alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Pinocchio was wrong

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Pinocchio was wrong 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Defense Billboard #3 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Defense 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  157 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  D2.9.P65.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0343

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM JAMES HARNING,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 11, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 1 2021

07/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0343
# C_2007235EN.01002801.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/28

---

Designation of the judge to replace the President of the Civil Service Tribunal for the purpose of dealing with applications for interim measures

(2007/C 235/50)

On 19 September 2007, in accordance with Article 3(4) of Decision 2004/752 and Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, the Tribunal decided that, for the period from 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2008, Judge Van Raepenbusch, President of the Second Chamber, shall replace the President of the Tribunal for the purpose of dealing with applications for interim measures in the event of the President's absence or his being prevented from attending.

---
---

Exhibit 99.15

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year
ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 40-F) of Timmins Gold Corp. (Timmins), I,
G. H. Giroux, P.Eng., MASc., hereby consent to the use of my name in connection
with the references to the technical report entitled Preliminary Economic
Assessment Caballo Blanco Gold Heap Leach, Veracruz, Mexico readdressed to
Timmins on January 28, 2015, with an effective date as of May 7, 2012 (the
Technical Report) and to the incorporation by reference of references to, and
summaries of, the Technical Report in the Form 40-F.

/s/ G.H.
GirouxName: G. H. Giroux, P.Eng., MASc. Giroux Consultants
Ltd.

March 25, 2015

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Equal opportunity is for everyone.

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Equal opportunity is for everyone. 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Office for Human Resources 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Office for Human Resources 
                    -           Description        
                    -  In multiple languagesTitle appears on poster in various languages. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018838929.jpg; 018838939.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
May 15, 1946

No. 51144.

Suit 4520.

#### United *States*v. *Water Treatment Co. of America (Gurge & Co.).*

C. D, 929 reversed March 30, 1946. C. A. D. 332.
# C_2007183EN.01000501.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 June 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank te Rotterdam, Netherlands) — Criminal proceedings against Omni Metal Service

(Case C-259/05) (1)

1

(Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 - Waste - Cables composed of copper and PVC - Export to China for purposes of recovery - Heading GC 020 - Mixed waste - Combination of two materials mentioned in the green list of wastes - Such mixed waste not included on the green list - Consequences)

(2007/C 183/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank te Rotterdam

Party in the criminal prosecution in the main proceedings

Omni Metal Service

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank Rotterdam — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community (OJ 1993 L 30, p. 1) — Whether cable scrap with a diameter of 15 cm and composed of different materials may be classified as electronic scrap within the meaning of heading GC 020 of the green list in Annex II to that regulation — Whether it is possible to transport such waste without the notification procedure or without the need to transport it separately

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Heading GC 020 of the green list of wastes in Annex II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2557/2001 of 28 December 2001, is to be interpreted as covering wire cable only if such wire comes from electronic equipment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Heading GC 020 of the green list of wastes in Annex II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2557/2001 of 28 December 2001, is to be interpreted as covering wire cable only if such wire comes from electronic equipment.

| 2. | Regulation No 259/93, as amended by Regulation No 2557/2001, is to be construed in such a way that the fact that composite waste is a combination of two materials both of which are mentioned in the green list of wastes in Annex II to that regulation does not have the effect of making the rules laid down by that regulation concerning the wastes mentioned on that list applicable to such composite waste. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Regulation No 259/93, as amended by Regulation No 2557/2001, is to be construed in such a way that the fact that composite waste is a combination of two materials both of which are mentioned in the green list of wastes in Annex II to that regulation does not have the effect of making the rules laid down by that regulation concerning the wastes mentioned on that list applicable to such composite waste.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 1.10.2005.

1

---
## NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00 160

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ DARRYLL DUANE TAYLOR , A ppellant ,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 28 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Darryll Duane Taylor
, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of out of time
appeal seeking to challenge an order denying a post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus.

On March 13, 2014, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the
order from which the appeal was taken was not an appealable order, and requested2

correction of this defect within ten days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has
failed to respond to the Court ’ s directive.
Jurisdiction to grant post

- conviction habeas corpus relief in felony cases rests
exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC . ANN

. art. 11.07, § 5 (Vernon Supp. 2011); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of
Appeals for the Eighth Dist. , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee
, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717

– 18 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig.
proceeding). Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to grant the requested relief.

T he appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdicti on.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 15th day of May, 2014

.
# C_2008254EN.01000102.xml

| 7.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5164 — MSREF/Crowne Plaza Wiesbaden Hotel)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 254/02)

On 26 September 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5164. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5164. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
(Reap. Dec. 9323)

#### Finwood Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 249; 930.

(Decided February 24, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have stipulated and agreed in these cases as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto that the merchandise involved in the Appeals to Reap-praisement enumerated above consists of plywood exported from Finland in the year 1955 and that the merchandise is properly dutiable on the basis of the foreign market value as defined in Section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for home consumption including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised unit values less 4% packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher export value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof and that the stipulation is limited to the invoices where the merchandise was advanced in value and appraised on the basis of the home market value; that with respect to invoices embraced in such appeals where appraisement was made on the basis of the entered invoice unit values said appeals are herewith abandoned with respect to such invoices.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Reappraisement referred to herein may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), as amended, Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved in the appeals for reappraisement enumerated above and that, as to the items of merchandise covered by the said appeals which were advanced in *503value and appraised on the basis of home market value, such foreign value was the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum packed. As to the items of merchandise covered by the said appeals where appraisement was made on the basis of the entered invoice unit values, the said appeals for reappraisement, having been abandoned, are to that extent dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
REVOLVING
      LOAN AGREEMENT

    AMENDMENT
      TWO

     

    Amendment
      Date: June
      1,
      2007

     

    Credit
      Limit: $15,000.00

     

    RFG
      Acquisition I Inc., a Delaware corporation, promises to pay RICHARD F. BESTON,
      JR. (“Lender”), an individual, the sum of FIFTEEN THOUSAND and 00/100 DOLLARS
      ($15,000.00) (the “Amended Credit Limit”) or such other principal amount that
      may be outstanding, in no case to exceed the Amended Credit Limit, as evidenced
      by the books and records of Lender. 

     

    This
      Amendment Two hereby amends the interest rate charged on outstanding loan
      borrowings from 4.75% per annum to the Prime Rate of Interest, as listed in
      the
      Wall Street Journal, plus 1% per annum.

    


    This
      Amendment Two hereby amends the default rate of interest from 10.0% per annum
      to
      the Prime Rate of Interest, as listed in the Wall Street Journal, plus 6% per
      annum.

    


    All
      other
      terms and conditions of the original Revolving Loan Agreement, dated November
      20, 2006, as amended, remain unchanged and in full force and
      effect.

    


    This
      Amendment Two is effective as of the date listed above.

     

    RFG
      Acquisition I Inc.

     

    
      	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	
               /s/
                David W. Matre  

            	 	 	
            
	 	
              

              David
                W. Matre

            	 	 	
            
	 	
              Chief
                Financial Officer  

            	 	 	
            


    

    
“Lender”

     

    
      	 	 	 	 
	
              /s/
                Richard F. Beston, Jr.

            	 	 	
            
	
              

              RICHARD
                F. BESTON, JR., an individual

            	 	 	
            


    

     

    DO
      NOT DESTROY THIS ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
Case: 2:12-cv-00005-EAS-TPK Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 1 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00005-EAS-TPK Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 2 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00005-EAS-TPK Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 3 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00005-EAS-TPK Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 4 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00005-EAS-TPK Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 5 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T19:20:13-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
 








































 
 

  Exhibit 4(g)    
    


 SCHEDULE  





			
	CONTRACT NUMBER	 	EFFECTIVE DATE
	

OWNER 1	
 	

BIRTH DATE OF OWNER 1
	

OWNER 2	
 	

BIRTH DATE OF OWNER 2
	

ANNUITANT	
 	

BIRTH DATE OF ANNUITANT
	

BENEFICIARY	
 	

ANNUITY COMMENCEMENT DATE






 INITIAL PURCHASE PAYMENT: {$    } 


 {MINIMUM GUARANTEED INTEREST RATE FOR THE GUARANTEED ACCOUNT: {    %}} 



 ANNUAL EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATES ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE:  


{FIXED
ACCOUNT—    %}

{DCA FIXED ACCOUNT 1—    %}

{DCA FIXED ACCOUNT 2—    %} 


 MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE  



{    %}
per annum. 


 ADMINISTRATION CHARGE  


{    %}
per annum. 


 DEATH BENEFIT  


{    }



 DEATH BENEFIT COST CALCULATION METHOD  


{    }



 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE FEE: {$    } 



        The
contract maintenance fee is deducted prior to the Annuity Commencement Date on each Contract Anniversary, and on any day that the Contract is surrendered
other than the Contract Anniversary. The contract maintenance fee will be deducted from the Allocation Options in the same proportion as their values are to the Contract Value. The contract
maintenance fee will be waived by the Company in the event the Contract Value or the aggregate Purchase Payments reduced by surrenders equals or exceeds $50,000 on the date the contract maintenance
fee is to be deducted. 


 TRANSFER FEE  


{$    }
per transfer in excess of 12 transfers in any Contract Year. 


1







 
 SURRENDER CHARGE  



			
	Number of Full Years Elapsed Between

the Date the Purchase Payment was applied to

the Contract and the Surrender Date 	 	Surrender Charge Percentage 
	{0}	 	{0%}
	{1}	 	{0%}
	{2}	 	{0%}
	{3+}	 	{0%}





 ALLOCATION OPTIONS AVAILABLE ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE  



{Protective Life Guaranteed Account}



{Fixed
Account}

{DCA Fixed Account 1}

{DCA Fixed Account 2} 




 Sub-Accounts of the

Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account:  



			
	{Fund Family 1}	 	 {Fund Family 4}
	{Fund 1}	 	{Fund 1}
	{Fund 2}	 	{Fund 2}
	{Fund 3}	 	{Fund 3}
	{Fund 4}	 	{Fund 4}
	{Fund 5}	 	{Fund 5}
	{Fund 6}	 	{Fund 6}
	{Fund 7}	 	{Fund 7}
	
 {Fund Family 2}	
 	
 {Fund Family 5}
	{Fund 1}	 	{Fund 1}
	{Fund 2}	 	{Fund 2}
	{Fund 3}	 	{Fund 3}
	{Fund 4}	 	{Fund 4}
	{Fund 5}	 	{Fund 5}
	{Fund 6}	 	{Fund 6}
	{Fund 7}	 	{Fund 7}
	
 {Fund Family 3}	
 	
 {Fund Family 6}
	{Fund 1}	 	{Fund 1}
	{Fund 2}	 	{Fund 2}
	{Fund 3}	 	{Fund 3}
	{Fund 4}	 	{Fund 4}
	{Fund 5}	 	{Fund 5}
	{Fund 6}	 	{Fund 6}
	{Fund 7}	 	{Fund 7}





2











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4(g)
Before the Third Division,

October 31, 1950

No. 54805.

#### International Expediters, Inc., Agent for Wales Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

petitions 6728-R and 6733-R (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial counsel for the petitioner conceded that petition 6728-R was filed more than 60 days after the liquidation of entries 727697, 724893, 729055, 730278, 730907, 731070, 732399, 732796, and 702245. Government’s motion to dismiss petition 6728-R as to said entries on the ground of untimeliness was therefore granted. The testimony of petitioner’s witnesses established that petitioner cooperated with customs officials on all details relating to the entries before the court; that in 1944 and 1945 it knew of no other prices in Mexico for these slippers in the usual wholesale quantities; that it did not know why the appraiser advanced the values on some of the entries and not on others; and that there was no intent to defraud the revenue. Petition 6728 was dismissed as to the entries enumerated above. As to the remaining entries in petition 6728-R and the entry in petition 6733-R, it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the'appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petitions were therefore granted as to these entries.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.F. Hughes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.




/s/ J.F. Hughes
---------------------------
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
January 5, 2006