alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, John J. Zimmer, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Transcat, Inc., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Transcat, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: November 9, 2007 /s/ John J. Zimmer         John J. Zimmer    Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Train Horn Rule - History and Timeline

Historically, railroads have sounded horns in advance of grade crossings to warn of oncoming 

trains. Nearly every state enacted laws requiring that horns be sounded. Some states, however, 

permitted exceptions in local communities, allowing them to create whistle bans (i.e. local laws 

which prohibit the use of train horns or whistles at crossings).

In the late 1980’s, FRA observed a significant increase in nighttime train-vehicle collisions at 

certain gated highway-rail grade crossings on the Florida East Coast Railway (FEC) at which 

nighttime whistle bans had been established in accordance with State statute. Florida’s law 

permitted the establishment of whistle bans during the hours of 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. at crossings that 

were located on railroads that operated only within the state of Florida that were equipped with 

flashing lights and gates. The study compared the number of collisions before and after the 

implementation of the Florida Whistle Ban. The results identified a 195% increase in trainvehicle collisions during the ban hours at hornless gated grade crossings. There was not a 

similar increase in collisions during the time period that horns were sounded. After considering 

many possible factors that could have contributed in the increase in the number of collisions, 

FRA concluded that the whistle ban was the primary factor contributing to the increase in grade 

crossing collisions and subsequently issued Emergency Order 15, which overturned Florida’s 

ban and required trains to resume sounding their horns. The rate of nighttime collisions at the 

whistle ban crossings returned to the level that existed prior to the establishment of the whistle 

bans. [i]

The study of Florida’s whistle bans raised concerns about the impact of whistle bans on crossing 

collisions nationwide. A national study concluded that the lack of a train horn increased the risk 

of a collision by 66.8% at crossings that were equipped with flashing lights and gates. [ii] These 

studies prompted Congress to take further action by directing FRA to issue a federal regulation 

requiring trains to sound locomotive horns at all public highway-rail grade crossings. It also 

gave FRA the ability to determine exceptions to that requirement by allowing communities to 

establish quiet zones to mitigate the use of horns without compromising safety. 

“The Final Rule on the Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings,[iii] effective 

June 24, 2005, established national regulations prescribing how and when train horns must be 

sounded when approaching public highway-rail grade crossings. This rule also established a 

process by which public authorities would be able to establish quiet zones.

[i] Florida Whistle Ban Study, 

http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/FromOldSite/pdforphan/floridaban.pdf

[ii] Analysis Of The Safety Impact Of Train Horn Bans At Highway-Rail Grade Crossings: An 

Update Using 1997-2001 Data; 

http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/Safety/train_horn_rule/national_report_f9-15.pdf.
#### Netherlands Purchasing Commission *v.*United States

No. 7351.

Invoices dated Manchester, England, January 26, 1942, etc.

Entered at New Orleans, La., March 22, 1943, etc.

Entry No. 904, etc.

(Decided July 24, 1947)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT MANUEL A. AYALA, JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-1529 September 14, 2022 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Catherine L. Combee, Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
# C_2007183EN.01002201.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/22

---

Action brought on 31 May 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-257/07)

(2007/C 183/37)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicants: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Kukovec and K. Nyberg, acting as Agents)

Applicants:

Defendants: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendants:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/17/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (the procurement directive) or in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/17/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (the procurement directive) or in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | Order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for implementation of the Directive expired on 31 January 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2
------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TSR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Sharkey, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

The forgoing certification is incorporated solely for the purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.

/s/ John G. Sharkey
------------------------------
Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
January 7, 2008
# C_2007315EN.01002901.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/29

---

Action brought on 24 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-470/07)

(2007/C 315/48)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G Zabbos and N Yerrell, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that the Hellenic Republic, by not adopting the laws regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/54/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the Trans-European Road Network, and in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Hellenic Republic, by not adopting the laws regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/54/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the Trans-European Road Network, and in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for the transposition of the directive into national law expired on 30 April 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 167 of 30.4.2004, p. 39.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Gladstone Land Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (Form 10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: March 27, 2013  
|                       
|/s/ David Gladstone    
|David Gladstone        
|Chief Executive Officer
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# America the beautiful: Illinois

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  America the beautiful: Illinois 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Parallel-terraced alfalfa field, Ogle County soil and water conservation district 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Agriculture 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1960-1970 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  Illinois 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  150 × 60 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  A57.8-2.Il6.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9295 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9295

To direct the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense to 
   provide a briefing to Congress on security options for the Joint 
      Warfighter Cloud Capability program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2024

 Ms. Slotkin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense to 
   provide a briefing to Congress on security options for the Joint 
      Warfighter Cloud Capability program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRIEFING ON SECURITY OPTIONS FOR THE JOINT WARFIGHTER CLOUD 
              CAPABILITY.

    Not later than February 1, 2025, the Chief Information Officer of 
the Department of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed 
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on 
cloud-specific security applications that may be incorporated into the 
Joint Warfighter Cloud Capability program.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 3, 2017

s0131

Order 

Clerk

February 3, 2017

154776

VANESSA OZIMEK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 154776

COA: 331726

Wayne CC: 13-109046-DC

LEE J. RODGERS,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing whether the Wayne Circuit Court’s February 8, 2016 order denying the 

plaintiff mother’s motion to change the school district that her child attends was “a 

postjudgment order affecting the custody of a minor” and therefore a “final order” under 

MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iii). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their 

application papers. We further direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case 

for the same future session of the Court when it will hear oral argument in Marik v Marik

(Docket No. 154549).
No. 54202.

#### Vitamin Oil Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 150420-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.01





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED UNDER RULE 13(a)-14(a) AND 15(d)-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED








I, Nicholas Woodman, certify that:


1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of GoPro, Inc.;


2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;








Date:May 25, 2017/s/ Nicholas WoodmanNicholas WoodmanChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2008014EN.01002201.xml

| 19.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/22

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 January 2008

(2008/C 14/08)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4674 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,70 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4539 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,74810 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4283 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6144 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 95,41 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9915 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,118 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 256,13 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6988 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,6165 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6749 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,693 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7341 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6697 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5024 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4550 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9127 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1050 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 383,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2954 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6266 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3367 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 863,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7999 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,723 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,9230 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,450 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6026 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0269 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4674

JPY

Japanese yen

157,70

DKK

Danish krone

7,4539

GBP

Pound sterling

0,74810

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4283

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6144

ISK

Iceland króna

95,41

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9915

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,118

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

256,13

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6988

PLN

Polish zloty

3,6165

RON

Romanian leu

3,6749

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,693

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7341

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6697

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5024

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4550

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9127

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1050

KRW

South Korean won

1 383,90

ZAR

South African rand

10,2954

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6266

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3367

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 863,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7999

PHP

Philippine peso

59,723

RUB

Russian rouble

35,9230

THB

Thai baht

45,450

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6026

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0269

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---