alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8976 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.8976

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 20 West White Street in Millstadt, Illinois, as the ``Corporal Matthew 
                         A. Wyatt Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CORPORAL MATTHEW A. WYATT POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 20 West White Street in Millstadt, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Corporal Matthew A. Wyatt Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Matthew A. Wyatt Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Zatta,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 13, 2009                            |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/ ROBERT J.  ZATTA                          |   |
| Robert J. Zatta                                    |   |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report") of New Mountain
Finance Corporation (the "Registrant"), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David M. Cordova, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



/s/ DAVID M. CORDOVAName:

David M. CordovaDate:

March 2, 2015


---



QuickLinks
#### Siter et al., Appellants, v. Harris Estate.

Argued May 7, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*633
      *Edward J. Zetusky, Jr.,*for appellants.

*Edward V. Gantlin,*with him *Hinkson & Gantlin,*for appellee.

June 27, 1969:

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

Order affirmed.
Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  May 7, 2009
    /s/ Richard J. JarosinskiDate
    Richard J. Jarosinski, President and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive OfficerMay 7, 2009
    /s/ John N. PesarsickDate
    John N. Pesarsick, Chief Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 99.3  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Silver Trust (the Trust) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, John Wilson, Principal Executive Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the Manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.  This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.  Date: March 31, 2014   /s/   JOHN WILSONJohn   WilsonPrincipal   Executive Officer
No. 53666.

protests 130008-K and 130009-K (Philadelphia).

#### T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
SEC Reference 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Eco Science Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Don Lee Taylor, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:






(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and






(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Don Lee TaylorDon Lee TaylorPrincipal Financial OfficerDate: May 17, 2016
#### William A. Jenkins, *Appellant, v.*John N. Welch, *Respondent.*

■— Motion denied, without costs.
**Exhibit10.2**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1**

**TO THE**

**2005OPTION PLAN OF SAFETY PRODUCTS HOLDINGS, INC.**

In accordance with thepower reserved to it in Section 7.3 of the 2005 Option Plan of Safety ProductsHoldings, Inc. (the “Plan”), the Board of Directors of Safety ProductsHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby amends the Plan, effective October 18,2006, as follows:

**Section 2.1 of the Plan is herebyamended in its entirety to read as follows:**

“2.1         Shares Subject to Plan.       The shares of stock subject to Optionsshall be shares of Common Stock.  Subjectto Section 7.1, the aggregate number of such shares which may be issued uponexercise of Options or otherwise under the Plan shall not exceed the 207,000shares reserved for issuance to certain management stockholders pursuant to theManagement Subscription Agreement (as that term is defined in the Recitals tothe Management Stockholders Agreement) plus 1,436,631 shares which shall bereserved for issuance upon exercise of Options granted to Employees andConsultants performing the functions of an Employee.”

**Section 7.2 of the Plan is herebyamended by adding the following to the beginning of the section:**

“Except asotherwise provided in an Option Agreement,”

To record the adoption ofthis Amendment No. 1 to the Plan, the Company has caused its authorizedofficers to affix its corporate name and seal this 18th day of October, 2006.
| [CORPORATE SEAL] | SAFETY PRODUCTS HOLDINGS, INC. |
|------------------|--------------------------------|
|             |                           |
|             |                           |
|             |                           |
|             | By:                            | /s/ Robert A. Peterson |

 

----
#### Thos. E. Kane, Resp’t, *v.*The City of Troy, App’lt.

*Levi Smith,*for resp’t; *JR. A. Pa/rmenter,*for app’lt.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Affirming 16 N. Y. State Rep., 341.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(c)

                       CONSENT OF BARRY G. SKOLNICK, ESQ.

I hereby consent to the reference to my name under the caption "Legal Matters"
in the prospectus included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form N-4 for certain variable annuity insurance contracts issued
through ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account A of ML Life Insurance
Company of New York, File No. 333-34894.

                                          By:         /s/ BARRY G. SKOLNICK
                                          --------------------------------------
                                               Barry G. Skolnick, Esq.
                                               President and General Counsel

April 26, 2001
ANNUAL RETURN and DECLARATION
         (Pursuant to Sect. 187 and 188, Companies Law, (1998 Revision)
                           Laws of the Cayman Islands

                                EXEMPTED COMPANY

(Name)                 ifg.com, Inc.
(Code No.)             CR-75001
(Address)              PO Box 10098 APO
                       Grand Pavilion Commercial Centre, West Bay Road
                       Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands

(Fee sent with return) $573.17 USD ($470.00 CI)

                                   DECLARATION

We, ifg.com, Inc., Do Hereby Declare as follows:

(a)  Since the previous return (or since registration*) of the company there has
     been no alteration in the memorandum of association,  other than alteration
     in the name of the company,  effected in accordance  with section 31, or an
     alteration already reported in accordance with section 10,

(b)  the  operations  of the  Exempted  Company  since the last return (or since
     registration*) of the company, have been mainly outside the Cayman Islands,
     and

(c)  the  provisions of sections 193 and 194 have been,  and are being  complied
     with.

Dated this 31st day of January, 2001.

                                     ifg.com


                                     Per: __(signature)_______________________
                                          Director

                                     [Stamp - Registrar of Companies
                                                   Jan 31 2001
                                                Cayman Islands]






<PAGE>
No. 54167.

#### Roche-Organon, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 143868-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon v*. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015 (the "Report") of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the "Registrant"), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Shiraz Y. Kajee, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ SHIRAZ Y. KAJEEName:Shiraz Y. KajeeDate:February 29, 2016
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE
QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q
TO BE FILED UNDER SECTIONS 13 AND 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS AMENDED I, Sherri W. Schugart, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hines Real Estate
Investment Trust, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. /s/ SHERRI W. SCHUGARTSherri W. SchugartChief Financial Officer Date: August 16, 2004
EXHIBIT 34.1






ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH




SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES







REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders


Entergy Arkansas, Inc.


Little Rock, Arkansas





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria For Asset-Backed Securities, that Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB applicable for Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC’s Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds (the “Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), (1)(iii), (1)(iv), (2)(iii), (2)(vi), (4)(iii), (4)(v), (4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii), and (4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 for Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC’s Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP




New Orleans, Louisiana


March 28, 2014
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) to the quarterly report of G2 Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2009 (the Report), I, Gust Kepler, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Gust Kepler            
|Gust Kepler                
|Principal Financial Officer
|August 7, 2009             

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007140EN.01001902.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/19

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 3 May 2007 — Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-219/04) (1)

1

(Fisheries - Adjustment of the capacity of Member States' fishing fleets - Entry/exit scheme - Committee for fisheries and aquaculture - Rules on the use of languages)

(2007/C 140/30)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. van Rijn and S. Pardo Quintillán, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1439/2003 of 12 August 2003 laying down implementing rules on the Community Fleet Policy as defined in Chapter III of Council Regulation No. 2371/2002

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 10.01.2004, (formerly Case C-464/03)

1

---
NO. 07-10-00202-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JUNE 17, 2010

IN RE R. WAYNE JOHNSON, RELATOR

Before QUINN, C.J., a nd CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator R. Wayne Johnson, proceeding pro se , filed a petition for a writ of

mandamus on May 14, 2010. By letter of May 17, we informed relator of his failure to

pay the requisite filing fee and explained the cause would be subject to dismissal if the

fee was not received by May 27. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. Re lator has not paid the fee

as directed or filed an a ffidavit of indigency. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.

Accordingly, we dismi ss relator’s petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(c).

Per Curiam
|[BERGER APPLE
      LETTERHEAD]
|-------------------------------



|[BERGER, APPLE
      LOGO]Berger, Apple
      & Associates Ltd.Certified Public
      AccountantsEstablished
      1945
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|June 15,
      2005
|-------------------



|Randolph S.
      HudsonCARTOON
      ACQUISITION, INC.P. O. Box
      202Wyoming, NY
      14591-0202
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Resignation as
Cartoon's Certifying Accountants



|Dear Mr.
      Hudson:
|----------------------

Please be advised that
as of January 1, 2004, we had resigned as certifying accountants for Cartoon
Acquisition, Inc.

If you have any further
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (216)514-4125.



|Very truly
      yours,
|-----------------------



|BERGER, APPLE
      & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|--------------------------------------



|/s/ Alan W.
      BergerAlan W. Berger,
      C.P.A.
|----------------------------------------------------

25550 Chagrin Blvd.,
Ste. 101, Beachwood, Ohio 44122 [Color Mark] (216) 514.4125 Fax: (216)
292.9238

---