alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007283EN.01002502.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/25

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 October 2007 — Advance Magazine Publishers v OHIM — J. Capela & Irmãos Lda (VOGUE)

(Case T-481/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community word mark VOGUE - Earlier national word mark VOGUE Portugal - Facts raised for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal)

(2007/C 283/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc., established in New York, New York (United States), represented by M. Esteve Sanz, lawyer,

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by J. Laporta Insa, Agent,

Defendant:

Other party in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: J. Capela & Irmãos, L.da, (Porto, Portugal),

Other party in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

da

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal (OHIM) of 27 September 2004 (Case R 328/2003-2), concerning opposition proceedings between J. Capela & Irmãos, L.da and Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc.

da

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 27 September 2004 (Case R 328/2003-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 27 September 2004 (Case R 328/2003-2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc.

---

(1)  OJ C 57, 5.3.2005.

1

---
- FPL_1559-Jocr-1
- FPL_1559-Jocr-2
- FPL_1559-Jocr-3
- FPL_1559-Jocr-4
- FPL_1559-Jocr-5
- FPL_1559-Jocr-6
- FPL_1559-Jocr-7
- FPL_1559-Jocr-8
- FPL_1559-Jocr-9
- FPL_1559-Jocr-10
- FPL_1559-Jocr-11
Exhibit No. 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Texas Pacific Land Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), David M. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Trust,
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

| |  | TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST(Registrant)
| |  | ------------------------------------

|Date:  November 8, 2005 |  | By:/s/ David M. Peterson
       David M. Peterson, Assistant General Agent and
       Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7241** 

MICHAEL SCOTT SISTLER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. KENNETH E. LASSITER , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 5:13

- hc

- 02080

- F )

Submitted : December 16, 2015 Decided: December 29, 2015

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael Scott Sistler, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Scott Sis tler seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonabl e jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on pr ocedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed t he record and conclude that Sistler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Sistler’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Jamie L. Buskill, certify that:

1)

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Texas Gas Transmission, LLC;

2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)

Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under its supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report its conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5)

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Dated:  May 5, 2005

/s/ Jamie L. Buskill



Jamie L. Buskill

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8931 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8931

 To redesignate Saratoga National Historical Park as Saratoga National 
                           Battlefield Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 2, 2024

Ms. Stefanik (for herself and Mr. Tonko) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To redesignate Saratoga National Historical Park as Saratoga National 
                           Battlefield Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SARATOGA NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK.

    (a) Redesignation.--Saratoga National Historical Park shall 
hereafter be known and designated as ``Saratoga National Battlefield 
Park''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to Saratoga National 
Historical Park shall be deemed to be a reference to Saratoga National 
Battlefield Park.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008035EN.01000701.xml

| 8.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 February 2008

(2008/C 35/07)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4569 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 154,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4524 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,7491 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4403 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5985 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 97,96 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,07 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,621 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,9 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,618 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6785 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,675 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,762 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6367 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4732 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,369 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8565 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,065 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 372,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,369 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,476 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,272 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 464,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,718 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,004 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,0085 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,75 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5802 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,7842 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4569

JPY

Japanese yen

154,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4524

GBP

Pound sterling

0,7491

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4403

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5985

ISK

Iceland króna

97,96

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,07

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,621

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,9

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

PLN

Polish zloty

3,618

RON

Romanian leu

3,6785

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,675

TRY

Turkish lira

1,762

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6367

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4732

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,369

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8565

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,065

KRW

South Korean won

1 372,25

ZAR

South African rand

11,369

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,476

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,272

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 464,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,718

PHP

Philippine peso

59,004

RUB

Russian rouble

36,0085

THB

Thai baht

45,75

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5802

MXN

Mexican peso

15,7842

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Case No. 8,552.

#### LOVELL v. ALLIANCE LIFE INS. CO.

[3 Cent. Law J. 699; 6 Ins. Law J. 239.]

Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.

Oct. Term, 1876.

Insurance — Statements in Application — Effect of Missouri Statute as to Materiality.

This action was brought on a policy for $10,000. The defendant answered that by the terms of the policy, the application with all the statements therein became a part of the policy, and each and every representation made in obtaining the policy were warranties, that among other representations made by the assured, he stated that neither of his parents had ever had consumption, while in truth his mother had died of that disease, and that such representation was a warranty and avoided the policy. The plaintiff demurred on the ground that the policy sued on was executed in Missouri, and after the passage of the act of March 23, 1S74 (Laws 1S74, p. 89), which enacts that “no misrepresentation made in obtaining or securing a policy of insurance on the life or lives of any person or persons shall be deemed material, or under the policy void, unless the matter misrepresented shall have actually contributed to the contingency or event on which the policy is to become due and payable; and whether it so contributed in any case, shall be a question for the jury,” and that the defendant had failed to allege that the matter complained of in any way contributed to the-death of the assured.

THE COURT

held (1) that the application-having been made in Missouri, and the policy delivered and the premium paid here, that it was a Missouri contract; (2) that the act comprehended in its term all representations made in obtaining the policy, whether they were technical representations, or warranties.
|    |                                                                               |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of EverBank Financial Corp; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                               |
|-------------------------------|
|                               |
| /s/ Robert M. Clements        |
|                          |
| Robert M. Clements            |
| Chief Executive Officer       |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |
| Date: April 13, 2017          |
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Veterans Administration national salute to hospitalized veterans

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Veterans Administration national salute to hospitalized veterans 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Veterans Administration 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Veterans Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  151 × 41 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018277895.jpg; 018277895.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 53124.

#### Van Gelder-Fanto Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 145326-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the concentrated ox gall and sheep gall the subject of *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0995 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-056-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION of CFO PURSUANT TO  Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Report") of FS Energy and
Power Fund (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edward T. Gallivan, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to
the best of my knowledge, that:



Dated: March 18, 2014/s/ EDWARD T. GALLIVAN, JR. Edward T. Gallivan, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Susan M. Molineaux,
certify that;



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Calithera Biosciences, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Susan M. Molineaux                                                                       
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Susan M. Molineaux, Ph.D. President and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph T. Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Joseph T. MorrisJoseph T. MorrisChief Financial Officer


May 15, 2006
No. 53137.

#### Schenley Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 107216-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.