alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1






Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors


Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.:




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-172145) on Form S-8 of Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. of our reports dated March 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. as of December 31, 2010; the consolidated balance sheet of Summit Hotel OP, LP as of December 31, 2010; and the consolidated balance sheet of Summit Hotel Properties, LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in members’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010, and the related financial statement schedule III, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. and Summit Hotel OP, LP.









/ s / KPMG LLP







Omaha, Nebraska


March 31, 2011
#### EMPIRE CASUALTY CO. OF WEST VIRGINIA v. STEVENS et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

January 26, 1911.)

No. 1,005.

Appeal *1022from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Philippi.

For opinion below, see 180 Fed. 283.

W. W. Van Winkle, Mason G. Ambler, and H. F. Stockwell, for appellant. John Marshall, Alonzo D. Miles, and Luther E. Mackall, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed under rule 20. Appeljant to pay costs. Agreement filed.
No. 61938.

#### Camarge Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 312054-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8766 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8766

To amend title 4, United States Code, to allow for cemetery flags to be 
 displayed in an upright position directly adjacent to the grave sites 
  of deceased members of the Armed Forces or veterans, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2024

   Mr. Steil (for himself, Mr. Bost, Mr. Bergman, and Mr. Van Orden) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to allow for cemetery flags to be 
 displayed in an upright position directly adjacent to the grave sites 
  of deceased members of the Armed Forces or veterans, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Flags to Honor Our Veterans 
Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. CEMETERY FLAGS.

    Section 6 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(h) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the flag 
may be displayed in a secured, upright position directly adjacent to 
the grave site of a deceased member of the Armed Forces (as defined in 
section 101 of title 10) or veteran (as defined in section 101 of title 
38).''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Arkmael Ray Sales,

Plaintiff

 v.

Mr. K. Smith, et al.,

Defendants

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00239

Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

 Defendants’ June 12, 2012 motion to strike document 43 (doc. 47) is GRANTED.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to strike plaintiff’s second motion for production of

documents (doc. 43). Requests for discovery should be served on opposing counsel and

are not filed with the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a).

s/ Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:11-cv-00239-ALM-MRA Doc #: 49 Filed: 06/22/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<PAGE>




                                 Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of BioVeris Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
George V. Migausky, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: February 14, 2005                  /s/ George V. Migausky
       ------------------------           ------------------------------------
                                          George V. Migausky
                                          Vice President and Chief Financial
                                          Officer





A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Second Division,

May 11, 1961

No. 65611.

#### Florea & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/10254 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of knit nylon gloves similar in use to cotton gloves, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 55361.

#### American Meshed Fur Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 136206-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date:             |  |                        
|November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ John P. Manning    
|                  |  |                        
|                  |  | John P. Manning        
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |                        
|                  |  |                        



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Artificial
Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended February 29, 2020 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Garett Parsons, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: July 28, 2020/s/ Garett ParsonsGarett Parsons, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer)  This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

 EASTERN DIVISION

Angela Young, :

 Plaintiff, :

 v. : Case No. 2:10-cv-960

 JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

Commissioner of Social Magistrate Judge Kemp

 Security, :

 

Defendant. :

 ORDER

 This case is before the Court to consider a Report and

Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on June 20, 2011. 

The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have

been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the

Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The statement of

errors is OVERRULED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in

favor of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:10-cv-00960-GLF-TPK Doc #: 16 Filed: 07/20/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8498 

To authorize funding for necessary expenses for the rehabilitation, modernization, and construction of facilities and infrastructure at the United States 

Merchant Marine Academy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2024 

Mr. GARBARINO (for himself, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. VALADAO, Mrs. KIGGANS of 

Virginia, Mr. LALOTA, Mr. D’ESPOSITO, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. VAN

DREW, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. LAWLER, and Mr. MOLINARO) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize funding for necessary expenses for the rehabilitation, modernization, and construction of facilities and 

infrastructure at the United States Merchant Marine 

Academy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8498 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

2 UNITED STATES MERCHANT MARINE ACAD3 EMY INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES 

4 MODERNIZATION. 

5 There are authorized to be appropriated to the De6 partment of Transportation for expenses necessary for the 

7 phased rehabilitation, modernization, and construction of 

8 facilities and infrastructure at the United States Merchant 

9 Marine Academy, consistent with the Full Speed Ahead 

10 plan developed by the Maritime Security Infrastructure 

11 Council as set forth in the Congressional Record dated 

12 February 28, 2024, $1,020,000,000, of which— 

13 (1) $54,000,000 shall be made available in fis14 cal year 2025 for design and planning purchases, 

15 which shall be used for the development of a design 

16 and plan for the phased rehabilitation, moderniza17 tion, and construction of facilities and infrastructure 

18 at the United States Merchant Marine Academy; 

19 and 

20 (2) $107,333,333 shall be made available for 

21 each of year fiscal years 2026 through 2034 for con22 struction and contingency purchases necessary to 

23 execute the design and construction as described in 

24 paragraph (1). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2007155EN.01001301.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/13

---

Action brought on 25 April 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-217/07)

(2007/C 155/24)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: W. Wils and P. Dejmek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community's railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (1),
  and with
  Directive 2004/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 96/48/EC on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system and Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system (2),
  or in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under those directives; |
| --- | --- |

—

declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community's railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (1),

1

and with

Directive 2004/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 96/48/EC on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system and Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system (2),

2

or in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under those directives;

| — | order that the Kingdom of the Netherlands pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the Kingdom of the Netherlands pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing those directives into national law expired on 30 April 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 44.

1

(2)  OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 114.

2

---
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MakeMyTrip Limited (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: June 6, 2014

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, and is not being “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subjectto the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
# C_2007170EN.01004301.xml

| 21.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/43

---

Action brought on 21 May 2007 –Behmer v Parliament

(Case F-47/07)

(2007/C 170/82)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Joachim Behmer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare unlawful the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament relating to the ‘Policy on promotion and on career planning’ of 6 July 2005 and the ‘Implementing measures relating to the award of merit points and to promotion’ of 25 July 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare unlawful the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament relating to the ‘Policy on promotion and on career planning’ of 6 July 2005 and the ‘Implementing measures relating to the award of merit points and to promotion’ of 25 July 2005;

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority not to promote the applicant to grade A*13 with effect from 1 January 2005 in the 2005 promotions procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority not to promote the applicant to grade A*13 with effect from 1 January 2005 in the 2005 promotions procedure;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a grade AD12 official of the European Parliament who is currently Vice-President of the Trade Union of the European Public Service, Luxembourg (Union Syndicale Luxembourg), pleads in the first place the unlawfulness of the decisions referred to in the first indent above, which are in his opinion general provisions for giving effect to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities (‘Staff Regulations’) for the purposes of Article 110 thereof.

The applicant also pleads infringement of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and of the principles governing reasonable career prospects, equality of treatment and the duty to give reasons, and he also pleads a manifest error of assessment. In particular, he asserts that the administration, after annulling, following his first complaint, the decision to award him 2 merit points, should have promoted him to grade AD13.

Finally, the applicant contends that he was discriminated against because of his activities as a representative of the personnel, contrary to Article 1d and 24b of the Staff Regulations, to the sixth paragraph of Article 1 of Annex II of the Staff Regulations and to Article 17 of the Agreement of 12 July 1990 between the European Parliament and the trade unions or staff associations of the personnel of the institution.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2017

No. 04-17-00026-CV

Michele R. PAULI 

Appellant (Cross-Appellee)

v.

Michael D. HAYES and Teresa C. Hayes 

Appellees (Cross-Appellants)

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-12272

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to October 30, 2017.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: __________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

cc: Beth Watkins

Watkins Appeals, PLLC

926 Chulie Drive

San Antonio, TX 78216-6522

Lorien Whyte

Pozza & Whyte, PLLC

239 E. Commerce Street

San Antonio, TX 78205

Roger G. Bresnahan

Farrimond Castillo & Bresnahan, P.C.

130 E. Travis, Suite 350

San Antonio, TX 78205

David L. Earl

Earl & Associates, P.C.

Pyramid Building

601 NW Loop 410, Suite 390

San Antonio, TX 78216

Grant Gaines

Patel Gaines, PLLC

14414 Blanco Road, Suite 320

San Antonio, TX 78216
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

LISA C. BOURASSA,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00235

v. Judge GREGORY L. FROST

Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the February 3, 2012 Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 15) The Magistrate Judge recommended

that the Court remand this case for further consideration. The Commissioner of Social Security

(“Commissioner”) filed his Objections to the Report and Recommendation on February 16,

2012. (ECF No. 16.) 

This Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Following review, the Court agrees with the reasoning and analysis of the

Magistrate Judge. In particular, the current record evidence reflects that the ALJ erred by

relying on her own lay medical judgments in weighing the medical evidence and assigning

Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity. The Court finds the Commissioner’s Objections

unpersuasive, as they track the contentions within his initial Memorandum in Opposition and do

not attempt to engage the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. See Robert v. Tesson, 507 F.3d 981, 994

(6th Cir. 2007) (“[A] general objection to a magistrate judge’s report, which fails to specify the

issues of contention, does not suffice to preserve an issue for appeal . . . .”) (citation omitted). 

Accordingly, the Commissioner’s Objections are OVERRULED and the Report and

Case: 2:11-cv-00235-GLF-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/08/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Recommendation is ADOPTED. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further

consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case: 2:11-cv-00235-GLF-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 03/08/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 9, 2020

No. 04-19-00466-CR

Scott Ralph WHEELOCK,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B18291

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s “Motion for Affirmance with Damages” is carried with the appeal.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court