alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Sloneem, Petitioner *v.*Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, Respondent.

Argued June 5, 1981,

before Judges Mencer, Craig and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three.

*Joseph Sloneem,*petitioner, for himself.

*Garolann Ashham,*Legal Assistant, with her, *Jean E. Graybill,*Counsel, for respondent.

August 12, 1981:

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Petitioner Joseph Sloneem questions an order of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) affirming a decision of the Columbia County Board of Assistance (CCBA) to discontinue petitioner’s cash assistance and to decrease his food stamp benefits because of his income from employment.

After his appeal to this court from the DPW determination, the petitioner on April 3,1981 acknowledged by his signature that the chief clerk had notified him *241of the date, time and place set for argument of the matter before us. The petitioner failed to appear for oral argument, however, and our chief clerk’s records disclose no request by the petitioner to submit the case on briefs.

Consequently pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 2314, we dismiss the case for the petitioner’s failure to proceed according to rule.

Even if we were to consider the case on the merits, we would affirm. By accepting full-time employment on a basis exceeding the 100 hours per month limit stated in 55 Pa. Code §153.44(d) (1), the petitioner was disqualified from eligibility as a recipient of cash benefits specifically provided for families whose dependent children are deprived of support because of a parent’s unemployment.

The fact that the petitioner was discharged before he actually worked 100 hours is irrelevant. When the CCBA verified his employment in anticipation of the subsequent benefit payment date, and notified him of the resulting decrease in assistance, the CCBA reasonably could have expected the petitioner’s employment to continue. His subsequent dismissal did not retroactively change his status within the meaning of the statute.1

Order

And Now, August 12, 1981, the appeal of the petitioner in the above captioned case is dismissed pursuant to Pa. E.A.P. 2314.

1

 Of particular relevance is the fact that, as required under 45 C.F.R. §233.21 (a), Pennsylvania elected as its budgeting method for assistance payments:

> *Prospective budgeting,*in which all factors of eligibility in the amount of the assistance payment are determined with respect to the month for which the assistance payment is made; the action is based on the agency’s best estimates of income and circumstances which will exist in that month.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:11-cr-292

Nathaniel Lee 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 29) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 2 of the superseding

indictment, and he is hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The

court will defer the decision of whether to accept the plea

agreement until the sentencing hearing.

Date: March 26, 2012 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cr-00292-EAS-NMK Doc #: 30 Filed: 03/26/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Frederick Vandenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Destiny Media Technologies, Inc. for
  the year ended August 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
  the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of Destiny Media Technologies, Inc. (the Company)



| | By:    | /s/ Fred Vandenberg    
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Frederick Vandenberg   
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | November 29, 2010      



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on
  Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
  10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
  except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 10934, as amended (the
  Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated
  by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
  the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
  it by reference.

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

SBH Services & CORE Construction

 J/V II, LLC

)

)

ASBCA No. 63442

)

Under Contract No. W912QR-14-C-0001 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Jon M. DeVore, Esq.

 Birch Horton Bittner & Cherot, P.C.

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

James M. Inman, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorney

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: May 2, 2024

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63442, Appeal of SBH 

Services & CORE Construction J/V II, LLC, rendered in conformance with the 

Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 2, 2024

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
No. 56508.

protests 164740-K, etc. (New York).

#### Carolina Manufacturing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
#### Commonwealth *v.*Smondrowski, Appellant.

Submitted May 5, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*William J. Brady,*for appellant.

*634
      *James D. Crawford,*Assistant District Attorney, *Richard A. Sprague,*First Assistant District Attorney, and *Arlen Specter,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

June 27, 1969:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed. Cf. Act of March 31, 1860, P. L. 427, §20, 19 P.S. §351; *Commonwealth ex rel. Stevens v. Myers,*398 Pa. 23, 156 A. 2d 527 (1959); and, *Commonwealth v. Bruno,*316 Pa. 394, 175 Atl. 518 (1934).
#### Alvin Barry, *as President, etc., Respondent, v.*Orrin B. Crandall, Appellant.

Order appealed from affirmed.
Before the Third Division,

May 5, 1949

No. 53106.

#### Chong Kee Jan & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 796929-G, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following.the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KEYVAN PARSA,

Appellant

,

vs

.

ALBERT FLORES, MONTOYA PARK

PLACE, INC., AND WESTSTAR TITLE,

LLC, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00239

- CV

Appeal from the

327 th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2020DCV2997)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction without prejudice. We therefore dismiss the appeal without

prejudice. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022.

GINA M. PALAFOX

, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
#### The People *ex rel.*Frederick S. Heiser, Ex'r, etc., *v.*Edward Gilon *et al.,*Board of Assessors, etc.

No papers.

Motion to vacate order dismissing appeal granted on payment of ten dollars.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8733 

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to direct the 

Secretary of Health and Human Services to include data on animal 

abuse in the national clearinghouse for information relating to child 

abuse and neglect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2024 

Ms. KUSTER (for herself and Mr. VAN DREW) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act 

to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to include data on animal abuse in the national clearinghouse for information relating to child abuse and neglect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child and Animal 

5 Abuse Detection and Reporting Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8733 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF DATA ON ANIMAL ABUSE IN NA2 TIONAL CLEARINGHOUSE FOR INFORMATION 

3 RELATING TO CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT. 

4 Section 103(b)(6) of the Child Abuse Prevention and 

5 Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 5104(b)(6)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

7 the end; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (C), by adding ‘‘and’’ at 

9 the end; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(D) the incidence of any such cases re12 lated to animal abuse (including any act or fail13 ure to act, which results in undue pain, suf14 fering, or death to any animal, without regard 

15 to whether such act or failure to act is a viola16 tion of State or local cruelty law);’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 2, 2022 No. 04-22-00028-CR Matthew ROSE , Appellant
v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CRW1910200 Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On May 26, 2022, appellant’s counsel filed a motion to abate and a request for the appointment of another attorney to represent appellant. On May 27, 2022, the trial court clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record, which includes an order signed by the trial court on May 26, 2022, that substituted John Michael Lamerson as appellant’s counsel. In light of the substitution, the pending motion is DENIED AS MOOT. Appellant’s brief is currently due on or before June 15, 2022

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of June, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document



Exhibit 10(b)

  


  
 



 Consent of Independent Accountants

    
  




We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-41577) of our report dated March 1, 2001, relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the use in
this Registration Statement of our report dated March 22, 2001, on our audits of the financial statements of Variable Annuity Account A of Protective Life, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.






PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, Alabama

April 30, 2001











QuickLinks


Consent of Independent Accountants
Exhibit 12.1
 Certification by the Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of RDA Microelectronics, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [intentionally omitted];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Vincent TaiName: Vincent TaiTitle:   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 19, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00735

- CV

Brian C. SIMCOE

, Appella nt

v.

Thomas Christopher and Catrina Christ

Thomas CHRISTOPHER and Catrina Christopher,

Appellee s

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 15519

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presidi ng



### ORDER

The Appellee ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to April 6, 2015.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Sarah Lishman

Jamie Graham & Associates, PLLC

Tower Life Building

3110 S. St. Mary's, Suite 845

San Antonio, TX 78205

James Rodriguez

Law Office of James A. Rodri guez

540 S Saint Marys St

San Antonio, TX 78205

- 3418 Jamie L. Graham

Jamie Graham & Associates, PLLC

Tower Life Building

310 S. St. Mary's St., Suite 845

San Antonio, TX 78205
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8868 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in Greenland, New 

Hampshire, as the ‘‘Chief Michael Maloney Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 8868 EH

1 SECTION 1. CHIEF MICHAEL MALONEY POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in 

5 Greenland, New Hampshire, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chief Michael Maloney 

12 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8868 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postchael Maloney Post Office Building’’. Greenland, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Chief Mi- al Service located at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 852 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 852

    To direct the Attorney General to establish a grant program for 
                civilian traffic violation enforcement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2023

    Mr. Torres of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
  Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Attorney General to establish a grant program for 
                civilian traffic violation enforcement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Investing in Safer Traffic Stops Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. GRANT FOR CIVILIAN TRAFFIC VIOLATION ENFORCEMENT.

    (a) Establishment.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall establish a civilian 
traffic violation enforcement grant program (in this Act referred to as 
the ``Program'') to provide funding to local, State, or Tribal 
government entities to ensure that the enforcement of traffic 
violations is carried out by a civilian or traffic monitoring 
technology, instead of a law enforcement officer.
    (b) Eligible Recipient.--The Attorney General shall make grants 
under the Program to local, State, or Tribal government entities.
    (c) Eligible Activities.--Amounts from a grant awarded under the 
Program may only be used for the purposes of ensuring that the 
enforcement of traffic violations is carried out by a civilian or 
traffic monitoring technology, including for the purchasing of such 
technology and the hiring of civilians.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $100,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2024 through 
2029 to carry out the Program.
    (e) Civilian Defined.--In this Act, the term ``civilian'' means an 
individual employed by a local, State, or Tribal government entity to 
enforce traffic laws, who is not a law enforcement officer.
                                 <all>
```
Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

Byron White United States Courthouse

1823 Stout Street

Denver, Colorado 80257

(303) 844-3157

February 26, 2018

Chris Wolpert

Chief Deputy Clerk 

Mr. Gregory Don Steinman

Madison, Harbour & Mroz, P.A. 

P.O. Box 25467

Albuquerque, NM 87102

RE: 17-2006, 17-2010, First Mercury Insurance v. Cincinnati Insurance

Dist/Ag docket: 1:14-CV-01052-WJ-LAM

Dear Counsel: 

Enclosed is a copy of the opinion of the court issued today in this matter. The court has 

entered judgment on the docket pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 36.

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 40, any petition for rehearing must be filed within 14 

days after entry of judgment. Please note, however, that if the appeal is a civil case in 

which the United States or its officer or agency is a party, any petition for rehearing must 

be filed within 45 days after entry of judgment. Parties should consult both the Federal 

Rules and local rules of this court with regard to applicable standards and requirements. 

In particular, petitions for rehearing may not exceed 15 pages in length, and no answer is 

permitted unless the court enters an order requiring a response. If requesting rehearing en 

banc, the requesting party must file 6 paper copies with the clerk, in addition to satisfying 

all Electronic Case Filing requirements. See Fed. R. App. P. Rules 35 and 40, and 10th 

Cir. R. 35 and 40 for further information governing petitions for rehearing.

Appellate Case: 17-2006 Document: 01019949783 Date Filed: 02/26/2018 Page: 1 
2

Please contact this office if you have questions.

Sincerely,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of the Court 

cc: Tim L. Fields

Elizabeth A. Martinez

Nathan T. Nieman

EAS/lab

Appellate Case: 17-2006 Document: 01019949783 Date Filed: 02/26/2018 Page: 2
ANTONELLI 

Drone!UAS Practice Group 

U.S. Oepartment of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

L A W -,~~.,_,_"''""''-"" 

35 E Wacker Drive 

~SUite:~t875 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Tel. 312.201.8310 

Jeffrey(£ji.Antonelli-La\v.coin 

July 25, 2016 

Re: Amendment to Kovar & Associates LLC Exemption No. 11905 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1331 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Kovar & Associates LLC ("Kovar & Associates") requests an amendment to Exemption 

No. 11905 for the purpose updating their address. The new address is: 

Kovar & Associates, LLC 

38 Cross Rd. 

Exeter, NH 03833 

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this 

document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 312-201-8310 or via email at Jeffrey@AntonelliLaw.com. 

~. 

1 

Attorneys for Kov 

. ' 

'elia R. Niemi 

·Associates LLC
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5986]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55491A; File No. SR-CBOE-2006-95]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, 
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval 
of Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto 
to List for Trading Options on the Vanguard[supreg] Emerging Markets 
Exchange Traded Fund

March 26, 2007.

Correction

    FR Doc. E7-5423, issued on March 26, 2007 on page 14145, regarding 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-55491, incorrectly cited the 
date of the release as March 19, 2006. The date should read March 19, 
2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-5986 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P