alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Civil law, pollution: Edwards Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Civil law, pollution: Edwards Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Archives and Records Administration in cooperation with the Committee on the Bicentennial of the Constitution of the Judicial Conference of the United States 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Woodruff, EdwardsNorth Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-19901880-1890 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  California 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  192 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  020842014.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Robert L.G. White, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TransTechnology Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  August 21, 2006/s/ Robert L. G. White   Robert L. G. White   President & Chief Executive Officer  
23
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.F. Hughes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

The foregoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.

/s/  J.F. Hughes
     ----------------------------------------------------
     Chairman of the Board,
     Chief Executive Officer
     and Director

     October 9, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION OF 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Texas Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Melvin G. Brekhus, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: January 4, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Melvin G. Brekhus                
|                       |  |  |  | Melvin G. Brekhus                    
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Texas Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Texas Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(Reap. Dec. 8371)

#### B. R. Anderson & Co. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 390, etc.

(Decided December 21, 1954)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows concerning the merchandise referred to below:

> 1) The merchandise covered by these appeals consists of sheathing felt imported from England, which is such as or similar to the sheathing felt involved in *US v. Morse et al.,*decided in ARD 38 and ARD 45, and therein held to be subject to appraisement upon the basis of export value. The record in said case is hereby incorporated herein.

> 2) Sheathing felt such as or similar to the sheathing felt covered by these appeals was freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States in usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade at the prices stated during the respective periods, viz:

> Period of exportation Per crate of 10 rolls of sheathing felt 25 yds. long and 32 inches wide

> October 20, 1947, to February 8, 1948_ £8-4-0

> February 9, 1948, to November 12, 1950_ £8-15-0

> April 2, 1951, to January 20, 1952_ £11-8-6

> January 21, 1952, to August 31, 1952_ £12-11-6

> September 1, 1952, to January 25, 1953_ £12-6-0

> All less nondutiable charges as invoiced

> 3)There was no higher foreign value during the respective periods, and upon this stipulation the appeals enumerated in attached schedule may be deemed submitted, they being limited to sheathing felt.

On the agreed, facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the sheathing felt here involved, and that such values, for the sheathing felt exported during the respective periods, were as follows:

> Period of exportation Sterling per crate of 10 rolls of sheathing felt, 25 yards long by 32 inches wide

> October 20, 1947, to February 8, 1948_ 8£-4r-0

> February 9, 1948, to November 12, 1950_ £8-15-0

> April 2, 1951, to January 20, 1952_ £11-8-6

> January 21, 1952, to August 31, 1952_ £12-11-6

> September 1, 1952, to January 25, 1953_ £12-6-0

> All less nondutiable charges as invoiced

*564Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case: 2:11-cv-00086-JLG-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 12/14/11 Page: 1 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00086-JLG-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 12/14/11 Page: 2 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00086-JLG-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 12/14/11 Page: 3 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00086-JLG-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 12/14/11 Page: 4 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T18:47:11-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

TIMOTHY BAKSI,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-CV-615 

 Judge Sargus

Magistrate Judge King

OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY,

Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, a state inmate, brings this civil rights action under 42

U.S.C. §1983 challenging the denial of his parole. This matter is now

before the Court for the initial screen of the Complaint required by 28

U.S.C. §§ 1915(e), 1915A. For the reasons that follow, it is recommended

that the case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and

for failure to state a claim for relief.

The only named defendant is the Ohio Adult Parole Authority, a state

agency. This defendant is absolutely immune from suit under §1983 by

virtue of the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. See

Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police,491 U.S. 58, 68 (1989); Papasan

v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 276 (1986); Murray v. Ohio Adult Parole

Authority, 916 F.2d 713 (Table)(6th Cir. 1990). The Court therefore

lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the claim asserted in this action.

Moreover, the Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can

be granted. The United States Constitution does not guarantee an

inmate’s release on parole, Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr.

Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979), and Ohio has not created a liberty

interest in parole eligibility. Michael v. Ghee, 498 F.3d 372 (6th Cir.

Case: 2:11-cv-00615-EAS-NMK Doc #: 7 Filed: 07/14/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2007). Thus, plaintiff’s challenge to the denial of his release on

parole fails to state a constitutional claim.

It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the action be dismissed for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon

which relief can be granted.

If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and

Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve

on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation, specifically

designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part thereof in

question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28 U.S.C.

§636(b)(1); F.R. Civ. P. 72(b). Response to objections must be filed

within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. F.R.

Civ. P. 72(b). 

The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the

Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo

review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of

the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers,

Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States v. Walters, 

638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

 s/Norah McCann King 

 Norah McCann King

 United States Magistrate Judge

DATE: July 14, 2011

2

Case: 2:11-cv-00615-EAS-NMK Doc #: 7 Filed: 07/14/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Letter Agreement between the Company and Henry R. Wolfe, Ph.D.



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
 [GENAERA LETTERHEAD] 
 May 27, 2008 
 Henry R. Wolfe, Ph.D. 
 c/o Genaera Corporation 
 5110 Campus Drive 
 Plymouth Meeting, PA 
 19462 
 Dear Hank: 
 In conjunction with Genaera’s
decision to implement initiatives designed to conserve cash into mid-2009, we have discussed and you have agreed, intending to be legally bound, to the following: 
  

	 	•	 	 A voluntary 10% reduction in base compensation. As such, effective June 1, 2008, your base salary will be $18,750.00 per month ($225,000/year); and



  

	 	•	 	 A voluntary forfeiture of cash incentives, including salary increases and discretionary bonus awards, for 2008. 


 Please indicate your agreement with these changes by signing in the space provided below. 
  

									
		  		 		 		 	Sincerely,
					
		  		 		 		 	 /s/ John L. Armstrong, Jr.

		  		 		 		 	John L. Armstrong, Jr.
		  		 		 		 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	JLA/jlb	  		 		 		 	
					
	Accepted:	  	 /s/ Henry R. Wolfe
	 		 	Date:	 	 May 29, 2008
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Federal Railroad 

Administration

   

January 14, 2021 

Mr. Jeremy R. Ferguson 

President 

SMART Transportation Division 

24950 Country Club Boulevard 

North Olmsted, OH 44070 

Mr. Dennis R. Pierce 

National President 

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen 

7061 East Pleasant Valley Road 

Independence, OH 44131 

Dear Messrs. Ferguson and Pierce: 

This letter is in response to your submission of January 11, 2021, petitioning the Federal 

Railroad Administration (FRA) to issue an emergency order addressing security issues 

surrounding the upcoming presidential inauguration. FRA shares your concern for the safety of 

passenger rail crews and passengers. 

It is FRA’s statutory mission and primary focus to promote the safety of America’s freight and 

passenger railroads, including protecting the employees who keep them running. FRA is not the 

primary Federal agency given jurisdiction to address by emergency order the security concerns 

identified in your submission; the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and its Transportation 

Security Administration are the lead agencies here. While your petition correctly notes the 

differences in statutory and regulatory authorities between the Federal Aviation Administration 

and the FRA, which evolved based upon operational differences and legislative considerations, 

these differences do not provide a basis for FRA to take the requested action. Accordingly, FRA 

declines to grant your request for an emergency order. 

In addition, FRA does not believe it would be appropriate to introduce such an emergency order 

into the long-standing, well-established law enforcement partnerships between railroads and 

Federal, state, and local agencies. Consistent with your stated willingness “to work with the 

applicable agencies,” we encourage you to work with railroads as they coordinate to provide for 

safe passenger rail service at the upcoming Inauguration and beyond. Under the leadership of 

the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, FRA will continue actively to support Federal 

efforts to secure the Nation’s railroad transportation system. 

Sincerely, 

Ronald L. Batory 

Administrator 
cc: 

The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader 

The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Minority Leader 

The Honorable Maria Cantwell, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House 

The Honorable Kevin McCarthy, House Minority Leader 

The Honorable Peter DeFazio, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

Acting Secretary Steven Bradbury, U.S. Department of Transportation 

Acting Secretary Pete Gaynor, U.S. Department Homeland Security 

Administrator David Pekoske, Transportation Security Administration
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service 

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of intent. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to General Chemical Performance Products, LLC of Parsippany, New Jersey, an exclusive license to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/003,540, “Method and Device for Scrubbing Ammonia From Air Exhausted From Animal Rearing Facilities”, filed on December 3, 2004. 

# DATES:

                        Comments must be received within thirty (30) days of the date of publication of this Notice in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        June Blalock of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above;                         *telephone:*                         301-504-5989.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's intellectual property rights to this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public interest to so license this invention as General Chemical Performance Products, LLC of Parsippany, New Jersey has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 

Richard J. Brenner, 

Assistant Administrator.

 [FR Doc. E7-675 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-03-P