alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 1 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 2 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 3 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 4 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 5 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 6 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 7 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 8 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 9 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 10 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 11 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 12 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 13 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 14 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 15 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 16 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/26/12 Page: 17 of 17  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T17:28:40-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# C_2007297EN.01003504.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/35

---

Order of the President of the Court of 30 July 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-159/07) (1)

1

(2007/C 297/70)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 117, 26.5.2007.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dorothy M. Ables, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Duke Energy Gas Transmission Services, LLC, General Partner of Texas Eastern, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Texas Eastern.



|Date: August 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Dorothy M. Ables                             
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | Dorothy M. Ables                                 
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  | Duke Energy Gas Transmission Services, LLC       
|                      |  | General Partner of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP



18
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas C. OConnor, President of Duke Energy Gas Transmission Services, LLC, General Partner of Texas Eastern, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Texas Eastern.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                                          
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Thomas C. OConnor                                                                                                
|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                                          
|                   |  |  |  | Thomas C. OConnor President Duke Energy Gas Transmission Services, LLC General Partner of Texas Eastern
Transmission, LP



15
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Landsat 1, 2 & 3 coverage index; Landsat 4 coverage index

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Landsat 1, 2 & 3 coverage index; Landsat 4 coverage index 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  NOAA 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  143 × 55 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  PostersMaps 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  index.cpd 

Part of: Landsat 1, 2 & 3 coverage index; Landsat 4 coverage index (2 objects)     Next

Landsat 1, 2 & 3 coverage index; Landsat 4 coverage index

Landsat 1, 2 & 3 coverage index; Landsat 4 coverage index

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Retention Bonus Letter Agreement between the Company and Amar Singh



 Exhibit 10.3 
 May 19, 2008 
 Amar Singh 
 [Address] 

 

	 	Re:	Retention Bonus  

 Dear Amar: 
 Novacea, Inc. (the “Company”) agrees to make a retention payment to you (a “Retention Bonus”) in an amount equal to 6 months of your
base salary. The payment of your Retention Bonus will be made upon the completion of a Transaction by the Company, subject to your continued employment by the Company through that date. A Transaction is defined as a transaction that has the effect
of the Company becoming reengaged in operating activities (either through a merger, acquisition or the in-licensing of a new compound, and/or the reintroducing of Asentar or AQ4N into active clinical development) or the Company being liquidated. In
addition, if you are terminated by the Company without cause prior to a Transaction but on or after the date the Company enters into a definitive agreement that contemplates a merger, acquisition or liquidation, the Company agrees to pay to you the
Retention Bonus within 30 days of your termination. 
 Thank you for all of your contributions to Novacea. 
  

	
	Best regards,
	
	/s/ John P. Walker
	John P. Walker
	Chief Executive Officer
	Novacea, Inc.


 By signing below, I acknowledge receipt of this letter and agree to its terms and conditions. 
  

					
			
	/s/ Amar Singh	 		 	6/3/08
	Amar Singh	 		 	Date
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135002 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135002 

 COA: 279315 

Kent CC: 06-004052-FH 

CARL MICHAEL SCOTT-PARKIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
No. 51140.

#### Protests 41984-K, etc., of Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exporta*290tion (the "free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the ederal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The notests were sustained to this extent.
# C_2008255EN.01000202.xml

| 8.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5255 — TDK/Epcos)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 255/04)

On 15 September 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5255. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5255. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### W. H. S. Lloyd Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6356.

Entry No. 724630, etc.

Invoices dated Perivale, Greenford, England, September 15, 1941, etc.

Certified September 16, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 14, 1941, etc.

(Decided September 19, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges (Radley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule' A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section *309402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1



TECO ENERGY, INC



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Each of the
undersigned officers of TECO Energy, Inc. (the Company) certifies, under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: November 13, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ R. D. FaganRobert D. Fagan Chief Executive
Officer
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: November 13, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ G. L. GilletteGordon L. Gillette Chief Financial
Officer
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TECO Energy, Inc. and will be retained by TECO Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         4083627
<SECURITIES>                                   5255507
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4616931
<ALLOWANCES>                                    195537
<INVENTORY>                                    4919232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              19240438
<PP&E>                                        14084503
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8271967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                26129697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3784556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         41205
<OTHER-SE>                                    20262674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  26129697
<SALES>                                       13476929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              13476929
<CGS>                                          7922688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3486793
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2158084
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1298384
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1298384
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7432** 

CHARLES ANDRAE GRAYTON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

– Appellee , and DIRECTOR WILLIAM BYARS, Department of Corrections , Respondent
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 8:11

- cv - 002576

- CMC )

Submitted : December 20 , 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012

Before KING and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Charles Andrae Grayton, Appellant Pro Se. James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appell ee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Charles Andrae Grayton seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabilit y. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sa tisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Grayton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal4 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
July 14, 1972

No. 72-28

#### Edward J. Denton, III, CE3, U. S. Navy v CDR James D. Kirkpatrick, USN, Commanding Officer, Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 74, FPO New York 09501; RADM Nowell G. Ward, USN, Commandant, Tenth Naval District, FPO New York 09550; and CAPT Lloyd T. Brown, USN, Commanding Officer, U. S. Naval Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

On consideration of the “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, and Other Extraordinary Relief” filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that all matters set forth therein are more appropriately the *659subjects of motions addressed to and decided by the military judge if and when the charges against petitioner are referred to a court-martial, and it further appearing that no relief which petitioner seeks from this Court would be in aid of our jurisdiction (See, 10 USC § 1651 (a)), it is, by the Court, this 14th day of July 1972,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  I, Peter Reichard, President and Director of Europa Acquisition VII, Inc., (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
  (1) The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
/s/ Peter ReichardPeter ReichardPresident and Director(Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer)
 
 Date: October 31, 2011
    
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.