alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**Certification**

 

In connection with the annual report of Lentuo International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)                 the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   April 30, 2013 |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |
|                        |   |
|                        |   | /s/   Jing Yang |
|                        | Name:  | Jing   Yang |
|                        | Title: | Chief   Executive Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7188

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES TERRY LITTLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CR-94-49)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Terry Little, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for production of transcripts at the Government's

expense. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Little, No. CR-94-49 (M.D.N.C. July 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TORULE 13a-14(b) ORRULE 15d-14(b)****OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND18 U.S.C. §1350**     The certification set forth below is being submitted inconnection with the **Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q**forthe quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the“Report”) for the purpose of complying withRule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and 18 U.S.C. §1350.     Dominic J. Pileggi, the Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth W.Fluke, the Chief Financial Officer, of Thomas & BettsCorporation (the “Corporation”), each certifies that,to the best of his knowledge:          1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and           2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Corporation.Dated this 7th day of August, 2006.     /s/ Dominic J. Pileggi           Dominic J. Pileggi *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*      /s/ Kenneth W. Fluke           Kenneth W. Fluke *Senior Vice President and* *Chief Financial Officer*
# CA2008258DE.01000501.xml

| 10.10.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 258/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 258/5

---

Berichtigung der Aufforderung zur Interessensbekundung im Hinblick auf die Ernennung eines/einer Vorsitzenden der Widerspruchskammer der Europäischen Agentur für chemische Stoffe — KOM/2008/10113

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 255 A vom 8. Oktober 2008
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 255 A vom 8. Oktober 2008

(2008/C 258 A/02)

Seite 3, Ziffer 2 der formalen Kriterien:

anstatt:

anstatt:

„..., davon mindestens drei Jahre im Bereich des Gemeinschaftsrechts und mindestens fünf Jahre im Rahmen einer juristischen oder ähnlichen Tätigkeit an einem internationalen und/oder nationalen Gericht und/oder bei einer der Widerspruchskammer vergleichbaren Beschwerdeeinrichtung.“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„..., davon mindestens fünf Jahre im Bereich des Gemeinschaftsrechts und mindestens drei Jahre im Rahmen einer juristischen oder ähnlichen Tätigkeit an einem internationalen und/oder nationalen Gericht und/oder bei einer der Widerspruchskammer vergleichbaren Beschwerdeeinrichtung.“

---
Hector Villegas Aguirre, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

United States of America, 

Defendant. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

MAY 1 9 2009 

Clerk, U.S. District and 

Bankruptcy Courts 

09 0922 

The plaintiff is a prisoner who has filed a pro se complaint and an application to proceed 

in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint dismissed for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction. 

Plaintiff has filed a civil action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 

2671 et seq. A civil action may be not be instituted under that Act 

unless the claimant shall have first presented the claim to the appropriate federal 

agency and his claim shall have been finally denied by the agency in writing and 

sent by certified or registered mail. The failure of an agency to make a final 

disposition of a claim within six months after it is filed shall, at the option of the 

claimant any time thereafter, be deemed a final denial of the claim for purposes of 

this section. 

28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). This court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over FTC A claims that 

have not been administratively exhausted as required by § 2675(a). See Jackson v. United States, 

730 F.2d 808, 809 (D.C. Cir. 1984) ("Such a[n administrative] claim is a mandatory 

jurisdictional prerequisite to a[n FTCA] suit against the United States."). Plaintiff has not 

demonstrated that he has exhausted his administrative remedies. Because plaintiff has not 
established that this court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action, the action will be 

dismissed without prejudice. 

A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. 

Date: "l1Ir 2rd1 District 

fA~- Judge 

- 2 -
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
 








































 
 

  Exhibit 4(l)(2)    
    




  


Protective Life Insurance Company  


PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY    /    P. O. BOX 2606    /    BIRMINGHAM,
ALABAMA 35202  


 A STOCK COMPANY                STATE OF DOMICILE:
TENNESSEE                (205-268-1000)








 

 RESIDUAL DEATH BENEFIT ENDORSEMENT  


The Company has issued this endorsement as a part of the policy to which it is attached ("the Policy"). There is no additional cost for this
endorsement. 


Notwithstanding
any provision in the Policy to the contrary, in the event this endorsement is in force and as of the date all of the following conditions are met ("RDB Effective
Date"): 



	(1)
	The
Policy has been in force at least twenty (20) Policy Years;



	(2)
	The
Insured's Attained Age is at least sixty-five (65);



	(3)
	Withdrawals
in an amount equal to the total premiums paid have been taken;



	(4)
	The
Policy Debt is at least ninety-nine (99) percent of the Cash Value; and



	(5)
	The
Policy Debt is greater than the Face Amount, 




Any
riders attached to the Policy shall terminate, any Variable Account Value shall be transferred to the Fixed Account and the Level Death Benefit or Increasing Death Benefit defined under the Policy
shall be deemed to mean the following: 



Level
Death Benefit—The Death Benefit shall be the greater of: 



	(a)
	The
Face Amount of insurance on the Insured's date of death;



	(b)
	a
specified percentage of the greater of the Policy Debt or Policy Value on the date of the Insured's death as indicated on the Table of Percentages shown
in the Death Benefit provision; or



	(c)
	The
Policy Debt on the Insured's date of death plus ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 




Increasing
Death Benefit—The Death Benefit shall be the greater of: 



	(a)
	the
Face Amount of insurance on the Insured's date of death plus the Policy Value on such date;



	(b)
	a
specified percentage of the greater of the Policy Debt or Policy Value on the Insured's date of death as indicated on the Table of Percentages shown in
the Death Benefit provision; or



	(c)
	The
Policy Debt on the Insured's date of death plus ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 





As
of the RDB Effective Date, the Company shall no longer allow any: 



	(a)
	Premium
payments;



	(b)
	Withdrawals;



	(c)
	Policy
Loans;



	(d)
	Face
Amount changes; or



	(e)
	Death
Benefit Option changes. 




In
addition, as of the RDB Effective Date, the Policy will not Lapse as of any Monthly Anniversary Day if and only if conditions (1) through (4) described above are met as of such Day. 


 Termination of Endorsement:    This endorsement shall terminate if the Policy terminates. 


Signed
for the Company as of the Policy Effective Date. 




  


Secretary 


1







 
THIS
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 


2











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4(l)(2)
(Reap. Dec. 8909)

Entry No. 1119.

#### W. M. Stone and Company *v.*United States

(Decided July 10, 1957)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, in the matter of the above entitled reappraisement, *573that at the time of exportation of the merchandise covered thereby there was no foreign, export or United States value.

> That cost of production is the proper basis of appraisement and that the invoice unit value plus packing represented said cost of production as defined in Sec. 402 (f), Tariff Act of 1930.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal may be ■ deemed submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the invoice unit value, plus packing.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 64968.

#### Shrager Brothers Company *v.*United States,

protests 326284-K, 58/14020, and 58/23279 (Pittsburgh).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58150.

protests 184508-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Fan Co. and National Carloading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays in chief value of brass, the same in all material respects as those involved in *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 34.2
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
  
    
    Servicing criterion 1122(d)(1)(iii) is applicable only with respect to the Companys
continuing obligation to act as, or locate a, successor servicer under the circumstances
referred to in certain transaction agreements. It is managements interpretation that the
Company has no other active back-up servicing responsibilities in regards to 1122(d)(1)(iii)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Furthermore, Managements Assertion of
Compliance indicates that there were no activities performed related to this criterion during
the year ended December 31, 2010 with respect to the Platform, because there were no
occurrences of events that would require the Company to perform such activities.
    
    Servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(iii) is applicable to the activities the Company performs
with respect to the Platform only as it relates to the Companys obligation to report
additions, removals or substitutions on reports to investors in accordance with the
transactions agreements.




---



#####
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Joseph T. Morris, the Chief Financial Officer of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. (the Registrant), certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
the Registrant;



(2) Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;



(3) Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;



(4) The
Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [Intentionally Omitted];



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|November 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Joseph T. MorrisJoseph T. Morris SunLink Health Systems,
Inc. Chief Financial Officer
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Pt. 209

# Pt. 213

# Pt. 214

# Pt. 215

# Pt. 217

# Pt. 218

# Pt. 219

# Pt. 220

# Pt. 221

# Pt. 222

# Pt. 223

# Pt. 224

# Pt. 225

# Pt. 227

# Pt. 228

# Pt. 229

# Pt. 230

# Pt. 231

# Pt. 232

# Pt. 233

# Pt. 234

# Pt. 235

# Pt. 236

# Pt. 237

# Pt. 238

# Pt. 239

# Pt. 240

# Pt. 241

# Pt. 242

# Pt. 243

# Pt. 270

# Pt. 271

# Pt. 272

# Pt. 299

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/11/03/2020-20388/texas-central-railroad-high-speed-rail-safety-standards
EXHIBIT 99.1
                         TO TSR INC. REPORT ON FORM 10Q
                                 AUGUST 31, 2002
   CERTIFICATION BY J.F. HUGHES PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, President of TSR, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
August 31, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") accompanying this certification fully
complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The foregoing
certification is incorporated solely for purposes of complying with the
provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be
used for any other purpose.

Dated:   October 2, 2002




                                            /s/ J.F. Hughes
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                J.F. Hughes, President
# C_2007230EN.01000301.xml

| 2.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/3

---

Call for proposals under the ‘Capacities’ work programme of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

(2007/C 230/04)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the ‘Capacities’ work programme of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call.

‘Capacities’ Specific Programme:

‘Capacities’ Specific Programme:

| — | Part: Activities of International Cooperation

  Call Identifier: FP7-INCO-2007-3 |
| --- | --- |

—

Part: Activities of International Cooperation

Part:

Call Identifier: FP7-INCO-2007-3

Call Identifier:

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2007) 2464 of 14 June 2007.

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2007) 2464 of 14 June 2007.

Information on the call budget, deadlines and modalities, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website:

http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance










Exhibit 10.8




September 25, 2007




MiMedx, Inc.

1234 Airport Road

Suite 105

Destin, Florida 32541




Re: Resignation as President and Amendment to Employment Agreement




Dear MiMedx, Inc.:



I hereby resign from my position as President of MiMedx, Inc. (the “Company”) in order to
accept the position of Executive Vice President of the Company, effective as of the date above.



Pursuant to Paragraph 15 of that certain Employment Agreement between myself and the Company
dated March 1, 2007, the Company and I hereby agree to amend Paragraph 1 of such Employment
Agreement to read in its entirety as follows:



1. Position and Duties. Executive shall be employed by the Company as Executive Vice
President, reporting to the Company’s Chairman of the Board. Executive agrees to devote sufficient
business time, energy, and skill to his duties at the Company. These duties shall include all
those duties customarily performed by an Executive Vice President and the Executive’s services
shall be performed primarily out of the Company’s Tampa office.




This amendment shall be effective as of the date set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Matthew J. Miller	 
	 	Matthew J. Miller 	 



	 	 	 
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	MiMedx, Inc.
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	By:  /s/ John C. Thomas, Jr.
	 	 
	 


	 	 
	Name: John C. Thomas, Jr.


Its: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**PACIFIC QUEST VENTURES CORP.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofPacific Quest Ventures Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Tay, Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company,certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to William Tay and will be retained by Pacific Quest Ventures Corp. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Dated: March 25, 2013

 

By: /s/ William Tay

William Tay

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
exv10w4






Exhibit 10.4




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the reference of our firm under the caption “Experts” and to the use of our report,
dated February 7, 2006, with respect to the unit value data of Federal Life Variable Annuity
Account A for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 included in the

Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-147464) and related
Prospectus of Federal Life Variable Annuity Account A for the registration of securities to be sold
under individual variable deferred annuity contracts with Federal Life Insurance Company (Mutual).



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 	 
	 	Ernst & Young LLP 	 
	 	 	 
	 



Chicago, Illinois

August 12, 2008
Before the Second Division,

March 31, 1944

No. 49303.

#### Protest 107980-K of Morris Shoenthal, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that the items in question are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218). In accordance therewith the protest was sustained to this extent.