alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The Seasons of children's lives should be safe, winter should be secure and warm

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The Seasons of children's lives should be safe, winter should be secure and warm 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Defense 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  128 × 22 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  026326390.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
### Public Hearing for the 

### GRIC Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Air 

### Quality Tribal ImplementationPlan
I Date: 

# 5~ 23 , 

## 0 Time: 

# '&

# Lt- %(CQ 

# cQ&p+ Location: 

## _r) 

# i* CHECK-IN AND 

### SIGN-IN All attendees pleaseJiI1 in the information below.
NAME: 

# M.'cl\d

# 8. Ks~ 

# .

# - AFFILIATION: 

# L a+ J 

### I vbv ADDRESS: 

## p.~, db9 2~210 E-MAIL: ,,-cl,~k~ 

### lQ b.e~. COC, 

# ol JQS OILC..A\L 731~b PHONE: 

### 60 30x 

# - LX QQ FAX: &1) 749 

# - 7 

### /SJ- - - * AFFILIATION: 

### bb%Zs? 

# %&%w E-MAIL: 

# mm @ &WW. PHONE: 

## fGO2-\%--544% FAX: \b02\ 

# -+m - Slyq L NAME: A I AFFILIATION: 

# QU, 

# /, c ADDRESS:_G)-L, p 

## &1 -L E-MAIL: 

# mCI,, ,

L, C, 

# %,a, r t 

# -" 

# a n. PHONE: 1- I k 

### 4lgSddy FAX: AFFII,IATIoN: 

## ~tn 

# vlec + 

# #rod\! E-MAIL: 

## ufi~ @! 4

# wm('(9 h PHONE: 

### @OZ 

### -ZZY '

# - 5n

# + FAX: NAME: {%,-\ AFFILIATION: 

## -*+- ADDRESS:-&- L~ E-MAIL: 2 N Y-+?-\. 

# &- PHONE:&>

# a~ - 

# ,- 

# - .5,2vfi FAX:
NAME: 

## mde5 

# &firer\ AFFILIATION: ADDRESS: 

## q0 

# u, J~DD desf E-MAIL: Nor& 

### L1.rCkla %Yo54 PHONE: FAX:AFFII JATION: C 

### 5'P'Ewccjc~t E-MAIL: 

## ,dwh- 

# - J')ZK/CIS PHONE: * 

### 6 stc (43 7- 

### 733-3 FAX: 

### 6sr -- 

### 937-2 2&, 

# NAME:^ AFFILIATION: 

### Uf 

# wA &? ADDRESS: 

### 3~ N. C~WA~~ ~bd 

# - E-MAIL: L, wi-4 

### e 

# +B

### 7~~5-lc)A=* 

### 833~s"- PHONE: A32 1622 

# q33-z FAX: 

## 520 7-93 2373 NAME: 

### GlI- fi- AFFILIATION: 

### us ADDRESS: 

### ~addpclzo~Yc E-MAIL: AC/<& -. 

# w p~a.sehl PHONE: 

## SU 49 $3 o(t8 FAX: 

# . 4953 f333 NAME: &W;M &&Qr AFFILIATION: ADDRESS: 

## d?sa t 

### Lf@fJ; P 

### ~II-g E-MAIL: ~OCPA~~X. 

## A% PHONE: 

# rn FAX: NAME: 

### '~~E:R&L/ CL Cr 

## f AFFILIATION: 

### kc^ 

## S&-A ZmC

-~ 

# . , -- . ADDRESS: /oJr/s5', ky/&y@ E-MAIL: 

### TCWC Oh 

### fd~Jd 

# 6- *CCIZY 

## c&d/4~ .AZ 

### a~* PHONE: 

### pa ,q96- 7633 

## LcP FAX: ~j&?d- 496. ?'/ 3-
NAME: 

# ~~~~ AFFILIATION: 

# &;\Lf2j\l~ %A-Q- 

# f h~ ADDRESS: 

## 4.0. 

## %s 9- E-MAIL: 

# - %W7 PHONE: (~b) q(F

### - 21 bb 3 FAX: ~EJ-) 

# . Lt(

## k- 311b
NAME: AFFILIATION: ADDRESS: E-MAIL: 

### M 

## b PHONE: FAX: NAME: AFFILIATION: 

# 6 ADDRESS: E-MAIL: 

### ~IC~I S~ 

## rotnlc.

## row 

# b PHONE: 

### 520 

### 7qb-(oa~5

d 

### "0 FAX: 

### 6-rn 

## 7qb 

## 14

# NAME:F;RE?D RI 

## hlG~ AFFILIATION: ADDRESS: E-MAIL: PHONE: FAX:
NAME: AFFILIATION: ADDRESS: E-MAIL: PHONE: FAX:
AFFILIATION: E-MAIL: PHONE: FAX: 

### \ 

# c 6~&ce\ NAME: 

# >m~~o L

. 

# mott,41 

## - AFFILIATION: 

# G, \& 

# &\I is Ka(~-a 

### cboqba E-MAIL:\ePrL4Lgtko/\.

## b7 

# a ,ccR"r PHONE:~$O~
,

## $[>a. -7 

### o 9 FAX: 

## dl&
I NAME: 

## E2q awn 

## 'RQ~ AFFILIATION: 

## c ~0 

### ,

### wden LUOL.U~/ ADDRESS: 

## 2ib S, 

## ROO~EVELT*.%W E-MAIL: 

### 6Ky- recd@<qn'c .n&n.uS' TZpe, A?, PHONE: 

### dm-6~-%00
I FAX: NAME: AFFILIATION: ADDRESS: E-MAIL: PHONE: FAX: NAME: AFFILIATION: ADDRESS: E-MAIL: PHONE: FAX:
NAME: AFFILIATION: ADDRESS: E-MAIL: PHONE: FAX:
#### Jones, McDuffee & Stratton Corp. *v.*United States

No. 6347.

Entry No. 1294/1-2-3-4-6, etc.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, June 4, 1941, etc.

Certified June 5, 1941, etc.

Entered at Boston, Mass., August 22, 1941, etc.

(Decided September 10, 1946)

*Benjamin A. Levett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as”that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WILLIAM B. MATLOCK, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

19 USCMA 282, 41 CMR 282

*283No. 22,581

March 6, 1970

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Captain Paul C. Saunders,*and *Captain Monte Engler*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel David T. Bryant, Major Edwin*P. *Wasinger, Captain William R. Steinmetz,*and *Captain John C. Lenahan*were on the pleadings for Ap-pellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

DaRden, Judge:

Tried and convicted by a general court-martial at Fort Gordon, Georgia, of desertion, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 865, the appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, confinement at hard labor for three years (reduced to two years by the convening authority), and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. We granted the appellant’s petition for review to consider the consequences of the law officer’s failure to orally instruct the court-martial on sentence voting procedures.

Here, as in United States v Pryor, 19 USCMA 279, 41 CMR 279 (1970), instructions on sentencing matters failed to include oral advice on the processes of deliberation and voting as provided in the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, paragraph 765(2). See also United States v Johnson, 18 USCMA 436, 40 CMR 148 (1969). Such advice was included, however, as a part of the voting instruction sheet introduced, after first being shown to opposing counsel,' as Appellate Exhibit 7.

In the absence of some indication that the court considered the contents of this exhibit, wé believe the disposition in this instance is controlled by United States v Pryor, supra, not by United States v Caid, 13 USCMA 348, 32 CMR 348 (1962). Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing on the sentence may be ordered.

Judge FERGUSON concurs.

Quinn, Chief Judge

(dissenting):

For the reasons set out in my dissent in United States v Pryor, 19 USCMA 279, 41 CMR 279 (1970), I would affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.
Order entered October 12, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00389
- CV
JOHN HURT AND LESLEA HURT , Appellant s

V. AMALENDU GOSWAMI AND HARSHA GOSWAMI , Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 003
- 02059
- 2020

O RDER On October 7, 2022, on a ppellants’ motion to order the county court to file communications between appellant and the county court ’s staff or cl erk in a supplemental record , we provided that appellants could file copies of those communications with the trial court clerk for inclusion in a supplemental record

. B y motion filed October 10, 2022 , appellants ask we reconsider and order the county cour t to file the communications. We DENY the motion.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 10.0 

**AMENDED AGREEMENT**

THIS AMENDEDAGREEMENT (“Amended Agreement”) is made this 30th day of June, 2008 and hereby amends in its entirety the terms of that certain Agreement(“Original Agreement”) dated September 14, 2006 between Gust Kepler (“KEPLER”) and G2 Ventures, Inc. (“G2”): 

WHEREAS, on September 14, 2006, KEPLER and G2 entered into the Original Agreement documenting loans made by KEPLER to G2 from 2004 through June 2006 and reciting terms to repay a portion of those loans; and 

WHEREAS, subsequent to the Original Agreement, KEPLER and G2 had a verbal agreement amending the terms under which KEPLER would be repaid a portion ofthose loans; and 

WHEREAS, KEPLER and G2 desire to document the intent of their current understanding regarding loans made to G2 by KEPLERand the repayment of a portion of the same; 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Loans Made by KEPLER: The parties hereto acknowledge that KEPLER has made loans to G2 totaling $138,838 as of the date of thisAmended Agreement. 

2. Acknowledgment of Offering and Repayment Terms: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree to the termsoutlined in the Prospectus for an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) with an effective date with the Securities and Exchange Commission of May 13, 2008 including the terms outlining the repayment of a portion of the KEPLER loans asfollows: 

“If we raise the maximum of $150,000, we will pay $15,000 to Gust Kepler, our sole officer, director, and employee, asrepayment of a portion of the money that Mr. Kepler lent to us (including loans from Mr. Kepler to G2 Companies, Inc. assumed by us).” 

3. Terms for Repayment of Balance of Loans: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that any portion of the loans made by KEPLER to G2 that are not repaid from proceeds derived from the IPO, will be repaid asfunds become available from revenues. 

4. Miscellaneous: 

(a) Modification. Neither this Amended Agreement nor any provisions hereof shall be modified, discharged or terminated except by an instrument inwriting signed by the party against whom any waiver, change, discharge or termination is sought. 

(b) Binding Effect. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Amended Agreement shall be bindingupon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, legal representatives and assigns. 

(c)Entire Agreement. This instrument contains the entire agreement of the parties, and there are no representations, covenants or other agreements except as stated or referred to herein. 

(d) Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed and construed under the laws of the State of Texas. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amended Agreement to be executed and delivered on the date first above written. 

 
G2 VENTURES, INC.By: 
/s/ Gust Kepler
 Gust Kepler, President
 

/s/ Gust Kepler
Gust Kepler, an individual
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9021 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the deduction for 

advertising and promotional expenses for prescription drugs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2024 

Ms. SLOTKIN (for herself, Ms. CRAIG, and Mr. TRONE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the 

deduction for advertising and promotional expenses for 

prescription drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Tax Breaks for 

5 Drug Ads Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9021 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR ADVERTISING 

2 AND PROMOTIONAL EXPENSES FOR PRE3 SCRIPTION DRUGS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part IX of subchapter B of chap5 ter 1 of subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 280I. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR DIRECT8 TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING OF PRESCRIP9 TION DRUGS. 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No deduction shall be allowed 

11 under this chapter for expenses relating to direct-to-con12 sumer advertising of prescription drugs for any taxable 

13 year. 

14 ‘‘(b) DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING.—For 

15 purposes of this section, the term ‘direct-to-consumer ad16 vertising’ means any dissemination, by or on behalf of a 

17 sponsor of a prescription drug product (as such term is 

18 defined in section 735(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 

19 Cosmetic Act), of an advertisement which— 

20 ‘‘(1) is in regard to such prescription drug 

21 product, and 

22 ‘‘(2) primarily targeted to the general public, 

23 including through— 

24 ‘‘(A) publication in journals, magazines, 

25 other periodicals, and newspapers, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 9021 IH

1 ‘‘(B) broadcasting through media such as 

2 radio, television, and telephone communication 

3 systems, direct mail, and billboards, and 

4 ‘‘(C) dissemination on the Internet or 

5 through digital platforms (including social 

6 media, mobile media, web applications, digital 

7 applications, mobile applications, and electronic 

8 applications).’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec10 tions for such part IX of the Internal Revenue Code of 

11 1986 is amended by adding after the item relating to sec12 tion 280H the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 280I. Disallowance of deduction for direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs.’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act, in taxable years 

16 ending after such date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Nathaniel F. Bradley IVNathaniel F. Bradley IVChairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
May 3, 2007/s/ Mark A. RedmanMark A. Redman
Senior Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
May 3, 2007 34
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF ALPHA NETWORK ALLIANCE VENTURES
INC.



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form
10-K of Alpha Network Alliance Ventures Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2016, the undersigned, Eleazar Rivera, President of
Alpha Network Alliance Ventures Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2016 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Alpha Network Alliance Ventures Inc.



|Date:  October
    20, 2017 | /s/ Eleazar Rivera                                                                                                                        
|--------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                            | Eleazar Rivera                                                                                                                            
|                            | President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (and principalexecutive officer, principal financial officer and principalaccounting officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021 (the "Report") of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the "Registrant"), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert A. Hamwee, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ ROBERT A. HAMWEEName:Robert A. HamweeDate:February 28, 2022
Before the Second Division,

March 19, 1951

No. 55369.

#### Royal Hickman Industries *v.*United States,

petition 6641-R (Memphis).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial counsel for petitioner requested permission of the court to submit the petition “without prejudice so that the petitioner might refile this petition for remission after final judgment or adjudication by the Court in compliance with Rule Twenty-five of the rules of the Customs Court.” The petition was therefore dismissed without prejudice to the right of the importer to file another petition “at any time after final appraisement, but within 60 days after liquidation,” as provided in rule 25, Rules of the United States Customs Court.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00250

- CV
Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool v. City of Hidalgo
On Appeal from the 464th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 3507

- 21

- L

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT O F APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decis ion certified below for observance. August 25, 2022
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7503
JOHN HENRY STRATTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, BUCKINGHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1306-R) Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Henry Stratton, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:John Stratton seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stratton v. Warden, Buckingham Corr. Ctr. , No. CA-95-1306-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 19, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2007211EN.01005802.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/58

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 July 2007 — Continolo v Commission

(Case F-143/06) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of pension rights - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2007/C 211/108)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Donato Continolo (Duino-Aurisina, Italy) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, C. Bernard-Glanz, and R. Albelice, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and M. Velardo, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Staff case — Annulment of the decision of the Commission on the award and calculation of the applicant's pension rights, to the extent that it does not completely credit the period from 11 June 1981 to 1 March 1983 which he spent on leave on personal grounds

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | The parties are to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties are to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007, p. 41.

1

---