Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Proposed Rules 49379 

early, the RDAP contract terminates and 

voucher payments to the landlord stop. 

To remain eligible for a new voucher 

after terminating tenancy, the voucher 

holder must meet the following 

requirements: 

(1) If the voucher holder terminates 

tenancy during the lease term, the 

voucher holder must document 

landlord’s consent to the termination of 

the lease. 

(2) The voucher holder must notify 

the Agency immediately upon 

terminating tenancy. 

(b) The landlord may terminate 

tenancy only in accordance with the 

provisions of the voucher holder’s lease. 

The landlord may not terminate the 

tenancy or charge a penalty to the tenant 

or Agency if the Agency fails to pay the 

housing assistance payment or pays it 

late. Lease provisions under which the 

landlord may terminate tenancy include 

the following: 

(1) Violations of the terms of lease 

that are substantial and repeated; 

(2) Violations of Federal, State, or 

local law that directly relate to the 

occupancy or use of the unit or 

premises; 

(3) Other causes specified in the lease. 

(c) The Agency may terminate 

assistance to the voucher holder if he or 

she is subject to a court ordered eviction 

or if the voucher holder relinquishes the 

voucher and no longer participates in 

the program. The Agency may also 

terminate assistance under the following 

circumstances: 

(1) If the voucher holder or voucher 

household violates any of the 

obligations under the program as 

defined in § 3560.804; 

(2) If the voucher holder or voucher 

household commits fraud, bribery, or 

other corrupt or criminal acts related to 

any Rural Development MFH program; 

(3) If the voucher holder or voucher 

household owes funds to the Agency in 

connection with the Rural Development 

Voucher Program; or 

(4) If the voucher holder or voucher 

household has engaged in or threatened 

abusive or violent behavior to Agency 

representatives. 

(d) The Agency may recapture any 

unauthorized assistance that was 

provided to a landlord or voucher 

holder. Unauthorized assistance may be 

the result of submission of inaccurate or 

false information by the landlord or 

voucher holder or an error by the 

Agency personnel. Unauthorized 

assistance will be processed in 

accordance with subpart O of this part. 

The Agency will provide notice to the 

landlord or voucher holder upon 

determining that unauthorized 

assistance was received. The notice will 

specify, in detail, the reason(s) that the 

assistance was determined to be 

unauthorized, the amount of 

unauthorized assistance to be repaid, 

and the process by which a review may 

be requested. 

(e) In making termination decisions, 

the Agency has discretion to consider 

the seriousness of the issue, the level of 

involvement of household members, 

mitigating circumstances, such as the 

disability of a household member, and 

the effects of termination on noninvolved household members. The 

Agency may permit a voucher holder to 

continue receiving assistance while 

imposing a condition that the household 

member or members who engaged in 

wrongful activity will not reside with 

the voucher holder. 

§ 3560.815 Monitoring and enforcement. 

The Agency will monitor voucher 

holders and landlords participating in 

the Rural Development Voucher 

Program. The Agency or its 

representatives, Inspector General of the 

U.S Department of Agriculture and 

Comptroller General of the United 

States have full and free access to all 

premises and to all accounts and other 

records that are relevant to the Rural 

Development Voucher Program. Upon 

request, voucher holders and landlords 

must assist in accessing any accounts or 

records. The Agency, at its discretion 

and in accordance with Agency 

regulations, may pursue civil monetary 

penalties from the landlord or voucher 

holder in an attempt to remedy 

violations of program regulations. 

§§ 3560.816–3560.849 [Reserved] 

§ 3560.850 OMB control number. 

The information collection 

requirements contained in this 

regulation has been forwarded to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for approval. Public reporting 

burden for this collection of information 

is averaged at 15 minutes response, 

including time reviewing instructions, 

searching existing data sources, 

gathering and maintaining the data 

needed, and completing and reviewing 

the collection of information. 

Dated: August 7, 2013. 

Tammye Trevin ̃ o, 

Administrator, Rural Housing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–19769 Filed 8–13–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0693; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–059–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 757–200 

and –200PF series airplanes. This 

proposed AD was prompted by reports 

indicating that a standard access door 

was located where an impact-resistant 

access door was required, and stencils 

were missing from some impactresistant access doors. This proposed 

AD would require an inspection of the 

left- and right-hand wing fuel tank 

access doors to determine that impactresistant access doors are installed in 

the correct locations, and to replace any 

door with an impact-resistant access 

door if necessary. This proposed AD 

also would require an inspection for 

stencils and index markers on impactresistant access doors, and application 

of new stencils or index markers if 

necessary. This proposed AD would 

also require revising the maintenance 

program to incorporate changes to the 

airworthiness limitations section. We 

are proposing this AD to prevent foreign 

object penetration of the fuel tank, 

which could cause a fuel leak near an 

ignition source (e.g., hot brakes or 

engine exhaust nozzle), consequently 

leading to a fuel-fed fire. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by September 30, 

2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
49380 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; 

fax 206–766–5680; Internet https:// 

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may 

review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA. For information on 

the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Suzanne Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, 

Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6438; fax: 

425–917–6590; email: 

suzanne.lucier@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposal. Send your comments to 

an address listed under the ADDRESSES

section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0693; Directorate Identifier 2013– 

NM–059–AD’’ at the beginning of your 

comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

We received reports of a standard 

access door located where an impactresistant access door is required, and 

stencils missing from some spare 

impact-resistant access doors. This 

condition, if not corrected, could result 

in foreign object penetration of the fuel 

tank, which could cause a fuel leak near 

an ignition source (e.g., hot brakes or 

engine exhaust nozzle), consequently 

leading to a fuel-fed fire. 

Relevant Service Information 

We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin 

757–28–0118, dated January 12, 2012; 

and critical design configuration control 

limitation (CDCCL) Task 57–AWL–01, 

‘‘Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access 

Doors,’’ of Section 9, Airworthiness 

Limitations (AWLs) and Certification 

Requirements (CMRs) of Boeing 757 

Maintenance Planning Data Document 

D622N001–9, Revision August 2012. For 

information on the procedures and 

compliance times, see this service 

information at http:// 

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0693. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of these same 

type designs. 

Proposed AD Requirements 

The FAA issued section 121.316 of 

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 

CFR 121.316) requiring that each 

turbine powered transport category 

airplane meet the requirements of 

section 25.963(e) of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations (14 CFR 25.963(e)). Section 

25.963(e) outlines the certification 

requirements for fuel tank access covers 

on turbine powered transport category 

airplanes. 

This proposed AD would require 

inspecting fuel tank access doors to 

determine that impact-resistant access 

doors are installed in the correct 

locations and replacing any door with 

an impact-resistant access door if 

necessary; inspecting application of 

stencils and index markers of impactresistant access doors and application of 

new stencils or index markers if 

necessary; and revising the maintenance 

program. 

This proposed AD requires revisions 

to certain operator maintenance 

documents to include a new CDCCL. 

Compliance with CDCCLs is required by 

section 91.403(c) of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations (14 CFR 91.403(c)). For 

airplanes that have been previously 

modified, altered, or repaired in the 

areas addressed by this proposed AD, 

the operator might not be able to 

accomplish the actions described in the 

revisions. In this situation, to comply 

with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator 

must request approval for an alternative 

method of compliance according to the 

procedures specified in paragraph (j) of 

this proposed AD. The request should 

include a description of changes to the 

required actions that will ensure the 

continued damage tolerance of the 

affected structure. 

After accomplishing the revision 

required by paragraph (h) of this AD, no 

alternative actions (e.g., inspections), 

intervals, and/or CDCCLs may be used 

unless the actions, intervals, and/or 

CDCCLs are approved as an alternative 

method of compliance (AMOC) in 

accordance with the procedures 

specified in paragraph (j) of this AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 86 airplanes of U.S. registry. We 

estimate the following costs to comply 

with this proposed AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Inspection ........................................................ 8 work-hours × $85 per hour = $680 ............. $0 $680 $58,480 

Maintenance Program Revision ...................... 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ................. 0 85 7,310 

We estimate the following costs to do 

any necessary replacements that would 

be required based on the results of the 

proposed inspection. We have no way of 

determining the number of aircraft that 

might need these replacements: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Proposed Rules 49381 

ON-CONDITION COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Replacement per door .................................................. 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ........................... $8,000 $8,255 

Stencil and index marker .............................................. 4 work-hours × $85 per hour = $340 ........................... 0 340 

According to the manufacturer, some 

of the costs of this proposed AD may be 

covered under warranty, thereby 

reducing the cost impact on affected 

individuals. We do not control warranty 

coverage for affected individuals. As a 

result, we have included all costs in our 

cost estimate. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0693; Directorate Identifier 2013– 

NM–059–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by September 

30, 2013. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 757–200 and –200PF series airplanes; 

certificated in any category; as identified in 

Boeing Service Bulletin 757–28–0118, dated 

January 12, 2012. 

(d) Subject 

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/ 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of America 

Code 28, Fuel. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by reports 

indicating that a standard access door was 

located where an impact-resistant access 

door was required, and stencils were missing 

from some impact-resistant access doors. We 

are issuing this AD to prevent foreign object 

penetration of the fuel tank, which could 

cause a fuel leak near an ignition source (e.g., 

hot brakes or engine exhaust nozzle), 

consequently leading to a fuel-fed fire. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Inspections 

Within 72 months after the effective date 

of this AD, do the actions specified in 

paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 757– 

28–0118, dated January 12, 2012. 

(1) Do a general visual inspection of the 

left- and right-hand wing fuel tank access 

doors to determine whether impact-resistant 

access doors are installed in the correct 

locations. If any standard access door is 

found, before further flight, replace with an 

impact-resistant access door, in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Boeing Service Bulletin 757–28–0118, dated 

January 12, 2012. 

(2) Do a general visual inspection of the 

left- and right-hand wing fuel tank impactresistant access doors to verify stencils and 

index markers are applied. If a stencil or 

index marker is missing, before further flight, 

apply stencil or index marker, as applicable, 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 757– 

28–0118, dated January 12, 2012. 

(h) Maintenance Program Revision 

Within 60 days after the effective date of 

this AD, revise the maintenance program to 

incorporate critical design configuration 

control limitations (CDCCLs) Task 57–AWL– 

01, ‘‘Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access 

Doors,’’ of Section 9, Airworthiness 

Limitations (AWLs) and Certification 

Requirements (CMRs) of Boeing 757 

Maintenance Planning Data Document 

D622N001–9, Revision August 2012. 

(i) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or 

CDCCLs 

After accomplishing the revision required 

by paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative 

actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/or 

CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, 

intervals, and/or CDCCLs are approved as an 

alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in 

accordance with the procedures specified in 

paragraph (j) of this AD. 

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in the 

Related Information section of this AD. 

Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
49382 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO 

to make those findings. For a repair method 

to be approved, the repair must meet the 

certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Suzanne Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, 

Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

phone: 425–917–6438; fax: 425–917–6590; 

email: suzanne.lucier@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 

6, 2013. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–19753 Filed 8–13–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

32 CFR Part 68 

[Docket No. DOD–2013–OS–0093] 

RIN 0790–AJ06 

Voluntary Education Programs 

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of 

Defense for Personnel and Readiness, 

DoD. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: In this proposed rule, the 

Department of Defense (DoD) discusses 

new policy, responsibilities, and 

procedures for the operation of 

voluntary education programs within 

DoD. The new policies discussed in the 

rule include the following. 

All educational institutions providing 

education programs through the DoD 

Tuition Assistance (TA) Program will 

provide meaningful information to 

students about the financial cost and 

attendance at an institution so military 

students can make informed decisions 

on where to attend school; not use 

unfair, deceptive, and abusive recruiting 

practices; and provide academic and 

student support services to Service 

members and their families. New 

criteria are created to strengthen 

existing procedures for access to 

military installations by educational 

institutions. An annual review and 

notification process is required if there 

are changes made to the uniform 

semester-hour (or equivalent) TA caps 

and annual TA ceilings. Military 

Departments will be required to provide 

their Service members with a joint 

services transcript (JST). The DoD 

Postsecondary Education Complaint 

System is implemented for Service 

members, spouses, and adult family 

members to register student complaints. 

The Military Departments are 

authorized to establish Service-specific 

TA eligibility criteria and management 

controls. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

September 30, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

general information concerning DoD 

Voluntary Education Programs, send a 

written inquiry to Ms. Carolyn Baker, at 

the Office of the Under Secretary of 

Defense (Personnel & Readiness), 

Military Community & Family Policy, 

State Liaison and Educational 

Opportunities, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 

Suite 14E08, Alexandria, Virginia 

22350–2300 (Phone: 571–372–5355 or 

email: carolyn.baker@osd.mil). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Executive Summary 

This proposed rule implements 

Voluntary Education Programs for 

Military Service members. This rule 

includes educational programs that 

enable Service members to earn a degree 

on their off-duty time. Congress has 

held that men and women serving in the 

Armed Forces should have at least the 

same opportunity to advance 

academically as do civilians who 

remain outside the military. 

Funding for Voluntary Education 

Programs is authorized by law and is 

subject to the availability of funds from 

each Service. Voluntary education 

programs include tuition assistance 

(TA) (per 10 U.S.C. 2007), which is 

administered uniformly across the 

Services. Subject to appropriations, each 

Service pays no more than $250.00 per 

semester-unit (or equivalent) for tuition. 

Each Service member participating in 

off-duty, voluntary education is eligible 

for up to $4,500.00, in aggregate, for 

each fiscal year. TA can only be used for 

courses offered by postsecondary 

institutions accredited by a national or 

regional accrediting body recognized by 

the U.S. Department of Education. 

A March 2011 Government 

Accountability Office report on the DoD 

TA program recommended the 

Department take steps to enhance its 

oversight of schools receiving TA funds 

(available at http://www.gao.gov/ 

new.items/d11300.pdf). As a result, a 

DoD Memorandum of Understanding 

(MOU) requirement was included in 

this rule, which is designated not only 

to improve Departmental oversight but 

also to account for our Service members’ 

unique lifestyle requirements. The 

purpose of the DoD MOU is to establish 

a partnership between the Department 

and institutions to improve educational 

opportunities while protecting the 

integrity of each institution’s core 

educational values. This partnership 

serves to ensure a quality, viable 

program exists that provides for our 

Service members to realize their 

educational goals, while allowing for 

judicious oversight of taxpayer dollars. 

Background 

The purpose of voluntary education 

programs is to provide active duty 

Service members with opportunities to 

enhance their academic achievement 

which in turn improves job performance 

and promotion potential. A final rule for 

DoD’s Voluntary Education Programs 

was published in the Federal Register 

on December 6, 2012 (77 FR 72941– 

72956). The rule established the new 

requirement for a standardized 

memorandum of understanding (MOU) 

between DoD and the Institutions of 

Higher Learning (IHLs) prior to 

participating in DoD Voluntary 

Education Programs, such as the 

military tuition assistance program. As 

of June 25, 2013, 3,155 IHLs with a total 

of 4,180 sub-campuses have signed the 

DoD MOU. 

This new proposed rule includes 

requirements stated in the President’s 

Executive Order 13607, ‘‘Establishing 

Principles of Excellence for Educational 

Institutions Servicing Service Members, 

Veterans, Spouses, and Other Family 

Members’’, signed April 27, 2012 

(available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ 

pkg/FR-2012-05-02/pdf/2012- 

10715.pdf). In implementing the EO, 

three interagency working groups were 

established (information, compliance, 

and report), along with an aggressive 

timeline to ensure that the policies take 

effect as soon as possible. The E.O. 

directed DoD to coordinate with the 

Departments of Veterans Affairs and 

Education, and in consultation with the 

Department of Justice and the Consumer 

Financial Protection Bureau, to 

implement and promote compliance 

with the principles stated in the E.O. 

Several of these principles were covered 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS