alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A90A0076.

#### RAY v. THE STATE.

(393 SE2d 524)

Pope, Judge.

Defendant Mark Trent Ray was convicted by a jury of armed robbery, robbery by intimidation and obstruction of a law enforcement officer. He appeals, contending that prejudicial error occurred when the State was allowed to cross-examine him “in such a manner as to force [him] to compare the credibility of his testimony with that of the [State’s] witnesses who appeared against him.” We affirm.

The robbery charges against defendant arose out of two separate *397incidents which occurred at a Majik Market store located at 3221 Wrightsboro Road in Augusta, Georgia. Employees of the store testified at trial and identified defendant as the person who had committed the robberies. A customer of the store also identified defendant as the perpetrator of one of the incidents. A friend of defendant’s, with whom he was living at the time the crimes were committed, testified that defendant was “passed out drunk” during the times the robberies were allegedly committed. Defendant also testified at trial that he had been drinking on the dates of the crimes and that he was asleep at the times the robberies occurred. On cross-examination the State asked the defendant if the witnesses who positively identified him as the perpetrator of the crimes “didn’t know what [they] were talking about” in light of defendant’s version of events that placed him somewhere else at the time the crimes were committed. It is to this line of questioning that defendant objects to on appeal.

Decided April 18, 1990.

*David V. Weber,*for appellant.

*Michael C. Eubanks, District Attorney, Charles R. Sheppard, Richard E. Thomas, Katherine F. Bond, Assistant District Attor*
      *398
      *neys,*for appellee.

*397At the outset we note that defendant posed no objection to the portion of the cross-examination asserted as error on appeal. “ ‘A ground not raised by objection at trial cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. (Cit.)’ *Williams v. State,*178 Ga. App. 216, 217 (2) (342 SE2d 703) (1986).” *Collins v. State,*183 Ga. App. 243, 244 (4) (358 SE2d 876) (1987). See also *Hall v. State,*180 Ga. App. 881 (2) (350 SE2d 801) (1986). Defendant contends, however, that the error allegedly committed here was of “constitutional magnitude” in that it violated his right to take the stand in his own behalf and thus his failure to object at trial should not preclude review by this court. “[A] defendant cannot convert harmless error to reversible error by simply attaching to an incident more significance than it in fact bears.” *Rivers v. State,*250 Ga. 288, 295 (298 SE2d 10) (1982). However, out of an abundance of caution, we have considered defendant’s arguments concerning the allegedly improper cross-examination and find no grounds for reversal. Specifically, the questioning here, contrary to defendant’s contentions on appeal, did not force the defendant to challenge the veracity of the State’s witnesses, as evidenced by the fact that defendant responded to the line of questioning by stating that the witnesses were entitled to voice their “opinion.”

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Deen, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Oraco Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven A. Subick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Steven A. SubickSteven A. SubickChief Executive OfficerMarch 4, 2011
#### Henry Radman, Resp’t, *v. Jos. L.*Haberstro, App’lt.

*Wm. Armstrong,*for resp’t; *Geo. L. Kingston,*for app’lt.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Affirming 17 N. Y. State Rep., 497.
(Reap. Dec. 8780)

#### Misal Machinery, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 711435, etc.

(Decided April 5, 1957)

*Ouido Coen*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule of appeals, attached to and made part of the decision herein, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain items covered by said appeals, consisting of machines and machine tools imported from Italy.

It has been stipulated and agreed by the parties hereto that said merchandise was appraised on the basis of statutory foreign value. It was further stipulated and agreed that merchandise such as that here involved was sold and freely offered for sale, at the time of exportation, in Italy for home consumption in the ordinary course of trade to all purchasers and in the usual wholesale quantities at the figures indicated in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of this decision, for each individual item and the freely offered price for such items for exportation to the United States was no higher. It was also stipulated and agreed that the appeals for a reappraisement are abandoned as to all items not described in said schedule *“A.”*

*625Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the machines and machine tools in controversy and that such value is as shown on schedule “A,” attached to this decision.

The appeals for a reappraisement, insofar as they relate to items not described in said schedule *“A,”*having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Order filed, December 01, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00771-CV

____________

KRISEAN JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

MARSHA BROWN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-0076978

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 14, 2016. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Jana Fowler, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
UNITED TACONITE FLOW SHEET No. 6: Rev 2 (EXTERNAL) 

PELLET PLANT BALLING 

SCALE 

CONCENTRATE ' 

STORAGE BINS 

SCALE 

I BALLING DRUMS I 

ROLL SCREENS OVERSIZE 

oooo0 oooooon ~ BREAKER I 

UNDERSIZE I 

I RECIPROCATING CONVEYOR 

GRATE FEED 

SEE SHEET 7 

t, ~oo 

-:JO oO 

ROLL FEEDER 

UNDERSIZE 

<S 

FROM 

FILTERS 

EE SHEET 5)
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Fraud-waste-mismanagement: call, VA hotline, 800-488-8244

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Fraud-waste-mismanagement: call, VA hotline, 800-488-8244 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Veterans Affairs. Office of Inspector General 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of Veterans Affairs 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  025072467.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v GEORGE E. WARBLE, Basic Airman, U. S. Air Force, Appellant

12 USCMA 386, 30 CMR 386

No. 14,686

Decided April 28, 1961

*Colonel James L. Kilgore*and *Major Quincey W. Tucker, Jr.,*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel Merlin W. Baker*and *Major James Taylor, Jr.,*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PeR CuRiam:

The issues in this case relate to the sufficiency of specifications to allege, respectively, perjury and subornation of perjury. The perjury specification alleges that having taken a lawful oath in a summary court-martial to testify truly, the accused did “willfully, corruptly, and contrary to such oath” testify to certain material matters “which he did not then believe to be true.” Each of the two subornation specifications alleges that the accused procured an airman to commit perjury by inducing him to take an oath in a summary court-martial that he would testify truly but in fact would “testify willfully, corruptly, and contrary to such oath” in regard to material matters which he “did not then believe to be true.” The legal sufficiency of the perjury specification was considered in United States v Chaney, 12 USCMA 378, 30 CMR 378. For the reasons set out there, we hold the specifications are legally sufficient.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
# C_2007211EN.01000702.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 July 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative, Luxembourg) — État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg v Hans Ulrich Lakebrink, Katrin Peters-Lakebrink

(Case C-182/06) (1)

1

(Article 39 EC - Income tax payable by non residents - Calculation of tax rate - Properties in another Member State - Negative rental income not taken into account)

(2007/C 211/12)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour administrative, Luxembourg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Applicant:

Defendants: Hans Ulrich Lakebrink, Katrin Peters-Lakebrink

Defendants:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour administrative (Luxembourg) — Interpretation of Article 39 of the EC Treaty — National income tax arrangements in respect of non-resident Community nationals — Refusal to take account of negative rental income relating to property situated in another Member State for calculation of the tax rate

Operative part of the judgment

Article 39 EC is to be interpreted as precluding national legislation which does not entitle a Community national who is not resident in the Member State in which he receives income that constitutes the major part of his taxable income to request, for the purposes of determination of the tax rate applicable to the income so received, that negative rental income relating to property situated in another Member State which he does not himself occupy be taken into account, whilst a resident of the first State can request that such negative rental income be taken into account.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.

1

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8893 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements in 

the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs relating 

to burials, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2024 

Mr. JAMES (for himself, Mr. DELUZIO, Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. DAVIS of North 

Carolina, and Mr. LUTTRELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain 

improvements in the laws administered by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs relating to burials, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Veterans’ 

5 Legacy Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8893 IH

1 SEC. 2. HEADSTONES AND MARKERS FOR GROUPS OF INDI2 VIDUALS BURIED IN GROUP INTERMENTS. 

3 Section 2306 of title 38, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subsection (k) as sub6 section (l); and 

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (j) the fol8 lowing new subsection (k): 

9 ‘‘(k)(1) In lieu of a headstone or marker for an indi10 vidual under this section, the Secretary may furnish a sin11 gle appropriate headstone or marker for a group of indi12 viduals buried in a group interment if each individual of 

13 such group is eligible for a headstone or marker furnished 

14 under this section. 

15 ‘‘(2) The authority to furnish a headstone or marker 

16 under paragraph (1) shall terminate on the date that is 

17 seven years after the date of the enactment of the Pre18 serving Veterans’ Legacy Act of 2024.’’. 

19 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR BURIAL OF 

20 SPOUSES AND DEPENDENT CHILDREN WHO 

21 PREDECEASE VETERANS AND ACTIVE DUTY 

22 MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

23 Section 2402(a)(5) of title 38, United States Code, 

24 is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2024’’ and inserting 

25 ‘‘October 1, 2031’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9115 

To prohibit the Department of Defense from transporting Palestinian refugees 

to the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2024 

Mr. ARRINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Department of Defense from transporting 

Palestinian refugees to the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

4 TRANSPORT OF PALESTINIAN REFUGEES TO 

5 THE UNITED STATES. 

6 None of the fund authorized to be appropriated or 

7 otherwise made available to the Department of Defense 

8 may be made available for the operation of any aircraft 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9115 IH

1 of the Department of Defense to transport Palestinian ref2 ugees to the United States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 53130.

#### Brookside Distilling Products Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 123991-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (First Amendment) for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2004 of the Trust Created February 25, 1986 (the Trust) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers does hereby certify that to the best of his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                            
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          result of operations of the Trust.

| | Date:   December 17, 2004   | /s/ John A. Irwin
| | --------------------------- | -----------------
| | John A. Irwin              
| | Principal Executive Officer

| | Date:   December 17, 2004   | /s/ Lawrence J. Bolton
| | --------------------------- | ----------------------
| | Lawrence J. Bolton         
| | Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by
the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Van pool

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Van pool 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Veterans Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  171 × 49 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  VA1.16_V26.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Order entered February 4, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01397
- CV COREY STEELE, Appellant

V. UG NATIONAL, ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from the 68th Judi cial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 07861



### O RDER
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 (g)(3) and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1), we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later t han February 10, 2020, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of (1) the trial court’s docket sheet; (2) any fil ings by appellees concerning appellant’s statement of inability to pay costs; and, (3) any trial court order s concerning appellant’s ab ility to pay for costs on appeals

. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 34.5(c) ( 1); T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145(g)(3)

. If no order s exist, the trial court shall state so in writing.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 1 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 2 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 3 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 4 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 5 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 6 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 7 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 01/02/13 Page: 8 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T14:34:44-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO