alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# If I didn't have air supremacy, I wouldn't be here. General Dwight D. Eisenhower, June 1944

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  If I didn't have air supremacy, I wouldn't be here. General Dwight D. Eisenhower, June 1944 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Description        
                    -  World War II, the Air Force Remembers ....A Martin B-26 Marauder over the Normandy Beachhead, June 1944. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Eisenhower, Dwight D. (Dwight David), 1890-1969 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-20001940-1950 
                    -           Country        
                    -  France 
                    -           State        
                    -  Normandy 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 46 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  031262702.jpg; 031262702.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2007297EN.01003802.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/38

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 October 2007 — Borco-Marken-Import Mathiessen v OHIM (Caipi)

(Case T-405/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark Caipi - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2007/C 297/78)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Borco-Marken-Import Mathiessen GmbH & Co KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Wolter, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 August 2004 (Case R 912/2002-2) concerning the application for registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign Caipi.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314 of 18.12.2004.

1

---
No. 54181.

#### Jack Altmann & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 120776-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the miniature leather gloves the subject of *United States*v. *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*(37 C. C. P. A. 32, C. A. D. 415), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Craig S. Jones, et a/., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Kerry A. Allen, Plan, 

Administrator, eta/. 

Defendants. 

ORDER 

Case No. 2:11-cv-380 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

Magistrate Judge Kemp 

On January 30, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Kemp, to whom this 

case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B) and General Order 95-2 

for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and 

Recommendation concerning the disposition of Defendants' motion for judgment 

on the pleadings as to Count II of this ERISA case. ECF No. 162. The Report 

and Recommendation recommended denying the motion. 

The Report and Recommendation notified the parties of their right to file 

objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b )( 1 ). The Report and Recommendation further specifically advised the 

parties that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within 

fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the 

District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting 

Case: 2:11-cv-00380-MHW-TPK Doc #: 165 Filed: 03/25/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
the Report and Recommendation. Report and Recommendation 16, ECF No. 

162. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were 

filed. 

Accordingly, having received no objections, the Report and 

Recommendation is ADOPTED, and Defendants' motion for judgment on the 

pleadings, ECF No. 86, is denied. The Clerk shall remove ECF No. 86 from the 

Civil Justice Reform Act motions report 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

UNITED 

MitJJfs{f!u~ STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case: 2:11-cv-00380-MHW-TPK Doc #: 165 Filed: 03/25/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 41929.

#### Protest 432544-G of Salem Shawiry (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of laces similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
# C_2007271EN.01000102.xml

| 14.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4807 — PSA/IPH/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 271/02)

On 31 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4807. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4807. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 10G

COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

                           CNT'S ANNUAL BONUS PLAN

    The Company's Annual Bonus Plan is determined by multiplying an employee's
eligible base compensation by the Company's Annual Bonus Plan factor and the
employee's individual annual bonus participation rate. The Company's Annual
Bonus Plan factor is based on a chart which outlines payout percentages for
achievement of defined levels of revenue and operating profit as a percentage of
revenue (after deducting the cost of annual bonuses and excluding special
charges). The Annual Bonus Plan factor is based on the chart and our actual
levels of revenue and operating profit, with each factor being equally weighted.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Roy T. K. Thung, certify that: 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Independence Corp.; 

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
EXHIBIT 13.3









ß ü




To whom it may concern,




Munich, June 28.2011




CONSENT




This is to confirm that ToLuna Germany GmbH (formerly Ciao Surveys GmbH, now part of the Toluna Group) conducted consumer surveys commissioned by SodaStream International Ltd. in the following countries as detailed below:




Country

Date of Survey

Number of RespondentsAustria

September 2009

1014Australia

September 2009

997Belgium

September 2009

1007Finland

September 2009

1000France

June 2009

506Germany

September 2009

1024Italy

September 2009

1023South Africa

September 2009

984Switzerland

September 2009

1004





The survey questions included the following questions:





1.
Do you have or have you ever had a home carbonation system or a similar appliance in your household? (refer to the past 5 years)


2.
Which make is/was this home carbonation system?





We hereby give our consent to the use of results from the above surveys in the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by SodaStream International Ltd. with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and to the reference in the Annual Report to the name ToLuna Germany GmbH (formerly: Ciao Surveys GmbH) in connection therewith.





We further consent to the incorporation by reference of this consent, results from the above surveys and references to our name in connection therewith in the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-170299) of SodaStream International Ltd.





Sincerely,





TOLUNA Germany GmbH (formerly CIAO SURVEYS GmbH)





By:
/s/ Markus BockerName: Markus BockerTitle: VP Group Finance




ToLuna Germany GmbH ß ü


Tel: Fax: Web:


Geschäftsführer:


Bankverbindung: Konto: BLZ: 10 Handelsregister München:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-51295

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADOLFO BAEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-03-CR-441-1-AML

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Adolfo Baez

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior

conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0520

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

SCOTT A. ST. CLAIR,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

CLARICE J. ST. CLAIR,

 Respondent and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Mike Menahan, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 15 2022

06/15/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0520
# CA2008093EN.01001501.xml

| 15.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 93/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 93/15

---

RESERVE LISTS (1)

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/46/06

ADMINISTRATORS (AD5)

WITH BULGARIAN CITIZENSHIP

(2008/C 93 A/02)

FIELD 1: EUROPEAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

| ALEXANDER | Lubomirov |
| --- | --- |
| ALEXANDROV | Alexander Stoilov |
| ANDREEV | Svetlozar |
| ANGELOVA | Desislava |
| ARMUTLIEVA ILIEVA | Hristina |
| ATANASSOVA | Maria |
| BOJKOV | Victor |
| BRATOEVA | Petya |
| CHENEV | Simeon |
| CHRISTOV | Michayl |
| DIMITROV | Gueorgui |
| DINKOVA | Dinka |
| GARKOVA | Inna |
| GENTCHEV | Galin |
| HRISTOZOVA | Vladislava |
| IVANOV | Kalin |
| KARAPEEVA | Anjelina |
| KARLOUKOVSKA | Vessela |
| KIRYAKOV | Kiril |
| KOVACHEVA | Nora |
| KRASTEVA | Vilina |
| MARINOVA | Amelia |
| MARINOVA | Assia |
| MILADINOVA | Gergana |
| NATAN | Valeri Valeriev |
| NAYDENOVA | Nadezhda |
| NEDELCHEVA | Marina |
| NEMIGUENTCHEVA | Velimira |
| NIKOLOV | Krassimir |
| NIKOLOVA | Pavlina Stoyanova |
| OHRIDSKI | Martin |
| PETKOVA | Ralitza |
| PETROV | Petre Vassilev |
| PETROVA | Desislava |
| POPOVA | Blaga Valentinova |
| RAYKOVSKA | Milena |
| SAVOV | Krasimir |
| SHISHKOVA, YAKIMOVA | Albena |
| STANTCHEV | Branimir |
| STEFANOVA | Liliya |
| STOILOVA | Elitsa |
| STOYCHEV | Teodor |
| STRAHILOVA | Mila |
| TANOVA | Svetla |
| TCHORBADJIYSKA | Angelina |
| TOUHTCHIEV | Vassil |
| TOUYKOVA | Marta |
| VALEVA | Mariana |
| VASSILEVA | Nikolina |
| VERGUILOVA | Stanislava |

ALEXANDER

Lubomirov

ALEXANDROV

Alexander Stoilov

ANDREEV

Svetlozar

ANGELOVA

Desislava

ARMUTLIEVA ILIEVA

Hristina

ATANASSOVA

Maria

BOJKOV

Victor

BRATOEVA

Petya

CHENEV

Simeon

CHRISTOV

Michayl

DIMITROV

Gueorgui

DINKOVA

Dinka

GARKOVA

Inna

GENTCHEV

Galin

HRISTOZOVA

Vladislava

IVANOV

Kalin

KARAPEEVA

Anjelina

KARLOUKOVSKA

Vessela

KIRYAKOV

Kiril

KOVACHEVA

Nora

KRASTEVA

Vilina

MARINOVA

Amelia

MARINOVA

Assia

MILADINOVA

Gergana

NATAN

Valeri Valeriev

NAYDENOVA

Nadezhda

NEDELCHEVA

Marina

NEMIGUENTCHEVA

Velimira

NIKOLOV

Krassimir

NIKOLOVA

Pavlina Stoyanova

OHRIDSKI

Martin

PETKOVA

Ralitza

PETROV

Petre Vassilev

PETROVA

Desislava

POPOVA

Blaga Valentinova

RAYKOVSKA

Milena

SAVOV

Krasimir

SHISHKOVA, YAKIMOVA

Albena

STANTCHEV

Branimir

STEFANOVA

Liliya

STOILOVA

Elitsa

STOYCHEV

Teodor

STRAHILOVA

Mila

TANOVA

Svetla

TCHORBADJIYSKA

Angelina

TOUHTCHIEV

Vassil

TOUYKOVA

Marta

VALEVA

Mariana

VASSILEVA

Nikolina

VERGUILOVA

Stanislava

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2009 and may be extended.

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

---
No. 65628.

#### S. Berger Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/26349, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of heads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 38970.

#### Protests 457937-G, etc., of S. Kalinsky Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was established that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. 'The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
No. 64307.

protests 182039-K, etc. (New York).

#### L. Bamberger & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable as follows: (a) As to the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to May 28, 1950, at 20 percent under paragraph 1547(a) ; and (b) as to items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after May 28,1950, at 10 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476).
Exhibit 15.1



|           |  |                              
|---------- |  | -----------------------------
|Our ref    |  | JBS\611736\4497417v1         
|Direct tel |  | +852 3690 7440               
|Email      |  | jai.singh@maplesandcalder.com

Mecox Lane Limited

22nd Floor, Gems Tower, Building 20, No. 487, Tianlin Road

Shanghai 200233, Peoples Republic of China

29 April 2011

Dear Sirs

Mecox Lane Limited (the
Company)

We consent to the reference to our firm under the heading Taxation in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2010, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the month of April 2011.

Yours faithfully,

/s/ Maples and Calder

Maples and Calder
EXHIBIT 14.2



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-180313) pertaining to the 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan of Caesarstone
Sdot-Yam Ltd., of our report dated February 6, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Caesarstone
Australia Pty Ltd included in Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd.’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|/s/ Grant Thornton Australia Ltd |  | 
|-------------------------------- |  | 
|Grant Thornton Australia Ltd     |  | 
|Melbourne, Australia             |  | 
|March 21, 2013                   |  |
No. 53147.

#### International Hat Company v. United States,

protests 129275-K, etc. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony of the witnesses called in this case established that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats known as harvest hats, valued at less than $3 per dozen. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
No. 59133.

protests 173113-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
WILLIE EDWARD DOZIER,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2812

Opinion filed October 19, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Willie Edward Dozier, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 

2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). 
2

Petitioner is warned that the filing of any further successive or unauthorized 

pleadings concerning Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-2008-CF-014339-

AXXX-MA may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to a bar 

on further pro se appearances before this court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410. 

BILBREY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR; KELSEY, J., dissents in part with 

opinion.
3

KELSEY, J., dissenting in part.

I concur in the dismissal of the present petition, styled "The All Great Writ." I 

respectfully dissent, however, as to imposing sanctions barring any additional pro se 

filings seeking relief from the same judgment and sentence challenged here and in at 

least five prior cases in this Court. The Court issued a show-cause order under State v. 

Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Petitioner responded that he should be allowed 

many more frivolous filings before he is barred, citing cases in which we have allowed 

over two dozen filings determined to be without merit before entering a sanction order 

barring further pro se filings. Petitioner has not yet raised any meritorious challenge to 

his judgment and sentence, and in response to our show cause order he has not 

articulated any meritorious challenges yet to be raised. I fully respect petitioner's 

constitutional right of access to courts, but on these facts I conclude that his 

constitutional rights to access this Court have been satisfied, and I would immediately 

prohibit petitioner from filing any additional pro se challenges to the same judgment 

and sentence at issue here.