alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

ARTHUR STROZEWSKI,

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:10-cv-1128

v. Judge Algenon L. Marbley

 Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

ROD’S WESTERN

PALACE, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

ADOPTION ORDER

 This matter is before the Court for consideration of the May 23, 2011 Report and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers, to whom

this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (ECF No. 32.) The Magistrate Judge

recommended that the Court grant dismiss Defendant Olia Jewelry without prejudice pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). 

The Report and Recommendation specifically advises parties that the failure to object to

the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results in a “waiver of the

right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment

of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 2, ECF No. 32.) The time period for filing

objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. The parties have not objected to the

Report and Recommendation. 

Case: 2:10-cv-01128-ALM-EPD Doc #: 40 Filed: 07/08/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections

have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the

Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Defendant Olia Jewelry

WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DATED: June 8, 2011

2

Case: 2:10-cv-01128-ALM-EPD Doc #: 40 Filed: 07/08/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto
Owner Trust 2010-B (Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act period reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and
based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer
compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled
its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Brian E. SchaafBrian E. SchaafVice President and Assistant Treasurer
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer
(senior officer in charge of servicing function)
#### Martin Barney, App’lt, *v.*Lewis E. Fuller *et al.,*Resp’ts.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Filed 3/19/14 P. v. Gutierrez CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.
JOE GUTIERREZ,
Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B244091 (Super. Ct. No. MA051431) (Los Angeles County)

Joe Gutierrez appeals from the judgment after a jury convicted him of first degree burglary and receiving stolen pr operty. (Pen. Code, §§ 459 & 496.) 1 Appellant admitted two prior strike conv ictions (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i ), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)), and one prior serious felony convi ction. (§ 667, subd. (a).) The trial court sentenced him as a third strike offender to an aggregate term of 30 years to life in state prison. On December 30, 2010, appellant and an accomplice broke into the victims' home and took their property. They put the pr operty in appellant’s car and drove away. We appointed counsel to represent appe llant in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.2 We advised appellant that he had 30 days within wh ich to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. No response has been
received.
We have reviewed the available record, including sealed documents presented during proceedings conducted pursuant to Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11
Cal.3d 531. We are satisfie d that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 125, 126.) The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

PERREN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

YEGAN, J.3 John Murphy, Judge Superior Court County of Los Angeles

________________ ______________

Christopher Love, under appointme nt by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTINA PAYLAN, M.D., )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1525

)

CAROLE MORALES and LOUIS )

MORALES, )

)

Respondents. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed October 12, 2018.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit 

Court for Hillsborough County; Robert A. 

Foster, Jr., Judge.

Christina Paylan, M.D., pro se. 

Nicholas G. Matassini and Joseph G. 

Alvarez of The Matassini Law Firm, P.A., 

Tampa (withdrew after briefing); Victor L. 

Zamora, Jr., of Viza Law LLC, Tampa 

(substituted as counsel of record), for 

Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Denied. 

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
# C_2007211EN.01003302.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/33

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 27 June 2007 — V v Parliament

(Case T-345/05 R II)

(Application for interim measures - Waiver of the immunity of a Member of the European Parliament - Application for suspension of operation - Urgency)

(2007/C 211/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: V (represented by: J. Lofthouse and E. Hayes, Barristers, and M. Monan, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: H. Krück, D. Moore and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for re-examination of the applicant's first application for interim measures, dismissed by order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 16 March 2007 in Case T-345/05 R V v Parliament, not published in the ECR.

V

Parliament

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
----

|  | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of BioLineRx Ltd.; |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in              light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial              condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 4. | The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules              13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 5. | The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s              auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
**Study     of the Marin Baylands    National Wildlife Refuge Proposal**********
****
**The following documents are available for the study     of the Marin Baylands proposal.**
Marin Baylands Planning Updated # 4, July 2002 (PDF     File 100 kb)
Marin Baylands Study Schedule     Update.
 (PDF File 172kb) 

Marin Baylands Study Area Maps     now available through several sources.
 (PDF File 724kb) 
Marin Baylands Study Area Maps     are now available at libraries.
 (PDF File 724kb) 
Marin Baylands Study - Planning Update     # 3
 (PDF File 681kb) 
Go to www.lizardtech.com to download     the MrSID Browser Plug-in a free map viewer for the following maps.
Marin Baylands Study Area Map
     (SID File 681kb) 
Marin Baylands Alternatives 1     and 2 Maps
 (SID File 681kb) 
Marin Baylands Alternatives 3     and 4 Maps
 (SID File 681kb) 
Marin Baylands Study - Planning     Update # 2 Correction Notice
 (PDF File 681kb)
Marin Baylands Study - Planning Update     # 2
 (PDF File 681kb) 
Marin Baylands Study - Planning Update # 1
 (PDF File     724kb) 
Marin Baylands Study - Planning Update # 1     - Correction Notice
 (PDF File 87kb)
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            | Summit Hotel OP, LP                                                                |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | By: Summit Hotel GP, LLC, its general partner                                      |
|                            | By: Summit Hotel Properties, Inc., its sole member                                 |
|                            |                                                                               |
| Date:  March 31, 2011 | By:   /s/  Daniel P. Hansen                               |
|                            | Daniel P. HansenPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
Opinion filed September 19, 2024

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-24-00238-CR

__________

IN RE JUSTIN W. FULLER

Original Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator, Justin W. Fuller, filed this original proceeding pro se seeking relief 

against the Erath County District Clerk1 (Respondent). According to Relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus, his constitutional rights have been violated. Relator

requests that this court order the district clerk to “perform a legal duty,” specifically, 

to “[f]ile any and all motion[s] mailed to” the district clerk’s office, and asserts that 

the district clerk’s office “cannot [r]ecommend whether to file a certain pleading.”

1

Relator seeks relief against the “Clerk of Court.” Although Erath County has separately elected 

district and county clerks, Relator served the district clerk with his petition, and attached a document in 

support of his petition from the district clerk’s office.
2

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must establish that: (1) the act 

sought to be compelled is a ministerial act not involving a discretionary or judicial 

decision; and (2) there is no adequate remedy at law to redress the alleged harm. In 

re Meza, 611 S.W.3d 383, 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 2020) (orig. proceeding).

This court’s authority to exercise original jurisdiction is limited. See TEX.

CONST. art. V, §§ 5, 6 (intermediate courts of appeals only have original jurisdiction 

as prescribed by law); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2023) (limited 

writ powers granted to courts of appeals). We do not have writ jurisdiction over a 

district clerk’s office unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction in another 

proceeding. In re Smith, 263 S.W.3d 93, 95 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, 

orig. proceeding); see GOV’T CODE § 22.221.

Relator has not demonstrated that our jurisdiction is implicated here, or that 

the Erath County District Clerk’s Office is a party against whom we may issue a writ 

under the circumstances. As a result, we have no jurisdiction as an intermediate 

appellate court to address this original proceeding. To the extent Relator seeks relief 

against the district clerk and the district clerk’s office, we lack jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

JOHN M. BAILEY

CHIEF JUSTICE

September 19, 2024

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.20



                  FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE GEEG HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
                                2000 OPTION PLAN
                                ----------------

         This First Amendment (this "First Amendment") to the GEEG Holdings,
L.L.C. 2000 Option Plan (the "Plan") of GEEG Holdings, L.L.C., a Delaware
limited liability company (the "Company"), has been deemed advisable and has
been adopted pursuant to the terms of Section 6.7 of the Plan by the Company's
Board of Directors and is effective on December 19, 2000. Terms used herein but
not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Plan.

         1.       AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN.

         EXERCISE PROCEDURE. Section 5.2(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and
restated to read as follows:

         "(a) EXERCISE PROCEDURE. Options shall be exercisable to the extent
they are vested, by written notice to the Company (to the attention of the
Company's Secretary) accompanied by payment in full of the applicable exercise
price. Payment of such exercise price shall be made in cash (including check,
bank draft, money order or wire transfer of immediately available funds)."

2.       THE PLAN. In all other respects, the Plan is ratified and shall, as so
                       changed by this First Amendment, continue in full force
                       and effect.
No. 48617.

#### Protests 547872-G, etc., of Millinery Clearing House (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony of the only witness showed that certain of the items consist of harvest hats similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). The protests were therefore sustained as to these items.
No. 65634.

#### D. N. & E. Walter & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 59/32371, 59/32717, and 60/2781 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Harold C.F. Dickout, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Americas Wind Energy
      Corporation for the period ended January 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Americas Wind Energy Corporation.                                                                  

Dated: March 16, 2010

| | /s/
      Harold C.F. Dickout                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Harold C.F. Dickout                                    
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman
      and 
| | Director                                               
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)              
| | Americas Wind Energy Corporation                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Americas Wind
Energy Corporation and will be retained by Americas Wind Energy Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
(Reap. Dec. 8207)

#### United States *v.*J. D. Smith Inter-Ocean, Inc.

Entry No. 21146.

(Decided March 20, 1953)

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to merchandise described on the invoice as “500-Bonito Fish in Brine, Choice Quality, solid pack, 48/1 s Tall American containers, labeled ‘Plahos Brand’.” The shipment was exported from Callao, Peru, and entered at the port of New York.

At the trial, the case was submitted on an oral stipulation wherein the parties agreed that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for appraisement of the item in question, and that such statutory value is the appraised unit value, of $13 per carton of 48 tins, net packed, and “that the cost of American goods returned consisted of tins and paper cartons at $2. per carton of 48 tins which is included in the unit value * * *.”

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32

Via
EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of TEL Offshore Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon
    Trust Company, N.A.
Corporate Trustee for TEL Offshore TrustNovember 13, 2008

By:

/s/ MIKE ULRICH Mike UlrichVice President


---



QuickLinks