alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1


                                                    Robert L. White & Associates
988 Ohio Pike, Suite 2
Cincinnati, Ohio 45245
Phone (513) 943-1040
Fax (513) 943-7760


April 25, 2001





VIA FAX
Office of the Chief Accountant
SECPS Letter File
Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 11-3
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen,

I have read the disclosure in Item 4 of the Form 8-K/A dated April 25, 2001. I
agree with the disclosure.

Sincerely,



/s/ Robert L. White


Robert L. White
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Dale Paisley, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/ A of Healthmed Services Ltd.;





2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.








By:
/s/ Dale PaisleyDate: January 12, 2011

Dale PaisleyPrincipal Accounting Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PEBBLE HILLS PLAZA, LTD/ASLM 

LTD,

 Appellant,

v.

ASLM LTD/ PEBBLE HILLS PLAZA

LTD,

State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00128-CV

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2022DCV1639)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee/Cross Appellant’s third motion for extension of time 

within which to file the brief until October 13, 2022. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE APPELLEE/CROSS APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE 

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT. 

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Casey S. Stevenson, the Appellee/Cross Appellant’s

attorney, prepare the Appellee/Cross Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or 

before October 13, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1507]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

WHEREAS, the Greater Miami Foreign-Trade Zone, Incorporated, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 32, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand the zone to include a site in Medley, Florida, and to restore zone status to one acre at Site 1, within the Miami Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 32-2006; filed 8/10/06);

                    WHEREAS, notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (71 FR 48909, 8/22/06) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

WHEREAS, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby orders:

The application to expand FTZ 32 is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

                    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th                     day of March 2007.                

David M. Spooner,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-5056 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Case No. 9,877.

#### In re MOSS.

[19 N. B. R. 132.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

April 23, 1879.

Bankruptcy — Stock Broker — Merchant or Tradesman — Failure to Keep Books —Discharge.

The bankrupt was a stock and gold broker, but was not a member of the Stock Exchange. He took orders for the. purchase and sale of stocks and gold, but conducted the business exclusively through 'the agency of other brokers, who were members of the exchange, and divided the commissions with them. *Held,*that he was not a merchant or tradesman, within the meaning of the act. and as such disentitled to a discharge for failure to keep books of account.

In bankruptcy.

B. Skaats, for bankrupt

Chas. E. Crowell, for creditor.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

CHOATE, District Judge.

This is an application for the discharge of the bankrupt. The only specification is that, being a “merchant or tradesman,” he kept no books of account. The bankrupt kept no books. The only question is, was he a “tradesman.” within the meaning of the act [of 1867 (14 Stat. 517)] ? Tlie evidence as to the nature of the bankrupt's business is very confused; but, as nearly as it can be made out from his examination, it was as follows: He was a stock and gold broker, but without being a member of the Stock Exchange. He took orders for the purchase and sale of stock and gold, but did not himself execute the orders. He opened accounts in his dwn name, as “agent,” with other brokers, who were members of the exchange, and they bought and sold for him upon his orders, and gave him half the commission usual in such transactions. ' He furnished those for whom he did the business a memorandum of each transaction immediately after it occurred. It did not appear whether his customers knew that he bought’ and sold exclusively through other brokers, nor was there any evidence of concealment. The debts contracted by him consisted chiefly of balances due the brokers through whom he acted, being in reality for excess of his losses over the margins deposited. There were also some debts for borrowed money, and some debts' due to the customers who employed him, for balances on these stock transactions. Upon these facts, I think it clear that the bankrupt was not a “merchant or tradesman,” within the meaning of the act, and as such disentitled to a discharge for failure to keep books of account. The careful discussion of the meaning of the word “tradesman” in recent cases makes it unnecessary to do more than refer to those authorities. In re Coté [Case No. 3,267]; In re Stickney [Id. 13,439]; In re Marston [Id. 9,142]. Discharge granted.
No. 61977.

#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 141317-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
U.S. National Arboretum Plant Introduction

Floral and Nursery Plants Research Unit

U.S. National Arboretum, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 3501 New York Ave., N.E., Washington, DC 20002

The U.S. National Arboretum presents Ilex x attenuata 'Sunny Foster', a

bright, bold, golden holly to highlight the dark corners of your landscape. The

unique yellow variegation of this Foster holly will definitely bring sunshine to your

garden.

Ilex x attenuata 'Sunny Foster'
U.S. National Arboretum Plant Introduction

Floral and Nursery Plants Research Unit

U.S. National Arboretum: www.ars-grin.gov/na/

Botanical Name:

Family:

Hardiness:

Development:

Significance:

Description:

Culture:

Propagation:

Landscape Use:

Availability:

'Sunny Foster' Foster Holly

November 1999

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

Ilex x attenuata Ashe 'Sunny Foster'

(NA 28309; PI 465978)

Aquifoliaceae

U.S.D.A. Zone 7

A variegated leaf mutation was discovered on a plant of Ilex x

attenuata 'Foster No. 2' at the U.S. National Arboretum by William

F. Kosar in 1964. This mutation was propagated and remained

stable during propagation and subsequent years of evaluation. The

new plant was named 'Sunny Foster', registered with the International Registration Authority for Cultivated Ilex, and released

March 9, 1982.

'Sunny Foster' is the only known variegated sport of the popular

Foster holly. The variegation is an indefinite, nonmarginal type

exhibiting a pale yellow color in the upper third of the leaf blade.

Barely noticeable on new young leaves, it intensifies as the leaves

mature. In full sun the foliage color deepens to a golden yellow,

while in dense shade the variegation is less noticeable or absent.

Height and Width: To 30 feet tall. Somewhat slower growing than

'Foster No. 2'.

Habit: Evergreen, loosely branched, narrowly pyramidal, upright

large shrub to small tree.

Foliage: Leaves 1 to 3 inches long and 1 inch wide; margins sometimes wavy with 1–6 lateral spines, with the tip spine the largest.

Bright yellow coloration in direct sun; glossy medium green in

shaded locations.

Flowers: Female. Small, inconspicuous, axillary, white.

Fruit: Red, 5/16 inch in diameter, borne singly or occasionally 2–3

in a cluster on very short lateral branches; persists through winter

unless eaten by wildlife.

'Sunny Foster' is readily adaptable to a wide range of soil types and a

soil pH of 5.5–7.0, with 6.0 the ideal. Soil should be well-drained.

Grows well in full sun to partial shade; yellow variegation is expressed more intensely in full sun.

Roots easily from semi-hardwood to hardwood cuttings taken in

August, under mist, 75 °F bottom heat, 3000–5000 ppm IBA solution,

5–10 second quick dip, in 6–8 weeks.

Specimen, accent plant.

Limited availability through specialty growers.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-366-000]


Vector Pipeline L.P.; Notice of Annual Fuel Use Report

April 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, Vector Pipeline L.P. (Vector) 
tendered for filing an annual report of its monthly fuel use ratios for 
the period January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated 
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve 
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d2b283f2e2203010403083e181d1d021f192d0b081f0e430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cdad9cedfd3f2f0f5f2f9cfe9ececf3eee8dcfaf9eeffb2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6562 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 4, 2019

a1001 

# Order

Clerk October 4, 2019

158392

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158392

COA: 343891

Wayne CC: 07

- 020825

- FC

KAINTE DESHAWN HICKEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of May 22, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals. On order

of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again

considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to

People v Ginther , 390 Mich 436 (1973), to determine whether the defendant was: (1)

denied the effective assistance of trial counsel due to trial counsel ’s alleged failure to call

the alibi witnesses now identified by the defendant, and (2) denied the effective

assistance of appellate counsel on direct appeal due to that attorney’s failure to raise the

alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

W e do not retain jurisdiction.
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MakeMyTrip Limited (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: June 25, 2012

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, and is not being “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subjectto the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
No. 55374.

#### Sandvik Saw & Tool Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 166288-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Case: 2:11-cr-00138-JLG-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 08/05/11 Page: 1 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cr-00138-JLG-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 08/05/11 Page: 2 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cr-00138-JLG-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 08/05/11 Page: 3 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cr-00138-JLG-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 08/05/11 Page: 4 of 4  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T13:46:34-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# Al1 

# REGISTER 

# MEDIA A GANNETI COMPANY 

# AFFIDAVIT
OF PUBLICATION State of Iowa County of Polk, ss.: The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath, states that The Des Moines Register and Tribune Company,

a corporation duly organized and existing under the raws of the State of Iowa, with its principal place of business

In Des Moines, Iowa, the publisher
of 

### THE DES MOINES REGISTER newspaper

of general circulation printed and published

In the City of Des Moines, Polk County, Iowa, and that an advertisement,

a printed copy of which
is attached
as Exhibit "A" and made part of this affidavit, was printed and published in The Des Moines Register on the following dates: Ad No.
Start Date: 

### 0000695490 09/04/15 Copy of Advertisement Exhibit "A"



### Run Dates:

Cost: 

### 09/04/15, 09/21/15

$37.82 Subscribed and sworn to before me by said affiant this 22th day of September, 2015 

# ANDREA HOUGHTON COMMISSION


# No. 753956 

# COMMISSION EXPIRES ?..Q **~r**
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Sprouls certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 6, 2009



> By:
> 
>                                                                                         
> 
>                                                                                         /s/ John R. SproulsJohn R. Sprouls
> 
>                                                                                             Principal Executive Officer
Before the Third Division,

March 30, 1950

No. 54169.

#### M. A. Hoenecke *v.*United States,

protests 101348-K and 102546-K (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 8.1

Significant Subsidiaries



|                                      |  |                        |  |                    |     |  
|------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------ | --- | -
|Name of entity                        |  | Place of incorporation |  | Ownership interest |    
|1. MakeMyTrip Inc.                    |  | Delaware, USA          |  |                    | 100 | %
|2. MakeMyTrip (India) Private Limited |  | India                  |  |                    | 100 | %
|3. Luxury Tours & Travel Pte Ltd      |  | Singapore              |  |                    | 100 | %
|4. MakeMyTrip FZ-LLC                  |  | United Arab Emirates   |  |                    | 100 | %
|5. Luxury Tours (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.   |  | Malaysia               |  |                    | 100 | %
|6. Techblend Inc.                     |  | British Virgin Islands |  |                    | 100 | %
|7. Hotel Travel Limited               |  | Malaysia               |  |                    | 100 | %
|8. HTN Co. Ltd.                       |  | Thailand               |  |                    | 100 | %
|9. ITC Bangkok Co. Ltd.               |  | Thailand               |  |                    | 51  | %