alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Northwest Region

Modernized Operations 

throughout Pacific Northwest corridor

Improved Reliability

from Vancouver to the Canadian border

22% Ridership Increase

in the region since 2005

The states of Washington and Oregon are 

planning for a future where trains provide 

a fast, reliable and affordable option for 

intercity travel in their growing region.

$66 million in HSIPR funding will provide 8 

locomotives to improve operations on the 

corridor and enhance passenger comfort 

and safety. 

Two round trips between Seattle and 

Portland will be added for a total of six 

daily, including one continuing north to 

Vancouver, BC, and two continuing south to 

Eugene. A seventh daily round trip is 

provided by Amtrak long-distance service 

continuing south to LA.

More than $86 million in HSIPR funding will 

provide significant congestion relief and 

improved service reliability through track, 

signal and siding improvements, as well as 

new customs inspection tracks near the 

border.

Two Additional Trains Per Day 

between Seattle and Portland

Federal Railroad 

Administration
2

Northwest Region

Federal Railroad Administration

Region Characteristics Route Diagram

Funding by Corridor and Source

+22%

Since 2005

National average:

+31%

FY05:

623,000

FY15:

751,000

Ridership Growth

Population

Economy

Land Area

Corridor Length 

(miles)

Investments $M 2009-2015

Federal Non-Federal Total

Eugene - Portland 123 $6 $6 $12 

Portland - Seattle 187 $800 $70 $870 

Seattle - Vancouver BC 157 $3 $5 $8 

Other Corridors / 

Freight Investments n/a $37 $108 $145 

State Rail Plans n/a $1 $0 $2 

TOTAL $847 $94 $1,037 

FY05 FY10 FY14

SOURCES : Population: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010. Economy: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 

2010. International Statistics: CIA World Factbook, 2012. Ridership: Amtrak, 2015. All Other 

Information: Federal Railroad Administration, 2016. Last revised October 3, 2016.

Global Rank

(comparableto)

19

(Switzerland)

23

(Portugal, Spain, 

France, and Belgium combined)

70

(Guatemala) 14M

4% of U.S.

$0.7Trillion

4% of U.S.

488,000 sq. mi.

14% of U.S.

Regional Rank

Includes HSIPR and TIGER investments. Totals may not add exactly due to rounding.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Sherwood Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: March 29, 2011
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates







NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION






OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE






The undersigned, Jeffrey L. Edwards, Vice-President, Operations of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as an Authorized Officer of the Company:






(1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of:  i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement, of the Company during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2012 (the “Reporting Period”); and






(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, i) the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period; and ii) no Servicer Default has occurred.






This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to (i) Section 3.01(c) of the Servicing Agreement, as amended, dated as of March 1, 1999, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, NILT Trust, as UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer; and (ii) Section 8.11(b) of the 2010-B SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of November 17, 2010, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as Titling Trust, NILT Trust, as Grantor and UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer (the “Agreement”).






Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 15th day of June, 2012.




/s/ Jeffrey L. Edwards


Jeffrey L. Edwards


Vice President, Operations
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Aviv Efrat, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

| /s/ Aviv Efrat |
|----------------|
| Name:          |   | Aviv Efrat |
| Title:         |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:          |   | November 14, 2018 |
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

|                                         |                                       |                                |
|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                         | **Harbin                  Electric, Inc.** |
|                                    |                                  |                           |
| Date: May                 15, 2006 | By:                              | /s/ Tianfu                Yang |
|                                         | Tianfu                Yang                 |
|                                         | Chief                Executive Officer     |

|                                         |                                   |                              |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                         |                                   |
|                                    |                              |                         |
| Date: May                 15, 2006 | By:                          | /s/ Zedong                Xu |
|                                         | Zedong                Xu               |
|                                         | Chief                Financial Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6588]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Pre-Knowledge of Early Hearing Detection and 
Intervention Program Process and Its Effect on Maternal Stress and 
Compliance With Follow-Up, Potential Extramural Project (PEP) 2007-R-07

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-4 p.m., May 16, 2007 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of PEP 2007-R-07, ``Pre-Knowledge of 
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program Process and Its 
Effect on Maternal Stress and Compliance with Follow-Up.''
    For Further Information Contact: Juliana Cyril, M.P.H., Ph.D., 
Associate Director for Policy and Peer Review, CDC, 1600 Clinton 
Road, NE., Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, telephone 404-639-4639.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 2, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E7-6588 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### Roy G. WOOTEN v. STATE of Arkansas

CA CR 90-89

799 S.W.2d 555

Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division II

Opinion delivered November 21, 1990

*J.F. Atkinson, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Steve Clark,*Att’y Gen., by: *Oían W. Reeves,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

George K. Cracraft, Judge.

Roy G. Wooten initially was charged by information with the offense of aggravated assault and attempted capital murder. On September 13, 1989, he entered a plea of nolo contendere to a reduced charge of attempted battery in the first degree. The plea bargaining agreement called for a sentence of ten years, with three years suspended. After conducting a hearing to determine that the plea had been voluntarily entered, the trial court accepted the plea. On *195September 23,1989, the order of commitment was signed by the trial court.

While in the Sebastian Detention Center awaiting transportation to the Arkansas Department of Correction, appellant filed papers which the trial court treated as a motion to vacate his plea. He subsequently was transported to the department of correction. New counsel was appointed for appellant, and a hearing was held on the motion on November 21,1989, after which the trial court entered an order denying the request to withdraw the plea. Appellant appeals from that order.

Appellant contends that the trial court should have vacated his plea pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 26.1 because the plea was involuntary and was entered without knowledge of the nature of the charge. We cannot agree.

Rule 26.1 (a) provides that a criminal defendant may withdraw his plea of guilty or nolo contendere upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the court that withdrawal is necessary to correct a “manifest injustice.” However, a motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to Rule 26.1 must be made and acted on before sentence is placed into execution. Once a valid sentence has been put into execution, the trial judge is without jurisdiction to vacate it. A sentence is placed into execution when the court issues a commitment order. *Redding v. State,*293 Ark. 411, 738 S.W.2d 410 (1987).

In this case, the sentence had been imposed, the commitment order issued, and the appellant transported to the department of correction before the motion was acted on. As the trial court was without jurisdiction to set aside the sentence, we do not address the issues raised on appeal.

Affirmed.

Cooper, and Mayfield, JJ., agree.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION

RESIDENTIAL FINANCE : 

CORPORATION, : 

 Plaintiff, : 

 v. : Case No. 2:11-cv-00008 

 : 

 : JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST 

 : 

 : MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL 

 UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP : 

 and IMMIGRATION SERVICES, : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Residential Finance Corporation (“RFC”), seeks judicial review, under the section 10b of 

the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 702, et seq. of the decision of the United 

States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to deny the H-1B visa petition filed by 

Plaintiff RFC on behalf of Geza Rakoczi (hereinafter “Beneficiary”). (ECF No. 1) The USCIS’ 

administrative record is the subject of judicial review for claims under the section 10b of the 

APA, 5 U.S.C. § 702, et seq. The administrative record contains information and documents 

protected from disclosure by the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. This “Confidential 

Information” consists of information or documents that pertain specifically to RFC or the 

Beneficiary, such as RFC’s proprietary business information and the Beneficiary’s personal 

residential, financial, and governmental assigned identification and travel documents (ex. state 

issued driver’s license, VISA, Employment Authorization Card, etc.). It is hereby ORDERED 

under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(b)(11), 38 U.S.C. § 5701(b)(2), and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

26(c), 5.2(c), and (e)(2) that USCIS disclose to the Court and to counsel for RFC a copy of the 

Case: 2:12-cv-00008-GLF-MRA Doc #: 14 Filed: 02/16/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2

administrative record of the decision of the USCIS to deny the H-1B visa petition filed by 

Plaintiff RFC on behalf of the Beneficiary (Bates labeled documents 1 through 157) which 

contains Confidential Information, without obtaining prior written consent of the individuals to 

whom the records pertain. Such disclosure is subject to the following conditions: 

1. The Confidential Information in the administrative record shall be used only for 

this litigation and shall not be disclosed outside this litigation. 

2. Access to and disclosure of Confidential Information in the administrative record 

shall be limited to the Court, the parties, the Beneficiary, counsel for the parties and their 

paralegals and legal assistants. RFC shall not disclose Confidential Information from the 

administrative record to anyone other than the persons authorized under this Paragraph. 

3. RFC’s obligations set forth in this Protective Order shall apply to its counsel and 

anyone acting on behalf of RFC to the same extent as they apply to it. 

4. This Protective Order does not affect any Confidential Information that RFC, its 

counsel or the Beneficiary, have in their possession from a source other than the administrative 

record, notwithstanding the fact that the Confidential Information also is reproduced in the 

administrative record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-00008-GLF-MRA Doc #: 14 Filed: 02/16/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case No. 8,567.

#### LOWE v. STOCKTON et al.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 537.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1835.

Negligence — Stage Ownehs — Carrying Opp Slaves — Customaky Diligence.

The owners of a stage-coach are liable for the negligence of their agent in suffering the plaintiff’s slaves to be taken away in their coach; but not if the agent has used all the diligence which» is customary and usual in similar cases.

This was an action upon the case for permitting the plaintiff’s slaves to be carried away in the defendant’s stage-coach. The slaves were colored persons. A decent, respectable-looking white woman, who gave her name as Powell, came to the stage-coach office of the defendants [Stockton & Stokes]in the morning of that day, or the day before, and told the office-keeper that she wished to take seats for two of her servants, and that they would be there at the time of the departure of the evening stage-coach; and she paid for their passage. The servants came at the time and said they were the persons for whom Mrs. Powell had paid the passage; and they were permitted to take their seats.

THE COURT,

at the prayer of Mr. Key, for plaintiff [Elizabeth Lowe], instructed the jury, as in Mandeville v. Cookenderfer [Case No. 9,009], at December term, 1827, that if they believe, from the evidence, that the slaves of the plaintiff were taken away, without her consent, in the stagecoach of the defendants, and that the agent of the defendants, by using due and reason*1018able diligence, could have prevented their being so taken away, and that the said agent did not use such due and reasonable diligence, then the defendants are liable.

And, at the prayer of Mr. Coxe, for defendants, further instructed them, that if they should believe from the evidence that the defendants’ said agent used all the diligence which is customary and usual in similar cases, then the plaintiff is not entitled to recover.

Verdict for the plaintiff, $200. But a new trial was granted upon new evidence discovered, that the woman, who paid for the seats of the slaves, was not named Powell, but Howard, and was the sister of the plaintiff, and resided with her.
Exhibit
No. 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the “Trust”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Roy
Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, certifies, to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.







TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST(Registrant)







Date:  November
      6, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      Roy ThomasRoy
      Thomas, General Agent and
              ChiefExecutive
      Officer
---

Exhibit 99.11

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year
ended December 31, 2013 (the Form 40-F) of Timmins Gold Corp., I, Richard
Gowans of Micon International Limited (Micon), hereby consent to the use of my
name and Micons name in connection with the references to the mineral reserve
and resource estimates for the San Francisco Project and to the technical report
entitled NI 43-101F1 Technical Report, Updated Resources and Reserves and Mine
Plan for the San Francisco Gold Project, Sonora, Mexico dated December 6, 2013
(collectively, the Technical Information) and to the incorporation by
reference of references to, and summaries of, the Technical Information in the
Form 40-F.

MICON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

/s/ Richard
GowansName: Richard Gowans Title: President

March 31, 2014

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Berry Only Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lisa Guise, as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 15, 2012               By /s/ Lisa Guise
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lisa Guise
                                        President, Secretary, Treasurer, Chief
                                        Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                                        Officer (Principal Executive Officer,
                                        Principal Accounting Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9116 

To make ineligible for asylum any alien who commits certain actions against 

the National Guard, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2024 

Mr. ARRINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To make ineligible for asylum any alien who commits certain 

actions against the National Guard, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALIENS WHO COMMIT CERTAIN ACTIONS 

4 AGAINST NATIONAL GUARD. 

5 Section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

6 (8 U.S.C. 1158) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(f) PROHIBITED ON ASYLUM.—Any alien who 

9 causes the destruction of any defensive barrier on the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9116 IH

1 United States border or uses force against a member of 

2 the National Guard— 

3 ‘‘(1) shall be ineligible to apply for asylum or 

4 any other status; and 

5 ‘‘(2) shall be subject to expedited removal not 

6 later than 72 hours after the alien is apprehended.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
| (1)suchAnnual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended February 29, 2020,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
| (2)theinformation contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for theyear ended February 29, 2020, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of LoopIndustries, Inc. |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |

| Date:May 5, 2020 |   | /s/ Nelson Gentiletti                                                                                                         |   |
|------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|             |   | NelsonGentiletti                                                                                                              |   |
|             |   | ChiefOperating Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(principal financial officer and principal accountingofficer) |   |