alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

 

I, James Darrell Thomas, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2010-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.               I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and, based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

 

5.               All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.

 
|                  | HARLEY-DAVIDSON   MOTORCYCLE TRUST 2010-1 |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                  |
|                  | By:                                       | Harley-Davidson   Credit Corp.,   as Servicer |
|                  |                                      |   |
|                  | By:                                       | /s/   James Darrell Thomas |
|                  |                                      | James   Darrell Thomas |
|                  |                                      | Vice   President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (senior officer in charge of the   servicing function) |
|                  |                                      |   |
|                  |                                      |   |
| March 28,   2011 |                                      |   |
|                       |                                           |  |  |

 

----
No. 56115.

protest 169221-K (New York).

#### Dan Brechner & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
# C_2008237EN.01000202.xml

| 16.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5068 — L'Oréal/YSL Beauté)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 237/04)

On 17 June 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5068. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5068. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### Charles L. King *v.*United States

No. 7535.

Entry Nos. 713813; 740063.

Invoices dated Walsall, England, July 12, 1946, etc.

Certified July 16, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 16, 1946, etc.

*380(Decided February 10, 1948)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Acf of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
July 7, 1971

No. 71-27

#### James W. Gibbs, LCPL, U. S. Marine Corps v United States.

On consideration of the “Application for Writ of Prohibition” filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that said application is predicated upon the contention that court-martial jurisdiction does not exist in view of the existence of “a judicial system in the civilian community of the Ryukyu Islands which provides all of the constitutional protections and safeguards in criminal trials to which American citizens are entitled”; and it further appearing that petitioner is presently charged with wrongful possession of hypodermic syringes and needles in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC, Sec. 892, and with the wrongful possession of 43.82 grams of heroin and the wrongful sale of heroin, both in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code, supra, 10 USC, Sec. 934, offenses over which courts-martial necessarily have jurisdiction whether committed on or off base (United States v Beeker, 18 USCMA 563, 40 CMR 275 (1969)), it is, by the Court, this 7th day of July 1971,

ORDERED:

That said application be, and the same is, hereby dismissed.
Petition for Exemption/Rulemaking

AEC Utility Solutions, LLC

1471 E. Commercial Dr.

Meridian, ID 83642

208-887-7748

AECUTS@gmail.com

Section 333 Exemption

AEC Utility Solutions, LLC is seeking exemption for section 333. We provide Video, Scanning & 

Photographic surveying, coordination and inspection services through the use of UAS's. Our equipment 

utilizes still photography, scanning and full videography in support of our mission.

We currently have full liability insurance, fly only VLOS, with a two man crew including a visual observer 

and a pilot. Both the visual observer and the pilot have been trained to man the vehicle's controls in the 

event of an emergency. Additionally all the flights are logged, remain under an altitude of 400 feet and 

with clearance of the local ATC.

Crew members are fully trained to fly in such a way that it will minimize the risk to public safety, as well 

as the natural environment within our area. Their flight time, at this time, is in excess of 40 hours, 

without incident or an accident.

All our equipment goes through a thorough maintenance & load checklist prior to take off, as well as 

utilizing an official preflight checklist. 

Our equipment includes a 4 rotor quad copter, currently we utilize the DJI Phantom 3 and Inspire 1

series, which carries a gimbal and a camera is not equipped to carry any individuals and remains under 

25 pounds at takeoff. Flight times of the aircraft are 20-25 minutes depending on the winds and 

weather. Landing always happens before we reach a 25% threshold within the battery's cells. The 

aircraft does not exceed a ground speed of 40 mph and is equipped to return to the GPS position of 

takeoff in the event of a failure.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7098]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,204]


Gildan Activewear Malone, Inc., Bombay, NY; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 27, 2007 in response to a worker 
petition filed a company official on behalf of workers at Gildan 
Activewear Malone, Inc., Bombay, New York.
    The petitioner has withdrawn the petition. Thus, this investigation 
is terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of April 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-7098 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 15.2  HAN KUN LAW OFFICES Suite 906, Office Tower C1, Oriental Plaza, 1 East Chang An Avenue, Beijing 100738, P.R. China TEL: (86 10) 8525-5500; FAX: (86 10) 8525-5511/5522  Date: April 29, 2013  Bona Film Group Limited 11/F, Guan Hu Garden 3 105 Yao Jia Yuan Road, Chaoyang District Beijing 100025, Peoples Republic of China  Dear Sir/Madam:  We hereby consent to the use of our name under the captions,Risk Factors in Item 3. Key Information, and Regulations of Our Industry and Organizational Structure in Item 4. Information of the Company, included in the Annual Report of Bona Film Group Limited for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the month of April 2013.  Yours Sincerely,  /s/ Han KunHan Kun Law Offices  1
| Name of Subsidiary                   | ​ | ​ | State of Incorporation or Organization | ​ |
|--------------------------------------|---------|---------|----------------------------------------|---------|
| EP Altus Investments, LLC            | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |
| EP American Energy Investments, Inc. | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |
| EP Burnett Investments, Inc.         | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |
| EP Northern Investments, LLC         | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |
| EP Synergy Investments, Inc.         | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |
| FS Energy Investments, LLC           | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |
| FS Power Investments, LLC            | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |
| FSEP Investments, Inc.               | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |
| FS Power Investments II, LLC         | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |
| FSEP-BBH, Inc.                       | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |
| Gladwyne Funding LLC                 | ​ | ​ | Delaware                               | ​ |

----
# Report of Analysis

Client Reference Number: Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant Client: Job Location:

### Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant, MA PO 4500018796 Vessel:

### Submitted Sample Our Reference Number: 

### US310-0005145 2009-NEWH-000193 Lab Reference Number:

Description Method Test Result Units
23-Oct-2009 #6 Fuel Oil Sample 11.4 API Gravity @ 60°F ASTM D4052 °API 2009-NEWH-000193-001 0.887 Sulfur Content ASTM D4294 Wt % B Procedure Used ASTM D93 >200 Corrected Flash Point °F 50 Temperature ASTM_D7042 °C 294.0 Viscosity cSt 138.9 Saybolt Furol viscosity, 122 °F ASTM D2161 SFS 18515 Gross BTU - LB ASTM D240 BTU/lb 152693 Gross BTU - Gal (Calculated) BTU/gal 0.05 Water and Sediment ASTM D1796 Vol % 0.061 Ash @ 775 °C ASTM D482 Wt % 3000 Nitrogen Content ASTM D5762 ppm 29 Vanadium Content ASTM D5863 mg/kg 16 Sodium Content mg/kg 88.41 Carbon Content ASTM D5291 Wt % 1 10.78 Hydrogen Content Wt %

1 Out of Scope of the Method

Signed: Date:
Syed Naqvi, Laboratory Manager Intertek

Tel.: (203) 467-3471 Fax.: (203) 467-8083 Email: cbw.nh@intertek.com 481A East Shore Parkway, New Haven, Connecticut 06512 USA Page 1 of 1 23-Oct-2009 15:25 US310-0005145 184867
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 65 (Thursday, April 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 20316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07870]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9799-1]

Draft Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System NPDES General 
Permit--New Hampshire; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a Notice of Availability of the draft Small 
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) National Pollutant 
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit for New Hampshire, 
published in the Federal Register on February 12, 2013. This notice 
extends the comment period for 30 days, from April 15, 2013 to May 15, 
2013.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 15, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments by one of the following methods:
     Email: Tedder.Newton@epa.gov.
     Mail: Newton Tedder, US EPA--Region 1, 5 Post Office 
Square--Suite 100, Mail Code--OEP06-4, Boston, MA 02109-3912.
    No facsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information concerning the 
draft permit may be obtained between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 
p.m. Monday through Friday excluding legal holidays from: Newton 
Tedder, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Environmental Protection 
Agency, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109-3912; 
telephone: 617-918-1038; email: Tedder.Newton@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice extends the public comment 
period established in the Federal Register issue of February 12, 2013 
(78 FR 9908) (FRL-13-006 and 9779-7). In that notice, EPA announced the 
availability for public comment of its draft small MS4 NPDES general 
permit for New Hampshire. This extension is in response to requests 
received from several commenters to extend the comment period. EPA is 
hereby extending the comment period, which was set to end on April 15, 
2013, to May 15, 2013.

    Dated: March 27, 2013.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2013-07870 Filed 4-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
# C_2008231EN.01S00301.xml

| 9.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READERThe institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

NOTE TO THE READERThe institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Clifton L.Cooke, Jr., certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSBof SYS;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; and

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated:  February 9, 2004 | By:    | /s/  Clifton L. Cooke, Jr. |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Clifton L.  Cooke, Jr.          |
|                          |   | Chief Executive  Officer        |

** **

----
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Julio Cesarde Toledo Piza Neto, certify that: 

1.       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of BrasilAgro – CompanhiaBrasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas; 

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 

4.       The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controlover financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15e-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a)      Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)      Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgeneral accepted accounting principles. 

(c)      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

(d)      Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.       The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)      Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-cr-154

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAVERS

LESLIE M. NARTEY, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On December 17, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Nartey’s guilty plea to an

Indictment charging him with fraudulently purchasing a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(g)

and 924(a)(2). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before

a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and

had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00154-GCS-EPD Doc #: 26 Filed: 01/10/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Indictment. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of fraudulently

purchasing a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(g) and 924(a)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00154-GCS-EPD Doc #: 26 Filed: 01/10/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 65646.

#### A. R. Neuer and Carmichael Forwarding Service *v.*United States,

protests 59/21495, 60/16584, and 60/20114 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.