alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JAMES MURRAY, DOC #T16031, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4048 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed August 7, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge James Murray, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, BADALAMENTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 4

- 00 009

- C V



### ____________________

HENRY STEPP III

, Appellant

V.

JEFF STEPP , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 13

- 10

- 10769 CV

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Henry Stepp III filed a notice of appeal on January 7, 2014, seeking to

appeal an order denying an application for protective order. With respect to

Henry’s appeal, the record, due to be filed on February 6, 2014, was not filed. W e

notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecut ion

unless arrangements were made to fil e the record or Henry explained why

additional time was needed to file the record. Henry did no t respond to the Court’s

notice

. On March 20, 2014, we warned Henry that the appeal would be dismissed2 unless on or befor e March 31, 2014, he arranged to pay for the record, filed an

affidavit of indigence, or showed that he could not be charged a fee for the

appellate record. Henry did not respond to the Court’s notice by the date specified

in the clerk’s notice.

Henry fail ed to comply with a notice from the clerk that required a response

or other action within a specific time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). T he appeal is

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

A PPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Opinion Delivered April 10, 2014

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
#### United States *v.*Stone & Downer Co.

No. 6342.

Entry No. L-9.

Invoice dated Montreal, Canada, June 25, 1945.

Certified June 28, 1945.

Entered at Lawrence, Mass., July 10, 1945.

(Decided September 9, 1946)

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

*Joseph F. Lockett*for the defendant.

Olivee, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the 25 fishing reels No. 300 at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, is $4.30 Canadian funds, packed, tax included, per reel, and that there was no higher export value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> It is further agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On bhe agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by bhe Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the 25 fishing reels No. 300, and that such value is $4.30 Canadian funds, packed, tax included, per reel. Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Peterson, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated:  August 11, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Robert  A. Peterson              |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Robert A.  Peterson                  |
|                         |   | Chief  Executive Officer and Manager |
|                         |   | (Chief Executive Officer)            |

 

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
Before the Second Division,

December 26, 1940

No. 45073.

#### Protest 726941-G of National Silver Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the candlesticks are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. *Dow*v. *United States*(21 C. C. P. A. 282, T. D. 46816) and Abstract 26440 followed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8475 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on the 

correlation between service in the Armed Forces conducting explosive 

ordnance disposal and post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain 

injury, and suicide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2024 

Mr. CRAWFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress 

a report on the correlation between service in the Armed 

Forces conducting explosive ordnance disposal and posttraumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, and 

suicide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Explosive Ordnance Disposal Brain Health and Suicide 

6 Report Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8475 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON CORRELATION BETWEEN MILITARY 

2 SERVICE IN EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DIS3 POSAL AND POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DIS4 ORDER, TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY, AND SUI5 CIDE. 

6 (a) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 180 

7 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec8 retary of Defense shall provide a report to Congress on 

9 the effects of PTSD, TBI, and death by suicide, specific 

10 to EOD personnel that includes— 

11 (1) a review of suicide data specific to EOD 

12 personnel from the Department’s Suicide Prevention 

13 Office for the last 5 years; 

14 (2) an assessment of any trends in PTSD and/ 

15 or TBI in death by suicide in the EOD community; 

16 (3) recommendations for policies or initiatives 

17 that could improve health care for EOD personnel 

18 with specific regard to PTSD, TBI, and prevention 

19 of suicide; 

20 (4) ongoing efforts by the Department to pro21 vide support for EOD personnel; and 

22 (5) a detailed list of any additional resources 

23 that Congress could provide to support EOD per24 sonnel in an effort to reduce the frequency and the 

25 effects of PTSD, TBI, and death by suicide. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8475 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The requirement to submit 

2 reports under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date 

3 that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

4 Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.7




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of Extorre Gold Mines Limited (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Trevor Mulroney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  June 22, 2012
/s/ Trevor MulroneyTrevor Mulroney

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 1 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 2 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 3 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 4 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 5 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 6 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 7 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 8 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 9 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 10 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00169-EAS-NMK Doc #: 42 Filed: 05/03/12 Page: 11 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T21:50:07-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0714

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WOLFGANG ALEXANDER LUCAS VASQUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 22, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 15 2020

06/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0714
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00 162 -CV Te xa s D e par tm e ntof P ublic Safe ty , A ppe lla nt

v. Bryan H. Reynold s , Appellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-06- 0039 25 , HO NORAB LE GISELA D. TRIANA , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N P ER CURIAM

The Te x as De partment of Public Saf ety has filed a docume nt entitled “Appellant’ s Unopposed Notice of Withdrawal of N otice of I nterlocutory

Appea l.” I n the document, the Depa rtment states that it is withdrawing its notice of interlocutory appea l. The De partment fur ther state s that it ha s con fe rr e d with a pp e lle e ’s atto rn e y

of re c or d r e g ard ingthi s matte r, and a pp e lle e is un op po se d to the wi thd

ra wa l of the no tic e of

a pp e a l in th is case . Ac c or din g ly , w e dis mis s th is appea l. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Jul y

8, 2008
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of PinstripesNY, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford Teller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Clifford Teller

Clifford Teller

Principal Executive Officer

June 28, 2011
Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 1 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 2 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 3 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 4 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 5 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 6 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 7 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 8 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 9 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 10 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 11 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 12 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 13 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 14 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 15 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 16 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 17 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 18 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 19 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 20 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 21 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 22 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 23 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 24 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00016-EAS-NMK Doc #: 79 Filed: 09/25/12 Page: 25 of 25  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T14:34:45-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-50910

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ISRAEL SANCHEZ-ENSALDO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-1074-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Israel Sanchez-Ensaldo appeals his 18-month sentence following his 

conviction for importation of and possession with intent to distribute 

marijuana. He argues that the district court erred in denying a U.S.S.G. 

§ 3B1.2 reduction for his minor role in the offense. Sanchez-Ensaldo contends 

that he was entitled to the reduction because he acted merely as a courier. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 17, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-50910 Document: 00512806830 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/17/2014
No. 13-50910

The district court’s refusal to grant Sanchez-Ensaldo a two-level 

reduction for being a minor participant was not clearly erroneous. See United 

States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203 n.9 (5th Cir. 2005). Sanchez-Ensaldo’s 

courier status did not entitle him to a role adjustment because a defendant 

may be a courier without being “substantially less culpable than the average 

participant.” See United States v. Brown, 54 F.3d 234, 241 (5th Cir. 1995); 

United States v. Nevarez-Arreola, 885 F.2d 243, 245 (5th Cir. 1989). SanchezEnsaldo’s attempt to import a gross weight of 66.92 kilograms of marijuana 

provided an indispensable service to the drug-trafficking offense and was 

essential to its success. See Brown, 54 F.3d at 241; see also United States v. 

Buenrostro, 868 F.2d 135, 138 (5th Cir. 1989). Moreover, Sanchez-Ensaldo was 

to be paid a large sum of money for his role in the activity and was solely 

responsible for transporting the marijuana to its final destination in 

Albuquerque, New Mexico. Based on the foregoing, it cannot be said that 

Sanchez-Ensaldo was peripheral to the advancement of the criminal activity 

and thus a minor participant. See Villanueva, 408 F.3d at 204.

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-50910 Document: 00512806830 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/17/2014
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Standard Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation;c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 December 23, 2010
    /s/ Timothy K. ZimmermanDate
    Timothy K. ZimmermanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Case: 2:11-cv-00010-PCE-NMK Doc #: 3 Filed: 01/24/11 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T13:24:58-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board of Directors


ExamWorks Group, Inc:




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8  (No. 333-170487 and No. 333-177994) of ExamWorks Group, Inc. of our reports dated February 29, 2012, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of ExamWorks Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011 and related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, which reports appear in the December 31, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of ExamWorks Group, Inc.




Our report dated February 29, 2012 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, contains an explanatory paragraph that states all 2011 acquisitions except National IME Centres Inc. were excluded from management's assessment.  The total assets and revenues of these entities represented approximately 18% and 47%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.







/s/ KPMG LLP





Atlanta, Georgia


February 29, 2012
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131077 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131077 

 COA: 268857 

Washtenaw CC: 04-002124-FH 

WILLIAM WALTER MULHERN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0821 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 29, 2006 

 Clerk
#### The People *v.*The Pres’t, etc., D. & H. C. Co.

No papers.

Motion to put on calendar granted.

See 27 N. Y. State Rep., 624.