alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008078EN.01000102.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4841 — ENEL/EMS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 78/02)

On 20 December 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4841. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4841. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# C_2008233EN.01000801.xml

| 11.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 September 2008

(2008/C 233/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4094 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 150,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4574 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80200 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5115 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5928 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 129,01 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,850 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 241,39 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7045 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,4755 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6020 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,265 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7484 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7541 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5090 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9921 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1118 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0226 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 546,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3586 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6382 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1253 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 149,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8758 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,320 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,1515 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,822 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5159 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 14,9255 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4094

JPY

Japanese yen

150,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4574

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80200

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5115

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5928

ISK

Iceland króna

129,01

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,850

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

241,39

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7045

PLN

Polish zloty

3,4755

RON

Romanian leu

3,6020

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,265

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7484

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7541

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5090

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9921

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1118

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0226

KRW

South Korean won

1 546,11

ZAR

South African rand

11,3586

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6382

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1253

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 149,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8758

PHP

Philippine peso

66,320

RUB

Russian rouble

36,1515

THB

Thai baht

48,822

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5159

MXN

Mexican peso

14,9255

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
January 9, 1940

No. 43025.

#### Protest 927971-G of Lunham & Reeve, Inc.

C. D. 258. Application by plaintiff for rehearing denied.
Exhibit
No. 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the “Trust”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David M. Peterson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Trust, certifies, to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.




TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST(Registrant)Date:  May
      7, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      David M. PetersonDavid
      M. Peterson, Assistant General Agent and Chief Financial
      Officer
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# It's shocking! it's disgusting! it makes your hair stand on end! don't call it hands-on management! it's sexual harassment! let it go and you could create a monster!

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  It's shocking! it's disgusting! it makes your hair stand on end! don't call it hands-on management! it's sexual harassment! let it go and you could create a monster! 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 90-494-P. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. American Forces Information Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; #27; Defense billboard (1988) ; # 27. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Radiation Therapy Services Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written certification required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ DANIEL E. DOSORETZ, M.D. Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D. Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)March 11, 2011


---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2099
JOSH BILLINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-97-4) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Josh Billings, Appellant Pro Se. James Walter Hopper, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Josh Billings appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his action challenging Virginia’s election laws. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we grant Billings’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Billings v. Virginia , No. CA-98-97-4 (E.D. Va. July 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9199 

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Nuclear Energy Innovation 

and Modernization Act to limit the type of applications reviewed by 

the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards and to exclude reviews 

by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards from the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission’s annual assessment and collection of fees and 

charges. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. DONALDS (for himself, Mr. NEHLS, and Mr. WILLIAMS of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Nuclear 

Energy Innovation and Modernization Act to limit the 

type of applications reviewed by the Advisory Committee 

on Reactor Safeguards and to exclude reviews by the 

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards from the 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual assessment and 

collection of fees and charges. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9199 IH

1 SECTION 1. REVIEWS BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON 

2 REACTOR SAFEGUARDS. 

3 (a) LICENSE APPLICATIONS.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 182 b. of the Atomic 

5 Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2232(b)) is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘The Advisory Committee’’ and inserting 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Advisory Committee’’. 

9 (2) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—Section 182 of 

10 the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2232) is 

11 amended by inserting at the end of subsection b., as 

12 amended by paragraph (1), the following: 

13 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—With respect to 

14 the applications described in paragraph (1), the Ad15 visory Committee on Reactor Safeguards may only 

16 review such applications that present a novel issue 

17 or an issue of significant safety concern, based on a 

18 risk-informed determination by the Committee.’’. 

19 (b) FEES AND CHARGES.—Section 102(b)(1)(B) of 

20 the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (42 

21 U.S.C. 2215(b)(1)(B)) is amended by adding at the end 

22 the following: 

23 ‘‘(iv) Any review conducted by the Ad24 visory Committee on Reactor Safeguards 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9199 IH

1 under section 182 b. of the Atomic Energy 

2 Act of 1954.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION OF 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended August 31, 2003 (the Report), I, Richard M. Fowler, Executive Vice President-Finance of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Dated: October 14, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Texas Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Texas Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007199EN.01004801.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/48

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 July 2007 — Dethomas v Commission

(Case F-93/06) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Former member of the temporary staff - Appointment as an official - Amendment of the Staff Regulations of 1 May 2004 - Third paragraph of Article 32 of the Staff Regulations - Classification by step)

(2007/C 199/92)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bruno Dethomas (Rabat, Morocco) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: initially V. Joris and H. Kraemer, subsequently H. Kraemer alone)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission's decision of 11 January 2006, appointing the applicant, a member of the temporary staff classified in grade A1*14, step 8, as a probationary official of the European Communities, inasmuch as it fixes his classification in grade A*14, step 2.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 11 January 2006 inasmuch as it classifies Mr Dethomas, Head of the European Commission Delegation to the Kingdom of Morocco, in grade A*14, step 2; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 11 January 2006 inasmuch as it classifies Mr Dethomas, Head of the European Commission Delegation to the Kingdom of Morocco, in grade A*14, step 2;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 22.

1

---
# C_2008013EN.01000101.xml

| 18.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 January 2008

(2008/C 13/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4691 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4514 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,74615 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4097 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6144 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 95,57 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9540 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,128 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6985 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,6001 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6860 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,680 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7387 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6642 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5007 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4642 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9069 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1080 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 389,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,3314 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6488 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3380 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 863,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8135 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,866 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,9350 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,217 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5950 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0808 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4691

JPY

Japanese yen

157,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4514

GBP

Pound sterling

0,74615

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4097

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6144

ISK

Iceland króna

95,57

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9540

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,128

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6985

PLN

Polish zloty

3,6001

RON

Romanian leu

3,6860

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,680

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7387

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6642

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5007

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4642

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9069

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1080

KRW

South Korean won

1 389,47

ZAR

South African rand

10,3314

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6488

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3380

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 863,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8135

PHP

Philippine peso

59,866

RUB

Russian rouble

35,9350

THB

Thai baht

44,217

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5950

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0808

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Appendix C

Right-of-Way Information
A90A1241.

#### NOBLES v. THE STATE.

(394 SE2d 613)

Decided May 16, 1990

Rehearing denied May 24, 1990.

*Jackson & Schiavone, Michael G. Schiavone,*for appellant.

*Spencer Lawton, Jr., District Attorney, Barry Mortge, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Banke, Presiding Judge.

This case is before us on appeal from the denial of the appellant’s plea of former jeopardy. In a prior appearance of the case before this court, we reversed the appellant’s convictions of voluntary manslaughter and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony, based on a determination that the appellant’s in-custody statement should not have been admitted into evidence. *Nobles v. State,*191 Ga. App. 594 (1) (a) (382 SE2d 637) (1989). However, we expressly held that the remaining evidence was sufficient to support both convictions. Id. at 597 (1) (b), 599 (7). Upon the return of the case to the trial court, the appellant filed a “Plea and Motion in Autrefois and Plea of Former Jeopardy,” based on a contention that the latter holding was erroneous. The present appeal is from the denial of that motion. Contending that the appeal is frivolous and was interposed solely for the purpose of delay, the state has moved both for expedited consideration of the appeal and for its dismissal. *Held:*

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. However, the motion for expedited consideration of the appeal is granted. The prior holding of this court with respect to the sufficiency of the evidence was binding upon the trial court, which consequently did not err in denying the appellant’s plea of former jeopardy. Accord *Whitlock v. State,*230 Ga. 700, 702 (2) (198 SE2d 865) (1973). Cf. *Strickland v. State,*258 Ga. 764 (373 SE2d 736) (1988).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Birdsong and Cooper, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit No. 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Roy Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust,
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)               The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)              The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

| |  | TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST(Registrant)
| |  | ------------------------------------

|Date:  August 8, 2005 |  | By:/s/ Roy Thomas

   
  
Roy Thomas, General Agent and
   
  
Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 46277.

#### Protests 803703-G, etc., of Cambosco Scientific Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
MONTAVIOUS EUGENE KNIGHT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5668

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 6, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Jack M. Schemer, Judge.

Montavious Eugene Knight, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 58166.

protest 224064-K (New York).

#### S. A. Haram & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of herring similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 57760, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.