alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# How to change a spare tire

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  How to change a spare tire 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. American Forces Information Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 92-204-P. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; 51; Defense billboard (1988) ; #51. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 46236.

#### Protests 43795-K, etc., of York St. Flax Spinning Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-372-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
(CIG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
May 1, 2007:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 13C
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 13D
Third Revised Sheet No. 13E

    CIG states that copies of its filing have been served to all firm 
customers, interruptible customers and affected state commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b4d4e594844656762656e587e7b7b64797f4b6d6e7968256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afe9eafdece0c1c3c6c1cafcdadfdfc0dddbefc9caddcc81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6568 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

GALINA RYTSAR,

Petitioner

v.

WALLACE BATEMAN, JR., JUDGE,

MARY SMITHSON, CLERK OF COURTS,

BUCKS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON

PLEAS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 50 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of July , 2019, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
No. 46255.

#### Protests 759712-G, etc., of Abad Esteve Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Carl Schrader, Resp’t, *v.*The Musical Mutual Protective Union, App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,*

*Filed January 24, 1890.)*

Appeal—Objection not taken at tbial cannot be baised.

An objection to the admission of a judgment roll in evidence without proof of its genuineness cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, as it could probably have been obviated if raised on the trial.

Appeal from a judgment recovered on the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*Alfred*Steckler, for app’lt; *August P. Wagener,*for resp’t.

Daniels, J.

The objections and exceptions taken in this case are for all practical objects the same as those considered in the case of *Merscheim*against the same defendant, with a very few unsubstantial differences. In this case it has been urged that the judgment roll was improperly received in evidence for the reason that no proof of its genuineness was given, all the papers offered was a judgment roll on file in the office of the clerk of the county of New York, and without that proof it should not have been received. A complete answer to these points is presented by the fact that the objections were in no manner mentioned upon the trial. If they had been, they might have been readily obviated by proof of the facts within the power of the plaintiff. The objections which were taken to the admission of the roll in evidence were that it was incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant, and not binding upon the defendant. There was not the slightest intimation given that any further proof could be required to authenticate the judgment and sustain the action of the court.

At the close of the case exceptions were taken to the charge of the court in several particulars. But as the charge was fully warranted by the evidence, and submitted what was controverted in the case as matters of fact fairly and wholly to the jury, these exceptions cannot be supported.

The rulings upon the material evidence were similar to those in the other action. No ground has been presented by them for questioning the correctness of the decisions which were made. And both the judgment and the order should be affirmed.

Van Beunt, P. J., and Beady, J., concur.
Fact Sheet Sept. 27, 2012

The Benefits of USCIS ELIS

Introduction

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is moving from a paper-based model to a secure, 

online environment. On May 22, we launched the foundational release of our new system, named the 

USCIS Electronic Immigration System (USCIS ELIS). 

The Benefits 

USCIS ELIS is a streamlined online account-based system that enhances customer service and the quality 

of our processes by enabling USCIS adjudicators to decide requests for immigration benefits online by 

accessing information submitted by the customer. Through USCIS ELIS, customers can view their benefit 

requests, receive electronic notification of decisions, and receive real-time case status updates. These 

improvements result in more complete, accurate and timely responses to customer requests.

The initial launch of USCIS ELIS included account setup and case management functions supporting the 

intake and adjudication of immigration benefits. Applicants are currently able to electronically file select 

categories of Form, I-539, Application to Extend or Change Nonimmigrant Status. USCIS will gradually 

expand USCIS ELIS to include more features, functions, and form types.

Similar to online banking, customer accounts provide a single electronic mechanism for submitting 

information and managing benefit requests. 

USCIS ELIS includes features such as:

A 24/7 online portal, allowing applicants a convenient and secure way to set-up and manage their 

account and submit and track their applications; 

Benefit requests and supporting documents can be submitted electronically;

Applicants and representatives can submit payment electronically; and

More specific and timely case status information can be accessed online.

To learn more about USCIS ELIS, including upcoming webinars and engagement opportunities, visit the 

USCIS website at www.uscis.gov/uscis-elis. Check back soon for the latest information on USCIS ELIS.

Feedback

A key component of this effort is obtaining input from key stakeholders, including customers, our 

employees and other federal partners. If you have a suggestion to improve USCIS ELIS, please email 

your feedback to uscis-elis-feedback@uscis.dhs.gov. Please do not send specific case or account related 

questions. If you have a technical issue or request, please call the USCIS National Customer Service 

Center at 1-800-375-5283 or 1-800-767-1833 (TDD for the hearing impaired).
# C_2007140EN.01001401.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep, Ghent lodged on 19 April 2007 — Criminal proceedings against Lodewijk Gysbrechts and Santurel Inter BVBA

(Case C-205/07)

(2007/C 140/23)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van Beroep, Ghent

Party to the main proceedings

Lodewijk Gysbrechts and Santurel Inter BVBA

Question referred

Does the Belgian Law of 14 July 1991 on commercial practices and the provision of information to and the protection of consumers constitute a measure having equivalent effect, as prohibited in Articles 28 to 30 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, inasmuch as Article 80(3) of that national law prohibits demands for an advance or for payment from the consumer during the compulsory period for withdrawal, as a result of which the actual effect of the Law of 14 July 1991 on the trading of goods in the trader's own country differs from its effect on trading with nationals of another Member State and does this give rise in fact to an obstacle to the free movement of goods, which is protected by Article 23 of the Treaty establishing the European Community?

---
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Task Group 9 Update

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Nick Bosco

NREL PV Module Reliability Workshop

February 25, 2014

Golden, Colorado

NREL/PR-5J00-62600
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

COMPARATIVE THERMAL CYCLING 

TEST FOR CPV MODULES TO 

DIFFERENTIATE THERMAL FATIGUE 

DURABILITY

NWIP submission

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Nick Bosco
3

Test Procedure

Thermal Cycling

Outdoor 

Exposure

Cell Evaluation

Cell Evaluation 10.1

10.2

10.3

10.1

Start

End

If intervals not complete
4

Test Procedure: Thermal Cycling

 110 to –40  ̊C with 5 minute dwell times

 Isc applied at 25 ̊C until end of hot dwell

 Maximum average ramp rate of 30  ̊C/min

 Number of cycles required depends on rate
5

Test Procedure: Thermal Cycling

 Test equivalency is ~5x qualification level

 Number of cycles required depends on rate

N. Bosco, T. Silverman, and S. Kurtz, "SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENT OF 

THERMAL FATIGUE IN THE CPV DIE ATTACH," in International Conference 

on Concentrating Photovoltaics (CPV-8), Toledo, SP, 2012.
6

Test Procedure: Thermal Cycling

 Motivation for increasing ramp rate....to a point.
7

Rating

NC: number of completed cycles

NR: number of required cycles, according to Equation (2)

The rating system is based on the qualification level of testing. 

The rating achieved is therefore reported in terms of multiples of the 

qualification level of thermal cycling.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9080 

To direct the Director of the United States Secret Service to implement 

a uniform fitness standard for Secret Service Special Agents and Uniformed Division Officers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2024 

Mr. BRECHEEN (for himself, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. OGLES, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. SELF, Ms. BOEBERT, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, Mr. 

DONALDS, Ms. TENNEY, Mrs. LUNA, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BOST, 

and Mr. MILLS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Director of the United States Secret Service 

to implement a uniform fitness standard for Secret Service Special Agents and Uniformed Division Officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secret Service Readi5 ness Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9080 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF A UNIFORM FITNESS STAND2 ARD FOR SECRET SERVICE SPECIAL AGENTS 

3 AND UNIFORMED DIVISION OFFICERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Secret 

6 Service shall implement sex-neutral fitness evaluation 

7 standards for Secret Service Special Agents and Uni8 formed Division Officers. These standards may not be 

9 lower than the existing fitness standards for male appli10 cants or current agents and officers. 

11 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days 

12 after the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Secret 

13 Service shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Secu14 rity of the House of Representatives and the Committee 

15 on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the 

16 Senate a report regarding the implementation of these 

17 standards. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Phone Record - October 26, 2010

EPA: Amy Bunker

RR Donnelly: Duane Okinaka

____________________________________________________________________

Mr. Okinaka spoke about challenges of printing color fuel economy labels, including concerns 

about color fading and the typical number of large printer trays.
EXHIBIT 35.1






SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT











I, Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), certify that:






(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Storm Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of August 18, 2010 between Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.






(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.















Date: March 29, 2011






Entergy Arkansas, Inc., as servicer




By:   /s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.


Name:    Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.


Title:      Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
# C_2007170EN.01002302.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/23

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 June 2007 — Mediocurso v Commission

(Joined Cases T-251/05 and T-425/05) (1)

1

(ESF - training programmes - Reduction in the assistance originally granted - Statement of reasons - Principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations - Absence of a manifest error of assessment)

(2007/C 170/44)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Mediocurso — Estabelecimento di Ensino Particular, SA (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by C. Botelho Moniz and E. Maia Cadete, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by P. Andrade and A. Weimar, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for the annulment of, first, Commission Decision C(2005) 1236 of 14 April 2005 reducing the assistance granted by Decision C(89) 0570 of 22 March 1989 and, secondly, Commission Decision C(2005) 3557 of 13 September 2005 reducing the assistance granted by Decision C(89) 0570 of 22 March 1989.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-251/05 and T-425/05 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-251/05 and T-425/05 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 3.9.2005.

1

---
Exhibit 32





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.





The undersigned, who are the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Franklin BSP Lending Corporation (the “Company”), each hereby certify as follows:





To the best of their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 17th day of March 2022





/s/ Richard J. ByrneRichard J. ByrneChief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman of the Board of Directors(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Nina Kang BaryskiNina Kang BaryskiChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**Certification**

 

In connection with the annual report of Lentuo International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)         the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: April 30, 2012

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Jianping Chen       |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Jianping Chen           |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

1

----
Case: 2:11-cv-00776-EAS-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 12/22/11 Page: 1 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00776-EAS-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 12/22/11 Page: 2 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00776-EAS-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 12/22/11 Page: 3 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00776-EAS-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 12/22/11 Page: 4 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T19:29:51-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
A89A0901.

#### WOMACK v. THE STATE.

(394 SE2d 801)

Decided May 4, 1990.

*The Garland Firm, Donald F. Samuel,*for appellant.

*Frank C. Winn, District Attorney,*for appellee.

Pope, Judge.

Our judgment in this case at 193 Ga. App. 186 (387 SE2d 336) (1989) has been reversed by the Supreme Court on certiorari. Womack *v. State,*260 Ga. 21 (389 SE2d 240) (1990). Accordingly, our judgment is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. The judgment of the trial court is reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Banke, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur.*