alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1





Certification by the Principal Executive
Officer



Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



I, Bin Liu, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of
ChinaCache International Holdings, Ltd.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The company’s other certifying officer and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the company and have:



(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



(c)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting;



5.  The company’s other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors
and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: November 29, 2019 |                               
|----------------------- | ------------------------------
|                        |                               
|By:                     | /s/ Bin Liu                   
|Name:                   | Bin Liu                       
|Title:                  | Acting Chief Executive Officer
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Quality principles Naval Air Test Center. Patuxent River, Maryland.

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Quality principles Naval Air Test Center. Patuxent River, Maryland. 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Navy, Naval Air Test Center, Technical Information Dept 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 91-127-P.Contains several humorous cartoons depicting quality work habits in the workplace. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  Patuxent River (Md.) 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  Maryland 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  140 × 55 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Yellow7, Inc.. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason Burgess President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Signature

Title/s/ Jason Burgess

Principal Executive OfficerJason Burgess

Treasurer and Director/s/ Jon Burgess

Principal Financial OfficerJon Burgess

Principal Accounting OfficerSecretary and Director
# C_2007269EN.01000203.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/2

---

Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Court

(2007/C 269/04)

At its meeting on 9 October 2007, the Court drew up the lists referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure for determining the composition of the Chambers of three Judges as follows:

Fifth Chamber

Mr Schintgen

Mr Borg Barthet

Mr Ilešič

Mr Levits

Sixth Chamber

Sir Konrad Schiemann

Mr Makarczyk

Mr Kūris

Mr Bonichot

Ms Toader

Seventh Chamber

Mr Cunha Rodrigues

Mr Klučka

Mr Ó Caoimh

Ms Lindh

Mr Arabadjiev

Eighth Chamber

Ms Silva de Lapuerta

Mr Juhász

Mr Malenovský

Mr von Danwitz

---
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Dina Staheli, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DP & D, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.







Date:  October 25, 2005

/s/ Dina Staheli

President
(Reap. Dec. 8202)

#### Joseph C. Murray *&*Company v. United States

Entry No. 847868.

(Decided February 11, 1953)

■Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

An importation from Denmark of 10 cases containing 240 gold-rimmed drinking glasses and 1 case containing assorted printed matter and other articles was made by plaintiff for the account of Danisco, Inc., of New York City. All of said articles were enumerated on a single invoice, but, it appearing therefrom that the glasses were of Swedish origin, while the other articles were of Danish origin, plaintiff made entry of the glassware at a total value of 528 Swedish kronor, or 2.20 Swedish kronor each, and the shipment was appraised as entered.

Subsequent to appraisement, plaintiff learned from the ultimate consignee that the entire invoice was stated in Danish kroner and that, therefore, a mistake had been made in the consumption entry. Accordingly, the instant appeal for reappraisement was filed.

At the trial, counsel for the Government made the following statement:

> Mb. Spector: The Government, upon advice from Examiner Shapiro, feels that the appraisement should have been 2.20 Danish Krone each, packed instead *522of 2.20 Swedish Krona as entered. Apparently, for the edification of the Court, this merchandise was appraised as entered, but it was entered and appraised on the basis of Swedish Krona. It should have been Danish Krone * * *.

The case was thereupon submitted.

In view of the foregoing statement and other data to be found in the official papers, I find the rabie of 240 gold-rimmed glasses to be 2.20 Danish kroner each.

Judgment will be entered accordingly. .
Case No. 5,430.

#### GILL v. PATTON.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 188.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1804.

Covenant ron Rent — Interest.

In an action of covenant for rent, the landlord cannot recover interest.

Writ of inquiry, upon a judgment on demurrer in an action of covenant on a lease; breach, not paying rent

C. Lee, for defendant,

contended that as the landlord has a summary process to compel payment, he is not entitled to interest.

Mr. Youngs. The action is covenant and sounds in damages, and the jury alone can assess them.

THE COURT

instructed the jury that they were as much bound to give interest on the arrears of rent as on any other debt by specialty; that it is in the power of the jury to refuse interest; and if they refuse, it is in the power of the court to grant a new trial.

Yerdict for plaintiff, including interest.

A new trial was afterwards granted on the ground of misdirection of the jury by the court

[See Cases Nos. 5,427-5,420.]
NUMBER 13-23-00452-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE CHANTEL ELIZONDO

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Silva and Peña

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras1

By petition for writ of mandamus, relator Chantel Elizondo seeks to compel the trial 

court to vacate the following orders signed on October 23, 2023: (1) the “Order on Father’s 

Motion for Emergency Relief Regarding Travel Authorization”; and (2) the “Order on 

Father’s Motion for Alternative Relief.” Relator further seeks to stay all trial court 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 

47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

proceedings pending the resolution of this petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.10.

Mandamus is an extraordinary and discretionary remedy. See In re Allstate Indem. 

Co., 622 S.W.3d 870, 883 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836, 

840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 

S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). The relator must show that (1) the trial 

court abused its discretion, and (2) the relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re 

USAA Gen. Indem. Co., 624 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re 

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d at 135–36; Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 

839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met her burden to obtain 

mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus, and we similarly 

deny relator’s request to stay the trial court proceedings.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the

25th day of October, 2023.
l^^^^^ ^ ? r^^^-^ C^ [j 

DiV oi 

CITX •^•f i 

• > • r • • ' -.•:•; • J1 J r 

i;- r^ ' -A .: • il l 

'C\^A 

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 

April 1(K :()I I 

Ml. Dennis DeVain. <"liiel I s^ential Air Sci\ icc 1 Ji\i<ion 

1 HVicc 111 Aviiilinn AiuiKsis 

' 'S. Dciiailmeni (^fTraiT^pniiantm ^ 

i:i'0 \i-\v .lol^Oy A\i.-.. SK 

•^^':l^l^inl:lon. \).C. 2i)f^^n^ 

!.hn-k\'f \'nn)hi-/ !)<)/ -()sr~:'ii)!- lii6.'s^ L ^ 

Ileal Mr. DoV'aiiy: " 

.\-< Mil) 01 niilK* (.'iiy 01 Mii'ion C'ii\. iowj. I .siippi*ri the Nfcsaha A\ iaiioii. Inc. propo>al and 

i,tKULirauc \t'U and UIL- I .*^. !).< >. I < tW'wjt: lo iLXOininund auaidiiiu ihc IA S t,iMitr.ii.i Ui \IL'^;III;I 

.\\iation. Inc. 

Mcsahi^'s proposal uill ensure diere is supcrit^r qualiu ol'air service available Irom the Masori 

( it> Airport, which is ver\ imporiani to ihe resident*^ ;uui bu.'^incases ol" Mason I'ltv, a*; well a*^ 

die i'UrroiindinL: coinnuinuies 

I appieeiau \our con^ideralion ol my coininciUs ,ind look toiuard lo hcarniLZ ihe laiLd dec:%ion 

i'li air -^crMce ttir Mason ti u 

SHKCICIV. 

l>ic llookmeyer 

Mavnr 

•. •• i • •! -.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8724 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8724

 To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to allow States to waive 
certain administrative requirements for recertification, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2024

   Ms. Barragan (for herself, Ms. Norton, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. 
    Tlaib, and Mr. Carson) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to allow States to waive 
certain administrative requirements for recertification, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SNAP Recertification Reform Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR 
              RECERTIFICATION UNDER SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 11(e)(6) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 
2008 (7 U.S.C. 2020(e)(6)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) the State agency may waive recertification 
                interviews required by the Secretary subject to the 
                condition that the applicant--
                            ``(i) waives the interview; and
                            ``(ii) has already demonstrated eligibility 
                        for the continuation of benefits; and
                    ``(D) if the Secretary requires an applicant 
                interview for recertification, the State agency shall 
                give the applicant the option to conduct the interview 
                in-person, by phone, virtually, or through any other 
                medium determined by the Secretary to reduce 
                administrative burden;''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 41902.

#### Protest 940449-G of S. Lisk & Bro. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of squawker balloons similar to those the subject of Abstract 40493. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 409 was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen H. Mauldin, Chief Executive Officer and Kevin R. Maddron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date:  March 29, 2016 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Stephen H. Mauldin                                         |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |   |   |   | Stephen H. Mauldin                                             |
|                            |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                                        |
|                            |   |   |   |                                                           |
| Date:  March 29, 2016 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Kevin R. Maddron                                           |
|                            |   |   |   | Kevin R. Maddron                                               |
|                            |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief Operating Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gryphon Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony D.J. Ker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:

February 12, 2008

By:  /s/ Anthony D.J. Ker



Anthony D.J. Ker

Chief Executive Officer



---
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Officer Certifications**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Adecoagro S.A., a corporation organized under the form of a *société anonyme*under the laws of the Grand Duchy ofLuxembourg (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that: 

The annual report onForm 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained inthe Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: April 27, 2012 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.