alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,359,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,450,000
<PP&E>                                         456,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 304,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,726,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          747,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    128,000
<COMMON>                                       449,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     226,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,726,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,024,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,806,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                204,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            191,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   191,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



Sergei Rogov  the Chief
Executive Officer,  and Director of Solarflex Corp  , certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for
the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|Date: January 14, 2013 | Solarflex Corp                                  
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------
|                       |                                                 
|                       | By:                                             
|                       | Name:                                           
|                       | Title:    Chief Executive Officer, and  Director



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# I'm gonna be just like my dad!

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  I'm gonna be just like my dad! 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. American Forces Information Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  American Forces Information Service, Department of Defense 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Shipping list no.: 94-0345-P. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Defense billboard ; 82; Defense billboard (1988) ; # 82. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  156 × 44 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### UNITED STATES, Appellant v RANDALL D. MARTIN, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellee

No. 30,087

July 11, 1975

*Lieutenant Colonel Ronald M. Holdaway, Major Steven M. Werner,*and *Captain Nancy M. Giorno*were on the pleadings for Appellant, United States.

*Lieutenant Colonel James Kucera, Captain Allan L. Placke,*and *Captain John R. Osgood*were on the pleadings for Appellee, Accused.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

The Army Judge Advocate General certified this case for review under the provisions of Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867(b)(2). The certificate of review requested that action be taken with regard to the following issues:

> I. WAS THE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW CORRECT IN ITS DETERMINATION THAT WRONGFUL POSSESSION OF AMPHETAMINES FALLS WITHIN THE AMBIT OF ARTICLE 134, CLAUSE 1 OR 2?

> II. IF THE FIRST CERTIFIED ISSUE IS ANSWERED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE, DID THE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW ERR IN ITS DETERMINATION THAT THE ELEMENTS OF PREJUDICIAL OR SERVICE DISCREDITING CONDUCT WERE itfOT PROVEN AT TRIAL?

The Court of Military Review found in setting aside the findings and dismissing the charge that as a matter of fact there was "no proof to support the service-discrediting provision of clause two” of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 USC §934, *United States v Martin,*50 CMR 314, 317 (ACMR 1975). This was a finding of fact which, under the circumstances in this case, is binding on the Court. *United States v Phifer,*18 USCMA 508, 40 CMR 220 (1969); *United States v Smith,*17 USCMA 427, 38 CMR 225 (1968); *United States v Judd,*10 USCMA 113, 27 CMR 187 (1959).

Regardless of the answer to the first certified question, the Court of Military Review’s decision setting aside the findings and sentence and dismissing the charge would be unaffected; therefore, the first certified question is rendered moot.

The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed.
AFS-13-229-E February 20, 2013

Mr. Mario R. Sotolongo

4373 Ford Road Ann Arbor, MI 48105

Dear Mr. Sotolongo:

This letter is in response to your correspondence sent to the public docket dated February 8, 2013 (public docket No. FAA-2011-0563) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration for an exemption from § 91.109(a) and (b)(3) of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). That exemption allowed you to conduct flight instruction in Beechcraft Bonanza, Debonair, Baron, and TravelAir airplanes equipped with a functioning throwover

wheel.

On August 31, 2011, the FAA amended 14 CFR part 91 related to throwover control wheels (76 FR 54095). A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Alyson M. Mount, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





Dated: March 29, 2016





By: /s/ Alyson M. Mount





Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
# C_2007247EN.01003501.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/35

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 28 August 2007 — Galileo Lebensmittel v Commission

(Case T-46/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Implementation of the Top Level Domain ‘eu’ - Registration of the domain name ‘galileo.eu’ - Use restricted to the institutions and bodies of the Community - Locus standi - Inadmissibility)

(2007/C 247/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Galileo Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG (Trierweiler, Germany) (represented by: K. Bott, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by: E. Montaguti and T. Jürgensen, then by: G. Braun and E. Montaguti, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of the Commission's decision to register ‘galileo.eu’ as an eu. Top Level Domain reserved for use by the Community institutions and bodies, pursuant to Article 9 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 of 28 April 2004 laying down public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the ‘.eu’ Top Level Domain and the principles governing registration (OJ 2004 L 162, p. 40)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Galileo Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Galileo Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006.

1

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# You'll earn more than money with this temporary job-- work with the U.S. Census Bureau on a national community event--the 1990 census

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  You'll earn more than money with this temporary job-- work with the U.S. Census Bureau on a national community event--the 1990 census 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Bureau of the Census 
                    -           Description        
                    -  D-3212. 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Bureau of the Census 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  021277448.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00401

- CR NO. 02

- 14

- 00402

- CR

ROBERT WAYNE WESTBRO OK APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------
FROM THE 297TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO S . 1375130D, 1377192D

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Robert Wayne Westbrook attempts to appeal his convictions for
burglary of a building. The trial court’s certification in each cause state s that this
“is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant h as NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R.
App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On Septe mber 26, 2014, we notified Westbrook that the
appeal s would be dismissed pursuant to the trial court’s certification s unless he

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

or any party desiring to continue the appeal s filed a response showing grounds
for continuing the appeal s

. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. Westbrook filed a
response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal s . Therefore, in

accordance with the trial court’s certification s, we dismiss these appeal s

. See
Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 30 , 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

LARRY VINCENT FERRELL,

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:10-cv-1138

v. Judge Algenon L. Marbley

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

SHERIFF GEORGE 

LAVENDER, JR., et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the October 26, 2012 Report and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to whom this case was referred pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (ECF No. 20.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; dismiss Plaintiff’s medical indifference claims

without prejudice; dismiss his claims under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability

Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) for lack of standing; and decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction

over his remaining state-law malpractice claim. 

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advises parties that

the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report

results in a “waiver of the right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the

right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 8, ECF No.

20.) The time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. 

Case: 2:10-cv-01138-ALM-EPD Doc #: 22 Filed: 11/28/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Noting

that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections expired, the Court

ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20), GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for

Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17), DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s medical

indifference claims, DISMISSES Plaintiff’s HIPAA claims for lack of standing; and DECLINES

to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s remaining state-law medical malpractice

claim, DISMISSING this claim WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter

judgment accordingly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DATED: November 28, 2012

 

2

Case: 2:10-cv-01138-ALM-EPD Doc #: 22 Filed: 11/28/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Paul E. Martin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrants and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ Paul E. MartinPaul E. MartinInterim Co-Chief Financial Officer(Co-Principal Financial Officer)
#### Morris Bernstein, Resp’t, *v.*Wolf Cohen, App’lt.

Appeal from third judicial district, Dean, J.

*Ordered,*that the judgment be affirmed, with costs.