Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Notices 16767 

through September 30, 2006. The 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection 15 days after the publication 

of this notice of rescission of 

administrative review. 

This notice is in accordance with 

section 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: March 23, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–6405 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–405–803, A–401–808, A–421–811, A–201–

834) 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from 

Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, and 

Mexico: Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Determinations of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tyler Weinhold, Robert James (Mexico 

and Finland), or Angelica Mendoza 

(Sweden and the Netherlands), AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1121, (202) 482–

0649, and (202) 482–3019, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 30, 2006, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of an 

antidumping duty administrative review 

for, inter alia, Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, 

Sweden, the Netherlands, and Mexico 

for the December 27, 2004, through June 

30, 2006, period of review (POR). See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 71 FR 51573 (August 30, 2006). On 

December 11, 2006, the Department 

received requests from Aqualon 

Company, a division of Hercules, Inc. 

(Petitioner) that a cost investigation be 

initiated in the review of CMC from 

Finland, Sweden, and the Netherlands. 

See Letters from Petitioner dated 

December 8, 2006. On January 22, 2007, 

the Department initiated a sales below 

cost of production investigation in the 

instant review of CMC from the 

Netherlands. See January 22, 2007, 

memorandum to Richard Weible, 

regarding Petitioner’s allegation of sales 

below the cost of production in the 

review of CMC from the Netherlands. 

On January 24, 2007, the Department 

initiated a sales below cost of 

production investigation in the instant 

review of CMC from Sweden. See 

January 24, 2007, memorandum to 

Richard Weible, regarding Petitioner’s 

allegation of sales below the cost of 

production in the review of CMC from 

Sweden. On February 5, 2007, the 

Department initiated a sales below cost 

of production investigation in the 

instant review of CMC from Finland. 

See February 5, 2007, memorandum to 

Richard Weible, regarding Petitioner’s 

allegation of sales below the cost of 

production in the review of CMC from 

Finland. The preliminary results for 

these administrative reviews are 

currently due no later than April 2, 

2007. 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to complete the 

preliminary results of an administrative 

review within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an order for 

which a review is requested. However, 

if it is not practicable to complete the 

review within these time periods, 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows 

the Department to extend the 245 day 

time period for the preliminary results 

to 365 days. 

The Department has determined it is 

not practicable to complete these 

reviews within the statutory time limit 

because we require additional time to 

conduct sales below–cost investigations 

in these administrative reviews and to 

collect and analyze other information 

needed for our preliminary 

determinations. Accordingly, the 

Department is extending the time limits 

for completion of the preliminary 

results of these administrative reviews 

until no later than July 31, 2007, which 

is 365 days from the last day of the 

anniversary month of these orders. We 

intend to issue the final results in these 

reviews no later than 120 days after 

publication of the preliminary results 

notices. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 30, 2007. 

Stephen Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–6381 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–449–804 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from 

Latvia; Final Results of the Sunset 

Review of Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 27, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published a notice of 

preliminary results of the full sunset 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on steel concrete reinforcing bars 

(‘‘rebar’’) from Latvia pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (‘‘the Act’’). As a result of 

this review, the Department finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order would likely lead to the 

continuation or recurrence of dumping. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Audrey R. Twyman or Brandon 

Farlander, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

1, Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230; 

telephone: 202–482–3534 and 202–482–

0182, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 27, 2006, the 

Department published a notice of 

preliminary results of the full sunset 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on rebar from Latvia pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act. See Steel Concrete 

Reinforcing Bars from Latvia; 

Preliminary Results of the Sunset 

Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 71 

FR 68544 (November 27, 2006) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). We provided 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on our preliminary results. 

The Department received a case brief 

from Joint Stock Company Liepajas 

Metalurgs on January 16, 2007, and a 

rebuttal brief from the Rebar Trade 

Action Coalition and its individual 

producer members Nucor Corporation, 

CMC Steel Group, and Gerdau 

Ameristeel, as well as TAMCO Steel, 

and Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. on 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES