alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10237)

#### Standard Brands Paint Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 29562.

(Decided May 7, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Edward N. C-Tad*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*William H. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(James F. O’Hara,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

On call of this case at the term of court in Los Angeles on February 2, 1962, counsel stipulated, in open court, that the merchandise covered by the entry in this appeal for reappraisement was entered after February 27, 1958, and was not on the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521, under section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat.' *636943, T.D. 54165. The case was then submitted on a further written stipulation of counsel for the parties, which was filed of record, as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between tbe attorneys for tbe parties hereto:

> 1. That tbe above entitled appeal for reappraisement is limited to tbe merchandise shipped by Hasegawa Shoten Co. of Japan.

> 2. That the said merchandise was appraised under Section 402(b) of the Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, 2nd Session.

> 3. That at the time of exportation to the United States, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, was the appraised unit values less the proportionate share of the inland freight, storage, hauling and lighterage, insurance premium and petty shown on the invoices to be included in the unit invoice values.

Accepting these two stipulations as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, *supra,*is the proper basis for determination of the values of the merchandise shipped by Hasegawa Shoten Co. of Japan, described in the invoice covered by the entry in this appeal for reappraisement, and that such values of the respective items of merchandise are the appraised unit values, less the proportionate share of the inland freight, storage, hauling and lighterage, insurance premium, and petties, all as shown on the invoice which is included in the official papers filed with the court in this suit.

As to all other merchandise, this appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7344

MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DOJ, Jeff Sessions-Former U.S. Attorney General; IRENE JOSEY, Former U.S. 

Attorney; STACEY D HAYNES, AUSA; SCARLET A. WILSON, Former AUSA; 

ROBERT WAIZENHOFFER, FBI Special Agent; RODNEY PRITCHARD, FBI 

Special Agent; CHARLES KLATZ, FBI Special Agent; FBI; UNKNOWN INS 

AGENTS, Department of Homeland Security; UNKNOWN SHERIFFS, Richland 

County Sheriff Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-03164-JFA)

Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Owen Harriot, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Owen Harriot appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 

(2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. 

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Harriot’s motion for transcripts at government 

expense and affirm based on the district court’s holding that Harriot’s complaint is barred 

by the statute of limitations. Harriot v. DOJ, No. 3:18-cv-03164-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 

2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case: 2:11-cv-00860-EAS-TPK Doc #: 14 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 1 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00860-EAS-TPK Doc #: 14 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 2 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00860-EAS-TPK Doc #: 14 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 3 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00860-EAS-TPK Doc #: 14 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 4 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00860-EAS-TPK Doc #: 14 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 5 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00860-EAS-TPK Doc #: 14 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 6 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00860-EAS-TPK Doc #: 14 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 7 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T14:51:50-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bona Film Group Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dong Yu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
April 30, 2012

By:

/s/ Dong YuName:

Dong YuTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
# C_2008189EN.01000901.xml

| 26.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 July 2008

(2008/C 189/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5734 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 168,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4619 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78880 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4610 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6268 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 127,51 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0815 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,595 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 231,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7032 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,2080 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5675 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,385 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8966 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6438 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5968 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,2698 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1159 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1407 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 584,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,9481 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7275 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2182 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 352,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1129 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,143 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,7435 |
| THB | Thai baht | 52,608 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4808 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,7525 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5734

JPY

Japanese yen

168,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4619

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78880

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4610

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6268

ISK

Iceland króna

127,51

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0815

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,595

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

231,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7032

PLN

Polish zloty

3,2080

RON

Romanian leu

3,5675

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,385

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8966

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6438

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5968

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,2698

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1159

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1407

KRW

South Korean won

1 584,41

ZAR

South African rand

11,9481

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7275

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2182

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 352,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1129

PHP

Philippine peso

69,143

RUB

Russian rouble

36,7435

THB

Thai baht

52,608

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4808

MXN

Mexican peso

15,7525

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 18 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 18

 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2005

Mr. McConnell (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. McCain, Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
Brownback, Mr. Obama, Ms. Murkowski, and Mr. Alexander) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress approves the 
renewal of the import restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the 
Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.
                                 <all>
```
Before the First Division,

August 31, 1942

No. 47519.

#### Protests 862682-G, etc., of Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0114

_________________ IN RE THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF: C. PATRICIA FIELD, Deceased. SCOTT FIELD,

Appellant, v. ESTATE OF C. PATRICIA FIELD and GREG FIELD ,

Appellees and Cross - Appellants. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Christopher D. Abbott , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2023

09/20/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0114
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

JOHN W. McQUEEN,

Plaintiff, 

vs. Civil Action 2:12-CV-166

Judge Smith

Magistrate Judge King

T. PYLES, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

In the initial screen of the Complaint performed on March 1, 2012,

the Court granted the defendants “45 days after service of process to

respond to the Complaint.” Initial Screen of the Complaint, Doc. No. 9.

The record demonstrates that service of process on defendant Pyles was

completed on May 15, 2012. See Return of Service, Doc. No. 18. See also

Order, Doc. No. 16. Nine (9) days later, defendant Pyles filed a motion

to dismiss. Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Doc. No. 20.

Because the motion to dismiss was not untimely filed, plaintiff’s

motion to strike that motion, Doc. No. 21, is DENIED.

 s/ Norah McCann King 

 Norah McCann King

 United States Magistrate Judge

June 6, 2012

Date

Case: 2:12-cv-00166-GCS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 06/06/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Evolution Acquisition Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 23, 2012



/s/ Joseph Rozelle

Joseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual Report of Laredo Resources Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert Gardner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.




Date: December 17, 2013
By:
/s/ Robert GardnerName: Robert GardnerTitle: Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director





This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 15

Board of Directors
Texas Industries, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment
Number 9 to Registration Statement Number 2-48986 on Form S-8, Registration
Statement Number 33-53715 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Number
333-11604 on Form S-8 of Texas Industries, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses
of our report dated March 20, 2002, relating to the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements of Texas Industries, Inc. which are
included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2002.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not part of
the Registration Statement prepared or certified by accountants within the
meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.



                                             /s/  Ernst & Young LLP
                                             ----------------------
April 10, 2002
Dallas, Texas

                                      -22-
**EXHIBIT 8.1**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 

| · | Fujian Xiniya Garments and Weaving Co., Ltd., incorporated in the People’s Republic of China             |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                           |
| · | Xiamen Xiniya Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd., incorporated in the People’s Republic of China |
|   |                                                                                                           |
| · | Xiniya (China) Company Limited, incorporated in the People’s Republic of China                           |
|   |                                                                                                           |
| · | Xiniya Holdings Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong S.A.R.                                                      |
No. 48674.

#### Protests 610982-G, etc., of Abad Esteve Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146 and 48269. The protests were therefore sustained.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9106 

To direct the Director of the United States Secret Service to apply the 

same standards for determining the number of agents required to protect 

Presidents, Vice Presidents, and major Presidential and Vice Presidential 

candidates, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2024 

Mr. LAWLER (for himself, Mr. TORRES of New York, Mr. MOLINARO, Mr. 

WILLIAMS of New York, and Mr. KEAN of New Jersey) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Director of the United States Secret Service 

to apply the same standards for determining the number 

of agents required to protect Presidents, Vice Presidents, 

and major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhanced Presidential 

5 Security Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9106 IH

1 SEC. 2. UNIFORM STANDARDS FOR SECRET SERVICE PRO2 TECTION OF PRESIDENTS, VICE PRESIDENTS, 

3 AND MAJOR PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE PRESI4 DENTIAL CANDIDATES. 

5 The Director of the United States Secret Service 

6 shall apply the same standards for determining the num7 ber of agents required to protect Presidents, Vice Presi8 dents, and major Presidential and Vice Presidential can9 didates. 

10 SEC. 3. REPORT. 

11 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

12 of this Act, the Director of the United States Secret Serv13 ice shall conduct a comprehensive review of the provision 

14 of protection by the Secret Service for Presidents, Vice 

15 Presidents, former Presidents, and major Presidential and 

16 Vice Presidential candidates, and submit to the Committee 

17 on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives 

18 and the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern19 mental Affairs of the Senate a report that includes the 

20 findings from such review, along with any recommenda21 tions for improving the provision of protection. 

22 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

23 There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as 

24 may be necessary to carry out this Act. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9106 IH

1 SEC. 5. DEFINITION. 

2 In this Act, the term ‘‘major Presidential and Vice 

3 Presidential candidates’’ has the meaning given such term 

4 in section 3056 of title 18, United States Code, and in5 cludes any other Presidential or Vice Presidential can6 didate for whom the President has otherwise authorized 

7 the Secret Service to protect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED AUGUST 31, 2000 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,951
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,941
<INVENTORY>                                    249,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               356,138
<PP&E>                                       2,061,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                 801,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,827,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,847
<BONDS>                                        607,246
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          200,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,067
<OTHER-SE>                                     697,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,829,040
<SALES>                                        365,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               365,172
<CGS>                                          291,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  291,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (373)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,219
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,767
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,664
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,664
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13


</TABLE>