alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________
No. 02

- 18

- 00273

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal f rom the 342nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 342

- 292449

- 17

Before Pittman , J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Bassel, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### C OLUMBIA 

### M EDICAL 

### C ENTER OF 

### A RLINGTON 

### S UBSIDIARY 

### L.P. D 

### / B 

### / A 

### M EDICAL 

### C ENTER 

### A RLINGTON 

### , C OLUMBIA 

### N ORTH 

### T EXAS 

### S UBSIDIARY 

### GP, L.L.C., M ERIDIAN 

### A RLINGTON 

### SNF, L.P. D 

### / B 

### / A 

### A RBROOK 

### P LAZA 

### , M ERIDIAN 

### HMG L ONG 

### T ERM 

### C ARE 

### , L.L.C., MAS G ENPAR 

### L.L.C., AND 

### HMG S ERVICES 

### , L.L.C.
, Appellants

V



### .

A NGELA 

### C ARTWRIGHT 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

### R EPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

### E STATE OF 

### C AROLYN 

### M ALLORY 

### , D ECEASED 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

We have considered “ Appellants Columbia Medical Center o f Arlington

Subsi diary, L.P. d/b/a M edical Center Arlington’s a nd Columbia North Texas
Subsidiary G P , L.L.C.’ s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal .” We grant the
motion and dismiss the appeal as to the Columbia Appellants only

. See Tex. R. App.
P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Thi s case shall hereafter be styled “ Meridian Arlington SNF, L.P. d/b/a Arbrook

Plaza, Meridian HMG Long Term Care, L.L.C., MAS Genpar L.L.C., and HMG Services,

L.L.C. v. Angela Cartwright, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Carolyn Mallory,

Deceased .”
The parties will be notified when a submission date has been set.
Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: June 6, 2019
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v THOMAS JAMES STANTON, Seaman Recruit, U. S. Navy, Appellant

16 USCMA 526, 37 CMR 146

No. 19,898

February 17, 1967

*Captain John P. Gleeson,*USN, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Edward A. Infante,*USNR, was on the pleadings for Ap-pellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Kilday, Judge:

Appellant was arraigned before a special court-martial convened at the U. S. Naval Station, Brooklyn, New York, charged with absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886. He pleaded guilty and was found guilty as charged. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, and a loss of two-thirds pay for three months. The convening authority thereafter approved only so much of the sentence as provided for bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, and forfeiture of $60.00 per month for three months. The officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction approved this action. A board of review in the office of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy affirmed the finding of.guilty and the sentence.

The president of this special court-martial neither instructed the court members as to the maximum imposable punishment, nor did he advise them that the bad-conduct discharge was imposable only because of two previous convictions. This was error.

In short, the defects found in this record are substantially identical to those found in United States v Turner, 9 USCMA 124, 25 CMR 386, and United States v Ferree, 16 USCMA 506, 37 CMR 126. Our opinions in those cases are controlling.

Accordingly, the petition for review is granted. The decision of the board of review as to the sentence is reversed and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for further action. A rehearing may be ordered on the penalty.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Ferguson concur.
No. 48017.

#### Petition 6312-R of Automatic Totalisators, Inc. (Tampa).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The petition was dismissed.
Case Wo. 14,582.

#### UNITED STATES v. BERNAL et al.

[1 Hoff. Land Gas. 99.] 1

District Court, N. D. California.

Dec. Term, 1855.

Mexican Land Grant — Validity op Grant.

No objection to this claim made by district attorney.

Claim [by Carmen Sibrian De Bernal] for a lot two hundred varas square in the county of San Francisco, confirmed by the board, and appealed by the United States.

S. W. Inge, U. S. Atty.

Halleek, Peachy & Billings, for appellees.

HOFFMAN. District Judge.

The claim in this case is for a solar in the Mission of Dolores. It appears to have been granted by Governor Figueroa on the recommendation of the priest of the Mission, and in consideration of services rendered to the Mission by the claimant as mayor domo. No argument was had in the case at the hearing, nor did the district attorney suggest any objection to the validity of the grant. The claim was confirmed by the board, and we think their decision, in the absence of any showing to the contrary on the part of the government, ought to be affirmed.
Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner March 4,'2008 Carol J. Holahan, Director Office of Legislative Services c/o Division of Administrative Rules 25 Capitol Street State House Annex, Room 219 Concord, New

Hampshire 03301-6312 Reference Doc. #7647; Env-Sw2100 (adopted as Env-Wm3900) Dear Director Holahan

: Pursuant to RSA 541-A :15, I-a, I hereby certify that the enclosed rules are the same in substance as the rules originally filed with the Office of Legislative Services, Division of Administrative Rules. I further certify that the enclosed rule(s), as edited for format by the Division of Administrative Rules, is the official version of these rules which this agency is required to publish in an 8 '/2 x 11 inch loose-leaf format as part ofthe New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules, under Chapter 5 of the New Hampshire Drafting andProcedure Manual for A*inistrative Rules and RSA,541-A:15, I . Sincerely, Thomas S. Burack Commissioner Enclosure CC' . Gretchen Hamel, DES Legal Unit DES Public Information Center .,Michael J . Wimsatt, DES WMD ec: Richard Head, Associate Attorney General The State of New

Hampshire . DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

DES Web site: www

.des.nh.gov P .O . Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095, Telephone: (603) 271-3503 " Fax: (603) 271-2867 - TDDAccess : Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of SodaStream International Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Birnbaum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





June 30, 2011





By:
/s/ Daniel BirnbaumName: Daniel BirnbaumTitle: Chief Executive Officer
No. 38995.

#### Protest 496975-G of Leonhardt & Brush (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
# C_2008268EN.01001501.xml

| 23.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/15

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/138/08

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2008/C 268/06)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition EPSO/AD/138/08 to constitute a reserve from which to recruit Maltese-language lawyer-linguists (AD 7).

The competition notice is published in Official Journal C 268 A of 23 October 2008 in English, French and German only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://europa.eu/epso

---
Exhibit No. 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Roy Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust,
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)               The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)              The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

| |  | TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST(Registrant)
| |  | ------------------------------------

|Date:  May 5, 2006 |  | By:/s/ Roy Thomas

   
  
Roy Thomas, General Agent and
   
  
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350,**  

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**  

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**  

In connection with the Annual Report of BrasilAgro—Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, André Guillaumon, Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Operating Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(i)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

  

October 19, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9198 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9198

    To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to utilize a risk-
 informed, performance-based licensing approach to the maximum extent 
    practicable for the purpose of expediting the nuclear licensing 
                    process, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2024

  Mr. Donalds (for himself, Mr. Nehls, and Mr. Williams of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to utilize a risk-
 informed, performance-based licensing approach to the maximum extent 
    practicable for the purpose of expediting the nuclear licensing 
                    process, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maximize Risk-Informed, Performance-
Based Licensing Act''.

SEC. 2. RISK-INFORMED, PERFORMANCE-BASED LICENSING.

    (a) Definition of Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework.--
Section 3(14) of the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act 
(42 U.S.C. 2215 note)--
            (1) by striking ``where appropriate'' and inserting ``to 
        the maximum extent practicable''; and
            (2) by inserting ``that are consistent with the 
        expectations, concepts, and definitions in the Staff 
        Requirements Memorandum from the Secretary of the Commission to 
        the Executive Director for Operations dated March 1, 1999, 
        regarding `Staff Requirements - SECY-98-144 - White Paper on 
        Risk-Informed and Performance-Based Regulation' (hereinafter 
        referred to as `SRM-SECY-98-144')'' after ``risk-informed and 
        performance-based techniques''.
    (b) Annual Training.--Section 103(a)(2) of the Nuclear Energy 
Innovation and Modernization Act (42 U.S.C. 2133 note) is amended by 
inserting ``, including annual training on the expectations, concepts, 
and definitions in SRM-SECY-98-144,'' after ``strategies''.
    (c) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that it is 
important that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the regulated 
community have a common understanding of how risk-informed and 
performance-based techniques are applied to Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission rulemaking, licensing, inspection, assessment, enforcement, 
and other decision-making processes.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 99.10



CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year
ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 40-F) of Timmins Gold Corp., I, Mani M.
Verma, Associate Engineer of Micon International Limited (Micon), hereby
consent to the use of my name and Micons name in connection with the references
to the mineral reserve and resource estimates for the San Francisco Project and
to the technical report entitled NI 43-101F1 Technical Report, Updated
Resources and Reserves and Mine Plan for the San Francisco Gold Project, Sonora,
Mexico dated December 6, 2013 (collectively, the Technical Information) and
to the incorporation by reference of references to, and summaries of, the
Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

MICON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

/s/ Mani M. Verma
Name: Mani M. VermaTitle: Associate Mining Engineer

March 25, 2015

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9322 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

675 Wolf Ledges Parkway in Akron, Ohio, as the ‘‘Judge James R. 

Williams Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 6, 2024 

Mrs. SYKES (for herself, Mr. LANDSMAN, Mr. WENSTRUP, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. 

JORDAN, Mr. LATTA, Mr. MILLER of Ohio, Mr. DAVIDSON, Ms. KAPTUR, 

Mr. TURNER, Ms. BROWN, Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. 

CAREY, Mr. RULLI, Ms. PLASKETT, Ms. MCCLELLAN, Ms. KAMLAGERDOVE, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. LEE of Pennsylvania, Mr. AMO, Mr. VEASEY, and Mr. NEGUSE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 675 Wolf Ledges Parkway in Akron, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Judge James R. Williams Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JUDGE JAMES R. WILLIAMS POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 675 Wolf Ledges Parkway in 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9322 IH

1 Akron, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge 

2 James R. Williams Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge James R. Wil7 liams Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,278,905
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,468,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,002,531
<PP&E>                                       4,774,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,550,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          772,566
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,550,134
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,494,689
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  456,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,038,605
<INCOME-TAX>                                   322,420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            716,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   716,185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit No. 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), David M. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Trust,
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

| |  | TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST  
               (Registrant)
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  May 10, 2005 |  | By:/s/ David M. Peterson
       David M. Peterson, Assistant General Agent and
       Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before the Third Division,

January 23, 1942

No. 46876.

#### Protest 956491-G of Geo. A. Hormel & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material surrounding the hams.
(Reap. Dec. 10226)

#### Romana Fashions, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 493372; 490431.

(Decided April 17, 1962)

*Sharretts, PaJley & Cm'teo'*for the plaintiff.

*’William. II. Orriolc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*624Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> XT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe parties hereto that the merchandise consists of wool or cotton wearing apparel exported from Italy.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing appraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise is not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above appeals for reappraisement are hereby submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value for the merchandise covered by these appeals was the invoice unit value, packed, in each case.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2008244EN.01001201.xml

| 25.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/12

---

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2007

(2008/C 244/04)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.eda.europa.eu/finance.aspx

---
#### Chas. F. King, Rec’r, etc., App’lt, *v.*John H. Walbridge *et al.,*Resp’ts.

*L. M. Brown,*for app’lt; *Edgrn' T. Brackett,*for resp’ts.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Affirming 16 N. Y. State Rep., 314.
Letter Agreement between the Company and John L. Armstrong, Jr.



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 [GENAERA LETTERHEAD] 
 May 27, 2008 
 John L. Armstrong, Jr. 
 c/o Genaera Corporation 
 5110 Campus Drive 
 Plymouth Meeting, PA 
 19462 
 Dear Jack: 
 In conjunction with Genaera’s
decision to implement initiatives designed to conserve cash into mid-2009, we have discussed and you have agreed, intending to be legally bound, to the following: 
  

	 	•	 	 A voluntary 10% reduction in base compensation. As such, effective June 1, 2008, your base salary will be $34,500.00 per month ($414,000/year); and



  

	 	•	 	 A voluntary forfeiture of cash incentives, including salary increases and discretionary bonus awards, for 2008. 


 Please indicate your agreement with these changes by signing in the space provided below. 
  

									
		 		 		 		 	Sincerely,
					
		 		 		 		 	 /s/ R. Frank Ecock

		 		 		 		 	R. Frank Ecock
		 		 		 		 	Compensation Committee Chair
	RFE/jlb	 		 		 		 	
					
	Accepted:	 	 /s/ John L. Armstrong, Jr.
	 		 	Date:	 	 May 28, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Jason Jones, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 2:11-cv-871

Warden Ross Correctional JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

Institution, et al., Magistrate Judge Kemp

 

Defendants. 

 

ORDER

This case is before the Court to consider a Report and Recommendation issued by the

Magistrate Judge on April 10, 2012. No objections have been filed to the Report and

Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss (#10) is granted in part and denied in part as follows. The motion

is granted as to all claims against Defendant Whitten, and granted as to the state law claim and

the claim for injunctive relief. The motion to dismiss is denied as to the remaining claims. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:11-cv-00871-GLF-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 05/04/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>