alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John R. Bailey, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Global Energy Group,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 29, 2004 /s/ John R. BaileyJohn R. BaileyPresident, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. Hogan Lovells refers to the international legal practice comprising Hogan Lovells US LLP, Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells Worldwide Group (a Swiss Verein), and their affiliated businesses with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Boulder Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb \\DC - 036787/000001 - 3351700 v1 Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 T +1 202 637 5600 F +1 202 637 5910 www.hoganlovells.com January 13, 2012 Via Electronic Mail Mr. Paul L. Gretch Director, Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Request of Frontier Airlines, Inc. for a Designation (Kansas City- San Jose del Cabo) Dear Mr. Gretch: Frontier Airlines, Inc. (“Frontier”) holds certificate authority for the Kansas City-San Jose del Cabo route, which is currently limited to code-sharing service. 1 Frontier respectfully requests immediate conversion of its code-share authorization for the Kansas City-San Jose del Cabo route to a designation so that it may operate its own aircraft on this route during the current peak winter period, and on a seasonal basis going forward. 2 Unused U.S. airline designations remain available for this route. Frontier is conducting a poll of the U.S. carrier representatives listed below regarding this designation request and will promptly notify the Department of the results. Respectfully submitted,

Robert E. Cohn Patrick R. Rizzi Counsel for Frontier Airlines, Inc. cc: Docket DOT-OST-2005-22228; bob.kneisley@wnco.com; msinick@ssd.com; carl.nelson@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; jeff.morgan@delta.com; jhill@dowlohnes.com; jyoung@yklaw.com; dkirstein@yklaw.com; john.fredericksen@suncountry.com; dan.weiss@united.com; howard_kass@usairways.com; pmurphy@lopmurphy.com; barbara.russell@virginamerica.com; brian.hedberg@dot.gov; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov; brett.kruger@dot.gov

1 See DOT Order 2011-6-12, Appendix B.

2 Frontier anticipates it will also continue to offer seasonal code-share service on this route on flights operated by its affiliate Republic Airline Inc.
r. 

365 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

SR,,VERSELLERS 

*TT*RNCY GENERAL 
1:. 

f, 

:p&mblo Qetmgo 11. Swppald, ?ago 2 

I 

be ~4,7soxwroar, lfhlahrrrtba8amttb 

Cou?kt Atterm@ at Xavarro Oounty oculd dm 

far tL p8bs lh5. 

‘X etull thank you to rdvler Uiir dopa+ 

Rant tho oerreot or- tho C~,Attawy at 

Ervanro Qowlti~ ir wlthorlwd to me;*, t thla 

tlm, a nd thb oorrool at o uIult p o rn h iot h 0 kk 

titb oblfgatldna o f th b fitat.." 

~~edu~~&~UlotlD(IanA 

Y 

t 24, 1935 vlth nt*reno~ to 

amow% allow3 8w &tlaom rrd raid ABt~lo prorldw that the mlnfaum rhould not be 1.8~ thm the fatal l UR 

oarntlwtwlngr population of 20,WOlnbabitmtr ormm,and 

1088 than 190,000 l&abltnntr aoaordinu to the lart?edor81 Cbn8~8 8h0~ld bb fixed rw thb par 1945, 88 provided b7 lbv uirtlng on Augi8$ 24, 1935, lW@Wd1e88 of the pvpulrtiar of ruoh 

oeuntior a. rhwn w the 1940 FedemlCer.sm. In rapport of thb 

for#(O$ng 8trtament, VI dlrwt CUP 8ttentioc to th4 oale8 or 

llroogdooher Oounty v. Jew, I 40 8. w. (2d) 901 end Plaoogdooher
No. 50582.

#### Protests 54082-K, etc., of Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co., et al. (New York).

*293Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the ease within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 52731.

protests 68491-K, etc. (New York).

#### Wm. H. Plummer & Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with' stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D, 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange fox poundo sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the'collector on each of the entries involved.
# C_2007269EN.01005702.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/57

---

Action brought on 11 September 2007 — Juwel Aquarium v OHIM — Potschak — Bavaria Aquaristik (Panorama)

(Case T-339/07)

(2007/C 269/103)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Juwel Aquarium GmbH & Co. KG (Rotenburg, Germany) (represented by: D. Jestaedt and G. Rother, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Christian Potschak — Bavaria Aquaristik

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 June 2007 (R 214/2006-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 June 2007 (R 214/2006-1);

| — | Reject the application for a declaration of invalidity of the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal in respect of the Community trade mark ‘Panorama’ (Community trade mark 2 771 087); |
| --- | --- |

—

Reject the application for a declaration of invalidity of the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal in respect of the Community trade mark ‘Panorama’ (Community trade mark 2 771 087);

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘Panorama’ for goods in Classes 11, 16 and 20 (Community trade mark 2 771 087).

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Christian Potschak — Bavaria Aquaristik.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Cancellation Division and in part of the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), since the Community trade mark ‘Panorama’ is not purely descriptive. In addition, pursuant to Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94, the indication ‘Panorama’ has not become customary and a mere generic term.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 8347)

#### M. V. Jenkins *v.*United States

Entry No. 692-K, etc.

(Decided October 21, 1954)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows concerning the merchandise referred to below:

> 1) The merchandise covered by these appeals consists of firebrick imported from Canada and invoiced with descriptions the same as those set forth in paragraph 2 below.

> 2) At the time of exportation neither a foreign value, an export value, nor a United States value existed for such or similar merchandise, and the cost of production for the imported merchandise, in Canadian dollars per 1,000 pieces, was as given below less 10 percent:

> 1-1-43 to 11-18-46 11-19-46 to 8-14-47 8-15-47 to 2-29-48 3-1-48 to 12-31-48

> Straights or squares_ 61. 00 70. 00 80. 00 85. 00

> Side arch, end wedge, necks, soaps, jambs, keys, feather edge, splits 1%, *1%*and 2"_ 61. 00 70. 00 80. 00 85. 00

> Tongue and groove, groove only_ 63. 50 72. 50 82. 50 87. 50

> Splits *}i, %*and 1"_ 64, 00 73. 00 83. 00 88. 00

> Circles and skews_ 70. 00 79. 00 89. 00 94 00

> Large straights, large end wedge, “E” blocks, flatbacks_ 91.50 105.00 115.00 127.50

> *5333) The appeals are abandoned as to all merchandise except that invoiced under the descriptions given in paragraph 2 and upon this stipulation the appeals enumerated in attached schedule may be deemed to be submitted.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise described below, and that such values, for the merchandise exported during the periods specified, were as follows:

> Canadian dollars per 1,000 pieces

> Jan. 1, 1943, to Nov. 18, 1946 Nov. 19, 1946, to Aug. 14, 1947 Aug. 15, 1947, to Feb'. 29, 1948 Mar. 1, 1948, to Dee. 31, 1948

> Straights or squares_ 61. 00 70. 00 80. 00 85. 00

> Side arch, end wedge, necks, soaps, jambs, keys, feather edge, splits *V/i, 1%*and 2"_ 61. 00 70. 00 80. 00 85. 00

> Tongue and groove, groove only_ 63. 60 72. 50 82. 50 87. 50

> Splits H, *%*and 1"_ 64. 00 73. 00 83. 00 88. 00

> Circles and skews_ 70. 00 79. 00 89. 00 94.00

> Large straights, large end wedge, “E” blocks, flatbacks_ 91.50 105. 00 115.00 127.50

> All less 10 per centum

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                period ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of 355, Inc. |

| By:    | */s/*   *Alex                Jen*Alex                JenChief                Executive OfficerChief                Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# C_2007246EN.01004301.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/43

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4825 — SFR/Somart/Débitel France)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 246/11)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 20 September 2007, the Commission of the European Communities received notification of a proposed concentration between SFR SA (France), Somart (France) and Débitel France. On 15 October 2007, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          69,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,270,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,417,000
<PP&E>                                         627,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 369,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,691,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          465,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    126,000
<COMMON>                                       453,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     469,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,691,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,732,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,508,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                209,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            158,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Jan Popovoc, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HealthMed Services LTD. (the “Registrant”);





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and





6. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  August 23, 2010








By: _/s/John Jan Popovic_____


John Jan Popovic - President, Secretary, Treasurer,


Chief Financial Officer, principal accounting officer,


principal financial officer and Director
No. 38972.

#### Protests 302210-G, etc., of Globe Shipping Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained. *Rice*v. *United States*(T. D. 49373) cited.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7471

ANTHONY R. SAVAGE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1874-H) Submitted: July 28, 1998 Decided: August 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roland Walker, WALKER, VAN BAVEL, AMARAL & MEAD, P.A., Baltimore,Maryland; Kreg Paul Greer, GREER & KENNEDY, L.L.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Anthony R. Savage seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), as untimely. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Savage’sconviction became final prior to the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, so his habeas corpus petition, filed after April 23, 1997, was untimely. See Brown v. Angelone , ___ F.3d ___ (No. 96-7173) (4th Cir. July 14, 1998). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Savage v. Corcoran , No. CA-97-1874-H (D. Md. Sept. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED