alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 59111.

protests 207369-K, etc. (New York).

#### Schenley Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

*396Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE TAMPA
ELECTRIC COMPANY BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000096271
<NAME> TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        2,856
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          9
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             323
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           279
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,467
<COMMON>                                           119
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        1,029
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                324
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               790
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     105
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       55
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   1,045
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    3,467
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,254
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                78
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         984
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,062
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            192
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   2
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     194
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            59
<NET-INCOME>                                       135
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      135
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            95
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           30
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             307
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
I, Carl E. Vogel, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) [Reserved]; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and theaudit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004
/s/ Carl E. VogelCarl E. Vogel
|   | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Native American Energy Group, Inc. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 15, 2011       | /s/ Joseph G. D’Arrigo                          |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                     | Joseph G. D’Arrigo                              |
|                                                     | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Government Properties Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, NancyD. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1)              TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Date: November 15, 2004 | /s/ Nancy D. Olson           |   |
|-------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Nancy D. Olson               |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer  and |
|                    | Treasurer                    |

 

----
NUMBER 13-16-00691-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Per Curiam Order

Relator, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above 

cause on December 20, 2016. Through this original proceeding, relator seeks to compel 

the trial court to vacate its December 9, 2016 discovery order requiring relator to produce 

“confidential records concerning unrelated, non-party customers of [relator] that are 

protected from disclosure under . . . the [Texas] Finance Code” and requiring relator to 

“respond to overly broad discovery requests that seek information which is neither 

relevant nor calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” See TEX. FIN.

CODE ANN. § 59.006 (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). Relator has also filed an 
2

emergency motion for stay seeking to stay enforcement of the December 9, 2016 

discovery order until thirty days after disposition of this original proceeding.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the emergency motion for stay, 

is of the opinion that it should be granted in part and denied in part. This Court GRANTS 

the emergency motion, in part, and orders the December 9, 2016 discovery order to be 

STAYED with regard to the discovery requests that are the subject of this original 

proceeding: interrogatory numbers one, two, three, five, six, and seven, and request for 

production numbers four, five, six, and seven. This stay will remain in effect until the case 

is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order 

granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). All other relief 

sought by the emergency motion is DENIED. 

The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Rogelio Rodriguez and Daniela 

Rodriguez, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, 

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days 

from the date of this order. See id. R.52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

21st day of December, 2016.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE TAMPA
ELECTRIC COMPANY BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000096271
<NAME> TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        2,788
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          8
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             291
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           249
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,336
<COMMON>                                           119
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        1,007
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                291
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,417
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               690
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     164
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       85
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     980
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    3,336
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                          379
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                21
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         304
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         325
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             54
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      54
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            17
<NET-INCOME>                                        37
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       37
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            30
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           11
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             116
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 8765)

#### United States *v.*Holland Import Co. of Houston, Inc.

Entry Nos. 3687-H; 3254-H.

(Decided March 21, 1957)

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement, involving shipments of hardboard from Rotterdam, Holland, that were entered at the port of Houston, Tex., have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of the exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, is as follows:

> *608All items, Holland Florins 120.50 per hundred square meters, net, packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher export value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

On the agreed facts, I hold that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory-value for all the items is Holland Florins 120.50 per hundred square meters, net, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2007211EN.01002903.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/29

---

Action brought on 19 July 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-340/07)

(2007/C 211/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (1) or, in any event, by not communicating them to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (1) or, in any event, by not communicating them to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2002/73/EC expired on 5 October 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 269, p. 15.

1

---
['P J '2

~ r l3Mp:^|STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N ^ S FEDERA LAVIATIO NADMINISTRATIO N WASHINGTON , D.C
. VENIC EJE T CENTER , LLC , P ^ docke t No
. 16-09-0 5 Complainant , V
. CITY O FVENICE , FL , Respondent
. 

### NOTIC E O F CHANG E O F ADDRES S Pursuan t t o 1 4 CF R§ 16.13(f) , Attorne y for Responden t

City o f Venice , Florida , Arthu r

P
. Berg , hereb y submit s thi s Notic e o f Chang e o f

Address
. Effectiv e immediately , th e contac t informatio nfor

Mr
. Ber g i s a s follows : Arthu r P
. Ber g KAPLA N KIRSC H & ROCKWEL LLL P 44 5 Park Avenu e 9 * Floo r Ne w York , N Y 1002 2 Telephone : (212)836-404 8 Facsimile : 646-514-544 0 E-mail : aberg@kaplankirsch.co m Respectfull y submitte dthi s 11'* ^ da y o f November , 2009 :

Lis aA
. Reynolds ' KAPLA NKIRSC H & ROCKWEL LLL P 167 5 Broadway , Suit e 230 0 Denver , C O 8020 2CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E

I hereb y certif

y that I hav e thi s day serve datru e cop y o f th e foregoin g Notic e o f

Chang e of Addres s o n th e followin g partie s a t th e followin g addresse s thi s 11" ^ day o f November , 2009 : FA A Offic e o f

th e Chie f Counse l Part 1 6 Airport

Proceeding s Docket , AGC-61 0 Roo m92 5 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 Origina l an dThre e Copie s Vi aFedera l Expres s Numbe r 798 1 297 1 546 9 Gianluc aMorello , Esq
. Dominiqu e Pearlman , Esq
. Fowle r Whit e Boggs , P.A
. 50 1 E
. Kenned y Blvd. , Suit e 170 0 Tampa , F L3360 2 On e Cop y Vi aU.S
. Mai l ElizabethNewma n Offic e o f th e Chie f Counsel , Airport s an dEnvironmenta l Law Branc h Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , SW , Roo m923- M Washington , D C 2059 1 1 courtes y cop y Vi aU.S
. Mai l

Dan aL
. Loos e Kapla nKirsc h& Rockwel l LL P
EXHIBIT 31.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND RULE 15d-14(a)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I,
Mark L. Wetzel, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aviv REIT, Inc.;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                    
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Mark L. Wetzel                                                 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Mark L. Wetzel                                                     
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal
financial officer)
# C_2007158EN.01000102.xml

| 11.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4694 — RCI Banque/RFS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 158/02)

On 28 June 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4694. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4694. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---