alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6806]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-331-018]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, Seventh Revised Sheet No. 12 and 
FT Service Agreement <greek-i>F11097, between National Fuel and Duferco 
Farrell Corporation, together with Amendment No. I thereto. The tariff 
sheet has a proposed effective date of April 1, 2007.
    National Fuel states that copies of this filing were served upon 
its customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0969582939fbebcb9beb583a5a0a0bfa2a490b6b5a2b3feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ecaaa9beafa38280858289bf999c9c839e98ac8a899e8fc28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6806 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2007269EN.01006302.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/63

---

Action brought on 18 September 2007 — Pfizer v OHIM — Isdin (FOTOPROTECTOR ISDIN)

(Case T-354/07)

(2007/C 269/115)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Pfizer Ltd (Sandwich, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck, T. Dolde, lawyers, and M. Hawkins, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Isdin, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 June 2007 in Case R 567/2006-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 June 2007 in Case R 567/2006-1; and

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘FOTOPROTECTOR ISDIN’ for products in among others class 5 — Community trade mark No 1 075 597

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Isdin, SA

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The national word mark ‘ISTIN’ for goods in class 5

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partial declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Cancellation Division's decision insofar as it declared the invalidity of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of the applicant's right to be heard pursuant to Article 73 of Council Regulation No 40/94 and violation of Article 52 read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of the regulation.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 13.2



Certification by the Chief Financial
Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



In connection with the Transition Report
of Sky-mobi Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fischer Xiaodong Chen, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April  27, 2015





|By: | /s/ Fischer Xiaodong
    Chen |                          
|--- | ----------------------------- | -------------------------
|    | Name:                         | Fischer Xiaodong
    Chen
|    | Title:                        | Chief Financial Officer
Case: 2:11-cv-00777-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 1 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00777-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 2 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00777-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 3 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00777-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 4 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00777-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 5 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00777-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 6 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00777-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 7 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00777-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 8 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00777-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 9 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00777-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 10 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T10:29:03-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Order entered December 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01179-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.L.H.

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 93-2714-Y

ORDER

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Brown, and Schenck

Appellee Frances Reese’s December 1, 2015 Motion for Frivolous Appeal and Damages

is DENIED.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
No. 44151.

#### Protest 997888-G of Kurt Koesel (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial certain white plates were admitted in evidence and it was agreed between counsel that they consist of earthenware, plain white, not painted, colored, tinted, stained, enameled, gilded, printed, *287ornamented, or decorated in any manner. The claim at 45 percent ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen under paragraph 211 was therefore sustained as to these plates.
NO. 07-02-0112-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 15, 2002

______________________________ JOHN JOSEPH HINDERA Appellant
v. NELSON DOMETRIUS

Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 2 37TH DI STRICT COURT OF LU BBOCK COU NTY; NO. 99-507,408; HON. SAM MEDINA, PRESIDING

_______________________________ ORDER OF ABA

TEMENT

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS , JJ. John Joseph Hindera (appellant) appe als the Fe bruary 1, 2 001 judgment of the 237th District

Court of Lubbock C ounty in fav or of appellee. Sub sequent to the filing of the notice of appeal, this c ourt received notice from appell ant ’s counsel t h at he had filed a voluntarypetition as debtor under C hapter 7 of the Uni ted States Bankr uptcy Code. Said notice inc lude d a fi le-marked co py of said peti tion. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, any further action i n this appeal i s automaticall y stay ed.2

Under these circ umstances, and for admi nistrative purposes, thi s appeal is remo ved from the do cket of

this Court

and abated. The appeal will b e reinstated upon proper motion showing that the stay has been lifted or that the Court may otherwise proceed wi th the dispositi on of the cause. Accordingl y, the appeal is abated.

Per Curiam
Do not publish

.
# C_2007247EN.01002201.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/22

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2007 — MTU Friedrichshafen v Commission

(Case T-196/02) (1)

1

(State aid - Restructuring aid - Decision ordering the recovery of aid incompatible with the common market - Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Joint and several liability)

(2007/C 247/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH (Friedrichshafen, Germany) (represented by F. Montag and T. Lübbig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by V. Kreuschitz, V. Di Bucci and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Article 3(2) of Commission Decision 2002/898/EC of 9 April 2002 on the State aid implemented by Germany for SKL Motoren- und Systembautechnik GmbH (OJ 2002 L 314, p. 75).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 3(2) of Commission Decision 2002/898/EC of 9 April 2002 on the State aid implemented by Germany for SKL Motoren- und Systembautechnik GmbH, in so far as it orders MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH to repay jointly and severally a sum of EUR 2,71 million; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 3(2) of Commission Decision 2002/898/EC of 9 April 2002 on the State aid implemented by Germany for SKL Motoren- und Systembautechnik GmbH, in so far as it orders MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH to repay jointly and severally a sum of EUR 2,71 million;

| 2. | orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by MTU Friedrichshafen. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by MTU Friedrichshafen.

---

(1)  OJ C 219, 14.9.2002.

1

---
# C_2008005EN.01000102.xml

| 10.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4966 — Cinven/Coor Management Services)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 5/02)

On 19 December 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4966. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4966. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# America the beautiful: Massachusetts

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  America the beautiful: Massachusetts 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Beef cattle on improved pasture, Berkshire conservation district 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Agriculture 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1960-1970 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  Massachusetts 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  150 × 60 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  A57.8-2.M38.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21

- 1474 V

UNPUBLISHED

GREGGORY DAVIS

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: July 29, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Michael Adly Baseluos, Baseluos Law Firm PLLC, San Antonia, T X , for Petitioner.

Joseph Adam Lewis , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On June 15, 2021

, Greggory Davis filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain

- Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) which

meets the Table definition for GBS or which, in the alternative, was caused

- in

- fact by the

influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on October 13 , 2020. Petition at 1, ¶ 1. T he case was

assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 11, 2022

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.

Specifically, R espondent believes “ that [P]etitioner has sati sfied the criteria set forth in

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I wil l redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012 ).2

the Vaccine Injury Table ( “ Table ” ) and the Qualificat ions and Aids to Interpretation ( “ QAI ” )

for GBS fol lowing flu vaccination

. ” Id. at 9

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
# C_2007211EN.01005001.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/50

---

Action brought on 16 July 2007 — People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council

(Case T-256/07)

(2007/C 211/94)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (Auvers sur Oise, France) (represented by: J.P. Spitzer, lawyer, and D. Vaughan, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Decision 2007/445/EC of the Council insofar as it applies to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Decision 2007/445/EC of the Council insofar as it applies to the applicant;

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicant's costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicant's costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the partial annulment of Council Decision 2007/445/EC of 28 June 2007 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decisions 2006/379/EC and 2006/1008/EC (1) maintaining the applicant on the list of the persons, groups and entities to whom a freeze of funds and other financial resources applies.

1

In support of its application, the applicant submits that the contested Council decision should be annulled because the Council continued to rely on the listing of the applicant in Decision 2006/379/EC which should have been annulled or amended by the Council with regard to the applicant following the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-228/02 Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran v Council [2006] ECR II-0000. According to the applicant the Council was under an obligation to remove the applicant's name from the said list.

Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran

Council

Furthermore, the applicant contends that the contested decision was adopted in violation of the applicant's right to be heard and without proper reasoning.

Moreover, the applicant claims that the contested decision was adopted on the basis of material all of which related to the period prior to the year 2001 and without taking into consideration material relating to the years after 2001 adduced by the applicant.

Finally, the applicant alleges that these circumstances amount to an abuse or misuse of powers.

---

(1)  OJ 2007 L 169, p. 58.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 15.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Le Gaga Holdings Limited: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-173979) on Form S-8 of Le Gaga Holdings Limited of our report datedOctober 30, 2014, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Le Gaga Holdings Limited and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2012, June 30, 2012, June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2014, and the relatedconsolidated statements of profit or loss, statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, statements of changes in equity and statements of cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2012, the three months ended June 30, 2012and the years ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, which report appears in the June 30, 2014 annual report on Form 20-F of Le Gaga Holdings Limited. 

/s/ KPMG 

Hong Kong, China 

October 30, 2014
#### Lewis N. Putnam, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

— Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by Barker, J.