alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(d) Certification

 

I, In-Young Chase, certify that:

 

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reportson Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of SATURNS Trust No.2010-01 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. 	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the ExchangeAct periodic reports;

 

4. 	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s)required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer,The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of SATURNS Trust No. 2010-01, has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement,which is the Trust Agreement relating to SATURNS Trust No. 2010-01; and

 

5. 	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report. Any material instances of noncompliance describedin such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and its officers and agents.

 

 

 

By:	/s/In-YoungChase	

Name:	In-YoungChase
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MakeMyTrip Limited (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: June 12, 2013

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, and is not being “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subjectto the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
No. 54160.

#### British American Importation Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 138616-K (A)/12944 and 138616-K (B)/12826 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Second Division,

January 14, 1942

No. 46819.

#### Protests 981907-G, etc., of Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J

In view of the holding in *Riley*v. *United States*(8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 116, T. D. 37225), which was recently called to the court’s attention, wherein certain woven woolen spreads used to cover the legs and body in automobiles, on couches, or in carriages were held dutiable as woven blankets, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as manufactures of cotton, not specially provided for, at 40 percent under paragraph 923 as claimed.
No. 40286.

#### Protests 460012-G, etc., of American Import Co. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

On the records presented the protests were overruled.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

DMX ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 Civil Action 2:10-cv-992

v. Judge James L. Graham

 Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DRUG 

ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the May 23, 2011 Report and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers, to whom

this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (ECF No. 5.) The Magistrate Judge

recommended that the Court grant dismiss this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process. 

The Report and Recommendation specifically advises parties that the failure to object to

the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results in a “waiver of the

right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of

the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 2, ECF No. 5.) The time period for filing

objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiffs have not objected to the

Report and Recommendation. 

Case: 2:10-cv-00992-JLG-EPD Doc #: 6 Filed: 06/07/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections have

been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report

and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT

PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/ James L. Graham 

James L. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Date: June 7, 2011

2

Case: 2:10-cv-00992-JLG-EPD Doc #: 6 Filed: 06/07/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2005-23361; Airspace Docket No. 05-ANM-17]
RIN 2120-AA66


Revision of Class E Airspace; Pinedale, WY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This technical amendment corrects a final rule published in 
the Federal Register on July 24, 2006 (71 FR 41728), Docket No. FAA-
2005-23361, Airspace Docket No. 05-ANM-17. In that rule, the reference 
to FAA Order 7400.9 was published as FAA Order 7400.9O. The correct 
reference is FAA Order 7400.9P. Also, the corresponding date that 
refers to the date the Order was signed was omitted. The final rule 
should state ``* * * dated September 1, 2006 * * *'' (prior to the 
effective date), instead of ``* * * updated yearly * * *''. This 
technical amendment corrects those errors.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, April 3, 2007. The Director of the Federal 
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR 
part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tameka Bentley, Airspace and Rules, 
Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone: (202) 267-8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On July 24, 2006, a final rule was published in the Federal 
Register, Docket No. FAA-2005-23361, Airspace Docket No. 05-ANM-17 that 
amended Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations part 71 by revising Class 
E Airspace; Pinedale, WY (71 FR 41728). In that rule, the reference to 
FAA Order 7400.9 was published as FAA Order 7400.9O. The correct 
reference is FAA Order 7400.9P. In addition, the corresponding date 
that refers to the date the Order was signed had been omitted. The 
final rule should state ``* * * dated September 1, 2006 * * *'' (prior 
to the effective date), instead of ``* * * updated yearly * * *''.

Amendment to Final Rule

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the reference 
to FAA Order 7400.9 for Airspace Docket No. FAA-2005-23361, Airspace 
Docket No. 05-ANM-17, as published in the Federal Register on July 24, 
2006 (71 FR 41728), is corrected as follows:
0
On page 41728, column 2, line 13, and column 3, lines 5, and 7, amend 
the language to read:


Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

* * * * *
    ``FAA Order 7400.9P'' instead of ``FAA Order 7400.9O''
    Remove ``* * * updated yearly * * *'' and insert ``* * * dated 
September 1, 2006 * * *''
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, March 23, 2007.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace and Rules.
[FR Doc. E7-6100 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Doran, President and Chief Executive Officer of Doranetti Music Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Doranetti Music Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 20, 2006

/s/ Christopher Doran	Christopher Doran
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1
      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Excelsis Investments Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Brian McFadden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated this 25th day of April, 2014.
   BRIAN McFADDENBrian McFaddenChief Executive Officer
(Reap. Dec. 8343)

#### Arthur J. Humphreys *v.*United States

Entry No. 1177-K, etc.

(Decided October 14, 1954)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows concerning the merchandise referred to below:

> 1) The merchandise covered by these appeals consists of firebrick imported from Canada and invoiced with descriptions the same as those set forth in paragraph 2 below.

> 2) At the time of exportation neither a foreign value, an export value, nor a United States value existed for such or similar merchandise, and the cost of production for the imported merchandise, in Canadian dollars per 1,000 pieces, was as given below less 10 percent:

> March 1,1948, to July 31,1949

> Straights or squares_ 85.00

> Side arch, end wedge, splits 1)4, *1%*and 2"_ 85. 00

> “E” blocks___ 127.50

> 3)The appeals are abandoned as to all merchandise except that invoiced under the descriptions given in paragraph 2 and upon this stipulation the appeals enumerated in attached schedule may be deemed to be submitted.

On the agreed facts I find tbe cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise described below, and that such values, for the merchandise exported during the period specified, were as follows:

> Canadian dollars per 1,000 pieces

> March 1, 1948, to July 31,1949

> Straights or squares_ 85.00

> Side arch, end wedge, splits 1)4,1)4 and 2"- 85. 00

> “E” blocks__1_ 127. 50

> All less 10 per centum

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Andamos en busca deunos niños especiales--

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Andamos en busca deunos niños especiales-- 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Social Security Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  026084571.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
ENCLOSURE I

LIST OF PUBLIC NOTICE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE DEPARTMENT On or about November 5, 2007, the Department took the following actions to provide timely notice of the proposed new rules and rule amendments to N .J .A.C. 7:27-24: Prevention of Air Pollution fromConsumer Products ; N .J .A .C. 7 :27-26: Prevention of Air Pollution from Adhesives, Sealants, Adhesives Primers and Sealant Primers; N .J .A.C. 7:27-34: TBAC Emissions Reporting; N

.J .A.C. 7:27- 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 25, N .J .A.C. 7:27B-3.1, N

.J .A.C. 7 :27A3.2: VOC Definition Change; and N .J .A .C. 7 :27A- 3 .10 Enforcement Penalties : 1 . Published the proposed new rules and amendments in the New Jersey Register on November 5, 2007 at 39 N .J .R . 4492(a) . 2. Published legal advertisements providing notice of the proposal, the date and location of the public hearing, specification of the public comment period, and the address for submission ofwritten comments in five newspapers of general circulation (copies of the legal advertisement and affidavits of its publication are enclosed) ; 3. Distributed copies of a Notice of Proposal to the New Jersey news media maintaining a press office in the New Jersey State House Complex ; 4. Posted a copy of the proposal on the Department's website; 5. Mailed copies of the proposal to 14 public libraries throughout the State, as well as to the Department's three regional offices and its public access center ; 6 . Mailed notice of the public hearing and copies of the proposal to the following states : Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New

York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and the District of Columbia; 7. Sent a copy of the proposal to EPA Region 2 ; 8. Electronically emailed a Notice of Public Hearing and Availability of the Proposal to approximately 350 interested parties; 9 . Mailed a Notice of Public Hearing and Availability of the Proposal to approximately 56 interested parties; 10 . The Department held a public hearing for the proposal on December 10, 2007, at the Department Headquarters Building, 401 E . State Street, Trenton, New Jersey, and accepted comments until close of business, January 4, 2008. The summary of public comment and the Department's responses are contained in the adoption document, which was published in the New Jersey Register on December l, 2008 at 40 N .J .R . 6769(a) ;
#### Ulrice Lesser, App’lt, v. Sarah A. Williams, Resp’t.

*M. A. Lesser,*for app’lt; *Biley*<6 *Gonway,*for resp’t.

Order affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Affirming 23 N. Y. State Rep., 396.
# C_2007284EN.01000901.xml

| 27.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/9

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4956 — STX/Aker)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 284/08)

| 1. | On 16 November 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which STX Corporation (‘STX’, South Korea) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Aker yards ASA (‘Aker’, Norway) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 16 November 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which STX Corporation (‘STX’, South Korea) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Aker yards ASA (‘Aker’, Norway) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | STX: shipbuilding and marine equipment, shipping, energy, construction, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

STX: shipbuilding and marine equipment, shipping, energy, construction,

| — | Aker: shipbuilding. |
| --- | --- |

—

Aker: shipbuilding.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4956 — STX/Aker to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4956 — STX/Aker to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---