alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w7






Exhibit 10.7




DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

60 WALL STREET

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10005




July 16, 2008




Wellman, Inc.

1041 521 Corporate Center Drive

Fort Mill, South Carolina 29715

Attention: Chief Financial Officer

and Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer




Re: Wellman, Inc. Credit Agreement dated as of February 27, 2008




     Reference is hereby made to that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2008, by
and among Wellman, Inc. (the “Funds Administrator”) and the other Borrowers party thereto,
as debtors and debtors in possession, as Borrowers, the Lenders from time to time party thereto,
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Administrative Agent (in such capacity, the
“Administrative Agent”) and Collateral Agent, and the other agents signatory thereto (as
amended, restated, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit
Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings assigned to such terms in the Credit Agreement.



     The undersigned Administrative Agent, on behalf of the Majority Lenders, hereby consents to
the Funds Administrator’s request that the Lenders waive compliance with the minimum EBITDA
requirement for June 2008 set forth in Section 8.1(a) of the Credit Agreement be for the period
from July 16, 2008 through August 4, 2008. Except as expressly provided herein with respect to
Section 8.1 (a) of the Credit Agreement, (i) this letter shall not be construed as a consent,
waiver or other modification with respect to any term, condition, or any other provision of the
Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document, and each of the Loan Documents shall remain in full
force and effect, and (ii) neither this letter, nor any other communication between the
Administrative Agent and the Funds Administrator or any other Borrower shall be deemed to be a
waiver, modification, or release of any Default or Event of Default, whether such Default or Event
of Default arose or arises before, on or after the date hereof and whether or not known to the
Administrative Agent



[signature page follows]




 









 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY	 	 
	 	 	AMERICAS, as Administrative Agent	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Dusan Lazarov
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Vice President	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Keith C. Braun	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Managing Director	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	Acknowledged and agreed as of	 	 
	This 18 day of July, 2008	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	WELLMAN, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Keith R. Phillips
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Chief Financial Officer	 	 






Signature Page to Waiver
No. 62009.

#### Aero Sea Shipping Corporation *v.*United States

protest 315442-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
# C_2008241EN.01002702.xml

| 20.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/27

---

Corrigendum to the invitation to tender issued by Portugal under Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 in the context of the international public tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services for the route Lisbon-Vila Real-Bragança-Vila Real-Lisbon — P-Lisbon: Operation of scheduled air services

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 219 of 28 August 2008
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 219 of 28 August 2008

(2008/C 241/13)

On page 33, point 11, ‘Validity of invitation to tender’:

for:

‘... the validity of this invitation to tender is subject to the condition that no Community air carrier eligible to operate the service in question submits by 2 December 2008 an application to operate the routes in question from 14 August 2007, in accordance with the public service obligation imposed, without receiving any financial compensation.’,

read:

‘... the validity of this invitation to tender is subject to the condition that no Community air carrier eligible to operate the service in question submits by 2 December 2008 an application to operate the routes in question, in accordance with the public service obligation imposed, without receiving any financial compensation.’

---
# C_2007199EN.01005401.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/54

---

Action brought on 3 July 2007 — Dubus and Leveque v Commission

(Case F-66/07)

(2007/C 199/104)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Charles Dubus (Kraainem, Belgium) and Jean Leveque (Wattignies La Victoire, France) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decisions taken not to include the applicants' names in the list of those to be promoted in the 2006 promotion exercise, more particularly promoting Mr Dubus from C*2 to C*3 and Mr Leveque from B*7 to B*8, and, consequently, the decision not to promote them, as published in the Administrative Notice No 55-2006 of 17 November 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions taken not to include the applicants' names in the list of those to be promoted in the 2006 promotion exercise, more particularly promoting Mr Dubus from C*2 to C*3 and Mr Leveque from B*7 to B*8, and, consequently, the decision not to promote them, as published in the Administrative Notice No 55-2006 of 17 November 2006;

| — | order the defendant to pay, as damages for non-pecuniary and pecuniary loss and for the prejudice to the applicants' respective careers, the sum of EUR 25 000, subject to increase and/or decrease in the course of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay, as damages for non-pecuniary and pecuniary loss and for the prejudice to the applicants' respective careers, the sum of EUR 25 000, subject to increase and/or decrease in the course of the proceedings;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants rely on very similar pleas in law to those relied on in Case F-58/07, notice of which is published in the present issue of the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
No. 65663.

#### Catz American Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 282547-K, 282549-K, and 282562-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 18 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with GM on June 23, 2011 FROM: Don Kopinski TO: Docket EPA- HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a phone meeting held on June 23 , 2011 b etween GM and EPA staff. The following people attended : GM : Steve Fornetti EPA: Angela Cullen, Chris Nevers , Chuck Moulis, By ron Bunker, Cle Jackson, Don Kopinski The discussion focused on loose engine and incomplete vehicle requirements for the HD GHG program .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Sara E. Siegler,

Plaintiff

 v.

The Ohio State University,

Defendant

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:11-cv-170

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION

On June 1, 2012, the Court entered an order denying without prejudice

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to appeal this action in forma pauperis (Doc. 157), on

grounds that she had failed to supply the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1)

stating the nature of the appeal.

Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for partial reconsideration of this

order (Doc. 158). She states:

This Court erred in denying Siegler leave to appeal in forma pauperis

because the filing of the appeal notice, or Document 150, invokes

appellate jurisdiction, and thus, this Court had no authority to deny

Document 153. Pursuant to Hagg v. United States, the filing of a

notice of appeal functions to transfer jurisdiction to the appellate

court, and under United States v. Garcia-Robles, a district court is

divested of jurisdiction via the filing of a notice of appeal until the case

is remanded by the Court of Appeals.

(Doc. 158 at 3, citations omitted.) The Court observes that, under Plaintiff’s

reasoning, the Court accordingly had no jurisdiction to grant her motion, either. 

Case: 2:11-cv-00170-MRA Doc #: 159 Filed: 07/05/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2

For that matter, it would lack jurisdiction to grant this one. Nevertheless, the trial

court is expressly charged with examining, with the assistance of the plaintiff’s

affidavit, whether or not an appeal is “taken in good faith”. 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3). 

It therefore has jurisdiction to undertake this statutory duty. See McGore v.

Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610 (6th Cir. 1997).

 Plaintiff has set forth no basis for the Court to reconsider its earlier denial of

her motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 157), and her motion for

reconsideration (Doc. 158) is accordingly DENIED. However, the court’s denial, as

it stated, was without prejudice. Plaintiff was expressly authorized to refile her

motion, accompanied by an affidavit which “shall state the nature of the action,

defense, or appeal and affiant’s belief that the person is entitled to redress.” 28

U.S.C. §1915(a)(1). 

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00170-MRA Doc #: 159 Filed: 07/05/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Non-Executive Director Compensation Summary Sheet



 Exhibit 10.8 
 Summary Sheet 
 Compensation for Non-Executive Directors of News Corporation 
 (Effective as of July 1, 2008) 
 Summary of compensation amounts 
 Cash (annual amount in US$) 

	1.	Cash Retainer - $100,000 

  

	2.	Committee Member Retainer 

 Audit - $16,000 
 Compensation - $11,000 
 Nominating/Corporate
Governance $11,000 
  

	3.	Committee Chair Retainer: 

 Audit - $27,000 
 Compensation - $16,000 
 Nominating/Corporate
Governance - $16,000 
  

	4.	Deferred Stock Retainer - $120,000 value 

 The annual
retainer paid to non-executive directors is partly paid in cash and partly paid in deferred stock units for a total amount of $220,000 per year. 
 Cash 
  

	 	•	 	 Committee members of the Board will receive a further retainer. The chairman of a committee will receive an additional retainer. 


  

	 	•	 	 There is no “per meeting attended” compensation. 


  

	 	•	 	 Non-executive directors who join or leave the board will receive a partial payment of the cash portion of the retainer. 


 Deferred Stock Units 
  

	 	•	 	 Non-executive directors are credited with the number of shares of News Corporation Class A Common Stock equal to $120,000 per year.



  

	 	•	 	 The value of the shares will be paid to non-executive directors in cash on the fifth anniversary date of when it was credited to the directors’ account, unless
such director leaves the board before such date. 


  

	 	•	 	 Upon a non-executive director’s end of service on the Board, such director will be paid the value of the shares credited to his or her account at the market
value of such shares as of the date of the director’s end of service.
The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-4176

___________

Michael Eugene Johnson, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the * Eastern District of Missouri.

Department of the Interior, James H. *

Jacobs, an individual; United States * [UNPUBLISHED]

of America, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: January 14, 1998

 Filed: March 2, 1998

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Eugene Johnson appeals from the district court&s order substituting the 1

United States as party-defendant, granting defendants& motion for summary judgment

on his Title VII claim based on a racially hostile work environment, and granting their

motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction his Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) claims.
-2-

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties& submissions on appeal, we

conclude that the district court properly substituted the United States and granted

defendants summary judgment, and we affirm as to those issues on the basis of the

district court&s thorough opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also conclude that the

dismissal of Johnson&s FTCA claims was proper. Although the district court correctly

held that Johnson had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies on these claims, we

affirm the dismissal because the claims are barred by sovereign immunity. See Forrest

City Mach. Works, Inc. v. United States, 953 F.2d 1086, 1087 & n.3 (8th Cir. 1992);

28 U.S.C. § 2680(h) (FTCA does not apply to any claim “arising out of” libel or

slander); Moessmer v. United States, 760 F.2d 236, 237-38 (8th Cir. 1985)

(dissemination-of-false-information/defamation claim falls within libel and slander

exception to FTCA waiver of sovereign immunity).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Before the First Division,

January 22, 1942

No. 46864.

#### Protest 780374-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel whistling balloons, rubber balloons, noisemakers, and cigarette whistles, composed in part of bamboo, were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 409 as claimed. Abstracts 40493 and 39509 followed.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Asistencia GRATIS con el impuesto VITA, volunteer income tax assistance, tax counseling for the elderly, celebrating 30 years of community service

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Asistencia GRATIS con el impuesto VITA, volunteer income tax assistance, tax counseling for the elderly, celebrating 30 years of community service 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Publication ; no. 729 SP; Publication (United States. Internal Revenue Service) ; 729 SP. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 29 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  043052302.jpg; 043052302.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v WASH M. WILKERSON, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

16 USCMA 525, 37 CMR 145

No. 19,882

February 17, 1967

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Captain Frank J. Martin, Jr.,*and *Captain John C. Holzer*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused..

*Colonel Peter S. Wondolowski, Lieutenant Colonel David Rarick,*and *Captain Harvey L. Anderson*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The accused .was found guilty, of aggravated assault, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 128, 10 USC § 928, and communication of a threat in violation of Code, supra, Article 134, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and. allowances, and confinement at hard labor for five years. Intermediate appellate authorities have affirmed, with a reduction in the period of adjudged confinement. Accused’s petition for review, among, other assignments, contends the law officer erred prejudicially in instructing the court on the issue of self-defense. The Government concedes such to be the case and prays for remand of the record, to the board of review.

The law officer, ■ in advising the court regarding self-defense, declared not only that the accused must have honestly believed himself to be in danger of death or grievous bodily harm from his victim, but also required it to find “the evidence tended to show” such to be the case. This was patently erroneous, for an accused need only be in apparent, not actual, danger in order to resort to his right of self-defense. United States v Burse, 16 USCMA 62, 36 CMR 218, and cases cited therein. The Government’s concession is, accordingly, correct.

The petition for review is granted, and the findings of guilty of Charge I *526and its specification are set aside. The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. The board may reassess the sentence on the basis of the threat charge or order a rehearing on the assault count and the penalty.
• ST/\TE 0F I\i E\ft4~E’jI\ Brian Sandoval, Governor fldep Department of Conservation & Natural Resources Leo M. Drozdoff, PE., Director

NEVADA DIVI5ION0F

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Colleen Crpps. Ph.D., Adm’nistrator

protecting the future for generotsons

November 7, 2014

Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

Mail Code ORA-1

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94 105-3901

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld:

On behalf of Governor Sandoval, as his appointed designee, I am transmitting to you one hard

copy and one exact duplicate of the hard copy in electronic form of the Washoe County

Redesignation Request and Maintenance Planfor the Truckee Meadows 24-Hour PM10 NonAttainment Area (Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan). Additionally, the

Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan will be available soon on Washoe County’s

website at http://www.washoecounty.us/healthiair/sip.html. The Nevada Division of

Environmental Protection (NDEP) requests that USEPA Region IX approve the Redesignation

Request and Maintenance Plan into the Washoe County portion ofNevada’s applicable SIP and

redesignate the Truckee Meadows nonattainment area to attainment status for the 24-hour PM10

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

On July 13, 2009, the NDEP submitted a similar redesignation request and maintenance plan for

the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS on behalf of Washoe County. The USEPA determined that certain

portions of the 2009 submittal were not approvable. The enclosed Redesignation Request and

Maintenance Plan addresses USEPA’s comments and supersedes the 2009 submittal.

The Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan was properly noticed and adopted at a public

hearing of the Washoe County District Board of Health on August 28, 2014 (agenda item nine).

Documentation of the public participation and adoption process is enclosed. The enclosed

documents, developed by the Washoe County Air Quality Management Division, have been

evaluated for completeness by our agency pursuant to Appendix V to Part 51 of 40 CFR and

were found to be complete. If you have any questions or comments regarding this submittal,

please contact Charlene Albee or Yann Ling-Barnes at (775) 784-7200.

Sin erely,

olleen Cripps, Ph. D.

Administrator

901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 4001 • Carson City, Nevada 89701 • p: 775.687.4670 • f: 775.687.5856. ndep.nv.gov

Printed on recycled paper
Jared Blumenfeld

November 7, 2014

Page 2

Enclosures

cc w/o enclosures:

Cory Hunt, Policy Analyst, Office ofthe Governor

Karma O’Connor, Planning Office AIR-2, USEPA Region 9

Charlene Albee, Director, Air Quality Management Division, WCDHD

ec wlo enclosures:

Jasmine Mehta, Chief Bureau ofAir Quality Planning, NDEP

Certified MailNo. 9171 969009350012691743
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.
C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2018, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Gustavo Javier Lopez, Chief Administrative Officer and Investor Relation Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 29, 2018.





| | /s/ Gustavo Javier Lopez                                          | 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                                                                   | 
| | Name: Gustavo Javier Lopez                                       
| | Title: Chief Administrative Officer and Investor Relation
Officer
exv10w3






Exhibit 10.3




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the reference of our firm under the caption “Experts” and to the use of our report,
dated February 7, 2006, with respect to the statutory-basis statements of operations, changes in
policyowners’ surplus, and cash flow of Federal Life Insurance Company (Mutual) for the year ended
December 31, 2005 included in the Pre-Effective Amendment
No. 2 to the Registration Statement (Form
N-4 No. 333-147464) and related Prospectus of Federal Life Variable Annuity Account A for the
registration of securities to be sold under individual variable deferred annuity contracts with
Federal Life Insurance Company (Mutual).



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 	 
	 	Ernst & Young LLP 	 
	 	 	 
	 



Chicago, Illinois

August 12, 2008