alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Merrill B. Blanksteen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer hereby certify that NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.

|              |   | / s / Merrill B. Blanksteen               |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|              |   |                                           |
|              |   | Merrill B. Blanksteen                     |
|              |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial |
|              |   | Officer and Treasurer                     |
|              |   |                                      |
| Date: May 5, 2006 |   |                                      |
|              |   |                                      |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 53084.

#### Julien Giguet, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 96747-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441), the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.3


                             CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION
                            NEVADA-LODE MINING CLAIM

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that DESERT PACIFIC EXPLORATION INC.,
Incorporate in Nevada, whose address is 12475 Overbrook Drive, Reno, Nevada
89511, has located and claimed the Hound Dog #2 Lode Mining Claim in the
following quarter sections(s):

NE   1/4,    Section    1     Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB7M
NW   1/4,    Section    1     Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M
SE   1/4,    Section          Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M
SW   1/4,    Section          Township 1N,        Range 32E,       MDB&M

In Mineral County, Nevada, on the 8th day of November, 1996.

SAID CLAIM IS A LODE CLAIM, it being situated in the above mentioned County and
State, and is approximately 1500 feet long and 600 feet wide, such that 1475
feet is claimed in an West direction and 25 feet in a East direction from the
point of discovery (monument of location), at which the Notice of Location was
posted, together with 300 feet on each side of the monument of location and
center line of the Claim. The general course of the lode or vein is from the
West to the East.

THE NUMBER, LOCATION, AND MARKINGS On each monument are as follows:

         Location          Markings                  Description
         --------          --------                  -----------

No. 1 Northeast corner     diagram, metal tag        2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 2 Southeast corner     diagram, metal tag        2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 3 Southwest corner     diagram, metal tag        2"x2"xz4' wooden post
No. 4 Northwest corner     diagram, metal tag        2"x2"xz4' wooden post

A CLAIM MAP as required by NRS 517.040 is included as part of the work of
location.

Dated:  January 11, 1997

              RECEIVED                      DESERT PACIFIC EXPLORATION INC.
        Bur. Of Land Management
         9:00 A.M.  JAN 24 97               BY: /s/ Herb Duerr
         NEVADA STATE OFFICE                    Herb Duerr, President
            RENO, NEVADA
No. 48590.

#### Protests 615465-G, etc., of Roethlisberger & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of Abstract 48269. The protests were therefore sustained.
#### Alfred Gathers v. State.

176 So. 771.

Division A.

Opinion Filed October 28, 1937.

*Knight & Laird,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Tyrus A. Nor-wood,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Buford, J.

The defendant, convicted of manslaughter under indictment charging murder in the first degree, brings *759his case here for review on writ of error. He presents three questions, as follows:

“1. Did the Trial Court err in his charge to' the jury as to the evidence in reference to the actions and statements of the deceased shortly prior to her death which were in the nature of threats of the deceased to kill or injure the plaintiff in error?

“2. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain a verdict of manslaughter ?

“3. Does the record as a whole warrant a conviction of manslaughter ?”

The statement of questions as above quoted in nowise complies with amended Rule 20 and, therefore, we shall not discuss them in detail. See Croft v. State of Fla., 107 Fla. 724, 144 Sou. 663; Callaway v. State, 112 Fla. 599, 152 Sou. 429; Reese, *et al.,*v. Levin, 124 Fla. 96, 168 Sou. 851; St. Andrews Bay Lbr. Co. v. Bernard, 102 Fla. 389, 135 Sou. 831.

That part of the court’s charge complained of was as follows:

“In a case of this kind threats of the deceased person to kill or injure the defendant cannot be used to justify a claim of self-defense unless such threats were told to the defendant before the killing.

“The Court has permitted evidence to go before you as to alleged actions and statements claimed to have been made by the deceased person shortly prior to her death.

“The purpose of such evidence is to throw such light as it may on the probable truth or falsity of other evidence as to the actions of the deceased person at the time of the alleged shooting in order to determine whether or not her actions were such as to justify the defendant in shooting her *760in self-defense under the law of self-defense just given to you.” ■ ■

We hold the charge to be without error. Uncommunicated threats are admissible - only for the purpose indicated in the court’s instruction here complained of. See Garner v. State, 28 Fla. 113, 9 Sou. 835; Wilson v. State, 30 Fla. 234, 11 Sou. 556.

The record discloses' sufficient substantial evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment. In fact, the evidence is amply sufficient to have sustained a verdict and judgment of a higher degree of homicide.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
#### Brian Barr, Respondent, v Country Motor Car Group, Inc., et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[635 NYS2d 546]

—Appeal from order insofar as decision reserved unanimously dismissed and order affirmed with costs. Same Memorandum as in *Barr v Country Motor Car Group*(221 AD2d 1003 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J.—Renewal.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.
----

EXHIBIT 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gryphon GoldCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Anthony D.J. Ker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) 

The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) 

The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Date: November 14, 2007 

|   | By:    | /s/ Anthony D.J.      Ker    |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   | Anthony D. J. Ker            |
|   |   | Chief Executive      Officer |

----
#### Emanuel Durnherr, *Respondent, v.*Gustavus Rau, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Hardin, J.;

SMrrH, P. J., not sitting.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Subcommittee 
Meeting on Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena will hold a 
meeting on April 19-20, 2007, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 
in Room T-2B3.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of portions that may be closed to discuss General Electric 
proprietary information pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4).
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Thursday, April 19, 2007--8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of 
business.
    Friday, April 20, 2007--8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business.
    The Subcommittee will review the staff evaluation of the MELLLA+, 
GE Methods, and GE DSS-CD Topical Reports. The Subcommittee will gather 
information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed 
positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full 
Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Ralph Caruso (Telephone: 301-415-8065) five days prior to the meeting, 
if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic 
recordings will be permitted.
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 
p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact 
the above named individual at least two working days prior to the 
meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: March 27, 2007.
Cayetano Santos,
Acting Branch Chief, ACRS.
[FR Doc. E7-6077 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UCDP FINANCE, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of UCDP Finance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R.
Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 8, 2008



By:

/s/ JOHN R. SPROULSJohn R. Sprouls President (Principal Executive Officer)




30
#### American Express Co., a/c American Fur Export Co. *v.*United States

No. 6661.

Entry No. 747810.

Invoice dated London, England, January 29, 1946.

Certified January 29, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 26, 1946.

(Decided December 20, 1946)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment wall be rendered accordingly.
No. 51089.

#### Protest 121471-K of W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the action of the collector which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.96.3

SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL AGREEMENT(S)  TO EXHIBIT 10.96.2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment Two, dated as of August 17, 2000, by and between Collins Trust II and
Collins Holdings EME, LLC

Amendment Two, dated as of August 17, 2000, by and between Collins Trust III and
Collins Holdings EME, LLC

Amendment Two, dated as of August 17, 2000, by and between Collins Trust IV and
Collins Holdings EME, LLC
#### Harlan H. Sackrider and another, *Respondents, v.*Josiah P. Cooke, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Haight, J.
r DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CLOTHES WASHER STANDARDS WORKSHOP July 22, 1999 U.S. Department ofEnergy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Room SE-089 Pw:pose ofWorkshop: The objective ofthe workshop will be to discuss: 1) the process and analytical tools to be utilized throughout the clothes washer standards rulemakingprocess; and 2) the uncertainties in the Modified Energy Factor (MEF), due to apparent discrepancies in the remaining moisture content (RMC) results. Outcomes ofWorkshop: To provide a more detailed understanding ofthe process and the tools to be used for the clothes washer standards rulemaking and agree to a plan ofactionto investigate the uncertainties in the test procedure.
9:00 - 9:30 

### am 9:30 - 9:45 

### am 9:45 - 10:15 

### am 10:15 - 10:45 am 10:45 - 11 :00 

### am 11:00- 12:15 pm 12:15 - 12:45 pm 12:45 - 1:00 pm PRELIMINARY AGENDA Openingremarks, Introductions, AgendaReview (Dan Reicher & DougBrookman) OverviewofClothes Washer Rulemaking Status (Bryan Berringer) Revisions to Analysis Test Procedure Issue Plan ofAction ConsumerAnalysis Break Shipments Analysis Review ofTools GRIM Spreadsheet Remaining Issues to be Addressed Next steps - Schedule next workshop Closing Remarks - Adjournment (Bryan Berringer) (Dick Topping, ADL) (Steve Grover, Quantum) (Jim McMahon, LBNL) (Mike Rivest, ADL) (Doug Brookman)
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL

OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provide
Commerce, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Strauss, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 17,
2004



/s/ William StraussWilliam Strauss Chief Executive Officer




In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Provide Commerce, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rex E. Bosen, Vice
President, Finance and Accounting and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. That information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 17, 2004



/s/ Rex E. BosenRex E. Bosen Vice President, Finance and Accounting and Principal Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v GEORGE W. DODGE, Sonarman Third Class, U. S. Navy, Appellant

14 USCMA 440, 34 CMR 220

No. 17,374

March 13, 1964

*Lieutenant (jg) Patrick W. Lee,*USNR, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander C. J. Mackres,*USNR, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Found guilty by a special court-martial, convened aboard the U.S.S. HAZELWOOD (DD 531), of the larceny of a radio, the accused stands before us sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for four' months, and reduction. Our examination of the record discloses, among other things, that evidence was received of incriminating statements made by the accused to his ship’s Executive Officer while he was suspected of the offense charged without delivery of the requisite warning under Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 31, 10 USC § 831. Moreover, in rebuttal to evidence of accused’s general reputation for honesty, the trial counsel was permitted to introduce proof of specific acts of misconduct. Receipt of the statements and proof of such acts were prejudicially erroneous. United States v Tharp, 11 USCMA 467, 29 CMR 283; United States v Nicholson, 8 USCMA 499, 25 CMR 3.

The decision of the board of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A rehearing may be ordered.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RICHARD S. MITCHELL, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

17 USCMA 351, 38 CMR 149

No. 20,650

January 12, 1968

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Major David J. Passamaneck,*and *Captain Kenneth J. Stuart*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*352
      *Lieutenant Colonel David Rariek, Major John F. Webb, Jr., Major Edwin P. Wasinger,*and *Ca-ptain Gregory U. Evans*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

FeRGüson, Judge:

Despite the evidence presented in extenuation and mitigation, the law officer’s instructions on the maximum sentence were limited to a statement of the possible penalty and the mechanics of voting. This was error and, under the circumstances, prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused. United States v Wheeler, 17 USCMA 274, 38 CMR 72.

The decision of the board of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. The board may reassess the sentence in light of the error or order a rehearing thereon.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-04T14:14:33Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-04T14:14:34Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-04T14:14:34Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12796">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-04T14:14:33Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION # o-5173 WAS NEVER ISSUED. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
No. 38954.

#### Protest 329432-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that the merchandise consists of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
No. 59093.

protest 246921-K (New York).

#### Popper Morson Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose anything that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Alyson M. Mount, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Storm Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of August 18, 2010 between Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 27, 2015





Entergy Arkansas, Inc., as servicer





By: /s/ Alyson M. Mount


Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY
DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the report of Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tracey L. Stockwell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 13, 2011



By:

/s/ Tracey L. StockwellTracey L. Stockwell Principal Financial Officer