alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                        TRANSAMERICA FINANCE CORPORATION
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I, ROBERT A. WATSON, certify that:

1)   I have reviewed this quarterly report of Transamerica Finance Corporation;

2)   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5)   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control.

         /S/  ROBERT A. WATSON             Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
------------------------------------------
              (Robert A. Watson)

Date:    August 8, 2003
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

November 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00500

- CR

Edward ROMERO

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR3128 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s n otice of appeal was fi led with this court on July 17, 2014

, and the appellate record was complete on September 29, 2014

. Accordingly, A ppellant ’ s brief was due to be filed
with this court not later than October 29, 2014

. On November 3, 2014, we notified Appellant’s attorney that the brief was late and requested a response within ten days of the notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time

. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant ’ s a ttorney to either file the appellant ’ s brief or a motion to dismiss this appeal within ten days of the date of this order . If no brief or motion is filed by that date, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2). Appellant’s attorney is cautioned that , to protect appellant’s rights, this court may “ initiat [ e ] c ontempt proceedings against appellant’s counsel .” Id. R. 38.8(b)(4).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of November, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT HCIRCUIT
RE SIL IE NT FL O O R CO V E RING PE NSIO N T RUST FUND B O ARD O F T RUST E E S; RE SIL IE NT FL O O R CO V E RING

PE NSIO N T RUST FUND, Pla i ntiffs-Appe lla

nts,
v. M ICH AE L ’S FL O O R CO V E RING , INC., De fe nda

nt-Appe l le e . No. 16-16749 D.C . No. 3:11-c v-05200-JSC
M E M O RANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Ja c que line Sc ott C orle y , M a gistra te Judge , Pre s iding Argue d an d Submi tte d De c e m be r 5, 2017 San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : K O Z INSKI and H URW IT Z , C irc uit Judge s, a nd KE E L E Y , ** Distric t Judge
. 

# FIL ED DEC 18 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The Honora

ble Ire ne M . Ke e le y , Unite d Stat e s Distric t Judgefor the Northe rn Distric t of W e st Virginia , sitting by de signa tion.pa ge 2

1. The distric t c ourt didn’ t e rr in holding a ppe lla nts m ust show tha

t M ic ha e l’ s Floor C ove ring, Inc . (“ M FC ” ) ha d notic e of Stude r’ s Floor C ove ring Inc
. ’ s (“ SFC ” ) withdra

w a l lia bility prior to be c om ing SFC ’ s suc c e ssor to im pose withdra wa l lia bility on M FC
. Se e R e silient Floor C ove ring Pe nsion Tr. Fund B d. of Trs. v. M i c ha e l’ s Floor C ove ring, Inc ., 801 F.3d 1079, 1084 (9th C ir. 2015).
2. In e m ploy m e nt c a se s, “ [t] he princ iple[sic ] re a son for thenotic e re quire m e nt is to ensure fa irne ss by gua ra nte e ing tha

t a suc c e ssor ha d a

n opportunity

to prote c t a ga inst lia

bility by ne gotia ting a lowe r pric e or inde m

nity
c la use .” Ste inba c h v. Hubba rd, 51 F.3d 843, 847 (9th C i r. 1995). Appe lla nts
argue that M FC ha d suffic ie nt notic e be c a use it knew tha

t som e of SFC ’ s e m ploy e e s we re unioniz e d a nd SFC c ontribute d to a

pe n sion fund. Appe lla

nts a lso
c la im tha t M FC ha d notic e be c a

use a R e silient Floor C o ve ring Pe nsion Trust Fund truste e told M FC ’ s owne r that “ if thepe n sion wa s fully funde d a s of toda

y , I would go non-union the

ne xt da y . ” B ut this truste e wa s theowne r of an e ntire ly sepa rate busine ss in a

diffe re nt c ity

and the re ’ s no e vide nc e tha t he ha d a ny owne rship sta

ke in M FC or SFC . The se fa c t s fa il to show tha t M FC ha d notic e of SFC ’ s withdra wa l lia bility or “ ha d a

n opportunity

to prote c t a ga inst [it.] ” Id.
AFFIRM E D.
##### 



Exhibit 12
  COMPUTATION
    OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
  Three MonthsEndedMarch 31,


December 31,


December 31,


December 31,


December 31,


December 31,2008


2007


2006


2005


2004


2003(In thousands)Earnings before income taxes

$
56,367


$
263,891


$
233,442


$
175,860


$
127,830


$
47,745Add:Interest on indebtedness


13,465



33,311



29,227



36,234



34,227



39,324Amortization of debt expense


282



796



704



939



1,098



1,741Portion of rents representative of the interest factor


2,781



8,578



7,735



7,392



7,089



7,807Deduct:Undistributed earnings from less-than-50-percent-owned entities


(370
)


427



(61
)


(631
)


(1,055
)


(1,777
)Earnings (as defined)

$
72,525


$
307,003


$
271,047


$
219,794


$
169,189


$
94,840Fixed charges:Interest on indebtedness


13,465



33,311



29,227



36,234



34,227



39,324Amortization of debt expense


282



796



704



939



1,098



1,741Portion of rents representative of the interest factor


2,781



8,578



7,735



7,392



7,089



7,807Total fixed charges

$
16,528


$
42,685


$
37,666


$
44,565


$
42,414


$
48,872Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


4.4
x


7.2
x


7.2
x


4.9
x


4.0
x


1.9x
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v MILTON D. JONES, Sergeant First Class (E-6), U. S. Army, Appellant

12 USCMA 373, 30 CMR 373

No. 14,656

Decided April 28, 1961

*Lieutenant Colonel Ralph W. Wofford*and *First Lieutenant Alonzo F. Davis*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel James G. McConaughy, First Lieutenant Francis J. Larkin,*and *First Lieutenant Barry L, Kroll*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

*374Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. Latimer, Judge:’

Accused stands convicted for violations of Articles 107 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 907 and 934, respectively. His sentence, as affirmed by a board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General of the Army, extends to confinement at hard labor and partial forfeitures for twelve months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. He was tried by a general court-martial convened at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, and manned, in part, by the same members who sat on the trial of the case of United States v Danzine, 12 USCMA 350, 30 CMR 350, this day decided — another prosecution originating in the same command. We granted accused’s petition for review to consider essentially the same issue of alleged command influence as was involved in that case, and our holding there is controlling in this instance. Accordingly, the assignment of error is resolved adversely to accused.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Danzine, 12 USCMA 350, 30 CMR 350, this day decided.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the unaudited financial statements contained in the Company's Form
10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                               15,819,456
<SECURITIES>                         1,528,694
<RECEIVABLES>                        81,265
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     17,429,415
<PP&E>                               845,408
<DEPRECIATION>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       23,338,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                503,222
<BONDS>                              0
<COMMON>                             524,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<OTHER-SE>                           20,321,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         23,338,580
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     2,458,921
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        1,481,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      978,050
<INCOME-TAX>                         350,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  628,050
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                         628,050
<EPS-BASIC>                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0


</TABLE>
No. 44132.

#### Protest 998738-G of Rudolf Lesch Fine Arts, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial the protest was submitted without the introduction of evidence in support of the claims made. There being nothing in the record to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s decision, the protest was overruled.
Webinar Attendees: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Announcement of Public Meeting Regarding Energy Conservation Standards for ASHRAE Equip

Meeting Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax 

Andersen, Eric S Mechanical Engineer/ Manager

Project Manager Energy & Environment Directorate

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

902 Battelle BoulevardP.O. Box 999MSIN K5-22

Richland WA 99352 509-375-2735 N/A eric.ander

Ballo, Timothy Associate Attorney Earthjustice 1625 Massachusetts 

Avenue NWSuite 702

Washington DC 20036 202-667-4500 202-667-2356 tballo@ea

Case, David Trial Attorney General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave 

S.W.

Washington DC 20585 N/A N/A david.case

Kolandayan, Dominic Regulatory Engineer Daikin AC (Americas), Inc. 1645 Wallace Dr, Suite 

110

Carrollton TX 75006 717-650-6569 972-245-1038 dominic.ko

Lin, Paul Regal Beloit Manager, Corporate Energy 

Marketing Programs

8130 Quincy Court Fort Wayne IN 46835 260-416-5472 260-416-5499 paul.lin@r

Swink, Matthew Paralegal Specialist U.S. Department of Justice

Antitrust Division

450 Fifth Street NWSuite 8000

Washington DC 20530 202-514-0986 202-616-2441 mateoswin

Westphalen, Detlef Associate Director Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 S. Bedford Street

Suite 400

Burlington MA 01803-5154 781-270-8360 781-270-0418 detlef.wes

Wilson, Linda Environmental Scientist New York State Office of the 

Attorney General

120 Broadway New York NY 10271 212-416-8948 212-416-6007 Linda.Wils

Woodford, Michael Vice President, Standards Air-Conditioning, Heating & 

Refrigeration Institute (AHRI)

2111 Wilson BoulevardSuite 500

Arlington VA 22201 703-600-0328 703-528-3816 mwoodfor
Exhibit 31.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Douglas J. Pauls certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BankUnited, Inc.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and;  c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Douglas J.   PaulsDouglas J. PaulsChief Financial OfficerDate:   March 31, 2011
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# National Disability Employment Awareness Month

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  National Disability Employment Awareness Month 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  151 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  024606572.jpg; 024606572.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-61,204] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 27, 2007 in response to a worker petition filed a company official on behalf of workers at Gildan Activewear Malone, Inc., Bombay, New York. 

The petitioner has withdrawn the petition. Thus, this investigation is terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of April 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E7-7098 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended June 26, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter
ended June 26, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Transcat, Inc.
 Date: August 9, 2010
    
    /s/ Charles P. HadeedCharles P. HadeedPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Date: August 9, 2010
    
    /s/ John J. ZimmerJohn J. ZimmerVice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:12-cr-176

Anna M. Carter 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 21) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 2 of the indictment, and she is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: July 2, 2013 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cr-00176-JLG Doc #: 24 Filed: 07/02/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 48632.

#### Protests 939272-G, etc., of Kraft Phenix Cheese Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of Abstract 48269. The protests were therefore sustained.