alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007267EN.01000901.xml

| 9.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 November 2007

(2007/C 267/07)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4666 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 165,90 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4548 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69625 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2620 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6601 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7410 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,894 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,34 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7017 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,6370 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4030 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,122 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7359 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5783 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3629 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3896 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8923 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1117 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 332,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5080 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,8832 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3365 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 396,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8845 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,284 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,8820 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,271 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4666

JPY

Japanese yen

165,90

DKK

Danish krone

7,4548

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69625

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2620

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6601

ISK

Iceland króna

87,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7410

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

26,894

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,34

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7017

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,6370

RON

Romanian leu

3,4030

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,122

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7359

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5783

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3629

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3896

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8923

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1117

KRW

South Korean won

1 332,70

ZAR

South African rand

9,5080

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,8832

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3365

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 396,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8845

PHP

Philippine peso

63,284

RUB

Russian rouble

35,8820

THB

Thai baht

46,271

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.2

SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Stockslager, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |     |  |                        
| |  | --- |  | -----------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark J. Stockslager
| |  |     |  | Mark J. Stockslager    
| |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

September 25, 2009
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*





In connection with the Annual Report of Matter of Time I Co.(the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), Mark E. Crone, the President, principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.





Date: March 31, 2011
By:
/s/ Mark E. CroneMark E. CronePresident (Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer)







*
This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**GAO-03-271**                      Published: Dec 17, 2002. Publicly Released: Jan 16, 2003.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

The electricity industry in the United States is undergoing major change, the outcomes of which will affect every consumer. The industry is restructuring from one where electricity prices are set by regulation to one in which competitive markets set the price. GAO was asked to report on the extent to which federal and state actions, to date, have achieved the goal of restructuring. GAO discusses lessons learned from efforts to date.

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

## Full Report

Highlights

Full Report (74 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Business Regulation and Consumer Protection

Best practicesElectric energyEnergy industryEnergy marketingFederal regulationsIndependent regulatory commissionsPrices and pricingElectricity restructuringElectricity marketLessons learned
(Reap. Dec. 10208)

#### Brier Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 736; 751; 882.

(Decided March 20, 1962)

*Isadore Paisner*for the plaintiff.

*William S. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Bici-iaRdsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by counsel for the parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the Schedule hereto annexed and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as the issues in *Paramount Import Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9697 and that the record in said ease may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise involved in the cases listed in the Schedule hereto annexed less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Czechoslovakia in. the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, packed ready for delivery, and that the foreign values of such or similar merchandise were no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER AGREED that these cases be, and the same are, submitted for decision upon the foregoing stipulation.

In the incorporated case, it was held that the amount paid a foreign commissionaire for services rendered in connection with the purchase of merchandise in the foreign market and which amount did not inure to the benefit of the seller was a buying commission, and, therefore, was not a part of the dutiable value of the merchandise.

On the agreed facts and following the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

December 30, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Environmental Organizations on Proposed Rule for Model Year 2017-

2025 Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards

FROM: Robin Moran, Senior Policy Advisor

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

This memo documents a meeting held on December 14, 2011 between representatives of several 

environmental organizations and EPA to discuss the proposed greenhouse gas emission 

standards for light-duty vehicles for model years 2017-2025. The meeting attendees from EPA 

included Margo Oge, Christopher Grundler, Chet France, William Charmley, Maureen Delaney, 

Steven Silverman, Jeff Alson, and Robin Moran.

The attendees from the environmental organizations included the following:

Ann Mesnikoff, Jesse Prentice-Dunn, Kesaaraa Wijeyewickrema - Sierra Club

Brendan Bell, Jim Kliesch - Union of Concerned Scientists

Shruti Vaidyanathan- American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy

Adam Rivera - Environment America

Luke Tonachel - National Resources Defense Council

Dan Becker- Safe Climate Campaign

Hillary Sinamon – Environmental Defense Council

The discussion topics included the organizations’ plans to submit public comments, the public 

hearings, and credit programs.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company to Acquire Real Estate of Albertson and Nelson.

— Order confirming report of commissioners and award of commissioners affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00556-CV

Charles Hofferber, Appellant

v.

Sharon Kerby and Wesley Kerby, Appellees

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 49024-3, HONORABLE GERALD M. BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Charles Hofferber filed a notice of bankruptcy with this Court

(bankruptcy filed in United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas, chapter 7, case number 05-

47484). Accordingly, his appeal is stayed. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (West 2004); Tex. R. App.

P. 8.2. Any party may file a motion to reinstate upon the occurrence of an event which allows

the case to proceed. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3(a). Failure to notify this Court of a lift of the

automatic stay or termination of the bankruptcy case may result in the dismissal of the cause for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Pemberton

Filed: February 23, 2006
# C_2007269EN.01002002.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de Prud'Hommes de Beauvais (France) lodged on 2 August 2007 — Olivier Polier v Najar EURL

(Case C-361/07)

(2007/C 269/41)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil de Prud'Hommes de Beauvais

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Olivier Polier

Applicant:

Defendant: Najar EURL

Defendant:

Question referred

Is Order No 2005-893 (1) of 2 August 2005, which allows dismissal during the consolidation period of two years provided for in the New Recruitment Contract (Contrat Nouvelle Embauche) without giving details as to the legitimacy of the termination and without prior information, valid in the light of:

1

| (1) | European law, as defined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which makes it clear that workers are entitled not to be dismissed without valid reason; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

European law, as defined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which makes it clear that workers are entitled not to be dismissed without valid reason;

| (2) | [Convention No] 158 of the International Labour Organisation concerning termination of employment; and |
| --- | --- |

(2)

[Convention No] 158 of the International Labour Organisation concerning termination of employment; and

| (3) | The European Social Charter? |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The European Social Charter?

---

(1)  Order No 2005-893 of 2 August 2005 concerning the ‘New Recruitment’ Employment Contract, JORF No 179, of 3 August 2005, p. 12689.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17592-17593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10840 and <greek-i> 10841]


New Mexico Disaster <greek-i> NM-00005

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of New Mexico ( FEMA-1690-DR), dated 04/02/2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 03/23/2007 through 03/24/2007.

[[Page 17593]]


EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/02/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/01/2007.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/02/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 04/02/2007, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):
    Curry, Quay.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only): New Mexico:
    De Baca, Guadalupe, Harding, Roosevelt, San Miguel, Union.
Texas:
    Bailey, Deaf Smith, Hartley, Oldham, Parmer.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere:..................      5.750
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere:...............      2.875
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere:..................      8.000
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
For Economic Injury:
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10840C 
and for economic injury is 108410.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-6639 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2103

RUFUS JULIUS CORNELIUS ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GREENVILLE HOSPITAL SYSTEM; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 

EMPLOYMENT AND WORKFORCE; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE BOARD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. 

(6:15-cv-02556-MGL)

Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rufus J. C. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rufus Julius Cornelius Anderson appeals the district 

court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination

complaint. The district court referred this case to a 

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). 

The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and 

advised Anderson that failure to file timely objections to this 

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court 

order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have 

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas 

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Anderson has waived appellate 

review by failing to timely file objections after receiving 

proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the 

district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Company's
Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      45,133,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               54,031,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   919,000
<INVENTORY>                                 62,556,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           170,547,000
<PP&E>                                     150,174,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              98,788,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             276,504,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       68,522,000
<BONDS>                                    122,421,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    764,000
<COMMON>                                    14,280,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,303,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               276,504,000
<SALES>                                     66,933,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            88,331,000
<CGS>                                       49,070,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               68,070,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,932,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                31,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,677,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,184,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   113,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,071,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,071,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>