alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2005 of Evergreen Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers does hereby certify that to the best of his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and
          result of operations of the Company.

| | Date:   October 13, 2005 | /s/ Timothy G. Wahlberg
| | ------------------------ | -----------------------
| | Timothy G. Wahlberg     
| | President               

| | Date:   October 13, 2005 | /s/ John A. Irwin
| | ------------------------ | -----------------
| | John A. Irwin           
| | Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EX-31.1
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF JOHN FLEMING

             RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, John Fleming, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GameZnFlix,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for
the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: March 30, 2005                  /s/ John Fleming
                                       John Fleming,
                                       Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB
filed by New Century Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in
that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                   |  |                           |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | NEW CENTURY BANCORP, INC.
|                   |  |                          
|Date: May 13, 2004 |  | By:                       |  | /s/ Lisa F. Campbell                             
|                   |  |                           |  | Lisa F. Campbell                                 
|                   |  |                           |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ER07-312-000] 

On January 8, 2007, the Commission issued a Notice of Issuance in the above-docketed proceeding. The notice established a period for filing protests or motions to intervene in response to Dogwood Energy, LLC's requests for blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Dogwood. 

By this notice, the date for filing motions to intervene or protests is shortened to and including January 24, 2007. 

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-565 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(c)

                       CONSENT OF BARRY G. SKOLNICK, ESQ.

    I hereby consent to the reference to my name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the prospectus included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 for certain variable annuity insurance
contracts issued through ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account A and
included in the prospectus included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 for certain variable annuity insurance
contracts issued through ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account B of
Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company, File Nos. 33-43654 and 33-45380.

                                               /s/ BARRY G. SKOLNICK
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                                 Barry G. Skolnick
                                           PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL

April 27, 2001
file:///W|/RULES/In-Process%20Reviews/ANTELOPE%20VALLEY%201515-10/1515-10%20461a/District%20Email.htm

From: Tracy Walters [twalters@mdaqmd.ca.gov] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:05 AM To: Au, Patrick@ARB Cc: Steckel.Andrew@epamail.epa.gov; Alan De Salvio; Bret Banks; Vickie Rausch Subject: Amendment of AVAQMD 461 Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing

Attachments: AV461 clean d2.doc; AV461 clean d2.pdf; 461 SRFinal.pdf; 461_8-19-08 minute.PDF; 461_9-16-08 cancel.PDF; 461_10-21-08 minute.PDF; 461_reso.PDF; Rule Evaluation.doc; SIP Checklist.doc On October 21, 2008 the Governing Board of the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) amended Rule 461- Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing . Attached for your review are the following documents pertaining to the adoption:

* Rule 461, clean version (word/pdf) * Rule 461, iterated versions (included in Staff Report Appendix A) * Final Staff Report * Proof of Publication (included in Staff Report, Appendix B) * Signed Notice of Exemption, Los Angeles County (included in Staff Report, Appendix D) * Set Date Minute Item, August 19, 2008 Official Copy * Cancellation Notice September 16, 2008 * Set Date Minute Item, October 21, 2008 Official Copy * Resolution 08-08, Official Copy * CARB Rule Evaluation Form

* SIP Completeness Checklist

This Rule is included in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and therefore requires submission to USEPA.

Thank you for your assistance. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I can provide any additional information.

Tracy Walters Air Quality Specialist (760) 245-1661 x 6122 twalters@mdaqmd.ca.gov

file:///W|/RULES/In-Process%20Reviews/ANTELOPE%20VALLEY%201515-10/1515-10%20461a/District%20Email.htm [3/17/2009 10:01:48 AM]
##### 



Exhibit 10.7
 SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
  
 Hines REIT Properties, L.P. Revolving Credit Facility
    provided




---



##### 



Signature Page Follows .
 2




---



##### 



HINES REIT PROPERTIES, L.P.By:
    
    Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., its
General PartnerBy:Name:Title:HINES ADVISORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBy:
    
    Hines Advisors GP LLC, its General PartnerBy:Name:Title:HINES INTERESTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBy:
    
    Hines Holdings, Inc., its General PartnerBy:Name:Title:
 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as AgentBy:Name:Title:
July 23 , 2012

**EPA Technical Memorandum Subject**  : Analy sis of Argonne National Laboratory ’s HEV Data to Evaluate Methods for Determining Nominal Voltage **From** : James Sanchez, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency



## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the definition of nominal voltage in chapter 5 of the technical support document the follow data anal ys is was done. The data used was 10 Hz battery current and voltage data for a 2010 Toy ota Prius, 2010 Ford Fusion Hy brid and 2011 Hy

undai Sonata Hy

brid tested at Argonne National Laboratory
. The two methods for determine nominal voltage were as follows. The first method was averaging the battery voltage just after “ key
- on ” with the battery voltage just prior to “ key
- off

. Id eally the voltage measurement would be taken with no load or zero current to from the battery, but since this is not possible the data was used to determine a reasonable limit for the current during the voltage measurement. Figure 1 and 2 is a sample of the current and voltage data at the beginning and end of a test over the UDDS.

Figure 1
- Battery

voltage and current as a percent of maximum current at the start of the UDDS cy cle. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

- 20% - 15% - 10% - 5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40**V o** **l t** **a g** **e %** **C u** **r r** **e n** **t**

**Time (sec)**

Current (% of Absolute Maximum Current) Battery Voltage (V)Figure 2
- Battery voltage and current as a percent of maximum current at the end of the UDDS cy cle. The second method that was evaluated was averaging the battery voltage over the full UDDS when the battery

current was less than 3% of the absolute maximum current during the test. The result s turned out to be ve ry similar to the average of the initial and final voltage but were slightly higher due to the voltage roll off a fter each charging event. Table 1 is a summary of the two methods. The column labe led “Avg. OC Voltage” are the results from method 2. Table 1

– Summary

of nominal voltage results from the two described methods. Vehicle Test Initial

Voltage Final Voltage Initial Current % of Max Final Current

% of Max Avg. of

Initial and Final Avg. OC

V oltage % Difference

in Methods

2011 Fusion Hy brid 1 271.1 272.1
- 0.1
- 0.2 271.6 275.6 1% 2 270.2 272.1
- 0.1 0.0 271.1 276.7 2% 3 270.9 271.8
- 0.1 0.0 271.4 276.7 2% 4 270.5 272.2
- 0.1 0.0 271.3 277.0 2%
2010 Prius 1 221.8 224.5 1.8 0.9 223.2 228.1 2% 2 223.4 224.8 1.8 0.8 224.1 228.6 2% 3 223.7 224.2 1.9 0.1 224.0 228.4 2% 2011 1 283.0 281.7 2.5 1.4 282.3 284.0 1% 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

- 20% - 15% - 10% - 5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

1340 1345 1350 1355 1360 1365 1370 1375 1380 1385 1390**V o** **l t** **a g** **e %** **C u** **r r** **e n** **t**

**Time (sec)**

Current (% of Absolute Maximum Current) Battery Voltage (V)Sonata

Hy brid 2 280.7 281.8 2.4 1.5 281.3 283.9 1% 3 280.9 282.2 1.9 1.5 281.6 284.2 1% 4 281.4 281.2 1.7 2.2 281.3 283.8 1%
O pinion filed September 19 , 202 4



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ 

### No. 11

- 2 4

- 00238

- C R

__________


### IN RE JUSTIN W. FULLER

Original Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Relator, Justin W. Fuller, filed this original proceeding pro se seeking relief against the Erath County District Clerk 1 (Respondent)

. According to Relator ’s petition for writ of mandamus, h is constitutional rights have been violated

. Relator requests that this court order the d istrict c lerk to “ perform a legal duty, ” specifically, to “[f]ile any and all motion[s] mailed to ” the d istrict c lerk’s o ffice, and asserts that
the d istrict c lerk’s o ffice “cannot [r]ecommend whether to file a certain pleading.”

1 Relator seeks relief against the “Clerk of Court .” Although Erath County has separate ly elected d istrict and c ounty c lerks , Relator served the d istrict c lerk with his petition , and attached a document in support of his petition from the d istrict c lerk’s o ffice

.2 To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must establish that : (1) the act sought to be compelled is a ministerial act not involving a discretionary or judicial decision; and (2) there is no adequate remedy at law to redress the alleged harm

. In
re Meza , 611 S.W.3d 383, 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 2020) (orig. proceeding).
T his court’s authority to exercise original jurisdiction is limited. See T EX

. C ONST . art. V, §§ 5, 6 (intermediate courts of appeals only have original jurisdiction as prescribed by law); T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2023) (limited writ powers granted to courts of appeals). We do not have writ jurisdiction over a
district clerk’s office unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction in another proceeding. In re Smith , 263 S.W.3d 93, 95 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding); s ee G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221. Relator has not demonstrated that our jurisdiction is implicated here, or that
the Erath County District Clerk’s Office is a party against whom we may issue a writ
under the circumstances. As a result, we have no jurisdiction as an intermediate appellate court to address this original proceeding

. T o the extent Relator seeks relief against the d istrict c lerk and the d istrict c lerk’s o ffice, we lack jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

JOHN M. BAILEY
CHIEF JUSTICE

September 19 , 202 4 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trott er , J. , and Will iams , J.
May 2, 1949

No. 53118.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 132170-K, 132171-K, and 132172-K.

Abstract 52997. Motion of Government for rehearing granted.
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            | Summit Hotel OP, LP                                                                               |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | By: Summit Hotel GP, LLC, its general partner                                                     |
|                            | By: Summit Hotel Properties, Inc., its sole member                                                |
|                            |                                                                                              |
| Date:  March 31, 2011 | By:   /s/  Stuart J. Becker                                              |
|                            | Stuart J. BeckerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coast Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Brian F. Grimes, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Brian F. Grimes                  
|                        |  |     |  | Brian F. Grimes, Executive Vice      
|                        |  |     |  | President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Chas. Tuohey, App’lt, *v.*Samuel Wilde *et al.,*Resp’ts.

Appeal from order made by Hon. Geo. W. Van Hoesen, J.

*Ordered,*that the order appealed from be affirmed, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6357]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Parts 611, 612, 614, 615, 618, 619, 620, and 630

RIN 3052-AC19


Organization; Standards of Conduct and Referral of Known or 
Suspected Criminal Violations; Loan Policies and Operations; Funding 
and Fiscal Affairs, Loan Policies and Operations, and Funding 
Operations; General Provisions; Definitions; Disclosure to 
Shareholders; Disclosure to Investors in System-Wide and Consolidated 
Bank Debt Obligations of the Farm Credit System; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final rule 
under parts 611, 612, 614, 615, 618, 619, 620, and 630 on February 2, 
2006. This final rule amended our regulations affecting the governance 
of the Farm Credit System and became effective on April 5, 2006 (71 FR 
18168, April 11, 2006), except for the amendments to Sec. Sec.  
611.210(a)(2), 611.220(a)(2)(i) and (ii), 611.325, and 620.21(d)(2). 
This document announces the effective date of those delayed portions of 
the rule.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date for the amendments to Sec. Sec.  
611.210(a)(2), 611.220(a)(2)(i) and (ii), 611.325, and 620.21(d)(2), 
published February 2, 2006, at 71 FR 5740, is April 5, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Van Meter, Deputy Director, 
Office of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 
22102-5090, (703) 883-4232, TTY (703) 883-4434; or Laura D. McFarland, 
Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, 
McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TTY (703) 883-4020.
(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

    Dated: April 2, 2007.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. E7-6357 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
----

|   | By:    | /s/ Gary R. Vaughan    |
|--------|--------|------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Gary R. Vaughan  |
|   |   | Its: Managing Director |
|   |   |                   |
|   | By:    | /s/ David Co           |
|   |   | Name: David Co         |
|   |   | Its: Director          |
|   |   |                   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Matt Bowen         |
|   |   | Name: Matt Bowen       |
|   |   | Its: Managing Director |
|   |   |                   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Kevin Fischer      |
|   |   | Name: Kevin Fischer    |
|   |   | Its: Director          |
|   |   |                   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Robert Frier       |
|   |   | Name: Robert Frier     |
|   |   | Its: Director          |

|   |   |                |
|--------|--------|---------------------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Jenna Kaufman   |
|   |   | Name: Jenna Kaufman |
|   |   | Its: Director       |

| - 18 -  |
|--------------|