alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highland Hospitality Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas W. Vicari, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 6, 2005



/s/ Douglas W. VicariExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Samuel A. Lewis, as Collector of Estate of Julia M. Stanton, *Deceased.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion *Per Curia/m.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1676

NATHANIEL M. COSTLEY, SR., The Estate of Mary Jane Costley; THE 

ESTATE OF MARY JANE COSTLEY,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, 

Individually and as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP; 

GREEN TREE LENDING; NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

COUNTY WIDE HOME LOAN,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-02488-ELH)

Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa O. Martinez, MCGUIREWOODS, 

LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Henry Falkner Reichner, REED SMITH, LLP, Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr., personally and on behalf of the Estate of Mary Jane 

Costley, appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the 

Defendants in his action alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. 

§§ 1601-1667f (2012), and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692–

1692p (2012), as well as claims of fraud, breach of contract, and conversion in 

connection with loans extended to his grandmother in 2006 and 2007, and denying his 

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Costley v. Bank of 

Am., N.A., No. 1:13-cv-02488-ELH (D. Md. May 9, 2017, Nov. 20, 2017, & May 18, 

2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9285 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3913 Leland Avenue Northwest in Comstock Park, Michigan, as the 

‘‘Captain Miguel Justin Nava Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2024 

Ms. SCHOLTEN (for herself, Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. HUIZENGA, 

Mr. WALBERG, Mrs. DINGELL, Ms. SLOTKIN, Mr. KILDEE, Mrs. 

MCCLAIN, Mr. JAMES, Ms. STEVENS, Ms. TLAIB, and Mr. THANEDAR) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3913 Leland Avenue Northwest in Comstock 

Park, Michigan, as the ‘‘Captain Miguel Justin Nava 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN MIGUEL JUSTIN NAVA POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3913 Leland Avenue Northwest 

6 in Comstock Park, Michigan, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Captain Miguel Justin Nava Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9285 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Miguel Justin 

5 Nava Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 49790.

#### Protests 96492-K, etc., of R. & J. Dick Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the-authority of *United States*v. *United States Rubber Co.*(31 C. C. P. A. 174, C. A. D. 269) the merchandise was held entitled to free entry as claimed.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the Annual Report of First Titan Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Federowicz, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)   the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”); and  (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  FIRST TITAN CORP.  /s/ Robert Federowicz Robert Federowicz Interim President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Director  Date:   January 14, 2014
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of ShangPharma Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael Xin Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2012



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Michael Xin Hui    
|Name:  |  | Michael Xin Hui        
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
Case No. 6,849.

#### HUIDEKOPER v. BURRUS.

[1 Wash. C. C. 257.] 1

Circuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

April Term, 1805.

Pleading — Motion in Akrest or Judgment — Formal Defects in Declaration.

Motion for arrest of judgment; because, the ejectment against the casual ejector, was wrong entitled, and for other defendants. The declaration to which the real defendant had pleaded, was right. The motion was overruled.

Mr. Ingersoll, for plaintiff,

admitted; that, in the declaration against the casual ejector, there exists the mistake alleged; but, a new declaration was filed in the present circuit court, and properly entitled: to which declaration the defendant pleaded, that the land, in this declaration, is stated to lie in the district of Pennsylvania; which, after the repeal of the former circuit court law, was sufficient.

Rule discharged.

1

 [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard Peters, Jr., Esq.]

This was a motion in arrest of judgment [in the- case of Huidekoper v. Burrus, Case No. 6,848], because the action is brought, as of April sessions, 1802, in the circuit court of the United States, in and for the Eastern district of Pennsylvania; whereas no such sessions was ever held or established by law. 2d. The land is not stated to be in the Eastern district of Pennsylvania, though the action is.brought in and for the Eastern district. 3d. No title in the plaintiff at the time of the entry and ouster, stated in the declaration.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Parallax Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Norman A. Kunin, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the  periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Norman A. Kunin     |
|-------------------------|
| Norman A. Kunin         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| April 15, 2011          |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

                                                                        

----
(Reap. Dec. 8902)

Entry No. 14070, etc.

#### States Mercantile Co. *v.*United States

(Decided July 10, 1957)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows concerning the merchandise referred to below:

> 1) The merchandise covered by the appeals specified in the attached schedule consists of sodium para-amino salicylate which on the dates of exportation had an American selling price as defined in section 402 (g), Tariff Act of 1930, of $2.70 less 1 percent per pound, plus drums at $2 each. Also, that para-amino salicylate is dutiable on the basis of American selling price.

> 2) Upon this stipulation these appeals may be deemed to be submitted.

*567On tbe agreed facts I find the American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the sodium para-amino salicylate here involved, and that such value was $2.70 per pound, less 1 per centum, plus drums at $2 each.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4890 — Arcelor/SFG) Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 248 , 23/10/2007 P. 0024 - 0024 *

20071023

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4890 — Arcelor/SFG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 248/12)

1. On 16 October 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] by which the undertaking Arcelor Luxembourg S.A. ("Arcelor Luxembourg", Luxembourg) controlled by the ArcelorMittal group ("ArcelorMittal", Luxembourg) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Saar Ferngas AG ("SFG", Germany) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Arcelor Luxembourg: production of steel and provision of related services,

- for ArcelorMittal: production of steel and provision of related services,

- for SFG: purchase, transport, storage and supply of natural gas to local wholesalers, industrial customers and power stations and provision of related services.

3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4890 — Arcelor/SFG, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|           |   |                     |   |
|----------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
| April 29, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Marc A. Buehler |   |
|           |   | Marc A. Buehler          |   |
|           |   | Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|           |   |                     |   |
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9103 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to establish an Air Force Technical 

Training Center of Excellence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2024 

Mr. JACKSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to establish an 

Air Force Technical Training Center of Excellence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Air Force Technical 

5 Training Enhancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF AIR FORCE TECHNICAL TRAIN7 ING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE. 

8 Chapter 903 of title 10, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following new section: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9103 IH

1 ‘‘§ 9025. Air Force Technical Training Center of Ex2 cellence 

3 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of the Air 

4 Force shall operate a Technical Training Center of Excel5 lence. The head of the Center shall be the designee of the 

6 Commander of Airmen Development Command. 

7 ‘‘(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Center shall be 

8 to— 

9 ‘‘(1) facilitate collaboration among all Air Force 

10 technical training installations; 

11 ‘‘(2) serve as a premier training location for all 

12 maintainers throughout the military departments; 

13 ‘‘(3) publish a set of responsibilities aimed at 

14 driving excellence, innovation, and leadership across 

15 all technical training specialties; 

16 ‘‘(4) advocate for innovative improvements in 

17 curriculum, facilities, and medial; 

18 ‘‘(5) foster outreach with industry and aca19 demia; 

20 ‘‘(6) identify and promulgate best practices, 

21 standards, and benchmarks; 

22 ‘‘(7) create a hub of excellence for the latest ad23 vancements in aviation technology and training 

24 methodologies; and 

25 ‘‘(8) carry out such other responsibilities as the 

26 Secretary determines appropriate. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9103 IH

1 ‘‘(c) LOCATION.—The Secretary shall select a loca2 tion for the Center that is an Air Force installation that 

3 provides technical training and maintenance proficiency.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Case: 2:11-cv-00352-EAS-NMK Doc #: 5 Filed: 05/17/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       UT
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
TAMPA  ELECTIC  COMPANY  BALANCE  SHEETS,  STATEMENTS  OF  INCOME  AND
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000096271
<NAME>                          Tampa Electric Company
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-mos
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        2,663
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          8
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             303
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           243
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,217
<COMMON>                                           119
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                          919
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                299
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               774
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     116
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        5
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     985
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    3,217
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                          693
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                43
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         546
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         589
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            104
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     104
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            31
<NET-INCOME>                                        73
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       73
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            63
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           21
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             152
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00

</TABLE>
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

REBECCA OLIVER,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

CASE NO. C2-11-447

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

SECURITY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE NORAH MCCANN KING

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the OPINION AND ORDER filed September 6, 2012, the decision of 

the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of

Social Security for further consideration of the plaintiff’s residual functional capacity. 

FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 

Date: September 6, 2012 JOHN HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00447-EAS-NMK Doc #: 28 Filed: 09/06/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007315EN.01002301.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/23

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-114/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - The Community code relating to medicinal products for human use - Directive 2004/24/EC - Traditional herbal medicinal products - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2007/C 315/39)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky and M. Šimerdová, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: T. Boček, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 85)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending, as regards traditional herbal medicinal products, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.

1

---
No. 45110.

#### Protests 473304-G, etc., of C. Germain et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar to that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.