alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# $953 may be waiting for your family

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  $953 may be waiting for your family 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Internal Revenue Service 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Rev. 12-90. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Publication ; 1495; Publication (United States. Internal Revenue Service) ; 1495. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  136 × 28 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ricoh Aficio 3228 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu. 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  026153676.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




---



##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  November 14, 2006
    
    /s/ Richard J. JarosinskiDate
    
    Richard J. Jarosinski, President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2006
    
    /s/ John N. PesarsickDate
    
    John N. Pesarsick, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**














**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**









I,
      Neil
      Smit, the President and Chief Executive Officer of CCH II, LLC and CCH II
      Capital Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
      certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission:




·
            fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934; and




·
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









/s/
      Neil Smit


Neil
      Smit


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


August
      10, 2006
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, each of the undersigned certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

1.                                       The quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofNeuStar, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Information contained in such quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of NeuStar, Inc.

 
| August 15, 2005 | By:    | /s/ JEFFREY E. GANEK                 |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Jeffrey E. Ganek*Chief Executive Officer* |
|                 |   |                                      |
|                 |   |                                      |
| August 15, 2005 | By:    | /s/ JEFFREY A. BABKA                 |
|                 |   | Jeffrey A. Babka*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement has been provided to NeuStar, Inc. and will be retainedby NeuStar, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50692

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Eugene Durst Self, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:09-CR-66-1

Before Higginbotham, Smith, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Eugene Durst Self, federal prisoner # 76522-080, moves for leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and for the appointment of counsel for an 

appeal. The district court denied Self’s motion to proceed IFP, certifying 

that the appeal was not taken in good faith. By moving for IFP, Self is 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 26, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50692 Document: 00515758956 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/26/2021
No. 20-50692

2

challenging the district court’s certification. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 

197, 199-202 (5th Cir. 1997).

In his brief, Self argues that the district court abused its discretion in 

denying his motion for release by not considering relevant facts and evidence 

and by using a non-Shepard1 approved document upon which to base its 

original revocation decision. He contends that his revocation of supervised 

release was based on a violation that was vacated by the state court.

Self’s motion for release, filed in his criminal revocation case, 

essentially asked the district court to reconsider its decision to revoke his 

supervised release while his appeal was pending. Self filed his motion on 

August 10, 2020, over eight months after the district court revoked his 

supervised release in December 2019. We affirmed Self’s revocation 

sentence on August 28, 2020. United States v. Self, 818 F. App’x 381, 382 

(5th Cir. 2020). The district court did not have jurisdiction to consider this 

untimely motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Cook, 670 F.2d 46, 

48 (5th Cir. 1982); United States v. Miramontez, 995 F.2d 56, 58 n.2 (5th Cir. 

1993).

Self’s motion was unauthorized and without a jurisdictional basis, and 

“he has appealed from the denial of a meaningless, unauthorized motion.”

See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994). He has not 

shown that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion. And 

he failed to show that his appeal involves “legal points arguable on their 

merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th 

Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Therefore, the

motion to proceed IFP is DENIED, the motion for appointment of counsel 

1 Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13 (2005).

Case: 20-50692 Document: 00515758956 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/26/2021
No. 20-50692

3

is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 

F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-50692 Document: 00515758956 Page: 3 Date Filed: 02/26/2021
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8827 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8827

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 216 Cumberland Street in Rochester, New York, as the ``Minister 
               Franklin Florence Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2024

   Mr. Morelle (for himself, Mr. Goldman of New York, Mr. Meeks, Mr. 
   Kennedy, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Espaillat, and Mr. Tonko) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 216 Cumberland Street in Rochester, New York, as the ``Minister 
               Franklin Florence Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MINISTER FRANKLIN FLORENCE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 216 Cumberland Street in Rochester, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Minister Franklin Florence Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Minister 
Franklin Florence Memorial Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2007170EN.01002303.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/23

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 June 2007 — MacLean-Fogg v OHIM (LOKTHREAD)

(Case T-339/05) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark LOKTHREAD - Absolute grounds for refusal of registration - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2007/C 170/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: MacLean-Fogg Co. (Mundelein, Illinois, United States) (represented by: S. Prückner and A. Franke, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 June 2005 (Case R 1122/2004-1), concerning the registration of the word mark LOKTHREAD as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders MacLean-Fogg Co. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders MacLean-Fogg Co. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 26, 2011 

# Order

October 26, 2011

143178

- 9(121)(122)(127)(128)(129)

RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CO., L.L.C., f/k/a

RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CORPORATION,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 143178

v COA: 290248

Kent CC: 08

- 011138

- AV

GERALD SAURMAN,

Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________________________

BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 143179

v COA: 291443

Jackson CC: 08

- 003406

- AV

COREY MESSNER,

Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, motions by Gregory V. Alkema, Mortgage

Electronic Registration Systems and Mortgage Banke rs Association, Law Professor Jean

Braucher and others, and Chemical Bank, and the Michigan Chamber of Commerce to

file briefs amicus curiae are considered and they are granted. The motion by Mortgage

Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Mortgage Bank ers Association for l eave to

participate in oral argument is denied.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10256

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Eladio Loya-Palma, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-242-1

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Eladio Loya-Palma appeals his sentence for illegal reentry. The 

Guidelines range was 37–46 months of imprisonment. After determining that 

Loya-Palma’s criminal history category substantially underrepresented the 

seriousness of his criminal history or the likelihood that he would commit 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 23, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10256 Document: 00516556333 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/23/2022
No. 22-10256

2

other crimes, the district court applied an upward departure under U.S.S.G. 

§ 4A1.3(a)(1) and sentenced Loya-Palma to 56 months of imprisonment. 

We review the district court’s decision to impose an upward 

departure, as well as the extent of that departure, for an abuse of discretion. 

See United States v. Zelaya-Rosales, 707 F.3d 542, 546 (5th Cir. 2013). At 

sentencing, the district court explained that the upward departure was based 

on Loya-Palma’s status as a habitual offender, his continued engagement in 

criminal behavior, and his numerous prior offenses that did not result in

conviction. These bases are supported by the record and are permissible for 

purposes of § 4A1.3. See United States v. Lavalais, 960 F.3d 180, 189 (5th Cir. 

2020); United States v. Lopez, 871 F.2d 513, 514–15 (5th Cir. 1989). LoyaPalma’s challenge to the imposed sentence is merely a disagreement with 

how the district court weighed the relevant factors, which “is not a sufficient 

ground for reversal.” United States v. Malone, 828 F.3d 331, 342 (5th Cir. 

2016). Moreover, we have upheld proportionately greater upward departures 

than the one at issue here. See, e.g., Lavalais, 960 F.3d at 186, 189–90 

(upholding a 59-month upward departure from a Guidelines maximum of 46 

months); Zelaya-Rosales, 707 F.3d at 546 (upholding a six-month upward 

departure from a Guidelines maximum of six months).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-10256 Document: 00516556333 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/23/2022
Section 333 Amendment 

Trumbull Unmanned LLC

Prepared by: JR Gibbens, Chief Pilot 

November 12, 2015 

 Page 1 of 2

TRUMBULL UNMANNED
Request for Amendment to FAA Exemption No. 11146

 Docket No. FAA-2014-0890

12 November 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Trumbull Unmanned Exemption No. 11146

Dear Sir or Ma’am,

Trumbull Unmanned, LLC respectfully requests an additional amendment to our FAA Exemption No. 

11146, Docket No. FAA-2014-0890. We request to operate UAS, approved on our Section 333 

exemption, from a moving vehicle. Permission to operate from a moving vehicle has been previously 

approved on Section 333 exemptions. 

Trumbull teammates possess experience operating fixed wing and multirotor from vessels (moving 

and stationary) in the Department of Defense and commercially internationally. Should you have any 

questions, please contact us. We appreciate your time and consideration in this matter.

Respectfully,

 Dyan Gibbens

CEO & Founder

Trumbull Unmanned LLC

Cc: 

Rob Pappas

Jake Troutman

 Page 2 of 2

TRUMBULL UNMANNED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 8, 2008



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. Sprouls Principal Executive Officer




28
July 6,
2004



|Securities and Exchange CommissionMail Stop
      11-3450 5th Street, NorthwestWashington, D.C.
    20549
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dear Sirs/Madams:
|-----------------

We
have read Item 4 of Cartoon Acquisition, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
July 2, 2004, and have the following comments:

1.
We agree with the statements made in (i) the first sentence of paragraph 1, (ii)
paragraph 2 and (iii) paragraph 3.

2.
We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with the statement made in the
second sentence of paragraph 1.



|Yours truly,
|------------



|/s/ Berger Apple &
      Associates
Ltd.
|----------------------------------------



|Berger Apple & Associates
Ltd.
|------------------------------

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Christopher Doran, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Doranetti Music Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Doranetti Music Inc. for the interim period ended April 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Doranetti Music Inc.

Dated: June 20, 2006

/s/ Christopher Doran	Christopher Doran
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harold C.F. Dickout, President, Chief
Executive Officer, Chairman and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Acting
Principal Financial Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer) of Americas
Wind Energy Corporation,, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Americas Wind Energy Corporation for the six month period ended January 31,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Americas Wind Energy Corporation.

|Date: March 14, 2008                                            | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                | 
|*/s/ Harold C.F. Dickout*                                       | 
|Harold C.F. Dickout                                             | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman
      and Director | 
|(Principal Executive Officer, Acting
      Principal Financial  | 
|Officer and Acting Principal Accounting
      Officer)          | 

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rhino Resource Partners LP (the "Partnership") for the
year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Zatezalo, as Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

By:

/s/ DAVID G. ZATEZALO Name:  David G. Zatezalo
Title:Chief Executive Officer


Date:
March 18, 2011

---



QuickLinks