alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 8891)

Entry No. 770032.

#### Continental Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 27, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to various items of jewelry exported from Japan and entered at the port of New York.

When the case was called for trial, it was submitted for decision by counsel for plaintiff on the official papers. An examination thereof discloses nothing to disturb the values found by the appraiser which are presumptively correct under the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2633). Accordingly, I hold the proper values for all of the items in question to be the appraised values, and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Top Gear Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the undersigned, Omri Amos Shalom, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:





1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except for the audit of our financial statements by our independent registered public accounting firm ; and


2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated: May 2, 2011





/s/ Omri Amos ShalomOmri Amos ShalomChief Executive and Financial Officer





This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of Top Gear Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 40265.

#### Protests 717301-G, etc., of J. L. Hudson Co. (Detroit).

*510Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Outerwear in chief value of wool similar to that involved in *United States*v. *International Clearing House*(24 C. C. P. A. 117, T. D. 48416) was held dutiable at 60 cents per pound and 60 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114.
No. 42976.

#### Protests 711932-G, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) rubber articles similar to those the subject of Abstract 41517 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537; (2) uninflated rubber balls at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, *United States*v. *Woolworth*(24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (3) siren whistles and horns similar to those the subject of Abstracts 39948 and 40480 at 45 percent under paragraph 397; aDd (4) novelties in chief value of rubber at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b), Abstract 25607 followed.
PCAOB Registered Auditors – www.sealebeers.com

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of Eco Science Solutions, Inc., of our report dated April 29, 2015 on our audit of the financial statements of Eco Science Solutions, Inc. as of January 31, 2015, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended Janaury 31, 2015, and the reference to us under the caption “Experts”.


























/s/Seale and Beers, CPAs





Seale and Beers, CPAs


Las Vegas, Nevada


May 17, 2016
Exhibit 32.1



         Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Barry Thomas, and CEO of Global 1 Investment Holding
Corporation., a Georgia corporation, hereby makes the following certification as
required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to
the following of this quarterly report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 30, 2007.

The undersigned certifies that the above periodic report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of Silver Screen Studios, Inc. and results of
its operations.

By:/s/ Barry Thomas
   ----------------
Barry Thomas, CEO and  Director

May 12, 2007
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8689 

AN ACT 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require Amtrak 

to include information on base pay and bonus compensation of certain Amtrak executives, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 8689 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Amtrak Executive 

3 Bonus Disclosure Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMTRAK REPORTS AND AUDITS. 

5 Section 24315(a) of title 49, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘, and make available to the 

8 public on the website of Amtrak,’’ after ‘‘submit to 

9 Congress’’; and 

10 (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(2) provide the annual base pay and any 

13 bonus compensation paid to a member of the execu14 tive leadership team (including the chief executive 

15 officer, president, and officers) of Amtrak, including 

16 the criteria and metrics used to determine any such 

17 bonus compensation; and’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8689 

AN ACT 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require 

tives, and for other purposes. bonus compensation of certain Amtrak execuAmtrak to include information on base pay and
No. 46228.

#### Protests 801645-G, etc., of J. B. Blood Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case No. 13,254.

#### SPRAGUE v. PITT et al.

[1 Kan. 610; McCahon, 212.]. 1

Circuit Court, D. Kansas.

May Term, 1868.

Sale for Taxes — Tax Deed — Limitations.

1. A tax deed duly executed by a county clerk, in pursuance of a valid sale of land for taxes by the county treasurer, witnessed and acknowledged, is prima facie evidence of title.

*9702.A tax deed so executed, witnessed, and acknowledged, and recorded, is a bar to an action for the recovery of the land, after two years from the time of recording such deed.

[This was an action of ejectment by Galatia Sprague against George L. Pitt and Peter Burr.]

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

MILLER, Circuit Justice.

As conclusions of fact. That on the 25th day of November, 1S59, Galatia Sprague, the plaintiff in this suit, located a military land warrant upon the following described tract of laud, situate in the county of Johnson and state of Kansas, namely, the northeast quarter of section twelve (12) in township (13) of range twenty-one; and that on the 1st day of October, 1860, said land was duly patented to the plaintiff in this suit, by letters patent duly issued- by the president of the United States; and that on the 15th-day of September, 1863, Jesse H. Jackson, as county clerk of the county of Johnson, in the state of Kansas, under his hand and the seal of the said county, made a tax deed, thereby conveying said laud to one E. A. Abbott, as assignee of said county, in pursuance of a sale thereof made by the treasurer of said county on the 0th day of September, I860 (at a sale began on the first Tuesday of September, 1800), to said county, for taxes for the year A. D. 1S50, and interest and costs thereon, and an assignment of the certificate of purchase to said E. A. Abbott on the 20th day of July, 1863; and that on the 22nd day of May, 1865, said E. A. Abbott conveyed all his right and title to said land to defendant George L. Htt; and that on the 15th day of September, A. D. 1863, said tax deed was recorded in the office of the register of deeds of said county of Johnson; and that-said tax deed was witnessed by two persons, and was acknowledged before a justice of the peace of said county; and that said tract of land is worth more than two thousand dollars.

And as conclusions of law from the above facts, the court decides that said treasurer had power to sell said land for taxes of 1859, on said 6th day of September, 1860; and that said county clerk had power to make said tax deed; and that said tax deed is prima facie evidence of title to said land; and that this action is barred by the statute of Kansas limiting the time in which actions may be commenced for the recovery of lands sold for taxes to two years from the time of recording the tax deed; and that plaintiff is not entitled to recover the possession of said land. It is, therefore, considered that the said defendants go hence without day, and recover of and from the said plaintiff all costs in and about this suit expended, etc.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8921 

To set aside funds for payments to Indian tribes and tribal consortia under 

subpart 1 of part B of title IV of the Social Security Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 2, 2024 

Mr. HERN (for himself and Ms. CHU) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To set aside funds for payments to Indian tribes and tribal 

consortia under subpart 1 of part B of title IV of the 

Social Security Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Child Welfare 

5 Support Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SET-ASIDE OF FUNDS FOR PAYMENTS TO INDIAN 

7 TRIBES AND TRIBAL CONSORTIA FOR CHILD 

8 WELFARE SERVICES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 428 of the Social Security 

10 Act (42 U.S.C. 628) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8921 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘may’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘shall’’; and 

4 (B) by striking the last sentence; 

5 (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(b) DIRECT PAYMENTS TO TRIBAL ORGANIZATIONS

8 AND TRIBAL CONSORTIA.—The Secretary shall pay any 

9 amount to which an Indian tribe or tribal consortium is 

10 entitled under this section directly to the tribal organiza11 tion of the Indian tribe or in the case of a payment to 

12 a tribal consortium, such tribal organizations of, or entity 

13 established by, the Indian tribes that are part of the con14 sortium as the consortium shall designate.’’; and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(d) RESERVATION OF FUNDS.—Of the amount 

17 made available under section 425 for a fiscal year, the Sec18 retary shall reserve 3 percent for payments under sub19 section (a) of this section.’’. 

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 423(a)(1) 

21 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 623(a)(1)) is amended by inserting 

22 ‘‘, after applying section 428(d),’’ before ‘‘for each fiscal 

23 year’’. 

24 (c) LIMITATION ON APPLICABILITY.—The amend25 ments made by this section shall not apply with respect 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8921 IH

1 to a fiscal year unless the amount made available under 

2 section 425 of the Social Security Act for the fiscal year 

3 meets or exceeds 103 percent of the amount made avail4 able in fiscal year 2024 to enable the Secretary of Health 

5 and Human Services to reserve 3 percent of the amount 

6 for payments to Indian tribes and tribal organizations 

7 under subpart 1 of part B of title IV of such Act without 

8 reducing the allotment of any State for the fiscal year 

9 under section 423 of such Act. Should the threshold for 

10 reserving 3 percent for payments to Indian tribes and trib11 al organizations not be met in a fiscal year, then amounts 

12 paid under section 428(a) of such Act shall be deemed 

13 to be a part of the allotment (as determined under section 

14 423 of such Act) for the State in which such Indian tribal 

15 organization is located. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MICHAEL RE, and REBECCA RE, ) INDIVIDUALLY and as NATURAL ) PARENTS and LEGAL GUARDIANS ) of K.R., a MINOR, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3496 ) AMERICAN ECONOMY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, and WOMEN'S CARE ) FLORIDA, LLC d/b/a WOMEN'S CARE ) TAMPA, ) ) Appellees. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed October 30, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Laurel M. Lee, Judge. Tracy Raffles Gunn, Lee D. Gunn IV, and Scott A. Arthur of Gunn Appellate Practice, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Jonathan R. Rosenn and Jeffrey S. Lapin of Lapin & Leichtling, LLP, Coral Gables, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.- 2 -

KELLY, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:11-cr-232

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

ADRIAN RAMIREZ-PLAZA,

Defendant.

ORDER

On October 13, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Adrian Ramirez-Plaza’s

guilty plea to Count One of the Information charging him with Distribution of Heroin in violation of

21 U.S.C. §841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(c).

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District

Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis

in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 10 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:11-cr-00232-GCS Doc #: 21 Filed: 11/03/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS 

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

Distribution of Heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:11-cr-00232-GCS Doc #: 21 Filed: 11/03/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit
31.1
  
 **DDS
Technologies USA, Inc.**
 SARBANES-OXLEY
SECTION 302(A) CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Joseph
Fasciglione, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this year-end report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2004 of DDS Technologies USA, Inc. (the “Company”);
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this year-end report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this year-end report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this year-end report;
 
 4.  The
Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
 
 (a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this year-end report is being
      prepared; 
 (b)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this year-end report (the "Evaluation Date") based on such evaluation;
      and 
 (c)
    presented
      in this year-end report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
      Evaluation Date; 
 5.  The
Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a)
    all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's
      auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
  and 
 (b)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; 
 6.  The
Company’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this year-end report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 Date:
      April [],
      2005
    By:/s/
      Joseph FasciglioneChief Financial Officer
  28
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 10I


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                    CNT EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
               (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1999)



         This document is an amendment to the CNT Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1999).

         WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, Computer Network Technology Corporation adopted the CNT
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, Section 7.1 of the Plan permits the Plan to be amended in
whole or in part at any time by action of the Board of Directors or by action by
any person to whom the authority has been delegated by the Board; and

         WHEREAS, at its March 19, 2001 meeting, the Board approved amendments
to the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the CNT Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan is amended effective April 1, 2001 by deleting the
words "calendar quarter" each place where they appear in the second sentence of
Section 4.3(b) and substituting therefor the word "month."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of
the 19th day of March, 2001.

                                         COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION



                                         By /s/Gregory T. Barnum
                                         -----------------------
                                          Its Chief Financial Officer
                                          ---------------------------
December 19, 2000


Darrell F. Eckstein
8 Van Gogh Way
Coto de Caza, CA 92679

Dear Darrell:

I am pleased to make you this offer to become the Vice  President of  Operations
for Eclipse Surgical Technologies. You will report directly to me.

Your starting salary will be $225,000 per year, or $9,375 semi-monthly. You will
have a target bonus equivalent to 30% of your salary,  or $67,500 per annum. The
bonus  criteria  will  be  established  between  the  two of us,  and  will be a
combination of company performance and your own personal performance. Naturally,
if the company over-achieves its operating  objectives,  your bonus could exceed
target.

You will receive  100,000  incentive  stock options to be priced on the day that
you begin your new  responsibility.  These  options  will vest over a three-year
period.  There  will be a cliff vest after the first  year:  33 1/3%,  after the
first 12 months,  and then final 66 2/3%,  1/24th per month,  over the final two
years. Options will vest fully in the event of a change in control of Eclipse.

Instead of a relocation  package, I will agree to pay you an additional $2,000 a
month, grossed up for taxes, to be utilized for an apartment over a period of 24
months.

Naturally,  you will  qualify for all  executive  benefit  programs.  There is a
package  describing this attached for your review.  The vacation allowance shall
be 160 hours per year.

In the event of a change of control of Eclipse  that results in  termination  of
employment or termination  without  cause,  salary will be paid as severance for
six months.

I would  like  you to  accept  this  offer  and to  report  for  duty as soon as
possible, given my need to have you managing our operations and projects.

I feel very positive  about the  possibility of having you join our team. I know
that you can have a great  impact  on the  process  of  turning  Eclipse  into a
profitable and successful medical company.

Thank you for your consideration of my offer.

Sincerely,

/s/ Michael Quinn
--------------------
Michael Quinn

Attachments




Acknowledged,


/s/ Darrell Eckstein
--------------------
Darrell Eckstein
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), theundersigned officer of Gryphon Gold Corporation, (the "Company") does herebycertify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") that: 

    1.     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

    2.     The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 9, 2009  

/s/ John L. Key                                 John L. Key Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as partof the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

----