2556 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of a limited exclusion order or 

cease and desist order or both directed 

against the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 11, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–670 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–404–408 and 

731–TA–898–908 (Review)] 

Hot-Rolled Steel Products From 

Argentina, China, India, Indonesia, 

Kazakhstan, Netherlands, Romania, 

South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and 

Ukraine 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year 

reviews concerning the countervailing 

duty orders on hot-rolled steel products 

from Argentina, India, Indonesia, South 

Africa, and Thailand and the 

antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled 

steel products from Argentina, China, 

India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, 

Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, 

Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of full reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) 

(the Act) to determine whether 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

orders on hot-rolled steel products from 

Argentina, India, Indonesia, South 

Africa, and Thailand and the 

antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled 

steel products from Argentina, China, 

India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, 

Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, 

Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. The 

Commission has determined to exercise 

its authority to extend the review period 

by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). For further information 

concerning the conduct of these reviews 

and rules of general application, consult 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 11, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background. On November 6, 2006, 

the Commission determined that 

responses to its notice of institution of 

the subject five-year reviews were such 

that full reviews pursuant to section 

751(c)(5) of the Act should proceed (71 

FR 67366, November 21, 2006). A record 

of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements are available from the Office 

of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

Participation in the reviews and 

public service list. Persons, including 

industrial users of the subject 

merchandise and, if the merchandise is 

sold at the retail level, representative 

consumer organizations, wishing to 

participate in these reviews as parties 

must file an entry of appearance with 

the Secretary to the Commission, as 

provided in section 201.11 of the 

Commission’s rules, by 45 days after 

publication of this notice. A party that 

filed a notice of appearance following 

publication of the Commission’s notice 

of institution of the reviews need not 

file an additional notice of appearance. 

The Secretary will maintain a public 

service list containing the names and 

addresses of all persons, or their 

representatives, who are parties to the 

reviews. 

Limited disclosure of business 

proprietary information (BPI) under an 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and BPI service list. Pursuant to section 

207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the 

Secretary will make BPI gathered in 

these reviews available to authorized 

applicants under the APO issued in the 

reviews, provided that the application is 

made by 45 days after publication of 

this notice. Authorized applicants must 

represent interested parties, as defined 

by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to 

the reviews. A party granted access to 

BPI following publication of the 

Commission’s notice of institution of 

the reviews need not reapply for such 

access. A separate service list will be 

maintained by the Secretary for those 

parties authorized to receive BPI under 

the APO. 

Staff report. The prehearing staff 

report in the reviews will be placed in 

the nonpublic record on August 29, 

2007, and a public version will be 

issued thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.64 of the Commission’s rules. 

Hearing. The Commission will hold a 

two-day hearing in connection with the 

reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on 

September 19 and 20, 2007, at the U.S. 

International Trade Commission 

Building. Requests to appear at the 

hearing should be filed in writing with 

the Secretary to the Commission on or 

before September 5, 2007, so that the 

Commission may determine the level of 

interest in the two days of hearings. A 

nonparty who has testimony that may 

aid the Commission’s deliberations may 

request permission to present a short 

statement at the hearing. All parties and 

nonparties desiring to appear at the 

hearing and make oral presentations 

should attend a prehearing conference 

to be held at 9:30 a.m. on September 14, 

2007, at the U.S. International Trade 

Commission Building. Oral testimony 

and written materials to be submitted at 

the public hearing are governed by 

sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, 

and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules. 

Parties must submit any request to 

present a portion of their hearing 

testimony in camera no later than 7 

business days prior to the date of the 

hearing. 

Written submissions. Each party to the 

reviews may submit a prehearing brief 

to the Commission. Prehearing briefs 

must conform with the provisions of 

section 207.65 of the Commission’s 

rules; the deadline for filing is 

September 10, 2007. Parties may also 

file written testimony in connection 

with their presentation at the hearing, as 

provided in section 207.24 of the 

Commission’s rules, and posthearing 

briefs, which must conform with the 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices 2557 

provisions of section 207.67 of the 

Commission’s rules. The deadline for 

filing posthearing briefs is October 2, 

2007; witness testimony must be filed 

no later than three days before the 

hearing. In addition, any person who 

has not entered an appearance as a party 

to the reviews may submit a written 

statement of information pertinent to 

the subject of the reviews on or before 

October 2, 2007. On November 6, 2007, 

the Commission will make available to 

parties all information on which they 

have not had an opportunity to 

comment. Parties may submit final 

comments on this information on or 

before November 8, 2007, but such final 

comments must not contain new factual 

information and must otherwise comply 

with section 207.68 of the Commission’s 

rules. All written submissions must 

conform with the provisions of section 

201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any 

submissions that contain BPI must also 

conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

rules do not authorize filing of 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means, except to 

the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 

FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even 

where electronic filing of a document is 

permitted, certain documents must also 

be filed in paper form, as specified in II 

(C) of the Commission’s Handbook on 

Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 

68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). 

Additional written submissions to the 

Commission, including requests 

pursuant to section 201.12 of the 

Commission’s rules, shall not be 

accepted unless good cause is shown for 

accepting such submissions, or unless 

the submission is pursuant to a specific 

request by a Commissioner or 

Commission staff. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

reviews must be served on all other 

parties to the reviews (as identified by 

either the public or BPI service list), and 

a certificate of service must be timely 

filed. The Secretary will not accept a 

document for filing without a certificate 

of service. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 12, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–672 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–553] 

In the Matter of Certain NAND Flash 

Memory Devices and Products 

Containing Same; Notice of 

Commission Determination To Review 

a Final Determination of no Violation of 

Section 337; Schedule for Filing 

Written Submissions on Remedy, 

Public Interest, and Bonding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to review 

the final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

issued by the presiding administrative 

law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on November 20, 

2006, regarding whether there is a 

violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the abovecaptioned investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5468. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on November 25, 2005, based on a 

complaint filed by Hynix 

Semiconductor Inc. of Korea; Hynix 

Semiconductor America Inc. of San 

Jose, California; and Hynix 

Semiconductor Manufacturing America 

Inc. of Eugene, Oregon (collectively, 

‘‘Hynix’’). The complaint, as 

supplemented and amended, alleged 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain NAND flash memory devices 

and products containing the same by 

reason of infringement of various claims 

of United States Patent Nos. 5,509,995 

and 5,869,404. 

On November 20, 2006, the presiding 

ALJ issued his final ID, finding no 

violation of section 337 by respondents 

Toshiba Corporation of Japan; Toshiba 

America Electronic Components, Inc. of 

Irvine, California; Toshiba America 

Information Systems, Inc. of Irvine, 

California; and Toshiba America 

Consumer Products, L.L.C. of Wayne, 

New Jersey (collectively, ‘‘Toshiba’’). On 

December 4, 2006, the ALJ issued his 

recommended determination on remedy 

and bonding. 

On December 6, 2006, Hynix filed a 

petition for review, challenging the 

ALJ’s ID. On the same day, Toshiba filed 

a conditional petition for review of the 

ALJ’s ID. On December 14, 2006, 

Toshiba and the Commission 

investigative attorney each filed 

responses to Hynix’s petition for review, 

and Hynix filed a response to Toshiba’s 

conditional petition for review. 

Having examined the record of this 

investigation, including the ALJ’s final 

ID and the submissions of the parties, 

the Commission has determined to 

review the final ID in its entirety. 

In connection with the final 

disposition of this investigation, the 

Commission may (1) issue an order that 

could result in the exclusion of the 

subject articles from entry into the 

United States, and/or (2) issue one or 

more cease and desist orders that could 

result in the respondent being required 

to cease and desist from engaging in 

unfair acts in the importation and sale 

of such articles. Accordingly, the 

Commission is interested in receiving 

written submissions that address the 

form of remedy, if any, that should be 

ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an 

article from entry into the United States 

for purposes other than entry for 

consumption, the party should so 

indicate and provide information 

establishing that activities involving 

other types of entry either are adversely 

affecting it or likely to do so. For 

background, see In the Matter of Certain 

Devices for Connecting Computers via 

Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, 

USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994) 

(Commission Opinion). 

If the Commission contemplates some 

form of remedy, it must consider the 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES