alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 2:10-cv-01173-EAS-MRA Doc #: 26 Filed: 11/08/11 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T14:35:00-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Peyton R. Patterson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer hereby certify that NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.s report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|/s/ Peyton R. Patterson             
|Peyton R. Patterson                 
|Chairman of the Board, President and
|Chief Executive Officer             



Date: November 12, 2004



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TIME_ FILED

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ------------­

EASTERN DIVISION FEB 2 6 2010 

JAMES BONINI, Clerk SULINA MOLER. COLUMBUS, OHIO 

Plaintiff. 

vs. Civil Action 2:10-CV-llS 

Judge Frost 

Magistrate Judge King 

ATTORNEY GENERALS VICTIMS 

OF CRIME, 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

On February 10, 2010, the United States Magistrate Judge 

issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the complaint be 

dismissed pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §1915 (e) for lack of subj ect matter 

jurisdiction. Doc. NO.2. This matter is before the Court on 

plaintiff's objection to that Report and Recommendation, which the Court 

will consider de novo. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b)i F.R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

This Court has reviewed the record and agrees that the 

complaint does not present a claim over which this Court has 

jurisdiction. Plaintiff's objections, Doc. No.5, do not offer any 

persuasive evidence or argument to the contrary. 

plaintiff also asks, in the alternative, for leave to amend 

the complaint. However, the claims apparently sought to be asserted by 

plaintiff, i.e., ~conspiracy, defamation and character to the business 

and family name," Doc. No.5, p.l, do not state a claim arising under 

federal law. See Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 (1976) (injury to reputation 

is not a liberty interest protected by the United States Constitution.) 

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the 

complaint is DENIED. Plaintiff's objections to the Report and 

Case: 2:10-cv-00115-GLF-NMK Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/26/10 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Recommendation are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED 

and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. The Clerk shall enter 

FINAL JUDGMENT. Moreover I the Court concludes that appeal from the

judgment entered in this action should not be taken in good faith. See 

28 U.S.C. §1915(a). 

Gregory L. Frost 


United states District Judge 


2 

Case: 2:10-cv-00115-GLF-NMK Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/26/10 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of G2 Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Yuan Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Yuan Huang         
|Yuan Huang             
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 15, 2010      

A signed original of this
certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Education, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Bureau of Indian Education is announcing that the Advisory Board for Exceptional Children will hold its next meeting in Miami, FL. The purpose of the meeting is to meet the mandates of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEIA) on Indian children with disabilities. 

# DATES:

                        The Board will meet on Sunday, April 29, 2007, from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m.; Monday, April 30, 2007, from 8 a.m. to                               ( print page 15904)                            5 p.m.; and Tuesday, May 1, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Local Time.                     

# ADDRESSES:

The meetings will be held at the Miccosukee Indian School, U.S. HWY 41 Mile Marker 70, P.O. Box 440021, Tamiami Station, Miami, FL 33144. 

Written statements may be submitted to Mr. Thomas M. Dowd, Director, Bureau of Indian Education, 1849 C Street, NW., Mail Stop 3609-MIB, Washington, DC 20240; Telephone (202) 208-6123; Fax (202) 208-3312. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Sherry Allison, Designated Federal Official, Bureau of Indian Education, Albuquerque Service Center, Division of Performance and Accountability, P.O. Box 1088, Suite 332, Albuquerque, NM 87103; Telephone (505) 563-5277. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Advisory Board was established to advise the Secretary of the Interior, through the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, on the needs of Indian children with disabilities, as mandated by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-446). 

*The following items will be on the agenda:*
    - Special Education Director's Report.
    - Status of Annual Performance Report.
    - Dispute Resolution Activities.
    - Albuquerque Service Center Update.

The meetings are open to the public. 

Dated: March 20, 2007. 

Michael D. Olsen, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs.

 [FR Doc. E7-6134 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-6W-P
(Reap. Dec. 9276)

#### Liberty Brush Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 844249.

(Decided December 22, 1958)

*Cobb & Weissbrodt*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have stipulated and agreed in this case as follows:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by counsel for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise involved in the subject appeal consists of paint brushes exported from England.

> That at the time of exportation thereof, such or similar paint brushes were not being freely offered for sale for home consumption in England, or for export to the United States, or for sale in the principal markets of the United States, in accordance with the provisions of Section 402 (e), (d), and (e), of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

> That at the time of exportation thereof, the “cost of production” of such paint brushes, as defined in Section 402 (f) of the aforesaid Act, is as shown in Schedule “A”, hereto attached and made a part hereof.

On the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 to be the proper basis of valuation for the merchandise involved, and that such cost of production in each instance is as set forth in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made a part of this decision.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

*426Schedule “A”

Reappraisement No. 282801-A

Shillings, British currency

(2) Reappraisement No. Merchandise Paintbrushes (1) Materials and fabrica- General tion expenses (4) Packing (5) Total cost per doz. brushes t* >; Ph

282801-A 3" No. 1306 67. 73 6. 77 85. 87 0$ co to ^ ÜT

2" No. 1306 35. 54 3. 55 44. 90 J-* co o CO 1-4 co

2" No. 1306 Long Handles 37. 54 3. 75 2. 30 4. 13 47. 72

4" x *%"*x *3%,”*7801C. 91. 69 9. 17 5. 78 10. 08 116. 72

3" D. V. 3A-1306 62. 62 6.26 3. 90 6. 89 79. 67

2" D. V. 3A-1305 32. 31 3. 23 2. 13 3. 55 41. 22

2K" D. V. 3A-1305 40. 85 4. 08 2. 44 4. 49 51. 86

IK" D. V. 3A-1305 21. 62 2. 16 2. 15 2. 38 28. 31

*2"*S/Oval Cel. 52. 11 5. 21 2. 23 5. 73 65. 28

2K" P/Sash Nob. 57. 07 5. 71 2. 61 6. 28 71. 67

3K" x *%”*x 4.Ka"-4316/C/6. 120. 10 12. 01 13. 21 150. 66 ^ co

3" x 433/16" 4316/C 109. 60 10. 96 12. 06 136. 69 1> o

3" x 1" x 4.Ko" 4316/C/2 113. 93 11. 39 4. 16 12. 53 142. 01

4" x K" x 4.Kg" 4316/C/3 117. 71 11. 77 5. 87 12. 95 148.' 30

2H" D. V. 3B-1300 51. 83 5. 18 2. 65 5. 70 65. 36

3" D. V. 3B-1300 72. 30 7. 23 4. 16 7. 95 . 91.64

2" D. V. 3B-1300 43. 43 4. 34 2. 30 4. 78 54: 85

IK" D. V. 3B-1300 29. 10 2. 91 1. 71 3. 20 36. 92

3" D. V. 2B-1205 32. 59 3. 26 3. 27 3. 58 42. 70

6/0 F. Oval 64. 77 6. 48 2. 51 7. 12 80. 88

10/0 .x 3.%" F. Oval 113. 75 11. 37 3. 51 12. 51 141. 14

IK" D. V. 2C-1210 14. 09 1.41 1. 41 1. 55 18. 46

1" D. V. 2C-1210 8. 32 . 83 1. 12 . 91 11. 18

2" D. V. 2C-1210 19. 54 1. 95 1. 71 2. 15 25. 35

2" A/Sash Nob. 24. 70 2. 47 2. 05 2. 72 31. 94

.IK" A/Sash Nob. 16. 07 1. 61 1. 67 1. 77' 21. 12

3" x *3.%"*S/Oval 102. 01 10. 20 3. 69 11. 22 127. 12.

3.K" Shasta Cel. 75. 22 7. 52 3. 66 8. 27 94. 67
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

 

No. 06-2176

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JUAN C. RODRIGUEZ-FERREIRA,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on June 30, 2008, is corrected as follows:

On page 8, line 23, change "July 3, 2003" to "July 2, 2003"
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5876]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 
(<greek-i>25150).
    Date/Time: May 3, 2007, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.; May 4, 2007, 10 a.m. 
to 2 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
1235, Arlington, VA. The Advisory Committee members will attend 
virtually.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Deborah White-Wilkins, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-
8970.
    If you are attending the meeting and need access to the NSF, 
please contact the individual listed above so you name may be added 
to the building access list.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice concerning issues related 
to the oversight, integrity, development and enhancement of NSF's 
Office of Cyberinfrastructure.
    Agenda:

May 3, 2007:
    AM: Introductions and Updates--Office of Cyberinfrastructure 
activities.
    PM: Presentation and Discussion--ACCI Subcommittee meetings and 
meeting with the Director and Deputy Director, NSF.

May 4, 2007:
    AM: Presentation and Discussion--Office of Cyberinfrastructure.
    PM: Discussion--Planning for next meeting; feedback; other 
business.

    Dated: March 27, 2007.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-5876 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Gryphon Gold Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Allen S. Gordon, President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:   February 10, 2006

| | By:  /s/ Allen S. Gordon
       Allen S. Gordon
       President
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------

---
No. 42981.

#### Protest 986449-G of Leonard W. Moritz Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8753 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2024 

Received 

AN ACT 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate single, unique ZIP Codes for certain communities, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 8753 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODES FOR CERTAIN 

2 COMMUNITIES. 

3 Not later than 270 days after the date of the enact4 ment of this Act, the United States Postal Service shall 

5 designate a single, unique ZIP Code for each of the fol6 lowing communities: 

7 (1) Eastvale, California. 

8 (2) North Tustin, California. 

9 (3) Castle Pines, Colorado. 

10 (4) Centennial, Colorado. 

11 (5) Cherry Hills, Colorado. 

12 (6) Greenwood Village, Colorado. 

13 (7) Highlands Ranch, Colorado. 

14 (8) Lone Tree, Colorado. 

15 (9) Severance, Colorado 

16 (10) Silver Cliff, Colorado. 

17 (11) Sterling Ranch, Colorado. 

18 (12) Superior, Colorado. 

19 (13) Scotland, Connecticut. 

20 (14) Estero, Florida. 

21 (15) Ft. Myers, Florida. 

22 (16) Hollywood, Florida. 

23 (17) Miami Lakes, Florida. 

24 (18) Ocoee, Florida. 

25 (19) Oakland Park, Florida. 

26 (20) Lighthouse Point, Florida. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

HR 8753 RDS

1 (21) Coconut Creek, Florida. 

2 (22) Parkland, Florida. 

3 (23) Deerfield Beach, Florida. 

4 (24) Wilton Manors, Florida. 

5 (25) Burr Ridge, Illinois. 

6 (26) Urbandale, Iowa. 

7 (27) Carmel, Indiana. 

8 (28) Noblesville, Indiana. 

9 (29) Westfield, Indiana. 

10 (30) Zionsville, Indiana. 

11 (31) Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 

12 Louisiana. 

13 (32) Montz, Louisiana. 

14 (33) Grass Valley, Nevada. 

15 (34) Swanzey, New Hampshire. 

16 (35) Kinnelon, New Jersey. 

17 (36) Flanders, New York. 

18 (37) Glendale, New York. 

19 (38) Riverside, New York. 

20 (39) Pendelton, New York 

21 (40) Northampton, New York. 

22 (41) Goose Creek, South Carolina. 

23 (42) Fairview, Texas. 

24 (43) Murphy, Texas. 

25 (44) Sargent, Texas. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
4 

HR 8753 RDS

1 (45) Fairlawn, Virginia. 

2 (46) Caledonia, Wisconsin. 

3 (47) Franklin, Wisconsin. 

4 (48) Greenfield, Wisconsin 

5 (49) Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin. 

6 (50) Somers, Wisconsin. 

7 (51) Mills, Wyoming. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1 

### Gurdoglanyan, Nicole

From: Johnny Cope [johnny.cope@bluespace.com]

Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 3:25 PM

To: GovernmentAffairs

Subject: Re: Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029

Dear Secretary LaHood:

I am writing today to express my strong support for JetBlue’s application to offer new

beyond

‐ perimeter service at Reagan National and link the nation’s capital to another

important capital city: Austin, Texas.

JetBlue’s application will provide much

‐ needed low

‐ fare, high

‐ quality service from the

capital’s downtown airport to the capital of the largest of the contiguous 48 states. Those

in Austin are crying out for new JetBlue service to DCA, being one of the ten largest markets

without nonstop air service to the airport. Their application will bring tremendous public

benefit and much

‐ needed low

‐ fare competition to DCA.

Please join me in offering your support for JetBlue’s application.

Johnny Cope, Vice President

BlueSpace Software Corp

Austin, Texas
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6219]



[[Page 16364]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center Web site at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 30, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Tracy Basinger, Director, 
Regional and Community Bank Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. Saddleback Bancorp, Tustin, California; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Tustin 
Community Bank, Tustin, California.
    In connection with this application, Applicant also has applied 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Saddleback Loan Company, 
Tustin, California, and thereby engage in extending credit and 
servicing loans, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 30, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-6219 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8972 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8972

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
update certain regulations to allow for expanded use of lap held child 
           restraints during flights, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2024

  Mr. Posey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
update certain regulations to allow for expanded use of lap held child 
           restraints during flights, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safety for Our Babies Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. LAP HELD CHILD RESTRAINTS.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall update 
sections 91.107, 121.311, 125.211, and 135.128 of title 14, Code of 
Federal Regulations, and any such other related regulations as the 
Administrator determines appropriate, to remove any prohibition, 
restriction, or condition on an adult accompanying a child under the 
age of 2 on an aircraft choosing to secure such child in a lap held 
child restraint approved and provided by such adult during movement on 
the surface, takeoff, or landing.
                                 <all>
```