alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008178EN.01001901.xml

| 15.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/19

---

NOTICE OF VACANCY

NOTICE OF VACANCY

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

OPEN COMPETITION

OPEN COMPETITION

Ref. CONS/AD/430

ADMINISTRATOR

ADMINISTRATOR

(2008/C 178/17)

The General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union is organising an open competition (on the basis of qualifications and an oral test) to establish reserve lists in the field of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). The competition concerns two profiles (profile 1: Senior Strategic Planners for Crisis Management Operations and Missions; profile 2: Senior Capability Development Planners: Military/Civilian/Space). For both profiles, recruitment will be to grade AD 9.

on the basis of qualifications and an oral test

profile 1

profile 2

The selection procedure requires, for both profiles, applicants to have a full university education, evidenced by a diploma. For profile 1 it is also essential to have at least ten years' professional experience in the field of crisis management or defence, including professional experience of crisis management by international organisations. Minimum three years of this experience must be in planning at politico-strategic level. For profile 2 it is also essential to have at least ten years' professional experience in a defence planning department at national or international level or in civilian or military capability planning at national or international level or in conception and operation of space or dedicated information systems for security.

profile 1

profile 2

This recruitment notice is published in English and French only. The full text, in both languages, appears in Official Journal C 178 A.

It is also possible to consult the notice of vacancy on the Council's website at:

http:/www.consilium.europa.eu/concours

The deadline for submitting applications is 19 September 2008, the postmark serving as proof.

19 September 2008

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KEVIN RAMON GRAY

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 103

- CR

Appeal from the

372 nd District Court

of Ta rran t County

, Texas

(TC# 1320429D )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Ap p ellant ’ s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until November 4

, 2014

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLANT ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. J

. Warren St. John , the Appellant ’s Attorney, prepare

the State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 4 , 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8 th day of October , 2014

.

PER CURIAM
# C_2008100EN.01002001.xml

| 22.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/20

---

Call for proposals for actions in the field of eco-innovation under the ‘Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme’ (CIP, Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council — OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p. 15)

(2008/C 100/08)

The Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation (EACI) is hereby launching a call for proposals for CIP ‘Eco-innovation pilot and market replication projects’. The call is closing on 11 September 2008.

Information on the modalities of the call and guidance to proposers on how to submit projects, is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/etap/ecoinnovation/library_en.htm

The helpdesk can be reached on:

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/etap/ecoinnovation/contact_en.htm

---
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa A. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:   (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Teresa A. Herbert
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
August 9, 2007   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   1
No. 56095.

protest 173925-K (New York).

#### L. Mendelson Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000097452
<NAME> TEXAS GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             725
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               205,070
<PP&E>                                         966,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,293,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,794
<BONDS>                                        253,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     683,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,293,429
<SALES>                                         10,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,939
<CGS>                                           10,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,709
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,850
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### John Hudson Moore, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6370.

Entry No. 762150, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, March 17, 1941, etc.

Certified April 4, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 14, 1941, etc.

(Decided September 20, 1946)

*Jordan*<fc *Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on .entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2007269EN.01001201.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/12

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands)) — Staat der Nederlanden v Antroposana, Patiëntenvereniging voor Antroposofische Gezondheidszorg, Nederlandse Vereniging van Antroposofische Artsen, Weleda Nederland NV, Wala Nederland NV,

(Case C-84/06) (1)

1

(Community code relating to medicinal products for human use - Articles 28 EC and 30 EC - Registration and marketing authorisation - Anthroposophic medicinal products)

(2007/C 269/23)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staat der Nederlanden

Applicant:

Defendants: Antroposana, Patiëntenvereniging voor Antroposofische Gezondheidszorg, Nederlandse Vereniging van Antroposofische Artsen, Weleda Nederland NV, Wala Nederland NV

Defendants:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67) — Marketing authorisation for anthroposophic medicinal products which are not homeopathic medicinal products within the meaning of Chapter 2 of Title III of the directive — National legislation which makes anthroposophic medicinal products subject to the conditions set out in Chapter 1 of Title III of the directive — Articles 28 EC and 30 EC.

Operative part of the judgment

Anthroposophic medicinal products may be marketed only on condition that they have been authorised under one of the procedures referred to in Article 6 of Directive 2001/83 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C.
§1350








| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and 2. the
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Corporation.





| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Dominic J. Pileggi               
| |                                      
| | Dominic J. Pileggi                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
|
| | /s/ Kenneth W. Fluke                 
| |                                      
| | Kenneth W. Fluke                     
| | Senior Vice President and            
| | Chief Executive Officer
No. 53690.

protests 132381-K, etc. (New York).

#### Citrus & Allied Essential Oils Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mandarin oil similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fritzsche Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 56576.

protest 171240-K (New York).

#### Gat Cheung Co. v. United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vegetables similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 55731, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 56076.

protests 165737-K, 169601-K, and 170103-K (New York).

#### B. Shackman & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of paper boxes the same in all material respects as those the subject of *B. Shackman & Co.*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 111, C. D. 1309), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 9,168a.

#### MARTIN v. CLARK.

[Hempst. 259.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Arkansas.

July, 1834.

PLEADING AT LAW — TRESPASS—WARRANT—NEW Tkiai,.

1. In trespass, any matter done by virtue o£ a warrant, must be specially pleaded.

2. A new trial will not be granted, because witnesses did not state facts which the party expected they would state.

Appeal from the Crawford circuit court

[Action by William Martin against Josiah Clark.]

Before CROSS and LACY, JJ.

CROSS, J.

The record in this case presents two questions for consideration: First, whether the court erred in excluding an execution offered in evidence by the defendant; and second, in refusing to grant a new trial.

1. Clark brought an action of trespass against Martin, and the cause was tried on the plea of not guilty. In trespass the rule is, that any matter done by virtue of a warrant or authority, must in general be specially pleaded. Co. Litt. 282b, 283a; 6 Com. Dig. “Pleader,” E 17; 1 Salk. 107, 108; Doug. 611; 1 Saund. 298, note 1; 1 Chit. Pl. 538; 13 Johns. 443. The evidence was not admissible under the general issue.

2. The ground stated in the application for a new trial is, that two witnesses summoned by Clark did know, and were fully informed, that the property in controversy had been taken out of the possession of Clark and sold to Martin, and probably delivered to him; and that he, Martin, believed those witnesses would swear the truth in relation thereto; but that on the trial they either forgot the facts, or corruptly and wilfully refused to state them, and therefore that he did not have the benefit of a fair trial. This did not entitle Martin to a new trial, and his motion was rightfully overruled. Sayer, 27; 2 Caines, 129; 3 Johns. 256; 4 Johns. 425; 5 Johns. 259. Judgment affirmed.
No. 50602.

#### Protest 87989-K of Erwin Weiseles (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New .York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# A Man who shoots up can be very giving; he can give you and your baby AIDS

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  A Man who shoots up can be very giving; he can give you and your baby AIDS 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Institute on Drug Abuse, Department of Health and Human Services 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shows a pregnant woman.Shows a pregnant hispanic woman. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 43 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018217671.jpg; 018217671.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ALVIN T. SCOTT, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

16 USCMA 478, 37 CMR 98

No. 19,579

January 6, 1967

*Cwptain Stephen Arinson*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief were *Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Captain James A. Buttry,*and *Captain Frank J. Martin, Jr.*

*Captain Maurice Jay Kutner*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Colonel Peter S. Wondolowski, Lieutenant Colonel Francis M. Cooper,*and *Captain Richard J. Andriolo,*

*479Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused was tried by a general court-martial at Fort Benning, Georgia, on seven specifications alleging violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Five of the specifications were dismissed at the end of the Government’s case. However, the accused was convicted of assault and battery upon Private First Class Carl K. Dowdey, Jr., by striking him on the chest with his fist, and of assault with a means likely to produce grievous bodily harm upon the same person. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two years, a dishonorable discharge, and accessory penalties. The findings and sentence were approved on intermediate review.

On this appeal, the accused contends - the two offenses are not separate for sentence purposes, and the law officer should have instructed the -court-martial to that effect, rather than advise it, as he did, that the maximum punishment for each offense could be aggregated. The contention is based upon evidence in the record of trial tending to establish there was no material separation of time and circumstance between the two acts, so that they were merely parts of a single assault upon the victim. United States v Swigert, 8 USCMA 468, 24 CMR 278; United States v Ompad, 15 USCMA 593, 36 CMR 91. The Government concedes error, but maintains it was not prejudicial to the accused and that, in any event, the error was waived by the failure of defense counsel to object. We are not persuaded that either contention applies to this case. At trial, trial counsel relied upon both offenses in urging imposition of “a stern sentence.” The staff judge advocate also considered the “seriousness” of both offenses in his recommendation to the convening authority that he approve the sentence adjudged by the court-martial. Under the circumstances, we deem it appropriate that the sentence be reconsidered. United States v Schoenberg, 16 USCMA 425, 37 CMR 45.

The decision of the board of review as to the sentence is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for resubmission to the board of review for reassessment of the sentence, in light of this opinion.

Judges Ferguson and Kilday concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-cr-060

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

MARK F. KILBARGER, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On April 6, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Kilbarger’s guilty plea to Count

Two of the Information charging him with attempt to evade or defeat an income tax, in violation of

26 U.S.C. § 7201. Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter

before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion,

and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00060-GCS-NMK Doc #: 15 Filed: 05/01/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count Two of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

attempting to evade or defeat an income tax.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00060-GCS-NMK Doc #: 15 Filed: 05/01/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v. FRANCIS W. ANTONIO, Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

6 USCMA 167, 19 CMR 293

No. 6405

Decided July 15, 1955

*Lieutenant Colonel Harley A. Lanning*and *First Lieutenant Philip L. Evans*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Andrew D. Kane*was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

This case is controlled by United States v. Simone, 6 USCMA 146, 19 CMR 272; and United States v. Lugo, 6 USCMA 151, 19 CMR 277. We must hold, therefore, that the morning report entry extract copy before us sufficed to sustain the general court-martial’s finding that the accused’s desertion had been terminated by apprehension. It follows that the findings and sentence, as approved by intermediate appellate agencies, must be affirmed.