alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rion B. Needs, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Reid E. Simpson, Senior Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Rion B. NeedsRion B. NeedsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 2, 2010/s/ Reid E. SimpsonReid E. SimpsonSenior Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 2, 2010
- FPL_1559-Aocr-1
- FPL_1559-Aocr-2
- FPL_1559-Aocr-3
- FPL_1559-Aocr-4
- FPL_1559-Aocr-5
- FPL_1559-Aocr-6
- FPL_1559-Aocr-7
- FPL_1559-Aocr-8
- FPL_1559-Aocr-9
- FPL_1559-Aocr-10
- FPL_1559-Aocr-11
- FPL_1559-Aocr-12
- FPL_1559-Aocr-13
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00264

- CR

G LADYS M

ARIA G RAHAM

- O’D ELL

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Criminal Court

No. 1

of Tarrant County ( 1778480 )

November 2, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be d ism issed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
# C_2007183EN.01000601.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 June 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-358/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/54/EC - Internal market in electricity - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2007/C 183/09)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Schima and S. Pardo Quintillán, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendants: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, Agent)

Defendants:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC — Statements made with regard to decommissioning and waste management activities (OJ 2003 L 176, p. 37)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulation and administrative provisions to comply with Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulation and administrative provisions to comply with Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gustavo Javier Lopez, Chief Administrative Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(i)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

October 30, 2015
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10041

USDC No. 3:95-CV-950-H

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CESAR OMAR MARTINEZ,

a/k/a Jose Sanchez,

a/k/a La Cotorra,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

January 15, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cesar Martinez (federal inmate #23582-077) has applied to

this court for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the

district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. 

Martinez contends that he is entitled to relief on grounds (1) of

incorrect applications of the Sentencing Guidelines, and (2) that

his guilty plea was induced by his counsel’s false promise and
No. 96-10041

- 2 -

incorrect advice concerning the sentence he would receive. 

IT IS ORDERED that leave to appeal IFP is DENIED, because

Martinez’s appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED

that the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

If this court were to hold that a certificate of

appealability (COA) is required in a case such as this, COA would

be denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
# C_2007183EN.01000701.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 June 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-422/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/30/EC - Air transport - Noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports - Adoption by a Member State of a measure liable seriously to compromise the result prescribed by the directive during the transposition period)

(2007/C 183/11)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Benyon and M. Huttunen, Agents, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: M. Wimmer and A. Hubert, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of the second paragraph of Article 10 EC and the third paragraph of Article 249 EC — Measures taken by a Member State during the period laid down for implementation of Directive 2002/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 March 2002 on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports (OJ 2002 L 85, p. 40) which are liable seriously to compromise the result prescribed by the Directive — National legislation limiting night flights of certain types of civil subsonic jet aircraft

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting the Royal Decree of 14 April 2002 regulating night flights of certain types of civil subsonic jet aeroplanes, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2002/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 March 2002 on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports and under the second paragraph of Article 10 EC, read in conjunction with the third paragraph of Article 249 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting the Royal Decree of 14 April 2002 regulating night flights of certain types of civil subsonic jet aeroplanes, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2002/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 March 2002 on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports and under the second paragraph of Article 10 EC, read in conjunction with the third paragraph of Article 249 EC;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.

1

---
# C_2007183EN.01003101.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/31

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 June 2007 — Tirrenia di Navigazione and Others v Commission

(Case T-246/99) (1)

1

(State Aid - Maritime transport - Decision to initiate the procedure under Article 88(2) EC - New State aid - Existing State aid)

(2007/C 183/60)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Tirrenia di Navigazione SpA, formerly Tirrenia di Navigazione SpA and Adriatica di Navigazione SpA (Naples, Italy); Caremar SpA (Naples); Toremar SpA (Leghorn, Italy); Siremar SpA (Palermo, Italy); and Saremar SpA (Cagliari, Italy) (represented by: initially A. Tizzano and G. Roberti and subsequently G. Roberti, A. Franchi and G. Bellitti, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, V. Di Bucci and E. De Persio, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Navigazione Libera del Golfo SpA (Naples) (represented by: S. Ravenna and A. Abate, lawyers); Aliscafi Società Navigazione Alta Velocità SpA (Aliscafi SNAV) (Messina, Italy) (represented by: B. Castaldo and C. Forte, lawyers); Traghetti Pozzuoli Srl (Naples); Alilauro SpA (Naples); and Linee Lauro Srl (Pozzuoli, Italy) (represented by: E. Amato, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission's decision of 6 August 1999 to initiate the procedure under Article 88(2) EC concerning the State aid granted by the Italian Republic to undertakings in the Tirrenia di Navigazione group (OJ 1999 C 306, p. 2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicants to bear their own costs and to pay those of the Commission and the interveners Navigazione Libera del Golfo SpA, Linee Lauro Srl, Traghetti Pozzuoli Srl and Alilauro SpA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicants to bear their own costs and to pay those of the Commission and the interveners Navigazione Libera del Golfo SpA, Linee Lauro Srl, Traghetti Pozzuoli Srl and Alilauro SpA;

| 3. | Orders the intervener Aliscafi Società Navigazione Alta Velocità SpA (Aliscafi SNAV) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener Aliscafi Società Navigazione Alta Velocità SpA (Aliscafi SNAV) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 22.1.2000.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION of CFO PURSUANT TO  Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the "Report") of FS Energy and Power Fund
(the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edward T. Gallivan, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that:





Dated: March 7, 2018/s/ EDWARD T. GALLIVAN, JR. Edward T. Gallivan, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Case: 2:11-cv-01139-EAS-NMK Doc #: 29 Filed: 12/02/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cv-01139-EAS-NMK Doc #: 29 Filed: 12/02/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
----

----

| Tel-Aviv, Israel  March 17, 2014    | /s/ Kesselman & KesselmanCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)A member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Kesselman & Kesselman, Trade Tower, 25 Hamered Street, Tel-Aviv 68125, Israel, P.O Box 452 Tel-Aviv 61003  Telephone: +972 -3- 7954555, Fax:+972 -3- 7954556, www.pwc.co.il |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        Kesselman & Kesselman is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member firm of which is a separate legal entity                |

----

----
# C_2007304EN.01000302.xml

| 15.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4953 — Sony Ericsson/Motorola/UIQ)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 304/05)

On 11 December 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4953. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4953. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-80,939-01, WR-80,939-02, WR-80,939-03

EX PARTE ERIC REED MARASCIO, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W380-80601-09-HC, W380-80602-09-HC, W380-80603-09-HC

IN THE 380 DISTRICT COURT OF COLLIN COUNTY

TH

YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion in which KEASLER, J., joined.

CONCURRING OPINION

It is my understanding that one of the reasons we filed and set this post-conviction

application for writ of habeas corpus was to address the latent tension between Gonzalez v.

State, 8 S.W.3d 640 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000), and Ex parte Townsend, 137 S.W.3d 79 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2004)—especially in light of last year’s opinion in Ex parte Moss, 446 S.W.3d

786 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Today, Judge Richardson would have the Court resolve that

tension by simply deferring to Gonzalez’s categorization of a double jeopardy claim as

“fundamental.” Concurring Opinion at 7, 9. But Judge Richardson does not go on to explain

what he means by “fundamental,” much less why Gonzalez’s characterization of double
Marascio — 2

jeopardy rights as “fundamental” should suffice to trump the rule of forfeiture announced in

Townsend—that an issue that was available to be raised on direct appeal, but was not, may

not be broached for the first time in post-conviction habeas corpus proceedings, since habeas

proceedings are not a substitute for direct appeal.

We have subsequently provided a basis for reconciliation, in Moss. There we held that

the Townsend rule of forfeiture is a qualified one, and it does not apply to claims that would

fit within the first category of Marin v. State, 851 S.W.2d 275, 279 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993),

embracing absolute requirements or prohibitions. Such category one Marin claims are

“essentially independent of the litigants’ wishes . . . and cannot, therefore, be waived or

forfeited by the parties.” Moss, 446 S.W.3d at 788 (quoting Marin, 851 S.W.2d at 279). It

seems to me that, after Moss, the question whether Townsend applies to foreclose raising a

double jeopardy claim for the first time in a post-conviction habeas corpus application

depends upon whether such a claim is, by its nature, a category one Marin claim. That is the

question the Court should be asking itself today. To simply announce to the bench and bar

that Gonzalez controls because it labeled a double jeopardy claim “fundamental”—without

any explanation of what that means and without any analysis of where such a claim might

fit within the Marin categories—begsthe question entirely. After Moss, we do not adequately

resolve the tension between Gonzalez and Townsend by simply anointing one over the other.

Because Judge Keasler addresses all the right questions, and because I agree with his

answers, I join his concurring opinion.
Marascio — 3

FILED:

PUBLISH
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of InterXion Holding N.V. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies to the undersigneds knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ David C. Ruberg

David C. Ruberg

Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 30, 2018
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Xueda Education Group (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Xin Jin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(a)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: April 3, 2013

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Xin Jin                      |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Xin Jin                    |   |
|   | Title: Chief   Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Pathway to fishing: Map courtesy of: Lakemaps, Inc, PO Box 80087, Minneapolis, MN 55408

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Pathway to fishing: Map courtesy of: Lakemaps, Inc, PO Box 80087, Minneapolis, MN 55408 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Map courtesy of: Lakemaps, Inc, PO Box 80087, Minneapolis, MN 55408 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Sketched map showing depth of lake by isolines, rough scale included. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  Minnesota 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  195 × 68 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  028281362.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -