alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007295EN.01002101.xml

| 7.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/21

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 December 2007

(2007/C 295/08)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4554 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 161,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4587 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71850 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3905 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6503 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,28 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0460 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5853 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,121 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,09 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6989 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,5823 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5207 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,188 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7150 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6726 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4817 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3460 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8866 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1062 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 342,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8560 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7838 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3260 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 484,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8741 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,981 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,7590 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,239 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4554

JPY

Japanese yen

161,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4587

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71850

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3905

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6503

ISK

Iceland króna

90,28

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0460

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5853

CZK

Czech koruna

26,121

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,09

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6989

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,5823

RON

Romanian leu

3,5207

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,188

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7150

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6726

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4817

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3460

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8866

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1062

KRW

South Korean won

1 342,32

ZAR

South African rand

9,8560

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7838

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3260

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 484,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8741

PHP

Philippine peso

60,981

RUB

Russian rouble

35,7590

THB

Thai baht

44,239

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7028

FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL 

SERVICES, (“DPSCS”); GARY MAYNARD, Secretary, DPSCS; GREGG L. 

HERSHBERGER, Secretary, DPSCS; COMMISSIONER STOUFFER; DAYENA 

CORCORAN, Warden; LAURA ARMSTEAD, Assistant Warden; CEO 

OF MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ENTERPRISES, Shiloh; CORRECTIONAL 

OFFICER BIVENS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NIVENS; CORRECTIONAL 

OFFICER WASHINGTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HENRY; 

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OSLES; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER 

GATEWOOD; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KRAMO; CORRECTIONAL 

OFFICER DAUGHTERY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BAILEY; 

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FLIGGINS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER 

MACKALL; SOCIAL WORKER REMBRAUNDAT; SOCIAL WORKER 

CARYA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. 

Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00090-JFM)

Submitted: November 21, 2017 Decided: November 28, 2017

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant 

Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Frankie McCoy, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil 

action asserting claims under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. 

§§ 701 to 7961 (West 2008 & Supp. 2017); the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 

§§ 12101 to 12213 (2012); and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. McCoy v. Md. Dep’t of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No. 1:16-cv-00090-JFM (D. 

Md. July 28, 2017). We grant McCoy’s motion to amend/correct his informal brief. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2007212EN.01000202.xml

| 11.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4685 — Enel/Acciona/Endesa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 212/04)

On 5 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4685. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4685. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
Exhibit 32.2

SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31,2007, as filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Stockslager, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Mark J. StockslagerMark J. Stockslager Chief Financial
Officer


February 13, 2008
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Communications platform payloaddefinition study**
 
Executive Summary | Technical Report
 
SuDoc:NAS 1.26:174985-174986
Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000833292
 
November 20, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2224

ALAN MILES, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

FULTON BANK, 

 Defendant – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District 

Judge. (2:08-cv-00202-RBS-TEM) 

Submitted: July 20, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009 

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

William C. Bischoff, Kevin E. Martingayle, Jonathan L. Stone, 

STALLINGS & BISCHOFF, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for 

Appellant. Jonathan L. Hauser, TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, 

Virginia Beach, Virginia, Robert A. Angle, TROUTMAN & SANDERS, 

LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Alan Miles appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion for partial summary judgment and granting Defendant’s 

summary judgment motion on his breach of contract action. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Miles v. Fulton Bank, No. 2:08-cv-00202-RBS-TEM 

(E.D. Va. filed Sept. 30, 2008; entered Oct. 2, 2008). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 12.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Bin Yu, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of
Tudou Holdings Limited (the Company), as amended by this Amendment No. 1 to Form 20-F;

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
June 27, 2012

|                                
|--------------------------------
|                                
|By: /s/ Bin Yu                  
|Name: Bin Yu                    
|Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08502

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 08502\08502_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08502\08502_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08502\08502_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08502\08502_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08502\08502_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08502\08502_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08502\08502_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08502\08502_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

08502\Certification Statement Plant ID 08502.pdf Plant certification statement

x 08502\Supplemental Documents\08502_MAP-1 G-1160.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08502\Supplemental Documents\08502_SE-1 and SE-2 dry fly ash F-1018.2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08502\Supplemental Documents\08502_SE-1 Ash system F-1018.1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08502\Supplemental Documents\08502_SE-2 Ash system F-2018.1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08502\Supplemental Documents\WB-1 F-2025.3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# International Cometary Explorer

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  International Cometary Explorer 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shows the veteran spacecraft ISEE-3, renamed International Cometary Explorer (ICE), and the comet Giacobini-Zinner. The ICE was the first probe to pass through the tail of a comet. Describes the spacecraft, the 1st and 2nd missions, thechase, and comet encounter. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  184 × 120 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  015032790.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
No. 59131.

protest 228232-K, etc. (New York).

#### Sintered Carbide Corp. and Airport Clearance Service *v.*United States,

*403Opinion by

La whence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bars containing more than 50 percent of tungsten carbide, which are not steel or iron materials or articles, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 58268, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO THE

    CHINA
      BAK BATTERY INC. 

    STOCK
      OPTION PLAN

     

    WHEREAS,
      China BAK Battery, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the China BAK Battery, Inc.
      Stock Option Plan; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has been
      appointed as the “Committee” under the Plan; and 

     

    WHEREAS,
      Article 5.1 of the Plan provides that the Committee may amend the Plan, subject
      to shareholder approval of such amendment if such approval is required under
      applicable law; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Committee now desires to amend the Plan to, among other things, increase
      the
      number of shares of Common Stock issuable under the Plan from 4,000,000 shares
      to 8,000,000 shares; 

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

     

    FIRST:
      Section
      1.6 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety:

     

    1.6 Maximum
      Number of Plan Shares.
      Subject
      to adjustment pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.2, and subject to any
      additional restrictions elsewhere in the Plan, the maximum aggregate number
      of
      shares of Common Stock that may be issued and sold hereunder shall be 8,000,000.
      Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Company
      Common Stock which may be issued under the Plan shall during any given calendar
      year not exceed 5% of the total outstanding shares of Company Common Stock
      during such calendar year.

     

    SECOND:
      The
      second sentence of Section 1.7 of the Plan is deleted such that Section 1.7
      is
      amended to read in its entirety:

    


    1.7 Options
      and Stock Granted Under Plan.
      If an
      Option terminates without being wholly exercised, new Options may be granted
      hereunder covering the number of Plan Shares to which such Option termination
      relates. 

     

    THIRD:
      Except
      as provided above, the Plan shall continue in full force and
      effect.

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    FOURTH:
      Any
      capitalized term used herein, but not defined herein, shall have the meaning
      ascribed to such term in the Plan.

     

    FIFTH:
      This
      Amendment No. 1 to the Plan is subject to the approval of the stockholders
      of
      the Company and shall become effective upon such approval. 

    


    
      
         

      

      
        2
Designated for electronic publication onl y

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIM S

N O

. 19

- 6707

P ATRICIA K. S NIDER

, A PPELLANT

,

V

.

D ENIS M C D ONOUGH

, S ECRETARY OF V ETERANS A FFAIRS

, A PPELLEE

.

Before P IETSCH

, TOTH , and FALVEY, Judges

.

O R D E R

Note: Pursuant to U.S. Vet. App. R. 30(a), this action may not be cited as precedent.

In a July 16, 2021, memorandum decision, the Court affirmed the part of a June 4, 2019,

Board of Vetera n s' Appeals decision denying a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) for Army veteran Norman J. Snider. Patricia K. Snider is the veteran's surviving spouse. On August 6, 2021, Ms. Snider, through counsel, filed a timely motion for single

- judge reconsider ation or

, in the alternative

, panel review.

Based on review of the pleadings and the record of proceedings, the Court concludes that the appeal raises an issue warranting a precedential decision. See U.S. V ET . A PP . R. 35(e); Frankel

v. Derwinski , 1 Vet.App. 23, 25

- 26 (1990).

Upon consideration of the above , it is

ORDERED that the motion for panel review is granted. It is further

ORDERED that the July 16, 2021, single

- judge decision is withdrawn.

DATED: October 5, 2021 PER CURIAM.

Copies to:

Sandr a E. Booth, Esq.

VA General Counsel (027)
# C_2007235EN.01001001.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 30 July 2007 — Turgay Semen v Deutsche Tamoil GmbH

(Case C-348/07)

(2007/C 235/16)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Turgay Semen

Applicant:

Defendant: Deutsche Tamoil GmbH

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it compatible with Article 17(2)(a) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC (1) of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents to limit the indemnity to which a commercial agent is entitled by the amount of commission lost as a result of the termination of the agency contract, even though the benefits which the principal continues to derive have to be given a higher monetary value? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it compatible with Article 17(2)(a) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC (1) of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents to limit the indemnity to which a commercial agent is entitled by the amount of commission lost as a result of the termination of the agency contract, even though the benefits which the principal continues to derive have to be given a higher monetary value?

1

| 2. | Are benefits accruing to other companies within the group to which the principal belongs also to be taken into consideration for the purposes of the above calculation? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are benefits accruing to other companies within the group to which the principal belongs also to be taken into consideration for the purposes of the above calculation?

---

(1)  OJ L 382, p. 17.

1

---