Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices 2553 

concerns in addition to national 

concerns. 

The survey cannot be used to make 

recommendations about management 

actions because (1) the management 

problem has not yet been defined 

(except in the case of Valley Forge 

NHP), and (2) no questions were asked 

about potential actions. No other 

unsolicited comments were received for 

this one-time information collection as 

a result of the Federal Register notice. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Identifying Capacity for Local 

Community Participation in Wildlife 

Management Planning: White-tailed 

Deer in Northeastern NPS Units. 

OMB Number: To be requested. 

Expiration Date: To be requested. 

Type of Request: New collection. 

Description of need: NPS and DOI 

policies have begun to emphasize on 

civic engagement and public 

participation in park management (NPS 

Director’s Order 75A), as well as 

communication and collaboration with 

local communities (NPS Director’s 

Order 52A). Discussions with NPS 

natural resource managers indicate a 

need for tools to better understand local 

community residents and ways to 

engage them in management and 

planning, especially in situations where 

communities may be impacted by NPS 

Management decisions. This study will 

provide insight on local stakeholder 

opinions and experiences related to the 

role of parks in deer and other wildlife 

management, their understanding of 

deer issues and ways to address them in 

parks, and the influence of public input 

in wildlife management in parks. This 

information will assist park staff in 

improving communication with the 

public in the event that these parks 

consider managing impacts related to 

deer in the future. Insights from this 

study also should enhance NPS ability 

to respond to other natural resource 

management issues that involve local 

communities. 

The goal of this study is to identify 

criteria for public involvement strategies 

that successfully engage the public in 

management planning, particularly with 

respect to deer management. Collection 

of these data will assist NPS managers 

in fulfilling recent policy directives for 

public participation by indicating how 

to adapt participatory processes to best 

meet the specific management and 

stakeholder contexts. Should these data 

not be collected, future participatory 

processes will be undertaken without 

the benefit of research showing the 

relevance to public-participation 

processes to audiences. This could 

result in receiving public input that is 

not representative of the public at large 

or designing participatory processes that 

are more likely to incite controversy 

than identify constructive solutions. 

Specific requirements regarding the 

information that must be submitted by 

offerors in response to a prospectus 

issued by NPS are contained in sections 

403(4), (5), (7), and (8) of the Act. 

Comments are invited on: (1) The 

practical utility of the information being 

gathered; (2) the accuracy of the burden 

hour estimate; (3) ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (40 

ways to minimize the burden to 

respondents, including the use of 

automated information collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology. Before including your 

address, phone number, e-mail address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Bureau Form Number: None. 

Frequency of Collection: On occasion. 

Description of respondents: Residents 

of communities near: The Potomac 

Gorge area of Chesapeake and Ohio 

Canal National Historical Park; Fire 

Island National Seashore; Morristown 

National Historical Park; Prince William 

Forest Park; and Valley Forge National 

Historical Park. 

Automated data collection: This 

information will be collected via mailback questionnaire. Telephone 

interviews will be conducted with a 

small number of non-respondents to the 

mail survey. No automated data 

collection will take place. 

Estimated average number of 

respondents: 2500 (2000 respondents for 

mail survey; 500 respondents for 

telephone interviews). 

Estimated average number of 

responses: 2500 (2000 responses for 

mail survey; 500 responses for 

telephone interviews). 

Estimated average burden hours per 

response: 1⁄3 hour for mail survey 

respondents, 1⁄12 for follow-up 

telephone interview respondents. 

Frequency of Response: 1 time per 

respondent. 

Estimated annual reporting burden: 

709 hours. 

Total Non-hour Cost Burden: 0. 

Dated: January 10, 2007. 

Leonard Stowe, 

NPS Information Collection Clearance 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07–205 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–M 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–706 (Second 

Review)] 

In the Matter of Canned Pineapple Fruit 

from Thailand; Notice of Commission 

Determination To Conduct a Portion of 

the Hearing In Camera 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Closure of a portion of a 

Commission hearing. 

SUMMARY: Upon the timely, joint request 

of respondents, the Commission has 

determined to conduct a portion of its 

hearing in the above-captioned 

investigation scheduled for January 18, 

2007, in camera. See Commission rules 

207.24(d), 201.13(m) and 201.36(b)(4) 

(19 CFR 207.24(d), 201.13(m) and 

201.36(b)(4)). The remainder of the 

hearing will be open to the public. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gracemary R. Roth-Roffy, Esq., Office of 

the General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–

3106. Hearing-impaired individuals are 

advised that information on this matter 

may be obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission believes that Thai 

Pineapple Canning Industry Corp.; 

Malee Sampran Public Co., Ltd.; The 

Siam Agro Industry Pineapples and 

Others Public Co., Ltd.; Pranburi Hotei 

Co., Ltd.; Siam Fruit Canning (1988) Co., 

Ltd.; and Great Oriental Food Products 

and Other Fruits, Co. Ltd. (‘‘Thai 

Respondents’’) have justified the need 

for a closed session. Thai Respondents 

seek a closed session to allow for a 

discussion of business proprietary 

information (‘‘BPI’’) regarding the sole 

domestic producer’s financial and 

production operations as well as data 

relating to subject imports from 

Thailand. In making this decision, the 

Commission nevertheless reaffirms its 

belief that whenever possible its 

business should be conducted in public. 

The hearing will include the usual 

public presentations by petitioner and 

by respondents, with questions from the 

Commission. In addition, the hearing 

will include a 10-minute in camera 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
2554 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s web site. 

2Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner 

Deanna Tanner Okun concluded that the domestic 

group response for this review was adequate and 

the respondent group response was inadequate, but 

that circumstances warranted a full review. 

3The Commission has found the responses 

submitted by the domestic interested party Mittal 

Steel USA, Inc., to be individually adequate. 

Comments from other interested parties will not be 

accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). 

session for a confidential presentation 

by Thai Respondents. Each session will 

be followed by an in camera rebuttal 

presentation by petitioner and questions 

from the Commission relating to the 

BPI. During the in camera session the 

room will be cleared of all persons 

except those who have been granted 

access to BPI under a Commission 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and are included on the Commission’s 

APO service list in this investigation. 

See 19 CFR 201.35(b). The time for the 

parties’ presentations and rebuttals in 

the in camera session will be taken from 

their respective overall allotments for 

the hearing. All persons planning to 

attend the in camera portions of the 

hearing should be prepared to present 

proper identification. 

Authority: The General Counsel has 

certified, pursuant to Commission Rule 

201.39 (19 CFR 201.39) that, in his opinion, 

a portion of the Commission’s hearing in 

Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand, Inv. 

Nos. 731–TA–706 (Second Review), may be 

closed to the public to prevent the disclosure 

of BPI. 

Issued: January 16, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–718 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 731–TA–739 (Second Review)] 

Clad Steel Plate From Japan 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping 

duty order on clad steel plate from 

Japan. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of an expedited 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on clad steel plate from 

Japan would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. For further information 

concerning the conduct of this review 

and rules of general application, consult 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric 

Land (202–205–3349), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background. On January 5, 2007, the 

Commission determined that the 

domestic group response to its notice of 

institution (71 FR 57996, October 2, 

2006) of the subject five-year review was 

adequate and that the respondent 

interested party group response was 

inadequate. The Commission did not 

find any other circumstances that would 

warrant conducting a full review.1

Accordingly, the Commission 

determined that it would conduct an 

expedited review pursuant to section 

751(c)(3) of the Act.2

Staff report. A staff report containing 

information concerning the subject 

matter of the review will be placed in 

the nonpublic record on February 1, 

2007, and made available to persons on 

the Administrative Protective Order 

service list for this review. A public 

version will be issued thereafter, 

pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions. As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the review and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,3 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

review may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the review. 

Comments are due on or before 

February 6, 2007, and may not contain 

new factual information. Any person 

that is neither a party to the five-year 

review nor an interested party may 

submit a brief written statement (which 

shall not contain any new factual 

information) pertinent to the review by 

February 6, 2007. However, should the 

Department of Commerce extend the 

time limit for its completion of the final 

results of its review, the deadline for 

comments (which may not contain new 

factual information) on Commerce’s 

final results is three business days after 

the issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s rules do not 

authorize filing of submissions with the 

Secretary by facsimile or electronic 

means, except to the extent permitted by 

section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, 

as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 

2002). Even where electronic filing of a 

document is permitted, certain 

documents must also be filed in paper 

form, as specified in II (C) of the 

Commission’s Handbook on Electronic 

Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 

(November 8, 2002). 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the review must be 

served on all other parties to the review 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 

Issued: January 12, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–669 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–590] 

In the Matter of Certain Coupler 

Devices For Power Supply Facilities, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing Same; Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES