alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2704

___________ Glenn R. Waite, M.D., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Judge Richard D. Sievers; Judge D. * Nick Caporale; Lanet S. Asmussen, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 5, 1997 Filed: December 23, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, BEAM, an d MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
GlennR. Waite, brought an action seeking damages under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) against two N ebraska judges and a Nebraska court clerk. Waite claimed the defenda nts individually, and in conspiracy, denied him access to the courts an d equal protection by refusing to file his pleading seeking to reopen an appeal in which the mandate had issued nearly three years earlier, and by concealing the judicia l determination that such post-mandate p leadings would not be filed. Waite also soughtThe Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United States Distric t 1 Court for the District of Nebraska. -2- declaratory re lief. The district court granted summary judgment to defendants based 1 on absolute judicial and quasi-judicial immunity, and denied declaratory relief. Waite appeals.
We conclude summary judgment was proper. The evidence showed th e defendant judges acted within their judicial capacity and jurisdictionregarding the postmandate document and notification to Waite of the procedure being followed. Se e Mi reles v. Waco , 502 U.S. 9, 11-12 (1991) (per curiam) (discussing parameters o f ju dicial immunity). The evidence also established the defendant clerk acted at th e judges & direction. See Rogers v. Bruntrager , 841 F.2d 853, 856 (8th Cir. 1988) (clerks absol utely immune from actions for damages arising from acts that “they ar e specifically required to do under court order or at judge & s direction”) . Furthermore, any co nspiracy claim against defendants cannot overcome the bar of absolute immunity

. See Moses v. Parwatikar , 813 F.2d 891, 892-93 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 484 U.S. 832 (198 7). We agree Waite was not entitled to declaratory relief with respect to th e procedure the judges followed in his case. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

CITY OF SEATTLE,

Petitioner/Cross-Respondent,

v.

STEVEN GREGORY LONG,

Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

No. 78230-4-I

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION, WITHDRAWING

OPINION, AND SUBSTITUTING

OPINION

Respondent/Cross-Petitioner Steven Long filed a motion for 

reconsideration of the opinion filed on May 4, 2020. Petitioner/Cross-Respondent 

City of Seattle filed a response. The court has determined that the motion should 

be denied. However, the opinion should be withdrawn, and a substitute opinion 

filed. Now, therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the opinion filed on May 4, 2020, is withdrawn; and it is 

further

ORDERED that a substitute opinion shall be filed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.7


                             CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION
                            NEVADA-LODE MINING CLAIM

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that DESERT PACIFIC EXPLORATION INC.,
Incorporate in Nevada, whose address is 12475 Overbrook Drive, Reno, Nevada
89511, has located and claimed the Panorama #6 Lode Mining Claim in the
following quarter sections(s):

NE   1/4,    Section           Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB7M
NW   1/4,    Section           Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M
SE   1/4,    Section    11     Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M
SW   1/4,    Section           Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M

In Mineral County, Nevada, on the 30th day of October, 1996.

SAID CLAIM IS A LODE CLAIM, it being situated in the above mentioned County and
State, and is approximately 1500 feet long and 600 feet wide, such that 1475
feet is claimed in an South direction and 25 feet in a North direction from the
point of discovery (monument of location), at which the Notice of Location was
posted, together with 300 feet on each side of the monument of location and
center line of the Claim. The general course of the lode or vein is from the
South to the North.

THE NUMBER, LOCATION, AND MARKINGS On each monument are as follows:

         Location          Markings                Description
         --------          --------                -----------

No. 1 Northeast corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 2 Southeast corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 3 Southwest corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 4 Northwest corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post

A CLAIM MAP as required by NRS 517.040 is included as part of the work of
location.

Dated:  January 11, 1997

               RECEIVED                    DESERT PACIFIC EXPLORATION INC.
        Bur. Of Land Management
          9:00 A.M.  JAN 24 97             BY: /s/ Herb Duerr
           NEVADA STATE OFFICE                 Herb Duerr, President
              RENO, NEVADA
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD07-7-000]


Conference on Competition in Wholesale Power Markets; Notice of 
Conference

March 23, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 8, 2007, a second conference will be held 
at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) to 
examine the state of competition in wholesale power markets. This 
second conference will be held from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. (EST) at the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's offices, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in the Commission Meeting Room. All interested 
persons are invited to attend. A further notice with a detailed agenda 
will be issued in advance of the conference.
    Transcripts of the conference will be immediately available from 
Ace Reporting Company (202-347-3700 or 1-800-336-6646) for a fee. They 
will be available for the public on the Commission's eLibrary system 
seven calendar days after FERC receives the transcript.
    A free webcast of this event will be available through 
www.ferc.gov. Anyone with Internet access who desires to view this 
event can do so by navigating to www.ferc.gov's Calendar of Events and 
locating this event in the Calendar. The event will contain a link to 
its webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical support for the 
free webcasts. It also offers access to this event via television in 
the DC area and via phone bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, 
visit http://www.CapitolConnection.org or contact Danelle Perkowski or 
David Reininger at 703-993-3100.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4a5a7a7a1b7b7ada6ada8adb0bd84a2a1b6a7eaa3abb2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95f4f6f6f0e6e6fcf7fcf9fce1ecd5f3f0e7f6bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    For more information about this conference, please contact: Clara 
Brooks, Office of Energy Markets and Reliability, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, 
(202) 502-8357, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90d3fcf1e2f1bed2e2fffffbe3d0f6f5e2f3bef7ffe6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="acefc0cddecd82eedec3c3c7dfeccac9decf82cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5755 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 99.10**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Principal Accounting Fees and Services” and to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of our report dated March 30, 2016, with respect to the statement of financial position of Sprott Physical Silver Trust as at December 31, 2015, and the statements of comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 30, 2016 in the Registration Statement (Form F-10 No. 333-212156).

 

 
|                | /s/“*Ernst & Young   LLP”* |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Toronto, Canada     | Chartered Professional Accountants            |
| March 23, 2017 | Licensed Public Accountants                   |

 

----
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of World
Moto, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

| | Date: April 15, 2015                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                          
| | By:  /s/ Paul Giles                                      
| | Name: Paul Giles                                         
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal
      Executive
| | Officer)                                                 

---
No. 41884.

#### Protest 142186-G of Salem Shawiry (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The claim at 75 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1430, Tariff Act of 1922, was sustained.
(V. D. 13)

#### American Thermo-Ware Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 713539, etc.

(Decided September 16, 1954)

*Walter Auster*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *American Thermo-Ware Company*v. *United, States,*32 Cust. Ct. 526, Abstract 58170. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the'agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof.

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

> *499Schedule “A”

> *Remand of protest No. Entry No. Merchandise United States dollars per each*

> 223920-K/11484-53 713539 1 lot containing 75 pairs 7 x 50 binoculars with, cases

> Binoculars, each_ 12. 50

> Carrying cases, each_ 2. 00

> 1 lot containing 50 pairs 8 x 30 binoculars with cases

> Binoculars, each_ 11. 75

> Carrying cases, each_ 1. 25

> 1 lot containing 25 pairs 8 x 30 binoculars with eases

> Binoculars, each_ 10. 25

> Carrying cases, each_ 1. 25

> 779043 1 lot containing 100 pairs 7 x 50 binoculars with cases

> Binoculars, each_ 10. 60

> Carrying cases, each_ 2. 00

> 771801 1 lot containing 125 pairs 7 x 35 binoculars with cases

> Binoculars, each_ 14. 60

> Carrying case's, each_ 1. 30

> 1 lot containing 50 pairs 7 x 35 binoculars with cases

> Binoculars, each_ 17. 20

> Carrying cases, each_ 1. 30

> 789841 1 lot containing 25 pairs 10 x 50 binoculars with cases

> Binoculars, each_ 14. 80

> Carrying cases, each_ 2. 00

> 1 lot containing 100 pairs 7 x 18 binoculars with cases

> Binoculars, each_ 6.90

> Carrying cases, each_ 0.60

> 765775 1 lot containing 50 pairs 7 x 50 binoculars with cases

> Binoculars, each_ 14. 50

> Carrying cases, each_ 2. 00

> 1 lot containing 150 pairs 7 x 50 binoculars with cases

> Binoculars, each_ 12. 50

> Carrying cases, each___ 2. 00

> net packed
Exhibit 99.13


Purchase Agreement





(Unofficial English Translation)





Contract No. C-YM20110103


Place of execution: Pindingshan


Date of execution: January 3, 2011





Seller: Shaanxi Xiansheng Industry and Commerce Co., Ltd.


Buyer: Baofeng Coking Factory of Henan Province Pingdingshan Coal and Coke Co., Ltd.





I. Purchase Order


Amount of Purchase (metric tons)Name of Receiver

Departure

Station

Arrival

Station

Goods

Specification

Yearly

Total

Purchase


First

Quarter


Second

Quarter


Third

Quarter


Fourth

QuarterBaofeng Coking Factory of Henan Province Pingdingshan Coal and Coke Co., Ltd.

Jiayu Guan

West Pingdingshan

Raw Coal

Water ≤ 8%

Volatility ≤ 35%

Ash ≤ 25%

Sulfur ≤ 0.5%

G Value ≥ 80


50,000



-



-



-



-





II. The price of the goods shall be RMB 800 per metric ton, subject to further negotiation between the parties according to the market price at the time of delivery.





III. A difference of 0.8 metric tons per truckload from the order amount shall be allowed without requiring additional payment or refund. Any difference of more than 0.8 metric tons per truckload from the order amount shall be resolved by additional payment or refund based on the actual amount delivered.





IV. Seller shall not deliver the goods until Buyer completes a sample inspection and gives permission to Seller to deliver.





V. Buyer shall pay for the goods when the goods are loaded and ready for delivery.





VI. Any unsettled matter under this Agreement shall be resolved through consultation between the parties. This Agreement is effective through December 31, 2011.





Seller: Shaanxi Xiansheng Industry and Commerce Co., Ltd. [corporate seal]


Buyer: Baofeng Coking Factory of Henan Province Pingdingshan Coal and Coke Co., Ltd. [corporate seal]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

h1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

144741 & (30)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144741

COA: 301685

Oakland CC: 2008-220445-FC

PATRICK CARL JONES,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

peremptory reversal is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 10.41


 


LEASE AMENDMENT NO. 9


 


This Lease Amendment made and entered into
this 15th day of December, 2014, by and between Whitesell Enterprises, hereinafter referred to as (“Landlord”)
and American Bio Medica Corporation, hereinafter referred to as (“Tenant”);


 


WHEREAS, Landlord leased to Tenant that certain
premises known as Units 3, 4 and 6 at 603 Heron Drive, Logan Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey, consisting
of 14,406 square feet, (the “Premises”) pursuant to a Multi-Tenant Industrial Lease dated
July 7, 1999; subsequently amended by Lease Amendment No. 1 dated August 17, 1999, Lease Amendment No. 2 dated May 23, 2001, Lease
Amendment No. 3 dated August 20, 2002, Lease Amendment No. 4 dated October 9, 2006, Lease Amendment No. 5 dated January 19, 2007,
Lease Amendment No. 6 dated December 1, 2011, Lease Amendment No. 7 dated December 12, 2012 and Lease Amendment No. 8 dated December
4, 2013, (the “Lease”) the terms and conditions being more particularly described therein; and


 


WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant wish to amend
the Lease;


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum
of One Dollar ($1.00), the promises and undertakings contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant intending to be legally bound, hereby agree to amend the Lease
as follows:


 


		1)	On December 31, 2014, Tenant shall return and surrender Units 3 and 6 at 603 Heron Drive to Landlord
consisting of 9,168 square feet in the condition required by the Lease.
	 	 	 



	 	2)	For the Lease Term, as renewed by this Lease Amendment, the Premises shall be Unit 4 only, consisting
of 5,238 square feet.
	 	 	 



		3)	The term of the Lease shall be renewed for a period of one (1) year commencing January 1, 2015
and expiring December 31, 2015.
	 	 	 



		4)	Base Rent for the renewed Lease Term shall be $6.50 per square foot net, $34,047.00/year, $2,837.25/month.
	 	 	 



		5)	Tenant’s pro rata share shall be decreased to 12.11%.



 


Except as modified by this Lease Amendment,
all other terms and conditions of the original Lease shall remain in full force and effect.


 


	LANDLORD: WHITESELL ENTERPRISES
	By: Whitesell Construction Co., Inc., Authorized Agent
	 	 
	By	/S/ Thomas J. Heitzman
	 	Thomas J. Heitzman, Manager
	 
	TENANT:  AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORPORATION
	 	 
	By	/S/ Melissa A. Waterhouse
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 25, 2016

No. 04-16-00226-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Lauro Eduardo RUIZ,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR4068

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The State’s Motion for Extension of Time to file their Brief is GRANTED. The State’s

Brief is due on June 14, 2016.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of May, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)
 
 I, Steven C. McNeal, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
 
 In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee.
 
 
 Dated: March 27, 2020
 
 By:  /s/ Steven C. McNeal
 Name:  Steven C. McNeal
 Title:  Vice President and Treasurer
 of Entergy Arkansas, LLC, as Servicer
 (Senior officer in charge of the
 servicing function)
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**





I,
      Steven
      H. Kane, Chief Executive Officer of Protalex, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby
      certify pursuant to Rule 13a-l4(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as
      amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
      that:





(1)
      the
      Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2006 (the
      "Report"), to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Dated:
                  July 28, 2006
                By:
                /s/
                  Steven H. KaneSteven H. Kane
                  Chief
                    Executive
                    Officer
Rule 1915.4-1. Alternative Hearing Procedures for Partial Custody Actions.

* * *

(c) The president judge or the administrative judge of the family division of 

each county shall certify that custody proceedings generally are conducted in 

accordance with either Rule 1915.4-2 or Rule 1915.4-3. The certification shall be filed 

with the Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee of the Supreme Court of 

Pennsylvania and shall be substantially in the following form: 

I hereby certify that ___________________ County conducts its custody proceedings in 

accordance with Rule ____________________.

________________________________________________________

(President Judge) (Administrative Judge)

Note: Pursuant to Rule 1915.4-1, the following counties have certified to the 

Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee that their custody proceedings 

generally are conducted in accordance with the rule specified below: 

COUNTY RULE 

* * *

Northumberland [1915.4-3] 1915.4-2

* * *