alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007179EN.01000101.xml

| 1.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 July 2007

(2007/C 179/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3707 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4409 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,674 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,19 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6519 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,64 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9595 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,037 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6967 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,789 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,159 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,365 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7498 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5951 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,454 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7258 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,775 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0712 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 260,08 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,74 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3795 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3085 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 644,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7351 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,093 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,006 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,121 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3707

JPY

Japanese yen

163,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4409

GBP

Pound sterling

0,674

SEK

Swedish krona

9,19

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6519

ISK

Iceland króna

83,64

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9595

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

28,037

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6967

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,789

RON

Romanian leu

3,159

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,365

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7498

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5951

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,454

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7258

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,775

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0712

KRW

South Korean won

1 260,08

ZAR

South African rand

9,74

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3795

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3085

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 644,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7351

PHP

Philippine peso

62,093

RUB

Russian rouble

35,006

THB

Thai baht

41,121

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2007183EN.01003102.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/31

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 June 2007 — Nuova Gela Sviluppo v Commission

(Case T-65/04) (1)

1

(ERDF - Conclusion of Community financial assistance - Action for annulment - Action for damages - Arbitration clause)

(2007/C 183/61)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Nuova Gela Sviluppo Soc. Cons. pa, formerly Gela Sviluppo Soc. Cons. pa (Gela, Italy) (represented by: P. Menchetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Flynn and M. Velardo, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Primarily, annulment of the decision contained in the Commission's letter of 16 December 2003 concerning the closure of assistance ERDF 98.05.26.001, annulment of the Commission decisions reducing the assistance, withdrawing the assistance and recovering the balance of the assistance, and annulment of Article 6(2) of Commission Decision SEC (1999) 1316 of 9 September 1999 on guidelines for the financial closure of operational assistance (1994-1999) from the Structural Funds, and, in the alternative, compensation for the loss suffered by the applicant and performance of the agreement of 13 September 1999 between the applicant and the Commission.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0589

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE REDMOND LOGUE JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time

to and including May 7, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s

response.

MPD

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 31 2020

03/31/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0589
#### John Consalus, App’lt, *v.*Isaac McConihe *et al.,*Resp’ts.

*É. V. Bulla/rd,*for app’lt; *Orrin Gambell,*for resp’ts.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Judge Landon, below.

All concur.

Affirming 17 N. Y. State Rep., 538.
#### C. H. Powell Co., Inc., *v.*United States

No. 7347.

Invoice dated Blackburn, England, June 17, 1946.

Certified June 20, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 22, 1946.

Entry No. 706123.

(Decided July 22, 1947)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

MollisoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Pos t Of fic e Bo x 12548 , Austin , Texa s 7 8 7 1 1 - 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3 - 2 1 0 0 • ww w.texasattor neygeneral.gov

March 13, 2015 Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle Via File & ServeXpress Clerk of the Court Third Court of Appeals 209 West 14 th Street, Room 101 Austin, Texas 78701

Re: Case No. 03

- 14 -00239- CV ; Dr. Amber Brooks, D.C. v. Texas Medical Board, et al. , Third Court of Appeals, Austin, Texas Dear Mr. Kyle: Pursuant to the Court’s request, this is to confirm my intent to argue on behalf of Appellees before this court on April 22, 2015 at 9:0 0 a.m. Please advise if we may be of further assistance in this matter. Sincerely,

/s/ Ted A. Ross Ted A. Ross Assistant Attorney General

c c: Andre D’Souza, Counsel for Appellant ( Via Facsimile E-Service ) ACCEPTED 03-14-00239-CV 4490189 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/13/2015 11:51:41 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1648. W. HENRY SCHWAB v. JENNIFER A. KIRSCH et al.

Jennifer Kirsch and The Wycliff Condominium Association, Inc. sued W.

Henry Schwab for condominium association fees and other claims. On October 14,

2014, the trial court entered final judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Schwab filed

motions for reconsideration and for a stay of the judgment, which the trial court

denied. He then filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s ruling on his two

previous motions. The trial court likewise denied that motion. On February 13,

2015, Schwab filed a notice of appeal to this Court. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of an appealable

order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). A trial court’s denial of a motion for reconsideration is

not subject to direct appeal. Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d 187)

(2000). In addition, the filing of such a motion does not extend the time for appealing

the underlying judgment – in this case, the October 14, 2014 final jugment. See id.

Schwab’s notice of appeal, therefore, isinvalid asto the order denying his motion for

reconsideration and untimely as to the October 14, 2014 final judgment.

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

May 05, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/05/2015
No. 56523.

protest 174833-K (New York).

#### Oxford University Press, New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                        |                                                                    |                                   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                        | DIAMOND                  POWERSPORTS, INC.(Registrant)                  |
|                                                   |                                                               |                              |
| Date: June                  16, 2006    | By:                                                           | /s/ Lisa                  Elliott |
|                                                        | Pierre                  ElliottChief                  Financial Officer |
Exhibit 3.1

 

**CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION**

 

**OF**

 

**AMERICAN HONDA RECEIVABLES LLC**

 

This Certificate ofFormation of American Honda Receivables LLC(the “**Company**”),dated as of March 16, 2011, is duly executed and filed to form a limited liability company in accordance with the Delaware LimitedLiability Company Act (6 Del. C. §18-201, et seq.).

 

1.                 Name. The name of the limited liability company is American Honda Receivables LLC.

 

2.                 Registered Office. The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company,1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

 

3.                 Registered Agent. The name and address of its registered agent for service of process in the State of Delaware isThe Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of American Honda Receivables LLC as of the 16th day of March, 2011.

 

**		**
# C_2007140EN.01002201.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/22

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 May 2007 — Antartica v OHIM — Nasdaq Stock Market (nasdaq)

(Case T-47/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark nasdaq - Earlier Community word mark NASDAQ - Relative ground for refusal - Reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2007/C 140/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Antartica Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: E. Racca, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (Washington DC, United States) (represented by: J. van Manen and J. Hofhuis, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of OHIM of 7 December 2005 (Case R 752/2004-2), relating to opposition proceedings between The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. and Antartica Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.3.2006.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:11-cr-128-10

Nicholas Douglas Murray 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 305) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: October 3, 2011 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cr-00128-JLG-TPK Doc #: 326 Filed: 10/03/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

 

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Sprott Asset Management LP, the “Manager” of the Sprott Physical Silver Trust (the “Trust”) is responsible for the integrity, consistency, objectivity and reliability of the Financial Statements of the Trust. International Financial Reporting Standards have been applied and management has exercised its judgment and made best estimates where appropriate.

 

The Manager’s internal controls and supporting procedures maintained provide reasonable assurance that financial records are complete and accurate. These supporting procedures include the oversight of RBC Investor Services, the Trust’s valuation agent.

 

Management has assessed the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting as at December 31, 2014 using the framework found in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this assessment, management has concluded that as at December 31, 2014 the Manager’s internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

 

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent auditors appointed by the Manager of the Trust, have audited the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2014 in addition to auditing the Trust’s Financial Statements as of the same date. Their reports, which expressed an unqualified opinion, can be found on pages 2 to 3 of the Financial Statements. Ernst & Young have full and free access to, and meet periodically with, the Manager of the Trust to discuss their audit and matters arising there from, such as, comments they may have on the fairness of financial reporting and the adequacy of internal controls.

 

Steven Rostowsky

Chief Financial Officer

March 10, 2015

 

1

----
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), theundersigned officer of Gryphon Gold Corporation, (the "Company") does herebycertify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") that: 

    1.     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

    2.     The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: February 13, 2009 

/s/ Michael Longinott                              i Michael Longinotti Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as partof the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

----
No. 57387.

protests 937002-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### China Fur Trading Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
# C_2007155EN.01002002.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/20

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 May 2007 — Merant v OHIM — Magazin Verlag (FOCUS)

(Case T-491/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark FOCUS - Earlier national figurative mark MICRO FOCUS - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/04)

(2007/C 155/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Merant GmbH (Ismaning, Germany) (represented by: A. Schulz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially, D. Schennen, subsequently, G. Schneider, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: U. Gürtler, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 October 2004 (Case R 542/2002-2) in opposition proceedings between Merant GmbH and Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 October 2004 (Case R 542/2002-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 October 2004 (Case R 542/2002-2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, Merant GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, Merant GmbH;

| 3. | Orders the intervener, Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH, to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener, Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH, to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82 of 2.4.2005.

1

---
FLINT RIVER BANCSHARES, INC.
           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1
================================================================================


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Flint River Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Gerald  E.  Lewis,  Chief  Executive  Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the  Company.


November 9, 2004

/s/  Gerald  E.  Lewis
----------------------
Gerald  E.  Lewis
Chief  Executive  Officer


<PAGE>
AGREEMENT RESPECTING
NONCOMPETITION AND NONSOLICITATION
 th
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Noncompetition
  Nonsolicitation




---



##### 



Nondisparagement
 Consideration
 Interpretation
 Severability
 Waiver of Rights
 Equitable Remedies




---



##### 



Stay of Time
 Assignability
 Amendment
 Governing Law
 Signature in Counterparts
   MARK FOSTER/s/ Mark Foster
    
    
    Date:
    May 6, 2008NEUSTAR, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey A. Babka
    
    
    Date:
    5/5/08Name: Jeffrey A. BabkaTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Registrant (Commission File Number 333-110029):

Broder Bros., Co.

Six Neshaminy Interplex, 6thFloor

Trevose, Pennsylvania 19053

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Broder Bros., Co. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin J. Matthews, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broder Bros., Co.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 8, 2008



BRODER BROS., CO.By:

/s/    MARTIN J.
MATTHEWSMartin J. Matthews Chief Financial Officer