alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 28, 2015

NO. 03-15-00097-CR

Jason Lynn Lewis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
No. 46838.

#### Protest 51311-K of Ellis Silver Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial it was submitted without the introduction of evidence in support of the claims made. There being nothing in the record to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action the protest was overruled.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

KENNETH BARBOUR,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. C2-10-978

FEDERAL PRISONS, et al., JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE P. KEMP

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or

trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed February 9, 2011, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: February 9, 2011 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:10-cv-00978-EAS-TPK Doc #: 10 Filed: 02/09/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Before the First Division,

May 17, 1945

No. 50187.

#### Protests 963323-G, etc., of Brier Mfg. Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the beads in question are similar in "all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), certain of the items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503, and others at 20 percent under the same paragraph as modified by T. D. 49458.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

19–011 2003

108th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 108–40

REPORT ON THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF 

MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

A REPORT PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW 107–243 ENTITLED, ‘‘AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ 

RESOLUTION OF 2002’’

FEBRUARY 13, 2003.—Referred to the Committee on International 

Relations and ordered to be printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1)

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, February 13, 2003. 

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of 

Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–

243) and as part of my effort to keep the Congress fully informed, 

I am providing a report prepared by my Administration on matters 

relevant to that resolution including on matters relating to planning for post-liberation Iraq under section 7 of the Iraq Liberation 

Act of 1998 (Public Law 105–338). The report also discusses recent 

developments in the areas previously reported pursuant to section 

3 of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102–1) on our efforts to obtain compliance by 

Iraq with the resolutions adopted by the United Nations Security 

Council. 

Sincerely, 

GEORGE W. BUSH.

2


Insert offset folio 3 here HD40.001
3


Insert offset folio 4 here HD40.002
4


Insert offset folio 5 here HD40.003
5


Insert offset folio 6 here HD40.004
6


Insert offset folio 7 here HD40.005
7


Insert offset folio 8 here HD40.006
8


Insert offset folio 9 here HD40.007
9


Insert offset folio 10 here HD40.008
10


Insert offset folio 11 here HD40.009
11


Insert offset folio 12 here HD40.010
12


Insert offset folio 13 here HD40.011
13


Insert offset folio 14 here HD40.012
14


Insert offset folio 15 here HD40.013
15


Insert offset folio 16 here HD40.014
16


Insert offset folio 17 here HD40.015
# C_2007223EN.01000802.xml

| 22.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/8

---

Action brought on 2 August 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-368/07)

(2007/C 223/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Simonsson and E. Montaguti, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to draw up and adopt, in respect of each Italian port, waste reception and handling plans, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to draw up and adopt, in respect of each Italian port, waste reception and handling plans, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (1);

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the directive expired on 28 December 2002.

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 332, p. 81.

1

---
No. 61982.

#### Vita Food Products, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 131878-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of olives in brine similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Moscahlades Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 127, C. D. 1917), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2007155EN.01000501.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 May 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-359/06) (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/45/EC - Social policy - Worker protection - Use of work equipment - Minimum health and safety requirements)

(2007/C 155/07)

Language of the Case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Kreuschitz and I. Kaufmann-Bühler, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the necessary provisions to comply with Directive 2001/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001, amending Council Directive 89/655/EC concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment by workers at work (second individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (89/391/EEC)) (OJ 1989 L 393, p. 46)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions to comply with Directive 2001/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001, amending Council Directive 89/655/EEC concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment by workers at work (second individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (89/391/EEC)) regarding Burgenland and the Land of Carinthia, and with regard to the Land of Lower Austria, by not, at the very least, informing the Commission of the European Communities of those provisions within that period, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions to comply with Directive 2001/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001, amending Council Directive 89/655/EEC concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment by workers at work (second individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (89/391/EEC)) regarding Burgenland and the Land of Carinthia, and with regard to the Land of Lower Austria, by not, at the very least, informing the Commission of the European Communities of those provisions within that period, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 249 of 14.10.2006.

1

---
## Publications List

Series:State Court Sentencing of Convicted Felons

##   Use Search Filters  

### Select Filters

### Enter search criteria

### Sort by

State Court Sentencing of Convicted Felons, 2004 - Statistical TablesDate Published  July 2007SeriesState Court Sentencing of Convicted FelonsPublication TypeData Table

State Court Sentencing of Convicted Felons, 2002 - Statistical TablesDate Published  April 2005SeriesState Court Sentencing of Convicted FelonsPublication TypeData Table

State Court Sentencing of Convicted Felons, 2000 - Statistical SeriesDate Published  June 2003SeriesState Court Sentencing of Convicted FelonsPublication TypeData Table

State Court Sentencing of Convicted Felons, 1998 - Statistical TablesDate Published  December 2001SeriesState Court Sentencing of Convicted FelonsPublication TypeData Table

Profiling Felony Cases in the NACM NetworkDate Published  August 2001SeriesState Court Sentencing of Convicted FelonsPublication TypePublication

State Court Sentencing of Convicted Felons, 1996Date Published  February 2000SeriesState Court Sentencing of Convicted FelonsPublication TypePublication

State Court Sentencing of Convicted Felons, 1994Date Published  April 1998SeriesState Court Sentencing of Convicted FelonsPublication TypePublication

State Court Sentencing of Convicted Felons, 1992Date Published  May 1996SeriesState Court Sentencing of Convicted FelonsPublication TypePublication

## Side navigation

-  Just the Stats 
-  Search Publications 
-  Forthcoming Publications 
-  Research and Third-party Reports 
-  Data Corrections 

**Interested in Statistics?**

Sign up for email notices of new crime and justice statistical materials as they become available from BJS.

Subscribe
April 10, 1953

Reap. Dec. 8212.

#### The *American Import Co.*v. *United*States.

REHEARING MOTION GRANTED

Entered at San Francisco, Calif. [Not published.] Motion by plaintiff.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Innovative Product Opportunities Inc, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


DATE: March 30, 2012


/s/ Doug Clark
- -----------------------------------------
Doug Clark, Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Executive Officer, President,
Chairman of the Board and Director
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8219 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to assess the 

suitability and feasibility of designating certain land as the Lahaina 

National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2024 

Ms. TOKUDA (for herself, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. NEGUSE, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. 

CASE, Mr. HUFFMAN, and Mr. SABLAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study 

to assess the suitability and feasibility of designating 

certain land as the Lahaina National Heritage Area, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lahaina National Her5 itage Area Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8219 IH

1 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

4 of Hawaii. 

5 (3) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

6 means the census-designated place of Lahaina in 

7 Maui County in the State. 

8 SEC. 3. LAHAINA NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA STUDY. 

9 The Secretary, in consultation with State and local 

10 historic preservation officers, State and local historical so11 cieties, State and local tourism offices, and other appro12 priate organizations and governmental agencies, shall 

13 carry out, in accordance with section 120103(a) of title 

14 54, United States Code, a study to assess the suitability 

15 and feasibility of designating the study area as a National 

16 Heritage Area, to be known as the ‘‘Lahaina National 

17 Heritage Area’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Samuel J. Wohlstadter, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BioVerisCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Samuel J. Wohlstadter August 17, 2004Samuel J. Wohlstadter DateChairman and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (b)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Nathaniel F. Bradley IVNathaniel F. Bradley IVChairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)August 8, 2006/s/ Mark A. RedmanMark A. RedmanVice President  Finance andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)August 8, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2504-2505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-662]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-29-000]


City of Vernon, CA; Notice of Filing

January 11, 2007.
    Take notice that on December 28, 2006, City of Vernon, California 
filed revisions to its Transmission Revenue Balancing Account 
Adjustments for the calendar year of 2007, consistent with its 
Transmission Owner Tariff filed with the Commission in Docket No. EL00-
105-000, and with California Independent System Operator's 
Corporation's FERC Electric Tariff No. 7, Second Replacement 
Transmission Control Agreement.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2a4a7b0a1ad8c8e8b8c87b19792928d9096a284879081cc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aceae9feefe3c2c0c5c2c9ffd9dcdcc3ded8eccac9decf82cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

[[Page 2505]]

    Comment Date: 5 pm eastern time on January 18, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-662 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
April 23, 2001

Board of Directors
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
231 Washington Street
Newark, NJ 07102

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Statement of Additional Information filed as part of
Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the registration statement on Form N-4 for
The Prudential Qualified Individual Variable Contract Account (File No.2-80897).
In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons
whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.


                                                   Very truly yours,

                                                   SHEA & GARDNER

                                                   By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER E. PALMER
                                                      --------------------------
                                                       Christopher E. Palmer
No. 64251.

protests 322437-K, 328282-K, and 58/15314 (New York).

#### Charles R. Gracie & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Shoji panels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United Enterprises et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 73, C.D. 2023), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case Wo. 14,553.

#### UNITED STATES v. BEARNS.

[See Case No. 14,551a.]
# C_2007199EN.01003301.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/33

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 July 2007 — Au Lys de France v Commission

(Case T-458/04) (1)

1

(Competition - Dominant position - Market in the supply of sites for the operation of retail businesses at Roissy-Charles-de-Gaulle airport held by the operator Aéroports de Paris - Rejection of a complaint - Action for annulment - No Community interest)

(2007/C 199/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Au Lys de France SA (Raincy, France) (represented by: G. Lesourd, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: initially, P. Olivier and O. Beynet, and subsequently, P. Olivier, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Aéroports de Paris (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Calvert and O. Billard, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Action for annulment of the Commission's decision of 17 September 2004 to take no further action on the complaint brought by the applicant against the public undertaking Aéroports de Paris for breach of Article 82 EC (Case COMP/D3/38.666 Au Lys de France/Aéroports de Paris).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Au Lys de France SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Au Lys de France SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 45 of 19.2.2005.

1

---
Case: 2:10-cv-01165-JLG-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 12/09/11 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01165-JLG-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 12/09/11 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-07T14:25:21-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO