alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to Assignment and Assumption of Agreement of Purchase and Sale



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT 
 OF PURCHASE AND SALE 
 THIS AMENDMENT
TO ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION (this “Amendment to Assignment”) is dated July 27, 2008, by and between FOWLER PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Assignor”) and FPA CONIFER ASSOCIATES, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability (“Assignee”) with reference to the following: 
 WHEREAS, Assignor entered into a Purchase and Sale
Agreement for certain real property located at 3383 Holcomb Bridge Road, Norcross, Georgia (“Subject Property”) on or about April 2, 2008, as further amended from time to time, with Simpson Financing LP (“Seller”) (the
“Purchase Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, on May 22, 2008, Assignor assigned the Purchase Agreement to FPA Conifer Associates, LLC;

 WHEREAS, on July 17, 2008, Assignee filed a First Amendment to its Certificate of Formation, changing its name from FPA Conifer
Associates, LLC to FPA/PRIP Conifer, LLC; 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Assignee hereby agrees to complete the purchase of the Subject Property pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement in the name of
FPA/PRIP CONIFER, LLC. Assignee hereby reaffirms all representations, warranties and indemnities contained in the Assignment dated May 22, 2008. 
 2. A copy of the Assignee’s First Amendment to Certificate of Formation is attached hereto. 
 3. This Amendment to Assignment consists of two pages and may be signed in one or more counterparts and all such counterparts shall be treated as one agreement. Facsimile copies of signature pages of this Amendment to Assignment shall be
deemed originals for purposes of the creation of a fully executed, delivered and enforceable counterpart contract. 
 “ASSIGNOR”: 
 Fowler Property Acquisitions, LLC 
 a California limited liability company

  

			
	 By:
	 	 /s/    Michael B. Earl

		 	Michael B. Earl, Manager-Member


  

 1 








 “ASSIGNEE” 
 FPA/PRIP CONIFER, LLC 
 a Delaware limited liability company 
 By its Operating Member: 
 FPA CONIFER INVESTORS, LLC 
 a Delaware limited liability company 
 By its Manager: 
 GE CONIFER, LLC 
 a Delaware limited liability company 
  

			
	 By:
	 	 /s/    Michael B. Earl

		 	Michael B. Earl, Manager

  

 2
Slip Op. 01 - 15

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

__________________________________________

:

CAMARGO CORREA METAIS, S.A., :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : Before: MUSGRAVE, JUDGE

: Consol. Court No. 91-09-00641

THE UNITED STATES, :

:

Defendant, :

:

:

and :

:

AMERICAN ALLOYS, INC., ELKEM METALS :

CO., GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC., :

SIMETCO, INC., and SKW ALLOYS, INC., :

:

Defendant-Intervenors. :

__________________________________________:

JUDGMENT

This Court having received and reviewed United States Department of Commerce Final

Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Results”) followingCamargo Correa Metais,

S.A. v. United States, 24 CIT ___, Slip Op. 00-96 (August 4, 2000) , Defendant-Intervenors’ comments

thereon, and Commerce having complied with the Court’s remand order, and no other responses to the

Remand Results having been submitted by the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on December 1, 2000 are sustained in

their entirety; and it is further 

ORDERED that, all other issues having been decided, this matter is concluded.

__________________________________________

Dated: February 14, 2001 R. KENTON MUSGRAVE, Judge

New York, New York
AFS-13-300-E

May 02, 2013

 Exemption No. 9901B

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0592

Sheryl R. Israel, Esq.

Counsel for Republic Airline, Inc.

Hogan Lovells US, LLP

555 Thirteenth Street, NW.

Washington, DC 20004

Dear Ms. Israel:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 9901, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the 

conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 25, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Republic Airline, Inc. (Republic), for an extension of Exemption No. 9901, as 

amended. That exemption from § 121.291(b)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

allows Republic to operate the Embraer ERJ-190 without conducting a partial evacuation 

demonstration. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Republic.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9901, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, 
2

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Republic shall not change the number, location, or emergency evacuation procedures 

or duties of required flight attendants from that demonstrated on the ERJ-170. 

2. Republic shall not change the number, location, type of, or operating mechanisms of 

the installed emergency exits. 

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9901, as amended, to July 31, 

2016, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Deputy Director, Flight 

Standards Service
A-P- am-. 

March 22, 1939 

Honorable TIXI C. &in% 

State Ahditor 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sirs Opinion No. O-628 

Rer Cancellation and releas. 

IBdeN3 Railway Bonds. 

l7e are in moeipt of your letter of h!arah 22.whioh is as Poll 

. . 

"During'the year 186C sad 1881 the State purchased for its Furmanen 

Sohool Fund serial‘bonds of the TRt%RC railroad la the amount of 

#43O,soO,CC. At a laterdate there uas a default In prinoippl and : 

tern& and about1671 a speoial agraaaent was made daferrlng thema 

turitier of the obligation and providing a speo!fIoI annual payment 

prinalpal and intorest. Final paymanb of the principaland lnteres~ 

obligationms made July 14, 1936, ~This offioe Is ~satisfisd that t 

records reflect that the ~~bligatioas have been+d~Ia full to the S 

"We are advised that during the year 1936 the offioe of the Attoxng 

General of Texas rendered aa option that a joint resolution afthe 

legIslatIva.bodiis, authoriaiagthe release of the obligPtions to t 

TN&NO raIlrcPd~~uld be neoessary before-suoh release could be made 

the,'State~Treasurer aad the Governor. There‘seams to be ooasiderab 

.doubt as to the legal requirement of such a joint res@luticm or law 

uhlohevar it may be oalled, before the administrative officials of 

State osn relaare obligations whioh have been satisfied in full. I 

will thadryou to advise if a legislative sot is neosssarp bafore t 

State Treasurer and the Governor oan release the pald'krt unoanosll 

obligations of the TN&t70 railroad mfarredto above.? 

If these 'bonds and aoorued interest have been fully paid off, 

the ohlIgatIOn'oo~plstely disoharged, as stated In your latter, the 

road %axxld'undoubtbdly be entirled to the surrender and oanoellatlo 

the bonds 5.n question. ..- 

Assrrming that the bonds and Interest have been fully paid, it 

tioassaryfor the Legislature to pass aw Act or Resolution authori 

proper offioials to oanoel and surrender said bonds, and exeoute a 

widending that faot. 

CCZtFG~egw Yours very truly 

APPROVED 

/s/GERALD C. MANN ATT~GRRRRADOF 

ATlWNEy GENEEbL OFTRXAS 

By /s/ Cecil C.-C&i 

&c3istar
Exhibit 32.1

Registrant (Commission File Number 333-110029):

Broder Bros., Co.

Six Neshaminy Interplex, 6thFloor

Trevose, Pennsylvania 19053

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Broder Bros., Co. on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Myers, Chief Executive Officer of Broder Bros., Co., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broder Bros., Co.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 14, 2006



BRODER BROS., CO.By:

/s/ THOMAS MYERSThomas MyersChief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsHENRY A. DURDIN, JR.

________________________________

Case No. 2:11-cr-122 (1)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to

Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one of

the Information. After examining the Defendant under oath concerning

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that the

defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that

the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that the offenses

charged are supported by an independent basis in fact containing each

of the essential elements of such offense. 

 I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of

guilty should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty

and sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be

rejected and the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty

plea. 

The Defendant remains in the custody of the U.S. Marshal pending

sentencing. 

Date: May 25, 2011 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and

Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and

Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28

U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).

Case: 2:11-cr-00122-JLG Doc #: 23 Filed: 05/25/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case No. 15,168.

#### UNITED STATES v. FRIDENBERG.

District Court, N. D. Florida.

1869.

Internal Revenue—Fermented Liquors—Dealers—Storage—Penalty—Act July 20, 1868.

*Held,*that the word “receive” as used in the forty-sixth section of Act July 20, 1868 [15 Stat. 144], means “receive for sale,” and that where a retail liquor dealer receives more than 20 gallons of spirits from any person other than one authorized by the act to sell such spirits, for storage only, and not for sale, he does not incur the penalty.

[Decided by FRASER, District Judge. Cited in 11 Int. Rev. Rec. 5, to the point as stated above; opinion not now accessible.]
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Post-Effective Amendment to the registration statement
on Form N-4 (the "Registration Statement") of our report dated March 30, 2001,
relating to the financial statements of the Prudential Qualified Individual
Variable Contract Account, which appears in such Statement of Additional
Information.

We also consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Registration Statement of our report dated March 13,
2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements of The Prudential
Insurance Company of America and its subsidiaries, which appears in such
Statement of Additional Information.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the
Statement of Additional Information.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP
-------------------------------

New York, New York
April 23, 2001
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MARGARET J. NEFF, 

Plaintiff,

-v- Case No.: 2:10-cv-948

JUDGE SMITH

 Magistrate Judge Abel

U.S. XPRESS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This case was reported settled by the parties. The parties are working on finalizing the

terms and conditions of the settlement agreement. Based on the reported settlement, the Court

CONDITIONALLY DISMISSES this case. If the terms and conditions of the settlement

agreement have not been fulfilled by October 30, 2015, then the parties may notify the Court to

reopen this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:10-cv-00948-GCS-TPK Doc #: 85 Filed: 09/30/15 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2010-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated   March 21, 2014 |                                               |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                               |
|                        |                                               |
|                        | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|                        | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|                        | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|                        | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                        | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**





I,
      Robert
      P. May, the Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of CCH II, LLC and
      CCH
      II Capital Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
      certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission:




·
            fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934; and


·
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Robert P. May


Robert
      P.
      May


Interim
      President and Chief Executive Officer


August
      5,
      2005
No. 61983.

#### Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 151954-K and 162481-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of olives in brine similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Moscahlades Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 127, C. D. 1917), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8346)

#### John I. Carney *v.*United States

Appraisement entry No. 20.

(Decided October 14, 1954)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General *(Mollie Strum,*trial .attorney), for the defendant.

*532Ford, Judge:

This appeal involves the proper dutiable value of one Zephyr automobile which was appraised at the port of Los Angeles, Calif., at a value of $1,400. The record indicates that this automobile had been driven a distance of approximately 7,000 miles when imported and that the original purchase price was $1,514.80. The record also indicates an admission on the part of Government officials that the value at which this automobile was appraised was too high by at least $200.

Based upon the rather meager record before me, I find the proper dutiable value of the involved automobile to be $1,200. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Raul Rodriguez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00688

- CR

Trial court case number: 1348372

Trial court: 178th District Court of Harris County

T he State has filed an Unopposed Motion to Designate Issues for Oral Argument. The

motion is GRANTED as follows: while the panel may make inquiries regarding any of the issues

presented, the panel would like the focus of the argument to be on issues 1 thro ugh 4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 18 , 2014
Before the Third Division,

January 16, 1942

No. 46835.

#### Protest 971976-G of Tai Wo Tong Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) the merchandise in question was held entitled to free entry as crude drugs under paragraph 1669 as claimed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-60,884]

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at C.A. Lawton Company, Machinery Division, De Pere, Wisconsin. The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-60,884; C.A. Lawton Company, Machinery Division, De Pere, Wisconsin, (April 2, 2007)

Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of April 2007.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E7-6660 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Government Properties Trusts,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas D. Peschio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

    Date: August 16, 2004                     /s/ Thomas D. Peschio
                                              ---------------------
                                              Thomas D. Peschio
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:11-cr-104

Richard A. Peake 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 18) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: May 31, 2011 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cr-00104-JLG Doc #: 20 Filed: 05/31/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>