alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.3



| |  |                                         |  |                                                                                         
| |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Conyers Dill & Pearman (Cayman) Limited |  | BERMUDA
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS
DUBAI HONG KONG
LONDON MAURITIUS
SINGAPORE
| |  | PO Box 2681                             | 
| |  | Grand Cayman KY1-1111                   | 
| |  | Cayman Islands                          | 
| |  | Tel: +1 (345) 945 3901                  | 
| |  | Fax: +1 (345) 945 3902                  | 
| |  | conyersdill.com                         | 



LOGO

July 30, 2014

Sky-mobi
Limited

10/F, Building B, United Mansion

No. 2,
Zijinghua Road

Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310013

Peoples
Republic of China

Dear Sirs,

Sky-mobi Limited (the
Company)

Annual Report on Form 20-F

We hereby consent to the summary of and reference to our opinion in the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 31 March 2014
(the Form 20-F) to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on July 30, 2014 and the filing with the SEC of this consent letter as an exhibit to the Form 20-F. In giving such consent, we do not
thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act, or the Rules and Regulations of the SEC thereunder.

Yours faithfully,

/s/ Conyers Dill & Pearman (Cayman)
Limited

Conyers Dill & Pearman (Cayman) Limited
(Reap. Dec. 9303)

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 915.

(Decided January 26, 1959)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (Allerton deC. Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General *(Henry J. O’Neill,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The proper value for dutiable purposes of certain alloy steel bars exported from Sweden is the subject of the instant controversy.

At the call of the case for hearing, the parties agreed that the merchandise in issue does not appear on the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1966 (70 Stat. 948, Public Law 927, 84th Congress).

It was further agreed by the parties that the price at the time of exportation to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the entered values (unit prices *453on page 1 of the invoice accompanying the entry herein, less the nondutiable charges marked ND and checked in red ink on page 2 of said invoice).

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. §1402(b)), as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, *supra,*is the proper basis for determining the value of the alloy steel bars in controversy, and that said value is represented by the entered values (unit prices on page 1 of the invoice accompanying the entry herein, less the nondutiable charges marked ND and checked in red ink on page 2 of said invoice). As to all other merchandise, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit 31.2

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Lee Bendekgey, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Invitae Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 27, 2015

/s/ LEE BENDEKGEY Lee Bendekgey Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual
report on Form 20-F of InterXion Holding N.V. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the
Company hereby certifies to the undersigneds knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/ David C. Ruberg                    
|David C. Ruberg Chief Executive Officer
|                                       
|Date: April 27, 2012
U.S

. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 

## DEC 24 2014

**~r. ~ark**  Creager GDC Technics, Ltd. 607N. Frank Luke Drive San Antonio, Texas 78226 Dear

**~r.** Creager: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S.W. Renton ,Washington 98057-3356

Wehave received your petition letter dated November 7, 2014, requesting exemption from § 25.813(e) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. This request was submittedto the DepartmentofTransportation's Federal Docket

**~anagement** System (at Regulations.gov) onNovember 20,2014, and has been assigned DocketNo. FAA-2014-0981. The exemption, ifgranted, would permit relieffrom the requirement that no door may be installed between any passenger seat that is occupiable for takeoffand landing and any passenger emergency exit, such that the door crosses any egress path (including aisles, crossaisles, and passageways)

. You stated that the proposed exemption is specifically intended for a VIP interior on a Boeing 787-8 airplane designated as "not for hire, not for common carriage." The petition also stated that you have chosen to comply with the applicable provisions ofSpecial Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) No. 109. This is to inform you that we have reviewed your petition and the proposed interior door installation, in conjunction with the provisions ofSFAR 109. We have determined that according to paragraph 10 ofthe SFAR, the design proposed by GDC Technics, Ltd., would satisfy the requirements ofthe SFAR and therefore, an exemption from§ 25.813(e) is not needed. You may withdraw your petition in writing via Regulations.gov (DocketNo. FAA-2014- 0981) within 30 days. Otherwise, ifwe have notheard from you within that timeframe, we will close the docket with no further notice to you. Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process,please contact

**~r.** JeffGardlin at (425) 227-2136, or by e-mail at Jeff.Gardlin@faa.gov. Sincerely, 

# .f'7- Suzanne



# ~asterson

**~anager,** Airframe & Cabin Safety Transport Standards Staff 

## COPY OF ORiGINAL
DEVEN J. COLLINS

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILE D

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4764

Opinion filed June 8, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal

- - Original Jurisdiction

.

Deven J. Collins, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for bela ted appeal is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 22, 2015

jam

Order 

Clerk

January 22, 2015

150872 (3)

STEVEN ANDERSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 150872

AGC: 2475-12

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $24.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$351.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The Judiciary Act of 1789, the foundation of the federal judicial system

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The Judiciary Act of 1789, the foundation of the federal judicial system 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Archives and Records Administration 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Archives and Records Administration 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. National Archives and Records Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 41 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  index.cpd 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489528 

Part of: The Judiciary Act of 1789, the foundation of the federal judicial system (2 objects)     Next

The Judiciary Act of 1789, the foundation of the federal judicial system

The Judiciary Act of 1789, the foundation of the federal judicial system

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION

I, Regina E. Groves, certify that:

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K/A of REVA Medical, Inc.; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date:  May 1, 2017

 

|   | /s/ Regina E. Groves          |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Regina E. Groves              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | (principal executive officer) |
# C_2007297EN.01003203.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/32

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 28 June 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-369/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 297/54)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 28.10.2006.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 14, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

----------------------

No. 06-10150

Summary Calendar

----------------------

JOSEPH TARANTINO

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERICAS LLC

Defendant - Appellee

-----------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth

No. 4:05-CV-569

------------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This suit grew out of the efforts of plaintiff-appellant

Joseph Tarantino to seek employment with defendant-appellee

DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC (“DCS”) in 2003. 

The efforts were unsuccessful and Tarantino sued DCS in state

court in Texas, alleging that DCS owed Tarantino, as a

“prospective employee,” a “duty to notify” him in a timely manner
2

that he was declined for employment. The case was removed to

federal court. The district court dismissed Tarantino’s

complaint under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a

claim, holding that, under the facts alleged, DCS had no legal

duty to Tarantino, as a prospective employee, under Texas law. 

The district court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order addressed not

only the facts alleged in Tarantino’s complaint but also the

facts set out in Tarantino’s response to DCS’s motion to dismiss,

“[g]iving the plaintiff the benefit of every doubt.” 

On appeal, Tarantino’s brief continues to claim that he

could allege additional facts that would support an alternative

theory of recovery, but (assuming arguendo that setting such

facts out in his appellate brief would be timely) he fails to set

out what those facts are. The main focus of his brief, however,

is on his argument that the district court abused its discretion

in denying Tarantino’s motion for leave to amend his pleading. 

DCS points out that Tarantino’s only requested amendment was

included in the “Request for Relief” section of his district

court brief where he asked for permission to amend his complaint

if the district court were to determine that he failed to state a

claim. Tarantino is correct that FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) does allow

a plaintiff to amend its pleading once as a matter of course at

any time before a responsive pleading is filed. His problem -

and it is a fatal problem - is that he never furnished the

district court with the substance of a proposed amendment other
3

than to allege more facts and legal theories in his brief, facts

and theories which would not have prevented the dismissal of his

case. Under the circumstances, the district court did not err in

failing to give Tarantino an opportunity to amend his pleading. 

The theories he alludes to in his appellate brief would fare no

better.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|               |  |           |  |                       
|-------------- |  | --------- |  | ----------------------
|Subsidiary     |  | Ownership |  | State of Incorporation
|               |  |          
|Wolverine Bank |  | 100%      |  | Federal               

SUBSIDIARIES OF
WOLVERINE BANK



|                    |  |           |  |                       
|------------------- |  | --------- |  | ----------------------
|Subsidiary          |  | Ownership |  | State of Incorporation
|                    |  |          
|Wolserv Corporation |  | 100%      |  | Michigan
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 030507C]


Marine Mammals; File No. 373-1868

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Notice is hereby given that the Point Reyes Bird Observatory 
(PRBO) Conservation Science (Dr. William J. Sydeman, Responsible 
Party), 3820 Cypress Drive, <greek-i> 11 Petaluma, CA 94954 has been 
issued a permit to conduct scientific research on pinnipeds in 
California.

ADDRESSES:  The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)427-2521; and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213; phone (562)980-4001; fax (562)980-4018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaclyn Daly or Amy Sloan, (301)713-
2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 6, 2006, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (71 FR 64943) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to take harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi), 
northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris), California sea lions 
(Zalophus californianus), and northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) 
had been submitted by the above-named organization. The requested 
permit has been issued under the authority of the Marine Mammal 
Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and the 
regulations governing the taking and importing of marine mammals (50 
CFR part 216).
    A permit has been issued to PRBO to conduct scientific research on 
pinnipeds. A maximum of 300 harbor seals and 3,050 elephant seals will 
be captured or handled per year over a five year period, and an 
estimated 300 elephant seals, 5,150 harbor seals, 600 California sea 
lions, and five northern fur seals per year will be incidentally 
disturbed during pinniped research operations.
    In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final determination has been made that the 
activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to 
prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

    Dated: April 4, 2007.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-6755 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
No. 59143.

protests 913900-G and 937545-G (New York).

#### W. T. Grant Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protests were dismissed.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2007-28661

Directorate Identifier: 2007NM013AD

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 3/11 (IBR)

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 3/08

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 4/08

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 6/08

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 2/09

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 3/09

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 8/09

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 9/09

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 11/09

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 1/10

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 5/10

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 7/10

MPD D626A001-CMR – SEC 9 --- 8/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008