alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with Amendment
No. 1 to the Annual Report of SP Bancorp, Inc. (Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigneds knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                       |  |                                                     
|-------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|April 30, 2014 |  | /s/ Jeffrey L. Weaver
|Date           |  |                       |  | Jeffrey L. Weaver                                   
|               |  |                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|               | 
|April 30, 2014 |  | /s/ Suzanne C. Salls 
|Date           |  |                       |  | Suzanne C. Salls                                    
|               |  |                       |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2007269EN.01004101.xml

| 10.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/41

---

Composition of the Grand Chamber

(2007/C 269/71)

On 19 September 2007, the Court of First Instance decided, in accordance with Article 10(1) of the Rules of Procedure, that for the period from 25 September 2007 to 31 August 2010 the 13 Judges of whom the Grand Chamber is composed shall be the President of the Court, the seven Presidents of those Chambers not entrusted with the case, and the Judges of the Chamber, Extended Composition, which would have had to sit in the case in question if it had been assigned to a Chamber composed of five Judges.

---
DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


$45,000                Date: July 31, 2000


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to
the order of Michael F. Pope, the sum of Forty Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000),
together with interest of 0% per annum on the unpaid balance. The entire unpaid
principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON
DEMAND of any holder thereof.

     Upon default in making payment within 15 days of demand, and provided this
note is turned over for collection, the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable
legal fees and costs of collection to the extent permitted by law. This note
shall take effect as a sealed instrument and be enforced in accordance with the
laws of the payee's state. All parties to this note waive presentment, notice of
non-payment, protest and notice of protest, and agree to remain fully bound
notwithstanding the release of any party, extension or modification of terms, or
discharge of any collateral for this note.

     In the presence of:

/s/ Michael F. Pope                   By: /s/ Philip C. La Puma
-----------------------                   -------------------------------
Witness                                   Philip C. La Puma for
                                          Time Lending, California
#### J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc., for account of Pittrade, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7365.

Invoices dated London, England, November 3, 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 8, 1946, etc.

Entry No. 731864, etc.

(Decided August 26, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar eases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2007140EN.01001001.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 26 March 2007 — Ampliscientifica Srl, Amplifin SpA v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate

(Case C-162/07)

(2007/C 140/17)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

La Corte Suprema di Cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Ampliscientifica Srl, Amplifin SpA

Applicants:

Defendants: Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate

Defendants:

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the last paragraph of Article 4(4) of Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977 be construed as a rule that is insufficiently precise, with the effect that the Member States are permitted to apply the VAT scheme set out in that rule to specific situations involving economic, financial or legal links among different persons, or as a rule that is sufficiently precise and which, therefore, once a Member State has decided to adopt that scheme, requires provision to be made for it to be applied in all cases involving the links set out in that rule? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the last paragraph of Article 4(4) of Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977 be construed as a rule that is insufficiently precise, with the effect that the Member States are permitted to apply the VAT scheme set out in that rule to specific situations involving economic, financial or legal links among different persons, or as a rule that is sufficiently precise and which, therefore, once a Member State has decided to adopt that scheme, requires provision to be made for it to be applied in all cases involving the links set out in that rule?

1

| 2. | (i) Regardless of the reply to be given to question (1), is the imposition of a temporal restriction — in the sense that the link must have existed for a significant period of time — as a precondition for the application of the scheme, where the persons concerned are not permitted to demonstrate that there is a valid economic reason for the link being forged, disproportionate in relation to the objectives of the directive and to the need for compliance with the principle prohibiting the abuse of rights? (ii) Is that legislation to be regarded in any event as contrary to the principle of the neutrality of VAT? |
| --- | --- |

2.

(i) Regardless of the reply to be given to question (1), is the imposition of a temporal restriction — in the sense that the link must have existed for a significant period of time — as a precondition for the application of the scheme, where the persons concerned are not permitted to demonstrate that there is a valid economic reason for the link being forged, disproportionate in relation to the objectives of the directive and to the need for compliance with the principle prohibiting the abuse of rights? (ii) Is that legislation to be regarded in any event as contrary to the principle of the neutrality of VAT?

---

(1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1

1

---
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:   (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/   Roy T. K. Thung
Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: November 10, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   1
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# If it's not safe, say so: NASA safety reporting system

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  If it's not safe, say so: NASA safety reporting system 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  171 × 56 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  021019332.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Case: 2:11-cv-00407-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/21/12 Page: 1 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00407-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/21/12 Page: 2 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00407-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/21/12 Page: 3 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00407-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/21/12 Page: 4 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00407-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/21/12 Page: 5 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00407-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/21/12 Page: 6 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00407-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/21/12 Page: 7 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00407-EAS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/21/12 Page: 8 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T17:29:17-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 13.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
MOKO Social Media Limited (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2016
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                 | MOKO SOCIAL MEDIA LIMITED
|---------------- | -------------------------
|                 |                          
|October 31, 2016 | By:                      
|                 | Name:                    
|                 | Title:                   
|                 |                          
|                 |                          
|October 31, 2016 | By:                      
|                 | Name:                    
|                 | Title:                   
|                 |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2019

No. 04-18-00840-CR

Isaac CARDENAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR10269

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Second Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to July 17, 2019. Further requests for extensions of time in 

which to file the State’s brief will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of June, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE
STATEMENT OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,100,541
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,100,541
<PP&E>                                      28,267,655
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,426,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,941,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,864,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     841,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,941,915
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,201,062
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               600,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,601,062        
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,601,062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.547
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.547
        

</TABLE>
# C_2007199EN.01000602.xml

| 25.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 July 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark)) — Hans Markus Kofoed v Skatteministeriet

(Case C-321/05) (1)

1

(Directive 90/434/EEC - Common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares - National decision to tax an exchange of shares - Exchange of shares - Distribution of a dividend shortly afterwards - Abuse of rights)

(2007/C 199/09)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hans Markus Kofoed

Applicant:

Defendant: Skatteministeriet

Defendant:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Østre Landsret — Interpretation of Article 2(d) of Council Directive 90/434/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States (OJ 1990 L 225, p. 1) — Exchange of shares followed immediately by a distribution of dividends by the acquiring company, the amount of which exceeds 10 % of the nominal value of the shares exchanged

Operative part of the judgment

In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, a dividend, such as that paid, is not to be included in the calculation of the ‘cash payment’ provided for in Article 2(d) of Council Directive 90/434/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States and that, accordingly, an exchange of shares such as that in issue constitutes an ‘exchange of shares’ within the meaning of Article 2(d) of that directive.

Consequently, Article 8(1) of Directive 90/434 precludes, in principle, the taxation of such an exchange of shares, unless national rules on abuse of rights, tax evasion or tax avoidance may be interpreted in accordance with Article 11(1)(a) of Directive 90/434 and thus justify the taxation of that exchange.

---

(1)  OJ C 257, 15.10.2005.

1

---
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Steven C. McNeal, Vice President and Treasurer of Entergy Arkansas, LLC (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Storm Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of August 18, 2010 between Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 28, 2019





Entergy Arkansas, LLC, as servicer


By:  /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:  Vice President and Treasurer
# C_2007183EN.01003301.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/33

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 7 June 2007 — IMS v Commission

(Case T-346/06 R)

(Applications for interim measures - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Directive 98/37/EC - Admissibility - Prima facie case - Urgency - Balancing of the interests involved)

(2007/C 183/64)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Industria Masetto Schio Srl (IMS) (Schio, Italy) (represented by: F. Colonna and T. Romolotti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Zadra and D. Lawunmi, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for the suspension of operation of Commission Opinion C (2006) 3914 of 6 September 2006 concerning a prohibition measure adopted by the French authorities relating to certain IMS brand mechanical presses.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The operation of Commission Opinion C(2006) 3914 of 6 December 2006 concerning a prohibition measure adopted by the French authorities relating to certain IMS brand mechanical presses is suspended until the Court of First Instance has ruled on the action in the main proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The operation of Commission Opinion C(2006) 3914 of 6 December 2006 concerning a prohibition measure adopted by the French authorities relating to certain IMS brand mechanical presses is suspended until the Court of First Instance has ruled on the action in the main proceedings.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---