alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Costamare Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  
|--
|1.
|  
|2.

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

Date: March 22, 2011

|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Gregory Zikos      
|Name:  |  | Gregory Zikos          
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7154
ERNEST EDWARD BRIM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PATRICIA L. HUFFMAN; R.A. YOUNG; RON ANGELONE; PADMAJA POLAVARAPU, Physician; DENNIS M.SPRAGUE; D.W. BARNES; OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. J ames C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1264-R) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ernest Edward Brim, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Mark Dudley Obenshain, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brim v. Huffman , No. CA-95-1264-R (W.D. Va. June 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements No.333-171666, No.333-179662 and No.333-186978 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 24, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of iSoftStone Holdings
Limited, its subsidiaries and variable interest entity (collectively, the Group) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Groups adoption of the authoritative guidance on
the presentation of comprehensive income), and our report dated April 24, 2013 relating to the effectiveness of the Groups internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of iSoftStone Holdings Limited
for the year ended December 31, 2012.



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP
|Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP    
|Beijing, the Peoples Republic of China                      
|                                                             
|April 24, 2013
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Make Smokey Bear smile never play with matches

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Make Smokey Bear smile never play with matches 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  Advertising CouncilUnited States. Department of Agriculture 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Advertising CouncilUnited States. Department of Agriculture. 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Poster has sliding tabs which pull down from left to right to reveal its message of not playing with matches. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  140 × 89 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  index.cpd 

Part of: Make Smokey Bear smile never play with matches (2 objects)     Next

Make Smokey Bear smile never play with matches

Make Smokey Bear smile never play with matches

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
(Reap. Dec. 10230)

#### Universal Enterprises, by: Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., of L.A. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4103, etc.

(Decided April 23, 1962)

*Lawrence é Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*William, H. Orrioh, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of this decision, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are limited to the merchandise shipped by Nihon Chikuzai Kogei Co. Ltd., T. Higalsi & Co. Ltd., and Hasegawa Shoten Co. of Japan.

> 2. That the said merchandise was appraised under Section 402, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938.

> 3. That no foreign value, as defined by Section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, existed for such or similar merchandise.

> 4. That at the time of exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, were the unit invoice values less the proportionate share of the inland freight, storage, hauling and lighterage, insurance premium and petty shown on the invoices to be included in the unit invoice values.

> 5. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A”, as heretofore limited, are submitted on this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for determination of the values of the merchandise shipped by Nihon Chikuzai Kogei Co., Ltd., T. Higaki *630& Co., Ltd., and Hasegawa Slioten Co. of Japan, described in the invoices covered by the entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values of the respective items of merchandise are the unit invoice values, less the proportionate share of the inland freight, storage, hauling and lighterage, insurance premium, and petties, all as shown on the invoices which are included in the official papers filed with the court in the several suits.

As to all other merchandise, these appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
ex10_2.htm


    
      

    

    
      Exhibit
10.2

      


      ADDENDUM
TO

      STOCK
PLEDGE AGREEMENT

      


      ADDENDUM, dated August 18,
2008, by and between POSITRON
CORPORATION, a publicly-owned Texas corporation (the “Pledgor”) and IMAGIN MOLECULAR CORPORATION,
a publicly-owned Delaware corporation (the “Secured Party”)(collectively,
the “Parties”).

       

      W I T N E S S E T H

      


       

      WHEREAS, the Parties entered
into a Stock Pledge Agreement on April 10, 2008 (the “Agreement”) to provide
that One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of Pledgor’s common stock, par
value $0.01 per share (the “Pledged Securities”) secure the Pledgor’s
obligations under a Promissory Note in the original, principal amount of One
Million Three Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Dollars ($1,364,000) (the
“Note”).

      


      WHEREAS, the Parties desire to
amend the Agreement in order that the Pledged Securities secure an additional
Promissory Note in the original, principal amount of Eight Hundred Thirty-Five
Thousand Dollars ($835,000)(“Note 2”)

      


      IT IS AGREED THAT, the Note,
as that term is in the Agreement, is hereby amended and deemed to include Note
2, and that the Secured Party shall have all rights and privileges related to
Note 2 as to the Note as contained in the Agreement.

      


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered on
the day and year first above written.

      


      
        	 
      	
                IMAGIN
      MOLECULAR CORPORATION

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                By:

              	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                COREY
      S. CONN,

              
	 
      	 
      	
                CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                POSITRON
      CORPORATION

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                By:

              	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                PATRICK
      G. ROONEY,

              
	 
      	 
      	
                CHAIRMAN
#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6700.

Entry No. 715822, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, August 14, 1941, etc.

Certified August 14, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, -N. Y., September 24, 1941, etc.

(Decided January 6, 1947)

*John R. Rafter*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, raise for determination the question of the correctness of the action of the appraiser in including as a part of the dutiable value of the merchandise the amount of a so-called British purchase tax. The appeals have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the agreed facts and the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 71 (Friday, April 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18746-18747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7033]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

April 9, 2007.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before May 14, 
2007 to be assured of consideration.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

    OMB Number: 1513-XXXX.
    Type of Review: Existing collection in use without an OMB Control 
Number.
    Title: Distilled Spirits Bond.
    Form: TTB 5110.56.

[[Page 18747]]

    Description: TTB F 5110.56 is used by proprietors of Distilled 
Spirits Plants (DSPs) and Alcohol Fuel Plants to file bond coverage 
with TTB. Using this form, these proprietors may file coverage and/or 
withdraw coverage for one plant or multiple plants. With this form 
proprietors of DSPs may also provide operations coverage for adjacent 
wine cellars. The bond may be secured through a surety company or it 
may be secured with collateral (cash, Treasury Bonds or Treasury 
Notes). The bond protects the revenue by ensuring adequate assets are 
available to pay tax liabilities.
    Respondents: Business and other for profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 232 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Frank Foote, (202) 927-9347, Alcohol and Tobacco 
Tax and Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G. Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20005.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Michael A. Robinson,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-7033 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

**Zuoan Fashion Limited**

 

List of Subsidiaries

 
| **Subsidiary **               | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of   Incorporation** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|------------|
| Fast Boost Holdings Limited        |       | British Virgin Islands                   |       |
| Champion Goal Holdings Limited     |       | British Virgin Islands                   |       |
| Zuoan Dress Co., Ltd., Shishi |       | People’s Republic of China          |       |
| Shanghai Mingfu Fashion Limited    |       | People’s Republic of China          |       |

 

----
No. 59145.

protests 196935-K, etc. (New York).

#### Camilli Albert & Laloue, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*407Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### William Bernstein & Co. et al v. United States

No. 7543.

Entry No. 769965, etc.

Invoices dated Calcutta, India, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 19, 1946, etc.

*386(Decided February 18, 1948)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in sched-mile A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties tere to:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the issues in the appeals to reappraisement listed hei'ewith are the same in all material 'respects as the issues decided in *United States*v. *Fritzsche Bros. Inc.,*Suit 4572 and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the entered values of the merchandise Involved in the cases listed herewith are equal to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise •was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise was no higher.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the entered values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

CHRISTOPHER M. BALSLEY,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

STATE OF OHIO, et al., CASE NO. C2-12-097

JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Defendants. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or

trial.

Pursuant to the Order filed May 31, 2012, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this case.

Date: May 31, 2012 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00097-EAS-MRA Doc #: 38 Filed: 05/31/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2008255EN.01000102.xml

| 8.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5249 — Edison/Hellenic Petroleum/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 255/02)

On 27 August 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5249. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5249. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.F. Hughes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.



/s/ J.F. Hughes
--------------------------
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
April 5, 2005
# C_2008228EN.01000202.xml

| 5.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5235 — Sabanci/Verbund/Baskent)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 228/04)

On 25 August 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5235. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5235. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---