### 57215 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 17, 2013 / Notices

1 This mission is also referred to as OrbD–1. See Letter from Mark A. Wright, Manager, Safety Inspection Division AST, to Natalie Imfeld, Contracts Manager, Advanced Programs Group Orbital Sciences Corporation (August 16, 2013) (on file with FAA) (referring to Antares launch of the Cygnus payload as ORB–D1 Mission). 2 Space Station—Here we Come! NASA Press
Release: http://www.nasa.gov/audience/ foreducators/station-here-we-come.html (last visited August 16, 2013).

3 Nonreimbursable Space Act Agreement Between NanoRacks, LLC and NASA for Operation of the NanoRacks System Aboard the International Space Station National Laboratory, (Sept. 4 and 9 2009) (NanoRacks Agreement), 387938main—SAA—
SOMD—6355—NanoRacks—ISS—National— Lab.pdf.

4 OrbD–1 refers to the COTS Demo mission currently scheduled to launch in September on the Antares launch vehicle from Wallops. See Letter from Mark A. Wright, Manager, Safety Inspection Division AST, to Natalie Imfeld, Contracts Manager, Advanced Programs Group Orbital Sciences Corporation (August 16, 2013) (on file with author) (referring to Antares launch of the Cygnus payload as ORB–D1 Mission). Issued in Washington, DC. on September 4,

2013. Joe Hebert, Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch.

[FR Doc. 2013–22557 Filed 9–16–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Waiver of Requirement To Enter Into a Reciprocal Waiver of Claims**  **Agreement With All Customers for Orbital Sciences Corporation** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of waiver.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice concerns a petition for waiver submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) by Orbital Sciences Corporation (Orbital) to waive in part the requirement that a launch operator enter into a reciprocal waiver of claims with each customer. The FAA grants the petition.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For technical questions concerning this waiver, contact Charles P. Brinkman, Licensing Program Lead, Commercial Space Transportation—Licensing and Evaluation Division, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–7715; email: Phil.Brinkman@faa.gov. For legal questions concerning this waiver,contact Sabrina Jawed, AttorneyAdviser, Space Law Branch, AGC–250, Office of the Chief Counsel, Regulations Division, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267–8839; email: Sabrina.Jawed@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Background

On August 8, 2013, Orbital submitted a petition to the FAA’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) requesting a waiver under its launch license for flight of an Antares launch vehicle carrying Orbital’s Cygnus
module. 1 Orbital requested a partial waiver of 14 CFR 440.17, which requires a licensee to enter into a reciprocal waiver of claims (a ‘‘cross-waiver’’) with
each of its customers.

The FAA licenses the launch of a launch vehicle and reentry of a reentry vehicle under authority granted to the Secretary of Transportation by the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended and re-codified by 51 U.S.C. Subtitle V, chapter 509 (Chapter 509), and delegated to the FAA Administrator
and the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation, who exercises licensing authority under Chapter 509.

The petition for waiver applies to Orbital’s September 2013 launch of an
Antares launch vehicle and Orbital’s Cygnus pressurized cargo module to be used in the delivery of cargo to the International Space Station (ISS). The Cygnus cargo module will carry cargo for NASA to resupply the ISS. In addition to the ISS supplies, the Antares may also carry other payloads whose transport NASA has arranged as part of the Johnson Space Center cargo. These consist of a NanoRacks, LLC, and
NanoRacks locker insert and student experiments created under NASA’s Student Spaceflight Experiments Program (SSEP). NASA describes SSEP as a national science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education

initiative. 2 According to its Space Act Agreement with NASA, 3 NanoRacks arranges to carry the student experiments on a locker insert to put into an experimental locker on board the ISS. The Space Act Agreement states that NASA will provide on-orbit
resources and limited launch opportunities to NanoRacks for the launch of its insert and the experiments the insert carries. Orbital provided the FAA, along with its petition for waiver, a letter signed by Christopher Cummins, Chief Operating Officer of NanoRacks, stating that NanoRacks will not have any personnel at the launch site for the
OrbD–1 4 launch, which is the launch that is the subject of this waiver. NanoRacks and each student who places a payload on board the NanoRacks insert qualify as customers
under the FAA’s definitions. Section 440.3 defines a customer, in relevant part, as any person with rights in the payload or any part of the payload, or any person who has placed property on board the payload for launch, reentry, or payload services. A person is an individual or an entity organized or existing under the laws of a State or country. 51 U.S.C. 50901(12), 14 CFR 401.5. The subjects of this waiver are persons because the students are individuals and NanoRacks is an entity, a limited liability corporation. Accordingly, because NanoRacks and the students are persons who have rights in their respective payloads, the locker insert and the experiments, due to their ownership of those objects, and because they have placed property on board, they are customers. Section 440.17 requires their signatures as

customers.

In this instance, however, NanoRacks and the students are also subject to a NASA reciprocal waivers of claims, a cross-waiver, which is governed by NASA’s regulations at 14 CFR part 1266. Article 8 of the Space Act Agreement between NASA and NanoRacks governs liability and risk of loss and establishes a cross-waiver of liability.

Other than the NanoRacks and SSEP customers, all other customers as defined by 14 CFR 440.3 will execute the cross-waivers required by 14 CFR 440.17. The cross-waivers among Orbital and all customers, other than NanoRacks and SSEP customers, are amended to provide that signing customers waive claims against any other customer as defined by 14 CFR 440.3. The petition for partial waiver of the requirement that the licensee implement a cross-waiver with each customer applies to NanoRacks and the
SSEP customers as customers of the September 2013 launch of the Antares launch vehicle carrying the Cygnus
module.

Waiver Criteria

Chapter 509 allows the FAA to waive a license requirement if the waiver (1) will not jeopardize public health and safety, safety of property; (2) will not jeopardize national security and foreign policy interests of the United States; and (3) will be in the public interest. 51 U.S.C. 50905(b)(3) (2013); 14 CFR 404.5(b) (2013).


### 57216 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 17, 2013 / Notices

5 Indemnification by the U.S. Government is conditioned upon the passage of legislation. 51 U.S.C. 50915; 14 CFR 440.17(d).

6 Waiver of Requirement to Enter Into a Reciprocal Waiver of Claims Agreement With All Customers, Notice of Waiver, 77 FR 63221 (Oct. 16, 2012). 1 General Motors, LLC is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and is registered under the laws of the state of Michigan. Waiver of FAA Requirement for Each Customer To Sign a Reciprocal Waiver
of Claims

The FAA waives 14 CFR 440.17, which requires a licensee to enter into a reciprocal waiver of claims with each of its customers with respect to NanoRacks and the SSEP participants for the September 2013 Antares launch.

In 1988, as part of a comprehensive financial responsibility and risk sharing regime that protects launch participants
and the U.S. Government from the risks of catastrophic loss and litigation, Congress required that all launch participants agree to waive claims against each other for their own property damage or loss, and to cover losses experienced by their own employees. 51 U.S.C. 50915(b). This part of the regime was intended to relieve launch participants of the burden of obtaining property insurance by having each party be responsible for the loss of its own property and to limit the universe of claims that might arise as a result of a launch. H. Rep. 100–639, at 11–12 (1988); S. Rep. 100–593, at 14, (1988); Financial Responsibility Requirements for Licensed Launch Activities, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 61 FR 38992, 39011 (Jul. 25, 1996). The FAA’s implementing regulations may be found at 14 CFR part

440.

In its request for a waiver, Orbital submits that the NASA Space Act Agreement reciprocal waivers of claims imposed on NanoRacks and the SSEP participants are equivalent to the requirements imposed on each customer under the FAA’s requirements of 14 CFR part 440. A comparison of the two regimes shows that in this particular
situation the two sets of cross-waivers are sufficiently similar that the statutory goals of 51 U.S.C. 50914(b) will be met by the FAA agreeing to accept the
NASA cross-waivers in this instance.

The FAA cross-waivers require the launch participants, including the U.S. Government and each customer, and their respective contractors and subcontractors, to waive and release claims against all the other parties to the waiver and agree to assume financial responsibility for property damage sustained by that party and for bodily injury or property damage sustained by the party’s own employees, and to hold harmless and indemnify each other from bodily injury or property damage sustained by their respective employees resulting from the licensed activity, regardless of fault. 14 CFR 440.17(b) and (c). Each party 5 to the cross-waiver must indemnify the other parties from claims by the indemnifying party’s
contractors and subcontractors if the indemnifying party fails to properlyextend the requirements of the crosswaivers to its contractors and subcontractors. 14 CFR 440.17(d). A comparison of each element shows that, although there are some differences, because the NASA cross-waiver signed by NanoRacks is consistent with Congressional intent and the FAA’s regulations, because relevant employees will not be present at the launch site,
and because the Orbital cross-waiver
submitted to the FAA has been amended to protect non-signing customers, NanoRacks and the SSEPparticipants need not sign a crosswaiver under 14 CFR part 440.

For the reasons stated in the waiver the FAA published for SpaceX on October 16, 2012, 6 and for the reasons stated above, the FAA finds that this waiver implicates no safety, national security or foreign policy issues. The waiver is consistent with the public interest goals of Chapter 509. Under 51 U.S.C. 50914, Congress determined that it was necessary to reduce the costs associated with insurance and litigation by requiring launch participants, including customers, to waive claims against each other. Because the NanoRacks Agreement under 14 CFR part 1266 accomplishes these goals by the same or similar means, the FAA finds this request in the public interest, and grants the waiver with respect to NanoRacks and the SSEP participants in reliance on the representations Orbital made in its petition.

Issued in Washington, DC, on September

10, 2013. Kenneth Wong,
Commercial Space Transportation, Licensing and Evaluation Division Manager.

[FR Doc. 2013–22566 Filed 9–16–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**National Highway Traffic Safety**
**Administration**

**[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0165; Notice 1]**

**General Motors, LLC, Receipt of**
**Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance** 

**AGENCY :**  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

**ACTION :**  Receipt of petition.

**SUMMARY :**  General Motors, LLC (GM) 1 has determined that certain model year (MY) 2011 through 2013 Buick Regal
and MY 2013 Chevrolet Malibu passenger cars may not fully comply with the telltale bulb outage requirement found in paragraph S5.5.6 of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment. GM has filed an appropriate report dated October 3, 2012, pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.

**DATES :**  October 17, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and be submitted by any of the following methods:

• Mail: Send by mail addressed to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

• Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by hand to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.

• Electronically: Submit comments electronically by: logging onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at http:// www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Comments may also be faxed to (202)

493–2251.

Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If