alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YAFFET MATINDAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73116

Agency No. A078-020-315

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 19, 2010** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Yaffet Matindas, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

JUL 30 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence. Wakkary

v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and grant in part

the petition for review, and we remand.

The record does not compel the conclusion that changed or extraordinary

circumstances excused Matindas’ untimely filed asylum application. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.4(a)(4), (5); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 656-58 (9th Cir. 2007)

(per curiam). Accordingly, Matindas’ asylum claim fails.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because

Matindas failed to establish it is more likely than not that he will be tortured upon

return to Indonesia. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1067-68.

Matindas suffered death threats, the destruction of two businesses, two

attacks where his car was stopped and stolen, and a forced relocation, all on

account of his Christian religion. Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s

determination that these incidents did not rise to the level of persecution. See

Baballah v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1067, 1076 (9th Cir.2004) (cumulative effects of

attacks and economic harassment compelled finding of persecution). In addition,

in denying Matindas’ withholding of removal claim, the BIA did not apply the

disfavored group analysis set forth in Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th

Cir. 2004). Intervening case law holds the disfavored group analysis applies to
3

Matindas withholding of removal claim. See Wakkary, 558 F. 3d at 1062-65: see

also Tampubolon v. Holder, 2010 WL 2451610 at *5 (9th Cir. June 25, 2010) 

(“[A]ny reasonable factfinder would be compelled to conclude on this record that

Christian Indonesians are a disfavored group.”). Accordingly, we grant the

petition for review with respect to Matindas’ withholding of removal claim and

remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v.

Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6036]



[[Page 15698]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Evaluation of the Immune Response to a Modified 
Dosing Schedule of the Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine, Potential Extramural 
Project (PEP) 2007-R-03

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-4 p.m., May 17, 2007 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of ``The Immune Response to a Modified 
Dosing Schedule of the Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine,'' PEP 2007-R-03.
    Contact Person for More Information: Christine J. Morrison, PhD, 
Scientific Review Administrator, Office of the Chief Science 
Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop D-72, Atlanta, GA 
30333, Telephone (404) 639-3098.

    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 26, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E7-6036 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# C_2007207EN.01000201.xml

| 6.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 September 2007

(2007/C 207/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3588 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4489 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,676 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3948 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6462 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,87 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9105 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,64 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6987 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8225 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3248 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,781 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7717 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6553 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4329 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5897 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9643 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0752 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 274,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8628 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2585 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3216 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 770,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,768 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,381 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,909 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,222 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3588

JPY

Japanese yen

157,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4489

GBP

Pound sterling

0,676

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3948

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6462

ISK

Iceland króna

87,87

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9105

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,64

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6987

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8225

RON

Romanian leu

3,3248

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,781

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7717

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6553

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4329

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5897

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9643

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0752

KRW

South Korean won

1 274,62

ZAR

South African rand

9,8628

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2585

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3216

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 770,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,768

PHP

Philippine peso

63,381

RUB

Russian rouble

34,909

THB

Thai baht

44,222

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EX-32.1

** Certificationof Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to**

**18U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golden Fork Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal yearended May 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alida Heyer, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

*(1)*      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

*(2)*      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of thedates presented and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented

 

Date: August16, 2011

 

By: 	*“Alida Heyer”*

*Alida Heyer*

President, Treasurer and Secretaryand Sole Director
Exhibit 99.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Nova
Scotia Power Incorporated (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,

I, Robert R. Bennett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  |                                                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Robert R. Bennett
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | Robert R. Bennett President
and Chief Executive Officer
A90A0174.

#### HOLLINGSWORTH v. THE STATE.

(394 SE2d 131)

Decided May 2, 1990.

*David E. Morgan III,*for appellant.

*John C. Pridgen, District Attorney, James E. Turk, Assistant*
      *503
      *District Attorney,*for appellee.

*502Cooper, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of trafficking in cocaine, possession of marijuana and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The trial court denied his motion for new trial and this appeal followed.

The record reveals that appellant was stopped and issued a speeding citation by a Crisp County sheriffs deputy for driving 80 mph in a 65 mph zone on Interstate 75. The deputy testified that appellant appeared nervous so he requested permission to search the car, explaining that appellant could withdraw his consent and stop the search at any time. Appellant consented and the deputy found a loaded 9 mm pistol and a pair of handcuffs inside the car. The deputy handed appellant the car keys and asked that appellant open the trunk for further search. Appellant did not object. The trunk contained another pistol, two loaded clips, boxes of ammunition and two plastic bags of cocaine. Appellant was placed under arrest and patted down by a second officer who found marijuana in appellant’s coat pocket. The State also introduced evidence of two prior South Carolina convictions of appellant for trafficking in cocaine and distribution of cocaine.

1. Appellant enumerates the general grounds. The evidence construed most strongly in favor of the guilty verdict was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find proof of appellant’s guilt of violating OCGA §§ 16-13-31 (a); 16-13-30 and 16-11-106, beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); *Hunter v. State,*190 Ga. App. 52 (378 SE2d 338) (1989).

2. Appellant’s remaining enumerations of error are deemed abandoned because they are not supported by argument or citation of authority pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 15 (c) (2). *Pupo v. State,*187 Ga. App. 765 (7) (371 SE2d 219) (1988).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Banke, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.*
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Black health awareness: past and present: Cancer

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Black health awareness: past and present: Cancer 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Cancer 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.) 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Notable American, historical information, Ms. Sarah Vaughan, 1924-1990. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  Vaughan, Sarah, 1924-1990Centers for Disease Control (U.S.) 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  128 × 36 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  035693191.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Le Gaga Holdings Limited: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-173979) on Form S-8 of Le Gaga Holdings Limited of our report datedNovember 23, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Le Gaga Holdings Limited and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated income statements, statements of comprehensiveincome, statements of changes in equity and statements of cash flows for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2012, which report appears in the June 30, 2012 transition report onForm 20-F of Le Gaga Holdings Limited. 

/s/ KPMG 

Hong Kong, China 

November 23, 2012
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00114

- CR

L

AURA M C C REARY

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Ap peal from County Criminal

Court No. 5

of Denton County ( CR

- 2019

- 02989 -E)

July 21, 2022

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgme nt. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
A90A0138.

#### KENNY v. THE STATE.

(392 SE2d 344)

Sognier, Judge.

Johnny Kenny was convicted of simple battery and he appeals.

Appellant contends in his sole enumeration of error that the trial court erred by charging the jury that “the defendant’s flight from the scene of the offense is circumstantial evidence of his guilt and of his knowledge of his guilt, and you may but are not required to make an inference from flight, if flight be proven to you. It is a settled rule of evidence in this State that evidence of flight may be submitted to the jury and that they may infer guilt therefrom.” Pretermitting the issue whether statements by appellant’s counsel during the charge conference constituted an endorsement of the exact language charged by the trial court, see *Edwards v. State,*235 Ga. 603, 604 (2) (221 SE2d 28) (1975), we do not agree with appellant that the syntax used in the charge resulted in an unauthorized comment on the evidence by the *23trial court. Specifically, appellant argues that the failure to charge the second sentence first and to place the “if flight be proven to you” clause at the beginning of its sentence resulted in a charge which improperly instructed the jury that appellant did flee from the scene of the offense and was evidence of his guilt.

Decided March 16, 1990.

*John D. McCord III,*for appellant.

*Ralph T. Bowden, Jr., Solicitor, Richard Read, N. Jackson Cotney, Jr., Assistant Solicitors,*for appellee.

The jury was thoroughly charged on circumstantial evidence and was instructed that no comment made by the trial court was “intended to express any opinion about the facts of this case, . . . upon the evidence or upon the guilt or innocence of the defendant.” “It is not necessary in considering a charge to assume a possible adverse construction, but a charge that is sufficiently clear to be understood by jurors of ordinary understanding is all that is required. [Cit.]” *Clark v. State,*153 Ga. App. 829, 831 (2) (266 SE2d 577) (1980). While we do not endorse the unnecessarily convoluted language employed in the charge of which complaint is made, when put together and considered in context with the charge as a whole, we find no harmful error in the charge. Id.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.*
MEMORANDUM

To: United States Department of Ener gy

From: Erica Logan, Information Technology Industry Council

Date: 24 March 2014

Re: Ex Parte Communication

On Thursday March 20 th , energy efficiency experts held a teleconference call with representatives of the US Department of Energy (DOE) to discuss DOE’s proposed determination for “computer systems”. The industry representatives requested clarification regarding DOE’s intent with respect to how “computer systems” are defined, and shared pertinent technical and business information.

The following individuals attended either part or the entire teleconference call meeting:

Jeremy Dommu, DOE Dan Cohen, DOE Celia Sher, DOE Erica Logan, ITI Chris Hankin, ITI
Robert White, Dell Gary Verdun, Dell
Mark Hollenbeck, HP Adrian Liga, Apple Jay Taylor, Schneider Electric Donna Sadowy, AMD David Maciel, Sony Jenni Chun, Samsung Deb Lord, Oracle Shahid Sheikh, Intel

Sincerely,

Erica Logan Information Technology Industry Council
1

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

No. 94-30411.

In the Matter of Lawrence W. STOULIG, Jr. and Adine Gray Stoulig,

Debtors.

Lawrence W. STOULIG, Jr., and Adine Gray Stoulig, Appellees,

v.

Cynthia Lee TRAINA, Appellant.

Feb. 27, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Louisiana.

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, GARWOOD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this case the debtors filed under Chapter 7 of the

Bankruptcy Code on December 3, 1993, claiming certain of their

properties to be exempt from distribution to creditors. 11 U.S.C.

§ 522(l ). An interim trustee was appointed December 9, 1993. On

January 13, 1994, the meeting of creditors under section 341 of the

Bankruptcy Code was held, and at the meeting the debtors furnished

the trustee with all requested information concerning the debtors'

claimed exemptions. Two days before the expiration of the

thirty-day period provided for in Bankruptcy Rule 4003(b), the

trustee moved for an extension of the deadline for filing

objections to the claimed exemptions. On April 8, 1994, the

bankruptcy court granted the trustee's motion to extend the

deadline for filing objections to exemptions. The debtors

appealed, and the district court reversed, holding that under rule
2

4003(b) the bankruptcy court was without jurisdiction to grant an

extension of time to file objections to exemptions after the

expiration of the thirty-day period prescribed by rule 4003(b).

Lawrence W. Stoulig, Jr., et al. v. Cynthia Lee Traina, 169 B.R.

597 (E.D.La.1994). The trustee brings this appeal. We affirm,

essentially for the reasons stated in the district court's careful

and well considered opinion.

AFFIRMED.
No. 49787.

#### Protest 110280-K of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same as that passed upon in *Richardson*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 6, C. D. 823). In accordance therewith the court sustained the claim.