alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2000-2004 Baseline Conditions 2018 Uniform Rate of Progress Target 2064 Natural ConditionsAmm. Sulfate 4.9 3.8 0.8Amm. Nitrate 1.6 1.4 0.8OMC 11.6 9.8 4.6EC 1.9 1.5 0.4Soil 0.9 0.9 0.9CM 2.9 3 3.4Sea Salt 0 0 0Difference3.4 12.9Total 23.8 20.4 10.9Note: Actual Reduction NeededNumber in the bar graph comes from Visibility Modeling on HazePlanning (TSS)and equals 2000-2004 Baseline minus the 2018 URP Goal.The "Difference" Number in Columns C and D are the differencesbetween the total number in the baseline conditions and URG andNatural Conditions.This number is merely used in order to manipulate the reduction needed area in the chart so that it equals the same height as the baseline graph.303540

)North Absaroka and Washakie Wilderness AreasNOAB1 IMPROVE Site (New IMPROVE Algorithm)ReductionNeeded =1.1 dv051015202530354020002004 Baseline Conditions2018 Uniform Rate of Progress2064 Natural Conditions

Extinction (Mm

-1 )North Absaroka and Washakie Wilderness AreasNOAB1 IMPROVE Site (New IMPROVE Algorithm)Sea SaltCMSoilECOMCAmm. NitrateAmm. SulfateReductionNeeded =1.1 dvReduction Needed=4.7 dv05101520253035402000-2004 Baseline Conditions 2018 Uniform Rate of ProgressTarget2064 Natural Conditions

Extinction (Mm

-1 )North Absaroka and Washakie Wilderness AreasNOAB1 IMPROVE Site (New IMPROVE Algorithm)Sea SaltCMSoilECOMCAmm. NitrateAmm. SulfateReductionNeeded =1.1 dvReduction Needed=4.7 dvSite Year bCM|Base bCM|Inc bCM|NCII bEC|Base bEC|Inc bEC|NCII bNO3|Base bNO3|Inc bNO3|NCII bOMC|BaseNOAB1 2000 2.91 1.86 1.61 11.64NOAB1 2001 2.91 1.86 1.61 11.64NOAB1 2002 2.91 1.86 1.61 11.64NOAB1 2003 2.91 1.86 1.61 11.64NOAB1 2004 2.91 2.91 1.86 1.86 1.61 1.61 11.64NOAB1 20082.94 1.76 1.55NOAB1 20132.98 1.63 1.47NOAB1 20183.03 1.51 1.4NOAB1 20233.07 1.39 1.33NOAB120283.121.271.26NOAB1 20333.16 1.15 1.18NOAB1 20383.2 1.03 1.11NOAB1 20433.25 0.92 1.04NOAB1 20483.29 0.8 0.97NOAB1 20533.34 0.69 0.9NOAB1 20583.38 0.58 0.83NOAB1 20643.44 3.44 0.44 0.44 0.75 0.75% change from baselinebOMC|Inc bOMC|NCII bSO4|Base bSO4|Inc bSO4|NCII bSoil|Base bSoil|Inc bSoil|NCII bSs|Base bSs|Inc bSs|NCIINO3Extinction|prp18aSO4Extinction|prp18aOMCExtinction|prp18aECExtinction|prp18aCMExtinction|prp18aSoilExtinction|prp18aSeaSaltExtinction|prp18a4.87 0.85 0.014.87 0.85 0.014.87 0.85 0.014.87 0.85 0.0111.64 4.87 4.87 0.85 0.85 0.01 0.0111.08 4.56 0.85 0.0110.41 4.18 0.86 0.019.75 3.8 0.86 0.01 1.35 4.48 11.18 1.59 2.91 0.96 0.019.11 3.44 0.87 0.018.53.090.880.027.91 2.75 0.88 0.027.33 2.41 0.89 0.026.77 2.09 0.9 0.026.23 1.77 0.9 0.025.71 1.46 0.91 0.035.21 1.16 0.92 0.034.62 4.62 0.81 0.81 0.92 0.92 0.03 0.03-16.15 -8.01 -3.95 -14.52 0 12.94 0
EXHIBIT 12.1 CERTIFICATION I, Qiming Xu, certify that:  1.

   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Xiniya Fashion Limited (the “Company”);
  2.

   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.

   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.

   The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
  (a)

   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)

   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)

   Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.

   The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)

   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)

   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: April 3, 2013  /s/ Qiming XuName:     Qiming XuTitle:       Chief Executive Officer


---
# C ou r t

of A p p e al s

of t h e S t at e of

G e or gi a

A

T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s h e r e b y p a s s e s t h e f o l l o w i n g o r d e r :

A 1 7 D 0 4 9 4

. W

A L L O B H E

B E L v

. K A T H E R I N E I

. H E

R C Z E G

.

O n A p r i l 4

, 2 0 1 7

, t

h e t r i a l c o u r t e n t e r e d a n o r d e r d e n

y i n g W a l l o b H e b e l ’ s

p e t i t i o n f o r l e g i t i m a t i o n

. O n M a

y 1

, 2 0 1 7

, H e b e l f

i l e d a m o t i o n f o r e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e

t o f i l e a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y a p p e a l i n t h i s C o u r t t o c h a l l e n g e t h e t r i a l c o u r t ’ s

o r d e r

. W e g

r a n t e d H e b e l ’ s m o t i o n a n d d i r e c t e d t h a t h e f i l e h i s a p p l i c a t i o n n o l a t e r

t h a n J u n e 6

, 2 0 1 7

. S e e C a s e N o

. A 1 7 E 0 0 5 0

, d e c i d e d M a y 2

, 2 0 1 7

. H e b e l f

i l e d h i s

a p p l i c a t i o n o n J u n e 8

, 2 0 1 7

. W e

, h o w e v e r

, l a c k j u r i s d i c t i o n

.

O C G A § 5

- 6

- 3 9 ( a ) ( 5 ) p e r

m i t s t h i s C o u r t t o g r a n t a n e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e f o r f i l i n g

a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y a p p e a l

, w h e r e

, a s i n t h i s c a s e

, t

h e r e q u e s t i s m a d e

“ b e f o r e e x p i r a t i o n o f t h e p e r i o d f o r f i l i n g a s o r i g i n a l l y p r e s c r i b e d o r a s e x

t e n d e d b y

a p e r m i s s i b l e p r e v i o u s o r d e r

. ” O C G

A § 5

- 6

- 3 9 ( d ) ; S e e a l s o G a b l e v

. S t a t e

, 2 9 0 G a

.

8 1

, 8 4

- 8 5 ( 2 ) ( a ) ( 7 2 0 S E 2 d 1 7 0 ) ( 2 0 1 1 )

. I n t h e o r d e r g r a n t i n g H e b e l a

n e x t e n s i o n

, t h i s

C o u r t r e q u i r e d h i m t o f i l e h i s a p p l i c a t i o n b y J u n e 6

, 2 0 1 7

, w

h i c h h e d i d n o t d o

. F i

l i n g

d e a d l i n e s a r e j u r i s d i c t i o n a l

, a n d t h i s C o u r t i s u n a b l e t o a c c e p t a

n u n t i m e l y a p p l i c a t i o n

.

S e e C r o s s o n v

. C

o n w a y

, 2 9 1 G a

. 2 2 0 ( 1 ) ( 7 2 8 S E 2 d 6 1 7 ) ( 2 0 1 2 )

. B e c a u s e H e b e l

f a i l e d t o f i l e h i s a p p l i c a t i o n w i t h i n t h e t i m e p r o s c r i

b e d b y t h e C o u r t ’ s o r d e r

, w e l

a c k

j u r i s d i c t i o n t o c o n s i

d e r h i s a p p l i c a t i o n

, a n d i t i s h e r e b y D I S M I S S E D

.

June 28, 2017C o u r t o f Ap p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e

,

At l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i

s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f Ap p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r

t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w

r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 06/28/2017
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|                                                             |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  | 
|/s/   Roy T. K. Thung
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2006 |  |  | 





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



1
(Reap. Dec. 8925)

Entry No. 2770, etc.

#### Raymond H. Hamson et al. *v.*United States

(Decided July 23, 1957)

*Henry L. Ziegel*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*585Lawrence, Judge:

The question of the proper value for dutiable purposes of certain bicycles, imported from England, is the subject of the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule of reappraisement appeals, attached to and made part of the decision herein.

The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that, on or about the dates of exportation, merchandise such or similar to that involved in said appeals was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers' in the principal markets of England for export to the United States, nor for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of England for home consumption, nor was it freely offered in the United States for sale for domestic consumption. It was further stipulated and agreed that the values set forth in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of this decision, represent the cost of production for the items enumerated therein, as such value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)).

Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis of value for the bicycles in issue and that said value is as shown in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made part of this decision.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of PinstripesNYC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford Teller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Clifford Teller

Clifford Teller

Principal Executive Officer

June 28, 2011
Docket Number FAA-2014-0484
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# In some way, at some point in life, everybody needs help: supplemental security income

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  In some way, at some point in life, everybody needs help: supplemental security income 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Social Security Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  025147643.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2007211EN.01001402.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/14

---

Action brought on 7 June 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-273/07)

(2007/C 211/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky and D. Kukovec, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| 1. | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005 amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement (1), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive;
  In the alternative: | declare that, by failing to notify the Commission of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005 amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005 amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement (1), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive;

1

In the alternative:

declare that, by failing to notify the Commission of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005 amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive;

| 2. | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of Directive 2005/51/EC expired on 31 January 2006.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 257, p. 127.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8717 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8717

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 20 West Main Street in Santaquin, Utah, as the ``SGT Bill Hooser 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2024

 Mr. Owens (for himself, Mr. Curtis, Ms. Maloy, and Mr. Moore of Utah) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 20 West Main Street in Santaquin, Utah, as the ``SGT Bill Hooser 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT BILL HOOSER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 20 West Main Street in Santaquin, Utah, shall be known and 
designated as the ``SGT Bill Hooser Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``SGT Bill 
Hooser Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
|<DOCUMENT><TYPE>EX-16.1<SEQUENCE>2<FILENAME>l08496aexv16w1.txt<DESCRIPTION>EXHIBIT 16.1<TEXT><PAGE>
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|EXHIBIT 16.1
|------------



|July 6, 2004
|------------



|Securities and Exchange CommissionMail Stop
      11-3450 5th Street, NorthwestWashington, D.C.
    20549
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dear Sirs/Madams:
|-----------------

We
have read Item 4 of Cartoon Acquisition, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
July 2, 2004, and have the following comments:

1.
We agree with the statements made in (i) the first sentence of paragraph 1, (ii)
paragraph 2 and (iii) paragraph 3.

2.
We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with the statement made in the
second sentence of paragraph 1.



|Yours truly,
|------------



|/s/ Berger Apple & Associates
  Ltd.
|------------------------------------



|Berger Apple & Associates
Ltd.
|------------------------------

</TEXT> </DOCUMENT>

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9053 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9053

To require notification of lack of basis for the Secretary of Veterans 
 Affairs to have transmitted certain information to the Department of 
   Justice for use by the national instant criminal background check 
                                system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2024

  Mr. Crane (for himself and Mr. Rosendale) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require notification of lack of basis for the Secretary of Veterans 
 Affairs to have transmitted certain information to the Department of 
   Justice for use by the national instant criminal background check 
                                system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans 2nd Amendment Restoration 
Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF LACK OF BASIS FOR THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS TO HAVE TRANSMITTED CERTAIN INFORMATION TO THE 
              DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR USE BY THE NATIONAL INSTANT 
              CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall, within 30 days of 
enactment of this Act, and in accordance with section 40901(e)(1)(D) of 
title 34, United States Code, notify the Attorney General that the 
transmittal by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, of personally 
identifiable information of a beneficiary, solely on the basis of a 
determination by the Secretary to pay benefits to a fiduciary for the 
use and benefit of the beneficiary under section 5502 of this title 38, 
United States Code, to any entity in the Department of Justice, for use 
by the national instant criminal background check system established 
under section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, was 
improper under the law because such individuals were not adjudicated as 
a mental defective under 18 U.S.C. 922(g).
                                 <all>
```