alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10234)

#### Standard Brands Paint Co., Inc., by Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., of L.A. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. DE-26833, etc.

(Decided April 23, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*William, 3. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, attached to and made a part of this decision, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are limited to the merchandise shipped by Hasegawa Shoten Go. of Japan.

> 2. That the said merchandise was appraised under Section 402, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938.

> 3. That no foreign value, as defined by Section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, existed for such or similar merchandise.

> 4. That at the time of exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, were the unit invoice values less the proportionate share of the inland freight, storage, hauling and lighterage, insurance premium and petty shown on the invoices to be included in the unit invoice values.

> 5. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A”, as heretofore limited, are submitted on this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for determination of the values of the merchandise shipped by Hasegawa Shoten Co. of Japan, described in the invoices covered by the entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values of the respective items of merchandise are the unit invoice values, less the proportionate share of the inland freight, storage, hauling and lighterage, insurance premium, and petties, all as shown on the invoices which are included in the official papers filed with the court in the several suits.

As to all other merchandise, these appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# CA2007316EN.01000401.xml

| 28.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 316/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 316/4

---

Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/105-107/07 to constitute a reserve of Heads of Unit (AD9 and AD12) in the field of translation who have Bulgarian and Romanian as their main language.

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 279 A of 22 November 2007
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 279 A of 22 November 2007

(2007/C 316 A/02)

On page 21, in Section I ‘Duties and elegibility’, in the last paragraph:

for:

for:

‘You may apply for only one competition and only one field.’,

read:

read:

‘You may apply for only one competition, one field and one grade.’.

---
www.oli.org

U.S. Department

of Transportation

Federal Railroad 

Administration

www.fra.dot.gov

Truck Driver Safety Alert!

Recent News:

“Truck Drivers at Risk on Railroad Crossings”

How to Cross Railroad Tracks Safely

As you approach the crossing:

< Never ignore flashing lights, whistles, closing gates, or stop signs.

< Slow down, look in both directions, and test your brakes.

< Be certain you don't see a train. Roll down windows; turn off fans and radios; listen for

warning whistles.

< If a stop is needed, stop no closer than 15 feet and no farther than 50 feet from the

tracks.

As you begin to cross:

< Never stop on the tracks—never enter a crossing unless you have enough space to fully

clear the tracks.

< If the gate comes down after you have started across, drive through the gate even if it

means breaking the gate—the gate is designed to break. 

If you get stuck on the tracks:

 Beware! Trailers with low ground clearance can get stuck on raised crossings.

 (A train and a low-ground-clearance trailer collide every two weeks!)

< Get out of the truck and quickly move away from the crossing in the direction of the

approaching train to avoid injury from debris.

< Immediately call the posted 1-800 number or 911 to alert police about the stalled vehicle

and ensure the railroad is contacted. Provide the exact location of the crossing, using

the DOT/AAR crossing number (see sample), which may be

posted on the crossbuck post or signal pole, box, or bungalow,

and the name of the road or highway which crosses the tracks.

Try to plan your route to avoid crossing railroad tracks.
New Federal statistics find that:

< More than nine times per week, a truck with a trailer and a train collide, and there are many

more near-hits than collisions.

Did you know:

< Nearly every 115 minutes, someone in America is hit by a train.

< Trains cannot stop quickly or steer out of the way.

< Trains appear to be approaching more slowly than their actual speed. Trust the warning

signals, not your senses.

< An average train of 6,000 tons traveling at 55 mph takes a mile or more to stop. 

< Nearly half of all collisions occur at railroad crossings equipped with properly functioning

automatic warning devices (flashing lights with bells or gates with lights and

bells)—these warning signals must be obeyed.

< A motorist is 40 times more likely to die when involved in a collision with a train than in a

collision with another motor vehicle.

Helpful Resources:

Federal Railroad Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office of Public Affairs (202) 493-6024

Federal Highway Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office of Public Affairs (202) 366-0660

Federal Transit Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office of Safety & Security (202) 366-2896

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration . . . Office of Public Affairs (202) 366-9550

Operation Lifesaver, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (800) 537-6224

American Trucking Associations . . . . . . . . . . . . . Safety Policy Department (703) 838-1847

WHEN APPROACHING ANY RAILROAD TRACKS

Always Expect A Train!
AVAQMD Rule 701 

### B

- 3 Final Staff Report , 0 8 / 21 /14
EX-32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Pantheon China Acquisition Corp. II (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles W. Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:    March 23, 2011





/s/ Charles W. AllenCharles W. AllenChief Financial Officer





1
Before the Second Division,

March 18, 1944

No. 49275.

#### Protest 102116-K of S. Lisk & Bro. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was found that the record fully supported the claim made and that the pencil sharpeners in question are similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 48152, which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained to this extent.
South Central 

Region

Federal Railroad 

Administration

Planning and Feasibility Studies

currently underway for several corridors

Safer Grade Crossings

and congestion mitigation in Texas

3% Ridership Increase

in the region since 2005

The South Central region is home to the nation’s 

4th and 5th largest metropolitan areas by 

population and is also a major freight hub, with 

multiple Class I railroads transporting freight to 

and from the ports of Galveston and New 

Orleans and across the Mexican border.

Infrastructure improvements to 15 rail segments 

will allow passenger trains to travel at higher 

speeds on the Texas portion of the route, 

resulting in up to 17 minutes of travel time 

savings.

Several corridors are being considered for new or 

expanded passenger rail service, including a 150 

mph route between Dallas and Houston that has 

strong private sector support.

The same infrastructure improvements will not 

only speed rail traffic, but also reduce the risk of 

dangerous accidents at grade crossings used by 

trucks and automobiles.

Increased Top Speeds

between Oklahoma City and Fort Worth
South Central Region

Federal Railroad Administration

Region Characteristics Route Diagram

Funding by Corridor and Source

+3%

Since 2005

National average:

+31%

FY05:

67,000

FY15:

69,000

Ridership Growth

Population

Economy

Land Area

Corridor Length 

(miles)

Investments $M 2009-2015

Federal Non-Federal Total

Dallas/Ft. Worth – Houston Varies $15 $0 $15 

Oklahoma City – Dallas/Ft. 

Worth – South Texas Varies $6 $1 $7

Oklahoma City - Fort Worth 206 $15 $15 $30 

Tulsa - Oklahoma City 110 $2 $1 $3 

Kansas City - Oklahoma City 400 $0 $0 $1 

Multiple Corridors Varies $35 $68 $103 

Other Corridors / Freight 

Investments n/a $46 $21 $67 

State Rail Plans n/a $0 $0 $1 

TOTAL $126 $106 $227 

FY05 FY10 FY14

Includes HSIPR and TIGER investments. Totals may not add exactly due to rounding.

SOURCES : Population: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010. Economy: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 

2010. International Statistics: CIA World Factbook, 2012. Ridership: Amtrak, 2015. All Other 

Information: Federal Railroad Administration, 2016. Last revised October 3, 2016.

Global Rank

(comparable to)

8

(Italy)

20

(Spain, France, and 

Germany combined)

32

(Argentina) 42M

14% of U.S.

$1.9 Trillion

13% of U.S.

555,000 sq. mi.

16% of U.S.

Regional Rank
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of BHM DISCRETIONARY FUTURES FUND L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Walter
Davis, President and Director of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership.



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Walter Davis                                
|Walter Davis                                    
|Ceres Managed Futures LLC
President and Director
|                                                
|Date: April 12, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Modern Mobility
Aids, Inc, (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Preston J. Shea, President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:  June 2, 2014

| | /s/  Preston J. Shea                                         
| | -------------------------------------------------------------
| | Preston J. Shea
        President and Chief Financial Officer



|
|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6381

ANDERSON L. TERRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LYNN PHILLIPS; JOHN DOE, various employees at

Central Prison,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-881-5-F)

Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: July 23, 1996

Before HALL and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anderson L. Terry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court's dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,

1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice could be

final if "no amendment [to the complaint] could cure defects in the

plaintiff's case." Id. at 1067. In ascertaining whether a dismissal

without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must

determine "whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely

amending the complaint." Id. at 1066-67.

Because Appellant could have amended his complaint to assert

some claims, the dismissal order is not appealable. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Appellant's

motion to stay as moot and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2007283EN.01000601.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Mannheim (Germany) lodged on 12 July 2007 — Criminal proceedings against Karl Schwarz

(Case C-321/07)

(2007/C 283/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Mannheim

Party to the main proceedings

Karl Schwarz

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it — contrary to Article 7(5) of Directive 91/439/EEC (1) — possible under Community law for a citizen of the EU to hold a valid German right to drive and a second right to drive issued by another Member State, both of which were obtained before the accession to the EU of the foreign Member State and — if so — |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it — contrary to Article 7(5) of Directive 91/439/EEC (1) — possible under Community law for a citizen of the EU to hold a valid German right to drive and a second right to drive issued by another Member State, both of which were obtained before the accession to the EU of the foreign Member State and — if so —

1

| 2. | Does the withdrawal — before the entry into force of the Regulation on the right to drive (Fahrerlaubnisverordnung; ‘FeV’) of 1 January 1999 — of the later second German right to drive as a consequence of a drunkenness offence mean that the validity in Germany of the first foreign right to drive, which was issued earlier, also no longer requires to be recognised after accession of the foreign Member State, even where the period of the ban imposed in Germany has expired? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the withdrawal — before the entry into force of the Regulation on the right to drive (Fahrerlaubnisverordnung; ‘FeV’) of 1 January 1999 — of the later second German right to drive as a consequence of a drunkenness offence mean that the validity in Germany of the first foreign right to drive, which was issued earlier, also no longer requires to be recognised after accession of the foreign Member State, even where the period of the ban imposed in Germany has expired?

---

(1)  Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences (OJ 1991 L 237, p. 1).

1

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Performance on demand, reliabililty and maintainability

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Performance on demand, reliabililty and maintainability 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  159 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019655735.jpg; 019655735.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 32.2

Registrant (Commission File Number 333-110029):

Broder Bros., Co.

Six Neshaminy Interplex, 6thFloor

Trevose, Pennsylvania 19053

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Broder Bros., Co. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin J. Matthews, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broder Bros., Co.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 13, 2008



BRODER BROS., CO.By:

/s/ MARTIN J. MATTHEWSMartin J. Matthews Chief Financial Officer
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 29, 2014

No. 04-13-00906-CR

Luis FRANCO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3379

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED IN 

PART. The Appellant’s brief is due on or before October 6, 2014. No further extensions of time 

will be granted.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 4.14





ADDENDUM No. 2


to


the Management Agreement dated 16/05/2011 and any addenda thereto


(the "Management Agreement")





Between


EFPLOIAS SHIPPING CO.


of Liberia


(as Owner)





And





ALLSEAS MARINE S.A.


of Liberia


(as Manager)





In respect of the management of the Vessel BOX TRADER (the "Vessel")





Notwithstanding the relevant provisions of the Management Agreement, it is this, 18th day of September 2012, mutually agreed between the Owner and the Manager that a clause 8.05 shall be added to read as follows:





"Unless the agreement is terminated by the Owner in accordance with Clauses 12.03 (iii) and (iv) of this Agreement or by reason of default by gross negligence or misconduct of Manager, its Directors, officers and/or employees in the performance under this Agreement, upon termination of this Agreement in relation to the Vessel, the Management Fee will be continued at the above rate then in effect for 90 days from the date of termination. This is to cover operating and accounting cost of finalizing the Vessels' disbursements, demurrage, etc. In addition, the Owner shall continue to pay the following:





i)
Crew support costs for a further period of three calendar months


ii)
An equitable proportion of any management staff redundancy costs which may materialize.





Notwithstanding the above, in the event that the Management Agreement is terminated in accordance with Clause 12.05, then the provisions of the Compensation Agreement between the Manager and Box Ships Inc. dated 12/09/2012, copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A forming an integral part of this Agreement, or any renewal thereof shall be applied."





All other fees, terms, conditions and provisions of the Management Agreement remain unaltered and in full force and effect.





IN WITNESS WHEREOFthe parties have signed this Addendum this 18th day of September 2012.





FOR THE OWNER
FOR THE MANAGER/s/ Maria Stefanou
/s/  George SkrimizeasMARIA STEFANOU
GEORGE SKRIMIZEASAttorney-in-fact
Attorney-in-fact
Order entered February 6, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01002-CR

EX PARTE: JEREMY MICHAEL LIEBBE

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-90392-CC2-M

ORDER

The State’s second motion for extension of time to file brief is GRANTED, 

and we ORDER the brief filed on or before MARCH 6, 2023.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE