alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# e r' ' T 

# Memorandu m

U.S . Departmen t o f IVansportatio n Offic e o f th e Secretar

y o f Transportatio n Subject :

From : Notic e o f

Communicatio n in Docket : DOT-OST-OST-2010-001 8

- laned aCombinatio n Service s 'roceedin g Date : 201 0 V^- ^ Allocation 

# ws k %t m Replyt o Attn , of :

I naccordanc e wit hDepartmen t rule s (1 4 CF

RPar t 300) , I a mreportin g th e followin g communication . O nFebruar y 21,2010 , durin g ameetin g wit hGoverno r Lind aLingl e o

f Hawaii , th e Governo r

raise dth e subjec t

o f th e 201 0 U.S.-Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceeding , emphasizin g th e importanc e t o th e Stat e o

f Hawai i o

f ai r servic e t o Japan . Sh e als o note dtha t bot h Hawaiia n Airline s an dDelt aAi r Line s ha drecentl y file dapplication s fo r servic e t o Haned aairport . I informe dth e Governo r that , whil e I appreciate dhe r interes t i n thi s case , I coul dno t conunen t

o n it s merit s becaus e th e proceedin g wa s unde r activ e consideratio n b y th e Department . Pleas e plac e thi s memorandu mi n th e appropriat e fil e an di n th e Docket .
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     I, Donald T. Chaffee, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer hereby certify that NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.

|   | /s/ Donald T. Chaffee                                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Donald T. Chaffee                                         |
|   | Executive Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer |

Date: August 7, 2009

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin Landis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March 18,   2019 |   | By:                                                                       | /s/   Kevin Landis |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                        |   | **Kevin Landis   Chief Executive Officer*(Principal Executive Officer)*** |

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Omar Billawala, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March 18,   2019 |   | By:                                                                         | /s/   Omar Billawala |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                        |   | **Omar Billawala   Chief Financial Officer*(Principal Financial Officer)*** |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7288

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHNEY FREEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:88-cr-00076-jcc-2)

Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: March 1, 2019

Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johney Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Johney Freeman appeals the district court’s order denying his third motion for a 

sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) based on Amendment 782 to the 

United States Sentencing Guidelines.*

 “We review a district court’s decision to grant or

deny a sentence reduction motion under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion.” United 

States v. Peters, 843 F.3d 572, 577 (4th Cir. 2016). Because our review of the record

reveals no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

 * Although a district court lacks authority to reconsider its ruling on a § 3582(c)(2)

motion, United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), “this 

prohibition [is] non-jurisdictional, and thus waived when the government failed to assert 

it below,” United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir. 2017).
No. 64278.

protest 59/33981 (New York).

#### Naftone, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rangefinders which are parts of cameras, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2007170EN.01002603.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/26

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 May 2007 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-335/06) (1)

1

(Health requirements - Italian market for poultrymeat - Failure of the Commission to take exceptional measures to alleviate the consequences of the epidemic of avian influenza - Action for a declaration of failure to act - Definition of position bringing the failure to act to an end - No need to adjudicate)

(2007/C 170/53)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by G. Aiello, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by C. Cattabriga, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for a declaration of failure to act brought on the basis of Article 232 EC and seeking a declaration that the Commission failed to comply with the obligations imposed on it under Article 14 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (OJ 1975 L 282, p. 77) by failing to adopt exceptional measures to support the market in the poultrymeat sector, in the form of compensation for the producers of day-old chickens affected by veterinary measures taken in order to alleviate the consequences of avian influenza and restricting their movement during the period from December 1999 to September 2003.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action;

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0100. ED JUMPER v. ATLANTA CHASSIS DYNO, INC.

Following plaintiff Ed Jumper’s voluntary dismissal of hislawsuit in this case,

defendant Atlanta Chassis Dyno, Inc. (“Atlanta Chassis”) filed a motion for attorney

fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14. The trial court granted the motion, and Jumper

filed a consolidated “motion in arrest of judgment and motion for new trial,” arguing

that the award of attorney fees was improper. The trial court denied the motions, and

Jumper filed his direct appeal. Atlanta Chassis has moved to dismiss the appeal for

Jumper’s failure to file an application for discretionary appeal. Atlanta is correct that

we lack jurisdiction to review this direct appeal.

Appeals from orders granting or denying attorney fees and litigation expenses

under OCGA § 9-15-14 must be made by discretionary application, not direct appeal. 

See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (10). Jumper’s failure to comply with the discretionary

review procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. See Capricorn Systems

v. Godavarthy, 253 Ga. App. 840 (560 SE2d 730) (2002); Jones v. Padgett, 186 Ga. 

August 26, 2020
App. 362, 363 (2) (367 SE2d 88) (1988). Accordingly, Atlanta Chassis’s motion to

dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/26/2020
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

CHAUNCEY G. ALMONTE,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

ALLIED INTERSTATE CASE NO. C2-11-179

COLLECTION AGENCY, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE NORAH MCCANN KING

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or

trial.

Pursuant to the ORDER filed October 6, 2011, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this action.

Date: October 6, 2011 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00179-EAS-NMK Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/06/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Doran, President and Chief Executive Officer of Doranetti Music Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Doranetti Music Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 13, 2005

/s/ Christopher Doran	Christopher Doran
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Submitted Electronically 

Montague Dixon 

Chair, LDPH Task Force 

Senior Regulatory Product Manager 

Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. 

P.O. Box 18300 

Greensboro, NC 27419 

JAN ~ 3 2014 

Subject: Status of fish early life stage data required for LDPH chemicals 

Dear Mr. Dixon, 

This letter serves as notice to the Light Dependant Peroxidizing Herbicide (LDPH) Task Force 

that the fish early life stage.(ELS) toxicity data requirement has been satisfied. The fish ELS data 

submitted by the Task Force on pyraflufen-ethyl, oxadiazon, and oxyfluorfen are sufficient to 

satisfy the fish ELS data need for all LDPH active ingredients. 

The following table outlines the active ingredients and corresponding Data Call-in numbers for 

which the fish ELS toxicity data requirement (Guideline 850.1400) is now satisfied. Registrants 

responsible for each DCI should be aware that this letter does not satisfy any data requirements 

other than 850.1400 fish ELS toxicity. 

Table 1. Data call-ins for which 850.1400 Fish Early Life Stage Toxicity data are satisfied 

LDPH Active Ineredient DC! Number 

Carfentrazone-ethyl GDCI-128712-26285 

Flufenpyr-ethyl GDCI-108853-26316 

Flumiclorac-pentyl GDCI-128724-26284 

Flumioxazin GDCI-129034-26286 

Fluthiacet-methyl GDCI-108803-26289 

Lactofen GDCI-128888-26320 

Oxadiazon GDCI-109001-24733 

Oxyfluorfen GDCI-111601-17901 

Pyraflufen-ethyl GDCI-030090-26294 

Sodium acifluorfen GDCI-114402-20870 

Sodium Salt of Fomesafen GDCI-123802-26290 
The LDPH task force is composed of the technical registrants Syngenta, Valent, BASF, Bayer, 

Dow, K-1 Chemical, FMC, Nichino, who all agreed to share the costs of conducting the studies 

to satisfy the fish ELS data requirement. UPI and Makhteshim Agan(MANA) have agreed to pay 

for use of the data. 

If you have any questions, please contact Jose Gayoso, Chemical Review Manager, Pesticide Reevaluation Division, at (703) 347-8652 or gayoso.jose@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

~oJI~hid 

Risk Management and Implementation Branch II 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P)
# C_2007183EN.01002202.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/22

---

Action brought on 31 May 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-258/07)

(2007/C 183/38)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicants: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Kukovec and K. Nyberg, acting as Agents)

Applicants:

Defendants: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendants:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts or in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts or in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for implementation of the Directive expired on 31 January 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 114.

1

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28


                                                                 CONFIDENTIAL

                                                             |__| Kelly's Copy
                                                             |__| Company's Copy
                               FIFTH AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

To VINCENT D. KELLY:

By signing below, you agree to an amendment (the "Amendment") to your Employment
Agreement with Metrocall, Inc. (the "Company") dated as of May 15, 1996 (the
"Employment Agreement") as previously amended. The Fifth Amendment is effective
as of April 1, 2001.

         New language in the Employment Agreement is shown as amended:

         Section 8(d)(v), as amended, reads:

                           "(v) the termination of employment of either William
                           L. Collins, III or Steven D. Jacoby (I) by the
                           Company without "Cause," or (II) by Collins or Jacoby
                           for "Good Reason" as that term is defined and applied
                           in their respective employment agreements."

         The Employment Agreement, except as amended and modified above, remains
in effect.

                                             METROCALL, INC.



Date:                               By:   /s/FRANCIS A. MARTIN, III
    ------------------                 -----------------------------------------
                                          Francis A. Martin, III
                                          Chairman of the Compensation Committee


Date:                               By:   /s/VINCENT D. KELLY
    ------------------                 -----------------------------------------
                                          Vincent D. Kelly
No. 47472.

#### Protests 847251-G, etc., of Ampol, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highland Hospitality Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James L. Francis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

Date: May 6, 2005
#### M. Cornelia Brown, *Appellant, v.*Benjamin F. Van Camp, *Respondent, Impleaded,*with others.

— Reargument ordered.
CONSENT OF SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN, LLP











	Exhibit 10(b)



	CONSENT OF SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN,
      LLP



	We hereby consent to the reference to
our firm included in the prospectus and statement of additional information of
Mercury Index Funds, Inc. filed as part of Registration Statement No. 333-88405
and to the use of our opinion of counsel, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
9 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-lA
(File No. 333-88405).




	/s/ Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, LLP

       Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, LLP





	New York, New York 

      April   , 2001