alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Paul E. Martin, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corp.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  [Reserved];  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and theaudit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 11, 2005     /s/ Paul E. Martin   Paul E. Martin   Interim Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

SCOTT EHLERS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs. Civil Action 2:10-CV-1147

Judge Watson

Magistrate Judge King

RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC., et al.,

Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________

SUSAN GIORDANO,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-CV-614

Judge Watson

Magistrate Judge King

RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC.

Defendant.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (Doc. No. 46), the motions

to certify (Doc. No. 25 in 2:10-cv-1147; Doc. No. 26 in 2:11-cv-614)

are WITHDRAWN on the terms reflected in the stipulation.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove the motions to certify from the

Court’s pending motions list.

September 21, 2012 s/Norah McCann King 

 Norah McCann King

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:10-cv-01147-MHW-NMK Doc #: 47 Filed: 09/21/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 35.1

Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon,
as Trustee.

I, James W. P. Hall, Vice President of The Bank of New
York Mellon, a New York corporation (the “Trustee”), states:

(a) A review of the Trustee’s activities for the period
from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Trustee’s performance under
the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated July 15, 2010 between MS Structured Asset Corp. as depositor (the “Depositor”)
and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary, in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor and
the Trustee (as amended in each such case, the “Trust Agreement”), has been made under my supervision.

(b) To the best of my knowledge and based on such review,
the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period
for CMT Linked Trust Units Series 2010-01.

The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee



|Date: March 5, 2018 |  | By: /s/  James W. Hall
|------------------- |  | ----------------------
|                    |  | Name:  James W. Hall  
|                    |  | Title: Vice President
No. 53134.

#### P. C. Kuyper & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 541097-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protests were dismissed.
# C_2007233EN.01000402.xml

| 5.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4852 — Groupe Arnault/CNP/Go Voyages)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 233/04)

On 4 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4852. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4852. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009,      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ended September 30, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of 355,  Inc. |

| Date:      October 23, 2009                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                        |
| 355,      Inc.                                                              |
|                                                                        |
| By:      /s/ Alex Jen          |
| Alex      JenChief      Executive OfficerChief      Financial Officer       |
Transport containers 

containing EMULGEN B-66

18 kg Can(EMULGEN B-66)

Deionized water

Blending tank

a measuring

Worker exposure :

Schematic Diagram of Typical treatment (colorant production processes)

1. No human exposure to substance contained in EMULGEN B-66 by inhalation is expected during colorant 

production processes because the substance have low volatility and stable under normal conditions and all the 

processes are equipped with duct. (steps a-c) 

2. No human exposure to substance contained in EMULGEN B-66 by direct contact is expected during measuring 

process because the workers involved in setting up the unloading operation would be expected to use splash 

goggles and appropriate gloves. (step a) 

3. No human exposure to substance contained in EMULGEN B-66 by direct contact is expected during production 

and disposal processes because the processes are automated and no manual work is required. (steps b, c)

Environmental release :

1. Release of substance contained in EMULGEN B-66 to the environment is not expected during colorant production 

processes because all materials adhered to cloths and containers will be disposed by incineration 

(steps a-c) 

2. Release of substance contained in EMULGEN B-66 to sewage is not expected during disposal process because 

blending tank is washed with water and is treated with wastewater treatment equipment by sludge treatment or 

adsorption treatment (step b)

Dye, other materials

50 kg/day 2000 kg/day 500 kg/day

Blending

Filtration

Packing

Colorant

(Product)

Washing

(with 2000 kg water)

Wastewater 

Treatment

5 kg/day

2005 kg/day

(EMULGEN B-66 : 50ppm)

EMULGEN B-66 contains 

Polyoxyethylene(14) tribenzylated phenyl ether

b production

c disposal

Equipped with duct
Order entered February 1 2 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 01409

- CV

LEATHA A. MUNAI, Appellant

V.

WILLIAM K. MUNAI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 04

- 04859



### O RDER

We GRANT appellees’ February 7, 2014 unopposed motion to extend time to file brief

and ORDER the brief be filed no later than March 8, 2014.

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
(Reap. Dec. 9319)

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 875894, etc.

(Decided February 24, 1959)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals enumerated in the attached schedule A are for reappraisement of the values of various kinds of merchandise imported from Japan.

The appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation of counsel limiting them to the merchandise shipped by Nanri Trading Co., Ltd., and abandoning the same as to all other merchandise. The said stipulation also recites certain agreed facts, *495on the basis of which I find, as to the merchandise shipped by Nanri Trading Co., Ltd., that export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for determining the value of the said merchandise, and that such value, as to each item, was the net invoice price, packing included. In all other respects and as to all other merchandise, the appeals for reappraisement, having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #10838 and #10839]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of MINNESOTA dated 04/02/2007. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         03/14/2007.
 EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/02/2007. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/01/2007. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/02/2008.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to : U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,  U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Traverse *Contiguous Counties:*
                     Minnesota Big Stone, Grant, Stevens Wilkin North Dakota Richland South Dakota Roberts *The Interest Rates are:* PercentHomeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.750Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10838 6 and for economic injury is 10839 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are: Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: April 2, 2007. Steven C. Preston, Administrator.


[FR Doc. E7-6634 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2007140EN.01001901.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/19

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 May 2007 — Freistaat Sachsen v Commission

(Case T-357/02) (1)

1

(State aid - Aid granted by the authorities of the Free State of Saxony - Aid scheme for small and medium-sized enterprises - Accelerated clearance procedure - Application ratione temporis of the Community guidelines and of the exempting regulation concerning aid to small and medium-sized enterprises - Aid scheme notified before the entry into force of the exempting regulation - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Complete notification)

(2007/C 140/29)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Freistaat Sachsen (Germany) (represented by: T. Lübbig, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Kreuschitz and J. Flett, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of the second paragraph of Article 2 and of Articles 3 and 4 of Commission Decision 2003/226/EC of 24 September 2002 on an aid scheme which the Federal Republic of Germany is planning to implement — ‘Guidelines on assistance for SMEs — Improving business efficiency in Saxony’: Subprogrammes 1 (Coaching), 4 (Participation in fairs), 5 (Cooperation) and 7 (Design promotion) (OJ 2003 L 91, p. 13),

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the second paragraph of Article 2 and Articles 3 and 4 of Commission Decision 2003/226/EC of 24 September 2002 on an aid scheme which the Federal Republic of Germany is planning to implement — ‘Guidelines on assistance for SMEs — Improving business efficiency in Saxony’: Subprogrammes 1 (Coaching), 4 (Participation in fairs), 5 (Cooperation) and 7 (Design promotion); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the second paragraph of Article 2 and Articles 3 and 4 of Commission Decision 2003/226/EC of 24 September 2002 on an aid scheme which the Federal Republic of Germany is planning to implement — ‘Guidelines on assistance for SMEs — Improving business efficiency in Saxony’: Subprogrammes 1 (Coaching), 4 (Participation in fairs), 5 (Cooperation) and 7 (Design promotion);

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 8.2.2003.

1

---
----

***FLINT      RIVER BANCSHARES, INC.***

***Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350***

***For      the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005***

**Exhibit      32.1**

----

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  Gerald E. Lewis     |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Gerald                  E. Lewis         |   |
| Chief                  Executive Officer |   |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

SHERON PHIPPS,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

Case No. 2:11-cr-00080

Judge Peter C. Economus

Magistrate Judge Terrence P. Kemp

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of 

the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 64.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that this action be 

transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

On October 6, 2014, Petitioner Sheron Phipps filed the instant motion to vacate, set aside, 

or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He challenges his February 6, 2012, judgment 

of conviction on a charge of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, made pursuant to the 

terms of his negotiated guilty plea. (ECF No. 16 at 41.) He asserts that he was denied effective 

assistance of counsel. (Motion to Vacate, ECF No. 63.) On March 3, 2014, however, Petitioner 

filed a prior § 2255 motion challenging this same conviction. (Motion to Vacate, ECF No. 53.) 

On April 2, 2014, this Court denied Petitioner’s prior motion to vacate, set aside or correct 

sentence. (Order, ECF No. 57.) This action therefore constitutes a successive petition (i.e. a 

second petition directed to the same conviction as a prior petition). The Magistrate Judge found 

that unless the court of appeals has given approval for the filing of a second or successive 

petition, a district court in the Sixth Circuit must transfer the petition to the Sixth Circuit Court of 

Appeals. In re Sims, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir. 1997) (per curia).

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties 

that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a 

Case: 2:11-cr-00080-PCE-TPK Doc #: 66 Filed: 11/25/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2

“waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the 

judgment of the District Court.” (Report & Recommendation, ECF No. 64 at 3.) The time period 

for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. No party has objected to the 

Report and Recommendation. 

The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such 

objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge. This action shall be TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth 

Circuit for authorization for filing as successive. 

The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove this action from the Court’s pending case list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case: 2:11-cr-00080-PCE-TPK Doc #: 66 Filed: 11/25/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MARY JANE WEST,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-CV-448

Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge King 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

ORDER

On August 2, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended

that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be affirmed and

that this action be dismissed. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 17. 

Although the parties were advised of their right to object to the

recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so, there

has nevertheless been no objection.

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 17, is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. 

The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. This

action is hereby DISMISSED.

The Clerk shall enter FINAL JUDGMENT pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42

U.S.C. § 405(g).

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00448-ALM-NMK Doc #: 18 Filed: 08/28/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>