alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                      President                                                                                                     Toyota Auto Receivables Finance, LLC, as Depositor |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7482

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CURTIS RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Dale Richardson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:15-cr-00492-RBH-1; 4:16-cv-02981-RBH)

Submitted: April 24, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Dolan Taylor, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, 

a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that 

the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Richardson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Richardson’s motion for bail or release 

pending appeal, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case: 2:11-cv-00043-EAS-TPK Doc #: 9 Filed: 05/04/11 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T17:19:45-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Government Properties Trusts, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas D. Peschio, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.   Date: November 3, 2005 /s/ Thomas D. Peschio       Thomas D. Peschio   President, Chief Executive Officer 
25
October 13, 1950

No. 54750.

Suit 4622.

#### United States *v.*Paul Pankey and Company.

-Abstract 52919 reversed February 2, 1950, without approving the collector’s classification. C. A. D. 429.
# C_2007172EN.01000302.xml

| 25.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4660 — MSREF/Hilton Hotels/Portfolio Hotels)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 172/03)

On 10 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4660. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4660. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Jamie L. Buskill, certify that:

1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC;

2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under Boardwalks supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report Boardwalks conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5)

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Dated:  October 21, 2005

/s/ Jamie L. Buskill

Jamie L. Buskill

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AP52 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: RobertJ Wayland 

 03/04/2011 06:47 PM 

 Cc: Thomas Gillis, Karen Thundiyil, Bill Maxwell, Tom Walton 

4 Attachments

Summary of Interagency Working Comments on draft EGU MACT under EO 12866 Interagency

Review_ 03 04 2011.doc

Nash Expert Report.pdf

ref2011_d120810c_2007_dollars.xls

US_Coal_Distribution_Electric_Power_Sector_AIW_2007_2009.xls

Hi Bob,

Attached you will find interagency comments on RIN 2060‐AP52.  The comments reference the three

other documents attached.  Additionally, the comments on Chapter 9 of the RIA, as well as some of the

TSDs, are forthcoming (likely ready by Monday).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Cortney

________________________________________________

Cortney Higgins 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
Hi Bob, 

Attached you will find interagency comments on RIN 2060-AP52. The 

comments reference the three other documents attached. Additionally, the 

comments on Chapter 9 of the RIA, as well as some of the TSDs, are 

forthcoming (likely ready by Monday). 

 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

 

Thanks! 

 

Cortney 

 

________________________________________________ 

Cortney Higgins 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
Order entered October 9, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00739
- CV
GALLERIA MALL INVEST ORS LP, Appellant
V. GT DALLAS PROPERTIES , LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 11
- 05581 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s October 4, 2013 status report regarding settlement and agreed second motion for extension. The Court GRANTS the motion , ABATES this appeal until December 3, 2013, and EXT ENDS the deadline for filing the Clerk’s record until December 27, 2013. The Court further ORDERS appellant to file, on or before December 3, 2013, either (1) a status report regarding settlement, or (2) a motion to dismiss the appeal.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Protect Pharmaceutical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ramesha Sesha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/   Ramesha Sesha





Ramesha Sesha


Chief Executive Officer


Principal Financial Officer


Principal Accounting Officer


March 31, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Portec Rail Products, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 November 10, 2005
    
    /s/ John S. CooperDate
    
    John S. CooperPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS3153 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Before the Second Division,

February 10, 1943

No. 48001.

#### Protests 543492-G, etc., of A. Hirschberger (New York).

Opinion by.

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) the protests were sustained as .to certain of the items.
Enclosure II 

ARB Public Hearing Notice
**Exhibit 3.3.2**

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT 

OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF 

HIGHLANDHOSPITALITY, L.P. 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF HIGHLAND HOSPITALITY, L.P.(this “First Amendment” to the “Partnership Agreement”), dated as of September 30, 2004, is entered into by HHC GP Corporation, as general partner (the “General Partner”) of Highland Hospitality, L.P. (the“Partnership”), for itself and on behalf of the limited partners of the Partnership (the “Limited Partners”). 

WITNESSETH 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the General Partner and its parent, HighlandHospitality Corporation (the “Company”), has determined that it is necessary and appropriate to amend the Partnership Agreement to allocate the legal rights and responsibilities between the General Partner and the Company as originallyintended at the time the General Partner became such in 2003; and 

WHEREAS, the Board has determined that further amendments to thePartnership Agreement are necessary and appropriate to accurately reflect the intended economic relationship between the Company and the Partnership as one evidenced by parity between one share of the Company’s common stock and one unit oflimited partnership interest in the Partnership; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XI of the Partnership Agreement, the General Partner hasdetermined that the amendments proposed to be effected do not require the consent of the limited partners and, for administrative convenience, desires to effect the proposed amendments and integrate them into the Partnership Agreement to read as setforth on Exhibit A hereto. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and for good and valuable consideration, theGeneral Partner hereby amends the Partnership Agreement to read in its entirety as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Second Amendment as of the 30th day of September,2004. 

 
HHC GP CORPORATION      as General Partner of      Highland Hospitality, L.P.By: 
/s/ Tracy M. J. Colden
 Tracy M. J. Colden Executive Vice President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) to the quarterly report of G2 Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2009 (the Report), I, Gust Kepler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Gust Kepler        
|Gust Kepler            
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 7, 2009         

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## NO. 12

- 19

- 00282

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF B .L.L.,

A CHILD §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 402N D

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

On August 14, 2019 , the clerk of this Court notified Appellant , B.N.W. , that the filing fee

in this appeal is due. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing

fee on or before August 26 , would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including

dismissal of the case without further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). The date for remit ting

the filing fee passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request.

Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered September 11, 2019.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

SEPTEMBER 11 , 2019

NO. 12

- 19

- 00282

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.L.L., A CHILD

Appeal from the 402nd District Court

of Wood County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2013

- 335)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this

appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court below

for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and N eeley, J.