alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.3


Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as


Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Digital Realty Trust, Inc., in its capacity as the sole general partner of Digital Realty Trust, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:


(i)the accompanying amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Operating Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: April 1, 2016





/s/ A. William SteinA. William SteinChief Executive OfficerDigital Realty Trust, Inc., sole general partner ofDigital Realty Trust, L.P.








Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Operating Partnership filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Operating Partnership and will be retained by the Operating Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007209EN.01000101.xml

| 7.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 September 2007

(2007/C 209/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3669 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4472 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6773 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,345 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6427 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,42 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9075 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,608 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,59 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6991 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,82 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3235 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,765 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,782 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6571 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4433 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6491 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9828 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0862 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 283,72 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,891 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3042 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3225 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 845,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7886 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,629 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,07 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,486 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3669

JPY

Japanese yen

157,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4472

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6773

SEK

Swedish krona

9,345

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6427

ISK

Iceland króna

88,42

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9075

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,608

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,59

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6991

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,82

RON

Romanian leu

3,3235

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,765

TRY

Turkish lira

1,782

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6571

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4433

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6491

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9828

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0862

KRW

South Korean won

1 283,72

ZAR

South African rand

9,891

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3042

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3225

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 845,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7886

PHP

Philippine peso

63,629

RUB

Russian rouble

35,07

THB

Thai baht

44,486

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00322

- CV

Gloria Pena v. State Farm Lloyds

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- CCL

- 00811

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Februar y 15 , 2024
#### James P. Kernochan, Individually, and as Ex’r and Trustee, *et al.,*Resp’ts, *v.*The New York Elevated R. R. Co. *et al.,*App’lts.

*(New York Superior Court, General Term,*

*Filed January 6, 1890.)*

Evidence—Opinions as to value.

In an action against an elevated railroad a witness was asked to give *524the rental value for the following years, with and without the road. This was objected to as incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial, not within the issues and not a proper method of proof. The witness was allowed to answer. Similar testimony was subsequently given by both sides without objection. *Held,*that, under the circumstances, the objection in the form in which it was taken was unavailing, and that no error was committed calling for a reversal.

Appeal from a judgment rendered at an equity term of this court. 0

The judgment awards to the plaintiffs the sum of $1,720.50 damages and costs, and an injunction restraining the defendants from the further maintenance and operation of their elevated railway in front of the premises, No. 160 Pearl street, unless they pay to the plaintiffs the sum of $8,000,

*B.*Tolies, for app’lts; *O. W. Van Ness,*for resp’ts.

Per Curiam.

All the questions presented on this appeal háve been passed upon by the general term of this court adversely to-the defendant except the objection to the question put to one of the experts called by the plaintiffs, whereby the witness was requested to “ give the rental value for the following years, with and without the road.”

To that question the defendant objected as “incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial, and not within the issues of this action, and not a proper method of proof.”

The objection was to the whole question and so far as the question required the opinion of the witness as to the value of the property at the time, the evidence was clearly competent The attention of the court was not called to the objection now urged that the portion of the question that required the witness to give his opinion as to the rental value of the premises without the elevated railroad was incompetent and no motion was made to-strike out any portion of the answer after it was given. Considerable testimony was subsequently given on the same subject by both plaintiffs and defendants without objection.

Under these circumstances we think the objection in the form it was taken was unavailing. An examination of the whole case has satisfied us that the findings are sustained by the evidence and the result would have been the same if the evidence now objected to had not been received.

We think therefore that no error was committed that requires; a reversal of the judgment, and that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Ingraham, J., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texa s** 
September 13, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00615

- CR
Harry SCOTT
, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR7403 Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding


### ORDER
The trial court’s certification in this appeal states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(a)(2). This court must dismiss this appeal “ if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
We ORDER A ppellant to cause an amended trial court certification to be filed in this court within THIRTY days of the date of this order showing A ppellant has the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d)
, 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State
, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). If no amended trial court certification is filed as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d)

. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of September, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE
, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pol Brisset, President, Director,  President, Chief Executive and Operating Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary of Buckeye Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended May 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results  of operations of the Company.








Dated: August 23, 2011





By: /s/ Pol Brisset


Name: Pol Brisset


Title: Director, President, Chief Executive Officer,


Chief Operating Officer, and Treasurer


(Principal Executive, Financial & Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.1










CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)




Dated March 29, 2012






I, Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., as servicer (the “Servicer”), certify that:




1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Storm Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of August 18, 2010 between Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer, in all material respects; and




5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








By: /s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.




Name:  Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.


Title:    Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
# C_2007134EN.01000801.xml

| 16.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 June 2007

(2007/C 134/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3314 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 164,42 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4460 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67595 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4270 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6576 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,59 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0935 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5835 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,586 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,69 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8114 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2366 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,184 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7608 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5922 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4159 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4103 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7696 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0539 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 236,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5691 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1525 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3475 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 043,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6033 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,710 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6680 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,279 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3314

JPY

Japanese yen

164,42

DKK

Danish krone

7,4460

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67595

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4270

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6576

ISK

Iceland króna

83,59

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0935

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5835

CZK

Czech koruna

28,586

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,69

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8114

RON

Romanian leu

3,2366

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,184

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7608

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5922

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4159

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4103

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7696

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0539

KRW

South Korean won

1 236,01

ZAR

South African rand

9,5691

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1525

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3475

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 043,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6033

PHP

Philippine peso

61,710

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6680

THB

Thai baht

43,279

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9072 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9072

  To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide candidates 
     with a justification for candidate protection determinations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2024

  Mr. Pfluger (for himself and Mr. Gimenez) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide candidates 
     with a justification for candidate protection determinations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Counter Secretary Negligence In 
Protecting Election Runners Act'' or the ``Counter SNIPER Act''.

SEC. 2. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE PROTECTION.

    Section 3056 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(h)(1) In the case that the Secretary of Homeland Security 
determines that any Presidential candidate requesting a protective 
detail or an increase in assigned protective detail resources is not 
eligible for such detail or increased resources for the purpose of this 
section, the Secretary shall submit to the candidate and the advisory 
committee, within 14 days after such a request is made, a written 
notice of the Secretary's determination, indicating the criteria that 
such candidates failed to meet for such purpose.
    ``(2) Any Presidential candidate may submit to the Secretary of 
Homeland Security a written request to reconsider the determination 
described in paragraph (1), which may include facts to support that the 
criteria specified by the Secretary of Homeland Security have been met 
for the purpose of this section.
    ``(3) Not later than 14 days after a request for reconsideration is 
submitted under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
review such request and submit to the Presidential candidate a written 
notice of the Secretary's final determination on whether the criteria 
have been met for the purpose of this section, and provide a copy of 
such final determination to the advisory committee.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 28 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 1 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 28 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 2 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 28 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 3 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 28 Filed: 01/06/12 Page: 4 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T12:19:32-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 34.1


KPMG LLP
 265 Clinton Square
 Rochester, NY 14604-1701


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors and Management


The Student Loan Corporation:




We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that The Student Loan Corporation (The Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the asset backed securities transactions involving student loans for which the Company acted as servicer (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Appendix A to Management Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material respects.







/s/ KPMG LLP





Rochester, New York


March 17, 2011
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as the Principal Financial Officer of China ShouGuan Mining Corporation (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:   March 10, 2016
/s/ Chengqing Tan

  

Chengqing Tan

Principal Financial Officer

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|