alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies, in all      material respects, with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;    and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of      operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 8, 2009 | By:                | /s/ Tianfu      Yang |
|------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                   | Tianfu  Yang                 |
|                   | Chief Executive      Officer |
|                   |                         |
| Date: May 8, 2009 | By:                | /s/ Zedong      Xu   |
|                   | ZedongXu                     |
|                   | Chief Financial      Officer |

----
# C_2007170EN.01002403.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/24

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2007 — Gnemmi and Aguiar v Commission

(Case T-97/04) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Reports procedure - Career development review - 2001/2002 Appraisal exercise - Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly devoid of any legal basis)

(2007/C 170/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Laura Gnemmi (Hünsdorf, Luxembourg) and Eugénia Aguiar (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, and subsequently by F. Frabetti alone)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment, principally, of the 2001/2002 appraisal exercise in relation to the applicants and, alternatively, the applicants' career development reviews for that exercise.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and, for the rest, as manifestly devoid of any legal basis. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and, for the rest, as manifestly devoid of any legal basis.

| 2. | The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

1

---
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8919 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 151 Highway 74 South in Peachtree City, 

Georgia, as the ‘‘SFC Shawn McCloskey Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 8919 EH

1 SECTION 1. SFC SHAWN MCCLOSKEY POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 151 Highway 74 South in Peach4 tree City, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘SFC Shawn McCloskey Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘SFC Shawn McClos10 key Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8919 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMcCloskey Post Office’’. Peachtree City, Georgia, as the ‘‘SFC Shawn al Service located at 151 Highway 74 South in
Order filed, June 21, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 12

- 00246

- CV

____________
HUNTER BUILDINGS & M ANUFACTURING, L.P., HUNTER BUILDING, L.L.C., AND HUNTER B UILDINGS INTERNATION AL, L.L.C. , Appellant

V.

MBI GLOBAL , L.L.C. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008

- 50193



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 9, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P.
35.1. The court has not received a request to exte nd time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed
timely, we issue the following order.

We order Marcia Barnett , the official court reporter, to file the record in this
appeal wi thin 30 days of the date of this order

.
PER CURIAM
Superior Court of Buffalo.

Filed November 19, 1889.

#### Johann Reichel, Resp’t, *v.*The N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., App’lt.

Exceptions overruled and judgment ordered for plaintiff on verdict. Judge Titus did not sit in this case.
EX-32.1 CERTIFICATION




Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Report of Shang Hide Consultants, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marty Weigel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Dated: April 8, 2011







/s/ Marty Weigel


Marty Weigel


Principal Executive and Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6301]



[[Page 16710]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2006-24234; Airspace Docket No. 06-AWP-5]
RIN 2120-AA66


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Provo, UT

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This technical amendment corrects a final rule published in 
the Federal Register on August 1, 2006 (71 FR 43355), Docket No. FAA-
2006-24234, Airspace Docket No. 06-AWP-5. In that rule, the reference 
to FAA Order 7400.9 was published as FAA Order 7400.9O. The correct 
reference is FAA Order 7400.9P. This technical amendment corrects those 
errors.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, April 5, 2007. The Director of the Federal 
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR 
part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tameka Bentley, Airspace and Rules, 
Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone: (202) 267-8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On August 1, 2006, a final rule was published in the Federal 
Register, Docket No. FAA-2006-24234, Airspace Docket No. 06-AWP-5 that 
amended Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations part 71 by amending Class 
E Airspace; Provo, UT (71 FR 43355). In that rule, the reference to FAA 
Order 7400.9 was published as FAA Order 7400.9O. The correct reference 
is FAA Order 7400.9P.

Amendment to Final Rule

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the reference 
to FAA Order 7400.9 for Airspace Docket No. FAA-2006-24234, Airspace 
Docket No. 06-AWP-5, as published in the Federal Register on August 1, 
2006 (71 FR 43355), is corrected as follows:
0
On page 43355, column 1, (from the bottom, counting up) line 6, and 
column 2, (from the bottom, counting up) line 3, amend the language to 
read:


Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

* * * * *
    ``FAA Order 7400.9P'' instead of ``FAA Order 7400.9O''.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, March 23, 2007.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace and Rules.
[FR Doc. E7-6301 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
# C_2007199EN.01004401.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/44

---

Action brought on 29 June 2007 — ITT Manufacturing Enterprises v OHIM — ITT Trademark & Trade (I.T.T.)

(Case T-231/07)

(2007/C 199/83)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: ITT Manufacturing Enterprises Inc. (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: F. Delord, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ITT Trademark & Trade GmbH (Munich, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

The applicant requests the Court to:

| — | annul the contested decision, uphold decision No 565/2005 and order the defendant to pay the applicant's costs of this appeal; in the alternative |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, uphold decision No 565/2005 and order the defendant to pay the applicant's costs of this appeal; in the alternative

| — | alter the contested decision, uphold decision No 565/2005 and order the defendant to pay the applicant's costs of this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision, uphold decision No 565/2005 and order the defendant to pay the applicant's costs of this appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: ITT Trademark & Trade GmbH

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The Community word mark ‘ITT’ for goods and services in Class 7, 9, and 11 — application No 1152339

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: ITT Manufacturing Enterprises Inc.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The national figurative trade marks as well as non-registered wellknown trade marks used in the course of trade in the Community containing or consisting of the word element ‘ITT’ for goods and services in a large number of Classes

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant contests the Board's finding according to which the Opposition Division based its decision on an incorrect mark.

Pleas in law:

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2201** 

STARSHA SEWELL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JOHN HOWARD, SR. , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 8:12

- cv - 02736

- JFM )

Submitted : January 22 , 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Starsha Sewell , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court ’s order remanding for lack of jurisdiction and improper removal. A district court’s remand order is gener ally not reviewable on appeal or otherwise. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006). While an exception applies for civil rights cases removed pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1443 (2006), it requires the removal petitioner to allege: (1) the denial of a right arising und er federal law providing for specific civil rights stated in terms of racial equality, and (2) that she is denied or cannot enforce the specific federal rights in the state courts. Johnson v. Miss

. , 421 U.S. 213, 219 (1975). Because Sewell relies on 28 U .S.C.

§ 1983 (2006), a provision of general applicability, she cannot satisfy the first prong of Johnson

. See Ga. v. Rachel , 384 U.S. 780, 792 (1966). We therefore lack authority to review the district court’s remand order. We therefore deny Sewell’s motion for default judgment and dismiss the appeal . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First National Banc, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Roscoe H. Mullis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David G. Moffat, President and Chief Operating Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                             
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Roscoe H. Mullis                        
|    |  | Roscoe H. Mullis                            
|    |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer        
|    |  | August 16, 2004                             
|    | 
|    |  | /s/ David G. Moffat                         
|    |  | David G. Moffat                             
|    |  | President and Chief Operating Officer       
|    |  | (principal financial and accounting officer)
|    |  | August 16, 2004
# C_2007193EN.01000201.xml

| 21.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 August 2007

(2007/C 193/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3476 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 155,14 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4412 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67890 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3296 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6284 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,17 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9910 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,699 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 259,19 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6977 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8377 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2588 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,657 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8185 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6791 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4298 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5331 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9336 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0587 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 270,72 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9213 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2244 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3252 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 653,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7011 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,000 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,7560 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,220 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3476

JPY

Japanese yen

155,14

DKK

Danish krone

7,4412

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67890

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3296

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6284

ISK

Iceland króna

91,17

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9910

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,699

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

259,19

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6977

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8377

RON

Romanian leu

3,2588

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,657

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8185

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6791

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4298

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5331

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9336

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0587

KRW

South Korean won

1 270,72

ZAR

South African rand

9,9213

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2244

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3252

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 653,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7011

PHP

Philippine peso

63,000

RUB

Russian rouble

34,7560

THB

Thai baht

44,220

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Andrew Fitzmaurice, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Nord Anglia Education, Inc.; 

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

Date:  June 9, 2017

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Andrew Fitzmaurice         |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Andrew Fitzmaurice       |   |
|   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2



I, Christopher Doran, Chief Financial Officer of Doranetti Music Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Doranetti Music Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  June 20, 2006

/s/ Christopher Doran	Christopher Doran
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
### *As of March 31, 1995, the Social Security Administratio n

became an independent agency from the Department o f He althand Human Services. Therefore, the court ha s sub stituted Shirley S. Chater for Donna E. Shalal a pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c). The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrat e 1 

### Judge fo r the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case wa s referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ___________ No. 94-3252

___________ Richard Smith for Rachel Smith, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner * [UNPUBLISHED] of Social Security, * * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 29, 1995 Filed: December 4, 1995

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Richard Smith, on behalf of his minor daughter, Rachel Smith, a ppeals the district court's grant of summa ry judgment to the Commissioner in his 1 action seeking review of the Commissioner's deni al of child's supplemental security income benefits for Rachel. Having carefully reviewed the record , we conclude that no error of law appears, and that an opinion would lack precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

### -2- A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.