alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01
                              CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Pacult, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
White Oak Financial Services, Inc., the general partner of Providence Select
Fund, Limited Partnership (the "Fund" or the "Registrant"), does hereby
certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

  (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

  (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

  (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

  (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



By: /s/  Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult



Date: August 14, 2006
From: Szabo, Aaron [mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 4:09 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Owens, Nicole; Ling, Michael

Cc: Laity, Jim

Subject: Conclusion of EO 12866 and 13563 Review: Data Requirements Rule for the One-Hour Sulfur 

Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) (RIN No. 2060-AR19)

This email serves as notice that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has concluded its review 

under Executive Orders (EO) 12866 and 13563 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) final 

rule titled Data Requirements Rule for the One-Hour Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS) (RIN No. 2060-AR19).

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you.

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202-395-3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of American Realty Funds Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joel Wilson, Co-Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.

To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                          |                               
|------------------------- | ------------------------------
|Dated: September 28, 2011 | /s/ Joel Wilson               
|                          | Joel Wilson                   
|                          |                               
|                          | Co-Principal Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Mark S. Robinow, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kona Grill, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablelikely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Mark S. Robinow   Mark S. Robinow
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                                U.S. VISION, INC.
                                STOCK OPTION PLAN


      U.S. Vision, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), adopted a Stock
Option Plan dated as of February 29, 1996 (the "Plan"), providing for shares of
the Company's common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the "Common Stock"), to
be issued under the Plan pursuant to the terms and conditions stated in the
Plan. Subject to stockholder approval, at a meeting held on April 19, 2000, the
Board of Directors of the Company adopted resolutions amending the Plan to
increase the aggregate number of shares subject to issuance under the Plan from
1,300,000 to 2,000,000. Also, at the Annual Meeting of stockholders of the
Company held on June 22, 2000, the stockholders of the Company approved the
amendment to the Plan.

      As a result of the approval by the Company's Board of Directors and the
stockholders, the Plan is hereby amended to increase the total number of shares
subject to issuance under the Plan from 1,300,000 to 2,000,000.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, acting by and through its officers
hereunto duly authorized, has executed this instrument as of the 22nd day of
June, 2000.



                                    U.S. VISION, INC.


                                    By:/s/
                                       ------------------------------------
                                    Kathy G. Cullen, Senior Vice
                                    President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(b)
                                ---------------


                        OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY
<PAGE>

          [Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company Letterhead]

April 10, 2001


Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa  52499-0001

Re:  Separate Account VA-2L
     Registration on Form N-4  SEC File No. 33-49998

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage
Variable Annuity policies are those deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)   the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the Policies,

(2)   the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the
      policies,

(3)   the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and management
      of the policies and/or riders to the policy and that provides for a
      reasonable margin of profit.

Fees and charges assessed against the policy values in the variable account
include:

(i)   Service Charge and Administrative Charge

(ii)  Surrender Charge

(iii) Mortality and Expense Risk Fee (M&E)

(iv)  Taxes (including premium and other taxes if applicable)

(v)   Any applicable rider fees or charges

The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through (v)
is established in the pricing of the Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage
Variable Annuity, to achieve a reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is
within the range of industry practice with respect to comparable variable
annuity products.
<PAGE>

Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company
April 10, 2001
Page 2


Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred. Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges. In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
Policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the Policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the Registration Statement.



/s/ Calvin R. Birkey
--------------------------------------
Calvin R. Birkey, FSA, MAAA
Managing Actuary
Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8789 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8789

   To require benefit eligibility determinations to be made within a 
                        certain period of time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2024

Mr. Weber of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require benefit eligibility determinations to be made within a 
                        certain period of time.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Officer John Barnes Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION.

    Section 1205 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10285) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(f) Not later than 270 calendar days after receiving a claim 
filed under this subpart, the Bureau shall inform the claimant of the 
Bureau's determination as to the claimant's benefit eligibility.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Face Print Global Solutions, Inc. a Wyoming corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Pierre Cote, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Pierre Cote

Pierre Cote

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Date: February 20, 2006
No. 54116.

#### The May Company *v.*United States,

protest 69277-K (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (4)(d)

                          FORM OF POLICY ENDORSEMENT
                             (PREMIUM ENHANCEMENT)

<PAGE>

                  [LETTERHEAD OF PFL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY]

                            AMENDATORY ENDORSEMENT


The Policy to which this Amendatory Endorsement is attached, Section 3, Premium
Payments, is amended to include the addition of the following language:

     PREMIUM ENHANCEMENT

     When a Premium Payment is paid, a Premium Enhancement Percentage will be
     applied to that Premium Payment and the resulting amount will be added to
     the Policy Value. The amount of the Premium Enhancement is not considered a
     Premium Payment. The Premium Enhancement Percentage may vary from premium
     to premium on subsequent Premium Payments but will never be less than 1%
     nor more than 3%. The Premium Enhancement Percentage applicable to the
     Initial Premium Payment is set forth on the Policy Data Page. We will
     advise You of the amount of the Premium Enhancement applicable to each
     subsequent Premium Payment in a confirmation that We will send to You.
     Premium Enhancements will be applied using the same allocation as on the
     corresponding Premium Payment. No Premium Enhancement will apply if the
     Policy is cancelled pursuant to the Right to Cancel provision.

This endorsement takes effect and expires concurrently with the Policy to which
it is attached and is subject to all the terms and conditions of the Policy not
inconsistent herewith.

                       Signed for us at our home office:


               /s/ Craig D. Vermie           /s/ William L. Busler
                    SECRETARY                      PRESIDENT
Rev 0 (9/08) 

## Comments in Response to “Final rule; request for comments”

Docket: FAA-2011-0547 Direct orate Identifier 2011-NE-13-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “ Final rule; request for comments,”

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above.

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the AD directorate focal.

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from:

Three domestic operators and two CAA Engineers (Australia, Japan) requested that we include additional engine models in section (c)Applicability of AD 2011-15-10. Specifically, to add: Teledyne Continental Motors models TSIO-520-WB, TSIO-360-RB and LTSIO-360-RB; Superior Air Parts Engines IO-360-C3A1; a nd Lycoming models TIO-541-E1A4, -E1B4, -E1C4 and -E1D4. The FAA concurs and will supercede AD 2011-15-10 with a new AD that adds all known affected engine models.

(Please check one)

These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or change of this AD.

These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of

additional regulatory action. 

### (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

______Neil Duggan, ACE-118A _____ 11/15/2011

__ Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

524 

KA 11-01285 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL CURETON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (SHERRY A. CHASE OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID PANEPINTO OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P. Franczyk,

J.), rendered May 23, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, after a

nonjury verdict, of unlawful imprisonment in the second degree and

criminal contempt in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a

nonjury trial of, inter alia, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree

(Penal Law § 135.05), defendant contends that the verdict with respect to

that crime is against the weight of the evidence. Although we agree with

defendant that “an acquittal would not have been unreasonable,” we

conclude that, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime

in this nonjury trial, “[b]ased on the weight of the credible evidence .

. . [County Court] was justified in finding the defendant guilty beyond a

reasonable doubt” (People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348). The court was

entitled to resolve credibility issues against defendant (see People v

Cuthrell, 13 AD3d 1224, 1225, lv denied 4 NY3d 885), and to reject his

version of the events (see People v McCoy, 100 AD3d 1422, 1422). “[U]pon

our review of the record, we cannot say that the court failed to give the

evidence the weight that it should be accorded” (People v Britt, 298 AD2d

984, 984, lv denied 99 NY2d 556). Finally, defendant’s challenge to the

legality of the sentence of probation imposed on the unlawful

imprisonment count has been rendered moot as a result of the revocation

of his sentence of probation (see generally People v Meli, 142 AD2d 938,

939, lv denied 72 NY2d 921). 

Entered: April 26, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quanta Capital Holdings Ltd. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Peter D. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

|          |                                                                                                                       |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|          |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Date: May 9, 2007

/s/ Peter D. Johnson                                                    Peter D. Johnson(Principal Executive Officer)

This certification is not deemed to be ‘‘filed’’ for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

----
#### James Smith, alias “Deep Sand,” v. State.

176 So. 756.

Division B.

Opinion Filed November 4, 1937.

*Frank Redd,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Tyrus A. Nor-wood,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

*816Chapman, J.

The parties in this opinion will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court as State and defendant.

An information was filed in the Circuit Court of Sarasota County, Florida, on May 2, 1936, charging the defendant with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor, and upon arraignment entered a plea of not guilty. He was placed upon trial.and was by a jury found guilty and was by the lower court sentenced to serve a period of twelve months in the common jail of Sarasota County, Florida. The record fails to show the filing of a motion for a new trial and an order of the court thereon.

Defendant was adjudged insolvent, a' supersedeas order and bond were entered and given and the cause is here by review on writ of error. We have examined the record with the assignments of error before us, as well as brief of counsel for defendant, and no error having been made to appear the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown, J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and ‘Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.