alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Emissions Defect Information Report

(EDIR Number: 2011.02.16.02)

1. Manufacturer: Kia Motors Corporation

2. Description of the defect:

Kia has received some owner complaints regarding cooling performance on some 2010 model

year Forte's equipped 2.0/2.4 liter engines. The main complaint is air-conditioner doesn't get

cold enough at idle under certain circumstances.

To improve customer satisfaction, Kia will modify the idle rpm from 620rpm to 850rpm in

A/CON-on condition to assist the compressor to provide sufficient cooling.

Description of vehicles potentially affected by the defect:

Maker Model Model Year Test Group Sales Volume

Kia

Forte 2.0L

2010

AKMXV02.0TW5 (ULEV) 23,711

AKMXV02.0TWN (ULEV) 30,965

AKMXV02.0TPC (SULEV) 26,428

AKMXV02.4DW5 (ULEV) 11,229

AKMXV02.4DPC (SULEV) 4,225

Forte 2.4L

The number of vehicles containing the defect and the means by which the number of involved

vehicles was determined:

Number of involved vehicles:

All vehicles could be potentially affected by this problem.

Address of involved assembly plant:

Hwaseong Assembly Plant, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea

5. Evaluation of the emission and driveability impact of the defect:

It is Kia's assessment that while there may be some minor increase in idle emissions due to the increase

in rpm at idle, this increase will be negligible compared to overall engine emissions. There is no effect to

driveability.

6. Available emission data that relate to the defect:

No specific test data is available.

Anticipated follow-up by KIA

Kia will publish a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) to provide repair information to KIA

dealers for this condition, and will reprogram affected powertrain control units as necessary.

2011-02-17 05:20 / This document is the !Merl

written permission. Violation of this rule will st

roperty of I IA I GI. You may not copy or distribute it without

e to criminal and civil liability.
No. 62006.

#### Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 312782-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Strength in diversity; strategic initiative ERR-16, minorities & women within IRS, a plan for the future

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Strength in diversity; strategic initiative ERR-16, minorities & women within IRS, a plan for the future 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Document ; 7635 (9-90); Document (United States. Internal Revenue Service) ; 7635. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 41 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  022933019.jpg; 022933019.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Xiaosong Zhang, Chief Financial Officer of iSoftStone Holdings Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date: April 24, 2013



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Xiaosong Zhang     
|Name:  |  | Xiaosong Zhang         
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Denied, Motion for Emergency Relief 

Denied as Moot, and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00524-CV

IN RE CHRISTOPHER SPATES, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2001-61475

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 2, 2014, relator Christopher Spates filed a petition for writ of habeas 

corpus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In 

the petition, relator asks this Court to vacate an order issued on or about June 2, 

2014 by the Honorable Bonnie Crane Hellums, presiding judge of the 247th 

District Court of Harris County, finding relator in contempt and confining him to 

the Harris County Jail for 180 days. Also on July 2, 2014, relator filed a motion for 
2

emergency relief, asking this Court to temporarily release relator from confinement

pending this Court’s disposition of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 52.8(b)(3), 52.10. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3(k)(1)(A) provides that a relator 

must include in the appendix “a certified or sworn copy of any order complained

of, or any other document showing the matter complained of.” The combined 

judgment of contempt and order of commitment relator includes in his appendix is 

not a certified or sworn copy. Without a sufficient record, relator cannot satisfy his 

burden to demonstrate entitlement to habeas relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. We also 

deny as moot relator’s motion for emergency relief. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise.
SERVED: JANUARY 22, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC IN THE MATTER OF PETERJOHN ROSSICK, III DOCKETNO. FAA-2011-0065 (Civil Penalty Action)
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING**'~**c: . !- ,- -- ,--·

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2010SW290012) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, andthe other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment
- Service ListSERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

PeterJohn Rossick, III, Respondent 325 Greyhawk Court Vacaville, CA 95688 ONE COPY

YolandaAyala Bernal, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration SouthwestRegion, ASW-7E3, YAB Office ofthe Regional Counsel 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort Worth, TX 76137 TEL: 817-222-5070 FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2011-0065 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### 2
# C_2007170EN.01002102.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 June 2007 — Davi v Commission

(Case T-433/04) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - 2003 Promotion procedure - Decision not to promote - Award of promotion points - Consideration of the comparative merits - Equal treatment - General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Plea of illegality - Legitimate expectations)

(2007/C 170/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Angela Davi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, initially, and subsequently by C. Berardis-Kayser and M. Velardo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of the Appointing Authority's decision of 2 July 2004 rejecting the applicant's complaint against that authority's decision not to promote her to Grade C2 for the 2003 promotion procedure and, secondly, in so far as necessary, of the original decision which was the subject of that complaint.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 8.1.2005.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                             47
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                          3,071
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 12,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                           15
<OTHER-SE>                      1,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   12,236
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  470
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      68
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   36
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    54
<INCOME-TAX>                       19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                35
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                       35
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 8787)

#### Derby & Co. (Metals & Minerals), Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 861631.

(Decided April 18, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

Presented for determination by the court is the proper dutiable value of an importation of ferro-tungsten imported *630from England which forms the subject of this appeal for a reappraisement.

The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that at the time of exportation of the involved ferro-tungsten the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities, and in the ordinary course of trade, was 9 shillings, 3 pence (British currency) per pound, tungsten content, net, packed. It was further stipulated and agreed by the parties that at the time of exportation of the ferro-tungsten in issue there was no higher export value for such or similar merchandise.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is 9 shillings, 3 pence (British currency) per pound, tungsten content, net, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
December 28, 1938

No. 40274.

Suit *4155.*

#### *United States*v. *Carl Zeiss, Inc.*

T. D. 49263 affirmed.
Exhibit 10.5.2




---



##### 



SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT
 Retirement Benefit
 Death Benefit
 2




---



##### 



TIME AND FORM OF PAYMENT
 3




---



##### 



FORFEITURE UPON TERMINATION FOR CAUSE; PAYMENT UPON CHANGE IN CONTROL
 Forfeiture Upon Termination for Cause
  4




---



##### 



Payment Upon Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason After a Change in
Control.
  ABSENCE OF FUNDING
 5




---



##### 



DEFINITIONS
  Beneficiary
 Board
 Cause
 6




---



##### 



Change in Control.
  7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



Code
 Death Benefit
 Disability
 Good Reason
  9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



Retirement Benefit
 Separation from Service
 Service
 11




---



##### 



Specified Employee
 MISCELLANEOUS
    12




---



##### 



13




---



##### 



ROCKVILLE BANKBy

/s/ Anne
McConnellAnne McConnellVP Human Resources OfficerROCKVILLE FINANCIAL, INC.By

/s/ Judy
Keppner ClarkIts Judy Keppner ClarkAVP/Corporate Secretary/s/ Richard J. TrachimowiczRichard J. Trachimowicz 14




---



##### 



Primary BeneficiaryBeneficiary(ies)Address andZip CodeBirth DateSoc. Sec. No.RelationshipPercentage
  Alternate BeneficiaryBeneficiary(ies)Address andZip CodeBirth DateSoc. Sec. No.RelationshipPercentage
 o o
 Signature of Witness
    
    Richard J. TrachimowiczWitness Signature Date
    
    Date
 15
No. 47980.

#### Protests 560462-G, etc., of Kaplan Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel.and on the authority of *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) was sustained.
Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 1 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 2 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 3 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 4 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 5 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 6 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 7 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 8 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 9 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 10 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 11 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 12 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 13 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 14 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 15 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 16 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01136-EAS-NMK Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/05/14 Page: 17 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T16:22:16-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 46256.

#### Protests 800431-G, etc., of George H. Barrel et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2007283EN.01004502.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/45

---

Action brought on 24 September 2007 — De Fays v Commission

(Case F-97/07)

(2007/C 283/82)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Chantal De Fays (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P.-P. Gehuchten and Ph. Reyniers, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority of 21 June 2007 and, so far as necessary, its decision of 21 November 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority of 21 June 2007 and, so far as necessary, its decision of 21 November 2006;

| — | order the Commission to pay the salaries suspended, plus default interest; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the salaries suspended, plus default interest;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a Commission official suffering from a sickness which she claims forced her absence from work, challenges the decisions of the appointing authority to treat her successive absences from 19 October 2006 as unauthorised and to therefore apply Article 60 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities (‘the Staff Regulations’) with regard to her.

The applicant first submits that the arbitration procedure initiated on the basis of Article 59 of the Staff Regulations took place in breach of her right to a fair hearing and the rule of audi alteram partem. What is more, the report of the independent doctor did not give sufficient reasons and was vitiated by a manifest error of assessment.

audi alteram partem

The applicant also maintains that the decision forcing her to go to the workplace, in the light of current scientific opinion, infringes the principle of taking precautions.

---
No. 47510.

#### Protests 59147-K, etc., of C. J. Tower & Sons et al. (Buffalo, etc.).

*404Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibt
      4.9

     

    REVOLVING
      LOAN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
      FOUR

     

    Amendment
      Date: June
      20,
      2008

     

    Amended
      Credit Limit: $50,000.00                

     

    RFG
      Acquisition II Inc., a Delaware corporation, promises to pay RICHARD F. BESTON,
      JR. (“Lender”), an individual, the amended sum of FIFTY THOUSAND and 00/100
      DOLLARS ($50,000.00) (the “Amended Credit Limit”) or such other principal amount
      that may be outstanding, in no case to exceed the Amended Credit Limit, as
      evidenced by the books and records of the Lender. 

     

    This
      Amendment Four hereby amends the Credit Limit as defined in the Revolving Loan
      Agreement, dated November 20, 2006, as amended, by and among RFG Acquisition
      II
      Inc. and Richard F. Beston, Jr. All other terms and conditions of the original
      Revolving Loan Agreement, dated November 20, 2006, as amended, remain unchanged
      and in full force and effect.

    


    This
      Amendment Four is effective as of the date listed above.

    

      
        	
                RFG
                  Acquisition II Inc.  

                 

                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                By:
                  

              	
                /s/ David
                  W. Matre

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
              
	
                 

              	
                David
                  W. Matre

                Chief
                  Financial Officer

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 
	
                 

              	 	
                 

              	
                 

              	 


      

       

      
        	
                “Lender”   

                 

                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                 

              	
                /s/ 
                  Richard F. Beston, Jr.

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
              
	
                 

              	
                RICHARD
                  F. BESTON, JR., an individual

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 


      

    

     

    


    DO
      NOT DESTROY THIS ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT