alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Bee smart! don't bug bees! honey bees are important insects because they make honey and beeswax and pollinate many fruits and vegetables.

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Bee smart! don't bug bees! honey bees are important insects because they make honey and beeswax and pollinate many fruits and vegetables. 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 91-500-P. "Issued May 1991." 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  130 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JASON TOLLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1865

[August 23, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr., 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 92-21104CF10B.

Jason Tolley, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Janvier v. State, 123 So. 3d 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

WARNER, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
From: "Matt Todd" <ToddM@api.org>

To: Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jan Tierney/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "John Wagner" <Wagner@api.org>

Date: 01/28/2010 03:38 PM Subject: Cooling Tower Monitoring

Brenda,

Attached are supplemental comments in response to issues raised during our conference call in December on the cooling tower monitoring. Let me know if you have any follow up questions.

Thanks,

Matt

Matthew Todd API 1220 L Street NW Washington DC 20005 202.682.8319 www.api.org
No. 44153.

#### Protest 936893-G of Premier Dental Products Co. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the merchandise consists of dental cement powder the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Premier Dental Products Co.*v. *United States*(28 C. C. P. A. — , C. A. D. 123) the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 205 (d) was sustained as to the dental cement powder. It was further stipulated that some of the merchandise consists of dental cement liquid the same as that the subject of *Premier Dental Products Co.*v. *United States*(T. D. 49301). In accordance therewith the dental cement liquid was held dutiable as a chemical compound at 25 percent under paragraph 5 as claimed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-48,152-08

Ex parte GARCIA GLEN WHITE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

IN CAUSE NO. 723847 IN THE 180 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TH

HARRIS COUNTY

RICHARDSON, J., filed a concurring opinion in which HERVEY and NEWELL, JJ.,

joined.

CONCURRING OPINION

I agree with the Court’s interpretation of the statutory language in question. It would

seem that the plain language of Article 11.073 restricts the meaning of the phrase, “would

not have been convicted,” to apply only to the verdict of guilt and not to the assessment of

punishment. This is consistent with the Court’s interpretation of this exact phrase in Ex parte

Gutierrez, 337 S.W.3d 883, 901 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). And, as noted by the majority,

Gutierrez was decided two years before Article 11.073 was enacted. The Legislature was

aware of how the phrase, “would not have been convicted,” would be interpreted by this

Court. Had the Legislature intended Article 11.073 to apply to punishment, it could have

explicitly said so. Therefore, I join the majority.
White Concurring Opinion — 2

However, this is a harsh result, particularly in a death penalty case where the jury is

often asked to evaluate expert scientific testimony and scientific evidence in assessing

whether the death penalty is the proper punishment. The points made by the dissenting

opinion are valid. In my opinion, Article 11.073 should have been written to apply to both

the guilt and punishment phases of a trial—at least a death penalty trial.

FILED: November 2, 2016

PUBLISH
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Robert P. May, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corp.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  [Reserved];  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and theaudit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 11, 2005        /s/ Robert P. May   Robert P. May   Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2007202EN.01000101.xml

| 30.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 August 2007

(2007/C 202/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3631 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,48 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4464 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3987 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6370 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,52 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9565 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,628 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 257,57 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6984 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8358 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2550 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,833 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8110 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6713 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4464 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6331 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9527 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0774 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 284,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8985 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2896 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3212 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 833,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7749 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,793 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0330 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,594 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3631

JPY

Japanese yen

156,48

DKK

Danish krone

7,4464

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67720

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3987

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6370

ISK

Iceland króna

87,52

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9565

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,628

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

257,57

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6984

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8358

RON

Romanian leu

3,2550

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,833

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8110

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6713

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4464

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6331

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9527

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0774

KRW

South Korean won

1 284,04

ZAR

South African rand

9,8985

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2896

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3212

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 833,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7749

PHP

Philippine peso

63,793

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0330

THB

Thai baht

44,594

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

RICHARD L. QUINN, JR.,

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:11-cv-00268

v. Judge James L. Graham 

 Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

ROBIN KNAB, WARDEN,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the January 9, 2012 Report and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers. (ECF No.

30.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss Defendants Mohr and Freeman

from this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to

timely effect service of process.

The Report and Recommendation specifically advises Plaintiff that the failure to object to

the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results in a “waiver of the

right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment

of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 2, ECF No. 30.) The time period for filing

objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not objected to the

Report and Recommendation. 

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections have

Case: 2:11-cv-00268-JLG-EPD Doc #: 37 Filed: 02/01/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report

and Recommendation. (ECF No. 30.) Accordingly, the Defendants Mohr and Freeman are

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/ James L. Graham 

James L. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Date: February 1, 2012

2

Case: 2:11-cv-00268-JLG-EPD Doc #: 37 Filed: 02/01/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
(Reap. Dec. 8876)

Entry No. 807088.

#### R. J. Saunders & Company, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 25, 1957.)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise and the issues in this Appeal for Reappraisement are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issues decided in the case of *United States*v. *Nelson Bead Co.,*C. A. D. 590, and that the record in said case be incorporated and made a part of the record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the entered value of the merchandise covered by this Appeal for Reappraisement is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for *547the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the entered value.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frederick Larcombe, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: November 30, 2012 | /s/ Frederick Larcombe       
|------------------------ | -----------------------------
|                         | By:  Frederick Larcombe      
|                         | Its:  Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. and will be retained by Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Name: Santiago Fermin Wirsch

.

Address:

2937, Bee Ridge Rd Suite 2

Sarasota, Florida

34239

Contact:

Telephone: 941 322 4676

E

- mail: s antiago @ inquima.com.br

Section of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) from which an exemption is seek:

Title 14 CFR 47.65

E xtent of relief which is seeking and the reason the relief is seek:

Eligibility

I’m the president of Wirsch Corp . This is an American company which is engaged on the

airplane leasing . I’m Brazilian and not

- citize n of United States of American and it makes me not

eligible to apply for the Dealer’s Aircraft Registration Certificate.

How the request would benefit the public as a whole:

With the exemption granted and eligible to apply for the Dealer’s Aircraft Registration

Certificate, I will be able to continue trading and leasing planes between USA and Brazil, which

is good for both countries.

Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect s afety, or how the exemption would provide a

level of safety at least equal to the existing rule:

There is no reason in this process that could affect safety. The reason for the exemption

requirement is because the applicant is a non

- citizen of United Stat es of America.

Summary of the rule which is applied an exemption:

Title 14 CFR § 47.65

Eligibility.

To be eligible for a Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificate, AC Form 8050

- 6, the applicant must

have an established place of business in the United States, must be substantially engaged in

manufacturing or selling aircraft, and must be a citizen of the United States, as defined by 49

U.S.C. 40102 (a)(15).

Brief of the exemption which I seek:

I’m Argentine , president of the Wirsch Corp ., an American company.

The company make s trade and lease airplanes with Brazilian customers who buy and lease used

aircraft in the Unite d States of America.

The Brazilian aviation agency, ANAC, is requesting the Dealer’s Aircraft Registration Certificate

for the import process of an aircraft since December 2012. I need this exemption to be eligible

for a Dealer’s Aircraft Registration Cert ificate for my company.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic StandardsChange AgentsChange StrategiesEducational ChangeEducational ImprovementEducational InnovationEducational TechnologyElementary Secondary EducationInquiryLearning ProcessesMathematics EducationScience EducationTeacher AttitudesTeaching Methods

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Case No. 13,877.

#### THELASSON v. CRAMMOND.

[1 Wash. C. C. 319.] 3

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

(Adjourned) Oct. Term. 1806.

Award — Report of Referees — Exceptions — Additional Pacts.

When facts to sustain an additional exception to the report of referees, have been discovered, since the period for filing exceptions has passed; the court will allow the additional exception to be filed: although, if no exceptions had been filed in time, the discovery of such circumstances would noi induce the court to allow them to be filed.

[Cited in Messenger v. Broom, 1 Pin. 640.]

[See Case No. 13,878.]

3

 [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard Peters, Jr., Esq.]

Upon an affidavit that the defendant had not, until last night, discovered ground for an additional exception to the award; THE COURT permitted him to file it, saying; though the same reason might not have been a sufficient one to sanction the filing of exceptions originally, after the four days, because then the cause might be out of the reach of THE COURT; yet, as the cause is depending, an amendment may be made, where the proper foundation is laid for asking the indulgence.
EXHIBIT 99.13



CONSENT OF ANTHONY SANFORD



Reference is made to the technical report
entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Moro Gold-Silver Project, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina” dated
March 30, 2012, which contains certain scientific and technical information related to the Cerro Moro property of Extorre Gold
Mines Limited (the “Technical Report”).



I hereby consent to the inclusion of references
to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Extorre
Gold Mines Limited, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



Dated this April 2, 2012.



|/s/ Anthony Sanford                           | 
|--------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  Anthony Sanford, BSc, MBA, Pr.Sci.Nat. |
**Exhibit
      32.2**














**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**









I,
      Jeffrey T. Fisher, the Chief Financial Officer of CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital
      Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that,
      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
      2006 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:




·
            fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934; and




·
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









/s
      Jeffrey T. Fisher


Jeffrey
      T. Fisher


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


August
      10, 2006