alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8909 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8909

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 82-6110 Mamalahoa Highway in Captain Cook, Hawaii, as the ``Army 1st 
           Lt. John Kuulei Kauhaihao Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARMY 1ST LT. JOHN KUULEI KAUHAIHAO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 82-6110 Mamalahoa Highway in Captain Cook, Hawaii, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Army 1st Lt. John Kuulei Kauhaihao Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Army 1st 
Lt. John Kuulei Kauhaihao Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 8909

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 82-6110 Mamalahoa Highway in Captain Cook, Hawaii, as the ``Army 1st 
           Lt. John Kuulei Kauhaihao Post Office Building''.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Project No. 1494-300—OK] 

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office of Energy Projects reviewed the application for non-project use of project lands and waters for the Pensacola Hydroelectric Project, located on the Grand (Neosho) River in Craig, Delaware, Mayes, and Ottawa Counties, Oklahoma, and has prepared a Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA). 

                    A copy of the DEA is on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection. The DEA may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket                           ( print page 17153)                        number (P-1494) excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                 

Any comments should be filed by May 1, 2007, and should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, Washington, DC 20426. Please reference the project name and project number (P-1494) on all comments. Comments may be filed electronically via Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “eFiling” link. For further information, contact Lesley Kordella at (202) 502-6406. 

Philis J. Posey, 

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-6442 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.8


                             CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION
                            NEVADA-LODE MINING CLAIM

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that DESERT PACIFIC EXPLORATION INC.,
Incorporate in Nevada, whose address is 12475 Overbrook Drive, Reno, Nevada
89511, has located and claimed the Panorama #7 Lode Mining Claim in the
following quarter sections(s):

NE   1/4,    Section           Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB7M
NW   1/4,    Section           Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M
SE   1/4,    Section    11     Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M
SW   1/4,    Section           Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M

In Mineral County, Nevada, on the 30th day of October, 1996.

SAID CLAIM IS A LODE CLAIM, it being situated in the above mentioned County and
State, and is approximately 1500 feet long and 600 feet wide, such that 1475
feet is claimed in an South direction and 25 feet in a North direction from the
point of discovery (monument of location), at which the Notice of Location was
posted, together with 300 feet on each side of the monument of location and
center line of the Claim. The general course of the lode or vein is from the
South to the North.

THE NUMBER, LOCATION, AND MARKINGS On each monument are as follows:

         Location          Markings                Description
         --------          --------                -----------

No. 1 Northeast corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 2 Southeast corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 3 Southwest corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 4 Northwest corner     diagram, metal tag      2"x2"xz4' wooden post

A CLAIM MAP as required by NRS 517.040 is included as part of the work of
location.

Dated:  January 11, 1997

               RECEIVED                   DESERT PACIFIC EXPLORATION INC.
        Bur. Of Land Management
          9:00 A.M.  JAN 24 97            BY: /s/ Herb Duerr
          NEVADA STATE OFFICE                 Herb Duerr, President
             RENO, NEVADA
#### Same *v.*Same.

Order denying motion to set aside taxation of costs reversed, without prejudice to a motion for an award of costs, and without prejudice to a retaxation, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to defendants. Opinion by Hardin, J.
This zip file contains an archive of editions of "Approach" from 2004-2018. GPO has made an effort to be as complete as possible but there may gaps. They have been sorted into publication years. Some of the individual editions have the publication information as part of the file name and some do not. We apologize for this inconvenience but this is how the files were harvested.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 21.1



                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
<Table>
<Caption>

           SUBSIDIARY                                                           JURISDICTION OF FORMATION
           ----------                                                           -------------------------
<S>                                                                   <C>
Knowles Electronics Japan, K.K.                                       Japan
Knowles Electronics (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.                              Malaysia
Knowles Electronics Suzhou Co. Ltd.                                   Peoples Republic of China/Suzhou
Knowles Electronics Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.                       Peoples Republic of China/Shanghai
Knowles Electronics Taiwan, Ltd.                                      Taiwan
Knowles Europe                                                        United Kingdom
Knowles Manufacturing Ltd. ("KML")                                    Delaware
Emkay Innovative Products, Inc.                                       Delaware
Ruf electronics GmbH ("Ruf")                                          Germany
Knowles Electronics LLC                                               Delaware
Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc.                                    Delaware
Ruf Electronics Kft.                                                  Hungary
Ruwido Austria GmbH ("Ruwido")                                        Austria
Ruwido electronics-Entwicklungs-und Vertiebs-Verwaltungs Gmbh         Germany
Ruwido electronics-Entwicklungs-und Vertriebs-GmbH & Co. KG           Germany
Synchro-Start Products Europe Limited                                 United Kingdom
Synchro-Start Products, Inc. ("SSPI")                                 Delaware
Knowles Electronics France                                            France
Knowles Electronics Singapore Pte. Ltd.                               Singapore
Knowles Electronics (Weifang) Co. Ltd.                                Peoples Republic of China/Weifang

</Table>
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(b)
                                ---------------


                        OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY
<PAGE>

               [Transamerica Life Insurance Company Letterhead]

April 10, 2001


Transamerica Life Insurance Company
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa  52499-0001

Re:  Retirement Builder Variable Annuity Account
     (formerly PFL Retirement Builder Variable Annuity Account)
     Registration on Form N-4    SEC File No. 333-7509

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the Retirement Income Builder Variable Annuity
policies are those deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)    the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the
       policies,

(2)    the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the
       policies,

(3)    the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and management
       of the policies and/or riders to the policy and that provides for a
       reasonable margin of  profit.

Fees and charges assessed against the policy values in the Variable Account
include:

(i)    Service Charge and Administrative Charge

(ii)   Mortality and Expense Risk Fee (M&E)

(iii)  Taxes (including Premium and other Taxes if applicable)

(iv)   Surrender Charges

(v)    Any applicable rider fees or charges

The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through (v)
is established in the pricing of the Retirement Income Builder, to achieve a
reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is within the range of industry
practice with respect to comparable variable annuity products.
<PAGE>

Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Page 2
April 10, 2001

Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred.  Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges.  In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the Registration Statement.



/s/ R. Gene Hauser
---------------------------------
R. Gene Hauser
Associate Actuary
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
(formerly PFL Life Insurance Company)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0235 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SHELDON PATRICK TRACY ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 18, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 13 2022

01/13/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0235
7124

#### DESCHAMPS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. R. CO.

1. Continuance. — It is not an abuse of discretion to refuse to continue a case on ground that a foreign witness was not present and his testimony had not been secured, the ease having been commenced six months before trial.

2. Carrier — Freight.—When goods transported by a common carrier have arrived at their destination the liability continues to be that of carrier until consignee has had reasonable time to remove them.

Before Prince;, J., Sumter, November, 1907.

Affirmed.

Action by L. W. DesChamps against Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. Prom judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

*Messrs. P. A. Willcox*and *Mark Reynolds■,*for appellant.

*Mr. Reynolds*cites: *As to refusal of continuance:*50' S'. C., 403; 68 S. C., 26.; 18 S. E., 953; 60 S- C., 293; 10 L- R. A., 749. *Liability of carrier after delivery of freight:*50 S. C., 129.

*Mr. L. D. Jennings,*contra,

cites: *Liability of carrier:*76 S. C., 13: 77 S. C., 76.

*237April 9, 1909.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

A few days before 24th February, 1907, the plaintiff checked from Charleston, S. C., to Sumter, S. C., on defendant’s railroad, a case containing one Gold Medal Computing Scale, used by him as a sample in his business as a traveling salesman. It does not appear when the scale reached Sumter, but it was in the defendant’s baggage room, at Sumter, on 24th February, 1907, when a fire occurred destroying defendant’s depot, including the baggage room. Plaintiff, in his complaint against the defendant, alleged the scale and case to have been destroyed, and sought to recover their full value, one hundred and twenty-two dollars and fifty cents. The evidence tended to show injury only, and the jury found a verdict for fifty dollars; the defendant appeals.

1 The first four exceptions charge abuse of discretion in the refusal of the Circuit Judge to grant a motion for continuance, made on the ground that William J. Walker, an officer of the Toledo Computing Scales Company, would testify, if present, that the scale belonged to that company and not to the plaintiff; and that, after due diligence, the defendant had not had time to secure the presence of Walker as a witness, or to have his testimony taken. The action was commenced on 1st June, 1907, and was not called for trial until November, 1907. The ownership of the scale was one of the issues made by the pleadings. It was certainly not an abuse of discretion for the Circuit Court to hold that six months was sufficient time to ascertain what would be the testimony of the officers of the scales company, and have it taken in Toledo, Ohio, their place of residence.

2 The instructions complained of in the fifth and sixth exceptions were nothing more than a statement of the rule, well established in this State, that when goods transported by a common carrier arrive at their *238déstination the liability continues to be that of a common carrier until the consignee has a reasonable time to remove them. *Brunson*v. *R. R. Co.,*76 S. C., 9, 56 S. E., 538.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.
Exhibit 99.5





CERTIFICATION


I, Darcy Daubaras, certify that:




1           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Extorre Gold Mines Limited;




2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-5(f) for the issuer and have:




(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date: March 28, 2011

By:
/s/ Darcy DaubarasDarcy DaubarasChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:11-cr-128-7

Franklin D. Lonas, Jr. 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 428) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: December 20, 2011 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cr-00128-JLG-TPK Doc #: 457 Filed: 12/20/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
| Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------------|

|   |                              |                          |
|--------|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|   | /s/ James K. Price                |
|   | Name:                             | James K. Price                |
|   | Title:                            | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | Date:                             | February 29, 2012             |
|   |                              |                          |
|   | /s/ J. Miguel Fernandez de Castro |
|   | Name:                             | J. Miguel Fernandez de Castro |
|   | Title:                            | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   | Date:                             | February 29, 2012             |
#### Williamsport Redevelopment Authority Appeal.

Argued January 14, 1969.

Before Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*Richard II. Roesgen,*with him *McNerney, Page, Yanderlin & Hall,*for appellant.

*554April 23, 1969:

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Bell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17152-17153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1494-300--OK]


Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA); Notice of Availability of Draft 
Environmental Assessment

April 2, 2007.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office of Energy Projects 
reviewed the application for non-project use of project lands and 
waters for the Pensacola Hydroelectric Project, located on the Grand 
(Neosho) River in Craig, Delaware, Mayes, and Ottawa Counties, 
Oklahoma, and has prepared a Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA).
    A copy of the DEA is on file with the Commission and is available 
for public inspection. The DEA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket

[[Page 17153]]

number (P-1494) excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online 
Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#094f4c5b4a46676560676c5a7c7979667b7d496f6c7b6a276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c1878493828eafada8afa492b4b1b1aeb3b581a7a4b3a2efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, 
or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    Any comments should be filed by May 1, 2007, and should be 
addressed to the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Room 1-A, Washington, DC 20426. Please reference the 
project name and project number (P-1494) on all comments. Comments may 
be filed electronically via Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission 
strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) 
and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``eFiling'' 
link. For further information, contact Lesley Kordella at (202) 502-
6406.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-6442 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### John G. Smith and others, *Respondents, v.*Jonathan Longmire and Charles C. Pinckney, *Appellants.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Davis, P. J.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10(ii)

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
GE Capital Life Assurance Company of New York
     and
Contractholders
GE Capital Life Separate Account II

We consent to the use of our reports included herein and to the reference
to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the Statement of Additional
Information.

                                                /s/ KPMG LLP

Richmond, VA
April 19, 2001