alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007297EN.01003701.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/37

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2007 — Feralpi Siderurgica v Commission

(Case T-77/03) (1)

1

(Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Producers of reinforcing bars - Decision establishing an infringement of Article 65 CS - Decision based on the ECSC Treaty after expiry of that treaty - Lack of competence of the Commission)

(2007/C 297/75)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Feralpi Siderurgica SpA (Brescia, Italy) (represented by: G.M. Roberti, A. Franchi and I. Perego, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin and A. Whelan, Agents, and P. Manzini, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant:Italian Republic (represented by: I. Braguglia, Agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2002) 5087 final of 17 December 2002, relating to a proceeding under Article 65 CS (Case COMP/37.956 — Reinforcing bars).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2002) 5087 final of 17 December 2002 relating to a proceeding under Article 65 CS (Case COMP/37.956 — Reinforcing bars) with regard to Feralpi Siderurgica SpA; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2002) 5087 final of 17 December 2002 relating to a proceeding under Article 65 CS (Case COMP/37.956 — Reinforcing bars) with regard to Feralpi Siderurgica SpA;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Feralpi Siderurgica; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Feralpi Siderurgica;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 10.5.2003.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 -0587 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSE MARTINEZ JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 28, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 20 2022

10/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0587
No. 55399.

#### Barnet Bros. Leather Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 144124-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# One flag, one land -- one nation, evermore

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  One flag, one land -- one nation, evermore 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. American Forces Information Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 94-0175-P. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Holmes, Oliver Wendell, 1809-1894 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; 77; Defense billboard (1988) ; # 77. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2007184EN.01000201.xml

| 7.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 August 2007

(2007/C 184/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3818 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 162,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4426 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68015 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2192 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6385 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,09 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9425 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,067 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,32 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6968 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7886 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,1768 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,38 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7715 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,613 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,455 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8183 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8153 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0924 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 276,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8274 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4478 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3022 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 850,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,79 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,734 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,197 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,385 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3818

JPY

Japanese yen

162,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4426

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68015

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2192

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6385

ISK

Iceland króna

88,09

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9425

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

28,067

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,32

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6968

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7886

RON

Romanian leu

3,1768

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,38

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7715

AUD

Australian dollar

1,613

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,455

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8183

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8153

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0924

KRW

South Korean won

1 276,02

ZAR

South African rand

9,8274

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4478

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3022

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 850,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,79

PHP

Philippine peso

62,734

RUB

Russian rouble

35,197

THB

Thai baht

41,385

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BRASILAGRO  Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Julio Cesar de Toledo Piza Neto, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/    Julio Cesar de Toledo Piza Neto
|Name: Julio Cesar de Toledo Piza Neto 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer        



|                 
|-----------------
|November 26, 2013
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The top 10 reasons to hire members of National Guard and Reserve

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The top 10 reasons to hire members of National Guard and Reserve 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Top ten reasons to hire members of National Guard and Reserve 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  128 × 40 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  040865998.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2007170EN.01002002.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/20

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 June 2007 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-232/04) (1)

1

(EAGGF - ‘Guarantee’ section - Decision ordering the reimbursement of sums paid as an advance)

(2007/C 170/37)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: V. Kontolaimos, I. Chalkias and S. Chala, acing as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande, acting as Agent, and by N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/302/EC of 30 March 2004 on a financial contribution from the Community to expenditure incurred by Greece in establishing the Community vineyard register (OJ 2004 L 98, p. 57)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 10.7.2004 (formerly Case C-218/04).

1

---
Exhibit 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc.

New York, NY

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S3 (No. 333-231949, No. 333-230503, No. 333-221281, No. 333-216666) and Form S-8 (No. 333-207265) of Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc. of our report dated May 11, 2020, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appear in Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2019, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2020. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

 

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

 

New York, NY

October 26, 2020
**Exhibit 15.2**

[Letterhead of Fangda Partners] 

April 30, 2012 

ShangPharma Corporation

No. 5 Building, 998 Halei Road 

Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong New Area 

Shanghai, 201203 

People’s Republic ofChina 

Dear Sirs, 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the headings “Regulation” in ShangPharma Corporation’s Annual Report on Form20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We also consent to the filing with the SEC of this consent letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2011.
October 2, 2015

Mr. Ken Powaski

2341 Gary Drive

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Dear M r. Powaski :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request , posted to the public docket on July 16, 2015, filed in

D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2978 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send u s all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministra tion (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa A. Herbert, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                                             |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|/s/ Teresa A. Herbert
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2006 |  |  | 





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



1
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v. ROBERT J. SMITH, Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

5 USCMA 460, 18 CMR 84

*461No. 5516

Decided February 4, 1955

Col Burton F. Ellis, U. S. Army, Lt Col George M. Thorpe, U. S. Army, and 1st Lt Carl D. Hall, U. S. Army, for Appellant.

Lt Col Thomas J. Newton, U. S. Army, and 1st Lt William G. Fowler, U. S. Army, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMAN, Judge:

Smith, the accused before us, was found guilty, following trial by general court-martial, of desertion terminated by apprehension, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 85, 50 USC § 679. The findings, and his sentence to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for two years, were approved by the convening authority and thereafter, on May 19, 1954, affirmed by a board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General, United States Army. Two days later The Judge Advocate General — pursuant to the provisions of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, paragraph 100c (1) (a) — mailed the board’s decision to the officer at the time exercising general court-martial jurisdiction over the accused. That officer received the decision on May 24, 1954, and on May 27, 1954, the accused acknowledged receipt of a copy.

Dn May 26, 1954 — one day prior to this service — his counsel had filed with the board of review a petition for reconsideration. This pleading urged that the board re-evaluate the legal sufficiency of the evidence concerning the accused’s apprehension in light of the decision rendered by us on May 21, 1954, in the case of United States v. Salter, 4 USCMA 338, 15 CMR 338. The board concluded, however, that it lacked power to entertain the motion. Thereupon The Judge Advocate General certified to us the identical questions presented by him in United States v. Sparks, 5 USCMA 453, 18 CMR 77, and set out in that opinion. The accused subsequently filed a petition for review, which included the assignment of error urged in the petition for reconsideration — namely that the evidence to sustain the finding of apprehension was insufficient. Government appellate counsel now concede that there was such a failure of proof under our holdings in United States v. Salter, supra, and United States v. Crawford, 4 USCMA 701, 16 CMR 275. We accept this concession.

II

Since the three certified questions were answered by us fully in United States v. Sparks, supra, there seems little point in retracing our steps here. Suffice it to say that the petition for reconsideration was timely — for the *462reason that it preceded the filing of any petition for review here, or the lapse of thirty days from the date of the service of the board’s decision on the accused. Accordingly, the board erred in holding that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the petition.

Therefore, the record of trial must be remanded to the board of review for further proceedings in accord with this opinion, and it is so ordered.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Lati-MER concur.

Ill
September 11, 1944

No. 49710.

Suit 4455.

#### *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 773 affirmed (32 C. C. P. A. 56, C. A. D. 285).
Case: 2:11-cv-01081-EAS-MRA Doc #: 44 Filed: 04/16/14 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01081-EAS-MRA Doc #: 44 Filed: 04/16/14 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-01081-EAS-MRA Doc #: 44 Filed: 04/16/14 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T09:56:36-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
(Reap. Dec. 8922)

Entry No. 710244-1, etc.

#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

(Decided July 23, 1957)

*Sharrelts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to glass Christmas tree ornaments exported from the Western Zone of Germany and entered at the port of New York.

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted these cases on stipulated facts which establish that export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and that such statutory value in each case is the appraised value, less the amounts added under duress, packing included, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of China Herb Group Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Qiuping Lu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

  

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.