alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

| Name of entity and place of jurisdiction             |   | Voting SecuritiesOwned Percentage |       |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|------------|
| PennantPark Floating Rate Funding I, LLC (Delaware)  |   | 100                               | %     |
| PennantPark Floating Rate Funding II, LLC (Delaware) |   | 100                               | %     |
| PennantPark CLO I, LLC (Delaware)                    |   | 100                               | %     |
| PennantPark CLO I, Ltd. (Cayman Islands)             |   | 100                               | %          |
| PennantPark CLO I Depositor, LLC (Delaware)          |   | 100                               | %     |
| PFLT Investment Holdings, LLC (Delaware)             |   | 100                               | %          |
| PennantPark Senior Secured Loan Fund I LLC           |   | 100                               | % (1) |

 

| (1) | This is a controlled affiliated investment. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q FOR THE PERIODS ENDED JULY 4, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1999             JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1999             JUL-04-1999
<CASH>                                          37,030                  72,321
<SECURITIES>                                    26,666                  19,001
<RECEIVABLES>                                  468,605                 477,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (24,942)                (22,112)
<INVENTORY>                                    487,792                 486,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,070,696               1,111,207
<PP&E>                                       1,209,814               1,234,016
<DEPRECIATION>                               (571,130)               (587,398)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,531,757               2,578,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          554,904                 571,044
<BONDS>                                        837,162                 840,905
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         5,686                   5,690
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,018,622               1,044,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,531,757               2,578,600
<SALES>                                        601,518               1,241,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               601,518               1,241,699
<CGS>                                          423,420                 877,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  542,321               1,116,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (10,019)                (17,779)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,740                  32,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,476                 111,193
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,506                  29,930
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,970                  81,263
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,970                  81,263
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.67                    1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67                    1.42


</TABLE>
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 61 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2005 

Referred to the Committe on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the remains of Rosa Parks to lie in honor in 

the rotunda of the Capitol. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That, in recognition of the historic contribu3 tions of Rosa Parks, her remains be permitted to lie in 

4 honor in the rotunda of the Capitol from October 30 to 

5 October 31, 2005, so that the citizens of the United States 

6 may pay their last respects to this great American. The 

7 Architect of the Capitol, under the direction and super8 vision of the President pro tempore of the Senate and the 

9 Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall take all 

10 necessary steps for the accomplishment of that purpose. 

Passed the Senate October 27, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BRASILAGRO  Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gustavo Javier Lopez, Chief Administrative Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/    Gustavo Javier Lopez 
|Gustavo Javier Lopez        
|Chief Administrative Officer



|                
|----------------
|October 31, 2013



1
# C_2007234EN.01000402.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4811 — Cetelem/Findomestic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 234/03)

On 12 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4811. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4811. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
No. 46259.

#### Protests 985428-G, etc., of Kaufmann Dept. Stores et al. (Pittsburgh, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2007176EN.01002702.xml

| 28.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/27

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/42/07

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2007/C 176/14)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition: EPSO/AST/42/07 — Assistants (AST1) having as their main language Irish in the secretarial field.

The notice of competition is published solely in the English and in the Irish edition of the Official Journal C 157 A dated 10.7.2007.

Full details can be found on the EPSO website: http://europa.eu/epso

---
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Quarterly Report of WTTJ Corp, on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Klamka, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31 2013, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and December 31, 2013 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of WTTJ Corp.  July 27, 2015By:/s/ Peter KlamkaPeter KlamkaChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 23.1

LOGO

FANGDA PARTNERS

LOGO

http://www.fangdalaw.com



|                       |      |      |       |         |                 |                    
|---------------------- | ---- | ---- | ----- | ------- | --------------- | -------------------
|LOGO                   |      | LOGO |       | E-mail: |                 | email@fangdalaw.com
|                       | LOGO |      | Tel.: |         | 86-21-2208-1166
|                       | LOGO |      | Fax:  |         | 86-21-5298-5577
|                       |      | LOGO |       | Ref.:   |                 | 06CF043            
|20/F, Kerry Center     |      |      |       |         |                 |                    
|1515 Nanjing West Road |      |      |       |         |                 |                    
|Shanghai 200040, PRC   |      |      |       |         |                 |                    

June 3, 2011

China Kanghui Holdings

No. 1-8 Tianshan Road

Xinbei District

Changzhou

Jiangsu Province 213022

Peoples Republic
of China

Dear Sirs,

We consent to
the reference to our firm under the headings of Risk Factors, Regulation and Taxation in China Kanghui Holdingss Annual Report on Form 20-F for year ended December 31, 2010, which will be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in the month of June 2011.



|                   
|-------------------
|Yours faithfully,  
|                   
|/s/ Fangda Partners
|Fangda Partners
# C_2008087EN.01000501.xml

| 8.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 April 2008

(2008/C 87/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5693 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 161,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78935 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3687 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5917 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 113,51 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9685 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,019 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6971 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,4568 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6808 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 32,388 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0071 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6977 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5804 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,2257 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9760 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1682 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 529,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,2705 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,9875 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2725 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 429,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0037 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,471 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,9900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,692 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6703 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5404 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5693

JPY

Japanese yen

161,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78935

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3687

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5917

ISK

Iceland króna

113,51

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9685

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,019

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6971

PLN

Polish zloty

3,4568

RON

Romanian leu

3,6808

SKK

Slovak koruna

32,388

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0071

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6977

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5804

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,2257

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9760

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1682

KRW

South Korean won

1 529,91

ZAR

South African rand

12,2705

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,9875

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2725

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 429,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0037

PHP

Philippine peso

65,471

RUB

Russian rouble

36,9900

THB

Thai baht

49,692

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6703

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5404

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 50949 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. JU A N P A B L O C A L V ILL O
- C A S T R O , al so kn ow n as Jua n P ablo C astr o, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 8 - CR- 1 0 5 7 - KC
- ALL B ef ore D eM O S S , P R A D O , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * Juan Pa bl o Calvil l o - Cas t r o a ppe al s t he 5 7- m o nt h s e nt e nc e i m po sed fo llo w in gh is g u iltyp le a co n v ic tio n fo rille g a l r e e n t r ya fte rd e p o r ta tio n , a vi ol at i o n o f 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 6 . H e a r g ue s t ha t t he s e nt e nc e i s g r e a t e rt han n ece ssa ryto m ee t th e sen ten ci n g go a l s ou tl i n ed in 18 U . S . C . § 35 5 3 (a) a n dtha t, inli g h t of Kim b ro ug h v . Un i t ed S t ate s , 552 U . S . 85 ( 200 7) , a presum pti on of reasona bl en ess does n otapp l y t o hi s w i t h i n - gu i del i n es s en t en ce because U . S. S. G . § 2L1. 2 i s nots upport ed byem pi r i c aldat a. Cal vi l l o a l so c ont ends t hat United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September

16, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 50949

2 t h e Sen t en ci n g G u i del i n es produ ce un w arran t ed sentenci n g di spari t i es because of t h e rand om avail abili t y of “fast t rack” program s. T h i s cou rt ha s con sist en tly rej ected C a lvil l o’ s “em p i ri ca l d a ta” arg u m en t, con cl u d i n g th a t Ki m br ough d o e s n o t q u e stio n th e presum pti onof reasonab l en ess anddo e s no tr e quir e di s t r i c to ra ppe l l at e c o ur t s t o i nde pe nde nt l y ana l yz e t he e m p ir ic a l g r o u n d in gb e h in de a c h i n d iv id u a l g u id e lin e . S ee Uni t e d S t at e s v. Mondrago n- Sa nt i ago , 5 6 4 F .3 d35 7 , 36 6

– 6 7 ( 5 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ), pet i t i on f or c ert . f i led (J u n e 2 4 , 2 0 0 9 ) (N o . 0 8 -1 1 0 9 9 ). A s C a lv illo co n c e d e s , th e a r g u m e n t t h a t h is sen ten ce w a s u n rea son a b l e b eca u se itresu l tedi n an u n w a rra n teddisp a ri ty b etw ee n de fen d a n ts t o w h om th e “fast track ” p rog ra m i s a va i l a b l e an dtho se to w h o m itis n o t a v a ila b le is fo r e c lo s e db ycu r r e n t c ir c u it p r e c e d e n t. Un i t ed S t ate s v. G om ez- Herrera , 5 2 3 F .3 d5 5 4 , 5 6 3 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 129 S. C t . 624 (2 0 0 8 ). C alvi l l o ha s not rebu t t ed the presum pti on t h a t h i s properl y cal cul ated g u id e lin e s s e n te n c e w a s re a s o n a b le . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. A lon zo , 435 F. 3d 551, 5 5 4

– 5 5 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ). T h e j u d g me n to f

t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.
Before the First Division,

August 11, 1939

No. 41923.

#### Protest 811887-G of Ph. Deutsch (New York).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of clothes brushes similar to those passed upon in *United States*v. *Heinrich*(26 C. C. P. A. 292, C. A. D. 30). They were therefore held dutiable at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1506 as claimed.
No. 49329.

#### Protests 675711-G, etc., of F. H. Shallus Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50510

__________________ JOSEPH BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus O.A. "BOB" BROOKSHIRE; ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-93-CV-149

- - - - - - - - - - September 21, 1995 Before JOLLY, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Joseph Bell moves this court for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (IFP). See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). "To proceed on appeal [IFP], a litigant must be economically eligible, and his appeal must not be frivolous." Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). Bell argues that error occurred by the denial of his motions for appointment of counsel. We review for an abuse ofNo. 95-50510 -2- discretion. Id. In the context of a civil rights suit, appointment of counsel is not required without the presence of "exceptional circumstances." Id. (citation and internal quotations omitted). Because an examination of the record confirms that no such circumstances existed in this case, we find no abuse of discretion. See id. at 262; Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th Cir. 1982). Bell does not challenge the findings of fact or conclusions of law underlying the final judgment in favor of the defendants. Therefore, any such challenge is deemed abandoned. Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th Cir. 1994). Bell has not presented a nonfrivolous issue. See Jackson , 811 F.2d at 261. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that his motion for leave to proceed on appeal IFP is DENIED. Because his appeal is frivolous, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of REVA Medical, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Robert StockmanRobert StockmanChairman and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)