alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 38991.

Suit 4109.

#### *Faber, Coe & Gregg, Inc.*v. *United States.*

T. D. 48882 affirmed.
Before the Second Division,

June 15, 1960

No. 64297.

protest 59/26673 (New York).

#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 49333.

#### Protests 902618-G, etc., of Musolina LoConte Co. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and cited cases the following allowances were made by the court to compensate for the weight of the foreign substances on the outside of certain cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for cheese similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146 and 41794; (2) 1 percent for that similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 id. 270, C. D. 706); and (3) an allowance was also made for the weight of the paper, or foil, or both, in which certain cheese was wrapped, following *Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(T. D. 47955). These claims were therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<CIK>             0000096412
<NAME>            TASTY BAKING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             Dec-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-23-2000
<CASH>                                           31
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                27,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (2,977)
<INVENTORY>                                   6,137
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             33,090
<PP&E>                                      176,524
<DEPRECIATION>                             (116,380)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              118,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        16,113
<BONDS>                                      21,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      4,558
<OTHER-SE>                                   44,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                118,121
<SALES>                                     121,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            122,889
<CGS>                                        78,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                78,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              5,582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               8,735
<INCOME-TAX>                                  5,638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           5,368
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  5,368
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.72


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LISA GAY ROBERTSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 366 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LISA GAY ROBERTSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 367 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Appendix A-4 

Detour Routes
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                           TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  Exhibit 27, Financial Data Schedule to Report
                         on Form 10Q, November 30, 2000
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            May-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                 Nov-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2,527,532
<SECURITIES>                                   2,605,877
<RECEIVABLES>                                 16,222,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                     173,264
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              21,348,475
<PP&E>                                           819,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                   639,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                21,810,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,170,631
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          60,783
<OTHER-SE>                                    16,579,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  21,810,664
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              41,135,503
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 32,002,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,602,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,780,175
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,646,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,134,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,134,175
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.47



</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9300)

#### E. Sidney Stockwell Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 12341.

(Decided January 20, 1959)

*Henry L. Ziegel*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. FitzGibbon,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The proper dutiable value of certain transparent quartz glass tubing imported from England is the subject of this appeal for a reappraisement.

At the call of this case for hearing, the parties hereto entered into an oral stipulation of fact whereby it was agreed as to the 20 meters of transparent quartz glass tubing that, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, at a price of 63 shillings per foot, plus cost of packing and case, and that the export value was no higher for such or similar merchandise.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(c)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis of value for the merchandise in issue and *450that said value is 63 shillings per foot, plus cost of packing and case As to any other merchandise, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-380-000]


Horizon Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Refund Report

April 4, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, Horizon Pipeline Company, 
L.L.C. (Horizon) filed its Refund Report regarding the penalty 
revenues, for the period January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006, 
that it refunded to its customers pursuant to Section 10.7 of the 
General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 
No. 1.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated 
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve 
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f191a0d1c10313336313a0c2a2f2f302d2b1f393a2d3c71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52141700111d3c3e3b3c37012722223d202612343720317c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time April 11, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6682 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibt
        4.10

    

     

    REVOLVING
      LOAN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
      FOUR

     

    Amendment
      Date: June
      20,
      2008

     

    Amended
      Credit Limit: $50,000.00            

     

    RFG
      Acquisition II Inc., a Delaware corporation, promises to pay JOHN W. BRANCH
      (“Lender”), an individual, the amended sum of FIFTY THOUSAND and 00/100 DOLLARS
      ($50,000.00) (the “Amended Credit Limit”) or such other principal amount that
      may be outstanding, in no case to exceed the Amended Credit Limit, as evidenced
      by the books and records of the Lender. 

     

    This
      Amendment Four hereby amends the Credit Limit as defined in the Revolving Loan
      Agreement, dated November 20, 2006, as amended, by and among RFG Acquisition
      II
      Inc. and John W. Branch. All other terms and conditions of the original
      Revolving Loan Agreement, dated November 20, 2006, as amended, remain unchanged
      and in full force and effect.

    


    This
      Amendment Four is effective as of the date listed above.


    
      


      
        	
                RFG
                  Acquisition II Inc.  

                 

                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                By:
                  

              	
                /s/ David
                  W. Matre

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
              
	
                 

              	
                David
                  W. Matre

                Chief
                  Financial Officer

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 
	
                 

              	
              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 


      

       

      
        	
                “Lender”   

                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                 

              	
                /s/ 
                  John W. Branch

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
              
	
                 

              	
                JOHN
                  W. BRANCH, an individual

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 
	
                 

              	 	
                 

              	
                 

              	 


      

    

    


    


    DO
      NOT DESTROY THIS ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
No. 44157.

#### Protest 995526-G of National Carloading Corporation (New York).

*288Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *American Push Broom & Brush Co.*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 248, T. D. 49391) textile grasses or fibrous substances were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1684 as claimed.
Exhibit 32.1



      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



              In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thomas Industries Inc.
         (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003,
         as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
         (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
         Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
         1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that
         based on their knowledge the Report fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly
         represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
         results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
         in the Report.




         /s/ Timothy C. Brown
         ----------------------------------------
         Timothy C. Brown, Chief Executive Officer


         /s/ Phillip J. Stuecker
         ----------------------------------------
         Phillip J. Stuecker, Chief Financial Officer



         November 13, 2003
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the annual report of On the Move Systems Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended February 29, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert Wilson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: June 15, 2016BY: /s/ Robert WilsonRobert WilsonPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Director  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Equal employment opportunity

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Equal employment opportunity 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Health, Education, and WelfareUnited States. Office of Education. Women's Program 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Department of Health, Education, and WelfareUnited States. Office of Education. Women's Program 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1970-1980 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  172 × 56 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  index.cpd 

Part of: Equal employment opportunity (2 objects)     Next

Equal employment opportunity

Equal employment opportunity

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 32.1 – 906 Certification








LIBERATED ENERGY, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Liberated Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Pringle , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Frank Pringle


Frank pringle


Chief Executive Officer


and Chairman of the Board





November 20, 2013





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Liberated Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Liberated Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
A90A0331.

#### CRAWFORD v. MEYER.

(395 SE2d 327)

Cooper, Judge.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to appellee.

At the time of the automobile collision giving rise to this action, appellant and appellee were both employees of the same motel. Appellee finished her work shift, got in her car which was parked in the employer’s parking lot a few feet from the side door to the building in which she worked, backed her car out of the parking space and collided with appellant’s vehicle. Appellant, still working on her shift, had parked her car behind appellee’s car and was preparing to deliver some items inside the motel. Appellant filed a workers’ compensation claim and received benefits from the employer. In her motion for summary judgment, appellee contended that appellant was precluded by OCGA § 34-9-11 from further recovery from a fellow employee.

OCGA § 34-9-11 provides an exclusive remedy for claims as between employees of the same employer “when an injury arises out of and in the course of employment.” *Labelle v. Lister,*192 Ga. App. 464, 465 (1) (385 SE2d 118) (1989). “The period of employment generally includes a reasonable time for ingress to and egress from the place of work, while on the employer’s premises. [Cits.]” *Knight-Ridder Newspaper Sales v. Desselle,*176 Ga. App. 174, 175 (335 SE2d 458) (1985). A parking lot is a part of the employer’s premises and an employee “ ‘remains in the course of . . . employment’ during a reasonable time for egress. [Cit.] ” *Labelle,*supra at Division 1.

The affidavit, deposition, pleadings and responses of appellee state that appellee and appellant worked for the same employer, and although appellee was finished with her daily work shift, she was in a parking lot on her employer’s premises and the accident occurred within a reasonable time for appellee’s egress from her workplace. Appellant’s affidavit and deposition did not sufficiently rebut the appellee’s evidence. See *Evans v. Richardson,*189 Ga. App. 751 (5) (377 SE2d 521) (1989). Consequently, appellant’s exclusive remedy is pursuant to OCGA § 34-9-11 and the trial court did not err in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment.

*868Decided June 8, 1990.

*James R. Jester,*for appellant.

*McClain & Merritt, M. David Merritt,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Banke, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.*