alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Gobiern o d e Puert o Rico Municipi o Autonom o d e Ponc e

CIUDA D SENORIA L Ho n M3r!': i 'Mdyita ' hlew* ; AJler i 

### Dc5T^OST - TO^- (^g^^ L Februar y 14,201 1

U S DEPARTMENT O F TRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O F TH

E SECRETARY 120 0 NE W JERSE Y AVENUE , S E WASHINGTON , D C 2059 0 Dea r Mr . Homan : B y emai l to : kevin.adamsfBdot.Ko v C D O C D ^

RE : EA S Reques t

fo r Proposal a

t Mayaguez , Expiratio n a

t Ponc e Thi s i s i n referenc e t o th e determinatio n fo r no t orde r requestin g proposal s a

t Ponce , t o provide dEssential Ai r Servic e (EAS) . Th e Ponc e Communit

y need s an di s entitle dt o reliabl e uninterrupte dai r service . Th e servic e currentl y provide d b y Je t Blu e doe s no t

serv e asteady populatio n o f user s betwee n Sa

n Juan an dth e Virgi n Island . Cap e Air offers flight s an dconnection s tha

t Je t Blu e doe s not . Additional , wit h th e departure o f

Cap e Air , there wil l no t

b e an y flight s to Sa

n Juan . I n cas e o f a n emergenc y i

n Route 52 , th e populatio n wil l no t hav e afas t

an dsecure route fo

r arrivin g i n Sa

n Juan . Th e Sout

h Regio n o f

Puert o Ric o compose dfo r 1 5 municipalitie s wit

h 604,19 5 habitant s i n th e total of

th e region . Cap e Air provide da

n invaluabl e servic e to peopl e employe di n th e Virgi n Islan dwh o us e Ponc e a s th e major airport . Considerin g th e negativ e impac t that , Cap e Air

departur e wil l hav e a

t thi s tim e i

n th e overal l economi c strategi c development

i n ou r region . Please , revie w your determination , w e believ e tha t i t i s extremel y important fo r th e futur e economi c an

dsocial developmen t

o f Ponc e tha

t Cap e Air continue doffering th e EA S i n th e city . I f yo u hav e an y questio n about

thi s letter , pleas e contac t th e Autonomou s Municipality o f Ponc e fo r additional informatio n a

t (787 ) 284-414 1 extensio n 222 9 or 2183 . Cordially ,

M^RI A E . MEL ' MAYO R MD ^ ^

^^?^&*^u i a » tS<&vi:3Sn' ^ iy ^ P O BO X 33170 9 Ponce , Puert o Ric o 00733-170 9 Tel6fon o (787)284414 1 * www.visitponce.co m
A90A0008.

#### KERSEY v. C.S.R.A. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AUTHORITY, INC.

(392 SE2d 305)

Banke, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment to the defendant in a slip-and-fall action.

The defendant is a non-profit corporation which distributes surplus food commodities to the elderly in Emanuel County, using the 4-H Club building as a distribution center. To facilitate the distribution process, the program participants queue up at the entrance ramp to the building, obtain the food commodities inside the facility, and exit through the rear door. Directly outside the rear door is a concrete stairway consisting of five steps, equipped with a handrail on either side. The plaintiff slipped and fell as she was descending this stairway while holding two bags of food given to her by the defendant. She acknowledged that she had exited the building using that particular stairway on at least one prior occasion, and she does not allege that there was any defect in the design or structure of the stairway itself. However, she contends that the defendant negligently exposed her to danger by sending her down this stairway while she was carrying, in her words, a “heavy load.” *Held:*

Landowners or occupiers of land are not insurers of the safety of their invitees. *Watson v. C & S Bank,*103 Ga. App. 535, 536 (120 SE2d 62) (1961). “ ‘Falling and injuring one’s self proves nothing. Such happenings are commonplace wherever humans go.’ [Cit.] In order for a plaintiff to recover, two elements must be proven: ‘(1) Fault on the part of the owner, and (2) ignorance of the danger on the part of the invitee. The basis of the proprietor’s liability is his superior knowledge, and if his invitee knows of the condition or hazard there is no duty on the part of the proprietor to warn (the invitee) and there is no liability for resulting injury because the invitee has as much knowledge as the proprietor does and then by voluntarily acting in view of (this) knowledge, assumes the risks and dangers incident to *95the known condition.’ [Cit.] ‘As was observed in *Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp.,*110 Ga. App. 170 (138 SE2d 77) [1964], there should be no duty to warn of the perfectly obvious such as posting a sign on a stairwell that “These are steps. . . .” [Cit.]’ ” *Gyles, Inc. v. Turner,*184 Ga. App. 376, 377 (361 SE2d 538) (1987). Moreover, “[t]he fact that [the plaintiff] had a package in her hands when she departed is not material.” *Garnett v. Mathison,*179 Ga. App. 242, 243 (345 SE2d 919) (1986).

Decided March 12, 1990

Rehearing denied March 26, 1990.

*Cheney & Cheney, Curtis V. Cheney, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Dye, Miller, Tucker & Everitt, Mark W. Wortham, A. Rowland Dye,*for appellee.

Because there is no contention in the present case that the steps were defective and because the plaintiff clearly was as aware as the defendant of the alleged hazard which caused her to fall, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Birdsong and Cooper, JJ., concur.*
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 521-2336, the US Postal Service information hotline

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Got a question? try this line get your free directory here, then call 521-2336, the US Postal Service information hotline 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Postal Service 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States Postal Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  191 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019289471.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2007183EN.01002702.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/27

---

Action brought on 18 June 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-293/07)

(2007/C 183/47)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and D. Recchia)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that, by failing to take all the measures necessary to establish and apply a coherent, specific and integrated legal regime capable of ensuring viable management and effective protection of areas designated as Special Protection Areas, in the light of the conservation objectives of Council Directive 79/409/EEC (1) of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) and (2), in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 4(4) of that directive, as amended by Article 6(2) to (4) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to take all the measures necessary to establish and apply a coherent, specific and integrated legal regime capable of ensuring viable management and effective protection of areas designated as Special Protection Areas, in the light of the conservation objectives of Council Directive 79/409/EEC (1) of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) and (2), in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 4(4) of that directive, as amended by Article 6(2) to (4) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

On the basis of a large number of complaints, Parliamentary questions and petitions, the Commission maintains that the Hellenic Republic is not properly applying the provisions of Directive 79/409/EEC which requires measures to be taken for the conservation of wild bird habitats and for the avoidance of their pollution and deterioration.

In the Commission's view, the infringement of the directive consists in the lack of protection for Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and also the existence of activities which may damage their integrity and have significant negative consequences for the objectives of conservation of SPAs and of the species for which the areas have been defined.

The argument of the Greek authorities that the existing legislative framework ensures to a satisfactory degree the protection of all types of wild birds and their respective habitats is countered by the Commission with the argument that that framework does not constitute a specific and effective protection framework for all SPAs.

---

(1)  OJ L 103 of 25.4.1979, p. 1.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:11-cv-274

v. JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp

FALL OAKS FARM LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the February 26, 2015 motion to

vacate the judgment filed by Defendant James Moder. (ECF No. 160.) If this filing is a motion

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, Moder’s prior notice of appeal divests this Court of

the requisite jurisdiction to grant the motion. Moreover, even if the Court has jurisdiction, the

Court would deny the motion on the merits. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:11-cv-00274-GLF-TPK Doc #: 161 Filed: 03/02/15 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Navy Medical Department guiding principles

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Navy Medical Department guiding principles 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  The Department? 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 89-786-P.A brief statement of the Navy Medical Department's mission and goals. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Navy. Medical Department 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 31 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
SWINGPLANE VENTURES, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), Ismael Gonzalez Balboa, Chief Executive Officer and President of Swingplane Ventures, Inc. (the "Company"), and Dimitrios Trikeriotis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.
The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2014 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report.





DATE: October 14, 2014
By:
/s/Ismael Gonzalez BalboaName:
Ismael Gonzalez BalboaTitle:
Chief Executive Officer & President(Principal Executive Officer)




DATE: October 14, 2014
By:
/s/Dimitrios TrikeriotisName:
Dimitrios TrikeriotisTitle:
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
# C_2007183EN.01002701.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/27

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsrätten (Sweden) lodged on 15 June 2007 — Kollektivavtalsstiftelsen TRR Trygghetsrådet v Skatteverket

(Case C-291/07)

(2007/C 183/46)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Regeringsrätten

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kollektivavtalsstiftelsen TRR Trygghetsrådet

Applicant:

Defendant: Skatteverket

Defendant:

Question referred

Are Articles 9(2)(e) and 21(1)(b) of the Sixth VAT Directive (1) and Articles 56(1)(c) and 196 of the Council Directive on a common system of value added tax (2) to be interpreted as meaning that a person who purchases consultancy services from a person liable to tax in another EC country and carries out both economic activity and also activity which falls outside the scope of the Directives is to be regarded as a taxable person/person liable to tax where those articles are applied, even though the purchase was made solely in respect of the latter activity?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.4




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


UCDP FINANCE, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 27, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tracey L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: October 20, 2009





By:

/s/ Tracey L. StockwellTracey L. Stockwell
Principal Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 11/21/14

FROM: Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at the Air and Waste Management Association 

Southern Section 2014 Annual Meeting and Technical Conference

SUMMARY: 

Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to participants at the Air and Waste 

Management Association Southern Section 2014 Annual Meeting and Technical Conference

on September 11, 2014, in Montgomery, Alabama. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants 

was proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Carol Kemker/EPA R4

External Stakeholders

See attached list

ATTACHMENTs
Edward /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 4, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00483

- CV

Rowland MARTIN , Jr., Appellant

v.

Edward BRAVENEC , and The Law Office of Mcknight and Bravenec, Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar Co unty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 07644 Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to Challenge Order Sustaining Indigency Contest is GRANTED. Appellant’s third supplemental notice of appeal which this court has construed as a motion for review pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(j)(1) is DENIED. Appellant’s Motion for Preparation of Record Excerpts with Requests for Special Accommodations Pursuant

to Rule of Judicial Administration 16.1 is DENIED.

It is ORDERED that appellant file written proof with this court no later than fifteen days from the date of this order that he has paid or made arrangements to pay the fees for the preparation of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record for th is appeal. If appellant fails to file written proof within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chie f Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hott le

Clerk of Court
# C_2007155EN.01000802.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/8

---

Action brought on 26 March 2007 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union

(Case C-166/07)

(2007/C 155/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: I. Klavina and L. Visaggio, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and M. Moore, Agents)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1968/2006 (1) of 21 December 2006 concerning Community financial contributions to the International Fund for Ireland (2007 to 2010); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1968/2006 (1) of 21 December 2006 concerning Community financial contributions to the International Fund for Ireland (2007 to 2010);

1

| — | The Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The European Parliament relies on one plea in law in support of its action, alleging the incorrect choice of legal basis for the contested Regulation. Since the measures provided for by that regulation concern Community allocations in respect of economic and social cohesion, they should have been adopted on the basis of the third paragraph of Article 159 EC and not on that of Article 308 EC, which can be used only if no other provision of the Treaty confers on the Community institutions the necessary power to adopt the act in question.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 409, p. 86 and corrigendum — OJ 2007 L 36, p. 31.

1

---