alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Portable Marine Gasoline Fuel T

Pressure and Temperature Measure

Field Data Review

Date: Oct 30th, 2009

Prepared by:Mercury Marine Mike Torgerud
Location (City, State)

Fuel Source and Type

DateTime Fuel Temp (°F) Pressure (psi)

9am

10am11am12pm

1pm2pm3pm4pm5pm

Procedure:1. Fill tank to “safe fill” line on side of tank with low octane fuel from filling station with undergrou2. Store in full sun (southern exposure), on black surface isolated from wind3. Record data with vent closed for 3 consecutive days (table below)

Fuel Tank Measurements- Field Test

“Fill tank during coolest time of day/ night”

CAUTION NOTE: (monito

Place a rag over cap or connecdisassembly if service is requirDO NOT OPEN OR CONNECTIF PRESSURE EXCEEDS 5 PSI

Note- Photograph se

any temperatures/ prexceeding 90°F or 5p(document time/date 

Dial Pressure 

Gauge

(m
Portable Marine Gasoline Fuel Tanks (3 and 6 gallon)

Peak Gasoline Temperatures / Pressures

Measured October 26-29 2009

113°F 

3.0 psi 106°F 

4.0 psi

(7.0rvp) *

(11.5rvp)*

(11.5rvp)*

* REID VAPOR PRESSURE (RVP) PER ASTM D4814 TABLE 4

105°F 

6.0 psi
Observations:

- Gasoline volatility varies by region per ASTM 4814- Portable fuel tanks expand significantly when under pressure- Portable tank gasoline temperature exceeds ambient air temperature 

Conclusions:

- Gasoline within closed portable fuel tanks in the U.S. will exceed 108°- The above values were achieved with an estimated 11.5 rvp Florida fu

“ASTM Seasonal and Geographic Volatility Classes (ASTM D48

- Elastic nature of tank has an effect on resultant tank pressure due to i
Appendix
Set-up

Air 

(°F)

3 gallon fuel tank 

(filled to “safe-fill”)

* REID VAPOR PRESSURE (RVP) PER ASTM D4814 TABLE 4

Test Location #1
Location Glendale, AZ 85305 (Lat/Lon: N 33° 32.350' W 112° 15.599' ) (Elevation: 1060 ft.)

Fuel Source Chevron (Lat/Lon: N 33° 38.083' W 112° 15.277' )

Type 87 Octane

Date 10/26/2009

Fuel Temp (°F) Pressure (psi) Air Temp (°F) Humidity %

Time 9am 75.4 0 76.5 18

10am 82.6 1 77.4 1811am 91.8 2 78.6 18

12pm 97.4 3 79.1 18

1pm 104.3 3.5 81.5 172pm 105.4 4 82.2 173pm 106.6 4 83.1 174pm 101.6 3.5 82.4 175pm 98.2 2.5 81.5 17

Peak Pressure 

Peak Temperature

Set-up

3 gallon fuel tank 

(filled to “safe-fill”)

Test Location #2
Peak Fuel Pressure 

Recorded 10/29/09

Test Location #3

5:00 PM 96° 5.04:00 PM 102° 5.5

3:00 PM 105° 6.02:00 PM 104° 6.5

1:00 PM 100° 6.0

12:00 PM 91° 5.5

11:00 AM 82° 4.0

10:00 AM 75° 2.0

9:00 AM 69° 1.0

8:00 AM 62° 0.5

Time Fuel Temp (F) Pressure (PSI)

10/29/09 Day 4

TR 2009-1829

Peak Fuel 

Temperature 

Recorded 10/29/09
KEY LARGO, FL.

HESS FUEL STATION KEY LARGO 87 OCTANE REGULAR FUEL10-26-09 CLEAR SUNNY DAY

FUEL TEMP PSI

9AM 82.6 1.510AM 95.0 3.011AM 100.4 3.012PM 104 5.01PM 104.4 5.02PM 108.4 6.03PM 108.4 6.04PM 107 5.05PM 104.8 5.0

Pressure 

Gauge

Thermocouple 

(measurement in 

at bottom of 

3 gallon fuel tank 

(filled to “safe-fill”)

Peak Values 

Recorded 10/26/09

Test Location #4
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
J. Kimo Esplin, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Huntsman LLC for the three months ended June 30, 2004;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
December 8, 2004

| |  |  | /s/J. KIMO ESPLINJ. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial Officer
| |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
MBSA AIR GROUP 

410 North 44"" Street 

Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

Office (602) 685-4000 

Fax (602) 685-4350 

December 28, 2009 

pffp^ •Hiio?-

d3^i^ 

M. Clay Mortiz, Jr. 

United States Department of Transportation 

Research and Technology Administration 

Bureau of Transportation Statistics, OAI, RTS-42 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, East Building, E34 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re.: Confidential Treatment Request for BTS Form 41 for Mesa Airlines, 

Inc.; BTS Form 298-C, Schedule F-1 for Air Midwest, Inc. and Freedom Airlines, 

Inc. (the "Forms") 

Dear Mr. M. Clay Mortiz, Jr., 

Please accept the following request in reference to the above listed Forms. As 

previously communicated to the Department of Transportation (the "Department"), 

Mesa Air Group, Inc's ("Mesa") fiscal year ends on September 30"^. As you know, 

Mesa along with its subsidiaries including the three airlines listed above file 

consolidated financial statements. Ail three of the airlines listed above have fiscal 

years ending on September 30'^. 

Mesa is currently preparing Its fourth quarter and year end financial statements 

and expects to file with the SEC no later than January 15, 2010. The information 

contained in the Forms contains non-public information that will be included in Mesa's 

SEC filings. Mesa is providing to the Department unaudited financial information in the 

attached Forms and, if there are any changes, will resubmit updated financial 

information consistent with the final audited financials. 

Accordingly, Mesa requires that the Department keep the information provided in 

the Forms confidential and exclude it from any disclosures made pursuant to a 

Freedom of Information Act request or other request for information from any nongovernmental entity until after Mesa has filed its financial statements with the SEC that 

it expects to file as indicated above. 

If you need any additional information regarding this request, please do not 

hesitate to contact me at (602) 685-4052. 

Sincerely, 

Mesa Air Group, inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

RONALD D. LEONARD, 

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:09-CV-961

JUDGE MARBLEY

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

REHABILITATION

AND CORRECTION, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

RONALD D. LEONARD, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 2:10-CV-347

JUDGE MARBLEY

ERNIE MOORE, et al., MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________________

RONALD D. LEONARD,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:10-CV-951

JUDGE MARBLEY

ERNIE MOORE, et al., MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

Defendants.

ORDER

On May 5, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended that the motion for

judgment on the pleadings filed by defendants in 2:09-CV-961 be granted and that the motions to

dismiss filed in 2:10-CV-347 and 2:10-CV-951 be denied. Moreover, the Magistrate Judge directed

that plaintiff Worthington, who may have abandoned the prosecution of his claims in 2:09-CV-961 and

2:10-CV-347, file a statement of his intention to pursue his claims within twenty-one (21) days. Order

Case: 2:10-cv-00951-ALM-NMK Doc #: 47 Filed: 07/08/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
and Report and Recommendation. Although the parties were advised of their right to object to that

recommendation, there has been no objection. Moreover, plaintiff Worthington has not filed the

required statement of intent.

The recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

The motion for judgment on the pleadings, Doc. No. 71 in 2:09-CV-961, is GRANTED. The

Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT in that case.

The motions to dismiss, Doc. No. 28 in 2:10-CV-347 and Doc. No. 34 in 2:10-CV-951, are

DENIED.

The claims of plaintiff Cole Worthington in 2:10-CV-347 are DISMISSED for failure to

prosecute.

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge 

2

Case: 2:10-cv-00951-ALM-NMK Doc #: 47 Filed: 07/08/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007183EN.01000801.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 June 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg, Germany) — Firma Laub GmbH & Co. Vieh & Fleisch Import-Export v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-428/05) (1)

1

(Export refunds - Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 - Definition of ‘undue payment of a refund’ - Payment of a refund on the basis of incomplete documentation - Possibility of completing the documents relating to the payment of the refund after the expiry of the periods referred to in Articles 47(2) and 48(2)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 in the context of a subsequent recovery procedure)

(2007/C 183/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Firma Laub GmbH & Co. Vieh & Fleisch Import-Export

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Hamburg — Interpretation of Articles 11(3), subparagraph 1, first sentence, Article 47(2) and 48(2)(a) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 of 27 November 1987 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products (OJ 1987 L 351, p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 495/97 of 18 March 1997 (OJ 1997 L 77, p. 12) — Concept of ‘undue payment of a refund’ — Recovery of refunds awarded on production of an incomplete transport document, the duly completed document having been produced only after expiry of the time-limits

Operative part of the judgment

An export refund can not be regarded as ‘unduly paid’, within the meaning of the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 11(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 of 27 November 1987 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products, as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 604/98 of 17 March 1998, if the beneficiary, in the context of a recovery procedure for the refund, produces the necessary evidence to justify its right to that refund. It is a matter for the competent national authorities to set a reasonable time-limit which allows the beneficiary to produce this evidence.

---

(1)  OJ C 36, 11.2.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 10.44


 


AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS,
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Mohan Misra (the “Executive”) entered into an Executive Employment Agreement
dated as of April 30, 2007 (the “Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive desire to amend the terms of the Agreement relating
to salary and hours devoted to the Company.


 


WHEREAS, the Company’s Compensation Committee has
approved the amendment to the Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the Company and Executive agree that the Base Salary (as defined in
the Agreement) of the Executive shall be $161,625 beginning January 7,
2008, and that Section 2 of the Agreement is amended and superseded in its
entirety to read as follows:


 


Duties.   The executive will devote at least 20 hours
per week and his energies and best efforts to the promotion of the business and
affairs of the Company, with responsibility to perform such duties as are
specified from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”)
and/or the chief executive officer of the Company (the CEO)”. The Executive
should report to the Board.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment, in the case
of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of July 1, 2008.


 


 


	
  COMPANY:

  	
  ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Gary Gatchell

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Gary
  Gatchell

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chief
  Financial Officer

  
				



 


 


	
  EXECUTIVE:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/  Mohan Misra

  
	
   

  	
  Mohan
  Misra
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Yam Chi-Wah, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransAKT Ltd. for
      the period ended March 31, 2015 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of TransAKT Ltd.                                                                 

|Dated: May 20, 2015 | /s/ Yam Chi-Wah                                                    
|------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Yam Chi-Wah                                                        
|                    | Chief Financial Officer                                            
|                    | (Principal Financial Office and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
|                    | TransAKT Ltd.                                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TransAKT Ltd.
and will be retained by TransAKT Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 4-3(b)

                       AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, the Company has postponed the annual meeting of the Company scheduled
for November 17, 2000; and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Rights Agreement in accordance with
Section 5.4 of the Rights Agreement to extend the date for submission to the
shareholders of the Company at such meeting.

       NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the definition of "Effective
Rejection Date" is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore:

            "Effective Rejection Date" shall mean the date that is ninety
            (90) days after the date of the annual meeting of the Company
            at which the Company submits this Agreement to the
            shareholders of the Company for ratification and holders of
            more than 50% of the Common Stock of the Corporation
            outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting are cast
            against ratification.

       RESOLVED, That the proper Officers of the Corporation be, and each of
them hereby is, authorized and empowered, jointly and severally, for and in the
name and on behalf of the Corporation, to execute and deliver any and all
certificates, agreements and other documents, take any and all steps and do any
and all things which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in
order to effectuate the purposes of each and all of the foregoing resolutions.

       RESOLVED, That any actions taken by such Officers prior to the date of
the foregoing resolutions adopted at this meeting that are within the authority
conferred hereby are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved as the act and deed
of the Corporation.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Summary of Horace Mann Educators Corporation Non-Employee Director Compensation 
  

			
	 Compensation Element
	  	 Amount

	 Chairman Annual Retainer
	  	$75,000
	 Non-Chairman Annual Retainer
	  	$25,000
	 Board Meeting Fee
	  	$1,500/live or telephonic meeting
	 Audit Chair Retainer
	  	$10,000
	 Compensation Chair Retainer
	  	$6,000
	 Executive Chair Retainer
	  	$4,000
	 Investment & Finance Chair Retainer
	  	$4,000
	 Nominating & Governance Chair Retainer
	  	$4,000
	 Strategy Oversight Chair Retainer
	  	$4,000
	 Committee Meeting Fee
	  	$1,000/live or telephonic meeting ($1,500 for audit; $2,500 for audit chair)
	 Deferred Fees
	  	Deferred fees in the form of common stock equivalent units include a 25% matching addition.
	 Share-based Compensation
	  	 2,000 Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) upon joining the Board and an additional 2,000 RSUs if joining within 6 months after the prior Annual
Shareholder Meeting or an additional 1,000 RSUs if joining more than 6 months after the prior Annual Shareholder Meeting but before the next Annual Shareholder Meeting
 2,000 RSUs annually thereafter following the Annual Shareholder Meeting

	 Stock Ownership Guidelines
	  	2x annual cash retainer within 5 years; must retain all restricted shares (net of taxes) until guideline is met

 Retainer fees are paid following the Annual Shareholder Meeting of each year. The retainer fees are prorated to
the extent that a non-employee director joins the Board after the Annual Shareholder Meeting.
**AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JUDGMENT IN CIVIL CASE 

COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, :

LLC, : Case No. 2:11-CV-485

:

 Plaintiff, : JUDGE ALGENON L.

: MARBLEY

 v. :

: Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel

: 

KANWAL N. SINGH, et al., :

:

 Defendants. :

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and

the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the March 26, 2012

Opinion and Order, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce

Settlement. Columbia Gas’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, and Defendants’ pro se counterclaims are also DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

Date: March 26, 2012 James Bonini, Clerk

 s/Betty L. Clark 

 Betty L. Clark/Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00485-ALM-MRA Doc #: 32 Filed: 03/26/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the amended annual Report of Vantage Health
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Lisa Ramakrishnan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and



2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.



|By:    | /s/Lisa Ramakrishnan                                                         
|------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Lisa Ramakrishnan                                                            
|Title: | Principal Executive Officer,
        Principal Financial Officer and Director
|Date:  | November 21, 2011                                                            



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO




2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

OF

ENDURANCE SPECIALTY HOLDINGS LTD.




          WHEREAS, Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) desires to amend the 2007 Equity
Incentive Plan (as amended and in effect, the “Plan”) of the Company to fix at $70,000 the dollar
value of equity incentives to be granted to non-employee directors of the Company each year
following the Company’s Annual General Meeting (the “Plan Amendment”); and




          WHEREAS, on February 13, 2008, subject to shareholder approval, the Board of Directors of the
Company approved the Plan Amendment.




          NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:





	1.	 	Section 7(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and substituting
the following in lieu thereof:
	 
	 	 	“Annual Grant. Each Director in office at the close of business on the date of the Annual
General Meeting of shareholders of the Company shall be granted on such date either (i) an
Option to purchase Ordinary Shares or (ii) Restricted Shares. The determination to grant
Restricted Shares or Options shall be made at a meeting of the Committee prior to the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders each year. The number of Options granted shall be
determined utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with an aggregate grant value
of $70,000 on the date of grant, at a per Ordinary Share exercise price equal to the Fair
Market Value of one Ordinary Share on such date, a perpetual dividend rate equal to the
most recent quarterly dividend (discounted to present value utilizing the current risk free
rate of return) and the average volatility of the Ordinary Shares on the Stock Exchange
over the last 30 trading days. The per Ordinary Share exercise price of any Options
granted shall be equal to the Fair Market Value of one Ordinary Share on the date of grant.
The number of Restricted Shares granted shall be equal to $70,000 divided by the Fair
Market Value of an Ordinary Share on the date of grant, rounded downward to the nearest
whole number of Restricted Shares. The number of Options or Restricted Shares granted shall
be subject to adjustment pursuant to the provisions of Section 16 hereof.”
	 
	2.	 	The Plan Amendment shall be effective upon approval of the shareholders of the Company at the
2008 Annual General Meeting. If the Plan Amendment is not so approved at such meeting, then
the Plan Amendment shall be void ab initio.
	 
	3.	 	Except herein above provided, the Plan is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved in all
respects.
Exhibit 10.36
 DIRECTORS RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 DIRECTORS RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT Agreement Grant Date Company [  ] you
 Restricted Stock Unit Grant Plan [  ]
 The Plan
 Restrictions on Transfer Transfer
 Vesting Schedule
 Payment
 Forfeiture
 Rights as Common Stockholder
 Dividend Equivalents
 Adjustments




---



##### 



Section 409A of the Code Code
 Not a Retention Agreement
 Notice NeuStar, Inc., Attn: General Counsel, 46000 Center Oak
Plaza, Sterling, VA 20166.
 You will not have any rights with respect to your Restricted Stock Unit Award unless and until you
deliver an executed copy of this Agreement to the Company within 60 days of the Grant Date.
 NEUSTAR, INC.By:Jeffrey E. Ganek
    
    
    
    []