APPENDIX B 

WETLANDS AND AQUATIC REPORT 

 
Aquatic Resource Report for the 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal 

Project

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC 

Monroe County, Ohio and 

Marshall County, West Virginia 

November 2019

Prepared for: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC 

43840 State Route 7 

Hannibal, Ohio 43931 

Prepared by: 

Tetra Tech, Inc. 

661 Andersen Drive 

Suite 200 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220 

Phone: (412) 921-7090 

Fax: (412) 921-4040 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

i 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................1

2.0 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................................2

2.1 Field Survey ...................................................................................................................................................2

2.2 Stream Identification ......................................................................................................................................3

2.3 Ohio EPA Stream Evaluations .......................................................................................................................3

2.4 Wetland Delineation .......................................................................................................................................4

2.4.1 Hydrophytic Vegetation ........................................................................................................................4

2.4.2 Hydric Soils ...........................................................................................................................................5

2.4.3 Wetland Hydrology ...............................................................................................................................5

2.5 ORAM Assessment ........................................................................................................................................6

3.0 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................................................7

3.1 Stream Identification and Evaluation .............................................................................................................7

3.2 Wetland Identification and Delineation ...........................................................................................................7

4.0 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................................9

5.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 10

 

FIGURES 

Figure 1: USGS Project Location Map 

Figures 2-1 to 2-3: NRCS Soils Map 

Figures 3A-1 to 3A-3: NWI Wetlands and NHD Streams Map 

Figures 3B-1 to 3B-3: OWI Wetlands Map 

Figure 4-INDEX: Aquatic Resource Location Index Map 

Figures 4-1 to 4-27: Aquatic Resource Location Map 

TABLES 

Table 1: Identified Wetlands 

Table 2: Identified Streams 

Table 3: Marshall County Hydric Soil List 

Table 4: Monroe County Hydric Soil List 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

ii 

APPENDICES 

Appendix A: Ohio EPA Stream Data Forms 

Appendix B: USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms 

Appendix C: ORAM Forms 

Appendix D: Resumes
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

iii 

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

Acronyms/Abbreviations Definition 

1987 Manual United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual 

Blue Racer Blue Racer Midstream 

CWH Cold Water Habitat 

EWH Exceptional Warm Water Habitat 

FAC Facultative 

FACU Facultative upland 

FACW Facultative wetland 

FR Federal Register 

GIS Geographic Information Systems 

GPS Global Positioning System 

HGM Hydrogeomorphic 

HHEI Headwater Habitat Evaluation Index 

HMFEI Headwater Macroinvertebrate Field Evaluation Index 

HUC Hydrologic Unit Code 

LRET Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC 

LRW Limited Resource Water 

MWH Modified Warm Water Habitat 

NGL Natural Gas Liquids 

NHD National Hydrography Dataset 

NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service 

NRPW Non-Relatively Permanent Waters 

NRPWW Wetlands adjacent to Non-Relatively Permanent Waters that flow directly or 

indirectly into Traditionally Navigable Waters 

NWI National Wetlands Inventory 

OAC Ohio Administrative Code 

OBL Obligate 

ODNR Ohio Department of Natural Resources 

OH Ohio 

Ohio EPA Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 

OHWM Ordinary High Water Mark 

ORAM Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands 

OWI Ohio Wetlands Inventory 

PEM Palustrine emergent 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

iv 

Acronyms/Abbreviations Definition 

PFO Palustrine forested 

PHWH Primary Headwater Habitats 

Project Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project 

PSS Palustrine scrub-shrub 

PUB Palustrine unconsolidated bottom 

QHEI Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index 

Regional Supplement Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: 

Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region, April 2012 

RPW Relatively Permanent Water 

RPWWD Wetlands directly abutting Relatively Permanent Waters that flow directly or 

indirectly into Traditionally Navigable Waters 

RPWWN Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting Relatively Permanent Waters 

that flow directly or indirectly into Traditionally Navigable Waters 

SRW State Resource Water 

SSH Seasonal Salmonid Habitat 

Tetra Tech Tetra Tech, Inc. 

TNW Traditionally Navigable Water 

TNWW Wetlands Adjacent to Traditionally Navigable Waters 

UNT Unnamed tributary 

UPL Upland 

USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers 

USDA United States Department of Agriculture 

USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency 

USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service 

USGS United States Geological Survey 

WV West Virginia 

WWH Warm Water Habitat 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

1 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC (LRET) is proposing the construction of a two-component project involving the 

installation of a new natural gas liquids (NGL) pipeline and a new transloading facility as part of the Long Ridge 

Energy Terminal Project (Project). The pipeline will transport NGL from the existing processing facility owned by 

Blue Racer Midstream (Blue Racer) in Natrium, West Virginia (WV) across the Ohio River into Ohio (OH) and 

ultimately terminate at the LRET transloading facility at Hannibal, OH. The transloading facility will facilitate loading 

NGL onto railcars for shipment to regional markets. The Project is located in Marshall County, WV and Monroe 

County, OH, as shown on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Project Location Map (Figure 1). The Project 

is in the Little Muskingum-Middle Island (Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 05030201) Watershed (USGS 2019). 

Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech), on behalf of LRET, prepared this Aquatic Resource Report summarizing the results 

of a field survey of the Project study area for the presence of wetlands and surface water features. Tetra Tech 

applied the methods detailed in the United States Arm Wetland Delineation Manual

(1987 Manual; Environmental Laboratory 1987), as amended by the Regional Supplement to the Corps of 

Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Version 2.0 (Regional 

Supplement; USACE 2012). 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

2 

2.0 METHODS 

The primary objective of the aquatic resource field survey is to identify and map potentially jurisdictional streams 

and wetlands for Project permitting; however, the survey also includes the identification and mapping of likely nonjurisdictional aquatic resources such as stormwater management features (e.g. stormwater retention ponds, ditches 

excavated wholly in and draining only uplands that do not carry a relatively permanent flow), drainage features, 

groundwater wells, and farm ponds. 

2.1 FIELD SURVEY 

Prior to the start of field surveys, an initial desktop analysis of the Project study area is conducted through a review 

of available Geographic Information Systems (GIS) resources. Information reviewed includes the following: 

 USGS topographic mapping (Figure 1; National Geographic Society, i-cubed 2013). 

 National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (Figures 2-1 to 2-3; NRCS 2017) 

mapping and data. 

 USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Best Resolution for Ohio (Figures 3A-1 to 3A-3; USGS 2019) 

 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping (Figures 3A1 to 3A-3; USFWS 2018). 

 Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) Ohio Wetlands Inventory (OWI) Mapping (Figures 3B-1 to 

3B-3; ODNR 2014) 

All features identified in the field, including stream reaches, wetlands, and wetland upland points, are given unique 

identification names (i.e. S-ID, W-ID, and W-ID-UPL, respectively). In addition, the NHD stream name (USGS 2017) 

for field identified streams is recorded on the stream data form (Appendix A) and listed in Table 1. Identified streams 

Identified stream reaches are mapped along their entire course within the study area by use of a Global Positioning 

System (GPS) receiver with sub-meter accuracy or better. The identified streams are shown on the Aquatic 

Resource Location Map (Figures 4-1 to 4-27). Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) stream data forms 

detailing stream characteristics are provided in Appendix A. Photographs and photograph location maps of each 

 stream data form. 

Wetland delineation involves the establishment of the wetland/upland boundary based on the identification of 

hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology indicators. This delineated wetland boundary is mapped 

in the field by use of a GPS receiver. Delineated wetlands are shown as closed or open boundary systems on the 

Aquatic Resource Location Map (Figures 4-1 to 4-27). Wetlands that continue beyond the delineated boundary 

shown on the Aquatic Resource Location Map are identified as open boundary wetland systems. Wetlands that do 

not continue beyond the delineated boundary shown on the Aquatic Resource Location Map are identified as closed 

boundary wetland systems. Data collected on vegetation, soils, and hydrology for identified wetlands and their 

associated upland points are recorded on USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms (Appendix B). Photographs 

respective USACE Wetland Determination Data Form. Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (ORAM) data 

forms are provided in Appendix C. 

Resumes of all personnel that performed the field surveys are provided in Appendix D. 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

3 

2.2 STREAM IDENTIFICATION 

Potentially jurisdictional streams are identified in the field by the presence of a continuous channel that exhibits 

evidence of frequent or reoccurring water flow such as a defined bed, bank, and an ordinary high-water mark 

(OHWM; USACE and United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] 2007). 

Physical and biological characteristics of the identified streams are evaluated to determine Flow Regime (82 Federal 

Register [FR] 1860, January 6, 2017), USACE Waters Type (USACE and USEPA 2007), and Cowardin 

classifications (Cowardin et al. 1979). Physical characteristics evaluated include, but are not limited to: channel 

morphology, substrate size and type, and base flow conditions. Biological characteristics evaluated include but are 

not limited to: the presence of fish, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and vegetation rooted within the OHWM. USACE 

Water Types (USACE and USEPA 2007) include: 

Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) 

 numerous decisions of the federal courts, plus all other waters that are navigable-in-fact. 

Relatively Permanent Waters (RPW) Streams that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs and where the flow 

 of water is continuous year-round or at least seasonally. 

Non-RPW (NRPW) Streams that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs where the flow of water is not 

 continuous at least seasonally. 

Flow Regimes (82 FR 1860, January 6, 2017) include: 

Perennial Streams that typically have flow year-round. Most of the hydrology for perennial streams is 

 derived from smaller upstream waters and/or groundwater sources with precipitation as a 

 supplemental hydrologic contributor. Perennial streams are classified as RPW or TNW USACE 

 Waters Types (USACE and USEPA 2007). 

Intermittent Streams with seasonal flow, typically during the wet season (winter through spring). At least 

 a portion of the hydrology for intermittent streams is derived from groundwater sources with 

 precipitation as a supplemental hydrologic contributor. Intermittent streams are classified as an 

 RPW USACE Waters Type (USACE and USEPA 2007). 

Ephemeral Rain-dependent streams flowing only after precipitation event. Precipitation driven run-off 

 from the localized surrounding landscape is the primary source of hydrology. Ephemeral streams 

 are different from non-jurisdictional ditches and drainages due to the presence of an observable 

 OHWM. Ephemeral streams are classified as an NRPW USACE Waters Type (USACE and USEPA 

 2007). 

2.3 OHIO EPA STREAM EVALUATIONS 

Streams with a watershed size greater than one square mile or where the predominant natural pool depth is greater 

than 40 centimeters (15.75 inches) are evaluated using the Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI) methods 

outlined in the Methods for Assessing Habitat in Flowing Waters: Using the Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index 

(QHEI; Ohio EPA 2006). The QHEI is a quantitative evaluation of physical stream characteristics which are 

important for supporting fish communities. Six individual metrics are scored then added; the total maximum score 

of this quantitative evaluation is 100. For headwater streams QHEI scores greater than or equal to 70 correspond 

to an excellent rating, 55 69 to a good rating, 43 54 to a rating of fair, 30 42 to a rating of poor, and less than 

30 to a rating of very poor. For streams with larger watersheds QHEI scores greater than or equal to 75 correspond 

to an excellent rating, 60 74 to a good rating, 45 59 to a rating of fair, 30 44 to a rating of poor, and less than 

30 to a rating of very poor. 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

4 

Headwater streams, defined by the Ohio EPA as streams with a drainage area less than one square mile, are 

evaluated using the Headwater Habitat Evaluation Index (HHEI) methods outlined in the Field Evaluation Manual 

 (Ohio EPA 2012). Level 1 Assessments are performed at all headwater 

streams identified within the Project study area. A Level 1 Assessment consists of a

physical characteristics using the HHEI. Level 2 and Level 3 Assessments are evaluations of the biological 

community and are not performed as part of this field survey. 

The results of the HHEI evaluation designate streams as either Modified Class I, Modified Class II, Class I, Class 

II, or Class III (Class IIIA or Class IIIB) Primary Headwater Habitats (PHWH). These designations are defined under 

Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 3745-1-07 as; 

Class I PHWH Ephemeral streams that have little or no aquatic life potential, except seasonally when 

flowing water is present for short time periods following precipitation or snow melt. 

Class II PHWH Intermittent or perennial streams that exhibit moderately diverse communities of warm 

water-adapted native fauna present either seasonally or year-round. The native fauna is characterized by 

species of vertebrates (temperature facultative species of amphibians and pioneering species of fish) and 

benthic macroinvertebrates. 

Class III PHWH Perennial streams in which the prevailing flow and temperature conditions are influenced 

by groundwater. They exhibit moderately diverse to highly diverse communities of cold water adapted native 

fauna present year-round. Class III PHWH streams are further divided into the two sub-classifications 

below; however, since Level 2 or 3 Assessments are not performed as part of this field survey, all Class III 

PHWH streams identified as part of this survey will be designated as Class IIIB PHWH streams, as per the 

 (Ohio EPA 2012). 

o Class IIIA Streams exhibit diverse communities of native fauna. 

o Class IIIB Streams exhibit superior species composition or diversity of native fauna. 

Modified PHWH Class I and Class II PHWH streams may be further classified as modified habitats if they 

are historically channelized watercourses, have permanent structures to impound free-flowing water, or 

otherwise have human induced channel modifications that are of long-lasting duration. 

An HHEI and QHEI may be completed in conjunction if a stream has watershed less than one square mile but 

exhibits predominant natural pools greater than 40 centimeters (15.75 inches) in depth. 

Stream designations are identified and classified in with OAC 3745-1 Water Quality Standards (OAC 2017). 

2.4 WETLAND DELINEATION 

Wetland delineations are conducted in accordance with the 1987 Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the 

Regional Supplement (USACE 2012). According to the 1987 Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987), an area is 

defined as a wetland if, under normal circumstances, it meets all three of the following criteria: predominance of 

hydrophytic vegetation (plants adapted for life in saturated soil conditions); hydric soils (soils formed under water, 

or in saturated conditions); and wetland hydrology (current or recent inundation or saturated soils at some time 

during the growing season). 

2.4.1 Hydrophytic Vegetation 

Hydrophytic vegetation is identified in the field based on the Regional Supplement (USACE 2012). Plant species 

representative of the habitats within the Project study area are identified to the species taxonomic level and the 

indicator status for each plant species is identified using The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 Wetland Ratings

(Lichvar 2016). Wetland indicator statuses are described below (Reed 1988): 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

5 

Obligate (OBL) almost always occurs in wetlands; estimated probability of occurrence in a wetland is 

 greater than 99 percent. 

Facultative Wetland (FACW) usually occurs in wetlands but may occur in non-wetlands; estimated 

 probability of occurrence in a wetland is 67 to 99 percent. 

Facultative (FAC) equally likely to occur in wetlands and non-wetlands; estimated probability of 

 occurrence in a wetland is 34 to 66 percent. 

Facultative Upland (FACU) usually occurs in non-wetlands but may occur in wetlands; estimated 

 probability of occurrence in a wetland is 1 to 33 percent. 

Upland (UPL) rarely occurs in wetlands; estimated probability of occurrence in a wetland is less than 1 

 percent. 

Hydrophytic vegetation includes species with an indicator status of OBL, FACW, or FAC. Hydrophytic vegetation 

decisions are based on the plant community typically present during the wet portion of the growing season during 

a normal rainfall year. In areas where human practices or natural events have influenced vegetation, procedures 

for difficult or problematic situations outlined in the Regional Supplement (USACE 2012) are followed. 

Wetlands habitat types are based on vegetation strata composition and are classified in accordance with the 

USFWS Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al. 1979): 

Palustrine emergent (PEM) contain emergent, herbaceous (non-woody) plants which are the tallest life 

 form with at least 30 percent aerial coverage. 

Palustrine scrub-shrub (PSS) contain woody plants less than six meters (20 feet) in height which are the 

 tallest life form with at least 30 percent aerial coverage, or, when trees or shrubs alone cover less 

 than 30 percent of an area but in combination cover 30 percent or more. Trees are defined as 

 woody plants at least six meters (20 feet) in height, and shrubs are defined as woody plants less 

 than six meters (20 feet) in height. 

Palustrine forested (PFO) contain woody plants at least six meters (20 feet) in height which are the tallest 

 life form with at least 30 percent aerial coverage. 

Palustrine unconsolidated bottom (PUB) contain all wetland and deepwater habitats with at least 25 

 percent cover of particles smaller than stones, and a vegetative cover of less than 30 percent. 

2.4.2 Hydric Soils 

Hydric soils are identified in the field based on the 1987 Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987), Regional 

Supplement (USACE 2012), and Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (United States Department of 

Agriculture [USDA] 2010). Based on prior experience, the presence of field-identified hydric soils does not always 

align with NRCS mapped hydric soils units. The NRCS soil units represent a large geographic area and are based 

on broad geologic and historic conditions. The methods used in the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United 

States (USDA 2010) are used to determine hydric soil conditions on a localized scale. A review of the NRCS 

mapped hydric soils units is used to initially identify areas that have the potential to contain wetlands (See Section 

3.2); however, wetland delineation boundaries are based on the presence of field identified hydric soils. In cases 

where soils are found to be disturbed or problematic, determinations may rely on the NRCS mapped hydric soil 

units (USACE 2012). 

2.4.3 Wetland Hydrology 

Wetland hydrology indicators are identified in the field based on the 1987 Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) 

and Regional Supplement (USACE 2012). Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) and Water Type classifications are assigned 

to wetlands based on their hydrologic source and connectivity to streams. HGM classifications are based on A 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

6 

Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands (Brinson 1993); a summary of HGM classifications commonly used 

in the Project region is described below: 

Riverine Wetlands occur in floodplains and riparian corridors in association with stream channels. 

Depressional Wetlands occur in topographic depressions. Dominant water sources are precipitation 

 ground water discharge, and both interflow and overland flow from adjacent uplands. 

Slope Wetlands normally are found where there is a discharge of ground water to the land surface. They 

 normally occur on sloping land; elevation gradients may range from steep hillsides to slight slopes. 

Wetland USACE Water Types (USACE and USEPA 2007) include: 

TNWW Wetlands adjacent to TNWs. 

RPWWD Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. 

RPWWN Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. 

NRPWW Wetlands adjacent to NRPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. 

Isolate Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands. 

Current wetland hydrology indicators, inundation/saturation visible on aerial imagery, and estimates of the effects 

of ditches and subsurface drainage systems are all considered when making decisions regarding wetland hydrology 

in areas where human practices or natural events may have altered wetland hydrology. 

2.5 ORAM ASSESSMENT 

The Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (ORAM) is used to assess the ecological quality and level of 

function of each identified wetland system as required by the Ohio EPA. The assessments are conducted using the 

methods in the g Forms (Mack 

2001). The ORAM uses metrics relating to wetland size, adjacent upland land use, hydrology, habitat alteration, 

special habitats, and plant communities to calculate and assign each wetland system to a Category. Wetlands are 

designated as either Category 1, Category 2, Modified Category 2, or Category 3. These categories correspond to 

wetlands of low, medium, and high quality, respectively. 

Wetlands may be scored together in circumstances where wetlands are small (< 1 acre), located near each other 

within the same forest, floodplain, soil mapping unit, field, etc., and are separated from each other by relatively 

narrow areas of non-wetland (Mack 2001). 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

7 

3.0 RESULTS 

Tetra Tech performed field surveys for Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project between July 17th and November 12th, 

2019. Surveys were limited to the Project study area illustrated on Figures 1 through 4. The field surveys identified 

30 streams reaches and 26 wetlands within the Project study area. The Aquatic Resource Location Map (Figures 

4-1 to 4-27) illustrate the wetland and stream locations in relation to the Project study area. Tables 1 and 2 

summarize stream and wetland information for all identified streams reaches and wetlands. Ohio EPA stream data 

forms (HHEI and/or QHEI) are included in Appendix A, Wetland Determination Data Forms for wetlands and their 

associated upland points are included in Appendix B, and ORAM Data Forms are provided in Appendix C. 

This aquatic resource report represents our best professional judgment and is based on site conditions at the time 

of the field investigation. However, final authority over the determinations made during these surveys rests with the 

Ohio EPA and the USACE. 

3.1 STREAM IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION 

Thirty stream reaches were identified in the Project study area based on our review of available GIS mapping data, 

evidence collected during field surveys, and best professional judgment. A summary of the data for each identified 

stream reach is provided in Table 1. Table 1 shows the stream reach field identification name, the NHD stream 

name, stream location, Flow Regime classification, Water Type classification, Cowardin classification, HHEI and/or 

QHEI score, HHEI class and/or QHEI narrative rating, bank full width, (in meters and feet), and flow direction, and 

Figure 4 sheet location. Ohio EPA Stream data forms (HHE and/or QHEI) data forms are provided for each stream 

reach in Appendix A. Photographs and photograph location maps of each identified stream reach are included 

 stream data form. 

3.2 WETLAND IDENTIFICATION AND DELINEATION 

NRCS, USFWS NWI, and ODNR OWI mapping were reviewed for the initial desktop analysis of the Project study 

area to identify areas that may have the potential to contain wetlands. Tables 3 and 4 summarize the NRCS hydric 

soils list for Marshall County, WV and Monroe County, OH. The NRCS soil survey mapping units are shown on 

Figures 2-1 to 2-3. A review of the USFWS NWI and ODNR OWI mapping indicates that one NWI wetland and one 

OWI wetland are mapped in the Project study area (Figures 3A-1 to 3A-3, Figure 3B-1 to 3B-3). The single NWI 

mapped wetland within the Project study area is a palustrine unconsolidated bottom, intermittently exposed, 

diked/impounded (PUBGh) wetland that correlates with field delineated PEM wetlands W-WJKM04a and WWJKM04b (Figure 3A-2 and Figure 4-13). The single OWI mapped wetland within the Project study area is a PEM 

wetland that lies within the banks of the Ohio River (Figure 3B-1 and Figure 4-2). 

Twenty-six wetlands are located within the Project study area based on our review of available GIS mapping data, 

evidence collected during field surveys, and best professional judgment. 

A summary of each wetland identified and delineated within the Project study area is provided in Table 2. Table 2 

shows the location of each wetland, Cowardin classification, HGM classification, Waters Type classification, the 

identity of any associated (i.e. abutting or adjacent) waterbodies, wetland size within the Project study area (in acres 

and square feet), whether the wetland boundary is open or closed (see Section 2.1), ORAM score and Category, 

and Figure 4 sheet location. Wetlands with multiple Cowardin types (e.g. PEM and PSS) are considered a single 

wetland system and are counted as one wetland. The wetland size provided in Table 2 represents the size of the 

delineated wetland boundary shown on Figures 4-1 to 4-27. Open boundary wetlands continue beyond the 

delineated wetland boundary shown on Figures 4-1 to 4-27; therefore, the total wetland size of open boundary 

wetlands may be larger than the size provided in Table 2. 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

8 

USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms detailing the existing vegetation, soil characteristics, and hydrology for 

each wetland and its associated upland point are provided in Appendix B. Photographs and photograph location 

pective USACE Wetland 

Determination Data Form. ORAM data forms are provided in Appendix C. 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

9 

4.0 CONCLUSION 

During the field survey of the Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project, 30 stream reaches and 26 wetlands were 

identified within the Project study area. A summary of identified stream reach and wetland data is provided in Tables 

1 and 2 and locations of all streams and wetlands are shown on the Aquatic Resource Location Map (Figures 4-1 

to 4-27). 

This Aquatic Resource Report represents our best professional judgment and is based on site conditions at the 

time of the field survey. However, final authority over the determinations made during this survey rests with the Ohio 

EPA and the USACE
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

10 

5.0 REFERENCES 

Brinson M.M. 1993. A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DE-4. U.S. Army 

Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. 

Cowardin L.M., Carter V., Golet F.C., and LaRoe E.T. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of 

the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 

Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-

1.United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. 

Lichvar R.W., Banks D.L., Kirchner W.N., and Melvin N.C. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland 

ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X 

Mack JJ. 2001. Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands Manual and Scoring Forms. Ohio 

EPA Technical Bulletin Wetland/2001-1-1. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface 

Water, 401 Wetland Ecology Unit, Columbus, Ohio. 

National Geographic Society, i-cubed. 2013. USA Topo Maps. Available at: 

http://services.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/rest/services/USA_Topo_Maps/MapServer/0

NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service), United States Department of Agriculture. 2017. Web Soil 

Survey. Updated August 21, 2017. Available at: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/ 

OAC Chapter 3745-1 Water Quality Standards. 6 February 2017. http://epa.ohio.gov/dsw/rules/3745_1.aspx. 

ODNR Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2014. Ohio Wetlands Inventory Mapping. 

http://geospatial.ohiodnr.gov/data-metadata/search-by-category 

Ohio EPA. 2012. . Ohio EPA 

Division of Surface Water, Columbus, Ohio. 

Ohio EPA. 2006. Methods for Assessing Habitat in Flowing Waters: Using the Qualitative Habitat Evaluation 

Index (QHEI). Ohio EPA Technical Bulletin EAS/2006-06-1. Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water, 

Groveport, Ohio. 

Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: 1988 national summary. Biological 

report 88(24). Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers) and USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 

2007. Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. Available at: 

https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Regulatory-Program-and-Permits/RelatedResources/CWA-Guidance/ 

USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers). 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland 

Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Version 2.0, ed. J.F Berkowitz, J.S. 

Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-12-9. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research 

and Development Center. 

USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), Natural Resources Conservation Services. 2010. Field 

Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0. LM. Vasalis, G.W. Hurt, and C.V.Noble (eds.). 

USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2018. National Wetlands Inventory website. U.S. Department 

of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Updated October 15, 2018. Available at: 

http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/ 
Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Aquatic Resource Report

11 

USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2019. National Hydrography Dataset Best Resolution for Ohio. 

https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/?basemap=b1&category=nhd&title=NHD%20View 
FIGURES 

Figure 1: USGS Project Location Map 

Figures 2-1 to 2-3: NRCS Soils Map 

Figures 3A-1 to 3A-3: NWI Wetlands and NHD Streams Map 

Figures 3B-1 to 3B-3: OWI Wetlands Map 

Figure 4-INDEX: Aquatic Resource Location Index Map 

Figures 4-1 to 4-27: Aquatic Resource Location Map 
Notes:

1) Topographic map provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

USA Topo Maps map service (© 2013 National 

Geographic Society, i-cubed).

2) Quadrangle(s) displayed: Cameron, Powhatan Point,

Round Bottom, and New Martinsville.

±

2,5000 2,500

Feet 1 inch = 2,500 feet

Legend

Study Area

FIGURE 1

USGS PROJECT LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19
GkG

W

Ma

GlG

GkG

GwD2

GwG2

GrE2

GwE2

GkE2

GkE2

GkG

WmW1D2

VdE

GrC2

GkD2

GrD2

GrE2

GkD2

WhD2

GkD2

GkE2

GwD2

GkE2

GrE2

VdE

GkD2

GkE2

GrE2

GoE2

GoC2

GkG

GoC2

GkE2

GkE2

WmW1D2

GwE2

GkE2

GkE2

BwD2

GoC2

GoD2

ZoC2

GkE2

GkE2

W

Uh

WhB BrB

Uh

BrD

W

GwD2

GwD2

GkE2

GkD2

GoG2

GrE2

GoD2

GrG2

GwE2

GwD2

GkE2

WmW1D2

GrD2

GrE2

GkD

GkE2

ZoC2

GoG2

WmW1D2

WhD2

GkD2

GkE2

GkG

GkG

GkE2

GkD2

GkE2

GkD

WmW1D2

GoD2

WhD2

GkG

GkE2

UpC2

GkG

GkD2

GkE2

GwD2

GkE2

ZoC2

GkC2

WhD2

WmW1D2

GkE2

GoG2

GoE2

GwG2

GoD2

WmW1D2

GoC2

GkD GkE2

wG2

GkD

WmW1D2

GkE

GrE2

WrC

rE2

GsG

Gk

kD2

LaC BrC

BrC

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

2) NRCS Soils data provided by the NRCS, United States 

Department of Agriculture, Web Soil Survey (2017).

±

1,000 0 1,000

Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet

Legend

Study Area

Natural Resources Conservation

Service (NRCS) Soils & Code

2-1

2-2

2-3

FIGURE 2-1

NRCS SOILS MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19
GkG

GkG

GkE2

Chg1AF

GlG

SsE

W

VdE

GoE2

GkG

GwG2

GkE2

GrE2

GkE2

GkG

GoE2 GkG

GrG2

GkD2

GrE2

GrD2

GkE2

GsG

GkG

GuG

WxB

VdE

GwE2

GrG2

GsG

GkG3

GkD2

GkE2

GkE2

GrG2

GkG

GrD2

GsG

GkG

GkD2

GsG

GwD2

GoE2

GwE2

GkE2

WxB

GrG2

GkD2

GkE2

GkG

GsG

GoD2

SsD

He

He

GrE2

GkE2

GwD2

GsG

GoG2

GkG3

GrG2

GoE2

KlD2

GwE2

GrD2

GoD2

WyC

GkG

GkD

GrD2

GkD

GkG

WhD2

WmW1D2

WmW1D2

GkD2

GkG

GkD2

GoD2

GwD2

GkD2

GkD2

GwD2

GkD2

GwE2

GkD

GkE2

GkD2

Wml1D2

GwG2

GwD2

WmW1D2

GoC2

GoD2

GkD

GoG2

GsG

WmW1D2

GwG2

GkE2

KlD2

WyC

GwD2

He

WhD2

KlD2

GwD2

WhD2

GoE2

GkG

BwD2 GwD2

GrD2

GwG2

VdE

SsE

GkD

Wml1D2

GoG2

HcB

WmW1D2

GoD2

GkG

GrD2

GwD2

WmW1D2

Wml1D2

GoG2

Nn

GkD2

GwE2

GoG2

WmW1D2

GkC2

Omm1C1

WtC2

SsE

WmW1D2

WrC2

wG2

GkE2

GwD2

WmW1D2

GoG2

wE2

GrG2

GkD2

oE2

GkD WmW1D2 Ma

GwD

WmW1D2

GrE

kE2

oC2

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

2) NRCS Soils data provided by the NRCS, United States 

Department of Agriculture, Web Soil Survey (2017).

±

1,000 0 1,000

Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet

Legend

Study Area

Natural Resources Conservation

Service (NRCS) Soils & Code

2-1

2-2

2-3

FIGURE 2-2

NRCS SOILS MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19
Ma

GkG

W

GkE2

GlG

GkD

GkE2

VdE

GrE2

GsG

SsE

GkE2

Hu

VaD

Hu

GoE2

GkG

GkE2

GkE2

GoE2

GkD2

VdE

GkE2

ScB

WrC2

HcB

GoD2

W

GrF

GpF

GpF Hu VaE GpD

GkG

GwD2

GkD2

Lh

GnE

Nn

GrD2

GwG2

GwE2

Wml1D2

GkG

GrD2

GkD

WmW1D2

GkE2

WrC2

GkG KlD2

SsE

Wml1D2

WmW1D2

WtC2

GoD2

GkD2 WhD2

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

2) NRCS Soils data provided by the NRCS, United States 

Department of Agriculture, Web Soil Survey (2017).

±

1,000 0 1,000

Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet

Legend

Study Area

Natural Resources Conservation

Service (NRCS) Soils & Code

2-1

2-2

2-3

FIGURE 2-3

NRCS SOILS MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19
PUBHh

PUBHh

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online World Imagery map service

(© 2015 ESRI and its data suppliers).

2) NWI wetlands provided by United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, 2018).

3) Dahl, T.E., J. Dick, J. Swords, and B.O. Wilen. 2015. Data Collection Requirements 

and Procedures for Mapping Wetland, Deepwater and Related Habitats of the United 

States.Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation (version 2), National Standards 

and Support Team, Madison, WI. 92 p.

4) USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Best Resolution for Virginia (2019).

±

1,000 0 1,000

Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet

Legend

Study Area

National Wetlands Inventory

(NWI) Wetland & Code

National Hydrography Dataset

(NHD) Streams 3A-1

3A-2

3A-3

FIGURE 3A-1

NWI WETLANDS AND PADEP 

CHAPTER 93 STREAMS MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/2019 Approved: HS 11/21/19
PEM1C

PUBGh

PEM1A

PEM1C

PEM1C

PUBGh

PEM1A

PEM1C

PUBGx

PEM1C

PUBGh

PEM1A

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online World Imagery map service

(© 2015 ESRI and its data suppliers).

2) NWI wetlands provided by United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, 2018).

3) Dahl, T.E., J. Dick, J. Swords, and B.O. Wilen. 2015. Data Collection Requirements 

and Procedures for Mapping Wetland, Deepwater and Related Habitats of the United 

States.Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation (version 2), National Standards 

and Support Team, Madison, WI. 92 p.

4) USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Best Resolution for Virginia (2019).

±

1,000 0 1,000

Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet

Legend

Study Area

National Wetlands Inventory

(NWI) Wetland & Code

National Hydrography Dataset

(NHD) Streams

3A-1

3A-2

3A-3

FIGURE 3A-2

NWI WETLANDS AND PADEP 

CHAPTER 93 STREAMS MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/2019 Approved: HS 11/21/19
PEM1A

PUBGx

PEM1C

PUBGx

PSS1/EM1Cd

PUBGx

PUBGx

PUBHh

PUBGx

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online World Imagery map service

(© 2015 ESRI and its data suppliers).

2) NWI wetlands provided by United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, 2018).

3) Dahl, T.E., J. Dick, J. Swords, and B.O. Wilen. 2015. Data Collection Requirements 

and Procedures for Mapping Wetland, Deepwater and Related Habitats of the United 

States.Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation (version 2), National Standards 

and Support Team, Madison, WI. 92 p.

4) USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Best Resolution for Virginia (2019).

±

1,000 0 1,000

Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet

Legend

Study Area

National Wetlands Inventory

(NWI) Wetland & Code

National Hydrography Dataset

(NHD) Streams

3A-1

3A-2

3A-3

FIGURE 3A-3

NWI WETLANDS AND PADEP 

CHAPTER 93 STREAMS MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/2019 Approved: HS 11/21/19
Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

2) ODNR Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2014. 

Ohio Wetlands Inventory Mapping. http://geospatial.ohiodnr.

gov/data-metadata/search-by-category

±

1,000 0 1,000

Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet

Legend

Study Area

Ohio Wetlands Invetory (OWI) Wetland & Code

Palustrine Emergent Wetland

Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland

3B-1

3B-2

3B-3

FIGURE 3B-1

OWI WETLANDS MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19
Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

2) ODNR Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2014. 

Ohio Wetlands Inventory Mapping. http://geospatial.ohiodnr.

gov/data-metadata/search-by-category

±

1,000 0 1,000

Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet

Legend

Study Area

Ohio Wetlands Invetory (OWI) Wetland & Code

Palustrine Emergent Wetland

Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland

3B-1

3B-2

3B-3

FIGURE 3B-2

OWI WETLANDS MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19
Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

2) ODNR Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2014. 

Ohio Wetlands Inventory Mapping. http://geospatial.ohiodnr.

gov/data-metadata/search-by-category

±

1,000 0 1,000

Feet 1 inch = 1,000 feet

Legend

Study Area

Ohio Wetlands Invetory (OWI) Wetland & Code

Palustrine Emergent Wetland

Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland

3B-1

3B-2

3B-3

FIGURE 3B-3

OWI WETLANDS MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19




























TABLES 

Table 1: Identified Streams 

Table 2: Identified Wetlands 

Table 3: Marshall County Hydric Soil List 

Table 4: Monroe County Hydric Soil List 


Table 3. Marshall County County Hydric Soils List Marshall County, West Virginia Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Component Name and Phase Component Percent Landforms BrB Brookside silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Typic Epiaqualfs 5 closed depressions CaA Chagrin silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded Holly 5 flood plains CcA Chagrin silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, protected Melvin 3 flood plains CfA Chagrin-Melvin complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded Melvin, frequently flooded 35 backswamps ChA Cotaco silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Melvin, silt loam, occasionally flooded 5 stream terraces CkA Cotaco silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded Melvin 5 flood plains GfA Ginat silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Ginat 80 backswamps GfA Ginat silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Typic Epiaqualfs, rarely flooded 8 backswamps GnB Glenford silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Sebring 5 terraces LnA Lindside silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded Melvin, occasionally flooded 5 flood plains LoA Lobdell silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded Melvin 5 flood plains LoA Lobdell silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded Holly 5 flood plains MeA Melvin silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded Melvin 80 flood plains MoB Monongahela silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Purdy 5 terraces MoC Monongahela silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Purdy 5 terraces OmB Omulga silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Ginat 2 terraces OmC Omulga silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Ginat 2 terraces SeA Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded Melvin 5 flood plains SkA Skidmore gravelly loam, occasionally flooded Melvin, occasionally flooded 3 flood plains TgB Taggart silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Ginat 5 stream terraces TrA Taggart silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded Ginat, rarely flooded 5 stream terraces UnA Urban land-Chagrin complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded Melvin 3 flood plains UpA Urban land-Cotaco complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Melvin 5 flood plains UtA Urban land-Melvin complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded Melvin, rarely flooded, drained 35 backswamps UvC Urban land-Omulga complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes Ginat 2 terraces Modified from Hydric Soils of the United States (NRCS, 2016) Page 1 of 1
Table . Monroe County Hydric Soils List Monroe County, Ohio Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Component Name and Phase Component Percent Landforms BsD2 Brookside silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded poorly drained soils 10 hills Chg1AF Chagrin silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded Melvin 2 depressions, flood plains Hr Hartshorn silt loam, wet variant poorly drained soils 10 depressions KnL1AF Kinnick-Lindside silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded Melvin 5 depressions, flood plains Lh Lindside silt loam poorly drained soils 5 abandoned channels New1AF Newark silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded Melvin 5 flood plains Nm Newark silt loam, frequently flooded Poorly drained soils 15 depressions Nn Newark silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded Melvin, frequently flooded 5 flood plains No Newark Variant silt loam, frequently flooded Poorly drained soils 15 channels ScB Sciotoville silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes poorly drained soils 2 closed depressions Modified from Hydric Soils of the United States (NRCS, 2016) Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX A: OHIO EPA STREAM DATA FORMS 
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

< 0.01

228 39.75272 -80.87066

0%

0.61 m 0.61 5

20

Modified Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Ohio River 1,177.00

Powhatan Point

Salem

11/01/19 1.05

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
1

South

2

NNE

3

NE

4

SSW

S-WJKM01
9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

< 0.01

104 39.75287 -80.87065

0%

0.30 m 0.30

Modified Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Ohio River 1,207.00

Powhatan Point

Salem

11/01/19 1.05

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
5

South

6

South

7

NE

8

NW

S-WJKM02
9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

< 0.01

52 39.75270 -80.87063

0%

Modified Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Ohio River 1,255.00

Powhatan Point

Salem

11/01/19 1.05

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
9

ENE

10

NE

11

SW

12

SW

S-WJKM03
9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

< 0.01

207 39.75255 -80.87120

1.22 m 1.22 15

47
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Ohio River 1,529.00

Powhatan Point

Salem

11/01/19 1.05

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
13

North

14

South

15

NW

16

North

S-WJKM04
9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

0.04

267 39.75155 -80.87187

13 cm

1.52 m 1.52
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Ohio River 1,755.00

Powhatan Point

Salem

11/01/19 1.05

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
17

West

18

East

19

West

20

East

S-WJKM05
24

23

22

21

20

18 17

19

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

0.04

30 39.75164 -80.87169

0%

15%

25%

0.61 m 0.61

100%
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Ohio River 1,872.00

Powhatan Point

Salem

11/01/19 1.05

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
21

North

22

North

23

South

24

North

S-WJKM06
24

23

22

21

20

18 17

19

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

< 0.01

209 39.74999 -80.87172

0%

10%

25%

0.46 m 0.46

100%
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Ohio River 1,935.00

Powhatan Point

Salem

11/01/19 1.05

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
25

SW

26

NE

27

NW

28

North

S-WJKM07
28

27

26

25

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-WJKM08 Ohio 0.12

304 39.74249 -80.87082

11/06/19 KMM, WJ

20%

25%

30%

5%

40

2.44

32

80.00%

3

100%

20

20

7

S-WJKM08 Class 3

%

%
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

70.0

Ohio River 3,452.00

New Martinsville

Monroe Salem

11/01/19 1.05

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
29

West

30

NW

31

SW

32

WNW

S-WJKM08 11/06/19
W-WJKM02

W-WJKM02-UPL 504 SqFt

8

6

7 5

32

31

30

29

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index

and Use Assessment Field Sheet

_ _ _._ _ _/ _ _/ 06

_ _ _- _ _ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Maximum

20

Maximum

20

Maximum

20

Maximum

10

Maximum

12

EPA 4520 06/16/06

Maximum

8

Maximum

10

(NAD 83 - decimal o) _ _ . _ _ _ _ /8_ . _ _ _ _

Recreation Potential

(circle one and comment on back)

1]

BEST TYPES POOL RIFFLE OTHER TYPES POOL RIFFLE

LIMESTONE [1]

TILLS [1]

WETLANDS [0]

HARDPAN [0]

SANDSTONE [0]

RIP/RAP [0]

LACUSTURINE [0]

SHALE [-1]

COAL FINES [-2]

ORIGIN QUALITY

Check ONE (Or 2 & average)

Check Two substrate TYPE BOXES;

estimate % or note every type present

HEAVY [-2]

MODERATE [-1]

NORMAL [0]

FREE [1]

EXTENSIVE [-2]

MODERATE [-1]

NORMAL [0]

NONE [1]

SILT

(Score natural substrates; ignore

4 or more [2] sludge from point-sources)

3 or less [0]

NUMBER OF BEST TYPES:

HARDPAN [4]

DETRITUS [3]

MUCK [2]

SILT [2]

ARTIFICIAL [0]

BLDR /SLABS [10]

BOULDER [9]

COBBLE [8]

GRAVEL [7]

SAND [6]

BEDROCK [5]

2] Indicate presence 0 to 3: 0-Absent; 1-Very small amounts or if more common of marginal

quality; 2-Moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest

quality; 3-Highest quality in moderate or greater amounts (e.g., very large boulders in deep or fast water, large

diameter log that is stable, well developed rootwad in deep / fast water, or deep, well-defined, functional pools.

UNDERCUT BANKS [1]

OVERHANGING VEGETATION [1]

SHALLOWS (IN SLOW WATER) [1]

ROOTMATS [1]

POOLS > 70cm [2]

ROOTWADS [1]

BOULDERS [1]

OXBOWS, BACKWATERS [1]

AQUATIC MACROPHYTES [1]

LOGS OR WOODY DEBRIS [1]

EXTENSIVE >75% [11]

MODERATE 25-75% [7]

SPARSE 5-<25% [3]

NEARLY ABSENT <5% [1]

AMOUNT

Check ONE (Or 2 & average)

3] Check ONE in each category (Or 2 & average)

SINUOSITY

HIGH [4]

MODERATE [3]

LOW [2]

NONE [1]

DEVELOPMENT

EXCELLENT [7]

GOOD [5]

FAIR [3]

POOR [1]

CHANNELIZATION

NONE [6]

RECOVERED [4]

RECOVERING [3]

RECENT OR NO RECOVERY [1]

STABILITY

HIGH [3]

MODERATE [2]

LOW [1]

4] Check ONE in each category for (Or 2 per bank & average)

River right looking downstream

EROSION

NONE / LITTLE [3]

MODERATE [2]

HEAVY / SEVERE [1]

L R

POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [2]

POOL WIDTH = RIFFLE WIDTH [1]

POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [0]

Check ONE (ONLY!)

Indicate for reach - pools and riffles.

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOOD PLAIN QUALITY L R

FOREST, SWAMP [3]

SHRUB OR OLD FIELD [2]

RESIDENTIAL, PARK, NEW FIELD [1]

FENCED PASTURE [1]

OPEN PASTURE, ROWCROP [0]

L R

CONSERVATION TILLAGE [1]

URBAN OR INDUSTRIAL [0]

MINING / CONSTRUCTION [0]

L R

Indicate predominant land use(s)

past 100m riparian.

WIDE > 50m [4]

MODERATE 10-50m [3]

NARROW 5-10m [2]

VERY NARROW < 5m [1]

NONE [0]

5]

MAXIMUM DEPTH

> 1m [6]

0.7-<1m [4]

0.4-<0.7m [2]

0.2-<0.4m [1]

< 0.2m [0]

CHANNEL WIDTH CURRENT VELOCITY

SLOW [1]

INTERSTITIAL [-1]

INTERMITTENT [-2]

EDDIES [1]

Check ONE (Or 2 & average) Check ALL that apply

TORRENTIAL [-1]

VERY FAST [1]

FAST [1]

MODERATE [1]

Indicate for functional riffles; Best areas must be large enough to support a population

of riffle-obligate species: Check ONE (Or 2 & average).

RIFFLE DEPTH

BEST AREAS > 10cm [2]

BEST AREAS 5-10cm [1]

BEST AREAS < 5cm

RUN DEPTH

MAXIMUM > 50cm [2]

MAXIMUM < 50cm [1]

RIFFLE / RUN SUBSTRATE RIFFLE / RUN EMBEDDEDNESS

STABLE (e.g., Cobble, Boulder) [2]

MOD. STABLE (e.g., Large Gravel) [1]

UNSTABLE (e.g., Fine Gravel, Sand) [0]

NONE [2]

LOW [1]

MODERATE [0]

EXTENSIVE [-1] [metric=0]

NO RIFFLE [metric=0]

6] ( ft/mi)

DRAINAGE AREA

( mi2)

%POOL:

%RUN:

%GLIDE:

%RIFFLE:

VERY LOW - LOW [2-4]

MODERATE [6-10]

HIGH - VERY HIGH [10-6]

S-WJKM08 (Bishop Run)

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

5.0

50

10

39.742491, -80.870818

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

13.0

70.0
Comment RE: Reach consistency/ Is reach typical of steam?, Recreation/ Observed - Inferred, Other/ Sampling observations, Concerns, Access directions, etc. AREA DEPTH >100ft2 >3ft METHOD BOAT WADE L. LINE OTHER DISTANCE 0.5 Km 0.2 Km 0.15 Km 0.12 Km OTHER meters CANOPY > 85%- OPEN 55%-<85% 30%-<55% 10%-<30% <10%- CLOSED Check ALL that apply CLARITY < 20 cm 20-<40 cm 40-70 cm > 70 cm/ CTB SECCHI DEPTHcm 1st --sample pass-- 2nd STAGE HIGH UPNORMAL LOW DRY 1st -sample pass- 2ndcm 1stpass 2nd NUISANCE ALGAE INVASIVE MACROPHYTES EXCESS TURBIDITY DISCOLORATION FOAM / SCUM OIL SHEEN TRASH / LITTER NUISANCE ODOR SLUDGE DEPOSITS CSOs/SSOs/OUTFALLS PUBLIC / PRIVATE / BOTH / NA ACTIVE / HISTORIC / BOTH / NA YOUNG-SUCCESSION-OLD SPRAY / SNAG / REMOVED MODIFIED / DIPPED OUT / NA LEVEED / ONE SIDED RELOCATED / CUTOFFS MOVING-BEDLOAD-STABLE ARMOURED / SLUMPS ISLANDS / SCOURED IMPOUNDED / DESICCATED FLOOD CONTROL / DRAINAGE Circle some & COMMENT WWTP / CSO / NPDES / INDUSTRY HARDENED / URBAN / DIRT&GRIME CONTAMINATED / LANDFILL BMPs-CONSTRUCTION-SEDIMENT LOGGING / IRRIGATION / COOLING BANK / EROSION / SURFACE FALSE BANK / MANURE / LAGOON WASH H20 / TILE / H20 TABLE ACID / MINE / QUARRY / FLOW NATURAL / WETLAND / STAGNANT PARK / GOLF / LAWN / HOME ATMOSPHERE / DATA PAUCITY x width x depth max. depth x bankfull width bankfull x depth W/D ratio bankfull max. depth floodprone x2 width entrench. ratio 12' 2' 8' 5"
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

< 0.01

49 39.73569 -80.86489

0%

60%

0.30 m 0.30

100%

Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Oppossum Creek 1,083.00

New Martinsville

Salem

0.44

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
33

West

34

SW

35

NW

36

East

S-WJKM09
35

34

33

36

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-WJKM10 Ohio 0.49

275 39.73121 -80.86357

11/07/19 KMM, WJ Moderate rianfall during surveys

5%

20%

50%

5%

10%

5%

5%

7

45

6.10

32

80.00%

39

100%

20

30

89

S-WJKM10 Class 3
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

70.0

Opossum Creek 0.44

New Martinsville

Monroe Salem

11/07/19 0.44

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

mi.
37

North

38

NNW

39

NW

40

East

S-WJKM10 11/07/19
52

51

50 49

46

47

45

48

44

43

42

41

37

40

39 38

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index

and Use Assessment Field Sheet

_ _ _._ _ _/ _ _/ 06

_ _ _- _ _ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Maximum

20

Maximum

20

Maximum

20

Maximum

10

Maximum

12

EPA 4520 06/16/06

Maximum

8

Maximum

10

(NAD 83 - decimal o) _ _ . _ _ _ _ /8_ . _ _ _ _

Recreation Potential

(circle one and comment on back)

1]

BEST TYPES POOL RIFFLE OTHER TYPES POOL RIFFLE

LIMESTONE [1]

TILLS [1]

WETLANDS [0]

HARDPAN [0]

SANDSTONE [0]

RIP/RAP [0]

LACUSTURINE [0]

SHALE [-1]

COAL FINES [-2]

ORIGIN QUALITY

Check ONE (Or 2 & average)

Check Two substrate TYPE BOXES;

estimate % or note every type present

HEAVY [-2]

MODERATE [-1]

NORMAL [0]

FREE [1]

EXTENSIVE [-2]

MODERATE [-1]

NORMAL [0]

NONE [1]

SILT

(Score natural substrates; ignore

4 or more [2] sludge from point-sources)

3 or less [0]

NUMBER OF BEST TYPES:

HARDPAN [4]

DETRITUS [3]

MUCK [2]

SILT [2]

ARTIFICIAL [0]

BLDR /SLABS [10]

BOULDER [9]

COBBLE [8]

GRAVEL [7]

SAND [6]

BEDROCK [5]

2] Indicate presence 0 to 3: 0-Absent; 1-Very small amounts or if more common of marginal

quality; 2-Moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest

quality; 3-Highest quality in moderate or greater amounts (e.g., very large boulders in deep or fast water, large

diameter log that is stable, well developed rootwad in deep / fast water, or deep, well-defined, functional pools.

UNDERCUT BANKS [1]

OVERHANGING VEGETATION [1]

SHALLOWS (IN SLOW WATER) [1]

ROOTMATS [1]

POOLS > 70cm [2]

ROOTWADS [1]

BOULDERS [1]

OXBOWS, BACKWATERS [1]

AQUATIC MACROPHYTES [1]

LOGS OR WOODY DEBRIS [1]

EXTENSIVE >75% [11]

MODERATE 25-75% [7]

SPARSE 5-<25% [3]

NEARLY ABSENT <5% [1]

AMOUNT

Check ONE (Or 2 & average)

3] Check ONE in each category (Or 2 & average)

SINUOSITY

HIGH [4]

MODERATE [3]

LOW [2]

NONE [1]

DEVELOPMENT

EXCELLENT [7]

GOOD [5]

FAIR [3]

POOR [1]

CHANNELIZATION

NONE [6]

RECOVERED [4]

RECOVERING [3]

RECENT OR NO RECOVERY [1]

STABILITY

HIGH [3]

MODERATE [2]

LOW [1]

4] Check ONE in each category for (Or 2 per bank & average)

River right looking downstream

EROSION

NONE / LITTLE [3]

MODERATE [2]

HEAVY / SEVERE [1]

L R

POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [2]

POOL WIDTH = RIFFLE WIDTH [1]

POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [0]

Check ONE (ONLY!)

Indicate for reach - pools and riffles.

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOOD PLAIN QUALITY L R

FOREST, SWAMP [3]

SHRUB OR OLD FIELD [2]

RESIDENTIAL, PARK, NEW FIELD [1]

FENCED PASTURE [1]

OPEN PASTURE, ROWCROP [0]

L R

CONSERVATION TILLAGE [1]

URBAN OR INDUSTRIAL [0]

MINING / CONSTRUCTION [0]

L R

Indicate predominant land use(s)

past 100m riparian.

WIDE > 50m [4]

MODERATE 10-50m [3]

NARROW 5-10m [2]

VERY NARROW < 5m [1]

NONE [0]

5]

MAXIMUM DEPTH

> 1m [6]

0.7-<1m [4]

0.4-<0.7m [2]

0.2-<0.4m [1]

< 0.2m [0]

CHANNEL WIDTH CURRENT VELOCITY

SLOW [1]

INTERSTITIAL [-1]

INTERMITTENT [-2]

EDDIES [1]

Check ONE (Or 2 & average) Check ALL that apply

TORRENTIAL [-1]

VERY FAST [1]

FAST [1]

MODERATE [1]

Indicate for functional riffles; Best areas must be large enough to support a population

of riffle-obligate species: Check ONE (Or 2 & average).

RIFFLE DEPTH

BEST AREAS > 10cm [2]

BEST AREAS 5-10cm [1]

BEST AREAS < 5cm

RUN DEPTH

MAXIMUM > 50cm [2]

MAXIMUM < 50cm [1]

RIFFLE / RUN SUBSTRATE RIFFLE / RUN EMBEDDEDNESS

STABLE (e.g., Cobble, Boulder) [2]

MOD. STABLE (e.g., Large Gravel) [1]

UNSTABLE (e.g., Fine Gravel, Sand) [0]

NONE [2]

LOW [1]

MODERATE [0]

EXTENSIVE [-1] [metric=0]

NO RIFFLE [metric=0]

6] ( ft/mi)

DRAINAGE AREA

( mi2)

%POOL:

%RUN:

%GLIDE:

%RIFFLE:

VERY LOW - LOW [2-4]

MODERATE [ ]

HIGH - VERY HIGH [ ]

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

1

2

5.0

50

10

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

13.0

70.0

39.73121, -80.86357
Comment RE: Reach consistency/ Is reach typical of steam?, Recreation/ Observed - Inferred, Other/ Sampling observations, Concerns, Access directions, etc. AREA DEPTH >100ft2 >3ft METHOD BOAT WADE L. LINE OTHER DISTANCE 0.5 Km 0.2 Km 0.15 Km 0.12 Km OTHER meters CANOPY > 85%- OPEN 55%-<85% 30%-<55% 10%-<30% <10%- CLOSED Check ALL that apply CLARITY < 20 cm 20-<40 cm 40-70 cm > 70 cm/ CTB SECCHI DEPTHcm 1st --sample pass-- 2nd STAGE HIGH UPNORMAL LOW DRY 1st -sample pass- 2ndcm 1stpass 2nd NUISANCE ALGAE INVASIVE MACROPHYTES EXCESS TURBIDITY DISCOLORATION FOAM / SCUM OIL SHEEN TRASH / LITTER NUISANCE ODOR SLUDGE DEPOSITS CSOs/SSOs/OUTFALLS PUBLIC / PRIVATE / BOTH / NA ACTIVE / HISTORIC / BOTH / NA YOUNG-SUCCESSION-OLD SPRAY / SNAG / REMOVED MODIFIED / DIPPED OUT / NA LEVEED / ONE SIDED RELOCATED / CUTOFFS MOVING-BEDLOAD-STABLE ARMOURED / SLUMPS ISLANDS / SCOURED IMPOUNDED / DESICCATED FLOOD CONTROL / DRAINAGE Circle some & COMMENT WWTP / CSO / NPDES / INDUSTRY HARDENED / URBAN / DIRT&GRIME CONTAMINATED / LANDFILL BMPs-CONSTRUCTION-SEDIMENT LOGGING / IRRIGATION / COOLING BANK / EROSION / SURFACE FALSE BANK / MANURE / LAGOON WASH H20 / TILE / H20 TABLE ACID / MINE / QUARRY / FLOW NATURAL / WETLAND / STAGNANT PARK / GOLF / LAWN / HOME ATMOSPHERE / DATA PAUCITY x width x depth max. depth x bankfull width bankfull x depth W/D ratio bankfull max. depth floodprone x2 width entrench. ratio 5' 20 1.17'
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

0.52

24 39.73119 -80.86390

0.30 m 0.30

30.00%
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Gilmore Run 13.00

New Martinsville

Salem

0.44

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
41

SW

42

West

43

ENE

44

NE

S-WJKM11
52

51

50 49

46

47

45

48

44

43

42

41

37

40

39 38

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

0.52

127 39.73116 -80.86380

30.00%

1

2
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Gilmore Run 0.00

New Martinsville

Salem

0.44

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
45

North

46

WSW

47

North

48

NE

S-WJKM12
52

51

50 49

46

47

45

48

44

43

42

41

37

40

39 38

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

< 0.01

385 39.73048 -80.86355

2.5

0.46 m 0.46

100%
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Gilmore Run 57.00

New Martinsville

Salem

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
49

East

50

West

51

SW

52

S-WJKM13
52

51

50 49

46

47

45

48

44

43

42

41

37

40

39 38

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

0.05

92 39.72774 -80.86592

20%

45%

2.5

100%
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Oppossum Creek 749.00

New Martinsville

Salem

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
53

SW

54

SW

55

North

56

SW

S-WJKM14
56

55

54

53

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-WJKM15 Ohio 0.06

256 39.72675 -80.86547

11/08/19 KMM, WJ

25%

15%

25%

10%

1 %

7

10

2.13

25

45.00%

32

100%

15

20

67

S-WJKM15 Modified Class 2
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Oppossum Creek 292.00

New Martinsville

Monroe Salem

11/07/19 0.03

See Attached Figure 4 and Data Form Photographs.

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

ft.
57

SE

58

SE

59

NW

60

SE

S-WJKM15 11/08/19
W-WJKM03

843 SqFt

W-WJKM03, W-WJKM04-UPL

9

60

59

58

57

12 11

10

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index

and Use Assessment Field Sheet

_ _ _._ _ _/ _ _/ 06

_ _ _- _ _ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Maximum

20

Maximum

20

Maximum

20

Maximum

10

Maximum

12

EPA 4520 06/16/06

Maximum

8

Maximum

10

(NAD 83 - decimal o) _ _ . _ _ _ _ /8_ . _ _ _ _

Recreation Potential

(circle one and comment on back)

1]

BEST TYPES POOL RIFFLE OTHER TYPES POOL RIFFLE

LIMESTONE [1]

TILLS [1]

WETLANDS [0]

HARDPAN [0]

SANDSTONE [0]

RIP/RAP [0]

LACUSTURINE [0]

SHALE [-1]

COAL FINES [-2]

ORIGIN QUALITY

Check ONE (Or 2 & average)

Check Two substrate TYPE BOXES;

estimate % or note every type present

HEAVY [-2]

MODERATE [-1]

NORMAL [0]

FREE [1]

EXTENSIVE [-2]

MODERATE [-1]

NORMAL [0]

NONE [1]

SILT

(Score natural substrates; ignore

4 or more [2] sludge from point-sources)

3 or less [0]

NUMBER OF BEST TYPES:

HARDPAN [4]

DETRITUS [3]

MUCK [2]

SILT [2]

ARTIFICIAL [0]

BLDR /SLABS [10]

BOULDER [9]

COBBLE [8]

GRAVEL [7]

SAND [6]

BEDROCK [5]

2] Indicate presence 0 to 3: 0-Absent; 1-Very small amounts or if more common of marginal

quality; 2-Moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest

quality; 3-Highest quality in moderate or greater amounts (e.g., very large boulders in deep or fast water, large

diameter log that is stable, well developed rootwad in deep / fast water, or deep, well-defined, functional pools.

UNDERCUT BANKS [1]

OVERHANGING VEGETATION [1]

SHALLOWS (IN SLOW WATER) [1]

ROOTMATS [1]

POOLS > 70cm [2]

ROOTWADS [1]

BOULDERS [1]

OXBOWS, BACKWATERS [1]

AQUATIC MACROPHYTES [1]

LOGS OR WOODY DEBRIS [1]

EXTENSIVE >75% [11]

MODERATE 25-75% [7]

SPARSE 5-<25% [3]

NEARLY ABSENT <5% [1]

AMOUNT

Check ONE (Or 2 & average)

3] Check ONE in each category (Or 2 & average)

SINUOSITY

HIGH [4]

MODERATE [3]

LOW [2]

NONE [1]

DEVELOPMENT

EXCELLENT [7]

GOOD [5]

FAIR [3]

POOR [1]

CHANNELIZATION

NONE [6]

RECOVERED [4]

RECOVERING [3]

RECENT OR NO RECOVERY [1]

STABILITY

HIGH [3]

MODERATE [2]

LOW [1]

4] Check ONE in each category for (Or 2 per bank & average)

River right looking downstream

EROSION

NONE / LITTLE [3]

MODERATE [2]

HEAVY / SEVERE [1]

L R

POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [2]

POOL WIDTH = RIFFLE WIDTH [1]

POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [0]

Check ONE (ONLY!)

Indicate for reach - pools and riffles.

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOOD PLAIN QUALITY L R

FOREST, SWAMP [3]

SHRUB OR OLD FIELD [2]

RESIDENTIAL, PARK, NEW FIELD [1]

FENCED PASTURE [1]

OPEN PASTURE, ROWCROP [0]

L R

CONSERVATION TILLAGE [1]

URBAN OR INDUSTRIAL [0]

MINING / CONSTRUCTION [0]

L R

Indicate predominant land use(s)

past 100m riparian.

WIDE > 50m [4]

MODERATE 10-50m [3]

NARROW 5-10m [2]

VERY NARROW < 5m [1]

NONE [0]

5]

MAXIMUM DEPTH

> 1m [6]

0.7-<1m [4]

0.4-<0.7m [2]

0.2-<0.4m [1]

< 0.2m [0]

CHANNEL WIDTH CURRENT VELOCITY

SLOW [1]

INTERSTITIAL [-1]

INTERMITTENT [-2]

EDDIES [1]

Check ONE (Or 2 & average) Check ALL that apply

TORRENTIAL [-1]

VERY FAST [1]

FAST [1]

MODERATE [1]

Indicate for functional riffles; Best areas must be large enough to support a population

of riffle-obligate species: Check ONE (Or 2 & average).

RIFFLE DEPTH

BEST AREAS > 10cm [2]

BEST AREAS 5-10cm [1]

BEST AREAS < 5cm

RUN DEPTH

MAXIMUM > 50cm [2]

MAXIMUM < 50cm [1]

RIFFLE / RUN SUBSTRATE RIFFLE / RUN EMBEDDEDNESS

STABLE (e.g., Cobble, Boulder) [2]

MOD. STABLE (e.g., Large Gravel) [1]

UNSTABLE (e.g., Fine Gravel, Sand) [0]

NONE [2]

LOW [1]

MODERATE [0]

EXTENSIVE [-1] [metric=0]

NO RIFFLE [metric=0]

6] ( ft/mi)

DRAINAGE AREA

( mi2)

%POOL:

%RUN:

%GLIDE:

%RIFFLE:

VERY LOW - LOW [2-4]

MODERATE [ 6]

HIGH - VERY HIGH [ 10]

0%

0%

0%

4.0

39.725484, -80.865065

0%

0%

0%

48.0
Comment RE: Reach consistency/ Is reach typical of steam?, Recreation/ Observed - Inferred, Other/ Sampling observations, Concerns, Access directions, etc. AREA DEPTH >100ft2 >3ft METHOD BOAT WADE L. LINE OTHER DISTANCE 0.5 Km 0.2 Km 0.15 Km 0.12 Km OTHER meters CANOPY > 85%- OPEN 55%-<85% 30%-<55% 10%-<30% <10%- CLOSED Check ALL that apply CLARITY < 20 cm 20-<40 cm 40-70 cm > 70 cm/ CTB SECCHI DEPTHcm 1st --sample pass-- 2nd STAGE HIGH UPNORMAL LOW DRY 1st -sample pass- 2ndcm 1stpass 2nd NUISANCE ALGAE INVASIVE MACROPHYTES EXCESS TURBIDITY DISCOLORATION FOAM / SCUM OIL SHEEN TRASH / LITTER NUISANCE ODOR SLUDGE DEPOSITS CSOs/SSOs/OUTFALLS PUBLIC / PRIVATE / BOTH / NA ACTIVE / HISTORIC / BOTH / NA YOUNG-SUCCESSION-OLD SPRAY / SNAG / REMOVED MODIFIED / DIPPED OUT / NA LEVEED / ONE SIDED RELOCATED / CUTOFFS MOVING-BEDLOAD-STABLE ARMOURED / SLUMPS ISLANDS / SCOURED IMPOUNDED / DESICCATED FLOOD CONTROL / DRAINAGE Circle some & COMMENT WWTP / CSO / NPDES / INDUSTRY HARDENED / URBAN / DIRT&GRIME CONTAMINATED / LANDFILL BMPs-CONSTRUCTION-SEDIMENT LOGGING / IRRIGATION / COOLING BANK / EROSION / SURFACE FALSE BANK / MANURE / LAGOON WASH H20 / TILE / H20 TABLE ACID / MINE / QUARRY / FLOW NATURAL / WETLAND / STAGNANT PARK / GOLF / LAWN / HOME ATMOSPHERE / DATA PAUCITY x width x depth max. depth x bankfull width bankfull x depth W/D ratio bankfull max. depth floodprone x2 width entrench. ratio75 ft. 11 ft. >6 ft. 65 ft. 8 ft.
61

SW

62

NE

63

NNE

64

NNW

S-WJKM16
W-WJKM04a

238 SqFt

W-WJKM04b

2,672 SqFt

63

64

62

61

20

19 18

17

16

15

14

13

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP01 0.50

735 39.71912 -80.86041

11/11/19 JMM, KMP

45%

25%

15%

15%

0%

0%

0%

4

3

1.50

stream flow goes subsurface in disturbed ROW area; re-emerges downstream

28

70.00%

32

100%

20

57

S-KP01 Modified Class 2
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Opossum Creek 0.50

New Martinsville

Salem

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

mi.
69 70

71 72

S-KP01 11/11/19
W-KP01-UPL

W-KP01-PFO

3,069 SqFt

W-KP01-PEM

40,422 SqFt

72

71

36

35

34

33

40

39

38 37

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
W-KP01-PEM

40,422 SqFt

72

70

69

35

34

33

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP02 0.10

114 39.72270 -80.86210

11/11/19 JMM, KMP

0%

0%

35%

25%

20%

0%

20%

4

Max depth = 2.54cm 2.54

0.15

within old pipeline right-of-way

15

0.00%

19

100%

5

29

S-KP02 Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Opossum Creek 0.30

New Martinsville

Salem

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N

mi.
73 74

75 76

S-KP02 11/11/19
W-WJKM06-UPL

W-WJKM06

662 SqFt

W-KP03

5,236 SqFt

W-KP04

1,534 SqFt

W-KP03, W-KP04-UPL

80

79

78

77

76

75

74

73

32

31

30

29

52

51

50

49

48

47

46

45

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP03 0.70

249 39.72312 -80.86205

11/11/19 JMM, KMP artificial substrate made out of mesh fabric material

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

1

8

1.50

6

0.00%

7

0%

15

20

42

S-KP03 Modified Class 2
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Opossum Creek

New Martinsville

Salem

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
77 78

79 80

S-KP03 11/11/19
W-WJKM06-UPL

W-WJKM06

662 SqFt

W-KP03

5,236 SqFt

W-KP04

1,534 SqFt

W-KP03, W-KP04-UPL

80

79

78

77

76

75

74

73

32

31

30

29

52

51

50

49

48

47

46

45

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP04 0.22

238 39.70395 -80.85601

11/11/19 JMM, KMP

0%

10%

30%

20%

15%

0%

25%

5

Max depth = 2.54cm 2.54

0.15

within old pipeline right-of-way

9

10.00%

14

100%

5

24

S-KP04 Modified Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Muhleman Run 0.78

New Martinsville

Ohio

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
81 82

83 84

S-KP04 11/11/19
W-KP05

719 SqFt

W-KP06

4,311 SqFt

W-KP05, W-KP06-UPL

88

87

86

85

84

83

82

81

60

59

58

57

56

55

54

53

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP05 1.00

275 39.70436 -80.85539

11/11/19 JMM, KMP

20%

40%

30%

10%

0%

0%

0%

4

22

1.80

within old pipeline right-of-way

21

60.00%

25

100%

25

20

70

S-KP05 Modified Class 2
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Muhleman Run 0.43

New Martinsville

Ohio

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N 10%

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
85 86

87 88

S-KP05 11/11/19
W-KP05

719 SqFt

W-KP06

4,311 SqFt

W-KP05, W-KP06-UPL

88

87

86

85

84

83

82

81

60

59

58

57

56

55

54

53

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index

and Use Assessment Field Sheet

_ _ _._ _ _/ _ _/ 06

_ _ _- _ _ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Maximum

20

Maximum

20

Maximum

20

Maximum

10

Maximum

12

EPA 4520 06/16/06

Maximum

8

Maximum

10

(NAD 83 - decimal o) _ _ . _ _ _ _ /8_ . _ _ _ _

Recreation Potential

(circle one and comment on back)

1]

BEST TYPES POOL RIFFLE OTHER TYPES POOL RIFFLE

LIMESTONE [1]

TILLS [1]

WETLANDS [0]

HARDPAN [0]

SANDSTONE [0]

RIP/RAP [0]

LACUSTURINE [0]

SHALE [-1]

COAL FINES [-2]

ORIGIN QUALITY

Check ONE (Or 2 & average)

Check Two substrate TYPE BOXES;

estimate % or note every type present

HEAVY [-2]

MODERATE [-1]

NORMAL [0]

FREE [1]

EXTENSIVE [-2]

MODERATE [-1]

NORMAL [0]

NONE [1]

SILT

(Score natural substrates; ignore

4 or more [2] sludge from point-sources)

3 or less [0]

NUMBER OF BEST TYPES:

HARDPAN [4]

DETRITUS [3]

MUCK [2]

SILT [2]

ARTIFICIAL [0]

BLDR /SLABS [10]

BOULDER [9]

COBBLE [8]

GRAVEL [7]

SAND [6]

BEDROCK [5]

2] Indicate presence 0 to 3: 0-Absent; 1-Very small amounts or if more common of marginal

quality; 2-Moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest

quality; 3-Highest quality in moderate or greater amounts (e.g., very large boulders in deep or fast water, large

diameter log that is stable, well developed rootwad in deep / fast water, or deep, well-defined, functional pools.

UNDERCUT BANKS [1]

OVERHANGING VEGETATION [1]

SHALLOWS (IN SLOW WATER) [1]

ROOTMATS [1]

POOLS > 70cm [2]

ROOTWADS [1]

BOULDERS [1]

OXBOWS, BACKWATERS [1]

AQUATIC MACROPHYTES [1]

LOGS OR WOODY DEBRIS [1]

EXTENSIVE >75% [11]

MODERATE 25-75% [7]

SPARSE 5-<25% [3]

NEARLY ABSENT <5% [1]

AMOUNT

Check ONE (Or 2 & average)

3] Check ONE in each category (Or 2 & average)

SINUOSITY

HIGH [4]

MODERATE [3]

LOW [2]

NONE [1]

DEVELOPMENT

EXCELLENT [7]

GOOD [5]

FAIR [3]

POOR [1]

CHANNELIZATION

NONE [6]

RECOVERED [4]

RECOVERING [3]

RECENT OR NO RECOVERY [1]

STABILITY

HIGH [3]

MODERATE [2]

LOW [1]

4] Check ONE in each category for (Or 2 per bank & average)

River right looking downstream

EROSION

NONE / LITTLE [3]

MODERATE [2]

HEAVY / SEVERE [1]

L R

POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [2]

POOL WIDTH = RIFFLE WIDTH [1]

POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [0]

Check ONE (ONLY!)

Indicate for reach - pools and riffles.

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOOD PLAIN QUALITY L R

FOREST, SWAMP [3]

SHRUB OR OLD FIELD [2]

RESIDENTIAL, PARK, NEW FIELD [1]

FENCED PASTURE [1]

OPEN PASTURE, ROWCROP [0]

L R

CONSERVATION TILLAGE [1]

URBAN OR INDUSTRIAL [0]

MINING / CONSTRUCTION [0]

L R

Indicate predominant land use(s)

past 100m riparian.

WIDE > 50m [4]

MODERATE 10-50m [3]

NARROW 5-10m [2]

VERY NARROW < 5m [1]

NONE [0]

5]

MAXIMUM DEPTH

> 1m [6]

0.7-<1m [4]

0.4-<0.7m [2]

0.2-<0.4m [1]

< 0.2m [0]

CHANNEL WIDTH CURRENT VELOCITY

SLOW [1]

INTERSTITIAL [-1]

INTERMITTENT [-2]

EDDIES [1]

Check ONE (Or 2 & average) Check ALL that apply

TORRENTIAL [-1]

VERY FAST [1]

FAST [1]

MODERATE [1]

Indicate for functional riffles; Best areas must be large enough to support a population

of riffle-obligate species: Check ONE (Or 2 & average).

RIFFLE DEPTH

BEST AREAS > 10cm [2]

BEST AREAS 5-10cm [1]

BEST AREAS < 5cm

RUN DEPTH

MAXIMUM > 50cm [2]

MAXIMUM < 50cm [1]

RIFFLE / RUN SUBSTRATE RIFFLE / RUN EMBEDDEDNESS

STABLE (e.g., Cobble, Boulder) [2]

MOD. STABLE (e.g., Large Gravel) [1]

UNSTABLE (e.g., Fine Gravel, Sand) [0]

NONE [2]

LOW [1]

MODERATE [0]

EXTENSIVE [-1] [metric=0]

NO RIFFLE [metric=0]

6] ( ft/mi)

DRAINAGE AREA

( mi2)

%POOL:

%RUN:

%GLIDE:

%RIFFLE:

VERY LOW - LOW [2-4]

MODERATE [6-10]

HIGH - VERY HIGH [10-6]

0% 0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%
Comment RE: Reach consistency/ Is reach typical of steam?, Recreation/ Observed - Inferred, Other/ Sampling observations, Concerns, Access directions, etc. AREA DEPTH >100ft2 >3ft METHOD BOAT WADE L. LINE OTHER DISTANCE 0.5 Km 0.2 Km 0.15 Km 0.12 Km OTHER meters CANOPY > 85%- OPEN 55%-<85% 30%-<55% 10%-<30% <10%- CLOSED Check ALL that apply CLARITY < 20 cm 20-<40 cm 40-70 cm > 70 cm/ CTB SECCHI DEPTHcm 1st --sample pass-- 2nd STAGE HIGH UPNORMAL LOW DRY 1st -sample pass- 2ndcm 1stpass 2nd NUISANCE ALGAE INVASIVE MACROPHYTES EXCESS TURBIDITY DISCOLORATION FOAM / SCUM OIL SHEEN TRASH / LITTER NUISANCE ODOR SLUDGE DEPOSITS CSOs/SSOs/OUTFALLS PUBLIC / PRIVATE / BOTH / NA ACTIVE / HISTORIC / BOTH / NA YOUNG-SUCCESSION-OLD SPRAY / SNAG / REMOVED MODIFIED / DIPPED OUT / NA LEVEED / ONE SIDED RELOCATED / CUTOFFS MOVING-BEDLOAD-STABLE ARMOURED / SLUMPS ISLANDS / SCOURED IMPOUNDED / DESICCATED FLOOD CONTROL / DRAINAGE Circle some & COMMENT WWTP / CSO / NPDES / INDUSTRY HARDENED / URBAN / DIRT&GRIME CONTAMINATED / LANDFILL BMPs-CONSTRUCTION-SEDIMENT LOGGING / IRRIGATION / COOLING BANK / EROSION / SURFACE FALSE BANK / MANURE / LAGOON WASH H20 / TILE / H20 TABLE ACID / MINE / QUARRY / FLOW NATURAL / WETLAND / STAGNANT PARK / GOLF / LAWN / HOME ATMOSPHERE / DATA PAUCITY x width x depth max. depth x bankfull width bankfull x depth W/D ratio bankfull max. depth floodprone x2 width entrench. ratio
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP06 0.50

372 39.70619 -80.85309

11/11/19 JMM, KMP

0%

0%

20%

30%

30%

0%

20%

4

3

0.30

pipeline ROW

9

0.00%

13

100%

5

23

S-KP06 Modified Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Muhleman Run 0.75

New Martinsville

Ohio

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N 10%

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
89 90

91 92

S-KP06 11/11/19
W-KP07

10,855 SqFt

W-KP07-UPL

90

89

64

63

62

61

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
92

91

90

89

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP08 0.20

350 39.70708 -80.85105

11/11/19 JMM, KMP

5%

15%

30%

15%

10%

0%

25%

6

3

0.61

pipeline ROW

9

20.00%

15

100%

5

25

S-KP08 Modified Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Muhleman Run

New Martinsville

Ohio

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
93 94

95 96

S-KP08 11/11/19
W-KP08

4,296 SqFt

W-KP09

906 SqFt

W-KP08, W-KP09-UPL

96

94 95

93

99

98

97

72

71

70

69

68

67 66

65

100

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP07 0.10

70 39.70702 -80.85162

11/11/19 JMM, KMP

0%

0%

20%

30%

30%

0%

20%

4

0

0.15

pipeline ROW

9

0.00%

13

100%

0

5

18

S-KP07 Modified Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Muhleman Run

New Martinsville

Ohio

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N 10%

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
97 98

99 100

S-KP07 11/11/19
W-KP08

4,296 SqFt

W-KP09

906 SqFt

W-KP08, W-KP09-UPL

96

94 95

93

99

98

97

72

71

70

69

68

67 66

65

100

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP10 0.07

126 39.70766 -80.85039

11/12/19 JMM, KMP

0%

10%

20%

30%

10%

0%

30%

5

3

0.30

old pipeline ROW

6

10.00%

11

100%

5

21

S-KP10 Modified Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Muhleman Run

New Martinsville

Ohio

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
101 102

103 104

S-KP10 11/12/19
W-KP11-UPL

W-KP11

6,278 SqFt

80

79 78

77

108

107

106

105

104

103

102

101

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP11 0.25

417 39.70760 -80.85021

11/12/19 JMM, KMP

0%

10%

20%

30%

10%

0%

30%

5

15

1.52

old pipeline ROW

6

10.00%

11

100%

25

20

56

S-KP11 Modified Class 2
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Muhleman Run

New Martinsville

Ohio

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N 30%

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
105 106

107 108

S-KP11 11/12/19
W-KP11-UPL

W-KP11

6,278 SqFt

80

79 78

77

108

107

106

105

104

103

102

101

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP13 0.04

56 39.70889 -80.84744

11/12/19 JMM, KMP

15%

30%

30%

25%

0%

0%

0%

4

0

0.30

21

45.00%

25

100%

0

5

30

S-KP13 Modified Class 1
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Muhleman Run

New Martinsville

Ohio

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N 10%

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
109 110

111 112

S-KP13 11/12/19
W-KP14-UPL

W-KP14

5,197 SqFt

92 91

90

89

112

111

109 110

116

115

114

113

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP12 0.25

470 39.70887 -80.84729

11/12/19 JMM, KMP

15%

30%

30%

15%

5%

0%

5%

6

8

0.91

21

45.00%

27

100%

15

5

47

S-KP12 Modified Class 2
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Muhleman Run

New Martinsville

Ohio

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N 10%

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
113 114

115 116

S-KP12 11/12/19
W-KP14-UPL

W-KP14

5,197 SqFt

92 91

90

89

112

111

109 110

116

115

114

113

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form

HHEI Score (sum of m etrics 1, 2, 3) :

SITE NAME/LOCATION _________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________SITE NUMBER______________ RIVER BASIN _______________________ DRAINAGE AREA (mi2

) __________

LENGTH OF STREAM REACH (ft) ___________ LAT. ____________ LONG. ___________ RIVER CODE _________ RIVER MILE _________

DATE ______________ SCORER _________________ COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________

NOTE: Complete All Items On This Form - Refer to “Field Evaluation Manual for Ohio’s PHWH Streams” for Instructions

STREAM CHANNEL

 MODIFICATIONS:

NONE / NATURAL CHANNEL RECOVERED RECOVERING RECENT OR NO RECOVERY

1. SUBSTRATE (Estimate percent of every type of substrate present. Check ONLY two predominant substrate TYPE boxes

(Max of 32). Add total number of significant substrate types found (Max of 8). Final metric score is sum of boxes A & B.

TYPE PERCENT TYPE PERCENT

BLDR SLABS [16 pts] ________ SILT [3 pt] ________

BOULDER (>256 mm) [16 pts] ________ LEAF PACK/WOODY DEBRIS [3 pts] ________

BEDROCK [16 pt] ________ FINE DETRITUS [3 pts] ________

COBBLE (65-256 mm) [12 pts] ________ CLAY or HARDPAN [0 pt] ________

GRAVEL (2-64 mm) [9 pts] ________ MUCK [0 pts] ________

SAND (<2 mm) [6 pts] ________ ARTIFICIAL [3 pts] ________

 Total of Percentages of (A) (B)

 Bldr Slabs, Boulder, Cobble, Bedrock ________

SCORE OF TWO MOST PREDOMINATE SUBSTRATE TYPES: TOTAL NUMBER OF SUBSTRATE TYPES:

HHEI

Metric

Points

Substrate

Max = 40

2. Maximum Pool Depth (Measure the maximum pool depth within the 61 meter (200 ft) evaluation reach at the time of

evaluation. Avoid plunge pools from road culverts or storm water pipes) (Check ONLY one box):

> 30 centimeters [20 pts] > 5 cm - 10 cm [15 pts]

> 22.5 - 30 cm [30 pts] < 5 cm [5 pts]

> 10 - 22.5 cm [25 pts] NO WATER OR MOIST CHANNEL [0 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH (centimeters):

Pool Depth

Max = 30

3. BANK FULL WIDTH (Measured as the average of 3-4 measurements) (Check ONLY one box):

> 4.0 meters (> 13') [30 pts] > 1.0 m - 1.5 m (> 3' 3" - 4' 8") [15 pts]

> 3.0 m - 4.0 m (> 9' 7" - 13') [25 pts] 1.0 m (<=3' 3") [5 pts]

> 1.5 m - 3.0 m (> 9' 7" - 4' 8") [20 pts]

COMMENTS_________________________________________________ AVERAGE BANKFULL WIDTH (meters):

 Bankfull

 Width 

 Max=30

This information must also be completed

RIPARIAN ZONE AND FLOODPLAIN QUALITY NOTE: River Left (L) and Right (R) as looking downstream

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOODPLAIN QUALITY

 L R (Per Bank) L R (Most Predominant per Bank) L R

Wide >10m Mature Forest, Wetland Conservation Tillage 

Moderate 5-10m Immature Forest, Shrub or Old

Field Urban or Industrial 

Narrow <5m Residential, Park, New Field Open Pasture, Row Crop

None Fenced Pasture Mining or Construction

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

FLOW REGIME (At Time of Evaluation) (Check ONLY one box):

Stream Flowing Moist Channel, isolated pools, no flow (Intermittent)

Subsurface flow with isolated pools (Interstitial) Dry channel, no water (Ephemeral)

COMMENTS______________________________________________________________________________________

SINUOSITY (Number of bends per 61 m (200 ft) of channel) (Check ONLY one box):

None 1.0 2.0 3.0

0.5 1.5 2.5 >3

STREAM GRADIENT ESTIMATE

 Flat (0.5 ft/100 ft) Flat to Moderate Moderate (2 ft/100 ft) Moderate to Severe Severe (10 ft/100 ft)

October 24, 2002 Revision PHWH Form Page - 1

A + B

*Modified if Checked*

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

S-KP14 0.08

150 39.70878 -80.84670

11/12/19 JMM, KMP

5%

15%

35%

20%

15%

0%

10%

6

3

0.30

15

20.00%

21

100%

5

31

S-KP14 Modified Class 2
ADDITIONAL STREAM INFORMATION (This Information Must Also be Completed):

QHEI PERFORMED? - Yes No QHEI Score __________ (If Yes, Attach Completed QHEI Form)

DOWNSTREAM DESIGNATED USE(S)

 WWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 CWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

 EWH Name: ___________________________________________________________ Distance from Evaluated Stream _____________

MAPPING: ATTACH COPIES OF MAPS, INCLUDING THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AREA. CLEARLY MARK THE SITE LOCATION

USGS Quadrangle Name:___________________________________ NRCS Soil Map Page:_______ NRCS Soil Map Stream Order ______

County: ___________________________________________ Township / City:__________________________________________________

MISCELLANEOUS

Base Flow Conditions? (Y/N):_______ Date of last precipitation:____________________ Quantity:_____________

Photograph Information: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Elevated Turbidity? (Y/N): _________ Canopy (% open): ____________ 

Were samples collected for water chemistry? (Y/N): _______ (Note lab sample no. or id. and attach results) Lab Number:__________________

Field Measures: Temp (°C)_______ Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) _________ pH (S.U.) ________ Conductivity (μmhos/cm) ________________

Is the sampling reach representative of the stream (Y/N)_____ If not, please explain:______________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional comments/description of pollution impacts:________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIOTIC EVALUATION

Performed? (Y/N): ________ (If Yes, Record all observations. Voucher collections optional. NO TE: all voucher samples must be labeled with the site

ID number. Include appropriate field data sheets from the Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment Manual)

Fish Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ Salamanders Observed? (Y/N)_____ Voucher? (Y/N)_____ 

Frogs or Tadpoles Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Observed? (Y/N)____ Voucher? (Y/N)____ 

Comments Regarding Biology: _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DRAWING AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF STREAM REACH (This must be completed):

Include important landmarks and other features of interest for site evaluation and a narrative description of the stream’s location

FLOW 

PHWH Form Page - 2

October 24, 2002 Revision

Muhleman Run

Ohio

11/08/19 0.70

See Attached Stream Photograph Page

N

N

N

N N N N

N N N

N
117 118

119 120

S-KP14 11/12/19
W-KP15-UPL

W-KP15

1,054 SqFt

W-KP16

4,621 SqFt

W-KP16-UPL

99

98

97

96

95

94

93

120

119

118

117

100

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index

and Use Assessment Field Sheet

_ _ _._ _ _/ _ _/ 06

_ _ _- _ _ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Maximum

20

Maximum

20

Maximum

20

Maximum

10

Maximum

12

EPA 4520 06/16/06

Maximum

8

Maximum

10

(NAD 83 - decimal o) _ _ . _ _ _ _ /8_ . _ _ _ _

Recreation Potential

(circle one and comment on back)

1]

BEST TYPES POOL RIFFLE OTHER TYPES POOL RIFFLE

LIMESTONE [1]

TILLS [1]

WETLANDS [0]

HARDPAN [0]

SANDSTONE [0]

RIP/RAP [0]

LACUSTURINE [0]

SHALE [-1]

COAL FINES [-2]

ORIGIN QUALITY

Check ONE (Or 2 & average)

Check Two substrate TYPE BOXES;

estimate % or note every type present

HEAVY [-2]

MODERATE [-1]

NORMAL [0]

FREE [1]

EXTENSIVE [-2]

MODERATE [-1]

NORMAL [0]

NONE [1]

SILT

(Score natural substrates; ignore

4 or more [2] sludge from point-sources)

3 or less [0]

NUMBER OF BEST TYPES:

HARDPAN [4]

DETRITUS [3]

MUCK [2]

SILT [2]

ARTIFICIAL [0]

BLDR /SLABS [10]

BOULDER [9]

COBBLE [8]

GRAVEL [7]

SAND [6]

BEDROCK [5]

2] Indicate presence 0 to 3: 0-Absent; 1-Very small amounts or if more common of marginal

quality; 2-Moderate amounts, but not of highest quality or in small amounts of highest

quality; 3-Highest quality in moderate or greater amounts (e.g., very large boulders in deep or fast water, large

diameter log that is stable, well developed rootwad in deep / fast water, or deep, well-defined, functional pools.

UNDERCUT BANKS [1]

OVERHANGING VEGETATION [1]

SHALLOWS (IN SLOW WATER) [1]

ROOTMATS [1]

POOLS > 70cm [2]

ROOTWADS [1]

BOULDERS [1]

OXBOWS, BACKWATERS [1]

AQUATIC MACROPHYTES [1]

LOGS OR WOODY DEBRIS [1]

EXTENSIVE >75% [11]

MODERATE 25-75% [7]

SPARSE 5-<25% [3]

NEARLY ABSENT <5% [1]

AMOUNT

Check ONE (Or 2 & average)

3] Check ONE in each category (Or 2 & average)

SINUOSITY

HIGH [4]

MODERATE [3]

LOW [2]

NONE [1]

DEVELOPMENT

EXCELLENT [7]

GOOD [5]

FAIR [3]

POOR [1]

CHANNELIZATION

NONE [6]

RECOVERED [4]

RECOVERING [3]

RECENT OR NO RECOVERY [1]

STABILITY

HIGH [3]

MODERATE [2]

LOW [1]

4] Check ONE in each category for (Or 2 per bank & average)

River right looking downstream

EROSION

NONE / LITTLE [3]

MODERATE [2]

HEAVY / SEVERE [1]

L R

POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [2]

POOL WIDTH = RIFFLE WIDTH [1]

POOL WIDTH > RIFFLE WIDTH [0]

Check ONE (ONLY!)

Indicate for reach - pools and riffles.

RIPARIAN WIDTH FLOOD PLAIN QUALITY L R

FOREST, SWAMP [3]

SHRUB OR OLD FIELD [2]

RESIDENTIAL, PARK, NEW FIELD [1]

FENCED PASTURE [1]

OPEN PASTURE, ROWCROP [0]

L R

CONSERVATION TILLAGE [1]

URBAN OR INDUSTRIAL [0]

MINING / CONSTRUCTION [0]

L R

Indicate predominant land use(s)

past 100m riparian.

WIDE > 50m [4]

MODERATE 10-50m [3]

NARROW 5-10m [2]

VERY NARROW < 5m [1]

NONE [0]

5]

MAXIMUM DEPTH

> 1m [6]

0.7-<1m [4]

0.4-<0.7m [2]

0.2-<0.4m [1]

< 0.2m [0]

CHANNEL WIDTH CURRENT VELOCITY

SLOW [1]

INTERSTITIAL [-1]

INTERMITTENT [-2]

EDDIES [1]

Check ONE (Or 2 & average) Check ALL that apply

TORRENTIAL [-1]

VERY FAST [1]

FAST [1]

MODERATE [1]

Indicate for functional riffles; Best areas must be large enough to support a population

of riffle-obligate species: Check ONE (Or 2 & average).

RIFFLE DEPTH

BEST AREAS > 10cm [2]

BEST AREAS 5-10cm [1]

BEST AREAS < 5cm

RUN DEPTH

MAXIMUM > 50cm [2]

MAXIMUM < 50cm [1]

RIFFLE / RUN SUBSTRATE RIFFLE / RUN EMBEDDEDNESS

STABLE (e.g., Cobble, Boulder) [2]

MOD. STABLE (e.g., Large Gravel) [1]

UNSTABLE (e.g., Fine Gravel, Sand) [0]

NONE [2]

LOW [1]

MODERATE [0]

EXTENSIVE [-1] [metric=0]

NO RIFFLE [metric=0]

6] ( ft/mi)

DRAINAGE AREA

( mi2)

%POOL:

%RUN:

%GLIDE:

%RIFFLE:

VERY LOW - LOW [2-4]

MODERATE [6-10]

HIGH - VERY HIGH [10-6]

Ohio River, Monroe County, Ohio (S-JM01)

Jason McGuirk; Tetra Tech

0% 20%

0%

10%

0%

0%

30% 25%

10% 0%

0%

0 3 1

2 0 0

0 0 1

0

9.0

1.0

100%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

9.0

17.0

14.0

9.0

10.0

11/12/2019

69.0
Comment RE: Reach consistency/ Is reach typical of steam?, Recreation/ Observed - Inferred, Other/ Sampling observations, Concerns, Access directions, etc. AREA DEPTH >100ft2 >3ft METHOD BOAT WADE L. LINE OTHER DISTANCE 0.5 Km 0.2 Km 0.15 Km 0.12 Km OTHER meters CANOPY > 85%- OPEN 55%-<85% 30%-<55% 10%-<30% <10%- CLOSED Check ALL that apply CLARITY < 20 cm 20-<40 cm 40-70 cm > 70 cm/ CTB SECCHI DEPTHcm 1st --sample pass-- 2nd STAGE HIGH UPNORMAL LOW DRY 1st -sample pass- 2ndcm 1stpass 2nd NUISANCE ALGAE INVASIVE MACROPHYTES EXCESS TURBIDITY DISCOLORATION FOAM / SCUM OIL SHEEN TRASH / LITTER NUISANCE ODOR SLUDGE DEPOSITS CSOs/SSOs/OUTFALLS PUBLIC / PRIVATE / BOTH / NA ACTIVE / HISTORIC / BOTH / NA YOUNG-SUCCESSION-OLD SPRAY / SNAG / REMOVED MODIFIED / DIPPED OUT / NA LEVEED / ONE SIDED RELOCATED / CUTOFFS MOVING-BEDLOAD-STABLE ARMOURED / SLUMPS ISLANDS / SCOURED IMPOUNDED / DESICCATED FLOOD CONTROL / DRAINAGE Circle some & COMMENT WWTP / CSO / NPDES / INDUSTRY HARDENED / URBAN / DIRT&GRIME CONTAMINATED / LANDFILL BMPs-CONSTRUCTION-SEDIMENT LOGGING / IRRIGATION / COOLING BANK / EROSION / SURFACE FALSE BANK / MANURE / LAGOON WASH H20 / TILE / H20 TABLE ACID / MINE / QUARRY / FLOW NATURAL / WETLAND / STAGNANT PARK / GOLF / LAWN / HOME ATMOSPHERE / DATA PAUCITY x width x depth max. depth x bankfull width bankfull x depth W/D ratio bankfull max. depth floodprone x2 width entrench. ratio
Photograph Number _______

Photograph Direction ______

Comments

 ID ________ Date ________

Photograph Number _______

Photograph Direction ______

Comments

Photograph Number _______

Photograph Direction ______

Comments

Photograph Number _______

Photograph Direction ______

Comments

121

NE

122

East

123

SE

124

East

S-JM01 11/12/2019
124

123

122

121

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
APPENDIX B: USACE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH

N/A

1-3

39.745837 -80.871736

Guernsey-Upshur complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes, moderately eroded

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

Heavy compacted clay layer restricting infiltration. pooling of water on the surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

Compacted Clay

4"

C
1 2

East

3

South

4

SE
W-WJKM01

133 SqFt

W-WJKM01-UPL

2

4

3

1

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH

N/A

1-3

39.745872 -80.871807

Guernsey-Upshur complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes, moderately eroded

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH W-WJKM02

N/A

2-4

39.742912 -80.870516

Gilpin-Upshur silt loams, 35 to 70 percent slopes

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

3

0

Floodplain Linear

Riverine RPWWD
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-WJKM02

Sambucus nigra 5

5

2.5 1

25

Impatiens capensis 5

Hydrophyllum virginianum 25

Boehmeria cylindrica 15

70

35 14

4

4

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

FACW

FACW

FAC

FACW
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-WJKM02

0-8 10YR 6/1

Large cobble

8"

8+ Refusal
5

West

W-WJKM02

6

SE

7 8

SE
W-WJKM02

W-WJKM02-UPL 504 SqFt

8

6

7 5

32

31

30

29

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH W-WJKM02-UPL

N/A

2-4

39.742444 -80.870907

Gilpin-Upshur silt loams, 35 to 70 percent slopes

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

Floodplain
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-WJKM02-UPL

Fagus grandifolia 20

Acer saccharum 15

35

17.5 7

Fagus grandifolia 5

5

2.5 1

Polystichum acrostichoides 15

15

7.5 3

4

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

FACU

FACU

FACU

FACU
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-WJKM02-UPL

10YR 4/4
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH

N/A

39.726499 -80.865057

Guernsey-Upshur complex, 18 to 70 percent slopes, landslip

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
9

NW

10

SE

11

ESE

12

North
W-WJKM03

843 SqFt

W-WJKM03, W-WJKM04-UPL

9

60

59

58

57

12 11

10

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC PA W-WJKM03,

WJKM04-UPL``

N/A

0-3

39.726389 -80.864940

Guernsey-Upshur complex, 18 to 70 percent slopes, landslip

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

Shallow swale
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-WJKM03,

WJKM04-UPL``

Robinia psuedoacacia 10

Rhus typhina 5

15

7.5 3

Dipsacus fullonum

Reynoutria japonica 5

20

50

25 10

Lonicera japonica 5

5

2.5 1

5

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

FACU

UPL

FACU
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-WJKM03,

WJKM04-UPL``

SL Coarse fragments
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH W-WJKM04 (a & b)

N/A

39.725628 -80.865287

Chagrin silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

Toe of Slope

Depressional
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-WJKM04 (a & b)

Securigera varia

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

FACW

UPL

UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-WJKM04 (a & b)

Portions of the wetland that contained hydric soils were overlaid with rip-rap rock. Also, portions of the area that contain

hydrology and hydrophytes lacked hydric soils; likely due to historic disturbance.
13

W-WJKM04b

SW

W-WJKM04 (a & b)

14

W-WJKM04b

NE

15

W-WJKM04b

South

16

W-WJKM04b

SE
17

W-WJKM04a

SSE

W-WJKM04 (a & b) PEM

18

W-WJKM04a

SSW

19

W-WJKM04a

WSW

20

W-WJKM04a

West

11/08/19
W-WJKM04a

238 SqFt

W-WJKM04b

2,672 SqFt

63

64

62

61

20

19 18

17

16

15

14

13

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH W-WJKM05-PEM

N/A

39.725013 -80.864803

Chagrin silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type: NRPWW
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Securigera varia

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

Soils have weak relict redox mixed into an unconsolidated soil; likely a result of historic pipeline ROW disturbances.

Connected to a large system that has similar soils, clear hydrology, and clear dominance of hydrophytes.
21

NNW

W-WJKM05-PEM

22

23

SW

24

North
W-WJKM05-PEM

922 SqFt

W-WJKM05-PFO

22,507 SqFt

W-WJKM5-UPL

63

64

62

61

26

25

24

23

22

21

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH W-WJKM05-PFO

N/A

39.724626 -80.864461

Woolper silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes

Cowardin Code: PFO HGM: Water Type: NRPWW
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Alisima subcordatum

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

OBL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
25

South

W-WJKM05-PFO PFO

26

SE

27

West

28

NNE
W-WJKM05-PEM

922 SqFt

W-WJKM05-PFO

22,507 SqFt

W-WJKM5-UPL

63

64

62

61

26

25

24

23

22

21

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
W-WJKM05-PFO

22,507 SqFt

28

27

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline 11/08/19

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH W-WJKM05-UPL

N/A

0-3

39.724656 -80.864430

Woolper silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

Floodplain
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-WJKM05-UPL

Rubus allegheniensis 10

Rosa multiflora 5

15

7.5 3

Dipsacus fullonum 10

Solidago canadensis 50

Asclepias syriaca 5

Phleum pratense 25

Dactylis glomerata 10

100

50 20

4

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

FACU

FACU

FACU

UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-WJKM05-UPL

0-20 10YR 4/3 80 10YR 5/4 20 C M GRSIC Unconsolidated
1

W-WJKM05-

2

3 4

11/08/19
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH

N/A

39.723532 -80.861922

Guernsey-Westmore silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, moderately eroded

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

*Surface was was sheet flowing across wetland during visit; likely due to heavy rains the day prior.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Solidago gigantea 5

85

42.5 17

1

50

45 90

40 160

85 250

2.94

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
29

East

30

West

31

SW

32

East
W-WJKM06-UPL

W-WJKM06

662 SqFt

W-KP03

5,236 SqFt

W-KP04

1,534 SqFt

W-KP03, W-KP04-UPL

80

79

78

77

76

75

74

73

32

31

30

29

52

51

50

49

48

47

46

45

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Pipeline 11/08/19

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH W-WJKM06-UPL

N/A

0-3

Guernsey-Westmore silt loams, 35 to 70 percent slopes, moderately eroded

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

Shallow swale
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-WJKM06-UPL

50

Solidago canadensis 40

Asclepias syriaca 5

95

47.5 19

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-WJKM06-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP01-PEM

N/A

Gilpin -Upshur silt loams, 35 to 70 percent slopes None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP01-PEM

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

W-KP01-PEM
33

W-KP01-PEM

34

35 36
W-KP01-UPL

W-KP01-PFO

3,069 SqFt

W-KP01-PEM

40,422 SqFt

72

71

36

35

34

33

40

39

38 37

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP01-PFO

N/A

NAD 83

Gilpin-Upshur silt loams, 35 to 70 percent slopes None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

0.5

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP01-PFO

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

W-KP01-PFO
37

W-KP01-PFO

38

39 40
W-KP01-UPL

W-KP01-PFO

3,069 SqFt

W-KP01-PEM

40,422 SqFt

72

71

36

35

34

33

40

39

38 37

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP01-UPL

N/A

NAD 83

Gilpin -Upshur silt loams, 35 to 70 percent slopes None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN

UPLAND
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP01-UPL

0

0 0

0

0 0

0

0%

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

W-KP01-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP02

N/A

NAD 83

Gilpin -Upshur silt loams, 35 to 70 percent slopes None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP02

0

0 0

0

0 0

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-KP02
41 42

43 44
W-KP02-UPL

W-KP02

1,094 SqFt

44

43

42

41

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH W-KP02-UPL

N/A

39.721637 -80.861117 NAD 83

Gilpin -Upshur silt loams, 35 to 70 percent slopes None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN

UPLAND
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP02-UPL

0

0 0

Dipsacus fullonum

Securigera varia

Phleum pratense

Dactylis glomerata

Symphyotrichum ericoides

0

0 0

0

2

0

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

FACU

FACU

FACU

FACU

UPL

FACU

FACU

UPL

FACU
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

W-KP02-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

N/A

NAD 83

None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 
45 46

47 48
W-WJKM06-UPL

W-WJKM06

662 SqFt

W-KP03

5,236 SqFt

W-KP04

1,534 SqFt

W-KP03, W-KP04-UPL

80

79

78

77

76

75

74

73

32

31

30

29

52

51

50

49

48

47

46

45

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP03,W-KP04-UPL

N/A

NAD 83

None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN

UPLAND
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP03,W-KP04-UPL

0

0 0

0

0 0

0

0

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

W-KP03,W-KP04-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

N/A

NAD 83

None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 
49 50

51 52
W-WJKM06-UPL

W-WJKM06

662 SqFt

W-KP03

5,236 SqFt

W-KP04

1,534 SqFt

W-KP03, W-KP04-UPL

80

79

78

77

76

75

74

73

32

31

30

29

52

51

50

49

48

47

46

45

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

N/A

Vandalia-Sees silt loams, 18 to 35 percent slopes

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
53 54

55 56
W-KP05

719 SqFt

W-KP06

4,311 SqFt

W-KP05, W-KP06-UPL

88

87

86

85

84

83

82

81

60

59

58

57

56

55

54

53

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP05,W-KP06-UPL

N/A

Vandalia-Sees silt loams, 18 to 35 percent slopes

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP05,W-KP06-UPL

0

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-KP05,W-KP06-UPL

GRCL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

N/A

Vandalia-Sees silt loams, 18 to 35 percent slopes

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
57 58

59 60
W-KP05

719 SqFt

W-KP06

4,311 SqFt

W-KP05, W-KP06-UPL

88

87

86

85

84

83

82

81

60

59

58

57

56

55

54

53

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

N/A

Made land

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Solidago sp.

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
61 62

63 64
W-KP07

10,855 SqFt

W-KP07-UPL

90

89

64

63

62

61

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP07-UPL

N/A

Made land

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP07-UPL

0

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-KP07-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP08

N/A

Made land

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
65 66

67 68
W-KP08

4,296 SqFt

W-KP09

906 SqFt

W-KP08, W-KP09-UPL

96

94 95

93

99

98

97

72

71

70

69

68

67 66

65

100

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP08,W-KP09-UPL

N/A

Sees-Woolper silt loams, 18 to 35 percent slopes

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP08,W-KP09-UPL

0

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-KP08,W-KP09-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

PA W-KP09

N/A

Sees-Woolper silt loams, 18 to 35 percent slopes

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Epilobium coloratum

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
69 70

71 72
W-KP08

4,296 SqFt

W-KP09

906 SqFt

W-KP08, W-KP09-UPL

96

94 95

93

99

98

97

72

71

70

69

68

67 66

65

100

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP10

N/A

NAD 83

Made land None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

0.5

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP10

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

W-KP10
73 74

75 76
W-KP10-UPL

W-KP10

1,602 SqFt

76

75

74

73

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC W-KP10-UPL

N/A

39.70683 -80.844787 NAD 83

Made land None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP10-UPL

Poa pratensis

0

0 0

0

0

.50 .20

30'

15'

FAC

FACU

FACU

FACU
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-KP10-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC

N/A

NAD 83

Sees-Woolper silt loams, 18 to 35 percent slopes None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 
77 78

79 80
W-KP11-UPL

W-KP11

6,278 SqFt

80

79 78

77

108

107

106

105

104

103

102

101

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP11-UPL

N/A

Sees-Woolper silt loams, 18 to 35 percent slopes

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP11-UPL

0

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-KP11-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP12

N/A

NAD 83

Sees-Woolper silt loams, 18 to 35 percent slopes None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP12

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-KP12
81 82

83 84
W-KP12

2,991 SqFt

W-KP13

5,717 SqFt

W-KP12, W-KP13-UPL

88

87

86

85

84

83

82

81

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP12,W-KP13-UPL

N/A

NAD 83

Sees-Woolper silt loams, 18 to 35 percent slopes None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN

UPLAND
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP12,W-KP13-UPL

0

0 0

0

0 0

0

0%

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

FACU
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

W-KP12,W-KP13-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP13

N/A

NAD 83

None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

0.5

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP13

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

W-KP13
85

W-KP13 PEM

86

87 88

11/12/2019
W-KP12

2,991 SqFt

W-KP13

5,717 SqFt

W-KP12, W-KP13-UPL

88

87

86

85

84

83

82

81

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

N/A

39.708465 -80.847725 NAD 83

None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

0.5

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 
89

PEM

90

91 92
W-KP14-UPL

W-KP14

5,197 SqFt

92 91

90

89

112

111

109 110

116

115

114

113

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

N/A

NAD 83

None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 
93

PEM

94

95 96
W-KP15-UPL

W-KP15

1,054 SqFt

W-KP16

4,621 SqFt

W-KP16-UPL

99

98

97

96

95

94

93

120

119

118

117

100

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP14,W-KP15-UPL

N/A

39.709039 -80.846695 NAD 83

None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP14,W-KP15-UPL

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-KP14,W-KP15-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP16

N/A

NAD 83

Made land None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP16

0

0 0

.50 .20

30'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

W-KP16
97 98

99 100
W-KP15-UPL

W-KP15

1,054 SqFt

W-KP16

4,621 SqFt

W-KP16-UPL

99

98

97

96

95

94

93

120

119

118

117

100

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

W-KP16-UPL

N/A

NAD 83

Made land None

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

LRRN

UPLAND
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KP16-UPL

0

0 0

Alopecurus sp.

0

0 0

240

340

3.77

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

W-KP16-UPL
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC

N/A

39.708334 -80.839296

Made Land

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type: NRPWW
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Juncus tenuis 15

Phleum pratense 15

Persicaria pennsylvanica 10

Juncus effusus 10

95

47.5 19

4

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

FACW

FACW

FACU

FAC
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
101

NW

W-KM1 PEM

102

103 104

07/17/19
W-KM2

2,931 SqFt

W-KM1

743 SqFt

W-KM1, W-KM2, W-KM3, W-KM4-UPL

108

107

106

105

104

103

102

101

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project Monroe 07/17/19

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC OH W-KM1, KM2, KM3, KM4-UPL

KMM, JDL N/A

0-3%

39.708335 -80.839372

Made Land N/A

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type:

soil stockpile area Convex

Upland point taken in the only portion of investigated terminal site that had vegetation and soils. The remainder of

the property is an existing gravel pad.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

W-KM1, KM2, KM3, KM4-UPL

Phleum pratense 35

Dactylis glomerata 25

Phytolacca americana 5

Dipsacus fullonum 5

Daucus carota 5

Achillea millefolium 5

Solidago canadensis 5

85

42.5 17

0

2

0%

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'

FACU

FACU

FACU

UPL

FACU

FACU

FACU
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

W-KM1, KM2, KM3, KM4-UPL

0-18 10YR 5/4 100 GRSICL Stockpiled Fill
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC

N/A

39.708606 -80.839172

Made Land

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type: NRPWW
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

Eleocharis palustris

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17
105

W-KM2 PEM

106

107 108

NW

07/17/19
W-KM2

2,931 SqFt

W-KM1

743 SqFt

W-KM1, W-KM2, W-KM3, W-KM4-UPL

108

107

106

105

104

103

102

101

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC

N/A

39.709015 -80.838248

Made Land

Cowardin Code: HGM: Slope Water Type: NRPWW
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

90
109

East

W-KM3 PEM

110

SSW

111

ESE

112

SW

07/17/19
W-KM3

673 SqFt

W-KM4

1,089 SqFt 116

115

114

113

112

111

110

109

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region 

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: 

Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 

Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: 

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: 

Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No 

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Is the Sampled Area 

within a Wetland? Yes No 

Remarks: 

HYDROLOGY 

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 

 Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) 

 High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) 

 Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) 

 Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 

 Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) 

 Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 

 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 

 Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) 

 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) 

 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) 

 Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 

Field Observations: 

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 

(includes capillary fringe) 

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 

Remarks: 

Long Ridge Energy Terminal Project

Long Ridge Energy Terminal, LLC

N/A

39.709333 -80.838029

Made Land

Cowardin Code: HGM: Water Type: NRPWW
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________

 Absolute Dominant Indicator 

Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 = Total Cover 

 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 

Dominance Test worksheet: 

Number of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 

Total Number of Dominant 

Species Across All Strata: (B) 

Percent of Dominant Species 

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 

Prevalence Index worksheet: 

 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 

OBL species x 1 = 

FACW species x 2 = 

FAC species x 3 = 

FACU species x 4 = 

UPL species x 5 = 

Column Totals: (A) (B) 

 Prevalence Index = B/A = 

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 

 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 

 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 

 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01

 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 

 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 

 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 

1

Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 

be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 

Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 

more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 

height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 

than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 

m) tall. 

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 

of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 

height.

Hydrophytic 

Vegetation 

Present? Yes No 

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 

.50 .20

30'

5'

15'

15'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 

SOIL Sampling Point: 

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 

 Depth Matrix Redox Features 

 (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1

 Loc2 Texture Remarks 

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

 Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)

 Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

 Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) 

 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) 

 Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)

 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 

 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) 

 Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) 

 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,

MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 

 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 

3

Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 

 Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, 

 Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. 

Restrictive Layer (if observed): 

 Type: 

 Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 

Remarks: 

V17

10YR 4/1 40

10YR 4/3 15
113

W-KM4 PFO

114

115

SE

116

NNW

07/17/19
W-KM3

673 SqFt

W-KM4

1,089 SqFt 116

115

114

113

112

111

110

109

Notes:

1) Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online 

World Imagery map service (© 2015 ESRI and its data 

suppliers).

±

1 inch = 50 feet

Legend

") Sampling Point

Culvert Pipe

Drainage

Ephemeral Stream

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream

Wetland Open End

PEM Wetland

PFO Wetland

Study Area

Stream Photo

Location & Direction

Wetland Photo

Location & Direction

PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION MAP

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL PROJECT

LONG RIDGE ENERGY TERMINAL, LLC

MONROE COUNTY, OHIO

Drawn: PD 11/21/19 Checked: KM 11/21/19 Approved: HS 11/21/19

50 0 50

Feet
APPENDIX C: ORAM FORMS 
1

Background Information

Name: 

Date: 

Affiliation:

Address: 

Phone Number: 

e-mail address: 

Name of Wetland: 

Vegetation Communit(ies):

HGM Class(es): 

Location of Wetland: include map, address, north arrow, landmarks, distances, roads, etc. 

Lat/Long or UTM Coordinate

USGS Quad Name

County

Township

Section and Subsection 

Hydrologic Unit Code

Site Visit

National Wetland Inventory Map

Ohio Wetland Inventory Map

Soil Survey

Delineation report/map

Attached.

39.745837, -80.871736

New Martinsville

Monroe

Clarington

N/A

05030201

11/06/2019

Fig. 2

Wyatt Jackson

11/06/2019

wyatt.jackson@tetratech.com

W-WJKM01

Slope

PEM
2

Name of Wetland:

Wetland Size (acres, hectares):

Sketch: Include north arrow, relationship with other surface waters, vegetation zones, etc.

Comments, Narrative Discussion, Justification of Category Changes:

Final score : Category:

W-WJKM01

< 0.01

See Attached.

Very small wetland on side slope. Adjacent to soils disturbed by agricultural activity.

13 1
3

Scoring Boundary Worksheet

INSTRUCTIONS. The initial step in completing the ORAM is to identify the “scoring boundaries” of the wetland 

being rated. In many instances this determination will be relatively easy and the scoring boundaries will coincide 

with the “jurisdictional boundaries.” For example, the scoring boundary of an isolated cattail marsh located in the 

middle of a farm field will likely be the same as that wetland’s jurisdictional boundaries. In other instances, 

however, the scoring boundary will not be as easily determined. Wetlands that are small or isolated from other 

surface waters often form large contiguous areas or heterogeneous complexes of wetland and upland. In separating 

wetlands for scoring purposes, the hydrologic regime of the wetland is the main criterion that should be used. 

Boundaries between contiguous or connected wetlands should be established where the volume, flow, or velocity of 

water moving through the wetland changes significantly. Areas with a high degree of hydrologic interaction should 

be scored as a single wetland. In determining a wetland’s scoring boundaries, use the guidelines in the ORAM 

Manual Section 5.0. In certain instances, it may be difficult to establish the scoring boundary for the wetland being 

rated. These problem situations include wetlands that form a patchwork on the landscape, wetlands divided by 

artificial boundaries like property fences, roads, or railroad embankments, wetlands that are contiguous with 

streams, lakes, or rivers, and estuarine or coastal wetlands. These situations are discussed below, however, it is 

recommended that Rater contact Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water, 401/Wetlands Section if there are additional 

questions or a need for further clarification of the appropriate scoring boundaries of a particular wetland.

# Steps in properly establishing scoring boundaries done? not applicable

Step 1 Identify the wetland area of interest. This may be the site of a 

proposed impact, a reference site, conservation site, etc.

Step 2 Identify the locations where there is physical evidence that hydrology 

changes rapidly. Such evidence includes both natural and humaninduced changes including, constrictions caused by berms or dikes, 

points where the water velocity changes rapidly at rapids or falls, 

points where significant inflows occur at the confluence of rivers, or 

other factors that may restrict hydrologic interaction between the 

wetlands or parts of a single wetland.

Step 3 Delineate the boundary of the wetland to be rated such that all areas 

of interest that are contiguous to and within the areas where the 

hydrology does not change significantly, i.e. areas that have a high 

degree of hydrologic interaction are included within the scoring 

boundary.

Step 4 Determine if artificial boundaries, such as property lines, state lines, 

roads, railroad embankments, etc., are present. These should not be 

used to establish scoring boundaries unless they coincide with areas 

where the hydrologic regime changes.

Step 5 In all instances, the Rater may enlarge the minimum scoring 

boundaries discussed here to score together wetlands that could be 

scored separately.

Step 6 Consult ORAM Manual Section 5.0 for how to establish scoring 

boundaries for wetlands that form a patchwork on the landscape, 

divided by artificial boundaries, contiguous to streams, lakes or rivers, 

or for dual classifications.

End of Scoring Boundary Determination. Begin Narrative Rating on next page.
4

Narrative Rating

INSTRUCTIONS. Answer each of the following questions. Questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 should be answered based on 

information obtained from the site visit or the literature and by submitting a Data Services Request to the Ohio 

Department of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Natural Heritage Data Services, 1889 

Fountain Square Court, Building F-1, Columbus, Ohio 43224, 614-265-6453 (phone), 614-265-3096 (fax),

http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/dnap . The remaining questions are designed to be answered primarily by the results of 

the site visit. Refer to the User’s Manual for descriptions of these wetland types. Note: "Critical habitat" is legally 

defined in the Endangered Species Act and is the geographic area containing physical or biological features essential 

to the conservation of a listed species or as an area that may require special management considerations or 

protection. The Rater should contact the Region 3 Headquarters or the Columbus Ecological Services Office for 

updates as to whether critical habitat has been designated for other federally listed threatened or endangered species. 

“Documented” means the wetland is listed in the appropriate State of Ohio database.

# Question Circle one

1 Critical Habitat. Is the wetland in a township, section, or subsection of 

a United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute Quadrangle that has 

been designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as "critical 

habitat" for any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? 

Note: as of January 1, 2001, of the federally listed endangered or 

threatened species which can be found in Ohio, the Indiana Bat has 

had critical habitat designated (50 CFR 17.95(a)) and the piping plover 

has had critical habitat proposed (65 FR 41812 July 6, 2000).

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 2

NO

Go to Question 2

2 Threatened or Endangered Species. Is the wetland known to contain 

an individual of, or documented occurrences of federal or state-listed 

threatened or endangered plant or animal species?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland. 

Go to Question 3

NO

Go to Question 3

3 Documented High Quality Wetland. Is the wetland on record in 

Natural Heritage Database as a high quality wetland? 

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 4

NO

Go to Question 4

4 Significant Breeding or Concentration Area. Does the wetland 

contain documented regionally significant breeding or nonbreeding 

waterfowl, neotropical songbird, or shorebird concentration areas? 

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 5

NO

Go to Question 5

5 Category 1 Wetlands. Is the wetland less than 0.5 hectares (1 acre) 

in size and hydrologically isolated and either 1) comprised of 

vegetation that is dominated (greater than eighty per cent areal cover) 

by Phalaris arundinacea, Lythrum salicaria, or Phragmites australis, or 

2) an acidic pond created or excavated on mined lands that has little or 

no vegetation?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

1 wetland 

Go to Question 6

NO

Go to Question 6

6 Bogs. Is the wetland a peat-accumulating wetland that 1) has no 

significant inflows or outflows, 2) supports acidophilic mosses, 

particularly Sphagnum spp., 3) the acidophilic mosses have >30% 

cover, 4) at least one species from Table 1 is present, and 5) the 

cover of invasive species (see Table 1) is <25%?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 7

NO

Go to Question 7

7 Fens. Is the wetland a carbon accumulating (peat, muck) wetland that 

is saturated during most of the year, primarily by a discharge of free 

flowing, mineral rich, ground water with a circumneutral ph (5.5-9.0) 

and with one or more plant species listed in Table 1 and the cover of 

invasive species listed in Table 1 is <25%?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 8a

NO

Go to Question 8a

8a "Old Growth Forest." Is the wetland a forested wetland and is the 

forest characterized by, but not limited to, the following characteristics: 

overstory canopy trees of great age (exceeding at least 50% of a 

projected maximum attainable age for a species); little or no evidence 

of human-caused understory disturbance during the past 80 to 100 

years; an all-aged structure and multilayered canopies; aggregations of 

canopy trees interspersed with canopy gaps; and significant numbers 

of standing dead snags and downed logs?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland. 

Go to Question 8b

NO

Go to Question 8b
5

8b Mature forested wetlands. Is the wetland a forested wetland with 

50% or more of the cover of upper forest canopy consisting of 

deciduous trees with large diameters at breast height (dbh), generally 

diameters greater than 45cm (17.7in) dbh?

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status. 

Go to Question 9a

NO

Go to Question 9a

9a Lake Erie coastal and tributary wetlands. Is the wetland located at 

an elevation less than 575 feet on the USGS map, adjacent to this 

elevation, or along a tributary to Lake Erie that is accessible to fish?

YES

Go to Question 9b

NO

Go to Question 10

9b Does the wetland's hydrology result from measures designed to 

prevent erosion and the loss of aquatic plants, i.e. the wetland is 

partially hydrologically restricted from Lake Erie due to lakeward or 

landward dikes or other hydrological controls? 

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 9c

9c Are Lake Erie water levels the wetland's primary hydrological influence, 

i.e. the wetland is hydrologically unrestricted (no lakeward or upland 

border alterations), or the wetland can be characterized as an 

"estuarine" wetland with lake and river influenced hydrology. These 

include sandbar deposition wetlands, estuarine wetlands, river mouth 

wetlands, or those dominated by submersed aquatic vegetation.

YES

Go to Question 9d 

NO

Go to Question 10

9d Does the wetland have a predominance of native species within its 

vegetation communities, although non-native or disturbance tolerant 

native species can also be present?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 9e

9e Does the wetland have a predominance of non-native or disturbance 

tolerant native plant species within its vegetation communities?

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 10

10 Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) Is the wetland located in 

Lucas, Fulton, Henry, or Wood Counties and can the wetland be 

characterized by the following description: the wetland has a sandy 

substrate with interspersed organic matter, a water table often within 

several inches of the surface, and often with a dominance of the 

gramineous vegetation listed in Table 1 (woody species may also be 

present). The Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of 

Natural Areas and Preserves can provide assistance in confirming this 

type of wetland and its quality.

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland.

Go to Question 11

NO

Go to Question 11

11 Relict Wet Prairies. Is the wetland a relict wet prairie community 

dominated by some or all of the species in Table 1. Extensive prairies 

were formerly located in the Darby Plains (Madison and Union 

Counties), Sandusky Plains (Wyandot, Crawford, and Marion 

Counties), northwest Ohio (e.g. Erie, Huron, Lucas, Wood Counties),

and portions of western Ohio Counties (e.g. Darke, Mercer, Miami, 

Montgomery, Van Wert etc.).

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Complete Quantitative

Rating

NO

Complete 

Quantitative

Rating
6

Table 1. Characteristic plant species.

invasive/exotic spp fen species bog species 0ak Opening species wet prairie species

Lythrum salicaria

Myriophyllum spicatum 

Najas minor 

Phalaris arundinacea

Phragmites australis 

Potamogeton crispus

Ranunculus ficaria 

Rhamnus frangula

Typha angustifolia 

Typha xglauca

Zygadenus elegans var. glaucus 

Cacalia plantaginea 

Carex flava

Carex sterilis 

Carex stricta

Deschampsia caespitosa

Eleocharis rostellata

Eriophorum viridicarinatum 

Gentianopsis spp.

Lobelia kalmii

Parnassia glauca

Potentilla fruticosa

Rhamnus alnifolia 

Rhynchospora capillacea

Salix candida

Salix myricoides

Salix serissima

Solidago ohioensis 

Tofieldia glutinosa 

Triglochin maritimum 

Triglochin palustre

Calla palustris 

Carex atlantica var. capillacea

Carex echinata

Carex oligosperma

Carex trisperma

Chamaedaphne calyculata 

Decodon verticillatus 

Eriophorum virginicum 

Larix laricina 

Nemopanthus mucronatus 

Schechzeria palustris

Sphagnum spp. 

Vaccinium macrocarpon

Vaccinium corymbosum

Vaccinium oxycoccos

Woodwardia virginica 

Xyris difformis 

Carex cryptolepis

Carex lasiocarpa

Carex stricta

Cladium mariscoides

Calamagrostis stricta

Calamagrostis canadensis

Quercus palustris

Calamagrostis canadensis

Calamogrostis stricta

Carex atherodes

Carex buxbaumii

Carex pellita

Carex sartwellii

Gentiana andrewsii

Helianthus grosseserratus

Liatris spicata

Lysimachia quadriflora

Lythrum alatum

Pycnanthemum virginianum

Silphium terebinthinaceum

Sorghastrum nutans

Spartina pectinata

Solidago riddellii

End of Narrative Rating. Begin Quantitative Rating on next page.
7

ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rater(s): Date:

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size).

max 6 pts. subtotal Select one size class and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts)

25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts)

10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts)

3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts)

0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts)

0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt)

<0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use.

max 14 pts. subtotal 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check.

WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7)

MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4)

NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1)

VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average.

VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7)

LOW. Old field (>10 years), shrub land, young second growth forest. (5)

MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pasture, park, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3)

HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology.

max 30 pts. subtotal 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply. 3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) 100 year floodplain (1)

Other groundwater (3) Between stream/lake and other human use (1)

Precipitation (1) Part of wetland/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1)

Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check.

3c. Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score. Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4)

>0.7 (27.6in) (3) Regularly inundated/saturated (3)

0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) Seasonally inundated (2)

<0.4m (<15.7in) (1) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (12) Check all disturbances observed

Recovered (7) ditch point source (nonstormwater)

Recovering (3) tile filling/grading

Recent or no recovery (1) dike road bed/RR track

weir dredging

stormwater input other_____________________

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development.

max 20 pts. subtotal 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (4)

Recovered (3)

Recovering (2)

Recent or no recovery (1)

4b. Habitat development. Select only one and assign score.

Excellent (7)

Very good (6)

Good (5)

Moderately good (4)

Fair (3)

Poor to fair (2)

Poor (1)

4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average. 

None or none apparent (9) Check all disturbances observed

Recovered (6) mowing shrub/sapling removal

Recovering (3) grazing herbaceous/aquatic bed removal

Recent or no recovery (1) clearcutting sedimentation

selective cutting dredging

woody debris removal farming

toxic pollutants nutrient enrichment

subtotal this page

last revised 1 February 2001 jjm

Between stream/lake and other human use (1)

W-WJKM01 Wyatt Jackson 11/06/2019

0

1 1

7 8

tilling

3 11

11
8

ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rater(s): Date:

subtotal first page

Metric 5. Special Wetlands.

max 10 pts. subtotal Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Old growth forest (10)

Mature forested wetland (5)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-unrestricted hydrology (10)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-restricted hydrology (5)

Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10)

Relict Wet Prairies (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10)

Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10)

Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography.

max 20 pts. subtotal 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities. Vegetation Community Cover Scale

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. 0 Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area

Aquatic bed 1 Present and either comprises small part of wetland's

Emergent vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a 

Shrub significant part but is of low quality

Forest 2 Present and either comprises significant part of wetland's 

Mudflats vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small 

Open water part and is of high quality

Other__________________ 3 Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. vegetation and is of high quality

Select only one.

High (5) Narrative Description of Vegetation Quality

Moderately high(4) low Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or

Moderate (3) disturbance tolerant native species

Moderately low (2) mod Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation,

Low (1) although nonnative and/or disturbance tolerant native spp

None (0) can also be present, and species diversity moderate to 

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer moderately high, but generally w/o presence of rare

to Table 1 ORAM long form for list. Add threatened or endangered spp

or deduct points for coverage high A predominance of native species, with nonnative spp

Extensive >75% cover (-5) and/or disturbance tolerant native spp absent or virtually

Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always,

Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

Nearly absent <5% cover (0)

Absent (1) Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality

6d. Microtopography. 0 Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres)

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. 1 Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)

Vegetated hummucks/tussucks 2 Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres)

Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in) 3 High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Standing dead >25cm (10in) dbh

Amphibian breeding pools Microtopography Cover Scale

0 Absent

1 Present very small amounts or if more common

 of marginal quality

2 Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest

 quality or in small amounts of highest quality

3 Present in moderate or greater amounts

 and of highest quality

End of Quantitative Rating. Complete Categorization Worksheets.

W-WJKM01 Wyatt Jackson 11/06/2019

11

0 11

2 13

13

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
9

ORAM Summary Worksheet 

circle 

answer or 

insert 

score

Result

Narrative Rating Question 1 Critical Habitat YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 2. Threatened or Endangered 

Species

YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 3. High Quality Natural Wetland YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 4. Significant bird habitat YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 5. Category 1 Wetlands YES NO If yes, Category 1.

Question 6. Bogs YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 7. Fens YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 8a. Old Growth Forest YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 8b. Mature Forested Wetland YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 9b. Lake Erie Wetlands -

Restricted

YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 9d. Lake Erie Wetlands –

Unrestricted with native plants

YES NO If yes, Category 3

Question 9e. Lake Erie Wetlands -

Unrestricted with invasive plants

YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 10. Oak Openings YES NO If yes, Category 3

Question 11. Relict Wet Prairies YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be

1 or 2.

Quantitative 

Rating

Metric 1. Size

Metric 2. Buffers and surrounding land use

Metric 3. Hydrology

Metric 4. Habitat

Metric 5. Special Wetland Communities

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, 

microtopography

TOTAL SCORE Category based on score 

breakpoints

Complete Wetland Categorization Worksheet.

Question 6. Bogs

13 1

2

0

3

7

1

0
10

Wetland Categorization Worksheet 

Choices Circle one Evaluation of Categorization Result of ORAM

Did you answer "Yes" to any 

of the following questions:

Narrative Rating Nos. 2, 3, 

4, 6, 7, 8a, 9d, 10

YES

Wetland is 

categorized as a 

Category 3 wetland

NO Is quantitative rating score less than the Category 2 scoring 

threshold (excluding gray zone)? If yes, reevaluate the 

category of the wetland using the narrative criteria in OAC 

Rule 3745-1-54(C) and biological and/or functional 

assessments to determine if the wetland has been overcategorized by the ORAM

Did you answer "Yes" to any 

of the following questions:

Narrative Rating Nos. 1, 8b, 

9b, 9e, 11

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for 

possible Category 

3 status 

NO Evaluate the wetland using the 1) narrative criteria in OAC 

Rule 3745-1-54(C) and 2) the quantitative rating score. If 

the wetland is determined to be a Category 3 wetland using

either of these, it should be categorized as a Category 3 

wetland. Detailed biological and/or functional assessments 

may also be used to determine the wetland's category.

Did you answer "Yes" to 

Narrative Rating No. 5

YES

Wetland is 

categorized as a 

Category 1 wetland

NO Is quantitative rating score greater than the Category 2 

scoring threshold (including any gray zone)? If yes, 

reevaluate the category of the wetland using the narrative 

criteria in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C) and biological and/or 

functional assessments to determine if the wetland has 

been under-categorized by the ORAM

Does the quantitative score 

fall within the scoring range 

of a Category 1, 2, or 3 

wetland?

YES

Wetland is 

assigned to the 

appropriate 

category based on 

the scoring range

NO If the score of the wetland is located within the scoring 

range for a particular category, the wetland should be 

assigned to that category. In all instances however, the 

narrative criteria described in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C) can 

be used to clarify or change a categorization based on a 

quantitative score.

Does the quantitative score 

fall with the "gray zone" for 

Category 1 or 2 or Category 

2 or 3 wetlands?

YES

Wetland is 

assigned to the 

higher of the two 

categories or 

assigned to a 

category based on

detailed 

assessments and 

the narrative 

criteria

NO Rater has the option of assigning the wetland to the higher 

of the two categories or to assign a category based on the 

results of a nonrapid wetland assessment method, e.g. 

functional assessment, biological assessment, etc, and a 

consideration of the narrative criteria in OAC rule 3745-1-

54(C).

Does the wetland otherwise 

exhibit moderate OR superior

hydrologic OR habitat, OR 

recreational functions AND 

the wetland was not

categorized as a Category 2 

wetland (in the case of 

moderate functions) or a 

Category 3 wetland (in the 

case of superior functions) by 

this method?

YES

Wetland was 

undercategorized 

by this method. A 

written justification 

for recategorization 

should be provided 

on Background 

Information Form

NO

Wetland is 

assigned to 

category as 

determined 

by the 

ORAM.

A wetland may be undercategorized using this method, but 

still exhibit one or more superior functions, e.g. a wetland's 

biotic communities may be degraded by human activities, 

but the wetland may still exhibit superior hydrologic 

functions because of its type, landscape position, size, local 

or regional significance, etc. In this circumstance, the 

narrative criteria in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C)(2) and (3) are 

controlling, and the under-categorization should be 

corrected. A written justification with supporting reasons or 

information for this determination should be provided.

Final Category

Choose one Category 1 Category 2 Category 3

End of Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands.










1

Background Information

Name: 

Date: 

Affiliation:

Address: 

Phone Number: 

e-mail address: 

Name of Wetland: 

Vegetation Communit(ies):

HGM Class(es): 

Location of Wetland: include map, address, north arrow, landmarks, distances, roads, etc. 

Lat/Long or UTM Coordinate

USGS Quad Name

County

Township

Section and Subsection 

Hydrologic Unit Code

Site Visit

National Wetland Inventory Map

Ohio Wetland Inventory Map

Soil Survey

Delineation report/map

Attached.

39.726499, -80.865057

New Martinsville

Monroe

Salem

N/A

05030201

11/08/2019

Fig. 2

Wyatt Jackson

11/08/2019

wyatt.jackson@tetratech.com

W-WJKM03

Slope

PEM
2

Name of Wetland:

Wetland Size (acres, hectares):

Sketch: Include north arrow, relationship with other surface waters, vegetation zones, etc.

Comments, Narrative Discussion, Justification of Category Changes:

Final score : Category:

W-WJKM03

0.02

See Attached.

12 1
3

Scoring Boundary Worksheet

INSTRUCTIONS. The initial step in completing the ORAM is to identify the “scoring boundaries” of the wetland 

being rated. In many instances this determination will be relatively easy and the scoring boundaries will coincide 

with the “jurisdictional boundaries.” For example, the scoring boundary of an isolated cattail marsh located in the 

middle of a farm field will likely be the same as that wetland’s jurisdictional boundaries. In other instances, 

however, the scoring boundary will not be as easily determined. Wetlands that are small or isolated from other 

surface waters often form large contiguous areas or heterogeneous complexes of wetland and upland. In separating 

wetlands for scoring purposes, the hydrologic regime of the wetland is the main criterion that should be used. 

Boundaries between contiguous or connected wetlands should be established where the volume, flow, or velocity of 

water moving through the wetland changes significantly. Areas with a high degree of hydrologic interaction should 

be scored as a single wetland. In determining a wetland’s scoring boundaries, use the guidelines in the ORAM 

Manual Section 5.0. In certain instances, it may be difficult to establish the scoring boundary for the wetland being 

rated. These problem situations include wetlands that form a patchwork on the landscape, wetlands divided by 

artificial boundaries like property fences, roads, or railroad embankments, wetlands that are contiguous with 

streams, lakes, or rivers, and estuarine or coastal wetlands. These situations are discussed below, however, it is 

recommended that Rater contact Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water, 401/Wetlands Section if there are additional 

questions or a need for further clarification of the appropriate scoring boundaries of a particular wetland.

# Steps in properly establishing scoring boundaries done? not applicable

Step 1 Identify the wetland area of interest. This may be the site of a 

proposed impact, a reference site, conservation site, etc.

Step 2 Identify the locations where there is physical evidence that hydrology 

changes rapidly. Such evidence includes both natural and humaninduced changes including, constrictions caused by berms or dikes, 

points where the water velocity changes rapidly at rapids or falls, 

points where significant inflows occur at the confluence of rivers, or 

other factors that may restrict hydrologic interaction between the 

wetlands or parts of a single wetland.

Step 3 Delineate the boundary of the wetland to be rated such that all areas 

of interest that are contiguous to and within the areas where the 

hydrology does not change significantly, i.e. areas that have a high 

degree of hydrologic interaction are included within the scoring 

boundary.

Step 4 Determine if artificial boundaries, such as property lines, state lines, 

roads, railroad embankments, etc., are present. These should not be 

used to establish scoring boundaries unless they coincide with areas 

where the hydrologic regime changes.

Step 5 In all instances, the Rater may enlarge the minimum scoring 

boundaries discussed here to score together wetlands that could be 

scored separately.

Step 6 Consult ORAM Manual Section 5.0 for how to establish scoring 

boundaries for wetlands that form a patchwork on the landscape, 

divided by artificial boundaries, contiguous to streams, lakes or rivers, 

or for dual classifications.

End of Scoring Boundary Determination. Begin Narrative Rating on next page.
4

Narrative Rating

INSTRUCTIONS. Answer each of the following questions. Questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 should be answered based on 

information obtained from the site visit or the literature and by submitting a Data Services Request to the Ohio 

Department of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Natural Heritage Data Services, 1889 

Fountain Square Court, Building F-1, Columbus, Ohio 43224, 614-265-6453 (phone), 614-265-3096 (fax),

http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/dnap . The remaining questions are designed to be answered primarily by the results of 

the site visit. Refer to the User’s Manual for descriptions of these wetland types. Note: "Critical habitat" is legally 

defined in the Endangered Species Act and is the geographic area containing physical or biological features essential 

to the conservation of a listed species or as an area that may require special management considerations or 

protection. The Rater should contact the Region 3 Headquarters or the Columbus Ecological Services Office for 

updates as to whether critical habitat has been designated for other federally listed threatened or endangered species. 

“Documented” means the wetland is listed in the appropriate State of Ohio database.

# Question Circle one

1 Critical Habitat. Is the wetland in a township, section, or subsection of 

a United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute Quadrangle that has 

been designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as "critical 

habitat" for any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? 

Note: as of January 1, 2001, of the federally listed endangered or 

threatened species which can be found in Ohio, the Indiana Bat has 

had critical habitat designated (50 CFR 17.95(a)) and the piping plover 

has had critical habitat proposed (65 FR 41812 July 6, 2000).

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 2

NO

Go to Question 2

2 Threatened or Endangered Species. Is the wetland known to contain 

an individual of, or documented occurrences of federal or state-listed 

threatened or endangered plant or animal species?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland. 

Go to Question 3

NO

Go to Question 3

3 Documented High Quality Wetland. Is the wetland on record in 

Natural Heritage Database as a high quality wetland? 

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 4

NO

Go to Question 4

4 Significant Breeding or Concentration Area. Does the wetland 

contain documented regionally significant breeding or nonbreeding 

waterfowl, neotropical songbird, or shorebird concentration areas? 

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 5

NO

Go to Question 5

5 Category 1 Wetlands. Is the wetland less than 0.5 hectares (1 acre) 

in size and hydrologically isolated and either 1) comprised of 

vegetation that is dominated (greater than eighty per cent areal cover) 

by Phalaris arundinacea, Lythrum salicaria, or Phragmites australis, or 

2) an acidic pond created or excavated on mined lands that has little or 

no vegetation?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

1 wetland 

Go to Question 6

NO

Go to Question 6

6 Bogs. Is the wetland a peat-accumulating wetland that 1) has no 

significant inflows or outflows, 2) supports acidophilic mosses, 

particularly Sphagnum spp., 3) the acidophilic mosses have >30% 

cover, 4) at least one species from Table 1 is present, and 5) the 

cover of invasive species (see Table 1) is <25%?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 7

NO

Go to Question 7

7 Fens. Is the wetland a carbon accumulating (peat, muck) wetland that 

is saturated during most of the year, primarily by a discharge of free 

flowing, mineral rich, ground water with a circumneutral ph (5.5-9.0) 

and with one or more plant species listed in Table 1 and the cover of 

invasive species listed in Table 1 is <25%?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 8a

NO

Go to Question 8a

8a "Old Growth Forest." Is the wetland a forested wetland and is the 

forest characterized by, but not limited to, the following characteristics: 

overstory canopy trees of great age (exceeding at least 50% of a 

projected maximum attainable age for a species); little or no evidence 

of human-caused understory disturbance during the past 80 to 100 

years; an all-aged structure and multilayered canopies; aggregations of 

canopy trees interspersed with canopy gaps; and significant numbers 

of standing dead snags and downed logs?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland. 

Go to Question 8b

NO

Go to Question 8b
5

8b Mature forested wetlands. Is the wetland a forested wetland with 

50% or more of the cover of upper forest canopy consisting of 

deciduous trees with large diameters at breast height (dbh), generally 

diameters greater than 45cm (17.7in) dbh?

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status. 

Go to Question 9a

NO

Go to Question 9a

9a Lake Erie coastal and tributary wetlands. Is the wetland located at 

an elevation less than 575 feet on the USGS map, adjacent to this 

elevation, or along a tributary to Lake Erie that is accessible to fish?

YES

Go to Question 9b

NO

Go to Question 10

9b Does the wetland's hydrology result from measures designed to 

prevent erosion and the loss of aquatic plants, i.e. the wetland is 

partially hydrologically restricted from Lake Erie due to lakeward or 

landward dikes or other hydrological controls? 

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 9c

9c Are Lake Erie water levels the wetland's primary hydrological influence, 

i.e. the wetland is hydrologically unrestricted (no lakeward or upland 

border alterations), or the wetland can be characterized as an 

"estuarine" wetland with lake and river influenced hydrology. These 

include sandbar deposition wetlands, estuarine wetlands, river mouth 

wetlands, or those dominated by submersed aquatic vegetation.

YES

Go to Question 9d 

NO

Go to Question 10

9d Does the wetland have a predominance of native species within its 

vegetation communities, although non-native or disturbance tolerant 

native species can also be present?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 9e

9e Does the wetland have a predominance of non-native or disturbance 

tolerant native plant species within its vegetation communities?

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 10

10 Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) Is the wetland located in 

Lucas, Fulton, Henry, or Wood Counties and can the wetland be 

characterized by the following description: the wetland has a sandy 

substrate with interspersed organic matter, a water table often within 

several inches of the surface, and often with a dominance of the 

gramineous vegetation listed in Table 1 (woody species may also be 

present). The Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of 

Natural Areas and Preserves can provide assistance in confirming this 

type of wetland and its quality.

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland.

Go to Question 11

NO

Go to Question 11

11 Relict Wet Prairies. Is the wetland a relict wet prairie community 

dominated by some or all of the species in Table 1. Extensive prairies 

were formerly located in the Darby Plains (Madison and Union 

Counties), Sandusky Plains (Wyandot, Crawford, and Marion 

Counties), northwest Ohio (e.g. Erie, Huron, Lucas, Wood Counties),

and portions of western Ohio Counties (e.g. Darke, Mercer, Miami, 

Montgomery, Van Wert etc.).

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Complete Quantitative

Rating

NO

Complete 

Quantitative

Rating
6

Table 1. Characteristic plant species.

invasive/exotic spp fen species bog species 0ak Opening species wet prairie species

Lythrum salicaria

Myriophyllum spicatum 

Najas minor 

Phalaris arundinacea

Phragmites australis 

Potamogeton crispus

Ranunculus ficaria 

Rhamnus frangula

Typha angustifolia 

Typha xglauca

Zygadenus elegans var. glaucus 

Cacalia plantaginea 

Carex flava

Carex sterilis 

Carex stricta

Deschampsia caespitosa

Eleocharis rostellata

Eriophorum viridicarinatum 

Gentianopsis spp.

Lobelia kalmii

Parnassia glauca

Potentilla fruticosa

Rhamnus alnifolia 

Rhynchospora capillacea

Salix candida

Salix myricoides

Salix serissima

Solidago ohioensis 

Tofieldia glutinosa 

Triglochin maritimum 

Triglochin palustre

Calla palustris 

Carex atlantica var. capillacea

Carex echinata

Carex oligosperma

Carex trisperma

Chamaedaphne calyculata 

Decodon verticillatus 

Eriophorum virginicum 

Larix laricina 

Nemopanthus mucronatus 

Schechzeria palustris

Sphagnum spp. 

Vaccinium macrocarpon

Vaccinium corymbosum

Vaccinium oxycoccos

Woodwardia virginica 

Xyris difformis 

Carex cryptolepis

Carex lasiocarpa

Carex stricta

Cladium mariscoides

Calamagrostis stricta

Calamagrostis canadensis

Quercus palustris

Calamagrostis canadensis

Calamogrostis stricta

Carex atherodes

Carex buxbaumii

Carex pellita

Carex sartwellii

Gentiana andrewsii

Helianthus grosseserratus

Liatris spicata

Lysimachia quadriflora

Lythrum alatum

Pycnanthemum virginianum

Silphium terebinthinaceum

Sorghastrum nutans

Spartina pectinata

Solidago riddellii

End of Narrative Rating. Begin Quantitative Rating on next page.
7

ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rater(s): Date:

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size).

max 6 pts. subtotal Select one size class and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts)

25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts)

10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts)

3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts)

0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts)

0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt)

<0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use.

max 14 pts. subtotal 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check.

WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7)

MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4)

NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1)

VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average.

VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7)

LOW. Old field (>10 years), shrub land, young second growth forest. (5)

MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pasture, park, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3)

HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology.

max 30 pts. subtotal 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply. 3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) 100 year floodplain (1)

Other groundwater (3) Between stream/lake and other human use (1)

Precipitation (1) Part of wetland/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1)

Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check.

3c. Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score. Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4)

>0.7 (27.6in) (3) Regularly inundated/saturated (3)

0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) Seasonally inundated (2)

<0.4m (<15.7in) (1) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (12) Check all disturbances observed

Recovered (7) ditch point source (nonstormwater)

Recovering (3) tile filling/grading

Recent or no recovery (1) dike road bed/RR track

weir dredging

stormwater input other_____________________

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development.

max 20 pts. subtotal 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (4)

Recovered (3)

Recovering (2)

Recent or no recovery (1)

4b. Habitat development. Select only one and assign score.

Excellent (7)

Very good (6)

Good (5)

Moderately good (4)

Fair (3)

Poor to fair (2)

Poor (1)

4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average. 

None or none apparent (9) Check all disturbances observed

Recovered (6) mowing shrub/sapling removal

Recovering (3) grazing herbaceous/aquatic bed removal

Recent or no recovery (1) clearcutting sedimentation

selective cutting dredging

woody debris removal farming

toxic pollutants nutrient enrichment

subtotal this page

last revised 1 February 2001 jjm

Between stream/lake and other human use (1)

W-WJKM03 Wyatt Jackson 11/08/2019

0

1 1

10 11

3 14

14
8

ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rater(s): Date:

subtotal first page

Metric 5. Special Wetlands.

max 10 pts. subtotal Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Old growth forest (10)

Mature forested wetland (5)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-unrestricted hydrology (10)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-restricted hydrology (5)

Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10)

Relict Wet Prairies (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10)

Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10)

Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography.

max 20 pts. subtotal 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities. Vegetation Community Cover Scale

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. 0 Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area

Aquatic bed 1 Present and either comprises small part of wetland's

Emergent vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a 

Shrub significant part but is of low quality

Forest 2 Present and either comprises significant part of wetland's 

Mudflats vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small 

Open water part and is of high quality

Other__________________ 3 Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. vegetation and is of high quality

Select only one.

High (5) Narrative Description of Vegetation Quality

Moderately high(4) low Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or

Moderate (3) disturbance tolerant native species

Moderately low (2) mod Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation,

Low (1) although nonnative and/or disturbance tolerant native spp

None (0) can also be present, and species diversity moderate to 

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer moderately high, but generally w/o presence of rare

to Table 1 ORAM long form for list. Add threatened or endangered spp

or deduct points for coverage high A predominance of native species, with nonnative spp

Extensive >75% cover (-5) and/or disturbance tolerant native spp absent or virtually

Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always,

Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

Nearly absent <5% cover (0)

Absent (1) Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality

6d. Microtopography. 0 Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres)

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. 1 Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)

Vegetated hummucks/tussucks 2 Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres)

Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in) 3 High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Standing dead >25cm (10in) dbh

Amphibian breeding pools Microtopography Cover Scale

0 Absent

1 Present very small amounts or if more common

 of marginal quality

2 Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest

 quality or in small amounts of highest quality

3 Present in moderate or greater amounts

 and of highest quality

End of Quantitative Rating. Complete Categorization Worksheets.

W-WJKM03 Wyatt Jackson 11/08/2019

14

0 14

-2 12

12

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
9

ORAM Summary Worksheet 

circle 

answer or 

insert 

score

Result

Narrative Rating Question 1 Critical Habitat YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 2. Threatened or Endangered 

Species

YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 3. High Quality Natural Wetland YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 4. Significant bird habitat YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 5. Category 1 Wetlands YES NO If yes, Category 1.

Question 6. Bogs YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 7. Fens YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 8a. Old Growth Forest YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 8b. Mature Forested Wetland YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 9b. Lake Erie Wetlands -

Restricted

YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 9d. Lake Erie Wetlands –

Unrestricted with native plants

YES NO If yes, Category 3

Question 9e. Lake Erie Wetlands -

Unrestricted with invasive plants

YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 10. Oak Openings YES NO If yes, Category 3

Question 11. Relict Wet Prairies YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be

1 or 2.

Quantitative 

Rating

Metric 1. Size

Metric 2. Buffers and surrounding land use

Metric 3. Hydrology

Metric 4. Habitat

Metric 5. Special Wetland Communities

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, 

microtopography

TOTAL SCORE Category based on score 

breakpoints

Complete Wetland Categorization Worksheet.

Question 6. Bogs

12 1

-2

0

3

10

1

0
10

Wetland Categorization Worksheet 

Choices Circle one Evaluation of Categorization Result of ORAM

Did you answer "Yes" to any 

of the following questions:

Narrative Rating Nos. 2, 3, 

4, 6, 7, 8a, 9d, 10

YES

Wetland is 

categorized as a 

Category 3 wetland

NO Is quantitative rating score less than the Category 2 scoring 

threshold (excluding gray zone)? If yes, reevaluate the 

category of the wetland using the narrative criteria in OAC 

Rule 3745-1-54(C) and biological and/or functional 

assessments to determine if the wetland has been overcategorized by the ORAM

Did you answer "Yes" to any 

of the following questions:

Narrative Rating Nos. 1, 8b, 

9b, 9e, 11

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for 

possible Category 

3 status 

NO Evaluate the wetland using the 1) narrative criteria in OAC 

Rule 3745-1-54(C) and 2) the quantitative rating score. If 

the wetland is determined to be a Category 3 wetland using

either of these, it should be categorized as a Category 3 

wetland. Detailed biological and/or functional assessments 

may also be used to determine the wetland's category.

Did you answer "Yes" to 

Narrative Rating No. 5

YES

Wetland is 

categorized as a 

Category 1 wetland

NO Is quantitative rating score greater than the Category 2 

scoring threshold (including any gray zone)? If yes, 

reevaluate the category of the wetland using the narrative 

criteria in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C) and biological and/or 

functional assessments to determine if the wetland has 

been under-categorized by the ORAM

Does the quantitative score 

fall within the scoring range 

of a Category 1, 2, or 3 

wetland?

YES

Wetland is 

assigned to the 

appropriate 

category based on 

the scoring range

NO If the score of the wetland is located within the scoring 

range for a particular category, the wetland should be 

assigned to that category. In all instances however, the 

narrative criteria described in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C) can 

be used to clarify or change a categorization based on a 

quantitative score.

Does the quantitative score 

fall with the "gray zone" for 

Category 1 or 2 or Category 

2 or 3 wetlands?

YES

Wetland is 

assigned to the 

higher of the two 

categories or 

assigned to a 

category based on

detailed 

assessments and 

the narrative 

criteria

NO Rater has the option of assigning the wetland to the higher 

of the two categories or to assign a category based on the 

results of a nonrapid wetland assessment method, e.g. 

functional assessment, biological assessment, etc, and a 

consideration of the narrative criteria in OAC rule 3745-1-

54(C).

Does the wetland otherwise 

exhibit moderate OR superior

hydrologic OR habitat, OR 

recreational functions AND 

the wetland was not

categorized as a Category 2 

wetland (in the case of 

moderate functions) or a 

Category 3 wetland (in the 

case of superior functions) by 

this method?

YES

Wetland was 

undercategorized 

by this method. A 

written justification 

for recategorization 

should be provided 

on Background 

Information Form

NO

Wetland is 

assigned to 

category as 

determined 

by the 

ORAM.

A wetland may be undercategorized using this method, but 

still exhibit one or more superior functions, e.g. a wetland's 

biotic communities may be degraded by human activities, 

but the wetland may still exhibit superior hydrologic 

functions because of its type, landscape position, size, local 

or regional significance, etc. In this circumstance, the 

narrative criteria in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C)(2) and (3) are 

controlling, and the under-categorization should be 

corrected. A written justification with supporting reasons or 

information for this determination should be provided.

Final Category

Choose one Category 1 Category 2 Category 3

End of Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands.




















1

Background Information

Name: 

Date: 

Affiliation:

Address: 

Phone Number: 

e-mail address: 

Name of Wetland: 

Vegetation Communit(ies):

HGM Class(es): 

Location of Wetland: include map, address, north arrow, landmarks, distances, roads, etc. 

Lat/Long or UTM Coordinate

USGS Quad Name

County

Township

Section and Subsection 

Hydrologic Unit Code

Site Visit

National Wetland Inventory Map

Ohio Wetland Inventory Map

Soil Survey

Delineation report/map

Attached.

39.723532, -80.861922

New Martinsville

Monroe

Salem

N/A

05030201

11/08/2019

Fig. 2

Wyatt Jackson

11/08/2019

wyatt.jackson@tetratech.com

W-WJKM06

Slope

PEM
2

Name of Wetland:

Wetland Size (acres, hectares):

Sketch: Include north arrow, relationship with other surface waters, vegetation zones, etc.

Comments, Narrative Discussion, Justification of Category Changes:

Final score : Category:

W-WJKM06

0.01

See Attached.

17 1
3

Scoring Boundary Worksheet

INSTRUCTIONS. The initial step in completing the ORAM is to identify the “scoring boundaries” of the wetland 

being rated. In many instances this determination will be relatively easy and the scoring boundaries will coincide 

with the “jurisdictional boundaries.” For example, the scoring boundary of an isolated cattail marsh located in the 

middle of a farm field will likely be the same as that wetland’s jurisdictional boundaries. In other instances, 

however, the scoring boundary will not be as easily determined. Wetlands that are small or isolated from other 

surface waters often form large contiguous areas or heterogeneous complexes of wetland and upland. In separating 

wetlands for scoring purposes, the hydrologic regime of the wetland is the main criterion that should be used. 

Boundaries between contiguous or connected wetlands should be established where the volume, flow, or velocity of 

water moving through the wetland changes significantly. Areas with a high degree of hydrologic interaction should 

be scored as a single wetland. In determining a wetland’s scoring boundaries, use the guidelines in the ORAM 

Manual Section 5.0. In certain instances, it may be difficult to establish the scoring boundary for the wetland being 

rated. These problem situations include wetlands that form a patchwork on the landscape, wetlands divided by 

artificial boundaries like property fences, roads, or railroad embankments, wetlands that are contiguous with 

streams, lakes, or rivers, and estuarine or coastal wetlands. These situations are discussed below, however, it is 

recommended that Rater contact Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water, 401/Wetlands Section if there are additional 

questions or a need for further clarification of the appropriate scoring boundaries of a particular wetland.

# Steps in properly establishing scoring boundaries done? not applicable

Step 1 Identify the wetland area of interest. This may be the site of a 

proposed impact, a reference site, conservation site, etc.

Step 2 Identify the locations where there is physical evidence that hydrology 

changes rapidly. Such evidence includes both natural and humaninduced changes including, constrictions caused by berms or dikes, 

points where the water velocity changes rapidly at rapids or falls, 

points where significant inflows occur at the confluence of rivers, or 

other factors that may restrict hydrologic interaction between the 

wetlands or parts of a single wetland.

Step 3 Delineate the boundary of the wetland to be rated such that all areas 

of interest that are contiguous to and within the areas where the 

hydrology does not change significantly, i.e. areas that have a high 

degree of hydrologic interaction are included within the scoring 

boundary.

Step 4 Determine if artificial boundaries, such as property lines, state lines, 

roads, railroad embankments, etc., are present. These should not be 

used to establish scoring boundaries unless they coincide with areas 

where the hydrologic regime changes.

Step 5 In all instances, the Rater may enlarge the minimum scoring 

boundaries discussed here to score together wetlands that could be 

scored separately.

Step 6 Consult ORAM Manual Section 5.0 for how to establish scoring 

boundaries for wetlands that form a patchwork on the landscape, 

divided by artificial boundaries, contiguous to streams, lakes or rivers, 

or for dual classifications.

End of Scoring Boundary Determination. Begin Narrative Rating on next page.
4

Narrative Rating

INSTRUCTIONS. Answer each of the following questions. Questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 should be answered based on 

information obtained from the site visit or the literature and by submitting a Data Services Request to the Ohio 

Department of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Natural Heritage Data Services, 1889 

Fountain Square Court, Building F-1, Columbus, Ohio 43224, 614-265-6453 (phone), 614-265-3096 (fax),

http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/dnap . The remaining questions are designed to be answered primarily by the results of 

the site visit. Refer to the User’s Manual for descriptions of these wetland types. Note: "Critical habitat" is legally 

defined in the Endangered Species Act and is the geographic area containing physical or biological features essential 

to the conservation of a listed species or as an area that may require special management considerations or 

protection. The Rater should contact the Region 3 Headquarters or the Columbus Ecological Services Office for 

updates as to whether critical habitat has been designated for other federally listed threatened or endangered species. 

“Documented” means the wetland is listed in the appropriate State of Ohio database.

# Question Circle one

1 Critical Habitat. Is the wetland in a township, section, or subsection of 

a United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute Quadrangle that has 

been designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as "critical 

habitat" for any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? 

Note: as of January 1, 2001, of the federally listed endangered or 

threatened species which can be found in Ohio, the Indiana Bat has 

had critical habitat designated (50 CFR 17.95(a)) and the piping plover 

has had critical habitat proposed (65 FR 41812 July 6, 2000).

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 2

NO

Go to Question 2

2 Threatened or Endangered Species. Is the wetland known to contain 

an individual of, or documented occurrences of federal or state-listed 

threatened or endangered plant or animal species?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland. 

Go to Question 3

NO

Go to Question 3

3 Documented High Quality Wetland. Is the wetland on record in 

Natural Heritage Database as a high quality wetland? 

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 4

NO

Go to Question 4

4 Significant Breeding or Concentration Area. Does the wetland 

contain documented regionally significant breeding or nonbreeding 

waterfowl, neotropical songbird, or shorebird concentration areas? 

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 5

NO

Go to Question 5

5 Category 1 Wetlands. Is the wetland less than 0.5 hectares (1 acre) 

in size and hydrologically isolated and either 1) comprised of 

vegetation that is dominated (greater than eighty per cent areal cover) 

by Phalaris arundinacea, Lythrum salicaria, or Phragmites australis, or 

2) an acidic pond created or excavated on mined lands that has little or 

no vegetation?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

1 wetland 

Go to Question 6

NO

Go to Question 6

6 Bogs. Is the wetland a peat-accumulating wetland that 1) has no 

significant inflows or outflows, 2) supports acidophilic mosses, 

particularly Sphagnum spp., 3) the acidophilic mosses have >30% 

cover, 4) at least one species from Table 1 is present, and 5) the 

cover of invasive species (see Table 1) is <25%?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 7

NO

Go to Question 7

7 Fens. Is the wetland a carbon accumulating (peat, muck) wetland that 

is saturated during most of the year, primarily by a discharge of free 

flowing, mineral rich, ground water with a circumneutral ph (5.5-9.0) 

and with one or more plant species listed in Table 1 and the cover of 

invasive species listed in Table 1 is <25%?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 8a

NO

Go to Question 8a

8a "Old Growth Forest." Is the wetland a forested wetland and is the 

forest characterized by, but not limited to, the following characteristics: 

overstory canopy trees of great age (exceeding at least 50% of a 

projected maximum attainable age for a species); little or no evidence 

of human-caused understory disturbance during the past 80 to 100 

years; an all-aged structure and multilayered canopies; aggregations of 

canopy trees interspersed with canopy gaps; and significant numbers 

of standing dead snags and downed logs?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland. 

Go to Question 8b

NO

Go to Question 8b
5

8b Mature forested wetlands. Is the wetland a forested wetland with 

50% or more of the cover of upper forest canopy consisting of 

deciduous trees with large diameters at breast height (dbh), generally 

diameters greater than 45cm (17.7in) dbh?

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status. 

Go to Question 9a

NO

Go to Question 9a

9a Lake Erie coastal and tributary wetlands. Is the wetland located at 

an elevation less than 575 feet on the USGS map, adjacent to this 

elevation, or along a tributary to Lake Erie that is accessible to fish?

YES

Go to Question 9b

NO

Go to Question 10

9b Does the wetland's hydrology result from measures designed to 

prevent erosion and the loss of aquatic plants, i.e. the wetland is 

partially hydrologically restricted from Lake Erie due to lakeward or 

landward dikes or other hydrological controls? 

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 9c

9c Are Lake Erie water levels the wetland's primary hydrological influence, 

i.e. the wetland is hydrologically unrestricted (no lakeward or upland 

border alterations), or the wetland can be characterized as an 

"estuarine" wetland with lake and river influenced hydrology. These 

include sandbar deposition wetlands, estuarine wetlands, river mouth 

wetlands, or those dominated by submersed aquatic vegetation.

YES

Go to Question 9d 

NO

Go to Question 10

9d Does the wetland have a predominance of native species within its 

vegetation communities, although non-native or disturbance tolerant 

native species can also be present?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 9e

9e Does the wetland have a predominance of non-native or disturbance 

tolerant native plant species within its vegetation communities?

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 10

10 Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) Is the wetland located in 

Lucas, Fulton, Henry, or Wood Counties and can the wetland be 

characterized by the following description: the wetland has a sandy 

substrate with interspersed organic matter, a water table often within 

several inches of the surface, and often with a dominance of the 

gramineous vegetation listed in Table 1 (woody species may also be 

present). The Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of 

Natural Areas and Preserves can provide assistance in confirming this 

type of wetland and its quality.

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland.

Go to Question 11

NO

Go to Question 11

11 Relict Wet Prairies. Is the wetland a relict wet prairie community 

dominated by some or all of the species in Table 1. Extensive prairies 

were formerly located in the Darby Plains (Madison and Union 

Counties), Sandusky Plains (Wyandot, Crawford, and Marion 

Counties), northwest Ohio (e.g. Erie, Huron, Lucas, Wood Counties),

and portions of western Ohio Counties (e.g. Darke, Mercer, Miami, 

Montgomery, Van Wert etc.).

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Complete Quantitative

Rating

NO

Complete 

Quantitative

Rating
6

Table 1. Characteristic plant species.

invasive/exotic spp fen species bog species 0ak Opening species wet prairie species

Lythrum salicaria

Myriophyllum spicatum 

Najas minor 

Phalaris arundinacea

Phragmites australis 

Potamogeton crispus

Ranunculus ficaria 

Rhamnus frangula

Typha angustifolia 

Typha xglauca

Zygadenus elegans var. glaucus 

Cacalia plantaginea 

Carex flava

Carex sterilis 

Carex stricta

Deschampsia caespitosa

Eleocharis rostellata

Eriophorum viridicarinatum 

Gentianopsis spp.

Lobelia kalmii

Parnassia glauca

Potentilla fruticosa

Rhamnus alnifolia 

Rhynchospora capillacea

Salix candida

Salix myricoides

Salix serissima

Solidago ohioensis 

Tofieldia glutinosa 

Triglochin maritimum 

Triglochin palustre

Calla palustris 

Carex atlantica var. capillacea

Carex echinata

Carex oligosperma

Carex trisperma

Chamaedaphne calyculata 

Decodon verticillatus 

Eriophorum virginicum 

Larix laricina 

Nemopanthus mucronatus 

Schechzeria palustris

Sphagnum spp. 

Vaccinium macrocarpon

Vaccinium corymbosum

Vaccinium oxycoccos

Woodwardia virginica 

Xyris difformis 

Carex cryptolepis

Carex lasiocarpa

Carex stricta

Cladium mariscoides

Calamagrostis stricta

Calamagrostis canadensis

Quercus palustris

Calamagrostis canadensis

Calamogrostis stricta

Carex atherodes

Carex buxbaumii

Carex pellita

Carex sartwellii

Gentiana andrewsii

Helianthus grosseserratus

Liatris spicata

Lysimachia quadriflora

Lythrum alatum

Pycnanthemum virginianum

Silphium terebinthinaceum

Sorghastrum nutans

Spartina pectinata

Solidago riddellii

End of Narrative Rating. Begin Quantitative Rating on next page.
7

ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rater(s): Date:

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size).

max 6 pts. subtotal Select one size class and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts)

25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts)

10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts)

3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts)

0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts)

0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt)

<0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use.

max 14 pts. subtotal 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check.

WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7)

MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4)

NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1)

VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average.

VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7)

LOW. Old field (>10 years), shrub land, young second growth forest. (5)

MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pasture, park, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3)

HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology.

max 30 pts. subtotal 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply. 3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) 100 year floodplain (1)

Other groundwater (3) Between stream/lake and other human use (1)

Precipitation (1) Part of wetland/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1)

Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check.

3c. Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score. Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4)

>0.7 (27.6in) (3) Regularly inundated/saturated (3)

0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) Seasonally inundated (2)

<0.4m (<15.7in) (1) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (12) Check all disturbances observed

Recovered (7) ditch point source (nonstormwater)

Recovering (3) tile filling/grading

Recent or no recovery (1) dike road bed/RR track

weir dredging

stormwater input other_____________________

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development.

max 20 pts. subtotal 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (4)

Recovered (3)

Recovering (2)

Recent or no recovery (1)

4b. Habitat development. Select only one and assign score.

Excellent (7)

Very good (6)

Good (5)

Moderately good (4)

Fair (3)

Poor to fair (2)

Poor (1)

4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average. 

None or none apparent (9) Check all disturbances observed

Recovered (6) mowing shrub/sapling removal

Recovering (3) grazing herbaceous/aquatic bed removal

Recent or no recovery (1) clearcutting sedimentation

selective cutting dredging

woody debris removal farming

toxic pollutants nutrient enrichment

subtotal this page

last revised 1 February 2001 jjm

Between stream/lake and other human use (1)

W-WJKM06 Wyatt Jackson 11/08/2019

0

3 3

7 10

5 15

15
8

ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rater(s): Date:

subtotal first page

Metric 5. Special Wetlands.

max 10 pts. subtotal Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Old growth forest (10)

Mature forested wetland (5)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-unrestricted hydrology (10)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-restricted hydrology (5)

Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10)

Relict Wet Prairies (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10)

Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10)

Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography.

max 20 pts. subtotal 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities. Vegetation Community Cover Scale

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. 0 Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area

Aquatic bed 1 Present and either comprises small part of wetland's

Emergent vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a 

Shrub significant part but is of low quality

Forest 2 Present and either comprises significant part of wetland's 

Mudflats vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small 

Open water part and is of high quality

Other__________________ 3 Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. vegetation and is of high quality

Select only one.

High (5) Narrative Description of Vegetation Quality

Moderately high(4) low Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or

Moderate (3) disturbance tolerant native species

Moderately low (2) mod Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation,

Low (1) although nonnative and/or disturbance tolerant native spp

None (0) can also be present, and species diversity moderate to 

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer moderately high, but generally w/o presence of rare

to Table 1 ORAM long form for list. Add threatened or endangered spp

or deduct points for coverage high A predominance of native species, with nonnative spp

Extensive >75% cover (-5) and/or disturbance tolerant native spp absent or virtually

Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always,

Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

Nearly absent <5% cover (0)

Absent (1) Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality

6d. Microtopography. 0 Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres)

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. 1 Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)

Vegetated hummucks/tussucks 2 Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres)

Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in) 3 High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Standing dead >25cm (10in) dbh

Amphibian breeding pools Microtopography Cover Scale

0 Absent

1 Present very small amounts or if more common

 of marginal quality

2 Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest

 quality or in small amounts of highest quality

3 Present in moderate or greater amounts

 and of highest quality

End of Quantitative Rating. Complete Categorization Worksheets.

W-WJKM06 Wyatt Jackson 11/08/2019

15

0 15

2 17

17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
9

ORAM Summary Worksheet 

circle 

answer or 

insert 

score

Result

Narrative Rating Question 1 Critical Habitat YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 2. Threatened or Endangered 

Species

YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 3. High Quality Natural Wetland YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 4. Significant bird habitat YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 5. Category 1 Wetlands YES NO If yes, Category 1.

Question 6. Bogs YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 7. Fens YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 8a. Old Growth Forest YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 8b. Mature Forested Wetland YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 9b. Lake Erie Wetlands -

Restricted

YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 9d. Lake Erie Wetlands –

Unrestricted with native plants

YES NO If yes, Category 3

Question 9e. Lake Erie Wetlands -

Unrestricted with invasive plants

YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 10. Oak Openings YES NO If yes, Category 3

Question 11. Relict Wet Prairies YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be

1 or 2.

Quantitative 

Rating

Metric 1. Size

Metric 2. Buffers and surrounding land use

Metric 3. Hydrology

Metric 4. Habitat

Metric 5. Special Wetland Communities

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, 

microtopography

TOTAL SCORE Category based on score 

breakpoints

Complete Wetland Categorization Worksheet.

Question 6. Bogs

17 1

2

0

5

7

3

0
10

Wetland Categorization Worksheet 

Choices Circle one Evaluation of Categorization Result of ORAM

Did you answer "Yes" to any 

of the following questions:

Narrative Rating Nos. 2, 3, 

4, 6, 7, 8a, 9d, 10

YES

Wetland is 

categorized as a 

Category 3 wetland

NO Is quantitative rating score less than the Category 2 scoring 

threshold (excluding gray zone)? If yes, reevaluate the 

category of the wetland using the narrative criteria in OAC 

Rule 3745-1-54(C) and biological and/or functional 

assessments to determine if the wetland has been overcategorized by the ORAM

Did you answer "Yes" to any 

of the following questions:

Narrative Rating Nos. 1, 8b, 

9b, 9e, 11

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for 

possible Category 

3 status 

NO Evaluate the wetland using the 1) narrative criteria in OAC 

Rule 3745-1-54(C) and 2) the quantitative rating score. If 

the wetland is determined to be a Category 3 wetland using

either of these, it should be categorized as a Category 3 

wetland. Detailed biological and/or functional assessments 

may also be used to determine the wetland's category.

Did you answer "Yes" to 

Narrative Rating No. 5

YES

Wetland is 

categorized as a 

Category 1 wetland

NO Is quantitative rating score greater than the Category 2 

scoring threshold (including any gray zone)? If yes, 

reevaluate the category of the wetland using the narrative 

criteria in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C) and biological and/or 

functional assessments to determine if the wetland has 

been under-categorized by the ORAM

Does the quantitative score 

fall within the scoring range 

of a Category 1, 2, or 3 

wetland?

YES

Wetland is 

assigned to the 

appropriate 

category based on 

the scoring range

NO If the score of the wetland is located within the scoring 

range for a particular category, the wetland should be 

assigned to that category. In all instances however, the 

narrative criteria described in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C) can 

be used to clarify or change a categorization based on a 

quantitative score.

Does the quantitative score 

fall with the "gray zone" for 

Category 1 or 2 or Category 

2 or 3 wetlands?

YES

Wetland is 

assigned to the 

higher of the two 

categories or 

assigned to a 

category based on

detailed 

assessments and 

the narrative 

criteria

NO Rater has the option of assigning the wetland to the higher 

of the two categories or to assign a category based on the 

results of a nonrapid wetland assessment method, e.g. 

functional assessment, biological assessment, etc, and a 

consideration of the narrative criteria in OAC rule 3745-1-

54(C).

Does the wetland otherwise 

exhibit moderate OR superior

hydrologic OR habitat, OR 

recreational functions AND 

the wetland was not

categorized as a Category 2 

wetland (in the case of 

moderate functions) or a 

Category 3 wetland (in the 

case of superior functions) by 

this method?

YES

Wetland was 

undercategorized 

by this method. A 

written justification 

for recategorization 

should be provided 

on Background 

Information Form

NO

Wetland is 

assigned to 

category as 

determined 

by the 

ORAM.

A wetland may be undercategorized using this method, but 

still exhibit one or more superior functions, e.g. a wetland's 

biotic communities may be degraded by human activities, 

but the wetland may still exhibit superior hydrologic 

functions because of its type, landscape position, size, local 

or regional significance, etc. In this circumstance, the 

narrative criteria in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C)(2) and (3) are 

controlling, and the under-categorization should be 

corrected. A written justification with supporting reasons or 

information for this determination should be provided.

Final Category

Choose one Category 1 Category 2 Category 3

End of Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands.
1

Background Information

Name: 

Date: 

Affiliation:

Address: 

Phone Number: 

e-mail address: 

Name of Wetland: 

Vegetation Communit(ies):

HGM Class(es): 

Location of Wetland: include map, address, north arrow, landmarks, distances, roads, etc. 

Lat/Long or UTM Coordinate

USGS Quad Name

County

Township

Section and Subsection 

Hydrologic Unit Code

Site Visit

National Wetland Inventory Map

Ohio Wetland Inventory Map

Soil Survey

Delineation report/map

Attached.

W-KP01-PEM - 39.718866, -80.860365; W-KP01-PFO - 39.719473, -80.860698; W-KP02 -

39.721523, -80.861126; W-KP03 - 39.723063, -80.861765; W-KP04 - 39.722894, -80.862194.

New Martinsville

Monroe

Salem

N/A

05030201

11/11/2019

Fig. 2

Kevin Pulver

11/11/2019

kevin.pulver@tetratech.com

W-KP01-PEM, W-KP01-PFO, W-KP02, W-KP03, W-KP04

Riverine Slope Slope

PFO PEM PEM PEM

Slope
2

Name of Wetland:

Wetland Size (acres, hectares):

Sketch: Include north arrow, relationship with other surface waters, vegetation zones, etc.

Comments, Narrative Discussion, Justification of Category Changes:

Final score : Category:

W-KP01-PEM, W-KP01-PFO, W-KP02, W-KP03, W-KP04

1.18 ac.

See Attached.

W-KP01 is a PFO/PEM wetland complex; W-KP01 - W-KP04 are situated on historically strip mined CNX

property.

29 1
3

Scoring Boundary Worksheet

INSTRUCTIONS. The initial step in completing the ORAM is to identify the “scoring boundaries” of the wetland 

being rated. In many instances this determination will be relatively easy and the scoring boundaries will coincide 

with the “jurisdictional boundaries.” For example, the scoring boundary of an isolated cattail marsh located in the 

middle of a farm field will likely be the same as that wetland’s jurisdictional boundaries. In other instances, 

however, the scoring boundary will not be as easily determined. Wetlands that are small or isolated from other 

surface waters often form large contiguous areas or heterogeneous complexes of wetland and upland. In separating 

wetlands for scoring purposes, the hydrologic regime of the wetland is the main criterion that should be used. 

Boundaries between contiguous or connected wetlands should be established where the volume, flow, or velocity of 

water moving through the wetland changes significantly. Areas with a high degree of hydrologic interaction should 

be scored as a single wetland. In determining a wetland’s scoring boundaries, use the guidelines in the ORAM 

Manual Section 5.0. In certain instances, it may be difficult to establish the scoring boundary for the wetland being 

rated. These problem situations include wetlands that form a patchwork on the landscape, wetlands divided by 

artificial boundaries like property fences, roads, or railroad embankments, wetlands that are contiguous with 

streams, lakes, or rivers, and estuarine or coastal wetlands. These situations are discussed below, however, it is 

recommended that Rater contact Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water, 401/Wetlands Section if there are additional 

questions or a need for further clarification of the appropriate scoring boundaries of a particular wetland.

# Steps in properly establishing scoring boundaries done? not applicable

Step 1 Identify the wetland area of interest. This may be the site of a 

proposed impact, a reference site, conservation site, etc.

Step 2 Identify the locations where there is physical evidence that hydrology 

changes rapidly. Such evidence includes both natural and humaninduced changes including, constrictions caused by berms or dikes, 

points where the water velocity changes rapidly at rapids or falls, 

points where significant inflows occur at the confluence of rivers, or 

other factors that may restrict hydrologic interaction between the 

wetlands or parts of a single wetland.

Step 3 Delineate the boundary of the wetland to be rated such that all areas 

of interest that are contiguous to and within the areas where the 

hydrology does not change significantly, i.e. areas that have a high 

degree of hydrologic interaction are included within the scoring 

boundary.

Step 4 Determine if artificial boundaries, such as property lines, state lines, 

roads, railroad embankments, etc., are present. These should not be 

used to establish scoring boundaries unless they coincide with areas 

where the hydrologic regime changes.

Step 5 In all instances, the Rater may enlarge the minimum scoring 

boundaries discussed here to score together wetlands that could be 

scored separately.

Step 6 Consult ORAM Manual Section 5.0 for how to establish scoring 

boundaries for wetlands that form a patchwork on the landscape, 

divided by artificial boundaries, contiguous to streams, lakes or rivers, 

or for dual classifications.

End of Scoring Boundary Determination. Begin Narrative Rating on next page.
4

Narrative Rating

INSTRUCTIONS. Answer each of the following questions. Questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 should be answered based on 

information obtained from the site visit or the literature and by submitting a Data Services Request to the Ohio 

Department of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Natural Heritage Data Services, 1889 

Fountain Square Court, Building F-1, Columbus, Ohio 43224, 614-265-6453 (phone), 614-265-3096 (fax),

http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/dnap . The remaining questions are designed to be answered primarily by the results of 

the site visit. Refer to the User’s Manual for descriptions of these wetland types. Note: "Critical habitat" is legally 

defined in the Endangered Species Act and is the geographic area containing physical or biological features essential 

to the conservation of a listed species or as an area that may require special management considerations or 

protection. The Rater should contact the Region 3 Headquarters or the Columbus Ecological Services Office for 

updates as to whether critical habitat has been designated for other federally listed threatened or endangered species. 

“Documented” means the wetland is listed in the appropriate State of Ohio database.

# Question Circle one

1 Critical Habitat. Is the wetland in a township, section, or subsection of 

a United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute Quadrangle that has 

been designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as "critical 

habitat" for any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? 

Note: as of January 1, 2001, of the federally listed endangered or 

threatened species which can be found in Ohio, the Indiana Bat has 

had critical habitat designated (50 CFR 17.95(a)) and the piping plover 

has had critical habitat proposed (65 FR 41812 July 6, 2000).

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 2

NO

Go to Question 2

2 Threatened or Endangered Species. Is the wetland known to contain 

an individual of, or documented occurrences of federal or state-listed 

threatened or endangered plant or animal species?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland. 

Go to Question 3

NO

Go to Question 3

3 Documented High Quality Wetland. Is the wetland on record in 

Natural Heritage Database as a high quality wetland? 

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 4

NO

Go to Question 4

4 Significant Breeding or Concentration Area. Does the wetland 

contain documented regionally significant breeding or nonbreeding 

waterfowl, neotropical songbird, or shorebird concentration areas? 

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 5

NO

Go to Question 5

5 Category 1 Wetlands. Is the wetland less than 0.5 hectares (1 acre) 

in size and hydrologically isolated and either 1) comprised of 

vegetation that is dominated (greater than eighty per cent areal cover) 

by Phalaris arundinacea, Lythrum salicaria, or Phragmites australis, or 

2) an acidic pond created or excavated on mined lands that has little or 

no vegetation?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

1 wetland 

Go to Question 6

NO

Go to Question 6

6 Bogs. Is the wetland a peat-accumulating wetland that 1) has no 

significant inflows or outflows, 2) supports acidophilic mosses, 

particularly Sphagnum spp., 3) the acidophilic mosses have >30% 

cover, 4) at least one species from Table 1 is present, and 5) the 

cover of invasive species (see Table 1) is <25%?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 7

NO

Go to Question 7

7 Fens. Is the wetland a carbon accumulating (peat, muck) wetland that 

is saturated during most of the year, primarily by a discharge of free 

flowing, mineral rich, ground water with a circumneutral ph (5.5-9.0) 

and with one or more plant species listed in Table 1 and the cover of 

invasive species listed in Table 1 is <25%?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 8a

NO

Go to Question 8a

8a "Old Growth Forest." Is the wetland a forested wetland and is the 

forest characterized by, but not limited to, the following characteristics: 

overstory canopy trees of great age (exceeding at least 50% of a 

projected maximum attainable age for a species); little or no evidence 

of human-caused understory disturbance during the past 80 to 100 

years; an all-aged structure and multilayered canopies; aggregations of 

canopy trees interspersed with canopy gaps; and significant numbers 

of standing dead snags and downed logs?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland. 

Go to Question 8b

NO

Go to Question 8b
5

8b Mature forested wetlands. Is the wetland a forested wetland with 

50% or more of the cover of upper forest canopy consisting of 

deciduous trees with large diameters at breast height (dbh), generally 

diameters greater than 45cm (17.7in) dbh?

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status. 

Go to Question 9a

NO

Go to Question 9a

9a Lake Erie coastal and tributary wetlands. Is the wetland located at 

an elevation less than 575 feet on the USGS map, adjacent to this 

elevation, or along a tributary to Lake Erie that is accessible to fish?

YES

Go to Question 9b

NO

Go to Question 10

9b Does the wetland's hydrology result from measures designed to 

prevent erosion and the loss of aquatic plants, i.e. the wetland is 

partially hydrologically restricted from Lake Erie due to lakeward or 

landward dikes or other hydrological controls? 

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 9c

9c Are Lake Erie water levels the wetland's primary hydrological influence, 

i.e. the wetland is hydrologically unrestricted (no lakeward or upland 

border alterations), or the wetland can be characterized as an 

"estuarine" wetland with lake and river influenced hydrology. These 

include sandbar deposition wetlands, estuarine wetlands, river mouth 

wetlands, or those dominated by submersed aquatic vegetation.

YES

Go to Question 9d 

NO

Go to Question 10

9d Does the wetland have a predominance of native species within its 

vegetation communities, although non-native or disturbance tolerant 

native species can also be present?

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 9e

9e Does the wetland have a predominance of non-native or disturbance 

tolerant native plant species within its vegetation communities?

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Go to Question 10

NO

Go to Question 10

10 Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) Is the wetland located in 

Lucas, Fulton, Henry, or Wood Counties and can the wetland be 

characterized by the following description: the wetland has a sandy 

substrate with interspersed organic matter, a water table often within 

several inches of the surface, and often with a dominance of the 

gramineous vegetation listed in Table 1 (woody species may also be 

present). The Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of 

Natural Areas and Preserves can provide assistance in confirming this 

type of wetland and its quality.

YES

Wetland is a Category 

3 wetland.

Go to Question 11

NO

Go to Question 11

11 Relict Wet Prairies. Is the wetland a relict wet prairie community 

dominated by some or all of the species in Table 1. Extensive prairies 

were formerly located in the Darby Plains (Madison and Union 

Counties), Sandusky Plains (Wyandot, Crawford, and Marion 

Counties), northwest Ohio (e.g. Erie, Huron, Lucas, Wood Counties),

and portions of western Ohio Counties (e.g. Darke, Mercer, Miami, 

Montgomery, Van Wert etc.).

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for possible 

Category 3 status

Complete Quantitative

Rating

NO

Complete 

Quantitative

Rating
6

Table 1. Characteristic plant species.

invasive/exotic spp fen species bog species 0ak Opening species wet prairie species

Lythrum salicaria

Myriophyllum spicatum 

Najas minor 

Phalaris arundinacea

Phragmites australis 

Potamogeton crispus

Ranunculus ficaria 

Rhamnus frangula

Typha angustifolia 

Typha xglauca

Zygadenus elegans var. glaucus 

Cacalia plantaginea 

Carex flava

Carex sterilis 

Carex stricta

Deschampsia caespitosa

Eleocharis rostellata

Eriophorum viridicarinatum 

Gentianopsis spp.

Lobelia kalmii

Parnassia glauca

Potentilla fruticosa

Rhamnus alnifolia 

Rhynchospora capillacea

Salix candida

Salix myricoides

Salix serissima

Solidago ohioensis 

Tofieldia glutinosa 

Triglochin maritimum 

Triglochin palustre

Calla palustris 

Carex atlantica var. capillacea

Carex echinata

Carex oligosperma

Carex trisperma

Chamaedaphne calyculata 

Decodon verticillatus 

Eriophorum virginicum 

Larix laricina 

Nemopanthus mucronatus 

Schechzeria palustris

Sphagnum spp. 

Vaccinium macrocarpon

Vaccinium corymbosum

Vaccinium oxycoccos

Woodwardia virginica 

Xyris difformis 

Carex cryptolepis

Carex lasiocarpa

Carex stricta

Cladium mariscoides

Calamagrostis stricta

Calamagrostis canadensis

Quercus palustris

Calamagrostis canadensis

Calamogrostis stricta

Carex atherodes

Carex buxbaumii

Carex pellita

Carex sartwellii

Gentiana andrewsii

Helianthus grosseserratus

Liatris spicata

Lysimachia quadriflora

Lythrum alatum

Pycnanthemum virginianum

Silphium terebinthinaceum

Sorghastrum nutans

Spartina pectinata

Solidago riddellii

End of Narrative Rating. Begin Quantitative Rating on next page.
7

ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rater(s): Date:

Metric 1. Wetland Area (size).

max 6 pts. subtotal Select one size class and assign score.

>50 acres (>20.2ha) (6 pts)

25 to <50 acres (10.1 to <20.2ha) (5 pts)

10 to <25 acres (4 to <10.1ha) (4 pts)

3 to <10 acres (1.2 to <4ha) (3 pts)

0.3 to <3 acres (0.12 to <1.2ha) (2pts)

0.1 to <0.3 acres (0.04 to <0.12ha) (1 pt)

<0.1 acres (0.04ha) (0 pts)

Metric 2. Upland buffers and surrounding land use.

max 14 pts. subtotal 2a. Calculate average buffer width. Select only one and assign score. Do not double check.

WIDE. Buffers average 50m (164ft) or more around wetland perimeter (7)

MEDIUM. Buffers average 25m to <50m (82 to <164ft) around wetland perimeter (4)

NARROW. Buffers average 10m to <25m (32ft to <82ft) around wetland perimeter (1)

VERY NARROW. Buffers average <10m (<32ft) around wetland perimeter (0)

2b. Intensity of surrounding land use. Select one or double check and average.

VERY LOW. 2nd growth or older forest, prairie, savannah, wildlife area, etc. (7)

LOW. Old field (>10 years), shrub land, young second growth forest. (5)

MODERATELY HIGH. Residential, fenced pasture, park, conservation tillage, new fallow field. (3)

HIGH. Urban, industrial, open pasture, row cropping, mining, construction. (1)

Metric 3. Hydrology.

max 30 pts. subtotal 3a. Sources of Water. Score all that apply. 3b. Connectivity. Score all that apply.

High pH groundwater (5) 100 year floodplain (1)

Other groundwater (3) Between stream/lake and other human use (1)

Precipitation (1) Part of wetland/upland (e.g. forest), complex (1)

Seasonal/Intermittent surface water (3) Part of riparian or upland corridor (1)

Perennial surface water (lake or stream) (5) 3d. Duration inundation/saturation. Score one or dbl check.

3c. Maximum water depth. Select only one and assign score. Semi- to permanently inundated/saturated (4)

>0.7 (27.6in) (3) Regularly inundated/saturated (3)

0.4 to 0.7m (15.7 to 27.6in) (2) Seasonally inundated (2)

<0.4m (<15.7in) (1) Seasonally saturated in upper 30cm (12in) (1)

3e. Modifications to natural hydrologic regime. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (12) Check all disturbances observed

Recovered (7) ditch point source (nonstormwater)

Recovering (3) tile filling/grading

Recent or no recovery (1) dike road bed/RR track

weir dredging

stormwater input other_____________________

Metric 4. Habitat Alteration and Development.

max 20 pts. subtotal 4a. Substrate disturbance. Score one or double check and average.

None or none apparent (4)

Recovered (3)

Recovering (2)

Recent or no recovery (1)

4b. Habitat development. Select only one and assign score.

Excellent (7)

Very good (6)

Good (5)

Moderately good (4)

Fair (3)

Poor to fair (2)

Poor (1)

4c. Habitat alteration. Score one or double check and average. 

None or none apparent (9) Check all disturbances observed

Recovered (6) mowing shrub/sapling removal

Recovering (3) grazing herbaceous/aquatic bed removal

Recent or no recovery (1) clearcutting sedimentation

selective cutting dredging

woody debris removal farming

toxic pollutants nutrient enrichment

subtotal this page

last revised 1 February 2001 jjm

Between stream/lake and other human use (1)

W-KP01-PEM, W-KP01-PFO, W-KP02, W-KP03, W-KP04 Kevin Pulver 11/11/2019

6 32

32
8

ORAM v. 5.0 Field Form Quantitative Rating

Site: Rater(s): Date:

subtotal first page

Metric 5. Special Wetlands.

max 10 pts. subtotal Check all that apply and score as indicated.

Bog (10)

Fen (10)

Old growth forest (10)

Mature forested wetland (5)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-unrestricted hydrology (10)

Lake Erie coastal/tributary wetland-restricted hydrology (5)

Lake Plain Sand Prairies (Oak Openings) (10)

Relict Wet Prairies (10)

Known occurrence state/federal threatened or endangered species (10)

Significant migratory songbird/water fowl habitat or usage (10)

Category 1 Wetland. See Question 1 Qualitative Rating (-10)

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, microtopography.

max 20 pts. subtotal 6a. Wetland Vegetation Communities. Vegetation Community Cover Scale

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. 0 Absent or comprises <0.1ha (0.2471 acres) contiguous area

Aquatic bed 1 Present and either comprises small part of wetland's

Emergent vegetation and is of moderate quality, or comprises a 

Shrub significant part but is of low quality

Forest 2 Present and either comprises significant part of wetland's 

Mudflats vegetation and is of moderate quality or comprises a small 

Open water part and is of high quality

Other__________________ 3 Present and comprises significant part, or more, of wetland's

6b. horizontal (plan view) Interspersion. vegetation and is of high quality

Select only one.

High (5) Narrative Description of Vegetation Quality

Moderately high(4) low Low spp diversity and/or predominance of nonnative or

Moderate (3) disturbance tolerant native species

Moderately low (2) mod Native spp are dominant component of the vegetation,

Low (1) although nonnative and/or disturbance tolerant native spp

None (0) can also be present, and species diversity moderate to 

6c. Coverage of invasive plants. Refer moderately high, but generally w/o presence of rare

to Table 1 ORAM long form for list. Add threatened or endangered spp

or deduct points for coverage high A predominance of native species, with nonnative spp

Extensive >75% cover (-5) and/or disturbance tolerant native spp absent or virtually

Moderate 25-75% cover (-3) absent, and high spp diversity and often, but not always,

Sparse 5-25% cover (-1) the presence of rare, threatened, or endangered spp

Nearly absent <5% cover (0)

Absent (1) Mudflat and Open Water Class Quality

6d. Microtopography. 0 Absent <0.1ha (0.247 acres)

Score all present using 0 to 3 scale. 1 Low 0.1 to <1ha (0.247 to 2.47 acres)

Vegetated hummucks/tussucks 2 Moderate 1 to <4ha (2.47 to 9.88 acres)

Coarse woody debris >15cm (6in) 3 High 4ha (9.88 acres) or more

Standing dead >25cm (10in) dbh

Amphibian breeding pools Microtopography Cover Scale

0 Absent

1 Present very small amounts or if more common

 of marginal quality

2 Present in moderate amounts, but not of highest

 quality or in small amounts of highest quality

3 Present in moderate or greater amounts

 and of highest quality

End of Quantitative Rating. Complete Categorization Worksheets.

W-KP01-PEM, W-KP01-PFO, W-KP02, W-KP03, W-KP04 Kevin Pulver 11/11/2019

32

32

-3 29

29

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
9

ORAM Summary Worksheet 

circle 

answer or 

insert 

score

Result

Narrative Rating Question 1 Critical Habitat YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 2. Threatened or Endangered 

Species

YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 3. High Quality Natural Wetland YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 4. Significant bird habitat YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 5. Category 1 Wetlands YES NO If yes, Category 1.

Question 6. Bogs YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 7. Fens YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 8a. Old Growth Forest YES NO If yes, Category 3.

Question 8b. Mature Forested Wetland YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 9b. Lake Erie Wetlands -

Restricted

YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 9d. Lake Erie Wetlands –

Unrestricted with native plants

YES NO If yes, Category 3

Question 9e. Lake Erie Wetlands -

Unrestricted with invasive plants

YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be 

1 or 2.

Question 10. Oak Openings YES NO If yes, Category 3

Question 11. Relict Wet Prairies YES NO If yes, evaluate for 

Category 3; may also be

1 or 2.

Quantitative 

Rating

Metric 1. Size

Metric 2. Buffers and surrounding land use

Metric 3. Hydrology

Metric 4. Habitat

Metric 5. Special Wetland Communities

Metric 6. Plant communities, interspersion, 

microtopography

TOTAL SCORE Category based on score 

breakpoints

Complete Wetland Categorization Worksheet.

Question 6. Bogs

29 1

-3

6
10

Wetland Categorization Worksheet 

Choices Circle one Evaluation of Categorization Result of ORAM

Did you answer "Yes" to any 

of the following questions:

Narrative Rating Nos. 2, 3, 

4, 6, 7, 8a, 9d, 10

YES

Wetland is 

categorized as a 

Category 3 wetland

NO Is quantitative rating score less than the Category 2 scoring 

threshold (excluding gray zone)? If yes, reevaluate the 

category of the wetland using the narrative criteria in OAC 

Rule 3745-1-54(C) and biological and/or functional 

assessments to determine if the wetland has been overcategorized by the ORAM

Did you answer "Yes" to any 

of the following questions:

Narrative Rating Nos. 1, 8b, 

9b, 9e, 11

YES

Wetland should be 

evaluated for 

possible Category 

3 status 

NO Evaluate the wetland using the 1) narrative criteria in OAC 

Rule 3745-1-54(C) and 2) the quantitative rating score. If 

the wetland is determined to be a Category 3 wetland using

either of these, it should be categorized as a Category 3 

wetland. Detailed biological and/or functional assessments 

may also be used to determine the wetland's category.

Did you answer "Yes" to 

Narrative Rating No. 5

YES

Wetland is 

categorized as a 

Category 1 wetland

NO Is quantitative rating score greater than the Category 2 

scoring threshold (including any gray zone)? If yes, 

reevaluate the category of the wetland using the narrative 

criteria in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C) and biological and/or 

functional assessments to determine if the wetland has 

been under-categorized by the ORAM

Does the quantitative score 

fall within the scoring range 

of a Category 1, 2, or 3 

wetland?

YES

Wetland is 

assigned to the 

appropriate 

category based on 

the scoring range

NO If the score of the wetland is located within the scoring 

range for a particular category, the wetland should be 

assigned to that category. In all instances however, the 

narrative criteria described in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C) can 

be used to clarify or change a categorization based on a 

quantitative score.

Does the quantitative score 

fall with the "gray zone" for 

Category 1 or 2 or Category 

2 or 3 wetlands?

YES

Wetland is 

assigned to the 

higher of the two 

categories or 

assigned to a 

category based on

detailed 

assessments and 

the narrative 

criteria

NO Rater has the option of assigning the wetland to the higher 

of the two categories or to assign a category based on the 

results of a nonrapid wetland assessment method, e.g. 

functional assessment, biological assessment, etc, and a 

consideration of the narrative criteria in OAC rule 3745-1-

54(C).

Does the wetland otherwise 

exhibit moderate OR superior

hydrologic OR habitat, OR 

recreational functions AND 

the wetland was not

categorized as a Category 2 

wetland (in the case of 

moderate functions) or a 

Category 3 wetland (in the 

case of superior functions) by 

this method?

YES

Wetland was 

undercategorized 

by this method. A 

written justification 

for recategorization 

should be provided 

on Background 

Information Form

NO

Wetland is 

assigned to 

category as 

determined 

by the 

ORAM.

A wetland may be undercategorized using this method, but 

still exhibit one or more superior functions, e.g. a wetland's 

biotic communities may be degraded by human activities, 

but the wetland may still exhibit superior hydrologic 

functions because of its type, landscape position, size, local 

or regional significance, etc. In this circumstance, the 

narrative criteria in OAC Rule 3745-1-54(C)(2) and (3) are 

controlling, and the under-categorization should be 

corrected. A written justification with supporting reasons or 

information for this determination should be provided.

Final Category

Choose one Category 1 Category 2 Category 3

End of Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands.




















APPENDIX D: RESUMES 
Korey M. McCluskey

Environmental Scientist IV

Résumé 1 

EXPERIENCE SUMMARY 

Mr. Korey McCluskey is a wetland/environmental scientist with 11+ 

years of experience in wetland delineation, stream evaluation, State 

and Federal rare, threatened & endangered (SOSC) botanical 

surveying and assessment, and construction monitoring throughout 

Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, New Jersey and New York. Korey 

has performed hundreds of wetland delineations and stream 

evaluations as well as conducted numerous botanical surveys, habitat 

assessments, and related report generation. Korey is on the USFWS 

short list of qualified surveyors for the federally listed Running Buffalo 

Clover, Small Whorled Pogonia, and Virginia Spirea in West Virginia. 

He has provided environmental consultation to clients in the 

commercial Oil and Gas, residential development, and public utility 

sectors to ensure compliance with local, state, and federal 

environmental regulations and ordinances through the environmental 

permitting process, including minimization of impacts to aquatic and 

terrestrial resources. This permitting, documentation, and guidance 

includes the preparation of wetland delineation and stream evaluation 

reports, botanical reports, wetland creation, wetland monitoring, 401, 

404, 105 and related state and local permits, assisting with 

environmental assessments, and preparation of other environmental 

reports. He also has experience performing Phase 1 bat 

hibernaculum and summer roost tree habitat surveys in Western 

Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE 

PERMITTING (OIL/GAS) 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical 

Lead; Stonehenge Appalachia, L.L.C.; Renick to Shields Natural 

Gas Pipeline Project, Butler County, Pennsylvania; January 2016 

to present. Responsibilities included co-preparing the Joint Permit 

application and all associated agency documentation to permit 

anticipated impacts along a 7.9 mile proposed pipeline. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical 

Lead; Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans); Equitrans Expansion Project 

(EEP), Allegheny, Washington, and Greene Counties, 

Pennsylvania; March 2016 to present. Responsibilities included 

assisting in preparing permit documents for the 401 Water Quality 

Certification. Additional work included preparation of many of the 

required components of a Joint Permit. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical 

Lead; Sunoco Logistics; S P L P Houston Tank Farm Project, 

Washington County, Pennsylvania; May 2015 to present. 

Responsibilities included performing a supplemental wetland 

delineation, functions and values assessment, wetland report, and 

Joint Permit preparation for the proposed wetland impacts at the 21 

acre proposed tank farm Project. 

EDUCATION 

B.A., Environmental Sciences, University of 

Pittsburgh, April. 2006 

Geographical Information Systems (GIS) 

Certificate, University of Pittsburgh, April. 2006 

REGISTRATIONS 

Wild Plant Management Permit, PA, since 2013, 

Permit # 19-624 

USFWS Certified Qualified Surveyor for the 

Federally Listed Running Buffalo Clover, Small 

Whorled Pogonia, and Virginia Spirea in West 

Virginia. Since May 2015 

AREA OF EXPERTISE 

Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification, 

State and Federal RTE Botanical Surveys, & 

Aquatic Resource Permitting. 

TRAINING/CERTIFICATIONS 

USFWS and WV DNR Sponsored Training for 

the Identification of the Federally Listed Running 

Buffalo Clover, Virginia Spirea, and Small 

Whorled Pogonia, May 2015. 

2015 PA Plant Forum and Winter Woody ID 

workshop. Sponsored by the PA DCNR and 

Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, April 2015. 

Creation and Restoration of Wetlands - The 

Olentangy River Wetland Research Park, The 

Ohio State University, July 2011. 

Identification of Freshwater Wetland Sedges, 

Grasses, and Rushes - Pennsylvania Institute for 

Conservation Education, August 2010. 

Ohio Rapid Assessment Method (ORAM) for 

Wetlands v. 5.0- Ohio Environmental Protection 

Agency, March. 2009. 

ACOE-based 40-hour Wetland Delineation 

Certification - March. 2007. 

OFFICE 

Pittsburgh, PA 

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 

10+ 

YEARS WITHIN FIRM 

5+ 

CONTACT 

Korey.McCluskey@TetraTech.com 
Résumé Korey M. McCluskey, Environmental Scientist IV – Technical Lead 

2 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV; MVP; Mountain Valley Pipeline Project, Multiple Counties, West Virginia 

and Virginia; 2016 to present. Responsibilities included assisting with review and compilation of multiple county 

wetland delineation reports and aiding in Nationwide Permit and 401 Water Quality Certification packages. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV; Department Technical Lead; Various Oil & Gas Projects, PNDI 

Sensitive Species Reviews and Agency Coordination, [primarily] Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia; 

2016 to present. Responsibilities included running PNDI searches and providing results for sensitive species hits 

for multiple Oil & Gas related projects. Agency coordination and requested report generation or submittal; including 

large and small project PNDI package submittals.

BOTANICAL FIELD WORK (OIL/GAS) 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Kinder Morgan, Inc.; TGP 300 Line Project 

Plant Species of Special Concern (SOSC) Monitoring Report, Rare, Threatened, and Engendered Species 

Surveys; 6 listed Species of Special Concern (SOSC); June 2017. SOSC botanical monitoring surveys were 

performed for six species along TGP Loop 317, TGP Loop 321, and TGP Loop 323 in Bradford County, Susquehanna 

County, and Pike County, respectively. A Plant Species of Special Concern Monitoring Report was prepared for 

Kinder Morgan for submission to PA state regulatory agencies. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Kinder Morgan, Inc.; TGP 300 Line Project 

Trailside Assessment Surveys and Botanical reconnaissance in the Bearfort Mountain Natural Area (BMNA) 

and the Abraham S. Hewitt State Forest (AHSF); June 2016. New Jersey. Trailside Assessments of the trails 

throughout the BMNA and AHSF. Assessed trail conditions, took photographs, and recorded botanical species in 

specified botanical niches throughout the two natural areas. A New Jersey state listed species of special concern 

Water Sedge (Carex aquatilis) that had not be previously identified in the area was recorded and reported. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Sunoco Logistics; OPP and PPP Natural 

Gas Pipeline Projects, Rare, Threatened, and Engendered Species Surveys; 43 listed Species of Special 

Concern (SOSC); March 2014 to present. Pennsylvania. Segments 1, 2, and 3 Botanical Survey Lead, and crew 

leader. Responsibilities included organizing and conducting all field work operations for multiple botanical crews, 

conducted botanical surveys for 43+ PA State listed species for the 350 miles of proposed pipeline installation for 

the Ohio Pipeline (OPP) and Pennsylvania Pipeline Projects (PPP). Additional work included proposing potential 

re-routes and avoidance recommendations on a potential environmental impact basis, and preparing Botanical 

Reports, Conservation Plans, and Monitoring for the Project. Also aided in conducting a RTE survey for the federally 

listed Running Buffalo Clover in the WV segment of OPP. 

June 2017 to present. Pennsylvania. Segments 1, 2, and 3 Botanical Survey Lead, and crew 

leader. Responsibilities included pre-construction surveying, sensitive species location confirmation, and 

documentation. Construction and post-construction monitoring to occur for sensitive species with PADCNR 

commitments in the coming months. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Noble Energy, Inc.; Dunkard Fork Water 

Withdrawal Project; Greene County, PA; June 2014 to September 2014. Responsible for conducting botanical 

surveys and habitat assessments for 5 listed SOSC. Responsible for preparing a botanical survey and habitat 

assessment report in support of permit submissions. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Rice Poseidon Midstream, LLC; North 

Fork Dunkard Fork Water Withdrawal Project; Greene County, PA; December 2014 to January 2015. 

Responsible for conducting a botanical habitat assessment for 2 listed SOSC. Responsible for preparing a botanical 

habitat assessment report in support of permit submissions. 
Résumé Korey M. McCluskey, Environmental Scientist IV – Technical Lead 

3 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist III; Sunoco Logistics; Mariner East [ME1] Pipeline Project Natural Gas 

Pipeline Projects, Rare, Threatened, and Engendered Species Surveys; 8 listed Species of Special Concern 

(SOSC); April 2013 to August 2013. Botanical Survey Lead, and crew leader. Responsibilities included 

organizing and conducting all field work operations for multiple botanical crews, conducted botanical surveys for 

the 20 miles of the 40 mile proposed pipeline installation Mariner East [ME1] Pipeline Project. Additional work 

included proposing potential avoidance recommendations based on a potential environmental impact basis. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Rice Drilling B, LLC; Fink Pond 

Impoundment Project; Greene County, PA; October 2014. Responsible for conducting a wetland delineation 

and stream investigation, as well as a botanical survey for 2 listed SOSC. Responsible for preparing a wetland 

delineation and stream identification report and a botanical survey report in support of permit submissions. 

Wetland Scientist; MEPCO, LLC.; Coresco Overland Coal Conveyor Project; Greene (PA) and Monogalia 

(WV) Counties. Responsible for wetland delineation and review and stream evaluation of a 10 mile overland coal 

conveyor. Rare, threatened, and endangered species (SOSC) survey and permitting services were provided. 

AQUATIC RESOURES FIELD WORK (OIL/GAS) 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Sunoco Logistics; OPP and PPP Natural 

Gas Pipeline Projects, Multiple Counties across Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania; October 2013 to 

present. Responsibilities included aiding in wetland delineations, stream assessments, and report preparation for 

the proposed 450 miles of the Ohio Pipeline (OPP) and Pennsylvania Pipeline Projects (PPP). 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Lebanon 

West II - TL-400 FERC Pipeline Project; Tuscarawas, Licking, Muskingum, Harrison, Coshocton, 

Columbiana, and Carroll Counties, Ohio (OH) and in Beaver County, Pennsylvania (PA); June 2014 to 

present. Responsible for conducting wetland delineations and stream evaluations for the natural gas pipeline 

replacement segments of the TL-400 FERC Pipeline Project. Specific tasks included field surveys, report 

preparation, and completion of Ohio EPA specific wetland and stream assessments. 

July 2017 to present. Ohio. Field Survey Lead. Responsibilities included post-construction 

wetland and stream restoration monitoring and report generation. Restoration monitoring surveys included 

documentation of restoration efforts at impacted aquatic resources, tabular and graphical representations of 

restoration progress, and technical reporting and recommendations to achieve post-construction permit closure 

conditions set forth by USACE and OEPA. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; MarkWest Liberty Midstream and 

Resources, LLC; Harmon Creek to Houston [Fox to Houston] Pipeline Project, Washington Co., PA. 

Responsible for conducting wetland delineation & stream surveys along 20-mile proposed natural gas pipeline and 

associated report generation. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; MarkWest Liberty Midstream and 

Resources, LLC; Fox to National Fuels Pipeline Project, Washington Co., PA. Responsible for conducting 

wetland delineation & stream surveys along 2-mile proposed natural gas pipeline and associated report generation. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; MarkWest Liberty Midstream and 

Resources, LLC; Fox to Midway-Candor Pipeline Project, Washington Co., PA. Responsible for conducting 

wetland delineation & stream surveys along 14-mile proposed natural gas pipeline and associated report 

generation. 
Résumé Korey M. McCluskey, Environmental Scientist IV – Technical Lead 

4 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; MarkWest Liberty Midstream and 

Resources, LLC; Imperial to Midway-Candor Pipeline Project, Washington Co., PA. Responsible for 

conducting wetland delineation & stream surveys along 1-mile proposed natural gas pipeline and associated report 

generation. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; MarkWest Liberty Midstream and 

Resources, LLC; Wetland Delineations for Miscellaneous Natural Gas Pipeline Projects; Washington, 

Beaver, Allegheny, and Butler Counties. Responsible for performing with wetland delineations for various 

proposed natural gas pipeline projects in southwestern Pennsylvania. Specific tasks included leading aquatic 

resource field surveys, report generation, and client and agency coordination.

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Chevron Appalachia, LLC; Various Water 

Withdrawal Projects; Greene, Fayette, Washington Counties (PA); 2014 to 2016. Responsible for conducting 

numerous wetland delineations and stream evaluations for proposed water withdrawal projects located in 

southwestern Pennsylvania. Also prepared wetland delineation and stream assessment reports for each project in 

support of permit submissions.

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Noble Energy, Inc.; Various Water 

Withdrawal Projects; Greene, Fayette, Washington Counties (PA), and Marshall County (WV); March 2014 

to 2016. Responsible for conducting numerous wetland delineations and stream evaluations for proposed water 

withdrawal projects located in southwestern Pennsylvania and the panhandle of West Virginia. Also prepared 

wetland delineation and stream assessment reports for each project in support of permit submissions.

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Noble Energy, Inc.; Wolfe Run Reservoir 

Water Withdrawal, Water Pipeline, and Access Road Project; Marshall County, WV; May 2014 to September 

2014. Responsible for conducting a wetland delineation and stream evaluation for a proposed water withdrawal, 

water pipeline, and its associated access road. Also prepared a wetland delineation and stream assessment report 

in support of permit submissions. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Rice Drilling D, LLC; Various Water 

Withdrawal Projects; Harrison and Belmont Counties (OH); March 2014 to present. Responsible for 

conducting numerous wetland delineations and stream evaluations for proposed water withdrawal projects located 

in eastern Ohio. Also prepared wetland delineation and stream assessment reports for each project in support of 

permit submissions. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Rice Poseidon Midstream, LLC; 

Waterboy to Pollock Natural Gas Pipeline Project; Washington County, PA; July 2014 to January 2015. 

Responsible for conducting a wetland delineation and stream identification survey. Responsible for preparing a 

wetland delineation and stream identification report in support of permit submissions. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV; MarkWest Liberty Midstream and Resources, LLC; Boyscout Camp 

Wetland Restoration Project & Post-Restoration Monitoring; Harrison County, PA; November 2012 to 

present. Responsible for evaluating post-impact conditions at a recently disturbed wetland, assist in designing a 

USACE approved wetland restoration plan. Plans included survey of current and proposed wetland habitats, 

elevations, and hydrologic inputs; planting/seeding plan and implementation instructions; and 

construction/earthwork calculations and implementation instructions. Also responsible for wetland restoration 

monitoring for the past two years. 
Résumé Korey M. McCluskey, Environmental Scientist IV – Technical Lead 

5 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist III; MarkWest Ohio Gathering Company, LLC; Wetland Delineations 

for Miscellaneous Natural Gas Pipeline Projects; Ohio. Responsible for performing and assisting with 

wetland delineations for various proposed natural gas pipeline projects in eastern Ohio. Specific tasks included 

field survey, report preparation, and completion of Ohio EPA specific wetland and stream assessments.

Wetland/Environmental Scientist III; Gulfport Energy Corporation; Wetland Delineations for 

Miscellaneous Natural Gas Well Pad Projects; Ohio. Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland 

delineations for various proposed natural well pads southeastern Ohio. Specific tasks included field survey, 

report preparation, and completion of Ohio EPA specific wetland and stream assessments.

Wetland/Environmental Scientist III; Williams/Laurel Mountain Midstream Operations, LLC; Brown to Davis 

Natural Gas Pipeline Project; Fayette County, PA; January 2013 to present. Conducted a wetland delineation 

and stream evaluation for the Brown to Davis natural gas pipeline project. Also prepared a wetland delineation and 

stream evaluation report in support of permit submissions. 

Wetland Scientist; Joseph and Lori Baker; Baker Property Wetland Restoration Project; Derry Township, 

Westmoreland County, PA; March 2010 to June 2010. As onsite environmental consultant to Joseph and Lori 

Baker, responsible for wetland and stream encroachment survey and assessment and assisted with a wetland 

restoration design and planting/seeding design. 

Wetland Scientist/Project Manager; Range Resources; Multiple Temporary and Permanent Water Pipelines; 

Washington County, Pennsylvania. 2010 to 2011. Mr. McCluskey was responsible for wetland delineations and 

stream evaluations on dozens of temporary and permanent water pipelines linking frac water impoundments in the 

Washington County area. 

AQUATIC RESOURES FIELD WORK (ENERGY TRANSMISSION) 

Wetland Scientist; Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc., Counties of Bergen (NJ) and Rockland (NY); 

Transmission Line 702 – Proposed Shield Wire Replacement Project; November 2008 to February 2009.

Responsible for wetland delineation and stream evaluation of a 500 foot wide, 10 mile long transmission line 

corridor. 

AQUATIC RESOURES FIELD WORK (MINING) 

Wetland Scientist; Rosebud Mining Company; Kiski Junction Railroad Allegheny River Spur Re-activation 

Project; Bethel and Gilpin Townships, Armstrong County, PA; 2007 to 2008. As onsite environmental 

consultant to Rosebud Mining Company, responsible for wetland delineation and assisted with the preparation of a 

Joint Permit Application for USACE Individual Permit, as well as assisting with wetland mitigation site search and 

wetland mitigation design for railroad re-activation project. 

Wetland Scientist; MEPCO, LLC.; Coresco Overland Coal Conveyor Project; Greene (PA) and Monogalia 

(WV) Counties. Responsible for wetland delineation and review and stream evaluation of a 10 mile overland coal 

conveyor. Rare, threatened, and endangered species (SOSC) survey and permitting services were provided. 
Résumé Korey M. McCluskey, Environmental Scientist IV – Technical Lead 

6 

CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV - Department Technical Lead; Tetra Tech, Inc.; Pittsburgh, PA, June 2014 – Present. 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist III; Tetra Tech, Inc.; Pittsburgh, PA, October 2012 – June 2014. 

Wetland Specialist/Project Manager; Pennsylvania Soil & Rock, Inc.; Monroeville, PA, May 2010 – October 2012. 

Wetland/Environmental Specialist; Pennsylvania Soil & Rock, Inc.; Monroeville, PA, March 2008 – May 2010. 

Wetlands Technician/Field Technician; Pennsylvania Soil & Rock, Inc.; Monroeville, PA, November 2006 – March 2008. 

Park Naturalist; Frick Environmental Center – City of Pittsburgh; Pittsburgh, PA, April 2006 – November 2006. 

MEMBERSHIPS 

 Society of Wetland Scientists (SWS) 

 Botanical Society of Western Pennsylvania (BSWP) 
Jason McGuirk

Wetland/Environmental Scientist IV

Résumé 1 

EXPERIENCE SUMMARY 

Mr. Jason McGuirk has 8 years of professional experience in wetland delineation, 

permitting, fisheries and wildlife, and stream assessments and classification in 

Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, West Virginia, Virginia, and Alaska. Mr. McGuirk has 

conducted hundreds of wetland delineations, stream evaluations as well as conducted 

and produced habitat assessments, and post monitoring impact statements and 

assessments on over 2300 miles of proposed natural gas pipeline, and hundreds of 

proposed well pad sites. He has extensive knowledge in watercourse classification and 

assessment including the Rosgen method. In particular attention of his has been 

focused on fisheries habitat and macro-invertebrate work, with over 200 miles of stream 

classifications in Alaska. M

Aquaculture with a minor focus in Marine Biology and Wildlife management. 

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE 

Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC; Mountain Valley Pipeline Project, WV & VA 

Environmental Wetlands Field Lead. Preformed wetland and stream delineations, 

Prepared Nationwide Permit applications for USACE Norfolk, Huntington, and 

Pittsburgh Districts and WV DEP Individual 401 Water Quality Certification application 

for a 303-mile natural gas pipeline project. Prepared wetland delineation/stream 

identification reports. 

Seneca Wind LLC, Seneca Wind Project, OH 

Natural Resources Field Lead. Preformed wetland and stream field surveys, and 

resource report for an approximately 3,600-acre proposed 200 MW wind energy 

development project. 

MarkWest Liberty Midstream and Resources, LLC; Fox to Midway-Candor 

Pipeline Project 

Conducted a wetland delineation & stream survey along 14-mile proposed natural gas 

pipeline. USACE Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region. Washington Co., PA. 

MarkWest Liberty Midstream and Resources, various additional Pipeline Projects 

2018

Conducted wetland and stream surveys along approximately 8-miles of proposed 

natural gas pipeline and fiber optic lines. USACE Eastern Mountains and Piedmont 

Region. Washington, Co., PA. 

Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company, LLC; Transco Pipeline O&M Testing & 

Maintenance Projects, VA & NC 

Natural Resources Lead. Conducted wetland and stream surveys and reporting for over 

20 O&M sites in VA and NC. 

NextEra Energy Resources; Muskingum Solar Project, OH 

Conducted a wetland delineation & stream survey for a 1,250-acre proposed solar 

energy development project. USACE Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region. 

Muskingum Co., OH. 

EDUCATION 

B.T. Fisheries and Aquaculture, 

SUNY Cobleskill, 2011 

REGISTRATIONS 

Wild Plant Management Permit, 

PA, 2016, Permit # 14-651 

AREA OF EXPERTISE 

Wetland Delineation and Stream 

Identification, Fisheries, and 

Botanical Surveys 

TRAINING/CERTIFICATIONS 

Winter Vegetation ID, 

Rutgers University, 2012 

Amtrak Contractor 

Certification, 2014 

Certified Wetland 

Assessment Delineator, NY, 

2009

OFFICE 

Pittsburgh, PA 

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 

8+ 

YEARS WITH TETRA TECH 

6+ 

EDUCATION 

B.T. Fisheries and Aquaculture, 

SUNY Cobleskill, 2011 

REGISTRATIONS 

Wild Plant Management Permit, 

PA, 2016, Permit # 14-651 

AREA OF EXPERTISE 

Wetland Delineation and Stream 

Identification, Fisheries, and 

Botanical Surveys 

TRAINING/CERTIFICATIONS 

Winter Vegetation ID, 

Rutgers University, 2012 

Amtrak Contractor 

Certification, 2014 

Certified Wetland 

Assessment Delineator, NY, 

2009

OFFICE 

Pittsburgh, PA 

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 

8+ 

YEARS WITH TETRA TECH 

6+ 
Résumé Jason McGuirk Wetland/Environmental Scientist Wetlands and Ecological Services 

2 

EQM Gathering OPCO, LLC; NIPIS Suction Pipeline System Project, PA 

Natural Resources Lead. Conducted wetland and stream surveys and reporting for an approximately 6-mile proposed suction 

pipeline project. USACE Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region. Washington Co., PA.

EQM Gathering OPCO, LLC; NIPIH201 Freshwater Pipeline System Project, PA 

Natural Resources Lead. Conducted wetland and stream surveys and reporting for an approximately 8-mile proposed freshwater 

pipeline project. USACE Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region. Washington Co., PA. 

EQM Gathering OPCO, LLC; NIBE Natural Gas Pipeline System Project, PA 

Natural Resources Lead. Conducted wetland, stream, and botanical T&E surveys (single-headed pussytoes, Antennaria 

solitaria, a PA state-listed species) and reporting for an approximately 8-mile proposed natural gas pipeline project. USACE 

Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region. Greene Co., PA.

Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc.; O&M Testing & Maintenance Projects, PA 

Natural Resources Lead. 1) Conducted wetland and stream surveys, and 2) post-construction monitoring and reporting for over 

20 O&M testing and repair projects. USACE Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region. PA.

EQM Gathering OPCO, LLC; O&M Testing & Maintenance Projects, PA 

Natural Resources Lead. Conducted wetland and stream surveys and reporting for over 5 O&M testing and repair projects. 

USACE Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region. PA.

Environmental Scientist IV; MVP LLC; Wetland Delineations for Natural Gas Pipeline Project Responsibilities include 

organizing and conducting field work operations for multiple task including, wetland delineations and stream assessments for 

the proposed 300 mile West Virginia Pipeline Project. Additional work included proposing potential re-route on an environmental 

basis. Preformed benthic macroinvertebrate surveys for over 100 identified streams using the US EPA Rapid Bioassessment 

Protocols. Responsible for field coordination preforming field surveys and identification of all macroinvertebrate species collected 

to family level. 

Environmental Scientist IV; Sunoco Logistics; Wetland Delineations for Miscellaneous Natural Gas Pipeline Projects, 

Engendered Species Surveys; Reptilia (Glyptemys muhlenbergii), Plantae (Ellisia nyctelea); Pennsylvania. Segments 1, 

2, and 3 wetlands field lead, and crew leader. Responsibilities include organizing and conducting all field work operations for 

multiple wetlands crews, wetland delineations and stream assessments for the proposed 450-mile Pennsylvania Pipeline 

Project. Additional work included proposing potential re-route on an environmental basis. Preformed benthic macroinvertebrate 

surveys for over 200 identified streams using the Headwater Macroinvertebrate Field Evaluation Index (HMFEI). Additionally 

preforming field surveys on all stream identified in OH using the Primary Headwater Habitat Evaluation Form. HHEI and QHEI. 

Responsible for field coordination preforming field surveys and identification of all macroinvertebrate species collected to family 

level.

Environmental Scientist III; MarkWest Liberty Midstream & Resources, LLC; Wetland Delineations for Miscellaneous 

Natural Gas Pipeline Projects; Pennsylvania. Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland delineations for various 

proposed natural gas pipeline projects in southwestern Pennsylvania. Specific tasks included field survey, report preparation, 

and wetland functional assessments. 

Environmental Scientist III; MarkWest Ohio Gathering Company, LLC; Wetland Delineations for Miscellaneous Natural 

Gas Pipeline Projects; Ohio. Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland delineations for various proposed natural 

gas pipeline projects in eastern Ohio. Specific tasks included field survey, report preparation, and completion of Ohio EPA 

specific wetland and stream assessments. 

Environmental Scientist III; Gulfport Energy Corporation; Wetland Delineations for Miscellaneous Natural Gas Well Pad 

Projects; Ohio. Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland delineations for various proposed natural well pads 

southeastern Ohio. Specific tasks included field survey, report preparation, PCN preparation, and completion of Ohio EPA

specific wetland and stream assessments. 

Environmental Scientist III; MarkWest Liberty Midstream & Resources, LLC; Wetland Delineation and Engendered 

Species Survey (Ranunculus flabellaris and Alopecurus aequalis) for Vanport to Butler Gas Pipeline; Butler County, 

Pennsylvania. Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland delineation and endangered species survey along pipeline

right-of-way. Specific tasks included field survey and report preparation.

Environmental Scientist III; Antero Resources Appalachian Corp.; Wetland Delineations for Miscellaneous Natural Gas 

Pipeline Projects; Ritchie and Doddridge Counties, West Virginia. Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland 

delineations for various proposed natural gas well pads and access roads in northern West Virginia. Specific tasks included field

survey and report preparation.
Résumé Jason McGuirk Wetland/Environmental Scientist Wetlands and Ecological Services 

3 

Wetland & Watercourse Biologist; Chesapeake Energy; Schoharie County, PA; November 2011 to October 2012.

Responsible for conducting wetland delineations for proposed pipe line routes and reroutes. Performed PA Rapid Assessments, 

stream evaluation, and preparation of wetland report for 30 miles of pipeline in Northeastern Pennsylvania. 

Wetland & Watercourse Biologist; Southwest Energy L.P; Schoharie County, PA; November 2011 to October 2012. 

Responsible for conducting wetland delineations on proposed Well pad and compressor sites. Performed PA Rapid 

Assessments, stream evaluation, and preparation of wetland report for 15 proposed well pad locations in Northeastern 

Pennsylvania. 

Wetland & Watercourse Biologist; Southwest Energy L.P; Susquehanna County, PA; November 2011 to October 2012. 

Responsible for conducting wetland delineations on proposed Well pad and compressor sites. Performed PA Rapid 

Assessments, stream evaluation, and preparation of wetland report for 20 proposed well pad locations in Northeastern 

Pennsylvania. 

Wetland & Watercourse Biologist; Chesapeake Energy; Carroll, Jefferson County, OH; November 2011 to October 2012. 

Responsible for conducting wetland delineations for proposed pipe line routes and reroutes. Performed ORAM and QHEI 

Assessments, and preparation of wetland report for 30 miles of pipeline in Eastern Ohio. 

Wetland & Watercourse Biologist; Shell Oil; Butler County, PA; November 2011 to October 2012. Responsible for 

conducting wetland delineations for proposed pipe line routes and reroutes. Performed PA Rapid Assessments, stream 

evaluation, and preparation of wetland report for 40 miles of pipeline in Western Pennsylvania. 

Wetland & Watercourse Biologist; Chesapeake Energy; Schoharie County, PA; November 2011 to October 2012. 

Responsible for conducting Indiana Bat habitat surveys on multiple proposed natural gas pipelines in Northeastern Pennsylvania. 

Wetland & Watercourse Biologist; Chesapeake Energy; Schoharie County, PA; November 2011 to October 2012. 

Responsible for conducting post construction habitat monitoring and assessment of constructed natural gas pipelines in 

Northeastern Pennsylvania. 

Salmonid & Stream Biologist; US Forest Service Thorne Bay, AK, May 2009 to August 2009. Responsible for preforming 

stream assessments using the Rosgen Method for stream classification. Benthic macro invertebrate surveys sampling and native 

salmonid and native fish species surveys. 

RELEVANT EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 

Wetland Environmental Scientist IV; Tetra Tech, Inc.; Pittsburgh, PA, June 2014 - Present 

Wetland Environmental Scientist III; Tetra Tech, Inc.; Pittsburgh, PA, February 2013 - June 2014 

Wetland & Watercourse Biologist; Hanover Engineering & Associates; Towanda, PA, November 2011 - October 2012 

Assistant Hatchery Manager; SUNY Cobleskill; Cobleskill, NY, September May of 2009- 2011 

Biological Fisheries Technician, US Forest Service; Thorne Bay, AK, May 2010 - August 2010 

Fisheries Technician, Cook Inlet Aquaculture Association, Kenai, AK, May 2009 August 2009 

SCIENTIFIC/TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 

Sander vitreus) spawning movements and habitat utilization in Otsego Lake, NY, 2011 

MEMBERSHIPS 

VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE 

AWARDS

David E. Moorehouse Award for Outstanding Junior in Fisheries and Aquaculture B.T. 
Kevin Pulver

Environmental Scientist II 

1 

EDUCATION 

B.S. Geography: Watershed 

Management; Environmental 

Science, 2013, Mansfield University 

of Pennsylvania 

B.A. Environmental Studies, 2011, 

Penn State University Altoona 

REGISTRATIONS/ 

AFFILIATIONS 

PADCNR Wild Plant Management, 

Permit No. 16-673 (2016) 

TRAINING/CERTIFICATIONS 

40 Hour HAZWOPER Training 

(2017) 

Certified Wetland Botanist Training, 

Swamp School (2017) 

40 Hour Army Corps of Engineers 

Wetland Delineation Training (2013) 

CPR / First Aid / AED (2018) 

OFFICE 

 Pittsburgh, PA 

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 

4 

YEARS WITH TETRA TECH 

4 

CONTACT 

Email: kevin.pulver@tetratech.com

Direct: 412.920.7024 

Cell: 412.735.0110 

EXPERIENCE SUMMARY 

Mr. Kevin Pulver has over 4 years of professional experience in wetland 

delineation and stream assessment and classification throughout 

Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia and Mississippi. As an 

Environmental Scientist II, Mr. Pulver has had the opportunity to perform 

numerous wetland delineations within the Wetlands and Ecological 

Services Department at Tetra Tech , Pennsylvania office. 

Delineations were primarily performed for natural gas pipeline projects 

as well as various other energy related sectors such as wind and solar. 

Mr. Pulver has also participated in bat habitat/roosting surveys as well 

as plant surveys for listed species. Mr. educational background 

includes watershed management, stream restoration and environmental 

science. He is also versed in GIS and AutoCAD software application. 

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE 

Energy: Oil / Gas / Wind / Solar 

Environmental Scientist II; EQM Gathering OPCO, LLC; Wetland 

Delineation for the NITMS005 Pipeline Project; Greene County, 

Pennsylvania; August 2018 and February 2019. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with a wetland delineation, 

stream assessment, and report preparation for a proposed pipeline 

project in Greene County, PA. Also responsible for conducting a stream 

re-evaluation and preparation of a technical memo per PADEP request 

Environmental Scientist II; Transco, LLC; Wetland Delineation for 

the MS LMP Project Access Road Improvements at Station 77; 

Covington County, Mississippi; November 2018. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with a wetland delineation, 

stream assessment, and report preparation for a proposed road 

improvement project on the MS LMP Project. 

Environmental Scientist II; CenturyLink, Inc; Wetland Delineation 

for Reading to Allentown Segment 2 Project; Berks and Lehigh 

Counties, Pennsylvania; October 2018. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with a wetland delineation, 

stream assessment, and report preparation for a 40-mile fiber optic line 

from Reading, PA to Allentown, PA. 

Environmental Scientist II; Seneca Wind, LLC; Wetland Delineation 

for Seneca Wind OH Solar Project; Seneca County, Ohio; 

September 2018. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with a wetland delineation, 

stream assessment, and report preparation for a proposed 3,662-acre 

wind farm. 
2 

Environmental Scientist II; NextEra Energy Resources, LLC; Permitting and Wetland Delineation for 

Muskingum OH Solar Project; Ohio, June 2017. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with a wetland delineation, stream assessment, and report 

preparation for a proposed 1400-acre solar farm. 

Environmental Scientist II; EQT; Permitting and Wetland Delineation for Mountain Valley Pipeline 

Project; West Virginia; April 2015 to Present. 

Collaborated with team in preparing Nationwide and State 401 permit packages. Conducted wetland 

delineation field surveys and stream assessments. 

Environmental Scientist II; Equitrans, LP; Field Operations Coordinator; Mountain Valley Pipeline 

Project; West Virginia & Virginia; 2015 to Present. 

Responsible for the management and oversight of all wetland and stream delineation surveys for the 

proposed 303-Mile Mountain Valley Pipeline Project (MVP) throughout West Virginia and Virginia. 

Environmental Scientist II; Sunoco Logistics; Wetland Delineations for the Mariner East II Pipeline 

Project; Pennsylvania 2014 to Present. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland delineations and stream assessments for the 

proposed 350-Mile Mariner East II Project. Other responsibilities included report preparation, wetland 

functional assessments and pre-construction wetland, stream and riparian forest buffer monitoring. 

Environmental Scientist II; Clean Energy Future, LLC; Wetland Delineations on a 60-acre Study Area; 

Trumbull County, Ohio 2016. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with a wetland delineation, stream assessment, and report 

preparation for a proposed 60-acre study area in Trumbull County, OH. 

Environmental Scientist II, NextEra Energy Resources, LLC; Wetland Delineations for Proposed Solar 

Farm Project; Muskingum County, Ohio 2016. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with a wetland delineation, stream assessment, and report 

preparation for a 1,244-acre study area for a proposed solar farm project in Muskingum County, OH. 

Environmental Scientist II; Dawn Inc.; Bat Roost Tree Assessment for Proposed Commercial Building; 

Trumbull County, Ohio 2016. 

Responsible for assessing and determining the quality and quantity of potential suitable Myotid bat habitat 

present on a 0.5-acre study area. 

Environmental Scientist II; Seahorse Oilfield Services, LLC; Wetland Delineations on a 16-acre Study 

Area; Monroe County, West Virginia 2016. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland delineations and stream assessments on a 16-acre 

study area in Monroe County, WV. 

Environmental Scientist II; MarkWest Liberty Midstream & Resources, LLC; Wetland 

Delineations for Miscellaneous Natural Gas Pipeline Projects; Pennsylvania 2014 to 2016. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland delineations for various proposed natural gas 

pipeline projects in southwestern Pennsylvania. Specific tasks included field survey, report preparation, 

and wetland functional assessments. 
3 

Environmental Scientist II; MarkWest Ohio Gathering Company, LLC; Wetland

Delineations for Miscellaneous Natural Gas Pipeline Projects; Ohio 2014 to 2016. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland delineations for various proposed natural gas 

pipeline projects in eastern Ohio. Specific tasks included field survey, report preparation, and completion of 

Ohio EPA specific wetland and stream assessments. 

Environmental Scientist II; Travis Peak Resources, LLC; Wetland Delineations for a Proposed 

Water Withdrawal on Pine Creek and a Proposed Tank Farm Location in Tioga County, PA; 

Pennsylvania 2016. 

Responsible for performing and assisting with wetland delineations on a proposed water withdrawal and 

tank farm area in Tioga County, PA. Specific tasks included field survey and report preparation. 

Environmental Scientist I; Range Resources; Wetland Delineations for Miscellaneous Natural Gas 

Pipeline Projects; 2014 2015. 

Assisted with wetland delineations, stream assessments, and report preparation for various proposed water 

withdrawal locations in Southwestern PA.

EMPLOYEMENT HISTORY 

Wetland/Environmental Scientist II, Tetra Tech, Inc., November, 2014 Present, Pittsburgh, PA 

AutoCAD Drafter, Land Services Group, November 2013-July 2014, Wellsboro, PA 

Cartographer, Intelligent Direct, Inc., May 2013 November 2013, Wellsboro, PA 

Biological Scientist Intern, United States Geologic Survey - Northern Appalachian Research 

Laboratory, Summer 2012, Wellsboro, PA 

MEMBERSHIPS 

Society of Wetland Scientists 
Wyatt Jackson

Environmental Scientist I

Résumé 1 

EXPERIENCE SUMMARY 

Mr. Jackson has three years of experience in the environmental field. Most of his 

experience is related to botanical surveys. Other areas of experience include habitat 

remediation, moth surveys, and scientific report writing. His educational background 

includes studies in wetland ecology, general chemistry, geology, environmental 

science, wetland science, and ecosystem ecology. 

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE 

Environmental Scientist I; EQT; Wetland Delineation and Stream Assessments 

for Mountain Valley Pipeline Project; West Virginia, March 2019. Conducted 

wetland delineations and stream assessments for EQT at various sites in West 

Virginia. Specific tasks included field survey and submitting data for permitting 

purposes. 

Environmental Scientist I; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental 

Protection; Wetland Delineations and Stream Assessments for Sludge Injection 

Line; Pennsylvania, March 2019. Conducted wetland delineations and stream 

assessments for PADEP at Blacklick Valley Natural Area. Specific tasks included field 

survey and report preparation. 

Environmental Scientist I; Range Resources; Stream and Habitat Assessments 

for Water Withdrawal Intake Pipeline; Pennsylvania, February 2019. Conducted 

stream assessments and habitat assessments for threatened plants. Conducted 

botanical survey for Harbinger-of-spring, White Trout Lily, and Snow Trillium. 

Prepared report for this project. 

Environmental Scientist I; MarkWest Liberty Midstream & Resources, LLC; 

Wetland Delineations and Stream Assessments for Natural Gas Pipeline Project; 

Pennsylvania, February 2019. Conducted wetland delineations and stream 

assessments for a proposed natural gas pipeline. Specific tasks included field survey 

and report preparation. 

Research Assistant; State University of New York Research Foundation; Great 

Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Project; New York, June 2018 to August 

2018. Surveyed hydrophytic vegetation in areas of concern in Lake Ontario coastal 

wetlands. 

Research Assistant; State University of New York Research Foundation; Plant 

Ecology Lab; New York, May 2017 to August 2017. Designed and conducted 

experiment to quantify effects of invasive plant species on Lepidopteran communities. 

Research Assistant; State University of New York Research Foundation; 

Wetland Ecology Lab; New York, May 2016 to August 2016. Conducted botanical 

surveys for new invasive grass and used soil data to characterize its habitat 

preferences and dispersal mechanisms.

CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY 

Environmental Scientist I; Tetra Tech, Inc.; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 2019 – Present 

Environmental Educator; The Audubon Society of Western Pennsylvania; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania September 2018 – 

October 2018 

Research Assistant; State University of New York Research Foundation; Brockport, New York; May 2016 – August 2018 

EDUCATION 

B.S., Environmental Science & 

Ecology, State University of 

New York – The College at 

Brockport 

AREA OF EXPERTISE 

Wetland Ecology 

TRAINING/CERTIFICATIONS 

American Heart Association 

CPR/First Aid, August 2018 

10 Hour OSHA Training, 

January 2019 

OFFICE 

Pittsburgh, PA 

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 

3 

YEARS WITHIN FIRM 

1 

CONTACT 

wyatt.jackson@tetratech.com