alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Equal employment opportunity is the law

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Equal employment opportunity is the law 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  145 × 36 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018264963.jpg; 018264963.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Case No. 15,169.

#### UNITED STATES v. FRIDENBERG.

[See Case No. 15,168.]
EXHIBIT 32.2

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of American Renal Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ John J. McDonough  
|John J. McDonough      
|Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2011
**AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JUDGMENT IN CIVIL CASE 

MARK A. MAYS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

Civil Action 2:11-cv-01007

v. Judge Algenon L. Marbley

Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

WILLIAM A. ELEBY, et al.,

 Defendants.

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have

been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That pursuant to the

December 21, 2011 Order, the Court DISMISSED this action

without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee

or apply to proceed without the prepayment of fees. 

Date: December 21, 2011 James Bonini, Clerk

 s/Betty L. Clark 

 Betty L. Clark/Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-01007-ALM-EPD Doc #: 7 Filed: 12/21/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### PHILANDO C. LANGDON, Respondent, *v.*CHARLES E. EVANS, Appellant.

*Appeal*— Notice *of entry of judgment must be both subscribed by the attorney and his office address must be slated thereon.*

A copy of a judgment signed by the clerk of the court and a notice of the entry thereof signed with the name of the attorney, but not indorsed or subscribed with his office address or place of business, was served upon the defendant against wham judgment was recovered.

*Held,*that such service was irregular and void and did not set in motion the statute limiting the time within which an appeal could be taken.

Motion to dismiss an appeal.

--, for the appellant.

*Devoid Barnett,*for the respondent.

Dykman, J.:

A motion to dismiss the appeal in this action is made on the following facts: The action is replevin and judgment was entered *653oil the 23d day of January, 1878, and on the same -day a copy of the judgment, signed by the clerk of the court, and written notice of the entry of the judgment, signed by the plaintiff’s attorney, was served on the attorney for the defendant. On the 20th day of February, 1878, the defendant’s attorney filed a notice of appeal from the judgment to the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the office of the county clerk of Kings county, where the judgment was entered. This notice of appeal was not served on the plaintiff’s attorney until the 16th day of December, 1882.

To perfect this appeal it was necessary to take it within thirty days after service of a copy of the judgment appealed from, and a written notice of the entry thereof, by serving on the plaintiff’s attorney and on the clerk of the court, with whom the judgment was entered by filing it in his office, a written notice of the appeal. (Code Civil Pro., §§ 1300,1351.) Service on both the attorney and the clerk was essential, and the latter service was not made.

The excuse put forth for this non-service is that neither the copy of the judgment served nor the notice of entry was indorsed or subscribed with the name of the attorney and his office address or place of business as required by the second rule of the Supreme Court; and it is true that they were, neither of them, so subscribed.

In the case of *Kelly*v. *Sheehan*(76 N. Y., 325) a copy of the judgment with notice of the entry thereof, signed by the attorney without the addition of his office address or place of business, was served as here, and the notice of appeal was served one day too late if the notice of entry of judgment had been regular. But the Court of Appeals held that the notice of entry of judgment was irregular and void because it was not indorsed or subscribed with the name of the attorney and his office address or place of business. This omission was again held fatal to the sufficiency of the notice to set in motion the short statute of limitation to appeal in the case of *Kilmer*v. *Hathorn*(78 N. Y., 229).

These authorities are decisive of this case and the motion to dismiss the appeal should be denied, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Barnard, P. J., concurred; Pratt, J., not sitting.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6436]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD07-3-007]

Review of Cost Submittals by Other Federal Agencies for 
Administering Part I of the Federal Power Act; Notice Requesting 
Questions and Comments on Fiscal Year 2006 Other Federal Agency Cost 
Submissions

April 2, 2007.
    In its Order On Rehearing Consolidating Administrative Annual 
Charges Bill Appeals And Modifying Annual Charges Billing Procedures 
(109 FERC ] 61,040), the Commission set forth an annual deadline for 
Other Federal Agencies (OFAs) to submit their costs related to 
Administering Part I of the Federal Power Act. The Commission required 
the OFAs to submit their costs by December 31st of each fiscal year 
(FY) using the OFA Cost Submission Form. The order also announced that 
a technical conference would be held for the purpose of reviewing the 
submitted cost forms and detailed supporting documentation.
    On March 29, 2007, the Commission held a technical conference to 
review the FY 2006 OFA cost submissions, which was attended by OFAs and 
licensees.
    Within two weeks of the date of this notice, interested parties may 
file their specific questions and comments on the FY 2006 OFA cost 
submissions with the Commission under Docket No. AD07-3-007. Once 
filed, the Commission will forward the questions and comments to the 
OFAs for response.
    Anyone with questions pertaining to the technical conference or 
this notice should contact Fannie Kingsberry at (202) 502-6108 (via e-
mail at [email protected]), or Norman Richardson at (202) 502-
6219 (via e-mail at [email protected]).

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6436 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 99.8  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   
 I, W. Murray Rodgers, Chief Executive Officer of Zodiac Exploration Inc. (the “Company”) , hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:   a.the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and        b.the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:   March  14, 2012       By: /s/ W. Murray Rodgers   Name: W. Murray Rodgers   Title: Chief Executive Officer      This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
# C_2008135EN.01000301.xml

| 3.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 June 2008

(2008/C 135/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5521 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 162,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4591 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,7915 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3454 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6182 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 116,52 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9425 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,03 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 241,06 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7025 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,3809 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,612 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,331 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,903 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6243 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,546 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,1129 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9796 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1173 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 588,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,9883 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7607 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2468 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 442,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0001 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,361 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,8485 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,583 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,533 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0573 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5521

JPY

Japanese yen

162,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4591

GBP

Pound sterling

0,7915

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3454

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6182

ISK

Iceland króna

116,52

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9425

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,03

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

241,06

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7025

PLN

Polish zloty

3,3809

RON

Romanian leu

3,612

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,331

TRY

Turkish lira

1,903

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6243

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,546

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,1129

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9796

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1173

KRW

South Korean won

1 588,96

ZAR

South African rand

11,9883

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7607

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2468

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 442,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0001

PHP

Philippine peso

67,361

RUB

Russian rouble

36,8485

THB

Thai baht

50,583

BRL

Brazilian real

2,533

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0573

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2008301EN.01000201.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/2

---

Election of Presidents of Chambers of three Judges

(2008/C 301/02)

At a meeting on 23 September 2008, the Judges of the Court of Justice, pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the Rules of Procedure, elected Mr Ilešič, Mr Bonichot, Mr Ó Caoimh and Mr von Danwitz as Presidents of the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Chambers of three Judges respectively, for a period of one year from 7 October 2008 to 6 October 2009.

---
# CA2008025EN.01001601.xml

| 30.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 25/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 25/16

---

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/39/07

OPEN COMPETITION

ASSISTANTS (AST 3) IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

ASSISTANTS

IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

(Irish language)

(2008/C 25 A/03)

| Chairman: | Valeria SCIARRINO |
| --- | --- |
| Alternate chairman: | Noírin UI MHAÓLAOI |
| Full members: | Liam EGAN |
| | Evelina MORKUTE |

Chairman:

Valeria SCIARRINO

Alternate chairman:

Noírin UI MHAÓLAOI

Full members:

Liam EGAN

Evelina MORKUTE

---
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of TransTechnology Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 27, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: August 13, 2004               /s/ Robert L. G. White
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Robert L. G. White,
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 13, 2004               /s/ Joseph F. Spanier
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Joseph F. Spanier,
                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                       20
Case: 2:12-cr-00125-MHW-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 07/19/12 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cr-00125-MHW-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 07/19/12 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T14:10:13-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# C_2008111EN.01004501.xml

| 6.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/45

---

Call for proposals under the ‘Capacities’ work programme of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

(2008/C 111/14)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the ‘Capacities’ work programme of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call.

‘Capacities’ Specific Programme:

| Part | : | Research Infrastructures |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Call Identifier | : | FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2008-2 |

Part

:

Research Infrastructures

Call Identifier

:

FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2008-2

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2007) 5759 of 29 November 2007.

Information on the call budget, deadline and modalities, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
A90A0526.

#### ROBERSON v. THE STATE.

(393 SE2d 516)

Decided April 16, 1990.

*Eleanor R. Dotson,*for appellant.

*Harry D. Dixon, Jr., District Attorney, Deborah M. Perlis, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Banke, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was convicted of two counts of selling cocaine in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. He appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial. Held:

1. The appellant contends that the trial court erred by failing to hold a hearing on his motion for disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant who had been involved in his arrest. See *Moore v. State,*187 Ga. App. 387 (2) (370 SE2d 517) (1988). Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.1 requires all motions in a criminal case to be filed at or before the time of arraignment, “unless time therefor is extended by the judge in writing prior to trial.” The record reveals that the appellant’s motion was not filed until over one month after his arraignment, and there is no indication that he sought an extension of time in which to file his motion. Accordingly, this enumeration of error is without merit. Accord *State v. Grandison,*192 Ga. App. 473 (385 SE2d 139) (1989).

2. The appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying a motion for mistrial which he made after the state was allowed to withdraw a witness. In response to the appellant’s motion, the court instructed the jury to disregard the witness’ testimony; and the appellant did not thereafter object to the curative instruction or renew his motion for mistrial. Consequently, this enumeration of error presents nothing for review. See *Brown v. State,*187 Ga. App. 347 (1) (370 SE2d 203) (1988).

3. Reviewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the appellant guilty of both the offenses of which he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. See generally *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Birdsong and Cooper, JJ., concur.*
Before the Third Division,

November 25, 1944

No. 49820.

#### Protest 965682-G of Quong Lee & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same as that involved in *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was sustained.
# C_2007183EN.01002905.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 24 April 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-397/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 183/55)

Language of the case: Estonian

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 18.11.2006.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2005 of the Trust Created February 25, 1986 (the Trust) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers does hereby certify that to the best of his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                            
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          result of operations of the Trust.

| | Date:   July 15, 2005       | /s/ John A. Irwin
| | --------------------------- | -----------------
| | John A. Irwin              
| | Principal Executive Officer

| | Date:   July 15, 2005       | /s/ Lawrence J. Bolton
| | --------------------------- | ----------------------
| | Lawrence J. Bolton         
| | Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by
the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 50583.

#### Protests 68667-K, etc., of Crawford S. Norris et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as. certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.