alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ G. Randall AllisonG. Randall AllisonVice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### James F. Fox, *Receiver, etc., Respondent, v.*Horace L. Hodge, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered *before*another referee, costs *to*abide event, unless the respondent shall stipulate to reduce the judgment as indicated in the opinion, in which case the judgment as so reduced is affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Smith, P. J.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of BRISSET BEER INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin Malone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:











|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                          
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

















A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











|Date: July 20, 2022 |  | */s/ Kevin Malone*                                    | 
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|                    |  | Kevin Malone                                          | 
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
EXHIBIT 32.4



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UCDP FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 3, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Short, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 15, 2005



By:

/s/ MICHAEL J. SHORTMichael J. Short Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)




29
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8655 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8655

To require the Federal Air Marshal Service to develop a plan to enhance 
    the Federal law enforcement presence at airports, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2024

  Mr. Gimenez (for himself and Mr. Thanedar) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Air Marshal Service to develop a plan to enhance 
    the Federal law enforcement presence at airports, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Air Marshal Enhancing 
Airport Security Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PLAN TO ASSIGN FEDERAL AIR MARSHALS TO DUTIES BEYOND THE 
              AIRCRAFT AND THROUGHOUT THE AIRPORT ENVIRONMENT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Transportation Security 
Administration shall direct the Director of the Federal Air Marshal 
Service (FAMS) to develop a plan and brief the Committee on Homeland 
Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation of the Senate addressing roles, beyond 
inflight security, of Federal Air Marshals at certain airports. Such 
plan will address Federal Air Marshals' Federal law enforcement role to 
ensure airport aviation security at such airports.
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``law enforcement 
personnel'' has the meaning given such term in section 44903 of title 
49, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 10182)

#### Gitkin Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 827355-1/3, etc.

(Decided February 27, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn for*the plaintiff.

*William S.*Officii, *Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule for decision upon stipulation reading as follows:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “A” and initialed HHG (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner H. H. Geller (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof.

> 2. That as so limited, the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *Gitkin Co.,*A.R.D. 132, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 3. On or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, at prices equal to the appraised unit values less the proportionate part of the items described on the invoices under the heading “Actual Charges”, said prices including the cost of all containers and coverings and all other costs incidental to shipment to the United States, and that on or about the said dates of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers for home consumption in the country of exportation.

*574On the agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as it existed prior to the amendment thereof by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, or as defined in section 402a(d) of the said act, as so amended (according to the date of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, of the involved merchandise for consumption), to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the items described above and that such values are the appraised unit values, less the proportionate part of the items described on the invoices under the heading “Actual Charges.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.
# C_2007140EN.01001101.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht des Saarlandes (Germany) lodged on 30 March 2007 — Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes, Marion Schneider, Michael Holzapfel, Dr Fritz Trennheuser and Deutscher Apothekerverband e.V. v Saarland and Ministerium für Justiz, Gesundheit und Soziales, intervening party: DocMorris N.V.

(Case C-171/07)

(2007/C 140/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht des Saarlandes

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimants: Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes, Marion Schneider, Michael Holzapfel, Dr Fritz Trennheuser and Deutscher Apothekerverband e.V.

Claimants:

Defendants: Saarland and Ministerium für Justiz, Gesundheit und Soziales

Defendants:

Joined party: DocMorris N.V.

Joined party

Questions referred

| 1. | Are the provisions concerning freedom of establishment for capital companies (Articles 43 and 48 EC) to be interpreted as precluding a prohibition on foreign ownership of pharmacies, as provided for by Paragraph 2(1)(1) to (4) and (7), the first sentence of Paragraph 7 and the first sentence of Paragraph 8 of the Gesetz über das Apothekenwesen — ApoG — (Law on Pharmacies) of 15 October 1980 (BGBl. I, p. 1993), as amended most recently by Article 34 of the Regulations of 31 October 2006 (BGBl. I, p. 2407)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are the provisions concerning freedom of establishment for capital companies (Articles 43 and 48 EC) to be interpreted as precluding a prohibition on foreign ownership of pharmacies, as provided for by Paragraph 2(1)(1) to (4) and (7), the first sentence of Paragraph 7 and the first sentence of Paragraph 8 of the Gesetz über das Apothekenwesen — ApoG — (Law on Pharmacies) of 15 October 1980 (BGBl. I, p. 1993), as amended most recently by Article 34 of the Regulations of 31 October 2006 (BGBl. I, p. 2407)?

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the affirmative:
  Having regard in particular to Article 10 EC and to the principle of effectiveness of Community law, is a national authority entitled and obliged to disapply national provisions it regards as contrary to Community law even if there is no clear breach of Community law and it has not been established by the Court of Justice of the European Communities that the relevant provisions are incompatible with Community law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the affirmative:

Having regard in particular to Article 10 EC and to the principle of effectiveness of Community law, is a national authority entitled and obliged to disapply national provisions it regards as contrary to Community law even if there is no clear breach of Community law and it has not been established by the Court of Justice of the European Communities that the relevant provisions are incompatible with Community law?

---
No. 45093.

#### Protests 905358-G, etc., of Hong Kee Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(C. D. 372) crude drugs were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 and drugs, sliced, at 10 percent ad valorem under paragraph 34 as claimed.
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(a)

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports (1)
dated February 2, 2001 with respect to the financial statements of the
subaccounts of PFL Life Variable Annuity Account A, which are available for
investment by the contract owners of The Atlas Portfolio Builder Variable
Annuity, and (2) dated February 15, 2001 with respect to the statutory-basis
financial statements and schedules of PFL Life Insurance Company, included in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-
26209) and related Prospectus of The Atlas Portfolio Builder Variable Annuity.


                                               Ernst & Young LLP


Des Moines, Iowa
April 24, 2001
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION www.edgaradvantage.com




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.3    
  


      Agreement  


    This agreement was entered into effective December 1, 2000 between Wayne A. Case and Schmitt Industries, Inc. 



    As
Wayne Case was issued 293,250 common stock shares of Schmitt Industries Common Stock on December 16, 1998 by way of an exercise of an existing Non-qualified
Stock Option and, 


    Wayne
A. Case provided to Schmitt Industries, Inc. at that time a note for $586,500 due December 16, 2000 and, 


    The
note received from Wayne A. Case was secured by the shares issued as a result of the exercise of the Non-qualified Stock Options and, 


    Schmitt
Industries, Inc. holds the certificate evidencing those shares until the note agreement is paid in full. 



    Now
the parties wish to terminate the transaction, Case wishes to return the shares to Schmitt and Schmitt will cancel and return the note to Case upon receipt of the Shares. 


    The
Company will cancel the shares and it is agreed the option rights of Case have lapsed. 



	



	
 	

	
 	

 	
 	


	 	 	Wayne A. Case	 	 	 	Robert C. Thompson, CFO/Treasurer

Schmitt Industries, Inc.











QuickLinks


Exhibit 10.3
EXHIBIT 35.1














SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION (“THE SERVICER”)








I, Wei Shi, certify that:





(a)   A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable Sale and Servicing Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2012 has been made under my supervision.




(b)   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








March 21, 2013








By:  /S/ WEI SHI





Wei Shi


Vice President - Treasury, Finance & Analytics


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of the


Toyota Auto Receivables 2010-B Owner Trust
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Nord Anglia Education, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Fitzmaurice, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  November 29, 2016

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Andrew Fitzmaurice |                    |
|--------|------------------------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:                  | Andrew Fitzmaurice      |   |
|   | Title:                 | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Attachment 1

Jackson Power Facility Water Flow Diagram
1 The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2692

___________ William G. Carter, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Alan Blake, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 22, 2007 Filed: May 23, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. William G. Carter appeals the district court’s 1 order granting defendant’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Carter’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Carter’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Atkinson v. Bohn , 91 F.3d 1127, 1128-29 (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16873-16874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of the 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of 
the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) is soliciting public comments, ideas, and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 1, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227, or 
206-220-6096.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of the 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, May 1, 2007 from 9 a.m. 
to 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time via a telephone conference call. If you 
would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-
888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Dave Coffman, TAP Office, 915 
2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. Due to limited conference lines, notification of 
intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be 
made

[[Page 16874]]

with Dave Coffman. Mr. Coffman can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-
220-6096.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 29, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-6289 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8909 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8909

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 82-6110 Mamalahoa Highway in Captain Cook, Hawaii, as the ``Army 1st 
           Lt. John Kuulei Kauhaihao Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARMY 1ST LT. JOHN KUULEI KAUHAIHAO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 82-6110 Mamalahoa Highway in Captain Cook, Hawaii, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Army 1st Lt. John Kuulei Kauhaihao Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Army 1st 
Lt. John Kuulei Kauhaihao Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32_2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Merrill B. Blanksteen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer hereby certify that NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.s report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|/s/ Merrill B. Blanksteen                                      
|                                                               
|Merrill B. Blanksteen                                          
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



Date: May 11, 2004



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.