alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6285]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia and the District of 
Columbia)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 2:30 p.m. 
ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inez E. De Jesus at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 2:30 p.m. ET via a telephone conference 
call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, 
please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write Inez E. De Jesus, 
TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340, Plantation, FL 
33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to 
participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with 
Inez E. De Jesus. Ms. De Jesus can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7977, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 29, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E7-6285 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 6, 2019

s0904m

Order 

Clerk

September 6, 2019

159739(48)

SC: 159739

In re PEREZ/DUPREE, Minors. COA: 345451

Kent CC Family Division:

17-050620-NA; 17-050621-NA

17-050622-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s August 2, 

2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
No. 40263.

#### Protest 291199-G of Robison Rayon Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Single yarns in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in *Weinman*v. *United States*(T. D. 49408) were held dutiable at 40 cents per pound under paragraph 31 as claimed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

          - 12 CFR Parts 652 and 655 
          - RIN 3052-AC17 

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final rule under parts 652 and 655 on December 26, 2006 (71 FR 77247). This final rule is intended to more accurately reflect risk in the risk-based capital stress test (RBCST) in order to improve the RBCST's output—Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation's regulatory minimum risk-based capital level. In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of the final rule is 30 days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                         during which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the records of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of the regulations is March 31, 2007.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         The regulation amending 12 CFR parts 652 and 655, published on December 26, 2006 (71 FR 77247) is effective March 31, 2007.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph T. Connor, Associate Director for Policy and Analysis, Office of Secondary Market Oversight, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4280, TTY (703) 883-4434; or Rebecca S. Orlich, Senior Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TTY (703) 883-4020. 

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

Dated: March 28, 2007. 

Roland E. Smith, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. E7-6076 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
exv10w6






Exhibit 10.6




AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED WAFER SUPPLY AGREEMENT




     This Amendment Number Three (the “Amendment ”), effective as of June 9, 2008 (the
“Amendment Effective Date”), amends the Amended and Restated Wafer Supply Agreement effective as of
April 1, 2003 (as further amended by Amendment Number One, effective August 11, 2004 and Amendment
Number Two, effective April 1, 2008) (the “Agreement”), by and between OKI Electric Industry
Co., Ltd. (“OKI ELECTRIC” or “OKI”), a Japanese corporation having its registered head office
at 7-12, Toranomon 1-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8460, Japan, and Power Integrations
International, Ltd. (“PI”) a Cayman Islands corporation having its principal place of business
at 4th Floor, Century Yard, Cricket Square, Elgin Avenue, P.O. Box 32322, Grand Cayman KY1-1209.
Unless specifically designated otherwise, capitalized terms used herein shall have the same
meanings given them in the Agreement.



Recitals




     Whereas, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, PI grants to OKI ELECTRIC licenses
of certain of PI’s intellectual property for the sole purpose of PI acquiring from OKI ELECTRIC the
fabrication and supply of wafers of certain power IC products; and



     Whereas, PI and OKI ELECTRIC desire to amend the terms of the Agreement; and



     Whereas, in accordance with Section 18.10 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be
amended only by an instrument in writing duly executed by authorized officers of OKI ELECTRIC and
PI.



     Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:



Agreement





	1.	 	Section 13.1 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
	 
	 	 	This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect from the Effective Date until
April 1, 2013, unless earlier terminated as provided herein (“Term”).




Effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, all references in the Agreement to the “Agreement” or
“this Agreement” shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Except as expressly amended
herein, the terms of the Agreement continue unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect.
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be considered an
original, but all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




Confidential




1









 




In Witness Whereof, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly
authorized representatives, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY CO., LTD.	 	 	 	POWER INTEGRATIONS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Akira Arimatsu
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ John L. Tomlin	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Akira Arimatsu
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	John L. Tomlin	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	General Manager
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	President	 	 






Confidential





2
Exhibit 35.1

Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon,
as Trustee.

I, James W. P. Hall, Vice President of The Bank of New
York Mellon, a New York corporation (the “Trustee”), states:

(a) A review of the Trustee’s activities for the period
from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Trustee’s performance under
the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated July 15, 2010 between MS Structured Asset Corp. as depositor (the “Depositor”)
and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary, in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor and
the Trustee (as amended in each such case, the “Trust Agreement”), has been made under my supervision.

(b) To the best of my knowledge and based on such review,
the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period
for CMT Linked Trust Units Series 2010-01.

The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee



|Date: March 01, 2019 |  | By: /s/ James W. Hall
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                     |  | Name:  James W. Hall 
|                     |  | Title: Vice President
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1435** 

TAWANDA BLAIR, on behalf of JDS , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson
. Richard M
. Gergel , District Judge. ( 8:11

- cv - 01476

- RMG )

Submitted : June 18, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tawanda Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PE R CURIAM: Tawanda Blair seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order upholding the Commissioner’s decision denying Blair’s application for supplemental security income filed on behalf of her minor child . The district court referred this case to a magistrat e judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. A. § 636(b)(1)(B) ( West 200 6 & Supp. 2011 ). The magistrate judge recommended that the Commissioner’s decision be upheld and advised Blair that failure to file timely objections to the recommendation could waive appellate revie w of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned o f the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Blair has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper warning . Accordingly, we di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. The motion to transfer to Atlanta, Georgia, is denied.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8761 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8761

 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide that non-Federal 
 revenue generated through certain distance education programs may be 
counted purposes of the non-Federal revenue requirements applicable to 
  proprietary institutions of higher education (commonly known as the 
                            ``90/10 rule'').

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2024

    Mr. Owens (for himself and Mr. Bean of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide that non-Federal 
 revenue generated through certain distance education programs may be 
counted purposes of the non-Federal revenue requirements applicable to 
  proprietary institutions of higher education (commonly known as the 
                            ``90/10 rule'').

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Distance Education Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF REVENUE FROM CERTAIN DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS 
              FOR PURPOSES OF THE 90/10 RULE.

    Section 487(d)(1)(B)(iii) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 1094(d)(1)(B)(iii)) is amended by inserting ``(which may include 
funds paid for a program offered in whole or in part through distance 
education regardless of the location from which such program is carried 
out)'' after ``under this title''.
                                 <all>
```
February 1, 1943

No. 47985.

#### Protest 58025-K of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 50572.

#### Protests 116258-K, etc., of Anglo Oriental Importing & Rug Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 56031.

protests 172006-K, etc. (New York).

#### Victor M. Calderon Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested not found were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 38968.

#### Protest 447451-G of Richard Shipping Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was established that certain items consist of articles; in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 372301. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained-
#### Stephen Tandler *v.*United States

No. 7511.

Entry No. 711985.

Pro forma invoice dated London, England, April 16, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 9, 1946.

(Decided January 20, 1948)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)'

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert J. McMullan, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                          
|----- |  | -------------------------
|Date: |  | 12/21/2016               
|      | 
|      |  | /s/ Robert J. McMullan   
|      |  | Robert J. McMullan       
|      |  | Senior Vice President and
|      |  | Chief Financial Officer
PARTICULATE MATTER DATA – PM2.5

EPA has designated the following National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM2.5: 

Level Averaging Time Description 

12.0 μg/m3

Annual (Arithmetic 

Average) 

To attain this standard, the 3-year average of the annual mean PM2.5 concentrations 

from monitors must not exceed 12.0 μg/m3

 (effective December 14, 2012). 

35 μg/m3 24-hour To attain this standard, the 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour 

concentrations must not exceed 35 μg/m3 (effective December 17, 2006). 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

PM2.5 Concentration (μg/m3)

PM2.5 : 3-yr Average of the 98th Percentile of 24-hour Concentrations

24-hour NAAQS

Amazon Park

Cottage Grove

City Shops

Saginaw

Hwy 99 - Four

corners

Springfield City

Hall

Oakridge

24-HOUR AVERAGE PM2.5 LEVELS 2006 - 2015 (μg/m3) 

Site Name 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 

Amazon Park

Annual mean 8.3 7.4 7.8 8.5 5.8 6.5 6.4 7.8 7.2 7.3 

Highest 24-hour 43.3 43.0 40.0 59.9 21.0 24.6 31.6 51.9 35.5 55.3 

Annual 98th %-ile 31.8 36.3 28.7 35.9 16.0 21.2 25.4 38.6 30.7 26.7 

3 year 98th %-ile 32 35 32 34 27 24 21 28 32 32 

Cottage 

Grove City 

Shops 

Annual mean --- --- 8.1 8.5 6.9 7.1 6.7 7.5 7.0 7.3 

Highest 24-hour --- --- 31.8 33.6 21.1 32.1 24.7 38.1 34.0 39.6 

Annual 98th %-ile --- --- 21.1 30.2 18.3 20.4 17.0 25.4 21.3 20.1 

3 year 98th %-ile --- --- --- --- 23 23 19 21 21 22 

Saginaw 

Annual mean 5.5 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

Highest 24-hour 16.6 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

Annual 98th %-ile 16.6 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

3 year 98th %-ile 16 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

Hwy 99 - Four 

Corners 

Annual mean --- 8.4 8.3 8.2 6.3 10.0 6.5 8.3 7.1 8.0 

Highest 24-hour --- 53.5 32.4 47.9 22.9 26.7 30.0 54.6 43.6 56.4 

Annual 98th %-ile --- 33.9 25.3 36.4 19.5 22.1 20.6 40.2 30.5 25.6 

3 year 98th %-ile --- --- --- 32 27 26 21 28 30 32 

Springfield 

City Hall 

Annual mean 7.4 6.8 6.9 6.8 5.8 5.6 5.5 6.3 6.4 6.3 

Highest 24-hour 30.2 38.6 32.3 21.9 17.9 18.8 18.3 18.8 35.6 54.0 

Annual 98th %-ile 27.8 18.4 23.5 18.3 14.0 14.8 15.3 17.2 14.2 13.3 

3 year 98th %-ile 24 24 23 20 19 16 15 16 16 15 

Oakridge 

Annual mean 11.1 10.5 11.5 11.0 8.9 10.0 7.6 9.8 10.1 8.9 

Highest 24-hour 47.0 52.5 43.5 44.1 43.1 47.9 49.9 54.9 46.1 39.3 

Annual 98th %-ile 38.6 42.7 38.7 41.3 33.0 42.0 38.4 41.0 41.1 28.9 

3 year 98th %-ile 48 47 40 41 38 39 38 40 40 37
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Whistleblowing

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Whistleblowing 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Merit Systems Protection Board. Office of the Special Counsel 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Rev. 12/90. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  139 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  024416050.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -