alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CC - Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report for Black Diamond Brands Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned, Bradley J. Moynes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. Moynes, Director, Vice President do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

					
	 

	 

	(1) 

	 

	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934; and  


	 

	 

	 

	 

	         


	 


	 

	 

	(2) 

	 

	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 


	 

	 

	 

	 

	        


	 


	By: 

	 

	 

	 

	 


	 


	 

	 

	 

	 

	/s/ Bradley J. Moynes       


	 

	 

	 

	 

	Bradley J. Moynes 


	 

	 

	 

	 

	Chief Executive Officer 


	 

	 

	 

	 

	August 8, 2008 


	 


	 


	 

	 

	 

	 

	 /s/ James R. Moynes        


	 

	 

	 

	 

	James R. Moynes


	 

	 

	 

	 

	Director, Vice President


	 

	 

	 

	 

	August 8, 2008
Case No. 6,444.

#### GILMAN v. KING et al.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 48.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1812.

Bh.ls axd Notes — Law of Place Wheue Negotiable — Indorsee as Witness for Makek.

1. A promissory note made in Georgetown, D. C., in the year 1S10, payable to C. L. Nevitt or order, at GO days, “negotiable in the Bank of Alexandria,” is governed by the laws in force in Alexandria; and the holder in an action against the maker, must allow all just discounts against the payee before notice of the assignment given to the maker.

2. An indorser is a competent witness for the maker of a note, to prove that the indorsement was without consideration, and to give credit to the note, but the payee is not a competent witness for the plaintiff.

Assumpsit upon the promissory note of A. King and Company, dated September 7, 1S10, at sixty days, payable to C. L. Nevitt or order, “negotiable at the Bank of Alexandria,” indorsed by Nevitt to Preston, and by Preston to the plaintiff. The defendant claimed to discount C. L. Nevitt’s note to him, under the Virginia law of the 4th of December, T7SG, § 4, pp. 30, 37, by which .the assignee is bound to allow the defendant all just discounts before notice of the assignment.

E. J. Lee, for plaintiff,

contended that by the 19th section of the act of congress “concerning the bank of Alexandria” (2 Stat G25), such a note, when indorsed, was to be considered as a bill of exchange, and as governed by the laws applicable to that species of mercantile instruments. But it was discovered that the printer had misrepresented the date of that act, February 15, 1810, instead -of 1811, which was subsequent to the *406dato of tlie note, and therefore could not affect its character for negotiability.

Mr. Lee and Mr. Taylor

then contended that the note was to be governed and construed by the law of the place where it was made, and cited Robinson v. Bland, 2 Burrows, 1077; Stapleton v. Conway, 3 Atk. 727; 1 Eq. Cas. Abr. 2SS, 289; Melan v. Duke Do Fitzjames, 1 Bos. & P. 142; Talleyrand v. Boulanger, 3 Ves. 449; Holman v. Johnson, Cowp. 343; and Alves v. Hodgson, 7 Term R. 241.

Mr. Swann and Mr. Jones, for defendant,

cited Robinson v. Bland, 2 Burrows, 1077; Norton v. Rose, 2 Wash. [Va.] 233; Lord Ranelaugh v. Champant, 1 Eq. Cas. Abr. 2S9.

THE COURT

(nem. con.) considered the note of A. King & Co. as an Alexandria contract, and suffered the note of C. L. Nevitt to be given in evidence by the defendant .as a discount.

THE COURT permitted Preston, the in-dorser, to be examined as a witness for the defendant to prove that he (Preston) indorsed without consideration to give credit to the note; and refused to admit C. L. Nev-itt, the payee, as a witness for the plaintiff, because, if the plaintiff succeeded, the witness would be discharged from his liability.

The verdict was for the defendant, and THE COURT (nem. con.) refused a new trial, after argument.
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the annual report of First Titan Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Sydney Jim, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: January 13, 2016BY: /s/ Sydney JimSydney JimChief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Finance and Accounting Officer and Sole Director   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2008077EN.01000101.xml

| 28.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 March 2008

(2008/C 77/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5786 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4588 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78290 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3937 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5688 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 118,52 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0170 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,383 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 256,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6966 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,5256 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,7165 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 32,556 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0004 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7088 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6085 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,2837 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9590 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1790 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 558,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,6095 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 11,0668 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2586 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 523,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0665 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,017 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 37,0850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,544 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7275 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8760 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5786

JPY

Japanese yen

157,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4588

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78290

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3937

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5688

ISK

Iceland króna

118,52

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0170

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,383

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

256,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6966

PLN

Polish zloty

3,5256

RON

Romanian leu

3,7165

SKK

Slovak koruna

32,556

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0004

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7088

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6085

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,2837

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9590

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1790

KRW

South Korean won

1 558,47

ZAR

South African rand

12,6095

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

11,0668

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2586

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 523,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0665

PHP

Philippine peso

66,017

RUB

Russian rouble

37,0850

THB

Thai baht

49,544

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7275

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8760

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2008166EN.01002101.xml

| 1.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/21

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5197 — HP/EDS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 166/07)

| 1. | On 19 June 2008, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Hewlett-Packard Company (‘HP’, USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Electronic Data Systems Corporation (‘EDS’, USA) by way purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 19 June 2008, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Hewlett-Packard Company (‘HP’, USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Electronic Data Systems Corporation (‘EDS’, USA) by way purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for HP: provision of information technology solutions to consumers, business and governments, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for HP: provision of information technology solutions to consumers, business and governments,

| — | for EDS: provision of information technology services to business and governments. |
| --- | --- |

—

for EDS: provision of information technology services to business and governments.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5197 — HP/EDS, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5197 — HP/EDS, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,804-02

EX PARTE JOHNNY RAY MULDROW, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 25549 HC-2 IN THE 6TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM LAMAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Muldrow v. State, No. 06-14-00103-CR (Tex. App. — Texarkana, Jan. 9,

2015) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

1

This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit. 1
2

because trial counsel failed to perform an adequate pre-trial investigation, failed to interview and call

witnesses, and refused to allow Applicant to testify on his own behalf. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the

appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
3

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 11, 2017

Do not publish
# Qlante**~oran** March 19,2010 The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington t DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: On behalfofPlante &, Moran, PLLC, I am writing to express our strong support for the

... application ofDelta Air.Lines**for:n~w** oonstop,sewice between, Detroit and Haneda.

: ,:. t j.'**~",** " .;t I " (': ," '- ,; > :: , ' Approval**ofDelta~s** 

## new service woUld 00 

## a major benefit for our region, where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are almost 250 Japanese companies located in Indiana and hundreds more whose business activities rely on access to Japan and its market. The growth ofour business ties with Japan has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Indiana corporate representatives look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. Indianapolis 

### does not offer international service to Asia, and many ofour business travelers uSe Detroit 

## as their hub when flying to Japan. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to 'Asia and is an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airline's gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit 

### that would clearly benefit our region.

.Thank .you for consideration ofthis. f(!Quest. Sincerely,

, ,**"~~".~.'** ;'"**~~** • t \', " -.,' .., . Robb Rose,' Parlrtet' ! ; P18nte & Motan,Pt..LC

, !,,' .'

, , ",
" .'

.

# ..'.
" . 

## Prsxity:**lJi;~¥f:HP** II>**';~ ~\**  ,j:,': .:;: LL<,,·h_" ..**i}~** \1h(**t'J?l;J~l',\'l'** 1,ifi;/";
Order entered July 8 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00799
- CV
IN RE KAJIN SHAMDEEN , Relator
O riginal Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 003
- 02757
- 2019

O RDER On February 2, 2 021, this Court issued an order explaining that this matter
will remain abated until June 30 , 2021 , unless any party shows by prompt motion
that the receivership cou rt has extended the stay. Because the parties have not
advised us tha t the receivership has exte nded the stay , we LIFT the abatement and
REI NSTATE this original proceeding. The response , if any, to the petition for writ of mandamus shall be filed
WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS

. / s / AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
**Exhibit
      32.2**














**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**









I,
      Jeffrey T. Fisher, the Chief Financial Officer of CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital
      Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that,
      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
      2007 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:




|· | fully
              complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|· | the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------








/s/
      Jeffrey T.
      Fisher


Jeffrey
      T. Fisher


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


May
      15,
      2007
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Pathway to fishing: F (fish) + L (location) + P (presentation) = S (success)

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Pathway to fishing: F (fish) + L (location) + P (presentation) = S (success) 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  199 × 70 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  I49.2.F53.27.KIT.FLPS.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 4, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0544

Lower Tribunal No. 16-15912

________________

M.B., the Father,

Appellant,

vs.

Department of Children and Families, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos 

Lopez, Judge.

Joyce Law, P.A., and Richard F. Joyce, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, for appellee Department of Children and Families; 

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. Lee, 

Senior Attorney, Appellate Division (Tallahassee), for appellee Guardian ad 

Litem.

Before EMAS, SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.