alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007235EN.01000202.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-501/04) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Direct insurance other than life assurance and direct life assurance - Directives 92/49/EEC and 2002/83/EC - Portfolio transfer system - Right to cancel - Admissibility)

(2007/C 235/03)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Traversa and R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J.M Rodríguez Cárcamo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to fulfil obligations resulting from Article 12(6) of Council Directive 92/49/EEC of 18 June 1992 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and amending Directives 73/239/EEC and 88/357/EEC (third non-life insurance Directive) (OJ 1992 L 228, p. 1) and Article 14(5) of Directive 2002/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 concerning life assurance (OJ 2002 L 345, p. 1) — National legislation which is discriminatory towards insurers in other Member States

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 22.1.2005.

1

---
# C_2007183EN.01000401.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-173/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Articles 23 EC, 25 EC and 133 EC - EEC-Algeria Cooperation Agreement - Environmental protection tax on gas pipelines installed in the Sicilian Region - Charge having equivalent effect to a customs duty)

(2007/C 183/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Traversa and J. Hottiaux, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia, Agent, and A. Cingolo, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 23 EC, 25 EC, 26 EC and 133 EC and of Articles 4 and 9 of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria signed on 26 April 1976 and approved by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2210/78 of 26 September 1978 (OJ 1978 L 263, p. 1) — National law imposing an environmental protection tax (‘tributo ambientale’) on gas pipelines installed in the Sicilian Region

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by introducing an environmental tax on methane gas from Algeria, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 23 EC, 25 EC and 133 EC and under Article 9 of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, signed in Algiers on 26 April 1976, and approved on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2210/78 of 26 September 1978; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by introducing an environmental tax on methane gas from Algeria, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 23 EC, 25 EC and 133 EC and under Article 9 of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, signed in Algiers on 26 April 1976, and approved on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2210/78 of 26 September 1978;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.6.2005.

1

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9169 

To amend section 7 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to permit 

State agencies to restrict the use of supplemental nutrition assistance 

program benefits to prevent the purchase of soft drinks, candy, ice 

cream, and prepared desserts (such as cakes, pies, cookies, and similar 

products). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2024 

Mr. ROSENDALE (for himself, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. BRECHEEN, and Mr. HARRIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend section 7 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

to permit State agencies to restrict the use of supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits to prevent 

the purchase of soft drinks, candy, ice cream, and prepared desserts (such as cakes, pies, cookies, and similar 

products). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Health in 

5 SNAP Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9169 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

2 Section 7 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 

3 U.S.C. 2016) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(l) STATE OPTION TO RESTRICT PURCHASE OF

6 CERTAIN ITEMS.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

8 provision of this Act, a State agency may, at its dis9 cretion, ban the use of supplemental nutrition assist10 ance program benefits for the purchase of soft 

11 drinks, candy, ice cream, prepared desserts such as 

12 cakes, pies, cookies, and similar products, as des13 ignated by the Secretary. 

14 ‘‘(2) DESIGNATION BY THE SECRETARY.—The 

15 Secretary shall issue and update as necessary a list 

16 of specific items that fall under the categories de17 scribed in paragraph (1). 

18 ‘‘(3) NO APPROVAL REQUIRED.—The implemen19 tation of any restrictions under paragraph (1) shall 

20 be at the sole discretion of the State agency and 

21 shall not require approval from the Secretary. 

22 ‘‘(4) NO REPORTING REQUIRED.—State agen23 cies that exercise the option established by this sub24 section shall not be required to submit reports re25 garding the implementation or results of such reVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:02 Aug 23, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H9169.IH H9169

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9169 IH

1 strictions outside the normal reporting requirements 

2 of the program.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2007247EN.01002902.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/29

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2007 — Prym and Prym Consumer v Commission

(Case T-30/05) (1)

1

(Competition - Cartels - European haberdashery market (needles) - Product market sharing - Geographic market sharing - Fine - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Duty to state reasons - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Leniency notice)

(2007/C 247/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: William Prym GmbH & Co. KG (Stolberg, Germany) and Prym Consumer GmbH & Co. KG (Stolberg) (represented by: H. Meyer-Lindemann, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and K. Mojzesowicz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 4221 final of 26 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F-1/38.338 — PO/Needles) in so far as it relates to the applicants, and, in the alternative, for annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on William Prym GmbH & Co. KG and Prym Consumer GmbH & Co. KG under Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2004) 4221 final of 26 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F-1/38.338 — PO/Needles) at EUR 27 million; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on William Prym GmbH & Co. KG and Prym Consumer GmbH & Co. KG under Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2004) 4221 final of 26 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F-1/38.338 — PO/Needles) at EUR 27 million;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders William Prym and Prym Consumer to bear 90 % of their own costs and to pay 90 % of the costs incurred by the Commission, and the Commission to bear 10 % of its own costs and to pay 10 % of the costs incurred by William Prym and Prym Consumer. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders William Prym and Prym Consumer to bear 90 % of their own costs and to pay 90 % of the costs incurred by the Commission, and the Commission to bear 10 % of its own costs and to pay 10 % of the costs incurred by William Prym and Prym Consumer.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.4.2005.

1

---
#### March 19, 1962

Reap. Dec. 10212.

On January 17,1962 (Reap. Dec. 10143), plaintiff’s rehearing motion was granted in Standard Oil Co. of California *v.*United States, reported as reappraisement R58/26635. Entered at Los Angeles, Oalif. (Not published.)

¿Motion having been made by the attorneys for the plaintiff and there being no objection by the Government, it is

Hereby Ordered and Decreed that court No. R59/1879 be substituted in place of R58/26635.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# America the beautiful: Utah

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  America the beautiful: Utah 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Sheep on managed mountain range, Wasatch soil conservation district 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Agriculture 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1960-1970 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  Utah 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  150 × 60 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  A57.8-2.Ut1.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 51125.

#### Petition 6414-R of Bullock’s, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the testimony produced at the hearing and the admissions of Government counsel it was held that there was no intent to defraud or to deceive the Government or its officials. The petition was therefore granted.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1067

_____________________________

LONNIE B RAMEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Timothy Register, Judge.

April 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Dixon, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Lonnie B. Ramey, 

pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
(Reap. Dec. 8348)

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 1996-E, etc.

(Decided October 21, 1954)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows concerning the merchandise referred to below:

> 1) The merchandise covered by these appeals consists of firebrick imported from Canada and invoiced with descriptions the same as those set forth in paragraph 2 below.

> *5342) At the time of exportation neither foreign value, an export value, nor a United States value existed for such or similar merchandise, and the cost of production for imported merchandise, in Canadian dollars per 1,000 pieces, was as given below less 10 percent:

> Jan. 1, 1943, to Nov. 18, 1946 Nov. 19, 1946, to Aug. 14, 1947 Aug. 15, 1947, to Feb. 29, 1948 Mar. 1, 1948, to Dec. 31, 1948

> _ 61.00 Straights or squares_ 70. 00 80. 00 85. 00

> Side arch, end wedge, necks, soaps, jambs, keys, feather edge, splits 1K, *1%,*and 2"_ 61. 00 70. 00 80. 00 85. 00

> Tongue and groove, groove only_ 63. 50 72. 50 82. 50 87. 50

> Splits J4, %, and 1"_ 64. 00 73. 00 83. 00 88. 00

> Circles and skews_ 70. 00 79. 00 89. 00 94. 00

> Large straights, large end wedge, “E” blocks, flatbaeks_ 105. 00 115. 00 127. 50 _ 91.50

> 3) The appeals are abandoned as to all merchandise except that invoiced under the descriptions given in paragraph 2 and upon this stipulation the appeals enumerated in attached schedule may be deemed to be submitted.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise described below, and that such values, for the merchandise exported during the periods specified, were as follows:

> Canadian dollars per 1,000 pieces

> Jan. 1, 1943, to Nov. 18, 1946 Nov. 19, 1946, to Aug. 14, 1947 Aug. 15, 1947, to Feb. 29, 1948 Mar. 1, 1948, to Dec. 31, 1948

> Straights or squares_ 61. 00 70. 00 80. 00 85. 00

> Side arch, end wedge, necks, soaps, jambs, keys, feather edge, splits IK, 1% and 2"_ 61. 00 70. 00 80. 00 85. 00

> Tongue and groove, groove only_ 63. 50 72. 50 82. 50 87. 50

> Splits K, *%*and 1"_ 64. 00 73. 00 83. 00 88. 00

> Circles and skews_ 70. 00 79. 00 89. 00 94. 00

> Large straights, large end wedge, “E” blocks, flatbaeks_ 91. 50 105. 00 115. 00 127. 50

> All less 10 per centum

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.
No. 56086.

protest 109926-K (San Francisco).

#### A. Giurlani & Bro. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2007247EN.01003001.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/30

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2007 — Coats Holdings and Coats v Commission

(Case T-36/05) (1)

1

(Competition - Cartels - European haberdashery market (needles) - Product market sharing - Geographic market sharing - Assessment of evidence - Participation in meetings - Tripartite agreement - Fine - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Attenuating circumstances)

(2007/C 247/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Coats Holdings Ltd (Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom) and J & P Coats Ltd (Uxbridge) (represented by: W. Sibree and C. Jeffs, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and K. Mojzesowicz, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 4221 final of 26 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F-1/38.338 — PO/Needles) and, in the alternative, for annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2004) 4221 final of 26 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F-1/38.338 — PO/Needles) in so far as the Decision finds that the applicants infringed Article 81(1) EC after 13 March 1997; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2004) 4221 final of 26 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F-1/38.338 — PO/Needles) in so far as the Decision finds that the applicants infringed Article 81(1) EC after 13 March 1997;

| 2. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants under Article 2 of the Decision at EUR 20 million; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants under Article 2 of the Decision at EUR 20 million;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 4. | Orders the applicants to bear two thirds of their own costs and to pay two thirds of the costs incurred by the Commission, and the Commission to bear one third of its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the applicants to bear two thirds of their own costs and to pay two thirds of the costs incurred by the Commission, and the Commission to bear one third of its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the applicants.

Orders the applicants to bear two thirds of their own costs and to pay two thirds of the costs incurred by the Commission, and the Commission to bear one third of its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by the applicants

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

MARK EDWARD HURST, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 2:11-cv-1090 

 JUDGE SMITH 

 Magistrate Judge King 

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION 

AND CORRECTION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 ORDER 

On October 3, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay the Court’s ruling on Plaintiff’s 

Objections to the August 7, 2014 Report and Recommendation be denied. The parties were 

specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the 

consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report 

and Recommendation. 

 The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s 

Motion to Stay (Doc. 117) is DENIED. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:11-cv-01090-GCS-NMK Doc #: 124 Filed: 11/12/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007262EN.01000802.xml

| 1.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4873 — Schott Solar/Wacker/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 262/06)

On 2 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4873. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4873. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---