alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rion B. Needs, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Reid E. Simpson, Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ RION B. NEEDSRion B. NeedsPresident andChief Executive OfficerApril 29, 2011/s/ REID E. SIMPSONReid E. SimpsonSenior Vice President-Finance andChief Financial OfficerApril 29, 2011
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL

OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provide
Commerce, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Strauss, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 29,
2005



/s/ William StraussWilliam StraussChief Executive Officer




In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Provide Commerce, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rex E. Bosen, Vice
President, Finance and Accounting and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. That information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 29, 2005



/s/ Rex E. BosenRex E. BosenVice President, Finance and Accountingand Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5955]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes approval of the Tribal-State Compact 
between the State of Oklahoma and Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma.

DATES: Effective Date: April 2, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of the approved Tribal-State Compact for the purpose of engaging in 
Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. This Compact authorizes 
the Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma to engage in certain Class III 
gaming activities, provides for certain geographical exclusivity, 
limits the number of gaming machines at existing racetracks, and 
prohibits non-tribal operation of certain machines and covered games.

Carl J. Artman,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. E7-5955 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

of Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted by Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief executive officer of Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ H. Dean Jones II



H. Dean Jones II

President

(Chief Executive Officer)

Boardwalk Pipelines, LLC

July 29, 2005
No. 50567.

#### Protest 948837-G (B) of United China & Glass Co. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bonbon dishes the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Butler Bros.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 444, C. D. 512), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith and following the decision cited, which was affirmed in effect in *United States*v. *Butler Bros.*(33 C. C. P. A. 22, C. A. D. 310), the merchandise was held properly dutiable at 70 percent ad valorem under paragraph 212 withput the additional assessment of 10 cents per dozen pieces.
Before the First Division,

January 9, 1940

No. 42972.

#### Protests 778811-G, etc., of Strauss Bros. & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20) paperweights plated with silver were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. Following Abstract 34593 the court held the novelty brushes in question dutiable at only 50 percent under paragraph 1506. Protests sustained in part.
U

.S

. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration
April 27, 2015

Mr. Brian Richardet Manager, Product Certification Cessna Aircraft Company P.O. Box 7704 Wichita, Kansas 67277-7704

Dear Mr. Richardet: Exemption No. 7625B Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S.W

. Renton , Washington 98057-3356

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-200 1-9982

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for an amendment to Exemption No. 7625A. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

### The Basis for Our Decision By letter no. L390-15-0342 dated January 26 , 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) , on behalf of Cessna Aircraft Company, to add Cessna Model 680A airplanes to Exemption No. 7625. That exemption provides relief from§ 25.785(b) of Title 14, Code ofFederal Regulations for persons on Cessna Model 680 airplanes occupying multipleplace, side-facing seats during takeoff and landing

. FAA policy statement ANM-03-115-30, "Policy Statement on Side-Facing Seats on Transport Category Airplanes ," dated May 6, 2005 , describes dynamic test procedures and pass/fail criteria that are considered for transport-category airplanes to provide an appropriate level of safety for occupants ofboth multiple-place side-facing seats, certified by exemptions , and single-place side-facing seats, certified by special conditions. FAA policy statement PS-ANM-25-03-Rl , "Technical Criteria for Approving Side-Facing Seats," dated November 5, 2012 , updated our policy on dynamic-test procedures and pass/fail criteria for single- and multiple-place side-facing seats. Because the proposed Cessna 680A side-facing divan installation was an in-work program at the time of issuance ofpolicy statement PS-ANM-25-03-R1 , the applicable guidance to this project is ANM-03-115-30. Your letter includes no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.2
Federal Register Publication The FAA has determined that good cause exists for waiving the requirement for Federal Regi ster publication for public comment because the request is identical in all material respects to previously granted exemptions , and the amended exemption, if granted , would not set a precedent. Our Decision The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance ofExemption No

. 7625B remains valid with respect to this amendment and is in the public interest. Therefore , under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701 , which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me , I grant your petition for exemption. The Effect of Our Decision Our decision amends Exemption No. 7625A to include the Cessna Model 680A airplane among the exemption ' s affected models

. All conditions and limitations of Exemption No

. 7625A remain the same. This letter must be attached to , and is a part of , Exemption No. 7625A

. Sincerely,



# L~~ Michael Kaszycki Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
IoN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICTo COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

SAMUEL WOLFORD,

Petitioner,

v. Civil Action 2:12-cv-0461

Criminal No. 2:11-cr-0016

Judge Smith

Magistrate Judge King

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

This is an action under 28 U.S.§ 2255 in which petitioner asserts,

inter alia, claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. This

matter is now before the Court on respondent’s motion to hold the action

in abeyance pending petitioner’s execution of a written waiver of the

attorney-client privilege as it relates to the claims asserted in this

action. Doc. No. 37. Petitioner opposes the motion, Doc. No. 38, taking

the position that counsel should instead be appointed for him and an

evidentiary hearing should be scheduled.

Petitioner has already implicitly waived his attorney-client

privilege as it relates to his claims of ineffective assistance of

counsel. See In re Lott, 424 F.3d 446, 452-54 (6th Cir. 2005)(citing

Johnson v. Alabama, 256 F.3d 1156, 1178 (11th Cir. 2001)(“By alleging that

his attorneys provided ineffective assistance of counsel in their choice

of a defense strategy, [Petitioner] put at issue – and thereby waived –

any privilege that might apply to the contents of his conversations with

those attorneys to the extent those conversations bore on his attorneys’

strategic choices”)(other citations omitted)). “It has long been the

rule in the federal courts that, where a habeas petitioner raises a claim

Case: 2:11-cr-00016-GCS-NMK Doc #: 39 Filed: 07/02/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
of ineffective assistance of counsel, he waives the attorney-client

privilege as to all communications with his allegedly ineffective

lawyer.” Bittaker v. Woodford, 331 F.3d 715, 716 (9th Cir. 2003); see

also United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.3d 1285, 1292 (2nd Cir.

1991)(attorney-client “privilege may implicitly be waived when defendant

asserts a claim that in fairness requires examination of protected

communications”); Tasby v. United States, 504 F.2d 332, 336 (8th Cir.

1975)(“Surely a client is not free to make various allegations of

misconduct and incompetence while the attorney’s lips are sealed by

invocation of the attorney-client privilege.”). The Court will

therefore grant respondent’s request that petitioner formally waive the

privilege.

Respondent’s request to hold this case in abeyance pending

petitioner’s written waiver of his attorney-client privilege, Doc. No.

37, is GRANTED.

Petitioner is DIRECTED to submit a written waiver of his attorneyclient privilege as it pertains to the allegations of ineffective

assistance of counsel actually asserted in this action. The written

waiver must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. 

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of Petitioner’s claims of

ineffective assistance of counsel. 

 s/Norah McCann King 

 Norah McCann King

 United States Magistrate Judge

Date: July 2, 2012 

2

Case: 2:11-cr-00016-GCS-NMK Doc #: 39 Filed: 07/02/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony J. Orlando, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Holdings LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 3, 2006         By:                   /s/ Anthony J. Orlando    Anthony J. Orlando    Chief Executive Officer and President  
45
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8870 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8870

  To rename the portion of United States Highway 75 between President 
   George Bush Turnpike and United States Highway 380 as the ``U.S. 
    Congressman and Prisoner of War Sam Johnson Memorial Highway''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2024

   Mr. Self introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To rename the portion of United States Highway 75 between President 
   George Bush Turnpike and United States Highway 380 as the ``U.S. 
    Congressman and Prisoner of War Sam Johnson Memorial Highway''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF U.S. CONGRESSMAN AND PRISONER OF WAR SAM 
              JOHNSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY.

    (a) Designation.--The portion of United States Highway 75 between 
President George Bush Turnpike and United States Highway 380 currently 
designated as ``Sam Johnson Highway'', shall, after the date of 
enactment of this Act, be known and designated as the ``U.S. 
Congressman and Prisoner of War Sam Johnson Memorial Highway''.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the portion of 
the highway referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the U.S. Congressman and Prisoner of War Sam Johnson 
Memorial Highway.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN PITCHER and REID MOORE, JR.,

Appellants,

v.

DAVID J. ZAPPITELL, ZAPPITELL & KAPRAL, P.A., and ZAPPITELL 

LAW FIRM, P.L.,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-3202

[May 17, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Meenu Sasser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2012-CA-007747-

XXXX-MB.

Reid Moore, Jr., Palm Beach, for appellants.

Kerri C. Smith of the Law Office of Kerri C. Smith, P.A., Boca Raton; 

and David J. Zappitell of the Zappitell Law Firm, P.L., Delray Beach, for 

appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
FAA 333 exemption

I am writing this petition in order to operate our commercial drone for our construction 

company. We build projects all over the world that we enjoy getting aerial footage of to 

share with our clients and building owners. 

The benefit of seeking this exemption would be geared towards the owners or new 

buildings as well as their potential clients. Saving time and money during the project for 

our owners, as well as keeping everyone safe while on the project. With a drone, we are 

able to view different aspects and angles of a job that we would normally not be able to 

see.

We take safety at our company at the highest regards. We will be using the drone to 

also oversee safety on each job site, to make sure every procedure is followed.

We understand the rules of flying and take those into full regards when operating the 

unmanned aircraft.
No. 61966.

#### Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 312761-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(b)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Registration
Statement No. 33-43654 of ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account A on
Form N-4 of our reports on (i) ML Life Insurance Company of New York dated
February 27, 2001, and (ii) ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account A
dated February 16, 2001, appearing in the Statement of Additional Information,
which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under
the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is a part of such Registration
Statement.

<TABLE>
<S>                                      <C>
       /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
</TABLE>

New York, New York
April 26, 2001
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


    WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Global Energy Group, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to such person's knowledge, on the date
hereof:

         (a)      the Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended December
                  31, 2001 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
                  Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act or 1934; and

         (b)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Joseph H. Richardson
-----------------------------------------
Name:  Joseph H. Richardson
Title: Chief Executive Officer
November 26, 2002


/s/ Peter E. Toomey
-----------------------------------------
Name:    Peter E. Toomey
Title: Chief Financial Officer
November 26, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0729

____________________________________________________________

CHRISTOPHER WAGNER,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Upon reading and filing the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to 

File Opening Brief and Affidavit in Support by attorney Penelope S. Strong, and 

good cause appearing, wherefore:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and the 

deadline set to file the Opening Brief in this case is hereby extended from February 

26, 2020, to April 15, 2020.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 17 2020

03/17/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0729