### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 0 9

- 2 0 7 0 9 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

J A M E S C A V A Z O S
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l a n t

v

.

J P M O R G A N C H A S E B A N K N A T I O N A L A S S O C I A T I O N ; B A R R E T T D A F F I N F R A P P I E R T U R N E R & E N G L E L

. L

. P

. ; E M C M O R T G A G E C O R P O R A T I O N ; M E R S ; S O U T H S T A R F U N D I N G L L C ; M E R S C O R P I N C O R P O R A T E D
,

D e f e n d a n t s

- A p p e l l e e s

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 4 : 0 9

- C V

- 6 4 8

B e f o r e S M I T H
, P R A D O
, a n d H A Y N E S
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

J a m e s C a v a z o s a p p e a l s t h e j u d g m e n t d i s m i s s i n g , f o r l a c k o f

j u r i s d i c t i o n , h i s m o r t g a g e f

r a u d s u i t a g a i n s t t h e d e f e n d a n t s

. C a v a z o s ’ s i n i t i a l b r i e f f a i l e d t o

a t t e m p t t o d e m o n s t r a t e e r r o r i n t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d e t e r m i n a t i o n t h a t h e w a s U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D July 22, 2 010

Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5
, the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-20709 Document: 00511181763 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2010N o

. 0 9

- 2 0 7 0 9

w i t h o u t s t a n d i n g t o s u e

. C a v a z o s ’ s f a i l u r e t o i d e n t i f y a n y e r r o r i n t h e d i s t r i c t 1

c o u r t ’ s a n a l y s i s o n t h i s i s s u e c o n s t i t u t e s a f a i l u r e t o a p p e a l t h a t r u l i n g

. S e e
B r i n k m a n n v

. D a l l a s C o u n t y D e p u t y S h e r i f

f A b n e r , 8 1 3 F

. 2 d 7 4 4 , 7 4 8 ( 5 t h C i r

. 1 9 8 7 )

. A s a r e o t h e r l i t i g a n t s , a p r o s e p a r t y i s r e q u i r e d t o b r i e f a r g u m e n t s i n

o r d e r t o p r e s e r v e t h e m

. Y o h e y v

. C o l l i n s , 9 8 5 F

. 2 d 2 2 2
, 2 2 4

- 2 5 ( 5 t h C i r

. 1 9 9 3 )

. C o n s e q u e n t l y , w e d e e m C a v a z o s ’ s a p p e a l t o h a v e b e e n a b a n d o n e d

. H i s e f f o r t t o

a d d r e s s s t a n d i n g i n h i s r e p l y b r i e f c o m e s t o o l a t e , a s w e w i l l n o t c o n s i d e r

a r g u m e n t s r a i s e d f

o r t h e f i r s t t i m e i n a r e p l y b r i e f

. U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. J a c k s o n , 2

4 2 6 F

. 3 d 3 0 1 , 3 0 4 n

. 2 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 5 ) ( “ A r g u m e n t s r a i s e d f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e i n a

r e p l y b r i e f
, e v e n b y p r o s e l i t i g a n t s

. . . a r e w a i v e d

. ” ) A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e j u d g m e n t

b e l o w i s a f

f i r m e d ; t h e p e n d i n g m o t i o n t o s t r i k e C a v a z o s ’ s r e c o r d e x c e r p t s i s
d e n i e d a s m o o t

. A F F I R M E D ; M O T I O N T O S T R I K E R E C O R D E X C E R P T S D E N I E D A S

M O O T

.

Cavazos cont ende d only that a “N oti c e of Inter natio nal Com me rci al Claim in

1 Adm iral ty Adm inis tra tive Rem edy” he sent to the def enda nts around the tim e this cas e wa s

rem oved cons tit utes pr oof of his clai me d ow ners hip in the pr ope rty due to “es top pel by acqui es cenc e.” To the extent that this cons tit utes a chall enge to the dis tri ct cour t’s st andi ng det erm inati on, it is f

rivol ous

.
In any event , Cavazos ’s rep ly brie f is w h o l l y l a ck ing in any legal cit atio n, relyi ng 2 ins tead on quot ing Latin maxim s wh ich in no wa y add res s the sp ecif ic reas oning of the dis tri ct

cour t.

2 Case: 09-20709 Document: 00511181763 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/22/2010