alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa A. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:   (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Teresa A. Herbert
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
Date: August 10, 2009   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     1
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50101 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CESAR PACILLAS-SANTA CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas

(EP-96-CR-711-DB)

- - - - - - - - - - September 9, 1997 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Cesar Pacillas-Santa Cruz appeals the sentence he received for

illegal reentry, arguing that the district court erred by

increasing his offense level b y 16 levels under U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.2(b)(2) because his prior felony was not"aggravated" as

defined by the Sentencing Guidelines. After Pacillas filed his

appeal, we decided United States v. Reyna-Espinosa

,

__ F.3d

__ (5th

Cir. July 11, 1997, No. 96 -40499), 1997 WL 385972, in which thedeterminative issue was raised and in which the Appellant

prevailed. In R eyna-Espinosa

, we held that courts "must look to

the felonies expressly enumerat ed in the Commentary for the

definition of aggravated felony under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2." I d

. at

*4. As the sentencing judge relied on 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43) --

rather than § 2L1.2(b)(2), comment. (n.7)

-- for the definition of

"aggravated felony," Pacillas's sentence is VACATED and the case is

REMANDED to the district court for resentencing in the light of

Reyna-Espinosa

.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00279-CR

Freddy Perez

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (1328962D)

December 10, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Anne Gardner____________

 Justice Anne Gardner
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Guoqiang Xin, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SinoTech Energy Limited (the Company);  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other


employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financialreporting.   Date:
March 31,   2011By:
/s/Guoqiang XinName:
Guoqiang XinTitle:
Chief Executive   Officer  2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9018 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9018

 To include in the National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention 
                and Interdiction certain best practices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2024

  Mr. Pappas (for himself and Mr. Buchanan) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To include in the National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention 
                and Interdiction certain best practices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Crimes Against Children Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR CHILD EXPLOITATION PREVENTION AND 
              INTERDICTION.

    Section 101(c) of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 (Public Law 
110-401) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(20) Plans for coordination with nonprofit organizations 
        and institutions of higher education with respect to the 
        prevention, study, promotion, and implementation of best 
        practices regarding preventing, identifying, and responding to 
        crimes against children (including physical abuse, sexual 
        abuse, abduction, sexual exploitation, and trafficking), and 
        provision of evidence-based guidance on how best to support 
        children who are victims of crimes, including cooperation and 
        collaboration with--
                    ``(A) nonprofit organizations dedicated to 
                supporting children who are victims of crimes; and
                    ``(B) institutions of higher education with 
                expertise in researching and training regarding crimes 
                against children.
            ``(21) Recommendations for Federal, State, local, and 
        tribal law enforcement agencies for the promotion and 
        implementation of best practices for the prevention and 
        identification of crimes against children, as well as how to 
        best respond to and support children who are victims of 
        crimes.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT 
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









To my knowledge, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 26, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tasty Baking Company.  In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference.








By:
/s/   Charles P. PizziCharles P. PizziPresident andChief Executive Officer













By:
/s/   Paul D. RidderPaul D. RidderSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
















Date:  May 6, 2011
NUMBER 13-18-00502-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

EX PARTE ADRIAN GARZA

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 430th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

This matter is before the Court because the reporter’s record has not been filed. 

The clerk’s record was filed on October 15, 2018. On October 19, 2018, the Clerk of the 

Court notified appellant’s retained counsel he had failed to request the reporter’s record 

and requested that he forward proof of compliance to the Court within ten days. Counsel 

has failed to file a response and the reporter’s record has not been filed. 

This situation requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further delay and 

to preserve the parties’ rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2). Accordingly, this appeal 
2

is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court.

Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given 

and conduct a hearing to determine: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this 

appeal; (2) whether appellant is indigent; (3) whether appellant is entitled to a free 

appellate record and appointed counsel due to his indigency; and (4) what steps are 

necessary to ensure the prompt preparation of a complete reporter’s record, and shall 

enter any orders required to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights. 

The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and recommendations, together 

with any orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a 

supplemental clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental 

reporter's record of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record 

and supplemental reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 

thirty days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

5th day of November, 2018.
No. 65662.

#### C. M. Lurch Food Prod. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 271034-K (Detroit).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 15.1

Han Kun Law Offices

Suite 906, Office Tower C1, Oriental Plaza

No. 1 East Chang An Ave.

Beijing 100738

The
Peoples Republic of China

Tel: (86 10) 8525 5500

Fax: (86 10) 8525 5511

Date: April 28,
2016

Bitauto Holdings Limited

New Century Hotel Office
Tower, 6/F

No. 6 South Capital Stadium Road

Beijing, 100044

The Peoples Republic of China

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the use of our name under the captions RISK FACTORS and MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS included in the Form 20-F, which will be filed by Bitauto Holdings Limited, on April 28, 2016, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the Annual Report), and further consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-171927) pertaining to the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
and the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-195428) pertaining to the 2012 Share Incentive Plan of Bitauto Holdings Limited of the summary of our opinion under the captions RISK FACTORS and
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS included in the Annual Report. We also consent to the filing of this consent letter with the SEC as an exhibit to the Annual Report.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Sincerely yours,       
|                       
|/s/ Han Kun Law Offices
# C_2008187EN.01001301.xml

| 24.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/13

---

Calls for proposals under the 2009 Ideas work programme of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

(2008/C 187/06)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of calls for proposals under the 2009 Ideas work programme of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following calls. Call deadlines and budgets are given in the call texts, which are published on the CORDIS website.

Ideas Programme:

| Call Title | Call Identifier |
| --- | --- |
| ERC Starting Independent Researcher Grants | ERC-2009-StG |
| ERC CSA (Supporting Action) | ERC-2009-Support |

Call Title

Call Identifier

ERC Starting Independent Researcher Grants

ERC-2009-StG

ERC CSA (Supporting Action)

ERC-2009-Support

These calls for proposals relate to the work programme adopted by Commission Decisions C(2008) 3673 of 23 July 2008.

Information on the modalities of the calls, the work programme, and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website:

http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 120 (Monday, June 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 35629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14598]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8774]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Horse''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Horse,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural 
significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with 
the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the exhibit object at the Natural History Museum of Utah, 
Salt Lake City, UT, from on or about July 21, 2014, until on or about 
January 4, 2015; Museum at Prairiefire, Overland Park, KS, from on or 
about September 5, 2015, until on or about January 10, 2016, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: June 16, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-14598 Filed 6-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Order entered February 3, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00191-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, KARL- THOMAS MUSSELMAN, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 15, 2014 motion to increase the word limit of his 

reply brief. Appellant seeks to increase the 7,500 word limit allowed for computer-generated 

reply briefs and the 27,000 word limit allowed for all computer-generated briefs filed by a party 

by up to 12,500 words. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(B),(C). We note we previously granted 

appellant leave to file an initial brief of 19,500 words, 4,500 words more than the rules of 

appellate procedure allow for an initial brief. See id. 9.4(i)(2)(B). Accordingly, we GRANT 

appellant’s motion to the extent that appellant’s reply brief be no more than 9,500 words. We 

STRIKE appellant’s 19,900-word reply brief, filed January 23, 2014 while this motion was 

pending, and ORDER appellant to file an amended reply brief no later than February 17, 2014. 
No extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-176566) on Form S-4 of Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc. of our report dated May 14, 2012, with respect to the combined balance sheet of Moncla Coil Tubing Well Services, L.L.C., Moncla Pressure Pumping Well Services, L.L.C., and MW Services Transportation LLC as of March 2, 2011, and the related combined statements of operations, member's equity, and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2011 to March 2, 2011, which report appears in the December 31, 2011 special report on Form 10-K of Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Houston, Texas


May 14, 2012
# C_2008067EN.01005801.xml

| 12.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/58

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5048 — Ingersoll Rand/Trane)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 67/10)

| 1. | On 3 March 2008, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Ingersoll-Rand Company Ltd (‘IR’, Bermudas) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Trane Inc. (‘Trane’, USA) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 3 March 2008, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Ingersoll-Rand Company Ltd (‘IR’, Bermudas) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Trane Inc. (‘Trane’, USA) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for IR: refrigeration equipment, industrial technologies, security products, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for IR: refrigeration equipment, industrial technologies, security products,

| — | for Trane: air conditioning equipment and services. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Trane: air conditioning equipment and services.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5048 — Ingersoll Rand/Trane, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5048 — Ingersoll Rand/Trane, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

November 28, 1951

No. 56085.

protests 108010-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Alpha Distributing Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.