alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30597 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BELINDA HERRON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CR-353-2-J

- - - - - - - - - - August 18, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant Belinda Herron appeals her sentence for accessory fact to bank robbery. She argues that the district court erred in enhancing her base offense level by two points pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(6)(C), because the money stolen from the bank was not in excess of $50,000. Herron has waived her right to appeal her sentence on the ground raised. See United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994). DISMISSED.
Before the Second Division,

August 4, 1943

No. 48613.

#### Protest 44639-K of T. A. Desmond & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items in question are similar to those involved in Abstract 46498. The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was therefore sustained.
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Certification by the Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ChinaCache International Holdings, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jennifer Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: April 21,   2011      |                  |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                             |                  |
| By:                              | /s/ Robert Yong   Sha |   |
| Name: Robert Yong   Sha          |                  |
| Title: Chief   Financial Officer |                  |
|                                  |                       |  |

 

1

----
# C_2007190EN.01000101.xml

| 15.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 August 2007

(2007/C 190/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3591 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 160,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4422 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6788 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,315 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6421 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,31 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,975 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,978 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,41 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6991 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7897 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2021 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,502 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7752 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6184 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4352 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6306 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8571 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0673 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 267,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8424 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2965 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3068 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 714,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7276 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,247 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,721 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,079 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3591

JPY

Japanese yen

160,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4422

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6788

SEK

Swedish krona

9,315

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6421

ISK

Iceland króna

89,31

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,975

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,978

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,41

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6991

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7897

RON

Romanian leu

3,2021

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,502

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7752

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6184

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4352

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6306

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8571

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0673

KRW

South Korean won

1 267,22

ZAR

South African rand

9,8424

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2965

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3068

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 714,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7276

PHP

Philippine peso

62,247

RUB

Russian rouble

34,721

THB

Thai baht

43,079

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
(Reap. Dec. 8206)

#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 734192.

(Decided March 5, 1953)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Fobd, Judge:

The appeal listed above has been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the merchandise marked “A” on the invoice and initialed J. M.:

> * * * consists of laces exported from France, and appraised at values which included the so-called production or unique tax (also known as the French Fiscal Reform Law tax) in the amounts as shown by the invoices and accompanying •certificate of pending reappraisement.

> (2) That said merchandise marked “A” is such or similar to merchandise which, when sold or offered for sale in France for exportation to the United States in the ordinary course of trade to all purchasers, and in the usual wholesale quantities, was sold or offered at the appraised values herein, less the French Fiscal Reform Tax (Production or Unique Tax) ais'added'on entry, packed.

> (3) That merchandise such as or similar to the imported merchandise marked “A”, when sold or offered for sale at the time of exportation, in France for home consumption, or for exportation to countries other than the United States, in ■the ordinary course of trade to all purchasers and in the usual wholesale quantities, was sold or offered for sale at the appraised values herein, less the French Fiscal. Reform Tax (Production or Unique Tax) as referred to above in paragraph 1 .and as added by the importer on entry, plus 1.01 per cent Armament tax when mot included in the appraised value, packed, and that the export value was no ¡higher.

Accepting the above stipulation as a statement of fact, I find the proper foreign values of the involved merchandise to be the appraised *527values thereof, less the French fiscal reform tax (production of unique tax) added by the importer on entry, plus 1.01 per centum armament tax, when not included in the appraised value, packed; Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7291

CLIFTON DONELL LYLES
,
Petitioner

- Appellant
,

v.

WARDEN CECILIA REYNOLDS
, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 4:14

- cv

- 01063

- TMC )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022

Before WILKINSON
, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Clifton Donell Lyles , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7291 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Clifton Donell Lyles appeals the district court ’s order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b) motion for relief from judgment as an unauthorized, successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254
petition and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. * Our review of the record confirms that
the district court properly constru ed Lyles’ Rule 60(b) motion as a successive § 225 4
petition over which it lacked jurisdiction because his failed to obtain prefiling authorization

from this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); McRae , 793 F.3d at 397

- 400.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

Consistent with our decision in United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th
Cir. 2003), we construe Lyles ’ notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file

a s econd or successive § 2254 petition. Upon review, we conclude that Lyles ’ claims do

not meet the relevant standard. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2). We therefore deny

authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* A certificate of appealability is not required to appeal the district court’s jurisdictional categorization of a Rule 60(b) motion as an unauthorized
, successive habeas petition. United States v. McRae , 793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015). USCA4 Appeal: 21-7291 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

March 17, 1944

No. 49270.

#### Protests 95779-K, etc., of National Adhesives Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case: 2:11-cr-00173-ALM-EPD Doc #: 162 Filed: 11/04/16 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cr-00173-ALM-EPD Doc #: 162 Filed: 11/04/16 Page: 2 of 7 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cr-00173-ALM-EPD Doc #: 162 Filed: 11/04/16 Page: 3 of 7 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cr-00173-ALM-EPD Doc #: 162 Filed: 11/04/16 Page: 4 of 7 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cr-00173-ALM-EPD Doc #: 162 Filed: 11/04/16 Page: 5 of 7 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cr-00173-ALM-EPD Doc #: 162 Filed: 11/04/16 Page: 6 of 7 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:11-cr-00173-ALM-EPD Doc #: 162 Filed: 11/04/16 Page: 7 of 7 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The Seasons of children's lives should be safe, spring is a time for growth

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The Seasons of children's lives should be safe, spring is a time for growth 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Defense 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  139 × 26 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  026326349.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM CO. v. ROBISON, Adm’x.

No. 22782.

Opinion Filed Feb. 2, 1932.

Blakeney' & Ambrister, for plaintiff in error.

T. G-. Chambers, Jr., Ben C. Arnold, and Tom Oheatwood, for defendant in error.

LESTER, C. J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county. The parties herein have signed and filed the following stipulation and confession of error:

> “Come now the Magnolia Petroleum Company, plaintiff in error, and Lucie Robison, administratrix of the estate of Robert R. Robison, deceased, and by and through her attorneys, T. G. Chambers, Jr., and Ben Arnold, -and show to this court that the above-entitled cause was filed herein -and is now pending in this court, and that among other things the -plaintiff in error asks that this court reverse the action of the trial court and grant a new trial, among other assignments of error as follows:

> “(1) The said -court erred in overruling motion for new trial filed by plaintiff in error.

> “(2) The verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

> “The defendant in error, by and through its attorneys herein, confesses that there was error in the action of the trial court in overruling the motion for new trial fjled by the xolaintiff in error for the reason that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and hereby agrees that this court may enter an order herein reversing the action of the trial court upon the grounds and for the reasons that the verdict of the jury and the judgment rendered thereon is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

> “The parties hereto agree that upon confession of error the action of the trial court may be reversed and the cause returned to the trial court for further action.

> “Dated this 28th day of January, 1932.”

Where counsel file in this court a confession of error, the court may in its discretion remand said cause by reason of said confession of error where it does not appear an injustice may be done.

An examination of the record in this case does not disclose that any harm may result by reason of remanding said cause for a new trial; and the court, therefore, reverses the judgment of the district court, with directions to vacate its former judgment and grant a new trial.

-CLARK, V. O. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, MCNEILL, and KORNEGAX, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 879 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 879

 To require the Secretary of the Interior to remove the Andrew Jackson 
statue and marble base in Lafayette Square in the District of Columbia, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2023

Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Carson, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. Clarke of New 
 York, Mr. Gomez, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Carter of Louisiana, Mr. Davis of 
  Illinois, and Ms. Lee of California) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Interior to remove the Andrew Jackson 
statue and marble base in Lafayette Square in the District of Columbia, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Andrew Jackson Statue Removal Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF ANDREW JACKSON STATUE.

    (a) Removal.--The Secretary of the Interior shall remove the Andrew 
Jackson statue and marble base from Lafayette Square in the District of 
Columbia.
    (b) Donation.--The Secretary shall donate the Andrew Jackson statue 
and marble base to a museum or other similar entity. The recipient of 
the statue and base may not store, display, or exhibit the statue 
outside. If the statue is stored, displayed, or exhibited outside, 
ownership of the statue and marble base will revert back to the Federal 
Government.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2007247EN.01002702.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/27

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2007 — Neumann v OHIM (Form of a microphone head grill)

(Case T-358/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark in the form of a microphone head grill - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2007/C 247/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Georg Neumann GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: R. Böhm, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 June 2004 (Case R 919/2002-2) refusing to register, as a Community trade mark, a three-dimensional sign in the form of a microphone head grill.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Georg Neumann GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Georg Neumann GmbH to pay the costs.

Orders Georg Neumann GmbH to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

Registrant (Commission File Number 333-110029):

Broder Bros., Co.

Six Neshaminy Interplex, 6thFloor

Trevose, Pennsylvania 19053

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Broder Bros., Co. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Myers, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broder Bros., Co.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 13, 2007



BRODER BROS., CO.By:

/s/ THOMAS MYERSThomas Myers Chief Executive Officer
No. 48626.

#### Protests 721389-G (F), etc., of Otto Roth & Co., Inc. (New York).

*234Opinion by

Keefe, J.

As to certain cheese stipulated to be similar to that involved in *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146 it was held that an allowance of 21⁄2 percent in the net weight should have been made, as claimed. As to cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra,*the claim for an allowance of 1 percent of the net weight was sustained. Following *Kraft-Phenix Cheese Corp. v. United States*(T. D. 47955) it was held that an allowance for weight of paper or foil, or both, should have been made by the collector in the net weight used in computing the duty on certain other cheese.
No. 53680.

protest 138862-K (New York).

#### Transatlantic Import Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9057 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make extend the delimiting date 

for certain benefits for surviving spouses of Persian Gulf War veterans 

under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2024 

Mr. PAPPAS (for himself and Mr. YAKYM) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make extend 

the delimiting date for certain benefits for surviving 

spouses of Persian Gulf War veterans under the laws 

administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gulf War Survivor 

5 Benefits Update Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9057 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF2 FAIRS DELIMITING DATE FOR CERTAIN BEN3 EFITS FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES OF PERSIAN 

4 GULF WAR VETERANS. 

5 Section 1541(f)(1)(E) of title 38, United States 

6 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2001’’ and in7 serting ‘‘the date that is ten years and one day after the 

8 date of the termination of the Persian Gulf War, as pre9 scribed by Presidential proclamation or law,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Before the First Division,

August 26, 1942

No. 47477.

#### Protests 957908-G, etc., of Young’s Market Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The merchandise herein consisted of certain glass containers used for the holding and transportation of whisky. They were entered under a special permit requiring no indicia to be blown into the containers, the bottles being of equal value to the whisky contained therein. In view of the stipulation of fact filed herein it was held that they are properly dutiable as claimed at 20 percent under paragraph 218 (f) and the associated paragraph 810.
ARS HomeOffice of CommunicationsFNRB

----

Related Links
- Human Nutrition Research
- Nutrient Data tools 
- Food Composition and Nutrition Links
- BHNRC Seminar Series

A compilation of ARS news on food and nutrition, issued twice a year.