alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer,

As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906
Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay Creasey, Jr., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Toys R Us Property Company II, LLC (the Company) for the annual period ended January 28, 2012, filed on
April 27, 2012 (the Report), as amended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date of
the filing of the Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 7, 2013



|                                                                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                                                                                             
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr. President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Before the Second Division,

October 7, 1944

No. 49743.

#### Protests 915351-G, etc., of American Straw Goods Co. (New York).

*292Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain hats are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) and that others consist of ramie hats similar to those involved in Abstract 47291. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as to the hats in question. •
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8854 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8854

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the provision of 
 certain additional burial benefits for individuals for whom an urn or 
              plaque is furnished, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2024

  Mr. Yakym introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the provision of 
 certain additional burial benefits for individuals for whom an urn or 
              plaque is furnished, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Veterans' Final Resting 
Place Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL BURIAL 
              BENEFITS WHEN COST OF URN OR PLAQUE IS REIMBURSED.

    Section 2306(h) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``If the Secretary'' and 
        inserting ``Except as provided in paragraph (3), if the 
        Secretary'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (5) as 
        paragraphs (4) through (6), respectively; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
        paragraph (3):
    ``(3) Paragraph (2) shall not apply with respect to an urn or 
plaque furnished under paragraph (1) on or after January 5, 2021, if a 
non-Department entity reimburses the Secretary for the cost of the urn 
or plaque.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 333-170379) pertaining to the 2006 Share Incentive Plan, 2008 Share Incentive Plan, 2009 Share Incentive Plan, and the 2010 Share Incentive Plan of China Kanghui Holdings of our report dated June 3, 2011, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of China Kanghui Holdings included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

 

/s/    Ernst & Young Hua Ming 

Shanghai, People’s Republic of China 

June 3, 2011
July 19, 1940

No. 44135.

#### Protest 987608-G of H. C. Capwell Co.

Application by Government for rehearing denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00172]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9018-8]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 12/29/2014 Through 01/02/2015
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice:

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20140384, Draft EIS, FAA, AK, Angoon Airport Project, Comment 
Period Ends: 03/11/2015, Contact: Leslie Grey 907-271-5453
EIS No. 20140385, Final EIS, BLM, NV, Long Canyon Mine, Review Period 
Ends: 02/09/2015, Contact: Whitney Wirthlin, 775-861-6568
EIS No. 20150000, Draft Supplement, GSA, VA, USDOS Foreign Affairs 
Security Training Center (FASTC), Comment Period Ends: 02/23/2015, 
Contact: Myles Vaughan 215-756-5948

    Dated: January 6, 2015.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2015-00172 Filed 1-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, District Judge for the United States ***

District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTORIA DEL CARMEN MONTIEL

CRUZ; GUILLERMO CUELLAR

CARRILLO,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-70656

Agency Nos. A078-643-380

 A027-712-756

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District

Judge.*** 

FILED

FEB 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Victoria del Carmen Montiel Cruz and her spouse Guillermo Cuellar Carrillo

are natives and citizens of Mexico. They petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ denial, as untimely, of their motion to reopen based on their

claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. 

Petitioners’ motion to reopen was filed late; the final administrative decision

was rendered on February 11, 2005 and Petitioners filed their motion to reopen on

November 3, 2006. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (requiring filing of a motion to

reopen “no later than 90 days after the date on which the final administrative

decision was rendered in the proceeding sought to be reopened”). Equitable tolling

does not apply since Petitioners did not demonstrate the required due diligence. 

See Socop-Gonzalez v. I.N.S., 272 F.3d 1176, 1193 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc)

(explaining that equitable tolling applies when “despite all due diligence, the party

invoking equitable tolling is unable to obtain vital information bearing on the

existence of the claim”) (citations, internal quotation marks, and brackets omitted). 

The hearing before the Immigration Judge took place in December 2003. At that

time, Petitioners knew of what counsel did that they now claim was ineffective. 

They thus had the information necessary to bring their ineffective assistance of

counsel claim in 2003, but only filed their motion to reopen in 2006, more than a

year after the administrative decision. 
3

Petition DENIED.
# C_2007140EN.01002102.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 May 2007 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-99/05) (1)

1

(Fisheries - Regulation (EC) No 494/2002 - Conservation of the resources of the sea - Legal basis - Principle of non-discrimination - Obligation to state reasons)

(2007/C 140/35)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. van Rijn, F. Jimeno Fernández and S. Pardo Quintillán, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 494/2002 of 19 March 2002 establishing additional technical measures for the recovery of the stock of hake in ICES sub-areas III, IV, V, VI and VII and ICES divisions VIII a, b, d, e (OJ 2002 L 77, p. 8)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 144, 15.6.2002 (formerly Case C-165/02).

1

---
No. 64273.

protest 58/25557 (Detroit).

#### John V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-16-00435-CR

Style: Jonathan Rawlins v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: October 31, 2016

Type of motion: Appellant’s Motion for a Second Extension of Time to File Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant’s counsel Steven A. Hershkowitz

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: August 12, 2016

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due Date: October 31, 2016

Date Requested: December 5, 2016 (115 days from original deadline)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: December 5, 2016.

 No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

On September 1, 2016, the Clerk of this Court granted the first extension by appellant’s

new counsel until October 31, 2016, to file appellant’s brief, but with no further 

extensions. Because the trial court only appointed Mr. Hershkowitz as counsel on 

August 10, 2016, and counsel’s second extension contends that the trial records are 

fairly voluminous and he is in a 2-person firm, this extension is granted, but no 

further extensions will be granted given the total length of time requested. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not filed by December 5, 

2016, the Court will abate this appeal for a late-brief hearing. See id. 38.8(b)(2).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually 

Date: November 8, 2016
# C_2007140EN.01000802.xml

| 23.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 20 March 2007 — 01051 Telekom GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Federal Republic of Germany)

(Case C-154/07)

(2007/C 140/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: 01051 Telekom GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Defendant:

Intervener: Deutsche Telekom AG

Intervener:

Questions referred

Are Commission Directive 90/388/EEC of 28 June 1990 on competition in the markets for telecommunications services (Competition Directive) (1) and Directive 97/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 on interconnection in telecommunications with regard to ensuring universal service and interoperability through application of the principles of Open Network Provision (ONP) (Interconnection Directive) (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the national regulatory authority is precluded from requiring, in 2003, the operator of a network which is interconnected with a public local telecommunications network to pay a contribution to the market-dominant operator of the local network in order to compensate him for the deficit incurred as a result of providing the local loop?

1

2

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative:

Is the incompatibility with Community law of such a requirement, which is a provision of domestic law, to be taken into account by the national court in proceedings concerning the approval of a contribution by the interconnected network operator?

---

(1)  OJ 1990 L 192, p. 10.

1

(2)  OJ 1997 L 199, p. 32.

2

---
# C_2007155EN.01001501.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 7 May 2007 — Flughafen Köln/Bonn GmbH v Hauptzollamt Köln

(Case C-226/07)

(2007/C 155/28)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Flughafen Köln/Bonn GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Köln

Defendant:

Question referred

Is Article 14(1)(a) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an undertaking which used gas oil on which tax was paid coming within heading 2710 of the Combined Nomenclature in order to produce electricity, and which has claimed a refund of that tax, can rely directly on this provision?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
  1.
    
    The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NeuStar, Inc. for the quarter ended March
31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    Information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NeuStar,
Inc.
 May 11, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey E. GanekJeffrey E. GanekChief Executive OfficerMay 11, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Paul S. LalljiePaul S. LalljieInterim Chief Financial Officer
No. 59120.

protests 191771-K, 234036-K, and 234039-K (Philadelphia).

#### Albert F. Maurer Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ingots of remelted white metal scrap, a nonferrous metal scrap, not ores, nor concentrates, nor virgin or crude metal; that said scrap was imported to be used in remanufacture by melting; that, after importation, it was melted and manufactured into other articles; and that there had been compliance with the regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, *supra.*Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*as extended by Public Law 221, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
|  March 27, 2012 |                                                |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                 |                                                |
|                 |                                                |
|                 | By:  /S/ WEI SHI                               |
|                 |                                                |
|                 | Wei Shi                                             |
|                 | Vice President - Treasury, Finance & Analytics  |
|                 | Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of the |
|                 | Toyota Auto Receivables 2010-B Owner Trust          |

| - 23 -  |
|--------------|
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of The Real Hip-Hop Network, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A amendment for the period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report) and pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Atonn F. Muhammad, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Company’s Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual Report and the results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Annual Report.








October 23, 2013








/ S /Atonn F. MuhammadAtonn F. Muhammad

Chief Executive Officer




/ S /Atonn F. MuhammadAtonn F. Muhammad

Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8986 

To amend the Clean Air Act with respect to designating and redesignating 

nonattainment areas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2024 

Mr. PFLUGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act with respect to designating 

and redesignating nonattainment areas, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Show the Data Act 

5 of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION AND REDESIGNATION OF AREAS. 

7 (a) AREAS SUBJECT TO NONATTAINMENT DESIGNA8 TION AND REDESIGNATION.—Section 107(d) of the Clean 

9 Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7407(d)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8986 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘for any 

2 area’’ and inserting ‘‘for any area within the State’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph 

5 (3), by striking ‘‘or interstate area’’. 

6 (b) AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA REQUIRED.— 

7 Section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7407(d)) 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

10 (A) in the heading of paragraph (2), by in11 serting ‘‘; AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA RE12 QUIRED’’ after ‘‘PUBLICATION OF DESIGNA13 TIONS AND REDESIGNATIONS’’; and 

14 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(C) AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA RE16 QUIRED.—Any designation or redesignation of an 

17 area (or portion thereof) under this subsection shall 

18 be based on air quality monitoring data from Fed19 eral monitors within the State in which the area (or 

20 portion thereof) is located.’’; and 

21 (2) in paragraph (3)(A)— 

22 (A) by striking ‘‘on the basis of air quality 

23 data, planning and control considerations, or 

24 any other air quality-related considerations the 

25 Administrator deems appropriate’’ and insertVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:09 Aug 14, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8986.IH H8986

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8986 IH

1 ing ‘‘on the basis of air quality monitoring data 

2 from Federal monitors within a State’’; and 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘the Governor of any State 

4 that available information indicates’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘the Governor of such State that such air 

6 quality monitoring data from Federal monitors 

7 within such State indicate’’. 

8 (c) REDESIGNATION PROCESS.—Section 

9 107(d)(3)(C) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

10 7407(d)(3)(C)) is amended— 

11 (1) by striking ‘‘shall promulgate the’’ and in12 serting ‘‘shall, after consultation with the Governor, 

13 promulgate the’’; and 

14 (2) by striking ‘‘shall promulgate such’’ and in15 serting ‘‘shall, subject to the provisions of section 

16 553 through 557 of title 5 of the United States 

17 Code (relating to notice and comment), promulgate 

18 such’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5849]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,048]


Emerson Network Power, Formerly Artesyn Communication Products, 
Madison, WI; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 1, 2007 in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Emerson Network 
Power, formerly Artesyn Communications Products, Madison, Wisconsin.
    The petitioner has requested that this petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-5849 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P