alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,443
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                       175
<INVENTORY>                                      4,702
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,904
<PP&E>                                          11,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,994
<BONDS>                                          5,720
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,628
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,957
<SALES>                                         11,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,744
<CGS>                                           10,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   123
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,272)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (38)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     348
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (886)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 50512 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Roman Alvarado, Jr.,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:22

- CR

- 22

- 1

**___________________ ___________**  Before **Stewart, Dennis,** and **Willett,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Ramon Alvarado, Jr., pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine , in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(A) . The district court sentenced him to 180 months of imprisonment and five year s of supervised release.

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50512 Document: 00516771755 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2023No. 22

- 50512

2 For the first time on appe al, Alvarado challenges the condition of his supervised release which provides that, if the probation officer determines that Alvarado presents a risk to another person, the probation officer may require Alvarado to notify the person of that risk and may c ontact the person to confirm that notification occurred. Alvarado contends that this condition constitutes an improper delegation of judicial authority to the probation officer. He concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Mejia

- Banegas , 32 F.4th 450 (5th Cir. 2022), but he raises the issue to preserve it for further review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance, asserting that Alvarado ’s claim is foreclosed by Mejia

- Banegas

. In the alternative, the Government requests an extension of time to file its brief.
We held in Mejia

- Banegas that such a r isk

- notification condition did not impermissibly delegate judicial authority, plainly or otherwise. 32 F.4th at 451

- 52. The parties are thus correct that the issue is foreclosed, and the Government is correct that summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , the district court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED** , and the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief i s **DENIED**

. Case: 22-50512 Document: 00516771755 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHDULE CONTIANS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE STATEMENT
OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS AS OF SEP-30-1996 AND THE STATEMENT OF
DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEP-30-1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,582,968
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,582,968
<PP&E>                                      28,267,655
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,329,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,521,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          590,417
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     938,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,521,557
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               807,726
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               217,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                590,417
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   590,417
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .124
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .124

</TABLE>
Case: 2:11-cv-00400-EAS-EPD Doc #: 51 Filed: 11/06/12 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T17:28:41-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# C_2007226EN.01000101.xml

| 26.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 September 2007

(2007/C 226/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4106 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 161,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4561 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70035 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2181 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6488 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,14 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8060 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,554 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,64 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7058 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7710 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3923 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,151 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7405 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6339 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4137 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9567 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9230 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1173 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 299,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8883 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,5953 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2949 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 931,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8482 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,724 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,2610 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,066 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4106

JPY

Japanese yen

161,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4561

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70035

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2181

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6488

ISK

Iceland króna

88,14

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8060

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,554

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,64

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7058

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7710

RON

Romanian leu

3,3923

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,151

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7405

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6339

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4137

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9567

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9230

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1173

KRW

South Korean won

1 299,23

ZAR

South African rand

9,8883

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,5953

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2949

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 931,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8482

PHP

Philippine peso

63,724

RUB

Russian rouble

35,2610

THB

Thai baht

45,066

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
No. 43012.

#### Protests 956678-G, etc., of Katen & Katen, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

The protests were submitted without evidence in support of the claims made. On the records presented they were overruled.
#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6673. Entry No. 728067, etc.

Invoices dated Bury, Lancashire, England, October 22, 1941, etc.

Certified October 27, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 4, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 26, 1946)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 65630.

#### Old Importers, Inc., and Teigh, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/25277 and 60/25282 (New York).

*483Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fiber or hemp articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63552, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
## Dt5r-6£.T-iq^(/-ifi l 

# Maniste e Count y Blacke r Airpor t Authorit y

Jul y13,201 0 Denni s DeVan y Chief , Essentia l Ai rServic e Division
. X-5 3 Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U
. S
. Departmen t o f TranspOflatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse yAvenu e S E Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 Dea rMr
. DeVany , A t it s regularl yschedule d meetin g o n Jul y12'' , 2010 , th e Maniste e Count yBlacke r Airpor t Authorit yme t t o revie w th e bid s fo rEssentia l Ai rSen/ic e a t Manistee , Ml
. Afte r discussin g th e merit s o f eac h proposa l th e Maniste e Count yBlacke rAirpor t Authorit y vote d unanimousl yt o recommen d th e bi d o f Charte rAi rTranspor t fo rservic e t o Milwauke e wit h EMB-12 0 aircraft
. Whil e bot h Sovereig n Ai ran d Charte rAi rTranspor t ar e ne w entrant s fo rprovidin g Essentia l Ai rServic e i t wa s clea rt o th e boar d tha t Charte rAi rTranspor t i s i n a muc h bette rpositio n t o provid e th e servic e the yar e bidding , Charte rAi rTranspor t ha s alread ybee n activel yworkin g wit h th e airpor t an d communit y t o understan d th e loca l marke t i n orde rt o provid e th e bes t servic e the ycan . Assumin g tha t th e DO T an d FA A allo w Charte rAi rTranspor l t o operat e thei rplanne d servic e w e ar e lookin g forwar d t o th e opportunit yt o wor k wit h Charte rAi rTransport
. Utilizin g th e large rsize d aircraf t Charte rAi rTranspor t operate s will , w e believe , no t onl yimprov e custome rsatisfactio n bu t als o increas e passenge renplanements
. Sincerely , 

### Barr y Lin d ;\irport .Manage r Maniste e Count} , Blacker

Airpor l
(Reap. Dec. 8350)

#### Atlas Pipe, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 247-H, etc.

(Decided November 17, 1954)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiffs.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel that the market values or the prices at the time of exportation to the United States, of the steel line pipe oil well casing and oil well tubing covered by the appeals for reappraisement listed on Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other' costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were as enumerated in said Schedule A, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals for reappraisement be submitted upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the steel line pipe oil-well casing and oil-well tubing here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> 

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
The Honorable Cue D. Boykin, Chairman

Texas Industrial Accident Board Lyndon Baines Johnson Building P. 0. Box 12757, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Opinion No. H- 715 Re: Whether amember of the Industrial Accident Board accumulates sick leave and vacation benefits. Dear Mr. Boykin: You have requested our opinion concerning whether amember ofthe Industrial Accident Board is a state employee for the purposes ofvacation and sick leave entitlement. Article V, section 7ofthe current appropriations act provides vacation and sick leave benefits to It[e]mployees ofthe State
. . . .” Acts 1975. 64th Leg. ,ch. 743. bi Attorney General Opinion M-1280 (1972) this office ruled that a member ofthe Texas Employment Commission is a “State official” rather than an “annual employee” and thus the provisions ofthe appropriations act which related to sick leave and vacation were inapplicable. See also Attorney General Opinion M-1279 (1972). While the then current appropriations act referred to “annual employees of the State” whereas the present act applies to I,[e]mployees ofthe State” we believe the ruling in M-1280 controls your question, for inour view amember of the Industrial Accident Board is clearly a state official rather than a state employee. See V. T. C.S. art. 8307, et seq. ; Aldine Independent School District v. StandleyT 280 S.W. 2d 578 (Tex. Sup. 1955); Attorney General Letter Advisory No. 85 (1974)‘
.. Accordingly, in our opinion, an Industrial Accident Board member does not accumulate sick leave and vacation under the appropriations act. SUMMARY Members of the Industrial Accident Board donot accumulate vacation and sick leave under the appropriations act.. -Very truly yours,

Attorney General of Texas

p. 3070The Honorable Cue D. Boykin - page two (H-715)

Opinion Committee jad:

p. 3071
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

GIBREMARIAM BISEWER : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : Case No. 11-CV-516 

 : 

 v. : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 : 

ZEGRA NISRANE, et al., : Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel 

 : 

 Defendants. :

ORDER

 This matter is before the court on parties’ joint Motion to Substitute Parties with the 

court, requesting the substitution of Defendant Avis Budget Group, LLC’s (“Avis”) for the 

proper defendant insurer, “Pathfinder Insurance.” Upon stipulation of parties, Defendant Avis is 

hereby DISMISSED.

Because Defendant Avis is no longer a party to the action, Defendant Avis’s Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiff’s supplemental complaint (Doc. 9), and Defendant Avis’s subsequent Motion 

for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 22), are deemed MOOT. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: October 19, 2011

Case: 2:11-cv-00516-ALM-TPK Doc #: 32 Filed: 10/19/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-376-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of 
Authorization and Waiver

April 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) seeks authorization from the Commission to use 
the posting and bid evaluation procedures in Section 43 of the General 
Terms & Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff (GT&C) to sell certain excess 
top gas inventory. In conjunction with such sale, Transco requests that 
the Commission grant waiver of Section 43.5 of the GT&C in order for 
Transco to recognize the appropriate accounting from the sale in its 
gas inventory account.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated 
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve 
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cb8d8e998884a5a7a2a5ae98bebbbba4b9bf8badaeb9a8e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="70363522333f1e1c191e15230500001f020430161502135e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time April 11, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6572 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32

Securities
and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of TEL Offshore Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, N.A.,
Corporate Trustee for TEL Offshore TrustDate: May 14, 2014

By:

/s/ MICHAEL J. ULRICH Michael J. Ulrich Vice President


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:   (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/   Roy T. K. Thung
Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: May 12, 2011   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   1
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(a)

     STEPHEN E. ROTH
DIRECT LINE: (202) 383-0158
Internet: sroth@sablaw.com


                                April 26, 2001


Board of Directors
GE Capital Life Assurance
 Company of New York
125 Park Avenue, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10017-5529

          Re   GE Capital Life Separate Account II
               -----------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

          We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption
"Legal Matters" in the Statement of Additional Information filed as part of
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 filed
by GE Capital Life Separate Account II for certain flexible premium variable
deferred annuity contracts (File No. 333-47016).  In giving this consent, we do
not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under
Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

                              Very truly yours,

                              SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP



                              By: /s/ Stephen E. Roth
                                  --------------------------------
                                      Stephen E. Roth