alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John J. White, App’lt, *v.*Horace K. Thurber, Resp’t.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed February 10, 1890.)*

Lease—Covenant bob quiet enjoyment.

A covenant for quiet enjoyment in a lease is not broken by the landlord entering to make needful repairs. The refusal of the tenant to permit the repairs to be made does not affect the legal right of the landlord to make repairs rendered necessary by the insecure condition of the premises.

Appeal from judgment dismissing the complaint

Action for breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment in a lease. In 1886, defendant leased to plaintiff certain premises in Brooklyn for five years and four months, with a privilege of renewal, plaintiffs covenanting to keep the building in repair. In May, 1886, the adjoining building, a corner one, was taken down by order of the department of buildings, when it was found that the party wall bulged and overhung and was in a dangerous condition. The department then condemned the wall and ordered the defendant to remove it. Defendant thereupon entered into a contract with one McMurray to take down the wall and erect a new one, which was accordingly done. Plaintiff remained in the premises during the time the work was going on, and brings this action to recover $6,500 for injury to his business, stock, etc., and *205because the new wall, being wider than the old, contracts the space he originally had.

*James & Thomas H.*Troy, for app’lt; *H. Arlington,*for resp’t.

Pratt, J.

The covenant of quiet enjoyment was not broken by the landlord entering upon the premises to make needful repairs. That covenant is directed to an eviction by title superior to that of the landlord, and is not violated by an unlawful trespass.

But in this case the entry was not unlawful. It was m obedience to a high duty owed to society, viz.: to keep the building in repair that it would not injure people by its fall:

The refusal of the tenant to permit the repairs to be made does not affect the legal right

It was proven without dispute that the landlord acted upon the requirement and notice of the department of buildings, and the evidence is to the effect that due care was taken to avoid interfering with the business of the tenant Such injury as was caused to plaintiff’s business was rendered necessary by the insecure condition of the premises, and cannot be recovered for by action.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

YOUSSOUF OUSMANE 

ABDOURAHMANE,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:11-CR-156

Judge Peter C. Economus

ORDER 

Defendant, by consent, appeared before Magistrate Judge Kemp pursuant to Rule 11, 

F.R.Cr.P. and entered a plea of guilty to Count One (1) of the Superseding Indictment. 

Magistrate Judge Kemp filed a Report and Recommendation concerning this plea and made the 

following findings: (1) Defendant was competent and capable of entering an informed plea; (2) 

the plea was knowingly and voluntarily made; (3) the offenses charged were supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense; (4) Defendant 

entered a valid Alford plea. The government filed an objection to the Report and 

Recommendation on the subject of the Alford plea on the basis that the Department of Justice did 

not agree to entry of that plea. No other objections were filed.

After consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the government’s objection, the 

Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. # 59) that the 

plea agreement and Defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts Defendant’s plea of 

guilty to Count One of the Superseding Indictment, on which Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Peter C. Economus______________

PETER C. ECONOMUS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:11-cr-00156-PCE-NMK Doc #: 62 Filed: 05/15/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Before the Second Division,

May 20, 1958

No. 61960.

#### Lucas Electrical Service and James G. Wiley *v.*United States,

protest 273625-K (Los Angeles).

*560Opinion by

Rao, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ammeters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lucas Electrical Services, Inc.,*and *Frank J. Eberle Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 1776); that certain ammeters in entry 11922 were parts of automobiles and others were parts of motorcycles; and that part 36110, on invoice sheet 1, entry 19888, was a part of a tractor. As the instant protest was filed more than 60 days after the liquidation of entry 19888, it was held untimely and was dismissed as to said entry. The items stipulated to be parts, of automobiles in entry 11922 were held dutiable at 12percent under paragraph 369 (c), as modified, *supra,*and those stipulated to be the parts of motorcycles were held dutiable at 15 percent under said paragraph, as modified, *supra,*as claimed.
Searched for **http://www.ssa.gov/international/Agreement_Pamphlets/chile.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.ssa.gov/international/Agreement_Pamphlets/chile.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
```

[House Report 108-73]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

108th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     108-73

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO THE 
  SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 
                               COMMITTEE

                                _______
                                

   April 10, 2003.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 192]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 192, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any special rule reported on the legislative day of Friday, 
April 11, 2003, providing for consideration or disposition of a 
conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1559) making 
emergency wartime supplemental appropriations for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2003, and for other purposes.

                                

```
Order entered November 1 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00703

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant

V.

ASHLEY BETH GAMILL, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. MA13

- 49137



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS court reporter Trashuna Salaam to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of

the date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 1, a DVD.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by elec tronic transmission, to

Trashuna Salaam, official court reporter, County Criminal Court No. 7, and to counsel for all

parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
#### C. A. Haynes & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7514.

Entry Nos. 742142; 744926.

Invoices dated Sherborne, Dorset, England, January 23, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 1, 1946, etc.

(Decided January 20, 1948)

*Benjamin*A. *Levett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Audit and Financial Management Advisory (AFMAC) Committee 
Meeeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Appendix 2 of title 
5, United States Code, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that 
the U.S. Small Business Administration, Audit and Financial Management 
Advisory Committee (AFMAC) will host a federal public meeting on 
Wednesday, April 18, 2007 at 9 a.m. EST. The meeting will take place at 
the U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Investment 
Division Conference Room, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.
    The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the SBA's FY 2006 Audit 
Remediation, FY 2007 Financial Reporting, FY 2007 Credit Subsidy 
Modeling, A-123 Internal Control Program, Information System Security, 
Performance Management Framework, FY 2007 PAR Content and Production, 
and the FY 2007 Audit.
    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Jennifer Main in writing or 
by fax. Jennifer Main, Chief Financial Officer, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
6th Floor, Washington, DC 20416, phone: (202) 205-6449, fax: (202) 205-
6969, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ce84aba0a0a7a8abbce0a3afa7a08ebdacafe0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="08426d6666616e6d7a2665696166487b6a69266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>.

Matthew Teague,
Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-6245 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Wm. P. Pickett, Assignee, etc., Resp’t, *v.*Ada F. M. Gollner, App’lt.

No papers.

Motion to dismiss granted, with costs, and ten dollars costs of motion.

See 26 N. Y. State Rep., 691.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-172-001]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

March 29, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 23, 2007, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet No. 148, 
bearing a proposed effective date of March 17, 2007.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Sec.  154.210 of the 
Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest must 
serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#377172657478595b5e595264424747584543775152455419505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="470102150408292b2e292214323737283533072122352469202831">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-6209 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 12.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MakeMyTrip Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15(d)-15(f)) for the company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
Audit Committee of the companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Rajesh MagowName:
    Rajesh MagowTitle:
    Group Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:11-cr-60

Manfredo Gudiel-Ramos 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 18) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: April 21, 2011 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cr-00060-JLG Doc #: 20 Filed: 04/21/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8867 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8867

 To amend the REAL ID Act of 2005 to allow States to determine whether 
 to require licenses and other identification to list a gender or sex, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2024

 Ms. Norton (for herself and Mr. Frost) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the REAL ID Act of 2005 to allow States to determine whether 
 to require licenses and other identification to list a gender or sex, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``REAL ID Gender Requirement Reform 
Act''.

SEC. 2. IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 202(b) of the REAL ID Act of 2005 (49 
U.S.C. 30301 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (3);
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (9) as 
        paragraphs (3) through (8), respectively; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) State Determination of Listing Gender.--A State may determine 
whether to include a gender or sex field required for a driver's 
license and identification card issued to a person by the State. If a 
State includes any such gender or sex identification, a person shall 
indicate the appropriate designation without any additional 
documentation requirement (such as a doctor's note) and the State shall 
include an unspecified or other designation in the gender or sex field 
in addition to male or female.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--Section 508(a)(1) of the 
Court Security Improvement Act of 2007 (49 U.S.C. 30301 note) is 
amended by striking ``section 202(b)(6)'' and inserting ``section 
202(b)(5)''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of BioVeris Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Samuel
J. Wohlstadter, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: August 17, 2004
    
    /s/ Samuel J. WohlstadterSamuel J. WohlstadterChairman and Chief Executive Officer
 A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8681 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8681

    To ensure that hospitals are considered an eligible entity when 
awarding health profession opportunity grants under section 2008 of the 
                          Social Security Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2024

 Mr. Horsford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To ensure that hospitals are considered an eligible entity when 
awarding health profession opportunity grants under section 2008 of the 
                          Social Security Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Providers Training Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF HOSPITALS FOR HEALTH PROFESSION OPPORTUNITY 
              GRANTS.

    Section 2008(a)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1397g(a)(4)(A)) is amended by striking ``or a community-based 
organization'' and inserting ``, a community-based organization, or a 
hospital (as defined in section 1861(e))''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect on October 1, 
2024.
                                 <all>
```
No. 53115.

#### Galsworthy, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 110768-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
<PAGE>


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Amendment to the Registration Statement on Form N-4
(the "Registration Statement") of (1) our reports dated February 5, 2001
relating to the financial statements of Separate Account Nos. 3, 4, 10, 51 and
66 of The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, and (2) our
report dated February 5, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements
of The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States. We also consent to
the use in the Prospectus Supplement constituting part of this Registration
Statement of our report dated February 5, 2001 relating to the financial
statements of Separate Account No. 4 of The Equitable Life Assurance Society of
the United States. We also consent to the references to us under the headings
"Condensed Financial Information" and "About our independent accountants" in
such Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
April 25, 2001