alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15912-15913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6138]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-305]


Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. (the licensee) to 
withdraw its April 6, 2006, application for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License No. DPR-43 for the Kewaunee Power Station, 
located in Kewaunee County, Wisconsin.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the facility Updated 
Safety Analysis Report to allow the use of a different methodology for 
determining the design requirements necessary for protecting safety-
related equipment from damage by tornado generated missiles.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on May 23, 2006 
(71 FR 29673). However, by letter dated March 19, 2007, the licensee 
withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated April 6, 2006, and the licensee's 
letter dated March 19, 2007, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 
Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically 
from the Agencywide Documents Access and

[[Page 15913]]

Management Systems (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the 
internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. 
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in 
accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR 
Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by 
e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcacb8ae9cb2aebff2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="50203422103e22337e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of March 2007.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert F. Kuntz,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III-1, Division of Operating 
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
 [FR Doc. E7-6138 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 47480.

#### Protests 868728-G, etc., of DeBoer & Livingston (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the atomizers in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 44140. In accordance therewith the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) was sustained.
1 

### P e r ez, I d a lia

Fr o m: Hi cks

, A u s tin @ ARB < A u s tin.Hi cks@a r b

. ca .g ov> S e nt: T hur s d ay , D ecem b e r 10

, 2015 1 : 58 PM To: Pe r e z , Id a lia S u b j ec t: R e s po n s e s t o Fo ll o w

- u p Q u e s ti o ns

Id alia,

H e r e ar e t h e r e s p o n s e s t o t h e f o l l o w

- up qu e s t i o n s :

P M 1 0 t o PM 2

. 5 c o n v e rs i o n ra t i o – A s r e f e r e n c e d o n pg. B- 6 i n t h e A R B Revi e w o f S an Jo a qu i n V

a lley P M 2

. 5 S t a t e I m p le m e n t a t i on P l an d a te d M a y 2 1
, 2 0 1 5
, s t aff a pp li e d a P M2

. 5 t o P M 1 0 e m iss i o n r a t i o o f 0

. 9 2 t o t h e P M 1 0 t o t als o f e x h a u s t

.

Carl M o y e r P r o g r a m e m i ss i o n r e du c t i o n ca l c u la t i o n s f o r S

- 1 3 0 1

– T h e a nnu al h o u r s o f o p e r a t i o n f o r t h e t w o e ng i n e s w i t h p r o j e c t nu m b e r S

- 1 3 0 1 w e r e p r ov i d e d as 1 8 00 h o u r s

. H o w e v e r, t h e a nnu al h o u rs o f o p e r a t i o n f o r S

- 1 3 0 1 e qu i p m e n t i d e n t ifi e r n u m b e r 3 s h o u l d b e 2 5 0 0 h o u rs

.

Au s t i n H icks
A ir Q u ali ty P la nn i ng a nd S c i e n c e D i v is i o n A ir R e s o u rc e s B o ar d ( 9 1 6 ) 3 2 2

- 8 2 7 9
#### William H. Ellis, *as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v.*The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, *Respondent.*

— Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., dissenting.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50116 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GABRIEL MENDOZA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:11

- CR

- 157

- 1

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gabriel Mendoza appeals the 24

- month and 60

- month prison terms imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the above

- guidelines sentences are procedurally unreasonable. This argument was not raised in the district court, and we will review it only for plain error. See United States v. Kippers , 685 F.3d 4 91, 497 (5th Cir. 2012). To prevail on plain error review, Mendoza must show a forfeited error

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 6, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50116 Document: 00515301395 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2020No. 19

- 50116

2 that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If Mendoza makes such a showing, thi s court has the discretion to correct the error, but only if it “seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. at 135 (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted). Mendoza’s contention that th e district court procedurally erred by failing to adequately explain its sentence s is contradicted by the record. Mendoza asked for within

- guidelines sentence s , and the Government emphasized Mendoza’s substantial history of noncompliance with the conditions of supervised release. Just before imposing Mendoza’s sentence s , t he district court stated that it was taking that substantial history into account. Although the district court did not expressly discuss the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, the record indicates that it considered them, and in any event, “implicit consideration of the § 3553 factors is generally sufficient , ” Kippers , 685 F.3d at 498 (internal q uotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted). Thus, Mendoza has failed to show clear or obvious error. See Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135. Further, he has not shown that any deficiency in the explanation affected his substantial rights, as he has not shown that a more detailed explanation would have resulted in lower sentence s

. See United States v. Whitelaw , 580 F.3d 256,
2 64

- 65 (5th Cir. 2009)

. AFFIRMED. Case: 19-50116 Document: 00515301395 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/06/2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT MITAL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 269 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 13.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Silver Trust (the "Trust") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Rostowsky, Principal Financial Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the Manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.






This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.




Date: June 24, 2011








/s/ Steven Rostowsky


Steven Rostowsky


Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

          - 12 CFR Parts 611, 612, 614, 615, 618, 619, 620, and 630 
          - RIN 3052-AC19 

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# ACTION:

Announcement of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final rule under parts 611, 612, 614, 615, 618, 619, 620, and 630 on February 2, 2006. This final rule amended our regulations affecting the governance of the Farm Credit System and became effective on April 5, 2006 (71 FR 18168, April 11, 2006), except for the amendments to §§ 611.210(a)(2), 611.220(a)(2)(i) and (ii), 611.325, and 620.21(d)(2). This document announces the effective date of those delayed portions of the rule. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

The effective date for the amendments to §§ 611.210(a)(2), 611.220(a)(2)(i) and (ii), 611.325, and 620.21(d)(2), published February 2, 2006, at 71 FR 5740, is April 5, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gary Van Meter, Deputy Director, Office of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4232, TTY (703) 883-4434; or Laura D. McFarland, Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TTY (703) 883-4020. 

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

Dated: April 2, 2007. 

Roland E. Smith, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. E7-6357 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
<PAGE>







                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (the "Registration
Statement") of (1) our reports dated February 5, 2001 relating to the financial
statements of Separate Account Nos. 195, 197 and 198 of The Equitable Life
Assurance Society of the United States, (2) our reports dated February 5, 2001
relating to the consolidated financial statements of The Equitable Life
Assurance Society of the United States, and (3) our reports relating to the
financial statements of the following funds established under the Declaration of
Trust of the State Street Bank and Trust Company Investment Funds for Tax Exempt
Retirement Plans: Lifecycle Fund Group Trust - Conservative (report dated March
16, 2001), Lifecycle Group Trust - Moderate (report dated March 16, 2001), S&P
500 Flagship Fund and S&P 500 Flagship Non-Lending Fund (formerly "S&P 500 Index
Fund with Futures") (Combined Financial Statements) (report dated February 9,
2001), Russell 2000 Index Securities Lending Fund (formerly "Russell 2000 Fund")
and Russell 2000 Index Fund (formerly "Russell 2000 Non-Lending Fund") (Combined
Financial Statements) (report dated February 2, 2001), Daily EAFE Securities
Lending Fund (report dated March 2, 2001), Daily MSCI Europe Index Securities
Lending Fund and Daily MSCI Europe Index Fund (Combined Financial Statements)
(report dated February 23, 2001), Daily MSCI Japan Index Securities Lending Fund
and Daily MSCI Japan Index Fund (Combined Financial Statements) (report dated
February 23, 2001), Daily MSCI Pacific Basin ex-Japan Index Securities Lending
Fund and Daily MSCI Pacific Basin ex-Japan Index Fund (Combined Financial
Statements) (report dated February 23, 2001), Government Corporate Bond Fund
(formerly "Daily Government/Corporate Bond Fund") (report dated March 9, 2001),
and Short Term Investment Fund (report dated February 2, 2001). We also consent
to the use in the Prospectus Supplement constituting part of this Registration
Statement of our report dated February 5, 2001 relating to the financial
statements of Separate Account No. 4 of The Equitable Life Assurance Society of
the United States. We also consent to the references to us under the headings
"Condensed Financial Information" and "About Our Independent Accountants" in
such Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
April 27, 2001
CITY OF PELICAN 

P.O. Box 737 ·Pelican, Alaska 99832 · (907) 735-2202 ·Fax (907) 735-2258 

l f) -I b - 2.0 ) Lf 

j)(;.7 - cs7- ~co 2-

I/>' g6 

Order 2011-3-11, issued 3-9-2011, selected Alaska Seaplane Service, LLC. (Alaska Seaplanes) to provide 

EAS for an annual subsidy of $185,721 at Pelican from June 1, 2011 through January 31, 2015. 

On 9-22-2014, Order 2014-9-13 issued a "Request for Proposals" to provide "service at Elfin Cove, 

Pelican, Angoon, and Tenakee, with or without subsidy, for a new contract beginning February 1, 2015." 

The order further states that, "The community and air carriers are encouraged to work together in 

advance of the due date for proposals to craft a service pattern that is desirable to the community and 

meets the operational needs of the airlines." 

Order 2014-9-13 includes the following footnote: 

"

1 Harris Aircraft Services (Harris Air) currently provides non-EAS air service from Angoon, 

Pelican, and Tenakee to Sitka (SIT) than meets frequency minimums for EAS. Harris Air also has 

an application with the Department for a certificate of public convenience and necessity. If 

Harris Air's application is approved, we may revisit the need for requesting proposals at those 

three locations. The purpose of the EAS program is to ensure that communities have air service 

access where there would not otherwise be access. If Harris Air, as a certificated carrier, is 

providing subsidy-free EAS, the need for subsidized EAS is moot." 

In a letter dated 9-26-2014, City of Angoon Mayor Matthew Kookesh states: 

This statement is alarming because it threatens Angoon's longstanding and important essential 

air service between our community and Juneau-Angoon's most important destination-in 

favor of less frequent service to an inferior destination. 

At present, the City of Pelican has tailored EAS service provided by Alaska Seaplanes from Juneau to 

Pelican. Juneau is our hub community with a greater percentage of transportation transiting through 

Juneau. And for eight months of the year flight service from Juneau to Pelican exists primarily because 

of the EAS program. 

I did write a letter in support of Harris Air Service application for an Air Carrier Certificate, which will 

allow for an improved schedule and the transport of mail for the U.S. Postal Service. However, I saw this 

as an opportunity to provided expanded air service between Sitka and Pelican for additional passenger 

traffic meant to augment air travel in and out of Pelican not reduce the important level of EAS air service 

that routinely occurs with Alaska Seaplanes between Juneau and Pelican. 

The EAS program and the City of Pelican, Alaska's existing air service is crucial to vital to our community. 

Without which our options for sustainable development are severely limited. Thank you for your time. 

Sincerely, , . 

?~r~ Patricia Phillips 

Mayor 

Cc: US Senator Lisa Murkowski 

US Senator Mark Begich 

US Rep. Don Young
Case No. 6,828.

#### The HUDSON.

[Cited in The Henry Ewbank, Case No. 0.376. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7


                      PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

                  EXECUTIVE LIFE INSURANCE PLAN - SUMMARY

1.       The Plan covers certain PLP employees as designated by PLP. Employees
         may be added to the Plan at the discretion of PLP.

2.       The Plan provides a life insurance death benefit to participating
         employees by means of an individual life insurance policy.

3.       The individual policy is issued to replace the PLP group term life
         insurance in an amount equal to the scheduled amount of group life for
         which employees are eligible.

4.       Additional individual policies may be added periodically or additional
         amounts of insurance for which employees are eligible may be acquired
         under the group life plan subject to underwriting approval which may be
         required by the insurance companies.

5.       PLP will pay all premiums on the executive life policies; that portion
         of the premium that represents the economic value of the current life
         insurance protection which the employee receives will be taxable as
         income to the employee according to IRS regulations.

6.       The employee will have the right to designate a personal beneficiary of
         the death proceeds of the policy.

7.       PLP will also have an interest in the policy equal to the policy's cash
         value.

8.       If the employee dies while the Plan is in effect, PLP will be entitled
         to receive its interest from the policy proceeds. The remainder of the
         policy proceeds will be paid to the beneficiary who has been named in
         the policy.

9.       In the event of disability, the Plan will continue in full force with
         premiums continuing to be paid by PLP until the employee reaches age
         sixty-five (65).

10.      Upon retirement or other termination of employment or upon termination
         of the Executive Life Insurance Plan for any reason, PLP may recover
         its interest in the policy cash values and will transfer the policy to
         the employee subject to any policy loan or make any other disposition
         of the policy as may be agreed to between PLP and the employee.
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42 44



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Otto Fletcher, CEO of Silver Screen Studios, Inc., pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.)

I, Otto Fletcher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silver Screen
Studios, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors:
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 12, 2005

By:/s/ Otto Fletcher
--------------------
Otto Fletcher, acting CEO and a acting Director
EXHIBIT 10.2

                            Agreement to Joint Filing

                       The Shell Petroleum Company Limited

The  undersigned  agrees that  Amendment  No. 1 to the  Schedule 13D executed by
Shell Capital  Limited to which this Agreement to Joint Filing is attached as an
exhibit is filed on behalf of The Shell Petroleum  Company  Limited  pursuant to
Rule 13d-1(k)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Dated:  April 27, 2001


                                                  THE SHELL PETROLEUM
                                                  COMPANY LIMITED

                                                  By:/s/Jyoti Eruch Munsiff
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Name:   Jyoti Eruch Munsiff
                                                     Title:  Company Secretary