alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9238)

#### Leading Forwarders, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 960079, etc.

(Decided September 11, 1958)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*565WilsoN, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise, consisting of cashmere outerwear, manufactured by firms shown in Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, involved in the reappraisement appeals listed in said Schedule *“A”*is such or similar, and the issues are in all material respects the same as the merchandise and issues in *Charles Stockheimer, et al.*v. *United States, etc.,*44 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 92, C. A. D. 642, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

> That there was no foreign value, export value, or United States value, as defined in Section 402 (e), (d), and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the involved merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

> That the cost of production, as defined in Section 402 (f) of said Act, is the proper basis for appraisement of the involved merchandise, and that such cost of production for each of the item numbers or other description shown on the invoices involved in each of the appeals listed in said Schedule “A” is as stated in said Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part of this stipulation, for the merchandise exported during the specified periods.

> That the appeals are abandoned as to all merchandise on the invoices involved in said Schedule “A” for which no value is shown in Schedule “A”.

> That the appeals listed in said Schedule “A” are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of each of the item numbers or other description shown on the invoices involved in each of the appeals listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, and that such values for merchandise exported during the specified periods, were as shown in said schedule “A.”

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all merchandise for which no value is shown in schedule *“A,”*to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

*566
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Water safety

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Water safety 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. American Forces Information Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 94-0220-P. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; 78; Defense billboard (1988) ; # 78. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Donna H. Kelley, Chief Financial Officer of Bainbridge Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bainbridge Bancshares, Inc. forthe quarter ended September 30, 2004; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 15, 2004
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135002 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135002 COA: 279315 Kent CC: 06-004052-FH CARL MICHAEL SCOTT-PARKIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 16, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
#### James I. Murray, *Respondent, v.*Luther Roper, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, referee discharged, costs to abide event. Opinion by Bockes, J.
# C_2007170EN.01002601.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/26

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2007 — Wauthier and Deveen v Commission

(Case T-164/04) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Reports procedure - Career development review - 2001/2002 Appraisal exercise - Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly devoid of any legal basis)

(2007/C 170/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Patricia Wauthier (Tubize, Belgium) and Viviane Deveen (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, and subsequently by F. Frabetti alone)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment, principally, of the 2001/2002 appraisal exercise in relation to the applicants; and, alternatively, of the applicants' career development reviews for that exercise.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and, for the rest, as manifestly devoid of any legal basis. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and, for the rest, as manifestly devoid of any legal basis.

| 2. | The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 24.7.2004.

1

---
No. 46840.

#### Protests 17057-K, etc., of Ciba Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that only 29 percent of the Silvatol I consists of merchandise subject to tax. In accordance therewith it was held that 2;Koo of the Silvatol I in question is subject to tax at 3 cents per pound as claimed.
No. 49797.

#### Protests 629764-G, etc., of Harry Solodow et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items consist of hats known as harvest hats, similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) and that they are valued at less than $3 per dozen. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as to these items.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9176 

To amend the Small Business Act to increase the maximum loan amount 

for a loan made under section 7(a) of such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2024 

Mr. THANEDAR (for himself, Mr. ALFORD, and Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small 

Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to increase the maximum 

loan amount for a loan made under section 7(a) of 

such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Loans In Our Neigh5 borhoods Act of 2024’’ or the ‘‘LIONs Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAXIMUM LOAN AMOUNT FOR A 7(a) LOAN. 

7 Section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Small Business Act (15 

8 U.S.C. 636(a)(3)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘$3,750,000 

9 (or if the gross loan amount would exceed $5,000,000)’’ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9176 IH

1 and inserting ‘‘$7,500,000 (or if the gross loan amount 

2 would exceed $10,000,000)’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 53673.

protest 117883-K (New York).

#### The Otto Gerdau Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were nothin fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as “manifested, not found,” is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.
# C_2007155EN.01000101.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/1

---

(2007/C 155/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 140, 23.6.2007

OJ C 140, 23.6.2007

Past publications

OJ C 129, 9.6.2007

OJ C 117, 26.5.2007

OJ C 96, 28.4.2007

OJ C 95, 28.4.2007

OJ C 82, 14.4.2007

OJ C 69, 24.3.2007

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Bee smart! don't bug bees! honey bees are your friends, we make honey and beeswax and pollinate many fruits and vegetables.

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Bee smart! don't bug bees! honey bees are your friends, we make honey and beeswax and pollinate many fruits and vegetables. 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 91-500-P. "Issued May 1991." 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 56 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 43022.

#### Protests 993023-G, etc., of Bohemian Distributing Co. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
M**AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JUDGMENT IN CIVIL CASE 

WILLIE LESTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-CV-0048

Judge Marbley

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have

been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the

February 27, 2012 Order, the Court ADOPTED AND

AFFIRMED the Report and Recommendation. The decision of

the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. This

action is DISMISSED. Final Judgment entered pursuant to

Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Date: February 27, 2012 James Bonini, Clerk

 s/Betty L. Clark 

 Betty L. Clark/Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00048-ALM-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-549-821]


Notice of Extension of Deadline for the Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Retail Carrier 
Bags from Thailand

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Case or Richard Rimlinger, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3174 and (202) 482-4477, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Extension of Deadline

    At the request of various parties, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on polyethylene retail carrier bags from Thailand for the peri1od 
August 1, 2005, through July 31, 2006. See Initiation of Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 57465 (September 
29, 2006). Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act), requires the Department to issue preliminary results of 
review within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of 
an order for which a review is requested and final results within 120 
days after the date on which the preliminary results were published. If 
it is not practicable to complete the review within these time periods, 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend the 
time limit for the preliminary results to a maximum of 365 days after 
the last day of the anniversary month.
    We determine that it is not practicable to complete the preliminary 
results of this review within the current time limit because of the 
number of respondents in this review and the complexity of the issues 
under analysis. Further, we received below-cost allegations and are 
currently conducting below-cost investigations for several of the 
respondents. Accordingly, because we need to analyze and incorporate 
the information from recently filed submissions, we are extending the 
deadline for issuing the preliminary results of this review by 60 days 
until July 2, 2007.
    This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 
and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: March 30, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-6406 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1772

In re: WILLIAM SCOTT MACDONALD,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(1:09-cv-01047-GBL-TRJ)

Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Scott MacDonald, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Scott MacDonald petitions for a writ of 

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed 

granting his writ of habeas corpus. See MacDonald v. Moose, 710 

F.3d 154 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 200 (2013). He 

seeks an order from this court directing the district court to 

act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the 

district court granted the writ of habeas corpus on August 7, 

2014. Accordingly, because the district court has acted, we 

deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis and we deny MacDonald’s motions to supplement 

his petition and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED