alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6688.

Entry No. 758661, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, April 1946, etc.

Certified April 2, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 7, 1946, etc.

(Decided December 30, 1946)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 31.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Randal W. Scott, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Invitae Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 27, 2015

/s/ RANDAL W. SCOTT, PH.D. Randal W. Scott, Ph.D. Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.02





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED UNDER RULE 13(a)-14(a) AND 15(d)-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED





I, Brian McGee, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of GoPro, Inc.;


2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;








Date:May 25, 2017/s/ Brian McGeeBrian McGeeChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v HARRY L. SHOWALTER, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

16 USCMA 487, 37 CMR 107

No. 19,783

January 27, 1967

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Major David J. Passamanech,*and *Captain Gerald F. Rickman*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel Peter S. Wondolowshi, Lieutenant Colonel Francis M. Cooper,*s-nd *Captain Louren R. Wood*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States,

*488Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

For the reasons set out in our opinion in United States v Robbins, 16 USCMA 474, 37 CMR 94, petition for reconsideration denied January 20, 1967, the decision of the board of review is reversed. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered,
Case *No. 8,554.*

#### LOVERING v. HEARD.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 349.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Oct., 1806.

Costs — Counties op Distiiict of Columbia.

A resident of Alexandria, suing in Washington, must give security for costs.

LoveriDg lives in Alexandria. Motion for a rule on the plaintiff to give security for costs. Granted, after consideration of the laws of Maryland on that subject. Alexandria county is to this county as a separate state, governed by different laws, although under one jurisdiction. Execution will not run from one county into the other. The marshal cannot distrain in Alexandria, for fees due to the officers in Washington county. The modes of collecting fees are different. Rule granted.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Does your county look like the dark side of the moon?

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Does your county look like the dark side of the moon? 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  164 × 49 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018196901.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MARK E. HURST,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-CV-1090 

 Judge Smith

Magistrate Judge King

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION

AND CORRECTION, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

On December 7, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended

that the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction be dismissed

as a defendant. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 6. Although

plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and

Recommendation and of the consequences of his failure to do so, there

has been no objection.

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 6, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction is DISMISSED as a

defendant in this action. 

The action will proceed as against all other defendants.

 s/George C. Smith George C. Smith, Judge

 United States District Court

Case: 2:11-cv-01090-GCS-NMK Doc #: 8 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
J.

conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J. Hardesty J.

cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge Lamarr Rowell Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 

### e
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 2, 2010 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with
the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2010-B (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial
Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS Sensub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from August 2, 2010 through
December 31, 2010, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                 |  | 
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/James Fehleison              |  |  |  | Dated: March 28, 2011
|                                     |  | James Fehleison                 |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9034 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the salary of the Director of 

the United States Secret Service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2024 

Ms. BOEBERT (for herself, Mr. BURCHETT, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, and Mr. POSEY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the salary of the 

Director of the United States Secret Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secret Service Ac5 countability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FEDERAL FUNDS FOR SALARY OF 

7 SECRET SERVICE DIRECTOR. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed9 eral funds may be obligated or expended for the salary 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9034 IH

1 or expenses of Kimberly Cheatle, the Director of the 

2 United States Secret Service. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 35.1

Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon,
as Trustee.

I, James W. P. Hall, Vice President of The Bank of New
York Mellon, a New York corporation (the “Trustee”), states:

(a) A review of the Trustee’s activities for the period
from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Trustee’s performance under
the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated July 15, 2010 between MS Structured Asset Corp. as depositor (the “Depositor”)
and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary, in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor and
the Trustee (as amended in each such case, the “Trust Agreement”), has been made under my supervision.

(b) To the best of my knowledge and based on such review,
the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period
for CMT Linked Trust Units Series 2010-01.



The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee



|Date: March 06, 2017 |  | By: /s/ James W. Hall
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                     |  | Name:  James W. Hall 
|                     |  | Title: Vice President
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Count us in! April 1, 1990, it's easy, it's important, it's confidential

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Count us in! April 1, 1990, it's easy, it's important, it's confidential 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 89-836-P. D-3304. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Bureau of the Census 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  152 × 39 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00194-CR

RONALD GENE KIMBRELL,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-1200-C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant seeks to appeal the trial court’s denial of his “motion for a true and 

correct copy of trial records.”

This court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when 

expressly granted by law. Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386 (Tex. App.—

Waco 2002, no pet.). No statute vests this court with jurisdiction over an 

appeal from an order denying a request for a free copy of the trial record 

when such a request is not presented in conjunction with a timely filed 

direct appeal. Id.; see Self v. State, 122 S.W.3d 294, 294-95 (Tex. App.—

Eastland 2003, no pet.).

Clegg v. State, 214 S.W.3d 671 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, no pet.).
Kimbrell v. State Page 2

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 20, 2012

Do not publish

[CR25]
(Reap. Dec. 8361)

#### Pipeline Products Corp. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 2084; 2788.

(Decided December 1, 1954)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a reappraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. Counsel for defendant moved to dismiss said appeals on the gound of lack of prosecution.

Rule 5 of the rules of this court provides in part:

> * * * Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it shall be deemed submitted and shall be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

In conformity with the requirements of the above-quoted rule, I have examined the papers in these appeals for a reappraisement and find nothing therein contained which would disturb the presumption of correctness attaching to the appraiser’s action.

The motion of defendant to dismiss the appeals for lack of prosecution is denied, and I find and hold the proper values of the merchandise in issue to be the values found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 44165.

#### Protest 828662-G of Nolan Hat Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Bbown, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314) the wool hoods in question were held dutiable at 33 cents per pound and 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1115 (a) as claimed.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
M IGUEL ANGEL M OR ALES, Pe titione r,
v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-71600 Age n c y No. A072-535-519
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d April 29, 2013 ** B e fore : HUG, FAR

R IS, an d LEAVY, C irc uit Judge s. Pe titione r M i gue l Ange l M ora le s (“ M o ra le s” ), a native and c itiz e n of Guate m a la , pe titions for re vie w of a de c ision from

the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls (“ B IA” ) in whic h the B IA dism isse d his a ppe a l from

the im m igrat ion judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) a dve rse c re d ibility finding a nd de nia l of re lie f in the form of de fe rra l



# FIL ED
AUG 13 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).of re m ova l unde r the C onve ntion Aga inst Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion

unde r 8 U.S.C
. § 1252(a ), and we de ny the pe tition for re vie w. 1 Whe n the B IA issue s its own de c ision, while e m pha siz ing c e rta i n a spe c ts of the IJ’ s de c ision, this c ourt re vie ws both de c isions. Morgan v . Muk ase y ,529 F.3d 1202, 1206 (9th C ir. 2008). W e re vie w le ga l que stions de novo a nd re v ie w fa c tua l findings, inc luding a dve rse c re dibility de te rm inations, for substa ntia l e vide nc e . Lope z-C ardona v . Holde r , 662 F.3d 1110, 1111 (9th C i r. 2011). Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s a dve rse c re dibility de te rm i nation. First, it prope rly re lie d on inc onsiste nc ie s be twe e n M ora l e s’ s te stim ony and his written a

pplic ation re ga

rding the loc ation of the be ating, whe re on his body

he wa s hit, whe the r or not gunshots we re fire d, a nd if the polic e a ske d him to ga the r inform ation or to just disa ppe ar. S e e Shre stha v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 1034, 1046-47 (9th C ir. 2010). B e c a use the re c ord doe s not c om pe l the c onc lusion that M ora le s is c re dible , we uphold the a ge nc y ’ s c re dibility de te rm ination. Se e Rizk v . Holde r , 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9th C ir. 2011). M ora le s’ s c la im for re lie f fa ils be c a u se the a ge nc y prope rly

found tha

t he
wa s not c re dible and c o uld not sa tisfy his burde n

of proof. Se e id. W e the re fore

1 B e c a use the pa rtie s a re fam ilia r with the fa c ts unde rly ing this a p pe a l, we do not re c ount thefa c ts he re . 2de c line to re a c h M ora le s’ s argum e nts on them e rits. Se e I.N .S. v . Bagamasbad

, 429 U.S. 24, 25 (1976) (“ As a ge ne ra l rule c ourts a

nd a ge nc ie s a

re not re quire d to
m ake findings on issue s the de c ision of whic h is unne c e ssa ry to the re sults the y re a c h.” ). PE T IT IO N DE NIE D.

3