alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007247EN.01002801.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/28

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2007 — Koipe v OHIM — Aceites del Sur (La Espoñola)

(Case T-363/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark ‘La Española’ - Opposition by the proprietor of the national and Community figurative marks ‘Carbonell’ - Rejection of the opposition - Dominant elements - Similarity - Likelihood of confusion - Power to alter decisions)

(2007/C 247/43)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Koipe Corporación SL (San Sebastián, Spain) (represented by: M. Fernández de Béthencourt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Aceites del Sur SA (Seville, Spain) (represented by: C.L. Fernández-Palacios and R. Jiménez Díaz, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 May 2004 (R 1109/2000-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Koipe Corporación SL and Aceites del Sur SA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Alters the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 May 2004 (Case R 1109/2000-4) so as to hold that the appeal brought by the applicant before the Board of Appeal is well founded and, consequently, that the opposition is to be upheld. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Alters the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 May 2004 (Case R 1109/2000-4) so as to hold that the appeal brought by the applicant before the Board of Appeal is well founded and, consequently, that the opposition is to be upheld.

| 2. | Orders OHIM and the intervener to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM and the intervener to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

1

---
# C_2007140EN.01000801.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 20 March 2007 — Communication Services TELE2 GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-153/07)

(2007/C 140/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Communication Services TELE2 GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Defendant:

Intervener: Deutsche Telekom AG

Intervener:

Questions referred

Are Commission Directive 90/388/EEC of 28 June 1990 on competition in the markets for telecommunications services (Competition Directive) (1) and Directive 97/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 on interconnection in telecommunications with regard to ensuring universal service and interoperability through application of the principles of Open Network Provision (ONP) (Interconnection Directive) (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the national regulatory authority is precluded from requiring, in 2003, the operator of a network which is interconnected with a public local telecommunications network to pay a contribution to the market-dominant operator of the local network in order to compensate him for the deficit incurred as a result of providing the local loop?

1

2

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative:

Is the incompatibility with Community law of such a requirement, which is a provision of domestic law, to be taken into account by the national court in proceedings concerning the approval of a contribution by the interconnected network operator?

---

(1)  OJ 1990 L 192, p. 10.

1

(2)  OJ 1997 L 199, p. 32.

2

---
# C_2007269EN.01006102.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/61

---

Action brought on 12 September 2007 — Al-Aqsa v Council of the European Union

(Case T-348/07)

(2007/C 269/111)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Stichting Al-Aqsa (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: J. Pauw, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council Decision 2007/445/EC in so far as it applies to the applicant, and declare that Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 does not apply to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Decision 2007/445/EC in so far as it applies to the applicant, and declare that Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 does not apply to the applicant;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submits that Council Decision 2007/445/EC of 28 June 2007 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism is void in so far as it relates to it.

In support of its application, the applicant submits, first, that the Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (1) does not apply to it.

1

Second, the applicant submits that no competent authority has taken a decision with respect to the applicant within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the Council Common Position of 27 December 2001.

Third, the applicant states that it has had no intention, culpability or knowledge with regard to the support of terrorist activities.

Fourth, according to the applicant, it is apparent from neither the statement of grounds in the contested decision nor the underlying national decision that it can still be regarded as facilitating terrorist acts.

Finally, the applicant complains of breach of the principle of proportionality, of essential procedural requirements inasmuch as the Council has not investigated the desirability of maintaining the applicant on the list, of the right to unfettered enjoyment of property, and of the requirement for a proper statement of reasons.

---

(1)  2001/931/CFSP (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 93).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       UT
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE TAMPA
ELECTIC  COMPANY  BALANCE  SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000096271          
<NAME>                          Tampa Electric Company  
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-mos 
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK 
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        2,628 
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          8 
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             295 
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           239
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,170 
<COMMON>                                           119 
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                          915 
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                286 
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,320 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               774 
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      92 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        5 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0 
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0 
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0 
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     979 
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    3,170 
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                          332 
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                20 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         262
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         282
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             50 
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0 
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      50 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            15 
<NET-INCOME>                                        35 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0 
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       35 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            37
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           10
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                              77
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00 <PAGE>

</TABLE>
# C_2007276EN.01001101.xml

| 17.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/11

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4893 — Quebecor World/RSDB)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 276/10)

| 1. | On 9 November 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Quebecor World Inc. (‘Quebecor’, Canada) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation (negative) sole control of the whole of RSDB NV (‘RSDB’, the Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 9 November 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Quebecor World Inc. (‘Quebecor’, Canada) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation (negative) sole control of the whole of RSDB NV (‘RSDB’, the Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for undertaking Quebecor: provider of print solutions, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for undertaking Quebecor: provider of print solutions,

| — | for undertaking RSDB: provider of printing services. |
| --- | --- |

—

for undertaking RSDB: provider of printing services.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4893 — Quebecor World/RSDB, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4893 — Quebecor World/RSDB, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsCarrie A. Kight

________________________________

Case No. 2:11-cr-128 (2)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to

Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one of

the Indictment. After examining the Defendant under oath concerning

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that the

defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that

the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that the offenses

charged are supported by an independent basis in fact containing each

of the essential elements of such offense. 

 I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of guilty

should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty and

sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be

rejected and the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty

plea. 

The Defendant remains on Bond pending sentencing. 

Date: 7/26/2011 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and

Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and

Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28

U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).

Case: 2:11-cr-00128-JLG-TPK Doc #: 232 Filed: 07/27/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cv-00616-EAS-TPK Doc #: 80 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00616-EAS-TPK Doc #: 80 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00616-EAS-TPK Doc #: 80 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T09:35:39-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 32

Via
EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of TEL Offshore Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon
    Trust Company, N.A.,
Corporate Trustee for TEL Offshore TrustDate: August 12, 2011

By:

/s/ MIKE ULRICH Mike Ulrich Vice President


---



QuickLinks
# C_2007269EN.01005202.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/52

---

Action brought on 3 September 2007 — Caisse Fédérale du Crédit Mutuel Centre Est Europe v OHIM (SURFCARD)

(Case T-325/07)

(2007/C 269/94)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Caisse Fédérale du Crédit Mutuel Centre Est Europe (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: P. Greffe and J. Schoumann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 June 2007, Case R 1130/2006-1 refusing application for registration of Community trade mark ‘SURFCARD’, application No 3 837 564, for goods and services sought in classes 9, 36 and 38; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 June 2007, Case R 1130/2006-1 refusing application for registration of Community trade mark ‘SURFCARD’, application No 3 837 564, for goods and services sought in classes 9, 36 and 38;

| — | Registration of Community trade mark ‘SURFCARD’ No 3 837 564 for all of the goods and services sought. |
| --- | --- |

—

Registration of Community trade mark ‘SURFCARD’ No 3 837 564 for all of the goods and services sought.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘SURFCARD’ for goods and services in classes 9, 36 and 38 (application No 3 837 564)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of examiner: Application for registration partially refused

Decision of examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Action dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b)of Regulation No 40/94 of the Council (1) in that, according to the applicant and contrary to observations in the contested decision, the expression ‘SURFCARD’ is arbitrary and distinctive in relation to the goods and services sought.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman LLC (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter R. Huntsman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|/s/PETER R. HUNTSMANPeter R. Huntsman Chief Executive
OfficerMay 11, 2005 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
No. 53111.

#### Chan Kee Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 82317-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00002-CV

______________________________

IN RE: ADONIS TARBUTTON

 

Original Mandamus Proceeding

 

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Adonis Tarbutton has petitioned this Court to issue a writ of mandamus compelling Collin

CountyCriminal District AttorneyJohn Roach to provide anyexculpatoryevidence Roach may have

in his possession. We are without jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district attorney.

See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004); In re Ruston, No. 05-07-01379-CV, 2007

Tex. App. LEXIS 8726 (Tex. App.—Dallas Nov. 2, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., released for

publication).

We deny Tarbutton's petition.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: January 15, 2008

Date Decided: January 16, 2008
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# DLA's vision: to continually improve the combat readiness of America's fighting forces by providing our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines the best value supplies and services, when and where needed

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  DLA's vision: to continually improve the combat readiness of America's fighting forces by providing our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines the best value supplies and services, when and where needed 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Defense Logistics Agency 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Defense Logistics Agency 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  022933551.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -