alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
California Regional Water Quality Control Board

Los Angeles Region

Over 51 Years Serving Coastal Los Angeles and Ventura Counties

Recipient of the 2001 Environmental Leadership Award from Keep California Beautiful

320 W. 4th Street, Suite 200, Los Angeles, California 90013

Phone (213) 576-6600 FAX (213) 576-6640 - Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb4

California Environmental Protection Agency

 Recycled Paper

Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California’s water resources for the benefit of present and future generations.

Terry Tamminen

Secretary for

Environmental

Protection

Arnold Schwarzenegger

Governor

November 19, 2004

Mr. Robert Gallagher, Director

Environmental Health Division

County of Ventura

800 South Victoria Avenue

Ventura, CA 93009

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

APPROVAL OF MONITORING PLAN UNDER GENERAL NATIONAL POLLUTANT

DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT AND WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS

– VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION VECTOR CONTROL

PROGRAM, WATERSHEDS IN VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (NPDES NO.

CAG990004, CI-8788)

We have received and reviewed the Statement of Best Management Practices and Monitoring

Plan for Application of Aquatic Pesticides (Monitoring Plan) that you submitted to comply with

Order No. 2004-0008-DWQ, Statewide General National Pollutant Discharge Elimination

System Permit For Discharges of Aquatic Pesticides to Surface Waters of the United States for

Vector Control, adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) on May 20,

2004. 

The Monitoring Plan is hereby approved for implementation. We anticipate that, as experience

with implementation of this Monitoring Plan grows, it may become necessary to modify the

Monitoring Plan to make it more effective and efficient.

Please be aware that you are required to submit each calendar year an Annual Report to the

Regional Board by January 31 of the following year, as specified in section C. of Attachment B

of the subject NPDES permit. The first Annual Report is due by January 31, 2005. When

submitting the annual report to the Regional Board per the requirements of this permit, please

include a reference to “Compliance File No. CI-8788 and NPDES No. CAG990004”, which will

assure that the reports are directed to the appropriate file and staff. Also, please submit each

type of report as a separate document. 

If you cease the application of pesticides and the permit is no longer needed, please submit

written notification to the Regional Board so that you will not be billed for future annual fees.
Mr. Robert Gallagher - 2 - November 19, 2004

County of Ventura

California Environmental Protection Agency

 Recycled Paper

Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California’s water resources for the benefit of present and future generations.

If you have any questions, please contact Gensen Kai at (213) 576-6651.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Bishop

Executive Officer

cc: Wayne Sobieralski, Regulation Unit, State Water Resources Control Board

Susan Johnson, County of Ventura Agricultural Commissioner’s Office
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Slaughter swine, official US grades

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Slaughter swine, official US grades 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Slaughter swine, official US grades 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Livestock and Seed Division 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  197 × 54 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  020701576.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION OF 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Allen, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                     
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: January 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Kenneth R. Allen                                
|                       |  | Kenneth R. Allen                                    
|                       |  | Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Texas Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Texas Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I
. J 

### •' ^ >l : 

### 1 ? Moiirltai n Vilidgf l C O SM? ^ rtwwlownnfmaiiiiairt'iliag e corn 97 0 ?2 8 SOfJ

O 97 0 ^2 8 431 2 Augus t 23 , 201 0 Departmen t o fTransportatio n I n th e Matte ro fGran t Application s Smal l Communil vAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Unde r4 9 U.S. C 4174 3 e t seq . Docke t DOT-OST-2010-012 4 Th e Tow n o fMountai n Villag e support s th e Tellurid e Regiona l Airpor t Authority' s reques t fo ra Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m gran t fro m th e Departmen t o fTransportation
. Ou rcommunit yi s ver yconcerne d abou t th e reductio n o fai rservic e t o th e Tellurid e Airpor t i n recen t years . Thi s reductio n ha s resulte d i n increase d fare s an d ha s cause d loca l resident s an d visitor s t o driv e a grea t distanc e t o trave l fro m othe rairports
. Thi s additiona l fundin g wil l giv e th e Tellurid e regio n a competitiv e opportunit yt o increas e ai rservice , reduc e airfare s an d recove rsom e o fth e los t ai rsea t capacit ytha t ha s occurre d i n recen t years . Whil e ou rregio n ha s a n econom yhighl ydependen t o n touris m an d ai rservic e access , sustainin g an d grovvin g ou rpresen t ai racces s i s critica l t o th e developmen t o fothe rloca l industrie s an d t o suppor t ou r school s an d medica l needs
. Th e Tellurid e Regiona l Atrpor t i s th e highes t altitud e commercia l airpor t i n th e Unite d States
. Thi s present s a challeng e t o attractin g ne wai rservic e an d require s a highe rleve l o ffunding
. Start-u p fundin g suppor t b yth e Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Gran t progra m i s critica l t o ou rgoa l o fincreasin g ai rservic e access . Than k yo u fo ryou rconsideratio n o fth e Tellurid e Regiona l Airpor t Authorit ySmal l Communit yAi r Servic e Developmen t Progra m Gran t request .

Rober t Delves , Mayo r Tow n o fMountai n Villag e
# C_2007247EN.01002001.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/20

---

Action brought on 7 September 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-412/07)

(2007/C 247/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Vidal Puig, Agent, M. Petite, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/36/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on the safety of third-country aircraft using Community airports, or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/36/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on the safety of third-country aircraft using Community airports, or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

| — | order Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directives had to be transposed expired on 30 April 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 143, p. 76.

1

---
July 29, 1940

No. 44160.

Suit *4283.*

#### *Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.*v. *United States*

modified. C. A. D. 121.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7895

JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SCDC; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-03-2463-7-20AJ)

Submitted: July 16, 2004 Decided: September 23, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*By order entered April 5, 2004, this appeal was placed in

abeyance for Jones v. Braxton, No. 03-6891. In view of our recent

decision in Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363 (4th Cir. 2004), we no

longer find it necessary to hold this case in abeyance for Jones.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Julian Edward Rochester, a state prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).* An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his

constitutional claims are debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Rochester has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
- 3 -

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Thomas
& Betts Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of August, 2002.

                                 /s/ T. Kevin Dunnigan
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 T. Kevin Dunnigan
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Insert your local railroad emergency phone number 

Train Crew Information

c Name/Title

c Address

c DOB

c Telephone

c Locomotive engineer certificate information

(State driver license not required to be in possession 

of engineer or recorded on accident report).

Train Information

c Lead locomotive number

c Train ID or symbol assigned by the railroad

c Number of cars in the train

c Initial and number of railroad car stopped on crossing

c Owner of tracks (name & address)

c Railroad company operating train (name & address)

c Train stopping distance from point of impact

Ask Crew Member to Operate Locomotive Safety 

Devices:

c Headlight and auxiliary lights

c Horn (CAUTION - Horn is Loud)

c Locomotive Bell

Grade Cros

Investigat

when the above information is collected 

consider releasing the train

for inidents a

involving railroad t

Crossing Information

c	 c	 Crossbuck Sign

c	 c	 Multiple Track Sign

c	 c	 Advance Warning Sign

c	 c	 Pavement Markings

c	 c	 Active Warning Devices functioning

c	 DOT crossing inventory number

c	 Distance from Advance Warning Sign to nearest rail

c	 Crossing surface (rubber, asphalt, concrete, wood, etc.)

c	 Visual obstructions on driver approach to crossin

Yes
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 19, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 19, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A0241. ALSF CAPITAL, LLC v. DAVENPORT CAPITAL, LLC.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |   | August 3, 2010 |   | /s/   Thomas Paulson             |
|--------|--------|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |           |   | Thomas Paulson                                  |
|   |   |           |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,

# FIRSTCIRCUIT

TODDW. FANGUYAND CHRISTY A. FANGUY VERSUS 

### UV INSURANCE RISKRETENTION GROUP, INC. 

### AND DOUGLAS R. FORTUNE NO. 

### 2021 CW 1294



### FEBRUARY 18, 2022

In Re: UV 

### Logistics, LLC, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs,



### 32nd Judicial District 

### Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 

### 187229.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. Plaintiffs, Todd W. 

### Fanguy and 

## Christy A. 

## Fanguy, have not alleged vicarious 

## liability or respondeat superior 

### in this matter. Defendant, UV 

### Logistic, LLC's, gratuitous 

### stipulation did not defeat plaintiffs' allegations of 

### independent negligence. N-Di:i

Theriot, J., concurs. McClendon, J., 

### dissents and would grant the writ application. A plaintiff cannot maintain 

### direct negligence claims such as negligent 

## hiring, entrustment, supervision, etc. against an employer while 

### simultaneously 

### maintaining claims against the employer 

### for vicarious 

## liability after the employer has admitted that the employee was 

### in the course and scope of employment at the time of the alleged conduct. Wheeler V. United 

### States Fire Insurance 

## Company, 2018-1422 ( La. 

## App. 1st Cir. 

### 6/13/19), 2019 WL 

### 2612903, * 2 ( unpublished) ( per curiam); Elee v. 

### White, 2019-1633 ( La. 

### App. 1st Cir. 

### 7/24/20), So.3d

2020 WL 4251974, * 4, writ 

### denied, 

### 2020-01048 ( La. 

### 11/10/20), 

### 303 So.3d 1038. In this case the plaintiffs, Todd W. 

## Fanguy and 

## ChristyA. Fanguy, alleged that 

### Douglas Fortune was under the control 

### and direction of UV Logistics, LLC, and that UV Logistics, LLC was responsible 

### for the actions of Douglas Fortune under Louisiana 

### law. Defendant, UV Logistics, LLC, admitted that 

### defendant, Douglas Fortune, was 

### in the course and scope of employment at the time of the accident. 

## Accordingly, I would reverse the trial court' s 

### judgment, grant the motion 

### for summary 

### judgment filed 

## by defendant, UV Logistics, LLC, and 

### dismiss all claims of 

### independent negligence against UV Logistics, LLC for negligent 

## hiring, training, supervision and retention. COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY NLERKOFCOURT FORTHE COURT
Kankakee River Bridge and Track Improvements Project

Map
(Reap. Dec. 9332)

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 863937-1/3; 877076-1/2.

(Decided February 27, 1959)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals enumerated in the attached schedule A are for reappraisement of the values of various kinds of merchandise imported fromrJapan.

The appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation of counsel limiting them to the merchandise shipped by Nanri Trading Co., Ltd., and abandoning the same as to all other merchandise. The said stipulation also recites certain facts, on the basis of which I find, as to the merchandise shipped by Nanri Trading Co. Ltd., that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for determining the value of the said merchandise, and that such value, as to each item, was the net invoice price, packing included. In all other respects and as to all other merchandise, the appeals for reappraisement, having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of EverBank Financial Corp (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2016 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Clements, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ Robert M. ClementsRobert M. ClementsChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)EverBank Financial CorpApril 13, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2099

JOSH BILLINGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-97-4)

Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Josh Billings, Appellant Pro Se. James Walter Hopper, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Josh Billings appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his action challenging Virginia’s election laws. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Billings’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Billings v. Virginia, No. CA-98-97-4 (E.D. Va. July 9,

1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED