -- .. ---- - .~-~ --- --- --~-- -~--- 6C((W.X)

- ---

.• , -- -- -- _._- ~-- ~-- --- lCO:X:O

- - --- ---..---

.._~~ - -

-----~

-- -- .

-

- -- - ------ ----

=--100»:

- ~ - - 6GO

-- .- ...- .. -,.-.'_.~~ -_._~-- ~--- - -~--- 1IXXXXJ

._-- - - --- - ,

..._- ~-- ~j- --~ .- -0'

~

---- ~~--- -- I

--- -- ... -

25O:XX.l

--- --- ----.- --

--~

_.- -- 63COO - --- - - - -

-- '- 1 IOCOO

--- ---

- --- --- --~. ---- -_. ... -

--.._--_ ..~ - -- ---- ---- --~- --- -

370c00

---_. ----- - ~ --- --- --- ---- -

.. 150000)

-- --- -~~---

2OC(l

6I.XXXXJ

21or:m

2400:xxJ

3 HXXXXJ

41CXXXXJ

7100XXl

--------

l50XXXJ

2BK-S·W\11

lt~~1~55- -.=0 3~-~===== -~-~=~l .~ t ]==- ---+---1f----+-~_l

t~~~6l,~ ;; ~ ~~ == - r I 1,1 ~==----t-- --------+--+---l---

~;~~~~=r~nl:~ne__1:~__~__=.=__:~ ==-=tl--j-'1-1-~---~ -:__=:

Cc-w:'~ .. _ .. ~~ ~ ._ ~_ __ __. ~ __6O:XXXJ _.~ .__ _ _ _ ~ _

Cya n1ch! 5100 2100:0:xJ IIIXXXXJ

--- ---- --- --- ._---, --- ----- --- ._..- -~~~- - -- --- ------ ~--- - ~-~---~- - -

All units i'l ppb. i -

I

12

TIERRA-A-017534
Analyte Wlter

MIle:

Result Fresh Fresh FW-2 FW-2 FW2-NT FW2.NT

water (a) wlter (c) Emuent Emuent (h) (he)

Dilly Monthly

Mill . Avg

Haz Non Res

Waste SoU

Clusln

cation

Res

Soil

SE (h) SE (he) SE SE Soil

Ernuent Emuent Impact

DIIII, Monthly 10OW

Mal A'll l

SolI

MIle:

Gross8e1l 7.3 I 00

Hexachlorcbenzene 6«l 2lXX 600\ 1~

Lead 428XOO tmXX 100D:

T0111 Pelrolet.n Hya< 42\XX}

V8ll8(iun 379Xl 71lXXXX 37000:

Zi1c 93tOCQ 15lXXXX ~

~ 2BK-S.ftA12

4,4prime-OOT ~ m 2lXXJ !iCXXXq

Anlimony 55!m 3«XXXI 1m

ArserIIC 6100 2OO:XJ 200XJ

Barium 242(00 41(XX)JOO 7COXX1

Beryllium 9100 100: 100;

-------- 1---'_- ~~-- _._-- --- --

10000: 100; Cadmum 2J5OO

C~r

-~--------

2410c00

---_.. - - ." ._-- ._-- --- r-- ~- fmXX 6OOXX: --'-'-- --- '--

.-- -

21lXroXJ l1cmxJ Cyanide no

~--_.- _._- --_. -----~

&J Gross Bela 14

--- ~.

&:XmJ lCOXXI lead 564(0)

Mercury 310

1----- .---- 27000: 1m

f-- 70:no 2400))] 2500XJ Nickel -~-

- -

41000JC 11000: Sitooer 5l:XJ --- ._--

----- .-

Tolal Pelroleum Hyde 2400XXXl

Vanadium 6OJOO

---- -- -- .. _-- 71COOX 370c00 -------~-- '-~ --_.

1500XXl

_ .. line 202OCOO -~- lflOOXl L ______

._- -- ---'~--'-. -----'--.-

--~--,- ------

2BK-S-HA13

- _._-----~

4. 4prime-DOT

-- --- .__ .~,----

Antimony

- ._- ~ --_.,_._-

ArodO! 1260

ArseniC

B.1rium

Caoollum

Cewel

Cyarude

All unrts in ppb

100

15WXXl

--- --- ~---

7400

------ ----- --

1«0

- -- ---'- ---

4010c00

B9200

---- -

203OCOJ

720

- .--- ~---t---t

/----_. ----

2OC()

f--~---t----I

1

400

2OCOJ

--- ----- --~

70X0J

--~~- ----

1000

~_._----~~

ooxm ---- _._---

11

---+-----1--- ----~ ----

13

TIERRA-A-017535
Fresh Fresh FW·Z FW-2 FW2-NT FW2-NT

water (al water (c) Ernuent Emuent (hI (he)

Dally Monthly

Max . Avg

Analyte Result Itaz Non Res

Waste Soli

ClasslR

cation

Rei

Soli

SE (hI SE (he) SE SE

Efnuent EmlHlnt

Dally Monthly

Malt Avg

Soli

Impact

toGW

SoU

Mise

Waler

Mise

~. - - - - ~.

GlossA~a 6 7 5(

- _._---- ---- _._-

--- ~.

Gloss Bela lJ

------_._-~ & -- --- --- ---- -_.- --- ._----

lead 65200XJ 6OCOOJ lroxx -------- --- ~. ._-_._-- --- -- --- -_._ ....

Mercury

- ~------_._~ ~~---

IJO:J

---_ . . -

27lX.XX 1~ -- -' - -

.. .- ._-----" -- -

Nickel InroJ 24OO:OJ 25OC« . ._------ _.~-- --_. ... .. --- -- --- --- -- ---

... ----_.- ---~ -.'5300: ----- --- --- Selenium 6700S 3100:xxJ

Tolal Pelroleum

- ------ - ---

Hyaa

- ----- ---- --- f----. --

.. ------ --- --- '100XXl

- -_._----_._~- --- --_. - .. --~-~- --_. -- ----_. _. _.-. ------ ------

23C«

--~._- ..

,<xx --- --- Tlie hloroelhene 77 54ro:J --~~----_._----_.- ---- - --- - -- .- --- ----- .- ---- --- -"37OOX Vanadium ilmXl --- ---- -- --- 7100:xxJ ..

-- --------- --_ ... -_. __ .

.. -_ . ._-_ . ... - -~- -.

_0 ___ - ._- _._---- -- "i5iIDX --- .

~--- --- line 27:nx:xJ 15(XX(X)

.. _.- ---- -

._.

- - -- -- - ~~~_. -- ---_._-

-..;> ZBK-S-OBI-42

----_.- ---_._----

eOOO 3

.'- ---- - - -- ----

e·OOE 15

- .- -~_.---

e·OOT lJ

----_. _._- -----

lhene 500

-~~-- - ---

50

~~~- .. ..- .- ----

J6

--- .. - --- --- ---- --

ene lJO:J J

----- - --

1016 280

-~-- .. ._--- ---

1248 720

--------- ---- -

1254 360

~~~._._.- _.

---

-_.

1260 320

--_._--,-- -

3100

---~ -- -----

711lXXl

----- --- --

a)anlhracene 3200

.- .

a)pyrene :roJ

l"uoranlhene J600

--

g,h.i)peryk'ne \700

---~~~

kjnuoranlhene 3100

.~--------- -

_.

-- ._---

lhylhexyl) phlh 330 J

---- -~ ------ -.- --~--_ ..

nzyl phthalale 160 J

------_._-- - -- --~~.- --

m 1200

-~--- - ------- ----- -

-,_ ..

-

4.4pllm

4.4p/lm

4.4p/lm

Acenaph

Acelone

Ald"n

Anlhrac

ArodOf

Arodor

ArodOf

AroclOf

Arsenic

Baflum

Benzol

Benzol

Benzo(b

Benzol

Benzol

Brs(2-e

Butyl be

Cadmiu

- ------- -_.-----

--- ----

--=..:~--~=_l--_+--_1_--I_---_1_--===_=!_--. --

---_.

~ -- ~- _. -----

- --_ .. _. ~---- ._--_.. _. -

-~- .._-+----::.,..--+

----------

-----+--_. ---- --

--4--- ----4-"':":"'~

------j----+--- -,~--I---

,----1-----+---- ---. --

All units In ppb.

I---+----f --._-

--_.~-

--

~-

-_.-._._~

.._- .... -

14

TIERRA-A-017536
Analyte Water

Mise

Fresh Fresh FW·2 FW·2 FW2-NT FW2-NT

water Ca~water Cc~Effluent Emuent Ch~ Chc~

Dally Monthly

Mall . Avg

Haz Non Res Res

Waste SolI Soli

Classln

cation

SE Ch~ SEChc~ SE SE

Emuent Emuent

Daly Monthly

Mu AvO

Soli

In1pIld

toGW

SoH

MI8c

Chrysene JCOO «XXX mlj sam:

Cower 47500 EIXXXX tmnlI

Dilenz(a,h)an1hnK:en 920, Ea: 660 1lXXXX

Diektin 8.7 1III 42 scm:

Encm 32J 31lXXX 17(0) 5lXXXJ

FIuoranIhene 7fm 1tmXXX zn:xm 1lmXl

FkJofene 500J 100QXX mmJ 100D1

gamma-BHC (lindane 15 22(X 52(J 5CXXXI

Gross Alpha .. 00

Gross Bela 20 OJ

HEplachlor 58 6!i( 150 500lX

Indeno( 1,2,J.cdJpyren 1700

---

m 9:XJ 500XX

Lead 25&:XXl soo::xx 1!XmJ

----

Mercury 650 27lXXX 1400; ---,_ ..-

520lXXlC 2e<ro: 500lX Methoxychlor IIJ

1----- -_.~-,

Methylene chloride 3B

--

21lXXX .oox tin

Naphlhalene 170 420lXXlC 2lXXX IOCXXX

Nickel 22lXXl 2«XXlXl1 2500XJ ------~ ~---~_.-- ~--

ICOOXXXl 170000: 1~ Pyrene 5llOO

--~------_ .. _._--

loo:mJ 100000: 5oo:XXJ Toluene 1 J

.,.- -_._-~ I------

Vanadium moxJ 710lXXX 37000:

--------- ------_.-- f-----

Zinc 47!mJ 150000: 150000: _._._-, -- ._----

2BK-S"()B1~4

'4,4prime.DDO ~-~- ----20 .---.--- ----

-.--------. - -- -- -- ---- J---t---- --+--~ I-~- I-~-_J---+___-

4,4pnme-OOE 12

4.4Prime-OOT --------71 ---- -----

---------- ------ ._--

Acenaphlhene 1200 J

--~-------.-- ---l----j

Acelone 89

---- ----_.,-, .- ~-------_.~ ------" -~---_ .._-- ----- ---- --_. --

Aktin 45

-~--_._~- .' .. ---- ------ .._--

Anthracene 1800

-- --~-- --- --- _._- ------

~r~im()ny~ 1(0) __ ~_ __ _ ._.~ _

AfOClor 1248 1400

---1---+--1---=":4~-==+---1---1---1---+-'::':'=+ __ 1

All units in ppb.

-_._-----+---~--

----~ ---- 1----+

··_---~~~I

I

15

TIERRA-A-017537
Analyte Resuh Fresh Fresh FW-2 FW-2 FW2-NT FW2-NT

water (al waler (cl Effluent Effluent (hI (he)

Dally Monthty

Milt . Avg

Haz NonRei

Waste Soli

Ctanln

calion

Rea

Soil

SE(hI SE(he) SE SE

Effluent Emuent

Dally Monthly

Max Avg

Soli

Impact

10GW

SoIl

Mile

Water

Mile

::'::~'=::':':'-.-----l---=--l--~.~ -----~ ---1----1--- _

10000c

------- --- ----f--------- --- .. 5OOC(

50000C

loon

5OOC(

5OOC(

loon

'OOXC -- --- --- ---+----~---_I___--l--~ ~----

--+--~!--~+---I--8J:::j -------- ----1---_. --.-

_.- --- ---1----1

All units in ppb_

--~--~ loon

--- --- -_ ... __ ._~-- -- ---_..

--~ ------_. L ._. __

115

TIERRA-A-017538
Sol

Mise

R.sult Fr.... Fresh FW-2 FW-2 FW2-NT FW2-NT

water (a»w.ter (el Emuent Emuent ChI (hel

Dally Monthly

M... 'Avg

Haz Non Res Res

Wast. SolI Sol

Ct.-sin

cation

SE (h) SEehe) SE SE

Emuent emuent

Dall, Monthly

M... Ayt

Soil

ImpKt

loGW

-;:> 2BK-S-PB01-41

Bari\m 12(0)8 47lXXXXXJ 10DXl

Bis(2-ethy11exy1) phth 79BJ 21lXXX1 mIl llXXXQ

CClA* 500) EDxxx: QXXXX]

0HW:lUIyI phlhalalt 320J ltXKXXXX: 570DXJ llXXXQ

Di-n-ocIyI phlllalate 81BJ ltXKXXXX: llOOXXl 1~

Lead 9-400 EDxxx: lOOXXl

Nickel 9900 2«mlC 250000

Vanadium 8600 71lXXXX 3700))

linc ~~ 2400J 1500lX 15(XXXXJ

--7' 2BK-S-PB01:~~O

Barium

Be'YlIium

---~-- ~

Bis(2-i!lhylhexyt) phi

COWI!f

O;-n-butyl phlhalale

Gloss Alpha

.~--_._-

Gloss Alpha

-----_ ..

Gross Alpha ~-_.- ---

Gross Bela

----

Gross Bela

---~

Gloss Bela

---~---~ -

Lead

~---

NiCkel ~~~--~ ~-

Vanadium -._._--~-

Zinc

..-- ~ ---- ---

47lXKXXX 700000 l3OCOJ

- -- ----- --- ----~

100: 100::

-- 610

-~-- -- ---- ----

2100x moc h 63. llXXXX: -

1500> 600JIX 6OO)X

-

00. ltoo:XXX 571XXXX: llXXXX: f--. ~~-- --

50 ~-- 59

--- ...'-- - ~~ -_... ~--- -------" -.~._._-----

50 -~---- 1

------- .~~- -~ -- --- . -~ --- .- --- --- -

~

-- 7 5

--~~-- --_._- --_. ----,- -_._--~~ --- --- -- --- -ff ---- J6

--.----. --- -_ .. -----~-- ------- ._.- --~ ----- --~- ._- f---~-- -----_. --- ---6i: ---- 4J

-_.. -- ~------ -- ---- _. -- ---- ._-- --- -~~ --- 44

- --- ---- --~- ._- -- - -~- .. ---~ ~--- 1500> 600JIX 1<XX:OO --_.- -_.- f----

2400XXJ 2SCOX ~-------_ .... 2HXXl

----- --~- ---- --- --~_. ._-- -

11CKXXXJ

--- ~-- -_.-~

.-•.__

3OCOJ

.- 370C0J

--- ----

-~_. _ ..- --~- ~--_.- _ ..,------ _._--~ ---~--- ._-- ._.. ---- -~-- 5HXXl ~ l500XXJ l5OCOOJ

- -~-~~- ~-~ ---------- --~- - - -

_.~ ---- -~ ---- ._- ._- ~-- -- ---_.- ---

2BK-S-P801·12

t~~I_~._~~I}P"hl-_·~~ ~~~.:j -:l---=-~=I=-

[)l n·bulylphlhalate '5I/E~ . ._ __ _~_~~__~... ~ __

Ail unils in ppb

TIERRA-A-017539
Analyte Result Water

Mile

Fresh Fresh FW·2 FW·2 FW2-NT FW2-NT

water (atwater (ct Effluent EMuent (ht (hcl

Dally Monthly

Max . Avg

Hal Non Res

Waste Soli

Classlft

cation

Res

Soli

Soil

Mice

r«~-··100 Ii -d

I I t¥EJIJISEJ I I '1 I I

Nickel 7400

Vanadium 89Xl

Zinc l00J0

._--_.-

2BK-SoPB01.fO

A

Ba

C

o

L

N

V

rsenic 3400

----

rium 66(XXJ

qJpef 23COJ

--------- --- -

i.~-butyt p1~!!.Jalat~ 110

-~-

ead 1:xxxJ

.-- ------~ -----

.-.__ .

tekel 2OO:Xl

-------- ---

anadium 27(00

- --- ---

IIlC (OCXX)

-

Z

All units In ppb.

SE (ht SE (het SE SE

Emuent Emuent

Dally Monthly

Mu Avg

Soli

Impact

toGW

.-----.------,.-------,,-----.-----,._--,---,.--_._- -_...----.--------,,---,---,.

1---+.-.-- ---

.----1---" - -_.

---- --.--1---- ~--

---+---+---+----1--- -----

+----l---I------J--- _

1---+---11---~--~--- ..__

_··---/----1

~i ----jl-----I- __

18

TIERRA-A-017540
Key to Crlten. Cited In Field Investigation and Historical Data Tables

Criteria Description

Freshwater tal USEPA Surface Water Criteria (Acute), November 1991

Freshwlter tcl USEPA Surface Water Criteria (Chronic), November 1991

FW-2 Effluent Dally Max. NJDEP Soil Cleanup Criteria, February 3, 1994

FW-2 Effluent Monthlv Avo NJDEP Soil Cleanup Criteria, February 3, 1994

FW2-NT(a) NJDEP Surface Water Criteria, (Acute). November 1991. '-.

FW2-NT tcl NJDEP Surface Water Criteria, (Chronic), November 1991.

FW2-NT (hc) NJDEP Surface Water Criteria, (Human Carcinogenic),

... November 1991.

Haz Waste Classification NJDEP Guidance Document for Remediation of Contaminated

Soils. June 1994.

Non Res Soli NJDEP Soil Cleanup Criteria. February 3, 1994

Res SOil NJDEP Soil Cleanup Criteria. February 3, 1994

SE (al NJOEP Surface Water Qualitv Standards (Acute). Aori! 1994.

SE te) NJDEP Surface Water Quality Standards (Chronic). Aoril 1994.

SE (h) NJDEP Surface Water Quality Standards (Human Health).

ADriI1994.

SE (he) NJDEP Surface Water Quality Standards (Human

Carcinogenic), April 1994.

SE Effluent Daily Max. NJDEP Guidance Document for Remediation of Contaminated

Soils. June 1994.

: SE Effluent Monthly Avg . NJOEP Guidance Document for Remediation of Contaminated

. Soils, June 1994.

Soil Impad to GW .IINJDEP Soil Cleanup Criteria. February 3, 1994 I

Soil 'Mise Miscellaneous Soil Criteria (Used to produce Gross Alpha, I

Gross Beta, and 2.3,7.8- TCDD reports)

WaterMisc Miscellaneous Water Criteria (Used to produce Gross Alpha,

c;,ross Beta, and 2.3.7,8- TeDD reports) I

TIERRA-A-017541
Table IV· A - 5 - 48

LIST OF IITRW SITES

WORK SITE 28 • KEEGAN

Passaic River Local Flood Protection Project

REASONS

SITE NAME FOR

ADDRESS AGENCY 10 DESIGNAnON RANK DELETION TOWNSHIP SOURCE Work Site 2B - Keegan Field Investigation A Bergen Ave. Kearny - . IT Ke~an landfill B Bergen Ave Kearny NJD981490428 CERCLA WilT

1=-

Diamond Head Oil Refinery C 11Q.1J:.l~uri~0-!l_Tpk(RT 508) Kearny NJD092226000 CERCLA WilT Gui.9non & Greene Co. C ~Q~~rgen ~v~ __ Kearny NJD980757579 CERCLA WilT §~S Motor Eguip!!l~nt qO_~.P~!lJ'J!lc.-- C 1800 Harrison Ave. Kearny NJD011370525 SPL W,rr-- ~earny Smelting 8. Refinil~g Co. -

C 936 "Harrison Ave Kearny NJDOO2520401 CERCLA WilT ~rew C~~mical C0r:E. 0 1106 Harrison Ave Kearny NJD053518536 CERCLA W;rr ~~~J?!?ell£~~~£1!}'~~. _________ ~ - - -- f-L ~--

2 1235 Harrison Ave Kearny NJD002457273 CERCLA IT

241-27Si5iikes Street NJD009717182 -CERCLAlSPC ~w:1T Interstate ~etals E 2,5 Kearny

Theoboicflndustries I S&e Oil CO~E)Naiionai Freight E 2:3 1215 Harrison-Avenue Kearny NJD9B0594006 CERCLA WilT .----~--------

E 3 300 Hoyt Street Kearny NJD981559875 ISRA Wilkala Packaging Corp. W,IT

Notes: .

CIi1~MAn.d....Ra.tiona'e Used to Delete Priority E HTRW Sites:

1. The site is not within the tunnel alignment database COrridOfsearch Of within 300 feet of a levee feature if outside the corridor.

2. The site has been rl!'OOlT1mended"No Further Action- by the USEPA or NJDEP.

3 HTRW cOntaminant concentrations are less than the proposed New Jerwy non-residential soli cleanup criteria.

4. The identified petroleum product spill Of leak was less than 100 gallons and does not impact groundwater.

5 The site-related HTRW contaminants are fimited to metals with no impad to groundwater and the site is not within 500 feet of IIworbhaft.

6. The site is a listed SPL Hudson County Chromate site and HTRW contaminants are fimited only to the chromate ore slag fiR Ofl the property.

7. The NPUSPL site is II secured radioadive malerials storage facility with no soil Of groundwater HTRW contamination.

8. The site is located on the east bank of the Hackensack River.

9. The site is only identified as a RCM sman Of large quantity generatOf of hazardous waste materials.

FEATUREWK4 01/04195

TIERRA-A-017542
HTRW SITE INFORMATION

Passaic River Local Flood Protection Project

Work Site 28 • Keegan Field Investigation

BergenAve.

5. Rank: A

6. Facility 10 Number:

7. Designation:

1. Name:

2. Address:

3. Town!Townshlp : Kearny

4. Feature: Work Site 2B - Keegan 8. Source: IT

9. Site Description and History :

The 2B-K work site is on the Keegan Landfil,l approximately 230 acres in size, and located at the foot of Bergen Avenue in Kearny,

NJ. The Keegan Landfill was active from approximately the mid 1960s until 1974. The landfill site is currently owned by the

Hudson Meadowlands Development Corporation. While the landfill was active it reportedly received industrial waste on 8 regular

basis. Industrial wastes deposited in the landfill included chromate and bichromate slurries, pigment wastes and organic

solvents. Historical records indicate the landfill has been the site of several underground fires.

10. Physical and Geologic Description of the Site:

Depth to bedrock is approximately 155 ft. Beneath 6 ft of fill, the overburden consists of fine to medium sand to 50 ft. varved clay

from 50-99 ft, and gravel and cobbles from 99 tt to bedrock. Bedrock is a fractured red shale and sandstone with layers of gypsum

and calcareous zones. Water level in the overburden is about 4 tt below ground level.

11. Quality of Information Reviewed :

MEDIA &tmE

Soil 16

COMMENT

MEDIUM - Available analytical data indicate HTRW present in soils.

Groundwater 15 MEDIUM - Available analytical data indicate groundwater is impacted.

12. Occupational Risk and Hazard Analysis:

MmM TOTAL RISK

Surficial Soil 5.70E-C5

Deep Soil 1.41E-05

ShallowGroundwater NA

Deep Groundwater 2.04E-07

TOTAL HAZARD

4.91E-Q1

1.25E-02

NA

4.47E-02

SITEINFO.WK412128/94 Page 1 of 2 9~

TIERRA-A-017543
HTRW SITE INFORMATION

Passaic ~iver Local Flood Protection Project

13. HTRW Constituents of Concern :

Free Product : NA Depth to Groundwater(tr) : 4

Product Thickness(tr) NA

SAMPLING REPORTED

MEDIA CONSTITUENT CAS.1& MAXCONC. LmII DArE DArE

Deep Groundwater Arsenic 7440-38-2 16.00 ~glL 07126/94

Deep Groundwater Chloroform 67~5.3 21.00 ~gJL 07126/94

Deep Groundwater Chromium 18540-29-9 27.00 ~g/L 07126/94

Deep Groundwater Copper 7440-5~ 29.00 ~glL 07126/94

Deep Groun~ter Oiehloroethylene, 1,2- (Mixed lsomerl) 54O-S~ 31.00 1Jg/L 07126194

Deep Groundwater Lead 7439-92-1 110.00 1J91l 07126/94

Deep Groundwater Manganese 7439-96-5 1,500.00 1J91L 07126/94

Deep Groundwater Mercury 7439-9Ni 0.23 ~gIL 07126194

Deep Groundwater Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-w\ 5.10 1J9IL 07126/94

Deep Groundwater Trichloroethylene 79-01~ 34.00 ~glL 07126/94

Deep Groundwater Vanadium 7440-62-2 130.00 1J91L 07126/94

Deep Groundwater Zinc 7440-66-6 170.00 1Jg/l 07126/94

Deep Soil Aldrin 309-00-2 45.00 IJglkg 06127/94

Deep Soil Barium 7440-39-3 711,000.00 IJglkg 06127/94

Deep Soil Chromium 18540-29-9 211,000.00 IJglkg 06127/94

Deep Soil Cobalt 744D-48~ 10,000.00 IJg/kg 06127/94

Deep Soil Copper 7440-50-8 47,500.00 IJglkg 06127/94

Deep Soil Dieldrin 60-57-1 24.00 1J9lkg 06127/94

Deep Soil Heptachlor Epoxide 1024-57-3 48.00 IJg/kg 06127/94

Deep Soil Lead 7439-92-1 258,000.00 IJS/kg 06127/94

Deep Soil Manganese 7439-96-5 520,000.00 IJg/kg 06127/94

Deep Soil Mercury 7439-97-6 650.00 IJglkg 06127/94

Deep Soil Methoxychlor 72-43-5 24.00 IJglkg 06127/94

"" Deep Soil Nickel 7440-02-0 22,000.00 IJglkg 06127/94

Deep Soil PAHs (as BAP) 50-32-8 52,500.00 jJg/kg 06127/94

Deep Soil PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) 1336-36-3 2,510.00 IJg/kg 06127/94

Deep Soil TPH TPH 2,000,000.00 IJg/kg 06127/94

Deep Soil Vanadium 7440-62-2 258,000.00 IJglkg 06127/94

Deep Soil Zinc 7440-66-6 479,000.00 IJg/kg 06127/94

Surficial Soil Antimony 7440-36-0 1,680,000.00 IJglkg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Barium 7440-39-3 23,200,000.00 1J9/kg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 48,400.00 IJg/kg 08/12194

SurfiCIal Soil Beryllium 7440-41-7 9,100.00 IJg/kg 08/12194

Surficial Soil 8is(2-ethylhexyl)Phthalate (DEHP 117-81-7 150,000.00 IJglkg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Cadmium 7440-43-9 112,000.00 IJg/kg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Chromium 18540-29-9 1,270,000.00 lJg/kg 08/12194

Surficial'Soil Cobalt 7440-48-4 41,100.00 IJglkg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Copper 7440-50-8 55,400,000.00 ~glkg 08/12194

Surficial Soil DOE 72-55-9 73,000.00 ~g/kg 08/12194

Surficial Soil DOT 50-29-3 50,000.00 !Jg/kg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 140,000.00 IJg/kg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Lead 7439-92-1 13,000,000.00 IJg/kg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Manganese 7439-96-5 2,050,000.00 IJg/kg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Mercury 7439-97-6 5,700.00 jJg/kg 08112194

Surficial Soil Nickel 7440-02-0 1,330,000.00 IJglkg 08/12194

Surficial Soil PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) 1336-36-3 120,000.00 jJg/kg 08112194

Surficial Soil Silver 7440-22-4 187,000.00 IJg/kg 08/12194

SurfiCial Soil Teaath_'benzDop-d"""n. 2.3.7.8. (TeOD} 1746-01-6 5.50 IJg/kg 08/12194

Surficial Soil TPH TPH 24,000,000.00 jJg/kg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Vanadium 7440-62-2 943,000.00 !Jglkg 08/12194

Surficial Soil Zinc 7440-66-6 10.100,000.00 jJglkg 08/12194

SITEINFOWK4 12128/94 Page 2 of 2

TIERRA-A-0175449
HTRW sITe INFORMATION

Passaic River Local Flood Protection Project

• .1-.,'

1. Name: Kearny Smelting & Refining Co. 5. Rank: C

2. Address: 936 Harrison Ave 6. Facility ID Number: NJD00252D~8 ~

3. Town!Township : Kearny 7. Designation: CERCLA

4. Feature: Work Site 28 - Keegan 8. Source: W,IT

9. Site Description and History:

Manufactures nonferrous metals lince 1945. Part ofthe property has been occupied by Diesel Components, Inc. since 1975

Scrap metal containing copper, tin and/or zinc alloys is used to produce bronze and brass ignots, Wastewater from these

operations was discharged to an unlined lagoon on site. In 1980 EPA informed the facility that an NPDES permit would be i

required for the la~oon discharga.

Numerous other VIolations have been documented involving mismanagement of hazardous/solid waste, release of fugitive I

emissions to the air, and dumping of fuel oils on local grounds. RIIFS sampling was executed in 1991 to delineate soil !

contamination and determine if groundwater is contaminated. It is unknow if remedial activities have been initiated. I

i

I

10. Physical and Geologic Description of the Site: i

NA i

I

"

j

11. Quality of Information Reviewed :

MEDIA GQBE COMMENT I

Soil 6 LOW - Available analytical data is not sufficient to Characterize the type I

!

and extent of HTRW in soil. I

I

Groundwater 0 LOW - Available analytical data is limited and not sufficient to assess if I

site-related HTRW has impacted groundwater.

12. Occupational Risk and Hazard Analysis:

MECIA TOTAL RISK TOTAL HAZARD

Surficial Soil 4.37E-D5 1.48E-01

Deep Soil NA NA

Shallow Groundwater NA NA

Deep Groundwater NA NA

13. HTRW Constituents of Concern :

Free Product : NA Depth to Groundwater(tr) NA

Product Thickness(tr) NA

SAMpLING REPORTED

MECIA CONSmuENT CAS..Ho.. MAX CONe UNJI OAIE DArE

Surficial Soil Antimony 7440-36-0 427,000.00 ~9/kg 09123/86

Surficial Soil Arsenic 7440-38-2 31,000.00 IJg/kg 09123/86

Surficial' Soil Beryllium 7440-41-7 41,000.00 ~g/kg 09123/86

I

Surficial Soil Cadmium 7440-43-9 600,000.00 IJg/kg 09123/86

I

Surficial Soil Chromium 18540-29-9 468,000.00 ~g/kg 09123/86

Surficial Soil Copper 7440-50-8 17,200.00 1J9/kg 09123/86

!

Surficial Soil Cyanide (free) 57 -12-5 11,700.00 IJg/kg 09123/86

i

Surficial Soil Dibutyl Phthalate 84-74-2 590.00 IJg/kg 09123/86

I

Surficial Soil Lead 7439-92-1 15,300,000.00 IJg/kg 09123/86

I

Surficial Soil Mercury 7439-97-6 10,000.00 IJg/kg 09123/86

Surficial Soil Naphthalene 91-20-3 1,400.00 IJg/kg 09123/86

I

i Surficial Soil Nickel 7440-02-0 458,000.00 ~g/kg 09123/86

I Surficial Soil PAHs (as SAP) 50-32-8 168,100.00 IJg/kg 09123/86 I Surficial Soil Phenol 108-95-2 10.00 IJg/kg 09123/86

I Surficial Soil Silver 7440-22-4 1,130,000.00 IJg/kg 09123/86

! Surficial Soil Zinc 7440-66-6 81,200,000,00 ~g/kg 09123/86

I

i

SITEINFOWK4 12/28/94 104

TIERRA-A-017545
HTRW SITE INFORMATION

Passaic River Local Flood Protection Project

1, Name: Keegan Landfill 5. Rank: B

2. Addre .. : Bergen Ave 6. Facility 10 Number: NJD981490428

3. Townrrownshlp: Kearny 7. Designation: CERCLA

4. Feature: Work Site 2B - Keegan 8. Source: W.rT

9. Site Description and History :

Municipal waste landfill approximately 230 acres operated from mid-1960s to 1974. Uncontrolled dumping of large debris,

including fumiture & appliances still continues. During operation, it received industrial waste, including chromate and bichromate

slurry. pigment and organic wastes. This is an unlined landfill and has the potential for GW contamination. Frank's Creek whch

originates on site and one unnamed creek pass through the landfill. These creeks converge south of the site and flow into the

Passaic River. There have been several underground fires on site, most recently in 1987. NJDEP recommended a closure plan be

submitted. Current status of closure plan is unknown.

10. Physical and Geologic Description of the Site:

Frank's Creek whch originates on site and one unnamed creek pass through the landfill. These creeks converge south of the site and

flow into the Passaic River.

11. Quality of Information Reviewed:

MEOlA .&QBE

So~ 11

Groundwater 2

COMMENT

LOW - Available analytical data is not sufficient to characterize the type

and extent of HTRW in soil.

LOW - Available analytical data is limited and not sufficient to assess if

site-related HTRW has impacted groundwater.

12. Occupational Risk and Hazard Analysis:

MEOlA TOTAL RISK

Surficial Soil 1.81E-05

Deep Soil NA

Shallow Groundwater NA

Deep Groundwater NA

TOTAL HAZARD

2.55E-Q3

NA

1.06E-02

NA

13. HTRW Constituents of Concern:

Free Product: NA

Product Thickness(IT) NA

Depth to Groundwater(IT) NA

SAMPLING REPORTED

MEOlA CONSTITUENT CAS....ffg. MAXCONC. 1ltiII CAlf QAIE

Shallow Groundwater Barium 7440-39-3 445.00 ~gJL 04125/89

Shallow Groundwater Iron 7439-89~ 11,900.00 ~gJL 04125/89

Shallow Groundwater Lead 7439-92-1 159.00 IJgJL 04125/89

Shallow Groundwater Manganese 7439-Q6.5 484.00 1J9IL 04125/89

Shallow Groundwater Mercury 7439·97~ 1.20 IJgJL 04125189

Shallow Groundwater Zinc 7440~6~ 339.00 ~glL 04125/89

Surficial Soil Chromium 18540-29-9 116,000.00 jJg/kg 04125/89

Surficial Soil Lead 7439-92-1 1,180,000.00 jJg/kg 04125/89

Surficial Soil Mercury 7439-97~ 8,700.00 !Jg/kg 04125/89

Surficial Soil PAHs (as BAP) 50-32-8 63,900.00 !Jglkg 04125/89

Surficial Soil PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) 1336-36-3 6.600.00 ~glkg 04125/89

Surficial Soil Tetrachloroethane, 1,1.2,2- 79-34-5 68.00 ~glkg 04125/89

Surficial So~ Xylenes 1330-20-7 100.00 !Jg/kg 04125/89

SITEINFO.WK412128/94

TIERRA-A-01754606
HTRW SITE INFORMATION

PaaIc RIver Local Flood PTatec:tion Project

1. NIIme: ~ Head 011R.fiMf)' 15. Rank : C

2.Addreu: 1«)1 H8triIon Tpk (RT 508) I. FacUity 10 Number: NJD092226000

:So TownITownship : Kumy 7. De.ig~tion: CERCLA

i

<&. Future: Work Sita 28 • Keegan 8. Source : W.rT I

•• Site Description and Hiatory :

j A wale aI NPfoceAOfoperMing underwrioua na~ & aubalcliariM from 1946 - 1919. In 1985 the fKlli1y _s sold to Mimi

Urban o-v-lopment Corp. now known .. Hudaon Meadows Urben R..-.I Development Corp. The alte IIcurftl1tly lnactiw and

ClOftIiIla rlI........idll....., 15.,. rlI undwIloped IInd compriMd of wetIlInd .reas and d,.inage dilc;hes. a small pond. a landfill

.,.. CO'IINd~ ~ ~ the -*" portion of the lIta, .nd tna I'MlIIInts of the former I

Diamond Oil.tlnary an ...." portion I fJlthe aIta. The!.bIndclnad relin«y portion of the lite /1ClW contains various

I

construction debris. lnc:Iuding the c:unc:nte foundation of the farmer on-sita building and two former ASTs.

to. Physical and Geologic Deaetiptiun ..fthe Site:

TM Site Is sItlMted an ~ ...." depoaIts, which conslst fJI orpnic: slII and mud with lnc:luaions tJI put. undertylng these

depoalla _ the ~ ~. deposita which c:onsIst mainly oI .. nda enclilravala. Included In U- deposits e,. lenses of .Its and cIeyI. Stcnge c:apKIy fJI tna ftwIel deposits Is apparently high. Unclerlying these deposb IItM reel aNIle and .. ncIst_

bedrock 01 the BrUMWic:Ic farmdon.

Water IIwlI takM from wwit .... Incr.eat .. grouna-ter lIow djrec:lion from east to -at with moderate perturbations due to

~ ..... fJI NCharge. TM gnaundw8ter tabla uiIts from an approximate depth fJl4-5 II below grade along the perimeter tJI

I

the de to an epprGllimate depth fJl12-1.1I1n tna middle portion fJlthe de (Iandfillara). The hydraUlic: gradient eetCIIS the site

rang .. from 0.005 ·0.015 It.

11. Quality ortnfDnnltion Reviewed :

lElIA GQM: COMMeNT

Soil 15 LOW· Available analytical data is not sufficient to characterize the type

and ellleni of HTRW in soiL

Groundwater 10 MEDIUM· Available analYtical data indicate groundwater is impacted.

12. OCcupational Risk and Hazard Analysis:

lElIA IQTAL. RISK TpTAl, HAZAl!O

Sulficial SolI NA 4.69E~

Deep SolI NA NA

Shallow Groundwater 1.115E-Cl6 4.18E.Q1

0Mp Groundwater NA NA

13. HTRW Constituents of Coneem ;

Fr.. Product : V.. Depth to Groundwater(l\') 14

Product Thiclcneu(1r} : NA

IAMPl-INO REFORmJ

M.EQI6 CDHSTTTUINT CAI.1IL MAl!. cpNe llIiII WI CAIi

Shallow Groundwater AnenIc: 7440-~2 46.00 I.Ig1L 07102194 07102194

Shallow Groundwater a.nz- 71-43-2 30.00 I.Ig1L 07102194 07/02194

Shallow Groundwlter 8erIzoic AcId 6>85.Q 130.00 I.Ig1L 07/02194 07/02194

Shallow Groundwater Chiorobennne 108-90-7 18.00 IlglL 07102194 07102194

ShaDow GrouncIwIIter C)'UlIde l'/rM) 57·12·5 30.00 IlglL 07102J94 07/02194

Shallow Gl'OUIICI'Nater DIchIoroethane. 1.1- 75-34-3 21.00 IlglL 07/02194 07102194

Shallow Groundwater OlchIoroeth,1ene. Tran .. 1.2· 156-S0-5 19.00 IlglL 07102194 07102194

Shallow Groundwater DimethyIphenoI. 2," 105-67·9 390.00 I.Ig1L 07102194 07/02194

ShallowGrouncIwater Ethyl BenzeM 1~1'" 23.00 IIg1L 071021fM 07102194

ShalloW Groundwater Hexanane. 2· 591·78-6 25.00 IIg1L 071021fM 071021fM

Shallow Groundwater L.-d 7439-92-1 319.00 I.Ig1L 071021fM 07102J9.4

Shallow Groundwater t.4ethyIlsobulyl Kelone 1Q8.10-1 98.00 I.Ig1L 07/02194 07/02194

Shallow Groundwater MethylnapthaleM.2- 91·57~ 22.00 IIg1L 07/02194 07/02/904

Shallow Groundwater r.1etnyIphenoI. 2- 95-48-7 310.00 IIg1L 07/02194 07/02194

Shallow Groundwat.r t.4ethylphenol, 4- 106-44-5 900.00 IlglL 07/02194 07102194

Shallow Groundwater N.phthalene 91·20-3 39.00 IJglL 07/02194 07/02194

Shallow Groundwater Toluene 108-88-3 160.00 IIg1L 07102/904 07/02194

Shallow Groundwaler TrichIoroethyIen 79-01~ 11.00 IlglL 07102194 07/02194

Shallow Gfoundw.ter VIn)'I Chloride 75001 ... 12.00 IlgiL 07/02194 07/02194

Shallow Groundwater Xylenes 1330-20-7 140.00 IlglL 07102194 07/02194

Surficial Soil Aluminum 742!O-90-5 22.900.000.00 II 'l1Kg 07/02191

Surficial SolI Berium 7440-39-3 2.000.000.00 IlglKIl 07/02191

Surfiei81 SolI Cadmium 7440--3-9 4.900.00 IlglKg 07102191 I Surfic:ial Soil Calcium 7440-70-2 33.100.000.00 IIg1Kg 07/02191 I

Surficial Soil CcmaIt 744~ 51.800.00 IlglKg 07/02191

Surficial SolI Copper 7440-50-8 161.000.00 IlglKg 07/02191

Surficial Soil Cyenide (fr.. ) 57-12·5 4,200.00 IlglKg 07/02191

Surficial Soil EIhyII*Iz_ 1D0-41 ... 46.00 IlglKg 07/02191

Surficlel Soil Iron 7439-aU 21.600.000.00 IlglKg 07/02191 I

Surficial Soil laid 7439-92-1 8,110.000.00 I.Ig1Kg 07102191 I

SUlficill Soil Magnesium 7439-95-<1 20.300.000.00 loIQIkg 07/02/91

Surficial SolI Mangenau 7439-96-5 200.000.00 IJglkg 07/02191 !

Surficial SolI NicIcII 7JI4().()2.() 190,000.00 l.Ig1kg 07/Q2I91 I

Surficial Soil Xylenu 133Q-20-7 320.00 l.Ig1kg 07/02191 . I

SIUficieI Soil ~ 744C1-66-6 1.040.000.00 l.Ig1kg 07102191 j

I

srTEINFo.wK4 12J2819ot t07

TIERRA-A-017547
HTRW SITE INFORMATION

Passaic River Local Flood Protection Project

1. Name: Guignon & Greene Co. 5. Rank: C

2. Address: 402 Bergen Ave 6. Facility 10 Number: NJD9B0757579

3. TownlTownship : Kearny 7. Designation : CERCLA

4. Feature: Work Site 28 - Keegan 8. Source: W,IT

9. Site Description and History :

Guignon & Greene Company (G&G) accepts large shipments of various oils by railcar, which are stored in tanks and then blended

and packaged in drums. There a several hundred drums present at any given time. The materials consisted of tall oil, fatty acids,

pine oil, minal spirits. and kerosene. In 1990, NJOEP issued an emergency general permit to G&G for containment and cleanup

of an oil spill into adjacent wetlands. NJOEP records indicate a fire at G&G burned a significant amount of petroleum, resulting in

probable soil contamination.

10. Physical and Geologic Description of the Site:

groundwater is approximately 1-211 below the surface depending upon the amount of fill material present.

11. Quality of Information Reviewed:

MEQ1A KQ.B.E

Soil 1

Groundwater o

COMMENT

LOW - Available analytical data is not sufficient to characterize the type

and extent of HTRW in soil.

LOW - Available analytical data is limited and not sufficient to assess if

site-related HTRW has impacted groundwater.

12. Occupational Risk and Hazard Analysis:

MEDIA TOTAL RISK

Surficial Soil NA

Deep Soil NA

Shallow Groundwater NA

Deep Groundwater NA

TOTAL HAZARD

NA

NA

NA

NA

CONSTITUENT MAXCONC

SAMpLING

QAIE

REPORTED

~

13. HTRW Constituents of Concern :

Free Product: NA

Product Thickness(ft) NA

Depth to Groundwater(tf) 2

SITEINFOWK4 12/28/94 10E

TIERRA-A-017548
HTRW SITE INFORMATION

PauaIc River Local Flood Protection Project

!i.lUnk:

6. Facility 10 Number:

7. Deslgn8tlon :

D,.., Chemlc:ail Corp.

1106 Harrison Ave

Keamy

o

NJD053518536

CERCLA

1. Name:

2. Addres.:

3. TownlI'ownship:

4. Feature: Work Site2B - Keegan 8. Source: W, IT

9. Sfte Description and HJstory :

Produces boUer compounds, .-in! defoamers, water treatment chemiCIIls. and other specialty chemiCIIls. The planHtH been in

operation lince 1870. Hundreds of 55-Gallon dtums and • .....,..1 ASTs are onesite. Hazardous waste generated Itthe site includes

off-spec materials, waste alkaline. formic add, and obsolete material.

10. Physical and Geologic Deecriptlon of the Site :

The aquifer of concern underneath the site consists of gladal till of Pleistocene age. Depth to groundwater undemeath the site is

approximetely 20 ft from ground surface. Shallow solis consist of dark brownJblac:k; loose-cohesive, fine to coarse-grained send,

gravel and silt fill mllterill ..

11. Quality of Information Reviewed :

MEDIA ICQBE

Soli 31

COMMENT

HIGH· Available analytical data is of sufticient quality and reftects

current conditions of HTRW site soli.

lOW - Available analytiCIII data is limited and not sufficient to assess If

sitH"llated HTRW has imp8ded groundwater.

Groundwater o

12. Occup8tlonal Risk and Hazard Analysla:

IdEDJA TOTAL RISK

Surficial Soli 1.36E-06

Deep Soli NA

Shallow Groundwater NA

Deep Groundwater NA

TOTAl. HAZARD

9.78E-oS

NA

NA

NA

Depth to Groundwater(IT): NA

MECIA SAMPJ,.JNQ REPORTED CONSTIJVENT CAS.k MAXCONC WlII DAtE DAIE Surficial Soil Cadmium 7440-43-9 1,000.00 ~glkg 08119/92

Surficial Soil lead 7439-92-1 500,000.00 ~glkg 08119192

Surficial Soil PAHs (as SAP) 50-32-8 4,850.00 ~glkg 08/19/92

Surficial Soli PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) 1336-36-3 460.00 ~glkg 08119192

Surficial Soil TPH TPH 15,000,000.00 Jlglkg 08119/92

..... ~a'I .... _ftMIIdtJrf

USt'CE.1\IInra8 DIslnct ~ 10IN

. .-...v cI IN inII ,.:nby IT CllrpCnIIlII.

SITEINFOWK4 12/28194

109

TIERRA-A-017549
HTRW SITE INFORMATION

Passaic River Local Flood Protection Project

1. Name: G&S Motor Equipment Company,lnc:. 5. Rank: C

2. Address: 1800 Harrison Ave, 6. Facility 10 Number: NJD011370525

3. TownfTownship : Keamy 7. Designation: SPL

4. Feature: Work Site 2B - Keegan 8. Source: W,rT

9. Site Description and History:

A former transformer recycling facility. Transformer fluids were drummed and shipped off-site. PCB contamination of soils has

been documented on site by the EPA in 19n and 1988.

...

10. Physical and Geologic Description of the Site:

The water table is at or near the ground surface, and GW flows east toward the Hackensack River. The geologic composition of the

Hackensack Meadows is Tidal Marsh of Marine Origin, Bedrock in·the Hackensack River Basin, consisting of the Newark Group of

Triassic Age, is composed of diabase dikes and sills. and gently westward dipping sandstone, conglomerate and shale, The

Brunswick Formation of the Newark Group is the only important bedrock aquifer in the region. Water occurs in this aquifer in joints

and fractures in a zone that is estimated to be between 200 and 600 ft thick.

11. Quality of Information Reviewed:

MECJA SCQB.E

Soil 9

Groundwater o

COMMENT

LOW - Available analytical data is not sufficient to characteriZe the type

and extent of HTRW in soil.

LOW - Available analytical data is limited and not sufficient to assess jf

site-related HTRW has impacted groundwater.

12. Occupational Risk and Hazard Analysis:

MEJ:2IA TOTAL RISIS

Surficial Soil 1.43E-05

Deep Soil NA

Shallow Groundwater NA

Deep Groundwater NA

TOTAL HAZARD

5.66E-03

NA

NA

NA

13. HTRW Constituents of Concern :

Free Product: NA

Product Thickness(ff) NA

Depth to Groundwater(ff): NA

SAMpLING REPORTED MEJ:2IA CONSTITUENT ~ MAXCONC lJNfI DAIE DArE Surficial Soil Chromium, 18540-29-9 578,000.00 IJg/kg 11130/88

Surficial Soil Lead 7439-92-1 1,010,000.00 IJg/kg 11130/88

Surficial Soil PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) 1336-36·3 532.000.00 IJglkg 11130/88

SITEINFO,WK4 12128/94

TIERRA-A-01755012
·;

j

. '~. .

" .,

REFERENCE NO. 10

TIERRA-A-017551
cym1:'DE'T1lIJn T);'rHNTr A.' A~~F~~MFNT AND RESPONSE TEAM. PROJECT NOTES ;;::l'UL ~.a ......' '-'1"''''' ..... - ... - ,-_ ... .-. - .. - .--

TO: DATE: Pag~ 1 oD I

Keellan Landfill file 06109/97

~

K Campbell (i9

SUl:3JI:-cr

PassaIc RIver Flood ProtectIOn Data I

i

IT Corporation. under contract to the US Anny Corps of Engineers. conducted a hydrogeologic investigation and

a Hazardous. Toxic. or Radioactive Waste (HTRW) activities at the Keegan LF site. Excerpts of the hydrogeologic

report are mcluded in Reference No 8~excerpts of the HTRW Report are presented in Reference No.9. Laboratorv

anal\11cal data (Form I data sheets) from the soil and groundwater samphng events are attached for referral. The

.J

remamder of the laboratory data sheets (I.e., MSIMSD data. method blank data. TICs) are stored in the Reference

Subsection of the START II Keegan LF TOO file. Data summary tables are included in pages 2 and 3 of this ProJect

Note. The follOWinganalytical data (Form I sheets) are attached for review

ATTACl-JMFNT DESCRIPTION ]

A Subsurface soil samples S-P80 1-08, S-PBO 1-12.

8 Subsurface soil sample S-PBOI-IOO.

C Subsurface soil samples 5-081-02. 5-0BI-04.

o Surface soil samples S-HAI to S-HA4: S-HA6 to S-HA9.

E Surface soil samples S-HAIO to S-HAI3.

F Groundwater samples TB-0726. GW-OBI. GW·PBI.

All noted sample numbers are preceded by "28K-," the sample prefIX for Workshaft 28 at Keegan LF.

Equipment rinsate blank samples, a trip blank sample, envirorunental duphcate samples, and MSIMSD samples

were also collecled dunng samphng as QAlQC samples

--- ~

~r.IO

TIERRA-A-017552
DeN START ·02·F ·01093

Table 1: PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT DATAlJrJDDD

SOIL SAMPUNG DATES: 05119/94 THROUGH 08/12194

ContamlNlnt

sam "No.

-TAL Metal

Aluminum

Barium

Chromium

Iron

S.QB1.04 S·HA1· S·HA2' S·HA3' 5-HA4' s-t\A6. S-HA7· S·HA8' S-HA9" S-HA10'

,. ."/" '

8,100 5,300 11,000 12,000 8,560 ~,940 3,570 ",640 5,180 5,280 18,000 9,220 13,!IOO

128 8.38 68 130 252 388 2,300 783 1,890 1,7~ 2,700 2,7~ 23,200

U 8.3 19 211 40.9 38.9 2~9 171 386 179 406 ~7 295

7,300 5,500 23,000 23,000 11,100 1~,700 35,!IOO 25,800 ~.3OO 77.100 60,200 35,100 ~,800

9.~ 13 15 199 ~52 .,460 959 1,090 1,850 13.000 7,700 7,2~

O.~ 0.67 5.7 1.3 3.8 3.2 3.6 1 3.7

.~~.

;~<. , ~c.~ . ,:to~ ~,

""''l' .' .-.:," ,,~. ~, 'I "~~:·ic'_.lr;'::

44BJ 63J 300J 7,600 15.000 810 1,500

150 J 110 J 90J .,700

160BJ

,:

9,600 2,620 12.aoo 18.aoo

3,300 1,370 2..2 ~.070

262 101 450 1,270

57,800 8.000 53,800 202,000

9,400 ~,280 564 8,520

1.4 0.31 1.3

2,000

2,200

910 .....00 2,100 4,200

1,400 ".100 7.200 5,000 1,500 500 13,000 430

670 1.!IOO ",000 8.100

720 4,100 4,200

1,800 8,200 3,700 3,600

660 5,400 140,000 640

1.100 7,500 2,500 2,000

1,700 8,600 4,400 4,800

3,700

77

430 3,800 45.000 120,000 7,400

790 20

7,400 73,000 480 6,300 27,000 210

31 120 3,700 9,400 2,000 6,800 50,000 140 230 100

Sample Deslgnalions:

'. Sampte Nos. S-HAI through S·HA13 are surficial soil samples (a.g ,collected f.om a depth less than 2 feet.

'PB' - Sample collected 'rom a pilot borehole in bedrock; the nnal number indicates sample depth

'OB' - Sample collecled from overburden borehole; the nnal number indicates sample depth.

1,200 J

1.800

4,000

4,800

".200

5.200

4.100

9.900

300 J

6,700

1.2.4-Trichklrobenzene

Trlchloroelhene

7,800

PCBs· Total Atoclo.s 2,230

20

Aldrin 4S

12

4'.4'·000

7.1

';'.4'-DDE

4',4'-DDT

38

Dieldrin 24

Endrin

All sample numbers are preceded by "2BK·"

J . Esllmated value.

B • Delecled In blank sample.

- • Not detected

ReI. Nos. 8. p. 28; 10, Ails. A through E

KEEGAN.SIP TIERRA-A-017553
Table 2: PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION DATA

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATE: JULY 26.1994

E E c: "

~ II> II> " "

g

" "

c c

~ 's .. !:! ...J II> II>

III e .r: .r:

~ "8 "8 .<:

()

.S! .S!

.r: .r:

~

u

l!'

"ii

ISamplr No.

GW.QBI

~...... ~

GW·PBI 0.028 46.2 0.024 31 34 S.I

TB.Q726 (VO ....I ONLY) N .... N .... N .... NA N ....

All sample numbers are preceded by "2BK-.·

• - Not derecred.

NA - Nor analyzed for panicular contaminant.

-of'le p.1 "f+-. ,

TIERRA-A-017554
rnINTERNATIONAL

TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES

.)

CERTIFlCATE OF ANALYSIS

ITEM/P •••• ic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

165 Fieldcre.t Ave.

Edi.oa, NJ 08837

Atta: M •• Paulette Frank

Date: June 16, 1994

NJ Lab Certificatioa ID#: 12064

Job No.: 529740 P.O. Number: 529740-06-01-04

Tbi. is tbe Certificate of Analysis for-the following samples:

Client Project 10:

Date Received:

Number of Samples:

Sample Type:

PASSAIC TUNNEL HTRW INV.

05/18/94

4

SOIL/WATER

I. Iatroductioa

Sample. were labeled a. follows:

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

2BK-S-PBOI-OS

2BK-S-PBOl-12

2BK-S-PBOl-12 MS

2BK-S-PBOl-12 MSO

LABORATORY I

F4-0S-142-01

F4-0S-142-02

F4-0S-142-03

F4-0S-142-04

Reviewed aad ApprDved:

>'zj'<c ~1cnv:dEileea S. He.etb

Project MaDager

Amenean Counc1l ot Independent Laboratories

International Assooation or EnVironmental Tesbno LaboratOries

Amenean Assoc1ation fOrLaboratory kaed1tat1on

i?f:. 10

ITADczly11cCd s.mc. •165ne1dczelt AftDU8, Ed1aoD. HJ OSU,. (201)225-2000 at.t-89

J4j.A - r·t

TIERRA-A-017555
Page: 7

company:

Date:

Client Job No. I

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON, NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: F4-05-1~2

TEST NAME: Metals

SAMPLE 10: 2BK-S-PB01-08

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 05/25/94

Results in ma/Kg Detection

Dry Wt. Lima

Antimony ND 1.4

Aluminum 5100 14

Arsenic ND 1.4

Barium 128 0.70

Beryllium ND 0.70

Cadmium ND 0.70

Calcium 1000 14

Chromium 9.4 1.4

Cobalt 3.48 1.4

Copper 5.9 3.5

Iron 7300 14

Lead 9.4 7.0

Magnesium 1800 14

Manganese 50 0.70

Mercury ND 0.14

Nickel 9.9 5.6

Potassium 4608 70

Selenium ND 0.70

Silver NO 1.4

Sodium 130B 14

Thallium NO 1.4

Vanadium 8.6 1.4

Zinc 24 2.8

Comments: NO indicates the compound is not detected at ~he level

indicated.

TIERRA-A-017556
page: 8

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANAlYTICAL SEP.V1CES

EDISON, NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: ~4-05-1~2

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Neutrals

SAMPLE ID: 2BK-S-PBOI-08

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 05/19194

Results in ug/Kg

(Dry 'I'i::)

Acenapht.hene

Acenaphthylene

Ant.hracene

Benzidine

Benzo(a)Anthracene

Benzo(b)Fluoranthene

Benzo(k)Fluoranthene

Benzo(a)Pyrene

Benzo(g,h,i}perylene

bis{2-Chloroethyl)Ether

bis(2-ChloroethoxYlHethane

bls{2-Ethylhexyl)?hthalate

bis(2-Chlorolsopropyl)Ether

4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether

Butyl Benzyl Phthalate

4-Chloroanillne

2-Chloronaphthalene

4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether

Chrysene

nibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Dibenzofuran

Di-n-butylphthalate

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,3-0ichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

3,3'-Oichlorobenzidine

Oiethylphthalate

Dimethylphthalate

2,4-0initrotoluene

2,6-0initrotoluene

Di-n-Oct.ylphthalate

1,2-0iphenylhydrazine

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Hexachlorobenzene

HexachlorObutadiene

79SJ

320J

87BJ

Aft. A, f·S

OeteCtlon

:..lmIt.

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 4,0

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 930

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

470

TIERRA-A-017557
Page: 9

company:

Da~e:

Client Job No.:

ITEM/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

Jun. 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

£DISON. NJ

(906) 225·2000

Work Order: r4-D5-1~2

TEST NAME: Acid/Ba •• N.u~rals

SAMPLE ID: 2BK-S-PBOI-08

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

Hexachloroethane

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene

Isophorone

2-Hethylnaphthalene

Naphthalene

2-Nitroaniline

3-Nitroanili.ne

4-Nltroaniline

Nitrobenzene

N-nitroso-dimethylamine

N-Nitrosodipropylamine

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

Phenanthrene

Pyrena

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

Benzoic Acid

Benzyl Alcohol

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

2-Chlorophenol

2,4-Dichlorophenol

2,4-Dimethylphenol

2,4-Dinitrophenol

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol

·2-Methylphenol

4-Methylphenol

2-Nitrophenol

4-Nitrophenol

Pentachlorophenol

Phenol

2,4,S-Trichlorophenol

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

ND 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 2300

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 470

NO 2300

NO 2300

NO 2300

NO 2300

NO 470

NO 2300

NO :::.300

NO 470

NO 2300

NO 470

TIERRA-A-017558
Page: 10

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW 1nv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. Nl

(908) 225- 2000

work Order: F4-05-l~2

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Neutrals

SAMPLE 10: 2BK-S-PBOI-08

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

Surrogates \ Recovery

Nitrobenzene-dS

2-Fluorobiphenyl

Terphenyl-d14

Phenol-dS

2-Fluorophenol

Tri.bromophenol

73

83

119

80

73

109

Comments: NO indicates the ccm?ound ~s not detec~ed at the level

ind~cated.

TIERRA-A-017559
page: 11

company:

Da~e:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAl. SERVICE:;

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225·2000

Work order: f4-05-1~:

TEST NAME: Volatile Organics

SAMPLE IO: 2BK-S-PBOI-OS

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

ANALYSIS DATE: OS/20194

Results in

Acrolein

Acrylonitrile

Benzene

Bromoform

Bromomethane

Carbon Tetrachloride

Chiorobenzene

Chlorodibromomethane

Chioroethane

2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether

Chloroform

Chloromet.hane

Dichlorobromomethane

l,l-Dichloroet.hane

l,2-oichloroet.hane

l,l-Dichloroet.hene

1,2-0ichloroet.hene

1,2-Dichloropropane

cis-I,3-0ichloropropene

trans-l,3-0ichloropropene

Ethylbenzen.

Methylene Chloride

1,1,2,2-Tet.rachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

1, 1, I-Trichloroethane

I,1,2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene

Trichlorofluoromethane

Vinyl Chloride

Acetone

2-Butanone

Vinyl Acet.at.e

2-Hexanone

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone

Styrene

ug/Kg

(Dry WtJ

Detection

Limn

NO 14

NO 14

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO i

NO 7

NO 7

NO

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 7

NO 14

NO 14

NO 3S

NO 14

NO 14

NO 14

NO 14

ND 14

68~ 189

TIERRA-A-017560
Page: 12

Company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW rnv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON, NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: F4-05-1~2

TEST NAME: Volatile Organics

SAMPLE ID: 2BK-S-PBOI-0S

S~~PLE DATE: 05/17/94

Xylenes

Mechyl-Terc-Bucyl-ECher(MTBE)

Terc-Butyl-Alcohol (T8A)

Carbon Disulfide

l,l,l.2-Tecrachloroechane

NO 14

NO 14

NO 14

NO 7

NO 7

Sur-::'oga,-es 't.Rec:overy

Toluene-dS

8romofluorobenzene

.1.2-Dichloroethane-d~

109

83

108

Commen~s: NO indlcates ~he compound 1S not detecced ac che level

indlcated.

,Aft. A, p.7- TIERRA-A-017561
Page: 13

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaie Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: F4-05-1~:

TEST NAME: P•• ~icid •• /PCB

...

SAMPLE 10: 2BK-S-PB01-08

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

ANALYSIS DATE:

QC BATCH #:

05/18194

2248

Results in

Aldrin

alpha-BHe

beta-BHC

Chlordane

delta-8HC

gamma-BHc

4,4'-000

4,4'-00E

4,4'-00T

Dieldrin

Endosulfan I

Endo5ulfan II

Endosulfan sulfate

Endrin

Endrin aldehyde

Heptaehlor

Heptachlor epoxide

Methoxyehlor

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016

Aroclor-1221

Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-124S

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

Endrin Ketone

Surrogat.es

Oecaehlorobiphenyl

Detecti.on

ug/Ka Limit

__ --l:N,!LO 2 • 3

__ ---l.lN~O 2 . J

___ ~N~D 2.3

__ ---l.lN~O 2 • 3

___ .:.:.N""O 2 .3

___ .:.:.N""O 2.3

___ :..:.N~O 4.7

___ .:.:.N""O 4.7

___ :..:.N~O 4.7

___ N"",D",- 4.7

___ N"",Dl<. 2.3

___ :..:.N~D 4.7

___ :..:.N~D 4.7

___ .:.:.N""O 4.7

___ :..:.N~D 4.7

___ .:.:.N",O 2.3

___ :..:.N~O 2.3

___ .:.:.N",O 23

___ .:.:.NO~ 230

___ .:.:.N",O 47

___ :..:.N~D 47

___ :..:.ND~ 47

___ ;..;.NDl<. 47

___ :..:.N~D 47

___ .:.:.N,::;O 47

___ :..:.N""O 47

___ :..:.N~O 4.7

\ Recovery

74

Comments: U or NO indicates eompound is not. det.ected at. level lndlcated.

When units are ug/Kg, results are reported on a dry welgnt baSlS.

582·\·89

TIERRA-A-017562
Page: 17

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVI~...s

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: F'-05-1~2

TEST NAME: Metals

SAMPLE ID: 2BK-S-PBOl-12

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 05/25/94

Resule5 l.n mg/Kg Deeece1.on

Dry We. Limit

Ant:.mony NO 1.2

Aluminum 5300 12

t>.rsenic NO 1.2

Bar:.um 8.3B 0.60

Beryllium NO 0.60

Cadmium NO 0.60

Calc i'..Im 870 12.0

Chromium 8.3 1.2

CObalt 2.9B 1.2

Copper 6.4 3.0

Iron 5500 12

Lead NO 6.0

Magneslum 1600 12

Manganese 42 0.60

Mercu:-y NO 0.12

N1.ckel :.4 4.8

Poeassium 480B 60.0

Selenium NO 0.60

Sl.lver NO 1.2

Sodium 100B 12

Thall ium . ND 1.2

Vanadlum 8.9 1.2

Zinc 18 2.4

Commenes: NO indicates the compound l.5 not deeected at the level

indicated.

AH.A, p.'!

TIERRA-A-017563
Page: 18

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERV1CES

EDISON, NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: F4-05-142

TEST NAME: Acid/B ••• Neutrals

SAMPLE 10: 2BK-S-PB01-12

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 05/19/94

Results in

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Anthracene

Benzidine

Benzc(a)Anthracene

Benzc(b)Flucranthene

Benzc(k)Fluoranthene

Benzo(a)Pyrene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether

4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether

Butyl Benzyl Phthalate

4-Chloroaniline

2-Chlcrcnaphthalene

4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether

Chrysene

.Oibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Oibenzofuran

Oi-n-butylphthalate

1,2-0ichlorobenzene

1,J-Oichlorobenzene

1,4-0ichlorobenzene

J,J'-Oichlorobenzidine

Oiethylph~halate

Oimethylphthalate

2,4-0initrotoluene

2,6-0initrotoluene

Di-n-Octylphthalate

1,2-Diphenylhydrazine

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Hexachlorobenzene_

Hexachlorobutadiene

ug/Kg

(Dry Wt)

44BJ

150J

160BJ

NO

Au. A) p. 10

Detec::tl.on

Ll.m ..t

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

400

NO 400

ND 400

NO 400

NO 800

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

400

400

NO 400

NO 400.

NO 400

ND 400

TIERRA-A-017564
Page: 19

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passa~c Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225·2000

Wo~k O~de~: F4-05-1~~

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Neutrals

SAMPLE 10: 2BK-S-P801-12

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

Hexachloroethane

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

Indeno(1,2,J-cd)py~ene

Isopho~one

2-Methylnaphthalene

Naphthalene

2-Nit~oaniline

J-Nitroaniline

4-Nitroanil:.ne

Nitrobenzene

N-nitroso-dlmethylam:.ne

N-Nitrosodipropylamine

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

Benzoic ACid

Benzyl Alcohol

4-Chloro-J-methylphenol

2-Chlorophenol

2,4-Dichlorophenol

2,4-Dimethylphenol

2,4-Dlnitrophenol

4.6-0initro-2-methylphenol

2-Methylphenol

-4-Methy Iphenol

2-Nitrophenol

4-Nitrophenol

Pentachlorophenol

Phenol

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

At+· A If' ({

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

ND 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

ND ..00

NO 2000

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 400

NO 2000

NO 2000

NO 2000

NO 2000

NO 2000

NO 2000

NO 2000

NO 400

NO 2000

NO 400

682"·89

TIERRA-A-017565
Page: 20

company:

Date:

Client Job Mo.:

ITEK/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: F4-05-1~2

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Neutrals

SAMPLE 10: 2BK-S-PBOl-12

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

Surrogates \ Recovery

Nitrobenzene-dS

2-Fluorobiphenyl

Terphenyl-d14

Phenol-dS

2-Fluorophenol

Tribromophenol

66

79

120

80

64

102

Comments: NO indicates the compound is not detected at the level

indicated.

TIERRA-A-017566
Page: 21

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Pa.ssaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225·2000

Work Order: F4-05-1~2

TEST N~ME: Volatile Organics

SAMPLE IO: 2BK-S-PBOl-12

S~MPLE DATE: 05/17/94

~N~LYSIS DATE: OS/20/94

Results in

Acrolein

Acrylonitrile

Benzene

Bromoform

Sromomethane

Carbon Tetrachlorlde

Chlorobenzene

Chlorodibromomethane

Chloroethane

2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether

Chloroform

Chlorometha.ne

Dichlorobromomethane

1,1-Olchloroethane

1,2-Dlchloroethane

l,l-Dlchloroethene

1,2-0ichloroethene

l,2-D~=hlorcpropane

c~s-l,3-0ichloropropene

trans-1,3-0ichloropropene

Ethylbenzene

~ethylene Chloride

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

:etrach1oroethene

:'::lluene

l,l,l-Trichloroethane

l,l,2-Trlchloroethane

7r icr.loroethene

:'rich1orofluoromethane

\' ~ 1'1 Y1 Ch lor ide

';ce~one

2-Sutanone

'Jlnyl ~cetate

2-Hexanone

~-Methyl-2-Pentanone

S~yrene

ug/Kg

(Dry Wt)

Oetectlon

Limit

NO 12

NO 12

ND 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

ND 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

ND 6

NO 6

NO 6

ND 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 12

NO

NO 30

rm 12

NO 12

NO 12

NO

NO 12

Au- A) r·l

?

TIERRA-A-017567
Page: 22

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: r4-05-1~2

TEST NAME: Volatile Organics

...

SAMPLE IO: 2BK-S-PB01-12

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

Xy1enes

Methy1-Tert-Buty1-Ether(MTB£)

Tert-Butyl-Alcoho1 (TBA)

Carbon Disulfide

1,1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane

NO 12

ND 12

ND 12

NO 6

NO 6

Surrogates \Recovery

Toluene-de

Bromofluorobenzene

1,2-0ich1oroethane-d4

93

91

97

Comments: NO indicates the compound L5 not detected at the level

indicated.

TIERRA-A-017568
Page: 23

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: F4-0S-142

TEST NAME: Pesticides/PCB

SAMPLE 10: 2BK-S-PB01-12

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

ANALYSIS DATE:

QC BATCH #:

05/18/94

2248

Results lon

Aldrin

alpha-SHC

beta-SHC

Chlordane

delta-SHC

ga'mma-9HC

4,4'-000

4,4'-00E

4,4'-00T

~l.eldr~r.

Endosul.far. •

Endosulfar. :1

Endosulfan sulfate

Endrin

Endrin aldehyde

Heptachlor

Heptachlor epoxl.de

Methoxychlor

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016

Aroclor-l221

Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-1248

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

Endrin Ketone

OecachlorObl.pnenyl

Detectl.on

ug/Kg Ll.mit

ND 2.1

NO 2.1

NO 2. 1

NO 2. 1

NO 2.1

NO 2.1

NO 4.2

NO 4.2

NO 4.2

NO 4.2

rJo 2.1

NO 4.2

~m 4.2

NO 4.2

ND 2. 1

NO - ,

.:. ..

NO 2 . !

NO 21

NO 210

NO 42

NO 42

NO 42

ND 42

NO 42

NO 42

NO 42

ND 2. 1

'\, Recovery

----------

70

Comments: U or NO indl.cates compound l.S not detected at level l.ndl.cated.

When unl.ts are ug/Kg, ~esults are ~eported or. a dry wel.ght basl.s.

TIERRA-A-017569
Page: 6

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: P4-05-1~J

TEST NAME: Metals

SAMPLE IO: 2BK-S-PB01-50

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

ANALYSIS DATE: OS/25/94

Results in mg/Kg

Dry Wt.

Antimony

Aluminum

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

·Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium,

Vanadium

Zinc

ND

11000

3.4

66

NO

NO

7900

19

10

23

23000

13

7800

490

ND

20

1800

NO

ND

290B

NO

27

49

Detection

Limit

1.3

13

1.3

0.63

0.63

0.63

13

1.3

1.3

.3 • 2

13

6.3

13

0.63

O. 13

5. 1

63

0.63

1.3

1.3

1.3

1.3

2.5

Comments: NO indicates the compound lS not detected at the level

indicated.

AH. A, r- If,

TIERRA-A-017570
Page: 7

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVlCES

EDISON, NJ

(908) 225·2000

Work Order: F4-0S-14J

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Neutrals

SAMPLE IO: 2BK-S-PB01-SO

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

l\NALYSIS Ol\TE: 05/19/94

Result.s in

Acenaphthene

Acenapht.hylene

Anthracene

Benzidine

Benzo(a)Anthracene

Benzo(b)Fluoranr.hene

Benzo(k)Fluoranthene

Benzo(a)Pyrene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

bis(2-Chloroet.hyl)Ether

bis(2-Chloroet.hoxy)Methane

bis(2-Et.hylhexyl)Phthalar.e

bls(2-Chlorolsopropyl)Ether

4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Et.her

But.yl Benzyl Phthalace

4-Chloroanl1lne

2-Chloronaphthalene

4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether

Chrysene

.Oibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Oibenzofur-an

Oi-n-butylphthalate

l,2-0ichlorobenzene

l,3-0ichlorobenzene

1,4-0ichlorobenzene

J,J'-Oichlorobenzidlne

Oier.hylphthalat.e

Oimethylphthalat.e

2,4-0initrotoluene

2,6-0inir.rotoluene

Ol-n-Octylphr.halate

1,2-0lphenylhydrazlne

Fluorant.hene

Fluorene

Hexachlorobenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

\.lg/Kg

(Or-yWt)

llOJ

Detect-:.on

Llmlt

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 840

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

ND 420

Aft.A) f-/1

TIERRA-A-017571
Paqe: 8

Company:

Date:

Clieat Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

Wo~k O~ae~: F4-0S-l4J

TEST NAME: Acid/B ••• Neutrals

SAMPLE IO: 2BK-S-PBOl-50

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

:.

Hexachloroethane

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

Indeno(1.2,3-cd)pyrene

Isopho~one

2-Methylnaphthalene

Naphthalene

2-Nitroaniline

J-Nitroaniline

4-Nitroaniline

Nitrobenzene

N-nitroso-dimethylamine

N-Nitrosodipropylamine

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

1.2. 4-Trichlorobenzene

Benzoic Acid

Benzyl Alcohol

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

2-Chlorophenol

2.4-0ichlorophenol

2,4-0imethylphenol

2,4-Dinitrophenol

A,6-0initro-2-methylphenol

2-Methylphenol

4-Methylphenol

2-Nitropnenol

4-Nitrophenol

Pentachlorophenol

Phenol

2,4,S-Trichlcrophenol

2,4,6-Trichlcrophenol

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 2100

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

NO 420

r-ro 2100

NO 2100

NO 2100

NO 2100

NO 2100

NO 2100

NO 2100

NO 420

NO 2100

NO 420

TIERRA-A-017572
Page: 9

company:

Date:

Cli.ent Job No.:

ITEN/Passa~c Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON, NJ

(908) 225-2000

Work Order: F4-0S-143

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Neutrals

SAMPLE 10: 2BK-S-PBOl-50

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

Surrogat:es \ Recovery

Nitrobenzene-d5

2-Fluorobiphenyl

Terphenyl-d14

Phenol-dS

2-Fluorophenol

Tribromophenol

69

83

lIS

83

67

107

Comments: NO indicat:es the compound lS not detected at the level

indicated.

TIERRA-A-017573
Paqe: 10

Company:

Date:

Cl ient Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

Jun. 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON, NJ

(908) 225·2000

Work Order: F4-0S-143

TEST NAME: volatile Orqanics

SAMPLE IO: 2B~-S-PBOl-50

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

ANALYSIS DATE:: 05/20/94

Results in

Acrolein

Acrylonitrile

Benzene

Bromoform

Bromomethane

Carbon Tetrachloride

Ch1orobenzene

Chlorodibromomethane

chloroethane

2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether

:::hloroform

Chloromethane

Dichlorobromomethane

1,l-Dich1oroethane

1,2-Dich1oroethane

1,1-Dichloroethene

1,2-Dich1oroethene

1,2-0ichloropropane

cis-1,3-0ichloropropene

trans-l,3-Dichloropropene

Ethylbenzene

Methylene Chloride

l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrach1oroethene

Toluene

1,1, 1-Trichloroethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene

Trich1orofluoromethane

Vinyl Chloride

Acetone

2-Butanone

Vl.nyl Acetate

2-Hexanone

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone

Styrene

ug/Kg

(Ory Wt)

Detection

Limit

NO 13

NO 13

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 13

NO 13

NO 32

NO 13

NO 13

NO 13

NO 13

NO 13

Atf.A. p.20

TIERRA-A-017574
Page: 11

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225·2000

Work Order: F4-05-1~3

TES~ NAME: Volatile Organics

SAMPLE ID: 2BK-S-PBDl-SD

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

Xylenes

Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether(MTBE}

Tert-Butyl-Alcohol (TBA)

Carbon Disulfide

1,1,1,2-Tetrachlorothane

ND 13

ND 13

NO 13

ND 6

NO 6

Surrogates 'tRecovery

Toluene-dS

Bromofluorobenzene

l,2-Dichloroethane-d4

114

91

101

Comments: NO indicates the compound 45 not detected at the level

indicated.

TIERRA-A-017575
Paq-: 12

Company:

Date:

Client .Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRW Inv.

June 16,1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 22502000

Work Order: F4-05-14J

TEST NAME: P••tieid ••/PCB

SAMPLE 10: 2BK-S-PBOl-50

SAMPLE DATE: 05/17/94

ANALYSIS DATE:

QC BATCH I:

05/18/94

2248

R~sults 1n

Aldrin

alpha-BHC

beta-BHC

Chlordane

delta-BHC

ga"mma-BHC

4,4'-000

4,4'-00£

4,4'-ODT

Dieldrin

Endosulfan I

Endosulfan II

Endosulfan sulfate

Endrin

Endrin aldehyde

Heptachlor

Heptachlor epoxide

Methoxychlor

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016

Aroclor-1221

Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-1248

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

Endrin Ketone

Surrogates

Oecachloroblphenyl

Detection

ug/Kg Limit

NO :2. 1

NO 2. 1

NO 2. 1

NO :2 .1

NO :2 • 1

NO :2 • 1

NO 4.2

NO 4.2

NO 4.2

NP 4.2

NO 2.1

NO 4.2

NO 4.2

NO 4.2

NO 4.2

NO 2.1

NO 2.1

NO 21

NO 210

NO 42

NO 42

NO 42

NO 42

NO 42

NO 42

NO 42

NO 4.2

" Recovery

76

Comments: U or NO indicates compound lS not detected at level indicated.

When units are ug/Kg, results are reported on a dr~ weight basis.

TIERRA-A-017576
rnINTERNATIONAL

TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES

CERTIFIC.ATE OF Al'JALYSIS

ITER/Passaic Tunnel HTlV Inv.

165 Fielderest Ave.

Edison. NJ 08837

Attn: Ms. Paulette Frank

Date: June 16. 1994

NJ Lab Certification ID-: 12064

Job No.: 529740 P.O. Number: 529740-06-01-04

This is the Certificate of Analysis for the follOWing samples:

Client Project 10:

Date Received:

Number of Samples:

Sample Type:

PASSAIC TUNNEL HTRV INV.

05/19/94

4

SOIL/VATER

I. Introduction

Samples were labeled as follows:

SAMPLE IDENtIFICATION

2BK-S-PBOI-IOO

2BK-S-PB01-100 MS

2BK-S-PBOI-IOO MSO

2BK-RB-0519

LABORATORY.

F4-05-162-01

F4-05-162-02

F4-05-162-03

F4-0S-162-04

Reviewed and Approved:

,LuIa: '::/))~t-L

Eileen S. Nemeth

Project: Hanager

Amencan Council of Independent Laboratones

Internatlonal AssoClatlon of Envuonmenlal Testlng Laboratones

Amencan AssoClatlon tor Laboratory Accreditation

I r If)

. ITAnalyt1cal 5emces • 165nelc1c:rest A~nue. Edison. NJ 08831. (201)225-2000 1181-'"

All 1<' 0').1 TIERRA-A-017577
Page: 5

Company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITER/Passaic Tunnel HTRV Inv.

June 16, 1994 .

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225·2000

York Order: F4-05-162

TEST NAME: Ketal.

SAMPLE 1D: 2BX-S-PB01-100

SAMPLE DATE: 05/19/94

ANALYSIS DATE: OS/24/94

.<-:"1~

·...r-.i

Antimony

Aluminum

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Results in mgtK&

Dry Wt.

ND

12000

NO

130

0,67

ND

22000

211

10

15

23000

15

7800

520

NO

21

3100

ND

ND

370B

ND

30

51

Detection

Limit

1.1

11

1.1

0.56

0,56

0,56

11

1.1

1.1

2,8

11

5,6

11

0.56

0.11

4,5

56

0.56

1.1

11

1.1

1.1

2,2

Comments: NO indicates the compound is not detected at the level

indicaeed.

682·\,.9

TIERRA-A-017578
Page: 6

Company:

Date:

Client Job No. :

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRY Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICA:. SERV1CES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225·2000

York Order: F4-0S-162

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Neutrals

SAMPLE ID: 2BK-S-PBOl-100

SAMPLE DATE: 05/19/94

ANALYSIS DATE: OS/20/94

Results in

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Anthracene

Benzidine

Benzo(a)Anthracene

Benzo(b)Fluoranthene

Benzo(k)Fluoranthene

Benzo(a)Pyrene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane

bis(2.Ethylhexyl)Phthalate

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether

4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether

Butyl Benzyl Phthalate

4-Chloroaniline

2-Chloronaphthalene

4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether

Chrysene

.Dibenzo (a,h)anthracene

Dibenzofuran

Di-n-butylphthalate

1,2·Dichlorobenzene

l.3-Dichlorobenzene

1.4-0ichlorobenzene

3.3'-Dichlorobenzidine

Diethylphthalate

Dimethylphthalate

2,4-0initrotoluene

2.6-Dinitrotoluene

Oi-n-Octylphthalate

l.2.Diphenylhydrazine

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Hexachlorobenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

ug/Kg

(Dry ~t)

63J

90J

Detection

Limit

NO 370

ND 370

ND 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

ND 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

370

ND 370

ND 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

370

ND 370

NO 370

ND 370

NO 740

NO 370

ND 370

ND 370

ND 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

Np 370

NO 370

ND 370

e

TIERRA-A-01 i579~9
Page: 7

Company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTR~ Inv.

June 16. 1994

529740

ED!SQN. NJ

(908) 225·2000

~ork Order: F4-05-:62

TEST NAME: Ac1djBase Neutrals

SAMPLE ID: 2BX.S-PB01.IOO

SAMPLE DATE: 05/19/94

Hexachloroethane

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene

Isophorone

2-Methylnaphthalene

Naphthalene

2-Nltroaniline

3-Nitroaniline

4-Nitroaniline

Nitrobenzene

N-nltroso-dimethylamine

N-Nitrosodlpropylamine

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

Phenanthrene

Pyrene'

l.2.4-Trichlorobenzene

Benzoic Acid

B.enzyl Alcohol

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

2-Chlorophenol

2.4-Dichlorophenol

2.4-Dimethylphenol

2.4-Dinitrophenol

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol

2-Methylphenol

4-Methylphenol

·2-Nitrophenol

4-Nitrophenol

Peneachlorophenol

Phenol

2,4.5-Trichloropheno1

2,4,6-Trichloropheno1 NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO 370

NO 370

Np 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

Nl! 370

NO 370

NQ 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

NO 370

NQ 1900

ND 370

NO 370

ND 370

370

370

1900

1900

190Q

1900

1900

1900

1900

370

1900

370

682"·69

TIERRA-A-017580
Page: 8

Company:

Date:

Client Job No. :

lTEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRw Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICA:. SERVI::E:

EDISON. NJ

(906) 225·2000

Work Order: F4-05-16~

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Neutrals

SAMPLE 10: 2BK-S-PBD1-1DO

SAMPLE DATE: 05/19/94

Surrogates , Recovery

Nitrobenzene-dS

2-Fluorobiphenyl

Terphenyl-d14

Phenol-d5

2-Fluorophenol

Tribromophenol

80

89

123

90

76

109

Comments: ND indicates the compound is not detected at the level

indicated.

~--'·1·1

TIERRA-A-017581
Page: 9

Company:

Date:

Client ,Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRY Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT Al~A.Ll'"TI::;-":'S2~;1:-=S

:EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

York O~der: F4-05-16:

TEST NAME: Volatile Organics

sAMPLE 10: 2BX-S-PB01-100

SAMPLE DATE: 05/19/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 05120194

Results in ug:/Kg

(Dry Wc)

Acrolein

Acrylonit:rile

Benzene

Bromoform

Bromomet:hane

Carbon Tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene

Chlorodlbromomethane

Chloroethane

2-Chloroethylvlnyl Ether

Chloroform

Chloromethane

Dichlorobromomethane

l,l-Pichloroethane

1.2-Dichloroet:hane

l,l-Pichloroethene

1,2-Dichloroethene

1.2-Dichloropropane

cis-l,3·Pichloropropene

trans·l,3·Dichloropropene

Et:hylbenzehe

Methylene Chloride

l,l,2.2·Tetrachloroet:hane

Tetrachloroet:hene

Toluene

l,l,l-Trichloroethane

1,1.2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene

Trichlorofluoromethane

Vinyl Chloride

Acetone

2-Butanone

Vinyl Acetate

2·Hexanone

4-Methyl-2-Pent:anone

Styrene

8M

Detection

Limit

ND 11

ND 11

ND 6

NP 6

6

ND 6

NP 6

ND 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

Np 6

NP 6

NO 6

NO 6

NP 6

NO 6

ND 6

NO 6

ND 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

NO 6

Np 6

NO 11

NO 11

ND 28

NO 28

NO 28

NO 28

NO 28

NO 28

AH. 8, r' b

68, '·89

TIERRA-A-017582
Page: 10

Company:

Date:

Client Job No. :

lTEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRY Inv.

June 16, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAl. S:::RVIC'ES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225·2000

Work Order: F4-05-162

TEST NAME: Volatile Organics

SAMPLE ID: 2BK-S-PB01-I00

S&~PLE DATE: 05/19/94

Xylenes

Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether(MTBE)

Tert-Butyl-Alcohol (TBA)

Carbon Disulfide

1,1,l,2-Tetrachloroethane

NO 28

NO 28

NO 28

NO 6

NO 6

Surrogates %Recovery

Toluene-d8

Bromofluorobenzene

1,2-0ichloroethane-d4

103

85

102

Comments: NO indicates the compound is not detected at the level

indicated.

TIERRA-A-01 iS8319
Page: 11

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passaic Tunnel HTRV Inv.

June 16. 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVICES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225·2000

York Order: F4-0S-162

TEST NAME: Pe.eicidesjPCB

SAMPLE ID: 2B~-S-PB01-100

SAMPLE DATE: 05/19/94

ANALYSIS DATE:

QC BATCH #:

05120/94

2250

Results in

Aldrin

alpha-BHC

beta-BHe

Chlordane

delta-BHC

gamma-BHC

4,4' -DDD

4.4'-DDE

4,4' -DDT

Dieldrin

Endosulfan I

Endosulfan II

Endosulfan sulfate

Endrin

Endrin aldehyde

Heptachlor

Heptachlor epoxide

Methoxychlor

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016

Aroclor-122l

Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-l248

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-l260

Surrogates

Decachlorobiphenyl

Detection

uglKg Limit

__ ~N=D 1.9

__ .....t.lNDLII: 1.9

__ -.a.N"""D 1. 9

__ ---&;ND~ 19

__ ----'"NDu.:; 1.9

__ -.o.:N_D 1. 9

__ ~ND& 3,7

__ ~N~D 3,7

__ ~ND& 3,7

__ ~N=D 3.7

__ ..LN~D 1.9

__ .........N:-:;D 3.7

__ ---&;N~D 3 . 7

__ .........N~D 3.7

__ .-..o;N"""D 3 . 7

__ ......t,;NLll:D 1.9

__ ....I.N:aD 1.9

__ ~N"",D 19

__ .......:.Na:;D190

__ -.L!.NDI/It. 37

__ ~N"",D 37

__ --.&lND"'" 3 7

__ --->.:N=D 37

__ ----l,;N=D 37

__ ........N=D 37

__ ---:.:N=D 37

% Recovery

73

Comments: U or ND indicates compound is not detected at level indica~ed.

When units are ug!Kg, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

AU. 'B ) p.&>

TIERRA-A-017584
mINTERNATIONAL

, TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION

A.l\TALYTICF.L

SERVICES

CERTIF1CJcrE OF ANALYSIS

,w,

ITEN/Passiac Tunnel HTR~ Inv.

c/o IT Corp.

165 Fieldcrest Ave.

Edison, NJ 08837

Attn: Hr Paulette Frank

Date: July 26, 1994

NJ Lab Certification IO*: 12064

Job No.: 529740 P.O. Number: 529740

This is the Certificate of Analysis for the following samples:

Client Project ID:

Date Received:

Number of Samples:

Sample Type:

PASSAIC TUNNEL HTRY INV.

06/27/94

5

SOIL/YATER

I. Introduction

Samples were labeled as follows:

SAMPLE IDEt~IFICATION

2BK-S-OBI-02

2BK-S-OBI-02 MS

2BK-S-OBI-02 MSD

2BK-S-OBI-04

2BK-RB-0627

LABORATORY ~

F4-06-293-01

F4-06-293-02

F4-06-293-03

F4-06-293·04

F4·06-293-05

Reviewed and Approved:

'L~9a/~

Eileen S. Nemeth

Project Manager

Amencan CounCll o! lndependenl Laboretones

lntemauonal Assoc1anon 01 Enwonrnental Testing Laboratones

Amencan ASSOClCI!lonlor Laboratory Accreditation

rr Analytical Services • 165 Fieldc:rest Avenue. Edison. NJ 08837 • (908) 225-2000

4H. C,p., TIERRA-A-017585
Page: 7

Company:

Data:

Client: Job No.:

lTEN/passiac Tunn~l HTRV Inv.

July 26. 1994

529740

IT ANALYTI CJ--:' s::r:'Vl =::.s

EDISON, NJ

(908) 225-200J

York Order: F4-06-293

TEST NAME: Hatala

SAMPLE 10: 2B~-S-OB1-02

SAMPLE DATE: 06/27/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 07/05/94

Antimony

Aluminum

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Results in mg!Kg

Dry Wt.

NO

6060

3,1

711

NO

1,2

28100

SO

5,5

47,S

10700

258

3210

221

0.65

22

671

ND

NO

199B

NO

229

479

rDetection

Limit

1.0

10

1.0

0,50

0,50

0,50

10

2.0

1.0

2,5

10

5.0

10

0.50

0,10

4,0

50

0,50

1.0

10

1,0

1.0

4,0

Comments: NO indicates the compound is not detected at the level

indicated.

TIERRA-A-017586
Page: 8

Company:

Date:

Client Job No. :

ITEN/Passiae Tunnel HTRV lnv.

July 26, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAl. SEP.V1~

EDISON, NJ

(908) 22~2000

York Order: F4-06-293

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Neutrals

SAMPLE 10: 2Bt-S-OBI-02

SAMPLE DATE: 06/27/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 07/05/94

Results in

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthy1ene

Anthracene

Benzidine

Benzo(a)Anthracene

Benzo(b)Fluoranthene

Benzo(k)Fluoranthene

Benzo(a) Pyrene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether

bis(2·Chloroethoxy)Methane

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether

4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether

Butyl Benzyl Phthalate

2-Chloronaphthalene

4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether

Chrysene

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Oi-n-buty1phthalate

1,,2 - Dichlorobenzene

l,3-Dichlorobenzene

l,4-0ich1orobenzene

3,3'-Oich1orobenzidine

Oiethylphthalate

Oimethy1phthalate

2,4-0initroto1uene

2,6-Dinitrotoluene

Di-n-Octylphtha1ate

l,2-Dipheny1hydrazine

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Hexachlorohenzene

Hexach1orobutadiene

Hexachloroethane

Hexach1orocyc1opentadiene

uglJ(&

(Dry lolt)

SOOJ

170J

1300J

ND

3200

3600

3100

3900

1700

330J

160J

3000

920J

7600

580J

Detection

Limit

1700

1700

1700

1700

1700

1700

POO

1700

1700

ND 1700

NO 1700

1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

1700

NO 1700

ND 1700

1700

1700

NO 1700

Np 1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

ND 3300

NO 1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

ND 1700

ND 1700

1700

1700

ND 1700

NO 1700

1700

NO 1700

681·',89

TIERRA-A-017587
Page: 9

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

lTEN/Passlac Tunnel HTRV Inv.

.July 26. 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICJJ.. SW"~'\1:::S

EDISON, NJ

(908) 225-2000

Vork Order: F4-06-29J

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Reutrals

SAMPLE 10: 2BE·S-OBl-02

SAMPLE OATE: 06/27/94

Indeno(1.2.3·cd)pyrene

lsophorone '

Naphthalene

NItrobenzene

N-nitroso-d~ethyiamine

N-Nltrosodipropyiamine

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

2-Chlorophenol

2.4-0ichlorophenol

2.4-0imethylphenol

2.4-0Inltrophenol

4,6-Dlnitro-2-methylphenol

2-Nit,rophenol

4.NItrophenol

Pentachlorophenol

Phenol

2,4.S·Trlchlorophenol

2,4,6·Trichlorophenol

Surrogates

Nltrobenzene-d5

2-Fluoroblphenyl

Terphenyl-d14

Phenol·dS

2-Fluorophenol

Trlbromophenol

lZOO

170J

5000

5800

, Recovery

65

85

90

90

75

80

1700

NO 1700

Comments: NO Indicates the compound is not detected at the level

indicated.

1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

ND 1700

ND 1700

1700

1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

1700

Nt> 1700

NO 8300

NO 8300

ND 1700

NO 8300

NO 8300

NO 1700

NO 8300

NO 1700

At+.C,f·Lf

682,'-a.

TIERRA-A-017588
hgt.: 10

Company:

Datt.:

Client Job No. :

ITEN/Passiac Tunnel HTRY Inv.

July 26, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL S:RVIcr::.,

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

York Order: F4-06-293

TEST NAME: Volatile Organics

SAMPL&> ID: 2B~-S-OBI-02

SAMPLE DATE: 06/27/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 06128194

Detection

Results in u~lKg Limit

(Dry Wt)

Acrolein

Acryloni trile

Benzene

Bromoform

Bromomethane

Carbon Tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene

Chlorodibromomethane

Chloroethane

2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether

Chloroform

Chloromethane

Oichlorobromomethane

l.l-Dichloroethane

1.2-Dichloroethane

l.l-Dichloroethene

l,2-Dichloroethene

1.2-Dichloropropane

cis-l,3-0ichloropropene

trans-l,3-0ichloropropene

EthylbenzeneMethylene Chloride

1,1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

l,l,l-Trichloroethane

1.1,2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene

Trichlorofluoromethane

Vinyl Chloride

Acetone

2-Butanone

Vinyl Acetate

2-Hexanone

4-Methyl-2·Pentanone

Styrene

3BJ

NO 50

NO 50

NO 5

NO 5

ND 5

NO 5

NO 5

ND 5

ND 5

ND 5

NO 5

ND 5

ND 5

NO 5

NO 5

ND 5

ND 5

ND 5

ND 5

ND 5

ND 5

5

ND 5

NO 5

1J 5

NO 5

ND 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

50 10

ND 10

58 10

NO 10

NO 10

ND 10

TIERRA-A-017589
Page: 11

Company:

Date:

Client .Job No. :

lTEN/p •••iac Tunnel BTRV Inv.

July 16. 1994

529740

IT AN ALYTI:::l'.l. 5:;:;:'\1 ::E:;

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225·2000

York Order: F4-06-293

t

TEST NAME: Volatile Organics

SAMPLE 10: 2B~-S-OBI-02

SAMPLE DATE: 06/17/94

Xylenes

Methyl.Tert-Butyl-Ether(KTBE)

Tert-Butyl-Alcohol (TRA)

Carbon Disulfide

l,l,l,2.Tetrachloroethane

NO 10

ND 10

NO 10

NO 5

NO 5

Surrogates 'Recovery

Toluene-d8

Bromofluorobenzene

l,2-Dichloroethane·d4

135

73

96

Comments: ND indicates the compound is not detected at the level

indicated.

TIERRA-A-017590
Page: 12

Company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passiac Tunnel HTRV Inv.

July 26, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SEF.--lI::1:S

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225--2000

Vork Order: F4-06-293

TEST NAME: Pesticides/PCB

SAMPLE 10: 2B~-S-OB1-02

SAMPLE DATE: 06/27/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 06/29/94

Results in

Aldrin

alpha-BHC

beta-BHC

Chlordane

delta-BHC

gamma-BHC

4,4' -ODD

4,4' -DOE

4,4' -DOT

Dieldrin

Endosulfan I

Endosulfan II

Endosulfan sulfate

Endrin

Endrin aldehyde

Heptachlor

Heptachlor epoxide

Methoxychlor

Toxaphene

Aroclor-1016

Aroclor·1221

Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242

Aroclor-1248

Aroclor-1254

Aroclor-1260

Surrogates

Oecachlorobiphenyl

USIK&

:LOJ

2.4J

3.2J

280

720

360

320

Detection

Limit

36 1.6

NO 1.6

2,2 1.6

ND 16

NO 1.6

15 1.6

3.3

15 3.3

13 3.3

B.7

ND 1.6

24 3,3

3,3

3.3

ND

5.8 1.6

38 1.6

llJ 16

Np 160

33

NO 33

NO 33

NO 33

33

33

33

~ Recovery

110

Comments: U or NO indicates compound is not detected at level indicated.

Yhen units are ug!Kg, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

662'-69

TIERRA-A-017591
Page: 30

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/la.alae Tunnel HTRV Inv.

July 26. 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERVlcrs

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-~OOO

Wotk Oraer; F4-06-293

TEST NAME: Hetala

SAMPLE ID: 2BX-S-OB1-04

SAMPLE DATE: 06/27/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 07/01/94

Results in mg/Kg

Dry WOe.

Antimony

Aluminum

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

LOB

6560

'3 , 1

252

NO

0.97

23500

40,9

4,7B

40,6

11100

199

2850

206

0.34

17.7

729

0,508

ND

183B

NO

258

296

Detection

Limit

1.0

10

1.0

0,50

0,50

0,50

10

1.0

2.5

10

5.0

10

0,50

0.10

4.0

50

0.50

1.0

lQ

1.0

1.0

2,0

Comments: NO indicates the compound is not detected at the level

indicated,

6e, ;;

TIERRA-A-017592
Page: 31

Company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passiac Tunnel HTRY Inv.

July 26, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SERV1C1:S

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

York Order: F4-06-293

TEST NAME: Acid/Base Neutrals

SAMPLE 10: 2B&-S-OBI-04

sAMPLE DATE: 06/27/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 07105/94

Results in

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Anthracene

Benzidine

Benzo(a)Anthracene

Benzo(b)Fluoranthene

Benzo(k)Fluoranthene

Benzo(a)Pyrene

Benzo(g,h,i)pery1ene

bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether

bis(2_Chloroethoxy)Methane

bis(2_Ethylhexyl)Phthalate

bis(2_Chloroisopropyl)Ether

4-Bromopheny1 Phenyl Ether

Butyl Benzyl Phthalate

2_Chloronaphthalene

4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether

Chrysene

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Oi.-n-butylphthalate

l,2-0ichlorobenzene

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

3,3'_Dichlorobenzidine

Oiethylphthalate

Dimethylphthalate

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

2,6-Din1trotoluene

Oi_n_Octylphthalate

l,2-Diphenylhydrazine

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Hexachlorobenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

Hexachloroethane

Hexach1orocyclopentadiene

ug!K&

(Dry Wt)

1200J

190J

1800

4000

4BOQ

4200

5200

1900

300J

4100

1070J

ND

9900

940J

Detection

Limit

1700

1700

1700

ND POD

1700

1700

1700

1700

1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

1700

NO 1700

ND 1700

ND 1700

Np 1700

NO 1700

1700

1700

1700

ND 1700

ND 1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

NP 1700

NO 1700

NO 1700

ND 1100

NO 1700

1700

1700

1700

ND 1700

NO 1700

ND 1700

TIERRA-A-017593
Page: 33

Company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITER/P •• siac Tunnel HTRq Inv.

July 26, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SEP.VlCES

EDISON, NJ

(906) 225-2000

qork Order: F4-06-293

TEST NAME: Volatile Organics

SAMPLE 10: 2~-S-OBI-04

SAMPLE DATE: 06/27/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 06/28/94

Results in

Acrolein

Acrylonitrile

Benzene

Bromoform

Bromomethane

Carbon Tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene

Chlorodibromomethane

Chloroethane

2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether

Chloroform

Chloromethane

Oich1orobromomethane

l,l-Dichloroethane

1, 2-Dichloroethane

1,1-Dichloroethene

1.2-Dichloroethene

1.2-Dichloropropane

cis-l.3-Dichloropropene

trans-l,3-Dichloropropene

Ethylbenzene

Methylene Chloride

l,l.2.2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

.Toluene

l,l,l-Trichloroethane

l,l,2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene

Trichlorofluoromethane

Vinyl Chloride

Acetone

2-Butanone

Vinyl Acetate

2-Hexanone

4-Hethyl-2-Pentanone

Styrene

uglKi

(Dry Wt)

4BJ

Detection

Limit

NO 50

NO 50

NO 5

ND 5

NO 5

NO 5

5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

ND 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

ND 5

NO 5

NO 5

NO 5

89 10

NO 10

10

ND 10

NO 10

ND 10

Aff· (r· 11

':'A~.-_::

TIERRA-A-017594
Page: 34

company:

Date:

Client Job No.:

ITEN/Passiac Tunnel HTRY Inv.

July 26, 1994

529740

IT ANAlYTICAL SERV1CES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

Vork Order: F4-06-293

TEST NAME: Volatile Organic.

SAMPLE "'ID: 2BK-S-OBI-04

SAMPLE DATE: 06/27/94

Xy1enes

Methy1-Tert-Buty1.Ether(MTBE)

Tert-Buty1-A1coho1 (TBA)

Carbon Disulfide

1.1.1.2-Tetrach1oroethane

ND 10

ND 10

ND 10

24 5

NO 5

Surrogates 'Recovery

Toluene-dB

Bromofluorobenzene

1.2-Dich1oroethane-d4

113

70

101

Comments: ND indicates the compound is not detected at the level

indicated.

AH. C; f·12

582"·89

TIERRA-A-017595
Page: 35

Company:

Det:e:

Client Job Ro. :

ITER/Pas.lac Tunnel HTR~ Inv.

July 26, 1994

529740

IT ANALYTICAL SER\7I::ES

EDISON. NJ

(908) 225-2000

~ork Order: F4-06-293

TEST NAME: P••tlcld ••/pCB

SAMPLE 10: 2~-S-OBI-04

SAMPLE DATE: 06/27/94

ANALYSIS DATE: 06/29/94

Results in

Aldrin

alpha-BRC

beta-BRC

Chlordane

delta-BHC

gamma-BHC

4,4' -ODD

4,4' -DOE

4,4' -DOT

Dieldrin

Endosulfan I

Endosulfan II

Endosulfan sulfate

Endrln

Endrln aldehyde

Heptachlor

Heptachlor epoxide

Methoxychlor

Toxaphene

Aroclor-IOl6

Aroclor-l22l

Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-l242

Aroc1or-1248

Aroc1or-1254

Aroclor-1260

Surrogates

Decachlorobiphenyl

Detection

uglKg Limit

1.5J

__ ---<1 1...2 ......,.-_-....-'"

7,1

4.5

3,8

1400

440

390

45 1.6

1.6

8.3 1.6

ND 16

NO 1.6

NO 1.6

20 3,3

3,3

3,3

24 3,3

NO 1.6

NO 3,3

3.3

3.3

ND 3,3

14 1.6

48 1.6

24 16

NO 160

ND 33

ND 33

ND 33

ND 33

33

33

33

, Recovery

112

Comments: U or NO indicates compound is not detected at level indicated.

When units are ug/Kg, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Aft. C, p' /3

682 '·89

TIERRA-A-017596
·(J!.Juanfer-:G

En"ronmt."nr",J

~nkl""'

September 21t 1994

Mr. John Golden

International Technology

Corporation

165 Fieldcrest Avenue

Edison, NJ 08837

PROJECT NUMBER: 035873

P.O. NUMBER: 529740

Dear Mr. Golden:

Enclosed are the results of the analyses for Soil samples, sampled

8/11/94, for the following sample(s):

Number of Sample(s}

10

Sample "Matrix

SOIL

The sample(s) were received under chain of custody at Enseca-East Laboratory on August 11, 1994. A brief description of the Quality Assurance/

Quality Control and method references employed by Enseco is contained within

the report. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results and

is considered an integral part of this report.

All analyses subcontracted to Quanterra-New Jersey are found in

appendix one of this report.

All analyses subcontracted to Quanterra-Tennessee are found in

appendix two of this report.

All analyses subcontracted to Teledyne Brown Engineering are

found in appendix three of this report.

Please refer to this project by the Enseeo-East Laboratory Project Number

to expedite any future discussions. We will be happy to answer any questions

or concerns that you may have.

~~iileen Nemeth ~Q2~

Program Manager

ENSECO-EAST LABORATORY

TIERRA-A-017597
TCl Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HAI

lab 10: 035873-0001-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 23 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Chloromethane NO ug/kg 11

Bromomethane NO ug/kg 11

Vinyl Chloride NO ug/kg 11

Chloroethane NO ug/kg 11

Methylene chloride NO ug/kg 5.7

Acetone NO ug/kg 11

Carbon d1sul fide NO ug/kg 5.7

1,I-Dichloroethene NO ug/kg 5.7

1,1-0ichloroethane NO ug/kg 5.7

1,2-0ichloroethene (cis/

trans) NO ug/kg 5.7 Chloroform NO ug/kg 5.7

1,2-0ichloroethane NO' ugi'kg 5.7

2-Butanone NO ug/kg 11

1,1,I-Trichloroethane NO ug/kg 5.7 Carbon tetrachloride NO ugjkg 5.7 Vinyl Acetate NO ug/kg 11 Bromodichloromethane NO ug/kg 5.7

1,2-Dichlorofropane NO ug/kg 5.7 cis-l,3-Dich oropropene NO ug/kg 5.7 Trichloroethene NO ug{kg 5.7 Dibromochloromethane NO ug{kg 5.7 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO ug/kg 5.7

Benzene NO ug/kg 5.7 trans-l,3-0ichloropropene NO ug/kg 5.7 Bromoform NO ugjkg 5.7

4-Methyl-Z-Pentanone NO ug/kg 11 2-Hexanone NO ug/kg 11 1,I,Z,2-Tetrachloroethane NO ug/kg 5.7 Tetrachloroethene NO ug/kg 5.7 Toluene NO ugjkg 5.7 Chlorobenzene NO ug/kg 5.7

Ethyl benzene NO ug/kg 5.7 Styrene NO ug/kg 5.7

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017598
Tel Volatile Organics

Ensec<'l

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8240

(cant.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HAI

035873-0001-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 23 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Xylenes (total) NO ug/kg 5.7

Acrolein NO ug/kg 57

Acrylonitrile NO ug/kg 57

Surrogate Recovery

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 99 "

Toluene-d8 109 "

4-Bromofluorobenzene 92 "

Percent moisture is 13". All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017599
TCl Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA2

lab 10: 035873-0003-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Parameter

Chloromethane

Bromomethane

Vinyl Chloride

Chloroethane

Methylene chloride

Acetone

Carbon disulfide

l,l-Oichloroethene

l.l-Oichloroethane

1,2-0ichloroethene (cis/

trans)

Chloroform

1,2-0ichloroethane

2-Butanone

l,l,l-Trichloroethane

Carbon tetrachloride

Vinyl Acetate

BromodichloTomethane

1,2-Dichloropropane

cis-l,3-0ichloropropene

Trichloroethene

Oibromochloromethane

1,1,2-Trlchloroethane

Benzene

trans-l,3-Dichloropropene

Bromoform

4-Hethyl-2-Pentanone

2-Hexanone

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

Chlorobenzene

Ethyl benzene

Styrene

Percent moisture ;s 111.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported 8y: Salman Qaz;

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 21 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units limit

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug'lkg 5.6

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

NO ug/kg 5.6

All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017600
Enst\~l)

Tel Volatile Organics

Client Name:

Cl ient 10:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8240

(cont. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA2

035873-0003-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 21 AUG 94

....

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Xylenes (total) NO ug/kg 5.6

Acrolein NO ugjkg 56

Acrylonitrile NO ug/kg 56

Surrogate Recovery

It2-Dichloroethane-d4 101 %

Toluene-d8 120 % v

4-Bromofluorobenzene 86 %

Percent moisture is 11%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

v • Surrogate recovery outside of QC limits due to sample matrix interference as

verified by reanalysis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017601
Ensec(\

TCl Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA3

lab 10: 035873-0004-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

Chloromethane NO ug/kg 12

Bromomethane NO ug/kg 12

Vinyl Chloride NO ug/kg 12

Chloroethane NO ug/kg 12

Methylene chloride NO ug/kg 6.2

Acetone NO U9/k9 12

Carbon disulfide NO ug/kg 6.2

l,l-Oichloroethene NO ug/kg 6.2

I,I-01chloroethane NO U9/k9 6.2 I,2-0ichloroethene (cisl

trans) NO ug/kg 6.2 Chloroform NO U9/k9 6.2 I,2-0ichloroethane NO U9/k9 6.2 2-Butanone NO U9/k9 12

1,1,I-Trichloroethane NO U9/kg 6.2 Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/k9 6.2 .- Vinyl Acetate NO U9/1<9 12 .. -" Bromodichloromethane NO U9/1<9 6.2

1,2-01chloro~ropane NO u9/1<9 6.2 cis-I,3-0ich oropropene NO U9/1(9 6.2 Trichloroethene NO u9/1(9 6.2 Dibromochloromethane NO ug/I<g 6.2 I,I,2-Trichloroethane NO u9/1<9 6.2 Benzene NO U9/1<9 6.2 trans-l,3-0ichloropropene NO U9/1<9 6.2 Bromoform NO u9/1(9 6.2 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone NO U9/1<9 12 2-Hexanone NO U9/kg 12 I,I,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO ug/k9 6.2 Tetrachloroethene NO ug/k9 6.2 Toluene NO U9/1<9 6.2 Chlorobenzene NO u9/1<9 6.2 Ethyl benzene NO u9/1<9 6.2 Styrene NO U9/1<9 6.2

Percent moisture is 20". All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

AU.!» p' b

TIERRA-A-017602
Enseco

Client Name: International

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA3

Lab ID: 035873-0004-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Tel Volatile Organics

Method 8240

(cont.)

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Xylenes (total) NO ug/kg 6.2

Acrolein NO ug/kg 62

Aeryl oni tril e NO ug/kg 62

Surrogate Recovery

1,2-0ichloroethane-d4 97 %

Toluene-dB 105 %

4-Bromofluorobenzene 89 %

Percent moisture is 20%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA • Not Applicable

ND • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017603
Tel Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HA4

lab ID: 035873-000S-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

Chloromethane NO ugjkg 13

Bromomethane. NO ugjkg 13

Vinyl Chloride NO ugjkg 13

Chloroethane NO ug/kg 13

Methylene chloride NO ug/kg 6.5

Acetone NO ug/kg 13

Carbon disulfide NO ug/kg 6.5 I,I-Dichloroethene NO ug/kg 6.5 I,I-Oichloroethane NO ugjkg 6.5 I,2-0ichloroethene (cisl

trans) NO ug/kg 6.5 Chloroform NO ugjkg 6.5 I,2-Dichloroethane NO ugjkg 6.5 2-Butanone NO ug/kg 13 I,I,I-Trichloroethane NO ug/kg 6.5 Carbon tetrachloride NO ugjkg 6.5 Vinyl Acetate NO ug/kg 13 Bromodichloromethane NO ug/kg 6.5 1,2-0ichloro~ropane NO ug/kg 6.5 cis-I,3-Dich oropropene NO ug/kg 6.5 Trichloroethene NO ug/kg 6.5 Oibromochloromethane NO ug/kg 6.5 I,I,2-Trichloroethane NO ugjkg 6.5 Benzene NO ug/kg 6.5 trans-I,3-Dichloropropene NO ug/kg 6.5 Bromoform NO ugjkg 6.5 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone NO ug/kg 13 2-Hexanone NO ugjkg 13 I,I.2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO ugjkg 6.5 Tetrachloroethene NO ug/kg 6.5 Toluene NO ug/kg 6.5 Chlorobenzene NO ugjkg 6.5 Ethylbenzene NO ugjkg 6.5 Styrene NO ug/kg 6.5

Percent moisture is 23%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Oetected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Oebra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017604
Tel Volatile Organics

Enseco

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab ID:

Matrix:

Method 8240

(cont. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA4

035873-0005-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94 Prepared: NA

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Analyzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

'-r

,

Xylenes (total)

Acrolein

Acrylonitrile

NO

NO

NO

ug/kg

ugjkg

ugjkg

6.5

65

65

Surrogate

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4

Toluene-dB

4-Bromofluorobenzene

Recovery

98

III

82

"

"

"

Percent moisture is 23". All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qaz; Approved ,By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017605
EnseC(1

Tel Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA6

Lab IO: 035873-0007-SA

Matrix: SOIL

r -_

- >.

Parameter

Chloromethane

Bromomethane

Vinyl Chloride'

Chloroethane

Methylene chloride

Acetone

Carbon disulfide

I,I-Oichloroethene

I,l-Oichloroethane

l,2-0ichloroethene (cis/

trans)

Chloroform

I,2-0ichloroethane

2-Butanone

l,l,l-Trichloroethane

Carbon tetrachloride

Vinyl Acetate

Bromodichloromethane

l,2-0ichloropropane

cis-l,3-0ichloropropene

Trichloroethene

Oibromochloromethane

1,I,2-Trichloroethane

Benzene

trans-l,3-0ichloropropene

Bromoform

4-Hethyl~2-Pentanone

2-Hexanone

I,I,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

Chlorobenzene

Ethylbenzene

Styrene

Percent moisture 1s 55%.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang

.

'-~~.}

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units Limit

NO ug/kg 22

NO ug/kg 22

NO ug/kg 22

NO ug/kg 22

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 22

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg ·11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO' uglkg 11

NO ug/kg 22

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 22

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 22

NO ug/kg 22

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

NO ug/kg 11

All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Approved By: Debra Cutler

Alt. D, f·ID

TIERRA-A-017606
TCl Volatile Organics

Client Name:

Client ID:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8240

(cont.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA6

03S873-0007-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

...

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Xylenes (total) NO ug/kg 11

Acrolein NO ug/kg 110

Acryl onitril e NO ug/kg 110

Surrogate Recovery

1,2-0ichloroethane-d4 95 %

Toluene-dB 122 % v

4-Bromofluorobenzene 76 "

Percent moisture 1s 55". All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

v - Surrogate recovery outside of QC limits due to sample matrix interference as

verified by reanalysis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO - Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang Approved By: Debra Cutler

AH.D, p,ll

TIERRA-A-017607
~..)""':;.'.;.

"""':"-

Enseco

TCl Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA7

Lab 10: 035873-0008-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units Limit

NO ug/kg 14

NO ug/kg 14

NO ug/kg 14

NO ug/kg 14

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 14

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ugjkg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 14

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 14

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 14

NO ug/kg 14

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

NO ug/kg 6.9

Parameter

Chloromethane

Bromomethane

Vinyl Chloride

Chloroethane

Methylene chloride

Acetone

Carbon disulfide

1,1-0ichloroethene

l,l-Oichloroethane

1,2-0ichloroethene (cisl

trans)

Chloroform

1,2-Dichloroethane

2-Butanone

1,I,I-Trichloroethane

Carbon tetrachloride

Vinyl Acetate

Bromodichloromethane

1,2-Dichloropropane

cis-l,3-0ichloropropene

Trichloroethene

Oibromochloromethane

I,I,2-Trichloroethane

Benzene

trans-l,3-0ichloropropene

Bromoform

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone

2-Hexanone

I,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

Chlorobenzene

Ethylbenzene

Styrene

Percent moisture is 28%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017608
TCL Volatile Organics

Client Name:

CHent 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8240

(cant.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA7

035B73-000B-SA

SOIL

Sampled:' 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Xylenes (total) NO ug/kg 6.9

Acrolein NO ug/kg 69

Acryl oni tril e NO ug/kg 69

Surrogate Recovery

ItZ-Oichloroethane-d4 96 %

Toluene-dB 123 % v

4-Bromofluorobenzene 69 % v

Percent moisture 1$ 281. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

v • Surrogate recovery outside of QC limits due to sample matrix interference as

verified by reanalysis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qaz1 Approved By: Debra Cutler

A~f.D) p.l~

TIERRA-A-017609
Tel Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA8

Lab 10: 035873-0009-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Parameter

Chloromethane

Bromomethane

Vinyl Chloride

Chloroethane

Methylene chloride

Acetone

Carbon disul fide

l,l-Oichloroethene

l,l-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethene (cis/

trans)

Chloroform

1,2-Dichloroethane

2-Butanone

1,1,I-Trichloroethane

Carbon tetrachloride

Vinyl Acetate

Bromodichloromethane

1,2-Dichloropropane

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

Trichloroethene

Oibromochloromethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Benzene

trans-I,3-0ichloropropene

Bromoform

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone

2-Hexanone

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

Chlorobenzene

Ethyl benzene

Styrene

Percent moisture is 21%.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi

Sampled: II AUG 94

Received: II AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units Limit

NO U9/kg 13

NO ug/kg 13

NO ug/kg 13

NO ug/kg 13

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 13

NO U9/k9 6.3

NO U9/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ugjkg 6.3

NO ug/k9 13

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 13

NO U9/k9 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/k9 6.3

NO U9/k9 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/k9 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 13

NO ug/kg 13

NO U9/k9 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO U9/kg 6.3

NO ug/kg 6.3

NO U9/k9 6.3

All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017610
Tel Volatile Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8240

(cont.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA8

035873-0009-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Xylenes (total) ND ug/kg 6.3

Acrolein NO ug/kg 63 Acrylonitrlle NO ug/kg 63

Surrogate Recovery

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 92

Toluene-dB 141

"

"

v

4-Bromofluorobenzene 62 "

v

Percent moisture is 21%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

v • Surro~ate recovery outside of QC limits due to sample matrix interference as

verlfied by reanalysis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017611
Ensec0

TCl Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA9

Lab 10: 035873-00IO-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units Limit

Chloromethane

Bromomethane

Vinyl Chloride

Chloroethane

Methylene chloride

Acetone

Carbon disulfide

1,1-0ichloroethene

1,1-0ichloroethane

1,2-0ichloroethene (cis/

trans)

Chloroform

I,2-0ichloroethane

2-Butanone

1,1.1-Trichloroethane

Carbon tetrachloride

Vinyl Acetate

Bromodich1oromethane

1,2-0ichloropropane

cis-l,3-0ichloropropene

Trichloroethene

Oibromochloromethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Benzene

trans-I,3-0ichloropropene

Bromoform

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone

2-Hexanone

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

Chlorobenzene

Ethyl benzene

Styrene

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ugjkg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ugjkg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ugjkg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

13

13

13

13

6.6

13

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

13

6.6

6.6

13

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

13

13

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

6.6

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

Au. b, p,lb

TIERRA-A-017612
TCl Volatile Organics .:......,";r'.' r'I __ ~ .'r-:",Jr.

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8240

(cont.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA9

035873-0010-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

Xylenes (total) NO ug/kg 6.6

Acrole1n NO ug/kg 66 Acrylonitrile - NO ug/kg 66

Surrogate Recovery

1,2-01chloroethane-d4 93 %

Toluene-dB 139 % v 4-Bromofluorobenzene 60 % v

Percent moisture 1s 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

v • Surrogate recovery outs1de of QC limits due to sample matrix interference as

verified by reanalysis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qaz1 Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017613
Enseco

TCL Semivolntile Organics

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HAI

Lab 10: 035873-000I-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Parameter

Phenol

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether

2-Chlorophenol

l,3-0ichlorobenzene

l,4-0ichlorobenzene

1.2-Dichlorobenzene

2-Methylphenol

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)

ether

4-Methylphenol

N-N1t roso-d i-npropyl amine .

Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene

Isophorone

2-Nitrophenol

2,4-Dimethylphenol

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane

2,4-Dichlorophenol

I,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

Naphthalene

4-Ch 1oroan 11 ine

Hexachlorobutadiene

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

2-Methylnaphthalene

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

2,4,S-Trichlorophenol

2-Chloronaphthalene

2-Nitroanil ine

Dimethyl phthalate

Acenaphthylene

3-Ni troanil ine

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Result

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Units Limit

ug/leg

ug/kg

ug/leg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

3BO

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

380

1800

380

1800

380

380

1800

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017614
TCl Semivo1ati1e Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HAI

035873-0001-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Acenaphthene NO ug/kg 380

2,4-D1nitropheno1 NO U9/k9 1800

4-Nitropheno1 NO U9/k9 1800

Dibenzofuran NO U9/1<9 380 2,4-01nitroto1uene NO ug/I<g 380 2,6-Dinitroto1uene NO ug/kg 380 01ethy1 phthalate NO U9/1<9 380 4-Chloropheny1 phenyl

ether NO u9/1<9 380 Fluorene NO ug/I<g 380 4-Nitroani11ne NO ug/I<g 1800 4,6-0in1tro-2-

u9/1<9 methyl phenol NO 1800

N-N1trosodiPhen~lamine NO U9/1<9 380 4-Bromopheny1 p eny1

ether NO U9/k9 380 Hexach1orobenzene NO u9/1<9 380 Pentachlorophenol NO U9/1<9 1800 Phenanthrene 1100 ug/kg 380 Anthracene NO u9/1<9 380 9H-Carbazo1e NO U9/k9 380 Di-n-buty1 phthalate NO u9/1<9 380 F1uoranthene 1800 u9/1<9 380 Pyrene 1700 U9/1<9 380 Butyl benzyl chthalate NO U9/1<9 380 3,3'-D1chloro enzid1ne NO U9/k9 760 Benzo(a}anthracene 910 U9/1<9 380 b1s(2-Ethy1hexyl)

phthalate NO U9/1<9 380 Chrysene 720 u9/1<9 380 01-n-octy1 phthalate NO U9/1<9 380 Benzo(b)f1uoranthene 1400 ug/I<g 380

Benzo Ik1nuaranthene NO U9/k9 380 BenzD a pyrene 670 U9/1<9 380 Indeno( ,2,3-cd)pyrene NO u9/1<9 380

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017615
Tel Semi volatile Organics

Client Name:

Client ID:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8270

{cant.}

International Technology Corporation

2BK-$-HAI

035873-000I-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene NO ug/kg 380

Benzo{g,h,i)perylene NO ug/kg 380

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-d5 71 %

2-Fluorobiphenyl 97 %

Terphenyl-d14 107 %

Phenol-d5 84 %

2-Fluorophenol 91 %

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 105 %

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017616
Tel Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

Ensc:"c\.)

.........'·....,I~..: ... ,'mf".c

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK~S-HA2

lab to: 035873-0003-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Phenol NO ug/kg 1800 d

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether NO ug/kg 1800 2-Chloro~henol NO ug/kg 1800 1,3-0ich orobenzene NO ug/kg 1800 1,4-0ichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 1800 I,Z-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 1800 2-MethYl~henol NO ug/kg 1800 bis(2-eh oroisopropyl)

1800 ether NO ug/kg 4-Hethylphenol NO ug/kg 1800 N-Nitroso-di-npro~,lamine NO ug/kg 1800 Hexac oroethane NO ug'lkg 1800 Nitrobenzene NO ug/kg 1800 Isophorone NO ug/kg 1800 2-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 1800 2,4-0imethylphenol NO ug/kg 1800 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane NO ug/kg 1800 2,4-0ichlorophenol NO ug/kg 1800 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 1800 Naphthalene NO ug/kg 1800 4-Chloroaniline NO ug/kg 1800 Hexachlorobutadiene NO ug/kg 1800 4-ehloro-3-meth,lphenol NO ug/kg 1800 2-Meth,lnaphtha ene NO ug/kg 1800 Hexach orocyclopentadiene NO ug/kg 1800 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NO ug/kg 1800 2,4,5-Trichlorofhenol NO ug/kg 9000 2-Chloronafhtha ene NO ug/kg 1800 2-Nitroani ine NO ug/kg 9000 Dimethyl phthalate NO ug/kg 1800 Acenaphthylene NO ug/kg 1800

Percent moisture is Ill. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

d • All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun Approved By: Lori Ann QUinn

TIERRA-A-017617
Ense\),

Tel Semivolati1e Organics ,\. ....."t":'lln..:: "--,'r""

Method 8270

~cont. )

Client Name: Internat iDna 1 Technology orporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA2

lab 10: 035873-0003-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 pre,ared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

3-Nitroanll ine NO ugjkg 9000

Acenaphthene NO ug/kg 1800

2,4-0initrophenol NO ug/kg 9000

4-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 9000

Oibenzofuran NO ug/kg 1800

2,4-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 1800

2,6-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 1800

Oiethyl phthalate NO ugjkg 1800

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether NO ugjkg 1800

Fluorene NO ugjkg 1800

4-Nitroaniline NO ug/kg 9000

4,6-0initro-2-

methyl phenol NO ug/kg 9000

N-NitrosodiPhen~lamine NO ugjkg 1800

4-Bromophenyl p enyl

ether NO ugjkg 1800

Hexach16robenzene NO ug/kg 1800

Pentachlorophenol NO ugjkg 9000

Phenanthrene NO ug/kg 1800

Anthracene NO ugjkg 1800

9H-Carbazole NO ug/kg 1800

Oi-n-buthl phthalate NO ug/kg 1800

Fluorant ene NO ug/kg 1800

Pyrene NO ug/kg 1800

Butyl benzyl ~hthalate NO ugjkg 1800

3,3'-Oichloro enzidine NO ugjkg 3700

Benzo{a)anthracene NO ugjkg 1800

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate NO ug/kg 1800

Chrysene NO ug/kg 1800 Oi-n-octyl phthalate NO ug/kg 1800

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 4100 ug/kg 1800

Benzo(k)fluoranthene NO ug/kg 1800

Percent moisture is 11%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dikun Approved By: lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017618
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client IO:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA2

035873-0003-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 24 AUG 94

Result

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Units Limit

Benzo{alPyrene 1900 ug/kg 1800

Indeno~ ,2,3-cd)pyrene NO ug/kg 1800 Oibenz a,h)anthracene NO ug/kg 1800 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NO ug/kg 1800

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-d5 45 ~

2-Fluorobiphenyl 88 ~

Terphenyl-d14 106 ~

Phenol-d5 53 ~

2-Fl uorophenol 82 ~

2,4,6-Tri bromophenol 77 % .

Percent moisture is llX. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: leonardDikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

Alt. D) p' n

TIERRA-A-017619
Enseco

TCl Semivolatile Organics '" (.c.'mmo: Cl"'~t" ..

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA3

Lab 10: 035873-0004-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 Pre,ared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units lim1t

Phenol NO ug/kg 2100 u

bis{2-Chloroethyl) ether NO ug/kg 2100

2-Chloro,henol NO ug/kg 2100

1,3-0tch orobenzene NO ug/kg 2100

1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 2100

1,2-0ichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 2100

2-MethylvhenOl NO ug/kg 2100

bis{2-Ch oroisopropyl)

ether NO ug/kg Z100

4-Methylphenol NO ug/kg 2100

N-Nttroso-di-npro~flamine NO ugJkg 2100

Hexac oroethane NO ug/kg 2100

Nitrobenzene NO ug/kg 2100

Isophorone NO ug/kg 2100 2-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 2100

2,4-0imethyl phenol NO ug/kg 2100

bis{2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane NO ug/kg 2100 2,4-0ichlorophenol NO ug/kg 2100

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 2100

Naphthalene NO ug/kg 2100 4-Chloroani1 ine NO ug/kg 2100

Hexachlorobutadiene NO ug/kg 2100

4-Chl oro-3-meth{l phenol NO ug/kg 2100

2-Meth{lnaphtha ene NO ug/kg 2100

Hexach orocyclopentadiene NO ug/kg 2100

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NO ug/kg 2100

2,4,5-Trichloro,henol NO ug/kg 10000

2-Chloronavhtha ene NO ug/kg 2100 2-Nitroani ine NO ug/kg 10000 Dimethyl phthalate NO ug/kg 2100 Acenaphthylene NO ug/kg 2100

Percent moisture is 20%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

u • All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun Approved By: lori Ann Quinn

AH. 1), r·2'1

TIERRA-A-017620
Ensec(l

Tel Semivolatile Organics -\ ",--\'rnll~": .....l'~f'.'l"'

Method 8270

~cont. }

Client Name: International Technology orporation

Client 10: 2SK-S-HAJ

lab IO: 035873-0004-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Rece;ved: 11 AUG 94 Prefared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

3-Nitroanlline NO ugjkg 10000

Acenaphthene NO ugjkg 2100

2,4-0initrophenol NO ugjkg 10000

4-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 10000

Oibenzofuran NO ug/kg 2100

2,4-0in1trotoluene NO ugjkg 2100

2,6-01nitrotoluene NO ugjkg 2100

Oiethyl phthalate NO ugjkg 2100

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether NO ugjkg 2100

Fluorene NO ugjkg 2100

4-Nitroaniline NO ugjkg 10000

4,6-0initro-2-

methyl phenol NO ugjkg 10000

N-Nitrosod1Phen~lamine NO ug/kg 2100

4-Bromophenyl p eny1

ether NO ug/kg 2100

Hexachlorobenzene NO ug/kg 2100

Pentachlorophenol NO ug/kg 10000

Phenanthrene 7500 ug/kg 2100 Anthracene 2200 ug/kg 2100 9H-Carbazo1e NO ug/kg 2100

Oi-n-buthl phthalate NO ug/kg 2100 F1uorant ene 8200 ugjkg 2100

pyrene 8600 ug/kg 2100

Butyl benzyl chtha1ate NO ug/kg 2100

3,3'-Oichloro enzidine NO ug/kg 4100

Benzo(a)anthracene 4400 ug/leg 2100

bis{2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate NO ug/kg 2100 Chrysene 4100 ug/kg 2100 Oi-n-octy1 phthalate NO ug/kg 2100 Benzo(b}fluoranthene 7200 ugjkg 2100

Benzo(k)fluoranthene NO ug/kg 2100

Percent moisture 1s 20~. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dileun Approved By: Lori Ann QUinn

Au, 'D, f.25"

TIERRA-A-017621
Tel Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Cl ient ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA3

035873-0004-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 24 AUG 94

...

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Benzo(a)pyrene 4000 ug/kg 2100

IndenO~I,2,3-Cd)pyrene NO ugjkg 2100

Dibenz a,h)anthracene NO ugjkg 2100

Benzo(g,h,;)perylene NO ugjkg 2100

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-dS 49 %

2-Fluorobiphenyl 86 %

Terphenyl-dI4 98 %

Phenol-d5 59 %

2-Fluorophenol 81 %

2,4,6-Tri bromophenol 78 %

Percent moisture ;s 20%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

ND • Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Dikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017622
Ense\':-(J

TCl Semivolatile Organics .l" "'-.·"1.Il"it: ....,' .....'['"

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA4

lab 10: 035873-0005-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 Pre~ared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Rerorting

Parameter Result Units imit

Phenol NO ugjkg 2100 d

bis(2-Ch1oroethy1) ether NO ugjkg 2100

2-Chlorofhenol NO ugjkg 2100

1,3-Dich orobenzene NO ugjkg 2100

1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/kg l100

l,l-Dichlorobenzene NO ugjkg 2100

2-MethylfhenOl NO ug/kg 2100

bis(2-Ch oroisopropyl)

ether NO ugjkg 2100

4-Methy1phenol NO ugjkg 2100

N-Nitroso-di-npro~f1amine. NO ug/kg 2100

Hexac oroethane NO ug1kg 2100

Nitrobenzene NO ug/kg 2100

Isophorone NO ug/kg 2100

2-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 2100

2,4-0imethylphenol NO ugjkg 2100

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane NO ug/kg 2100

2,4-Dichlorophenol NO ug/kg 2100

l,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 2100

Naphthalene NO ugjkg 2100

4-Chloroaniline NO ug/kg 2100

Hexachlorobutadiene NO ugjkg 2100

4-Chloro-3-meth,lpheno1 NO ugjkg 2100

2-Meth,lnaphtha ene NO ug/kg 2100

Hexach orocyclopentadiene NO ugjkg 2100

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NO ug/kg 2100

2,4,5-Trichloro~henOl NO ug/kg 10000

2-Chlorona~htha ene NO ug/kg 2100

2-Nitroani ine NO ug/kg 10000

Dimethyl phthalate NO ug/kg 2100

Acenaphthylene NO ug/kg 2100

Percent moisture is 23%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

d • All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Oikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017623
Enseco ~~

Tel Sem;volatileOrgan;cs A (<....mmli: Comro.U''' \"l'm

Method 8270

(cont.)

ent Name: International Technology Corporation

ent 10: 2BK-S-HA4

IO: 035873-000S-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

rix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 Prefared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94 Ana yzed: 24 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

ameter Result Uni ts limit

itroaniline NO ug/kg 10000 naphthene NO ug/kg 2100 -Dinitrophenol NO ugjkg 10000 itrophenol NO ugjkg 10000 enzofuran NO ugjkg 2100 -Din1trotoluene NO ugjkg 2100 -Oin1trotoluene NO ug/kg 2100 thyl phthalate NO ugjkg 2100 hlorophenyl phenyl

ugjkg ther NO 2100

orene NO ug/kg 2100 itroanil ine NO ugjkg 10000 -Dinitro-2-

ethyl phenol NO ug/kg 10000 itrosodiPhen~lamine NO ug/kg 2100 romophenyl p enyl

ther NO ugjkg 2100 achlorobenzene NO ugjkg 2100 tachlorophenol NO ug/kg 10000 ,1anthrene 2500 ugjkg 2100 nracene NO ugjkg 2100 :arbazole NO ugjkg 2100 n-buthl phthalate NO ug/kg 2100 :Jrant ene 3700 ug/kg 2100 ~ne 4400 ug/kg 2100 yl benzyl chthalate NO ugjkg 2100 '-01chloro enzidine NO ugjkg 4300 zo(a)anthracene 2100 ug/kg 2100 (2-Ethylhexyl)

,thalate 7600 ug/kg 2100 (sene NO ugjkg 2100 ,-octyl phthalate NO ugjkg 2100 ~o(b)fluoranthene 5000 ugjkg 2100 ~o{k)fluoranthene NO ug/kg 2100

:ent moisture is 23%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis. asis.

• Not Detected

Jrted By: Leonard Dikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

Au. D) p.Z'6

TIERRA-A-017624
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA6

Lab 10: 035873-0007-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: II AUG 94

Received: II AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Phenol NO ug/kg 2900 d

bis{2-Chloroethyl) ether NO ug/kg 2900

2-ChlorofhenOl NO ug/kg 2900

1,3-0ich orobenzene NO ugjkg 2900

1,4-01chlorobenzene NO ugjkg 2900

1,2-01chlorobenzene NO ug/kg 2900

2-Hethylfhenol NO ugjkg 2900

bis(2-Ch oro1sopropyl)

ether NO ug/kg 2900

4-Methylphenol NO ug/kg 2900 N-Nitroso-di-npro~,lam1ne NO ugJkg 2900

Hexac oroethane NO ugjkg 2900

Nitrobenzene NO ugjkg 2900

Isophorone NO ugjkg 2900

.-, 2-Nitrophenol NO ugjkg 2900

2,4-0imethyl phenol NO ug/kg 2900

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane NO ugjkg 2900 2,4-0ichlorophenol NO ug/kg 2900

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO ugjkg 2900 Naphthalene NO ug/kg 2900 4-Chloroaniline NO ug/kg 2900 Hexachlorobutadiene NO ug/kg 2900 4-Chl oro-3-meth,l phenol NO ug/kg 2900

2-Heth,lnaPhtha ene NO ugjkg 2900 Hexach ~rocyclopentad1ene NO ug/kg 2900 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NO ugjkg 2900 2,4,5-Trichlorofhenol NO ugjkg 14000

2-Chlorona~htha ene NO ugjkg 2900 2-Nitroani ine NO ugjkg 14000

Oimethh

'phthalate NO ugjkg 2900 Acenap thylene NO ug/kg 2900

Percent moisture is 55%. All results and limi ts are reported on a dry weight basis.

d • All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences.

NO • Not Oetected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017625
Tel Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA6

035873-0007-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

3-Nitroaniline NO ug/kg 14000 Acenaphthene NO ug/kg 2900 2,4-0initrophenol NO ug/kg 14000 4-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 14000 Oibenzofuran NO ug/kg 2900 2,4-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 2900 2,6-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 2900 Oiethyl phthalate NO ug/kg 2900 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether NO ug/kg 2900 Fluorene NO ug/kg 2900 4-Ni troan 11; ne NO ugJkg 14000 4,6-0initro-2-

methyl phenol NO ug/kg 14000 N-NitrosodiPhen~lamine NO ug/kg 2900 4-Bromophenyl p enyl

ether NO ug/kg 2900 Hexachlorobenzene NO ug/kg 2900 Pentachlorophenol NO ug/kg 14000 Phenanthrene NO ug/kg 2900 Anthracene NO ug/kg 2900 9H-Carbazole NO ug/kg 2900 Di-n-but~l phthalate NO ug/kg 2900 Fluorant ene NO ug/kg 2900 Pyrene NO ug/kg 2900 Butyl benzyl Chthalate NO ug/kg 2900 3,3'-Oichloro enzidine NO ug/kg 5900 Benzo(a)anthracene NO ug/kg 2900 bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate 15000 ug/kg 2900 Chrysene NO ug/kg 2900 Oi-n-octyl phthalate NO ug/kg 2900 Benzo(b)fluoranthene NO ugjkg 2900 Benzo(k)fluoranthene NO ug/kg 2900

Percent moisture is 55%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

ND • Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Oikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017626
Ense-c

TCl Semtvolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cant.)

International Technology Corporation

ZBK-S-HA6

035873-0007-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Benzo(alPyrene NO ug/kg 2900

Indeno( ,2,3-cd)pyrene NO ug/kg 2900

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene NO ug/kg 2900

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NO ug/kg 2900

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-d5 83 %

2-Fluorobiphenyl 90 "

Terphenyl-dl4 97

Phenol-d5 98

"

"

2-Fluorophenol 94 %

2, 4, 6-Tr1 bromophenol 78 "

Percent moisture is 55%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard D1kun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017627
Client Name: International

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA7

lab 10: 03s873-000S-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Enst>C(1

TCl Semivolatile Organics A ....,.,r~·'lInl::, l.-l·rT'.r".J~·.

Method 8270

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94 Pre~ared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94 Ana yzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units limit

NO ug/kg 920 d

NO ug/kg 920

NO ug/kg 920

NO ug/kg 920

NO ug/kg 920

NO ug/kg 920

NO ug/kg 920

NO ugjkg ·920

NO ugjkg 920

NO ug/kg 920

NO ug1kg 920

NO ugjkg 920

NO ug/kg 920

NO ugjkg 920

NO ugjkg 920

NO ugjkg 920

NO ugjkg 920

NO .ugjkg 920

NO ugjkg 920

NO ug/kg 920

NO ugjkg 920

NO ug/kg 920

NO ugjkg 920

NO ugjkg 920

NO ug/kg 920

NO ugjkg 4400

NO ug/kg 920

NO ug/kg 4400

NO ugjkg 920

NO ugjkg 9Z0

Parameter

Phenol

b;s(2-Chloroethyl) ether

2-Chlorophenol

1,3-0ichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

I,Z-Dichlorobenzene

2-Methylphenol

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)

ether

4-Methylphenol

N-Nitroso-di-npropylami ne

Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene

Isophorone

2-Nitrophenol

2,4-Dimethylphenol

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane

2,4-Dichlorophenol

1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene

Naphthalene

4-Chloroaniline

Hexachlorobutadiene

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

2-Methylnaphthalene

Hexachlorocycl0-

pentadiene

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

2,4.5-Trichlorophenol

2-Chloronaphthalene

2-Ni troan iline

Dimethyl phthalate

Acenaphthylene

Percent moisture is 28%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

d • All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Oikun Approved By: Lori Ann QUinn

TIERRA-A-017628
Tel Semivolatlle Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA7

035873-0008-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

ORY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

3-Nitroanil ine NO ugjkg 4400

Acenaphthene NO ugjkg 920

2,4-0initrophenol NO ugjkg 4400

4-Nitrophenol NO ugjkg 4400

Oibenzofuran NO ugjkg 920

2,4-0initrotoluene NO ugjkg 920

2,6-0initrotoluene NO ugjkg 920

0iethyl phthalate 1200 ug/kg 920

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether NO ug/kg 920

Fluorene NO ug/kg 920

4-Nitroaniline . NO ug/kg 4400

4,6-0initro-2-

methyl phenol NO ug/kg 4400

N-NitrosodiPhen~lamine NO ug/kg 920

4-Bromophenyl p eny1

ether NO ug/kg 920

Hexachlorobenzene NO ug/kg 920 Pentachlorophenol NO ug/kg 4400

Phenanthrene NO ug/kg 920

Anthracene NO ug/kg 920

9H-Carbazole NO ug/kg 920

Oi-n-but~l phthalate 4700 ug/kg 920 B

Fluorant ene NO ug{kg 920

Pyrene NO ug{kg 920

Butyl benzyl chthalate NO ug/kg 920 3,3'-Oiehloro enz1dine NO ugjkg 1800

Benzo(a}anthracene NO ug/kg 920 bis(2-Ethylhexyl}

phthalate NO ug/kg 920 Chrysene NO ug{kg 920 Di-n-octyl phthalate NO ug/kg 920 Benzo{b)fluoranthene 1500 ug/kg 920

Percent 'moisture is 28%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

B • Compound is also detected in the blank.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: leonard 0ikun Approved By: Lor; Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017629
Ensecc

Tel Semivolatile Organics

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94 Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units limit

Client Name:

Client 10:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cant. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA7

035873-0008-SA

SOIL

Parameter

Benzo(klfluoranthene

Benzo(a pyrene

Indeno{ ,2,3-cd)pyrene

Dibenz{a,h)anthracene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

Surrogate

Nitrobenzene-d5

2-Fluorobiphenyl

Terphenyl-dl4

Phenol-d5

2-Fluorophenol

2,4,6-Tribromophenol

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

Recovery

84

94

107

94

93

89

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ugjkg

ug/kg

920

920

920

920

920

"

"

"

" .

"

Percent moisture is 28%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Dikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017630
Enseco Tel Semivolatile Organics J.. 1...1'!'""lIn;:: ..:: ~'"'!'lr-.,)

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 28K-S-HA8

Lab ID: 035873-0009-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 Prefared: 16 AUG 94 Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

Phenol NO ug/kg 420 bis(2-Chloroethyl} ether NO ug/kg 420 2-Chloro~henol NO ug/kg 420 1,3-D1ch orobenzene NO ug/kg 420 1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 420 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 420 2-MethYlfhenOl NO ugjkg 420 bis(2-Ch oroisopropyl}

NO ug/kg -420 ether

4-Methylphenol NO ugjkg 420 N-Nitroso-di-npro~,lamine NO ugjkg 420 Hexac oroethane NO u!Tjkg 420 Nitrobenzene NO ugjkg 420 Isophorone NO ug/kg 420

';"~ ... 2-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 420 2,4-Dimethylphenol NO ugjkg 420 ;'.

".'W bis(2-Chloroethoxy}-

methane NO ug/kg 420 2.4-0ichlorophenol NO ug/kg 420 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO ugjkg 420 Naphthalene NO ug/kg 420 4-Chloroani1ine NO ug/kg 420 HexachlorDbutadiene NO ug/kg 420 4-ChlDrD-3-meth,1 phenol NO ug/kg 420 2-Meth,lnaphtha ene NO ug/kg 420 Hexach orocyclopentadiene NO ug/kg 420 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NO ug/kg 420 2,4,S-Trichlorofhenol NO ug/kg 2000 2-ChlorDna~htha ene NO ug/kg 420 2-NitrDani ine NO ug/kg 2000 Oimethhl phthalate NO ug/kg 420 Acenap thylene NO ug/kg 420 3-Nitroanl1ine NO ug/kg 2000

Percent moisture is 21". All results and 11mits are reported Dn a dry weight basis.

NO • NDt Detected

RepDrted By: leonard Oikun ApprDved By: lDri Ann QUinn

A+I.]), p- 3~

TIERRA-A-017631
Enseco

Tel Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client IO:

lab ID:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA8

035873-0009-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Rerorting

Parameter Result Units 1m1t

Acenaphthene NO ug/kg 420

2,4-0initrophenol NO ug/kg 2000

4-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 2000

Oibenzofuran NO ug/kg 420

2,4-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 420

2,6-01nitrotoluene NO ugjkg 420

Oiethyl phthalate 1000 ug/kg 420

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether NO ugjkg 420

Fluorene NO ug/kg 420

4-N1troanil ine NO ug/kg 2000

4,6-01nitro-2-

methyl phenol NO· ug1kg 2000

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NO ug/lcg 420

4-Bromophenyl phenyl

ether NO ug/kg 420

Hexachlorobenzene 860 ug/lcg 420

Pentachlorophenol NO ug/kg 2000

Phenanthrene NO ug/kg 420

Anthracene NO ugjkg 420

9H-Carbazole NO ugjkg 420

Oi-n-butyl phthalate NO ugjkg 420

Fluoranthene NO ug/kg 420

Pyrene NO ug/kg 420

Butyl benzyl ghthalate NO ug/kg 420

3,3'-Oichloro enzidine NO ug/kg 830

Benzo(a)anthracene NO ugjkg 420

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate 810 ug/kg 420

Chrysene NO ug/kg 420

Di-n-octyl phthalate NO ug/kg 420

BenZO~b)fluoranthene 500 ug/kg 420

Benzo k)fluoranthene NO ug/kg 420

Benzo(a)pyrene NO ug/kg 420

Indeno(I,2,3-cd)pyrene NO ug/kg 420

Percent moisture is 21%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Oileun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017632
Ense((J

Tel Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cant.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA8

03S873-0009-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94 Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Oibenz(a,h)anthracene

Benzo(g,h,1)perylene

Surrogate

Nitrobenzene-dS

2-Fluorobiphenyl

Terphenyl-dI4

Phenol-dS

2-Fluorophenol

2,4, 6-Tri bromophenol

NO

NO

ug/kg

ug/kg

420

420

Recovery

73

98

"

118

"

"

84

85

"

125

"

"

I

Percent moisture 1s 21%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

I • Surrogate recovery outside of limits due to sample matrix interference.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Dikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017633
EnsecC'

TCl Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA9

Lab 10: 035873-0010-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

...

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Phenol NO ug/kg 880 d

bis{2-Chloroethyl) ether NO ug/kg 880

2-Chloro~henol NO

1,3-0ich orobenzene NO ug/kg 880

1,4-0ichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 880

1,2-0ichlorobenzene NO ug/kg S80

2-MethYl~henOl NO ug/kg 880

bis(2-Ch oroisopropyl}

ether NO ug/kg 880

4-Methylphenol NO ug/k9 8S0

N-Nitroso-di-nprO~Ylami ne NO ug/kg 880

Hexac loroethane NO ug-/k9 880

Nitrobenzene NO U9/k9 880

Isophorone NO U9/kg 880

2-Nitrophenol NO U9/k9 880

2,4-0imethylphenol NO ug/kg 880

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane NO ug/kg 880

2,4-0ichlorophenol NO ug/kg 880

l,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3700 ug/kg 880

Naphthalene NO ug/kg 880

4-Chloroaniline NO ug/kg 880

Hexachlorobutadiene NO U9/kg 880

4-Chloro-3-meth,lPhenol NO ug/kg 880

2-Meth,lnaphtha ene NO ug/k9 880

Hexach orocyclopentadiene NO ug/kg 880

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NO U9/k9 880

2,4,5-Trichloro~henol NO U9/kg 4200

2-Chlorona~htha ene NO ug/kg 880

2-Nitroani ine NO ug/k9 4200

Dimethyl phthalate NO ug/kg 880

Acenaphthylene NO ug/kg SSO

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and 1;m;ts are reported on a dry weight basis.

d • All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences.

ND • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017634
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA9

035873-0010-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

3-Nitroanil ine NO ug/kg 4200

Acenaphthene 2000 ug/kg 880

2,4-Dinitrophenol NO ug/kg 4200

4-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 4200

Oibenzofuran NO ug/kg 880

2,4-Dinitrotoluene NO ug/kg 880

2,6-Dinitrotoluene NO ug/kg 880

Oiethyl phthalate 4400 ug/kg 880

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether NO ug/kg 880

Fluorene NO ug/kg 880

4-Ni troanil ine NO ug/kg 4200

4,6-01n1tro-2- .

methyl pheno 1 NO ug/kg 4200

N-Nitrosod1Phenhlam1ne NO ug/kg 880

4-Bromophenyl p enyl

.... ""':.. , ether NO ug/kg 880

~ • I~

Hexachlorobenzene 5400 ug/kg 880

Pentachlorophenol NO ug/kg 4200

Phenanthrene 2000 ug/kg 880

Anthracene NO ug/kg 880

9H-Carbazole NO ug/kg 880

D1-n-but h

l phthalate NO ug/kg 880

Fluorant ene 3600 ug/kg 880

Pyrene 4800 ug/kg 880

Butyl benzyl chthalate NO ugjkg 880

3,3'-Dichloro enz1d1ne NO ugjkg 1800

Benzo(a)anthracene 4200 ugjkg 880 bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate 1500 ug/kg 880 Chrysene 4200 ug/kg 880 Oi-n-octyl phthalate NO ug/kg 880

Benzo~b~fluoranthene 13000 ug/kg 880

Benzo k fluoranthene NO ug/kg 880

Percent moisture is 2SX. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard D1kun Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

Aft.D'r,39

TIERRA-A-017635
Tel Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

(cont.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA9

035873-0010-SA

SOIL

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Parameter

Benzo(a)pyrene

Indeno(I,2,3-cd)pyrene

Dibenz(a,h}anthracene

Benzo(g,h,i}perylene

Surrogate

Nitrobenzene-d5

2-Fluorobiphenyl

Terphenyl-dl4

Phenol-d5

2-Fluorophenol

2,4,6-Tribromophenol

•

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94 Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94 Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units Limit

8100

3600

1300

3600

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

880

880

880

880

Enseco

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: leonard Oikun

Recovery

79

98

125

86

92

109

"

"

"

"

"

% .

Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

TIERRA-A-017636
Enseco

TCl Organochlor.ine Pesticides/PCBs

Method S080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HAI

lab ID: 035873-0001-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 29 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Rerorting

Parameter Result Units imit

alpha-SHC NO ug/kg 9.2

beta-BHC NO ug/kg 9.2

delta-SHC NO ug/kg 9.2

gamma-SHe (lindane) NO ug/kg 9.2

Heptachlor NO ug/kg 9.2

Aldrin NO ug/kg 9.2

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 9.2

Endosulfan I NO ug/kg 9.2

Dieldrin NO ug/kg . IS

4,4'-OOE NO ug/kg 18

Endrin NO ug/kg 18

Endosulfan II NO ug/kg IS

4,4'-000 ND u9"/kg IS

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg IS

4,4'-00T 31 ug/kg IS

Endrin ketone NO ug/kg IS

-~. Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 92

1.. ~.,.,. Chlordane NO ug/kg 92

Toxafhene NO ug/kg ISO

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/kg 92

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/kg 92

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/kg 92

Aroclor 1242 NO ugjkg 92

Aroclor 124S NO ugjkg 92

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg ISO

Aroclor 1260 430 ug/kg 180

.

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCX~ 73.4

Oecach orobiphenyl S8.4

"

"

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017637
TCl Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA2

lab 10: 035873-0003-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

alpha-BHC NO ug/kg 36 u

beta-SHe NO ugjkg 36

delta-SHC NO ug/kg 36

gamma-SHC (Lindane) NO ug/kg 36

Heptachlor NO ug/kg 36

Aldrin NO ug/kg 36

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 36

Endosul fan I NO ug/kg 36

Dieldrin NO ug/kg . 72

4,4'-OOE NO ug/kg 72

Endrin NO ug/kg 72

Endosulfan II NO ugjkg 72

4,4'-000 NO ug/kg 72

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 72

4,4'-00T 120 ug/kg 72

Endri n ketone NO ug/kg 72

Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 360

Chlordane NO ug/kg 360

Toxafhene NO ug/kg 720

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/kg 360

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/kg 360

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/kg 360

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/kg 360

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/kg 360

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg 720

Aroclor 1260 3800 ug/kg 1400 0

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCX~ 29.4 %

Decach orobiphenyl 179 % &

Percent moisture is 11%. A11 results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

& • Surrogate recovery is outside of control limits.

o • Compound quantitated using a secondary dilution.

u • All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017638
Enseco

Tel Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs A ......~.,."un~ ......'l.tmE'\oI

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-.S-HA3

Lab 10: 035873-0004-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 Pre~ared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 29 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

alpha-BHC NO ug/kg 1000 u

beta-SHC NO ug/kg 1000

delta-BHC NO ug/kg 1000

gamma-BHe (Lindane) NO ug/kg 1000

Heptachlor NO ug/kg 1000

Aldrin NO ug/kg 1000

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 1000

Endosulfan I NO ug/kg 1000

Dieldrin NO ug/kg 2000

4,4'-00E NO ug/kg 2000

Endrin NO ug/kg 2000

Endosulfan II NO ug/kg 2000

4,4'-000 NO' ug-/kg 2000

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 2000

4,4'-00T NO ug/kg 2000

Endri n ketone NO ug/kg 2000 : 1 ~_ Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 10000

.... .;,' Chlordane NO ug/kg 10000

Toxa~hene NO ug/kg 20000

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/kg 10000

Aroclor 1221

Aroclor 1232

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/kg 10000

Aroclor 124B

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg 20000

Aroclor 1260 45000 ug/kg 20000

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCXl NO "

H

Oecach orobiphenyl NO "

H

Percent moisture is 201. All results and limits are reported on a dry'weight basis.

H • Surrogate not detected because of required sample dilution.

u • All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Damarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017639
Enseco

Tel Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs "" C'l.tTTun.: (l'l-rn~r

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA4

lab 10: 035873-000S-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 prefared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 29 AUG 94

...

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

alpha-SHe NO ug/kg 2100 u

beta-SHC NO ug/kg 2100

delta-BHC NO ug/kg 2100

gamma-BHe (Lindane) NO ug/kg 2100

Heptachlor NO ug/kg 2100

Aldrin NO ug/kg 2100

Heptachlor epox1de NO ug/kg 2100

Endosulfan I NO ug/kg 2100

Oieldrin NO ug/kg 4100

4,4'-00E NO ug/kg 4100

Endri n NO ug/kg 4100

Endosulfan II NO

4,4'-000 NO' ug;'kg 4100

.. Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 4100

4,4'-00T NO ug/kg 4100

Endrin ketone NO ug/kg 4100 ,'""'- Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 21000

. ...-; Chlordane NO ug/kg 21000

Toxafhene NO ug/kg 41000

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/kg 21000

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/kg 21000

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/kg 21000

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/kg 21000

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/kg 21000

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg 41000

Aroclor 1260 120000 ug/kg 41000

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCXl NO "

H

Decach orobiphenyl NO "

H

Percent moisture is 23%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

H • Surrogate not detected because of required sample dilution.

u • All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO • Not Oetected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

. Au. D. r·'i~

TIERRA-A-017640
EnseG1

TCl Organochlo~ine Pesticides/PCBs

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Cli ent 10: 2BK-S-HA6

Lab 10: 035873-0007-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 Prefared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Re~orting

Parameter Result Units imit

alpha-BHC NO ug/kg 180 u

beta-BHC NO ug/kg 180

delta-BHC NO ug/kg 180

gamma-BHC (Lindane) NO ug/kg 180

Heptachlor NO ug/kg 180

Aldrin NO ug/kg 180

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 180

Endosulfan I NO ug/kg 180

Dieldrin NO ug/kg 360

4.4'-OOE 7400 ug/kg 3600 0

Endrin NO ug/kg 360

Endosulfan II" NO. ugJkg 360

4,4'-000 790 ug/kg 360

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 360

4,4'-00T 3700 ug/kg 360

Endri n ketone NO ug/kg 360 i:J Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 1800

Chlordane NO ug/kg 1800

Toxafhene NO ug/kg 3600

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/kg IBOO

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/kg 1800

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/kg 1800

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/kg 1800

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/kg 1800

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg 3600

Aroclor 1260 NO ug/kg 3600

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCX~ NO "

H

oecach orobiphenyl NO "

H

Percent moisture is 551. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

o • Compound quantitated using a secondary dilution.

H • Surrogate not detected because of required sample dilution.

u • All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Damarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017641
Enst'(\l

TCl Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs -\ ....\'~tn~ .....,',.....;'\,~r"

Method 8080

Client Name: Internat iona 1 Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA7

Lab ID: 035873-0008-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 Pre~ared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

alpha-SHe NO ug/kg 2200 u

beta-SHC NO ug/k.g 2200

delta-SHe NO ug/kg 2200

gamma-BHe (Lindane) NO ug/kg 2200

Heptachlor NO ug/kg 2200

Aldrin NO ug/kg 2200

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 2200

Endosul fan I NO ug/kg 2200

Dieldrin NO ug/kg 4400

4,4'-00E 73000 ug/kg 4400

Endrin NO ug/kg 4400

Endosulfan II NO ug/kg 4400

4,4'-000 NO ug/kg 4400

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 4400

4,4'-DOT 9400 ug/kg 4400

Endrin ketone NO ug/kg 4400

Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 22000

Chlordane NO ug/kg 22000

Toxa~hene NO ug/kg 44000

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/kg 22000

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/kg 22000

Aroclor 1232 NO

Aroclor 1242 NO

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/kg 22000

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg 44000

Aroclor 1260 NO ug/k.g 44000

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCX~ NO % H

Oecach orobiphenyl NO % H

Percent moisture is 28%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

H • Surrogate not detected because of required sample dilution.

u • All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

Alt. D, p'1b

TIERRA-A-017642
ErLC;e (\1

TCL Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs nlr., ... ,,~:t>.:. .,'~r.

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Cl ient 10: 2BK-S-HA8

Lab IO: 035873-0009-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 Pre~ared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

alpha-SHe NO ug/I<g 100 u

beta-SHC NO ug/kg 100

delta-SHC NO ug/kg 100

gamma-SHC (lindane) NO ug/kg 100

Heptachlor NO U9/kg 100

Aldrin NO ug/kg 100

Heptachlor epoxide NO u9/1<9 100

Endosulfan I NO ug/I<g 100

Dieldrin NO ug/I<g 200

4,4'-00E 480 ug/I<g 200

Endrin NO ug/kg 200

Endosulfan II NO ugjkg 200

4,4'-000 NO U9/k9 200

Endosulfan sulfate NO U9/k9 200

4,4'-00T 2000 ug/kg ZOO

- , Endrin ketone NO ug/I<g ZOO

Methoxychlor NO ug/I<g 1000

Chlordane NO ug/k9 1000

Toxa~hene NO ug/kg 2000

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/kg 1000

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/lc.g 1000

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/lc.g 1000

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/kg 1000

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/k9 1000

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg 2000

Aroclor 1260 NO ug/I<g 2000

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCX~ NO % H

Oecach orobiphenyl NO % H

Percent moisture is 21%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

H • Surrogate not detected because of required sample dilution.

u • All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

AH. D) r' L-f1

TIERRA-A-017643
.,.

t.nsecll

TCl Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs .:..\..~'rnln.: '--'.'~r'.r~

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Cl ient ID: 2BK-S-HA9

lab ID: 035873-0010-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94 Pre~ared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 25 AUG 94

ORY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

alpha-SHe NO ug/kg 2100 u

beta-SHe NO ugjkg 2100

delta-SHe NO ug/kg 2100

gamma-SHC (lindane) NO ug/kg 2100

Heptachlor NO ug/kg 2100

Aldrin NO ug/kg 2100

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 2100

Endosul fan I NO ug/kg 2100

Dieldrin NO ug/kg 4200

4,4'-DOE 6300 ug/kg 4200

Endri n NO ug/kg 4200

Endosulfan II NO ug/kg 4200

4,4'-000 NO ug.jkg 4200

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 4200

4,4'-00T 6800 ug/kg 4200

Endrin ketone NO ug/kg 4200

Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 21000

Chlordane NO ug/kg 21000

Toxa~hene NO ugjkg 42000

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/kg 21000

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/kg 21000

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/kg 21000

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/kg 21000

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/kg 21000

Aroclor 1254 NO ugjkg 42000

Aroclor 1260 NO ug/kg 42000

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

{TCX~ NO % H

Decach orobiphenyl NO % H

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

H • Surrogate not detected because of required sample dilution.

u • All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

AH.1>, p.L.ft

TIERRA-A-017644
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HAI

Lab ID: 03SS73-0001-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Parameter

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons

Result

440

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

mg/kg 92 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and lim~ts are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Joseph Persaud

TIERRA-A-017645
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA2

Lab 10: 035873-0003-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

Total Petrol eum

Hydrocarbons

Result

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Units limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

990 mg/kg 90 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 11%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basts.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Joseph Persaud

TIERRA-A-017646
Enseco

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HA3

Lab ID: 035873-0004-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Parameter

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons

Result

3800

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Units limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

mg/kg 500 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 20S. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Joseph Persaud

AU. D, f">1

TIERRA-A-017647
Ensec(l

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA4

Lab 10: 035873-0005-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons 2100 mgjkg 210 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 23%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Joseph Persaud

At!,. D , , S-l

p.

TIERRA-A-017648
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HA6

Lab ID: 035873-0007-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

2400 mg/kg 180 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 55%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Joseph Persaud

TIERRA-A-017649
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA7

Lab 10: 035873-000S-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Parameter Result

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons 590

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

mg/kg 110 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 28%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Joseph Persaud

TIERRA-A-017650
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA8

Lab 10: 035873-0009-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons 470 mgjkg 100 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 21X. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Joseph Persaud

TIERRA-A-017651
Enseco

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA9

Lab 10: 035873-0010-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

450 mg/kg 110 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Joseph Persaud

TIERRA-A-017652
Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HAI

Lab 10: 035873-0001-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analyt ieal Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 4940 mg/kg 11.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Antimony NO mg/kg 5.7 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Arsenic 8.6 mg/kg 0.57 7060 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94

Barium 388 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Beryllium 0.51 mg/kg 0.23 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cadmium 2.0 mg/kg 0.57 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Calcium 6100 mg/kg 57.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Chromium 38.9 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cobalt 7.1 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Copper 1720 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Iron 14700 mg/kg 11.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Lead 452 mg/kg 5.7 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Magnesium 1900 mg/kg 57;4 6eno 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Manganese 267 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Mercury 0.67 mg/kg 0.11 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Nickel 136 mg/kg 4.6 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

" .:---. Potassium NO mg/kg 574 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

-_...:-'

Selenium NO mg/kg 0.57 7740 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94 ,

Sil ver NO mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Sodium NO mg/kg 574 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Thallium NO mg/kg 0.57 7841 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Vanadium 29.8 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Zinc 1470 mg/kg 2.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

S • Reported value determined by method of standard addition.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

AH. D, p.51-

TIERRA-A-017653
Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA2

Lab 10: 035873-0003-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 3570 mg/kg 11.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Antimony 37.2 mg/kg 5.6 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Arsenic 10.5 mg/kg 2.2 7060 17 AUG 94 30 AUG 94

Barium 2300 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Beryllium 0.87 mg/kg 0.22 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cadmium 112 mg/kg 0.56 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Calcium 9460 mg/kg 56.0 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Chromium 249 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cobalt 19.7 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Copper 1550 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Iron 35900 mg/kg 11.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Lead 1460 mg/kg 5.6 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Magnesium 2140 mg/kg 56~0 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Manganese 439 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Mercury 5.7 mg/kg 0.22 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Nickel 1060 mg/kg 4.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Potassium NO mg/kg 560 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Selenium 10.0 mg/kg 2.8 7740 17 AUG 94 24 AUG 94

Silver 1.8 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Sodium 578 mg/kg 560 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Thall ium NO mg/kg 0.56 7841 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94 Vanadium 49.3 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Zinc 4020 mg/kg 2.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 11%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

TIERRA-A-017654
Ensecc~

Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA3

Lab 10: 035873-0004-SA Sampled: II AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: II AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

)

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 4640 mg/kg 12.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Antimony 39.7 mg/kg 6.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Arsenic 9.8 mg/kg 0.62 7060 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94

Barium 783 mg/kg 1.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Beryllium 0.44 mg/kg 0.25 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

.j Cadmium 12.9 mg/kg 0.62 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Calcium 15000 mg/kg 62.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

~{.:,'

:~ Chromium 171 mg/kg 1.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cobalt 10.3 mg/kg 1.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Copper 786 mg/kg 1.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Iron 25800 mg/kg 12.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Lead 959 mgjkg 6.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Magnesium 3050 mg/kg 62.3 60-10 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Manganese 323 mg/kg 1.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Mercury 1.3 mg/kg 0.12 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Nickel 429 mg/kg 5.0 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Potassium NO mg/kg 623 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Selenium 1.5 mg/kg 0.62 7740 17 AUG 94 22 AUG 94

Silver 1.3 mg/kg 1.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Sodium NO mg/kg 623 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Thallium NO mg/kg 0.62 7841 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Vanadium 76.0 mg/kg 1.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Zinc 1780 mg/kg 2.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 20~. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

TIERRA-A-017655
Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA4

Lab 10: 035873-0005-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Ana lyt ieal Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units Limit Hethod Date Date

Aluminum 5180 mg/kg 12.9 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Antimony 21.4 mg/kg 6.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Arsenic 9.3 mg/kg 0.65 7060 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94

Barium 1890 mg/kg 1.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Beryllium 0.71 mg/kg 0.26 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cadmium 11.2 mgjkg 0.65 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Calcium 17000 mg/kg 64.6 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Chromium 386 mg/kg 1.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cobalt 24.8 mgjkg 1.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Copper 1300 mgjkg 1.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Iron 43300 mg/kg 12.9 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Lead 1090 mgjkg 6.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Magnesium 5700 mgjkg 64~6 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Manganese 409 mg/kg 1.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Mercury 3.8 mg/kg 0.13 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Nickel 903 mgjkg 5.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Potassium NO mg/kg 646 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Selenium 1.7 mg/kg 1.3 7740 17 AUG 94 24 AUG 94

Sil ver 1.5 mg/kg 1.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Sodium NO mg/kg 646 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Thall iurn NO mg/kg 0.65 7841 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Vanadium 147 mg/kg 1.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Zinc 2600 mg/kg 2.6 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 23%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

AH. b) r- 6u

TIERRA-A-017656
Ensc"(\J

Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA6

Lab 10: 035873-0007-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 5280 mg/kg 22.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Antimony 74.7 mg/kg 11.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Arsenic 10.8 mg/kg 2.2 7060 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94

Barium 1740 mgjkg 2.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Beryllium 0.49 mg/kg 0.45 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cadmium 29.8 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Calcium 24800 mg/kg Il2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Chromium 179 mg/kg 2.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cobalt 22.5 mg/kg 2.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Copper 1480 mg/kg 2.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Iron 77100 mg/kg 22.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Lead 1850 mgjkg 11.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Magnesium 3190 mgjkg Il2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Manganese 2050 mg/kg 2.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Mercury 3.2 mg/kg 0.22 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Nickel 216 mg/kg 8.9 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Potassium NO mg/kg Il20 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Selenium· 3.9 mgjkg 1.1 7740 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94 ~

Silver 16.1 mgjkg 2.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Sodium 1160 mgjlcg 1120 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Thallium NO mgjkg 1.1 7841 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Vanadium 133 mgjkg 2.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Zinc 4560 mgjkg 4.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Percent moisture 1s 551. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

S • Reported value determined by method of standard addition.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

TIERRA-A-017657
EnseCl)

Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA7

Lab 10: 035873-0008-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

.... DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 16000 mg/kg 13.9 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Antimony 41.3 mg/kg 6.9 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Arsenic 8.5 mgjkg 3.5 7060 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94

Barium 2700 mg/kg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Beryllium 0.52 mgjkg 0.28 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cadmium 68.1 mgjkg 0.69 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Calcium 50200 mg/kg 69.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Chromium 406 mgjkg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cobalt 22.9 mg/kg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Copper 25000 mgjkg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Iron 60200 mgjkg 13.9 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Lead 13000 mg/kg 6.9 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Magnesium 3980 mgjkg 69.5 60-10 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Manganese 1130 mg/k9 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Mercury 3.6 mg/kg 0.14 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Niekel 285 mg/kg 5.6 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Potassium 1130 mg/kg 695 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Selenium 4.9 mg/kg 0.69 7740 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94 .

5ilver 66.0 mg/kg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Sodium 1710 mg/kg 695 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Thall ium NO mg/kg 0.69 7841 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Vanadium 115 mg/kg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Zinc 8110 mg/kg 2.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 28%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

S • Reported value determined by method of standard addition.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

At~.D) f' 62.

TIERRA-A-017658
Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA8

Lab 10: 035B73-0009-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 9220 mg/kg 25.2 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Antimony 57.1 mg/kg 12.6 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Arsenic 5.6 mg/lcg 3.2 7060 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94

Barium 2740 mg/kg 2.5 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Beryllium NO' mg/kg 0.50 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Cadmium 85.2 mg/kg 1.3 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Calcium 100000 mg/kg 126 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Chromium 437 mg/kg 2.5 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Cobalt 19.9 mg/kg 2.5 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Copper 55400 mg/kg 2.5 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Iron 35100 mg/kg 25.2 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Lead 7070 mgjkg 12.6 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Magnesium 5440 mgjkg 126 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Manganese 1230 mgjkg 2.5 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Mercury 1.0 mgjkg 0.13 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

. - Nickel 349 mg/kg 10.1 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Potassium NO mg/kg 1260 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Selenium 2.2 mg/kg 0.63 7740 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94

Sil ver 35.4 mg/kg 2.5 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Sodium 1370 mg/kg 1260 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Thall ium NO mg/kg 0.63 7841 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Vanadium 64.3 mg/kg 2.5 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Zinc 7430 mgjkg 5.0 6010 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 21%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

S • Reported value determined by method of standard addition.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

TIERRA-A-017659
Ensec()

Tota·l Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA9

Lab ID: 035873-0010-SA Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 13900 mg/kg 66.4 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Antimony 42.2 mg/kg 33.2 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Arsenic 16.6 mg/kg 1.3 7060 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Barium 23200 mg/kg 6.6 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Beryllium NO mg/kg 1.3 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Cadmium 93.7 mg/kg 3.3 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Calcium 32200 rng/kg 332 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Chromium 295 mgjkg 6.6 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Cobalt 33.6 mgjkg 6.6 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Copper 9000 mgjkg 6.6 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Iron 48600 mg/kg 66.4 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

;.;...~~ Lead 7240 mg/kg 33.2 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94 '.;l!.i ..•.

r,_'

~ Magnesium 4250 mgjkg 332' 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94 ,'"" Manganese 1800 mg/kg 6.6 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUe 94 p'."

~~ Mercury 3.7 mg/kg 0.13 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Nickel 233 mgjkg 26.S 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Potassium NO mgjkg 3320 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Selenium 4.S mg/kg 3.3 7740 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Silver 187 mgjkg 6.6 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Sodium NO mg/kg 3320 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Thallium NO mgjkg 0.66 7841 17 AUG 94 18 AUG 94

Vanadium 155 mg/kg 6.6 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Zinc 10100 mgjkg 13.3 6010 17 AUG 94 23 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

S • Reported value determined by method of standard addition.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

TIERRA-A-017660
Ense-cc'l

General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK~S-HAI

Lab ID: 035873-0001-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Parameter

Cyanide. Total

Result

0.78

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Units Limit Method

mg/kg 0.57 9010

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

25 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017661
General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-FD-HAl

Lab 10: 035873-0002-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Cyanide. Total 3.5 mg/kg 0.58 9010 25 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Percent moisture 1s 14%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017662
Enseco

General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA2

Lab ID: 035873-0003-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: II AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units limit Method

Cyanide, Total 2.2 mg/kg 0.56 9010

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

25 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

..,'

,-

Percent moisture is 11%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017663
General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

C1 ient ID: 2BK-5-HA3

Lab 10: 035873-0004-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

Cyanide, Total

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

NO mg/kg 0.62 9010 2S AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 20%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

AH. D} r· b~

TIERRA-A-017664
General' Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA4

Lab 10: 035873-000S-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Cyanide, Total 2.3 mg/kg 0.65 9010 25 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 23%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

Au. D, f 1/1

TIERRA-A-017665
Enseco

General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HAS

Lab 10: 035873-0006-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Parameter

Cyanide. Total

Result

1.2

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Units Limit Method

mg/kg 0.67 9010

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

25 AUG 94 2S AUG 94

Percent moisture is 26%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017666
·.... "..,."

~'

-:.,:::l

EnseCl..l

General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA6

Lab 10: 03SS73-0007-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Parameter

Cyanide. Total

Result

3.7

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Units Limit Method

mgjkg 1.1 9010

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

25 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 55%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay

..•

Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017667
General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA7

Lab 10: 035873-000B-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Cyanide, Total 7.8 mg/kg 0.69 9010 25 ~UG 94 25 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 28%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

An. 1» f' tZ

TIERRA-A-017668
General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA8

Lab 10: 035873-0009-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Cyanide, Total 6.1 mgjkg 0.63 9010 25 AUG 94 25 AUG 9l

Percent moisture is 211. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017669
General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HA9

Lab ID: 035873-0010-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 11 AUG 94

Received: 11 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

...

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Cyanide, Total 2.8 mg/kg 0.66 9010 25 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017670
September 21, 1994

Mr. John Golden

International Technology

Corporation

165 Fie1dcrest Avenue

Edison, NJ 08837

PROJECT NUMBER: 035869

P.O. NUMBER: 529740

Dear Mr. Golden:

Enclosed are the results of the analyses for Soil samples, sampled

8/12/94~ for the following sample(s):

Number of Samp1e(s)

1

4

Sample Matrix

AQUEOUS

SOIL

The sample{s) were received under chain of custody at Enseea-East Laboratory on August 12, 1994. A brief description of the Quality Assuranee/

Quality Control and method references employed by Enseco is contained within

the report. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results and

;s considered an integral part of this report.

All analyses subcontracted to Quanterra-New Jersey are found in

appendix one of this report.

All analyses subcontracted to Quanterra-Tennessee are found in

appendix two of this report.

All analyses subcontracted to Teledyne Brown Engineering are

found in appendix three of this report.

Please refer to this project by the Enseco-East Laboratory Project Number

to expedite any future discussions. We will be happy to answer any questions

or concerns that you may have.

/

f

een Nemeth

. ~ Program Manager

ENSECO-EAST LABORATORY

AHt} p.l

TIERRA-A-017671
TeL Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HAIO

Lab to: 035869-0002-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 20 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Chloromethane NO ugjkg 14

Bromomethane NO ugjkg 14

Vinyl Chloride NO ugjkg 14

Chloroethane NO ugjkg 14

Methylene chloride NO ugjkg 7.2

Acetone NO ugjkg 14

Carbon disulfide NO ugjkg 7.2

l,l-0ichloroethene NO ugjkg 7.2

l,l-0ichloroethane NO ugjkg 7.2

l,2-0ichloroethene (cisj

trans) NO ugjkg 7.2

Chloroform NO ugjkg 7.2

l,2-0ichloroethane NO ug/kg 7.2

2-Butanone NO ugjkg 14

l,l,l-Trichloroethane NO ugjkg 7.2

Carbon tetrachloride NO ugjkg 7.2

Vinyl Acetate NO ugjkg 14

Bromodichloromethane NO ugjkg 7.2

l,2-0ichloro~ropane NO ugjkg 7.2

cis-l,3-0ich oropropene NO ugjkg 7.2

Trichloroethene NO ugjkg 7.2

Oibromochloromethane NO ugjkg 7.2

1,I,2-Trichloroethane ND ugjkg 7.2

Benzene NO ugjkg 7.2

trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ND ugjkg 7.2

Bromoform ND ugjkg 7.2

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone NO ug{kg 14

2-Hexanone ND ugjkg 14

1,I,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug{kg 7.2

Tetrachloroethene NO ugjkg 7.2

Toluene NO ugjkg 7.2

Chlorobenzene NO ugjkg 7.2

Ethylbenzene NO ugjkg 7.2

Styrene NO ugjkg 7.2

Percent moisture is 31%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA • Not Applicable

ND = Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

AI+· E" f. Z

TIERRA-A-017672
TCl Volatile Organics

Client Name:

Cl ient 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8240

(cont. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HAIO

035869-0002-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 20 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Xylenes (total) ND ug/kg 7.2

Acrolein ND ug/kg 72

Acrylonitrile NO ug/kg 72

Surrogate Recovery

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 98 %

Toluene-d8 117 %

4-Bromofluorobenzene 82 %

Percent moisture is 31%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA • Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017673
TCl Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HAll

lab 10: 035869-0003-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 20 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

Chloromethane NO ug/kg 13

Bromomethane NO ug/kg 13

Vinyl Chloride NO ug/kg 13

Chloroethane NO ug/kg 13

Methylene chloride NO ug/kg 6.4

Acetone NO ug/kg 13

Carbon disulfide NO ug/kg 6.4

l,l-Oichloroethene NO ug/kg 6.4

l,l-Oichloroethane NO ug/kg 6.4

l,2-0ichloroethene (cisj

trans) NO ug/kg 6.4

Chloroform NO ug/kg 6.4

l,2-0ichloroethane NO ug/kg 6.4

2-Butanone NO ug/kg 13

l,l,l-Trichloroethane NO ugjkg 6.4

Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/kg 6.4

Vinyl Acetate NO ug/kg 13

Bromodichloromethane NO ug/kg 6.4

l,2-0ichloropropane NO ug/kg 6.4

cis-l,3-0ichloropropene NO ugjkg 6.4

Trichloroethene NO ug/kg 6.4

Oibromochloromethane NO ug/kg 6.4

l,l,2-Trichloroethane NO ugjkg 6.4

Benzene NO ugjkg 6.4

trans-l,3-0ichloropropene NO ug/kg 6.4

Bromoform NO ug/kg 6.4

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone NO ug/kg 13

2-Hexanone NO ug/kg 13

I,I,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO ug/kg 6.4

Tetrachloroethene NO ug/kg 6.4

Toluene NO ugjkg 6.4

Chlorobenzene NO ug/kg 6.4

Ethylbenzene NO ug/kg 6.4

Styrene NO ug/kg 6.4

Percent moisture is 22%. All resul ts and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA = Not Applicable

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

AH-· f, p. L.f

TIERRA-A-017674
TCl Volatile Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8240

(cant.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HAll

035869-0003-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 20 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

Xylenes (total) NO ug/kg 6.4

Acrolein NO ug/kg 64

Acrylonitrile NO ug/kg 64

Surrogate Recovery

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 98 %

Toluene-d8 113 %

4-Bromofluorobenzene 88 %

Percent moisture is 22%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA = Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017675
TCl Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HAI2

Lab 10: 035869-0004-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 20 AUG 94

'" DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units Limit Parameter

Chloromethane NO ug/kg 11 Bromomethane NO ug/kg 11 Vinyl Chloride NO ug/kg 11 Chloroethane NO ug/kg 11 Methylene chloride NO ug/k9 5.7 Acetone NO ug/k9 11 Carbon disulfide NO ug/kg 5.7 l,l-Oichloroethene NO ug/kg 5.7 l,l-Oichloroethane NO ug/kg 5.7 1,2-0ichloroethene (cis/

trans) NO U9/k9 5.7 Chloroform NO ug/kg 5.7 l,2-0ichloroethane NO ugjkg 5.7 2-Butanone NO ug/k9 11 l,l,l-Trichloroethane NO ug/kg 5.7 Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/kg 5.7 Vinyl Acetate NO ug/kg 11 Bromodichloromethane NO ug/kg 5.7 1,2-0ichloropropane NO ug/kg 5.7 cis-I,3-0ichloropropene

Trichloroethene NO ug/kg 5.7

NO ug/kg 5.7 Oibromochloromethane NO ug/kg 5.7 1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Benzene NO U9/k9 5.7

NO u9/1<9 5.7 trans-l,3-0ichloropropene

Bromoform NO U9/k9 5.7

NO ug/k9 5.7 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone

2-HexanQne NO U9/k9 11

NO U9/1<9 11 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene NO U9/k9 5.7

Toluene NO u9/1<9 5.7

Chlorobenzene NO ug/kg 5.7

Ethylbenzene NO ug/kg 5.7

Styrene NO U9/k9 5.7

NO ug/k9 5.7

Percent moisture is 13%. A 11 results and 1imits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA = Not Applicable

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017676
TCl Volatile Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

International

2BK-S-HA12

035869-0004-SA

SOIL

Method 8240

(cont. )

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 20 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Xylenes (total) NO ug/kg 5.7

Acrolein NO ug/kg 57

Acrylonitrile NO ug/kg 57

Surrogate Recovery

1,2-0ichloroethane-d4 105 %

Toluene-d8 137 % v

4-Bromofluorobenzene 66 % v

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

v • Surrogate recovery outside of QC limits due to sample matrix interference as

verified by reanalysis.

NA = Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017677
Tel Volatile Organics -\ \...~rr,ln'l.: ....,·m['..1!'1\

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HA13

lab ID: 035869-0005-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 20 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Chloromethane NO ug/kg 13

Bromomethane NO ug/kg 13

Vinyl Chloride NO ug/kg 13

Chloroethane NO ug/kg 13

Methylene chloride NO ug/kg 6.7

Acetone NO ug/kg 13

Carbon disulfide NO ug/kg 6.7

1,1-0ichloroethene NO ug/kg 6.7

1,1-0ichloroethane NO ug/k.g 6.7

1,2-0ichloroethene (cis!

trans) NO ug/k.g 6.7

Chloroform NO ug/kg 6.7

l,2-0ichloroethane NO ug/kg 6.7

2-Butanone NO ug/kg 13

1,1,I-Trichloroethane NO ug/kg 6.7

Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/k.g 6.7

Vinyl Acetate NO ugjkg 13

Bromodichloromethane NO ugjkg 6.7

l,2-0ichloropropane NO ugjkg 6.7

cis-1,3-0ichloropropene NO ug/k.g 6.7

Trichloroethene 7.7 ug/kg 6.7

Oibromochloromethane NO ug/kg 6.7

1,l,2-Trichloroethane NO ug/kg 6.7

Benzene NO ug/kg 6.7

trans-1,3-0ichloropropene NO ug/kg 6.7

Bromoform NO ugjkg 6.7

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone NO ug/kg 13

2-Hexanone NO ug/kg 13

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO ugjk.g 6.7

Tetrachloroethene NO ugjkg 6.7

Toluene NO ug/kg 6.7

Chlorobenzene NO ug/kg 6.7

Ethyl benzene NO ug/kg 6.7

Styrene NO ug/kg 6.7

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NA = Not Applicable

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017678
TCl Volatile Organics

Client Name:

Client ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

Internat iona 1

2BK-5-HA13

035869-0005-SA

SOIL

Method 8240

(cant. )

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 20 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units L1mit

Xylenes (total) NO ug/kg 6.7

Acrolein NO ug/kg 67

Acrylonitrile' NO ug/kg 67

Surrogate Recovery

1.2-0ichloroethane-d4 97 %

Toluene-d8 124 % II

4-Bromofluorobenzene 80 %

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

v z Surrogate recovery outside of QC limits due to sample matrix interference as

verified by reanalysis.

NA E Not Applicable

ND • Not Detected

Reported By: Salman Qazi Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017679
Tel Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HAI0

Lab 10: 03S869-0002-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Parameter

Phenol

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether

2-Ch 1oropheno 1

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

2-Methylphenol

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)

ether

4-Methylphenol

N-Nitroso-di-npropyl amine

Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene

Isophorone

2-Nitrophenol

2,4-Dimethylphenol

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane

2,4-Dichlorophenol

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

Naphthalene

4-Chloroaniline

Hexachlorobutadiene

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

2-Methylnaphthalene

Hexachl orocycl 0-

pentadiene

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol

2-Chloronaphthalene

2-Nitroani 1 ine

Dimethyl phthalate

Acenaphthylene

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units limit

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ug/kg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ug/kg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ugjkg

ug/kg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ug/kg

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

4800

23000

4800

23000

4800

4800

d

Percent moisture is 31%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

d : All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences.

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun Approved By: Allan Mitch

TIERRA-A-017680
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

lab ID:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HAI0

035869-0002-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

3-Nitroanil ine NO ug/kg 23000

Acenaphthene NO ug/kg 4800

2.4-0initrophenol NO ug/kg 23000

4-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 23000

Dibenzofuran NO ug/kg 4800

2.4-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 4800

2.6-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 4800

Diethyl phthalate NO ug/kg 4800

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether NO ug/kg 4800

Fluorene NO ug/kg 4800

4-Nitroanil ine NO ug/kg 23000

4,6-0initro-2-

methyl phenol NO ug/kg 23000

N-Nitrosodiphenhlamine NO ug/kg 4800

4-Bromophenyl p enyl

ether NO ug/kg 4800

Hexachlorobenzene 140000 ug/kg 24000 0

Pentachlorophenol NO ug/kg 23000

Phenanthrene NO ug/kg 4800

Anthracene NO ug/kg 4800

9H-Carbazole NO ug/kg 4800

Oi-n-butyl phthalate NO ug/kg 4800

Fluoranthene NO ug/kg 4800

Pyrene NO ugjkg 4800

Butyl benzyl phthalate NO ugjkg 4800

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine NO ugjkg 9500

Benzo(aJanthracene NO ugjkg 4800

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate NO ug/kg 4800

Chrysene NO ugjkg 4800

Oi-n-octyl phthalate NO ug/kg 4800

Benzo(b)fluoranthene NO ugjkg 4800

Percent moisture is 31%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

o = Compound quantitated using a secondary dilution.

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Oikun Approved By: Allan Mitch

TIERRA-A-017681
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client ID:

lab ID:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA10

035869-0002-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

...

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Benzo(k)fluoranthene NO ugjkg 4800

Benzo(a)pyrene NO ugjkg 4800

Indeno(I,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ugjkg 4800

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene NO ug/kg 4800

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NO ug/kg 4800

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-dS 65 %

2-Fluorobiphenyl 92 %

Terphenyl-dl4 105 %

Phenol-dS 76 %

2-Fluorophenol 84 % .

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 74 %

Percent moisture is 31%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO : Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Dikun Approved By: Allan Mitch

TIERRA-A-017682
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HAll

Lab 10: 035869-0003-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

Phenol NO ug/kg 420

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether NO ug/kg 420

2-Chlorofhenol NO ug/kg 420

1,3-0ich orobenzene NO ug/kg 420

1,4-0ichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 420

1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 420

2-MethYl~henOl NO ug/kg 420

bis(2-Ch oroisopropyl)

ether NO ug/kg 420

4-Methylphenol NO ug/kg 420

N-Nitroso-di-npropyl amine . NO ug/kg 420

Hexachloroethane NO ugikg 420

Nitrobenzene NO ug/kg 420

lsophorone NO ug/kg 420

2-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 420

2,4-0imethylphenol NO ug/kg 420

..;;' bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane NO ug/kg 420

2,4-Dichlorophenol NO ug/kg 420

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 420

Naphthalene NO ug/kg 420

4-Chloroanil ine NO ug/kg 420

Hexachlorobutadiene NO ug/kg 420

4-Chl oro-3-methyl phenol NO ug/kg 420

2-Methylnaphthalene NO ug/kg 420

Hexach19rocyclopentadiene NO ug/kg 420

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NO ug/kg 420

2,4,S-Trichlorophenol NO ug/kg 2000

2-Chlorona~hthalene NO ug/kg 420

2-Nitroani ine NO ug/kg 2000

Dimethyl phthalate NO ug/kg 420

Acenaphthylene NO ug/kg 420

3-Nitroaniline NO ug/kg 2000

Percent moisture is 22%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Dikun Approved By: Allan Mitch

TIERRA-A-017683
TeL Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HAll

035869-0003-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

Acenaphthene NO ugjkg 420

2,4-Dinitrophenol NO ugjkg 2000

4-Nitrophenol NO ugjkg 2000

Oibenzofuran NO ugjkg 420

2,4-0initrotoluene NO ugjkg 420

2,6-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 420

Oiethyl phthalate NO ug/kg 420

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether NO ug/kg 420

Fluorene NO ug/kg 420

4-Nitroaniline NO ug/kg 2000

4,6-0initro-2-

methyl phenol NO uglkg 2000

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NO ug/kg 420

4-Bromophenyl phenyl

ether NO ug/kg 420

Hexachlorobenzene 640 ug/kg 420

Pentachlorophenol NO ug/kg 2000

Phenanthrene NO ug/kg 420

Anthracene NO ug/kg 420

9H-Carbazole NO ugjkg 420

Oi-n-butyl phthalate NO ug/kg 420

F1uoranthene NO ug/kg 420

pyrene NO ug/kg 420

Butyl benzyl phthalate NO ug/kg 420

3,3'-Oichlorobenzidine NO ugjkg 840

Benzo(a)anthracene NO ug/kg 420

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate NO ugjkg 420

Chrysene NO ug/kg 420

Oi-n-octyl phthalate NO ug/kg 420

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 430 ug/kg 420

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ug/kg 420

Benzo(a)pyrene NO ug/kg 420

Indeno(I,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ug/kg 420

Percent moisture is 22%. All results and 1imi ts are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO "'Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dikun Approved By: Allan Mitch

Au. E) f. (Lj

TIERRA-A-017684
Client Name:

Client to:

Lab to:

Matrix:

International

2BK-S-HAl1

035869-0003-SA

SOIL

TCl Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

(cont. )

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND ug/kg 420

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ug/kg 420

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-dS 69 %

2-Fluorobiphenyl 94 %

Terphenyl-dl4 113 %

Phenol-d5 82 %

2-Fluorophenol 81 %

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 126 % I

Percent moisture is 22%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

I • Surrogate recovery outside of limits due to sample matrix interference.

ND • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dikun Approved By: Allan Mitch

All. E ) polS

TIERRA-A-017685
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

Enst\.J'

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA12

lab 10: 035869-0004-SA

Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit

Phenol

bis(2-Chloroethyl) NO ug/kg 15000 d ether NO ug/kg 15000 2-Chlorophenol NO ug{kg 15000 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO ugjkg 15000 l,4-0ichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 15000 l,2-Dichlorobenzene NO ug{kg 15000 2-MethYl~henol NO ug{kg 15000 bis(2-Ch oroisopropyl)

ether NO ug/kg 15000 4-Methylphenol NO ug{kg 15000 N-Nitroso-di -npropyl amine NO ug/kg 15000 Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene NO ug/kg 15000

Isophorone NO ugjkg 15000

2-Nitropheno 1 NO ug{kg 1S000

NO ug/kg IS000 2,4-0imethylphenol NO ug{kg 15000 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane

2,4-Dichlorophenol NO ug{kg 15000

NO ug/kg 15000 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

Naphthalene NO ug/kg 15000

4-Chloroaniline NO ug/kg 15000

Hexachlorobutadiene NO ugjkg 15000

NO ugjkg 15000 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NO ug{kg 15000 2-Methylnaphthalene

Hexachlorocyclo- NO ug{kg 15000

pentadiene NO ugjkg 15000 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NO ugjkg 15000 2.4,5-TriChloro~henol NO ug{kg 74000 2-Chlorona~htha ene

2-Nitroani ine NO ug{kg 15000

Dimethyl phthalate NO ug/kg 74000

Acenaphthylene NO ug/kg 15000

NO ug{kg 15000

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

d = All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences. NO = Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Dikun Approved By: All an Mitch

Aff. E) f.16

TIERRA-A-017686
EnseC(!

TCl Semi volatile Organics

.l" ,--,'fT",!r"': .. \'r-';'.H'.

Method 8270

(cont. )

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA12

lab 10: 035869-0004-SA Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 12 AUG 94 Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

ORY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter

Result Units Limit

3-Nitroaniline

NO ug/kg 74000

Acenaphthene

NO ug/kg 15000

2t4-0initrophenol

NO ug/kg 74000

4-Nitrophenol

NO ug/kg 74000

Oibenzofuran

NO ug/kg 15000

2t4-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 15000

2,6-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 15000

Oiethyl phthalate NO ug/kg 15000

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether

NO ug/kg 15000

Fluorene

NO ug/kg 15000

4-Nitroaniline

NO ug{kg 74000

4,6-Dinitro-2-

methyl phenol

NO ug/kg 74000

.. ~~. N-NitrosodiPhenhlamine NO ug/kg 15000

4-Bromophenyl P enyl

ether

NO ug/kg 15000

Hexachlorobenzene

NO ug/kg 15000

Pentachlorophenol

NO ug/kg 74000

Phenanthrene

NO ug/kg 15000

Anthracene

NO ug/kg 15000

9H-Carbazole

NO ug/kg 15000

Di-n-butyl phthalate NO ug/kg 15000

F1uoranthene NO ug/kg 15000

Pyrene

NO ug/kg 15000

Butyl benzyl phthalate NO ug/kg 15000

3,3'-Oichlorobenzidine NO ug/kg 30000

Benzo(a)anthracene NO ug/kg 15000

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate

NO ug/kg 15000

Chrysene

NO ug/kg 15000

Oi-n-octyl phthalate NO ug/kg 15000

Benzo{b)fluoranthene NO ug/kg 15000

Benzo(k)fluoranthene NO ug/kg 15000

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO ~ Not Detected

Reported By: leonard OiKun

Approved By: Allan Mitch

Au. £, f' r+.

TIERRA-A-017687
Client Name:

Client ID:

lab ID:

Matrix:

Internat iona 1

2BK-S-HA12

035869-0004-SA

SOIL

Tel Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

(cant. )

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Benzo(a)pyrene NO ug/kg 15000

Indeno(I,2,3-cd)pyrene NO ug/kg 15000

Oibenz(a,h)anthracene NO ug/kg 15000

Benzo(9,h,i)perylene NO ug/kg 15000

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-dS 34 %

2-Fluorobiphenyl 72 %

Terphenyl-dl4 III %

Phenol-dS 50 %

2-Fluorophenol 57 %

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 14 % I

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

I = Surrogate recovery outside of limits due to sample matrix interference.

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun Approved By: Allan Mitch

AfL E l p./~

TIERRA-A-017688
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA13

Lab 10: 035869-000S-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Result Units limit

Phenol

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether

2-Chlorophenol

1,3-0ichlorobenzene

1,4-0ichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

2-Methylphenol

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)

ether

4-Methylphenol

N-Nitroso-di-npropyl ami ne·

Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene

Isophorone

2-Nitrophenol

2,4-0imethyl phenol

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane

2,4-Dichlorophenol

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

Naphthalene

4-Ch 1oroan i1ine

Hexachlorobutadiene

4-Chl oro-3-methyl phenol

2-Methylnaphthalene

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol

2-Chloronaphthalene

2-Nitroani1 ine

Dimethyl phthalate

Acenaphthylene

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

uglkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

2200

11000

2200

11000

2200

2200

d

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

d • All reporting limits raised due to matrix interferences.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun Approved By: Allan Mitch

AH.E, r.l~

TIERRA-A-017689
Ensecc)

Tel Semivolatile Organics

4. (.l,mln.:- 1..-\'r""":"J~'''.

Method 8270

(cont.)

Client Name: Internat iona 1 Technology Corporation

Cl ient ID: 2BK-S-HAI3

lab to: 035869-000S-SA Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 12 AUG 94 Pre~ared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Ana yzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

3-Nitroaniline NO ug/kg 11000

Acenaphthene NO ug/kg 2200

2,4-0initrophenol NO ugjkg 11000

4-Nitrophenol NO ug/kg 11000

Oibenzofuran NO ug/kg 2200

2,4-0initrotoluene NO ugjkg 2200

2,6-0initrotoluene NO ug/kg 2200

Oiethyl phthalate NO ugjkg 2200

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether NO ugjkg 2200

Fluorene NO ugjkg 2200

4-Nitroanil ine NO. ugJkg 11000

4,6-0initro-2-

methyl phenol NO ugjkg 11000

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NO ug/kg 2200

4-Bromophenyl phenyl

ether NO ug/kg 2200

Hexachlorobenzene NO ug/kg 2200

Pentachlorophenol NO ug/kg 11000

Phenanthrene NO ug/kg 2200

Anthracene NO ug/kg 2200

9H-Carbazole NO ug/kg 2200

Oi-n-butyl phthalate NO ug/kg 2200

Fluoranthene NO ug/kg 2200

Pyrene NO ug/kg 2200

Butyl benzyl phthalate NO ug/kg 2200

"- 3,3'-Oichlorobenzidine NO ugjkg 4400

Benzo{a)anthracene NO ugjkg 2200

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate NO ugjkg 2200

Chrysene NO ug/kg 2200

Oi-n-octyl phthalate NO ugjkg 2200

Benzo(b)fluoranthene NO ugjkg 2200

Benzo{k)fluoranthene NO ug/kg 2200

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Dikun Approved By: Allan Mitch

.tiff. t, p'2o

TIERRA-A-017690
Tel Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

el ient 10:

lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-S-HA13

03S869-000S-SA

SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Benzo(a)pyrene NO ug/kg 2200

Indeno(1~2,3-cd)pyrene NO ug/kg 2200

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene NO ug/kg 2200

Benzo(9,h,i)perylene NO ug/kg 2200

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-dS 80 %

2-Fluorobiphenyl 101 %

Terphenyl-d14 III %

Phenol-dS 85 %

2-Fluorophenol 77 %

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 81 %

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun Approved By: Allan Mitch

TIERRA-A-017691
Ensecll

TCl Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs ... '~ 'r:!!n.,:- '- " ......-r'.'

Method B080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HA10

lab ID: 035869-0002-SA Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 12 AUG 94 Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

alpha-SHC NO ug/kg 2300 u

beta-SHC NO ug/kg 2300

delta-SHe NO ug/kg 2300

gamma-SHC (lindane) NO ug/kg 2300

Heptachlor NO ug/kg 2300

Aldrin NO ug/kg 2300

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 2300

Endosulfan I NO ug/kg 2300

Dieldrin NO ug/kg 4600

4,4'-00E 27000 ug/kg 4600

Endrin NO ug/kg 4600

Endosulfan II NO ug/kg 4600

4,4'-000 NO ug/kg 4600

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 4600

4,4'-00T 50000 ug/kg 4600

Endrin ketone NO ug/kg 4600

Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 23000

Chlordane NO ug/kg 23000

Toxaphene NO ug/kg 46000

Aroclor 1016 NO ug/kg 23000

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/kg 23000

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/kg 23000

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/kg 23000

Aroclor 1248 ND ug/kg 23000

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg 46000

Aroclor 1260 NO ug/kg 46000

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCX{ NO % H

Decach orobiphenyl NO % H

Percent moisture is 31%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

H = Surrogate not detected because of required sample dilution.

u = All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO z Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Damarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017692
Tel Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HAII

Lab 10: 035869-0003-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

alpha-SHe NO ugjkg 10

beta-SHC NO ugjkg 10

delta-SHC NO ugjkg 10

gamma-SHC (Lindane) NO ug/kg 10

Heptachlor NO ugjkg 10

Aldrin NO ugjkg 10

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 10

Endosulfan I 31 ug/kg 10

Dieldrin NO ug/kg 20

4,4'-ODE 210 ug/kg 20

Endrin NO ugjkg 20

Endosul fan II NO ugjkg 20

4,4'-000 20 ug1kg 20

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 20

4,4'-00T 140 ug/kg 20

Endrin ketone NO ug/kg 20

,- Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 100

Chlordane NO ugjkg 100

Toxaphene NO ug/kg 200

Aroclor 1016 NO ugjkg 100

Aroclor 1221 NO ugjkg 100

Aroclor 1232 NO ugjkg 100

Aroclor 1242 NO ugjkg 100

Aroclor 1248 NO ugjkg 100

Aroclor 1254 NO ugjkg 200

Aroclor 1260 NO ug/kg 200

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

{TCX~ 80.1 %

Decach orobiphenyl 192 % &

Percent moisture ;s 22%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

& • Surrogate recovery is outside of control limits.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017693
Enst\)

TCl Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs ~ ... ,'''''':''';r,;: '-- ,'~

Method 8080

Client Name: Internat iona 1 Technology Corporation

Cl ient ID: 2SK-S-HAI2

lab 10: 035869-0004-SA Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 12 AUG 94 Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

...

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit

alpha-SHC NO ug/kg 37 u

beta-BHC NO ug/kg 37 delta-SHC NO ug/kg 37 gamma-BHC (lindane) NO ug/kg 37 Heptachlor NO ug/kg 37 Aldrin NO ug/kg 37 Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 37 Endosulfan I NO ug/kg 37 Dieldrin ND ug/kg . 74 4,4'-00E NO ug/kg 74 Endrin NO ug/kg 74 Endosulfan II NO ug/kg 74 4,4'-000 NO ug1kg 74 Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 74 4,4'-DDT 230 ug/kg 74 Endri n ketone NO ug/kg 74 Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 370 Chlordane NO ug/kg 370 Toxaphene NO ug/kg 740 Aroclor 1016 NO ug/kg 370 Aroclor 1221 NO ug/kg 370 Aroclor 1232 NO ug/kg 370 Aroclor 1242 NO ug/kg 370 Aroclor 1248 NO ug/kg 370 Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg 740 Aroclor 1260 NO ug/kg 740

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCXi 31.6 % Oecach orobiphenyl NO % H

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

H = Surrogate not detected because of required sample dilution.

u = All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu Approved Sy: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017694
Enst\.:\ "'

TCl Organochlorine PesticidesjPCBs ~ ....t'~l~..: 1,.,'''''''''11:'',

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HAI3

Lab 10: 035869-0005-SA Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 12 AUG 94 Prepared: 16 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94 Analyzed: 25 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

alpha-BHC NO ugjkg 43 u

beta-BHe NO ugjkg 43

delta-BHC NO ugjkg 43

gamma-BHe (Lindane) NO ugjkg 43

Heptachlor NO ugjkg 43

Aldrin NO ugjkg 43

Heptachlor epoxide NO ugjkg 43

Endosulfan I NO ugjkg 43

Dieldrin NO ugjkg 85

4,4'-00E NO ugjkg 85

Endrin NO ugjkg 85

Endosulfan II- NO ug/kg 85

4,4'-000 NO ug7kg 85

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 85

4,4'-00T 100 ug/kg 85

Endrin ketone NO ug/kg 85

Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 430

.;. Chlordane NO ug/kg 430

Toxa~hene NO ug/kg 850

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/kg 430

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/kg 430

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/kg 430

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/kg 430

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/kg 430

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg 850

Aroclor 1260 7400 ug/kg 2100 0

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCX~ 28.9 %

Oecach orobiphenyl NO % H

Percent moisture is 25". All results and 1imits are reported on a dry weight basis.

o • Compound quantitated using a secondary dilution.

H • Surrogate not detected because of required sample dilution.

u • All reporting limits raised due to high levels of target analytes.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017695
Total Petroleum. Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA10

lab 10: 035869-0002-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons 1500 mg/kg 120 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 31%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017696
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-$-HAll

Lab ID: 035869-0003-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons 42 mg/kg 26 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 22%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017697
Enseco

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client tD: 2BK-S-HAI2

Lab to: 035869-0004-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons 24000 mg/kg 1800 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017698
EnseG')

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA13

Lab 10: 03SS69-000S-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94

Parameter

Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

HOO mg/kg 53 3550/418.1 Mod. 16 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Kalpana Patel Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017699
Enseco

Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Cl ient 10: 2BK-S-HA10

lab ID: 035869-0002-SA Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

....

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 9600 mgjkg 14.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Antimony 34.4 mgjkg 7.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Arsenic 7.0 mgjkg 1.4 7060 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Barium 3300 mgjkg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Beryllium 0.56 mgjkg 0.29 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cadmium 42.7 mg/kg 0.72 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Calcium 70500 mgjkg 72.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Chromium 262 mgjkg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cobalt 41.1 mgjkg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Copper 2210 mgjkg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Iron 57800 mgjkg 14.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

lead 9400 mgjkg 7.2 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Magnesium 3770 mgjkg 72.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Manganese 721 mgjkg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Mercury 1.4 mgjkg 0.14 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Nickel 101 mgjkg 5.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Potassium 843 mgjkg 721 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

-. Selenium 1.8 mgjkg 0.72 7740 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94 S

Silver 24.7 mg/kg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Sodium NO mgjkg 721 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Thallium NO mg/kg 0.72 7841 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Vanadium 109 mg/kg 1.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Zinc 3260 mgjkg 2.9 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 31%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

S = Reported value determined by method of standard addition.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

TIERRA-A-017700
Enseco

Total Metals 4. (\'rnm~ -::,'~=,".l

I

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 28K-S-HAll

Lab 10: 035869-0003-SA Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 2620 mg/kg 128 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Antimony 1680 mg/kg 63.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Arsenic 3.2 mg/kg 0.64 7060 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Barium 1370 mg/kg 12.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Beryllium NO mg/kg 2.6 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cadmium NO mg/kg 6.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Calcium 296000 mg/kg 638 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Chromium 101 mg/kg 12.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cobalt NO mg/kg 12.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Copper 204 mg/kg 12.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Iron 8000 mg/kg 128 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Lead 4260 mg/kg 63.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Magnesium 6180 mg/kg 638 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Manganese 133 mgjkg 12.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Mercury NO mg/kg 0.13 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Nickel NO mg/kg 51.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

').~ ': Potassium NO mg/kg 6380 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 . ,~

-lo:o Selenium NO mg/kg 0.64 7740 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Silver NO mg/kg 12.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Sodium NO mg/kg 6380 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Thallium NO mg/kg 0.64 7841 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Vanadium 37.9 mg/kg 12.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Zinc 931 mg/kg 25.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 22%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

W • Post-digestion spike for furnace AA out of control limits while sample

absorbance less than 50% of spike absorbance.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

TIERRA-A-017701
Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HA12

Lab ID: 035869-0004-SA Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: IS AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 12800 mg/kg 11.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Antimony 55.9 mg/kg 5.7 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Arsenic 6.1 mg/kg 0.57 7060 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94 Barium 242 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Beryll ium 9.1 mgjkg 0.23 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Cadmium 23.5 mg/kg 0.57 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 ...

",;:,)

~.;t-~ Calcium 5390 mg/kg 57.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

~~ Chromium 450 mg/kg 1.1 . 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 CobaIt 26.8 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Copper 2410 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Iron 53800 mg/kg 11.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Lead 564 mg/kg 5.7 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Magnesium 4910 mg/kg 57.5 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Manganese 580 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Mercury 0.31 mg/kg 0.11 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94 Nicke 1 703 mg/kg 4.6 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Potassium 1130 mg/kg 575 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Selenium NO mg/kg 0.57 7740 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94 Si1ver 5.3 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Sodium NO mg/kg 575 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Thallium ND mgjkg 0.57 7841 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94 Vanadium 60.3 mg/kg 1.1 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94 Zinc 2020 mg/kg 2.3 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

TIERRA-A-017702
Ensc\~\)

Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA13

lab 10: 035869-000S-SA Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Matrix: SOIL Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

DRY WEIGHT Reporti n9 Analytical Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 16800 mgjkg 134 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Antimony 1550 mg/kg 66.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Arsenic 14.3 mg/kg 2.7 7060 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Barium 4070 mgjkg 13.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Beryllium NO mg/kg 2.7 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cadmi um 89.2 mgjkg 6.7 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Calcium 82800 mgjkg 668 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Chromium 1270 mgjkg 13.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Cobalt 31.7 mg/kg 13.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Copper 2030 mgjkg 13.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Iron 202000 mgjkg 134 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Lead 6520 mgjkg 66.8 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Magnesium 45300 mg/kg 668 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Manganese 1600 mgjkg 13.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Mercury 1.3 mgjkg 0.13 7471 17 AUG 94 17 AUG 94

Nickel 1330 mgjkg 53.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Potassium NO mgjkg 6680 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Selenium 6.7 mgjkg 0.67 7740 17 AUG 94 26 AUG 94 S

Sil ver NO mgjkg 13.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Sodium NO mgjkg 6680 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Thallium NO mgjkg 0.67 7841 17 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Vanadium 280 mgjkg 13.4 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Zinc 2730 mgjkg 26.7 6010 17 AUG 94 19 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

S ~ Reported value determined by method of standard addition.

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

TIERRA-A-017703
Genera: Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-$-HA10

Lab 10: 035869-0002-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Cyanide, Total 2.5 mg/kg 0.72 9010 25 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 31%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017704
General· Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client to: 2BK-S-HAll

Lab 10: 035869-0003-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Cyanide, Total 5.1 mg/kg 0.64 9010 25 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 22%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017705
General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-S-HA12

Lab ID: 035869-0004-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Cyanide, Total 0.72 mg/kg 0.57 9010 25 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

Percent moisture is 13%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

AH.f. p. 7h

TIERRA-A-017706
General Chemistry

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-S-HA13

Lab 10: 035869-000S-SA

Matrix: SOIL

Sampled: 12 AUG 94

Received: 12 AUG 94

Authorized: 15 AUG 94

Parameter

DRY WEIGHT Reporting Analytical

Result Units Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

Cyanide, Total 0.72 mg/kg 0.67 9010 25 AUG 94 25 AUG 94

. ~.:

Percent moisture is 25%. All results and limits are reported on a dry weight basis.

Reported By: Deborah Kay Approved By: Debra Brown

TIERRA-A-017707
Data Package

For International Technology Corporation

Enseco-East Project No. 035576

Enseco Incorporated

~200 Cottontail Lan~

Somerset, NJ 08S7~

~OI/46C)-,)800 Fax. ~Ol !.j6C)·:~1(,

Enseco Ea.st

r.. ",

Enseco

A CORNING Company

TIERRA-A-017708
Client Name:

Client 10:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

International

2BK-GW-OBI

035576-0001-SA

AQUEOUS

Parameter

Chloromethane

Bromomethane

Vinyl Chloride

Chloroethane

Methylene chloride

Acetone

Carbon disulfide

1,1-0ichloroethene

l,l-Oichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethene (cis/

trans)

Chloroform

l,2-0ichloroethane

2-Butanone

1,I,l-Trichloroethane

Carbon tetrachloride

Vinyl Acetate

Bromodichloromethane

1,2-Dichloropropane

trans-l,3-0ichloropropene

Trichloroethene

Oibromochloromethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Benzene

cis-l,3-0ichloropropene

Bromoform

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone

2-Hexanone

1,I,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

Chlorobenzene

Ethyl benzene

Styrene

NA ~ Not Applicable

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang

TCL Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUl 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Result Units

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

12 ugjl

NO ugjl

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ugjL

NO ugjL

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ugjL

ND ugjL

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 30 JUL 94

Reporting

Limit

10

10

10

10

5.0

10

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

10

5.0

5.0

10

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

10

10

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

Approved By: David Ercoliani

TIERRA-A-017709
Client Name:

Cl ient ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

Internat iona 1

2BK-GW-OBI

035576-0001-SA

AQUEOUS

TCl Volatile Organics

Method 8240

(cont. )

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Parameter Result Units

Xylenes (total) NO ug/L

Acrolein NO ug/L

Aeryl anitril e NO ug/L

Surrogate Recovery

Toluene-dB 100 %

4-Bromofluorabenzene 101 %

1.2-0ichloroethane-d4 100 %

NA = Not Applicable

NO c Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 30 JUL 94

Reporting

limit

5.0

50

50

Approved By: David Ercoliani

TIERRA-A-017710
Client Name:

Cl ient 10:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

International

2BK-GW-PBl

035576-0002-SA

AQUEOUS

...

Parameter

Chloromethane

Bromomethane

Vinyl Chloride

Chloroethane

Methylene chloride

Acetone

Carbon disulfide

1,1-Oichloroethene

1,1-0ichloroethane

1,2-0ichloroethene (cis/

trans)

Chloroform

1,2-0ichloroethane

2-Butanone

1,1,I-Trichloroethane

Carbon tetrachloride

Vinyl Acetate

Bromodichloromethane

1,2-0ichloropropane

trans-l,3-0ichloropropene

Trichloroethene

Oibromochloromethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Benzene

cis-l,3-0ichloropropene

Bromoform

4-Methyl~2-Pentanone

2-Hexanone

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

Chlorobenzene

Ethyl benzene

Styrene

NA = Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang

TCL Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Result Units

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

21 ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

31 ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

34 ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

5.1 ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 30 JUl 94

Reporting

Limit

10

10

10

10

5.0

10

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

10

5.0

5.0

10

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

10

10

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

Approved By: David Ercolian;

TIERRA-A-017711
Client Name:

Client ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

International

2BK-GW-PBl

035576-0002-SA

AQUEOUS

Tel Volatile Organics

Method 8240

(cont. )

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUl 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Parameter Result Units

Xylenes (total) NO ug/L

Acrolein NO ug/L

Acryl on itril e NO ug/L

Surrogate Recovery

Toluene-d8 100 %

4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 %

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 101 %

NA = Not Applicable

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 30 JUL 94

Reporting

Limit

5.0

50

50

Approved By: David Ercoliani

AH.f, p.5

TIERRA-A-017712
Client Name:

Client 10:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

International

2BK-TB-0726

035576-0003-TB

AQUEOUS

Parameter

Chloromethane

Bromomethane

Vinyl Chloride

Chloroethane

Methylene chloride

Acetone

Carbon disulfide

l,l-Oichloroethene

l,l-0ichloroethane

1.2-0ichloroethene (cis!

trans)

Chloroform

1,2-0ichloroethane

2-Butanone

l,l,l-Trichloroethane

Carbon tetrachloride

Vinyl Acetate

Bromodichloromethane

1.2-0ichloropropane

trans-l,3-0ichloropropene

Trichloroethene

Oibromochloromethane

1,I,2-Trichloroethane

Benzene

cis-l,3-Dichloropropene

Bromoform

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone

2-Hexanone

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

Chlorobenzene

Ethyl benzene

Styrene

NA z Not Applicable

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang

Tel Volatile Organics

Method 8240

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Result Units

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ugjL

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ugjl

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ugjL

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ugjL

NO ugjL

NO ugjL

NO ugjL

NO ug/L

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 30 JUL 94

Reporting

Limit

10

10

10

10

5.0

10

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

10

5.0

5.0

10

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

10

10

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

Approved By: David Ercoliani

TIERRA-A-017713
Tel Volatile Organics

Client Name:

C1 ient ID:

lab ID:

Matrix:

Method 8240

(cont.)

International Technology Corporatlon

2BK-TB-0726

035576-0003-T8

AQUEOUS

Parameter

Xy1enes (total)

Acrolein

Acryl oni tril e

Surrogate

Toluene-dB

4-Bromof1uorobenzene

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4

NA = Not Applicable

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Ann Liang

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUl 94

Authorized: 27 JUl 94

Result Units

NO ug/l

--ADDED--- ug/l

--AOOEO--- ug/L

Recovery

101

101

9B

%

%

%

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 30 JUL 94

Reporting

limit

5.0

Approved By: David Ercoliani

TIERRA-A-017714
Volatiles Library Search (10 Compound TID)

Method 8240

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-TB-0726

Lab ID: 035576-0003-TB

Matrix: AQUEOUS

Sampled; 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized; 27 JUL 94

Prepared: NA

Analyzed: 30 AUG 94

Parameter Result Units

Reporting

Limit

No compounds reported

NA E Not Applicable

Reported By: Ann Liang Approved By: David Ercoliani

TIERRA-A-017715
Client Name:

Client ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

International

2BK-GW-OBI

035576-0001-SA

AQUEOUS

Parameter

Phenol

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether

2-Chlorophenol

1,3-0ichlorobenzene

1,4-0ichlorobenzene

1,2-0ichlorobenzene

2-Methylphenol

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)

ether

4-Methylphenol

N-Nitroso-di-npropyl amine

Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene

Isophorone

2-Nitrophenol

2,4-Dimethylphenol

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane

2,4-Dichlorophenol

l,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

Naphthalene

4-Chloroanil ine

Hexachlorobutadiene

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

2-Methylnaphthalene

Hexachlorocycl0-

pentadiene

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol

2-Chloronaphthalene

2-Nitroanil ine

Dimethyl phthalate

Acenaphthylene

3-Nitroanil ine

ND = Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dikun

TCl Semlvolatile Organics

Method 8270

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUl 94

Result Units

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: 05 AUG 94

Reporting

limit

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

50

10

SO

10

10

50

Approved By: Debra Cutler

Au. r::, f' 't

TIERRA-A-017716
cn.:- ~ -,

L.l "'t""",,-,

TCl Semivolatile Organics ":"', '---;"' .. "'.'"'"':-'

Method 8270

(cont. )

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Cl ient 10: 2BK-GW-OBI

Lab 10: 035576-0001-SA Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Matrix: AQUEOUS Received: 27 JUl 94 prefared: 29 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94 Ana yzed: 05 AUG 94

....

Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Acenaphthene NO ug/L 10

2,4-0initrophenol NO ug/L 50

4-Nitrophenol NO ug/L 50

Oibenzofuran NO ug/L 10

2,4-0initrotoluene NO ug/L 10

2,6-0initrotoluene NO ug/L 10

Oiethyl phthalate NO ug/L 10

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether NO ug/L 10

Fluorene NO ug/L 10

4-Nitroaniline NO ug/L 50

~

4,6-0in1tro-2-

methyl phenol NO ug/L 50

~i ',.l N-Nitrosodiphenylamine NO ug/L 10

:-~~~.~~ 4-Bromophenyl phenyl

ether NO ug/l 10 ., Hexachlorobenzene NO ug/L 10

Pentachlorophenol NO ug/L 50

Phenanthrene NO ug/L 10

Anthracene NO ug/L 10

Oi-n-butyl phthalate NO ug/L 10

Fluoranthene NO ug/L 10

Pyrene NO ug/L 10

Butyl benzyl phthalate NO ug/L 10

3,3'-Oichlorobenzidine NO ug/L 20

Benzo(a)anthracene NO ug/l 10

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate NO ug/L 10

Chrysene NO ug/L 10

Oi-n-octyl phthalate NO ug/L 10

BenZO~b)flUoranthene NO ug/L 10

Benzo k)fluoranthene NO ug/L 10

Benzo(a)pyrene NO ug/L 10

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NO ug/L 10

Oibenz(a,h)anthracene NO ug/L 10

ND = Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dikun Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017717
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Cl ient 10:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

International

2BK-GW-OB1

035576-0001-SA

AQUEOUS

Method 8270

(cont. )

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 26 JUl 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Parameter Result Units

Benzo(g;h;i)perylene NO ug/L

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-d5 61 %

2-Fluorobiphenyl 69 %

Terphenyl-dl4 65 %

Phenol-d5 60 %

2-Fl uorophenol 53 %

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 67 %

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dikun

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: 05 AUG 94

Reporting

Limit

10

Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017718
·Tel Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-GW-PBl

Lab 10: 035576-0002-SA

Matrix: AQUEOUS

Parameter

Phenol

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether

2-Chlorophenol

1,3-0ichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

2-Methylphenol

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl>

ether

4-Methylphenol

N-Nitroso-di-npropyl amine

Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene

Isophorone

2-Nitrophenol

2,4-Dimethylphenol

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane

2,4-0ichlorophenol

1,2,4-Tr;chlorobenzene

Naphthalene

4-Ch 10roan il;ne

Hexachlorobutadiene

4-Chl oro-3-methyl phenol

Z-Methylnaphthalene

Hexachlorocyclopentad;ene

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

2,4,S-Trichlorophenol

2-Chloronaphthalene

2-Nitroaniline

Dimethyl phthalate

Acenaphthylene

3-Ni troanil ine

ND • Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Dikun

Sampled: 26 JUl 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Result Units

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ugjL

ND ugjl

NO ugjL

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ugjl

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ugjL

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ugjL

NO ugjl

NO ugjl

NO ugjL

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: 05 AUG 94

Reporting

Limit

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

50

10

50

10

10

50

Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017719
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cant. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-GW-PBl

035576-0002-SA

AQUEOUS

Parameter

Acenaphthene

2,4-Dinitrophenol

4-Nitrophenol

Dibenzofuran

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

2,6-Dinitrotoluene

Diethyl phthalate

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether

Fluorene

4-Nitroanil ine

4,6-Dinitro-2-

methyl phenol

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

4-Bromophenyl phenyl

ether

Hexachlorobenzene

Pentachlorophenol

Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Oi-n-butyl phthalate

Fluoranthene

Pyrene

Butyl benzyl phthalate

3,3'-Oichlorobenzidine

Benzo(a)anthracene

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate

Chrysene

Oi-n-octyl phthalate

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Indeno{I,2,3-cd)pyrene

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Aif-.F, p.13

Result Units

ND ug/l

NO ug/L

ND ug/L

ND ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

ND ug/L

ND ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: 05 AUG 94

Reporting

Limit

10

50

50

10

10

10

10

10

10

50

50

10

10

10

50

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017720
Tel Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

(cont. )

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: ZBK-GW-PBl

Lab 10: 035576-0002-SA

Matrix: AQUEOUS

Sampled: 26 JUl 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Parameter Result Units

Benzo(gthti}perylene NO ugjL

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-d5 60 %

2-Fluorobiphenyl 73 %

Terphenyl-d14 69 %

Phenol-dS 60 %

2-Fl uorophenol 49 %

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 104 %

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dikun

Prepared: 29 JUl 94

Analyzed: 05 AUG 94

Reporting

Limit

10

Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017721
TeL Semivol~tile Organics

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client ID: 2BK-GW-OBI

Lab ID: 035576-0001-SA Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Matrix: AQUEOUS Received: 27 JUL 94 Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94 Analyzed: 05 AUG 94

Reporting

Parameter Result Units limit

Phenol NO ug/l 10

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether NO ug/L 10

2-Chloro~henol NO ug/L 10

1,3-0ich orobenzene NO ug/L 10

1,4-0ichlorobenzene NO ug/L 10

1,2-0ichlorobenzene NO ug/L 10

2-MethYl~henol NO ug/L 10

,. bis(2-Ch oroisopropyl)

ether NO ug/L 10

4-Methylphenol NO ug/L 10

N-Nitroso-di-npropyl amine NO ug/L 10

Hexachloroethane NO ug/L 10

Nitrobenzene NO ug/L 10

Isophorone NO ug/L 10

2-Nitrophenol NO ug/L 10

2,4-0imethylphenol NO ug/L 10

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane NO ug/L 10

2,4-Dichlorophenol NO ug/L 10

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO ug/L 10

Naphthalene NO ug/L 10

4-Ch 1oroan iline NO ug/L 10

Hexachlorobutadiene NO ug/L 10

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NO ug/L 10

2-Methylnaphthalene NO ug/L 10

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NO ug/L 10

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NO ug/L 10

2,4,5-Trichloro~henol NO ug/L 50

2-Chlorona~htha ene NO ug/L 10

2-Nitroani ine NO ug/L 50

Dimethyl phthalate NO ug/L 10

Acenaphthylene NO ug/L 10

3-N itroan i1ine NO ug/L 50

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017722
r

.t.nst\~\"'

TeL Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client 10:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

Methoc 8270

(cont. )

International Technology Corporation

2BK-GW-OBI

035576-0001-SA

AQUEOUS

Parameter

Acenaphthene .

2,4-0initrophenol

4-Nitrophenol

Oibenzofuran

2,4-0initrotoluene

2,6-0initrotol uene

Oiethyl phthalate

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether

Fluorene

4-Nitroaniline

4,6-0initro-2-

methyl phenol

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

4-Bromophenyl phenyl

ether

Hexachlorobenzene

Pentachlorophenol

Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Oi-n-butyl phthalate

Fluoranthene

pyrene

Butyl benzyl phthalate

3,3'-Oichlorobenzidine

Benzo(a)anthracene

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)

phthalate

Chrysene

Oi-n-octyl phthalate

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Indeno(I,2,J-cd)pyrene

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Dikun

Sampled: 26 JUl 94

Received: 27 JUl 94

Authorized: 27 JUl 94

Result

ND

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

Units

ug/L

ug/l

ug/l

ug/L

ug/l

ug/L

ug/l

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/l

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/l

ug/l

ug/L

ug/L

ug/l

ug/L

ug/L

ug/l

ug/L

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: 05 AUG 94

Reporting

Limit

10

50

50

10

10

10

10

10

10

50

50

10

10

10

50

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017723
TCl Semivolatile Organics

Client Name:

Client ID:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

Method 8270

(cont.)

International Technology Corporation

2BK-GW-OBI

035576-0001-SA

AQUEOUS

Sampled: 26 JUl 94

Received: 27 JUl 94

Authorized: 27 JUl 94

Parameter Result Units

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NO ug/l

Surrogate Recovery

Nitrobenzene-dS 61

2-Fluorobiphenyl 69

"

Terphenyl-dl4 65 %"

Phenol-d5 60 %

2-Fluorophenol 53 %

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 67 "

ND = Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Oikun

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: 05 AUG 94

Reporting

Limit

10

Approved By: Debra Cutler

AH. ~, r-11

TIERRA-A-017724
En..c:;ec(l

TCL Semi volatile Organics -\ ....l'mlr.,; ""'~r'.l'"

Method 8270

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-GW-PBl

Lab 10: 035576-0002-SA Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Matrix: AQUEOUS Received: 27 JUL 94 Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94 Analyzed: 05 AUG 94

Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

Phenol NO ug/L 10

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether NO ug/l 10

2-Chlorofhenol NO ug/l 10

1,3-0ich orobenzene NO ug/L 10

1,4-oichlorobenzene NO ug/L 10

1,2-0ichlorobenzene NO ug/L 10

2-Methylfhenol NO ug/L 10

bis{2-Ch oroisopropyl)

ether NO ug/l 10

4-Methylphenol NO ug/l 10

N-Nitroso-di-npropyl amine NO ug/L 10

Hexachloroethane NO ug/L 10

Nitrobenzene NO ug/L 10 Isophorone NO ug/L 10 2-Nitrophenol NO ug/L 10 ~ .. 2.4-oimethyl phenol NO ug/L 10

.":.' bis{2-Chloroethoxy)-

methane NO ug/L 10 2,4-Dichlorophenol NO ug/L 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO ug/l 10 Naphthalene NO ug/L 10 4-Chloroaniline NO ug/L 10 Hexachlorobutadiene NO ug/L 10

4-Chloro-3-meth,lPhenol NO ug/L 10 2-MethrlnaPhtha ene NO ug/L 10 Hexach orocyclopentadiene NO ug/l 10 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NO ugjL 10 2.4,5-Trichlorophenol NO ugjL 50 2-Chlorona~hthalene NO ug/L 10 2-Nitroani ine NO ug/L 50 Dimethyl phthalate NO ug/L 10 Acenaphthylene NO ug/L 10 3-Ni troanil ine NO ug/L 50

NO c Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Dikun Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017725
Client Name:

Client ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

International

2BK-GW-PBl

035576-0002-SA

AQUEOUS

Parameter

Acenaphthene

2,4-Dinitrophenol

4-Nitrophenol

Dibenzofuran

2.4-01nitrotoluene

2,6-0initrotoluene

Oiethyl phthalate

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether

Fluorene

4-Nitroaniline

4t6-Dinitro-2-

methyl phenol

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

4-Bromophenyl phenyl

ether

Hexachlorobenzene

Pentachlorophenol

Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Oi-n-butyl phthalate

Fluoranthene

Pyrene

Butyl benzyl phthalate

3t3'-Oichlorobenzidine

Benzo(a}anthracene

bis(2-Ethylhexyl}

phthalate

Chrysene

Oi-n-octyl phthalate

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Indeno(lt2,3-cd)pyrene

Oibenz(ath)anthracene

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Leonard Oikun

TCL Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

(cont. )

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Result Units

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/L

NO ug/l

NO ug/l

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: 05 AUG 94

Reporting

limit

10

50

50

10

10

10

10

10

10

50

50

10

10

10

50

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

Approved By: Debra Cutler

TIERRA-A-017726
Client Name:

Cl ient 10:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

International

2BK-GW-PBl

035576-0002-SA

AQUEOUS

Tel Semivolatile Organics

Method 8270

(cont. )

Technology Corporation

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

NO s Not Detected

Reported By: leonard Dikun

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: as AUG 94

Reporting

Limit

10

Approved By: Debra Cutler

AH.7='\ p,20

TIERRA-A-017727
TCl Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-GW-OBI

lab 10: 035576-0001-SA

Matrix: AQUEOUS

Sampled: 26 JUl 94

Received: 27 JUl 94

Authorized: 27 JUl 94

Parameter Result Units

alpha-SHC NO ug/L

beta-8HC NO ug/l

delta-SHC NO ug/l

gamma-SHC (lindane) NO ug/l

Heptachlor NO ug/l

Aldrin NO ug/L

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/l

Endosulfan I NO ug/l

Dieldrin NO ug/L

4,4'-00E NO ug/l

Endrin NO ug/l

Endosulfan II NO ug/l

4,4'-000 NO ug/L

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/L

4,4'-00T NO ug/l

Endrin ketone NO ug/l

Methoxychlor NO ug/l

Chlordane' NO ug/l

Toxaphene NO ug/l

Aroclor 1016 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/l

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/l

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/l

Aroclor 1260 NO ug/L

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCX~ 84.6 %

Oecach orobiphenyl 76.0 %

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: 04 AUG 94

Reporting

Limit

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.50

0.50

1.0

0.50

0.50

0.5Cl

0.50

0.50

1.0

1.0

Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017728
TeL Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-GW-PB1

Lab 10: 035576-0002-SA

Matrix: AQUEOUS

...

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Parameter Result Units

alpha-BHC NO ug/L

beta-BHC NO ug/L

delta-BHe NO ug/l

gamma-SHe (Lindane) NO ug/L

Heptachlor NO ugjL

Aldrin NO ug/L

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/L

Endosulfan I NO ug/L

Dieldrin NO ugjL

4,4'-00E NO ug/L

Endrin NO ugjl

Endosulfan II NO ugjl

4,4'-000 NO ug/L

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/L ... 4,4'-00T NO ug/L

Endrin ketone NO ug/l '?":~

-, Methoxychlor NO ug/L

.....- ...£.: Chlordane NO ugjl

Toxa~hene NO ug/l

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/l

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1260 NO ug/l

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

{TCX~ 87.6 %

Decach orobiphenyl 81.0 %

NO z Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Damarapu

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: 04 AUG 94

Reporting

Limit

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.50

0.50

1.0

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

1.0

1.0

Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017729
Enseco

Tel Organochlorine Pestlcides/PCBs '" l,.1.'mln..: ,,-_om,...,..

Methoa 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

C1ient 10: 2BK-GW-OBI

Lab 10: 035576-0001-SA Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Matrix: AQUEOUS Received: 27 JUL 94 prefared: 29 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUl 94 Ana yzed: 04 AUG 94

" Reporting

Parameter Result Units Limit

alpha-BHC NO ug/l 0.050

beta-BHe NO ug/L 0.050

delta-BHC NO ug/L 0.050

gamma-BHC (lindane) NO ug/L 0.050

Heptachlor NO ug/L 0.050

Aldrin NO ug/L 0.050

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/L 0.050

Endosulfan I NO ug/l 0.050

Dieldrin NO ug/l 0.10

4,4'-OOE NO ug/l 0.10

Endrin NO ug/l 0.10

Endosu1 fan II NO ug/l 0.10

4,4'-000 NO ug/L 0.10

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/l 0.10

4,4'-00T NO ug/L 0.10

Endrin ketone NO ug/L 0.10

Methoxychlor NO ug/L 0.50

Chlordane NO ug/L 0.50

Toxaphene NO ug/L 1.0

Aroc1or 1016 NO ug/L 0.50

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/L 0.50

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/L 0.50

Aroc1or 1242 NO ug/l 0.50

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/L 0.50

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/l 1.0

Aroclor 1260 NO ug/L 1.0

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrach1oro-m-xy1ene

(TCX~ 84.6 %

Oecach orobiphenyl 76.0 %

NO ~ Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Oamarapu Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

Aft. F, f·23

TIERRA-A-017730
EnsecCl

TeL Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs

Method 8080

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-GW-PBl

Lab 10: 035576-0002-SA

Matrix: AQUEOUS

Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Parameter Result Units

alpha-8HC NO ug/L

beta-8He NO ug/L

delta-BHC NO ug/l

gamma-BHC (lindane) NO ug/L

Heptachlor NO ug/L

Aldrin NO ug/L

Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/L

Endosulfan I NO ug/L

Dieldrin NO ug/L

4,4'-ODE NO ug/l

Endrin NO ug/L

Endosulfan II NO ug/L

4,4'-000 NO ug/l

Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/L

4,4'-00T NO ug/L

~-~ Endrin ketone NO ug/L .. Methoxychlor NO ug/L ,

\..;

Chlordane NO ug/L ~,

....(.;}

Toxa,hene NO ug/L

Aroc or 1016 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1221 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1232 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1242 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1248 NO ug/L

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/l

Aroclor 1260 NO ug/L

Surrogate Recovery

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

(TCXl 87.6 %

Oecach orobiphenyl 81.0 %

NO • Not Detected

Reported By: Shanthi Damarapu

Prepared: 29 JUL 94

Analyzed: 04 AUG 94

Reporting

Limit

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.50

0.50

1.0

0.50

0.50·

0.50

0.50

0.50

1.0

1.0

Approved By: Thomas Gilbert

TIERRA-A-017731
Total r1etals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-GW-OB1

Lab ID: 035576-0001-SA

Matrix: AQUEOUS

Samplea: 26 JUl 94

Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Parameter Result Units

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Berylliurn

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

Nicke1

Potassium

Selenium

Sil ver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

8.6 mg/L

ND mg/L

0.016 mg/L

0.42 mg/L

NO mg/L

ND mg/L

219 mg/l

0.027 mg/L

ND mg/L

0.029 mg/L

33.9 mg/L

0.11 mg/L

85.6 mg/L

1.5 mg/l

0.00023 mg/L

ND mg/L

25.8 mg/L

NO mg/L

NO mg/L

290 mg/L

ND mg/L

0.13 mg/L

0.15 mg/L

Reporting Analytical

Limit Method

Prepared Analyzed

Date Date

0.10 6010

0.050 6010

0.0050 7060

0.010 6010

0.0020 6010

0.0050 6010

0.50 6010

0.010 6010

0.010 6010

0.010 6010

0.10 6010

0.025 7421

0.50 6010

0.010 6010

0.00020 7470

0.040 6010

5.0 6010

0.0050 7740

0.010 6010

5.0 6010

0.0050 7841

0.010 6010

0.020 6010

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 09 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 09 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

06 AUG 94 06 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUl 94 10 AUG 94 W

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 10 AUG 94 W

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

W = Post-digestion spike for furnace AA out of control limits while sample

absorbance less than 50% of spike absorbance.

ND = Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

TIERRA-A-017732
Total Metals

Client Name: International Technology Corporation

Client 10: 2BK-GW-PB1

Lab 10: 035576-0002-SA Sampled: 26 JUL 94

Matrix: AQUEOUS Received: 27 JUL 94

Authorized: 27 JUL 94

Reporti ng Analytical Prepared Analyzed

Parameter Result Units limit Method Date Date

Aluminum 0.12 mg/L 0.10 6010 29 JUl 94 01 AUG 94

Antimony NO mg/L 0.050 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Arsenic NO mg/L 0.0050 7060 29 JUl 94 09 AUG 94

Barium 0.028 mg/l 0.010 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Beryll ium NO mg/l 0.0020 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Cadmium NO mg/l 0.0050 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Calcium 68.2 mg/L 0.50 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Chromium NO mg/L 0.010 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Cobalt NO mg/L 0.010 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Copper NO mg/L 0.010 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Iron 46.2 mg/L 0.10 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Lead 0.024 mg/L 0.0050 7421 29 JUL 94 09 AUG 94

Magnesium 17 .2 mg/L 0.50 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Manganese 1.1 mg/L 0.010 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Mercury NO mg/L 0.00020 7470 06 AUG 94 06 AUG 94

Nickel NO mg/L 0.040 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Potassium 5.5 mg/l 5.0 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Selenium NO mg/L 0.0050 7740 29 JUL 94 10 AUG 94

Silver NO mg/L 0.010 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Sodium 57.4 mg/L 5.0 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Thallium NO mg/L 0.0050 7841 29 JUL 94 10 AUG 94

Vanadium NO mg/L 0.010 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

Zinc 0.17 mg/L 0.020 6010 29 JUL 94 01 AUG 94

NO = Not Detected

Reported By: Michael Lifton Approved By: Doug Dugan

AH. F I p.Zb

TIERRA-A-017733
REFERENCE NO. 11

TIERRA-A-017734
SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEA.1\1 PROJECT ]';OTES

TO: DATE:

Keegan Landfill file 06/09/97 (Page I of I)

K.

FROM:

Campbell @

SUWt;Cl:

Groundwater & Surface Water Use

Rt;FERt;NCt;

Kearny and its surrounding communities obtain drinking water supplies from sources which are greater than

four miles from the site. Groundwater and surface water are not known to be used for drinking water supply

within four miles of the site. The following list presents a summary of the surrounding cities and their

I respective water supply infonnation:

I

Cityrrown Drinking Water Source Comments

Kearny Wanaque Reservoir No known private drinking water wells~ mdustrial

weIls present (An A).

Harrison Passaic Valley Water Comm. No knO\\l1 private drinking water wells (Att. A: Ref

No 8. p, 52)

Newark Pequannock Watershed (W. Milford No knO\\1l private drinking water wells (An B)

Twp., Passaic County) and Wanaque Sources greater than four miles from the site.

I

i Reservoir (Ringwood. Passaic County).

I

I

Bloomfield City of Newark No known pm'ate drinking water wells (Ref.S. p.52)

i

Belleville City of Newark No known private drinking water wells (Ref.8. p.52).

East Newark Wanaque Reservoir (via Kearny) No knO\\1l private drinking water wells (Ref.S. p.52)

I

North Arlington Passaic Valley Water Comm. No knO\\1l private drinking water weIls (An. C)

Jersey City Boonton Reservoir No knO\\l1 private drinking water wells. Also

supplies water to Hoboken/LyndhurstIWest CaldwelL

._.- .._-

United Water Resources operates their system (Au. Dl.

Lyndhurst Boonton Reservoir Via Jersey City (An 0).

Secaucus United Water Resources Sources greater than four miles (Atts. E. F)

Hackensack River watershed: OradelVLk. Tappan/Lk. DeForestfWoodclifT Lk, Reservoirs.

_. - .

TIERRA-A-017735
SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM TELECOJS NOTE

,

CONTROL NO DATE TIME

02-96-11-0044 04/14/97 1125

DISTRIBUTION'

Keegan Landfill file

BETWEEN OF PHONE

Carol (Donnelly) McDonald Kearny Water Departmenl (201) 991-2671

AND @ K Campbell rl

-_. _.-

DISCUSSION

Ms. McDonald confinned that the City of Kearny receives its drinking water supply from the Wanaque

Reservoir; the City currently o\\ons 13(Va of the reservoir. She stated that there are no private drinking water wells.

although industrial wells do exist. The City also supplies water ro the community of East Nev.'aTk. She noted

that East Newark has one industriill well (for a cement company l.

Ms. McDonald stated that the City of Harrison receives its drinking water supply from the Passaic Valley

Water Commission.

She provided the follo\\ing J\IDEP contan for water supply systems in Hudson County:

I

Brian Keune - (609) 292-5550

Mr. Keune may be able to assist us with county-wide water supply infonnation based on Public Water Supply

ID Nwnbers. "-

,

!

ACTION ITEMS:

,

,

'-"-.

"-

".,

Au. A

TIERRA-A-017736
SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM TELECO:\ NOTE j

CONTROL NO: DATE: TIME:

02 -96-11.()()44 06/04/97 1455

DISTRIBUTION:

Keegan LandfiIl file l

BETWEEN OF PHO'iE

Anthony Df:Barros Newark ·Departtnent of Engineering 120 I 25(>··1'16<

AND

K.Campbell@

DISCUSSION

Mr. DeBarros confinned that the City of Newark obtains its drinking water supply from the Pequannock

watershed (W. Milford Twp .• Passaic County) and the Wanaque Reservoir (Ringwood. Passaic County'). Nearb;

surface water bodies, such as Weequahic Lake and the local ponion of the Passaic River. are not utilized for

drinking water supply. There are no known private drinking water wells: however. groundwater may be used for

I industrial purposes.

The City also maintains a balancing reservoir in Cedar Grove. which holds water from the Pequannock

watershed. The balancing reservoir tends to be used to alleviate substantial fiow siruations (e.g .. large-scale

firefighting), although the reservoir can be used and is used for drinking water supply,

!

"'" I

"'"~

"'"

"'"

"'"

,

""'. _._- . _ ..

----- ... _- ..

"'"

,

ACTION ITEMS:

~

"'"

~.

"'" I

~

l?J.1I

TIERRA-A-017737
I SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPO:\,SE TEAM TELECOi\' I'.;OTE

1145

BETWEEN OF

Bob Coup. Water Purveyor l"onh Arlington Water Urilm Service

PHONE

(201) 955·5665

I

A}..1)

K Campbell @

DISCUSSION

1 Mr. Coup stated that North Arlington purchases its water in bulk from the Passaic Valley Water Conunission.

No groundwater is used for municipal supply. He is not aware of any private drinking water wells. In l

emergency siruations only. they may supply waler 10 Lyndhurst.

I

(The "Arlington" thaI appears on the USGS quadrangle near North J\rlington is acrually considered pan of

I ?\'onh .~linglOn).

~

I

~

~ ._--

I ""\

,

'\

I ~ .. __ ._-

,

.~

~

~

~

--S I

ACTIO)\; ITEMS: S

I

""

Att. (

TIERRA-A-017738
SUPE RFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM TELECOl'\ NOTE I CONTROL NO: DATE. TI~1E

02-96-11-0044 06/04/97 1121 I DISTRIBUTION

Keegan Landfill file

... _ .. ...,-- .,-- -- -

._...

BETWEEN' OF PHONE

Bob Lorfing, Principal Engineer Jersey City Water Department (201) 54i-4598

I ~ampbell

-- - ... _. ... _ .

&

DISCUSSION

Mr. Lorfing confirmed that the City of Jersey City receives its drinking \vater supply from the Boomon

Reservoir. No groundwater is used for municipal supply. He stated that there are no private drinking water wells.

The City also supplies water in bulk to the cities of Hoboken. Lyndhurst. and West Caldwell. In addition. they

have an agreement to sell some water to United Water Resources (U\VR). The City still 0\\115 the distribution

system, while UWR is the operator.

The two open-air reservoirs visible on the USGS quadrangle for Jersey City are closed: they are not currently

---

usable as reservoirs, as the containment wails for both have been breached.

No surface water intakes used for drinking water are knO\Vl1 to exist in the area.

I For further information regarding UWR water supplies. he suggested contacting MiChael Barnes (U\VR).

""

""

"" I

--~

""

"" I

~

ACTION ITEMS:

~

""

""~

- - .....- ~

~r'l

TIERRA-A-017739
SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM TELECOi\ NOTE

I

DISTRIBL:TION

Keega!l Landfill file

COl>;TROLNO DATE TIME

02-96-1 !-0044 06'04/97 1435

I Chns!!!!e Miller. Pubhc Affairs Umted Water Resources (LiWR)

PHO:-.:E

(800) 575-4433 T

BETWEEN OF

AND

K Ca.rnpbell @

DISCL:SSION

Ms. Miller confirmed that UWR supplies drinking water to the communities of Secaucus and Weehawken.

in addition to other communities. For the sources of drinking water supply, she ",ill transfer me to Deb Rizzi

in the Corporate Communications Department.

\

\

\

r ACTION ITEMS: ~

\

\

\

TIERRA-A-017740
I SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM TELECO!\ !\OTE !

CONTROL NO: DATE: TIME

02-96-11-0044 06/04/97 1440

DISTRIBUTION:

Keegan Landfill file

BETWEEN: OF PHONE

Deb Rizzi. Corporate Communications Umted \Vater Resources rUWR \ COI,16-·256-

AND @

K Campbell

DISCUSSION

..._- -- . - .

Ms. Rizzi confirmed that UWR obtains its drinking water supples from: the Hackensack River watershed.

the Oradell Reservoir, the Lake Tappan Reservoir. the Lake DeForest Reservoir. and the Woodcliff Lake

Reservoir; all sources are outside the area of concern. During drought conditions. UVv"R has the capability to

~w water from the Passaic River Basin, northwest of Oradell.

--,.

She suggested that for future inquiries, we may be bener served by calling Leo Fung in the Engineering

I Department at (201) 767·9300, ext. 6011.

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

!

~

~

~

..__ ... _ .. ~

ACTION ITEMS:

. -- ._- . - ~

~

s

~ I

~ I {

Au. r

TIERRA-A-017741
REFERENCE NO.1 2

TIERRA-A-017742
SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM TELECON NOTE

CON1KOLNO: DATE: ilME:

02-96-11-0044 06/23/97 0928

DIS N:

Keegan Landfill file

Br;Twt-J::,N: OF Essex County PHO/';"E

Vince Bucci, Engineer Parks Department (973) 268-3500

AND

K. Campbell (i;j)

ulSCUSSION

Mr. Bucci confirmed that the Essex County Parks Department currently operates one well at the Branch

Brook Park location. The well is used solely for re-filling Branch Brook Pond. in order to maintain a certain

water level and to prevent stagnation.

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~.

~

I

~

~

ACTION ITEMS:

_._- ._---" ... ~

"(

~

~

"

)2:[. /'Z.

TIERRA-A-017743
REFERENCE NO. 13

TIERRA-A-017744
Fridav

December 14, 1990

Part II

Environmental

Protection Agency

40 CFR Part 300

Hazard Ranf<ing System; Final RuJe

TIERRA-A-017745
-

'"

~.

1

1

1

1

Puerto Rico

~lO

10

FIGURE 3·2

NET PRECIPITATION FACTOR VALUES

I

{

-"

-

TIERRA-A-017746
51600 Fedenl Register I Vol. 55. No. !41. / Friday. December 14. 1990 I Rules and Regulations

-When melIIDfed monthly'

evapotnmaplrlllion la notllvailable.

calculate monthly potential

evapotrantplrallon (E,) at followa:

E, - 0.8 PI {10 T.ln·

where:

E.-Monthly potential

evapouanapiraUon [lnchea) for

month i

F.-Monthly lalltude adjusting value

formon" I.

T,-Mean monlbly temperature (OCI

fOl'..monlhI.

12

J = :I(T,/S) \....

i-1

8 - 6.7S X 10-'1'-7.71 X 10" P+

1.79X10- t

1+0.49239

Select the latitude adju.ting value lor each

month from Table 3-3. For lalitudet lower

than 50· North or 20· Soulh. determine the

monthly latitude adjuating value by

interpolation.

• Calculate monlbly net precipitation by

21ubtracting monthly evapotran.piration lor

TABLE 3-3.-MONTHLY LATrruDE ADJUSTING VALUES.

monthly potential evapotranspiration) from

monthly precipitation. If evapolran.pil1llion

lor potential evapotranapiralion) exceeds

precipitation for a month. auign that month a

net precipitation value ofO.

• Calculale the annual net precipitation by

summing the monthly net precipilation

values.

• Based on the annual net precipitation.

asti/i" a net precipitation faclor value from

Table 3-4.

Enter the value assigned from Figure ~2 or

from Table 3-4. as appropriate. in Table ~1.

lJIti1ude • Month

(~J J8n. Feb. March April Mlly I June July August Sept I Oct I Nov. I Dec.

~5O

45 N

N 0.74

0.80 0.11

0.78

1.02

••02 1.15 1.33 1.38 1.37 1.25 1.06 0.92 0.76 0.70

40 N 0.1-4 0.83 1.03

1.13 1.28 ,.29 1.31 1.21 U)~ 0.94 0.79 0.75

35 N 0.17 ll.e5 1.03

1.11 1.24 U5 1.27 1.18 1.04 0.1Ie 0.83 0.8t

30 N O.DO 0.17 1.03 1.0l!

1.09 1.21 121 123 1.18 1.03 0.97 0.89 0.8S

20N 0.95 1).90 1.03 1.05

1.19 1.17 1.20 1.14 1.03 0.98 0.99 0.88

10 N 1.00 0.11 1.03

1.13 1.11 . 1..14 1.11 1.02 1.00 0.93 .o.9-l

0 UN C.'" t.04 1.01

1.03 1.08 1.06 1.0l! 1.07. 1.02 1.02 0.98 0.'99

10 S 1.De 0.117 1.05 0.99

1.04 1.01 l.o.c 1004 1.0t . 1.04 1:(11 1.0l 1.00 0.9$ 1.00 1.02 205 1.14 0.119 1.05 0.97 1.00 I '.08 1.05 I.Oil 0.96 0.91 0.95 0.99 1.00 1.08 1.09 1.15

• Do not rounello_t inlegIef.

• FOt unlisled IaIJluOel--.rlhan SO" North-or 20" -South. ~lem>lne the .. Illude lIdrust"'O V1llue by InletpeMalioh.

TABLE 3-4.-NET PRECIPITATION FACTOR

VAlUES

Net pracIpItalilln (mchesJ

0------- -1

Gr •• ler than 0 to 5 -1

Gr •• ter than 5 to 15 1

K ~ Grealer than 15 to -;,tU.. -I

Greaterthan 30 -1

.~,. o

,

3

6~

10

3.1.2.3 Depth t. aquifer. Evaluate depth

to aquifer by detennlnlng the depth from the

loweat known point or hazardolll lubltances

al a lite to the top DrIba aquifer being

evaluated. conllderinl aU layel'lln thai

interval. Meaaure the depth to an aqulrer u

Ihe diltancefrom tha Rrface 10 the top et.the

aquifer minua Ibe dillanee from ·thlrlurface

to the lowelt known point of huardoul

lubstlncea eliglbldo be eM.luated for &tat

aquifer. In evaluatlq depth to aquJfer In

karttlerrain, atlip a thlcknenllfO feet1o.a

kartt aquifer that uriderll9 any portlODof the

soureea .t the Ilte.llaled on the calcuJlI'ted

depth. a .. lgn a val. from Table 3-3 to the

depth 10 aquifer fa~or.

DetenDlne the d~ 10 aquifer oniy II't

locations wllhln 1IIlllel of the aouree. at the

sile. eltcept: If oblerved ground water

conlamination attributable to lourees at the

alte extends more than 2 milea beyond Ibese

.oure ... use any location within the Iimita of

thia observed ground water contamination

when evaluating the depth to aquifer factor

for any aquifer that doea not have an

obaerved release. IIthe neeenary geologic

infOnDation it .vallable at multiple location •.

calculate the depth~o aquifer at each

location. Use :the location havin!! the 'malle,'

depth to an~ 'the faeror value. Enler this

value In Table ~1.

TABLE 3-S.-DEPTH TO AOUIFER FACTOR

VALUES

Depth 10 aQutter· (feet I I "S$iQned

. value

l.ftI than ~ eQualto 25 _.._ 1 5

Gnlatet than 25 to 250-_ _ _..- 1 3

Gte.tet than 250__ ..__ . I

• U.. depth of all layers belWeet'l the hazardous

aatance. and aquilar. AMogn a thickness of 0 flHlt

110 any Iutm aquillW tl1IIl unoenl8S any por!JOn 0' the

"IOvrCft at the iii•.

3.1.2.4 Trav~Jlime. Evaluate the trovel

lime Tactor baaed on Chef111010glcmlHeriah in

the interval between the ImYest knOll", point

of hnardDua IIlbat"nce. at the .~ aDd tlIe

top of the aquifer b~ng evaluated. Assign a

value to the travel tillle faeter as followl;

.• If the depth to aquifer (lee aection 3.1':'3)

i' 10 Ieet or less. attign a value of 35.

• II..for the interval being evaluated. all

layers that underlie a portion of the aourees

at the sile are karst. a .. ign a value of 35.

• Otherwise:

-Selectlhe lowest hydraulic conducthity

layer(a' from wilbin the above Interval.

Consider only IByert .1 least 3 feel

thick. However. do not con.ider iByert

or portiona 01IByert within the lirtt 10

feel of the depth to the aquifer.

-DetenDine hydraullc conducUvfliea (or

individuallayera from Tabla 3-6 or

from in-aUu or laboratory telta. Uae

representative. meBtured. hydraulic

conductivity values whenever

available.

-If more than one layer has the tame

lowelt hydraullc conducUvity. include

all luch layert and lum their

thickne .. es. A.. ign a thickne .. of 0

(eetlo a karsllByer that underliea any

portion of the SOUTeet at the alte.

-Attign a value from Table ~7 to the

travel time (aclor. billed on lhe

Chickne.. and hydraulic conductivil)-

of the loweal hydraulic conductivity

lay~rls).

.

.1

TIERRA-A-017747
Federal Register I Vol. 55. No. 241. I Friday, December 14. 1990 I Rules and Regulations 51601

TABLE 3-6.-HvORAUUC CONOUCTlVTTYOF GEOlOGIC MATERIALS

TrPll of material

,'.

Clay: lOWDermMbiIil'( '81(ctlf!ll)aa lI\lraclt6N tin): !It\a'e; unlraetl.l'ed mewnorphic: .,., ~ RldIa .-------------1

1

$';1; lOeuer. lillY CIa.,.; -.:imenU trial .,.. predOmonanlly Uts; moder.tell' perTnlIabIe .. (~ IM'IOOnSOlldIIled llII. or comOIICI III Wl1h

IO(M I,.cues': law ll8""Nbllily IWMstDna end cloiomolell (no ~tl; low.penneebillly aeDOS\On8; low ~ 1rKU..:! ~ en:I I mewn\OllltllC rodtS____ ._.. __. _

$.:lnc1S; SI/'lCly SIlts: 141dtmen'1 thaI er. predoomIn&n. lIy .. net. I'igh/\r perme.bl4t 1aJ8N6-iji ..... UI1COnS(lj;d. .ted or COII'lI)Kf and highly fnIcUwd); I

pe.t mooera'eIy pem'leaOle Iolnnlones and dOlomrtes (no lUIml; modef pen-eIe ~ ~ ~ ~ q>eoua . .nd .... mQfJlhc I'OCQ _. •

Gt .... ~ de:.n land; bgNy ~ lractwed ogneous end ~ racks; penneabIe DIoUII; ..... ~ and doIamitesl _

TABLE 3-7.-TRAVa TIME FACTOR VAlUES·

10-'

10-'

- .. 10

10-'

10- a

II1In :;=r::~I-GrIChity 3 IIlI lhwi 5 10 .... lOO! .. ,.

S 100· 10 500 i lh8n SOO ------------------------~~-------·~-3S--·'"",-:ss--~i25

35 25! 15 I 15

15 15 I 5 5

S 5 1 1

Hydraujic COMuetMty IcmJl8C)

G'~al. than or 8I:aAIol1o 10·'------- ...•.._.. 1

Less It\an 10"10 10"' . _. _

Les.s tI'IAn 10-'10 10- ' _

le" lhan 10-'.--.---------- .1

• II oeplh 10 8qUler - 10lee1 or Il!Ss or K. lor the i11en.-ellloenlllYllluMoeoCl. aft ..,.... 8W1 undwle a POflIOn cd the ~ ., .. aile _ "-'It. ISS'gI'l • YUM 01 35.

• Co....oor only ~~~ alleasl 3.10It lroIck. 00 Dol c:DmldeI .. .,era or pot\iOna 04 llrytn -nn die tal 10IHI of !he depth lD die ~.

Delermine travd lime only allocation.

within 2 milel of the souta!s at the site.

e:.;c~pt: i[ observed ground waler

conlamination Rttributable 10 soW"Cesat the

si:e extendl more than % miles beyond these

sources. ule any location wilhin the Iimill of

lhi' observed ground water conlazniJtation

....hen evalnating the tnIvelli:ne fat:tcr tor any

aquifer that does not aave .n oblerved

release. U lhe necessary .ubsurlace @eologic

ir:fonnalion is eveil.hle III multiple locations..

e':alua Ie th~ travel time factor at ~ach

location. Use the localion hning the !li~hesl

travel lime factor Yalue to ulign the faclor

valu~ for the aquifer. Enter this val:J~ in

T .Jble 3--1.

3.1.2.5 Calculotion ofpD~nlial:o l'f!Jt'ost'

factar value. Sum the fector ".lue, for net

preClpit<Jtion.depth to aqw.feor.lUldtravel

lime. IInd multiply this lum by the faclor

\'alu~ for conlainmenl. Anign thil producl II'

th~ nOlenliallo rele .. e f.clor value for the

8::juirer. Enler thil value in Tllble 3-1.

3.1.3 Colr:ulotion of likelihood of releast'

lactar cutegory VQJ~. Uan obBerved relelll~

is established for an aquifer .... ign the

oll.erved rele.se lactor yallllllof S50 •• lhi!

Likelihood of relea.e factor category ulue for

thalllq1.lifer. Otherwise. lIuillll the potential

to relea.e [actor value for that aqoifer al the

likelihood of releale value. Enm t.lle value

assigned in Table 3-1.

3.2 Waste chorocteristlC8 • .Evaillale the

...ast~ charactenslics factor category for an

aquifer baaed on two factors: lcaicityl

mobility and hazardoua weale quantity.

Evaluate only thOle haz.ardoua lobslancel

.vailable to migrate from the strnrCes at the

.il~to ground water. Such hazardOUI

substancel include:

• Hazardous .ub.tancea that meet the

aileria for an observed release to ground

....ter.

• All hazardous .ubstances auocialed

With a IOurc:e thai baa 11 ground water

contllinment factor ValUII greater than 0 rlee

.ections %.U 2.2.3. and :U.2.1).

3.2.1 Toxicity/mobility. For each

h<tzardous lubllance. "Sign a 10Jticily factor

value. a mobilily factor value. &lid a

combined toxicity/mobility factor value II

specified in the faDowing: aect.I_ 5eJect the

tOXicity/mobility factor value for the aquifer

b"ing evaluated as .pecified ill aec:lion 3.2.1-1.

3.2...1.1 Ttuil:ity. Au.iF a IcWc.ity (actar

value 10 each hazardoua mbstance ••

specified illSec:ticrD 2.'1.1.1.

121.2 MobiJity. Aaaign. mobility fact.or

value to -.:b auardoua IUbslmlce for the

aquifer being "aluated II foUowl:

., Forey hazardous lubalal1Cl!that meetl

the criteria for an observed releBle by

c.hemicalanalysit 10 one or Illore aquifers

-mtderlyi"8 the I01D'1ZlI at the .ile. ~srdJesa

at the aquifer being ev.luated. .uign a

mobility factor value of 1.

• For any baramous rnbstance thlll doel

nol meel the aiteria for .n ob.erved releaac.

by chemical analy.i. to .t least one of the

aquifers. a .. igD that ha:ut'doua .ub.teee a

mobility factor nJ1,Ie from Table 3-3 for the

aquifer beins evaruated. bued on it. water

solubility and dilbibutlon coefficient (KJ.

• !flbe bazardoua lubal4lDCflc.&nnolbe

... igned a mobility factor value becau.e data

en ill water .ulubiUly or distribution

coefIiciesu are DOl aniJa ble. uae other

hazardoua .obuance:a fOf'which infol'1Nltion

ia available iD naJaating the pathway.

TABLE 3-8.-GAOUNO WATER MOBtUTY FACTOR VAlUES"

1. 0is_·_1rlbutiDn coetlidern (K.J lmllgl

W~er $01~:,ty lmgll) ,Ir

I '[ r- -

~, ~IO I ~.~ I ~1.000

, ! ~--

1't~11lS Iouid' _._._._. __ .__ . . --1

~~:::: ::: ~~··ioo~-======_-==-_:__=:::·:::::~::___=:::::====_- ~l

G'~lIler Il\an 0.01to 1 ..._--._-.--- 1

d"~ II'Ian 01 equal to 0.01 ------- .__ - .._--.. • 1

1 1 Oll1 0.0001

f f 0.01 O.ooof

0.2 0.2 0.002 bID' •

0.002 0.002 bl0- • blO' ,

2lr1cr' 2xl0-' 2x10" 2x10-·

·00 noi round io newest "'I~.

• Use 11the hazarclous 1UOS18tlQ8.. po-esen1or oeoosrted .s IIlIQud.

• Use 11\he P<111l'8 InlIN1I1Irom I/le SOI6ce 10 ,~ lQUIIar Demg eY3ru.1~ ...... r~1

p.4

TIERRA-A-017748
Federal Register I Vol. 55. No. 241, / Friday. Dcccr.1hcr 14. 1990 / Rules Lind Regulations 51611

Drainage area. Detennlne the drainage

area for Ihe loureel .t the lite. Include In Ihil

dr.lnage area both the louree areel end the

area upgradicnl of tha loureea. but exclude

.ny POri ion 01 !hil drainage area for which

runoff i' diverted from entering the louree'

by Itonn lewel'S or run·on control and/or

runorr management Iyltem •. Assign a

drainnge area value for the walershed from

Table 4-3.

5011 group. Bued on Ihe predominant soU

group within Ihe drainage area delcribed

above. l15,ign •• oll·group designation lor the

watershed from Tabl, 4-4 II follow,:

• Select the predominant soli group al Ihat

type which compriael the largest total area

wilhin the applicable drainage area.

• If a predominant .011 group cennot be

delineated. select that loil group In the

drainage area that ylelda the hlghell value for

the runoff faclor.

Calculation of runoff faclor value. Auign a

combined rainfall/runoff value for the

watershed from Table 4-5. bued on the 2·

year. 24·hour rainfall and the loil group

de,ignation. Derennine the runoff factor

value for the watenhed from Table ~

baaed on the rainIall/runoff and drainage

area values. Enter the runoff factor value in

Table 4-1.

TABLE 4-3.-0RAINAGE AREA VALUES

Dnlina911area (acrel)

I

2

3

•

Less !tIln 50 __ ._. _

50 to 250 _._ -1

G,.,ter If\In 250 to 1,000 •

Grealer than 1.000. __ . _

TABLE 4-4.-S0IL GROUP OESIGNATIONS

SlM1acI soil deacriplion

o

Soil grlMl

designation

Coarae-textured loils with hi9h Infil.

tration ratlll IIor BllIrfIIlltt. landl,

Iolmy sancll).

Medium-textured soill with modBfate

inlil1rlbon rat" (tor example.

sandy Ioams. Ioama).

ModIItal...,. ti"..tmur.d IOiIs w!IJ'l

low inliltnltion ral" (tor example.

"'ty Ioerns. 1i11S.sanely day IOama).

-';>F'-.t...,ured IIOda willi very low Inlil-

!ration retes llor 1llI'"l)Ie. clays,

sandy clava. lilly day 1Oa-. clay

lOam•. Iilty dllval: Of Imper", .. tlle

llur1lcea Ilor eKBmPle. pavement).

A

B

c

TABLE 4-S.-RAINFAuJRuNOFF VALUES

2 Year 2. heM' raintal 1 Sol group designation

(inCheS' A B C 0

Lilli If\In 1.0 .........._ 0 0 ~ 3

1010 Iesa "'an '.5_. 0 1 2 3

1.5 10 leal than 2.0_ 0 2 ! 3 • 2.0 to less !hili 2.5._ .... ., 2 3 4

2.5 to Iesa than 3.0 _ 2 3 • • 3.0 10 less II'Iln 3.5 ..._ .. 2 3 •

5

3.5 or grlater ....__ .__ 3 • I

5 6

TABLE 4-6.-RuNOFF FACTOFl VALUES

Drainage iRllinlall'l\InoH value ! ar•• ;

Vlliull I

0 1 I 2 3 i • i 5 6

I 0 0 0 1 ................ , I 1 1 1

;::::::::::::::::! 0 0 1 I 2 :J •

0 0 I :J 1 II 15

4 ..•.... •........ 1 0

, 2 7 17 25 25

4.1.2.1.2.1.3 Distance ta surface water.

Evaluate the distance to lurface waler as the

Ihorte'I di'tance. along the overland

,esment. from any .ource wilh a surface

water containment faclor value greater than 0

to either the mean high water level for tidal

waters or the mean water level for other

lurlace waters. Based on this distance. assign

a value from Table 4-7 to the distance to

surface water faclor for the water'hed. Enter

Ihis value in Table 4-1.

4.1..2.1.2.1.4 Calculalion of factor ~'aluefor

potentia/to release by overland flOW. Sum

Ihe factor values lor runofl and distance to

.urlace water for the watershed and multiply

this lum by the laclor value for containment.

ASlign the resulting product 81 the faclor

value for potential to releese by overland

flow for the water,hed. Enter this value in

Table 4-1.

4.1.:U.2.2 Potentiolto release by flood.

Evaluate potential to relea'e by flood for

each watershed a, Ihe product of two factors:

containment (flood) and flood frequency.

Evaluate potential to relea'e by flood

separately for each .ource that is within the

water'hed. Furthermore. for each source.

evaluale potenlial to release b~' flood

separalely for each category of floodplain in

which the source lie •. [See .eclion 4.1.2.1.::.2.2

for the applicable floodplain categories.)

Calculate Ihe value for the potential 10

releese by nood factor 8S specified in

4.1.2.1.2.2.3.

4.1.2.1.2.2.1 Containment (flood). For each

source within the walersned. separately

evaluate the containment (nood) lactor lor

each category of floodplain in which the

source is partially or wholly located. Assign a

containment (flood) factor value from Table

H to each floodplain category applicable to

that .ource. Assign a containment [flood)

factor value 01010 each floodplain category

in which Ihe louree doe' nollie.

4.1.2.1.2.2.2 Flood frequency. For e~ch

80urce within the watershed, separately

evaluate the flood frequency factor for each

category of noodplain in which the source i'

partially or wholly located. A,siEtn 8 flood

frequency factor value lrom Table 4-{l 10 each

floodplain category In which the source i'

located.

4.1.2.1.2.2.3 Calculation of factor "aiue for

potential to release by flood. For each source

within the warershed and for each category

of floodplain in which the lource II partially

or wholly located. calculate a leparate

potential 10 relene by flood factor value.

Calculate thi, value as the product olthe

containment (flood) value and the flood

frequency value applicable to the source for

the floodplain category. Select the highest

value calculated lor those source. that meet

the minimum size requirement ,pecified in

seclion 4.1.2.1.2.1.1 and asslEln it as the nllue

for rne potential to relea'e by flood factor for

the watershed. However. if. for this

wlllerlhed. no lource at the 'fte meets the

minimum size requirement. select the hi~hcsl

value calculated for the louree' at the 'Ite

eliRible 10 be evaluated for this watersned

and assign il as the value for this laclor.

TABLE 4-7-DISTANCE TO SUFlFACE

WATER FACTOFl VALUES

Distano. Aaslgned

value

2S

20

Ie

9

6

3

Less than 100 leeL __ .._ ..

100 leetto 500 leel. _. .

G,uter thin 500 leetlo 1.000 leel. ..

Greeter Itlln 1.ll00 leet to 2.500 'eel .

G,eeter !tIan 2.500 leet to 1.5 miles ..

Grelle, than 1.5 mile, to 2 mitn._ •.

TABLE 4-B-CoNTAlNMENT (FLOOD)

FACTOR VALUeS

Containment crIterta As.signed

value

Documentation that containmenl et

the IIOt.lrceis de'igned. eonsuuet·

8<1. operaled, and mamtainecl to

preyent I washout of hIIzardous

substlncas by the 1100d being ..,.1-

uated.

Other _ _ ~~

o

10

TABLE 4-9.-FLOOD FREQUENCY FACTOR

VALUES

FloodPlain category

50

50

25

1

o

Sou'CI floods annually .

Sou'ce In IO·year lloodplaln __ ..

Source In HID-year lIoOClPlain __ .

Source in SOD·year llOOdpl,," __ .

None 01 above _ .

I

Enter thi' highest potenlialto releaae by

flood factor value for the water.hed in Table

4-1. 81 well as the \'alue' for containment

(flood) and flood frequency that yield this

highe,t value.

4.1.2.1.2.3 Calculation of potential to

release factor '·olue. Sum the factor values

auigned to the watershed for potenlialto

release by overland flow and potential to

release by nood. Assign tnil lum .. the

potential to release factor value for the

watershed. subject to I maximum value of

500. Enter this value in Table 4-1.

4.1.2.1.3 Calculation of drinking water

threat·likelihood of re/eose factor category

value. If an ob.erved relea.e Is established

for the watershed. usign the observed

release faclor value of 550 81 the likelihood 01

relea.e factor category value for that

water,hed. Otherw.le. alaign the potential 10

releue factor value for thai watershed lIS tne

likelihood of relea'e factor category value for

that watershed. Enter the value usigned in

Table 4-1.

4.1.2.2 Drinking water threat. waste

choractenstlcs. Evaluate the was Ie

charactem tics factor category for 88ch

TIERRA-A-017749
Federal Register I VoL 55. No. 241. I Friday. December 14. 1990 I Rules and RegulatJOQS .51613

'.

the haurdou. lab.lance with the ruJlhes.

toxicity /perat.tence faclor value lor tba

watenhed to auign thelolticllyjpenialence

faClor value for Ihe drlnkil\l waler Ihreat for

Ihe W1Itershed.Enler Ibl. value In Table 4-1.

'.1~ Hazardoul waste quanlity.

Assign a hazardous wBlte quantily factor

value for the w81erslJed 81 lpeCiried in

secllon %.4.2. Entu thi. value i.a Table 4-1.

4.1.2.2.3 CaJcuJauOD Df drinJcjng woler

IhlY!Ol·waSlft cJraracleristics {ac1or cQLe80ry

value. Multiply the IOxWly/pera.u ~ a.t:Ld

h.a:z.ardoUi waslAlquantity faclor ....JIIU for

the watershed. lubject to.8 maJUlIIUIll prod.ucl

of 1 II: 10'.Baaed on !hil product. ... ~ •

valOieUoln Table ~71_a-LU.ll to the

drinking waler tbnal-wute chuacteri.lic~

(actor C8l.e8O'Y lot the walersllecl. Enler IhlS

value in Table ~1.

TABLE 4-12.-ToXICITY/PERSrsn:NCE FACTOR VALUES·

T~'lIC'tl:lrVlM'"

~ 'aclo. value I '0.000 1.(lOO 100 14 f 0

1.0 .. ---_... 10.000 1.DOO 100 WI , 0

o.~....._.. ....._-_._. __........._......._ ..._- ._-_. ....000 <100 .e • Q." 0

0.01 •.___ ..__ ..________ •______ .••.

-

100 70 7 OJ QJ)1 0

0.tIOO1__ ......_ .•.____ ..._.•__ .•.•__ ._.._ .......__ ._•.••._. ____________ 7 0.7 0.01 0.001 0.0007 0

4.1.%.3 DrinJci.ng wale thl"9CJl-ta~tJ.

EvalualAlthe Ulllell facmr category for each

walel1lhed ba.ed on three f.ct.Drs: MBTe'IIt

inta kA!. population. and reeoUra!L

To n-an..te tbe neuest Intake and

population factors. delermine wnether the

l.8Jl'Iet81Irface ... t.I!f mtake. are wabte<:tto

&dual ot potetltial contamination aa speciI"~d

in .ectioa '.1.1.2. Vae either an obael"Y1!d

"*- baaed. DO direct obser-nlion at the

intau or the e:qlOaurl! CODOl!Tltrllti~ from

88mples (or compllrllbJe A~) taken at or

beyond the tn.t.aketo make thia deLermination

(see sectiaa 4.1.%.1.1). 11M! expcware

concentrationl for. aample !that il. luriace

WilIer. benlb1c. or aedimenlll!llrlple} conlist

of the canee::ctnltiOnl of tboae buardOtl'

aub.tancea poruent that lite Jignifieantly

ablJft b.~ k-voe-II and attnbutllble at

least in part to the sale (!hat I..thoM

hazardOWl .ubst.8nce concenlra!kJnl that

meet the criteria {or an observed relea.e).

When an intake i. IU:b;ect to actual

contamination. evalu.ate it using LeV1!11

concentration. or Level n concentrations. U

the lIctulIl contamination i.ba.ed on aD

ob.erved release by direct oblervatiOil. u.e

LeV1!11I concentraliOil. for that intaka.

However. if the acLuaJ contamination i.

bued on an observed relellle froln .amples.

deteMtllne which level applies for the intake

by comparing the expo.ute concentrations

from 18mpie. (or compuaNe aampl.ea) to

health·baled benchmarlu as .pecified ill

leclion. 1.5.1 and 2.5.2. Uae the health·baed

benchmark. froln Tabil! :l-10 [section J-3.1) bI

determining the level 01 CODtamination £rom

8BJJlpl~. For contaminated lediml!.llll with no

identified louree. evaluate thB actua.l

contamination lUing Level IIconcentration.!

(.ee lection 4.1.1.2).

L1..2.3.1 Nearrlt itUiJh. Evaluate the

nearelt Intake fector billed on the drinking

water Intakes along the overland/nood

hazardou. IUbmllte ",~elien 'Path for the

watershed. Include stendbv ;ntll~ in

evaluating thhl f~Ot' only 'if !My lire U'St!1:l for

IUppl,. at Ielllt once a ~lIr.

TABLE 4-13.-SURFACE WATER Du..uTJON WEIGHTS

Assign the nearell intake factor a value as

loUo_ and ertter the vahle in Tahie 4-4:

• U oae or eore of the-e drilllrJDs ..-tIer

intakes ill M.lb;eet &II Lem IamastratioDJ as

llpeCifaed iD aection 4.LZ.3. assign • f8ctlX'

value of 50.

• IiJ1Dt. but if ClIIII Dr more of ~ .

drinkiDg waler i.tUaku ia allbiea to Level II

conceotratiDru.lIUiga. £adm' value 4f 45.

• U none of thue drinJtizlI water mtake. is

subject to Levell or Level n~t1ona.

dllU!m1iae the nearest of 1beae driPk.iDs water

intakeL •• meuured !ram the probable point

of enlIy [or from the point where

meuutemeDl beginJ for oontlmin.ated

sediments with DO identified.8OW'Ol!~ A •• ign

a dilution weight from Table 4-13 »tlUs

Intake. bued on the type ol.-fat:a W.8ter

body iD wbich 1t ia located. Multiply W.

dilution weight by :za. round 1ha product to

the Dearest inte,er. and aulgn Jl u tAe factor

value.

AMigo the dilutiDn weight from Table 4-13

III fonowa:

Flow ct\a.acter,S1ica

M."'"'lIl W'&"'" .._._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.IlM& than 10 c:ls _ .. .._ .

=e-::::; =::::=::. ..~==:=~=::::::::::::==::::::::::::::::::~~=J~,~O:=;OO··i.;-1·.000-~_=::::::.~~-:::=:=:::::::::::=::::::::_ __

L.8rg. str.am 10....... j Gt_1IWI t.OOO" 10.000 et _ __ _ __ _

g:~~~;:~:~~~;:::~~~::: ....~~~~~~~~~:~;~;~:~ §:~:~~;~~~~~~~~;;;:~~~:

Moderate oepth ocelln zone • Dt Great Llkll -- ••••_- __ J Flow not &PPlIcable. llePth 20 10 200 1l1li1 _ ••••_._._ _ .

DeeD oceln zone • Dt Great Like _ __ _ __ . 1 Flow nol appllC&llle. deplh oretter Iltan 200 leet .._ ..__.._._ _ _._ ..

3·m,le m"""" zone In QUiet 1low"'O nYlIf ._ ._ ••••••_ 10 eft or 0'.. 1 _ _ __ __ _ __ _

,

0.1

0.01

0.001

0.0001

0.00001

0.0001

0.0001

0.00001

0.0D0D05

0.5

• T.. al .ae:tllaJ<e a. a M9llrale type 01 "aiM body IInd BSSIgn • dilutIOn -.ghl lIS lIP1tC11oed,n lellt

• Do nol round 10 ....... t '"t ....

• ch - CUboc: '1IIt1 per aec:ond

• Embayments. Ilart>ors. aouncl •• estuann. back bays. tagoons. _nanetll .• Ie.. se_anl 'rom mouthI 0' rivera .net tandwanl lrom baseline III Terrt10riaI Sea.

• SU ... nl from b8S8lme 0' Ten1lonal SeL ThIS basellnll rllPl'llsents lI\II generellZltd U.S. coastlIne. II Is pe.atlel 10 the MlWlnl 1Irnt101 lI\II Ten1lonaJ Sea and

Olhe' mamlme hmns .Lith as IN '" .. bounctary 01 the F.oeral flSh_ /UrlSdK:llOil and the ~mrt 01 Stal," runS(!'C\IOn ut'lOet the Submerged Landi Act. as amended

• For a m'er (Inal i•.• uriace waler body

lypl!l specified in Table 4-13 1II minimal

stream through very large river). anign a

dilution weillht based on the average annual

flow in lhe river lit lhe intake. If available.

use the average annual di.charge 81 defined

in the U.S. Geological Survey Waler

Reaourcel Dati Annual Report. Otherwi.e.

estimate the lVerage sMual now.

• For a lake. allign II dilution weight ss

rollows:

-For a lake that hlll .uriace water now

entering the lIke. assign a dilution

weight bllled on the sum of the

TIERRA-A-017750
'0·' ~. ,.

,~-

", .- '.,

)

.. '-~.

,

• <

REFERENCE NO. 14

TIERRA-A-017751
",

..

I

f

:.oj.: ::"•.. ~, ~

)t~ilf:'~;\'-1

:.'

.~ ' .

.\"

{:; ~ '.::.

"

...

REFERENCE NO. 15

TIERRA-A-017752
Surface Water Quality Standards

N.J.A.C. 7:98

NEW JERSEY DEPAmMENT OF ENVlRONIIEHTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY

OffIce of Land and WIter PfAnnlng

Aprf11*

•

pol

TIERRA-A-017753l
"Disinfection" means the removal, destruction, or inactivation of pathogenic and

indicator organisms.

"DRBC" means Delaware River Basin Commission.

"EC50" means the median effective concentration of a toxic substance expressed as a

statistical estimate of the concentration that has a specified adverse effect on 50

percent of the test organisms under specified test conditions, based on the results of an

acute bioassay.

"Epilimnion" means the freely circulating upper region of a thermally stratified

waterbody extending from the surface to the thermocline.

"Existing uses" means those uses actually attained in the waterbody on or after

November 28, 1975. whether or not they are incJuded in the Surface Water Quality

Standards.

"Federal Ad" means the "Federal Water Pollution Control Acf' (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et

seq.) including aU subsequent supplements and amendments.

"Flow-through bioassay· means a toxicity test in which the test solutions flow into and

out of the test chambers on a once-through basis for the duration of the test, in

accordance with N.J.AC. 7:18.

"Fresh water(sY' means aU nontidal and tidal waters generally having a salinity, due to

natural sources, of less than or equal to 3.5 parts per thousand at mean high tide.

"FW' means the general surface water classification applied to fresh waters.

"FW1" means those fresh waters that originate in and are wholly within Federal or

State parks, forests, fish and wildlife lands and other special holdings, that are to be

. maintained in their naturar stare of quality (set aside for posterity) and not subjected to

any man-made wastewater discharges, as designated in N.J.AC. 7:9B-1.15(h) Table 6.

"F'N2" means the general surface water classification applied to those fresh waters

that are not designated as FW1 or Pine lands Waters.

"Groundwatert

means that portion of water beneath the land surface that is within the

zone of saturation (below the water table) where pore spaces are filled with water.

"Heat dissipation arealt means a mixing zone, as may be designated by the

Department, into which thermal effluents may be discharged for the purpose of mixing,

dispersing, or dissipating such effluents without creating nuisan'ces, hazardous

conditions, or violating the provisions of this subchapter.

-y- f" 2.

TIERRA-A-017754
"Measurable changes" means changes measured or determined by a biological.

chemical, physical, or analytical method, conducted in accordance with USEPA

- - approved methods as identified in 40 C.F.R. 136 or other analytical methods (for

example, mathematical models, ecological indices, etc.) approved by the Department,

that might adversely impact a water use (inclUding, but not limited to aesthetics).

"Mixing zones" means localized areas of surface waters, as may be designated by the

Department, into which wastewater effluents may be discharged for the purpose of

mixing, dispersing, or dissipating such effluents without creating nuisances or

hazardous conditions, or violating the provisions of this subchapter.

"Natural flow" means the water flow that would exist in a waterway without the addition

of flow of artificial origin.

"Natural water quality" means the water quality that would exist in a waterway or a

waterbody without the addition of water or waterbome substances from artificial origin.

"NJPDES" means New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System.

"NOEC" means the "no observable effect concentration", which is the highest

concantration of a toxic substance that has no adverse effect(s) on survival, growth, or

reproduction of species based upon the results of chronic toxicity testing.

"Nondegradation waters" means those waters set aside for posterity because of their

clarity, color, scenic setting, other characteristic of aesthetic value, unique ecological

significance, exceptional recreational significance, or exceptional water supply

signIficance. These waters include all waters designated as FW1 in this subchapter.

"Nonpersistent" means degrading relatively quickly, generally having a half·life of less

than 96 hours.

"Nontrout waters" means fre~h waters that have not been designated in this subchapter

as trout production or trout maintenance. These waters are generally not suitable for

trout because of their physical, chemical, or biological characteristics, but are suitable

for a wide variety of other fish species.

"NPDES" means National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System.

"NT' means nontrout waters.

"Nutrient" means a chemical element or compound, such as nitrogen or phosphorus,

\Nhich is essential to and promotes the growth and development of organisms.

"Outstanding National Resource Waters" means high quality waters that constitute an

outstanding national resource (for example, waters of NationailState Parks and Wildlife

_ / p.> TIERRA-A-017755
Refuges and waters of exceptional recreational or ecological significance) as

designated in N.J.A.C. 7:98-1.1 5(i).

"Persistent" means relatively resistant to degradation, generally having a half life of

over 96 hours.

"Pinelands waters" means all waters within the boundaries of the Pine/ands Area,

except those waters designated as FW1 in this subchapter, as established in the

Pine/ands Protection Act eN.J.S.A 13:18A-1 et seq.) and shown on Plate 1 of the

"Comprehensive Management Plan" adopted by the New Jersey Pinelands

Commission in November 1980.

"PL" means the general surface water classification applied to Pinelands Waters.

"Primary contact recreation" means recreational activities that involve significant

ingestion risks and inclUdes, but is not limited to, wading, swimming, diving, SUrfing,

and water skiing.

"Public hearing" means a legislative type hearing before a representative or

representatives of the Department providing the opportunity for public comment, but

does not include cross-examination.

"River mile" or "R.M. II means the distance, measured in statute miles, between two

locations on a stream, with the first location designated as mile zero. Mile zero for the

Delaware River is located at the intersection of the center line of the navigation channel

and a line between the Cape May Light, New Jersey, and the tip of Cape Henlopen,

Delaware.

"Saline waters" means waters having salinities generally greater than 3.5 parts per

thousand at mean high tide.

"SC" means the general sUrfa,C8water classification applied to coastal saline waters.

,

"SE" means the general surface water classification applied to saline waters of

estuaries.

"Secondary contad recreation" means recreational activities where the probability of

water ingestion ;s minimal and includes, but is not limited to, boating and fishing.

"Shellfish" means those mollusks commonly known as clams, oysters, or mussels.

"Shellfish waters" means waters classified as Approved, Seasonally Approved, Special

Restricted, Seasonally Special Restricted or Condemned that support or possess the

potential to support shellfish which are within the Coastal Area Facility Review Act

(C.A.F.R.A) zone as delineated in 1973, (exclUding: 1 - The Cohansey River upstream

-/- f·&j

TIERRA-A-017756-
1. Maintenance, migration and propagation of the natural and established

biota;

2. Primary and secondary contact recreation;

3. Industrial and agricultural water supply;

4. Public potable water supply after such treatment as required by law or

regulation; and

5. Any other reasonable uses.

(d) In a/l SE1 waters the designated uses are:

1. Shellfish harvesting in accordance with N.J.AC. 7:12;

2. Maintenance, migration and propagation of the natural and established

biota;

3. Primary and secondary contad recreation; and

4. Any other reasonable uses.

(e) In all SE2 waters the designated uses are:

1. Maintenance, migration and propagation of the natural and established

biota;

2. Migration of diadromous fish;

3. Maintenance of wildlife;

4. Secondary contad recreation; and

5. Any other reasonable uses.

(f) In all SE3 waters the designated uses are:

1. Secondary contact recreation;

2. Maintenance and migration of fish populations;

3. Migration of diadramaus fish;

4. Maintenance of wildlife; and

-.-zS- r·_5'_

TIERRA-A-017757
5. Any other reasonable uses.

(g) In all SC waters the designated uses are:

1. Shellfish harvesting in accordance with N.J.AC. 7:12;

2. Primary and secondary contact recreation;

3. Maintenance. migration and propagation of the natural and established

biota; and

4. Any other reasonable uses.

7:9S-1.13 Designated uses of malnstem Delaware Rlver and Delaware Bay ac set

forth In the "Delaware RIver Basin Commission, dmlnlstrative

Manual· Part III Water Quality Regulations,· rtJcle 3, dated May 22,

1991 Including all amendments and future supplements thereto.

(a) The designated uses for the mainstem Delaware River and Delaware Bay are

those contained in "Delaware River Basin Commission, Water Quality

Regulations, Administrative Manual- Part III,"Article 3. dated May 22.1991,

including all amendments and future supplements thereto.

(b) The designated uses for other waters under the jurisdiction of the DRBC are as

.set forth at N.J.AC. 7:98-1.15(d).

7:98 ..1.14 Surface water quality criteria

(a) Surface water quality criteria for FW1 waters shall be maintained as to quality in

their natural state.

I

(b) Surface water quality criteria for PL waters are as follows:

1. These waters shall be maintained as to quality in their existing state or that

quality necessary to attain or proted the designated uses, 'Nhichever is

more stringent

i. For Nitrate-Nitrogen a level of 2 mgll shall be maintained in the

surface waters unless it is shown that a lower level must be

maintained to protect the existing surface water quality.

ii. A pH level between 3.5 and 5.5 shall be maintained unless it is

demonstrated that a pH level outside of that range is necessary to

protect the existing! designated uses.

TIERRA-A-017758
5. To find unnamed waterv.tays or waterbodies or named waterways or waterbodies

which do not appear in the listing. use the following instructions:

i. Unnamed or unlisted freshwater streams that flow into streams classified as

FW2-TP, FW2-TM, or FW2·NT take the classification of the classified

stream they enter, unless the unlisted stream is a PL water which is covered

in (b)5vii below. If the stream could be a C1 water, see (b)5vi below.

"" ii. All freshwater lakes, ponds and reservoirs that are five or more acres in

surface area, that are not located entirely within the Pinelands Area

boundaries (see (b)Svii below) and that are not specifically fisted as FW2-TP

or FW2-TM are classified as FW2·NT. This includes lakes, ponds and

reservoirs on segments of streams which are classified as FW2-TM or FW2-

TP such as Saxton Lake on the Musconetcong River. If the waterbody could

be a C1 water, also check (b)5vi below.

iii. All freshwater lakes, ponds. and reservoirs, that are less than five acres in

surface area. upstream of and contiguous with FW2-TP or FW2-TM

streams, and which are not located entirely within the Pinelands Area

boundaries (see(b)5vii below) are classified as F'N2-TM. All other

freshwater lakes, ponds and reservoirs that are not otherwise classified in

this subsection or the following Tables are classified as FW2-NT. If the

waterbody could be a C1 water, also check (b)5vi below.

iv. Unnamed or unlisted streams that enter FW2 lakes, ponds and reservoirs

take the classification of either the listed tributary stream flowing into the

lake with the highest classification or the listed tributary stream leaving the

lake with the highest classification, whichever has the highest classification,

or, if there are no listed tributary or outlet streams to the lake, the first listed

stream downstream of the lake. If the stream is located within the

boundaries of the Pinelands Area, see (b)5.vii. below; if it could be a C1

water, also see (b}5vi below.

v. Unnamed or unlisted saline waterways and waterbodies are classified as

SE1 in the Atlantic Coastal Basin. Unnamed or unlisted saline waterways

Ylhich enter SE2 or~E3 waters in the Passaic, Hackensack and New York

Harbor Complex basin are classified as SE2 unless otherwise classified

within.Table 3 in (e) below. Freshwater portions of unnamed or unlisted

streams entering SE1, SE2, or SE3 waters are classified as PJIJ2·NT. This

only applies to waters that are not PL waters (see (b)5vii below). If the

waterbody or waterway could be a C1 water, also see (b)5vi below.

vi. If the waterway or waterbody of interest flows through or is entirely located

within State parks, forests or fish and game lands, Federal wildlife refuges,

other special holdings, or is a State shellfish water as defined in this

subchapter, the Department's maps should be checked to determine if the

waterbody of interest is mapped as a C1 water. If the waterway or

waterbody does not appear on the United States Geological Survey

quadrangle that the Department used as a base map in its designation of the

----- ------.. _-- _ -;-? r·":f

TIERRA-A-017759
C1 waters, the Department will determine on a case-by-ease basis v.'hether

the waterway or waterbody should be designated as C1.

vii. All waterways or waterbodies, or portions of waterways or waterbodies, that

are located within the boundaries of the Pinelands Area established at

N.J.S.A 13:1SA-11 a are classified as PL unless they are listed as FW1

waters in Table 6 in (h) below. A tributary entering a Pl stream is classified

as PL only for those portions of the tributary that are within the Pinelands

Area. Lakes are classified as Pl only if they are located entirely within the

Pinelands Area.

6. The following 10 cfassifications are used for the sole purpose of identifying the

water quality classification of the waters listed in the Tables in (c) through (h)

below:

i. trFW1" means freshwaters wholly within Federal or State lands or special

holdings that are preserved for posterity and are not subject to manmade

wastewater discharges. .

ii. "FVV2-TP" means FVV2 Trout Production.

iii. "FVV2-TM' means F'N2 Trout Maintenance.

iv. "F'N2·NT" means FW2 Non Trout.

v. "Pl" means Pinelands Waters.

vi. "~E1"means saline estuarine waters whose designated uses are listed in

N.J.·AC. 7:9B-1.12(d).

vii. "SE2" means saline estuarine waters whose designated uses are listed in

N.J.AC. 7:98-1. 12(e).

viii."SE3" means saline estuarine waters W'hosedesignated uses are listed in

N.J.AC. 7;98-1.12(1).

ix. "SC" means the general surface water classification applied to saline coastal

waters.

x. F'IV2·NT/SE1 (or a similar designation that combines two classifications)

means a waterway in which there may be a salt waterlfresh water interface.

The exad point of demarcation between the fresh and saline waters must be

determined by salinity measurements and is that point where the salinity

reaches 3.5 parts per thousand at mean high tide. The stream is classified

as FW2·NT jn the fresh portions (salinity less than or equal to 3.5 parts per

thousand at mean high tide) and SE1 in the saline portions.

7. The following water quality designations are used in Tables 1 through 5 in (c)

through (g), respectively. below:

i. "(C1)" means Category 1 waters;

ii. "(tp)" indicates trout production in waters which are classified as FW1. This

is for infonnation only and does not affect the water quality aiteria for those

waters;

iii. "(tm)" indicates trout maintenance in waters which are classified as PL or

FW1. For FW1 waters this is for information only and does not affect the

water quality criteria for those waters.

~-

p.'ir

TIERRA-A-017760
(e) The surface water classifications in Table 3 are for waters of the

Passaic, Hackensack and New York Harbor Complex Basin:

TABLE 3

Waterbody

APSHAWA BROOK (Macopin) - Entire length

ARTHUR KILL

_ (Perth Amboy) - The Kill and its saline New Jersey

tributaries between the Outerbridge Crossing and

a line connecting Ferry Pt., Perth Amboy to

Wards Pt., Staten Island, 'New Vork

~(Elizabeth) - From an east-west line connecting

Elizabethport with Bergen Pt., Bayonne to the

Outerbridge Crossing

(Woodbridge) - All freshwater tributaries

BEAR SWAMP BROOK (Mahwah) - Entire length

BEAR SWAMP LAKE (Ringwood State Park)

BEAVER BROOK

(Meriden) - From Splitrock Reservoir Dam downstream·

to Meriden Road Bridge

(Denville) - Meriden Road Bridge to Rockaway River

TRIBUTARIES

(Meriden) - Two tributaries located approximately

three quarters of a mile southwest of Meriden

BEECH BROOK

(West Milford) - From State line downstream to

Monksville Reservoir

BELCHER CREEK (W. Milford);- Entire length

BERRYS CREEK (Secaucus) - Entire length

BLACK BROOK

(Meyersville) - Entire length, except segment described

below:.

(Great Swamp) - Segment and tributaries within

the Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge

BLUE MINE BROOK

(Wanaque) - Entire length, except segment described

below

(Norvin Green State Forest) - That portion of the stream

and any tributaries within the Norvin Green State

Forest

BRUSHWOOD POND (Ring'Nood State Park)

Classification

FW2-TP(C1)

SE2

SE3

FW2-NT

FW2-TP(C1)

FVV2-NT(C1)

F'N2-TP(C1 )

FW2-NT

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2-TM

FW2-NT

FW2-NT/SE2

FW2-NT

FW2-NT(C1)

FW2-TM

FW2-TM(C1)

FW2-TM(C1)

TIERRA-A-017761
ELIZABETH RIVER

(Elizabeth) .. Source to Broad S1. bridge, Elizabeth and

all freshwater tributaries

(Elizabeth) - Broad St. bridge to mouth

FOX BROOK (Mahwah) - Entire length

GLASMERE POND (Ringwood)

GOFFLE BROOK (Hawthorne) - Entire length

GRANNEY BROOK .. See SPRING BROOK

GRANNIS BROOK (Monis Plains) - Entire length

GREAT BROOK

(Chatham) .. Entire length, except segment described

below

(Great Swamp) .. Segment within the boundaries of the

Great Swamp National Wildlife "Refuge

GREEN BROOK

(W. Milford) - Entire length, except those segments

described below

(Hewitt State Forest) ..Those segments and tributaries

which originate and are located entirely within the

Hewitt State Forest 'boundaries

GREEN POND (Rockaway)

GREEN POND BROOK

(Picatinny Arsenal) - Green Pond outlet to, but not

including, Picatinny Lake

(Wharton) - Outlet of Picatinny Lake to the confluence

with the Rt;lcKaway River

GREENWOOD LAKE (W. Milford)

HACKENSACK RIVER

(Oradell) - Source to Oradell dam

(Oradell) ..Main stem and saline tributaries from

Oradell dam to tbe confluence with Overpeck

Creek '

(Little Ferry) - Main stem and saline tributaries from

Overpeck Creek to Route 1 and 9 crossing

~ (Kearny Point) - Main stem downstream from Route 1

and 9 aossing

TRIBUTARIES·

(Oradelf) ..Tributaries joining the main stem between

Oradell dam and the confluence with Overpeck

Creek

(Little Ferry) - Tributaries joining the main stem

downstream of Ov~rpeck Creek

HANKS POND (Clinton) - Pond and a/l tributaries

HARMONY BROOK (Brookside) - Entire length

HARRISONS BROOK (Bernards) - Entire length

FW2-NT

SE3

FW2-NT

FW2-NT(C1)

FVV2-NT

F'N2-NT

FW2-NT

FW2-NT(C1)

FVV2-TP(C 1)

F'N1(tp)

F'N2-TM

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2-NT

FW2-TM

FW2-NT

SE1

SE2

SE3

FVV2-NT/SE1

FW2-NT/SE2

FW1

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2-NT

TIERRA-A-017762
HAVEMEYER BROOK (Mahwah) ~Entire length

HEWITT BROOK (W. Milford) - Entire length

HIBERNIA BROOK

(Marcella) - Source to first Green Pond Road bridge

downstream of Lake Emma

(Hibemia) ~ First Green Pond Road bridge to confluence

with Beaver Brook

TRIBUTARY

(Lake Ames) - Source to, but not including, Lake Ames

HIGH MOUNTAIN BROOK (Ringwood) - Source to, but not

including, Skyline lake

HOHOKUS BROOK (Hohokus) ~ Entire length

HUDSON RIVER

(Rockleigh) ~ River and saline portions of New Jersey

tributaries from the New Jersey~New York

boundary line in the north to its confluence with

the Harlem River, New York

.-.,.(Englewood Cliffs) ~River and saline portions of New

Jersey tributaries from the confluence with the

Harlem River, New Yori< to a north-south line

connecting Constable Hook (Bayonne) to St.

George (Staten island, New York)

TRIBUTARIES

(Rockleigh) ~Freshwater portions of tributaries to the

Hudson River in New Jersey

INDIAN GROVE BROOK (Bemardsville) ~Entire length

JACKSON BROOK

(Mine Hill) ~Source to the boundary of Hurd Park, Dover

(Dover) - Hurd Park to Rockaway River

JENNINGS CREEK (W. Milford) - State line to Wanaque River

JERSEY CITY RESERVOIR (Boonton)

KANOUSE BROOK (Newfoun.dland) - Entire length

KIKEOUT BROOK (Butler) - ~ntire length

KilL VAN KULL (Bayonne) - Westerly from a north-south line

connecting Constable Hook (Bayonne) to St.

George (Staten Island, New York)

LAKE RICKONDA OUTLET STREAM (Monks) ~That segment

of the outlet stream from Lake Rickonda within

Ringwood State Park

LAKE STOCKHOLM BROOK

(Stockholm) - Entire length, except tributaries described

separately below

(Stockholm) - Portion of westerly tributary, from its

~"\. "I:;

/' -)* -

~.1/

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2~TP(C1)

FW2~TP(C1)

FW2-TM

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2~NT/SE2

SE1

SE2

FW2~NT

F'Iv'2-TP(C1)

FW2~TP(C1)

FW2-NT

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2-TM

FW2-TP(C1")

FW2-NT

SE3

FW2~TM(C1)

FW2-TP(C1)

FW1(tp)

TIERRA-A-017763-
origins to about 1000 feet south of the Route 23

bridge, loeated entirely within the boundaries of

the Newark watershed

(Stockholm) .. Brook between Hamburg Tumpike and

Vernon-Stockholm Rd. to its confluence with Lake

Stockholm Brook, north of Rt. 23

LITTLE POND BROOK (Oakland) - Entire length

LOANTAKA BROOK

{Green Village} .. Entire length, except segment

described below

(Great Swamp) .. Brook and all tributaries within the

boundaries of Great Swamp National Wildlife

Refuge

LUD·DAY BROOK (Camp Garfield) .. Source dOYmstream to its

confluence with the southwestern outlet stream

from Clinton Reseveir just upstream of the

confluence of the outlet stream and a tributary

from Camp Garfield

MACOPIN RNER

(Newfoundland) .. Source to Echo Lake dam

(Newfoundland) .. Echo Lake dam to Pequannock River

MEADOW BROOK (Wanaque) .. Skyline Lake to Wanaque

River

MILL BROOK

{Randolph} .. Source to Rl 10 bridge

(Randolph) - Rt. 10 bridge to Rockaway River

MONKSVILLE RESERVOIR (Long Pond Iron Works

State Park)

MORSES CREEK (Linden) .. Entire length

MOSSMANS BROOK (West Mifford) - Source to confluence

with Clinton Reservoir

MT. TABOR BROOK (Morris Prains) - Entire length

.:,. NEWARK BAY (Newark) • North of an east-west fine connecting

Efizabethport with Bergen Pt., Bayonne up to the

mouths of the Passaic and Hackensack Rivers

NOSENZO POND (Upper Macopin)

OAK RIDGE RESERVOIR (Oak Ridge)

OAK RIDGE RESERVOIR (Oak Ridge) - Northwestem

tributary to Reservoir

OHIO BROOK (Morris Township) .. Source dOYmstream

to Morristown town line

OVERPECK CREEK (Palisades Parl<) - Entire length

PACACK BROOK

(Canistear) - Brook and tributaries upstream of

FW1(tp)

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2·NT

FW2-NT(C1)

FW1

F'IV2-NT

FW2-TM

FW2-NT

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2-NT

FW2-TM(C1)

F'N2-NT/SE3

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2-NT

SE3

FW2-NT(C1)

F\N2-TM

FW1(tm)

F\N2·TM

FW'2-NT/SE2

FW1

TIERRA-A-017764
Canistear Reservoir located entirely within the

boundaries of the Newark Watershed

(Stockholm) - Outlet of Canistear Reservoir to

Pequannock River

PASSAIC RIVER

(Mendham) - Source to Interstate 287 bridge, except

tributaries described separately below

(Paterson) - Interstate 287 bridge to Dundee Lake dam

'tUttle Falls) - Dundee Lake dam to confluence with

Second River

--if> (Newark) - Confluence with Second River to mouth

TRIBUTARIES .

(Great Piece Meadows State Park) - Tributaries within

Great Piece Meadows State Park

PECKMAN RIVER (Verona) - Entire. length

PEQUANNOCK RIVER

MAIN STEM

(Vernon) - Source to confluence with Pacack Brook

(Hardyston) - Pacack Brook to, but not including,

Macopin Reservoir or the tributaries described

separately below

(Kinnelon) - Macopin Reservoir outlet to Hamburg

Turnpike bridge in Pompton Lakes Borough

(Riverdale) - Hamburg Turnpike bridge in Pompton

Lakes Borough to confluence with Wanaque

River

(Pompton Plains) - Confluence with Wanaque River

downstream to confluence with Pompton River

TRIBUTARIES

(Copperas Mtn.) - Entire length

(Smoke Rise) - Entire length

(Green Pond Jundiop) - Tributary at Green Pond

Jundion from its origin downstream to Route 23

(Jefferson) - Tributary joining the main stem about

3500± feet southeast of the Sussex-Passaic

County line, near Jefferson from its origin to

about 2000 feet upstream of the pond

{Lake Kampfe} - Source to, but not including,

Lake Kampfe

(Lake Karnpfe) - Lake Kampfe to Pequannock River,

except tributary described separately below

(Lake Kampfe) - Tributary within the boundaries of

Norvin Green State Forest, originating west of

Tome Mtn.

PILES CREEK (Grasselli) - Entire length

FW2-NT

FW2-TP(C1 )

FW2-NT

FW2-NT/SE2

SE3

FW2-NT(C1)

FW2-NT

FW1(tp)

FW2-TM

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2-TM

FW2-TP(C1)

FW2-TP(C1)

FW1(tm)

FW1(tm)

FW2-TM

FW2-NT

FW2-NT(C1)

SE3

-- ---- --- ----

TIERRA-A-017765
-,I.

REFERENCE NO. 16

.~.:~ ,_.- .

" !'". >,,,;.~

'~'"".."

- .~,'.

'", ~-.:

~._i i:", .

TIERRA-A-017766
..."

I--

New York State Department or Environmental Conservation

WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS

SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER

CLASSIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS

New York State

Codes, Rules and Regulations

Tille 6, Chapter X

Parts 700·705

I

I.I . TIERRA-A-017767
"

CHAPTER X DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES § 700.1

PART 700

DEFINITIONS. SAMPLES AND TESTS

(Statutory authority: Environmental Conservallon La ......§§ 3-0301(2) fm J,

IIl·0313, 17·0301, 17·0303. 17.080111

•• 4,.1,

700.3 Test> Or analyUcal melhod.

700,. Severablllly

Historical Note

ParI repealed. new (§§ 700.1·700.2) filed: Aprll 28. 1972; Feb. 2!l. 1974: repealed. ne'"

(n700.1·700 .• 1 tiled Aug, 2. 1991 eft. 30 day> aner flUng

700.1 Ooflnlllon.

700.2 ~lIecUon or samples

Section 700.1 Definitions. (a) The terms. words. or phrases used In Parts 700·

705 or this TItle shall have the meanings described below.

(1) Acule loxic effecl means an effect that usually occurs shortly arter the admlIl.

IstraUon of either a s1ngle dose or multiple doses of a chemical.

(2) Admini.strator means the Adm1n1strator of the Untted States Environmental

Protectlon Agency.

(3) Approved lreatmenl as applied to water supplles means treatment accepted

as sallsfactory by the authorities responsible for exercls1ng supervision over the Qual.

Ity of water supplies.

(t> Be31 u.!age3 as specified for each class of water means those uses as deter.

mined by the commissIoner 1n accordance wIth the consIderations prescribed by the

EnVironmental Conservation Law.

(5) Chronic toxic effect means an effect that Is irreversible or progressive or oc.

curs because the rate of Injury Is greater than the rate ot repair durin!, prolonged

exposure to a chemical.

(6) Coastal waters mean those marine waters w!thin the territorial limHs of the

State other than estuaries and enclosed bays, Long Island Sound is deSignated as

coastal waters for the purposes of thermal discharges.

(7) Commis"ioner means the Commissioner ot the Department ot Environmental

Conservation.

(8) Consolida.led rock or bedrock means the compact or solld hard rock beneath

or exposed at the surface of the earth or overlain by surface waters.

(9) Deparlment means the New York State Department at Environmental Con.

servatlon.

(10) Di.spo"al 3ystem means a system tor dlspos1ng Of sewage. industrIal waste or

other wastes. 1ncludlng sewer systems and treatment works.

(11) Efflu.ent limitatio"" mean any restrictiOn on Quantltles. qualltles. rates and

cOncentrations ot chemical. physical. biological. and other constltuents ot effluents

that are discharged 1nto or allowed to run from an outlet or point source or any other

dIscharge wlth1n the meanIng of sectlon 17·0G01 of the EnvIronmental Conservation

Law 1nto surface waters, groundwater or unsaturated zones.

(12) Enclo"ed bay" mean those marine waters within the territorial limits of New

York State, other than coastal waters or estuaries, In whIch exchange of sea water Is

severely Ilmlted by barrier beaches. For the purpose of thermal d19charges. the following are deSignated as enclosed bays: Jamaica Bay. Hempstead Bay, Great South

Bay. Moriches Bay, Sh1nnecock Bay and Meeox Bay.

391 CN 8-31.91

TIERRA-A-017768
ITIII': 11 1':t/V!I("rlt.ll·:rITAI. ('t'N:n,:ItVATI'111

1h I Th.'", w,","~" ':hall (·""t:tI" "" !I"aU,,/: ""lid •. sptll"Olh],' sulld •. 011. ,I"d,:" d.,]" ...

It"i, lu:'<lI: wa~t~·s. r1...1,·h·rlO1L'1 ~nb'.laJl(,"'!i. ("olon-d llr nlht'r wa~;If'.'i or h~'al"tl l'lpllds ilt.

Irlhlltahl.-. 111 !H·wal~~'. Il1dtl~lrlal wa=,'I!'~ or nlh.'r wi\~lp~.

Ir, TIH'co' shall ,.•, "0 'hsrh:trr," "I' dlspo.al 01 sew:-.,.e, 1r1.lu~"lrlal wasl"" 0,' "Iher

wa:;.tr~ Into 1he.....- w .. ,...,..:

1<11 1'1"",,· wa'pl': '''.,11.', "lalll no pho~"h"rll' an,l "Ilro.:cnln :1I"OIlIlI'lh .. 1 "'II'

III r.rowlhs 01 Oll h,,,· w('ed, "'"l ,llrnl'. Ihal will Imp"lr Ihl' wall" ~ for theIr h",1 "'al:".'

11I.lorl ..1l1 Nol.·

Spc_ J,nlll t:1t . Muy 2ft, 10'11: rt"p't!alcf1. n-.:w flied: ;'I'tiI18. 1'97:l: I-'d.-, ~~. Un" ., .11'''1

701~1.'.'H'W '11.·' h,ly 1 Ink~: "·poal ••' n,.·y flied .',,~. 2. 19!11 oll.:W lIay" ,,11,1' III1"g.

701.4 Ch,,, .. A~~IH'l'lnl (.l·S, I.. ,.h ." ..Inro w:lI,'r., lOll The he!'t lI.aces 01 Class

II ~ wat.·,·" '"'(" a~. "~l' or w'\I ..,· supplv ror "rlnklny,. CUlinary or 10011pru('I'!ISI11g1''''''

'''''''~: 11I'ltllnl~y a,," "rrOlIlI"ry ('nntad re .....'allon; unll IIMhln/:,. The wal"I" shall I",

•"LLnht~ rOI fish 1'1"I,.ll:allnll II"" ';urvlval.

Ill) Thl:; d'I:I"II~" ..t1.. " "'''}' I.., ,:Iv,'" I" Ih"s., 1"1.·,.",,llIlOal hOllnrll\ry wnl.'rs lh"'. II

suIJJ.~~lcd Ifl appnl\'l'd lI-ealnH"ul. ('qllat to C"f1aJ:lIlallnn. scdimeulillinn. rlilralion alld

"lslnlcclIo" will. a 01 Ii 11""a I I "l'a I ""',,1. if n"r"s~:\I'Y. 10 r",llIce nalur;1Ily pn'sc nl Inll' r

11Ics. lOrd 0" will In,'rl N"w Yn,.k Slall' D"I""·,,,, ..,,I OfI ",allh drink In/-:wal"r slal"I",.,1'I

and ar.., or will hI' ron.'dere,1 !'ale an,t sallslarl",.y lor ,Irlnklny, wal('r 11IIrl''''CM.

11l..""Ic'I,1 Nol"

S"r: 1·'lwIIlI·d, H~'W flll-.1 AprH 2A, W12: "~I'I" 2li, lUll. itnllt. '1I1~1' H ••pl. ~u. IOli,

n'nUIH 10. In, IU,'W '"'~I•.Jllly ~. PIX:':! n·p'~HI(".I. ;H'W fll,'.1 ""10;.2. IOUI err. :10 I'ny~nf1cl'"

rlllnl:

701.5 Cll\s" ,\.\ Ir"s" ,"rr .."o w .. l"rll. (al The be.1 IIsages 01 Cln .. AA walers

are' a SOllrr:., of waleI' Sllpply for drinking. c\lllnary or lood proce.slng purpos"s; 1'1'1 ~

mary allel s""o'Hlary rnnlacl rerr'callon; and IIshlng. The walers shatl he sllll"hie lor

IIsh I'rnpa!;aU,," al1l1 survival.

(hI This clo9Slllcatlon may be given 10 lho.e walers that, If subjecled to approved

.IlIsllll"dloll Irea Im"n\, \\Illh additional treolment I( nl'cessnry 10 remov" naturnlly (Ir('s~

cnllrnplll'lIh's. mel't or will mecl N,'w York Slule De(llLrlmf!nl n( "callh lIrlnkl,,!; waleI'

slanrlards anti ate or will he conshlered sale and snUslaclory lor drinking wat"r pur.

pose.~

IIls10rl«' ..1 NlIlo

S"'" I~"I..,..I",I. 111,·.1Mur"h 2n. 1007;"0'" 111",1~-"l>. ~:I.1071;mmd.rile'" Sept. 20, 1071;

r"num 701~20.n"w rued July 3, 19B3; r"J'I"al.d. ""w riled Aug. 2. IUUI"fl. 30 days all ...

ttllng.

701.6 CIIl". A Ite!h surface walen. (a, The best unges of Class A walers are:

a .ollrce o( waler .upply (or drinking, culinary or food processing purposes; primary

and secondary contnct recreation; ond fishing. The walen .hall be sullable lor fish

propagnllon nnd survival.

(bl Thl9 cla.slflcatlon may be given 10 Ih0ge waleI" lhal, If subjected to approvf!d

Irealment e'lunl to coagulation, sedimentation, Illtratlon ond disinfection, wllh addl.

tlonnl trealrnf!nt If necl'ssary to reduce naturally presenlimpurllies. meet or will meet

New York Stnte Depnrtment 01 lIealth drinking water slandards and ore or will be

considered sale and satisfactory for drinkIng waler purpo.es.

IlIslorleal Note

!-I"o.rIIn,lJuly 3, 108:1:.."pomlod,n"w flied Aug.

2. 1'01 orr. 30 day. alt"r IIl1ng.

3911 CN 3·31.92

('lI,\1'TI':ll X IlIVI:;IIIN 01" WATErl 1tI':~OllIlCI':~ § 70 I.13

701.7 ('Ill •• 1\ In,.h ."rllteo \\'.. I"r •. The h,,~1 II':\I:"S ", ('1;\'9 1\ w"t"r. III''' prl~

lIIary an,1 s" ..nnllary ""iliad ..ecrenllon and IIshlng. Thes" ",aIel'S shall be slIlIahle lor

IIsh propar,Oltion and sllrvlval.

Hlslorlr .. 1 Nole

!>ee.1II",1 July J. 19R~: r"peml"cl.0"," 111"11 Au~

2. lotH oU. 30 dnys nil", IIIL,,!:,.

701.8 Cln88 C Ir,,~" surface wators. The h('st usage 01 Class C watl'rs I. f1shlnr..

Thl'sC walers !Ihall be snltable lor IIsh propa!;allon llnd survival. The wall'r 'l\mllly shall

he slIltable (or primary and secondary contact recreation, although other facIoI" may

tlmlt the use lor these purpose •.

IIIstorleal Nolo

Soe. lIIed July 3, IOR3; r"pel'llod, n"w 1II",1 Allg.

2. 1991 "U. 30day. An ... IIl1ng~

701.9 (;1""8 f) It""" !furl"ce wlttorll. The be'll IIsage 01 Cla.s n walers I. n"hlng .

Illle I" ""eh 00111..... conditions as ]ntl'rmllll'ney of 1I0w. \\101,,1'con,lIllon. not eOl1l11lcive

to pl'opal:nllon of l:nlOo IIshery, or slreorn he 'I con<l'lIo09, Ih(' \\/ol('rs will nol ,uppllrl ''''11 propnr,nllno, Th""e wal('rs shnll be suitable lor IIsh "llrvlvlIl The wnte .. 'lflallly

';hall he sllll"hle lor primary and secondary conlncl rl'c ..eltllon. allhollgh olh"r laclors

lOay limit lhe use lur the'le purposes.

Hlstorlral Nolo

~.~e. fllml J'I~Y 3, tIiRr.: n·T)(·I\h~11.fWW fll,·.1 AUI:.

2. 19111"rr. 30 ,1"y. ,,11,,1'IIlLn!,:

~AI.JNF: SUIlFA(;l': W,\TI':It!i

-7> 701.10 CIR~s 8/\ 81\IIno surfol'l'J wl\ten •. The best usa!;es or Clas. ;;/\ wnters are

sh('lIl1shtng lor markel purposes, prImary anti secon,1ary contart recreallon an<l Ilshlllg.

These walers shall be suitable for fish propagallon and survIval

III.lnr"'l\l Note

!>ec.lIIod July 3, 19R~; r.p"al"d. 0"," 111.,1-'''I:

2, 1091"rl. 30days an"r 1I11ng.

-7" 701.11 elllss sn Nllllne surface walers. The besl us:\I:I's 01 CI"ss SB waIN' a rp

primary aod .econdary contact recreallon and tlshlng. These wllter9 .hall be sullabll'

lor IIsh propagation and survival.

IIIRlor", .. 1 Nnln

Seo. lIIod JUly 3, 1886; repoar"d. ,,"w 111".1A"g.

2, III!!I elt. 30day.. afler Illlng. !

701.12 Class SC saline surface walers. The best u.agl! or Class SC walers Is IIsh~

Ing. These walers shall be suitable for rtsh propagallon and survIval. The wall'll' quality

shall be suitable for prImary and secondary contact recreation. although other factors

may limit Ihe use for these purposes.

IIlslorlel\l Noto

Sec. lIIed July 3.198:1; r"peal"d. ne," f11~11-'u/:

2, 19111 err. 30 d..y... lIer IIIlng.

~ 701.13 Cia .." J .. nlln" surface waler •. The hc.t'J"ar,('s 01 Cla,,'1 I waiNs III'''' 'IN'.

ondary conlacl recreation an<J fishing. These walers 9hall he sullable ror IIsh 1'1""1"'1:"

lion ond survival.

III ..lorleal Nol"

~'Cc_ rllcd July 3. 19'1:); repealed, new IIlr!' AII~.

2. 1091dl. 30 day. aller IlIlo!:,

TIERRA-A-017769 , . or, n., ~ c. t
§ 70 l.. C1IAPTI':H X DIVISION OJ!" WATfo:fl lUr.soUnCF::s § 702.2

....,. 70 1.14 Ch,~~ 110 snll",~ sllrla«'o '71\1,.,r". The best IIsag!! 01 Class SD waters Is rlo>l1.

lng. These waters $hall he sllllahle lor fish sllrvlval. ThIs classlClcallon mny be given to

"Ulse waters that, llecallse 01 nalllral or mnn·made condillons, caonol mccllhe rcqllin"

menls lor prImary and secondnry contact ..-ecreatlon and fish propllgallon.

IIlstorlel\l Nnte

5" ... ru",1 .llIly 3, IUR:!;r~p""II!d. "I!Wru",1 AliI!.

2. IUI/I<!fl.MI .IIlYI AII"r IIIlnl:. gee.

102.1 Oa.l. for dlrlvatlon of watlr quality

.tandarda and IUId&neevaluee

Slandarlb and fUldance vllu .. lor pro.

tectlon of human health and _re .. of

polable waler luppllee

Proeedur .. lor dertvln, llandard. and

,uldanee valu .. ba .. d on Specific

MCLe and principal or,anlc conlaml·

nanlel .....

Proeedura. for dertvln, llandard. and

IUldance valuel ba .. d on onco,enlc

ellecla

I'ro".dures lor d.rlvlne .ll1ndard. anll

,uldan"e viluea bl.~d on nononco·

,enie ellecLa

Procedure lor derlvln, slandards and

euldanCi valuel band on aulh~lIc

con.lderallon.

Procedure lor derlvlne .lllndard. and

guidance vlll"e. bu.ed on chemlcl11

correlallon

Procedure. for derlvlnc .tandard. and

culdance values lor prolecUon 01 hu·

man heallh from "onaumpllon olll.h

Siandard. and IUldanel valu •• lor pro·

lecllon of aquaUe 1If.

PART 702

OERIVATION AND USE OF STANDARDS AND GUU>ANCE VALUES

(SlatulOry aulhorlly: Envlronmenlal Conservation Law, §§ S-03Ol(2I1ml.

15·0313. 17·0301. 11-0303. 17·0809)

S.c.

702.10 Pro"edure. lor derlvlne Ilandardl and

euldance valu.. for netl propacaUon

and wrvlval

702.11 Proceduree tor derlvlnc .tandard. and

IUldance valu .. for lI.h IUrvlval

702.12 Procedure. for dlrlYln, llandlrd. and

ruldance value. baaed on lelntln, ot

aquaUc lood

102.1S Procedure. tor derlvln, .landard. and

Culdance valull to prolld wlldllfa

coneumere o~n.h

102.14 Procedure for i"erlYln, .landard. and

,uldnnc. vllu •• ba.ed on chemical

correlation.

102.11 Oe..-Ivallon01 IUld.nce valu..

702.11 Derivation Ind Implementallon at d·

nuent limitation.

102.17 Variances lor ellluenl IImllallons bu~r1

on a'1uatlc .Inndarrls Drguldan". VII·

un

702.18 Mor •• Irln,enl erollndwa'.r diluent

.'andan" or IImltallon.

102.1a Modlll"atlons 01 ,roundwller eflluenl

Il&ndard. or IImltallon.

702.20 8tudl .. and monllorlne lor dl.cher,n to

groundwater

702.21 Ellcepllon. 10 groundw.'~r elnllenl 11m.

1!.Dllons

70222 Sevuablllly

1115torlcal Note

Part repe.led, new /lied: April 211.1912;Feb. 25. Ult; rep"al~d. n~w !§§ 702.1·702.22.

lIled Aug. 2, IU9lell. 30 days Iller riling.

GROUNOWATF.RS

701.15 Cia" .. 0/\ '''-('l"h Itrnuntlwalors. The besl usnge of Clus GA wDlers Is ns a

source of potable waler supply. Class GA walers are fresh croundwaters.

lII.torten' Note

Sec:.m.d July!. U18ll; repealed, new med Au,.

~. 11/111 ort. :Ill day8 .lter IIIlne.

102.2

102.!

701.16 C).lIS GilA saline (1'oundw.ten. The beal usages of Class GSA waters are

I\S a snurec nl IKllnhlo mlnC!rnl walen. for con vcrs Inn to fresh polnbhl walen, or ns rnw

mlllerlill fur the mllnllflu~luru of anrllllm ~hlnrhlo or Ita derlvAtlvC!S or almllnr 1... 01111"111.

Class GSA waters are saline groundwaten.

IIlstor-lcld Note

9~ ... III.d Jllly S, lallS; r.pcaled. new tIIerlAll',

2. IOUI ell. 110day. aller IllIng.

102.•

702.5

102.1

701.17 CII\"" OS" "nllnn I:rollndwlltnn. The he"l uSlllte or Chlss G!':IJ wnlors I" II!

n receiving wnler lor d",pollnl or wnstes. CIII". G!lll wlIlon lire ;mllnc groumlwlIl"rll Ihlll

hRve IS eh10rhlo concenlrnllon In excess or 1,000 m1lllgram3 per Iller or 0. lolnl dl9Solve.1

solids concenlrallon In excess 01 2,000 milligrams per Iller.

Ilistorieal Note

Sec. /lied July 3. 1985;r~pealed. new lIIed Au,.

2, 1991eff. 30 days after IIl1ng.

102.7

1028

102.a

701.18 AS!llgnrnent nf J:"l"OlIndwater cla!l!llllealions. (a I The groundwale..- elas.

sillcallon!l cletlned In see lions 70t.l!1 Ihrough 701.16 01 Ihls Part are assigned lo all lhe

~roundwnlers 01 New York Stnle.

(bl The Class GSIJ shall nol he assigned to any groundwalers of Ihe Slale, \lIll"ss Ihe

commissIoner IInds Ihnl adjacent and Irlblltnry groundwalers and lhe best US:lI:c!I

Ihereol will nol be 100pnlrel' hy such clns!llflrnllol1.

III!ltnrh-1l1 Noto

Sec. a,ld .." by renllm 701.3, lII..d July 3, 108~;'~peal~d. new llIed Aug. 2, 1001ell. 30

dny. aller filing.

Section 702.1 n'nls tor dorlvallnn of wRUlr (1lIRllty "t"n.h,rtlH I,od gulrlnnrn \'" •.

uos. (a) The control 01 taste-, color- and odor-producing, loxlc and olher delell'rlou.'l

substances Is Implemented through Ihe use 01 slandards amI ~Idance values. Slandanh

and guIdance values tor such lIubstances Shall be derived according lo Ihe procedures

701.19 Sovorfthlilly. "any provision 01 thl. Parlor Its appllcallon 10 "ny person set forth In thts Part.

or clrcumstnnee Is held 10 be Invalid. the remainder 01 thIs Part and lhe appllcallon or

thal provisIon 10 olher persons or clr-cum"lancell will nol be alfecled.

lilstorlrlli Noto

R~c. n~'clf'!rl hy remJln. Rflff.unuJ, 701,4. IIIp.d July 3, IDR~: amd. riled s,P.-pl. :m. 19Rn;

repenle,l. Ilew lIIerl AliI:. 2. 1001~!I. 30 days "/ler IIl1ng.

(b) The derlvatlon or standards and guidance vallles will consIder. 10 lhl' exlenl

pos~lble, varIations In nalural or bllckground condilions or walers. InclucUng but not

IImllerllo alkalinity, temperalure, hnrllness nml I'll.

1118torlcal Note

Sec. Tepealed, new flied: April 28, t072; F~b. 25, 19H: amds. tI1~d: ~.pl. 20, 19H.

July S. 10811;r~p"eI6r!. new lII.d Aug. 2. 1001~Ir, SO d"y •• n., filing.

701.20

Historical Noto

See. nelde" by tenum. 701.8, lIIed July 3, lOllS;amd. lIl.d S~pl. 20. (URn;repelll"d.

lIIed AuI':.2, 19UIerl. 30 dny. I1n~r riling. 702.2 Slllndards IInll guidance Vftlll08 lor protection nf human henlth nn,1 """rr,,~

01 polnhle water .uppllo". (n) Slnndllrds nnd guldnnc" vnlues fDr prDledlnn "r Il,,·

bost uRage liS a 80llrce 01 pn!nllic wnler lIupply shnll protr.cl human henlth an,l ,I,I"l<ltlf:

waler sources and are referred !o as health (water source) values.

100 CN 8·31-91 TIERRA-A-017770
REFERENCE NO. 17

TIERRA-A-017771
" .. -., ",.'

-:-:.,._- ··7"'"·.-:-:-~~~"7·.-...-----,--,-------- -'" --_.,

'-_~._, C'. ..... : .. _' ::....;..•• _. '_" _~~.;

--..•_--~_.,-.-----

-.-.-:.-·_-t'· ~_.~... ,

--.--

",;,,_ .._.-~,...........--_-,.~~-

.._ ......._---"..._ ..- ..-......_--

.... _ .._.----...-~----'-

'.-.....-- ~~_.--"~--:;.

'" .. _.' -:: ~-'.'-'-

'lo •••. :

. "

......- ... _;,. ....~_.,

." .... '.. "

...... ~ __ a _ __ .. _~ •• -._-::-:,":_

.. -~.,....... -.',--_ ....._- " _ ..

'-'

.-

•

STATE OF NEW YORK

OFFICIAL COMPILATION

OF

CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS

GEORGE E. PAT AKl

Governor

A.1.£xM.,"DER F. TREAD\\o'ELL

Secretary of State

Published by

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

162 Washington Avenue

Albany, New York 12231

1/1/95

•

.... .

~ -~ ~.r' ~~:_-.,::-,,~ ~:~-:';~::':-;' •. ;~~:.?~..,£.-:~~~~:.o-~_-w.~_~..,-:_..'_.:.....h.~._~.... ~._

.',

----:~_ .... h ....... _ ••• ~ •• : ..... ~.~~---.-.:.. ... ---.- __ "

--

TIERRA-A-017772
Title 6

Conservation

Vol. D-I

Copyright 1995 by

Secretary of Slale

Stale of New York

Printed in the United States of America

by

Lawyers Cooperative Publishing

Aqueduct Building

Rochester, New York 14694

p.2

TIERRA-A-017773
PART

Subchapter B Classes and Standards of Qualit~' and Purity Assil:necl to Fresh

Surface and Tidal Salt Waters (continued) ;;-,:;

...._ - ":'- ..~

SUBCHAPTER B

Classes and Standards of Quality and Purity Assigned to

Fresh Sl.!rface and Tidal Salt Waters (continued)

PART

VOLUME 0-1

Article 11 Mohawk River Drainage Basin Series

Article 12 Nassau County Waters

Article 13 New York City Waters Series

875

88.3

890

..

l·j·95 (ReISsued 7/951 18.01- Conserva[Jon

TIERRA-A-017774
"

-'

ARTICLE 13

New York City Waters Series

PART

890 l'e\\' York Cit.y Waters

891 Jamaica Bay Drainage Basin

PART 890

NEW YORK CITY WATERS

(Slatmory alllhonlY: Enl'lronrncnlal C(lnS~f\ JIIOI1 La". ~ 17 ·O.~OI \

See.

590 I

890.::'

890.3

890.J

890.5

890.6

S90.'

S9O.5

890.9

890.10

590.11

Adopting order

Designated waters

Definitions

Special conditions

ASSigned c1assificJtlons and st:lI1dards of qUJliI~' and punt~

Table I

:-'Iap 1

:-'Iap ::'

~IJp 3

,,1ar 4

Quadrangle map'

Historical !"ot~

Pm ame. flied June 20.1985 ere. 30 dJ\S Jrter flllI1g, Amcnded ,IJtul(lry JUlhOnl\

§ 890.1 Adopting order.

la\ ?ursu:lnt 10 :mic1l: I:! of the Public Health Law. the Water Resources Commission. ;lfle,

proper study and following. publiC he:lrin~s hl:ld on due notice. hereby adopts and a>slgm (he

follOWIng classifiC;llions and standards of qU:1lily and punty to all surf:1c" \\ :11..r, \\llhlll the

destgnated drall1agl: basins of New York Bay. Raritan B:1Y and a portion (l( the "\llanll': Ocean.

includmg Ihe subbaSIns of Arthur Kill. Kill \:In Kull. the Harlem Rl\'er ;.lI1dthe Lowe, E:l,t R ,wr

as herein:lfter dl:scribl:d.

(bl This :ldoption and assignmenl of standards of quality and pUrl(y 10 Ihe abo\'e designated

walers shall be efil:Clive December :::. 19t'rl

§ 890.2 Designated waters.

(a I The dl:signated watl:rs are within the following areas:

( 1) (he drainage basin of Nl:w York Bay bl:low the mouth of the Hudson RI ver al the soulh

tip of Manhattan Island. including Gra\'esend Bay. Coney Island Crel:k. AII:mtic Basin. Erie

Basin. Gowanus Bay. Gowanus CanaL Upper Nl:w York Bay. Lower New York Bay. The

Narrows and (he Atlantic Ocean waters. mcluding (he drainage areJ off Coney Island and lying

westerly of a north·soulh hne from Light Inll:t al the soulheJSIl:r1y lip of Coney Island

peninsula to the southwes(l:rly lip of Rock:lw:lY Point: thl:ncl: along Ihe jwy to Rock:l\\:lY Jelly

light: Ihencl: dUl: south 10 Ihe New York - ;\ew Jersey boundary line:

\ ~) the lowl:r EJst Rlvu drainage basin from the mouth to a hne Jeross the East Ri\er nOl1h

oiWards Island betwl:l:n Stony Poinlll1 Bronx County and Lawrence Point III Queens County:

and

1:-, the drainage bJsin, of Anhur Kill. Kill V:ln KLtll. the H:lrlem River and Raritan B:lY·

Ib~ The abow de,'gnJtcu \\;lI.:r, ar.: 1,'cJ!.:d as sho\\n <In ~bp I. ,.:ellon Sl,lO '7 lI,r;',;, and 3'

contamed withrn the IOpographlcal or b:lsln llmll !tne on Ihe n:proJuceu lop0gr:lphlci: re!t:r.:nce

map; sel fonh in seCllon 890.11. //Ifm. Classllicallons of pllmar: waters ar .. oul1lned on :--1:Ip 3.

section 890.9. il/fra.

1·1·9~ (ReISsued 7/951 18.399 . (onSeryaliOn

TIERRA-A-017775
~I'

-.

......

I

,

'"'h

00

:...

o

.....

..... Table I.

TAm.F.'

CLASSIFICA'tIONS AND STANDARDS OF QUAl.l'tY' AND PURITY ASSJONI!:D TO FRESH SU1Uo'ACE WATERS AND

TIDAl. SAJ.T WATERS, INCLUDING CEHTAIN TIDAl. WATERS OF THE INTER:3'"TATE SANITATION DISTRICT WtTllIN

D~:SIGNATED DRAINAGE BASINS OF Nb:W YORK nAY. RAJUTAN nAY A!'ID A PORTION OF THP: ATI..AN"ttC

OClCAN, INCLUDING 11lE SUBBASINS OF ARTHUR KILL, KILL VAN KULJ:., TIlE HARLEM RIVER AND THE

LOWER EAST RIVER. BRONX, KINGS, NEW YOllK. QUEENS, RICHMOND AND

WESTCHESTER COUN'nES. NEW YOJlK

It~'"

No.

Willen

1r04~:r:

N..... 6oo!T

~---~ ----------

•

ATLANTIC OCEAN AND NEW YORK BAY

AUanUc Ocean portJon TIlllt portion or the ocean wllhin New York Slate

opposite Rockewa)' penInsula bounded bn the weat

by a IIlte from the Up of RoclLaway Point, thence

50ulh along the Jetty to Rockaway jetty light,

Utence due eouth to the slate boWldary Une: and

bounded on the north by Ute shore ot Rockaway

penInsula rrom the western lip to lhe NMsau.

Queer1ll county Itne III East Hoclulway Inlet; and

bounded on the east by lhe Nassau.Queens county

line nlnnK P:R!llluwk"wlly Inlet, trw.nC'''lWluU,tn

tho 011110IHlllndary IIno.

AlIantic Ocean and Lower

New York Bay e8s1 portions

OeeaJl an,t bay walen within New York Slale

opP""lle Coney Island peninsula and Stnten Island

bounded on Ute west by .. north-lIOuth Une drawn

from the 9OU\h limit- 01 Fort Wadsworth M IUtary

Reeervll.llon and Pa.Blllng:lhrough Wed Dank 1I~~11to

New York·New Jenopy boundary line: ntlll bound"" on

Ih" north by a line dTawn rrom the IKlUthlhnll3 or

I

I

I.

;·t :~~.!

"f

I

uh n

CD

~

lD

0

<» ;0

t;I ><

C" "

Ii" "< ~ in

0

z.

a

"'T1

~

;po

~

rn

;0

;0

rn

Vl

a

c

;0

n

rn

Ul

1111"

R~f·

No,

et.... 8l<",,'arcl.

---- .-._--------

S-248W

3-248e

S-23.o;jO:

S·24sw

SA SA

sn SA

un

0)

to

o

m

TIERRA-A-017776
)

',>

.-,

'l.)

n

o

an

:;J

~

<5

::>

lI"m

No,

2

(COilC'dj

TABLE 1 ICQ1'\I'd)

No .....

._- -~.-----

lJ~ ..C'rlf'lO"t

._--------_._-------- ._----

Lower New York Bay weet

porOon

Fort Wl\~worth MUllary llellervoUon and extendlnJ:

lh)uthe8.lllerly to Norton Point at the welltem tip 01

Coney IlIland pentllBUla near Sea Gate. thence extendIng the lIne along eouth Bhore 01Umey llIland to Ught

Inlet at southeasterly tip or Coney llILand pen1nsulll

near Manhattan lllla~h; and bounded on east by

north'90uth line be~lnnlng at dncr1bed Ught Inlet

and exten(llng IlOUlhwaro to lIQuU!Up or noclt&way

'elly light. thence due IlOUthto New York·New Jereey

boundary line.

Thatporllon or Bay w!th1n New York Slate bounded

on eut by north·lIQuth line drawn from lIQuth IImll1J or

Fort Wad3worth MUllary He~rvatlon and paning

throu~ West Bank Ughlto New York-New Jersey

boundary llne; and bounde.j on weet by north-south

line drawn 'rom JIOutl. Up 01 Crooltes Point to Point

Comlort at Keansburg, New Jers ..y.

Nap

n·l.

No.

S-2:\se

S-2:38w

T·23nw

. T-2:lJle

Cltu ..

SB S8

un

Q)

10

o

m

r)

o

z

Vl

rn

;;0

--:

;s.

::::!

o

'/.

TIERRA-A-017777
1-J -

tI","

No_

""....

n

'J>

LI2113

Lower- New York Bay

portIon Including

Graveaend Bay

Ceney Island Cr-eek

Upper New York Bay In.

eluding The Nar-r-ow8.

AUllnUc flasln.

Gowanus Bay

TABUC r (oo,"'d)

ThaI poruon or Bay south 01 The

Narrow. and bounded on north by line

lrom tip or Fort Wadsworth 1.0 Up of

Fort HamUton; and bounded on aouth

by line from IIOUtll.l1mltll or Fort WadJI.

worth Military HnervaUon to Norton

Point at wesl"m lip 01Om"y Island

Jw.nlruula near Sea Gale. including

Gravlllend Bay.

Trlb. or Gravelumd Bay.

That poruon 01Hay WIU,ln New York

bounded on lIOulh by line lrom tip 01

P'ort Wadsworth to tip of Fort HamllIon: and bounded Onweill by shore of

StIllen bland norlh 01Up 01 Fort WaM.-

worth. thence by north-Bouth IIn"

across mouth 01 KlIJ Van I{ull from

northernmost polntol Slaten IRland to

ell.'llemmoBfpoln1 at Constable Polnl,

Bayonne. New Je.--.ey. tJ,en<:e by New

York-New JeT>ley boundary line lrom

mouth 01 Il..doon Hlver: and bounded

on north by lrue eMt-we"t line

paQlnK thn>ugh aoulhernmoRI lip

of ManhllltAn Island "llho Batlery

S-2i"""

S23ne

8-2::1811

S-2inw

lIop

RotNo_

Clau

em

en

lD

o

(jl

TIERRA-A-017778
TIERRA-A-017779
TAU!.H: I (eOllI'd)

11,,,"

No.

--- ~-~ ---------_._--

No"".

--------- .._---~

AHTIiUR KILL. NI!:WARK BAY AND KILL VAN KULL

-1> 12 51 (0.0·2.0," Arthur Kill Thllt portion wlthlJ! New York portion Slate from mouth (al an eMI.

weslllne drawn trom 9Oulhem.

;.Q mosl point of Slaten Island at !:! Ward Polnltosoulhemmout point '" 01 Perth Amboy. Now Jersey. at c:::

!"eITy PolntJ to Outerbr1dge

n

r~

'-'

Croll~lng. :?;

V>

51 (;10 ·12.11) Arthur Kill 11...t portion within New York ~ 13

portion Slate lrom Outerbr1dge L'rosSlng

to Newark Bay oullet.

-'? 14 5102.11 . 14.8) Newark nil)' &luthern porllon ot BIIYIylll~ portion norlh 01 Staten 1.land within

New York Slstc betw ..en outlet

10 Atthur 1(111and outlet to

1<111Van 1{\l1I.

• gepnent of waters nie&.ll1lN'd In mU~1upl~r~.m rrom nlOlIL.hor Arthur KIJI

111,,1'

Ref·

No.

---------- ---.._-._-

S·221le

5238W

T-22ne

T-23nw

522 ..e SD Sf)

S 238W

S 230w

S 2JIlw Sf) ~~l.l

to>

00

(D

o

Ol

TIERRA-A-017780
un

.... lD

to 0

0

TABLF. I (COTI[ 'd)

n en

a

;;:: - ------ -~--- _. _._- ,.~.___...___._.L~~. _____.

n

Waf ..... =! M"p

~. /I"... 1M" Name lJ•• crlpllooo Ref. Clan Srand'ortb a

No. H ..... ~ No.

"

---~~_. -_.,-~--_. -~-- -------- - -- -----

~ III Sl (14,8 -18.0) KJll Van Hull Tllal portlonwllhln New York S·230w ~U SO

portJon Stale from outlet or Newark S--23ne

O4y l.o moulli of KllJ Van Run

(at north-90ulli line drown hvm

northetnmolll polot of Stalen

;a leland 10easlemmOtlt polntat

a

ConatJible Point, BayorU1e,New

~ Jef1\eyl_

n

n.

-.I 5TATF.N ISLAND TllIlltlTARJES

;jJ

~ HI SIP1D:m Graemere Lake laolaled bodlea of water. S-23ee B U

SI P 1039. l~aPond

SI P 103l1b Shore Acrea Pond

SI P 1040 Cameron Lake

11 51 P HMo.., Trlba, or New lllOlated ponds with New Creek S-Z3se B n

t2 P lO4Ob. CNJek walershed.

P 10000,

fi,) ~

P lOtOd

m

J8 SI I and tribe. New Creek Tidal e"lullry and fresh waleI' Irlbs. 5-23se ""

Tldlll portion. I I n

Fresh wale~ porUon. C C

0

'/.

V1 111 1:112 (h"..l Hill. Cr""k Itnlen GrnAllOn" Harbor $·238W ~

al Greal Kills Park. 5-2388 <

>

::::l

'"' 0

v. '/.

I

!

! TIERRA-A-017781
;>"';;

..::'.:.~'

..:];~:~~~~.H:}i·',.

.~-".'

REFERENCE NO. 18

- -

."-'-,

",-

','

:t- • ',-.'

\ ;:1 to·' ;. :. ~."'.;:. ( , :.r~ '\:~.--~:~;>.;:~;~~:~,..;.:;

; ':~ _'.~.,~:: T'-,~ ,. ~--'?'.~.

4;: .. ,.. "

, ~ ~':''', '.' ~.

." ).~~,"~~~ ;:~-~~:\~::.~:~~.-;t~~

~.' :\.;.- ....~.,>::...

,.; 1 ~.;' .: ~.~

-.

J, .

TIERRA-A-017782
f"

I

C'

~

".fl

-~

~ >- ::-.--,

---"

'-'

, ,

technIcal

No. 40

......... _ ..
·'.'.'.

REFERENCE NO.1 9

v·,'

.'..-~-'f':'~

.. ~.:~:..:" - .~:.

.-;.': ~~~-;·:"';;:~·t, '.~....

./: ~':: .

...~.

c .r '._•.!>

t.

". ;.... .... ~(--~,..

,

)

TIERRA-A-017784
'7?r /9

FIf:M

FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP

HACKENSACK

MEADOWLANDS

DISTRICT,

NEW JERSEY

BERGEN AND

HUDSON COUNTIES

PANEL 9 OF 10

(SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANEI.S NOT PRINTED)

COMMUNITY ·PANEl NUMBER

340570 0009 A

EFFECTIVE DATE:

DECEMBER 15, 1982

Federal Emergency Management Agency

p.'

j

1

j

j

~

TIERRA-A-017785
KEY TO MAP

SOD-Year Flood Boundary-----

lOO·Year Flood Boundary-----

Zone Designations.

lOa-Year Flood Boundary -----

SOO-Year Flood Boundary---~

Base Flood Elevation Line

With Elevation In Feet"

---513----

Base Flood Elevation in Feet

Where Uniform Within Zone··

IEL987)

Elevation Reference Mark RM7X

Zone 0 Boundary--------

River Mile -Ml.5

··Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929

*EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS

ZONE

A

EXPLANATION

Areas of 1DO-year flood; base flood elevations and

flood hnard factoB not determined.

Areas of lOO·year shallow flooding where depths

are between one (1) and three (3) feet; average depths

of inundation are shown, but no flood hazard factors

are determined.

Areas of lOO·year shallow flooding where depths

are between one (1) and th ree (3) feel; base fiood

elevations are shown, but no flood hazard factors

are determined.

Areas of laO-year flood; base flood elevat iom and

flood hUlIrd factors determined.

Areas of 1DO-year flood to be protecled by flood

protection system under construction; base flood

elevations and flood hazard factors not determined.

Areu between limits of the 10o-year flood and 5 00-

year flood; or ceruin areas subject to 1 DO-year flood·

ing with averllge depths less than one (1) foot or where

the contributing drainage are.a is less th.an one square

mile; or areu protected by levees from the base flood.

(Medium sh.ading)

Areas of minim.al f1oodmg. (No shadrng)

Areas of undetermined, but possible. flood hazards.

Areas of 10o-year coastal flood with velOCIty (wave

lIction); base flood elevations and flood halllrd faclDrs

not determined.

Areas of lOO·year coastal flood with velOCity (wave

action); base flood elevations and flood hazard factors

determined.

AD

AH

A1-A30

A99

B

c

o

V

Vl·VJO

NOTES TO USER

Certain areas not in the special flood hazard areas (zones t,. .od \,

may be protected by flood control structures.

This mllp is for flood insurance purposeS only; it does not neces·

sarlly show all areas subject to flooding in the communI!. or

1I1i planimetric features outside special flood hazard areas.

For lId;oining mllp pllnels. see separalely printed Inde~ To Map

Panell.

TIERRA-A-017786
-'.'<i"" '1.

I

I

.. ".' ;

•• ~ ~,&.~ ..

'~' .

. . .:'.~.

",'j' ....

. ' .

."'

I

1

\

400

APPROXIM ATE SCALE

o

=

.....'>'~'.

. .....

. .~~- ~..

TI ER RA-A-O'1:h~7 ~
;,: .~ ".. :,.

./ ",';",01.

4~~;~;·

I .-~.

}';" ,

; J:- ..

" ...... '

>.J," ',:1: ..:'::

• ~ ~ :.OC

,';' .

• J rr;

••. '.J • ~" .... ..., -"" :~~-.¥J~t}:i'~~

l,. ~.:-~-

REFERENCE NO. 20

TIERRA-A-017788
A GUIDE TO

HEAlTH j\DVISORIES FOR ----- - - -.- -- -

EATING FISH AND CRABS

--- ---- - -~ .------

CAUGHT IN NE\iV JERSEY\VATERS

--- ._. -_._--~--- - -~---

.~------------ ._- . --~

\\lhat vou need to kno\v ,

about recreational

fishing and crabbirlg

\ ~ r-h lQO; ::d .\ ,,1. ~II > ' • J Lo ItlOn

: -~':., C: Shlnr ... i;, Commls5lone;

\.''\ :e:<e';ne~w,men; r:~'::nvlronmen:al Pwtectlon

~, ..,

, · . ...:.0

I

p'

TIERRA-A-017789
Location Species Ad \'isorvlPwhibi tion

Ne~Jersey~~~i:W~' GeneraIPopulation-' .

:--':ntc: loe;)l advi$ories

m;)\' be more specific

t"(lrthe same species.

5~~l--dow.

Amencan cd . .

...h I n~l; t'.t~ :npn.· Ula:"i

lln(~' ;~ \\·t.>c~

stnped nas, .. (\-l-n~U:l1r~ li."'n ,h.:....j ...i. ~;~t"....\";tr',

;--; :lrC;l: ;ce r.ei(,w

o.

J

11-\1;complex includes Newark Bay,

Hackensack River downstream of

Oradell Dam, Arthur Kill. Kill Van

t-:ull. tidal portions of all rivers and

<rream< that ieed into these water

r.,J1t:S and

)

------------

Fa;,<<1\CRI\'er downstream of Dundee

I 1).1111 and streams that feed mto thIS I ,;ectlon oi the river,

striped bass *

Amencan e~l .. ,j~'r n,': J.:~: Tlh1!"C rnil~1

~'n(t" .I \"'~ek

blue crat- ..

bluefish (over 6 lbs.), white

perch and white ort'lsh

~'.; 1. ;\.:", ... :

,in not eat more than

{.'nCl' ~l \\"cek

all fish and shdli:,r M

blue crar- .. :-'.,1 ;\·t·~·

Hudson "I~ivcr...[~ ,'.:

.., .:.

.........~:~ i,.~~._:.~._

Hudson River includes the nver

downstream ofNY·NJ border

\ahcM 4 miles above Alpme. NJ)

anJ Upper New York Bay.

Amencan eel * ,...1,' t1,)T car rnl)rt than

\'IntI." .1 \\'~ek

~\' :l.n: ea:

smped b;Js:," ..It"l. rh."~ eaT :l'k'lr(' tn.1:',

~'Inee ;1 \\'ec~

bluefish (over 6 lb. '. wnnt'

perch and whm~ [arilsh

, blue crab

-i,' nut eat mort' thaI'

<JDet: a week

.j('l nnr eat !!reen

~lan,j t r1e~atl,)pancrea~ 'I :

.... n(~:C~ ..

\"i~·~not ea[ rreen

~JclnG l ne~Zlr('r,lj-:..::-('~I., \

'... ..

"', " ' )'1.-", : : . .' ..~.,"';' ....... '~,L,?.;. ~. .. I

ThIs comrlex includes the New

jer5e\' rortions of Sandy Hook and

R<lntan bays. the tidal portions of the

Rantan River (downstream of the Rre.

I bnd~ m Neu: BIUn$Wick)and the

tidal portions of all rivers-and streams

thar teed into these water bodies.

striped has< * ,j" n.'[ e;1r mDrt' than

~1nc<:a \"'~ck

•..1(1 not car

bluefish (,wer 6 Ih l. wn:tt"

perch and whlre ca,i "i,

j" nc': C;l: m,'n: than

. ':1[<' ., wt'e~

, blue crar- jp nor e;1t creen

.-i'ln,: l ilcr;1rllrancrcCls \

.-in nor eat green

~i;lnd l:,epatorrtnCre;1'::'~

TIERRA-A-017790
Northern CoastalWaters:,( . '.'. .... -~.~~...,:

- '. ~.::: .:~-

1.,:< '1~(,~ mcludes an coastal wate~ rrnm

~"l:-lra~ Sa" <;outhw the Bamel!<l1:lnier,

J., nnr C;H more than

.'nce .1 week

Camden Area

1.'11.< <1.re~mclude."SO"<Iwhidee Lake.

:=-cTt!1.'<l">:C:1 Creek (north ;mc ~uth

~~ln(:'.C:"). ~~:" Rl\rer and 1[5 d!"711~£e.

"'-~ ,,",P<"~ RL\'C: L,ke. Ste'Afl:':: L1ke ari2

"(0"':,,:": :..aJ<e.

all fl~h. shellfl~h and

c:ru~t;':lce(!n, *

In not ear

-'":~.m''1r:' R'\'e irnm Y,mllc\'. PA r0

':, .. : ..l.. ':'"':: ty,rcier

:-·:iClW'1rt' River tTom Yard/e\".r..\ (acro~"

~":n Ewtn," Twp., NJ) south to the

Che<:1N:ake and Delaware Canal

:, ,,,," :-'d;l\\-are RI\'cr tnclude; the nver

....~"'\,·('c~:ne F..l.. Tumrlke Bndce (l·:if

~-.i~t:"::0 P-llrll!'l£tonTwp, (Buritnl:"on

-~':::1:'o" an~:;l:-ch ~~k tn,~'1 T\~r.

, '"'ll:e<re I....i'unry' ;:l!"(lU( _ mile: f-eIO\\'

, ..'mm"iore B,~; Bndee.

:,;,,[;Jw:lrc Rrt'er from the DE/P:\

'-"';:\ le:- .;.,\l~~:'fn rhe-

~\~i;H'·.r:-:: .1;"1..1Cnes;1f'C:lke C::tna!

: ',,1'1\\ lr:, R:ver :=rom rhe CheSare<lKe

.1:-:.~ :-'::;]W:1re Canal \acro~ Trom

..:~j,.~~, ,,' , ""\Jr~ ti! mnutn of rhe

·':,1\'" , ...~. h:1\'

;~-. ....~-

..-

---......... ,';:'~::.:~~}~"~-- - - ~

Amencan ee!

ch;mne! catil~h *

white catfl~h

white perch

cnanne] C;HfI~h • dn nm eat

.In nor ear

:::rnfted 1--;1 .......

Ln~nne; c~r~'p;;r:

white caril~h

,Jr' nnr e;H mort." Than three

~""lmc(' me"l~ rcr v('"r

\'nr; Till.< {In"nnr: .,,;-~dift,.,., (m'.,

d!.;".rrr.: ll{{t'(J In tfUf ~n(I?U""

;: ';r;;I~,"~\'"I lnr~e specir~ from drsil:nalrd watrr bodirs IS prohjp;trd In 'e'-' }l'rSI'\.

~ ~:.• :.... ·::jl\":,,~~lai~ Include' mi3nr~. chddren unoe:" rhe a~e O~ !5. rre£,n:tr:~ womer:. i.~~·":nc n~;-'·~e;(. ~rjJ ""orne:; \~t c:'d\'lhe;~:"!n;,: .1e~ Thr'; ~rt.' :h~\"Ic:el~n(~r t.~ C"~. :In-

.... ~I<'~.- • ..::,,~r.{ ~akrn irom rht dtSl!~n3re-ci reL:IClnS~Inc'f' '[n.e~t' c~:-.tamln:ln~c: n:w!" ~ ('r~~.~·~>-'~::-,l:'"P ~"'lr. t~-e- Jt>velo-:'lfiC ~·_'"'\ltn~

. ,~I·', .'". :-:;r:1nc: n", rabnc ("\:"ane~~nn~ [("I rake- arw biue crrlh~ from tne((" wat!'~(

..... l~m~nJilnon ~a~ed on re!"ear;:~ S:rHl\"ln~ f"1~\·::ta·~ if'\"t-I-. (\~' ('h,,-,m~(::i' ,:,'~.'1~""" ... ":: .:'~' --.Il'=.' :!";..:;.. hc':"';'l~,,:," l~.C~C:1' ~:"., ':;llied th~ t::-c('~ !.:::"n..~

.. ~- . :.:->

TIERRA-A-017791
,

I

i

:/----

~_:t ......• ,'

• ~ . _j .r,:"' .:..."

:.~'-~

.. ~ ~ ...... ; .~; - -, "t'.i,·,

:~

• .i.-.f

.--

.. :~

,,:)~~;.~<~';~~~~}';~~ ..,.)(.:~~,'

"~"~r" ,~.' -. '~..~.~: ... -'

tr- "i'._'.,;~_.-.-

:'.·fi··'-:: ..;

'~'}'- . ' ....~

...~..~,

.. -1-'. ~

. ~.

,.-.

.,'

, -

" !

• ~ ..... ,., J • ., .. ,";..~' -,'

:!\~~~1tif~if{'1'~:•..

'.'.

I~'

.,

,", ..

'0':

REFERENCE NO. 21

TIERRA-A-017792
Sl"PERFl<:\"D TECH.'iICAL ASSESS)iE~"T A.'\"DRESPO~-sE TE-UI PROJECT .\"OTES

TO: UA!~:

Keegan Landfill file C6'0919"

FRO.\!.

K Carr.pb~ll

I

Sl"B..Jr:CT:

Wetlands in Site Yicinrry

I ?..uERE;\CE.

The following wetland tTom.age ami acreage were determi~ed using the Fifteen \file Surr"'a.::e

~Iigration Limit ~[ap for this Repon:

Water Bod\' Fronta~e (miles)

Surface Water Pathway

Wetland lake 4

Passaic River o

Hackensack River 10

Xewark Ba\' 0.1

.-\rthur Kill

Kill Van hull o

Cpper :\ ew York Bay

Hudson River o

The ~arrows o

I ,ower i'iew York Ray 0.1

.\iT Pathway

Distance Rim~(mi) Acreage

0- 1/4 225 ( mciudmg :0 on site)

> 1/4. 1/: 185

320

> I - 2 :n5

;. 2-3 625

880

TIERRA-A-017793
.......

.......:~J:::.;'-..... '.;'.' .'~~

'.

REFERENCE NO. 22

TIERRA-A-017794
SUPERFUND TECI-fl''lCAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT NOTES I

TO: VAn..: Page 1 of2 I

Kee21lI1 LlUldfiIlfile 05/12/97

nOM:

K. Campbell @

Sensitive Environments

Our office received information regarding sensitive environments in the site vicinity from the NJ Natural

Heritage Program (NHP). As the NHP data are sensitive in nature. the original NHP letter (5/1/97) is filed in the

"Confidential" !ffibsection of this TDD file and a general summlU!' of the NHP information is provided below:

Sensitive Environment Distance from Site (mi.>" Water Bod" Tvre

CAir & Smface Water)

• I;:tat ... I;..t..A

. . .. '

() r nl.<:t" If I;,,,,,,

(pied-Billed Grebe - Podilvmbus podiceps)

• Unique Biotic Community 0 CoastalfTidaJ

(Coastal Heron Rookery - Kearny Marsh)

fAir)

• State-listed endangered species 2.5 N/A

(Northern Harrier - Circus cvaneus)

• State-listed endangered species 2.5 N/A

(Sedge Wren - Cistothoms platensis)

• Federally.listed endangered species 3.5 N/A

(peregrine Falcon - Falco peregrinus)

• State-listed threatened species 1.5 N/A

(Savannah Sparrow. Passerculus sandwichensis)

• State-listed endangered species 1.5 N/A

(Minute Duckweed· Lemna perpusilla)

• State-listed endangered species 3.5 N/A

(Downy Phlox - Phlox pilosa)

• Estimated Values.

TIERRA-A-017795
SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM PROJl:CT NOTES

TO: UA1.t.: Page 2 of2

Keegan Landfill me 05/12/97

J'KUM:

K. Campbell to

:

Sensitive Environments

Sensitive Environment Distance from Site (mi.)" Water Bod,- T"pe

fAir - Continucd)o/'~"''';-;;;

• State-listed endangered species habitat 3.5 N/A

(Smooth Rattlesnake Root - Prenanthes racemosa)

• State-listed endangered species habitat 3.5 N/A

(Salt Marsh Bulrush - Scirpus maritimus)

(Surface W ater){(,~;i:':~~~~t;;;:':"-;i,'-'.

• Federally-listed endangered species 9 Coastalfr idal

.-

(peregrine Falcon - Falco peregrmus)

• State-listed endangered species 13 Coastalffidal

(LeastTem - Sterna antil/arum)

• State-listed endan~ered species L5 Coastalff idal

(Minute Duckweed - Lemna perpusilla)

• Unique Biotic Community 13 Coastalfridal

(Coastal Heron Rookery - Global Terminal)

~

~

"'-"

"'- "-"" "

• Estimated Values.

"-"-

"-"

"

f' 'Z

TIERRA-A-017796
REFERENCE NO. 23

TIERRA-A-017797
FROST ASSOCIATES

P.G.Box 495, Essex, Connecticut 06426

(203) 767-7644 FAX (203) 767-1971

March 28, 2997

To: Roy F. Weston Inc - Region II START

1090 King Georges Post Road, Suite 201

Edison, NJ

Attn: Subbarao Bhamidipati

Fr: Frost Associates

P.O. Box 495

Essex, Conn 06426

Tel: (203) 767-1254

Fax: (203) 767-7069

Sub: Kearney, NJ

CERCLIS:

Job: 1696

-'4"

Site Longitude:

Site Latitude

74-08-04

40-45-36

74.134453

40.759998

The CENTRACTS report below identifies the population, households, and private water

wells of each Block Group that lies within, or partlally wlthin, the 4, 3, 2, 1, .5,

and .25, mile "rings" of the latitude and longitude coordlnates above. CENTRACTS may

have up to ten radii of any length. 1000 block groups, and 15000 block group sldes.

CENTRACTS uses the 1990 Block Group population and Block Group house count data found

in the Census Bureau's 1990 STF-~ files. The sources of water supply data are from

the Bureau's 1990 STF-3A files. The boundary line coordinates of the Block Groups

were extracted from the Census Bureau's 1990 TIGER/Line Files.

CENTRACTS reports are created with programs wrltten by Frost Assoclates, P.O. Box

495, Essex, Conn. The code was written using Microsoft's Quick-Basic Ver. 4.5.

Latitude and LongitUde coordinates identlf\1lng a slte are entered In degrees and

decimal degrees. One or more county files holdl.ng BlOCk Group boundary lines are

selected for use by CENTRACTS by determining whether the site coordinates fall within

the minimum and maximum Lat\Lon coordinates of each county in the state.

Each Block Group line segment has Lat\Lon coordlnates representlng the "From" and

"To" ends of that line. All coordinates from the selected county files are read and

converted from degrees, decimal degrees to X\Y miles from the site location. Each

line segment is then examined whether it lies within or partially wlthln the maxlmum

ring from the site.

The unique Block Group ID numbers of each line segment that lie within the maximum

ring are retained. All Block Group boundary lines matching the Block Group numbers

are then extracted from the respective county files to obtaln all sldes of the included Block Groups. Boundary records are then sorted in adJacent side order to

determine the shape and area of each Block Group polygon.

TIERRA-A-017798
Kearney, NJ

A method to solve for the area of a polygo~ is to take one-half the sum of the products obtained by multiplying each X-coordinate by the difference between the adjacent Y-coordinates. For a polygon with coordinates at adjacent angles A, B, C, D, and

E. The formula can be expressed:

Area = 1/2(Xa(Ye-Yb)+ Xb(Ya-Yb)+ Xc (Yb-Yd) + Xd(Yc-Ye)+ Xe(Yd-Ya) )

For each ring, the selected Block Groups will be inside, outside, or intersected by

the ring. When a polygon is intersected, the partial Block Group area w~thin that

ring is calculated using the method described below.

When a ring intersects a Block Group, the intersect points are solved and plotted at

the points where the ring enters and exits the shape. The chord line, a l~ne within

the circle connecting the intersect points is determined. This chord line is used to

calculate the segment area, the half moon shape between the chord line and the ring,

and the sub-polygon created by the chord line and the Block Group boundar~es that l~e

outside the ring.

The segment area is subtracted from the sUb-polygon area to determine the area of the

sub-polygon outside the ring. The area outside the ring is then subtracted from the

area of the entire polygon to arr1ve at the inside area. This inside area is then

divided by the tract's total area to determine the percentage of area within the

ring. This process is repeated for each block group that is intersected by one of the

rings. The total area, partial area, and percentage of partial area of those block

groups within, or partially within a ring, are held in memory for the report.

On occasion, the algorithm described above is unable to determine the area of the

partial area. Within the report program 1S a "Paint" rout lone which allows an enclosed

shape to be hl.ghlighted. Another routlone calculates the percentage of highlighted

screen pixels to the pixels within the polygon. A manual entry is allowed. Both the

"paint" method and manual entry method over r1de the calculated method.

CENTRACTS lists, start~ng on page 4, all Block Groups l.n State, County, Census Tract,

and Block Group ID order that lie withl.n, or partially within, the maximum ring. Each

Block Group is 1dentif~ed by a City or Town name and by the Block Group's State,

County, Tract and Block Group ID number. Follow1ng l.S the Block Group's 1990 populu

t10n and house count extracted from the Census Bureau's 1990 STF-IA files.

The next four columns display water source data from the 1990 STF-3A files. The first

column is "Units with Public system or private company source of water", followed by

"Units with lond~vidual well, Drilled, source of water"; "Units with indivlodual well,

Dug, source of water" and "Units wl.th Other source of water".

For each ring, CENTRACTS then shows the Block Groups that are within that ring, the

Block Group's total area in square ml.les, the part~al area of the Block Group within

that r1ng, and the partloal percentage w~thl.n the rl.ng. The areas of the 1ncluded

Block Group and the part~al areas are then totaled.

The last section tallies the demographic data with~n each ring. The percentage of

area for each Block Group is mUltiplied times the census data for that Block Group

and totaled for all Block Group's within the ring. Ring totals are then dete~ned

by subtracting the three mile data from the four mile, the two mile from the three

mile, one from the two, etc... Population on private wells is calculated using the

formula: ({Dr~lled + Dug Wells) / Households) • Populatloon

TIERRA-A-017799
Kearney, NJ

==========.-=--=.~ Site Data =================

Population:

Households:

Drilled Wells:

Dug Wells:

Other Water Sources:

398451.00

157226.95

75.03

10.54

123.72

============= Partial (RING) data ===============

---- Within Ring: 4 Mile{s) and 3 Mile(s)

Population:

Households:

Drilled Wells:

Dug Wells:

Other Water Sources:

187456.13

76373.18

15.99

2.54

62.27

** Population On Private Wells: 45.50

---- Within Ring: 3 Mile{s) and 2 Mi1e(s)

Population: 128232.87 e:- J2 8.23 0

Households: 49619.38

Drilled Wells: 46.44

Dug Wells: 0.00

Other Water Sources: 42.90

.; -;'';',

** Population On Private Wells: 120.00

Within Ring: 2 Mile(s) and 1 Mi1e(s)

Population: 63217.52 ~ 6s,nCl

Households: 23694.14

Drilled Wells: 12.60

Dug Wells: 8.00

Other Water Sources: 18.55

** Population On Private Wells: 54.95

---- Within Ring: 1 Mile(s) and .5 Mile (s)

Population: 17486.37 4-- 11, '-{'Ie>

Households: 6737.39

Drilled Wells: 0.00

Dug Wells: 0.00

Other Water Sources: 0.00

** Population On Private Wells: 0.00

TIERRA-A-017800
Kearney, NJ

---- Within Ring: .5 Mile(s) and .25 Mile(s)

Population:

Households:

Drilled Wells:

Dug Wells:

Other Water Sources:

•• Population On Private Wells:

1823.32 ~ /,S?ZD

709.94

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

---- Within Ring: .25 Mile(s) and 0 Mile(s) ----

Population:

Households:

Drilled Wells:

Dug Wells:

other Water Sources:

234. 80 ~ '230

92.92

0.00

0.00

0.00

** Population On Private Wells: 0.00 .* Total Population On Private Wells: 220.45

1',r.2'3

TIERRA-A-017801
TIERRA-A-017802
DC).: ST ART-O:-F-Ol09:

--; . ~ . /-,

-. -(

FINAL

SITE INSPECTION PRIORITIZATION REPORT

KEEGAN LANDFILL

KEARNY, HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

CERCUS ID No.: NJD981490428

Prepared by:

Region n Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team

Roy F. Weston, Inc.

Federal Programs Division

Edison, New Jersey

prepared for:

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMEI\T'fAL PROTECTION AGENCY

EPA Contract No.: 68-W5-0019

TDD No.: 02-96-11-0044

Document Control No.: START-02-F-OI093

JUNE 1998

SUBMITTED BY:

Date "¥zh£:

Date 7;17/tPr

I 7

KEEGAN. SIP CCAOOOOS3

TIERRA-A-017803
REFERENCE NO. 24

TIERRA-A-017804
_......._--- -- ---

S l P

ku-<r~

l-<~c..r ....~ I NJ

I Nstionsf 31 Brand ACCOUNT BOOKS 9'1. x 6'/.'

IUemNo Numbered Pages RUling

I Green Book Cloth

200 Record

Journal

~ AVERY

~DENNISON

Office Products

Made In USA

Product Guarantee

Avery is mmmllled 10 prr'l\'idin~ Y'ou wilh qUJ.lJty product" and "'ill ~Iadl." replace

any product whIch does nOI pro\'lde complete satisfaction We also welcome your

comments and suggestions. Please send your correspondence with producl code 1Cl.

A very Di vision. Consumer ServIce Centcr

PO Box 5244

Diamond Bar. CA 9 I 765-4000

TIERRA-A-017805

/097
1

Ke~:§""r1 Lv." f {'I(-

Pe..r5IJV1411 c. r1 '" c... )

0730 .>T--1"'-( jV\t."1~l~> • /hN:f ...1 o-++Zc:.-e I I.." [J ..../ J

+1, -'14/+- flu jt' TTI.A.Cl.:;. ....."t Cr. "".

5-r/L2.T 1~"V(!i £~ .)-,I-e

JT4!Z-i c;,-..r • ./0 c.f s,'1-.:.

G - CtU"..... J! 5,'k ~1:-

!>- ;:::CH'., k--r 5 50

:r. D..:;>'tv '("";Q 5c.....f le-I v-.l t II",,/~

J. ':,'!;) ~" Sc.""f ~ /1>: C.-c.1

J. L t?, h.j- 5/'-1.:.)

"1 he- (c...,;~:[1 p'U-"'':( r~ '> hLf)'-''''ev 'vl~ ~

Ie, IJe- c..e ""ten + b( 0'-'-> - ,:;" M.~ ";-:--.!Jk. 5~!-"1;:>

b..,)1- r--/"-1,.C~ ,,-.. e/)-+r-o::.'l<-~ J ...,>t- 00 f:r.,/e. ~?oc--b.J

.,...,.;tt .f-rJ f..o ';;'l.:.-<'~.!" fete 1·\~'7t·{1 ~ ......../-/z::./'r,~~-.

-4 ve "I V't:: ,-,.- c- .. .:: ~A ~)(-'~ .4ve 'l-.. <!

s: -rA IC T ;-r'j-'" h. ~(... L.J-f' i '-<-'\ lo','y ,1:1 t

I~J5~ 4".rL.- ";"L<:-";J 1'1)<,.0.

070;" I/Je+O' 1 5Q ~~h, ~,,"9 LoI,'-'! ~cz-r-j'"" of'

E ?A: iCes I ~ VI J iA.,- r,...,..J a -t- -rtlk: >:-f-e. .

.:J l ~ ~ D ,c:: c:...... (( lc... i-( •.o -r Rot

II <..-oL{(?c..f.4 Ft,:)( ~c;.<\ +ro..veJ 1:,';) .../

/ ..)

4. .AJt.I- I Jr ~j'je .

Oe,~ 0 G c.. ,"> 1) , Po.v E fA /,/JC.'>o f .1cJ :-e 1..."., ~ .-../fc 10"'-f:J

'. .

!h{.K. c-~ fv'-JJlf~ C.;.,.h: ....a~; Ie."",",,,,ft) 0.... /e-ll-

. \

( "'" - J. , .t..< i ~'d_~." ""-..,,' 64 O\,,-t .... f:Jr ..... .....,..J

5 'rr-t. ........, ",""" 0 "'. " '.J,..... ,) ...J\ D,.I- .......~ 5..--t D.....{ji ..

) ~ I..... .. q

\""' -'""'''. v t,:; ... ,. \ '> • ;'..' ",- ~J ~t ~ ( '-r~~ > G It 5m.ll'~ \ w{)

~\ ., ""- 0-0(. r---~' '~r'''-<.,r :.t~l.,"'~ . ":I,,~ ~ I",I o;y, li, 1-1,-1'11, A"-'<...J 'f,...J. _"-.:....;.,r".-e l t/, {;u.tt?,----;- ~:-:/ 7/ ,,'u/<; 7

TIERRA-A-017806
111\- ...

,

J

t

,

=tl

- -1-

~ t

- ~

-- •,

f

-~--

j

- ~

-\

7/JO(,(7

I:'CtJ ~4.. ~f'{U-'" ~ o~.'.r..k -~ 0--e

;;.'(,K ~,:,l..e ~ { ~ 4. (LH\ .---"..~i 11c, L..:!.h,,:':"

I

or r.~ ll-t--J."),.J-.o; t ~<;i"'-: ....."'.}<..- ~l.'C~j /'().-J~

J!) ·hd..e.; f"~

F-ol Le~ S hL.-;' 0.' t 'F"I):.."L (ru('

)

~l...~ ~ytt...

p - C ). Le c.....L..sk ".:t h,u../ ot ~ ~

)

v:rt.. C~l...:", b...J..;y----P; .h..u~~

'"fQ >~.,.,..fJ_. ;J~ C't !"."..?'{.,-,r.f.-T:, ..>'~-P o..,;{-

?WPI /5"b()/ {O<~~..... L.!L"e. ""Ill b.e ,\~l.. ~

c..(.(__t~,> ~ loe->vt- \'0",\

Tr\W -l-o 'f't c;<..c.r~~ --to .. lQ L ....~ ~~

c.lo~ ~rt-A~ ~ }L...A '\.\ ,-I- -t..o O~1'l;v-..,

~.....D h.o ~ G-r....... c.u.-e~,> ~~J.

~_J~ +\." (. Co""-" ..J' pu,.f PIC.1.. "'1 D ~ ~ 1'C J

So-\:\; t~ ~4" St,..oi 0 t I'>')""J l ,....!.J 'l~ S ~~tJ

).."t'\ ..~ $"JO ~ 1<;.1)06 .

GG \ 1).~ \ (S~ c..r4~'.J 5 vvlj/ lo~.

\(~';~ ': pH -.: I

- Coll.1": lD 0 ...MI\.;s

S~(i -- < 0.5 p~-th:>....> •• .J

TQ.",v-': ).~0L.-

N ~ rot .....) \ ~... " ~\> .'! 0...,,-:.c. ':r'-"'~ 0 .....

Ot/ A.. o-r HrJ~ >, '",...J)~...k "~,, ~?oA

_ S'" -,~ lo~ __

Lollc.J. z9 5\....10 \ O\I\} S"v,;J-:; \~ ;-eld ~) .

f - 0.> ]"~ ~l \f cL'd

51-'v0 l.

$" ......,"'-- 1 .. \..<..\-.·., ~, '-H_"lf ..I-=-t-h1j- ~QI f.\I;,~

.o~ c..OAUt\\. c.. tltt.r:.,.. ~ "):>1::) v-rVLr rJ.. ~ ~,

r-J':I rt..J,~ Ir-~.t:i. \:a&<v~y-'....,....l ..,'" \-\t-.:.'J. I'GV't ......

1/\ l... .....I:>~.v-\-_ !::..~.[ __"- N (;-s 9~''''''' v" \~N\J u~~

t~ s....~.~\,f.'- ~~?~:-~a I/.Ctffl;1p'l!So/7 7

(f 5

11.

fuSe

II )0

--1

-.

~-I

!

..._~

- ~

I

~I

,

I

~

- "l

-I

I

------------L (

TIERRA-A-017807
7/30197

II Su y~,,"""7J """-LA"", r-oJc .V'<;'..L-r b:k..e c, IO~j +-r<-C.-~J f-r;

/:'''''' c....J:. ...... ~; ";,..' 'l.... ..... i-t 1Lv..- 1"'/lJ·J;U

..... J<;.> 'v<..S(. ~.,"V ~('('d j)""c Afr Q,/) 0., -+!~e. -ft-." ../o"l e·,..!,er.

G(,: b€.-J h, 0.~~ ....~, /, ....\- I P,cL...fJ u;1 I-b)

~ ?c..,jc.1-t, SL.J0/.

11.0 .;- J F '-<> {l (..Ie t ~!)l.; I .. 6;: ~ I~ ,.... ;r ( '-d-'~J ~O)/~C2. .

G6 J J V \ .1-.'4 , C S ife-t +0 rr~", ~ lKv,1(:'!f.

vJe-. t--'eFl1- -.J vl:>f ovCJ +-rt. '-k:.s .....+0 !~-'l.Jj!,tI I .....r,......:;.Q

rl§ L..T 0 ,( Z /-k"'1) ':..:;.., ~./<.. ... c.c.e~~ ,.'O .. .y) f.o t'r-J or

(Y)J vJiy/~ 0~ ..J!..,·\.<.,l~..- .~. i-./~ t-"'&'(-<~ ...

r;..·oJ(r - ',..,',; 'Je ~

II:r-fle..~r-ft..pr- VI .s .......... " .......... lo{,,"f-f hoH.SiZ.....Ot"l

L"'~!t..iJ o...... t- Coos L.ve "I1-.o/bM~'1.1

6v,tr i'''/- nO CC~ f' c~ l,.,e",rP "; c...:~?~

fro'" I~~

VI/'C. c... t:Ie,j7

n" 1...../-v'..Y .,L,. "10 c., .... s~ c.,5·'~"' .

Con ~ n:.d. fb ,"<. GC"- f{-.(;. /e,•.£r-~"l.1,

/J Jc DvG<-'V'I (. <lo-t!t£r .: LC (ls" ,"0," t ,...v.= 4_....{) c.. ..,

OP!!..I\ ......,.",.-kr I.AJC JJo.-<.-....Y <J.... i-..fi-.. ~,:k.r ,,{! :"t. ....,; ..

LM<L "die" < .~ J J-t... i .~ J/-..e C7/'t"c, #~ /v'uS

0tiIe[! !, c,.../l'1.'<. ""~ :.rf.ei.. ' , £...J:- : t- f'U ~ ~ ~.,

D~ l..fi....,~,Y ,c..t/'t2~,rj {.:.,6.:<- G.o'l."dc. -k.R. ..f-,. fC~

("~-,t-,k.,;rJ<.- o~ I{, ( /.Nt"t-k. ....;. L--.I{ W..-1 d,*""c?e /-1......:1

f'v'US lW1ft .:;, ~:~.t"i~. t-Vc... S'::wV ~ d~.;f bJ:.~

J,~'''o..... ) 5/10"-' if e~J'< f- I c,.,jJ c. 5"............ ..... fi!.~

eNterJ~..J:- t.WL~,.,f) " ..... f{t q ...... R./4 0+ .;..tv!' 0jJP--· ............. \-k:. ...

.'.r-. ,~~ L _ ;::> ... ..J r .Li vJ~···"'"' • y,,-I .). e. I ~., -,. _.~ ""Of I"

!5JO !""v'e ).,,,,,iL (/(rl'~"""'" c., 11 C,rc().>; ,~c.~.J~ (,,"rtt;7r-e fiyVl

11 .... rr......9) "".Q n\J';' Th ,,~ ...."'.'\.:;""'i.J CI'Ut"_

5A )(..Q ...s ...I.lt~ vv/h ~ I J:ee.'-Jc: ... +0 <2(,." ......u. M.fl.

:;0C?:' .:.,.,; >v,,·~"'i !v~_.I-,:"" """;,0 ) ..>r ~ 5S\~,J·-5'

-huM ..-veH-c,\.<h (h f· (l. .....') • V1.,.• Alh;l "Pec.~Cc..) -fo 4.(~{...

. . {. I ( ':":> . Clo:::.c.-t

Ie "'J. ~~U 1,.#...1 k Sr. '''f Q.~ "'" \;-, .::. {IJ u.fr..,;",,-, (:-I'e~ I

r "Ii /' rhL. w ~J/~J '\ '"'-- {"t 7,;,-, rue C.i~rc.~- t ~ t~...... .. .

_ C::'':'''~''''t:{/ l:._ be Vt...r~ 7/.J,,/.:j '7

TIERRA-A-017808
·---< -,

"7/,o( r- r1j, 7

Iis 0 P~ l", C-<J...- ~ ~ r~St- ~ L'l.fJL £,...et.,(

rJo-tt.I.: -rhe./'e... uV'..., {fJ.ff,f'.;~ q I~'"j c..{f c..c..:I"U ro"":'!

"",1 'f!.r",4..-.c.-<... o~ dhbn\ .:..-....fi...; ..... n,t ....;''i •.-v_k', ....·,..v: h::;

- J

G>.. {I Co. c...ets.t r-o-iJ> . >","\-1.£. <..0 >'\. > -I ~&-. ;~ /:,"7.~

'L J - I r r I \ p' 'e~ ( !:).I',e.-~ I (..,."c...r-el-e, b I..41-" l<l:'~·""",,...rl) (O~~i

rec..e"'-K-a- Je,os,'w (,'-'0 OV~/ '5rc .....+L. ') c.. ..... Q c. u..:!..;r

r--o~ «> c, ro-<- "t L( ~'''''{"3 J.e.vy) @ (.> ; f K·l--

0-r£ ......>;!.~ pNSe.", tf.'Jl . ~

De 61\,!>- !r'( l u.. "Vo k.L J V\ J.u.JL.e ~

ClS~ pl[~~ I +l~ I +uJ~ ) b~ I 5 4-,s.\) fCi-"(.~"1+

!'c...I'c..,.p I Co. ~.:.. ....Jorv;J" u..r- J Cc...~ !:::z;.'{+<:-:J) ce.U( ....+-,

•.. --~--- CQns i f'V.<:.Jl~" de~ ,..;~) fV\c,H-rfs<,) ;'D~ t ~ ",....t. )

--.---- _pl", ..1' :'-)f'\e.4tJ.. p.?~, j ·~':Jnr-1~'''~, ~~:c.t'~

- ~ . --_- - No l-e.: c.. f- &,; o~ n~,.. fL- ~.,.,c5J..:......, """""-<.J~+ tfc U~t; r. ""',.)

___._. JI) ~~ e-. (ll.,jro.l...f!..r 1'\ opc.--.vv-.--k..r wef'''' ....)

(-~ *-06' o~ &. .{e/'I'f~ fll.e

.--.- ilLfo ~~ \ r--~ .... .,?....A. ~ ID* v-r~_k. ~tk-. '1.4 .

----~ .. -, \~t s.:S -h...k 5 kJ.{'ll !A.(...,k( rQ~ s:-o~,

_0.--J 1 S....t..--t. ::)"" '" ,J)> oU' . ~J~- .

l'fl.fo VvQ.vJ,. -h:, ~iie..c."- L~ 0 \ _ l,-J["\..t ~ l .....·

o-~ 5ov..V\,., l· rY\.c&t "" c...u'SS N,,-i . ~U"'-{ \. tl'"

c;.r~<-C'c..."t'\t cL o""r·~ c...r{"" /,-th..r-tw, ~_ £VLi ot

~ ~ ,-,I c:.~ ~ kG... .\- ("....cke; • L--i ',l-l., ~ >3"""-<.

J

.;; ....·",t c...;"~J pvn,tc' v.Jv, l'l.l~1rt .~j" () ..e5e.

J.t. ~ \)~""\·vJ ...l,.t... w<+!Co\.,-J' (AI)"' ....~ Iv ~(7-

---- 1#~()OV~o(, e-. .At\c..J ~;'o.~ 1). ~J.,~

I·T\.~J4 ~lo..., .. ! h~~ t L rt rlv-,,~ h'7 J

. . r I r

!:?...Q~ c..~l\cJ }'-"v- "\. 7 \-e~t........-& ....... L...F 0 \

I Y

------- L(tv'-..":,,,~ o~ v.,...o\A...~-.I,A. o,i'~o"-<~ L.:.~n;,.,....

L5'b-u _ ~ l~hP l.f 0 I .

~. - f'~? ;- J~ l.<ll\tJ \",,~L': u \ (iocL.~~' jp~<.;,i)L~

"'~ve.) ~ .k<.:"d .),,~~.

,

I

..----'-

TIERRA·A·017809.
c....:.L.../hh,,''i /:'<. t,~ (,,: "~ ~-'f~+~/"-.M.:>jf c.L--C~(J

ro",l2. J;:- """'/" .t-cvV'" -1-0 ,~(f-e.' .........,- -wmrvl'U"I

Cd';' J:.iJt-K,.. 0 +- r'\. ....tF :<-( , 4s L, ""'- / I.

1-A WVlSq,(-+s .....: K. G-t;, c.,~;C r<-v.' I Jtc...(p.I..f...:, G.o((~vp.

v. .( 0..-1./(..(; s.. ....r.-..f~ ~'"\ CdL... "- + ft~ e:d..; e c·t ¥..e p; f.e ,

.11-/",,,, 1:>'-'1.<- 'S v6v ""f ~ I /;'1!". J !o"d Il,,,, j>11e

'''-LM\t'l.I'''J '" JS....u,..d ~o ~ t- c 1:.0l.{ of (I A -"c/_. .

~, Ji) lA:J f(! (j, LroJ. , G. bv..-'f 50' 1-....._ ~4:" ;/e _

IS'-f5 P - 0Ii 5i) l/l; I'oR G~';'j Lt i.J ~ , ~"";'j ~~+.

>G'"''ilt ;~ <:.-Oil t..L-i.eS ~.~ ";;';zI ?;Ie.- c-f 't>L. ).£.5",:':.,

i/i;> "'-c.. ~J. I'~ 'LQr/~I~~~........-; ) I;> ~ t '1 + we.,

d:~ •.> ~ ~ "'" 1:J.(;t\ IL..>+ Ij) .r'~"-~ (-j_~tI +.r-t.~J. I I~Cr

-1-' kc-... .; I h. .~t-, ') .

!.5j-o (.,\.>tuJ k~ 'J).. , ~ty

(- ~ 7 ' 4~k. p', l..(. -I-.., eF/-:--{........ I <11-? • ~'"'ff.e. Iv~--h.:,

-h.o e x (-", t" .... ~ (' ./d i fu ..'-....l "'v'f's+

vJ e ....+ b""-<.Ik. tv l--c.'''''''VL '''1.-~ (c:,,-+.

f 5 55 ~G " ..... !J J ~ L..-I c.. (I.~.('~7 h:.D f-Jt'.-"4 .:\-4 +-0 le.{{

(/.~ol.;;"~ ,'-> ') o~ ...........'" r.<"'--<H ·-"·1,.S ) ({o';,.<r -l-.~ ..._

4~ ~" r('L../\L (r-ee/..... '~ (.o ,J ~,., CJ ./f'",

w',K n~"·(r-'IJ""~ [n,,>'l...J tfr ..... M~ 1 d,.. ,.,., 1,'Is. CII"""n.j.

D~{~"- 1...·...Jf...U deh.-:· _ {A'.,I <.Allr,1 Lfo~ A~"'f.

v.l--..!l.?J b"',.J 1-.. Cc."V'~'.'I'\~' .f'0,t I ~c.1 1:.4-'-,,,,-,.

1015 Go I Let!;£C LI=-DJ {..""..... (JU".r~'" h>tr:~"f-~ ",bov-e •

P-oy? JF u.;!;~l-h;) L.;oJ, k(.. I'"..j x, .• I/,-<!'.~,;J-.

Ipd.; (.I\.\.,.L\~S i--O'C:(.~"d k~[)J , ~;- f]':: lH,,,,( t.v ...

~ ........rot f"5--t- ~. J-? 1 G- '- . J0 ~ c. g f...v({oo..,x).J

~c,1.P("'~ wf.>+ ~""""o'V\ Lf='uJ I to vc\,t<-, ~1/cJ''1-

~Z t-N...(}.~ (,\6'-'lJv.~ I ~'.It":.y.......\ f-.""'tk.~ ') .

n:; tlc.JI.N{,5 f/--tl.. po' k- C\ ...,J 1-,. L..c. ''''L'''~ <,,<-1V1.0,1 i<.t..rO~)

c:;..""<J~"'-t'-{' i...J.t~fc..'I.) tr..r[t-. ...7_,J 5~~p(j't f",L'~

Gr.",A. ;.:.0 ....(. ;.>v : f~ Co ~1' .... ( II,;,. .. J c",,('.:: s

~:. '-1'.t1 1'. &i:-(~ 7/';0/'1

--~---

TIERRA-A-017810
,I J;; (ft,

lI'Ja.. C<JI'I.-t .;.,~ r f;; vI"'{ 1<. &-,Lo"-J ~'J (.I'.,ef-L.i

. wIsh. -J).''"'5 LA.) Iu- \....tl" -h .~·uc.i,.0'l W .....( kd ~1111 (

vve... e~..~~f ~ Cc,,,J.. I{J .sL.·n...c .....f' <':'.l. f/t.f.

u'f'~"'" r..,J of r~/, 0fd Ok tt>Q.. n--y' If-;~

Civ. ...,,(.>(/ ~e.{J ....../ vo'(,lI~ 0'" C f/J:': k ('1r)('-(£./rZ',..,! J ~;'~

~ -fn.<..ks,,~ ,,{~O C,f:,,"brk ~.' ft..;~{l""IIt- f'I.£oLi,

. ...J:K.:... fly; Ic..,.,)·td I. ~J\.5".J .;f.~.j Ui£

i.--'t'f-{"",J "~(,. c..Lo~ ~ 'he.-I<J. ) ti..,;f ~"~ I:b"l

. .{.oLI.,)W:~ 1 I~ C() ... .-..ecfeJ lN~f/1 flit.- J...-.I-...-v"ItJ "'~ ~~

--f'W. 1~""":'~.J.rr ,{ tw- Wi:f{ ...U~ tt.....:i o{,'t'"'v'l? .l:ef"-l

(.;)"'-1. bl~ 0fL,...) s..y.../-t,....).

:L.A Me "no~eLJ tl\...; k....,: {( v" ....t ~ jef ~.<»t{C·5 0~""

ft,., ~;t £ 0 { rk I"",J ~','{( . lve &?5'''''.Jo v.,r..! I, &.:,; I~ .

4-..:J t1'..e UJ'IA.vu .....J )(J~+.

I

/65"0 8c.\.-L •.:t c.;. ......,vv..•..R)o,t. LA \N;LI ",Hk;"!.. f/.-e ,

Sh""'P"~ pi ......... o ..... 0'1\'1 J- ) L G-(,. +0 c",U h,...... U«>'"

c..1V' .....c..e. .J- tfr.e. ~:~ ,'", ¥-e ~"o'\l~) p",:. +0 ;f..-t

o~ s".v.lj "'l.A;"",j,'vs. .. ,,'Il.'i/ r~'I.Us vL"".,.y ~

C..() llec..+ eJ(~ 1eR.~"t ~c,.v"p~") pL...., ~ b..J'<,ro........J

500',\ .l.:y..~1 {.r Le4' tL~~~ .... : f{." I-eh~·i~ LF J.....L!~<; ,

l 1uo S TA (CT N\fjV,,~eM ("".<. p....~ j('-flu.~'" ~~J.t!-

.d ....~~:"""!, L~...j,~ +'<--vI-L. ~ l~l\Vf ~I'~t .

E.PA ~"'()~ L J ~ ",...J c.i') I {~f tiJ{ :.~k ~tft\.'. h,~

j

i~

i

Illc >TA 1',,1" IrL.f fill; ~',{.e . .:Jf),,~ JL ....~LI d;r.;:> (q

f{~ 5"'"",\Q~.> '-IT t:Pv L ,......~;,>Ov. NJ v ~ ) .

-------tk:4 //r;i1Itv~ TIERRA-A-017811
~

~,I-~

t

-*-- ,

--!

t

i

t'

1

•

..

I~. 1"{po-,, v'~"""'J (tv .;,,'~ ftl~VLJhu...,-I-- H-e d0'11 ~.

w.,.>....I-h~J ..,,~ .:.r-A./(T rvo<,../Jt-l' (".G-.'LI,'t<:-"i ,:;,-01 eN...&.. j

LJe ~"';'~ ,~~~ t,{ ~?A d..((,.;~J +0 cluv.y ~/X.

:. ... V1.flr~ .pi....... ".':> h:, llolJ./::' .-

I) ~I."",.~b; ~';".NIfle /rJl .....f/.~.'f. Sc..vI,)J <,,.../ 50'0,/ J

(..n~ .... 0.'£..( JI,<!,._ lO!Y'PSP\)(Lt.~~ ~eJ:l~f~ (:;~:i r~')

S ~C '-() ~ r.. i-<-e...t 1~:.. hi. ~ ~-t' ( ......e 1.'1).

t

2~ (1)L~c..~ .u\rt~ {'t,,)!L(1 ~lk ~"'""fi£J. .k~ ~

:>""-f'-{.,;''-'' .+ f-L.. I"J'-~*LII hi ""v.W. i/..zeH __

,(.......r'c~ (/......1'=0 (: L.;iJ..l J' Lt:iJ .!} w-( I"'C. c,J.d.e..J.. _&0

-!-l(. ~(.~( _~ -v.. -k. f...,. ...ic .....ve Jl&-rc,ckr.(._~d-JA.·""_. ~~

.....; tic..., I[Hi !.J ....... l;r"" ....,.....C ~ ,'{ s...'''fie: ~ro....... 0{..{.• > ~ i.e

..;...,.......0: 1',;, ...... 'l'v--'" ~ ••,~p.:.t.~"..... ~ Lj: 5fS.

{~ vJ:, i ?..~'I-J":lr r l':~ ,.~ " ..fc;·' h'o-v-S Sf.>c!, .... cJ.,J h",¥ ~~ Iv

,~~v...~t+v--:t-J! ......."'f,. -v:t;..;.... I\~ k vVC~ / XM,+-'o/'t

t--.v, ro."\~,i- IV """ILI. +!v' 1"'(IJ~·t{ ,'1. JL~{.-e.)J.._

G-(, ","./1 l-<..(/ fA. N'1VruVv fo c..v,.,,{r,..., -kll~ {'-<-.'of--

,,{ fC~ pI4,A.

e~, t.?J ....'J·\ S<~V\A./~:

Lc. ...C£L-. II s-'>M!i.( 1. L;:V [

L ;-0;}.

L- f:v 1

S I I. (-- I 61""L'~M. \ v.' i.:.l > uO 1 ...rr,'1( CrWI,. I~Jv.:k J

~ l/v'v '" I '>t:Ju J... (t="I1:."'l Cc-ed, J.t;__",--; ~..:. ... '),

~~ .; 51 s i) oJ =;- (1<-.fll c.,I-E + 5•.,,//5 ~0.

\- I) vl

TIERRA-A-017812
11'1 ,.~ fX- y-~.s left 6 fc,,J.

~v3-er. -h 0,...4 (jt- .

TIERRA-A-017813
J\a ... -

1{-:~~350S-rA/<T u',:, ~r:,;-d 0-' s'l-e ~. 7~q~

9

,(

. .-r ~____.. . 1<f?cJ'-::1 ~rfJ':// ;J /? ~""~!.'J' .5 M/( T Pt~~r!o. I

1-. G. G, /(I:."t 51 '1e .A-'~r

~__ J. ~\r>{ /"'0 >~·,-.tI-·~7/ i-vc>U .. " ..ti

. .__ -- 1::>' ~ c'- k~~ SsO

:T. F: IO>h ~M,d'~ / ~<:~""

_._ . _._ -J', L e ~Ih 1- :;'.#/U

_ ...._Q 9oo. .. Gc;. '-did IIJ~.{,.t.>o 4(A';' 1- c-! EPA Rp/f:"~'

I,A J'r-~<.+JJ &G -h, utter. +- .) ~'1""1Ct~ ~ ......

i..T . .!~-l-'I.d,"uP ",_l'-t'.c.. ,,+ v-Ie>1-n.cr-+(uv(~+ eiy-'.E.f._ ..

~~ --r-- u __ (Pl.1.S~'J-!1 . TAe.se .,../;1{ be. €~+.!:;._><,(!{~-~'v+-"

:. --t- __I,.M/~~ . ,'1'\ e-.,J'JJ:" ..... ~ t'ov'>r. qlf'C'~)ld ,/' ~r1 •

.: [ vI.>/l... -kt""" +0 JOUAMt',&f #"~J... /~~sf- 0..4 -""tie ..::rf

V '. we-Uc.J ~r-o-I.'k~,:",. A/so ,-<>f cl '',It;-:'h~ 5~""14-s. r -'~,.A r k" -h cf.O'-.....-+1~",.f- [) _ l M; ~_ of. we~ ....J-...

. .~ ..J~ ,,+ ea.~+ ",JjL ,~ le-,,,PC.{( (,,~~t../' Lfor~.

5v.f€- ~+,..,;;::.-/..~.....-"~~ : cr >t1.J.,..,;.,f ..J..,. ') +- ..J

&"'1..'- JI,,~,\-J 5,-,~i ~c.-fle... -h,r- u.'YVr-rl~_-- ~

.. .I........~+d' ...... ".>--l-e SC''''''f~£ v.{[~(. 0. ~e.>+ercP.<':1-'----

__07/0 eG- ..:).(L p~ ..... t , Dr 1':>"'~~ L"j jC~ .....it:Ce ,,#1e-- ...

.Jet- V (;,r J~N1f I.':",;; •

. We...+f...e-r ~ ~~n ...a l 70s -10 KD~ J Go·\o-1-f.., ....+=.~~..

. O!~~_6C Oi/L) ,j~ -I-o~;' -'LAb......-6~,.. +.:. 5" -~/!'tJ oo.vt

Se,. .....rLt. I fJe..--. t. o-""'j,. .s.Po fI ~ t:{).t.( I &t n.J2 Shoe

( ~ ~L,(.~( 5"10'3 ~t'd'-e.N"'t7 ..~ P!"1"t,:-h c,! 5t>O/) ,

oJ!- J..:rl, "''1t u,c r;-(-'pp'~ l::t,.J.l-les., de o:..-c'1.-'l':'-:'J

c.-.:,Llc:.\..-ft~ -hPIY evJ -/--'---'-fp bL...,.(~ .

r~ 15 c..G ....J 1:> ~ L k ~."''''''-,.,)fJ<.r. 06 s:<:w 4

\7'\ '\ 'J'j J- [)'.d- V'I',~ v<;;/l", ~ ne {\r /.' -.. {,)fC?" -0.-1:-, f-<.v

v.K J.{c--J. c,--<,,,, Jo.·-.lJ', """."J..Jlr. o"ues-'. /'o ....J .

p.,-t Co"""""", ..J eOI\- \ 'i,K--.rr-eJ. IbQ'-..t} btttHa.},o-h.

10 '-t Q (y(.. .:5 ~ "' ~ D~ +u \ \} \' ~r St.>J ~ c..~ \ 1-', L-"~

Q~"'>'

t

t

t

•I

1

-------------------------- -- -

TIERRA-A-017814
,,

J

1050

{( (5

[11-0.

II )S

i7 ~v

A+ La,:..)- ...." ) t>ol, /t.}:/ (<'5/- df- L.fc i

!>t= ~l~c ..J1 ~e Jc.. ......~4- _

P-O~9 D( c.oLI u,..!.-i"1 >b0~', ~J 2<.-..,':-

r 'j I I ,,( -I' I

;:>l...-f~ .~ v..o..r-(.( ~ "" .... '" ) (.Q ......po-..eJ' oT ~ \.~ .V\. .... -~

;::.: ~ ~ 0..--£ dCl.'0) .;'Q~ C)~.. '>~~ v't')Cl.t.C'L

[- {"(SoW UJ Ue...0-:-'''~ 517'; ~, Go..~"\JI..r ~l"'<f4-.o·j

+vI S1)cLf I (c.. .....'~ .bo~+ ~vV\ yv.e-ke51.--. I ~ ~

b :;;c¢f~ br ;~.L "'+ e..J o-\-~ ~:> ~

).o~e..t",,,,,,",, ..t 'l.c.{..po;s. roe-..Y-

~ Lc~ b"c-X) jl) ~--.fl JC

'30r:"'~D""t ~ c..oLLev+ ~C<./,

P - ~o J~ c...~ J~ •"'\ lovT D" VV'::""1 .to

S~-ol"i.. ;,.,.. .. 11 <;, ir.,v c t p4 "'<:S ",,'tie.; l~

fY\..'j,He. o~ V'",4 (' I~ (s"'.,,"{ Jvc; I j/UJ ~ A

~ ....:,~ \ f-o...-- w ~e·,<.e ~r....M ....-'.:...> -h, k:.oVl , f;r-£ -i ,

~vJc.."\ r c..-J. her-c'\ i""ft 0LL., >-R;~ on

b~~£.J -~reU\ (2.¥\<? r..y"';) r....n' J 10,..) ,:"."

1~c.A 1'....v.~J ..

!>; '.>I~ .h, ~ tV 5i)o(., ~ .......

/II Il' . .j'

':> 0'" t !t~(,~ C. ~ { j<A S ~ .... e > 0 t- ne J' ~

~e.vtS~ t"1l",d}. ~ rr;..r.')C- ;-,\lJ r~ :

bc;. c...ol\e.~ S\)Q\.o . 7"....,.A!~ ~... \~:",'tb~ tlC

d o.A'\ ... bl'ov' ....,,'\ \ t (..j\~ Jr-t.~ cJ~ , '~-t-<-r"'-'

M"" h.,..~I.v\. .>.... t;...(.c! s ......."t<- ...-1 """,+ <c'w.i (;. ...:1' /.,,,,,'J .

No ~,,-,\:v.l't, o~ '1'1-.44. N" ~-e,,,),-S'. Ci.~lJ~t. 6''-1:I('O~

0 .... I-!,\)V-.

lYJ"",cA Jebr-~) '''\ "',..;;: ~f'c,_'f'-~ ~ k.C1C"f. ( .......... ,k, ~f'<,

,

''''-~JI'~ t:;, bob.&.er o.. ...s 1',,4>-p .......i..e.; c(,~~l"CA.1 1,'.1.

11\L~ +wo ;k""IT wc.-{' .... lllck i., 1l.~-il.,L( U.,•••f l-~

c.r-","",""k~ -~~s ""'.J..lt....f k ~-'...." 1 ... .i~·tI ......u; c"l '-

.k')l.-trcr· i;)'\',~'j.!> /; (-i) ..I.~ .. ) .....i B C Cc." 1.'1)

6F ~'",,'l~~ '-10 lkd..~ ~~o~.
~

t

..

~

l

•~...

t

i

•I

I

-

•

.....~.

t·-=

r

,

i

::-

l

•

i

-- •

r

,

...

~ •

I

;;

~

•

;0-

j

<'

I.,

?-tf':1

( ~. '.....0) I

,r-v.v< -> v J c.- 0f~/1 - ......'i I..::>,-j

e""'Q ,..')< .... i- t-'?4c..."J "'"1'0" IeR... +-'-"L('..$ k ft....-"

,-')h~ ('>'N~) .

NDt.e~ II...e~ ~~ 5(0---' <::v':ho1 ce. ~+ c....."..,.t..-ti

....~ ,h..-t ~ "J~v") f,e" .... :Je.J- ~t?.s~~~

.L '

0)'- ."~lc..l .

1)~ l"'e.h..J'.II~ +t, >.......J. ' ~;.~.

:> D t..".j; .I F c. N,:.,..eJ cL-t 5t..,.•/, 10 (;..1'.-&;•.,

S Do 4 ,,~y ~5"'l ~ Lot Lt" -f ,f~""1~. '>J~'Y!e

(

. " . - 0 'L L· t,. Ss # /./

o C-<-\,.t, 11..... '> ? 0 ,n> ..... 'Jr-o."'r:; .0 _.t1•.r r'-1 _,.

~ SDQ? c.LoVLJ (o.-1,y fU( e//5l C--' ~e-fG.J .

iJ.....e.a .;,H.- ~JIJ...e ..... ~et...,'.Y J.v ....tt.. P~I'''--5n.,d·-c.,. '1.0

P'I '- h-.> -f. ~ t'-(... .

0~ yrs. -tv t...-L.vt,..". .. ,.)i rod-- fo clIVi> 0 ({

)?..;""f~' 51)0-': (.J 5po<" Co./Il ,to ~,,"'U ~f~C-o ....

GG- V\ro~s ~ J'6 G, .....P J"f= AI'(? r~.f,...r_"'~

h'V\ /,,"vf'Do'\, ')·~o 4 I~ /)ae.+.

p J#u, J D Go.J; .J;- l',1+e;v)f~ h. ,..("h.,.. ~ tv,. .....

." (, A-. J ,.... /0 (""'I. ~ '" Si.)~"-I .

.

P ....~kj ~..:lo...+ ..... f 01= .d..... rf'le.J c..,[t J....t!JJ ~.Pl-r

) I

+0 i ........Il,J.\ bo"'.~ ~r- S?::'-O'tS/::'O[1 ,"' ....[) Sbo9·

JG=- J~~r..r·,\'eb ~"1""r~ S:;.<;J'i ....> P(4,rk bru""" ......

-h Jt o J ",.../( {>.--.. ... /'j r?"':f''1~'- ;-', If- Vv; ~ Jebr",>

. ( ~Lk,; J~i'.d \c..). S~-i'le. volle ,k,! ~f :J..S J

\)fl'il...-J J'--.\U Svr~ ...u- c"s.."",t- t' ,'",~ f.-~II~ J •

rJ. C'.\..,p-'\ VV' .-1O"-<.~I~-:' .,.~I/...-e ~4cJ)f"1v....) ,:'" /1JJL{.

\ '

>"'\',,,,'-) .,,+ vI""1le..,- jl..? ....t prt,

J\) "'..... J .= f ~f~ ,'" \~~.j- ,,-\-->!>o, L,,~>'\.

vJ: l \ lV\€ ....~....r-t :5 50 +0 >!> 'C '\ --l4"d' bt,' teJ:.6>

~ ~ ~O'" ~ - 1'1.0 (·~\-..N<')f J: ~c l:o"\ .

Lt......-c.,kC ~..,;>.J ....~ ~~'n~· .:7"\':) h. 4-<..0. .1.o./-e.;.~fh.+V>.

;>;: ~: (,.(r ,I..",orf<.' (JW:'):"-,,-~ ~.\--. c...~ .•~, pO>~. I'

__ 0:" ~.,F F. Gz£(J---(· '" 7!J,(fl

- --,

II]a . GG- .f.t./u, f' Ic...-Ic-.~

look."1 i'L.,sr115;)

\)'-)0

i!"lO

1/ 5'5

1

_..J

I

TIERRA-A-017816
12

7/3; 1'17

Ijl; c:,J G-l "r-I,~Jr LJ::- we1lt.."j 0 .....

IJIl e~te.r..-.. :> ~ .}, I..,.J-kU _ T 1-t2.-.l ;,. ~

(:+J..lJ. .> -It.. ......;:'1 v-..Jv (N'.~ I.t » )~

~ ~5~ J"cY' ~

Ger Jil~, +u ..L-,;..~ '" j:)'} IOl..",-tl~-., ~

S b \l ."" vt H~ (.\r-,,?~ ~ .

Ge- '-Clle.c..~ fD II ~,N1 Uttw.Q c...re:... ..

IL'\.tr{. '.. V2r-a ',·tile. ~.J..z·"\c9 ';'J ~~-T b~

~ll :)'""O~--..& i> ~c,-k~ ",.--.eS' ~_~ .

. tq,L' ·"f~f'e.5""'\\ks.: 3iJ h...\ ~~ ~ 1'1.() p"-cl-o.

c ~ - ...?<"-p~ .J,~~ ......_si~: _'.._

t~~~-"C-·- - /

....If I "t'\ rt..e l~('c. "",I ) ·0_

7" :5o~

r.

jJo~

(

. r-L ,0

\ 'Y7~. Df", c..e IIHJ'-> S~ \ \).

S~""p\9. \ 0 '--"'\ I-h ~") bOO' ~ V' H1Wf>-+ o~

loe-.e.~ s1)\I~~ CO Il~ d- e) ~ro...... ek.e.. 0 ~

vtC~I"'r..) c..r-(:", 'V YO' -t-1"\i'Y\ R'l<- ~~ ..

L()l{,..h~,,\ ~<, "" r"",.1eb htJ.lf -JrVlW\ r+~ 1

~"""'\:."'7t .. fij 114 U.~N' .. , ~o I\.'Q pl"",,-

!7'-i'5 . ~f ~;A\'~k1 4>U( lh) >~\O ..

iV<L ....2J;- !y-...i.. '"'P h, QR... ~ (,. pc.q co{{
J .?"5 ~ L> ( ~ 'lJ _GG D...c.J" f,;, C<Y'NI4".J j> 0:/' w ,:.A _.

._.. $"'>"'" fLe-. .SD I' Co. -J S J:>I O. ;) F 5CJe:;. -4. k."':r

{.,A",...,L.. vi>£- ~Lt. :-vo.\" _ Gc (-'"if (jJ :J~ o-P :Ji!~.

. I

~ l't.le.,.. ~[leJU C--, Ii 3 $""""";-L~S,, s.c-Pft/~..;:t

t:J-(+lo";~ i 1-10•....; ;...,~tJ(~1 /y...c.J f,;,_~oc...+ l.""a~-.

C)

ILf,)o &G- ,<hb h<!lf .J) ...,..J J-F ~ef ~o,,-f f. ....J_,,(

u.r,,{u". rJ~U,;~ -h.r r:...,U~d,,).\ c+ 5to1, Sl)or;Hv.q </t-f..J,.,[~p"7·).o.

i'-f30 &o""t l:' c.,.l o~ v"kr I C)'Vi-o ~,",0'-11,,~·../ ~'('-~

fo l.o...-.;-. .....'\ ....J! r;J~.tCO .......""'<IJ. p.;;.t- I ~Lw"t- J"" ....J, L~_{<.)_

Ci-:d re:.J() +u 10 _5c?1 ~c..L(<'Y'\:>"''''; f~;!.f .~,.J

~ ~...j) }{.: Ir.r.e,J c'"' -fles

rx:: I .3}) • G-.o'\.J Gc' vV('''~ +-0 L-<J{lrc:+ ;c,c..fJr:u~/J./s.

4r:rlJJ c) lo~.:...-hb'\ . ?~r(-eJ (1(;;' ....5.1Vn;"'...,

Are-. ~t1Jl WLJ I..e.J -it" 1'0.,) ,i--. -k. il J.'Jhr"<. j'.~',.f.to.rO"

8i oct....)~(.,\L...o ~ '-f 7, +0 .eJ y. o~" r! ~ IN':' fer_

-rhc..r II h '-;..... rI\ ;J :..I i' e. c L- +4 :'> ( 0 J .

/51')

i-51o

I;5~o ."S \) v.:l ~\ e c+-s St> I). .

?- (q :;- 1) ~Jllec~"",'d 5}>1.1. I ~l..''J n~.-..;~"YP;+.

5c,,""f\t. ;.,. c..\- e(~ ~t of'" -"",k-r c.~~} ~Q,.,..I

L.f I ,'", ~""" -J1"er<:- p.... f't.'J,..,..~r~ l.)~:.~) fu_ 'j"~w

Vt.~ J-~"II.. /:;)N""';'" , >lt~ "" .....c..4 ,~.-t:f ...~ I '-?J~

~o~ ) -ht...J1 ft'~l.\.t.~ .

Th~'~ ... ~:rt. 0,6,-..1" :2' ~r-o"'" '..~""'fe L.~~'\.

VSW ~,',,~~~ Sb\~ - \\:') c..~.J "01

_ I\.Q('"~-(\'f'~_~~ J

~~ ~_rY' r;'\<..l \e-- ....~ J~~ ~...~t ,._·/\w-)~C~~~""-l+Ntl~" 11

( ?" /~/f I -c?iI .......XJ 7/j'/) 1

-~ - --.~ - - - . - ~

TIERRA-A-017818 ---\
., A

l.:i

7 /1/ /~'7 '

/5S' 5 Co II (. c+ ~KO ~ ~+ leA.9..,~~t!f.~~C- c~ vJet4

c. ('e." (I.e..,;...r. -hA ............ PL k,- ,......v\ ~ _ .A~l<i...i- .2.:? I Nf

Ql rv.M~ f""l~JV'-~ I 5 I lJ';, J,. J'~ ~ ~\ .

P - ;).0 D~ CAI:U~ 10~I(O{ J ~"'J

V\[) r-~tJ<,:J

Sc..""fl{ I's. J",:! .J-.. N\.-o;:o+- I vfr

d

J.41't6,...".....,,,, ~.:-.<-~

~; 11- vJ iH.,. . 11.f1.-4. ,--i~, II ...""\f!~ . ,"",0+ ~~) _

~"O J..IL~,..:.~/ ~~~ \.

Ib0'; l~ l:>'-<.A ~ Go--""t-.Ji f·)t- I ciroJpd 1I~\

~""'I'\:"" J; Ieof + ~ ,-t.-e _"_

I b I 0 :rI) ......Q L,G- +0 Co' ~ L~t..k. y--rv.J (~"-"I.~l'- ':l "

IfD 1'; Arf'~..;J.. ....-t e--J. 0 ~ f)c.rczcvJr;( Sf-I...({ ~11f'v.• {(7(j'{)

.,h.:.,.. en 9 0..( /"O ••.P (I--~r: iJ '\.f- -/..-r:-c-t;$ \ ;,

r;.,L.t;c..C) b.......~l1. /t vvv../2 hill-er- -/-v S"-l.-t ~

l.2. c-..J. !,.J. w: U._.~.~ v<-.. ./0. /'~v":'( K Ct4 ~ h"r-.~'-f

.b. 5e± -0 s.J.,~ {D~~"- ~(>tV~7

LJoo ~:'':br~' \;...tlv>l .. , .vk.t r (, '" -\.-<v.\.iL~ ~-.4 ~I~\~

____ ~ClJ\ -LL':l ~).t (j~ J,~ ...lt , r=I"'1/\ll we+-4,rJ c;.ro.f~f

~.:.__ ~ ~_ih e'lf-+ C1; "",\(}+ c../~p f~("/cJ:_($ ....... L(

_.'. ._ .(A;:,~"~ -te KeeSt" ,rJe). 'fc,'k -!:--o l-rJ/~c-L

rF.-.~l c".).. l-'i.";' 8.1).2. of, ).~+-..r-"!'{1/ tVfi-//i/lJ

P~""c5",,;h~ U,,,-{'t<,, '75 I nOr- ~ ~+ fn..d<-J

11\JU j 1). C4Ilu. ~ ;; p /~ . ~.~---" ,

,. IJ \ .... rJ ... c...~8~t"""- I',.,.~"-->\-I'~ cr- J:'A ....f.~--~,> !t-',"1\.:"

! It!V~ ,+. ~{..L ,e'i.tr-+- ~,J.t.. .. Ther,cc.1 .~4..

\:~--_- ~~\~L~ b"j\~~L~ rv ~~o ~u~ ~..~, ~,jJ~\ ( _

, . -to +-4..c. no("4-~ 'C\ >.1- ~,( -K.-c,," _ ..

: _Su. ~ ~_.Y ....;;5 __~_}> L-ll ~<JI~) ~J)I!"t t.C.I~ Mr:~ A_

r--~~'; ~~~~'\'rlt ,'j ver-J J ......I< hr9~'"" , S d ~ II!'Jc...~L

. ~ >~ ~~':..~J~t, H _~:~ I ~ s-<.-~><-_~---~

. -_. . -,-r;__.117 Y--rr:II.~-~~~-~-O~7.~J~ .

l

j
10

7//1/1 7

vV'c-.llcel ).; ~

"" joeJ J"o~ I I.~O-..

IIJ 0 (. r,,~h.cJ Cr;! 1~1..-tj,~ :;;b I:>

__~ 1°"'5 fn-c I..~ 1 I '.JOt-,~ /or

_ for J." L,.J.. 9 r()'" I'l) .

J Jato .tJ~cl.. a. -t -J-".".,,,I, J +~r-e Gr.e ""0 q~lJjJ~ j.'l.c.-k5'i)~d

Joc..Nk~Vtf,.. . I/'~ c,.If VoJe,J.I .. n./~ J 1'1.J I"1f

l ...J

nrt4r. ";.,,,e ~;>'Jr><_O o~ cJe6r-/$ kll '1'1-fj,~r,J 191"

6f-l. V?l"':J c I().i-C to ((12 ~.s. ~P~.'JejJ n(/,I- ~-

~ /;I~C-l 'i ~/~,. S'1.l"'lrk" /J.L-....R ~~ Jo (..fjm.~J

Pw·L,

17.ro 'G c.~ .:T'P .L..rJt .. J.. C1J>'l441t;",Qj~~L. I);::

.......) Ip( l. J c. Gc (, T'L' n ) ~ I f' ~ -.J P~e.-"'C.."j' ~~_.-

_i~JJ ~'''--fil:..r

}7)) p4.(}L ~t ~ I Irtf- f.;ok._

I"i}.;o ~2j'<'~' (,.,l.:.'J L+C-!'t-.~".., /r..l. -tv J'<f' <Jw+ h-c.,..{ c.~ei.,

-f{"U! (r-~eL -A"} ,.i,;"J ,1..E' L(: C;~~J:~-"'.J! ~--

ft...t..n Cl. •• ;UC] j.....,,~ il{~e t-k..rr·:""' .....4.te. __ f',--""'--, .....~ __;..

t Iv....--i- ",,,~,- .• l-k" '~Q" 4,,-.e.. , b.....+ U~a. 'i ..... ,T. -

l L.t'- ~ .J ••~N"...- 0 ~r :,J'.!t 0 \ ~ i'~ .•~ _ 7

1 ~ i ()

fl..o~>

6';l GG- ,-t :.prr"" .Jll~ /1DO. ~_r.s~I~

~'f'L ,-U ~v"",n.~ c' n-,::. .....t'f--L"V'9:. 1...j'· ..e<"'_..!\'~J~'t',,*

iu l(,;l{'t""" L~ ~ll _ L ;J.d-,~ Sw' ~ ~( tn.~

'J (,I .1. • . II ",I,. 1'"1'0<.." ,\(1'- ~ c~ 't,...e ~ ,+-< ..

------ -

TIERRA-A-017820
16

LrOl

li="o3

5.,'11 ~{(ol 7/) I(C, 7

S w'a I/5> 1)0 I (~/,;, Cl'f(~ "'f ~ 7/J:)h7

5j,~':6,/ ~f) 0 5" (.;-,-/)/

SWOJ.ISOo~ (I-,.."L Go.tIL.L~-.) _ J/

;; D D 5 7/J/;17

':> uQ'i

~

s~o(..

:'60 7

sL\o ~

~ Do <;

~

I

i

,

J

'S ~ ( I

-;{)I.2._

S !) j)

f

v

-

I

- TIERRA-A-017821
-- ..

-- ...

~ -----

4j;:. J

s-DcII

515;6I

~

J

\5
JJ)~ 7h,Ju

TIERRA-A-917823 - ............ "10" ...


REFERENCE NO. 25

TIERRA-A-017826
SAMPLING TRIP REPORT

SITE NAME: Keegan Landfill Site

DCN: START-02-F-OI518

IDD #: 02-96-11-0044B

CASE NO.: 25601

EPA"1.D. NO.: NJD981490428

SAMPLING DATES: 30 and 31 July 1997

1. Site Location: Refer to Figure 1

2. Sample Locations: Refer to Figure 2

3. Sample Descriptions: Refer to Table I

4. Laboratories Receiving Samples:

SampleT~ Name and Address of Laboratory

Target Compound List

(TCL)

Southwest Labs of Oklahoma

1700 West Albany

Suite C

Broken Arrow, OK 74012

Target Analyte List (TAL)

Metals (excluding cyanide)

Sentinel, Inc.

2800 Bob Wallace Avenue - Suite L3

Huntsville, AL 35805

5. Sample Dispatch Data:

One aqueous rinsate, six soil/sediment, and three surface water samples were shipped to Sentinel,

Inc. for TAL metal analysis on 30 July 1997 at 1730 hours via Federal Express (Air Bill No.

1550042524).

One aqueous rinsate and eleven soil/sediment samples were shipped to Sentinel, Inc. for TAL

metal analysis on 31 July 1997 at 1830 hours via Federal Express (Air Bill No. 1550042513).

One aqueous rinsate, six soil/sediment, and three surface water samples were shipped to Southwest

Labs of Oklahoma for TeL volatiles, BNA, and Pesticides/Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB)

analysis. A trip blank was also submitted for TCL volatiles analysis. The samples were shipped

on 30 July 1997 at 1730 hours via Federal Express (Air Bill No. 1550042561).

p.l

TIERRA-A-017827
One aqueous rinsate and eleven soil/sediment samples were shipped to Southwest Labs of

Oklahoma for TeL volatiles, BNA, and Pesticides/PCB analysis on 31 July 1997 at 1830 hours

via federal Express (Air Bill No. 1550042480).

6. On-Site Personnel:

Company Duties on Site

IIdefonso Acosta

Gerry Gilliland

Dennis Foerter

Jennifer Leahy

Region II EPA

Region II START

Region II START

Region II START

Representing EPA TM

Task Manager

Health and Safety Officer

Sample Management Officer

(SMO)

Sampler

Sampler

Joe Filosa

Joanne D'Onofrio

Region II START

Region II START

7. Additional Comments:

On 30 and 31 July 1997, the Region II Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team

(STARn collected soil/sediment and surface water samples from the Keegan Landfill site. These

samples were collected as part of a Site Inspection Prioritization (SIP). All samples were

collected by Region ITSTART and analyzed for Target Compound List (TCL) and Target Analyte

List (rAL), excluding cyanide, parameters through the U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program.

Organic and Inorganic Traffic Reports are attached.

A Sample Location Map will be prepared and submitted at a later date.

8. Report Prepared by: G~J j/ C~L{;-LJ

Gerald V. Gilliland, P.G.

1.2 /¥/c, 7

9. Report Approved by: ~{L.A..,L..I.;,::=:::rz~~~~1:7I..t'

W. S. Butterfield, CHM

Date:

TIERRA-A-017828
FIGURE 1

SITE LOCATION

MAP

"

.-----.. ".

6

HEW

JERSEY

QU~AANGL£LOCAnON

QUAO) ORANGE. N.J

--------Iw,

EPAPM

MOYIK

~~ Roy F. Weston, Inc.

L':L~~.~ FEDERAL PROGRAMS DIVISION

START PM

CAMPBELL

KEEGAN LANDFILL

KEARNY, NJ

IN ASSOClAllON wrTH RESOURCE AJlPUCAllON.Inc.

C.C. JOHNSON. MALHO'1'RA. P.C •• R.E. SARRIERA ASSOCIATES.

~C ENVIRONMENTAL MANAal:MENT. AND GAB ENVIRONMENTAl. SERVICES. INC.

I

.L

~~---

-..::..,--

KEEGAN.SIP TIERRA-A-017829
!

I

U/G~

• rJ8TE OR :!JOIL S.AJlPU lJ)CATION

• SUMJeZ FATER/SZDIJaNT

SAJIPU l/JCJ.TlON

A. :!JDIJaNr SAJiPU lI:JCA1'lDN

~ Roy F. Weston, Inc.

~ Fl:DERAL PROGRAWS DIVISION

.. ASIllCIA1IlII 11111 I'IIC a.-DfTAL .....,..acpsuf. IIlC..o

c.c. .DIIDI • IIMJGIU. ,.c.. IE3UlCE APl'UCA'lICIG. 1IIc..

It.£ Sl'lRIIIIItIl ABIlJA'n ANIlIlI!I ...-rIlL :lIER'llCa. IMe.

i.&.PP9DXDWI: s;:.&1Z)

700 C 700 5 1 I

1 lnclJ. • 700 :t.

nGURE 2 - s.ucP1B LOc.&.nON MAP

mEC.lN Lo\NDTIU.

DABKY. Nn JIR5EY

JULy 1'197

us ENVIRONlaNT.lI. PlWL£CtlOS AGENCY ----..ell _. -~_-.:-::::-

1"'>4 13toGJ.P'~tTIERRA-A-017830
TABLE 1

SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS

KEEGANLANDflLLSITE

KEARJ\.ry. 1''EW JERSEY

INORGANIC -I I

TThIE l

~

SAJ\1PLE ORGAA1C DATE

I

!\'1JMBER CLPNO. COMME!''TS CLPNO.

~

BSE41 -/ tvfBQK 46 17130/97 I

0935 Field Blank collected from bowl, trowel and j

dredge for su.,,"iace and subsu ..L1"acecol1ectlon. I

I FB-02

~

ESE 42

~

MBQK47 7/31/97 0935 Field Blank collected from bowl and trowel

I 7/30/97 1205 Sediment at head of Frank Creek. I

S00) I BSE 2' MBQK ::;4

': jl SO 0':; BSE 31 MEQK '8 1 7/30/97 I 1205 1 Dun 1iCllte of sn n I for QIVQC pu..r1Joses

II

- , .

-

I "/

[ -- -- - -- -- -

II SWOl ESE 22 J JvfBQK 29 1 7130/97 J 145 Surface waterlleacha!e at head ofFral'.K Creek

II

'I

SW05 I BSE26 I MEQK33 7/30/97 1145 "/ DUDlicate of SW O! for QAJQC purposes.

SD 02 BSE 28

~

MEOK 35 7130/97 1255 Frank Creek, downstream ed~e of site, MS/MSD. I I S'J: 02 BSE 23 MBQKJO 7/30/97 1240 Frank Creek, downstream ed!!e of sIte. MSIMSD I

I

II----:::..:.....:....-.J--.,;;;,.;;..=....:._,J G130/97

I' J] 7130/97

II I J 7/30/97

II J~~' 1_7....;;./3..;...Of9;,.,...7-+-~=--F......:...:.:..;..,,;:;.;,,:~ _

if ,17/31/97

il I

L? Ol 'ESE 3'7

ESE 38

MBQK44

LF 02 MEQK45

LF 03 MEQK 48

mOl

SD 06 BSE 32 MEQK39

/!

SO 03

~

ESE 29 MBQK36 7131/97 1055

I 5004

~

ESE 30 MEQK37 713]/97 I

1140 I

I' SD ](i I ESE 36 I ~1BQK 43 7/31 f9~ j 1335 Ii I

I

I SO 11 ESE 46 MEQK66 7/31/97 1315

I Wetland sediment sam;le

l Wetland sediment sample

! \l,'etland sediment sample.

5D 0R

~ . -

I, -

I

Ii SDrr ESE 33 MEQK40 7131/97 1253 Wetland sediment sample

II Sf..: 01 ESE 44 MEQK49 7/31/97 1555 Off-site back'uound soil sample.

I' CT""\ , .....

I

ESE 47 I MB-K 67 t 7/31/97 1540 Off-slle, background wetland sediment samole. "

,-~L..J l_

~>"B~l:,,~

I

r

I' ,,'l .~ r >:<,t; 4S< 17()n Off-s't ... barto/0nod ",ptland sediment sl''!1nle

i 7111 fQ~

I

ESE 34

ESE 3"

MBQK4l

:MBQK 42

1310 t Wetland sediment samole

1338 lWetland sediment sample

TIERRA-A-017831
ATTACHMENT

TRAFFIC REPORTS/CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDS

TIERRA-A-017832
. - - - --~-- '. -- --, _.~.. -~. -- --_ ..._,--_ .._-----,. _ ... _._,-,.- . .. -- .

Or ic Traffic Report Coso No.

, i\'II1IlCY & Ch~1I11of Custody Record

(For Org<lllic elf' Analysis) ~~OL _____.__

lplingCo. ~-~-'~~-----'L' ~~&;i3~\QJt carr:r:cO-L'i 6. Motrlx 7. Prosllrvotlvo

QSfllf1Sae\ (En/or (Enler In

Airbill Number

in Column A) Column 0)

_ .._/d[)jjO~245(01

1. Surlace WElter 1. HCI

2. Ground Wal~r 2. HNO:J

-

5. S;TO

3. leachale 3. NaHS04 ~tlj-. 'Jl'l\ hUlls\- Lf\\1) :::>0\- O'(\i)\'o!lI ~ 4. Field ac 4. H2SO4

5. Soli/Sedlmonl 5. Ice only

ellOI1 J7~,/)l\h sH'l.\'o~ Culkt c. . LEM I r I·Tolm 6. OIl.IHlgh only) 6. Other

. A )11 7. Waste (Spaclfy In

'A I~I~~1~~otQ.'GG rrlio I

bHlgh only) Coillmn 0)

EM O. Ihor (Spoclfy N. Nol

11 ~I--f [jiL.- In Column A) prosorved

I _O&M

:SJ NPLD ATTN: (~_\ \~K'~JJwv.j~j;r

-

F G H I J K

Regional Specific 51<111on Mo/O<lyl Corrospondlng S"rnplel Flold DC

Tmckin~ Number Locallon YearfTlmo ClP Inor!1Hnlc 111111<119QUllllllor

or Tag umbers Idenlilier Sample Samplo No. I D -IJIN'" 9· Bolla

- Collection [) .. o\lIiticelll

, n -n"1UI. I re.r.ttbm EVftI ::r~L:o:L.-11:1~-- _EP-lo\ ql?o~g~Llil3s

- • Uot • OC s.,,,,~,

f-~- JDf.?Q ~I!a. ~ L _

:~Olf>- 1!1 SDol_!1L'1OCIlIZn-< rDJ:QD~ .

']11" - :..02.cQ.- 028 S\\Cf) '113Q\~ill(.fi~Q\L3B L b~

j]\b-\:t: N)5 - 013 -5:ill.clI- J.L2lllq7 'JtJ.~ l'1lI3Q 'I:: 2( L ~ (.

:(4l \]~ J _..,j:l::. Q\g-=--O~Ltl.:bUlt 1.a3.1.1D5_1 30K1]-1~ .IYlelQ '( .33 _(l_. -.lJ __

tAb tl- 0.:;0 - ()~_ -Sf) 02. ~lrL\7.c:,.~ tQ~Q~ 3t) .- ~L[n:b

Jl(:lJtfl3:!~! __ ~ -213Q \ 2L\() .1))f)Q-'-..3ft - ~- -llliluLD

~~~b~ C:Jo~- 05_'J~_LE.O\ 11 Z::J2. \S<n rn~t....i:: '-. _ -- ..

--

~ i\t~·d: () P-A_ (')10 I --LE C5L ~ ~1Lll(q< l1lJ;Q-kJ}/

; ll-~ f){n?)- C<a5 i ~D~ rJ:!iL-J~ rJJ69"- ~&\... ~

lor laboratory ac Additional Sampler Signa lures Chain {; CU610dyS;;( Nllmbor(6)

P{,r 7 "!1

Recoived by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature)

Received for Labomtory by:

(Siana/ure) _____ .I_~ ~~_. __. J~ji_

Oato I Time

OISHlIOUIION: 01110' neglon Copy Pink· CLASS Copy

Whlle • Lob Copy lor Return 10 Roglon Yollow • Lib Copy lor Aolurn 10 CLASS

EPA Form 9ll0·2 SEE REVERSE FOR AOOITIOrlAL STAtIDAnO 1/161RUC IlotlS

'SEE flEVERSE FOR PURPOSE CODE OEFIIlIJlON9

372307

TIERRA-A-017833
---_._-----~---- --------~ -_._-_._------------

-

A.E~A Org ; Traffic Report

........ U"ilod Siains Ellvlrlllllllolllall"plCdlotl Agency & Ch.· f Cu t dy R c rd

....~~ , COlllrnr:\ lfllJOralo1Y rrogram a nos 0 e 0

,. , (For Organic CLP Analysis)

Case No.

25fJJOi

Non·Superlund Program

6. Matrix

(Enler

, In Column A)

1. Surlace Water

2. Ground Waler

3. Leachale

4. Field QC .

5. Soll/Sedlmenl

6. 011 (High only)

7. Wasle

(High only)

8. bther (Specify

, . In Column A)

7. Preservative

(Enler In: ,

Column OJ

1. Hel

2. HN03

3. NaHS04

4. H2S04 ,

5. Ice only.

6. Other ..

(Specify In

Column D)

N. Not

preserved

K

FleldOC

Qualiller

B.IlIor."'.S~

O.l!I4JI<:alo R.ANa,.

PE .""'bmEvoi

-. Hd. oc Sanpe

. .' CHAIf~ OF CUSTODY RECOA_D---: --.-- _

RciimllJ"shmii~y:'-is~i;;;~II;~;T-.-OnleJ 1illlo ~ Recolved by: (Signa/ure) noiinquishod by: (Signa/ure) I Dale I Time Recolvedby:(Sigllo/ure)--

~

'7/. I I .. ,'

--/:(~ILd. tL LU;))lr~--~l\~tJLlaXL ~ .-:;..;I' . -' _ __ 1__ -----~------~--. --

R Ii J(ll1isllen lJy (Si9l1illllltl Dale 11im~ Recoived by: (Signa/we) Relinquished by: (Signature) Dale /Time Received by: (5IOIl0IufO) .

'll I • (~.

i"'i;;"",i""i'Y•.~.(Si9'"'''~~--·_--_-_D~i-Ti'=_~~~;;~,~~JJ' LabmatmybY_D~'~LJ R,"",k'=:::Od~"~ ,",,,11YMhm"~ ::~---- - ~i

OIS1I1IEHll'otl: 1111",-llegioll Copy Pink· CLASS Copy

Willie. l,,1J Copy lor nellJfn 10 !legion Yellow - Lab Copy for nelllln 10 CLASS

SEE nEvF.nSE FOn AOOITIOtlAL STAtltlAflO illS I JHJC' lOllS

·SEE nEVEnSE FOn PUnpOSE CODE tlFrlfliflOrlS

3l? 3()~l

TIERRA-A-017834

ErA Form 9110·2
• _,. r __ r ,_. •

~ R~ anic Traffic Report

~ ~....,.. 11"llod ~Intns [nvl,0nmonlal I"olo<:llon Agency & I '. f C t d R d

~ ~ '_ Conl,act Lahoratory Prn!lr;lIll \Jllaln 0 US 0 Y ecor

~, _ (For Organic CLP Analysis)

l-l-.-r-'~-J!-Cl·-C~O-r1-0-__]~~~1Il1 Codo . ~ian N°'l:(;IqS~~' D;El;1q;~lcaF~(\ Ex

Reolonnlln1orrnnllon Sampler (Nama) Airbill Numher . ;

~_________ ' ~~6'C)\,\~J(' )5~bL)Lt'L q~b

':I Non-Suporfund rlO~Jlnm ,1~1~leLSiWHlili,e 5. Ship To \. ". ,I" v\ I '

d ~ ,.1 - \\ \I("\' \ ~~I: . ' ~)-I hW~~l- 'I-Jb'S (!f< or NlO()\(

:,;~s,,;·~. -- , 'lj"'po,,' '"I't'l"EM i%';" \loT) \J-'l 1-[\ trJJl\~,C\fljcb C, "

.j.;, _'~ _ ,~QQ~\L 1~Q!'D())LU_ r:'!~<lISF =~~M I' ~~ l~\JDYJjL OvV-(OW ()\~ ~qOI~

\': . CII~S'''ld - [SilO Splll~D I =~~P .~ ~I - 8~M I' " ,,':' I

~UfnfTh \~] _1--7_ ' - FED - E~I - NPLD _-~n~CJ\Ul\U1r:b\lQ.Cr-1~_;"··l_..,-_---rl

I" A [] C D E F G,' H· • ~' K

ClP Mnlrl~ Cone.: Somph Preser nAS Analysis ~ Regional Specific ' 'Station: MolOayl Sample' Field OC

Sarnple (lrom Low Typo: vatlve '('if rrr Trncking Numbor Loenlion YonrfTIme InitIals QUillifior

Numbers Bo~6) Mod Camp, (lrom « « 0 '11 or Tag NumbOls Irlcnlifier Sample, n.II""'" 5.51'''''

(IrOIl1 High Grab nOli 7) a z 11. _o~L. _. .' Collection n·ll\~bl.

, lab~ls) 011,., o~ > m ~ AnOI " '_'. r'E ~l;,,~.~'EvnI

I , ' iWl a.. lOX -.HaloeS",,,,"

,jJ.J~~g-5- J= I::'i. I Y.....Y-i:. ~-- ---l.&.\ 11LUi:I_~\2\2 fIL2l\l9...U2. ~IQ rnoor:;.k:-7~-~~

J.1SE.!±8_5.:.!=-G-_~-~,"'.:{:i_~( \lo- \,<;,~_ 50\7) , 21.3\\q]PQ-~f8-_~L_-

-:-v ~----;--- __ ' _- ; ~ -=-= ===r~L,-17(r-12'2'--- '-':B)ttJ2:- -d2-ll\Q-l--, ' .. -- , ~~

I; -" !.

,

.'

I'.;

".:~

.1

,"

I

'.

" .. !

~l,',I

. c' t.: I ~

Caso No.

6. Matrix

(Enler

In Column A)

1. Surface Waler

2. Ground Waler

3. Leuchale

4. Field ac

5. SolllSedlment

6.011 (High only)

,7. Waste

(High only)

8. Olher (Specify

,in Column A)

7. Pre serva live

(Enror in

Coillmn OJ

t. IICI

2.IIN03

3. NaHS04

4. H2S04

5. Ice only

6, Other

(Specify In

CO/11m" D)

N. No/

preserved

-

____________ - - --11------..:.._------1-------1--------1-------1-----1-----1

I

Corresponding

CLP InorganIc

Sample No.

Shipment lor~r,se

Complelo7 (&1

Additional Sampler Signatures Chain of Cuslody Seal Number(sl

, \

I'

Sample(s) to be Used lor Laboralory QC

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD i''''hy, (Sly"'''''''')

, Dale ITime Received by: (Signa/ure) nclinqulshed by: (Signature) Dale 1 Time Received by: (Signa/llfc)

'_.l~l' -'lidJ._ if. £1 I 15:0

~

n.1I ~""d~I!J''''''''.~

3\ -1

--oiiie1 Timo Recolved by: (Signalure) Relinquished by: (Signa lure) Dote 1 Time Recelvod by: (Signa/ure)

I I :I ' L ._--~----

Rollnqulsherlby: (SiglJalure) Date I Time Received lor Laboratory by: Dale I lime Rommks Is euslody 5eollnlocl7 Y/N/nono 1

~_________ L (Signature) ____ I 1

-

-------- -_._~------. --- -_._--

,i

Go

,-

OISTRIOUTlON: DIlle - neolon Copy Pink· CLASS Copy

Whllo • Leb Copy lor nelmn 10 Region Yollow· Lab Copy lor RclUr" 10 CLASS

EPA Form 9110·2 SEE REVEllSE FOn AIlOITIOUA'- STAtIOAflO HIS rnliCTlotlS

'SEE llEVEJlSE FOn "URrOSE CODE DEFililTlOflS

3 7 ~ 3·1 3

TIERRA-A-017835
- - .._-_. ----- ----~- -------~ -- ----,----~-- -----~-----

--------~----~-~ ------------------

o

gE~ Ii Ullilml Sialos [lIvlrollrnolllall'lOlQCIIOIl f\ljoncy 'r114 CunlracllnlJOralo,y PrO!Jlarn

,::;--;;---=- __ ----r:-:::c-:-=-7~-:r.::-"..:,---:-:--=--=:.:...:...=!..:.:.::.!.-----I----'~~~:...L--;-------1

1. Project Code , I Account Code

;, Regionallnformalion

I •

.: ~

~' .

" '

5. S~ To ; , \\ ' .

~.~ull:oUse~.~'~E.,.-l::tyc::!...lLE.b.!M~': ::::.\--,. ~, ~G1h~rta~,

~

lO.ds'r. . - ~~M ~~~' ~tiib L5 A' L~'2'(:.~05: - ~

_~.L-L.L-.~i_~~P .. ~I:' . ~~M' -.t'\Ll \\.U., : VJ() ,

FED ESI . NPLD ,ATTN:

ABC 10- ' .. ·F,'

Matrix Conc. Sample Preser ": ' Regional Specilic .

(Irol1l Low Type: .valivo " : Tracking Number,

Box 6) Mod or Tag Numbers

-- High '

OIlier:

.-' Non-Superfund Program

Sile Name

";rm~ . l'. 4-J.4-F-.J_~~~_--,.-L-::...:...,.-_--==":=~~9~~i----h..40~!o.!.L~-IH-J~-\-U~-;:a--,...-_-L_--.-------h--..------I

• .J.

: Sample

Numbers.

. (Irom

: ,labels)

Case No.

6. Matrix

. (Enler

in Column A)

. \'.

" ',,1. Surface Waler'

2. Ground Waler

3. Leachate

4. Field ac, :. '

5. Soli/Sediment

:,.6. Oil (High only)

: r: 7.Waste.(Hlg~ ..

.• , only) I' ",I '

", " 8. Other (specify.

,.: In Column-t')"

. I,r

., .

(Signa/ure) --------r------,-----=-------~

Relinquished by: (SigrJ.1/um) Dale I Time

~

\, \ liJ .~ I J 1Jn' ; _ j\j\'fb.i_h.~_\.L\r'-.J.12 7~ -' -_.~~--' ---

n .1 lqlJlSh~ hy: (Slg~liI/IIfI\) ." <JloI Tlmo f1ocoivod by: (Siglla/llfO)

~_'_._.. ~__~_~-_': L~ ;~.,~---:---:--I

flnlillquisllcd by: tS"l'JiI/11t0) Dalo I limo lIocolvod lor Laboralory by:

. (Sigrlil/lJre) :'", _______.. , ~ J _'; _---- __-..1_-

nocoived by:

H· .

MoiDayl

YearfTIme

Sample

. Collection:

, I

Corresponding

CLP Organic

,Sample No.

, ;:

7, Preservallve

(Enter .• ,

In Column OJ

1.HCI

2. HN03., ;:,':;

3. NaOH ' ;'.

4. H2S04

5. K2CR207 "

6. Ice only

7. Other (specify

In Column D)

N. Not preserved

'1' K

: FleidOC

auallller

._."k "fl.flfllke

o·Otlfllc.ol.

,,II.fllnt."

P2 • P'w_h,,"•. eul

- • Not • QC Bolnpll

Date /Tlme Recolved by: (Slgnalure)--'-'-

J "

Sample

:lnlllal8

Chain 01 Custody S~ol N;,1~~ber(s),

L

'. r ,:

, .

. . ,.",

----------1---,--- --- --.----~'~------

nollllquished by: (Signn/ure) Dole I ,limo Rocolved by: (Slgnaturo), :

__.L ~ ~__~L..WI

Is cuslody seallnlacl? Y/N/nono M

;',1

~:I

!/I

,

Dalel TIme Remarks

EPA Form 91TO-1 SEE nEVERSE ron AOOITIOlIAl SlAt/OAllO ltlSlnllCTIlHl9

015"'IlIIHIOII: 'SEE REVERSE rOR punpOSE CODE OHIIIHlorlS (;, non· 110glonCopy

Whlto • l.b Copy for nalurn lo Region

Pink - CLASS Copy

Yellow ·lab Copy lor Relurn 10 CLASS

~hr,Q1/'

TIERRA-A-017836
~ E:~~ G<lseNo.

UIIl1nd SI;lln, ""vIrOllUHlrl,aII'II1!oclIOll I\!loney 11101 lie Traffic Report

~~ . Conlrllcl Ln!JorlilolY I'lou,n", & Clla." of Custody Record "J_ ')-' "'01

, ~" (For Inorganic CLP Analysis) £- W ,

i~I';~j~ct ~orjo--ll\t~:fll ..;iCodo--- 2.'ne7~n-No.ls:~\~19 Co. 4. D<lt1oshiPpedlcarri~ d " '---1-6~.~M-al-rl-)(----"--:-----·'--

, __ • _~. .___ _ m __ CL.j_,-) Q.\\UQS\I',tD ..~~lL~__ l=R. EX ~%lg~rumnA)

· n"";",~""ro,m,"o" "3'"(N,,,nol. .., A1'bl" Nwnb", . :.

· . j~_o-\u;~y' \~/~)DO q'L 513 ~:~~~'~~~~:::~

Non-Superfund ProgrnlT1 S~'~.rl~r Sigl nlu,(S-" A. I . 5. ShIp To , . 3. Loachato

. i __ 3~ I~~~~~ t\;~~~t:- .5~Lnl\1U-\ ~ ilL" ~:~~\1S~£monl

, Silo Name '. l..~rl ~ ~kEM . I\cu°r-S ?- isoo ll)o.\\ct~t. 0.VZ~: ~~~~~1~i~~Y)

, _~~'Oi.LLL.J\ () \)<iLl 1 - SJtJ1·P

=IlEM ~RD 0l.l,J...b L3 ._. _ only)

I

FU RA \ \ \ Ul AI 3 -yO ~ 8, Olher (spocify

· Cr~' 8~ 0 _ Silo SI~IIID =~S~ :>< 51 =O&M n' u.n. u\ . l, n. -J. J 0 .J in Colullln A)

/1.)CLlUl\\ JJ L _._?-~~ .-. FEO_-=_~.~I NPLO 1\1 IN: llQJf.UJ\I.Jl118/ fl' - .' ' .-----~

CI.v 1\ 13 C D E - IlAS I\nal sls 1 F =:J,. . G II I J I(

'. Sample Mnlrix Cone, ~<lrnpl.cPr.(!~er - - - [, ... -H11lh . ROrJionnlSpcr.ilic ,"Slali~)rl Mo/Dayl Corresponcllng Snrnplo : Flold QC

. Numhms (hom Low Type. v.lllve !'! -@ _oldY- ~n!L. " .1 rack,oclNumbor Locallon Year(Timo GLP OrganIc Inill[lls Quntillor

: (110111 Om( G) Mod COI~l~1 \holTl ~ ]I .~ on .. : tl . or Tag NlIlI1bOf~ Identifior Snmple· Sample No. \. Dln,.k 9. ~I'''"

Inbels) -_. IIlgh G'<1 .~!?~ --; ::c ~ 1? fi Colleclion i : '. ;. °r...I:\',~':~:~'

Olhor . OUWf:' ~ ~ !2. 0~ g i 8l:; r re III r.llorm Ell"'

1 1___ 0 t- 0 Z rr: a. - ..NnlI0CB'1I1 I

p

1

.;=~I~~~. ttJ-,~_==~iir~¥ ~~!=llf~-;t-. 5_

.~m,oo.rJ· r,~:)L J.:r- -LL-I~__ . .'TAb-J± OB'I sf)o-\ ~1~~\911Jl\(j /3SE tit) i .

~ J1tDL\-ILJE-3 _L JlL ~.to__I~ _ _ . '~"-GM;:dt- N=\ I -.SbJCL-1W9712115' 1!J~:=.2ip J..I\=-:""I I

-ll:..\~Q.\L~ -:S- .L.Li- __LL _ I{ -:-~G&bH 095-- ~~ ILti'I";\\l~3J£ -JR~U/~- - ;-- -' '--

· r<\~(.\. 0/ LIe r.:.:. L~' '/ ~ t .' ~-Ji) H (\q q: :-1\) (')1 hr:;;\~nOt;1. '10,SY-i? - -~ L1..1.1..2.4'''"L----r:- -L -~- ---- :t:t '"" -- J~----l

.~~~Jj.~ .. _ ' ~]~-0-----~Jti.? \03 ~~'JJIW31b_BSED~L-"J- __ --1

r rY){)~If~~123- L (:;-.iu__ "f\ ~ ---Ql-s\:t lO, :>OtH .llili9-' )'llj -V\~ ,~s ; L :. ~:;:'

hloo.i..Hq ~' . L v:; to ~ : "::Jl1r-.r,t:f:. , \ I "V-J<",' t1.3l\QlI.9K' 'Pt<)~ LW '\( ", I

Shlpmonllor lIse..G ! Page I SafTlpla(s)10 be Used lor Laboralory ac AdditionaTSampler SlgnalureJ - Chain of Cuslody Seal Number(s)

Complete? (1.t£N) I I .: I). ., ." • .. ,. , :

__ of _lX.._" ':"

I

7. Proservatlve

(Entor '

III Column D)

I.HCI

2. HN03 .

3. NaOH·

4. H2S0,,'

, 5. K2CA207 •

6. Ice only ,

7. Olhor (SPOcir

in COIIlIIIII D

N. Nol presorvod

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

tlIrO) Oalo ITime Recoll/ed by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signa/ure) Dalo/,Time Received by: (Slgna/uro) w

tlh\~I'WJ ..

1 r

,

Lt,~_ I

r

,

I

fllrd) . ' nlo I Tlmo Recolved by: (Signa/ura) Rolinqulshed by: (Slgno/u/O) Dale I 11me Roceivod by: (SlpflllltJfO)

.'-. I ~

.' . !-..J

,

II .~_l ,

i

,

, .'

_'_~J ___ I ,

----

---t ----

11110) Dale I Timo Rocolved lor Laboratory by: Dale I lime Remarks Is cuslody seal inlact? Y/N/nono

i

,

(Signa/ure)

,

I I .._- ----,-_.- ~ . --*--

Relinquished by: (5;gll.1

I-+\~\:{\J\i.J:=Q ,1,

Ro n IlIlshottby: (Slgilil

Relinquished hy: (S'U""

SEE flEVEflSE FOR AIlDITIOflAL STAtllJAIlD 1r1SI "lie 1I0llS

'SEE REVERSE FOR PURPOSE CODE DHINITlotlS DISTllIOUTlDr1: Groen. neolon Copy Plnll • CLASS Copy

WhIle. Lab Copy lor Aolurn 10 Region Yellow ·lab Copy for Return to CLASS

EPA Form 9110·1

I

!

",.

~iI

M'

~,

I;i f I

~'

I

:1RG927

TIERRA-A-017837
- - -_ .. --- -----~--- _._-- ~E A' Inorc c Traffic Report

~ . ~ U""od [,1;\105Ellvlrtllllll0Pllrli f'rolor.ll(lO /I[loney & CI ~ f' C t d R d

...~~ • Cunllnct LnlJOIatory !'Iog""n '1 lan • ..J us 0 y ecor

", (For Inorganic CLP Analysis)

GlISO No.

l. Project C9do I Accounl Codo

Rogionallnlorrnalion

i Non-.superfund Program

.'

6. Matrix

(Enter

In Column A)

1. Surface Water

2. Ground Water

. 3. Leachate

4. Field ac

: 5. SolVSedlmenl

: " 6. 011 (High only)

" ,·7. Wasle(Hlg~. I

: ,only).,.

, B. Other (specify,

in Column A) "

,,'

7. Preservative

(En/er r,

In Column D)

tHel '

2.t1N03, ,-',

3, NaOH .

4. H2S04

5. K2CR20i".'

6.lc8 only ,

7. Olher (SP6cir

In Column D

N. Nol preserved

f'

"': C~ A' BCD E-RASAnal~sls': ~""; ~ ,0.. ,; G

. ,Samplo Malrlx Cone. Sample Pro~er low ,Hlah ..1: Regional Specilic ," .. Slation

" ~:Numbers (/rom Low Type: :vallve ~ '" 001... 0 iJy , • Tracking Number Location

:' . (from Box 6) Mod Comp.!· "rom OJ -; II> 0' II> tl or Tag Numbers; Identiller

.. labels) High Grab ~ ::E ::E ~ ~ 1? ~ :

, I Other. " 'Other: ~ 1! l!. 0 g ,.

, a ~ 6- z u: a .

I-~-:"--"':-'I-=---I

'ffi~K.(n'J:~ L (J la--X--' ./ ,1 ~b"'llr\. \T~

, .f1\<?JQx:.\o9 ~ __k-_ --.1.L.... JLL. _ ~ .' .. - 'iT NO IIq

'::ro~~ ~ --/~::ts:-l& ~ i. "-' =f.A6--NQ-- \2.3

~ . ~

• ,,'."H· ''','

" MoJDayl "

, Yearmmo,

Sample "

, Colleclion '

fj I

t

,

,

I

i

. .'

I

,

"

:

,

..

,

, . "l

I ~~

!

~

I I

I

I

I

I

I J"

Sample

Inillals

, K

Field QC

Qualllier

I

Corresponding

CLPOrganlc

Sample No.

I i ~ - - - - _1--1- __ ,...- + ----11 1 1

Shipmon\ lor,C.aso

Comploto? (JJN)

I

Addilional Sampler Signatures

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

/10) Dale I Time Received ~y: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signa/ure) Dale I Time Recolved

~~Ld- q/3\~.Jl )&30 :

I

IrO) Onte I Tlmo Received by: (Signa/ure) Relinquished by: (Signa/ure) Dale ITlme Recolvo

_, __ I

----

, L

. Rccp.ivad lor Laboratory by: 11.'-') Dnle Ilimo Dale ITime Remarks Is cuslody seal inlact? VINlno

I

I

(Sigtliltllrs) , ,

; ,,

J :.1

---

-

.-

nelinquishcd by: (5'9",1/'

'-------_.- O' .. - __ ._. __

d by: (5Ignll/llr~), , '

no

.' "

EI"A Form 9110·1 SEE REVERSE FOR ADDITIONAL STAt/OAlm 1N9TnUclI0t1S

'SEE IlEVEASE Fon punpOSE CODE DErIlHTlOIIS DISTAlllUTIOtl: Oreon • 110010n Copy Pink· CLASS Copy

Whllo • Lob Copy tor RolUrn 10 noglon Yollow • Lib Copy lor Rot urn 10 CLASS

3G6928

TIERRA-A-017838
u.s. EPA CLP

DATA PACKAGE -

TARGET COMPOUND LIST

TIERRA-A-017839
OTfffiR ANAL Y'lES WUKK 'Jj..BLE

Project: Keegan Landfill Site

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997

IDilution Factor

IChloromethane

IBromomethane

u

u

START PM: Gerry Gilliland

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (~a/Kg)

1.0 1.0 1.0

u

u J

•• V

u

u

J

J

J

J

J

u J

~

I:yola~es .

Method Soil Soil I Soil

I

Soil I Soil i Soil

Detection BSE46RE BSE47

,

BSE48 BSE27 - - BSE28 I

BSE29

Limit S0412.10RA 30388.04

I _

ILow concentranon 30412.11 30412.12 I 303880) 30'+1:.01

IP~rc~nt ~re 66 64 76 52 ' 48 I

32

.,.. 1 n LO

u J

u J

u

u

J

J

u

u

u

u

u

J

J

J

J

J

u J I 16 J , u J

u J u J u J

u J u J I

u

u

J 1

J

u

u

J

J

u

u

J i

J

u

u J

u

J 76 U J 100 J u J u J

u J

J u J U J u J

u J U

J u J u J u J u J

1 ·,Lni ....hil""llr~thA"D Itnt,.n IIt"-...,J .. 111 .... '_ .... _ ••• ''"--"1 u J

u J

U u J J U J u J

u J

u J U J U J ' u J U

u u J U J u J u J '

Chloroform 11 ..'-ni,.. ....I,."r,..t"-~". I'."""-_1 ....' "'W'I ...~u ...... -

u

u

u

J

J

J

U

u

~ I

u

30

u

J

J

J

U

26

u

J

J

J

u

u

u

J

J i

J I

u

u J :

Icarbon Tetrachloride

IBromodich!orometl\ane

u J u

J u J u j J u

, .

oJ I

u

u

J I

J

J i

101 u J u

J u J u J u J u .:

Hid

101

1C~

101 u J

J

J

J

u

u

u

U

u

u

u

J

J

J

U

U

U

J

J

J

u

u

u

J

j ;

11,1.2-Trichloroethane I

~ I

10 U J I u J

I

u J i U J i u

,

i U J I

"

rBenzene I

1(1 U J I u J I u j

I U J I U J i U j !

Itrans-1,3-Dichloropropene I HI U J I

U J I U J I u J I u J i u J I

r f

., II I

"

I I

IDibromochloromethane I

u

U J !

II..,

U J I U

II I .., ... I U

II I .., ... U

"

I

.., ... I U

U J i U

"

I

i "

u ... ....

U J i

II

"

U J I U

u

u

u

1c~1 u J

u

J I

u

u

J J

R

u

J I

J I

U

U

u u

j

j I

10

U

U

u

III

10

u

u

u

J

J

J

. 1() u J U

U

U

u

U • non-detected compound

B • compound detected in the associated Method Blank

J • estimated value

IN - presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R - rejected compound

u

u

j

" I

u

..,

J

J I

J

J

I ,

v I

J I

J I

J j

J i

J i

u

U J

U

j

I

'"

U J

II J I

-

~

8 J I

u J I

U .I .

3 J

I

I

4 J I

J

u

u

, ,

j J

u

U J

u J

U J

i

U J

i

!

U J i

u J i

U J I

U J

I

TIERRA-A-017840
o rHER Ai'fAL Y rE~ WORK 1'1~L1:,

Project: Keegan Landfill Site

START PM: Gerry Gilliland

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31,1997 S.A.r.API F #/CONCENTRATION (1J9/Kg) ... -- .. - - -

IVOlatile~

IMethod Soil I

Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Detection BSE30 ESE31 BSE32 BSE33 ESE34 ESE35

ILow Ccncentration -iLimit 30412.02 30388.06 30412.03 30412.04 30412.05 3041206 I

IPercent Moisture

24 T7 90

I

60 59

BS I

I Dilution Factor i ." 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I

..'"

r Chloromethane

.,,, U J : U J U J U J U J I u

I

'VI

J

IBromomethane I

101 U J U J I u J U J U J U j

,

I

I

... _, ,

lVl J u J u u u u J I

-

I

~hloroethane iOI U

i

, U J U J U J I u J U J

1

'"

I

lMethylene Chloride I 101 3 J I U J U J U J 10 J 8 J

iAcetone -I ..n ~ U J

I 81 J 130 J U J 660 ,I 230U J

IVI ,

ICarbon Uisuifide 101 U J I u J U J U J 19 ,I I u J

11,1-UiChioroe~hene I

10 1 U J ! U ,I U ,I U J U J I

lJ j

.",

[VmYl Chlonde

11,1-Ulcnloroetnane ''''I u J ' u ,I lJ J u J u J u

II,Z-Dichioroethene (tot"l)

i-,.2-Dlchloroethane

I

w

I 10: U J U ,I I u J I u j U J I

II J

,

V

,

,2-8ute;rione I 10, U J I U J I

41 J I u J 200 J I U J

I

I

11.1,1- Trich!oroethane ! 10 ! U J i U J I u J I u J U J i

"v J

i Carbon Tetrach!oride I

10; U J i U J I u ,I I U J U J

, U J

I

I

I Bromodichlorometnane I

10: U J I U ,I I U J U J U

I U J

'"

I

11 ?nit':hlorocrooane I 10; U J I U J I U ,I U J U J I u J

\c;~..1,i--Dlchior~propene !

10, U J I U ,I I LJ j U

I U JI U J

"

I

ITrichloroetnene I 10! U J I U ,I U J U J U

I

I u J

'"

I Dibromocn!oromethane ! 10' U ,I I U ,I U ,I U J U ,I I u J

I',1.2-Tnchloroethane i 10 U J D J U j

I U J

II J U J .... I

IBenzene I

101 U J I U J U J I

II J U J I U ,I

.... 1

i trans-l .3-Dlchloropropene I

10 U J U j

"

I

I u J u J I U J

v

"

~Bromoform I

10 U J

, U J

, U J "

J U J ! u J

I

'"'

14-Metnyl-2-Pentanone I 10 U J I U J U J

I U J U J I U J

I

;2·Hexanone ! 10 U J U j

II I I U J U J ! U J

'"' "

IT etrachloroethene I 10, U J I U J U J U J U J I U J

I

! 1,1 ,2.2-Tetrachloroethane I 10~ U J I U J I U ,I U ,I U ,I I

12 J

iTOlUene I 10: 4 J I U J U J I u ,I U J I U J

.~ , , i

in!

IVI u J ! u J U J u J u J u

10' U ,I U J U J U ,I u J u ; i

ICnlorobenzene

I Ethylbenzene U ,I u

u

U

J

J

u

u

,I

J

140

U

J

J

u

U

,I

J

IV,

10 i

'" i u

10; u J u u J U J u J U J

ITotal Xylenes u J I u J I u u J u J U J

U - non-detected compound

B - compound detected in the associated Metnod Blank

J - estimated value

,IN _ presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R - rejected compoul'ld

r.:r;

j

TIERRA-A-017841
OTHER ANAL VIES \VURK TABLE

Project: Keegan Landfill Site

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997

r I.U

IClilOioetha."1.

Methylene Chloride

START PM: Gerry Gilliland

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (iJo/Kg)

~

u

1 I

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

u

1.0 r 1.0

u J

-

Method Soil Soil Soil Soil I Soil

,

Volatiles Detection BSE36RE ESE37 - - -BSE38 BSE43RE BSE44RE I

Low Concentration Limit 30412.07RA 30388.07 30388.08 0388.11RA ....0412.09Ri\.

,

Percent Moisture 60 40 53 21 21

I

• n 'I t'l 10

u J I

u u J

~ I

J

u

u

u

u

u

u

J I u

J I

J I u

u

u

u

101 u

IAeetoiie

u

~I u

10\ U

101 u

u

101 u

u J I

j ~;;- ~;Di~;;~;;p~oPene

Trichloroethene

Dibromoehloromethane

11,1,2-TriChlaroethane

101 u

10 u

10 U

101 U

u

u ~ I

!Benzene

J

J I

J I

J I

u

u

o J I

u

u J [

u J

u j I

u J 1

u J

u J I

u

u J

u J [ u J

U J I u J

u

u j i

u

u

J

J

u

u·

u

J I

J I

j I

u J i

u

I

J I

u

, .

oJ ,

u

u

j II

J II

u

u

u

J

J

u

u

J I

j 1

J

u J

u j I

u J

u J I

u j

u J I

J !

u J

u

u J

u J

u J

u

u

,

oJ I

J

101 u

u J

u J u J

I~Methyl·2-Pentanone u

u J i u J

12-Hexanone

u J i

u J u J

ITetrachloroethene J I

u J u J

r Chlorobenzene .. u J I

11,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane ~ I u J I

7 J u J

IToluene ... u J I

u J

IEthylbenzene

U • non-detected compound

B - compound detected in the associated Method Blank

J • estimated value

IN - presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R • rejected compound

J I

~ jl-_-;:.,..---=;..... 1--...... ----+---;;;-----.-+--77--.....:,..---+------ u

u

u

~ 1

u u J

u J

u J

u J

u

u

J

J

TIERRA-A-017842
OllIER A...~AL\~fES V/OFJ:.:.TAaI..E

Project: Keegan Landfill Site

'3mpling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997

IChlorcmetnane

IMetnytene l,;nlonce

START PM: Gerry Gilliland

~AMPII= #/CONCENTRATION (~g/L)

u I I u J I u J u J u J I u J I

_..- ....... - ...

i Method I

Water

I

Water Water Water Water Water

,

!Volatiles Detection I

BSE22 BSE23 BSE26 BSE39 BSE41 BSE42 i

iLow Concentration Limit

i

30388.01

I

30388.02 30388.03 30388.09 30388.10 30412.08

IPercent MOisture I

. - - - - -

I DilutionFactor

.,., 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 :

I

I

l.V

, -

-

IBremomethane 1Ci II J I U J U J i u J I u J I U J i

'"

['lIny! Chloride

..... , II J

I U J U J I u J I u J I U J !

'VI

'"

I

IChloroethane 101 U J I u J U J U J U J i u J

i

-, . .. i u J u J u ~ I 10

u

10 J u J

u u J u 3 J 5 J

101 u J !u J u J u J I u u J u J

i1,l-Dichioroethenc

10:

J I

u J u J u J ~U u J I

.- .

!t'i3I"1I 1,2...Dichloroethene S !

10' U J I U J I U J I u J U J I U J

i

IChlOioform I 10 U J U J I u J J

:3 j ;) J i u

, I

I

... i

j' t2 ..Dich~oroethane i 10: U J i U J I u J I u J U J I U J I

i2-Butanone I 10, U J I U J I u J I u j U J

I

u

I I

"

r 1.1.1- Trichloroethane I 10 U J I u J I u J U J U J U J

I

iCamen T etrach!oride I

10i U J I u J I u J U J U J

,

U J

I

I

IBromodich!oromethane I 10 ~ U J I U J I u J U j U J

I u J

11.2-Dich!oropropane !

101 U J I U J I u J I u J , U J i U J

I

!cis-1 .3-Dich!Oropropene ! 10: U J I U J T u J I u j

I

u J ;1 U J

I

!

fT richloroethene I

101 U J I u J I U J

I

2

j U J

I U JI

I

,

.. \I

\1,1 ..Dichloroethane

10· ICi=r1 2-Dichlof'-"O;thene

IDltlromochloromethane 10

u J u J u

u J u J u

u J u J u

ms-l ,3·Dlchlcropropene 10 J

.1,1.2- Trichloroethane

~enzene

10.

10

U

LJ

J I

J

u

u

J

J

u

u u J

U J

U J

II I

'" ...

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

\I ,

'" oJ

U J

U J

U J

.cromoform 10 u J U J

U J

U j

U j

U J

U

I

"

U J

U

,

"

U J

"

J

'"

,2-Hexanone

10

10

u

u

J

J

4-Methyl-2·Pentancne 10

10

ITetrachlcroethene

,1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane

10 :ICluene

:CnJorotienzene

IEtJiylbenzene

10:

10

J

J

:StyTene

ITotal Xylenes

E - Concentration exceed Ihe calibration range

U - non-detected compound

S • compound detected in the associaled Method Blank

J - estimated value

IN - oresumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

q - rejected compound

u J I

u J

U J i

U j

I

U J i

U J !

u J

i

J I U

J I U j I

u

u ~ I

u J

u J I

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u J

u J

J

u J U

.! U

J u

J U

J U

J U

J U

J U

J U

J U

J U

J U

J U

u

u

u

u

u

u

U

u

u

u

U

U

u

u J

u

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

TIERRA-A-017843
oniliR ~AL YfES 1VORK TA"!3LE

Project: Keegan Landfill Site START PM: Gerry Gilliland

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997

1

1 ,4= Dichlorober2ene

.. ~ ,...~_...I_ .._~ .... afta 11.~·L.lU"''''''''I'''''''I'''~''5

!2.Z -oxybis(1-Chloropropane)

!~Meth)1phen~

!N~Nitroso-d~n--propytamjne

J I

J 1

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION ()Jg/Ko)

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

J

J

J

J

u

~ I u

u J 520 J

u

u

u

J I

J I

u

u

J

J

J

J

J

u

u

u

u

u

u

-

Method Soil Soil Soil Soil I

Soil , SO\;

1 Semi- Volatiles Detection BSE46 BSE47 BSE48 BSE27 BSE28 ! BSE29 i

ILow Concentration Limit - -30412.10 30412.11 30412-12 30388.04 3038805 I 304]201

[~~rc.ent ~oi~ture 66 64 76 52 46 I

32 I

IUlIUtIOnr aClOi' 1.0 I

, .0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ! 1.0

....~

!Hexachloroethane

INitrobenzene

!lsophorone

:2-Nitrophenol

i 2. 4-Dimethytphenol

I bio;;O.ChlorOfl!lhoxvlmethane i;:~Di~hi~~~Phe-~', .

330

J i u J I

11,2,4-T richlorobenzene

u

u

u

u

u

u

INaDhthalene u

J I u J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

J

J

u

u

J

J i

J

J

u

u

J

J

u

u

u

58

u

u

u

u

200

u

u

u J I

u

u

u

u

u u .,J : J u

J

J

u

u

J

J i

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J I

J f

J I

J !

J I

J I

J

-

I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

j

I

I

J

I

J

J

J

J

u J u

J

J u J '

u

u

u

J

J

J

u

u J I

u

J u J

J u J J

u u

u J I

u J u J

u J I u

J

u u

J

j

J u

J

u J u J

u J u J u J

u u J u J

J u J

J

u u

i 4-Chloroaniline u

~ I

J

j I u J ,

I Hexachlorobutadiene 330 u

~ I

u u J I u

u

i2·Melhylnaphlhalene J I u ,J i

!4-Chloro-3-melhylphenol 330 u u j i u J i J I u

330 u J I u J I 42 u

8301 u J I

330

330

u

u

J I

J I

J i

u

u

j I

J i

u

u

j I

J I

u

u

..I I

J I

,2,4,5· Tnchlorophenol

j i u J i

u J I u j I u J i u J i

,2·Chloronaphthalene 330 u J 1 u J I u J i u

:Dlmethylphlhalale ,; i u J I

:2·NilroanHine 830 u J I u J I u J i u J I u J I

'330 u J I u J i u j i u

;Acenaphlhylene 330 u

~ I u J I

j i

u J I 97 J I u j i

i 2.5-Dinitrololuene 330 u u u J I u J i u J ,

J I

J i

u J 'I

J I

I3-Nilroaniline 830, u J I

u

j I

u J i u J l u J 1

IAcenaph!hene

g-4-Dinltrophenol

~I u

~I

210

U

u

u

I4-Nitrophenol

;Dibenzofuran

!2.4-Dinitrotoluene

I

T

530 1

~!I

:1

U

100

U

u

U

U

J I

J I

J I

u

"u

U

U

DlethYlphthalate

j i

u u j I u

85 J I

i30

J I u

j

J

J

u

u

u

u

U

44 u

u

J I u

u J u

I4-Chlorophenyl-pheny1ether

•• values transferred from Ihe dilution analysis

U • non-detected compound

6 • detected in the corresponding method blank

J • estimated value

IN • presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R - rejected compound

u u J I u

u J u

u J u J u J

TIERRA-A-017844
01':l.UR .~AL-{TES'.vORK TABLE

Project: Keegan Landfill Site START PM: Gerry Gilliland

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (~g/Kg)

,

IMethOd I

Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

iSemi·Volati1es Detection! BSE46 BSE47 BSE48 BSE27 BSE28 BS::::29

:Low Concentration ,Limit I

30412,10 30412,11 30412,12 30388,04 30388,05 30412,01

I Percent MOisture 66 64 76 J

52 48 :32

J DilLJtion Factor I ! 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

jFlucrene 330: 230 J 47 J U J I 92 J 79 J U J I

14-Nrtroanillne ... 630: U J U J U J I u J U J

I U J

i 4,6-Dinitro-2.methy1phenol 6301 U J U J U J i u J U J i U J

rN-Nrtrosodiphenylamine 330, U J U J U J I u J U J U J

,

i4-Bromop heny1-phenyl ether 330, U J U J U J

i

U J U

I U J

I

~

IHexachlorobenzene 330i U J U J U J I U J "

L U J

" '"

f Pentachlorophenol 8301 U J U J U J i "

J U J U J

lJ

I Pnenanthrene 330: 3100 J ! 610 J U J i

....,"" J 840 J 34G J

.,,""

Anthracene 330 750 J 170 J u J I 240 J 230 J 10e j

iCaroazole 330 430 J ! U J U J I 150 J 150 J U j

,D~n-outylphthalate 330; 580 J U J U J I 730 J 150 J I 160 J

Irluorantnene 330 5800 J 1100 J 390 J I 2000 J 1700 J 500 I

~

,Fyrene 330 6000 J 1100 J 380 J ! 2200 J 1800 j

I 820 J

i 5wtylbenz lphthalate y 330 1900 J 230 J 120 J I U J 700 J i 580 J

:3.3- Dichlorober~idine 330 U J ! U J U J I u J U J U J

i 5enzo(a)anthracene 330 3200 J 590 J 220 J I 1100 J 940 J 4bo J

~Cnrysene 330: 3700 J 660 J 280 J

I

1200 J 1200 J 420 J

!c,s(2 -Ethylhexyl)phtnalate 330 6300 BJ ; U J U J 490 ·9200 J 1400 U J

;Oi-n-oclylphthalate 330 220 ! U J U J I u i;0 J U J

6er.zo(b)fluoranthene 330: 3200 I 570 J 250 j

i

;000 J .."" J I IU\J .,"/"1 .....v J

6enzo(k)fluoranthene 330 2800 J 470 J 190 J i

"",/"1 I 1100 J 320 J

""" .-

... 6enzo{a)pyrene 330 3300 J 640 J 260 J I

1000 J 1200 J 420 J

Inceno(1,2,~d)pyrene 330 2~O J 440 J 180 J "0" J 920 J 300 J I'JV

C' :~er\Z(a,h )antnracene 330 950 J 150 J U J 250 J 370 J 130 J

:e,.z0tg ,h,IJperylene 33C 30:]0 J 550 J 230 J 880 J 1200 J 330 J

•• values transferred from the dilu1ion analysis

U - non-detected comoound

B - detected in the corresponding method blank

J • estimated vaiue

IN • presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R • rejected compound

TIERRA-A-017845
OTHER A-l'fALflE~\VORK TABi.E

project: Keegan Landfill Site START PM: Gerry Gilliland

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997 SAMPLE #/CONC>==NTKA .... TION (u::/KJ' - -

ISemi- Volatiles

Method Soil Ii Soil Soil

!

Sail I Sail ::,(;~~

i

Detection BSE30 t BSE31 BSE32

i

BSE33 , BSE34 ES~;5 I

ILow Cencentration Limit 30412.02 i' 30388.06 30412.03 30412.04 30412.05 I

30~ 1206

[Percent Moisture 60 ',' 59 24 T7 90 &:

.- 1.1'1 1.0 <

1.0 1,0 ..0 lDilutIon Factor I I u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

U

70

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

.-~'ov

U

u

:

u

u

u

u

J

J

l.V

i

t

!

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U j

U j

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

II J

'"

II J

'"

U J

II I

'" ...

II I

... ...

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

r

!

IHexachlorobutadiene 3301

•• values transferred from the dilution analysis

U - non-detected compound

B - detected in the corresponding method blank

J - estimated value

IN - presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R • rejected compound

I

I

I

u

u

u

U

88

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

600

u

u

u

230

u

u

u

u

u

u

420

U

U

701""1 ."'''''

u

u

520

II

1400

u

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

.i I

J I

J I

J I

J !

J I

J I

J i

J i

J I

J I

J

J

J I

J

J

J

J

J

J

J I

J ,

~ I

J !

JS I

,

- I

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

J ,

J

J

J

J

J

J I

J

J !

J

J

J ,

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J '

J

J

J

oJ I u

u

u

u

u

u

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

u J

u J I

u

u J

u

u J

u J

u

u

u

J

u J

u J

u

u

u

,

-

.'

u J

u

, , ~ ,

u

u

J

J ,

u

U

tJ

_ I

J

J

J I

II

U

J

J

u

u

u

u

J

.i

j

J

u j

u

TIERRA-A-017846
Project: Keegan Landfill Site START PM: Gerry Gilliland

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997 SAMPLE #/CONCENTRAT10N (~a/Kg) ~

I}.,lethod Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil I Soi;

Scrni- Volatiles Detection BSE30 BSE31 BSE32 BSE33 BSE3~ 1 BSE35 :

Low Concentration Limit 30~ 12.02 30388.06 30412.03 30412.04 30412.05 I

30~12,O6

Percent MOlsture 60 59 24 n 90 I BS

Dilution Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I

, 1.0 ,

Fll.:orene 330 140 J I 150 J I U J 880 J U J I U J

I

14-Nltroaniline I 8301 U J i U J U J I u J I u J I U j

14.6-Dmitro-2-methylphenol 830; U J I U J I U J U J U J I U J

IN-Nitrosodiphenylamme 330: U J I U J U J U J U J I U J i

14-Bromophenyl-phenylether I 330; U J : U J U J U J U J I U J I

IHexachloroben.zene 330; U J I u J U J U J U J I u J I

1 Pentachlorophenol 830' U J ! U J U J I u J U J i U J I

i Phenanthrene I 330; 1600 J I 2000 J I U J 8000 J U J 1 U J ,

IAntnracene I

330, 400 J ! 420 J I u J 2300 J U J ; U J 1

:Caroazole 330 160 J 1 270 J i U J 1000 J U J ! U J

,

;DI-n-bulylpntt1alate I 330 U J i 1100 J

, U J ·14000 J U J I U J I

,

,Fluoranthene I 330 2100 J : 2900 J i U J I

"14000 J U J I U J

,

I Pyrene I 330 2200 J 3000 J I U J "13000 J U J I U J I

I

!61.:tylbenzylphthalale I 330, 2600 J

, U J ! U J 7800 J I U J I 180 J i

13.3-Dlchloroben.zidme I 330: U J I U J I U J U J U J I U J I

i 3en.zo(alanthracene I 330, 1100 J I 1600 J I U J I 6800 J U J I U J i

;Cnrysene I 330 1100 j I 1800 j

I U J 6900 J U J i u j

I

Ibls(2-Etnylhexyl)phthalate I

330, ·,5000 j

, 660 J I U J I

"28000 J U J I 3600 U J :

,

,DI-n-oclylphthalate I

330 U J I U J I U J 260 j U J I U J

!

:6en.zo(b)fluoranthene I 330: 790 J I 1600 J I U J 5300 J U J I u J

:Ben.zo(k)fluoranthene i 330 800 J

, 1300 J i U J

I 6600 J U J I U J I

I

! 5er..zo(a)pyrene I 3301 1000 J 1600 J I

190 J I 7400 J U J I 210 J I

Ir.::eno( 1.2,3·cd)pyrene :330 sse J 1200 J U J I 4800 J U J ! U J I

,D:~e:1Zla,h)anthracene , 330 290 j 500 J I U J 1900 J U J i U J i

2en.zo(g .h,l)perylene I 330 570 .) 1400 J I U J I 5500 J U J I U J I

I

•• values transferred from the dilution analysis

U • non-detected compound

E - detected in the corresponding method blank

J • estimated value

IN • presumptive evidence of a compound

e~an estimated value

R - rejected compound

TIERRA-A-017847
a·IllER Al ~:\T:o;r rrs "NC~U<TABLE

Project:· Keegan Landfill Site

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31,1997

u J

START PM: Gerry Gilliland

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (ue/Ka)

u J U J I U J U J i

_. ,. - - --

ISexni- Volatiles

Method Soil Soil Soil ;

Soil I Soil

, I

I

Detection BSE36 BSE37 BSE38 , BSE43 BSE-i-l

, I ;

Low Concentration Limit 30412.07 30388.07 30388.08 I

30388.11 1 30~ 12.09 j

Percent Moisture 60 40 53 I

21 I 21

Dilution Factor 10.0 I

1.0 1.0 ! 1.0 I '.0

lpn~~o~ ..

...." U J

I U J U J ! 260 J I U J I

--- I L

• _ ......... ~_& ... _-

u J I

u J

U J

U J

U J

U J !

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J I

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J I

U J i

u J

U J !

U J

U J

U J !

U J

U J !

U J

U J

U J I

U J I

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U j

U J

!2-Chiorophenoi

1,,3-Dicnlcrobenzene

'1 ,2-Dieh;orober~ene

12-Metrfy1phei'iO~

12..Nitrcphenol

i2.4--Dimethylphenol

Ibis(2"Ch!oroethoxy)mel~i!ne

12.4--DiCnIQrohenol P

1'.2.4--Trichlorobenzene

iNaphtha!ene

!4--Chloroaniline

!Hex<!chlorobutadiene

!~Chloro-3-melhylphenol

:2·Methylnaphthalene

~Hexachlorocyclopent8dlene

2.4.6- Trichlorophenol

,2,4,5- Trichlorophenol

12-Chloronaphthalene

12-Nltroaniiine

i Dlmelhytphlhalale

IAcenaphthyiene

i2.6-Dimlrotoluene

I3-Nltroaniline

IAcenaphthenl!

12,4--Dlnitrophenol

r~Nilrophenoi

i Dibenzoluran

:2.4--Dinitrotoluene

JletnYlpnmalale

:4- Chlorophenyl-phenylether

• _ values transferred from the dilution analysis

U - non-detected compound

B • detected in the corresponding method blank

J • estimated value

IN - presumptIVe evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R • rejected compound

u J U J '

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

u

u

U

U

U

u

U

U

u

u

u

u

u

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

U J ! u J U

u J

U J U

J

u J

u J U

46 J

u J U

u J 1

U J U

u J

U J U

u J

U J U

u J

u J U

u .1

u J U

U J

u J U

u J U

J

J

U

u

J

J

u J

U

J U .

u J I

u J U

U J U

U

U

U

·U J I U

U J I U

54 J I 50

u J U

u J U

U J U

U J U

U J U

U J U

U

j U

j U

J U

j U

j U

,

.- U

J U

J U

j U

J U

U

~60

U

u

240

u

u

U

e·22.

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

,

., 1

J ;

J I

J

J

, ,

" 1

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J i

U

U

U

u

U

54

U

u

U

u

u

u

u

U

u

u

u

U

u

u

J

J

J

j

J

J

J

J

J i

J i

J i

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

u

u

u

J i

J i

J I

u J

u J

42 J

J i

U J '

u J

u

u J

120 J

u J

u J

91 j

u J

u J

52 J

u J

J

L:

TIERRA-A-017848
Project: Keegan Landfill Site START PM: Gerry Gilliland

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (I-lQ/Kg) ....... -- ---- - ~........

[Scrni-Volatiles

!Method I

Soil i Soil Soil Soil Soil

BSE36

!

BSE37 BSE38 BSE44 Detection i BSE43

iLow ConcentratlOn 1Limit I

30~1207 30388.07 3038&-.08 -- 30388.11 30412.09

I Percent Moisture 60 i 40 53 21 21

IDilution Factor 10.0 i 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

I ~":I"~

I

,

I

IFluorene u J I J !

u J u J

I4-Nitroaniiine 830, U J U

830~ U J U

3301 u J U

3301 U J U

330] U J U

8301 U J

I U

330: 4200 J 3400

330' 1000 J 870

330: U J i 420

330 U J

I U

330 5400 J "2900

330 5400 J 4100

330 2800 J 190

330 u J U

330 2800 J 2300

330 3100 J 2200

330 "230000 J 1600

330' 1/00 J I U

330, 2200 J I 1800

330· 21500 J

, 1600

330: 3000 J 2000

330 1800 J 1200

330 u J 520

330 2C'JO ~ 1300

J I

J

14.ti- Dinitrcr2·metnylphenoi

N·Nrtrosodipileny1amrile

4- Bromophenyl-phenylether

HexachlorObenzene

j Pentachlorophenol

I Phenanthrene

Anthracene

,CartlazQle

!D~n-butvlchthalate

!Fluor~~t~~ne

J I

u

u

J

J i

J I

J I

J I

J I

39 J u J J '

u J u u J

u J !

J

J

J

u

u

J

J

J

J

1200

U

u u J u J J

u u J u J J

380 J 260 J 1200

120 J j

87 J

u J 110 j i u J

200 J 70 J

J i600 J

J 2200 J

J U J

J U J

, ... nr. J

'" 1..,""'\,/

J i400 J

J

.. ~/"'\'"' I (lJIJ '" I

.,'" I

J U j I,

J 1100 J

J 1100 J

J 1300 J

J 850 J !

J 350 J i

J 980 J

u J

410

620

!pyrene

IB~'lylbenzylphtt1alate

13.J.DlcnJorobenziome

!Benzo(a)anthrac:ene

Icnrysene

;bls(2-Ethylhexyl)phtnalate

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J I

J i

580 J

630 J

u J '~300

u J U

J 350

J 440

j 2000

, ..on

'" ........

J

,,'Tn .......

J

"An ~

J

A'>n ~...'"

J 360

J i

...n ,.......

J

"'An ...~

260

300

480

u

IBenzo(K}f1uoranthene . 200

IDI-n-octylphthalate

IBenzo(b)fluor,imthene

r Benzo(a)pyrene

IlndenO(1,2.3-cd)pyrene

:Dlcenz(a,h ,antnracene

J I

J

J i

J

J i

260

240

150

u

200 Be!'\Zo(g.h,i)perylene

•• values transferred from the dilution analySIS

U - non-detected compound

6 • detected in the corresponding methOd blan~

J • estimated value

IN . presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R • rejected compound

J

TIERRA-A-017849
OTHER.AllA1.YTES V10ro: TABLE

Project: Keegan Landfill Site

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31,1997

I:'::." -OXYC'l>\ '· ... 111\>'\> ... ' "' ..... ' ''''I u

0.5

U

J

J

J

l,J

0.8

U

J

J

J

START PM: Gf:rry Gilliland

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (ua!L..\

u

u

u

J

J

J I!

u

u

u

u J

N-Nitroso-<ii-n-propyiamine

u

u

~ J

1Semi-Volatiles

Method Water Water Water Water Water i

Detection BSE22 BSE23 BSE26 BSE41 BSE42 i

I

!Low Concentration Limit 30388.01 30388.02 30388.03 30388.10 30412.08 i

I Percent Moisture - - - - -

I

IDilution Factor

• n 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

~

iol

......

i

[Phenol " J U J U J I u J U J

I

v

I

IbIS(Z-C;;hioroeihyi)eiiler I

.n U J U J U J I u J U J I

..... ,

IZ-Ci'liorophenoi

1

.n U J U J U J I U J U J I

11.~Dichlorobenzene ~~~ U J U J U J U J

f

u J I

I~.~~~:~~~~~~~~~ I

10 U J U J U J U J U J I

101 u J U J U J U J I u J i

i

Il.~-UI~.rIlUiULol"'i::=I.I4""I'lI:i I 10,1 r2·Methy1pnenO~ u J U J U J U J I u J I

j~- l-: i. _"'I~ I

-_. J

------_\

,

I Ht:MCh~o.joethaite J u J

J

u

u

J

J

u

u J I

u

u

J

J

u J

!lsophcrone

u

u J

12,4-Dimethylphenol I 1(11 U J I u J U J I u J U J I i

!o,s(2-ChloroetholCY}methane I 1CII U J I u J U J I u J U j

i i

!2.~DichloroPhenOI

~

1C~ U J I u J U J I U J U J I

,

I

U J 1 u J U J I u J U J I

I

11.2,4- Trichlorobenzene 1() i

.. ., I i

u

u

INaohthalene !~Chloroaniline

u

u

I Hexachlorobutadiene u

I4-Chloro-3-methYJphenoi u

i2-Methytnaphthaiene u

u

u

• I Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

.4,6- Trichlorophenol

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

J

J

J

J

j

j

j

J

J

u J I u j

u J I

u

'"

I

J

i

J

I

oJ

I

oJ

I

oJ

J

I

oJ

I

oJ

j

J

J

J

J

J i

I

J !

J

J ~

J "l

J

~

J I

u J I

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

':.4,5- Tnchlorophenol

:2·Chloronaphthalene u

12-NrtroaniHne u

iD,methylphthalate u

iAcenaphthytene u

12,6-Dinitrotoluene u

I~Nrtroanjline u

IAcenaphthene u

12,~OlnitrophenOl u

J

J

J

J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U J

U

I

'" U J

U J

J

J

J

J

j

u

J

I4-Nitrophenol

IDlbenzofuran u

u

u

:2.4-0initrotoluene

.D,etnylphthalate

J

J

J I

u J

u

u

u

u

J

J

J

j

u

u

u

u j

U

I

oJ

II I

... oJ

U

I

oJ

"

I

V

'" II ,

...

'"

U J

II I

V

'"

"

J

'"U J

U J

j

J

J

u Ji

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

;~Chlorophenyt-phenyletl'\er

DL- Dilution Analyses

U • non-detected compound

B • detected in the corresponding method blank

J . estimated value

IN - presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R - rejected compound

u J I

u J !

u J i

u

u

J i

J i

u J i

J

J

J I

J

I

J

I

J

I,

J

I

J

I

J j

J

i

J I

I

J

l

J !

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

TIERRA-A-017850
Project: Keegan Landfill Site

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997

START PM: Gerry Gilliland

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (ua/_:

I Semi- Volatiles

[Low Concentration

I

Percent Moisture

Dilution Factor

Water

BSE22

30388.01

I

Water

BSE23

: 30388.02

I

1.0 1 1.0

Water

BSE26

30388.03

1.0 1.0

Water Water

BSE4l BSE42

30388.10 30412.08

u J

1.0

Fluorene J I

u J 1 U J u J u J 1

101

u J I U J u J u J u

N-N itrosodiphenytamine J I

4-Nitroanilme _. I 251

u J! U J U J u J u J !

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol

u J II U J u J u J u

101

U J t U J U J u J u J ! 1 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 101

U J I U J U J u J u J I

Phenanthrene U J I

Hexachlorooenzene 10!

u J I U J I U J u J I u J !

Pentachlorophenol 251

2 J! 1 J U J u J

10.

u J' U J U J U J U J 1

An:nracene

ICaroazole

10

u

- J I U J I u J U J u

J I

! 10,

u J I U J U J u J u J I

J ,

IDI-n-butylphthalate I 101

3 J I 2 J I 0.9 J u J U fFluoranthene I 10:

3 J I 3 J I 0.8 J

U J i

u J u l

!Pyrene i 10

I 10,

I 10

u

u

J: 1

J I U

J

J I

u

u

J u J u J

IBenzo(a)anthracene I 101

2 J u J u J u J I

Ibls(2-E lhylhexyl}phthalate

U

U

J I

J I

jChrysene

I 10:

I 101

I 101

I 10\

: 10,

10

10

10

DL- Dilution Analyses

U • non-detected compound

B - detected in the corresponding method blank

J - estimated value

IN - presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R - rejected compound

10,

3 J

U

2

1

1

0.6

U

U

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

U

U

J

J

0.5 J

u

u

J

J

12 BJI

u

U

U

U

J

J I

J

J

J I

J I

J

J

u

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

J

J

J

J

J u J u J u

TIERRA-A-017851
Project: Keegan Landfill START PM: Gerry Gilliland

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (lJo/Kg)

-

IPesticides

Method Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil I

Soil

Detection BSE31 BSE32 BSE33 BSE34 BSE35 BSE36 IBSE37DL

,

ILow Concentration Limit 30388.06 30412.03 30412.04 30412.05 30412.06 30412.07 G0388.07DL

Percent Moisture 59 24 77 90 88 60

I

40

Dilution Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.0

alpha-SHC 1.7 U J 1 U J I u J U J U J U J I u J

beta-SHC 1.71 U J U J I u J U J U J U J I U J

,

delta-SHC 1.71 U J U J I 78 J U J U J U J I U J I

gamma-SHC (Lindane) 1.7 U J U J I 58 J U J U J U J I u J 1

Heptachlor 1.7 U J U J I "140 IN U J U J U J I u J !

Aldrin 1.71 U J I u J I u J U J U J U J I U J l

,Heptachlor Epoxide 1.71 U J U J I "210 IN U J U J U J I u J 1

Endosulfan I 171 U J I 22 J I

"900 J U J U J 28 J I u J i

Dieldrin 3.31 U J I U J ·"330 EJ U J U J 21 IN I R I

14,4'-00E 3.3, U J U J I "730 IN U J U J I 23 J i 56 OJI

,Endrin 3.31 U J ! U J I R U J U J U J I 120 DJl

I Endosulfan II I 3.3! U J I u J I u J U J U J U J I R i

14,4'-ODO I 3.3; ""130 EJI U J 1 "1300 J I u J 81 J I 39 J I 42 DJ:

!Endosulfan Sulfate I

3.3i U J I U J I 16 J U J U J U J I u J

14,4'-00T 3.31 R I 9.5 J I

"780 IN U J U J 78 J I U J

I

I

IMethoxychlor I 17.0: R U J U J U J U J U J i u J

IEndnn Ketone I

3.3, U J : U J 47 J U J U J U J I U J ,

EndTin Aldehyde 3.3: U J ~ U J "810 IN U J U J R I u J !

[alpha-Chlordane 1.71 U J I 22 J "900 J U J U J 25 J I 83 OJ,

Igamma-Chlordane 1.71 U J I 20 IN "870 J U J U J I 26 J I 63 JNI

!Toxaphene 170.01 U J 1 U J U J U J U J U J I U J l

IAroclor-l016 3301 U J : U J U J U J U J U J I U J I

IArocJor-1221 ! 67.0' U J U J I U J I U J U J U J I U J I

IAroclor-1232 I 33.0, U J : U J I U J U J U J I U J I U J I

Aroclor-1242 I 33.0 U J • U J I U J I u J U J I u J I U J l

iAroclor-1248 I 33.0 U J U J I U J U J U J U J I U J I

iA:oclor-1254 ! 33.0 u J I U J I U J U J U J U J I U J I

IAroclor-1260 1 33.0: U J 110 J I

"8100 J U J U J I 350 J I 650 OJI

I

• - Value transferred from dilution analysis.

"" _Analyie not detected in dilution analysis. therefore value not transferred.

U - non-detected compound

B - detected in the corresponding method blank

J - estimated value

IN - presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R - rejected compound

TIERRA-A-017852
OTllliR tu~AL YTE~ 't,'ORK TABLE

Project Keegan Landfill START PM: Gerry Gilliland

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997 SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (j.Ig/Kg)

--

lPeStiCideS

Method Soil Soil Soil Soil I Soil I

Soil I

Soil

Detection BSE46 BSE47 BSE48 BSE27 BSE28DL BSE29 BSE30

ILow Concentration Limit 130412.10 30412.11 30412.12 3038804 0388.05DL 30412.01 130412.02

Ip~rcent ~oisture I 66 64

i

76 52 48 32 : 60

• n • n 10 1.o 10_°

1.0 1.0

J U

U J

I.U

u J II u J U

laIPna.cn ...

beta-BHe J! U J Ii U

J I U J i u

U J t 16 IN I U

U J I u J u J

U J I u J u J

U J I u J

u 12 J

J I u J I

R

J I u

J I U

U

U

J i

IN i

u

J I U J 1 u

~Heptachlor

u

U

U

J I u

J I U

23

"180

u J , u J I

u 31 JNj J I 4.9 J I

U

17

Dleidrin u

u

J I R

IN I 16

50

'140

J I U

J I 26

J I U

u

u

u

J 1 48

JNIU

J1 73

R

69 l

~~~~~ulfan II

,4,4'-DOD '1900

J I U

J r-R

J L U

U

48

U

II Endo5ulfan Sulfate

4,4'-00T

Ii~~~~~~~~O~e

100

U

3.5

26

J I

J I

U

U

240

J I

J I

DJI

J i

14 JNi 25

29 IN, 54

U j

I U

U j

: u

26 J I 78

U j U

73 ..JNf .I '"'" \.IU

U J I R

U J i iO

31 ".II

"'1'41 "

n

"'0 I

i 29 ." ..

24 J t 16

U

I I II ~ I

'"

U J I u

U J I U

II J U

U J U

U J lJ

U J U

520 J 600

U

130

U

J I

DJi

J I

u u J I U

IEndrin Aldehyde '260 72 J I U

i

u

J

I

u

J I u

J i u

J I u

, , .,

J

!

'" J i u

J U

J U

J

",'>n

........u J

J I

J

"v

J I R

J I U

U

U

J I U !Toxaphene I U U

u u J i u IAroclor·1 016

J I 67.C1 u J u J I U !Aroclor.1221 I ,

.. ,

33.CII J

u j u

u IAroclor·1232 u

J

:Aroclor·1242 u

u u J u

IAroclor ·1248 J u u J u IAroclor-1254

320 J

!Aroclor.1260 33.CI 690 j

• _ Value transferred from dilution analysis .

•• _ Analyte not detected in dilution analysis, therefore value not transferred.

U • non·detected compound

B • detected in the corresponding method blank

J • estimated value

IN • presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R • rejected compound

u j i

u

i3

72

u

u

U

II

u

u

u

450

J j

J I

II

Y I

J I

oJ i

J

DJ,

J

J ,

J

J

J

J

J

..! ~

J I

J i

J !

J I

J !

J

J

J !

TIERRA-A-017853
OTHER ANAL YTES "NORK TAE~:=

-

l:eSti~des. __.,_

Method Soil Soil f 50;\ I

,

Detection BSE38 BSE43DL SE44DL I

Limit 30388.08 30388.1lDL 0412.09DL

i

iLOW l"..onCemnmofi -- -- j

I~~r~ent ~oi~ture 53 21 21 I

1~1I';'lIO~,~~Ctlll' I

1.0 10.0 I 1~O J

I

• 7 U J U J I I I I

lalPna-onw j

..-

107 U J U J I u J

I

Ii

I I

beta-SHe

Idetta-BHC 1.7 U .,I u J I u J I

,

I

I

I

lQamma-BHC (L~ndane) 1.7 u J U J U J I

]

,

i

I

,

Heptachlor 1.7 U J U J U J

I iFud I I

jAldrin l

10~ U J U J I u J I

!

u...... t~ ......,.,I.....r CnI'\YI"'. L U J U J I u J I I 'l"'t"'~ ........... - ....-,..,.--

I~~~~E-u :1 3:31

I

u J I R I u J

I

I I I

IE'ndrln--

3.3 U J lBO OJI U J II I I

I 3.31 u J 300 0 .,IN I U J

I

I I i

IEndosulfan II I 3.31 u J R I u J I I

I !

i

-

iE'nd~s~lfan Sulfate I 3:31

,

U J I u .,I I u .,I I

I

I !

14,4'-00T

1

303~

R 600 0 JNI 61 0 .,IN I

I

i

I

IMethoxychlor R U .,I I U J i

I

17.01 I

Endrin Ketone 3.3, U .,I U .,I I u .,I I

I I

I

Project: Keegan Landfill

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997

I F rldosulfan I 171

144 ODD 331

IEndnn Aldehvde

u

u

u

START PM: Gerry Gilliland

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (IJO/Kg)

.,I I u J I u

J I R u .,I I

J I 93 0.,11 u J

1.7' I

u J i

U J

U J

U J

U J

U j

U J

II

... J

U .,I I

SiD OJ!

ialpha-Chlordane

Igamma-Chlordane

u u j 190 DJ!

1 I

u to(

IToxaphene

u

u

j I 1800 DJj

u

iJ j I

J I

u J I

I Aroctor-1 016

IAroclor-1221

u

u J I

!Aroclor.1232

Aroclor ·1242

'IAroclor-1248

IAroclor-1254

IAroclor.1260

u

u

u

u

J 1

u J I

J i

J j

J I

u J

u .,I I

• - Value transferred from dilution analysis .

•• _Analyte not detected in dilution analysis, therefore value not transferred,

U - non-detected compound

B - detected in the corresponding method blank

J - estimated value

IN - presumptive evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R • rejected compound

TIERRA-A-017854
O'1"1ILr~AJ:-'\1.YfE~ WORK T o\31.E

Project: Keegan Landfill Site START PM: Gerry Gilliland

Sampling Date: July 30 & 31, 1997

SAMPLE #/CONCENTRATION (lJg/L)

!

IPesti~des .

Low concentrahon

Percent Moisture

1 Dilution Factor

Water

BSE22

30388.01

1.0

J

I Water

. BSE23

1

303~8.02

! 1.0

Water Water Water

BSE26 BSE41 BSE42

30388.03 30388.10 30388.08

1.0 1.0 1.0

u

u

..

¥

!

- -

I

loelUt-BHC I

0.0501 U J U J ! u J I U J U J I ]

I r. . ~gamm3=BHWi (Undane) 0.0501 U J I U J I U J I U J U J i I

IHeptachlOi I 0.0501 U J I U J I U J i U J U J I I

t

ldiin I ~::t u J I u J U J I u J U J

I

I

.Heptachlor Epoxide 1

U J I u J U J U J U J I

IEndCisulfan I

00501 U J ! u J U J U J U J I I

fr"\._II'4 .....

lalpha-SHe

(beta-SHe

• ,,-,1Il;iIWIIII

I. ~'_nnl=

0.101

u

u

u

I U J

II J

J

u

u

J

J

u J U J U J U J

U J U J U J U J

0.10!

U

U

J U J

J U J

U J U

U J U

J

J

0.10 1

0.101

0101

IE.ndcsu!fan II

U

U

u

u

J

J

J

J

u J U J U J U J

14 A'-ODD

i E'nd~s~l!an Sulfate 0.10: U J U J I U J U J U J

U J

U j

U J

II 1

V oJ

U J

U J

U

I

oJ

U J

"

J

""

U J

U J

U J

U J

u J

f4,4'-DOT

! Methoxychlor

0.10!

0.501

U

U

J

J

U

U

U J

U J

IEndrin Aldehyde 0.101

U J I U J U J

IEndrin Ketone 0.101 u

u

J

J U J I U j U J

U J

U J

U J

II I

V oJ

U

,

oJ

U

I

oJ

U J

U J

U J

U J

!alpha-Chlordane 0.0501 U J u

0.0501 u J u J I U J

u J i U J

Igamma-Chlordane

iToxaphene 5.01 U J U J I U J

u J I U J

,., ...... IAroclor-l016 1.0i U j

u J I U J

1.0

1.0

u

U

J I U J

J I U J

:Aroc!or·1232

2.0 U J

J

j

J

,ArocIOr.1254

1.0 u

J u J I U J

u

u

, .0 u

II

"" J U J

,Aroclor-1250

U • non-detected compound

B • detected in the corresponding method blank

J - estimated value

IN . presumptIVe evidence of a compound

at an estimated value

R • rejected compound

1.0 u J

TIERRA-A-017855
RECORD OF COMMUNICATION

REGIONAL SAlvIPLE CONTROL CENTER C-'r':-;\'-

",CI..,,1:i ':.J

DCT 0 9 i997 DATE:

SUBJECT:

FROM:

TO:

!JV{;,;"'I, /CftJ7

CLP Data Package for Qualiry Assurance Review

RSCC I ESAT

~or8e Karras. Hazardous Waste Suppon Section

Attached is the following ORGANIC Data Package to be rel:iewedfor Quality A.ssural1ce

SITE ;Ye-e6',fN Lr CASE# ;!S6tJ!

CONTRACTOR ~':"---1t?.TtJ #SAMPLES MATRIX

/7 S~/L

PHASE ,(lfJ fc L.t0-/i"i(

LAB SIVO/( FRACTION FUll... 7CL

'..

REGION IT RSCC DATA 1R~'lSFER LOG

.. -.. ....". Relinquished By

Signature Daterrime

Received Bv

Signature Date/Time

,r).I/;1

I / I

(over for instructions) revised 7/Cf)

TIERRA-A-017856
SOP NO. HW-6

Revision #11

l-fay 1996

CLP ORGANICS DATA REVIEW

AND PRELIMINARY REVIEW

(CLF/SOW OL~O 3.2)

By:

George K _ras~ Work Assignwen~ Manager/Chemist

Toxic and Hazardous Was~e Sec~ion •

... -~-_..

By:

Karen Taylor, ChemFst

Toxic and Hazardous Waste Section

CONCUR.'ll:D BY: ~~ ,,0. ~

~evin Kubik, hie:

TO~ and .'H2.ZaraC s Haste Section

APPROVl::J BY: ~&/~A"'7:'ft~

Robet~ Runvon, Chieff

~.onlorlng anagenen't.ranc M 't . -M I. B h

,. '31

Date:

Date:

Date: ~t'it

TIERRA-A-017857
TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION:

Scope and Applicability .

Summary of Method . . .

Reviewer Qualifications

· . .. .

1

1

1

DEFINITIONS:

Ac:=onyms •.

Data Qualifiers

· . . . 2

· . . 3

PACKAGE COMPLETENESS AND DELlVERABLES:

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

Chain of CustodY and Sa~oling Trip Report

Data completene~s and Deiiverables·

Cover Letter SDG Narra~ive . . . .

Data Validation Checklist . . . . . . . .

4

4

5

6

PART A: VOA ANALYSES

1.0 Sample Conditions/problems · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 7

2.0 Holding Times · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

7

/''\ 3.0 System Monitoring ComE=0und (SMC) Recovery (Fo~ II VOA) 9

......J 4.0 Matrix Spikes (Form II! VOA)

· · · · · · · · · ·

11

5.0 Blanks (Form IV VOA) · · · · · · · · · • · · · · · · · ·

11

6.0 Contamination · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

13

7.0 GC/MS Instrument Perfor:nance Check (Form V VOA) · · ·

15

8.0 Target Compound List (TCL) Analytes (FOR..?1I VOA) · · ·

16

9.0 Tentatively Identified Compounds (TIC) · · ·

IS

10.0 Compound Quantitation and Reported Detection Limits 19

11. 0 Standards Data (GC/MS) · · · · · · · · · · · · · 20

12.0 GC/MS Initial Calibration (Fonn VI VaAl · · ·

20

13.0 GCjMS Continuing Calibration (Form VII VaAl

· · ·

21

14.0 Internal Standard (For:nVIII VaAl 23

15.0 Field Duplicates

· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

24

PART B: BNA ANALYSES

1.0 Sample Conditions/Problems · · · · · · · 25

2.0 Holding Times

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

25

3.0 Surrogate Recovery (For:n II SV) · · · · · 26

4.0 Matrix spikes (Form II SV)

· · · · · · · · ·

28

5.0 Blanks {Form IV SV}

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

29

6.0 Contamination · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

30

7.0 GC/MS Instrument: Perior::lanceCheck (For:n V SV) · · · ·

32

8.0 Target Comoound List (TCL) Analytes (FOP.!'!I SV) · · ·

33

9.0 Tentatively Identified Compounds (TIC) · · ·

35

, 10.0 Compound Quantitation and Reported Detection Limits 36

,J 11.0 Standards Data (GCjMS)

· · · · · · · · · · ·

36

12.0 GCjMS Initial calibration (For:n VI SV)

· · · · · · 37

TIERRA-A-017858
13.0 GC/MS Con~inuins c21i==a~ion (?orm V,T SV)

14.0 In~ernal S~2n=a=d (?o~ VIII 5V)

15.0 Field Duplica~es

PART c: PESTICIDE/PCB ANALYSIS

3E

'l,..",

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11. 0

12.0

13.0

Sample Conditions/P=oblems .

Holding Times

Surrogate Recovery (Form II PEST)

Matrix Spikes (Form III PEST)

Blanks (Form IV PEST)

.Contamination

Calibration and GC performance

Analytical Sequence C~eck (Form VIII PEST)

CleanuD Efficiencv Verification (Fo~ IX PEST)

Pesticide/PCB Identifica~ion (Form X PEST)

Target Compound Lis~ (TCL) Analytes

COwpound Quan~i~a~icn and Repor~ed De~ection Limits

Field Duplicates

eLP Da~a Assesswen~ .

Organic Regional Data Assess~ent Su~~ary Form .

-~ - r. '3-:1

42

42

43

.-.. ~

55

56

57

59

60

62

. Attac~:::lent1

. Att.ac:::ment2

Attac::':::ent 3

TIERRA-A-017859
IN'I'RODOCTION

Scope and App1i"ca:bi1ity

This SOP offers detailed cuidance in evaluatinc labora~~~J

data generated according to th~ methods in the "USEPA Cont::-ac-:-

Laboratory Program statement of Work for Organics Analysis

OLM03.2," August 1994. The validation methods and act.ions

discussed in this document are based on the requirements se~

forth in the "USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National

Functional Guidelines for organic Data Revie',.;,"February 1994.

This document attempts to cover technical as well as cont::-ac-:ual

problems specific to each frac~ion and sample mat::-ix;however,

situations may arise where data limitations must be assessed

based on the reviewer's professional judgement.

,-,."

In addition to technical requirements, cont::-act.ual

requirements are also covered in this document. While it is

important that instances of contract non-compliance be addressed

in the Data Assessment, the tec~nical criteria are always used to

qualify the analytical data.

Summary of Method

To ensure a thorouah evaluation of each result in a da~a

case, the reviewer mustJcowple~e the checklist within this SO?,

answering specific questions while performing the prescribed

IIACTIONSIIin each section. Qualifiers (or flags) are a==plied to

questionable or unusable resul~s as instructed. The data

qualifiers discussed in this document are defined on page 4 of

the National Functional Guidelines mentioned above.

The reviewer must pre==are a detailed data assess~e~t to be

submitted along with the completed SOP checklist. The Da~a

Assessment must list all data qualifications, reasons for

qualifications, instances ef missing data and cont=act noncompliance. This information is further sua~arized on t~e

organic Regional Data Assess~ent Summary and Data Rejection

Summary forms (see attached).

CADRE reports, when available, are to be incorporated into

the Data Assessment. To generate CADRE reports for a particular

SDG, follow the SOP for Validating ~~S/CL? Data Cases wi~~ ~;GIC,

CARD and CADRE (see attached).

Reviewer Qualifications

This sOP is intended for use by organic data validators who

have successfully completed the USEPA Region II da~a validation

training program. Data reviewers must possess a werking

knOWledge of the USEPA Sta~emen~ of Work and Natienal Func~ional

Guidelines mentioned above.

TIERRA-A-017860
DEFINITIONS

Acronyms

BFB b~ornofluorobenzene

BHC benzene hexachlo~i~e

BNA - Ease neu~ral acic

CADRE - Computer Aided Data Review and Evaluation

CARD - CLP Analy~ical Resul~s Database

CCS - contract compliance screening

CLASS - Contract Labo~a~ory Analytical Se~Jices Support

CLP - Contract Laborato~v Prccram

CRQL - Contract Requirec·Quan~itation Limit

%D - percent difference

DCS -decachlo~obiohenv~

DDD - a"c"lorod'o-honvla'i~~i~rccT"~ne ••• _ ._ .. _~~ \..0 •• _ .... _ -_ •• _.

DDE - dichlorodipheny~et~ane

DDT - dichlorodipheny~~richloroethane

GC - gas chrorna~cg=aphy

GC/EC - gas chrc~atograFh/elec~rcn capture detector

GC/MS - gas chroma~os~aph/~ass spectrometer

GPC - gel permeation chrc~atcgraphy

IS - internal stan=ard

kg - kilogram

tJ,g - :microgram

~~;GIC - Mainfra~e ~ccess Graphical Interface with C~~D

~S - matrix soike

~~SD - ma-:.-__ix -5 .... _; ~ k-_- ,.:;"....i ~,..~-o \",..\-:;----_...-'--

e - liter -

we - mililiter

?CS - polychlorinated biphenyl

?E - performance evalua~ion

PEM - Performance Evaluation ~ix~ure

QC - quality con~rol

RAS Routine Analytical Services

RIC reconstructed ion chronatog=a~

RPD relative pe~~e~~ di::e~e~ce

?~F relative response fact~=

?RF average relative response factor (froT. initial calibra~ion)

?~T relative retention ~~~e

RS~ - rela~ive standar= devia~:on

RT - retention ti~e

RSCC - Regional Sa~ple Co~trDl Ce~ter

SDG - sa~ple delivery group

SMC system monitoring c~~po~nd

SOP - s~andard o?era~ing pr~=e=ure

SOW - Statenent of Work

SVOA - se~ivolatile organic ?c~d

TeL - Target compound ~is~

TCLP - ToXicity C~aracteristics Leachate Procedure

TCX -tetrachloro-m-xylene

T!C - tentatively iden~i:ied conpcund

TIERRA-A-017861
Acronyms (cont/d.)

TPO - technical project officer

VOA - volatile organic acid ---

VTSR - validated time of sample receipt

WAM - EPA Work Assignment Manager

Data Qualifiers

u The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected

above the repor~ed sample quantitation linit.

J The analyte was positively dienrified; the associated

numerical value is the approximate concentra~ion of the

analyte in the sample.

N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte :or

which there is presumptive evidence to make a

"tentative iden~ification."

NJ The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte that

has been "tentatively identifiedll and the associated

numerical value represents its approximate

concentration.

UJ The analyte was no~ detected above the reported sample

auantitation limit. However, the renorted cuanti~a~ion

iimit is approxima~e and mayor may not represent the

actual limit of cuantitation necessarY to accura~elv

and precisely measure the analyte in the sample. -

R The sample results are rejected due to serious

deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and

meet quality contrrol criteria. The presence or

absence of the analyte cannot be verified.

TIERRA-A-017862
STAlm;;:RD OPERAT!NG PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLF/SOW O~~03.2

Date: J1.:.:lelS96

SOP :.-w-6, Rev. :~

PACKAGE C~!?LETENESS AND DELIVERABLES

CASE NUMBER:

SDG Number(s):

/

L..~30RATORY:

S!TE NAHE:

1.0 Chain of custodv and Sa~ol!na Trio Reoorts

1.1 ?ec~~~s/Chai~-of-C~s~ody Recor~s

S

",,:"""lcS? (;,.;,"".,;:--- ..

Are 'the ':'::-=.ffic

p::-esen~ fer all

ACTION: If no, CCj;~='C~ RS~C, C~ ccn~2C~ the W~~ to

obtain reolacemen~ of nissing or illegible

cop_io_ s:--0- ~~o lQh -- ... ~."- .."~.

1.2 Is t~e Sa~pli~g T::-ip Report F~esent for all

sanples a~~ a1: f::-a~~iOj;s?

ACTION: ::f no, .ce~-:=.c~ei-:.he:rRSCC o:r ask t~e WA..11to

cbtain ~~is :~fc=~a~ion =~=n ~he prime

c::mt::-ac-:::,~.

2.0 Data Conpleteness and Deliverables

2.1 Have any r.issing del~ve=ables been received and

added to the data pa~kage?

NOTE: The lab is ::-e~uired~o s~=rni~ data for only tHO

analyses, fcr-e2ch f:ac"::'cn. (i.e., the original

sanple an~ one Gi:u~~on, or ~~e ~os~ concentra~ed

dilu-:ion analy:ed an~ one f~::-~herdilution.)

AC':'ION:Con-:ac~ ~he i';;'~"! -:'0 obt=.in a:1 ex?lanat.ion or

res~bmi~"":al of anV ~iss:ng delive::-ables iron

-:he lab. If lab cannot provide them, note the

effec~ on the reV~e~ of ~he oackaae in the

Contract ?ro=lems/Ncn-ccmpli~nce sec-:ion of the

Data Assessmen~ ai.~ the Or;anic Regional Data

Assessment Sun~a:y fo:r~.

:2 .2 Was Cu..SS C::S chec}:l is~ i:-:clt.:::'e·::!with package"'"

2.3 Are there any ciscrspancies between the Traffic

Repor~s/Chai~-of-cus~~dy Records, Sampling Report

and Sample Tags?

TIERRA-A-017863
S~ANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: eLP/SOW oLM03.2

Date: J~ne :996

SOP EW-6, Rev. ::

YES NO N/A

ACTION: If yes, contact the W~~ to obtain an explanation

or resubmittal of any missing deliverables f=on

the laboratory.

3.0 Cover Letter SOG Narrative

3.1 Is the Narrative or Cove~ Letter P~esent?

3.2 Are case number, SDG nu~=er and con~ract nur.~er

contained in the SDG Nar~ative or cover le~ter

(see SOW, Exhibit B, sec~ion 2.6.1)?

3.3 Does the narrative con~a:n the following

information:

VOA: descriotion of trap and columns used

during· sample analyses?

BNA: description of columns used curing sample

analyses?

Pest: description of cclunns used curing sanple

analyses?

NOTE: As per section 6.23.3.l sow/po D-ll/Pest,

Packed columns are not permitted.

3.4 Does the narrative, VOA and BNA sections,

contain a' list of all TICs identified as alkanes

and their estimated concentrations?

3.5 Does the narrative cont=in a record of all cooler

temperatures? If the te~perature of a cooler was

exceeded, > 10° C, the lab mus~ list by fraction

and sample number, all a::ected samples.

/

/~

)

r I

/

!

,'I,

_r_l

/

i 1

I

I

r' 1

J

r 1

3.6 Does the narrative contain a list of the pH

values determined for eac~ water sample submitted

for volatile analysis (SOW Exhibit S, section

2.6.1.2)? l-l

3.7 Does the Case Narrative contain the statement,

"verbatim", as required in Section B of the SO~·;:

ACTION: If "No", to any ques~icn in this sectior.,

contact the W~~ to ob~=in all necessary

resubmittals. If infor~ation is not available,

document in the Data Assessment under Ccntract

Problems/Non-Compliance section.

TIERRA-A-017864
STA~DARD OPERrlTING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: eLF/SOW OLMG3.2

Date: J"t::::le1996

SOP h~~-6,Rev. ~:

4.0 Data Validation Che=kli~t

4.1 Check the nackace fo~ t~e follo~i~g

disc:::epan::les:-

a. Is the package paginated in ascending order

s~a:::tingf:::ornthe SDG narrative?

b. Are all forms and copies legible?

c. Is e=::~ f~actio~ asse~bled in t~e orde:::set

fc~th in the SOW?

Data su~~ary Package

p~e~edi~g the Sample

submitted

Data Package?

The follc~ing checklist is divided into three

parts. Pa:::tA is fer any VOA analyses I Part B is

for ENAs and Pa:::tC is Pesticide/PCBs.

Does t~is ~ackage c=~~a:n:

VO.; Data?

BNA Data?

?es-=icide./:"':B c.'",-",?

............ - .

ACTION: Cccple~= corresponding pa:::tscf c~e~klist.

YES NO

r/

r 1 ./

TIERRA-A-017865
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: JU:le 1=96

SOP EW-6, Rev. ~1 US EPA Region II

MAthod: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

y::s NO

PART A: VOA ANALYSES

1.0 Samole Conditions/Problems

1.1 Do the Traffic Reports/Chain-of-Custody Rec=rds,

Sampling Report or Lab Narrative indicate any

problems with sample receipt, condition of

samples, analytical problems or special

circumstances affecting the quality of the data?

I

\/ r 1

~

Ar - (2..:;.:.; C(":-,;.,,<--"'~

ACTION: If any saople analyzed as a soil, other than

TCLP, contains 50% - 90% water, all dat~ should

be flagged as estima~ed (J). If a soil sample

other than TCLP con~ains mere than 90% water,

all data should be ~~alified as unusable (R).

ACTION: If samples were not iced or the ice was melted

upon arrival at the lacoratory and the c=oler

temperature was eleva~ed (> 10° C), then flag

all positive resul~s with a IIJII and all nondetects "UJ".

ACTION: If both VOA vials for a sa~ple have air bubbles

or the VOA vial analyzed had air bubbles, flacr

all positive results-II J"and all non-detects ~

"R".

ACTION: The smallest soil size permitted is 0.5g. If

any soil sample is swaller than 0.5g, document

in the Data Assessment under Contract

Problems/Non-Compliance.

2.0 Holding Times

2.1 Have any VOA technical helding times, dete~ined

from date of collection to date of analysis, ceen

exceeded?

Technical Holdina Times: If unprese~ved, aqueous

samples, maintained at 4- C for aromatic hydrocarbcns

analysis must be analyzed within 7 days of

collection .. If preserved with Hel (pH < 2) and

stored at 4- C, then aqueous samples must be ana~yzed

within 14 days of collec~ion. If uncertain about

preservation: contact saopler to determine whether cr

not samples were preserved. The holding ~i~e for

soils is 10 days from date of collec~icn.

TIERRA-A-017866
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: J"..::le:996

SOP ~-6, Rev. :: US EPA Region II

Method: eLP/SOW OLM03.2

Table of Holdina Time Violations

(See C~ain-of-Cus~ody Records)

...

/1./ CJ

Date

Sampled

7/;,~/tj7

J

Date Lab

Received

;-/J..Ie -;

Date

Analyzed Sanple

ID

Sample

Matrix

Was sar..ple

Preserved?

/

~/ /

~C:!ON:If techni=al hcld~ng ~imes are exceeded, flag all

pcsi "toiver=s·J.~ts as es::imated "J" and sample

q'..:.an-:.ita:::"c:1li:::it.sas estimated "UJ", and

documen~ in ::he Dat.a Assess~ent t.hat holding

ti~es were exceeded. If analyses were done mo~e

than 1~ days beyond holding time, either on the

:irst analysis or upon re-analysis, the reviewer

must use professional judge~ent to dete=mine the

reliability of the da~a and the effects of

additional s-:.oragecn the sample results. At a

ninimuIn, all results I:lustbe qualified "3", but

the reviewer may deter~ine that nor.-de~ect data

are unusal:le "?~I !f holding ti::lesa:!:"eexceeded

by mC~2 ~h2~ 28 cays, all non de~ec~ cata a~e

unusable ":R".

HO~~: Contrac::ual ~clci~c Ti~es: Analysis of water and

soil/sedi~ent. sa~ples Dust be completed within 10

days of Validated Ti~e of Sample Recei~t (VTSR)

This requirenen:: does net apply to PerfO~illance

Evaluation (PE) sa~ples.

AC~!ON: If cont.rac~ual holding ~imes are exceeded,

document. in the Da~c Assess~ent and on the

Organic Resicnal Da~a Assesswent Sun~a~y form.

~IOTE: The cat a reviewer ~us~ note in the Da~a Assessment

whethor or not technic~l and contractual holding

·times were rne~.

_ /' _ (',1..(1

TIERRA-A-017867
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: Jt:::le199E us EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW O~~03.2 SOP nw-6, Rev. ::

3.0 SYstem Monitoring Comoound (SMC) Recoverv (Fo~ II)

3.1 Are the VOA SMC Recove~y SUrn~aries (Fc~ II)

present for each of the following ma~rices:

a. Low Water?

b. Low Soil?

c. Med Soil?

3.2 Are all the VOA samFles ~:s~ed on the a~F~cp~~ate

System Monitoring CamFcu~c Recoveyy Su~~ary for

each of the following ~a~~ices:

a. Low Water?

b. Low Soil?

c. Med Soil?

ACTION: Contact the WAM to ob~ain an explanation or

resubmittal of anY missina delive~ables f~on

the laboratory. If missing deliverables are

unavailable, documen~ the effect in the Data

Assessment.

3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk?

ACTION: Circle all outliers with red oe~cil.

3.4 Was one or more VOA sys~=~ monitoring cC~Found

recovery outside of con~=act specifications for

any sample or method bla~k?

If yes, were samples re-a~alyzed?

Were method blanks re-analyze~?

ACTION: If recoveries are ~ 10%, but 1 or more

compounds fail to rneec so~ specifications:

1. All positive resul~s a~e qualified as

estimated IIJII.

2. Flag all non-detects as esti~a~ed Getection

limits "UJII where rec::lve::-yis less than t:J.e

lower acceptance limit.

_ tE" _ D. </2. /~ ,-

/

rv{

r ,

r 1

r - 1

TIERRA-A-017868
ST~~DAP.D OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: eLP/SOW OL~03.2

Datr: ,June 1996

SOP E""li'- 6I ?ev.

J. If SMC ~e=ove~ies are above allowable

levels, do no~ qualify nen-detects.

If any sys~em moni~o~ing c=~pound recovery is

< 10%:

1. Flag all posi~:'ve resul~s as estimated lIJlI.

2. Flag all non-cetects as unusa~le "iZ".

P~ofes5ional judge~ent should be used to

q'.lalifyca-:a tha~ only have methcd blank SMC

recove~ies out of s~ecifica-:ion in both

original and re-analyses. Check the internal

s":.anda~=areas.

NOTE: Contract~al requirements state that if any SMC

fails the ac=ep~ance criteria, the sample must be

re-analyzed. If the affected sample was not reanalyzed, coc~~en~ in the D2.-:2. Assessment under

Con~rac~ ?r=b~e~s/Non-Co~pliance and in the

Organic rte~icnal Da~a Assess~ent Summary.

NOTE: The labcra-:o~y must su=~it the following data:

1. If SMC recoveries and internal standard

responses neet the ac=eptance criteria in the reanalyzed sanple, then the laboratory must submit

O~'y .,- ·h~ "- - ---o_~~~'vs~~ _."-- ... -_.

... -f' ..:.• .L. an

response

S~C recovery and/or internal standard

fails to meet the asceptance criteria

~pon ~e-a~alys~51 t~e~ su~~i~ data f=o= beth

analyses.

(Re:e~ to secticn 11.4.3.2, ~age D-~6/VOA of t~e

SO~" ~ ...... l· ~o~ -~-o ;n:or-a-'~n ) •.1 l.",._ ...... I.

3.5 A~e there any ~ransc~ip~ion/calcula~ion e~~ors

betNeen ~aw data and FO~ill II?

ACTION: I= lar;e e~~ors exis~, contact the W~~ to

obtain an explanation or resubrnittal of

correc-:ed delive~ables f~orn the laboratorv.

Make any necessary correc~icns and no~e t~~

effec~ in ~he Da~a Assessnent.

- 10 - P ~J

TIERRA-A-017869
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region J:J:

Methoa: CLP/SOW O~~03.2

Da~e: J'~ne :'996

SOP liW-6, Rev. :.:.

4.0 Matrix Soikes (Form III)

4.1 Is the Matrix Spike/Matrix spike Duplica~e

Recovery Form (Form II!) present?

4.2 Were matrix snikes analyzec at the required

frequency for"each of t~e following rna~=ices:

a. Low Water?

b. Low Soil?

c. Med soil?

..~•.~.

ACTION: If any matrix spike ca~a are missing, take

action specified in sec~ion 3.2 above.

4.3 How many VOA spike recoveries are ou~side QC

limits?

Water Soils

Q;E22..· 6 out of 10 0 out of 10

e:; .J...~ B~c"'9C:: C ~.

4.4 How many RPDs for matrix spike and matrix spike

duplicate recoveries are outside QC li~its?

Water Soils

BSf22: 6 out of 5 0 out of 5

_ Q ~ G:;f;yt.' C ~/

ACTION: No action is taken based upon MS/MSD data

alone. However, using informed professional

jUdgement, the MS/MSD results may be used in

conjunction with other QC criteria to cete~ine

the need for qualification of the data.

ACTION: Circle all outliers wi~h red pencil.

s.o Elanks (Form IV)

5.1 Is the Method Blank su~~~ry (Form IV) present?

5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of VOA

TeL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been

analyzed for each SDG or every 20 sanplas of

similar matrix (low water, low soil or mediu~

soil), whichever is mere f=ecuent?

- /- f·WI

YES NO :S/A

r\{

r i ..J

i

rJ,

TIERRA-A-017870
S~ANO~ OPERATING PROCEDuRE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLF/SOW OLMC3.2

Da":e: June 1.996

SOP EW-6, Rev. ::

5.3 Has a VOA Qe~hod ~~ank been analyzed at least

once eve=y ~welve ~ou~s for each concentration

level anc. GC/~S sy~~e!:'.used?

,-\".

5.4 Was a VOA inst=u~s~t blank analyzed after eac~

sample/dilu~ion wh~ch contained a target compound

that exceeded the !nitial calibration range?

5.5 Was a VOA s~oraoe ~lank analyzed at the end of

all samples =or~e~eh SDG in a case?

ACTION: If any De~hod/in§~=u~ent blank data are

rnissi~~/ cor.~act the WAM to obtain any missing

delive=ables fro~ the laboratory. If method

blank data a=e not available, reject "R" all

associa~ed pcsi~{ve data. HOwever, using

professional jUd~~~en~, the data reviewer may

subs~i~u~e fieid plank or t=ip blank data for

missing me~hod bl~nk data.

If any ins~rumen~ plank analyzed after a sarnole

with tigh concer.~~~tion is missing, contact the

w;~~t8 c=tain any missing deliverables frop t~e

_ _ la;..,o"'-~.....·· T~~~;.,el.·ns........·'rne,..,t-blank '"'as v • _ _ b'/". '-- ""'" ~,I, _ _. w ....... ""0'"

analy:ed ;r not av~ilable, inspect the

chrorna~ccrarn of ttl§ sample analyzed immediatelv

after ~~Is analysi~ for possible carryover. -

Use p~=fessional J~dgement to dete=mine if any

conta~ination oc=u:red and qualify analyte(s)

accor::':'ngly.

If st=~age blank d~ta is missing, c~ntact t~e

~~~ t8 cb~a:'n anv ~issing deliverables from t~e

labora~orv. I: u~~vailable, note in the

Contrac~ P~cble~s/Ncn-compliance section of the

Da-=a ;_S3eSS~e:1"':.

5.6 The va~i=a~or sho~l~ ver~:y that the correct

iden~ifica~ior. s=heme for the E?A Blank samoles

were use~. See page 5-33/ sec~ion 3.3.7.3" 0:

the SOW :or fu=~he~ infor~aticn.

Was the correct idsntification scheme used for

.:=.:1 v0;'. ::2.an}:s?

ACTION: Contac~ the WAM :0 ob~ain missing deliverables

from tje lab, or wake the required corrections

on the forms. Document in the Data Assessment

under Contrac~ p~oble~s/Non-compliance if

correc~icns wers made by the validator.

YES NO l'/A

r/_

r/

rJ

TIERRA-A-017871
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: eLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: JU:le 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. ~~

5.7 Chromatography: review the blank raw datachromatograms (RICs), quant. reports or data

sys~em printouts and spectra. Is t~e

chromatographic perfor~ance (baseline stabili~y)

for each instrument accep~able for VOAs?

ACTION: Use professional judge!:ientto determine the

effect on the data.

5.8 Are all detected hits fc~ target compounds in

method, instrunent and s~orage blanks less than

the CRQL for t~at analy~e?

Exceotion: Acetone and 2-butanone ~us~ be less

than 5 times the CRQL, and nethylene chloride

must be less than 2.5 ti!:iesits CRQL.

ACTION: If no, an explanation and laboratory's

corrective actions rnus~ be addressed in the

case narrative. If ~he narrative contains no

explanation, then make a note in the Contract

Problems/Non-compliance section of the Data

Assessment.

6.0 contamination

NOTE: "Water blanks", "drill blanksll

, and "distilled

water blanksll are validated like any oth~=

sample, and are ~ used to qualify data. Do not

confuse them with the other QC blanks discussed

below.

6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent/s~orage blanks

have positive results (TCL and/or TIC) fer VOAs?

NOTE: When applied as directed in the table below, the

contaminant concentration in these blanks are

mUltiplied by the sample dilution factor and

corrected for %moisture when necessary.

NOTE: A contaminated instrument blank is not allowable

under this sow. See page D-48/VOA, section

12.1.2.4 for additional infor~ation. Document ir

the Data Assessment under Ccn~ract P~oble~s/NcnCompliance if contaminated inst~ument blank was

SUbmitted.

6.:2 Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive VOA

results (TCL and/or TIC)?

YES NO N/~.

I

rv(

r 1

TIERRA-A-017872
STANDARD OP::::RA!':::r::.l.~GPROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Me~hod: CLP/SOW OL~03.2

Da-:'e: J~:le :'996

SOP hw-E, Re'. ~:

YES 1';0

ACTION: Preoare a list of t~e saw=les associated wi~~

each of the c8n~a~inated blanks. (Attach a

separa-ce sheet.)

NOTE: All field blank results associated with a

particular group of samples (may exceed one pe~

case) must be used to qualify data. Trip blanks

are used to qualify only those samples with which

thev we~e shipned and are not rea~ired for

non:aaueous matrices. Blanks mav not be

qualified because of con"Caminati~n in another

blank. Field Blanks & Trip Blanks must be

qualified for sys~e~ monitoring compound,

inst~unen"C perfor~ance crite~ia, spectral or

calibra~ion QC prcble~s.

ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to

cualifv TCL results due to contamination. Use

the la=ges"C value from all the associated

blanks. I: any blanks are grossly

conta~inated, all associated data should be

quali::'ec. as u:;usable "R".

Fo:-:

Flag s~ple result

with a "D" when:

Report CRQL &

qualify "U" when:

No qualif~ca~ioD

is needed when:

Methylene

Chloride

Acetone

Toluene

2-3u~anone

Sample cone. is

> CRQL, but $ lOx

blank value.

Sample cone. is

< CRQL and $ lOx

blank value.

Sample cone. is

> CRQL and > lOx

blank value.

ether

Ccr."Car.:inan-:'s

Sample c=nc. is Sa:::Flec::nc. is Sample cene. is

> CRQL, but ~ 5x < C?QL and S; 5x > CRQL and > 5x

blank va~ue. blank value. blank va~ue.

NOT:::: Analytes qualified "U" for blank contamination

are s-:'illconside=ed as "hi":.s"when qualifying

for cali=ration c=i~e~ia.

ACTION: Fer T!C c8~Dcun~s, if the ccnce;.-:'rationin the

sample is less than five times the

concentration in the most contaminated

associa"Ced blank, flag o:he sanple data "R".

- 14 - 1"-'17

TIERRA-A-017873
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: June :'996

SOP HW-~, Rev. ~~

6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associatec

with every sample?

ACTION: For low level samples, note in the Data

Assessment that there is no associated

field/rinse/equipmen~ blank. For samples with

high concentrations of suspected blank

contaminants, use professional judgement to

qualify these values and make a note in the

Data Assessrnent~

Excection: samples tak~~ ==om a d~ink~ng ~ate~

tap do not have associated field blanks.

7.0 GC/MS Instrument Perfo~ance C~eck (Fo~ V)

7.1 Are the GC/MS Instrument Performance Che=k Forms

(Form V) present for B:-cmofluorcbenzene (EFE)?

7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and

mass/charge (m/z) listing for the EFB provided

for each twelve hour shift?

7.3 Has an instrument performance check been analyzed

for every analytical sequence on each

instrument?

ACTION: List date, time, ins~rument 10, and sample

numbers for which associa~ed GC/MS tuning data

are unavailable.

DATB TIME INSTRUMENT SAMPLE NUMBERS

ACTION: Notify the WAM to obtain missing data, if

possible. If the lab cannc~ provide the

missing data, reject, "R", all data generated

outside an acceptable tNelve hour calibra~ion

interval.

7.4 . Have the ion abundances teen normalized to rn/z 95 )

as specified in Exhibit 0, page D-56/VOA? _r_',_

NOTE: All ion abundance ratios rnus~ be nor~a~ized to

m/z 96, the nominal base peak, even thcuch ~~e

TIERRA-A-017874
STANDARD OP~RATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: J::.ne 1?96

SOP 5-6 Rev. 1

ion abundance ef ~/z l7~ may be up to 120% tha~

of rn/z 95.

ACTION: If mass assignme~t is in e~~or, qualify all

associated da-=.aas u:1usable "R".

7.5 Have the ien abundance criteria been rne~ for eac~

instrument used?

ACTION: List all da~a wnlcn do not meet ion a=undance

crite~ia (a~~ach a separa~e shee~).

'--' ACTION: If ion abundance cri~eria are not met, -=.he

Region II T?O must =e notified.

7.6 Are there any transcrip-=.ion/calculation errOrS

between mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least

two values, bu~ if errors are found check more.)

7.7 Is the nu~ber of significant figures for the

reported rela~ive abu~~ances consistent with the

nu~ber given fer eac~ ien in the ien abundance

criteria ecl~~~?

ACTION: If large errors exis~, take action as specified

in section 3.5 above.

7.8 Are the spectra of t~e ~ass calibration co~pounc

acceptable?

ACTION: Use professional jUdge~ent to dete~ine whether

associa-=.ed data should be accepted, qualified,

. - 0::- ~eJec-:.ec.

8.0 ~araet Comoound List (TCL) A~a~vtes (FO~~ I VOA)

8.1 Are 'the Crganic .~.r'lalysisDa~a Shee":s (Form I VO;'.)

presen~ wi~h requirec header info=illa~ion on each

page, for each of the following:

a. Sa~ples and/or f==s~~ons as appr~priate?

b. Matrix spikes and ma~=ix spike duplicates?

c. Blanks?

8.2 Are the VOA Rec8nst=uc~ed Ion C~rcma~ograrns, the

mass spec~ra for the identified cOffipounds, and

the data sys~em p=in~cu~s (quant. reports)

included in t~e s3mp~e ~ackage for each of the

TIERRA-A-017875
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region ~I

Method: CLP/SOW O~~03.2

Date: June 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 11

following:

~.-".

a. Samples and/or frac~ions as appropriate?

b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates

(mass spectra not required)?

c. Blanks?

ACTION: If any data are missing, take action spec:=ied

in 3.2 above.

8.3 Are the response fact=~S shc~n in the sua~t.

report?

8.4 Is chrcmatographic pe~:cr~ance acceptable wi~h

respect to:

a. Baseline stability?

b. Resolution?

c. Peak shape?

d. Full-scale graph (attenuation)?

e. Other: ?

-------------

ACTION: Use professional judgemen~ to determine the

acceptability of the data.

8.5 Are the lab-aenerated standard mass spectra cf

the identified VOA com~ouncs present for each

sample?

ACTION: If any mass spectra are ~issing, take ac~icn as

specified in 3.2 above. If the lab does not

generate its own standard spectra, docurnen~ in

the Contract Proble~s/Non-compliance section of

the Data Assessment and the Organic Regional

Data Assess~ent Summary.

8.6 Is the RRT of each repcrtee compound ~i~hin 0.06

RRT units of the standard RRT in the con~inuing

calibration?

YES NO N/A

r i

r l

/

rJ

Are all ions present in the standard mass .

spectrum at a relative intensity greater than 10% J

also present in the sample mass spectrum? r i

8.7

vr' P_)-"O

-/' -

TIERRA-A-017876
STANDARD O?ERATING PROCEDURE

US EFA Region II

Me~hod: CLF/SOW O~~03.2

Date: June 1996

SOP ~~-6, Rev. ::

8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities

agree within =20%?

ACTION: Use professional jUdgement to determine

accep~abili~y of data. If it is determined

that incorrect identifications were made, all

such data should be rejected "R", flagged "Nil

(presunptive evidence of the presence of the

compound) or changed to not detected "UII at the

calculated detec~ion limit. In order to be

positively identified, the data must comply

with tje criteria lis~ed in 8.6, 8.7, and 8.8.

ACTION: When samole carrv-over is suscected, use

professional jUdqemen~ determine if instrument

cross-con~amina~ion has affected positive

compound identi:ications.

9.0 Tentativelv Identified Comoounds (TIC)

9.1 Are all Ten~atively Identified Compound Forms

(Fc~ I ?a=~ 3) present; and do listed TICs /

include scan nu~ber or retention time, estimated

conce:1''c:-a-:iona1"'.d''IN" q-..:alifier? l.--

9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively

identified cO!:lpoundsand associated "best natchll

spectra included in the sample package for each

of the follo~ing:

a. Samples and/or frac~ions as appropriate?

b. Blan}:E?

c. Alkanes listed for each saLiple?

ACT:ON: I: any TIC da-:a a~e L.issing, take acticn

specified in 3.2 above.

ACTION: Add "JNII qualifie!" to all chernically named

TICs, ,- oissing.

9.3 Are any TCL c8npounds (:rcm any fraction) listed

as TIC ccnpounds? (~xanp~e: 1,2- dimethylbenzene

is xylene, a VOA TC~ analy~e, and should not be

repor~ed as a TIC.)

ACTION: Flag wit.!1IIR" any TCL cOmpound listed as a TIC.

9.4 Are all ions preser.~ ~n the !"eference mass

-, - % -p'~

TIERRA-A-017877
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: JU:le 1996

SOP KW-6, Rev. :: US EPA Region J:J:

Method: CLP/SOW O~~03.2

spectrum with a relative intensity greater than

10% also present in the san~le mass spec~run?

Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion

intensities agree with~n ±20%?

ACTION: Use professional judge~en~ to de~e~ine the

acceptability of TIC icentifications. If it is

determined an incorrec~ identification was

made, change the identification to "unknown,"

or to some less scecific icentification as

appropriate. (Ex~rnple: "CJ subs-:.ituted

benzene. II)

9.5

Also, when a cornpounc 1S not found in any

blank, but is detected in a sample and is a

suspected artifact of a common laboratory

contaminant, the resul-:.should be qualified as

unusable "R". (E.g., Common Lab contaminants:

CO2

(M/E 44), siloxanes (M/E 73) hexane, aldol

condensation products, solvent preservatives,

and related by-produc~s - see the National

Functional Guidelines fer further guidance.)

9.6 Are TICs with responses < 10% of the internal

standard (as determined by inspection of the peak

areas or height) reported?

ACTION: It yes, cross out questionable TIC(S).

10.0 Com~ound Quantitation and Reoorted Detection Limits

10.1 Are there any transcription/calculation errors in

Form I results? (Check at least tNO posi~ive

values. Verify that the correct internal

standards, quantitation ions, and ~qF were used

to calculate Form I resul~s.J

10.2 Are the CRQLs adjusted ~c reflect sample

dilutions and, for soils, sa~ple moisture?

ACTION: If errors .are large, take action as s;ecified

in section 3.5 above.

ACTION: When a sample is analy:ed at more t~an one

dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless a

QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher

CRQL data from the dilu~ed sample). Replace

concentrations that exceeded the calibration

range in the original analysis by crossing cut

-p - p.>z

YES NO N/A

/

7Ll

i

)

TIERRA-A-017878
STANDARD OPERA~INS p~OCEDaRE

US EPA Region II

Met~od: eLP/SOW Ok~03.Z

Da-:'e: June ~9~6

SOP h~-6, Rev. ::

the "Ell and i~s cor:-espcnc.J..ngvalue on the

original For~ I and su~s~i~uting the data frem

the diluted samole. Soecifv which Form I is to

~ be used, then d~aw a r~d IIX~ ac:-oss the entire

page of all Form Is not to be used, including

any in the data summary package.

11.0 standards Data (GCIMS)

11.1 Are the Recons~ruc~ed Ion Ch:-omatogra~s, and da~a

sys~em pr~n~outs (~uant. re~or~s) present for

each initial and co~~inuing cali==ation?

ACTION: If any calibration s~anda=d da~a a=e missing,

take ac~~on specified in 3.2 above.

12.0 GC!MS Initial Calibration (Fo=~ VI)

12.1 Are the Initial Calibra~ion ?or~s (Fo~ VI)

present and comple~e at concentrations of 10, 20,

50, 100, 200ng for separate calibrations of low

','a-"'''''/'''',:,'':; no '- __ J"t <:,..,,1 S (".., .... """' __ _40 • ..I..1_=- e- ....-,.:; '-=_ _ --::_ pu ........,:,)-nc' ,ow so;, s c. - --

(heated purge)?

ACTION: If any calibratien standard fo~s are missing,

take ac~ien specified in 3.2 above.

12.2 Were all low level soil standards, blanks and

samples analyzed by hea~ed pu~ge?

ACTION: If low level seil sa=~~es we~e net heated

during pu:-qe, quali:y positive hi-:s "3"

(es-:'i:nE.~e=) a~= n~:'.-d=-:e::-:s II~II.

12.3 Are the % ~elative s~ar.~ard devia~ion (%RSD)

values fer VOAs ~ 30% ever ~he c~~ce~~ra~ion

range ef the calibr=~ic~?

NOTE: Al~hough 11 VOA c~~~our.d~ have a ~ontrac":ual

minimum ?2F and no ~axi~uill%?SD, the technical

acceptance cri~eria are ~he sa~e for all

analytes.

ACTION: Circ~e all ou":liers ~:~h ~ed oer.~il.

ACTION: If %RSD is > 30.0%, qualify associated positive

results for that analyte IIJII (estimated) and

non-de~ec~s using professional jucgement. When

%RSD is > 90%, flag all nen-detects for that

analy-:€ "R" ('~nusable) anc. pos':'-:i ve hits "3".

- 2 0 - r.51

Y~S NO K/A

, . /

JJ-

,I

TIERRA-A-017879
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: J~ne 1~96

SOP HW-o, Rev. 11 US EPA Region II

Method: CLPjSOW OLM03.2

NOTE: Analytes previously qualified "V" for blank

contamination are still considered as "hits" when

qualifying for initial calibration criteria.

12.4 Are a~y average RRFs < 0.05?

ACTION: Circle all outliers wi~~ red pencil.

ACTION: If the averace RRF is < 0.05, then cualifv

associated n~n-detects \.;ithan "R" and flag

associated positive da~a as estimated IIJII.

),.'

NOTE: Contract Reauirement: The SOW allows up to tNO of

the reauired analytes to fail contractual %RSD or

RRF criteria, provided the %RSD is ~ 40% and ~q:

is ~ 0.010. (See Table 5, page D-59/VOA and

ana.lytes marked with a 11." on Form VI for

required analytes and contractual criteria.)

Technical criteria, however, are the same for all

analytes.

~CTION: If more than tHO analv~e5 failed %RSD or RR?

criteria, document in-the Data Assessment under

Contract Problems/Non-conpliance and the

organic Regional Data Assessment Summary.

12.5 Are there any transcription/calculation er=ors in

the reporting of average relative response

factors (RRF) or %RSD? (Check at least 2 values,

but if errors are found, check more.)

AC~ION: Circle errorS with red oencil.

ACTION: If errors are large, contact the W~1 to obtain

an explanation/resubmittal from the lab,

document in the Data Assess~ent under Contract

Problems/Non-Compliance and in the Organic

Regional Data Assessment Summary.

13.0 GC/MS Continuing Calibration (:or~ VII)

13.1 Are the Continuing Calicration Forms (Fo~ VII)

present and comolete for seoarate calibration of

low water/med s~il and low soil samples?

13.2 Has a continuing calibraticn standard been

analyzed for every t~elve hours of sample

analysis per instrument?

YES NO N/A

I

JTIERRA-A-017880
ST1ti~DARDOPFRA~ING ~ROC~DURE

US EPA Region II

Method: eLF/SOW OL~03.2

Date: June 199€

SOP Fw-6, Rev. 1:

ACTION: If any forns are wissing or no continuing

calib=a~ion standard has been analyzed within

twelve hours of every sa~ple analysis, con~ac~

the W~~ to reauest an exolanation/resubmittal

from the lab. - If c::m~inuing calibration data

are not available, flag all associated sample

data as unusable "R".

ACTION: List below all sanple(s) that were not analyzed

within twelve hours of the previous continuing

calibra~ion.

13.3 Do any volatile compounds have a percent

difference (%D) between ~he initial and

continuing R?F which exceeds the =25% criteria?

NOTE: Although :1 VOA compounds have a contractual

wini~um ?~F and nc maxinurn %D, the technical

acceptance c=i~eria are the same for all

analy~es.

AC~ION: Circle all ou~lie=s with red oencil.

ACTION: Quali:y both positive results and non-detects

for the outlier cOwpound(s) as estimated. When

%0 is > 90%, qualify all non-detects for that

analy~e unusa~le (R) and positive results

estiruated (J).

13.4 Are any ccn~inuing cali=raticn RRFs < 0.05?

ACTION: Circle all ou~lie=5 ~i~~ red Denail.

ACTION: If the ~~F is < 0.05, ~ualify the associated

non-det.ects as unusable "RII and the associated

positive values IIJ".

NOTE: CGnt~act Reauiremen~: The SOW allows up to two o~

t~e reau:~~d anc:y~e= to fail contractual %D a~d

RRF c~ite~ia, provided that the %0 is S 40% and

the RP.F is ~ 0.010. (See Table 5 pg. D-59/VOA or

analytes warked with a " ..II on For;n VI for

required ar.aly~es.) Technical criteria, howeve~,

a~e the sane for all ana~ytes.

YES NO ~/A

/,

TIERRA-A-017881
01

02

03

04

05

.06

-.07

)8

.09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

:7

:8

8A

VOLATILE INTER..'f\JALSTAND~~~D AREA }L~D RT SLJ1VIJ'liF..?'::·

~~ Name: SWL-TULSA Contrac~: 6o-~5-0026

:"'a~ Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601 S.~S No. : SDG Ko.: ;S=::::::

:"'ab rile ID (Standard): C25237.D Da~e ~~alyzed: OE/O~/9/

Instrument ID: C

GC Column:DB-624 ID: 0.53 (mo.) Heated Purge: (Y/Nl v

19

20

IS1(BCM) 152 (DFBl IS3 tCBZ) I

~! AREA # RT .:J AREA .:J RT .:J

'M' r. 'M' ;'.REA 'M'~I RT ~!

------------ ---------- ------------ ---------- ======= =;======== -_------- ....---- ==========1::==:== i

12 HOUR STD 270230 9.89 1229449 10.89 993340 -3 -- I

~ . .::..:

UPPER LIMIT 540460 10.39 2458898 11.39 1986580 l~ ,,-

1... 1

::.

LOWER LIMIT 135115 9.39 614724 10.39 496670 - - ,..-

~.j.,-';

============ ---------- ---------- ======= ======;=:::;:= ======= ==========1=======

I

EPA SAMPLE

=:========1==:====

No.

============ ---------- ======: ;::;::=:;::====== ------- ----------

-_ .... __ ... -

V3LK3 275793 9.90 3..255234 10.91 990297 13.::5

BSE27 200247 9.S7 844241 10.89 507935 13.::2

:eSE31 23~ 9.87 1072453 10.88 734422 13 -- - ..=~

BSE38 .____30*' 9.88 _-zt)127*' 10.88 -~ 13.=2

BSE43

:~

9.87 .... 293006::- 10.87 _:L5E~§; ~3 -- ,

'-==- 3SE37 '::J.~ _ 9.88 ~~6.11- lO.68 794859 ~~

.--

BSE38RE C2~.J!..LO~· 9.67 .;.929S~:...10.67 --2·.... 0..... ~ 13.::0 7C-7*

---- I

I

I

I

I

I

I

II

I

I

I

I

I 22

IS1 (BCM) = Bromochloromethane

IS2 (DFSJ = 1,4-Difluorobenze~e

IS3 (CBZ) = Chlorobenzene-d5

.~EA UPPER LIMIT = +100% of inter~al s~a~da~d a~ea

~~EA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of inte=~al standa=d area

RT UPPER LIMIT = + 0.50 minutes 0: ~nte=~al s~anda=d

RT LOWER LIMIT = - 0.50 minutes 0: ~Dte~nal s~andard

RT

p .....

..... .!.

# Cclumn used ~o flac values outside QC limi~s with an as~e=isk.

* Values outside of QC limits.

Jage 01 of 01

FORM VIII VOA OLYlC':= .0

68

TIERRA-A-017882
• 8}:..

VOLJl.TILE INTERNJl.L ST~.NDARD AREA AND RT SUMM.~Y

CcnC~ac~: 68-D5-0026

....a.:: ::Gce: SWOK SAS No.: SDG No.: 3S=:22

- -Date Analyzed: 08/06/97

:~s~~ument ID: L Time Analyzed: 1843

G: Column:DB-624 ID: 0.53 (mm) Heated Purge: (Y/N) v

1253506

2507012

626753

IS3{C3Z)

AREA # RT

12 HOUR STD

UPPER LIMIT

LOWER L2MIT

15~ (3eM) I

===~~:~==:==::==:

366771" 9.08

7335~2 9.58

183386 I 8.58

=~======== ===~===

152 (DFB)

AREA # RT #

10.27

10.77

9.77

1242418

2484836

621209

13.53

14.03

13.03

01 v3LK5 ~386S7

02 35£29 323622

03 B5E35RE 236793

04 BSE36RE 253616 I

05 3SE44RE 223298

06

------- ------ i ----

07 I 'J6 ----

09 ,----

~;-----,----1 10 I i I I I I-----I---I~~~-

9.06

9.03

9.'J2

9.03

9.04

============ ===::======== =======

;::=========== ==::~====== ======= ==~==:::::::=== =======

============ ---------- ---------- ==::::==== ========== ======= ========== =======

1391993 10.26 1407364 13.52

1006279 10.24 861627 13.51

.6·2"6731:.=- 10.23 '442921* 13.50

730844 10.23 (533978*! 13.50

670557 10.23 \4..6 6 0 "-t:; *: 13.50

E?ll. S""_fv1?::"'=:

No.

2.3

14, ~ I

:: ~-_=~-_=~-_=~-_-=.~-_--=.=~i:=_-==_-==_-=~--=~-_-_-_-_-_-_-I =========1 ===-=.~~- ,I ~-~ -~ -~ ~~~~ -~ -~ -~._ .=.II ======

2C

~ ~ 1 - I .-=--=--=--=--=--=--=-==== I 1----

17

S: (3CM) =

52 ID::='3)

53 ICBZl

.~~EAuP?E~ LIMZT

~~2A LOWE~ L!~2T

r..l U??ER LIM!T

?.:' I...JWE?:"IM:::T =

= -100% of in:~~~al s~andard area

= - 50% of in:ernal standard area

+ 0.50 minu~es of internal s~andard RT

- 0.50 mi~u~es of internal standard RT

..C81umn ~sed ~o

~ Values ou~side

:lac values ou~side

C

::. ;;,.. l;m;--- ..;.. 'x ..... _..I..~_I...'::: ..

QC lireits with an as~e~isk.

FORM V:II VOA OLM03.0

TIERRA-A-017883
8~.

VOLATILE INTERNAL STAND~..R.DAREA l:.NDRT SUM!":J._~Y

,ab Name: Si-1:w-TULSA Cont~ac~: 68-05-0026

.La;:' Code: SWOK Case No.: 25501 S.'A.S No.:

Lab File ID (Stan~ard): L27084.D Date ;~alyzed: 08/06/97

:~strument I~: L Time Analyzec: 1843

GC Column:DB-524 ID: 0.53 (:T.w) (Y/N) Y

01

02

03

O~

05

05

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

,_=,-

- ,..

.iO

17

18

19

20

21

221

------

IS1(BCM) 152 WFBI IS3{C3Z1

AREA # RT ~ AREA .l.: RT .u ;._t(E~..u RT ...

r. tr tr TT r.

============ ========== ======= ========~= ======= -===:;:=~==== =======

12 HOUR 5TD 366771 9.08 1253506 10.27 1242418 13.53

UPPER LIMIT 733542 9.38 2507012 10.77 2484836 14.03

LOWER LIMIT 183386 8.58 626753 9.77 621209 2.3.03

::::;:=========== ========== -------- =====::::::::::::::::::= -------

=========J =======

-----_ ..... -------

EPA SAM?LE

No.

============ =========;: :::::===== =======~:;:::= ===~=== ========== =======

VBLK1 438697 9.06 139199:< 10.26 140715 .;_ 13 .52

BSE46 'r24367* 9.04 ~3:M9'[ 10.23 <!..S·b 8 50 * 13 .50

BSE47 "'2·4·9·96~l· 9.02 689142 10.23 '-~'55:f13_*13.49

BSE48 346830 9.C2 1152751 10.23 .-819137 13.50

I I I I I

I I I I I

I I I

I I I I

I I I

I I I I

I I I I

I

I I I I

1 L I I

I I I I I

I I I I

I I I

I I I

I I I I

I I_- I I

i .

,

--_.

IS1 (BCM) = Bromochlorometha~e

I52 (DFB) = 1,4-Difluorobenze~e

153 (CBZ) = Chlorobenzene-d5

AREA UPPER LIMIT = +100% of i~ter~al standard area

~..R.EALOWER LIMIT = - 50% of in~er~al standard area

RT UPPER LIMIT = + 0.50 minu~es 0: internal standard R~

RT LOWER LIMIT = - 0.50 minu~es 0: internal standa~d ?T

# Column used to flaa values outsice QC l~mits with an aster~sk.

* Values outside of QC limits.

page 01 of 01

FOP.M V: I I VOA OLM03.0

.:.-.. I.

TIERRA-A-017884
STANDARD ~~RATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 11 US EPA Region II

M~-hod: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/A

ACTION: If more than t~o anal~

criteria document in t~

contract Problems/NOn-C

Organic Regional Data A

13.5 Are there any transcript:

the reporting of ~~F or %'

continuing RRFs? (Check'

if errors are found, chec;

- _ :. 2- ~_. ~;:J a::c R..~F,

- -=~.77:".E;~t u::c.er

-. ~ C:1 t::-=.

in

I

;:, - )

,:;'~ ACTION: Circle e::.-rors with :r:ed;

~

;;J-;. AC'!'ION:If errors are large, c::':

an explanation/resubmi~~

document in the Data As'

Problems/Non-comoliance

:'4..0Internal standard {For:n VII!}

...

14.1 Are the intern~l standar=

everv sample and blanlt;{Ii'

lirni~s (-~O% to ~lOO~) ~Z~·-

calibration?

.J /

If no, was the sample ~.-:

~.CTION:· 1. Circle all outl!4:=-S.....

2. List all the ou~~~r

Sample # Internal std.

~S~3S,4),3S.t~ I51- is '3

I

~<.S",? ~ MSj3S,. -...._

3(..44- 3)~t,

,

.......

I

·3~

I

3~.\f 4 ~Ilf:(4~)

l.i t; /!. £ IIn1\'\'D> --

I

(Attach additi~na~

or attach G=;sL

ACTION: If any sample was n~ ~

the Data Assessment unc

Problems/Non-Compliar.e"

;\.CTION:1. If the internal §!~'~:.l=::' <:.-

outside the upper o'E !:-f ..... -=.= . Ii:"'

all positive result~ ~~~~t~ta~~_

-.. f' 5'1 .-/,j -

:.5

...: .... •If _ 1..- ••

-

. _':':1 this

TIERRA-A-017885
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 11 US EPA Region II

Method: eLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO ~/A

internal standard.

2. Do not qualify non-detects when associated

IS area counts are> 100%.

3. If the IS area in the sample is below the

"lower limit," < 50%, qualify all analytes

associated with that IS estimated, "J". If the

area counts are extremely low, < 25% of the

area in the 12 hour standard, or if perforillance

exhibits a major abrupt drop- off, flag all

associated non-detects as unusable, "R", and

positive hits esti:r.tated,"J".

14. :2 Are the retention times of the internal standa=ds

within 30 seconds of the associated calibration

standard? J_

ACTION: Professional jUdgement should be used to

qualify data if the retention times differ by

more than 30 seconds.

NOTE: Contractual reauirements state that if anv inte=nal

standard fails-the acceptance criteria, the sa~ple

must be re-analyzed. If the affected sample was not

re-analyzed, document in the Data Assessment under

Contract Problems/Non-Conpliance.

NOTE: See Notes in section 3.4, page 7 for a descriotion

sample data the laboratory must submit.

of

15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for VOA

analysis?

15.0 Field DUDlicates

ACTION: Compare the reported results for field duplicates

and calculate the relative percent difference.

ACTION: Any gross variation bet~een duplicate results

must be addressed in the reviewer narrative.

However, if large diffe:ences exist,

identification of fielc duplicates should be

confirmed by contacting the sampler.

TIERRA-A-017886
SA

VOLATILE INTERNAL ST~~ARD AREA ANO RT SUM~~RY

;b Name: SWL-TULSA Conc~ac~: 68-D5-0026

Lao Code: SWOK Case No.: 2560: SAS Nc.: S~G No.: 35£22

~ao File 10 (Standard): L26983.0 Date .r-... 7\ l"la1 . 08/0-:'/<:;-, yzec:.: ~ ...

Instrumenc ID: L Time ~~~alyzed: 2257

GC Column:DB-624 1D: 0.53 (mm) Heated Purge: (Y!N) v

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

» 08

.

I IS1 (SCM) ~~~:~=:I=::~~;:~:

rc::- \C32) ~I _J

I

~.REA .L.:. RT .l1 ~.REA p..... .:.1

11" 11"1 .,... 1'T

=~========== ;========= ::::=::::::=== =======::== =====:;::;

I

12 HOUR STD 281029 9 12 945154 10.30 887009 13 ... ..,

.=c

UPPER LIMIT 562058 9

,....,

.0'<: 18903C8 10 .80 1774018 14 . C·B

LOWER LIMIT 140514 S .62 472577 9 .80 443504 13 OS

===::;==;:==== ========== ===;::=== ========== ======= ---------- ------_ .... ...--- =====::;=

EP.~ SPo,.L'1PLE

No. I

==========:= :::========= ======; ========== ======= ==::::::.:===== ========

VBLK2 315685 9 13 978302 10 .32 980154 13.50

ESE28 150485 9 OS 548":2C~ 10.29

..-3002

4

°113 .57

'-~2*·

. - - -.."

ESE28MS 149689 9 13 ""I: __ 10.34 '-3..S :1915-.....13.60

3SE28MSD 204370 9.12 b u.fS"25 10.32 456164 13 _59

I

..

09

10

11

12

13

14

,:;

--'

15

17

18

:.9

20

21

22

!Sl (BCM)=Bromochloromethane

IS2 (DFB) = 1,4-Difluorobenze~=

IS3 (C3Z) = Chlorobenzene-d5

pREA UPP~R LIMIT ~ +100% of in~=~nal s=ancard a~ea

~REA LOWER LIMIT = - 50% of ince~~al s~a~dard area

RT UPPER LIMIT ~ + 0.50 minuces of inte~nal standa~d RT

RT LOWER LIMIT ~ - 0.50 minutes of internal standard RT

~ Column used to flac values cu~sice QC limits wit~ an aste~isk.

* Values outside of QC limi~s .

.Jage 01 of 01

FORM VI I I VeA CLMO:;.O

7J

TIERRA-A-017887
8A

VOUo.TILE INTERN~.L STP-..ND1-.RDAEA ll..NDRT SUMrvt.Jl...?Y

3b Name: SWL-TULSA

Case No.: 25501 SAS No. :

Cont~act: 68-D5-0025

SDG :-.Ie.: =S=:22 Lab Code: SWOK

Lab File ID (Standard): L27044.D

Instrument ID: L

GC Column:DE-624 ID: 0.53

Dace ~~alyzed: 06/05/97

Time F~alyzed: 1349

(mm) Heated Pu~ge: (Y /Ni Y

IS1(ECM)

ll.R:::A#

241443

165436

214628

186629

225106

181173

U-ll67_--

109505*

72732* ...~_._---

============ ==========

12 HOtJR STD

UPPER L:MIT

LOWER LIMIT

260484

520968

130242

======::::====== :;======;:;:==

EP_Ds.Sll.MPLE

No.

============ ===~======

VBLK4

BSE43RE

BSE30

BSE32

BSE33

BSC:34

BSE35

BSE36

BSC:44

01

02

03

04

05

06

4"'":"'l07

,,;-\(08

...09

. 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22 1 _

: IS 3 '.C3 Z ) I .. II

RT ;; I _~R.:::;.. "! R'T' ;; I

========== =======:========== =======1

10.27 I 851314 I 1.3.54 I

'0 -7 17r-r~- _.1 i .}~':::~::J 1 ~--::.~"": I -. O' I

9 77 I 425657 i 13 04

========== ======='========== =======1 : I !

. I I

I i 1

===;~;9~9=:=~;~;~=I===;~;~~~=i=~~~~;=11

4 711 0 5 1 0 . 2 6 To? 4 67"'-' :'..3 ::4

6 02 3 16 10 .25 "4"?yO" ': 3- 13 .52

647676 10.25 451963 I 13 51

796415 10.26 676295 I 13 5~

698830 10.25 482352 13.52

424940 :0.2~ 3:S7:2~ 13.52

3275 :fj-'; 10 . 25 1 ?76 ? 5'" " ~2

_188341* 10.24 116262 7 :3.53..- ~.''-----

RT TT

IS2(DFSI

A.~EA #:

9.0S

9.::3

8 52

847322

:.694644

423661

::::======

9 06

9.06

9.eS

9.05

9 05

9.(05

9.05

9 O~

9.04

_____----1------1---- ___________ i 1 _

----- ----1-------11

IS1 (BCM) = Bromochloromethane

I52 (DFB) = 1,4-Difluorobenze~e

IS3 (CBZl = Chlorobenzene-d5

~~EA UPPER LIMIT

~~EA LOWER LIMIT

RT UPPER LIMIT =

R'!'LOWER LIMIT =

= +100% of i~~e~~al standard area

= - 50% of i~te~~al sta~dard a~~a

+ 0.50 minutes of int~~nal sta~ca~=

0.50 minutes of in:ernal s~ar.dard

KT

RoT

., # Column used to flag values outside QC limits with an as:~~isk .

.. J * Values outside of QC limits .

.....,.;

.age 01 of 01

FeR!"t V: I I VOA OLM03.C

72

TIERRA-A-017888
SA

VOLATILE INTE?S;'.L ST.r>..NDl>_';:(D .!L~E.;;' ;'.l~D RT Sl.J1"!lvL1i.RY

i..:.D C8de: SWOK C=.se Nc.: 25601

Con~~:.c~: 65-D5-0025

SDG Nc.: =S~..;;

!D Name: SWL-TULSA

Lab Da:e ..!i..;.-.alyzed:0 S / C I/ S:"7 ?ile ID (S~a~da~d)

GC Cclumn:DB-524 (mm)

Time ~~a~yzed: Oo~c

Hea~ed Pu~ge: (Y/Nl v

:~s~~ume~t ID: C

ID: o. ~.;

IS::' (~::M)

Jl.?.:=:.;;'

122 (DFB)

P-..REP-. #

:53 (C=.Z) I

AP..:=:?"'"I

i

==========l=======

625~7.1-, 10.81

~~:202i19:1:1· 10. eo

'3875JJL- 10.78

~-

_-?-"-;":3-.a..a. *- 1 0 79

..---- - ~

584950 10.77

649653

1299306

324826

I

1

============ 12 EOt.i"R STD

. u??E:? LI!'ET

LOWE? L:l"ET

========== ===~=== =====::::=:;::==

134594 9 77

2692.95 2.0 27

67:97 So 27

========~==::::::: ========== ====~== ==========

EP]>. S.~-,"'1P:"E

No

========:=== ===~~~:~:=1==~==8~_'= ..... "":u/..)"":: _

----~;:. ....I Co 79 '-......:_.:-;;-l _0 77 o-:~

~':30* f 9 78

~.::7"'O 3 -I 0 - - ----- - /":;,

01 VELK2

02

03

O<!

05

G6

C7021-------- 1-------

2S246RE

BSE47MS

BSE47MSV

V:-:3LK2

10 78

i i 28

.:.~28

.... _----_ ....

-------

==:~~~~~~=I=::=~~=

10766~";' II ,. C'"'

26?174. 1 2.2 ;-.:; ,

==========j=======,

I I

===~~~~~~=I=~;=~~=I'

~:"34l

..........--.2 :'- -:;:::' i ':: 0 '::- ~....,I"h ': .::.?

• w ~ _ ~ ::J /_ _ --

'- 11224:::J...!13 42

~. _o:1V-,"- . __ .. - I 1. '0

i

------! -----1

i

------ i ----·1 09

:0 I

11 j----

12 'I'------- 1 , _

13 I

1-------- l4 1--------

20

. ""' -~1-------- 1617 1-------- 1-------

:8 ----·1------

---I~- ..,-/ '

<--

22

,--------

~51

:52

~S3

(BCM)

(DrB)

(CB2)

= Brcmochlcrome~hane

= 1,4-Di:luc~8~enzene

= ChloroDe~ze~e-c5

___ I

~.?.~A U??~R LIMIT = +100% cf inte~~al standard a~ea

~~~A LOWE:R LIMIT = - 50% of in~er~al s~andard a~ea

~~ UPF:=:RLIM!7 = ~ 0.50 ~~nuces 0= i~te~nal s~=.~da~d R~

~: LOW~R ~IM:T = ~ O~50 ~~nutes of in:er~al sta~darc RT

..Column used to flac values outside QC l~~its w~th an as:e~isk.

* Values ou~side of QC li~i:s.

!;Ci9"€ 01 of 02

FORM VI2! VOp.. CLM02.0

.1 ? -

... ::J

TIERRA-A-017889
STANDARD ~PERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

SOP Hft-6, Rev. 11

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW O~~03.2

YES NO N/A

PART B: BNA !EALYSES

1.0 sam~le Conditions/problems

1.1 .00 the Traffic ReDor~~/Chain-of-Custody records

or laboratory SDG·Nar,i~tive indicate any problems

with sample receipt, ~~ndition of samples,

analytical problems 6~ special notations

affecting the quality pf t~e data?

\ / ,.,

~ , .

If any sample anal.yz~d as a soil, ot:le:-than 1C,,",,,~L_\. T'.···-f '

TCLP, contains 50% - 90% water, all data should

be flagged as estima~ed "J". If a soil samnle,

other than TCLP, con~ains more than 90% water,

all data should be qt;.:.alifiedas unusable UR".

ACTION: If samples were not i~ed or if the ice was

melted upon arrival a~ the laboratory and the

temperature of the co~le~ was elevated (> 10°

C), flag all positive results "J" and all nondetects "UJ".

ACTION:

2.0 Eoldina Times

2.1 Have any BNA technical nolding times, determined

from date of collection to date of extraction,

been exceeded?

Technical Holdina Time: continuous ext~action of

water samples for BNA analysis must be started

within seven days of th~ date of collection.

Soil/sediment sam~les must be extracted within 7

days of collection. E~~racts must be analyzed

within 40 days of the 4ste of extraction.

Table ot Hol4i~a Time Violations

(See ChainMoi-Custody Records)

Sali1.ple

.~.:1alyzed

Sample

Matrix

Date

Sampled

Date Lab

Received

Date

Extracted

Date

Analyzed

-

TIERRA-A-017890
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Dat.e: June ="'?9t

SOP hloi-6t Rev.

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

ACTION: If technical holding ti~es we~e exceeded, flag

all positive results as estimated (J) a~d sa~Dle

auantitation limits as estimated (UJ), and

document in the narrative that holding times we~e

exceeded. If analyses were done more than 14

days beyond holding tine, either on the first

analysis or upon reana2ysis, the reviewer must

use p=ofessional judgement to dete~ine the

reliability of the data and the effects of

additional sto=age on sample results. At a

minimum, all results should be qualified "J", bu~

the revie'...:e=may deter-=:ine that non-detect data

are unusable "RII. If holding times we~e exceeded

by more than 28 days, all non-detect data must be

qualified IIR", unusable.

...

NOTE: Contractu~l Hold;~c Ti~es: Extraction of water

samples must be s~arted within 5 days VTSR.

Soil/seciment samples must be extracted within 10

days of V:'SR. T::'isr-equi=-ement does not apply to

Perfcrnance Evalua~ion {PEl samples. Water and

soil/seci~e~t ex~rac~s must be analyzed within 40

days following ex~=action.

AC~ION: If ccn~ra=tual holding ~imes are exceeded,

document in the Da~a Assessment and on the

Organic Regional Da~a Assessment Summary fo~ ..

NOTE: The data reviewer must nete in the Data Assessment

whether or not technical and contractual holding

times were met.

3.0 Surrocate Recoverv (Form II)

3.1 Are BNA Sur~oqate Recovery Summaries (Fo~ II)

present :or eac~ of ~he follOwing matrices:

a. Low V,'a~e~?

b. Low Soil?

c. Mea Soil?

:3.2 Are all ~~e SNA samples l~steQ on ~he appropriate

Su~~oga~e Recovery sUN~arie~ for each of the

followinq matrices:

a. Low Water?

b. Lcw Soil?

TIERRA-A-017891
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June :'..996

SOP Fft-6, Rev. ::

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

c. Med Soil?

ACTION: Contact the WAM to recuest an exolanation or

resubmittal of any missing deliverables from

the laboratory. If missing deliverables are

unavailable, document the effect in the Data

Assessment.

3 .3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk?

ACTION: Circle all outliers with red pencil.

3.4 Were two or more base-neutral OR acid surrogate

recoveries out of specification for any sample or

method blank?

If·yes~ were samples reanalyzed?

Were method blanks reanalyzed?

ACTION: If all BNA surrogate recoveries are ~ 10%, but

two within the base-neutral or acid frac~ion do

not meet SOW soecifications, for the affe~~ed

fraction onlv (i.e. acid or base-neutral

comoounds) :

1. Flag all positive results as estimated (J).

2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection

limits ("UJ") when recoveries are less than the

lower acceptance limit.

3. Do not qualify non-detects if recoveries are

greater than the upper acceptance limit.

If any base-neutral or acid surrogate has a

recovery of < 10%:

1. Qualify positive results for that fraction

as estimated (J).

2. Qualify non-detects for that fraction as

unusable (R).

Professional judgement should be used to

qualify data that have method blank surrogate

recoveries out of specification in both

original and reanalyses. Check t~e inter~al

standard areas.

-fi - p.6{'

Y:;::S NO N/A

r 1

/

.J

,

r .j

r ' ./.

j

r 1

TIERRA-A-017892
STANDARD OPERA~I~G PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: eLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: J"U::le 199£

SOP HW-6, Rev. ::

NOTE: Cantract~al recuirements state that if anv

surrogate fails acceptance criteria, the sample

must be re-analyzed. If sample was not reanalyzed, document in the Data Assessment under

Contrac~ Problems/Non-Compliance.

NOTE: The laboratory must submit the following data:

1. If surrooate recoveries and internal standard

responses meet the acceptance criteria in the reanalyzed sa=ple, then the laboratory must submit

only the re-analysis.

2. If surroga~e recoveries and/or internal

standard responses fail to meet the acceptance

criteria ~pon re-analysis, then submit data frem

both analyses.

3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors

between ra~ data and Form II?

AC~:QN: If large errors exist, contact the WAM to

reques~ an explanation or resubmittal of

correc~ed de1iverables from the laboratory.

Make necessary corrections and nete errors in

the Data Assessment.

4.0 Matr~x Soikes (Fo~ III)

4.1 Is the Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate

Recovery Fo~ (:orm III) present?

. - ., ." Kere ~a~rix spikes a~alyzed a~ the re~ired

frequency for each of the following matrices:

a. Low Wa~er?

b. Low Soil?

c. Med Soil?

AC~!ON: If any matrix spike data are missing, take the

action specified in 3.2 above.

4.3 How many BKA spike recoveries are o~~side QC

limits?

Wate:- Soils

ou~ of 22 out of 22

YES NO }i/;

r 1

TIERRA-A-017893
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

SOP ~-6, Rev. ::

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO }ijA

4.4 How many RPDs for matrix spike and matrix soike

duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?

Water Soils

ess.;.~ 3 out of 11 " out of 11

D ~/"

ACTION: No action is taken based upon MS/MSD data

alone. However, using informed professional

jUdgement, the data reviewer may use the matrix

spike and matrix spike duplicate results in

conjunction with other QC criteria and

determine the need for some qualification of

the data.

ACTION: Circle all outliers with red pencil.

5.0 Blanks (Fo~ IV)

5.1 Is the Method Blank SUIT~ary (Form IV) present?

5.2 Frecruencv of Analvsis: Has a reagent/method

blank analysis been reportee per 20 samples

similar matrix, or concentration level, and

each extraction batch? .

of

for

5.3 Has a BNA method blank been analyzed for each

GC/MS system used? (See SOW pg. D-54/SVOA,

section 12.1.2.)

- - /

ill

ACTION: If any method blank data are missing, con~act

the WAM to obtain an explanation/resubmittal

from the lab. If resubrnittals are unavailable,

use professional jUdgement to determine if the

associated sample data shculd be qualified.

5.4 The validator should verify that the correct

identification scheme for the EPA Blank sa~ples

were used. See page B-33, sec. 3.3.7.3 of the

SOw for further information.

Was the correct identification scheme used for J

all BNA blanks? r •

ACTION: Contact the WAM to obtain resubmit~als from the

lab or make the required corrections on the

forms. Document all corrections made bv ~he

validator in the Data Assessment unde~ conc~2c~

Problems/Non-Compliance.

_ ~.- p.;gTIERRA-A-017894
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW Ok~03.2

Date: June 1!?9t:

SOP HW-6, Rev. ::

YES bO 1c- ; ..

,1.'\/ r.

5.5 Chroma~ocraDhv: review the blank raw data -

chromatograms (RICs), quant. reports or data

system printou~s and spectra. Is the

chrornatocranhic oerformance (baseline stability)

acceptabie for e~ch instrument?

ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the

effec~ on the data.

5.6 Are all de~ec~ed hits for target compounds less

than the CRQL for that analy~e in all method

blan}:s?

Ex=e~~icu: Phthalate esters must be less than

five tines (5x) the CRQL.

6.0 Conta~ination

NOTE: "Water blan}:s", "d::-il1blanks" and "distilled

w"ater bL~:1ks" are val idated like any other sample

and are ~o~ used ~o ~ualify data. Do not confuse

the~ wi~~ ~he o~her QC blanks discussed below.

6.1 Do any ~e~hod/reagent blanks have positive

resul~s (TCL and/or TIC)? / r 1

llCTE: Water: When a=~li~d as direc~ed in ~he table below

(page 29), the- contaminant concen~ration in method/

ins~rurnen~/reaqent blanks is mul~iplied by the sample

dilu~ion fac~or, where necessary.

Soil: If the lab has no~ already done so, the

c:m~a;:'\i:"'.ar:~c::;nce!'l~=ationin soil blanks is

mul~iplied by 33 tiwes the sample dilution facto~ and

cor=ected =or %mois~u=e (fraction of solid) whe=e

necessary. 30 gra~s of sodium sulfate (1 gram for

medium level soils) a=e used to prepare the soil

reagent/we~hod blank as instructed on page D-54/SVOA,

sec~ion 12.1.2. Contact the WAM to obtain

resubmi~~als if the soil blanks are not reported in

soil uni~s (~g/kg).

6.2 Do any field/~inse blanks have positive BNA

resul~s (TeL a~d/cr TIC)?

I

j

ACT:ON: Prepare a list of samples associated with each

con~anina:.ed blank. (Attach a separate sheet.)

NOTE: All field blank results associated to a particular

group of sanples (nay exceed one per case) must be

TIERRA-A-017895
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

SOP hw-6, Rev. ~: US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLH03.2

YES NO N/A

used to qualify sample data. Do not conve~t field

blank results to account for the diffe~ence in soil

CRQLs. Blanks may not be qualified because of

contamination in another blank. Field blanks illUStbe

qualified far surrogate, spectral I instrument

performance or calibration QC problems.

ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below tc

qualify TCL results due to contamination. Gse

the largest value from all the associated blanks.

If gross contamination exists, all data in t~e

associated samples should be qualified as

unusable IfR".

Flag sample result Report CRQL & No qualificat:'o~

For: with a "u" when: qualify "u" when: is needed when:

Common Sample conc. is Sample conc. is Sa=.ple cenc. is

Phthalate- > CRQL, but :S lOx < CRQL and :S lOx > CRQL and > lOx

-sters blank value. blank value. blank value.

Other Sample conc. is Sample conc. is Sa::oplecenc. is

Conta- > CRQL, but S 5x < CRQL and :S 5x > CRQL and > 5x

minants blank value. blank value. blank value.

NOTE: Analytes qualified "U" for blank contamination

are still treated as "hitslf when qualifying for

calibration criteria.

ACTION: For TIC compounds I if the concentration In t~e

sample is less than five times the

concentration in the most contaminated

associated blank, flag the sample data URII

(unusable) .

Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks

associated with every sample?

6.3 _r_, ,;

"

~CTION: For low level samples, note in the Data

Assessment that there is no associated

field/rinse/equipment blank. For analy~es ~ith

high concentration, use professional jUdgeme,,~

on qualification of these values and make a

note in the Data Assessment.

Excention: samples taken from a drinking wa~e~

tap do not have associated field blanks.

TIERRA-A-017896
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLF/SOW OL.."'f03.2

Date: June 1.99€

SOP HW-6, Rev. ::

7.0 GC!HS !nst=ument Performance Check

7.1 ...Are the GC/MS lnstru~ent Perforwance Check Forms

(Forw V) present fo= Decafluorotriphenylphosphine

(DFT??)?

7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and

nass/charge (m/z) listing for the DFTPP provided

for each twelve hour shift?

7.3 Has an i~s~~uwent perfo~ance check solution been

analyzed :or every twelve hours of sample

analysis pe~ ins~runent?

ACTION: List da~e, t~rne, i~strurnent lD, and sample

nu~er for wnlcn no associated GCjMS tuning

da~a are valid.

SA.I1PLE NUM3ERS DATE TIY.E INSTRUMENT ID

ACTION: ~r ~ne w~~ cannot obtain missing data from the

lab, reject "~" all data generated outside an

ac=ep~able twelve hour calibration interval.

Eave the ion a=undar.=es been nc~.al~=ed to rn/z

198 (see SQW, page D-61/SVOA)?

NOTE: All ion azundance ra~ics must be normalized to

m/z 198, ~he norr.inalbase peak, even though the

ion abundance of m/z 442 may up to 110% that of

m/z 198.

AC~ION: If mass assignrnen~ is in error, flag all

associa.':ed sample data as unusable "R".

'7 • 5 Eave the ion abundance c~iteria D~en met for each

ins~rurnen'tused?

ACTION: Lis~ all data which do not meet ion abundance

cri~e~ia (attach a sepa~ate sheet).

- 32 - p. iq

YES 1-<0 .........

~'I ~.

J

r '1

.1'

f Vi

,

r .•1

TIERRA-A-017897
STANDARD OPERATrNG PROCEDURE

Date: June ~996

SOP n~-6, Rev. :: us EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/A

ACTION: If ion abundance criteria are not met, the

Region II TPO must be notified.

7.6 Are there any transcription/calculation e=rors

between mass lists and Form Vs? (C~eck at least

tHO values, but if errors are found c~eck wore.)

7.7 Is the "number of significant figures for tl1e

reported relative abundances consiste~t wit~ the

number given for each ion in the ion abundance

criteria column?

ACTION: If large errors exist, take action as spec::ied

in section 3.5 above.

7.8 Are the, spectra of the mass calibration c~wpcund

acceptable?

/

j

_r_'

ACTION: Use professional judgement to dete~ine whet~er

associated data should be accepted, qualified,

or rejected.

8.0 Ta~=et COIDDound List (TeL) Analvtes (FO~~ I SV)

8.1 Are the organic Analysis Data Sheets (Fo~ I SV)

present with required header information on each

page, for each of the following:

;'

a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate? ~

-

b. Matrix spi~es and matrix spike duplicates? ~

I

c. Blanks? ~

8.2 Has GPC cleanup been perfo~ed en all soil/

sediment sample extracts? r !i

-...--

ACTION: If data suggests that G?C was not perfo~ed,

use professional judgement. Make note in

Contract Problems/Non-compliance section 0: the

Data Assessment and the organic Re;ional Da~a

Assessment su~~ary.

8.3 Are the BNA Reconstructed Ion Chromatogra~s~ ~he

mass spectra for the identified compounds, and

the data system printouts (quant. repor~s)

included in the sample package for each of t~e

following:

a. Samples and/or frac~ions as apprcp=:a~e?

TIERRA-A-017898
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: June 1996

SOP hw-6, Rev. :1

b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates

(mass spec~~a not required)?

c. Blanks?

ACTION: 1= any data are missing, take action specified

in 3.2 above.

8.4 Are the response fac~ors shown in the quant.

report?

8.5 Is chrowc~ographic perfo=mance acceptable with

respect to:

Baseline sta=ili~y?

Resolution?

Peak shc'De?

Full-scale graph (at~enuation)?

Other: ?

YES NO KIA

./

r v,

r ,

r ,

ACTION: Use professional jUdgement to determine the

accep~cbility of the data.

8.6 Are lab-aenerated standard mass snectra of J.

identified BNA compounds present for each sample? _r__..

ACTION: If any illassspectra are missing, take action

specified in 3.2 above. Note under Contract

Non-cowpliance if.lab does not generate their

own standard spectra. If spectra are missins,

reject all positive data.

~ ..,

o. , Is the ?~T of each repor~ed compound within 0.06

RRT uni~s of the standard RRT in the continuing

calibration?

8.8 Are all ions present in the standard mass

spectru~ at a relative intensity greater than 10%

also present in the sample mass spectrum?

8.9 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities

agree within ±20%?

ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine

acceptability of data. If it is determined

that incorrect identifica~ions were made, all

TIERRA-A-017899
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

~ethod: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: June 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 11

YES NO :HIA.

such data should be rejected "R", flagged "N"

(presumptive evidence of the presence of the

compound) or changed to not detected "u" at the

calculated detection limit. In orde~ to be

positively identified, the data must comply

with the criteria listed in 8.7, 8.8, and 8.9.

ACTION: When sample carry-ove~ is a possibility,

professional judgement should be used to

determine if instrument c=oss-contamination has

affected any positive compound iden~ificaticn.

9.0 Tentatively Identified Compounds (TTC)

9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms

(Form I, Part B) present: and do listed TICs

include scan number or retention time, estimated

concentration and IfJN" qualifier?

9.2 Are the mass spectra fer t~e tentatively

identified compounds and associated "best match"

spectra included in the sample package for each

of the following:

a. samples and/or fractions as appropriate?

b. Blanks?

c. Alkanes listed for each sample?

ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action

specified in 3.2 above.

ACTION: Add "N" qualifier to all chemically named TICs,

if missing.

9.3 Are any TeL compounds (from any fraction) listed

as TIC compounds? (Example: 1,2-dimethylbenzene

is xylene - a VOA TCL - and should not be

reported as a TIC.)

ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC.

9.4 Are all ions present in the referer.ce mass

spectrum with a relative intensity greater than

10% also present in the sample mass spectrum?

9.5 Do TIC and "best matchll standard relative ion

intensities agree within ±20%7

l

r, ~ L

r ~ ./

TIERRA-A-017900
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

US EPA Region II SOP HW-6, Rev. ::

Methoc: CLP/SOW Oh~03.2

YES :hO 2"/:;\

ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the

acceptability of TIC identifications. If it is

determined that an incorrec~ identification was

made, change the identification to. "unknown, II

or to some less specific identification

(example: IIC3 substituted benzene") as

appropriate. Also, when a compound is not

found in any blank, but is a suspected artifact

of a common laboratory contaminant, the result

should be qualified as unusable, "RII

.

9.6 Are any TICs with responses < 10% of the internal

standard (as dete~ined by inspection of the peak

areas or height) reported?

ACTION: If yes, cross out questionable TIC(s).

10.0 C~~nound ouantitation and Reoorted Detection Limits

10.1 Are there any transcription/calculation errors in

:o~ I results? (Check at least two positive

values. Verify tha~ the correct internal

s~andard, ~~antitation ion, and RRF were used to

calculate Fo~ I result.)

10.2 Are the C~QLs adjusted to reflect sample

dilutions and, for soils, sample moisture?

ACTION: If errors are large, take action as specified

in section 3.5 above.

AC~:ON: wne~ a sa~?le is analyzed at more than one

cilu~ion, the lOwes~ CRQLs are used (unless a

QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher

CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis).

Replace concentra~ions that exceed the

calibration range in the original analysis by

cr::::ssingout the "E" and its associated value

on the original Fo~ I and SUbstituting the

data from the analysis of the diluted sample.

specify which Form I is to be used, then draw a

red "X" across the entire page of all For;n Is

~hat should not be used, including any in the

sur:::::arypac}:age.

11.0 standards Data (GC/MS)

Are the Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, and data I

syste~ printouts (quant. reports) present for

initial and continuing calibra~ion? r 1

11. 1

TIERRA-A-017901
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

SOP liW-6, Rev. ~l US EPA Region II .

~athod: CLP/SOW O~~03.2

YES NO N/A

ACTION: If any calibration standard data are missing,

take action specified in 3.2 above.

12.0 GC/MS Initial Calibration (Porm VI)

12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI)

present and complete for the BNA fraction?

ACTION: If any calibration standa~d forms are missing,

take action specified in 3.2 above.

12.2 Are the % relative standard deviation (%RSD)

values for BNAs ~ 30% over the concentration

range of the calibration? _r_1 J

ACTION: Circle all outliers with red penci'.

NOTE: Although 21 BNA compounds have a contractual

minimum RRF and no maximum %RSO, the technical

criteria are the same for all analytes.

NOTS: Eight BNA compounds do not require a 20ng

standard. Refer to SOW sec~ion 7.2.4.5.1, page

D-1SjSVOA for a list of required compounds and

contractual criteria.

ACTION: If the %RSD is > 30.0%, qualify positive

results for that analyte "J" and non-detects

using professional jUdgement. When %RSD is >

90%, flag all non-detect results for that

analyte "R" (unusable) and all positive results

"J" (estimated).

NOTE: Analytes previously qualified "U" due to blank

contamination are still considered as "hits" when

qualifying for calibration c~iteria.

12.3 Are any average RRFs < O.OS?

AC'!'ION:Circle all outliers with red penci.l.

1-.CTIeN:If the ave'rage RRF is < 0.05 then:

1- "R" all non-detects.

2 • IIJ" all positive results.

12.4 Are there any transcription/calculation errors in

the reporting of RRFs and/or %RSDs? (Check at

least tHO values: if errors are found check more.)

K';;' po1-€.

- /~ I -

TIERRA-A-017902
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: eLP/SOW O~~03~2

Date: June 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. ::

ACTION: Circle e=rors wi~h red pencil.

ACT~ON: If errors are large, take action as specified

in sec~ion 3.5 above.

NOTE: Contract Reauireme~t: The SOW allows UD to four

of the rerruired analytes to fail contractual %RSD

or ~qF criteria provided the %RSD is ~ 40% or RRF

is ~ 0.010. (See Table 5, page D-66jSVOA and

ana1ytes "'larked wi -:.ha II _" on Form VI for a list

of required analytes and contractual criteria.)

Tec~nical cri~eria, however, are the same for all

analytes.

ACTION: If mere than four analytes fail %RSD or RRF

criteria, document in the Data Assessment under

Contract Problems/Non-Compliance and on the

organic Regional Data Assessment Summary forw.

13.0 GCIY.S continuinc Cal;bration (Porm VII)

13.1 Are the Cont~nuing Calibration Forms (Form VII)

present and conple-:.efor the BNA fraction?

13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been

analyzed for every twelve hours of sample

analysis per inst~~ment?

ACTION: Lis~ below all saillpleanalyses that were not

analyzed within ~~elve hours of a continuing

calibration standard for each ins~r~ment used.

ACTION: If any forms are wissing, or no continuing

calibration standard has been analyzed within

twelve hours of every sample analysis, contact

the W~~ to obtain an explanation/resubmittal

from the lab. I: continuing calibration data

are ~navailable, flag all associated sa~ple

data as unusable "RI!.

13.3 Does any BNA compound have a percent diffe~ence

(%0) bet~een the initial and continuing

calibration RRFs which exceeds the ±25.0%

criteria?

_.n_p.7-7

YES NO NjA

rJ

~/Ll

TIERRA-A-017903
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

us EPA Region II

Method: eLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: June ~996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 11

ACTION: Circle all outliers with red pencil.

ACTION: Qualify both positive results and non-detec~s

for the outlier comoound(s) as estimated ItJ".

When %D is > 90%, reject all non-detects for

that analyte, "R", and qualify positive results

"J" (estimated).

~3.4 Are any continuing RRFs < 0.05?

ACTION: Circle all outliers with red pencil.

ACTION: If the RRF is < 0.05, qualify as unusable (R)

associated non-detects and "J" associated

posit~ve values.

NOTE: Contract Reauirement: The SOW allows UD to four

of the recruired analytes to fail contractual %D

and RRF criteria, provided that the %0 is ~ 40%

and the RRF is ~ 0.010. (See Table 5 page 0-

66/SVOA or analytes marked with a "-" on Form VI

for a list of the required analytes.) Technical

criteria, however, are the same for all analytes.

ACTION: If more than four analytes failed %D and RRF

criteria, document in the Data AssesSwent under

Contract Problems/Non-compliance and on the

organic Regional Data Summary Form.

13.5 Are there any ,transcription/calculation errors in

the reporting of average relative response

factors (RRF) or %difference (%D) between initial

and continuing RRFs? (Check at least tNC values,

but if errors are found, check more.)

ACTION: Circle errors with red pencil.

ACTION: If errors are large, take action as specified

in section 3.5 above.

14.0 Internal Standards (Form VIII)

14.1 Are the internal standard areas (Fc~ VIII) of

every sample and blank within the upper and lower

limits (-50% to +100%) for each continuing

calibration?

If no, was sample re-analyzec?

_~ _ r·:rSYES NO 1i1?!.

I

w'

r ,

1\

i ',,,--

1

1

#

TIERRA-A-017904
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

US EPA Region II SOP HW-6, Rev. 11

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/A

ACTION: 1. Circle all outliers with red nencil.

2. List all the outliers below.

ACTION: If sanple was not reanalyzed, document in Data

Assessillent in Contract problems/Non-compliance.

Sample if Internal std. Area Lower/Upper Limit

/

I

/

I

(Attach additional sheets if necessary.)

(or attach copies of Form VIlIs)

ACTION: 1. If the internal standard area count is outside

the lIuppe:::-"or 1I10wer" limit, flag with "J" all

positive results and non-detects quantitated with

this internal standard.

2. Do not qualify non-detects associated with IS

area> 100%.

14.2

3. If the IS area in the sample is < 50%, qualify

all analytes associated with that IS estimated

(J). If area counts are extremely low « 25% of

the a:::-eain the 12 hour standard), or if

perfo~ance exhibits a major abrupt drop-off,

flag all associated non-detects as unusable (R)

and pcsitive hits estimated (J).

Are the reten~ion times of the inte:::-nalstandards J_: within 30 seconds of the associated calibration

standard?

ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to

qualify data if the retention times differ by

more than 30 seconds.

NOTE: Contrac~ual requirements state that if any

internal standard fails the acceptance criteria,

the sample must be re-analyzed. If the affected

sample was not re-analyzed, document in the Data

Assessment unqer Contract Problems/NonCompliance.

TIERRA-A-017905
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1.996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 1.1. US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/A

NOTE: See Notes in section 3.4, page 24 for a

description of sample data the laboratory must

sUbmit.

15.0 Field DUDlicates

15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for BNA

analysis?

ACTION: Compare the reported results for field

duplicates and calculate the relative percent

difference.

ACTION: Any gross variation be~Neen field duplicate

results must be addressed in the reviewer

narrative. However, if large differences

exist, identification of field duplicates

should be confirmed by contacting the sampler.

-i.'

TIERRA-A-017906
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 199t

SOP BW-6, Rev. 1: US EPA Reqion II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

PART C: PESTICIDE/PCB ANALYSIS

1.0 Samole Conditions/Problems

1.1 Do the Traffic Reports/Chain-of-Custody Records

or SDG Narrative indicate any problems with

sample receipt, condition of the samples,

analytical problems or special circumstances

affecting the quality of the data?

ACTION: If any sample ana~yzed as a soil, other than

TCLP, contains 50% - 90% water, all data should

be aualified as es~imated uJu. If a soil

sample, other than TCLF, contains more than 90%

water, all data should be qualified as unusable

"R ".•

ACTION: If samoles were not iced, or if the ice was

melted-upon arrival at the laboratory, and the

temperature of the cooler was elevated > 10° C,

flag all positive results "J" and all nondetects "UJ".

ACTION: Check aqueous extraction log for sample pH,

adjustment was needed, it should have been

noted in the SDG Narrative. If more

information is needed, notify the WAM to

contact the lab.

2.0 Holdin~ Times

2.1 Have any PEST/PCS technical holding times,

determined fro~ date of collection to date of

extraction, been exceeded?

NOTE: Tec~nical Holdinc Times: Water and soil samples

for PEST/PCB analysis must be extracted within 7

days of the date of collection. Extracts must be

analyzed within 40 days of the date extraction.

ACTION: If technical holding times are exceeded, flag all

positive results as estimated UJII and sample

quantitat:"on limits "UJ" and document in the

narrative that holding times were exceeded. If

analyses were done more than 14 days beyond

holding time, either on the first analysis or

upon re-analysis, the reviewer must use

professional judgement to determine the

reliability of the da~a and the effects of

- ~42 - r·~1

YES NO l;/;

TIERRA-A-017907
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Date: June 1996

US EPA Region I:t SOP EW-6, Rev. 11

Method: CLP/SOW Ok~03.2

YES NO N/A

additional storage on the sample results. At a

minimum, all the data should at least be

qualified IIJ1I, but the reviewer may dete:rmine

that non-detects are unusable "R".

Table of Holdina Time Violations

(See Chain-of-Custody Records)

sample Sample Date Date Lab Date Date

Analyzed Matrix Sampled Received Extracted Analyzed

6SZ J.~,). ';).~i ~ 1/~~1~7 7hJ~7 O//S~7 J'~ oJ /;,?

~ ',i 1.\.'" l~ )/ J/ J/ J,

;)', [;>

NOTE: contractual Holdinc Times: Extraction of water

samples must be completed within 5 days VTSR.

Soil/sediment samples must be extracted within 10

days of VTSR. This requirement does not apply to

Performance Evaluation (PE) samples. Extracts of

water and soil/sediment samples must be analyzed

within 40 days following start of extraction.

ACTION: If contractual holding times are exceeded,

document in the Data Assessment and organic

Regional Data Assessment summary form.

NOTE: The data reviewer must note in the Data

Assesswent whether or not technical and

contractual holding times were met.

3.0 su~~ocate Recoverv {Form III

3.1 Are the PSST/PCB Surrogate Recovery Summaries

(Fo~ II) present for each of the following

matrices:

b. Soil?

d

. I

r

V

1

2.. Low water?

3.2 Are all the PEST/PCB samples listed on the

appropriate Surrogate Recover! Summary for each

of the following m~trices:

TIERRA-A-017908
STANDARD OPERATING PROC£DaRE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: June 199E

SOP HW-o, Rev. 11

YES NO N/;.

a. Low water? ~-

b. Soil? d_

ACTION: Contact the WAM to obtain an explanation or

resubmittal of any missing deliverables from

the laboratory. If missing deliverables are

unavailable, document the effect in the Data

Assessment.

3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk?

ACTION: Circle all outliers with red oencil.

3.4 Were surrogate recoveries of TCX or DCB outside

of the contract specification for any sample,

method blank or sulfur clean-up blank (30-150%)?

ACTION: In the absence of matrix interference,

qualification of the data is not required in the

following three situations:

1. When surrogates on both columns are diluted out.

2. When one surroaate on one column was outside

(either above or below) the contract limits but

above 10%.

3. When the same surroaate on both columns is

above the contract 1imi L. ----------- --

If the same surroaate on both columns is below

the contract limit but above 10%, check

chromatograms for interference. The reviewer may

use professional jUdgement, and qualify only

those analytes which elute in the region of the

GC chromatogram where interference was observed.

If the same surroaate on both columns is below

the contract limit but above 10% (with no

interference), qualify non-detects and positive

hits "';" (estimated).

If recoveries for both surroaates on both columns

are below the cont=act limit but above 10%, flag

positive results and non-detects for that sample

IIJII •

TIERRA-A-017909
STANDARD O~ERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

US EPA Region II SOP BW-6, Rev. 11

Methoa: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/1I.

If recoveries are a~ye the contract limit for

both surroaates on b¢th columns, then qualify

positive values "J".

If both surrogates 6~ one column are below the

contract limit but ~~ve 10%, then use the data·

from the other column, providing both surrogates

on that column are ~~~hin contract limits. The

validator must check trom which column the

concentration is rep~~ted for" each analyte. If

the value is reppr~4 from the failed column,

then cross it out an~ use the value from the

other column. Docume~t this change in the Data

Assessment.

If recovery is below !P% for either 5urrocate on

anv column, qualify p~§itive results "J" and flag

non-detects "RIl

•

3.5 Were surrogate retention times (RT) within the

windows established durt~g the initial 3-point

analysis of Individual s~ancard Mixture A (see

Form VI Pest-l)?

ACTION: If the RT limits are n§t met, positive results

and non-detects for that sample may be

qualified unusable, "R", based on professional

judgement.

3.6 Are-t!lere~any transcription/calculation errors

between raw data and Fo~ II?

-------- ---L~ _ .L:1

ACTION: If large errors exist, contact the WAM to

obtain an exolanation or resubmittal of

corrected deiiverables from the laboratory.

Make any necessary co~rections and document the

effect in the Data As§8ssment.

4.0 Matrix spikes (Form III)

4.1 Is the Matrix Spike/Ma~rix Spike Duplicate

Recovery Fo~ (Ferm tIt) present?

Were matrix snikes analyzed at the reauired

frequency for-each of ~he following matrices

(one MS/MSD must be pQ~tor.med for every 20

samples of similar matrix or concentration

level) :

4.2

a. Low Water?

/

U!.

TIERRA-A-017910
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 11 US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/A

b. Soil?

ACTION: If any matrix spike data are missing, take the

action specified in 3.2 above.

ACTION: Circle all outliers with red pencil.

4.3 How many PEST/PCB spike recoveries are outside QC

limits?

I3Se2~,' cJ out of 12

Soil

lout of 12

~ V

spike and matrix spike

outside QC limits?

Water

4.4 How many RPDs for matrix

duplicate recoveries are

Water

l35"C2.~ C out of 6 ,3 out of 6

'0 •

ACTION: No action is taken on MSjMSD data ~lone.

However, using informed professional judgement,

the data reviewer may use the matrix spike and

matrix spike duplicate results in conjunction

with other QC criteria and determine the need

for some qualification of the data.

----_ .... _--

5.1 Is the Method Blank Summary (Form IV) present? l-l

5.2 Freauencv of Analvsis: Has a reagent/method blank

been analyzed for each SDG, every 20 samples of

similar matrix and concentration level or each

extraction batch, whichever is more frequent? 1-1

ACTION: If any blank data are missing, take action as

specified above in section 3.2. If blank data

is not available, reject URII all associated

positive data. However, using professional

judgement, the data reviewer may substitute

field blank data for missing method blank data.

5.3 A separate Form IV should be present if part of

an extraction batch required sulfur removal. In

such cases some samples will be listed on two

blank summary forms - once under the method

_ ~ _ ,."S»

TIERRA-A-017911
STANDARD OPERAT~NG PROCEDURE

US EPA ~egion ~I

Method: CLP/SOW O~~03.2

Date: June 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 11

YES NO N/A

blank, and once under the sulfur clean-up blank

(PCBLK). Was this additional blank raw data and

Form IV submitted when required?

ACTION: If sulfur clean-up blank data and

Form IV are missing, take action

as specified in 3.2 above.

5.4 Has a PEST/PCB instrument blank been analyzed at

the beginning of every 12 hr. period following

the initial calibration sequence (minimum

contrac~ requirement)?

ACTION: If any blank data are missing, take action as

specified in section 3.2 above.

5.5 Was the correct identification scheme used for

all Pest/PCB blanks? (See page B-33, sec.

3.3.7.3 of the SOW for further information.)

ACTION: Contact the WAM to obtain resubmittals or make

the required corrections on the forms.

Document in the Data Assessment under Contract

Problems/Non-Compliance all corrections made by

the validator.

5.6 Chromatoaraohv: review the blank raw data -

chromatograms, quant. reports and data system

printouts. Is the chromatographic performance

{oaseI ine stabi11ty)'for-each-in~-rument

acceptable?

ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the

effect on the data.

6.0 contamination

NOTE: "Water blanks", "distilled water blanks" and

"drilling water blanks" are validated like any

other sample and are not used to qualify the

data. Do not confuse them with the other QC

blanks discussed below.

6.1 Do any method/reagent, instrument, or cleanup

blanks show positive hits for pest/PCBs?

6.2 If any method blanks and/or sulfur clean-up

blanks contain "hits" for target compounds, are

these hits greater than the CRQL for that

I

Ll ~-

,

. /

r\.r

Ji_

-;//---- -

.L:.l -

TIERRA-A-017912
STANDARD OPERATXNG PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

SOP BW-6, Rev. 11 US EPA Region IX

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO ~/A

analyte?

In any instrument blanks, is the concentration of

any target hit> 0.5 times CRQL for that analyte

(see SOW, section 12.1.4.4.2, page D-77/PEST)?

NOTE: Most labs will report 0.5 times CRQLs on the

instrument blank Form I instead of the actual method

CRQLs. If the lab reported the actual CRQLs, then

check if any detected hits are above 0.5 times the

CRQLs reported on the Form I.

6.3

ACTION: If yes to any of the above questions: note in the

Data Assessment under Contract Problems/NonCompliance if any method or clean-up blanks

contain hits> the CRQL, or of instrument blank

contained hits> 0.5 times CRQL for that analyte.

6.4 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive pest/PCB

results?

ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated with

each contaminated blank. (Attach a separate

sheet)

NOTE: All field blank results associated to a particular

group of samples (may exceed one per case or one per

day) may be used to qualify data. Do not convert

field blank results to account for the difference in

-------so-il CRQLs~--- Elanks ma¥----.ru:l~qualifie~~ca~§e_of _

contamination in another blank. Field blanks must be

qualified for surrogate, and/or calibration QC

problems.

ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to

qualify TCL results due to contamination. Use

the largest value from all the associated blanks.

NOTE: When applied as directed in the table below, the

contaminant concentration in method/instrument/

reagent/cleanup blanks is multiplied by the sample

dilution factor, where necessary.

If the laboratory has not already done so, the

contaminant concentration in §Qil blanks is

multiplied by 33 times the sample dilution factor and

corrected for %moisture· (fraction of solid) where

necessary. 30 grams of sodium sulfate are used to

prepare each soil reagent/method blank as instructed

on page D-72/PEST, section 12.1.2.3.1. Ask the WAM

TIERRA-A-017913
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

OS EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: June 1.996

SOP BW-6, Rev. 11

YES NO N/A

to contact the laboratory if the soil blanks are not

reported in soil units (~g/kg).

Flag sample result

with a "U":

Report CRQL &I

quality "U":

No qualification

is needed:

Sample conc. > CRQL,

but :$ 5x blank.

Sample conc. < CRQL &

is :$ 5x blank value.

Sample conc. > CRQL

& > 5x blank value.

i NOTE: If gross blank contamination exists, all data in

the associated samples should be qualified as URn ,"

unusable.

Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated

with every sample? l-l

ACTION: For low level samples, note in the Data

Assessment that there is no associated

field/rinse/equipment blank. For analytes with

high concentrations, use professional judgement

to qualify these values and document in the

Data Assessment.

6.5

Exceotion: samples taken from a drinking water

tap do not have associated field blanks.

7. ·0- ca.iibratlon -an-d- GC Performance--- - ----~-

7.1 Are the following Gas Chromatograms and Data

Systems Printouts for both columns present for

all samples, blanks and MSjMSD:

a. Peak resolution check?

b. Performance evaluation mixtures?

c. Aroclor 1016/1260?

d. Aroclors 1221, 1232, 1242, 1248, 12547

e. Toxaphene?

f. Low points individual mixtures A & B?

g. Med points individual mixtures A &I 57

h. High points individual mixtures A &I E?

-~- r'~

TIERRA-A-017914
STANDARD OPERAT:ING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region :II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: June 1996

SOP BW-6, Rev. ~l

i. Instrument blanks?

...

j. Were the appropriate GC columns used as ,

specified on pg. D-11/PEST, sections 6.23.3~1

to 6.23.3.7, in the SOW?

Do the chromatograms for all Individual standard

Mixtures and PEM analyses display single

component analytes at > 10% but < 100% of full

scale (see sections 9.3.5.8.1 thru 9.3.5.8.4,

pages D-32 & 33/PEST)?

7.2

YES NO NjA

Have chromatograms for Individual Standard

Mixtures and PEM analyses been replotted, showing ~?

scaling factor(s), to meet the above requirements

when necessary? ' ---

NOTE: All standard chromatograms must clearly display

all peaks at > 10% but < 100% of full scale, and

replotted if necessary 'to accommodate peaks not

properly scaled in the initial chromatogram(s) .

Both the initial and replotted chromatograms must

be submitted with the data package.

ACTION: If all single component peaks are not clearly

displayed on chromatograms for all Individual

Standard Mixtures and PEM analyses, notify the

W~J1 to obtain resubmittal of the necessary

data.

--~----------------- -----~-- ------------

7.3 Are Forms VI PEST 1-7 present and complete for

each column and each analytical sequence?

ACTION: If no, take action as specified in 3.2 above.

7,4 Are there any transcription/ calculation errors

between raw data and Forms VI?

ACTION: If large errors exist, take action as specified

in section 3.6 above.

7.5 Do all standard retention times, including each

pesticide in each level of Individual Mixtures A

& B, fall within the windows established during

the Initial Calibration (see Form VI PEST-1)?

ACTION: If no, all samples in the entire analytical

sequence are potentially affected. Check to

see if the chromatograms contain peaks within

an expanded window surrounding the expected

- ~ - p.frt1

.... - .

rV~

r~_

Ll /

TIERRA-A-017915
STANDARD 6'.PERATING PROCEDURE Date: June 1996

US EPA Region II SOP HW-6, Rev. II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/A

7.6

retention times. I~ no peaks are found and the

surrogates are visi~)e, non-detects are valid.

If peaks are presen~ ,and cannot be identified

through pattern rec~nition or using a revised

RT window, qualifY &}.l positive results IIJNII

and non-detects as a~usable (R). For aroclors,

the RT may be outsi~ the window, but the

aroclor may still bEt identified from its

distinctive pattern,

Are the linearity" crt,&~ria for the initial

analyses of Individuai standards A & B within

limits for both columri§? (%RSD must be ~ 25.0

for alpha and delta SHG, ~ 30.0 for the tNO

surrogates and ~ 20% f&~ all other analytes.)

/

'''/

NOTE: Contra~tual requirement~ allow up to two single

component TCL compounds! but,not surrogates, on

each column to exceed t~ cr~teria provided the

~RSD is ;$ 30%. (See pa<je ~-28(pest, sec. 9.2.5.7

1n the SOW~) Technical ~r~ter1a, however, are

the same for all analyte§'

ACTION: If technical criteria ~ere not met, qualify all

associated positive re?-ults generated during the

entire analytical sequ~nce IIJIfand all

non-detects IIUJ". Whe:1 %RSD > 90%, flag all nondetect resul tsfor thaC analyte IfRIf(unusable). "

ACTION: Ifm'ore-than- tw-o -anal y-=-es-fiiled--%R5D-, -document--

in the Data Assessment Contract Problems/NonCompliance sectien ana organic Regional Data

Assessment Summaiy for>',·

Is the resolution betNee- each pair of adjacent /

peaks in the Resolution (::-leckMixture ~ 60.0% for

both columns? (See Fot"Jl-or PEST-4.) _r_

7.7

ACTION: If no, qualify positiv~ results for co~pounds

that were not adequate':..yresolved "JlI. Use

professional jUdgement to determine if nondetects which elute in areas affected by coeluting peaks should 1:::"; qualified "N" as

presumptive evidence 6t presence or unusable

(R) •

7.8 Is Form VI PEST-5 present and complete for each

Performance Evaluation Mixture (PEM) standard )-

used for both initiai and continuina calibrations

(see SOW section 3.12zA.4, page a-52)? ---'

TIERRA-A-017916
STANDARD OPERATXNG PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: eLP/SOW OLH03.2

Date: June 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 11

YES NO N/A

ACTION: If no, take action as specified in section 3.2

above.

7.9 For each PEM standard, was the resolution between

each pair of adjacent peaks ~ 90.0% on both ~

columns? ri/f

ACTION: Qualify positive results for compounds not

adequately resolved estimated (3). Qualify

non-detects based on professional judgement.

7.10 Have Forms VI PEST-6 & PEST-7 been completed for

all midpoint Individual Standards A and Bused

for initial calibration?

For each standard, was the resolution between ...

each pair of adjacent peaks ~ 90.0% on both

columns?

ACTION: If no, qualify positive results for compounds

that were not adequately resolved estimated

(3). Use professional jUdgement to determine

if non-detects which elute in areas affected by

co-eluting peaks should be qualified "N" as

presumptive evidence of presence or unusable

"R".

Was the %Breakdown of DOT and Endrin calculated

using the equations given on page D-26/PEST, sec. ~

9.2.4.8 in the SOW? d"--

Were all pesticides and surrogates in each PEM

standard within the RT windows established during

the Initial Calibration? l-l

ACTION: If no, take action as specified in 3.2 above.

7.12 Has the individual percent breakdown for

DDT/Endrin exceeded 20.0% in any PEM on either

column? (See Form VII PEST-1.)

for 4,4'-DDT?

- for Endrin?

Has the combined percent breakdown for DOT/Endrin

-7 -r-"

~U./-

rvl,

-- --

TIERRA-A-017917
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Date: June 1996

US EPA Region II SOP HW-o, Rev. 11

Method: CLP/SOW O~~03.2

YES NO N/A

exceeded 30.0% in any PEM on either column

(required for all PEM analyses)?

ACTION: 1. If any percent breakdown has failed the QC

criteria in either PEM in steps 2 and 17 in the

initial calibration sequence (page 0-28/Pest,

sec. 9.2.5.6 in the SOW), qualify all samoles in

the entire analytical sequence as described in

sections 2.a, band c below.

-LLl

2. If any percent breakdown failed the QC

criteria in a PEM calibration verification

analysis, review data beginning with the samples

which followed the last in-control standard until

the next acceptable PEM and qualify the data as

described below.

a. 4.4'-DOT Breakdow~: If DOT breakdown was

> 20.0%:

i. Qualify all positive results for DOT with

IIJII. If DDT was not detected, but DDD and

ODE are positive, then qualify the

quantitation limit for DDT unusable, "R".

ii. Qualify positive results for DDD and/or DDE

as presumptively present at an approximated

quantity IIJN".

b~ -~narin Breakdown: Inf ~nd~inbreakdcwn--was __.H - n

> 20.0%:

i. Qualify all positive results for endrin

with IIJ". If endrin was not detected, but

endrin aldehyde and endrin ketone are

positive, then qualify the quantitation

limit for Endrin as unusable "R".

ii. Qualify positive results for endrin ketone

and endrin aldehyde as presumptively

present at an approximated quantity ''IN".

c. Combined Breakdown: If the combined 4,4'-DDT

and endrin breakdown is greater than 30.0%:

i. Qualify all positive results for DOT and

Endrin with IIJ". If endrin was not

detected, but endrin aldehyde and endrin

ketone are positive, then qualify the

quantitation limit for endrin as unusable

TIERRA-A-017918
STAND~ OPLAATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

SOP RW-6, Rev. 11

US EPA Region II

Method: eLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/A

"R". II-IJO!--wasnot detected, but ODD and

DOE are positive, then qualify the

quantitation. limit for DOT as unusable "R".

ii. Qualify posi~ive results for endrin ketone

and endrin aldehyde as presumptively

present at an approximated quantity ''IN''.

Qualify posi~ive results for 000 and/or DOE

as presumptively present at an approximated

quanti ty ".1U,I.

7.13 Are all oercent di!!erence (%0) values for PEM

analytes·and surroqates on both columns ~ -25%

and ~ +25.0%? (See Form VII PEST-I.)

ACTION: If no, qualify all associated positive results

generated during the analytical sequence tlJII and

sample guantitaticm limits "UJtI

•

Ll

NOTE: If the failing PEM is part of the initial

calibration, all samples are potentially affected.

If the offendinq standard is a calibration

verification, th~ associated samples are those which

followed the last in-control standard until the next

passing standard.

7.14 Is Form VII Pest-2 present and complete for each

INDA and INDB calibration verification analyzed?

ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.

7.15 Are there any transcription/calculation errors

between raw dat~ and Form VII Pest-2?

-/

_r_~_, _

ACTION: If large errors exists, take action as

specified in section 3.6 above.

7.16 Do all standard ~et.ntion times for each INDA and

I.NDB calibration verification fall within the RT /'

windows established during the initial

calibration sequence? (See Form VII PEST-2.) ~ _

ACTION: If no, beginning with the samples which

followed the last in-control standard, check to

see if the chromatograms contain peaks within

an expanded window surrounding the expected

retention times. If no peaks are found and the

surrogates are visible, non-detects are valid.

If peaks are present and cannot be identified

through pattern recognition or using a rev~sed

-/r·q:J

TIERRA-A-017919
STANDARD OPERATZNG PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW O~~03.2

Date: June 1996

SOP BW-6, Rev. 11

RT window, qualify all positive results and

non-detects as unusable (R).

7.17 Are all %0 values for INDA and INDB calibration

verification compounds ~ -25.0% and S +25.0%?

ACTION: If the %D is outside the ±25.0% range for any

compound(s), qualify associated positive

results for that compound "J" and non-detects

"UJ'I. The "associated samples" are those which

followed the last in-control standard up to the

next passing standard containing the analyte(s)

in question. If the %D is > 90%, flag all nondetects for that analyte "R" (unusable).

8.0 Analvtic31 Seauence Check (Form VIII-PEST)

YES NO N/A

Ll J

Is Form VIII present and complete for each column /

and each period of analyses? ~

ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.

8.1

8.2 Was. the proper analytical sequence followed for

each initial calibration and subsequent analyses,

and all standards analyzed at the required

frequency for each GC/EC instrument used.? (See

sow pages 0-23 & 0-58/PEST.)

ACTION: If no, use professional jUdgement to determine

..the- -severi't¥--o.f---the_effect ~ tile.. -.9~~~..?-.!1d

qualify accordingly. Generally, the effect-isnegligible unless the sequence was grossly

altered and/or the calibration was out of QC

limits.

Were all samples analyzed within a 12 hour time

period beginning with the injection of an

instrument blank and bracketed by acceptable

analyses of the proper standards?

ACTION: If no, use professional judgement to determine

the severity of the effect on the data and

qualify accordingly. Document in the Data

Assessment under Contract Problems/NonCompliance and organic Regional Data Assessment

Summary.

8.3

8.4 If a multi-component analyte was detected in a

sample, was a matching multi-component standard

ana~yzed within 72 'hours of the injection of the

-/ r·'lf

~/_.

J_-

TIERRA-A-017920
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: June 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 11

- -sample and within a valid 12 hour sequence?

NOTE: This additional standard is for identification

purposes only. positive results for Aroclors and

~ Toxaphene are quantitated from the initial

calibration.

ACTION: If no, document in the Data Assessment under

Contract problems/Non-Compliance and on the

organic Regional Data Assessment Summary form.

9.0 Cleanun Efficiency verification (Form IX)

9.1 Is Form IX PEST-1 present and complete for each

lot of Florisil cartridges used? (Florisil

Cleanup is required for all Pest/PCB extracts.)

Are all samples listed on the Pesticide Florisil

Cartridge Check Form?

ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above. If

data suggests florisil clean-up was not

performed, document in the Data Assessment

under the Contract Non-compliance section.

9.2 Are percent recoveries (%REC) of the pesticide

and surrogate compounds used to check the

efficiency of the florisil clean-up procedure

within QC limits of 80 - 120%?

ACTION: QuaI~fy only the analyte(s) which failed the

recovery criteria as follows:

YES NO NjA

If %REC is < 80%, qualify positive results lIJ"

and non-detects "UJ".

If any pesticide %REC was zero, flag

non-detects "R" for that compound.

Use professional jUdgement to qualify positive

results if any recoveries are> 120%.

NOTE: Sample data should be evaluated for potential

interferences if recove~y of 2,4,5-trichlorophenol was > 5% in the Florisil cartridge

Performance Check analysis. Document any

problems found in the Data Assessment under the

Contract Problems/Non-Compliance section.

_/P''1')

TIERRA-A-017921
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1.996

SOP HW-6, Rev. 11 US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW Ok~03.2

YES NO N/A

9.3 If GPC Cleanup was performed (mandatory for all

soil sample extracts), is Form IX Pest-2 present? 1-1

Are all soil samples listed on Form IX Pest-27 1-1

ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above. If

data suggests GPC clean-up was not performed

when required, document in the Data Assessment

under the Contract problems/Non-Compliance

section and Organic Regional Data Assessment

Summary.

Are the %REC values for all pesticides in the GPC

calibration solution between 80 - 110%7 1-1

ACTION: Qualify only those analytes which failed the

recovery criteria as follows:

If %REC are < 80%, qualify positive results IIJII

and non-detects "UJ".

If any pesticide %REC was zero, flag

non-detects "R" for that compound ..

Use professional jUdgement to qualify positive

results if any recoveries are> 110%.

NOTE: An Aroclor mixture containing Aroclors 1016 and

1260 is also analyzed during GPC calibration;

however, Aroclor data is not listed on Form IX

PEST-2. The raw GPC data for Aroclors 1016/1260 ..

must be evaluated for pattern similarity with

previously analyzed Aroclor standards.

9.4 The validator should verify that the correct

identification scheme for the EPA Blank samples

were used. See page B-35, sec. 3.3.7.8 and

3.3.7.9 of the SOW for further information.

Was the correct identification scheme used for

GPC and Florisil blanks? 1-1

10.0 Pesticide/PCB Identification

10.1,' Is Font X complete for every sample in which a

pesticide or PCB was de~ected? 1-1

ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.

TIERRA-A-017922
STANDARD OPERA~ING PROCEDURE

US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLH03.2

Date: June 1996

sop KW-6, Rev. 11

10.2 Are all sample chromatograms properly scaled,

attenuated, etc. as required for proper

identification of single and multi-component

analytes? (Refer to SOW sections 11.3.7.1 thru

11.3.7.8, page D-70/Pest for specific details.)

NOTE: Proper verification of Pest/PCB results depends

on clear, legible presentation of the raw data.

Single component pesticides and all peaks chosen

for quantitation of multi-component analytes must

appear at less than full scale. Toxaphene and

PCB patterns must be clearly visible to enable

comparison with standard chrom~tograms.

ACTION: If retention times or apex of peaks cannot be

verified, or if multi-component peak patterns

cannot be discerned, contact the WAM to obtain

resealed chromatograms from the lab.

10.3 Are there any transcription/calculation errors

between raw data and Forms lOA and lOB?

ACTION: If large errors exist, take action as specified

in section 3.6 above.

10.4 Are RTs of sample compounds within the

established RT windows for analyses on both

columns?

Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required

YES NO Ii/A

(when compound concentrat~on is > 10 ug/mt in the -.7

final extract)? L-l

ACTION: Use professional judgement to qualify positive

results which were not confirmed by GC/MS

analysis. Qualify as unusable (R) all positive

results which were not confirmed on a second GC

column. Also qualify as unusable (R) all

positive results which do not meet RT window

criteria, unless associated standard compounds

are similarly biased. Use professional judgement

to assign an appropriate quantitation limit.

10.5 Is the percent difference (%0) calculated for the J

positive sample results on both columns> 25.0%? ~

ACTION: If the reviewer finds neither column shows

interference for the positive hits, the data

should be flagged as follows:

TIERRA-A-017923
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Date: June 1996

US EPA Region II SOP BW-o, Rev. 11

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/A

% Difference

a - 25%

25 - 70%

70 - 100%

> 100%

100 - 200% (Interference detected)*

> 50% (pesticide value is < CRQL)**

Oualifie!."

None

"J'''

"J'N"

"R"

"J'NII

"U"

* When the reported %0 is 100 - 200%, but

interference is detected on either column, qualify

the data with "3".

** When the re~orted ~esticide value is lower than

the CRQL, and the %0 is > 50%, raise the value to

the CRQL and qualify "U", undetected.

NOTE: For Aroclors, if the %0 is > 50%, but the pattern of

GC peaks on both columns indicates a specific Aroclor

is present, qualify that Aroclor "J".

_,I

NOTE: The lower of the two values is reported on Form I.

If using professional judgement, the reviewer

determines that the higher result was more

acceptable, the reviewer should replace the value and

indicate the reason for the change in the Data

Assessment.

10.6 Check chromatograms for false negatives, j

especially the mUltiple-peak compounds (Toxaphene

and the PCBs). were theL e any false negatives? [ 1

ACTION: Use professional judgement to decide if the

compound should be reported. If the appropriate

PCB standards were not analyzed within 72 hrs. of

the sample(s) in question, qualify the data

unusable "R".

Also note in Data Assessment under Contract

Problems/Non-compliance if the lab failed to

analyze Aroclor standards when required.

11.0 Target Comoound List (TCL) ~na1ytes

11.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I

Pest) present with required header information on

each page, for each of the following:

a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate?

b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates? ,-

TIERRA-A-017924
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

OS EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

Date: June J.996

SOP HW-6, Rev. ~l

YES NO N/A

c. Blanks?

d. Instrument Blanks (per column & analysis)?

11.2 Are the Pest chromatograms and quant. reports

included in the sample data package for each of

the following:

a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate?

b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates?

c. Blanks?

d. Instrument Blanks (per column & analysis)?

ACTION: If any data are missing, take action specified

in 3. 2 above.

11.3 Are the calibration factors shown in the guant.

reports?

11.4 Is chromatographic performance acceptable with

respect to:

a. Baseline stability?

b. Resolution?

C peak shape?

d. Full-scale graph attenuation?

e. other:

?

---------------

11.5 Were any electropositive displacement (negative

peaks) or unusual peaks seen?

ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the

acceptability of the data. Address comments

under system Performance section of the Data

Assessment.

12.0.compound Ouantitation and Reoorted Detection Limits

12.1 Are there any transcription/calculation errors in

Form I results? Check at least two positive

results. Were any errors found?

Ll

dTIERRA-A-017925
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Date: June :l996

US EPA Region II SOP BW-6, Rev. :ll

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/A

NOTE: single-peak pesticide results can be checked for

rough agreement between quantitative results obtained

on the two GC columns. Use professional judgement to

decide whether a large discrepancy indicates the

presence of an interfering compoun~. If an

interfering compound is visible on the chromatogram,

the lower of the two values should be reported and

qualified as presumptively present at an approximated

quantity "IN''. This necessitates a determination of

an estimated concentration on the confirmation

column. The narrative should indicate that the

presence of interferences has interfered with the

evaluation of the second column confirmation.

12.2 Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample

dilutions?

ACTION: If large errors exist, take action as specified

in section 3.6 above.

ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one

dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless a QC

exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQLs

from the diluted sample). Replace concentrations

which exceed the calibration range in the .

origi'nal analysis by crossing out the liE"value

on the original Form I and substituting it with

the result from the diluted sample. Specify

which Form I is to be used, then draw a red "X"

across the entire page of all Form I's that

should not be used, including those in the data

summary package.

ACTION: Quantitation limits affected by large, off-scale

peaks should be qualified as unusable (R). If

the interference is on-scale, the reviewer may

offer an approximated quantitation limit (UJ) for

each affected compound.

NOTE: If a sample required greater than a 10 times

dilution, then a 10 times more concentrated analysis

must also be performed and sUbmitted (see SOW, page

D-60/PEST, section 10.2.3.5).

ACTION: If a more concentrated analysis is unavailable,

document in the contract Problems/Non-Compliance

section of the Data Assessment. Use professional

judgement to qualify non-detects and positive

hits below the CRQL.

TIERRA-A-017926
STAND~ OPERATING PROCEDURE

Date: June 1996

SOP HW-6, Rev. ~~ US EPA Region II

Method: CLP/SOW OLM03.2

YES NO N/A

13.1 Were any field dup~icates submitted?

~3.0 Field Duplicates

.. ACTION: Compare the reported results for field duplicates

and calculate the relative percent difference.

ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate

results must be addressed in the reviewer

narrative. However, if large differences exist,

identification of field duplicates should be

confirmed by contacting the sampler.

TIERRA-A-017927 ,
DPO: [x] ACTION [x] FYI REGION II

ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

CASE/SAS NO.: 25601

LA:BORATORY: .:.:S..!.!W~O=.l;K _

SDG NO.: B~S.:I.E.f:.2.f:.2 _ DATA USER: EPA Region II

SOW: OLM03.2 REVIEW COMPLETION DATE: 10/1/97

NO. OF SAHPLES: L- WATER .u..- SOIL OTHER

REVIEWER: [ ] ESD [x] ESAT [] OTHER, CONTRACTOR -

QC ITEM VOA ·SNA PEST

BOLDING TIMES 0 0 0

..

GC-MS PERFORMANCE 0 0 NA

INITIAL CALIBRATIONS 0 0 c

CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS 0 0 x

FIELD BLANXS(F • N/A) 0 0 0

LA:BORATORY BLANKS 0 0 0 I

SURROGATES 0 0 0

MATRIX SPIKE/DUPLICATES 0 0 0

QC SAMPLES(LCS, PVS) NA I NA NA

INTERNAL STANDARDS Z 0 NA

COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION 0 0 M

COMPOUND QUANTITATION 0 0 0

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 0 0

·OVERALI.ASSESSMENT

.. -

M

-_.

...

. 0 = No problems or minor problems that do not affect data usability.

X = No more than about·5 a/a of the data points are Qualified as either estimated or unusable.

M = More than about 5% of the data points are qualified as either estimated or unusable.

Z = More than about 5% of the data points are qualified as unusable.

DPO ACTION ITEMS: VOA: 1) Sampling contractor should be

questioned about failure to preserve acqueous volatile samples,

while marking them as preserved on COC (see Data Assessment, Sec.

11). 2) It should be determined if the lab analyzed the VOA vial

with the air bubble (see Traffic Report, page 40). Fur~her

rejection of data may be required.

AREAS OF CONCERN BNA: Excessive TICs found in method blanks.

Many TICs in samples flagged IIBII did not correspond to those

found in associated method blanks. PEST: PCB contamination

caused problems during sample analysis. All PCB hits in these

samples should be regarded as suspect, especially if these are

not analytes of concern based on previous site investigations.

TIERRA-A-017928
DATA REJECTION SUMMARY

Type of Review: Organic Date: 10/1/97 Case/SDG No. : 25601/BSE22

Site Name: Ke~an Landfill Lab Name: SWOK

Reviewer's Initials: ..lJz.- Number of Samples: 2.0

Analytes Reiec ed Due to Exceeding Review Criteria For:

No. of Co.pound./No. of Fr.otion. lS••pl•••

Surrogate. Holding Calibra· Con amina· ID Internal Other Irotal IIof Total IIRejected/Total #

Time tion ~lon Standard. Samplos in All Sample.

I

VOA(33 ) 79 20 79 / 660 = 12 ~0

ACID(14) 19 0 I 266 = 0 %

BIN (SO) 19 0 / 950 = 0 %

PEST (21) 6 14 19 20 / 399 = 5 %

PCB(7) 19 0 I 133 = 0

~0

UOTa. ASTaRISK (.) INDICATaS ADDITIONAL axcaaDAMcas • IKVIEW CRITaRIA.

Analvtes Estim ted Due to Exceedincr Review Criteria For;

No. of Co.pound./No. of rr.otion. (".pl •••

Surrogate. Holding Calibra- COlitamlna· ID Internal Other Irotal , of Total , Bstimated/Total •

Time tion tion Standard. •

Sample • in All Sample.

VOA(33 ) 581 20 581 I 660 = BB %

ACID(14) 266 19 266 / 266 = 100 %

BIN (50) ·950 19 950 / 950 = 100 %

PEST (21) 26 353 19 379 I 399 = 95 %

PCB(7) 133 19 133 / 133 = 100 %

UOT •• ASTIRrSK (.) INDICATas ADDITIONAL aXCaaDAKCaS • 'KVIEW CRITaIIA. I

I

*

Elevated cooler temperature. I

TIERRA-A-017929
DPO: [ ]ACTION [ ]FYI REGION II

ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

SOW: OLM03.2

LABORATORY: ]::!.S~W~O~K,-- _

DATA USER: EPA Region II

REVIEW COMPLETION DATE: 10/1/97

CASE/SAS NO.: 25601

SDG NO.: J:::!.B~S~E~4.:::6 _

NO ..OF SAMPLES:

REVIEWER: [ 1 ESD

WATER L- SOIL OTHER

[xl ESAT [] OTHER, CONTRACTOR -

QC ITEM VOA BNA PEST

BOLDING TIMES 0 0 0

GC-MS PERFORMANCE 0 0 NA

INITIAL CALIBRATIONS 0 0 0

CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS 0 0 x

FIELD BLANXS(F • N/A) 0 0 0

LABORATORY BLANKS 0 0 0

SURROGATES 0 0 I

0

MATRIX SPIKE/DUPLICATES 0 0 0

QC SAMPLES(LCS, PVS) NA NA NA

INTERNAL STANDARDS Z 0 I NA

COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION 0 0 I

x

COMPOUND QUANTITATION 0 0 0

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 0 0 0

OVERALL ASSESSHEN'! Z M M

o • No problems or minor problems tbat do not affect data usabifrty.

X - No more than about 5% of the data points are quafdied as Bither estillated or unusable.

M • More than about 5% of the data points are qualified IS either estlnated or unusable.

Z • More than about 5,.. of the data poinu are qualified IS unusable.

DPO ACTION ITEMS:

AREAS OF CONCERN BNA: Excessive TICs found in method blanks.

Many TICs in samples flagged "B" did not correspond to those

found in associated method blanks. PEST: PCB contamination

caused problems during sample analysis. All PCB hits in these

samples should be regarded as suspect, especially if these a~e

not analytes of concern based on previous site investigaLions.

p.IO..,

TIERRA-A-017930
I

I

I

DATA REJECTION SUMMARY!

Type of Review: Organi.c Date: 10/1/97 CasE ISDG No. : 25601/BSE46

Site Name: Kg.§gan Landfi.ll Lab Name: SWOK

Reviewer'S Initials:4 ,Number of Samples: 3

Analytes Rejected Due to Exceedina Review Criteria For:

110. 01 Co.pound./Uo. or rraation. (11 •• 101•• 1

aurrogate. Holding C.libra- Contamina- ID Internal Other tro al It of Total I Rejected/Total •

Time tion tion atandard. ample. in All Sample.

I

VOA (33) 36 3 36 / 99 = 36 %

ACID(14) 3 0 / 42 = 0 %

BIN (50) 3 0 / 150 = 0 %

PEST (21) 1 2 3 3 / 63 = 5 %

I

PCB(7) 3 0 / 21 = 0 %

1I0TK. IoST.IIIS11 (*1 I1IDlCATU ADDITloaJAL axclllDAUCIlS or IIl1VIIW CRITIRIA.

Analytes Estimated Due to Exceeding Revie Itl Criteria For:

.' No .. 0 co.pound./Uo. or rr.otion • ( ••• 01 •• 1

Surrogate. Holding Calibra- Contalllina- 10 Internal Other fc tal • of Total » E.timated/Total »

Time tion tion Standards • Samplell in All Sample.

VOA (33) 63 3 63 / 99 = 64 %

ACID(14) 42 3 42 / 42 = 100 %

BIN (50) 150 3 150 / 150 = 100 %

PEST (21) 5 55 3 60 / 63 = 95 9

0

PCB(7) 21 3 21 / 21 = 100 %

NOTI. ASTIlRISK (*1 INDICATIS ADOITIONAL llXCllllOANCIlSor RlIVIIW CRITIlRIA.

w Elevated cooler temperature.

TIERRA-A-017931
ATTACHMENT 1

SOP NO. HW-6

Page 1 of 13

_ __ _eLF DATA ASSESSMENT

punctionai Guidelines for Evaluating Organic Analysis

CASE No.: 25601 SDG No.: BSE22,46 LABORATORY: .l:!S..t.lWuQ"-!.K~ -

SITE: Keegan Landfill

DATA ASSESSMENT

The current SOP BW-6 (Revision 11) June 1996, USEPA Region II Data

Validation SOP for Statement of Work OLM03.2 for evaluating organic

data have been applied.

All data are valid and acceptable except those analytes rejected

"RW (unusable). Due to the detection of QC problems some analytes

may have the "J" (estimated), WN" (presumptive evidence for the

presence of the material at an estimated value) flag. All action

is detailed on the attached sheets.

The "RW flag means that the associated value is unusable. In other

words, significant data bias is evident and the reported analyte

concentration is unreliable .

.

J .

Reviewer's ~ ' 7 IJ Signature: ~ .J...-:-1-=~~;;.l'...,,~0~~~ --

/ J-::.~ _"

Verified By: . '. ~!1l--: 7 1

Date: /8 /~.J1992

TIERRA-A-017932
ATTACHMENT 1

SOP NO. HW-6

Page 2 of 13

CLP DATA ASSESSMENT

1. HOLDING TIME:

•

The amount of an analyte in a sample can change with time due to

chemical instability, degradation, volatilization, etc. If the

specified holding time is exceeded, the data may not be valid.

Those analytes detected in the samples whose holding time has been

exceeded will be qualified as estimated, f1J". The non-detects

(sample quantitation limits) will be flagged as estimated, wJ", or

unusable, rtR", if the holding times are grossly exceeded.

The following action was taken in the ~amples and analytes shown

due to excessive holding t~e.

SDG BSE22

PEST:

See CADRE Holding Time Report.

2. SURROGATES:

All samples are spiked with surrogate compounds prior to sample

preparation to evaluate overall laboratory performance and

efficiency of .the analytical technique. If the measured surrogate

-----concentrations were outside contract sped fications, qualifications

were applied to the samples and analytes as sbown below.

BSE22

./ /

VOA, BNA: All hits and non·detects were previously qualified" J" for high

percent moisture. No further qualification of the data was necessary.

PEST: See CADRE SMC/Surrogates Report.

BSE46

VOA, BNA, PEST: All hits and non-detects were previously qualified" J" for

high percent moisture. No further qualification of the data was necessary.

r' TO?

TIERRA-A-017933
)A

Bo1diDg T~ •• port

LABORATORY: SMI.-TllLSA

AGBNCY INPUT FILS: BSE2:l.0AS SDG NO:

CASE NO:

BSB2:l

25&01

VolaCile

-------------------------------------~.-~---------_.-

Pri_ry .Expanded

--- Bxtraction --- •• -- Analysis .---

Primary Bxoanded

Filename: BSB22 Date, 0'!11/'7 Time: 0':50 CAORB, 2.3.1

water U 21

soil U 28

........ Aromatic ---- -- NOn-a=-tic --

Unpre.erved Pri_ry Expanded Primary Sxpanded

----------- .------ ..---_ ... - ---_ ..-- --------

"'''ter ? 2. 14 28

Soil 10 28 10 28

Semivolatile

------------------~----------------------------------

--- Bxt.raction ---

.... ....- Analy.i. --_ ...

primary 1lxpanded Primuy Bx;landed

.... ----- -----_ ..... _ .._---- ... -_ .... _--

w.aeer ? 28 .0 &0

Soil 7 28 40 &0

Pesticide

--_._-----_ .. __ ..--_.~---------------------_.~---_ .. _---

primary

Page 1

Wa'Cer ?

7

40

40

DC-163: Tne following pe.ticide .oil .amples are outside primary •

extraction holding time criter1ao.~V c t-/t:;jtPe CtJ,,~n;.Ltcr/lt:rJC(,

Hlt. are qualified 'J' and non-dececc. are qualified ·OJ·.

8SB27. BSB27DL. B5i28. BSi28CL, 85H2.DLMS. BSB280LHSO

BSB21KS. B5H2.H50. BSB11, BSB310L. BSB17. B5E370L

BSB18. BSB1IDL. BSB41 , B5B410L

p. roB

TIERRA-A-017934
SDG NO:

CASE NO:

LABOttATORY: '''''L-~

AGENCY INPUT FILS: BSK%2.0AS

0:-35: The following volatile .ampl •• have .y~tem =cnitoring compound

recoveries above the upper li.it of the criteria window.

Hits are qualified 'J" and non-detecta are not flagged .

.

BSEHR]; - /V() hlfs.

~se3i~ - .,J...

OC-174: Th. following pe.ticide .a.pla. have .urrogate percent recoveries

which exce.d the upper limit of the criteria window.

If \R for both Burrogatee on both columna are > contract limit,

hite are flagged OJ'.

BSE27, BSE270L. BS828, .S8280L. BS828M •• BS828MSO

BSSll. BSEJ10L, B5BJ2, BSEJJOL •• S834DL. BsEJSDL

BSSJ'OL. BSEJ7 •• SEJ70L, BSE31, BSB43 , BsB430L

BSS44. BSS44DL. BSS4'OL. BSS470L, BS

OC-17S: The following undiluted pesticide .a.pl ••

recoveri •• of le •• than 10\.

Hite ar. qualified 'J' and non-detect.

1/ / J /

BSE%8. BSSl7. BSS4J, BSE44

eurrogate RT becau.e of mi •• ing RT information. Vieual in.pection of the data i. requir.d. Sa.pl •• with aurrogata. falling

outside the R~ ~1ndow ehould be qualified ba.ed on profe •• ional

judge.ent.

pilenallle:BSlC22 Date: Ot/lt/t7 Time: Ot:03 CADRB: 2.3.1

OC-176: The following diluted pesticide eampl •• have .urrogate p.rcent

recoveries of le.e than 10\. Profe••ional judge.ent i.

recollllllended.

Hit. and non-detecta are not flagged.

BSE270L. BSE280L. BSE280LMS, BSE210LMSO, BSS310L, .SEJ20L

BSEJ70L. BSE4JDL. BSE470LMSO

are not full alified for

BSE270L. B5828, BSS280L, BSS280LMS. BS821DLMSO, SSE2t

BSE2'OL, BSSJO. BSBJOOL. BSEJ10L. BSS32. BSE32DL

BSS3 •. BSE330L. BSE34. BSEJ40L. BsE3S. BSB35DL

BSE3'. B5EJ'DL. BSEl7, BSE370L. BSS43. BSi4JOL

BSi44. BSB44DL. BSB470LMSO

Pag.

TIERRA-A-017935
ATTACHMENT 1

SOP NO. HW-6

Page 3 of 1.3

CLP DATA ASSESSMENT

3. ~TRIX SPIKE/SPIKE DUPLICATE, MS/MSD:

The MS/MSD data are generated to deter.mine the long term precision

and accuracy of the analytical method in various matrices. The

MS/MSD may be used in conjunction with other QC criteria for

additional qualification of data.

No qualification necessary.

4. BLANK CONTAMINATION:

Quality assurance (QA) blanks, i.e., method, trip, field, or rinse

blanks are prepared to identify any contamination which may have.

been introduced into the samples during sample preparation or field

activity. Method blanks measure laboratory contamination. Trip

blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during shipment.

Field and rinse blanks measure cross-contamination of samples

during field operations. If the concentration of the analyte is

less than 5 times the blank contaminant level (10 times for common

contaminants), the analytes are qualified as non-detects, "U". The

following analytes in the sample shown were qualified witb "un for

these reasons:

A) Method blank contamination:

SDG BSE22

J I .// ./

BNA: BSE29, 32, 34, 35 • bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.

One TIC each in the following"samples was rejected: BSE23, 27, 30.

Two TICs each in the following samples were rejected: BSE37, 43, 29.

Four TICs were rejected in BSE32.

Five TICs were rejected in BSE38.

p. /10

TIERRA-A-017936
ATTACHMENT 1

SOP NO. HW-6 Page 4 of 13

CLP DATA ASSES.S~~_ _

SDG BSE46 /"' /

BNA: BSE47, 48 - bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.

One TIC was rejected in BSE46.

Two TICs each were rejected in BSE47 and 48.

B) Field or rinse blank contamination:

Note: The field blanks collected with this case are associated with the soil

samples only.

SDG BSE22

.,,/_ v./'/

BSE28, 33, 35, 36, 36RE - Acetone.

SDG BSE46

VOA:

/ BSE48 - Acetone. *

* This sample 'v",1'8S Qualified due to contamination in field blank BSE42,

which was analyzed in SDG BSE22.

C) Trip blank contamination:

SDG BSE22

,/ BSE26 - Methylene chloride ..

D) Storage blank contamination:

SDG BSE22, BSE46

No problems.

TIERRA-A-017937
Jo.TTACHMENT1

SOP NO. HW-6 Page 5 of 13

CLP DATA ASSESSMENT

5. MASS SPECTROMETER TUNING:

Tuning and performance criteria are established to ensure adequate

mass resolution, proper identification of compounds and to some

degree, sufficient instrument sensitivity. These criteria are not

sample specific. Instrument perfo::rmance is determined using

standard materials. Therefore, these criteria should be met in all

circumstances. The tuning standard for volatile organics is (BFB)

Bromofluorobenzene and for semi-volatiles Decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP).

If the mass calibration is in error, all associated data will be

classified as unusable WR".

No qualification necessary.

6. CALIBRATION:

Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to ensure that

the instrument is capable of producing acceptable quantitative

data. An initial calibration demonstrates that the instrument is

capable of giving acceptable perfor.mance at the beginning of an

experimental sequence. The continuing calibration checks document

that the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance.

A) Response Factor GC!MS:

The response factor measures the instrument's response to specific

chemical compounds. The response factor for the Target Compound

List (TCL) must be ~ 0.05 in both initial and continuing

calibrations. A value < 0.05 indicates a serious detection and

quantitation problem (poor sensitivity). Analytes detected in the

sample will be qualified as estimated, "J". All non-detects for

that compound will be rejected ftR".

No problems.

TIERRA-A-017938
ATTACHMENT 1

BOP NO. BW-6

Page 6 of 13

- -- CLP DATA ASSESSMENT -~

7. CALIBRATION:

B) Percent Relative Standard Deviation (%RSD) and Percent Difference (%D):

Percent RSD is calculated from the initial calibration and is used

to indicate the stability of the specific compOUnd response factor

over increasing concentration. Percent D compares the response

factor of the continuing calibration check to the mean response

factor (RRF) from the initial calibration. Percent D is a aeasure

of the instrument's daily performance. Percent RSD must be < 30%

and %D must be < 25%. A value outside of these limits indicates

potential detection and quantitation errors. For these reaSons,

all POsitive reSUlts are flagged as estimated, "J" and non-detects

are flagged "UJ". If %RSD and %D grossly exceed QC criteria, non- detects data may be qualified "R".

For the PEST/PCB fraction, if %RSD exceeds 20% for all analytes

except for the two Surrogates (which must not exceed 30% RSDI,

qualify all aSSOciated POsitive reSults "J" and non-detects "UJ".

and %D: The fOllOWing analytes in the sample shown were qualified for %RSD.

SDG BSE22*

/\IDA: VBlK 1 - Chloromethane, vinyl chloride, acetone and 2-h~~ne were qualified "J" for %D. _

• VBlK4 • Chloromethane and 2-hexanone were qualified" J" for %0.

,."VBlK6 - Chloromethane and vinyl chloride were qualified "J" far %0.

..- VBlK7 - 2-Hexanone and 2-butanane were qualified "J" far %0.

/' .---- - ~.

VBlK8, VHBlK1 . Cnloromethane was qualified "J" for %0. -----:IBNA: SBlK2 - 2-Methylphenal, 2,2'-axYbiSI1-Chlaraprapanel,

hexachiaracYClapentadiene and fluarene were qualified "J" far %0. .J / ~

J

PEST: BSE31, 38 - DOT was qualified "R" far % breakdawn in the

assaciated PEM standard; methaxY5Pfar was qualified "R" far %0.

p.l!3

TIERRA-A-017939
calibratio~ .eport

LABORATORY;

MaNCY :EMPtn'P:ELI>: SDG !:O: aSDJ.O~

CASi NO:

------~-------------

Vola:il.

--------~-------------------_.------------~--------~-- --

Minimum RRF

Maximum 'RSD (initial calibrationl

M~mU1ll '0 lcontinuing calibration)

Ca~ibration time period

P:i_ry Bxpanded

----_ .... --------

o. os 0.05

30 '0

25 '0

12

Se:ivolati1e

.--------------------+------------~---------------------

Minimum RRF

Maximum 'RSD (initial calibration)

Maximum 'D (continuing calibrationl

calibration tilllepe:iod

Primary Bxpanded

----_ ..... ------_ ...

0.05 0.05

30 '0

JS '0

12

Maximum \RSD linitial calibration) - TcL analyee. JO

_ eu-~ate. 30

Maximum RPD (continuing calibration) 25

I~ft!:ENDB percent re.olution '0

_______ co~1nu1n9 calibration •• quence time 12

---~--~----~-------------- -------- -----~---------

DC-2J: The following volatile .ampl •• are a •• ociat.d with a continuing

calib:ation percent di~fer.nce (\01 out.ide p~1II&ry criteria.

Kits are qualified .J. and non-oetect. are qualified ·OJ·.

BSi46Ri

Chloromethane, Carbon Di.ulfide \

\

aSi.7MS

Chloromethane, carbon Oi.ulfide

BSi~7MSD

Chloromethane, Carbon Di.ulfide

VBt.K2

Chloromethane, Carbon Dieulfide

1/;J-.

4" J

Filename: aSI:2J Date: 0'/11/'7 Ti.e: 0':51 CAPRi' 2.3.1 'age 1

TIERRA-A-017940
(p!J

...---------------------------..,

SDG NO:

c::ASE NO:

BS~'Jt

25501

LABORATORY:

AGSNCY INPUT PILS: BS&22.0AS

VHBLKl

Chloromaehana, Carbon Disulfide

DC-100: Tha following semivolaeile sa.plee are a.sooiaeed vith a

.continuing calibration percent difference ('D) out.ide priaary

criteria.

H~e. are qualified .J. and non-detec~. are qualified ·UJ·.

--- - -- ---- --- ---------- --------_._--------------------------- --

B5EH

Hexachlorocyclopen~adiene, 2.4-Dinitrophenol \

BSB47

H.xachlorocyclopen~adiena. 2.4-Dinitrophenol

BSB47MS

2,4-Dinitrophenol, 4-Nitrophenol. 4.5-cinitro-2-.ethylphenol

BSB47MSD

2,4-Dinitrophenol, 4-Nitrophenol. 4.5_Diniero-2-a.thylphenol

BSlloU

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, 2.4-Din~troph.nol

.-

SBLKl

4-Ni~rophenol

SBLIQ

2.4-Dinitrophenol, 4-Nitrophenol, 4,5_Dinitro-2-aethylphenol

DC-1II: The following pe.~iciQe .aaple. are a.socia~ed with an incorrect '

initial calibration .equence. Visual In.pec~ion i. recomaended.

?

B5B27 , BSB27DL. B5828, BSB2IDL. B5821D~S, a5B28DLM5D

BSB2IHS. BSS21HSD, B5EJ1, BSSJlDL, BSE17, BSS37DL

B5E11, BSS3IDL. aSI43, BSI43DL. PBLKSF

I

BSB27, B5E21, B5121"S, BSI21"SD, BSEJ1, aSEJ7

BSEJI, IlSIi4J

DC-l'1: The following peeeicide ea.ple. are a••ocia~ed vith an incorrect

coneinuing calibration .equenc •. C.e prof •• sional judge.ent to

deeera~ne the effect on ehe data.

DC-l'S: Th. RPD betwaen the nominal and ehe calculaeed amount of an

Filena.e: BSC2

Page

p,llS'"

2

TIERRA-A-017941
ATTACHMENT 1

SOP NO. HW-6

Page 7 of 13

t,j" :pc

cuiP DATA ASSESSMENT

§DG BSE46*

VOA,BNA: See CADRE Ca1jb1~ation Report.

PEST: B5E48 • DDT was quaW"i~d "R" for % breakdown in the associated

PEM standard.

* NOTE: All other results iii' al;1 ~:amr"9.s were previously qualified" J" for

elevated cooler temperature. N-:'l' " ,.' qualification of the data is

necessary.

8 • INTERNAL STANDARDS PERle

Internal standards (IS) perfc

sensitivity and response are

The internal standard area

factor of 2 (·50% to +10C

calibration standard. T~.,re

must not vary more than- ±!O j: ""'....._,-_.

calibration standard. If tht

+100%) range of the j:ssoc:i.

results for compounds quanti

est~ted, wJ", and all non-(

_______ ~~~er~~o~s of sensitivtty.

If an internal standar'd S'et

seconds, the reviewer wili us

either partial or total' S'ej

fraction.

SDG BSE22* .

/ .

VOA: BSE36 - Non-deteoU 8!;

t/' ./'

BSE38, 38RE - Non-dete'6U is "R.";

B5E43 - ,Non-detects ass~~Jat

.I

BSE44 - Non-detects ass'~at;

.-. t~ 1~.·;: .

....."" I~ ~.... \3~1 ~.:J

:_run.

':han a

.:l"~ing

, '>':-d:l:o:d

.~~!:.·:.:.i:J.g

, ,·50\ to

:.:)sitive

.:ied as

:'_..:=e is a

€. than 30

;-;-determine

.:.at sample

':" c '? .ied "R."

: : IS2 oi d 153 were qualified

:-: .; lS3 were qualified "R. n

3nd 153 were qualified "R. n

TIERRA-A-017942
ATTACHMENT J.

SOP NO. HW-6 Page 8 of 13

CLP DATA ASSESSMENT

BNA: BSE23MS - Non-detects associated with IS1 and IS2 were qualified

nR."

SDG BSE46*

VOA: See CADRE Internal Standards ,Report.

* Note: All results for all samples in both SDGs were previously qualified "J"

for elevated cooler temperature. Additional "J" qualification for internal

standard criteria was not necessary.

9. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION:

A} Volatile and Semi-Volatile Fractions:

TCL compounds are identified on the GC/MS by using the analyte's

relative retention time (RRT) and by comparison to the ion spectra

obtained from known standards. For the results to be a positive

hit, the sample peak must be within ± 0.06 RRT units of the

standard compound and have an ion spectra which bas a ratio of the

primary and secondary m/e intensities within 20% of that in the

standard compound. For the tentatively identified compounds {TIC}

the ion spectra must match accurately. In the cases where there is

____--~--not an adequate--ion -sp.ectrum- match, the 1ahoratory may ha¥e_

provided false positive identifications.

SDG BSE22

BNA: One TIC each in BSE23, 31, 36DL, 37, 37DL, 41, 43 and 43DL,

labeled as a laboratory artifact, was qualified "R."

Two TICs each, determined to be laboratory artifacts, were qualified "R" in

BSE27, 28, 28DL, 29, 30, 33, 33DL, 34, 35, 36, 38 and 44.

SDG BSE46

BNA: Two TICs each, determined to be laboratory artifacts, were qualified

uR" in BSE46, 47 and 48.

"./f?

TIERRA-A-017943
() (

SDG NO;

LABORA'I'ORY :

AGlONCY INPUT FILS' asa22.OAS

CASO: NO:

Sthylbenzene, Styrene

Tolu.ne,

'-p.ntanon., 2-R.xanon., T.trachloroeth.n ••

Bthylb.nzene, Styrene

BSI;;.t7MSD

chloro ....than. ,

Methylene chlorid.,

l,l-Ciehloroethane,

Vinyl chloride, Chloroethen.

Carbon Diaulfid., l,l-Dichloroethene

loroeth.ne (total). "Chloroform, 1.2-Dichloroethan.

ane, CArbon Tetrachloride, aromodichloroeoethen.

1.2-Dichloropropane, ci.-1,3-Di

l,l,2-Trichloroethane. aenz.n.,

loropropen., Trichloroethene, Dibromochloromethan.

.-l,3-Cichloroprop.ne, Bromoform

DC-.4: Th. following volatile .....pl •• have ineernal .tandard ar.a count.

out.ide expend.d crit.ria. fl

Rits are qualified OJO end non-detect. are qualified t:iI

BSSU

l,l,l-Trichloroethan., Carbon T.trachlorid., Bromodichlorom.than., l,2-DichloropropL~e

cia-l,3-Cichloropropen., Trichloroeth.n., Cib~hloroeethane. l,l.2-Trichloroethan.

Benzene, trane-1.3-Cichloropropene, Bromoform, 4_M.thyl-2-pentanone

2-Rexenon., Tetrachloroethene, l,l.2.2-Tetrachloroethane, Tolu.n.

Chlorobenzene, Bthylbenzene, Styrene, Xylene (total)

BSlB6RIi

4-Hethyl-2-pentanon., 2-Rexanon., T.trachloroeth.n., l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Toluene, chlorobenzene, Bthylbenz.n., Styr.n.

- ------xyl.n-;(t~t_;:l-)------------~--- ----------- -- -~-

BSlinMSO

4-Hethyl-2-p.ntanone, 2-K_xenon., Tetrachloro.th.na, l,l.2.2-T.trachloroethane

Toluen., chlorobenzene, Sthylb.nzene, Styr.n.

Xylene (total)

Filen ....: UI:22 Dat.: 0'/11'" Ti ....: 0':51 CAnRB: 2.3.1 ::

TIERRA-A-017944
ATTACHMENT1

SOP NO. BW-6

Page 9 of 13

CLP DATAASSESSMENT

".'_: B) Pesticide Fraction:

The retention times of reported compounds must fall within the

calculated retention time windows for the two chromatographic

columns and a GC/MSconfirmation is required if the concentration

exceeds 10ng/ml in the final sample extract.

SOG BSE22. BSE46

See CADRE Quantitation Limit Report.

10. CONTRACT PROBLEMS NON-COMPLI.ANCE:

SOG BSE22

BNA:

a. Alkanes in samples BSE29, 32 (see pages 1OS1, 1302) were not reported

separately in the SDG Narrative as required by SOW Section 2.6.1, page B13.

b. S8lK1 - An alkyl halide TIC was improperly reported separately as an alkane

(page 34) .. ·This caused problems during data review, since the same TIC,

_ - - - --- - .~- -- - - when-found-+n-the--samples,was-FeJJo~--Ofm..-.1-~ and flagge..d...~'-1see_

example page 1810), instead of being reported separately as in the case of

the method blank. Since the corresponding blank TIC could not be found on

Form 1F, it was not possible to determine whether the sample

concentrations were < 5 x the blank amount. The TIC concentration for

the blank was manually calculated and entered on Form 1F (page 2214) so

that the sample data could then be properly qualified.

c. The "B" flag was not properly applied to sample Forms 1F, as required by

SOW Sec. 3.4.2.18, page 8-39. The "B" flags for the number of TICs

indicated for the following samples were crossed out, since these TICs did

not match any retention times or spectra in the associated method blanks:

BSE23 - 1 TIC; 26 - 2 TICs; BSf=27 - 1 TIC; BSE30 - 1 TIC; BSE31 - 2 TICs;

BSE34 - 2 TICs; BSE35 - 1 TIC; BSE37 • 1 TIC; BSE38 • 4 TICs;

BSE43 - 4 TICs. \

r·I !"!

TIERRA-A-017945
SOG NO;

CASE NO;

t.ABORATORY :

Page

AGENcY INPl11' FII.oE:

Bndo.ulfan II, Bndosulfan .u~a~~ ArOclor-1260

, Bndrin .1dehyde , Aroclor-12'0

BSi47CLMS

g....-SHC e', Heptachlor, Aldrin, Dieldrin

Bndrin, 4,4'-DCO, 4,4'-DOT, ArOClor-12'0

BSi470LHSO

ga~-BHC (Lindane', Hept chlor, Ald.-in, Dieldrin

Bndrin, 4,4'-000, ndrin aldehyde

Aroclor-1260

BSUIOL

Heptachlor, alphe-Chlordane, Aroclor'l

CC-422: The following pesticide samples have analytes for which the

percent difference between column result. exceed. primary

criterla. Hits> ClQL are flagged "J." Or: if to is > sot and

value is < ClQL, .ample r.sult i•• levated to the ClOL and

qualified "U.·

BSi27

~. 4,4'-OOT. Aroclor-12'0 ~

S'SB27CL

I

J Aroclor-1260 --:r

. BSi28 j /

- - - 4:-4~DDi.' indrtn~ ';4'"":000.4.F-l'.jM' - -;= -:r- --

J'BSi280L

Ih.ldrin. 4,4'·DC':. alpha-Chlordane, g........-Chlordane -:r

BSi28CLHS

- '\ Dieldrin. Aroclor-12'O ~

BSi28CLHSC ...:'

Ar-f2.G(, 4.4' -COT. alpha-Chlordane, ga... -Chlordane - ~

BSB28MS ....:f ..."T

alpha-Chlordane, ArOclor-12'O .

BSi28KSD

Aldrl.n, 4,4'-COE. 4.4'-CCC. Aroclor-l1'O -:sFilenalll.:BSE22 Cate: 0'/11/'7 Time: 0':50 CACRB: 2.3.1

p.I1.0

3

TIERRA·A·017946
OU&D~i~a~ioD Ltait aeport

LABORATORY:

SDG NO:

CASE NO:

AGBMC'Y IMPtn' PILB: BSC2.OAS

_______ ~~?!~':- / v.. £_'I _~ __ _

V alpha-chloraane, gallllDa-Chloraane --:-- i:xl- ----- - --------- -- - ---- - - ---- - -.- - -

asS:!9 ,j Heptaehlor

:r /

epoxide. Aroelor-1260

J

BSSJO

Endrin ketone. Aroclor-1260 - :r

'S /1 ./' /If. I

gamma-SHC (Lindane). Bndoeulfan I. 4.4·-DOT.

V...

IBSSJODL

J

Aroclor-1260

/

>

J~SE32

4,4'-DOT, ArOclor-1260 -"3"

~

BSB32DL ,. j

/ alpha-Chlordane.

BSSJ:l

,/

V

delta-BHC. Sndoaulfan I

BSS3JOL ~

ga_a-BHC ILindanel • Heptaehlor apoxide. alpha-chlordane, g ....... -chlordane -:r

~ Aroclor-126C

BSIl36

\/ .. 4,4' -DOS, 4,4' -ODD, 4,4' -DOT. alpha-Chlordane - T

,sSS3. J MethoxychlQ::'. alpha-Chlordane -.-:r

J

SEJ70L

-

~J

Bndrin. 4,4'-000

IIssn

,/ Sncirin -:r ,.

/

BSB430L

alpha-chlordane ,:,"J

J BSb44

4,4' -DDS _::f

Filena.e: BSC2 Date: 0'/11/'7 Time: 0';50 CADRB: 2.3.1 Page •

TIERRA-A-017947
SOG NO:

CASE NO:

LABORATORY:

AGGNCY INPl1I' FILE:

"- ~- /'

. /BSG ....DL '1Aroclor-1260 ....]"

ass..6

...

Dieldrin. Endosulfan II. Arcclor-12~O -1.

BSE..6DL

~. Hep~achlor epcxide. Dieldrin. Bndc_ulfan II. Indrin aldehYde.) :xalphe-Chlordane 5

...

~Si47

~ .....'-DDT. Endrin aldehyde. Aroclor-~260 --j

/.

-./SU7Dt.

Endrin aldehyde, Aroclor-12'O -:r

BSE47l>I.MSD

Dieldrin. Sndrin ......··DDT

BSG47!1S

Hepeachlor. Dieldrin ......·-cc~. (••'-DCT ~ ~

BSE(7!1SD

Hepeachlor, Dieldrin. Aroclor·12'O -:1

BSEUDL

ArOclor-12'O -T

CC-423: The following pesticide samplee haVe analyee. for which the

----- -_.- ---------- -- - - ---- percene difference beeween column ~e.~t"'xe.ea'-eXpanaea - - -

cr~~eri.. Hita > CRQL are flagged 'NJ," or 'R" vben \D • 100:

or "NJ' when '0 i. between 100 • 100 (interference detected).

Hita < CRQL are elev.ee~ to the CRQL and ~alified 'U."

BSG28 j /"(2 J...... ::J tJ ./ /".frJ

Dieldr1n, alpha-Chlordane. ga~a,cnlordane

BS1280I.MS

.....'-DDT. gamma-Chlordane

BSE28MS 'S,J ~ ~ (-

- r Aldrin. Dieldrin. Endoeulfan 11. 4••·-cOD

Filename: as&22 Date: O,/le,,' Time: 0':50 CADRB: 2.3.1 Page 5

F·/'22.

TIERRA-A-017948
~/I/

OU&DcitatioD Lt-it .eport

soa NO:

CASE NO:

Ll\BORATORY : SWI.-'%'ULSA

AGENCY INPUT FILi: aSJ:22.0AS

4,4'~DDT,gamma-Chlordane _'I'~~

SSS28HSO

Dieldrin, Iindrin, 4,4' -DOT, elpha -chlordane 1:rto!

gallmla-Chloraane 5

VBSE~:eldri~. 4,4' -DOS, 4,4'-ODT, Bodrio aldehyde ~ (

- ror,~ alpha-Chlordan., 9amma-~~lordane ~

_,..! v\.

SSE2'OL ./ .J I -./ '" lA.

4,4'-DOT, Endrin aldehyde, gamma-Chlordane

J

BSli30...;~ ~{~ ...... -:st- {:- r " ~ ./r

H.pta~hlor. Aldrin, Iindoaulfan I, Hethoxy~hlor

Bndrin aldehyde - ~

\.~

/~~

~drin, Hechoxychlo~, indrin

gamma-chlordane :,~\A /

fs-'

BSE30DL

v...

/r../ #r:

aldehyde, alpha-Chlordane ./

BSSJ1DL

4,4'-ODD -L-l

/'SSS32

9alDllla-er.lo~dane- :Jrl

,

/as"36 1\"

~ D1.ldri~, Bndrin

...faldehyde

/SIi36DL

4,4'-ODi, Endr1n aldehyde ~ ~

I SSli37 ./" •

~ Dialdrin, indoaulfan II, gamma-Chlordan. -- ~

Filename: 8SI:22 Date: OJ/18/" Time: 0':50 CADRS: 2.'.1 Page ,

r·12J

TIERRA-A-017949
,.

QUaDtit_tioD L~t •• po~t

SOG NO:

c;.s£ NO:

LABoRATORY:

AGBNCYINPUT FILB: BSE22.0AS

/

/

BSS37DL /' -;.

\,// Di.ldrin. Bndoeulfan II, g__ a-Chlordane

BSB4] .....:rj /r..... /;1 rJ ,...,'j~

Dieldrin, IlndoaulM II. 4.4'-000, 4.4'-DOT /

g__ a-Chlordane ,./"

't.

BSi43DL ,.it. /-:rrl /'fr -~

D1.eldrin': Bndrin:" Gndoeulfan II~ ...1,4' -DDD.,;'''

/';~' -OOT, gamma-Chlordan. ./

.' '"'J"~ .....t;... J BSIl:~ 4' -COT -:j rJ ./

.-

/ ....aSB44DL

V 4,4'-OOT

11 ,A 1~

..".-BSIl460L .' ,/ - ,/ c::.-- ...--,/ \,.1.. ."

~ Ilndosulfan I, Sndrin, Bndoaulfan aulfate. gamma-Chlordane ~

BSS47HSD

4.4'-OOT

,

•

.......BSll48 " Jf'V " jf" _"jrJ ·Z

.../ H"Ptac~~: ".4' -DO; Bndoau{fan ;1, alPha-';;lord";: ~

Filename: 851122 Date: 0'/11/'7 Ti •• : D't5D CADRB:2.3.1 Page 7

p' /2 '1

TIERRA-A-017950
ATTACHMENT 1

SOP NO. HW-6

Page'lO of 13

CLP DATA ASSESSMENT

PEST:

d. Samples BSE27, 28, 31, 37, 38 and 43 were re-extracted past the contract

holding time due to Aroclor-1 254 contamination from another sample.

e. PEMs PEM7J and PEM7K did not meet technical acceptance criteria;

however, a new initial calibration and re-injection of the affected samples

(see analytical sequence (pages 2730 and 2731) were not analyzed as

required by SOW Sec. 9.3.6.4, page D-33/PEST;

SDG BSE46

BNA:

f. An alkanes in sample BSE48 (see page 367) was not reported separately in

the SDG Narrative as required by SOW Sec. 2.6.1, page 8-13. This caused

confusion during data review, since the sample TIC was flagged "B", but the

corresponding TIC in the associated blank was reported in the Narrative and

not on Form 1F.

g. The "B" flag was not properly applied to sample Forms 1F, as required by

SOW Sec. 3.4.2.18, page B-39. One "B" flag was crossed out in sample

-- - - - - - ~- - --SSE4S(seepage-367); smce-thislfCdld-n-ormatetT anyretention-time-or--

spectrum in the associated method blank. ?

h. P:Ms PEM6E and PEM6F did not meet technical acceptance criteria; I

however, a new initial calibration and re-injection of the affected samples

(see analytical sequence (page 731 ) were not analyzed as required by SOW

Sec. 9.3.6.4, page D-33/PEST.

11. FIELD DOCUMENTATION:

SDG BSE22

VOA:

a. BSE22, 23, 26, 39, 41 - Traffic reports, pages 40 and 41, indicate that

r·125

TIERRA-A-017951
"ATTACBMENT ~

SOP NO. HW-6

Page ~~ of 13

eLP DATA ASSESSMENT

these samples were preserved with HCI; .however, the laboratory's pH log,

page 37, indicates they were not.

b. BSE26 - Traffic report, page 40, indicates that the VOA vial had air bubbles.

It could not be determined from the available documentation if more than

one vial was delivered, and if this vial was used for analysis. The problem

was not mentioned in the SDG narrative. No action was taken on the data;

however, further rejection of data may be applicable, depending on whether

the lab analyzed this vial.

12 • OTHER PROBLEMS:

SDG BSE22, 46

VOA, BNA, PEST:

a. The temperature of the five shipping coolers" ranged between 14 and 210

C

upon receipt at the lab (see pages 3342 and 3343 of SDG BSE22). Positive

results and non-detects for all samples in all fractions, including MS/MSD

samples, were qualified "J."

SDG BSE22

VDA:

b. BSE22, 23, 26, 39, 41 - Traffic reports, pages 40 and 41, indicate that

these samples were preserved with Hel. Of these, BSE22, 23 and 26 were

analyzed past the seven-day holding time for aromatics. No action was

required, however, since all samples were already qualified "J" for cooler

temperature.

VOA, BNA:

c. The CADRE Percent Moisture Report did not list samples to be qualified for

these two fractions; however, positive results and non-detects for all

samples were already qualified for the high temperature of the shipping

cooler (see 12.a, above).

p.IZ,"

TIERRA-A-017952
ATTACHMENT 1

SOP NO. BW-6

Page 12 of J.3

eLP ~~T~.~SESSMENT

BNA:

d. There was excessive TIC contamination in the method blanks, including

alkanes. However, many of the TICs flagged "B" in the samples did not

correspond, to any of those reported on Form 1F of the associated method

blanks. (See example pages 1810 and 1811, where four "S" flags were

deleted.)

It was later determined that some of these TICs did not appear on method

blank Forms 1F because they were alkanes, which were reported separately

in the SDG narrative (see pages 34 - 36). The lab failed to recognize that

the corresponding sample TICs were also alkanes and reported them on

Forms 1F (see example, page 1051), instead of separately as in the case of

the method blanks. Still, other sample TICs are neither alkanes, nor are they

found in the associated blank, yet they were flagged liB." This caused a

great deaJ of confusion in reviewing the data, since sample TICs labeled "S"

could not be located on the method blank TIC forms to determine whether

the concentration was < 5 x the blank contamination amount.

Also, the" A" flag was not always applied where necessary to designate

laboratory artifacts (see example, page 1810).

PEST:

e. See CADRE Percent Moisture Report. *

f. Samples BSE27, 28, 31, 37, 38 and 43 were re-extracted past the holding

time due to Aroclor- 1254 contamination from another sample. (See SDG

Narrative, page 6.) All PCB hits in these as well as all other samples in this

SDG, although they are not Ar-1 254 hits, should be regarded as suspect.

g. The following pesticide samples apparently did not require analysis:

BSE27DL, 29DL, 30DL, 32DL, 34DL, 35DL, 36DL and 38DL. The

chromatography of the undiluted samples is satisfactory, provided the proper

scaling factor is used. For example, the chromatograms for SSE32, page

2492, are on scale and Form I, page 2489, shows no hits exceeding the

linear range of the calibration. Only when a lower scaling factor is used,

page 2493, do the peaks appear to be off scale. The PCB pattern is also

clearly visible in the original sample (page 2494).

TIERRA-A-017953
SDG NO,

CASi NO:

SSJ::2/'(C

25'01

LABORATORY: sWL-TtILSA

AGi~CY INPUT FI Lli: SSE:: .OAS

PiRCENT MOISTURE LIMITS

--_._------------------

VO;'

BNI.

PES

pri ..ary 8xpanaed

..... ----- --------

S0'" 90\

50\ '0\

.,\ .,\

OC-12': Percent ..oi.~ure con~ent of the following ~.til. Boil pl.. ~

:::-:::':::::":U;~,·r' " "f'" .J"' - ~~-o"

BSE4'. BS84'RE. BSS4', BSE47MS, BSSt7MSD, BS848 ~C~

0.7,3 ....., 3(( :n, gy, 3S; 3S"f!£, ;fr, 3"4, 3~/3S'r-€ C:::;~.' ~ _ "'

0~-12B: Percen~ moisture cont.nt of the following •.mivol.~il •• oil ~ ~

:::~:::eB::S:::7:.::::.;r:::~' .,..~...Uti., .,. aM ~=-~"~.

BSE4'. a. BSB47MS. BSE47MSO. BSStB/ ~~~ ~

0:-184: Percent ..oi.ture content of the following pe.~icid •• oil ....pl••

exceeds primary erie.ria.

Hite are qualified "J" and non-detect. are qualifi.d "OJ",

aSll27, BSE270L, aSEJO. aSE30DL. BSSJl. aSB110L ) 6Se3~. e$E~41:>L...

aSE:lJ. aSE3JDL, aSEJS, BSi3SDL. a5;3'. aSB36DL

1\SEJ8, BSIlJ8DL. BS;46. aSE46DL, aS847. aSinDL

SSE4 7DLIIS. BSS47DLMSD. aS84711S, BSll47HSD, aSB" •• BSB4BDL

:--~-- DC.18S: Percent ..oi.t~!.~ cont.nt of the following pe.ticide .oil ....pl••

- - - - - -."ci.a.-eXpi:nd.a-eftftu.- - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hite are qualified "J" .n~~on~o-t~B .re qualified "RO,

__---»"14 U'£H?t. '- ;r;.j1~~~p~"~-:;,""..;;::-- .!...:Z~ c,., '"'.....

,;~~ 7~' C.-

--....,.......

..... ..

Fil.n .....: SSJ:2: Oat.: 0'/11/" Ti •• : 0':50 CADRi: 2.3.1 tage 1

TIERRA-A-017954
ATTACHMENT 1

SOP NO. HW-6

'0 .

Page 13 of 13

CLP DATA ASSESSMENT

SDG BSE46

VOA, BNA, PEST:

h. See CADRE Percent Moisture Report. *

* Note: All samples in all fractions were previously qualified for the high

temperature of the shipping cooler upon receipt (see 12.a, abovel.

PEST:

i. ~SE47Dl, 47DlMS, 47DlMSD, 48Dl - Analysis of this diluted sample was

apparently not necessary. There were no hits in BSE47 or BSE48 exceeding

the linear range of the calibration. See Sec. 12.f, above, for more details.

13. This package contains reextractions, reanalyses or dilutions.

Upon reviewing the QA results, the following Form l(s) are

identified to be used. '

SDG BSE22

.VOA:_ BSE3~J_~6_REt3~, 43R~. ~!1_d__~RE __

BNA: BSE28, 30, 36, 37and 43.

PEST: BSE27, 28Dl, 28MS, 28MSD, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36, 37Dl,

38, 43Dl and 44DL.

SDG BSE46

VOA: BSE46RE

PEST: BSE46, 47, 47MS, 47MSD, 48,

p,IZ'f

TIERRA-A-017955
SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA

1700 West AlbaIlJ. Suite A I Broken Arro,,·, OK 74012

918-251-2858

RECEIVED

AUG 2 t \997

',. SPG NARRATIVE

August 13, 1997

CONTRACT NO.: 68-D5-o026

CASE NO.: 25601

SAMPLE NOS.: BSE46, BSE46RE, BSE4 7,BSE47MS, BSE47MSD, BSE48

SOGNO.: BSE46

VOLA Tfi.,E FRACTION

Three soil samples were submitted for Volatile Organic Analysis. The samples were analyzed by GCJMS

following the OLM03.2 CLP Statement of'Work.

Alternate columns used for the analysis of volatile compounds by Method OLM03.2 are ~ Restek XTI-5

(bonded S% phenyl-95% dimethyl polysiloxane), 30m, 0.25mm ID, lum film thickness (Restek: #12253)

and the OB624, 75m, 0.53mmID Megabore, 3um film thickDess (J&W 125-1374).

An alternate trap used for the analysis oh"olatile compounds by method OLM03.2 is the Vocaxb 3000

(Carbopack B/Carboxen 1000 & IDOl; Tekmar #2-l066).

The following samples in this SDG (labeled \\ith an <ORE")are considered billable since reanalysis was

performed to verify internal standard areas: BSE46

No major problems occurred during the analyses of these samples

Blanks: VHBLKI contained low level Methylene Chloride below the CRQL and one Tentatively

Identified Compound (TIC) at an estimated concentration of 46ugIKg.

-_._-----~~------

Surrogates: Sample BSE46 contained int~rnat stanebrd -areas -OUtsldeQC Area Recovciy-Liiiiiis: 1i \\'is .

reanalyzed and duplicated the original results, but also contained one surrogate out. Both analyses are

being submitted.

Matrix Spikes: No problems.

Internal Standards: Sample BSE46 contained internal standard areas outside QC Area Recovery Limits.

It was reanalyzed and duplicated the original results verifying a matrix effect. Both analyses have been

submitted. Sample BSE47 also contained internal standard areas outside QC Area Recovery Limits. It

used its corresponding matrix spike and duplicate (BSE47MS and BSE41MSD) for duplication and

verification of matrix effect

NOTE: All manual integrations in this data package for GCJMS Volatiles have been performed for one of

the following reasons:

a.

b.

Data system missed peak dwing acquisitiorL.:

Data system imptoperl)' integrated peak.

'" !Jt.

,

TIERRA-A-017956
Ifwater samples are contained in this case, their pH data is included on the page accompan)ing this SDG

narrative.

"

Icertify that this data package is incompliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both

technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data

contained inthis hardcopy data package and inthe computeNeadable data submitted on floppy diskette

bas been authorized by the Laboratory Manager, or his designee, as verified by the following signature.

J!tut ~.,bI

HarryM Borg

Organic Program Mamiger

August 13, 1997

r.t 11

TIERRA-A-017957
SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA

1700 West Albany, Suite A I Broken Arrow, OK 74012

918-251-2858

SOG NARRATIVE

August 13, 1997

CONTRACT NO.:

. ~. 'r

CASE NO.: 25601

SAMPLE NOS.: BSE46, BSE47, BSE47MS, BSE47MSD, BSE48

SDGNO.: BSE46

SEMIVOLATILE FRACTION

Three soil samples were submitted for Semivolatile Organic Analyses. The samples were analyzed by

GClMS following the OLM03.2 CLP Organic Statement of Work.

The following column is used for the semivolatile analysis: Restek XTI-S (bonded 5% phenyl-9S%

dimethyl polysiloxane), 30m, 0.25mm !D, O.25wn rllm thickness (Restek #12223).

No major problems occurred during the analyses of these samples. Sample coolers arrived at 20 and 21

degrees Celsius.

The following samples had alkanes reported and the reports are included at the end of this SOG Narrative:

BSE46, BSE47, BSE48, SBLK1, SBLK2

Blanks: SaLK 1 had low level phthalate contamination below CRQt.

Surrogates: No problems.

Matrix Spikes: No problems.

Intemal Standards: No problems.

NOTE: All manual integrations in this data package for GCIMS VolatileslSemivolatiles have been

performed for one of the following reasons:

a. Data system missed peak during acquisition.

b. Data system improperly integrated peak.

Jfwater samples are contained inthis case, their pH data is included on the page accompanying this SDG

narrative.

\.

Icertify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both

technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data

contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette

has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager, or his designee. as verified by the following signature.

~1Jf~bj

Harry M. Borg

Organic Program Manager

hb

August 13, 1997

TIERRA-A-017958
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

SDG Narrative

Case:

SDG:

Contract:

Samples:

Fraction:

25601

BSE46

68-DS-0026

BSE46, BSE47, BSE48.

PesticidelPCB

SDG BSE46 consisted of 3 soil samples plus dilutions which were analyzed for pesticideIPCBs.

All samples, blanks and spikes were extracted .and analyzed according to EPA SOW OLM03.2.

The samples were analyzed on J&W Scientific dual analytical columns (30m x O.32mm ID.

O.2S~ film thickness, DB-I? and DB-1701). The pB-17 phase consists of (50%-Phenyl)

Methylpolysiloxane and the DB-1701 phase consists of (14%-Cyanopropylphenyl)

Methylpolysiloxane. These columns were specifically designed for pesticideIPCB separation as

required by the EPA's SOW. AlI applicable manufacturer-'s instructions were followed for the

analysis of pesticideslPCBs. Manufacturer provided infonnation concerning the performance

characteristics of the column are kept on site. Hydrogen was used as the carrier gas for

instrument HP-15. Helium was used as the carrier gas for all other instruments.

Surrogate recoveries of all method blanks were within limits. Two compounds of twelve spiked

were outside of control limits in the MSIMSD of sample BSE47.

Itshould be noted that when multi-responding compounds are present in a sample, false positives

of single response compounds are common. The number of false positives may be reduced by

employing a ratio technique in samples which are "clean", containing minimally more peaks

than the mUlti-responder of interest, and do not contain environmentally altered multiresponders. However, "real-life" samples are typically not as previously described. Many times

they exhibit highly complex chromatograms and environmentally altered multi-responders which

are unable to be ratioed with a great deal of accuracy. Since ECD detection is not a defmitive

_me~ns 9{ det~c~ion,_stngJe_-r~sp~n~e_~a!yte~ ~~!h~pr~s~nce_of. multi-responders will be

reported (as per the method, if a peak is within a target analyte's- retentlciil-tillie window on ooth - -

columns, then it is reported as that target analyte). This alleviates the possibility that false

negative results will be reported. However, this may lead to false positives. The end data user

should be aware of the limitations of the method and take appropriate care.

All samples in this SDG caused extremely high breakdown of 4,4' -DDT, methoxychlor, and

several other pesticides inthe continuing standards following their injection. The continuing

standards analyzed before these samples met OLM03.2 continuing calibration criteria. When

diluted lOX (in order to achieve satisfactory chromatography as per D-S9IPEST, 10.2.3.1), the

samples met OLM03.2 acceptance criteria. A non-compliant undiluted analysis and a lOX

compliant analysis was performed for these samples. Fonns for the undiluted and the 10X data

have been submitted. .

.,-.

All samples in this SDG, as noted above, required dilution. 'This was performed per D-S9IPEST.

10.2.3.1, which states that all samples must be analyzed at the most concentrated level that is

consistent with achieving satisfactory chromatography. These samples were diluted in order to

allow for the continuing calibration to be compliant. Therefore. the dilutions are billable .

1700 W. Albany Broken Arrow, OK. 74012-1421

r·il)

(918)251-2858

TIERRA-A-017959
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

The following tables list the total nanograms injected on column for each calibration standard

based upon amount injected on column. O.SJ.1L, 1J,tL.or 2J,tL:

RESOLUTION CHECK

Compoullds ..': -

-:.;'-"k~..;'-- Total nanograms,", :ro~ nanograms .,~,,- Totalnanograms ':.

.,0 ~: :)~~"~-]'~:

. . ,-':,-~\~:_~,:/ '(O~s¢;Y~~;-'-::'::!" 5?( (riJLf?,~,?c':;-, ~;c" (2JiLyQ'-",,<-::, ~-::-':'.-

gamma-Chlordane 0.005 0.01 0.02

Endosulfan I 0.005 0.01 0.02

4,4'-DDE 0.01 0.02 0.04

Dieldrin 0.01 0.02 0.04

Endosulfan Sulfate 0.01 0.02 0.04

Endrin Ketone 0.01 0.02 0.04

Methoxychlor 0.5 0.1 0.2

Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.01 0.02 0.04

Decachlorobiphenyl 0.01 0.02 0.04

PERFOF~~ANCE EVA IJJA nON -- - --- -

I

,g~j}j~~~~~t;_1;-~:.,:'.-~,::r~:'~f1tg}t~! :Totallianogi"aIns :,-;~

;Ffio~l~~t~~:~~~t

'Total nanograms :,;-':

_.lZ'=~-..':. ..,,--- __ -. -.0':-. . - -.-, ~,~~_ .., "{iiLLr;"'~',:rl~:-'o'~:':-'ff.: .(O.5~)?;='~-;"-'?~_:1;f:

ga..rnma-BHC 0.005 I 0.01 0.02

I alpha-BHC 0.005 I 0.01 I 0.02

I 4,4'-DDT 0.05 0.1 .02

I beta-BHC 0.005 I 0.01 !I 0.02

Endrin 0.025 'I 0.05 I

O.1

Methoxychlor O.125 0.25 0.5

I Tetrachloro-m-xylene [f01 I

0.02, I

0.04

I Decachlorobiphenyl (0.01 I

0.02 I

0.04

INDIVIDUAl. STANDARD MIXTIJRE A -- LOW -- -- -- - ~ - - --

Compounds Total nanograms T~tal nanograms. Total nanograms

(0.5J,tL) - - (l~) (2J,tL)

alpha4 BHC 0.0025 0.005 0.01

Heptachlor 1 0.0025 10.005 10.01

gamma-BHC 0.0025 0.005 0.01

Endosulfan I 0.0025 0.005 0.01

Dieldrin 0.005 0.01 i 0.02

Endrin 0.005 0.01 0.02

4,4'-000 '10.005 [0.01 10.02

4,4'-DDT 0.005 0.01 ' 0.02

Methoxychlor 0.025 0.05 0.1

ITetr~chloro-m-xylene J 0.0025 10.005 I 0.01

I Decachlorobiphenyl J 0.005 10.01 10.02

1700 W. Albany Broken Arrow, OK. 74012·1421

r·nl.l

(918)2S1-28S8

TIERRA-A-017960
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

.' -'.

INDIVIDUAL STANDARD MIXnrRE B •• LOW ICl)~P?und~:"~~:,}~:"',,;L"'Y:,' r;~~(:~,~~~,:~ :d~~)~~?~~,';~:~bO~)~a.n,~~~..-

,

," .' ". " .........., . . ",,"" , .,' .

I beta·BHC . I 0.0025 I 0.005 I 0.01 Idelta-BHC 0.0025 0.005 0.01 . ,

I Aldrin I 0.0025 0.005 0.0 I

IHeptachlor epoxide 0.0025 0.005 0.01

Ialpha-Chlordane 0.0025 0.005 0.01

gamma-Chlordane 0.0025 0.005 0.01

4.4'.DDE 10.005 I 0.01 0.02

Endosulfan sulfate 10.005 10.01 0.02

Endrin aldehyde I 0.005 0.01 0.02

Endrin ketone ,·1 0.005 10.01 I

0.02

Endosulfan II 10.005 10.01 I

0.02

Tetrachloro-m-xylene I 0.0025 10.005 I

0.01

Decachlorobiphenyl 10.005 10.01 , 0.02

INDIVIDUAL STANDARD MIXTURE A _. MEDIUM

Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.01 0.02 0.04

;"--~

f"~~~{~~r;.ID~·~(~·~~.~~§~} ~'~~~~~~~~'~~ "~6°;l)~~g~;~-~:~~ ·"":boXf)~~~~~~<'~'·"

alpha-BHC 0.0 I 0.02 0.04

Heptachlor 0.01 0.02 0.04

gamma-BHC 0.01 0.02 0.04

Endosulfan I 0.0I 0.02 0.04

Dieldrin 0.02 0.04 0.08

Endrin 0.02 0.04 0.08

4,4'-DDD 0.02 0.04 0.08

4,4' ..DOT _ - - - - "0.02 "_. - 0.0-4. - - - - O.O&.. - _. - - "

Methoxychlor 0.1 0.2 0.4

Decachlorobiphenyl 0.02 0.04 0.08

INDIVIDUAL STANDARD MIXTIJRE B - MEDIUM

0.02

Total nanograms

(2JJL) " . - ':.

alpha-Chlordane 0.01 0.02 0.04

Compounds . ,. .. "". Total nanograms

(0.5).lL) .. ..

I delta-BHC

0.01

T~tal nanograms

(lJJLJ'

beta-BHC 0.02 0.04

I Aldrin

10.01 0.02 0.04

I Heptachlor epoxide

10.01 0.04

10.01 0.02 0.04

14,4'-DDE

gamma-Chlordane 0.01 0.02 110.04

10.02 10.04 ,10.08

1700 W. Albany Broken Arrow, OK. 74012-1421

p.13>

(918)251-2858

TIERRA-A-017961
. Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

I Endosu!fan sulfate 10.02 10.04 :J0.08

10.02 10.04 10.08 Endrin aldehyde

I Endrin keton~ 10.02 10.04 10.08

Endosulfan II to.02 1°.04 .10.

08

Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.01 0.02 0.04

IDecachlorobiphenyl [Q()2 J 0.04 I O.OS

INDIVIDUAL STANDARD MIXTURE A -- HIGH

Co.mpounds 1

alpha-BHC

Heptachlor

ga.rnma-BHC

Endosulfan I

Dieldrin

Endrin

4,4'-DDD

4,4'-DDT

Methoxychlor

Total nanograms 1 Total nanograms I Total nanograms

(O.SIlL) (lIlL) (2J.1L)

0.04 1 0.08 I 0.16

0.04 10.08" fQ16

0.04 1 0.08 I 0.16

0.04 10.08 1 0.16

0.08 ] 0.16 .I 0.32

0.08 ] 0.16 Ib.32

0.08 ] 0.16 J 0.32 .

0.08 IO.16 J 0.32

0.4 1 0.8 11.6

0.04 0.08 0.16

0.08 J 0.16 .I 0.32

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

I Decachlor~biphenyl

INDIVIDUAL STANDARD - - ~-- - . MIXTURE B -- HIGH I Compounds I Total nanograms I Total nanograms : Total nanograms I

I~::~B~~

(0.5uL) (lJJL) (2JAL)

10.04 . 10.08 - 0.16

10.04 10.08 0.16 I A-Id;i; --- 0.04 0.08 0..16

IHeptachlor epoxide ~ 0.04 1

0

.

08 I 0.16

_ ..- -

,

! aloha-Chlordane 0.04 0.08 0.16

I g~ma-Chlordane 1 0.04 0.08 I 0.16

4,4'-DDE f 0.08 0.16 ) 0.32

Endosulfan sulfate 0.08 0.16 0.32

I Endrin aldehyde 1 0.08 0.16 J 0.32

I Endrin ketone 1 0.08 0.16 .10.

32

IEndosulfan II ] 0.08 0.16 .I 0.32

. -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.04 0.08 1 0.16

Decachlorobiphenyl 0.08 0.16 0.32

I

.compounds Total nanograms Total nanograms Total nanograms

(O.5~) (l!JL) (2J.1L)

MULTI-RESPONSE STANDARD MIXTURES

I Aroclor-1016 l~O_.O_S 1_0_.1 ,[01_-· 1

1700 W. Albany Broken Arrow. OK. 74012-1421

('.13'

(918)251-2858

TIERRA-A-017962
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

I Aroc1or-1221 0.1 0.2 0.4

Arnclor.1232 0.05 0.1 I

0.2

I A~~~i~~-i242 0.05 0.1 10.2

I Aroc1or-1248 0.05 0.1 10.2 I

IAroclor-1254 0.05 0.1 0.2

Aroclor-1260 0.05 0.1 0.2

Toxaphene 0.25 0.5 1.0

All manual integrations in this data package for GCIEC have been performed for one of the

following reasons:

a. Data system missed a peak during processing.

b. Data system improperly integrated a peak.

Icertify that this data package is in compliance with the tenns and conditions of the contract,

both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of

the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer-readable data submitted on

diskette has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified by the

following signature.

Brett R Dees

GC Laboratory Supervisor

August 20, 1997

\.

1700 W. Albany Broken Arrow, OK. 74012-1421

r·131

(918)251-2858

TIERRA-A-017963
Alkane Report for Sample: BSE46

Data file: vlB472.d Matrix: SOIL

CAS i

1) 638-67-5

2) 112-95-8

3) 601-58-1

4) 36441-74-4

5) 112-95-8

6) 36728-72-0

7) 36728-72-0

8) 473-55-2

Compound

Tricosane

Eicosane

Stigmastane

Baccharane

Eicosane

"28-Nor-17.beta.(H)-hopane

28-Nor-17.beta.(H)-hopane

Bicyclo[3.1.l]heptane, 2,6,6-trimethylConcentration units: water: UG/L Soil: UG/KG

Page: 1

R.T.

16.35-

17.4~

17.55-

18.07-

18.57-

18.78-

19.23"-

21.88-

Estimated

Cone.

2474.65

1448.08

1129.67

1018.07

1989.11

2326.63

2215.49

1083.54

c

v

TIERRA-A-017964
Data file

CAS #

1) 921-47-1

2) 2216 -33-3

3) 79=34 -5

4) 2216-34-4

5) 565-75-3

6) 17312-55-9

7) 629-94-7

8) 13475-76-8

9) 2146-39-6

Alkane Re;Port for Sample

v18477.d Matrix: SOIL

Compound.

Hexane, 2,3,4-tr~ethylOctane, 3-methyl- .

Ftl:lane, 1,1, 2, z-atIachloroOctane, 4-methyl.--.

Pentane, 2,3,4 -tr:t.1TlethylDecane, 3,8-dimet~1-

Heneicosane

Docosane, 11-butylBicyclo[2.2.1]hept&~e, 2-ethenylConcentration Units: Water: UG/L Soil: UG/KG

BSE47

R.T.

3.082 .....

3.125"-

3.42}

3.513-

3.5Sa16.34-

17.49-

18.55-

21.9Y

Page. 1

Estimated

Cone.

256.07

271. 33

1641.01 f- 

477.43 e!!J

511.62

333.79

305.74

519.51

551.38

10·

TIERRA-A-017965
-

Data file

.....

CAS #

1) 619-99-8

2) 2216-33-3

3) 16747-31-2

4) 473-5.-2

5) 74764-47-9

6) 1560-92-5

7) 112-95-8

8) 630-01-3

9) 69466-45-1

Alkane Report for Sample BS:C48

v18478.d Matrix': SOIL

Compound

Hexane, 3-ethylOctane, 3-methylHexane, 3,3,4-trimethylBicyclo[3.1.1] heptane, 2,6,6-trimethylCyclopentane, l-methyl-l-{2-methyl-2-pro

Hexadecane, 2-methylEicosane

Hexacosane

l,2-Dithiacyclotetradecane

Concentration Units: Water: UG/L Soil: UG/KG

-.~'\

Page: 1

R.T.

3.081-

3.124-

3.587-

10.32-

10.69-

16.34-

17.48 ...

18.55 ....

20.50 -

f·· ......

Estimated

Cone.

612.82

475.71

847.41

725.64

486.87

520.73

415.67

816.83

651. 84

TIERRA-A-017966
Alkane Report for Sample SBLK ~ Page: 1

Data file v18387a.d Matrix : SOIL

'~

Estimated

CAS # Compound R.T. Cone.

- ----"

1) 2216-33-3 Octane, 3-methyl.- 2.953'" 329.51

2) 619-99-8 Hexane, 3-ethyl- 3.082- 209.20

3) 2216-34-4 Octane, 4-methyl- 3.125 - 102.46

4) 2216-33-3 Octane, 3-methyl- 3.168- 92.66

5) 760-21-4 Pentane, 3-methyLene- 3.265- 77.73

6) 61142-21-0 Cyclohexane, (1,.2,,2-trimethylbutyl)- 3.631- 269.82

7} 590-66-9 Cyclohexane, l,l.-dimethyl- 3.663- 407.90

Concentration Units: Water: UG/L Soil: UG/KG

'-',

.

\.

r' /1-{ f ...., -

12·

TIERRA-A-017967
Data file

CAS #

l} 2216-30-0

2} 3074-71-3

3) 2216 -33-3

4) 7:9;4 9

5) 16747-31-2

6) 4291-79-6

Alkane Report for Sample

v18424.d Matrix :

Compound

Heptane, 2,S-dimethylHeptane, 2,3-dimethylOctane, 3-methylEtnane, ',l.;2,;;;l t::et~acltloLoHexane, 3,3,4-trimethylCyclohexane, 1-methyl-2-propylConcentration Units: Water: UG/L Soil: UG/KG

-,-

SBLK ~ bt- Page:

~JI~tr

SOIL P'"

R.T.

2.933 -

3.105-

3.148-

3.450

3.611-

3.643-

1

Estimated

Gonc.

170.28

66.71

80.72

3 0 6 • 6 6 S"1'!;-

124. 61 ~

143.34

.... :,' 13 .

TIERRA-A-017968
SAMPLE DELIVERYGROUP (SDG)

TR..<\FFICREPORT (TR) COVER SHEET

-.

LAB NAME: sm.rrHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA CONTRACT NO.: ...:6;;;8-=-D;;;5..;;-O~02:.::6:..-...,,--__

LAB CODE: SWOK CASE NO.:.--=2;.;;.5.=.60.;...1~_ SAS NO.: _

,

;'

(

(

\

FULL SAMPLE ANALYSIS PRICE IN CONTRACT:

SOG No./First Sample in SDO:

(Lowest EPA Sample Number

in:first shipment of samples

received under SOG).

BSE46 Sample Receipt Date: 08/01/97

(MM/DD/YV)

Last Sample inSOO:

(Highest EPA Sample Number

inlast shipment of samples

received under SDG).

BSE48 Sample Receipt Date: 08/01/97

(MM/DD/YV)

EPA Sample Numbers inthe SOO (listed in alphanumeric order):

Note: There are a maximum of 20 field samples ina SDG.

Attach Traffic Reports to. this form in alphanumeric order

(i.e., the order listed on this form).

Date

..... ",. 14

TIERRA-A-017969
lA

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

-\ab Name: SWL-TULSA

I

Contract: 6S-D5-0026

BSE46RE

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601 SAS No. : SDG No.: BSE46

--Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 30412.10RA

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: C25341.D

Level: (low/med) LOW

% Moisture: not dec@

GC Column:DB-624 ID: 0.53 (mm)

Date Received: OS/01/97

Date Analyzed: 08/07/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND

Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q

Soil Extract Volume: ____ (uL)

74-87-3---------Chloromethane 29 U ~

74-83-9---------Bromomethane 29 U

75-01-4---------Vinyl Chloride 29 U

75-00-3---------Chloroethane 29 U

75-09-2---------Methylene Chlor~de 29 U

67-64-1---------Acetone 29 U

75-1S-0---------Carbon Disulfide 29 U

75-3S-4---------1,1-Dichloroethene 29 U

75-34-3-~-------l,l-Dichloroethane 29 U

540-59-0--------1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 29 U

67-66-3---------Chloroform

- 29 U

lO7-06-2--------1,2-Dichloroethane 29 U

78-93-3---------2-Butanone 29 U

71-55-6---------1, 1,I-Trichloroethane 29 U

56-23-S---------Carbon Tetrachloride 29 U

7S-27-4---------Bromodichloromethane 29 U

78-87-S---------1,2-Dichloropropane 29 U

10061-01-5---~--cis-l/3-Dichloropropene 29 U

79-01-6---------Trichloroethene 29 U

124-48-1--------Dibromochloromethane 29 U

79-00-S---------1,l,2-Trichloroethane 29 U

71-43-2---------Benzene 29 U

10061-02-6------trans-1,3-D~chloropropene 29 U

7S-2S-2---------Bromoform --

29 U ,"

108-10-1--------4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 29 U R.

S91-78-6--------2-Hexanone 29 U

127-18-4--------Tetrachloroethene 29 U

79-34-S---------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 29 U

108-88-3--------Toluene

-- 29 U

108-90-7--------Chlorobenzene 29 U

lOO-41-4--------Ethylbenzene 29 U

lOO-42-S--------Styrene 29 U

1330-20-7-------Xylene (Total) 29 U

FORM I VOA OLM03.0

35

TIERRA-A-017970
1E

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NO.

.... --..,

"ab Name: SWL-TULSA

I

Lab Code: SWOK

Contract: 68-05-0026

BSE46RE

Case No.: 25601 SAS No. : SOG No.: BSE46

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab ~ample IO: 30412.10RA

Level: (low/med)

5.0 (g/mL) G

LOW

Lab File IO: C2534l.D Sample wt/vol:

Soil Extract Volume:

IO: 0.53 (mm)

____ (uL)

Oate Received: 08/01/97

Date Analyzed: 08/07/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

% Moisture: not dec. 66

GC Column:OB-624

Number TICs found: 3

Soil Aliquot Volume:

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

___ (uL)

CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q

================ ============================ ======== ============= =====

l. cyclotrisiloxane 12.542 31 J

2 . Cyclotetrasiloxane 14.729 32 J

3. UNKNOWN 16.552 34 J

4. I 5. I

I I I I

6. I I I I

7.______ I I --------11

---- ~ ---I_-I -~=-----I I

"I--~j-I

.

1 ~ I-------II---

.\=-

8 .

9.

0

10. I

11- I

12. I

13. I

14. I

15.

16.

17.

18. I

19. I

20. I

21- I

22.

23. I

24. I

25. I

_.

26. I

27. I

28. -- I

29.

30.

1_-_ 1

- 1

11

-

1----------

--- -----[--

FORM I VOA-TIC OLM03.0

r .{L(~

r:. 'I . 36

TIERRA-A-017971
1A

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS OATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NC.

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G

BSE47

Contract: 68-05-0026

SAS No. : SOG No. : BSE46

Lab Sample ID: 30412.11

Lab File ID: L27093.0

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Analyzed: 08/06/97

"'.......... . Fb Name: SWL-TULSA

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Level: (low/med) LOW,

% Moisture, not de~

GC Column:DB-624 : 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND

Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q

Soil Extract Volume: ___ (uL)

74-87-3---------Chloromethane 26 U :r

74-83-9---------Bromomethane 26 U

75-0l-4---------Vinyl Chloride 28 U

7S-00-3---------Chloroethane 28 U

75-09-2---------Methylene chlor~ae 28 U

67-64-l---------Acetone 28 U

7S-15-0---------Carbon DisulfJ.de 28 U

7S-35-4---------l,1-Dichloroethene 28 U

7S-34-3--~------1,1-Dichloroethane 28 U

540-59-0--------1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 28 U

67-66-3---------Chloroform

- 28 U

lO7-06-2--------l,2-Dichloroethane 28 U

78-93-3---------2-Butanone 28 U

7l-55-6---------l,1,1-Trichloroethane 26 U

56-23-S---------Carbon Tetrachloride 28 U

75-27-4---------Bromodichloromethane 28 U

7B-67-S---------1,2-Dichloropropane 28 U

1006l-0l-5------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 28 U

79-01-6---------Trichloroethene 28 U

l24-48-l--------Dibromochloromethane 28 U

79-00-5---------1,1,2-Trichloroethane 28 U

7l-43-2---------Benzene 28 U

10061-02-6------trans-l,3-DJ.chloropropene 28 U

75-25-2---------Bromoform ---

28 U

108-l0-1--------4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 28 U

591-78-6--------2-Hexanone 28 U

127-18-4--------Tetrachloroethene 28 U

79-34-5---------1, 1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane 28 U

lO8-88-3--------Toluene -- 28 U

lO8-90-7--------Chlorobenzene 28 U

lOO-41-4--------Ethylbenzene 28 U

lOO-42-S--------Styrene 28 U

1330-20-7-------Xylene (Total) 28 U

~

FORM I VOA OLM03.0

f·14b

43

TIERRA-A-017972
1£:

VOLATILE ORGANICS ~ALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY ID~T~FIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NO.

~- rb Name: SWL-TULSA

Contract: 6B-DS-0026

BSE47

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 2.9§OJ SAS No. : SDG No.: BSE46

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Lab Sample ID: 30412.11

Level: (low/med)

5.0 (g/m~) 6'

LOW

Lab File ID: L27093.D

sample wt/vol:

Soil Extract Volume:

ID: O. 53" (\-n~)

___ (uL)

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Analyzed: 08/06/97

: ~lution Factor: 1.0

% Moisture: not dec. 64

GC Colurnn:DB-624

~"T'IONUNI::~:

.) 17':'- ':~G

Number TICs found: 0

CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND :

================ =============~===

1. I _.

;: . I =-

4. _

5. I-----=~~

6. _

7. 1--------

8. I-----~-

9. I-----~--

10. I 11. ---------

12. I-----~-

13. 1--------

14. I

15. I-----~~~

16 . 1-----'""----

17. I 18. --------

19. I------~-

20. I 21. -------=---

22. 1--------

23. _

24. 1------...;.;..,--

25 . I ~ ......._

26. _

27. -----~~~

28. _

29. ----------

30.

------

:C3T. CONC. Q

~:======== =~===

--- ---

f--

......

----,--- -1---

-_ .._\

---

.. I

- --

I

I

.- -

- I

_.

I

-_......---------- .--- .'. - I I

._---_ ...--- I- ....._- --

I

-- --1--·' I

-- -

=

-=- - -

'~IVJ I VOA-TIC OLM03.0

l; '~ 44

TIERRA-A-017973
1A

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BSE48

"rJabName: SWL-TULSA Contract: 68-D5-0026

( .

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601 SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 30412.12

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: L27094.D

Level: (low/med) LOW ., .. ".

% Moisture: not dec~

GC Column:DB-624 ID: 0.53 (mm)

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Analyzed: 08/06/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Soil Extract Volume: ____ (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q

74-87-3---------Chloromethane 42 U

74-83-9---------Bromomethane 42 U

75-01-4---------Vinyl Chloride 42 U

7S-00-3---------Chloroethane 42 U

75-09-2---------Methylene Chlor~de 42 U

67-64-1---------Acetone 76 LA

75-15-0---------Carbon Disulf~de 42 U

75-35-4---------1,1-Dichloroethene 42 U

75-34-3---------1,1-Dichloroethane 42 U

540-59-0--------1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 42 U

67-66-3---------Chloroform - 42 U

107-06-2--------1,2-Dichloroethane 42 U

78-93-3---------2-Butanone 30 J

71-55-6---------1, 1,1-Trichloroethane 42 U i

56-23-5---------Carbon Tetrachloride 42 U I

75_27-4---------Bromodichloromethane 42 U !

78-B7-5---------1,2-Dichloropropane 42 U i

10061-01-5------cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 42 U I

79-o1-6---------Trichloroethene 42 U

1

!

124-48-1--------Dibrornochloromethane 42 U !

79-00-S---------1,1,2-Trichloroethane 42 U

\

71-43-2---------Benzene 42 U

i

10061-02-6------trans-l,3-D~chloropropene 42 U

i

j

75-25-2---------Bromoform -- 42 U i

lOB-IO-1--------4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 42 U

\ 591-7S-6--------2-Hexanone 42 U

127-1S-4--------Tetrachloroethene 42 U \

79-34-5---------1,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 42 U

lOB-88-3--------Toluene -- 42 U

lOB-90-7--------Chlorobenzene 42 U

100-41-4--------Ethylbenzene 42 ·U

lOO-42-5--------Styrene 42 U

1330-20-7-------Xylene (Total) 42 u

FORM I VOA OLM03.0

0- " 47

TIERRA-A-017974
IE

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NO.

iab Name: SWL-TULSA Contract: 68-D5-0026

BSE48

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601 SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample 1D: 30412.12

Level: (low/medl

'5.0 (g/mL) G

LOW

Lab File ID: L27094.D sample wt/vol:

Soil Extract Volume:

ID: O. 53 (mm)

___ (uL}

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Analyzed: 08/06/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Soil Aliquot Volume: __ (uL)

% ,Moisture: not dec. 76

GC Column:DB-624

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

··~=~~~~=·-=I=·===--=:~~~~~~-~~~=====-- ===~:===l==~::~=~~~:~=

2. I I I I I

3. I I I I I

4. I I I I I

S. I I I I I

;: I I I I I

8. I I I I I

1~: II I I I I

11. I I I I

i~: I I Ii I I

14. II I II I I

15. I I I I

16. I I II I I

i~: I I I I I 19. _

20. 1---- ------ --

21. _

22. I-------------·!---- ------1---

;~: "II 25 . ;=-::::::~~~~==============_=_=__=__=---- --------- 26 . 1 _ 27. ----1------- ---I

28. ~

29.1- 30 .I~-~-------------

-- 1 ---- ------- ---

FORM I VOA-TIC OLM03.0

.+ I' <f: A 8

TIERRA-A-017975
lB

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NU J

BSE46

...- l.bName: SWL-TULSA

!

Contract: 68-D5-0026

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 2S601 SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

Sample wt/vol:

Level: (low/med) ...

30.1 (g/mL) G

LOW

Lab File ID: V18472.D

Lab Sample ID: 30412.10 - -~ - Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

% Moisture: 66 decanted: (Y/N) N

SOO(uL)

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Concentrated Extract Volume:

Injection Volume: 2.0{UL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ugJL or uq/Kg) UG/KG Q

108-95-2--------Phenol 970 U

111_44_4 ________ bis(2_Chloroethyl)Ether 970 U

9S-S7-8---------2-chloro1

henol 970 U

S41-73-1--------1,3-Dich orobenzene 970 U

106-46-7--------1,4-Dichlorobenzene 970 U

95-S0-1---------1,2-Dichlorobenzene 970 U

9S-48-7---------2-MethylEhenol 970 U

108-60-1--------2,21-0~ is (1-Chlor9propane) , 970 U

106-44-5--------4-M~thy phe~ol i 970 U

621-64-7--------N-N~troso-d~-n-propylamine-- 970 U

67-72-1---------Hexachloroethane 970 U

98-95-3---------Nitrobenzene 970 U

78-59-1---------Iso~horone 970 U

88-75-5---------2-N~trophenol 970 U

105-67-9--------2,4-Dimethylphenol 970 U

111-91-1--------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 970 U

120-83-2--------2,4-Dichlorophenol --

970 U

120-82-1--------1, 2,4-Trichlorobenzene 970 U

91-20-3---------Naphthalene 970 U

106-47-8--------4-Chloroaniline 970 U

87-68-3---------Bexachlorobutadiene 970 U

59-50-7---------4-Chloro-3-MethrlPhenol 970 U

91-57-6---------2-Methylnaphtha ene 58 J

77-47-4---------Hexachloroc 1

clopentadiene 970 U

88-06-2---------2,4,6-Trich orophenol --- 970 U

95-95-4---------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2400 U

91-S8-7---------2-Chlorona 1hthalene 970 u

88-74-4---------2-Nitroani ine 2400 U

131-11-3--------nimethhlEhthalate 970 U

208-96-8--------Acena~ t ylene 200 J

606-20-2--------2,6-D~nitrotoluene 970 U

99-09-2---------3-Nitroaniline 2400 U

83-32-9---------Acenaphthene 210 J

'\

FORM I SV-1

,.[)"O

'If

OLM03.0

220

TIERRA-A-017976
1C

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BSE46

.--rb Name: SWL-TULSA

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601

-- Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Contract: 68-05-0026

SAS No.: SOG No.: BSE46

Concentrated Extract Volume: 500(uL)

Lab Sample IO: 30412.10

Lab File ID: VIB472.D

Date Received: OB/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Sample wt/vol:

Level: (low/med)

t Moisture: 66

30.1 (g/mL) G

LOW

decanted: (Y/N) N

Injection volume: 2.0{uL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q

51-2B-S---------2,4-Dinitrophenol 2400 u

100-02-7--------4-Nitrophenol 2400 U

132-64-9--------Dibenzofuran 100 {

121-14-2--------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 970

84-66-2---------Diethylphthalate 970 U

700S-72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __ 970 U

86-73-7---------Fluorene 230 J

100-01-6--------4-Nitroan~1~ne 2400 U

534_52-1--------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2400 u

86-30-6---------N-Nitrosodiphenhlamine (1)-- 970 U

101-55-3--------4-Bromophenyl-p enylether -- 970 U

118-74-1--------Hexachlorobenzene ---

970 U

87-86-5---------Pentachlorophenol 2400 U

85-01-B---------Phenanthrene 3100

120-12-7--------Anthracene 750 t

86-74-8---------Carbazole 430

84-74-2---------Di-n-but~lPhthalate 580 '~

206-44-0--------Fluorant ene 5800

129-00-0--------Pyrene 6000

B5-68-7--------~Butylbenzrlphthalate 1900

91-94-1---------3,3'-Dich orobenzidine 970 U

56-SS-3---------Benzo(a) anthracene 3200

218-01-9--------Chrysene 3700

117-81-7--------bis(2-EthrlhexyI)phthaiate 6900 , 117-84-0--------Di-n-octy phthalate --

220

205-99-2--------Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3200

207-08-9--------Benzo{k)fluoranthene 2800

50-32-B---------Benzo(a)pyrene 3300

193-39-5--------Indeno{1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2400

53-70-3-------~-Dibenz(a,h}anthracene 960 .J

191-24-2--------Benzo(g,h,~)perylene 3000

\

I

t

''-'

(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine

FORM I SV-2 OLM03.0

p.I~1

", . 221

TIERRA-A-017977
IF

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

EFA SAMPLE NO.

BSE46

,b Name: SWL-TULSA

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Contract: 68-D5-0026

SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

Concentrated Extract Volume: 500(uL)

Lab Sampl~~D: 30412.10

Lab File 1D: V18472.D

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

sample wt/vol:

Level: (low/med)

% Moisture: 66

30.1 (g/mL) G

LOW

decanted: (Y/N) N

Injection Volume: 2.0(uL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.0

Number TICs found: 35

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

. CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONe. Q

================ ============================ ======== ===-========= :==;===

1- 141-79-7 3-Penten-2-one, 4-methyl- 2.728 ~

-mAB

~ 2. 123-42-2 2-Pentanone, 4-hydroxy-4-met 2.986 . -_v -NtTAB

3. -Anhydro-.beta.-D-glucopyran 7.463 2400 J

4. UNKNOWN ORGANIC ACID 10.337 1600 J

5. UNKNOWN ORGANIC ACID 10.692 980 J

6. UNKNOWN PAR 11.349 1100 J

7. UNKNOWN 12.425 1400 J

8. UNKNOWN 13.060 1500 J

9. 72-54-8 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlor 13.921 1300 NJ

10. UNKNOWN AMIDE 14.362 .... -_ ... ~ K

11- 50-29-3 Chlorophenothane 14.491 1400 NJ

12. UNKNOWN 15.072 1600 J

13. UNKNOWN 15.675 2200 J

14. UNKNOWN 15.750 1800 J

15. UNKNOWN 15.826 1700 J

16. UNKNOWN 15.923 1500 J

17. -Dodecatrien--ol, -trimethy 17.193, 1100 J

18. UNKNOWN PAR 17.7631 1600 J

19. 0-00-0 1-Methyl-2,6-diphenyl-4,4-pe 18.021 960 NJ

20. UNKNOWN 18.301 1100i J

21- UNKNOWN 18.409 1300 J

22. UNKNOWN 18.656 1600 J

23. UNKNOWN 18.828 1900 J

24. UNKNOWN 19.054 1400 J

25. UNKNOWN 19.668 1300 J

26. UNKNOWN 19.786 1800 J

27. UNKNOWN PAR 19.851 1800 J

28. UNKNOWN PAR 19.926 900 J

29. UNKNOWN 20.185 1800 J

30. UNKNOWN 20.249 2000 J

- - -

..

FORM I SV-TIC

p. IS-I. r•. "

OLM03.0

222

TIERRA-A-017978
1F

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NO.

ab Name: SWL-TULSA Contract: 68-D5-0026

BSE46

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601 SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G

Level: (low/med) LOW

Lab Sample ID: 30412.10

Lab File ID: V18472.D

% Moisture: 66 decanted: (Y/N) N

500(uL)

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Concentrated Extract volume:

Injection Volume: 2.0(uL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.0

Number TICs found: 35

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/~ or ug/Kg) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q

================ ============================ ======== ============= =====

1. UNKNOWN 20.357 800 J

2. UNKNOWN 20.658 1200 J

3. UNKNOWN 20.863 2200 J

4. UNKNOWN 21. 089 1000 J

5. UNKNOWN 22.412 1400 J

6.

7.

8.

9. I------- 10. ---- ------- ----

11. ----- 12. ---- ---=--- ---

13. ------- 14. ---~'1~----- ---

15. ,- 1

16. ,- ----1------ ---I ______,,' --------l=-~--!------- --

17 • "1 ------ ---~ ------- ---

18. 19 .------·'1-------------- ---~ ------- ---

20. '1------------- ---- ------- ---

21. 'I 22. ',------------- ---- ------- ---

23.4 "\------------- ---- ------- ---II

25. "1------------- ---- ------- ---II

26.7 "'-1-------------

28. J ---- ------- ---I

29. -' ------- ---I

30. _1 ---- ------- ---I

FORM I SV-TIC

po 1$"3

OLM03.0

'1? ") --....

TIERRA-A-017979
IB

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BSE47

-....'\bName: SWL-TULSA Contract: 68-05-0026

.uab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601 SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

Concentrated Extract Volume: 500{uL)

Lab Sample ID: 30412.11

Lab File ID: V18477.D

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

sample wt/vol:

Level: (low/med)

% Moisture: 64

30.1 (g/mL) G

LOW

decanted: (Y/N) N

Injection Volume: 2.0(uL}

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(uq/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q

108-95-2--------Phenol 910 U

111_44_4 ________ bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 910 U \

95-57-8---------2-chloro1

henol 910 U

541-73-1--------1,3-D~ch orobenzene 910 U

106-46-7--------1,4-D~chlorobenzene 910 U i

95-50-1---------1,2-Dichlorobenzene 910 U

95-48-7---------2-MethylEhenol 910 U

108-60-1-~------2,21-0~ is(I-Chloropropane) 910 U

106-44-5--------4-Methy phenol 910 U

621-64-7--------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamlne __ 910 U

67-72-1---------Hexachloroethane 910 U

98-95-3---------Nitrobenzene 910 U

78-59-1---------Iso~horone 910 U

88-75-5---------2-N~trophenol 910 U

105-67-9--------2 {4-Dimethylphenol 910 U

111-91-1--------b~s(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 910 U

120-83-2--------2 4-Dichlorophenol --

910 U

, .

120-82-1--------1,2,4-Tr~chlorobenzene 910; U

91-20-3---------Naphthalene 910 U

106-47-8--------4-Chloroanil~ne 910 U

87-68-3---------Hexachlorobutad~ene 910 U

59-50-7---------4-chloro-3-MethrlPhenol 910 U

91-57-6---------2-Methylnaphtha ene 910 ' U

77-47-4---------Hexachlorocrclopentadiene 910 U

88-06-2---------2,4,6-Trich orophenol --- 910 U

95-95-4---------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2300 U

91-58-7---------2-chlorona1

hthalene 910 u

88-74-4---------2-Nitroani ine 2300 U

131-11-3--------DimethhlEhthalate 910 U

208-96-8--------Acena~ t ylene 910 U.

606-20-2--------2t6-D~nitrotoluene 910 U'

99-09-2---------3-Nitroaniline

I

2300 U . ,

83-32-9---------Acenaphthene 910 U. l'

FORM I SV-l OLM03.0

..., I 296

TIERRA-A-017980
1C

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMP~E NO.

BSE47

'b Name: SWL-TULSA

I

Contract: 68-05-0026

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601 SAS No.: SOG No.: BSE46

Concentrated Extract Volume: SOO(uL)

Lab Sample ID: 30412.11

Lab File 10: V18477.D

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:

Level: (low/med)

% Moisture: 64

30.1 (g/mL) G

LOW

decanted: (YjN) N

Injection Volume: 2.0(uL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ugjL or ugjKg) UG/KG Q

51-28-5---------2, 47Dinitrophenol 2300 U

100_02-7--------4-N~trophenol 2300 U

132_64_9--------Dibenzofuran 910 U

121_14_2--------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 910 U

84_66_2---------Diethylphthalate 910 U

7005_72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 910

86-73-7---------Fluorene· --

47 1

100_01-6--------4-Nitroanil~ne 2300 U

534_S2-1--------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2300 U

86_30_6 _________ N_Nitrosodiphen~lamine (1)-- 910 U

101-55-3--------4-Bromophenyl-p enylether -- 910 U

118_74-1--------Hexachlorobenzene ---

910 U

87_86-5---------pentachlorophenol 2300 U

8S_01-8---------Phenanthrene 610 .3

120-12-7--------Anthracene

170 ~

86-74-8---------Carbazole

910 U

84_74-2---------Di-n-but~lpfitfialate 910 U

206-44-0--------Fluorant ene 1100

129-00-0--------Pyrene

1100 a"1 8S_68_7 _________ Butylbenzrlphtfiaiate 230

91-94-1---------3,3'-Dich orobenzidine 910 U

56_55_3 _________ Benzo(a)anthracene 590 ~

218-01-9--------Chrysene

660 ~.4 117_81-7--------biS(2-Etfirlfiexyl)pfitfialate 910~

117-84-0--------Di-n-octy phthalate -- 910.

~ 205_99-2--------Benzo(b)fluoranthene 570

207_08-9--------Benzo(k)fluoranthene 470

~

SO_32-8---------Benzo(a)pyrene 640

193_39-5--------Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 440

~

53_70-3---------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 150

191_24-2--------Benzo(g,h,~)perylene 550 ,I

.:r

(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine

FORM I SV-2 OLM03.0

"I , 297

TIERRA-A-017981
1F

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BSE47

.,b Name: SWL-TULSA

I

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601

Matrix: (soil/wa-ter) SOIL

sample "wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G

Level: (low/med) LOW ...

Contract: 68-05-0026

SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

% Moisture: 64 decanted: (Y/N) N

500(uL)

Lab Sample ID: 30412.11

Lab File ID: V18477.0

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Concentrated Extract Volume:

Injection Volume: 2.0{uL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.0

Number TICs found: 33

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q

================ =====================~====== ========= ============= =====

1- UNKNOWN 2.695 4400 J

2. 10574-37-5 2-Pentene, 2,3-dimethyl- 2.717 C"7nn ---NJA

3. UNKNOWN 2.781 1400 JB

4. UNKNOWN 2.878 3400

~~I

5. 123-42-2 2-Pentanone, 4-hydroxy-4-met 2.986 4~

6. UNKNOWN 3.040 830 J

7. UNKNOWN 3.621 990 JB

8. UNKNOWN 4.245 330 J

9. UNKNOWN 10.326 230 J

10. UNKNOWN PAB 11.348 200 J

11- 11H-Benzo[]fluorene 13.598 260 J

12. UNKNOWN AMIDE 14.351 --- JB13. UNKNOWN AMIDE 16.955 "~:~ ~-I

14. -Octadien--ol, -dimethyl-, a 17.181

15. 192-97-2 Benzo[e]pyrene 17.752 450 NJ

16. UNKNOWN 18.301 300 J

17. UNKNOWN 18.677 270· J

18. UNKNOWN 18.785 600 J

19. UNKNOWN 19.054 520 J

20. UNKNOWN 19.356 300 J

21- UNKNOWN 19.420 250 J

22. UNKNOWN 19.775 290 J

23. UNKNOWN PAB 19.829 300 J

24. UNKNOWN 20.163 680 J

25. UNKNOWN 20.238 310 J

26. UNKNOWN 20.378 240 J

27. UNKNOWN 20.507 420 J

28. UNKNOWN 20.625 250 J

29. UNKNOWN 20.647 260 J

30. UNKNOWN 20.895 530 J

-

FORM I SV-TIC

p./~6

OLM03.0

r', ,qH

TIERRA-A-017982
1F

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ~ALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDE~IFIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NO.

,b Name: SWL-TULSA Contract: 68-D5-0026

BSE47

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 2S£01 SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

Concentrated Extract Volume: 500(uL}

Lab Sample ID: 30412.11

Lab File ID: V18477.D

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:

Level: (low/med)

% Moisture: 64

30.1 (g/mL') G

LOW

decanted: C~/N) N

Injection Volume: 2.0(uL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pB$ 7.0

Number TICs found: 33

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

.

CAS NUMBER COMPOuND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q

================ ==============-~============ ======== =-============= =====

l. UNKNOWN 21.078 510 J

2. UNKNOWN 21.121 220 J

3. UNKNOWN PAH 21.971 330 J

4.

5. I I I

6.1---- ------ --1\

7. 1---- ------ ---

8. II I

9. I

10.

ll.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21~

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

I

-

I I

I I 1

I I I

I I I

I I I

I I I

I I I

I I I

I I I

I, I I

I

I I I

I

I I

:1

I I,

I II

'I I I I

.1

.1

I I-- I

I

I

FORM I SV-TIC

1'_ /S+ Y" ,.

OLM03.0

.-,.:.4

... ,.1_

TIERRA-A-017983
IB

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPL~ :w.

BSE48

"·.....ab Name: SWL-TULSA

I

~ab' Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601

__ Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Contract: 68-D5-0026

SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

Lab Sample ID: 30412.12

Sample wt/vol:

Level: (low/med)

% Moisture: 76

30.0 (g/mL) G

LOW

decanted: (Y/N) N

Lab File ID: V18478.D

Concentrated Extract Volume: 500(uL)

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor:· 1.0

Injection Volume: 2.0(uL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.2

CAS NO. COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q

10S-9S-2--------Phenol 1400 U ~. 11

111_44_4--------bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 1400 U 1

9S-S7-S---------2-chlorolhenol 1400 U

541-73-1--------1,3-Dich orobenzene 1400 U

106_46_7 ________ 1,4_Dichlorobenzene 1400 U

9S_S0_1 _________ 1

,2_Dichlorobenzene 1400 U

9S-48-7---------2-MethyIEhenol 1400 U

108-60-1--------2'2r-oXI is(1-Chloropropane) 1400 U

106-44-5--------4-Methy phenol 1400 U

621_64-7--------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1400 U

67-72-1---------Hexachloroethane --

1400 U

98-9S-3---------Nitrobenzene 1400 U

78-S9-1---------Iso~horone 1400 U

88-75-5---------2-N~trophenol 1400 U

10S-67-9--------2,4-Dimethylphenol 1400 U

111_91_1 ________ bis(2-Chloroetho~)methane 1400 U

120-83-2--------2 4-Dichloropheno --

1400 U

, .

120-82-1--------1,2,4-Tr~chlorobenzene 1400 U

91-20-3---------Naphthalene 1400 U

106-47-8--------4-Chloroaniline 1400 U

87-68-3---------Bexachlorobutadiene 1400' U

59-50-7---------4-chloro-3-Methrlphenol 1400 U

91-57-6---------2-Methylnaphtha ene 1400 U

77-47-4---------HeXachlorocrclopentadiene 1400 U

88-06-2---------2,4,6-Trich orophenol --- 1400 U

95-95-4---------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 3400 U

91-S8-7---------2-chlorona1

hthalene 1400 U I

88-74-4---------2-Nitroani ine 3400 ~\ 131-11-3--------Dimeth~lphthalate 1400

208-96-8--------Acena~ thylene 1400

606-20-2-----~--2,6-D~nitrotoluene 1400

99-09-2---------3-Nitroaniline 3400 u \

83-32-9---------Acenaphthene 1400 U:-J

FORM I 5V-l OLM03.0

-'

365

TIERRA-A-017984
1C

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EFA SAl·1PLENO.

/- "'.b Name: SWL-TULSA

,

Contract: 68-D5-0026

BSE48

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601 SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

Concentrated Extract Volume: 500(uL)

Lab S~ple-ID: 30412.12

Lab File ID: V18478.D

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

sample wt/vol:

Level: (low/med)

% Moisture: 76

30.0 (g/mL) G

LOW

decanted: (Y/N) N

Injection volume: 2.0(uL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.2

CAS NO. COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG!KG Q

51-28-5---------2,47Dinitrophenol 3400 U ~l

100-02-7--------4-N~trophenol 3400 U

132-64-9--------Dibenzofuran 1400 U

121-14-2--------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 1400 U

84_66-2---------Diethylphthalate 1400 U

7005_72_3 _______ 4_Chlorophenyl-phenylether __ 1400 U

86-73-7---------Fluorene 1400 U

100-01-6--------4-Nitroanil~ne 3400 U

534-52-1--------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylpheno! 3400 U

86-30-6---------N-Nitrosodiphenhlamine (1)--· 1400 U

101-55-3--------4-Bromophenyl-p enylether -- 1400 U

118-74-1--------Hexachlorobenzene ---

1400 U

87-86-5---------Pentachlorophenol 3400 U

, 1

85-01-B---------Phenanthrene 1400 U

120-12-7--------Anthracene 1400 U

86-74-8---------Carbazole 1400 U

84-74-2---------Di-n-but

h

lpbtbalate 1400 U

206-44-0--------Fluorant ene 390 jI"

129-00-0--------P yrene

380 3: I

85-68-7---------ButylbenzIlpfitfialate 120 \

91-94-1---------3,3'-Dich orobenzidine 1400 U I

56-55-3---------Benzo(a) anthracene 220 1- I 218-01-9--------Chrysene 28O,

117-81-7--------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ),{X11e e l.\CFB117-84-0--------Di-n-octylphthalate --

1400 U

I

20S-99-2--------Benzo(b)fluoranthene 250

~ 207-0B-9--------Benzo(k)fluoranthene 190

50-32-8---------Benzo(a)pyrene 260

~ 193-39-5--------Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 180

53-70-3---------Dibenz{a,h}anthracene 1400 U I

191-24-2--------Benzo(g,h,~)perylene 230 ~

J/

(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine

.~--"

FORM I SV-2 OLM03.0

p" " 366

TIERRA-A-017985
IF

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NO.

,

,

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601

BSE48

Contract: 6'8-05-0026

SAS No. : SDG No. : BSE46

Lab Sample ID: 30412.12

Lab File ID: V18478.D

"--'"\b Name: SWL-TULSA

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wtJvol: 30.0 (g/mL) G

Level: (low/med) LOW

Concentrated Extract Volume: 500(uL)

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

% Moisture: 76 decanted: (Y/N) N

Injection volume: 2.0(uL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.2

Number TICs found: 33

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

!-

!

CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME ==~~~;~~ra--E.-

RT

================ ============================ ========

1. 141-79-7 3-Penten-2-one, 4-methyl- 2.727

2. UNKNOWN 2.791 1mn'

3. UNKNOWN 2.888 5700 JB

4. 123-42-2 2-Pentanone, 4-hydroxy-4-met 2.996

5. mn--r UNKNOWN 3.049 1300 J

6. UNKNOWN 3.426 JB I

7. UNKNOWN "

~

750 g{

>8. UNKNOWN A \ \. ('-.'1\~,... •63i"', 1700 B

9. UNKNOWN 4.2"44 580 J

10. UNKNOWN ORGANIC ACID 8.366 420 J

11. UNKNOWN 10.529 340 J

12. 57-10-3 Hexadecanoic acid 11.337 430 NJ

13. UNKNOWN AMIDE 14.350 -.,.r-oJ"'" ~-- UP14. UNKNOWN 15.426 I 320 J

15. UNKNOWN 15.642 540 J

16. UNKNOWN 16.944 490 J

17. -Dodecatrien--ol,-trimethy 17.181 1000 J

lB. UNKNOWN 18.203 370 J

19. UNKNOWN 18.300 370 J

;

20. UNKNOWN 18.784 510 J

21. UNKNOWN 18.892 670 J

22. UNKNOWN 19.043 1100 J

23. UNKNOWN 19.226 370 J

24. UNKNOWN 19.817 380 J

25. UNKNOWN 19.904 390 J

26. UNKNOWN 20.173 870 J

27. UNKNOWN 20.226 460 J

28. UNKNOWN 20.646 630 J

29. UNKNOWN 20.851 410 J

30. UNKNOWN '21.077 780 J

'\._.

FORM I SV-TIC

p. (60

OLM03.0

367

TIERRA-A-017986
1F

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BSE48

..~...libName: SWL-TULSA Contract: 68-DS-0026

I

I

.&.JabCode: SWOK Case No.: 25601 SAS No.: SDG No.: BSE46

Concentrated Extract Volume: 500{uL)

Lab Sample ID: 30412.12

Lab File ID: V1847B.D

Date Received: 08/01/97

Date Extracted:08/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/12/97

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:

Level: (low/med)

% Moisture: 76

30.0 (g/mL) G

LOW

decanted: (Y/N) N

Injection volume: 2.0(uL)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y

Number TICs found: 33

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER RT

560

4600

540

J

J

J

================ ============================ ======== ============= '=====

COMPOUND NAME EST. CONC. Q

1. UNKNOWN

2. UNKNOWN

3. UNKNOWN 4. 1

5. ---- -------\'

6. ,--

7. 1'----

s.1 I

9. --- i~:--J---

12. _

13. --------------11-----1------- ---I

14 . I ~--_III

156

, 1 J=========== I

i7: \1 I ---I

lB. -~III

19. ~t---':I I

22. I

23. 'I 24. ,II-------=~~----

25. ----

26.:1 ----

27 • 1 _

28. ----

29. .

1

_

30.:\ ----

21.453

21. 862

23.326

I

I

j

II

I

I

I

I

FORM I SV-TIC

Y'.'i.{

OLM03.0

•• • 368

TIERRA-A-017987
1D

PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

,. ~ Name: SWL-TULSA

BSE46

Contract: 6B-D5-0026

Case No.: 25601 SAS No. : SDG No. : BSE46

SOIL Lab Sample ID: 30412.10

30.0 (g/rnL) G Lab File ID:

decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 08/01/97

Lab Code: SWOK

Matrix: (soil/water)

Sample wt/vol:

% Moisture:~ 66

Extraction: (sepF/Cont/Sonc)

concentrated Extract Volume:

SONC

5000 (uL) -

Date Extracted:OS/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/17/97

Injection Volume: 0.5(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.0 Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q

CAS NO. COMPOUND

319-84-6--------alpha-BHC __

319-85-7--------beta-BHC

319-86-8--------delta-BH~C------------------

58-89-9---------gamma-BHC (Lindane) _

76-44-8---------Heptachlor __

309-00-2--------Aldrin 1024-57-3-------Heptac-~h~1-o-r--e-p-o-x~i~d-e----------

959-98-8--------Endosulfan T

60-57-1---------Dieldr

72-55-9---------4,4'-D

72-20-8---------Endrin

3321.3-65-9------Endosu

72-54-8---------4,4'-D

1031-07-8-------Endosu

50-29-3-----~---4,4'-D

72-43-5---------Methoxy

53494-70-5------Endrin

7421-93-4-------Endrin

5103-71-9-------alpha5103-74-2-------gamma8001-35-2-------Toxaph

12674-11-2------Aroclo

11104-28-2------Aroclo

11141-16-5------Aroclo

53469-21-9------Aroclo

12672-29-6------Aroclo

11097-69-1------Aroclo

11096-82-5------Aroclo

5.0 U T

5.0 U

5.0 U

5.0 U

5.0 U

5.0 U

23 ...-P ,

180 "~' E

-

.

in 50 ..P"

DE I':"~. ~ - , en B

1.:ID- it lfan II

DD / <.o~~t'+'-

Ifan sulfate ., 9.7 ul

DT 5~,~' A::'" -&

ketone

chlor 9.7SOdU

aldehyde A.,,·-¥ ~40

Chlordane 1>-:' ~ m E

Chlordane 17C~ .... " - - ~-~ I ;£E

ene 500 U

r-1016 97' U

r-1221 200 U

r-1232 97 U

r-1242 97 U

r-1248 97 U

r-1254 97 U

r-1260 690 ~

f

f?,..

'.

FORM I PEST

P ./62.

OLM03.0

623

TIERRA-A-017988
1D

PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BSE47

~b Name: SWL-TULSA Contract: 68-05-0026

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601 SAS No.: SDG No. : BSE46

Lab Sample 1D: 30412.11

Lab File 10:

Date Received: OS/01/97

Date Extracted:OS/04/97

Date Analyzed: OB/17/97

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:

% Moisture: 64

30.0 (g/mL) G

decanted: (Y/N) N

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

Concentrated Extract Volume: 5000 (uL)

Injection Volume: O.S(uL)

. pH: 7.0

Dilution Factor: 1.0

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG CAS NO. COMPOUND Q

, '

319-84-6--------alpha-BHC 4.7 U

319-8S-7--------beta-BHC 4.7 U

319-86-S--------delta-BHC 4.7 U

SB-89-9---------gamma-BHC (LJ.ndane) 4.7 U

76-44-B---------Heptachlor 4.7 U

309-00-2--------Aldrin 4.7 U

1024-S7-3-------Heptachlor epoxide 4.7 U

959-98-B--------Endosulfan I

4.7 U

60-57-1---------Dieldrin 9.2 U

72-SS-9---------4,4'-DDE 9.2 U

72-20-8---------Endrin 9.2 U

33213-6S-9------Endosulfan II 9.2 U

72-S4-8---------4,4'-DDD 9.2 U

1031-07-8-------Endosulfan sulfate 9.2 ): SO-29-3---------4,4'-DDT 48

72-43-S---------Methoxychlor 47 U

53494-70-S------Endrin ketone 9.2 U

7421-93-4-------Endrin aldehyde 72 .'¥

5103-71-9-------alpha-Chlordane 4.7 U

Sl03-74-2-------gamma-Chlordane 4.7 U

8001-35-2-------Toxaphene 470 U

12674-11-2------Aroclor-1016 92 U

11104-28-2------Aroclor-1221 190 U

11141-16-S------Aroclor-1232 92 U

53469-21-9------Aroclor-1242 92 U

12672-29-6--~---Aroclor-124B 92 U

11097-69-1------Aroclor-1254 92 U

11096-82-S------Aroclor-1260 320 ~

FORM I PEST

f' {(,"J

I

!

I

\

I

I

\

(j S;j

OLM03.0

TIERRA-A-017989
. -,

~D

PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BSE4B

~b Name: SWL-TULSA Contract: 6S-D5-0026

Lab Code: SWOK Case No.: 25601 SAS No.: SDG No. : BSE46

Lab Sample ID: 30412.12

Lab File ID:

Date Received: OS/01/97

Date Extracted:Oa/04/97

Date Analyzed: 08/17/97

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:

% Moisture: 76

30.0 (g/mL) G

decanted: (Y/N) N

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

Concentrated Extract Volume: 5000 (uL)

Injection Volume: O.S(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: 7.2 Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

.'

:.-'

CAS NO. COMPOUND Q

319~84-6--------alpha-BHC 7.1 U :f

319-85-7--------beta-BHC 7.1 U I

319-86-8--------delta-BHC 7.1 U

58-89-9---------gamrna-BHC (Lindane) 7.1 U

76-44-B---------Heptachlor 16 .J! {

309-00-2--------Aldrin 7.1 U

1024-57-3-------Heptachlor epoxide 7.1 U

9S9-98-B------~-Endosulfan I

7.1 U

60-S7-1---------Dieldrin 14 U

,N I 72-SS-9---------4,4'-DDE 20 {

72-20-8---------Endrin 14

33213-65-9------Endosulfan II 26 .--P' If'

72-54-8---------4,4'-DDD 14 U

1031-07-8-------Endosulfan sulfate 14 U

SO-29-3---------4,4'-DDT .L":t ""C"" 1- -

72-43-5---------Methoxychlor 71 U

S3494-70-5------Endrin ketone 14 U

7421-93-4-------Endrin aldehyae- 14 U

5103-71-9-------alpha-Chlordane

.... ~ .... -~ ... l

5103-74-2-------gamrna-Chlordane 7.1 U l

BOOl-35-2-------Toxaphene 710 U •

\

12674-11-2------Aroclor-1016 140 U I

11104-28-2------Aroclor-1221 280 U 1

11141-16-S------Aroclor-1232 140 U

\

53469-21-9------Aroclor-1242 140 U

12672-29-6------Aroclor-1248 140 U

11097-69-1------Aroclor-1254 140 U

~

11096-82-5------Aroclor-1260 350 'V

r..

FORM I PEST

p. (b't

TIERRA-A-017990
r-~:.v-~ ---

AUG 2 7 1997

SOUTHWES1I" I,.ABORA TORY OF OKLAHOl\L<\

1700 West Alb~~ ..§uite A / Broken Arrow. OK 74012

·918-251-2858

~2.:2 NARRATIVE

AA.uguSl 13. ] 997

CO~'TRACT NO.: 68-D5-0026 '

CASE NO.: 25601

SAMPLE NOS.: BSE22. BSE2"1, js-r

BSE28MSD. SS£3J

BSE43RE. BSE29. F

BSE36, BSE)6RE. }

:~ :-'.:' - .;;'I~5D.E~-:::2C:·.BSE27. BSE28. BSE28MS,

.-.':. B::::::::-P_~ BSE39. BSE4L BSE43.

.- . ~':'~.BSE35 ..BSE35RE ..

SDGNO.: BSE22

----------

VOLA TILE FRACTION

Founeen soil samples and six water samples \\.

were analyzed by GCIMS follo\\ing the OLMO'

'.:.5. The samples

Alternate columns used for the analysis ofvol:l'

(bonded ;%phenyl-95% dimethyl polysiJoxanc

and the DB624, 75m, 0.53mmID MegabOre, 3l

, '~:: :.;. . . ~':T1-5

:.:53)

An alternate trap used for the analysis of\'olati

(Carbopack B/Carboxen 1000 & lOOt; 'TekmaI

The following samples inthis SDG (labeled v.~

performed to verify internal standard areas: E:

• wa~

No major problems occurred during the analys,

Blanks: VBLK6 contained low level XyleileO·.:-:;,:.:' ::::: ~" .:.~::~ ,..

Tentatively Identified CompoWlds (TIC's) at e' ~ I

VHBLKI contained low level Methylene ChIo

Surrogates: Sample BSE36 contained one sur'

contained all surrogates \\ithin limits. but boll

Area Recover)" Limits requiring both analyses

standard areas outside QC Area Recovef\' Lim

but also contained one surrogate out. ~th an.

Matrix Spikes: No problems.

Internal Standards: Samples BSE38. BSE43 .... c -

areas outside QC Area Recover .. Limits. Tne\' .:. ..:~ :1'~'

\'t:rifying a matrix effect. Both "analyses ~e·l··:;: s<.; .. ._....

standard areas outside QC Area Recovert'1.'tn: !5. it me.J :. ~;:.~::Sj.;

duplication and verification of mauix eifltt

~.ilr~~ulti

.', ned internal

." ·.~I. .. .:(BSE2SMS) for

TIERRA-A-017991
NOTE: All manual integrations in this data package for GC/MS Volatiles have been perfonned for one of

the following reasons:

a. Data system missed peak during acquisition.

b. Data system improperly integrated peak.

If water samples are contained in this case, their pH data is included on the page accom'p~~~g th!s ~DG

narrative.

Icertify that this data package is in compliance with the tenDS and conditions of the contract. both

technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data

contained inthis hardcopy data package and in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette

has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager, or his designee. as verified by the following signature.

~~t"~

HanyM. Borg

Organic Program Manager

August 13, 1997

TIERRA-A-017992
SOUTHWEST LABORATORY OF OKLAHOMA

1700 West Albao)', Suite A I Broken Arrow, OK 74012

918-251-2858

SDG NARRATIVE

August 13, 1997

CONTRACT NO.: 68-D5-0026

CASE NO.: 25601

SAMPLE NOS.: BSE22, BSE23, BSE23MS, BSE23MSD, BSE26, BSE27. BSE28,

BSE28DL, BSE28MS, BSE28MSD, BSE29, BSE30, BSE30DL,

BSE31, BSE32, BSE33, BSE33DL, BSE34, BSE35, BSE36,

BSE36DL, BSE37, BSE37DL, B8E38, BSE41, BSE42, BSE43,

BSE43DL, BSE44

SDG NO.: BSE22

SEMIVOLATILE FRACTION

Fourteen soil and five water samples were submitted for Semivolatile Organic Analyses.

The saIJ1pleswere analyzed by GelMS following the OLM03.2 CLP Organic Statement

of Work.

The following column is used for the semivolatile analysis: Restek XTI-5 (bonded 5%

phenyl-95% dimethyl polysiloxane), 30m, 0.25mm ID, 0.25wn film thickness (Restek

#12223).

The following samples in this SDG (labeled with a DL) are considered billable since

these samples were diluted to bring target analytes within linear range. BSE28DL.

BSE30DL, BSE33DL,BSE36DL,BSE37DL,BSE43DL

No major problems occurred during the analyses of these samples. Sample coolers

arrived at 14, 15, 19, 20 and 21 degrees Celsius. The following samples had secondary

dilutions analyzed for target compounds above linear range: BSE28, BSE30, BSE33,

BSE36, BSE37, BSE43.

The following samples had alkanes reported and the reports are included at the end of this

SDO Narrative: BSE22, BSE23, 8SE26, BSE27, BSE28. BSE28DL, BSE29. BSE30,

BSE30DL. BSE3l, 8SE32, BSE33, BSE33DL, BSE34. BSE35, BSE36. BSE37,

BSE37DL, 8SE38, BSE41, BSE42, B5E43, BSE43DL, BSE44, SBLK!, SBLK2,SBKL3

Blanks: SBLIG had low level phthalate contamination below CRQL. SBLK4 had low

level phthalate contaminatio~ above CRQL but below 5X CRQL..

TIERRA-A-017993
Surrogates: BSE26, BSE22, BSE23, BSE23MS, and BSE23MSD had low recovery of

Terphenyl.d14 at 25%, 2~%, 26%, 22%. and 30%, respectively. BSE23MS had low

recovery of2-fluorobiphenyl at 39%.

Matrix Spikes: BSE23MS had low recovery of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at 36% and high

recovery of 4-nitrophenol at 100%. BSE23MSD"lrad low recovery ofN-nitroso-di-npropyl amine at 32%. BSE23MSIMSD had high RPDs for 4-chloro-3-methylphenol at

46%, 4-nitrophenol at 63%, and 2,4-dinitrotoluene at 40% .

....

Internal Standards: BSE23MS and BSE23MSD had low recovery ofintemal standard

areas.

NOTE: All manual integrations in this data package for GefMS Volatiles/Semivolatiles

have been performed for one of the following reasons:

a. Data system missed peak during acquisition.

b. Data system improperly integrated peak.

If water samples are contained in this case, their pH data is included on the page

accompanying this SDG narrative.

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the

contract, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed

above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computerreadable data submitted on floppy diskette has been authorized by the Laboratory

Manager, or his designee, as verified by the following signature.

Harry M. Borg

!J/L-tv-/1n -#rj'

Organic Program Manager

hb

August 13, 1997

TIERRA-A-017994
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

SDG Narrative

Fraction:

25601

B5E22

68-D5-0026

B5E22, B5E23, B5E26, B5E27, B5E28, B5E31, B5E37, B5E38, B5E41, B5E43,

B5E29, B5E30, B5E32, B5E33, BSE34, BSE35, B5E36, BSE42, BSE44.

PesticidelPCB

Case:

SDG:

Contract:

Samples:

i"

5DG BSE22 consisted of 14 soil samples and 5 water samples plus dilutions and re-extracts

which were analyzed for pesticidelPCBs. All samples, blanks and spikes were extracted and

analyzed according to EPA SOW OLM03.2. The samples were analyzed on J&W Scientific dual

analytical columns (30m x 0.32mm 1D, 0.25J.Lmfilm thickness, DB-17 or DB-17MS and DB1701 or DB-XLB). The DB-17 phase consists of (50%-Phenyl) Methylpolysiloxane and the DB1701 phase consists of (l4%-Cyanopropylphenyl) Methylpolysiloxane. The DB-XLB is a

proprietary phase pesticide column. These columns were specifically designed for

pesticidelPCB separation as required by the EPA's SOW. All applicable manufacturer's

instructions were followed for the analysis of pesticideslPCBs. Manufacturer provided

information concerning the performance characteristics of the column are kept on site.

Hydrogen was used as the carrier gas for instruments HP-7 and HP-I5. Helium was used as the

carrier gas for all other instruments. Three major problems occurred during the analysis of

samples in this case. They are described in the following paragraphs.

Surrogate recoveries of all method blanks were within control limits. Percent recoveries for the

water MSIMSD were within control limits. The soil MSIMSD exhibited erratic recoveries due to

matrix effect.

It should be noted that when multi-responding compounds are present in a sample, false positives

of single response compounds are common. The number of false positives may be reduced by

employing a ratio technique in samples which are "clean", containing minimally more peaks

than the multi-responder of interest, and do not contain environmentally altered multiresponders. However, "real-life" samples are typically not as previously described. Many times

they exhibit highly complex chromatograms and environmentally altered multi-responders which

are unable to be ratioed with a great deal of accuracy. Since ECD detection is not a definitive

means of detection, single-response analytes in the presence of mUlti-responders will be

reported (as per the method, if a peak is within a target analyte's retention time window on both

columns, then it is reported as that target analyte). This alleviates the possibility that false

negative results will be reported. However, this may lead to false positives. The end datI>.user

should be aware of the lim itations of the method and take appropriate care.

1700 W. Albany Broken Arrow, OK. 74012-1421 (918)251·2858

TIERRA-A-017995
Southwe~JLaboratory of Oklahoma

'I

~'

,

All soil samples in this SOG caused ex:Femely high breakdown of 4,4'-ODT, methoxychlor, and

several other pesticides in the continui~g standards following their injection. The continuing

standards analyzed before these sampl~ met OLM03.2 continuing calibration criteria. When

diluted lOX (in order tp achieve satis$ctqry chromatography as per O-S9/PEST, 10.2.3.1), the

samples met OLMOJ:-2--acceptance crit~ria except for 4,4' -DOT on the DB-17 column (samples

affected the calibration verification t&#"'lesser degree because of dilution, but affected them

nonetheless). An undiluted analysis amC a lOX analysis was performed for these samples.

Forms for the undiluted and the 1OX~~. have been submitted.

All samples in this SOO, as noted abov(!:i,required dilution. This was performed per D-59/PEST,

10.2.3.1, which states that all samples rnlust be analyzed at the most concentrated level that is

consistent with achieving satisfactory chttomatography. These sampl~s were diluted in order to

allow for the continuing calibration to b~(.,compliant. Therefore, the dilutions are billable.

The original extracts of soil samples BS~7, BSE28, BSE3l, BSE3 7, BSE38, and BSE43 and

their accompanying method blanks and MtSIMSDs exhibited Aroclor 1254 contamination. This

contamination was traced to another cIierft!"s sample. This sample was shipped to the lab for

OLM03.2 analysis with no warning that it::may contain high levels of target analyte. In fact, this

sample was pure Aroclor 1254. Since plWe PCBs are "sticky", normal glassware washing

procedures were not adequate, and thusthl$ contamination. For this reason, the samples and

MSIMSDs were re-extracted (OUtSidehoJ6 time). The re-extracts are reported on forms for the

undiluted and lOX analyses and tli-eorigi~1 extracts accompany the data package in the extra

data section. The high-level Aroclor conUflmination also contributed to the lateness of this case.

Upon final review of the re-extracted samJ9!es, it was noted that one column on instrument HP-7

was not resolved (endosulfan sulfate and ~('thoxychlor). Due to the unusually dirty nature of the

samples, they were not re-analyzed. The f.·vrmsgeneration software did not work properly for

the resolution check and PEMs for instrum:ent HP-7. The data integrator was not able to separate

endosulfan sulfate and methoxychlor whie~·hkept the form from printing properly. The PEMs

would not print properly because the samp·le caused high breakdown and the 4,4'-DDT and

methoxychlor peaks were no longer presel¥t to calculate a resolution.

The following tables list the total nanogrlfllS injected on column for each calibration standard

based upon amount injected on column, 9l;~J.LL, IJ.LL. or 2JlL:

RESOLUTION CHECK

Compounds Total ~ograms Total nanograms Total nanograms

(O.-5J1Lj (If.1l) (2f.1l)

gamma-Chlordane 0_005 0.01 0.02

Endosulfan I i0:00$ I 0.01 110.02

._.

4,4'-DDE 1o.or 0.02 0.04

Dieldrin 10.0t: ~2

10,04

Endosulfan Sulfate 1 0.01 0.02 10.04

Endrin Ketone 1°' 0

(

..j ~:~2 1

0

.

04

Methoxychlor 0.5:: 0.2

Tetrachloro-m-xylene J 0.01 I ~'~: I ~'~~

Decachlorobiphenyl J 0.01.. I U.U:l I U.U4

1700 W. Albany BrokcffJ Arrow, OK. 74012-1421

('.[70

(918}251-28S8

(-

TIERRA-A-017996
Southwest Laborator)' of Oklahoma

PERFORMANCE EV ALUA TION ICompounds Total nanograms Total nanograms I; Total nanograms

I O'amma-BHC

(0.5IlL) (l~) I (2~)

0.005 0.01 0.02

r;l~h~-BHC 0.005 fIb1 0.02

0.05 .02

4. 4'-DDT 0.1

I b~~-BHC 0.005 .] 0.01 0.02

Endrin 0.025 0.05 0.1

Methoxych lor 0.125 0.25 0.5

Tetrachloro-m·xylene 0.01 ~O.?~ 0.04

I Decachlorobiphenyl j 0.01 J 0.02 0.04

rt..'DIVIDUAL STANDARD MIXTUFf= A -- LOW

I

Compounds I Total nanograms Ii Total Dano~s ... .\ Total ,~an.. ogram.s .. I

I· . - 10 5uL\ I(Jl!L) -- (2l!L) - - .. - - .

'\. - ~-... - , ..

alpha-BHC 0.0025 0.005 0.01 ,

Heptachlor 0.0025 0.005 0.01

!eamma-BHC 0.0025 0.005 0.01

I~~:I~:~~fan I

0.0025 0.005 0.01

10.005 10.01 0.02

I E~dri~· 1 0.005 10.01

-_.

10.02

14,4'-DDD 10.005 I 0.01 10.

02

14,4'-DDT 0.005 0.01 10.02

I Methoxychlor 0.025 0.05 0.1

I Tetrachloro-m-xylene [0.0025 J 0.005 I ~'~: I Decachlorobiphenyl U J 0.005 j 0.01 I U.UL

I1',jDIVIDUAL STAND,A.RD MIXTUFF B·- LOW -- .

I Compounds I Total nanograms Total nanograms Total nanograms

I beta-BHC

(O.SIlL) (l!J.L) (2J.1L)

I 0.0025 0.005 0.01

delta-BHe I 0.0025 0.005 0.01 IAldrin 1 0.0025 0.005 0.01 I Heptachlor epoxide 0.0025 0.005 0.01

1 0.0025 0.005 0.01 t alpha-Chlordane 1 0.0025 0.005 0.01 2amma-Chlordane

14,4'-DDE 1 0.005 ]oM- 0.02

Endosulfan sulfate 10.005 0.01

1

0

.

02

Endrin aldehyde 10.005 0.01 0.02

IEndrin ketone fQ005 J 0.01 I~'~:

Endosulfan II 1 0.005 ] 0.01 1 U.U:l

Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.0025 0.005 0.01

1700 W. Albany Broken Arrow, OK. 74012-1421

~' t1ft

(918)251-2858

TIERRA-A-017997
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

IDecachlorobiphenyl 10.005 I 0.01

INDIVIDUAL STANDARD MIXTURE A -- MEDIUM

Compounds Total nanograms Total nanograms Total nanograms

(O.5f.1L) (l J,LL) (2J,LL)

alpha-BHC 0.01 0.02 0.04

Heptachlor 0.01 0.02 0.04

gamma-BHC 0.01 0.02 0.04

Endosulfan I 0.01 0.02 0.04

Dieldrin 0.02 0.04 0.08

Endrin 0.02 0.04 0.08

4,4'-00D 0.02 0.04 0.08

4,4'-DDT 0.02 ·0.04 0.08

Methoxychlor 0.1 0.2 0.4

Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.01 0.02 0.04

Decachlorobiphenyl 0.02 0.04 0.08

INDIVIDUAL STANDARD MIXTURE B - MEDIUM

Compounds Total nanograms Total nanograms Total nanograms

(O.5f.1L) (1J,LL) .. (2J,LL).

beta-BHC 0.01 0.02 0.04

delta-BHC 0.01 0.02 0.04

Aldrin 0.01 0.02 0.04

Heptachlor epoxide 0.01 0.02 0.04

alpha-Chlordane 0.01 0.02 0.04

gamma-Chlordane 0.01 0.02 0.04

4,4'-00E 0.02 0.04 0.08

Endosulfan sulfate 0.02 0.04 0.08

Endrin aldehyde 0.02 0.04 0.08

Endrin ketone 0.02 0.04 0.08

Endosulfan II 0.02 0.04 0.08

Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.01 0.02 0.04

Decachlorobiphenyl 0.02 0.04 0.08

INDIVIDUAL STANDARD MIXTURE A -- I-llGH

Compounds Total nanograms Total nanograms Total nanograms

(O.SIJ.L) (lIJ.L) (21J.L)

alpha-BHC 0.04 0.08 0.16

Heptachlor 0.04 0.08 0.16

gamma-BHC 0.04 0.08 0.16

Endosulfan I 0.04 0.08 0.16

Dieldrin 0.08 0.16 0.32

Endrin 0.08 0.16 0.32

1700 W. Albany Broken Arrow, OK. 74012-1421

p.rtz

(918)25] -2858

TIERRA-A-017998
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

4,4'-DDD

4,4'-DDT

10.08

10.08

Methoxychlor

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

=10.4

10.04

.... ThJmVTnl JAL '_ .... - - STANDARD MIXTIJRE B .- HIGH I Compounds I Total nanograms Total nanograms Total nanograms

(O.SIlL) (1,..L) (2~)

I hf'!ta.BHC 10.04 0.08 0.16

I ;i:lta-BHC 10.04 0.08 0.16

I ~ldrin -- 10.04 0.08 0.16

IHeptachlor epoxide 10.04 0.08 10.16

alpha-Chlordane 10.04 0.08 I 0.16

gamma-Chlordane 10.04 - 0.08 0.16

14.4'-DDE 10.08 I 0.16 032

I Endosulfan sulfate 10.08 10.16 0.32

I Endrin aldehyde 10.08 IQ16 0.32 .

I Endrin ketone 10.08 10.16 0.32

Endosulfan II 10.08 0.16 0.32

Tetrach1oro-m-xylene 10.04 0.08 0.16

I Decachlorobiphenyl ro.os.' .1 0.16 0.32

MULTI-RESPONSE STANDARD MIXTURES

Compounds I Total nanograms I Total nanograms I Total nanograms

(0.5~) (1~) (2~)

Arocior-1 0] 6 1

6

.

05

1

0

.

1 =:J0

.

2

- ,

Arocior-1221 0.1 0.2 0.4

Aroclor-1232 10.05 I 0.1 . I 0.2

Aroclor-1242 10.05 10.1 10.2

-- -

Aroc1or-1248 10.05 10.1 10.2

Aroc1or-1254 } 0.05 10.1 1

0.2

Aroc1or-1260 0.05 1 0.1 0.2

Toxaphene 10.25 I 0.5 I 1.0

All manual integrations in this data package for GCIEC have been perfonned for one of the

following reasons:

a. Data system missed a peak during processing.

b. Data system improperly integrated a peak.

Icertify that this data package is in compliance with the tenns and conditions of the contract,

both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of

the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer-readable data submitted on

1700 W. Albany Broken Arrow, OK. 74012-1421 (918)251-2858

TIERRA-A-017999
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

diskette has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified by the

following signature.

Brett~Dees

GC Laboratory Supervisor

August 26, 1997

,.....

1700 W. Albany Broken Arrow, OK. 74012-1421

p.' :Ji(

(918)251-2858

qA

TIERRA-A-018000