alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis: Notice of 
Charter Renewal.

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Council for the 
Elimination of Tuberculosis, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed 
for a 2-year period through March 15, 2009.
    For information, contact Kenneth Castro, M.D., Executive Secretary, 
Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human 
Services, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E10, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, 
telephone 404/639-8000 or fax 404/639-8604.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 26, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-6016 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# C_2007155EN.01002102.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 May 2007 — La Perla v OHIM — Worldgem Brands (NIMEI LA PERLA MODERN CLASSIC)

(Case T-137/05) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Community word mark NIMEI LA PERLA MODERN CLASSIC - Earlier national figurative and word marks la PERLA and LA PERLA PARFUMS - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94)

(2007/C 155/41)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Gruppo La Perla SpA (Bologna, Italy) (represented by: R. Morresi and A. Dal Ferro, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially M. Capostagno, and subsequently O. Montalto, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal, intervener before the Court of First Instance: Worldgem Brands — Gestão e Investimentos Lda, formerly Cielo Brands — Gestão e Investimentos Lda, (Madeira, Portugal) (represented by: G. Bozzola et C. Bellomunno, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal, intervener before the Court of First Instance:

da

da

Re:

Appeal lodged against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 January 2005 (Case R 537/2004-1) relating to cancellation proceedings between Gruppo La Perla SpA and Worldgem Brands — Gestão e Investimentos Lda.

da

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 January 2005 (Case R537/2004-1) is annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 January 2005 (Case R537/2004-1) is annulled.

| 2. | The intervener is ordered to bear its own costs and to bear one third of the applicant's costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The intervener is ordered to bear its own costs and to bear one third of the applicant's costs.

| 3. | The applicant is ordered to bear two thirds of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The applicant is ordered to bear two thirds of its own costs.

| 4. | OHIM is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

OHIM is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 132 of 28.5.2005.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NeuStar, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 August 11, 2006
    
    /s/ Jeffrey E. Ganek

Jeffrey E. Ganek
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**





I,
      Neil
      Smit, the President and Chief Executive Officer of CCH II, LLC and CCH II
      Capital Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
      certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission:




·
            fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934; and




·
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









/s/
      Neil
      Smit


Neil
      Smit


President
      and Chief
      Executive Officer


August
      13,
      2007
***FLINT
        RIVER BANCSHARES, INC.***
 ***Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350***
 **Exhibit
        32.1**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Flint River Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald
      E. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.











August
      15, 2005





/s/
      Gerald E. Lewis


Gerald
      E.
      Lewis


Chief
      Executive Officer




-13-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of intent; withdrawal. 

# SUMMARY:

The permit applicant, TransAlta Centralia Mining LLC (TCM) has greatly reduced the scope of its proposed coal mining project at Centralia, Washington. Therefore, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is withdrawing its Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS). 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Jonathan Smith at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle Regulatory Branch, 4735 E. Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington 98134, (206) 764-6910, or e-mail                         *Jonathan.Smith@nws02.usace.army.mil.*                         Mr. Mark Cline, at the Washington Department of Ecology, 300 Desmond Drive, SE., Lacey, Washington 98503, or e-mail                         *mcli461@ecy.wa.gov*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Corps and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) published a notice of intent in the April 7, 2006, issue of the                     **Federal Register**                     (71 FR 17840) to prepare an EIS on TCM's proposed Pit 7 Mining Project. Since that time, TCM's proposed project has evolved from a coal mining project, affecting over 100 acres of wetlands and streams, to a railroad upgrade project for importing coal from existing, already permitted mines in Montana and Wyoming. This modified proposal appears likely to affect less than three acres of wetlands. Therefore, the Corps and Ecology plan to conduct an environmental assessment of the proposed rail upgrade project during the first half of year 2007. An EIS would be prepared only if results of the environmental assessment indicate potentially significant, adverse environmental impacts.                 

      ( print page 2267)    
Dated: January 5, 2007. 

Michelle Walker, 

Chief, Regulatory Branch, Seattle District.

 [FR Doc. E7-632 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710-ER-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      I, Peyton R. Patterson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer hereby certify that NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.

|   | /s/ Peyton R. Patterson              |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Peyton R. Patterson                  |
|   | Chairman of the Board, President and |
|   | Chief Executive Officer              |

Date:   August 4, 2010

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ZucKERT ScouTT 

RASENBERGER 

VIA REGULATIONS.GOV 

Brett Kruger 

September 2, 2014 

Acting Division Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

888 Seventeenth Street, Nw, Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20006-3309 

Phone 202.298.8660 

Fax 202.342.0683 

www.zsrlaw.com 

Re: Application of Virgin America Inc. for a Blanket Statement of 

Authorization (Code-sharing U.S.-Taiwan); 

Docket DOT -OST -2014-0148 

Dear Mr. Kruger: 

We have polled the air carrier representatives on the attached service list regarding the 

above-captioned Application and received no objections. Accordingly, we respectfully request 

expedited consideration of this Application. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Jonathon 

~~en~1- H. Foglia 

Counsel to Virgin America Inc. 

cc: Attached service list 

Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, L.L.P. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I caused a copy of the foregoing letter to be served, this 2nd day of 

September, 2014, via email transmission, on the following persons: 

george.cameal@hoganlovells.con1 

~ . h 'lr.;:-, .trancis .. e1 ,qi,aa.com 

howard.kass@aa.com 

robert. wirick@aa. com 

sascha. vanderbellen(q)delta.com 

san1etta.c. ban1ett@),delta.com 

sllunsford(~fedex.conl 

sharon. pasley@fedex.com 

gbleopard@..fedex.com 

perkmann(~cooley.com (Counsel for Hawaiian Airlines) 

jhill@cooley.com_ (Counsel for Hawaiian Airlines) 

kevin.montgomerv(iiJ.polaraircargo.cotn 

peter. beckett(a).polaraircargo. co1n 

dan. weiss«_i),united.conl 

gn1urphv({L1crowell.com (Counsel for United Airlines) 

anita.mosner(i4hklaw.cotn (Counsel for United Parcel Service) 

jetmifer.no-vvak@hklaw.conl (Counsel for United Parcel Service) 

david.christofano(q)dot. gov 

robert.finamore@dot.gov 

brett.kruger(d{dot.gov 

• hn d C,'.(:". T 10 .s. tmcatlt~l{.taa.gov 

info~V,airlineinfo.com 

!fkt)2; ') 

Bryant Templeton
(Reap. Dec. 9205)

#### Patrick & Graves *v.*United States

Entry No. 2665 H.

(Decided August 13, 1958)

*Stein & Shostak*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to three used automobiles exported from West Germany and entered at the port of Houston, Tex.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case is before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of these articles is export value, as defined in section 402 (d), of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for the merchandise is $1,000 per car, f. o. b. Hamburg, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The Marine Mammal ProtectionAct of 1972 annual report [electronic resource].**
 
1972-73 | 1975-76 | 1976-77 | 1977-78 | 1979-80
1980-81 | 1981-82 | 1982-83 | 1983-84 | 1984-85 | 1986-87 | 1987-88 | 1988-89
1990-91 | 1992-93 | 1994| 1995 | 1996| 1997| 1998| 1999-00
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.327:
Item Number:0616-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:000963716
 
July 22, 2019
Exhibit 8.1

Significant Subsidiaries(1)



|                                      |  |                       |  |                   |     |  
|------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------- | --- | -
|Name of entity                        |  | Place ofincorporation |  | Ownershipinterest |    
|1. MakeMyTrip Inc.                    |  | Delaware,USA          |  |                   | 100 | %
|2. MakeMyTrip (India) Private Limited |  | India                 |  |                   | 100 | %
|3. Luxury Tours & Travel Pte Ltd      |  | Singapore             |  |                   | 100 | %
|4. MakeMyTrip FZ-LLC                  |  | UnitedArabEmirates    |  |                   | 100 | %
|5. Luxury Tours (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.  |  | Malaysia              |  |                   | 100 | %
|6. Techblend Inc.                     |  | BritishVirginIslands  |  |                   | 100 | %
|7. Hotel Travel Limited               |  | Malaysia              |  |                   | 100 | %
|8. HTN Co., Ltd.                      |  | Thailand              |  |                   | 100 | %
|9. ITC Bangkok Co., Ltd.              |  | Thailand              |  |                   | 100 | %
|10. Easy to Book Holding B.V.         |  | Netherlands           |  |                   | 100 | %
|11. Easy to Book Service B.V.         |  | Netherlands           |  |                   | 100 | %



Note:

|(1) | As of March 31, 2016.
|--- | ---------------------
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-20432

Summary Calendar

JAMES T. LEGGETT,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BRENT NEWTON; SETH SILVERMAN,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CV-341

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James T. Leggett appeals the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure Rule 60(b) motion, which challenged the dismissal, as frivolous,

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The district court noted that

Leggett’s motion did not state any grounds that would entitle him to relief under

Rule 60(b).

We do not have jurisdiction to review the correctness of the district court’s

dismissal of the underlying § 1983 civil rights complaint, and Leggett is limited

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 7, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 09-20432 Document: 00511104016 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2010
No. 09-20432

2

on appeal to a challenge of the district court’s decision to deny his Rule 60(b)

motion. See Barrs v. Sullivan, 906 F.2d 120, 121 (5th Cir. 1990). Leggett,

however, does not address the district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion and

only presents arguments in support of his underlying §1983 civil rights

complaint. Thus, Leggett has abandoned his only cognizable claim on appeal.

See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th

Cir. 1987) (holding that an appellant’s failure to identify any error in the district

court’s analysis is the same as if he had not appealed the judgment). To the

extent that Leggett raises new claims, we need not address those because this

court does not generally consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal.

See Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S. Auto Glass Disc. Ctrs., Inc., 200 F.3d

307, 316-17 (5th Cir. 2000).

Leggett is cautioned that the district court’s dismissal of his complaint as

frivolous and our dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each count as a strike for

purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387

(5th Cir. 1996). Leggett is further cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes

pursuant to § 1915(g), he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed

while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent

danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

Case: 09-20432 Document: 00511104016 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2010
Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 30 Filed: 04/03/12 Page: 1 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 30 Filed: 04/03/12 Page: 2 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 30 Filed: 04/03/12 Page: 3 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 30 Filed: 04/03/12 Page: 4 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00004-EAS-EPD Doc #: 30 Filed: 04/03/12 Page: 5 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T12:19:31-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Case: 2:10-cv-00126-ALM-TPK Doc #: 17 Filed: 06/22/10 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00126-ALM-TPK Doc #: 17 Filed: 06/22/10 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:10-cv-00126-ALM-TPK Doc #: 17 Filed: 06/22/10 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T16:23:42-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
  1.
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NeuStar, Inc. for the quarter ended June
30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    Information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NeuStar,
Inc.
 August 11, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey E. GanekJeffrey E. GanekChief Executive OfficerAugust 11, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey A. BabkaJeffrey A. BabkaChief Financial Officer