### 47922 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 2015 / Notices

required to consider these late
comments.

The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the closing date and, as appropriate, will provide a ‘‘Response to Comments Memorandum’’ in the docket for each of the pesticides included in the table in Unit II. The interim registration review decision will explain the effect that any such comments had on the decision and provide the Agency’s response to significant comments, as needed.

Background on the registration review program is provided at: http:// www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation. Links to earlier documents related to the registration review of the pesticide cases identified in this notice are provided on the Pesticide Chemical Search data base accessible at: http://iaspub.epa.gov/ apex/pesticides/f?p=chemicalsearch.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. Dated: July 30, 2015. Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015–19590 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9932–09-Region 2]**

**Proposed Settlement Pursuant Section 122(h) of CERCLA Relating to the**  **Gowanus Canal Superfund Site, Brooklyn, Kings County, New York** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice; request for public
comment.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), Region 2, of a proposed settlement agreement pursuant to Section 122(h) of CERCLA, entered into by and EPA, Region 2, and Patterson Fuel Oil Co., Inc. (‘‘Settling Party’’), pertaining to the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) located in Brooklyn, Kings County, New York. Under the Settlement Agreement, the Settling Party agrees to pay EPA $100,000.00 for the recovery of response actions incurred at the Site.

The Settlement Agreement includes a covenant by EPA not to sue or to take administrative action against the Settling Party pursuant to Sections 106 and 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607(a), with regard to the Site, as defined in the Settlement Agreement. For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, EPA will receive written comments relating to the Settlement Agreement. EPA will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the Settlement Agreement if comments received disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the proposed Settlement Agreement is inappropriate, improper or inadequate. EPA’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at EPA Region 2 offices, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007–1866.

**DATES :**  Comments must be submitted on or before September 9, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  The proposed Settlement Agreement can be viewed at http:// www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/ gowanus/additionaldocs.html. It is also available for public inspection at EPA Region 2 offices at 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007–1866.

A copy may also be obtained from Brian Carr, Assistant Regional Counsel, New York/Caribbean Superfund Branch, Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA Region 2, 290 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10007–1866, 212– 637–3170, carr.brian@epa.gov. Comments should reference the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site, Brooklyn, New York. Index No. CERCLA–02–2015–2008 and should be sent by mail or email to Brian Carr, Assistant Regional Counsel, at the address or email address above.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Brian Carr, Assistant Regional Counsel, at the address, email or telephone number stated above.

Dated: July 27, 2015. Walter Mugdan, Director, Emergency and Remedial Response Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2015–19601 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–ORD–2015–0467; FRL–9932–08– ORD]** 

**Board of Scientific Counselors (BOSC) Safe and Sustainable Water Resources**  **Subcommittee Meeting—August 2015; Public Requests Correction** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice; correction. **SUMMARY :**  On July 30, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development (ORD), gave notice of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors (BOSC) Safe and Sustainable Water Resources Subcommittee in the Federal Register. On Page 45536, Column 3, in the **DATES** section, EPA inadvertently listed the date by which members of the public should request a draft agenda or request an opportunity to make oral presentations at the meeting as July 25, 2015. The correct date by which requests should be made is August 25, 2015.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  The Designated Federal Officer via mail at: Cindy Roberts, Mail Code 8104R, Office of Science Policy, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; via phone/voice mail at: (202) 564–1999; or via email at: roberts.cindy@epa.gov.

Dated: July 31, 2015. Fred S. Hauchman, Director, Office of Science Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–19592 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**Proposed Partial Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed partial consent decree; request for public
comment.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), notice is hereby given of a proposed partial consent decree to address a lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia: Sierra Club v. EPA , Civil Action No. 10– cv–1541 (CKK) (D.D.C.) (filed Sept. 14, 2010). Plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging that Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), failed to perform duties mandated by the CAA to: (1) Promulgate a federal implementation plan (‘‘FIP’’) for the State of Texas for the 1997 fine particulate matter (‘‘PM2.5 ’’) and ozone national ambient air quality standards (‘‘NAAQS’’); (2) promulgate a FIP for the State of Texas for the 1997 ozone NAAQS; and (3) take final approval/ disapproval action on the state implementation plan (‘‘SIP’’) that Texas submitted for implementation of the