alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10 (a)
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration
Statement No. 333-82957 of Sun Life of Canada (U.S.) Variable Account F on Form
N-4 of our report dated February 9, 2001 accompanying the financial statements
of Regatta, Regatta Gold, Regatta Classic, Regatta Platinum, Regatta Extra,
Regatta Access, Regatta Choice, and Regatta Flex 4 Sub-Accounts included in Sun
Life of Canada (U.S.) Variable Account F and of our report dated February 9,
2001 accompanying the financial statements of Futurity, Futurity II, Futurity
Focus, Futurity Accolade, Futurity Focus II, Futurity III, and Futurity Select
Four Sub-Accounts included in Sun Life of Canada (U.S.) Variable Account F
appearing in each of the Statements of Additional Information, which are part of
such Registration Statement, to the use of our report dated February 7, 2001
accompanying the financial statements of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
(U.S.) appearing in each of the Statements of Additional Information, which are
part of such Registration Statement, and to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated February 7, 2001 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) for the year ended December 31,
2000.

We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Accountants" and
"Appendix J - Condensed Financial Information - Accumulation Units Values" in
such Prospectuses and under the heading "Financial Statements" in such
Statements of Additional Information.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts

April 23, 2001
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, Nikola Bicanic, Chief Executive Officer of Flikmedia, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the
    Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (2) | the
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.                                                                                     



|Dated:
    April 14, 2016 | By:    | /s/
    Nikola Bicanic     
|------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------
|                          | Name:  | Nikola
    Bicanic         
|                          | Title: | Chief
    Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rion B.
Needs, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark A. Redman, Senior Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Rion B. NeedsRion B. NeedsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 4, 2009/s/ Mark A. RedmanMark A. RedmanSenior Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 4, 2009
#### Yolande ASSAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL, Mount Sinai Hospital Services, Leon J. Davis, President, John Doe, Secretary-Treasurer, District 1199, National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, a Division of the Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union, AFL-CIO, an Unincorporated Association, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99, Docket 82-7251.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Remanded Oct. 3, 1983.

Decided Jan. 3, 1984.

*838Before OAKES, VAN GRAAFEILAND and MESKILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In our earlier decision, *Assad v. Mount Sinai Hospital,*703 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1983), we distinguished *United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell,*451 U.S. 56, 101 S.Ct. 1559, 67 L.Ed.2d 732 (1981), and held that in a suit by an employee against an employer for wrongful discharge and against the union for breach of its duty of fair representation brought pursuant to section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (1976), in which no arbitration took place, the more appropriate limitations period for the claim against the employer was the six month period found in section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 160(b) (1976). However, we felt bound by *Flowers v. Local 2602 of the United Steelworkers,*671 F.2d 87 (2d Cir.), *cert. granted,*459 U.S. 1034, 103 S.Ct. 442, 74 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982), to apply a three year statute of limitations to the claim against the union. Recognizing that our application of disparate limitations periods, created practical problems, we said in *Assad:*“The entire panel looks forward to guidance from the Supreme Court when it considers *Flowers.”*703 F.2d at 44 n. 3. That guidance has now been provided.

On June 8, 1983 the Supreme Court decided *DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters,*— U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 2281, 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983), and *United Steelworkers v. Flowers, id.*In a joint decision the Court announced that a federal statute of limitations, namely, the six month period provided by section 10(b) of the NLRA, should govern both claims against the employer and the union.

On October 3, 1983 the Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in this case, vacated the judgment and remanded the case to us for further consideration in light of *DelCostello. District 1199 v.*Assad, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 54, 78 L.Ed.2d 73 (1983).

Because Assad failed to commence her action against the employer and the union within the six month period we affirm the order of the district court dismissing the complaint against all defendants.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quanta Capital Holdings Ltd. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Jonathan J. R. Dodd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                      
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 8, 2008

/s/ Jonathan J.R. Dodd
Jonathan J. R. Dodd
(Principal Financial Officer)

This certification is not deemed to be ‘‘filed’’ for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

---
No. 48624.

#### Protests 633866-G, etc., of Westergaard Berg Johnsen (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that involved in Abstracts 42146 and 48269 and *Scaramelli & Co.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706). In accordance therewith the claim for an allowance of 2)4 percent in the weight was sustained.
SERVED: JULY 22, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EXTREME ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA~2015-1322 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

. '-, 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

- . ; ; 

This proceeding (heretofore designated.as Case No. 2015NM730008) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. __ 

/ 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Samuel K. Burlum, President/CEO 

Extreme Energy Solutions, Inc., Respondent 

15 0 Main Street 

Ogdensburg, NJ 07439 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West ih Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

Hon. J .E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

DocketNo. FAA-2015-1322 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
Order entered July 25, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00546-CV

No. 05-18-00675-CV

No. 05-18-00676-CV

No. 05-18-00774-CV

RUTH TORRES, Appellant

V.

MARIE DIAZ, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-08711

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 21, 2018 “Motion for Shared Records for Companion 

Cases.” By opinion and judgment dated July 3, 2018, the Court dismissed the appeal in appellate 

cause number 05-18-00546-CV for want of jurisdiction. By order dated July 17, 2018, the Court 

designated the appeals in appellate cause numbers 05-18-00675-CV and 05-18-00676-CV as 

companion cases. We directed the Clerk of this Court to transfer a copy of the clerk’s record and 

reporter’s records filed in appellate cause number 05-18-00675-CV into appellate cause number 

05-18-00676-CV. Appellate cause number 05-18-00774-CV is a mandamus proceeding and not 
a companion case to appellant’s remaining two appeals. For these reasons, we DENY

appellant’s motion. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

April 21, 2021

Order 

Clerk

April 21, 2021

162886(105)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 162886

v COA: 348659

Genesee CC: 15-037634-FC

KEONTE RASHAAD SADLER,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to waive filing fees

is GRANTED as to this case only.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8671 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8671

      To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish the 
  Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2024

 Mr. Pfluger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish the 
  Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``DHS Intelligence Rotational 
Assignment Program and Law Enforcement Support Act''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY INTELLIGENCE ROTATIONAL 
              ASSIGNMENT PROGRAM.

    Section 844 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 414) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program.--
            ``(1) Establishment.--Not later than one year after the 
        date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall 
        establish an Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program as part 
        of the Rotation Program under subsection (a).
            ``(2) Eligibility.--The Intelligence Rotational Assignment 
        Program shall be open to analysts serving in analyst positions 
        in an intelligence component of the Department, in the Office 
        of Strategic Intelligence and Information of the United States 
        Secret Service, or in other positions in the Department, as 
        determined by the Secretary.
            ``(3) Coordination.--The responsibilities specified in 
        subsection (a)(3)(B) that apply to the Rotation Program under 
        such subsection shall, as applicable, apply to the Intelligence 
        Rotational Assignment Program under this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

of Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted by Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief executive officer of Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ H. Dean Jones II

H. Dean Jones II

President

(Chief Executive Officer)

Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC

October 21, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 894 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 894

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for limitations on 
 copayments for contraception furnished by the Department of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2023

 Ms. Brownley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for limitations on 
 copayments for contraception furnished by the Department of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Access to Contraception for 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON COPAYMENTS FOR CONTRACEPTION.

    Section 1722A(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``to pay'' and all that follows through the 
        period and inserting ``to pay--''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
            ``(A) an amount in excess of the cost to the Secretary for 
        medication described in paragraph (1); or
            ``(B) an amount for any contraceptive item for which 
        coverage under health insurance coverage is required without 
        the imposition of any cost-sharing requirement pursuant to 
        section 2713(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
        300gg-13(a)(4)).''.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-04-0449-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	OCTOBER 5, 2004

	______________________________

	RAFEEQ YAASEENIBNSIDDEEQ,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

	NO. A15593-0408; HON. ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	Appellant Rafeeq Yaaseenibnsiddeeq appeals from an order denying his writ of habeas corpus.  The reporter’s record is due in this cause.  An extension of the applicable deadline was sought by the court reporter.  To justify the extension, the court reporter represented that appellant has failed to submit a written designation for the record, failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for the record, and has been unable to contact appellant.  Though appointed an attorney at trial, nothing of record shows that appellant remained indigent and entitled to a free record on appeal.  Kahmann v. State, 873 S.W.2d 785, 789 (Tex. App.--Austin 1994, pet. ref’d) (stating that establishing indigency at the time of trial does not establish indigency at the time of appeal). 

	Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 64th District Court of Hale County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall  immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following: 

     	1.  whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 

     	2.  whether appellant is indigent; and, 

     	3.  whether the appellant is entitled to appointed counsel and a free appellate 

	record. 

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed.  So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a supplemental reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing.  Should it be determined that appellant wishes to prosecute the appeal, is indigent, and is entitled to an appointed attorney but has none, then the trial court shall appoint counsel, unless appellant knowingly and voluntarily waives counsel.  Furthermore, the name, address, and phone number of any counsel appointed by the trial court to represent appellant shall be included in the supplemental record.  The trial court shall also file both supplemental records with the clerk of this court on or before November 4, 2004.  Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then it must be requested before November 4, 2004. 

      It is so ordered. 

                                                                             Per Curiam 

 Do not publish.
#### State, *ex rel.*Katie M. Lyman, v. The City of Daytona Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., E. H. Armstrong, as Mayor-Commissioner, *et*al., as Zone Commissioners, who, with the Mayor-Commissioner, constitute the City Commission of the City of Daytona Beach, *et al.*

176 So. 847.

Opinion Filed November 6, 1937.

*M. G. Rowe,*for Relator;

*Leon J. C. Hartón,*for Respondents.

*897Buford, J.

This case is before us on motion for peremptory writ of mandamus, the return to the alternative writ notwithstanding.

We have considered the record, the briefs and argument by counsel for the respective parties, and we find that the return alleges no sufficient facts to constitute a defense to the alternative writ.

It appears, however, that it would cause great confusion and inconvenience to the taxpayers, as well as to the defendant municipality for the peremptory writ to require the levy mentioned in the alternative writ to be entered on the tax rolls for 1937. Therefore, the alternative writ will be amended so as to apply to the tax roll of 1938.

The alternative writ seeks' to coerce the levy of a tax sufficient to pay five $1,000.00 bonds which have long been in default, together with interest on such bonds at 6% per annum since the 15th day of July, 1933.

It appears that when the alternative writ shall have been amended as above stated the relator is entitled to have judgment for peremptory writ in accordance therewith.

Proceedings in mandamus are equitable in nature and, therefore, the writ may be controlled according to equitable principles. State, *ex rel.*Bottome, v. City of St. Petersburg, *et al.,*126 Fla. 233, 170 Sou. 730.

Having considered the issues and contentions presented in this case in the light of the opinion and judgment' in the case just above cited, it is our judgment that equitable considerations demand a stay in part of the execution of the peremptory writ of mandamus to be issued in this cause. It is, therefore, now adjudged that the execution of the peremptory writ of mandamus as' to $2,000.00 of the principal of the bonds constituting the basis of relator’s claim, together with interest thereon from January 1, 1938, shall be *898stayed until the making up of the tax roll of the respondent corporation for the year 1939, while the writ shall be as promptly as may be executed by entering on the tax rolls of the municipal respondent for the year 1938 a sufficient levy to produce the sum of $3,000.00 principal with interest on the full amount of $5,000.00 from the 15th day of July, 1933, to the 1st day of January, 1938.

It is so ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.