alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with this annual report of
Globus Maritime Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elias Deftereos, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 27, 2012



|By: | /s/ Elias Deftereos            | 
|--- | ------------------------------ | 
|    | Name: Elias Deftereos          | 
|    | Title: Chief Financial Officer |
Summary of Director Compensation Program



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Duke Energy Corporation 
 Director Compensation Program 
  

													
	 	  	 	  	Meeting Fees
	 Type of Fee
	  	Fee (Other
Than for
Meetings)	  	In-Person
Attendance at
Meetings Held
in Conjunction
with a Regular
Board
of
Directors
Meeting	  	In-Person
Meetings Not
Held in
Conjunction
with a Regular
Board
of
Directors
Meeting	  	Telephonic
Participation
in Meetings
					
	 Annual Board of Directors Retainer (Cash)
	  	$	50,000	  			  			  		
	 Annual Board of Directors Retainer (Stock)
	  	$	100,000	  			  			  		
	 Board of Directors Meeting Fees
	  			  	$	2,000	  	$	2,500	  	$	2,000
	 Annual Lead Director Retainer
	  	$	35,000	  			  			  		
	 Annual Audit Committee Chair Retainer
	  	$	20,000	  			  			  		
	 Annual Chair Retainer (Other Committees)
	  	$	10,000	  			  			  		
	 Audit Committee Meeting Fees
	  			  	$	3,000	  	$	2,500	  	$	2,000
	 Nuclear Oversight Committee Meeting Fees
	  			  	$	4,000	  	$	2,500	  	$	2,000
	 Other Committee Meeting Fees
	  			  	$	2,000	  	$	2,500	  	$	2,000

 Except for the portion of the annual Board retainer that is provided in stock, which amount is granted once each
year, fees and retainers are paid on a quarterly basis. Directors may elect to defer fees and retainers under the Duke Energy Corporation Directors’ Savings Plan. Under the Duke Energy Foundation Matching Gifts Program, Directors are eligible
for matching contributions of up to $5,000 per Director per calendar year to qualifying institutions. The Company also maintains a Charitable Giving Program for Directors who served on the Duke Power Company LLC Board of Directors on or prior to
February 18, 1998, pursuant to which the Company will make, upon such Director’s death (or during his or her lifetime, under certain circumstances), donations of up to $1,000,000 to charitable organizations selected by the Director. The
Company provides travel insurance to Directors, and reimburses Directors for expenses reasonably incurred in connection with attendance and participation at Board and Committee meetings and special functions.
# C_2007315EN.01001701.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/17

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 October 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Fortum Project Finance SA

(Case C-240/06) (1)

1

(Article 56(1) EC - Directive 69/335/EEC - Article 12(1)(a) and (c) - Exception to the prohibition on double taxation of contributions of capital - Contribution of capital in the form of shares to a company established in another Member State - Exchange of shares - Capital transfer tax)

(2007/C 315/27)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fortum Project Finance SA

Applicant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Interpretation of Article 56 EC and Article 12(1)(c) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ, English Special Edition 1969(II), p. 412) — Derogation from the prohibition of double taxation concerning tax on capital contributions — Contribution in the form of securities to a company established in another Member State — Share transfer tax

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital, as amended by Council Directive 85/303/EEC of 10 June 1985, must be interpreted as meaning that Article 12(1)(c) does not apply to the charging of a duty, such as Finnish capital transfer tax (varainsiirtovero), where securities are transferred as a contribution to a capital company which gives new shares of its own as consideration for that transfer. Article 12(1)(a) of the directive allows such a duty to be charged.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 29.7.2006.

1

---
# C_2007238EN.01000602.xml

| 10.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4821 — CVC/Taminco)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 238/05)

On 24 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4821. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4821. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9075 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty for fraudulent 

misrepresentation about the receipt of a military decoration or medal, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2024 

Ms. VAN DUYNE (for herself and Mr. MCCORMICK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the 

penalty for fraudulent misrepresentation about the receipt of a military decoration or medal, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Valor Earned Not Sto5 len Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9075 IH

1 SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION ABOUT RE2 CEIPT OF A MILITARY MEDAL OR DECORA3 TION. 

4 (a) INCREASED PENALTY.— 

5 (1) MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.—Sec6 tion 704(b) of title 18, United States Code, is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘one year’’ and inserting ‘‘three 

8 years’’. 

9 (2) CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR.—Sec10 tion 704(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

11 amended by striking ‘‘1 year’’ and inserting ‘‘three 

12 years’’. 

13 (3) COMBAT BADGE.—Section 704(d)(1) of title 

14 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘1 

15 year’’ and inserting ‘‘three years’’. 

16 (b) STUDY.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

17 of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General, in co18 ordination with the Inspector General of the Department 

19 of Veterans Affairs and such other agency head as may 

20 be relevant, shall conduct a study to identify any monetary 

21 or government benefits obtained through a fraudulent mis22 representation about the receipt of a military decoration 

23 or medal as described by section 704(c)(2) or 704(d) of 

24 title 18, United States Code. 

25 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

26 of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9075 IH

1 report to Congress on the findings of the study conducted 

2 under subsection (b) and policy recommendations to re3 solve issues identified in the study. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 4, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00569

- CV

IN RE April Marie SINGER

, Individually and as Trustee of the Singer Financial Man a gement Trust

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On August 23, 2019, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for interim relief seeking a stay of the complained

- of trial court order. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the re lief sought. Accordingly, the petition

for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a). The motion for interim relief is

DENIED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on September 4, 2019

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of September, 2019

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI0314 5, styled Robert C. Singer, III v. April Marie Singer, Individually and as Trustee of the Singer Financial Management Trust , pending in the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Larry Noll presiding.
November 13, 1951

No. 56091.

protest 129157-K/1089.

#### National Carloading Corp. *v.*United States,

C. D. 1320. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 41912.

#### Protests 942365-G, etc., of Lord & Taylor et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of harmonicas the same as those the subject of Abstract 40586. The claim as musical instruments at 40 percent under paragraph 1541 was sustained.
Order filed September 24, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00545

- CV

____________ SILVA RUBIO , Appellant

V. HARRIS COUNTY, ET AL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 27216



### ORDER
We direct the Harris County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing intervenor Silva Rubio’s Motion for Reconsideration of the May 10, 2019 Order to Disburse Excess Proceeds

. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The supplemental clerk’s record is due on or before October 4, 2019

. If the requested item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certification so stating.

P ER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant.
# C_2007211EN.01000402.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 July 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht, Germany) — Wendy Geven v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

(Case C-213/05) (1)

1

(Frontier worker - Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 - Child-raising allowance - Not granted - Social advantage - Residence condition)

(2007/C 211/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundessozialgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Wendy Geven

Applicant:

Defendant: Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundessozialgericht — Interpretation of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1968(II), p. 475) — Social advantage — National legislation under which the grant of child-raising allowance (Erziehungsgeld) to persons who do not have their residence or habitual place of stay in national territory is conditional on exceeding the minor employment threshold (Geringfügigkeitsgrenze) of 15 hours a week

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community does not preclude the exclusion, by the national legislation of a Member State, of a national of another Member State who resides in that State and is in minor employment (between 3 and 14 hours a week) in the former State from receiving a social advantage with the characteristics of German child-raising allowance on the ground that he does not have his permanent or ordinary residence in the former State.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 6.8.2005.

1

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8353 

To require the Election Assistance Commission to develop voluntary guidelines 

for the administration of elections that address the use and risks of 

artificial intelligence technologies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2024 

Ms. HOULAHAN (for herself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. LAMBORN, Ms. 

SPANBERGER, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. LIEU, and Ms. SLOTKIN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To require the Election Assistance Commission to develop 

voluntary guidelines for the administration of elections 

that address the use and risks of artificial intelligence 

technologies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preparing Election Ad5 ministrators for AI Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8353 IH

1 SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF 

2 ELECTIONS THAT ADDRESS THE USE AND 

3 RISKS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECH4 NOLOGIES. 

5 (a) REPORT AND VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES.—Not 

6 later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this 

7 Act, the Election Assistance Commission shall, in con8 sultation with the National Institute of Standards and 

9 Technology, submit to Congress, issue to State and local 

10 election offices, and make available to the public a report 

11 with voluntary guidelines for election offices that address 

12 the use and risks of artificial intelligence technologies in 

13 the administration of elections. 

14 (b) CONTENTS.—The report submitted and made 

15 available pursuant to subsection (a) shall include vol16 untary guidelines that address— 

17 (1) the risks and benefits associated with using 

18 artificial intelligence technologies to conduct election 

19 administration activities; 

20 (2) the cybersecurity risks of artificial intel21 ligence technologies to election administration; 

22 (3) how information generated and distributed 

23 by artificial intelligence technologies can affect the 

24 sharing of accurate election information and how 

25 election offices should respond; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8353 IH

1 (4) how information generated and distributed 

2 by artificial intelligence technologies can affect the 

3 spreading of election disinformation that undermines 

4 public trust and confidence in elections. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2007269EN.01006201.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/62

---

Action brought on 7 September 2007 — FMC Chemical and Others v Commission

(Case T-349/07)

(2007/C 269/112)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: FMC Chemical SPRL (Brussels, Belgium), Satec Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Elmshorn, Germany), Belchim Crop Protection NV (Londerzeel, Belgium), FMC Foret SA (Sant Cugat del Valles, Spain), F&N Agro Slovensko s.r.o. (Bratislava, Slovakia), F&N Agro Ceská republika s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic), F&N Agro Polska sp. z.o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) and FMC Corp. (Philadelphia, United States of America) (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Order the annulment of Decision 2007/415/EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the annulment of Decision 2007/415/EC;

| — | declare the illegality and inapplicability vis-à-vis the first applicants and the review of its carbosulfan dossier of Article 20 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the illegality and inapplicability vis-à-vis the first applicants and the review of its carbosulfan dossier of Article 20 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002;

vis-à-vis

| — | order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicants are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-326/07 Cheminova and Others v Commission.

Cheminova and Others

Commission

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AK-910-1310PP-ARAC]


Notice of Public Meeting, Alaska Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Alaska 
Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 16-17, 2007, at the BLM Campbell 
Creek Science Center, 6881 Abbott Loop in Anchorage, Alaska. The 
meeting begins at 8 a.m. on both days.
    The council will accept public comment on May 16 at 4 p.m. Before 
including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal 
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your 
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be 
made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your 
comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public 
review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Danielle Allen, Alaska State Office, 
222 W. 7th Avenue <greek-i>13, Anchorage, AK 99513. Telephone (907) 
271-3335 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#480c2926212d24242d170924242d26082923662a2425662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88cce9e6e1ede4e4edd7c9e4e4ede6c8e9e3a6eae4e5a6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in Alaska. At this meeting, topics planned for discussion include:
    <bullet> Alaska Minerals Program Update.
    <bullet> Fire Season/Cabin Protection Policy.
    <bullet> Invasive Species.
    <bullet> Resource Management Planning.
    <bullet> Conveyances Update.
    <bullet> Other topics the Council may raise.
    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have 
time allotted for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
people wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, 
transportation, or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the 
BLM.

Gust Panos,
Acting State Director.
 [FR Doc. E7-6930 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

Appendix A: Commen ts and Responses June 20, 2011

A-1 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices for
Proposed Amendments to Rule 4354 

## APPENDIX A

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT COMMENTS AND DISTRICT

RESPONSES FOR THE JANUAR Y 13, 2011 VERSION OF RULE 4354 (GLASS MELTING FURNACES)

June 20, 2011SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

Appendix A: Commen ts and Responses June 20, 2011

A-2 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices for
Proposed Amendments to Rule 4354 This page intentionally blank.SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

Appendix A: Commen ts and Responses June 20, 2011

A-3 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices for
Proposed Amendments to Rule 4354 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT COMMENTS AND DISTRICT RESPONSES TO
DRAFT RULE 4354 DATED JANUARY 13, 2011

EPA Region IX Staff Comments:

No comments were received.

California Air Resources Bo ard (ARB) Staff Comments

1. COMMENT: Dry Standard Cubic Foot or Feet (Dscf) is defined as a volume of gas at standard conditions without wate r, although “Standard condition without

water” was not defined and no reference was made to any rule where it was defined. Without defining “Standard Condition without Water”, certain parts of

this rule will be difficult to enfor ce. To improve stringency and ensure enforceability, we recommend defining the term “Standard C onditions Without water” or reference to any rule where it is defined.

RESPONSE: District staff has modified the defin ition to state that it is the dry gas volume corrected to standard conditi ons. This language was taken from EPA test methods. See rule for revised language.

Stakeholders submitting comments:

PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG)

2. COMMENT: PPG supports the proposed revisi ons and appreciates the District’s

efforts to structure the st art-up provisions of Rule 4354 in a manner that will accommodate both air-fired and oxy-fuel fired glass melting furnaces.

RESPONSE: District staff thanks co mmentor for their support.

3. COMMENT: We suggest very minor wording c hanges to the definition of oxidant

and to Section 5.5.5.

RESPONSE: The changes have been incorporat ed. See Proposed Rule 4354.SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

Appendix A: Commen ts and Responses June 20, 2011

A-4 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices for
Proposed Amendments to Rule 4354 This page intentionally blank.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128001 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128001 

 COA: 256229 

Oakland CC: 97-157047-FC 

DE’ANGELO DOMON HENDERSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2004 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk