alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Quality, a national priority for the decade

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Quality, a national priority for the decade 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  Federal Quality Institute (U.S.) 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 46 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  PM1_53_Qu2.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
|   |   |                                 |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Charles P. Pizzi            |   |
|   |   | Charles P. Pizzi                     |   |
|   |   | President andChief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |                                 |   |

|                         |   |                                             |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   |                                             |   |
|                         | By:    | /s/ Paul D. Ridder                          |   |
|                         |   | Paul D. Ridder                                   |   |
|                         |   | Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer |   |
|                         |   |                                             |   |
|                         |   |                                             |   |
|                         |   |                                             |   |
| Date:  May 6, 2010 |   |                                             |   |
# C_2007235EN.01002202.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/22

---

Action brought on 6 August 2007 — Motopress v OHIM — Sony Computer Entertainment Europe (BUZZ!)

(Case T-302/07)

(2007/C 235/41)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Motopress Werbe- und Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: L. Wiltschek, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Amend the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 June 2007 (Appeal No R 1468/2006-2) to the extent required in order to grant the opposition to trade mark Application No 4 441 044; |
| --- | --- |

—

Amend the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 June 2007 (Appeal No R 1468/2006-2) to the extent required in order to grant the opposition to trade mark Application No 4 441 044;

| — | In the alternative, annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘BUZZ!’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 28 and 41 (Application No 4 441 044).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the Applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Austrian word mark ‘BUZZ!’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35 and 38.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 74(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) caused by disregard of evidence of the existence of the mark on which opposition is based.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Jamie L. Buskill, certify that:

1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Texas Gas Transmission, LLC;

2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5)

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Dated:  July 29, 2005

/s/ Jamie L. Buskill



Jamie L. Buskill

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





The undersigned executive officer of Alliance Bancorp, Inc, of Pennsylvania (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: March 18, 2011
/s/Dennis D. CirucciDennis D. CirucciPresident andChief Executive Officer





Note:
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### United States *v.*V. P. Fleming

No. 7540.

Entry No. 707388.

Invoice dated Cleckheaton, England, July 14, 1947.

Certified July 15, 1947.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 5, 1947.

(Decided February 11, 1948)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant .not represented by counsel.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, that “B. B. A.” Chemically Pure Blue Asbestos Yarn, such as or similar to the “B. B. A.” Chemically Pure Blue Asbestos Yarn covered by the above numbered re-appraisement case, was at the time of exportation of such or similar merchandise to the United States freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, at four (4) Shillings Sterling, per pound, (LB), plus cases as invoiced, and that there was no-higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the “B. B. A.” Chemically Pure Blue Asbestos Yarn here involved, and that such value was sterling 0-4-0 per pound, plus cases as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JUDGMENT IN CIVIL CASE 

CLARENCE L. LACKEY III, 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:11-CV-220

JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

RJ WHEELS, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have

been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That pursuant to the June

20, 2011 Order Granting Joint Motion for In Camera Review,

to Approve Settlement and to Dismiss Case with Prejudice with

Prejudice, the Court DISMISSES this action, each party to bear

its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

Date: June 20, 2011 James Bonini, Clerk

 s/Betty L. Clark 

 Betty L. Clark/Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00220-ALM-NMK Doc #: 7 Filed: 06/20/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007136EN.01002501.xml

| 20.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/25

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 June 2007

(2007/C 136/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3403 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 165,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4452 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67465 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4172 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6627 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0790 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5836 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,597 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,78 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7966 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2190 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,733 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7464 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5876 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4302 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4788 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7742 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0609 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 243,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5086 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2097 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3400 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 962,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6073 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,614 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,7850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,254 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3403

JPY

Japanese yen

165,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4452

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67465

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4172

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6627

ISK

Iceland króna

83,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0790

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5836

CZK

Czech koruna

28,597

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,78

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7966

RON

Romanian leu

3,2190

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,733

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7464

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5876

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4302

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4788

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7742

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0609

KRW

South Korean won

1 243,46

ZAR

South African rand

9,5086

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2097

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3400

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 962,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6073

PHP

Philippine peso

61,614

RUB

Russian rouble

34,7850

THB

Thai baht

43,254

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Case No. 13,890.

#### In re THOMAS.

[3 N. B. R. 38 (Quarto, 7).] 1

District Court, D. New Jersey.

June 22, 1869.

Bankruptcy — Pkoceedings in State Court — Injunction — Motion to Dissolve.

Where an injunction had been issued under the act of the district court, staying proceedings against bankrupt in the state courts until the question of final discharge should be determined, and final discharge was granted and motion made to dissolve said injunction, *held,*that the motion was unnecessary, as the order for the final discharge terminated the injunction.

[In the matter of Veeder G. Thomas, a bankrupt.] Motion by creditor to dissolve an injunction after final discharge. On the 25th day of March, A. D. 1869, an injunction was granted by FIELD. District Judge, upon the petition of said bankrupt, restraining a creditor from prosecuting his suit against said Thomas in the state court of New York, until the question of the debtor’s discharge should have been determined. On the 25th day of May, 1869, the said bankrupt received his final discharge in bankruptcy. Upon motion, this day made, to have the said injunction dissolved, it was held that the effect of the final discharge was to terminate the injunction; that no order to show this termination would be necessary. The language of the injunction was in accordance with the statute, and continued in force only until the question of the final discharge could be determined. The bankrupt must hereafter use his discharge as his protection, in cases thereby affected.

William L. Dayton, attorney for creditor.

Before FIELD, District Judge.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9260 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9260

To prohibit State excise taxes on firearms and ammunition manufacturers 
                              and dealers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2024

Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Collins, Ms. Tenney, 
 Mr. Mills, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Langworthy, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Duncan, 
  Mr. Womack, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Griffith, and Mr. Williams of Texas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit State excise taxes on firearms and ammunition manufacturers 
                              and dealers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom from Unfair Gun Taxes Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON STATE EXCISE TAXES.

    (a) In General.--A State, and any political subdivision thereof, 
may not levy or collect an excise tax on the sale of a firearm, 
ammunition, or a part or component of a firearm or ammunition by a 
manufacturer or dealer that occurs in or affecting interstate or 
foreign commerce.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall be 
construed to alter, modify, or otherwise affect the Pittman-Robertson 
Wildlife Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Estuaries: scenes of transition

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Estuaries: scenes of transition 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  2000-2010 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  196 × 65 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  54388734.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Case No. 9,159.

#### MARTIN et al. v. CRISCUOLA.

[10 Blatchf. 211.] 2

Circuit Court, E. D. New York.

Oct. 4, 1872.

Practice at Law — In Conformity with State— Summons in Name of Plaintiff’s Attorneys.

The effect of the 5th section of the act of June 1, 1872 (17 Stat. Í97), which provides, that the practice, pleadings, and forms and modes of proceeding, in other than equity and admiralty causes, in the circuit and district courts of the United States, shall conform, as near as may be, to the practice, pleadings, and forms and modes of proceeding, existing at the time, in like causes, in the courts of record of the state within which such circuit or district courts are held, is not to authorize the commencement of an action at law in the circuit court by a summons issued in the name of the plaintiff’s attorney, according to the mode of commencing actions in the courts of the state of New York.

[Cited in Johnson v. Healy, Case No. 7,389.]

[Action by Francis D. Martin and others against L. Criscuola.]

Goodrich & Wheeler, for plaintiffs.

Beebe, Donohue & Cooke, for defendant.

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This motion raises the question, whether the effect of the 5th section of the act of June 1, 1872 (17 Stat. 197), which provides, that the practice, pleadings, and forms and modes of proceeding, in other than equity and admiralty causes, in the circuit and district courts of the United States, shall conform, as near as may be, to the practice, pleadings, and forms and modes of proceeding, existing at the time, in like causes, in the courts of record of the state within which such circuit or district courts are held, is to authorize the commencement of an action at law in this court by a summons issued in the name of the plaintiff’s attorney, according to the mode of commencing actions in the courts of the state of New York.

This question, I learn, upon inquiry, has already received the consideration of the circuit judge of this circuit, and he has advised the clerk of the circuit court for the Southern district of New York, that the act referred to does not authorize the commencement of an action at law' by such a summons. This action of the circuit judge makes it proper that the practice in this district be made to conform to that directed by the circuit judge, in the Southern district, and, accordingly, the summons served in this action must be set aside, as unauthorized by any law of the United States.