alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.29

                     Increase in Shares Reserved Under the
                     -------------------------------------
                     SUPERVALU INC. Restricted Stock Plan
                     ------------------------------------


     "WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions adopted on April 10, 1991, the Board of
Directors authorized, approved and established a restricted stock plan known as
the Super Valu Stores, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan, now known as the SUPERVALU
INC. Restricted Stock Plan (the "Plan"), that is administered by the Chief
Executive Officer for certain employees of SUPERVALU INC. (the "Company") and
its affiliates; and

     WHEREAS, 45,000 shares of the Company's common stock, $1.00 par value
("Common Stock"), remain available for the granting of awards under the Plan
from the prior authorizations of 200,000 shares of Common Stock; and

     WHEREAS, the Executive Personnel and Compensation Committee has reviewed,
approved and recommended to the Board of Directors that the number of shares of
Common Stock available for grants of awards under the Plan be increased by
100,000; and

     WHEREAS, the Committee has further approved and recommended to the Board of
Directors that the Plan be restated to reflect such share increase; and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best
interest of the Company and its stockholders to increase the number of shares
available for grants of awards under the Plan and to restate the Plan;

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby
authorizes and approves the amendment and restatement of the Plan having the
terms set forth in the following resolutions.

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that the number of shares of Common Stock, available for
granting awards under the Plan shall be 300,000, less all shares previously
awarded, which shares may be either newly issued shares or treasury shares;
provided, that if any shares covered by an award are forfeited or if an award
shall otherwise terminate without delivery or vesting of any shares to be
received thereunder, then the number of shares covered by such award, to the
extent of any such forfeiture or termination, shall again be available for
granting awards under the Plan; and provided further, that the number and type
of shares available for granting awards under the Plan shall be adjusted
appropriately in the event of any merger, consolidation, reorganization,
recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend or similar change in the capital
structure of the Company.

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that up to 300,000 shares of Common Stock, less that
number of shares previously awarded, are hereby reserved for grants of
restricted stock awards under the Plan, subject to adjustment from time to time
in accordance with the foregoing resolutions; and any shares of Common Stock
issued pursuant to restricted stock awards shall be duly authorized, validly
issued, fully paid and nonassessable.


Dated: April 12, 2000
No. 59125.

protests 214014-K and 243624-K (New York).

#### Jules Weber, Inc., and Gehrig Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles herein are similar in all material respects to the mustard jars the subject of *Julliard Fancy Foods Co.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1625), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2007247EN.01002102.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 May 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-51/07) (1)

1

(2007/C 247/30)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.

1

---
# C_2007269EN.01004901.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/49

---

Action brought on 9 August 2007 — Offshore Legends v OHIM — Acteon (OFFSHORE LEGENDS (in blue, black, green))

(Case T-306/07)

(2007/C 269/88)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Offshore Legends NV (Nevele, Belgium) (represented by: P. Mayaert and N. Clarembeaux, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Acteon SARL (Saint-Tropez, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul, in part, the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 29 May 2007 (Case R 1038/2006-2); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, in part, the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 29 May 2007 (Case R 1038/2006-2);

| — | Order OHMI to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHMI to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Offshore Legends

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Offshore Legends’ in blue, black and green, for goods in classes 3, 9, 14, 18, 20, 24, 25, 28 and 35 — Application No 2 997 021

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Acteon SARL

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and international figurative mark ‘Offshore One’ for goods in classes 16, 18 and 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition is rejected in respect of the entirety of the contested goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the decision of the opposition division, to the extent that it rejected the opposition in respect of the goods in classes 18 and 25

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), to the extent that the Board of Appeal erred in its assessment of the risk of confusion and, in particular, erred with regard to the assessment of the similarity of the trade marks in question.

Pleas in law

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BRASILAGRO  Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Julio Cesar de Toledo Piza Neto, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/    Julio Cesar de Toledo Piza Neto
|Name: Julio Cesar de Toledo Piza Neto 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer        



|                
|----------------
|October 31, 2013



1
#### Jerry THORNTON v. Darrell David BRUCE

CA 90-143

800 S.W.2d 723

Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I

Opinion delivered December 19, 1990

*32*Daily, West, Core, Coffman & Canfield,*by: *Eldon F. Coffman,*and *Douglas M. Carson,*for appellant.

*Shaw, Ledbetter, Hornberger, Cogbill & Arnold,*by: *R. Gunner DeLay,*for appellee.

George K. Cracraft, Judge.

Jerry Thornton appeals from an order of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission denying him benefits for a back injury alleged to have occurred in the scope of his employment with appellee Darrell David Bruce. The only issue presented on appeal is whether the administrative law judge erred in refusing to allow appellant’s wife to testify as a witness. We affirm.

In December 1, 1988, the administrative law judge ordered that lists of witnesses be provided to the Commission and opposing counsel no later than January 15, 1989, and that all depositions be completed by February 15, 1989. The hearing on the merits was scheduled for February 16. On January 24,1989, appellant’s attorney advised the ALJ and appellee’s counsel that he was adding appellant’s wife to his list of witnesses that was previously provided pursuant to the prehearing order. Appellee objected to appellant’s wife being permitted to testify because her name had not been provided to either the Commission or counsel for appellee by January 15, as required by the pre-hearing order. Appellee’s objection was sustained. At the conclusion of the hearing on the merits, the ALJ found that appellant had sustained a compensable injury to his right leg and awarded benefits, but denied appellant any benefits attributable to his back problems. The Commission affirmed, adopting the findings made by the ALJ. There was no mention in either the opinion of the Commission or that of the ALJ of the latter’s ruling prohibiting appellant’s wife from testifying.

On appeal, appellant argues that the ALJ erred in ruling that appellant’s wife not be'permitted to testify because an ALJ has no authority to prohibit a witness from testifying under the rules of the Commission or the rules of civil procedure. For the reasons stated below, we do not address appellant’s argument.

In workers’ compensation cases, the Commission conducts a *de novo*review of the record; it is not its function to *33review the decision made by the ALJ for error. On appeal to this court, we review the decision of the Commission and not that of the ALJ. *Johnson*v. *Hux,*28 Ark. App. 187, 772 S.W.2d 362 (1989). The Commission is authorized to take testimony by deposition or otherwise, Ark. Code Ann.-§ 11-9-207(a) (10) (1987), or to remand the matter to the ALJ for the purpose of taking additional evidence. Ark. Code Ann. § 1l-9-704(b)(7) (1987). Here, appellant sought neither remedy with regard to this witness but simply asks us to reverse the case, contending that the ALJ committed error. Because we find no error in the proceedings before the Commission, the case is affirmed.

Mayfield and Rogers, JJ., agree.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6765]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2007F-0115]


Durand-Wayland, Inc.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that 
Durand-Wayland, Inc., has filed a petition proposing that the food 
additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of a carbon 
dioxide laser for etching information on food, excluding meat and 
poultry.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul C. DeLeo, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 301-436-1302.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 7M4768) has been filed by Durand-Wayland, Inc., 
c/o Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C., 700 13th St., NW., suite 1200, 
Washington, DC 20005-5929. The petition proposes to amend the food 
additive regulations in 21 CFR part 179 to provide for the safe use of 
a carbon dioxide laser for etching information on food, excluding meat 
and poultry.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(j) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

    Dated: April 4, 2007.
Laura M. Tarantino,
Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. E7-6765 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
No. 46842.

#### Protest 65284-K of New York Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

*445Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the shoe brushes in question are similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Heinrich, Herrmann & Weiss*(26 C. C. P. A. 292, C. A. D. 30) the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 1506 was sustained. *Sears, Roebuck*v. *United States*(id. 161, C. A. D. 11) cited.
# C_2007136EN.01002402.xml

| 20.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4593 — Voestalpine/Dancke)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 136/05)

On 16 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4593. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4593. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
WASATCH PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
                             310 East 4500 South 450
                               Murray, Utah 84107

April __, 2001


22,852,594
         RE:     NOTICE OF CORRECTION OF WARRANT CERTICATES

Dear Shareholders:

         On June 22, 2000, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of class
"A" and class "B" warrants to be issued to each shareholder owning shares of
common stock on the designated record date. The total number of warrants
approved by the board of directors equaled, the sum of shares of common stock
issued and outstanding immediately after the effect of the reverse stock split
on June 22, 2000. The aggregate number of warrants issued equaled 22,852,594.
The total number of warrants were divided equally between class "A" and class
"B." There are 11,426,297class "A" and 11,426,297 class "B" warrants issued. In
accordance with the Board's authorization, each shareholder is entitled to
receive one class "A" warrant and one class "B" for every two shares of common
stock held on the record date.

         Section 1.1 of your Warrant Certificate is incorrect, and should be
amended, in order to be in accord with the Board of Director's authorization.
Section 1.1 should be amended to read as follows:

         1.1 ISSUANCE AND TERMS. Wasatch Pharmaceutical, Inc. a Utah corporation
(the "Company") hereby issues to the shareholder named herein, a class "A"
warrant and a class "B" warrant for every two each shares of common stock owned
as of the date set forth herein (collectively referred to as "Warrants"), under
the terms and conditions set forth below.

         The warrants certificates that you received have the correct number of
warrants to be issued in accordance with the amended section 1.1 and the
original authorization by the Board of Directors. You have received a class "A"
warrant and a class "B" warrant for every two shares of common stock you owned
as of the record date. Any fractional warrants that would have been issued
pursuant to the terms of section 1.1 have been rounded up to the next whole
warrant.

         For further information, you may contact us at: 310 East 4500 South
450, Murray, Utah 84107, (801) 566-9688, and you may visit our web site at
www.wasatchpharm.com.

         We appreciate your support and look forward to improving shareholder
value as we implement our business plan.


Best Wishes,



Gary V. Heesch, President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7188
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES TERRY LITTLE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-94-49) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Terry Little, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for production of transcripts at the Government's expense. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Little , No. CR-94-49 (M.D.N.C. July 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2008025EN.01002101.xml

| 30.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/21

---

Notice of a corrigendum of the vacancy notice for the post of secretary-general (Grade AD16 — Special career bracket) — (Article 2(a) and Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the European Communities)

(2008/C 25/06)

Staff of the European institutions are hereby informed that the vacancy notice for the post of secretary-general of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) published in the English, French and German versions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ C 316 A, 28.12.2007) has been modified (see OJ C 25 A, 30.1.2008).

Official Journal of the European Union

---
No. 41918.

#### Protest 213148-G of S. Shawiry (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of laces similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# International charter of physical education & sport

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  International charter of physical education & sport 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  American Council on International SportsUnited States. Department of Education 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Education 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Text of the charter, as agreed to on November 21, 1978. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Unesco 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  U.S. Department of Education publication ; no. E-80-12001; Publication (United States. Dept. of Education) ; no. E-80-12001. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  191 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  22609982.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this annual report of Globus Maritime Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Georgios Karageorgiou, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 28, 2011





By:
/s/ Georgios KarageorgiouName: Georgios KarageorgiouTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer