alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 924 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 924

To prohibit the Corps of Engineers from issuing a permit for the Delta 
                          Conveyance Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

Mr. Harder of California (for himself, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. Thompson of 
California, and Mr. Garamendi) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Corps of Engineers from issuing a permit for the Delta 
                          Conveyance Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Delta Tunnel Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DELTA CONVEYANCE PROJECT PERMIT.

    The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, 
may not issue a permit under section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) relating to the Delta Conveyance Project 
described in the document published by the Corps of Engineers entitled 
``Delta Conveyance Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement'' and 
dated December 2022.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 11, 2019

a1204 

# Order

Clerk December 11, 2019

159313

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159313

COA: 345529

Muskegon CC: 14

- 064458

- FC

DEREK JAMES RAINBOLT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Jan uary 22, 2019

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Muskegon Circuit Court for

reconsideration of the defendant’s challenge to Barbara Cross’s testimony, f irst addressed

in the circuit court’s March 1 5 , 2018 opinion denying relief from judgment, in light of

People v Thorpe , 504 Mich 230 (2019). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED,

because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presen ted should be reviewed

by this Court.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2014

d0127 

# Order

Clerk January 31, 2014

147194(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147194

COA: 311669

Wayne CC: 93

- 004064

- FC

DARRYL BELL

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September

30, 2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order

was entered erroneously.
# Please Read - Disclaimer

# OJT Matrix_x000a_
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00444

- CR

BILLY JOSHUA MERCHAN T , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the County Court at Law No

. 1 Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 4799

- A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Billy Joshua Merchant appeals his conviction for speeding, 20

- 22 over the limit.

By letter dated December 18, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified Merchant that the

appeal was s ubject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction because the judgment

underlying this appeal is a County Court at Law judgment in a trial de novo appeal

from an inferior court and the County Court at Law judgment does not impose a fine or

affirm a fine in exce ss of $100. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 4.03. By the same

letter, the Clerk also warned Merchant that the Court would dismiss the appeal unless,Merchant v. State Page 2 within 7 days from the date of the letter, a response was filed explaining why the Court

has jurisdic tion of this appeal. Merchant filed a response, but it does not show that the

Court has jurisdiction of this appeal.

This appeal is dismissed. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 44.3.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 2, 201 4 Do not publish [CR25]

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 49.1. If the appellant d esire s to have the decision of this C ourt reviewed by the Court of Criminal Appeals, a petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the day the court of appeals’ judgment was rendered or the d ay the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by the court of appeals. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 68.2 (a).
# C_2008202EN.01000702.xml

| 8.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5234 — Thomas Cook France/Jet Tours)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 202/04)

On 1 August 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5234. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5234. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132401 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132401 

 COA: 245456 

Oakland CC: 1999-166149-FC 

JOHNNY LEROY STANLEY 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BRASILAGRO  Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gustavo Javier Lopez, Chief Administrative Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/ Gustavo Javier Lopez    
|Gustavo Javier Lopez        
|Chief Administrative Officer

October 31, 2014
# C_2008100EN.01001901.xml

| 22.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/19

---

Call for proposals under the ‘Capacities’ work programme of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

(2008/C 100/07)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the ‘Capacities’ work programme of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call.

‘Capacities’ Specific Programme:

| Part | : | Science in Society |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Call Identifier | : | FP7-SCIENCE-IN-SOCIETY-2008-3 |

Part

:

Science in Society

Call Identifier

:

FP7-SCIENCE-IN-SOCIETY-2008-3

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2008) 1387 of 16 April 2008.

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2008) 1387 of 16 April 2008.

Information on the call budget, deadline and modalities, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
# C_2007283EN.01003001.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/30

---

Action brought on 13 September 2007 — SOMM v OHIM

(Case T-351/07)

(2007/C 283/55)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: SOMM Srl (San Mauro T.se, Italy) (represented by M. Ferro, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 28 June 2007 in Case R 1653/2006-1 concerning Community trade mark application No 4 837 746; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 28 June 2007 in Case R 1653/2006-1 concerning Community trade mark application No 4 837 746;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Three-dimensional trade mark described as follows: ‘Three-dimensional whole constituted by a large number of tubular posts of metal, placed at a distance from and aligned with each other, tapering and substantially curved at the bend, each having a base line, fixed to the ground, essentially vertical and a line with open extremities slightly inclined towards the top, a large number of tubular parts of metal, placed at a distance from and parallel with each other, fixed on inclined lines of those posts, and a cover to provide shade fixed on said tubular parts, the whole forming a shaded shelter’; Application No 4 837 736 for goods in Classes 6 and 19.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application for registration.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Error in determining the relevant public and the sector of reference and also the acquisition of distinctive character of the mark in question pursuant to Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2008008EN.01000101.xml

| 12.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/1

---

(2008/C 8/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 315, 22.12.2007

OJ C 315, 22.12.2007

Past publications

OJ C 297, 8.12.2007

OJ C 283, 24.11.2007

OJ C 269, 10.11.2007

OJ C 247, 20.10.2007

OJ C 235, 6.10.2007

OJ C 223, 22.9.2007

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2008194EN.01001001.xml

| 31.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/10

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2008/C 194/06)

OJ C 188, 25.7.2008

OJ C 188, 25.7.2008

History of previous publications:

OJ C 118, 15.5.2008

OJ C 106, 26.4.2008

OJ C 55, 28.2.2008

OJ C 9, 15.1.2008

OJ C 4, 9.1.2008

OJ C 246, 20.10.2007

---
Before the Second Division,

January 4, 1939

No. 40298.

#### Protest 251281-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Filet lace articles similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Jabara*(22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
Before the Second Division,

May 19, 1945

No. 50199.

#### Protests 942409-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats or hoods composed of ramie and cellophane the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 47291, which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the items in question were held dutiable as claimed.
No. 56089.

protest 169698-K (Philadelphia).

#### Spatola Wines, Inc. *v.*United States,

*365Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

On the record presented the protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brendan Flood, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

Date: May 20, 2020

/s/ Brendan Flood

Brendan Flood

Chairman and Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Karen G. Adkins,

Plaintiff

 v.

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co.,

L.P.A.,,

Defendant

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00619

Magistrate Judge Abel

Order

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to remove plaintiff’s May 17, 2012 motion for

class certification (doc. 30) from the pending motion list because it is MOOTED by the

parties’ June 5, 2012 stipulation as to class action pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

s/ Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00619-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 06/18/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 56491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23365]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7581]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Picasso's Drawings, 1890-1921: Reinventing 
Tradition''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Picasso's Drawings, 1890-1921: Reinventing 
Tradition,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Frick Collection, New York, New York, from on or about October 4, 
2011, until on or about January 8, 2012, at the National Gallery of 
Art, Washington, DC from on or about February 5, 2012 to on or about 
May 6, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Kevin M. Gleeson, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 571-345-3006). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 7, 2011.
Lee Satterfield,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Acting Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-23365 Filed 9-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 6309

RAYMOND FITZGERALD , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Mark S. Davis , Chief District Judge. ( 2:18

- cv - 00561

- MSD

- DEM )

Submitted : March 4, 2021 Decided: March 16, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Raymond Fitzgerald, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raymond Fitzgerald seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying r elief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be
denied and advise d Fitzgerald that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation

w ould waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommen dation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v

. Duffy , 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 846

- 47 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 154

- 55 (1985). Fitzgerald ha s waived appellate review by failing to file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION OF 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Texas Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Richard M. Fowler, Executive Vice President-Finance of the Company, hereby certify that to
my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                                                               
|------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 27, 2007 |  | /s/ Richard M. Fowler                                         
|                          |  | Richard M. Fowler                                             
|                          |  | Executive Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Texas Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Texas Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case: 2:11-cv-00724-ALM-TPK Doc #: 36 Filed: 10/12/11 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00724-ALM-TPK Doc #: 36 Filed: 10/12/11 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T14:56:47-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
---

Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Timmins Gold Corp. (the Company) is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Amendment No. 1 to its
annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the
Report).

I, Ian Harcus, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|/s/ Ian Harcus                                                                | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                              | 
|Name: Ian Harcus                                                              | 
|                                                                              | 
|Title: Controller (Performing the functions of Chief
      Financial Officer) | 
|                                                                              | 
|Date: November 29, 2016                                                       | 

---