alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Steven C. McNeal, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee.





Dated: March 22, 2018





By:  /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:  Vice President and Treasurer


of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., as Servicer


(Senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
# C_2007150EN.01000201.xml

| 4.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/2

---

NOTICE OF VACANCY

NOTICE OF VACANCY

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

OPEN COMPETITION

OPEN COMPETITION

Ref. CONS/AD/428

ADMINISTRATOR

ADMINISTRATOR

(2007/C 150/02)

The General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union is organising an open competition (on the basis of qualifications and an oral test) to fill the vacancy for an administrator (AD 12) (Head of Unit) in the security field.

(on the basis of qualifications and an oral test)

The selection procedure requires applicants to have a full university education, evidenced by a diploma. A diploma awarded by an institution such as a police or military academy will be considered an advantage.

It is also essential to have had at least 12 years' professional experience, since obtaining the diploma, in the field of security in general, including at least three years at managerial level, as well as a thorough knowledge of all other aspects of security management in a national or international organisation.

This recruitment notice is published in English and French only. The full text, in both languages, appears in Official Journal C 150 A.

It is also possible to consult the notice of vacancy on the Council's website at:

http:/www.consilium.europa.eu/concours

The deadline for submitting applications is 1 August 2007, the postmark serving as proof.

1 August 2007

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Government Properties Trust,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Nancy D. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Date: May 17, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ NANCY D. OLSONNancy D. OlsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Skip to Main Content                    

# H1

## H2

### H3

#### Animal Drugs @ FDA

#### Animal Drugs @ FDA

#### Animal Drugs @ FDA

FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine | FDA Approved Animal Drug Products

FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine

**Contact Us**

**Contact Us**

**Contact Us**

                                                                Site best viewed using Chrome and Firefox browsers.                                                                                                                            Download Adobe Acrobat Reader to view PDF files.Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
# C_2007170EN.01003801.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/38

---

Action brought on 5 June 2007 — Dyckerhoff Polska v Commission

(Case T-196/07)

(2007/C 170/72)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Dyckerhoff Polska sp. z o. o. (represented by: P.K. Rosiak, legal adviser, and F. Puel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the Commission's decision of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Poland in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission's decision of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Poland in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 1295 final of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Poland in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), in which the Commission decided that certain aspects of the Polish National Allocation Plan for CO2 Emission Allowances for 2008-2012, notified to the Commission on 30 June 2006, were not compatible with Articles 9(1) and (3), 10 and 13(2) of and the criteria set out in Annex III to Directive 2003/87/EC. The decision in question reduces the carbon dioxide emission limit in 2008-2012 by 26.7 % compared to the limit proposed by Poland in the national allocation plan for emission allowances notified to the Commission.

1

2

The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the applicant are the same as those of the applicant in Case T-195/07.

---

(1)  Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(a)

[SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD]

                   CONSENT OF SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters"
in the Prospectus filed as part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form N-4
(File No. 333-34894) for ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account A of
ML Life Insurance Company of New York. In giving this consent, we do not admit
that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7
of the Securities Act of 1933.

                                          SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

                                          By:   /s/ KIMBERLY J. SMITH
                                          --------------------------------------
                                               Kimberly J. Smith, Esq.

Washington, D.C.
April 26, 2001
# C_2007170EN.01000601.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 June 2007 — Jacques Wunenburger v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-362/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Staff cases - Promotion - Selection procedure - Rejection of the appellant's candidature - Retirement in the interests of the service - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Error of law - Cross-appeal - Subject-matter of the dispute - Interest in bringing proceedings)

(2007/C 170/09)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Jacques Wunenburger (represented by: E. Boigelot, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents and V. Dehin, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 5 July 2005 in Case T-370/03 Wunenburger v Commission which dismissed the appellant's application for annulment of the Commission's decision not to proceed with his candidature for the post of Director of Directorate ‘Africa, Caribbean, Pacific’ (AIDCO.C) and appointed another candidate to that post.

Wunenburger

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal.

| 2. | Orders Mr Wunenburger to pay the costs of the main appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Wunenburger to pay the costs of the main appeal.

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs of the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs of the cross-appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 12.11.2005.

1

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 877 

To change the treatment of certain Federal programs with respect to 

susceptibility to significant improper payments, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2023 

Mr. MOORE of Utah (for himself and Ms. SPANBERGER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To change the treatment of certain Federal programs with 

respect to susceptibility to significant improper payments, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Improper 

5 Payments Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN NEW PROGRAMS AND AC7 TIVITIES. 

8 Section 3352(a) of title 31, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 877 IH

1 ‘‘(4) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Any program 

2 or activity established by a Federal agency on or 

3 after the date of the enactment of this paragraph 

4 making more than $100,000,000 in payments in a 

5 fiscal year shall be construed to be a program or ac6 tivity with outlays exceeding the statutory threshold 

7 dollar amount described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) that 

8 may be susceptible to significant improper pay9 ment.’’. 

10 SEC. 3. REPORT REQUIREMENT. 

11 Section 3357(d) of title 31, United States Code, is 

12 amended by striking ‘‘For each of fiscal years 2019 and 

13 2020, each’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘Each’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Before the First Division,

January 28, 1943

No. 47964.

#### Protest 940348-G of New York Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The uncontradicted testimony fairly established that the articles in question are metal horns chiefly used on bicycles or tricycles as a warning signal, and that they are composed in chief value of base metal, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was therefore sustained as to this item.
Before the First Division,

January 11, 1940

No. 42983.

#### Petition 5835-R of Charles Happel, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

The petition was dismissed.
(Reap. Dec. 8760)

#### Ellis K. Orlowitz Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 853885.

(Decided March 15, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawreNCE, Judge:

The record indicates that, at the call of the calendar, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

*605Rule *5*(a) of the rules of the court provides that — ■

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 47485.

#### Protest 32146-K of Ciba Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel 57 percent of Preparation 6640 Cone, pat., and 41 percent of Albatex POC pat., were held taxable at 3 cents per pound under section 701, Revenue Act of 1936, as claimed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00129-CV

Appellant, Old HH, Ltd. // Cross-Appellant, Mary Henderson

v.

Appellee, Mary Henderson // Cross-Appellee, Old HH, Ltd.

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 05-821-C368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant/cross-appellee Old HH, Ltd. has filed an unopposed motion requesting

abatement of this appeal while the parties pursue settlement. We grant the motion and abate the

appeal until August 30, 2010. If a settlement has been finalized by that date, the parties are

instructed to file a motion to reinstate and dismiss the appeal in accordance with their settlement

agreement. If the parties have not finalized their settlement by that date, they are instructed to file

a report informing this Court about the status of the appeal and, if necessary, requesting an extension

of the abatement.
__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Abated

Filed: June 16, 2010

2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30979

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER VON NORMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-86 A

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Christopher Von Norman has filed

a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

and we have independently reviewed counsel's brief and the record

and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Norman’s motion for production

of the record, entitled “Petition Request under the Freedom of

Information Act,” is DENIED.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 5

- 00 081

- C V



### ____________________

SHAWNA LEIGH JOHNSON

, Appellant

V.

MOLLY WELLS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 14

- 28464

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellant, Shawna Leigh Johnson , filed a motion to dismiss this appeal.

The motion is voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any decision of this Court.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed notice of appeal. We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMI SSED.2 ________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on March 25, 2015

Opinion Delivered March 26, 2015

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

COMMON STOCK                                                        COMMON STOCK

                      DEMAND FINANCIAL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
    NUMBER                                                      NUMBER OF SHARES

----------------                                             -------------------


               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
               Authorized Common Stock, 25,000,000 $.001 Par Value


                                                              CUSIP# 24802P 10 4

THIS CERTIFIES THAT
Is the recordholder of


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF $.001 PAR VALUE EACH OF


                      DEMAND FINANCIAL INTERNATIONAL, INC.


Hereinafter designated the "Corporation", transferable on the books of the
Corporation upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or assigned.
This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of
the State of Nevada, and to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the
Corporation, as now and or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid
until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

A statement of the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of each
class of stock or series thereof may be obtained upon request without charge,
from the Corporation at its principal executive office.


WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

Dated:



SECRETARY                                                        PRESIDENT



                                       40
#### MAYFAIR FARMS HOLDING CORP., *ET AL.,*PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS, v. TOWN OF WEST ORANGE, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, *ETC.,*RESPONDENT.

*Mr. Louis Lando*and *Mr. Iiarry A. Margolis*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Jacob Slavill*and *Mr. Saul A. Wolfe*for the petitioners-respondents.

May 16, 1967.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Auscrete Corporation (the “Company’) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, John Sprovieri, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 14th day of April, 2015.








/s/John Sprovieri/s/John SprovieriChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**





I,
      Paul
      E. Martin, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of CCH II, LLC and CCH II Capital
      Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that,
      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
      30,
      2005 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:




·
            fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934; and


·
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Paul E. Martin


Paul
      E.
      Martin


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


August
      5,
      2005
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133946 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133946 COA: 268956 Wayne CC: 05-010824-01 KEVIN BINYARD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk