alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stern Bros. (Globe Shipping Co., Inc.) et al. *v.*United States

No. 7493.

Entry Nos. 704361; 713902; 705764.

Invoices dated Hanley, England, June 1945, etc.

Certified June 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 31, 1945, etc.

(Decided December 23, 1947)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in the reappraise-ments listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and'hold that the export values of the merchandise are the values found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry *343by the importers by reason of advances by tile appraiser in similar cases to equal the British purchase tax, so-called.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Ante5, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) Bradley Berman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: March 31, 2011








By:  /s/ Bradley Berman


Bradley Berman, Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 21.0

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                                      |  |                                             |  |                     |     |  
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | --- | -
|Parent                                                |  | State or OtherJurisdiction 
ofIncorporation |  | PercentageOwnership |    
|Madison Bancorp, Inc.                                 |  | Maryland                                    |  |                     |     |  
|                                                      |  |                                            
|Subsidiary                                            |  |                                             |  |                     |    
|Madison Square Federal Savings Bank                   |  | United States                               |  |                     | 100 | %
|                                                      |  |                                            
|Subsidiary of Madison Square Federal Savings Bank (1) |  |                                             |  |                     |    
|Madison Financial Services Corporation                |  | Maryland                                    |  |                     | 100 | %





|(1) | The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 1 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 2 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 3 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 4 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 5 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 6 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 7 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 8 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 9 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 10 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 11 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 12 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 13 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 14 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 15 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 16 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 17 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 18 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 19 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 20 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 21 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 22 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 23 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 24 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 25 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 26 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 27 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-01078-EAS-MRA Doc #: 86 Filed: 03/29/13 Page: 28 of 28  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T18:18:54-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
G- G. MANN

A-.vlCIIL OFFICE OF THE AITORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN 

### 238Banorablo 5. S. Murohlrron, me 8

rw3ommendatlonr **66 to**  the medloal and nrrgliwtl treatment. 32~0 State Department shell adopt a rsa8onablr fee sohedule ror suoh l xaminatlon&i, Suah fees shall be paid **out oi**  **the** funds approprltited to the State Depart5Qnt SOP the pUrpQEW4 Of ~3el8- tanoa to mody blind poraonrr under the provl8loM of this Aat OP for admlni6trativo exp~nmb,~

“In oarzying **out** the provi8lons or thla motion o? the law, It will be naoeruery for the State Department oi Publio Welfare to obtain the asrvloes of an ophthalmologist for oonrultatlre servlae to the Dqmrtmnt. The ophthalmolo&l6t 8elaoted la on the ra$ular payroll of the 

### StateSohool for the Blind during nine menth6 or raoh year-dkptambar thPou&hby. The Stats Dapartmmt oi Publie Welffire wlahso 

### to obtain the 6wvlaea OS thlr ophthalmolo $I ~;fz&ic aotual oam by oas8 ba81#, said ophtaallPol.cw glat to rubalt a monthly bill for ssrvloaa rsndersd 

### on a ease 

### bash durlng~tha 

### nine month period in whloh he i8 on the payroll of the Btata Bohool for the Ellnd.” Seotion 3% of Artlole 1.6 of the Eonstltutl~on of

**‘ hxar**  **pl%V@DtfI oofqmneatlbn**  **of** holding two State poeltionr, an fo **“ 9**  agent, oifloer or agpolntee lant The aooounting offloe~r or thlcl State 6hal.l neither draw nor pay a warrant upon the !htasu~y 

### In favor of any person, for aabry or oompematlo~ aa agent, offloer or appelnteo, who holds at the mum tlm8 any other offloe or gosit ion of honor trust or profit, under thie State or the United States, sxoept aa prescribed in this Coa&Atutlon.

. . .” The ophthtilmologiat you daooribe will not oome within the certain sxaeptlona elaawhsre preaoribsd in the Conrtltution.
In an eye, aar, opinion No, 04607 this department **ruled** that

nose and throat rpeelallnt caiplopod part time in

### one State lfi8tltutlon and aooeptlng

and holding

a l 

### liallar plaoein anotherStateimttltution 

### at the same time **oould IlQt**  r~osl~e 

### otmpensation tor eitherpo8ltion duringthe tl.=e both positions

are held. A 

### oopg of thie opiaion 

### lr enolosed*

We 

### bellarethat the ophthalmologist oannot aOC3ept and l.o rve

and reosivepaySrem 

### the dtate o? TW~B la en

### otheroapaoltyin behaltof the Daparlment of PablloWelfares 

### and the 

### taot that 

### he may be paid on a ease by me0 baa18 by the Department of Pub110 Walfara will not raw our oplnlon,

APPROVEDAUG 21, 1941
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AlphaSmart, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2004, I, James W. Walker, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary of AlphaSmart, Inc.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
AlphaSmart, Inc. for the periods presented therein.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                                               
|------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ James M. Walker                                           
|                   |  |     |  | James M. Walker                                               
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Before the First Division,

July 23, 1940

No. 44129.

#### Petition 5987-R of Marrash Importing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

From the weight of the evidence it was found that there was no intent to deceive or defraud the Government. The petition was therefore granted.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Chmiel, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 565]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, People v Saunders,*190 AD2d 1092, 1093, *lv denied*81 NY2d 1019). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J.—Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United America Indemnity, Ltd.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this Quarterly Report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this Quarterly Report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this Quarterly Report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Saul A. Fox

Saul A. FoxChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Min Sok Randy Park, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables
Trust 2010-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers
have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and



5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 28, 2013



| | By: | /s/ Min Sok Randy Park                                       
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Min Sok Randy Park                                     
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization
of the depositor)
Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


     The  undersigned,  a member  of the  Board of  Managers  or an  officer  of
MIDAMERICAN  FUNDING,  LLC, an Iowa limited  liability  company (the "Company"),
hereby  constitutes  and appoints  Douglas L.  Anderson and Paul J. Leighton and
each of them, as his/her true and lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent, with full
power of substitution and  resubstitution,  for and in his/her stead, in any and
all capacities,  to sign on his/her behalf the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report
for the fiscal year  ending  December  31,  2001 and to execute  any  amendments
thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents
in  connection  therewith,  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  and
applicable stock exchanges,  with the full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing  necessary or advisable to all intents and purposes
as he/she might or could do in person,  hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said  attorney-in-fact  and agent,  or his/her  substitute or  substitutes,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Executed as of March 26, 2002.

/s/ David L. Sokol                                     /s/ Gregory E. Abel
----------------------                                 --------------------
DAVID L. SOKOL                                         GREGORY E. ABEL


/s/ Patrick J. Goodman                                 /s/ Delbert D. Weber
----------------------                                 --------------------
PATRICK J. GOODMAN                                     DELBERT D. WEBER
#### Frederick Homeyer, *Respondent, v.*Moses May, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by Dykman, J.
### Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under EO

12866 and EO 13563 Interagency Review. Subject to Further Policy Review.

Interagency Comments on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) draft proposed rule titled, “ Renewable Fuel Standard Program: Standards for 2014, 2015, and 2016 and Biomass

- Based Diesel Volume for 2017 , ” RIN 2060

- AS22

Q 21. The Caribbean and Central American nations that participate in Caribbean basin Initiative and CAFTA include Costa Rica, El Salvador, Jamaica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Trinidad and Tobago. I pulled the data from >http://www.eia.gov/dnav/p et/pet_move_impcus_a2_nus_epooxe_im0_mbbl_a.htm<

.

Response: Discussion in the preamble about historical imports of sugarcane ethanol has been modified to include imports from CAFTA in addition to imports directly from Brazil and from CBI countries.Q 25. The AEO2015 Table 42 is selected from >http ://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/tables_ref.cfm<

. I

pulled the Excel and highlighted in yellow the relevant data for the calculation.

EPA Response: The calculation of the VMT fraction of the entire fleet that is from FFVs must include the VMT from FFVs in the denominator, as follows:

VMT from FFVs
VMT from FFVs + VMT from non FFVs

Moreover, the only vehicles at issue are those that are either gasoline

- powered or repla c e gasoline

- powered vehicles. Since all purely alternative vehicles could arguably have replaced a gasoline vehicle, we have assumed that the only vehicles that should be excluded from this calculation are those that are diesel

- powered. The resulting calculation is as follows:218

. 7
2
, 775

. 0

− 25

. 9 = 7

. 95 %

Interagency Follow

- up (5/27): EPA’s approach to Q25 is slightly different from what we would do. The differences in all three calculations are minor and round to 8%, but the best denominator for this calculation is:

VMT Gasoline ICE + VMT Ethanol

- Flex Fuel ICE + Electric

- Gasoline Hybrid = 2462.8+218.7+49 = 2730.5

So, the fraction of miles traveled by Ethanol

- Flex Fuel ICE is 218.7 / 2730.5 = 8.01%
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 4, 2019

a1001

Order 

Clerk

October 4, 2019

158392

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158392

COA: 343891

Wayne CC: 07-020825-FC

KAINTE DESHAWN HICKEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of May 22, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the 

application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals. On order 

of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again 

considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to 

People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 (1973), to determine whether the defendant was: (1) 

denied the effective assistance of trial counsel due to trial counsel’s alleged failure to call 

the alibi witnesses now identified by the defendant, and (2) denied the effective 

assistance of appellate counsel on direct appeal due to that attorney’s failure to raise the 

alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

We do not retain jurisdiction.