alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2
                         TO TSR INC. REPORT ON FORM 10Q
                                 AUGUST 31, 2002
 CERTIFICATION BY JOHN G. SHARKEY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, Vice President of Finance of TSR, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter year ended August 31, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") accompanying this
certification fully complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The
foregoing certification is incorporated solely for purposes of complying with
the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to
be used for any other purpose.

Dated:   October 2, 2002




                                  /s/ John G. Sharkey
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                      John G. Sharkey, Vice President of Finance
# C_2008230EN.01000301.xml

| 9.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 September 2008

(2008/C 230/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4214 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 154,42 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4568 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4591 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6052 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,98 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9975 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,938 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 241,10 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7039 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,4720 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5908 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,290 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7359 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7346 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5091 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0912 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1086 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0285 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 536,68 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1397 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7271 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1360 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 217,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8832 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,130 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,1680 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,067 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4199 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 14,7939 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4214

JPY

Japanese yen

154,42

DKK

Danish krone

7,4568

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80720

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4591

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6052

ISK

Iceland króna

123,98

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9975

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,938

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

241,10

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7039

PLN

Polish zloty

3,4720

RON

Romanian leu

3,5908

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,290

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7359

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7346

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5091

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0912

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1086

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0285

KRW

South Korean won

1 536,68

ZAR

South African rand

11,1397

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7271

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1360

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 217,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8832

PHP

Philippine peso

66,130

RUB

Russian rouble

36,1680

THB

Thai baht

49,067

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4199

MXN

Mexican peso

14,7939

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
No. 62013.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 221238-K, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61992.

#### John Edgar Staren *v.*United States,

protests 206434-K, etc. (Nogales).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora,*S. *A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         140,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,176,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,487,000
<PP&E>                                         630,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 383,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,751,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          431,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    126,000
<COMMON>                                       489,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     539,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,751,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,605,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,277,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                308,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    77,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            231,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   231,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Dethrone Royalty Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Toby McBride, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: October 29, 2012  /s/ Toby McBride Toby McBride Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10.21

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                          EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
                                (THE "AGREEMENT")


         Reference is made to the Agreement between you (the "Executive") and
the undersigned Employer with respect to certain severance arrangements which
apply only in the event that a Change in Control of the Corporation occurs after
the date of the Agreement.

         Capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings given to them in
the Agreement unless expressly provided otherwise.

         As an inducement to the Executive to continue his employment with the
Employer, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         Paragraph 16 of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to state:

                  Absent a change in control or unless extended in writing by
                  the parties hereto, this Agreement shall expire on January 14,
                  2001.

         Except as specifically provided in this Amendment No. 1, the provisions
of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 is executed by or on behalf of
the undersigned as of October 15, 1998.


                                    OVERSEAS CORPORATION



                                    By:    ______________________________
                                           Managing Director at Overseas
                                           Corporation


                                    By:    ______________________________
                                           Michael J. Berthelot


Accepted and agreed:

___________________________________
Employee




                                       24
Order filed October 27 , 2017.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00537

- CV

____________ STOCKDICK LAND COMPA NY, STEPHEN N. RINER , AND WADE A. RINER , Appellant s
V.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATION AL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE AND CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008

- 60974A



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed August 25, 2017. O ur review has determined
that relevant item s have been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the orders of partial non

- suit signed December 16, 2016 and January 4, 2017

.The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s

record on or before November 6, 2017 , containing the orders of partial non

- suit signed December 16, 2016 and January 4, 2017

. If the omitted item s are not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certifie d statement that the
omitted item s are not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD JOSHUA SMITH,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

DHARMYIR SINGH, Doctor; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 23

- 15351

D.C. No.

2:20

- cv

- 00101

- TLN

- JDP

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 27, 2024 * *

San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Donald Joshua Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to Defendant Dr. Dharmyir Singh

. 1 Smith alleges that Dr.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1 Smith’s motion s for default judgment are DENIED

. Dkt. No s . 18 , 20

. To

the extent Smith intends to invoke forfeiture, Dr. Singh had already timely filed an answering brief when Smith filed his motion s

. 

# FILED

MAR 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

Singh was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs while incarcerated

in violation of the Eight h Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291

. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung , 391 F.3d 1051 , 1056 (9th Cir.

2004)

, and w e affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for Dr. Singh because

Smith presented no evidence that the treatment Dr. Singh provided “ was medically

unacceptable under the circumstances

, and was chosen in conscious disregard of an

excessive risk to [his] health.” Id. at 1058 ( quotation marks omitted )

. Dr. Singh

saw Smith twice over two months for pain in his arm and back

. Dr. Singh

conducted physical examinations and reviewed an x

- ray that showed no

abnormalities. Dr. Singh ordered physical thera py, prescribed Tylenol, and

changed Smith’s work classification to limited duty with weight restrictions. D r.

S ingh diagnosed Smith with epicondylitis, or “tennis elbow ,” which is supported

by the physical therapy assessments.

Smith argues that Dr. Singh should have ordered imaging and/or surgery and

released him from work duties, but “[a] difference of opinion between a physician

and the prisoner . . . concerning what medical care is appropriate does not amount

to deliberate indifference.” Hamby v. Hammond , 821 F.3d 1085 , 1092 (9th Cir.

2016) (quotation marks omitted).

Because we can affirm the grant of summary judgment solely on the ground3

that Smith presented no evidence that Dr. Singh was deliberately indifferent to

Smith’s serious medical needs, we need not consider the issue of qualified

immunity.

AFFIRMED.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# General quarters

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  General quarters 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. NavyDraper, William F., 1912-2003 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Navy 
                    -           Description        
                    -  General quarters by William F. Draper 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Navy 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  171 × 56 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  025541590.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KEVIN RAMON GRAY,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-14-00103-CR

Appeal from the

372nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1320429D)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until November 4, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. J. Warren St. John, the Appellant’s Attorney, prepare 

the State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 4, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8

th day of October, 2014.

PER CURIAM
(Reap. Dec. 9251)

#### Yale Sales Company James G. Wiley v. United States

Entry No. DE 12172, etc.

*577(Decided November 10, 1958)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Henry J. O’Neill,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

JohnsoN, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, consolidated at the trial, present the question of the proper dutiable value of various precision tools and gauges imported from England on various dates from April 1952 through February 1956.

At the trial, counsel for the respective parties stipulated as follows:

> Mb. King: * * *

> We offer to stipulate that at or about the period in question such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in England, or for export to the United States, and that such or similar imported merchandise was not freely offered for sale in the principal markets of the United States.

> We further offer to stipulate that the cost of production of such or similar merchandise, as such cost of production is defined in Section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, was as follows: For that merchandise which was appraised at the unit values less 25 percent, less 2)4 percent, plus export packing, the cost of production as defined in Section 402 (f), was the unit values less 33)4 percent, less 2)4 percent, plus export packing.

> We further offer to stipulate that the cost of production as defined in Section 402 (f) for the merchandise which was appraised at the unit values less 20 percent, less 2)4 percent, plus export packing, was the unit values less 25 percent, less 2)4 percent, plus export packing.

> Mb. O’Neill: The Government so agrees and stipulates.

On the agreed facts I find that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein, and that such values are as follows: For the merchandise which was appraised at the unit values, less 25 per centum, less *2%*per centum, plus export packing, such value is the unit values, less 33K per centum, less *2%*per centum, plus export packing, and for the merchandise which was appraised at the unit values, less 20 per centum, less 2 *%*per centum, plus export packing, such value is the unit values, less 25 per centum, less 2K per centum, plus export packing.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 99.1





Deloitte & Touche LLP


30 Rockefeller Plaza


New York, NY 10112


USA





Tel:   +1 212 492 4000


Fax:  +1 212 489 1687


www.deloitte.com








REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of New Mountain Finance Corporation


We have audited the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities of New Mountain Finance Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and have issued our report dated February 28, 2022. We have also previously audited the consolidated statements of assets, liabilities and members’ capital of New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C. (“NMF Holdings”), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in members’ capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, and have issued our report dated March 5, 2014; and we expressed unqualified opinions on those consolidated financial statements. Our audits of the Company and NMF Holdings also included the information as of December 31, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012, appearing under the caption “Senior Securities”. This information is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Information about the Company’s senior securities as of December 31,2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and information about NMF Holdings’ senior securities as of December 31, 2013, and 2012 appearing under the caption “Senior Securities” has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated financial statements from which it has been derived.








/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





February 28, 2022
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

TELUS CORP., GOCO TECHNOLOGY, LP,

Appellants

v.

LOGMEIN, INC., GOTO TECHNOLOGIES USA,

INC,

Appellees

______________________

2024

- 1150

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No.

91269331

.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSE D under Fed. R. App.

P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

February 16, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: February 16, 2024 Case: 24-1150 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 02/16/2024