alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007315EN.01004402.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/44

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 15 October 2007 — cApStAn v Commission

(Case T-287/07) (1)

1

(2007/C 315/84)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 22.9.2007.

1

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Radiosonde observations

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Radiosonde observations 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  143 × 56 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  PostersMaps 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

Part of: Radiosonde observations (2 objects)     Next

Radiosonde observations

Radiosonde observations

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2008234EN.01S00301.xml

| 12.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
# C_2008003EN.01000601.xml

| 8.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 January 2008

(2008/C 3/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4723 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 160,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4498 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,74625 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3625 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6396 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,01 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8685 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,145 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,32 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6984 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,605 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5955 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,418 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7228 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6856 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4714 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4862 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9228 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1116 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 384,55 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1662 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7021 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,35 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 899,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8314 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,217 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,995 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,801 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6027 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0863 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4723

JPY

Japanese yen

160,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4498

GBP

Pound sterling

0,74625

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3625

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6396

ISK

Iceland króna

91,01

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8685

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,145

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,32

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6984

PLN

Polish zloty

3,605

RON

Romanian leu

3,5955

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,418

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7228

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6856

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4714

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4862

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9228

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1116

KRW

South Korean won

1 384,55

ZAR

South African rand

10,1662

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7021

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,35

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 899,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8314

PHP

Philippine peso

60,217

RUB

Russian rouble

35,995

THB

Thai baht

43,801

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6027

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0863

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6704.

Entry No. 726597.

Invoice dated London, England, April 1943.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 10, 1943.

(Decided January 6, 1947)

*Marlow & Hines*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the-value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry becaus : of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark J. Stockslager, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report);

(2) Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this Report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods covered in this Report;

(4) The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

(b) {Intentionally Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III.E.};

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2008 (the
Evaluation Date), based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this Report any change in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter ended on the Evaluation Date that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control
over financial reporting; and

(5) The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



|                  |  |                             
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------
|February 13, 2009 |  | /s/ Mark J. Stockslager     
|                  |  | Mark J. Stockslager         
|                  |  | SunLink Health Systems, Inc.
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John G. Sharkey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 The foregoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose.


/s/ John G. Sharkey

Vice President-Finance

and Chief Financial Officer



January 7, 2011
### Summary of Status of Convention

Instrument Date of entry into forceNo. of Contracting States / Parties% world tonnage* IMO Convention 17-Mar-58 170 97.16 SOLAS 1974 25-May-80 162 99.20 SOLAS Protocol 1978 1-May-81 117 96.86 SOLAS Protocol 1988 3-Feb-00 104 95.70 Stockholm Agreement 1996 1-Apr-97 11 8.59 LL 1966 21-Jul-68 161 99.19 LL Protocol 1988 3-Feb-00 98 95.96 TONNAGE 1969 18-Jul-82 152 99.06 COLREG 1972 15-Jul-77 155 98.71 CSC 1972 6-Sep-77 78 60.95 1993 amendments Not yet in force 9 6.18 SFV Protocol 1993 Not yet in force 17 19.78 STCW 1978 28-Apr-84 157 99.23 STCW-F 1995 29-Sep-12 16 4.37 SAR 1979 22-Jun-85 104 62.49 STP 1971 2-Jan-74 1723.98 SPACE STP 1973 2-Jun-77 1623.33 IMSO 1976 Convention 16-Jul-79 97 94.92 1998 amendments 31-Jul-01 4026.91 2008 amendments** Not yet in force** 10 3.65 FAL 1965 05-Mar-67 115 90.77 MARPOL 73/78 (Annex I/II) 2-Oct-83 152 99.20 MARPOL 73/78 (Annex III) 1-Jul-92 138 97.59 MARPOL 73/78 (Annex IV) 27-Sep-03 131 89.65 MARPOL 73/78 (Annex V) 31-Dec-88 144 98.47 MARPOL Protocol 1997 (Annex VI)19-May-05 72 94.30 LC 1972 30-Aug-75 87 67.17 1978 amendments Not yet in force 20 17.49 LC Protocol 1996 24-Mar-06 42 35.64 INTERVENTION 1969 6-May-75 87 75.10 INTERVENTION Protocol 1973 30-Mar-83 5450.36 CLC 1969 19-Jun-75 36 2.59 CLC Protocol 1976 8-Apr-81 5356.41 CLC Protocol 1992 30-May-96 130 97.19 FUND Protocol 1976*** 22-Nov-94 31 47.33 FUND Protocol 1992 30-May-96 111 91.22 FUND Protocol 2000  27-Jun-01

- - FUND Protocol 2003 3-Mar-05 2820.44 NUCLEAR 1971 15-Jul-75 1720.38 PAL 1974 28-Apr-87 3545.88 PAL Protocol 1976 30-Apr-89 2645.44 PAL Protocol 1990 Not yet in force 6 0.85 PAL Protocol 2002 Not yet in force 9 2.11 LLMC 1976 1-Dec-86 5353.75 LLMC Protocol 1996 13-May-04 4645.95 as at 31 January 2013

### Summary of Status of Convention

SUA 1988 1-Mar-92 160 94.63 SUA Protocol 1988 1-Mar-92 148 89.65 SUA 2005 28-Jul-10 23 30.49 SUA Protocol 2005 28-Jul-10 19 29.75 SALVAGE 1989 14-Jul-96 6350.48 OPRC 1990 13-May-95 104 70.8 HNS Convention 1996 Not yet in force 14 13.61 HNS PROT 2010 Not yet in force

- - OPRC/HNS 2000 14-Jun-07 2845.35 BUNKERS Convention 2001 21-Nov-08 68 90.00 AFS Convention 2001 17-Sep-08 64 83.04 BWM Convention 2004 Not yet in force 3629.07 NAIROBI WRC 2007 Not yet in force 6 2.81 HONG KONG Convention Not yet in force

- - Cape Town Agreement 2012 Not yet in force

- -

** ** Entered into force by means of tacit acceptance procedure on 27 June 2011 *Source: IHS-Fairplay - World Fleet Statistics 31 December 2011 ** At its twentieth session, the IMSO Assembly decided to apply the amendments provisionally, with effect from 6 October 2008, pending their formal entry into force *** Consequent on the cessation of the 1971 Fund Convention on 24 May 2002 this Protocol is considered having ceased with effect from the same date.
EXHIBIT 11
                                   -----------
                             TEXFI INDUSTRIES, INC.
                             ----------------------
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                        ----------------------------------
   
                                                   Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                 January 30,   January 31,
                                                    1998         1997
                                                 -----------   -------------
                                                  Restated
NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING:
  Balance at beginning and end of period .........    8,859,098     8,735,491
                                                     ==========   ===========

BASIC:
  Net (loss) income ..............................  $  (897,000)  $ 1,047,000
                                                    ===========   ===========

Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding ..........................    8,859,098     8,735,491
                                                     ==========   ===========

  Per common share amounts:
       Net (loss) income .........................   $     (.10)  $       .12
                                                     ==========   ===========


DILUTED:
  Net (loss) income ..............................  $  (897,000)  $ 1,153,000
                                                    ===========   ===========

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
  Common stock outstanding for the period based
    on a daily weighted average ..................   8,859,098     8,735,491
  Common stock equivalents - outstanding stock
    options computed on the treasury stock method
    by using average market prices ...............          --       121,093
                                                    ----------    ----------
                                                     8,859,098     8,856,584
  Increase in common shares assuming conversion
    of the 11-1/4% Convertible Senior Subordinated
    Debentures ...................................        --         548,647
                                                    ----------    ----------

Weighted average number of common
    shares outstanding ...........................   8,859,098     9,385,231
                                                   ===========   ===========


Per common share amounts: Excluding convertible
  debenture shares:
      Net (loss) income ........................   $      (.10)   $      .12
                                                   ===========    ==========
  Including convertible Debenture Shares:
      Net (loss) income ........................   $      (.10)   $      .12
                                                   ===========    ==========
Douglas W

. Domenech Secretary ofNatural Resources 

# COMMONWEALTHofVIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Street address: 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219

Mailing address: P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, Virginia 23218 TOO (804) 698-4021 www.deq.virginia.gov

July 17, 2013

Ms. Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division (3APOO) US Environmental Protection Agency, Region Ill 1650 Arch St, Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

### RECEIVED 

## JUL 24

## 201.~ AirProte t· 

### c 1on Divl · (3AP10) S J on

David K

. Paylor Director (804) 698-4000 1-800-592-5482

Reference: Supplemental attainment year 2007 emissions inventories, Northern Virginia PM2.s Maintenance Plan
Dear Ms. Esher,
The purpose ofthis letter is to transmit additional information regarding the 2007 attainment year inventory that supports the Washington DC-MD-VA 1997 PM2.s Maintenance Plan. While not required by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance on the development of maintenance plans, EPA Region Ill has advised the air agencies ofthe District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia that this information will facilitate review ofthe plan in light of the recent court ruling (Court ofAppeals for the District of Columbia in NRDC v. EPA, No. 08-1250, January 4, 2013) which overturned and remanded EPA's PM2

.5 implementation rules. Therefore, enclosed with this letter are summaries ofthe supplemental year 2007 emissions inventories for volatile organic compounds (VOC) and ammonia (NH 3) for Washington DC-MD-VA states (Table 1).
Please note that the detailed emissions inventories for VOC and NH 3 were previously submitted in electronic spreadsheets as part ofAppendix A2 of the plan for the attainment year 2007 for all sources except for NMIM and MOVES201 Oa. However, the VOC and NH 3 columns were hidden in those spreadsheets because originally EPA's 1997 fine particle implementation guidance did not require them. Table 2 (enclosed) provides the location ofthese data in their respective spreadsheets. Summaries ofthe NMIM and MOVES2010a emissions inventories are also provided in Table 1.

### If you have any questions concerning this information, please do not hesitate to call me at (804) 698-4284 or Mr. Thomas R. Ballou of my staff 

### at (804) 698-4406.

MGD/dam
Enclosure 

### Sine 

# /: &
Michael G. Dowd Director Air Division

SIPNONA TTN PLANS\REDESGN\NVA3-PM\NVPM-MP-INV.DOC

### Table 1: 2007 Attainment Year Inventory, tons per year

Point Area Nonroad Onroad Total State EGU NonEGU Total NMIM MAR Total NH3 

### voc NH3 

### voc NH3 

### voc NH3 

### voc NH, 

### voc NH3 

### voc NH, 

### voc NH, 

### voc NH3 

### voc District of Columbia 0 2 0 58 0 59 183 5,516 3 1 ,324 0.004 34 3 1,357 195 3,362 381 1,508 Maryland 0 180 4 539 4 719 3,079 21,928 10 9,617 0.01 260 10 9,877 929 18,449 4,021 11,397 Virginia 50 38 2 558 52 596 962 26,501 11 9,334 0.2 833 11 10, 167 777 15,703 1 ,802 12,153 Washington DC-MD-VA 50 220 6 1 ,155 56 1,375 4,224 53,944 23 20,275 0 1 , 127 23 21,402 1 ,90 1 37 ,514 6 ,204 25 ,058 Area

- -



### Table 2: VOC & 

### NH 3 

### Emissions Data (Appendix A2)
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Tianwen Liu, Chief Executive Officer of iSoftStone Holdings Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date: April 24, 2013



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Tianwen Liu        
|Name:  |  | Tianwen Liu            
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1879

PASCAL KOUADIO,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: January 17, 2014 Decided: January 31, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed in part; denied in part by unpublished per 

curiam opinion.

Godwill C. Tachi, TACHI LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, 

William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Mona Maria Yousif,

Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Pascal Kouadio, a native and citizen of the Ivory 

Coast, petitions for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. 

We have reviewed the administrative record and Kouadio’s 

contentions and find that we lack jurisdiction over the claims 

challenging the Board’s order of March 19, 2013, from which 

Kouadio failed to file a timely petition for review. See

Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). Accordingly, we dismiss 

the petition for review in part with respect to those claims. 

Next, after reviewing Kouadio’s claims relative to the instant 

order under review, we conclude that the Board did not abuse its 

discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.2(a) (2013). We therefore deny the petition for review 

in part for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kouadio

(B.I.A. June 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART;

DENIED IN PART
# Enclosure II

ARB Public Hearing Notice