alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bitauto Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Xuan Zhang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 20, 2015



By:

/s/ Xuan ZhangName:

Xuan ZhangTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2007183EN.01002101.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/21

---

Action brought on 30 May 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-255/07)

(2007/C 183/35)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and D. Kukovec, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (1), or in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (1), or in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2004/18/EC into national law expired on 31 January 2006.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 10228)

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. A-7164.

(Decided April 23, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*William H. Orriok, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have sub. mitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> *626IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED tliat *the*items on *the*invoices covered by the above-entitled reappraisement appeal, which is marked “A” and initialed WM (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner William H. Mallett (Examiner’s Name) consist of vat-lined pulpboard similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *A. N. Deringer, Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dee. 9927, and therein held to be dutiable on the basis of export value under Sec. 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956; that the record in said Reap. Dec. 9927 may be incorporated herein; that at the time of exportation said export value was the invoice price; and that the instant appeal may be submitted upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts and following the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is statutory export value and hold that such value for this merchandise is the invoice price.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(d) Certification

 

I, In-Young Chase, certify that:

 

1.       I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10–K of SATURNS Trust No. 2010-01 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.        Based on my knowledge,the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.       Based on my knowledge,all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered bythis report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.        Based on my knowledgeand the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicer, The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of SATURNS Trust No. 2010-01, has fulfilledits obligations under the servicing agreement, which is the Trust Agreement relating to SATURNS Trust No. 2010-01; and

 

5.        All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessmentof compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and its officers and agents.

 

 

 

By:/s/In-Young Chase

Name:	In-Young Chase
Exhibit 20.1

Subsidiaries of FS Energy and Power Fund



Name of Subsidiary

State of Incorporation or OrganizationBerwyn Funding LLC

DelawareBryn Mawr Funding LLC

DelawareEnergy Funding LLC

DelawareEP Altus Investments, LLC

DelawareEP American Energy Investments, Inc.

DelawareEP Burnett Investments, Inc.

DelawareEP Northern Investments, LLC

DelawareEP Synergy Investments, Inc.

DelawareFoxfields Funding LLC

DelawareFS Energy Investments, LLC

DelawareFS Power Investments, LLC

DelawareFSEP Investments, Inc.

DelawareFSEP Term Funding, LLC

DelawareFSEP-BBH, Inc.

DelawareGladwyne Funding LLC

DelawareStrafford Funding LLC

DelawareWayne Funding LLC

Delaware


---



QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JAMES A. CURTIS, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

17 USCMA 478, 38 CMR 276

No. 20,856

April 5, 1968

*Captain Peter B. Work,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant*H. *L. Moore,*USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Hilda Y, Judge:

The accused was arraigned before a general court-martial convened at Camp Pendleton, California, charged with desertion and failure to obey a lawful order, in violation of Articles 85 and 92, 10 USC §§ 885 and 892, respectively. He pleaded guilty and was found guilty as charged. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for three years. The convening authority approved the dishonorable discharge and total forfeitures, but only confinement at hard labor for eighteen months. A board of review in the office of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy then affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence as reduced. This Court granted review to consider the arraignment of this accused and others in an *“en masse”*proceeding. We also note that at the sentencing stage of this trial the law officer alluded to his instructions on procedural matters given the court that same, day in an earlier case. Both procedures are in error.

On the other hand, the waiver of speedy trial and due process contained in a stipulation of fact accompanying the memorandum of pretrial agreement is specifically shown therein not to be a part of the consideration for the agreement.

Be that as it may, for the reasons set forth in United States v Pratt, 17 *479USCMA 464, 38 CMR 262; United States v DeShazo, 17 USCMA 472, 38 CMR 270; United States v Shafer, 17 USCMA 456, 38 CMR 254; United States v Brewer, 17 USCMA 474, 38 CMR 272; United States v Dyer, 17 USCMA 475, 38 CMR 273; and United States v Lance, 17 USCMA 470, 38 CMR 268, accused has suffered no prejudice.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting);

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinions in United States v Pratt, 17 USCMA 464, 38 CMR 262, United States v DeShazo, 17 USCMA 472, 38 CMR 270, and United States v Forwerck, 12 USCMA 540, 31 CMR 126, I would reverse the decision of the board of review and order a rehearing. A guilty plea simply cannot be used as an excuse to transmute a judicial proceeding into an assembly line procedure, whereby an accused bargains himself into the penitentiary. Accordingly, I register my disagreement with the result herein approved by my brethren.
Case: 2:11-cv-00588-ALM-NMK Doc #: 16 Filed: 04/23/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T20:19:57-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### Meadows Wye & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6690.

Entry No. 727062/1, etc.

Invoices dated Leicester, England, October 16, 1941, etc.

Certified October 22, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 28, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 30, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items-of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48,” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined-in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Adminis--trative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The cited ease has been incorporated herein by consent of the parties who-further agree on a set of facts, embodied in a written stipulation submitting the-*256present cases, showing export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values are the appraised values •of the articles in question, less additions made by the importers on entry because iof advances in similar cases.
# C_2007211EN.01005102.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/51

---

Action brought on 17 July 2007 — Algusa Algodinera Utrerana v Council and Commission

(Case T-259/07)

(2007/C 211/97)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Algusa Algodinera Utrerana SA (Sevilla, Spain) (represented by: L. Ortiz Blanco, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities

Defendants:

Form of order sought

| — | declare under Article 288 EC that the applicant is entitled to have damage totalling seven hundred and twenty one thousand three hundred and fifty five euros (EUR 721 355) made good by the Council and the Commission jointly and severally; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare under Article 288 EC that the applicant is entitled to have damage totalling seven hundred and twenty one thousand three hundred and fifty five euros (EUR 721 355) made good by the Council and the Commission jointly and severally;

| — | order the defendants to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendants to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-217/07 Las Palmeras v Council and Commission.

Las Palmeras

Council and Commission

---
---







Consent of Expert



In connection with the Annual Report on form 40-F for the year
ended December 31, 2016 (the Form 40-F) of Timmins Gold Corp., I, Mani M.
Verma, P.Eng. hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the
references to the mineral reserve and resource estimates for the San Francisco
Project and to the technical report entitled NI 43-101 F1 Technical Report
Updated Resources and Reserves and Mine Plan for the San Francisco Gold Project,
Sonora, Mexico, dated November 25, 2016 (collectively, the Technical
Information) and to the incorporation by reference of references to, and
summaries of, the Technical Information in the Form 40-F.



Mani VermaSignature of Qualified
Person

Mani M. VermaName of Qualified Person

Associate Mining EngineerTitle of Qualified Person

March 20, 2017



SUITE 900 - 390 BAY STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 2Y2Telephone (1) (416) 362-5135 Fax (1) (416) 362 5763

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 879-1600, the US Postal Service information hotline

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 879-1600, the US Postal Service information hotline 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Postal Service 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  192 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019759758.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# In the barber shop, a new deal for American art new deal art, 1933-1943 golden anniversary

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  In the barber shop, a new deal for American art new deal art, 1933-1943 golden anniversary 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. General Services AdministrationBolotowsky, Ilya, 1907-1981 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. General Services Administration 
                    -           Description        
                    -  In the barber Shop by Ilya Bolotowky, c. 1934 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  New York 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 77 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018795653.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

MARY CATHERINE McKAY,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

COMMISSIONER OF CASE NO. C2-11-328

SOCIAL SECURITY JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed August 30, 2012, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered for the Defendant. This case is DISMISSED.

Date: August 30, 2012 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00328-EAS-MRA Doc #: 21 Filed: 08/30/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Before the Second Division,

June 15, 1955

No. 59141.

protest 202480-K (Galveston).

#### Leslie B. Canion and Service Drilling Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, *J.*

*In*accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel A. P. I. casings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 32, C. D. 1577), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2007297EN.01004202.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/42

---

Action brought on 26 September 2007 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-376/07)

(2007/C 297/86)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and J. Möller)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2007) 3226 of 18 July 2007 concerning an order to provide information in relation to MX 19/2006 — Monitoring of State aid scheme XS 24/2002 — Financing of business start-ups and growth (‘GuW’) — Germany and MX 9/2006 — Monitoring of State aid scheme XS 29/2002 — Guidelines for implementing the Bavarian regional aid programme for industry and commerce — Germany; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2007) 3226 of 18 July 2007 concerning an order to provide information in relation to MX 19/2006 — Monitoring of State aid scheme XS 24/2002 — Financing of business start-ups and growth (‘GuW’) — Germany and MX 9/2006 — Monitoring of State aid scheme XS 29/2002 — Guidelines for implementing the Bavarian regional aid programme for industry and commerce — Germany;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 3226 final of 18 July 2007 concerning an order to provide information pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 (1) in relation to State aid schemes XS 24/2002 and XS 29/2002.

1

In support of its application, the applicant submits first that the contested decision infringes Regulation (EC) No 994/98 (2). The applicant submits in this regard that by making this request for information, the Commission is carrying out an ex-post control without cause. According to the applicant, that control goes beyond the authority which Regulation No 994/98 confers on the defendant, which provides that the Commission has the right to request information only if it harbours doubts concerning the proper implementation of a group exemption regulation.

2

ex-post

In addition, the applicant claims that there has been an infringement of the principle of nemini licet venire contra factum proprium (estoppel), because several Commission documents show that the Commission itself assumes that it does not have the authority to conduct an ex-post control without cause.

nemini licet venire contra factum proprium

ex-post

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ 2001 L 10, p. 33).

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 of 7 May 1998 on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community to certain categories of horizontal State aid (OJ 1998 L 142, p. 1).

2

---