alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 974-2500, the US Postal Service information hotline

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 974-2500, the US Postal Service information hotline 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Postal Service 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  191 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019289485.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 32.2

Registrant (Commission File Number 333-110029):

Broder Bros., Co.

Six Neshaminy Interplex, 6thFloor

Trevose, Pennsylvania 19053

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Broder Bros., Co. on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Hollister, Chief Financial Officer of Broder Bros., Co., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broder Bros., Co.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 15, 2006



BRODER BROS., CO.By:

/s/ DAVID J. HOLLISTERDavid J. Hollister Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 900 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 900

  To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to allow for the 
 consideration of private flood insurance for the purposes of applying 
       continuous coverage requirements, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

Ms. Castor of Florida (for herself and Mr. Luetkemeyer) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to allow for the 
 consideration of private flood insurance for the purposes of applying 
       continuous coverage requirements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EFFECT OF PRIVATE FLOOD INSURANCE COVERAGE ON CONTINUOUS 
              COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 1308 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 
4015) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Effect of Private Flood Insurance Coverage on Continuous 
Coverage Requirements.--For purposes of applying any statutory, 
regulatory, or administrative continuous coverage requirement, 
including under section 1307(g)(1), the Administrator shall consider 
any period during which a property was continuously covered by a flood 
insurance policy, either offered through the national flood insurance 
program or private market, that was used to satisfy the requirements 
under section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 
U.S.C. 4012a(a)) to be a period of continuous coverage.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2007239EN.01001802.xml

| 11.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/18

---

Corrigendum to LIFE+ Call for proposals 2007

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 232 of 4 October 2007
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 232 of 4 October 2007

(2007/C 239/09)

On page 11, ‘EU Cofinancing rates’, point 2, ‘LIFE+ Environment Policy and Governance’, the second indent is cancelled.

---
GREGORY DANIELS, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CRIM. NO. 2:11-CR-00108 

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1067 

JUDGE MICHAEL H. WATSON 

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On April 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation 

recommending that counsel be appointed on Petitioner's behalf to represent him on the claim 

regarding defense counsel's failure to advise him regarding the entrapment defense. Although 

the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. 

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Counsel has already 

been appointed on Petitioner's behalf to represent him at an evidentiary hearing on his claim 

regarding counsel's alleged failure to advise him regarding the entrapment defense. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case: 2:11-cr-00108-MHW-EPD Doc #: 61 Filed: 04/25/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007315EN.01001101.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 October 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Hasselt — Belgium) — Maria Geurts, Dennis Vogten v Administratie van de BTW, registratie en domeinen, Belgische Staat

(Case C-464/05) (1)

1

(Articles 43 EC and 56 EC - National tax legislation - Inheritance tax - Family company - Exemption - Conditions - Employment of a certain number of workers in a region of a Member State)

(2007/C 315/17)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Hasselt

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Maria Geurts, Dennis Vogten

Applicants:

Defendant: Administratie van de BTW, registratie en domeinen, Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Burgerlijke Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Hasselt — Interpretation of Articles 43 EC and 56 EC — Inheritance arising in a region of a Member State involving shares in a family company in another Member State and claims against that company — Provision for exemption from inheritance tax if that company has employed at least five full-time workers in that region during the three years prior to the death of the deceased — Whether compatible with Articles 43 EC and 56 EC

Operative part of the judgment

In the absence of valid justification, Article 43 EC precludes inheritance tax legislation of a Member State which excludes from the exemption from that tax available for family undertakings those undertakings which employ in the three years preceding the date of death of the deceased at least five workers in another Member State, whereas it grants such an exemption where the workers are employed in a region of the first Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.3.2006.

1

---
# C_2007269EN.01000801.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-318/05) (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Articles 18 EC, 39 EC, 43 EC and 49 EC - Income tax legislation - School fees - Tax deductibility limited to school fees paid to national private establishments)

(2007/C 269/15)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Gross and R. Lyal, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and U. Forsthoff, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 18, 39, 43 and 49 EC — National income tax legislation which excludes without exception the possibility to deduct tax in respect of school fees of children who are receiving education abroad.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1) | By generally excluding school fees for attending a school situated in another Member State from the tax deduction for special expenses under Article 10(1)(9) of the Law on Income Tax (Einkommensteuergesetz) in the version published on 19 October 2002, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 18 EC, 39 EC, 43 EC and 49 EC. |
| --- | --- |

1)

By generally excluding school fees for attending a school situated in another Member State from the tax deduction for special expenses under Article 10(1)(9) of the Law on Income Tax (Einkommensteuergesetz) in the version published on 19 October 2002, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 18 EC, 39 EC, 43 EC and 49 EC.

| 2) | The remainder of the action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

2)

The remainder of the action is dismissed.

| 3) | The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 257, 15.10.2005.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                         4,552,278
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,541,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,109,880
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,950,909
<PP&E>                                         558,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,389,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,386,550
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       74,695
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,917,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,389,748
<SALES>                                        12,919,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,919,438
<CGS>                                          10,747,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,819,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                438,688
<INCOME-TAX>                                   140,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   298,688
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### John H. Faunce N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7371.

Invoice dated London, England, May 3, 1946.

Certified May 17, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 13, 1946.

Entry No. 768575.

(Decided September 4, 1947)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cartoon Acquisition, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randolph S.
Hudson, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17135-17136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 040207A]


Endangered Species; File No. 1580

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Dynegy Northeast Generations, Inc. 
(Dynegy), 992-994 River Road, Newburgh, New York 12550, has been issued 
a permit to take shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) for 
purposes of scientific research.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review

[[Page 17136]]

upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)427-2521; and
    Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-
2298; phone (978)281-9300; fax (978)281-9394.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandy Hutnak or Malcolm Mohead, 
(301)713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 6, 2006, notice was published 
in the Federal Register (71 FR 52534) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to take shortnose sturgeon had been submitted by the 
above-named organization. The requested permit has been issued under 
the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 
16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and the regulations governing the taking, 
importing, and exporting of endangered and threatened species (50 CFR 
parts 222-226).
    This permit authorizes Dynegy to annually capture up to 82 juvenile 
and adult shortnose sturgeon and 40 shortnose sturgeon larvae. 
Researchers are authorized to capture, handle, measure, weigh, scan for 
tags, Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) and Carlin tag, photograph, 
tissue sample, and release up to 82 juvenile and adult sturgeon. 
Additionally, researchers may lethally take up to 40 shortnose sturgeon 
larvae. This research will help to evaluate the life history, 
population trends, and spatial, temporal, and size distribution of the 
shortnose sturgeon collected in the Hudson River during an annual 
Biological Monitoring Program.
    Issuance of this permit, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit (1) was applied for in good faith, (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of such endangered or threatened 
species, and (3) is consistent with the purposes and policies set forth 
in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: April 2, 2007.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-6486 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
# C_2007269EN.01006001.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/60

---

Action brought on 10 September 2007 — O2 (Germany) v OHIM (Homezone)

(Case T-344/07)

(2007/C 269/108)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: O2 (Germany) GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 July 2007 in Case R 1583/2006-4 in so far as it rejects the application; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 July 2007 in Case R 1583/2006-4 in so far as it rejects the application;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those of the proceedings before OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those of the proceedings before OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Homezone’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 38 and 42 (application No 4 677 506).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: In part, rejection of the application.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and of Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1).

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/1994 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
#### Michaelian & Kohlberg, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6359.

Entry No. 710754, etc.

Invoices dated Longton, England, July 22, 1941, etc.

Certified July 29, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 26, 1941, etc.

(Decided September 19, 1946)

*Lane & Wallace (Thomas M. Lane*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6423

ROBERT G. MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EARL D. BESHEARS, Warden; QUENSEY, P.A.; OFFICER PARKS; OFFICER ADAMS; OFFICER MARSHALL;

LIEUTENANT SPROWL; OFFICER BALLARD; OFFICER

GRADY; OFFICER BROMLEY; LIEUTENANT VANN;

SERGEANT BARKER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-96-79-WMN)

Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 18, 1997

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert G. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert G. Moore appeals the district court order granting in

part and denying in part the Defendants' motion for summary judgment in Moore's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here

appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory

or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED