alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| Date: September 27, 2011 |   |                                                                             |
|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |                                                                             |
|                     |   | /s/Daniel R. Herndon                                                             |
|                     |   | Name:     Daniel R. Herndon                                  |
|                     |   | Title:       President and Chief Executive Officer |

| Date: September 27, 2011 |   |                                                          |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |                                                          |
|                     |   | /s/Clyde D. Patterson                                         |
|                     |   | Name:    Clyde D. Patterson                    |
|                     |   | Title:      Executive Vice President |
|                     |   |   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)           |
**Exhibit 4.27**

**** 

**Summary of the Private Instrument of Real Properties and Rural Assets Purchase and Sale Commitment and Other Covenants, entered into  on May 22, 2017, in connection with Fazenda Araucária**

**Parties**: Imobiliária Araucária Ltda., as Seller, Procópio & Oliveira Ltda. – ME, as Buyer, Marcio Antonio de Oliveira, as Guarantor; and Brasilagro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedade Agrícolas, as Intervening-consenting party.

**Purpose**:  The commitment to sell a total area of 1,360 hectares comprised of 918.25 hectares of arable land of Fazenda Araucaria, for the price, in Brazilian Reais, corresponding to 257,110 bags of soybeans, to be paid as follows: 35% of the total price in the first year and five subsequent yearly installments in the amount corresponding to 33,376 bags of soybeans each installment the first expiring on April 28, 2018 and the last on April 24, 2022. The physical possession over the area of 1,208.75 hectares was granted to the Buyer on September 30, 2017, after proper payment of 35% of the purchase price, and the physical possession of the remaining 151.25 hectares shall be delivered on September 30, 2018, it being understood that the actual transfer of the title to and ownership of the area shall only take place after full payment of the purchase price.
##### 



Exhibit 31.4
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United America Indemnity, Ltd.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this Quarterly Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this Quarterly Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this Quarterly Report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Richard
S. MarchRichard
S. MarchGeneral
Counsel
EXHIBIT 8.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF GLOBUS MARITIME LIMITED



|Name                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Name Under Which theSubsidiaries do Business
|--------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Globus Shipmanagement Corp. |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Globus Shipmanagement Corp.                 
|Elysium Maritime Limited    |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Elysium Maritime Limited                    
|Devocean Maritime Ltd.      |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Devocean Maritime Ltd.                      
|Domina Maritime Ltd.        |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Domina Maritime Ltd.                        
|Dulac Maritime S.A.         |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Dulac Maritime S.A.                         
|Kelty Marine Ltd.           |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Kelty Marine Ltd.                           
|Supreme Navigation Co.      |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Supreme Navigation Co.                      
|Rosario Maritime Inc.       |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Rosario Maritime Inc.                       
|Artful Shipholding S.A.     |  | Marshall Islands              |  | Artful Shipholding S.A.                     
|Longevity Maritime Limited  |  | Malta                         |  | Longevity Maritime Limited
February 5, 1943

No. 47998.

#### Protests 4516-K, etc., of J. S. Staedtler, Inc.

C. D. 640. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
# C_2007199EN.01004702.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 5 July 2007 — Bertolete and Others v Commission

(Case F-26/06) (1)

1

(Officials - Contract staff - Classification and remuneration - Office for Infrastructure and Logistics Brussels (OIB) - Nursery school teachers - Former paid employees under Belgian law - Change of applicable regime - Equal treatment)

(2007/C 199/91)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Marli Bertolete (Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium) and Others (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and L. Lozano Palacios, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission decision rejecting the complaints that the applicants had lodged concerning the decisions introduced against the decisions fixing their classification and payment as contract staff

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decisions by which the Commission of the European Communities fixed the applicants' remuneration on the basis of contract staff contracts signed in April 2005; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decisions by which the Commission of the European Communities fixed the applicants' remuneration on the basis of contract staff contracts signed in April 2005;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and to pay half of the applicants' costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and to pay half of the applicants' costs;

| 4. | Orders the applicants to bear half of their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the applicants to bear half of their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006, p. 34.

1

---
No. 46272.

#### Protest 2365-K of Quon Quon Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the vases in question are chiefly used in the kitchen or household or on the table for utilitarian, purposes they were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. ■ Abstracts 29991, 35047, and 45722 followed.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Terrance Norvell , Jr. , Appellant

No. 06

- 21

- 00051

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 51694

- A ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss

, Justice Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that th e appellant, Terrance Norvell , Jr. , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 13, 2022 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
# C_2008033EN.01000102.xml

| 7.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4892 — Infineon/Siemens/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 33/02)

On 29 November 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4892. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4892. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 599-1170, the US Postal Service information hotline

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 599-1170, the US Postal Service information hotline 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Postal Service 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  192 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  022398933.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
SERVED: AUGUST 12, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC IN THE MATTER OF JOHN ALAN DAVIS DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0409 (Civil Penalty ACtion)
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013GL-13-0038) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, andthe other persons onthe attached Service List.

# -----

Attachnient
- Service List . (.SERVICE LIST- BY

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

### John Alan Davis, 

### Respondent 12052 116th St. Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 · Kate Barber, 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration, AGL-7 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 TEL: 847-294-7862 FAX: 847-294-7498 ONE COPY



### Hon. J.E. Sullivan,

### Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation. 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0409 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

JOSEPH DANIEL PIRESTANI, 

Cross-Petitioner Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

KEVIN J. REAGAN, 

Petitioner Below, 

Appellee, 

and 

ATTORNEY AD LITEM, 

Appellee. 

 

§ 

§ 

§ No. 299, 2018 

§ 

§ Court Below—Court of Chancery 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ C.M. No. 17950-N 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Submitted: June 7, 2018 

 Decided: June 11, 2018 

Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

O R D E R

 

 This 11th day of June 2018, having considered the notice of appeal from an 

interlocutory order under Supreme Court Rule 42, it appears to the Court that: 

(1) On June 7, 2018, the appellant, Joseph Daniel Pirestani, filed a notice 

of interlocutory appeal from a Court of Chancery order, dated January 31, 2018, 

denying his motions for admission of additional evidence, and a Court of Chancery 

order, dated May 8, 2018, denying his motion for reargument of the January 31, 2018 

order. Pirestani filed an application for certification of an interlocutory appeal on 
2

May 18, 2018. The Court of Chancery denied the application for certification on 

May 23, 2018. 

(2) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 

discretion of the Court1

 and are granted only in exceptional circumstances.2 In the 

exercise of our discretion, we have concluded that the application for interlocutory 

review does not meet the strict standards for certification under Supreme Court Rule 

42(b) and should be refused. 

(3) This is the third interlocutory appeal Pirestani has filed in three months 

relating to the guardianship proceeding in the Court of Chancery, C.M. No. 17950-

N. None of the appeals met the standards for certification under Rule 42. The Court 

will not take any action on Pirestani’s future notices of appeal or petitions relating 

to C.M. No. 17950-N until he pays the filing fee or files a motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis in those future matters. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory 

appeal is REFUSED and that no action will be taken on Pirestani’s future notices of 

 

1

 Supr. Ct. R. 42(d)(v). 

2

 Supr. Ct. R. 42(b)(ii). 
3

appeal or petitions relating to C.M. No. 17950-N until he pays the filing fee or files 

a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in those future matters. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of

Texas Gas Transmission, LLC

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief executive officer of Texas Gas Transmission, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ H. Dean Jones II



H. Dean Jones II

President

(Chief Executive Officer)

Texas Gas Transmission, LLC

July 29, 2005
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v EARL F. FAULKNER, Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

7 USCMA 304, 22 CMR 94

No. 8076

Decided August 24, 1956

*First Lieutenant James L. Gault*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief was *Lieutenant Colonel James M. Scott.*

*First Lieutenant Peter J. Hughes*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel Thomas J. Newton, Captain Vernon M. Culpepper,*and *First Lieutenant William K. Davenport.*

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused was convicted by a general court-martial of desertion based upon an absence of thirty-five days. The issue in his case is the same as that presented in United States v Hawthorne, 7 USCMA 293, 22 CMR 83. For the reasons set out in our opinion in that case, we set aside the finding of guilty and the sentence here, and return the case to The Judge Advocate General of the Army. He will transmit the record of trial to the officer exercising summary court-martial jurisdiction over the accused for consideration and action.

Judge FERGUSON concurs.

LatimeR, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result.

The commanding officer of the accused, who was also the accuser, did

not specifically mention the policy directive, merely noting that the accused had two previous convictions as the reason for recommending trial by general court-martial. However, under the concepts I rely on in United States v Hawthorne, 7 USCMA 293, 22 CMR 83, that fact would make little difference in result. As in that case, it is reasonable to assume here that the court-martial members were apprised of the provisions of the letter, and that those provisions would have an impact on their findings and sentence. Under those conditions, a reversal is in order, for an accused is entitled to have his guilt and sentence determined by a court uninfluenced by instructions from higher headquarters.

In this instance, I do not impose a waiver on the defense for the following reasons. The accused was charged and convicted of desertion based on an absence of approximately thirty-five days. *305He was apprehended some 800 miles from his place of duty, but other factors militate against an inference of intent to remain away permanently. He testified to his reasons for the absence and specifically asserted his intent to return. Therefore, a finding of the lesser included offense of absence without leave by a court-martial unshackled of command influence was a distinct possibility. Certainly from the record it is reasonable to assume that any expression of the Army Commander that all members of the class to which the accused belonged should be separated from the service would influence the court-martial members in their deliberations. Such being the case, the right to a fair trial has been abridged, and a miscarriage of justice might result from an affirmance. Therefore, I join in the action ordered by the Court.