alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 61980.

#### John E. Staren *v.*United States,

protests 189410-K, etc. (Nogales).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil*
      *574
      *Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Richard G. Berford, App’lt, *v.*The New York Iron Mine, Resp’t.

*(New York Superior Court, General Term,*

*Filed January 6, 1890.)*

Pleading—Supplemental complaint—When will not be permitted.

A plaintiff will not be permitted to file a supplemental complaint, setting up facts which did not exist at the commencement of the action, where a judgment on demurrer determining that the facts alleged in the complaint, and existing at that time, constituted no cause of action, is still in force.

Appeal from order denying motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint.

Action for an accounting of the assets of the defendant and the share therein of one Wetmore; of the liens upon said shares of Wetmore prior to that of plaintifE; that defendant be decreed to declare such dividend as may appear on such accounting to be proper, for a receiver and an injunction. On demurrer it was adjudged that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which judgment was affirmed by the general term. 21 M. Y. State Bep., 439.

*Roger M.*Sherman, for app’lt; *Frank E.*Smith, for resp’t

Freedman, J.

The judgment on the demurrer, which is still in force, determined that the facts set forth in the complaint, and existing at that time, constitute no cause of action against the defendant That being so, the plaintifE will not be permitted to file and serve a supplemental complaint, setting up facts which did not exist at the time of the commencement of the action. *Trust Co.*v. *Telegraph Co.,*47 Hun, 315; 14 N. Y. State Rep., 269. Neither by amendment of the original complaint, nor by supplemental complaint, can facts which occurred after suit brought be made a part of plaintifE’s case, so as to turn what is no cause of action at all into a good cause of action. *McCullough*v. *Colby,*4 Bosw., 603; *Muller*v. *Earle,*37 N. Y. Super. Ct., 388. The cause of action now sought to be maintained, by means of a change of the original complaint, only arose when the dividends were declared, and such declaration occurred long after the commencement of the action. The fact that the declaration, at the time it was made, is alleged to have been made *nunc pro tune*as of the years 1877 to 1882, can make no difEerenca The reason already given being decisive, it is unnecessary to discuss any other question.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., concurs.
No. 53114.

#### Barton & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 110199-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
Travelzoo.com Sales
800 W. El Camino Real, Ste. 180
Mountain View, CA 9404
Tel: 650.323.7000
Fax 650-323.7014




October 10, 1998



Travelzoo.com Corporation
Rovert House, Market Street, North
PO Box N-259
Nassau
Bahamas


Dear Sirs,

This is to confirm our agreement that  Travelzoo.com  Corporation will outsource
the  classifieds  publishing  business  for  the  Travelzoo.com  website  to our
company.  We will manage the technical platform and manage and handle marketing,
customer support, and billing.

Our company  acts  independently  and conducts the business in such manner as it
regards appropriate.

Our company will pay Travelzoo.com Corporation quarterly the net income from the
classifieds publishing business, after deducting a 5% commission.

This contract can be terminated by each party with a 90 days notice.

Sincerely,


/s/  Ralph Bartel
----------------------------------------
Ralph Bartel
President
FAA 333 exemption

I am writing this petition in order to operate our commercial drone for our construction company. W e build projects all over the world that we enjoy getting aerial footage of to share with our clients and building owners. The benefit of seeking this exemption would be geared towards the owners or new buildings as well as their potential clients. Saving time and money during the project for our owners, as well as keeping everyone safe while on the project. W ith a drone, we are able to v iew different aspects and angles of a job that we would normally not be able to see. We take safety at our company at the highest regards. W e will be using the drone to also oversee safety on each job site, to make sure every procedure is followed. We understand the rules of flying and take those into full regards when operating the unmanned aircraft.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q
filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lisa F. Campbell                             
|                      |  |     |  | Lisa F. Campbell                                 
|                      |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 99-50669

____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HUGH VON MESHACK; LAWAYNE THOMAS; LINDA PARKER; TERRANCE IAN HODGES, also known as Guda;

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas, Waco

March 7, 2001

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion, August 28, 2000, 5 Cir. 2000, ___F.3d___)

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED in part: We STRIKE

footnote 20 in our previous opinion and replace it with the following:

On remand, the d ist rict court must resentence Meshack pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §-2-

841(b)(1)(C). Due to his prior convict io ns, Meshack may be resentenced to a maximum of 30 years.

We also STRIKE the following text in Section III: “ See United States v. Rios-Quintero

, 204

F.3d 214, 215 (5th Cir. 2000) (reviewing for plain error even though the case the defendants relied

upon was not decided at the time of trial).” We substitute in its place: “ S ee United States v. Johnson

,

520 U.S. 461, 467, 117 S.Ct. 1544, 1549, 137 L.Ed.2d 718 (1997) (reviewing for plain error even

though the case on which the defendants relied had not been decided at the time of trial).”

Finally, we STRIKE the t ext in Sect ion III A beginning with “We decline to exercise our

discretion in this manner here because Hodges can show no meaningful benefit

. . .” and ending with

“Thus, we find there was no plain error in Hodges’s sentence for marijuana possession.” In its place

we insert the following:

We decline to exercise our discretion in t his manner here because Hodges can show no meaning ful benefit he would receive from vacating this sentence. 1 9 Cf

. United States v. Williams

, 183 F.3d 458, 464 (5th Cir. 1999) (“[L]eaving Williamso n incarcerated for 30 years when he should have been sentenced to no more than 15 under existing precedent, especially

when we gave the benefit of the legal rule to others appealing their convictions during that time, seriously would affect the fairness, integrity and public reputati on of judicial proceedings by undermining the rule of law”). He will not serve less time as a result of resentencing on

this count. Moreover, he has not asserted that our decision not to correct the sentence will have collateral consequences. Thus, we find there was no plain error in Hodges’s sentence for marijuana possession.

______________________

19 Hodges c annot show that correcting the error would invalidate one of the convictions against him, as the conceded error does not call Hodges’s conviction into question.

In all other respects, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

_________________________________ EMILIO M. GARZA

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc., v. United States

No. 6335.

Entry No. 13682, etc.

Pro forma invoice dated February 19, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 21, 1942, etc.

(Decided August 26, 1946)

*Tompkins & Tompkins {J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard F. Weeks,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise consisting of earthenware and the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues decided in *United States*v. *William S. Pitcairn Corp.,*Suit No. 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appraised value of the merchandise consisting of earthenware involved in each of the cases enumerated in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
From: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE) To: Adams, Lucy H. Subject: FW: Hydralock Chrome Test Report Date: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 8:37:50 AM Attachments: Hydralock Chrome Tank Stack Test.pdf 

# And another.

Teresa Seidel Air Quality Division Acting Field Operations Supervisor
Lansing 517-373-7037 Warren - 586-753-3730 Detroit - 313-456-4680
"Solution is possible where acceptance is ready."

- Pearl S Buck

From: Reed, Krista (DNRE) Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 8:36 AM To: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE) Subject: Hydralock Chrome Test Report
Attached is the stack test report for Hyrdralock’s chrome tank.

Krista Reed Environmental Quality Analyst Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment Air Quality Division Southeast Michigan District (586)753-3764

From: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE) Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:24 AM To: DEQ-AQD-Field Cc: Fiedler, Lynn (DNRE); Fiedler, David (DNRE) Subject:



### RTI on behalf of EPA is looking for actual stack test data from sources subject the NESHAP for Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks, Subpart N. We cannot query MACES for this information (It's on the list to be fixed). If you are aware of a facility who has conducted this test please let me know ASAP and then send a copy of the report to me in the Lansing office. Thanks Everyone,

Teresa Teresa SeidelAir Quality Division Acting Field Operations Supervisor
Lansing 517-373-7037 Warren - 586-753-3730 Detroit - 313-456-4680
"Solution is possible where acceptance is ready."

- Pearl S Buck
#### The Hub—Henry C. Lytton & Sons et al. *v.*United States

No. 6654.

Entry No. 650, etc.

Invoices dated Hawick, Scotland, July 10, 1941, etc.

Certified July 12, 1941, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., August 18, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 20, 1946)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d; of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-445-018]


Alliance Pipeline, L.P.; Notice of Negotiated Rate

March 22, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 16, 2007, Alliance Pipeline L.P. 
(Alliance) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 11, proposed to be effective 
April 1, 2007.
    Alliance states that copies of the filing have been served on 
Alliance's customers, state commissions and other interested persons.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5f3f0e7f6fadbd9dcdbd0e6c0c5c5dac7c1f5d3d0c7d69bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f494a5d4c40616366616a5c7a7f7f607d7b4f696a7d6c21686079">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5701 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 4.7.1

SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL AGREEMENT(S)  TO EXHIBIT 4.7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Facility Lease Agreement (T2), dated as of August 17, 2000, by and between
Powerton Trust II, as Owner Lessor, and Midwest Generation, LLC, as Facility
Lessee.




                                        1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8817 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8817

   To improve data collection and reporting for youth in residential 
                          treatment programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2024

Mr. Steube (for himself and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To improve data collection and reporting for youth in residential 
                          treatment programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Accountability, Reporting, 
Information Sharing, and Health Act''.

SEC. 2. GUIDANCE TO STATE ON IMPROVING DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING 
              FOR YOUTH IN RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PROGRAMS.

    Within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the 
Department of Education, Administration for Children and Families, the 
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Department of Justice, 
and other relevant policy experts, as determined by the Secretary, 
shall issue and disseminate, or update and revise, as applicable, 
guidance to State agencies in administering the State plans approved 
under parts B and E of title IV of the Social Security Act on the 
following:
            (1) Best practices for Federal agencies and State agencies 
        in carrying out such a State plan to collect data and share 
        information related to the well-being of youth residing in 
        residential treatment facilities, including youth so residing 
        out-of-State.
            (2) Best practices on improving State collection of data 
        related to incidents of maltreatment in youth residing in 
        residential treatment facilities.
            (3) Best practices on improving oversight of youth 
        residential programs receiving Federal funding, and research-
        based strategies for risk assessment related to the health, 
        safety, and well-being of youth residing in residential 
        treatment facilities.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as the Principal Executive Officer of China ShouGuan Mining Corporation****(the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:  April 14, 2016

/s/ Feize Zhang

  

Feize Zhang

Chairman and Principal Executive Officer

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(a)


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports (1)
dated February 15, 2001 with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements
and schedules of PFL Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated February 2, 2001 with
respect to the subaccounts of PFL Life Variable Annuity Account C, which are
available for investment by contract owners of the Extra Variable Annuity,
included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Registration Statement (Form
N-4 No. 333-83957) and related Prospectus of the Transamerica Extra Variable
Annuity, formerly known as the Extra Variable Annuity.


                                                  Ernst & Young LLP


Des Moines, Iowa
April 24, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, R. Byron Carlock, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, certifies that
(1) this Quarterly Report of CNL Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and its results of operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.



|                        |  |  |  |                           |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ R. Byron Carlock, Jr.
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | Name:                     |  | R. Byron Carlock, Jr.                
|                        |  |  |  | Title:                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer