alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6845

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus ERROL TURNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR99-560; CA-05-1105-PJM) Submitted: February 6, 2006 Decided: February 17, 2006 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Errol Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Errol Turner appeals the district court’s order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and dismissing the motion for lack of jurisdiction. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Turner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also construe Turner’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. SeeUnited States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a movant must assert claims based on- 3 - either (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review, or (2) newly discovered evidence sufficient to establish that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ¶ 8. Turner’s claims do not satisfy either of these standards. We therefore decline to authorize a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0313[1]

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Tanya Parise" <tparise@alpha-gamma.com> 

Date: 08/19/2009 10:15AM 

cc: "Brad Nelson" <Nelson.Brad@Ecrweb.Com> 

Subject: SSM Recommendations

Melanie, 

I went through the RTC document, looked at some engine manufacturers operating manuals, 

and some other information we've gotten on the SSM issue and summarized the 

recommendations in the attachment. I was waiting to see if EMA, API, and INGAA would 

provide some more information on this topic and I would include that, but we've only heard 

back from EMA. 

Based on the information we have, for startup, it seems that specifying a time limit of 30 

minutes might be appropriate and include the provision to petition the Administrator if 

additional time is needed in special cases. 

I can formalize the information into a memo if you want. Just let me know, but I just 

wanted to get the information out to you. 

Tanya 

Tanya Parise 

Senior Chemical Engineer 

Alpha-Gamma Technologies, Inc. 

3301 Benson Drive, Suite 535 

Raleigh, NC 27609 

Phone : (919) 954-0033 ext: 109 

Fax : (919) 954-0379 

Email : tparise@alpha-gamma.com 

URL : http://www.alpha-gamma.com 

Page 1
#### Minna Eichner, Resp’t, *v.*The Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co., App’lt.

*(New York Common Pleas, General Term,*

*Filed February 3, 1890.)*

Insurance (fire)—Proof of loss.

In an action upon a policy of fire insurance some of the property for which damages were sought to be recovered was such as usually do not belong to women, and no proof was given that such articles actually belonged to plaintiff. It appeared that she had settled with another company on the terms of an appraisement made under this policy. *Brld,*that as it seems from the testimony that she did not comply with the condition of the policy as to ascertainment of the loss, or was bound by such appraisement, a reargument is ordered as to these points.

Motion for a reargument.

*Butler, Stillman & Hubbard,*for app’lt; *H. Joseph,*for resp’t

Pee Curiam.

A very simple mathematical calculation shows "that the verdict of the jury rendered in this action, and the judgment entered thereon is too large, even according to the plaintiff’s own showing. The return also shows that some of the property for which damages were sought to be recovered were not such as usually belong to women, consisting as they did of “ one gent’s blue flannel suit, one coat and vest,” and other property, and yet there was no proof in the case, as far as we have been able to discover, to show that these articles really belonged to her or were covered by the policy.

The condition of the policy relating to the ascertainment of the amount of loss or damages, unless waived, is a condition precedent of the right of plaintiff to recover. *Prest. D. & H. C. Co.*v. *Pennsylvania Coal Co.,*50 N. Y., 250. The testimony in this case, as it appears from the return, is very much confused, but it would' seem that the plaintiff either did not attempt to comply with this condition or that if she did comply she was bound by the action of the appraisers, especially in view of the fact that as to one of two companies involved in the loss, she settled upon the terms of the appraisement.

In view of these facts, we think there should be a reargument in the case.

Bookstavee and Bischoff, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. LARRY :

BERMAN, :

:

Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:11-CV-008

:

v. : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

:

PAUL LIU, et al., : Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Lou Chodosh’s Motion to Dismiss

Complaint (Doc. 31). The Defendant filed this motion on April 7, 2011, three days after this

Court issued an order dismissing the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)

(Doc. 29) and two days after the clerk’s judgment was entered (Doc. 30). Because the case has

been dismissed, the Defendant’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Algenon L. Marbley 

Algenon L. Marbley

United States District Court Judge

DATED: April 13, 2011

Case: 2:11-cv-00008-ALM-EPD Doc #: 32 Filed: 04/13/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 521-0557, the US Postal Service information hotline

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 521-0557, the US Postal Service information hotline 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Postal Service 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  192 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  020229098.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2007235EN.01002802.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/28

---

Criteria for the assignment of cases to chambers

(2007/C 235/51)

On 19 September 2007, in accordance with Article 4 of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice and Article 12 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, the Civil Service Tribunal decided to maintain in force until 30 September 2008 the following conditions for the assignment of cases to chambers:

| — | the First Chamber shall hear all cases, with the exception of those principally concerning questions of recruitment, assessment/promotion and final termination of service, which shall be heard by the Second Chamber; |
| --- | --- |

—

the First Chamber shall hear all cases, with the exception of those principally concerning questions of recruitment, assessment/promotion and final termination of service, which shall be heard by the Second Chamber;

| — | a number of cases shall be assigned to the Third Chamber, regardless of the subject-matter involved, at regular intervals to be determined at a plenary meeting of the Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

—

a number of cases shall be assigned to the Third Chamber, regardless of the subject-matter involved, at regular intervals to be determined at a plenary meeting of the Tribunal;

| — | derogations from the above rules on assignment may be made for reasons of connections between cases and to ensure a balanced and reasonably varied workload within the Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

—

derogations from the above rules on assignment may be made for reasons of connections between cases and to ensure a balanced and reasonably varied workload within the Tribunal.

---
Exhibit
10.1


 


Non-employee Director Compensation Program


 


On
June 5, 2008, the Board of Directors of Acusphere, Inc. (the “Company”)
amended its non-employee director compensation program .


 


As amended, the Company’s non-employee director compensation program is
as follows:


 


Non-employee
directors receive an annual retainer for board membership of $20,000 and an
annual retainer for each committee membership of $5,000, in each case payable
quarterly. Annual retainer payments are pro-rated based upon days of service in
the event a non-employee director joins or leaves the board of directors (or
any committee thereof) during any calendar year.  Non-employee directors also receive a fee of
$2,000 for each board or committee meeting attended in person and a fee of $600
for each board or committee meeting attended via telephone conference call,
provided that the cumulative amount of such meeting fees shall not exceed $2,000
per day. Non-employee directors may elect to receive their annual retainers in
the form of cash or shares of our common stock with any such issuances of our
common stock based on the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global
Market (or other applicable securities exchange or trading market) on the date
of issuance.


 


In
addition, each non-employee director will receive on an annual basis an option
to purchase 47,500 shares of our common stock, in each case effective
immediately following our annual meeting of stockholders. These options will
vest in equal monthly installments over a one year period based upon continued
service on the board of directors. Upon their initial election or appointment
to the Board of Directors, non-employee directors receive an option to purchase
84,000 shares of our common stock, subject to vesting in equal monthly
installments over a four year period based upon continued service on the board
of directors.


 


In
addition, (i) the chairperson of the compensation committee will receive
on an annual basis on option to purchase 7,500 shares of our common stock, (ii) the
chairperson of the nominating and corporate governance committee will receive
on an annual basis an option to purchase 6,000 shares of our common stock, (iii) the
chairperson of the audit committee will receive an option to purchase 12,000
shares of our common stock, and (iv) the presiding director of the board
of directors will receive on an annual basis an option to purchase 15,000
shares of our common stock. Each of the foregoing options will vest in equal
monthly installments over a one year period based upon continued service on the
board of directors.


 


All
directors will reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred on our behalf,
and all of the directors are eligible to participate in the 2003 Stock Option
and Incentive Plan and Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan on an ad hoc basis from time to time at the discretion of the Board of
Directors.
UNITED
STATES

SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549



|FORM 8-K
|--------

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934

Date
of Report: May 14, 2004



|(Date of Earliest
      Event Reported)
|---------------------------------------

CARTOON ACQUISITION, INC.

(Exact Name of
Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



Delaware
    
    000-50411
    
    20-0269287(State or Other
      Jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (I. R. S.
      EmployerOf
      Incorporation)
    
    File
      Number)
    
    Identification
      Number)24300 Chagrin BoulevardSuite 210Cleveland, Ohio
    
    44122(Address of
      Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip
      Code)


Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code:

(216)
514-5997

---

ITEM
5. OTHER EVENTS AND REQUIRED FD DISCLOSURE.

Effective at the close of business on May 14, 2004, Cartoon
Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company") has implemented a reverse stock split by
converting each block of 1,240,000 shares of its common stock, par value $.0001
per share (the "Common Stock"), issued and outstanding as of such date into one
share of Common Stock.

The
Company's sole director and sole stockholder approved the reverse stock split on
May 14, 2004. The Company has implemented the reverse stock split at the ratio
of 1-for-1,240,000, causing each outstanding block of 1,240,000 shares of the
Common Stock to automatically convert into one share of Common Stock and
reducing the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding from approximately
1,240,000 to one. The par value of the Company's Common Stock will remain at
$.0001 per share and the number of authorized shares will remain at 100,000,000
shares of Common Stock.

ITEM
7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

|(a) | Financial Statements of Business Acquired. Not
      Applicable.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | Pro
      forma Financial Information. Not Applicable.          
|   
|(c) | Exhibits. None.                                                 
|   



|SIGNATURES
|----------

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



|CARTOON ACQUISITION,
INC.
|-------------------------



---
No. 55382.

#### Capital Cigar & Liquor Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 120754-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8581 

To amend the Small Business Act to provide for cancellation or repayment 

for certain Small Business Administration disaster loans, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 31, 2024 

Ms. BROWNLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to provide for cancellation 

or repayment for certain Small Business Administration 

disaster loans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disaster Loan Forgive5 ness Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8581 IH

1 SEC. 2. CANCELLATION OR REPAYMENT FOR CERTAIN 

2 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION DIS3 ASTER LOANS. 

4 Section 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

5 636(b)) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating the second paragraph (16) 

7 (relating to statute of limitations) as paragraph 

8 (17); and 

9 (2) by inserting after paragraph (17), as so re10 designated, the following new paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(17) CANCELLATION OR REPAYMENT FOR

12 CERTAIN LOANS.— 

13 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator 

14 may cancel or repay an amount described under 

15 subparagraph (B) of the balance of interest and 

16 principal due on a loan made under paragraph 

17 (1)(A) for a borrower described in such sub18 paragraph. 

19 ‘‘(B) AMOUNTS.—The amounts described 

20 under this paragraph are as follows: 

21 ‘‘(i) With respect to borrower who is 

22 an individual— 

23 ‘‘(I) with an income less than or 

24 equal to 400 percent of the poverty 

25 line applicable to the borrower’s fam26 ily size as determined in accordance 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8581 IH

1 with section 673(2) of the Community 

2 Services Block Grant Act, 100 percent 

3 of such balance; and 

4 ‘‘(II) with an income greater 

5 than 400 percent of such poverty line 

6 and less than $250,000, 50 percent of 

7 such balance. 

8 ‘‘(ii) With respect to a borrower that 

9 is a small business concern or a small non10 profit organization (as defined by the Ad11 ministrator), not more than 50 percent of 

12 such balance.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### S. P. Skinner Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6357.

Entry No. 98152/3, etc.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, May 5, 1941, etc.

Certified May 26, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 23, 1941, etc.

(Decided September 19, 1946)

*Lane & Wallace*and *Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Order of precedence-- U.S. Marine Corps.

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Order of precedence-- U.S. Marine Corps. 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Marine Corps 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Marine Corps 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Rev. 1990. Caption title. Shipping list no.: 91-152-P. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Marine Corps 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  144 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -