alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007164EN.01000501.xml

| 18.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 July 2007

(2007/C 164/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3771 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 168,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4412 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6732 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1613 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6554 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,8 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8845 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,271 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,83 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6973 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7511 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,1279 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,161 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7617 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5755 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,438 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7682 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7398 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0895 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 264,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6166 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4149 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2925 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 469,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7441 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,217 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,073 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,588 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3771

JPY

Japanese yen

168,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4412

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6732

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1613

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6554

ISK

Iceland króna

82,8

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8845

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

28,271

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,83

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6973

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7511

RON

Romanian leu

3,1279

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,161

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7617

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5755

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,438

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7682

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7398

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0895

KRW

South Korean won

1 264,45

ZAR

South African rand

9,6166

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4149

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2925

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 469,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7441

PHP

Philippine peso

62,217

RUB

Russian rouble

35,073

THB

Thai baht

41,588

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Skip to main content

      - Home
      - About
      - Briefing Room          - Releases & Speeches
      - Services          - Citizen Services
        - Business Services
        - Government Services 

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 

## Voices of the Recovery Act: Meet Gail Land 

Ms. Land says "knowing that I could get my crew back to work... was a great feeling.”

## Recovery Act TIGER Grant Announcements

## President Obama delivers on High-Speed Rail

Historic investment jump-starts American high-speed rail and repositions U.S. transportation infrastructure for the 21st century...read blog | read press release

## DOT Mobilizes for  Haiti Relief Efforts 

DOT  agencies are deploying staff, supplies, and providing air and sea support to  aid relief efforts in Haiti...read blog | White House site

## DOT Unveils www.distraction.gov 

The DOT has launched a new website, www.distraction.gov, as well as a national PSA featuring Secretary LaHood to remind drivers to keep their focus....read more

## Special Features

            - Toyota Recall  Information for Consumers
            - FY 2011 Department of Transportation Budget
            - FY 2011 Department of Transportation Budget Estimates 
            - High Speed Rail Plan
            - 2009 DOT Record of Accomplishment 
            - DOT's Disaster Recovery
            - DOT Women and Girls
            - Frequently Asked Questions
            - 2009 H1N1 Information
            - Flight Status
            - Careers in Motion
            - Safety Information

## DOT Operating Administrations & Offices

## Highlights

          - Important Update on DOT Furloughs
          - Budget, Performance & Accountability
          - DOT Recovery
          - Distracted Driving

## Top Requests

          - Motor carrier companies – get a DOT number
          - Find your state transportation department
          - Drug and alcohol testing rules 
          - File a complaint against a trucking company 
          - Find information on car safety, vehicles, and parts 
          - Truckers – hours of service regulations 
          - Air travel problems & complaints  
          - Find info on Hazardous Materials  
          - Traffic & Road Closures 
          - Fraudulent DOT Procurement Letter 
          - Report airline security concerns to TSA 

## Stay Connected

The Fast Lane Blog

Facebook

Twitter

Flickr

YouTube

SUBSCRIBE TO UPDATES

Web Policies & Notices  | Accessibility | FOIA | Privacy   Policy | No Fear Act | Small Business | Ethics | OIG | OIG Hotline | Regulations | Information Quality | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov

U.S. Department of Transportation | 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE | Washington, DC 20590 |  202-366-4000
(Reap. Dec. 8906)

Entry No. 35248, etc.

#### Raylite Electric Corp. *v.*United States

(Decided July 10, 1957)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consist of electric bulbs from Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated herein, less the amount of buying commission as noted on the invoices, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, packing included.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals to re-appraisement enumerated in Schedule A may be submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the amount of buying commission, as noted on the invoices.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Don't drink and drive: don't let this be the reason for your next family gathering

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Don't drink and drive: don't let this be the reason for your next family gathering 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Don't let this be the reason for your next family gathering : don't drink and drive 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  National Black Alcoholism and Addictions Council (U.S.)United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  2000-2010 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  128 × 42 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  053873481.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 26, 2012

h1217 

# Order

December 26, 2012

144741 & (30)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144741

COA: 301685

Oakland CC: 2008

- 220445

- FC

PATRICK CARL JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2011

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for

peremptory reversal is DENIED.
- About ECD
      - Site Map      Help

      - FAQ      Widget
      - Contact Us

ADOPT-A-DOC?

      - Home
      -   •   Basic Search
      -   •   Fielded Search
      -   •   Alerts
      -   •   Document Availability
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Marlin Business Services Corp.
 Date: November 9, 2010
 /s/ Daniel P. DyerDaniel P. DyerChief Executive Officer/s/ Lynne C. WilsonLynne C. WilsonChief Financial Officer &Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### SMITH, Gdn., v. CURRY.

No. 20399.

Opinion Filed March 1, 1932.

Vilas V. Vemor and Whitaker & Whitaker, for plaintiff in error.

Clark & Jack Nichols, for defendant in error.

RILEY, J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining an objection to the confirmation of a sale of real estate under an order of sale issued in a proceeding to foreclose a mortgage.

The objection to confirmation is by the mortgagor and the only question presented by the objection is that mortgagor was entitled to raise was that the land did not sell for a fair value.

At the hearing there was no showing *236whatever that the land did not sell for its fair value. The trial court did not refuse to confirm the sale on that ground. The refusal was based upon the ground that some third person might have an interest in the land and that such third person had not been properly proceeded against in that proper service had not been made upon him.

This question was one in which the objector has no concern. The order of sale, and sale, were regular and in conformity with the law.

In Folsom v. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co., 94 Okla. 181, 221 P. 486, it was held:

> “It is not required on motion for confirmation to look into the judgment or execution further than is necessary to determine whether the officer has properly performed his duty under the writ, nor permitted to decide upon the legality of either. The order of confirmation is an adjudication merely that the proceedings of the officer as they appear of record are regular and a direction to the sheriff to complete the- sale. If the execution is irregular or unauthorized by law, the defendant has his remedy by motion to set it aside, or if it is void, by controverting the title made under it.”

At the sale the land was bid off and sold to the plaintiff, judgment creditor. In such circumstances the question of whether the sale should be confirmed was one of concern to plaintiff only. The defendant Curry, who was the mortgagor, ought not to be heard to complain. Upon the showing made defendant in error was entitled to have the sale confirmed.

The order sustaining the objection to confirmation is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

CLARK, V. C. X, and HEFNER, CULLISON, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. LESTER, C. J., and S WIND ALL, J., absent.
No. 55376.

#### Arthur Jaffe, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 156423-K and 161016-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of lithographic prints, not exceeding twelve one-thousandths of an inch in thickness, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Arthur Jaffe, Inc.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1264). Subsequent to the submission *386of these cases, counsel for the plaintiff specifically waived all claims with respect to the item designated as “Central Park” on the invoice covered by protest ’156423-K. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited authority the claims of the plaintiff were sustained, except as to the above-enumerated item.
February 2 6 , 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JUNG JU CHANG , Appellant
NO. 14

- 13

- 00984

- CV V.

H

- MART HOUSTON, INC. , Appellee

__ ______________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, H

- Mart Houston, Inc., signed October 24, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Jung Ju Chang, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 58152.

protest 215727-K (New York).

#### Pagel, Horton & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*518Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the collector’s letter shows that the importer made proper application to segregate the damaged merchandise and that, as a result of the segregation, 4 bags of 150 packages each were rejected as unusable; that a duty-paid withdrawal was filed which showed an intention to pay duty on all of the imported merchandise, because it showed on the last fine “rejects 4 bags each containing 150 packages” as part of the duty-paid withdrawal; and that in view of this delivery to the importer and because the rejects were not destroyed under customs custody, they became dutiable. In view of the record, it was held that plaintiff failed to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.
#### H. W. Robinson & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6672.

Entry No. 763383.

Invoice dated Yeovil, England, April 15, 1946.

Certified April 16, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 27, 1946.

(Decided December 23, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer .on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 30, 2013

p1030

Order 

Clerk

October 30, 2013

147877 & (27)

TOM BARROW,

Plaintiff,

and 

CITIZENS UNITED AGAINST CORRUPT

GOVERNMENT and D. MICHELLE WHITE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 147877

COA: 317540

Wayne CC: 13-008926-AW

CITY OF DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION,

CITY CLERK FOR THE CITY OF DETROIT, 

MICHAEL DUGGAN, and MICHAEL DUGGAN 

FOR MAYOR COMMITTEE,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions 

presented will cause a “delay in final adjudication . . . likely to cause substantial harm” or 

that “the appeal is from a ruling that a provision of the Michigan Constitution, a 

Michigan statute, a rule or regulation included in the Michigan Administrative Code, or 

any other action of the legislative or executive branch of state government is invalid.” 

MCR 7.302(B)(4). The question of awarding costs is reserved until further order of the 

Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 2, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Short, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 16, 2006



By:

/S/ MICHAEL J. SHORTMichael J. ShortPrincipal Financial Officer
Re: Questions on I540 project 

Ryan F. Brown 

to: 

Jesse Pritts 

05/16/2011 12:58 PM 

Show Details 

History: This message has been replied to. 

Hey Jesse, 

Ive attached a file (Nov 16-17 Summary of Samples I540 NCDOT.docx) similarly as before with all of 

the information you wanted. I assumed you wanted both the inlet and outlet information on both basins.

Also, if the question comes up, there are more times the samplers on the inlet and outlet of basin 3 tried 

to take samples than what was actually obtained physically. This was more than likely due to low flows 

during these times and there not being enough of a pool for the sampler to purge from. 

Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks! 

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:48 AM, <Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov> wrote: 

Thank you Ryan. I have one more question - can you provide the date/time 

of each aliquot and the turbidity of each bottle for 11/16-11/17 

sampling event as well? 

Thanks 

From: "Ryan F. Brown" <ryanfbrown@gmail.com> 

To: Jesse Pritts/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 05/13/2011 01:09 PM 

Subject: Re: Questions on I540 project 

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:55 AM, <Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov> wrote: 

 Thanks Ryan for the responses to my questions. I have two quick 

 follow-up questions: 

 1. The table of turbidity values lists "Turbidity" and "Corrected 

 Turbidity". Could you elaborate on the difference? 

 The turbidity is the actual value from the machine. The corrected 

turbidity includes a calibration factor which is developed by a standard 

curve. The calibration factor is developed about ever month using

Page 1 of 3

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jpritts\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web2670.htm 5/23/2011
No. 38964.

#### Protest 946857-G of Dan Brechner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the .authority of Abstract 31963 the rubber rats and mice in question were held dutiable .at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b) as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of EDUtoons, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eileen Russell, Chief Executive Officer and President of EDUtoons, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: October 13, 2011
By:
/s/ Eileen RussellEileen RussellChief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit
      32.2**














**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**









I,
      Jeffrey T. Fisher, the Chief Financial Officer of CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital
      Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that,
      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
      2006 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:




·
            fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934; and




·
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









/s/
      Jeffrey T. Fisher


Jeffrey
      T. Fisher


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


May
      12,
      2006