alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Quanta Capital Holdings Ltd.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report")and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, John S. Brittain, Jr., ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of myknowledge:

|          |                                                                                                                     |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.  | The report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|          |                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.  | The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. |

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ John S.Brittain, Jr.                             JohnS. Brittain, Jr. (Principal FinancialOfficer)

----
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Dina Staheli, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DP & D, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)   
	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
	employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  August 1, 2005



/s/ Dina Staheli

President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

RONALD BLOODWORTH,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action 2:10-CV-1121 

 Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge King

WARDEN DEBORA A. TIMMERMAN-COOPER,

et al.,

Defendant.

ORDER

On July 18, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended

that plaintiff’s motions for interim injunctive relief, Doc. Nos. 2, 13,

be denied. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 59. Although the parties

were advised of their right to object and of the consequences of their

failure to do so, there has been no objection.

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 59, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

Plaintiff’s motions for interim injunctive relief, Doc. Nos. 2, 13, are

DENIED.

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:10-cv-01121-ALM-NMK Doc #: 61 Filed: 08/17/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17168-17169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Research Cooperative Agreement To Promote the 
Health of People With Intellectual Disabilities, Request for 
Application (RFA) DD07-012

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
SEP:

    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-4 p.m., May 31, 2007 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
RFA DD07-012, ``Research Cooperative Agreement to Promote the

[[Page 17169]]

Health of People with Intellectual Disabilities.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Juliana Cyril, Ph.D., 
Associate Director for Policy and Peer Review, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop D72, Atlanta, 
GA 30333, Telephone 404.639.4639.

    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E7-6444 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

 

I,Howard M. Nathan, certify that:

 

1)              Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Washtenaw Group, Inc.;

 

2)              Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3)              Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) [Intentionally Omitted] for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             [IntentionallyOmitted];

 

c)              evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

d)             disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 12, 2005                 |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                        |
| /s/ Howard M. Nathan                        |   |
| Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
CERTIFICATION OF
          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Rockelle,
Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, I, Gerard Stephan, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Rockelle, Corp. hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Rockelle, Corp.

Dated:  August 12, 2004

Rockelle, Corp.


By: /s/ Gerard Stephan
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 6, 2019

s0904m 

# Order

Clerk September 6, 2019

159739(48)

SC: 159739

In re PEREZ/DUPREE, Minors. COA: 345451

Kent CC Family Division:

17

- 050620

- NA; 17

- 050621

- NA

17

- 050622

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s August 2,

2019 ord er is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,996; TA-W-60,996A; TA-W-60,996B]


Yamaha Music Manufacturing Inc., Thomaston, GA; Yamaha Musical 
Products Inc., Grand Rapids, MI; Yamaha Corporation of America, Grand 
Rapids, MI; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 20, 2007 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Yamaha 
Music Manufacturing Inc., Thomaston, Georgia (TA-W-60,996), Yamaha 
Musical Products Inc., Grand Rapids, Michigan (TA-W-60,996A), and 
Yamaha Corporation of America, Grand Rapids, Michigan (TA-W-60,996B).
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of March, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-6431 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 44128.

#### Protest 975627-G of Waterfront Service Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

The appraiser’s report was moved in evidence and the protest submitted. The appraiser reported that in his opinion the tax should be 4 cents per pound rather than 3 cents as assessed. The old brass condenser tubes in question were therefore held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1634 and the copper content therein was held subject to a tax of 4 cents per pound under section 601 (c) (7), Revenue Act of 1932.
Order filed February 13, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00022

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF A.B., a child

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 070773



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”). Appellant = s brief
was due February 9, 2012. No brief has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with the clerk of this court within 10 days of the date of this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Sherri W. Schugart, certify that:     6. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.;     7. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     8. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;     9. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;           b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and           c. disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     10. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and           b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/ Sherri W. Schugart       Sherri W. Schugart     Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 12, 2005
38
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation of our report, dated April 1, 2013, relatedto our audits of the consolidated statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2012 and the related consolidated statementsof income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period endedDecember 31, 2012, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation and Subsidiary forthe year ended December 31, 2013.

 

 

/s/ Whittlesey & Hadley, P.C.

 

Hartford, Connecticut

March 31, 2014
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Mark S. RobinowMark S. Robinow
Chief Financial OfficerNovember
14, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Marblehead Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Meyers, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Dated: February 9, 2009

/s/ DANIEL MEYERS Daniel Meyers
Chief Executive Officer and President


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The First Marblehead Corporation and will be retained by The First
Marblehead Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
(Reap. Dec. 8502)

#### I. Albert Co. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 777138, etc.

(Decided December 2, 1955)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiffs.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise and the issues in the Appeals io Reappraisement listed in the Schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issues decided in the case of *United States*v. *Nelson Bead Co.,*C. A. D. 590, and that the record in said case be incorporated and *made*a part of the record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated herein, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation. .

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.