alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered July 2, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00323
- CR MARCUS WAYNE HARPER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 296th Ju dicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 81699
- 2018



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s July 1, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file
his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before Ju ly 31, 2019. Appellant is cautioned that the failure to file his brief by that date may result in the appeal being abated for a hearing under appellate rule 38.8(b)(3). T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(b)(3).

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
(Reap. Dec. 10540)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 914.

(Decided June 18, 1963)

*Stein & Shostah*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*516Donlon, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement enumerated on the attached Schedule, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of bamboo blinds, etc., manufactured by Hasegawa Blinds Factory, and exported from Japan.

> That all the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement was entered after February 27,1958.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise the subject of the appeal for reappraisement eumerated in the attached Schedule is not included on the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, required to be valued in accordance with Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced unit values, net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal for reap-praisement may be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise manufactured by Plasegawa Blinds Factory, described on the invoice covered by this entry in this appeal for reappraisement, and that such values of the respective items of merchandise are the invoiced unit values, net, packed, all as shown on the invoice which is included in the official papers filed with the court in this suit.

As to all other merchandise, this appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Charles B. Preston, App’lt, *v.*Solomon Alexander, Resp’t.

Order reversed with printing disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8898 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8898

  To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a 
   study on grocery costs to United States consumers, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2024

 Mr. Molinaro (for himself, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Ciscomani, and Mr. Davis of 
 North Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a 
   study on grocery costs to United States consumers, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lower Grocery Prices Act''.

SEC. 2. GAO STUDY ON GROCERY COSTS TO U.S. CONSUMERS.

    (a) Study.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall 
conduct a study on the changes in the Consumer Price Index for food at 
home for the 20-year period ending on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, including such other relevant economic metrics as may be necessary 
to assess the impact of food at home costs on United States consumers.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall submit a report to the appropriate committees of Congress that 
contains--
            (1) the Comptroller General's findings from the study 
        conducted under subsection (a); and
            (2) the Comptroller General's recommendations to help lower 
        food at home costs for United States consumers.
    (c) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.--In this Act, the 
term ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means the following 
committees:
            (1) The Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 
        Representatives.
            (2) The Committee on Financial Services of the House of 
        Representatives.
            (3) The Committee on Finance of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 8487)

#### Jung Forwarding Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 837195, etc.

(Decided October 14, 1955)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel, subject to the approval of the court:

> 1 — That the merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of artists’ materials and supplies imported from Holland.

> 2 — That the issues in the said appeals are the same in all material respects as the issues in the case of *United States*v. *International Expediters, Inc., for Winsor & Newton, Inc.,*40 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 148 (C. A. D. 511), wherein it was held that cost of production, as defined in Sec. 402 (f), Tariff Act of 1930, was the proper basis of appraisement, and that the record in the said case may be incorporated in the record in the instant appeals.

> 3 — That, as to the items of the aforesaid merchandise entered at the invoice unit prices plus 20 per cent, the said cost of production is represented by the invoice unit prices plus 11.11 per cent.

> 4 — That as to all other items of the said merchandise, except those referred to in paragraph 5 of this stipulation, said cost of production is represented by the appraised values less 25 per cent.

> *4245 — The appeals for reappraisement herein are abandoned as to items entered at the invoice unit prices plus 10 per cent and plus 8 per cent.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for reappraisement herein may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

As to the items of merchandise entered at the invoice unit prices, plus 20 per centum, such values were the invoice unit prices, plus 11.11 per centum.

As to all other items of merchandise involved, except as to the merchandise covered by the abandonment noted below, such values were the appraised values, less 25 per centum.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to items of merchandise entered at the invoice unit prices, plus 10 per centum, plus 8 per centum, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2006-24467; Airspace Docket No. 06-ANM-2]
RIN 2120-AA66


Revision of Class E Airspace; Eagle, CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This technical amendment corrects a final rule published in 
the Federal Register on August 11, 2006 (71 FR 46077), Docket No. FAA-
2006-24467, Airspace Docket No. 06-ANM-2. In that rule, the reference 
to FAA Order 7400.9 was published as FAA Order 7400.9N. The correct 
reference is FAA Order 7400.9P. Also, the corresponding dates that 
refer to the Order should state `` * * * September 1, 2006, and 
effective September 15, 2006 * * *'' instead of `` * * * September 1, 
2005, and effective September 15, 2005''. This technical amendment 
corrects those errors.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, April 5, 2007. The Director of the Federal 
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR 
part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tameka Bentley, Airspace and Rules, 
Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone: (202) 267-8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    On August 11, 2006, a final rule was published in the Federal 
Register, Docket No. FAA-2006-24467, Airspace Docket No. 06-ANM-2, that 
amended Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations part 71 by revising Class 
E Airspace; Eagle, CO (71 FR 46077). In that rule, the reference to FAA 
Order 7400.9 was published as FAA Order 7400.9N. The correct reference 
is FAA Order 7400.9P. In addition, the corresponding dates that refer 
to the Order are incorrect. Instead of ``* * * September 1, 2005, and 
effective September 15, 2005'', the dates should read `` * * * 
September 1, 2006, and effective September 15, 2006''.

Amendment to Final Rule

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the reference 
to FAA Order 7400.9 for Docket No. FAA-2006-24467, Airspace Docket No. 
06-ANM-2, as published in the Federal Register on August 11, 2006 (71 
FR 46077), is corrected as follows:
0
On page 46078, column 1, lines 39, 40, and 41, and column 2, lines 34, 
36, and 37, amend the language to read:


Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

* * * * *
    `` * * * FAA Order 7400.9P '' instead of ``FAA Order 7400.9N * * * 
''
    `` * * * September 1, 2006, and effective September 15, 2006 * * * 
'' instead of `` September 1, 2005, and effective September 15, 2005 * 
* * ''
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, March 23, 2007.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace and Rules.
 [FR Doc. E7-6297 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
(Reap. Dec. 8910)

Entry No. 754165-1/2.

#### D. Hauser, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided July 10, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise covered by Consular Invoice #5233 at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the invoice unit values plus cost of packing plus 2% and that the export value, as it applies to merchandise covered by Consular Invoice #5220, was the invoice unit values plus 2%.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

*574On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

As to the merchandise covered by consular invoice 5233, the invoice unit values, plus cost of packing, plus 2 per centum.

As to the merchandise covered by consular invoice 5220, the invoice unit values, plus 2 per centum.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8976 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8976

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 20 West White Street in Millstadt, Illinois, as the ``Corporal 
                    Matthew A. Wyatt Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL MATTHEW A. WYATT POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 20 West White Street in Millstadt, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Corporal Matthew A. Wyatt Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Matthew A. Wyatt Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 8976

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 20 West White Street in Millstadt, Illinois, as the ``Corporal 
                    Matthew A. Wyatt Post Office''.
```
# C_2007159EN.01000401.xml

| 12.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 July 2007

(2007/C 159/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3753 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 167,39 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4395 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67695 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1663 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6535 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9655 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5841 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,475 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,83 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6966 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7745 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,1352 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,377 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7830 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5963 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4569 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7501 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7719 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0839 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 264,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7000 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4015 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2885 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 422,40 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7468 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,470 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,1150 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,153 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3753

JPY

Japanese yen

167,39

DKK

Danish krone

7,4395

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67695

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1663

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6535

ISK

Iceland króna

83,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9655

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5841

CZK

Czech koruna

28,475

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,83

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6966

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7745

RON

Romanian leu

3,1352

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,377

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7830

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5963

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4569

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7501

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7719

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0839

KRW

South Korean won

1 264,24

ZAR

South African rand

9,7000

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4015

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2885

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 422,40

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7468

PHP

Philippine peso

63,470

RUB

Russian rouble

35,1150

THB

Thai baht

42,153

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 1023 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM042AD

747 - 53 - 2088, R3 --- 9/8/94

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
# C_2007177EN.01000301.xml

| 31.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 July 2007

(2007/C 177/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3659 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 161,58 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4408 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6753 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1945 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6437 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 84,96 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,025 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,56 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6966 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8096 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,1702 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,543 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7947 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6121 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,46 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6881 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8048 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,069 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 261,2 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,799 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3363 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3135 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 579,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7294 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,012 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,95 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,704 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3659

JPY

Japanese yen

161,58

DKK

Danish krone

7,4408

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6753

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1945

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6437

ISK

Iceland króna

84,96

NOK

Norwegian krone

8

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

28,025

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,56

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6966

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8096

RON

Romanian leu

3,1702

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,543

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7947

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6121

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,46

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6881

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8048

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,069

KRW

South Korean won

1 261,2

ZAR

South African rand

9,799

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3363

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3135

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 579,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7294

PHP

Philippine peso

62,012

RUB

Russian rouble

34,95

THB

Thai baht

40,704

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
PROMISSORY
NOTE

|$10,000 | April 24, 2011
|------- | --------------



FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE
CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Queensridge Mining Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
(“Maker”) hereby promises to pay to the order of The Stromer Family, PKS Trust (“Holder”) the sum of TEN
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000). This Note shall bear interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum. All principal and interest
due hereunder shall be paid on or before April 24, 2013.

Maker hereby waives presentment,
dishonor, notice of dishonor and protest. All parties hereto consent to, and Holder is expressly authorized to make, without notice,
any and all renewals, extensions, modifications, or waivers of the time for or the terms of payment of any sum or sums due hereunder,
or under any documents or instruments relating to or securing this Note, or of the performance of any covenants, conditions or
agreements hereof or thereof or the taking or release of collateral securing this Note. Any such action by Holder shall not discharge
the liability of any party to this Note.

This Note shall be governed
by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada without regard to conflict of law principles. Maker shall
also pay Holder any and all costs of collection incurred in connection with this Note, including court costs and reasonable attorney’s
fees.

Queensridge Mining Resources,
Inc.

By: /s/ Phillip Stromer

Phillip Stromer,
President and CEO