alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




(Effective July 1, 2008)




     Effective July 1, 2008, non-employee directors of Cardiogenesis Corporation are entitled to
receive the following compensation for their service on the Board and committees of the Board:



     1. Each non-employee director will receive an annual retainer of $12,000 (payable quarterly)
and a per meeting fee of $2,500 for each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board of
Directors attended in person by such director ($1,250 for regularly scheduled quarterly meetings
attended telephonically) as well as reimbursement for travel expenses associated with attendance at
any such meeting. The Chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000
per year, payable quarterly.



     2. In addition, the chairmen of the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and
Corporate Governance Committee will receive an additional annual retainer of $5,500, $5,500 and
$2,000 per year (payable quarterly). Members of the Audit Committee,
other than the chairman, will
receive an additional annual retainer of $2,500 (payable quarterly).



     3. Each member of the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate
Governance Committee will receive a per meeting fee of $1,000 for each regularly scheduled separate
meeting of such Committee attended in person or telephonically.



     4. Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s 1996 Director Stock Option Plan, as currently in
effect, each non-employee director of the Company receives an option to purchase 22,500 shares of
Common Stock upon their election to the Board of Directors and subsequent option grants of 7,500
shares upon their re-election each year (provided that such re-election is at least six months after
the date of initial election to the Board of Directors). The exercise price is 100% of the closing
price of the Company’s common stock on the date prior to the grant date. Initial option grants vest
as to one-third of the shares on each yearly anniversary of the grant date until fully vested.
Subsequent option grants vest in full on the first anniversary of the date of grant. If the
non-employee director ceases to serve as a director for any reason, vesting shall cease as of the
date of such termination and shall be exercisable for 60 days following termination except in the
case of death or disability in which case the option shall be exercisable for a period of 12 months
following termination as a director.
# C_2007183EN.01002904.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 May 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-394/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 183/54)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 2.12.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 13.1





Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Seawell Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jørgen Rasmussen, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Jørgen Rasmussen


Name: Jørgen Rasmussen


Title: Chief Executive Officer, Seawell Management Limited


Date: April 26, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Appendix B-4 

USCG Section 9 Jurisdictional Checklist 
Environmental Procedures Manual

Environmental Analysis Bureau

February 2001

ATTACHMENT 4.A.J. USCG Section 9 Permit Applicability Guidance

U. S. COAST GUARD JURISDICTION CHECKLIST

STEP 1. Does the project involve bridge work?

• YES, go to Step 2. • NO, end. USCG has no jurisdiction.

STEP 2. Is the waterway considered navigable by USCG?

• Presently used or susceptible to use in its natural condition or by reasonable

improvement to be used as a means to TRANSPORT SUBSTANTIAL

INTERSTATE COMMERCE.

If YES, considered NAVIGABLE; must assess need for Section 9

permit. Go to PERMIT APPLICABILITY table.

If NO, continue.

• Tidal waterway (subject to the ebb and flow of tide).

If YES, GO TO STEP 3 to determine if exempt by FHWA under

Section 123(b) of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation

Act of 1987.

If NO, end. USCG has no jurisdiction.

STEP 3. Is the project federally funded?

• YES, go to Step 4. • NO, considered NAVIGABLE; must

assess need for Section 9 permit. Go to

PERMIT APPLICABILITY table.

STEP 4. Is the waterway navigable by vessels in excess of 21 feet in length?

• YES, considered NAVIGABLE; • NO, waterway can be considered a minor

 must assess need for Section 9 tidal waterway and the project can be

 permit. Go to PERMIT exempted by FHWA.

 APPLICABILITY table.

• If the project involves bridge work over a waterway that is considered NAVIGABLE by

USCG, review the PERMIT APPLICABILITY table to determine if a SECTION 9 permit is

required. If a permit is required, prepare a permit application package and submit to the

USCG.
USCG SECTION 9 PERMIT APPLICABILITY

• New or Replacement Bridge, including

causeway

• SECTION 9 PERMIT REQUIRED

• Bridge Modification resulting in: 

• Change of Width (±)

• Change in Horizontal or Vertical

Clearance, including:

 installation of fender systems on piers

where none existed before

pier or abutment stabilization work such

as pouring collars or encapsulating a

substructure resulting in a change of

horizontal clearances

superstructure work that results in a

change (±) of vertical clearances

• Major Change of Appearance

• SECTION 9 PERMIT REQUIRED

• Change of Bridge Structure Type • SECTION 9 PERMIT REQUIRED

• Bridge Rehabilitation Projects • NO SECTION 9 PERMIT REQUIRED

• COORDINATE WITH USCG

• ADD NOTES TO CONTRACT

PROPOSAL
U.S. COAST GUARD SECTION 9 PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE

Application Package Contents:

1. Location Map

2. Plan & Elevation View of Bridge (81⁄2" x 11" sheet)

3. Section 401 Water Quality Certification from NYSDEC

4. Coastal Zone Management Certification from NYSDOS if in a mapped Coastal Area

5. Approved Environmental Document (Categorical Exclusion, EA/FONSI, EIS)

6. Official Orders (Authorization to Apply) 

Processing Time for Section 9 Permit:

1st Coast Guard District, Governors Island, NYC -- 8 to 12 months 

eastern portion of New York west to Canajoharie

9th Coast Guard District, Cleveland, OH -- 3 to 6 months

western portion of New York west of Canajoharie
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan N. Harris, Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Duke Energy Gas Transmission Services, LLC, General Partner of Texas Eastern, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Texas Eastern.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Alan N. Harris                                                                                                                                       
|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|                   |  |  |  | Alan N. Harris Group Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer Duke Energy Gas Transmission Services, LLC General Partner of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP



16
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mecox Lane Limited (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred Beichun Gu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 29, 2011



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Alfred Beichun Gu  
|Name:  |  | Alfred Beichun Gu      
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
No. 51151.

#### Protests 836136-K, etc., of J. L. Hudson Co. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Wild wealth: the riches of native plants

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Wild wealth: the riches of native plants 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Riches of native plants 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Park Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. National Park Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  160 × 42 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  index.cpd 

Part of: Wild wealth: the riches of native plants (2 objects)     Next

Wild wealth: the riches of native plants

Wild wealth: the riches of native plants

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9268 

To direct the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration 

to update security screening requirements for certain covered air carrier 

operations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2024 

Mr. LANGWORTHY (for himself, Mr. VEASEY, Ms. NORTON, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. 

JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. D’ESPOSITO, Ms. CRAIG, Mr. LAWLER, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, Ms. SCHOLTEN, Mr. GARBARINO, Mrs. CHAVEZDEREMER, and Mr. NADLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Transportation Security 

Administration to update security screening requirements 

for certain covered air carrier operations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safer Skies Act of 

5 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9268 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANDING SECURITY SCREENING REQUIREMENTS 

2 FOR CERTAIN COVERED AIR CARRIER OPER3 ATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 360 days after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act, all covered air carrier 

6 operations shall be subject to section 1544.101(a) of title 

7 49, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulation) 

8 (commonly known as the ‘‘Aircraft Operator Standard Se9 curity Program’’). 

10 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Administrator of the 

11 Transportation Security Administration shall revise any 

12 rules, guidance, or policies of such Administration to com13 ply with the requirements in this section. 

14 (c) COVERED AIR CARRIER OPERATIONS DE15 FINED.—The term ‘‘covered air carrier operations’’ means 

16 air carrier operations that— 

17 (1) operate under parts 135 and 380 of title 

18 14, Code of Federal Regulations; 

19 (2) conduct common carriage passenger-car20 rying operations for compensation or hire for which 

21 the certificate holder or a representative of such cer22 tificate holder— 

23 (A) offers individual seats in advance; and 

24 (B) provides publicly available schedules 

25 that include the departure location, departure 

26 time, and arrival location of operations; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9268 IH

1 (3) operate airplanes with a passenger-seat con2 figuration of more than 9 seats; and 

3 (4) do not enplane or deplane in a checkpoint 

4 managed by the Transportation Security Adminis5 tration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT ****15.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-172178 on Form S-8 of our reports dated June 28, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements of TAL Education Group, its subsidiaries, its variable interest entities (the “VIEs”) and its VIEs’ subsidiaries (collectively the “Group”), and the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of TAL Education Group for the year ended February 28, 2013.

 

 
| /s/   Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Beijing,   the People’s Republic of China                  |
| June 28, 2013                                              |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v MICHAEL J. SMITH, Sergeant, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

20 USCMA 444, 43 CMR 284

*445No. 23,411

April 2, 1971

*Commander E. M. Fulton, Jr.,*JAGC, USN, and *Captain Harry N. LembecJc,*USMCR, were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Michael F. Fasanaro, Jr.,*JAGC, USN, and *Lieutenant Thomas F. Bastow,*JAGC, USNR, were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The Court granted'two issues in this case. One concerns the failure of the military judge to inform the appellant that if he was represented by civilian counsel his detailed military counsel could continue to act' as an associate counsel if Smith so desired. United States v Turner, 20 USCMA 167, 43 CMR 7 (1970), decided this issue against the appellant. Both in *Turner*and in the instant case, appointed military counsel represented the appellants.

Failure of the military judge to obtain *in writing*the appellant’s request for military judge alone requires reversal of the appellant’s conviction, however. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970). Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed and the findings and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. Another trial may be ordered.

Ferguson, Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part):

I concur in part and dissent in part.

I agree that reversal of the accused’s conviction is required because the military judge failed to obtain *in writing*the appellant’s request for trial by military judge alone. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970). However, I also believe that reversal is required due to the failure of the military judge to inform the appellant that if he was represented by civilian counsel his detailed military counsel could continue to act as an associate counsel, if Smith so desired, for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Turner, 20 USCMA 167, 43 CMR 7 (1970).

Quinn, Chief Judge

(dissenting):

I adhere to the views set out in my dissent in United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970), and I would affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.
#### Aird & Watson, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6345.

Entry No. 15989, etc.

Invoices dated Kidderminster, England, January 19, 1942, etc.

Certified February 11, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 7, 1942.

(Decided September 10, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kindgom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (e)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

On the established facts, I hold export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § Í402 (d)),to be the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question, and that such statutory values thereof are the appraised values,- less additions made by the importers on entry because of advances in similar cases.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1,000,000

<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                        104
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                0
<PP&E>                                                      2,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                              1,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             13,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           0
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                       15
<OTHER-SE>                                                  1,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                1,767
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            1,438
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               83
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (76)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 (22)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (54)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (54)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0




</TABLE>