alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Which picture doesn't belong?

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Which picture doesn't belong? 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. American Forces Information Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 88-313-P. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; #4; Defense billboard (1988) ; #8. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 43 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 99.8






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. §1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of Extorre Gold Mines Limited (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darcy Daubaras, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   June 22, 2012
/s/ Darcy DaubarasDarcy Daubaras

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 12

                             TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



         The following table sets forth the company's ratio of earnings to
fixed charges for the periods indicated.


   NINE MONTHS    TWELVE MONTHS              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
      ENDED           ENDED       --------------------------------------------
SEPT. 30, 2000   SEPT. 30, 2000     1999      1998      1997    1996(4) 1995(4)
--------------   --------------   -------   -------    -----    ------  ------

     4.41x           4.10x (1)    3.82x(2)  4.51x(3)   4.38x     4.40x   4.28x


         For the purposes of calculating these ratios, earnings consist of
income before income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest
on indebtedness, amortization of debt premium, the interest component of
rentals and preferred stock dividend requirements.


(1)  Includes the effect of non-recurring pretax charges totaling $3.5 million
     recorded in the fourth quarter of 1999 at Tampa Electric to resolve
     litigation filed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The effect
     of this charge was to reduce the ratio of earnings to fixed charges. Had
     this charge been excluded from the calculation, the ratio of earning to
     fixed charges would have been 4.14x for the twelve-months ended Sept. 30,
     2000.

(2)  Includes the effect of one-time, pretax charges totaling $18.3 million
     described in (1) above. The effect of these charges was to reduce the
     ratio of earnings to fixed charges. Had these charges been excluded from
     the calculation, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges would have been
     4.61x for the year ended Dec. 31, 1999.

(3)  Includes the effect of one-time, pretax charges totaling $16.9 million.
     The effect of these charges was to reduce the ratio of earnings to fixed
     charges. Had these charges been excluded from the calculation, the ratio
     of earnings to fixed charges would have been 4.66x for the year ended Dec.
     31, 1998.

(4)  Amounts have been restated to reflect the merger of Peoples Gas System,
     Inc., with and into Tampa Electric Company.



                                      18
#### G. A. Bernheimer Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6679.

Entry No. 708752, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, August 18, 1944, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 11, 1944,’ etc.

(Decided December 27, 1946)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve the question of whether or not the so-called British purchase tax should be included as a part of the dutiable values of the merchandise. Counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issues herein and the issues in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, are similar in all material respects-, and the record in the latter case has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the facts as established, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeals to-be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importers on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2007192EN.01000201.xml

| 18.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 192/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 192/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4468 — Candover Partners/Hilding Anders)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 192/03)

On 15 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4468. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4468. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
# C_2007297EN.01001502.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 October 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Erika Hollmann v Fazenda Pública

(Case C-443/06) (1)

1

(Direct taxation - Taxation of capital gains on immovable property - Free movement of capital - Basis of assessment - Discrimination - Cohesion of the tax system)

(2007/C 297/23)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Erika Hollmann

Applicant:

Defendant: Fazenda Pública

Defendant:

Intervener: Ministério Público

Intervener:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Interpretation of Articles 12 EC, 18 EC, 39 EC, 43 EC and 56 EC — Taxation of capital gains realised on the transfer for valuable consideration of real property — Exclusion from the part exemption provided for for persons residing in Portugal of capital gains realised on such transfers made by persons residing in another Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 EC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that in dispute in the main proceedings, which subjects capital gains resulting from the transfer of immovable property situated in a Member State, in this case Portugal, where that transfer is made by a resident of another Member State, to a tax burden greater than that which would be applicable for the same type of transaction to capital gains realised by a resident of the State in which that immovable property is situated.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
Wingard Services, LLC

Raymond R Wingard Jr, Member

566 Southern Run

Fairhope, AL, 36532

(251) 331-7107

rwingard@wingardservices.com

October 9, 2015

To whom it may concern,

This petition is submitted on my behalf without legal counsel or consulting services. 

I, Raymond R Wingard Jr and sole member of Wingard Services LLC, am writing pursuant to the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333 and the 

procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, to be exempt from the Federal Aviation Regulations as specified 

and seek exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft 

System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). 

This exemption request will permit Raymond R Wingard Jr, Member, Wingard Services LLC, to operate 

UAS for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of real estate, perform home 

and or business exterior inspections, agricultural inspections, and general photography. 

Unmanned aircraft, consisting of a DJI Phantom 2 and/or DJI Phantom 3, will be used for commercial 

photography and video for hire, namely, Real Estate Photography, home and or business exterior 

inspections, wedding and events, land and survey appraisals, and agricultural assessments on local farms 

and to increase public knowledge of UAS and to promote safe UAS operations.

I was granted an FAA Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic certificate 31 years ago and am experienced 

with the above-mentioned aircraft. The DJI Phantom 2 and Phantom 3 are GPS assisted to provide very 

stable and safe flight control, and for safety these UA’s will return to home in case of signal loss or low 

battery condition. These UA’s are software limited to 400ft altitude. I will perform all pre-flight and post

flight checks, and system/vehicle maintenance in accordance with FAA and manufacturer’s instructions. 

All flights will be line of sight and will have a spotter as needed. The Phantom UA’s weigh 3 pounds and 

are battery operated.

A primary benefit is the use of these aircraft to substantially reduce the need to climb ladders and walk roof 

or other elevated surfaces. The fall risk elimination benefit is clear. The ability to provide inspection of 

elevated surfaces where personnel safety or financial burden would otherwise prevent it is a benefit to 

clients and public overall as building and property maintenance is simplified and enhanced. The aircraft are 

safer and eliminate potential damage to property by aerial trucks, scaffolds, ladders, booms etc. Where 

aircraft must be used, these UA’s can access areas a full size aircraft can't.

Sincerely, 

Raymond R Wingard Jr

Member

Wingard Services LLC
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2019

p0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2019

157996

APEX LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL

INC.,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

v SC: 157996

COA: 338218

MTT: 16

- 000724

- TT

CITY OF DETROIT,

Respondent

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of February 4, 2019, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

Henderson v Civil Serv Comm (Docket No. 156270). On order of the Court, the case

having been decided on March 15, 2019, ___ Mich ___ (2019), the application is again

considered, and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court

of Appeals for reconsideration in light of S Dakota v Wayfair, Inc, ___US ___; 138 S Ct

2080, 2099; 201 L Ed 2d 403 (2018), which overruled Quill Corp v North Dakota ex rel

Heitkamp , 504 US 298; 112 S Ct 1904; 119 L Ed 2d 91 (1992).

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The National Guard heritage: Soldiers in the sun: San Isidro, Luzon, Philippine Islands, May 6, 1899

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The National Guard heritage: Soldiers in the sun: San Isidro, Luzon, Philippine Islands, May 6, 1899 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Guard BureauNeary, Donna J. 
                    -           Description        
                    -  "NGB 87-191A"; Painting by Donna Neary 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-19901890-1900 
                    -           Country        
                    -  Philippines 
                    -           State        
                    -  Luzon 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  128 × 36 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019119387.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Case: 2:11-cv-00002-JLG-MRA Doc #: 27 Filed: 04/18/12 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00002-JLG-MRA Doc #: 27 Filed: 04/18/12 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T11:29:28-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
(Reap. Dec. 9240)

#### Leslie B. Canion *v.*United States

Entry No. 1950-H.

(Decided on rehearing [Reap. Dec. 9127] October 28, 1958)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter (Howard Clare Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

*568JOHNSON, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an .agreed statement of fact entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the invoice unit values, plus 12.44 per centum, plus the cost of packing as found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
|   | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Native American Energy Group, Inc. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 22, 2014 | By:    | /s/ Joseph G. D’Arrigo                          |   |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Joseph G. D’Arrigo                              |
|                 |   | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |

| Date: April 22, 2014 | By:    | /s/ Raj S. Nanvaan                                     |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Joseph G. D’Arrigo                               |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50535 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CESARIO MENDOZA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-98-CR-1713-1

--------------------

_________________________ Consolidated with No. 99-50633 Summary Calendar

__________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MANUEL CALDERON-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 99-CR-5-ALL

-------------------- December 17, 1999Nos. 99-50535 & 99-50633 -2-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * In this consolidated appeal, Cesario Mendoza-Martinez (Mendoza) and Manuel Calderon-Garcia (Calderon) appeal their sentences for illegally reentering the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Their sole contention is that the district court erred when it enhanced their sentences 16 levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) for their prior convictions of an aggravated felony. The aggravated felony relied upon by the district court in both cases was a felony conviction of driving while intoxicated (DWI). The appellants argue that the offense of DWI is not an aggravated felony because it is not a “crime of violence” as the term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). A sentence must be affirmed unless it was imposed in violation of the law or was based on an erroneous application of the sentencing guidelines. United States v. Galvan-Rodriguez , 169 F.3d 217, 218 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 120 S. Ct. 100 (1999). This court reviews de novo a challenge to a district court’s interpretation of the guidelines. Id. The appellants’ argument is forestalled by this court’s recent decision in Camacho-Marroquin v. INS , 188 F.3d 649 (5th Cir. 1999), in which we held that DWI constitutes a “crime of violence” as the term is defined in § 16(b). See id. at 652.Nos. 99-50535 & 99-50633 -3- Accordingly, the sentences of Mendoza and Calderon are, in all respects AFFIRMED.