Report ofNOx Removal Measurements from an SNCR System 

at the St. Mary's Cement Dixon IL Facility 

Prepared By: 

De-NOX Technologies, LLC 

22 Partridge Lane 

East Hampstead, NH 03 826 

OCT 2005 
INTRODUCTION 

StMary's Cement Company operates three preheater-type kilns and one long-dry kiln in 

Dixon, IL. The Company contracted with De-NOx Technologies to evaluate the 

effectiveness of an SNCR system for reducing NOx emissions at one of the preheater 

units. Testing was conducted during the week of 03 October. 

The test apparatus consisted of multiple 500 gallon IBC's to store 19 wt% ammonia, 

DNT's dual fluid reagent atomi:dng injectors, a portable pump skid, compressed air 

control system, reagent distribution assembly, and various hoses in lieu of permanent 

piping. The pump skid contained flow meters to measure reagent flow. A portable gas 

analyzer was used to measure NOx reduction performance. 

SNCR requires injection of either ammonia or urea into the kiln gas at just the right 

temperature to react with NOx to form N2. Proper reagent atomization is also critical to 

assure complete dispersion and mixing with the NO molecule. The reaction requires a 

temperature of 1600 - 2000 degF, in the presence of oxygen. 

The predominant ammonia-based reaction is described as follows: 

AMMONIA+ NITROGEN OXIDE +OXYGEN NITROGEN+ WATER 

A simplified flow sheet of this facility is provided in Figure 1. There is no bypass, 

secondary air, or supplemental firing. The gas exiting the kiln flows up through a series 

of four cyclone/preheaters. The three preheated kilns are combined into a common stack. 
TEST SCOPE Al~D METHODOLOGY 

The objectives of the test were threefold: 

I. Optimize injection location and settings. 

2. Generate stoichiometric performance curves, and 

3. Generate continuous run data 

Reagent was injected in three vertical riser locations- hereinafter referred to as Upper, 

Middle and Lower. In all cases, the cross-sectional area of the duct was suitable for, at 

most, two injectors. Existing inspection doors wer~ """'odified with ports for the injectors 

-in general the doors were located toward the comers ofthe duct with the ports angled to 

the center as much as possible. 

The time delay between the point of injection and reaction on the portable gas analyzer 

was less than one _minute. As such, rapid data collection was possible. In general, the 

gas analyzer probe was inserted for approximately 30 seconds - at which point the data 

was stable- and an instantaneous data point taken by printer. 

Baseline NOx datapoints were taken after every 2 or 3 test runs. Reagent flows of 0.25, 

0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 GPM were repeated to allow generation of performance curves. 

-.. '· 
TEST RESULTS 

The summarized data is presented in Table 1 and Figures 2 and 3. 

The Upper Test Location had excellent results. Approximately 65% reduction was 

demonstrated at an NSR (molar ratio of ammonia to unabated NOx) of 1.0. Another way 

to look at this simplified statistic is that 65% of the reagent was utilized in the SNCR 

reaction with the other 35% lost to other ends (either: 1) unreacted ammonia slip gas, 2) 

reacted with SOX or solids, or 3) oxidized to NOx and then subsequently reduced to 

N2.). 

The Middle and Lower Test Locations had even better results. Approximately 80-85% 

reduction was demonstrated at an NSR of 1.0. Below 70% reduction, NOx reduction 

closely approaches perfect chemical efficiency- which is also translated to mean that 

ammonia slip to the lowest cyclone will be non-detectable and that overall chemical cost 

will be lowest. Clinker build-up is more prevalent in the lower riser. Such 

accumulations would have a detrimental effect on the SNCR injectors - either by 

slagging over/around the injectors or by physical damage from falling clinker. For these 

reasons, injectors should be located in the Middle Riser. 

Excellent results at this facility can be explained by the near perfect SNCR conditions in 

the riser. Main burner combustion is very good- evidenced by low CO in the riser (200 

ppmv). The absence of"combustion-like" conditions in the riser keeps oxidation of 

a.11monia low. The residence time in the riser is also adequate - and begins to simulate , 

laboratory pipe-flow-apparatus conditions- as evidenced by the improvement going to··. 

the Middle location but no improvement going to the Lower location. 

Another interesting conclusion is that the ammonia has no apparent interaction with 

sulfur compounds in the riser. Given that S02 in the riser is approximately 2500 ppmv, 

if ammonia was consumed by reaction with sulfur compounds, it would have reduced the 

chemical efficiency of the SNCR reaction. This is not to say that such a reaction would 

not occur at the lower operating temperatures higher up in the tower, but that it does not 

occur at kiln outlet temperatures. 

Table 1 has the Raw and Summarized data. 

Figure 2 is a Chart of the unitless factors NSR- vs-% Nox Reduction 

Figure 3 is a Chart of GPM - vs - % NOx Reduction 
CONCLUSIONS 

The following is concluded: 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Performance was outstanding. NOx reductions in excess of 50% can be reliably 

achieved at a reagent flow rate of 0.5 GPM per unit. 

The Middle and Lower injection locations demonstrated similar performance, and 

superior to the Upper location. Considering the prevalence for clinker to build-up 

in the lower elevations, the Middle Riser ports are recommended for permanent 

installation. 

System chemical efficiency was also excellent. Near-zero ammonia slip can be 

expected to exit the Stage IV (lowest) cyclone up to approximately 60% NOx 

reduction. 

Dixon should be aware that supplemental fuel firing in the riser will adversely 

effect NOx reduction. 
--------------------------- -

FEED 

~--------------~ I 

I I 

I \ 

\ I 

I 

I 

I \ 

I 

\ 

\ 

\ 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

\ 

\ 

I \ I 

I 

\ 

I 

I 

l 

~ 

I 

{ 

\ 

I 

\ 

l 

\ 

UPPER I 

\ 

I 

I TEST LOCATIONS I 

\ 

\ 

\ 

I 

CEM \ 

MIDDLE \ 

I 

I 

I 

I 

\ 

\ 

I 

I 

" 

LDV!ER \ 

TO lD FAN 

l 

I 

I 

I 

FIGURE 1 

DIXON SIMPLIFIED 

PROCESS FLD\rJ 
""': 

.... a> .... a> =o a> c.. "0 5 c.. ~ 0 :::> _l 

c c c 0 0 0 X X X 

0 0 0 

• * "! 
>< 

0 

z 

0 ~ 

I 

Ill 

> I 

D.. == (.!) 

z 

0 

>< 5 

M 

(.!) 

u:: 

0 

0 

N 

0 

1.0 

0 

0 

~ 

0 

1.0 

0 

0 

0 

ooooooooooo 0 

00>001'-<.0LO-.;:tMN~ 

~ 

XQNo/o 

~ 

a. 

C) 

/' 
Gas Moisture 14 % / Stack Gas Flo 28,000 wscfm I TABLE 1 

NH3 Density/ 0.934 SG Oct 2005 Dixon SNCR Testing 

NH3Conc I 19 wt% 

Assumed/

1 

Baseline Baseline 

Reagent Downcome Baseline Assumed sorn NH3 NOx NOx Overall 

Meter NO NO Baseline Corrected Mass Flow Mol Flow scfm mol/hr % % Location 

StartTime GPM ppmd ppmd · co co GPM lb/hr mollhr NSR NOx co I. ppm ppm Reduction Change 

I 

9:48 1 220' 1023 206 212 1.03 481.5 5.4 26.6 4.5 1.21 76 -3 Upper Riser 19% ammonia 

9:56 1 206 1023 228 212 1.03 481.5 5.4 28.6 4.5 1.21 80 8 2nozzles 

10:09 1.5 173 1034 214 210 1.55 722.2 8.1 29.0 4.5 1.79 83 2 

10:16 0.5 576 1034 219 210 0.52 240.7 2.7 29.0 4.5 0.60 44 4 

10:16 1 267 956 221 222 1.03 461.5 5.4 26.8 4.2 1.29 70 0 

10:24 0.5 595 956 216 222 0.52 240.7 2.7 26.6 4.2 0.65 36 -2 

10:28 1 299 1099 207 202 1.03 481.5 5.4 30.6 4.6 1.13 73 2 

10:34 1.5 172 1099 205 202 1.55 722.2 6.1 30.8 4.6 1.69 64 1 

10:37 0.5 467 1033 180 206 0.52 240.7 2.7 28.9 4.5 0.60 53 -13 

10:42 1 259 1033 196 206 1.03 461.5 5.4 28.9 4.5 1.20 75 -5 

10:45 0.5 586 1064 196 201 0.52 240.7 2.7 30.4 4.7 0.57 46 -2 

12:59 0.75 452 1088 197 204 0.77 361.1 4.0 30.5 4.7 0.85 58 -3 

13:05 0.75 333 1020 192 177 0.77 361.1 4.0 28.6 4.4 0.91 67 8.5 

13:10 0.75 363 1020 0.77 361.1 4.0 28.6 4.4 0.91 64 

13:16 0.75 435 991 0.77 361.1 4.0 27.7 4.3 0.94 56 

10:49 0.5 595 1064 203 201 0.52 240.7 2.7 30.4 4.7 0.57 45 1 lnj#1 Only 

10:52 0.5 598 1064 197 201 0.52 240.7 2.7 30.4 4.7 0.57 45 -2 lnj#2 Only 

10:56 0.5 594 936 183 181 0.52 240.7 2.7 26.2 4.1 0.66 3'/ 1 lnj #20nly 

10:59 0.5 464 936 199 181 0.52 240.7 2.7 26.2 4.1 0.66 50 10 lnj#1 Only 

13:20 0.25 649 1025 0.26 120.4 1.3 28.7 4.5 0.30 37 

•13:59 1 223 ,-1,@()_ .. ·.; .. ' -247 284 ,1._03_ . 48,.5 .5.4 30.2 4.7 1.14 79 -13 Middle Riser 

14:63 1 102 1026 "• 298 236 1.03 481.5 5.4 28.7 4.5 1.21 90 26 2 nozzles 

14:06 0.5 455 1152 213 269 0.52 240.7 2.7 32.3 5.0 0.54 61 -21 

14:10 0.5 491 1152 298 269 0.52 240.7 2.7 32.3 5.0 0.54 57 11 

14:12 0.75 195 1034 305 300 0.77 . 361.1 4.0 29.0 4.5 0.90 81 2 

14:16 0.75 248 1034 286 300 0.77 361.1 4.0 29.0 4.5 0.90 76 -5 

14:19 1 68 1064 291 304 1.03 481.5 5.4 29.8 4.6 1.16 94 -4 

14:23 0.5 456 1064 251 304 0.52 240.7 2.7 29.8 4.6 0.58 57 -17 

14:27 0.25 865 1063 265 215 0.26 120.4 1.3 29.3 4.6 0.29 19 23 left lnj Only 

14:31 0.25 764 1063 274 215 0.26 120.4 1.3 29.8 4.6 0.29 26 27 left lnj Only 

14:33 0.25 768 1116 166 236 0.26 120.4 1.3 31.2 4.9 0.28 31 -20 Right lnj Only 

15:38 1 30 1038 293 233 1.03 481.5 5.4 29.1 4.5 1.19 97 26 Lower Riser 

15:48 0.5 500 1012 301 291 0.52 240.7 2.7 28.3 4.4 0.61 51 3 2 nozzles 

15:48 0.75 173 1021 315 285 0.77 361.1 4.0 28.6 4.4 0.91 83 11 

15:53 0.5 471 1021 293 285 0.52 240.7 2.7 28.6 4.4 0.61 54 3 

15:55 0.75 192 1010 314 270 0.77 361.1 4.0 28.3 4.4 0.92 61 16 

16:00 1 56 1010 299 270 1.03 481.5 5.4 28.3 4.4 1.22 94 11 

16:03 0.5 362 1044 319 293 0.52 240.7 2.7 29.2 4.5 0,59 63 9 One Injector 

16:07 0.5 362 1044 267 293 0.52 240.7 2.7 29.2 4.5 0.59 65 -2 One Injector 

16:10 0.75 129 991 302 304 0.77 361.'-f 4.0 27.7 4.3 0.94 67 -1 One Injector 

16:15 0.25 676 991 295 304 0.26 126:4 1.3 27.7 4.3 0.31 32 -3 One Injector 

16:18 0.25 724 991 305 304 0.26 120.4 1.3 27.7 4.3 0.31 27 0 One Injector 
• ST MARYS CEMENT INC. (U.S.) ~YlARYS 

CERTIFIED MAIL NO 7005 0390 0000 6162 4966 

Return Receipt Requested 

April 26, 2006 

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

Compliance Section (#40) 

P.O. Box 19276 

Springfield, IL 62794-9276 

RE: SNCR Pilot Test 

Application No. 05080006, ID No. 103806AAC 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

St Marys Cement Inc. (U.S.) 

Dixon Plant 

1914 White Oak Lane 

P.O. Box468 

Dixon, illinois 

61021 USA 

815-284-3357 

: ,~·: ~' -' '- __;' _, ~"«" 

On October 12, 2005, St. Marys Cement, Inc. (SMC) received authorization to conduct 

pilot testing for Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) at the Dixon, Illinois plant. 

The pilot testing was performed in two phases; iterative testing and long-term testing. 

The iterative testing was performed to determine the optimal injection location and rate 

whereas the long-term testing was performed to confirm the iterative results and 

determine any process implications. Pilot testing for SNCR under the above referen'ced 

permit has concluded at the Dixon plant, effective the date of this submittal. Therefore, 

in accordance with the above referenced permit, SMC is submitting the attached reports 

detailing the findings of the SNCR pilot test project. The report for the iterative testing is 

included as Attachment A. The long-term testing report is included as Attachment B. 

If you have any questions regarding the SNCR pilot study, please contact me at 815-284-

3357, ext. 118. 

Sincerely, 

ST. MARYS CEMENT, INC. 

cc: IEPA/DAPC Peoria CERTIFIED MAIL NO 7005 0390 0000 6162 4973 

USEPA Region V CERTIFIED MAIL NO 7005 0390 0000 6162 4980 

www.stmaryscement.com 
ATTACHMENT A 

ITERATIVE TEST RESULTS 
Report of NOx Removal Measurements from an SNCR System 

at the St. Mary's Cement Dixon IL Facility 

Prepared By: 

De-NOX Technologies, LLC 

22 Partridge Lane 

East Hampstead, NH 03 826 

OCT 2005 
INTRODUCTION 

St.Mary's Cement Company operates three preheater-type kilns and one long-dry kiln in 

Dixon, IL. The Company contracted with De-NOx Technologies to evaluate the 

effectiveness of an SNCR system for reducing NOx emissions at one of the preheater 

units. Testing was conducted during the week of 03 October. 

The test apparatus consisted ofmultiple 500 gallon IBC's to store 19 wt% ammonia, 

DNT's dual fluid reagent atomizing injectors, a portable pump skid, compressed air 

control system, reagent distribution assembly, and various hoses in lieu of permanent 

piping. The pump skid contained flow meters to measure reagent flow. A portable gas 

analyzer was used to measure NOx reduction performance. 

SNCR requires injection of either ammonia or urea into the kiln gas at just the right 

temperature to react with NOx to form N2. Proper reagent atomization is also critical to 

assure complete dispersion and mixing with the NO molecule. The reaction requires a 

temperature of 1600 - 2000 degF, in the presence of oxygen. 

The predominant ammonia-based reaction is described as follows: 

AMMONIA +NITROGEN OXIDE + OXYGEN NITROGEN+ WATER 

A simplified flow sheet of this facility is provided in Figure 1. There is no bypass, 

secondary air, or supplemental firing. The gas exiting the kiln flows up through a series 

of four cyclone/preheaters. The three preheated kilns are combined into a common stack. 
TEST SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 

The objectives of the test were threefold: 

1. Optimize injection location and settings. 

2. Generate stoichiometric performance curves, and 

3. Generate continuous run data 

Reagent was injected in three vertical riser locations - hereinafter referred to as Upper, 

Middle and Lower. In all cases, the cross-sectional area of the duct was suitable for, at 

most, two injectors. Existing inspection doors were modified with ports for the injectors 

- in general the doors were located toward the corners of the duct with the ports angled to 

the center as much as possible. 

The time delay between the point of injection and reaction on the portable gas analyzer 

was less than one minute. As such, rapid data collection was possible. In general, the 

gas analyzer probe was inserted for approximately 30 seconds - at which point the data 

was stable- and an instantaneous data point taken by printer. 

Baseline NOx datapoints were taken after every 2 or 3 test runs. Reagent flows of0.25, 

0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 GPM were repeated to allow generation of performance curves. 
TEST RESULTS 

The summarized data is presented in Table 1 and Figures 2 and 3. 

The Upper Test Location had excellent results. Approximately 65% reduction was 

demonstrated at an NSR (molar ratio of ammonia to unabated NOx) of 1.0. Another way 

to look at this simplified statistic is that 65% of the reagent was utilized in the SNCR 

reaction with the other 35% lost to other ends (either: 1) unreacted ammonia slip gas, 2) 

reacted with SOX or solids, or 3) oxidized to NOx and then subsequently reduced to 

N2.). 

The Middle and Lower Test Locations had even better results. Approximately 80-85% 

reduction was demonstrated at an NSR of 1.0. Below 70% reduction, NOx reduction 

closely approaches perfect chemical efficiency - which is also translated to mean that 

ammonia slip to the lowest cyclone will be non-detectable and that overall chemical cost 

will be lowest. Clinker build-up is more prevalent in the lower riser. Such 

accumulations would have a detrimental effect on the SNCR injectors- either by 

slagging over/around the injectors or by physical damage from falling clinker. For these 

reasons, injectors should be located in the Middle Riser. 

Excellent results at this facility can be explained by the near perfect SNCR conditions in 

the riser. Main burner combustion is very good - evidenced by low CO in the riser (200 

ppmv). The absence of"combustion-like" conditions in the riser keeps oxidation of 

ammonia low. The residence time in the riser is also adequate - and begins to simulate' 

laboratory pipe-flow-apparatus conditions - as evidenced by the improvement going to 

the Middle location but no improvement going to the Lower location. 

Another interesting conclusion is that the ammonia has no apparent interaction with 

sulfur compounds in the riser. Given that S02 in the riser is approximately 2500 ppmv, 

if ammonia was consumed by reaction with sulfur compounds, it would have reduced the 

chemical efficiency of the SNCR reaction. This is not to say that such a reaction would 

not occur at the lower operating temperatures higher up in the tower, but that it does not 

occur at kiln outlet temperatures. 

Table 1 has the Raw and Summarized data. 

Figure 2 is a Chart of the unitless factors NSR- vs - % Nox Reduction 

Figure 3 is a Chart of GPM- vs - % NOx Reduction 
CONCLUSIONS 

The following is concluded: 

• Performance was outstanding. NOx reductions in excess of 50% can be reliably 

achieved at a reagent flow rate of 0.5 GPM per unit. 

• The Middle and Lower injection locations demonstrated similar performance, and 

superior to the Upper location. Considering the prevalence for clinker to build-up 

in the lower elevations, the Middle Riser ports are recommended for permanent 

installation. '· 

• System chemical efficiency was also excellent. Near-zero ammonia slip can be 

expected to exit the Stage IV (lowest) cyclone up to approximately 60% NOx 

reduction. 

• Dixon should be aware that supplemental fuel firing in the riser will adversely 

effect NOx reduction. 
Gas Moisture 14% 

Stack Gas Flo 28,000 wscfm TABLE 1 

NH3 Density 0.934 SG Oct 2005 Dixon SNCR Testing 

NH3 Cone 19 wt% "'~--

Assumed Baseline Baseline 

Reagent DowncomE Baseline Assumed Sol'n NH3 NOx NOx Overall 

Meter NO NO Baseline Corrected Mass Flow Mol Flow scfm mol/hr % % Location 

Start Time GPM ppmd ppmd co co GPM lblhr mollhr NSR NOx co ppm ppm Reduction Change 

9:48 220 1023 206 212 1.03 481.5 5.4 28.6 4.5 1.21 78 -3 Upper Riser 19% ammonia 

9:58 206 1023 228 212 1.03 481.5 5.4 28.6 4.5 1.21 80 8 2nozzles 

10:09 1.5 173 1034 214 210 1.55 722.2 8.1 29.0 4.5 1.79 83 2 

10:16 0.5 576 1034 219 210 0.52 240.7 2.7 29.0 4.5 0.60 44 4 

10:18 1 287 956 221 222 1.03 481.5 5.4 26.8 4.2 1.29 70 0 

10:24 0.5 595 956 218 222 0.52 240.7 2.7 26.8 4.2 0.65 38 -2 

10:28 1 299 1099 207 202 1.03 481.5 5.4 30.8 4.8 1.13 73 2 

10:34 1.5 172 1099 205 202 1.55 722.2 8.1 30.8 4.8 1.69 84 1 

10:37 0.5 487 1033 180 208 0.52 240.7 2.7 28.9 4.5 0.60 53 -13 

10:42 1 259 1033 198 208 1.03 481.5 5.4 28.9 4.5 1.20 75 -5 

10:45 0.5 586 1084 196 201 0.52 240.7 2.7 30.4 4.7 0.57 46 -2 

12:59 0.75 452 1088 197 204 0.77 361.1 4.0 30.5 4.7 0.85 58 -3 

13:05 0.75 333 1020 192 177 0.77 361.1 4.0 28.6 4.4 0.91 67 8.5 

13:10 0.75 363 1020 0.77 361.1 4.0 28.6 4.4 0.91 64 

13:16 0.75 435 99' 0.77 361.1 4.0 27.7 4.3 0.94 56 

10.49 0.5 595 1084 203 201 0.52 240.7 2.7 30.4 4.7 0.57 45 1 lnj#1 Only 

10:52 0.5 598 1084 197 201 0.52 240.7 2.7 30.4 4.7 0.57 45 -2 lnj #2 Only 

10:56 0.5 594 936 183 181 0.52 240.7 2.7 26.2 4.1 0.66 37 1 lnj#20nly 

10:59 0.5 464 ~36 199 181 0.52 240.7 2.7 26.2 4.1 0.66 50 10 lnj#1 Only 

13:20 0.25 649 1025 0.26 120.4 1.3 28.7 4.5 0.30 37 

13:59 1 223 1,080 247 284 1.03 481.5 5.4 30.2 4.7 1.14 79 -13 Middle Riser 

14:03 1 102 1026 298 236 1.03 481.5 5.4 28.7 4.5 1.21 90 26 2 nozzles 

14:06 0.5 455 1152 213 269 0.52 240.7 2.7 32.3 5.0 0.54 61 -21 

14:10 0.5 491 1152 298 269 0.52 240.7 2.7 32.3 5.0 0.54 57 11 

14:12 0.75 195 1034 305 300 0.77 361.1 4.0 29.0 4.5 0.90 81 2 

14:16 0.75 246 1034 286 300 0.77 361.1 4.0 29.0 4.5 0.90 76 -5 

14:19 1 68 1064 291 304 1.03 481.5 5.4 29.8 4.6 1.16 ! ' -4 

14:23 0.5 456 1064 251 304 0.52 240.7 2.7 29.8 4.6 0.58 f./ -17 

14:27 0.25 865 1063 265 215 0.26 120.4 1.3 29.8 4.6 0.29 19 23 Left lnj Only 

14:31 0.25 764 1063 274 215 0.26 120.4 1.3 29.8 4.6 0.29 28 27 Left lnj Only 

14:33 0.25 768 1116 188 236 0.26 120.4 1.3 31.2 4.9 0.28 31 -20 Right lnj Only 

15:38 1 30 1038 293 233 1.03 481.5 5.4 29.1 4.5 1.19 97 26 Lower Riser 

15:46 0.5 500 1012 301 291 0.52 240.7 2.7 28.3 4.4 0.61 51 3 2 nozzles 

15:48 0.75 173 1021 315 285 0.77 361.1 4.0 28.6 4.4 0.91 83 11 

15:53 0.5 471 1021 293 285 0.52 240.7 2.7 28.6 4.4 0.61 54 3 

15:55 0.75 192 1010 314 270 0.77 361.1 4.0 28.3 4.4 0.92 81 16 

16:00 1 56 1010 299 270 1.03 481.5 5.4 28.3 4.4 1.22 94 11 

16:03 0.5 382 1044 319 293 0.52 240.7 2.7 29.2 4.5 0.59 63 9 One Injector 

16:07 0.5 362 1044 287 293 0.52 240.7 2.7 29.2 4.5 0.59 65 -2 One Injector 

16:10 0.75 129 991 302 304 0.77 361.1 4.0 27.7 4.3 0.94 87 -1 One Injector 

16:15 0.25 676 991 295 304 0.26 120.4 1.3 27.7 4.3 0.31 32 -3 One Injector 

16:18 0.25 724 991 305 304 0.26 120.4 1.3 27.7 4.3 0.31 27 0 One Injector 
INTRODUCTION 

St. Marys Cement, Inc. (SMC) operates a Portland cement manufacturing plant near 

Dixon, Illinois. The Dixon Plant includes three preheater kiln systems and a long dry 

kiln system. SMC performed a long-term pilot test evaluation for Selective NonCatalytic Reduction (SNCR) on the three preheater kiln systems during October 2005. 

The testing was done in accordance with the pilot test construction permit issued by the 

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Application No. 05080006, Facility ID No. 

1 03806AAC). 

The long-term test consisted ofthree separate trial periods; October 18-19, October 25-

26, and October 26-29. However, due to unstable process conditions, the first trial period 

was excluded from the study. 

The three preheater kiln systems are vented to a common stack, which was equipped with 

a Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) for the pilot test. The CEMS, 

rented from and installed by GE Energy Management Services, Inc. (GE Energy), was in 

operation from September 30, 2005 through November 22, 2005. The CEMS were 

utilized to determine the baseline and controlled levels of emissions for nitrogen oxides 

(NOx), sulfur dioxide (SOz), and carbon monoxide (CO). 

The main stack is also equipped with a Continuous Opacity Monitoring System (COMS). 

The COMS was not certified until after completion of the pilot testing, but was used as an 

indicator for particulate matter (PM) emissions impacts due to SNCR. 

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

The following subsections detail the sampling and analytical procedures used for the 

long-term SNCR evaluation. 

CEMS Data 

Emissions of SOz, NOx, and CO were determined with a CEMS operated in 

accordance with the procedures of USEP A Methods 6C, 7E, and 10, respectively. 

A gas sample was drawn from the exhaust stack through a filter and transported to 

a universal gas conditioner through a heated sample line. The gas conditioner 

removed the moisture from the gas stream and pumped a dry gas sample through 

a manifold flow system to a series of instruments. The CEMS included a TECO 

42CHL NOx analyzer (SIN 42CHL-70591-366), a TECO 48 CO analyzer (SIN 

0420107035), a TECO 43CHL S02 analyzer (SIN 43CHL-75704-380), and a 

Servomex 01420D oxygen and carbon dioxide analyzer (SIN 01420D-3497) as 

well as instruments for stack flow (Ashcroft XLdp Pitot Convertor, SIN 

81000180) and temperature (API400G Thermocouple Convertor, SIN J 051 158). 

All of the analyzers were calibrated on a daily basis using USEP A Protocol 1 

certified gases. The analyzers were checked for calibration error by introducing 
zero and high range calibration gases. Copies of the daily calibration logs are 

included in Appendix A. 

Exhaust gas sampling was performed continuously from September 30, 2005 

through November 22, 2005. CEMS data outputs were recorded on data logger 

and laptop computer. The one-minute data logger readings were then analyzed 

using Microsoft Excel. The compiled data logger readings are included on 

compact disc (CD) in Appendix B. 

COMS Data 

The impact on PM em1ss10ns was determined with a COMS operated in 

accordance with the procedures ofUSEPA Method 9. The main stack COMS is a 

Monitor Labs Lighthawk 560 equipped with GE Energy's Data Acquisition and 

Handling System (DAHS) for data compilation, analysis and report generation. 

One-minute average data was extracted from the DAHS and incorporated into the 

Microsoft Excel data analysis spreadsheets which are included on CD in 

Appendix B. 

Process Data 

The long-term test utilized a 19% aqua-ammonia solution as the SNCR reagent. 

The reagent injection rate and location used during the long-term test, as 

established during the iterative testing, were 0.5 gal/min and the lower riser 

position, respectively. 

The clinker production rate from each of the preheater kiln systems was extracted 

from the plant information system and incorporated into the Microsoft Excel data 

analysis spreadsheets which are included on CD in Appendix B. 

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 

The long-term SNCR test results and supplemental information required in the 

construction permit are presented in this section. Table 1 presents the mode-by-mode 

CEMS, COMS and process data summary for the entire data acquisition period. The 

entire data set is included on CD in Appendix B. Examples of the calculations used to 

determine the emissions rates are also included in Appendix B. As discussed above, the 

first SNCR mode and second baseline mode data were excluded from the analysis due to 

an upset on kiln system 1. The other five modes were used to determine the baseline and 

controlled emission rates as required under the construction permit. 

As shown by the data in Table 1, a 0.5 gal/min injection rate of the 19% aqua-ammonia 

solution yielded a NOx reduction of greater than 46 %. Figure 1 graphically presents the 

uncontrolled and controlled hourly average NOx data with test period trend lines. In 

addition, the use of SNCR did not result in an adverse impact to other pollutants and 
pollutant surrogates being monitored. Including upset conditions, the SNCR system was 

in operation for a total of about 105 hours. After accounting for COMS maintenance, no 

appreciable change in hourly average main stack opacity could be attributed to the use of 

SNCR, Figure 2. This result indicates that the use of SNCR under the conditions of the 

long-term pilot test will not have an impact on filterable or condensable PM emissions. 

Further, the reagent injection rate used for the long-term test had demonstrated at 

essentially 1 00% utilization during the iterative test, which supports the conclusion that 

no impact on condensable PM will occur due to SNCR. Finally, no adverse impacts on 

product quality were reported from the on-site analytical laboratory during the test 

period. 

Based on the iterative and long-term pilot testing, SNCR is a feasible technology for the 

purposes of reducing NOx emissions from the Dixon Plant preheater kiln systems. 

Further, SNCR represents a quite effective control technology under the pilot testing 

conditions. Based on the results of the long-term pilot testing, a 0.323 gal/min injection 

rate of 19% aqua ammonia would be required to achieve the 30% reduction in NOx 

emissions necessary to comply with the Illinois NOx SIP Rule. 
TABLE 1 LONG-TERM SNCR TEST RESULTS 

Operating Total Total Probe Stack 

Mode Operating Operating co NOx 502 C02 02 Temp Flow Flow Flow Flow Temp NH40H Opacity Comments 

Days Hours ppm ppm ppm % % F deltaP acfm scfm dscfm F gpm % 

Baseline 1 18.19 436.6 178.01 715.93 6.76 12.26 13.39 314.3 0.16 177567 118371 116003 316.0 0 14.3 

SNCR 1 1.11 26.7 179.67 803.88 4.63 12.36 13.19 313.7 0.16 175579 117090 114748 314.1 0.5 14.4 includes upset on kiln 1 

Baseline 2 5.95 142.7 188.40 747.49 3.93 11.43 13.87 303.4 0.17 179723 121402 118973 316.8 0 14.7 includes upset on kiln 1 

SNCR 2 0.66 15.8 134.65 424.63 0.55 11.50 13.88 315.0 0.18 184730 122956 120497 317.5 0.5 13.7 

Baseline 3 0.30 7.2 137.42 612.47 1.22 11.59 14.12 317.1 0.17 181516 120494 118084 317.5 0 13.1 

SNCR 3 2.58 61.8 139.88 331.38 2.67 11.45 13.89 315.3 0.18 185139 123194 120728 317.9 0.5 11.5 

Baseline 4 24.30 583.1 155.00 612.03 5.06 11.70 13.26 307.8 0.18 187164 125781 123270 316.1 0 13.8 

BASELINE 42.79 1026.9 164.91 657.28 5.80 11.94 13.32 310.7 0.18 182949 122521 120069 316.0 0 14.0 Baseline 1, 3, 4 

SNCR 3.23 77.6 138.79 350.87 2.11 11.46 13.89 315.2 0.18 185053 123144 120680 317.8 0.5 11.9 SNCR 2, 3 

%Reduction 15.8 46.6 63.6 
FIGURE 1 HOURLY AVERAGE NOx EMISSIONS 

-

· 

10/10 10/20 10/30 1119 11/19 

Date 

I -··· - - ... -- -----------·-·--------··--·-------·------- I 

--Baseline NOx · ·· · · Baseline NOx Trend --SNCR NOx '"'"'"""'SNCR NOx Trend 
TABLE 1 LONG-TERM SNCR TEST RESULTS 

Operating Total Clinker 

Mode Operating co NOx 802 Production Comments 

Hours lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr tons/hr "',·• 

Baseline 1 436.6 91.90 607.15 7.98 47.04 

----· ... --~-- -·--·---

SNCR 1 26.7 91.76 674.36 5.41 

Baseline 2 142.7 99.76 650.14 4.76 

SNCR 2 15.8 72.21 374.06 0.68 47.12 

Baseline 3 7.2 72.22 528.72 1.47 47.10 

SNCR 3 61.8 75.16 292.48 3.28 47.13 

Baseline 4 583.1 85.03 551.53 6.35 46.87 

BASELINE 1026.9 87.86 575.01 7.01 46.94 Baseline 1, 3, 4 

!SNCR 77.6 74.56 309.05 2.75 47.13 SNCR 2, 3 

:'Yo Reduction 15.1 46.3 60.8 

lb/ton eli lb/ton eli lb/ton eli 

BASELINE 1.87 12.25 0.15 Baseline 1, 3, 4 

SNCR 1.58 6.56 0.06 SNCR 2, 3 
APPENDIX A 

CALIBRATION DATA 
08: 0 810 100.3 -.03 14 312 .16 173813.1 116171 .L13848 

08:0.._ 0 842 100.3 -.03 .14 312 .17 179328.8 119805 117409 

Page 2 of 2 

Minute Summary Report 

Environmental Systems Corporation 

09/30/05 

(continued) 

Logger Id 01 Logger Name : Logger 01 Interval 001M 

Par am co NOX S02 C02 02 TEMP FLOW ACFM FLOW3 FLOW4 

Units PPM PPM PPM % % DEGF DEL TAP ACFM SCFM DSCFM 

Time -----------------------------------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------

OB:09 0 848 100.3 -.03 .12 312 .16 175367.1 117125 114 7 82 

08:10 6 850 88.6 -.03 -.06 312 .16 174330.0 116436 114107 

08:11 234 343 4.5 -.04 -.22 312 .17 177641.1 118644 116272 

08:12 289 13 3.0 -.04 -.24 312 .16 176739.9 118068 115707 

08:13 288 10 3.0 -.04 -.27 312 .16 176245.5 117733 115379 

08:14 288 8 3.0 -.04 -.31 312 .16 176540.7 117903 115545 

08:15 287 8 3.0 -.04 -.33 313 .16 175412.9 117112 114 7 69 

08:16 277 8 12.7 -.04 -.07 313 .16 176797.1 118046 115685 

08:17 40 4 50.2 -.04 .27 313 .16 177634.4 118576 116204 

08:18 0 0 50.8 -.04 .27 313 .17 178788.4 119242 116857 

08:19 0 0 50.8 -.04 .26 314 .16 177778.1 118528 116158 

08:20 0 0 50.9 -.04 .25 314 .17 178315.2 118894 116516 

08:21 4 0 43.9 -.04 .31 313 .16 175631.4 117131 114 789 

08:22 415 1 . 9 -.04 .16 313 .16 176412.1 117670 115316 

08:23 581 0 .3 -.04 .14 313 .16 175589.7 117137 114 794 

08:24 587 0 . 3 -.04 . 09 313 .17 178816.5 119297 116911 

08:25 588 0 . 3 -.04 .05 313 .17 178415.3 119003 116623 

08:26 590 0 . 3 -.04 .00 313 .16 176186.8 117550 115199 

08:27 588 0 .2 -.03 2. 71 313 .16 175251.5 116891 114554 

08:28 231 0 . 8 4.32 17.27 313 .17 178665.8 119183 116799 

08:29 141 283 6.5 11.66 13.55 313 .16 172807.0 115262 112957 

08:30 185 695 8.2 12.02 13.30 313 .16 175746.7 117206 114862 

Max 910 1646 100.3 19.97 22.25 314 .24 211673.9 141394 138566 

Min 0 0 . 0 -. 04 -.33 310 .14 172807.0 115262 112957 

Mean 168 280 31.9 3.17 2.51 312 .16 178199.0 119052 116671 

Recs 0061 0061 0061 0060 0060 0061 0061 0060 0060 0060 

Data '<' - Less than ##% Data, 'P' - Power Fail, 'D' - Disabled, 'l' - Out-of-Control, 'F' - Boiler Off-Line, 

Flags 'B' - Bad Status, 'C' - Calibration, 'M' - Maintenance, 'O' - Anal0g Overrange, 'U' - Analog Underrange, 

'A' - Arithmetic Error, '+I - Maximum, ,_, -Minimum, 'R' - Rate of Change, 'H' - High-High Alarm, 

'L' - Low-Low Alarm, 'h' - High Alarm, I l t - Low Alarm, 'J' - High Rate of Change, 'j f - Low Rate of Change, 

'V' - DIS #1 Obs, 'W' - DIS #2 Obs, 'X' - DIS #3 Obs, 'Y' - DIS #4 Obs, 'Z' - DIS #5 Obs, 

'f' - Floor Exceeded, 'c' - Ceiling Exc. 
Cur:r~ Date 09/30/05 

Current Time 09:14 

Minute Summary Report 

Environmental Systems Corporation 

09/30/05 

Logger Id 01 Logger Name : Logger 01 Interval 001M 

Par am co NOX 302 C02 02 TEMP FLOW ACFM FLOW3 FLOW4 

Units PPM PPM PPM % '% DEGF DEL TAP ACFM SCFM DSCFM 

Time --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

07:30 0 0 .1 -.04 22.16 310 .16 177439.5 118816 116440 

07:31 0 0 .1 -.04 D 310 .16 174629.5 116913 114575 

07:32 0 0 . 0 -.04 22.25 310 .16 175618.0 117615 115263 

07:33 0 0 .1 17.10 1. 52 310 .16 176545.3 118260 115895 

07:34 0 0 .2 19.95 -.08 311 .16 176689.5 118268 115903 

07:35 0 0 . 3 19.97 -.02 311 .17 17 9135.3 119907 117508 

07:36 0 0 .2 D -.03 311 .17 178308.8 119275 116889 

07:37 0 0 .2 18.09 -.04 312 .16 176560.9 118033 115672 

07:38 0 0 .2 18.09 -.06 311 .16 172849.1 115571 113260 

07:39 0 0 1.3 13.41 1. 00 311 .17 178574.2 119399 117011 

07:40 0 516 90.5 -.01 .40 312 .17 178544.5 119329 116942 

07:41 0 1563 100.3 -.03 .40 312 .17 179243.5 119765 117369 

07:42 0 1646 100.3 -.03 .08 312 .17 178634.0 119376 116988 

07:43 0 1604 100.3 -.03 -.14 311 .16 175554.3 117399 115051 

07:44 0 1581 100.3 -.03 -.17 311 .16 176264.0 117906 115548 

07:45 0 1585 100.3 -.03 -.19 311 .16 173212.0 115849 113532 

07:46 0 1586 100.3 -.04 -.22 311 .17 178838.9 119647 117254 

07:47 104 1571 71.9 -.03 .10 311 .16 176833.3 118327 115960 

07:48 834 465 . 9 -.04 .15 311 .16 177003.2 118421 116053 

.07:49 864 5 . 5 -.04 .14 312 .17 177826.7 118778 116402 

07:50 909 2 . 5 -.04 .11 313 :16 174769.9 116650 114317 

07:51 910 2 . 4 -.04 .06 313 .16 176393.0 117738 115383 

07:52 891 1 9.9 -.04 .17 312 .17 178527.5 119308 116922 

07:53 137 2 88.2 -.04 .48 312 .16 175253.4 117122 114780 

07:54 0 2 90.9 -.04 .47 312 .16 176005.9 117595 1152_43 

07:55 0 2 92.0 -.04 .47 312 .17 179663.8 120050 117649 

07:56 0 2 92.5 -.04 .46 312 .16 176462. 8 117880 115522 

07:57 3 2 38.7 -.03 11.45 312 .21 200372.2 133820 131143 

07:58 0 0 .2 -.04 12.61 312 .24 211673.9 141394 138566 

07:59 0 0 .1 -.04 12.52 312 .16 175867.9 117521 115170 

08:00 0 0 .1 -.04 12.52 312 .16 176016.9 117622 115269 

08:01 0 0 .2 9.32 3.19 312 .23 204736.0 136779 '1.34043 

08:02 0 0 .2 12.69 .42 312 .14 A A A 

08:03 0 0 . 3 12.71 .42 312 .16 177099.7 118384 116016 

08:04 0 0 .2 12.72 .42 312 .17 180219.4 120426 118017 

08:05 0 0 . 9 9.92 .38 312 .16 176932.7 118184 115820 

08:06 0 277 84.5 -.01 .14 312 .16 175387.0 117197 114853 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SillAMAR Y 

S{ • j/)-A r Y ~ t~ n-t.l VI -Jf}1C),'~ K)~ S-/.~;:_ 

Box Truck No: iJox 7 

_1900_ 

COz 

_20_ 

co 

_1000_ 

Calcul~tion: 

Zero 

Mid 

High 

Zero 

Mid 

High 

Zero 

Mid 

High 

Zero 

Low 

Mid 

High 

Zero 

Mid 

High 

------------- 0.0 0 

ALM051231 852.4 

ALM067047 1580 

----------------- 0.0 

ALM041765 50.09 

ALM014908 91.23 

------------- 0.0 

ALM047694 12.71 /2' 7£. 

ALM006050 

-------------- 0.0 D 

ALM059279 301.6 

ALM056638 603.8 

ALM030705 903.3 9 /o. c) 

----------------- 0.0 

AAL9140 12.5 Jz . ...)-z.. 

ALM022336 22.51 7__ z. l.f' 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be ::::; ±2%) 

(j•O 

(). ( 5 

- e>, $I 

a' t .s .... 

- o, o.so.o~-

I.L16 

-D.(, 7 

l. 6'--l 
Cu: Date 09/30/05 

CUl. Time 09:56 

Minute Summary Report 

Environmental Systems Corporation 

09/30/05 

Logger Id 01 Logger Name : Logger 01 Interval 001M 

Param co NOX S02 C02 02 TEMP FLOW ACFM FLOW3 FLOW4 

Units PPM PPM PPM % % DEGF DEL TAP ACFM SCFM DSCFM 

Time --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08:56 21 304 5.2 .01 12.49 315 .19 188971.6 125757 123242 

08:57 0 38 4.4 .00 12.50 315 .18 187598.4 124882 122384 

08:58 0 24 3.9 ~ ~ 313 .18 185907.4 124121 121638 

08:59 0 18 

~ I. 94 3 315 .18 185496.6 123413 120944 

09:00 (§2 16 12.52 .39 315 .17 182455.0 121414 118985 

09:01 0 15 8.9 12.63 .00 315 .18 186028.6 123787 121311 

09:02 0 13 8.4 12.65 . 00 315 .18 185085.0 123151 120688 

09:03 0 11 8.0 ~ ~ 315 .17 180818.0 120328 117922 

09:04 0 61 23.0 2.06 315 .19 190868.4 126989 124449 

09:05 0 684 40.9 .01 .05 315 .18 186688.9 124240 121756 

09:06 0 824 41.1 .00 .05 315 .17 182664.1 121615 119183 

09:07 0 835 41.3 -.01 . 05 315 .18 184447.7 122770 120315 

09:08 0 839 40.9 -.02 . 05 315 .18 183434.5 122085 11964.3 

09:09 0 850 40.8 -.02 . 05 315 .18 183624.3 122185 119741 

09:10 0 854 40.8 -.02 .05 315 .18 183583.7 122161 119718 

09:11 43 (]]]_:) 27.6 -.02 . 03 315 .18 183366.5 122014 119574 

09:12 551 244 5.5 ~ . 02 316 .18 186902.0 124318 121832 

09:13 587 14 5.3 -.03 . 02 316 .18 185651.1 123490 121020 

09:14 585 9 5.2 -.03 . 02 316 .17 182578.3 121303 118877 

09:15 590 7 5.0 -.03 . 02 316 .18 186027.0 123598 121126 

09:16 603 6 4.8 -.03 . 02 315 .19 188731.9 125565 123054 

09:17 607 6 4.7 -.03 .02 316 .18 185234.0 123168 120704 

09:18 (§QD 5 4.6 -.03 .02 317 .19 190980.8 126820 124283 

09:19 459 4 22.3 -.03 . 02 318 .19 189680.8 125842 123325 

09:20 11 4 49.6 -.03 .01 317 .19 190903.5 126682 124148 

09:21 1 4 51.4 -.03 .01 317 .19 188903.3 125405 122897 

09:22 1 CD ~ 1. 69 2.43 311 .18 187122.0 125126 122623 

Max 607 854 51.9 12.65 12.50 318 .19 190980.8 126989 124449 

Min 0 4 3.5 -.03 -~-~ . 00 311 .17 180818.0 120328 117922 

Mean 172 242 20.6 2.06 1. 88 315 .18 186064.9 123786 121310 

Recs 0027 0027 0027 0027 0027 0027 0027 0027 0027 0027 

Data '<' - Less than ##% Data, 'P' - Power Fail, 'D' - Disabled, 'T' - Out-of-Control, 'F' - Boiler Off-Line, 

Flags 'B' - Bad Status, 'C' - Calibration, 'M' - Maintenance, '0' - Analog Overrange, 'U' - Analog Underrange, 

'A' - Arithmetic Error, '+' - Maximum, ,_, - Minimum, 'R' - Rate of Change, 'H' - High-High Alarm, 

'L' - Low-Low Alarm, 'h' - High Alarm, '1' - Low Alarm, 'J' - High Rate of Change, 1 j' - Low Rate of Change, 

'V' - DIS #1 Obs, 'W' - DIS #2 Obs, 'X' - DIS #3 Obs, 'Y' - DIS #4 Obs, 'Z' - DIS #5 Obs, 

'f' - Floor Exceeded, 'c' - Ceiling Exc. 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

_1900_ 

co 

_lQ.QQ_ 

Calculation: 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

0.0 

ALM051231 852.4 

-·--------------- 0.0 g ,_) 

ALM041765 50.09 S/·7 

------------- 0.0 -o· 6 1 

ALM047694 12.71 /2. f;...J 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 12.5 12 . ..) 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be :-s; ±2%) 

- 0 1 2.) 

2,o 

- /,8/ 

/ 0 '0,) 

, o.J~ 

0·0 

O.o 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

_1900_ 

co 

_1000_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

St~ ~l( dQ;~ 

q) 1\~o-v_ ~ ~(J(_-~ )~v--l_ 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

1 

0.0 I ~~3S 

ALM051231 852.4 ?,j) 

0.0 2 .c.y 

ALM041765 50.09 5~.1 

0.0 <:),() 

ALM047694 12.71 I "l . -~/ 

0.0 _Q./3/o 

ALM056638 603.8 z;; ( 

0.0 0.() 

AAL9140 12.5 i ,, . ...--

Cal Gas Value-Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be :S: ±2%) 

I. oz_ 

). ( s 

1. . '1 

j / ., ~ '..../ ....._ 

,. 

' 

(),(_) 

'-.),<.._) 

(; • 0 (L~ 

7.'6"? 

0·0 

·,. 

\_) .J 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Date: 2_ 0 CT c) c;---

Plant: 

Location: 

Box --· Truck No: 

li&lliilt~llillll\lliii~lllli'':t!ll1~li!IIIILtfii NOx Zero ------------- 0.0 f '1, c_/ I() 

_1900_ Mid ALM051231 852.4 f3 ~ !tJs:-~ 

so2 Zero 

100 Mid 

C02 Zero 

_20_ Mid 

co Zero 

__lQQQ_ 

Mid 

02 Zero 

_25_ Mid 

Calculation: 

----------------- 0.0 ~~5--- I ()'··· 

ALM041765 50.09 5"32/5Zt9 

~B. I vv tV~ 

------------- 0.0 0 

ALM047694 12.71 t J_, 7 

-------------- 0.0 O.u ?J 

ALM056638 603.8 l3~ 

----------------- 0.0 () 

AAL9140 12.5 /2,84.) 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 

.,,l· 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

.. ::: :·:~: ; . ·if . 

_1900_ 

co 

_1000_ 

Oz 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

l ~ ( 31 o--f 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mio 

Zero 

Mid 

····-:: ... 

. 

:• __ .. -._ .. • .. m!ii~ . . :-::;.:,:: .. · .. 

·-····-· 

0.0 

ALM051231 852.4 

0.0 

ALM041765 50.09 t;]. s 

0.0 0. (; 0 

ALM047694 12.71 

-------------- 0.0 () t (-1'5:> 

ALM056638 603.8 ,CoO? 

----------------- 0.0 0. <--

AAL9140 12.5 12-~ 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 

iL.;:i::::O:.>:: •• ·•• · 

[:::~~-§~ .•••. 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Date: 

Plant: s:r JV\-t(l\S CrfJ"-( N'TLocation: _u-----~-rx'-\"-o-~-----

Box Truck No: 7 ----------------

_1900_ 

co 

_1000_ 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

ALM051231 

ALM041765 

ALM047694 

ALM056638 

AAL9140 

852.4 

0.0 -I. ( 

50.09 

0.0 

12.71 {2·7 

0.0 

603.8 

0.0 0.0 

12.5 

Calculation: Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span · 

(Must be ::;; ±2%) 
Date: 

Plant: s-1- /lf\. 

Location: De }e-o· r-J 

Box Truck No: 

·>\· . ····::;·:: .•••••.. , •..••..•.•. 

n:::::::: a• ;tt~u:.~~~~( 11nnr · • · · · ···· 

so2 

100 ---

co 

_1000_ 

Calculation: 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

0.0 r& 

ALM051231 852.4 

0.0 0. 1 

ALM041765 50.09 

0.0 

ALM047694 12.71 I _.2 ".61 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 12.5 11. .t.~B 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be :s; ±2%) 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

to 0 c -,~'J ~,--

~ r lf\ 412_ y 5 C'&t/Vl €/t/ t 

Dt/C)h rc 

2 I ( ; ~eJ 

:::.:::.:::::: .... ::':•:::·:·::;;::::': .. · ......... ·· ... . '')j''''''"''''"'"'''''::···: : :::•::•: ::•'•:':::::::<::::::::::::::•::::::•::•::•·:;;:••::::: . . :'. ~HHHH:~:nr::: ,, :':{:f:t •::•:.::ni.ff'~t~~~·~:j~~··i.::::-

• .•.. • ...·.·•.'_,·_·.·· .•··.•.·••.·• .A·····.·_.·.·.·::.:'·= : .•. •_ ..... :•._ .• __•_ ..• ·a,: .•• .. ~_.•·.···.n·.··l··· .. •.·.Y····:·~ .. •.·.•·.z .....•. _.······.·_. :~.S· ... •·.•_ •.•. ,r·_h_··.•·.•.:.a'F_•_.•.·.·.·n··.·.Y_:_ •.•.. • ··•. •· .._ •.P_ .• ...•. •....• .. •._ _..•.•• f ... _ ··_ ..... •·.·.·_.··· • .... ... i_.· .... •.. ·•.•.:•·.·_.··· • ·:_. •. .• ·_ •.'_.·.·.·····.·_.·· •. _·,·.·.· •.·.·_'""•.·.:·.···l·· ... ~.·.n ..•. ..•. :_ ·.~.· .. ···.~ .. _.·. _ ..t •.. •.•.·.. :_af:.·_.~.·.•.·.r.',•.·.,a.•!_•_t···s·_·.•.y.·:.:·.· .• · .•_.•.'_,• •.• ·_.·.·.·•..• · .·._ ..·'._,· •. ·..• ···.··.·.···:·.· •.. :.·.· • ...•. b .. •.•.·.·. •.·.·.•_.·~.·.<J ... ,,·.•.·.:r.:.·•.·YJ .•.- __ •. ·.·.•·_··a•_-.'.•.•.·.·~·.'.•.n ..••... •.•._.·.•-~.:_._,•'.d···_,·•.·· .. :•-.eu .. ·.·.·.••.:_:····.r··m.•=.·.·~.•.·.·.:_._ •. ·_·.m_•·.'_• .. ]:;..·.·.•.·.·.' .. •_·.·•.•• •. _ i..·•• . ·•.• .......... ~.--.·.·:··· ; •• ·.·.• •::·• ;! :n·•n:= .. ': ,,, ... ' :::: .. . :u V• """'" ub "'·"' l'l' u .. .~: 1:•: 8:·~~-=N'·~,., .. .., .. , .... ,.·:.:~~~~~~~: .••.. :jj._f!~~i§p~~·:·· 

_1900_ 

so2 

_100_ 

f.~. 9 tv/ COz. 

co 

_1000_ 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

Zero. 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 dO, A 

ALM051231 852.4 § c:; ex?/ fs-

----------~------ 0.0 3.~/ 

ALM041765 50.09 5G!. ~I 51-~t, 

0.0 0 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 12.5 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be s;; ±2%) 

~ 

<.~ 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

_1900_ 

SOz 

_100_ 

COz 

_m_ 

co 

_1000_ 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Jo[s(oS' ) 

S1- tv \A(, .' ) 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

..... ·.·.·.· .. ·.:··,·.·:-·:· 

0.0 

ALM051231 852.4 

0.0 Li,c 

ALM041765 50.09 tf8.7 

0.0 -0,0} 

ALM047694 12.71 /L.~ 

0.0 () 

ALM056638 603.8 ;·crL 

0.0 0 .'-!7 

AAL9140 12.5 1 3. oq 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 

,'· 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

Zero 

_1900_ Mid 

100 Mid 

co 

_j_QQQ_ 

Calculation: 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

1 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUl\!IMAR Y 

0.0 

ALM051231 

/577 J67/ 

-------~--------- 0.0 (, 7 

ALM041765 50.09 )o, ~ 

0.0 D 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 I.SZ3S/t.vs0.0 

AAL9140 12.5 /l?/;2,~ 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be ::::; ±2%) 

{ 

-_.>· 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

co 

_1000_ 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

. _)( y -:., v 

. I 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

0.0 J( 

ALM051231 -&52 4_ ~ ~jS~ 

1570 

0.0 I.~ 

ALM041765 50.09 ~l. Co 

.; 

0.0 o,.,oo 

ALM047694 12.71 I?_J.~ 7 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 - o. ()<._ 

AAL9140 12.5 I L I ··~ 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 £. 

Span 

'• '··:· 

(Must be :::; ±2%) I · · .~ ' I 

\ !. \ ..... \ 

J ' \ ~· ~ 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

co 

_1000_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

~·---·-·. 

•, 

· /r X(~)\f' 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 33 

ALM051231 I ~6 '1 

/)/'] 

0.0 [.f.o 

ALM041765 50.09 5LO 

0.0 -El~OJ 

ALM047694 12.71 /2.1] 

0.0 0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 i]Cf J 

0.0 -o.3 

AAL9l40 12.5 )2_. lf_B_ 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 

-:" 
!if: 3 I 

Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

.. ···~iH ······•_. 

NOx 

_1900_ 

C02 

~-

co 

_1000_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUM1\1AR Y 

I~ /1-z 16 c;-

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 

ALM051231 -852.4-" 

/~79 /51)5 

0.0 

ALM041765 50.09 

0.0 6 '(')() 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 () () 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 \.)2.~ /Z'.l 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be ::;; ±2%) 

,• 
.;n: il !2,_, :;c __ 

;~;: ~0 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Date: /0/ f3) OS 

(/ 

Plant: 8r 'f'1AJ2.-i S 

Location: =b I X (J-.,) 

BoxTruckNo: ------~r-----------

0.0 2t.f I 

_1900_ Mid ALM051231 852.4-

/~7C7 {r;'-1~ 

Zero 0.0 6,2 

Mid ALM041765 50.09 ..J.Y.t> lo.tr> 

Zero 0.0 o.oa 

Mid ALM047694 12.71 l 2 ,(o I 

Zero 0.0 

Mid ALM056638 603.8 

Zero 0.0 

_25_ Mid AAL9140 12.5 

Calculation: Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be s ±2%) 

., 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

NOx 

_1900_ 

co 

_1000_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

S-1 (V'1vi~ t(_ ~'/ Le_..tAU-~~­

.. \)( ,j ()v-. ~] L. ~~:s-v 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

:·--_,·:~::::::: ·.·. ·:··· ......... . 

.. ::: ·.::::·: :.-.:::::::. 

nnm 

0.0 ·0 

ALM051231 {.$9 c( 

0.0 

ALM041765 50.09 

{ 

0.0 a.s 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 

. ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 0 

AAL9140 12.5 1:?/J I 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 'I 

_1900_ 

SOz 

100 

co 

_lQillL_ 

Calculation: 

------------------

···:::::··::: ::.:::::::::··:·-:·::::::.·:·:·::::::·::::·:·: ::;:·::· 

H<ii:-tio':~}c:i,,:.:···:: -,.:::. • • :····:····· :_ ••• ,_ •.•.•...• _.:.···-~~{ :····:·:···:···,····:····,········ 

Zero 0.0 

Mid ALM051231 

1_:) 1'-1 

Zero 0.0 

Mid ALM041765 50.09 

Zero 0.0 ,_ o. 01. 

Mid ALM047694 12.71 11-.i_f 

Zero 0.0 

Mid ALM056638 603.8 

Zero 0.0 

Mid AAL9140 12.5 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be :::; ±2%) 

r 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

NOx 

~-~ 

1900 

SOz 

_100_ 

COz 

_lQ_ 

co 

_1000_ 

Oz 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

/D l !'ifo s=: 

7 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 -1.-zl 

ALM051231 .--252.4- It 2'? 

/-5"71 ... 

0.0 /.0 

ALM041765 50.09 t)(9,:v 

------------- 0.0 /)~() 

ALM047694 12.71 /2.h 

-------------- 0.0 (J./'Z.~ 

ALM056638 603.8 t5L 

----------------- 0.0 ().07 

AAL9140 12.5 lZ.7 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be ::::: ±2%) 

0 rfc~I>J., ~) 

-.:'".\) .(( '>. ) ~~~ '··.I 

/ I Z. . .::; 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

_1900_ 

co 

_1000_ 

_25_. 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

12: (){) 

Dl X()\-'\ .. TIZero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 

ALM051231 ~ 

/51'1 14CJq 

0.0 0 

ALM041765 ~ 79., .;;-· 

!.j;;L,23 

0.0 C> 

ALM047694 12.71 q_, 5~-

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 12.5 I2· ~2.. 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span. 

(Must be ::::; ±2%) 

'v~~ 3 .I' t1 "-

Cj 2 t ) ve? ,a, '-1. 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

~) .. -\ 

LV 

Box Truck No: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

/); .. / \.._A...j as 

'''''i''''''''"l'''''''''''''"''''ll':'':'''''''' : i:ii!~jb_:_.~_b_ .• .• ~ ~.''_:_h_::_:_t_•~_:.:_ - ,: tiT::F : a'' ' ~m: :::: '. : ::::: ::::::':~ ::::::: :::; ''}' : ;}'~ ; : ' -.•:·_.,·,•,:•_-_:_._:.,:_._D_,_-,·,·,·:·_:,.,iffi_._._,_ •. :_.' __ .,.:_·_, •. •. _ _._·-~,·-·-·-'_._,t_•,·,:,:_~,:_: __ ' __ •. ,._ll_,•_-,:_._._._-_c_'_,:_.,·,~,'.:·_'._: __ -_:._.,l,!A,'_._:.·,:,._.,·_•.:~,•.·,••-•-'_:_ .•. _._ 

I_::_' •• : .•. ·_;_, •. "_,·'_.:.~ ,·• __._~'_._._~,-.',··.n',·_,',•_=,y,-.',··_"'',._ .• =,:_z,•_ .• -~_,,_' __ ,··s~.=,·_:_.•.r,·:_:_n_:_:,•.•_•_,··a·:,._,•,-_•,-_nY,·_._•.•.=,·_:,.,,._,n ,•.• __ ,·• __ ,·':·,·.F __ , ..__ _._.') ~=.-.-._: __ ,_•.-.• •• _ _.,•.••·-·-·-·~--··••_l_':_z_x_._·.'a'Jt''~_···,•·-~-,-=·_,,T, __ • ..:u~r_.mJi•_•i._._,,L_ •• _._.r::_=_::_,_••:::• :: :::'?:''::;;;;;;;::.,::•,:::: .. :::::::':,.:::::::::: .... : .. ,,, .. u ~, •• •:•··~~tt~~~ .,_,., ,,,,R~~,,,,,,}~,,,,,,,,u~,,,,.,,;, ~~~'·!t~!i![}'•-~~~~l~Pii~,-- : .• :~:9~§e~ni i:'F 

NOx 

_1900_ 

SOz 

_100_ 

COz 

_20_ 

co 

_1000_ 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 

ALM051231 852.4-

0.0 

ALM041765 -S0.09 

iz. c3 

0.0 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 0.<--J! 

AAL9140 12.5 

Cal Gas Value --'Analyzer Response xi 00 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 

I 

I 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUM:MARY 

Date: 

Plant: 5/vl( 

Location: 

Box Truck No: _:]--------~--------

•. ··,:::;·······.····· 

. . ri}Bf[ •.••• 

NOx 

_1900_ 

co 

__j_QQQ_ 

Calculation: 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 

ALM051231 ----&52.4 

0.0 - CJ ._8 

ALM041765 _;)Q,09-

0.0 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 O.c 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 Q. 0 '-

. AAL9140 12.5 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be :s; ±2%) 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Date: to(z2f6'5' 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

..... :·:·::·· :······. 

so2 

100 

co 

1000 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

v 

l 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

·,·.-·: .. : .. 

0.0 2o • 

ALM051231 -852.4 J)}'l - ~-(~{1JJ~-----

1~71 I 

0.0 -'1-..- L 

ALM041765 50.09' Of2.6 

9Z- 'L J 7 

0.0 -O.Gl 

ALM047694 12.71 £2,:51 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 CoOl 

0.0 0.03 

AAL9140 12.5 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be :s; ±2%) 

.,_'-· 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

NOx 

1900 

so2 

100 

co 

____lQQQ_ 

25 ---

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMJ\1ARY 

s t- MM '1/ s- c t:: t-i-,;;~;t( r 

/~(X-~ J:'L 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 

ALM051231 

ALM041765 

7.2. 2 J 

0.0 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 12.5 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be :::;; ±2%) 

.,,'·· 

I ' 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Date: f 6( 2 '-{{o-r: 

Plant: 

Location: 

BoxTruckNo: ---~~-------------

j!ll~~·~~ .! iJ~!II-IIIlil~,~~~~ < llili~l ,]j: 

SOz 

100 

COz 

_20_ 

co 

_j_QQQ_ 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 

ALM051231 852.-4 

/57 '1 

0.0 0.2..-

ALM041765 ~Q9-

0.0 -0 d( 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 \ 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 12.5 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be:<:;; ±2%) 

f 

I 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Date: _/_() A'---z-"'---s--l-1 o-'---'5"'-------

Plant: ---'''--"'S_:_M--.::::~"--------

Location: -JOrL/-P-(..LLy~-z:yJ-=-------

Box Truck No: ~·7 --~--------

SOz 

100 

COz 

_]Q_ 

co 

~1000_ 

_25_ 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 

ALM051231 -&52.4 

JL( 1 b 

0.0 

ALM041765 .....,.--j(J:09-

1z. .. l-3 

0.0 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 

I '1 

/5/t 

s-.8 

d~. 3 

o.o 

) J.o'{ 

Calculation: Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be::;; ±2%) 

l c. 5 .4< ,_,.~-- , 

rl.e -~·evo 

v· .e. ),l .. ""'v-.. 

I 

( 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

NOx 

1900 

:.;::.:<: 

co 

_1000_ 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMJ\1ARY 

I I 

t 0 Z~(u)"' 

· .. :.: .: : : .··. :::)· (~:·i .. : ..... ·. >. 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 0 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 28 

ALM051231 

0.0 

ALM041765 

0.0 .:-- 0, 0 

ALM047694 12.71 1 7... J b 1 

0.0 0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be :::-; ±2%) 

, 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Date: i () /21 ( () J 

Plant: __,_..(5~/A___,C=-----

Location: U ( K il AJ 

Box Truck No: _l_.L._ ______ _ 

SOz 

_100_ 

co 

__j_QQQ_ 

Zero 

Mid ALM051231 

Zero 

Mid ALM041765 

Zero 

Mid ALM047694 

Zero 

Mid ALM056638 

Zero 

Mid AAL9140 

0.0 -2 .. 2 

IIJD 

0.0 (::) ,06 

12.71 /Z ·7t 

0.0 I 

603.8 kub 

0.0 o. z \ 

~ 2? .(! 

?'L-'5 ( 

Calculation: Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 

(e .-e evn 

(/.(_C....~ .. 

(G!5~v-t I 

.;e. -:z.e v o 

;(t ),;t.::-~ ...... 
~t,. 

D

.) \ . 

Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

1900 

co 

1000 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

CALIBRATION ERROR SillvfMARY 

ALM051231 

ALM041765 

ALM047694 

ALM056638 

AAL9140 

0.0 

< 58.89 ~ 

Ci''L '1 5 

0.0 

12.71 

0.0 

603.8 

0.0 

14J3 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be::::; ±2%) 

"? t,.. 1-:::::-~t ~ '"' -~t­ <:'_,r-J 

l 

' 
Date: 

Plant: .$0\C 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

SOz 

100 

COz 

__m_ 

co 

__j_QQQ_ 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

It 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

0.0 ~~ 

ALM051231 

0.0 - (). ~ 

ALM041765 lf1- 7 

0.0 -o.-u'-1 

ALM047694 12.71 , l_ • _r 

0.0 0,}-( 

ALM056638 603.8 ~ l2_ 

0.0 

AAL9140 

CalGasValue -Analyzer Response xlOO 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 

.::.:·:::·.:.:".: ... :·:.: .·. 

r 

v e ·::t- c:. " ~ 

,, t:J "',1)_., . • - ...... I .J 

'~c 

Ve.c. /L,r, 

IJ ~ -1::t..v\) 

v~~)<:!V~ -, 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

1900 

SOz 

_100_ 

COz 

_1Q_ 

co 

1000 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

5 T Vl-1 14·12 (s- ~.e.-._ -fv I x_ c!l.,.-., I<-

.--·· 

1(/.tJo 

.· :.: .. ,:.::.·. 

Zero 0.0 ~~ 

Mid ALM051231 8§2.4-

( ctct r; ~~L'-sZero 0.0 0, 2.. 

Mid ALM041765 ~0.09-

CJ2. 23' ~:?,4 

Zero 0.0 

Mid ALM047694 12.71 /) s-2 

Zero 0.0 0, () 

Mid ALM056638 603.8 ta6 

Zero ----------------- 0.0 0 

Mid AAL9140 ....J.2..5- ~},t-!2. 

,22,5! 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be~ ±2%) 

,, 

.. ""-
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

1900 

co 

1000 

Calculation: 

1 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMJ\.1ARY 

0.0 

ALM051231 -~ 

0.0 

ALM041765 

0.0 -6.0\ 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 0 

AAL9140 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response· x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be s ±2%) 

I' 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Date: 

Plant: _S-'--_tl__,~"---"-c""'-" _____ _ 

Location: ]_, . .____,___! _~w_.;;__ ____ _ 

Box Truck No: I --~--------

NOx 

1900 

SOz 

100 

COz 

_1Q_ 

co 

1000 

Calculation: 

Zero 0.0 

Mid ALM051231 -8-52:'4-

if'(ry \::, 

Zero 0.0 Q. '-/ 

Mid ALM041765 ~ 

72. ?3 

Zero 0.0 - 6.1JJ5 

Mid ALM047694 12.71 1'2--5'3 

Zero 0.0 

Mid ALM056638 603.8 (o04 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 o. ~I 

AAL9140 ~ 27.7~ 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be s ±2%) 

tJo c·r¢d'r 

•' J, i..· 4H· . . 

I 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

Date: :2 AloV () s---

Plant: 

Location: /II z j - BoxTruckNo: ---:?4---------~---

l\tlll_l,\illlt111111lllil,ll&\; 

NOx 

_J.2illL 

SOz 

_100_ 

co 

_j_QQQ_ 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

I 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

------------- 0.0 d6-

ALM051231 .g.;;~ 

'0 9'1(/ 

----------------- 0.0 0 

ALM041765 50.09 

0.0 0 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUM11ARY 

Date: l J /3tfv J ~~~. ~----------

Plant: ___,{1-=" .-'M-~C'-. __________ _ 

Location: _

1

_U--i!-'-k,_,O"-"'IV-=-----------

Box Truck No: 7 

1900 

SOz 

100 

COz 

_20_ 

co 

1000 

_25_ 

-----------------

Zero 

Mid ALM051231 

Zero 

Mid ALM041765 

Zero 

Mid ALM047694 

Zero 

Mid ALM056638 

Zero 

Mid AAL9140 

0.0 30 

' ~52.4 

0.0 o. I 

~0.09 

0.0 -. (j .. (5] 

12.71 

0.0 

603.8 1)83 

0.0 J), ()) ' 

· Calculation: Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be~ ±2%) 

--'I 
CALIBRATION ERROR SillviMARY 

Dme: ~Lyt/~1~~-~~~---------

Plant: ~ AA!;;: 

Location: \[) / ')( <tv-J, 

Box Truck No: f --~--------------

t':'lll 

:. ·•.•. r:07•• 

NOx 

1900 

SOz 

100 

COz 

___1Q_ 

co 

1000 

Oz 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

Zero ------------- 0. 0 :2 .r 

Mid ALM051231 -%52.4 o 3 9' 

Zero 0.0 () 

. Mid ALM041765 

Zero o.o - 0 _ o_5 

Mid ALM047694 12.71 )1. lot 

Zero 0.0 () 

Mid ALM05663 8 603.8 &JZf 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 0·02.-

AAL9140 .J..2..S- _?___?. 2. J 

"2?-5"1 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xlOO 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 

rt~b\.A- T 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMJ\1ARY 

s + v'lt1 4-12 r5 (r ~:v'h FZ /\( T 

D;x o v'l 

..... . . . . . . . · .. ·.·-· .. ··-··· ...... ···-·· ····.·., .. ·. ....... . ..... ·.· .. ·.·.·-·-· .. ·.·.·.·•· .. · .. 

11111\tr!lflmt~til&t-lrtiiiiii111'11Jal:tl NOx 

_l2illL 

SOz 

_100_ 

COz 

_20_ 

co 

1000 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

------------- 0 0 ') '/ . o--" .,?-.... 

ALM051231 ~ 

----------------- 0. 0 /, '-

ALM041765 50.09 _-1------+ 

0.0 v 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 

() 
CALIBRATION ERROR Sillvflv1ARY 

Date: ~A/ dll 0 ~ 

Plant: S}7(11 vl-t is c b-v~ r;rLocation: D.J:A~ 

BoxTruckNo: ~~+---------------

II 

····.···:: ,,f(l ~ ..... 

_1900_ 

SOz 

_100_ 

COz 

_N_ 

co 

_1000_ 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

' Zero 

Nlid 

. ... · .. :,:,.,::·:':··_:. 

. :·: , .. _.,:.::-:::-::'-: :=:::-: 

ALM051231 

ALM041765 

ALM047694 

ALM05663'8 

AAL9140 

[l ', L/ z3 

0.0 -22 

~ 

ffC/cf (/ fJ I~ 

0.0 0 

50.09 

0.0 {) 

12.71 

0.0 

603.8 

0.0 () 

~) 3 "' 

or_:...• " . l, 

Calculation: Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xlOO 

Span 

(Must be ~ ±2%) 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

SOz 

100 

COz 

_lQ_ 

co 

1000 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUNIMARY 

t l [ J ( G~ 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

l\llid 

0.0 2_q 

ALM051231 ~ YSO 

V'{tf -1 

0.0 O,Lf 

ALM041765 -5-G:-8§1 

€fL. L-3, 

0.0 ....-o_.oc 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 I 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 O_.()J 

AAL9140 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be ::; ±2%) 

., ~. 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

NOx 

1900 

SOz 

_100_ 

COz 

_20_ 

co 

1000 

Oz 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

n (>?/o5 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUNlMARY 

0.0 :ss 

ALM051231 852.4 

1Cff_ 1 x?..</ { 

0.0 I ~ I 

ALM041765 ..5.0.,.G9-· 

12-13 

0.0 -o. 0 ~ 

ALM047694 12.71 !7.-IPY 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 0. D\ 

AAL9140 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be::;; ±2%) 

.. ,>· 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMMARY 

I I I'! o U o s-(t J!Jc>tl Q 5 - ; 

5 r vvr ft-12- Y 5 ~~Er-t r 

V; X t!v\. :r= L. 

Box Truck No: 7 ----~-----------

.· ... c.~m· 

_1900_ 

SOz 

_100_ 

COz 

_20_ 

co 

~1000_ 

Zero 

Nfid 

Zero 

Nfid 

Zero 

Nfid 

Zero 

Nfid 

Zero 

Nfid 

. . . 

:< ,~ . :·l!'.:({j ~~-~t rc':iiH-~i. !} 

0.0 /7 

ALM051231 

ALM041765 

0.0 D 

ALM047694 12.71 ./J. {,j 

0.0 

0 

ALM056638 603.8 ~ r t-( 

0.0 

AAL9140 

]'(···· 

::::;.(:•.:· .. 

.-. 

0 

J;l,L- 2J,(j_t '.22,')? b==========k======~========~~====~~~~~==========d 

Calculation: Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xlOO 

Span 

(Must be::::; ±2%) 
CALIBRATION ERROR SUM:MARY 

Date: I SIA/o U c> .,---

Plant: )( Vl1 tl-h\: ·(' 5 C fC v~1 rr::-N j---

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

1900 

SOz 

_100_ 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

0.0 -;:<) 

ALM051231 852.4 • 

0.0 ~ 

ALM041765 -50.09 . 

9V. 17_ Cf'l. ( 

0.0 () 

..•.•..•. ·•. .... . ....... . 

COz 

_20_ Mid ALM047694 12.71 I;:( uS Z,. 

co 

1000 

Oz 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

0.0 0 

ALM056638 603.8 

I 

0.0 0 

AAL9140 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be s; ±2%) 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

NOx 

1900 

SOz 

100 

co 

1000 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Ivlid 

CALlBRATION ERROR SUN.[MARY 

ALM051231 

0.0 

ALM041765 

0.0 

ALM047694 12.71 \ 1 'tiq 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 -~C27 

0.0 Q. 0"2 

AAL9140 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xl 00 

Span 

(Must be~ ±2%) 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: · 

1900 

SOz 

100 

COz 

_20_ 

co 

_jQQQ_ 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

CALffiRATIONERRORS~Y 

f ) 

It If lq I ('[ r 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

J\!Iid 

0.0 

ALM051231 852.4 

0.0 

ALM041765 

0.0 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 

ALM056638 603.8 

0.0 

AAL9140 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xlOO 

Span 

(Must be:::; ±2%) 
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

1900 

SOz 

100 

co 

1000 

_25_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMNIARY 

1tj1-1 (OS' 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

!viid 

ALM051231 .::852.4 

0.0 o. I 

ALM041765 50.09 'rl ') 

0.0 

ALM047694 12.71 

0.0 

ALM056638 .603.8-

~01l 

0.0 

AAL9140 12.5 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response x

1 00 

Span 

(Must be::; ±2%) 

' .. , . ..: .·..; . ..:,:~··.• -·---' 

((_ ) /}n II\ 

1 -
Date: 

Plant: 

Location: 

Box Truck No: 

1900 

co 

~1000_ 

Calculation: 

CALIBRATION ERROR SUMNIARY 

u /z z_/o(-

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

Mid 

Zero 

JVIid 

0.0 20 

ALM051231 

0.0 

ALM041765 

0.0 

ALM047694 12.71 fz_ ~; 

0.0 2 

ALM056638 

0.0 0-Cf7 

AAL9140 

Cal Gas Value -Analyzer Response xi 00 

Span 

(Must be:::; ±2%) 
APPENDIXB 

ANALYTICAL DATA 
EXAMLPE CALCULATIONS 

Emission Rate, lblhr 

E ppm X MW X Fscfm Eib/ = ___,__,__ ____ _ /he C 

where: 

E1blhr emission rate, lblhour 

Eppm emission rate, ppm 

MW molecular weight of pollutant 

F scfm = exhaust gas flow rate, scfm 

C conversion constant, 6422036 

Emission Rate, lblhr 

Eib/ 

E __ l_hhc 

lb/ - /ton p 

where: 

Etb/ton 

Etblhr 

p 

= emission rate, lb/ton clinker 

= emission rate, lblhour 

= production rate, tons/hour clinker 

Percent Reduction 

where: 

R 

Ec 

Eb 

= percent reduction, % 

= controlled emission rate 

= baseline emission rate