alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-663]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-31-000]


DTE Pontiac North LLC; Notice of Filing

January 11, 2007.
    Take notice that on January 4, 2007, DTE Pontiac North LLC filed a 
request for declaratory order regarding exempt wholesale generator 
status, pursuant to section 366.1 of the Commission's regulations, 18 
CFR 366.1 (2006).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#773132253438191b1e191224020707180503371112051459101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="54121106171b3a383d3a31072124243b262014323126377a333b22">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 pm eastern time on February 5, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-663 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# America the beautiful: Maryland

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  America the beautiful: Maryland 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Contour stripcropping, Harford soil conservation district 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Agriculture 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1960-1970 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  Maryland 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  150 × 60 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  A57.8-2.M36.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### The State *v.*Oscar Norton.

*Gaming—Indictment.*

An indictment for “ keeping and exhibiting a sweat-cloth on which dice were played for money,” based on Chapter 454, Volume n, Laws of Delaware, “An Act for the suppression of gaming,” is sufficient.

*(New Castle,*

*September, 1892.)*

Indictment for “unlawfully keeping and exhibiting a sweat-cloth on which dice were played for money.”

*Branch II. Giles,*Deputy Attorney General for the State.

*John Biggs,*for the prisoner.

At the trial, Giles, Deputy Attorney. General, stated in opening, that the indictment was drawn under an act in the *Revised Code-*of 1874 for the suppression of gambling, *fov/nd at page 786.*

Biggs, for the defendant, moved that the indictment be quashed on the following grounds :

1. That it does not appear in the indictment that this was a game of chance that was played, while the gist of the offence is, playing a game of chance. The allegation that it is a game of chance is material and must be alleged, in the indictment and not being alleged, there cannot be a conviction.

2. The detective says he was running a game of “sweat,” not a game of dice; there is no such a game as “dice.”

3. Even if they had alleged that it was a game of “dice,” a conviction could not be urged under it.' There was a case in Kent County during Mr. Gray’s term as Attorney General, in which the indictment was drawn alleging that a game of “cards” was being played, and Mr. Harrington objected (and the Court sustained the *587objection) that there was no such game as “cards/’ but that there is such a game as “euchre” or “whist,” etc., and that the indictment should have been that it was a game of chance.

Mr. Giles: This indictment is drawn after the only similar one I have ever known to be drawn in this State, and that was drawn by Mr. Alexander B. Cooper. We are not simply charging this man with throwing dice, on some table, for instance, or on the ground, but the indictment is drawn against this man for “keeping- and exhibiting a sweat-cloth on which dice were played for money.”

Cullen, J.: You contend that the allegation is necessary that it was a game of chance?

Mr. Biggs : Yes, sir.

Cullen, J.: In the first place, in order to sustain this indictment, there must be shown a keeping and exhibiting of some one of the articles mentioned in the Act of Assemby; and in the next place, the proof that there had been by and through that particular instrument, either the playing of cards, playing of dice, “or any other game of chance, for money.”

We think the indictment is sufficient.

Mr. Biggs : I understand your honors to rule that they do not have to allege that it is a game of chance?

Cullen, J.; No; chance is one thing, dice is another, and cards is another.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9103 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9103

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to establish an Air Force 
                Technical Training Center of Excellence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2024

Mr. Jackson of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to establish an Air Force 
                Technical Training Center of Excellence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Air Force Technical Training 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF AIR FORCE TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTER OF 
              EXCELLENCE.

    Chapter 903 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 9025. Air Force Technical Training Center of Excellence
    ``(a) Establishment.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall operate 
a Technical Training Center of Excellence. The head of the Center shall 
be the designee of the Commander of Airmen Development Command.
    ``(b) Purpose.--The purpose of the Center shall be to--
            ``(1) facilitate collaboration among all Air Force 
        technical training installations;
            ``(2) serve as a premier training location for all 
        maintainers throughout the military departments;
            ``(3) publish a set of responsibilities aimed at driving 
        excellence, innovation, and leadership across all technical 
        training specialties;
            ``(4) advocate for innovative improvements in curriculum, 
        facilities, and medial;
            ``(5) foster outreach with industry and academia;
            ``(6) identify and promulgate best practices, standards, 
        and benchmarks;
            ``(7) create a hub of excellence for the latest 
        advancements in aviation technology and training methodologies; 
        and
            ``(8) carry out such other responsibilities as the 
        Secretary determines appropriate.
    ``(c) Location.--The Secretary shall select a location for the 
Center that is an Air Force installation that provides technical 
training and maintenance proficiency.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v CHARLES DANIEL PODGURSKI, Commissaryman Third Class, U. S. Navy, Appellant

15 USCMA 491, 35 CMR 463

*492No. 18,701

July 16, 1965

*Lieutenant Craig F. Swoboda,*USNR, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Major Daniel F. McConnell,*USMC, States. was on the brief for Appellee, United

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

At accused’s trial by special court-martial, he was found guilty of three specifications of absence without leave, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, 10 USC § 886. An Additional Charge of breach of restriction) in violation of Code, supra, Article 134, 10 USC § 934, was dismissed by the president on motion of the defense. Nevertheless, in post-trial consideration of the case, both the supervisory authority and the board of review considered the dismissed offense as if accused had been convicted thereof, purporting to affirm findings of guilty thereof along with the other offenses. Such was error, requiring a new and accurate post-trial review and action by the supervisory authority in light of the correct findings of guilty. Cf. United States v James, 1 USCMA 379, 3 CMR 113; United States v Grice, 8 USCMA 166, 23 CMR 390; United States v Katzenberger, 8 USCMA 497, 24 CMR 307; United States v Lanford, 6 USCMA 371, 20 CMR 87.

The petition for review is granted. The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy, for further action consistent with this opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9014 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9014

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish and clarify the 
applicable statute of limitations for persons seeking remedy for legal 
wrongs because of agency action or adversely affected by agency action.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2024

   Mr. Nadler (for himself, Mr. Correa, Ms. Norton, Ms. Jayapal, Ms. 
    Williams of Georgia, Ms. Barragan, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Ms. 
    Scanlon, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. DeLauro, and Mr. Garcia of 
  Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish and clarify the 
applicable statute of limitations for persons seeking remedy for legal 
wrongs because of agency action or adversely affected by agency action.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Corner Post Reversal Act''.

SEC. 2. RIGHT OF REVIEW.

    Section 702 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
``Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, an action under this 
section shall be commenced within 6 years after the date on which the 
relevant agency action was finalized.'' after ``judicial review 
thereof.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8766 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to allow for cemetery flags to be 

displayed in an upright position directly adjacent to the grave sites 

of deceased members of the Armed Forces or veterans, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2024 

Mr. STEIL (for himself, Mr. BOST, Mr. BERGMAN, and Mr. VAN ORDEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to allow for cemetery 

flags to be displayed in an upright position directly adjacent to the grave sites of deceased members of the Armed 

Forces or veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Flags to 

5 Honor Our Veterans Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8766 IH

1 SEC. 2. CEMETERY FLAGS. 

2 Section 6 of title 4, United States Code, is amended 

3 by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(h) Notwithstanding any other provision of this sec5 tion, the flag may be displayed in a secured, upright posi6 tion directly adjacent to the grave site of a deceased mem7 ber of the Armed Forces (as defined in section 101 of title 

8 10) or veteran (as defined in section 101 of title 38).’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 15.1**

**Han Kun Law Offices**

**Suite 906, Office Tower C1, Oriental Plaza**

**No. 1 East Chang An Ave.**

**Beijing 100738**

**ThePeople’s Republic of China**

**Tel: (86 10) 8525 5500**

**Fax: (86 10) 8525 5511**

Date: April 20,2015 

Bitauto Holdings Limited 

New Century Hotel OfficeTower, 6/F 

No. 6 South Capital Stadium Road 

Beijing,100044 

The People’s Republic of China 

Ladies andGentlemen: 

We hereby consent to the use of our name under the captions “RISK FACTORS” and “MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATEDPARTY TRANSACTIONS” included in the Form 20-F, which will be filed by Bitauto Holdings Limited, on April 20, 2015, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “**SEC**”) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “**Annual Report**”), and further consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-171927) pertainingto the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-195428) pertaining to the 2012 Share Incentive Plan of Bitauto Holdings Limited of the summary of our opinion under the captions“RISK FACTORS” and “MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS” included in the Form 20-F. We also consent to the filing of this consent letter with the SEC as an exhibit to the Annual Report. 

Sincerely yours, 

/s/ Han Kun Law Offices
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Ride the tide, don't sink under it; in a sea of Superfund documents, NTIS is your source.

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Ride the tide, don't sink under it; in a sea of Superfund documents, NTIS is your source. 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Commerce 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Printed on recycled paper. Water Environment Federation Conference, New Orleans, Sept. 20--24, 1992. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of Commerce 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  143 × 35 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### Oceanic Trading Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6338.

Entry No. 860890, etc.

Invoices dated Vichte, Belgium, May 23, 1939, etc.

Certified May 24, 1939, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 21, 1939, etc.

(Decided September 5, 1946)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> *299It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise and issues in the appeals for reappraisement, listed in the attached schedule, are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues decided in *United States*v. *Stephen Rug Mills,*Reap. Dec. No. 6283, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appraised value of the merchandise involved in each of the eases enumerated in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value, if any, of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find tbe export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Modern Mobility Aids, Inc, (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Preston J. Shea, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant





Dated:  October 17, 2014


/s/  Preston J. SheaPreston J. Shea

President and Chief Financial Officer
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000005013-MAR-201208:31 AM