18184 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

• Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

C. Docket Copying Costs 

You may be charged a reasonable fee 

for photocopying docket materials, as 

provided in 40 CFR part 2. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

This action is not a significant 

regulatory action and was therefore not 

submitted to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review. 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not impose an 

information collection burden under the 

PRA. The changes made to the 

regulations as a result of this action 

impose no new or different reporting 

requirements on regulated parties. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

I certify that this action will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the RFA. In making this 

determination, the impact of concern is 

any significant adverse economic 

impact on small entities. An agency may 

certify that a rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities if 

the rule relieves regulatory burden, has 

no net burden or otherwise has a 

positive economic effect on the small 

entities subject to the rule. This action 

clarifies the data sources and 

methodology used by EPA to establish 

the CWC price, establishes these prices 

for 2014 and 2015, and reinserts 

inadvertently overwritten regulatory 

language. The impacts of the RFS2 

program on small entities were already 

addressed in the RFS2 final rule 

promulgated on March 26, 2010 (75 FR 

14670), and this rule will not impose 

any additional requirements on small 

entities beyond those already analyzed. 

We have therefore concluded that this 

action will have no net regulatory 

burden for all directly regulated small 

entities. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This action does not contain any 

unfunded mandate as described in 

UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does 

not significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. This action implements 

mandate(s) specifically and explicitly 

set forth in Clean Air Act section 211(o) 

without the exercise of any policy 

discretion by the EPA. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the states, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the states, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175. This rule will be 

implemented at the Federal level and 

potentially impacts gasoline, diesel, and 

renewable fuel producers, importers, 

distributors, and marketers. Tribal 

governments would be affected only to 

the extent they purchase and use 

regulated fuels. Thus, Executive Order 

13175 does not apply to this action. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

The EPA interprets EO 13045 as 

applying only to those regulatory 

actions that concern environmental 

health or safety risks that the EPA has 

reason to believe may 

disproportionately affect children, per 

the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory 

action’’ in section 2–202 of the 

Executive Order. This action is not 

subject to Executive Order 13045 

because it does not establish an 

environmental standard intended to 

mitigate health or safety risks and 

because it implements specific 

standards established by Congress in 

statutes (section 211(o) of the Clean Air 

Act). 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211 because it is not a 

significant regulatory action under 

Executive Order 12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

This rulemaking does not involve 

technical standards. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

This proposed rule is a technical 

correction and does not concern an 

environmental health or safety risk. 

Therefore, Executive Order 12898 does 

not apply. 

VII. Statutory Authority 

Statutory authority for this proposed 

action comes from section 211 of the 

Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7545. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Diesel fuel, Fuel 

additives, Gasoline, Imports, Oil 

imports, Petroleum, Renewable fuel. 

Dated: March 24, 2015. 

Gina McCarthy, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07478 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0467; FRL–9925–57– 

Region 9] 

Designation of Areas for Air Quality 

Planning Purposes; California; San 

Joaquin Valley, South Coast Air Basin, 

Coachella Valley, and Sacramento 

Metro Ozone Nonattainment Areas; 

Reclassification 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is withdrawing a 

proposed action to reclassify the Indian 

country pertaining to the Pechanga 

Band of Luisen ̃o Mission Indians 

(Pechanga Reservation) from ‘‘Severe17’’ to ‘‘Extreme’’ for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone national ambient air quality 

standard. 

DATES: The proposed rule published on 

August 27, 2009 (74 FR 43654) is 

withdrawn with respect to the Pechanga 

Reservation on April 3, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken 

Israels, Grants and Program Integration 

Office (AIR–8), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 

947–4102, israels.ken@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 

27, 2009 (74 FR 43654), the EPA 

published a proposed rule to grant 

requests by the State of California to 

reclassify four nonattainment areas for 

the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient 

air quality standard (‘‘standard’’) and to 

reclassify Indian country in keeping 

with the classifications of 

nonattainment areas within which they 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules 18185 

are located. On May 5, 2010 (75 FR 

24409), the EPA finalized the action as 

proposed except that EPA deferred 

reclassification of Indian country 

pertaining to the Morongo Band of 

Mission Indians (Morongo Reservation) 

and the Pechanga Band of Luisen ̃ o 

Mission Indians (Pechanga Reservation) 

in keeping with the state’s request for 

the South Coast Air Basin. On January 

6, 2015 (80 FR 436), the EPA proposed 

to revise the boundaries of South Coast 

and San Diego ozone planning areas to 

designate the Pechanga Reservation as a 

separate air quality planning area for the 

1997 8-hour ozone standard. In the 

January 6, 2015 proposed rule, the EPA 

indicated that, if the Agency finalizes 

the January 6, 2015 proposed rule, as 

proposed, the EPA would withdraw the 

August 27, 2009 proposed rule to the 

extent that the 2009 proposed rule 

relates to the Pechanga Reservation. See 

80 FR 436, at 438 (January 6, 2015). In 

the Rules and Regulations section of this 

Federal Register, the EPA is finalizing 

its January 6, 2015 proposed rule, as 

proposed. In light of final Agency action 

on the January 6, 2015 proposal, the 

EPA is withdrawing the August 27, 2009 

proposed reclassification of the 

Pechanga Reservation for the 1997 8- 

hour ozone standard. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, National parks, Ozone, 

Wilderness areas. 

Dated: March 20, 2015. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07535 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Chapter I 

[GN Docket No. 12–268; FCC 15–38] 

Comment Sought on Defining 

Commencement of Operations in the 

600 MHz Band 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission) seeks comment on 

defining the term ‘‘commence 

operations’’ for 600 MHz Band wireless 

licensees in the context of the transition 

rules adopted in the Incentive Auction 

Report and Order. 

DATES: Comments are due on or before 

May 1, 2015; reply comments are due on 

or before May 18, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by the docket number in this 

proceeding, GN Docket No. 12–268, by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Federal Communications 

Commission’s Electronic Comment 

Filing System (ECFS): http://fcc.gov/

ecfs/. Follow the instructions for 

submitting comments. 

• Commercial overnight mail (other 

than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail 

and Priority Mail): Federal 

Communications Commission, 9300 

East Hampton Dr., Capitol Heights, MD 

20743. 

• U.S. Postal Service (First-class, 

Express, and Priority): Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

St. SW., Washington, DC 20554. 

• Hand-delivered/Courier: Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

St. SW., Room TW–A325, Washington, 

DC 20554. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. 

to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be 

held together with rubber bands or 

fasteners. Any envelopes and boxes 

must be disposed of before entering the 

building. 

• Instructions: All submissions 

received must include the agency name 

and docket number or Regulatory 

Information Number (RIN) for this 

document. All comments received will 

be posted without change to ECFS at 

http://fcc.gov/ecfs/, including any 

personal information provided. 

• Docket: This document is in GN 

Docket No. 12–268. For access to the 

docket to read background documents 

or comments received, go to ECFS at 

http://fcc.gov/ecfs/. 

For detailed instructions on submitting 

comments and additional information 

on the rulemaking process, see the 

‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Simon Banyai of the Wireless 

Telecommunications Bureau, 

Broadband Division, at (202) 418–1443 

or email to simon.banyai@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document was adopted on March 26, 

2015 and released on March 26, 2015, 

and is available electronically at 

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/

attachmatch/FCC-15-38A1.pdf. The 

complete text of this document as well 

as any comments, reply comments, and 

ex parte submissions will also be 

available for public inspection during 

regular business hours in the FCC 

Reference Center (CY–A257) at the 

Federal Communications Commission, 

445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC, 

20554. These documents will be 

available electronically in ASCII, 

Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat. 

Public Participation 

Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the 

Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 

1.419, interested parties may file 

comments and reply comments on or 

before the dates indicated on the first 

page of this document. Comments may 

be filed using the Commission’s ECFS. 

See Electronic Filing of Documents in 

Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 

(1998). 

• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to 

file by paper must file an original and 

one copy of each filing. If more than one 

active docket or rulemaking number 

appears in the caption of this 

proceeding, filers must submit two 

additional copies for each additional 

docket or rulemaking number. Filings 

can be sent by commercial overnight 

courier, or by first-class or overnight 

U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings 

must be addressed to the Commission’s 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary, 

Federal Communications Commission. 

• People with Disabilities: To request 

materials in accessible formats for 

people with disabilities (braille, large 

print, electronic files, audio format), 

send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call 

the Consumer & Governmental Affairs 

Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), or 

202–418–0432 (tty). 

I. Summary 

1. In the Incentive Auction Report and 

Order, the Commission adopted rules to 

implement the incentive auction 

through which certain broadcast 

television spectrum will be repurposed 

for wireless flexible use to create the 

600 MHz Band (See Expanding the 

Economic and Innovation Opportunities 

of Spectrum Through Incentive 

Auctions, GN Docket No. 12–268, 

Report and Order, published at 79 FR 

48442 (2014) (Incentive Auction Report 

and Order)). These rules include 

procedures governing the transition of 

broadcast television services and other 

operations out of the 600 MHz Band. As 

described below, the procedures the 

Commission adopted permit certain 

operations to continue in the 600 MHz 

spectrum until a 600 MHz Band 

wireless licensee ‘‘commences 

operations’’ in its licensed spectrum. 

The Commission did not define the term 

‘‘commence operations,’’ but indicated 

that it would do so in the pre-auction 

process. By this document, the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS