alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007160EN.01001401.xml

| 13.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/14

---

Amendment to Notice of competition EPSO/AD/95/07

(Official Journal of the European Union C 103 A of 8 May 2007)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 103 A of 8 May 2007)

(2007/C 160/06)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

| — | EPSO/AD/95/07 — Administrators (AD5) in the field of Information Sciences (Library/Documentation) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/95/07 — Administrators (AD5) in the field of Information Sciences (Library/Documentation)

EPSO/AD/95/07 — Administrators (AD5) in the field of Information Sciences (Library/Documentation)

For admission to the competition you must have completed a three-year university course in this field or have completed a three-year university course and have a specialist qualification in this field.

No professional experience is required.

The competition notice is published in English, French and German only. Full details can be found on the EPSO website http://europa.eu/epso in all three languages.

This notice of competition and the information notice in the 19 other language versions were published in the English, French and German editions of the Official Journal of 8 May 2007.

To make the information more widely available, the appointing authority has decided to publish this information notice in the 19 other language versions of this Official Journal and consequently to re-open the deadline for the submission of applications. The new closing date will be 14 August 2007.

The re-opening of the application period does not in any way affect the position of those candidates who are already registered.

Save as indicated above, the original notices of competition remain unchanged. In particular, the admission criteria continue to be those laid down in this notice: anyone who takes advantage of the re-opening of the time-limit to make a first application must check that they met those conditions at the closing date mentioned in the original competition notice (i.e. 7 June 2007).

IMPORTANT: candidates whose application has already been registered at the date of publication of this notice may not apply again. This applies not only to candidates who have already sat the test, but also to candidates who have applied but have not sat the test.

IMPORTANT: candidates whose application has already been registered at the date of publication of this notice may not apply again. This applies not only to candidates who have already sat the test, but also to candidates who have applied but have not sat the test.

Full details can be found on the EPSO website.

---
## St at e of Ne w York Supre me Court , Appe llat e D i vi s i on T h i rd J udi cial D e

part me n t Decided and Entered: December 15, 2016 522978

________________________________ In the Matter of CARL MACEDONIO, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

________________________________ Calendar Date: October 25, 2016 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

__________ Carl Macedonio, Ossining, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account.-2- 522978

In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ballard v Racette, 140 AD3d 1428, 1428 [2016]). McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
(Reap. Dec. 8889)

Entry No. 875132.

#### Filjay Imports *v.*United States

(Decided June 25, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchan*558dise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the entered unit values less the addition made under duress to meet the advances by the Appraiser.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the entered unit values, less the addition made under duress to meet the advances by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Order entered December 19, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-01043-CR

JOSEPH DEAN FISHER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-00307-422-F

ORDER

On November 2, 2022, we ordered appellant to file his brief by November 

30, 2022. On November 30, 2022, supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records 

were filed on appellant’s motion to suppress. Accordingly, we ORDER

appellant’s brief be filed by JANUARY 17, 2023. If appellant fails to file his brief 

by January 17, 2023, the Court may abate this case for a hearing in the trial court to 

determine why the brief has not been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).
/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
#### Koscherak Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7503.

Entry Nos. 726117; 744740.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England, October 1945, etc.

Certified October 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 7, 1945, etc.

(Decided January 13, 1948)

*Siegel, Mandell and Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in the reappraisements listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export values of the merchandise are the values found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importers by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the British purchase tax, so-called.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# son Inventory Expert Service

A division of the American Chemical Society Phone: 800-631-1884, 614-447-3870 Fax: 614-447-3747 E-mail: answers@cas.org Web: www.cas.org/products/clientl



## INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PNIlJ.



### If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. Please make the same correction(s) to your PNIIQ 

### before submitting it to the EPA.

CAS • 2540 Olentangy River Road • P.O. Box 3343 • Columbus, Ohio 43210-0334 • USA
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17575-17576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3274-EM]


Indiana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Indiana (FEMA-3274-EM), dated March 12, 2007, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal

[[Page 17576]]

Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Indiana is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration 
of March 12, 2007:

    Adams, Allen, DeKalb, Hancock, Hendricks, Howard Huntington, 
LaGrange, LaPorte, Stark, St. Joseph, and Whitley Counties for 
emergency protective measures (Category B), including snow removal, 
under the Public Assistance program for any continuous 48-hour 
period during or proximate to the incident period.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management and Director of FEMA.
[FR Doc. E7-6579 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
EXHIBIT 32.2








In connection with the Annual Report of Nano Labs Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Bernardo Camacho Chavarria, the Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer andDirectorof the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.






April 23, 2014
By:
/s/ Bernardo Camacho ChavarriaBernardo Camacho Chavarria,Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer

Director
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
 **RULE
13a-15d-15(e) and 15d-15(e) CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Pierre
Elliott, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Diamond Powersports, Inc. (the
“Company”).
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The
Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15d-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
 
 (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidates subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s
auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
April 15, 2005
 By:  /s/
Pierre Elliott
 Pierre
Elliott, Chief Executive Officer
No. 64272.

protests 58/17778 and 58/17779 (Rochester).

#### Associated Customhouse Brokers *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower*& *Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted), I, Claudio Gianascio, Chief Executive Officer
and  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to
the best of his or her knowledge:
 
 1. The Company's Amended Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31,  2007, and
to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "PERIODIC REPORT")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in
the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report
and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic
Report.
 
 Dated:
September 27, 2008
 
 
 S/ Claudio
Gianascio
 Claudio
Gianascio
 CEO &
CFO
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Oranco, Inc. and will be retained by Oranco, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
 
 THIS
CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED "FILED" BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF
SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6796

ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a 

Kweli, a/k/a Justice,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

AULL; BECKETT, JR.; T. ESTERLINE; JAMES PARRISH,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 19-6824

ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a 

Kweli, a/k/a Justice,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

AULL; BECKETT, JR.; T. ESTERLINE; JAMES PARRISH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge; Paige Jones Gossett, Magistrate 

Judge. (0:18-cv-01418-CMC-PJG)
2

Submitted: October 15, 2019 Decided: October 17, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Louis Garrett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Robert Louis Garrett, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for a preliminary 

injunction and denying his motion to alter or amend; the district court’s order affirming the 

magistrate judge’s order and allowing Garrett until June 25, 2019, to file any motion to 

amend or supplement his complaint; the magistrate judge’s order dismissing as moot 

Garrett’s motion to compel and for sanctions, motion to stay, two motions to supplement 

the motion to compel and for sanctions, and Defendants’ motion for extension of time; and 

the magistrate judge’s order denying Garrett’s motions to appoint counsel. This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen 

v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The denial of Garrett’s 

motion for a preliminary injunction is an appealable interlocutory order. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292(a)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the denial of the 

preliminary injunction or motion to reconsider. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Garrett v. Aull, No. 0:18-cv-01418-CMC-PJG (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 

2019 & May 30, 2019). The remaining three orders are neither final orders nor appealable 

interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeals for 

lack of jurisdiction.

AFFIRMED IN PART,

DISMISSED IN PART
May 3, 1946

No. 51097.

Suit 4509.

#### United *States*v. *Somerset Importers, Ltd.*

C. D. 909 affirmed March 4, 1946. C. A. D. 328.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as**

**Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Dated: February 25, 2011 

Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Barry Thomas, CEO of Silver Screen Studios, Inc., pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.)

I, Barry Thomas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silver Screen
Studios, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 12, 2006
By: /s/ Barry Thomas
    ----------------
Barry Thomas, CEO and Director