alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v EUGENE LAURIE, Private E-1, U. S. Army, Appellant

6 USCMA 478, 20 CMR 194

No. 6932

Decided November 4, 1955

*First Lieutenant Philip L. Evans*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief was *Lieutenant Colonel James M. Scott.*

*Captain Vernon M. Culpepper*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel Thomas*J. *Newton*and *First Lieutenant Edward S. Nelson.*

*479Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. Latimer, Judge:

Following his conviction by general court-martial of desertion in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 679, the accused was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement for two years. Intermediate reviewing authorities have affirmed, and we granted the petition for review because another case was pending which involved the same issue, that is, whether the policy of the convening authority of refusing to consider the suspension or remission of punitive discharges in any case, prejudiced the right of the accused to a full review of his sentence.

The principles set forth in United States v Wise, 6 USCMA 472, 20 CMR 188, decided this day, dispose of the only issue involved.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to another convening authority for proper action.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Bros-man concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 911 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue 

an order requiring installation of a secondary cockpit barrier on certain 

aircraft, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, 

Mr. CARSON, Mr. KEAN of New Jersey, and Mr. LYNCH) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue an order requiring installation of a secondary cockpit barrier on certain aircraft, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saracini Enhanced 

5 Aviation Safety Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 911 IH

1 SEC. 2. INSTALLATION OF SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS 

2 ON EXISTING AIRCRAFT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

5 of the Federal Aviation Administration shall issue an 

6 order requiring installation of a secondary cockpit barrier 

7 on each covered aircraft. 

8 (b) COVERED AIRCRAFT.—In this section, the term 

9 ‘‘covered aircraft’’ means a commercial passenger aircraft 

10 operating under the provisions of part 121 of title 14, 

11 Code of Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### United States *v.*Winerich Manufacturing Co., Inc.

No. 7601.

Entry No. CE 35-C.

— Invoice dated Mexico, D. F., April 2, 1946.

Certified April 4, 1946.

Entered at Corpus Ghristi, Tex., April 8, 1946.

(Decided June 16, 1948)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard H. Welsh,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been sub-' mitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country .from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States — is as follows:

Primorea Fantacia Surtido, 15 y 25, 10004.30 Mts. @

Mex. $1.80 per Mts.

Rodiezmina, 5472.00 Mts., *@*Mex. $1.70 per Mts.

Plus “Envase” or containers_ 350. 00

Plus Packing_ 50. 42

Plus Tax (or “stamps”)_ 450. 63

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

*268IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

Primorea Pantacia Surtido, 15 y 25, 10004.30 Mts. *@*

Mex. $1.80 per Mts.

Rodiezmina, 5472.00 Mts., @ Mex. $1.70 per Mts.

Plus “Envase” dr containers__ 350. 00

Plus Packing_ 50. 42

Plus Tax (dr “stamp's”)_ 450. 63

Judgment will be rendered accordingly..
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

**Zuoan Fashion Limited**

 

List of Subsidiaries

 
| **Subsidiary**                     | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of   Incorporation** |
|------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|
| Fast Boost Holdings Limited        |       | British Virgin Islands                   |
| Champion Goal Holdings Limited     |       | Hong Kong                                |
| Zuoan Dress Co., Ltd., Shishi |       | People’s Republic of China          |
| Shanghai Mingfu Fashion Limited    |       | People’s Republic of China          |

 

----
# C_2007316EN.01006101.xml

| 28.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/61

---

Publication of the vacancy notice for the post of secretary-general (grade AD16 — special career bracket)

(Article 2(a) and Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the European Communities)

(Article 2(a) and Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the European Communities)

(2007/C 316/10)

Staff of the European institutions are hereby informed of the vacancy notice for the post of secretary-general of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) published in the English, French and German versions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ C 316 A, 28.12.2007).

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Before the Third Division,

May 27, 1958

No. 62002.

#### McKesson & Robbins, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 273961-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Summer of 2002 fire in the Rockies

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Summer of 2002 fire in the Rockies 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Fire in the Rockies 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Bureau of Land Management 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  2000-2010 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  Rocky Mountains 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 76 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  052103509.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Performance Criteria Terms for Performance-Based Awards



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Performance Criteria Terms 
 A Performance Criterion must be an objectively determinable measure of performance
relating to any or any combination of the following (measured either absolutely or by reference to an index or indices and determined either on a consolidated basis or, as the context permits, on a divisional, subsidiary, line of business, project
or geographical basis or in combinations thereof): sales; revenues; assets; expenses; earnings before or after deduction for all or any portion of interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization, whether or not on a continuing operations or an
aggregate or per share basis, including, without limitation, EBITDA or adjusted EBITDA as determined for purposes of any credit agreement or other agreement to which the Company is a party; return on equity, investment, capital or assets; one or
more operating ratios; borrowing levels, leverage ratios or credit rating; market share; capital expenditures; cash flow; net cash from operations plus or minus such expenditures, expenses, cash proceeds from dispositions (whether or not of
operating assets) and other objectively determinable adjustments, if any, as the Committee may determine; stock price; stockholder return; sales of particular products or services; customer acquisition or retention; acquisitions and divestitures (in
whole or in part); joint ventures and strategic alliances; spin-offs, split-ups and the like; reorganizations; or recapitalizations, restructurings, financings (issuance of debt or equity) or re-financings. A Performance Criterion and any targets
with respect thereto determined by the Committee need not be based upon an increase, a positive or improved result or avoidance of loss. The Committee may provide that any or any combination, or all, of the Performance Criteria applicable to an
award will be adjusted in an objectively determinable manner to reflect events (for example, but without limitation, acquisitions or dispositions) occurring during the performance period that affect the applicable Performance Criterion or Criteria,
to the extent consistent with the requirements for satisfying the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7122]



[[Page 18962]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC)

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  May 11, 2007.

Time:  9 a.m. to 3 p.m.

Place:  Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington DC 20230, Room 4830.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee 
(ETTAC) will hold a plenary meeting on May 11, 2007, at the U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230, in Room 4830. The ETTAC will discuss Committee 
priorities and goals for the year and other international topics 
related to trade and the environmental technologies industry. (e.g. the 
Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate; update on 
the latest round of negotiations in the World Trade Organization's 
environmental goods and services trade liberalization; intellectual 
property rights; etc.). The meeting is open to the public and time will 
be permitted for public comment.
    Written comments concerning ETTAC affairs are welcome anytime 
before or after the meeting. Minutes will be available within 30 days 
of this meeting.
    The ETTAC is mandated by Public Law 103-392. It was created to 
advise the U.S. government on environmental trade policies and 
programs, and to help it to focus its resources on increasing the 
exports of the U.S. environmental industry. ETTAC operates as an 
advisory committee to the Secretary of Commerce and the Trade Promotion 
Coordinating Committee (TPCC). ETTAC was originally chartered in May of 
1994. It was most recently rechartered until September 3, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Bohon, Office of Energy and 
Environmental Technologies Industries (OEEI), International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-0359. This 
meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests 
for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be 
directed to OEEI at (202) 482-5225.

     Dated: April 9, 2007.
Joe O. Neuhoff,
Director, Office of Energy and Environmental Industries.
 [FR Doc. E7-7122 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Costamare Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of The Marshall Islands (the Company), for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

|  
|--
|1.
|  
|2.

Date: March 22, 2011

|       |  |                                   
|------ |  | ----------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos
|Name:  |  | Konstantinos Konstantakopoulos    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer           



---
May 14, 1954

No. 58122.

protest 176678-K.

#### H. A. Wood *v.*United States,

Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                        TRANSAMERICA FINANCE CORPORATION
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, ROSARIO A. PERRELLI, certify that:

1)   I have reviewed this quarterly report of Transamerica Finance Corporation;

2)   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5)   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control.

         /S/  ROSARIO A. PERRELLI          Executive Vice President and Chief
------------------------------------------   Financial Officer
             (Rosario A. Perrelli)

Date:    August 8, 2003
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RONNIE LAMONT COLEY , ) )
P etitioner , ) )

v. ) ) Civ. Action No. 1 3

- 1515 (ABJ) UNITED STATES PAROLE ) COMMISSION et al

. , ) ) Respondents

. )

_________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner alleges that he was taken into custody on February 14, 2013, based on a parole

violator issued by the United States Parole Commission (“USPC”) . He commenced this action

for habeas relief from the District of Columbia Jail in October 2013, claiming that he had yet to

receive the probable cause hearing due him within five days of his arrest. Pet. for Writ of

Habeas Corpus [Dkt. # 1] at 5. In re sponse to the order to show cause why the writ should not

issue, the USPC has documented that petitioner waived his right to challenge the revocation

procedures by agree ing to an expedited revocation on September 25, 2013. See USPC’s O pp ’n to

Pet ’r’s P e t

. for a Writ of H abeas C orpus [Dkt. # 6], Ex I.

Petitioner has not replied to the USPC’s opposition and the court finds the waiver argument

properly supported. See Order [Dkt. # 7] (advising the petitioner about the consequences of his

not responding t o the opposition by November 26, 2013). In addition, since petitioner has not

shown any resulting prejudice and has been afforded a revocation hearing, his claim predicated on

a delayed probable cause hearing is moot. Therefore, the court, finding no basis to issue the writ,2 will deny the petition and dismiss the case. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum

Opinion.

____________s/___________ AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge

DATE: January 2 , 201 4
No. 54203.

#### C. J. Holt & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 148871-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the case was called for trial counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that the notice of intent required under section 22.7, Customs Regulations of 1943, was not timely filed. An examination of the official papers showed that the notice of intent was filed on January 15, 1947, while the exporting vessel cleared on December 27, 1946. Under these circumstances, it was held that the said regulation was not complied with, and, as compliance with such regulation with respect to the timeliness of filing such notices has been held to be a requisite to securing drawback *(United States*v. *Ricard-Brewster Oil Co.,*29 C. C. P. A. 192, C. A. D. 191), the motion to dismiss was granted.