alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-05-1998
<CASH>                                          59,909
<SECURITIES>                                    51,692
<RECEIVABLES>                                  288,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (27,920)
<INVENTORY>                                    400,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               823,155
<PP&E>                                       1,098,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                 517,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,076,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          369,139
<BONDS>                                        585,580
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       324,845
<OTHER-SE>                                     676,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,076,136
<SALES>                                        501,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               501,264
<CGS>                                          343,179
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (8,944)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,147
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,282
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,282
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

JACK HAFNER,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00669

v. Judge James L. Graham

Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

K. RUMER, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the April 25, 2011 Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 15.) The Magistrate Judge recommended

that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) and dismiss Plaintiff’s claims

with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties

that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a “waiver

of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment

of the District Court.” (Report & Recommendation 3, ECF No. 15.) The time period for filing

objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. No party has objected to the Report

and Recommendation. 

The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers. Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for

filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the

Case: 2:11-cv-00669-JLG-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 06/01/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED and

this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

S/ James L. Graham 

James L. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Date: June 1, 2012

2

Case: 2:11-cv-00669-JLG-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 06/01/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
(Reap. Dec. 9764)

#### G. C. Murphy Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 723306.

(Decided August 4, 1960)

*J ohn D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*George Goehr an Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND. AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the date of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, chinaware, manufactured in and exported from Japan to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised unit value, less the buying commission stated in the invoice.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise at the date of exportation thereof as defined in Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, effective February 27, 1958, T.D. 54521, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that such value is the appraised unit value, less the buying commission stated in the invoice.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION OF 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009 (the Report), I, Melvin G. Brekhus,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: January 7, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Melvin G. Brekhus                
|                       |  |  |  | Melvin G. Brekhus                    
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 2, 2010 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with
the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2010-4 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial
Company Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS Sensub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from November 2, 2010 through
December 31, 2010, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ James Fehleison             |  |  |  | Dated: March 28, 2011
|                                     |  | James Fehleison                 |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
No. 49824.

#### Protest 104039-K of E. Miltenberg, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the hearing the importer testified that he had examined personally every importation of ivory made by his company and that the ivory in the shipment in question is just the same as he had received in other shipments. A sample of the importation was not available but an illustrative exhibit marked “A” was admitted in evidence showing the vertically cut cross section and the ring dividing the ivory from the so-called bark, and as far as the witness was able to testify the ivory in question was about the same as said illustrative exhibit. On cross-examination he stated he could not remember whether he had examined the tusks in question before he received notice that duty had been assessed, stating that the shipment had come in almost 3 years prior, and further that the question of duty had never been raised before. The examiner who advisorily classified the merchandise testified, among other things, that he recalled having examined the tusks in question and positively stated that the articles he examined did have the bark partially removed. In view of the fact that the importer did not display a positive assurance that the ivory at issue was in the condition of having its “bark left intact,” and the testimony of the Government examiner who was positive that he remembered this particular ship*316ment and that the bark of the ivory tusks was partially removed, the court was of the opinion that the presumption of correctness attached to the collector’s classification had not been overcome. The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer  of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I,
Michael M. Nuzzo, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GNC Holdings, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
October 17, 2012

/s/ MICHAEL M. NUZZO Michael M. Nuzzo Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Case Wo. 13,912.

#### THOMAS v. SUMMERS.

[5 Cranch, C. C. 434.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term. 1838.

Judgment — Supkusedeas—Indorsement.

A justice of the peace cannot issue an execution, as on a supersedeas, upon the mere indorsement on the back of the original judgment, that it was superseded.

Appeal from the award of execution by a justice of the peace, upon a supposed super-sedeas. The only evidence of a confession of judgment by way of supersedeas, according to the act of assembly of Maryland, was an indorsement on the back of the original warrant, upon which the original judgment *974was entered, that It was superseded by Amelia Thomas, the appellant, and a similar entry on the justice’s docket. Reversed (nem. con.).

Mr. Hoban, for plaintiff.

Mr. Redin, for defendant [Owen Summers].

THUUSTON, Circuit Judge,

said that if there had been evidence that diligent séarch had been made among the deceased justice’s papers for the regular certificate of the confession of judgment, he should think the indorsement of the justice sufficient.
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-178271) of China Zenix Auto International
Limited of our reports dated April 28, 2014 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of China Zenix Auto International Limited and its subsidiaries (the Group) (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the convenience translation of Renminbi amounts into United States dollar amounts) and the effectiveness of the Groups internal control over financial reporting, appearing
in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Zenix Auto International Limited for the year ended December 31, 2013.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
|                            
|Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu    
|Hong Kong                   
|April 28, 2014
# C_2007169EN.01001601.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/16

---

DECISION

DECISION

(2007/C 169/05)

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities, laid down by Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004, and in particular to Article 30 of the Staff Regulations,

having regard to the Bureau decision on determining the Appointing Authority, as last amended on 26 October 2004,

having regard to Notice of Open Competition EUR/A/151,

having regard to the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meeting of 27 June 2007,

HAS DECIDED

Sole Article

The period of validity of the reserve list for Open Competition EUR/A/151 shall be extended until 31 August 2007.

31 August 2007

Luxembourg, 9 July 2007.

The Secretary-General

Harald RØMER

---
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 6440, styled Leonardo G. Flores, Jr. v. Thomas Energy

Services, Inc. D/B/A Thomas Tools and Blas Castillo, Jr., pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County,

Texas, the Honorable Jose A. Lopez presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00361-CV

IN RE THOMAS ENERGY SERVICES, INC., D/B/A THOMAS TOOLS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 24, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 17, 2009, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary

relief for emergency stay of order compelling discovery. The court has considered relator’s petition

for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for temporary relief are DENIED.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

 PER CURIAM
C:\Users\eric.lovett\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet 

Files\Content.Outlook\LBTFTFGW\Errata_Sheet_VHB_Draft_FRA.docx

All Aboard Florida Intercity Passenger Rail Project

Draft Environmental Impact Statement and 

Section 4(f) Evaluation

ERRATA and CLARIFICATIONS

FRA has identified several statements in the DEIS which require correction or clarification at this time in 

order to facilitate public review of the document. Other minor errors, typographic errors, or corrections 

will be addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement.

DEIS Page Issue Clarification

3-26 Positive Train Control –

No-Action Alternative

The DEIS states that PTC would be implemented as part of 

the No-Action Alternative as required by FRA regulations to 

implement a new signal system that will provide positive 

train control (PTC) for all Class 1 railroads by 2015 (49 CFR 

Part 229). FECR is rated as a Class 2 railroad and is 

therefore not required to implement PTC until 2020.

3-41 Operation of the West 

Palm Beach VMF

The DEIS incorrectly states that the West Palm Beach Vehicle 

Maintenance Facility would be discontinued and all 

maintenance operations would take place at the Orlando VMF, 

once Phase II is in service. The West Palm Beach facility (as 

evaluated in the separate Supplemental Environmental 

Assessment available for public review and comment at 

http://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0726) would continue to 

provide maintenance and overnight layover services at the 

south end of the project corridor in Phase II.

5-39 Noise The DEIS incorrectly states that AAF has committed to installing 

stationary wayside horns at each of the 159 grade crossings 

between Cocoa and West Palm Beach where severe, 

unmitigated impacts would occur using locomotive-mounted 

horns. AAF has committed to installing wayside horns at each 

of the 117 grade crossings where severe impacts would occur in 

the absence of mitigation.

7-3 Moveable Bridge 

Operations and Mitigation

The DEIS incorrectly states that AAF would develop a set 

schedule for the down times of each bridge location that will 

include both freight and passenger rail service. AAF will 

develop a set schedule for passenger rail service. However, 

AAF does not control FECR’s freight schedule. 

7-6 Quiet Zones The DEIS incorrectly states that AAF is committed to 

cooperating with local jurisdictions and funding the necessary 

improvements should they seek to establish quiet zones in 

lieu of pole-mounted horns. This commitment is revised to 

state that AAF has agreed to pay for safety improvement costs 

that would usually be borne by local governments such as 

four-quadrant gates or median barriers. This allows local 

governments to focus on finding the additional funding 

needed for the quiet zone improvements. AAF is committed 
C:\Users\eric.lovett\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet 

Files\Content.Outlook\LBTFTFGW\Errata_Sheet_VHB_Draft_FRA.docx

to working with all local governments as they proceed through 

the official Federal Railroad Administration quiet zone 

establishment process.
Advance Letter (E-Mail Text)

Dear <principal or superintendent name>, 

I am contacting you on behalf of the U.S. Department of Education to discuss an opportunity for 

<district or school name> to participate in a study aimed at preventing high school 

dropout. This study would provide access to the National High School Center’s Early 

Warning and Intervention Monitoring System (EWIMS) along with high-quality 

professional development technical support at no cost. The EWIMS process involves using 

data to identify at-risk students early in high school and assigning struggling students to 

interventions that get them back on track for on-time graduation. Conducted by the REL 

Midwest Regional Educational Laboratory at American Institutes for Research (AIR), the project 

will examine the impact of implementing EWIMS on a host of critical student outcomes 

(validated indicators of dropout, course performance, persistence and progress in school and 

likelihood of on-time graduation). In addition, the project will examine the impact of EWIMS on 

how schools make use of data to allocate limited dropout prevention resources. 

Attached please find a document that briefly describes the project. Our initial records indicate 

that your district/school may be eligible to participate in this project funded by the U.S. 

Department of Education’s Institutes for Educational Sciences. I would like to schedule a brief 

phone call with you to tell you more about the project, ascertain your interest in taking part, and 

to discuss whether this might be a great opportunity for <district or school name>.

Would you be able to touch base briefly by phone on <day>, <month> <date>? Please feel 

free to reach me by email or at 312-283-2318. 

Thank you and I look forward to speaking with you!

<name of project outreach recruiter>

<name of project outreach recruiter>

Project Outreach

On-Time Graduation Project

Midwest Regional Educational Laboratory

American Institutes for Research

20 North Wacker Drive, Suite 1231, Chicago, IL 60606

t: 312.283.2318 | www.air.org

Per the policies and procedures required by the Education Sciences Reform Act of 

2002, Title I, Part E, Section 183, responses to this data collection will be used only 

for statistical purposes. The reports prepared for this study will summarize findings 

across the sample and will not associate responses with a specific district or 

individual. Any willful disclosure of such information for nonstatistical purposes, 

except as required by law, is a class E felony.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Theaola Robinson v. The Walt Disney Company; ABC Television 

Network, Inc.; CC Texas Holding Co., Inc.; and KTRK Television, 

Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-14-00880-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-54895

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

On June 10, 2015, the Clerk of this Court received and filed appellant Theaola 

Robinson’s Appellant’s Brief and “Motion to Extend Time to File Court Brief 01-14-00880-

CV.” By her motion, Robinson states that she needs additional time to “copy the necessary 

number of briefs and submit other required information to the court” and requests a ten-day 

extension to file her brief with this Court. In her brief, Robinson states that appendix items A 

through K “will be submitted within ten days.” We construe Robinson’s motion as a motion 

requesting additional time within which to file an appendix to the brief and an additional copy of 

the brief. On June 19, 2015, Robinson filed an Amended Appellant’s Brief, which includes the 

appendix items. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.7. Accordingly, we dismiss as moot Robinson’s motion.

Appellees’ brief, if any, is due to be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this order. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 25, 2015