alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO



18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the report of BASSLINE PRODUCTIONS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|       |                   |     |        | BASSLINE
        PRODUCTIONS, INC.                      
|------ | ----------------- | --- | ------ | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: | February 18, 2014 | By: |        | /s/
    Tamio Stehrenberger                             
|       |                   |     | Name:  | Tamio Stehrenberger                                     
|       |                   |     | Title: | Chief Executive Officer                                 
|       |                   |     |        | (Principal Executive Officer)                           
|       |                   |     |        |                                                         
|       |                   |     |        |                                                         
|Dated: | February 18, 2014 | By: |        | /s/
    Tamio Stehrenberger                             
|       |                   |     | Name:  | Tamio Stehrenberger                                     
|       |                   |     | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief
    Financial Officer
|       |                   |     |        | (Principal Financial Officer)                           
|       |                   |     |        |                                                         





A
signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to of Bassline Productions,
Inc. and will be retained by of Bassline Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

CAROL PEMBER, * 

 * No. 15-1005

 Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

 * 

v. * 

 * Filed: August 22, 2017 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Stipulation; trivalent influenza (“flu”) 

 * vaccine; brachial neurities. 

 Respondent. * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Richard Gage, Richard Gage, PC, Cheyenne, WY, for Petitioner;

Glenn Macleod, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On August 21, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the 

petition for compensation filed by Carol Pember on September 11, 2015. In her

petition, petitioner alleged that the trivalent influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which is 

contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a), and 

which she received on October 4, 2012, caused her to suffer brachial neuritis. 

 Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this injury 

for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award 

or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her 

condition.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer brachial 

neuritis or any other injury. 

 1

 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and 

Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its 

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing 

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). 

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. 
2 

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The 

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the 

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. 

 

Damages awarded in that stipulation include: 

A lump sum payment of $110,000.00 in the form of a check payable to 

petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that 

would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, 

the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 15-1005V according to this decision 

and the attached stipulation.2

 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 s/Christian J. Moran

 Christian J. Moran

 Special Master

 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each 

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal 

Claims judge.
**Exhibit 15.1**

 
|        |                                                                                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Frost & Sullivan (Beijing) Inc., Shanghai Branch Co.  |
|   | 2802-2803, Tower A, Dawning Center                                       |
|   | 500 Hongbaoshi Road                                                                |
|   | Shanghai, 201103                                                                        |
|   | P.R.China                                                                                    |
|   | Tel:  +86 21 5407 5780 / 81 / 82 / 83 |
|   | Fax: +86 21 3209 8500                                                    |
|   | **www.frost.com**                                                                            |

 

March 11th, 2011

 

Shandong Borun Industrial Co., Ltd

Bohai Industrial Park (South of Yangkou Town) 

Shouguang, Shandong 262715, China

Tel: (86) 536-5451199

Fax: (86) 536-5451199      5451006

 

Attention: Mr. Jinmiao Wang, CEO of Shandong Borun Industrial Co., Ltd

 

***Letter of Authorization to Use Frost & Sullivan Research******Data for******Fundraising Activities, News and Disclosure, Annual Reports, Presentations, Promotional Material, and Other Similar Purposes***

 

Dear Mr. Wang:

 

Frost & Sullivan (“F&S”) hereby consents to the quotation by Shandong Borun Industrial Co., Ltd in its fundraising activities, news and disclosure, annual reports, presentations, promotional material, and other similar purposes of research data, information, charts and graphs from F&S’s industry research report entitled *Independent Market Research for Edible Alcohol Market in China, 2010*prepared by Frost & Sullivan (Beijing) Inc., Shanghai Branch Co., and any of its supplements.

 

 
|   | Kind regards,            |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
|   | **Frost & Sullivan** |
|   |                     |
|   | By:                      | /s/ NEIL X. WANG |
|   |                     |
|   | Name:                    | NEIL X. WANG |
|   |                     |   |
|   | Title:                   | GENERAL MANAGER |
|   |                     |   |
|   |                     | [SEAL] |
|        |                          |  |  |

* *

* *

*Mountain View    New York    San Antonio    Toronto    London   Oxford   Paris   Frankfurt   Milan   Moscow   Warszawa   Sophia Antipolis   Beijing   Shanghai   Shenzhen    Hong Kong   Tokyo   Seoul   Singapore   Kuala Lumpur   Bangkok   Jakarta   Sydney   Auckland   Mumbai   Delhi   Chennai   Bengaluru   Kolkata   Colombo   Dhaka   Dubai   Istanbul   Tel Aviv   Cape Town    Buenos Aires   Bogotá   Mexico City   São Paulo*

 

----
No. 47461.

#### Protests 863157-G, etc., of Abels Wasserberg & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Lafayette Radio Electronics Corporation of Monroeville *v.*Jonnel Enterprises, Inc., Appellant.

Argued May 26, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*50*Aaron Rosenzweig,*with him *Samuel M. Rosenzweig,*and *Rosenzweig & Rosenzweig,*for appellant.

*.Norman J. Oowie,*with him *Thomson, Rhodes & Grigsby,*for appellee.

June 27, 1969:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

In this action the plaintiff-tenant sought and obtained a permanent injunction restraining defendant-landlord’s use of distraint for rent and a mandatory injunction requiring arbitration. The chancellor entered an order to this effect, noting exceptions to the defendant, from which the present appeal was taken. The findings of fact, conclusions of law, adjudication and exceptions must be reviewed by the court en banc before a final decree may be entered. Pa. R. C. P., 1517-1519; *Cooney v. Pennsylvania Osteopathic Association,*434 Pa. 358, 253 A. 2d 256*(1969); Sessa v. Melnick,*420 Pa. 257, 216 A. 2d 56 (1966). This appeal is premature and must be quashed.

Appeal quashed. Costs on appellant.

Mr. Justice Jones took no part in the consideration or decision of this case,
March 13, 1962

Reap. Dec. 10201.

#### John V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R60/15149.

Reappraisement dismissed February 6, 1962. Entered at Detroit, Mich. (Not published.) Motion by plaintiff.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7234** 

JOHNNY DWAYNE ADAMS , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. DR. OFOUGHT; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT AT SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; RICK NIECE, Charge Nurse , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. ( 7:12

- cv - 00462

- NKM

- RSB )

Submitted : January 30, 2015 Decided: February 9 , 2015

Before KEENAN and THACKER , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Johnny Dwayne Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Jennifer Dillow Royer, GUYNN & DILLON, P.C., Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpubli shed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Johnny Dwayne Adams appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint , finding that Adams failed to exhaust his administrative remedies . We hav e reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Adams v. Ofought , No. 7:12

- cv - 00462

- NKM

- RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2014)
. We deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral a rgument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is C ourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc. for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2012, I, Arthur
D. Viola, Chief Executive Officer of Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2012, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending
November 30, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Daniels Corporate
Advisory Company, Inc.

Date: March 7, 2013.

/s/ Arthur D.
ViolaArthur D. Viola, Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:11-CR-042

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP

RAUL LORENTE MORENO, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On March 11, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Count One

of the Information charging him with being an alien found unlawfully in the United States after

previously being deported in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1326(a) and (b)(1). Defendant, represented by

counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge

conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s

plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:11-cr-00042-GCS Doc #: 21 Filed: 04/25/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
-2-

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

being an alien found unlawfully in the United States after previously being deported. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:11-cr-00042-GCS Doc #: 21 Filed: 04/25/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
CERTIFICATION OF
          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of 355, Inc.
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, Alex Jen, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of 355, Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 355,
          Inc.

Dated:  November 22, 2004

355, Inc.


By: /s/ Alex Jen
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

5 filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 29,906

10 GERALD RAY ZUNIGA,

11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT DOÑA ANA COUNTY 

13 Lisa C. Schultz, District Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General 

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 Max Shepherd, Assistant Attorney General 

17 Albuquerque, NM 

18 for Appellee

19 Hugh W. Dangler, Chief Public Defender

20 Santa Fe, NM

21 Loni J. Hodge, Assistant Public Defender

22 Las Cruces, NM

23 for Appellant

24 MEMORANDUM OPINION

25 BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
2

1 Defendant has appealed from the revocation of his probation, challenging the

2 sufficiency of the evidence to support the enhancement of his sentence pursuant to

3 NMSA 1978, Section 31-18-17 (2003). We issued a notice of proposed summary

4 disposition, proposing to reverse and remand for resentencing. The State has filed a

5 responsive document entitled “Memorandum in Opposition,” which expresses no

6 opposition to our proposal to reverse for want of an adequate showing below, and

7 which expresses agreement with our proposal to remand for resentencing.

8 Accordingly, for the reasons stated, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 

11 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

12 WE CONCUR:

13 

14 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

15 

16 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), we, Nathaniel F. Bradley IV, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Mark A. Redman, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (a)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Nathaniel F. Bradley IVNathaniel F. Bradley IVChief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2005/s/ Mark A. RedmanMark A. RedmanChief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2005
(Reap. Dec. 8197)

#### Italian Shipping Co. a/c Chistando & Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 778790.

(Decided January 29, 1953)

*William Whynman*for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale on the respective dates of exportation, packed, ready for delivery to all purchasers, in the principal market of the United States, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, after deducting customs duties and all necessary expenses, commissions and profits not in excess of the maximum amount authorized by law, are as follows for the respective items enumerated:

> Item No. 16 $3.04 per gross, net packed

> Item No. 7_ 9.57 per dozen, net packed

> Item.No. 5_ 3.99 " " "

> Item No. 2_ 6.26 " " "

> Item No. 9_ 7.32 " " "

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there is no foreign or export value for said merchandise, as such values are defined in Section 402 (c) and (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find the United States value, as that value is defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in-, volved, and that such values were as follows:

> *513Item No. 16_ net packed $3.04 per gross,

> Item No. 7_ net packed 9.57 per dozen,

> Item No. 6_ 3.99 " " "

> Item No. 2___ 6.26 " " "

> Item No. 9_'_ 7.32 " " "

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Government Properties Trust, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nancy D. Olson, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.   Date: November 3, 2005 /s/ Nancy D. Olson       Nancy D. Olson   Chief Financial Officer and   Treasurer 
26
Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A GENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLICY

M EMORANDUM SUBJECT: Transmittal to Docket: Summary of t he March 1 1, 2011, Public Meeting in

New York , New York, regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s Implementation of Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review FROM: Stuart C. Miles - McLean

Office of Regulatory Policy and Management TO: Public Docket #EPA - HQ - OA - 2011 - 0156: Im p roving Regulations: General As called for b y President Obama in Executive Order 13563, "to facilitate the periodic review of existing significant regulations," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering "how best to promote retrospective analy sis of rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify , streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been learned." As part of its retrospective re view of regulatio ns, EPA convened public meetings around the country to gather input on how we might design the plan we will use to periodicall y review our regulations. T his Memo transmits to the docket a summary of the public meeting held on March 1 1 , 20 11, in New York, New York
.
No. 65579.

#### I. Kalfus Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/23515 and 60/23518 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Prom a review of the record in these cases, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protests were, therefore, overruled.