alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 65638.

#### Frazar & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/23320, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7333.

Invoice dated London, England, February 19, 1946.

Certified February 23, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 8, 1946.

Entry No. 743835.

(Decided July 11, 1947)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*214Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Experimental forests and ranges

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Experimental forests and ranges 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Forest Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Pacific Northwest Research Station 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  2000-2010 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 92 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  PostersMaps 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  index.cpd 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489533 

Part of: Experimental forests and ranges (2 objects)     Next

Experimental forests and ranges

Experimental forests and ranges

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
**Exhibit 12.1****RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES****(in thousands)**                   **Three Months**      **Ended**  **Year Ended**   **March 31, 2006**  **2005**  **2004**  **2003** Earnings:                Loss from continuingoperations $(805) $(2,422) $(3,157) $(429)Add: Fixed charges  3,803   10,180   2,752   1,197 Less: Capitalizedinterest  (197)  (479)  —   —              Earnings $2,801  $7,279  $(405) $768                               Fixed charges:                Interest expense $3,403  $9,345  $2,481  $1,189 Capitalizedinterest  197   479   —   — Amortization of deferred financingfees  203   356   271   8              Fixed charges $3,803  $10,180  $2,753  $1,197                               Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(1)(2)  —   —   —   —  (1)The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividingearnings by fixed charges. For this purpose, earnings consist of netincome from continuing operations plus fixed charges less capitalizedinterest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, capitalized interestand amortization of deferred financing fees. (2)The shortfall of earnings to fixed charges for the three monthsended March 31, 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and2003 was $1.0 million, $2.9 million, $3.2 million and $0.4 million,respectively.
20
EXHIBIT 32

                           Section 1350 Certifications

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned  officers of
         TransNet  Corporation (the "Company")  hereby certify to such officer's
         knowledge that:

     1)   The  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q of the  Company  for the  fiscal
          quarter ended December 31, 2003,  fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The  information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial conditions and results of operations
          of the Company.

         /S/ STEVEN J. WILK
         ------------------
         Steven J. Wilk
         Chief Executive Officer

          Date:  February 13, 2004

         /S/ JOHN J, WILK
         ------------------
         John J. Wilk
         Chief Financial Officer

         Date:  February 13, 2004
(Reap. Dec. 10224)

#### Paragon Organic Chemicals Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 707096.

(Decided April 17, 1962)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*'William S. Orrich, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise embraced in the entry covered by the above numbered appeal for reappraisement and exported from England on or about June 20th, 1961, consists in fact of glutaric acid, a non-coal-tar product or derivative; that said merchandise is not on the list of products from which the application of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress) (T.D. 54521) is withheld.

> IT IS EURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing appraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for *622exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoice value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that this appeal be submitted on this stipulation. -

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value for the merchandise covered by this appeal is represented by the invoice value herein.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Practitioner education: a program for tax professionals

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Practitioner education: a program for tax professionals 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Rev. 4-98. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Publication ; 3000; Publication (United States. Internal Revenue Service) ; 3000. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  039555092.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,807,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,444,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,827,404
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,502,645
<PP&E>                                         462,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,541,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,350,111
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        74,395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,117,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,541,920
<SALES>                                     17,454,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,454,435
<CGS>                                       15,582,064
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,545,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (13,657)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                289,981
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            289,981
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   289,981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
May 21, 2015 

Mr. Kevin Cooper 

Revealing Homes, LLC 

705 Powers Ferry Road, #415 

Marietta, GA 30067 

Dear Mr. Cooper: 

This is in response to your March 10, 2015, letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2015-0588) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Revealing Homes, LLC 

(Revealing Homes) for an exemption. You requested to operate an unmanned aircraft system 

to conduct aerial photography for real estate. 

By letter dated April 1, 2015, which posted to the docket April 10, the FAA sent you a 

rejection letter asking you to provide the following information: 

 The specific section or sections of the Title 14 Code of Regulations (14 CFR) from 

which you sought relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the 

exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule 

from which you sought an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

In your response, posted to the docket on April 16, 2015, you failed to cite the specific 

regulations from which you sought relief, provide an adequate response for how your 

exemption would benefit the public, and justify how your exemption would not adversely 

affect safety. 

 
2

Because your petition does not meet the requirement of 14 CFR § 11.81, the FAA has 

closed your request. Should you reapply, you may submit a new petition for exemption to the 

public docket. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Lirio Liu 

Director 

Office of Rulemaking
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,059
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                       686
<INVENTORY>                                      7,867
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,212
<PP&E>                                          16,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,547
<BONDS>                                         12,328
<COMMON>                                         2,526
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,704
<SALES>                                         71,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,104
<CGS>                                           62,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                       532
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                961
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       961
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT: RESIDENTIAL CLOTHES DRYERS AND ROOM AIR CONDITIONERS

CHAPTERS

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2 ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK CHAPTER 3 MARKET AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 4 SCREENING ANALYSIS CHAPTER 5 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CHAPTER 6 MARKUPS FOR EQUIPMENT PRICE DETERMINATION CHAPTER 7 ENERGY AND WATER USE DETERMINATION CHAPTER 8 LIFE-CYCLE COST AND PAYBACK PERIOD ANALYSIS CHAPTER 9 SHIPMENTS ANALYSIS CHAPTER 10 NATIONAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CHAPTER 11 LIFE-CYCLE COST SUB-GROUP ANALYSIS CHAPTER 12 PRELIMINARY MANUFACTURER IMPACT ANALYSIS CHAPTER 13 UTILITY IMPACT ANALYSIS CHAPTER 14 EMPLOYMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS CHAPTER 15 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 16 REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS

APPENDICES

APPENDIX 5A DRAFT ENGINEERING AN ALYSIS DATA REQUEST SHEETS APPENDIX 5B DATA SUBMITTAL APPENDIX 5C ENGINEERING QUESTIONNAIRES APPENDIX 5D ROOM AIR CONDITIONER ENGINEERING DATA APPENDIX 6A DETAILED DATA FOR PRODUCT COST MARKUPS APPENDIX 7A RECS 2005 VARIABLES AND VALUES APPENDIX 7B CBECS 2003 VARIABLES AND VALUES APPENDIX 7C LCC ENERGY USE CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 7D WEATHER DATA AND TEMPERATURE PARAMETERS APPENDIX 8A USER INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS SPREADSHEET APPENDIX 8B UNCERTAINTY AND VARIABILITY APPENDIX 8C LIFETIME DISTRIBUTIONS APPENDIX 8D DISTRIBUTIONS USED FOR DISCOUNT RATES APPENDIX 8E TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE TARIFF-BASED APPROACH FOR ROOM AIR CONDITIONER ENERGY PRICES APPENDIX 8F DEVELOPMENT OF MONTHLY ALLOCATION FACTORS FOR RESIDENTIAL BASELINE ENERGY USE APPENDIX 8G REBUTTABLE PAYBACK ANALYSIS RESULTS APPENDIX 8H DETERMINATION OF BASE-CASE EFFICIENCY DISTRIBUTIONS APPENDIX 9A USER INSTRUCTIONS FOR SHIPMENTS AND NATIONAL ENERGY

TOC-iSAVINGS SPREADSHEET MODEL APPENDIX 9B 	 NATIONAL ENERGY SA VINGS AND NET PRESENT VALUE USING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY PRICE SCENARIOS APPENDIX 12A PRELIMINARY MANUFACTURING IMPACT ANALYSIS QUESTIONNAIRES

TOC-ii
# C_2007269EN.01006301.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/63

---

Action brought on 13 September 2007 — Ester v OHIM — Coloris Global Coloring Concept (COLORIS)

(Case T-353/07)

(2007/C 269/114)

Language in which the application has been drafted: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Esber, S.A. (Vizcaya, Spain) (Represented by: J.A. Calderón Chavero and T. Villate Consonni and A. Yañez Manglano, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Coloris Global Coloring Concept, S.A.S.

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Forms of order sought

| — | Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM issued on 28 June 2007 in Case R-1060/2006-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM issued on 28 June 2007 in Case R-1060/2006-1;

| — | Consequently, upholding the decision of the Board of Appeal, dismiss the opposition filed and proceed to grant the contested trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

Consequently, upholding the decision of the Board of Appeal, dismiss the opposition filed and proceed to grant the contested trade mark;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs of the present proceedings if it contests them and reject its claims. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs of the present proceedings if it contests them and reject its claims.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community Trade Mark: The applicant.

Applicant for the Community Trade Mark:

Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark containing the word ‘COLORIS’ (application no 2.817.732) for goods in Class 2.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in opposition proceedings: COLORIS GLOBAL COLORING CONCEPT, S.A.S.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: French national word mark ‘COLORIS’ for goods in Class 2 (no 98/717642).

Mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejected the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Christine Marais,

Plaintiff

 v.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor

by merger to Chase Home Finance

LLC,

Defendant

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:11-cv-0314

Judge Smith

Magistrate Judge Abel

Discovery Conference Order

On March 2, 2012, counsel for the parties participated in a scheduling dispute conference with the Magistrate Judge. 

Plaintiff requested a 14-day extension of time to respond to defendant’s February 13

motion for judgment on the pleadings. Defendant would not agree unless the deposi-tion

of its Rule 30(b)(6) witness was moved from March 22 to a date at least 14 days later.

While the timing of discovery can sometimes be important, the timing of the Rule

30(b)(6) deposition was not raised as an issue by defendant until plaintiff requested an

extension of time to respond to the motion for judgment on the pleadings . In any event, a

requested extension of time to file a brief should not be held hostage to an unrelated

request by the opposing party. Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to extend the time to 

Case: 2:11-cv-00314-GCS-MRA Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/02/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2

respond to defendant’s February 13 motion for judgment on the pleadings to and

including March 22, 2012 is GRANTED. 

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00314-GCS-MRA Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/02/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>