alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8948 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8948

To amend title 18, United States Code, to limit the ability to assess a 
  fee for health care services for prisoners, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2024

Ms. Norton (for herself and Mr. Valadao) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to limit the ability to assess a 
  fee for health care services for prisoners, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Bureau of Prisons Medical 
Care Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. NO FEE FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES FOR PRISONERS.

    Section 4048 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
    ``(b) Fees for Health Care Services.--In the case of health care 
services provided to a prisoner in connection with a health care visit 
that results from an injury inflicted on a prisoner by another 
prisoner, the Director, in accordance with this section and with such 
regulations as the Director shall promulgate to carry out this section, 
may assess and collect a fee in connection with each such health care 
visit, from the account of the prisoner who inflicted the injury, as 
determined by the Director.'';
            (2) by striking subsection (c); and
            (3) in subsection (e), by striking ``or whether the 
        prisoner qualifies under an exclusion under this section''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 53153.

#### Leo Popper & Sons et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60824-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Executive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Cascade Microtech, Inc. 
 2008 Executive Compensation Plan 
 for the Six-Month Period Ending December 31, 2008 
 Participants 
  

			
	Geoff Wild	  	Chief Executive Officer and President
	Steven Sipowicz	  	Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
	Eric Strid	  	Chief Technology Officer
	John Pence	  	Vice President, Business Development
	Willis Damkroger	  	Vice President, Sales and Customer Support
	Mike Kondrat	  	Vice President, Marketing
	Anand Nambiar	  	Vice President, Operations

 Performance Criteria 
 Bonuses for these participants are calculated on a percentage of their base salary based on attainment of planned levels of net income, operating income, revenue and goals and objectives. Determinations as to whether the performance targets
have been met are made on a six-month basis. 
 This table lists the portion of the total bonus payout that is based on the different performance measures,
for each executive: 
  

													
	 	  	CorporateMetrics	 
	 	  	
Net
income	 	 	
Operating
income	 	 	

Revenue	 	 	Individual
goals and
objectives	 
	 Chief Executive Officer
	  	30	%	 	40	%	 	—  	 	 	30	%
	 Chief Financial Officer
	  	30	%	 	40	%	 	—  	 	 	30	%
	 Chief Technology Officer
	  	—  	 	 	70	%	 	—  	 	 	30	%
	 VP, Business Development
	  	—  	 	 	70	%	 	—  	 	 	30	%
	 VP, Sales and Customer Support
	  	—  	 	 	50	%	 	20	%	 	30	%
	 VP, Marketing
	  	—  	 	 	50	%	 	20	%	 	30	%
	 VP, Operations
	  	—  	 	 	70	%	 	—  	 	 	30	%

 The payout for the operating income, net income and revenue portion will be: 
  

	 	•	 	 100% payout for achievement of 100% of the planned consolidated operating income, net income or revenue (“target”) 


  

	 	•	 	 Linear with zero payout for metric at 50% of target to 200% payout cap at 150% of target or higher 


  

	 	•	 	 Zero for operating income, net income and revenue below 50% of target 


 The payout for the goals and objectives portion will be proportional to the fraction of the goals and objectives completed. A set of objectives has been formulated by consensus of the executive management team at the
beginning of the six month period.
# Certification Status by Host

# Certification Status by Train
Before the Second Division,

January 18, 1940

No. 43031.

#### Protests 811638-G, etc., of F. W. Woolworth Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20) bridge table pencil holders plated with silver were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2010-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName: Jason KulasTitle:   Chief Financial OfficerDate:   September 20, 2013
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00279

- CR

Freddy Perez

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

o f Tarrant County (1328962D )

December 10, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Anne Gardner

____________ Justice Anne Gardner
Before the Second Division,

September 4, 1942

No. 47527.

#### Protests 959072-G (A), etc., of A. W. Fenton Co. et al. (New York).

*409Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Green*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 173, C. D. 599) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1750 as flax waste used chiefly for paper making was sustained.
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                                      |  |                                   |     |      
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | --- | -----
|Name of entity and place of jurisdiction              |  | Voting SecuritiesOwned Percentage |    
|PennantPark Floating Rate Funding I, LLC (Delaware)   |  |                                   | 100 | %    
|PFLT Funding II, LLC (Delaware)                       |  |                                   | 100 | %    
|PFLT Investment Holdings, LLC (Delaware)              |  |                                   | 100 | %    
|GMC Television Broadcasting Holdings, Inc. (Delaware) |  |                                   | 100 | % (1)
|GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC (Delaware)           |  |                                   | 100 | % (1)
|Solutions Capital G.P., LLC (Delaware)                |  |                                   | 100 | %    
|Solutions Capital I, L.P. (Delaware)                  |  |                                   | 100 | %    



|(1) | The entity is directly owned by PFLT Funding II, LLC, which is wholly-owned by us.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



1
# C_2007297EN.01003501.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/35

---

Order of the President of the Court of 29 August 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-146/07) (1)

1

(2007/C 297/67)

Language of the case: Swedish

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.

1

---
*After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R.

34.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. This order and

judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case,

res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of

orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the

terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

DEC 18 2002

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

DARRON EDWARDS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

DAVID MCKUNE; STATE OF

KANSAS,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 02-3208

(D.C. No. 01-CV-3425-DES)

(Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, HENRY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

Darron Edwards, a pro se state prisoner, filed this petition for habeas

corpus relief on October 18, 2001, challenging his state court conviction in 1992. 

The district court dismissed the application upon concluding that it was barred

under the one year period of limitation imposed by the Antiterrorism and
-2-

Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), enacted April 24, 1996. In so holding, the

district court recognized that under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2) the period is tolled

during the time a properly filed application for state post-conviction relief is

pending, and held that under this tolling provision the limitation period began

running on May 31, 1996, and expired one year later on May 31, 1997. 

We grant Mr. Edwards’ motion to supplement the record regarding the

tolling of the statute of limitations. We acknowledge that for some of the

intervening time, various pending motions tolled the statute of limitations. 

However, because the last of these was decided by an order of the Kansas

Supreme Court on June 6, 1997, even if the entire time up to that point had been

tolled, it still would have expired by June 6, 1998. Thus, Mr. Edwards’ motion

for state post conviction relief filed February 12, 1999 would itself have no

tolling effect.

This petition for habeas relief was filed October 18, 2001, well past the

expiration of the limitation period. Accordingly, we GRANT Mr. Edwards’

motion to supplement the record, DENY his request for a certificate of

appealability, and DISMISS the appeal. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Circuit Judge
Exhibit 35.1





AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION


ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE


PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE


SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND


ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB








I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Compliance Officer of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the "Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer" and "Sponsor") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of October 1, 2010 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as successor to American Honda Receivables Corp., as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2010-3 Owner Trust as follows:





(i)
A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2011, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.




(ii)
To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14thday of June, 2011.








/s/ Paul C. Honda


Paul C. Honda


Vice President, Assistant Secretary, and Compliance Officer


(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
CC - Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898









	
	CERTIFICATIONS







		
	 
	I, Bradley J. Moynes certify that:




1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F for Black Diamond Brands Corporation; 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

	
	Date: August 8, 2008







		
	 
	/s/ Bradley J. Moynes

Bradley J. Moynes

Chief Executive Officer
4/12/2016

FRA – Office of Railroad Policy and Development

Moving America Forward

F E D E R A L R A I L R O A D A D M I N I S T R A T I O N

1

Funding Availability: FAST Act + FY16 

NHTSA Ad 

Campaign

TIGER 

Grants 

Section 

130

FY16: $25M

• FY16: $350M

• FY17: $230M

Surface 

Transportation 

Block Grant

FY16: $11.1B

Freight and 

Highway 

Projects 

FY16: $800M

Railroad 

Safety Grants

FY16: $500M

FY16: $6.5M
# C_2009010EN.01000102.xml

| 15.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5295 — Teva/Barr)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 10/02)

On 19 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5295. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5295. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

BASIL GIBBS,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-0017

PHILADELPHIA POLICE JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

DEPARTMENT, et al., MAGISTRATE JUDGE NORAH MCCANN KING

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Order filed March 22, 2013, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this case.

Date: March 22, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00017-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 03/22/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
770 L Street, Suite 620, Sacramento, CA 95814 • T: (916) 324-1541 • F: (916) 322-0827 • www.hsr.ca.gov

November 17, 2016

Ms. Sarah Feinberg

Administrator

Federal Railroad Administration

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Request from the California High-Speed Rail Authority (“Authority”) to withdraw Two 

Waiver Requests from the Federal Railroad Administration’s (“FRA”) Buy America 

Requirements

Dear Administrator Fienberg:

The California High-Speed Rail Authority (the “Authority”) withdraws its September 16, 2016, 

requests for the following two waivers from the Federal Railroad Administration’s (“FRA”) Buy 

America Requirements: 

A) a waiver to permit the manufacturer of the Authority’s new Tier III High-Speed Trains 

("Authority’s Trains") to purchase and incorporate into the Authority’s Trainsets certain 

components that are not manufactured in the United States. Specifically, these 

components were A – Car Body Shell: (1) car body shells (shell structure/frame-end, 

floor, roof, side); (2) integrated cab/CEM structure; (3) vehicle paintwork; and B - Brake 

System: (4) brake control unit; (5) disc brake equipment; (6) tread brake equipment/tread 

cleaners; (7) brake valves and (8) parking brake units and; 

B) a waiver to the manufacture and assembly of complete HSR trainset bogies (also 

known as trucks).

The Authority will proceed with the trainset manufacturing solicitation process that requires full 

compliance with Buy America requirements. This process will include scoring incentives for 

proposals submitted that do not require Buy America waivers. The Authority believes this is the 

best approach to encourage and afford opportunities for the United States manufacturing industry 

to fulfill this important role in the manufacturing of all components needed for high-speed rail 

trainsets.
Please direct questions, comments, and dispositions to:

Thomas Fellenz

Chief Counsel

California High-Speed Rail Authority

770 L Street, Suite 800

Sacramento, CA 95814 USA

Thank you for your careful consideration of our request. 

Sincerely,

Jeff Morales

Chief Executive Officer

cc: F. Vacca

G. Giovinazzi

TF/JP/slc
District Contact District Contact

1 Lou Frangella 5 Carolyn Cook

Lou.Frangella@dot.gov Carolyn.Cook@dot.gov

(617) 686-7374 (817) 312-9714

2 Rodney Whaley 6 Howard Gillespie

rodney.whaley@dot.gov Howard.Gillespie@dot.gov

(610) 662-1247 (816) 308-8482

3 Howard Gillespie 7 Dale Davidson

Howard.Gillespie@dot.gov Dale.Davidson@dot.gov

(816) 308-8482 (206) 963-7143

4 Tina Blumenberg 8 Tammy Wagner

Tina.blumenberg@dot.gov Tammy.Wagner@dot.gov

(312) 502-1605 (815) 715-6034

 Headquarters

 James Payne

 James.Payne@dot.gov 

 (202) 493-6005
Compliance Dates: Emergency 

Notification System

Compliance dates 234.317:

 317(a): If no system whatsoever is in place, must be fully compliant by September 1, 

2015;

 317(b): Railroads that have an ENS system but telephone service does not conform to the 

requirements in 303 or 307 must comply by March 1, 2014;

 317(c)(1)(i): Signs that are at least 60 sq. in with lettering at least 3⁄4” and the lettering for 

the purpose of the sign is at least 3/8” kept for useful life of sign;

 317(c)(ii): Signs that are 60 sq. in. but do not meet the above lettering requirements must 

conform by September 1, 2017;

 317(c)iii: Signs that are less than 60 sq. in. must conform by September 1, 2015;

 317(d): If a railroad has signs in place, but the placement does not conform to 311, the 

railroad must conform by September 1, 2017.

 Note: If a railroad replaces a sign for any reason prior to these deadlines, the sign must 

conform to 309 and 311 (size and placement).

 317(e): Railroads with record keeping that does not conform to 313 or 315 must comply 

by March 1, 2014.