alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Little scraps can add up to a whale of a lot!

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Little scraps can add up to a whale of a lot! 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 88-515-P. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 43 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/   Roy T. K. Thung
Chief Executive Officer
November 9, 2006   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                       906
<INVENTORY>                                     12,097
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,957
<PP&E>                                          19,209
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,178
<BONDS>                                          9,582
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,576
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,049
<SALES>                                         30,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,508
<CGS>                                           26,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,663
<INCOME-TAX>                                       578
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,085
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,085
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17545-17546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-375-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
May 1, 2007:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 203.
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 211.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the

[[Page 17546]]

appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. 
Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the 
provisions of Sec.  154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 
154.210). Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve 
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99dfdccbdad6f7f5f0f7fccaece9e9f6ebedd9fffcebfab7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-6571 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2007206EN.01001001.xml

| 5.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 September 2007

(2007/C 206/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,358 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4487 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6752 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,389 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6466 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,4 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,929 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,645 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,67 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6971 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8243 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3042 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,764 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,776 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6466 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4305 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5866 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9415 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0762 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 275,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8713 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2525 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,321 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 771,99 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7652 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,351 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,898 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,101 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,358

JPY

Japanese yen

156,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4487

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6752

SEK

Swedish krona

9,389

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6466

ISK

Iceland króna

88,4

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,929

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,645

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,67

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6971

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8243

RON

Romanian leu

3,3042

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,764

TRY

Turkish lira

1,776

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6466

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4305

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5866

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9415

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0762

KRW

South Korean won

1 275,64

ZAR

South African rand

9,8713

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2525

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,321

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 771,99

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7652

PHP

Philippine peso

63,351

RUB

Russian rouble

34,898

THB

Thai baht

44,101

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

OTTO BERK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 2:10-CV-1082

Judge Frost

Magistrate Judge King

ERNIE MOORE, DIRECTOR, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

On May 16, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended

that Defendants’ motion to dismiss for misjoinder be denied and that

Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment be denied. Report and

Recommendation, Doc. No. 46. This matter is now before the Court on

the objection filed by Plaintiffs Berk, Blair and Hall. Motion for a

De Novo Review, Doc. No. 49. Defendants have not filed objections,

although all parties were advised of their right to do so and of the

consequences of their failure to file objections.

The Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiffs’ motion for

default judgment be denied, observing that the Court had stayed the

date by which Defendants were to respond to the complaint, pending

resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss for misjoinder. Report

and Recommendation, at 3 (citing Order, Doc. No. 37). In their

objection, Plaintiffs appear to disagree with the Court’s stay of

response date, arguing that Defendants should have responded to the

complaint and that their failure to do so, combined with the filing of

Case: 2:10-cv-01082-GLF-NMK Doc #: 54 Filed: 06/08/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
the motion to dismiss for misjoinder, worked to Plaintiffs’ prejudice.

The decision of the Magistrate Judge to grant Defendants’ request

to stay their answer date was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary

to law. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Defendants’

failure to respond to the complaint was therefore authorized by the

Court. Under these circumstances, it cannot be said that Defendants

were in default. Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment is without

merit.

Plaintiffs’ Motion for a De Novo Review, Doc. No. 49, is

therefore DENIED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and

AFFIRMED. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder, Doc. No. 24,

is DENIED. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment, Doc. No. 28, is

DENIED. 

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

 GREGORY L. FROST

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case: 2:10-cv-01082-GLF-NMK Doc #: 54 Filed: 06/08/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

 CASE NO. C2-11-741

UNITED STEEL, PAPER JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH P. DEAVERS

MANUFACTURING, ENERGY,

ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE 

WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al.,

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed August 21, 2012, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered in favor of the Plaintiff. This case is DISMISSED.

Date: August 21, 2012 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00741-EAS-EPD Doc #: 22 Filed: 08/21/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007283EN.01001901.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/19

---

Action brought on 13 September 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-422/07)

(2007/C 283/34)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and D. Recchia, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

| — | Declare that, by not adopting the necessary measures for verification of compliance with good laboratory practice in relation to inspections and study checks in the industrial chemical substances sector, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of Directive 2004/10/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on the harmonisation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of the principles of good laboratory practice and the verification of their applications for tests on chemical substances |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by not adopting the necessary measures for verification of compliance with good laboratory practice in relation to inspections and study checks in the industrial chemical substances sector, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of Directive 2004/10/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on the harmonisation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of the principles of good laboratory practice and the verification of their applications for tests on chemical substances

1

| — | Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission has no evidence that the necessary measures have been adopted in Spain for study checks in accordance with principles of good laboratory practice on the part of the laboratories carrying out tests on industrial chemicals. Neither has any authority been designated in Spain as responsible for the verification of the compliance with the principles of good laboratory practice on the part of those aforementioned laboratories or, in any case, the name of that authority has not been communicated to the Commission.

Consequently it can be stated that the Kingdom of Spain has proceeded without adopting the necessary measures for the verification of compliance of good laboratory practice relating to inspections and study checks in the industrial chemical products sector as intended in Article 3 of the Directive.

---

(1)  OJ L 50, 20.2.2004, p. 44.

1

---
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May      10, 2010 | By:                | /s/ Tianfu Yang |
|------------------------------|------------------------------|----------------------|
|                         | Tianfu      Yang             |
|                         | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                         |                         |
| Date: May      10, 2010 | By:                | /s/ Zedong Xu   |
|                         | Zedong      Xu               |
|                         | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

LINDA BROWN,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

CASE NO. C2-11-044

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

COMMISSIONER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE E.A. PRESTON DEAVERS

SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or

trial.

Pursuant to the ORDER filed March 20, 2012, JUDGMENT is hereby entered in

favor of the Defendant. This case is DISMISSED.

Date: March 20, 2012 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00044-EAS-EPD Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/20/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 12

                           TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY

                     RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



     The  following  table  sets  forth  the company's ratio of earnings to

fixed charges for the periods indicated.


  Nine Months   Twelve Months
     Ended          Ended                 Year Ended December 31,         
Sept. 30, 1998  Sept. 30, 1998     1997  1996(2)  1995(2)  1994(2)  1993(2)

    4.86x (1)       4.43x (1)     4.38x  4.40x    4.28x    3.88x(3) 3.81x(4)


     For  the  purposes  of  calculating  these ratios, earnings consist of
income  before  income  taxes  and  fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of
interest  on  indebtedness,  amortization  of  debt  premium,  the interest
component of rentals and preferred stock dividend requirements.
                                                                       

(1)  Includes  the  effect  of a $9.6-million pretax charge associated with
     Tampa Electric's efforts to mitigate the effects of a 1997 FPSC ruling
     on certain wholesale power supply contracts. The effect of this charge
     was  to reduce the ratio of earnings to fixed charges. Had this charge
     been  excluded  from  the  calculation, the ratio of earnings to fixed
     charges  would  have  been  5.05x and 4.57x for the nine- and 12-month
     periods ended Sept. 30, 1998, respectively.

(2)  Amounts  have  been  restated  to  reflect  the  merger of Peoples Gas
     System, Inc., with and into Tampa Electric Company.

(3)  Includes  the  effect  of a $21.3-million pretax restructuring charge.
     The effect of this charge was to reduce the ratio of earnings to fixed
     charges.   Had  this  non-recurring  charge  been  excluded  from  the
     calculation,  the  ratio  of earnings to fixed charges would have been
     4.23x for the year ended Dec. 31, 1994.

(4)  Includes  the  effect  of  the non-recurring $10-million pretax charge
     associated  with  a coal pricing settlement. The effect of this charge
     was  to  reduce  the ratio of earnings to fixed charges. Had this non-
     recurring  charge  been  excluded  from  the calculation, the ratio of
     earnings  to  fixed  charges  would have been 3.97x for the year ended
     Dec. 31, 1993.








                                     73<PAGE>