alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Apathy hampers security

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Apathy hampers security 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Rev. 2-88. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Document ; 6728; Document (United States. Internal Revenue Service) ; 6728. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018806957.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Color your company's future bright; hire people with disabilities

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Color your company's future bright; hire people with disabilities 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  President's Committee on Employment of People With Disabilities 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  146 × 36 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  020010737.jpg; 020010737.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. '1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of TORCH EXECUTIVE SERVICES LTD. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Frank Torchia, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









| | /s/ Frank Torchia
Frank Torchia
Chief Executive and Financial Officer
March 12, 2004
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |
A90A0857.

#### BROWN v. THE STATE.

(393 SE2d 514)

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Matthew Brown, was convicted of theft by shoplifting a $4.97 bracelet at a Wal-Mart store.

While on a family shopping trip at the Wal-Mart in Waycross, the wayward Brown was observed by the store security employee, Leo Root, to remove a bracelet from the display rack, place it in his hip pocket, and depart the store. Root confronted Brown in the mall food court, and Brown, after first denying having the bracelet, retrieved it from his pocket. Root escorted Brown back to the store, called the police, and summoned Brown’s parents over the store intercom. Brown and his parents denied larcenous intent, and claimed that Brown had merely placed the bracelet in his pocket until the rest of the family was ready to check out of the store. *Held:*

At trial, Root identified the bracelet that he recovered from Brown, and explained that he had kept the bracelet in an individual *390sack, stored in a room to which only he had a key. The sack bore an evidence label identifying Brown, the date, Root, and the police officer who transported Brown to the police station. These items were admitted into evidence and allowed to go out with the jury over defense counsel’s objections that no proper foundation was laid for the bracelet, and that the sack was an impermissible written record of a witness’ testimony. Those objections form the bases of this appeal.

Decided April 16, 1990.

*C. Deen Strickland,*for appellant.

*Douglas Gibson, Solicitor,*for appellee.

The bracelet was a distinct and recognizable physical object, identifiable by the sense of observation, and admissible without the necessity of showing a chain of custody. *Harper v. State,*251 Ga. 183, 185 (1) (304 SE2d 693) (1983). Even if a chain of custody showing had been necessary, however, considering the nature of the bracelet and the security surrounding the storage of the item, that foundation was clearly met in this case. *Carson v. State,*241 Ga. 622 (247 SE2d 68) (1978).

The jury generally is not allowed to take written testimony into deliberations, because of the possible unfair advantage of repetition over oral testimony. *Royals v. State,*208 Ga. 78 (2) (65 SE2d 158) (1951). However, the sack in which the store security kept the bracelet, and which bore the evidence label, hardly amounted to written testimony that could work any prejudice against Brown.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.*
EXHIBIT 15.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.333-171434 on Form S-8 of our report dated May 23, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Xueda Education Group, its subsidiaries, its variable interest entity (the VIE) and its VIEs subsidiaries, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Xueda Education Group for the year ended December 31, 2010.  /s/Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd. Beijing, the Peoples Republic of China May 23, 2011
Exhibit 31.3

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

I, Timothy P. Walbert, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 3 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Horizon Pharma plc; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 26, 2017                             
|                                               
|/s/ Timothy P. Walbert                         
|Timothy P. Walbert                             
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
(Reap. Dec. 8747)

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp., by Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 14935, etc.

(Decided February 14, 1957)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A.,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the reappraisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A, which Schedule A is made a part of this stipulation, are limited to the binoculars and leather cases and straps specified in the said attached Schedule A.

> That at the time of exportation binoculars and leather cases and straps such as or similar to those identified in the attached Schedule A, were being freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States at the per piece prices specified in the attached Schedule A, U. S. dollars, plus easing and packing charges, freight to shipping port, storage, insurance premiums, lighterage and handling charges, and petties, as invoiced, which prices were higher than the foreign values as defined in Section 402 (c), Tariff Act of 1930.

> The reappraisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the binoculars, leather cases, and straps specified in said schedule *“A,”*and that such values were the per piece prices specified in said schedule “A,” plus casing and packing charges, freight to shipping port, storage, insurance premiums, lighter-age and handling charges, and petties, as invoiced.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 59121.

protests 192788-K, 192790-K, and 196054 (Galveston).

#### Stanolind Oil and Gas Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel A. P. I. casings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 32, C. D. 1577), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.-
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.13




Cing2587.A.005

Page 1 of 1




This Amendment cing2587.A.005, effective as of May 1, 2008 (“Effective Date”), between StarTek
USA, Inc. (“StarTek”), a Delaware corporation, and AT&T Mobility LLC, (“AT&T Mobility”) a Delaware
limited liability company, on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, amends the statement of work
described below.



RECITALS




WHEREAS, AT&T Wireless and StarTek entered into a Provider Master Service Agreement on January 1,
2002 (the “MSA”);



WHEREAS AT&T Wireless and StarTek executed Amendment No. 001 dated April 1, 2004 to the MSA
incorporating a Statement of Work (“SOW”) to provide services to AT&T Wireless;



WHEREAS AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. assigned its rights and delegated its duties under the MSA and
all statements of work thereunder to AT&T Mobility;



WHEREAS AT&T Mobility and StarTek desire to amend the term of the of the SOW;




NOW THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree
to amend the SOW as follows:




1. Section IV. “Term” of the SOW is hereby deleted in its entirety and it is replaced by the
following:




“IV. ‘Term’ This SOW shall begin on April 1, 2004 (“Effective Date”) and end on May 30,
2008.”




	 	2.	 	Except as amended by this Amendment, the SOW is not otherwise modified, revoked or
superseded and remain in full force and effect.






3. This amendment maintains services pending approval of a new work order.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this Amendment as of the effective date.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	StarTek USA, Inc.	 	 	 	AT&T Mobility LLC by its authorized	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Representative AT&T Services, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:


	 	/s/ Patrick M. Hayes
 


	 	 
	 	By:

	 	/s/ Richard Steadman
 


	 	 
	Printed Name: Patrick Hayes

	 	 	 	Printed Name: Richard Steadman	 	 
	Title:

	 	EVP & COO
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	AVP — Global Strategic Sourcing	 	 
	Date:

	 	4/30/08
	 	 	 	Date:
	 	30 April 2008	 	 






Proprietary Information




The information contained in this Agreement is not for use or disclosure outside AT&T Mobility,
StarTek, their affiliated companies and their third party representatives, except under written
Agreement by the contracting Parties.
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hemisphere Energy
Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Don Simmons, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|/s/ Don Simmons                       | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Don Simmons                           | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                      | 
|April 29, 2015                        | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Hemisphere Energy Corporation and will be retained by
Hemisphere Energy Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-21-00145-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 4

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0976642R

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

DAVID WAYNE BLACK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant David Wayne Black attempts to appeal his convictions for two 

counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and one count of violation of a 

protective order. Although the trial court imposed his sentences on October 5, 2005,

making any notice of appeal due November 4, 2005, he filed a notice of out-of-time 

appeal on October 20, 2021, seeking an extension to appeal and arguing that he may

collaterally attack his convictions because the sentences are void. See Tex. R. App. P. 

26.2(a), 26.3. We notified Black that we questioned our jurisdiction over his appeal 

given that his notice of appeal and extension request were filed sixteen years after his 

sentences had been imposed. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Black responded but other 

than reasserting his need for an extension, he has not further addressed our 

jurisdiction. 

If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, we have no choice but to dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2012) (citing Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)); cf. Mizell v. 

State, 119 S.W.3d 804, 806 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (holding trial or appellate court 

may correct illegal sentence if the court “otherwise has jurisdiction” over the 

conviction). Black’s exclusive remedy at this point is by way of a post-conviction writ 

of habeas corpus, not a direct appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3; 

see also id. § 5 (providing that after final conviction, habeas corpus procedure is 
3

“exclusive”). Thus, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 43.2(f).

/s/ Brian Walker

Brian Walker

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: February 3, 2022
Exhibit 4.5-B

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                           GULF POWER CAPITAL TRUST IV

         THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of Gulf Power Capital Trust IV (the "Trust"),
dated April 25, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as
trustee of the Trust, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust
Act (12 Del. C. ss. 3801, et seq.).

         1. Name. The name of the business trust being formed hereby is Gulf
Power Capital Trust IV.

         2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware are Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, 1201 Market Street, Wilmington,
Delaware 19801.

         3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of
its filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the
Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above
written.

                                   CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                   NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
                                   as Trustee

                                   By:
                                      --------------------------------
                                      Name:    John J. Cashin
                                      Title:   Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6642]



[[Page 17980]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), pursuant to the 
Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development Act of 1999 
(Pub. L. 106-50), SBA Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs 
will host a public federal meeting on Tuesday, April 24, 2007. The 
meeting will take place at the SBA, 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20416, starting at 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. The meeting will be held in the 
Eisenhower Conference Room, Side B; located on the 2nd floor. The 
purpose of this meeting is to focus on SBA's services, programs and 
outreach for veterans and service-disabled veterans.
    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Cheryl Clark, Program Liaison 
in the Office of Veterans Business Development at (202) 205-6773 or 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8eede6ebfcf7e2a0ede2effce5cefdecefa0e9e1f8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e6858e83949f8ac8858a87948da6958487c8818990">[email protected]</span></a>.

Matthew Teague,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-6642 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the Third Division,

June 9, 1955

No. 59132.

protests 168696-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ANDRAY COTTLE,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 557 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.