alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JOHN E. SAVOY, Jr., Airman Third Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant

13 USCMA 419, 32 CMR 419

*420No. 16,354

December 21, 1962

*Colonel Joseph E. Krysakoioslti*and *Major Charles K. Rush*for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Emanuel Lewis*was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Kilday, Judge:

Tried by general court-martial, accused pleaded guilty to false swearing, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934, and other offenses. He was duly convicted and sentenced, and intermediate appellate authorities thereafter affirmed. We granted his petition for review in order to consider the same issue raised in United States v Whitaker, 13 USCMA 341, 32 CMR 341.

Our decision in the last mentioned case is dispositive of the question here involved.

The decision of the board of review, therefore, is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

For the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Whitaker, 13 USCMA 341, 32 CMR 341, I would reverse the decision of the board of review, and order the charge of false swearing dismissed.
#### Virginia Young, Petitioner *v.*Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.

Argued August 24, 1981,

before Judges Rogers, Blatt and MaoPhail,. sitting as a panel of three.

*619
      *E. J. Julian,*for petitioner.

*Charles G. Hasson,*Associate Counsel, with him *Richard Wagner,*Counsel, and *Richard L. Cole, Jr.,*Chief Counsel, for respondent.

September 17, 1981:

Per Curiam,

The appellant, an unemployment compensation claimant, contends that the compensation authorities erred in denying her compensation on the ground that she had voluntarily quit her employment as a school cafeteria worker without necessitous and compelling cause. The reason given by the claimant for quitting her work was that cold water affected her condition of arthritis. At the referee’s hearing, her school district employer adduced substantial evidence in the form of testimony of school supervisors that there was cafeteria work not involving having her hands in cold water to which the claimant could have been assigned if she had asked for other work. An unemployment compensation claimant who assigns health as a reason for quitting her employment is required to show, *inter alia,*that she requested her employer for other work which would be within her limitations. *Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review,*475 Pa. 547, *620381 A.2d 132 (1977). The appellant failed in this requirement.

Order affirmed.

Per Curiam Order

And Now, this 17th day of September, 1981, the order of the Board of Review dated April 7, 1980, is affirmed.

Per Curiam Amended Order

And Now, this 21st day of September, 1981, the Per Curiam Order filed September 17, 1981, in the above-captioned case is hereby amended to read as follows:

And Now, this 17th day of September, 1981 the order of the Board of Review dated June 6, 1980, is affirmed.
Before the Second Division,

June 8, 1960

No. 64279.

protest 59/30841 (New York).

#### S. P. Skinner Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of log fires similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *S. P. Skinner Co., Inc.*(46 C.C.P.A. 105, C.A.D. 708), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dr. Sanjay K. Jha, Chief Executive Officer, Motorola Mobility
Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the Annual Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Motorola Mobility
Holdings, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Dated: February 18, 2011



/s/ Sanjay K. JhaDr. Sanjay K. JhaChief Executive OfficerMotorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6676

NOEL EDWARD PLUNKETT, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN F. FANELLO, former warden, and individually; ED C. JACOBSEN, former unit manager and

individually; ROLAND E. WILLIAMS, Health Services Administrator and individually; LUIS A.

CALVO, Assistant Health Services Administrator

and individually; BERNARDO PARINA, Clinical

Director and individually; OTHERS AS YET

UNKNOWN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-95-3027-23JC)

Submitted: October 7, 1997 Decided: October 20, 1997

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Noel Edward Plunkett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier

Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Plunkett v. Fanello, No.

CA-95-3027-23JC (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 1997). We also deny Appellant's

pending motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Doran, President and Chief Executive Officer of Doranetti Music Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Doranetti Music Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 6, 2006

/s/ Christopher Doran	Christopher Doran
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2007199EN.01002505.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 June 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-91/07) (1)

1

(2007/C 199/45)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 14.4.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In connection with the accompanying yearly Report on Form 10-K of  GSP - 2, INC., for the year ending December 31, 2010, I, Yushan Wei, CEO and CFOof GSP - 2, INC. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
  1. Such yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in such yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GSP - 2, INC.
   GSP-2, INC.Date:  March 31, 2011
By:
/s/ Yushan WeiYushan WeiPresidentPrincipal Executive and Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Roscoe H. Mullis, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on form 10-QSB of First National Banc, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have: 

 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 24, 2004
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ending September      30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ended September 30, 2008, fairly represents in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      355, Inc. |

| Date:      November 7, 2008                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                       |
| 355,      Inc.                                                             |
|                                                                       |
| By: /s/      Alex      Jen                                            |
| Alex      Jen Chief      Executive OfficerChief      FinancialOfficer |
Before the Second Division,

August 24, 1942

No. 47474.

#### Protests 15066-K, etc., of L. Greenberg & Son (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

A sample of the merchandise was admitted in evidence. The plaintiffs offered in evidence the testimony of two witnesses, one of whom testified that the articles in question are used at carnivals and picnics throughout the country, to hang up in the back of automobiles, and that he had never seen them used by children. The second witness for the plaintiffs testified that he sells such articles throughout the metropolitan area at wholesale and that he sells to carnival and concession supply outfits. He further testified that it is a decorative article, used in an automobile, as an attachment to a cane, which is given away at concessions, at carnivals, or in weighing machines; and that he had never seen them used by children. Plaintiffs also called as a witness the United States examiner who testified that the articles are not plated or colored with gold lacquer, and that he is at present classifying such articles as manu*398factures of metal, not plated, in compliance with instructions in T. D. 50155. He also testified that the articles in question are not plated or colored with a gold lacquer, and that they were classified prior to the/promulgation of said T. D. 50155. On the record presented the ducks in question were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as claimed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that
(i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                                 
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lisa F. Campbell                                                            
|                      |  |     |  | Lisa F. Campbell                                                                
|                      |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Rio Grande

Rio Grande

Rio Grande

Kopernik

Shores

Monica

Loma del

Burro

Loma

Plata Loma de los

Tequios

Loma de la

Estrella

Loma de los

Tequios

Loma del

Burro

Loma de la

Lena Seca

Loma de los

Ebanitos

Loma de

la Pita

Loma de

las Vacas

Mesa del

Gavilan

Mouth of

Rio Grande

StellLind Banco

Number 128

Boca

Chica

Beach

Tarpon

Bend

Port

Isabel

Laguna

Vista

Mouth

of Rio

Grande

Palmito

Hill

Southmost

OE E

97°07'30"

57'

55' 55'

30" 57'30"

07'

30"

12'

15'

30"

52' 52'

97°

26°00'

97°

97°

25° 30"

10'

00'

30"

30"

26°

10'

25°

15'

12'

1 000 FEET

FEET

430

1 400 000 E

28

6

6

28

28

6

28

6

28

28

000m 6

28

6 6

28

28

28

28

6

6 6

28

28

28

000m

28

6

6

28

000m

28

28

6

28

28

6 6

28

28

6

28

6 6

6 6 000m

28

6 6

6

28

6

28

87

84

83

75

76

64 N

81 85

71

78

64

77

69

82

76

70

66

68

65

76

70

79 80 85

80 87

72

76 E 79 83

73

74

77

71

N

82

72

69

67

78

73

86

74

65

75

68

66

86

67

81 84

FEET

000

000

490

FEET

16

16

520

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2597-443

MOUTH OF RIO GRANDE, TX-TAM

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

MOUTH OF RIO GRANDE QUADRANGLE

TEXAS-TAMAULIPAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2006

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2009

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 47 ́

14 MILS

4° 32 ́

81 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

PP

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6729

TRAYVON STRANGE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex , Respondent

- Appellee,

and RALPH TERRY, Warden , Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Bluefield

. David A. Faber , Senior District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv - 00402 )

Submitted : November 18, 2021 Decided: November 19, 2021

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Trayvon Strange , Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERA L, Charleston, West Virginia , for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Trayvon Strange seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Strange ’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certifi cate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Strange has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Strange’s motion for the appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argum ent because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED