alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 2:10-cv-00965-EAS-TPK Doc #: 11 Filed: 04/01/11 Page: 1 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00965-EAS-TPK Doc #: 11 Filed: 04/01/11 Page: 2 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00965-EAS-TPK Doc #: 11 Filed: 04/01/11 Page: 3 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00965-EAS-TPK Doc #: 11 Filed: 04/01/11 Page: 4 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00965-EAS-TPK Doc #: 11 Filed: 04/01/11 Page: 5 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00965-EAS-TPK Doc #: 11 Filed: 04/01/11 Page: 6 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00965-EAS-TPK Doc #: 11 Filed: 04/01/11 Page: 7 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00965-EAS-TPK Doc #: 11 Filed: 04/01/11 Page: 8 of 8  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T15:54:24-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 52711.

protest 104529-K (New York).

#### Klingerit, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on entry 68963. The protest was sustained to this extent.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9016 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for enhanced punishments 

for offenders who commit sexual abuse while unlawfully present in the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2024 

Mr. OGLES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for enhanced punishments for offenders who commit sexual 

abuse while unlawfully present in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for American 

5 Women and Children Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED SENTENCE FOR RAPE BY A PERSON UN7 LAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES. 

8 (a) AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ABUSE.—Section 2241 of 

9 title 18, United States Code, is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9016 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter following 

2 paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘, except as otherwise 

3 provided in this section,’’ before ‘‘be fined under this 

4 title’’; 

5 (2) in subsection (b), in the matter following 

6 paragraph (2)(B), by inserting ‘‘, except as other7 wise provided in this section,’’ before ‘‘be fined 

8 under this title’’; 

9 (3) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘, except as 

10 otherwise provided in this section,’’ before ‘‘be fined 

11 under this title’’; and 

12 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(e) UNLAWFULLY PRESENT OFFENDERS.—Who14 ever commits an offense under this section while present 

15 in the United States without lawful status under the immi16 gration laws (as such term is defined in section 101 of 

17 the Immigration and Nationality Act) may be sentenced 

18 to death.’’. 

19 (b) AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ABUSE.—Section 2242 of 

20 title 18, United States Code, is amended, in the matter 

21 following paragraph (3)— 

22 (1) by inserting ‘‘, except as otherwise provided 

23 in this section,’’ before ‘‘be fined under this title’’; 

24 and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9016 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Who2 ever commits an offense under this section while un3 lawfully present in the United States/NOTE: present 

4 in the United States without lawful status under the 

5 immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 

6 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act) may be 

7 sentenced to death.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 58144.

protests 171782-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Acrow, Incorporated, and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*516Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of building shores the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 57727, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act oF 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 of Advanced
Cellular, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 8, 2011


/s/ Nir Eliyahu
------------------------------------
Nir Eliyahu, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41241

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS JESUS BARRIENTOS-VASQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-01-CR-195-1

--------------------

August 21, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Jesus Barrientos-Vasquez appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence for possessing with the intent to

distribute approximately 49 kilograms of marijuana. Barrientos

contends that 21 U.S.C. § 841 is facially unconstitutional in

light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

As Barrientos concedes, his argument is foreclosed by this

court’s decision in United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582
No. 01-41241

-2-

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied., 532 U.S. 1045 (2001). He raises

the issue only to preserve it for Supreme Court review. The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 54773.

#### August Hummel and Stevens Nelson Paper Corp. v. United States,

protests 131314-K and 146459-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 65591.

#### The Huffman Manufacturing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/13153, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

FRANK C. BROWN, JR.,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. C2-10-967

WARDEN DEB TIMMERMAN- JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

COOPER, et al, MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE P. KEMP

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or

trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed July 16, 2012, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: July 16, 2012 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:10-cv-00967-EAS-TPK Doc #: 84 Filed: 07/16/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) to the quarterly report of G2 Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2009 (the Report), I, Gust Kepler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Gust Kepler        
|Gust Kepler            
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 7, 2009         

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40441 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CRISTOBAL SARCENO

- SARCENO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 1892

- 1

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and GRAVES , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Cristobal Sarceno

- Sarceno (Sarceno) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation , in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Relevant to this appeal,
the district court assessed a 12

- level “drug trafficking offense” enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(B) based on Sarc eno’s 2008 New York conviction for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 13, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40441 Document: 00513152928 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2015No. 14

- 40441

2 For the first time on appeal, Sarceno contends that the district court plainly erred in imposing th e 12

- level enhancement because the New York offense of con viction may be violated by the giving away or sharing of drugs with no remuneration. He argues that the term “drug trafficking offense” in § 2L1.2 requires remuneration.
While the instant appeal was pending, this court rejected the argument that an offe nse must require remuneration to qualify as a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1.2. U nited States v. Martinez

- Lugo , 782 F.3d 198, 201

- 05 (5th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 14-40441 Document: 00513152928 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/13/2015
_______________________________________ __ ___________________ ________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
August 26, 2008

136906

WAYNE LAFOUNTAIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee. Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices

SC: 136906 CoA: 285464

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the partial filing fee as required by the order of July 18, 2008, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this file.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
August 26, 2008
Clerk
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Terrance Norvell, Jr., Appellant

No. 06-21-00051-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 188th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 51694-

A). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Stevens and 

Justice van Cleef participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Terrance Norvell, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 13, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James F. Groelinger, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: November 30, 2012 | /s/ James F. Groelinger      
|------------------------ | -----------------------------
|                         | By:  James F. Groelinger     
|                         | Its:  Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. and will be retained by Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of G2 Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the six month period ending
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2010 (the Report), I, Gust Kepler, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Gust Kepler            
|Gust Kepler                
|Principal Financial Officer
|July 26, 2010              

A signed original of this certification
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00219

v. Judge George C. Smith

Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

FIFTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED

FORTY AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($15,840.00)

IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the November 15, 2011 Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 22.) The Magistrate Judge recommended

that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Strike Answer of Matthew Hughes. 

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties

that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a “waiver

of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment

of the District Court.” (Report & Recommendation 3, ECF No. 22.) The time period for filing

objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. No party has objected to the Report

and Recommendation. 

The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 

Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired,

the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,

Case: 2:11-cv-00219-GCS-EPD Doc #: 23 Filed: 12/19/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike is GRANTED. (ECF No. 21.) Mr. Hughes’ Answer is hereby

STRICKEN from the record. (ECF No. 9.)

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

Case: 2:11-cv-00219-GCS-EPD Doc #: 23 Filed: 12/19/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15911-15912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Workforce Investment Act; Native American Employment and Training 
Council

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and Section 166(h)(4) of the 
Workforce Investment Act (WIA) [29 U.S.C. 2911(h)(4)], notice is hereby 
given of the next meeting of the Native American Employment and 
Training Council (NAETC), as constituted under WIA.
    Time and Date: The meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. Eastern 
Daylight Savings Time (DST) on Wednesday, April 18, 2007, and continue 
until 5 p.m. that day. The meeting will reconvene at 10:30 a.m. (DST) 
on Thursday, April 19, 2007, and adjourn at approximately 4:30 p.m. on 
that day. The period from 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on April 19, 2007, 
will be reserved for participation and presentations by members of the 
public.
    Place: All sessions will be held at the Hyatt Regency Newport, 
Vanderbilt Room, 1 Goat Island, Newport, Rhode Island 02840.
    Status: The meeting will be open to the public. Persons who need 
special accommodations should contact the Designated Federal Official 
(DFO), Mr. Craig Lewis, at (202) 693-3384 by April 12, 2007.
    Matters To Be Considered: The formal agenda will focus on the 
following topics: (1) The Employment and Training Administration's 
Workforce

[[Page 15912]]

Innovation in Regional Economic Development initiative and other 
relevant issues; (2) Indian and Native American Program Update; (3) 
Workgroup Structures and Activities; (4) Fiscal Year 08 Funding; and 
(5) Council Recommendations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Craig Lewis, DFO, Indian and 
Native American Programs, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Room S-4206, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210. Telephone: (202) 693-3384 (VOICE) (this is not a 
toll-free number).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of March 2007.
Emily Stover DeRocco,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-6222 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EX. 4.30 Amendment - Gill






AMENDING AGREEMENT NO. 2
THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT made effective as of the 12th day of March, 2015.
BETWEEN:
ONCOYLYTICS BIOTECH (U.S.), INC.,
("OBUS")
- and -
GEORGE M. GILL, M.D.
(the "Employee")
WHEREAS the Employee is an officer of OBUS whose terms of employment are set forth in the Executive Employment Agreement ("Employment Agreement") dated effective January 1, 2011;
AND WHEREAS OBUS and the Employee wish to amend the Employment Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amending Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows:
Section 1 – Amendments


The Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing Section 3(1) with the following:


“Commencing January 1, 2015, OBUS shall pay to the Employee a salary of THREE HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FOURTY-TWO DOLLARS AND TWELVE CENTS ($316,742.12) U.S. DOLLARS per annum, exclusive of bonuses, benefits and other compensation, payable in equal installments of THIRTEEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED NINETY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND FIFTY-NINE CENTS ($13,197.59) U.S. DOLLARS on the 15th and last day of each month.”


   


Section 2 – Effective Date


(1)    This Amending Agreement shall be effective from and after January 1, 2015.


(2)    In all other respects the parties confirm that the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.
	
				
	 
	 
	ONCOLYTICS BIOTECH (U.S.), INC.



	Per:
	/s/ Mary Ann Dillahunty

	 
	 
	 
	Mary Ann Dillahunty
President

	 
	 
	Per:
	/s/ Kirk Look

	 
	 
	 
	Kirk Look
Chief Financial Officer






	
			
	/s/ Margaret Kowalczewski
	 
	

/s/ George M. Gill

	WITNESS
	 
	GEORGE M. GILL, M.D.
Case No. 8,520.

#### LOT OF LEAF TOBACCO.

[The case reported under above title in 2 Ben. 76, is the same as Case No. 15,027.]
No. 54761.

#### Nanking Company *v.*United States,

protest 155340-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.