alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

JERRY L. ANGELO, 

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-cv-362

Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge King 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

ORDER

On July 31, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended

that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and that the action

be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further

consideration of plaintiff’s cognitive functioning. Report and

Recommendation, Doc. No. 24. Although the parties were advised of

their right to object to the recommendation and of the consequences of

their failure to do so, there has nevertheless been no objection.

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 24, is ADOPTED AND

AFFIRMED. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the action

is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to

Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration of

plaintiff’s cognitive functioning.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT pursuant to

Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00362-ALM-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 08/28/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### H. M. Snelwar, Victory Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7502.

Entry No. 31314, etc.

Invoices dated Manchester, England, November 1943, etc.

Certified November 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 29, 1943, etc.

*351(Decided January 13, 1948)

*Abraham M Linderibaum*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in these reappraise-ments are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export values of the merchandise are the values found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the British purchase tax, so-called.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of CN Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Oliver Xing, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 12th day of August, 2011.








OLIVER XINGOliver XingChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6800]



[[Page 18230]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-200-022]


Rockies Express Pipeline LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, Rockies Express Pipeline LLC 
(REX) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be effective April 1, 
2007:

Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 22,
Second Revised Sheet No. 22A,
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 24,
First Revised Sheet No. 24A.

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b3d3e293834151712151e280e0b0b14090f3b1d1e0918551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cf898a9d8c80a1a3a6a1aa9cbabfbfa0bdbb8fa9aabdace1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6800 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
November 16, 1971

No. 71-39

#### CAPT Richard G. Peterson *658for, and on behalf of, Hubert E. Wilkins, Jr., U. S. Air Force v Commanding Officer, Second Air Force, Barksdale AFB, Louisiana and Base Commander, Dyess AFB, Texas.

On consideration of the “Request for Writ of Habeas Corpus”, respondents’ “Answer and Response to Order to Show Cause”, and petitioner’s “Reply to Response to Order to Show Cause”, it appearing that the order directing petitioner’s initial and continued confinement upon a charge of premeditated murder of a fellow airman allegedly committed at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, on or about August 29, 1971, was and is supported by probable cause as required by Article 9(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 809(d), and it further appearing that no action taken by respondents tends to impair or defeat the jurisdiction of this Court (see 28 USC § 1651 (a)), it is, by the Court, this 16th day of November 1971,

ORDERED:

That said Request be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
Exhibit 10(b)

                 CONSENT OF SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN, LLP

      We hereby consent to the reference to our firm included in the prospectus
and statement of additional information of Merrill Lynch Large Cap Growth Focus
Fund of Mercury V.I. Funds, Inc. filed as part of its Registration Statement
(File No. 333-68879) and to the use of our opinion of counsel, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 9 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form N-lA, filed on April 15, 1999.

New York, New York
April 19, 2001                          /s/ Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, LLP
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, LLP
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9158 

To require an institution of higher education that becomes aware that a 

student having nonimmigrant status under subparagraph (F)(i) or (J) 

of section 101(a)(15) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

1101(a)(15)) has endorsed or supported a foreign terrorist organization 

to notify the SEVIS, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2024 

Mr. LANGWORTHY (for himself, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. MILLS, and Mr. WEBER

of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education 

and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require an institution of higher education that becomes 

aware that a student having nonimmigrant status under 

subparagraph (F)(i) or (J) of section 101(a)(15) of the 

Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)) 

has endorsed or supported a foreign terrorist organization to notify the SEVIS, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9158 IH

1 SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION BY INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER 

2 EDUCATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—An institution of higher education 

4 shall immediately report to the SEVIS when a student 

5 holding a J–1 or F–1 nonimmigrant visa has participated 

6 in activity in support of, or as an endorsement of, a for7 eign terrorist organization. The Secretary of State shall 

8 revoke such visa if the Secretary determines that such par9 ticipation is established. In the case of a student whose 

10 visa is revoked under this section, the Secretary of Home11 land Security shall initiate removal proceedings with re12 spect to the student under the Immigration and Nation13 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.). 

14 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

15 (1) The term ‘‘foreign terrorist organization’’ 

16 means an organization designated as a foreign ter17 rorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the 

18 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). 

19 (2) The term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ 

20 means an approved institution of higher education 

21 that is subject to section 641 of the Illegal Immigra22 tion Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 

23 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1372). 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9158 IH

1 (3) The term ‘‘SEVIS’’ means the Student and 

2 Exchange Visitor Information System of the Depart3 ment of Homeland Security. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 53667.

protest 131813-K (Portland, Me.).

#### Frederick N. Stephens *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
**Exhibit
      32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**






I,
      Neil
      Smit, the President and Chief Executive Officer of CCH II, LLC and CCH II
      Capital Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
      certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission:




·
            fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934; and




·
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









/s/
      Neil
      Smit


Neil
      Smit


President
      and Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      13,
      2007
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(d) Certification

 

I, Qiong Sun, certify that:

 

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reportson Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of SATURNS Trust No.2010-01 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. 	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the ExchangeAct periodic reports;

 

4. 	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s)required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer,The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of SATURNS Trust No. 2010-01, has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement,which is the Trust Agreement relating to SATURNS Trust No. 2010-01; and

 

5. 	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report. Any material instances of noncompliance describedin such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and its officers and agents.

 

 

 

By:/s/Qiong Sun 

Name:	 QiongSun
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Peter R. Huntsman, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman LLC for the three months ended March 31, 2005;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
May 11, 2005

| |  | /s/PETER R. HUNTSMANPeter R. Huntsman Chief Executive
Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Case: 2:11-cv-00936-EAS-MRA Doc #: 48 Filed: 08/27/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T10:22:49-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Case: 2:11-cv-00271-EAS-TPK Doc #: 5 Filed: 05/05/11 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T10:50:22-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
(Reap. Dec. 8332)

#### United States *v.*Herbert B. Moller

Entry No. J-472.

(Decided September 16, 1954)

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation by the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise herein invoiced as Silvered Plate Glass, Electro-Copper Backed, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States at U. S. $0.75 per square foot, packed, less 1 *%*cash discount, less non-dutiable charges for f. o. b. expenses and ocean freight amounting to U. S. $146.67.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value, as defined in Sect. 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the merchandise involved herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

*521On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the silvered plate glass, electro-copper backed, here involved, and that such value was United States dollars 0.75 per square foot, packed, less 1 per centum cash discount, less nondutiable charges for f. o. b. expenses and ocean freight amounting to United States dollars 146.67.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

O C E A N B LV D

PA D R E B LV D O C E A N B LV D

O C E A N B LV D

PA D R E B LV D O C E A N B LV D

G U L F O F M E X I C O

L A G U N A M A D R E

G U L F O F M E X I C O

L A G U N A M A D R E

South

Padre

Island

Padre Island

Padre Island

Port

Isabel

Laguna

Vista

Three

Islands

Port

Isabel NW

North

of Port

Isabel SW

La Coma

FEET

FEET

1 400 000 FEET

97°07'30"

12'30"

10'

26°

26°

10' 07'

97° 30"

97° 97°

PQ

30"

30"

26°

12'

07'

15'

15'

12'

30" 07'

30"

15' 15'

26°

10'

PP

12'30"

10'

16 000

1 430 000FEET

16 580 000

610

6

000m

6

28

6

28

28

6

6

28

6

29

28

28

28

6

6

29

28

28

6

29

6

29

28

6 6

29

6

28

28

28

29

6

6

28

6

6

28

6

28

6

28

6 000m

000m

6 6

6

29

000m

E

29

93

95

03

03

75

99

02

N

81

92

96

80

01

98

84

79 83

04

91

86 87

94

87

77 84

97

86

99

92

97

N

81

04

E 76

96

80

01

76 78 82

85

95

77

98

78 82

85

94

91

00

PQ

PP

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2697-113

PORT ISABEL NW, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

PORT ISABEL NW QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2006

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 48 ́

14 MILS

4° 31 ́

80 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

PP

PQ 29 00

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
# C_2007315EN.01000401.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Denmark

(Case C-19/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Communities' own resources - Customs duties legally owed not recovered following an error by the national customs authorities - Financial liability of the Member States)

(2007/C 315/05)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N.B. Rasmussen, G. Wilms and H.-P. Hartvig, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Molde, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 10 EC and Articles 2 and 8 of Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom of 31 October 1994 on the system of the European Communities' own resources (OJ 1994 L 293, p. 9) — Financial responsibility of the Member States for own resources — Failure to make available to the Commission an amount of DKK 18 687 475 that the customs authorities wrongly omitted to recover as customs duties from an undertaking.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to make available to the Commission of the European Communities an amount of DKK 18 687 475 in own resources, together with default interest thereon calculated as from 27 July 2000, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law and, in particular, under Articles 2 and 8 of Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom of 31 October 1994 on the system of the European Communities' own resources; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to make available to the Commission of the European Communities an amount of DKK 18 687 475 in own resources, together with default interest thereon calculated as from 27 July 2000, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law and, in particular, under Articles 2 and 8 of Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom of 31 October 1994 on the system of the European Communities' own resources;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.

1

---
No. 56087.

protest 167212-K (New York).

#### Jura Products *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the hearing it was agreed that the circumstances surrounding the liquidation of the entry involved are similar in all material respects to those covered by the decision in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoice should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.