alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007269EN.01001603.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Giessen lodged on 9 July 2007 — Markus Stoß v Wetteraukreis

(Case C-316/07)

(2007/C 269/32)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Giessen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Markus Stoß

Applicant:

Defendant: Wetteraukreis

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Articles 43 and 49 EC to be interpreted as precluding a national monopoly on certain gaming, such as sports betting, where there is no consistent and systematic policy to limit gaming in the Member State concerned as a whole, in particular because the operators which have been granted a licence within that Member State encourage participation in other gaming — such as State-run lotteries and casino games — and, moreover, other games with the same or a higher suspected potential danger of addiction — such as betting on certain sporting events (e.g. horse racing) and slot machines — may be provided by private service providers? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Articles 43 and 49 EC to be interpreted as precluding a national monopoly on certain gaming, such as sports betting, where there is no consistent and systematic policy to limit gaming in the Member State concerned as a whole, in particular because the operators which have been granted a licence within that Member State encourage participation in other gaming — such as State-run lotteries and casino games — and, moreover, other games with the same or a higher suspected potential danger of addiction — such as betting on certain sporting events (e.g. horse racing) and slot machines — may be provided by private service providers?

| 2. | Are Articles 43 and 49 EC to be interpreted as meaning that authorisations to operate sports betting, granted by State bodies specifically designated for that purpose by the Member States, which are not restricted to the particular national territory, entitle the holder of the authorisation and third parties appointed by it to make and implement offers to conclude contracts also in other Member States without any additional national authorisations being required? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are Articles 43 and 49 EC to be interpreted as meaning that authorisations to operate sports betting, granted by State bodies specifically designated for that purpose by the Member States, which are not restricted to the particular national territory, entitle the holder of the authorisation and third parties appointed by it to make and implement offers to conclude contracts also in other Member States without any additional national authorisations being required?

---
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Nia Daniels: 

I’m writing to you in regards to the missing information in my petition (Docket No. 

FAA-2014-0888) as described in your letter/email to me dated Monday February 2, 2015. 

The first item in question that requires more information is shown below with an 

appropriate response: 

It is important to note that in the Petition for Exemption, Number 5, Letter f., the 

following is stated: 

f.) A flight ceiling limit of 75’ altitude from the adjacent ground level or the height 

of foliage or trees adjacent to the property (lesser of the two) shall be strictly 

adhered to by the geo-fence and pilot-in-command for all inspections. This 

ensures that no contact with aircraft in the NAS will occur with our UAS because 

manned aircraft can not fly below the tree line or highest nearby obstacle. 

If a roof inspection is requested and/or required within 5 miles of an airport, B.E.V. will 

inform the airport operator and the airport air traffic control tower of the roof inspection 

prior to the inspection. This rule is currently in effect for model aircraft enthusiasts. 

Further, the strict geo-fence will keep the UAS below the tree or foliage line or 10’ above 

the structure that is to be inspected. This ensures that manned aircraft can not contact the 

UAS without striking trees or structures. In short, the UAS will never be flown in 

manned aircraft space. 

The second item in question that requires more information is shown below with an 

appropriate response: 

If any UAS discrepancies and/or incidents occur during a roof inspection, a written 

record of the incident shall be filed with the FAA and shall include any law enforcement 
contact information. The petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its 

UAS and ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS. 

Further, the petitioner has elected to maintain its UAS in accordance with the 

manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations prior to and after each flight. 

In the petition submitted originally, some of this information is listed in Number 5, Letter 

u., below: 

If these answers are not clear or specific in regards to the request for additional 

information, please respond and we will continue to help explain this petition. Thank you 

for your consideration. 

Kind Regards, 

Mike Johnson 

dba B.E.V. Roof Inspections 

248 Columbine Drive 

Carlisle, KY 40311 

Phone – 859-585-0531 

Fax – 859-651-0444 

email – mikejohnsonadjuster@gmail.com
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.2




                                  May 27, 1997




Mr. Robert M. Thornton, Jr.
1090 Northchase Parkway
Suite 200 South
Marietta, GA  30067-6402

Dear Mr. Thornton:

         KRUG International Corp. ("Corporation") hereby offers to amend
Section 2 of the Consulting and Employment Agreement dated May 17, 1996 between
you and the Corporation to increase your monthly salary to $13,500, effective
June 1, 1997.

         If this is agreeable to you, please sign the enclosed copy of this
letter and return it to me.


                                            Very truly yours,

                                            KRUG International Corp.


                                            By  /s/ James J. Mulligan
                                              -------------------------------
                                                        Secretary



Agreed:


/s/ Robert M. Thornton, Jr.
---------------------------------
Robert M. Thornton, Jr.
Before the First Division,

March 22, 1951

No. 55383.

#### M. Adler’s Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 135830-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *S. S. Kresge Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 89, C. D. 1269), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2007276EN.01000501.xml

| 17.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/5

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities

(2007/C 276/05)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a), second indent of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities (2) are amended as follows:

1

2

Page 58

In the paragraph ‘1102 20 10 and 1102 20 90’ the following text is inserted after the existing text:

1102 20 10 and 1102 20 90

‘These subheadings include also maize flour described as “masa flour”, which is obtained by the “nixtamalization” method that is characterised by the cooking and soaking of maize grains in a calcium hydroxide solution and subsequent drying and grinding.

Any additional processing, such as roasting, shall however lead to the exclusion of such a product from heading 1102 (generally, Chapter 19).’

In the paragraph ‘1103 13 10 and 1103 13 90’ the following text is inserted after the existing text:

1103 13 10 and 1103 13 90

‘These subheadings include also groats and meal of maize described as “masa flour”, which is obtained by the “nixtamalization” method that is characterised by the cooking and soaking of maize grains in a calcium hydroxide solution and subsequent drying and grinding.

Any additional processing, such as roasting, shall however lead to the exclusion of such a product from heading 1103 (generally, Chapter 19).’

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1, Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 733/2007 (OJ L 169, 29.6.2007, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 50, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

2

---
Copyright © 1997 Global Compliance, LLC. A LL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

## Basics Case No: 12-008-U - Flint Creek Retrofit Date Entered: 03/27/2012 09:30:33 AM Party/Requestor: Sierra Club, Jeff Speir Date Received: 03/26/2012 Date Requested: 03/26/2012 Internal Due Date: 04/03/2012 Service Due Date: 04/11/2012 Answer Status: New Service Date: 

## Question No: 1-040 The 2011 SCR unit cost of $181/kW is at the lower end of the range of unit costs reported for other similar installations. (See, e.g., J.E. Chichanowicz, Overview of Information on Projected Control Technology Costs and Performance as Developed for EPA’s Integrated Planning Model (IPM), October 15, 2010.) Please explain why the reported cost is lower than reported for other similar retrofits. Please document your answer. Answer: The Company is not familiar with the "J.E. Chichanowicz, Overview of Information on Projected Control Technology Costs and Performance as Developed for EPA’s Integrated Planning Model (IPM), October 15, 2010", and cannot reconcile the Company's estimate to numbers provided in the report. However, the estimated as-built cost for the Flint Creek SCR is $230/kW. The $181/kW represents the $230/kW discounted to 2011 dollars. Please refer to APSC Staff DR 1-3, file "Table 6 (SCW Dir) WP (Cost of Alternative).xls" in this proceeding for the associated calculations. Advanced Date Verified: Date Accepted: Confidential: No Yes Attachments:

Voluminous: No Yes Highly Sensitive: No Yes
Comments:

Preparer(s): Kevin J Munson; Michael L Wilkinson; Twana Banks-Smith; William E Mast Witness: Christian T Beam

Modification History Created by Twana Banks-Smith Created on 04/19/2012 12:10:37 PM Modified on 04/19/2012 01:35:24 PMCopyright © 1997 Global Compliance, LLC. A LL RIGHTS RESERVED. Edit History 1. Twana Banks-Smith 04/19/2012 01:35:16 PM 0. Twana Banks-Smith 04/19/2012 12:37:04 PM
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29716]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

Closing Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock to Navigation, Located in 
Minneapolis, MN

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Section 2010 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
of 2014 (WRRDA) directed the Secretary of the Army to close the Upper 
St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam located on the Mississippi River at 
river mile 853.9 no later than 1 year after the enactment date of WRRDA 
2014. The provision specifically allows the U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers to continue to carry out emergency lock operations necessary 
to mitigate flood damage. The WRRDA was enacted on June 10, 2014. To 
comply with WRRDA, the Corps will close Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock to 
navigation by June 10, 2015. The final closure date will be determined, 
within the statutory deadline, after the environmental analysis 
required by the National Environmental Policy Act is complete.

DATES: The Draft Environmental Assessment for this lock closure action 
will be available for public comment through January 23, 2015. The 
public notice and a link to the Environmental Assessment can be found 
at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Home/PublicNotices.aspx.

ADDRESSES: Questions concerning the Draft Environmental Assessment can 
be addressed to Mr. Elliott Stefanik, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 180 
Fifth Street East, Suite 700, St. Paul, MN 55101-1678, or by email at 
elliott.l.stefanik@usace.army.mil.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey McKee at Corps of 
Engineers Headquarters in Washington, DC, by phone at 202-761-8648.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The legal authority for the regulation 
governing the use, administration, and navigation of the Upper St. 
Anthony Falls lock is Section 4 of the River and Harbor Act of August 
18, 1894 (28 Stat. 362), as amended, which is codified at 33 U.S.C. 
Section 1. This statute requires the Secretary of the Army to 
``prescribe such regulations for the use, administration, and 
navigation of the navigable waters of the United States'' as the 
Secretary determines may be required by public necessity. Reference 33 
CFR 207.300, Mississippi River above Cairo, Ill., and their 
tributaries; use, administration, and navigation.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-29716 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:11-cr-128-9

Benjamin F. Henson 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 273) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: September 20, 2011 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cr-00128-JLG-TPK Doc #: 313 Filed: 09/20/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 32.2

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Each of the undersigned officers of Tampa Electric Company (the Company) certifies, under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                        
|------ |  | ---------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: |  | October 30, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ S. W. HUDSON                                                       
|       |  |                  |  |  |  |  |  | S. W. HUDSON                                                           
|       |  |                  |  |  |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board, Director andChief Executive Officer             
|       |  |                  |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                          
|       |  |                  |  | 
|Dated: |  | October 30, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ S. W. CALLAHAN                                                     
|       |  |                  |  |  |  |  |  | S. W. CALLAHAN                                                         
|       |  |                  |  |  |  |  |  | Vice President-Finance and Accountingand Chief Financial Officer       
|       |  |                  |  |  |  |  |  | (Chief Accounting Officer) (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), pursuant to the Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106-50), Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs will host a public meeting on Friday, January 26, 2007, starting at 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. EST. The meeting will take place at SBA, 409 3rd Street, SW., Eisenhower Conference Room, Side B, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20416. 

The purpose of the meeting is to select the Committee's Chairman and Vice-Chairman and outline the agenda for 2007. 

                    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Cheryl Clark, Program Liaison, Office of Veterans Business Development at (202) 205-6773, or send e-mail to                     *cheryl.clark@sba.gov.*

Matthew Teague, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-613 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32

Securities
and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of TEL Offshore Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, N.A.,
Corporate Trustee for TEL Offshore TrustDate: May 14, 2015

By:

/s/ MICHAEL J. ULRICH Michael J. Ulrich Vice President


---



QuickLinks
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Bicentennial 1789-1989: America's star

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Bicentennial 1789-1989: America's star 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Labor. Wage and Hour Division 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Rev. Oct. 1996. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  WH publication ; 1088 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  143 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  036081675.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 51124.

#### Petition 6507-R of North American Mercantile Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In order to establish a test case, the goods in question were entered at prices representing 'export value, with knowledge that appraisement would be made upon the basis of American selling price as defined in section 402 (g). Upon the record it was held that there was no intent to defraud the Government or to deceive its officials. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 40289.

#### Protests 958919-G, etc., of Austin Nichols & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by First Division. — Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 47499.

#### Protest 79593-K of Iwata Trading Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial counsel stipulated that the merchandise invoiced as “wooden puzzles” is in chief value of wood and not chiefly used for the amusement of children. The claim at 33)4 percent under paragraph 412 was therefore sustained.