alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008161EN.01000401.xml

| 25.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 June 2008

(2008/C 161/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5568 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 168,00 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4589 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79095 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4026 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6185 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 131,35 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9745 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,075 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 239,16 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7025 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,3663 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6793 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,344 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9173 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6326 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5823 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,1544 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0576 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1305 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 609,73 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,5556 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6951 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2473 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 420,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0666 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,200 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,7520 |
| THB | Thai baht | 52,200 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5089 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1096 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5568

JPY

Japanese yen

168,00

DKK

Danish krone

7,4589

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79095

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4026

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6185

ISK

Iceland króna

131,35

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9745

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,075

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

239,16

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7025

PLN

Polish zloty

3,3663

RON

Romanian leu

3,6793

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,344

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9173

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6326

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5823

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,1544

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0576

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1305

KRW

South Korean won

1 609,73

ZAR

South African rand

12,5556

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6951

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2473

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 420,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0666

PHP

Philippine peso

69,200

RUB

Russian rouble

36,7520

THB

Thai baht

52,200

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5089

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1096

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2008146EN.01000101.xml

| 12.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 June 2008

(2008/C 146/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5515 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 166,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4591 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79145 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3571 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6117 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 120,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9900 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,400 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,01 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7022 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,3740 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6636 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,305 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9464 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6376 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5777 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,1169 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0518 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1297 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 598,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,3864 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7339 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2492 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 436,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0765 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,941 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,7412 |
| THB | Thai baht | 51,359 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5435 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1581 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5515

JPY

Japanese yen

166,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4591

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79145

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3571

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6117

ISK

Iceland króna

120,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9900

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,400

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,01

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7022

PLN

Polish zloty

3,3740

RON

Romanian leu

3,6636

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,305

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9464

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6376

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5777

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,1169

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0518

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1297

KRW

South Korean won

1 598,43

ZAR

South African rand

12,3864

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7339

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2492

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 436,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0765

PHP

Philippine peso

68,941

RUB

Russian rouble

36,7412

THB

Thai baht

51,359

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5435

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1581

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0297 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 205 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
DAN WEISS

MANAGING DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS & REGULATORY 

(312) 997-7573

DAN.WEISS@COAIR.COM

October 5, 2011

Robert Finamore, Acting Chief

Foreign Carrier Licensing Division

Esta Rosenberg, Chief

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Notice of United Air Lines, Inc. of Termination of Code-Share Service

Docket DOT-OST-1996-1410

Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Finamore:

Pursuant to the conditions applicable to the Statements of Authorization granted to United Air 

Lines, Inc. (“United”) and Thai Airways International Public Co., LTD. (“Thai”) by the 

Department’s Notice of Action Taken dated October 18, 1996, in the above-referenced docket, 

United hereby notifies the Department of the termination of code-share services under which 

Thai displays United’s “UA” designator code and United displays Thai’s “TG” designator code. 

This termination of code-share services will be effective on or after March 1, 2012.

Sincerely,

Dan Weiss

Managing Director, International Affairs & 

 Regulatory 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND

 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.

cc: David Heffernan
 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all 

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

carl.nelson@aa.com

efaberman@wileyrein.com (Air Tran/Frontier)

howard_kass@usairways.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com (Hawaiian/Jet Blue)

jeff.morgan@delta.com

jyoung@yklaw.com (Spirit)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com (USA3000)

 barbara.russell@virginamerica.com

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Spirit)

msinick@ssd.com (Alaska)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.allen@faa.gov

Annalei Avanceña 

International Regulatory Advisor

October 5, 2011
No. 53705.

protest 147090-K (New York).

#### W. A. Taylor & Co. *v.*United States,

*203Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed, not found, were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as “not landed, not found,” is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          350828
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      694
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                607471
<PP&E>                                         2778004
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3413338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1000327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         60632
<OTHER-SE>                                     1950665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3413338
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   523
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                370241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (346379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (346379)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (346379)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 24  POWER OF ATTORNEY  KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, being a director or officer, or both, of LED Lighting Company, a Delaware corporation, (registrant) hereby constitutes and appoints Kevin Kearney, acting individually, as the undersigneds true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to the registrants annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done that such annual report and its amendments shall comply with the Securities Act, and the applicable rules and regulations adopted or issued pursuant thereto, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their substitute or re-substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.  In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.  SignatureTitleDate/s/ Kevin KearneyChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) and DirectorApril 14, 2016Kevin Kearney
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15694-15695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act

[[Page 15695]]

(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be 
conducted throughout the United States. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 27, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc., Virginia Beach, Virginia; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of The Bank of Richmond, 
National Association, Richmond, Virginia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 28, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-6041 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsYOUSSOUF OUSMANE ABDOURAHMANE

________________________________

Case No. 2:11-cr-156 (1)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to

Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one (1)

of the Superseding Indictment. After examining the Defendant under

oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine

that the defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed

plea, that the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that

the offenses charged are supported by an independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements of such offense. 

 The plea agreement contains an agreed sentence and it is up to

the District Judge to determine if the sentence is appropriate. 

Additionally, the Defendant has entered an Alford plea to which the

United States objects. I find that the plea is a valid Alford plea,

but it is still up to the District Judge to decide whether to accept

it. If the District Judge does accept both the agreed sentence and

the Alford plea, I RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of guilty

should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty and

sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be

rejected and the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty

plea. The Defendant remains in the custody of the U.S. Marshal

pending sentencing. 

Date: March 22, 2012 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and

Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and

Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28

U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).

Case: 2:11-cr-00156-PCE-NMK Doc #: 59 Filed: 03/22/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 51129.

#### Protests 88705-K, etc., of W. T. Grant Co. et al. (San Francisco, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 48667.

#### Protest 951577-G of Chicago Macaroni Co. of N. Y. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146. The protest was therefore sustained.
No. 62011.

#### J. H. Brown *v.*United States,

protests 213165-K, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Hire people with disabilities

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Hire people with disabilities 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Drawing of three wheelchair symbols. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 46 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018124885.jpg; 018124885.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

COREY S. FLUGGA, 

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-00126

Petitioner, JUDGE FROST

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ABEL

v. 

WARDEN, ROSS CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION, 

Respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

On January 25, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be

dismissed. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. 

(Doc. 11). Petitioner objects to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation of dismissal of his claims

on the merits. Petitioner raises all of the same arguments he previously presented. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), this Court has conducted a de novo review. For the reasons

already detailed in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s objections

(Doc. 11), are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

This action is hereby DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST

United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cv-00126-GLF-MRA Doc #: 12 Filed: 02/16/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT 

REEVALUATION 

for the 

DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC 

XpressWest High-Speed Train Project

Apple Valley, CA to Las Vegas, NV 

Prepared By: 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Railroad Administration

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, DC 20590 

September 2020
DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC/XPRESSWEST HIGH-SPEED TRAIN FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION

SEPTEMBER 2020

Contents

XpressWest Reevaluation Summary

Attachment A: Summary of Project Modifications

Attachment B: Resource Impacts Analysis Report

Attachment C: Traffic and Transportation Technical Report

Attachment C1: Traffic and Transportation Supporting Information 

Attachment D: Cultural Resources Technical Report 

Attachment E: Hydrology and Water Quality Technical Report

Attachment F: Air Quality Technical Report

Attachment G: Noise and Vibration Technical Report

Attachment H: Biological Resources Technical Report

Attachment H1: California Natural Diversity Database Sensitive Vegetation Communities List

Attachment H2: California Natural Diversity Database Special-Status Plants List

Attachment H3: California Native Plant Society Rare and Endangered Plants List

Attachment H4: USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation Special-Status Plants List

Attachment H5: California Natural Diversity Database Special-Status Animals List

Attachment I: Mitigation Measure Summary