alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from SEC Form 10-Q for 
the periods ended July 5, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference 
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-28-1997             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         APR-05-1998             JUL-05-1998
<CASH>                                    60,254                  21,147
<SECURITIES>                              51,692                  66,268
<RECEIVABLES>                            325,927                 404,014
<ALLOWANCES>                             (41,177)                (28,097)
<INVENTORY>                              429,919                 436,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         877,723                 947,364
<PP&E>                                 1,106,863               1,134,469
<DEPRECIATION>                           520,737                 533,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,136,321               2,282,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    406,129                 432,751
<BONDS>                                  585,831                 692,284
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    0                       0
<COMMON>                                       0                   5,669
<OTHER-SE>                             1,024,005               1,038,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,136,321               2,282,235
<SALES>                                  544,656               1,097,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         544,656               1,097,974
<CGS>                                    381,314                 763,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            105,261                 206,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (8,985)                (13,084)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        13,314                  27,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           53,752                 112,637
<INCOME-TAX>                              16,449                  33,791
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       37,303                  78,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                       0
<CHANGES>                                      0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              37,303                  78,846
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.66                    1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.65                    1.38
        

</TABLE>
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9285 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3913 Leland Avenue Northwest in Comstock 

Park, Michigan, as the ‘‘Captain Miguel Justin Nava 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 9285 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN MIGUEL JUSTIN NAVA POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 3913 Leland Avenue Northwest 

4 in Comstock Park, Michigan, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Captain Miguel Justin Nava Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Miguel Justin 

10 Nava Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 49322.

#### Protest 105339-K of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

*290Opinion by

La whence, J.

The record fully supported the claim that the pencil sharpeners in question are similar to those involved in Abstract 41633, the record in which case was incorporated herein. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

KEVIN FENNICK,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action 2:11-cv-01107

v. Judge James L. Graham

Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

DAMON SAMS,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the January 5, 2012 Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to an initial screen, the Magistrate Judge

recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s action for failure to state a claim.1

 The Magistrate

Judge specifically found that Plaintiff’s Complaint failed to state a claim for either trade name

infringement or cybersquatting. 

On January 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Emergency Motion for Sixty Day

Extension and Opposition for Evaluation . . .” (ECF No. 6.) The Court interpreted this filing as a

Motion for Extension and granted the Motion in part, giving Plaintiff thirty days from January 18,

2012, to submit additional argument in objection to the Report and Recommendation. As of the

date of this Order, Plaintiff has failed to file an Objection to the Report and Recommendation.2

The Court has performed a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

1

 The Magistrate Judge considered the content of Plaintiff’s December 23, 2011 Motion

to Amend, but still found that Plaintiff failed to state a claim.

2

 Construed liberally, portions of Plaintiff’s January 13, 2012 filing to appear to contest

the Magistrate Judge’s findings, although in a conclusory fashion.

Case: 2:11-cv-01107-JLG-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Even construing Plaintiff’s January 13, 2012, filing as an Objection to the

Report and Recommendation, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff has failed

to plead sufficient factual detail to state a facially plausible claim. The Court also agrees with the

Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff’s proffered amendment, including his proposed claim against an

additional defendant, also fails to state a facially plausible claim. Accordingly, the January 5,

2012, Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) is ADOPTED, Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc.

4) is DENIED, and Plaintiff’s action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to

state a claim. To the extent Plaintiff requests a hearing or appointment of counsel, these requests

are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

S/ James L. Graham 

James L. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Date: February 27, 2012

2

Case: 2:11-cv-01107-JLG-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007283EN.01001101.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d'Appello di Milano (Italy) lodged on 22 August 2007 — Marco Gambazzi v Daimler Chrysler Canada Inc and CIBC Mellon Trust Company

(Case C-394/07)

(2007/C 283/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte d'Appello di Milano

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Marco Gambazzi

Appellant:

Respondents: Daimler Chrysler Canada Inc, CIBC Mellon Trust Company

Respondents:

Questions referred

| 1. | On the basis of the public-policy clause in Article 27(1) of the Brussels Convention, may the court of the State requested to enforce a judgment take account of the fact that the court of the State which handed down that judgment denied the unsuccessful party — which had entered an appearance — the opportunity to present any form of defence following the issue of a debarring order as described [in the grounds of the present Order]? |
| --- | --- |

1.

On the basis of the public-policy clause in Article 27(1) of the Brussels Convention, may the court of the State requested to enforce a judgment take account of the fact that the court of the State which handed down that judgment denied the unsuccessful party — which had entered an appearance — the opportunity to present any form of defence following the issue of a debarring order as described [in the grounds of the present Order]?

| 2. | Or does the interpretation of that provision in conjunction with the principles to be inferred from Article 26 et seq. of the Convention, concerning the mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments within the Community, preclude the national court from finding that civil proceedings in which a party has been prevented from exercising the rights of the defence, on grounds of a debarring order issued by the court because of that party's failure to comply with a court injunction, are contrary to public policy within the meaning of Article 27(1)? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Or does the interpretation of that provision in conjunction with the principles to be inferred from Article 26 et seq. of the Convention, concerning the mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments within the Community, preclude the national court from finding that civil proceedings in which a party has been prevented from exercising the rights of the defence, on grounds of a debarring order issued by the court because of that party's failure to comply with a court injunction, are contrary to public policy within the meaning of Article 27(1)?

et seq.

---
# C_2008216EN.01001501.xml

| 23.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/15

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 August 2008

(2008/C 216/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4808 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 162,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4599 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79660 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3777 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6228 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 120,77 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9335 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,373 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 233,68 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7033 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,2963 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5213 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,308 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7562 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7020 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5502 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5608 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0782 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0882 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 573,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3757 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1188 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1708 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 534,51 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9459 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,380 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,0899 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,281 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3893 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 14,9576 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4808

JPY

Japanese yen

162,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4599

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79660

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3777

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6228

ISK

Iceland króna

120,77

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9335

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,373

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

233,68

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7033

PLN

Polish zloty

3,2963

RON

Romanian leu

3,5213

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,308

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7562

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7020

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5502

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5608

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0782

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0882

KRW

South Korean won

1 573,28

ZAR

South African rand

11,3757

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1188

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1708

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 534,51

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9459

PHP

Philippine peso

67,380

RUB

Russian rouble

36,0899

THB

Thai baht

50,281

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3893

MXN

Mexican peso

14,9576

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JAMES EDWARD GRIMES, Gunner’s Mate (Guns) Second Class, U. S. Navy, Appellant

19 USCMA 351, 41 CMR 351

No. 22,621

March 27, 1970

*Lieutenant Allen D. Black,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Charles J. Keener,*USMC, and *Lieutenant Colonel Lawrence G. Bohlen,*USMC, were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The appellant has been convicted of several charges and numerous specifications, including eight that allege the violation of paragraph 38a, Headquarters, United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, Directive 37-6, prohibiting the unauthorized purchase of postal money orders in excess of $200.00 per month. We granted the appellant’s petition to determine whether the directive punitively applies to the appellant’s purchase of postal money orders as alleged in specifications 4 through 11 of Charge II.

The character of this general order was recently considered in United States v Benway, 19 USCMA 345, 41 CMR 345 (1970). The Court there determined that its violation was punishable by court-martial. For the reasons expressed in *Benway,*the directive will likewise support the findings in this case.

The decision of the board of review is, therefore, affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Ferguson concur.
1 TheHonorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-2530

___________ Ivonnia Davis, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States State of Missouri; Missouri Division of * District Court for the Family Services; Missouri Family * Eastern District of Missouri. Court/Juvenile Division; Missouri * Department of Education, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 30, 1999 Filed: October 20, 1999

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ivonnia Davis appeals from the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissalof her 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record and Ms. Davis’s brief, we conclude the district court correctly dismissed the-2-

complaint because the State of Missouri and its agencies are not “persons” under sections 1983 and 1985(3). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 47494.

#### Protests 34416-K, etc., of Goldfarb Novelty Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the celluloid figures in question are similar to those involved in *Pressner*v. *United States*(C. D. 546) the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was sustained.
---

---

EXHIBIT 12.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO

EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Yair Averbuch, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Caesarstone
Sdot-Yam Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Yair Averbuch

Yair Averbuch

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: March 22, 2013

---

---
(Reap. Dec. 8770)

#### J. J. Boll *v.*United States

Entry No. 978465.

*615(Decided March 21, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The record indicates that at the call of the calendar there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 59150.

protests 239601-K and 239598-K (Bridgeport).

#### E. Wagman & Co., Limited *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste sheepskin scrap similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fairfield Wool Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1653), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0480

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID JOEL EATON, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 15, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 9 2022

05/09/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0480
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# ADA, keep the promise, America wins!

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  ADA, keep the promise, America wins! 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Bush, George, 1924- 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  141 × 57 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  024606600.jpg; 024606600.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 41933.

#### Protest 469568-G of Salem Shawiry (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of embroidered laces. On the authority of *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551) the claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was sustained.
No. 76-5152.

#### Stockheimer *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. *Molinaro*v. *New Jersey,*396 U. S. 365 (1970).