alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 8.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF GLOBUS MARITIME LIMITED



|Name                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Name Under Which the
Subsidiaries do Business
|--------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Globus Shipmanagement Corp. |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Globus Shipmanagement Corp.                  
|Elysium Maritime Limited    |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Elysium Maritime Limited                     
|Devocean Maritime Ltd.      |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Devocean Maritime Ltd.                       
|Domina Maritime Ltd.        |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Domina Maritime Ltd.                         
|Dulac Maritime S.A.         |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Dulac Maritime S.A.                          
|Kelty Marine Ltd.           |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Kelty Marine Ltd.                            
|Supreme Navigation Co.      |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Supreme Navigation Co.                       
|Rosario Maritime Inc.       |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Rosario Maritime Inc.                        
|Artful Shipholding S.A.     |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Artful Shipholding S.A.                      
|Longevity Maritime Limited  |  | Malta                         |  | Longevity Maritime Limited
exv10w1






Exhibit
10.1









June 2, 2008




Dr. Neal R. Cutler

P.O. Box 3637

Beverly Hills, CA 90212-0637




Re: Payoff of Notes




Dear Dr. Cutler:




     Reference is hereby made to that certain Settlement Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2007 by and
between Avanir Pharmaceuticals, a California corporation ("Avanir"), and Dr. Neal R. Cutler, an
individual ("you”). Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the
Settlement Agreement.



     Avanir has previously issued to you (a) three Buyer Notes in the aggregate principal amount of
$25,075,000, (b) an Alternate Contingent Note 1 in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 and
(c) an Alternate Contingent Note 2 in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000. On or about
July 2, 2007, Avanir made the Sale Payment, in the amount of $11,000,000, to you, which amount was
applied to the payment of the Notes as set forth under the Settlement Agreement.



     Avanir desires to payoff the remaining amounts due under the Notes, including all accrued but
unpaid interest, prior to the due date of such Notes. In consideration of the early payoff of the
Notes, you have agreed to reduce the aggregate amount owed under the Notes, including the
outstanding principal amount by 9.25%. Based on the foregoing and assuming that payment (in
immediately available funds) is received by you by 12:00 noon (PT) on or before June 6, 2008, the
total amount to be paid to you (the “Payoff Amount”) shall be $10,905,477.11. You hereby agree to
accept the Payoff Amount as full and final payment of all amounts due to you and all obligations
owing to you under the Notes.



     In furtherance hereof, you agree promptly do all things, presently or in the future, which may
be reasonably requested by Avanir to further effect and evidence the foregoing, including, without
limitation, the delivery to Avanir of all the Notes, subject only to prior payment by Avanir of the
Payoff Amount.



     This Payoff Letter shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of California.



 









 










     Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by signing in the space provided below. This
letter agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,







AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS

 	 
	 	 	 
	 	
 	 
	 	By:  Keith Katkin 	 
	 	Its:   President and CEO 	 
	 



Acknowledged and Agreed to by:




DR. NEAL R. CUTLER
A90A0083.

#### CARLISLE v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

(392 SE2d 344)

Banke, Presiding Judge.

On December 21, 1988, the appellant, Shirley Carlisle, filed suit against Wesley Frazier to recover for injuries allegedly sustained in an *22automobile accident which took place on December 28, 1986. On January 3, 1989, the appellee, Travelers Insurance Company, was served as the áppellant’s uninsured motorist coverage carrier. Travelers answered in its own name and moved to be dismissed from the case on the ground that it had not been served within the two-year statute of limitation. See OCGA § 9-3-33. The trial court granted the motion, and this direct appeal followed. Held:

Decided March 16, 1990.

*Mitchell, Coppedge, Wester, Bisson & Miller, Joseph T. Leman,*for appellant.

*R. Chris Irwin & Associates, David L. Whitman,*for appellee.

> “ ‘Unless the court in an order dismissing one of multiple defendants makes an express determination of finality as set out in (OCGA § 9-11-54 (b)) ...[,] the case is still pending in the trial court and the procedure for interlocutory appeals must be followed. [Cit.]’ [Cit.]” *All Risk Ins. Agency v. Rockbridge Sanitation Co.,*166 Ga. App. 728 (305 SE2d 390) (1983). In dismissing the claim against Travelers, the trial court did not make such a determination. Thus, inasmuch as the claim against the alleged tortfeasor remains pending below, the order sought to be appealed is not directly appealable. See generally OCGA § 5-6-34 (a); *Coley Fertilizer Co. v. Gold Kist,*174 Ga. App. 471 (330 SE2d 597) (1985). The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Birdsong and Cooper, JJ., concur.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9003 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to recognize the Women-Owned 

Small Business program in the Department of Veterans Affairs procurement hierarchy of small business preferences, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2024 

Mrs. CHAVEZ-DEREMER (for herself, Ms. HOYLE of Oregon, Mr. 

GOTTHEIMER, Mr. COSTA, and Ms. ROSS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to recognize the 

Women-Owned Small Business program in the Department of Veterans Affairs procurement hierarchy of small 

business preferences, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Affairs Op5 portunity for Women-Owned Small Businesses Act of 

6 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9003 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS 

2 PROGRAM IN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

3 AFFAIRS PROCUREMENT HIERARCHY OF 

4 SMALL BUSINESS PREFERENCES. 

5 Section 8127(h) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (3)— 

8 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; 

9 or’’ and inserting a semicolon; 

10 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

11 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; 

12 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

13 subparagraph: 

14 ‘‘(C) section 8(m) of the Small Business Act 

15 (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).’’; and 

16 (D) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 

17 through (C) as clauses (i) through (iii), respec18 tively; 

19 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through 

20 (4) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively; 

21 (3) in the matter before subparagraph (A), as 

22 redesignated by paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ 

23 before ‘‘Preferences for’’; and 

24 (4) by adding at the end the following new 

25 paragraph (2): 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9003 IH

1 ‘‘(2) All preferences described in subparagraph (C) 

2 of paragraph (1) shall be afforded the same degree of pri3 ority under such paragraph.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32



                           Section 1350 Certifications

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
         TransNet Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify to such officer's
         knowledge that:

     1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period
         ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations
         of the Company.





     /S/ STEVEN J. WILK
     -----------------------
     Steven J. Wilk
     Chief Executive Officer

     Date:  May 14, 2007


     /S/ JOHN J. WILK
     -----------------------
     John J. Wilk
     Chief Financial Officer

     Date: May 14, 2007
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# America the beautiful: South Dakota

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  America the beautiful: South Dakota 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Windbreak of trees, Sully County soil and water conservation district 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Agriculture 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1960-1970 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  South Dakota 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  150 × 60 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  A57.8-2.So8d.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Th~ f'{on"orabt~ ~£~¥LaHood 

S'e,~retar:r 

U.$~. Q~partm~nt ofTri!lt'ISportatlon 

40(l,yttt.street, sw Room 10200 

Washington#. D.c •. 20590 

D'earSecretary LaHood: 

i! : L! 

1 am.wrttingtoshow my support forth.e appHeatiOn for Small Community Air Servi~e 

Development G:rant.l.share the AIrport's 'goal of attracting affordable,. tonventef!lt air s~icffto 

out c:ommunlty, helping foster business and.lndustrv g.rowtl:k 

comme.r~la.l Air $ervi~e atQ:utagamle 'to:ul)ty·Alrp:ort IS:~Uf;ferio~rafter loSil'lfS;tbe tJnJtedAirJine 

ft!Shtto l)~nver<d'!Jrlngth:e economic dov1mtqrn and. Fronti.er Alrlin~s dls<::ontin.ulngsli!rvice tQ 

Mltwauk~e. last year. these seats were erlticalln our market:af\d we need tq baekfillthe Joss .. ecf 

cap~n:ity .. 

Alr service into ATW direqly affects meeting planner mHt traveler decisions! 

1. 'JheRadtssonP~petValfey··Hoteteompetesfottonventi'i:l'n ahdgr<:supbusinessat'l h()th a 

regionaf and natlol1al t~vel. Meeting:p;fann.ells faetor imo.thelrdeasioh'-makihg the flight 

schedtlles and fates in/out ofATW .. Gur current: service level puts us at atompetltiVe 

disadvantage against other cities. 

:t·~ Trav~ter.s make ded$ions on wbetherto attend meetirrgs;ba"sed on air service• fJ.S an 

exampte,.lastweeka national firm based}n Appleton haiti t!'letr arntoa.l sates team. program. 

at Ol.fr hoteL 70 distributors from across the LJS quat.~fJed and were invited to: tbe meeting. 

Only ~5 attended, Tl'te other 3Scho.se not to attend;either be<::at~se the a1riare JAto AtW 

was too high, or the time and exp.ense offlylng into MKE and driving to Ap.pleton was more 

tha.n they could afford. 

The Presence of atdditional se.rvite at.Out:agam1e Count¥ Airport~ A1W~ w:ould;pla~ta pivotal role 

fn lfddresslng:thetranspcnfatlon.needs oro.ur c:ornmunttv andbenefitn¢t ontythJa C:lty of 

Appleton and autagamie County~ but.Northeast Wls¢o.nsin as ~el{. 

I asktbatyou give this grant applieation y(}ur most thoughtful and. serious consideration. 

Radisson P;q:>er Valley Hot~J 

333 We'f,t College Avenue ,.. Appleton;.WI54911 

T~eph\:lM:9:20.73~,:$000··• F<iX:920~733i9z20
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection

[CBP Dec. 07-18]


Re-Approval of Inspecorate America Corporation as a Commercial 
Gauger

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of re-approval of Inspectorate America Corporation of 
Freeport, Texas, as a commercial gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13 
Inspectorate America Corporation, 1331 North Avenue I, Suite E, 
Freeport, Texas 77541, has been re-approved to gauge petroleum and 
petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone 
wishing to employ this entity for gauger services should request and 
receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by the 
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger 
service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific 
gauger services this entity is approved to perform may be directed to 
the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. 
The inquiry may also be sent to http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/ 
operations--support/labs--scientific--svcs/org--and--operations.xml.

DATES: The re-approval of Inspectorate America Corporation as a 
commercial gauger became effective on September 7, 2006. The next 
triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene J. Bondoc, Ph.D, or Randall 
Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, Bureau of Customs and 
Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, 
Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: April 6, 2007.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E7-6902 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARREN A COMAN, II,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:12-cr-31

Judge Peter C. Economus

ORDER

There being no objections, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Dkt. 11) that Defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts 

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, on which Defendant is hereby adjudged 

guilty. Decision on acceptance or rejection of the plea agreement is deferred for consideration 

after the preparation of a presentence investigation report. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/s/ Peter C. Economus - May 15, 2012

Case: 2:12-cr-00031-PCE-EPD Doc #: 14 Filed: 05/15/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Before the Third Division,

November 27, 1951

No. 56081.

protests 172442-K, etc. (New York).

#### Morad Aminoff et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 46863.

#### Protests 18383-K, etc., of American Express Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From an examination of the papers the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the -presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protests were therefore overruled.
(Reap. Dec. 9765)

#### Sears, Roebuck and Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 147-D; 192-D.

*460(Decided August 10, 1960)

*Lane, Young é Fox*for tlie plaintiff.

*George Oochran Daub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tlie defendant.

OlxveR, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement are before me for decision on a written stipulation of submission, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court, that tbe merchandise covered by tbe above appeals for reappraisement consists of bamboo blinds and sets of hardware accessories imported from Japan; and that each bamboo blind, as invoiced, is accompanied by one set of hardware accessories.

> That on or about tbe dates of exportation of tbe merchandise hereinbefore described, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, at the appraised unit values, packed; that said unit values include the cost of the sets of hardware accessories, which cost is 3 cents (U.S. Oy) per set of hardware accessories; and that there was no higher foreign value.

> That the above appeals for reappraisement are limited to the merchandise hereinbefore described and are abandoned as to all other merchandise; and that said appeals may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised unit values, packed, which unit values include the cost of the sets of hardware accessories, costing 3 cents (United States currency) per set of hardware accessories.

As to all other merchandise, these appeals for reappraisement are dismissed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
ex10-9.htm


    Exhibit
10.9

     

    COLUMBIA
UNIVERSITY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY VENTURES

     

    FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE LICENSE AGREEMENT OF

     

    FEBRUARY
1, 2005 BETWEEN COLUMBIA AND OMNIMMUNE CORP.

     

    March 29,
2005

     

    Harris A.
Lichtenstein, Ph.D.

    President
and CEO

    Omnimmune Corp.

    4600 Post
Oak Place

    Suite
152

    Houston,
Texas 77027

    


    Dear
Harris:

    


    The
Agreement between Omnimmune Corp. and The Trustees of Columbia University in the
City of New York, dated February 1, 2005 (“Agreement”),
is hereby amended as follows:

    


    
      	
              1.  
         

            	
              Section
      17 (a) is amended to read as
follows:

            


    

    


    a.  This
Agreement shall be effective as of the date first recited above and shall
continue in full force and effect until its expiration or termination in
accordance with this Section 17; provided however that if the Stock Purchase
Agreement or the Stockholders Agreement involving Columbia and
Omnimmune is not fully executed within 120 days of the effective date of
this Agreement, then this Agreement is null and void.

    


    All other
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect, except as expressly amended herein.

    


    Please
indicate your agreement to the Letter Amendment by signing where indicated
below, and returning one original signed Letter to my attention.

    


    Very
truly yours,

    


    /s/
Scot G.
Hamilton                             


    Scot G.
Hamilton

    Senior
Director

    Science
and Technology Ventures

    The
Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York

     

    AGREED
AND ACKNOWLEDGED:

    


    OMNIMMUNE
CORP.

    


    By:/s/ Harris A.
Lichtenstein             
   
                                                             

    President
& CEO

    


    Date:3/29/05
No. 55400.

#### A. S. Beck Shoe Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 149956-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

RANDY POLLOCK,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00114

v. Judge Algenon L. Marbley

Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

SHERIFF GEORGE LAVENDER, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the February 1, 2012 Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 21.) The Magistrate Judge recommended

that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11) and dismiss

Plaintiff’s claims without prejudice.

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties

that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a

“waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the

judgment of the District Court.” (Report & Recommendation 7, ECF No. 21.) The time period

for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. No party has objected to

the Report and Recommendation. 

The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 

Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired,

the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,

Case: 2:11-cv-00114-ALM-EPD Doc #: 23 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims

are DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DATED: February 27, 2012

2

Case: 2:11-cv-00114-ALM-EPD Doc #: 23 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>