17110 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices 

Incomplete Requests for Review 

We have not initiated administrative 

reviews with respect to the companies 

listed below which the Department was 

unable to locate in prior segments and 

for which no new information as to the 

party’s location was provided by the 

requestor. Although the LSA requested 

that the Department reconsider this 

decision, we continue to find that it is 

inappropriate to initiate an 

administrative review of companies 

which we know that we cannot locate. 

Based on previous unsuccessful efforts 

by the Department to locate these 

companies, further efforts would be 

futile, absent new information as to 

their location. 

Brazil 

Aquamaris Aquaculture SA 

Camaros do Brasil Ltda. 

Camexim Captura Mec Exports Imports 

Campi Camaroa do Piaui Ltda. 

Juno Ind & Com de Pescados 

Ortico 

Produvale Produtos do Vale Ltda. 

Seafarm Criacao E Comericio de 

Produtos Aquaticos Ltda. 

SM Trading Industria E Comercio Ltda. 

Terracor Tdg Exp. E Imp. Ltda. 

Ecuador 

Brimon, S.A. 

India 

Adani Exportse 

Alfuzz Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. 

AMI Enterprises 

Baby Marine Sarass 

Bengal Marine Pvt. Ltd. 

Bluefin Enterprises 

Central Calcutta Cold Storage 

Exporter Coreline Exports 

Fernando Intercontinental 

Gadre Marine Exports 

Galaxy Maritech Exports P. Ltd. 

Indo Aquatics 

Lourde Exports 

Markoorlose Sea Foods 

Msngr Aqua Intl 

Noorani Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

Overseas Marine Export 

Premier Seafoods Exim (P) Ltd. 

Razban Seafoods Ltd. 

Reddy & Reddy Importers & Exports 

Riviera Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

S & S Seafoods 

Safa Enterprises 

Santhi Fisheries & Exports Ltd. 

Shivaganga Marine Products 

Shroff Processed Food & Cold ZStorage 

P Ltd. 

Tim Tim Far East Export Trading Co.(P) 

Ltd 

V.S Exim Pvt Ltd. 

Thailand 

Assoc. Commercial Systems 

Daiho (Thailand) Co., Ltd. 

Frozen Marine Products Co., Ltd. 

Yong Siam Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

Selection of Respondents 

Section 777A(c)(1) of the Act directs 

the Department to calculate individual 

dumping margins for each known 

exporter and producer of the subject 

merchandise. Where it is not practicable 

to examine all known producers/ 

exporters of subject merchandise 

because of the large number of such 

companies, section 777A(c)(2) of the Act 

permits the Department to limit its 

examination to either: (1) A sample of 

exporters, producers or types of 

products that is statistically valid based 

on the information available at the time 

of selection; or (2) exporters and 

producers accounting for the largest 

volume of subject merchandise from the 

exporting country that can be 

reasonably examined. 

Due to the large number of firms 

requested for these administrative 

reviews and the resulting administrative 

burden to review each company for 

which a request has been made, the 

Department is exercising its authority to 

limit the number of respondents 

selected for review. See section 

777A(c)(2) of the Act. In selecting the 

respondents for individual review, the 

Department intends to select the largest 

exporters/producers by U.S. sales/ 

export volume. 

Quantity and Value (‘‘Q&V’’) 

Questionnaire 

In advance of issuance of the 

antidumping questionnaire, we will also 

be requiring all parties for whom a 

review is requested to respond to a Q&V 

questionnaire, which will request 

information on the respective quantity 

and U.S. dollar sales value of all exports 

of shrimp to the United States during 

the period February 1, 2006, through 

January 31, 2007. The Q&V 

questionnaire will be available on the 

Department’s Web site at http:// 

www.trade.gov/ia/. The responses to the 

Q&V questionnaire are due to the 

Department by close of business on 

April 23, 2007. Due to the time 

constraints imposed by our statutory 

and regulatory deadlines, the 

Department may be unable to grant any 

extensions for the submission of the 

Q&V questionnaire responses. In 

responding to the Q&V questionnaire, 

please refer to the instructions 

contained in the Q&V questionnaire. 

All firms requested for review are 

required to submit a complete response 

to the Q&V questionnaire, within the 

time limits established in this notice of 

initiation, in order for such information 

to receive consideration. For parties that 

fail to timely respond to the Q&V 

questionnaire, the Department may 

resort to the use of facts otherwise 

available, and may employ an adverse 

inference if the Department determines 

that the party failed to cooperate by not 

acting to the best of its ability. See 

section 776 of the Act. All information 

submitted by respondents in these 

administrative reviews is subject to 

verification. See section 782 of the Act. 

Due to the large number of parties in 

these proceedings, and the Department’s 

need to complete its proceedings within 

the statutory deadlines, the Department 

will be limited in its ability to extend 

deadlines on the above submissions. As 

noted above, the Q&V questionnaire will 

be available on the Department’s Web 

site at http://www.trade.gov/ia/. 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Instructions for filing such applications 

may be found on the Department’s Web 

site at http://www.trade.gov/ia/. 

This initiation and notice are in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: April 2, 2007. 

James P. Maeder, 

Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2. 

[FR Doc. E7–6504 Filed 4–5–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–817] 

Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

Mexico: Amended Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On January 16, 2007, a Bi–

National Panel (‘‘Panel’’) constituted 

under the North American Free Trade 

Agreement (‘‘NAFTA’’) affirmed the 

U.S. Department of Commerce’s (‘‘the 

Department’s’’) redetermination on 

remand of the final results of the fourth 

antidumping duty administrative review 

on oil country tubular goods from 

Mexico. See In the Matter of: Oil 

Country Tubular Goods from Mexico; 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Review and Determination Not to 

Revoke, USA–MEX–2001–1904–05. The 

Department is now issuing these 

amended final results for this fourth 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices 17111 

administrative review to reflect the 

Panel’s decision. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Drury or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14 th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–

3019, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 21, 2001, the Department 

published the final results of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

on oil country tubular goods (‘‘OCTG’’) 

for the period August 1, 1998 to July 31, 

1999. See Oil Country Tubular Goods 

from Mexico: Final Results of 

Antidumping Review and Determination 

Not To Revoke in Part, 66 FR 15832 

(‘‘Final Results’’) and accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum 

(‘‘Decision Memo’’). The Department 

reviewed sales to the United States by 

Hylsa S.A. de C.V. (‘‘Hylsa’’) and Tubos 

de Aceros de Mexico, S.A. (‘‘TAMSA’’), 

both Mexican producers of OCTG. In the 

fourth administrative review, both 

TAMSA and Hylsa requested revocation 

from the order in accordance with 19 

CFR § 351.222(e)(1). The Department 

declined to revoke the order in part with 

respect to TAMSA, as it determined that 

TAMSA ‘‘did not sell the subject 

merchandise in the United States in 

commercial quantities in each of the 

three years cited by TAMSA to support 

its request for revocation.’’ See Decision 

Memo at page 10. The Department 

declined to revoke the order in part with 

respect to Hylsa due to the finding of a 

dumping margin in the Final Results. Id. 

at 23. 

Subsequent to the completion of the 

fourth administrative review, both Hylsa 

and TAMSA challenged the 

Department’s findings and requested 

that a Bi–National Panel review the final 

determination. A public hearing was 

held on July 20, 2005, in Washington, 

D.C., at which oral arguments were 

presented by the parties. The Panel 

issued a Decision of the Panel on 

January 27, 2006, upholding the 

Department’s determinations with 

respect to TAMSA, but remanding the 

review to the Department with respect 

to Hylsa (i.e., to recalculate Hylsa’s 

packing cost and cost of production 

(‘‘COP’’) on a product–specific basis). 

See In the Matter of: Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from Mexico; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and 

Determination Not to Revoke, USA–

MEX–01–1904–05 (January 27, 2006) 

(‘‘First Decision’’). 

In accordance with the First Decision, 

the Department filed its remand results 

on April 27, 2006. Based on the 

instructions of the Panel, the 

Department recalculated Hylsa’s 

packing and cost of production by 

product costs and calculated a new 

antidumping duty margin of zero for 

Hylsa. The Department then conducted 

a revocation analysis, but found that 

Hylsa did not ship in commercial 

quantities to the U.S. market during the 

time period under consideration and 

found that dumping by Hylsa in the 

ninth administrative review was 

relevant to the determination of whether 

the antidumping duty order was 

otherwise necessary to offset dumping. 

Based on these factors, the Department 

declined to revoke the order. See 

Redetermination on Remand, Oil 

Country Tubular Goods from Mexico: 

Fourth Administrative Review, April 27, 

2006. 

On August 11, 2006, the Panel again 

remanded the decision to the 

Department for further consideration. 

See In the Matter of: Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from Mexico; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and 

Determination Not to Revoke, USA–

MEX–01–1904–05 (August 11, 2006) 

(‘‘Second Decision’’). The Panel rejected 

the Department’s reliance on the results 

of the ninth administrative review and 

also directed the Department to 

reexamine its revocation analysis ‘‘in 

light of the issues raised by the Panel.’’

Id. at 21. In accordance with the Second 

Decision, the Department reexamined 

Hylsa’s request for revocation under 19 

CFR § 351.222(e)(1) and determined that 

Hylsa had not made sales in commercial 

quantities for the three review periods 

under analysis. See Redetermination on 

Remand, Oil Country Tubular Goods 

from Mexico: Fourth Administrative 

Review, October 5, 2006 at 13–16. 

On January 16, 2007, the Panel 

affirmed the Department’s second 

remand redetermination. See In the 

Matter of: Oil Country Tubular Goods 

from Mexico; Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Determination Not to 

Revoke, USA–MEX–01–1904–05 

(January 16, 2007). The Panel issued its 

Notice of Final Panel Action on 

February 2, 2007. On March 14, 2007, 

the NAFTA Secretariat published a 

notice of completion of the panel 

review. See North American Free–Trade 

Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel 

Reviews; Notice of Completion of Panel 

Review, 72 FR 11847 (March 14, 2007). 

The Department also published a notice 

of the NAFTA decision not in harmony 

with the final results of the fourth 

administrative review. See Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from Mexico: Notice of 

NAFTA Panel Decision Not In Harmony 

With Final Results of Administrative 

Review, 72 FR 12761 (March 19, 2007). 

Amendment to Final Results 

We are now amending the final 

results of this administrative review to 

reflect the final decision of the Panel. 

The changes to our calculations with 

respect to Hylsa resulted in a change in 

the weighted–average margin from 0.79 

percent to zero percent for the period of 

review. The Department will instruct 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 

liquidate entries of OCTG from Mexico 

produced by TAMSA and Hylsa at the 

assessment rates the Department 

calculated for these amended final 

results of review. 

Assessment 

The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection 41 days after the 

date of publication of this decision. See 

section 356.8(a) of the Department’s 

regulations. 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR § 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended. 

Dated: April 2, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–6512 Filed 4–5–03; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Minority Business Development 

Agency 

White House Initiative on Asian 

Americans and Pacific Islanders, 

President’s Advisory Commission on 

Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders 

AGENCY: Minority Business 

Development Agency, Department of 

Commerce. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES