alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
  1.
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NeuStar, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    Information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NeuStar,
Inc.
 November 5, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey E. GanekJeffrey E. GanekChief Executive Officer November 5, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey A. BabkaJeffrey A. BabkaChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Peyton R. Patterson,Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer hereby certify that NewAlliance Bancshares,Inc.’s report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NewAllianceBancshares, Inc.

|   | /s/ Peyton R. Patterson                                     |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Peyton R. Patterson                                         |
|   | Chairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer |

Date:       November 8, 2005

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

Note:  A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and will beretained by NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### U.S. Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - (Docket 8-2007)

                    The                     **Federal Register**                     notice published on March 20, 2007 (72 FR 13081-) describing the application by the Foreign-Trade Zone of Central Texas, Inc., grantee of FTZ 183, requesting an expansion of the scope of manufacturing authority conducted under zone procedures within Subzone 183B at the Samsung Austin Semiconductor L.L.C. facility in Austin, Texas, is corrected as follows:                

In paragraph 2, beginning on the 13th line, the text that reads ``Site 3--Three Way Inc. facilities (1.9 acres; 50,000 sq. ft.)--located at 4009 Commercial Center Drive in Austin'' should be corrected to read ``Site 3--Three Way Logistics facilities (1.9 acres; 50,000 sq. ft.) - located at 8410 Tuscany Way in Austin''.

Dated: March 26, 2007.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-5926 Filed 3-30-02; 8:45 am]

Billing Code: 3510-DS-S
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           Milk - Final Estimates            NASS

----

Frequency of Release:Other

----

Category:Agriculture Economics and Management:Retail and Market PricesAnimals and Animal Products:Dairy

Keywords:dairy cowsdairy farmingmilkmilking rateprices

----

## Releases

Contact office name:National Agricultural Statistics Service

Contact email:nass@nass.usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
  1.
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NeuStar, Inc. for the quarter ended March
31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    Information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NeuStar,
Inc.
 May 10, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey E. GanekJeffrey E. GanekChief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey A. BabkaJeffrey A. BabkaChief Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,                2007,                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                period ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rockelle                Corp. |

| By:    | */s/*  *Gerard                Stephan*Gerard                StephanChief                Executive OfficerChief                Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
In respons e to : Grea t Lake s Airline an

d Silve r Cit y service . Received : No v 5 , 201 0 1:0 l p m ; V PARTMEN T O F XI-101203-00 2 ,„\N3PA. U 

### ^ ^ , « . ..._:OPERATiON S Dea r Senato r Bingaman , •-i; ! pf r'' 2 P U : 3 ^ Than k yo u fo r you r respons e t o Dr . Don Johnso n regardin g hi s concern s about Grea t Lake s Airline s shiftin

g thei r Silve r Cit y destination fromAlbuquerqu e t o Phoenix . Thi s i s ahuge issu e fo

r us . I t mean s cuttin g u s of

f fromAB Q an

d Sant aF e i n term s o f acces s t o resources , training , healt h professiona

l trainin g an

d recruitmen

t an d publi c processes . I t

mean s tha t w e will no longe

r b e abl e t o fl y provider s t o wor

k her e o n alocu mtenen s o

r regularl y schedule d sub-specialt

y car e basis , whic

h i s par t o f ou r pla n t o expan d famil y physicia n an d dentis t trainin g i n Silve r City . Earlie

r thi s wee k I fle w dow n fro mAB Q wit

h Dr . Dou g Dy e wh o flies dow

n twic e amont

h fo r 3 day s eac

h t o cove r Ft . Bayar d in-patients . S o i t

i s als o amedica

l acces s an d coverag e issue . Also , 5 of

6 peopl e o

n th e plan e tha

t da y ha d busines s reason s fo

r trave l t o an d fromABQ . I thin k i f Grea t Lake s want s t

o serv e th e Phoenix area , fine. However , I als o thin k th e purpos e o

f th e publi c subsid

y the y receiv e i s fo

r necessar y connection s of

peopl e t o resource s an

d tha t th e Albuquerqu e ? Silve

r Cit y rout e i s th e o n t y rout e tha t ca n make s th e publi c subsid

y argument . I f

Grea t Lake s serve s Phoeni x fo

r thei r financial well-being , the y should los e thei

r publi c subsidy . I don?t thin k guaranteeing Grea

t Lake s abotto mline wa

s th e reaso n tha

t publi c fundin

g guaranteeing rura

l airwa y acces s wa s created . I a mals o personall

y affecte d b y thi s a s m y daughte r travel s t o an

d fromAB Q t o visi t

he r mother , I trave

l t o AB Q o r Sant aF e no les s tha

n twic e amonth . I ofte

n driv e becaus e of

th e unreliabl e natur

e of Grea t Lakes , howeve

r removin g the option wil

l reduc e ou

r connection s wit

h the res t of state . HMS staf

f member s us e the AB Q rout e constantly . I

n th e futur e w e wil l all hav e t o driv e 4 t

o 5 hour s on

e wa y ever y singl e time . I know yo

u understan

d the dilemma . You r attention t o thi s issu e i s greatly appreciated . Charli e Alfer

o
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to request approval on a new and/or currently approved information collection. 

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before June 4, 2007. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send all comments regarding whether this information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, whether the burden estimates are accurate, and if there are ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the collection, to Janet Tasker, Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Capital Access, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Janet Tasker, Tasker, Office of Capitol Access, 202-205-6657,                         *janet.tasker@sba.gov.*                         Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 202-205-7030,                         *curtis.rich@sba.gov*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                     “Office of Capital Access Online Survey.”                 

*Description of Respondents:*                     Finance Lenders, International Finance Lenders, 7(a) Lenders and CDC's in the 504 program, Small Business Investment Companies, Surety Bond Guarantee Companies.                 

*Form No:*                     N/A.                 

*Annual Responses:*                     23,396.                 

*Annual Burden:*                     1,204.                 

Jacqueline White, 

Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

[FR Doc. E7-6247 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 99.4





CERTIFICATION




I, Eric Roth, certify that:




1           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Extorre Gold Mines Limited;




2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:




(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date:   March 28, 2011

By:
/s/ Eric RothEric RothPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00486-CV

MSW CORPUS CHRISTI LANDFILL, LTD.

v.

GULLEY-HURST L.L.C.

On Appeal from the

117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016DCV-6158-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant. Gulley-Hurst L.L.C. is hereby released from the requirements of a 

supersedeas bond and the deposit made with the Nueces County Clerk shall be 

withdrawn. The Nueces County clerk shall issue payment accordingly, instanter.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 21, 2021
EXHIBIT32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Quanta Capital Holdings Ltd. (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the "Report") andpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, John S. Brittain, Jr., Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1.    The report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

2.    The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

Date: November 4, 2004

/s/John S. Brittain, Jr.         John S. Brittain, Jr.(Principal Financial Officer)

1

----
Case No. 5,424a.

#### GILKERSON et al. v. HAMILTON.

[1 Am. Law. Mag. 35.]

Circuit Court, E. D. Arkansas.

1882.

Assigxhext fok Benefit of Cueditous — Badges of Fraud.

[1. Payment by an insolvent of a just debt to his assignee at the time of making the assignment is a quasi bribe and a badge of fraud.]

[2. The omission of schedules and inventory by an insolvent merchant making an assignment is a badge of fraud.]

[3. Delivery of assets to the assignee before he has qualified himself to take possession by filing the inventory and bond is a fraudulent conveyance.]

[4. Concealment of a large sum in cash at the time of making an assignment renders the instrument of assignment fraudulent and void.]

[This was a suit in bankruptcy by Gilker-son and Sloss against P. C. Hamilton.]

T. C. Hamilton, a merchant of Prescott, Arkansas, \becoming insolvent, made a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors to J. H. Arnold, as assignee, the assignment conveying all the assignor's property, real and personal, wherever found. On the day the assignment was executed, or the previous day, Hamilton paid to Arnold a debt he owed him of $2.0110 in cash. A few weeks after the execution of the assignment. Hamilton, becoming very ill, admitted to a friend that lie had money buried in a glass jar under his corn crib in his yard, and directing that it be delivered to his assignee, stating' at the same time that he intended to make this an addition to his assignment. The friend found in the place designated $3.030, in gold, silver and currency, and surrendered the same to the assignee to be administered under the assignment. There were no schedules attached to the assignment, and the as-signee took possession of the assigned assets before filing the inventory or bond with the probate clerk, as required by the statute, before the assignee should be entitled to take *372possession and there was no inventory taken at the time.

Held (CALDWELL, District Judge):

X. The payment by the insolvent assignor to his assignee of a just debt, when made at the time of the assignment is a quasi bribe, and a badge of fraud.

2. The omission of schedules to tho assignment, as well as of an inventory, is a badge of fraud.

3. Tlie delivery of the assets to the assignee before he -had qualified himself to take possession, by filing tho inventory and bond, was a fraudulent conveyance.

4. The concealment of the $3,030 was part and parcel of the same transaction as the assignment, and rendered the instrument of assignment fraudulent and void.
# C_2007155EN.01002203.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/22

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 May 2007 — Mebrom v Commission

(Case T-216/05) (1)

1

(Protection of the ozone layer - Importation of methyl bromide into the European Union - Refusal to allocate an import quota to the applicant for critical use for 2005 - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Implementation of Articles 3, 4, 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty)

(2007/C 155/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mebrom NV (Rieme-Ertvelde, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Wölker and X. Lewis, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of an alleged decision addressed to the applicant relating to the allocation of import quotas for methyl bromide for 2005, contained in the Commission's letter to the applicant of 11 April 2005

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders the applicant to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the applicant to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 23.7.2005.

1

---
(A. R. D. 64)

#### United States *v.*Freedman & Slater, Inc.

Entry Nos. 704314; 704313.

Second Division, Appellate Term

(Order dated November 10, 1955)

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*trial attorney), for the appellant.

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel); *Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel), and *Sharreits, Paley & Carter (Howard C. Carter*of counsel), associate counsel; for the appellee.

Before Lawrence, Rao, and Eord, Judges

ORDER

A motion having been made by Warren E. Burger, Assistant Attorney General, attorney for appellant, to reverse the judgment of the trial court in the above proceeding and to remand the case to the trial court for all purposes, to the granting of which motion counsel for appellee has consented, and it appearing to the court, after due deliberation, that the interests of justice would be best served by remanding this case to the trial court, it is, therefore,

Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed that the said judgment be, and the same is hereby, set aside and vacated, and the case is remanded to the trial court for all purposes.