alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007210EN.01000201.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 September 2007

(2007/C 210/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3696 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,79 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4467 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6773 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,326 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6437 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,02 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9085 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,631 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,47 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6984 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8081 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3032 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,726 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7697 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6564 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4398 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6646 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9834 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0867 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 284,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8556 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3261 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3209 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 870,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7998 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,734 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,112 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,546 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3696

JPY

Japanese yen

157,79

DKK

Danish krone

7,4467

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6773

SEK

Swedish krona

9,326

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6437

ISK

Iceland króna

88,02

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9085

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,631

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,47

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6984

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8081

RON

Romanian leu

3,3032

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,726

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7697

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6564

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4398

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6646

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9834

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0867

KRW

South Korean won

1 284,96

ZAR

South African rand

9,8556

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3261

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3209

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 870,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7998

PHP

Philippine peso

63,734

RUB

Russian rouble

35,112

THB

Thai baht

44,546

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 99.10



CONSENT OF DAVID (TED) COUPLAND



Reference is made to the technical report
entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Moro Gold-Silver Project, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina” dated
March 30, 2012, which contains certain scientific and technical information related to the Cerro Moro property of Extorre Gold
Mines Limited (the “Technical Report”).



I hereby consent to the inclusion of references
to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Extorre
Gold Mines Limited, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



Dated this April 2, 2012.



|/s/ David (Ted) Coupland                                               | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  David (Ted) Coupland, BSc DipGeoSc CFSG ASIA MAusIMM (CP) MMICA |
# C_2007235EN.01001402.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/14

---

Action brought on 18 July 2007 — Sepracor v OHIM — Laboratorios Ern (LEVENIA)

(Case T-280/07)

(2007/C 235/26)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Sepracor, Inc. (Malborough, United States) (represented by: E. De Gryse, E. Cornu, D. Moreau, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Laboratorios Ern, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office of Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 18 April 2007 in Case R 155/2006-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office of Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 18 April 2007 in Case R 155/2006-1;

| — | order the Office to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: Sepracor, Inc.

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The Community word mark ‘LEVENIA’ for goods in class 5 — application No 2 563 799

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Laboratorios Ern, SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The national word mark ‘LEVELINA’ for goods in classes 1 and 5

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant claims that the contested decision infringes Article 43 CTMR and Rule 22 CTMIR since the justification of the First Board of Appeal, which held that the non-use of the national trademark ‘LEVELINA’ was justified for a certain type of pharmaceutical products and preparations, cannot constitute a ‘proper reason’ for non-use in the sense of Article 43(2) CTMR. Moreover, the applicant contends that even if the Court were to consider that the finding of the Board was correct and that non-use was sufficiently justified, the contested decision allegedly infringes Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of United America Indemnity, Ltd. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Edward J. Noonan, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 10, 2005 /s/ Edward J. NoonanEdward J. Noonan
Acting Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       UT
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
TAMPA  ELECTIC  COMPANY  BALANCE  SHEETS,  STATEMENTS  OF  INCOME  AND
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000096271          
<NAME>                          Tampa Electric Company  
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-mos 
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK 
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        2,546 
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          7 
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             265 
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           252
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,070 
<COMMON>                                           119 
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                          893 
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                283 
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,295 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               727 
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     141 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        4 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0 
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0 
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0 
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     903 
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    3,070 
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                          354 
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                16 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         292 <F1>
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         308
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             46 
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 (2) 
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      44 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            17 
<NET-INCOME>                                        27 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0 
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       27 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            34 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           11
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             110
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00 
<FN>
<F1>     Includes a $9.6-million pretax non-recurring charge.
/FN
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IntelGenx Technologies
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Paul A. Simmons, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|March 28, 2011 | By: | /s/Paul A. Simmons                           | 
|-------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------- | 
|               |     | Paul A. Simmons                              | 
|               |     | Chief Financial Officer                     
|               |     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|               |     |                                              | 
|               |     |                                              | 

---
No. 41890.

#### Protest 190554-G of A. J. Bracher & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The claim as embroidered articles at 75 percent ad ■valorem under paragraph 1430 was sustained.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# AIDS, syphilis, gonorrhea, genital warts, chlamydia, hepatitis b, herpes "the wounds--that love's keen arrows make"

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  AIDS, syphilis, gonorrhea, genital warts, chlamydia, hepatitis b, herpes "the wounds--that love's keen arrows make" 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 90-116-P. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; #25Defense billboard (1988)#25. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17887-17888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-385-000]


Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Tariff Filing and 
Non-Conforming Service Agreement

April 4, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, Mississippi Canyon Gas 
Pipeline, LLC (Mississippi Canyon) as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 157, to become 
effective April 1, 2007.

[[Page 17888]]

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#084e4d5a4b47666461666d5b7d7878677a7c486e6d7a6b266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b6d6e796864454742454e785e5b5b44595f6b4d4e5948054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6687 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2007170EN.01003901.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/39

---

Action brought on 5 June 2007 — Cementownia ‘Warta’ v Commission

(Case T-198/07)

(2007/C 170/74)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Cementownia ‘Warta’ SA (represented by: P.K. Rosiak, legal adviser, and F. Puel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the Commission's decision of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Poland in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission's decision of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Poland in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 1295 final of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Poland in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), in which the Commission decided that certain aspects of the Polish National Allocation Plan for CO2 Emission Allowances for 2008-2012, notified to the Commission on 30 June 2006, were not compatible with Articles 9(1) and (3), 10 and 13(2) of and the criteria set out in Annex III to Directive 2003/87/EC. The decision in question reduces the carbon dioxide emission limit in 2008-2012 by 26.7 % compared to the limit proposed by Poland in the national allocation plan for emission allowances notified to the Commission.

1

2

The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the applicant are the same as those of the applicant in Case T-195/07.

---

(1)  Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsCHARLES R. RAMSEY

________________________________

Case No. 2:11-cr-273 (1)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to

Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one (1)

of the Indictment. After examining the Defendant under oath

concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that

the defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed plea,

that the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that the

offenses charged are supported by an independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements of such offense. 

 I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of

guilty should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty

and sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be

rejected and the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty

plea. 

The Defendant remains on bond pending sentencing. 

Date: March 21, 2012 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and

Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and

Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28

U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).

Case: 2:11-cr-00273-JLG-TPK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/21/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RAYMOND F. COLE, Fireman, U. S. Navy, Appellant

9 USCMA 155, 25 CMR 417

No. 10,831

Decided April 11, 1958

*Lieutenant (jg) Joseph A. Calif ano, Jr.,*USNR, and *Commander Charles Timblin,*USN, were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Craig McKee,*USN, and *Commander Louis L. Milano,*USN, were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CüRIAm:

The accused was found guilty of larceny, in violation of Article 121 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921, by a special court-martial. After intermediate appellate review, we granted review upon three issues. The third concerns an instruction by the president to the effect that the general intent requisite to all crimes may be presumed not only from a wrongful overt act, but also from a failure to act, whether such failure be intentional or negligent.

The Government concedes that the instruction is erroneous and prejudicial, and our examination of the record indicates that the concession is appropriate. See United States v Lampkins, 4 USCMA 31, 15 CMR 31; United States v Downard, 6 USCMA 538, 20 CMR 254; United States v Connell, 7 USCMA 228, 22 CMR 18.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial-is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A rehearing may be ordered.