alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       OCT-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                            JUL-30-1999
<CASH>                                                        1,307
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                22,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  1,620
<INVENTORY>                                                  10,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             33,537
<PP&E>                                                       79,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                               58,169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               56,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        63,187
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                      8,859
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (45,886)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 56,961
<SALES>                                                      75,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             75,167
<CGS>                                                        71,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                77,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            6,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (7,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (7,516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (7,516)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (0.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (0.85)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THOMASTON MILLS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 3,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                           1,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                       563
<INVENTORY>                                     48,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,178
<PP&E>                                         253,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                 179,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,946
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,494
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,637
<SALES>                                        169,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,994
<CGS>                                          170,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,664)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5,751)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,913)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (2.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.28)


</TABLE>
No. 48677.

#### Protests 634370-G, etc., of Roethlisberger & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146 and 48269. The protests were therefore sustained.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries and Affiliated Entities



|                                                                                                                                 |  |                              
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiaries:                                                                                                                    |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Bitauto Hong Kong Limited                                                                                                        |  | Hong Kong                    
|Beijing Bitauto Internet Information Company Limited                                                                             |  | PRC                          
|                                                                                                                                 | 
|Special Purpose Entities:                                                                                                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Beijing Bitauto Information Technology Company Limited                                                                           |  | PRC                          
|Beijing C&I Advertising Company Limited                                                                                          |  | PRC                          
|Beijing Easy Auto Media Company Limited                                                                                          |  | PRC                          
|Beijing Brainstorm Advertising Company Limited                                                                                   |  | PRC                          
|Beijing New Line Advertising Company Limited                                                                                     |  | PRC                          
|Beijing Bitauto Interactive Advertising Company Limited                                                                          |  | PRC                          
|Beijing You Jie Information Company Limited                                                                                      |  | PRC                          
|Beijing Taoche Information Technology Company Limited (formerly known as You Jie Wei Ye (Beijing) Culture Media Company
Limited) |  | PRC                          
|Beijing BitOne Technology Company Limited                                                                                        |  | PRC                          
|Beijing Bit EP Information Technology Company Limited                                                                            |  | PRC                          
|Beijing Bitcar Interactive Information Technology Company Limited                                                                |  | PRC
Exhibit 32



                           Section 1350 Certifications

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
         TransNet Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify to such officer's
         knowledge that:

     1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period
         ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations
         of the Company.





     /s/ Steven J. Wilk
     -----------------------------
     Steven J. Wilk
     Chief Executive Officer

     Date:  November 14, 2006


     /s/ John J. Wilk
     -----------------------------
     John J. Wilk
     Chief Financial Officer

     Date:  November 14, 2006
Exhibit 32.2



TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Each of the
undersigned officers of Tampa Electric Company (the Company) certifies, under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: November 13, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ R. D. FaganRobert D. Fagan Chief Executive
Officer      
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 13, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ G. L. GilletteGordon L. Gillette Chief Financial
Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tampa Electric Company and will be retained by Tampa Electric Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 15.2



LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-175709 on Form S-8 of our reports dated June 29, 2012, relating
to the financial statements of Sky-mobi Limited (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the translation of Renminbi amounts to United States dollar amounts for the
convenience of readers in the United States of America), and the effectiveness of Sky-mobi Limiteds internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Sky-mobi Limited for the year ended March 31,
2012.

June 29, 2012

/s/ Deloitte
Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Swisher Hygiene Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William T. Nanovsky, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 30, 2015
By:
/s/William T. NanovskyWilliam T. NanovskySenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
SOFA Lifesavers

As a cross-industry collaboration for over 20 years, the SOFA Working Group has

identified the Possible Contributing Factors for more than 210 switching operations

fatalities since 1992. The SOFA Working Group reports its findings and emerging

data trends with the goal of zero fatalities in the railroad industry.

Share Knowledge ~ Save a Life ~ Zero Fatalities

When?

• Outdated “Industry Track Agreements” may allow conditions to become 

unsafe due to changes over time. Review of agreements is inconsistent 

across the railroad industry.

• Fatal collisions with motor vehicles while riding railroad equipment during 

a shove move over a grade crossing.

• An unfamiliar employee at an industrial property may not be aware of the 

industrial hazards. Job aids, such as maps usually do not exist. Training 

in plant characteristics may be inconsistent. 

What?

How?

1 in 5 switching operations fatalities

due to an industrial track hazard

Why Prevent Industry Hazards?

• An industry hazard includes cases where a structure, vehicle, or temporary 

obstruction on industrial track played a significant role in a switching 

operation fatality. It can include cases where the action of industrial plant 

employees played a role. 

Other 

Possible Contributing Factors

Industry Hazard

21%

• Prepare employees to identify and avoid industry hazards, such as: 

o Discuss the location and potential for industry hazards in job briefings.

o Assist employees with little or no familiarity with the location

physical characteristics, such as working with a person familiar 

with that location.

• Oversee and enforce industry track agreements. Agreements, practices, 

or policies should include the following provisions: 

o Maintenance of track and walkways.

o Removal of close/no clearance conditions.

o Marking of public and private industry road crossings clearly.

o Needs assessment for lighting installation and maintenance.

o Definition and control of the separation of road and plant vehicle 

operations from rail traffic. 

o Definition and control of the separation of non-railroad personnel 

from railroad switching operations.

o Notification to appropriate railroad personnel of a change

in conditions. 

üEmpower employees to stop work 

when hazards are identified that endanger 

the crew. Notify the proper authority 

immediately. Safety concerns must 

override the desire to complete a task.

üDismount equipment over grade crossings;

do not ride equipment through a grade 

crossing during a shove move. 

üInspect the work site before acting,

and job brief about any industry hazards.

üProvide job aids about industry hazards,

such as maps highlighting the hazards.

üShare near-miss & close-call experiences 

among employees and management.

Most Common Findings in Switching Operations Fatalities*

Inadequate 

Job Briefing

20%

Close / No 

Clearance

25%

Industry 

Hazard

21%

Struck by 

Mainline Train

17%

Inexperienced 

Employee

22%

*a SOFA case may have more than one PCF, thus the Most Common Findings total greater than 100%
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-202066) pertaining to the
2015 Stock Incentive Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan of Invitae Corporation of our report dated March 27, 2015, with respect to the financial statements
of Invitae Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2014.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP

Redwood
City, California
March 27, 2015

---



QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-CR-182

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

WILLIAM R. KISOR, II, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On October 5, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Count One

of the Information charging him with the knowing possession of visual depictions of child

pornography in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B). (Doc. 14). 

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Further, the Magistrate Judge observed that at the time Defendant entered his guilty plea, he was in

full possession of his faculties, was not suffering from any apparent physical or mental illness, and

was not under the influence of narcotics or alcohol.

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

Case: 2:12-cr-00182-GCS-NMK Doc #: 16 Filed: 11/08/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
not file any objections. 

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of this charge. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00182-GCS-NMK Doc #: 16 Filed: 11/08/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:12-cr-120

Juana Lugo-Aguilar 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 27) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and she

is hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: July 11, 2012 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cr-00120-JLG-NMK Doc #: 31 Filed: 07/11/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**Exhibit No. 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Roy Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

|               | TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST      |
|--------------------|-------------------------------|
|               | (Registrant)                  |
|               |
| Date:  May 4, 2007 | By:  /s/ Roy Thomas |
Exhibit 13.1



Certification by the Chief Executive
Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Transition Report
of Sky-mobi Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Tao Song, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April  27, 2015







|By: | /s/ Michael Tao Song |                        
|--- | -------------------- | -----------------------
|    | Name:                | Michael Tao Song       
|    | Title:               | Chief Executive Officer
October 2012 Recipient Reporting Timeline 

and Activities

Registration 

1 – 10 days 

after end of 

Quarter

15 – 16 days 

after end of 

Quarter

17 – 29 days 

after end of 

Quarter

30 days 

after end of 

Quarter

Prime & 

Sub 

Recipients 

Enter Draft 

Reporting 

Data 

Initial 

Submission 

2

Prime 

Recipients 

Review Data 

Submitted 

By Sub(s)

3

Prime & Sub 

Recipients 

Make 

Corrections

5

Agency 

Review of 

Data 

Submitted

Recipient 

Reports 

Published 

on 

Recovery.

gov

Prime & 

Sub 

Recipients 

Make 

Corrections 6

8

7

Agency Review Period

Ongoing

9

33 - 78 days 

after end of 

Quarter

Reporting

Phase:

Initial 

Submission

Recipient

Review

Agency

Review Published

Prime 

Recipients 

Review Data 

Submitted 

By Sub(s)

Agency 

Comments 

on Data 

Submitted

10

31-32 days after end of Quarter - Maintenance

Recipient Report Corrections Possible

Continuous

QA

Prime 

& Sub 

Recipients 

Make 

Corrections

12

Agency “View Only” and Daily Extract

11 – 14 days 

after end of 

Quarter

Extended 

Submission* 

1

Extended

 Submission*

4

11

* After Extended Submission period, reports may only be corrected, not submitted.

All reporting phase changes will occur at midnight Eastern Time.
Order entered January 8, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00894
- CV
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUM AN SERVICES COMMISSI ON, Appellant
V. JOSEPH MCRAE, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 04163 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s January 6, 2015 motion to substitute its lead counsel. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove attorney Kamilla Stokes as counsel for appellant and to add attorney Lisa V. Cubrie l with the Attorney General’s Office as lead counsel for appellant.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Zayo Group, LLC
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(dollars in thousands)
 2008
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2010
    
    
    2011Calculation of EarningsPre-Tax Income From Continuing Operations
    
    $
    (4,103
    )
    
    $
    (11,923
    )
    
    $
    (141
    )
    
    $
    7,548Fixed Charges
    
    
    7,678
    
    
    
    17,117
    
    
    
    22,396
    
    
    
    38,211Pre-Tax Income From Continuing Operations and
Fixed Charges
    
    $
    3,575
    
    
    $
    5,194
    
    
    $
    22,255
    
    
    $
    45,759Calculation of Fixed ChargesInterest Expense
    
    
    6,287
    
    
    
    15,245
    
    
    
    18,692
    
    
    
    33,414Interest Factor in Rental Expense (1)
    
    
    1,391
    
    
    
    1,872
    
    
    
    3,704
    
    
    
    4,797Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    7,678
    
    
    $
    17,117
    
    
    $
    22,396
    
    
    $
    38,211Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    0.47
    
    
    
    0.30
    
    
    
    0.99
    
    
    
    1.20Deficiency
    
    $
    (4,103
    )
    
    $
    (11,923
    )
    
    $
    (141
    )
    
    
    n/a
 (1)
    
    The portion of total rental expense that represents the interest factor is estimated to be
12.5 percent.