2554 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s web site. 

2Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner 

Deanna Tanner Okun concluded that the domestic 

group response for this review was adequate and 

the respondent group response was inadequate, but 

that circumstances warranted a full review. 

3The Commission has found the responses 

submitted by the domestic interested party Mittal 

Steel USA, Inc., to be individually adequate. 

Comments from other interested parties will not be 

accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). 

session for a confidential presentation 

by Thai Respondents. Each session will 

be followed by an in camera rebuttal 

presentation by petitioner and questions 

from the Commission relating to the 

BPI. During the in camera session the 

room will be cleared of all persons 

except those who have been granted 

access to BPI under a Commission 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and are included on the Commission’s 

APO service list in this investigation. 

See 19 CFR 201.35(b). The time for the 

parties’ presentations and rebuttals in 

the in camera session will be taken from 

their respective overall allotments for 

the hearing. All persons planning to 

attend the in camera portions of the 

hearing should be prepared to present 

proper identification. 

Authority: The General Counsel has 

certified, pursuant to Commission Rule 

201.39 (19 CFR 201.39) that, in his opinion, 

a portion of the Commission’s hearing in 

Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand, Inv. 

Nos. 731–TA–706 (Second Review), may be 

closed to the public to prevent the disclosure 

of BPI. 

Issued: January 16, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–718 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 731–TA–739 (Second Review)] 

Clad Steel Plate From Japan 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping 

duty order on clad steel plate from 

Japan. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of an expedited 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on clad steel plate from 

Japan would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. For further information 

concerning the conduct of this review 

and rules of general application, consult 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric 

Land (202–205–3349), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background. On January 5, 2007, the 

Commission determined that the 

domestic group response to its notice of 

institution (71 FR 57996, October 2, 

2006) of the subject five-year review was 

adequate and that the respondent 

interested party group response was 

inadequate. The Commission did not 

find any other circumstances that would 

warrant conducting a full review.1

Accordingly, the Commission 

determined that it would conduct an 

expedited review pursuant to section 

751(c)(3) of the Act.2

Staff report. A staff report containing 

information concerning the subject 

matter of the review will be placed in 

the nonpublic record on February 1, 

2007, and made available to persons on 

the Administrative Protective Order 

service list for this review. A public 

version will be issued thereafter, 

pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions. As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the review and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,3 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

review may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the review. 

Comments are due on or before 

February 6, 2007, and may not contain 

new factual information. Any person 

that is neither a party to the five-year 

review nor an interested party may 

submit a brief written statement (which 

shall not contain any new factual 

information) pertinent to the review by 

February 6, 2007. However, should the 

Department of Commerce extend the 

time limit for its completion of the final 

results of its review, the deadline for 

comments (which may not contain new 

factual information) on Commerce’s 

final results is three business days after 

the issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s rules do not 

authorize filing of submissions with the 

Secretary by facsimile or electronic 

means, except to the extent permitted by 

section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, 

as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 

2002). Even where electronic filing of a 

document is permitted, certain 

documents must also be filed in paper 

form, as specified in II (C) of the 

Commission’s Handbook on Electronic 

Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 

(November 8, 2002). 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the review must be 

served on all other parties to the review 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 

Issued: January 12, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–669 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–590] 

In the Matter of Certain Coupler 

Devices For Power Supply Facilities, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing Same; Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES