alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### HectorVillegas Aguirre, Plaintiff,


### v. United States ofAmerica, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### Civil Action No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED MAY 1 92009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts 

# 09 0922

The plaintiffis a prisoner who has filed apro se complaint and an application to proceed informapauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint dismissed for lack of subject matterjurisdiction. Plaintiffhas filed a civil action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 

### §§ 1346(b), 2671 etseq. A civil action may be not be instituted under that Act unless the claimant shall have first presented the claim to the appropriate federal agency and his claim shall have been finally denied by the agency in writing and sent by certified or registered mail. The failure ofan agency to make a final disposition ofa claim within six months after it is filed shall, at the option ofthe claimant any time thereafter, be deemed a final denial ofthe claim for purposes of this section. 28 U.S.C. 

### § 2675(a). This court does not have subject matterjurisdiction over FTCA claims that have not been administratively exhausted as required by 

### § 2675(a). See Jackson v. UnitedStates, 730 F.2d 808, 809 (D.C. Cir. 1984) ("Such a[n administrative] claim is a mandatory jurisdictional prerequisite to a[n FTCA] suit against the United States."). Plaintiffhas not demonstrated that he has exhausted his administrative remedies. Because plaintiffhas not

### established that this court has subject matterjurisdiction over this action, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. A 

### separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

Date:

# "l1Ir2rd1

# fA~- District Judge

- 2 -
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00193]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2012-0088]

Notice of Establishment of an Animal and Plant Health Inspection 
Service Stakeholder Registry

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of a new Animal and 
Plant Health Inspection Service stakeholder registry.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Hallie Zimmers, Advisor for State 
and Stakeholder Relations, Legislative and Public Affairs, APHIS, room 
1147, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250; (202) 799-
7029.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Animal and Plant Health Inspection 
Service (APHIS) has established an electronic stakeholder registry for 
individuals and organizations interested in receiving updates regarding 
APHIS announcements, activities, policies, regulations and services. 
Subscribers can choose from an array of topics covering all of APHIS' 
program areas and once registered will receive information via email or 
text tailored to their specific interests. In addition to choosing 
topics of interest, subscribers may select how often they want to 
receive messages.
    APHIS' Plant Protection and Quarantine and Veterinary Services 
programs are already using this subscription service to share 
information with stakeholders. By expanding the registry to include 
APHIS' Animal Care, Biotechnology Regulatory Services, International 
Services, and Wildlife Services programs, we are adopting an agency-
wide approach toward increasing transparency and communication with our 
many and diverse stakeholders.
    To join the registry and receive messages, stakeholders must 
subscribe and provide an email address or telephone number. 
Stakeholders can update their profiles at any time using this same 
information.
    Persons interested in becoming subscribers or updating their 
subscriptions may access the expanded registry at: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDAAPHIS/subscriber/topics?qsp=USDAAPHIS_1. Subscribers can also register or update their 
profiles by clicking on the red envelope on the APHIS home page at 
www.aphis.usda.gov. Questions concerning the APHIS stakeholder registry 
may be directed to the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of January, 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-00193 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-60177 

Conference Calendar

 

J. CARL WILSON,

GERALD GRUDZINSKAS,

and DEBRA GRUDZINSKAS;

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

J. TAYLOE SIMMONS, JR. ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:98-CV-125-WS

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

J. Carl Wilson, Gerald Grudzinskas, and Debra Grudzinskas, 

appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil lawsuit. 

The district court dismissed based on lack of jurisdiction. The

appellants have not identified any error on the part of the

district court. They have failed to brief whether the district

court erred in dismissing their appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

The appellants have presented nothing for this court to review. 
No. 98-60177

-2-

Their appeal is frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See

Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744,

748 (5th Cir. 1987); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We warn the appellants

that additional frivolous appeals filed by them or on their 

behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, the appellants are cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous. Finally, the appellants’ motion to consolidate the

cause of action on appeal with a separate bankruptcy action is

DENIED.

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
# C_2007244EN.01001201.xml

| 18.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/12

---

Recruitment notice PE/95/S

(2007/C 244/05)

The European Parliament is organising the following selection procedure:

| | PE/95/S — Temporary staff — Administrators (AD9) — Doctor |
| --- | --- |

PE/95/S — Temporary staff — Administrators (AD9) — Doctor

PE/95/S

This selection procedure requires a level of education which corresponds to completed university studies attested by a diploma conferring a licence to practise general medicine, recognised in at least one of the EU's Member States.

By the closing date for applications candidates must, after obtaining the qualifications mentioned above, have acquired at least five years' experience in a field relevant to the job description. This experience must have been acquired in the six years preceding the closing date for applications.

This recruitment notice is published only in English, French and German. The full text is in Official Journal C 244 A in the three languages.

---
# C_2007199EN.01001402.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/14

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2007 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Asturias (Spain)) — José Manuel Blanco Pérez, María del Pilar Chao Gómez v Consejería de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios, Federación Empresarial de Farmacéuticos (FEFE), Principado de Asturias

(Joined Cases C-72/07 and C-111/07) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Inadmissibility)

(2007/C 199/24)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Asturias (Spain)

Parties

Applicants: José Manuel Blanco Pérez, María del Pilar Chao Gómez

Applicants:

Defendants: Consejería de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios, Federación Empresarial de Farmacéuticos (FEFE), Principado de Asturias

Defendants:

Re:

Reference for preliminary ruling — Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Asturias — Interpretation of Article 43 EC — Regulations laying down conditions required to open new pharmacies

Operative part of the order

The references for preliminary rulings made by the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Asturias, by decisions of 30 November 2006 and 29 January 2007, are manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 14.4.2007.

1

OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.

---
. Tel (00.54.11) 4121-5261 e-mail: oece@senasa.gov.ar http://www.senasa.gov.ar

 Pierna Carne Carne Paleta Bife Cuarto Recortes Asado Otros(as)

Or- País TOTAL Lanas Carcazas o Muslo s/Hueso c/Hueso [Corte] Angosto Delantero Garrón de Troceo (Corte) 16(2)

den TOTAL: 27,969 Parc Acum 22,019 2,919 620 454 363 307 226 210 138 116 92 502

1 China 9,343 33 33 9,343 - - - - - - - - - - -

2 Uruguay 3,181 11 45 3,181 - - - - - - - - - - -

3 México 3,082 11 56 3,082 - - - - - - - - - - -

4 España 1,901 7 63 173 1,125 152 99 30 122 87 - 18 13 - 82

5 Turquía 1,480 5 68 1,480 - - - - - - - - - - -

6 Perú 1,340 5 73 1,340 - - - - - - - - - - -

7 Gran Bretaña 919 3 76 - 350 81 129 48 53 42 16 44 40 48 68

8 Portugal 616 2 78 - 609 7 - - - - - - - - -

9 Bulgaria 595 2 80 521 74 - - - - - - - - - -

10 Alemania 540 2 82 372 9 43 43 - 19 27 - 15 - - 12

11 Bélgica 525 2 84 13 - 130 7 - 82 43 - 35 19 28 168

12 Colombia 500 2 86 500 - - - - - - - - - - -

13 Brasil 500 2 88 261 1 11 61 71 15 3 10 2 43 12 10

14 Chile 449 2 89 449 - - - - - - - - - - -

15 Bolivia 376 1 91 376 - - - - - - - - - - -

16 India 286 1 92 286 - - - - - - - - - - -

17 Francia 273 1 93 26 92 56 12 - 8 18 - 24 - 4 33

18 Italia 254 1 94 110 136 - 8 - - - - - - - -

19 Israel 212 1 94 - 43 - - - - - 164 - - - 5

20 Arabia Saudi 174 1 95 - 51 - - 123 - - - - - - -

 Otros(as) 28 (3) 1,423 5 100 508 428 139 97 91 8 6 20 0 2 - 124

Exportaciones - 2008 - Ovinos - País por Producto en TON (1)

(1) Apertura OAEPD. Datos al 31/12/08. Incluye únicamente los volúmenes de los productos fiscalizados por la DTI/DNPV, expresados en Toneladas Peso Producto

(2) Cogote; Asado c/Vacío/Matamb; Costillar; Cuadril; Bife Ancho; Lomo; Carcazas o 1/2 Carca; Vacío; Lengua; Brazuelo; Cuarto Trasero; Entraña; Carré; Bife de Paleta; 

Bondiola (Corte) y Solomillo.

(3) Holanda; Ecuador; Curaçao; Hong Kong; Suecia; Estados Unidos; St. Maarten; Túnez; Canadá; Palestina; Qatar; Venezuela; Marruecos; Libia; Aruba; Guadalupe; Ulster 

(Irlanda Nort; Australia; Suiza; Angola; Malasia; Eire (Irlanda del Su; Costa de Marfil; Rusia; Indonesia; Líbano; Senegal y Chipre.

 

%

Senasa - DNFA - Coordinación de Estadísticas - Oficina de Estadísticas de Comercio Exterior

Página 1 de 1
Tel (00.54.11) 4331-6041 al 6048 int. 1511 / Fax 4334-5218 e-mail: oece@data54.com http://www.senasa.gov.ar

Senasa - CCFyC - Oficina de Estadísticas de Comercio Exterior Página 1 de 2
Tel (00.54.11) 4331-6041 al 6048 int. 1511 / Fax 4334-5218 e-mail: oece@data54.com http://www.senasa.gov.ar

Senasa - CCFyC - Oficina de Estadísticas de Comercio Exterior Página 2 de 2
Tel (00.54.11) 4331-6041 al 6048 int. 1511 / Fax 4334-5218 e-mail: oece@data54.com http://www.senasa.gov.ar

Senasa - CCFyC - Oficina de Estadísticas de Comercio Exterior Página 1 de 2
Tel (00.54.11) 4331-6041 al 6048 int. 1511 / Fax 4334-5218 e-mail: oece@data54.com http://www.senasa.gov.ar

Senasa - CCFyC - Oficina de Estadísticas de Comercio Exterior Página 2 de 2
No. 49793.

#### Protest 84785-K 12570 of Norman G. Jensen (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The evidence showed that the merchandise was produced by taking sawn cedar lumber and running it through a molding machine, which operates with knives in a manner similar to a- planing machine, and that the process is akin to that which produces ceiling material or tonguing and grooving. The sample consists of a strip of wood *4%*inches wide and % of an inch thick *at*its thickest part, having a rabbet )4 inch deep and 1 inch in width cut on one side, and another *%e*by 1)4 inches cut on the same side from the other-edge, the inside of this latter rabbet being beveled, and having one edge nosed' *304and the other square. It was clear from the record that the merchandise as imported is not dedicated to any particular use or class of uses, but used for a variety of purposes, and that in any case numerous operations, such as sanding, cutting, assembling, etc., must be performed before a finished article is produced from the material. The court was satisfied that the merchandise at bar was produced by an operation which was, in effect, a species of planing. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry and the tax at $1.50 per thousand feet, board measure, was sustained on the authority of *United States*v. *Myers (5*Ct. Cust. Appls. 541, T. D. 35179).
Exhibit 10.13


 


MAC-GRAY CORPORATION


2008 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
ARRANGEMENTS


 


The
following summarizes the compensation arrangements established between Mac-Gray
Corporation (the “Company”) and its directors to be effective as of July 1,
2008:


 


Directors
who are also employees of the Company do not receive compensation for their
services on the Board or any committee thereof. 
Each director who is not an employee of the Company receives:


 


·                  An
annual fee of $30,000, paid in quarterly installments, 50% of which is paid in
shares of common stock and the balance of which, at the discretion of the
director, is paid in cash, shares of common stock or any combination thereof;
and


·                  An
additional fee of $1,600 for each Board meeting attended in person and $500 per
meeting attended by teleconference.


 


Committee
members receive $1,600 per meeting of the Compensation Committee or the Audit
Committee, and $1,300 per meeting of the Governance and Nominating
Committee.  Committee members receive
$300 per meeting attended by teleconference. 
In addition, the Chairman of each of the Compensation Committee and the
Audit Committee is paid $8,000 per year, and the Chairman of the Governance and
Nominating Committee receives $5,500 per year.


 


Each
newly elected non-employee director receives an option to purchase 5,000 shares
of common stock on the fifth business day after his or her election to the
Board, and each non-employee director who is serving as a director on the fifth
business day after each annual meeting of stockholders automatically receives
an option to purchase 7,500 shares of common stock valued at $60,000.  All of such options granted to non-employee
directors are fully exercisable upon grant at an exercise price equal to the fair
market value of the common stock on the date of the grant and terminate upon
the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. 
All directors are reimbursed for significant travel expenses, if any,
incurred in attending meetings of the Board and its committees.
Exhibit 31.1





Certifications











I, Ryan C. Farris, certify that:





1I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Master Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and U.S. Bank Trust National Association.





Date: March 29, 2016





/s/ Ryan C. Farris





Ryan C. Farris


President, Ally Wholesale Enterprises LLC, as Depositor


(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)





























1
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-2394

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

WALDEMAR BURGOS-CHAPARRO,

Defendant, Appellant.

The opinion of this court issued October 23, 2002, should be

amended as follows:

On page 7, line 5, replace the word "assumes" with the word

"requires."
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16766-16767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6405]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A- 570-847]


Polyvinyl Alcohol from the People's Republic of China: Notice of 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD 
Operations, Import Administration, Room 1870, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6412.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 2, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review 
of the antidumping duty order on polyvinyl alcohol (``PVA'') from the 
People's Republic of China (``PRC''). See Antidumping or Countervailing 
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation: Opportunity to Request 
Administrative Review, 71 FR 57920 (October 2, 2006). On October 23, 
2006, Sinopec Sichuan Vinylon Works (``SVW'') requested that the 
Department conduct an administrative review of SVW. The Department 
published a notice of initiation of the antidumping duty administrative 
review of PVA from the PRC for the period October 1, 2005, through 
September 30, 2006. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 71 FR 
68535 (November 27, 2006).

Rescission of Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested 
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. On 
January 18, 2007, SVW withdrew its request for an administrative review 
within 90 days of the publication of the notice of initiation of this 
review. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), and 
consistent with its practice, the Department hereby rescinds the 
administrative review of Polyvinyl Alcohol from the People's Republic 
of China for the period October 1, 2005,

[[Page 16767]]

through September 30, 2006. The Department intends to issue assessment 
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection 15 days after the 
publication of this notice of rescission of administrative review.
    This notice is in accordance with section 777(i) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: March 23, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-6405 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Exhibit 12.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MakeMyTrip Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15(d)-15(f)) for the company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
Audit Committee of the companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Deep KalraName:
    Deep KalraTitle:
    Group Chief Executive Officer