alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2014 (the Report) of Direxion Shares ETF Trust II
(the Registrant) and each of its Funds, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Daniel D. ONeill, the Principal Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                     |  |  |  |        |  |                                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 27, 2015 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Daniel D. ONeill                                   
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Daniel D. ONeill                                       
|                     |  |  |  | Title: |  | Principal Executive Officer Direxion Shares ETF
Trust II
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Michael P. Huseby, the Chief Financial Officer of CCH II, LLC and CCH
II Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Michael P. Huseby

Michael P. HusebyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)May 17, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Diversey Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 1, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers
knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 15, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Edward F. Lonergan                              
|                        |  |  |  | Edward F. Lonergan                                  
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ Norman Clubb                                    
|                        |  |  |  | Norman Clubb                                        
|                        |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
SCWC-12-0000477

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I 

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

UBALDO A. CRUZ, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-12-0000477; CR. NO. 09-1-1724)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTIORARI PROCEEDING

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon further consideration of the records and files in

this case, it appearing that the writ of certiorari herein was

improvidently granted,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this certiorari proceeding is

dismissed. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 3, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000477

03-APR-2018

02:42 PM
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Peyton R. Patterson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer hereby certify that NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.

|   |   | /s/ Peyton R. Patterson              |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |   | Peyton R. Patterson                  |
|   |   | Chairman of the Board, President and |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer              |

Date: July 28, 2008

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS AS OF SEP-30-1995 AND THE
STATEMENT OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEP-30-1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,374,294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,374,294
<PP&E>                                      28,267,655
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,136,316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,505,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,131,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,505,633
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,131,162
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               600,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                531,162
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   531,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .112
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .112

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 10542)

#### Santa Clause Programs, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 710006; 753301; 737793.

(Decided June 18, 1963)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, attached to and made a part of this decision, have been submitted on the following stipulation of counsel for the parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto:

> 1. That the merchandise the subject of the above enumerated reappraisement appeals consists of earthenware exported from Japan.

> 2. That said merchandise is not included in the Final List (T.D. 54521), published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 3. That at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation for exportation to the United States, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values less the item of Buying Commission as given on the invoices.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the reappraisement appeals herein may be submitted on this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as 'an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for determination of the values of the merchandise, covered by the entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values of the respective items of merchandise are the appraised values, less the item of buying commission, all as shown *519on the invoices which are included in the official papers filed with the court in the several suits.

Judgment will be entered ‘accordingly.
----

Exhibit 31.2 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

I, Terence Yap, certify that: 

1. 

I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Security & Surveillance Technology,Inc.; 

2. 

Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

3. 

Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

4. 

The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) 

Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) 

Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

(c) 

Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. 

The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) 

All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) 

Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007 

/s/ Terence Yap                                Terence Yap Chief Financial Officer 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51360

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAGDELENO REYMUNDO RIVAS-HERNANDEZ, also known as Reynaldo

Garcia, also known as Magdaleno Rivas, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-685-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit

Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Magdeleno

Reymundo Rivas-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2007247EN.01003401.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/34

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2007 — Commission v Chatziioannidou

(Case T-20/07) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Officials - Pensions - Annulment at first instance of Commission decisions calculating the number of years of pensionable service - Transfer of national pension rights)

(2007/C 247/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Eleni Chatziioannidou (Auderghem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 14 November 2006 in Case F-100/05 Chatziioannidou v Commission (not yet published in the ECR) seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Chatziioannidou

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.

1

---
DAN BENISHEK M.D. 

FIRST DISTRICT. MICHIGAN 

514 CANNON HOUSE 0l"FICE BUilDING 

WASHINGTON. DC 20515·2201 

(202) 225-4735 

W>WI BENISHEK.HOUSE GOII 

September 18, 2014 

Anthony Foxx 

({ongress of tiJe mtnitrb ~tates 

our;e of 3L\rpresentatiurs 

Secretary of Transportation 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

RE: Docket Number FAA-2014-0629 

Mr. Secretary: 

COMMITTEE ON r,GRiCUL TURF 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAl. RESOURCES 

COMMITTEE 0'1 V'"T'':RANS' AF"AiRS 

P,s you are aware, Aetas Group Inc. (AGI) filed a petition with the FAA on August 19, 2014 seeking an 

exemption pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) to 

conduct commercial small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS) operations. I write today in support of this 

petition, which will allow AGI to perform operations that include aerial inspections of petrochemical 

plant infrastructure and environmental monitoring. 

It is my understanding that, if approved, AGI's operations would be conducted in predetermined, 

preapproved. airspace over unpopulated industria I areas. In addition, all jobs would be performed 

during daylight hours, at a maximum altitude of 400 feet, by licensed FAA airmen. 

By authorizing AGI to conduct inspections and environmental monitoring of petrochemical facilities 

using sUAS, significant improvements to environmental and operational risk would be realized industry· 

wide due to enhanced monitoring capability and quality. 

For these and many other reasons, I urge the FAA to adopt this petition. Should you have any additional 

questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Michelle Lane in my office at 

michelle.lane@mail.house.gov or (202)225-4735. 

Sincerely, 

ijn~ Dan Benishek M.D. 

Member of Congress 

Michigan's First District 

"' S10-140929E013' PRINTEO IN MICHIGAN ON CH GAN \1fll.JE PAPER.
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION






Exhibit 10(a)

  




April 19, 2001

 




Board of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 201 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223

 




Directors:

 




    We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 3
to the registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-41577) filed by Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company and Variable Annuity Account A of Protective Life with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

 














Sincerely,



SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP



By: /s/ DAVID S. GOLDSTEIN  








David S. Goldstein
No. 48647.

#### Protests 34672-K, etc., of Santo Alioto & Sons et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146. The protests were therefore sustained.
# C_2007137EN.01000602.xml

| 21.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4600 — TUI/First Choice)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 137/05)

On 4 June 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4600. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4600. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Donna H. Kelley, Chief Financial Officer of Bainbridge Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bainbridge Bancshares, Inc. forthe quarter ended March 31, 2004; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 17, 2004