alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007194EN.01000101.xml

| 22.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 August 2007

(2007/C 194/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3508 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 154,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4417 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68105 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3645 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6248 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,28 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9985 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,668 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 260,39 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8454 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2727 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,779 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8370 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6820 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4297 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5518 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9269 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0615 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 274,55 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9727 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2534 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3292 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 751,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7244 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,217 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,9220 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,385 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3508

JPY

Japanese yen

154,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4417

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68105

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3645

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6248

ISK

Iceland króna

90,28

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9985

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,668

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

260,39

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8454

RON

Romanian leu

3,2727

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,779

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8370

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6820

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4297

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5518

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9269

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0615

KRW

South Korean won

1 274,55

ZAR

South African rand

9,9727

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2534

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3292

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 751,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7244

PHP

Philippine peso

63,217

RUB

Russian rouble

34,9220

THB

Thai baht

44,385

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2007217EN.01000401.xml

| 15.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 September 2007

(2007/C 217/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,386 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 159,2 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4488 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68915 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2735 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6463 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,75 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,508 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,702 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7886 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3651 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,76 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7526 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6499 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4286 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7951 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9407 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0964 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 287,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9654 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4172 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,328 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 000,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8267 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,978 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,148 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,269 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,386

JPY

Japanese yen

159,2

DKK

Danish krone

7,4488

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68915

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2735

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6463

ISK

Iceland króna

89,75

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,508

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,702

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7886

RON

Romanian leu

3,3651

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,76

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7526

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6499

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4286

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7951

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9407

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0964

KRW

South Korean won

1 287,04

ZAR

South African rand

9,9654

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4172

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,328

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 000,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8267

PHP

Philippine peso

63,978

RUB

Russian rouble

35,148

THB

Thai baht

44,269

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of G2 Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 22, 2009 (the Report), I, Gust Kepler, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Gust Kepler            
|Gust Kepler                
|Principal Financial Officer
|April 22, 2009             

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,                2006,                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                period ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 355,                Inc. |

| By:    | */s/*   *Alex                Jen*Alex                JenChief                Executive OfficerChief                Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: | November                21, 2006 |
|--------|----------------------------------|
# C_2007199EN.01001401.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/14

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 May 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Würzburg, Germany) — Otmar Greser v Bundesagentür für Arbeit

(Case C-438/06) (1)

1

(Preliminary reference - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2007/C 199/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Sozialgericht Würzburg, Germany

Parties

Applicant: Otmar Greser

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesagentür für Arbeit

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sozialgericht Würzburg — Interpretation of Article 71(1)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 416) — Calculation of the unemployment benefits of a boatman on the Rhein (‘Rheinschiffer’) who was resident, during his last period of employment, on the territory of a Member State other than the State of employment and returned, in accordance with his contract of employment, only every second week to his place of residence — Classification of that worker as ‘a frontier worker’ or ‘a worker, other than a frontier worker’

Operative part of the order

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Sozialgericht Würzburg by decision of 28 September 2006 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
# C_2007235EN.01002002.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/20

---

Action brought on 6 August 2007 — Korsch v OHIM (PharmaCheck)

(Case T-296/07)

(2007/C 235/37)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Korsch AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by J. Grzam, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 June 2007 (Case R 358/2007-4) concerning the word mark No 5 310 214 ‘PharmaCheck’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 June 2007 (Case R 358/2007-4) concerning the word mark No 5 310 214 ‘PharmaCheck’;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘PharmaCheck’ for goods in Class 9 (Application No 5 310 214).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the registration.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejection of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1).

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 11, 14.1.1994, p. 1).

1

---
EX-10.30





EXHIBIT 10.30




Amendment No. 3 to the

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. 2003 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan




     Pursuant to the approval of the Board of Directors of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”)
on April 8, 2008 and the Company’s stockholders on May 21, 2008, the first sentence of Section 3 of
the Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. 2003 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated on July 29,
2004), as further amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto adopted on May 25, 2005 and Amendment No. 2
thereto adopted on March 20, 2008, is hereby amended to state as follows:


“The total number of shares of Common Stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan
shall be 1,135,000 shares.”



	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated: May 21, 2008 	ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Paul Elenio
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Paul Elenio 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Financial Officer
EX-23
    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors
GameZnFlix, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our independent
auditors' report dated March 28, 2005 on the consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, changes in stockholders' (deficit) and cash flows the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, included in GameZnFlix, Inc.'s
Form 10-KSB, into the Company's previously filed registration
statements on Form S-8 POS (File No. 333-105157).

/s/ Smith & Company
Smith & Company
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 30, 2005
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Mammograms: not just once, but for a lifetime: medicare helps pay for yearly mammograms

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Mammograms: not just once, but for a lifetime: medicare helps pay for yearly mammograms 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  National Cancer Institute (U.S.) 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  143 × 26 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  041242769.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Gina McCartjiy, Administrator 

.Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

washington, D. C. 20460 

Dear Ms. McCarthy: 

R^ 

-,^ 

m 

C ^ ^^

s--

— Y-- 

C- -^ , ..^ 

^r rn 

r C^ 

n ;- 

---^

pF LO Uf W ^,,., na ^s^ 

cONr^nsN^^ 

®A^ 

GLENN A. KOEPP 

SECRETARY

STATE OF LOUISIANA 

THE SENATE 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

P. O. BOX 94183 

BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA 70804 

PHONE (225) 342-5997 

FAX(225)342-1140 

KOEPPG@LEGIS.STATE.LA.US

Ma y 27, 2014 

Enclosed pjease find a cogrJ. of ,senate IResojution No. 151, which Ihave been instructed 

to forward to you. 

With &indest regards and be5t wishes, I am 

Sincere^ 

Cijenn oepp*

Secretar,y of the Senate 

GK/jw 

Enclosure
.^

S-213 (R/83)

Regular Session, 2014 

SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 151 

BY SENATOR GALLOT

O^ •L^Ul,^,. 

o ^

STr 

.	•^ 

00 ^°^-^^w 

^1'FIDE11 

ORIGINATED


IN THE 

SENATE 
SR NO. 151	 ENROLLED 

WHEREAS, new systems, such as the Enlist Weed Contro! System, provide longD	

term sustainability through innovative educat?.orl and training programs, research and 

^

	

development efforts, technology improvements acid. -M-f eld performance testing; and 

WHEREAS, Louisiana farmers need access to the newest innovative products in 

order to compete in the global marketplace. 

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the SPnate of the Legislature of Louisiana 

does hereby urge and request the Environmental Protection Agency and the United States 

Department of Agriculture to complete the approval process for certain new weed control 

system products. 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to the 

Environmental Protection Agency and the United States Department of Agriculture. 

PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE 

L

Page 2 of 2
LOUISIANA STATE SENATE 

P.O. BOX 94183


BATON ROUGE, LA 70804 

TO: 

^	Ciina McCarthy, Administrator 

Environmenta l Protection Agenc,g 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

Washington, D. C. 20460
(Reap. Dec. 8205)1

#### Pitman Publishing Corporation *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 713514 and 717220.

(Decided February 26, 1953)

*Jordan & Klingaman (Jacob L. Klingaman*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,.*special attorney), for the defendant.

1

 Known also as V. D. 2.

Rao, Judge:

The reappraisement suits listed above, which were consolidated for the purpose of trial, arose by reason of a judgment entered in the case of *Pitman Publishing Corporation*v. *United States,*28 Cust. Ct. 164, C. D. 1404, decided April 3, 1952, wherein and whereby it was- — ■

> * * * ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that these matters be and the same hereby are remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement, pursuant to the-provisions of § 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by § 16 (b) of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1501, now 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).

Section 2636 (d) of title 28 of the United States Code provides as-follows:

> If upon the hearing of a protest, the court declares an appraisement of merchandise made after the effective date of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 to-have been invalid or void, it shall remand the matter to a single judge who shall determine the proper dutiable value of such merchandise in the manner provided by this chapter. In such proceeding no presumption of correctness shall attach to the invoice or entered values.

The merchandise involved in these cases consists of ruled sheets of' ledger or journal paper imported in sets. Some of these sets are-comprised of 36 sheets of paper with two top covers and two bottom covers, the covers being designated on the invoices either as #101 stock or as #101 folder stock. The remaining sets here involved consist of 60 sheets of paper, and one top and one bottom cover of said folder stock. Each complete set was appraised as an entirety, those-containing 36 sheets at $140 per thousand sets, and those with 60-sheets at $209.40 per thousand sets.

This court having found the sheets and folder stock to fall within, separate classifications, carrying different rates of duty, it held that-the appraisements of the sets as entireties were invalid and void. A remand, pursuant to the provisions of section 2636 (d), *supra,*was. accordingly ordered.

*526At the trial counsel for the respective parties stipulated that the value of the top covers is $17 per thousand, that of the bottom covers $12 per thousand, and that the value of the paper is as originally fixed •by the appraiser less the values of the tops and bottoms.

In view of the stipulated facts, and upon the record before me, I bold that the value of top cover sheets of folder stock is $17 per thousand; that the value of bottom covers of folder stock is $12 per thousand; and the value of the sheets of ledger paper is as found by the ¡appraiser less the values of the top and bottom covers as hereinabove found.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 8733)

#### Ira G. Katz, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 807539, etc.

(Decided January 17, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have beep submitted *580for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States are the appraised values. There was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed, facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2

- 3C
NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: