# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-857V Filed: October 30, 2015

UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DENNIS PARKER, *

* Petitioner, *

v. * * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; Stipulation

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Diana Stadelnikas Sedar, Maglio Christ opher and Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Adriana Teitel, U.S. Department of Just ice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNE YS’ FEES AND COSTS 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On September 16, 2014, petitioner fil ed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensat ion Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 [the “Vaccine Act”]. Petitioner alleged that he suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) due to the influenza [“flu”] vaccination he received on November 28, 2012. Petition, ¶¶ 1, 12-13; On October 30, 2015, the undersigned issu ed a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on the parties’ Stipulation.

On October 30, 2015, the parti es filed a Stipulat ion of Fact Concerning Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. According to the stipulatio n, the parties stipulate to an award of

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-3 47, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 $17,250.00. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of r easonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e). Bas ed on the reasonableness of pet itioner’s request and the lack of any objection by respondent, the undersigned GRANTS the request for approval and payment of attorne ys’ fees and costs.

Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $17,250.00 3 as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel Diana L. Stadelnikas, Esq.

The clerk of the court shall ent er judgment in accordance herewith. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses in curred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced co sts” as well as fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an a ttorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y, HHS , 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment c an be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.