alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[111th Congress Public Law 326]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 3556]]

Public Law 111-326
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To designate the airport traffic control tower located at Spokane 
International Airport in Spokane, Washington, as the ``Ray Daves Airport 
    Traffic Control Tower''. <<NOTE: Dec. 22, 2010 -  [H.R. 5591]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The airport traffic control tower located at Spokane International 
Airport in Spokane, Washington, and any successor airport traffic 
control tower at that location, shall be known and designated as the 
``Ray Daves Airport Traffic Control Tower''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the airport traffic control tower 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ray 
Daves Airport Traffic Control Tower''.

    Approved December 22, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5591:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111-611 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 65660.

#### Perry Bayliss Wiley (U.S.A.), Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/27688 and 60/30560 (New York).

*491Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle tires the same in- all material respects as the automobile tires the subject of A. *N. Deringer, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 327, C.D. 1882), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
No. 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the “Trust”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David M.
Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Trust, certifies, to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.







TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST(Registrant)Date:  November
      5, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      David M. PetersonDavid
      M. Peterson, Assistant General Agent
              and
      Chief Financial Officer
Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 1 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 2 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 3 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 4 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 5 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 6 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 7 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 8 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 9 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 10 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 11 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 12 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00460-GLF-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 13 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T14:48:08-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
A90A0124.

#### RANKIN v. THE STATE.

(394 SE2d 142)

Decided May 4, 1990.

*Patrick G. Longhi,*for appellant.

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Katherine Beaver, Joseph J. Drolet, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

Cooper, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction by a jury of robbery and the resulting sentence. At trial, the victim and her sister, an eyewitness, testified that the appellant followed them from a bus down a path between two apartment complexes, where the appellant grabbed the victim, struggled with her on the ground and took money from her. The two girls testified as to the clothing worn by the appellant and his description and picked his photograph out of a display soon after the incident occurred. The police officers testified as to his clothing, the money found on the appellant in the amount the victim stated was taken from her, the events surrounding the robbery, and the subsequent struggle in which the appellant was shot by a police officer. The appellant was the only witness for the defense and gave testimony which contradicted that of the witnesses for the State. “A fair analysis of the evidence in support of the [conviction] of the [offense] charged satisfies this court that there was a sufficient quantum of credible evidence to satisfy any rational jury of reasonable persons of the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. [Cit.]” *Myers v. State,*184 Ga. App. 618 (1) (362 SE2d 92) (1987).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Banke, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.*
Case: 2:10-cv-00131-MHW-NMK Doc #: 63 Filed: 04/10/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T15:19:36-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
- FPL_1505ocr-1
- FPL_1505ocr-2
- FPL_1505ocr-3
- FPL_1505ocr-4
- FPL_1505ocr-5
- FPL_1505ocr-6
- FPL_1505ocr-7
- FPL_1505ocr-8
- FPL_1505ocr-9
- FPL_1505ocr-10
- FPL_1505ocr-11
- FPL_1505ocr-12
- FPL_1505ocr-13
- FPL_1505ocr-14
- FPL_1505ocr-15
- FPL_1505ocr-16
- FPL_1505ocr-17
- FPL_1505ocr-18
- FPL_1505ocr-19
- FPL_1505ocr-20
- FPL_1505ocr-21
- FPL_1505ocr-22
Exhibit 32.1

March 12,
2015
Via EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Annual Report of VOC Energy Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust,
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as
a separate disclosure document.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,
Trustee for VOC Energy TrustBy

/s/ MICHAEL J. ULRICH Michael J. Ulrich Vice President


---



QuickLinks
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

CERTAIN COMMERCIAL AIR CONDITIONING, HEATING, AND WATER

HEATING EQUIPMENT

( i.e. , CERTAIN EQUIPMENT IN ASHRAE STANDARD 9 0.1

- 2010)

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Room 8E

- 089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties on the

notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) addressing energy conserv ation standards for certain ASHRAE

Standard 90.1 equipment.



## Agenda

9:00

– 9:30 am Welcome and Introductions

Doug Brookman

9:30

– 9:45 am Introduction, Overview , and Opening Remarks from Interested Parties

Mohammed Khan

Summary of the statutory background and rulemaking process.

9:45

– 10: 30 am Determination of Scope and Test Procedures

Adam Darlington

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used for the

determination of scope and test procedur e revisions

10: 30

– 1 0 : 45 am Break

1 0 : 45

– 11: 30 am Market Assessment and Engineering Analysis

Knute Svenson

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors

considered for the market assessment and engineering analysis

11: 30

– 12: 15 p m Markups Analysis; Energy Use Analysis; Life

- Cycle Costs and Payback

Period AnalysisMichael Scott and Dave Winiarski

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors

considered for the markups to determine equipment price analysis, energy use

analysis, and life

- cycle cost and payback period analysis.

12: 15

– 1 : 15 pm Lunch

1 : 15

– 1 : 45 pm Shipments Analysis; National Impact Analysis; Utility Impact and

Emissions Impact Analysis

Alison Williams

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors

considered for the shipments analysis, n ational impact analysis, utility impact

analysis, and emissions impact analysis

.

1:45

– 2 : 1 5 pm Certification, Compliance & Enforcement

Ashley Armstrong

Summary presentation and discussion regarding certification, compliance, and

enforcement actions for ASHRAE equipment

.

2 : 1 5

– 2:3 0 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks

Mohammed Khan
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 15



Board of Directors
Texas Industries, Inc.



We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment
Number 9 to Registration Statement Number 2-48986 on Form S-8, Registration
Statement Number 33-53715 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Number 333-
11604 on Form S-8 of Texas Industries, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of
our report dated March 20, 2001, relating to the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements of Texas Industries, Inc. which are
included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2001.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not part of
the Registration Statement prepared or certified by accountants within the
meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.



                                         /s/  Ernst & Young LLP
                                         ----------------------




April 11, 2001
Dallas, Texas

                                     -21-
Exhibit 13.1





906 Certification







June 27, 2011








The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.




James Jinshan Hong, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chi Hon Tsang, the Chief Financial Officer of Zuoan Fashion Limited, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Himax Technologies, Inc.







By:
/s/ James Jinshan HongName:
James Jinshan HongTitle:
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




By:
/s/ Chi Hon TsangName:
Chi Hon TsangTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 1417 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 159

-AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

777 PAX Removal and reinstall 16.0 $1,360.0 0 $0 $1,360.00 150 $204,000.00 777F Removal and reinstall 4.0 $ 340.00 $0 $ 340.00 11 $3,740.00 Replace packboard assembly 0.5 $ 42.50 $137 $ 179.50 75 $13,462.50 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $221,203 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 

### $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special consideratio **ns f or Economic Analysis**  ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### For replacement cost: all 777F are under warranty (2 009 or newer). Estimated that 1/2 of the US 777 pax

fleet will be under warranty. **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Get inside the great outdoors, access to your national forests

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Get inside the great outdoors, access to your national forests 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Forest Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 91-640-P. "April 1991." "FS 482." 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2007170EN.01003401.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/34

---

Action brought on 29 May 2007 — Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v OHIM — Zafra Marroquineros (CK CREACIONES KENNYA)

(Case T-185/07)

(2007/C 170/66)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Calvin Klein Trademark Trust (Delaware, United States) (represented by: T. Andrade Boué, M.I. Lehmann Novo and A. Hernández Lehmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Zafra Marroquineros, S.L.

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | annulment of the contested decision of 29 March 2007 in Case R 314/2006-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of the contested decision of 29 March 2007 in Case R 314/2006-2;

| — | rejection of Community word mark No 3 386 604 CK CREACIONES KENNYA; |
| --- | --- |

—

rejection of Community word mark No 3 386 604 CK CREACIONES KENNYA;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs including those of the intervener. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs including those of the intervener.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Zafra Marroquineros, S.L.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘CK CREACIONES KENNYA’ for goods in Classes 18 and 25 (application No 3.386.604).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Primarily the Community figurative mark ‘CK Calvin Klein’ (mark No 66.712) for goods and services in Classes 3, 4, 8, 9, 14, 16, 20, 21, 24-27, 35 and 42 and the national marks ‘CK’ for goods in Classes 18 and 25.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) since there exists a likelihood of confusion between the marks in dispute and the mark ‘CK’ is well known.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
Delma & Christine Bennett 

Mossville Environmental Action Now, Inc. 

Statement to the EPA 

EP A Public Hearing on Proposed Rule for 

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Polyvinyl 

Chloride and Copolymers Production 

June 9, 2011 

We are here today representing Mossville Environmental Action Now, a 

community organization that is dedicated to achieving our right to 

environmental justice. 

We suffer from the cancer-causing chemicals from these facilities on a 

daily basis, which includes dioxins. Mossville residents have an average 

blood-dioxin level that is 3 times the national average. Research by 

Wilma Subra, one of the best environmental scientists in our country, 

shows that the dioxins in our blood are the same kind of dioxins released 

by the industrial facilities near Mossville. Her research is in the report, 

Industrial Sources of Dioxin Poisoning in Mossville, LA, which was 

featured in a special news broadcast on CNN last June titled "Toxic 

America." 

Our organization won a lawsuit against the EPA because the first 

regulation it planned to issue for the PVC industry did not comply with 

the Clean Air Act. This lawsuit was important to us because our 

community of Mossville has the largest concentration of vinyl 

manufacturers in the United States. 

When EP A came to us to ask for more time to prepare an effective air 

pollution regulation the PVC industry we agreed. Unfortunately, this 
proposed regulation creates too many exemptions for the PVC industry. 

This regulation is contrary to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson's 

commitment to environmental justice, and, more importantly, continues 

to ignore our human right to a healthy environment. 

Sections of the proposed regulation make vinyl chloride the surrogate 

for all of the other hazardous air pollutants, which includes dioxins. 

Each pollutant should have emission limits and procedures that achieve 

reductions. 

There are also rules that set the bar so high that no PVC facility is 

required to meet any of the proposed regulations for storage vessels, 

wastewater, and maximum control technology for process vents. 

The proposed rule leaves our community vulnerable to continued 

exposure to the toxic chemicals released by PVC facilities. 

We are also disturbed by the methodology EP A uses to disregard the 

fact that African Americans in Mossville, Louisiana are 

disproportionately burdened with toxic pollution. EPA should be 

working to end environmental injustice, not hide it. 

For these reasons, M.E.A.N. urges the EPA to improve the proposed rule 

by setting maximum reductions for each hazardous air pollutant and 

ensuring that Mossville residents and all other affected people are not 

harmed by the PVC industry. 

Thank you.