alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007269EN.01000303.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2007 — Maria-Luise Lindorfer v Council of the European Union

(Case C-227/04 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Officials - Transfer of pension rights - Professional activities prior to entering the service of the Communities - Calculation of the years of pensionable service - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - General implementing provisions - Principle of non-discrimination - Principle of equal treatment)

(2007/C 269/07)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Maria-Luise Lindorfer (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Anton and M. Sims-Robertson, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 18 March 2004 in Case T-204/01 Lindorfer v Council dismissing her action for annulment of the Council decision of 3 November 2000 calculating her years of pensionable service following transfer to the Community scheme of the redemption value of the pension rights which she had acquired under the Austrian scheme.

Lindorfer

Council

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 18 March 2004 in Case T-204/01 Lindorfer v Council to the extent that it dismissed Ms Lindorfer's action on the ground that there was no discrimination based on sex; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 18 March 2004 in Case T-204/01 Lindorfer v Council to the extent that it dismissed Ms Lindorfer's action on the ground that there was no discrimination based on sex;

Lindorfer

Council

| 2. | Annuls the Decision of the Council of the European Union of 3 November 2000 calculating the number of Ms Lindorfer's years of pensionable service; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the Decision of the Council of the European Union of 3 November 2000 calculating the number of Ms Lindorfer's years of pensionable service;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;

| 4. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs at first instance and on appeal.

---

(1)  JO C 190, 24.7.2004.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

JOHN A. REED,

Petitioner,

vs. Civil Action 2:11-CV-263

Judge Frost

Magistrate Judge King

WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION,

Respondent.

ORDER

On March 28, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended

that petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be

denied. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 2. Although petitioner was

advised of his right to object to the recommendation and of the

consequences of his failure to do so, petitioner has nevertheless not

objected.

The Report and Recommendation is therefore ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. No. 1,

is DENIED.

Petitioner may have thirty (30) days to pay the full filing fee. 

His failure to do so will result in the dismissal of the action for

failure to prosecute.

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

 Gregory L. Frost

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00263-GLF-NMK Doc #: 4 Filed: 05/12/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 53664.

protests 116200-K, etc. (Cleveland, etc.).

#### Siegfried Loewenthal Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2007211EN.01003501.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/35

---

Action brought on 26 June 2007 — Agroquivir v Council and Commission

(Case T-218/07)

(2007/C 211/68)

Language of the proceedings: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Agroquivir, S. Coop. And. de Segundo Grado (Seville, Spain) (represented by: Luis Ortiz Blanco, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities

Defendants:

Forms of order sought

| — | to uphold the present action for damages, in accordance with Article 288 EC, and declare that the applicant is entitled to be financially compensated by the Council and the Commission jointly and severally in the sum total of two hundred and eighty-eight thousand two hundred and thirty-eight euros (EUR 288 238); |
| --- | --- |

—

to uphold the present action for damages, in accordance with Article 288 EC, and declare that the applicant is entitled to be financially compensated by the Council and the Commission jointly and severally in the sum total of two hundred and eighty-eight thousand two hundred and thirty-eight euros (EUR 288 238);

| — | to order the defendant institutions to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

to order the defendant institutions to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those already put forward in Case T-217/07 Las Palmeras v Council and Commission.

Las Palmeras

Council and Commission

---
```

[113th Congress Public Law 57]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 127 STAT. 656]]

Public Law 113-57
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
         To extend the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 for 10 
              years. <<NOTE: Dec. 9, 2013 -  [H.R. 3626]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF UNDETECTABLE FIREARMS ACT OF 1988 FOR 10 
                              YEARS.

    Section 2(f)(2) of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 (18 U.S.C. 
922 note) is amended by striking ``25'' and inserting ``35''.

    Approved December 9, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3626:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013):
            Dec. 3, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Teunis H. Haulenbeck, *Appellant, v.*Alfred T. Van Nostrand and others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
Docket Number FAA-2013-0631
#### The People v. Arthur J. McQuade *et al.*

Motion to vacate judgment on forfeited recognizance.

Motion granted.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Final supplemental environmental impact statement on management of habitat for late-successional and old-growth forest related species within the range of the northern spotted owl

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Final supplemental environmental impact statement on management of habitat for late-successional and old-growth forest related species within the range of the northern spotted owl 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Forest ServiceUnited States. Bureau of Land Management 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  Interagency SEIS Team 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  Northwest, Pacific 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  WashingtonOregonCalifornia 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  193 × 62 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  PostersMaps 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  030689364.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 65623.

#### Firmenich, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 240704-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in *United States*v. *Dodge & Olcott, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1



Registrant (Commission File Number 333-110029):



Broder Bros., Co.

401 E. Hunting Park Ave

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19124



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Broder Bros., Co. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 26, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent Tyra, Chief Executive Officer of Broder Bros., Co., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broder Bros., Co.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



August 10, 2004



BRODER BROS., CO.By:

/s/    VINCENT TYRAVincent TyraPresident and Chief Executive Officer
FOREST RESEARCH NOTES 

NORTHEASTERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION 

Upper Darby , Pennsylvania 

No. 24 

September 1953 

Hardwood Log Grading 

Scale Stick Improved 

In February 1952 the Northeastern Forest Experiment 

Station described (~esearch Note 13) a new log-grading scale 

stick developed by the Station for use as a visual aid in 

0 grading hardwood factory logs. It was based on the U. S. 

Forest Products Laboratory's log-grade specifications. 

About the same time, working independently, personnel 

of the Southeastern Forest Experiment Station developed a 

similar scale stick for the same use. 

By combining the best features of the two sticks, 

personnel of the two experiment stations have worked together to produce a single improved stick. Other useful information has been added. The improved stick has been 

approved for use by both experiment stations end by the 

Forest Products Laboratory. 

In its final form the stick has a graphic outline of 

the log-grading system on one side. On the other side, any 

conventional log rule can be used. Merritt hypsometer readings have been printed on one edge, and Biltmore stick 

readings on the other edge. The Biltmore stick readings i have been adjusted to make allowance for the width of the 

stick. 

A table of absolute sweep allowances (by the more 

common diameter and log-length classes) has been added at 

one end of the grading side of the stick. The addition of 

this information increases the value of the stick as a 

cruising aid. 

For use in timber cruising, the stick could be modi- 

fied further by substituting a composite tree-volume table 

on the reverse side instead of the log rule. 

Detailed full-scale plans of this log-grading aid can 

be obtained from the Northeastern Forest hperiment Station, 

102 llotors /\-venue, Upper Darby, Pa. ; or the Southeastern 

1 
Forest lkperiment Station, 223 Federal Building, P. 0. Box 

2570, Asheville, hT. C. 

M. D. OSTRANDER 

Northeastern Forest Experiment Station 

and 

G. He ENGLERTH 

Southeastern Forest Experiment Station 

Agriculture-Forest Service-Upper Darby, Pa,
Case: 2:11-cv-00775-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 10/12/11 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T13:51:04-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Case: 2:11-cv-00583-JLG-EPD Doc #: 48 Filed: 11/15/11 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T14:50:27-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# C_2007183EN.01003002.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/30

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 May 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-490/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 183/57)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
A89A2100.

#### MIZE v. CLEVELAND EXPRESS et al.

(392 SE2d 275)

Decided March 5, 1990

Rehearing denied March 22, 1990

*Robert P. Wilson,*for appellant.

*John P. Hines, Michael D. Usry,*for appellees.

Cooper, Judge.

Appellant, who was receiving workers’ compensation benefits for a temporary total disability, was adjudicated guilty of a felony and received a twenty-three year prison sentence. After appellant’s incarceration, the appellee insurance company’s request to suspend payment of benefits was denied by the administrative law judge on the basis that no offer of suitable employment was made by the employer to the employee. The denial was affirmed by the Workers’ Compensation Board and then reversed by the superior court.

We agree with the superior court that the case of *Scott Housing Systems v. Howard,*256 Ga. 675 (353 SE2d 2) (1987), is controlling. The Supreme Court therein espoused the general principle that “[i]n workers’ compensation cases where the employee is charged with a crime while receiving benefits, . . . the proper time for termination of benefits is the date of adjudication of guilt.” Id. That decision was not limited, as argued by appellant, to the narrower issue in *Howard v. Scott Housing Systems,*180 Ga. App. 690 (350 SE2d 27) (1986), and has since been more broadly applied. See *Sargent v. Brown,*186 Ga. App. 890 (368 SE2d 826) (1988). Since the appellant in the instant case was receiving his benefits at the time he was charged with a crime, his benefits should terminate upon the date that guilt was positively adjudicated. Any offer of employment that may have been tendered to appellant would have been ineffectual since appellant could not meaningfully accept.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Deen, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.*
# C_2007170EN.01000702.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 June 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Novara — Italy) — Carp Snc di L. Moleri e V. Corsi, Associazione Nazionale Artigiani Legno e Arredamenti v Ecorad Srl

(Case C-80/06) (1)

1

(Directive 89/106/EC - Construction products - Procedure for attestation of conformity - Commission Decision 1999/93/EC - Horizontal direct effect - No such effect)

(2007/C 170/12)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Novara

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Carp Snc di L. Moleri e V. Corsi, Associazione Nazionale Artigiani Legno e Arredamenti

Applicant:

Defendant: Ecorad Srl

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale ordinario di Novara — Interpretation of Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 1999/93/EC of 25 January 1999 on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards doors, windows, shutters, blinds, gates and related building hardware (OJ 1999 L 29, p. 51), and of Annexes II and III thereto — Manufacture of doors fitted with panic bars by fitters who have not complied with the attestation procedure laid down by the decision — Exclusion?

Operative part of the judgment

An individual cannot rely, in the context of legal proceedings against another individual concerning contractual liability, on the infringement by the latter of Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 1999/93/EC of 25 January 1999 on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards doors, windows, shutters, blinds, gates and related building hardware, and of Annexes II and III thereto.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Min Sok Randy Park, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and allreports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto ReceivablesTrust 2010-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

 

Date: March 28, 2012
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, William Strauss, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Provide Commerce, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 2, 2005