alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v HENDRICK R. HUDSON, Jr., Airman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant

17 USCMA 383, 38 CMR 181

No. 20,773

February 2, 1968

*Lieutenant J. Arthur Bruno,*USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel C. R. Larouche,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Tried by special court-martial and found guilty of willful disobedience of a lawful order, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 90, 10 USC § 890, the accused was sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of $64.60 per month for six months, confinement at hard labor for six months, and reduction. Intermediate appellate authorities have approved the sentence, although the bad-conduct discharge has been suspended.

Evidence of accused’s prior, unblemished record and other matters were presented in mitigation and extenuation. Nevertheless, the president’s instructions on punishment were limited to the maximum sentence and additional *pro forma*advice. This was error and, under the circumstances, prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused. See United States v Wheeler, 17 USCMA 274, 38 CMR 72, and United States v Mabry, 17 USCMA 285, 38 CMR 83.

The decision of the board of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The board may reassess the sentence, or order a rehearing thereon.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6678]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-53-000]


FirstEnergy Generation Corp.; Notice of Filing

April 4, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 2, 2007, FirstEnergy Generation Corp. 
submitted a petition requesting the Commission to disclaim jurisdiction 
over passive owner participants associated with a proposed sale and 
leaseback of existing generation.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e787b6c7d71505257505b6d4b4e4e514c4a7e585b4c5d10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="15535047565a7b797c7b70466065657a676155737067763b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 20, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6678 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Capacitor Sta rt Resilient Base Motors

1 0 www.aosmithmotors.com

Features

• Class “B” Insulation • Reversible • 2, 4 and 6 Pole

• High Start Torque • Sleeve & Ball Bearing • 40° C Ambient

• Open Construction • 60 HZ

F.L. Stock Pro- A p p r o x . Dim. Conn.

HP RPM Volts Amps S.F. Frame Number Alternate Bearings tector “C” “AG” Enclosure Dia. Notes

1⁄4 1725 115/230 5.0/2.5 1.35 48 RS1024A Sleeve Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 38

1⁄3 3450 115/230 5.6/2.8 1.8 48 BF1032 Ball Auto 10.2 8.3 Open 22 5,6,7,8

1725 115/230 5.6/2.8 1.35 48 RBF1034A Ball Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 38 10

115/230 7.0/3.5 1.00 48 RS1030A Sleeve Auto 9.4 7.5 Open 38

115/230 5.6/2.8 1.35 48 RS1035A Sleeve Auto 9.9 8.0 Open 38

115/230 5.6/2.8 1.35 48Z RS1034A Sleeve Auto 9.8 7.6 Open 38 2

115/230 5.6/2.8 1.35 56 RB1034A C403 Ball Auto 9.8 7.6 Open 38

1⁄2 3450 115/230 6.2/3.1 1 25 48 RBF1052A B590 Ball Auto 10.4 8.5 Open 38 10

115/230 7.4/3.7 1.25 48 RS1052A RB1052A Sleeve Auto 10.4 8.5 Open 38 10

115/230 8.8/4.4 1.25 56 RB1052A Ball Auto 10.4 8.2 Open 38

115/208-230 7.2/3.6 1.6 48 BF1052 Ball Auto 10.5 8.6 Open 22 5,6,7,8

115/208-230 7.2/3.6 1.6 56 BK1052 Ball Auto 10.9 8.7 Open 22 5,6,7,8

1725 115/230 8.6/4.3 1.00 48 RS1050A Sleeve Auto 10.3 8.4 Open 38

115/230 8.6/4.3 1.00 56 RS1051A Sleeve Auto 10.3 8.1 Open 38

115/230 8.8/4.4 1.25 56 RS1054 C634 Sleeve None 10.8 8.6 Open 101 10

115/230 8.8/4.4 1.25 56 RS1054A Sleeve Auto 10.3 8.1 Open 38

115/230 8.8/4.4 1.25 56 RB1054 C634 Ball None 10.8 8.6 Open 101 10

115/230 8.8/4.4 1.25 56 RB1054A Ball Auto 10.8 8.6 Open 38

115/208-230 7.6/3.8 1.25 56 BK1054 Ball Auto 11.6 9.4 Open 22 5,6,7,8

1425 110/220 8.6/4.3 1.25 56 RS1055 Sleeve None 10.8 8.8 Open 101 9

Notes:

2.48Z = 5/8” dia x 2” shaft, with 3” height

5. Sealed switch design

6. Start capacitor inside

7. Terminal board

8. Moderate start torque

9. 50 HZ

10. Item to be discontinued when stock is depleted

See page 117 for mounting dimensions

Shaft Dimensions

48 = 1/2” Flat x 1-5/8”

56 = 5/8” Keyed x 1-7/8”

Continued on next page

BK1054 RB1054A

Features: Class “B” Insulation • High Start Torque 

• Open Construction • Reversible • Sleeve & Ball Bearing 

• 2, 4 and 6 Pole• 40° C Ambient • 60 HZ • Volts at 1.0 S.F

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 30
(Reap. Dec. 9293)

#### Pan American Trade Development Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 5962.

(Decided January 15, 1959)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement was submitted for decision by counsel for the parties upon a stipulation reading, so far as pertinent, as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above named appeal for reappraisement consists of birch plywood exported from Finland after May 20, 1955.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market values or the prices at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of Finland, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values less 4% and that there was no higher export value.

On the agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis of value for the merchandise, and that the said value in each instance was the appraised value, less 4 per centum.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2019 p0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2019

157996

APEX LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL

INC.,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 157996

COA: 338218

MTT: 16-000724-TT

CITY OF DETROIT,

Respondent-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of February 4, 2019, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Henderson v Civil Serv Comm (Docket No. 156270). On order of the Court, the case 

having been decided on March 15, 2019, ___ Mich ___ (2019), the application is again 

considered, and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court 

of Appeals for reconsideration in light of S Dakota v Wayfair, Inc, ___US ___; 138 S Ct 

2080, 2099; 201 L Ed 2d 403 (2018), which overruled Quill Corp v North Dakota ex rel 

Heitkamp, 504 US 298; 112 S Ct 1904; 119 L Ed 2d 91 (1992).

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2010-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName: Jason KulasTitle: President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 28, 2014
No. 47492.

#### Protest 843728-G of Dan Brechner & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the rubber balloons in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 40493, which balloons were trimmed with colored feathers fastened to one end of a hollow cane or stick. In accordance therewith the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 409 as manufactures of bamboo was sustained.
Exhibit 99.7





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Extorre Gold Mines Limited (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darcy Daubaras, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




March 28, 2011
/s/ Darcy DaubarasDarcy DaubarasChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
ex10_1-7.htm


     

     

    Exhibit
10.1.7

     

    


     

    June 27,
2008

     

    


    
      	
              Steven
      Helmers, Esq.

            	
              Christopher
      Reitz, Esq.

            
	
              Black
      Hills Corporation

            	
              Aquila,
      Inc.

            
	
              625
      Ninth Street

            	
              20
      West Ninth Street

            
	
              Rapid
      City, SD 57709

            	
              Kansas
      City, MO 64105

            


    

     

    


    
      	
              Re:

            	
              Partnership
      Interests Purchase Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreement (collectively,
      the "Agreements") by and among Aquila, Inc. ("Aquila"), Black Hills
      Corporation ("Black Hills"), Great Plains Energy Incorporated ("Great
      Plains") and Gregory Acquisition Corp.
  ("Gregory")

            


    

     

    Dear
Steve and Chris:

     

    Under the
terms of the Agreements, as modified by those certain letters dated as of June
29, 2007, August 31, 2007, September 28, 2007, November 30, 2007, January 30,
2008, February 28, 2008, March 28, 2008, April 28, 2008, May 29, 2008, and June
19, 2008, Black Hills, Aquila and Great Plains are to attach schedules setting
forth Retained Agreements and Shared Agreements prior to June 27,
2008.  We recognize that this deadline may be implausible and
therefore propose extending the date set forth under section 2.2(1) and 8.5(d)
of the Agreements to July 3, 2008.

    


    If you
are in agreement, please sign below on the attached signature page where
indicated and return a copy of this letter to me by fax or e-mail.

    


    


    
      	 
      	
              Very
      truly yours,

              Great
      Plains Energy Incorporated

            
	 
      	
               

              By:
      /s/ Mark G. English

              Name:
      Mark G. English

              Title:
      General Counsel

            


    

    
 

    
      
        

      



    


    ACKNOWLEDGED,
CONSENTED TO, AND ACCEPTED BY:

    


    BLACK
HILLS CORPORATION

    


    


    By:  /s/
Steven J. Helmers

    


    Name:  Steven
J. Helmers

    Title:    Sr.
Vice President and General Counsel

    


    


    AQUILA,
INC.

    


    


    By:  /s/
Chris Reitz

    


    Name:  Chris
Reitz

    Title:    General
Counsel

    


    


    GREGORY
ACQUISITION CORP.

    


    


    By:  /s/
Mark G. English

    


    Name:  Mark
G. English

    Title:    Secretary
and Treasurer
# C_2007185EN.01000502.xml

| 8.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4782 — Delek/Texaco Benelux)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 185/04)

On 1 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4782. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4782. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION OF C.F.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Patrick Yore, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:  1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Big Clix Corp.;  2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.          The small business issuers sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.          The small business issuers sole officer, I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: September 21, 2011  /s/ Patrick Yore Patrick Yore Chief Financial Officer
Case No. 6,836.

#### HUDSON COAL CO. v. The MINNIE R. CHILDS.

[1 N. J. Law J. 42.]

District. Court, D. New Jersey.

Jan. 22, 1878.

Maritime Lien’s — Enforcement—Amendment of Libei, — Conditions Imposed.

[After condemnation under a libel to enforce a general admiralty lien for supplies, it appeared that the residence of the owner was at the port where the supplies were furnished, .and libelant asked leave to amend so as to ■claim a lien under the local statutes. *Edd*that, where other parties had come in to assert liens, the amendment would only be allowed up■on condition that libelant should be entitled only ■to the balance left after the other claims were •paid.]

[This was a libel in rem by the Hudson ■Coal Company against the Minnie R. Childs ■to enforce an alleged lien for stores and supplies. Heard on application for leave to .amend the libel.]

The proceedings against the steamer were for stores and supplies furnished to her at Hoboken, and the libel filed assumed that her home was the port of New York. After ■the condemnation, (no one appearing on the return of the monition,) it came out upon an examination, that the owner was a resident •of Hoboken, and there, at her home port, the vessel had received the stores, etc.; and hence there was no general maritime lien for the claim, and the libel did not allege any lien under the local laws of New7 Jersey. Leave was given to the libellants to apply to the court for an amendment of the libel, on notice to all parties in interest. The steamer having been sold, and other claimants having come in to participate in the proceeds of sale, objections were urged that there was not sufficient fund to pay all the liens, and that its allowance would in fact give the libellants a preference over the others, and that, the equities of all parties being equal, the libellants ought not to be put in a superior position.

M. W. Niven, for Hudson Coal Co. Muir-heid & McGee, for other libellants.

NIXON, District Judge.

There is certainly force in the objection; and especially in view7 of the fact that it appears from sundry payments made by the owner to the libel-lants and from the evidente that the libel-lants knew the residence of the owner when the libel was filed, and were presumed to know that they had no general maritime lien for their demand. Under the 24th admiralty rule the court has ample power to impose terms when amendments, in matters of substance, are asked for, and I think it proper to impose terms in this case. The libellants are allowed to amend the libel by inserting an allegation that they have a lien upon the vessel for the stores and supplies by virtue ■ of the local laws of the state of New Jersey, and that the libel be filed to enforce the same; but upon the conditions, nevertheless, that they shall receive nothing out of the fund, under their amended libel, until the other lien creditors, whose claims have been allowed, have been paid. I have imposed these terms to avoid a precedent, although they are nominal in this case, as there are sufficient funds in the registry, I believe to pay all the claims, including the libellants’, in full.
No. 56558.

protests 990374-G, etc. (Seattle).

#### B. R. Anderson & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.