alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007170EN.01002602.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/26

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2007 — Gnemmi v Commission

(Case T-199/05) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Reports procedure - Career development review - 2003 Appraisal exercise - Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly devoid of any legal basis)

(2007/C 170/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Laura Gnemmi (Arona, Italy) (represented by: initially G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, and subsequently F. Frabetti alone)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Berscheid and M. Velardo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment, principally, of the 2003 appraisal exercise in relation to the applicant; and, alternatively, of the applicant's career development review for that exercise.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and, for the rest, as manifestly devoid of any legal basis. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and, for the rest, as manifestly devoid of any legal basis.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to bear her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to bear her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 6.8.2005.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Monitronics International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael R. Haislip,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                          | By:    | /s/  Michael R. Haislip               |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Michael  R. Haislip                   |
|                          |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                          |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
| Date:  February 13, 2007 |   |                                  |

 

 

1

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**














**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**









I,
      Neil
      Smit, the President and Chief Executive Officer of CCH II, LLC and CCH II
      Capital Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
      certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission:




·
            fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934; and




·
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









/s/
      Neil Smit


Neil
      Smit


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


May
      12,
      2006
|   | The Bank of New York Mellon |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | The Bank of New York Mellon |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
|--------|------------------------------|

| ·   | With respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), certain reports to investors contained information that was not calculated in accordance with the terms specified in the transaction agreements. |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | With respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii), certain distributions to investors were not allocated and remitted in accordance with distribution priority and other terms set forth in the transaction agreements. |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
(Reap. Dec. 10206)

#### Wilbur-Ellis Company Dunnington & Arnold, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 836530-1/3, etc.

(Decided March 20, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Norman G. Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*'William S. Orrich, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following agreement and stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> Me. Schwabtz : I offer to stipulate with Government counsel that on or about the time of exportation of the consolidated appeals, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for home consumption in the country of exportation.

> Mb. Austeb : Agreed to.

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, that the price at the time of exportation as which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Peru in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was as set forth in Schedule “A’.’, hereto attached and made a part hereof.

The appeals involved herein are such as are enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to the stipulation of submission herein and made a part hereof, except reappraisement appeal Nos. 250877-A and 242279-A which have been previously abandoned (R. 4).

On the agreed facts, I find export'value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for *590the determination of the values of the merchandise here involved and that such value for the merchandise here involved is as set forth in schedule “A” in the stipulation of submission herein.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(a)


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statements of Additional Information and to the use of our reports
(1) dated February 15, 2001 with respect to the statutory-basis financial
statements and schedules of PFL Life Insurance Company, (2) dated February 2,
2001 with respect to the financial statements of certain subaccounts of PFL
Retirement Builder Variable Annuity Account, which are available for investment
by contract owners of the Retirement Income Builder Variable Annuity, (3) dated
February 2, 2001 with respect to the financial statements of certain subaccounts
of PFL Retirement Builder Variable Annuity Account, which are available for
investment by contract owners of the Retirement Income Builder II Variable
Annuity, and (4) dated February 2, 2001 with respect to the financial statements
of certain subaccounts of PFL Retirement Builder Variable Annuity Account, which
are available for investment by contract owners of Portfolio Select Variable
Annuity, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-7509) and related Prospectuses of Retirement Income
Builder Variable Annuity, Retirement Income Builder II Variable Annuity and
Portfolio Select Variable Annuity.


                                       Ernst & Young LLP


Des Moines, Iowa
April 24, 2001
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:11-cr-73(2)

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

ISRAEL ZAMORA-ARREOLA

Defendant.

ORDER

On October 14, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Israel Zamora-Arreola’s

guilty plea to Count One of the Indictment charging him with Conspiracy to Distribute and to Possess

with Intent to Distribute more than 100 grams of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

(b)(1)(B) and § 846.

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District

Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis

in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 10 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:11-cr-00073-GCS Doc #: 59 Filed: 11/03/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS 

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

Conspiracy to Distribute and to Possess with Intent to Distribute more than 100 grams of heroin in

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) and § 846. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:11-cr-00073-GCS Doc #: 59 Filed: 11/03/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
  1.
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NeuStar, Inc. for the quarter ended June
30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    Information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NeuStar,
Inc.
 August 7, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey E. GanekJeffrey E. GanekChief Executive Officer August 7, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey A. BabkaJeffrey A. BabkaChief Financial Officer
AUDITORS CONSENT


 








Exhibit 10(i)


 



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


 



To the Board of Directors of




Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company


 



        We consent to the use in this Post Effective Amendment No. 16 to Registration Statement No. 33-7724 on Form N-4 of our
reports dated February 15, 2001 on the Flex Extra (Qualified) Segment of Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 1 and the Flex Extra (Non-Qualified) Segment of Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 2 and of our
report dated February 8, 2001 on Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the use of statutory accounting practices which differ from accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America) appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Statement
of Additional Information.


 



DELOITTE
& TOUCHE 
LLP


 



Hartford, Connecticut




April 25, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13782-13783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR07-10-000]


Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, L.P.; Notice of Petition for Rate 
Approval

March 19, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 7, 2007, Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, 
L.P. filed a petition for rate approval for NGPA section 311 maximum 
transportation rates for firm and interruptible transportation 
services, pursuant to section 284.123(b)(1)(i)(A) of the Commission's 
regulations.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#13555641505c7d7f7a7d76406663637c616753757661703d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f1b7b4a3b2be9f9d989f94a28481819e8385b197948392df969e87">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

[[Page 13783]]

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time March 28, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5320 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Roscoe H. Mullis, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on form 10-QSB of First National Banc, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have: 

 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November14, 2004
#### DeAngeli, Appellant, *v.*Fitzgerald.

*530Argued January 9, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*Willard G.*Hetsiel, for appellant.

*Albert It.*Subers, with Mm Bean, DeAngelis, *Tredinnieit <£ Giangiulio, for*appellee.

April 23, 1969:

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

This is an appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas sustaining appellee’s preliminary objections to appellant Marianne’s claim for damages for loss of her husband’s consortium.

Maurice deAngeli filed a complaint in trespass seeking to recover damages for (a) loss of wages and medical bills and (b) pain and suffering and (c) repairs to his car arising out of a collision with appellee’s car. Marianne deAngeli, appellant herein, was named as a party plaintiff in her husband’s trespass action in order that she might recover damages for loss of her husband’s consortium. Marianne’s consortium claim was averred to be for less than $10,000.

Appellee filed preliminary objections to appellant’s consortium claim, on the ground that such a claim was not recognized by the law. *Brown v. Glenside Lumber*
      *531
      *and Coal Company,*429 Pa. 601, 240 A. 2d 822; *Neuberg v. Bobowicz,*401 Pa. 146, 162 A. 2d 662. The lower Court dismissed the claim for consortium and ordered that it be expunged from the complaint.

It is clear that the Order of the lower Court which not only sustained appellee’s preliminary objections but dismissed the plaintiff-wife’s consortium claim is a final Order and therefore appealable. *Brandywine A. J. School Authority v. VanCor, Inc.,*426 Pa. 448, 451, 233 A. 2d 240; see, also, *Sullivan v. Philadelphia,*378 Pa. 648, 107 A. 2d 854.

However, the amount of damages claimed by the plaintiff-wife for loss of consortium is less than flO,000 and therefore appellate jurisdiction is in the Superior Court. Act of June 24, 1895, P. L. 212, §7(c), as amended, August 14, 1963, P. L. 819, §1, 17 P.S. §184 (Supp.) 1963. *Morris v. Board of Property*Assessment, 417 Pa. 192, 209 A. 2d 407.

Case remitted to the Superior Court, appellant to pay costs.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Jiaji Shang, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA NEW ENERGY GROUP
      COMPANY (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the
“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th
      day of August 2008.


/s/
                  Jiaji ShangJiaji
                  ShangChief
                  Executive Officer(Principal
                  Executive Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China New Energy Group Company and will be retained by China New Energy Group
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.





The
      forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.