alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                         6,274,454
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,570,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    447,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,792,422
<PP&E>                                         526,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,161,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,722,626
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       74,695
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,283,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,161,755
<SALES>                                        34,281,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               34,281,057
<CGS>                                          27,887,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  33,200,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,320,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                   432,579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   888,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.17
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 34.1





ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH


SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Shareholders


Entergy Arkansas, Inc.


Little Rock, Arkansas





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria For Asset-Backed Securities, that Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB applicable to Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC’s Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds (the “Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, excluding criteria in Items 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 for Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC’s Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





New Orleans, Louisiana


March 22, 2018
# CA2007258EN.01001901.xml

| 31.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 258/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 258/19

---

CORRIGENDUM TO NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/98/07 TO CONSTITUTE A RESERVE OF SENIOR AUDIT OFFICERS (AD9) OF BULGARIAN, CZECH, ESTONIAN, LITHUANIAN, MALTESE, ROMANIAN, SLOVENIAN AND SLOVAKIAN CITIZENSHIP.

CORRIGENDUM TO NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/98/07 TO CONSTITUTE A RESERVE OF SENIOR AUDIT OFFICERS (AD9) OF BULGARIAN, CZECH, ESTONIAN, LITHUANIAN, MALTESE, ROMANIAN, SLOVENIAN AND SLOVAKIAN CITIZENSHIP.

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 171 A of 24 July 2007
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 171 A of 24 July 2007

(2007/C 258 A/05)

On page 3:

for:

for:

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following admission tests and open competition, based on tests, to constitute a reserve pool from which to recruit

SENIOR AUDIT OFFICERS (*) (AD9)

of Bulgarian, Czech, Estonian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Romanian, Slovenian and Slovakian citizenship.

read:

read:

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition, based on qualifications and an oral test, to constitute a reserve pool from which to recruit

SENIOR AUDIT OFFICERS (*) (AD9)

of Bulgarian, Czech, Estonian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Romanian, Slovenian and Slovakian citizenship.

---
Exhibit 10.c




                        Independent Accountants' Consent

The Contract Owners
Kansas City Life Variable Annuity Separate Account
   and
The Board of Directors
Kansas City Life Insurance Company:


We consent to the reference to our firm under the heading  "Experts," and to the
use of our report  dated  January 17,  2001,  with  respect to the  consolidated
financial statements of Kansas City Life Insurance Company and to the use of our
report dated April 6, 2001,  with respect to the financial  statements of Kansas
City Life  Variable  Annuity  Separate  Account  included  in the  Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the  Registration  Statement under the Securities Act of 1933
(File No.  333-52290)  on Form N-4 and  Post-Effective  Amendment  No. 9 and the
Registration  Statement under the Investment  Company Act of 1940  (Registration
No. 811-8994) and the related Statement of Additional  Information  accompanying
the Prospectus of Affinity Variable Annuity Separate Account.


                                   /s/KPMG LLP
                                   KPMG LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
April 26, 2001
October 19, 1944

No. 49770.

Suit 4439.

#### Pacific *Vegetable Oil Co.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 725 affirmed April 27, 1944 (32 C. C. P. A. 68, C. A. D. 287).
FORM 10-Q

                                                                 Exhibit 12



                           TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY

                     RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



     The  following  table  sets  forth  the company's ratio of earnings to

fixed charges for the periods indicated.


  Six Months    Twelve Months                                 (1)
     Ended          Ended              Year Ended December 31,
June 30, 1997   June 30, 1997      1996   1995  1994(2) 1993(3) 1992

    4.33x           4.59x         4.40x  4.28x  3.88x   3.81x   3.92x


     For the purposes of calculating this ratio, earnings consist of income

before  income  taxes and fixed charges.  Fixed charges consist of interest

on  indebtedness,  amortization  of debt premium, the interest component of

rentals and preferred stock dividend requirements.

                                                                           
(1)
      Prior  year  amounts  have  been  restated  to  reflect the mergers of
     Peoples Gas System, Inc. and West Florida Natural Gas Company with and
     into Tampa Electric Company.
(2)
      Includes  the  effect  of a $21.3-million pretax restructuring charge.
     The effect of this charge was to reduce the ratio of earnings to fixed
     charges.    Had  this  non-recurring  charge  been  excluded  from the
     calculation,  the  ratio  of earnings to fixed charges would have been
     4.23x for the period ended Dec. 31, 1994.
(3)
      Includes  the  effect  of  the non-recurring $10-million pretax charge
     associated  with  a coal pricing settlement. The effect of this charge
     was  to  reduce the ratio of earnings to fixed charges.  Had this non-
     recurring  charge  been  excluded  from  the calculation, the ratio of
     earnings  to  fixed  charges  would have been 3.97x for the year ended
     Dec. 31, 1993.






                                   - 32 -<PAGE>
#### W. R. Keating & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7356.

Invoices dated Brentford, England, November 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 18, 1942, etc.

Entry No. 714696, etc.

(Decided August 14, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
|          
|----------
|Exhibit 32
|          











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report of Blue Spa Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2014 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Law Yau Yau, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/
    Law Yau Yau         | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Law
    Yau Yau             | 
|Chief
    Executive Officer | 
|September
    12, 2014      | 











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report of Blue Spa Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2014 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Law Yau Yau, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/
    Law Yau Yau         | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Law
    Yau Yau             | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer | 
|September
    12, 2014      |
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa A. Herbert, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:   (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Teresa A. Herbert
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
May 10, 2007   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   1
# C_2007297EN.01003506.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/35

---

Order of the President of the Court of 20 July 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-217/07) (1)

1

(2007/C 297/72)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 7.7.2007.

1

---
# C_2007211EN.01004901.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/49

---

Action brought on 17 July 2007 — Sungro v Council and Commission

(Case T-252/07)

(2007/C 211/90)

Language of the proceedings: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Sungro, S.A. (Córdoba, Spain) (represented by: L. Ortiz Blanco, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities

Defendants:

Forms of order sought

| — | to uphold the present action for damages, in accordance with Article 288 EC, and declare the applicant is entitled to be financially compensated by the Council and the Commission jointly and severally in the sum total of thirty seven thousand one hundred and eighty-eight euros (EUR 37 188); |
| --- | --- |

—

to uphold the present action for damages, in accordance with Article 288 EC, and declare the applicant is entitled to be financially compensated by the Council and the Commission jointly and severally in the sum total of thirty seven thousand one hundred and eighty-eight euros (EUR 37 188);

| — | to order the defendant institutions to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

to order the defendant institutions to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those already put forward in Case T-217/07 Las Palmeras v Council and Commission.

Las Palmeras

Council and Commission

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Open your eyes to energy waste

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Open your eyes to energy waste 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. American Forces Information Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 91-0627-P. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Armed Forces 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; 44; Defense billboard (1988) ; #44. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Case No. 8,551.

#### LOVEJOY v. WILSON.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 102.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1802.

Witness — Inteiíested in Subject — Testimony upon Collateral Pacts — Assumpsit—Account —No Account Piled — Monet Lent.

1. In assumpsit for goods sold and delivered, the defendant may prove a partnership between the plaintiff and tlie witness by the witness.

2. In a count “for sundry matters properly chargeable in account.” if no account be annexed, the words which refer to an account as annexed, may be rejected; and money lent may be given in evidence upon that count.

Assumpsit, for stone and sand sold and delivered. The defendant produced Owen Mc-Glue as a witness to prove a partnership between the witness and the plaintiff, and that this was a joint contract.

Mr. Gantt, for plaintiff,

objected that the witness was interested.

THE COURT decided that he was a competent witness to prove the partnership; but should not be compelled to give evidence of payments made by tlie defendant during the partnership. (Quaere.)

One of the counts, in the case was indebi-tatus assumpsit, “for sundry matters properly chargeable in account as by a particular account thereof, herewith into court brought, may more fully appear.” No account was filed. The plaintiff offered evidence of money lent. The defendant objected that it could not be given on that count.

KILTY, Chief Judge,

was of opinion that the evidence was applicable to that count. No account being filed, the words “as by a particular account,” &c., must be rejected as surplusage, and then the count will stand as a general indebitatus assumpsit “for sundry matters chargeable in account;” and money lent is a matter chargeable in account.

MARSHALL, Circuit Judge, and CRANCH, Circuit Judge, did not object

(Quaere as to this point.)
Case: 2:11-cv-00303-JLG-EPD Doc #: 26 Filed: 03/08/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T10:20:07-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LORENZO COMPTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 288 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of December, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
(Reap. Dec. 10219)

#### Isaac B. Cohen & Sons, Inc*.*D. Hauser, Inc. v. United States

Entry No. 987424.

*606(Decided April 5, 1962)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*William M. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement for decision upon stipulation, reading as follows :

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise embraced by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above at the time of exportation to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was the invoice unit values (the ex-factory prices) plus the shipping or E.O.B. charges only exclusive of the 2% inspection fee or charges.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402a(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise involved and that such values are the invoice unit values (the ex-factory prices), plus the shipping or f.o.b. charges only, exclusive of the 2 per centum inspection fee or charges.

Judgment will issue accordingly.