alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6208

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CLEVELAND ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-91-161, CA-01-1028)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 23, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleveland Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Joseph McNulty, United

States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266

(1988).

2

PER CURIAM:

Cleveland Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of

appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party,

the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after

the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257,

264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229

(1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July

10, 2001. Robinson’s notice of appeal was filed on December 31,

2002.* Because Robinson failed to file a timely notice of appeal

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
3

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8969 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8969

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that aliens who 
  have been convicted of or who have committed an offense related to 
entering military, naval, or coast guard property, are inadmissible and 
                              deportable.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2024

Mr. Luttrell (for himself, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Arrington, Ms. Hageman, Mr. 
  Dunn of Florida, Mr. Bean of Florida, and Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that aliens who 
  have been convicted of or who have committed an offense related to 
entering military, naval, or coast guard property, are inadmissible and 
                              deportable.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Military Assets Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. INADMISSIBILITY AND DEPORTABILITY RELATED TO ENTERING MILITARY, 
              NAVAL, OR COAST GUARD PROPERTY.

    (a) Inadmissibility.--Section 212(a)(2) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
                    ``(J) Entering military, naval, or coast guard 
                property.--Any alien who has been convicted of, who 
                admits having committed, or who admits committing acts 
                which constitute the essential elements of an offense 
                under section 1382 of title 18, United States Code, is 
                inadmissible.''.
    (b) Deportability.--Section 237(a)(2) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
                    ``(G) Entering military, naval, or coast guard 
                property.--Any alien who has been convicted of an 
                offense under section 1382 of title 18, United States 
                Code, is deportable.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9349 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9349

  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to provide that required country-of-
origin labeling for any agricultural product packaged in a can shall be 
     on the front label or top of such can, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 13, 2024

Mr. Harder of California (for himself and Mr. Van Orden) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to provide that required country-of-
origin labeling for any agricultural product packaged in a can shall be 
     on the front label or top of such can, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Consumer Awareness of 
National Source Act'' or the ``American CANS Act''.

SEC. 2. METHOD OF NOTIFICATION OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN OF AN AGRICULTURAL 
              PRODUCT PACKAGED IN A CAN.

    (a) In General.--Section 304(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1304(b)) is amended by inserting after the first sentence the 
following: ``In the case of such an article that is an agricultural 
product (as defined in section 207 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 
1946) packaged in a can, the marking required under this subsection 
shall appear on the front label of the can or be stamped, embossed, or 
printed on the top of the can.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
only apply to agricultural products imported on or after the date that 
is 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**Certification**

 

In connection with the annual report of Lentuo International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)                 the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   April 30, 2013 |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |
|                        |   |
|                        |   | /s/   Jianping Chen |
|                        | Name:  | Jianping   Chen |
|                        | Title: | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
Before the Second Division,

October 11, 1945

No. 50574.

#### Protests 486128-G, etc., of Edward M. Poons Co. of Kobe, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats known as harvest hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Caradine Hat Co.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority, the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Anpulo Food Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), Maochun Kang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Annual Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Maochun KangMaochun KangPrincipal Financial Officer


Dated: July 1, 2016
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

MARK EDWARD HURST, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 2:11-cv-1090 

 JUDGE SMITH 

 Magistrate Judge King 

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF 

REHABILITATION AND 

CORRECTION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 ORDER 

On August 7, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation recommending that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment be 

GRANTED. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 107). The parties were advised of their 

right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do 

so. This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff Mark Hurst’s Objections to the Report and 

Recommendation. (See Doc. 109). The Court will consider the matter de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 

 The objections present, once again, the issues presented to and considered by the 

Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff asserts that he has submitted 

evidence to establish a genuine issue of material fact with respect to his deliberate indifference 

claim. However, the Court agrees with the findings of the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff has 

failed to produce evidence that Defendants acted with deliberate indifference. There is evidence 

Case: 2:11-cv-01090-GCS-NMK Doc #: 115 Filed: 09/30/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 

that nonsurgical management is appropriate in some cases. Plaintiff’s disagreement with his 

course of medical treatment, however, does not satisfy his claim for deliberate indifference. 

Therefore, for the reasons stated in detail in the Report and Recommendation, this Court finds 

that Plaintiff’s objections are without merit. 

The Report and Recommendation, Document 107, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 96) is hereby GRANTED. Defendants’ 

Motion to Strike is DENIED AS MOOT. 

The Clerk shall remove Documents 96, 107, and 114 from the Court’s pending motions 

list. The Clerk shall enter final judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:11-cv-01090-GCS-NMK Doc #: 115 Filed: 09/30/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
(Reap. Dec. 9262)

#### Daiichi Bussan Kaisha, Ltd. *v.*United States

Entry No. 945051.

(Decided November 25, 1958)

*Myron Goldman*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Counsel for the respective parties, subject to approval of the Court, that at the time of the exportation of the Cotton Broadcloth Combination Ladies skirts and Blouses, *587involved in the above reappraisement, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the Country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at U. S. $12.87 per dozen, net packed.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value for the said merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

> It is further stipulated that this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was United States $12.87 per dozen, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 4.58

Subrogation Agreement

Transferor (hereinafter referred to as Part A): Zhongshan Mingyang
Electrical Appliance Co., LTD.

Location: Daling Administration Zone, Torch Development Park, Zhongshan, Guangdong

Transferee (hereinafter referred to as Party B): Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Industry Group Co., LTD.

Location: Mingyang Industrial Park, Jianye Road, Torch Development Zone, Zhongshan, Guangdong Province

WHEREAS, Party B being actual executor of the Inner Mongolia Damaoqi Wind Power Farm, an agreement is hereby entered into by and between Party A and
Party B through amicable consultation, to transfer the right as a creditor of RMB43,973,755.15 from Party A to Party B.



|1. | Party A will transfer its right to Party B to collect an aggregate of RMB 43,973,775.15, including interests and late payment penalty, outstanding amount payable by
Shanxi Zhangze Electric Power CO., LTD. arising from the Inner Mongolia Damaoqi Wind Power Project.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | After signing this Agreement, Party B, substituting Party A, assumes creditors right under the Inner Mongolia Damaoqi Wind Power Farm project. Party A shall
inform Shanxi Zhangze Electric Power CO., LTD. about the transfer within 30 days after signing this Agreement.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | This Agreement is prepared in triplicate, with Party A and Party B each holding one copy and one copy as attachment of notice sent by Party A to Shanxi Zhangze Electric
Power CO., LTD.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | This Agreement shall enter into force as of the date of signing and sealing.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                              |  |                                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Party A: Zhongshan Mingyang Electrical Appliance CO., LTD. Signature of Representative:  LOGO |  | Party B: Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Group CO., LTD. Signature of Representative:  LOGO

Date: June 16, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 71 (Friday, April 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5773]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Herculaneum Women and the Origins of 
Archaeology''

    Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Herculaneum Women and the Origins of 
Archaeology'', imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign owner. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of all of these objects at the Getty 
Villa, Los Angeles, California, beginning on or about July 12, 2007, 
until on or about November 5, 2007, and the continued temporary display 
of two of the objects until on or about April 14, 2008, is in the 
national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to 
be published in the Federal Register.
    For Further Information Contact: For further information, including 
a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 
453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: April 6, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E7-7037 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
No. 50606.

#### Protests 55728-K, etc., of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve Bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent. Plaintiff having abandoned its claim as to the sum of- £10-8-7, entry 819280, and as to the sum of £2-2-5, entry 822404, protests 59587-K and 65268-K, respectively, were' overruled as to those items.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN OHIO DISTRICT

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, Case No. CR-2-12-206

JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

v.

MICHAEL KEITH SHEPARD,

Defendant.

ORDER REVOKING SUPERVISED RELEASE AND IMPOSING SENTENCE

This matter came on for a hearing this 10th day of June, 2015 upon the Petition to

Revoke Defendant’s Supervised Release status. Defendant, Counsel for Defendant, and Counsel

for the Government appeared.

At the hearing, Defendant admitted to violating:

STANDARD CONDITION NO. 2: “The defendant shall report to the probation officer

and shall submit a truthful and complete written report within the first five days of each month.”

SPECIAL CONDITION NO. 2: “The defendant’s residence and employment shall be

pre-approved by the probation officer and in compliance with state and local law.”

SPECIAL CONDITION NO. 4: “The defendant shall register and keep the registration

current in each jurisdiction where the defendant resides, where he is an employee, and where the

offender is a student. For initial registration purposes only, the defendant shall also register in

the jurisdiction in which convicted, if such jurisdiction is different from the jurisdiction of

Residence (42 U.S.C. § 16913(a)). If the state of residence is not accepting sex offender

registrations pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) and

1

Case: 2:12-cr-00206-GLF Doc #: 49 Filed: 06/12/15 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
unable to accept the defendant’s registration, the defendant must maintain contact with state

registration authorities and his probation officer to determine when such registration can be

accepted. The duty to register may continue after expiration of the offender’s federal

supervision, and any existing duty to register under state law is not suspended and will remain in

effect until the state implements the SORNA of 2006. If the defendant’s supervision transfers to

another federal district the offender’s duty to register as required by SORNA shall be governed

by that district’s policy and the laws of that state.”

The Court accepts the admission.

Sentencing in this matter is continued until the sentencing date established in 15-CR-100. 

Defendant is ordered to be held without bail.

Defendant was remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal’s Service.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

Case: 2:12-cr-00206-GLF Doc #: 49 Filed: 06/12/15 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 55402.

#### Emil Buschoff & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 159184-K (A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
- COMBINED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND  RECORD OF DECISION  
- APPENDIX C: PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS (Part 3 of 3)
- Corridor Strip Maps (1 of 3)
- Corridor Strip Maps (2 of 3)
- Corridor Strip Maps (3 of 3)