alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 30, 2013

p1030 

# Order

Clerk October 30, 2013

147877 & (27)

TOM BARROW,

Plaintiff,

and

CITIZENS UNITED AGAINST CORRUPT

GOVERNMENT and D. MICHELLE WHITE,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 147877

COA: 317540

Wayne CC: 13

- 008926

- AW

CITY OF DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION,

CITY CLERK FOR THE CITY OF DETROIT,

MICHAEL DUGGAN, and MICHAEL DUGGAN

FOR MAYOR COMMITTEE,

Defendants

- Appell ees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions

presented will cause a “delay in final adjudication . . . likely to cause substantial harm” or

that “the appeal is from a ruling that a provision of the Michigan Constitution, a

Michigan statute, a rule or regulation inclu ded in the Michigan Administrative Code, or

any other action of the legislative or executive branch of state government is invalid.”

MCR 7.302(B)(4). The question of awarding costs is reserved until further order of the

Court.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6336]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Application of Vision Airlines, Inc., for Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order To Show Cause (Order 2007-3-24) Docket OST-
2004-19518.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Vision 
Airlines, Inc. fit, willing, and able, and awarding it a certificate of 
public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate scheduled air 
transportation of persons, property, and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket OST-2004-19518 and addressed to U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room PL-401), 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the 
parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damon D. Walker, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-7785.

    Dated: March 30, 2007.
Andrew B. Steinberg,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. E7-6336 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
# C_2007304EN.01000202.xml

| 15.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4914 — Carlyle/Sequa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 304/03)

On 18 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4914. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4914. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
No. 52749.

protests 48631-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Fay On Chong & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the articles the subject of *Rolls Razor,*
      *261Inc. v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 480) and Abstract 51306. The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
12/4/02 INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT
Case Number: P030106 Assessor: Libelo ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: 480.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: 12. 0. Per Site Release: 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:

Consumer use expected?INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P030106 SIC-CODE BASED HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES SCENARIO #:1 RELEASE ACTIVITY: SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: SIC-CODE (S): EXPOSED POPULATION:Adult

WASTE WATER TREATMENT REMOVAL (%) COC (μg/L) RELEASE DAYS PRE-TREATMENT RELEASE

(kg/day) POST-TREATMENT RELEASE

(kg/day) BCF (L/kg) 90. 50.00 12. 4. 0.40 0.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER PLANT TYPE % ILE FACILITY STREAM FLOW (MLD) STREAM CONC. ( μg/l) Harmonic

MEAN 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 Harmonic MEAN 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 ALL 50 489.91 172.30 113.57 92.62 0.82 2.32 3.52 4.32 ALL 10 49.87 22.80 13.99 11.58 8.02 17.54 28.59 34.54

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES Exposure Units Drinking Water Results Drinking Water Units Fish Ingestion Results Fish Ingestion

Units 50% 10% 50% 10% Cancer LADD pot 2.09E-07 2.06E-06 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day LADC pot1.07E-05 1.05E-04 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg Chronic Non-Cancer ADD pot 5.23E-07 5.14E-06 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day ADC pot2.68E-05 2.64E-04 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg Acute ADR pot 1.94E-04 1.47E-03 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/dayINITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER: P030106

SIC CODE EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 1 RELEASE ACTIVITY: SIC CODE DESCRIPTION: ASSOCIATED SIC CODES: SIC CODE RESULTS COC ( μg/L) % yr exceeded Days/yr exceeded Release days/year Loading (kg/site/day) Waste Water Treatment (%) High/Avg Analysis 50.00 0.18 1 12 4.00 90.00 High
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               jun-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                          3,858,213
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   9,561,621
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     1,782,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                15,769,734
<PP&E>                          572,771
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  16,657,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,734,828
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        74,695
<OTHER-SE>                      12,835,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    16,657,220
<SALES>                         13,664,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                13,664,999
<CGS>                           11,984,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   13,592,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (73,425)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 146,266
<INCOME-TAX>                    49,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             97,266
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    97,266
<EPS-BASIC>                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.02



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of DMH International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon-Marc Garcia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Jon-Marc Garcia By: Jon-Marc Garcia Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: October 12, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007263EN.01002001.xml

| 6.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/20

---

Corrigendum to LIFE+ call for proposals 2007

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 232 of 4 October 2007
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 232 of 4 October 2007

(2007/C 263/09)

On page 12, ‘More information’, last line:

for:

for:

‘http://ec.europa.eu/environment/crime/index.htm’,

read:

read:

‘http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/contact/nationalcontact/index.htm’.

---
(Reap. Dec. 10221)

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., a/c Fadex Commercial Corp., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1810, etc.

(Decided April 5, 1962)

*William Whynman*for the plaintiffs.

*WilUam H. Orriolc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Bao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, listed in the schedule of reappraisements annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the imported merchandise consists of automobiles, manufactured in and exported from Germany on the dates herein relevant, and described on the invoices as U.S. Isetta or Isetta 300, 1 tone (one color) and 2 tones (2 colors), and also U.S. Isetta 600 or BMW Isetta 600, 1 tone (one color) and 2 tones (2 colors) together with accessories and spare parts.

> 2. That on the relevant dates of exportation, there was no foreign, export, or U.S. value, as each of such values is defined in Section 402 (c), (d) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the imported merchandise above described.

> 3. That on the relevant dates of exportation, the proper basis of value of the automobiles above described was the cost of production, as such value is *615defined in Section 402(f) of said Tariff Act, and as stated in Schedule A hereto attached and made a part hereof.

> 4. That as to the accessories not already included in the cost figures shown in the said schedule and separately appraised, the proper basis of value is the cost of production, which is equal to the value stated on the invoice.

> 6. If not included in the cost of production of each automobile, the appraised value of the following items shall be added thereto: White wall tires, sliding roof, luggage carrier, tandem windshield wipers, front vents, and any other items not included in the cost of each car.

> The said appeals are submitted herewith for decision upon this stipulation and are abandoned as to all items not included and referred to above.

On the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered by said appeals and that such values were as follows:

1. For the automobiles covered by said appeals, the values'stated in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof.

2. For the accessories not already included in the cost figures shown in the said schedule and separately appraised the value stated on the invoice.

3. For the following items, if not included in the cost of production of each automobile, the appraised value is to be added thereto: White wall tires, sliding roof, luggage carrier, tandem windshield wipers, front vents, and any other items not included in the cost of each car.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Criminal law, piracy, United States v Jean Lafitte

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Criminal law, piracy, United States v Jean Lafitte 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Archives and Records Administration in cooperation with the Committee on the Bicentennial of the Constitution of the Judicial Conference of the United States 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Laffite, Jean 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  Louisiana 
                    -           Town        
                    -  New Orleans 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  192 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  PostersMaps 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  023261452.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 924 

To prohibit the Corps of Engineers from issuing a permit for the Delta 

Conveyance Project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. HARDER of California (for himself, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. THOMPSON of 

California, and Mr. GARAMENDI) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Corps of Engineers from issuing a permit 

for the Delta Conveyance Project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop the Delta Tunnel 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DELTA CONVEYANCE PROJECT 

7 PERMIT. 

8 The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief 

9 of Engineers, may not issue a permit under section 404 

10 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 924 IH

1 1344) relating to the Delta Conveyance Project described 

2 in the document published by the Corps of Engineers enti3 tled ‘‘Delta Conveyance Project Draft Environmental Im4 pact Statement’’ and dated December 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
---

Exhibit 99.13

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year
ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 40-F) of Timmins Gold Corp. (Timmins), I,
Brent C. Bailey, Professional Engineer, hereby consent to the use of my name in
connection with the references to the technical report entitled Preliminary
Economic Assessment Caballo Blanco Gold Heap Leach, Veracruz, Mexico
readdressed to Timmins on January 28, 2015, with an effective date as of May 7,
2012 (the Technical Report) and to the incorporation by reference of
references to, and summaries of, the Technical Report in the Form 40-F.

/s/ Brent C. Bailey,
P.E.Name: Brent C. Bailey, Professional Engineer

March 25, 2015

---
The web site for the U.S. Department of Transportatin Federal Transit Administration makes heavy use of Java and Teleport Pro was unable to replicate the functionality. All Annual Funding Recommendations from 1997 - 2014 have been captured. Please see lps4322_annual_funding_recommendations.png for a list of the files where these documents can be found.
**Exhibit 8.1**

**LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

First Base Investment Limited (BVI) 

KeyCorp Limited (BVI) 

Sky Trillion Limited (BVI) 

King Venture Limited (BVI) 

Tech Sino Limited (BVI) 

Asiatech Holdings Limited (BVI) 

Wiser Tyson Investment Corp. Limited (BVI) 

Rich Wind Energy TwoCorp. (BVI) 

Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Industry Group Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Tianjin Mingyang Wind Power Blade Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Zhongshan Mingyang Wind Power Blade Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Jilin Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

ShuangliaoMingyang New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Taonan Mingyang New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Baicheng Mingyang New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Da’an Mingyang New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

MingYang Renewable (HK) Co., Limited (Hong Kong) 

Jiangsu Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Tianjin Mingyang Wind Power Equipment Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

ZhongshanMingyang Wind Power Equipment Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Ming Yang Wind Power Investment Holding (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co., Limited (Hong Kong) 

Gansu Mingyang New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

ZhongshanRuiyang Investment Management Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Guizhou Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Guangdong Mingyang New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

YunnanMingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Inner Mongolia Ming Yang New Energy Development Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Gaozhou Mingyang New Energy Investment Development Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Tianjin Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

MingyangHoldings (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) 

Ming Yang Wind Power USA Inc. (USA) 

Ming Yang Wind Power European R&D Center ApS (Denmark) 

MingYang Renewable Energy (International) Company Limited (Hong Kong) 

Shandong Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Burqin Mingyang Wind Power Sales Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Xinhua XingyangWind Power Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Dongyuan Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Rich Offshore Engineering Ltd. (PRC) 

Sheyang Mingyang New EnergyTechnology Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Qinghai Mingyang New Energy Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Beijing Jieyuan Xinneng Investment Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Hami MingyangNew Energy Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Xilin Gol League Mingyang New Energy Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Henan Tianrun Wind Power Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Shaanxi DingbianJieyuan New Energy Co., Ltd. (PRC) 

Shaanxi Jingbian Mingyang New Energy Co., Ltd. (PRC)
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certifications

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   | Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of TransNet
 Corporation (the Company) hereby certify to such officers knowledge that:
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|1. | The
 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period ended
 March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                            
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | The
 information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                                                            

|                         | 
|------------------------ | 
|/s/ Steven
 J. Wilk      | 
|                         | 
|Steven J.
 Wilk          | 
|Chief
 Executive Officer | 
|                         | 
|Date: May
 23, 2011      | 
|                         | 
|/s/ John J.
 Wilk        | 
|                         | 
|John J. Wilk             | 
|Chief
 Financial Officer | 
|                         | 
|Date: May
 23, 2011      | 

---
Before the Third Division,

April 22, 1952

No. 56574.

protest 113994-K (St. Albans).

#### C. S. Emery & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919), the claim for free entry was sustained.