alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2011 of TrackSoft Systems, Inc., a Wyoming corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Matthew Howell, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: November 28, 2011





/s/ Matthew Howell


Matthew Howell


President and Director


Principal Executive Officer


Principal Financial Officer


Principal Accounting Officer
Case: 2:11-cv-01019-EAS-TPK Doc #: 58 Filed: 01/31/14 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T12:54:45-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### Aris Gloves, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7382.

Invoice dated Yeovil, England, April 10, 1946.

Certified April 11, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 24, 1946.

Entry No. 763003.

(Decided September 17, 1947)

*Mary Behan*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v THOMAS M. MARSHALL, Airman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant

14 USCMA 619, 34 CMR 399

No. 17,738

June 19, 1964

*Captain Charles Timblin,*USN, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Harvey M, Jame,*USNR, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

Convicted of absence without leave, larceny, and worthless check offenses, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Articles 86,121, and 128a, 10 USC §§ 886, 921, 923a, respectively, the accused was sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of $50.00 per month for two months, confinement at hard labor for two months, and reduction. The convening authority set aside the findings of guilty of larceny and approved the sentence, suspending the bad-conduct discharge. Other appellate authorities have affirmed. Before us, the accused contends that specifications 3 and 4, Charge II, are fatally defective in that they combine allegations of an intent to deceive with the purpose of procuring lawful currency in purporting to charge violations of Code, supra, Article 123a. See United States v Wade, 14 USCMA 507, 34 CMR 287. The Government acknowledges that the specifications in question do not allege offenses, and prays that this Court set aside the findings of guilty with respect thereto, returning the record of trial to the board of review for reassessment of the sentence. Our separate examination of the counts indicates that the *Wade*decision is, indeed, dispositive.

The petition for review is granted. The findings of guilty of specifications 3 and 4, Charge II, are set aside. The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The board may reassess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty.
Case: 2:11-cv-01076-EAS-MRA Doc #: 20 Filed: 11/29/12 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01076-EAS-MRA Doc #: 20 Filed: 11/29/12 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T09:19:01-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 54818.

#### W. A. Taylor & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 150235-K/13045 (New Orleans).

*308Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated tha,t the issues and fasts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Washington State Liquor Control Board*(34 C. C. P. A. 118, C. A. D. 352) and that the merchandise contained in cases 6 and 760, reported by the inspector as manifested and landed empty, was not in fact imported. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that the portions of the merchandise reported by the inspector as manifested and landed empty are subject to an allowance in duties and internal revenue tax. The protest was sustained to this extent.
No. 51108.

#### Protests 90049-K, etc., of Mottahedeh & Sons et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 8796)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. v. United States

Entry No. 18294, etc.

*651(Decided May 10, 1957)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached'and made a part hereof, relate to certain bicycles exported from Germany and entered at the port of Los Angeles, Cálif.

The cases have been submitted on an agreed set of facts that show cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question, and that establish such statutory value to be the invoice unit values, less inland freight, less ocean freight, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7548.

Entry No. 730423, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, December 1, 1945, etc.

Certified December 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 28, 1945, etc.

(Decided February 20, 1948)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a par-t hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues herein are the same in all material respects as the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the value found by the appraiser, .less any amounts added on entry to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 71-28

#### Rory J. Sutton, 2LT, U. S. Army v United States; LTC George R. Davis, Commanding Officer, USASTRATCOM Southeast Asia Signal School # 1, APO San Franisco 96491; Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army; and Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense.

On consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Prohibition and for a Writ of Mandamus, filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that said Petition is addressed to contemplated administrative proceedings pursuant to Army Regulations 635-100, and that no court-martial charges are pending or contemplated, it is, by the Court, this 7th day of July 1971,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See, In re Taylor, 12 USCMA 427, 31 CMR 13 (1961).
#### D. Kelman *v.*United States

No. 7608.

Entry No. 35734.

— Invoice dated Trieste, Italy, May 15, 1936.

Certified May 18, 1936.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 10, 1936.

*272(Decided June 30, 1948)

*Strauss & Hedges (Eugene F. Blauvelt*of counsel); *Lane & Wallace, Brooks & Brooks, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn,*associate counsel, for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ekwall, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for tbe parties hereto:

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, that the instant appeal to reappraisement covers peeled tomatoes in tins which were exported from Italy; that the said merchandise and the issues involved in the instant appeal to reappraisement are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues involved in *United States*v. *Luigi Vitelli Elvea, Inc., et al.,*Reap. Dec. 5941; that the merchandise covered by the instant appeal to reappraisement was, at the time of exportation thereof, sold and freely offered for sale in Italy to all purchasers in the ordinary course of trade, packed ready for shipment in the usual wholesale quantities, in the principal markets of Italy for exportation to the United States, at the values at which said peeled tomatoes were entered.

It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in Reap. Dec. 5941 be incorporated herein and the affidavit of Charles M. Gruber, attached hereto, be received in evidence and the said appeal to reappraisement submitted on this stipulation.

The instant reappraisement appeal is abandoned as to all other merchandise other than the aforementioned peeled tomatoes.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe peeled tomatoes herein involved and tbat sucb values are tbe entered values.

Tbe appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to tbat extent tbe appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2007297EN.01003202.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/32

---

Order of the President of the Court of 29 August 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Malta

(Case C-136/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 297/53)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America 

-vsJason C. Hosmer

Case No. 2:12-cr-099 (1) 

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

 CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 

11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one (1) of the 

Information. After examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of 

the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that the defendant is 

competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that the guilty plea 

is knowingly and voluntary made and that the offenses charged are supported 

by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements 

of such offense. 

I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of guilty should 

be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty and sentenced 

accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be rejected and the 

defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty plea. 

The Defendant remains on bond pending sentencing. 

Date: May 17, 2012 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation 

within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved 

party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned 

United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B). 

Case: 2:12-cr-00099-JLG-NMK Doc #: 16 Filed: 05/18/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
AUDITORS CONSENT


 

 Exhibit 10(i)

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

To the Board of Directors of

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company

 



        We consent to the use in this Post Effective Amendment No. 20 to Registration Statement No. 2-75413 on Form N-4 of our
reports dated February 15, 2001 on the Variable Annuity Fund 4 and Flex Annuity IV (Qualified) Segments of the Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 1 and the Flex Annuity IV (Non-Qualified) Segment of the Massachusetts Mutual
Variable Annuity Separate Account 2, and of our report dated February 8, 2001 on Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the use of statutory
accounting practices which differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under
the heading “Experts” in such Statement of Additional Information.


 

DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP


 

Hartford, Connecticut

April 25, 2001
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the "Report") of FS
Energy and Power Fund (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, William Goebel, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to
the best of my knowledge, that:



/s/ WILLIAM GOEBELName:

William GoebelDate:

March 30, 2012


---



QuickLinks
Before the Second Division,

January 23, 1942

No. 46872.

#### Protests 980637-G, etc., of Edgar C. Hyman Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of (1) silk mufflers, not hemmed; (2) silk mufflers, hemmed, imported prior to the effective date of said trade agreement; (3) silk mufflers, valued at more than $5 per dozen, hemmed but not block-printed by hand; (4) woven silk mufflers, valued at more than $5 per dozen, hemmed, but not block-printed by hand; and (5) woven silk mufflers, valued at more than $5 per dozen, not hemmed or hemstitched, but block-printed by hand. In accordance therewith the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: Those in schedule A, at 60 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1209; schedule B, at 55 percent under paragraph 1209; schedule C, at 40 percent under paragraph 1209 and T. D. 49753; schedule D, at 45 percent under paragraph 1209 and T. D. 49753; schedule E, at 30 percent under paragraph 1209 and T. D. 49753; and schedule F, at 35 percent under paragraph 1209 and T. D. 49753.
EXHIBIT 32.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of American Renal Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph A. Carlucci, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Joseph A. Carlucci 
|Joseph A. Carlucci     
|Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2011
KATHERINE ANNE SMITH

, Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS W. SMITH AND E. DREW MITCHELL, AS CO

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT H. SMITH. IN RE: ESTATE OF ROBERT H. SMITH, DECEASED

, Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4723

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Robert E. Long, Jr. , Judge

. F. Wallace Pope, Jr., Brandon D. Bellew, and Caitlein J. Jammo of Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP, Clearwater , for Appellant.

Dubose Ausley, James P. Judkins, and Kevin A. Forsthoefel of Ausley McMullen, Tallahassee; Larry D. Simpson, Tallahassee , for Appellee s

.2 PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR

, JAY

, and M.K. THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 24, 2014

h0616 

# Order

Clerk June 24, 2014

149102

VICTORIA BROWN and JAMES

BROWN,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 149102

COA: 320730

Wayne CC: 11

- 006128

- NI

RACHEL WONSACK and IRENE LOVE,

Defendants

- Appellants.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIE D, because the Court is not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the

Court of Appeals.
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
SodaStream International Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Daniel Birnbaum, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Daniel Erdreich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



April 18, 2016



|By: | /s/ Daniel Birnbaum            |  | /s/ Daniel Erdreich           
|--- | ------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|    | Name: Daniel Birnbaum          |  | Name: Daniel Erdreich         
|    | Title: Chief Executive Officer |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Chief Joseph

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Chief Joseph 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Region 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Forest Service, USDA, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Poster commemorating the designation of the Nee-me-poo trail as part of the National Recreation Trail system. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Joseph (Nez Percé Chief), 1840-1904 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  Hells Canyon National Recreation Area (OR and Idaho)Wallowa National Forest (OR)Whitman National Forest (OR) 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  OregonIdaho 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  131 × 43 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2007269EN.01002901.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/29

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'Etat (France) lodged on 8 August 2007 — Association Nationale pour la Protection des Eaux et Rivieres — TOS v Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable Development

(Case C-381/07)

(2007/C 269/50)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d'Etat

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Association Nationale pour la Protection des Eaux et Rivieres — TOS

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable Development

Defendant:

Question referred

May Article 6 of Directive 2006/11/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 on pollution caused by certain dangerous substances discharged into the aquatic environment of the Community (1) be interpreted as allowing the Member States, once programmes to reduce water pollution including environmental quality standards have been adopted under that article, to introduce a declaratory scheme, in respect of facilities regarded as being low-polluting in nature, with a reference to those standards and a right on the part of the administrative authority to object to the commencement of the operations or to impose limits on discharges specific to the facility concerned?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 64 of 4.3.2006, p. 52.

1

---