alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The work of Charles & Ray Eames, a legacy of invention, May 20 - September 4, 1999

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The work of Charles & Ray Eames, a legacy of invention, May 20 - September 4, 1999 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  Library of Congress 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Library of Congress 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Eames, CharlesEames, RayEames (Charles & Ray) Collection (Library of Congress) 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  160 × 42 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  041984385.jpg; 041984385.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 10.3


 


FAVRILLE, INC.


 


SALARY DEFERRAL PAYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, at the May 28, 2008 meeting of the Special Strategic
Meeting of the Board of Directors of Favrille, Inc. (the “Company”), due to the Company’s dire financial condition and in consideration
of his continued employment and other benefits provided by the Company, John P. Longenecker, the Company’s President
and Chief Executive Officer, agreed to immediately and indefinitely forgo
receiving any future salary payments until such time as the Company may resume
making such salary payments to him without jeopardizing the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern.


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Dr. Longenecker desire to formally
document their agreement with respect to the terms of deferral of payment of Dr. Longenecker’s
salary compensation.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, Dr. Longenecker and the Company hereby agrees as
follows:


 


1.              In consideration of Dr. Longenecker’s
continued employment and other benefits provided by the Company, on an ongoing basis from and after June 7,
2008, the Company will defer
making payment of Dr. Longenecker’s otherwise payable salary compensation.


 


2.             Any salary payments
deferred pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this Agreement will be paid to Dr. Longenecker
as soon as practicable after such
payments may be made without jeopardizing the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern.


 


3.             The Company will resume paying Dr. Longenecker’s
salary compensation on an ongoing basis as soon as practicable after such
salary payments may resume without jeopardizing the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern, subject to Dr. Longenecker’s continued
service with the Company.


 


4.              The Company’s
obligations under this Agreement are unfunded and unsecured, and Dr. Longenecker
will have no rights to the deferred salary amounts other than those of the
Company’s general creditors.


 


5.              It is intended that
any deferred salary payments will qualify for the exception from application of
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code that is available under Treas.
Reg. §1.409A-1(b)(4)(ii).


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of the date(s) set forth below.


 


	
  /s/ John P. Longenecker

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
   June 27, 2008

  
	
  JOHN P. LONGENECKER

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  FAVRILLE, INC.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Tamara A. Seymour

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
   June 27, 2008

  
	
  Tamara A. Seymour, Chief
  Financial Officer
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGES O F PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : No. 33 6 Common Pleas Judicial Classification Docket

**O R D E R**
**PER CURIA M:** 

AND NOW , this 4 th day of March , 201 6 , the Petition s of Sheila Woods

Skipper, President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of the First Judicial District of Pennsylvania, for the extension of temporary assignment of Jud ges of Philadelphia Municipal Court to the Court of Common Pleas of the First Judicial District of Pennsylvania are hereby granted, as follows :

Hon. Frank T. Brady Hon. Martin S. Coleman Hon. James M. DeLeon Hon. Teresa Carr Deni Hon. Patrick F. Dugan Hon. Joyce O. Eubanks Hon. Jacquelyn Frazier

- Lyde Hon. Thomas F. Gehret Hon. Barbara S. Gilbert Hon. Charles Hayden Hon. Nazario Jimenez, Jr. Hon. Lydia Y. Kirkland Hon. Gerard A. Kosinski Ho n. Henry Lewandowski III Hon. Wi lliam A. Meehan, Jr. Hon. Bradley K. Moss Hon. M arsha H. Neifield Hon. We ndy L. Pew Hon. Harvey W . Robbins-2

- Hon. T. Francis Shields Hon. David C. Shuter Hon. Karen Y. Simmons Hon. Craig M. W ashington Hon. Marvin L. Wi lliams
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas C. OConnor, President of Duke Energy Gas Transmission Services, LLC, General Partner of Texas Eastern, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Texas Eastern.



|Date: August 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Thomas C. OConnor                           
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | Thomas C. OConnor                               
|                      |  | President                                        
|                      |  | Duke Energy Gas Transmission Services, LLC       
|                      |  | General Partner of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP



17
Fw: wegman, et al - re: Coarse PM NAAQS w/Nat'l Cattlemen's Beef 

Assoc/Nat'l Mining Assoc - Room #C300A - Call-in #919-541-4407

Scott Jenkins to: Tricia Crabtree 06/02/2010 11:10 AM

Below is the invitation. We met with representatives of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association and the 

National Mining Association. They presented their concerns with the current PM10 standard and with the 

possibility that EPA could tighten that standard in the current review of the PM NAAQS. 

Scott Jenkins, Ph.D.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air and Radiation

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

919-541-1167 (v)

jenkins.scott@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US on 06/02/2010 11:08 AM -----

wegman, et al - re: Coarse PM NAAQS w/Nat'l Cattlemen's Beef 

Assoc/Nat'l Mining Assoc - Room #C300A - Call-in #919-541-4407

Thu 04/15/2010 2:00 PM - 3:30 

PM

Attendance is for Scott Jenkins

Chair: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

Sent By: Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US

Rooms: Conf. Rm. C300A/RTP-Bldg C@EPA

This entry has an alarm. The alarm will go off before the entry starts.

Required:

Beth Hassett-Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen 

Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lindsay Stanek/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mary 

Ross/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven 

Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tom Luben/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Zachary 

Pekar/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Description
Personal Notes
No. 48657.

#### Protests 633024-G, etc., of S. S. Pierce Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146 and 48269. The protests were therefore sustained.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 31, 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00088

- CV

SOUTH CENTRAL HOUSTO N ACTION D/B/A CENTR AL CARE COMMUNITY HEALTH CAR E , Appellant

V.
BRENDA STEWART , Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st Distr ict Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 21879



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N On January 21, 2015, appellant filed a notice of appeal from an interlocutory order signed January 13, 2015, denying appellant’s motion to reconsider the December 16, 2014 , denial of its motion to dismiss filed pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a. Rule 91a allows a party to move to dismiss a cause of action on the ground that it has no basis in law or in fact. See Wooley v. Schaffer , 447 S.W.3d 71, 74 (Tex. App.

— H ouston [14th Dist.] 2014 , pet. filed ) (citing T ex.R.2

Civ. P. 91 a.1 )

. An order denying a motion to dismiss is an interlocutory order. Appellate courts have jurisdiction to consider immediate appeals of interlocutory orders only if a statute explicitly pr ovides appellate jurisdiction. Stary v. DeBord , 967 S.W.2d 352, 352

- 53 (Tex. 1998) ; ReadyOne Indus., Inc. v. Guillen

- Chavez , 394 S.W.3d 724, 726 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2012, no pet.) (citing Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012 , 51.014 ).

Because there is no specific statut ory authorization , an interlocutory appeal is not permitted in this situation. See In re Essex Ins. Co ., 450 S.W.3d 524, 528 (Tex. 2014) (granting mandamus relief after finding relator had no adequate remedy by appea l to challenge the denial of a motion to dismiss) ; see also City of Austin v. Liberty Mut. Ins ., 431 S.W.3d 817, 822 (Tex. App.

— Austin 2014, no pet.) (stating that because the Rule 91a mo tion challenged the trial court’ s subject

matter jurisdiction , section 51.014(a)(8) gra nted the right to an interlocutory appeal of the trial court's denial of the motion )

. In this case, t here is no jurisdictional challenge for which an interlocutory appeal is authorized. On March 2, 2015, the court notified the parties that the appeal woul d be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a response on or before March 17, 2015, demonstrating this court’s jurisdiction over the appeal. No response was filed. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise.
No. 53663.

protest 110039-K (A)/91545 (Chicago).

#### Denebeim Distilling Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
RAILROAD EQUIPMENT ACCIDENT/INCIDENT 

REPORTING THRESHOLD 

1

Collisions, derailments, fires, explosions, acts of God, or other events involving the 

operation of railroad on-track equipment (standing or moving) and causing reportable 

damages greater than the reporting threshold for the year in which the accident/incident 

occurred must be reported using Form FRA F 6180.54. The following table shows the 

reporting threshold. 

For 

Calendar 

Year 

Reporting 

Threshold 

2014 $10,500 

2013 $9,900 

2012 $9,500 

2011 $9,400 

2010 $9,200 

2009 $8,900 

2008 $8,500 

2007 $8,200 

2006 $7,700 

2005 $6,700 

2004 $6,700 

2003 $6,700 

2002 $6,700 

2001 $6,600 

2000 $6,600 

1999 $6,600 

1998 $6,600 

1997 $6,500 

1996 $6,300 

1995 $6,300 

1994 $6,300 

1993 $6,300 

1992 $6,300 

1991 $6,300 

1990 $5,700 

1989 $5,700 

1988 $5,200 

1987 $5,200 
RAILROAD EQUIPMENT ACCIDENT/INCIDENT 

REPORTING THRESHOLD 

2

1986 $4,900 

1985 $4,900 

1984 $4,500 

1983 $4,500 

1982 $3,700 

1981 $3,700 

1980 $2,900 

1979 $2,900 

1978 $2,300 

1977 $2,300 

1976 $1,750 

1975 $1,750 

1957-1974 $750
S. J. Res. 28

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

Joint Resolution

Approving the location of the commemorative work in the District of Columbia

honoring former President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code provides

that the location of a commemorative work in the area described

as Area I shall be deemed authorized only if approved by law

not later than 150 days after notification to Congress and others

that the commemorative work may be located in Area I;

Whereas section 8162 of the Department of Defense Appropriations

Act, 2000 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note) authorizes the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission to establish a memorial on Federal

land in the District of Columbia to honor Dwight D. Eisenhower;

and

Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress of

her determination that the memorial should be located in Area

I: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the location

of the commemorative work to honor Dwight D. Eisenhower, authorized by section 8162 of the Department of Defense Appropriations

Act, 2000 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note), within Area I as depicted on

the map referred to in section 8908(a) of title 40, United States

Code, is approved.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
(Reap. Dec. 8367)

#### Theodore B. Smith Co., a/c E. R. Squibb & Sons *v.*United States

Entry No. 717440, etc.

(Decided December 8, 1954)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

Presented for determination by the court is the question of the proper value for duty purposes of certain steel drums filled with medicinal cod-liver oil. The importations in issue are covered by the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in *559schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part of the decision herein.

The parties, have agreed that the subject merchandise consists of steel drums imported from Iceland filled with duty-free cod-liver oil, and that such merchandise was exported from Iceland during the years 1942 to 1946, inclusive. It was stipulated that the issues involved in the instant appeals for a reappraisement are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *E. R. Squibb & Sons et al.,*42 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 23, C. A. D. 564 — wherein it was held that the steel drums were properly dutiable in their condition as imported on the basis of United States value, as defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (e)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 — and that the record in said case may be incorporated into the records of the present appeals for a reappraisement.

The parties hereto further stipulated and agreed—

> * * * that the value or price, at the time of exportation of the involved steel drums to the United States, at which such or similar drums were freely offered for sale for domestic consumption, packed ready for delivery, in the principal market of the United States to all purchasers, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, was 50 cents per drum during the years 1942 to 1945 inclusive, and 60 cents per drum during the year 1946; and that plaintiffs waive and claim no allowance for cost of transportation, insurance, expenses from the place of shipment to the place of delivery, commission, profits, or general expenses.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the dates of exportation of the steel drums here involved, such or similar drums were not freely offered for sale in Iceland either for home consumption or for exportation to the United States.

Upon tbe agreed facts, the court holds, as matter of law, that the proper basis of value for the imported drums in issue is United States value, as that value is defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, and that such value was 50 cents each for the drums exported during the period 1942 to 1945, inclusive, and 60 cents each for the drums exported during the year 1946, less the item of duty in each instance.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Call Social Security toll free 1-800-SSA-1213, personal service available 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. each business day

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Call Social Security toll free 1-800-SSA-1213, personal service available 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. each business day 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Social Security Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 41 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  024439674.jpg; 024439674.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 45098.

#### Protest 41555-K of Joensson Import Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of dried ginger root the same as that the subject of *Wilson*v. *United States*(28 C. C. P. A. 63, C. A. D. 126). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1768 was therefore sustained.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00432
- CV

In re Derrick Lamont Bailey, Jr.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Derrick Lamont Bailey , Jr. filed a pro se application for a pretrial writ of habeas corpus. However, this Court does not have original habeas jurisdiction in criminal cases. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d) (limiting original habeas jurisdiction of courts of appeals to civil cases); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11. 05 (“The Court of Criminal Appeals, the District Courts, the County Courts, or any Judge of said Courts, have power to issue the writ of habeas corpus; and it is their duty, upon proper motion, to grant the writ under the rules prescribed by law.”); In re Fuchs , No. 03

- 16

- 00012

- CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 3737, at *1

- 2 (Tex. App.

— Austin Apr. 13, 2016, orig. proceeding) (dismissing original habeas application for want of jurisdiction). Accordingly, we dismiss Bailey’s application for want of jurisdiction.

___ _________ ______________________________ Gisela D. Triana , Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Triana Filed: Ju ne 28 , 2019
A90A0637.

#### ALSTROM v. ALLSTATE ENTERPRISES, INC.

(394 SE2d 801)

Decided April 16, 1990

Rehearing denied April 30, 1990.

*Levy & Adams, D. Marrill Adams,*for appellant.

*Hayt, Hayt & Landau, Moshe Shopsin,*for appellee.

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The appellant filed this direct appeal from a denial of his motion to set aside a judgment pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (d). Such an appeal requires the discretionary appeal procedure as provided by OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8), and the failure to comply with that procedure requires dismissal of this appeal. *Parker v. Bellamy-Lunda-Dawson,*190 Ga. App. 257 (378 SE2d 502) (1989).

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.*