alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10041 USDC No. 3:95-CV-950-H

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CESAR OMAR MARTINEZ, a/k/a Jose Sanchez, a/k/a La Cotorra, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - January 15, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Cesar Martinez (federal inmate #23582-077) has applied to this court for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. Martinez contends that he is entitled to relief on grounds (1) of incorrect applications of the Sentencing Guidelines, and (2) that his guilty plea was induced by his counsel’s false promise andNo. 96-10041 - 2 - incorrect advice concerning the sentence he would receive.

IT IS ORDERED that leave to appeal IFP is DENIED, because Martinez’s appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. If this court were to hold that a certificate of appealability (COA) is required in a case such as this, COA would be denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
# C_2007140EN.01002402.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 3 May 2007 — Polimeri Europa v Commission

(Case T-12/07 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Application for further interim measures - Order addressed to third parties - Inadmissibility)

(2007/C 140/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Polimeri Europa SpA (Brindisi, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, F. Moretti and L. Nascimbene, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci, F. Amato and V. Bottka, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for interim measures requesting, first, an order requiring the Commission to prohibit Manufacture Française des Pneumatiques Michelin, on pain of a penalty, from using in any way or for any purpose whatsoever the information contained in the non-confidential version of the statement of objections of 6 April 2006 adopted in proceedings under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.638 — Butadiene Rubber (BR) and Emulsion Styrene Butadiene Rubber (ESBR)) which was forwarded to that company as a result of the Commission's decision COMP/F2/D (2006) 1095 of 6 November 2006 and, secondly, an order that the Commission forward to Manufacture Française des Pneumatiques Michelin a copy of the order to be given and, lastly, such other or further measures as the President of the Court may deem necessary.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16775-16776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-364-000]


Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Tariff Filing and Non-
Conforming Service Agreement

March 30, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 23, 2007, Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C. 
(Destin) tendered for filing with the

[[Page 16776]]

Commission as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, 
Second Revised Sheet No. 258, with an effective date of April 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Sec.  154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone 
filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on 
the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before 
the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#df999a8d9c90b1b3b6b1ba8caaafafb0adab9fb9baadbcf1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e8aeadbaaba7868481868dbb9d9898879a9ca88e8d9a8bc68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6330 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8854 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the provision of certain 

additional burial benefits for individuals for whom an urn or plaque 

is furnished, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2024 

Mr. YAKYM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

provision of certain additional burial benefits for individuals for whom an urn or plaque is furnished, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Veterans’ 

5 Final Resting Place Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8854 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PROVISION 

2 OF ADDITIONAL BURIAL BENEFITS WHEN 

3 COST OF URN OR PLAQUE IS REIMBURSED. 

4 Section 2306(h) of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘If the Sec7 retary’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in para8 graph (3), if the Secretary’’; 

9 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through 

10 (5) as paragraphs (4) through (6), respectively; and 

11 (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol12 lowing new paragraph (3): 

13 ‘‘(3) Paragraph (2) shall not apply with respect to 

14 an urn or plaque furnished under paragraph (1) on or 

15 after January 5, 2021, if a non-Department entity reim16 burses the Secretary for the cost of the urn or plaque.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2





Certification Pursuant to Section
13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Paul C. Schmidt (UpSNAP Chief
Financial Officer)





I, Paul
C. Schmidt, certify that:





1.  I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 of
UpSNAP, Inc. (“registrant”);





2.  Based on
my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;





4.  The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and board of directors:
:





a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information (all of which do not apply); and





b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls (all of which do
not apply).





Date:
February 14, 2008











/s/ Paul C.
Schmidt


Paul C.
Schmidt


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
SORRELsluDASHENIANTON 

Attorneys and Counselors at Law 

Clerk of the Court 

Court of Criminal Appeals 

Supreme Court Building 

201 West 14th Street, Room 106 

Austin, Texas 78701 

October 26, 2015 

Re: Ex Parte Shelton Montgomery 

Case No. WR-83,375-01 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

BRUCE ANTON BOARD CERTIFIED-CRIMIML LAW and CRIMINAL APPELLATE LAW 

TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION 

ba@sualaw.com 

23 11 Cedar Springs Rd. 

Suite 250 

Dallas, TX 7520 1 

214.468.8100 

fax 214.468.8104 

www.sualaw.com 

Please be advised that I will be filing objections in the above-referenced matter. Please 

abstain from ruling in this matter for at least 30 days, or until November 25, 2015 to provide 

counsel for the Applicant viable time to file objections. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me should you have any questions 

or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Bruce Anton 

cc: Luke M. Inman, l001

h Judicial District Attorney's Office 

f 

WR-83,375-01

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 10/26/2015 10:40:33 AM

Accepted 10/26/2015 10:58:30 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

 RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 10/26/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  May 6, 2008
    
    /s/ Richard J. JarosinskiDate
    
    Richard J. Jarosinski, President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 6, 2008
    
    /s/ John N. PesarsickDate
    
    John N. Pesarsick, Chief Financial Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 15, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-16241

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

Agency No. A071-534-087

EFRAIN TAX LOPEZ,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

________________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

_________________________

(May 15, 2009)

Before CARNES, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Efrain Tax Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of
the BIA’s judgment affirming the IJ’s denial of his application for asylum and

withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§

1158 and 1231, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), 8 C.F.R.

§ 208.16(c).

Tax illegally entered the United States in the late 1980s. After applying for

asylum in 1991, Tax returned to Guatemala at least twice, in 1991 and 1996.

Accordingly, after a hearing in August 2007, the IJ denied Tax’s application for

asylum and withholding of removal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.8(a) (“An applicant who

leaves the United States without first obtaining advance parole . . . shall be

presumed to have abandoned his or her application [for asylum, withholding of

removal, or CAT relief] under this section.”). Tax appealed the IJ’s judgment to

the BIA. The BIA adopted and affirmed the IJ’s decision and noted specifically its

“agreement with the Immigration Judge’s conclusion that respondent abandoned

his asylum application when he departed the United States without first obtaining

advance parole.” Tax now petitions for review of the BIA’s decision.

It is clear that the IJ and BIA denied Tax’s application because he failed to

overcome the presumption that traveling abroad without obtaining advance parole

abandons a petition for asylum and withholding of removal. See 8 C.F.R. §§

1208.8; 1208.1(a). Yet, in his brief to this Court, Tax fails to address that issue or

even to mention it. Instead, his brief focuses exclusively on Tax’s allegations of

2
persecution in Guatemala.

An appellant’s brief must set forth his “contentions and the reasons for them,

with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant

relies.” Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9)(A). Because Tax has failed to make any

argument that his travel abroad did not abandon his asylum application, his brief is

insufficient to raise that claim and the issue is abandoned. See, e.g., Sepulveda v.

U.S. Attorney Gen., 401 F.3d 1226, 1228 n.2 (11th Cir. 2005) (“When an appellant

fails to offer argument on an issue, that issue is abandoned.”).

In sum, Tax has made no argument that the BIA and IJ erred in deeming his

application abandoned. Therefore we dismiss Tax’s petition for review.

PETITION DISMISSED.

3
_________________________________________ 

 

 

___________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

August 26, 2008 

136906 

WAYNE LAFOUNTAIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

 SC: 136906 

 CoA: 285464 

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of July 18, 2008, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 26, 2008 

Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:11-cr-226

Gerald L. Robinson 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 19) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: October 24, 2011 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cr-00226-JLG Doc #: 21 Filed: 10/24/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 40270.

#### Protests 613130-G, etc., of E. Cerruti, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284 and T. D. 49389) and *Kraft*v. *United States*(T. D. 47955) the protests were sustained as to the weight of cheese.
# C_2007149EN.01000202.xml

| 3.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4486 — Leitner/Strabag/Nordpark)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 149/04)

On 21 June 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4486. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4486. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
No. 47486.

#### Protest 26894-G of Ciba Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel 41 percent of Albatex POC pat., and 29 percent of Silvatol I were held taxable at 3 cents per pound under section 701, Revenue Act of 1936, as claimed.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 88 ) ll-E-4 8 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:06

AM Sheet 88 of 264P. 2 

### A-94-5 2

Contac t Repor t Plasti c Composite s NESHAP From : Kennet h R . Meardon , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Date : Octobe r 1,199 6 Contact : Mr . Gar y Rodger s Company : Unite d Pane l Incorporated t v . EP A AI R DOCKE T Telephon e Number . (610 ) 588-687 1 Contac t Summary : I contacte d Mr . Rodger s t

o confir mtha t thei r facilit y use s acontinuou s laminatio n process . Mr . Rodger s indicate d tha t he would classif

y their pane l lin e a s acontinuou s laminatio n process . H

e indicate d tha

t the y us e aresi n wit

h afille r conten t o f 60 % in thi s process . The y d o not us e abotto mcarrie

r fil mno r ato p film , [materia l claime d t o b e CB I ha s bee n deleted ] Th e panel s then ar

e cure d i n a

n oven . Mr . Rodger s indicate d tha t they d o no t

us e bar s or

othe r mean s along th e side s ofth e stee l bel t to contain th e resin , bu t

tha t throug h th e resi n viscosity an d th e spee d ofth e lin e th e resi n stay s o n th e belt , [materia l claime d to b e CB I ha s bee n deleted ] Mr . Rodger s als o state d tha t they ha d installe d acontinuou s castin g lin e about 1 an d one half year s ago , base d o n hi s ow n patente d process , designe d to produc e asoli d surfac e material . [materia l claime d t o b e CB I ha s bee n deleted ] Ther

e ar e no specifi c air

pollutio n control s i n us e o n thi s line. . H

e fel t tha t th e proces s wa s "prett

y tight " an d tha

t ther e wa s hardly an

y exposed material s to th e atmospher e prio r t o polymerization . They hav e sourc e teste d th e station s along th e line . Mixin g i s conducted in totall y enclose d vessels . Mr . Rodger s indicate d tha t he wa s awar

e ofth e IP/Nevama

r proces s and patent , but

tha t their s wa s abi t

different . H e agree d t o sen d m e acopy o f

thei r patent .
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Steven H. Kane; certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Protalex, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Dated: August 20, 2004 By:  Steven H. Kane    Steven H. Kane    Chief Executive Officer