alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE 283RD DISTRIC T COURT OF DALLAS CO UNTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 17th day of July, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined;
and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Jarvis Demoan Fisher, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 14

- 00231

- CR

Trial Court No. F14

- 53102

- T

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Jarvis Demoan Fisher, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said C ourt of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 11th day of September , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
#### Cosmos Shipping Co., Inc., *v.*United States

No. 7350.

Invoice dated London, England, June 26, 1946.

Certified July 2, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 1, 1946.

Entry No. 708987.

(Decided July 23, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

JEROME RICHARDSON, 

Petitioner, CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01139

JUDGE SMITH

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ABEL

WARDEN, WARREN CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION, 

Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER

On December 21, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be

dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been field. 

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby

DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 \s\ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH

United States District Judge

 

Case: 2:10-cv-01139-GCS-MRA Doc #: 16 Filed: 01/24/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007255EN.01003301.xml

| 27.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/33

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 October 2007

(2007/C 255/09)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4384 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 164,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4549 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70100 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1800 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6732 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,85 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7095 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,962 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7021 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,6309 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3541 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,291 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7161 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5734 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3830 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1488 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8792 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0927 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 308,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3630 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7845 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3449 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 121,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8122 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,372 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,5790 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,626 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4384

JPY

Japanese yen

164,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4549

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70100

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1800

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6732

ISK

Iceland króna

86,85

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7095

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

26,962

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7021

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,6309

RON

Romanian leu

3,3541

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,291

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7161

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5734

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3830

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1488

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8792

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0927

KRW

South Korean won

1 308,94

ZAR

South African rand

9,3630

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7845

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3449

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 121,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8122

PHP

Philippine peso

63,372

RUB

Russian rouble

35,5790

THB

Thai baht

45,626

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Principal Amount: $50,000 Date: June 23, 2014
 
 CO N VE R T IB L E P R O MI S S O RY  N OT E
 
 E xce l s i s  Inv e s tme n t s,  Inc . ,  A RR G  C orp . ,
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
 C onvers i on  Ri gh t p r o v i d ed,  ho w ever, p r o v i d e d fur t her,  ho w ever,
 
 p l us p l us p l us
 
 C onv e r s i on  Pr i ce
 
 C a l c u l a ti on  of Con v er s i on Pr i ce ( T he s h ares  to be  i ssued purs u ant  to  c onvers i ons a r e  su b ject  to  the l e gal  op i n i on l etter,  c u s tom a ry  and sat i s fa c t o r y  to  pa r t i es  h ereto  as  p rov i ded by  the Ho l d e r . )
 
 
 
 
 
  
 C o nvers i o n  Pr i ce  D ur i ng Ma j o r  An n ounce m en t s
 
 A u t hor i zed  S h are s
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
   
 M e t h o d  of  C o nvers i o n
 
 Mech a n i c s  of C onvers i on
 
 pr i ma  f ac i e,
 
 Pa y me n t  of  Ta x e s
 
 
 
 
 
  
 D e l i very  of  C o m m on  S t ock  U pon  Co n vers i o n
 
 Ob li ga t i on  of  B or r o wer  t o  D e li ver  C o mm on  S t oc k
 
 D e l i v ery  of  C o m m on  S t ock  by  E l ec t ron i c  Transfe r
 
 Fa i l u r e  t o  D e l i ver  Co mm on  S t ock  P r i or  t o  Dea d l i ne
 
 
 
 
 
  
 1 . 5  Co n cern i n g  t he  S h are s
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
 E ffect of  Cer t a i n E ven ts
 
 Effect  of  Merger,  C onso li da t i on,  E tc
 
 A d j us t m ent  D ue t o Merger,  C onso l i d a t i on,  E t c
  
 
 
 
 
 A d j us tm ent  D u e  t o  D i s t r i bu ti o n
 
 A d j us t m e n t  D u e  t o  Di l u t i ve  I ssu a nc e
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Purch a se  R i gh ts
 
 N o t i ce  o f  Ad j us tm en t s
 
 Trad i ng  Market  L im i t a t i o ns
 
 S t a t us  as S hareho l de r
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Prepay m en t
 
  
 Di s t r i bu t i o n s  on  Ca p i t al  S t oc k
 
 Res t r i c ti on  on  S t o ck  R epurc h ase s
 
 B o r ro wi ngs
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Sa l e  of  A sse t s
 
 A dva n ces  a n d  L oan s
 
  Fa i l u r e  t o  Pay  Pr i nc i pal  or  In t eres t
 
 C onvers i on and  t he Share s
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Breach  o f  C ovena n t s
 
 Breach of Re p r ese n t a ti ons and Warran t i e s
 
 R ece i ver  or  Trus t e e
 
 Ju d g m en t s
 
 B a nkrup t cy
 
 D e l i s t i ng  of  C o m m o n  S t ock
 
 F a i l ure  t o  C o m p l y  w i t h  t he  E xchange  A c t
  
 L i qu i da t i o n
 
 C es s a t i on  of  O pera t i o ns
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Ma i n t enance  o f  A sse ts
 
 F i nanc i al S t a t e m ent R es t a t e m en t
 
 Rev e r se  Sp li t s
 
 R ep l ace m ent  of  T r a n s f er  A g en t
 
 Cross- D efau l t
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 t im es t sum p l us p l us p l us ( z)  p l us m u l t i p l i ed  by
 
  
  
 Fa i l ure  or I n d u l g ence  N ot  W a i ve r
 
 N o ti ce s
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
      
  
     
 A me n d m en t s
 
 A s s i gna b i li t y bo n a f i de
 
 Cost of  C o l l e c t i on
 
 G o vern i n g  La w f o r u m  n on con v en i e ns.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 C er t a i n  A mo u n t s
 
 N o t i c e  of  Corpora t e  E ven ts
 
 R e m ed i e s
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  By: Brian McFadden
 Title: Chief Executive Officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Nelson Martinez, Plaintiff-Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>NY1 Transmission Inc., Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Llinet M. Rosado, J.), entered on or about March 31, 2016, after trial, in favor of plaintiff and awarding him damages in the principal sum of $2,065.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment (Llinet M. Rosado, J.), entered on or about March 31, 2016, affirmed, without costs.</p><p>The record establishes that the trial court applied appropriate rules and principles of substantive law and accomplished "substantial justice" in awarding judgment in plaintiff's favor (CCA 1804, 1807). A fair interpretation of the evidence, including the testimony of plaintiff and his automotive expert, supports the finding that defendant failed to properly repair the transmission of plaintiff's vehicle. Particularly in the context of small claims cases, the decision of the fact-finding court is entitled to deference where it rests in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000], <i>lv dismissed</i> 95 NY2d 898 [2000]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: March 16, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2010-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName: Jason KulasTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: September 20, 2013
Case: 2:11-cv-00218-EAS-EPD Doc #: 27 Filed: 10/07/11 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00218-EAS-EPD Doc #: 27 Filed: 10/07/11 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T10:50:16-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**Certification by the Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ChinaCache International Holdings, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Song Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 
|   | (1)    | The Report fully   complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The information   contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the   financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
| Date:  | April 26, 2013                                                                                |   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                                                                                          |   |   |
| By:    |              /s/   Song Wang |   |   |
| Name:  | Song Wang                                                                                     |   |   |
|   |                                                                                          |   |   |
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer                                                                       |   |   |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. GARY LEWIS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 638 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 27th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# [Six United States Air Force aircraft, Thunderbirds]

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  [Six United States Air Force aircraft, Thunderbirds] 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Picture of aircraft used by the Air Force, flying over snowy mountains. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Air Force. ThunderbirdsUnited States. Department of the Air Force 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  128 × 36 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  057210800.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 40279.

#### Protest 668664-G of Maritime Inspecting & Forwarding Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Myers*v. *United States*(T. D. 49530) the claim was sustained that duty was taken on the basis of board measurement in excess of the actual measurement of the imported lumber.
No. 65631.

#### J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

protest 60/17395(A) (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of recording tapes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Electric & Musical Industries (US), Ltd.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 2070), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 48637.

#### Protests 836782-G, etc., of William Faehndrich, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146 a 21⁄4 percent allowance was made in the weight of cheese stipulated to be similar to that involved therein, and an allowance of 1 percent was made in the weight of Reggiano cheese similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*Protests sustained to that extent.
**Exhibit 8.1**

List of Subsidiaries 

China Gateway Life Science (Holdings) Limited — Incorporated in HongKong 

ChemExplorer Company Limited — Incorporated in Hong Kong 

Shanghai ChemPartner Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Shanghai ChemExplorer Co., Ltd.— Incorporated in the PRC 

Shanghai PharmaExplorer Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

China Gateway Technology Development (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

China Gateway Pharmaceutical Development Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

ChengduChempartner Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

 
1
# C_2007245EN.01000602.xml

| 19.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4845 — Santander/ABN AMRO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 245/04)

On 19 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4845. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4845. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# C_2007155EN.01002302.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/23

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 May 2007 — Henkel KGaA v OHIM — SERCA(COR)

(Case T-342/05) (1)

1

(‘Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark COR - Earlier national figurative mark including the word element “dor’ in gothic script - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94’)

(2007/C 155/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant(s): Henkel KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by C. Osterrieth, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by A. Folliard-Monguiral then by G. Schneider, agents)

Defendant(s):

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Serra Y Roca, SA (SERCA) (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action for annulment brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 July 2005 (Case R 556/2003-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Henkel KGaA and Serra y Roca, SA (SERCA).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296 of 26.11.2005.

1

---