alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008005EN.01000201.xml

| 10.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 January 2008

(2008/C 5/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,468 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 160,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4481 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,74865 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,403 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6362 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,4 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,891 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,98 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,34 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6974 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,593 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6525 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,328 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7066 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,661 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4739 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4587 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8981 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1016 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 376,1 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0535 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6606 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,35 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 857,19 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,793 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,546 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,919 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,42 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5897 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0416 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,468

JPY

Japanese yen

160,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4481

GBP

Pound sterling

0,74865

SEK

Swedish krona

9,403

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6362

ISK

Iceland króna

92,4

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,891

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,98

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,34

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6974

PLN

Polish zloty

3,593

RON

Romanian leu

3,6525

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,328

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7066

AUD

Australian dollar

1,661

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4739

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4587

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8981

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1016

KRW

South Korean won

1 376,1

ZAR

South African rand

10,0535

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6606

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,35

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 857,19

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,793

PHP

Philippine peso

59,546

RUB

Russian rouble

35,919

THB

Thai baht

43,42

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5897

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0416

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
CAUSE NO. 12-15-00071-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

HAROLD LLOYD BASS, JR.

, } APPEALED FROM 114TH DISTRICT COURT

APPELLANT

V. } IN AND FOR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, } SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE



### ORDER

Came on for consideration the Appellant’s Pro Se Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in

the above-referenced cause, and it appearing that Appellant’s counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and

that Appellant has been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief, it is hereby

ORDERED that the trial court ensure that Appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate

record on or before January 4, 2016

, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court

in writing as to the date or dates upon which the appellate record was made available to Appellant and the

amount of time for which Appellant had access to the record on each date. Appellant shall have thirty

(30) days from the day the appellate record was first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this

Court.

WITNESS THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN

, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals

District, Tyler, Texas.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE at Tyler, Texas, this 2nd day of

December 2015

, A.D.

Respectfully yours,

PAM ESTES

, CLERK

By:

_______________________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 15, 2023

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23

- 1253

Lower Tribunal No. F07

- 1257

________________



### Willie Mar i on Davis

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces

, Judge.

Willie Mar i on Davis , in proper person.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, GORDO and LOBREE , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Matter of dissolution Brunswick Manufacturing Company.

Order modified by striking out the word *“*directed ” and by requiring undertaking of $1,000 to secure costs.
#### James Wallace, *Appellant, v.*John F. Wallace and another, *as Executors, etc.,*and others, *Respondents.*

—- Decree reversed ; trial directed at Circuit. Opinion by Daniels, J.
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.25









BIOCRYST
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

2425 KILDAIRE FARM ROAD, SUITE 106

CARY, NC 27518
 919-859-7908 919-859-1314 FAX




2190 PARKWAY LAKE DRIVE

BIRMINGHAM, AL 35244

205-444-4648 205-444-4640 FAX




www.biocryst.com




May 21, 2008




Mr. Stuart Grant

240 Summer St.

Norwell, MA 02061




Dear Stuart,



I would like to present you with this retention bonus program in recognition of the outstanding and
valuable contributions you have made to BioCryst Pharmaceuticals and will continue to make in the
future. The Compensation Committee has reviewed this program and has approved offering it to you.
The retention bonus will be extended and paid to you as long as you remain an active employee with
the company through December 31, 2009.




You will be provided with the following retention bonus;





	 	•	 	80% of your 4/1/08 annual base salary, plus;
	 
	 	•	 	The equivalent of 20% of your 4/1/08 annual base salary in Restricted Stock
Awards (24,839 shares of common stock).




As a section 16 Officer, extending this retention bonus to you will be viewed as material and will
require an 8-k disclosure. In the event of a Change of Control, prior to December 31, 2009, you
will be eligible to receive the benefits as noted above.



Our future success as a company is directly related to your important contributions and ongoing
leadership. Once again, thank you for your continued support and help in making BioCryst a
financial success.




Sincerely,




	 	 	 
	/s/ Jon Stonehouse
 

Jon Stonehouse

	 	 
	CEO and President
	 	 
	BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
No. 64269.

protest 316786-K (Pembina).

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
exv10w3









Exhibit 10.3




DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

60 WALL STREET

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10005




May 14, 2008




Wellman, Inc.

1041 521 Corporate Center Drive

Fort Mill, South Carolina 29715

Attention: Chief Financial Officer

and Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer




Re: Wellman, Inc. Credit Agreement dated as of February 27, 2008




     Reference is hereby made to that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2008, by
and among Wellman, Inc. (the “Funds Administrator”) and the other Borrowers party thereto,
as debtors and debtors in possession, as Borrowers, the Lenders from time to time party thereto,
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Administrative Agent (in such capacity, the
“Administrative Agent”) and Collateral Agent, and the other agents signatory thereto (as
amended, restated, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit
Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings assigned to such terms in the Credit Agreement.



     The undersigned Administrative Agent, on behalf of the Majority Lenders, hereby consents to
the Funds Administrator’s request that Section 9.1(i)(xvi) of the Credit Agreement be modified by
replacing the text “on or before May 29, 2008” therein with the text “on or before June 5, 2008”.
Except as expressly amended hereby, the Credit Agreement continues in full force and effect and the
amendment set forth above shall be limited precisely as written.



[signature page follows]




 









 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY	 	 
	 	 	AMERICAS, as Administrative Agent	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Marguerite Sutton
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Enrique Landaeta	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Vice President	 	 






Acknowledged and agreed as of

This 15 day of May, 2008




	 	 	 	 	 
	WELLMAN, INC.

	 
	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Keith Phillips
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Chief Financial Officer	 	 






Signature Page to Consent
Exhibit 99.8



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of
Extorre Gold Mines Limited (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darcy Daubaras, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)         The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|April 2, 2012 | /s/ Darcy Daubaras                          
|------------- | --------------------------------------------
|              | Darcy Daubaras                              
|              | Chief Financial Officer                     
|              | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-21063

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUKE CHRISTOPHER YANEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CR-221-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 21, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luke Christopher Yanez appeals from his sentence following

conviction for two counts of aiding and abetting to commit mail

fraud, three counts of mail fraud in connection with a

telemarketing operation, and two counts of wire fraud in

connection with a telemarketing operation. Yanez first argues

that the district court clearly erred in applying a two-level

vulnerable-victim adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3A1.1(b). A

finding of unusual vulnerability is reviewed for clear error, “to

determine whether the district court’s conclusion was plausible 
No. 96-21063

-2-

in light of the record as a whole.” United States v. Robinson,

119 F.3d 1205, 1218 (5th Cir. 1997)(internal quotation and

citation omitted), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1104 (1998). Yanez

admitted that he had purchased the names and telephone numbers of

his victims as a list of individuals who were believed to have

previously participated in other telemarketing schemes. There

was evidence that this list also included personal notes

affirming the victims’ susceptibility to fraudulent schemes. The

district court did not commit clear error by increasing Yanez’s

sentence pursuant to § 3A1.1(b).

Yanez also contends that the district court erred in

upwardly departing from the Sentencing Guidelines when

determining his sentence. This court generally reviews a

district court’s decision to depart from the Sentencing

Guidelines for abuse of discretion. See United States v.

Ravitch, 128 F.3d 865, 869 (5th Cir. 1997). However, because

Yanez failed to object to this upward departure in the district

court, consideration of this issue is limited to plain error

review. See id. The district court based the six-level upward

departure equally on three factors: (1) the large number of

victims (over 1,000 individuals); (2) the fact that many of the

victims were elderly; and (3) Yanez’s avoidance of moneylaundering charges by virtue of his plea agreement. There was no

error, plain or otherwise.

Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the district court is

AFFIRMED.
**授权委托书**

**Power of Attorney**

 

顾松拥有鞍山壹好科技发展有限公司(“公司”)10%的股权(“本人股权”)的股东,就本人股权,特此不可撤销地授权锦沃(上海)信息科技有限公司(“WFOE”)在本授权委托书的有效期内行使如下权利:

Gu Song is a holder of 10% of the entireregistered capital in Anshan Easy Health Technology Development Co., Ltd. (the " Company ") ("My Shareholding"),hereby irrevocably authorizeJinwo (Shanghai) Information Technology Co., Ltd. ("WFOE")to exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during the term of this Power of Attorney:

 

授权WFOE作为本人唯一的排他的代理人就有关本人股权的事宜全权代表本人行使包括但不限于如下的权利:1)参加公司的股东会;2)行使按照法律和公司章程规定本人所享有的全部股东权和股东表决权,包括但不限于出售或转让或质押或处置本人股权的全部或任何一部分;以及3)作为本人的授权代表指定和任命公司的法定代表人(董事长)、董事、监事、总经理以及其他高级管理人员等。

WFOE is hereby authorized to act on behalfof myself as my exclusive agent and attorney with respect to all matters concerning My Shareholding, including without limitationto: 1) attend shareholders' meetings of the Company; 2) exercise all the shareholder's rights and shareholder's voting rights Iam entitled to under the laws of China and the Company’s Articles of Association, including but not limited to the sale ortransfer or pledge or disposition of My Shareholding in part or in whole; and 3) designate and appoint on behalf of myself thelegal representative (chairperson), the director, supervisor, the chief executive officer and other senior management members ofthe Company.

 

 

WFOE将有权在授权范围内代表本人签署独家购买权合同(本人应要求作为合同方)中约定的转让合同,如期履行本人作为合同一方的与本授权委托书同日签署的股权质押合同和独家购买权合同,该权利的行使将不对本授权形成任何限制。

Without limiting the generality of thepowers granted hereunder, WFOE shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to execute the Transfer Contractsstipulated in Exclusive Option Agreement, to which I am required to be a party, on behalf of myself, and to effect the terms ofthe Share Pledge Agreement and Exclusive Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to which I am a party.

 

WFOE就本人股权的一切行为均视为本人的行为,签署的一切文件均视为本人签署,本人会予以承认。

All the actions associated withMy Shareholding conducted by WFOE shall be deemed as my own actions, and all the documents related to My Shareholding executedby WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by me. I hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by WFOE.

 

WFOE有转委托权,可以就上述事项的办理自行再委托其他人或单位而不必事先通知本人或获得本人的同意。

WFOE is entitled to re-authorize or assignits rights related to the aforesaid matters to any other person or entity at its own discretion and without giving prior noticeto me or obtaining my consent.

 

在本人为公司的股东期间,本授权委托书不可撤销并持续有效,自授权委托书签署之日起算。

This Power of Attorney is coupled withan interest and shall be irrevocable and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney, so long as Iam a shareholder of the Company.

 

本授权委托书期间,本人特此放弃已经通过本授权委托书授权给WFOE的与本人股权有关的所有权利,不再自行行使该等权利。

During the term of thisPower of Attorney, I hereby waive all the rights associated with My Shareholding, which have been authorized to WFOE through thisPower of Attorney, and shall not exercise such rights by myself.

 

 

本授权委托书以中文和英文书就,中英文版本如有冲突,应以中文版为准。

This Power of Attorneyis written in Chinese and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chineseversion shall prevail.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN BELCHER, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. No. 11-17322 D.C. No. 1:09-cv-01234-DLB
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dennis L. Beck, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Submitted May 10, 2013 **

San Francisco, California Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. John Belcher, a successful Social Secur ity benefits claimant, appeals the district court’s reduction and denial of hi s requests for supplemental attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (E AJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). We review a 

# FILED
JUN 12 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 district court’s denial of attorneys’ f ees under the EAJA for abuse of discretion. See Lewis v. Barnhart , 281 F.3d 1081, 1083 (9th Cir. 2002). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part and reverse in part. In its denial or reduction of attorneys’ fees, the district court must offer a clear and concise explanation, but the expl anation does not need to be elaborate. Moreno v. City of Sacramento , 534 F.3d 1106, 1111 (9th Cir. 2008). A district court has “substantial discretion in fi xing the amount of an EAJA award.” Comm’r, INS v. Jean , 496 U.S. 154, 163 (1990). Here, the magistrate judge adequately explained his reasoning for rejecting fees incurred to correct a clerical erro r made by the court, and for reducing fees incurred attempting to settle the supplemental fee application. Hensley v. Eckerhart , 461 U.S. 424, 437 (1983) (district court has significant discretion due to its “superior understanding of the litiga tion and the desirability of avoiding frequent appellate review of what essentially are factua l matters”). The magistrate judge also did not abuse his discreti on by denying Belcher’s second supplemental application for EAJA fees. Jean , 496 U.S. at 163 (district court can recognize and discount improper positions that unreasonably protract proceedings). But the magistrate judge did abuse his discretion by reducing the award of fees for time spent preparing the reply brief from eight hours to two hours. The3 district court’s explanation that the issu es briefed were “routine” was insufficient given the magnitude of the reduction. See Costa v. Comm’r of Social Sec. Admin. , 690 F.3d 1132, 1136–37 (9th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (magistrate judge’s explanation that issues briefed inopening memorandum were not “novel or complex” was insufficient to justify fifty percent reduction). Four hours is a reasonable amount of time for the preparation of the subject reply brief. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
Before the Second Division,

March 29, 1944

No. 49295.

#### Protest 950392-G of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

•Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted evidence disclosed that the curling irons in question are similar to those involved in Abstract 38680, the record in which was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
No. 54197.

#### Sprague Steamship Company *v.*United States,

protest 148808-K (Norfolk).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 31 Filed: 01/04/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T10:57:25-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 918 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the interment of military 

working dogs in any open national cemetery under the control of the 

National Cemetery Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. VICENTE GONZALEZ of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

interment of military working dogs in any open national 

cemetery under the control of the National Cemetery 

Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sgt. Fieldy Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 918 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERMENT OF MILITARY WORKING DOGS IN NA2 TIONAL CEMETERIES. 

3 (a) INTERMENT OF MILITARY WORKING DOGS.— 

4 Section 2402 of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

5 by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(c)(1) In addition to the persons specified in sub7 section (a), under such regulations as the Secretary may 

8 prescribe, the remains of any covered dog may be interred 

9 in any open national cemetery under the control of the 

10 National Cemetery Administration. 

11 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘covered dog’ means 

12 a deceased dog that, at any time before death, was a mili13 tary working dog, as described in section 2583(i) of title 

14 10.’’. 

15 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub16 section (a) shall apply with respect to deaths occurring 

17 on or after the day that is one year before the date of 

18 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS