alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:11-CR-123

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

WILLIAM F. LAKE, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On October 21, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant William F. Lake’s guilty

plea to Count One of the Information charging him with conspiracy to distribute 100 kilograms or

more of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B) and 21 U.S.C. § 846

(Doc. 16). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a

District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had

a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:11-cr-00123-GCS Doc #: 18 Filed: 11/29/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

conspiracy to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:11-cr-00123-GCS Doc #: 18 Filed: 11/29/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

F.D. MITCHELL, M.K. JAMISON, J.P. LISIECKI

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ANGELORAUL R. CASA

AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT TECHNICIAN FIRST C LASS (E

- 6),

U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201400075

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 8 November 2013

. Military Judge: CDR Lewis T. Booker, Jr., JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, USS JOHN C.

STENNIS (CVN 74)

. Staff Judge Advocate's Recomme ndation: LCDR Clifton

Hutchinson, JAGC, USN

. For Appellant: Capt David A. Peters, USMC.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq

.

8 May 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

------------------------------------ ---------------

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

Fo r the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 1 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 2 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 3 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 4 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 5 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 6 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 7 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 8 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 9 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 10 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 11 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00325-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/27/12 Page: 12 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T14:59:51-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Sandra Malcom, Committee Management Specialist, NCEH/ATSDR, 1600 Clifton Road, Mail Stop E-28, Atlanta, Georgia 30303; telephone 404/498-0003, fax 404/498-0622; E-mail:                         *smalcom@cdc.gov*. The deadline for notification of attendance is May 4, 2007.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both CDC and NCEH/ATSDR.                     

Dated: April 2, 2007. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 [FR Doc. E7-6585 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# C_2007212EN.01000102.xml

| 11.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4672 — E.ON/Endesa Europa/Viesgo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 212/02)

On 6 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4672. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4672. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
Before the First Division,

October 11, 1945

No. 50573.

#### Protests 104534-K, etc., of Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 10199)

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 12625; 2778.

(Decided March 15, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Norman O. Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*William E. Orrieh, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(Morris Braverman,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise described on the invoices covered by the above entitled appeals for reappraisement was appraised on the basis of the American selling price as defined in Section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and is the

> *584same in all material respects as the merchandise 'the subject of *Bluefries New York Inc. v. United States,*C.D. 1909, in which this Court held the appraisement to be void since classification was under the provisions of paragraph 75 of the Act.

> 2. On or about the date of exportation of the merchandise here involved, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, at a price of Dutch florins 10.15 per U.S. gallon, net, packed.

> 3. On or about the said date of exportation, the export value or that value as defined in Section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 was no higher.

> 4. The record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein, and the above-entitled appeals may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value is Dutch florins 10.15 per United States gallon, net, packed, in each case.

As to all other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 14, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130073 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver WAPEKA B. BARNE TT, Personal Marilyn Kelly Representative of the Estate of James Otha Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Barnett, III, Deceased, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 130073 COA: 255318 Oakland CC: 2001-030478-NH CESAR D. HIDALGO, M.D., CESAR D. HIDALGO, M.D., P.C., Defendants-Appellants, and

RENATO ALBARAN, M.D., and RENATO ALBARAN, M.D., P.C., Defendants-Appellees, and

MUSKESH S. SHAH, M.D., ONCOLOGY & HEMATOLOGY OF OA KLAND, P.C., CRITTENTON HOSPITAL, and CRITTENTON CORPORATION, Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether Brewer v Payless Stations, Inc , 412 Mich 673 (1982), and Clery v Sherwood , 151 Mich App 55 (1986), ha ve continuing vitality in light of MCL 600. 6304 and MCL 600.2957, which requi re the finder of fact to determine and apportion the liability of non-parties.

The Michigan Trial Lawyers Associati on and Michigan Defense Trial Counsel,
Inc. are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or gr oups interested in the determination of the issues p resented in this case may move the Court for permission to
file briefs amicus curiae.

t0907 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 14, 2006

Clerk
Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 1 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 2 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 3 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 4 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 5 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 6 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 7 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 8 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 9 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 10 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 11 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00244-EAS-NMK Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/26/13 Page: 12 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T10:57:23-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Mark Newcomer, the Chief Executive Officer of Paysign, Inc., a Nevada corporation(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

1. The amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/Afor the period ended December 31, 2021 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

*/s/ Mark Newcomer*

Mark Newcomer,

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)

 

Date: May 2, 2022
#### The Everglades Cypress Company and Miriam Mays Lee, *et vir,*v. John Porter Tyner, sometimes known as John P. Tyner, and sometimes known as J. Porter Tyner, *et al.*

179 So. 764.

Division B.

Opinion Filed March 8, 1938.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1938.

*George P.*Garrett, for Appellants;

*Cassels & Trinkle,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

The above entitled cause having been submitted upon the transcript of the record and briefs and argument of counsel, and the Court having considered the defense of payment of the note and mortgage, and there appearing ample testimony in the record to support the conclusions of the Chancellor below, the Court is of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the order appealed from should be affirmed. In the case of Farrington v. Harrison, 95 Fla. 769, 116 So. 497, this Court said:

> “We also bear in mind the oft reiterated rule that while the findings of the chancellor on the facts where the evidence is heard by him, and the witnesses are before him, are entitled to more weight in the Appellate Court than where such findings are made in a cause where the testimony was not taken before the chancellor, yet in either case *741the chancellor’s findings should not be disturbed by an Appellate Court unless shown to be clearly erroneous. Sandlin v. Hunter Co., 70 Fla. 514, 70 South. Rep. 553; Travis v. Travis, 81 Fla. 309, 87 South. Rep. 762; Lucas v. Wade, 43 Fla. 419, 31 South. Rep. 23.

> “On the other hand, where a decree is manifestly against the weight of the evidence or contrary to and unsupported by the legal effect of the evidence, then it becomes the duty of the Appellate Court to reverse such decree. Carr v. Leslie, 73 Fla. 233, 74 South. Rep. 207; Florida National Bank v. Sherouse, 80 Fla. 405, 86 South. Rep. 279; Gill v. Chappelle, 71 Fla. 479, 71 South. Rep. 836; Lightsey v. Washington Park Properties, 112 South. Rep. 555.”

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
# C_2007211EN.01002902.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/29

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour Administrative d'appel de Lyon (France) lodged on 17 July 2007 — Régie Networks v Direction de Contrôle fiscal Rhône-Alpes Bourgogne

(Case C-333/07)

(2007/C 211/55)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour Administrative d'appel de Lyon (Administrative Appeal Court, Lyon)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Régie Networks

Applicant:

Defendant: Direction de Contrôle fiscal Rhône-Alpes Bourgogne

Defendant:

Question referred

Is Commission Decision No 679/97 of 10 November 1997 by which the Commission decided not to raise any objections to the alterations made to the system of aid to radio broadcasting introduced by Decree No 92-1053 (1) valid in respect of (1) the statement of reasons, (2) the assessment made as to the compatibility with the EC Treaty of the funding scheme for aid to radio broadcasting which was established for the period 1998-2002 and (3) the ground relating to the lack of any increase in the budgetary resources of the system of aid at issue?

1

---

(1)  Decree No 92-1053 of 30 September 1992 renewing a special tax for the benefit of funds to support radio broadcasting, JORF No 228, of 1 October 1992, and Decree No 97-1263 of 29 December 1997 creating a special tax for the benefit of funds to support radio broadcasting, JORF No 302, of 30 September 1997, p. 191914.

1

---
#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States

No. 7329.

Invoices dated Courtrai, Belgium, June 20, 1938, etc.

Certified June 23, 1938, etc.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., August 1, 1938, etc.

Entry No. 777, etc.

(Decided July 11, 1947)

*Philip Btein*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the court, as follows:

> (1) That the merchandise, cotton rugs from Belgium, and the issues involved in the Reappraisement Appeals 129853-A-4960 etc., listed in annexed Schedule A, which is referred to and made a part of this stipulation, are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issues which were passed upon in the case of *United States*v. *Stephen Rug Mills, Inc.,*Reappraisements 131005-A etc., Reap. Dec. 6283, wherein it was held that there was no foreign value for the merchandise; that export value was the proper basis for determining dutiable value, and that the export values for the merchandise were the entered values.

> (2) That the record in said case, Reappraisements 131005-A etc., Reap. Dec. 6283, may be and hereby is received in evidence as a part of the record in this case.

> *212(3) That the prices at the time of exportation of the merchandise in suit to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, are the appraised values less the amounts added on entry because of advances made by the appraiser in other cases then pending on appeal for reappraisement.

> (4) The appeals listed in the annexed schedule A are hereby submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the amounts added on entry because of advances made by the appraiser in other cases then pending on appeal for reappraisement.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8919 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

151 Highway 74 South in Peachtree City, Georgia, as the ‘‘SFC Shawn 

McCloskey Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 2, 2024 

Mr. FERGUSON (for himself, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. 

LOUDERMILK, Mr. CLYDE, Ms. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. 

ALLEN, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. MCCORMICK, Mrs. MCBATH, Mr. 

DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, and Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 151 Highway 74 South in Peachtree City, 

Georgia, as the ‘‘SFC Shawn McCloskey Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SFC SHAWN MCCLOSKEY POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 151 Highway 74 South in Peach6 tree City, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘SFC Shawn McCloskey Post Office’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8919 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘SFC Shawn McClos5 key Post Office’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth S. Klipper, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer
and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



Dated: November 10, 2008

/s/ KENNETH S. KLIPPER Kenneth S. Klipper Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and will be retained by The First Marblehead Corporation
and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks