alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007269EN.01001402.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 September 2007 — Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), F.M.G. Textiles Srl, formerly Marine Enterprise Projects — Società Unipersonale di Alberto Fiorenzi Srl

(Case C-234/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Registration of the trade mark BAINBRIDGE - Opposition by the proprietor of earlier national trade marks all having the component ‘Bridge’ in common - Opposition rejected - Family of trade marks - Proof of use - Concept of ‘defensive trade marks’)

(2007/C 269/27)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA (represented by: P.L. Roncaglia, A. Torrigiani Malaspina and M. Boletto, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Montalto and M. Buffolo, Agents), F.M.G. Textiles Srl, formerly Marine Enterprise Projects — Società Unipersonale di Alberto Fiorenza Srl (represented by: D. Marchi, avvocato)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 23 February 2006 in Case T-194/03 Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA v OHIM dismissing an action brought by the proprietor of the word, figurative and three-dimensional trade marks ‘Bridge’, ‘Old Bridge’, ‘The Bridge Basket’, ‘THE BRIDGE’, ‘The Bridge’, ‘FOOTBRIDGE’, ‘The Bridge Wayfarer’ and ‘OVER THE BRIDGE’, for goods in Classes 18 and 25, for annulment of Decision R 1015/2001-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 17 March 2003 dismissing the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition to the application for registration of the figurative mark ‘Bainbridge’ for goods in Classes 18 and 25.

Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA

OHIM

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1)

dismisses the appeal;

| 2) | orders Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

orders Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 29.7.2006.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, Stephen A. Aanderud, Chief Financial Officer of DayStar Technologies, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DayStar Technologies, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2005; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 12, 2005
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TE XAS

NO. WR-48,152-08

Ex parte G ARCIA G LEN WHIT E, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US

IN CAUSE NO. 723847 IN THE 180 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT T H

HARRIS COUNTY

R IC H A R D S O N

, J

. , f

i l e d a c o n c u r r i n g o p i n i o n i n w h i c h H E R V E Y a n d N E W E L L

, J J

. , j o i n e d

.

C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

I a g r e e w i t h t h e C o u r t ’ s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e s t a t u t o r y l a n g u a g e i n q u e s t i o n

. I t w o u l d

s e e m t h a t t h e p l a i n l a n g u a g e o f A r t i c l e 1 1

. 0 7 3 r e s t r i c t s t h e m e a n i n g o f t h e p h r a s e

, “ w o u l d

n o t h a v e b e e n c o n v i c t e d

, ” t o a p p l y o n l y t o t h e v e r d i c t o f g u i l t a n d n o t t o t h e a s s e s s m e n t o f

p u n i s h m e n t

. T h i s i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e C o u r t ’ s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h i s e x a c t p h r a s e i n E x p a r t e

G u t i e r r e z

, 3 3 7 S

. W

. 3 d 8 8 3

, 9 0 1 ( T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. 2 0 1 1 )

. A n d

, a s n o t e d b y t h e m a j o r i t y

,

G u t i e r r e z w a s d e c i d e d t w o y e a r s b e f o r e A r t i c l e 1 1

. 0 7 3 w a s e n a c t e d

. T h e L e g i s l a t u r e w a s

a w a r e o f h o w t h e p h r a s e

, “ w o u l d n o t h a v e b e e n c o n v i c t e d

, ” w o u l d b e i n t e r p r e t e d b y t h i s

C o u r t

. H a d t h e L e g i s l a t u r e i n t e n d e d A r t i c l e 1 1

. 0 7 3 t o a p p l y t o p u n i s h m e n t

, i t c o u l d h a v e

e x p l i c i t l y s a i d s o

. T h e r e f o r e

, I j o i n t h e m a

j o r i t y

.W h i t e C o n c u r r i n g O p i n i o n

— 2

H o w e v e r

, t h i s i s a h a r s h r e s u l t

, p a r t i c u l a r l y i n a d e a t h p e n a l t y c a s e w h e r e t h e j u r y i s

o f t e n a s k e d t o e v a l u a t e e x p e r t s c i e n t i f i c t e s t i m o n y a n d s c i e n t i f i c e v i d e n c e i n a s s e s s i n g

w h e t h e r t h e d e a t h p e n a l t y i s t h e p r o p e r p u n i s h m e n t

. T h e p o i n t s m a d e b y t h e d i s s e n t i n g

o p i n i o n a r e v a l i d

. I n m y o p i n i o n

, A r t i c l e 1 1

. 0 7 3 s h o u l d h a v e b e e n w r i t t e n t o a p p l y t o b o t h

t h e g u i l t a n d p u n i s h m e n t p h a s e s o f a t r i a l

— a t l e a s t a d e a t h p e n a l t y t r i a l

.

F I L E D : N o v e m b e r 2

, 2 0 1 6

P U B L I S H
Exhibit 32(a)



TXU ENERGY COMPANY LLC

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO



The undersigned, Paul OMalley, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive of TXU Energy Company LLC (the Company), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed
this 12th day of May, 2005.



/s/ Paul OMalleyName:

Paul OMalleyTitle:

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TXU Energy Company LLC and will be retained by TXU Energy Company LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 56071.

protest 167794-K (St. Louis).

#### Wald & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 48011.

#### Protests 20124-K, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the items in question consist of hats or hoods composed of ramie and cellophane, the samé' in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 47291. In accordance therewith, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 21

- 00028

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF N.M.B. From the 438th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016

- EM5

- 06049 Honorable Antonia Arteaga , Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice Delivered and Filed: April 20, 2022 DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant C.B. 1 appeals from the trial court’s Order in Suit Affecting the Parent

- Child Relationship. On February 18, 20 22, we ordered Appellant C.B. to provide written proof to this court on or before February 28, 2022 that she had paid the required fee to the court reporter for preparation of the reporter’s record. We explained that if Appellant C.B. failed to respond wit hin the time provided, her appellant’s brief would be due March 21, 2022 , and we would only consider those issues or points raised in her brief that did not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c).

1 To protect the identity of the minor child, we refer to the parties by fictitious names, initials, or aliases. See T EX
. F AM
. C ODE § 109.002(d)

.04

- 21

- 00028

- CV

- 2

- Appellant C.B. did not res pond to our February 18, 2022 order. Therefore, her appellant’s brief was due March 21, 2002. On March 22, 2022, w hen she did not file her brief, we ordered Appellant C.B. to file, on or before April 6, 2022, her appellant’s brief and a written response

re asonably explaining (1) her failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by her failure to timely file a brief. We explained that if Appellant C.B. failed to file a brief and the written response by April 6, 2022 , her appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a); see also T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3 (c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply with a court order). Appellant C.B. has failed to respond to our March 22, 20 22 order. Therefore, we dismiss her appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(c). PER CURIAM
# C_2007297EN.01003502.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/35

---

Order of the President of the Court of 6 September 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Hungary

(Case C-148/07) (1)

1

(2007/C 297/68)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.

1

---
#### I. Freeman & Son, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6666.

Entry No. 744004.

Invoice dated London, England, February 11, 1942.

Certified February 11, 1942.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 25, 1942.

(Decided December 23, 1946)

*Goldwater & Flynn*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section •402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by -ifche appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
exv10w1






EXHIBIT 10.1




STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES CORPORATION




EXECUTIVE OFFICERS’ BONUS PLANS




The following summarizes the terms of bonus arrangements with respect to certain of our executive
officers:



MALCOLM S. MORRIS, as Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer, shall receive, in
addition to his salary, 1.00% of the first $20,000,000 of the consolidated pretax income
(calculated after deducting minority interests) of Stewart Title Guaranty Company as reported to
its stockholder, 0.75% of the pretax profits from $20,000,001 to $40,000,000, 0.50% of the pretax
profits from $40,000,001 to $60,000,000, and 0.35% of the pretax profits exceeding $60,000,000.



STEWART MORRIS, JR., as President and Co-Chief Executive Officer, shall receive, in addition to his
salary, 1.00% of the first $20,000,000 of the consolidated pretax income (calculated after
deducting minority interests) of Stewart Title Guaranty Company as reported to its stockholder,
0.75% of the pretax profits from $20,000,001 to $40,000,000, 0.50% of the pretax profits from
$40,000,001 to $60,000,000, and 0.35% of the pretax profits exceeding $60,000,000.



MAX CRISP, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, shall receive, in addition to
his salary, 0.50% of the first $50,000,000 of the consolidated pretax income (calculated after
deducting minority interests) of Stewart Title Guaranty Company as reported to its stockholder,
0.40% of the pretax profits from $50,000,001 to $75,000,000, 0.30% of the pretax profits from
$75,000,001 to $100,000,000 and 0.20% of the pretax profits exceeding $100,000,000. Mr. Crisp’s
compensation from base salary plus bonus shall not exceed 75% of the total base salary plus bonus
earned by a Chief Executive Officer.



MATTHEW W. MORRIS, as Senior Executive Vice President, shall receive, in addition to his salary,
0.30% of the first $100,000,000 of the consolidated pretax income (calculated after deducting
minority interests) of Stewart Title Guaranty Company as reported to its stockholder, and 0.20% of
the pretax profits exceeding $100,000,000.
May 28, 2015

Mr. Scott Biddle

512 Cessna Avenue Friday Harbor, WA 98250

Dear Mr. Scott Biddle:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 22, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1113), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Case: 2:11-cv-00348-EAS-TPK Doc #: 34 Filed: 10/06/11 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00348-EAS-TPK Doc #: 34 Filed: 10/06/11 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T12:20:17-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Fertility and the status of women

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Fertility and the status of women 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Agency for International Development. Office of Population. Demography Division 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Population Reference Bureau 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Tables providing statistical information concerning female population, fertility rates, mortality rates, etc., for most regions and countries. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  145 × 59 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  022614680.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
March 23,2012

The Honorable

Ray LaHood U.S. Deparlment

of Transportation 1200New Jersey

Ave, SE Washington,

DC 20590 Re: Alaska Airlines' application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029 Dear Secretary

LaHood: The University of San Diego (USD) wishes to add its support

to the application

of Alaska Airlines for air service between

San Diego and Washington Reagan National Airyoft (DCA). As the eighthn.rajor city in the United States, San Diego is the largest regionwithout regular, nonstop service to DCA. Additionally, due to the profound community of interest between

San Diego and the nation's capital, the region generates

the largestpassenger

market demandwithout nonstop serviceto the convenient

and close-in

airporl seruing

our nation's capital. San Diego's sheer

marketsize

to Washington

coupled with the fact that San Diego Dr"rlles average airfares arethe highest

of west coast

cities should

qualify it for a pair of the limited slots

available. The high airfareis exacerbated when factoring

in taxi fares flom Dr-rlles

to Washington's

city center

that average

about $60 each

way. Thrs means travelers

between

Washington's

city center

and San Diego via Dulles can pay on average

close to $400 one-way. As a private (non-profit), Roman Catholic institution of higher learning, the University of San Diego enrolls about 7,800 undergraduate, graduate

and law students

from around the country. USD ofTers a rigorous academic

program through six schools:

Collegeof Arts and Sciences, Schoolof Business

Administration,

School of Law, Hahn School of Nursing

and Health

Science,

Joan B. Kroc School

of Peace Studies and the SchoolofLeadershinand Education Sciences. Alaska Airlines service would add a needed

nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, DC. USD joins with the San Diego County Regional Airporl Authority, the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, the World Trade CenterSan Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber

of Commerce

rn supporl

of Alaska Airlines' application for San Diego - Washington Reagan National slots. We thank the Deparlment of Transporlation

for the opportunity

to comment

on the aboveref-erenced

docket and we hopeto hearof a favorable review of Alaska Airlines' San Diego DCA proposal soon. Sincerely,

ThomasCleary SeniorDirector,Community and GovemmentRelations

Office of Public

Relations Maher Hall,

Room 264 5998 Alcal;i Park, SanDiego,

CA92110-2492 Phone: (61 9) 260-4659.

Fax: (61 9) 260-6820 www.sa ndiego.ed

u