STATF.OF\-WiSOURIJeremiah\X:Oar)Nixon,Governor•SamParkerPauley,Di=orDEPARTMENTOFNATURALAUG82011Mr.KarlBrooksRegionalAdministratorU.S.EPA,RegionVII901NorthFifthStreetKansasCity,KS66101DearMr.Brooks:www.dnr.mo.goYiiEC•DAUG1 22011APCOTheMissouriAirConservationCommissionhasrecentlyrevisedorpromulgatedthefollowingregulation(s)fortheMissouriStateImplementationPlan(SIP).Thefollowingisenclosedforyourreview:10CSR10-6.060ConstructionPermitsRequiredThisruleamendmentincorporatesfederalpermittingrequirementsthatwillcovernewconstructionprojectsthatemit100,000tonsperyearormoreofgreenhousegasesandclarifiesruletext.10CSR10-6.300ConformityofGeneralFederalActionstoStateImplementationPlansThisruleamendmentupdatesthestategeneralconformityruletobringitintocompliancewiththerecentlyamendedfederalgeneralconformityrule.Thecommissionadoptedtheenclosedruleaction(s)onApri128,2011,afterconsideringcommentsreceivedatpublichearing.ThecommissionhasfulllegalauthoritytodeveloprulespursuanttoSection643.050oftheMissouriAirConservationLaw.Thestatefollowedallapplicableadministrativeproceduresinproposingandadoptingtheruleaction(s).EnclosedaretherequiredSIPsubmittalelementsfordeterminationofplancompletenessper40CFRPart51,AppendixV.TheMissouriDepartmentofNaturalResourcesrequeststhattheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyamendtheSIPtoreplacethecurrentrule(s)intheSIP.Mr. Karl Brooks Page Two Thank you for your attention

to this matter

. If you have any questions regarding

this submittal, please contact Wendy
Vit with the Department's

Air Pollution Control Program

at P.O

. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102

or by phone

at (573) 751-4817. Sincerely

, AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM **K~;i** Interim Director KLM

: spk Enclosures: Copy
of rule published

in CSR Copy
of commission signature page certifying Missouri
Air Conservation Commission adoption Copy
of technical support documentation

for rule (if applicable) Copies

of public hearing newspaper notices Copy
of public hearing transcript introductory statement Copy ofMO Reg order ofrulemaking

with comments/responses c: Missouri

Air Conservation Commission**):sa~**

10 CSR 10-6-DEPARTIIENT

OF NATURAL RESOURCES Mo,

to enforce

the provisions

of the Air C nservation

Law and the correspondi rul Compliance

with this rule does tically absolve

the owner

or facility

of liability

for the reported.
director upon section 643.0.

, RSMo * Original
rule filed March

5, I979, effi tive Nov. II, I979

. Amended: dApril 2, 1987, effective Aug. 27. 1987.

A ended

: led June 15, 2001, effective
Feb. 28, 2002. mended: Filed Nov. 13, 2009

, ejfectiv, July 30, 2WO. •Original authority:

643 .0S O. RSMo 1965

, atMndtd

19 1992, 199 3. 1995

. 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required PURPOSE:

This rule defines sources which are requil'f!d

to obtain permits

to construct.

It establishes requirements

to be met prior

to construction

or modification

of any of these sources.
This rule also establishes permit fees and public notice l'f!quirements

for certain sources and incorporotes

a means for unify

ing the processing

of construction

and oper

ating permit issuance. PUBLISHER'S NOTE:
The secretary

of state has determined

that the publication

of the entire text of the material which

is incorporated
/:Jy refe1Y!nce

as
a portion

of this rule would

be unduly cumbersome

or expensive

. This material

as incorporated

/:Jy reference

in this rule shall
be maintained

by the agency

at its headquarters

and shall
be made available 48

to the public for inspection
and copying

at no mol'f! than the actual cost of reproduction. This note applies only
to the rejel'f!nce material

. The entil'f! text of the rule

is printed here

. ( 1) Applicability. (A) Defmitions. Definitions

of certain tenns used
in this rule may be found

in paragraph
(b) of 40 CFR 52.21 which

is incorporated
by reference

in subsection (8)(A)

of this rule

, except that1. Any provisions

of 40 CFR 52.2I(b) that are stayed shall not apply; 2. Solely
for the purposes

of paragraph (1)(A)2.
and section

(7) of this rule, the following definitions
shall
be used

in place
of the defmitions

of the same tenns specified elsewhere

in this subsection: A. Major stationary source

is defined in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iv), promulgated

as of July

1, 2007

, including

the revision published

at 72 FR 24077 (effective
July

2, 2007), and hereby incorporated

by reference in this rule,
as published

by the Office

of the Federal Register, U.S. National Archives
and Records,

700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, w.tshington,

DC 20408. This rule does not incorporate

any subsequent amendments

or additions.

The term major,

as used

in this definition,
shall be major
for the nonattainment pollutant

; B. Major modification

is defmed

in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v), promulgated

as of July

l, 2007, and hereby incorporated

by reference

in this rule,
as published

by the Office of the Federal

Re
g ister, U.S. National Archives

and Records

, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington

, DC 20408, except that any incorporated provisions

that are stayed shall not apply

. This rule does not incorporate

any subsequent amendments

or additions.

The term major,

as used

in this definition,
shall be major
for the nonattainment pollutant; C. Net emissions increase

is defined in 40 CFR 5l.165(a)(l)(vi), promulgated

as of July

1, 2rn7, and hereby incorporated

by reference

in this rule,

as published

by the Office

of the Federal Register,
U.S

. National Archives

and Records,

700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,

DC 20408, except that the tenn paragraph

(a)(

I )(xii)(B) shall be 40 CFR 52.21(b)(21)(ii).

This rule doe

s not incorporate

any subsequent amendments

or additions;

and

· D. Significant

is defined

in 40 CFR 51.l65(a)(1)(x), promulgated

as of July

1
, 2007, and hereby incorporated

by reference in this rule,
as published

by the Office

of the Federal Register,
U.S

. National Archives
and Records,

700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS

Division 10-Air Conservation Commission Washington

, DC 20408. This rule does not incorporate

any subsequent amendments

or additions

; 3

. Solely
for the purposes

of section

(9) of this rule, the following definitions
shall be used

in addition

to definitions specified elsewhere

in this subsection: A. Construct

a major source- (]) Fabricate, erect,

or install,

at any greenfield

site

, a stationary source

or group

of

s tationary sources which

is located within

a contiguous

area and under common control and which emits
or has the potential to emit ten (10) tons per year
of any hazardous

air pollutant (HAP)

or twenty-five (25) tons per year
of any combination

of HAPs;

or (II) Fabricate, erect,

or install,

at any developed

site,

a new process

or production unit which

in and of itself emits

or has the potential

to emit ten (10) tons per year of any HAP
or twenty-five

(25) tons per year of any combination

of HAPs; B

. Greenfield site-A contiguous

area under common control that

is an undeveloped site;

C. Process

or production-Any

collection

of structures and/or equipment

, that processes

, assembles, applies

, or otherwise use

s material inputs

to produce

or store
an intermediate

or final product.

A single facility may contain more than one (l) proce

ss or production
unit; D

. Reconstruct

a major

so urceReplace components

at an existing process

or production

unit where
the replacement

of components

in and of itself emits
or has the potential

to emit ten (10) tons per year of any HAP
or twenty-five

(25) tons per year

o f any combination

of HAPs, whenever- (1) The fixed capital cost of the new components exceeds fifty percent (50%)

of the fixed capital cost that would

be required to construct

a comparable process

or production unit; and (II)

It is technically

and economically feasible

for the reconstructed
major source

to meet
the applicable maximum achievable control technology emission limitation
for new sources established under this section;

E. Research

and development activities

- Activities conducted

at

a research

or laboratory facility whose primary purpose

is to conduct research

and development

into new processes

and produciS

, where such source

is operated under
the close supervi

sion of technically trained personnel

and

is not engaged

in the manufa

c ture of products for sale or exchange

for commercial profit, except

in

a de minimis manner; (7/31/11)
ROBIN CARNAHAN Secretary

of State

## Chapter 6-Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling

and Reference Methods
and Air Pollution Control Regulations

for the Entire State

of Missouri 

# 10CSR10-6~ F. Similar source-A stationary source

or process that has comparable

e missions and

is structurally similar

in design and capacity

to

a oonstructed

or reconstructed major source such that the source could
be controlled using the same control technology

; and

G. Definitions

for certain terms, other than those defined

in subparagraphs (1)(A)3.A. through



### F. of this rule, may be found

in 40 

### CFR 63.41 promulgated

as of January

1, 2007, and hereby incorporated

by reference

in this rule

, as published

by 

### the Office



### of the Federal Register

, U

. S. National Archives

and Records

, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

, Washington,

DC 20408. This rule does not inc

o rporate
any subsequent amendments

or additions; 

### 4. Nonanainment pollutant-Each

and every pollutant

for which


### the location

of the source

is 

### in an 

### area designated

to be in

### nonatta

i nment



### of

a National Ambient

Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
under section 107(d)(l)(A)(i)

of the 

### Act. Any 

### constituent or precursor

of

a nonattainment pollutant shall be

a nonanainment pollutant, provided that the constituent

or precursor pollutant may only be regulated under this rule as part of regulation

of the corresponding NAAQS pollutant.
Both volatile organic compounds (VOC)
and nitrog

e n oxides (NOx)

s hall be nonattainme

n t pollutants

for

a source located in an area designated nonattainment

for ozone;

5. The provisions



### of subsection (8)(8)

of this rule regarding

the term administrator shall apply; and 6. Definitions

for certain terms used



### in this rule, other 

### than those defined elsewhere 

### in this subsection,

ma
y be found



### in 

### 10 CSR 10-6

. 020. (B) 

### Covered Installations/Changes.

This rule shall apply

to installations throughout Missouri with

th e potential

to emit 

### anypollutant
in an amount equal

to or greater 

### than the 

### de 

### minimis levels. This rule also shall apply to 

### changes

at installations which emit less than the 

### de minimis levels where
the con

struction

or modification
itself would

be sub

ject
to section (6), (7),



### ( 8), or

( 9) 

### of this rule

. This rule shall apply

to all incinerators

, unless permitted under rule
10 CSR
10- 6.062. (C) Construction/Operation
Prohibited. No owner

or operator shall commence

construction

or modiftcation



### of any installation subject

to 

### this rule

, begin operation after that construction

or modification,

or beginoperati o n of 

### any installation which has been shut down longer 

### than five (5) years without

first obtaining

a permit from the permitting authority under this rule. fur sources

not ROBIN CARNAHAN Sec:nttary

of State 

### (7/311'i1

) subject

to review under sections
(7),

( 8 ) , or (9) of this rule, construction



### may becommenced

if authorized

by the director.

A request

for authorization

must include:

a signed waiver



### of any state liability;

acomplete list 

### of the activities

to 

### be undertaken

; and, the applicant's

full acceptance

and knowledge

of all liability associated
with the possibility

of denial

of the permit application

. A request will not be granted unless

anapplication for permit approval under this rule has been filed. 

### The waiver

is 

### not available

to sources seeking federally enforceable permit restrictions

to avoid review under sections (7)-(9)

of this rule

. (D) Exempt Emissions Units. This rule does not apply

to 

### the con

s truction

ormodification

of installations

that are exempted

or excluded

by 

### 10 CSR 10-6.061

or 

## arepermitted under rule
10 CSR 10-6

. 062. (2) Unified Review

. When the construction

or modification and operation

o f any

i nstallation requires

a construction permit unde

r this rule, and an operating permit

or itsamendment, under



### 10 CSR **10~.065,**



### theinstallation shall receive

a unified construction

and operating permit,

or its amendment,

and

a unified review, hear

i ng and approval process, unless
the applicant request

s 

### in writing that the application

for

a con

s truction
and operat

ing permit

, or its amendment,

be reviewed separately

. Under this unified review pro

c e s s, the applicant shall submit

all 

### the applications, forms, and other information required

by 

### the permitting authority. (A) Review



### of Applications.

Thepermitting authority
shall complete



### any unified review within one hundred eighty

- four (184) 

### days

, as provided under the procedures

of this rule and 10 

### CSR 10-6

. 065 Operating Permits Required

. (B) 

### Issuance

of Permits

. 

### As soon

as the unified review process

is completed,

if the applicant complies
with

all applicable requirements
under this rule and
10 CSR 

### 10- 6

. 065, the construction permit and the oper

ating permit,

or its amendment,

shall
be issued

to 

### the applicant

and the applicant


### may commence construction

. The operating
permit shall be retained

by 

### the permittingauthority until validated pursuant

to this section

. (C) Validation

of Operating Permits.With

### in one hundred
and eighty (180) days after commencing operation

, the holder



### of an operating permit,

or its amendment,
issued by the unified review process shall submit

to the permitting authority

all information required

by the permi

tt ing authority

to demonstrate compliance

with the terms and conditions

of the issued operating permit,

or its amendment.

The permittee
shall alsoproCODE
OF STATE REGULATIONS



### v i de informati

o n

i dentify

i ng 

### any applicable requiremen

ts which became applicablesubsequent

to issuance



### of the

o perating permit. Within thirty (30) da ys

a fter the applicant's request

for validation,

the permittingauthority 

### will 

### rake action denying

or approving

validation

of the 

### issued operating permit,

o r its amendment.

If 

### the perm

i ttee demonstrates compliance

with both the construction

and op
e rating permits

, or

i ts amendment,

thepermitting authority shall validate

the operating permit,

or its amendment,



### and forward

it to the permittee

. No part 70 permit will bevalidatedunless1. 

### At the time 

### of validation,

thepermitting authority certifies
that the issued permit

· contains

all applicable requirements;

or 2

. The procedures

for permit renewal

in 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(E)3.

have occurred prior to validation

to insure
the inclu

s ion of an y 

### new applicable requirements

to which
the part 

### 70 permit

is sub

j ect

. ( 3) 

### Thmporary Installa

t ions and Pilot Plants Permits

. The permitting authority

may exempt temporary installations

and pilot plants having

a potential

to emit under one hundred 

### (100)

t ons per yea

r of each pollutant from any of the requirements

of thi

s rule

, provided
that these exemp
tio ns are requested in writing prior

to the start 

### of construction. These exemptions
shall be granted only when the attainment

or maintenance

of ambient

air quality standards

is not threatened

, when there will be 

### no significant impact

on any Class



### I area, and when the imposi

t ion 

### of requirements

of this rule wo
u ld beunreasonable. (4

) 

### Portable Equipment Permits

. Portable equipment must meet the following criteria:

. (A

) The potential

to

e mit

i s le ss 

### than one hundred (100) tons per ye
a r 

### of any airpollutant

; (B) The equipment



### was permittedpreviously under either section

( 5), (6), (7), 

### or

( 8) of thi

s rule and 

### the previ

o us permit

is still valid; (C) The equipment

i s o perated
andmaintained

in

a manner identical

to that

s pecified in the currently valid permit

; and (D

) 

### The following conditions
must be met when permitted portable equipment

is to be operated

at

a different location

: 

### l. When the owner

or operat

o r wishes

t o o perate
the portable
equ

i pment

at
a 

### newlocation not previously permitted

o r at

a location where othe

r sources {either permanent

or portable)

are operating

, the

o wner
or operator shall submit

to the permitting authority

a Portable Source Relocation Request, property boundary
plot plan 

### and the equipment

la y out 

### 49]esf)

10 CSR 10-6-0EPARTIIENT

OF NATURAL RESOURCES for the site.

A relocation request

is subject

to the f!!es and the time frames specified

in this rule, except
for the pennit filing fee. The relocation request
will be approved

if it is determined

that there will be no significant impact

on any Class

I area or an area where air quality increments

have been consumed. The permitting authority
shall make the final determination

and,

if appropriate, approve the relocation request

no later than twentyone (21) calendar
days after receipt

of the complete Portable Source Relocation Request;

2. When
the owner

or operator wishes to relocate

the portable equipment

to

a site that

is listed
on the pennit

or on the amended pennit (provided other sources

are not approved

to operate

at the same location),

the owner

or operator shall report
the move

to the permitting authority

on

a Portable Source Relocation Request

for authorization

to operate in the new locale

as soon
as possible,

but not later than seven (7) calendar days prior

to ground breaking

or initial equipment
erection. No fees are associated
with this authorization. Authorization

will be presumed

if notification

of denial

is not received

by the specified ground breaking

or equipment
erection date; and 3. The equipment
shall be operated

at each new location

no more than twenty-four (24) consecutive months without

an intervening relocation. (5) De Minimis Pennits. (A) Any construction

or modification

at an installation subject

to this rule which results in
a net emissions increase below the de minimis levels shall
be exempt from further requirements

of this rule
if the owner

or operator of the source applies
for, and the permitting authority issues,

a de minimis permit
for that installation. (B) This de minimis permit shall be issued and
in effect only
if all of the following
conditions
are met: 1. The permitting authority

is notified

in writing

of the proposed construction
prior

to the commencement

of construction; 2. Information

is submitted

to the permitting authority which

is sufficient

for the permitting authority

to verify
the annual emission
rate,

to verify that no applicable emission control rules will be violated,
and
to verify that the net emission increase

of the installation

is below
the de minimis levels; 3. Net emissions

do not increase above the de minimis levels

at an installation having a de minimis permit urxter this section.

If net emissions

at the installation

do increase above the de minimis levels,
the installation
shall be in violation

of this rule until

it obtains

a per50

mit under
the other applicable requirements of this rule; and 4. All permit fees are paid. (C) In order

to eliminate

the nece

. ssity for a large number

of de minimis permit applications from

a single installation,

a special case de minimis permit may
be developed

for those batch-type production processes which frequently change products

and component source operations. Operating

in violation

of the conditions

of

a special case
de minimis permit shall
be

a violation

of this rule. (D) Air Quality Analysis Requirements. l. An air quality analysis
will not be required

for applications having

a maximum design capacity emission
rate of no more than the hourly

de minimis level unless paragraph (5)(D)2. applies.
For applications having

a maximum design capacity emission

rate greater than the hourly

de minimis level,

a permit will be issued only

if an air quality analysis demonstrates

that the proposed
construction

or modification

will not appreciably affect
air quality

or the air quality standards are not appreciably exceeded. 2. Exceptions.

The director may require an air quality analysis

for applications

if it is likely that emissions

of the proposed
construction

or modification

will appreciably affect air quality

or the air quality standards are being appreciably exceeded

or complaints filed
in the vicinity

of the proposed construction or modification warrant

an air quality analysis. (6) General Permit Requirements

for Construction

or Emissions Increase Greater Than De Minimis Levels. (A)
A pennit shall be issued pursuant

to this section only

if it is determined

that the proposed source operation

or installation

will not1. Violate
any of the applicable provisions
of this rule; 2. Interfere with the attainment

or maintenance

of ambient

air quality standards; 3. Cause

or contribute

to ambient

air concentrations

in excess

of any applicable maximum allowable increase listed

in subsection (ll)(A) Thble

l, of this rule, over the baseline concentration

in any attainment

or unclassified
area; 4. Violate
any applicable requirements of the Air Conservation

Law; and 5. Cause

an adverse impact

on visibility in any Class

I area (those designated

in paragraph (12)(1)3.

of this rule)

. (B) In order for the permitting authority

to make this determination,

each applicant shall

1. Complete

and submit appiication forms supplied

by the permitting authority. CODE
OF STATE REGULATIONS

Division 10-Air Conservation Commission These forms shall consist

of an Application for Authority

to Construct

and an Emissions Information

for Construction Permit Application. Both forms shall be completed

so that all information necessary

for process•ng

the permit

is supplied; 2

. Send

to the permitting authority

as part
of the application:

site information; plans; descriptions; specifications;

and drawings showing

the design

of the

· installation, the nature and amount

of emissions

of each pollutant

, and the manner

in which

it will be operated
and controlled; 3. Supply ambient

air quality modeling data for the pollutant

to determine

the air quality impact

of the installation

on the applications with the potential

to emit fifty (50) tons per year or more
of particulate matter

or sulfur dioxide.
The modeling techniques

to be used are as specified

in the most recent version

of the Environmental Protection Agency

's (EPA) Guideline

on Air Quality Models (EPA 450/2-78-027R), including supplements

at the time
of application,

or another model which
the permitting authority deems accurate. Temporary installations

and portable equipment
shall
be CJiempt from this requirement provided
that the source shall apply best available control technology (BACT)
for each pollutant emitted

in
a significant amount; 4. Furnish
any additional information, plans

, specifications, evidence

, documentation, modeling,

or monitoring

data that the permitting authority
may require

to complete review under this rule; and 5

. Submit fees for the filing and processing

of their perm

it application

. The amount

of the fee will be

. determined
from section (10) of this rule. (C) The review

of each permit application will follow

the procedures

of subsection (12)(A), Appendix

A of this rule and, when applicable, subsection (12)(B), Appendix

B of this rule. (D) Special Considerations

for Stack Heights
and Dispersion Thchniques

. 1 . The degree

of emission limitation required

for control

of any air pollutant under this rule shall not be affected

in any manner byA. That amount

of the stack height

of any installation which exceeds good engineering practice (GEP) stack height;

or B

. Any other dispersion technique. 2. Paragraph (6)(0)1.

of this rule shall not apply

to stack heights

on which construction commenced

on or before December

31

, 1970,
or to dispersion techniques implemented on or before December

31, 1970. 3

. Before
the permitting authority issues a permit under this rule based

on stack (7/31/11)
ROBIN CARNAHAN Secretary

of State

## Chapter 6-Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling

and Reference Methods
and Air Pollution Control Regulations

for the Entire State

of Missouri



# 10CSR10-6 **~** heights
that exceed GEP,
the permitting authority must notify 

### the public

of 

### theavailability

of the demonstration



### study and must provide opportunity

for

a public hearing

on it.
4. This paragraph
does not require that actual stack height

or the use 

### of 

### anydispersion technique

be restricted

in 

### any manner. (E) After

a permit
has beengranted1. The owner

or operator subject

to the provisions



### of this rule shall furnish
thepermitting authority written notification

asfol

### lows:

A.
A notification

of the anticipated date 

### of initial start-up



### of the source operation or installation

not more 

### than sixty (60) days or less 

### than thirty (30) days prior

to that date; and

B. A notification

of the actual date of initial start-up



### of

a source operation

or

## insui.llation within fifteen (15) days after that date; 2. A permit may be revoked

ifconstruction or modification
work

is not begunwithin two (2) 

### years from the date 

### of issuance

or if work

is suspended

for one (1) year, 

### andifA. The delay was reasonablyforeseeable 

### by the owner

or operator

at the time the permit 

### was issued; 

### B. The delay was not due to an act 

### of God or other conditions beyond
the control

of the owner

or operator;

or C. Failure

to revoke
the permit would be unfair

to other potential applicants; 3. Any owner

or operator
whoconstructs, modifies,

or operates

an installation not in accordance
with the application

submined 

### and the permit issued, including

any terms and conditions made

a 

### part of thepermit, or 

### any owner

or operator

of aninstallation who commences construction

ormodification after 

# MaY 13, 1982, without meeting the requirements

of this rule,

is in violation

of this rule; 4. Approval

to construct
shall not relieve any owner

or operator



### of the responsibility

to comply fully with applicable provisions

of 

### the Air Conservation

Law and rules
or any other requirements
under local, state,

or federal law; 

### and 

### 5. The permitting authority


### may require monitoring

of visibility

in any Class

I area (those designated

in paragraph (12)(1)3.

of this rule) near 

### the new installation

or major modification

for these purposes



### and by such means

as the permitting authority deemsnecessary and appropriate

. 

### (7) Nonattainment

Area Permits

. This section applies

to the construction



### of any 

### new major stationary source

or 

### any project

at an existing major stationary source

in an area designated as nonattainment. ROBIN CARNAHAN secretary

of State
('7/3

1/111

(A) Applicability Procedures.

Theprovisions


### of this subsection

are used

todetermine, prior

to beginning 

### actual construction, if

a project

at an existing major stationary source

is
a major modification



### and thussubject
to the permit application



### and review requirements



### of subsection (7)(B)



### of this rule

. 1. Except

for sources with

a Plantwide Applicability
Limit (PAL), which shallcomply with subsection (7)(C)

of this rule, 

### and
in accordance
with the defmition



### of the term major modification contained

in subsection (l)(A)



### of this rule

, a project

is
a majormodification

if it causes 

### two (2) types


### ofemissions increases

for the nonattainment
pollutant-a significant emissions increase


### and

a significant

net emissions increase.
Theproject

is not

a major modification

if 

### it does not cause

a signifiUUlt emissions increase

. If the project causes

a significant emissions increase, then the project

is
a majormodification only

if it also results

in

a significant net emissions increase. 2. The emissions increase from theproject

is determined



### by taking
the sum 

### of the emissions increases from each emissions

unit affected



### by the project.

An emissions

unit

is considered

to be affected



### by the project

if an emissions increase from the unit would occur as

a result



### of the project, regardless

of whether

a physical change

or change

in 

### the method

of operation
will occur

at 

### theparticular emissions
unit. 3. For each existing emissions

unit affected

by the project,

the emissions increase

is determined



### by taking thedifference between

the projected actual emissions for the completed project


### and the baseline actual emissions.

In accordance
with thedefinition



### of the term projected actual emissions found

in 40 CFR 52.21

as referred

to insubsection (1)(A)

of this rule

, the owner

oroperator of the major stationary source may elect to use the existing emission unit's potential

to emit
in lieu 

### of the projected actual emissions for this calculation. 4. For each 

### new emissions

unit affected 

### by the project,

the emissions increase

is 

### equal to the potential

to emit. 

### 5. The procedure

for calculating

the net emissions increase
(the significance

of which is the second criterion

for determining

if

a project

is
a major modification)

is contained in the definition



### of the term net emissions increase found

in subsection (l)(A)

of this rule.
6. The provisions



### of subsection (7)(B)

of this rule do 

### not apply

to

a source

ormodification that would



### be

a major stationary source

or major modification

only
if fugitive emissions

to the extent quantifmble

areconsidered

in calculating

the potential

to emit
of CODE
OF STATE REGULATIONS

the

s tationary source

or modification

and 

### the source does mt belong

to one (l) 

### of the source categories
listed

in items (i)(1

) (vii)(a)-(aa)



### of 40 CFR 52.21 which

is incorporated

by reference

in subsection (8)(A)

of this rule. (B) Permit Requirements.

A permit shall not 

### be issued,

for the construction

of

a new major stationary source
fur the nonattainment pollutants,

or fur

a major modification

fu
r the nonattainment pollutant

of an existing major stationary source, unless
the following requirements

, in addition

to section


### (6) of this rule, are me t: 1. By the time the source

is tocommence operation, sufficient emissions offsets shall


### be obtained

as required

to ensurereasonable further progress toward attainment

of the applicable national ambient

air quality standard
and consistent
with the requirements of Section 173(a)(1)(A)

of the Clean 

### Air Act 

### and paragraphs

40 CFR 51.165(a

) (3) 

### and (9); 2

. In the case
of

a new
or modified installation which

is located

in

a zone(within the nonattainment

area) identified



### by the administrator,

in consultation

with theSecretary of Housing
and Urban Development,

as a zone

to which economic development should

be targeted

, emissions

of thatpollutant resulting from the proposed
new ormodified installation

will not cause

or contribute to emissions levels which exceed

the allowance permitted

for that pollutant

for that zone from 

### new or modified installations

; 3. Offsets have been obtained

inaccordance with paragraph (7)(B)

1. and with 

### the offset and banking procedures

in 10 CSR 10- 6.410;

4

. The administrator

has not determined that 

### the state implementation

plan

is not being adequately implemented

fur thenonattainment area
in which the proposed source

is 

### to be constructed

or modified; 

### 5. Temporary installation

and portable sources shall 

### be exempt from this sectionprovided that the source applies BACT
for each pollutant emitted

in

a significant amount; 6. 

### The applicant must providedocumentation establishing



### that all installations

in Missouri, which
are owned

or operated

by the applicant,

(or 

### by any entity con

t rolling, controlled



### by, or under common control with the applicant)

are subject

to emissionlimitations 

### and are
in compliance

, or are on

a schedule

fur compliance,

with
all applicable requirements;

7

. Permit applications

shall include

a control technology evaluation

to demonstrate that 

### any new major stationary source

or major modification

will meet the lowest achievable emission
rate (LAER)

for all 

### new 51**~**

10 CSR 10-6--DEPARTMENT

OF NATURAL RESOURCES or modified emission units

, unless otherwise provided

in this section; 8

. Arty new major

s tationary source

or major modiftcauon

to be constructed

in an area designated nonattairunent

· shall comply with LAER

as determined

by the director
and set forth

in the construction permit pursuant to this section, except where otherwise

provided

in this section; 9. The applicant must provide

an alternate site analysis

; and 10

. The applicant

s hall provide

an anal

ysi

s of impairment

to visibility

in any Class

I area (those designated

in subsection (12)(1)

of this rule) that would occur

as

a result
of the installation

or major modification

and as

a result
of the general, commercial, residential, industrial,

and other growth associated
with the installation

or major modification. (C) Plantwide Applicability
Limits (PALs). The provision

s of subsection

(aa) of 40 CFR 52.21, which

is incorporated

by ref

erence

in subsection

(8

) (A) of this rule, shall govern PALs
of the nooattairunent pollutant for projects

at existing major stationary sources

in an area designated nonattainment, except that1. Th

e term Administrator

shall
be the director

of the Missouri Department

of Natu

ral Resources

' Air Pollution Control Prog ra m

; 2

. The term BACT

o r LAER and the term BACT shall both

be LAER

for the nonattairunent pollutant; 3. The term PSD program,

as
it appears in 40 CFR
52

. 21(aa)(1)(ii)(b)

, and the term m a jor NSR program

, as

it appears

in 52

. 21(aa

)( 1)(ii

) (c)

, both shall
be Nonattain

ment Area Permit program

of this secti

o n; and

4

. The director shall not allow

a PAL for VOC
or NOx for any existing major station

ary

s ource located

in an extreme ozone
nonattainment area. (D) Reporting

and Record Keeping.
This subsection applies

to project

s at ex1stmg major

s tationary sources

, without

a PAL

, which
are exempt from the permit requirements

of subsection

(7

) (B) of this rule as

a result
of the applicability determination

made in

s ubsection (7)(A)

of this rule. The owner or operator

of such sources shall

c o mply,

in regards

to the nonattairunent pollutant,
with the provisions

of paragraph (r)(6)
of 40 CFR 52

. 21, which

is incorporated

by reference

in subsection (8)(A)

of this rule

, except that the term Administrator

shall
be the director

of the Mis

s ouri Department

of Natural Resources

' Air Pollution Control Program. (E) Any constructi

o n or modification

that will impact

a federal Class

I area shall
be 52

subject

to the provisions

of subsection ( 12)(H)

of this rule

. (F) All permit applications subject

to subsection (7)(B)

of this rule are subject

to the public participation requirements

in subsection (12)(B)

of this rule

. (G) The director

of the Missouri Department

of Natural Resources

' Air Pollution Control Program shall transmit

to the administrator

o f the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

a copy
of each permit application filed under section

(7) of thi

s rule and shall notify
the administrator

of each significant action taken
on the application. (8) Attairunent

and Unclassified

Area Permits

. (A) All of the subsections

of 40 CFR 52

. 21

, other than (a) Plan disapproval

, (q) Public participation

, (s
) Environmental impact statements

, and (u) Delegation

of authority, promulgated

as of July

1
, 2009, including

the revision published

at 75 FR 31606

- 07 (effective August

2, 2010),
are hereby incorporated

by reference

in this rule, as published

by the Office

of the Federal Register, U.S

. National Archives

and Records, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

, Washington, DC 20408

. This rule does not incorporate any subsequent amendments

or additions. (B) Administrator

a s it appears

in 40 CFR 52

. 21 shall refer

to the director

of the Mis

souri Department

of Natural Resources

' Air Pollution Control Program except

in the

f o llowing, where

it shall continue

to refer

to the admini

s trator

of the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency: 1
. (b )(17) Federally enforceable; 2

. (b)(37)(i) Repowering

; 3

. (b)(43) Prevention

of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) program; 4

. (b)(48)(ii)(c); 5. (b)(50) Regulated NSR pollutant; 6. (b)(51) Reviewing authority; 7

. (g) Redesignation

; 8. 0) Air quality models; 9. (p)(2) Federal Land Manager

; and 10. (t) Disputed permits

or redesigna

tion

s. (C) All permit applications subject

to section (8) of this rule are subject

to the public participation requirement

s in subsection (12)(B)

of this rule. (D) The director

of the Missouri Department

of Natural Resources

' Air Pollution C ontrol Program shall transmit

to the admini s trator

of the U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency

a copy
of each permit application filed under section

(8) of thi

s rule and shall notify
the administrator

of each significant action taken
on the application. CODE
OF STATE REGULATIONS

Division

1 0-Air Conservation Commission (E) Applicants

must obtain emission reductions, obtained through binding agree

ment prior

to commencing operations

and subject

to 10 CSR 10-6

. 410, equal

to and of a comparab

l e air quality impact

to the new or increased emissions

in the following circumstances when the: 1. Area has no increment available;

or 2. Proposal
will consume more increment than

is available. (9) Hazardous

Air Pollutant Permits

. The requirements

of this section apply

to any owner

or operator

of
a major source identified in subsection (9)(B)

of this rule

, unless
the major source

in question

has been specifically regulated

or exempted from regulation under

a standard issued pursuant

to section 112(d), section ll2(h)

, or sect

i ol) l12(j)

of the Clean Air Act and incorporated

in anothe r subpart

of p;m 63 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),

or the owner

or operator of such

a major source has received

all necessary
air quality permits

for construction

or reconstruction
before
the effective date of this section

. (A) Applicability.

No person
ma
y construct or reconstruct

a major source unless they submit

an application

and receive approval from the permitting authority according

to the procedures

of paragraph

s (9)(C)2

. and (9)(C)3

. of this rule; or unles

s all of the following
are satisfied: 1
. All HAPs emitted

by the process

or production

unit that would otherwi

s e be controlled under the requirements

of thi

s secti on will be controlled

by emission control equipment which was previously installed

at the same site
as the process

or production
unit; 2. The permitting authority

A

. Has determined within

a period

of five (5) years prior

to the fabrication,
erection,
or installation

of the process

or production unit that the existing emission control equipment represented

best available control technology (BACI'), lowest achievable

emi

s sion rate (LAER) under
40 CFR part
51 or 52, toxic-best available control technology (T

- BACI),

Of{ maximum achievable control technol

o gy (MACT) based
on

s tate air toxic rules for the category

of pollutants

whi

c h include

s those HAPs

to be emitted

by the process

or production
unit;
or B

. Determines

that the control

of HAP emis

s i o ns provided

by the existing equipment

will be equivalent

to that level
of control currently achieved

by oth

e r well-controlled similar sources
(i.e

. , equivalent

to the level
of control that would

be provided

by

a current BACT,
LA
E R, T-BACT,

or state air toxic rule MACT determination); (7/31111)

ROBIN CARNAHAN Secret.ry

of State

## Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling

and Reference Methods
and Air Pollution Control Regulations

for the Entire State

of Missouri 

# 10CSR1~~ 3. The permitting authority determines that the percent control efficiency

foremissions

of HAP from

all sources

to 

### becontrolled

by the existing control equipment

will be equivalent

to the percent controlefficiency provided

by the control equipment prior

to the

· inclusion

of the new process

orproduction unit; 

### 4. The permitting authority



### has provided notice and an opportunity

for public comment concerning

its determination

that criteria

in paragraphs (9)(A)l.

, 2

. , and


### 3. of this rule apply and concerning



### the continued adequacy 

### of any prior LAER, 

### BACT, T-BACT

, or state air toxic rule MACT determination; 5. If any commenter

has asserted
that

a prior LAER, 

### BACT, T-BACT,

or state air toxic rule MACT determination

is no longer adequate,

the permitting authority

has deter

mined that the level


### of control required

by that prior determination remains adequate; 6. The requirements

of section

(6) 

### of this rule are met; and 

### 7. Any em

i ssion limitations,
workpractice requirements,

or other terms andconditions upon which the above determinations



### by the permitting authority

are predicated

will 

### be construed

by the permitting authority

as applicable requirements
under section 504(a) of 

### the Clean Air Act 

### and either have been incorporated in

to any existing 

### Part 70 permit for the affected facility

or will be incorporat

ed into such permit upon issuance. (B) Exemptions.

The requirements

ofsection (9) 

### of this rule do not applyto1. Electric utility steam generating
units unless they are listed
on the source category list established

in accordance

with section 112(c)

of the Clean Air Act; or 2. Research



### and development activities. (C) MACT Review
and Determinations

. 1. General principles

. A. The MACT emission limitation

or MACT requirements recommended

by the applicant

and approved

by the permitting authority shall not be less stringent



### than the emission control which

is achieved

inpractice by the best controlled similar source,

as determined

by the permitting authority

. B. Based upon available information, the MACT emission limitation

and control technology recommended

by the applicant and approved



### by the permitting authority shall achieve

the maximum degree



### ofreduction

in emissions

of HAPs which can 

### be achieved



### by utilizing those controltechnologies that can 

### be identified from the available information,
taking into consideration



### the costs
of achieving
such emission reduction and any non-air quality health andenvironmental impacts
and energy requirements associated
with 

### the emission reduction. ROBIN CARNAHAN Secretary

of State (7131111)

C. The applicant


### may recommend

a specific design, equipment,
work practice,

or operational standard,

or

a combination
there

### of, and the permitting authority
may approve such

a 

### standard

if the permitting authority specifically determines

that

it is not feasible to prescribe

or enforce



### an emission limitation

· under
the criteria

set forth

in section 112(h)(2)

of 

### the Clean Air Act. D. The applicant



### has met therequirements

of section

(6) of this rule

. 2. Application requirements

for

acase

### by-case MACT determination. A

. An application

for

a MACTdetermination shall specify

a control technology selected

by the owner

or operator that,

if properly operated
and maintained,

will meet 

### the MACT emission limitation

or standard

as determined according

to the principles

set forth
in paragraph (9)(C)l.



### of this rule. 

### B. Where additional controltechnology or

a change

in control technology

is required,

the application

for

a MACfdetermination shall contain
the followinginformation:

([) Emissions Information

forConstruction Permit Application; (II) Standard application
form and information

as described

in paragraph (12)(A)4

. 

### of this rule; (Ill) The anticipated

date ofstartup;
(IV) The estimated emission
rate for each such HAP,

to the extent thisinformation

is needed



### by the permitting authority to determine MACT; (V) Any applicablefederallyenforceable emission limitations; (VI) The maximum

and expected utilization



### of capacity

and 

### the associated uncontrolled emission rates for that source,

to the extent this information

is needed



### by the permitting authority

to determine MACT; (Vll) The controlled emissions

in tons/year

at expected
and maximumutilization of capacity,

to the extent this information is needed



### by the permitting authority

todetermine MACI'; (Vlli)

A recommended emission limitation consistent
with 

### the principles

set forth

in paragraph (9)(C)l.

of this rule; (IX) The selected controltechnology to meet the recommended MACTemission limitation, including technicalinformation on the design, operation,

size, 

### and estimated control efficiency

of the control technology

(and the manufacturer's

name, address, telephone number,

and relevant specifications

and drawings,

if requested



### by the permitting authority)

; (X) Supporting documentation including identification

of alternative control CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS technologies considered



### by the applicant

to meet the emission limitation

, and analysis

of cost and non-air quality health environmental impacts

or energy requirements

for the selected control technology;

and (XI) 

### Any other relevant information required

to be submitted



### by the permitting authority deemed necessary

to determine MACT.

C. Where
the owner

or operatorcontends that source will 

### be in compliance,
upon start-up, with case-by-case MACT without

a change

in control technology,



### the application for

a MACT determination

shall contain



### the following information: ([) The information described

in parts (9)(C)2.B.(II) through (9)(C)2.B.(XI) of this rule
to determine MACT; and (I[) Documentation

of the control technology

in place

. 

### 3

. Administrative procedures

for 

### review of the 

### MACT application

. A

. The permitting authority
willnotify the owner

or operator

in writjng

, within thirty (30) days from the date the application is first received,

as to whe

t her the application for

a MACT

de

t ermination

is complete

or whether additional information

is required. B. The permitting authority

willinitially approve

the recommended MACTemission limitation



### and other terms
set forth
in the application

, or 

### the permitting authority

will notify
the owner

or operator

in writing

of its intent

to disapprove

the application, within thirty (30) calendar days after the owner

or operator

is notified

in writing that theapplication

is complete. C. Notice

of disapproval. (I) The owner

or operator


### maypresent,

in writing, within sixty (60) calendar 

### days after receipt

of notice



### of the permitting authority's intent

to disapprove

the app

lication

, additional information

or arguments pertaining

to

, or amendments

to, theapplication for consideration

by the permitting authority before

it decides whether

to finally disapprove

the applica

t ion

. (II) The permitting authority

will either initially approve

or issue

a finaldisapproval



### of the application within ninety (90) days after

it notifies



### the owner

or operator

of 

### an intent

to disapprove

or within thirty (30) days after 

### the date additional information

is received from the owner

or operator, whichever

is earlier. (Ill)

A 

### fmal determination

by the permitting authority

to disapprove

anyapplication will be in writing and will specify
the grounds

on which


### the disapproval

is based.

If any application

is fmally disapproved,

the owner

or operator
may submit

a subsequent application, provided
that the subsequent

53**~**

10 CSR **1~EPARTMENTOF**
NATURAL RESOURCES application

has been amended

in response

to the stated grounds

for the prior disapproval. D. Incorporation

of the MACf determination
into

a construction permit. (I} When

an application

for

a MACf determination

is approved pursuant

to this section,

the construction permit issued pursuant

to this rule shall contain

a MACT emission limitation

(or

a MACT work practice standard

if the permitting authority determines

it is not feasible

to prescribe

or enforce an emission standard)

to control

the emissions
of HAP. (II) Such construction permit will specify
any notification, operation

and maintenance, performance testing, monitoring, reporting,

and record-keeping requirements. Such construction permit shall include: (a) In addition

to the MACf emission limitation additional emission
limits, production limits, operational limits

, or other terms and conditions necessary

to ensure enforceability

of the MAcr emission limitation;

(b) Compliance certifications, testing, monitoring, reporting,

and recordkeeping requirements

that are consistent
with the requirements

of 10 CSR 10-6.065; (c) In accordance

with section 114(a)(3)

of the Clean Air A£t, monitoring shall be capable

of demonstrating continuous compliance during
the applicable reponing period. Such monitoring

data shall be of sufficient quality

to be used

as

a basis for enforcing

all applicable requirements including emission limitations;

and (d)
A statement requiring

the owner

or operator

to comply with
all appli

cable requirements. (Ill} ApProval
shall expire

if con

struction

or reconstruction

has not com

menced within eighteen
(18) months

of issuance, unless
the permitting authority

has granted

an extension. However,

in no case will approval extend beyond thirty (30) months from the date of issuance

if construc

tion or reconstruction

have not commenced. E. Opportunity

for public comment on the construction permit shall follow
the procedure found

in subsection (12)(B), Appendix

B, Public Participation,

of this rule.

F. EPA notification.

The permitting authority shall send

a copy
of the final construction permit

or other notice

of approval issued

to the administrator through

the appropriate regional office

, and to all other state and local air pollution control agencies having jurisdiction

in affected states; G. Compliance

date

. On and after the date of start-up,

a constructed

or reconstruct

ed major source which

is subject

to these requirements

shall be in compliance

with
all applicable requirements specified

in the MACf determination. (D) Requirements

for constructed

or reconstructed
major sources subject

to

a subsequently promulgated standard

or MACf requirement.

l. If an emission standard

is promulgated under section 112(d)

or section 112(h)

of the Clean Air Act or the state issues

a determination under section 112(j)

of the Clean Air Act that

is applicable

to

a stationary source

or group

of sources which would

be deemed

to be

a constructed

or reconstructed major source under this section before
the date that the owner

or operator

has obtained a final and legally effective MACf determiruu:ion under any of the review options available
in this rule, the owner

or operator

of the source(s) shall comply with the promulgated standard

or determination
rather than any MACI' determination
under this section

by the state, and the owner

or operator shall comply with the promulgated standard

by the compliance

date
in the promulgated standard. 2. If an emission standard

is promulgated under section 112(d)

or section 112(h)

of the Clean Air Act or the state issues

a determination under section 112(j)

of the Clean Air Act that

is applicable

to

a stationary source

or group

of sources which would

be deemed

to be

a constructed

or reconstructed major source under this section and has been subject

to

a prior case

- by-case MACT determination pursuant

to this section,
and the owner

or operator obtained

a final and legally effective case-by-case MACI' determination prior

to the promulgated

date of such emission standard,
then the state shall (if the initial part 70 permit
has not yet been issued) issue an initial operating permit which incorporates

the emission standard

or determination,
or shall (if the initial part 70 permit has been issued) revise
the operating permit according

to the reopening procedures

in 40 CPR part 70 or part 71, whichever

is relevant,

to incorporate

the emission standard

or determination.

A. The EPA may include

in the emission standard established under section 112(d)

or section 112(h)

of the Clean Air Act a specific compliance

date for those sources which have obtained

a final and legally effective MACf determination
under this section and which have submitted

the information required

by this section

to the EPA before
the close

of the public comment period
for the standard established under section 112(d)

of the Clean Air A£t. Such date shall assure that the owner

or operator shall comply with the promulgated standard

as expeditiously

as practicable,

but no longer than eight
(8) years CODE
OF STATE REGULATIONS

Division 10-Air ConseiVation Commission after such standard

is promulgated.

In that event, the state shall incorporate

the applicable compliance

date

in the part 70 operating permit.

B. If no compliance

date has been established

in the promulgated section 112(d) or 112(h) standard

or section 112(j) determination,
for those sources which have obtained a final and legally effective MACT determination under this section, then the permitting authority shall establish

a compliance

date in the

· permit that assures that the owner

or operator shall comply with the promulgated standard

or determination

as expeditiously

as practicable,

but not longer than eight
(8) years after such standard

is promulgated

or

a section ll2G) determination

is made. 3. Notwithstanding

the requirements

of paragraphs (9)(D)l

. and
2. of this rule,

if an emission standard

is promulgated
under section 112( d) or section 112(h)

of the Clean Air Act or the state issues

a determination
under section 112(j)

of the Clean Air Act that

is applicable

to

a stationary source

or group

of sources which was deemed

to be

a constructed or reconstructed
major source under this section
and which

is the subject

of

a prior case-by-case MACT determination pursuant to this section

, and the level

of control required

by the emission standard issued uooer section 112(d)

or section ll2(h)

or the determination
issued under section 112(j)

is less stringent
than the level
of contr

o l required

by any emission limitation

or standard
in the prior MAcr determination,

the state

is not required

to incorporate

any less stringent terms

of the promulgated standard in the part 70 operating permit applicable

to such source(s)

and may

in its discretion
consider any more stringent provisions

of the prior MACT determination

to be applicable legal requirements
when

i s suing
or revising such operating permit.

· (10) Permit Amendments

and Fees. (A) Permit Fees. l. All installations

or source operations requiring permits under this rule shall make application

to the permitting authority

and submit
the application
with

a permit filing fee of one hundred dollars ($100)

. Failure

to submit the permit filing fee constitutes

an incomplete permit application according

to paragraph (l2)(A)2.

of this rule. 2. Upon
the determination

that

a complete application

for

a permit

or

a permit amendment

has been received

, a fee for permit processing

in the amount

of fifty dollars ($50) per hour
of actual staff time will begin to accrue

. In lieu of the fifty-dollar ($50) perhour review
fee, for projects subject

to review under paragraph (4)(D)l.

of this rule, (7/31/11)

ROBIN CARNAHAN Secm.ry

of State

## Chapter 6-Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling

and Reference Methods
and Air Pollution Control Regulations

for the Entire State

of Missouri


# 10CSR10-6 

# ~ a fee of two 

### hundred dollars ($200) 

### shall


### be submitted

by 

### the applicant. 3. The applicant
shall submit fees for the processing

of the 

### pennit application
within ninety (90) 

### calendar
days


### of the 

### fmal review detennination, whether

the pennit

is approved, denied, withdrawn,

or not needed

. After
the ninety (90) 

### calendar days, the unpaid processing

fees shall have interest imposed upon the unpaid amount

at the rate often percent (10%) 

### per 

### annum from the date of billing until payment

is 

### made

. Failure

to submit

the processing

fees after the ninety (90) 

### calendar
days will result

in the permit being denied (revoked

for portableinstallation location amendments)

and the rejection of any future permit applications

by 

### the same applicant until the processing

fee plus interest have 

### been paid. 

### 4. In addition

to 

### permit filing andprocessing fees, the applicant shall pay 

### for any publication

of notice required

and shall pay 

### for the original
and one (1) copy of 

### thetran

### script,

to 

### be filed with the 

### permittingauthority, of any 

### hearing required under 

### this rule. No permit shall be issued until
all publication and transcript costs have been paid. 

### 5. Partially processed pennits
that 

### are withdrawn
after submittal shall be charged

at the 

### same processing

fee rate
in paragraph (lO)(A)2

. of this rule for the 

### time 

### spentprocessing
the application. 6. The commission

may reduce
thepermit processing

fee or exempt any 

### person from payment

of the fee upon
an appeal filed with the commission stating and documenting

that the fee will create
an unreasonable economic hardship upon the person. 

### 7. Any person who obtains

a valid per

mit from

a city 

### or county holding

a certificate of authority granted

by 

### the commission under section 643.140, RSMo, shall be deemed

to 

### have met the fee requirements

of 

### this section for that permit. (B) 

### Amending

a Final Permit. l. No changes

in the proposedinstallation
or modification



### may be made which \Wuld change
any infonnation

in

a fmalized permit, except

in accordance

with thissubsection.
2. If the applicant desires

to 

### make the change,

the applicant
shall submit

in writing a request

to the permitting authority

that the permit

be amended

. 3. If 

### the requested change will result

in increased emissions,

air quality impact

or increment consumption

, and

is submitted after the 

### final notice

of permit processing

fee due,

a new pennit application

is required

for the requested change. The new application,

to the maximum extent possible, should refer

ence those portions

of the original application ROBIN CARNAHAN 

### (7/31/11

) Secntary

of Stata



### that are unchanged

. This 

### new submittal


### will be subject

to all requirements

of 

### this rule

. The accrued permit processing

fee from the 

### original application
must
be 

### submitted

to 

### the permitting authority before
the 

### new permit application

can be accepted. 

### 4. If the requested change 

### will not resul

t in increased emissions,

air quality impact,

or increment consumption,

the original perm

it application
shall
be 

### amended

and the 

### permit 

### shall
be modified pursuant

to the amended application within thirty (30) 

### calendar days of 

### receipt

of 

### the written request. The fee for this type 

### of change will be subject

to the

### requirements



### of subsection (lO)(A), exceptparagraph (lO)(A}l.,

of this rule. (11) 

### Thbles. (A) Table 1-Ambient

Air Increment Thble.

Maximum 

### Allowable 

### PoUutant



### Increase Class

I Areas Particulate Matter

10 Micron Annual arithmetic mean

4 24-hour maximum

8 

### Sulfur Dioxide: Annual 

### arithmetic mean

2 24-hour maximum

5 

### 3-hoor maximum

25 **Nitro~n** 

### Dioxide: Annual arithmetic mean

2.5 Class

II Areas Particulate Matter

10 Micron Annual arithmetic mean

17 24-hour maximum

30 Sulfur dioxide: Annual arithmetic 

### mean

20 24-hour maximum

91 3-hour maximum

512 Nitrogen Dioxide: Annual arithmetic mean

25 Class


### Ill Areas Particulate Matter

10 Micron Annual arithmetic mean

34 24-hour maximum

60 

### Sulfur dioxide

: Annual arithmetic mean

40 

### 24-hour maximum

182 3-hour maximum

700 Nitrogen Dioxide: Annual arithmetic mean

50 

### Notes: 1. AU increases

in 

### micrograms

per cubic meter. ror any 

### period other than on annual period,

the applicable maximum allowable increase
may


### be exceeded during one (1) period once per year
at 

### any 

### one (1) location. 2. There are two 

### (2) Class

I Areas

inMisCODE OF STATE REGULATIONS


### souri-one

(I)
in Taney County (Hercules Glade) and one (1) 

### in l*lyne and 

### Stoddard CoUIIIies (Mingo Refuge). 3. There are no Class
l1l Areas

in Missouri

at this tifTU'. (B) 

### 'Thble 2-Significant Monitoring
Concentrations. 

### PoUutant Carbon monoxide Nitrogen dioxide ParticulatematterAir Quality 

### Impact 575, 8-hour average 14, annual tO 

### micron (PM

10
)



### 10, 24-hour 13, 24-hour 

# * Sulfur dioxide 

### Ozone Lead Mercury Beryllium Fluorides Vinyl chloride Thtal 

### reduced sulfur Hydrogen sulfide

. 1, 3-month 0.25, 24-hour .001, 24-hour 0.25, 24-hour Reduced sulfur compounds

15, 24-hour 10, 1-hour 0 .2

, 1-hour 

### 10, 1-hour 

### Note: All impacts

in micrograms

per cubic meter. *No significant monitoring concentration

is provided
for ozone

. However,

any potential net increase

of 

### 100 tons per year,
or more,


## of vo latile organic compounds

or nitrogen oxides subject

to section

(8) of this rule would require

an ambient impact afUlly sis, including the gathering

of ambient

air qlUllity data

. (C) Thble 3-Missouri Guidelines

for Valid Data Thtal 

### Suspended Particulate

. 

### Thne Period Month Quarter Year 

### Minimum Requirement for Validity 

### 2, 24-hour samples 10, 24-hour samples
and 

### 3 valid months 45, 24-hour samples
and



### 4 valid quarters 

### Continuously Monitored
Data 11me Period 3-hour running average 8-hour running average 24-hour average . (daily) Monthly Quarterly' Yearly> 

### Minimum Requirement for Validity 

### 3 consecutive hourly observations 6 hourly observations 18 hourly observations 21 daily averages 3 consecutive monthly averages 11 month1y averages 1 

### Quarter

is defmed

as calendar quarter. >Year

is defined

as four (4) consecutive

cal

### endar quarters. (D) Thble 4-Significant
Levels

for Air 55ib10CSR10·6-DEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCESQualityImpactinClassIIAreas.Averaging'Time(Hours)PollutantAnnual2483Isoll.O525PM,0l.O5NO,l.Oco.52Note:Allimpactsinmicrogramspercubicmeter,exceptforCOinmilligramspercubicmeter.(12)Appendices.(A)AppendixA,PermitReviewProcedures.1.Preapplicationmeeting.Priortosubmittalofacompletepermitapplication,theapplicantmayrequestapreapplicationmeetingwiththepermittingauthoritytodiscussthenatureofandapparentrequirementsfortheforthcomingpermitapplication.Thismeetingshallnotfallunderthepermitfeerequirements.2.Completeapplication.A.Thepermittingauthorityshallrevieweachapplicationforcompletenessandshallinformtheapplicantwithinthirty(30)daysiftheapplicationisnotcomplete.Inordertobecomplete,anapplicationmustincludeacompletedapplicationformand,totheextentnotcalledforbytheform,theinformationrequiredinparagraph(12)(A)4.ofthisrule.B.Ifthepermittingauthoritydoesnotnotifytheinstallationthatitsapplicationisnotcompletewithinthirty(30)daysofreceiptoftheapplication,theapplicationshallbedeemedcomplete.However,nothinginthissubsectionshallpreventthepermittingauthorityfromrequestingadditionalinformationthatisreasonablynecessarytoprocesstheapplication.(I)Thepermittingauthorityshallmaintainachecklisttobeusedforthecompletenessdetermination.Acopyofthechecklistidentifyingtheapplication'sdeficienciesshallbeprovidedtotheapplicantalongwiththenoticeofincompleteness.(II)If,whileprocessinganapplicationthathasbeendeterminedordeemedtobecomplete,thepermittingauthoritydeterminesthatadditionalinformationisnecessarytoevaluateortotakefinalactiononthatapplication,thepermittingauthoritymayrequestthisadditionalinformationinwriting.Inrequestingthisinformation,thepermittingauthorityshallestablishareasonabledeadlineforaresponse.Thereviewperiodwillbeextendedbytheamountoftimenecessarytocollecttherequiredinformation.56(Ill)Insubmittinganapplicationforamendmentofaconstructionpermit,theapplicantmayincorporatebyreferencethoseportionsoftheexist1ngpermit(andthepermitapplicationandanypermitamendment)thatdescribeproducts,processes,operations,andemissions.Theapplicantmustidentifyspecificallyandlistwhichportionsofthepreviouspermit,applications,orboth,areincorporatedbyreference.Inaddition,apermitamendmentapplicationmustcontain-(a)Informationspecifiedinparagraph(12)(A)4.ofthisruleforthoseproducts,processes,operations,andemissions-[.Thatarenotaddressedinthepreviouspermitorapplication;II.Thataresubjecttoapplicablerequirementsthatarenotaddressedinthepreviouspermitorapplication;orIII.Porwhichtheapplicantseekspermittermsandconditionsthatdifferfromthoseinthepreviouspermitorapplication.C.Confidentialinformation.Anapplicantmaysubmitinformationtothepermittingauthorityunderaclaimofconfidentialitypursuantto10CSR10-6.210.D.Filingfee.Eachapplicationmustbeaccompaniedbyaonehundred-dollar($100)filingfee.3.Dutytosupplementorcorrectapplication.Anyapplicantwhofailstosubmitanyrelevantfactsorwhohassubmittedincorrectinformationinapermitapplication,uponbecomingawareofthefailureorincorrectsubmittal,shallpromptlysubmitsupplementaryfactsorcorrectedinformation.Inaddition,anapplicantshallprovideadditionalinformation,asnecessary,toaddressanyrequirementsthatbecomeapplicabletotheinstallationafterthedateanapplicationisdeemedcomplete,butpriortotheissuanceoftheconstructionpermit.4.Standardapplicationformandrequiredinformation.Thedirectorwillprovideastandardapplicationpackageforapplicant'suse.AnapplicantshallsubmitanapplicationpackageconsistingofthestandardapplicationformandEmissionsInformationforConstructionPermitApplication.Aftertheeffectivedateofthisrule,anyrevisiontothedepartment-suppliedformswillbepresentedtotheregulatedcommunityforaforty-five(45)-day·commentperiod.Theapplicationpackagemustincludeallinformationneededtodetermineapplicablerequirements.Theapplicationmustincludeinformationneededtodeterminetheapplicabilityofanyapplicablerequirement.,Theapplicantshallsubmittheinformationcalledforbytheapplicationformforeachemissionsunitattheinstallationtobepermitted.ThestandardCODEOFSTATEREGULATIONSDivision10--AirConservationCommissionapplicationform(andanyattachments)shallrequirethatthefollowinginformationbeprovided:A.Identifyinginformation.Theapplicant'scompanynameandaddress(orplantnameandaddressifdifferentfromthecompanyname),theowner'snameandstateregisteredagent,andthetelephonenumberandnameoftheplantsitemanagerorothercontactperson;B.Processesandproducts.Adescriptionoftheinstallation'sprocessesandproducts(bytwo(2)-digitStandardIndustrialClassificationCode);C.Emissions-relatedinformation.Thefollowingemissions-relatedinformationontheemissioninventoryforms:(I)Allemissionsofregulatedairpollutants.Thepermitapplicationshalldescribeallemissionsofregulatedairpollutantsemittedfromeachemissionsunit,exceptasprovidedforbythissection.Theinstallationshallsubmitadditionalinformationrelatedtotheemissionsofairpollutantssufficienttoverifywhichrequirementsareapplicable;(II)Identificationanddescriptionofallemissionsunitswhoseemissionsareincludedinpart(12)(A)4.C.(I)ofthisrule,insufficientdetailtoestablishtheapplicabilityofallrequirements;(III)Emissionsrates,orinformationthatenablesthepermittingauthoritytodeterminesuchrates,intonsperyearandinsuchtermsasarenecessarytoestablishcomplianceconsistentwiththeapplicablestandardreferencetestmethod,ifany;(IV)Informationtotheextentneededtodetermineorregulateemissions:fuels,fueluse,rawmaterials,productionrates,andoperatingschedules;(V)Identificationanddescriptionofairpollutioncontrolequipment;(VI)Identificationanddescriptionofcompliancemonitoringdevicesoractivities;(VII)Limitationsoninstallationoperationsaffectingemissionsoranyworkpracticestandards,whereapplicable,forallregulatedairpollutants;(VIII)Otherinformationrequiredbyanyapplicablerequirement(includinginformationrelatedtostackheightlimitationsdevelopedpursuanttosection123oftheAct);and(IX)Calculationsonwhichtheinformationinitems(12)(A)4.C.(I)-(VIII)ofthisruleisbased;D.Otherspecificinformationrequiredunderthepermittingauthority'sruletoimplementandenforceotherapplicablerequirementsoftheActoroftheserules,or(7131/11)ROBINCARNAHANSecretaryofStateChapter6--AirQualityStandards,Definitions,SamplingandReferenceMethodsandAirPollutionControlRegulationsfortheEntireStateofMissouri10CSRtodeterminetheapplicabilityoftheserequirements.5.Certificationbyresponsibleofficial.Anyapplicationformorreportsubmittedpursuanttothisruleshallcontaincertificationbyaresponsibleofficialoftruth,accuracy,andcompleteness.Thiscertification,andanyothercertification,shallbesignedbyaresponsibleofficialandshallcontainthefollowinglanguage:..1certify,basedoninformationandbeliefformedafterreasonableinquiry,thestatementsandinformationinthedocumentaretrue,accurate,andcomplete."6.Receiptofthecompleteapplication.Uponreceiptofacompletepermitapplication,thepermittingauthorityshallproceedwithprocessingoftheapplication.7.Notificationofprocessingfees.Thepermittingauthority,astimelyaspossible,willnotifytheapplicantinwritingifthepermitprocessingfeeapproachesonethousanddollars($1,000)andinonethousand-dollar($1,000)incrementsafterthat.8.Publicparticipation.Forallapplicationsforsourcesthatemitfive(5)ormoretonsofleadperyear,orthatcontaingoodengineeringpracticestackheightdemonstrations,orthataresubjecttosection(7)or(8)ofthisrule,thepermittingauthorityshallfollowtheproceduresforpublicparticipationasspecifiedinsection(12),Appendix(B)ofthisrule.9.Finalcompletenessdetermination.Finaldetermmationwillbemadeonthefollowingschedules:A.Thepermittingauthoritywillmakefinaldeterminationsforcompletepermitapplicationsprocessedundersection(7),(8),or(9)ofthisrulenolaterthanonehundredeighty-four(184)calendardaysafterreceiptofacompleteapplication,takingintoaccountanyadditionaltimenecessaryformissinginformation;B.Thepermittingauthoritywillmakefinaldeterminationforcompletepermitapplicationsprocessedundersection(3),(4),(5),or(6)ofthisrulenolaterthanninety(90)calendardaysafterreceiptofacompleteapplication,takingintoaccountanyadditionaltimenecessarymissinginformation;andC.Ifthepermittingauthorityexceedsthetimeforreviewdescribedinsubparagraph(12)(A)9.A.orB.ofthisrule,theapplicantshallnotberequiredtopaytheprocessingfeeassociatedwiththeapplication.10.Conditionsrequiredbypermittingauthority.Thepermittingauthoritymayimposethoseconditionsinapermitasmaybenecessarytoaccomplishthepurposesofthisrule,anyapplicablerequirements,orthe.AirConservationLaw,Chapter643,RSMo,ROBINCARNAHANSecretaryofState(7/31/11)andarenolessstringentthananyapplicablerequirements.Nothinginthisruleshallbedeemedtolimitthepowerofthepermittingauthorityinthisregard.Thefollowingconditionexamplesaresolelyforthepurposesofillustration,anddonotlimitthegeneralityoftheprecedingliberalsentence:A.Samplingportsofasuitablesize,number,andlocation;B.Safeaccesstoeachport;C.Instrumentationtomonitorandrecordemissiondata;D.Othersamplingandtestingfacilities;E.Operatingorworkpracticeconstraintstolimitthemaximumlevelofemissions;F.Emissioncontroldeviceefficiencyspecificationstolimitthemaximumlevelofemissions;G.Maximumlevelofemissions;H.Emissiontestingaftercommencingoperations,tobeconductedbytheowneroroperator,asnecessarytodemonstratecompliancewithapplicablerequirementsorotherpermitconditions;I.Datareporting;andJ.Post-constructionambientmonitoringandreporting.11.Draftsforpubliccomment.Followingreviewofanapplication,thepermittingauthority shallissueadraftpermitforpubliccomment,inaccordancewithsubsection(12)(B)ofthisrule.Thedraftshallbeaccompaniedbyastatementsettingforththelegalandfactualbasisforthedraftpermitconditions(includingreferencestoapplicablestatutoryorregulatoryprovisions).Thepermittingauthorityshallsendthisstatementtotheadministrator,toaffectedstates,andtotheapplicant,andshallplaceacopyinthepublicfile.12.Additionalproceduresneededforunifiedreviewsofthisrule'ssection(6),(7),(8),or(9)unifiedreviewconstructionpermitapplicationsandpart70operatingpermitapplications.A.Permitreviewbytheadministratorandaffectedstates.(I)Administratorreview.(a)Copiesofapplications,proposals,andfinalactions.Theapplicantwillprovidetwo(2)copiesoftheinformationincludedinanapplication.Thepermittingauthoritywillforwardtotheadministratorone(l)copyofeachpermitapplicationandeachfinaloperatingpermit.(b)Administrator'sobjection.Nopermitshallbeissuedunderthisruleiftheadministratorobjectstoitsissuanceinwritingwithinforty-five(45)daysafterreceiptoftheproposedpermitandallnecesCODEOfSTATEREGULATIONSsarysupportinginformation.(c)Failuretorespondtoobjection.Ifthepermittingauthoritydoesnotrespondtoanobjectionoftheadministratorbytransmittingarevisedproposedpermitwithinninety(90)daysafterreceiptofthatobjection,theadministratormayissueordenythepermitinaccordancewiththeAct.(d)Publicpetitionsforobjection.Iftheadministratordoesnotobjecttoaproposedpermitanypersonmaypetitiontheadministratortomakesuchanobjectionwithinsixty(60)daysafterexpirationoftheadministrator'sforty-five(45)-dayreviewperiod.I.Thispetitionmayonlybebasedonobjectionsraisedduringthepublicreviewprocess,unlessthepetitionerdemonstratesthatitwasimpracticabletoraiseobjectionduringthepublicreviewperiod(includingwhenthegroundsforobjectionaroseafterthatperiod).II.Iftheadministratorrespondstoapetitionfiledunderthissectionbyissuinganobjection,·thepermittingauthoritywillnotissuethepermituntiltheobjectionhasbeenresolved.Ifthepermitwasissuedaftertheadministrator'sforty-five(45)-dayreviewperiod,andpriortoanyobjectionbytheadministrator,thepermittingauthority shalltreatthatobjectionasiftheadministratorwerereopeningthepermitforcause.Inthesecircumstances,thepetitiontotheadministratordoesnotstaytheeffectivenessoftheissuedpermit,andthepermitteeshallnotbeinviolationoftherequirementtohavesubmittedacompleteandtimelypermitapplication.(II)Affectedstatereview.(a)Noticeofdraftactions.Thepermittingauthoritywillgivenoticeofeachdraftpermittoanyaffectedstateonorbeforethetimethatthepermittingauthorityprovidesnoticetothepublic.Affectedstatesmaycommentonthedraftpermitactionduringtheperiodallowedforpubliccomment,asshallbesetforthinanoticetoaffectedstates.(b)Refusaltoacceptrecommendations.Ifthepermittingauthorityrefusestoacceptalln:commendationsforaproposedpermitactionthatanyaffectedstatehassubmittedduringthereviewperiod,thepermittingauthorityshallnotifytheadministratorandtheaffectedstateinwritingofitsreasonsfornotacceptingthoserecommendations.B.Proposalsforreview.Followingtheendofthepubliccommentperiod,thepermittingauthorityshallprepareandsubmittotheadministratoraproposedpermit.(I)Theproposedpermitshallbeissuednolaterthanforty-five(45)daysafter5710CSR1o.&-DEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCESthedeadlineforfinalactionunderthissectionandshallcontainallapplicablerequirementsthathavebeenpromulgatedandmadeapplicabletotheinstallationasofthedateofissuanceofthedraftpermit.(II)Ifnewrequirementsarepromulgatedorotherwisebecomenewlyapplicabletotheinstallationfollowingtheissuanceofthedraftpermit,butbeforeissuanceofafinalpermit,thepermittingauthoritymayelecttoeither-(a)Extendorreopenthepubliccommentperiodtosolicitcommentonadditionaldraftpermitprovisionstoimplementthenewrequirements;or(b)Ifthepermittingauthoritydeterminesthatthisextensionorreopeningofthepubliccommentperiodwoulddelayissuanceofthepermitunduly,thepermittingauthoritymayincludeintheproposedorfinalpermit,orboth,aprovisionstatingthattheoperatingpermitwillbereopenedimmediatelytoincorporatethenewrequirementsandstatingthatthenewrequirementsareexcludedfromtheprotectionofthepermitshield.Ifthepermittingauthorityelectstoissuetheproposedorfinalpermit,orboth,withoutincorporatingthenewrequirements,thepermittingauthority,withinthirty(30)daysafterthenewrequirementsbecomeapplicabletothesource,shallinstituteproceedingspursuanttothissectiontoreopenthepermittoincorporatethenewrequirements.Thesereopeningproceedingsmaybeinstituted,butneednotbecompleted,beforeissuanceofthefinalpermit.C.Actionfollowingtheadministrator'sreview.(I)Uponreceiptofnoticethattheadministratorwillnotobjecttoaproposedpermitthathasbeensubmittedfortheadministrator'sreviewpursuanttothissection,thepermittingauthorityshallissuethepermitassoonaspracticable,butinnoeventlaterthanthefifthdayfollowingreceiptofthenoticefromtheadministrator.(II)furty-five(45)daysaftertransmittalofaproposedpermitfortheadministrator'sreview,andiftheadministratorhasnotnotifiedthepermittingauthoritythats/heobjectstotheproposedpermitaction,thepermittingauthorityshallpromptlyissuethepermit,butinnoeventlaterthanthefiftiethdayfollowingtransmittaltotheadministrator.(110Iftheadministratorobjectstotheproposedpermit,thepermittingauthorityshallconsultwiththeadministratorandtheapplicant,andshallsubmitarevisedproposaltotheadministratorwithinninety(90)daysafterthedateoftheadministrator'sobjection.Ifthepermittingauthoritydoesnotrevisethepermit,thepermittingauthoritywillso58informtheadministratorwithinninety(90)daysfollowingthedateoftheobjectionanddeclinetomakethoserevisions.Iftheadministratordisagreeswiththepermittingauthority,theadminist.ratormayissuethepermitwiththerevisionsincorporated.13.Notificationinwriting.Aftermakingafinaldeterminationwhetherthepermitshouldbeapproved,approvedwithconditions,ordenied,thepermittingauthorityshallnotifytheapplicantinwritingofthefinaldeterminationandthetotalpermitprocessingfeesdue.14.Noticeofprocessingfeesdue.Ifpaymentofpermitprocessingfeeshasnotbeenreceivedfromtheapplicanteighty(80)calendardaysafterthefinaldetermination,thepermittingauthorityshallissueinwritingtotheapplicantafmalnoticeofpaymentdue.15.Processingfeesunpaid.Ifpaymentofpermitprocessingfeeshasnotbeenreceivedfromtheapplicantninety(90)calendardaysafterthefinaldetermination,thepermittingauthorityshallnotifytheapplicantthatthepermithasbeendenied,providedtheapplicationpreviouslyhadbeenapprovedinthefinaldetermination.Thepermittingauthorityalsoshalladvisetheapplicantthatthefeeisstilldueand,asspecifiedinparagraph(10)(A)3.ofthisrule,thefeeshallhaveinterestimposeduponitfromthedateofbillinguntilpaymentismade.16.Paymentreceived.Nolaterthanthree(3)calendardaysafterreceiptofthewholeamountofthefeedue,thepermittingauthoritywillsendtheapplicantanoticeofpaymentreceived.Thepermitwillalsobeissuedatthistime,providedthefinaldeterminationwasforapprovalandthepermitprocessingfeewastimelyrei:eived.·(B)AppendixB,PublicParticipation.I.Thissubsectionshallapplytoapplicationsforunifiedreview,aswellasapplicationsundersections(7)and(8)ofthisrule,applicationsforsourceoperationsorinstallationsemittingfive(5)ormoretonsofleadperyear,andapplicationscontainingGEPstackheightdemonstrationsasdefinedin10CSRl0-6.020(1)(G)3.A.-C.2.furthoseapplicationssubjecttosection(7)or(8)ofthisrule,completingthefinaldeterminationwithinonehundredeighty-four(184)daysafterreceiptofacompleteapplicationinvolvesperformingthefollowingactionsinatimelymanner;A.Preliminarydetermination.Withinninety(90)daysafterreceiptofacompleteapplication,thepermittingauthorityshallmakeapreliminarydeterminationwhetherconstructionshouldbeapproved,approvedwithconditions,ordenied;B.DraftforpubliccommentandpubCODEOFSTATEREGULATIONSDivision1G-AirConservationCommissionliehearingopportunity.Nolaterthanten(10)daysafterthecloseofthepreliminaryreviewperiod,thepermittingauthorityshallissueadraftpermitandsolicitcommentsbypublishinganoticeinanewspaperofgeneralcirculationwithinornearesttothecountyinwhichtheprojectisproposedtobeconstructedoroperated.Thepublicnoticeshalldescribethenatureoftheapplication,including,withreasonablespecificity,thefollowing:name,address,phonenumber,andrepresentativeoftheagencyissuingthepublicnotice;nameandaddressoftheapplicant;andtheproposedproject,includingitslocationandpermitsappliedfor;adescriptionoftheamountandlocationofemissionreductionsthatwilloffsettheemissionsincreasefromthenewormodifiedsource;andincludeinformationonhowLAERwasdeterminedfortheproject(whereappropriate).Thepublicnoticeshallalsoincludedegreeofincrementconsumption,whenappropriate,thepermittingauthority'spreliminarydeterminationofwhetherornottoapprove,approvewithconditionsordeny,andanyreferencetoconditionsrelatingtovisibilityasrequiredinparagraph(8)(C)5.ofthisrule.Thenoticeshallstatethatthedepartmentwillholdapublichearingifoneisrequested,atwhichtimeanyinterestedpersonmaysubmitanyrelevantinformation,materials,andviewsinsupponoforopposedtothepermitappliedfor.Thenoticeshallstatethelocationandtimeofthepublichearingwiththehearingbeingheldinthecountyinwhichalloramajorpartoftheproposedprojectistobelocatedandstatethatthehearingwillbecanceledifarequestforahearingisnotreceivedwithintwenty-eight(28)daysofthepublicationofthenotice.Thehearingshallbeschedulednotlessthanthirty(30)normorethanforty(40)daysfromthedateofpublicationofthenotice.Thenoticealsoshallstatethatanyinterestedpersonmaysubmitrelevantinformationmaterialsandviewstothepermittingauthority,inwriting,untiltheendofthefortiethdayafterthedateofpublicationofthenoticeforpublichearing.Thenoticeshallfurtherstatethatacopyofmaterialssubmittedbytheapplicantandusedinmakingthepreliminarydetermination,acopyofthepreliminarydetermination,andacopyorsummaryofothermaterials,ifany,consideredinmakingthepreliminarydeterminationareavailableforpublicinspectionattheDepartmentofNaturalResources'regionalofficeintheregioninwhichtheproposedinstallationormajormodificationwouldbeconstructed,aswellasattheJeffersonCityCentralOfficeoftheAirPollutionControlProgram.Thepermittingauthorityshallsubmitacopyofthispublicnoticetotheadministrator;(7f31f11)ROBINCARNAHANSecretaryofStateChapter6-AirQualityStandards,Definitions,Samplingand.ReferenceMethodsandAirPollutionControlRegulationsfortheEntireStateofMissouriC.Availabilityofpreliminarydetermination.Afterthecloseofthepreliminaryreviewperiod,butnolaterthanthedatepublicnoticeispublished,thepermittingauthorityshallmakeavailabletothepublic,untiltheendofthepubliccommentperiod,attheregionalofficeintheregioninwhichtheproposedinstallationormajormodificationwouldbeconstructed,aswellasintheAirPollutionControlProgramOfficeinJeffersonCity,acopyofthepreliminarydetermination,andacopyofsummaryofothermaterials,ifany,consideredinmakingthepreliminarydetermination;D.Thepermittingauthoritymaydesignateanotherpersontoconductanyhearingunderthissection;E.Distributionofpublicnotice.Withinten(10)daysafterthecloseofthepreliminaryreviewperiod,thepermittingauthorityshallsendacopyofthepublicnoticetotheapplicantandtoofficialsandagencieshavingcognizanceoverthelocationwheretheproposedconstructionwouldoccurasfollows:localairpollutioncontrolagencies,thechiefexecutiveofthecityandcountywheretheinstallationormodificationwouldbelocated,anycomprehensiveregionallanduseplanningagency,anystateairprogrampermittingauthority,andanyFederalLandManager(FLM)whoselandsmaybeaffectedbyemissionsfromtheinstallationormodification;F.Publiccommentandapplicantresponse.Thepermittingauthorityshallconsiderallwrittencommentssubmittedwithinthetimespecifiedinthepublicnoticeandallcommentsreceivedatthepublichearing,ifoneisheld,inmakingafinaldecisionontheapprovabilityoftheapplication.Nolaterthanten(10)daysafterthecloseofthepubliccommentperiod,theapplicantmaysubmitawrittenresponsetoanycommentssubmittedbythepublic.Thepermittingauthorityshallconsidertheapplicant'sresponseinmakingafinaldecision.Thepermittingauthorityshallmakeallcommentsavailableforpublicinspection.inthesamelocationswherethepermittingauthoritymadeavailableprehearinginformationrelatingtotheproposedinstallationormodification.Further,thepermittingauthorityshallpreparewrittenresponsetoallcommentsandmakethemavailableatthelocationsreferredtopreviously;G.Finaldetermination.Thepermittingauthorityshallmakeafinaldeterminationwhetherconstructionshouldbeapproved,approvedwithconditions,ordeniedpursuanttothisrule,thennotifytheapplicantinwritingofthefinaldeterminationandmakethisnotificationavailableforpublicinspectionatthesamelocationswheretheROBINCARNAHANSecretaryofState(7131111)permittingauthoritymadeavailableprehearinginformationandpubliccommentsrelatingtotheinstallationormodification.Thepermittingauthorityshallsubmitacopyofthisfinaldeterminationtotheadministrator;H.Publicnoticeexception.Ifthe.administratorhasprovidedpublicnoticeandopportunityforpubliccommentandhearingequivalenttothatprovidedbythissubsection,thepermittingauthoritymaymakeafinaldeterminationwithoutprovidingpublicnoticeandopportunityforpubliccommentandhearingrequiredbythissubsection;andI.ClassIareavisibilityreviewandnoticetotheFLM.(I)Forproposedinstallationsubjecttospecificpermitrequirementsinsections(7)and(8)ofthisrule,butnotdependentonanyquantityofleademissionsasstatedinparagraph(12)(B)l.ofthisrule,thepermittingauthorityshallprovideadvancenotificationtoanyFLMwhere,inthejudgmentofthepermittingauthority,visibilitymaybeaffectedinaClassIareaoftheFLM'sresponsibility.Thenoticeshallbeprovidedwithinthirty(30)daysofreceiptofaninitialapplicationorwhenfirstlearningoftheapplicant'sintentforapermit.(II)Nolaterthanthirty(30)daysafterreceiptofacompleteapplication,thepermittingauthority shallmakewrittennotificationtotheFLMwhoseClassIarea(thosedesignatedinparagraph(12)(1)3.ofthisrule)maybeaffectedbyemissions fromtheproposedsource.ThenOtificationmustincludeallinformationrelevanttothepermitapplicationandshallincludeananalysisofanticipatedClassIvisibilityimpacts.ThepermittingauthoritymayalsomakethisnotificationtoanyadditionalFLMwhoseClassIarea'svisibility,inthejudgmentofthepermittingauthority,maybeimpacted.(Ill)ThepermittingauthorityshallconsideranyanalysisperformedbyanFLMthatisprovidedtothepermittingauthoritywithinthirty(30)daysoftheFLM'sreceiptofthenotificationandanalysisrequiredinpart(l2)(B)2.1.(II)ofthisrule.WheretheFLM'sanalysisindicatesthatanadverseimpactonvisibility(asdefinedinlOCSR10-6.020)wouldoccurinaClassIareaasaresultoftheproposedproject,andanalysisdoesnotdemonstrateanadverseimpacttothepermittingauthority'ssatisfaction,thepermittingauthorityshallsoindicatethedissatisfactioninthepublicnoticeofbearing.Withthiscondition,thepublicnoticealsoshallcontainthelocationwhereanexplanationofthepermittingauthority'sreasoningcanbefound,andthattheexplanationbeavailableforpublicinspectionnolaterthanthedatepublicnoticeispublished.CODEOFSTATEREGULATIONS3.Thisparagraphisforthoseapplicationsnotsubjecttosection(7)or(8)ofthisrule,butwhichproposeanemissionoffive(5)ormoretonsofleadperyearorapplicationscontainingGEPstackheightdemonstrations.Fortheseapplications,completingthefinaldeterminationwithinninety(90)calendardaysafterreceiptofthecompleteapplicationinvolvesperformingthesamepublicparticipationactivitiesasthosesubjecttosection(7)or(8)ofthisrule,butwithshortertimeframes.Thefollowingspecifiesthenewtimeframes:A.Permittingauthority'spreliminarydetermination-Nolaterthanforty-five(45)calendardaysafterreceiptofacompleteapplication;B.Publicnoticeofhearing-Nolaterthanfive(5)calendardaysafterthepreliminarydetermination;C.Publichearing-Nolaterthanthirty(30)calendardaysafterthedateofthepublicnotice;andD.Applicantresponse-Nolaterthanfive(5)calendardaysaftertheendofthepubliccommentperiod,theapplicantmaysubmitawrittenresponsetoanycommentssubmitted.(C)AppendixC,Offsets.Offsetprovisionsmaybefoundin10CSR10-6.410.(D)AppendixD,Banking.BankingprovisionsmaybefoundinlOCSR10-6.410.(E)AppendixE,InnovativeControlTechnology.l.Anowneroroperatorofaninstallationsubjecttosection(8)ofthisrulemayemployasystemofinnovativecontroltechnologyifA.Theapplicantdemonstratestothesatisfactionofthepermittingauthoritythattheproposedcontrolsystemwillnotcauseorcontributetoanunreasonablerisktopublichealth,welfare,orsafetyinitsoperation,function,ormalfunction;B.Theowneroroperatordemonstratestheabilityandagreestoachievealevelofcontinuousemissionreductionequivalenttothatwhichwouldhavebeenrequiredundersubsection(8)(A)ofthisrule,byareasonabledatespecifiedbythepermittingauthority,takingintoconsiderationthetechnicalandeconomicfeasibility.Thedateshallnotbelaterthanfour(4)yearsfromthetimeofstartuporseven(7)yearsfrompermitissuance;C.Onthedatespecifiedbythepermittingauthority,theproposedconstruction,employingthesystemofinnovativecontrol,willmeet_therequirementsof40CFR52.21(1)and40CFR52.21(v);5910CSR10+-DEPARTMENT.OFNATURALRESOURCESD.Theproposedconstructionwouldnot,beforethedatespecifiedbythepermittingauthority-(!)Causeorcontributetoaviolationofanapplicablenationalambientairqualitystandard;(II)ImpactanyClassIarea;or(III)ImpactanyareawhereanapplicableincrementisImowntobeviolated;E.Thegovernorofanyadjacentstatethatwillbesignificantlyimpactedbytheproposedconstructiongiveshis/herconsentbeforethedatespecifiedbythepermittingauthority;andF.Allotherapplicablerequirements,includingthoseforpublicparticipation,havebeenmet.2.Anyapprovaltoemployasystemofinnovativecontroltechnologymayberevokedbythepermittingauthority,ifA.Theproposedsystemfailsorwillfailbythespecifieddatetoachievetherequiredcontinuousemissionreductionrate;orB.Theproposedsystem,beforethespecifieddate,contributesorwillcontributetoanunreasonablerisktopublichealth,welfare,orsafetyinitsoperation,function,ormalfunction;orC.Thepermittingauthoritydeterminesthattheproposedsystemisunlikelytoprotectthepublichealth,welfare,orsafety.3.Ifaninstallationtowhichthissubsectionappliesfailstomeettherequiredlevelofcontinuousemissionreductionwithinthespecifiedtimeperiod,ortheapprovalisrevokedinaccordancewithparagraph(12)(E)2.ofthisrule,theowneroroperatormayrequestthepermittingauthoritytograntanextensionoftimeforaminimumperiodasmaybenecessarytomeettherequirementfortheapplicationofBACTthroughuseofademonstratedsystemofcontrol.Theperiodshallnotextendbeyondthedatethree(3)yearsafterterminationofthesametimeperiodspecifiedinparagraph(12)(E)l.ofthisrule.(F)AppendixF,AirQualityModels.1.Allestimatesandanalysesofambientconcentrationsshallbebasedontheapplicableairqualitymodels,databases,andotherrequirementsspecifiedintheEnvironmentalProtectionAgency's(EPA)GuidelineonAirQualityModels(40CFRPart51,AppendixW)includingsupplementsatthetimeofapplication.2.Anymodel(s)designatedinparagraph(12)(F)l.ofthisrulemaybeadjusteduponadeterminationbytheadministratorandthepermittingauthority,afternoticeandopportunityforpublichearing,thattheadjustmentisnecessarytotakeintoaccountuniqueter60rainormeteorologicalcharacteristicsofanareapotentiallyaffectedbyemissionsfromthesource.MethodslikethoseoutlinedintheProtocolforDeterminingtheBestPerformingModel(UnitedStatesEPApublicationNo.EPA-454/R-92-025,OfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandan;ls,ResearchTrianglePark,NC27711,1992)"andStandardGuideforStatisticalEvaluationofAJmosphericDispersionModelPerformance(NTISNo.PB93-226082)shouldbeusedtodeterminethecomparabilityofairqualitymodels.3.WheretheGuidelineonAirQualityModels(40CFRPart51,AppendixW)includingsupplementsatthetimeofapplica-.tiondoesnotaddressasituationrequiringmodeling,theadministratorandthepermittingauthority,afternoticeandopportunityforpublichearing,mayapprovetheuseofamodelwhichtheydeemaccurateformodelingthatsituation.(G)AppendixG,IncrementTracking.1.Thepermittingauthoritywilltrackambientairincrementconsumptionatfixedbaselinelocationswithinthebaselineareas.2.Availableincrementwillbeallocatedonafirst-come,first-servebasis.Themarkedreceiveddateofacompleteapplicationwillbeusedbythepermittingauthoritytodeterminewhichapplicantisentitledtopriorallocationofincrements.3.Attheintervalsoffive(5)yearsfromthebaselinedate,thepermittingauthorityshalldeterminetheactualairqualityincrementavailableorconsumedforalocation(s)forwhichcompleteairmonitoringdataexistsusingsubsection(ll)(C),Table3,ofthisrule.4.Exclusionsfromincrementconsumption.Uponwrittenrequestoftheowneroroperatorofaninstallation,madeafternoticeandopportunityforatleastone(1)publichearingtobeheldinaccordancewiththeproceduresestablishedinsubsection(12)(B)ofthisrule,thepermittingauthorityshallexcludethefollowingconcentrationsindeterminingconsumptionofamaximumallowableincrease:A.Concentrationsattributabletotheincreaseinemissionsfrominstallationswhichhaveconvertedfromtheuseofpetroleumproducts,naturalgas,orboth,byreasonofanorderineffectundersections2(a)and(b)oftheEnergySupplyEnvironmentalCoordinationActof1974overtheemissionsfromthosesourcesbeforetheeffectivedateoftheorder;B.ConcentrationsattributabletotheincreaseinemissionsfrominstallationswhichhaveconvertedfromusingnaturalgasbyreasonofanaturalgascurtailmentplanineffectpursuanttotheFederalPowerActoverCODEOFSTATEREGULATIONSDivision10-AirConservationCommissiontheemissionsfromthosesourcesbeforetheeffectivedateoftheplan;C.Concentrationsofparticulatematterattributabletotheincreaseinemissionsfromconstructionorothertemporaryemission-relatedactivities,however;D.Noexclusionoftheseconcentrationsshallapplymorethanfive(5)yearsaftertheeffectivedateoftheordertowhichsubparagraph(12)(G)4.A.ofthisrulerefersortheplantowhichsubparagraph(12)(G)4.B.ofthisrulerefers,whicheverisapplicable.Ifboththeorderandtheplanareapplicable,noexclusionshallapplymorethanfive(5)yearsafterthelateroftheeffectivedates,(H)AppendixH,ImpactsonClassIAreas.1.Atanytimepriortothecloseofthepubliccommentperiodspecifiedinsubsection(l2)(B)ofthisrule,theFLMforanyfederalClassIareamayprovideinformationtothepermittingauthoritydemonstratingthattheemissionsfromtheproposedinstallationormajormodificationwouldhaveanadverseimpactontheairquality-relatedvalues(includingvisibility)ofanyfederalmandatoryClassIarea,notwithstandingthatthechangeinairquality,resultingfromemissionsfromtheinstallationormajormodification,wouldnotcauseorcontributetoconcentrationswhichwouldexceedthemaximumallowableincreaseforaClassIarea,asspecifiedinsubsection(ll)(A),Thble1,ofthisrule.IfthepermittingauthorityconcursinthedemonstrationbytheFLM,thepermitshallbedenied.2.ClassIvariances.TheowneroroperatorofaproposedinstallationormajormodificationmaydemonstratetotheFLMthattheemissionsfromthesourcewouldhavenoadverseimpactontheairquality-relatedvaluesofanyfederalmandatoryClassIarea(includingvisibility),notwithstandingthatthechangeinairqualityresultingfromemissionsfromthesourcewouldcauseorcontributetoconcentrationswhichwouldexceedthemaximumallowableincreasesforaClassIarea.IftheFLMconcurswithademonstrationandsocertifiestothepermittingauthority,thepermittingauthority,providingthatallotherapplicablerequirementsofthisrulearemet,mayissuethepermitwiththoseemissionlimitationsasmaybenecessarytoassurethatemissionsofsulfurdioxide,particulatematter,andnitrogendioxidewouldnotexceedthefollowingmaximumallowableincreasesoverbaselineconcentrationforthesepollutants:(7/31/11)ROBINCARNAHANSecretaryofStateChapter6--AirQualityStandards,Definitions,SamplingandReferenceMethodsandAirPollutionControlRegulationsfortheEntireStateofMissouri10CSR111-6MaximumAllowablePollutantIncreaseParticulateMatter10Micron:Annualarithmeticmean1724-hourmaximum30SulfurDioxide:Annualarithmeticmean2024-hourmaximum913-hourmaximum325NitrogenDioxide:Annual arithmeticmean25Note:Increasesareinmicrogramspercubicmeter.3.SulfurdioxidevariancebygovernorwithFLM'sconcurrence.A.IftheowneroroperatorofaproposedinstallationormajormodificationwhohasbeendeniedanFLM'scertificationpursuanttoparagraph(12)(H)l.ofthisruledemonstratestothegovernorthattheinstallationormajormodificationcannotbeconstructedasaresultofanymaximumallowableincreaseforsulfurdioxideforperiodsoftwenty-four(24)hoursorlessapplicabletoanyClassIareaand,inthecaseoffederalmandatoryClassIareas,thatavarianceunderthispartwouldnotadverselyaffecttheairquality-relatedvaluesofthearea(includingvisibility),thenthegovernor,afterconsiderationoftheFLM'srecommendation(ifany)andsubjecttohis/herconcurrence,niaygrant,afternoticeandanopportunityforapublichearing,avariancefromthesemaximumallowableincreases.B.Ifavarianceisgranted,thepermittingauthoritymayissueapermittoaninstallationormajormodificationinaccordancewiththerequirementsofparagraph(12)(H)5.ofthisrule,providedthatallotherapplicablerequirementsofthisrulearemet.4.Variancebythegovernorwiththepresident'sconcurrence.A.TherecommendationsofthegovernorandtheFLMshallbetransferredtothepresidentinanycasewherethegovernorrecommendsavarianceinwhichtheFLMdoesnotconcur.B.Ifthisvarianceisapprovedbythepresidentpursuantto42U.S.C.A.section7475(d)(2)(D)(ii),thepermittingauthoritymayissueapermitinaccordancewiththerequirementsofparagraph(12)(H)5.ofthisruleprovidedthatallotherapplicablerequirementsofthisrulearemet.5.Emissionlimitationsforpresidentialorgubernatorialvariance.A.Inthecaseofapermitissuedpursuanttoparagraph(12)(H)3.or4.ofthisrule,thepermittingauthorityshallimpose,asROBINCARNAHANSec:fetaryofState(7/31/11)conditionsofthepermit,emissionlimitationsasmaybenecessarytoassurethatemissionsofsulfurdioxidefromtheinstallationormajormodification(duringanydayonwhichtheotherwiseapplicablemaximumallowableincreasesareexceeded)willnotcauseorcontributetoconcentrationswhichwillexceedthefollowingmaximumallowableincreasesoverthebaselineconcentration:MaximumAllowableIncrease(microgramspercubicmeter)PeriodofE!posure24-hourmaximum3-hourTerrainAreasLowHigh3662130221B.Theseemissionlimitationsalsoshallassurethattheemissionswillnotcauseorcontributetoconcentrationswhichexceedtheotherwiseapplicablemaximumallowableincreasesforperiodsofexposureoftwentyfour(24)hoursorlessformorethaneighteen(18)days,notnecessarilyconsecutive,duringanyannualperiod.6.Thepermittingauthorityshalltransmittotheadministratoracopyofeachpermitapplicationunderthissubsection(12)(H)ofthisruleandprovidenoticetotheadministratorofeveryactionrelatedtotheconsiderationofapermit.(I)AppendixI,AttainmentandUnclassifiedAreaDesignations.1.Areaclassification.A.ThefollowingareasshallbeClassIareasandmaynotberedesignated:(I)HerculesGladeNationalWildernessArea;and(II)MingoNationalWildernessArea.B.Anyotherarea,unlessspecifiedinthelegislationcreatingsuchanarea,isinitiallydesignatedClassII,butmayberedesignatedasprovidedinthissection.C.ThefollowingareasmayberedesignatedonlyasClassIorII:(I)AnareawhichasofAugust7,1977,exceededtenthousand(10,000)acresinsizeandwasanationalmonument,anationalprimitivearea,anationalpreserve,anationalrecreationalarea,anationalwildandscenicriver,anationalwildliferefuge,oranationallakeshoreorseashore;and(II)AnationalparkornationalwildernessareaestablishedafterAugust7,1977,whichexceedstenthousand(10,000)acresinsize.2.Arearedesignation.A.Allareas(exceptasotherwiseprovidedunderparagraph(12)(I)l.ofthisrule)aredesignatedClassIIasofDecember5,1974.Redesignation(exceptasprecludedbyCODEOFSTATEREGULATIONSparagraph(12)(I)1.ofthisrule)maybeproposedbythecommissionasprovidedinthisrule,subjecttoapprovalbytheadministrator.B.TheconunissionmaysubmittotheadministratoraproposaltoredesignateareasofthestateasClassIorClassIIprovidedthat-(1)Atleastone(1)publichearinghasbeenheldinaccordancewithproceduresestablishedinsections643.070and643.100,RSMo;(II)OtherstatesandFLMswhoselandsmaybeaffectedbytheproposedredesignationwerenotifiedatleastthirty(30)dayspriortothepublichearing;(Ill)Adiscussionofthereasonsfortheproposedredesignation,includingasatisfactorydescriptionandanalysisofthehealth,environmental,economic,social,andenergyeffectsoftheproposedredesignation,waspreparedandmadeavailableforpublicinspectionatleastthirty(30)dayspriortothehearingandthenoticeannouncingthehearingcontainingappropriatenotificationoftheavailabilityofthatdiscussion;(IV)Priortotheissuanceofnoticerespectingtheredesignationofanareathatincludesanyfederallands,thecommissionhasprovidedwrittennoticetotheappropriateFLMandaffordedadequateopportunity(notinexcessofsixty(60)days)toconferwiththecommissionrespectingtheredesignationandtosubmitwrittencommentsandrecommendations.Inredesignatinganyarea,withrespecttowhichanyFLMhadsubmittedwrittencommentsandrecommendations,thecommissionshallhavepublishedalistofanyinconsistenciesbetweentheredesignationandcommentsandrecommendations(togetherwiththereasonsformakingredesignationagainsttherecommendationoftheFLM);and(V)Thecommissionhasproposedtheredesignationafterconsultationwiththeelectedleadershipoflocalandothersubstategeneralpurposegovernmentsintheareacoveredbytheproposedredesignation.C.Anyareaotherthananareatowhichparagraph(12)(I)l.ofthisrulerefersmayberedesignatedClassIIIif-([)Theredesignationwouldmeettherequirementsofprovisionsestablishedinaccordancewithsubparagraph(12)(1)2.B.ofthisrule;(II)Theredesignationhasbeenapprovedbythecommissionandthegovernor;(ll[)Theredesignationhasbeenapprovedbythegovernorafterconsultationwiththeappropriatecommitteesofthelegislatureifitisinsession,orwiththeleadershipofthelegislatureifitisnotinsession;61**-~**

10 CSR 1fl.6.-DEPARTMENT

OF NATURAL RESOURCES (IV) General purpose units
of local government, representing

a majority

of the residents

of the area

to be redesignated,
adopt resolutions concurring

in the redesignation; (V) The redesignation
would
not cause

or contribute

to

a concentration

of any air pollutant which would exceed any maximum allowable increase permitted under the classification

of any other area or any national ambient

air quality standard;
and (VI) Any permit application

for any installation

or major modification subject

to provisions established

in accordance

with subparagraph (12)(1)2.A.

of this rule which could receive

a permit only

if the area

in question were redesignated

as Class
III and any material submitted

as part of that application were available, insofar

as was practicable, for public inspection
prior

to any public hearing

on redesignacion

of any area
as Class III.

3

. Area class designations. Area Class Class

I Class

II Class
III Description Hercules Glade National Wilderness
Area Mingo National Wilderness
Area All areas
of the state which are not nonattainment No areas designated (J) Appendix

J, Air Quality Analysis

for Hazardous

Air Pollutants. 1. The director shall maintain

a table
of emission threshold levels, risk assessment levels, and screening model action levels for hazardous

air pollutants. Applicants

will not be required

to submit

a hazanlous

air pollu

tant air quality analysis

for applications

hav

ing

a maximum design capacity

no more than the hazardous

air pollutant emission threshold levels unless paragraph (12)(J)2.

of this rule applies. 2. Exceptions

. The director may require an air quality analysis

for applications

if it is likely that the construction

or modifiCation will result

i n the discharge

of air contaminants

in quantities,

of characteristics

and of
a duration which directly
and proximately cause
or contribute

to injury

to human, plant, or animal
life or the use of property

or complaints filed

in the vicinity

of the proposed construction

or modification warrant

an air quality analysis. AUTHORITY: section 643

. 050, RSMo 2000

. * Original
rule filed Dec

. 10

, 1979

, effective April

11, 1980. Amended

: Filed Nov

. 10, 1980, effective April

11, 1981. Amended: 62

Filed Jan. 14, 1981, effective June
11, 1981. Rescinded

and readopted:
Filed Nov.

10

, 1981, effective
May
13

, 1982

. Amended: Filed June 14, 1982

, effective Dec.
11, 1982

. Amended

: Filed Jan

. 15, 1985, effective May 11, 1985. Amended:
Filed Jan.

6, 1986, effective May
11, 1986. Amended: Filed April 2, 1987, effective Aug. 27, 1987. Amended: Filed Jan

. 5, 1988, effective April 28, 1988. Amended: Filed June

2, 1988, effective Sept. 29, 1988

. Amended: Filed Sept

. 6 , 1988, effective Jan.

1, 1989. Amended

: Filed Jan

. 24, 1990

, effective May 24, 1990

. Rescinded and readopted: Filed Sept.

2, 1993, effective May

9, 1994. Amended: Filed Dec. /5, 1994, effective Aug. 30, 1995. Amended: Filed Aug. 14, 1997, effective April 30, 1998

. Amended: FiledApril15,

1999, effective Nov

. 30, 1999. Amended: Filed Sept

. 4, 2001

, effective May 30, 2002

. Amended: Filed Aug.

2, 2002, effective April 30, 2003

. Amended: Filed March

5, 2003, effecljve

Oct

. 30, 2003. Amended: Filed May 17, 2004, effective Dec. 30, 2004. Amended: Filed Oct. 15, 2008, effective July 30, 2009. Emergency amendment filed Dec. 15, 2010, effective
Jan.

3, 2011, expired July

1, 2011. Amended: Filed Nov. 30, 2010, effective Aug

. 30, 2011

. •Orig iM

I a ulhority

: 643

. 050, RSMo 1965

, ame nded 19' n, 1992, /993. 1995

. CODE
OF STATE REGULATIONS

Division 10-Air Conservation Commission (2) Definitions. Definitions

for certain
ter specified

in this rule may be found

in 10 CS 0-6

. 020

. General Provisions.

The following

c ns ction
or modifications

are not requi

to ob
in

a permit under

10 CSR 10-6.060 (

) Exempt Emission Units. l. The following combustion

equ

· ment is

pt from

10 CSR 10-6.060
ifth equipment mits only combustion produ

, and the ipment produces

less than
hundred

fi )Y (150) pounds
per day contam1

nt: Any combustion
equip
ent using natural
gas or liquefie petroleum ombination

of these

ith

a capacan ten (10) million ritish thertus) per hour heat

· put; combustion

eq pment with

a s than one (l) illion Btus per th

a total production products

of less than pounds
per operating trically

or exclusively th

a maximum capac0) illion Btus per hour. ing stablishments,

systems, equipment,

o rations
are exempt from

10 CSR 10., .060: tion; D

. Livestock markets

and oper ·ons, including animal feed

' operation and concentrated animal feeding peratio

as those terms
are defined

by
4 CFR 12

. 23 and all manure storage
and appli tion ms associated
with livestock marke

or tock operations,

that were construe

on before November

30, 2003. This exemp

on eludes
any change, installation,

cons tion,

or reconstruction

of

a process, proce (7/31/11)

ROBIN CARNAHAN Secretmy

of StateOrder

of Rulemaking Pursuant

to 643.055 RSMo,
the Missouri

Air Conservation Commission

has determined

that this action

is needed

to have

a U .S. Environmental Protection Agency approved State Implementation

Plan. 10 CSR 10-6

. 060 {amendment) Construction Permits Required

is hereby AMENDED

by the Missouri

Air Conservation Commission

this 28th day of April, 2011

.

, Member **-;::::j~i::=-b' el"'"""A::;........&..>~C-""-** 

**, """"""WS~cr"""'""JMJ____;;;;~--·** 

Member **~,L~~~~c::;-1-J ~fl~L~** 

... **~=====---•**

Member _____ _____________________________________

, Member _______________________

__ ________

, Member

# PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF MISSOURI,)

_ )ss. COUNTY OF COLE)

Mike Vivion being duly sworn, according to law, says he is Vice President of Central Missouri Newspapers, Inc., Publisher of the News Tribune, a newspaper printed and published in the County of Cole, and State aforesaid; that said newspaper has been published continuously for more than three years; and that the notice hereto attached was published in said paper in compliance with the provisions of Section 493.050

R.S. of Mo. For 2000 as amended for 1 time 

# as follows:

1st 

# insertion, No. 28th 

# day of February 

# '20 11



# 2nd insertion, No. day of 

# '20

3rd 

# insertion, No. 

# ' day of '20


# 4th. . N msert10n, L 

# o. 

# ' day of '20


# 5th insertion, No. 7 

# day of

- -• 20

Fee: $358.00

# ~~ Subscribed and sworn to before me tlus 1st


# day of March
, 20 11 

# ftJtJJJJrf1_ fSWr/UJW?.Lfj

Notary Public,
My term as Notary Public expires • ::

. -

# MISSOURI AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSJON**~·** 

# WILL HOLD PUBLIC HEARING

.

.

# ~EicfERSON 

# 'SI;(Y._ MO

-- The

# sso~.tri Air Conservation· Commission wtn c

· o a public heaMg on the St. Louis o:z:one nonattalnment area reasonably available control technology (RACT) rules and RACT demonstration u date· the gr':'enhouse gas permitting rules; the hospital, medical and

# inf/ctlou~ w20a1s1te ITnhoelneprabtol.r rHuJe; _and general conformity rule on Thursday March 31 • u IC 

# eanng will begJ at 9 · · · ' · .,**Cente~** 

# 1730 East El · St n a.m. at the Elm Street.Conference Room 'Jerre Cl m reet, Lower Level, Bennett SprinDs Conference



# , •**~son_** 

# ty, Missouri. The 

# commission will**he~** 

# tes«mony rwll!iltBd.

# ~i~~~~illow•~g**dt~m(s).** Note that all but the last two following ttems were

· canceled

# d~c te _u e 1 d for a .FE!bruary 3, 2011 public hearing that was

' " 10 e o 1nc ement weather.
S rf . 

# CSCR 10-5.330 (amendment) Control of Emls$lons from Industrial_ u ace eating Operatlonli 

# i
This proposed

# a~e~dme~t**~ru** exempt facilities that are regulated

# under**~** other rules that hm1t emiSSions of volatile organic compounds and incorporate changes in Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for

# surfa~e**coat~ng** operations in the St. Louis. o:z:ons nonattalnment area to be ;ons1stent w1th the current federal RACT guidance documents.

10 CSR 10-5.340 (amendment) Control of Emissions from Rotogravure and Flexographic Printing Operations This proposed amendment will add spe.clflc emilision limits of volatile. orgamc compounds for flexible package printing operations in the St.. Louis · ozone nonattainment area. This will make the limits consistent with the
cur r ent federal' Reasonably Available Control Technology guidance documents. 

# ..

* 10 CSR 10-5.442 (amendment) Contrpl, of 

# Emissions from Uthographlo Printing Operations · · This proposed amendment will add specific· emission limits of volatile organic compounds for both offse1 lithogr&Ptilc and letterpress printing operations In the St. Lo1,1is ozone nonattain.ment area. This will make the limits consistent with the current federal Jleasonably Available Control Technology guidance documents. The amendment will also remove deflnl· tlons that will now be found In 1 0 CSR 1 0-6.020. 

# * 1 0 CSR 1 0·5.455 (amendment) Control of Emission from Solvent Cleanup Operations This propo11ed amendment will lower the allowable emissions threshold fo volatile organic compounds released per day from the use, storage and dis· posal of industrial cleaning solvents, add requirements for facilities that exceed the threshold, and incorporate changes to be consistent with the.
, current federal Reasonably Available Contrql Technology guidance documents. This rule applies to the St. Louis o:z:one nonattalnment area. 

# * 10 CSR 10-6.020 (amendment) Definitions and Common Reference Tables This proposed amenilment will add all definitions
, currently found in individual Division 1 o air rules into the general definitions rule unless a specific reason exists for a definition to be unique to a specific rule. 

# * 10 CSR 10·6.060 (amendment) Construction Permits Required**·~This** 

# proposed amendment incorporates federal. permitting requirements that will cover new construction pro]ectli thl!.t emit 1 00,000 tons per year**or ~**  

# more 

# of greenhouse gases and clarifies rule text. 

# I

* 1 o CSR 1 0-6.065 (amendment) Operating Permits This proposed amendment Incorporates federal permitting req1,1irements for greenhouse gas emissions, removes definitions that will now be .found inl • regulation 1 0 CSR 1 0-6.020, streamlines the public notice procedure to align with the Federal Register, and allows the flexibility to publish notices on·theweb. 

# * 10 CSR ·10-6.200 (amendment) H06pital, Medical, lnfectiouli Wast ln- 1 clnerators Th.ls proposed amendment 

# Will update the state regulatory requirements for emission limits, waste management planli, compliance and performance testing, monitoring, a,nd reporting ai'ld record keeping to be consistent with the recent federal update to 4Q 

# CFR Part 60 and remove definitions that will
now be found In 1 0 CSR 1 0-6.020. 

# * 10 CSR 10-6.300 (amendment) Conformity 

# of General Federal Actions to S1ate Implementation Plans .This prop06ed amendment will update the .state general conformity rule to comply with the recently revised federal general ·conformity rul!'**publish~d** 

# in the April 5, 201 o edition of the Federlll Register. Incorporating the latest •. federal regulations 

# will ensure that ail federal actions conform to the state's implementation plan and will not cause or contribute to violations 

# of the na· tional ambient air quality standards. 

# * Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Demonstration Update for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard St. LOuis Nonattalnment Area The Clean. Alr Act requires moderate ozone nonattainment areas, such as St. Lou Is, to submit a demonstration that current rules fulfill RACT ·Under the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air**Q~allty** 

# Standard (NAAQS) for volatile organic compounds ·for all Control Technique Guidelines (CTG)

_ categories and all major, noh-CTG sources 

# 1JS a revision to their State Implementation Plan. This document updates the RACT demonstration submttted to the EPA in 2007 and certifies ·that current rules, incluriing those

. proposed for amendment, fulfill RACT**requi~ements** 

# for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. Documents for the above item(s) will be :available for review at the Mi6Sourl Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, 1659 Elm Street, .Jefferson City, (573) 751-4817 

# eng .in**t~e** 

# Public Notices.**s~ction** 

# of the program web site www.dnr.mo.gov/env/apcp/index.html. Th1s Information will be available at least 30 days prior to the public hearing date. Persons with disabilities requiring special services or accommodations to attend the meeting can make· ftrrengements by calling the Department directly at (573) 526-4679, the Department's toll free number at (BOO) 

# 334-6946, or by writing two weeks in advance of the meeting to: Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Air Conservation Commission**.Se r~ill** **""** 

# PO 6r; l( 176. Jef!erst;ln C ity

. MO 651 02.· Hearina impaired per- ,. .. . - ....-....

, .1

**r~**

**1 ~**  1 1

. MIDwEsT •

[

. I T

I GAT

I 0 **1~** SERVICES COURT REPORTING

& ''IDE

0

**~** - - BEFORE THE AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSION STATE
OF MISSOURI

' " r' ,_

. MISSOURI

AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEETING MEETING MARCH

31, 2011 NATIONWIDE ScHEouu

N G MISSOURI

Sp rir. (!fi

" ld

**·~ ffd**  **son** Cit;

· :Za:lsa: City

Co

: u mJ

i Rol

l ._ C."

"' G i:

· a rc

. a u

' " KANSAS

uv·

r l -·nC: P•.

r •

•

I LLIN
OI S Sprl

. • **g~td.: ~~.:**  **-,oou.;**
**,TE;:**

**:** 7

1 1 NoRTH ELEVENTH STREET,

S
r

. Lour

s, M rssouRr

63

1 01 8 00.280

. 33

7 6 'N w

' N

. :-: 1

i 0 ;; : 2 £

l

:
**~** t

**~** 9

' ' t

; c 11

• c o rr :MEETING3/31/2011Page21PR0CE E DINGS2CHAIRMANGARNETT:I'mgo1ngtocallto3ordertbepublichearing.Thehearingwillcometo4order.Lettherecordshowthefollowing5Commissionersarepresent:MarkGarnett,Gary6Pendergrass,RonBoyer,JackBakerandDavid7Zimmermann.8AirConservationCommission,theState9ofMissouri,hascalledthispublichearingpursuant10toSection643.070,RevisedStatutesofMissouri,EPA11promulgatedRule40CFR51.102,forthepurposeof12hearingtestimonyrelatingto10CSR10-6.02013{illnendment),DefinitionsandCommonReferenceTables;1410CSR5.330(amendment),ControlofEmissionsfrom15IndustrialSurfaceCoatingOperations;1510CSR10-5.340(amendment),CantrallofEmissionsJ7fromRotogravureandFlexographicPrinting18Operations;10CSR10-5.442(amendment),Controlof19EmissionsfromLithographicPrintingOperations;2010CSR10-5.455(amendment),ControlofEmissionfrom21SolventCleanupOperations;ReasonablyAvailableControlTechnologyDemonstrationUpdateforthe1997238-hourOzoneStandardSt.LouisNonattainmentArea;2410CSR10-6.060(amendment),ConstructionPermits25Required;10CSR10-6.065(amendment),OperatingwWW.midwestlitigation.comMIDWESTLITIGATIONSERVICESPhone:1.800.280.3376Fax:314.644.1334MEETING 3/31/2011

Page
38 1 that the cu rrent complement

o f St. Louis area VOC 2 RACT rules,

in cl uding four proposed amendments

to 3 a

d d ress new CT Gs, ful fil

l th

e RAC

T requir

em ent

s for 4 the 199 7' 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 5

If the Commission adopts this RAC

T 6 demonstration update,

i t wil

l be the departme

n t's 7 in te ntion

to submit this demonstra

tio

n to the

U .S. 8 Environmental Protection Agency
for inclusion

in the 9 Missouri State Implementation

Plan. 10 Commissioners,

this concludes

my 11

t est imony unless you ha
v e any questions

.

. 12 CHAIRMAN GARNETT:

J o e, thanks.
Paul 13 Myers

. 1 4

(The witn

e ss was

. sworn.) 15

MR. MYERS

: Good morn

i ng

, Commissioners

. 16
My name
is Paul Myers.

I work
as an environmental 17 specialist
with the Air Pollution Control Program 18 located

at 1659 East Elm
St

r eet in Jefferson City, 19 Missouri. 20

I'm here today

to present

t es timon

y on 21 two rule amendments

to comply with Federal 22
En
v ironmental

Pr
o tection Agen cy regulations

that 23 require greenhouse

gas permit

t ing. These rules are 24

10 CSR
10

- 6

. 060

, Construction Permits Required,

and 25 10-6.065, Operating Permits. Since both rule v ww

. midwestlitigation.com
MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES Phone: 1.800.280.3376

Fax: 314.644.1334Page 1696

Orders

ot Aulemakln

g

July

1, 2011 V o l. 36,
N o. 13 61. Stationary source-Any building, structure, facility,

or i tallation which emits
or may emit any air pollutant subject

to reg ul ion under
the CAA. Building, structure,

facility

, or

i nstallati inc des all pollutant emitting activities
that are located

on one (1)

r mo contiguous

or adjacent properties

and are under common trol

o the same person(s)

. 6

. Sterx:il coating-An

ink or

a pigmented coating

w applied over

a stencil

in order

to add identifying letters,

SY. and/or mbers. 63. toichiometric
air/fu

e l ratio-The air/fuel ratio here
all fuel and

a oxygen

in the air/fuel mixture will be consu

d. 64.

S ker boiler

- A boiler design that employs

a g te assembly to comb

st coal

. 65. Sto ge container- Vessel

or tank

, includin

mix equipment, used
to old finishing

, cleaning

, or washoff

m rials

. 66. Storag tank-Any
tank

, reservoir,

or vessel hich

is
a container
for liquid

or gases, where

no manufilctur" process

or part of it takes place. 67. Strippabl booth coating-A coating

tha A. Is appli

to

a booth wall

to provide receive overspray

d ing finishing operations; B. Is subsequ

tly peeled
off and disp

d; and C. By achievi

A

. and

B

. above

, re ces or eliminates

the need
to use organic

so nts to clean booth

ls

. 68. Structural
glaz -A process
tha includes

the application of adhesive

to bond

gl ceramic, metal stone,

or composite
panels to exterior building

es

. 69. Subtloor installati n-The

ins lation

of subflooring
material over floor joists, includ

the con truction

of any load-bearing joists. Subflooring

is covere

by

a fm' surface material. 70. Submerged

fill pipe

ny
fi pipe the discharge opening

of which

is entirely submerged

w en

e liquid level

is six inches (6") above
the bottom

of the tank

. S b rged fill pipe when applied

to

a tank which

is loaded from the
si

s defmed

as any fill pipe

, the dis

charge opening

of which

is enti submerged when the liquid level i s eighteen

in c hes (18")

or

c the diameter

of the till pipe, whichever

is greater, above the

tt of the tank

. 71. Submerged filling

- he
ti ·ng of

a gasoline storage tank through

a submerged

fill pipe
ith a d charge

no more than

s ix inches (6")
(n o more than rwel inches

2") for submerged

fill pipes installed

on or before

N mber

9,
2 6) from the bottom

of the tank. Bott

o m filling

of ga line storage

nks

is included

in this def

inition. 72

. Submit

or serv

- Th send or

it a docum

e nt

, informa

tion,
or corresponden

to the person spec the applicable regulaf

nA. In person· B. By Unite States Postal Service;

or C. By oth means

of dispatch

or trans

iss ion and delivery. Compliance

with

ny "submission," "service

,"

r umailing" deadline

s hall be de rmined

by the date
of di

s patc transmission

, or m ai ling and no the date of receipt. 73. Subs te- The surface onto which coatin

are applied

(or into which
tings are impregnated). 74

. Su 1cient density-Any number,

s pacing

, a combination of collectio

· system components, including vertical

we

s, horizontal collectors

and surface collectors

, neces

s ary to main

in emissi

o n and mig tion control

as determined

by measures

of pe rmance

as s et fo 7 . Sufficient extraction rate-A

r a te sufficient

to negati

e pressure

at all wellh

e ads

i n the collection
syste without c ausi

g air infiltration, includ

i ng any wellheads connected

to system

a result

of expansi

o n or excess

s urface emi ss ion

s , for

e life o f e blower. 76. Surface coating line-Same

as

a surfac

e coating unit

. 7 7

. Surface coating operation-Same

as industrial surface ng operation.

Title 10-DEPAKI'MENT

OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division 10-Air Conservation Commission Cbapter **~Air** Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods
and Air PoUution Control Regulations

for the Entire State
of Missouri ORDER

OF RULEMAKING By the authority vested

in the Missouri

Air Conservation Commission
under section 643

. 050

, RSMo 2000, the commission amends

a rule
as follows: 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required

is amended. A notice

of proposed rulemaking containing

the text of the proposed amendment

was published

in the Missouri Register

on February

15, 2011 (36 MoReg 784-792)

. No changes have been made

in the text of the proposed amendment,

so
it is not repr

i nted here

. This pro

posed amendment becomes effective thirty (30) day

s after publicati o n in the Code of State Re g ulations. SUMMARY

OF COMMENTS

: The Missouri Department

of Natural Resources'

Air Polluti

o n Control Program received

fiv
e (5) comments
from three

(3
) sources

on this propo

s ed amendment:

the Missouri Farm Bureau,

the Regulatory Envirornilental
Group

for Missouri,

and the St. Loui

s County Air Pollution Control Program. COMMENT

#1

: The

_ Missouri Farm Bureau (MFB) commented

that they oppose

the regulation

of greenhouse

g ases under the federal Clean Air Act and have expre

s sed con

c erns

to the U.S

. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),

the

. Missouri Congressional delegation,

and
to the Missouri

Air Conservation Commission

. Now that

E PA has finalized

its rules, Missouri

and other states with delegated permitting authority have two (2) choices: adopt the regulatory framework

put in place
by EPA
or allow EPA to issue

a Federal Implementation

Plan that gives

it the authority

to apply federal construction

and operating requirements

to large sources

of greenhouse
gases

in Mis

s ouri. The MFB cannot support either option becau

s e they

d
i sagree with the underlying premise. Though they cannot support either option, they would rather the state be the permitting authority

in the state rather than EPA

. RESPONSE

: The department's

Air Pollution Control Program continues

to monitor

the activities occurring
with the feder

a l regulations concerning greenhouse gases. However, until such time
as new rules or guidelines

are issued concerning

the tailoring rule, we will continue

to pursue compliance

with federal requirements

as they currently exist

. This will insure that the

s tate maintains

full authority over its permitting programs

and av o ids obligating
EPA
to exerci

s e its oversigh

t authority

to require

s tates

to meet the minimum federal s tandards

. No change was made

to the rule text

a s a result
of thi

s comment. COMMENT

#2: The Regulatory Environmental
Group
for Missouri (REGFORM) commented
durin

g the Regul ato ry Impact ReportJuly1,2011Vol.36No.13MissouriRegisterPage1697phaseofthisrulemaldngthattheyhadsubmittedsuggestedrulelanguagewhichwouldpreventthesegreenhousegaspermittingrulesfromtakingeffectinMissouriifthefederalrulesonwhichtheyarebasedarevoided,stayed,deferred,orotherwisemadeineffectivebyactionofthefederalcourts,Congressionalaction,orPresidentialOrder.REGFORMre-submitstheirrequest.TheDepartmentofNaturalResourcesandtheAirConservationCommissionstatedthatthedepartmentintendtoobservethestatutoryclauseroundinsection643.055,RSMo,andnotpursuegreenhousegaspermittinginMissouribeyondwhatisfederallyrequiredinthefutureandtheysupportthosestatements.Ifthecommissiondecidesagainstincludingself-voidinglanguageintheMissourirules,REGFORMencouragestheAirPollutionControlProgramtowatchfederaldevelopmentscloselyandminimizethelagbetweenfederalchangesandMissourirulesthatreflectthosechangesREGFORMrecommendsasavingsclausesothattheMissourirules,standingalone,donotinitiateconstructionoroperatingpermittingforgreenhousegassourcesiffederalstationarysourcegreenhousegas(GHG)rulesarenolongerineffectorarealtered.ThislanguagehastobecarefullycraftedsothatMissouriavoidsunintendedconsequences.·REGFORMsuggestedthatthefollowingtextbeaddedtotheendofthelanguageinsubsection(8)(A):Intheeventthatalloranyportionof40CFR52.21(b)(49)or(b)(50)(iv)-(v)aredeclaredoradjudgedtobeinvalidorstayedbyafederalcourtwhosejurisdictionincludesMissouri,orarewithdrawn,stayed,orotherwiserenderedofnoforceandeffectbytheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency,Congress,orPresidentialExecutiveOrder,suchactionshallrendertheterm"regulatedNSRpollutant"asappliedtogreenhousegasesinvalid,stayed,orotherwisewithoutforceandeffectforpurposesofthisrule,uponthedatesuchactionbecomesfinalandeffective.RESPONSE:Thecommentraisesaconcernaboutthelinkbetweenfederalandstateregulations.Whilestateregulationsmayincorporatebyreferenceorsubstantiallyrestateorrepeatfederalregulations,theimpactoffederalregulationsbeingstayed,vacated,withdrawn,etc.,isnotalwaysclear.Section643.055,RSMo,specificallyprohibitstheMissouriAirConservationCommissionfromestablishingstandardsandguidelinesthatarestricterorenforcedpriortowhatisrequiredbythefederalCleanAirAct.Thedepartmentintendstoimplementapplicablefederalrequirementsrelatedtogreenhousegases,anddoesnotintendtoproceedsoonerthanEPArequires.Intheeventthatfederalrequirementsrelatedtogreenhousegasesareinvalidatedorstayed,thedepartmentintendstoclarifyfortheregulatedcommunitywhatthedepartment'sexpectationsareofpermittees,whetherintheformofanemergencyruleamendment/rescission,anInAdditionnoticeorannotationpublishedintheMissouriRegisterandCodeofStateRegultltions,orotherwise.Thedepartment'sAirPollutionControlProgramcontinuestomonitortheactivitiesoccurringwiththefederalregulationsconcerninggreenhousegases.However,untilsuchtimeasfederalrequirementsrelatedtothetailoringrulearealtered,thedepartmentintendstocontinuepursuingcompliancewithfederalrequirementsastheycurrentlyexist.Nochangewasmadetotheruletextasaresultofthis comment.COMMENT#3:REGFORMcommentedthataspartofitstailoringproposal,thestateofUtahincludedaprovisionmakingitclearthatitdoesnotintendtoissueminorNewSourceReview(NSR)permitstocontrolGHGemissionsfurnewormodifiedGHGsourcesthatarebelowtailoringpreventionofsignificantdeterioration(PSD)thresholds.Missouri'spresentDeMinimisEmissionLeveltable,10CSR10-6.020(3)(A),doesnotlistgreenhousegasesthatarenototherwiseregulatedascriteriapollutantsorhazardousairpollutants.REGFORMsuggestedthatthefollowingtextbeaddedtotheendofthelanguageinsubsection(5)(A):Fornewormodifiedsourcesofgreenhousegases,asdefinedat40CFR52.2l(b)(49)(i),ademinimispermitshallnotberequiredasaresultofemissionincreasesingreenhousegasesonly.Deminimispermitsissuedasaresultofemissionincreasesinotherpollutantsshallnotcontainindependentcontrolrequirementsforgreenhousegasemissions.RESPONSE:Asreferencedabove,section643.055,RSMo,specificallyprohibitstheMissouriAirConservationCommissionfromestablishingstandardsandguidelinesthatarestricterorenforcedpriortowhatisrequiredbythefederalCleanAirAct.Thedepartment'sAirPollutionControlProgramdoesnotintendtoissueanypermitstocontrolgreenhousegaseslessthanthethresholdrequiredbyEPA.Nochangewasmadetotheruletextasaresultofthiscomment.COMMENT#4:REGFORMcommentedthatthefederaldefinitionof"RegulatedNSRPollutant"at40CFR52.21(b)(2)(50)(ii)statesthatanypollutantthatissubjecttoanystandardpromulgatedundersection111oftheActisaRegulatedNSRPollutant.This·provisionwasnotmodifiedbyEPA'stailoringrule,butitposesafutureproblem,andnotjustinMissouri.EPAplanstoissueNewSourcePerfunnanceStandards(Sec.111)forcertainGHGemissionsources.Oncethisoccurs,thefederaldefinitionofRegulatedNSRPollutantwouldsweepinallGHGemissions,withoutregardtotailoringthresholds.ThishasbeenbroughttoEPA'sattentionincommentsontheSeptember2,2010,GHGStateImplementationPlan(SIP)/FederalImplementationPlan(FIP)proposals.Unfortunately,itwasnotaddressedintheJune3,2010,tailoringruleincorporatedbyreferenceinMissouri'sdraftproposal.MissouricouldwaittoseewhetherEPAremediesthisoversightinitsfinalGHGSIP/FIPrule,whichisduetobeissuedlate2010.IfEPAdoesso,Missourimayneedtoincorporatetheupdatedreferenceinitsformaltailoringproposal,sincethedraftproposalonlyincludestheJune3,2010,tailoringprovisions,notanysubsequentchanges.IfEPAdoesnotremedythisprobleminthenearterm,Missouri-specificlanguagemaybeneededinitsfurmalproposal.RESPONSE:Thedepartment'sAirPollutionControlProgramcontinuestomonitortheactivitiesoccurringwiththefederalregulationsconcerninggreenhousegases.EPAisawareofthisissueandintendstoaddressthispriortopromulgatinganyNewSourcePerfurmanceStandardthatwouldincludestandardsforGHGs.EPAdidnotintendfurtheNewSourcePerformanceStandardtoaltertheapplicabilitylevelsofGHGssetfurthinthetailoringrule.Nochangewasmadetotheruletextasaresultofthiscomment.COMMENT#5:TheSt.LouisCountyAirPollutionControlProgramcommentedthattheysupporttheamendments.RESPONSE:TheMissouriDepartmentofNaturalResources'AirPollutionControlProgramappreciatesthesupport.Nochangewasmadetotheruletextasaresultofthiscomment.etO-DEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCDivision10--AirConservationCommissionChapte6--AirQualityStandardstDefmitions,andceMethodsandAirPoUutionRegu·onsfortheEntireStateof•AnoticeofprulemakingcontainingthetoftheproposedamendmentpublishedintheMissouriRegisterFebruary15,2011(36Reg793-800).Nochangeshavebeenmofthesedamendment,soitisnotreprintedhere.hispropoamendmentbecomeseffectivethirty(30)daysafterpuli·ation·theCodeofStateRegultltions.