alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Volunteer: put your stamp on your community: National Volunteer Week, 1991

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Volunteer: put your stamp on your community: National Volunteer Week, 1991 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Action 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  024484278.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
1 The Honorable Daniel Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2873

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. Ryan J. Pflug, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 7, 2004 Filed: January 23, 2004

___________ Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ryan Pflug pleaded guilty to distributing marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The district court 1 sentenced him to 51 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release.-2- On appeal Pflug’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence was too harsh and that the district court failed to assure that a factual basis existed to support the felon-in-possession charge. These arguments, however, fall within the scope of an appeal waiver contained in Pflug’s plea agreement; Pflug voluntarily and knowingly entered into the plea agreement and the waiver; and enforcement of the waiver will not result in a miscarriage of justice. Accordingly, we enforce the waiver. See United States v. Woods , 346 F.3d 815, 817-18 (8th Cir. 2003). Having found in our independent review no nonfrivolous issues not covered by the waiver, see Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
#### American Express Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6625.

Entry No. 719695, etc.

Invoices dated Courtrai, Belgium, July 30, 1938, etc.

Certified August 1, 1938, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 22, 1938, etc.

(Decided December 16, 1946)

*Mary Rehan*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> . It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in Reappraisement Decision No. 6283, *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States,*and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved in each of the cases enumerated in the attached schedule, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, is the invoiced values in each case.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

Oh the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the invoiced values in each case.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2007211EN.01001602.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), lodged on 13 June 2007 — Bayerische Hypotheken- und Vereinsbank AG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-281/07)

(2007/C 211/31)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bayerische Hypotheken- und Vereinsbank AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (1) be applied to a claim for recovery of an export refund wrongly granted to an exporter, even if the latter did not commit an irregularity? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (1) be applied to a claim for recovery of an export refund wrongly granted to an exporter, even if the latter did not commit an irregularity?

1

If this question is to be answered in the affirmative:

| 2. | Must this provision be applied mutatis mutandis to a claim for recovery of such benefits from the party to which the exporter has assigned its claim to the export refund? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must this provision be applied mutatis mutandis to a claim for recovery of such benefits from the party to which the exporter has assigned its claim to the export refund?

mutatis mutandis

---

(1)  OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



Registrant (Commission File Number 333-110029):



Broder Bros., Co.

401 E. Hunting Park Ave

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19124



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Broder Bros., Co. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent Tyra, Chief Executive Officer of Broder Bros., Co., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broder Bros., Co.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



May 11, 2004



BRODER BROS., CO.By:

/s/    VINCENT TYRAVincent Tyra President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The meeting of the Manufacturing Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology scheduled for April 30, 2007, is cancelled. This meeting was announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 5, 2007 (72 FR 9767).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Victoria Ferretti-Aceto, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD-21), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane (for express delivery, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1093), Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-7001, FAX: 301-827-6776, e-mail:                         *victoria.ferrettiaceto@fda.hhs.gov*, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC area), code 3014512539. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting.                    

Dated: March 29, 2007.

Randall W. Lutter,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E7-6288 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Before the Third Division,

August 5, 1943

No. 48630.

#### Protest 707494-G of Sheffield Mills (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The proprietor of the importing company testified that the merchandise consisted of artificial silk viscose noils imported in bags; that each bag had a tag containing the marking “Made in France” and that the tags were attached to the burlap by wires which extended through the burlap and would not be removed when the bags were opened; that the covering was old burlap which was not in good condition; and further that there would 'be an *235objection to stenciling the marking on such burlap because the marking material would seep through the burlap and stain the noils. Exhibit 1, a tag taken from one of the bags, contained the marking “Made in France.” The examiner testified that no tags were attached to some of the bags in question and that the burlap was torn in some places with the noils visible. From the record it was apparent that the noils were not capable of being marked and that the tags were attached to the burlap in such manner that they would not be removed when the bags were opened. However, the evidence is conflicting as to whether all of the bags were so marked. The protest was therefore sustained as' to a portion of the bags found properly marked. *American Hatters & Furriers Co.*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 111, C. D. 31) cited.
# C_2007200EN.01000701.xml

| 28.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 August 2007

(2007/C 200/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3658 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 158,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4423 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67770 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3720 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6436 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,44 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9515 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,808 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6991 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8265 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,2404 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,718 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7969 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6425 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4327 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6602 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8870 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0764 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 282,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8111 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3260 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3255 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 811,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7578 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,715 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0479 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,753 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3658

JPY

Japanese yen

158,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4423

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67770

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3720

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6436

ISK

Iceland króna

87,44

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9515

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,808

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6991

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8265

RON

Romanian leu

3,2404

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,718

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7969

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6425

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4327

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6602

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8870

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0764

KRW

South Korean won

1 282,01

ZAR

South African rand

9,8111

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3260

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3255

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 811,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7578

PHP

Philippine peso

63,715

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0479

THB

Thai baht

44,753

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8979 

To clarify that the baseline is based on current laws and the assumption 

of continuation of current levels of discretionary appropriations, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2024 

Mr. CLINE (for himself and Mr. NORMAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To clarify that the baseline is based on current laws and 

the assumption of continuation of current levels of discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Bias in the Base5 line Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF BASELINE CALCULATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 257 of the Balanced 

8 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 

9 U.S.C. 907) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8979 IH

1 (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—For any budget year, the base4 line refers to a projection, based on current laws and the 

5 assumption of continuation of current levels of discre6 tionary appropriations, of current-year levels of new budg7 et authority, outlays, revenues, and the surplus or deficit 

8 into the budget year and the outyears based on laws en9 acted through the applicable date.’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (b)— 

11 (A) by striking paragraph (1) and insert12 ing the following: 

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Laws providing or creating 

14 direct spending and receipts are assumed to operate 

15 in the manner specified in those laws for each such 

16 year.’’; 

17 (B) by striking paragraph (2); and 

18 (C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 

19 paragraph (2); and 

20 (3) in subsection (c)— 

21 (A) in the second sentence of paragraph 

22 (1), by striking all that follows after ‘‘current 

23 year,’’ through the period and inserting ‘‘ex24 cluding resources designated as an emergency 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8979 IH

1 requirement and any resources provided in sup2 plemental appropriation laws.’’; 

3 (B) by striking paragraphs (2), (3), (4), 

4 and (5); 

5 (C) by redesignating paragraph (6) as 

6 paragraph (2); and 

7 (D) by inserting after paragraph (2) the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(3) NO ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—No 

10 adjustment shall be made for inflation or for any 

11 other factor.’’. 

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

13 (1) Section 202(e)(1) of the Congressional 

14 Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 602(e)(1)) is amend15 ed— 

16 (A) by inserting ‘‘and’’ before ‘‘(B) the lev17 els’’; and 

18 (B) by striking ‘‘, and (C)’’ and all that 

19 follows through ‘‘1985’’. 

20 (2) Section 403(a)(3) of the Social Security Act 

21 (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)) is amended— 

22 (A) by striking subparagraph (G); and 

23 (B) by redesignating subparagraph (H) as 

24 subparagraph (G). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20021 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ANTONIO LOPEZ JACOBO

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 218

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antonio Lopez

Jacobo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jacobo h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
December 6, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20021 Document: 00514750017 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2018No. 18

- 20021

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to w ithdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-20021 Document: 00514750017 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6848

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARCUS DWAYNE PARHAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:08-cr-00051-RLV-DCK-2; 5:11-cv00063-RLV)

Submitted: December 6, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Dwayne Parham, Appellant Pro Se. Kelli Hamby Ferry, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Dwayne Parham seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Parham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2



Registrant (Commission File Number 333-110029):



Broder Bros., Co.

Six Neshaminy Interplex, 6thFloor

Trevose, Pennsylvania 19053



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Broder Bros., Co. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 25, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Hollister, Chief Financial Officer of
Broder Bros., Co., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broder Bros., Co.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



August 9, 2005



BRODER BROS., CO.By:

/S/ DAVID J. HOLLISTERDavid J. HollisterChief Financial Officer




31