23-1 June 2021

Chapter 23: Public Involvement and Agency Coordination

23.1 INTRODUCTION 

FRA developed the public and agency participation program for the Western Rail Yard 

Infrastructure Project in compliance with legislation and policies that guide compliance with the 

stakeholder involvement requirements of NEPA. 

A detailed description of the tools being used to engage stakeholders in this EIS process can be 

found in the Public and Agency Coordination Plan, (provided in Appendix P1), which is also 

posted on the project website at www.westernrailyardinfrastructure.com. This chapter presents an 

overview of the regulatory process and summarizes the agency and public outreach activities that 

have occurred to date for this EIS.

23.2 REGULATORY PROCESS

23.2.1 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT 

The overall NEPA process involves the public throughout the process and documents the 

decisions made in a NEPA document. Agencies are required to provide meaningful opportunities 

to include the public and other agencies in the NEPA process. The FRA has provided two key 

opportunities for input during the development of the EIS: Scoping and the Draft EIS and Draft 

Section 4(f) Evaluation.

• NOI. Publication of the NOI in the Federal Register formally announced FRA’s intent to 

prepare an EIS for a proposed action and initiates the environmental review process. FRA 

published an NOI to prepare an EIS for the Western Rail Yard Infrastructure Project in the 

Federal Register on June 15, 2020.

• Scoping. Scoping immediately followed the publication of the NOI and served as the initial 

step in the NEPA process where the public and agencies were provided an opportunity to 

review and comment on the scope of the EIS. FRA requested comments specifically on the

purpose and need, additional alternatives to be considered in the EIS, environmental issues 

of concern, and the methodologies for the environmental analysis. A Scoping Document was 

made available on July 1, 2020, on the Federal Docket system at Regulations.gov (Docket 

FRA-2020-0039) and on the Project website (www.westernrailyardinfrastructure.com). 

FRA conducted a virtual public scoping process. The scoping period was held from July 1 through 

July 31, 2020. FRA led the outreach activities with a scoping presentation made available on the 

project website. FRA also facilitated a virtual scoping meeting for local, State, and Federal 

agencies. All comments were reviewed and considered by FRA, and responses were provided in 

a Scoping Summary Report, which was posted to the Federal Docket and the project’s website in 

September 2020 (see Section 23.4 for more details). 
June 2021 23-2 

• DEIS. Following scoping, this DEIS was prepared, which incorporates comments received 

during scoping, as appropriate, and provides detailed technical analyses related to potential 

social, economic, and environmental impacts of the No Action and Preferred Alternatives. This 

DEIS identifies appropriate measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts of the Preferred 

Alternative consistent with the requirements of NEPA and other applicable regulations and 

requirements.

• Public Review of the DEIS. This is the second key opportunity for input on the NEPA process 

and the EIS. In accordance with NEPA, a public comment period for the DEIS of no less than 

45 days was established and the Notice of Availability of the DEIS was widely distributed. FRA 

will hold Public Hearings and any other project meetings virtually, and encourages submission 

of comments for the DEIS and other documents electronically. Public and interested agencies 

will have the opportunity to submit comments in writing, via the Docket system at 

Regulations.gov (Docket FRA-2020-0039), email, or U.S. mail to FRA.

• Combined FEIS/ROD. After the close of the public comment period on the DEIS, FRA intends 

to issue a combined FEIS/ROD in accordance with 23 USC §139(n)(2) and 49 USC §304a, 

which directs the lead agency, to the maximum extent practicable, to expeditiously develop a 

single document combining the FEIS and ROD unless the following conditions exist:

- The FEIS makes substantial changes to the Preferred Alternative that are relevant to 

environmental or safety concerns; or

- There are significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental 

concerns and that potentially affect the Preferred Alternative or the impacts of Preferred 

Alternative. 

The FEIS/ROD will include a summary of, and response to, all appropriate comments made on 

the DEIS during the public comment period and address any necessary revisions to the DEIS to 

address the comments. The ROD will describe any commitments for mitigating potential social, 

economic, and environmental impacts. 

23.2.2 SECTION 106 CONSULTATION

Section 106 of the NHPA requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their 

undertakings on historic properties that are listed in or meet the eligibility criteria for listing in the 

NRHP and afford the ACHP a reasonable opportunity to comment. Section 106 also requires that 

agency officials work with NYSHPO to identify parties to participate in the Section 106 process 

(Consulting Parties). Consulting parties may include local governments, Federally recognized 

Indian tribes, and individuals and organizations with a demonstrated interest in the project due to 

the nature of their legal or economic relationship to the project or affected historic properties, or 

their concern with the project’s effects on historic properties. 

23.2.3 SECTION 4(F) CONSULTATION

Section 4(f) prohibits operating administrations of USDOT from approving any transportation 

program or project that requires the use of any publicly owned parkland, recreation area, or wildlife 

and waterfowl refuge; or any land from a publicly or privately owned historic site of national, state, 

or local significance (collectively, Section 4(f) resources), unless (1) the agency determines that 

the use of the property will have a de minimis impact; or (2) there is no feasible and prudent 

avoidance alternative to the use of the land, and the action includes all possible planning to 

minimize harm to the Section 4(f) resource. 

Section 4(f) requires that FRA must coordinate with the DOI, and if appropriate, with the U.S. 

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture 

(USDA), and the appropriate official(s) with jurisdiction over the Section 4(f) resource, prior to 

approving the use of a Section 4(f) property. 
Chapter 23: Public Involvement and Agency Coordination

23-3 June 2021

Section 4(f) requires that public notice and an opportunity for public review and comment must be 

provided on the Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation. This requirement can be satisfied in conjunction with 

other public involvement procedures, such as the comment period provided on an EIS prepared 

in accordance with NEPA. For this Project, FRA is providing the public an opportunity to review 

and comment on the Draft EIS and Draft Section 4(f) evaluation for the Preferred Alternative

simultaneously during the NEPA public review period. FRA would issue a Section 4(f) 

determination prior to or in conjunction with its EIS ROD.

23.2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE OUTREACH

EO 12898 requires consideration of whether a proposed action would disproportionately affect 

minority or low-income groups (59 Federal Register 7629). EO 12898 also requires Federal 

agencies to ensure public participation from communities with substantial minority or low-income 

populations. Each Federal agency has developed a strategy to address environmental justice, 

with the CEQ responsible for oversight and coordination. The environmental justice analysis for 

the Preferred Alternative follows the guidance and methodologies recommended in CEQ’s 

Environmental Justice Guidelines under the NEPA (December 1997); the USDOT’s Final Order 

5610.2(a) on Environmental Justice (April 1997 and updated May 2012); the Environmental 

Justice Policy Guidance for Federal Transit Administration Recipients, FTA C 4703.1; and relevant 

guidance from the State of New York. 

23.2.5 OTHER PERMITS AND APPROVALS 

Implementation and construction of the Preferred Alternative is subject to a number of state and 

local permits and approvals in addition to NEPA. The regulatory requirements related to the 

Preferred Alternative‘s construction and operations are discussed in detail in the preceding 

technical chapters. FRA anticipates the following permits and approvals would be required to 

implement the Preferred Alternative (see Table 23-1). 
June 2021 23-4 

Table 23-1

Permits and Approvals Required for the Preferred Alternative

State of New York

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 

Soil Erosion Control 

SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Construction Activity

New York State Department of State

Coastal Zone Consistency Determination

Local

New York City Department of City Planning 

New York City Department of City Planning Coastal Zone Consistency Determination

Compliance with Environmental Construction Measures per the Restrictive Declaration

New York City Department of Buildings

New Building Permit 

New York City Department of Buildings/City of New York Fire Department 

Fuel Storage 

Fire Protection (Wet System) 

City of New York Fire Department

Fire Alarm and Fire Suppression (FM-200) 

Life Safety / Egress 

Radio 

New York City Department of Environmental Protection 

Site Connection – for water drainage and runoff 

Generators (for emissions) 

Tunneling Permit

New York City Department of Parks and Recreation 

Proximity to High Line

New York City Department of Transportation

Division of Bridges

Department of Transportation – Sidewalks 

Department of Transportation – Underground Vaults if necessary 

Department of Transportation – Revocable Consents if necessary 

OCMC

Con Edison

Electrical and Gas Service

New York City Mayor's Office of Environmental Remediation

Remedial Investigative Report (RIR) 

RAP

Waste Characterization 

Noise RAP 

LIRR – for Transit areas for compliance with NYS Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code

Amtrak for proximity to existing structures

Friends of the High Line
Chapter 23: Public Involvement and Agency Coordination

23-5 June 2021

23.3 AGENCY COORDINATION

23.3.1 LIST OF AGENCIES, ROLES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Lead agencies include the USDOT, or any operating administration thereof designated by the 

Secretary, and any project sponsor that is a state or local governmental entity receiving Federal 

funds for the purpose of preparing any environmental document under NEPA (23 U.S.C. § 

139[a][1]). FRA is serving as Federal lead agency for this EIS. Lead agencies are responsible for 

providing an opportunity for public, cooperating, and participating agency involvement. It is the 

responsibility of the lead agencies to identify, invite, and involve cooperating and participating 

agencies. 

“Cooperating agencies” are Federal agencies other than the lead Federal agency that have 

jurisdiction by law, or special expertise with respect to a particular environmental issue involved in 

a particular project (40 CFR 1501.5). Cooperating agencies may also be state or local agencies 

of similar qualifications or Indian tribal governments (40 CFR 1508.5), if agreed upon by the lead 

agencies. While no cooperating agencies have been identified for this project, CEQ regulations 

(40 CFR § 1501.6) state that an agency may request the lead agency to designate it a cooperating 

agency.

“Participating agencies” are those Federal, state, or local agencies or Federally recognized tribal 

governmental organizations with an interest in the Preferred Alternative. The standard for 

participating agency status is more encompassing than the standard for cooperating agency 

status. The role of participating agencies is to:

• Provide input on defining the purpose and need for the Preferred Alternative, the range of 

alternatives to be considered, and the methodologies and level of detail required in the 

alternatives analysis;

• Participate in coordination meetings and joint field reviews, as appropriate;

• As requested by FRA, provide timely review and comments on pre-draft or pre-final 

environmental documents; and

• Provide timely comments on unresolved issues.

Table 23-2 lists FRA as the lead agency and the agencies that FRA invited to serve as 

participating agencies, with their applicable area of jurisdiction or expertise. FRA continues to 

consult with Participating Agencies throughout the NEPA process to update them on the status of 

the EIS development and discuss areas of concern.
June 2021 23-6 

Table 23-2 

Lead and Invited Participating Agencies

Agency Role

Accepted or 

Declined 

Invitation Responsibilities

[Lead] Federal Railroad 

Administration (FRA)

Federal Lead 

Agency Accepted

Manage environmental review process; 

prepare EIS and decision document; 

provide opportunity for public and 

agency involvement; arbitrate and 

resolve issues

[Federal] Federal Transit 

Administration (FTA)

Participating 

Agency Accepted Consultation related to NEPA

[Federal] U.S. Department 

of Interior (USDOI)

Participating 

Agency Accepted

Consultation related to Section 4(f) of 

the U.S. Department of Transportation 

Act

[Federal] U.S. 

Environmental Protection 

Agency (USEPA)

Participating 

Agency Accepted Consultation related to NEPA; Section 

309, Clean Air Act

[Federal] Federal 

Emergency Management 

Agency (FEMA), Federal 

Region II

Participating 

Agency Declined Consultation related to resilience and 

floodplain issues

[Federal] Bureau of Indian 

Affairs Eastern Region

Participating 

Agency Declined

[Federal] U.S. Geological 

Survey

Participating 

Agency Declined

[Federal] U.S. Department 

of Homeland Security 

(DHS)

Participating 

Agency Accepted Consultation related to security

[Federal] Advisory Council 

on Historic Preservation 

(ACHP) 

Participating 

Agency, 

possible 

Section 106 

Consulting 

Party

Accepted

Consultation related to Section 106 of 

the National Historic Preservation Act; 

possible participation in Section 106 

process; promulgates Section 106 

regulations and guidance

[State / Regional / Local]

Metropolitan 

Transportation Authority 

(MTA)

Participating 

Agency Accepted Consultation

[State / Regional / Local]

MTA Long Island Rail 

Road

Participating 

Agency Accepted Consultation

[State / Regional / Local]

New York State 

Department of 

Environmental 

Conservation, Region 2 

(NYSDEC)

Participating 

Agency Accepted Consultation and various reviews

[State / Regional / Local]

New York State 

Department of State 

(NYSDOS)

Participating 

Agency Declined Coastal zone consistency review
Chapter 23: Public Involvement and Agency Coordination

23-7 June 2021

Table 23-2 (cont’d)

Lead and Invited Participating Agencies

Agency Role

Accepted or 

Declined 

Invitation Responsibilities

[State / Regional / Local] 

New York State Historic 

Preservation Office 

(NYSHPO) 

Participating 

Agency; 

Section 106 

Consulting 

Party

Accepted Concurrence under Section 106, 

National Historic Preservation Act

[State / Regional / Local]

New York State 

Department of 

Transportation (NYSDOT)

Participating 

Agency Accepted

Consultation related to potential impacts 

to State roadways and associated 

mitigation in New York City

[State / Regional / Local]

New York City Department 

of City Planning 

(NYCDCP)

Participating 

Agency Accepted

Consultation related to potential 

environmental impacts and associated 

mitigation in New York City, and coastal 

zone consistency review

[State / Regional / Local]

New York City Department 

of Environmental 

Protection (NYCDEP)

Participating 

Agency Accepted Consultation related to various potential 

environmental impacts in New York City

[State / Regional / Local] 

New York City Landmarks 

Preservation Commission 

(NYCLPC)

Participating 

Agency; 

Section 106 

Consulting 

Party

Accepted

Consultation related to Cultural 

Resource (historic structure and/or 

archaeological resource) impacts in New 

York City

[State / Regional / Local]

New York City Department 

of Transportation 

(NYCDOT)

Participating 

Agency Accepted

Consultation related to potential 

transportation system impacts and 

associated mitigation in New York City

[State / Regional / Local] 

New York City Department 

of Parks and Recreation 

(NYC Parks) 

Participating 

Agency; 

Section 106 

Consulting 

Party

Accepted

Consultation related to potential impacts 

to Parklands, historic resources, and 

open spaces, and associated mitigation 

in New York City; Section 4(f) 

consultation 

[State / Regional / Local] 

New York City Mayor’s’ 

Office of Environmental 

Coordination (NYCMOEC)

Participating 

Agency Accepted

Consultation related to potential 

environmental impacts and associated 

mitigation in New York City; MOEC will 

coordinate all of the comments on 

environmental review documents for the 

Project from all NYC agencies

Note: Any Federal agency that is invited by the lead agency to participate in the environmental review 

process for a project shall be designated as a participating agency by the lead agency unless it declines in 

writing; other agencies must accept in writing.
June 2021 23-8 

FRA collaborated with the participating agencies in defining the purpose and need, range of 

reasonable alternatives to be examined in the EIS, and methodologies for documenting 

environmental conditions, and assessing impacts. While consensus is not required in the 

development of impact assessment methodologies, FRA considered the views of the agencies 

with relevant interests before making a decision on a particular methodology. FRA hosted agency 

coordination meetings to gather feedback from the agencies on the Preferred Alternative and 

proposed methodologies on July 21, 2020, and October 15, 2020, respectively. FRA notified the 

participating agencies of the availability of the key environmental review documents (e.g., Scoping 

Document, Scoping Summary Report, and EIS) and provided comment opportunities.

23.3.2 SECTION 106 CONSULTATION

FRA is conducting consultation and public involvement required under Section 106 of the NHPA 

concurrently with the NEPA process (36 CFR 800.8). On July 3, 2020, FRA initiated consultation 

with the NYSHPO. On July 30, 2020, FRA wrote to Federally recognized tribal organizations to 

invite them to participate as Consulting Parties. FRA invited public agencies, preservation groups, 

and other stakeholders to participate as Consulting Parties, in August 2020. All correspondence 

related to Section 106 is presented in Appendix F1. 

In accordance with Section 106 regulations (36 CFR § 800.2), FRA has consulted with the 

NYSHPO to identify other Consulting Parties to participate in the Section 106 process. As set forth 

in the regulations, Consulting Parties for an undertaking can include the following:

• Federally recognized Indian tribes

• Representatives of local governments with jurisdiction over the area where the undertaking 

may occur;

• The applicant for Federal assistance, permits, licenses, and approvals; and

• Additional consulting parties: certain individuals and organizations with a demonstrated 

interest in the undertaking due to their legal or economic relation to the undertaking or affected 

properties or their concern with the undertaking’s effects on historic properties.

The entities FRA invited to participate as Consulting Parties in the Section 106 review process for 

the undertaking are as follows:

• NYSHPO

• Amtrak

• ACHP

• Delaware Nation

• Delaware Tribe

• Shinnecock Indian Nation

• Stockbridge-Munsee Community of Mohican Indians

• Eastern Delaware Nations (not federally recognized)

• Lenape Nation of Pennsylvania (not federally recognized)

• New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission

• Hudson River Park Trust

• Friends of the High Line

• Society for Industrial Archaeology

• Professional Archaeologists of New York City

• Anthracite Railroads Historical Society
Chapter 23: Public Involvement and Agency Coordination

23-9 June 2021

• Erie Lackawanna Railroad Historical Society

• National Railway Historical Society, Inc. 

• Railway and Locomotive Historical Society, Inc. 

In addition, FRA subsequently provided information regarding the Preferred Alternative’s

proposed APE, identification of historic properties, assessment of the Preferred Alternative’s

potential effects on historic properties, and measures proposed to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate 

adverse effects to historic properties to Consulting Parties.

FRA provided opportunities for public involvement in Section 106 concurrent with the NEPA public 

involvement, including the scoping period and DEIS public outreach. In addition, this EIS includes 

detailed information on FRA’s efforts to comply with Section 106 for the Preferred Alternative 

(including the identification of and assessment of effects to historic properties) in Chapter 9, 

“Cultural Resources.” Circulation of this EIS for public review/comment helps satisfy FRA’s public 

involvement obligations under Section 106.

23.3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE OUTREACH

FRA has held virtual public outreach meetings throughout development of the EIS documentation, 

including at key project milestones. Meeting materials have been translated into Spanish, which 

is the predominant language other than English that residents of the Study Area speak at home.

FRA posted on the project website a narrated scoping presentation in Spanish and English.

FRA is soliciting public comments on this DEIS through the end of the 45-day comment period. 

FRA published advertisements in local newspapers and online media outlets servicing the project 

area and distributed the bilingual public notice to locally based organizations, including the Hudson 

Yards Corporation.

23.4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

FRA conducted a virtual public scoping process. FRA also held other meetings virtually, including 

Section 106 Consulting Party meetings, and encouraged submission of scoping comments and 

other documents electronically. As part of the virtual public scoping process, FRA developed and 

posted a narrated scoping presentation, in both English and Spanish. These scoping 

presentations were available on the Project website on July 1, 2020, and will remain on the project 

website for the duration of the EIS process. 

During preparation of this DEIS, FRA has informed and solicited feedback from the public; 

encouraged open discussion of details and issues on the Preferred Alternative; and provided 

opportunities for comments and questions. FRA used the Federal Docket (Regulations.gov, 

Docket No. FRA-2020-0039), project website (www.westernrailyardinfrastructure.com), meeting 

flyers, and email notices to publicize the availability of documents and all public meetings. The 

flyers were in English and Spanish, and were mailed or emailed to the project mailing list. FRA 

also distributed flyers to libraries and repositories, listed in Table 23-3. Since the availability of 

materials for public review at these repositories is uncertain, as an accommodation, FRA will send, 

free of charge, a copy of the DEIS Executive Summary in English or Spanish to anyone that 

requests it (call 929-229-5220, or email wryproject@dot.gov). 
June 2021 23-10

Table 23-3 

Project Document Repositories 

Organization Address City, State Phone

Jack Brause Library* 11 West 42nd Street, #510 New York, NY (212) 992-3627

Manhattan Community Board 4** 330 West 42nd Street, 26th Floor New York, NY (212) 736-4536

Manhattan Community Board 5** 450 Fashion Avenue, #2109 New York, NY (212)-465-0907

Mid-Manhattan Library*,+ 455 Fifth Avenue New York, NY (212) 340-0863

NYPL Columbus Branch Library*,+ 742 Tenth Avenue New York, NY (212) 586-5098

Notes: 

Since the availability of materials for public review at these repositories is uncertain, as an accommodation, 

FRA will send a copy of the DEIS Executive Summary in English or Spanish to anyone that requests it free 

of charge (call 929-229-5220, or email wryproject@dot.gov). 

* Libraries may not yet be open to visitors during the DEIS comment period. Please call the library you 

wish to visit to obtain current operating hours and accessibility information for public review of the DEIS 

and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation. 

** The Community Board offices have the DEIS and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation available for public review 

in their offices, by appointment only. Call in advance for hours and to schedule a visit to review these 

materials.

+ The Mid-Manhattan Library and NYPL Columbus Branch Library were not fully open during the scoping 

period.

Advertisements for the public Scoping Notice were published in local newspapers and online 

media outlets serving the project area, including English language newspapers/online media and 

Spanish language newspapers (with Spanish language advertisements). Table 23-4 lists the 

newspapers and publication dates of the project Scoping Notices. Appendix P2 includes copies 

of the advertisements FRA published in newspapers and online media outlets, and their 

corresponding Affidavits of Publication. In addition to these traditional means of outreach and 

notification, FRA distributed the bi-lingual public Scoping Notice to locally based organizations, 

including the Hudson Yards Corporation, Hudson Yards Hell's Kitchen Alliance, and Midtown 

South Community Council to assist with publicizing the public scoping process and associated 

comment period. 

Table 23-4 

Public Scoping Notice Publications 

Newspaper / Online Media Publication Date

AMNY / Metro (merged with The Villager)

6/22/2020—Monday e-newsletter

6/23/2020—Tuesday e-newsletter

6/25/2020—Thursday Print Edition

6/26/2020—Friday e-newsletter

Chelsea / Clinton News 6/24/2020—Wednesday e-blast

6/25/2020—Thursday Print Edition

Midtown Patch 6/22/2020 through 6/28/2020—Online

El Diario Nueva York – Spanish language paper 6/25/2020—Thursday Print Edition

El Especialisto NYC – Spanish language paper 6/26/2020—Friday Print Edition
Chapter 23: Public Involvement and Agency Coordination

23-11 June 2021

23.4.1 PUBLIC SCOPING PROCESS

The analysis of website metrics, covering the period from the publication of the NOI on June 15, 

2020 (when the website was activated) through the end of the public scoping period (on July 31, 

2020), includes 1,077 unique website page views, 126 and 18 viewings of the scoping 

presentation video for English and Spanish, respectively. FRA received a total of seven comment 

submissions (via letter, email, and the Federal Docket system) on the Scoping Document. FRA 

prepared a Scoping Summary Report, which is available for review on the project’s website 

(www.westernrailyardinfrastructure.com) and on the Federal Docket system, which summarizes 

and responds to the substantive comments received during the scoping comment period, and 

includes the full text of all comments received.

23.4.2 PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT ON DEIS 

Following scoping, FRA prepared this DEIS, which incorporates comments received during 

scoping, as appropriate, and provides detailed technical analyses related to potential social, 

economic, and environmental impacts of the Preferred Alternative. FRA is soliciting public 

comments on this DEIS through the end of the comment period. FRA will hold a project hearing

virtually, and encourages submission of comments for the project and other documents 

electronically. Detailed information regarding the public hearing and the various ways to comments 

on the DEIS are posted on the project website at www.westernrailyardinfrastructure.com.

This DEIS is available on the Federal Docket system (Regulations.gov, Docket No. FRA-2020-

0039), the project website at www.westernrailyardinfrastructure.com, and at the local repositories 

(libraries and other publicly accessible locations) listed on the project website.

The public comment period will be open for a minimum of 45 days after the publication of the 

DEIS, as specified in the Notice of Availability for the DEIS. The public and other interested parties 

are encouraged to comment by the following methods:

• going online to www.regulations.gov, and using Docket Number FRA-2020-0039;

• leaving a message at the following phone number exclusive to the project: (929) 229-5220; or 

• sending written comments by mail to the following address: Western Rail Yard Infrastructure 

Project, c/o FHI Studio, 416 Asylum Street, Hartford, CT 06103.

23.5 FRA CONTACT 

For further information contact:

Ms. Andrea Poole

Environmental Protection Specialist

Office of Railroad Policy and Development

USDOT Federal Railroad Administration

wryproject@dot.gov

