UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-Q



ý

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017Oro

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period
from                to


Commission File Number: 000-06910



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Texas(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

76-6004064(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
919 Congress Avenue
Austin, Texas(Address of principal executive offices)

78701(Zip Code)


(512) 236-6599(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ý    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an
emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer ý (Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o Emerging growth company o


If
an emerging growth company indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial account
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o    No ý

As of May 12, 2017, 4,751,510 Units of Beneficial Interest in TEL Offshore Trust were outstanding.







---





NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this "Form 10-Q") includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts
included in this Form 10-Q, including without limitation, statements under "Trustee's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Item 2 of Part I
and elsewhere herein regarding the financial position, production and reserve growth, and other plans and objectives are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are generally
accompanied by words such as "estimate," "project," "predict," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "could," "may," "should," "intend" or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or
outcomes. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions about future events. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
expectations are disclosed in the risk factors discussed in Item 1A of Part I of the Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the "2016
10-K") and such other factors as may be set forth from time to time in the Trust's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to the Managing General Partner or the Trust or persons acting on behalf of the Managing General Partner or the Trust are expressly qualified in their entirety by such factors. The Trust
assumes no obligation, and disclaims any duty, to update these forward-looking statements. Risk factors that may affect actual results and distributions to unit holders include, without
limitation:



---







PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.    Condensed Financial Statements.

TEL OFFSHORE TRUST  CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS (UNAUDITED)



March 31, 2017

December 31, 2016AssetsCash and cash equivalents

$
184,755

$
CashRestricted


1,097,598


1,451,135Total assets

$
1,282,353

$
1,451,135​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​Liabilities and Trust CorpusDistribution payable to Unit holders

$


$
Cash advances


252,979


68,224Note payable


1,056,885


1,056,885Trust corpus (4,751,510 Units of beneficial interest authorized and outstanding)


(27,511
)

326,026​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​Total liabilities and Trust corpus

$
1,282,353

$
1,451,135​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​


CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME (UNAUDITED)



Three Months Ended
March 31,2017

2016Royalty income

$


$
713Interest income


1,257


59​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​1,257


772Income withheld for future probate distribution





Proceeds from Note and cash advances used for Trust expenses





142,097Proceeds from sale used for Probate expenses


353,537


General and administrative expenses


(354,794
)

(142,869
)​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​Distributable income





​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​Distributable income per Unit (basic and diluted (4,751,510 Units))

$
.000000

$
.000000​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​Distributions per Unit (4,751,510 Units)

$
.000000

$
.000000​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​


CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS (UNAUDITED)



Three Months Ended
March 31,2017

2016Trust corpus, beginning of period

$
326,026

$
(728,729
)Distributable income





Distribution payable to Unit holders





Proceeds from Note and cash advances used for Trust expenses





(142,097
)Proceeds from sale used for Probate expenses


(354,794
)

Interest Income


1,257


Amortization of net overriding royalty interest





(1,028
)​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​Trust corpus, end of period

$
(27,511
)
$
(871,854
)​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

1

---





TEL OFFSHORE TRUST        NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(1) Trust Organization

Tenneco Offshore Company, Inc. ("Tenneco Offshore") created the TEL Offshore Trust ("Trust") effective January 1, 1983, pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution ("Plan")
approved by Tenneco Offshore's stockholders on December 22, 1982. In accordance with the Plan, the TEL Offshore Trust Partnership ("Partnership") was formed in which the Trust owns a 99.99%
interest and Tenneco Oil Company had initially owned a .01% interest. In general, the Plan was effected by transferring an overriding royalty interest equivalent to a 25% net profits interest (the
"Original Royalty") in the oil and gas properties (the "Royalty Properties") of Tenneco Exploration, Ltd. located offshore Louisiana to the Partnership and issuing certificates evidencing units
of beneficial interest in the Trust ("Units") in liquidation and cancellation of Tenneco Offshore's common stock. The term "Original Royalty" shall refer to the initial 25% net profits interest in the
Royalty Properties and the term "Royalty" shall refer to the applicable net profits interest held from time to time by the Partnership following the Royalty Sales (as defined in Note 3 below).

On
January 14, 1983, Tenneco Offshore distributed Units to holders of Tenneco Offshore's common stock on the basis of one Unit for each common share owned on such date.

The
terms of the Trust Agreement, dated January 1, 1983 (as amended, the "Trust Agreement"), provide, among other things, that:



On
October 27, 2011, the Partnership consummated the 2011 Royalty Sale (as defined in Note 3) and sold 20% of the Original Royalty (or 5% of 8/8ths). See Note 3.

On
October 31, 2013, the Partnership consummated the 2013 Royalty Sale (as defined in Note 3) and sold 25% of its remaining interest in the Original Royalty (or 5% of
8/8ths). See Note 3.

2

---



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(1) Trust Organization (Continued)

On
June 24, 2016, the Partnership consummated the 2016 Royalty Sale (as defined in Note 3) and sold all of its remaining interest in the Original Royalty (or 15% of
8/8ths). As a result of consummation of the sale, the Partnership no longer owns any overriding royalty interest in the Royalty Properties. See Note 3.

The
Trust is currently administered by The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (the "Corporate Trustee"), which succeeded JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the corporate trustee,
effective October 2, 2006 pursuant to an agreement under which The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. acquired substantially all of the corporate trust business of JPMorgan Chase
(formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), and Gary C. Evans, Thomas H. Owen, Jr., and Jeffrey S. Swanson (the "Individual Trustees"), as trustees (collectively, the "Trustees"). The Individual
Trustees tendered their resignations on January 17, 2017 and such resignations will become effective, subject to any earlier termination of the Trust, on September 1, 2017.

The
Trustees, including the Corporate Trustee, have no authority over, have not evaluated and make no statement concerning, the internal control over financial reporting of any of the
owner or owners of the Royalty Properties (the "Working Interest Owners").

(2) Basis of Accounting and Going Concern

The accompanying unaudited financial information has been prepared by the Corporate Trustee. The accompanying financial information is prepared on a comprehensive basis of accounting
other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The Trustees believe that the information furnished reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of
the Trustees, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. Such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The financial information should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Overriding Royalty Interest.The Trust uses the modified cash basis of accounting to report Trust receipts from the overriding royalty
and payments
of expenses incurred. Actual cash distributions to the Trust were made based on the terms of the conveyance that created the Trust's overriding royalty interest. Prior to the Royalty Sales (as defined
in Note 3), the overriding royalty interest entitled the Trust to receive revenues (oil, gas and natural gas liquid sales) less expenses (the amount by which all royalties, lease operating
expenses including well workover costs, production and property taxes, post-production costs including plugging and abandonment, and producing overhead of the underlying properties) multiplied by the
Partnership's interest in the Original Royalty. The Original Royalty initially represented a 25% net profits interest but after the Royalty Sales, the Partnership no longer owns any overriding
interest in the Royalty properties.

3

---



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(2) Basis of Accounting and Going Concern (Continued)

Modified Cash Basis of Accounting.The condensed financial statements of the Trust, as prepared on a modified cash basis, reflect the
Trust's assets,
liabilities, Trust corpus, earnings and distributions, as follows:



This
manner of reporting income and expenses is considered to be the most meaningful because the quarterly distributions to Unit holders are based on net cash receipts received from the
Working Interest Owners. The condensed financial statements of the Trust differ from condensed financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, because, under such principles, Royalty income and
Trust general and administrative expenses for a quarter would be recognized on an accrual basis. In addition, amortization of the net overriding royalty interest, calculated on a units-of-production
basis, was charged directly to Trust corpus since such amount did not affect distributable income. This comprehensive basis of accounting other than GAAP corresponds to the accounting permitted for
royalty trusts by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as specified by Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E,Financial Statements of Royalty
Trusts.

Oil and Gas Reserves.The proved oil and gas reserves for the underlying properties were previously estimated by independent petroleum
engineers.
Reserve engineering is a subjective process that is dependent upon the quality of available data and the interpretation thereof. Estimates by different engineers often vary, sometimes significantly.
In addition, physical factors such as the results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of an estimate, as well as economic factors

4

---



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(2) Basis of Accounting and Going Concern (Continued)

such
as changes in product prices and production costs, may justify revision of such estimates. Accordingly, oil and gas quantities ultimately recovered and the timing of production may be
substantially different from estimates.

The
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows was prepared using assumptions made pursuant to FASB and SEC guidelines. Such assumptions include using average fiscal-year
oil and gas prices (calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month reporting period) and year-end costs for estimated future
production expenditures. Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using a 10% discount rate. Changes in any of these assumptions could have a significant impact on the standardized measure. The
standardized measure does not necessarily result in an estimate of the current fair market value of proved reserves.

Amortization of Overriding Royalty Interest.The Trust amortized the investment in overriding royalty interest using the
units-of-production method.
The Trust's rate of recording amortization was dependent upon the estimates of total proved reserves, which incorporated various assumptions and future projections. If the estimates of total proved
reserves declined significantly, the rate at which the Trust recorded amortization expense would have increased, reducing Trust corpus. Such a decline in reserves may result from lower commodity
prices, which may make it uneconomic to produce from higher cost fields. As a result of the 2016 Royalty Sale, the Trust no longer holds any investment in the overriding royalty interest and there
will be no further amortization.

Impairment of Investment in Overriding Royalty Interest.The Trust reviewed overriding royalty interests in oil and gas properties for
possible
impairment whenever events or circumstances indicated the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If there was an indication of impairment, the Trust prepared an estimate of future cash
flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If these cash flows were less than the carrying amount of the asset, an
impairment loss was recognized to write down the asset to its estimated fair value. Preparation of estimated expected future cash flows is inherently subjective and was based on the Corporate
Trustee's best estimate of assumptions concerning expected future conditions. As a result of the 2016 Royalty Sale, the Trust no longer holds any investment in the overriding royalty interest and
there will be no further impairments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents.Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three
months or
less.

Restricted Cash.Restricted cash reported on the Condensed Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Trust Corpus consists of (i)
 proceeds received
by the Trust from the 2016 Royalty Sale and (ii) the distribution received by the Trust as a result of the Cox Oil Sale (as defined below). The proceeds from the 2016 Royalty Sale are required
to be held in a segregated account pending resolution of the Probate Proceeding (as defined in Note 5). The distribution received from Cox Oil, resulting from Chevron's sale of ship shoal
182/183 to Cox Oil effective as of August 1, 2015 (the "Cox Oil Sale"), is also being withheld by the Trust pending resolution of the Probate Proceeding.

5

---





TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(2) Basis of Accounting and Going Concern (Continued)

Proceeds from Sale of Overriding Royalty.The Trust recorded proceeds from the sale of overriding royalty interests when received.

Use of Estimates.The preparation of financial statements requires the Trustees to make use of estimates and assumptions that affect
amounts reported
in the condensed financial statements as well as certain disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.There were no accounting pronouncements issued during the three months ended March 31, 2017,
applicable to
the Trust or its condensed financial statements.

Going Concern.The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Trust will continue as a going
concern. Financial
statements prepared on the going concern basis assume the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. As discussed in Note 5 to the condensed
financial statements of the Trust in this Form 10-Q, certain
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Trust's ability to continue as a going concern. The Trustees' plans concerning this matter are also discussed in Note 5 to the condensed financial
statements of the Trust in this Form 10-Q. The condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

(3) Net Overriding Royalty Interest

The Original Royalty entitled the Trust to its share (99.99%) of 25% of the Net Proceeds attributable to the Royalty Properties. The Conveyance, dated January 1, 1983, provided
that the Working Interest Owners would calculate, for each period of three months commencing the first day of February, May, August and November, an amount equal to 25% of the Net Proceeds from their
oil and gas properties for the period. Generally, "Net Proceeds" means the amount received by the Working Interest Owners from the sale of minerals from the Royalty Properties less operating and
capital costs incurred, management fees and expense reimbursements owing to the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, applicable taxes other than income taxes, and the Special Cost Escrow
account. The Special Cost Escrow account was established for the future costs to be incurred to plug and abandon wells, dismantle and remove platforms, pipelines and other production facilities, and
for the estimated amount of future capital expenditures on the Royalty Properties. Net Proceeds did not include amounts received by the Working Interest Owners as advance gas payments, "take-or-pay"
payments or similar payments unless and until such payments were extinguished or repaid through the future delivery of gas.

On
October 27, 2011, the Trust issued a press release announcing that the Partnership had consummated the sale (the "2011 Royalty Sale") of 20% of the Original Royalty (or 5% of
8/8ths). The 2011 Royalty Sale was made to RNR Production, Land and Cattle Company, Inc. ("RNR Production") on October 27, 2011, though the assignment was effective as of
August 1, 2011.

On
October 31, 2013, the Trust issued a press release announcing that the Partnership had consummated the sale (the "2013 Royalty Sale") of 25% of its remaining interest in the
Original

6

---



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(3) Net Overriding Royalty Interest (Continued)

Royalty
(or 5% of 8/8ths). The 2013 Royalty Sale to RNR Production closed on October 31, 2013, though the assignment was effective as of August 1, 2013.

On
June 27, 2016, the Trust issued a press release announcing that the Partnership had, pursuant to a Final Judgment entered in the Severed Proceeding (as defined in
Note 5), consummated the sale (the "2016 Royalty Sale" and, together with the 2011 Royalty Sale and the 2013 Royalty Sale, the "Royalty Sales") of all of its remaining interest in the Original
Royalty (60% or 15% of 8/8ths). As a result of consummation of the 2016 Royalty Sale, the Partnership no longer owns any Royalty in the Royalty Properties. The 2016 Royalty Sale was made to Arena
Energy, LP and closed on June 24, 2016, but was effective as of February 1, 2016. The 2016 Royalty Sale generated $1,830,000 in gross proceeds and occurred as part of the
previously announced formal auction process for the overriding royalty interest. The Trust received a distribution of approximately $1,756.624, representing 99.99% of the net proceeds from the Royalty
Sale of $1,756,800 in July 2016.

(4) Distributions to Unit Holders

In accordance with the provisions of the Trust Agreement, generally all Net Proceeds received by the Trust, net of Trust general and administrative expenses and any cash reserves
established for the payment of contingent or future obligations of the Trust, were distributed quarterly to the Unit holders. These distributions are referred to as "distributable income." The amounts
distributed, if any, were determined on a quarterly basis and are payable to Unit holders of record as of the last business day of each calendar quarter. Cash distributions, when available, were made
in January, April, July and October and included interest earned from the quarterly record date to the date of distribution.

The
Trust currently holds the remaining net proceeds from the 2016 Royalty Sale and remaining proceeds received as a result of the Cox Oil Sale, a portion of such proceeds having been
used to pay certain expenses of the ad litem in the Probate Proceeding. The Trust will not make any distribution of these funds to Unit holders until it receives a subsequent order from the Court;
provided, if the Court approves the terms of the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement (as defined in Note 5) and enters an order approving the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement, the
remaining funds held in the segregated account will be paid to the QSF (as defined in Note 5) pursuant to the terms of the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement.

(5) Probate Proceeding

As previously disclosed on July 10, 2014, the Trustees filed a Petition for Modification and Termination of the Trust (the "Petition") with the Probate Court of Travis County,
Texas (the "Court"). The Petition requested that the Court modify the Trust Agreement to (1) allow for the termination of the Trust by a court order, and (2) allow the Trustees, as
necessary to fulfill the purposes of the Trust and without Unit holder approval to (a) sell all or any portion of the Trust's interests in the Partnership or any other assets of the Trust,
(b) exercise their rights to dissolve the Partnership, or (c) cause the Partnership to sell the Royalty. The Trust completed the process of serving the Petition on the Trust's

7

---



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(5) Probate Proceeding (Continued)

Unit
holders in connection with such probate proceeding (the "Probate Proceeding"). The Court appointed Glenn M. Karisch, attorney ad litem (the "Ad Litem") to represent any Unit holders that were not
personally served. The Ad Litem filed a Counterclaim against the Trust on November 16, 2015 requesting (1) an order to sell all of the Royalty, and (2) an accounting of the
general and administrative expenses of the Trust from 2008 through the present.

The
Probate Proceeding was set for trial on January 15, 2016. Prior to trial, the Ad Litem filed a Motion to Sever asking the Court to sever all matters related to the requested
modification of the Trust and the sale of Trust assets, into a separate cause to proceed to trial. The Ad Litem also filed a Motion for Continuance requesting that the Court continue the trial of all
remaining matters, including the Ad Litem's request for an accounting and the issues concerning the termination of the Trust, to a later date (the "Remaining Matters"). Prior to calling the case to
trial, the Court granted the Ad Litem's
Motion to Sever and Motion for Continuance, severed the matters related to the modification of the Trust and the sale of Trust assets ("Severed Proceeding"), and continued the Remaining Matters to a
later date. The Severed Proceeding has been assigned Cause No. C 1 PB 16 000096 and is styledIn re: TEL Offshore Trust.

The
Severed Proceeding proceeded to trial before the Court on January 15, 2016. At trial, the Court entered a Final Judgment and Order granting the Trustees' request that the
Trust Agreement be modified to permit the Trustees to direct the Partnership to sell the remaining overriding royalty interest held by the Partnership as soon as reasonably possible and granting the
Ad Litem's request to sell all of the Royalty, notwithstanding any requirements of the Trust Agreement to the contrary. The Partnership completed the sale of the remaining overriding royalty interest
on June 24, 2016.

On
August 17, 2016, the Ad Litem filed a Second Amended Answer and First Amended Counterclaim seeking an accounting and asserting, among other causes of action, breach of
fiduciary duties; negligence; gross negligence; intentional conduct and bad faith; and forfeiture of fees and punitive damages. The Ad Litem has also asserted other allegations against the Trustees.

The
Remaining Matters were originally set for trial on November 7, 2016. The Trustees filed a motion for continuance of the Remaining Matters and a hearing for such continuance
occurred on September 14, 2016. At the hearing, the Court granted the Trustees' motion for continuance of the Remaining Matters and scheduled the trial for June 12, 2017.

On
October 3, 2016, the trial judge realigned the parties, such that the Ad Litem is now the plaintiff and the Trustees are the defendants. The Ad Litem then filed an Original
Petition as Realigned Plaintiff ("Realigned Petition") on October 10, 2016, and a First Amended Petition as Realigned Plaintiff ("Amended Realigned Petition") on October 28, 2016, which
continued to assert claims for breach of fiduciary duties and other claims against the Trustees on behalf of the beneficiaries. RNR Production Land and Cattle ("RNR") also filed its own petition on
October 28, 2016, which asserted similar claims against the Trustees as the Ad Litem had asserted. Two other unitholders, Albert and Joyce Speisman ("Speismans" and, together with the Ad Litem
and RNR, the

8

---



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(5) Probate Proceeding (Continued)

"Plaintiffs")
also filed a counterclaim on November 15, 2016, adopting the claims of the Realigned Petition.

On
December 13, 2016, all parties in the Remaining Matters attended a mediation. As a result of the mediation, the Individuals Trustees, and former individual trustee Daniel O.
Conwill IV (collectively, the "Settling Individual Trustees") agreed to a settlement of the Remaining Matters and a Settlement Agreement (the "Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement") was entered
into effective January 17, 2017, among the Settling Individual Trustees, the Ad Litem, RNR, and the Speismans. The Corporate Trustee was not a party to the Individual Trustees Settlement
Agreement. The Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement requires a payment on behalf of the Settling Individual Trustees of $2 million, which will be funded by an existing director and officer
insurance policy, into a special fund to be administered by a person or entity appointed by the Court as administrator ("Administrator"). The special fund will be used as the Court orders and
approves, including the payment of the Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and expenses, the fees and expenses of the Administrator, and the remainder, if any, distributed to Unit holders and/or former Unit
holders of the Trust according to a procedure as approved by the Court. Subject to the Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement being approved by the Court and the proposed final judgment being
entered, all claims of the Plaintiffs against the Settling Individual Trustees relating in any way to the Trust, and all claims of any type that were brought or could have been brought by any current
or former Unit holders of the Trust against the Settling Individuals Trustees relating in any way to the Trust, will be released and will be dismissed with prejudice. A hearing was set for
January 20, 2017 before the Court to consider all pending motions for Court approval of the Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement, the entry of a proposed final judgment dismissing with
prejudice all claims against the Settling Individual Trustees (the "Individual Trustees Final Judgment"), and other related matters.

At
the January 20, 2017 hearing, the Court approved the Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement. The Court also signed the Individual Trustees Final Judgment, along with an order
severing the Final Judgment as to the Settling Individual Trustees, into a separate cause number. The Court also granted the Ad Litem's Motion to Establish the TEL Offshore Trust Qualified Settlement
Fund (the "QSF") and to Appoint Trustee and Administrator. According to the terms of the Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement, the Settling Individual Trustees (funded by an existing director and
officer insurance policy) paid $2.0 million into the QSF.

On
December 30, 2016, the Court entered an order that the Corporate Trustee had breached its fiduciary duties by paying itself compensation in violation of the Trust Agreement.
The Court further found that the breach was intentional and a clear and serious breach. The Corporate Trustee believes that such ruling is legally improper.

On
April 18, 2017, the Corporate Trustee, the Ad Litem, RNR and the Speismans attended a mediation. As a result of the mediation, the Corporate Trustee has agreed to a settlement
of all claims asserted against the Corporate Trustee pursuant to a Mediation Settlement Agreement (the "Mediation Settlement Agreement") that was signed April 18, 2017 among the Corporate
Trustee, the Ad Litem,

9

---



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(5) Probate Proceeding (Continued)

RNR
and the Speismans. While the Mediation Settlement Agreement is binding, it contemplates that the parties will enter into a formal compromise and settlement agreement reflecting the terms of the
Mediation Settlement Agreement and providing for dismissal with prejudice of the Remaining Matters.

On
May 5, 2017, the Ad Litem filed a Motion for Leave to Amend Petition to file its Third Amended Petition as Realigned Plaintiff, and the Corporate Trustee filed a Motion for
Leave to File Its Amended Counterclaim for Modification and Termination of Trust as to Attorney Ad Litem, RNR, and the Speismans. The petitions request that the Trust Agreement be modified to
(i) allow the Trust to be terminated on a date to be established by the Court, and (ii) establish a Trust termination date, which shall also serve as the record date, at which time the
Trust's transfer agent will close the transfer books of the Trust and thereafter no further transfers or transactions in the Trust's units will be registered or effected. The Ad Litem also filed a
Motion to Approve Allocation Agreement. The Allocation Agreement is an agreement among the Ad Litem, RNR and the Speismans that sets forth terms for the distribution of the QSF and provides that 20%
of the QSF shall be distributed among unit holders as of a date in 2014 to be approved by the Court and the remainder will be distributed among unit holders as of the Trust termination date as
approved by the Court. The Corporate Trustee is not a party to the Allocation Agreement.

On
May 15, 2017, the Corporate Trustee, the Ad Litem, RNR and the Speismans entered into a Settlement Agreement (the "Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement"). The Corporate
Trustee Settlement Agreement requires a payment by the Corporate Trustee of $4 million into the QSF on a date (the "Settlement Payment Date") within five business days after (i) the
approval of the settlement by the Court and the entry of a proposed final judgment (the "Proposed CT Final Judgment") dismissing with prejudice all claims against the Corporate Trustee, as more
particularly described below, and (ii) the expiration of the time for appeal and exhaustion of all appeals. At the hearing held on May 15, 2017, the Court approved the settlement, the
Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and the Proposed CT Final Judgment. The Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement also requires the Corporate Trustee to transfer into the QSF all funds remaining
in the segregated account on the Settlement Payment Date. Once the settlement payment and any remaining funds in the segregated account are paid to the QSF and the Corporate Trustee has performed
certain other obligations under the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement, the Corporate Trustee shall have no further obligations or duties under the Trust Agreement and any Unit holder's sole
rights by virtue of their status as a Unit holder or a former Unit holder shall be their right to receive any distribution from the QSF. The QSF will be used as the Court orders and approves,
including the payment of the Plaintiff's attorneys' fees and expenses, the fees and expenses of the Administrator, and the remainder, if any, distributed to Unit holders according to the Allocation
Agreement entered into among the Plaintiffs allocating the proceeds of the QSF, subject to the approval of the Court.

The
Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement provides that the Plaintiffs and all current and former Unit holders who were served by publication and did not answer or appear in the
Remaining Matters that the Ad Litem was appointed to represent (the "AAL Parties") release all claims against the Corporate Trustee, as well as its agents, representatives, counsel, insurers, heirs,
successors and

10

---



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(5) Probate Proceeding (Continued)

assigns,
except for any claims arising from debts or extensions of credit by and between the Corporate Trustee and the Plaintiffs, their agents, representatives, counsel, insurers, heirs, successors
and assigns or any Unit holders, unrelated to the Trust or the Probate Proceeding. The Court has previously ruled that all damages payable by the Corporate Trustee shall be for the benefit of all Unit
holders not just those who have sued in the Probate Proceeding. The Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement provides that the Corporate Trustee is settling all such claims and all such claims are
released by virtue of the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and the Proposed CT Final Judgment to be entered pursuant thereto. The Corporate Trustee, in return, releases all claims against the Ad
Litem, RNR, the Speismans, their agents, representatives, counsel, insurers, heirs, successors and assigns, and all current and former Unit holders, except for any claims arising from any debts or
extensions of credit by and between the Corporate Trustee and the Plaintiffs, their agents, representatives, counsel, insurers, heirs, successors and assigns or any Unit holders, unrelated to the
Trust or the Probate Proceeding. The Proposed CT Final Judgment dismisses all claims released in the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement. The Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement further provides
that the Corporate Trustee releases any claims for the repayment of loans or other extensions of credit to the Trust by the Corporate Trustee or any affiliate thereof and further provides that the
Corporate Trustee shall withdraw any application or claim for payment of funds out of the QSF or the segregated account maintained by the Trust.

The
Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and the Proposed CT Final Judgment provide for certain modifications to the Trust Agreement, including the termination of the Trust. The
Proposed CT Final Judgment provides that the Trust shall terminate at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time on June 30, 2017 (the "Record Date and Time"); provided such date will be
delayed in the event an appeal is filed and may be delayed upon request of the Ad Litem or the Corporate Trustee if necessary. Upon the Record Date and Time, all rights of Unit holders in and under
the Trust Agreement shall terminate and all Units and any beneficial interests therein shall cease to exist. The Proposed CT Final Judgment provides that as of the Record Date and Time each Unit
holder shall be limited to its rights with respect to the QSF. The Proposed CT Final Judgment further provides that the Trust's transfer books will be closed and that trading of Units shall not be
permitted after the Settlement Payment Date and the Trust's transfer agent will stop processing any Unit transfers as of the Record Date and Time.

The
Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement was conditioned upon Court approval. A hearing was held on May 15, 2017 before the Court to consider all pending motions for approval of
the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement, the Proposed CT Final Judgment, the modification of the Trust Agreement and termination of the Trust, and the Allocation Agreement previously executed by
the Ad Litem, RNR and the Speisman providing for the distribution of the QSF. At the hearing, the Court approved the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement, the Proposed CT Final Judgment, the
modification of the Trust Agreement and the termination of the Trust. The Court did not approve the Allocation Agreement and it will be considered at a subsequent hearing.

11

---



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(6) Federal Income Tax Matters

The IRS has ruled that the Trust is a grantor trust and that the Partnership is a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Thus, the Trust will incur no federal income tax liability
and each Unit holder will be treated as owning an interest in the Partnership.

(7) Related Party Transactions

Each of the Working Interest Owners owned interests, for its own account, in leases that were in the same area as leases in which the Partnership had previously held an interest. Such
relationships may have given rise to potential conflicts of interests in, among other things, the operation of such leases and in the acquisition and operation of any drainage leases acquired by a
Working Interest Owner for its own account. Additionally, the Working Interest Owners and their affiliates were not prohibited from purchasing oil and gas produced from or attributable to any leases
in which the Partnership had an interest.

Crude
oil sales to Chevron Corporation accounted for approximately 100% of crude oil and gas revenues from the Royalty Properties for the three months ended March 31, 2016. As a
result of the 2016 Royalty Sale, there were no crude oil or gas revenues attributable to the Trust in 2017.

The
Trust's share of Royalty income was reduced by approximately $11,644 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 for management fees paid to the Working Interest Owners as
reimbursement for expenses incurred by them on behalf of the Trust. The aggregate amount of management fees paid to the Working Interest Owners was calculated as 3% of the Trust's share of the sum of
revenues, production expenses and capital expenditures attributable to the Royalty Properties in the period.

(8) Note Payable and Cash Advances

On October 1, 2014, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. made an advance to the Trust in the amount of $363,000, and the Corporate Trustee, on behalf of the Trust as
the borrower, executed a Demand Promissory Note (the "2014 Note") relating to the unsecured $363,000 advance, which evidenced an extension of credit for borrowed money authorized under
Section 6.08 of the Trust Agreement. The 2014 Note was mistakenly made payable to The Bank of New York Mellon ("BONYM"). In addition to the advances evidenced by the 2014 Note, The Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. made additional cash advances in the amount of $209,885 to the Trust for the payment of its liabilities and expenses, primarily in connection with the Probate
Proceeding. On September 25, 2015, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. made an additional advance to the Trust in the amount of $484,000 and the Corporate Trustee, on behalf of the
Trust as the borrower, executed a Renewal Demand Promissory Note (the "2015 Note") relating to (i) the unsecured $484,000 advance, (ii) the renewal and extension of the indebtedness
originally evidenced by the 2014 Note in the original principal amount of $363,000, and (iii) previous advances in the amount of $209,885 made by The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
on behalf of the Trust. The 2015 Note provides for interest at the rate of one half percent (0.5%) per annum. The 2015 Note became due and payable on December 31, 2016 and remains outstanding.
The 2015 Note was also

12

---



TEL OFFSHORE TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

(8) Note Payable and Cash Advances (Continued)

mistakenly
made payable to BONYM. The 2015 Note has been assigned to The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., the party that has made the advances to the Trust. In addition to the indebtedness
owing under the 2015 Note, the Trust has received through December 31, 2016 advances from The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. in the amount of $68,224 and on March 31, 2017
the Trust received an additional unsecured advance of $184,751.55 from The Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Company, N.A. During the year ended December 31, 2016, a portion of the proceeds from the 2015 Note, were used to pay Trust expenses. In addition to the 2015 Note, the Corporate
Trustee used the additional advances received in 2016 and 2017 for the payment of its liabilities and expenses, including those incurred in connection with the Probate Proceeding.

Pursuant
to the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement, the Trustee waives any claim for reimbursement or payment on the 2015 Note and the additional advances described above out of any
funds held by the Trust in the segregated account or the QSF. In addition, the Corporate Trustee agrees to withdraw any pending applications or claims for payment of funds out of the segregated
account or the QSF. It is contemplated that The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., will either advance funds to the Trust for the payment of Trust expenses incurred in the ordinary course of
business for which the Trust is contractually obligated to pay or pay such expenses directly.

13

---





Item 2.    Trustee's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

The TEL Offshore Trust, which we refer to herein as the "Trust," was created under the laws of the State of Texas in 1983 and maintains its
offices at the office of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., whom we refer to as the "Corporate Trustee," 919 Congress Avenue, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78701. The telephone number
of the Corporate Trustee is (512) 236-6599. Gary C. Evans, Thomas H. Owen, Jr. and Jeffrey S. Swanson serve as individual trustees of the Trust and are referred to herein as the "Individual
Trustees." The Individual Trustees tendered their resignations on January 17, 2017 and such resignations will become effective, subject to any earlier termination of the Trust, on
September 1, 2017.

The
Individual Trustees and the Corporate Trustee may be referred to hereinafter collectively as the "Trustees."

The
Corporate Trustee does not maintain a website for filings by the Trust with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to herein as the "SEC." Electronic filings by
the Trust with the SEC are available free of charge through the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. The Trust will also provide paper copies of its recent filing free upon request to the Corporate Trustee.

The
principal asset of the Trust consists of a 99.99% interest in the TEL Offshore Trust Partnership, which we refer to herein as the "Partnership." Chevron U.S.A., Inc., or
"Chevron," owns the remaining .01% interest in the Partnership and is the Managing General Partner of the Partnership. Until October 27, 2011, the Partnership owned 100% of an overriding
royalty interest equivalent to a 25% net profits interest (the "Original Royalty"), in certain oil and gas properties, which we refer to herein as the "Royalty Properties," located offshore Louisiana.
The term "Original Royalty" shall refer to the initial 25% net profits interest in the Royalty Properties and the term "Royalty" shall refer to the applicable net profits interest held from time to
time by the Partnership following the Royalty Sales (as defined below).

On
June 27, 2016, the Trust issued a press release announcing that the Partnership had consummated the sale of all of its remaining interest in the Original Royalty (60% or 15% of
8/8ths) (the "2016 Royalty Sale"). The 2016 Royalty Sale closed on June 24, 2016, but was effective as of February 1, 2016. Due to the effective time of the 2016 Royalty Sale, the Trust
no longer had any interest in, or any operating and financial results attributable to, the Royalty or the Royalty Properties as of February 1, 2016. As a result, the Trust has not provided any
additional explanation for the corresponding decreases in revenues and production under "Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016" below.

Liquidity and Capital Resources; Termination of the Trust

Prior to the sale of the remaining Royalty held by the Partnership in June 2016, the Trust's primary source of liquidity and capital had been
the Royalty income received from its share of the Net Proceeds from the Royalty Properties. Generally, "Net Proceeds" means the amounts received by the owner or owners of the Royalty Properties (the
"Working Interest Owners") from the sale of minerals from the Royalty Properties less operating and capital costs incurred, management fees and expense reimbursements owing to the Managing General
Partner of the Partnership, applicable taxes other than income taxes, and the Special Cost Escrow account. The Special Cost Escrow account was established

14

---



for
the future costs to be incurred to plug and abandon wells, dismantle and remove platforms, pipelines and other production facilities, and for the estimated amount of future capital expenditures on
the Royalty Properties. Net Proceeds did not include amounts received by the Working Interest Owners as advance gas payments, "take- or-pay" payments or similar payments unless and until such payments
were extinguished or repaid through the future delivery of gas.

During
the first quarter of 2016, the Trust received Royalty income of $713 attributable to Eugene Island 342 and in the fourth quarter of 2015, the Trust received $1,316 of Royalty
income attributable to Eugene Island 342. The Trust had not received any distributions of Net Proceeds from Chevron, as operator of the Royalty Properties, since December 2008. On April 15,
2016, but effective as of August 1, 2015, Chevron conveyed certain oil and gas properties to Cox Oil Offshore, L.L.C. ("Cox Oil"), including Chevron's interest in Ship Shoal 182/183 that was
subject to the Royalty (the "Cox Oil Sale"). The Net Proceeds from Cox Oil attributable to Ship Shoal 182/183 were not subject to offset by Chevron against the undistributed net loss carry forward
attributable to the Royalty Properties held by Chevron. As a result of the August 1, 2015 effective time and the Ship Shoal 182/183 properties not being subject to the undistributed net loss
carry forward, the Trust received a distribution from Cox Oil of $116,429 in May 2016. The distribution received from Cox Oil has been set aside by the Trust and will be paid into the QSF (as defined
below) upon approval of the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and entry of the Proposed CT Final Judgment (each as defined below).

Because
of the lack of Net Proceeds, the Trust has in the past not had sufficient cash flow to pay expenses on a current basis and as described below, the Trust has been required to
borrow funds and to cause the Partnership to sell part of the Original Royalty in order to pay Trust expenses. Reference is made to Note 3 and Note 8 in the Notes to the condensed
financial statements contained in Part I, Item 1 herein. As of March 31, 2017, including the proceeds from the 2015 Note (as defined in Note 3), the previous cash advances
from The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. ("BONYM") included in the principal amount of the 2015 Note and subsequent cash advances by BONYM, the Trust's unrestricted cash was approximately
$184,755 at March 31, 2017. As of May 15, 2017 the Trust's unrestricted cash has been fully depleted. While it is contemplated that The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. will,
pending the termination of the Trust, either provide funds to the Trust for the payment of its expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business for which the Trust is contractually obligated to
pay or pay such expenses directly, there are no assurances that the Trust will be able to continue to pay its administrative expenses.

As
more fully addressed in Part II, Item 1Legal Proceedings, the Corporate Trustee has entered into a Settlement Agreement (the "Corporate Trustee Settlement
Agreement") with the Ad
Litem, RNR and the Speismans that provides for the settlement of the Remaining Matters in the Probate Proceeding (as such terms are defined in Part II, Item 1Legal
Proceedings). The Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement requires a payment by the Corporate Trustee of $4 million into the QSF (as defined in Part II, Item 1Legal
Proceedings) on a date (the "Settlement Payment Date") within five business days after (i) the approval of the settlement by the Court and the entry of the Proposed CT Final Judgment (as such
terms are defined in Part II, Item 1Legal Proceedings), and (ii) the expiration of the time for appeal and exhaustion of all appeals. At the hearing held on
May 15, 2017, the Court approved the settlement, the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and the Proposed CT Final Judgment (as such terms are defined in Part II,
Item 1Legal Proceedings). The Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and the Proposed CT Final Judgment also require the Corporate Trustee to transfer into the QSF all remaining
funds in the segregated account on the Payment

15

---



Settlement
Date. Following the transfer of the segregated account to QSF, the Trust shall have no further assets and the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and Proposed CT Final Judgment provide
for the termination of the Trust as more fully described in Part II, Item 1Legal Proceedings.

The
accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Trust will continue as a going concern. Financial statements prepared on the going concern basis
assume the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. As discussed in Note 5 to the condensed financial statements of the Trust in this
Form 10-Q, certain conditions raise substantial doubt about the Trust's ability to continue as a going concern. The Trustees' plans concerning this matter are also discussed in Note 5 to
the condensed financial statements of the Trust in this Form 10-Q. The condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. See
Note 2 to the condensed financial statements.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016



Royalty income was $0 and $713 for each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As a result of the Royalty Sale,
there were no gross proceeds for the underlying Royalty Properties attributable to the Trust for the production period of November and December 2016 and January 2017 attributable to the three months
ended March 31, 2017. Gross proceeds for the underlying Royalty Properties exceeded development and production costs by $1,094,037, or $164,105 attributable to the Trust, for the production
period of November and December 2015 and January 2016 attributable to the three months ended March 31, 2016. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Net Proceeds were applied to
reduce the accumulated excess cost carry forward, which represents the amount by which the aggregate development and production costs for the Royalty Properties since November 2008 have exceeded the
related proceeds of the protection. As a result of such application, there was no distributable income for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

General
and administrative expenses for the Trust were $354,794 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to $142,869 for the three months ended March 31, 2016.
The increase is due, in part, to the timing of the recording of expenses and expenses incurred in the Probate Proceeding.

For
the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, the Trust had undistributed net income of $0 and $164,105, respectively, representing the Trust's portion of
the undistributed net income of $0 and $1,094,037 associated with the Royalty Properties for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. The undistributed net income was applied to reduce
the accumulated excess cost carry forward.

Underlying Properties Comparison

The following financial and operational information has been based on information previously provided to the Corporate Trustee by the Managing
General Partner. The Trustees had no control over these operations or internal controls relating to this information. The lack of revenues and production for the first quarter of 2017 are entirely
attributable to the February 1, 2016 effective time for the 2016 Royalty Sale and, as a result, no additional disclosure on the 100% decrease in revenues and production in the first quarter of
2017 compared to the first quarter of 2016 is provided.

16

---





Volumes
and dollar amounts discussed below represent amounts recorded by the Working Interest Owners unless otherwise specified.

Natural Gas and Gas Products

Gas revenues decreased 100% to $0 in the first quarter of 2017 from $81,116 in the first quarter of 2016. Gas volumes decreased 100% to 0 Mcf
during the first quarter of 2017 from 43,878 Mcf in the first quarter of 2016. The average price received for natural gas decreased 100% to $0 per Mcf in the first quarter of 2017 from an average
price of $1.56 per Mcf in the first quarter of 2016, excluding the impact of the adjustments. Gas products revenue decreased 100%, to $0 in the first quarter of 2017 from $23,137 in the first quarter
of 2016. Gas products volumes during the first quarter of 2017 decreased 100% to 0 gallons from 62,956 gallons in the first quarter of 2016.

Crude Oil and Condensate

Crude oil and condensate revenues decreased 100% to $0 in the first quarter of 2017 from $1,777,748 in the first quarter of 2016. Oil volumes
decreased 100% to 0 barrels in the first
quarter of 2017 from 45,320 barrels in the first quarter of 2016. The average price received for crude oil and condensate production decreased 100% to $0 per barrel in the first quarter of 2017 from
$39.14 per barrel in the first quarter of 2016, excluding the impact of the adjustments to Eugene Island 339 and Eugene Island 342.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures were $0 in the first quarter of 2017 and 2016.

Production Expenses

Production expenses decreased by 100%, to $0 in the first quarter of 2017 from $787,964 in the first quarter of 2016.

Summary By Property

Listed below is a summary of operations of the principal Royalty Properties for the first quarter of 2017 as compared to operations for the
first quarter of 2016 based on gross revenues generated during these periods combined. All decreases in revenues and production for the first quarter of 2017 are entirely attributable to the
February 1, 2016 effective time for the 2016 Royalty Sale.

Eugene Island 339

Net crude oil revenues decreased from $662,064 in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 in the first quarter of 2017. The average crude oil price
received decreased from $36.83 per barrel in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 per barrel in the first quarter of 2017. Net crude oil production decreased from 17,976 barrels in the first quarter of
2016 to 0 barrels in the first quarter of 2017. Gas revenues decreased from $58,949 in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 in the first quarter of 2017. Gas production decreased from 27,145 Mcf in the
first quarter of 2016 to 0 Mcf in the first quarter of 2017. Capital expenditures were $0 in the first quarter of 2016 and the first quarter of 2017. Operating expenses decreased from $23,078 in the
first quarter of 2016 to $0 in the first quarter of 2017.

17

---



Ship Shoal 182/183

Net crude oil revenues decreased from $1,090,667 in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 in the first quarter of 2017. The average crude oil price
received decreased from $40.84 per barrel in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 per barrel for the same period in 2017. Net crude oil production decreased from 26,706 barrels in the first quarter of 2016
to 0 barrels in the first quarter of 2017. Gas revenues decreased from $20,547 in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 in the first quarter of 2017. Gas volumes decreased from 15,895 Mcf in the first
quarter of 2016 to 0 Mcf in the first quarter of 2017. There was also a decrease in the average gas revenue price received from $1.29 per Mcf in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 per Mcf for the same
period in 2017. Capital expenditures were $0 in the first quarter of 2016 and 2017. Operating expenses decreased from $676,682 in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 in the first quarter of 2017.

South Timbalier 36/37

Net crude oil revenues decreased from $20,407 in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 for the same period in 2017. Oil production volumes decreased
from 516 barrels in the first quarter of 2016 to 0 barrels in the first quarter of 2017. The average crude oil price received decreased from $39.58 per barrel in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 per
barrel in the first quarter of 2017. Gas revenues decreased from $1,553 in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 in the first quarter of 2017. Gas production decreased from 783 Mcf in the first quarter of
2016 to 0 Mcf in the first quarter of 2017. The average natural gas price received decreased from $1.98 per Mcf in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 per Mcf in the first quarter of 2017. Capital
expenditures were $0 in the first quarter of 2016 and 2017. Operating expenses decreased from $10,577 in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 in the first quarter of 2017.

Eugene Island 342

Net crude oil revenues decreased from $4,610 in the first quarter of 2016 to $0 in the first quarter of 2017. Net crude oil production decreased
from 123 barrels in the first quarter of 2016 to 0 barrels in the first quarter of 2017. Gas revenues were $66 and gas production was 56 Mcf in the first quarter of 2016, compared to gas revenues of
$0 and gas production of 0 Mcf in the first quarter of 2017. As the underlying interest in Eugene Island 342 is an overriding royalty interest, there were no capital or operating expenses recorded in
the first quarter of 2017 and 2016. Royalty income was $0 and $713 for the first quarter of 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Overview of Production, Prices and Royalty Income

The following schedule provides a summary of the volumes and weighted average prices for crude oil and condensate and natural gas recorded by
the Working Interest Owners for the Royalty Properties, as well as the Working Interest Owners' calculations of the Net Proceeds and Royalties paid to the Trust during the periods indicated. The
following information for the three months ended

18

---



March 31,
2016 includes the effect of the audit adjustments of Eugene Island 339 and Eugene Island 342.



Royalty Properties Three
Months
Ended March 31,(1)2017

2016Crude oil and condensate (bbls)





45,320Natural gas and gas products (Mcfe)





43,878Crude oil and condensate average price, per bbl(2)

$


$
39.23Natural gas average price, per Mcf (excluding gas products)(3)

$


$
1.85Crude oil and condensate revenues

$


$
1,777,748Natural gas and gas products revenues





104,253Production expenses





(779,572
)Capital expenditures





InterestUndistributed net income(4)





(1,094,037
)Refund of (provision for) Special Cost Escrow





​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​Net Proceeds





Royalty interest



(5)

x15
%​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​Partnership share





Trust interest


x99.99
%

x99.99
%​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​Trust share of Royalty Income

$


$
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​


(1)Amounts
are based on production for the three-month period ended January 31 of each year, respectively, and include the results of the adjustments for Eugene
Island 339 and Eugene Island 342.(2)Excluding
the adjustments, the average price for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0 and $39.14, respectively, per barrel.(3)Excluding
the adjustments, the average price for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0 and $1.56, respectively, per Mcf.(4)Undistributed
net loss represents the amount of development and production costs associated with the Royalty that exceed the proceeds of production from the Royalty
Properties during the period. An undistributed net loss is carried forward and offset, in future periods, by positive proceeds earned by the related Working Interest Owner(s). Undistributed net income
represents positive Net Proceeds, generated during the respective period, but not distributed by the Working Interest Owners. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Trust had
undistributed net income of $164,105, representing the Trust's portion of the aggregate undistributed net income of $1,094,037 associated with the Royalty Properties for the three months ended
March 31, 2016.(5)As
a result of the 2016 Royalty Sale, the Royalty interest was reduced from 15% to zero.


19

---



Critical Accounting Policies

Disclosure of critical accounting policies and the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Trust's financial
statements are included in Item 7 of the 2016 10-K. There have been no significant changes to the critical accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2017.

New Accounting Pronouncements

There were no accounting pronouncements issued during the three months ended March 31, 2017 applicable to the Trust or its condensed
financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Trust has no off-balance sheet arrangements. The Trust has not guaranteed the debt of any other party, nor does the Trust have any other
arrangements or relationships with other entities that could potentially result in unconsolidated debt, losses or contingent obligations.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

There has been no material changes to our market risk previously disclosed in Part II, Item 7A of the 2016 10-K.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.The Corporate Trustee maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure
that
information required to be disclosed by the Trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and regulations. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the
Trust is accumulated and communicated by Chevron, as the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, and the Working Interest Owners to the Corporate Trustee of the Trust, and its employees who
participate in the preparation of the Trust's periodic reports as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As
of the end of the period covered by this report, the Corporate Trustee carried out an evaluation of the Trust's disclosure controls and procedures. Michael J. Ulrich, as Trust Officer
of the Corporate Trustee, has concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures of the Trust were effective as of March 31, 2017.

Due
to the previous contractual arrangements of (i) the Trust Agreement, (ii) the Partnership Agreement and (iii) the rights of the Partnership under the Conveyance
regarding information furnished by the Working Interest Owners, the Trustees relied on (A) information provided by the Working Interest Owners, including historical operating data, plans for
future operating and capital expenditures, reserve information and information relating to projected production, (B) information from the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, including
information that is collected from the Working Interest Owners, and (C) conclusions and reports regarding reserves by the Trust's independent reserve engineers. See Item 1A. Risk Factors
"The Trustees and the Unit holders had no control over the operation or development of the Royalty Properties and had little influence over

20

---



operation
or development" and "The Trustees rely upon the Working Interest Owners and Managing General Partner for information regarding the Royalty Properties" in the 2016 Form 10-K for a
description of certain risks relating to these arrangements and reliance on and applicable adjustments to operating information when reported by the Working Interest Owners to the Corporate Trustee
and recorded in the Trust's results of operation.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.During the three months ended March 31, 2017, there has been no change in
the Trust's
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust's internal control over financial reporting. The Corporate Trustee notes
for purposes of clarification that it had no authority over, and makes no statement concerning, the internal control over financial reporting of the Working Interest Owners or the Managing General
Partner of the Partnership.

21

---





PART IIOTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings.

As previously disclosed on July 10, 2014, the Trustees filed a Petition for Modification and Termination of the Trust (the "Petition")
with the Probate Court of Travis County, Texas (the "Court"). The Petition requested that the Court modify the Trust Agreement to (1) allow for the termination of the Trust by a court order,
and (2) allow the Trustees, as necessary to fulfill the purposes of the Trust and without Unit holder approval to (a) sell all or any portion of the Trust's interests in the Partnership
or any other assets of the Trust, (b) exercise their rights to dissolve the Partnership, or (c) cause the Partnership to sell the Royalty. The Trust completed the process of serving the
Petition on the Trust's Unit holders in connection with such probate proceeding (the "Probate Proceeding"). The Court appointed Glenn M. Karisch, attorney ad litem (the "Ad Litem") to represent any
Unit holders that were not personally served. The Ad Litem filed a Counterclaim against the Trust on November 16, 2015 requesting (1) an order to sell all of the Royalty, and
(2) an accounting of the general and administrative expenses of the Trust from 2008 through the present.

The
Probate Proceeding was set for trial on January 15, 2016. Prior to trial, the Ad Litem filed a Motion to Sever asking the Court to sever all matters related to the requested
modification of the Trust and the sale of Trust assets, into a separate cause to proceed to trial. The Ad Litem also filed a Motion for Continuance requesting that the Court continue the trial of all
remaining matters, including the Ad Litem's request for an accounting and the issues concerning the termination of the Trust, to a later date (the "Remaining Matters"). Prior to calling the case to
trial, the Court granted the Ad Litem's Motion to Sever and Motion for Continuance, severed the matters related to the modification of the Trust and the sale of Trust assets ("Severed Proceeding"),
and continued the Remaining Matters to a later date. The Severed Proceeding has been assigned Cause No. C 1 PB 16 000096 and is styledIn re: TEL Offshore
Trust.

The
Severed Proceeding proceeded to trial before the Court on January 15, 2016. At trial, the Court entered a Final Judgment and Order granting the Trustees' request that the
Trust Agreement be modified to permit the Trustees to direct the Partnership to sell the remaining overriding royalty interest held by the Partnership as soon as reasonably possible and granting the
Ad Litem's request to sell all of the Royalty, notwithstanding any requirements of the Trust Agreement to the contrary. The Partnership completed the sale of the remaining overriding royalty interest
on June 24, 2016.

On
August 17, 2016, the Ad Litem filed a Second Amended Answer and First Amended Counterclaim seeking an accounting and asserting, among other causes of action, breach of
fiduciary duties; negligence; gross negligence; intentional conduct and bad faith; and forfeiture of fees and punitive damages. The Ad Litem has also asserted other allegations against the Trustees.

The
Remaining Matters were originally set for trial on November 7, 2016. The Trustees filed a motion for continuance of the Remaining Matters and a hearing for such continuance
occurred on September 14, 2016. At the hearing, the Court granted the Trustees' motion for continuance of the Remaining Matters and scheduled the trial for June 12, 2017.

On
October 3, 2016, the trial judge realigned the parties, such that the Ad Litem is now the plaintiff and the Trustees are the defendants. The Ad Litem then filed an Original
Petition as Realigned Plaintiff ("Realigned Petition") on October 10, 2016, and a First Amended Petition as Realigned Plaintiff ("Amended Realigned Petition") on October 28, 2016, which
continued to assert

22

---



claims
for breach of fiduciary duties and other claims against the Trustees on behalf of the beneficiaries. RNR Production Land and Cattle ("RNR") also filed its own petition on October 28,
2016, which asserted similar claims against the Trustees as the Ad Litem had asserted. Two other unitholders, Albert and Joyce Speisman ("Speismans" and, together with the Ad Litem and RNR, the
"Plaintiffs") also filed a counterclaim on November 15, 2016, adopting the claims of the Realigned Petition.

On
December 13, 2016, all parties in the Remaining Matters attended a mediation. As a result of the mediation, the Individuals Trustees, and former individual trustee Daniel O.
Conwill IV (collectively, the "Settling Individual Trustees") agreed to a settlement of the Remaining Matters and a Settlement Agreement (the "Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement") was entered
into effective January 17, 2017, among the Settling Individual Trustees, the Ad Litem, RNR, and the Speismans. The Corporate Trustee was not a party to the Individual Trustees Settlement
Agreement. The Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement requires a payment on behalf of the Settling Individual Trustees of $2 million, which will be funded by an existing director and officer
insurance policy, into a special fund to be administered by a person or entity appointed by the Court as administrator ("Administrator"). The special fund will be used as the Court orders and
approves, including the payment of the Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and expenses, the fees and expenses of the Administrator, and the remainder, if any, distributed to Unit holders and/or former Unit
holders of the Trust according to a procedure as approved by the Court. Subject to the Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement being approved by the Court and the proposed final judgment being
entered, all claims of the Plaintiffs against the Settling Individual Trustees relating in any way to the Trust, and all claims of any type that were brought or could have been brought by any current
or former Unit holders of the Trust against the Settling Individuals Trustees relating in any way to the Trust, will be released and will be dismissed with prejudice. A hearing was set for
January 20, 2017 before the Court to consider all pending motions for Court approval of the Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement, the entry of a proposed final judgment dismissing with
prejudice all claims against the Settling Individual Trustees (the "Individual Trustees Final Judgment"), and other related matters.

At
the January 20, 2017 hearing, the Court approved the Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement. The Court also signed the Individual Trustees Final Judgment, along with an order
severing the Final Judgment as to the Settling Individual Trustees, into a separate cause number. The Court also granted the Ad Litem's Motion to Establish the TEL Offshore Trust Qualified Settlement
Fund (the "QSF") and to Appoint Trustee and Administrator. According to the terms of the Individual Trustees Settlement Agreement, the Settling Individual Trustees (funded by an existing director and
officer insurance policy) paid $2.0 million into the QSF.

On
December 30, 2016, the Court entered an order that the Corporate Trustee had breached its fiduciary duties by paying itself compensation in violation of the Trust Agreement.
The Court further found that the breach was intentional and a clear and serious breach. The Corporate Trustee believes that such ruling is legally improper.

On
April 18, 2017, the Corporate Trustee, the Ad Litem, RNR and the Speismans attended a mediation. As a result of the mediation, the Corporate Trustee has agreed to a settlement
of all claims asserted against the Corporate Trustee pursuant to a Mediation Settlement Agreement (the "Mediation Settlement Agreement") that was signed April 18, 2017 among the Corporate
Trustee, the Ad Litem, RNR and the Speismans. While the Mediation Settlement Agreement is binding, it contemplates that

23

---



the
parties will enter into a formal compromise and settlement agreement reflecting the terms of the Mediation Settlement Agreement and providing for dismissal with prejudice of the Remaining Matters.

On
May 5, 2017, the Ad Litem filed a Motion for Leave to Amend Petition to file its Third Amended Petition as Realigned Plaintiff, and the Corporate Trustee filed a Motion for
Leave to File Its Amended Counterclaim for Modification and Termination of Trust as to Attorney Ad Litem, RNR, and the Speismans. The petitions request that the Trust Agreement be modified to
(i) allow the Trust to be terminated on a date to be established by the Court, and (ii) establish a Trust termination date, which shall also serve as the record date, at which time the
Trust's transfer agent will close the transfer books of the Trust and thereafter no further transfers or transactions in the Trust's units will be registered or effected. The Ad Litem also filed a
Motion to Approve Allocation Agreement. The Allocation Agreement is an agreement among the Ad Litem, RNR and the Speismans that sets forth terms for the distribution of the QSF and provides that 20%
of the QSF shall be distributed among unit holders as of a date in 2014 to be approved by the Court and the remainder will be distributed among unit holders as of the Trust termination date as
approved by the Court. The Corporate Trustee is not a party to the Allocation Agreement.

On
May 15, 2017, the Corporate Trustee, the Ad Litem, RNR and the Speismans entered into a Settlement Agreement (the "Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement"). The Corporate
Trustee Settlement Agreement requires a payment by the Corporate Trustee of $4 million into the QSF on a date (the "Settlement Payment Date") within five business days after (i) the
approval of the settlement by the Court and the entry of a proposed final judgment (the "Proposed CT Final Judgment") dismissing with prejudice all claims against the Corporate Trustee, as more
particularly described below, and (ii) the expiration of the time for appeal and exhaustion of all appeals. At the hearing held on
May 15, 2017, the Court approved the settlement, the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and the Proposed CT Final Judgment. The Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement also requires the
Corporate Trustee to transfer into the QSF all funds remaining in the segregated account on the Settlement Payment Date. Once the settlement payment and any remaining funds in the segregated account
are paid to the QSF and the Corporate Trustee has performed certain other obligations under the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement, the Corporate Trustee shall have no further obligations or
duties under the Trust Agreement and any Unit holder's sole rights by virtue of their status as a Unit holder or a former Unit holder shall be their right to receive any distribution from the QSF. The
QSF will be used as the Court orders and approves, including the payment of the Plaintiff's attorneys' fees and expenses, the fees and expenses of the Administrator, and the remainder, if any,
distributed to Unit holders according to the Allocation Agreement entered into among the Plaintiffs allocating the proceeds of the QSF, subject to the approval of the Court.

The
Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement provides that the Plaintiffs and all current and former Unit holders who were served by publication and did not answer or appear in the
Remaining Matters that the Ad Litem was appointed to represent (the "AAL Parties") release all claims against the Corporate Trustee, as well as its agents, representatives, counsel, insurers, heirs,
successors and assigns, except for any claims arising from debts or extensions of credit by and between the Corporate Trustee and the Plaintiffs, their agents, representatives, counsel, insurers,
heirs, successors and assigns or any Unit holders, unrelated to the Trust or the Probate Proceeding. The Court has previously ruled that all damages payable by the Corporate Trustee shall be for the
benefit of all Unit holders not just those who have sued in the Probate Proceeding. The Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement provides that the Corporate Trustee is settling all such claims and all
such claims are released by virtue of the

24

---



Corporate
Trustee Settlement Agreement and the Proposed CT Final Judgment to be entered pursuant thereto. The Corporate Trustee, in return, releases all claims against the Ad Litem, RNR, the
Speismans, their agents, representatives, counsel, insurers, heirs, successors and assigns, and all current and former Unit holders, except for any claims arising from any debts or extensions of
credit by and between the Corporate Trustee and the Plaintiffs, their agents, representatives, counsel, insurers, heirs, successors and assigns or any Unit holders, unrelated to the Trust or the
Probate Proceeding. The Proposed CT Final Judgment dismisses all claims released in the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement. The Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement further provides that the
Corporate Trustee releases any claims for the repayment of loans or other extensions of credit to the Trust by the Corporate Trustee or any affiliate thereof and further provides that the Corporate
Trustee shall withdraw any application or claim for payment of funds out of the QSF or the segregated account maintained by the Trust.

The
Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and the Proposed CT Final Judgment provide for certain modifications to the Trust Agreement, including the termination of the Trust. The
Proposed CT Final Judgment provides that the Trust shall terminate at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time on June 30, 2017 (the "Record Date and Time"); provided such date will be
delayed in the event an appeal is filed and may be delayed upon request of the Ad Litem or the Corporate Trustee if necessary. Upon the Record Date and Time, all rights of Unit holders in and under
the Trust Agreement shall terminate and all Units and any beneficial interests therein shall cease to exist. The Proposed CT Final Judgment provides that as of the Record Date and Time each Unit
holder shall be limited to its rights with respect to the QSF. The Proposed CT Final Judgment further provides that the Trust's transfer books will be closed and that trading of Units shall not be
permitted after the Settlement Payment Date and the Trust's transfer agent will stop processing any Unit transfers as of the Record Date and Time.

The
Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement was conditioned upon Court approval. A hearing was held on May 15, 2017 before the Court to consider all pending motions for approval of
the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement, the Proposed CT Final Judgment, the modification of the Trust Agreement and termination of the Trust, and the Allocation Agreement previously executed by
the Ad Litem, RNR and the Speisman providing for the distribution of the QSF. At the hearing, the Court approved the Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement, the Proposed CT Final Judgment, the
modification of the Trust Agreement and the termination of the Trust. The Court did not approve the Allocation Agreement and it will be considered at a subsequent hearing.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors.

The terms of the settlement agreement among the Corporate Trustee and the plaintiffs in the Probate Proceeding provide
for the transfer of the Trust's remaining cash to a qualified settlement fund and the subsequent termination of the Trust.

The
Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and the proposed final judgment (the "Proposed CT Final Judgment") provide that the Corporate Trustee will pay the settlement amount and
transfer the remaining funds in the segregated account into the TEL Offshore Qualified Settlement Fund (the "QSF"). The QSF is administered by a third party administrator previously appointed by the
Probate Court of Travis County, Texas (the "Court"). The funds in the QSF will, subject to Court approval, be distributed pursuant to an Allocation Agreement executed among the plaintiffs. The
Allocation Agreement provides that twenty percent (20%) of the funds in the QSF will be distributed, pursuant to

25

---



a
claims process, to unit holders as of a date in 2014 to be approved by the Court and the remainder will be distributed, pursuant to a claims process, among unit holders as of the Trust termination
date as approved by the Court. There are no assurances that the Allocation Agreement will be approved by the Court. While the settlement has been approved by the Court, if the effectiveness of the
settlement is delayed by an appeal, the funds in the segregated account may continue to be reduced if the Court approves the payment of fees and expenses from the segregated account. In addition, the
settlement payments from the Corporate Trustee and from the Individual Trustees are available for the payment of fees and expenses of the plaintiffs, which may reduce the funds available to the unit
holders under the claims procedures established pursuant to the Allocation Agreement.

The
Corporate Trustee Settlement Agreement and the Proposed CT Final Judgment also provide that the Trust shall be terminated as of a date established by the Court. The effective time
for the termination of the Trust will be 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time on June 30, 2017 (the "Record Date and Time") unless there is an appeal or other intervening event. Upon
termination of the Trust, the Trust's transfer books will be closed and no further transfers of units will be permitted. From and after the Record Date and Time, all units shall cease to exist and all
former unit holders shall be limited to their rights relative to the QSF.

26

---



Item 6.    Exhibits.

(Asterisk
indicates exhibit previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference.)



SEC File or
Registration
Number

Exhibit
Number4(a)
*


Trust Agreement dated as of January 1, 1983, among Tenneco Offshore Company, Inc., Texas Commerce Bank National Association, as corporate trustee, and Horace C. Bailey, Joseph C. Broadus and F. Arnold Daum,
as individual trustees (Exhibit 4(a) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992 of TEL Offshore Trust)

0-06910

4(a)4(b)
*


Agreement of General Partnership of TEL Offshore Trust Partnership between Tenneco Oil Company and the TEL Offshore Trust, dated January 1, 1983 (Exhibit 4(b) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31,
1992 of TEL Offshore Trust)

0-06910

4(b)4(c)
*


Conveyance of Overriding Royalty Interests from Exploration I to the Partnership (Exhibit 4(c) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1992 of TEL Offshore Trust)

0-06910

4(c)4(d)
*


Amendments to TEL Offshore Trust Agreement, dated December 7, 1984 (Exhibit 4(d) to Form 10- K for year ended December 31, 1992 of TEL Offshore Trust)

0-06910

4(d)4(e)
*


Amendment to the Agreement of General Partnership of TEL Offshore Trust Partnership, effective as of January 1, 1983 (Exhibit 4(e) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992 of TEL Offshore
Trust)

0-06910

4(e)31



Certification furnished pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232



Certification furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200299.1
*


Order Approving Settlement Agreement dated January 20, 2017 (Exhibit 99.1 to the Trust's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2017)

0-06910

99.199.2
*


Final Judgment as to Individual Trustees dated January 20, 2017 (Exhibit 99.2 to the Trust's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2017)

0-06910

99.299.3
*


Order Severing Final Judgment as to Individual Trustees dated January 20, 2017 (Exhibit 99.3 to the Trust's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2017)

0-06910

99.399.4
*


Mediation Settlement Agreement dated April 18, 2017 (Exhibit 99.1 to the Trust's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2017)

0-06910

99.1


27

---





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



TELOFFSHORE TRUSTBy:

The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, N.A.
Corporate TrusteeBy:

/s/ MICHAEL J. ULRICH Michael J. Ulrich Vice President


Date:
May 15, 2017

The
Registrant, TEL Offshore Trust, has no principal executive officer, principal financial officer, board of directors or persons performing similar functions. Accordingly, no
additional signatures are available and none have been provided.

28

---



QuickLinks