alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, James Wu, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransAKT Ltd. for
      the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of TransAKT Ltd.                                                                 

Dated: May 16, 2011

| | /s/
      James Wu                   
| | -------------------------------------
| | James Wu                             
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)        
| | TransAKT Ltd.                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TransAKT Ltd.
and will be retained by TransAKT Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8778 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8778

To waive the fee for the issuance of a passport for a family member of 
 a member of the Armed Forces who is in a hospital or medical facility 
                    abroad, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2024

  Mr. Carey (for himself and Ms. Spanberger) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive the fee for the issuance of a passport for a family member of 
 a member of the Armed Forces who is in a hospital or medical facility 
                    abroad, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Passport Fees for Heroes' 
Families Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF PASSPORT FEES FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS.

    Paragraph (2) of section 1(a) of the Passport Act of June 4, 1920 
(22 U.S.C. 214) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) and (E) as 
        subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new 
        subparagraph:
            ``(D) from a husband, wife, domestic partner, child, 
        parent, grandparent, brother, or sister of a member of the 
        Armed Forces proceeding abroad to visit such member in a 
        hospital or other medical facility;''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (E), as so redesignated, by inserting 
        ``or'' after the semicolon.
                                 <all>
```
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit

No. 01-2394 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. WALDEMAR BURGOS-CHAPARRO, Defendant, Appellant. The opinion of this court issued October 23, 2002, should be amended as follows: On page 7, line 5, replace the word "assu mes" with the word "requires."
Exhibit 35.1





Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon,
as Trustee.

I, James W. P. Hall, Vice President of The Bank of New
York Mellon, a New York corporation (the “Trustee”), states:

(a) A review of the Trustee’s activities for the period
from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Trustee’s performance under
the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated July 15, 2010 between MS Structured Asset Corp. as depositor (the “Depositor”)
and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary, in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor and
the Trustee (as amended in each such case, the “Trust Agreement”), has been made under my supervision.

(b) To the best of my knowledge and based on such review,
the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period
for CMT Linked Trust Units Series 2010-01, except for the material noncompliance described below:

- With respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(i)(A), non-compliance was identified in connection
with the SATURNS transactions related to the preparation/posting and filing of reports.





|                      |  | The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee       
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|                      |  |                                               
|                      |  |                                               
|Date: March  17, 2014 |  | By: /s/ James W. P. Hall                      
|                      |  | Name:  James W. P. Hall
 Title: Vice President
|                      |  |
Case: 2:10-cv-01097-EAS-TPK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/03/11 Page: 1 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01097-EAS-TPK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/03/11 Page: 2 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01097-EAS-TPK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/03/11 Page: 3 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01097-EAS-TPK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/03/11 Page: 4 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01097-EAS-TPK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/03/11 Page: 5 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01097-EAS-TPK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/03/11 Page: 6 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01097-EAS-TPK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/03/11 Page: 7 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01097-EAS-TPK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/03/11 Page: 8 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01097-EAS-TPK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/03/11 Page: 9 of 9  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T20:20:33-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION







I, Frank Torchia, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Torch Executive Services Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition Rules contained in SEC Release No. 33-8238;



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



















5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 

|                     |  | /s/ Frank Torchia      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | Frank Torchia          
|                     |  | Principal Executive and
|                     |  | Financial Officer      
|                     |  |
# C_2007152EN.01001201.xml

| 6.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 July 2007

(2007/C 152/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3640 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 167,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4415 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67560 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1570 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6553 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,77 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9240 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5840 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,650 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,21 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7642 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,1289 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,495 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7664 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5854 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4426 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6603 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7318 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0718 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 257,68 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5598 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3642 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3064 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 289,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7024 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,935 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0070 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,284 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3640

JPY

Japanese yen

167,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4415

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67560

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1570

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6553

ISK

Iceland króna

83,77

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9240

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5840

CZK

Czech koruna

28,650

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,21

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7642

RON

Romanian leu

3,1289

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,495

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7664

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5854

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4426

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6603

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7318

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0718

KRW

South Korean won

1 257,68

ZAR

South African rand

9,5598

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3642

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3064

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 289,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7024

PHP

Philippine peso

62,935

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0070

THB

Thai baht

42,284

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Mary Whitmark, Resp’t, *v.*William B. Lorton, App’lt.

*(New York Common Pleas, General Term,*

*Filed February 3, 1890.)*

1. Pleading—District courts—Amendment.

In the absence of clear and convincing proof to the contrary, it will not be held that a district court judge erred in allowing an action before him. to proceed as an action for conversion. The summons in such court being uniform in all actions, it is not apparent therefrom that the action was not brought for a tort.

3. Conversion—Damages.

In the absence of proof of value, nominal damages only are recoverable in an action for conversion.

3. Same—Evidence.

Proof of what plaintiff paid, or agreed to pay, for the property alleged to have been converted, is no proof of its value.

Appeal from judgment of fourth district court.

*M.*Strassman, for resp’t; *J.*Fennell, for app’lt.

Bischoff, J.

There is nothing in the justice’s return to indicate that this action was not originally brought to recover damages for conversion, and while as an abstract proposition of law the appellant’s contention that the justice had no power by way of amendment of the complaint to allow the substitution of any action sounding in tort for an action upon contract, must be conceded to be correct, 59 N. Y., 268; 74 id., 442, the action of the appellate court reversing the proceedings of the trial justice must be predicated upon clear and convincing proof that the justice erred in the exercise of his powers. The summons issued out of a district court is uniform for all actions of which such courts have jurisdiction, and it was therefore not apparent from the summons issued herein that this action was not for conversion. The certificate of the justice to the return distinctly states that the action was for damage for conversion, and the proceedings upon the trial sustain the justice. The pleadings were oral, and this court is therefore not enabled to say that the amendment allowing the action to proceed as an action for the conversion of personal property was not prudential merely, though wholly unnecessary, and for want of proof to the contrary it must be so regarded.

*323The trial judge erred, however, in awarding nominal damages to the plaintiff. There is no proof of the value of the sewing machine, for the conversion of which this action was brought, and in the absence of proof of value nominal damages only are recoverable. Conn*oss*v. Meir, 2 E. D. Smith, 314.

It is true that plaintiff testified that she had paid forty-nine dollars to one Tuclcermann on account of the purchase price of the machine, but proof of what plaintiff has paid or agreed to pay for the thing alleged to have been wrongfully converted is no proof of its value.

Judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide event

Bookstaver, J., concurs.
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Pub Crawl Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Brian McFadden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 15th day of April, 2013.








BRIAN MCFADDENBrian McFaddenChief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of DP & D, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dina Staheli, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of     1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Dina Staheli

Dina Staheli

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

August 1, 2005
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROLLY STEVANES ENOCH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-72242

Agency No. A093-321-787

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Rolly Stevanes Enoch, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration judge’s

decision denying his application withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Fakhry v.

FILED

JUN 04 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-72242

Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for

review.

Enoch did not allege that he experienced past persecution or any harm in

Indonesia. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of withholding of

removal because Enoch did not establish a clear probability of persecution on

account of his Christian religion, see Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 1173, 1179 (9th

Cir. 2007) (en banc), or his status as a publisher of a Christian newsletter, see

Fakhry, 524 F.3d at 1066. Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding

that Enoch failed to establish a pattern or practice of persecution of Christians in

Indonesia. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1060-62 (9th Cir. 2009).

Enoch does not challenge the agency’s denial of his asylum application as

time-barred or the denial of his application for relief under the Convention Against

Torture. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Fw:Docket ID No Docket ID No Docket ID No .EPA–R10–OAR–2010–0930

R10-Public Comments Public Comments Public Comments to: Todd Hawes 06/26/2012 04:06 PM

Sent by: Steve Body

History: This message has been forwarded.

----- Forwarded by Steve Body/R10/USEPA/US on 06/26/2012 04:06 PM -----

From: Marc Fleisher <marc.fleisher@gmail.com>

To: R10-Public Comments@EPA, 

Date: 06/21/2012 05:37 PM

Subject: Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2010–0930

Save Our Summers NW (SOS NW) has been concerned about the effects of crop

residue and grass field burning since 1995. In recent years, observers for

SOS NW have been monitoring the way in which the state of Idaho Department

of Environmental Quality has administered its Crop Residue Burning program .

SOS NW notes the increase over the years in burning in the southern parts

of the state, burning which has not yet in some large been brought under

the supervision on the Idaho DEQ.

I am currently a member of the Idaho DEQ Crop Residue Burning Advisory

Board.

Let me say at the outset that SOS NW endorses the excellent analysis

provided you by Patti Gora-McRavin of Safe Air For Everyone (SAFE) in her

comments on this Idaho DEQ Regional Haze Program , and endorses her

conclusions about the flaws in the DEQ analysis and her recommendations for

what the Regional haze Plan should include .

I would particularly like to emphasize that the Plan should include making

the 75% on the NAAQS, which is part of the crop residue burning SIP now in

place, part of the Regional Haze Program SIP . Rather than the recent Idaho

DEQ attempts to erode this essential part of controlling either smoke or

haze, I'd like to see it strengthened and extended to the proposed Regional

haze Plan.

SOS NW believes strongly that the effects of crop residue burning cannot

and should not be left out of consideration when it comes to the Regional

Haze Plan set forth by the DEQ. While it may not be possible to find

alternatives to wildfires, it is entirely possible for growers to find

alternatives to field burning. Growers are not paying for the crop residue

burning program as it now stands. The fact that burning costs less than

other approaches to crop management cannot any longer be put forth as an

argument for its sole use as a tool .

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Idaho DEQ Regional Haze

Plan.

Marc Fleisher, representative

Save Our Summers NW
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8717 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 20 West Main Street in Santaquin, Utah, 

as the ‘‘SGT Bill Hooser Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 8717 EH

1 SECTION 1. SGT BILL HOOSER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 20 West Main Street in 

4 Santaquin, Utah, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘SGT Bill Hooser Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘SGT Bill Hooser Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8717 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Santaquin, Utah, as the ‘‘SGT Bill Hooser Post al Service located at 20 West Main Street in