alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ES-960-1420-BJ-TRST; Group No. 174, Wisconsin] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plat of survey; Wisconsin. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calender days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The lands we surveyed are:

## Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin 

T. 40 N., R. 7 W.

The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion of the north boundary, (Fourth Standard Parallel North) a portion of the east boundary, and a portion of the subdivisional lines; and the survey of the subdivision of sections 5-7, 16-20 and 26-36, Township 40 North, Range 7 West, of the Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin. 

If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest. 

We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals. 

Dated: March 22, 2007. 

Jerry L. Wahl, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Acting.

 [FR Doc. E7-5882 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(a)


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference to our firm under the captions "Financial
Information" and "Accountants and Financial Statements" in the prospectus and to
the use of our reports (1) dated April 13, 2001 with respect to the statutory-
basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Occidental Life
Insurance Company and (2) dated February 2, 2001 with respect to the subaccounts
of Separate Account VA-2L which are available for investment by contract owners
of the Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage Variable Annuity, included in Post-
Effective Amendment No. 17 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 33-49998)
and related Prospectus of Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage Variable
Annuity.


                                                Ernst & Young LLP


Des Moines, Iowa
April 24, 2001
Before the Third Division,

January 11, 1940

No. 42986.

#### Protests 886215-G, etc., of E. H. Silberman Paper Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It appeared that the chief use of the old cotton bagging in question is for paper making. On the record presented the claim for free entry under paragraph 1750 was sustained.
February 15, 1957

Reap. Dec. 8752.

#### F. *W. Woolworth Co.*v. *United States.*

Entered at Baltimore, Md. Decided January 4, 1957. [Not published.] Motion by plaintiff.
A90A1034.

#### TAYLOR v. THE STATE.

(394 SE2d 597)

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Trent Taylor appeals from his conviction of rape contending that it was error to admit evidence of a prior offense when the sole issue at trial was whether the victim consented to the act of sexual intercourse. *Held:*

In support of his position that the prior offense was not admissible, appellant relies upon *Wimberly v. State,*180 Ga. App. 148 (348 SE2d 692) (1986), which, in turn, relies upon *Larkins v. State,*230 Ga. 418, 420 (197 SE2d 367) (1973), for the rule that the similar offenses rule does not apply where the only issue for jury decision is the consent of the prosecutrix. *Wimberly,*supra at 150, holds only that there must be some logical connection or similarity between the offenses. It did not adopt the portion of the *Larkins*decision relied upon by appellant. This portion of *Larkins*was overruled in *Hunt v.*
      *635
      *State,*233 Ga. 329, 331 (211 SE2d 288) (1974); and *Thomas v. State,*234 Ga. 635, 636 (217 SE2d 152) (1975). In *Thomas*the court held that evidence which would show intent, motive, plan, scheme, and bent of mind was relevant as to whether or not the prosecutrix consented to the sexual acts committed upon her by the defendant.

Decided May 14, 1990.

*Cedric T. Leslie,*for appellant.

*Willis B. Sparks III, District Attorney, Graham A. Thorpe, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

In the instant case, the evidence showed that the victim lived with her small daughter and was awakened at knifepoint by a man who held a knife at her throat and forced her to submit to sexual intercourse. She recognized his voice and the general shape of his features in the dark as those of a man who worked on one of her work crews. The State presented evidence that several years earlier appellant had broken into the home of another woman who also had a small daughter, and was attempting to force her to have sexual intercourse at knifepoint when the police arrived before he completed the act. This evidence showed intent, motive, plan, scheme, and bent of mind, and was relevant as to whether or not the victim consented to having sexual relations with Taylor.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The FirstMarblehead Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Daniel Maxwell Meyers, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board ofDirectors, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|   | Dated: November 12, 2004                                                              |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ Daniel Maxwell Meyers                                                             |   |
|   | Daniel Maxwell Meyers  Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and willbe retained by The First Marblehead Corporation and furnished to the SEC or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
) 

Ronald D. Leonard, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Robin Knab, et a/., 

Defendants. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Case No. 2:1 0-cv-956 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

ORDER 

On January 22, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom 

this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(8) and General Order 

j 

95-2 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division of Columbus, filed a 

Report and Recommendation concerning the disposition of Ronald D. Leonard's 

("Plaintiff') complaint in this prisoner civil rights case. The Report and 

Recommendation recommended granting Defendant's unopposed motion for 

summary judgment, ECF No. 43. 

The Report and Recommendation notified the parties of their right to file 

objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b ). The Report and Recommendation 

further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the Report and 

Recommendation within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de 

novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the 

Case: 2:10-cv-00956-MHW-EPD Doc #: 46 Filed: 02/11/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
District Judge adopting the Report and Recommendation. Report and 

Recommendation 5, ECF No. 44. The deadline for filing such objections has 

passed, and no objections were filed. 

Having received no objections, the Report and Recommendation is 

adopted. Summary Judgment is granted for Defendant, ECF No. 43. The Clerk 

shall enter final judgment and terminate the case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

M CHAEL H. ATSON, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case: 2:10-cv-00956-MHW-EPD Doc #: 46 Filed: 02/11/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
ex10_1-6.htm


    


     

    Exhibit
10.1.6

     

    


     

    June 19,
2008

     

    


    
      	
              Steven
      Helmers, Esq.

            	
              Christopher
      Reitz, Esq.

            
	
              Black
      Hills Corporation

            	
              Aquila,
      Inc.

            
	
              625
      Ninth Street

            	
              20
      West Ninth Street

            
	
              Rapid
      City, SD 57709

            	
              Kansas
      City, MO 64105

            


    

     

    


    
      	
              Re:

            	
              Partnership
      Interests Purchase Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreement (collectively,
      the "Agreements") by and among Aquila, Inc. ("Aquila"), Black Hills
      Corporation ("Black Hills"), Great Plains Energy Incorporated ("Great
      Plains") and Gregory Acquisition Corp.
  ("Gregory")

            


    

     

    Dear
Steve and Chris:

     

    Under the
terms of the Agreements, as modified by those certain letters dated as of June
29, 2007, August 31, 2007, September 28, 2007, November 30, 2007, January 30,
2008, February 28, 2008, March 28, 2008, April 28, 2008, and May 29, 2008, Black
Hills, Aquila and Great Plains are to attach schedules setting forth Retained
Agreements and Shared Agreements prior to June 20, 2008.  We recognize
that this deadline may be implausible and therefore propose extending the date
set forth under section 2.2(1) and 8.5(d) of the Agreements to June 27,
2008.

    


    If you
are in agreement, please sign below on the attached signature page where
indicated and return a copy of this letter to me by fax or e-mail.

    


    


    
      	 
      	
              Very
      truly yours,

              Great
      Plains Energy Incorporated

            
	 
      	
               

              By:
      /s/ Mark G. English

              Name:
      Mark G. English

              Title:
      General Counsel

            


    

    
 

    
      
        

      



    


    ACKNOWLEDGED,
CONSENTED TO, AND ACCEPTED BY:

    


    BLACK
HILLS CORPORATION

    


    


    By:  /s/
Steven J. Helmers

    


    Name:   Steven
J. Helmers

    Title:     Sr.
Vice President and General Counsel

    


    


    AQUILA,
INC.

    


    


    By:  /s/
Chris Reitz

    


    Name:   Chris
Reitz

    Title:     General
Counsel

    


    


    GREGORY
ACQUISITION CORP.

    


    


    By:  /s/
Mark G. English

    


    Name:   Mark
G. English

    Title:     Secretary
and Treasurer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 4.3.1

                         AMENDMENT TO THE 1996 RPM, INC.
                         KEY EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION PLAN

         WHEREAS, RPM, Inc. (the "Company") adopted the 1996 RPM, Inc. Key
Employees Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") effective as of August 15, 1996; and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of
the Company has the right to amend the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company desires to amend the
Plan to increase the aggregate number of common shares of the Company for which
options may be granted under the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective July 19, 2000 as
set forth below; provided however, that this Amendment shall be of no force or
effect if it is not approved by the shareholders of the Company:

         The Plan is hereby amended by the replacing the first two sentences of
Section 6 with two new sentences to read as follows:

                  6. SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN. Subject to the provisions of
         Section 9 concerning payment for stock appreciation rights in Common
         Shares and subject to the provisions of the next succeeding paragraph
         of this Section 6, the aggregate number of Common Shares for which
         options may be granted under the Plan shall be Nine Million (9,000,000)
         Common Shares. The maximum number of Common Shares for which options
         may be granted under the Plan to any one person shall be Six Hundred
         Twenty Five Thousand (625,000) Common Shares.
#### Charles W. Bardeen, Resp’t, *v.*Jerome Allen *et al.,*App’lts.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
R

V

Q

J

E

D

S

T

F

G

I

H

K

C

B

P

O

A

M N

L

U

YAKIMA

COUNTY

KITTITAS

COUNTY

KLICKITAT

COUNTY

SKAMANIA

COUNTY

CHELAN

COUNTY

BENTON

COUNTY

DOUGLAS

COUNTY

GRANT

COUNTY

ADAMS

COUNTY

FRANKLIN

COUNTY

WALLA WALLA

COUNTY

ASOTIN

COUNTY

COLUMBIA

COUNTY

GARFIELD

COUNTY

WHITMAN

COUNTY

SPOKANE

COUNTY

LINCOLN

COUNTY

science for a changing world

EXPLANATION

COUNTY BOUNDARY

STUDY AREA BOUNDARY

STATE BOUNDARY

A

2

UPSTREAM BOUNDARY POINT OF THE SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE

SIGNIFICANCE ON A RIVER ( ) AND BOUNDARY OF UPSTREAM DRAINAGE BASIN—

Mean annual discharge is 200 cubic feet per second or the drainage area

is at least 300 square miles at the upstream boundary point.

UPSTREAM BOUNDARY POINT OF THE SHORELINE ON A STREAM ( )

AND BOUNDARY OF UPSTREAM DRAINAGE BASIN—-

Mean annual discharge is 20 cubic feet per second at the upstream boundary point.

WASHINGTON

Plate location

Base from U.S. Geological Survey digital data, l:500,000, 1983

Universal Transverse Mercator Projection, Zone 11

MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS OF UPSTREAM BOUNDARY POINTS ON SOUTHEASTERN WASHINGTON STREAMS AND RIVERS

UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971

By

Johnna L. Higgins

2003

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY

WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 03-4042

Upstream boundary point locations in southeastern WashingtonÐPLATE 1

Higgins, J.L., 2003, Determination of upstream boundary points on southeastern Washington streams and rivers under the requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971

0 10 20 30 40 50 MILES

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 KILOMETERS

4

7

6

9

10

8

5

3

2

88

99

97

98

86

92

91

83 81 87

94 93 96 95

82

90

84 89 85

80

79

71

73

78

77

74

76

68

65

69

70

75

66

67

72

64

53

50

28

49

55

54

33

58

59 42

35

32

24

31

46

43

21

48

57

56

22 39

40

41

25

47

26

27 52

61

63

60

51

34

36

30

44

29

62

38

37

45

23

19

20

15

1

14

18

17

16

13

12

11

107

129

119

147

118

143

115

113

120

111

116

135

106

105

136

126

144

139

134

112

114

128

148

117

131

145

127

125

138

130

122

110 146

140

142

150

123 109

149

121

137

108

124

141

132

104

102

101

100

133

103

N.F. Teanaway

R vi er

W.F. Teanawa y River

Teanaway

R

vi er

C el E ul m

River

Little Naches

River

Naches

River

American River

N.F. Tieton River

N.F. Ahtanum

Creek

M.F. Ahtanu m

S.F. Ahtanum

Creek

Rattlesnake Cree k

White

Salmon

Cre ek

Klickitat

River

Little Klickitat River

Ahtanum Creek

Toppenish Creek

Yakima

Rive r

Lower Crab Creek

COLUMBIA

R VI ER

Crab Creek

Rock

Creek

Touchet

River

Touchet River

Spokane

River

Hamgman

Creek

South

Fork

Palouse

River

Palouse

River

Palouse

River

Rock Creek

Tucannon River

Crab

Cre ek

Crab

Creek

SNAKE RIVER

COLUMBIA RIVER

Tucannon River

N.F. Touchet

River

Walla Walla River

Palouse River

S.F. Touchet River

COLUMBIA

RIVER

U N D E R G R O U N D

Yakima

River

COLUMBIA

RIVER

COLUMBIA

RIVER

COLUMBIA

RIVER
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Workforce diversity "working together to make a difference."

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Workforce diversity "working together to make a difference." 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Soil Conservation Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 91-760-P. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of Agriculture 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  146 × 36 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.8(b)



                                                  January 29, 2001


Mr. Richard Anders
J. Crew Group, Inc.
770 Broadway
New York, New York 10003


Dear Rich:

     In accordance with Paragraph 6 of the letter agreement dated April 18, 1999
(the "Agreement"), between J. Crew and yourself and in full satisfaction
thereof, J.Crew is paying you $1,000,000, less all applicable taxes.

     The above-described payment continues to be subject to your agreement to
immediately pay to J. Crew upon exercise of any of your J. Crew stock options an
amount equal to the difference between the fair market value per share of J.
Crew common stock on the exercise date for each such share acquired upon
exercise and the exercise price (up to an aggregate of $1,000,000).

     Please sign the enclosed copy of this letter to indicate your agreement.


                                                    Sincerely,


                                                    _________________________
                                                    David Kozel
                                                    Senior Vice President,
                                                    Human Resources

Accepted and Agreed:


________________________
Richard Anders

Dated: _________________
# C_2007183EN.01001902.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/19

---

Action brought on 23 May 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-249/07)

(2007/C 183/32)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and S.B. Noë, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by introducing a system of prior authorisation for oysters and mussels that come lawfully from other Member States, belong to species indigenous to the Netherlands and are intended to be planted in Netherlands coastal waters, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 and 30 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by introducing a system of prior authorisation for oysters and mussels that come lawfully from other Member States, belong to species indigenous to the Netherlands and are intended to be planted in Netherlands coastal waters, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 and 30 EC;

| — | order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Netherlands legislation prohibiting the planting, without prior authorisation, of oysters and mussels originating from other Member States impedes intra-Community trade and market access for oysters and mussels from other Member States.

This national rule cannot be justified.

---