alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Axel G. Roehlig, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Northwest Passage Ventures, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b) Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition Rules
contained in SEC Release No. 33-8238;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing
the equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: September 10, 2004



By:  /s/ Axel G. Roehlig
         Axel G. Roehlig
         President, Chief Executive Officer,
         Chief Financial Officer, Principal
         Accounting Officer, and a member of
         the Board of Directors
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# As a courtesy to our patrons, this library is cooperating with IRS by providing federal tax forms

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  As a courtesy to our patrons, this library is cooperating with IRS by providing federal tax forms 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Publication ; 1364 (11-87)Publication (United States. Internal Revenue Service)1364. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019824848.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
1

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

April 16, 2012

PC Code: 129131

MEMORANDUM DP Barcode: 392472

SUBJECT: Fenpyroximate: Drinking Water Exposure Assessment for a Proposed New Use

on Corn and Proposed Label Amendments for Uses on Mint, Melons, Fruiting 

Vegetables, and Citrus in Texas

FROM: Greg Orrick, Environmental Scientist

ERB2/EFED (7507P)

THROUGH: James Lin, Environmental Engineer

Brian Anderson, Chief

ERB2/EFED (7507P)

TO: George Kramer, Ph.D., Senior Chemist

Dana Vogel, Chief

RAB1/HED (7509P)

Sidney Jackson, Risk Manager

Barbara Madden, Team Leader, RM Team 5

RIMUERB/RD (7505P)

Mark Suarez, Product Manager, RM Team 13

Marion Johnson, Chief

IB/RD (7505P)

The Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) has completed its drinking water 

exposure assessment for the proposed new use of fenpyroximate on corn (field, pop, silage, and 

seed; limited to States of California, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and 

Texas) and proposed label amendments to increase the maximum application rate per growing 

season for use on mint from 0.10 to 0.20 pounds of active ingredient per acre (lbs a.i./A) and to 

add aerial application as an option to uses on melons, fruiting vegetables, and citrus in Texas. 

Preliminary exposure modeling indicates that none of these proposed actions will result in higher 

exposure estimates than were calculated in the previous drinking water assessment (DP barcode 

391431; USEPA, 2012). Therefore, the results of the previous assessment (repeated in Table 1

and the following paragraph) remain unchanged for this assessment. For additional detail, please 

refer to the previous assessment.
2

Table 1. Maximum Screening Drinking Water Exposure Estimates for Current and 

Proposed Fenpyroximate Uses A

Source (Tier: Model) Use (Maximum Annual 

Rate)

Peak Exposure 

(μg/L)

Annual Mean 

Exposure (μg/L)

Surface water (Tier I: FIRST) Ornamentals (0.69 lbs a.i./A) 29 1.9

Surface water (Tier I: Cranberry model) Cranberries (0.20 lbs a.i./A) 43 8.6

Ground water (Tier I: SCI-GROW) Ornamentals (0.69 lbs a.i./A) ≤0.27

A Maximum values in bold.

A maximum screening exposure estimate in fish that may be consumed by humans was 

also calculated with the Provisional Cranberry Model and KABAM, at 30 mg/kg-bw (ww).

References

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012. Fenpyroximate: Drinking Water 

Exposure Assessment for Proposed New Uses on Snap Beans and Tropical Fruits 

including Avocado and a Proposed Outdoor Use on Cucumbers. DP barcode 391431. 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 

Prevention, Environmental Fate and Effects Division. Memorandum to the Health Effects 

Division and Registration Division. Jan. 23, 2012.
No. 46823.

#### Protest 42794-K of Barker Bros. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following •Abstract 46415 the table damask cloths in question were held not subject to countervailing duty.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 4.5


       Amendment to Employee Stock Purchase Plan Dated December 15, 2000
       -----------------------------------------------------------------


The Lennox International Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, is
hereby amended:

1.   The first paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

          "The Common Stock subject to issuance under the terms of the Plan
          shall be authorized but unissued shares, previously issued shares
          reacquired and held by Lennox or shares purchased on the open market.
          The aggregate number of shares that may be issued under the Plan shall
          not exceed 2,575,000 shares of Common Stock, which include the
          original 825,000 shares and an additional 1,750,000 shares added by
          this amendment. All shares purchased under the Plan, regardless of
          source, shall be counted against the 2,575,000 share limitation."

2.  Section 20 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

          "This Plan was adopted by the Board on September 11, 1998, and was
          previously amended by the Board on March 12, 1999, to be effective as
          of the Effective Date. The Plan is further amended, effective January
          1, 2001, by action of the Board on December 15, 2000, to increase the
          number of shares authorized to be issued hereunder. Notwithstanding
          the foregoing, the amendment of the Plan is expressly conditioned upon
          the approval by the holders of a majority of outstanding shares of
          Common Stock within 12 months of the date of Board approval of such
          amendment. If the stockholders of the Company should fail so to
          approve this Plan as amended, this Plan shall terminate and cease to
          be of any further force or effect and all purchases of shares of
          Common Stock under the Plan after December 31, 2000, shall be null and
          void."
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:David Thompson / Tucson, AZ 85710

I am requesting exemption to FAA UAS Section 333 for the following reason: To use my drone for commercial building, apartment complex, and real estate photography purposes.

The drone in which I will operate is manufactured by 'Yuneek' and is model # Q500 4K. It is FCC compliant, and I regularly practice flying the drone in UN-populated areas. The drone has 3 modes of control; manual, smart, and 

home modes. All of which are practiced frequently for operational safety. The drone has safety features built in to the controller and drone, such as low battery alert, visual cues in real-time, and a 'home' feature that when 

selected, will automatically return the drone to the ground location in which it started from.

I wish to use the drone for commercial aerial photography reasons only. At no time will I have the need to operate any more than 100' above ground. Many of my clients express the need to use the photographs for either assessing 

the condition of the roof, grounds, or for real estate listing purposes. Businesses, apartment complexes, home buyers and Realtor's will now have additional methods for making and assessing their potential or current 

investment.

There will never be a time that use of the drone is within 5 miles of any public/military airport, private events (Weddings, reunions, etc.) public or sporting events, natural or local landmark interests, or outside of the US.
Knowing public safety is paramount in operating this drone at all times, therefore frequent practice of operation of the drone is applied each and every time it leaves the ground, along with key safety features mentioned above.

Regards,

David Thompson
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8932 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.8932

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
   To establish an earlier application processing cycle for the FAFSA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``FAFSA Deadline Act''.
SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF EARLIER APPLICATION PROCESSING CYCLE.
    Section 483(d)(4) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1090(d)(4)) is amended by striking ``not later than January 1 of the 
applicant's planned year of enrollment, to the maximum extent 
practicable, on or around October 1 prior to the applicant's planned 
year of enrollment'' and inserting ``not later than October 1 prior to 
the applicant's planned year of enrollment''.
SEC. 3. CERTIFICATION AND TESTIMONY REQUIREMENTS.
    Section 483(d)(4) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1090(d)(4)) is further amended--
        (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the following:
            ``(A) In general.--The Secretary''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Certification and testimony requirements.--The 
        Secretary shall, with respect to each application processing 
        cycle, prior to the initiation of such processing cycle--
                ``(i) on a date that is not later than September 1--

                    ``(I) certify to the authorizing committees that 
                the Department will meet the October 1 deadline 
                specified in subparagraph (A) for such processing 
                cycle; or
                    ``(II) certify to such committees that the 
                Department will not meet such deadline; and

                ``(ii) in the case of a certification described in 
            clause (i)(II), on a date that is not later than September 
            30, testify before the authorizing committees on--

                    ``(I) the anticipated failure to meet such 
                deadline; and
                    ``(II) the financial impact such failure will have 
                on students and families.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHAD MARSHALL WILCOX,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 558 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

John W. McQueen, : 

Plaintiff, : Civil Action 2:11-cv-00082

v. : Judge Graham

Eric S. Brown

and Amy C. Stone, : Magistrate Judge Abel

Defendants, :

ORDER

Plaintiff John W. McQueen's April 23, 2012 motion to stay while he seeks review

of the March 9, 2011 judgment by the United States Supreme Court (doc. 14) is

DENIED. This is a closed case. Plaintiff’s request that the Supreme Court review the

judgment does not reopen this closed case.

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00082-JLG-MRA Doc #: 15 Filed: 04/24/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### Mary Costello, Resp’t, *v.*The Second Avenue R. R. Co., App’lt.

*George Washhourne Smith,*for resp’t; *Waldo Hutchins, Jr.,*for app’lt.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All’concur.
No. 61990.

#### J. H. Brown *v.*United States,

protests 206288-K, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared "or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2010-2 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2014 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2010, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2010-2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName:

Jennifer M. PoppTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
Reap. Dec. 8743.

#### Geo. *S. Bush & Co., Inc. et al.*v. *United States.*

Entered at Seattle, Wash., Boston, Mass, and Philadelphia, Pa. [Not published.] Motion by plaintiffs.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Michael W. Maurer, :

Petitioner :

 :

v. : No. 1032 C.D. 2017

 :

Workers' Compensation Appeal :

Board (Lion Mining Company), :

Respondent :

O R D E R

NOW, April 18, 2018, upon consideration of petitioner’s

application for reconsideration, the application is denied.

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
SED Srq ~ s

2~Ay~ ~ ~ 2 p ~ W O ~ Z Q

+r b~ q< PROS

~ G,\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

## OCT - 7 2014

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION 

### Ms. Ann Lee-Jeffs Director, Product Stewardship Honeywell International, Inc. 101 Columbia Road Morristown, New Jersey 07962 Re: Completeness Determination for SNAP submission for Solstice 1233zd for PU foams Dear Ms. Lee-Jeffs: Thank you for Honeywell's submission to the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA established the Significant New Alternatives Policy program to implement section 612 of the Clean Air Act. Your submission and the additional information received on March 4, 2014 have been reviewed for completeness. We have found the information to be complete. Here is a summary of information concerning your submission: Substitute name: Solstice 1233zd(E) Substances the substitute will replace: CFC-11, CFC-113, and HCFC-141b Sector: Foam Blowing End use: Flexible polyurethane foams Date TSCA SNAP Addendum received: December 30, 2013 Date most recent information received: March 4, 2014 Status of submission: Complete Based on review of the most recent information, your submission has been found complete. Before issuing a final decision on the acceptability of this substitute for use in the listed end use, we will review any public comments or other information that becomes available. If you have questions about your submission, please contact me at (202) 343-9161 or via email at landolfi.robert@epa.gov

. Si ly,



### Robert Landolfi Stratospheric Protection Division

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable . Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Mlnimum 30% Postconsumer)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

WILLIE CLIFTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10489

D.C. No. 

3:15-cr-00479-CRB-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 12, 2018** 

San Francisco, California

Before: HAWKINS, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Willie Clifton (“Clifton”) appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a

firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On appeal, Clifton argues that the

FILED

FEB 15 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

1

Officer Venzon properly searched Clifton incident to his arrest. An arrest

occurs when, considering the “totality of the circumstances,” a reasonable person

would have believed he or she was not free to leave after brief questioning.

Washington v. Lambert, 98 F.3d 1181, 1185 (9th Cir. 1996); see United States v.

Guzman–Padilla, 573 F.3d 865, 884 (9th Cir. 2009). After learning that Clifton’s

license was suspended, Officer Venzon ordered Clifton out of the car and handcuffed

him almost immediately, explaining that he was under arrest. Once handcuffed, a

reasonable person in Clifton’s circumstances would have believed “indefinite

custodial detention [was]inevitable.” Guzman–Padilla, 573 F.3d at 884 (citing Kraus

v. Pierce Cty., 793 F.2d 1105, 1109 (9th Cir. 1986)). The search that followed was

therefore lawful. See United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800, 802 (1974). 

That is so even if Clifton was not arrested until after the search. A search

incident to arrest need not precede the arrest; rather, the critical inquiry “is whether

the search is ‘roughly contemporaneous with the arrest.’” United States v. Smith, 389

1 The denial of a motion to suppress is reviewed de novo, but the factual

findings underlying the district court’s decision are reviewed for clear error. United

States v. McTiernan, 695 F.3d 882, 887 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing United States v.

Caseres, 533 F.3d 1064, 1067 (9th Cir. 2008)). 

2
F.3d 944, 951 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting United States v. McLaughlin, 170 F.3d 889,

892 (9th Cir. 1999)). Here, the arrest and search were not “so separated in time or by

intervening acts that the latter cannot be said to have been incident to the former.” Id.

(quoting McLaughlin, 170 F.3d at 893). Thus, the motion to suppress was properly

denied. 

AFFIRMED.

3