alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,884]


C.A. Lawton Company, Machinery Division; De Pere, WI; Dismissal 
of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at C.A. Lawton Company, Machinery 
Division, De Pere, Wisconsin. The application did not contain new 
information supporting a conclusion that the determination was 
erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration 
of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the 
application was issued.

TA-W-60,884; C.A. Lawton Company, Machinery Division, De Pere, 
Wisconsin, (April 2, 2007)


    Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of April 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-6660 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**GAO-03-360R**                      Published: Jan 23, 2003. Publicly Released: Jan 23, 2003.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

We evaluated fiscal year 2002 activity affecting distributions to the Highway Trust Fund (HTF).

## Full Report

Full Report (18 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Transportation

Excise taxesFinancial recordsTrust fundsGasolineGasoholTaxpayersTax returnsFinancial statementsMass transitAgreed-upon procedures
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Get inside the great outdoors, access to your national forests

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Get inside the great outdoors, access to your national forests 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Forest Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 91-640-P. "April 1991." "FS 487." 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 33.1







Management’s Assessment on Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Criteria




Management of Hyundai Capital America (the Company)  is responsible for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of auto receivable backed security transactions serviced by the Company and issued on or after January 1, 2006 (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iv), 1122(d)(3)(iii)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ix)-(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Reporting Period).  With respect to Applicable Servicing Criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(iii), there were no activities performed during the year ended December 31, 2010 with respect to the Platform, because there was no occurrences of the events that would require the Company to perform activities.




With respect to servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv), management has engaged a vendor to perform specific, limited or scripted activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company’s management has determined that this vendor is not considered a “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company’s management has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to the vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations (“Interpretation 17.06”). Management has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendor’s activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to the vendor. The Company’s management is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendor and related criteria.




The Company’s management has assessed the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.




Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company has complied in all material respects with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of the Platform.




KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010.







/s/ MIN SOK RANDY PARKMin Sok Randy ParkActing Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 18, 2011
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v HAROLD L. ANDERSON, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

No. 30,215

July 25, 1975

*Lieutenant Colonel James Kucera, Captain Paul C. Hemmer,*and *Captain John R. Osgood*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Donald W Hansen*was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

The conviction of this appellant by a special court-martial of three specifications of assault and battery in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 928, has resulted in a sentence which, as approved and affirmed below, includes a bad-conduct discharge.

When initially forwarding these charges to tjie convening authority, the appellant’s battalion commander, a lieutenant colonel,' recommended that the appellant be eliminated from the service and that he be tried by a special court-martial authorized to adjudge a bad-conduct discharge. Later, however, this same officer appeared as a defense witness and testified on appellant’s behalf during the sentencing portion of the trial. After relating various matters favorable to the appellant, the battalion commander further explained:

> [Djuring my visitations [to the stockade], I began to develop reservations about submission of a request for a BCD. After I looked at the charge sheet I felt I was obligated by the Code to go ahead and do that. . . . The man has the possibility to be a good soldier.

Thereafter, the military judge, when announcing the imposed sentence, specifically indicated that he was relying heavily on the testimony of the battalion *502commander in making a concurrent recommendation to the convening authority that the bad-conduct discharge portion of his adjudged sentence be suspended.

Although the review of the staff judge advocate in this case noted the military judge’s recommendation for suspension and adequately summarized much of the favorable testimony offered by the appellant’s battalion commander, no mention was made about that portion of the battalion commander’s testimony which set forth his reasons for his original recommendation and his subsequent reservations thereof. In view of the recommendation of the military judge to suspend the bad-conduct discharge, which was directly predicated at least in material part upon that testimony so omitted from the review, we find this to be prejudicial error. *See United States v Arnold,*21 USCMA 151, 44 CMR 205 (1972); *United States v Rivera,*20 USCMA 6, 42 CMR 198 (1970).

The decision of the Army Court of Military Review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for a new post-trial review and action by a different convening authority.
# C_2007140EN.01003302.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/33

---

Action brought on 20 April 2007 — Allos Walter Lang v OHIM — Kokoriko (Coco Rico)

(Case T-126/07)

(2007/C 140/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Allos Walter Lang (Mariendrebber, Germany) (represented by: H. Heldt, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant(s):

Other party in the proceedings before the OHIM: KOKORIKO Ltda.

Other party in the proceedings before the OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Suspension of proceedings until final determination on the actions for annulment pending before the OHIM in cases 2069 C and 2070 C; |
| --- | --- |

—

Suspension of proceedings until final determination on the actions for annulment pending before the OHIM in cases 2069 C and 2070 C;

| — | Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division on 31 May 2006 reference number B 696684 and the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 16 February 2007, reference number R 1047/2006-2 and reference of the matter back to the Opposition Division for reconsideration. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division on 31 May 2006 reference number B 696684 and the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 16 February 2007, reference number R 1047/2006-2 and reference of the matter back to the Opposition Division for reconsideration.

| — | OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark in question: The word mark ‘Coco Rico’ for goods in Class 30 (Application No 2 949 899).

Community trade mark in question:

Proprietor of the trade marks relied upon in opposition: KOKORIKO Ltda.

Proprietor of the trade marks relied upon in opposition:

Trade marks relied upon in opposition: The work mark ‘KOKORIKO’ (Community Trade Mark No 101 386) for goods and services in Classes 29, 30 and 42, and the figurative mark ‘KOKORIKO’ (Community Trade Mark No 101 626) for goods and services in Classes 29, 30 and 42.

Trade marks relied upon in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld and application for registration dismissed.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Grounds of appeal: In making its decision, the Opposition Division failed to take account of applicant's claim for annulment of the marks relied on in opposition. In the submission of the applícant, there is no further obstacle under Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) to the registration being sought by the applicant in the event of the opposing marks being annulled.

Grounds of appeal:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community Trade Mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

1

---
#### Morny Sales Co. *v.*United States

No. 6351.

Entry No. 762453, etc.

Invoices dated Perivale, England, April 4, 1941, etc.

Certified April 9, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 16, 1941, etc.

(Decided September 18, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff .

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2007276EN.01000302.xml

| 17.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4935 — Petronas/Selenia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 276/03)

On 8 November 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4935. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4935. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Think before you shake, the natural way is a better way

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Think before you shake, the natural way is a better way 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Food and Drug AdministrationNational Urban League 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Food and Drug Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  HHS pub. ; no. (FDA) 84-2189; HHS publication ; no. (FDA) 84-2189. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  139 × 27 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019114060.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 58158.

petition 7119-R (New York).

#### Jerome L. Miller *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was established that the importer, the Ideal Toy Corp., had an agreement with the Government examiner that it would have an opportunity to amend entries upon musical movements; that the merchandise in question was purchased in the name of the president of the corporation, rather than in the corporate name; and that when the examiner was given all of the information which the importer had obtained from the shipper as to the value, the examiner sent notices to amend the other entries but not the entry in question, because he did not realize that this entry was part of the same shipments to the Ideal Toy Corp. From the evidence presented, it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to mislead the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Order entered October 9, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00739-CV

GALLERIA MALL INVESTORS LP, Appellant

V.

GT DALLAS PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-05581

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s October 4, 2013 status report regarding settlement and 

agreed second motion for extension. The Court GRANTS the motion, ABATES this appeal 

until December 3, 2013, and EXTENDS the deadline for filing the Clerk’s record until 

December 27, 2013. The Court further ORDERS appellant to file, on or before December 3, 

2013, either (1) a status report regarding settlement, or (2) a motion to dismiss the appeal.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE