alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED
STATES

SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549



|FORM 8-K
|--------

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934

Date
of Report: May 14, 2004



|(Date of Earliest
      Event Reported)
|---------------------------------------

CARTOON ACQUISITION, INC.

(Exact Name of
Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware
    
    000-50411
    
    20-0269287(State or Other
      Jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (I. R. S.
      EmployerOf
      Incorporation)
    
    File
      Number)
    
    Identification
      Number)24300 Chagrin BoulevardSuite 210Cleveland, Ohio
    
    44122(Address of
      Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip
      Code)


Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code:

(216)
514-5997

---

ITEM
5. OTHER EVENTS AND REQUIRED FD DISCLOSURE.

Effective at the close of business on May 14, 2004, Cartoon
Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company") has implemented a reverse stock split by
converting each block of 1,240,000 shares of its common stock, par value $.0001
per share (the "Common Stock"), issued and outstanding as of such date into one
share of Common Stock.

The
Company's sole director and sole stockholder approved the reverse stock split on
May 14, 2004. The Company has implemented the reverse stock split at the ratio
of 1-for-1,240,000, causing each outstanding block of 1,240,000 shares of the
Common Stock to automatically convert into one share of Common Stock and
reducing the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding from approximately
1,240,000 to one. The par value of the Company's Common Stock will remain at
$.0001 per share and the number of authorized shares will remain at 100,000,000
shares of Common Stock.

ITEM
7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

|a. | Financial Statements of Business Acquired. Not
      Applicable.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|b. | Pro
      forma Financial Information. Not Applicable.          
|  
|c. | Exhibits. None.                                                 
|  



|SIGNATURES
|----------

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

CARTOON ACQUISITION, INC./s/
      James W. MarguliesMay 18, 2004
    
    JAMES W. MARGULIESPresident, Secretary andTreasurer


---
# C_2007247EN.01003902.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/39

---

Action brought on 3 September 2007 — UPS Europe and UPS Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-329/07)

(2007/C 247/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: UPS Europe NV/SA (Brussels, Belgium) and UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG (Neuss, Germany) (represented by: T. Ottervanger and E. Henny, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | To declare in accordance with Article 232 EC that the Commission has failed to act by not having defined a position with respect to the applicants' complaint lodged with the Commission on 11 May 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

To declare in accordance with Article 232 EC that the Commission has failed to act by not having defined a position with respect to the applicants' complaint lodged with the Commission on 11 May 2004;

| — | to order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicants in the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

to order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicants in the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants claim that the Commission has failed to act by not having defined its position after having been invited to do so under Article 232 EC on the applicants' complaint lodged with the Commission on 11 May 2004 regarding unlawful state aid allegedly granted to Deutsche Post by Germany in form of among others state guarantees, contributions to Deutsche Post's pension fund and exemption from various statutory obligations.

In support of their application, the applicants submit that the Commission is required to conduct a diligent and impartial examination of the complaint received in particular in the light of the Commission's exclusive jurisdiction to assess the compatibility of aid measures with the common market.

The applicants further submit that Article 232 EC must be interpreted as entitling individuals or undertakings to bring an action for failure to act against an institution for failure to adopt measures which would have been of direct and individual concern to them, even though they are not the potential addressees of these measures.

Finally, the applicants contend that the measures which the Commission failed to adopt can be considered to be of direct and individual concern to the applicants as competing undertakings of Deutsche Post.

---
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 11, 2015

N o. 04

- 12

- 00430

- CR

Charles ARRINGTON

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR1663

Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant’s Motion for Leave to File Post

- Remand Memorandum of Law is GRANTED.

Appellant’s request that this appeal be submitted for oral argument is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on the 11 th day of March , 201 5

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

**HAN KUN LAW OFFICES**

 

April 21, 2011

 

**ChinaCache International Holdings Ltd.**

Scotia Center, 4th Floor, P.O. Box 2804,

George Town, Cayman Islands, British West Indies

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

We consent to the reference to our firm in ChinaCache International Holdings Ltd.’s Form 20-F, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in the month of April, 2011.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 
| /s/   HAN KUN LAW OFFICES |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| HAN   KUN LAW OFFICES     |   |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1099
L. RUTHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WEICHERT REAL ESTATE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00668-JRS) Submitted: April 19, 2007 Decided: April 24, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lawrence Ruther appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Weichert Real Estate, Inc. , No. 3:06-cv-00668-JRS (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 10, 2006 & entered Oct. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 46856.

#### Petition 6018-R of Edwin Leffler (Savannah).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

At the hearing the petitioner testified that these rugs were bought for him in the open market, through purchasing agents, at what he believed to be the prevailing price. He stated the price he paid was the invoiced and entered value and that prior to entry ho made no investigation to ascertain the correct market value of the merchandise, relying, as he had in the past, solely on the prices given in the commercial and consular invoices and on the prices he paid. After the advance was made by the appraiser he wrote to Belgium for information and received in reply an affidavit not properly signed, which was therefore useless in the prosecution of his reappraisement appeal. On the record the court was satisfied that the petitioner acted in good faith, and since the record disclosed no fact or circumstance known by the petitioner or which ought to have been known by him which would put him upon inquiry as to whether the prices actually paid were less than the market value of the g'oods, the petition was granted, citing *Vietor*v. *United States*(14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 13, T. D. 41529).
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Do you have to get hit over the head to realize it's smart to wear a helmet?

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Do you have to get hit over the head to realize it's smart to wear a helmet? 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 89-317-P. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; #18Defense billboard (1988)#18. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Phone Record - October 26, 2010

EPA: Amy

Bunker RR Donnelly : Duane Okinaka

____________________________________________________________________ Mr. Okinaka spoke about challenges of printing color fuel econom y labels , including concerns about color fading and the ty pical number of large printer tray s .
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-4035

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARTURO ABURTO SANCHEZ, a/k/a Gustavo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:14-cr-00100-MR-DLH-1)

Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 16, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David G. Belser, BELSER & PARKE, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, United States Attorney, 

Anthony J. Enright, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Arturo Aburto Sanchez appeals his conviction for possession 

with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (2012). He argues that sentencing 

counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to object to 

one paragraph of the presentence report, ask for a variance, and 

present mitigating evidence that might have justified a variance. 

We affirm.

A prisoner “may raise a claim of ineffective assistance of 

counsel in the first instance on direct appeal if and only if it 

conclusively appears from the record that counsel did not provide 

effective assistance.” United States v. Galloway, 749 F.3d 238, 

241 (4th Cir. 2014) (alteration and ellipsis omitted). Absent 

such a showing, ineffective assistance claims should be raised in 

a motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012), in order to 

permit sufficient development of the record. United States v. 

Baptiste, 596 F.3d 214, 216 n.1 (4th Cir. 2010). Because the 

record here does not conclusively establish the alleged grounds 

for Sanchez’s claims, Sanchez does not meet this demanding 

standard. These claims should be raised, if at all, in a § 2255 

motion.

Accordingly, because Sanchez raises no claims that can be 

resolved in this appeal, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Before the Third Division,

January 19, 1942

No. 46849.

#### Petition 6148-R of Semon Bache & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the hearing a witness for the petitioners testified that prior to the filing of the entry in question reports from abroad as to the value of the merchandise were received by him and that he consulted with the examiner and disclosed all the information he had received. The examiner stated he had *447information that the dutiable value was higher than the invoice value of the goods. Therefore, the witness and the examiner selected an importation upon which an advance in value would be made for the purpose of a test case. The Customs Court held that the entered value was the proper dutiable value but this decision was reversed on appeal. Following *Mrs. G. P. Snow, Hearst Magazines, Inc.*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 46, C. D. 13), wherein a test case was made and the court held that the importers were not guilty of bad faith by that procedure, the petition in this case was granted.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)











My name is Rizalina Raneses and I am the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary Treasurer of Plandel Resources, Inc. (the “Company”).





I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Plandel Resources, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.





RIZALINA RANESES


Rizalina Raneses


Chief Financial Officer and


Secretary and Treasurer


Plandel Resources, Inc.





Date:October 3, 2012
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Oceanography from space: Satellite Sensors

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Oceanography from space: Satellite Sensors 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  161 × 91 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  018119834.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
December 28, 1940

No. 45083.

Suit 4215.

#### John *S. Connor*v *United States.*

Abstract 39995 affirmed. C. A. D. 143.
# C_2007183EN.01004001.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/40

---

Action brought on 15 June 2007 — Harman International Industries v OHIM — Becker (Barbara Becker)

(Case T-212/07)

(2007/C 183/76)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Harman International Industries, Inc. (Northridge, USA) (represented by: M. Vanhegan, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Barbara Becker (Miami, USA)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of paragraph 1 of the First Board of Appeal's decision of 7 March 2007 (Case R 502/2006-1), by which the decision of the Opposition Division of 15 February 2005 was annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of paragraph 1 of the First Board of Appeal's decision of 7 March 2007 (Case R 502/2006-1), by which the decision of the Opposition Division of 15 February 2005 was annulled;

| — | an order that the Community trade mark application No 2 939 072 be refused in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Community trade mark application No 2 939 072 be refused in its entirety;

| — | an order that the defendant pays the applicant its costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the defendant pays the applicant its costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: Barbara Becker

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The Community work mark ‘Barbara Becker’ for goods in Class 9 — application No 2 939 072

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Harman International Industries, Inc

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community word marks ‘BECKER’ and ‘BECKER ONLINE PRO’ for goods in Class 9

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal and rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Council Regulation 40/94 (‘CTMR’).

Pleas in law:

The applicant claims that the Board erred in its application of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR in finding that there was no conceptual similarity between the applicant's mark ‘BECKER’ and the sign applied for by ‘Barbara Becker’, and hence no likelihood of confusion. Furthermore, the applicant submits that the Board erred in law in its application of Article 8(5) CTMR in finding that there was no link between the sign applied for by ‘Barbara Becker’ and the Community trade mark of its own.

---
# C_2007269EN.01001502.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 September 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-381/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/14/EC - Informing and consulting employees - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2007/C 269/29)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Patakia and J. Enegren, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: N. Dafniou, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community — Joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on employee representation (OJ 2002 L 80, p. 29)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 28.10.2006.

1

---