alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8865 

To nullify Executive Order 14072 and prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture 

and the Secretary of the Interior from implementing, administering, 

or enforcing such Executive Order or any substantially similar executive 

order. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2024 

Mr. LAMALFA (for himself, Mr. NEWHOUSE, and Mr. TIFFANY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, Foreign Affairs, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To nullify Executive Order 14072 and prohibit the Secretary 

of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior from 

implementing, administering, or enforcing such Executive 

Order or any substantially similar executive order. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SEC. 1. NULLIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 14072. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Executive Order 14072 (87 Fed. 

5 Reg. 24851) shall have no force or effect. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8865 IH

1 (b) PROHIBITION ON IMPLEMENTATION.—The Sec2 retary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior 

3 shall not— 

4 (1) implement, administer, or enforce any rule 

5 or regulation issued for the purpose of carrying out 

6 Executive Order 14072 (87 Fed. Reg. 24851) or any 

7 substantially similar executive order; or 

8 (2) develop, finalize, or issue a rule or regula9 tion for the purpose of carrying out Executive Order 

10 14072 or any substantially similar executive order. 

11 (c) PROHIBITION ON TAKING PROPOSED ACTIONS.— 

12 The Secretary of Agriculture shall not— 

13 (1) finalize the environmental impact statement 

14 No. 20240110 included in the Forest Service notice 

15 entitled ‘‘Land Management Plan Direction for Old16 Growth Forest Conditions Across the National For17 est System’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 52039 (June 21, 2024)); 

18 or 

19 (2) take the proposed actions included in such 

20 notice or any substantially similar actions. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John A. Scarlett, M.D., certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Tercica, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tercica, Inc.



Date: May 16, 2005



By:

/s/ John A. Scarlett, M.D.John A. Scarlett, M.D.Chief Executive Officer




This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Tercica, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Velti plc on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alex Moukas, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:April 11, 2011By:/s/ Alex MoukasAlex MoukasChief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Timothy P. Lynch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Tercica, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tercica, Inc.



Date: November 12, 2004



By:

/s/ Timothy P. LynchTimothy P. LynchChief Financial Officer




This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Tercica, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v J. L. JEFFERIES, Airman Second Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant

12 USCMA 259, 30 CMR 259

No. 14,743

Decided March 31, 1961

*Colonel James L. Kilgore*and *Major William A. Crawford, Jr.,*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel Merlin W. Baker*and *Captain Donald W. Brewer*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused was found guilty of larceny of a record player, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 10 USC § 921. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, confinement at hard labor for three months, and forfeiture of ?30.00 per month for three months. Following affirmance by intermediate appellate authorities, we granted his petition for review.

Examination of the record of trial discloses that the prosecution was permitted to adduce testimony from an air police investigator concerning his opinion whether the accused intended to steal the property involved in the specification. This was prejudicial error. United States v Adkins, 5 USCMA 492, 18 CMR 116. The accused, however, judicially confessed to the lesser offense of wrongful appropriation. Accordingly, the foregoing errors do not require a complete reversal.

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force. A rehearing may be ordered, or the sentence may be reassessed on the basis of findings of guilty of wrongful appropriation.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

Accused judicially confessed taking *260the record player, and thus the principal question left in issue was his intent. I agree that the investigator’s testimony that the accused did not intend to return the property was incompetent, and manifestly the improper evidence went to the gravity of the offense. It should be pointed out, however, that accused was defended in this special court-martial not only by his appointed defense counsel, who was a qualified attorney, but in addition by individual counsel, a lawyer with some ten years’ experience. But no objection was taken to the incompetent testimony, and there can be no doubt defense counsel was aware of its nature, for he immediately cross-examined the investigator on the basis for his conclusion and obtained the concession that it was based on speculation. Even then a motion to strike was not made. Ordinarily I would impose a waiver under those circumstances because when the evidence is considered in its totality, no miscarriage of justice would result. Cf. United States v King, 12 USCMA 71, 30 CMR 71. My associates, however, recently refused to invoke that doctrine in an equally clear situation in United States v Smith, 12 USCMA 127, 30 CMR 127. Once again they are apparently unwilling to do so, and no good purpose would be served by arguing the point further in this case. Accordingly, I concur in the result.
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

          I, Merrill B. Blanksteen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer hereby certify that NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.

|   |   | / s / Merrill B. Blanksteen                        |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Merrill B. Blanksteen                                                                                                                                                 |
|   |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial                                                                                                                             |
|   |   | Officer and Treasurer                                                                                                                                                 |

Date: November 6, 2007

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21081 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MICHAEL J. DOUGLASS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-284-4

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael J. Douglass appeals his guilty-plea conviction for selling false obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 473. Douglass argues that the Government breached the plea agreement because it had no intention to stand by or support its U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 motion, that the district court erred in allowing the testimony of a victim, and that the district court erred in its computation of losses. Pursuant to his plea agreement with the Government, DouglassNo. 96-21081 -2- waived his right to appeal his sentence except as to a sentence imposed outside applicable range. The sentence he received fell within that range. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the waiver was informed and voluntary and is therefore binding on Douglass. See United States v. Melancon , 972 F.2d 566, 567-68 (5th Cir. 1992).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Long Only Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Long Only Commodity Series.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                    
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Long Only Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                                                      
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                                                       
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                                           
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Long Only Commodity Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund              

Date: August 13, 2007
1

Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn

Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 5:28 PM

To: Brunner, Christine

Subject: FW: EO 12866 Comments on EPA Tier 3 draft final rule (2060-AQ86)

Attachments: EO_12866_ Tier 3_Final_Rule_Summary_CommentsV3_2_21_2014.docx

Please docket 

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 5:22 PM 

To: Sargeant, Kathryn 

Subject: EO 12866 Comments on EPA Tier 3 draft final rule (2060-AQ86) 

Kathryn, 

 Attached are some of the EO 12866 interagency comments on the Tier 3 draft final rule (2060-AQ86). I will send any 

others as soon as possible. 

Regards, 

Chad
ex10-10.htm


    


    EXHIBIT 10.10

    
      	
              
                CONFIDENTIAL
      TREATMENT REQUESTED

                --

                CONFIDENTIAL
      PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY
      FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
  COMMISSION

              

            


    

     

    
       

      
        	  

                FIRST
      AMENDMENT

                TO

                INGOT
      AND WAFER SUPPLY AGREEMENT

                 

              


      

       

    

    THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO INGOT AND
WAFER SUPPLY AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made
as of May 13, 2008, by and between SUNPOWER CORPORATION (“SunPower”), a
Delaware corporation, and JIAWEI SOLARCHINA CO., LTD.
(“Jiawei”), a
Chinese company.

     

    WHEREAS, SunPower and Jiawei
previously entered into that certain Ingot and Wafer Supply Agreement (the
“Original
Agreement”) dated December 3, 2007;

     

    WHEREAS, SunPower and Jiawei
desire to amend the Original Agreement as set forth herein;

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, FOR VALUABLE
CONSIDERATION, including, without limitation, the covenants set forth
herein, SunPower and Jiawei hereby agree as follows:

     

    
      	
              1.

            	
              Section
      3.3.  The following new Subsection 3.3 is added to the
      end of Section 3 of the Original
Agreement:

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              3.3

            	
              * *
      *

            


    

     

    
      	
              3.

            	
              Miscellaneous.  Except
      as amended hereby, the Original Agreement shall continue in full force and
      effect.

            


    

     

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SunPower
and Jiawei have executed this Amendment as of the date first above
written.

     

     

    


    
      
        	
                SUNPOWER
      CORPORATION, 

                a Delaware corporation

              	 	 	
                 JIAWEI SOLARCHINA CO.,
      LTD.,

                a Chinese company

                 

              	 
	
                By:
      /s/ Jon
      Whiteman 

              	 	 	
                By:
      /s/ Ding Kong
      Xian

              	 
	
                Name:
      Jon
      Whiteman

              	 	 	
                Name:
      Ding Kong
      Xian

              	 
	
                Title:
      VP Strategic
      Supply

                5-14-08  

              	 	 	
                Title:
      President 

                5-14-08

              	 


      



    


    


    


    


    ***
CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL REDACTED AND SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
Exhibit 10.15

Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation effective for 2015*

Directors, other than the Preferred Director, who are not employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and who do not have a compensatory agreement providing for service as a director of the Company or any of its subsidiaries will receive the following compensation for 2015:

 


	
Annual retainer for each Director, paid quarterly in advance
	
 
	
$
	
35,000
	
 

	
Additional annual retainer for Chairman of the Board,  and the Chairs of the Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees
	
 
	
$
	
5,000
	
 

	
Additional annual retainer for Chair of the Audit Committee
	
 
	
$
	
15,000
	
 




The Company pays each director’s reasonable travel, lodging, meals and other expenses connected with their Board service.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8893 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8893

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements in 
the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs relating to 
                    burials, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2024

 Mr. James (for himself, Mr. Deluzio, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Davis of North 
 Carolina, and Mr. Luttrell) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements in 
the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs relating to 
                    burials, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving Veterans' Legacy Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. HEADSTONES AND MARKERS FOR GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS BURIED IN 
              GROUP INTERMENTS.

    Section 2306 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (k) as subsection (l); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (j) the following new 
        subsection (k):
    ``(k)(1) In lieu of a headstone or marker for an individual under 
this section, the Secretary may furnish a single appropriate headstone 
or marker for a group of individuals buried in a group interment if 
each individual of such group is eligible for a headstone or marker 
furnished under this section.
    ``(2) The authority to furnish a headstone or marker under 
paragraph (1) shall terminate on the date that is seven years after the 
date of the enactment of the Preserving Veterans' Legacy Act of 
2024.''.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR BURIAL OF SPOUSES AND DEPENDENT 
              CHILDREN WHO PREDECEASE VETERANS AND ACTIVE DUTY MEMBERS 
              OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    Section 2402(a)(5) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``October 1, 2024'' and inserting ``October 1, 2031''.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|             | By:    | /s/ Mark S. Robinow |   |
|------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|             |   | Mark S. Robinow          |   |
|             |   | Chief Financial Officer  |   |
| October 29, 2010 |   |                     |   |