alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-61,197]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 27, 2007 in response to a worker petition filed by a state agency on behalf of workers at Ferguson Enterprises, Portland, Oregon.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of April, 2007.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E7-6656 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 40299.

#### Protest 251280-G of R. H. Macy *&*Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items consisted of filet laces similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Jabara*(22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6964

KENNETH W. PEARCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

TOM C. MARTIN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-95-917-5-BR)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 26, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth W. Pearce, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pearce v. Martin, No. CA-95-917-5-BR

(E.D.N.C. May 31, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, William Morland , certify that:





1.        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Healthmed Services Ltd.;





2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed  under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.








By:
/s/ William MorlandDate: December 20, 2010

William MorlandPresident & Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Hazlo! Technologies, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Dated: November 15, 2011  /s/ Yung Kong Chin Yung Kong Chin Title: Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:12-cr-187-2

Renaldo Duarte-Menchaca 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 83) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: July 2, 2013 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cr-00187-JLG-TPK Doc #: 86 Filed: 07/02/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2008175EN.01000401.xml

| 10.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 July 2008

(2008/C 175/07)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5715 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 168,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4597 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79655 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4484 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6225 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 118,39 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0480 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,490 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 230,49 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7029 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,2711 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5228 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,278 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9200 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6502 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5953 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,2606 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0834 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1413 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 571,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,0418 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7758 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2429 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 415,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0987 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 71,346 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,8495 |
| THB | Thai baht | 52,881 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5282 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1809 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5715

JPY

Japanese yen

168,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,4597

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79655

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4484

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6225

ISK

Iceland króna

118,39

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0480

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,490

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

230,49

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7029

PLN

Polish zloty

3,2711

RON

Romanian leu

3,5228

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,278

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9200

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6502

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5953

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,2606

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0834

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1413

KRW

South Korean won

1 571,11

ZAR

South African rand

12,0418

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7758

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2429

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 415,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0987

PHP

Philippine peso

71,346

RUB

Russian rouble

36,8495

THB

Thai baht

52,881

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5282

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1809

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
No. 49332.

#### Protests 659712-G, etc., of Luigi Corso et al. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of Abstract 48284, which record was incorporated herein. The protests were therefore sustained to this extent.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

_____________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 10, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 130698(60) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

HIGHLAND-HOWELL DEVELOPMENT 

COMPANY, LLC, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

 SC: 130698 

v CoA: 262437

 MTT: 00-307906 

TOWNSHIP OF MARION, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Real Property Law Section 

of the State Bar of Michigan for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is 

considered and it is GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 10, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF STATION CASINOS LLC

GVR
Holdco 2 LLC
        GVR Holdco 1 LLC
                Station GVR Acquisition, LLC
NP Boulder LLC
NP Development LLC
NP IP Holdings LLC
NP Landco Holdco LLC
NP Opco Holdings LLC
        NP Opco LLC
                NP Auburn Development LLC
                NP Centerline Holdings LLC
                NP Durango LLC
                NP FH Excess LLC
                NP Fiesta LLC
                NP Fresno Land Acquisitions LLC
                NP Gold Rush LLC
                NP Green Valley LLC
                NP Hanger Leaseco LLC
                NP Horizon Park LLC
                NP Inspirada LLC
                NP Lake Mead LLC
                NP LML LLC
                NP Magic Star LLC
                NP Mt. Rose LLC
                NP Northern NV Acquisitions LLC
                NP Past Enterprises LLC
                NP Rancho LLC
                NP Reno Convention Center LLC
                NP River Central LLC
                NP ROTMA LLC
                NP Santa Fe LLC
                NP Sonoma Land Holdings LLC
                NP Steamboat LLC
                NP Sunset Lindell LLC
                NP Texas LLC
                NP Town Center LLC
NP Palace LLC
NP Red Rock LLC
NP Sunset LLC

---



QuickLinks
# C_2007283EN.01000501.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-115/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2004/27/EC - Proprietary medicinal products - Medicinal products for human use - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2007/C 283/07)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky and M. Šimerdová, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: T. Boček, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 34)

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | By failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

By failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive;

| 2. | The Czech Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Czech Republic is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.

1

---
Case: 2:12-cv-00003-EAS-EPD Doc #: 15 Filed: 06/26/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T15:16:51-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jeffrey L. Weaver, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of SP Bancorp, Inc.;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|April 30, 2014 |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffrey L. Weaver                
|Date           |  |  |  | Jeffrey L. Weaver                    
|               |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

HENRY N. HARPER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-CV-555

Judge Frost

Magistrate Judge King

WILLIAM NICHOLSON,

Defendant.

ORDER

On June 27, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge

recommended that this action be dismissed for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 4. Although plaintiff

was advised of his right to object, and of the consequences of his

failure to do so, there has nevertheless been no objection to the

recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.

This action is hereby DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§§1915(e), 1915A, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT.

Moreover, the Court concludes that an appeal from the judgment

entered in the action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C.

§1915(a).

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

 Gregory L. Frost

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cv-00555-MHW-MRA Doc #: 7 Filed: 07/14/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Before the Second Division,

September 2, 1942

No. 47524.

#### Protests 880098-G, etc., of Abraham & Straus, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

:

GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE CO. et al. :

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO.:

Plaintiff, : 2:11-cv-1153

vs. :

: ORDER GRANTING

BRENTLINGER ENTERPRISES, et al. : MOTION TO VACATE 

business as A.J. MARSHALL ELECTRIC : DATE TO FILE 

& PLUMBING : RULE 26(f) REPORT AND

: TO VACATE DATE OF 

: PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL

Defendants. : CONFERENCE 

:

ORDER

Upon motion of Plaintiff, and for good cause shown, the dates for the Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 26(f) Report and the Preliminary Pretrial Conference are hereby VACATED. Plaintiff

is in the process of tying to perfect service on defendant, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, a foreign

company located in Germany. Plaintiff is instructed to notify this Court upon perfecting service on

defendant, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG. After counsel makes an appearance for Bayerische

Motoren Werke AG, new dates will be ordered for the Rule 26(f) Report and for the Preliminary

Pretrial Conference. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-01153-ALM-TPK Doc #: 17 Filed: 05/16/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 10.39
 Execution Copy (w/ NC)
Class D Common Units
 EMPLOYEE EQUITY AGREEMENT
 Agreement Company Employee Section
9
   Issuance .
 Employee Units
  Closing Conditions
 Representations and Warranties of Employee




---



##### 



IRS 83(b)
Election). Section 5 Section 6 Related Person
 Illustrations
  2




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties of the Company
 Organization, Limited Liability Company Power
 Employee Units Duly Issued
 Authorization; No Breach; Consents
 Vesting Section 5 Section 5 Section 6
 General Vesting Start
Date Issuance Date Section 5(b) First Vesting Date provided Vested Units Section 5 Unvested Units
  3




---



##### 



Termination of Vesting Sections 5(a) Section 1 Section 5(a)
 Transfer Section 10(b)
 Rights as a Member Section 6
 Repurchase and Forfeiture of Units
 Repurchase Option Termination Section 9 Section 9 Section
6
 Purchase Price Fair Market
Value
 Repurchase Procedures Repurchase Notice
  4




---



##### 



Closing of Repurchase Sections 6(c) provided
 Termination of Repurchase Option Section 6
 Non-Compete or
  5




---



##### 



Withholding
 Definitions
 Affiliate
 Board
 Business Day
 Cause
 Common Unit Threshold D
 Common Units
 Code
 Employment Period
 Investor Members
 Issued Common Units
 LLC Agreement
  6




---



##### 



Management Control Acquisition
 Marketable Securities
 Person
 Public Offering
 Public Sale
 Qualified Public Offering
 Sale of the Company
  7




---



##### 



Securities Act
 Subsidiary
 Miscellaneous
 Consent to Amendments
 Successors and Assigns
 Severability
 Counterparts
 Descriptive Headings; Interpretation
  8




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Waiver of Jury Trial
 Notices
 If to the Company to
 
  9




---



##### 



with a copy (which will not constitute notice to the Company) to
 
 If to Employee to
   No Strict Construction
 Entire Agreement
 Time is of the Essence
   10




---



##### 



COMPANY:COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS, LLCBy:Name:Title:EMPLOYEE:[Name]Address: [ Insert ]
 Communications Infrastructure Investments, LLC  Employee Equity Agreement Signature Page