Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Notices 16765 

these reviews within the current time 

limit because of the number of 

respondents in these reviews and the 

complexity of the issues under analysis 

such as further–manufacturing 

operations in the United States, the 

‘‘collapsing’’ of companies, and the use 

of constructed value for reseller 

respondents for which we need to issue 

additional questionnaires. Therefore, we 

are extending the time period for issuing 

the preliminary results of these reviews 

by 59 additional days until May 31, 

2007. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: March 30, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–6384 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–866] 

Folding Gift Boxes from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of the 

Expedited Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 1, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) initiated a sunset 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on folding gift boxes from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (‘‘Act’’). See Initiation of 

Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 71 FR 

69545 (December 1, 2006) (‘‘Sunset 

Initiation’’); see also Notice of 

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain 

Folding Gift Boxes From the People’s 

Republic of China, 67 FR 864 (January 

8, 2002) (‘‘Order’’). Based on the notice 

of intent to participate and response 

filed by the domestic interested party, 

and the lack of response from 

respondent interested parties, the 

Department conducted an expedited 

sunset review of the Order pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

C.F.R. 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result 

of this sunset review, the Department 

finds that revocation of the Order would 

likely lead to continuation or recurrence 

of dumping at the levels indicated in the 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Juanita H. Chen or Robert A. Bolling; 

AD/CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

202–482–1904 and 202–482–3434, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 1, 2006, the Department 

initiated a sunset review of the Order on 

folding gift boxes from the PRC 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. 

See Sunset Initiation. On December 15, 

2006, the Department timely received a 

notice of intent to participate from 

Simkins Industries, Inc. (‘‘Simkins’’), 

pursuant to 19 C.F.R. 351.218(d)(1)(i). 

Simkins claimed interested party status 

under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a 

domestic producer of subject 

merchandise. On January 3, 2007, the 

Department received a request from 

Harvard Folding Box Company, Inc. 

(‘‘Harvard Box’’), asking to be 

substituted for Simkins as the domestic 

interested party in the sunset review. 

Both Simkins and Harvard Box are 

represented by the same counsel. 

Harvard Box also filed a substantive 

response within the 30-day deadline as 

specified in 19 C.F.R. 351.218(d)(3)(i). 

The Department did not receive any 

objections to Harvard Box’s request to 

be substituted for Simkins. The 

Department did not receive a 

substantive response from any 

respondent interested party. As a result, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and 19 C.F.R. 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), 

the Department conducted an expedited 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope Of The Order 

The products covered by the order are 

certain folding gift boxes. Folding gift 

boxes are a type of folding or knock–

down carton manufactured from paper 

or paperboard. Folding gift boxes are 

produced from a variety of recycled and 

virgin paper or paperboard materials, 

including, but not limited to, clay–

coated paper or paperboard and kraft 

(bleached or unbleached) paper or 

paperboard. The scope of the order 

excludes gift boxes manufactured from 

paper or paperboard of a thickness of 

more than 0.8 millimeters, corrugated 

paperboard, or paper mache. The scope 

of the order also excludes those gift 

boxes for which no side of the box, 

when assembled, is at least nine inches 

in length. 

Folding gift boxes included in the 

scope of the order are typically 

decorated with a holiday motif using 

various processes, including printing, 

embossing, debossing, and foil 

stamping, but may also be plain white 

or printed with a single color. The 

subject merchandise includes folding 

gift boxes, with or without handles, 

whether finished or unfinished, and 

whether in one–piece or multi–piece 

configuration. One–piece gift boxes are 

die–cut or otherwise formed so that the 

top, bottom, and sides form a single, 

contiguous unit. Two–piece gift boxes 

are those with a folded bottom and a 

folded top as separate pieces. Folding 

gift boxes are generally packaged in 

shrink–wrap, cellophane, or other 

packaging materials, in single or multi–

box packs for sale to the retail customer. 

The scope of the order excludes folding 

gift boxes that have a retailer’s name, 

logo, trademark or similar company 

information printed prominently on the 

box’s top exterior (such folding gift 

boxes are often known as ‘‘not–forresale’’ gift boxes or ‘‘give–away’’ gift 

boxes and may be provided by 

department and specialty stores at no 

charge to their retail customers). The 

scope of the order also excludes folding 

gift boxes where both the outside of the 

box is a single color and the box is not 

packaged in shrink–wrap, cellophane, 

other resin–based packaging films, or 

paperboard. 

Imports of the subject merchandise 

are classified under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 4819.20.0040 

and 4819.50.4060. These subheadings 

also cover products that are outside the 

scope of the order. Furthermore, 

although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, our written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Analysis Of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this review are addressed in 

the accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, which is hereby adopted 

by this notice. See ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results in 

the Expedited Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Folding 

Gift Boxes from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary, to David M. 

Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, dated March 29, 2007 

(‘‘I&D Memo’’). The issues discussed in 

the accompanying I&D Memo include 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and the 

magnitude of the dumping margin likely 

to prevail if the Order were revoked. 

Parties can obtain a public copy of the 

I&D Memo on file in the Central Records 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
16766 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Notices 

Unit, room B–099, of the main 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete public version of the I&D 

Memo can be accessed directly on the 

Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov and clicking 

on ‘‘Federal Register Notices.’’ The 

paper copy and electronic version of the 

I&D Memo are identical in content. 

Final Results Of Sunset Review 

The Department determines that 

revocation of the Order on folding gift 

boxes from the PRC would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the rates listed below: 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted–Average 

Margin (Percent) 

Red Point Paper Products Co., Ltd. ............. 8.90 % 

Max Fortune Industrial 

Ltd. ............................ 1.67 % (de 

minimis) 

PRC–wide rate ............. 164.75 % 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 C.F.R. 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: March 29, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–6404 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–821] 

Notice of Extension of Deadline for the 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review: 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from 

Thailand 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristin Case or Richard Rimlinger, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3174 and (202) 

482–4477, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Extension of Deadline 

At the request of various parties, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on polyethylene retail carrier bags from 

Thailand for the peri1od August 1, 

2005, through July 31, 2006. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, 71 FR 57465 (September 29, 

2006). Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

requires the Department to issue 

preliminary results of review within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested and final results within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary results were published. If it 

is not practicable to complete the review 

within these time periods, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary results to a maximum of 

365 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month. 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review within the current time limit 

because of the number of respondents in 

this review and the complexity of the 

issues under analysis. Further, we 

received below–cost allegations and are 

currently conducting below–cost 

investigations for several of the 

respondents. Accordingly, because we 

need to analyze and incorporate the 

information from recently filed 

submissions, we are extending the 

deadline for issuing the preliminary 

results of this review by 60 days until 

July 2, 2007. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: March 30, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–6406 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A- 570–847] 

Polyvinyl Alcohol from the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit 

Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations, 

Import Administration, Room 1870, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–6412. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 2, 2006, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on polyvinyl 

alcohol (‘‘PVA’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation: Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review, 71 FR 57920 

(October 2, 2006). On October 23, 2006, 

Sinopec Sichuan Vinylon Works 

(‘‘SVW’’) requested that the Department 

conduct an administrative review of 

SVW. The Department published a 

notice of initiation of the antidumping 

duty administrative review of PVA from 

the PRC for the period October 1, 2005, 

through September 30, 2006. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 71 FR 68535 (November 27, 2006). 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the party 

that requested the review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. On January 18, 

2007, SVW withdrew its request for an 

administrative review within 90 days of 

the publication of the notice of 

initiation of this review. Therefore, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

and consistent with its practice, the 

Department hereby rescinds the 

administrative review of Polyvinyl 

Alcohol from the People’s Republic of 

China for the period October 1, 2005, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES