alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1  CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  I, Eric S. Sprott, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Sprott Physical Silver Trust (the Trust);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Trusts other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Trust and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Trust, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles:  c)evaluated the effectiveness of the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)disclosed in this report any change in the Trusts internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trusts internal control over financial reporting.  5. The Trusts other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Trusts auditors and the audit committee of the Trusts board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Trusts ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Trusts internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 28, 2013  /s/   ERIC S. SPROTTEric   S. SprottPrincipal   Executive Officer
May 9, 1962

Reap. Dec. 10243.

#### Borneo Sumatra Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R60/17983.

Reappraisement dismissed March 16,1962. Entered at Houston, Tex. (Not published.) Motion by plaintiff.
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ARGENTINA S.A.

We hereby consent
to the use of our name in the annual report on Form 20-F of Adecoagro S.A. and any amendments thereto (the Annual Report) and the references to and information contained in the Cushman & Wakefield Argentina S.A. Appraisal of
Real Property report dated September 30, 2012 prepared for Adecoagro S.A., wherever appearing in the Annual Report, including but not limited to our company under the heading Information on the Company in the Annual Report.

Dated: April 26, 2013



Cushman & Wakefield Argentina S.A.By:

LOGOName:

Julio C. SperoniTitle:

Valuation Manager
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

s0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

139890

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139890 COA: 293056 Wayne CC: 04-012890 THELONIOUS SEARCY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield 

Section 

Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact 

Report/Environmental 

Impact Statement 

Appendix 3.11-A 

Safety and Security Data 

November 2017 
Appendix 3.11-A 

Safety and Security Data 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank 
Appendix 3.11-A 

Safety and Security Data 

California High-Speed Rail Authority November 2017 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Page | 3.11-A-1 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

APPENDIX 3.11-A: SAFETY AND SECURITY DATA 

A number of technical appendices included as part of the Fresno to Bakersfield Section Final 

Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) have not been 

recreated for the purposes of this Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS because the information contained 

within the technical appendix would remain applicable to the F-B LGA. Appendix 3.11-A did not 

require an update for the F-B LGA analysis and therefore is not included in Volume II of the 

Fresno to Bakersfield Section Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS. To review the appendix in its entirety, 

please refer to the Authority’s Final EIR/EIS: Fresno to Bakersfield website. 
Appendix 3.11-A 

Safety and Security Data 

November 2017 California High-Speed Rail Authority 

3.11-A-2 | Page Fresno to Bakersfield Section 

Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS 

This page intentionally left blank
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:   (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/   Roy T. K. Thung
Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: May 11, 2009   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.    1
##### 








---



##### 



Introduction
    Eligibility Requirements
    1




---



##### 



Initial Enrollment
  Description of Premium Reimbursement Benefits
  Example: Employee 1 retires in 2007 at age 65 with 20 years of service, qualifying to participate
in the Plan. Employee 1 is responsible for obtaining individual medical insurance coverage and is
eligible for a maximum reimbursement amount of $53.28 per month for coverage purchased in 2007. In
2008, Employee 1s maximum reimbursement amount is increased 3% to $54.88. Employee 2 retires in
2008 at age 65 with 20 years of service, qualifying to participate in the Plan. If the premium for
the base Medicare supplemental coverage plan in 2008 is $95, the maximum reimbursement amount in
2008 for employees who retire in 2008 would be $68.40 per month (72% of $95). The reason for the
difference in the maximum reimbursement amounts for Employee 1 and Employee 2 in 2008 is that
Employee 1s maximum reimbursement amount is determined based on the maximum in the year Employee 1
retired and is increased 3% per year after that.
  2




---



##### 



For
example, if the maximum monthly reimbursement amount established by the Company is $55 and the
Participant purchases coverage that costs $35 per month, the Plan will reimburse the Participant
$35 per month.
  Claiming Reimbursement
  Termination of Participation
  1)
    
    the date the Participant dies;2)
    
    the date the Participant begins to work in full-time employment
(as determined by the Company) after retirement from the Company;
 Amendment or Termination of Plan
  Claim Procedures
  3




---



##### 



Discretionary Authority
  Statement of Rights
  Receive Information About Your Plan and Benefits
   4




---



##### 



Prudent Actions by Plan Fiduciaries
  Enforce Your Rights
   Assistance With Your Questions
   Plan Name
  5




---



##### 



Plan Number
  Employer
 
 Employer Identification Number
  Type of Plan
  Plan Administrator
 
 Type of Administration
  Agent for Service of Legal Process
 
 Contributions/Funding
  Plan Year
  6




---



##### 



Transcat Inc.By:DateSignature of Participant
    
    
    
    DatePrint Name of Participant
 7
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sky-mobi Limited (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl Yeung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 28, 2013



|    |  |                |  |                        
|--- |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Carl Yeung
|    |  |               
|    |  | Name:          |  | Carl Yeung             
|    |  | Title:         |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v STUART C. HARNISH, Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

12 USCMA 443, 31 CMR 29

No. 14,888

July 21, 1961

*Lieutenant Colonel Remmel H. Dudley,*USMC, argued the cause for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Commander Raymond O. Kellam,*USN, argued the cause for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Robebt E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The court was improperly constituted. The findings of guilty are set aside. The Charge and its specifications are ordered dismissed.

Ferguson, Judge

(concurring):

I concur.

While I agree fully with the Chief Judge that the court-martial which tried accused’s case was improperly constituted, I prefer more fully to set out the circumstances involved.

The charges against the accused were originally referred to a special court-martial whose membership included Peter and Tall entire. Subsequently, the charges were withdrawn from that court-martial and referred to trial before another special court-martial. Although Peter and Tallentire had not been appointed to this panel, they were present and participated in the hearing of accused’s case.

*444It is clear that Peter and Tallentire were never appointed to the court-martial before which accused’s case was tried. Thus, they were mere interlopers, and the proceedings are a nullity. United States v Machlin, 59 BR 343; United States v Steward, 11 BR 385; United States v Goggan, 49 BR 289. Our decision in United States v Padilla, 1 USCMA 603, 5 CMR 31, is clearly distinguishable. In that case, it was established that the convening authority intended to, and did appoint two new members to the panel which tried the accused. By reason of a clerical error, it appeared that they were placed on another court “as amended” by the orders appointing the actual trial body. We held that such a mistake did not invalidate the appointing orders. Here, no such error occurred, and the best that the Government has been able to demonstrate is that the convening authority subjectively intended to place Peter and Tallentire on the court which tried accused but took no action to accomplish his aim. The latter, of course, is the *sine qua non*of military court membership. United States v Padilla, supra; Givens v Zerbst, 255 US 11, 65 L ed 475, 41 S Ct 227 (1921).

Accordingly, I agree with the Chief Judge that the proceedings against accused are a nullity. The egregious nature of the error argues against subjecting him again to the harassment of another trial. I, therefore, join in dismissing the Charge and its specifications.
#### Edwin J. Deming *et al.,*Resp’ts, *v.*Bradhurst Schieffelin, App’lt.

Appeal from order of the city court, denying motion to vacate warrant of arrest.

*Ordered,*that the order he affirmed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 

          - [CBP Dec. 07-17] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of re-approval of Saybolt LP of Carson, California, as a commercial gauger and laboratory. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 151.13, Saybolt LP, 21730 South Wilmington Avenue, Carson, California 90810, has been re-approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils, and to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analysis or gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific tests or gauger services this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *http://www.cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​org_​and_​operations.xml.*

# DATES:

The re-approval of Saybolt LP as a commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 14, 2006. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Eugene J. Bondoc, Ph.D, or Randall Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060. 

Dated: April 6, 2007. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E7-6900 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# One giant leap for mankind -- one small step for a man

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  One giant leap for mankind -- one small step for a man 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Discusses the developing events taking rockets, satellites, and man into space. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Apollo 11 (Spacecraft) 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 51 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  030066314.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2007211EN.01002101.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus, Finland lodged on 29 June 2007 — Aberdeen Property Fininvest Alpha Oy

(Case C-303/07)

(2007/C 211/39)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus, Finland

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Aberdeen Property Fininvest Alpha Oy

Applicant:

Other parties: Uudenmaan verovirasto and Helsingin kaupunki

Other parties:

Question referred

Are Articles 43 EC and 48 EC and Articles 56 EC and 58 EC to be interpreted as meaning that, in order to safeguard the fundamental freedoms set out therein, an osakeyhtiö (company limited by shares) or sijoitusrahasto (investment fund) constituted under Finnish law and a SICAV constituted under Luxembourg law are to be regarded as comparable despite the fact that a form of company corresponding exactly to a SICAV is not recognised in Finnish legislation, having regard, first, to the fact that a SICAV, which is a company under Luxembourg law, is not mentioned in the list of companies referred to in Article 2(a) of Directive 90/435/EEC (1), with which the Finnish withholding tax legislation applicable in the present case is consistent, and, second, to the fact that a SICAV is exempt from income tax under domestic Luxembourg tax legislation? Is it therefore contrary to the above articles of the EC Treaty for a SICAV resident in Luxembourg which is the recipient of a dividend not to be exempt from withholding tax charged in Finland on dividends?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member Sates, OJ L 225, 20.8.1990. p. 6.

1

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Find yourself with a map

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Find yourself with a map 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Federal Depository Library Program 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Federal Depository Library Program 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  172 × 57 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  60377278.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -