alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Yummy Flies, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedure to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b.  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and
  d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 s/ Brian Yamauchi
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
unaudited financial statements contained in the Company's Form 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                               13563040
<SECURITIES>                         2178277 
<RECEIVABLES>                        53255
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     15794572
<PP&E>                               907530
<DEPRECIATION>                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       25565159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                760355
<BONDS>                              0
<COMMON>                             524157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                           20740627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         25565159
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     892525
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        407604 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      478245
<INCOME-TAX>                         180000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  298245
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0 
<CHANGES>                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                         298245
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1 – 906 Certification








LIBERATED ENERGY, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Liberated Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10 -K/A for the year ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Pringle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.




By: /s/ Frank Pringle


Frank pringle


Chief Executive Officer


and Chairman of the Board





March 18 , 2014





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Liberated Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Liberated Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO, President and Chairman of Brenham Oil & Gas, Inc., a Texas corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Annual Report of Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013. 

 

 

The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of Brenham Oil & Gas, Inc. and results of its operations.

 

Date: April 15, 2014

Daniel Dror

Chairman

/s/ Daniel Dror
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsJIMMY R. CRAWFORD, JR.

________________________________

Case No. 2:12-cr-005 (1)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to

Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one (1)

of the Information. After examining the Defendant under oath

concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that

the defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed plea,

that the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that the

offenses charged are supported by an independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements of such offense. 

 I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of

guilty should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty

and sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be

rejected and the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty

plea. 

The Defendant remains in the custody of the U.S. Marshal pending

sentencing. 

Date: January 13, 2012 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and

Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and

Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28

U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).

Case: 2:12-cr-00005-JLG Doc #: 25 Filed: 01/13/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RICHARD J. MACKENSWORTH, Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 298, 24 CMR 108

No. 10,361

Decided October 4, 1957

*299
      *First Lieutenant Lawrence R. Fullem*and *First Lieutenant Gerald G. Barton*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Captain Thomas J. Nichols*was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

HomeR FERGUSON, Judge:

The issue upon which review was granted in this case has already been decided adversely to the Government. United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382; United States v Burgess, 8 USCMA 163, 23 CMR 387. The instruction condemned in those cases is present in the instant case. Accordingly, the findings of guilt of the offense of desertion must be set aside. The record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence, or it may order a rehearing on the principal charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Judge LatimeR dissents.
(Reap. Dec. 9760)

#### Fintimex, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. C-13295, etc.

(Decided August 4, 1960)

*Wallace <& Schwarts: {Joseph Schwarts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Q-eorge Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *{Sheila N. Ziff,*trial attorney) , for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule for decision upon stipulation on the basis of which I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), as amended, of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the plywood imported from Finland involved, and that such value in each case was the appraised value, less 4 per centum.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Sharkey, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.


/s/ John G. Sharkey
---------------------------------
Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
January 5, 2007
No. 39004.

#### Protest 885812-G of Arundell Clark, Ltd. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was found that each piece of cotton cloth was wrapped in paper upon which appeared the name of the country of origin of the cloth and that they were enclosed in a bale which was not marked. The paper wrappers were found to be the immediate containers of the cotton cloth. Abstracts 31872, *34032579, 32564, 32829, 34269, 34320, 33289, 34432, 35199, and *City of Paris Dry Goods Co.*v. *United States*(T. D. 45638) cited. The protest was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 33.1
  CERTIFICATION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA
  1.          BMW Financial Services NA, LLC (“BMW FS”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as of December 31, 2010 (the “Reporting Period”), as set forth in Appendix A hereto.  The transactions covered by this report include asset-backed securities transactions for which BMW FS acted as servicer involving motor vehicle leases for automobiles(the “Platform”);
  2.          BMW FS has engaged certain vendors (the “Vendors”) to perform specific, limited or scripted activities, and BMW FS elects to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria or portion of the servicing criteria applicable to such Vendors’ activities as set forth in Appendix A hereto;
  3.          Except as set forth in paragraph 4 below, BMW FS used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;
  4.          The criteria listed in the column titled “Inapplicable Servicing Criteria” on Appendix A hereto are inapplicable to BMW FS based on the activities it performs, directly or through its Vendors, with respect to the Platform;
  5.          BMW FS has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2010 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole;
  6.          BMW FS has not identified and is not aware of any material instance of noncompliance by the Vendors with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2010 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole;
  7.          BMW FS has not identified any material deficiency in its policies and procedures to monitor the compliance by the Vendors with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2010 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole; and
  8.          JH Cohn LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on BMW FS’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Reporting Period.
  
 Date: March 28, 2011                                                                                      By: /s/ Martin Stremplat
 Martin Stremplat
 Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              14,268
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                           662
<INVENTORY>                                         19,305
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    62,093
<PP&E>                                              76,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                      43,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     287,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               30,954
<BONDS>                                             40,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            17,551
<OTHER-SE>                                         188,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       205,960
<SALES>                                            133,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   133,624
<CGS>                                               85,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       85,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        86
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     32,739
<INCOME-TAX>                                        12,836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 19,903
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        19,903
<EPS-BASIC>                                         1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.23



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN MCPHAUL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CR-95-22-BO, CA-96-127-BO)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John McPhaul, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Elaine Tompkins, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John McPhaul seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McPhaul, Nos. CR-95-22-BO; CA-96-127-

BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2008138EN.01000201.xml

| 5.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 June 2008

(2008/C 138/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5466 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 161,82 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4586 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,7902 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3448 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6037 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 119,48 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9755 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,67 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 242,7 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7006 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,3763 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6276 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,325 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,92 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,61 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,561 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,0754 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,974 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1081 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 575,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,0403 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7319 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2497 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 407,35 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0179 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,996 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,75 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,574 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5271 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,9609 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5466

JPY

Japanese yen

161,82

DKK

Danish krone

7,4586

GBP

Pound sterling

0,7902

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3448

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6037

ISK

Iceland króna

119,48

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9755

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,67

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

242,7

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7006

PLN

Polish zloty

3,3763

RON

Romanian leu

3,6276

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,325

TRY

Turkish lira

1,92

AUD

Australian dollar

1,61

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,561

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,0754

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,974

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1081

KRW

South Korean won

1 575,99

ZAR

South African rand

12,0403

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7319

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2497

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 407,35

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0179

PHP

Philippine peso

67,996

RUB

Russian rouble

36,75

THB

Thai baht

50,574

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5271

MXN

Mexican peso

15,9609

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Case: 2:11-cv-00592-EAS-MRA Doc #: 25 Filed: 08/14/12 Page: 1 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00592-EAS-MRA Doc #: 25 Filed: 08/14/12 Page: 2 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00592-EAS-MRA Doc #: 25 Filed: 08/14/12 Page: 3 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00592-EAS-MRA Doc #: 25 Filed: 08/14/12 Page: 4 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-07T20:16:32-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
ex10_2.htm


    Exhibit
      10.2

    
      
      

       

      

        AMENDMENT
          NO. 1 TO THE

        EMPLOYMENT
          AGREEMENT

        


        This
          AMENDMENT NO.
          1 TO
          EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the
          “Amendment”) is made effective this July 10, 2008, amends that certain
          Employment Agreement, dated December 28, 2007, by and between America West
          Resources, Inc. (the “Employer”) and Dan Baker (“Executive”). 

        


        WHEREAS,
          the
          Employer and Executive have agreed to make certain changes to the Employment
          Agreement; 

        


        NOW,
          THEREFORE, in consideration of the above,
          and for other good
          and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
          acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

         

        1. Section
          3.A of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety and replaced
          with the following:

        


        “A.
          Capacity.  The
          Executive shall serve in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer of the
          Employer.  The Executive shall perform the duties ordinarily expected
          of a Chief Executive Officer and shall also perform such other duties consistent
          therewith as the Board of Directors of the Employer shall, from time to
          time,
          reasonably determine.” 

         

         

         

        IN
          WITNESS WHEREOF,
          each of the parties hereto has executed this Amendment or has caused this
          Amendment to be executed on its behalf by a representative duly authorized,
          all
          as of the date first above set forth. 

         

        
          	 	
                  America
                    West Resources, Inc.

                
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	
                  By:

                	
                  /s/
                    BRIAN RODRIGUEZ

                
	 	
                  Name:

                	
                  Brian
                    Rodriguez

                
	 	
                  Title:

                	
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer

                
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	
                  /s/
                    DAN BAKER

                
	 	
                  Dan
                    Baker