alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16728-16729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6286]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 4

RIN 2900-AM60


Schedule for Rating Disabilities; Appendices A, B, and C; 
Correction

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) published a document 
in the Federal Register of March 20, 2007, revising its Schedule for 
Rating Disabilities, Appendices A, B, and C. The document inadvertently 
contained two typographical errors, and this document corrects those 
errors.

DATES: Effective Date: This correction is effective April 19, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trude Steele, Regulations Staff 
(211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits 
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-7210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The VA published a document in the Federal 
Register on March 20, 2007, (72 FR 12983) revising its Schedule for 
Rating Disabilities, Appendices A, B, and C to include all current 
diagnostic codes. In FR Doc. E7-4914, published on March

[[Page 16729]]

20, 2007, two typographical errors were inadvertently published. This 
document corrects those errors.
    In rule FR Doc. E7-4914 published on March 20, 2007, (72 FR 12983) 
make the following corrections. On page 12984, in the third column, to 
the right of Diagnostic code No. 5264, the date ``September 9, 1795'' 
is corrected to read ``September 9, 1975.'' In addition, on page 12989, 
in the third column, to the right of Diagnostic code No. 9403, remove 
the phrase ``criterion February 3, 1988'' that appears immediately 
following the identical phrase ``criterion February 3, 1988''.

    Approved: March 29, 2007.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Assistant to the Secretary for Regulation Policy and Management.
[FR Doc. E7-6286 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
<PAGE>
                                 Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of BioVeris Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Samuel J. Wohlstadter, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: February 14, 2005
       ------------------------           /s/ Samuel J. Wohlstadter
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Samuel J. Wohlstadter
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer



A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DEMARCUS ANTOINE MILLS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 330

[ April 21, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Dan L. Vaughn

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312007CF001248A

.

Martin L. Roth of Martin L. Roth, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIA M

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, C.J., C IKLIN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City
Development Partners, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Gault, Jr. certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 15, 2005



By:

/s/ ROBERT K. GAULT, JR.Robert K. Gault, Jr. Principal Executive Officer




26
*    *     *    *    *



EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification



The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Glorious Pioneer Investments Ltd..



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Glorious Pioneer Investments Ltd. and will be retained by Glorious Pioneer
Investments Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|March 30, 2012 | /s/ Wei Guo                                                  
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|               | Wei Guo (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of JohnsonDiversey Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                         
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /S/    GREGORY E.
LAWTON                                
|                       |  |  |  | Gregory E. Lawton, President and Chief Executive Officer



| |  |  |  |                                                              
| |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | /S/    JOSEPH F.
SMORADA                                     
| |  |  |  | Joseph F. Smorada, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(b)

                           REPRESENTATION OF COUNSEL

I, Sandra M. DaDalt, in my capacity as counsel to Sun Life of Canada (U.S.)
Variable Account F (the "Account") have reviewed this Post-Effective
Amendment to the Registration Statement of the Account which is being filed
pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485 under the Securities Act of 1933. Based
on my review of this Post-Effective Amendment and such other material
relating to the operations of the Account as I deemed relevant, I hereby
certify as of the date of filing this Post-Effective Amendment, that the
Post-Effective Amendment does not contain disclosure which would render it
ineligible to become effective pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485.

I hereby consent to the filing of this representation as part of this
Post-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement of the Account.

                                              /s/ SANDRA DADALT
                                              --------------------
                                              Sandra DaDalt, Esq.

April 10, 2001
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.5

                    AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ADVANCE PARADIGM, INC.
                AMENDED AND RESTATED INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN

         The Advance Paradigm, Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Stock Option
Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended, effective December 7, 2000, in the
following respects:

         1.    The first sentence of Section 2 of the Plan is hereby amended to
               read as follows:

               Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(g) hereof, options
               may be granted by the Company from time to time to purchase up to
               an aggregate of 9,718,000 shares of the Company's authorized but
               unissued Common Stock; provided, however, that the number of
               shares that may be granted to any employee under the Plan over
               the term of the Plan shall not exceed 9,718,000.

         2.    In all other respects the Plan shall remain unmodified and in
               full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer of the Company has executed
this Amendment to be effective as provided above.


                                  AdvancePCS


                                  By: /s/ DAVID D. HALBERT
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      David D. Halbert
                                      Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
                                      Officer
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7482

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CURTIS RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Dale Richardson , Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 4:15

- c r - 00492

- RBH

- 1; 4:16

- cv - 02981

- RBH )

Submitted : April 24, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Curtis Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Dolan Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee

. Unp ublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: Curtis Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issu es a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies rel ief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v . Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion
states a debatable claim of the denial of a c onstitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Richardson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Richardson’s motion for bail or release pending appeal , deny a certificate o f appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

TONI MASCIARELLI, 

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. C2-10-1036

TOTE, INC., et al., JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE NORAH MCCANN KING

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or

trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed August 2, 2011, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered TRANSFERRING this case to the United States District Court for the Western

District of Pennsylvania.

Date: August 2, 2011 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:10-cv-01036-EAS-NMK Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/02/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### United States *v.*Malgor & Cía. S. en C.

No. 7507.

Entry No. 1328.

Invoice dated Llubi, Spain, October 22, 1946.

Certified October 24, 1946.

Entered at San Juan, P. R., November 26, 1946.

(Decided January 14, 1948)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

*354LawreNCe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement was submitted on tbe following stipulation:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that •the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, — is as follows:

> United States Dollars 29.30 per 100 kilograms net, packed.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> sis * # * H? * *

Upon tbe agreed facts, I find tbe export value of tbe involved merchandise to which this appeal relates, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 to be the proper basis for determining the value of said merchandise, and that such value is United States Dollars 29.30 per 100 kilograms net, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

DIANNA L. ARMS,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. C2-10-977

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

SECURITY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE NORAH MCCANN KING

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or

trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed March 28, 2012, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered REMANDING this case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further

action. This case is DISMISSED.

Date: March 28, 2012 JAMES BONINI, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:10-cv-00977-EAS-NMK Doc #: 16 Filed: 03/28/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
an evidentiary hearing, wherein Castillo's former counsel testified that

she advised Castillo to waive the hearing because certification as an adult was a virtual certainty due to his use of a firearm and therefore negotiating an agreement with the State was the best option available. During argument, post-conviction counsel conceded that it was a "big stretch" to suggest that Castillo would not have been certified as an adult and stated she raised the claim to demonstrate his "unsophisticated view of the criminal justice system" and bolster her argument regarding mitigation. Because of this, and because Castillo admitted that he was satisfied with the negotiations, the district court denied this claim as moot. The district court also concluded that Castillo failed to demonstrate deficiency or prejudice. The record supports the district court's determinations, and we conclude that it did not err by denying this claim.
See NRS 62B.390(2)(a)(2) (in most cases, the juvenile court shall certify a child as an adult if he is charged with an offense involving the use of a firearm), see also Doleman v. State, 112 Nev. 843, 848, 921 P.2d 278, 280- 81 (1996) (counsel's tactical decisions are virtually unchallengeable).

Second, Castillo contends that the district court erred by denying his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to present witnesses at sentencing to testify about Castillo's low intelligence, cognitive immaturity, and troubled upbringing. After hearing testimony from the newly offered witnesses, the district court concluded that Castillo failed to demonstrate deficiency or prejudice because trial counsel had presented mitigation evidence and the sentence would not have been different had he presented the new witnesses. The record supports the district court's determinations, and we conclude that it did not err by denying this claim.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947AJ. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

, J. Hardesty

)% 143 J. Douglas

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Mary Lou Wilson Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

'The fast track statement submitted by Castillo fails to comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) because the footnotes are not "in the same size and typeface as the body of the brief," NRAP 32(a)(5). Counsel is cautioned that future failure to comply with this court's briefing requirements may result in the imposition of sanctions. 

### See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3

(0) 1947A
No. 56069.

protest 158753-K (Tampa).

#### Simon Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Quarterly Report of WTTJ Corp, on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kris Kottmeier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and December 31, 2014 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of WTTJ Corp.  July 27, 2015By:/s/ Kris KottmeierKris KottmeierChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51360 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MAGDELENO REYMUNDO RIVAS-HERNANDEZ, also known as Reynaldo Garcia, also known as Magdaleno Rivas, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-685-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Magdeleno Reymundo Rivas-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sub-Urban Brands, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Jack Mott, the
      Chief Financial Officer of Sub-Urban Brands, Inc., does hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section .1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company as of
      and
      for the periods covered by the Report.





Dated:
      August 24, 2006




/s/
      Jack
      Mott





Chief
      Financial Officer