alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

Board of Directors 

Texas Industries, Inc.

 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective AmendmentNumber 9 to Registration Statement Number 2-48986 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-53715 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-11604 on Form S-8 (as amended), Registration Statement Number 333-106610 on Form S-4 (as amended),and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated September 23, 2004 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Texas Industries, Inc. which are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2004.

 

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not partof the Registration Statement prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. 

 

 

October 8, 2004 

Dallas, Texas 

 

- 30 -
No. 59152.

protest 254329-K (New York).

#### Sam Forwand Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste sheepskin scrap similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fairfield Wool Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1653), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 15.2

April 24, 2013

iSoftStone Holdings Limited (the Company)

International Software Plaza, Building 9 Zhongguancun Software Park

No. 8 West Dongbeiwang Road, Haidian District

Beijing 100193, China

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as legal
advisors as to the laws of the Peoples Republic of China to the Company in connection with the filing by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of an annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012 (the Annual Report).

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and our opinions and views in
the Annual Report. We further consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report.

In giving such consent, we do not
thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the regulations promulgated thereunder.

Sincerely yours,



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Han Kun Law Offices
|Han Kun Law Offices
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.F. Hughes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.


The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.


/s/ J.F. Hughes
-----------------------
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
October 1, 2003
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**906 Certification**

 

April 30, 2012

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

James Jinshan Hong, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chi Hon Tsang, the Chief Financial Officer of Zuoan Fashion Limited, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.              the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.              the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Himax Technologies, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ James Jinshan   Hong |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Name:                    | James Jinshan Hong |
|   | Title:                   | Chairman and Chief   Executive Officer |

 

 
|   | /s/   Chi Hon Tsang |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | Name:               | Chi Hon Tsang |
|   | Title:              | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
# C_2008080EN.01000702.xml

| 1.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5029 — Sonepar/Rexel Germany)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 80/04)

On 8 February 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5029. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5029. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
(Reap. Dec. 8364)

#### H. Reifenberg *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 820568; 828885.

(Decided December 1, 1954)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by and between the respective parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise invoiced as “Ribbon Isinglass”, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, at $.6525 per pound, packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value, as defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the merchandise involved herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to he the proper basis for the determination of the value of the ribbon isinglass here involved, and that such value was $0.6525 per pound, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2007269EN.01004102.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/41

---

Plenary session

(2007/C 269/72)

On 2 October 2007, the Court of First Instance decided, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 32(1) of the Rules of Procedure, that where, following the designation of an Advocate General pursuant to Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure, there is an even number of Judges in the Court of First Instance sitting in plenary session, the rota established in advance, applied during the period of three years for which the Presidents of the Chambers composed of five Judges are elected, in accordance with which the President of the Court is to designate the Judge who will not take part in the judgment of the case, shall be in reverse order to the order in which the Judges rank according to their seniority in office under Article 6 of the Rules of Procedure, unless the Judge who would thus be designated is the Judge-Rapporteur. In that event, it is the Judge ranking immediately above him who shall be designated.

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v DEL R. POWELL, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

No. 29,516

September 19, 1975

*Colonel Victor A. DeFiori, Captain Pete M. Dalmut, and Captain Anthony J. Siano*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Donald W. Hansen*was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

Prior to sentencing, the prosecution offered two official record entries to establish a previous summary court-martial conviction of the appellant for larceny. The DA Form 20B1 and DD Form 4932 were both admitted into evidence without objection.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that the DD Form 493 extract will be prepared from the information provided on the DA Form 20B.3 Thus, the admissibility of the DD Form 493 must turn upon the admissibility of the DA Form 20B.

Because the DA Form 20B affirmatively established that the required supervisory review had not been accomplished, the prior summary court-martial conviction was not final and should not have been considered by the tried judge in sentencing the appellant. *United States v Heflin,*23 USCMA 505, 50 CMR 644 (1975). Although the DD Form 493 extract indicates on its. face that the prior conviction was final,4 the presumption of regularity surrounding this entry was rebutted by the notation to the contrary on the DA Form 20B, the original source of information for the extract. Therefore, the trial judge erred in considering the DD Form 493 extract as *554evidence that the prior summary court-martial was final.

The decision of the US Army Court of Military Review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for resubmission to the Court of Military Review. In its discretion, the court may cure the error by reassessment of the sentence, or it may return the case to the trial forum for a rehearing as to the sentence.

1

 Department of the Army Form 20B (Insert Sheet to DA Form 20), Record of Court-Martial Conviction.

2

 Department of Defense Form 493, Extract of Military Records of Previous Convictions.

3

 Paragraph 2-31, Army Regulation 27-10 (Dec. 12, 1973).

4

 The date of supervisory or appellate review is entered in the block labeled, "Date Sentence Finally Approved,” on thp Form 493. Thus, a date entry in this block would indicate that the conviction was, in fact, final. *See*paragraph 2-31, AR 27-10 (Dec. 12,1973).
A90A0443.

#### SAARI v. GILLETT COMMUNICATIONS OF ATLANTA, INC.

(393 SE2d 736)

Banke, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, acting as administrator of the estate of Bradley Gerard Saari, sued the appellee for defamation, alleging that after the decedent had been found burned to death in his automobile the appellee broadcast a news report falsely describing his death as being “drug-related.” This appeal is from the grant of the appellee broadcaster’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. *Held:*

There is no common law right of action for defamation of a deceased person. See Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 560 (1977); 2 Harper, James & Gray, The Law of Torts, § 5.3 (1986); 50 AmJur2d, Libel & Slander, § 320 (1970). Since there is no Georgia statute alter*452ing the common law in this regard, the trial court did not err in granting the appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Accord *Atlanta Journal Co. v. Farmer,*48 Ga. App. 273 (172 SE 647) (1933) (holding that the alleged defamation of a deceased person creates no cause of action in favor of his relatives). The appellant’s reliance on *Johnson v. Bradstreet Co.,*87 Ga. 79 (13 SE 250) (1891), is misplaced, as that case merely held that where a living person had brought an action for libel and then died while the action was pending, the action did not abate but survived to his representative. It clearly does not follow from this holding that a person can be libeled after he has died.

Decided April 27, 1990.

*Rolader & Rolader, D. W. Rolader,*for appellant.

*Alston & Bird, Judson Graves, Bryan A. Vroon,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur. Cooper, J., disqualified.*
No. 45106.

#### Protest 29227-K of S. Lisk & Bro. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The protest was submitted without the introduction oi evidence in support of the claim made. There being nothing in the record to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action the protest was overruled.
# C_2008147EN.01000101.xml

| 13.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.4989 — Ålö/MX)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 147/01)

On 9 June 2008, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4989 — Ålö/MX, to the following address:

| Commission of the European Communities |
| --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70 |
| B-1000 Brussels |

Commission of the European Communities

Competition DG

Merger Registry

Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70

B-1000 Brussels

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9280 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9280

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to include the program of 
advanced training in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps in the 
    computation of the length of service in the Armed Forces of an 
   individual appointed as an officer on the basis of satisfactorily 
              completing the requirements of such program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2024

     Mr. Pappas (for himself, Mr. Moylan, and Mr. Golden of Maine) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to include the program of 
advanced training in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps in the 
    computation of the length of service in the Armed Forces of an 
   individual appointed as an officer on the basis of satisfactorily 
              completing the requirements of such program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save the Green to Gold Program 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF SERVICE IN SROTC IN THE COMPUTATION OF LENGTH OF 
              SERVICE AN OFFICER APPOINTED FOR COMPLETING SROTC.

    Subsection (c) of section 2106 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``August 1, 1979, as a member of the 
        Selected Reserve.'' and inserting an em dash; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
            ``(1) August 1, 1979, as a member of the Selected Reserve; 
        or
            ``(2) the date of the enactment of the Save the Green to 
        Gold Program Act, regardless of the component in which the 
        officer performed such enlisted service.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

I, Daniel J. Gardetto, certify that:



|(a) | A review of the Servicers activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2011 to
December 31, 2011 has been made under my supervision.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects
throughout the aforementioned period.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated March 19, 2012



/s/ Daniel J. GardettoDaniel J. GardettoAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2010-B
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9343 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9343

   To prohibit any electric vehicle mandate, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 9, 2024

  Ms. Tenney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit any electric vehicle mandate, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Electric Vehicle Mandate 
Prohibition Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:
            (1) Consumer choice in the automotive market is paramount.
            (2) Federal mandates on electric vehicles (EV) impose undue 
        burdens on consumers and manufacturers.
            (3) Such mandates disrupt market dynamics and inhibit 
        technological innovation.
            (4) Federal EV mandates undermine free market principles 
        and impose unnecessary costs on American consumers and 
        businesses.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON RESTRICTING SALE OF VEHICLES BASED ON MODE OF 
              PROPULSION.

    (a) Prohibition.--The Federal Government, a State, and local 
government may not prohibit the sale of gas and hybrid powered vehicles 
sold based on the mode of propulsion, including through the following:
            (1) Any regulation or enforcement of a regulation that 
        requires the production, sale, or purchase of electric 
        vehicles.
            (2) A mandate that requires a specific percentage of 
        vehicles produced or sold to be electric vehicles, including 
        any school bus or other vehicle use by a public safety 
        official.
            (3) A financial penalty for failing to meet electric 
        vehicle production or sales targets.
    (b) Penalty.--With respect to a State (or local government in a 
State) that takes an action prohibited by subsection (a) during a 
fiscal year, the Secretary of Transportation shall withhold 10 percent 
of the amount required to be apportioned to such State under section 
104(b) of title 23, United States Code, for the following fiscal year.
    (c) GAO Review.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this section, and annually thereafter, the Comptroller 
General shall submit to Congress a report on Federal Government 
activity to ensure compliance with this section.
    (d) State Defined.--In this section, the term ``State'' means each 
of the several States, the District of Columbia, each commonwealth, 
territory, or possession of the United States, and each federally 
recognized Indian Tribe.
                                 <all>
```
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# United States Army - World War II

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  United States Army - World War II 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Forces Command. Directorate of Public Affairs 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Forces Command. Directorate of Public Affairs 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Army 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  FORSCOM poster ; 117 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  index.cpd 

Part of: United States Army - World War II (2 objects)     Next

United States Army - World War II

United States Army - World War II

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -