alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, John J. Zimmer, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Transcat, Inc., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transcat, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 6, 2007/s/ John J. Zimmer  John J. Zimmer   Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION OF 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Melvin G. Brekhus, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: October 7, 2005 |  | /s/ M. G. Brekhus                    
|                       |  | Melvin G. Brekhus                    
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Texas Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Texas Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Jeffrey Rassas, the Chief Executive
Officer of Airware Labs Corp., certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Registrant
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and  results of operations of the Registrant.



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                    | Airware Labs Corp.                                               
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 5, 2016 |                                                                  
|                    | By:                                                              
|                    | Name:   Jeffrey Rassas
        Title:     Chief Executive Officer
|                    |                                                                  



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 76-5338.

#### DeVaughn *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2080

ROSE TCHAKOUNTE,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-397-773)

Submitted: February 23, 2005 Decided: March 8, 2005

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington,

Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Daniel E.

Goldman, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Rose Tchakounte, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen or reconsider its

denial of her motion to reconsider, construed by the Board as a

motion to reopen.

We review the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider

for an abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004); INS v.

Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); Stewart v. INS, 181 F.3d 587,

595 (4th Cir. 1999). Such motions are especially disfavored “in a

deportation proceeding, where, as a general matter, every delay

works to the advantage of the deportable alien who wishes merely to

remain in the United States.” Doherty, 502 U.S. at 323.

Tchakounte argues the Board should have reopened her

proceeding under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii)-(iii) (2004). We have

reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find

that the Board did not abuse its discretion.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We also

deny the Government’s motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





         To my knowledge,  this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the thirteen
weeks ended September 27, 2003,  fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the  information
contained  in  this  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and results of  operations  of Tasty  Baking  Company.  In
accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not
be deemed  "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange  Act, or otherwise
subject  to the  liability  of that  section,  and (B) shall not be deemed to be
incorporated  by  reference  into any  filing  under the  Securities  Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.


                                           By:     /S/ Charles P. Pizzi
                                                   -----------------------------
                                           Name:   Charles P. Pizzi
                                           Title:  President and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer



                                           By:     /S/ David S. Marberger
                                                   -----------------------------
                                           Name:   David S. Marberger
                                           Title:  Senior Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


Date:  November 10, 2003
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LILIA BELKOVA, individually and as successor trustee of the LAND TRUST AGREEMENT, NO:072003 DATED 2/9/04
, Appellant

,

v.

DEER RUN PROPERTY OWNERS ’ ASSOCIATION, INC.
, et al.

, Appellee s

.

No

. 4D2 2

- 72

[ August 23, 2023 ]

A ppeal from the C ounty Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; Sarah L. Shullman

, Judge ; L.T. Case No.
502017CC001472XXXXMB

.

Thomas L. Hunker and Sarah Hafeez of Hunker Appeals, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant

.

Steven R. Braten and Dina L. Rosenbaum of Rosenbaum, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for Appellee Deer Run Property Owners’ Association.

Anthony A. Arsali of Arsali LLC, Delray Beach, for Third Party
Purchaser Nicholas Arsali.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS
, D AMOORGIAN and G ERBER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
A90A0378.

#### CITY OF SWAINSBORO v. RINER.

(393 SE2d 519)

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Loree Riner entered a building owned by the City of Swainsboro, slipped and fell on the recently waxed floor, and was injured. It was raining and an indoor mat had been removed. The building was occupied by the Emanuel County Child Development Center (CDC), a non-profit corporation formed under the auspices of the city. Mrs. Riner was entering the building to obtain a free hot meal provided to senior citizens by the Emanuel County Nutrition Center. Suit was brought against the city, the CDC, and the cleaning service that waxed the floor. The city appeals from the denial of its motion for summary judgment. *Held:*

The city contends that it did not have possession or control over the premises which would place it on actual or constructive notice of *391the alleged defect.

Decided April 17, 1990.

*William H. McWhorter, Jr.,*for appellant.

*W. David Sims, Robert S. Reeves, Friedman, Haslam, Weiner & Ginsberg, Patrick T. O’Connor,*for appellee.

James O. Rountree, *pro se.*

Under OCGA § 44-7-1 (a), the landlord does not grant the tenant an estate. Instead, he has a mere right of use of the property. Under OCGA § 44-7-14, if the landlord has “fully parted with possession, [he] is not responsible to third persons for damages resulting from the negligence or illegal use of the premises by the tenant; provided, however, the landlord is responsible for damages arising from defective construction or for damages arising from the failure to keep the premises in repair.” See *Flagler Co. v. Savage,*258 Ga. 335, 337 (2) (368 SE2d 504) (1988); *Spence v. C & S Nat. Bank*195 Ga. App. 294 (_ SE2d_) (1990).

In reviewing the applicable statutory law, the court in *Thompson v. Crownover,*259 Ga. 126, 128 (377 SE2d 660) (1989), held that the public policy in this state favors the imposition of “landlord liability for damages to others from defective construction and failure to keep his premises in repair.”

In this case there was no written lease between the city and the CDC at the time Mrs. Riner was injured. A lease was drawn up and signed by the city, but it was not executed by the CDC, and its director was unaware of the lease’s terms until it was shown to her when her deposition was taken. There was evidence that the CDC was operated by a board of directors, one of whom was appointed by the city. Moreover, the city had purchased and maintained insurance on the premises until 12 days before Mrs. Riner’s fall. The city owned most of the personal property in the building, and had, on more than one occasion, paid for repairs to the premises. It did not, however, inspect the premises although it was free to do so at any time.

Applying the usual rules in ruling upon a motion for summary judgment, we find that the evidence presented to the trial court was sufficient to raise questions of fact requiring jury resolution as to whether the city had parted with possession of the premises and whether it had any knowledge (actual or constructive) of the alleged defect.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.*
(Reap. Dec. 9758)

#### M. Farris & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 774740; 752998; 796322.

(Decided July 27, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doüb,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached to and made part of this decision were called for hearing, and the cases were consequently ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> Tbe submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by tbe parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to tbe court, or by tbe court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or bis attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after tbe opposite party has bad opportunity to present evidence on tbe issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by tbe court on tbe record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the records in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 38997.

#### Protest 283226-G of Henri Bendel, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
# C_2007183EN.01001102.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 June 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 3 — Czech Republic) — Telefónica O2 Czech Republic as, formerly Český Telecom as v Czech On Line as

(Case C-64/06) (1)

1

(Electronic communications - Networks and services - Common regulatory framework - Dominant undertaking - Obligation of interconnection with other operators - Transitional provisions - Directive 97/33)

(2007/C 183/18)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Obvodní soud pro Prahu 3 — Czech Republic

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Telefónica O2 Czech Republic as, formerly Český Telecom as

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech On Line as

Defendant:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Obvodní soud pro Prahu 3 (Czech Republic) — Interpretation of provisions of Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 7) and Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33) — Obligation imposed by the national regulatory authority on an undertaking with significant power in the telecommunications market to conclude a contract with another operator on the interconnection of networks, following an administrative procedure which took place for the most part before accession to the EU and was not preceded by a market analysis procedure

Operative part of the judgment

In accordance with the transitional provisions of Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, the ‘Access Directive’) and of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (the ‘Framework Directive’), the Český telekomunikační úřad [Czech telecommunications regulatory authority] was entitled to consider the obligation, on the part of a telecommunications company with significant market power within the meaning of Directive 97/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 on interconnection in telecommunications with regard to ensuring universal service and interoperability through application of the principles of Open Network Provision (ONP), as amended by Directive 98/61/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 1998, to conclude a contract for the interconnection of its networks with that of another operator, subsequent to 1 May 2004, within the context of the provisions of Directive 97/33, as amended.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

1

---
No. 56598.

protests 737978-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Samuel S. Perry *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9355 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9355

      To enact House Resolution 895, One Hundred Tenth Congress, 
 (establishing the Office of Congressional Ethics) into permanent law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 13, 2024

Ms. Porter (for herself and Mr. Pappas) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To enact House Resolution 895, One Hundred Tenth Congress, 
 (establishing the Office of Congressional Ethics) into permanent law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Legislating and Ethical 
Accountability Now Act'' or the ``CLEAN Act''.

SEC. 2. ENACTING HOUSE RESOLUTION 895 INTO PERMANENT LAW.

    House Resolution 895, One Hundred Tenth Congress, is hereby enacted 
into permanent law, except that--
            (1) the Office of Congressional Ethics shall be treated as 
        a standing committee of the House for purposes of section 
        202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 
        4301(i));
            (2) references to the Committee on Standards of Official 
        Conduct shall be construed as references to the Committee on 
        Ethics;
            (3) the second sentence of section 1(b)(6)(A) shall not 
        apply;
            (4) members subject to section 1(b)(6)(B) may be 
        reappointed for a second additional term;
            (5) any individual who is the subject of a preliminary 
        review or second-phase review by the board shall be informed of 
        the right to be represented by counsel and invoking that right 
        should not be held negatively against them; and
            (6) the Office may not take any action that would deny any 
        person any right or protection provided under the Constitution 
        of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
June 6, 2013 

Catherine Dobbs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Railroad Administration 

THPO#: 0011849 

 

Re: All Aboard Florida Intercity Passenger Rail Service 

 

Dear Ms. Dobbs, 

The Seminole Tribe of Florida’s Tribal Historic Preservation Office (STOF-THPO) received the 

U.S. Department of Transportation scoping meeting invitation regarding the above mentioned 

project on May 6, 2013. Although we were not able to attend the scoping meeting, the STOFTHPO is interested in receiving future updates about this project, including the draft EIS when it 

is completed. 

Thank you for the opportunity to review the information that has been sent to date regarding this 

project. Please reference THPO-0011849 for all future correspondence. 

Sincerely, 

Alison E. Swing, MS 

Compliance Analyst 

Seminole Tribe of Florida 

30290 Josie Billie Hwy, PMB 1004 

Clewiston, Florida 33440 

863.983.6549 ext. 12217