alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of BioVeris Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,  hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




February 13, 2004                                    /s/George V. Migausky
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     George V. Migausky
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such
Act, be deemed filed by BioVeris Corporation. for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BioVeris Corporation and will be retained by BioVeris Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



<PAGE>
Exhibit 34.2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

SLM Corporation:

We have examined managements assessment, included in the accompanying Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria, dated March 27, 2014,
that Sallie Mae, Inc. (the Company), a direct wholly owned subsidiary of SLM Corporation, as Administrator and Servicer for Citibank N.A. Student Loan Corporation Trusts (Citibank Trusts) as detailed in managements assertion,
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB (Regulation AB) for the SLM Regulation AB Student Loan Platform (the Platform), as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi), 1122 (d)(3)(iii), 1122 (d)(4)(x), 1122 (d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122 (d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Citibank Trusts. Appendix B to Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as
constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment about the Companys compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included
testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected
transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP              
|                          
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|March 27, 2014
Exhibit 4.2

   FORM OF SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK CERTIFICATE OF THE REGISTRANT


                             InterWorld Corporation
   NUMBER                                                           SHARES
 [         ]                                                      [         ]
              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                                 SEE LEGEND ON
                                                                  REVERSE SIDE

             SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK - $0.01 PAR VALUE

    THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO
    REQUESTS  THE  POWERS,   DESIGNATIONS,   PREFERENCES   AND   RELATIVE,
    PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK
    OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS,  LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS
    OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS

 This certifies that
                      [                                   ]

 is the owner of
                      [                                                 ]

 fully paid and non-assessable shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of

                             InterWorld Corporation

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by duly authorized Attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate,
properly endorsed.

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized
officers.

Dated:  [              ]


-----------------------------                    -------------------------------
        SECRETARY                                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



                                       60

<PAGE>


THE SECURITIES  REPRESENTED BY THIS  CERTIFICATE  HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER
THE  SECURITIES  ACT OF  1933,  AS  AMENDED.  THE  SECURITIES  MAY NOT BE  SOLD,
TRANSFERRED  OR ASSIGNED IN THE ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE  REGISTRATION  STATEMENT
FOR THE SECURITIES UNDER SAID ACT, OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, IN FORM,  SUBSTANCE
AND SCOPE  CUSTOMARY  FOR OPINIONS OF COUNSEL IN COMPARABLE  TRANSACTIONS,  THAT
REGISTRATION  IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER SAID ACT OR UNLESS SOLD PURSUANT TO RULE 144
UNDER SAID ACT.

                                       54
<PAGE>
Before the Third Division,

March 15, 1944

No. 49258.

#### Protests 662713-G, etc., of Santo Alioto *&*Son et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to the Provolone cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706). In accordance therewith it was held to be properly dutiable upon the basis of the net weight of the cheese as returned by the United States weigher, not including the weight of the strings, less 2)4 percent for inedible coverings. Protests sustained to this extent. Abstracts 40880 and 41794 cited.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the Form 10-Q filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                         
|------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lisa F. Campbell                                    
|                   |  |     |  | Lisa F. Campbell                                        
|                   |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Operating Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hines Real Estate Investment
Trust, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  November 14, 2005
    /s/ Charles M. BaughnCharles M. BaughnChief Executive Officer 36
Case: 2:10-cv-00897-EAS-TPK Doc #: 21 Filed: 08/17/11 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T16:30:27-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 53674.

protests 123107-K, etc. (New York).

#### Biddle Purchasing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspectors as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspectors as “manifested, not found,” is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.
116 STAT. 1752 PUBLIC LAW 107–268—OCT. 30, 2002

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4717:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

June 18, considered and passed House.

Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–268

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1199 Pasadena

Boulevard in Pasadena, Texas, as the ‘‘Jim Fonteno Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1199 Pasadena Boulevard in Pasadena, Texas, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Jim Fonteno Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jim Fonteno

Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 30, 2002.

Oct. 30, 2002

[H.R. 4717]
D AN W EISS

M ANAGING D IRECTOR

, I NTERNATIONAL A FFAIRS & R EGULATORY ( 312) 997

-

7573

DAN

. WEISS @ COAIR

. COM

October 5, 2011

Robert Finamore, Acting Chief

Foreign Carrier Licensing Divisio n

Esta Rosenberg, Chief

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Notice of United Air Lines, Inc. of Termination of Code

- Share Service

Docket DOT

- OST

- 1996

- 1410

Dear Ms. Rosenb erg and Mr. Finamore :

Pursuant to the conditions applicable to the Statements of Authorization granted to United Air

Lines, Inc. (“United”) and Thai Airways International Public Co., LTD. (“Thai”) by the

Department ’s Notice of Action Taken dated October 1 8, 1996 , in the above

- referenced docket,

United hereby notifies the Department of the termination of code

- share services under which

Thai display s United’s “UA” designator code and United display s T hai’s “ TG ” designator code.

This termination of code

- shar e services will be effective on or after March 1, 2012

.

Sincerely

,

D an W eiss

Managing Director, International Affairs &

Regulatory

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC

.

c c: David HeffernanCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have thi s date served a copy of the foregoing document on all

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

carl.nelson@aa.com

efaberman@wileyrein.com (Air Tr an/Frontier)

howard_kass@usairways.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com (Hawaiian/Jet Blue)

jeff.morgan@delta.com

jyoung@yklaw.com (Sp irit)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com (USA3000) barbara.russell@virginamerica.com

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Spirit)

msinick@ssd.com (Alaska)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.allen@faa.gov

Annalei Avanceña

International Regulatory Advisor

October 5, 2011
#### Oswald Sasse, Resp’t, *v.*The Musical Mutual Protective Union, App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,*

*Filed January 24, 1890.)*

Associations—Expulsion of membeb.

Appeal from a judgment recovered on the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*Alfred Steckler,*for app’lt; *August P. Wagener,*for resp’t

Daniels, J.

No other points in support of the appeals have been taken in this action beyond those presented m the other two *372cases. The rulings at the trial were quite similar, so as not to distinguish this case from those. In the submission of it to the jury their province was limited solely to the consideration of the damages. And nothing was said or intimated which was not entirely pertinent to the questions presented by the evidence. The rights of each party were considered and protected by what was said, and the charge was fully within the range of the law and the evidence. No reason appears for questioning the correctness of the rulings, or the amount of the verdict.

And the judgment and order should be affirmed.

Yan Brunt, P. J., and Brady, J., concur.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 2 2

- 1465

BARBARA MICHEL; KARINE G. PIERRE BOUCICAUT; ANA MARISELA

DIAZ SANCHEZ; JOSE ANGEL ANDRADE; FREDY FRANCISCO FUENTES;

OSCAR OSMIN CHAVEZ

- DERAS,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES; MICHAEL J. MCCLEARY, in his official capacity as Field Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on May 11 , 202 3 , is

amended as follows:

On page 10 , line 1
, replace "of" with "or"
***FLINT
RIVER BANCSHARES, INC.***
 ***Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350***
 ***For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005***
 **Exhibit
32.2**







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Flint River Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jane W.
Timmons, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:
      June 3, 2005/s/
      Jane
      W. TimmonsJane
      W. TimmonsChief
      Financial Officer
No. 51107.

#### Protest 810124-G of Kolmar, Inc. (Cleveland).

*281Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was established that the facts in this case are almost identical with those in *Sherbrook Distributing Co.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 26, C. D. 935) and in *Kolmar, Inc.*v. *United States*(13 id. 134, C. D. 884). The *Sherbrook*case, *supra,*was appealed to the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, Suit 4526, and on March 30, 1946, it was held that the reliquidation should be based on the actual gallonage reported by the United States gauger rather than upon the exported quantities or upon the capacity of the casks, less 2)4 percent for outage, and the judgment of this court was modified to that extent. In view of the evidence presented and following the decisions cited it was held that duty is assessable on the rye upon the basis of 1,226.23 American proof gallons, and on the bourbon upon the basis of 1,227.79 American proof gallons, as returned by the United States gauger. The protest was sustained to this extent.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN DELL LAWSON, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

*Mr. Peter Murray*and *Mr. John C. Howell*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Joseph P. Lordi*and *Mr. Alan Siller*for the respondent.

May 14, 1968.

Denied.
#### Edward P. Paul & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6337.

Entry No. 5415.

Invoice dated Longton, England, August 22, 1941.

Certified August 27, 1941.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 19, 1941.

*298(Decided August 29, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement bas been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise consisting of earthenware or chinaware and the issues in the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*Suit No. 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the entered value of the merchandise consisting of earthenware or chinaware in the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the entered values. Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly..