alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-383-080]


Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Tariff Filing

April 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, Dominion Transmission, Inc. 
(DTI) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised 
Volume No. 1, Eighth Revised Sheet No. 1405, to become effective April 
1, 2007.
    DTI states that the purpose of this filing is to report a name and 
contract number change to a previously negotiated rate agreement.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#21676473626e4f4d484f44725451514e535561474453420f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="72343720313d1c1e1b1c17210702021d000632141700115c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6807 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Hon. Paul H. Brown Opinion No. v-a.24 

Fire Insurance Commissioner 

Land Office Building Be: 

Austin, Texas 

Recessitg of refunding 

fees paid for renewal 

0r agency licenses upon 

refusal to renew the 

licenses. 

Dear Col. Brown: 

You have asked for the opinion of this office on 

the following: 

"This Department, under 5062b, Section 10, 

is engaged in issuing renewal licenses to lnsurante agencies throughout Texas. These egents 

send thel~ renewal'eppilcati-ons ~lnto- this Depa~rtment;generally accompanied by the fee of $1.00. 

In some instances we refuse to issue the renewal 

license. The 

to refund the 8 

uestion occurs: Are we required 

1.00 sent in?" 

Sections 8 and 10 of Article 5062b, Vernon's Civil 

Statutes, provide as follows: 

"Sec. a. Every license issued to a local 

Recording Agent or Solicitor shall expire on the 

first day of March each year, unless an application to qualify for the renewal of any such license 

shall be filed with the Board of Insurance Co&ssioners and fee paid on or before such date, in 

which event the license sought to be renewed shall 

continue in full force and effect until renewed or 

renewal Is refused. 

~.'~ "S 86.. 10. An appllc,antfor the renewal of a 

Local Recording Agent's license or for the renewal 

of a Sollcltor*s license shall pay, at the time the 

renewal application is filed, a fee of one ($1.00) 

Dollar." 

The question asked can be answered only by arrivingat the' int,ention of ttre Legislature as manifested 

in Sect1ons.S ?$nd lO~.of Article 5062b. It is our opinion 

,,.~ .,, 
Hon. Paul H. Brown, page 2 (v-824) 

that the Legislature Intended for the one dollar fee provided for in the Article to be primarily a filing fee coverfng the charge for the filing of any renewel application 

for a Local Recording Agent’s ,license or a Solicitor’s llcerise. We are further of ths opinion that It 1s not necessary to refund the one dollar fee paid by an applicant whose 

lioenee is not renewed. 

‘It is riot necessary to refund the one($l.OO) 

dollar fee~~paid under the provisions of Section 

10 of Artiole 5062b by a person applying fPf the 

renewal of a Local Recording Agent’s or a Solicltar’s license whose lioense is not renewed by 

the Board of Insurance Commissioners. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNKI GERERAL OF TKKAS 

By %:ti 

Assista& 

APPROVED : 

rfFn-aw 

FIRST ASSISTANT 

ATTORNEY dEBfERAL 

CBK/rt: jrb
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Invest in your future with US savings bonds

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Invest in your future with US savings bonds 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Postal Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  171 × 54 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018214787.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Maxsur LLC

. – ADDENDUM TO ADD ALL APPROVED UAS

- 1 of 1

M arch 15, 2016 U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20 590 Submitted Electronically via the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS)

Dear Sir or Madam : On behalf of Jake Lehman , Chief Operating Officer of MAXSUR LLC dba UAV Direct (Applicant). I, Eric Andelin, President of Vertical Information Services, Inc ., (VERTX) and consultant to the applicant have prepared the following addendum to Exemption No. 13696 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3875

. This addendum adds any aircraft identified on the List of Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) under Section 333 a t regulatory docket FAA

– 2007

– 3330 at www.regulations.gov , (which is updated regularly) when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Allowing the us e of any aircraft on the List of Approved Unmanned Systems (UAS) has been approved recently in exemptions:

 Exemption No. 15233 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 5418

 Exemption No. 15234 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 5360

 Exemption No. 15235 Regulatory Docke t No. FAA

– 2015

– 5272

 Exemption No. 15236 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 5253

 Exemption No. 15237 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 5236 The exemptions referenced above are identical in nature to VERTX’s prior approved client exemptions, including MAXSUR LLC dba UAV Direct ’s exemption and therefore no new precedent would be set by extending the same List to MAXSUR LLC dba UAV Direct

. This a ddendum makes no other changes to the currently approved Exemption No. 13696

. Please direct any ques tion or comment regar ding this addendum to myself the Consultant for the Applicant. Consultant for Applicant Applicant Mr. Eric Andelin Jake Lehman President Vertical Information Services, Inc. MAXSUR LLC dba UAV Direct

. 301 W Platt St #654 14365 W State Hwy 29 Tampa, FL 33606 Liberty Hill , TX 78642 Phone: 813.992.6612 Email: eric@vertisx.com
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ho Kang-Wing, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransAKT Ltd. for
      the period ended March 31, 2015 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of TransAKT Ltd.                                                                 

|Dated: May 20, 2015 | /s/ Ho
      Kang-Wing                                         
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | HO Kang-Wing                                                   
|                    | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President
      and Director
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer)                                  
|                    | TransAKT Ltd.                                                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TransAKT Ltd.
and will be retained by TransAKT Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Before the Third Division,

May 12, 1949

No. 53151.

#### Barasch Handkerchief Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60175-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Etcwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10- K /A of NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Frank V. Saracino, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:/s/ FRANK V. SARACINOFrank V. SaracinoChief Financial Officer and TreasurerDate:September 16, 2019





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
North Rail Connector Project

Environmental Assessment

57 | Page

Appendix F – FEMA FIRM Map
Legend 

SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAPFOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUTur 

SPECIAL FLOOD 

HAZARDAREAS 

AREAS OF 

FLOOD HAZARD 

AREAS 

GENE RA L 

STRUCTURES 

OTHER 

FEATURES 

MAP PANELS 

WITTHOUTBASE Flood E levat ion (BFE) 

Wit h BFE or Dept h zoneAE, AO, 

Regulatory Floodway 

0TH ER 

0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas 

of 1% annual ance flood with 8\'&rag& 

depth less than one foot or with drai nage 

areas of less than one sq uare mi le zonex 

Futu re Conditions 1% AnnualI 

Cha nce Flood Hazard zonex 

Area with Reduced Flood Risk du.e to 

levee S,e,e Notes zonex 

Area with Flood Risk due to L&v&& zoneD 

Area of Minimal Flood Hazsrd zon

Effective LOM Rs 

Area of LI ndete rmi ned Flood Hazard

Cha nnel, Culvert, or Storm S1m&r 

I I I I I I I levee Dike or Floodwall 

Cross Section ns with 1% Annual Chance 

----112 Water Surface Elevation 

0-- - - Coastal Transect 

-,-.~,--~ Base Flood Elevation Li ne (BFE) 

Limit of Study 

--- Jurisdiction Boundary 

- - Coastal Transect Base line 

Profile Baseline 

Hydrograph ic Featu re 

Digital Data Ava ila bl& 

ex 

zoneD 

No Digital Data Available 

Unmapped 

The pin diisp layed on the map is an approximate 

point selectedby the user and does not represent 

an Authoritiative property location ion. 

This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of 

digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. 

The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap 

accuracystandards 

The flood hazard information is derived direclty from the 

authoritative NFHL web services providedby FEMA. Th is map 

was exported on 3/ 15/2019 at 12" :12 :34 PM and does not 

reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this data and 

time. The NFHL and effective infor mat ion may or 

becomesuperseded by new data ov,er time 

This map i mage is void if the one or more of the following map 

elements do not appear basemap imagery flood zone labels 

legend, scalebar, map creation date, community identifiers \ 

FIRM panel number and FIRM effectivedate Map i images for 

ummappedand unmodern ized areas cannot be used for 

regulatory p urposes. 

National Flood Hazard Layer Fl RMette FEMA 

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 

Q 

i
(Reap. Dec. 8214)

#### Amicale Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 30122/1/2.

(Decided April 21, 1953)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement-has been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for tbe parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> That the instant appeal to reappraisement covers 100% wool yarn exported from Germany.

> That on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the market of Germany in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the *545United States, including cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States at the following prices:

> Invoice No. 1 — $6.1728 per kilogram, plus 0.927643% net, packed.

> Invoice No. 2 — $4.6296 per kilogram, plus 0.62893% net, packed.

> That on or about the date of exportation the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption in Germany was not higher.

> That the instant appeal to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and. that such values were as follows:

> Invoice No. 1 — $6.1728 per kilogram, plus 0.927643% net, packed.

> Invoice No. 2- — $4.6296 per kilogram, plus 0.62893% net, packed..

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 640-USPS, the US Postal Service information hotline

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 640-USPS, the US Postal Service information hotline 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Postal Service 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  192 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019883143.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 51153.

#### Protests 15786-K, etc., of George E. Mallinson Importing Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
  1.
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NeuStar, Inc. for the quarter ended March
31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    Information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NeuStar,
Inc.
 May 15, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey E. GanekJeffrey E. GanekChief Executive OfficerMay 15, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey A. BabkaJeffrey A. BabkaChief Financial Officer
No. 58170.

protest 223920-K (New York).

#### American Thermo-Ware Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).