alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8658 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 535
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8658

                          [Report No. 118-638]

 To require a report by the Transportation Security Administration on 
          digital identity ecosystems, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2024

   Mr. Higgins of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

                            August 30, 2024

                     Additional sponsor: Mr. Foster

                            August 30, 2024

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require a report by the Transportation Security Administration on 
          digital identity ecosystems, and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emerging Digital Identity Ecosystem 
Report Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. TSA REPORT ON DIGITAL IDENTITY ECOSYSTEMS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration 
shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs of the Senate a report describing the current state of digital 
identity ecosystems and the homeland security value of emerging digital 
identity ecosystems in the transportation sector, including related 
benefits and risks, and how such current and emerging ecosystems may 
better protect homeland security and increase the competitive advantage 
of the United States. Such report shall, to the maximum extent 
practicable, include perspectives from the private sector and State, 
local, Tribal, and territorial governments relating thereto.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 535

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 8658

                          [Report No. 118-638]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To require a report by the Transportation Security Administration on 
          digital identity ecosystems, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            August 30, 2024

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
(Reap. Dec. 9214)

#### F. D. Pitts Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 14487.

(Decided August 22, 1958)

*F. D. Pitts*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Murray Sklarojf,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is stipulated and agreed by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at $15.00 per pound, less the following charges:

> Rupees-India

> Cartage charges 2-0-0

> Railway freight 3-0-0

> Shipping charges packed 20-0-0

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value as defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, for such or similar merchandise, at the time of exportation thereof.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted for decision upon the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was $15 per pound, less the following charges:

> Rupees-India

> Cartage charges 2-0-0

> Railway freight 3-0-0

> Shipping charges packed 20-0-0

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2007183EN.01001101.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 June 2007 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf, Germany) — Euro Tex Textilverwertung GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg

(Case C-56/06) (1)

1

(Association between the European Communities and their Member States and the Republic of Poland - Concept of ‘originating products’ - Used clothing)

(2007/C 183/17)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Euro Tex Textilverwertung GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of Article 7(1)(b) of Protocol 4 to the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Poland, of the other part — Protocol 4 concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation (OJ 1993 L 348, p. 2), as amended by Decision No 1/97 of the Association Council, Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Poland, of the other part, of 30 June 1997 (OJ 1997 L 221, p. 1) — Concept of ‘originating products’ — Determination of the origin of used items of clothing which have been separated and sorted within the Community

Operative part of the judgment

Since Article 7(1)(b) of Protocol 4 to the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Poland, of the other part, as amended by Decision No 1/97 of the Association Council, Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Poland, of the other part, of 30 June 1997 does not make it possible to draw a distinction between simple and more complex matching operations, matching operations such as those described in the order for reference are covered by the concept of simple operations of matching for the purposes of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Norcross Safety Products L.L.C. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Peterson, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: November 8, 2007 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT A. PETERSON                          |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Robert A. Peterson                              |
|                    |   | President, Chief  Executive Officer and Manager |
|                    |   | (Principal Executive  Officer)                  |

 

**A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will beretained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2








In connection with the Annual Report of Nano Labs Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Bernardo Camacho Chavarria, the Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer andDirectorof the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.






February 25, 2014
By:
/s/ Bernardo Camacho ChavarriaBernardo Camacho Chavarria,Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer

Director
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Christian Brule, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sunergy, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sunergy, Inc.



Date:  May 14, 2007

By:  ____________________________________



Christian Brule, President, Chief Executive Officer



and principal executive officer
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




Exhibit 10(a)  


April 19, 2001 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 201 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 


Directors:



    We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 4
to the registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-60149) filed by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 













Sincerely,

SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

By: /s/ DAVID S. GOLDSTEIN  








David S. Goldstein
Case No. 9,150.

#### In re MARTIN.

[6 Ben. 20.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

April, 1872.

Bankruptcy — Erroneous Adjudication — Co-partnership.

On the petition and schedules of one member of a copartnership, an adjudication of bankruptcy of the firm was made. It appeared that neither of the other members of the firm had consented to the adjudication of bankruptcy, and that they had no place of business within, and resided out of. the district where the petition was filed: *Eeld,*that the adjudication as to the other members of the firm was erroneous, as the court was without jurisdiction as against them, and that as to them such adjudication must be vacated, but should be allowed to stand as to the petitioning member.

On the 16th of March, 1872, on the petition and schedules of Henry Martin, a member of the firm of Martin, Vaughan & Co., the adjudication of bankruptcy of said firm was signed by the register to whom the case was referred, under a misapprehension of the facts as to Vaughan and Montgomery, the other members of the firm. On a subsequent examination of the petition and schedules, it appeared that there was no evidence that either Vaughan or Montgomery had consented to the adjudication of bankruptcy of the firm; that they had no place of business in the district, and resided out of the district; and that the debts were all contracted prior to January 1st, 1869. The register thereupon, on the same day, of his own motion, made an order setting aside the said adjudication, without notice to the attorney for the petitioner, and, on March 18th, the following Monday, made an adjudication of bankruptcy of said Henry Martin individually. The petitioner thereupon moved that the order setting aside the adjudication of March 16th, and the adjudication of March 18th, be vacated. The register certified the above facts to the court, with his opinion that the adjudication of the firm of Martin, Vaughan & Co. was erroneous, and that Vaughan and Montgomery were entitled to be heard before being adjudged bankrupts.

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The adjudication of March 16th, 1872, as to Vaughan and Montgomery, was erroneous, as the court was without jurisdiction as to them. I direct an order to be entered vacating such adjudication as to them, but allowing it to stand as to Martin alone. In order to prevent any possible embarrassment, the order had better provide that the register’s order setting aside the adjudication of March 16th be vacated, and that the adjudication of March 18th be vacated.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Protect Pharmaceutical Corporation. (the “Company”) for the period
ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Una Taylor, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



Date:
February 27, 2019



|By: | /s/
    UNA TAYLOR                 | 
|--- | ---------------------------------- | 
|    | Una
    Taylor                     | 
|    | Chief
    Executive Officer        | 
|    | (Principal
    Accounting Officer) |
1 Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 5:28 PM To: Brunner, Christine Subject: FW: EO 12866 Comments on EPA Tier 3 draft final rul e (2060-AQ86) Attachments: EO_12866_ Tier 3_Final_Rule_Summary_CommentsV3_2_21 _2014.docx



### Please docket

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 5:22 PM To: Sargeant, Kathryn Subject: EO 12866 Comments on EPA Tier 3 draft final rule ( 2060-AQ86)



### Kathryn, Attached are some of the EO 12866 interagency c omments on the Tier 3 draft final rule (2060-AQ86). I will send any others as soon as possible. Regards, Chad
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monitronics International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael R. Meyers, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Michael R. MeyersMichael R. MeyersChief Financial Officer and Vice President




Date: May 12, 2005
# C_2007150EN.01000101.xml

| 4.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

4,07 % on 1 July 2007

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 July 2007

(2007/C 150/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3601 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 166,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4416 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67510 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2373 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6550 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 84,46 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9380 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5838 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,777 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7562 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,1254 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,584 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7606 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5902 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4380 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6265 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7384 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0722 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 248,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4907 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3291 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3105 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 261,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6876 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,293 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,9360 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,258 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3601

JPY

Japanese yen

166,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4416

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67510

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2373

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6550

ISK

Iceland króna

84,46

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9380

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5838

CZK

Czech koruna

28,777

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7562

RON

Romanian leu

3,1254

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,584

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7606

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5902

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4380

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6265

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7384

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0722

KRW

South Korean won

1 248,50

ZAR

South African rand

9,4907

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3291

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3105

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 261,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6876

PHP

Philippine peso

62,293

RUB

Russian rouble

34,9360

THB

Thai baht

43,258

---

(1)

1

Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
<pre>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of RPM Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31. 2003 (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: April 30, 2004

By:  /S/ RANDY ZYCH
-------------------------
RANDY ZYCH
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)



Dated: April 30, 2004


By:  /S/ DAVID LADE
---------------------------
David Lade
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Marcus E. Jundt, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kona Grill, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                       /s/ MARCUS E. JUNDT   Marcus E. Jundt   *Chief Executive Officer*   Date: August 2, 2007
#### Hannah Mead *v.*Lucretia C. Smith.

— Motion for reargument granted, with ten dollars costs to abide event.