alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES, AND TRUST CORPUS AS OF MAR-31-2000 AND THE
STATEMENT OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAR-31-2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,575,833
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,575,833
<PP&E>                                      28,267,655
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,919,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,924,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     348,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,924,050
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,269,198
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               189,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,458,349
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,458,349
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .306
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .306


</TABLE>
# C_2007283EN.01002602.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/26

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2007 — Lancôme v OHIM — Baudon (AROMACOSMETIQUE)

(Case T-185/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark AROMACOSMETIQUE - Earlier national word mark AROMACOSMETIQUE - Invalidity of the earlier national word mark - No need to adjudicate)

(2007/C 283/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Antoine-Lalance, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Jacqueline Baudon (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 March 2004 (Case R 39/2002-4) concerning the invalidity proceedings 155 C 000866335/1 between Ms Jacqueline Baudon and Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 28.8.2004.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

LOIS D. BOWERS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-CV-845

Judge Economus

Magistrate Judge King 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

ORDER

Upon plaintiff’s own motion, Doc. No. 12, this action is hereby

voluntarily DISMISSED with prejudice.

 s/Norah McCann King 

 Norah M Cann King c

 United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 24, 2012

Case: 2:11-cv-00845-PCE-NMK Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/24/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

60 WALL STREET

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10005




May 8, 2008




Wellman, Inc.

1041 521 Corporate Center Drive

Fort Mill, South Carolina 29715

Attention: Chief Financial Officer

and Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer




Re: Wellman, Inc. Credit Agreement dated as of February 27, 2008




     Reference is hereby made to that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2008, by
and among Wellman, Inc. (the “Funds Administrator”) and the other Borrowers party thereto,
as debtors and debtors in possession, as Borrowers, the Lenders from time to time party thereto,
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Administrative Agent (in such capacity, the
“Administrative Agent”) and Collateral Agent, and the other agents signatory thereto (as
amended, restated, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit
Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings assigned to such terms in the Credit Agreement.



     The undersigned Administrative Agent, on behalf of the Majority Lenders, hereby consents to
the Funds Administrator’s request that Section 9.1(i)(xvi) of the Credit Agreement be modified by
replacing the text “within 90 days after the Petition Date” therein with the text “on or before
May 29, 2008”. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Credit Agreement continues in full force
and effect and the amendment set forth above shall be limited precisely as written.



[signature page follows]




 









 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY	 	 
	 	 	AMERICAS, as Administrative Agent	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Marguerite Sutton
 

	 	  
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Enrique Landaeta
 

	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Vice President	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	Acknowledged and agreed as of	 	 
	This 8 day of May, 2008	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	WELLMAN, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Keith R. Phillips
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Chief Financial Officer	 	 






Signature Page to Consent
#### Theresa Bannwart, Resp’t, *v.*The First Bohemian Brewing Co., Impl’d, App’lt.

*(New York Common Pleas, General Term,*

*Filed February 3, 1890.)*

Appeal—District courts.

In an action in a district court to replevin chattels defendant denied having made an absolute sale of them to one S., but a bill of sale to him was shown and it was shown that S. gave a chattel mortgage thereon which was recorded at defendant’s request. *Held,*that the question being one of fact the judgment could not be reversed by this court unless there was a greater preponderance of evidence than appears in this case.

Appeal from a judgment of the fourth district court of the city of New York.

*Morrison &*Kennedy, for app’lt; *8.*Mullen, for resp’t.

BooKSTAVER, J.

The action was brought for the claim and delivery of certain personal property claimed by the plaintiff under a chattel mortgage which was past due. As to the chandeliers -covered by the mortgage, there is no claim whatever that either of the defendants were at any time the owners of them, and consequently the mortgagor Shulte had the right to mortgage or sell them at his pleasure. As to the remainder of the property, the appellant, The First Bohemian Brewing Company, was at one time the owner. On behalf of plaintiff it is claimed that the company •sold these goods to the mortgagor Shulte absolutely, for $500 to be paid in installments of fifteen per cent, of the amount of beer -sold by Shulte as the business went on, and a bill is introduced which goes to corroborate this contention. It is true the defendants deny there was any such absolute sale made, but the evi*307dence shows that subsequently Shulte gave them a mortgage upon these same goods, and had it recorded, as he claims, at their request. At any rate the question was one of fact, and under the well established rules of this court the judgment will not be reversed unless there is greater preponderance of evidence than appears in this case.

Larremore, Ch. J.. and Bischoff, J., concur.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A0 00 7 . RI C HARD E. DANI EL v . ROBERT ADAMS, W ARDEN.

Th e t ri al co urt d en i ed Ri ch ard E. Dan i el ’ s h ab eas co rp u s p et i ti o n. Dan i el t h en

fi led a “ M ot i on t o Set As i de Vo i d J u d g m en t ,” wh ich t he t ri al co u rt co n s t ru ed as a

m o ti o n fo r reco n s i d erat i o n an d l i k ewi s e d en i ed

. D an i el n o w ap peal s to t h is Co u rt

. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Th e u n d erl y i n g su b

ject m at t er o f an ap p eal co n t ro l s o v er th e rel ief s o u g ht in

d et erm i n i n g t h e pro p er ap p el l at e p ro ced u re. R eb i ch v. Mi l es , 2 6 4 Ga. 4 6 7 (4 4 8 SE2 d

1 9 2 ) (1 9 94 ). Th e u n d erl y i n g s u b ject m at t er o f t h i s ap p eal is hab eas co rp u s

. Becau s e

t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er a p p e a l s i n h ab eas co rp us cas es , s ee Ga.

Co n s t

. o f 1 98 3

, Art

. VI, Sec

. VI, Para. III (4 ), Dan iel ’ s ap p eal i s h ereb y

TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su prem e Co u rt fo r d i s p os i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 08/11/2016 August 11, 2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 

          - [CBP Dec. 07-23] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of re-approval of Intertek Caleb Brett, Inc., of Benicia, California, as a commercial gauger and laboratory. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 151.13, Intertek Caleb Brett, Inc., 6050 Egret Court, Benicia, California 94510, has been re-approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils, and to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analysis or gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific tests or gauger services this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *http://www.cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​org_​and_​operations.xml*.                     

# DATES:

The re-approval of Intertek Caleb Brett as a commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 21, 2005. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2008. 

      ( print page 18487)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Eugene J. Bondoc, PhD, or Randall Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060. 

Dated: April 6, 2007. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

 [FR Doc. E7-6905 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
# C_2007282EN.01000802.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4863 — Bain Capital/American Standard)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 282/06)

On 28 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4863. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4863. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
No. 40301.

#### Protests 162842-G, etc., of Henri De Magnin Co. et al (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of yarns in chief value of artificial silk similar to that involved in Abstract 39472. The claim at 40 cents per pound under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Endangered Species the road to recovery

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Endangered Species the road to recovery 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  196 × 65 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  029859278.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Teresa A. Herbert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Independence Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:

1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting .





|/s/Teresa A. Herbert
Teresa A. Herbert
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | Date: | August 12, 2003
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ---------------
#### Ruth H. Smith, Resp’f, *v.*Caroline A. Smith, App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed February 10, 1890.)*

Mortgage—Satisfaction.

Plaintiff was induced by defendant to satisfy a mortgage held against her, on condition that plaintiff should have the interest during her life. *Held,*a contingent gift of the bond and mortgage; that acceptance thereof amounted to a stipulation for performance of the condition subsequent, and that on failure to perform plaintiff was at liberty to revoke the gift and have the bond and mortgage reinstated in full force.

Appeal from judgment setting aside the satisfaction piece of a mortgage.

The parties are sisters, aged respectively sixty-six and seventy years. In 1886, plaintiff was the owner of a mortgage upon defendant’s lands, and claims that defendant, talcing advantage of her ignorance of business matters, induced her to execute a satisfaction piece of said mortgage without paying her. Plaintiff testified that she did not know what a satisfaction piece was until afterward. Defendant’s evidence showed that plaintiff said that all she wanted was the interest due in her life, and that after she .was dead Caroline could have the rest Defendant paid interest for six months, but no more. The court refused to find that there was fraud, but held that it was a conditional gift and that the condition had failed.

*JSJ. R.*Aclcerly, for appl’t; *Thos. J. Ritch, Jr.,*for resp’t.

Dykman, J.

Neither law nor equity will justify any disturbance of the judgment in this action. The plaintiff intended to make a contingent gift of the bond and mortgage to the defendant, but the condition annexed to the present was of vital importance to the plaintiff, and the defendant accepted the donation burdened with the proviso. Such acceptance amounted to a stipulation on the part of the defendant for the performance of the condition subsequent upon which the donation was made, and having violated her agreement to pay interest upon the amount of the mortgage, the plaintiff was at liberty to revoke the gift and have the bond and mortgage reinstated upon the record and restored to her possession in full force and vitality.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Barnard, P. J., and Pratt, J., concur.