alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DONALD MEADOWS,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:11CR49

Judge Peter C. Economus

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) that the Court ACCEPT Defendant Donald Meadows’ (“Defendant”) plea of guilty 

and enter a finding of guilty against Defendant. (Dkt. # 11.)

On March 7, 2011, the Government filed an Information against Defendant. (Dkt. # 1.) 

On March 28, 2011, Defendant executed a Consent to Proceed with Conditional Guilty Before a 

United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. # 9.) Also on March 28, 2011, a hearing was held in 

which Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the Information, negligently violating 

the conditions of an NPDES permit by failing to dispose of collected slurries in such a manner as 

to prevent entry of those wastes into waters of the state., in violation of 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c)(1). 

The Magistrate Judge received Defendant’s guilty plea and issued an R&R, recommending that 

this Court accept the plea and enter a finding of guilty. (Dkt. # 11.)

Neither party objected to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R in the fourteen (14) days after it 

was issued. On de novo review of the record, the Magistrate Judge’s R&R is adopted. 

Defendant was found to be competent to enter a plea. Defendant understood his constitutional 

rights. He is aware of the consequences of entering a plea. There is an adequate factual basis for 

the plea. The Court finds that the plea was entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. 

Defendant’s plea of guilty is approved.

Case: 2:11-cr-00049-PCE Doc #: 15 Filed: 06/02/11 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2

Therefore, Defendant is adjudged guilty of violating 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c)(1). The 

sentencing hearing will be scheduled by separate notice from the Clerk.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Peter C. Economus - June 2, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:11-cr-00049-PCE Doc #: 15 Filed: 06/02/11 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A176
#### United States *v.*B. Altman & Co.

No. 7494.

Entry No. 758160.

Invoice dated Geneva, Switzerland, May 20, 1945.

Certified May 22, 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May-7, 1946.

(Decided December 30, 1947)

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney‘General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Marlow & Hines (John D. Rode*of counsel) for the defendant.

Lawhence, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement involves the correct dutiable value of certain watch movements and cases imported from Switzerland.

It appears that the merchandise was originally entered on a pro forma invoice which did not separately state what proportion of the total price was attributable to the movements and to the cases and entry was therefore made on an estimated basis of break-down.

Upon the arrival of the consular invoice it was found that different proportions of the total price were attributable to the movements, cases, bases, ornaments, leather cases, and paper-covered cases, and the collector, therefore, filed this appeal for rea,ppraisement.

When the case was called for trial, it was stipulated in open court by counsel for the respective parties that the foreign values of the above-mentioned items are as represented by the figures found on the break-down sheet marked *“A”*which is attached to the consular invoice and that there were no higher export values for the same on the date of exportation thereof. It was also stipulated that the paper-covered cases referred to in said break-down sheet are the usual containers for the items involved, and that to the total for the above items should be added the charge for export case as shown on the consular invoice.

On the agreed facts I find foreign value as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Actof‘1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for determination of value of the merchandise herein, and that such values for the items involved are as shown on schedule A attached to and made a part of this decision, plus packing as shown on the consular invoice.

Judgment will therefore be entered accordingly.

*344SCHEDULE A

*JSard stones*

*Movements Sw. Ft. Gill silver cases Sw. Ft. Bases Sw. Ft. Ornaments Sw. Ft. Leather cases Sw. Ft. Paper-covered cases Sw. Ft. Total Sw. Ft.*

105. 00 155. 00 20. 00 280. 00

105. 00 155. 00 20. 00 280. 00

105. 00 205. 00 20. 00 330. 00

100. 00 20. 00 _ 15. 00 110. 00 _ 245. 00

100. 00 40.00 .. 15.00 110. 00 _ 265. 00

105. 00 275. 00 20. 00 400. 00

130. 00 260. 00 40. 00 _ 20. 00 _ 450. 00

130. 00 230. 00 40. 00 _ 20. 00 _ 420. 00

315. 00 230. 00 55. 00 ..._ 20. 00 _ 620. 00

120. 00 260. 00 360. 00 50. 00 _ 790. 00

120. 00 265. 00 265. 00 50. 00 _ 700. 00

180. 00 100. 00 20. 00 300. 00

235. 00 100. 00 20. 00 355. 00

1, 850. 00 2, 455. 00 195. 00 625. 00 190. 00 120. 00 5, 435. 00
EXHIBIT 23.1

March 29, 2011


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the incorporation and use in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Innovative Product Opportunities Inc. of our audit report,
dated March 24, 2011, relating to the accompanying audited financial
statements (and related statements included there in) as of
December 31, 2010 which appears in the Annual Report.


De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC

/s/ De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC
Henderson, NV
March 29, 2011



<PAGE>
Exhibit 33.1
 Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria
 1.
    
    Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance
with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Reporting Period). The transactions
covered by this report include privately and publicly issued auto loan asset-backed securities
transactions issued since 2006 for which the Asserting Party acted as servicer involving auto
loans (the Platform).
 2.
    
    The Asserting Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB to assess the compliance with the applicable servicing criteria except for the following
criteria which the Asserting Party determined are not applicable to the activities performed
by the Asserting Party with respect to the Platform: 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122
(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), and
1122(d)(4)(xiii).
 3.
    
    The Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable servicing
criteria as of December 31, 2010 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
taken as a whole.
 4.
    
    Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
on the Asserting Partys assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of
December 31, 2010 and for the Reporting Period.
   By:
    
    /s/ Jason Kulas

Name: Jason KulasTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 30, 2011
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kia Jing Tan, the Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, respectively certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and not deemed filed.

 

September 17, 2014

 
| /s/ Kia Jing Tan               |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Kia Jing Tan                   |   |
| Acting Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)  |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Before the First Division,

October 10, 1945

No. 50561.

#### Protests 973632-G, etc., of Charles Schnabel, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the goatskins are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim for free 'entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
SCWC-30698 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I KAREN SUE MILLER, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON fka BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF CWMBS, INC., CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-8, AND MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30698; CIV. NO. 09-1-1604) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., Circuit Judge Chang in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused, and Circuit Judge Ahn, in place of Acoba, J., recused) Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on November 25, 2013, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, January 7, 2014. Gary Victor Dubin, Frederick J. Arensmeyer and Zeina Jafar for petitioner Patricia J. McHenry for respondents /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Gary W.B. Chang /s/ Karen S.S. Ahn Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30698 07-JAN-2014 10:23 AM
Exhibit 32 (a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MSW Energy Holdings LLC, (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, John T. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael J.
Gruppuso, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/John T. Miller                           /s/Michael J. Gruppuso
---------------------------                 ------------------------------------
John T. Miller                                       Michael J. Gruppuso
Chief Executive Officer                     Chief Financial Officer
May 3, 2005                                          May 3, 2005
**Exhibit 15.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

MakeMyTrip Limited: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-168880) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-193943) on Form F-3 of MakeMyTripLimited of our reports dated June 13, 2016, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of MakeMyTrip Limited as of March 31, 2015 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of profit or loss and othercomprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2016, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2016, which reportsappear in the March 31, 2016 annual report on Form 20-F of MakeMyTrip Limited. 

/s/ KPMG 

Gurgaon, India 

June 13, 2016
#### Faris Appeal.

*56Argued May 5, 1969.

Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen,-Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.

*Alexander A. Notopoulos,*with him *Abraham- Col-bus,*and *Goodman, Notopoulos & Silverman,*for appellants.

*Paul 8. Foreman,*with him *Leo C. Mullen,*and *Mullen, Casanave <& Foreman,*for appellee.

June 27, 1969:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The Redevelopment Authority of Altoona condemned appellants’ properties upon which the Authority filed an open-end bond. Appellants filed preliminary objections contending that, since the Authority had no power of taxation and that its financial resources were questionable, the bond filed was of “insufficient security.” The trial judge dismissed the preliminary objections without requiring an answer or holding a hearing. In so doing we feel that the lower court abused its discretion since a question of fact was raised by the preliminary objections as to the sufficiency of the security. In order to make a determination on the merits of that contention, an adequate *57record should have been made. Hence we remand the case for proceedings upon which this determination cari be based.

Appellants’ contentions with respect to notice, negotiations, and statement of “need and purpose” have been examined and found to be without merit, and the determination of the lower court on these issues is affirmed.

Order modified and as modified affirmed; and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000069215-OCT-201208:36 AM
----

EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofGryphon Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period endedDecember 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael K. Longinotti, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Date: July 20, 2007 
 By:   /s/ Michael    K. Longinotti                Michael K. Longinotti              Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Mark A. Redman, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: May 12, 2005/s/ Mark A. Redman   Mark A. Redman   Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer
#### Irving Wright, Resp’t, *v.*Harriet E. Roberts *et al.,*App’lts. Sarah J. Hamill, Resp’t, *v.*Lewis Roberts *et al.,*App’lts.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed February 10, 1890.)*

1. Mechanic's liens—Continuance on lien.

A formal order is not necessary to continue a lien already ripened into a judgment. The filing of a complaint is a sufficient notice of pendency of action for that purpose.

3. Same.

A summary motion to cancel a lien and restrain its enforcement is not authorized under the statute.

Appeal from orders denying motion to vacate mechanic’s liens and enjoin their enforcement

The liens were filed by sub-contractors in September and October, 1885, and judgment was recovered in April, 1886, directing a sale of the property to satisfy the liens. This judgment was affirmed by the general term ana the case is now pending in the court of appeals.

*Gharks H. Phelps,*for app’lts; *J. S. Millard*and *L. T. Yale,*for resp’ts.

Pratt, J.

The lien act of 1885 is, by § 25, declared to be a remedial act, and must be liberally construed to effectuate the object of the act. In this respect it differs from previous acts that courts have considered themselves bound to construe strictly.

It would not be a liberal rule that should require a formal order to continue a hen already ripened into a judgment And the filing of a complaint may well be held to be a notice of the pendency of an action. It is so at common law, and we are not aware that the effect of a common law *lis pendens*has been taken away by statute.

■ The act points out various ways by which a hen may be removed from the record, but the one pursued by the moving party here is not among them.

The *loches*of defendant affords another reason why the motion should be denied

Orders appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concur.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Post-Effective Amendment to the registration statement
on Form N-4 (the "Registration Statement") of our report dated March 30, 2001,
relating to the financial statements of the Prudential Qualified Individual
Variable Contract Account, which appears in such Statement of Additional
Information.

We also consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of the Registration Statement of our report dated March 13,
2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements of The Prudential
Insurance Company of America and its subsidiaries, which appears in such
Statement of Additional Information.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the
Statement of Additional Information.






/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-----------------------------

New York, New York

April 23, 2001




                                        1
EXHIBIT 35.1
 
 SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
 
 I, Steven C. McNeal, Vice President and Treasurer of Entergy Arkansas, LLC (the “Servicer”), certify that:
 
 (a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Storm Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of August 18, 2010 between Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.
 
 (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
 
 Date: March 27, 2020
 Entergy Arkansas, LLC, as servicer
 
 By: /s/ Steven C. McNeal
 Name:  Steven C. McNeal
 Title:  Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of JohnsonDiversey Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                               |  | 
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ Edward F. Lonergan                                        |  | 
|                   |  | Edward F. Lonergan, President and Chief Executive
Officer     |  | 
|                   |  |                                                              
|                   |  | /s/ Joseph F. Smorada                                         |  | 
|                   |  | Joseph F. Smorada, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.