alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 8.1



List of Subsidiaries



|Name of Subsidiary                  |  | Jurisdiction             |  | Ownership Interest |    
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------ | ---
|                                    |  |                          |  |                    |    
|SodaStream Enterprises N.V.         |  | Netherlands Antilles     |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream International B.V.       |  | The Netherlands          |  |                    | 100
|Soda-Club Worldwide B.V.            |  | The Netherlands          |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream GmbH                     |  | Germany                  |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream Industries Ltd.          |  | Israel                   |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream Israel Ltd.              |  | Israel                   |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream Österreich GmbH          |  | Austria                  |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream Australia PTY Ltd.       |  | Australia                |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream (New Zealand) Ltd.       |  | New Zealand              |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream (SA) (Pty) Ltd.          |  | South Africa             |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream USA, Inc.                |  | Delaware (United States) |  |                    | 100
|Soda-Club CO2 Ltd.                  |  | British Virgin Islands   |  |                    | 100
|Soda-Club (Europe) Limited          |  | United Kingdom           |  |                    | 100
|Soda-Club Switzerland GmbH          |  | Switzerland              |  |                    | 100
|Soda-Club (CO2) SA                  |  | Switzerland              |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream (CO2) SA                 |  | Switzerland              |  |                    | 100
|Soda-Club (CO2) Atlantic GmbH (LLC) |  | Switzerland              |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream (Switzerland) AG         |  | Switzerland              |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream Nordics AB               |  | Sweden                   |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream Professional S.R.L.      |  | Italy                    |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream Canada Ltd.              |  | Canada                   |  |                    | 100
|SodaStream K.K.                     |  | Japan                    |  |                    | 100
#### Lyman H. Granger, *Appellant, v.*Henry H. Craig, Respondent.

Motion to modify order of last General Term denied, without costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                     Advisory Committee for International Science and Engineering (#25104).                 

*Date/Time:*                     May 4, 2007; 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.                 

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 950, Arlington, Virginia.                 

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open (Teleconference).                 

*Contact Person:*                     Eduardo Feller, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8710.                 

                    If you are attending the meeting and need access to the NSF, please contact the individual listed above so your name may be added to the building access list.                           ( print page 18691)    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice concerning the NSF programs in international science and engineering.                 

*Agenda:*                     Discussion of current programs, initiatives and future budget cycle.                 

Dated: April 10, 2007. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer. 

 [FR Doc. E7-7011 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
For more, visit www.fra.dot.gov 

Blocked Crossings Fast Facts 

Office of Railroad Safety December 2023

In December 2019, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) established a webpage for the 

public and law enforcement to report blocked highway-rail grade crossings. 

Blocked crossings occur when stopped trains impede the flow of motor vehicle or pedestrian 

traffic at railroad tracks for extended periods of time. Blocked crossings pose potential safety 

risks: frustrated individuals may be tempted to crawl between stopped railcars, and blocked 

crossings can hinder emergency services’ access to individuals and hospitals. 

Communities have long dealt with the issue of blocked crossings, and any regulations regarding 

blocked crossings are at the state or local level. FRA has no regulatory authority; thus, it focuses 

on providing data, investigating crossings that have 3 different incidents in a 30-day window, 

and facilitating local solutions with railroads and local authorities. 

The data collected from the webpage helps FRA to identify where chronic problems exist and to 

better assess the underlying causes and overall impacts of blocked crossings. The FRA Blocked 

Crossing webpage, www.fra.dot.gov/blockedcrossings, requests specific information from users 

reporting blocked crossings such as date, time, location, and duration. It is not to be used to 

report emergencies at crossings. 

Data Highlights from December 20, 2019 to December 31, 2023

• Reports, incidents, investigations:

o 82,290 total reports received

o 62,862 incidents at 13,706 crossings

o 906 investigations performed

• Top 4 railroads reporting incidents:

25,331 

o Norfolk Southern 19,108

o 

o BNSF Railway

15,364

8,714

• Top 5 states reporting incidents:

14,496

11,165

9,159

5,824

o Union Pacific Railroad

o CSX Transportation

o Texas

o Ohio

o Illinois

o Indiana

o Iowa 3,659

State Laws 

For information on states’ statutory provisions concerning blocked crossings, visit Compilation 

of State Laws - 7th Edition-eLibrary.pdf (dot.gov)
No. 54807.

#### Acme Ring Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 138355-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones or semiprecious stones, cut but not set, suitable for use in the manufacture of jewelry, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
Exhibit 15.3



LOGO

29 June, 2012

Sky-mobi Limited

10/F, Building B, United Mansion

No. 2, Zijinghua Road

Hangzhou, Zhejiang
310013

Peoples Republic of China

Dear Sirs,

Sky-mobi Limited (the Company)

Annual Report on Form 20-F

We hereby
consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 March 2012 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come
within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act, or the Rules and Regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|Yours faithfully,                          
|                                           
|/s/ Conyers Dill & Pearman (Cayman) Limited
|Conyers Dill & Pearman (Cayman) Limited
Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 1 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 2 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 3 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 4 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 5 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 6 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 7 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 8 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 9 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 10 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 11 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/04/12 Page: 12 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T16:57:07-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
[Cite as Hinkston v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. , 2010-Ohio-3743.] 

# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

MARK HINKSTON

Plaintiff

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION

Defendant

Case No. 2008-09490

Judge Clark B. Weaver Sr. Magistrate Matthew C. Rambo

JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶ 1} On June 10, 2010, the magistrate issued a decision recommending
judgment for defendant.
{¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to
a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not
the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by
Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” No objections were filed.
{¶ 3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident
on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s
decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of
law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are
assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment
and its date of entry upon the journal.Case No. 2008-09490 - 2 - JUDGMENT ENTRY

_____________________________________ CLARK B. WEAVER SR. Judge

cc:

Douglas R. Folkert A ssistant Attorney General 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 Mark Hinkston, #545-518 878 Coitsville-Hubbard Road Youngstown, Ohio 44505

MR/cmd Filed July 20, 2010 To S.C. reporter August 11, 2010
#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6659.

Entry No. 754425, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, April 27, 1942, etc.

Certified May 2, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 11, 1942, etc.

(Decided December 20, 1946)

*John R. Rafter*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2008180EN.01000701.xml

| 17.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 July 2008

(2008/C 180/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5888 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 165,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4587 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79395 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5163 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6040 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 124,08 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0660 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,213 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 232,37 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7029 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,2217 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5935 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,302 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9303 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6270 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5920 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,3906 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0591 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1435 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 603,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,1245 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,8218 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2259 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 523,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1279 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 72,235 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,8453 |
| THB | Thai baht | 53,157 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5310 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3527 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5888

JPY

Japanese yen

165,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4587

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79395

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5163

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6040

ISK

Iceland króna

124,08

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0660

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,213

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

232,37

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7029

PLN

Polish zloty

3,2217

RON

Romanian leu

3,5935

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,302

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9303

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6270

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5920

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,3906

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0591

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1435

KRW

South Korean won

1 603,50

ZAR

South African rand

12,1245

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,8218

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2259

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 523,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1279

PHP

Philippine peso

72,235

RUB

Russian rouble

36,8453

THB

Thai baht

53,157

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5310

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3527

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Texas
Eastern Transmission Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000097432
<NAME> TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,000
<PP&E>                                       3,583,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,018,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,374,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          314,000
<BONDS>                                      1,156,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,157,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,374,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               671,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  254,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                248,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    95,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            153,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   153,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>

<FN>
<F1>Not meaningful since Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation is a
wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 10240)

#### Standard Brands Paint Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. DE-57525, etc.

(Decided May 7, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Edward, N. Glad*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*William H. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(James IP. O’Hara,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

On call of these cases at the term of court in Los Angeles on February 2,1962, counsel stipulated, in open court, that the merchandise covered by the entries in the appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, attached to and made a part of this decision, was entered after February 27, 1958, and was not on the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521, under section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, T.D. 54165. The cases were then submitted on a further written stipulation of counsel for the parties, which was filed of record, as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are limited to the merchandise shipped by Nihon Chikuzai Kogei Co. Ltd., T. HigaM & Co. Ltd., and Toyo Mokko Co. Ltd. of Japan.

> 2. That the said merchandise was appraised under Section 402(b) of the Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, 2nd Session.

> 3. That at the time of exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, were the unit invoiced values net packed.

Accepting these two stipulations as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the.Customs Simplification Act of 1956, supra, is the proper basis for. determination of the values of the merchandise shipped by Nihon Chikuzai Kogei Co., Ltd., T. Higaki & Co., Ltd., and Toyo Mokko Co., Ltd., of Japan, described *640in the invoices covered by the entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values of the respective items of merchandise are the unit invoice values, net, packed, as shown on the invoices which are included in the official papers filed with the court in the several suits.

As to all other merchandise, these appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Webinar Attendees: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Announcement of Public Meeting Regarding Energy Conservation Standards forASHRAE EquipmentMeeting Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2012Name Title Organization Street CityStateZip Phone Fax EmailAndersen, Eric S Mechanical Engineer/ ManagerProject Manager Energy &Environment DirectoratePacific Northwest NationalLaboratory (PNNL)902 Battelle BoulevardP.O. Box 999MSIN K5-22Richland WA 99352 509-375-2735 N/A eric.andersen@pnl.govBallo, Timothy Associate Attorney Earthjustice 1625 MassachusettsAvenue NWSuite 702Washington DC 20036 202-667-4500 202-667-2356 tballo@earthjustice.orgCase, David Trial Attorney General Counsel 1000 Independence AveS.W.Washington DC 20585 N/A N/A david.case@hq.doe.govKolandayan, Dominic Regulatory Engineer Daikin AC (Americas), Inc. 1645 Wallace Dr, Suite110Carrollton TX 75006 717-650-6569 972-245-1038 dominic.kolandayan@daikinac.comLin, Paul Regal Beloit Manager, Corporate EnergyMarketing Programs8130 Quincy Court Fort Wayne IN 46835 260-416-5472 260-416-5499 paul.lin@regalbeloit.comSwink, Matthew Paralegal Specialist U.S. Department of JusticeAntitrust Division450 Fifth Street NWSuite 8000Washington DC 20530 202-514-0986 202-616-2441 mateoswink@hotmail.comWestphalen, Detlef Associate Director Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 S. Bedford StreetSuite 400Burlington MA 01803-5154 781-270-8360 781-270-0418 detlef.westphalen@navigantconsulting.comWilson, Linda Environmental Scientist New York State Office of theAttorney General120 Broadway New York NY 10271 212-416-8948 212-416-6007 Linda.Wilson@ag.ny.govWoodford, Michael Vice President, Standards Air-Conditioning, Heating &Refrigeration Institute (AHRI)2111 Wilson BoulevardSuite 500Arlington VA 22201 703-600-0328 703-528-3816 mwoodford@ahrinet.org
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

RONNIE D. GASTON, 

 CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00583 

 Petitioner, CRIM. NO. 2:12-CR-00030 

 JUDGE JAMES L. GRAHAM 

 v. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 On August 19, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant 

to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings recommending that this action be 

dismissed. (ECF No. 40.) Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the 

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no 

objections have been filed. 

 The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 40) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This 

action is hereby DISMISSED. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: September 13, 2016 

 ______s/James L. Graham ___ 

 JAMES L. GRAHAM 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cr-00030-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 41 Filed: 09/13/16 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>