**UNITED
      STATES**


**SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**





**Washington,
      D.C. 20549**





**FORM
      10-Q**








*(Mark
      One)*


**[X]     
      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT
      OF 1934**





**For
      the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007**





**or**





**[  ]     
      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT
      OF 1934**





**For
      the transition period from ________ to _________**





**Commission
      file number:    333-111423**


**333-111423-01**





**CCH
      II, LLC ***


**CCH
      II Capital Corp. ***


*(Exact
      name of registrants as specified in their charters)*





******Delaware**
              **Delaware**
            **03-0511293**
              **13-4257703***(State
                or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
                organization)*
            *(I.R.S.
                Employer Identification
                Number)*





**12405
      Powerscourt Drive**


**St.
      Louis, Missouri  63131**


*(Address
      of principal executive offices including zip code)*





**(314)
      965-0555**


*(Registrants’
      telephone number, including area code)*





Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to
      be
      filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
      the
      preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were
      required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing
      requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [  ]





Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated
      filers, or non-accelerated filers. See definition of “accelerated filer and
      large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
      one):


Large
      accelerated filer oAccelerated
      filer oNon-accelerated
      filer þ





Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule
      12b-2 of the Act). Yes oNo þ





Number
      of
      shares of common stock of CCH II Capital Corp. outstanding as of August 10,
      2007: 1





*  CCH
      II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corp. meet the conditions set forth in General
      Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) to Form 10-Q and are therefore filing with the
      reduced disclosure format.





















**CCH
      II, LLC**


**CCH
      II Capital Corp.**


**Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the Period ended June 30, 2007**





**Table
      of Contents**





PART
                I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
            **Page**Item
                1. **Financial
                Statements - CCH II, LLC and Subsidiaries**Condensed
                Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007 and December 31,
                2006
            4Condensed
                Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and
                sixmonths
                ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
            5Condensed
                Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for thesix
                months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
            6Notes
                to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
            7Item
                2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
                Results of Operations
            16Item
                4. Controls and Procedures
            26PART
                II. OTHER INFORMATIONItem
                1. Legal Proceedings
            27Item
                1A.  Risk Factors
            27Item
                6. Exhibits
            32SIGNATURES
            S-1EXHIBIT
                INDEX
            E-1





This
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q is for the three and six months ended June
      30, 2007.  The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") allows
      us to "incorporate by reference" information that we file with the SEC, which
      means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you
      directly to those documents.  This information incorporates documents
      previously filed by our parent company, Charter Communications, Inc., with
      the
      SEC including its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
      30,
      2007, filed on August 2 ,2007.  Information incorporated by reference is
      considered to be part of this quarterly report.  In addition,
      information that we file with the SEC in the future will automatically update
      and supersede information contained in this quarterly report.  In this
      quarterly report, "we," "us" and "our" refer to CCH II, LLC and its
      subsidiaries.















**CAUTIONARY
      STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:**





This
      quarterly report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
      Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
      Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
      (the "Exchange Act"), regarding, among other things, our plans, strategies
      and
      prospects, both business and financial including, without limitation, the
      forward-looking statements set forth in the "Results of Operations" and
      "Liquidity and Capital Resources" sections under Part I, Item 2. "Management’s
      Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in
      this quarterly report.  Although we believe that our plans, intentions
      and expectations reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements
      are reasonable, we cannot assure you that we will achieve or realize these
      plans, intentions or expectations.  Forward-looking statements are
      inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions including, without
      limitation, the factors described under "Risk Factors" under Part II, Item
      1A.  Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this
      quarterly report may be identified by the use of forward-looking words such
      as
      "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "should," "planned," "will," "may," "intend,"
      "estimated," "aim," "on track," "target," "opportunity" and "potential" among
      others.  Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
      materially from the forward-looking statements we make in this quarterly report
      are set forth in this quarterly report and in other reports or documents that
      we
      file from time to time with the SEC, and include, but are not limited
      to:





·
            the
                availability, in general, of funds to meet interest payment obligations
                under our and our parent companies’ debt and to fund our operations and
                necessary capital expenditures, either through cash flows from operating
                activities, further borrowings or other sources and, in particular,
                our
                and our parent companies’ ability to be able to provide under the
                applicable debt instruments such funds (by dividend, investment or
                otherwise) to the applicable obligor of such
                debt;


·
            our
                and our parent companies’ ability to comply with all covenants in our and
                our parent companies’ indentures and credit facilities, any violation of
                which could trigger a default of our other obligations under cross-default
                provisions;


·
            our
                and our parent companies’ ability to pay or refinance debt prior to or
                when it becomes due and/or refinance that debt through new issuances,
                exchange offers or otherwise, including restructuring our and our
                parent
                companies’ balance sheet and leverage
                position; ·
            competition
                from other distributors, including incumbent telephone companies,
                direct
                broadcast satellite operators, wireless broadband providers, and
                DSL
                providers; ·
            difficulties
                in introducing and operating our telephone services, such as our
                ability
                to adequately meet customer expectations for the reliability of voice
                services, and our ability to adequately meet demand for installations
                and
                customer service;


·
            our
                ability to sustain and grow revenues and cash flows from operating
                activities by offering video, high-speed Internet, telephone and
                other
                services, and to maintain and grow our customer base, particularly
                in the
                face of increasingly aggressive
                competition; ·
            our
                ability to obtain programming at reasonable prices or to adequately
                raise
                prices to offset the effects of higher programming
                costs; ·
            general
              business conditions, economic uncertainty or slowdown;
              and ·
            the
              effects of governmental regulation, including but not limited to local
              and
              state franchise authorities, on our business.




All
      forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf
      are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary
      statement.  We are under no duty or obligation to update any of the
      forward-looking statements after the date of this quarterly report.








3





**PART
      I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION.**








**Item
                1.**
            **Financial
                Statements.**





**CCH
      II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**


**CONDENSED
      CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS**


**(DOLLARS
      IN
      MILLIONS)**





**June
                30,**
            
            
            **December
                31,****2007**
            
            
            **2006****(Unaudited)****ASSETS**CURRENT
                ASSETS:Cash
                and cash equivalents
            
            $
            34
            
            
            $
            32Accounts
                receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of$19
                and $16, respectively
            
            
            220
            
            
            
            194Prepaid
                expenses and other current assets
            
            
            20
            
            
            
            23Total
                current assets
            
            
            274
            
            
            
            249INVESTMENT
                IN CABLE PROPERTIES:Property,
                plant and equipment, net of accumulateddepreciation
                of $8,239 and $7,602, respectively
            
            
            5,088
            
            
            
            5,181Franchises,
                net
            
            
            9,201
            
            
            
            9,223Total
                investment in cable properties, net
            
            
            14,289
            
            
            
            14,404OTHER
                NONCURRENT ASSETS
            
            
            253
            
            
            
            201Total
                assets
            
            $
            14,816
            
            
            $
            14,854**LIABILITIES
                AND MEMBER’S EQUITY**CURRENT
                LIABILITIES:Accounts
                payable and accrued expenses
            
            $
            931
            
            
            $
            975Payables
                to related party
            
            
            140
            
            
            
            139Total
                current liabilities
            
            
            1,071
            
            
            
            1,114LONG-TERM
                DEBT
            
            
            11,966
            
            
            
            11,062LOANS
                PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY
            
            
            117
            
            
            
            108DEFERRED
                MANAGEMENT FEES – RELATED PARTY
            
            
            14
            
            
            
            14OTHER
                LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
            
            
            374
            
            
            
            362MINORITY
                INTEREST
            
            
            651
            
            
            
            641MEMBER’S
                EQUITYMember’s
                equity
            
            
            575
            
            
            
            1,552Accumulated
                other comprehensive income
            
            
            48
            
            
            
            1Total
                member’s equity
            
            
            623
            
            
            
            1,553Total
                liabilities and member’s equity
            
            $
            14,816
            
            
            $
            14,854







The
          accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
          financial statements.
 4






**CCH
      II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**


**CONDENSED****CONSOLIDATED
      STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS**


**(DOLLARS
      IN MILLIONS)**


**Unaudited**







**Three
                Months Ended June 30,**
            
            
            **Six
                Months Ended June 30,****2007**
            
            
            **2006**
            
            
            **2007**
            
            
            **2006**REVENUES
            
            $
            1,499
            
            
            $
            1,383
            
            
            $
            2,924
            
            
            $
            2,703COSTS
                AND EXPENSES:Operating
                (excluding depreciation and amortization)
            
            
            647
            
            
            
            611
            
            
            
            1,278
            
            
            
            1,215Selling,
                general and administrative
            
            
            317
            
            
            
            279
            
            
            
            620
            
            
            
            551Depreciation
                and amortization
            
            
            334
            
            
            
            340
            
            
            
            665
            
            
            
            690Asset
                impairment charges
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            99Other
                operating expenses, net
            
            
            1
            
            
            
            7
            
            
            
            5
            
            
            
            101,299
            
            
            
            1,237
            
            
            
            2,568
            
            
            
            2,565Operating
                income from continuing operations
            
            
            200
            
            
            
            146
            
            
            
            356
            
            
            
            138OTHER
                EXPENSES:Interest
                expense, net
            
            
            (256
            )
            
            
            (248
            )
            
            
            (506
            )
            
            
            (488
            )Other
                expense, net
            
            
            (31
            )
            
            
            (26
            )
            
            
            (38
            )
            
            
            (19
            )(287
            )
            
            
            (274
            )
            
            
            (544
            )
            
            
            (507
            )Loss
                from continuing operations before income taxes
            
            
            (87
            )
            
            
            (128
            )
            
            
            (188
            )
            
            
            (369
            )INCOME
                TAX BENEFIT (EXPENSE)
            
            
            1
            
            
            
            (2
            )
            
            
            (1
            )
            
            
            (4
            )Loss
                from continuing operations
            
            
            (86
            )
            
            
            (130
            )
            
            
            (189
            )
            
            
            (373
            )INCOME
                FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS,
              NET
                OF TAX
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            23
            
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            38Net
                loss
            
            $
            (86
            )
            
            $
            (107
            )
            
            $
            (189
            )
            
            $
            (335
            )








The
          accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
          financial statements.
 5






**CCH
      II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**


**CONDENSED
      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS**


**(DOLLARS
      IN MILLIONS)**


**Unaudited**





**Six
                Months Ended June 30,****2007**
            
            
            **2006**CASH
                FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net
                loss
            
            $
            (189
            )
            
            $
            (335
            )Adjustments
                to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating
                activities:Depreciation
                and amortization
            
            
            665
            
            
            
            698Asset
                impairment charges
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            99Noncash
                interest expense
            
            
            12
            
            
            
            16Deferred
                income taxes
            
            
            (3
            )
            
            
            --Other,
                net
            
            
            39
            
            
            
            27Changes
                in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions
                and
                dispositions:Accounts
                receivable
            
            
            (26
            )
            
            
            29Prepaid
                expenses and other assets
            
            
            2
            
            
            
            --Accounts
                payable, accrued expenses and other
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            (10
            )Receivables
                from and payables to related party, including deferred managementfees
            
            
            1
            
            
            
            1Net
                cash flows from operating activities
            
            
            501
            
            
            
            525CASH
                FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:Purchases
                of property, plant and equipment
            
            
            (579
            )
            
            
            (539
            )Change
                in accrued expenses related to capital expenditures
            
            
            (39
            )
            
            
            (9
            )Other,
                net
            
            
            31
            
            
            
            (5
            )Net
                cash flows from investing activities
            
            
            (587
            )
            
            
            (553
            )CASH
                FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Borrowings
                of long-term debt
            
            
            7,247
            
            
            
            5,830Repayments
                of long-term debt
            
            
            (6,338
            )
            
            
            (5,838
            )Repayments
                to related parties
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            (20
            )Proceeds
                from issuance of debt
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            440Payments
                for debt issuance costs
            
            
            (33
            )
            
            
            (29
            )Distributions
            
            
            (788
            )
            
            
            (314
            )Net
                cash flows from financing activities
            
            
            88
            
            
            
            69NET
                INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
            
            
            2
            
            
            
            41CASH
                AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
            
            
            32
            
            
            
            3CASH
                AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
            
            $
            34
            
            
            $
            44CASH
                PAID FOR INTEREST
            
            $
            506
            
            
            $
            451NONCASH
                TRANSACTIONS:Issuance
                of debt by Charter Communications Operating, LLC
            
            $
            --
            
            
            $
            37Retirement
                of Renaissance Media Group LLC debt
            
            $
            --
            
            
            $
            (37
            )Distribution
                of intercompany note to related party
            
            $
            --
            
            
            $
            (105
            )








The
          accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
          financial statements.
 6
 **CCH
          II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **NOTES
          TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 **(UNAUDITED)**
 **(dollars
          in millions, except where indicated)**




**1.   Organization
      and Basis of Presentation**




CCH
      II,
      LLC ("CCH II") is a holding company whose principal assets at June 30, 2007
      are
      the equity interests in its operating subsidiaries.  CCH II is a
      direct subsidiary of CCH I, LLC (“CCH I”), which is an indirect subsidiary of
      Charter Communications Holdings, LLC ("Charter Holdings").  Charter
      Holdings is an indirect subsidiary of Charter Communications, Inc.
      (“Charter”).  The condensed consolidated financial statements include
      the accounts of CCH II and all of its subsidiaries where the underlying
      operations reside, which are collectively referred to herein as the
      "Company."  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
      among consolidated entities have been eliminated.





The
      Company is a broadband communications company operating in the United
      States.  The Company offers to residential and commercial customers
      traditional cable video programming (analog and digital video), high-speed
      Internet services, advanced broadband services such as high definition
      television, Charter OnDemandTM, and digital video recorder service, and, in many
      of our markets, telephone service.  The Company sells its cable video
      programming, high-speed Internet, telephone, and advanced broadband services
      on
      a subscription basis.  The Company also sells local advertising on
      cable networks.





The
      accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have
      been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
      the
      United States for interim financial information and the rules and regulations
      of
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").  Accordingly,
      certain information and footnote disclosures typically included in CCH II’s
      Annual Report on Form 10-K have been condensed or omitted for this quarterly
      report.  The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
      are unaudited and are subject to review by regulatory
      authorities.  However, in the opinion of management, such financial
      statements include all adjustments, which consist of only normal recurring
      adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods
      presented.  Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results
      for a full year.




The
      preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
      generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
      and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
      and
      disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
      statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
      reporting period.  Areas involving significant judgments and estimates
      include capitalization of labor and overhead costs; depreciation and
      amortization costs; impairments of property, plant and equipment, franchises
      and
      goodwill; income taxes; and contingencies.  Actual results could
      differ from those estimates.




**2.           Liquidity
      and Capital Resources**





The
      Company incurred net losses of $86 million and $107 million for the three months
      ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $189 million and $335 million
      for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.  The
      Company’s net cash flows from operating activities were $501 million and $525
      million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
      respectively.





The
      Company's long-term financing as of June 30, 2007 consisted of $6.9 billion
      of
      credit facility debt and $5.1 billion accreted value of high-yield
      notes.  For the remaining two quarterly periods of 2007, none of the
      Company’s debt matures.  In each of 2008 and 2009, $65 million of the
      Company’s debt matures.  In 2010 and beyond, significant additional
      amounts will become due under the Company’s remaining long-term debt
      obligations.





The
      Company requires significant cash to fund debt service costs, capital
      expenditures and ongoing operations.  The Company has historically
      funded these requirements through cash flows from operating activities,
      borrowings under its credit facilities, equity contributions from its parent
      companies, sales of assets, issuances of debt securities, and cash on
      hand.  However, the mix of funding sources changes from period to
      period.  For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company generated
      $501 million of net cash flows from operating activities, after paying cash
      interest of $506 million.  In addition, the Company used approximately
      $579 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment.  Finally,
      the Company generated net cash flows from financing activities of $88
      million.






7
 **CCH
          II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **NOTES
          TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 **(UNAUDITED)**
 **(dollars
          in millions, except where indicated)**







The
      Company expects that cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities, and
      the
      amounts available under its credit facilities will be adequate to meet its
      and
      its parent companies’ cash needs through 2008.  The Company believes that
      cash flows from operating activities and amounts available under the Company’s
      credit facilities may not be sufficient to fund the Company’s operations and
      satisfy its and its parent companies’ interest and principal repayment
      obligations in 2009, and will not be sufficient to fund such needs in 2010
      and
      beyond.  The Company has been advised that Charter continues to work
      with its financial advisors concerning its approach to addressing liquidity,
      debt maturities, and overall balance sheet leverage.





***Credit
      Facility Availability***





The
      Company’s ability to operate depends upon, among other things, its continued
      access to capital, including credit under the Charter Communications Operating,
      LLC (“Charter Operating”) credit facilities.  The Charter Operating
      credit facilities, along with the Company’s indentures and the CCO Holdings, LLC
      (“CCO Holdings”) credit facilities, contain certain restrictive covenants, some
      of which require the Company to maintain specified leverage ratios, meet
      financial tests, and provide annual audited financial statements with an
      unqualified opinion from the Company’s independent auditors.  As of
      June 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the covenants under its
      indentures and credit facilities, and the Company expects to remain in
      compliance with those covenants for the next twelve months.  As of
      June 30, 2007, the Company’s potential availability under its revolving credit
      facility totaled approximately $1.4 billion, none of which was limited by
      covenant restrictions.  Continued access to the Company’s credit
      facilities is subject to the Company remaining in compliance with these
      covenants, including covenants tied to the Company’s leverage
      ratio.  If any event of non-compliance were to occur, funding under
      the credit facilities may not be available and defaults on some or potentially
      all of the Company’s and its parent companies’ debt obligations could
      occur.  An event of default under any of the Company’s debt
      instruments could result in the acceleration of its payment obligations under
      that debt and, under certain circumstances, in cross-defaults under its and
      its
      parent companies’ other debt obligations, which could have a material adverse
      effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of
      operations.





***Parent
      Company Debt Obligations***





Any
      financial or liquidity problems of the Company’s parent companies could cause
      serious disruption to the Company’s business and have a material adverse effect
      on the Company’s business and results of operations.  A failure by
      Charter Holdings, CCH I Holdings, LLC (“CIH”), or CCH I to satisfy their debt
      payment obligations or a bankruptcy with respect to Charter Holdings, CIH,
      or
      CCH I would give the lenders under the Company’s credit facilities the right to
      accelerate the payment obligations under these facilities.  Any such
      acceleration would be a default under the indenture governing the Company’s
      notes.  On a consolidated basis, the Company’s parent companies have a
      significant level of debt, which, including the Company’s debt, totaled
      approximately $19.6 billion as of June 30, 2007.





***Limitations
      on Distributions***





As
      long
      as Charter’s convertible notes remain outstanding and are not otherwise
      converted into shares of common stock, Charter must pay interest on the
      convertible senior notes and repay the principal amount in November
      2009.  Charter’s ability to make interest payments on its convertible
      senior notes, and, in 2009, to repay the outstanding principal of its
      convertible senior notes of $413 million, net of $450 million of convertible
      senior notes now held by Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC (“Charter
      Holdco”), will depend on its ability to raise additional capital and/or on
      receipt of payments or distributions from Charter Holdco and its subsidiaries.
       As of June 30, 2007, Charter Holdco was owed $4 million in intercompany
      loans from its subsidiaries and had $14 million in cash, which were available
      to
      pay interest and principal on Charter's convertible senior notes.  In
      addition, Charter has $25 million of U.S. government securities pledged as
      security for the semi-annual interest payments on Charter’s convertible senior
      notes scheduled in 2007.  On August 1, 2007, Charter Holdings distributed
      to CCHC, LLC (“CCHC”) an intercompany note issued by Charter Operating with an
      outstanding balance, including accrued interest, of $119 million.  On
      the same day, CCHC distributed such note to Charter Holdco along with $450
      million of Charter’s convertible senior notes and an investment account with $26
      million of cash.  As long as Charter Holdco continues to






8
 **CCH
          II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **NOTES
          TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 **(UNAUDITED)**
 **(dollars
          in millions, except where indicated)**






hold
      the
      $450 million of Charter’s convertible senior notes, Charter Holdco will receive
      interest payments from the government securities pledged for Charter’s
      convertible senior notes.  The cumulative amount of interest payments
      expected to be received by Charter Holdco is $40 million and may be available
      to
      be distributed to pay semiannual interest due in 2008 and May 2009 on the
      outstanding principal amount of $413 million of Charter’s convertible senior
      notes, although Charter Holdco may use those amounts for other
      purposes.





As
      of
      June 30, 2007, Charter Holdings, CIH, and CCH I had approximately $7.1 billion
      principal amount of high-yield notes outstanding with approximately $0, $188
      million, $34 million, and $6.9 billion maturing in 2008, 2009, 2010, and
      thereafter, respectively.  Charter Holdings, CIH, and CCH I will need
      to raise additional capital or receive distributions or payments from the
      Company in order to satisfy their debt obligations.  However, because
      of their significant indebtedness, the Company’s ability, and ability of its
      parent companies to raise additional capital at reasonable rates or at all
      is
      uncertain.  During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
      distributed $788 million of cash to its parent company.





Distributions
      by Charter’s subsidiaries to a parent company (including Charter, Charter
      Holdco, CCHC, Charter Holdings, CIH, and CCH I) for payment of principal on
      parent company notes, are restricted under the indentures governing the CIH
      notes, CCH I notes, CCH II notes, CCO Holdings notes, and Charter Operating
      notes and under the CCO Holdings credit facilities unless there is no default
      under the applicable indenture and credit facilities, and unless each applicable
      subsidiary’s leverage ratio test is met at the time of such
      distribution.  For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, there was no
      default under any of these indentures or credit facilities and each subsidiary
      met its applicable leverage ratio tests based on June 30, 2007 financial
      results.  Such distributions would be restricted, however, if any such
      subsidiary fails to meet these tests at the time of the contemplated
      distribution.  In the past, certain subsidiaries have from time to
      time failed to meet their leverage ratio test.  There can be no
      assurance that they will satisfy these tests at the time of the contemplated
      distribution.  Distributions by Charter Operating for payment of
      principal on parent company notes are further restricted by the covenants in
      its
      credit facilities.





Distributions
      by CIH, CCH I, CCH II, CCO Holdings, and Charter Operating to a parent company
      for payment of parent company interest are permitted if there is no default
      under the aforementioned indentures and CCO Holdings credit
      facilities.





The
      indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes permit Charter Holdings to
      make
      distributions to Charter Holdco for payment of interest or principal on
      Charter’s convertible senior notes, only if, after giving effect to the
      distribution, Charter Holdings can incur additional debt under the leverage
      ratio of 8.75 to 1.0, there is no default under Charter Holdings’ indentures,
      and other specified tests are met.  For the quarter ended June 30,
      2007, there was no default under Charter Holdings’ indentures, the other
      specified tests were met, and Charter Holdings met its leverage ratio test
      based
      on June 30, 2007 financial results.  Such distributions would be
      restricted, however, if Charter Holdings fails to meet these tests at the time
      of the contemplated distribution.  In the past, Charter Holdings has
      from time to time failed to meet this leverage ratio test.  There can
      be no assurance that Charter Holdings will satisfy these tests at the time
      of
      the contemplated distribution.  During periods in which distributions
      are restricted, the indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes permit
      Charter Holdings and its subsidiaries to make specified investments (that are
      not restricted payments) in Charter Holdco or Charter, up to an amount
      determined by a formula, as long as there is no default under the
      indentures.





***Recent
      Financing Transactions***





In
      March
      2007, Charter Operating entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
      (the “Charter Operating Credit Agreement”) which provides for a $1.5 billion
      senior secured revolving line of credit, a continuation of the existing $5.0
      billion term loan facility (which was refinanced with new term loans in April
      2007), and a $1.5 billion new term loan facility, which was funded in March
      and
      April 2007.  In March 2007, CCO Holdings entered into a credit
      agreement which consisted of a $350 million term loan facility funded in March
      and April 2007.  In April 2007, Charter Holdings completed a cash
      tender offer to purchase $97 million of its outstanding notes.  In
      addition, Charter Holdings redeemed $187 million of its 8.625% senior notes
      due
      April 1, 2009 and CCO Holdings redeemed $550 million of its senior floating
      rate
      notes due December 15, 2010.  These redemptions closed in April
      2007.  See Note 6.






9
 **CCH
          II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **NOTES
          TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 **(UNAUDITED)**
 **(dollars
          in millions, except where indicated)**






**3.   Sale
      of
      Assets**




In
      2006,
      the Company sold certain cable television systems serving a total of
      approximately 356,000 analog video customers in 1) West Virginia and Virginia
      to
      Cebridge Connections, Inc. (the “Cebridge Transaction”);  2) Illinois
      and Kentucky to Telecommunications Management, LLC, doing business as New Wave
      Communications (the “New Wave Transaction”) and 3) Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico
      and Utah to Orange Broadband Holding Company, LLC (the “Orange Transaction”) for
      a total sales price of approximately $971 million.  The Company used
      the net proceeds from the asset sales to reduce borrowings, but not commitments,
      under the revolving portion of the Company’s credit facilities.  These
      cable systems met the criteria for assets held for sale.  As such, the
      assets were written down to fair value less estimated costs to sell resulting
      in
      asset impairment charges during the six months ended June 30, 2006 of
      approximately $99 million related to the New Wave Transaction and the Orange
      Transaction.  The Company determined that the West Virginia and
      Virginia cable systems comprise operations and cash flows that for financial
      reporting purposes meet the criteria for discontinued
      operations.  Accordingly, the results of operations for the West
      Virginia and Virginia cable systems have been presented as discontinued
      operations, net of tax for the three and six months ended June 30,
      2006.





Summarized
      consolidated financial information for the three and six months ended June
      30,
      2006 for the West Virginia and Virginia cable systems is as
      follows:





**Three
                Months**
              **Ended
                June 30, 2006**
            
            
            **Six
                Months**
              **Ended
                June 30, 2006**Revenues
            
            $
            55
            
            
            $
            109Net
                income
            
            $
            23
            
            
            $
            38




**4. 
      Franchises and Goodwill**




Franchise
      rights represent the value attributed to agreements with local authorities
      that
      allow access to homes in cable service areas acquired through the purchase
      of
      cable systems.  Management estimates the fair value of franchise
      rights at the date of acquisition and determines if the franchise has a
      finite-life or an indefinite-life as defined by Statement of Financial
      Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, *Goodwill and Other Intangible
      Assets*.  Franchises that qualify for indefinite-life treatment
      under SFAS No. 142 are tested for impairment annually each October 1 based
      on valuations, or more frequently as warranted by events or changes in
      circumstances.  Franchises are aggregated into essentially inseparable
      asset groups to conduct the valuations.  The asset groups generally
      represent geographical clustering of the Company’s cable systems into groups by
      which such systems are managed.  Management believes such grouping
      represents the highest and best use of those assets.





As
      of
      June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, indefinite-lived and finite-lived
      intangible assets are presented in the following table:





**June
                30, 2007**
            
            
            **December 31,
                2006****Gross**
              **Carrying**
              **Amount**
            
            
            **Accumulated**
              **Amortization**
            
            
            **Net**
              **Carrying**
              **Amount**
            
            
            **Gross**
              **Carrying**
              **Amount**
            
            
            **Accumulated
                Amortization**
            
            
            **Net**
              **Carrying**
              **Amount****Indefinite-lived**
              **intangible
                assets:**Franchises
                with
              indefinite
                lives
            
            $
            9,187
            
            
            $
            --
            
            
            $
            9,187
            
            
            $
            9,207
            
            
            $
            --
            
            
            $
            9,207Goodwill
            
            
            64
            
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            64
            
            
            
            61
            
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            61$
            9,251
            
            
            $
            --
            
            
            $
            9,251
            
            
            $
            9,268
            
            
            $
            --
            
            
            $
            9,268**Finite-lived**
              **intangible
                assets:**Franchises
                with
              finite
                lives
            
            $
            23
            
            
            $
            9
            
            
            $
            14
            
            
            $
            23
            
            
            $
            7
            
            
            $
            16







10
 **CCH
          II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **NOTES
          TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 **(UNAUDITED)**
 **(dollars
          in millions, except where indicated)**






For
      the
      six months ended June 30, 2007, the net carrying amount of indefinite-lived
      franchises was reduced by $20 million, related to cable asset sales completed
      in
      the first six months of 2007.  Franchise amortization expense
      represents the amortization relating to franchises that did not qualify for
      indefinite-life treatment under SFAS No. 142, including costs associated with
      franchise renewals.  Franchise amortization expense for the three and
      six months ended June 30, 2007 was approximately $1 million and $2 million,
      respectively.  The Company expects that amortization expense on
      franchise assets will be approximately $3 million annually for each of the
      next
      five years.  Actual amortization expense in future periods could
      differ from these estimates as a result of new intangible asset acquisitions
      or
      divestitures, changes in useful lives and other relevant factors.





For
      the
      six months ended June 30, 2007, the net carrying amount of goodwill increased
      $3
      million as a result of the Company’s purchase of certain cable systems in
      Pasadena, California in June 2007.





**5.           Accounts
      Payable and Accrued Expenses**





Accounts
      payable and accrued expenses consist of the following as of June 30, 2007 and
      December 31, 2006:





**June
                30,**
              **2007**
            
            
            **December 31,**
              **2006**Accounts
                payable - trade
            
            $
            92
            
            
            $
            79Accrued
                capital expenditures
            
            
            58
            
            
            
            97Accrued
                expenses:Interest
            
            
            175
            
            
            
            190Programming
                costs
            
            
            283
            
            
            
            268Franchise-related
                fees
            
            
            52
            
            
            
            68Compensation
            
            
            66
            
            
            
            74Other
            
            
            205
            
            
            
            199$
            931
            
            
            $
            975




**6. 
      Long-Term Debt**




Long-term
      debt consists of the following as of June 30, 2007 and December 31,
      2006:





**June
                30, 2007**
            
            
            **December
                31, 2006****Principal
                Amount**
            
            
            **Accreted
                Value**
            
            
            **Principal
                Amount**
            
            
            **Accreted
                Value****Long-Term
                Debt**CCH
                II, LLC:10.250%
                senior notes due September 15, 2010
            
            $
            2,198
            
            
            $
            2,190
            
            
            $
            2,198
            
            
            $
            2,19010.250%
                senior notes due October 1, 2013
            
            
            250
            
            
            
            261
            
            
            
            250
            
            
            
            262CCO
                Holdings, LLC:Senior
                floating notes due December 15, 2010
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            550
            
            
            
            5508
                3/4% senior notes due November 15, 2013
            
            
            800
            
            
            
            795
            
            
            
            800
            
            
            
            795Credit
                facility
            
            
            350
            
            
            
            350
            
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            --Charter
                Communications Operating, LLC:8.000%
                senior second lien notes due April 30, 2012
            
            
            1,100
            
            
            
            1,100
            
            
            
            1,100
            
            
            
            1,1008
                3/8% senior second lien notes due April 30, 2014
            
            
            770
            
            
            
            770
            
            
            
            770
            
            
            
            770Credit
                facilities
            
            
            6,500
            
            
            
            6,500
            
            
            
            5,395
            
            
            
            5,395$
            11,968
            
            
            $
            11,966
            
            
            $
            11,063
            
            
            $
            11,062









11
 **CCH
          II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **NOTES
          TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 **(UNAUDITED)**
 **(dollars
          in millions, except where indicated)**






The
      accreted values presented above generally represent the principal amount of
      the
      notes less the original issue discount at the time of sale plus the accretion
      to
      the balance sheet date.  However, certain of the CCH II notes issued
      in exchange for Charter Holdings notes and Charter convertible notes in 2006
      are
      recorded for financial reporting purposes at values different from the current
      accreted value for legal purposes and notes indenture purposes (the amount
      that
      is currently payable if the debt becomes immediately due).  As of June
      30, 2007, the accreted value of the Company’s debt for legal purposes and notes
      indenture purposes is approximately $12.0 billion.





In
      March
      2007, Charter Operating entered into the Charter Operating Credit Agreement
      which provides for a $1.5 billion senior secured revolving line of credit,
      a
      continuation of the existing $5.0 billion term loan facility (the “Existing Term
      Loan”), and a $1.5 billion new term loan facility (the “New Term Loan”), which
      was funded in March and April 2007.  Borrowings under the Charter
      Operating Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable interest rate based
      on
      either LIBOR or a base rate, plus in either case, an applicable
      margin.  The applicable margin for LIBOR loans under the New Term Loan
      and revolving loans is 2.00% above LIBOR.  The revolving line of
      credit commitments terminate in March 2013.  The Existing Term Loan
      and the New Term Loan are subject to amortization at 1% of their initial
      principal amount per annum commencing on March 31, 2008 with the remaining
      principal amount of the New Term Loan due in March 2014.  The Charter
      Operating Credit Agreement also modified the quarterly consolidated leverage
      ratio to be less restrictive.





In
      March
      2007, CCO Holdings entered into a credit agreement (the “CCO Holdings Credit
      Agreement”) which consisted of a $350 million term loan facility (the “Term
      Facility”).  The Term Facility matures in September 2014 (the
“Maturity Date”).  Borrowings under the CCO Holdings Credit Agreement
      bear interest at a variable interest rate based on either LIBOR or a base rate
      plus, in either case, an applicable margin.  The applicable margin for
      LIBOR term loans is 2.50% above LIBOR.  The CCO Holdings Credit
      Agreement is secured by the equity interests of Charter Operating, and all
      proceeds thereof.





As
      part
      of the refinancing, the existing $350 million revolving/term credit facility
      was
      terminated.  The refinancing resulted in a loss on extinguishment of
      debt for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 of approximately $12
      million and $13 million, respectively, included in other expense, net on the
      Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.





In
      April
      2007, CCO Holdings redeemed $550 million of its senior floating rate notes
      due
      December 15, 2010.  The redemption resulted in a loss on
      extinguishment of debt for each of the three and six months ended June 30,
      2007
      of approximately $19 million included in other expense, net on the Company’s
      condensed consolidated statements of operations.





**7.           Loans
      Payable-Related Party**





Loans
      payable-related party as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consists of
      loans from Charter Holdco to the Company of $4 million and $3 million,
      respectively, and from Charter Holdings to the Company of $113 million and
      $105
      million, respectively.  These loans bear interest at a rate of LIBOR
      plus 3.0% reset quarterly.  These loans are subject to certain
      limitations and may be repaid with borrowings under the Company’s revolving
      credit facility.  In August 2007, the loan from Charter Holdings to
      the Company was distributed to CCHC.





**8.           Minority
      Interest**





Minority
      interest on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2007
      and December 31, 2006 represents preferred membership interests in CC VIII,
      LLC
      (“CC VIII”), an indirect subsidiary of CCH II, of $651 million and $641 million,
      respectively.  This preferred interest is held by Mr. Allen, Charter’s
      Chairman and controlling shareholder, and CCH I.  Minority interest in
      the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations includes the
      2%
      accretion of the preferred membership interests plus approximately 18.6% of
      CC
      VIII’s income, net of accretion.






12
 **CCH
          II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **NOTES
          TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 **(UNAUDITED)**
 **(dollars
          in millions, except where indicated)**






**9.   Comprehensive
      Loss**




The
      Company reports changes in the fair value of interest rate agreements designated
      as hedging the variability of cash flows associated with floating-rate debt
      obligations, that meet the effectiveness criteria of SFAS No. 133,
*Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities*, in
      accumulated other comprehensive income, after giving effect to the minority
      interest share of such gains and losses.  Comprehensive loss was $36
      million and $106 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
      respectively, and $142 million and $335 million for the six months ended June
      30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.




**10.   Accounting
      for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities**




The
      Company uses interest rate risk management derivative instruments, including
      but
      not limited to interest rate swap agreements and interest rate collar agreements
      (collectively referred to herein as interest rate agreements) to manage its
      interest costs.  The Company’s policy is to manage its exposure to
      fluctuations in interest rates by maintaining a mix of fixed and variable rate
      debt within a targeted range.  Using interest rate swap agreements,
      the Company has agreed to exchange, at specified intervals through 2013, the
      difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference
      to agreed-upon notional principal amounts.





The
      Company’s hedging policy does not permit it to hold or issue derivative
      instruments for trading purposes.  The Company does, however, have
      certain interest rate derivative instruments that have been designated as cash
      flow hedging instruments.  Such instruments effectively convert
      variable interest payments on certain debt instruments into fixed
      payments.  For qualifying hedges, SFAS No. 133 allows derivative gains
      and losses to offset related results on hedged items in the consolidated
      statement of operations.  The Company has formally documented,
      designated and assessed the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge
      accounting.  For each of the three months ended June 30,
      2007 and 2006, other expense, net includes $0, and for the six months ended
      June
      30, 2007 and 2006, other expense, net includes $0 and a gain of $2 million,
      respectively, which represent cash flow hedge ineffectiveness on interest rate
      hedge agreements.  This ineffectiveness arises from differences
      between critical terms of the agreements and the related hedged
      obligations.  Changes in the fair value of interest rate agreements
      that are designated as hedging instruments of the variability of cash flows
      associated with floating rate debt obligations, and that meet the effectiveness
      criteria of SFAS No. 133 are reported in accumulated other comprehensive
      income.  For the three months ended June 30,
      2007 and 2006, gains of $50 million and $1 million, respectively, and for the
      six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, a gain of $48 million and $0,
      respectively, related to derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges,
      were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.  The amounts
      are subsequently reclassified as an increase or decrease to interest expense
      in
      the same periods in which the related interest on the floating-rate debt
      obligations affects earnings (losses).





Certain
      interest rate derivative instruments are not designated as hedges as they do
      not
      meet the effectiveness criteria specified by SFAS No. 133.  However,
      management believes such instruments are closely correlated with the respective
      debt, thus managing associated risk.  Interest rate derivative
      instruments not designated as hedges are marked to fair value, with the impact
      recorded as other income (expense) in the Company’s condensed consolidated
      statements of operations.  For the three months ended June 30,
      2007 and 2006, other expense, net, includes gains of $6 million and $3 million,
      respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, other
      expense, net includes gains of $5 million and $9 million, respectively,
      resulting from interest rate derivative instruments not designated as hedges.





As
      of
June
      30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had outstanding $3.0 billion
      and $1.7 billion, respectively, in notional amounts of interest rate
      swaps.  The notional amounts of interest rate instruments do not
      represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, thus, are not a measure of
      exposure to credit loss.  The amounts exchanged are determined by
      reference to the notional amount and the other terms of the
      contracts.






13
 **CCH
          II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **NOTES
          TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 **(UNAUDITED)**
 **(dollars
          in millions, except where indicated)**







**11.           Other
      Operating Expenses, Net**





Other
      operating expenses, net consist of the following for the three and six months
      ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:





**Three
                Months**
              **Ended
                June 30,**
            
            
            **Six
                Months**
              **Ended
                June 30,****2007**
            
            
            **2006**
            
            
            **2007**
            
            
            **2006**Loss
                on sale of assets, net
            
            $
            --
            
            
            $
            --
            
            
            $
            3
            
            
            $
            --Special
                charges, net
            
            
            1
            
            
            
            7
            
            
            
            2
            
            
            
            10$
            1
            
            
            $
            7
            
            
            $
            5
            
            
            $
            10





Special
      charges, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 primarily
      represent severance associated with the closing of call centers and divisional
      restructuring.




**12.   Other
      Expense, Net**




Other
      expense, net consists of the following for the three and six months ended June
      30, 2007 and 2006:





**Three
                Months**
              **Ended
                June 30,**
            
            
            **Six
                Months**
              **Ended
                June 30,****2007**
            
            
            **2006**
            
            
            **2007**
            
            
            **2006**Gain
                on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
            
            $
            6
            
            
            $
            3
            
            
            $
            5
            
            
            $
            11Loss
                on extinguishment of debt
            
            
            (31
            )
            
            
            (27
            )
            
            
            (32
            )
            
            
            (27
            )Minority
                interest
            
            
            (5
            )
            
            
            (6
            )
            
            
            (10
            )
            
            
            (10
            )Gain
                (loss) on investments
            
            
            (1
            )
            
            
            5
            
            
            
            (1
            )
            
            
            4Other,
                net
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            (1
            )
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            3$
            (31
            )
            
            $
            (26
            )
            
            $
            (38
            )
            
            $
            (19
            )




**13.   Income
      Taxes**




CCH
      II is
      a single member limited liability company not subject to income
      tax.  CCH II holds all operations through indirect
      subsidiaries.  The majority of these indirect subsidiaries are
      generally limited liability companies that are also not subject to income
      tax.  However, certain of these limited liability companies are
      subject to state income tax.  In addition, the subsidiaries that are
      corporations are subject to federal and state income tax.





As
      of
      June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had net deferred income tax
      liabilities of approximately $197 million and $200 million,
      respectively.  The deferred tax liabilities relate to certain of the
      Company’s indirect subsidiaries, which file separate income tax
      returns.





During
      the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded $1 million
      of
      income tax benefit and $1 million of income tax expense, respectively, and
      during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded $2
      million and $4 million of income tax expense, respectively.





Charter
      Holdco, the Company’s indirect parent company, is currently under examination by
      the Internal Revenue Service for the tax years ending December 31, 2002 through
      2005.  In
      addition, Charter and one of the Company’s indirect corporate subsidiaries are
      under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the tax year ended
      December






14
 **CCH
          II, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **NOTES
          TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 **(UNAUDITED)**
 **(dollars
          in millions, except where indicated)**






31,
      2004.Management does not expect the results of these
      examinations to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated
      financial condition or results of operations.





**14. Contingencies**





The
      Company and its parent companies are defendants or co-defendants in several
      unrelated lawsuits claiming infringement of various patents relating to various
      aspects of its businesses.  Other industry participants are also
      defendants in certain of these cases, and, in many cases, the Company expects
      that any potential liability would be the responsibility of its equipment
      vendors pursuant to applicable contractual indemnification provisions. In the
      event that a court ultimately determines that the Company infringes on any
      intellectual property rights, it may be subject to substantial damages and/or
      an
      injunction that could require the Company or its vendors to modify certain
      products and services the Company offers to its subscribers.  While
      the Company believes the lawsuits are without merit and intends to defend
      the actions vigorously, the lawsuits could be material to the Company’s
      consolidated results of operations of any one period, and no assurance can
      be
      given that any adverse outcome would not be material to the Company’s
      consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or
      liquidity.





The
      Company and its parent companies are party to other lawsuits and claims that
      arise in the ordinary course of conducting its business.  The ultimate
      outcome of these other legal matters pending against the Company or its parent
      companies cannot be predicted, and although such lawsuits and claims are
      not expected individually to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
      consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, such
      lawsuits could have, in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the
      Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or
      liquidity.





**15.           Stock
      Compensation Plans**





Charter
      has stock option plans (the “Plans”) which provide for the grant of
      non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent
      rights, performance units and performance shares, share awards, phantom stock
      and/or restricted stock (not to exceed 20,000,000 shares of Charter Class A
      common stock), as each term is defined in the Plans.  Employees,
      officers, consultants and directors of Charter and its subsidiaries and
      affiliates are eligible to receive grants under the Plans.  Options
      granted generally vest over four years from the grant date, with 25% generally
      vesting on the anniversary of the grant date and ratably
      thereafter.  Generally, options expire 10 years from the grant
      date.  The Plans allow for the issuance of up to a total of 90,000,000
      shares of Charter Class A common stock (or units convertible into Charter
      Class A common stock).  During the three and six months ended June 30,
      2007, Charter granted 0.1 million and 3.9 million stock options, respectively,
      and 0.2 million and 6.9 million performance units, respectively, under Charter’s
      Long-Term Incentive Program.  The Company recorded $5 million and $3
      million of stock compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007
      and 2006, respectively, and $10 million and $7 million for the six months ended
      June 30, 2007 and 2006, which is included in selling, general, and
      administrative expense.







15




**Item
      2.  Management's
      Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
      Operations.**




**General**





CCH
      II,
      LLC ("CCH II") is a holding company whose principal assets at June 30, 2007
      are
      the equity interests in its operating subsidiaries.  CCH II is a
      direct subsidiary of CCH I, LLC (“CCH I”), which is an indirect subsidiary of
      Charter Communications Holdings, LLC ("Charter Holdings").  Charter
      Holdings is an indirect subsidiary of Charter Communications, Inc. (“Charter”).
      "We," "us" and "our" refer to CCH II and/or its subsidiaries.





We
      are a
      broadband communications company operating in the United States.  We
      offer our residential and commercial customers traditional cable video
      programming (analog and digital video, which we refer to as “video service”),
      high-speed Internet services, advanced broadband cable services (such as Charter
      OnDemandTM video service (“OnDemand”), high definition television service, and
      digital video recorder (“DVR”) service) and, in many of our markets, telephone
      service.  We sell our cable video programming, high-speed Internet,
      telephone, and advanced broadband services on a subscription basis.





The
      following table summarizes our customer statistics for analog and digital video,
      residential high-speed Internet and residential telephone as of June 30, 2007
      and 2006:





**Approximate
                as of****June
                30,**
            
            
            **June
                30,****2007
                (a)**
            
            
            **2006
                (a)****Video
                Cable Services:****Analog
                Video:**Residential
                (non-bulk) analog video customers (b)
            
            
            5,107,800
            
            
            
            5,600,300Multi-dwelling
                (bulk) and commercial unit customers (c)
            
            
            269,000
            
            
            
            275,800Total
                analog video customers (b)(c)
            
            
            5,376,800
            
            
            
            5,876,100**Digital
                Video:**Digital
                video customers (d)
            
            
            2,866,000
            
            
            
            2,889,000**Non-Video
                Cable Services:**Residential
                high-speed Internet customers (e)
            
            
            2,583,200
            
            
            
            2,375,100Telephone
                customers (f)
            
            
            700,300
            
            
            
            257,600





After
      giving effect to sales of certain non-strategic cable systems in the third
      quarter of 2006, January 2007 and May 2007, analog video customers, digital
      video customers, high-speed Internet customers and telephone customers would
      have been 5,439,800, 2,703,300, 2,252,500 and 257,600, respectively, as of
      June
      30, 2006.





(a)
            "Customers"
                include all persons our corporate billing records show as receiving
                service (regardless of their payment status), except for complimentary
                accounts (such as our employees).  At June 30, 2007 and 2006,
                "customers" include approximately 33,600 and 55,900 persons whose
                accounts
                were over 60 days past due in payment, approximately 4,000 and 14,300
                persons whose accounts were over 90 days past due in payment, and
                approximately 1,700 and 8,900 of which were over 120 days past due
                in
                payment, respectively.




(b)
              "Analog
                    video customers" include all customers who receive video
                    services.  (c)
                Included
                    within "video customers" are those in commercial and multi-dwelling
                    structures, which are calculated on an equivalent bulk unit ("EBU")
                    basis.  EBU is calculated for a system by dividing the bulk
                    price charged to accounts in an area by the most prevalent price
                    charged
                    to non-bulk residential customers in that market for the comparable
                    tier
                    of service.  The EBU method of estimating analog video customers
                    is consistent with the methodology used in determining costs
                    paid to
                    programmers and has been used
                    consistently.




(d)
            "Digital
                video customers" include all households that have one or more digital
                set-top boxes or cable cards
                deployed.






16





(e)
            "Residential
                high-speed Internet customers" represent those residential customers
                who
                subscribe to our high-speed Internet
                service.





(f)
            "Telephone
                customers" include all customers receiving telephone
                service.





**Overview**




For
      the
      three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, our operating income from continuing
      operations was $200 million and $146 million, respectively, and for the six
      months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, our operating income from continuing
      operations was $356 million and $138 million, respectively.  We had
      operating margins of 13% and 11% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
      2006, respectively, and 12% and 5% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
      2006, respectively.  The increase in operating income from continuing
      operations and operating margins for the three and six months ended June 30,
      2007 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was principally
      due to revenues increasing at a faster rate than expenses, reflecting increased
      operational efficiencies, improved geographic footprint, and benefits from
      improved third party contracts, coupled with asset impairment charges during
      the
      six months ended June 30, 2006, which did not recur in 2007.





We
      have a
      history of net losses.  Further, we expect to continue to report net
      losses for the foreseeable future.  Our net losses are principally
      attributable to insufficient revenue to cover the combination of operating
      expenses and interest expenses we incur because of our high level of debt,
      and
      depreciation expenses resulting from the capital investments we have made and
      continue to make in our cable properties.  We expect that these
      expenses will remain significant.




**Sale
      of Assets**




In
      2006,
      we sold cable systems serving a total of approximately 356,000 analog video
      customers for a total sales price of approximately $971 million.  We
      used the net proceeds from the asset sales to reduce borrowings, but not
      commitments, under the revolving portion of our credit
      facilities.  These cable systems met the criteria for assets held for
      sale.  As such, the assets were written down to fair value less
      estimated costs to sell resulting in asset impairment charges during the six
      months ended June 30, 2006 of approximately $99 million.  The results
      of operations for the West Virginia and Virginia cable systems have been
      presented as discontinued operations, net of tax for the three and six months
      ended June 30, 2006.









17






**RESULTS
      OF OPERATIONS**





***Six
      Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
      2006***





The
      following table sets forth the percentages of revenues that items in the
      accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations constituted for
      the
      periods presented (dollars in millions):





**Six
                Months Ended June 30,****2007**
            
            
            **2006**REVENUES
            
            $
            2,924
            
            
            
            100
            %
            
            $
            2,703
            
            
            
            100
            %COSTS
                AND EXPENSES:Operating
                (excluding depreciation and amortization)
            
            
            1,278
            
            
            
            44
            %
            
            
            1,215
            
            
            
            45
            %Selling,
                general and administrative
            
            
            620
            
            
            
            21
            %
            
            
            551
            
            
            
            20
            %Depreciation
                and amortization
            
            
            665
            
            
            
            23
            %
            
            
            690
            
            
            
            26
            %Asset
                impairment charges
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            99
            
            
            
            4
            %Other
                operating expenses, net
            
            
            5
            
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            10
            
            
            
            --2,568
            
            
            
            88
            %
            
            
            2,565
            
            
            
            95
            %Operating
                income from continuing operations
            
            
            356
            
            
            
            12
            %
            
            
            138
            
            
            
            5
            %OTHER
                EXPENSES:Interest
                expense, net
            
            
            (506
            )
            
            
            
            
            
            
            (488
            )Other
                expense, net
            
            
            (38
            )
            
            
            
            
            
            
            (19
            )(544
            )
            
            
            
            
            
            
            (507
            )Loss
                from continuing operations before income taxes
            
            
            (188
            )
            
            
            
            
            
            
            (369
            )INCOME
                TAX EXPENSE
            
            
            (1
            )
            
            
            
            
            
            
            (4
            )Loss
                from continuing operations
            
            
            (189
            )
            
            
            
            
            
            
            (373
            )INCOME
                FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX
            
            
            --
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            38Net
                loss
            
            $
            (189
            )
            
            
            
            
            
            $
            (335
            )





***Revenues***.  Average
      monthly revenue per analog video customer increased to $88 for the six months
      ended June 30, 2007 from $80 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily
      as a result of increases in digital, high-speed Internet and telephone
      customers, and incremental revenues from OnDemand, DVR, high-definition
      television services, and rate adjustments.  Average monthly revenue
      per analog video customer represents total quarterly revenue, divided by the
      number of respective months, divided by the average number of analog video
      customers during the respective period.






18





Revenues
      by service offering were as follows (dollars in millions):





**Six
                Months Ended June 30,****2007**
            
            
            **2006**
            
            
            **2007
                over 2006****Revenues**
            
            
            **%
                of**
              **Revenues**
            
            
            **Revenues**
            
            
            **%
                of**
              **Revenues**
            
            
            **Change**
            
            
            **%
                Change**Video
            
            $
            1,697
            
            
            
            58
            %
            
            $
            1,684
            
            
            
            62
            %
            
            $
            13
            
            
            
            1
            %High-speed
                Internet
            
            
            606
            
            
            
            21
            %
            
            
            506
            
            
            
            19
            %
            
            
            100
            
            
            
            20
            %Telephone
            
            
            142
            
            
            
            5
            %
            
            
            49
            
            
            
            2
            %
            
            
            93
            
            
            
            190
            %Advertising
                sales
            
            
            139
            
            
            
            4
            %
            
            
            147
            
            
            
            5
            %
            
            
            (8
            )
            
            
            (5
            )%Commercial
            
            
            164
            
            
            
            6
            %
            
            
            149
            
            
            
            6
            %
            
            
            15
            
            
            
            10
            %Other
            
            
            176
            
            
            
            6
            %
            
            
            168
            
            
            
            6
            %
            
            
            8
            
            
            
            5
            %$
            2,924
            
            
            
            100
            %
            
            $
            2,703
            
            
            
            100
            %
            
            $
            221
            
            
            
            8
            %





Video
      revenues consist primarily of revenues from analog and digital video services
      provided to our non-commercial customers.  Analog video customers
      decreased by 259,700 customers from June 30, 2006, 196,700 of which was related
      to asset sales, compared to June 30, 2007.  Digital video customers
      increased by 97,000, offset by a loss of 65,600 customers related to asset
      sales.  The increase in video revenues is attributable to the
      following (dollars in millions):





**2007
                compared to 2006**
              **Increase
                / (Decrease)**Rate
                adjustments and incremental video services
            
            $
            43Increase
                in digital video customers
            
            
            32Decrease
                in analog video customers
            
            
            (18
            )System
                sales
            
            
            (44
            )$
            13





High-speed
      Internet customers grew by 291,100 customers, offset by a loss of 39,600
      customers related to asset sales, from June 30, 2006 to June 30,
      2007.  The increase in high-speed Internet revenues from our
      non-commercial customers is attributable to the following (dollars in
      millions):





**2007
                compared to 2006**
              **Increase
                / (Decrease)**Increase
                in high-speed Internet customers
            
            $
            76Price
                increases
            
            
            33System
                sales
            
            
            (9
            )$
            100





Revenues
      from telephone services increased primarily as a result of an increase of
      442,700 telephone customers from June 30, 2006 to June 30, 2007.





Advertising
      sales revenues consist primarily of revenues from commercial advertising
      customers, programmers, and other vendors.  Advertising sales revenues
      decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in national advertising sales,
      including political advertising and as a result of decreases in advertising
      sales revenues from programmers.  For the six months ended June 30,
      2007 and 2006, we received $6 million and $10 million, in advertising sales
      revenues from programmers, respectively.





Commercial
      revenues consist primarily of revenues from cable video and high-speed Internet
      services provided to our commercial customers.  Commercial revenues
      increased primarily as a result of an increase in commercial video






19






and
      high-speed Internet revenues, offset by a decrease of $5 million related to
      asset sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007.





Other
      revenues consist of franchise fees, equipment rental, customer installations,
      home shopping, dial-up Internet service, late payment fees, wire maintenance
      fees and other miscellaneous revenues.  For the six months ended June
      30, 2007 and 2006, franchise fees represented approximately 50% and 53%,
      respectively, of total other revenues.  The increase in other revenues
      was primarily the result of increases in wire maintenance fees and late payment
      fees.





***Operating
      expenses*****.**  The increase in operating
      expenses is attributable to the following (dollars in millions):





**2007
                compared to 2006**
              **Increase
                / (Decrease)**Programming
                costs
            
            $
            47Costs
                of providing telephone services
            
            
            21Labor
                costs
            
            
            17Maintenance
                costs
            
            
            8Other,
                net
            
            
            5System
                sales
            
            
            (35
            )$
            63





Programming
      costs were approximately $781 million and $755 million, representing 61% and
      62%
      of total operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
      respectively.  Programming costs consist primarily of costs paid to
      programmers for analog, premium, digital, OnDemand, and pay-per-view
      programming.  The increase in programming costs is primarily a result
      of contractual rate increases.  Programming costs were also offset by
      the amortization of payments received from programmers in support of launches
      of
      new channels of $10 million and $9 million for the six months ended June 30,
      2007 and 2006, respectively.  System sales above include decreases in
      expense of approximately $21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007
      related to programming.  We expect programming expenses to continue to
      increase due to a variety of factors, including annual increases imposed by
      programmers, and additional programming, including high-definition and OnDemand
      programming, being provided to customers.





***Selling,
      general and administrative expenses.*****The increase in
      selling, general and administrative expenses is attributable to the following
      (dollars in millions):





**2007
                compared to 2006**
              **Increase
                / (Decrease)**Customer
                care costs
            
            $
            37Marketing
                costs
            
            
            35Employee
                costs
            
            
            15Other,
                net
            
            
            (8
            )System
                sales
            
            
            (10
            )$
            69





***Depreciation
      and amortization.*****Depreciation and amortization
      expense decreased by $25 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared
      to June 30, 2006, respectively, and was primarily the result of systems sales
      and certain assets becoming fully depreciated.





***Other
      operating expenses, net.***For the six months ended June
      30, 2007 compared to June 30, 2006, the decrease in other operating expenses,
      net is attributable to an $8 million decrease in special charges, offset by
      a $3
      million increase in losses on sales of assets.  For more information,
      see Note 11 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
      contained in “Item 1. Financial Statements.”





***Interest
      expense, net.*****For the six months ended June 30, 2007
      compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, net interest expense increased
      by $18 million, due to an increase in average debt outstanding from $10.9
      billion for the






20






six
      months ended June 30, 2006 to $11.4 billion for the six months ended June 30,
      2007, offset by a decrease in our average borrowing rate from 8.5% for the
      six
      months ended June 30, 2006 to 8.2% for the six months ended June 30,
      2007.





***Other
      expense, net.***The increase in other expense, net is
      attributable to the following (dollars in millions):




**2007
                compared to 2006**Increase
                (decrease) in gain on derivative instruments and hedgingactivities,
                net
            
            $
            (6
            )Increase
                in loss on extinguishment of debt
            
            
            (5
            )Increase
                in loss on investments
            
            
            (5
            )Other,
                net
            
            
            (3
            )$
            (19
            )





For
      more
      information, see Note 12 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
      statements contained in “Item 1. Financial Statements.”





***Income
      tax expense.*****Income tax expense was recognized
      through increases in deferred tax liabilities and current federal and state
      income tax expenses of our indirect subsidiaries.





***Income
        from discontinued operations, net of tax.***  Income from
        discontinued operations, net of tax decreased in the six months ended June
        30,
        2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 due to the sale of the
        West
        Virginia and Virginia systems in July 2006.  For more information, see Note
        3 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contained
        in
“Item 1. Financial Statements.”





***Net
      loss.*****Net loss decreased by $146 million, or 44%,
      for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June
      30,
      2006, as a result of the factors described above.





**Liquidity
      and Capital Resources**




***Introduction*******




This
      section contains a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources, including
      a discussion of our cash position, sources and uses of cash, access to credit
      facilities and other financing sources, historical financing activities, cash
      needs, capital expenditures and outstanding debt.




Our
      long-term financing as of June 30, 2007 consisted of $6.9 billion of credit
      facility debt and $5.1 billion accreted value of high-yield
      notes.  For the remaining two quarterly periods of 2007, none of our
      debt matures.  In each of 2008 and 2009, $65 million of our debt
      matures.  In 2010 and beyond, significant additional amounts will
      become due under our remaining long-term debt obligations.





Our
      business requires significant cash to fund debt service costs, capital
      expenditures and ongoing operations.  We have historically funded
      these requirements through cash flows from operating activities, borrowings
      under our credit facilities, equity contributions from our parent companies,
      sales of assets, issuances of debt securities and cash on
      hand.  However, the mix of funding sources changes from period to
      period.  For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we generated $501
      million of net cash flows from operating activities after paying cash interest
      of $506 million.  In addition, we used approximately $579 million for
      purchases of property, plant and equipment.  Finally, we had net cash
      flows provided by financing activities of $88 million.  We expect that
      our mix of sources of funds will continue to change in the future based on
      overall needs relative to our cash flow and on the availability of funds under
      our credit facilities, our and our parent companies’ access to the debt and
      equity markets, the timing of possible asset sales and based on our ability
      to
      generate cash flows from operating activities.  We continue to explore
      asset dispositions as one of several possible actions that we could take in
      the
      future to improve our liquidity, but we do not presently believe future asset
      sales to be a significant source of liquidity.





We
      expect
      that cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities, and the amounts
      available under our credit facilities will be adequate to meet our and our
      parent companies’ cash needs through 2008.  We believe that cash








21






flows
      from operating activities and amounts available under our credit facilities
      may
      not be sufficient to fund our operations and satisfy our and our parent
      companies’ interest and principal repayment obligations in 2009, and will not be
      sufficient to fund such needs in 2010 and beyond.  We have been
      advised that Charter continues to work with its financial advisors concerning
      its approach to addressing liquidity, debt maturities and its overall balance
      sheet leverage.





***Credit
      Facility Availability***





Our
      ability to operate depends upon, among other things, our continued access to
      capital, including credit under the Charter Communications Operating, LLC
      (“Charter Operating”) credit facilities.  The Charter Operating credit
      facilities, along with our indentures and the CCO Holdings, LLC (“CCO Holdings”)
      credit facilities, contain certain restrictive covenants, some of which require
      us to maintain specified leverage ratios and meet financial tests and to provide
      annual audited financial statements with an unqualified opinion from our
      independent auditors.  As of June 30, 2007, we were in compliance with
      the covenants under our indentures and credit facilities, and we expect to
      remain in compliance with those covenants for the next twelve
      months.  As of June 30, 2007, our potential availability under our
      revolving credit facility totaled approximately $1.4 billion, none of which
      was
      limited by covenant restrictions.  Continued access to our credit
      facilities is subject to our remaining in compliance with these covenants,
      including covenants tied to our leverage ratio.  If any event of
      non-compliance occur, funding under the credit facilities may not be available
      and defaults on some or potentially all of our and our parent companies’ debt
      obligations could occur.  An event of default under any of our debt
      instruments could result in the acceleration of our payment obligations under
      that debt and, under certain circumstances, in cross-defaults under our and
      our
      parent companies’ other debt obligations, which could have a material adverse
      effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of
      operations.





***Parent
      Company Debt Obligations***





Any
      financial or liquidity problems of our parent companies could cause serious
      disruption to our business and have a material adverse effect on our business
      and results of operations.  A failure by Charter Holdings, CCH I
      Holdings, LLC (“CIH”), or CCH I to satisfy their debt payment obligations or a
      bankruptcy with respect to Charter Holdings, CIH, or CCH I would give the
      lenders under our credit facilities the right to accelerate the payment
      obligations under these facilities.  Any such acceleration would be a
      default under the indenture governing our notes.  On a consolidated
      basis, our parent companies have a significant level of debt, which, including
      our debt, totaled approximately $19.6 billion as of June 30, 2007.





***Limitations
      on Distributions***





As
      long
      as Charter’s convertible notes remain outstanding and are not otherwise
      converted into shares of common stock, Charter must pay interest on the
      convertible senior notes and repay the principal amount in November
      2009.  Charter’s ability to make interest payments on its convertible
      senior notes, and, in 2009, to repay the outstanding principal of its
      convertible senior notes of $413 million, net of $450 million of convertible
      senior notes now held by Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC (“Charter
      Holdco”), will depend on its ability to raise additional capital and/or on
      receipt of payments or distributions from Charter Holdco and its subsidiaries.
       As of June 30, 2007, Charter Holdco was owed $4 million in intercompany
      loans from its subsidiaries and had $14 million in cash, which were available
      to
      pay interest and principal on Charter's convertible senior notes.  In
      addition, Charter has $25 million of U.S. government securities pledged as
      security for the semi-annual interest payments on Charter’s convertible senior
      notes scheduled in 2007.   On August 1, 2007, Charter Holdings
      distributed to CCHC, LLC (“CCHC”) an intercompany note issued by Charter
      Operating with an outstanding balance, including accrued interest, of $119
      million.  On the same day, CCHC distributed such note to Charter
      Holdco along with $450 million of Charter’s convertible senior note and an
      investment account with $26 million of cash.  As long as Charter
      Holdco continues to hold the $450 million of Charter’s convertible senior notes,
      Charter Holdco will receive interest payments from the government securities
      pledged for the convertible senior notes.  The cumulative amount of
      interest payments expected to be received by Charter Holdco is $40 million
      and
      may be available to be distributed to pay semiannual interest due in 2008 and
      May 2009 on the outstanding principal amount of $413 million of Charter’s
      convertible senior notes, although Charter Holdco may use those amounts for
      other purposes.





As
      of
      June 30, 2007, Charter Holdings, CIH, and CCH I had approximately $7.1 billion
      principal amount of high-yield notes outstanding with approximately $0, $188
      million, $34 million, and $6.9 billion maturing in 2008, 2009, 2010, and
      thereafter, respectively.  Charter Holdings, CIH, and CCH I will need
      to raise additional capital or receive








22






distributions
      or payments from the Company in order to satisfy their debt
      obligations.  However, because of their significant indebtedness, the
      Company’s ability, and ability of the parent companies to raise additional
      capital at reasonable rates or at all is uncertain.  During the six
      months ended June 30, 2007, we distributed $788 million of cash to our parent
      company.





Distributions
      by Charter’s subsidiaries to a parent company (including Charter, Charter Holdco
      CCHC, Charter Holdings, CIH, and CCH I) for payment of principal on parent
      company notes, are restricted under the indentures governing the CIH notes,
      CCH I notes, CCH II notes, CCO Holdings notes, and Charter Operating notes
      and
      under the CCO Holdings credit facilities unless there is no default under the
      applicable indenture and credit facilities, and unless each applicable
      subsidiary’s leverage ratio test is met at the time of such
      distribution. For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, there was no default
      under any of these indentures or credit facilities and each subsidiary met
      its
      applicable leverage ratio tests based on June 30, 2007 financial
      results.  Such distributions would be restricted, however, if any such
      subsidiary fails to meet these tests at the time of the contemplated
      distribution.  In the past, certain subsidiaries have from time to
      time failed to meet their leverage ratio test.  There can be no
      assurance that they will satisfy these tests at the time of the contemplated
      distribution.  Distributions by Charter Operating for payment of
      principal on parent company notes are further restricted by the covenants in
      its
      credit facilities.





Distributions
      by CIH, CCH I, CCH II, CCO Holdings and Charter Operating to a parent company
      for payment of parent company interest are permitted if there is no default
      under the aforementioned indentures and CCO Holdings Credit
      facilities.





The
      indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes permit Charter Holdings to
      make
      distributions to Charter Holdco for payment of interest or principal on
      Charter’s convertible senior notes, only if, after giving effect to the
      distribution, Charter Holdings can incur additional debt under the leverage
      ratio of 8.75 to 1.0, there is no default under Charter Holdings’ indentures,
      and other specified tests are met.  For the quarter ended June 30,
      2007, there was no default under Charter Holdings’ indentures, the other
      specified tests were met, and Charter Holdings met its leverage ratio test
      based
      on June 30, 2007 financial results.  Such distributions would be
      restricted, however, if Charter Holdings fails to meet these tests at the time
      of the contemplated distribution.  In the past, Charter Holdings has
      from time to time failed to meet this leverage ratio test.  There can
      be no assurance that Charter Holdings will satisfy these tests at the time
      of
      the contemplated distribution.  During periods in which distributions
      are restricted, the indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes permit
      Charter Holdings and its subsidiaries to make specified investments (that are
      not restricted payments) in Charter Holdco or Charter, up to an amount
      determined by a formula, as long as there is no default under the
      indentures.





In
      addition to the limitation on distributions under the various indentures
      discussed above, distributions by our subsidiaries may be limited by applicable
      law.  See “Risk Factors — Because of our holding company structure,
      our outstanding notes are structurally subordinated in right of payment to
      all
      liabilities of our subsidiaries.  Restrictions in our subsidiaries’
debt instruments and under applicable law limit their ability to provide funds
      to us or our various parent companies who are debt issuers.”





***Access
      to Capital***





Our
      ability to incur additional debt may be limited by the restrictive covenants
      in
      our indentures and credit facilities.  No assurances can be given that
      we will not experience liquidity problems if we do not obtain sufficient
      additional financing on a timely basis as our debt becomes due or because of
      adverse market conditions, increased competition or other unfavorable
      events.  If, at any time, additional capital or borrowing capacity is
      required beyond amounts internally generated or available under our credit
      facilities or through additional debt or equity financings, we would
      consider:





•
            issuing
                equity at a parent company level, the proceeds of which could be
                loaned or
                contributed to us;•
            issuing
                debt securities that may have structural or other priority over our
                existing notes;•
            further
                reducing our expenses and capital expenditures, which may impair
                our
                ability to increase revenue and grow operating cash
                flows;•
            selling
                assets; or•
            requesting
                waivers or amendments with respect to our credit facilities, which
                may not
                be available on acceptable terms; and cannot be
                assured.









23






If
      the
      above strategies were not successful, we could be forced to restructure our
      obligations or seek protection under the bankruptcy laws.  In
      addition, if we find it necessary to engage in a recapitalization or other
      similar transaction, our noteholders might not receive the full principal and
      interest payments to which they are contractually entitled.





***Recent
      Financing Transactions***





On
      March
      6, 2007, Charter Operating entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
      among Charter Operating, CCO Holdings, the several lenders from time to time
      that are parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent,
      and certain other agents (the “Charter Operating Credit
      Agreement”).





The
      Charter Operating Credit Agreement provides for a $1.5 billion senior secured
      revolving line of credit, a continuation of the existing $5.0 billion term
      loan
      facility (which was refinanced with new term loans in April 2007) (“Replacement
      Existing Term Loan”), and a $1.5 billion new term loan facility (the “New Term
      Loan”) which was funded in March and April 2007.  Borrowings under the
      Charter Operating Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable interest rate
      based on either LIBOR or a base rate, plus in either case, an applicable
      margin.  The applicable margin for LIBOR loans under the Replacement
      Existing Term Loan, the New Term Loan, and revolving loans is 2.00% above
      LIBOR.  The revolving line of credit commitments terminate on March 6,
      2013.  The Replacement Existing Term Loan and the New Term Loan are
      subject to amortization at 1% of their initial principal amount per annum and
      amortization commences on March 31, 2008.  The remaining principal
      amount of the Replacement Existing Term Loan and the New Term Loan will be
      due
      on March 6, 2014.  The Charter Operating Credit Agreement contains
      financial covenants requiring Charter Operating to maintain a quarterly
      consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 5 to 1 and a first lien leverage
      ratio
      not to exceed 4 to 1.





On
      March
      6, 2007, CCO Holdings entered into a credit agreement among CCO Holdings, the
      several lenders from time to time that are parties thereto, Bank of America,
      N.A., as administrative agent, and certain other agents (the “CCO Holdings
      Credit Agreement”).  The CCO Holdings Credit Agreement consists of a
      $350 million term loan facility (the “Term Facility”).  The term loan
      matures on September 6, 2014 (the “Maturity Date”).  Borrowings under
      the CCO Holdings Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable interest rate
      based on either LIBOR or a base rate plus, in either case, an applicable
      margin.  The applicable margin for LIBOR term loans is 2.50% above
      LIBOR.  The CCO Holdings Credit Agreement is secured by the equity
      interests of Charter Operating, and all proceeds thereof.





We
      used a
      portion of the additional proceeds from the Charter Operating Credit Agreement
      and CCO Holdings Credit Agreement to redeem $550 million of CCO Holdings’
outstanding floating rate notes due 2010, to redeem approximately $187 million
      of Charter Holdings’ outstanding 8.625% senior notes due 2009, to fund the
      purchase of notes in a tender offer for total consideration (including premiums
      and accrued interest) of $100 million of certain notes outstanding at Charter
      Holdings, and to repay $105 million of Charter Holdings’ notes maturing in April
      2007.  The remainder was used for other general corporate
      purposes.





***Historical
      Operating, Financing and Investing Activities***





Our
      cash
      flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006 include the cash flows related
      to
      our discontinued operations.





We
      held
      $34 million in cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2007 compared to
      $32 million as of December 31, 2006.  For the six months ended
      June 30, 2007, we generated $501 million of net cash flows from operating
      activities after paying cash interest of $506 million.  In addition,
      we used approximately $579 million for purchases of property, plant and
      equipment.  Finally, we had net cash flows provided by financing
      activities of $88 million.




***Operating
      Activities.*****Net cash provided by operating
      activities decreased $24 million, or 5%, from $525 million for the six months
      ended June 30, 2006 to $501 million for the six months ended June 30,
      2007.  For the six months ended June 30, 2007, net cash provided by
      operating activities decreased primarily as a result of changes in operating
      assets and liabilities that provided $43 million less cash during the six months
      ended June 30, 2007 than the corresponding period in 2006, and an increase
      of
      $22 million in interest on cash pay obligations during the same period, offset
      by revenues increasing at a faster rate than cash expenses.





***Investing
      Activities.*****Net cash used by investing activities
      increased to $587 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to
      $553 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, which was primarily related
      to an






24






increase
      in cash used for the purchase of property, plant, and equipment and a decrease
      in accrued expenses related to capital expenditures.




***Financing
      Activities.*****Net cash provided by financing
      activities was $88 million and $69 million for the six months ended June 30,
      2007 and 2006, respectively.  The increase in cash provided during the
      six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the corresponding period in 2006,
      was primarily the result of increased borrowings of long-term debt offset by
      an
      increase of distributions to parent companies.





***Capital
      Expenditures***





We
      have
      significant ongoing capital expenditure requirements.  Capital
      expenditures were $579 million and $539 million for the six months ended June
      30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.  Capital expenditures increased as a
      result of spending on customer premise equipment and support capital to meet
      increased digital, high-speed Internet, and telephone customer
      growth.  See the table below for more details.




Our
      capital expenditures are funded primarily from cash flows from operating
      activities, the issuance of debt and borrowings under credit
      facilities.  In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2007
      and 2006, our liabilities related to capital expenditures decreased $39 million
      and $9 million, respectively.





During
      2007, we expect capital expenditures to be approximately $1.2
      billion.  We expect that the nature of these expenditures will
      continue to be composed primarily of purchases of customer premise equipment
      related to telephone and other advanced services, support capital, and for
      scalable infrastructure costs.  We have funded and expect to continue
      to fund capital expenditures for 2007 primarily from cash flows from operating
      activities and borrowings under our credit facilities.




We
      have
      adopted capital expenditure disclosure guidance, which was developed by eleven
      publicly traded cable system operators, including us, with the support of the
      National Cable & Telecommunications Association ("NCTA").  The
      disclosure is intended to provide more consistency in the reporting of operating
      statistics in capital expenditures among peer companies in the cable
      industry.  These disclosure guidelines are not required disclosure
      under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), nor do they impact
      our
      accounting for capital expenditures under GAAP.





The
      following table presents our major capital expenditures categories in accordance
      with NCTA disclosure guidelines for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
      2006
      (dollars in millions):





**Six
                Months Ended**
              **June
                30,****2007**
            
            
            **2006**Customer
                premise equipment (a)
            
            $
            289
            
            
            $
            258Scalable
                infrastructure (b)
            
            
            100
            
            
            
            97Line
                extensions (c)
            
            
            49
            
            
            
            59Upgrade/Rebuild
                (d)
            
            
            24
            
            
            
            23Support
                capital (e)
            
            
            117
            
            
            
            102Total
                capital expenditures
            
            $
            579
            
            
            $
            539





(a)
            Customer
                premise equipment includes costs incurred at the customer residence
                to
                secure new customers, revenue units and additional bandwidth
                revenues.  It also includes customer installation costs in
                accordance with SFAS No. 51, *Financial Reporting by Cable Television
                Companies,*and customer premise equipment (e.g., set-top boxes and
                cable modems, etc.).


(b)
            Scalable
                infrastructure includes costs, not related to customer premise equipment
                or our network, to secure growth of new customers, revenue units
                and
                additional bandwidth revenues or provide service enhancements (e.g.,
                headend equipment).


(c)
            Line
                extensions include network costs associated with entering new service
                areas (e.g., fiber/coaxial cable, amplifiers, electronic equipment,
                make-ready and design engineering).


(d)
            Upgrade/rebuild
                includes costs to modify or replace existing fiber/coaxial cable
                networks,
                including betterments.







25






(e)
              Support
                  capital includes costs associated with the replacement or enhancement
                  of
                  non-network assets due to technological and physical obsolescence
                  (e.g.,
                  non-network equipment, land, buildings and
                  vehicles).




**Item
      4.                      Controls
      and Procedures.**





As
      of the
      end of the period covered by this report, management, including our Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness
      of
      the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures with respect
      to the information generated for use in this quarterly report.  The
      evaluation was based in part upon reports and certifications provided by a
      number of executives.  Based upon, and as of the date of that
      evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
      that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable
      assurances that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file
      or
      submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
      summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s
      rules and forms.





There
      were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the
      quarter ended June 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
      reporting.





In
      designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management
      recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
      operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving
      the
      desired control objectives and management necessarily was required to apply
      its
      judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
      procedures.  Based upon the above evaluation, our management believes
      that our controls provide such reasonable assurances.






26






**PART
      II. OTHER INFORMATION.**




**Item
      1.   Legal
      Proceedings.**




We
      and
      our parent companies are defendants or co-defendants in several unrelated
      lawsuits claiming infringement of various patents relating to various aspects
      of
      our businesses.  Other industry participants are also defendants in
      certain of these cases, and, in many cases, we expect that any potential
      liability would be the responsibility of our equipment vendors pursuant to
      applicable contractual indemnification provisions. In the event that a court
      ultimately determines that we infringe on any intellectual property rights,
      we
      may be subject to substantial damages and/or an injunction that could require
      us
      or our vendors to modify certain products and services we offer to our
      subscribers.  While we believe the lawsuits are without merit and
      intend to defend the actions vigorously, the lawsuits could be material to
      our
      consolidated results of operations of any one period, and no assurance can
      be
      given that any adverse outcome would not be material to our consolidated
      financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.





We
      and
      our parent companies are party to other lawsuits and claims that arise in the
      ordinary course of conducting our business.  The ultimate outcome of
      these other legal matters pending against us or our parent companies cannot
      be predicted, and although such lawsuits and claims are not expected
      individually to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
      condition, results of operations or liquidity, such lawsuits could have, in
      the
      aggregate, a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition,
      results of operations or liquidity.




**Item
      1A.   Risk Factors.**




Our
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes “Risk
      Factors” under Item 1A of Part I.  Except for the updated risk factors
      described below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors
      described in our Form 10-K.  The information below updates, and should
      be read in conjunction with, the risk factors and information disclosed in
      our
      Form 10-K.





**Risks
      Related to Significant Indebtedness of Us and Our Parent
      Companies**





***We
      and our parent companies have a significant amount of debt and may incur
      significant additional debt, including secured debt, in the future, which could
      adversely affect our and our parent companies’ financial health and our and
      their ability to react to changes in our business.***





We
      and
      our parent companies have a significant amount of debt and may (subject to
      applicable restrictions in their debt instruments) incur additional debt in
      the
      future.  As of June 30, 2007, our total debt was approximately $12.0
      billion, our member’s equity was approximately $623 million and the deficiency
      of earnings to cover fixed charges for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was
      $178 million.





As
      of
      June 30, 2007, our parent companies had approximately $7.5 billion aggregate
      principal amount of debt.  We and our parent companies will need to
      raise additional capital and/or receive distributions or payments from
      subsidiaries in order to satisfy our and their respective debt
      obligations.  Effective August 1, 2007, an additional $450 million
      aggregate principal amount of Charter’s convertible notes are held by Charter
      Holdco.





Because
      of our and their significant indebtedness, our and our parent companies’ ability
      to raise additional capital at reasonable rates or at all is uncertain, and
      our
      and our parent companies’ ability to make distributions or payments to our and
      their respective parent companies is subject to availability of funds and
      restrictions under our and our subsidiaries’ applicable debt instruments and
      under applicable law.  If we find it necessary to engage in a
      recapitalization or other similar transaction, our noteholders might not receive
      principal and interest payments to which they are contractually
      entitled.





Our
      and
      our parent companies’ significant amount of debt could have other important
      consequences.  For example, the debt will or could:





·
            require
                us to dedicate a significant portion of our cash flow from operating
                activities to make payments on our and our parent companies’ debt, which
                will reduce our funds available for working capital, capital expenditures
                and other general corporate
                expenses;


·
            limit
                our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business,
                the cable and telecommunications industries and the economy at
                large;






27




·
              place
                  us at a disadvantage as compared to our competitors that have
                  proportionately less debt;
 ·
              make
                  us vulnerable to interest rate increases, because approximately
                  33% of our
                  borrowings are, and will continue to be, subject to variable rates
                  of
                  interest;
 ·
              expose
                  us to increased interest expense as we refinance existing lower
                  interest
                  rate instruments;
 ·
              adversely
                  affect our relationship with customers and
                  suppliers;
 ·
              limit
                  our and our parent companies’ ability to borrow additional funds in the
                  future, due to applicable financial and restrictive covenants in
                  our
                  debt;
 ·
              make
                  it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations to the holders
                  of our
                  notes and to the lenders under our credit facilities as well as
                  our parent
                  companies’ ability to satisfy their obligations to their noteholders;
                  and
 ·
              limit
                  future increases in the value, or cause a decline in the value
                  of
                  Charter’s equity, which could limit Charter’s ability to raise additional
                  capital by issuing equity.






A
      default
      by us or one of our parent companies under our and their debt obligations could
      result in the acceleration of those obligations, which in turn could trigger
      cross defaults under other agreements governing our and our parent companies’
long-term indebtedness.  In addition, the secured lenders under our
      credit facilities and the holders of the Charter Operating senior second-lien
      notes could foreclose on their collateral, which includes equity interest in
      our
      subsidiaries, and exercise other rights of secured creditors.  Any
      default under those credit facilities or the indentures governing Charter’s
      convertible notes or our and our parent companies’ debt could adversely affect
      our growth, our financial condition, our results of operations, and our and
      our
      parent companies’ ability to make payments on our credit facilities and our and
      our parent companies’ other debt, and could force us to seek the protection of
      the bankruptcy laws.  We and our parent companies may incur
      significant additional debt in the future.  If current debt amounts
      increase, the related risks that we now face will intensify.





***We
      may not be able to access funds under the Charter Operating credit facilities
      if
      we fail to satisfy the covenant restrictions in such credit facilities, which
      could adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to conduct our
      business.***





We
      have
      historically relied on access to credit facilities in order to fund operations
      and to service parent company debt, and we expect such reliance to continue
      in
      the future.  Our total potential borrowing availability under our
      revolving credit facility was approximately $1.4 billion as of June 30, 2007,
      none of which is limited by covenant restrictions.  There can be no
      assurance that our actual availability under our credit facilities will not
      be
      limited by covenant restrictions in the future.





One
      of
      the conditions to the availability of funding under our credit facilities is
      the
      absence of a default under such facilities, including as a result of any failure
      to comply with the covenants under the facilities.  Among other
      covenants, the Charter Operating credit facilities require us to maintain
      specific leverage ratios.  The Charter Operating credit facilities
      also provide that Charter Operating has to obtain an unqualified audit opinion
      from its independent accountants for each fiscal year.  There can be
      no assurance that Charter Operating will be able to continue to comply with
      these or any other of the covenants under the credit facilities.





An
      event
      of default under the credit facilities or indentures, if not waived, could
      result in the acceleration of those debt obligations and, consequently, could
      trigger cross defaults under other agreements governing our and our parent
      companies’ long-term indebtedness.  In addition, the secured lenders
      under the Charter Operating credit facilities and the holders of the Charter
      Operating senior second-lien notes could foreclose on their collateral, which
      includes equity interest in our subsidiaries, and exercise other rights of
      secured creditors.  Any default under those credit facilities or the
      indentures governing our or our parent companies’ debt could adversely affect
      our growth, our financial condition, our results of operations, and our and
      our
      parent companies’ ability to make payments on our credit facilities and our and
      our parent companies’ other debt, and could force us to seek the protection of
      the bankruptcy laws, which could materially adversely impact our ability to
      operate our business and to make payments under our debt
      instruments.





***We
      depend on generating sufficient cash flow and having access to additional
      external liquidity sources to fund our and our parent companies’ debt
      obligations, capital expenditures, and ongoing
      operations.***





Our
      ability to service our and our parent companies’ debt and to fund our planned
      capital expenditures and ongoing operations will depend on both our and our
      parent companies’ ability to generate cash flow and our and our parent






28






companies’
      access to additional external liquidity sources.  Our and our parent
      companies’ ability to generate cash flow is dependent on many factors,
      including:





·
            competition
                from other distributors, including incumbent telephone companies,
                direct
                broadcast satellite operators, wireless broadband providers and DSL
                providers;


·
            difficulties
                in introducing and operating our telephone services, such as our
                ability
                to adequately meet customer expectations for the reliability of voice
                services, and our ability to adequately meet demand for installations
                and
                customer service;


·
            our
                ability to sustain and grow revenues and cash flows from operating
                activities by offering video, high-speed Internet, telephone and
                other
                services, and to maintain and grow our customer base, particularly
                in the
                face of increasingly aggressive
                competition;


·
            our
                ability to obtain programming at reasonable prices or to adequately
                raise
                prices to offset the effects of higher programming
                costs;


·
            general
                business conditions, economic uncertainty or slowdown;
                and


·
            the
                effects of governmental regulation, including but not limited to
                local and
                state franchise authorities, on our
                business.





Some
      of
      these factors are beyond our control.  If we and our parent companies are
      unable to generate sufficient cash flow or access additional external liquidity
      sources, we and our parent companies may not be able to service and repay our
      and our parent companies’ debt, operate our business, respond to competitive
      challenges, or fund our and our parent companies’ other liquidity and capital
      needs.  Although we and our parent companies have been able to raise funds
      through issuances of debt in the past, we may not be able to access additional
      sources of external liquidity on similar terms, if at all.  We expect that
      cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities, and the amounts available
      under our credit facilities will be adequate to meet our and our parent
      companies’ cash needs through 2008.  We believe that cash flows from
      operating activities and amounts available under our credit facilities may
      not
      be sufficient to fund our operations and satisfy our and our parent companies’
interest and principal repayment obligations in 2009, and will not be sufficient
      to fund such needs in 2010 and beyond.  See “Part I.  Item
      2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
      Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”





***Because
      of our holding company structure, our outstanding notes are structurally
      subordinated in right of payment to all liabilities of our
      subsidiaries.  Restrictions in our subsidiaries’ debt instruments and
      under applicable law limit their ability to provide funds to us or our various
      parent companies who are debt issuers.***





Our
      primary assets are our equity interests in our subsidiaries.  Our
      operating subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and are not
      obligated to make funds available to us for payments on our notes or other
      obligations in the form of loans, distributions or otherwise.  Our
      subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions to us is subject to their compliance
      with the terms of their credit facilities and indentures and restrictions under
      applicable law.  Under the Delaware limited liability company act, our
      subsidiaries may only make distributions to us if they have “surplus” as defined
      in the act.  Under fraudulent transfer laws, our subsidiaries may not
      make distributions to us or the applicable debt issuers to service debt
      obligations if they are insolvent or are rendered insolvent
      thereby.  The measures of insolvency for purposes of these fraudulent
      transfer laws vary depending upon the law applied in any proceeding to determine
      whether a fraudulent transfer has occurred. Generally, however, an entity would
      be considered insolvent if:





·
            the
                sum of its debts, including contingent liabilities, was greater than
                the
                fair saleable value of all its
                assets;


·
            the
                present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the amount
                that
                would be required to pay its probable liability on its existing debts,
                including contingent liabilities, as they became absolute and mature;
                or


·
            it
                could not pay its debts as they became
                due.





While
      we
      believe that our relevant subsidiaries currently have surplus and are not
      insolvent, there can be no assurance that these subsidiaries will be permitted
      to make distributions in the future in compliance with these restrictions in
      amounts needed to service our indebtedness.  Our direct or indirect
      subsidiaries include the borrowers and guarantors under the Charter Operating
      and CCO Holdings credit facilities.  Several of our subsidiaries are
      also obligors and guarantors under other senior high yield notes.  As
      of June 30, 2007, our total debt was approximately $12.0 billion, of which
      approximately $9.5 billion was structurally senior to the CCH II
      notes.






29







In
      the
      event of bankruptcy, liquidation or dissolution of one or more of our
      subsidiaries, that subsidiary’s assets would first be applied to satisfy its own
      obligations, and following such payments, such subsidiary may not have
      sufficient assets remaining to make payments to us as an equity holder or
      otherwise.  In that event:





·
            the
                lenders under Charter Operating’s credit facilities whose interests are
                secured by substantially all of our operating assets, will have the
                right
                to be paid in full before us from any of our subsidiaries’ assets;
                and


·
            the
                holders of preferred membership interests in our subsidiary, CC VIII,
                would have a claim on a portion of its assets that may reduce the
                amounts
                available for repayment to holders of our outstanding
                notes.





**Risks
      Related to Our Business**





***We
      operate in a very competitive business environment, which affects our ability
      to
      attract and retain customers and can adversely affect our business and
      operations***





The
      industry in which we operate is highly competitive and has become more so in
      recent years.  In some instances, we compete against companies with
      fewer regulatory burdens, easier access to financing, greater personnel
      resources, greater brand name recognition, and long-established relationships
      with regulatory authorities and customers.  Increasing consolidation
      in the cable industry and the repeal of certain ownership rules may provide
      additional benefits to certain of our competitors, either through access to
      financing, resources, or efficiencies of scale.





Our
      principal competitors for video services throughout our territory are direct
      broadcast satellite operators (“DBS”).  The two largest DBS providers
      are The DIRECTV Group, Inc. and Echostar Communications,
      Inc.  Competition from DBS, including intensive marketing efforts with
      aggressive pricing and exclusive programming has had an adverse impact on our
      ability to retain customers. DBS has grown rapidly over the last several years.
      The cable industry, including us, has lost a significant number of video
      customers to DBS competition, and we face serious challenges in this area in
      the
      future.  In some areas, DBS operators have entered into co-marketing
      arrangements with other of our competitors to offer service bundles combining
      video services provided by the DBS operator and digital subscriber line Internet
      services (“DSL”) along with traditional telephone service offered by the
      telephone companies.  These service bundles substantially
      resemble our bundles.  We believe that competition from DBS service
      providers may present greater challenges in areas of lower population density,
      and that our systems service a higher concentration of such areas than those
      of
      certain other major cable service providers.





Local
      telephone companies and electric utilities can offer video and other services
      in
      competition with us and they increasingly may do so in the future.  Two
      major local telephone companies, AT&T and Verizon, have both announced that
      they are making upgrades of their networks.  Some upgraded portions of
      these networks are or will be capable of carrying two-way video services that
      are comparable to ours, high-speed data services that operate at speeds as
      high
      or higher than those we make available to customers in these areas, and digital
      voice services that are similar to ours.  In addition, these companies
      continue to offer their traditional telephone services as well as bundles that
      include wireless voice services provided by affiliated
      companies.  Based on internal estimates, we believe that AT&T’s
      and Verizon’s upgrades have been completed in systems representing approximately
      6% to 7% of our homes passed as of June 30, 2007, an increase from an estimated
      2% at March 31, 2007. Additional upgrades in markets in which we operate
      are expected. In areas where they have launched video services, these
      parties are aggressively marketing video, voice and data bundles at entry level
      prices similar to those we use to market our bundles.





The
      existence of more than one cable system operating in the same territory is
      referred to as an overbuild.  Overbuilds could adversely affect our
      growth, financial condition, and results of operations, by creating or
      increasing competition.  Based on internal estimates, as of June 30,
      2007, we are aware of traditional overbuild situations impacting approximately
      8% of our estimated homes passed, and potential traditional overbuild situations
      in areas servicing approximately an additional 1% of our estimated homes
      passed.  Additional overbuild situations may occur in other
      systems.





With
      respect to our Internet access services, we face competition, including
      intensive marketing efforts and aggressive pricing, from telephone companies
      and
      other providers of DSL.  DSL service is competitive with high-speed
      Internet service over cable systems.  In addition, DBS providers have
      entered into joint marketing arrangements with Internet access providers to
      offer bundled video and Internet service, which competes with our






30






ability
      to provide bundled services to our customers.  Moreover, as we expand
      our telephone offerings, we will face considerable competition from established
      telephone companies and other carriers.





In
      order
      to attract new customers, from time to time we make promotional offers,
      including offers of temporarily reduced price or free service.  These
      promotional programs result in significant advertising, programming and
      operating expenses, and also require us to make capital expenditures to acquire
      customer premise equipment.  Customers who subscribe to our services
      as a result of these offerings may not remain customers for any significant
      period of time following the end of the promotional period.  A failure
      to retain existing customers and customers added through promotional offerings
      or to collect the amounts they owe us could have a material adverse effect
      on
      our business and financial results.





Mergers,
      joint ventures, and alliances among franchised, wireless, or private cable
      operators, DBS providers, local exchange carriers, and others, may provide
      additional benefits to some of our competitors, either through access to
      financing, resources, or efficiencies of scale, or the ability to provide
      multiple services in direct competition with us.





In
        addition to the various competitive factors discussed above, our business
        is
        subject to risks relating to increasing competition for the leisure and
        entertainment time of consumers. Our business competes with all other sources
        of
        entertainment and information delivery, including broadcast television, movies,
        live events, radio broadcasts, home video products, console games, print
        media,
        and the Internet.  Technological advancements, such as video-on-demand, new
        video formats, and Internet streaming and downloading, have increased the
        number
        of entertainment and information delivery choices available to consumers,
        and
        intensified the challenges posed by audience fragmentation. The increasing
        number of choices available to audiences could negatively impact not only
        consumer demand for our products and services, but also advertisers’ willingness
        to purchase advertising from us.  If we do not respond appropriately to
        further increases in the leisure and entertainment choices available to
        consumers, our competitive position could deteriorate, and our financial
        results
        could suffer.





We
      cannot
      assure you that our cable systems will allow us to compete
      effectively.  Additionally, as we expand our offerings to include
      other telecommunications services, and to introduce new and enhanced services,
      we will be subject to competition from other providers of the services we
      offer.  We cannot predict the extent to which competition may affect
      our business and operations in the future.





**Risks
      Related to Regulatory and Legislative Matters**





***Our
      cable system franchises are non-exclusive. Accordingly, local franchising
      authorities can grant additional franchises and create competition in market
      areas where none existed previously, resulting in overbuilds, which could
      adversely affect results of operations.***





Our
      cable
      system franchises are non-exclusive.  Consequently, local franchising
      authorities can grant additional franchises to competitors in the same
      geographic area or operate their own cable systems.  In addition, certain
      telephone companies are seeking authority to operate in communities without
      first obtaining a local franchise.  As a result, competing operators may
      build systems in areas in which we hold franchises. In some cases, municipal
      utilities may legally compete with us without obtaining a franchise from the
      local franchising authority.





Legislative
      proposals have been introduced in many state legislatures that would greatly
      streamline cable franchising.  This legislation is intended to facilitate
      entry by new competitors, particularly local telephone companies.  Such
      legislation has passed in numerous states, including states where we have
      significant operations.  Although most of these states have provided some
      regulatory relief for incumbent cable operators, some of these proposals are
      viewed as being more favorable to new entrants due to a number of factors,
      including efforts to withhold streamlined cable franchising from incumbents
      until after the expiration of their existing franchises, and the potential
      for
      new entrants to serve only higher-income areas of a particular community.
 To the extent we are not able to avail ourselves of this streamlined
      franchising process, we may continue to be subject to more onerous franchise
      requirements at the local level than new entrants. In March 2007, the FCC
      released a ruling designed to streamline competitive cable
      franchising.  Among other things, the FCC prohibited local franchising
      authorities from imposing “unreasonable” build-out requirements and established
      a mechanism whereby competing providers can secure “interim authority” to offer
      cable service if the local franchising authority has not acted on a franchise
      application within 90 days (in the case of competitors with existing right
      of
      way authority) or 180 days (in the case of competitors without existing right
      of
      way authority).  Local regulators have appealed the FCC’s
      ruling.







31






***We
      may be required to provide access to our network to other Internet service
      providers, which could significantly increase our competition and adversely
      affect our ability to provide new products and
      services.***





A
      number
      of companies, including independent Internet service providers, or ISPs, have
      requested local authorities and the FCC to require cable operators to provide
      non-discriminatory access to cable’s broadband infrastructure, so that these
      companies may deliver Internet services directly to customers over cable
      facilities.  In a 2005 ruling, commonly referred to as *Brand
      X*, the Supreme Court upheld an FCC decision making it less likely that
      any
      nondiscriminatory “open access” requirements (which are generally associated
      with common carrier regulation of “telecommunications services”) will be imposed
      on the cable industry by local, state or federal authorities.  The
      Supreme Court held that the FCC was correct in classifying cable provided
      Internet service as an “information service,” rather than a “telecommunications
      service.”  Notwithstanding *Brand X*, there has been continued
      advocacy by certain Internet content providers and consumer groups for new
      federal laws or regulations to adopt so-called “net neutrality” principles
      limiting the ability of broadband network owners (like us) to manage and control
      their own networks.  The proposals might prevent network owners, for
      example, from charging bandwidth intensive content providers, such as certain
      online gaming, music, and video service providers, an additional fee to ensure
      quality delivery of the services to consumers.  If we were required to
      allocate a portion of our bandwidth capacity to other Internet service
      providers, or were prohibited from charging heavy bandwidth intensive services
      a
      fee for use of our networks, we believe that it could impair our ability to
      use
      our bandwidth in ways that would generate maximum revenues.  In April
      2007, the FCC issued a notice of inquiry regarding the marketing practices
      of
      broadband providers as a precursor to considering the need for any FCC
      regulation of internet service providers.





***Changes
      in channel carriage regulations could impose significant additional costs on
      us.***





Cable
      operators also face significant regulation of their channel
      carriage.  We can be required to devote substantial capacity to the
      carriage of programming that we might not carry voluntarily, including certain
      local broadcast signals, local public, educational and government access
      programming, and unaffiliated commercial leased access
      programming.  This carriage burden could increase in the future,
      particularly if we are required to carry both an analog and digital versions
      of
      local broadcast signals (dual carriage) or to carry multiple program streams
      included with a single digital broadcast transmission (multicast
      carriage).  Additional government-mandated broadcast carriage
      obligations could disrupt existing programming commitments, interfere with
      our
      preferred use of limited channel capacity, and limit our ability to offer
      services that would maximize our revenue potential.  The FCC recently
      initiated a new rulemaking to explore the cable industry’s carriage obligations
      once the broadcast industry transition from analog to digital transmission
      is
      completed in February 2009.  The FCC is considering new carriage
      obligations in an effort to facilitate that transition that could increase
      the
      capacity cable operators must devote to the retransmission of broadcast
      signals.




**Item
        6.  Exhibits.**
  The
        index
        to the exhibits begins on page E-1 of this quarterly report.




32




**SIGNATURES**





Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, CCH
      II,
      LLC and CCH II Capital Corp. have duly caused this quarterly report to be signed
      on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





CCH
      II,
      LLC


Registrant


By:
      CHARTER
      COMMUNICATIONS INC., Sole Manager





Dated:
                August 13, 2007
            By:
                /s/ Kevin D. HowardName:
            Kevin
                D. HowardTitle:
            *Vice
                President and**Chief
                Accounting Officer*





CCH
      II CAPITAL
      CORP.


Registrant





Dated:
                August 13, 2007
            By:
                /s/ Kevin D. HowardName:
            Kevin
                D. HowardTitle:
            *Vice
                President and**Chief
                Accounting Officer*










S-1








**EXHIBIT
      INDEX**





Exhibit
              Number
            
            Description
                of Document3.1
            
            Certificate
                of Formation of CCH II, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
                to Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement on Form S-4 of CCH
                II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corporation filed on March 24, 2004 (File
                No.
                333-111423)).3.2
            
            Amended
                and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of CCH II, LLC,
                dated as
                of July 10, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
                Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement on Form S-4 of CCH II,
                LLC and CCH II Capital Corporation filed on March 24, 2004 (File
                No.
                333-111423)).3.3
            
            Certificate
                of Incorporation of CCH II Capital Corporation (incorporated by reference
                to Exhibit 3.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement on
                Form S-4 of CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corporation filed on March
                24, 2004 (File No. 333-111423)).3.4
            
            Amended
                and Reinstated By-laws of CCH II Capital Corporation (incorporated
                by
                reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Amendment No. 1 to the registration
                statement on Form S-4 of CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corporation
                filed on March 24, 2004 (File No. 333-111423)).12.1*
            
            Computation
                of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges31.1*
            
            Certificate
                of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a)
                under
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.31.2*
            
            Certificate
                of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a)
                under
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.32.1*
            
            Certification
                pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
                906 of
                the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive
                Officer).32.2*
            
            Certification
                pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
                906 of
                the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial
                Officer).





*
      Document attached





E-1