alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007155EN.01002501.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/25

---

Action brought on 24 April 2007 — Mohr & Sohn v Commission

(Case T-131/07)

(2007/C 155/50)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Paul Mohr & Sohn, Baggerei und Schiffahrt (Niederwalluf (Rhg), Germany) (represented by: F. von Waldstein, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the defendant's decision of 28 February 2007 and order the European Commission to grant the applicant an exemption for the crane vessel ‘Niclas’, in accordance with Article 4(6) of Council Regulation (EC) No 718/1999 of 29 March 1999 on a Community-fleet capacity policy to promote inland waterway transport; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the defendant's decision of 28 February 2007 and order the European Commission to grant the applicant an exemption for the crane vessel ‘Niclas’, in accordance with Article 4(6) of Council Regulation (EC) No 718/1999 of 29 March 1999 on a Community-fleet capacity policy to promote inland waterway transport;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant challenges the decision of the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport of the Commission (2007) D/200972 of 28 February 2007 in respect of the application which it made pursuant to Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 718/1999 (1) for an exemption for the crane vessel ‘Niclas’. The applicant applied for that specialised vessel to be exempted from the application of the ‘old-for-new’ rule. In the contested decision the defendant decided not to grant the relevant exemption for the vessel ‘Niclas’.

1

In support of its action the applicant claims, in particular, that the crane vessel ‘Niclas’ is not a vessel which is subject to Regulation No 718/1999. It submits, in that regard, that the ship concerned is not in possession of a certificate of entitlement to operate on the Rhine, which is however a requirement for the legal transportation of goods on the European waterways. According to the applicant, the crane vessel ‘Niclas’ is no different from storage vessels under Article 2(2)(f) of Regulation No 718/1999 or from hopper vessels and floating construction plants within the meaning of Article 2(2)(g) of that regulation.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 718/1999 of 29 March 1999 on a Community-fleet capacity policy to promote inland waterway transport.

1

---
Before the Second Division,

July 11, 1938

No. 38975.

#### Protests 185822-G, etc., of Bernard Judae & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain merchandise consists of cellulose filaments in the form of single or double yarns similar to the merchandise involved in *Weinman*v. *United States*(T. D. 49408). The claim at 40 cents per pound under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
Case: 2:12-cv-00117-GLF-EPD Doc #: 9 Filed: 09/06/12 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00117-GLF-EPD Doc #: 9 Filed: 09/06/12 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T10:20:11-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.12


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                               CSX CAPITAL TRUST I



       THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of CSX Capital Trust I (the "Trust"), is being
duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustee, to form a business trust
under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. (S)3801, et seq.).

       I.     Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is CSX Capital
              ----
              Trust I.

       II.    Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
              ----------------
              the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of
              Delaware is Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, 1201
              Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.


       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned trustee of the Trust has executed
this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811 of the Delaware
Business Trust Act.


                 CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
                                            not in its individual capacity
                                            but solely as trustee of the Trust


                                            By: /s/ John J. Cashin
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name: John J. Cashin
                                                Title: Vice President
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Bauman Estate Planning, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Todd Bauman  Todd Bauman, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)   /s/ Todd Bauman  Todd Bauman, Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer)  Date: October 16, 2015
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Defense Logistics Agency general objectives

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Defense Logistics Agency general objectives 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Defense Logistics Agency 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Defense Logistics Agency 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Defense Logistics Agency 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 46 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018921998.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
exhibit103.htm


    
       

      Exhibit
10.3

       

      AMENDMENT

      TO
THE

      MONSANTO
BENEFITS PLAN FOR THIRD COUNTRY NATIONALS

      


      Effective
August 5, 2008, the following new Appendix A shall be added at the end of the
Monsanto Benefits Plan for Third Country Nationals.

      


      


      APPENDIX
A

      


      This
Appendix to the TCN Plan sets forth the benefits payable under the TCN Plan to
Hugh Grant and shall apply notwithstanding anything in the TCN Plan to the
contrary.   This Appendix is effective August 5,
2008.

      


      DISABILITY
BENEFIT

      


      If Mr.
Grant becomes disabled while employed by Monsanto Company and prior to attaining
age 65, he shall be entitled to a disability benefit in the amount of $1,233,800
per year.  Such disability benefit shall be paid monthly, with each
monthly payment equal to one-twelfth (1/12) of such annual
amount.  Payments shall commence 180 days after Mr. Grant becomes
disabled (or, if later, January 1, 2009) and shall continue until the earliest
of Mr. Grant’s (i) recovery from disability, (ii) attainment of age 65, and
(iii) death.

      


      For this
purpose, Mr. Grant shall be considered to be disabled if either: (i) he is
unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically
determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in
death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12
months; or (ii) is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental
impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last
for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, receiving income replacement
benefits for a period of not less than three months under an accident and health
plan covering Monsanto employees.  The initial determination of
whether Mr. Grant is disabled and any subsequent determination as to whether Mr.
Grant continues to be disabled shall be made in accordance with the foregoing
criteria by medical advisors selected by Monsanto.

      


      NO
OTHER BENEFIT

      


      Mr. Grant
shall not be eligible for any other benefit under the TCN Plan, including,
without limitation, any retirement or death benefit.

      


      



      
        
           


        

        
           


          
            

          

        

        
           


        

      


      


      MONSANTO
COMPANY:

      


      
        	
                /s/
      Steven C. Mizell

              	 
      	
                8/8/08

              
	
                Name:  Steven
      C. Mizell

              	 
      	
                Date:

              
	
                Title:  Executive
      Vice President,

                Human
      Resources

              	 
      	 
      


      

      


      


      CONSENT
TO AMENDMENT:

      


      
        	
                /s/
      Hugh Grant

              	 
      	
                8/11/08

              
	
                Hugh
      Grant

              	 
      	
                Date:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:12-cr-247

Matthew Edward Williams 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 18) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: January 4, 2013 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cr-00247-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 01/04/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Sharing our world through talented hands

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Sharing our world through talented hands 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Office of Educational Research and ImprovementGriffin, Brian A., 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Office of Educational Research and Improvement 
                    -           Description        
                    -  artwork by Brian A. Griffin 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program (U.S.) 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; 103; Defense billboard (1988) ; # 103. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  035753797.jpg; 035753797.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit
      10.21

    Feed
      Purchase Contract

    


    Party
      A:
      Weifang Taihong Feed Co., Ltd

    Party
      B:
      Weifang Yuhe Poultry Co., Ltd

    


    This
      contract is signed on a friendly negotiation and equality basis by and between
      the aforementioned parties:

    


    
      	
              1,

            	
              Party
                B shall buy all necessary feed from Party A; Party A shall offer
                a
                preferential price for Party B.

            


    

    


    
      	
              2,

            	
              Party
                A shall provide feed in accordance with the nutrient demands of Party
                B’s
                flocks. Party B has the right to test the nutrient ingredients Party
                A’s
                provided feed.

            


    

    


    
      	
              3,

            	
              Term
                of this contract: During the term from January 1st,
                2006 to December 31st, 2008, Party B shall place purchase orders
                in
                accordance with its operating
                demands.

            


    

    


    
      	
              4,

            	
              Place:
                Weifang Taihong Feed Co., Ltd

            


    

    


    
      	
              5,

            	
              Delivery
                of feed: Party A shall deliver the feed to appointed breeding farms
                of
                Party B.

            


    

    


    
      	
              6,

            	
              Payment:
                The feed shall be paid for in cash or through the banking
                system.

            


    

    


    
      	
              7,

            	
              Violations
                of this contract: In the event that Party A fails to provide feed
                in due
                time, which leads to Party B’s great loss, Party A should compensate for
                Party B’s losses by deducting the losses from payments of the feeds.
                Should Party B violates any provisions of this contract, party A
                can at
                any time stop the feed supply, or revoke this contract.
                

            


    

     

    
      	
              8,

            	
              This
                contract shall come into effectiveness after signature by both parties.
                This contract is made in two original copies, with one to be held
                by each
                party.

            


    

    


    Party
      A:
      Weifang Taihong Feed Co., Ltd

    Representatives:
      Wang Jianbo

    Party
      B;
      Weifang Yuhe Poultry Co., Ltd

    Representatives:
      Han Chengxiang

    


    Date:
      January 1st,
      2006
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 30432 Summary Calendar

ULYSSES HILL ,
P etitioner

- Appellant

v. DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY , Responde nt

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:18

- CV

- 249

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ulysses Hill, Louisiana prisoner # 336638, was convicted of second

degree murder and sentenced to serve life in prison. Now, following the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition, he moves this court for a certificate of appealability (COA) on claims concerning ineffecti ve assistance of counsel, evidentiary sufficiency, and a fair trial.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 30, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30432 Document: 00515400425 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2020No. 19

- 30432

2 To obtain a COA, one must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). To satisfy that burden, he must show that “reasonable jurists wou ld find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), or that the issues he presents “are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further,” Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S . 322, 336 (2003). Because Hill fails to make the required showing with respect to the
above

- listed claims, his COA motion is DENIED. See id. Finally, Hill contends that the district court erred by denying his § 2254 petition without conducting an evide ntiary hearing. He is not required to obtain a COA to appeal the denial of an evidentiary hearing; therefore, to the extent he seeks a COA on this issue we construe his COA request “as a direct appeal from the denial of an evidentiary hearing.” Norman v. Stephens , 817 F.3d 226, 234 (5th Cir. 2016). Hill has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in denying his request for an evidentiary hearing. See Cullen v.
Pinholster , 563 U.S. 170, 185

- 86 (2011); Blue v. Thaler , 665 F.3d 647, 655

- 56 (5th Cir. 2011); § 2254(d), (e)(2). T he district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing is AFFIRMED. Case: 19-30432 Document: 00515400425 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/30/2020
,,\

. 

Qlante 


1Doran 


••• c Y t"} 

(~ .. 

March 19,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 


United. States Department of Transportation_ 


1200 New Jersey Avenue,SE 


Washington, DC 20590 


Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf ofPlante & Moran, PLLC, I am writing to express our strong support for the 

application of Delta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many 

corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are almost 250 Japanese 

companiesJocated in Indiana and hundreds more whose business activities rely on access to 

Japan and its market. The growth of our business ties with Japan has created demand for 

increased capacity to Tokyo. Indiana corporate representatives look to the convenience of flying 

into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Indianapolis does not offer international service to Asia, and many of our business 

travelers use Detroit as their hub when flying to Japan. Detroit is a proven and successful 

gateway to Asia and is an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is 

adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to 

.-~~.. makeTfthe airlIne 'sgafeway .toAsia.Tlie. addrtiOff-()fHaneda asa destination is a natural· fit that·· 

would clearly benefit our region. 

Thank you for consideration of this request. 

Sincerely, . 

~4// ..3J .. ... .... 

BlakeM.Roe 

Plante & Moran, PLLC 

Illinois Chicago' Elgin Michigan Ann Arbor' Auburn Hills' Detroit. East Lansing 

Flint· Grand Rapids • Kalamazoo' Macomb' St. Joseph' Southfield' Traverse City 

Ohio Cleveland' Columbus' Toledo China Shanghai Mexico Monterrey plantemoran.com