Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules 4905 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 6, 2015, and 

effective September 15, 2015, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ANM WA E5 Shelton, WA [New] 

Sanderson Field Airport, WA 

(Lat. 47°14′01′′ N., long. 1243°08′51′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 4-mile radius 

of the Sanderson Field Airport, and that 

airspace 1.5 miles either side of the 068° 

bearing from airport extending from the 4- 

mile radius to 5 miles northeast of the 

airport, and that airspace 2.3 miles either 

side of the 248° bearing from airport 

extending from the 4-mile radius to 9.5 miles 

southwest of the airport. 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on January 

15, 2016. 

Tracey Johnson, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Western 

Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01503 Filed 1–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0366; FRL–9941–52– 

Region 5] 

Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Inver 

Hills SO2

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

revision to the Minnesota sulfur dioxide 

(SO2) State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

for Northern States Power Company’s 

Xcel Energy-Inver Hills Generating 

Plant, located in Inver Grove Heights, 

Minnesota. The revision, submitted by 

the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 

on May 1, 2015, incorporates a more 

stringent limit for the sulfur content of 

the fuel used at the facility, and 

modifies the fuel analysis requirements 

to meet the more stringent limit. These 

revisions will not result in an increase 

in SO2 emissions at the facility. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 29, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2015–0366 at http://

www.regulations.gov or via email to 

blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments 

submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Once submitted, comments 

cannot be edited or removed from 

Regulations.gov. For either manner of 

submission, EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e. 

on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, please contact the person 

identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 

full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles Hatten, Environmental 

Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031, 

hatten.charles@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving Minnesota’s 

SO2 SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If EPA does not receive adverse 

comments in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, EPA will 

withdraw the direct final rule and will 

address all public comments received in 

a subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. Please note 

that if EPA receives adverse comment 

on an amendment, paragraph, or section 

of this rule, and if that provision can be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. For additional 

information, see the direct final rule 

which is located in the Rules section of 

this Federal Register. 

Dated: January 13, 2016. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01576 Filed 1–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0644; FRL–9941–66– 

Region 7] 

Approval of Missouri’s Air Quality 

Implementation Plans; Americold 

Logistics, LLC 24-Hour Particulate 

Matter (PM10) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS) Consent 

Judgment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

revision to the State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of 

Missouri on June 2, 2014. This proposed 

SIP revision will incorporate a consent 

judgment to address violations of the 

24-hour particulate matter (PM10) 

NAAQS near the Americold Logistics, 

LLC, Carthage Crushed Limestone (CCL) 

facility near Carthage, Missouri. CCL is 

a limestone quarry operations. The 

consent judgment between the State of 

Missouri and CCL includes measures 

that will control PM10 emissions from 

the facility. This proposed approval will 

make the consent judgment Federallyenforceable. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

action must be received in writing by 

February 29, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2015–0644, to http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 


wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4906 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Heather Hamilton, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 

(913) 551–7039, or by email at 

hamilton.heather@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the states 

SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

revision amendment and anticipates no 

relevant adverse comments to this 

action. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action, 

no further activity is contemplated in 

relation to this action. If EPA receives 

relevant adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this action. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this action should do so 

at this time. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comments on part of 

this rule and if that part can be severed 

from the remainder of the rule, EPA may 

adopt as a final those parts of the rule 

that are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 

dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides. 

Dated: January 11, 2016. 

Mark Hague, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01661 Filed 1–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS