alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007211EN.01002501.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance, Paris, lodged on 6 July 2007 — JVC France SAS v Administration des douanes (Direction Nationale du Renseignement et des Enquêtes douanières)

(Case C-312/07)

(2007/C 211/46)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal d'instance de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: JVC France SAS

Applicant:

Defendant: Administration des douanes (Direction Nationale du Renseignement et des Enquêtes douanières)

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Must a camcorder, which when imported is unable to record external video signals, be classified under subheading 8525 40 99, if its video interface can subsequently be reconfigured as a video input by using software or an enabler (widget) equipped with electronic circuitry which enables it to record an external video sound signal, even though the manufacturer and the seller have not mentioned this possibility and do not endorse it? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must a camcorder, which when imported is unable to record external video signals, be classified under subheading 8525 40 99, if its video interface can subsequently be reconfigured as a video input by using software or an enabler (widget) equipped with electronic circuitry which enables it to record an external video sound signal, even though the manufacturer and the seller have not mentioned this possibility and do not endorse it?

| 2. | If so, to the extent that the subsequent amendments of the explanatory notes entail a change in Community practice with regard to the classification of camcorders and an exception to the principle that goods must be classified according to their actual characteristics at the time of customs clearance, was the European Commission entitled to make this change by amending the explanatory notes, and hence with retrospective effect, rather than by adopting a classification regulation that was applicable only in the future? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, to the extent that the subsequent amendments of the explanatory notes entail a change in Community practice with regard to the classification of camcorders and an exception to the principle that goods must be classified according to their actual characteristics at the time of customs clearance, was the European Commission entitled to make this change by amending the explanatory notes, and hence with retrospective effect, rather than by adopting a classification regulation that was applicable only in the future?

---
Before the First Division,

April 22, 1952

No. 56570.

protest 123739-K (New York).

#### Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, *J.*

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
 ExamWorks Group, Inc:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-170487) on Form S-8 of ExamWorks Group, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2011, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of ExamWorks Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 and related financial statement schedule and our report dated October 12, 2010, relating to the statements of operations and cash flows from January 1, 2008 to July 13, 2008 of CFO Medical Services, P.A. (Predecessor Company) which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of ExamWorks Group, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia


March 11, 2011
July 30, 2015

Mr. Kyle Falwell

Central Virginia Aerial Solutions, LLC

4132 Richmond Highway

Lynchburg, VA 24501

Dear Mr. Falwell:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 12, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1450), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:   (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/   Roy T. K. Thung
Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: August 11, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   1
No. 43018.

#### Protests 718695-G, etc., of R. Alexander et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

D allin gee, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Second Division,

November 10, 1944

No. 49795.

#### Protest 52288-K/90122 of Stern, McGivney *&*Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with agreement of counsel and *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), certain hats of hemp, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained were held dutiable at 25 percent as claimed.
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of BrasilAgro—Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Julio Cesar de Toledo Piza Neto, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(i)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

October 30, 2015
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# America the beautiful: Maine

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  America the beautiful: Maine 
                    -           Alternative Title        
                    -  Conservation farming systems cross farm boundaries, Central Aroostook soil and conservation district 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Agriculture 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1960-1970 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  Maine 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  150 × 60 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  A57.8-2.M28.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

In connection with the quarterly report of DayStar Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher T. Lail, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

Date: August 23, 2010
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sub-Urban Brands, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Jack
      Mott, the Chief Financial Officer of Sub-Urban Brands, Inc., does hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section .1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company as of
      and
      for the periods covered by the Report.





Dated:
      November 20, 2006




/s/ Jack
              MottChief
              Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Each of the
undersigned officers of Tampa Electric Company (the Company) certifies, under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 9 2004  |  | /s/ S. W. HUDSON       
|                        |  | S. W. HUDSON           
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Dated: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ G. L. GILLETTE     
|                        |  | G. L. GILLETTE         
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Stockslager, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                        
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark J. Stockslager
|                   |  |     |  | Mark J. Stockslager    
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
|September 25, 2009 |  |     |  |
#### John B. Holmes v. Ione Walling Holmes, otherwise known as Ione Walling.

176 So. 754.

Division A.

Opinion Filed October 28, 1937.

*761*John H\ Mercer*and *Carter & Simms,*for Appellant;

*Robinson & Singeltary,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellee filed bill of complaint seeking divorce. On stipulation of counsel, original bill of complaint was withdrawn and substitute bill was filed which was allowed by order of court. The allegations of the substitute bill of complaint are sufficient to charge the defendant with extreme cruelty to complainant and with the indulgence of a violent and ungovernable temper.

Defendant filed answer as follows:

“The defendant, John B. Holmes, *in propria persona,*hereby expressly waiving the further issuance and service of process in the above entitled cause, for answer to the bill of complaint, says:

“That he admits the residence of the parties as alleged, the marriage to plaintiff on the 5th day of November, A. D. 1935, at Leesburg, Florida, and says that he has not lived or cohabited with the plaintiff since November 20, A. D. 1936.

“For lack of information, defendant neither admits nor denies the remaining allegations thereof, but demands strict proof of each material allegation not herein specifically admitted.

“And now having fully answered said bill of complaint, defendant waives all other and further service and notice in connection with the proceedings in said cause, and consents for the same to proceed to a final decree or other disposition by this Honorable Court as to the Court may seem proper in the premises.

“Wherefore, he prays to be hence discharged.”

Master was appointed, testimony taken, report of the Master filed and final decree entered.

*762All notice having been waived by defendant, süch waiver appearing as a part of the Answer, which he filed, the Court required no further notice to be served on him which, under the stated condition, was without error.

The Court acquired jurisdiction of the parties and the cause. The evidence establishes the truth of the allegations , of the bill of complaint and is sufficient to support the decree.

The decree should be, and is affirmed.

So ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. 'J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
No. 49314.

Suit 4456.

#### United *States*v. *United States Rubber Co.*

C. D. 779 affirmed February 7, 1944. C. A. .D. 269.
# C_2007258EN.01001001.xml

| 31.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/10

---

Recruitment notice PE/96/S

(2007/C 258/06)

The European Parliament is organising the following selection procedure: PE/96/S — Temporary member of staff — Assistant (AST4) — IT developer.

This selection procedure requires post-secondary education in the field of information technology, of at least two years, attested by a diploma

or

a level of secondary education attested by a diploma giving access to post-secondary education followed by professional experience of at least three years in a field relevant to the job description.

By the closing date for applications candidates must, after obtaining the qualifications mentioned, have acquired at least five years' experience in a field relevant to the job description.

This recruitment notice is published only in English, French and German. The full text is in Official Journal C 258 A in the three languages.

---
**** 

**Exhibit 4.25**

**** 

**Summary of the Private Instrument of Real Properties and Rural Assets Purchase and Sale Commitment and Other Covenants, entered into on January 11, 2017, in connection with Fazenda  São José**

**Parties**: Agro Pecuária e Industrial Serra Grande Ltda., as Seller; Imobiliária Ceibo Ltda., as Buyer, Brasilagro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedade Agrícolas, as Guarantor and Jaborandi Agricola Ltda. as Intervening-consenting party.

**Purpose**:  The purchase, by Jaborandi Agrícola Ltda., of an area of 17,565,7592 hectares (with an arable land of approximately 10,000 hectares). which was part of the real property registered under the enrollment certificate No. 3,106 and is currently registered under the enrollment certificate No. 6,886 of the Real Estate Registry Office of São Raimundo das Mangabeiras, State of Maranhão. Brasilagro shall pay R$100.0 million, whereby payment shall be made pursuant the following terms: (i) R$11.6 million is payable upon signature of the contract (ii) R$4.0 million is payable to Banco Rodobens three days after the Debt Clearance Certificate (*Certidão Negativa de Débitos*) is issued; and (iii) the residual amount is payable two days after the contract is registered at Real Estate Registry Office.  

The final public deed of the sale and purchase arising from this Commitment Instrument was on February 2, 2017 by the Notary Office of São Raimundo das Mangabeiras at pages 111/131, Act No. 01708, Book No. 23.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

BRYAN WALTERS, 

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D23-1411

LT Case No. 2020-CA-003058

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

/ 

Opinion filed July 3, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County, 

Michael S. Sharrit, Judge.

Bryan Walters, Jacksonville, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

EDWARDS, C.J., JAY and PRATT, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JOSEPH S. BAKER, Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

17 USCMA 346, 38 CMR 144

No. 20,695

December 22, 1967

*Lieutenant Peter F. Vaira,*USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Charles*Freeland, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States,

*347Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Tried by special court-martial, the accused pleaded guilty to a number of alleged violations of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 92, 10 USC § 892. Intermediate appellate authorities have affirmed, and he has petitioned for relief here upon the assertion that specification 2 of Charge I does not allege an offense.

The count in question purports to allege the accused failed to obey a lawful order, set forth as “Division Order 5050.4,” by being in an off-limits establishment in the village of Da Son, Vietnam. It, however, fails to state the essential element of knowledge. United States v Tinker, 10 USCMA 292, 27 CMR 366. The staff legal officer and board of review, Member Jones dissenting, opined that characterization of the order as a “Division” order was sufficient to imply the order was a “general” directive and, hence, to eliminate the requirement for allegation and proof of knowledge. See United States v Tinker, supra. We disagree, for it is obvious that divisions publish many kinds of orders, which may or may not be general in nature. Cf. United States v Fleig, 16 USCMA 444, 37 CMR 64. We find, therefore, that specification 2 of Charge I does not allege an offense.

In addition to the foregoing, an examination of the record discloses that, although the accused pleaded guilty to violation of another lawful order requiring him to have his weapon in his possession at all times except when engaged in athletic endeavors, it appears from his testimony in mitigation that he had his rifle with him on the particular occasion charged. Although he thus directly contravened his plea, neither the statement nor the plea was withdrawn. The latter, accordingly, must be held to be improvident. United States v Thompson, 13 USCMA 395, 32 CMR 395; United States v Walter, 16 USCMA 30, 36 CMR 186.

The petition for review is granted. The findings of guilty of specifications 2 and 3 of Charge I are set aside. The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The board may reassess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty, or order a rehearing on the charges involved and the penalty.