alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



              Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
     As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      The  undersigned  hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to
my  knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September
30, 2003 of Universal Communication Systems,  Inc. (the "Company")  fully
complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information  contained in such
periodic report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial
condition and results of  operations  of the  Company as of, and for,  the
periods  presented  in such report.

Date:  January  13, 2004                         /s/ Michael J. Zwebner
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael J. Zwebner
                                                Chairman and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
Process Diagram-Sites controlled by Submitter-Manufacturing
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Henry B Burton, *Appellant.*

— Judgment and conviction reversed and a new trial ordered in the Court of Sessions of Onondaga county, to which court the case is remitteil. Opinion by Smith, P. J.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000529

27-OCT-2016

08:32 AM
No. 52703.

protests 79692-K, etc. (New York).

#### Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
### 2060 **- AR14** 

**Higgins, Cortney** to

: Mary Johnson 12/20/2012 01:03 PM
Cc : Jim Eddinger, RobertJ W ayland, Thomas Gillis, Peter Tsirigotis, Amy Cole

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ W ayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter

Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Cole/DC/USEPA/US@EPA



### Hi Mary, Thank you! Can you have the attached clean version uploaded by OP into ROCIS? I’ve opened it for amendment. Regards, Cortney
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Portec Rail Products, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
John S. Cooper, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Michael D. Bornak,
Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. November 15, 2004
    
    /s/ John S. CooperDateJohn S. Cooper, President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 15, 2004
    
    /s/ Michael D. BornakDateMichael D. Bornak, Chief Financial Officer
 A signed copy of this written statement required by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

#### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorcrossSafety Products L.L.C. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, David F.Myers, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| Dated: May 11, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ DAVID F. MYERS, JR.                            |
|---------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |   | David F. Myers, Jr.                                |
|                |   |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                |   |   | Secretary and Manager                              |
|                |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)       |

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

----
Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 32 Filed: 05/08/12 Page: 1 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 32 Filed: 05/08/12 Page: 2 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 32 Filed: 05/08/12 Page: 3 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 32 Filed: 05/08/12 Page: 4 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 32 Filed: 05/08/12 Page: 5 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 32 Filed: 05/08/12 Page: 6 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 32 Filed: 05/08/12 Page: 7 of 7  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T12:19:31-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 50565.

#### Protests 18270-K, etc., of Rich Products Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of dog food similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 175, C. A. D. 304), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quanta Capital Holdings Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Jonathan J. R. Dodd, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 9, 2006

/s/ Jonathan J.R. Dodd
---------------------------------
Jonathan J. R. Dodd
(Principal Financial Officer)

This certification is not deemed to be "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```
7107

#### STATE v. WILKES.

Burglary and Larceny. — Tracking steps from a house from which some flour was missing, near to the house of defendant, finding along this route a box in which the missing flour had been kept, defendant having no flour in the evening and coming in later in the night with flour in a sack, is some evidence of defendant’s guilt of burglary and larceny.

Before Klugh, J., Greenwood, June Term, 1908.

Affirmed.

Indictment against Lee Wilkes for burglary and larceny. From sentence on verdict of guilty, defendant'appeals.

*Mr. George T. Magill,*for appellant,

cites: *When new trial should be granted:*73 S. C., 345; 60 S. E. R., 669; 81 S. C., *24.*

*Solicitor R. A. Cooper,*contra.

Oral argument.

February 26, 1909.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The defendant, Lee Wilkes, was convicted of burglary and larceny at the June term of the Court of General Session for Greenwood county, and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. The defendant, at the close of the State’s testimony, moved for the direction of a verdict of acquittal, on the ground that there was no testimony upon which the defendant could be convicted. The trial Judge refused this motion, and the defendant allowed the case to go to the jury without putting up any evidence. Defendant moved for a new trial, contending that there was no testimony to support the jury’s finding; which motion also was refused by the Circuit Court.

*164The three exceptions taken to the overruling of these motions may be merged into one inquiry: Was there any evidence upon which the jury could have found a verdict of guilty ?

The defendant was accused of stealing two sacks of flour from the house of one Robert McDowell in the nighttime. McDowell testified to tracking steps the morning after the theft occurred from his home to within a few feet of defendant’s house. Along this route, not far from McDowell’s dwelling, was found the box in which he had left his flour. On that same morning, McDowell and two white men, T. D. Ramage and J. R. Pinson, searched Wilkes’ house and found there some flour in a barrel. Mary Jane Anderson, who lived with Wilkes, testified that he was absent in the early part of the night on which the crime was committed, and that on his return he brought back flour in a sack; that she did his cooking, and that there was no flour in the house when he went out. Her testimony as to Wilkes’ coming in with some flour that night was corroborated by Jack Eowden, colored, who was at the house when Wilkes came in. All this was certainly some evidence pointing to defendant’s guilt.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.
Before the Second Division,

January 11, 1940

No. 42985.

#### Protests 707668-G, etc., of Grand Gaslight, Inc., et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Christopher C. Horan, Appellant, v Michael Mirando et al., Respondents.

[633 NYS2d 402]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated July 25, 1994, which granted the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint upon the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a "serious injury” as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

On the morning of June 4, 1991, the plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident. After the accident, the plaintiff was treated at a hospital emergency room for neck and back pain, and was given a neck brace to wear and instructed to rest and take Tylenol. Three weeks later, the plaintiff returned to work at his home improvement contracting business. Although the plaintiff subsequently sought treatment for headaches and soreness, he last visited his physician for follow-up care approximately four months after the accident.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly concluded that he had not suffered a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). In support of their respective motions for summary judgment, the defendants submitted a report of the plaintiff’s treating physician which *507found no abnormalities of the plaintiff’s cervical spine and indicated only that "the right median nerve * * * conduction is mildly slow, which suggests a mild entrapment of the median nerve across the carpal tunnel”. This evidence was sufficient to establish a *prima facie*case that the plaintiff had not sustained a serious injury, and the burden thus shifted to the plaintiff to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact *(see, Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955; *Jean-Mehu v Berbec,*215 AD2d 440). The plaintiff failed to sustain that burden.

Although the plaintiff submitted evidence indicating that he continues to suffer from mild carpal tunnel syndrome with resultant pain and numbness in his hands, there is no indication that this condition resulted in anything more than "a minor, mild or slight limitation of use [which] should be classified as insignificant within the meaning of the statute” *(Licari v Elliott,*57 NY2d 230, 236; *see, Short v Shawn,*188 AD2d 815). Moreover, while the plaintiffs former treating physician indicated that the plaintiff was unable to perform hammering and nailing work for four months after the accident, the plaintiff was admittedly able to resume work at his home improvement business three weeks after the accident. Under these circumstances, the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether his injuries prevented him from performing substantially all of his usual and customary activities for at least 90 of the 180 days following the accident *(see, Licari v Elliott, supra; Georgia v Ramautar,*180 AD2d 713). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the report of Integrated Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”),
      on Form 10-QSB
      for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David Smith, Chief Financial Officer of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350), that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.












/s/ 
      David
      Smith


By:  David
      Smith


Chief
      Financial Officer




Dated:
      November 19, 2007
No. 42999.

#### Protest 973103-G of Frank Mahr (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

       [LOGO]               UUNET Technologies, Inc.  +1 800 488-6383 (voice)
        UUNET             22001 Loudoun County Parkway  +1 703 206-5800 (voice)
 A WorldCom Company             Ashburn, VA  20147  +1 703 208-3728 (fax)
                                    http://www.uu.net  hs-sales@uu.net
                                    -----------------
                                 UUNET is a registered trademark of UUNET
                                           Technologies, Inc.,
                                and the UUNET logo design is a trademark.
                                    All other trademarks acknowledged.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                AMENDMENT NO. 1



This Amendment No. 1 ("Amendment") to the Master Discounted Internet Services
Agreement between UUNET Technologies, Inc. ("UUNET") and Interliant, Inc.
(formerly Sage Networks, Inc.) ("Interliant") dated February 17, 1999,
("Agreement") is made as of the date of the second signature below.

The parties agree as follows:

1.  The Minimum Mbps Commitment corresponding to the Commitment Date of 12/31/00
    set forth in Section 3 of Schedule 1 is hereby reduced from 600 Mbps to 200
    Mbps.

2.  The Price/Mbps corresponding to the Commitment Date of 12/31/00 set forth in
    Section 3 of Schedule 1 is hereby reduced from $575 to $518 for service
    provided in the U.S., and shall remain $575 for service provided outside the
    U.S.

3.  Sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2, and 3.2.3 are hereby deleted.  Sections 6(b) and all
    of Section 12 other than the first sentence thereof are also hereby deleted.
    Each party hereby waives the right to enforce its rights under these deleted
    Sections of the Agreement on both a retrospective and prospective basis.

4.  This Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2001 (the "Effective
    Date").

Except as expressly provided herein, none of the provisions of the Agreement
shall be modified by this Amendment, and as hereby modified, the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.  The parties acknowledge their agreement by
signing below.


Interliant, Inc.                      UUNET Technologies, Inc.


By:____________________________       By:____________________________

Name:__________________________       Name:__________________________

Title:_________________________       Title:_________________________

Date:__________________________       Date:__________________________
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Balanced Series.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                           
|/s/ Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                         
|Robert J. Enck                                                                                                                             
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund



|                                                                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                             
|/s/ Brent Bales                                                                                                              
|Brent Bales                                                                                                                  
|Chief Financial Officer of Equinox Fund Management, LLC, the Managing Owner of Balanced Series, a Series of The Frontier Fund
|                                                                                                                             
|Date: November 13, 2007
#### Ebenezer Williams, *Appellant, v.*George L. Davis, *as Executor, etc., Respondent.*

— Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to. abide event. Opinion by Hardin, J., and dissenting opinion by Haight, J.
Exhibit 10.10

       SUMMARY OF ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN LEARNCOM, INC. AND THE ARMAND GROUP

     We have engaged The Armand Group, an investment banking firm of which Denis
Armand Mola, our Chairman of the Board, is a Managing Director, to provide
investment banking services and advice in connection with proposed acquisitions,
proposed financings and other financial and strategic matters. Under the terms
of the engagement, The Armand Group is paid a retainer of $5,000 per month,
reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses and paid commissions in amounts agreed
upon from time to time for services rendered in connection with specific merger,
acquisition or financing transactions.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September 13, 2011 | /s/ Jianhua Lv                |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                | Jianhua Lv                    |
|                                | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                                | (Principal Executive Officer) |

----