This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules. 

# Proposed Rules Federal Register 

### 1763

Vol. 78, No. 6

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

**DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE**

**Agricultural Marketing Service**

**7 CFR Part 906**

**[Doc. No. AMS–FV–12–0038; FV12–906–1 PR]** 

**Oranges and Grapefruit Grown in Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas;** 

**Increased Assessment Rate**

**AGENCY :**  Agricultural Marketing Service,

USDA.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This proposed rule would
increase the assessment rate established for the Texas Valley Citrus Committee (Committee) for the 2012–13 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.14 to $0.16 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent of oranges and grapefruit handled. The Committee locally administers the marketing order which regulates the handling of oranges and grapefruit grown in the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas (order). Assessments upon orange and grapefruit handlers are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal period begins August 1 and ends July 31. The
assessment rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received by January 22, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or Internet: http:// www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the document number and the date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this
rule will be included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet at the address provided above.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Doris Jamieson, Marketing Specialist or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Director, Southeast Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324– 3375, Fax: (863) 325–8793, or Email: Doris.Jamieson@ams.usda.gov or Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.

Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– 2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This proposed rule is issued under Marketing Agreement and Order No. 906, as amended (7 CFR part 906), regulating the handling of oranges and grapefruit grown in the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Order

12866.

This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, orange and grapefruit handlers are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate as proposed herein would be applicable to all assessable oranges and grapefruit beginning on August 1, 2012, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.

The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.

This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2012–13 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.14 to $0.16 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent of oranges and grapefruit
handled.

The Texas orange and grapefruit marketing order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are producers and handlers of Texas oranges and grapefruit. They are
familiar with the Committee’s needs and with the costs for goods and services in
their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input.

For the 2011–12 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate
that would continue in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.

The Committee met on June 5, 2012, and unanimously recommended 2012– 13 expenditures of $1,340,800 and an assessment rate of $0.16 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent of oranges and grapefruit handled. In comparison, last year’s budgeted expenditures were $1,273,537. The assessment rate of $0.16 is $0.02 higher than the rate currently in
effect. The increased assessment rate


### 1764 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 9, 2013 / Proposed Rules

should generate sufficient income to cover anticipated expenses, including an increase in advertising and promotion, as well as allow the Committee to replenish funds in its

reserves.

The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2012–13 fiscal period include $575,000 for promotion; $489,500 for the Mexican fruit fly control program; and $243,000 for management, administration, and compliance. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2011–12 were $425,000, $564,500, and $250,737, respectively.

The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of Texas oranges and grapefruit. Orange and grapefruit shipments for the 2012–13 fiscal period
are estimated at 8.5 million 7/10-bushel cartons or equivalent, which should provide $1,360,000 in assessment
income. Income derived from handler assessments would be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. Funds in the reserve (currently $78,090) would be kept within the maximum permitted by the order (approximately one fiscal period’s expenses as stated in § 906.35).

The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the
Committee or other available
information.

Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee would continue to meet prior to or during each fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express their views at these meetings.
USDA would evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would be undertaken as necessary. The Committee’s 2012–13 budget and those for subsequent fiscal periods would be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.

The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own
behalf.

There are approximately 170 producers of oranges and grapefruit in the production area and 15 handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $7,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201).

According to Committee data and
information from the National Agricultural Statistical Service, the weighted average grower price for Texas citrus during the 2010–11 season was around $11.30 per box and total shipments were near 4.7 million boxes. Using the weighted average price and shipment information, and assuming a normal distribution, the majority of growers would have annual receipts of less than $750,000. In addition, based on available information, approximately 60 percent of Texas citrus handlers
could be considered small businesses under SBA’s definition. Thus, the majority of producers and handlers of Texas citrus may be classified as small

entities.

This proposed rule would increase
the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2012–13 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.14 to $0.16 per 7/10- bushel carton or equivalent of Texas oranges and grapefruit. The Committee unanimously recommended 2012–13 expenditures of $1,340,800 and an assessment rate of $0.16 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent handled. The proposed assessment rate of $0.16 is $0.02 higher than the 2011–12 rate. The quantity of assessable oranges and grapefruit for the 2012–13 fiscal period
is estimated at 8.5 million 7/10-bushel cartons or equivalent. Thus, the $0.16 rate should provide $1,360,000 in assessment income and be adequate to meet this year’s expenses.

The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2012–13 fiscal period include $575,000 for promotion; $489,500 for the Mexican fruit fly control program; and $243,000 for management, administration, and compliance. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2011–12 were $425,000, $564,500, and $250,737, respectively.

The Committee reviewed and unanimously recommended 2012–13 expenditures of $1,340,800, which included increases in promotional
activities. The Committee considered proposed expenses and recommended increasing the assessment rate to cover the increase in the advertising and promotion program, as well as to allow the Committee to replenish funds in its

reserve.

Prior to arriving at this budget, the
Committee considered information from various sources, such as the Committee’s Budget and Personnel Committee, and the Market Development Committee. Alternative expenditure levels were discussed by these groups, based upon the relative value of various research and promotion projects to the Texas citrus industry. The assessment rate of $0.16 per 7/10- bushel carton or equivalent of assessable oranges and grapefruit was then determined by dividing the total recommended budget by the quantity of assessable oranges and grapefruit,
estimated at 8.5 million 7/10-bushel cartons or equivalent for the 2012–13 fiscal period. This is approximately $20,700 above the anticipated expenses,
which the Committee determined to be acceptable.

A review of historical information and preliminary information pertaining to the upcoming fiscal period indicates that the grower price for the 2012–13 season could range between $8.98 and $16.35 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent of oranges and grapefruit. Therefore, the estimated assessment revenue for the 2012–13 fiscal period as a percentage of total grower revenue could range between 1 and 2 percent.

This proposed action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers, the
costs are minimal and uniform on all
handlers. Some of the additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the marketing order.

In addition, the Committee’s meeting was widely publicized throughout the Texas citrus industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the June 5, 2012, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit


### 1765 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 9, 2013 / Proposed Rules

comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the order’s information collection requirements have been previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and assigned OMB No. 0581–0189 Generic Fruit Crops. No changes in those requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.

This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Texas orange and grapefruit handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies.

AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.

USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.

A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/ MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide

. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Laurel May at the previously-mentioned address in the

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
section.

A 10-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule. Ten days is deemed appropriate because: (1) The 2012–13 fiscal period began on August 1, 2012, and the marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each fiscal period apply to all assessable oranges and grapefruit handled during such fiscal period; (2) the Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses, which are incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this action, which was unanimously recommended by the Committee at a public meeting and is
similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past years.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 906

Grapefruit, Marketing agreements, Oranges, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 906 is proposed to
be amended as follows:

**PART 906—ORANGES AND**
**GRAPEFRUIT GROWN IN LOWER RIO**
**GRANDE VALLEY IN TEXAS**

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 906 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

■ 2. Section 906.235 is revised to read
as follows:

**§ 906.235 Assessment rate.**

On and after August 1, 2012, an assessment rate of $0.16 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent is established for oranges and grapefruit grown in the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas.

Dated: January 3, 2013. David R. Shipman, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing

Service.

[FR Doc. 2013–00189 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 25**

**[Docket No. FAA–2012–0812; Notice No. 13– 01]** 

**RIN 2120–AK14**

**Requirements for Chemical Oxygen Generators Installed on Transport**  **Category Airplanes**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  This rulemaking would amend the type certification requirements for chemical oxygen generators installed on transport category airplanes so the generators are secure and not subject to misuse. The
intended effect of this action would be to increase the level of security for future transport category airplane designs. This proposal does not directly affect the existing fleet.

**DATES :**  Send comments on or before March 11, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Send comments identified by docket number FAA–2012–0812 using any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.

• Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC

20590–0001.

• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

• Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202–493–2251.

Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without change,

to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of all comments received into any FAA dockets, including the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.

Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at http://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for accessing the docket or Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Jeff Gardlin, Airframe and Cabin Safety Branch, ANM–115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone: (425) 227– 2136; email: jeff.gardlin@faa.gov.

For legal questions concerning this action, contact Douglas Anderson, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of the Regional Counsel, ANM–7, Northwest Mountain Region, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone: (425) 227–2166; email: douglas.anderson@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  See the
‘‘Additional Information’’ section for
information on how to comment on this proposal and how the FAA will handle
comments received. The ‘‘Additional
Information’’ section also contains related information about the docket, privacy, the handling of proprietary or
confidential business information. In addition, there is information on obtaining copies of related rulemaking
documents.