alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 8875)

Entry No. 830739, etc.

#### Carbons, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 25, 1957)

*Fred Bennett', Jordan & Klingaman,*associate counsel; for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court,

> 1- That all the merchandise on the entries the subject of the above-entitled reappraisement appeals consists of arc light carbons imported from France.

> 2- That the issues in the aforesaid appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *Bert Friedberg & Company*v. *United States,*R. D. 8590, and that the record in the said R. D. 8590 may be incorporated in the record in each of the aforesaid appeals.

> 3- That the appraised value of the merchandise in each of the aforesaid appeals, less 19.50 per cent, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that, on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise herein involved, merchandise such as or similar thereto was not sold or offered for sale in the country of exportation for export to the United States.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the reappraisement appeals herein may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

*546On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value in each instance was the appraised value, less 19.50 per centum.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 77742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31908]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70

[EPA-R07-OAR-2011-0822; FRL-9505-7]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of 
Missouri

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
and Operating Permits Program revisions submitted by the state of 
Missouri which align the state's rule entitled ``Submission of Emission 
Data, Emission Fees and Process Information'' with the Federal Air 
Emissions Reporting Requirements Rule (AERR).

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by 
January 13, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2011-0822, by mail to Amy Bhesania, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, 
Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Bhesania at (913) 551-7147, or by 
email at bhesania.amy@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of the Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final 
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse 
comments to this action. A detailed rationale for the approval is set 
forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are 
received in response to this action, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this 
action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives 
adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed 
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of 
the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional 
information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules 
section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: November 28, 2011.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2011-31908 Filed 12-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit 13.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
MOKO Social Media Limited (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2014
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                 | MOKO SOCIAL MEDIA LIMITED
|---------------- | -------------------------
|                 |                          
|October 31, 2014 | By:                      
|                 | Name:                    
|                 | Title:                   
|                 |                          
|                 |                          
|October 31, 2014 | By:                      
|                 | Name:                    
|                 | Title:                   
|                 |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

ALLANDO GROSE,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRETT MILLER,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:11-cv-191

Judge Peter C. Economus

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the February 24, 2012 Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. 17.) The Magistrate Judge recommended, in 

light of a previous show cause order, that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for 

failure to prosecute. 

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties 

that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a 

“waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the 

judgment of the District Court.” (Report & Recommendation 2, Dkt. 17.) The time period for 

filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. No party has objected to the 

Report and Recommendation. 

It appears from the record that the Court may not possess Plaintiff’s current address. (See 

Dkt. 18.) It is Plaintiff’s responsibility, however, to keep the Court apprised of his current 

address. See Tew v. F.B.I., No. 1:11–cv–554, 2011 WL 4025645, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 12, 

2011) (“By failing to keep the Court informed of his current address, Plaintiff demonstrates a 

lack of prosecution of his action.”).

Case: 2:11-cv-00191-PCE-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/20/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 

Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have 

been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the 

Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s action is 

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is DIRECTED to 

remove this action from the Court’s pending case list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/s/ Peter C. Economus - March 20, 2012

Case: 2:11-cv-00191-PCE-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/20/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
### Prepared for: Federal Aviation Administration Docket Management Facility US Department of Transportation Prepared by: Jerry Bruce /Caesars Entertainment Services PO Box 60332, Boulder City, NV. 89006 March 11, 2015

Contents Petition for Exemption Letter FAA UAS Civil COA Request Location of proposed operation with VFR Chart FAA N number Registration N6789X Proof of Ownership

Petition for Exemption under section 333 of the FAA reform Act and Part 11 of A

viation Regulations.I, Jerry Bruce, an employee of Caesars Entertainment Services and holder of a Commercial Pilot Certificate hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulation (FARs) to allow me to operate a small unmanned UAS (unmanned aerial system)
The area of designated flight is the Cascata Golf Course located in Boulder City NV. The golf course is considered private property but is open to the public. Location is approximately 1.5 miles north west of the city.
Our intention is to film the golf course for advertisement purposes and put the video on our company website. The flights will be initiated from all 18 tee boxes and flown to all respective greens detailing yardages, hazards and obstacles. Altitude will be from the surface to 100ft. Utilizing the UAV as opposed to a manned helicopter will greatly improve safety and costs due to the shear size and capability of the UAV which weighs approximately 4 pounds. A helicopters weight and rotor wash at low altitude will adversely effect video quality.

The UAV in use will be a Turbo Ace Matrix with GPS, NAZA VM2 flight control system a three axis gimball with a GoPro 3+ camera mounted on the nose and a Futaba 14sg Long Range radio transmitter coupled with a R7008SB 2 way receiver and telemetry voltage sensor. The system includes a “fail safe” and “Go Home” feature in the event of loss of signal. It is powered by 1, 8000mah Lithium-Polymer (LiPo) battery along with 1, 2200mah Lithium-Polymer battery for the camera gimbal.It is constructed of a carbon fiber body and square aluminum tubular arms with four TA-Mat 13 balanced brushless motors. Flight time is approximately 26 minutes. The UAV weighs approximately 4 pounds.
All flights will be performed during DAYLIGHT operation only. There will be NO players or spectators at the time of flights for SAFETY concerns. The only buildings on the property are the golf pro shop and restaurant (one building) there are no homes or other structures on the
course.
Obtaining an exemption for this project will mean potential increase in our business allowing our current and future guests to view the course before and or after they play it.

Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated.!
Sincerely

Jerry Bruce PO Box 60332 Boulder City , NV. 89006 < jbruce081@gmail.com > 702-499-3904
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1574

ANGELA ANGEL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00348-GLR)

Submitted: September 20, 2018 Decided: October 2, 2018

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angela Angel, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joel Branman, Tax Division, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Angela Angel appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion for leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis in her civil action and denying her motion for reconsideration. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See Angel v. IRS, No. 1:18-cv-00348-GLR (D. Md. 

Apr. 27, 2018; Mar. 30, 2018). We grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 907 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 907

  To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the definition of 
                 franchise fee, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

   Ms. Eshoo (for herself, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Raskin, Ms. Bonamici, Ms. 
Norton, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Panetta, Ms. Slotkin, Mr. Auchincloss, Ms. Lee 
of California, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Trone, Ms. McCollum, and Mr. McGovern) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to modify the definition of 
                 franchise fee, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Community Television 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF FRANCHISE FEE.

    Section 622(g)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
542(g)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``includes'' and inserting ``means''; and
            (2) by inserting ``other monetary'' before ``assessment''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2014 (the Report) of Direxion Shares ETF Trust II
(the Registrant) and each of its Funds, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick J. Rudnick, the Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                     |  |  |  |        |  |                                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 27, 2015 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Patrick J. Rudnick                                  
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Patrick J. Rudnick                                      
|                     |  |  |  | Title: |  | Principal Financial Officer Direxion Shares ETF
Trust II
EXHIBIT 32.2
     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Government Properties Trust, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nancy D. Olson, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.     Date: May 5, 2005 /s/ Nancy D. Olson        Nancy D. Olson   Chief Financial Officer and   Treasurer  
23
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Ableauctions.com, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Abdul Ladha, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated April 6, 2006



/s/ Abdul Ladha

Abdul Ladha

Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### James W. Craig and Ashberry Albritton v. D. B. Wilder, as Administrator of the Estate of W. E. Wilder, Deceased.

176 So. 148.

Division A.

Opinion Filed September 22, 1937.

*Treadivell & Treadwell*and *R. R. Brown,*for Appellants;

*Leitner & Leitner,*for Appellee.

*328Per Curiam.

Bill of complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of DeSoto County, Florida, to procure a decree declaring certain deeds appearing on their face to convey fee simple title to have the force and effect of mortgages only, and for an accounting, and to decree the terms of redemption from the liens created by such deeds when considered as mortgages.

Motion was made to dismiss the bill of complaint upon four grounds, as follows:

“1. Said bill, is without equity.

*“2.*Said bill is vague, indefinite and so uncertain in its allegations that it is impossible for the said defendants to plead thereto.

“3. Because the said bill indicates, by reference thereto, that the deceased W. E. Wilder, whose estate is represented by the complainant, was guilty of such laches as affords a complete bar to the prosecution of said action.

“4. That the bill of complaint does not set forth facts which would entitle the complainant to the relief sought or in fact to any relief.”

Motion was denied and from the order denying the motion appeal was taken.

The bill of complaint is not without equity and, therefore, the order should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

. Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Before the Third Division,

October 10, 1945

No. 50563.

#### Protests 27542-K, etc., of Y. Akiyama et al. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nippon Co.*(32 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 303), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith certain items of the merchandise were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1705 as kelp, and other items were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1540 as seaweeds, manufactured.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The Seasons of children's lives should be safe; the leaves change, the love should stay the same

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The Seasons of children's lives should be safe; the leaves change, the love should stay the same 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Defense 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  139 × 26 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  026326284.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8963 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

521 Thorn Street in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Mary Elizabeth 

‘Bettie’ Cole Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2024 

Mr. DELUZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 521 Thorn Street in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘Mary Elizabeth ‘Bettie’ Cole Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MARY ELIZABETH ‘‘BETTIE’’ COLE POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 521 Thorn Street in Sewickley, 

7 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Mary Elizabeth ‘Bettie’ Cole Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8963 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mary Elizabeth 

5 ‘Bettie’ Cole Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Frederick Boomis, *as Trustee, v.*Silence J. White and others.

Motion to modify judgment of last term denied, without costs.