alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL05-1-002]


Entergy Services, Inc.; Notice of Compliance Filing

March 27, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 22, 2007, Entergy Services, Inc. 
(Entergy) acting as agent for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. tendered for 
filing in compliance with the Commission's February 20, 2007 Order to 
reclassify certain facilities identified in the Interconnection and 
Operating Agreement between Entergy Arkansas and Union Power Partners, 
L.P. as network upgrades eligible for transmission credits and interest 
on such credits.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#efa9aabdaca0818386818abc9a9f9f809d9baf898a9d8cc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d3b382f3e3213111413182e080d0d120f093d1b180f1e531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 12, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-5990 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### T. D. Downing Co. *v.*United States

No. 6696.

Entry No. 1985, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, August 26, 1941, etc.

Certified August 26, 1941', etc.

Entered at Boston, Mass., October 1, 1941, etc.

(Decided January 3, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olives, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Rescission of Order of 
Revocations

    Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following 
license is being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant 
to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 409) and 
the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean 
Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.
    License Number: 017381NF.
    Name: HPK Logistics (USA) Inc.
    Address: 18042 Cortney Ct., 2nd Floor, City of Industry, CA 91748.
    Order Published: FR: 02/14/07 (Volume 72, No. 30, Pg. 7038).

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
 [FR Doc. E7-6854 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
No. 54200.

#### Mark Cross Co. *v.*United States,

protests 145289-K, 146629-K, and 149952-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)



I am the Principal Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of IPOWorld, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-K").



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-K fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





|Dated: December 18, 2013 | By:/s/ Theo Baldi                                                                      
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Theo Baldi
        Its: Principal Executive Officer
        Principal Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v THOMAS L. G. WITHERSPOON, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

12 USCMA 409, 30 CMR 409

No. 14,402

Decided June 2, 1961

*Lieutenant Colonel R. G. Coyne,*USMC, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel James E. Stauffer,*USMC, was on the brief for Ap-pellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CuRiAM:

This case is before us for á second time. Originally, we reversed the decision of the board of review and returned the record of trial for reassessment of sentence in order to purge the harm occasioned by the president’s erroneous instructions on the maximum sentence. United States v. Witherspoon, 12 USCMA 177, 30 CMR 177. When the matter was again before the board of review, it reconsidered the question of the sentence to be approved without affording the accused his right to be represented by counsel before the board. This action was prejudicial and requires a new hearing before the board of review. United States v Darring, 9 USCMA 651, 26 CMR 431; United States v Bell, 11 USCMA 306, 29 CMR 122.

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A new hearing will be granted by the board of review with respect to the question of the sentence to be approved in this case in light of our original mandate, and the accused will be afforded the opportunity to be represented there by appellate defense counsel.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20235

Summary Calendar

MICHAEL W. THOMAS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(CA H 95-1306)

August 14, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael W. Thomas, a Texas state prisoner, appeals an adverse summary

judgment in his civil rights action. Thomas contends that the district court erred

by granting summary judgment for Wayne Scott; that Scott was deliberately
1Thomas v. Scott, No. H-95-1306 (S.D.Tex. Feb. 28, 1996).

2Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

3Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 901 (1990), and

cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1069 (1991).

2

indifferent to his safety and failed to protect him from other prisoners; that prison

officials retaliated against him by assigning him to the garden squad; and that the

district court erred by granting summary judgment without ruling on his motion to

compel production of documentary evidence.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and we find no

reversible error regarding the grant ofsummary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm

the summary judgment for essentially the reasonsrelied upon by the district court.1

Thomas has failed to show plain error regarding whether prison officials retaliated

against him when they assigned him to the garden squad.2 The district court did not

abuse its discretion by granting summary judgment without ruling on Thomas’s

discovery request.3 Thomas’s pleadings indicate no genuine issues of material fact.

Finally, because of today’s disposition, Thomas’s request for appointment of

counsel to assist him in discovery is DENIED.

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
Case: 2:11-cv-01023-EAS-TPK Doc #: 31 Filed: 08/21/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T14:11:24-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# C_2007223EN.01000902.xml

| 22.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/9

---

Action brought on 8 August 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-382/07)

(2007/C 223/12)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell and M. Telles Romão, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/51/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/51/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive into national law expired on 31 December 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 164, p. 164.

1

---
# C_2008089EN.01000901.xml

| 10.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 April 2008

(2008/C 89/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5726 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 161,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4602 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79770 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3622 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5935 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 112,84 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9410 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,098 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6969 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,4551 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6695 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 32,402 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0295 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6941 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6022 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,2513 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9766 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1696 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 535,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,3024 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 11,0109 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2650 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 483,65 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9985 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,499 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 37,0300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,940 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6645 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6035 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5726

JPY

Japanese yen

161,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4602

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79770

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3622

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5935

ISK

Iceland króna

112,84

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9410

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,098

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6969

PLN

Polish zloty

3,4551

RON

Romanian leu

3,6695

SKK

Slovak koruna

32,402

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0295

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6941

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6022

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,2513

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9766

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1696

KRW

South Korean won

1 535,49

ZAR

South African rand

12,3024

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

11,0109

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2650

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 483,65

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9985

PHP

Philippine peso

65,499

RUB

Russian rouble

37,0300

THB

Thai baht

49,940

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6645

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6035

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 35.1




Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.




I, Pierre Boutros, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York corporation (the “Trustee”), state:




(a) A review of the Trustee’s activities for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Trustee’s performance under the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated July 15, 2010 between MS Structured Asset Corp. as depositor (the “Depositor”) and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary, in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor and the Trustee (as amended in each such case, the “Trust Agreement”), has been made under my supervision.




(b)  To the best of my knowledge and based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for CMT Linked Trust Units Series 2010-01











The Bank of New York Mellon, as TrusteeDate: March 2, 2012

/s/Pierre BoutrosPierre BoutrosVice President
```

[111th Congress Public Law 346]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 3622]]

Public Law 111-346
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To extend certain expiring provisions providing enhanced protections for 
           servicemembers relating to mortgages and mortgage 
           foreclosure. <<NOTE: Dec. 29, 2010 -  [S. 4058]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Helping Heroes 
Keep Their Homes Act of 2010.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 50 USC app. 501 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helping Heroes Keep Their Homes Act 
of 2010''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ENHANCED PROTECTIONS FOR SERVICEMEMBERS 
                    RELATING TO MORTGAGES AND MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE 
                    UNDER SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT.

    Paragraph (2) of section 2203(c) of the Housing and Economic 
Recovery Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-289) <<NOTE: 50 USC app. 533.>> is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``December 31, 2010'' and inserting 
        ``December 31, 2012''; and
            (2) by striking ``January 1, 2011'' and inserting ``January 
        1, 2013''.

    Approved December 29, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 4058:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Dec. 22, considered and passed Senate and House.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Sharkey, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

The foregoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.

/s/ John G. Sharkey
    ----------------------------
    Vice President-Finance
    and Chief Financial Officer

    January 9, 2009
# C_2007211EN.01001701.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/17

---

Action brought on 13 June 2007 — Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-286/07)

(2007/C 211/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by requiring the submission of an excerpt from the seller's entry on the commercial register for the purpose of registering vehicles which have previously been registered in another Member State, where no such excerpt is required for vehicles which have previously been registered in Luxembourg, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by requiring the submission of an excerpt from the seller's entry on the commercial register for the purpose of registering vehicles which have previously been registered in another Member State, where no such excerpt is required for vehicles which have previously been registered in Luxembourg, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC;

| — | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its action, the Commission criticises the conditions imposed by the defendant for the registration of second-hand vehicles which have previously been registered in another Member State.

By making the registration of these vehicles in Luxembourg subject to additional document checks and, in particular, the submission of an official excerpt from the entry on the commercial register of the vehicle's seller, the defendant has effectively made it less attractive to import vehicles which had previously been registered in another Member State and is therefore hindering the free movement of these goods.

This barrier to trade, prohibited by Article 28 EC, is all the more serious as it predominantly affects imported vehicles, with second-hand vehicles that had previously been registered in Luxembourg not apparently subject to the same document checks.

Besides, the reasons that the defendant has given for this barrier to trade are not very convincing, particular in so far as the defendant already has important means of control at its disposal to ensure that the vehicles at issue have not been stolen and, in any event, less radical measures than an outright refusal to register the vehicle can be envisaged if the requisite excerpt from the commercial register is unavailable, such as, for example, suspension of the registration procedure for the time required by the administrative authorities to run checks.

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The Earth needs you join our team, experiences that make a world of difference

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The Earth needs you join our team, experiences that make a world of difference 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Soil Conservation Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 91-463-P. "Issued March 1991." 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of Agriculture 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  PA ; 1467; Program aid (United States. Dept. of Agriculture) ; 1467. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  144 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -