# C_2007247EN.01004601.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/46

---

Corrigendum to the notice in the Official Journal in Case T-263/07

(
  ‘Official Journal of the European Union’ C 223 of 22 September 2007, p 12
  )

(
  ‘Official Journal of the European Union’ C 223 of 22 September 2007, p 12

(2007/C 247/74)

The notice in the Official Journal in Case T-263/07 Estonia v Commission should read as follows:

Estonia

Commission

‘Action brought on 16 July 2007 — Estonia v Commission

(Case T-263/07)

(2007/C 223/17)

Language of the case: Estonian

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Estonia (represented by Lembit Uibo, Agent)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 4 May 2007 concerning the national greenhouse gas allocation plan submitted by Estonia in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 4 May 2007 concerning the national greenhouse gas allocation plan submitted by Estonia in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission's decision of 4 May 2007 concerning the national greenhouse gas allocation plan submitted by Estonia in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council should be annulled on the following grounds:

| — | Infringement of Article 9(1) and (3) and Article 11(2) of Directive 2003/87/EC and the consequent exceeding of competence; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 9(1) and (3) and Article 11(2) of Directive 2003/87/EC and the consequent exceeding of competence;

| — | Manifest errors of assessment, since the Commission did not take into account correct information available to it, but relied on false assumptions which directly and essentially affected the outcome of the contested decision and the determination of the overall amount of emission allowances; |
| --- | --- |

—

Manifest errors of assessment, since the Commission did not take into account correct information available to it, but relied on false assumptions which directly and essentially affected the outcome of the contested decision and the determination of the overall amount of emission allowances;

| — | Infringement of Article 175(2)(c) EC, since under the EC Treaty the Commission does not have competence to adopt measures which significantly affect a Member State's choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 175(2)(c) EC, since under the EC Treaty the Commission does not have competence to adopt measures which significantly affect a Member State's choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply;

| — | Breach of the principle of good administration, since the Commission did not take account when taking its decision of all the essential circumstances present in the individual case and did not verify whether all the assumptions made when taking its decision were correct; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of the principle of good administration, since the Commission did not take account when taking its decision of all the essential circumstances present in the individual case and did not verify whether all the assumptions made when taking its decision were correct;

| — | Breach of the obligation to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of the obligation to state reasons.

---

(1)  Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32.’

1

---