alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-1474V

UNPUBLISHED

GREGGORY DAVIS,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: July 29, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Michael Adly Baseluos, Baseluos Law Firm PLLC, San Antonia, TX, for Petitioner.

Joseph Adam Lewis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On June 15, 2021, Greggory Davis filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) which 

meets the Table definition for GBS or which, in the alternative, was caused-in-fact by the 

influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on October 13, 2020. Petition at 1, ¶ 1. The case was 

assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 11, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.

Specifically, Respondent believes “that [P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in 

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

the Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”) 

for GBS following flu vaccination.” Id. at 9. 

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
P.O. Box 331, Millwood, VA 22646 (540) 837-1602

December 18, 2014
BY HAND Document Control Office Office ofPollution Prevention and Toxics Room 6428 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20460 Re: Testing Consent Order for Ethylene Dichloride; Interim Rep ort (Docket No. OPPT-2003-0010) Dear Sirs: Enclosed in sextuplicate is the six-month interim report required under the Enforceable Consent Agreement for Ethylene Dichloride, 68 Fed. Reg. 33125 (June 3, 2003) (the "ECA"), as amended, describing the status of testing conducted or to be conducted under the ECA . Please do not hesitate to contact me ifthere is any question about this status report.

Enclosures
cc: John E. Schaeffer W. Caffey Norman, Esq. Sincerely,

# f&J~**J, J**  

# &A Peter E. Voytek, l h.D. ManagerToxicity Testing

a nd P BPK M odeling Activities for Ethylene Dichloride--
Int erim Report- Decembe

r 2014 TI ER CAT EGOR Y DESCRIPTION 2

T esting Triggers not met for second generation eva luation 2
Te s ting Combined reproductive toxicity study in lif e phase

STA TUS Comple ted, draft report

i n prepara tion
No. 41871.

#### Protest 307679-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was found from the record that certain items consist of embroidered laces. The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

November 29, 2019

 

ChinaCache International Holdings Ltd.

Section A, Building 3

Dian Tong Creative Square

No.7 Jiuxianqiao North Road

Chaoyang District

Beijing, 100015

People’s Republic of China

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Re: **ChinaCache International Holdings Ltd. (the “Group”)**

 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the headings “Item10.E - Additional Information – Taxation – Cayman Islands Taxation” in ChinaCache International Holdings Ltd.’sAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31 2018, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “**SEC**”) in the month of November 2019 (the “**Annual Report**”), and further consent to theincorporation by reference into the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-172962) pertaining to the 2007, 2008 and 2010 ShareIncentive Plans of ChinaCache International Holdings Ltd. (the “**Group**”), the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-176751) pertaining to the 2011 Share Incentive Plan of the Group, and the Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-195192)of the summary of our opinion under the heading “Item 10.E - Additional Information – Taxation – Cayman IslandsTaxation” in the Annual Report. We also consent to the filing with the SEC of this consent letter as an exhibit to the AnnualReport.

 

In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we comewithin the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act, or the Rules and Regulations ofthe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

 

** **
No. 45114.

#### Protest 43723-K of N. Y. Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivbe, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the atomizers are in chief value of decorated glass the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) was sustained. Abstract 44140 followed.
Before the Third Division,

June 9, 1960

No. 64288.

protests 821429-G/10715, 821432-G/10718, and 825023-G/10745 (New Orleans).

#### A. M. & J. Solari, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the elaim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2008104EN.01000601.xml

| 25.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 April 2008

(2008/C 104/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5769 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4627 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79800 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3020 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6156 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 116,96 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9595 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,128 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,26 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6987 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,4181 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5920 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 32,406 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0471 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6689 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6042 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,2875 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9922 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1393 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 570,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,2194 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 11,0336 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2680 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 539,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9570 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,190 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 37,0710 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,814 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6137 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5204 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5769

JPY

Japanese yen

163,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4627

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79800

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3020

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6156

ISK

Iceland króna

116,96

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9595

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,128

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,26

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6987

PLN

Polish zloty

3,4181

RON

Romanian leu

3,5920

SKK

Slovak koruna

32,406

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0471

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6689

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6042

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,2875

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9922

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1393

KRW

South Korean won

1 570,99

ZAR

South African rand

12,2194

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

11,0336

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2680

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 539,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9570

PHP

Philippine peso

66,190

RUB

Russian rouble

37,0710

THB

Thai baht

49,814

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6137

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5204

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0114

_________________

IN RE THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF:

C. PATRICIA FIELD,

 Deceased.

SCOTT FIELD,

 Appellant,

 v.

ESTATE OF C. PATRICIA FIELD

and GREG FIELD,

 Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Christopher D. Abbott, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2023

09/20/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0114
# C_2007247EN.01002402.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/24

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2007 — González y Díez v Commission

(Case T-25/04) (1)

1

(State aid - Aid to cover exceptional restructuring costs - Withdrawal of an earlier decision - Expiry of the ECSC Treaty - Competence of the Commission - Continuity of the Community legal order - No infringement of essential procedural requirements - Protection of legitimate expectations - Manifest error of assessment)

(2007/C 247/36)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: González y Díez SA, (Villabona-Llanera, Spain), (represented by J. Díez-Hochleitner and A. Martínez Sánchez, lawyers),

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by J. Buendía Sierra, acting as Agent, and subsequently by C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agent, the latter assisted by Buendía Sierra, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of Articles 1, 3 and 4 of Commission Decision 2004/340/EC of 5 November 2003 on aid for González y Díez SA to cover exceptional expenses (aid for 2001 and misuse of aid for 1998 and 2000), and amending Commission Decision 2002/827/ECSC (OJ 2004 L 119, p. 26).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 3(b), in so far as it concerns the amount of EUR 54 057,63 (ESP 8 994 433), and Article 4(1)(b) of Commission Decision 2004/340/EC of 5 November 2003 concerning aid to the company González y Díez SA to cover exceptional costs (aid for 2001 and incorrect use of the aid for 1998 and 2000), amending Decision No 2002/827/ECSC. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 3(b), in so far as it concerns the amount of EUR 54 057,63 (ESP 8 994 433), and Article 4(1)(b) of Commission Decision 2004/340/EC of 5 November 2003 concerning aid to the company González y Díez SA to cover exceptional costs (aid for 2001 and incorrect use of the aid for 1998 and 2000), amending Decision No 2002/827/ECSC.

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder.

| 3. | Orders the applicant to bear four-fifths of its own costs and to pay four-fifths of the costs incurred by the Commission. The Commission shall bear a fifth of its own costs and pay a fifth of the costs incurred by González y Díez. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the applicant to bear four-fifths of its own costs and to pay four-fifths of the costs incurred by the Commission. The Commission shall bear a fifth of its own costs and pay a fifth of the costs incurred by González y Díez.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 20.3.2004.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32





FULUCAI PRODUCTIONS LTD.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Fulucai Productions Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Durward as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: June 6, 2011
By:
James DurwardName:
James DurwardTitle:
Principal Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
No. 51115.

#### Protests 989349-G, etc., of Stephen Rug Mills (New York),

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Second Division,

November 3, 1949

No. 53691.

protests 122970-K, etc. (Galveston).

#### Collin & Gissel *v.*United States,

Lawrence, Judge:

The protests listed in Schedule “A,” attached to and made part of this decision, have been submitted on a stipulation of the parties in which it was agreed that the merchandise represented by the items marked “A” and initialed HLB or RET on the invoices accompanying the entries, which was assessed with duty at 65 per centum ad valorem and $4.50 each or at only 65 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 368 of the Tariff Act of 1930, consists of gravity meters, gradiometers, and parts thereof, similar in all material respects to the gradiometers and gravity meters the subject of *Asiatic Petroleum Corp.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 3, C. D. 1058, and *American Askania Corp.*v. *United States,*20 Cust. Ct. 302, Abstract 52267, the records in which cases have been incorporated herein and wherein the merchandise was held to be properly dutiable at 27)4 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 372 of said act as machines, not specially provided for. There is no controversy with regard to the copper tax of 3 cents per pound levied under the provisions of section 3425 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Following the cited authorities, we hold the gradiometers and gravity meters, represented by the invoice items marked and initialed as aforesaid, to be properly dutiable at the rate of 27)4 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph 372 as machines, not specially provided for, plus the uncontroverted copper tax assessment where applicable.

Inasmuch as paragraph 372, *supra,*provides that—

> * * * parts, not specially provided for, * * * of any of the foregoing, shall be dutiable at the same rate of duty as the articles • of which they are parts, * * *

*200it follows that the parts of said gradiometers and gravity meters, represented by the invoice items marked and initialed as aforesaid, are likewise properly dutiable at the rate of 27)4 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph 372 as parts of machines, not specially provided for, plus the uncontroverted copper tax assessment where applicable.

To the extent above indicated, the claim of plaintiff is sustained. All other claims are overruled.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 15.1



CONSENT OF CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ARGENTINA
S.A.



We hereby consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form F-20 of Adecoagro S.A. for the year ended December 31,
2016 and any amendments thereto (the “Annual Report”) and the references to and information contained in the Cushman
& Wakefield Argentina S.A. Appraisal of Real Property report dated September 30, 2016 prepared for Adecoagro S.A., wherever
appearing in the Annual Report, including but not limited to our company under the heading “Item 4 – Information
about the Company” in the Annual Report.







Dated: April 27, 2017







| | Cushman & Wakefield Argentina S.A.
| | ----------------------------------
| |                                   
| | By:                               
| | Name:                             
| | Title:
**** 

**Exhibit 4.31**

**** 

**Summary of the Rural Partnership Agreement, entered into on January 11, 2017, in connection with Fazenda São José**

**Parties**: Jaborandi Agrícola Ltda., Agro Pecuária e Industrial Serra Grande Ltda., as well as Imobiliária Ceibo Ltda. and Brasilagro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedade Agrícolas, both as Intervening-consenting party.

**Purpose**: The Agricultural Partnership Agreement involves a total arable land area of 14,900 hectares, located in the real property named Fazenda São José/Part 1, which has a total area of 43,146,6351 hectares, and is the object of the property and enrollment certificate No. 6.885 of the Real Estate Registry Office of the District of São Raimundo das Mangabeiras, State of Maranhão. 

Pursuant to the agreement, the interest of Agro Pecuária e Industrial Serra Grande Ltda. in the rural partnership  shall be 10% of the total amount of sugarcane produced in (i) the area that is the subject-matter of the aforementioned Partnership Agreement and in (ii) the agriculturable, arable, or useful area of the property that is subject to the Private Instrument of Real Properties and Rural Assets Purchase and Sale Commitment and Other Covenants, also entered into by the parties on the same date, which  relates to the purchase, by Imobiliária Ceibo Ltda., of an area of 17,565,7592 hectares (with an arable area of approximately 10,000 hectares). The relevant deed has already been executed.

The Partnership Agreement shall be in force and effect for a term of 15 years, and may be extended, at the sole discretion of Jaborandi Agrícola Ltda., for an additional period of 15 years, by means of formal notice addressed to Agro Pecuária e Industrial Serra Grande Ltda. at least two years  before the initial term of the Partnership Agreement terminates.

The hiring of all services and employees required for purposes of operating the land, and which are necessary to meet the obligations under this Partnership Agreement (as well as the production of the sugarcane pursuant to the Supply Agreement), shall be the sole and exclusive responsibility of the party that contracts such service providers, employees or third-parties involved in the development of activities relating to this Agreement. Accordingly, neither party shall be liable, at any time, for any labor and/or social security obligations, labor accidents or any other obligations, relating to the service providers, employees or third party contractors of the other party. 

The Partnership Agreement and the Supply Agreement are deemed to be connected to each other,  the events of termination of one agreement shall give cause to the termination of the other.
# C_2007199EN.01005202.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/52

---

Action brought on 18 June 2007 — Bauch v Commission

(Case F-61/07)

(2007/C 199/101)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Gerhard Bauch (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: W. Uhlmann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Direct the defendant to amend its certificate of 12 March 2003 or, alternatively, to issue further confirmation to the applicant to the effect that the amount repaid to the applicant does not amount to a severance grant by way of compensation for retirement pension rights or, therefore, to a retirement pension or the equivalent of a retirement pension; |
| --- | --- |

—

Direct the defendant to amend its certificate of 12 March 2003 or, alternatively, to issue further confirmation to the applicant to the effect that the amount repaid to the applicant does not amount to a severance grant by way of compensation for retirement pension rights or, therefore, to a retirement pension or the equivalent of a retirement pension;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant was employed by the Commission of the European Communities as a member of the temporary staff. He was granted unpaid leave for that period of employment from his post as an official of the then Federal Ministry of Economics. The Ministry reduced the applicant's retirement pension because of the cumulation of pension benefits and a pension from international and supranational employment, as the Commission of the European Communities had issued the applicant with a certificate concerning the payment of a severance grant in compensation for pension rights.

The applicant complains that the Commission's certificate is defective inasmuch as members of the temporary staff cannot acquire pension rights owing to the short period of service (Articles 77 to 84 of the Staff Regulations), and the applicant was thus merely refunded the pension fund contributions that had been deducted.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of QR Energy, LP (the Partnership), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), Alan L. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Alan L. Smith                   
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Alan L. Smith                       
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director