alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***Turner
        Valley Oil & Gas, Inc.***
 6160
        Genoa Bay Road Duncan
 B.C.
        Canada V9L 5Y5
 Form
        Type: 10-KSB
  AUDIT
        COMMITTEE REPORT
   The
        Audit
        Committee of Turner Valley Oil & Gas,Inc. s composed of the Corporation's
        Board of Directors. The members of the Committee are Christopher Paton-Gay,
        Donald Jackson Wells and Joseph A. Kane. The Committee recommended, subject
        to
        stockholder ratification, the selection of the Corporation's independent
        accountants.
  Management
        is responsible for the Corporation's internal controls and the financial
        reporting process. The independent accountants are responsible for performing
        an
        independent audit of the Corporation's consolidated financial statements
        in
        accordance with the generally accepted auditing standards and to issue a
        report
        thereon. The Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these
        processes.
  In
        this
        context, the Committee has met and held discussions with management and the
        independent accountants. Management represented to the Committee that the
        Corporation's financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally
        accepted accounting principles, and the Committee has reviewed and discussed
        the
        consolidated financial statements with management and the independent
        accountants. The Committee discussed with the independent accountants matters
        required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No.
        61.
  The
        Corporation's independent accountants also provided to the Committee the
        written
        disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, and
        the
        Committee discussed with the independent accountant that firms
        independence.
  Based
        upon Committee's discussion with management and the independent accountants
        and
        the Committee's review of the representation of management and the report
        of the
        independent accountants to the Committee, the Committee recommended that
        the
        audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Corporation's
        Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Dated:
        April 12, 2007
  Christopher
                  Paton-Gay
              
              Donald
                  Jackson Wells
              
              Joseph
                  KaneChristopher
                  Paton-Gay
              
              Donald
                  Jackson Wells
              
              Joseph
                  Kane
7108

#### *EX PARTE*JONES. *IN RE*STATE v. JONES.

Bail. — Appeal lies from order refusing bail, but if day of trial arrives before appeal can be heard and decided the necessary result is to end the appeal.

From order of the Chief Justice staying trial of case of *State*v. *W. F. Jones*pending appeal of defendant from Circuit order refusing bail, State appeals.

*165*Solicitor T. S. Sease*and *Messrs. P. D. Barron, P. IT. Nelson*and /. *A. Sawyer,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Tozvnsend & Townsend, James Munro*and *John-stone & Cromer,*contra.

February *27,*1909.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The defendant, W. T. Jones, being imprisoned in the jail of Union county on the charge of murder, obtained from Judge Hydrick a writ of *habeas corpus.*The return was heard on 25th July, 1908, and on the 28th July, Judge Hydrick filed an order refusing bail. No notice of the order was served, but on 10th August, 1908, defendant’s counsel served notice of intention to appeal to the Supreme Court from the order refusing bail, and on the 8th September, 1908, served on the solicitor the proposed case for appeal. The Court of General Sessions for Union county convened on 8th September. After arraignment, and demand by defendant’s counsel of the three days allowed by law, the trial was set for 11th September, 1908. In the meantime, on the application of defendant’s counsel, made without notice to the solicitor, the Chief Justice had passed an order dated 9th September, 1908: “That the trial of the prisoner now attempted to be held in the Circuit Court shall cease until the Supreme Bench of South Carolina shall pass upon the rights of the appeal presented by the prisoner, and that in the meanwhile the Circuit Court shall suspend any action looking to the trial of the accused until the Supreme Court has acted.”

On Friday, 11th September, 1908, when the cause was called for trial in the Circuit Court, the order of the Chief Justice was presented and Honorable J. C. Klugh, the presiding Judge, out of respect for the order, continued the cause. Thereafter, the State appealed from the order of the Chief Justice. Section 107 of the Criminal Code pro*166vides: “An appeal from all final decisions rendered on applications for writs of *habeas corpus*shall be allowed as is provided by law in civil actions.” *State*v. *Hill,*3 Brev., 90; *State*v. *Holmes,*3 Strob., 272; *Ex parte Kottman,*2 Hill, 363; *Ex parte Smith,*8 S. C., 512.

The sole object of an application for bail under a writ of *habeas corpus*is to release the accused from prison until the day of trial. Whether bail be granted or improperly denied, the function of the writ is at an end when the day of trial arrives. So also the only effect of a reversal on appeal of the order denying bail would be to give the accused bail until the day of trial arrives, when it would end. Hence, if the day of trial arrives before the appeal is heard, and decided, the necessary result is to end the appeal. For this reason, the order of the Chief Justice was reversed by the order of this Court already filed.

The Chiee Justice *did not sit, being disqualified.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8688 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to treat food for 

human consumption as adulterated if it contains high-fructose corn syrup. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2024 

Mrs. LUNA (for herself and Mr. MOYLAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

treat food for human consumption as adulterated if it 

contains high-fructose corn syrup. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Spoonfuls of Fake 

5 Sugar Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NO FOOD CONTAINING HIGH-FRUCTOSE CORN 

7 SYRUP. 

8 (a) ADULTERATION.—Section 402 of the Federal 

9 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 342) is amend10 ed by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8688 IH

1 ‘‘(j) If it is food for human consumption and contains 

2 high-fructose corn syrup.’’. 

3 (b) DELAYED APPLICABILITY.—Section 402(j) of the 

4 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by sub5 section (a), applies beginning on the date that is 1 year 

6 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15866-15867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Record of Decision--Barry M. Goldwater Range Integrated Natural 
Resource Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement

ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Air Force and the United States Marine Corps 
completed Barry M. Goldwater Range Integrated Natural Resource 
Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by signing a 
Record of Decision (ROD). The ROD is

[[Page 15867]]

based on matters discussed in the Final EIS, inputs from the public and 
regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final EIS was made 
available on May 26, 2006 through a notice in the Federal Register 
(Volume 71, Number 102) with a waiting period ending June 26, 2006. The 
ROD documents the decisions of the Air Force and the Marine Corps as 
analyzed in the Final EIS, in furtherance of the Military Lands 
Withdrawal Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106-65) and the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 
670) prescribing a management plan for the natural resources present on 
the BMGR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jack Bush, Headquarters Air Force, 
703-604-5264 or Ms. Mary D. Hassell, Headquarters Marine Corps, 703-
695-8240, ext 3339.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-6136 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
#### Peter Garrity, *Appellant, v.*The Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, *Respondents.*

— Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Haight, J.
No. 46252.

#### Protest 58010-K of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the clothes and hat brushes in question are similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Heinrich Herrmann & Weiss*(26 C. C. P. A. 292, C. A. D. 30) the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 1506 was sustained.
No. 40283.

#### Protests 755136-G, etc., of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of novelties in chief value of rubber. They were held dutiable at 25 percent, under paragraph 1537 (b) on the authority of Abstract 25607. Uninflated rubber balls or so-called beach balls the same as those the subject of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 48231) and *United States*v. *Woolworth*(24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502.
No. 38957.

#### Protest 315492-G of General Shipping & Trdg. Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was agreed that certain items consist of yarns in the . form of singles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those the subject of *Asiam*v. *United States*(T. D. 48133). The claim at 40 cents per pound under • paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00487

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.C. , a Child

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- PA

- 01162

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge Presiding 1

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

Appellant is indigent. No costs are taxed in this appeal.

SIGNED February 15, 2017.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

1 The Honorable Laura Salinas is the presiding judge of the 166th Judicial District Court. The order terminating the

Appellant’s parental rights was signed by the Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section l3(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 15, 2006
    
    /s/ Charles M. BaughnCharles M. BaughnChief Executive OfficerDate: May 15, 2006
    
    /s/ Sherri W. SchugartSherri W. SchugartChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Peterson, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: May 12, 2008 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT A. PETERSON                         |
|--------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                  | Robert A. Peterson                             |   |   |   |
|                     |                  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Manager |   |
|                     |                  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  |   |

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
EX-10.9(a)



 Exhibit 10.9(a) 
 June 1, 2014 
 Graham Capital Management, L.P. 

Rock Ledge Financial Center 
 40 Highland Avenue

 Rowayton, CT 06853 
 Attention:
Mr. Paul Sedlack 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewals  
 Dear Mr. Sedlack: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2015 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II 



 

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 MSMF Custom Solutions Fund L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mrs. Alice Lonero at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1304, 
 Very truly yours, 

 

					
	 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Alice Lonero
	 	
		 	 Alice Lonero
	 	
		 	Chief Financial Officer	 	
		
	GRAHAM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul Sedlack
	 	
		 	Print Name: Paul Sedlack	 	

 AL/sr
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Davis, Appellant.

[635 NYS2d 487]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered December 23, 1992, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By decision and order of this Court dated June 5, 1995, the matter was remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to hear and report on whether the defendant was present during the trial court’s questioning of two prospective jurors, and the appeal was held in abeyance in the interim *(see, People v Davis,*216 AD2d 314). The Supreme Court has now filed its report.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, a new trial is ordered on the count of the indictment charging the defendant with criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and the count of the indictment which charged the defendant with murder in the second degree is dismissed, without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charges to another Grand Jury *(see, People v Beslanovics,*57 NY2d 726).

*558After remittitur of this case for a factual reconstruction hearing, the attorneys for the respective parties stipulated that the defendant was not present during the trial court’s questioning of two prospective jurors, which questioning triggered *Antommarchi*considerations *(see, People v Antommarchi,*80 NY2d 247). Accordingly, reversal is mandated *(see, People v Pinero,*220 AD2d 540; *People v Morris,*217 AD2d 561).

In view of the foregoing, we need not reach the defendant’s remaining contentions. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. (the“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert A. Peterson, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| Dated:  November 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT A. PETERSON                          |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | Robert A. Peterson                              |
|                           |   | President, Chief  Executive Officer and Manager |
|                           |   | (Principal Executive  Officer)                  |

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

----
**Exhibit31.2**

 

Certification ofPrincipal Financial Officer

 

I, Howard M. Nathan,certify that:

 

1)              I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pelican Financial, Inc.;

 

2)              Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3)              Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4)              The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [Intentionally Omitted] for the registrant andwe have:

 

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             [IntentionallyOmitted];

 

c)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

d)             disclosed in thisquarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5)              The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: May 13, 2004                          |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                        |
| /s/ Howard M. Nathan                        |   |
| Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5795]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than April 23, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc., Hammond, Louisiana; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Homestead Bancorp, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire Homestead Bank, both of Ponchatoula, 
Louisiana, and thereby engage in operating a savings association, 
pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 26, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-5795 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
No. 56052.

protest 167792-K (Philadelphia).

#### Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
### Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 12/11 / 13 Regional Airline Association 12/11 /13 Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 12/11/ 13 Airlines for America Robert Ireland 12/ 11/ 13