alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7862** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JOSHUA STRADER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:08

- cr - 01152

- DCN

- 1; 2:11

- cv - 70081

- DCN )

Submitted : March 27 , 2014 Decided: April 1, 2014

Before MOTZ , Circuit Judge , and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Joshua Strader, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew J. Modica, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joshua Stra der seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable j urists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on proce dural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the re cord and conclude that Strader has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the material s before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Trinity. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Daniel R. Bartholomew |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel      R. Bartholomew     |
| Chief      Financial Officer   |
| May      10, 2010              |

----
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

SONTAY T. SMOTHERMAN, 

 

 Petitioner, Civ. No. 2:14-cv-972 

 Crim. No. 2:12-cr-055(3) 

 v. Judge Frost 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Respondent. 

ORDER 

 This action under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was dismissed on May 6, 2015 on the basis that the 

claims presented in Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, ECF No. 270, had been presented to and 

rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Petitioner’s direct appeal. 

Order, ECF No. 291. See United States v. Smotherman, 564 Fed.Appx. 209 (6th Cir. 2014); see 

also Smotherman v.United States, 134 S.Ct. 2863 (2014). Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal 

from that dismissal. Notice of Appeal, ECF No. 318. This matter is now before the Court on 

petitioner’s Motion for Stay the Effect of a Notice of Appeal, ECF No. 319 (“Petitioner’s 

Motion”). 

Petitioner’s Motion asks that “the effect of a notice of appeal” be stayed “until the 

disposition of the post-conviction motion for DNA testing pursuant to 18 USC 3600.” Id. 

Although it is not entirely clear what petitioner intends by this motion, the Court notes that 

petitioner’s request for DNA testing was denied on June 11, 2015. Order, ECF No. 317. 

 Accordingly, Motion for Stay the Effect of a Notice of Appeal, ECF No. 319, is DENIED.

 /s/ GREGORY L. FROST 

 GREGORY L. FROST 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cr-00055-GLF-TPK Doc #: 322 Filed: 06/18/15 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                                      |  |                                       |     |     
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | --- | ----
|Name of entity and place of jurisdiction              |  | Voting Securities    Owned Percentage |    
|PennantPark Floating Rate Funding I, LLC (Delaware)   |  |                                       | 100 | %   
|PFLT Funding II, LLC (Delaware)                       |  |                                       | 100 | %   
|GMC Television Broadcasting Holdings, Inc. (Delaware) |  |                                       | 100 | %(1)
|GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC (Delaware)           |  |                                       | 100 | %(1)
|Solutions Capital G.P., LLC (Delaware)                |  |                                       | 100 | %   
|Solutions Capital I, L.P. (Delaware)                  |  |                                       | 100 | %   
|RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC                          |  |                                       | 100 | %   



|(1) | The entity is directly owned by PFLT Funding II, LLC, which is wholly-owned by us.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Chief Financial Officer Certification**

 

I, Daniel R. Bartholomew, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Trinity Capital Corporation;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)             Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)            Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)             Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting, and;

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)            Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 
| Date: April 30, 2004 | /s/ DANIEL R. BARTHOLOMEW |   |
|----------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                 | Daniel R. Bartholomew     |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

1

----
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# We the people remember! National POW MIA Recognition Day, September 18, 1987

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  We the people remember! National POW MIA Recognition Day, September 18, 1987 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Veterans Administration 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Veterans Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  140 × 27 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018311530.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Health In Harmony Inc., for the year ending October 31, 2011, I, Tammy DuPerron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

1.    Such yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending October 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    The information contained in such yearly report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Health In Harmony Inc.

 

 

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |
| Date: October 12, 2012                         |
|                                      |
| */s/ Tammy DuPerron*                           |
| Tammy DuPerron

*Chief Financial Officer* |
Exhibit 10.6


 


June 2, 2008


 


Mr. Kenneth J. Swanson

c/o Pliant Corporation

1475 Woodfield Road

Schaumburg, Illinois 60173


 


Dear Ken:


 


This letter revises and
supersedes as of January 1, 2008, the severance benefit provisions in the
Company’s letter to you of August 17, 2004, in light of the tax
regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.


 


You are eligible for one
year of salary continuance (payable over the 12-month period beginning with
your separation from service) and outplacement support in the event your
employment is involuntarily terminated, except if you are terminated for cause
(as determined exclusively by the Company’s Board of Directors).   In the event that upon your separation you
are a “specified employee” of a “public company” (as those terms are defined in
those regulations) and the total salary continuance exceeds the maximum
involuntary separation pay amount (currently $460,000) permitted by the Section 409A
regulations, the excess will be paid no earlier than the date that is six
months after your separation from service. 
The foregoing is not, however, intended to modify your status of an “at
will” employee of the Company.


 


If you agree that this
correctly restates the terms of your severance benefit, please sign one copy of
this letter below and return the signed copy to me.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Pliant Corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   /s/ Harold C. Bevis

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Harold C. Bevis

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  President and Chief
  Executive Officer

  



 


Agreed:


 


	
   /s/ Kenneth J. Swanson

  	
   

  
	
  Kenneth J. Swanson
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Sept. 30, 2011 of VB Clothing, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Anthony PasqualeAnthony PasqualeChief Executive Officer/s/ Anthony PasqualeAnthony PasqualeChief Financial OfficerDated: March 2, 2011   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to VB Clothing, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Action brought on 15 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-141/06)

(2006/C 121/10)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Aresu and J.R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for the transposition of Directive 2002/65/EC into national law expired on 9 October 2004.

----

(1)  OJ L 271, p. 16

(2)  OJ L 330, p. 50

(3)  OJ L 144, p. 19

(4)  OJ L 166, p. 51

----
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-4551 Directorate Identifier: 16-NE-07-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Removal and 

installation of pawl 

carrier pivot pins

3.0 $ 255.00 $ 255.00 4 $1,020.00

Pawl Carrier Pivot 

Pins $ 0.00 $860 $ 860.00 4 $3,440.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $4,460

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# U.S. Air Force art collection

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  U.S. Air Force art collection 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Air ForceUnited States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1970-1980 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  U.S. Air Force fine arts series ; set 2 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  1244 × 59 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  12 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  index.cpd 

Part of: U.S. Air Force art collection (10 objects)     Next

U.S. Air Force art collection

U.S. Air Force art collection

U.S. Air Force art collection

U.S. Air Force art collection

U.S. Air Force art collection

U.S. Air Force art collection

U.S. Air Force art collection

U.S. Air Force art collection

U.S. Air Force art collection

U.S. Air Force art collection

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report of Hazlo! Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yung Kong Chin, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated:  November 15, 2011  /s/ Yung Kong Chin Yung Kong Chin Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer